<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-4749-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Transport of volcanic aerosol from the Raikoke eruption in 2019 through the Northern Hemisphere</article-title><alt-title>Raikoke plume transport through the ASMA in 2019</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Zhen</given-names></name>
          <email>yangzhen212121@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4879-4420</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Vogel</surname><given-names>Bärbel</given-names></name>
          <email>b.vogel@fz-juelich.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9763-3055</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3 aff12">
          <name><surname>Plöger</surname><given-names>Felix</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>Zhixuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Dan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4812-5000</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff3">
          <name><surname>Griessbach</surname><given-names>Sabine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3792-3573</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff3">
          <name><surname>Hoffmann</surname><given-names>Lars</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3773-4377</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Wienhold</surname><given-names>Frank G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7 aff8">
          <name><surname>Asher</surname><given-names>Elizabeth</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7 aff9">
          <name><surname>Baron</surname><given-names>Alexandre A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-9579</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7 aff9">
          <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>Katie R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-064X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Thornberry</surname><given-names>Troy</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7478-1944</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff10 aff11">
          <name><surname>Bian</surname><given-names>Jianchun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-5834</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3 aff12 aff13">
          <name><surname>Hegglin</surname><given-names>Michaela I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Climate and Energy Systems: Stratosphere (ICE-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation (LAGEO), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Centre for Advanced Simulation and Analytics (CASA), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Extreme Meteorology, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science (IAC), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff13"><label>13</label><institution>Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Zhen Yang (yangzhen212121@gmail.com) and Bärbel Vogel (b.vogel@fz-juelich.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>4749</fpage><lpage>4769</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Zhen Yang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e286">Volcanic injections into the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) affect climate by altering Earth's radiation budget and atmospheric chemistry. However, the pathways by which mid-latitude eruptions spread globally remain poorly understood. We combine nighttime Compact Optical Backscatter Aerosol Detector (COBALD) profiles over Lhasa (China) with ERA5-driven Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) backward trajectories and global three-dimensional sulfur dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-based tracer simulations. With this integrated framework, we track the plume of the Raikoke eruption (21–22 June 2019) during its transport through the Northern Hemisphere and its interaction with the mature Asian Summer Monsoon Anticyclone (ASMA). Balloon-borne measurements capture the plume's arrival, vertical spreading, and dilution by air in the ASMA interior. Trajectories reveal two principal pathways from distinct Raikoke plumes: (i) an upper-level branch within the summertime stratospheric easterly flow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 460–490 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) carrying the trailing filament of the vorticized volcanic plume (VVP), and (ii) a lower-level branch within the subtropical westerly jet (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 390–430 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) carrying the main plume. Although the ASMA can act as a transport barrier at certain potential-temperature levels, it admits mixing into the anticyclone along jet-aligned filaments and redistributes aerosols internally. We show that the transport of the volcanic plume is sensitive to parameterized mixing by varying the mixing strength in CLaMS. Portable Optical Particle Spectrometer (POPS) profiles over Boulder (USA) confirm the plume's timing and altitude, providing an independent evaluation of its transport outside the ASMA region.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding-source>
<award-id>VO 1276/6-1</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42061134012</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42394121</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e339">The impact of volcanic eruptions on climate has been a subject of widespread concern <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.1"/>. Large eruptions can inject significant amounts of ash and sulfur dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) into the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS). While ash typically settles out within weeks, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is oxidized into sulfate aerosols. These aerosols can persist in the stratosphere for months to years and be transported globally by atmospheric circulation, leading to significant climate impacts. Sulfate aerosols efficiently scatter incoming solar radiation back to space, producing a global net cooling in the lower troposphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.2"/>. For instance, the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo caused a global surface temperature decrease of approximately 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the subsequent 2 years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.3"/>. Reconstructions based on satellite observations for 1979–2015 indicate that clusters of moderate eruptions since 2004 have imposed a persistent negative radiative forcing of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.4"/>. For 2014–2022, stratospheric injections from volcanic eruptions and wildfires produced a global-mean effective radiative forcing of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.5"/>. In addition, enhanced aerosol surface-area density promotes heterogeneous chemistry on polar stratospheric clouds, thereby accelerating ozone depletion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e442">Several key factors govern the climate impact of volcanic aerosols from an eruption: (1) eruption magnitude; (2) injection height and self-lofting; (3) eruption latitude; and (4) dynamical evolution. (1) Eruption magnitude can be characterized by the amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ash released, which largely controls aerosol formation potential and radiative forcing. Notably, substantial perturbations of stratospheric water vapour and aerosol microphysics have also been reported for the 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption despite modest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> injection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.7"/>. (2) Eruption products injected directly into the stratosphere, as well as volcanic plumes in the upper troposphere that self-loft into the lower stratosphere through radiative heating, can persist much longer than plumes confined to the troposphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.8"/>. (3) Aerosols from tropical eruptions are transported most efficiently via the Brewer–Dobson circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.9"/>, whereas mid-latitude eruption aerosols can still reach the tropics through Rossby-wave breaking or transport by the Asian Summer Monsoon Anticyclone (ASMA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.10"/>. (4) UTLS jet streams, cyclones, anticyclones, and stratospheric circulation govern dispersion patterns and dilution rates.</p>
      <p id="d2e480">In the Northern Hemisphere summer, the ASMA is the dominant circulation system in the UTLS. Deep convection injects pollutants into the UTLS, where the ASMA's strong anticyclonic circulation acts as a dynamical transport barrier, confining these air masses over Asia during ascent into the stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.11"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. However, as the ASMA boundary is not a strict transport barrier, air masses can be exported from the monsoon circulation into the extratropical UTLS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.12"/>. This combination of confinement and export is important for interpreting aerosol dispersion during boreal summer, including the dispersion of volcanic aerosol. Previous work on the 2011 Nabro eruption debated whether its plume reached the stratosphere directly or was lofted by monsoon ascent. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.13"/> proposed that the plume remained in the upper troposphere and was subsequently transported into the stratosphere by large-scale ascent in the monsoon, whereas later studies showed evidence of direct stratospheric injection, independent of monsoon-driven lifting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.14"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e499">The mid-latitude Raikoke volcano erupted on 21–22 June 2019. Raikoke injected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the lower stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.15"/>. Subsequently, ash-driven radiative heating lofted parts of the volcanic plume, raising the volcanic cloud top above 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.16"/>. 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the eruption, compact anticyclonic “vorticized volcanic plumes” (VVPs) detached from the main volcanic cloud, trapping more than half of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.17"/>. The primary VVP then rose to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, spanning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in width but only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in depth. Meanwhile, the residual main plume was diluted at lower altitudes, resulting in two distinct Raikoke plumes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.18"/>. In August 2019, part of the aerosol plume was transported into and through the ASMA during the mature stage of the boreal-summer anticyclone, providing an ideal case to examine how the ASMA modulates volcanic plume transport.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e625"><bold>(a)</bold> Map showing the locations of the balloon measurement sites over Lhasa (29.7° N, 91.1° E) and Boulder (39.9° N, 105.2° W), and the Raikoke volcano (48.3° N, 153.3° E). The blue contour shows the ERA5 geopotential height at 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over August 2019 at 00:00 UTC. The 14.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contour is used here as an indicator of the ASMA at UTLS levels. <bold>(b)</bold> Spatial distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from TROPOMI, retrieved with an assumed plume height of 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using orbits from 22:46 UTC on 24 June to 03:50 UTC on 25 June 2019.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e683">Beginning in August 2019, frequent balloon-borne measurements were conducted over Lhasa, at UTLS levels located within the ASMA as indicated by the ERA5 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> geopotential height field (Fig. 1a). The profiles captured two pronounced aerosol layers at distinct altitudes that are consistent with the trailing filament of the VVP and the diluted main plume. We combine these observations with ERA5-driven CLaMS backward trajectories and global three-dimensional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer simulations to investigate the source region, transport pathways, and transit times from Raikoke to the Tibetan Plateau. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based refers to passive tracers initialized using the horizontal extent of the Raikoke <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud derived from the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) aboard Sentinel-5P <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.19"/>. We further use POPS profiles from Lhasa and Boulder to evaluate the simulated plume evolution over the Northern Hemisphere. In particular, Boulder serves as an independent site outside the ASMA region to evaluate plume transport. In situ UTLS observations of volcanic aerosol are rare, particularly for the 2019 Raikoke eruption. Here we combine balloon-borne COBALD and POPS profiles with high-resolution ERA5-driven CLaMS backward trajectories and global three-dimensional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer simulations to identify transport of the Raikoke plume through the Northern Hemisphere and into the ASMA, with particular attention to transport pathways and time scales. Specifically, we address the following research questions: (1) What are the key transport pathways of the Raikoke plume in the vicinity of the ASMA?  (2) Which processes dominate plume dilution?  In addition, we quantify the sensitivity of the simulations to key model settings (parameterized mixing intensity, injection height, and injection region).</p>
      <p id="d2e742">The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Sect. 2 describes data and methods; Sect. 3 presents balloon observations from Lhasa and Boulder; Sect. 4 reports the backward-trajectory analysis and global CLaMS transport simulations; Sect. 5 discusses modelling sensitivities, including sensitivities to parameterized mixing, injection-region definition, and injection height; Sect. 6 concludes; and Appendix A presents supplementary material.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e748">Summary of analyzed balloon flights at Lhasa and Boulder, including sequential flight ID, date, mid-ascent time (UTC), key instruments used in this study, and the potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranges of the observed volcanic plume layer. The plume layer was identified from COBALD measurements where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 and CI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, and from POPS measurements where the particle number concentration exceeded 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mid-ascent time denotes the midpoint of the ascent period from launch to balloon burst. The “Key instruments” column lists only the instruments analyzed in this work; additional payload components were flown but are not listed here. A dash (–) denotes that no volcanic plume layer was identified for that flight.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Flight ID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mid-ascent time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Key instruments</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Observed plume layer:</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Observed plume layer:</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(UTC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lhasa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30 Jul 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17:58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">410–422; 459–472</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">78–71; 59–56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">404–416</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">82–75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">389–423</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">98–73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16:05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">397–422</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84–70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">398–426</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84–71</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17:24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">406–423</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">79–71</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17:14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH POPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">393–434</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">89–68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30 Sep 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">385–452</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">96–64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 Oct 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">390–459</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100–60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24 Nov 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">410–482</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">79–55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4 Jan 2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15:29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">COBALD CFH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">393–399; 415–432</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">118–115; 99–91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Boulder</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 Jun 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17:05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">POPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17:08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">POPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">373–442</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">122–73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27 Aug 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16:38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">POPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">385–429; 480–505</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">117–80; 59–52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8 Nov 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17:58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">POPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">389–435</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">107–76</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3 Dec 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18:05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">POPS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Balloon-borne Instruments</title>
      <p id="d2e1357">Volcanic aerosol profiles at Lhasa were obtained during the 2019 Asian Summer Monsoon (ASM) season as part of the Sounding Water Vapor, Ozone, and Particles (SWOP) campaign. The SWOP campaign was led by the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Balloons were equipped with an electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde, a cryogenic frostpoint hygrometer (CFH), a compact optical backscatter aerosol detector (COBALD), and an International Met Systems (InterMet) iMet-1-RSB radiosonde <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.20"/>. However, ECC ozone measurements are not analyzed in this study. A total of 9 measurements occurred in July–August (1 in July, 8 in August), followed by monthly measurements through January 2020. On 20 August 2019, the payload also included a Portable Optical Particle Spectrometer (POPS). During July–August 2019, Lhasa lay within the interior of the ASMA at UTLS levels (Fig. 1a). The site was chosen to observe the Raikoke plume in the ASMA interior and to document its arrival and vertical evolution. Additional information on SWOP field activities and on campaigns conducted in other years is available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx74" id="text.21"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1366">The POPS data over Boulder were provided by the Baseline Balloon Stratospheric Aerosol Profiles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAP</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) project; we analyze five profiles – 3 influenced by the Raikoke eruption (2 in August 2019 and 1 in November 2019) and 2 background references on 28 June 2019 and 3 December 2019 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.22"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1385">Figure 1a shows the geographic locations of Raikoke volcano and the balloon-sounding sites at Lhasa and Boulder. An overview of the analyzed balloon flights at Lhasa and Boulder, including the identified plume-layer ranges, is provided in Table 1.</p>
      <p id="d2e1388">The Compact Optical Backscatter Aerosol Detector (COBALD) was developed by ETH Zurich <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.23"/>. Its lightweight and portable design makes it suitable for balloon payloads used in the study of cirrus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.24"/> and aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.25"/>. COBALD uses two high-power LEDs emitting at 455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) and 940 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (near‑infrared). It measures backscattered light from air molecules and particles, including aerosols and cloud particles (e.g. ice crystals). The backscatter ratio (BSR) is defined as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M51" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>particles</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the backscatter coefficient of air molecules and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>particles</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the backscatter coefficient of aerosols or cloud particles. The instrument measures only the total backscatter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>particles</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated in post-processing from Rayleigh scattering using the measured pressure and temperature profiles, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>particles</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the backscatter ratio at 455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The instrument's field of view is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6°, and its detection range spans 0.5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Because sunlight severely interferes with the measurements, COBALD is only operated at night. COBALD BSR uncertainty is typically characterized by an absolute error interval of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % for the profile, while the precision is better than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % under UTLS conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.26"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1591">The COBALD color index (CI) is defined as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M64" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">940</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which serves as an empirical proxy for particle size within aerosol layers. Note that when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">940</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are close to 1, CI can become sensitive to small baseline or calibration offsets.</p>
      <p id="d2e1650">The Cryogenic Frostpoint Hygrometer (CFH) is a high‐precision instrument for measuring water vapor based on the chilled mirror principle. It controls the mirror temperature to maintain a stable frost- or dew-point. Combined with temperature and pressure data from the iMet radiosonde, the relative humidity over ice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is calculated using the empirical equation from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.27"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M68" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mirror</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>environment</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the saturation vapour pressure over ice at temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (in Kelvin), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mirror</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured frost-point temperature, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>environment</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ambient air temperature. CFH uncertainties may be as low as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % in the lower troposphere and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % near the tropical tropopause under good operating conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.28"/>. For UTLS conditions we use a conservative uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.29"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1789">The Portable Optical Particle Spectrometer (POPS) is a lightweight instrument for measuring aerosol number density and size distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.30"/>. POPS employs a 405 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> laser to detect light scattered by individual particles, with scattering intensity related to particle size. It measures particles from 140 to 2500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and reports number concentrations in size bins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.31"/>. Measurement uncertainties are dominated by particle sizing (including sensitivity to the assumed refractive index) and flow-rate calibration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.32"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>TROPOMI</title>
      <p id="d2e1825">TROPOMI, the satellite instrument aboard ESA's sun-synchronous Sentinel-5P platform launched in 2017, is a hyperspectral imaging spectrometer that records back-scattered radiation from the ultraviolet to the shortwave infrared <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.33"/>. Total-column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Dobson units (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>16</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is retrieved using differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) applied to three wavelength windows (312–326, 325–335, 360–390 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.34"/>. The publicly available Level 2 product provides four vertical columns: the surface–to–top-of-atmosphere column and three columns assuming an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plume centered at 1, 7, or 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude. Following previous Raikoke studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.35"/>, we adopt the 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval, which most closely matches the eruption's mean injection height; values below the instrument's 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limit are excluded, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.36"/>. Four consecutive TROPOMI overpasses of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column density at 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude captured the entire Raikoke <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud between 22:46 UTC on 24 June and 03:50 UTC on 25 June 2019 (Fig. 1b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>CLaMS</title>
      <p id="d2e1985">The Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) is a chemistry–transport model that calculates the three-dimensional motion of air parcels, which in turn represent the model grid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.37"/>. The CLaMS hybrid vertical coordinate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) follows orography near the surface and transitions smoothly into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> once <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches 0.3 (usually about 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.38"/>. The isentropic coordinate in CLaMS is well suited for representing transport and mixing in the stratosphere. All CLaMS applications in this study – both backward trajectories and three-dimensional simulations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracers – are driven by ERA5 reanalysis: the standard runs use the native hourly fields on the 0.3° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3° (latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude) grid with 137 vertical levels up to 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.39"/>, whereas the sensitivity experiment in Appendix Fig. A2 repeats the simulation with ERA5 fields at 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° spatial and 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temporal resolution.</p>
      <p id="d2e2098">Diabatic backward trajectories are initialized every second along the balloon's vertical ascent profile, using the in-situ measurements of temperature (for deriving potential temperature), pressure, time, longitude, and latitude to define the start positions. Vertical velocities were computed from ERA5 wind fields and total diabatic heating rates, including clear-sky and cloud radiation, latent heat release, and turbulent and diffusive transport <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.40"/>. This approach captures uplifts by resolved convection as represented in ERA5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.41"/>. To identify the volcanic influence, only those backward trajectories that passed through the Raikoke eruption region (Fig. 1b) during 22:46 UTC on 24 June and 03:50 UTC on 25 June 2019 were retained.</p>
      <p id="d2e2107">Global three-dimensional transport simulations use passive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracers initialized from the horizontal extent of the Raikoke <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud in the TROPOMI 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product (Fig. 1b; four overpasses between 22:46 UTC on 24 June and 03:50 UTC on 25 June 2019; values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.42"/>. At 00:00 UTC on 25 June 2019, parcels inside this mask are initialized to 1 (0 outside) within 3 potential-temperature ranges (380–400, 400–420, and 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and then advected and mixed globally, yielding tracer fractions between 0 and 1.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2171">Summary of tracer simulations using different injection-region definitions (satellite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plume mask and a rectangular domain), including injection layer, mixing interval, and critical Lyapunov exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="42mm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="40mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Injection region</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Injection</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mixing</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left">Notes</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">layer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">interval (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6">All simulations listed below are driven by ERA5 at 0.3° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3° spatial and 1 h temporal resolution. Figure A2 shows the </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6">SO<sub><italic>2</italic></sub>-based_Control simulation repeated with coarser ERA5 input (1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° spatial, 6 h temporal resolution). </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based_Control</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">satellite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plume mask</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">380–400;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left">reference run</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">400–420;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">420–440</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based_Modified</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">satellite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plume mask</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">380–400;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" morerows="1" align="left">main run; best agreement with observations</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">400–420;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">420–440</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">rectangle-based_Modified</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">(49–62° N,  163° E–170° W)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">380–400;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" morerows="1" align="left">sensitivity to injection-region definition</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">400–420;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">420–440</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2525">To assess how different mixing intensities influence the reconstruction of volcanic plume transport processes, two simulations were conducted: (i) a control simulation with mixing every 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (a commonly used set-up for CLaMS simulations driven by high-resolution ERA5 reanalysis data; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="altparen.43"/>); (ii) a modified simulation with mixing every 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the CLaMS mixing scheme, parameterized mixing is triggered when the integral deformation between neighboring air parcels exceeds an empirical critical deformation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the critical Lyapunov exponent and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the advective time step (mixing interval). For a given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (thus a larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) requires stronger deformation to trigger mixing and therefore corresponds to less frequent parameterized mixing (and vice versa) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.44"/>. In our setup, the modified simulation corresponds to enhanced parameterized mixing compared to the control simulation. Throughout most of the paper we show results from the modified simulation, as these agree better with the observations. Sensitivity to parameterized mixing intensity and comparisons with the control simulation are discussed in Sect. 5.1. The mixing configurations and the additional sensitivity runs (rectangular mask and coarser ERA5 input) are summarized in Table 2.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2659">COBALD and CFH profiles above Lhasa from 30 July 2019 to 4 January 2020. COBALD backscatter ratio at 455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, blue) and COBALD color index (CI, black) are shown together with CFH relative humidity over ice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, magenta). Pressure is given on the left axis and the corresponding potential temperature on the right axis. Orange shading marks the Raikoke influenced aerosol layers used to initialize the backward trajectories. Light blue shading indicates lower altitude aerosol enhancements attributed to ATAL that are not used for the plume initialization. Gray shading indicates cirrus conditions.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Measurement Results</title>
      <p id="d2e2707">The COBALD–CFH tandem provides a practical method for identifying cirrus clouds and aerosol layers because collocated backscatter and frost-point humidity measurements allow a straightforward separation of ice-cloud signatures from aerosol enhancements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.45"/>. Cirrus clouds are identified using the criteria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 % and CI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.46"/>. These clouds are shown as gray-shaded regions in Fig. 2. On 30 July 2019, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 % at 423 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but no corresponding enhancement in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed; thus, this layer is not classified as cirrus by our joint criterion and likely represents a moist, ice-free layer. When cirrus and aerosols occur within the same profile, aerosol and cloud signals can generally be separated if they are vertically distinct (e.g., using BSR and CI), whereas if a cirrus cloud overlaps the aerosol layer at the same altitude, the aerosol contribution cannot be reliably isolated because cirrus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> typically dominates. Thus, the aerosol cannot be reliably detected or quantified under such conditions. Using these criteria, we exclude cirrus-contaminated layers. Remaining enhancements with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are treated as aerosol layers and then classified using a CI threshold of 6: layers attributed to the Raikoke plume (CI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6) are highlighted in orange in Fig. 2, while layers more consistent with ATAL aerosol (CI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6) are highlighted in light blue. We note that CI is used here as an additional indicator within aerosol layers and should be interpreted with caution, and that the ATAL identification in our dataset is limited. In very clean air where BSR values at both wavelengths approach 1, CI can become unstable; we therefore apply CI only within aerosol layers with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after excluding cirrus. On 3 August 2019, 42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the Raikoke eruption, two distinct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks were observed: the upper peak at 459–472 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (59–56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reached the maximum value recorded in Lhasa (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8), and the lower peak at 410–422 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (78–71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) had a somewhat weaker magnitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4). On 6 August 2019, another sharp peak appeared at 404–416 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (82–75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). After 8 August 2019, the peaks became less sharp and more vertically extended, which persisted until 24 November 2019. By 4 January 2020, the aerosol backscatter enhancement had further weakened, and no distinct peak was observed in the profile.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2943"><bold>(a)</bold> COBALD measurements in Lhasa. The black line represents the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 2019 profiles influenced by the volcanic event, and the gray lines show the corresponding individual profiles. The red line shows the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the ATAL in 2013. The blue line corresponds to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 30 July 2019, which was not affected by the Raikoke eruption. <bold>(b)</bold> POPS measurements in Boulder and Lhasa.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e2990">In general, ATAL-related enhancements in COBALD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles are largely confined to 360–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (core near 370–390 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with occasional extensions up to 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on region and year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.47"/>. The ATAL profile from 2013 shown in Fig. 3a is taken from the COBALD measurements over Lhasa reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.48"/>. The 2019 median peak occurs near 417 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, about 33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the 2013 ATAL peak (384 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), corresponding to roughly 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in altitude in the UTLS (based on the 30 July 2019 background sounding). The vertical extent of ATAL enhancements varies across regions and years; therefore, we emphasize the peak magnitude as the more robust difference: the 2019 Raikoke-related median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25, exceeding the 2013 ATAL peak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.10; Fig. 3a).</p>
      <p id="d2e3094">All POPS particle number densities are converted to standard temperature and pressure (STP; 1013 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 273.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to remove the pressure-driven decline with altitude (Fig. 3b). At Boulder, no clear volcanic aerosol signal was present on 28 June 2019, and by 3 December 2019 the profile shows no obvious volcanic aerosol peak (Fig. 3b). The particle number density at Lhasa on 20 August 2019 was lower than that at Boulder on 7 and 27 August 2019. This is consistent with the global CLaMS tracer simulations (Sect. 4.2; cf. Figs. 7 and 8), which show that the main Raikoke plume is transported along the subtropical westerly jet in the mid-latitude UTLS, while transport into the ASMA interior is more limited due to the anticyclone acting as a partial horizontal barrier. Section 4 presents backward-trajectory calculations and three-dimensional tracer simulations with CLaMS to verify the origin and transport pathways of the plume observed over Lhasa and Boulder.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results of CLaMS transport simulations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Backward-Trajectory Calculations</title>
      <p id="d2e3128">To verify that the enhanced aerosol layers observed over Lhasa are linked to the Raikoke eruption, we calculated ERA5-driven diabatic backward trajectories with CLaMS (Fig. 4). Trajectories were released every second along each balloon ascent within the selected plume-layer potential-temperature intervals (orange shading in Fig. 2), using the iMet-derived time and location (longitude, latitude, pressure, and temperature) as initial conditions. All trajectories were calculated backward to a single common reference time (21 June 2019, 18:00 UTC), which serves as the trajectory endpoint for all cases.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3133">Backward trajectories initialized from the Lhasa balloon observations and traced back to the Raikoke eruption reference time (21 June 2019, 18:00 UTC). Only trajectories initialized within the enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential-temperature range (orange shading in Fig. 2) are shown. Colors indicate trajectory longitude. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis shows date (dd.mm.yy) along the backward integration (right: balloon initialization time; left: eruption reference time).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3162">Backward trajectories for the Lhasa flights (3, 6, 8, 10, and 12 August 2019). Only trajectories that intersect the TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mask between 24 June 2019, 22:46 UTC and 25 June 2019, 03:50 UTC are shown. Trajectories are colored by potential temperature, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mask is shaded in orange. Panel titles give the start day, start <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range, and the fraction of trajectories that satisfy the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mask criterion. Locations of Lhasa and Raikoke are marked.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3212">Pronounced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks were observed over Lhasa on 3 and 6 August 2019 (Fig. 2). For the upper layer on 3 August 2019, backward trajectories indicate that the air parcels were transported approximately along isentropic surfaces (Fig. 4). By contrast, the lower layer on 3 August 2019 includes trajectories lofted from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 370 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 410 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the upper layer on 3 August 2019, the transport pathways differed significantly from other layers, as evidenced by changes in longitude (see Fig. 5 for trajectory details). This suggests that the enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resulted from volcanic aerosols originating from two distinct branches of the volcanic plume at different altitudes, each following a different transport pathway. From 8–20 August 2019, mixing from lower potential-temperature levels began to occur. This coincided with a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the in-situ measurements, as air with relatively low aerosol concentrations dilutes the enhanced signals. Over the following three months, as the ASMA weakened seasonally, air from lower potential-temperature levels increasingly influenced the Lhasa profiles. During this period, peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the identified plume layer (orange shading in Fig. 2) decreased from values up to 1.88 in early August 2019 (95th percentile up to 1.77) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25 from 30 September to 24 November 2019 (95th percentile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.24), indicating progressive dilution of the volcanic aerosol layer by relatively aerosol-poor air from the lower troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e3296">To illustrate air masses influenced by the Raikoke eruption, we filtered backward trajectories to include only those passing through the eruption region (Fig. 1b) between 22:46 UTC on 24 June 2019 and 03:50 UTC on 25 June 2019. We then examined several representative pathways to show how the volcanic plume entered the ASMA interior (Fig. 5). In Fig. 5, the reported fraction is defined as (number of trajectories that meet the eruption-region criterion)/(total number of backward trajectories initialized for the corresponding flight date and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> layer shown in Fig. 4). For the 6 cases shown in Fig. 5, the total numbers of initialized trajectories are 79 and 50 (3 August 2019, two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> layers), 72 (6 August 2019), 190 (8 August 2019), 165 (10 August 2019), and 105 (12 August 2019). Because this filtering criterion is highly selective, only a small fraction of trajectories remains, and the resulting fractions can be regarded as conservative estimates. A sensitivity test shows that the fraction of backward trajectories reaching the eruption region is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %–10 % when using the original TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> footprint and satellite-pass time window, but increases to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 %–28 % when applying a broader rectangular domain (42–73° N, 137–215° E) and extending the time window to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The retained trajectories still follow the same main transport pathways shown here, providing confidence in the identified transport patterns.</p>
      <p id="d2e3347">For the calculation on 3 August 2019, the trajectories are divided into two distinct branches. The trajectories in the lower branch originate from 410–422 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and correspond to the main volcanic aerosol plume carried by the subtropical westerly jet. The upper branch originates from 459–472 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Satellite observations from TROPOMI on Sentinel-5P indicate that the VVP core was entrained into the summertime easterlies around 20–25 July <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.49"/>. The backward trajectories initialized in the 3 August 2019 plume layer (459–472 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Fig. 5 are consistent with the late-July phase of this satellite-tracked pathway. The potential temperature of the VVP during its transit through the ASMA inferred from satellite detections also closely matches the altitudes of enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.50"/>. Meanwhile, lidar measurements in Wuhan (central China) on 30 July reveal that the VVP's core backscatter coefficient is much greater than that of the main aerosol plume <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.51"/>, implying that our measurements in this branch captured only the trailing filament of the VVP. Although both sets of air parcels belong to the same balloon profile, they trace back to two distinct plume components: the lower-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> main plume in the subtropical westerly jet (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 410–422 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the higher-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> VVP filament in the summertime easterlies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 459–472 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This indicates different source altitudes within the Raikoke plume and distinct dynamical transport pathways.</p>
      <p id="d2e3440">From 6 to 20 August 2019, the overall transport pattern remained similar to that on 6 August 2019 – corresponding to the main volcanic aerosol plume primarily driven by the subtropical westerly jet. After entering the ASMA, some air parcels deviate from the jet pathway and circulate within the anticyclonic region. This increased spreading of trajectories suggests dispersion and lateral mixing with surrounding air, which may contribute to the observed decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3456">Same as Fig. 5, but for the Boulder flights (7 and 27 August 2019). For 27 August 2019, the fraction is computed for 385–429 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the plotted trajectories are restricted to 405–410 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to better illustrate the transport pathways. Locations of Boulder, Lhasa, and Raikoke are marked.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3482">Backward trajectories for the Boulder flights on 7 and 27 August 2019 are shown in Fig. 6. On 7 August 2019, an enhanced aerosol layer is observed between 373 and 442 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (particle number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The corresponding backward trajectories indicate transport to Boulder primarily along the subtropical westerly jet. On 27 August 2019, two volcanic layers are present. The upper layer (480–505 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is associated with the VVP filament transported in summertime easterlies. The lower layer occurs at 385–429 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To better illustrate the transport pathway, we plot only trajectories initialized between 405 and 410 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These trajectories indicate that the plume had already traveled once around the globe before reaching Boulder.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3541"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer fractions within the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer from the modified simulation (simulation details in Table 2). The purple triangle indicates Lhasa. The ASMA edge is shown by the black contour at the 378 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>3</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Montgomery streamfunction. The white contour marks the 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential vorticity isoline.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Global three-dimensional CLaMS simulations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracers</title>
      <p id="d2e3632">In global three-dimensional CLaMS simulations, we use passive tracers initialized from the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plume mask (Fig. 1b). We refer to these as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracers. At 00:00 UTC on 25 June 2019, the tracer is set to 1 inside the mask (0 outside) within 3 potential-temperature ranges (380–400, 400–420, and 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and then advected and mixed throughout the global atmosphere in CLaMS. We present results for the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release, while the 380–400 and 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> releases are used as sensitivity tests (Sect. 5.2; Figs. 11–12). Figure 7 shows global maps of fractions of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer falling within the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer for each measurement day from 30 July to 20 August 2019, using the modified simulation. Here, the tracer fraction (0–1) represents the fractional contribution of air originating from the volcanic plume (identified by the TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mask shown in Fig. 1b) after advection and mixing.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e3714">Same as Fig. 7, but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer fractions within the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer over the North American continent. The black triangle indicates the location of Boulder.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3742">The ASMA is indicated by the Montgomery streamfunction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.52"/> at the 378 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>3</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contour (layer mean over 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as an estimate of its edge. The 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> potential vorticity contour (layer mean over 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) illustrates the isentropic transport, including ASMA outflow (filaments) and in-mixing of PV-rich air from high latitudes. The strong transport barrier of the ASMA observed within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 370–390 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much weaker above 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.53"/>. The results shown in Fig. 7 illustrate the overall intrusion of air masses into the ASMA and agree well with the Lhasa COBALD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations. From 30 July to 1 August 2019, part of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer entered the ASMA from its eastern side without reaching Lhasa. This is consistent with the absence of clear aerosol signals in the lower layers of the balloon-borne measurement data. On 3 and 6 August 2019, air masses impacted by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer arrived above Lhasa. Without a significant effect of upwelling from below at that time, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer signals remained sharp and concentrated. From 8 to 20 August, most of the ASMA contained mixed air masses. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer fractions inside the ASMA remained lower than outside, reflecting the anticyclonic transport barrier. During August, only a minor fraction of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer is located inside the ASMA, while the majority remains outside. By later months, progressive mixing reduces the contrast between ASMA and surrounding regions in the tracer distribution (not shown here).</p>
      <p id="d2e3903">The corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer fractions within the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer over the North American continent are shown in Fig. 8. Elevated tracer fractions are simulated over Boulder on both 7 and 27 August 2019. By 8 November 2019, the overall tracer fractions are markedly lower, reflecting progressive dilution by mixing during transport.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Modelling sensitivities</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Sensitivity to parameterized mixing and injection-region definition</title>
      <p id="d2e3942">To assess the sensitivity of plume dispersion to model settings, such as parameterized mixing intensity, tracer release regions, and release altitudes, we performed a series of sensitivity experiments.  In previous work with CLaMS driven by 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° resolution and 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temporal resolution reanalysis data (e.g., ERA5, ERA-Interim, as applied in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.54"/>), the intensity of parameterized small-scale mixing was controlled by choosing a critical Lyapunov exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a mixing interval of 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="altparen.55"/>). Here, we performed simulations with CLaMS driven by high-resolution ERA5 data (0.3° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3° resolution, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and found best agreement with observations by enhancing mixing intensity in the simulation slightly by choosing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a mixing interval of 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Taken together, the modified setup corresponds to enhanced parameterized mixing compared to the control setup.</p>
      <p id="d2e4028">To evaluate the sensitivity of our results with respect to parameterized mixing intensity, Figure A1 in the Appendix shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer fractions from the control simulation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; mixing interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and compares them with those from the modified simulation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Fig. 7. The control simulation in Figure A1 shows a similar overall intrusion pattern but lacks the distinct fractions over Lhasa on 3 August 2019. The tracer distribution in the control simulation is more fragmented, presenting small, isolated pockets compared to the more homogeneous structures in the modified simulation. In a further sensitivity test, we repeat the control simulation with ERA5 fields at coarser spatial and temporal resolution (details in Table 2). This setup reduces computing time and is often used for global CLaMS simulations that cover multiple years. However, changing the ERA5 resolution has only a minor effect and does not affect our conclusions. This is evident from the comparison of Fig. A1 (0.3° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3°, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Fig. A2 (1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1°, 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e4156">Comparison of tracer-fraction profiles with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile over Lhasa. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer fractions from the control simulation (orange) and the modified simulation (blue) are shown together with rectangle-based tracer fractions from the modified simulation (red); see Table 2 for simulation details. Annotation colors match the corresponding simulation profiles. Values give the Pearson correlation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the absolute peak-height offset <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the model tracer-fraction profile and the COBALD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile within the analyzed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range (375–450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 375–475 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 30 September, 28 October, and 24 November 2019).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4252">The different Raikoke tracers from the global three-dimensional CLaMS simulations are interpolated in time and space to the balloon-borne vertical profiles, providing a tracer-fraction profile at each measurement time. By comparing these tracer-fraction profiles from the model simulations with different mixing intensities with the observations (Fig. 9), we assess how the chosen parameterized mixing intensities affect the accuracy of the simulated plume dispersion. To quantify model–measurement agreement for each profile, we compute (i) the Pearson correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between the area-normalized tracer-fraction profile and the COBALD aerosol backscatter ratio at 455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ABSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BSR</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.56"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, over the main plume layer (375–450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 375–475 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 30 September, 28 October, and 24 November 2019) and (ii) the absolute peak-height difference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two profiles. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reflects only linear association and should be interpreted as a relative indicator rather than a definitive measure of agreement. The values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are annotated in Fig. 9. In Fig. 9, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracers are also released at 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This setup primarily samples the diluted main plume rather than the higher-altitude trailing filament of the vorticized volcanic plume (VVP). Accordingly, the higher-altitude peak on 3 August 2019 likely originates from the VVP filament near 460–490 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and is not resolved by the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release. A sensitivity simulation targeting the upper-level VVP filament shows enhanced tracer fractions near the observation region (not shown here); however, with the currently used CLaMS resolution, this thin and sharp aerosol peak at a single profile location is difficult to reproduce. Consistent with Figs. 7 and A1, the modified simulation produces tracer peaks (blue lines) that closely match the balloon measurements – except on 6 and 8 August 2019, when the peak altitudes deviate slightly. For most dates, the modified simulation shows consistently higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although the control simulation (orange lines) occasionally aligns with observed peak altitudes, its overall agreement is weaker and it shows large peak-altitude biases on 12 August 2019 and 24 November 2019 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>peak</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; Fig. 9). Overall, the modified simulation captures the vertical structure of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile well, despite minor differences in peak altitude for certain dates.</p>
      <p id="d2e4468">Furthermore, we assess the sensitivity of the model simulations to the plume initialization by carrying out another simulation using the modified configuration, in which Raikoke plume tracers are initialized within a rectangular latitude–longitude mask (from 49 to 62° N and 163° E to 170° W), following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.57"/> (see Table 2 for simulation details). Tracers were released on multiple isentropic levels within this rectangular domain. Here, we show the rectangle-based tracer fractions, released at potential‐temperature levels of 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red lines in Fig. 9). The peak heights of the rectangle-based tracer fractions (red lines) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer fractions (blue lines) show no significant difference. Because the release domain captures the plume core, even a simple rectangular mask reproduces the observed peak altitude. Hence, for the Raikoke simulations the choice of injection region is less critical than the choice of model mixing intensity.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e4495">Same as Fig. 9 but for Boulder: comparison of tracer-fraction profiles with the POPS aerosol number-concentration profile at STP. Annotations report <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) relative to POPS within the analyzed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range (375–450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 7 and 27 August 2019, and 375–475 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 8 November 2019).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4557">Over Boulder, we likewise compare the tracer-fraction profiles on the measurement dates with the POPS aerosol number concentration profiles at STP (Fig. 10). For the computation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we evaluate within 375–450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 7 and 27 August 2019, and within 375–475 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 8 November 2019. Overall, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracers in the modified simulation (blue) reproduce the observed peak structure more closely, with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than the control and rectangle-based simulations.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e4618"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer‐fraction profiles from the modified simulation at different isentropic injection levels (simulation details in Table 2), compared with COBALD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles. Blue lines: injections at 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; brown lines: 380–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; purple lines: 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Annotation colors match the corresponding injection-layer curves; values are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the model tracer-fraction profile and the COBALD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile within the analyzed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range (375–450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 375–475 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 30 September, 28 October, and 24 November 2019).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Sensitivity to injection height</title>
      <p id="d2e4744">The Raikoke plume was injected primarily within 8–16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.58"/>. The main injection occurred between 18:00 UTC on 21 June and 03:00 UTC on 22 June 2019 (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release possibly extending to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 06:00 UTC) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.59"/>. Radiative heating of ash and nascent sulfate then lofted parts of the plume, raising volcanic cloud tops above 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the eruption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.60"/>. These observations indicate that Raikoke's plume experienced an intense updraft during the eruption stage. Aerosol‑radiative lofting is not included in the CLaMS simulations. However, comparison of the vertical profiles of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracers with in-situ measurements allows estimation of the lofting height. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracers were injected at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals between 360 and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to cover the entire possible extent of the Raikoke plume. To assess which initialization range best reproduces the observed plume, we compare tracer‑fraction profiles with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles in Fig. 11.</p>

      <fig id="F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e4851">Same as Fig. 11 but for Boulder: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer-fraction profiles from the modified simulation at different isentropic injection levels compared with the POPS aerosol number-concentration profile at STP. Blue: 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; brown: 380–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; purple: 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Annotations report <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) relative to POPS within the analyzed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range (375–450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 7 and 27 August 2019, and 375–475 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 8 November 2019).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4948">Overall, tracers initialized within 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue lines; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15–16.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the Raikoke site) best match the enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles, compared with 380–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (brown) and 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (purple). For most dates, the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> initialization attains the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the smallest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among the three layers (see annotations in Fig. 11). For instance, on 3, 6, and 12 August 2019, tracers initialized in the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer contribute most strongly to the peak of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile, while those from the 380–400 and 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layers also produce peaks at the same altitude but with smaller amplitudes. On 8 August, 30 September, and 28 October 2019, only the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer reproduces the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak at the correct altitude, whereas the peaks from the 380–400 and 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracers appear below or above the observed height. For Boulder (Fig. 12), the 400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> initialization likewise shows the best agreement with the observations. On 7 August 2019 the 380–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer, and on 27 August 2019 the 420–440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer, produce peaks that disagree strongly with the observations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e5124"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.61"/> estimate a peak injection altitude near 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the tracer level that best matches the observed profiles corresponds to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15–16.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (400–420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We hypothesize that this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> offset could be consistent with radiative self-heating lofting of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich cloud, but it may also reflect uncertainties in injection-height estimates across techniques and model-related discrepancies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx67" id="altparen.62"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5199">Motivated by the limited availability of in-situ UTLS measurements of volcanic plume and the need to better quantify ASMA-related transport pathways, we combined in-situ balloon observations over Lhasa and Boulder with Lagrangian transport simulations using the CLaMS model, driven by high-resolution ERA5 data, to investigate the transport pathways and mixing processes of the Raikoke plume in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) during the mature phase of the Asian Summer Monsoon Anticyclone (ASMA). Our main conclusions are: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5204"><italic>Analysis of backward trajectories.</italic> 42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the Raikoke eruption, the enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was first detected over Lhasa. Two separate transport pathways carried the Raikoke plume to the Tibetan Plateau: (i) a high-altitude pathway along summertime easterly winds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 460–490 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) transporting the trailing filament of the vorticized volcanic plume (VVP) and (ii) a lower-level route via the subtropical westerly jet (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 390–430 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) transporting the main volcanic plume. These branches converge over Lhasa on 3 August 2019 but at different altitudes, explaining the dual peaks observed in balloon-borne backscatter profiles.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5260"><italic>Dilution via mixing with relatively aerosol-poor air.</italic> During transport through the lower stratosphere, the plume is progressively diluted by background air with low aerosol concentrations. After entering the ASMA, dilution may be driven by upwelling from lower potential temperature levels and by dispersion and lateral mixing with surrounding air. These processes are consistent with the progressively smoothed peaks of enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals observed along the balloon profiles.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5277"><italic>Validation of CLaMS SO</italic><sub><italic>2</italic></sub><italic>-based tracers.</italic> The modified CLaMS simulations using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracers successfully capture transport into the ASMA and reconstruct the vertical structure observed over Lhasa, as well as over the North American continent in Boulder. Compared with the control simulation (mixing every 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the modified simulation (mixing every 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) produces more coherent tracer distributions that closely match the enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e5330">In summary, by combining observations and modelling, we provide further insights into how the mid-latitude Raikoke plume is transported through the Northern Hemisphere UTLS over long distances. We show evidence that the Asian summer monsoon plays a key role in this transport. In particular, parts of the plume are entrained into the monsoon anticyclone and are subsequently diluted by horizontal transport and vertical upwelling within the anticyclone. Our findings improve the understanding of how aerosols from a mid-latitude volcanic injection are transported and dispersed in the lower stratosphere, including in the vicinity of the Asian summer monsoon. This improved understanding of plume transport and dilution is relevant for estimating regional radiative forcing and assessing potential impacts on stratospheric ozone chemistry.</p>
      <p id="d2e5333">We identified two distinct isentropic transport pathways and assessed plume dilution via mixing with air masses outside the plume. Our simulations show that atmospheric mixing processes, as parameterized in CLaMS in relation to flow deformation, are critical for dispersing the volcanic plume during stratospheric transport. Accordingly, changes in model resolution require adjustment of the mixing parameterization. Our results suggest that a small fraction of the Raikoke plume becomes entrained into the ASMA. Within the ASMA, confinement and summertime diabatic uplift can potentially transport these plume fractions to higher altitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.63"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title/>

      <fig id="FA1"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e5354">Same as Fig. 7, but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based tracer fractions from the control simulation (simulation details in Table 2), driven by ERA5 at 0.3° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3° spatial and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temporal resolution.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f13.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FA2"><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d2e5394">Same as Fig. A1, but driven by ERA5 at 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° spatial and 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temporal resolution.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4749/2026/acp-26-4749-2026-f14.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5424">Sentinel-5P TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Level-2 OFFL data were obtained from the Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem; the product DOI is <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/S5P-74eidii" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/S5P-74eidii</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.64"/>. ERA5 reanalysis was retrieved from the Copernicus Climate Data Store. We used the “ERA5-complete” dataset on the native grid including model levels (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.143582cf" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.143582cf</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.65"/>). POPS (Baseline Balloon Stratospheric Aerosol Profiles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAP</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) 1 Hz time series were downloaded from NOAA CSL (<uri>https://csl.noaa.gov/projects/b2sap/data.html</uri>, last access: 3 July 2025). Balloon sounding measurements from the SWOP campaign over Lhasa are available upon request from Jianchun Bian (bjc@mail.iap.ac.cn).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5470">ZY, BV, and FP jointly developed the study concept; BV and FP provided the initial idea and scientific guidance throughout; ZY performed the simulations and analyzed the data and results; BV contributed key components of the CLaMS simulation code; FP contributed the CLaMS code for the global three-dimensional tracer simulations; JCB, ZXB, and DL conducted the balloon-borne measurements at Lhasa; SG and LH provided the TROPOMI data; FGW provided technical support for the COBALD instrument/data; EA, AAB, KRS, and TT provided technical support for the POPS data; MIH contributed to the review and editing of the manuscript; ZY wrote the manuscript with input from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5480">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5486">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5492">We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their thorough and constructive reviews.</p><p id="d2e5494">This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG grant no. VO 1276/6-1) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant 42061134012) in the frame of a joint NSFC-DFG research project as well as by the NSFC Grant 42394121. We acknowledge the Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC; Research Centre Jülich, Germany) for computing time on the supercomputer JUWELS (project CLaMS-ESM) and storage resources on the meteocloud data archive. Further, we thank the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for providing the ERA5 reanalyses.</p><p id="d2e5496">Balloon measurements over Boulder are supported by the NOAA cooperative agreement NA22OAR4320151, the Earth Radiation Budget (ERB) project, and the NASA Upper Atmosphere Composition Observations (UACO) program. Katie Smith and Alexandre Baron would like to acknowledge Reflective for supporting this research through their fellowship program.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5501">This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. VO 1276/6-1) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42061134012) in the frame of a joint NSFC-DFG research project, as well as by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42394121).The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Forschungszentrum Jülich.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5513">This paper was edited by Stefano Galmarini and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Appel et al.(2022)Appel, Köllner, Dragoneas, Hünig, Molleker, Schlager, Mahnke, Weigel, Port, Schulz, Drewnick, Vogel, Stroh, and Borrmann</label><mixed-citation>Appel, O., Köllner, F., Dragoneas, A., Hünig, A., Molleker, S., Schlager, H., Mahnke, C., Weigel, R., Port, M., Schulz, C., Drewnick, F., Vogel, B., Stroh, F., and Borrmann, S.: Chemical analysis of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer (ATAL) with emphasis on secondary aerosol particles using aircraft-based in situ aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13607–13630, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13607-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13607-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bian et al.(2012)Bian, Pan, Paulik, Vömel, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>Bian, J., Pan, L. L., Paulik, L., Vömel, H., and Chen, H.: In situ water vapor and ozone measurements in Lhasa and Kunmin during the Asian summer monsoon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L19808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052996" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052996</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bourassa et al.(2012)Bourassa, Robock, Randel, Deshler, Rieger, Lloyd, Llewellyn, and Degenstein</label><mixed-citation> Bourassa, A. E., Robock, A., Randel, W. J., Deshler, T., Rieger, L. A., Lloyd, N. D., Llewellyn, E., and Degenstein, D. A.: Large volcanic aerosol load in the stratosphere linked to Asian monsoon transport, Science, 337, 78–81, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Brabec et al.(2012)Brabec, Wienhold, Luo, Vömel, Immler, Steiner, Hausammann, Weers, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Brabec, M., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Vömel, H., Immler, F., Steiner, P., Hausammann, E., Weers, U., and Peter, T.: Particle backscatter and relative humidity measured across cirrus clouds and comparison with microphysical cirrus modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9135–9148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9135-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9135-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Brewer(1949)</label><mixed-citation>Brewer, A. W.: Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 75, 351–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49707532603</ext-link>, 1949.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Brunamonti et al.(2018)Brunamonti, Jorge, Oelsner, Hanumanthu, Singh, Kumar, Sonbawne, Meier, Singh, Wienhold, Luo, Boettcher, Poltera, Jauhiainen, Kayastha, Karmacharya, Dirksen, Naja, Rex, Fadnavis, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Brunamonti, S., Jorge, T., Oelsner, P., Hanumanthu, S., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Meier, S., Singh, D., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Boettcher, M., Poltera, Y., Jauhiainen, H., Kayastha, R., Karmacharya, J., Dirksen, R., Naja, M., Rex, M., Fadnavis, S., and Peter, T.: Balloon-borne measurements of temperature, water vapor, ozone and aerosol backscatter on the southern slopes of the Himalayas during StratoClim 2016–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15937–15957, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Brunamonti et al.(2021)Brunamonti, Martucci, Romanens, Poltera, Wienhold, Hervo, Haefele, and Navas-Guzmán</label><mixed-citation>Brunamonti, S., Martucci, G., Romanens, G., Poltera, Y., Wienhold, F. G., Hervo, M., Haefele, A., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Validation of aerosol backscatter profiles from Raman lidar and ceilometer using balloon-borne measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2267–2285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Butchart(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Butchart, N.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation, Rev. Geophys., 52, 157–184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000448" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013RG000448</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Cai et al.(2022)Cai, Griessbach, and Hoffmann</label><mixed-citation>Cai, Z., Griessbach, S., and Hoffmann, L.: Improved estimation of volcanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> injections from satellite retrievals and Lagrangian transport simulations: the 2019 Raikoke eruption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6787–6809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6787-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-6787-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Carn et al.(2022)Carn, Krotkov, Fisher, and Li</label><mixed-citation>Carn, S., Krotkov, N., Fisher, B., and Li, C.: Out of the blue: Volcanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions during the 2021–2022 eruptions of Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai (Tonga), Front. Earth Sci., 10, 976962, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.976962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2022.976962</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Cirisan et al.(2014)Cirisan, Luo, Engel, Wienhold, Sprenger, Krieger, Weers, Romanens, Levrat, Jeannet, Ruffieux, Philipona, Calpini, Spichtinger, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Cirisan, A., Luo, B. P., Engel, I., Wienhold, F. G., Sprenger, M., Krieger, U. K., Weers, U., Romanens, G., Levrat, G., Jeannet, P., Ruffieux, D., Philipona, R., Calpini, B., Spichtinger, P., and Peter, T.: Balloon-borne match measurements of midlatitude cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7341–7365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7341-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7341-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Clemens et al.(2024)Clemens, Vogel, Hoffmann, Griessbach, Thomas, Fadnavis, Müller, Peter, and Ploeger</label><mixed-citation>Clemens, J., Vogel, B., Hoffmann, L., Griessbach, S., Thomas, N., Fadnavis, S., Müller, R., Peter, T., and Ploeger, F.: A multi-scenario Lagrangian trajectory analysis to identify source regions of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer on the Indian subcontinent in August 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 763–787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-763-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-763-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Copernicus Sentinel-5P(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Copernicus Sentinel-5P (processed by ESA): TROPOMI Level 2 Sulfur Dioxide Total Column products, Version 02, European Space Agency [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/S5P-74eidii" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/S5P-74eidii</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>de Leeuw et al.(2021)de Leeuw, Schmidt, Witham, Theys, Taylor, Grainger, Pope, Haywood, Osborne, and Kristiansen</label><mixed-citation>de Leeuw, J., Schmidt, A., Witham, C. S., Theys, N., Taylor, I. A., Grainger, R. G., Pope, R. J., Haywood, J., Osborne, M., and Kristiansen, N. I.: The 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption – Part 1: Dispersion model simulations and satellite retrievals of volcanic sulfur dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10851–10879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10851-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-10851-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Dobson(1956)</label><mixed-citation> Dobson, G. M. B.: Origin and distribution of polyatomic molecules in the atmosphere, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 236, 187–193, 1956.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Fadnavis et al.(2014)Fadnavis, Schultz, Semeniuk, Mahajan, Pozzoli, Sonbawne, Ghude, Kiefer, and Eckert</label><mixed-citation>Fadnavis, S., Schultz, M. G., Semeniuk, K., Mahajan, A. S., Pozzoli, L., Sonbawne, S., Ghude, S. D., Kiefer, M., and Eckert, E.: Trends in peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere over southern Asia during the summer monsoon season: regional impacts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12725–12743, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12725-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12725-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Fahey et al.(2014)Fahey, Gao, Möhler, Saathoff, Schiller, Ebert, Krämer, Peter, Amarouche, Avallone, Bauer, Bozóki, Christensen, Davis, Durry, Dyroff, Herman, Hunsmann, Khaykin, Mackrodt, Meyer, Smith, Spelten, Troy, Vömel, Wagner, and Wienhold</label><mixed-citation>Fahey, D. W., Gao, R.-S., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schiller, C., Ebert, V., Krämer, M., Peter, T., Amarouche, N., Avallone, L. M., Bauer, R., Bozóki, Z., Christensen, L. E., Davis, S. M., Durry, G., Dyroff, C., Herman, R. L., Hunsmann, S., Khaykin, S. M., Mackrodt, P., Meyer, J., Smith, J. B., Spelten, N., Troy, R. F., Vömel, H., Wagner, S., and Wienhold, F. G.: The AquaVIT-1 intercomparison of atmospheric water vapor measurement techniques, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3177–3213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3177-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3177-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Fromm et al.(2013)Fromm, Nedoluha, and Charvát</label><mixed-citation>Fromm, M., Nedoluha, G., and Charvát, Z.: Comment on “Large Volcanic Aerosol Load in the Stratosphere Linked to Asian Monsoon Transport”, Science, 339, 647, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228605" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1228605</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Gao et al.(2016)Gao, Telg, McLaughlin, Ciciora, Watts, Richardson, Schwarz, Perring, Thornberry, Rollins, Markovic, Bates, Johnson, and Fahey</label><mixed-citation>Gao, R. S., Telg, H., McLaughlin, R. J., Ciciora, S. J., Watts, L. A., Richardson, M. S., Schwarz, J. P., Perring, A. E., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Markovic, M. Z., Bates, T. S., Johnson, J. E., and Fahey, D. W.: A light-weight, high-sensitivity particle spectrometer for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 88–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1131809" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2015.1131809</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Gorkavyi et al.(2021)Gorkavyi, Krotkov, Li, Lait, Colarco, Carn, DeLand, Newman, Schoeberl, Taha, Torres, Vasilkov, and Joiner</label><mixed-citation>Gorkavyi, N., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Lait, L., Colarco, P., Carn, S., DeLand, M., Newman, P., Schoeberl, M., Taha, G., Torres, O., Vasilkov, A., and Joiner, J.: Tracking aerosols and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> clouds from the Raikoke eruption: 3D view from satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7545–7563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>GRUAN Lead Centre(2025)</label><mixed-citation>GRUAN Lead Centre: InterMet iMet-1 (iMet-1-RSB) – GRUAN instrument information (radiosonde models), <uri>https://www.gruan.org/instruments/radiosondes/sonde-models/intermet-imet-1</uri> (last access: 13 January 2026), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Hanumanthu et al.(2020)Hanumanthu, Vogel, Müller, Brunamonti, Fadnavis, Li, Ölsner, Naja, Singh, Kumar, Sonbawne, Jauhiainen, Vömel, Luo, Jorge, Wienhold, Dirkson, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Hanumanthu, S., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Brunamonti, S., Fadnavis, S., Li, D., Ölsner, P., Naja, M., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Jauhiainen, H., Vömel, H., Luo, B., Jorge, T., Wienhold, F. G., Dirkson, R., and Peter, T.: Strong day-to-day variability of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer (ATAL) in August 2016 at the Himalayan foothills, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14273–14302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14273-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-14273-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>He et al.(2024)He, Jing, Yin, Ohneiser, and Yi</label><mixed-citation>He, Y., Jing, D., Yin, Z., Ohneiser, K., and Yi, F.: Long-term (2010–2021) lidar observations of stratospheric aerosols in Wuhan, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11431–11450, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11431-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-11431-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Hersbach et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R.J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: Complete ERA5 from 1940: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Data Store (CDS) [data set],  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.143582cf" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.143582cf</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara, Horànyi, Muñoz Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Abdalla, Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita, De Chiara, Dahlgren, Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hogan, Hólm, Janiskovà, Keeley, Laloyaux, Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti, de Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horànyi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janiskovà, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hofmann and Solomon(1989)</label><mixed-citation> Hofmann, D. J. and Solomon, S.: Ozone destruction through heterogeneous chemistry following the eruption of El Chichón, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 5029–5041, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Jing et al.(2023)Jing, He, Yin, Liu, Yi, and Yi</label><mixed-citation>Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Liu, F., Yi, Y., and Yi, F.: Evolution of aerosol plumes from 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption observed with polarization lidar over central China, Atmos. Environ., 309, 119880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119880</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Khaykin et al.(2022)Khaykin, De Laat, Godin-Beekmann, Hauchecorne, and Ratynski</label><mixed-citation>Khaykin, S. M., De Laat, A. J., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hauchecorne, A., and Ratynski, M.: Unexpected self-lofting and dynamical confinement of volcanic plumes: the Raikoke 2019 case, Scientific Reports, 12, 22409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27021-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-022-27021-0</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Kloss et al.(2021)Kloss, Berthet, Sellitto, Ploeger, Taha, Tidiga, Eremenko, Bossolasco, Jégou, Renard, and Legras</label><mixed-citation>Kloss, C., Berthet, G., Sellitto, P., Ploeger, F., Taha, G., Tidiga, M., Eremenko, M., Bossolasco, A., Jégou, F., Renard, J.-B., and Legras, B.: Stratospheric aerosol layer perturbation caused by the 2019 Raikoke and Ulawun eruptions and their radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 535–560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-535-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Konopka et al.(2004)Konopka, Steinhorst, Grooß, Günther, Müller, Elkins, Jost, Richard, Schmidt, Toon, and McKenna</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Steinhorst, H.-M., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R., Elkins, J. W., Jost, H.-J., Richard, E., Schmidt, U., Toon, G., and McKenna, D. S.: Mixing and Ozone Loss in the 1999-2000 Arctic Vortex: Simulations with the 3-dimensional Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), J. Geophys. Res., 109, D02315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003792" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003792</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Konopka et al.(2007)Konopka, Günther, Müller, dos Santos, Schiller, Ravegnani, Ulanovsky, Schlager, Volk, Viciani, Pan, McKenna, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Günther, G., Müller, R., dos Santos, F. H. S., Schiller, C., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., Schlager, H., Volk, C. M., Viciani, S., Pan, L. L., McKenna, D.-S., and Riese, M.: Contribution of mixing to upward transport across the tropical tropopause layer (TTL), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3285–3308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3285-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3285-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Konopka et al.(2009)Konopka, Grooß, Plöger, and Müller</label><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Plöger, F., and Müller, R.: Annual cycle of horizontal in-mixing into the lower tropical stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D19111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011955" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD011955</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Li et al.(2017)Li, Vogel, Bian, Müller, Pan, Günther, Bai, Li, Zhang, Fan, and Vömel</label><mixed-citation>Li, D., Vogel, B., Bian, J., Müller, R., Pan, L. L., Günther, G., Bai, Z., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Fan, Q., and Vömel, H.: Impact of typhoons on the composition of the upper troposphere within the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone: the SWOP campaign in Lhasa 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4657–4672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4657-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4657-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Li et al.(2018)Li, Vogel, Müller, Bian, Günther, Li, Zhang, Bai, Vömel, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Li, D., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Bian, J., Günther, G., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Bai, Z., Vömel, H., and Riese, M.: High tropospheric ozone in Lhasa within the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone in 2013: influence of convective transport and stratospheric intrusions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17979–17994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17979-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17979-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Li et al.(2020)Li, Vogel, Müller, Bian, Günther, Ploeger, Li, Zhang, Bai, Vömel, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Li, D., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Bian, J., Günther, G., Ploeger, F., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Bai, Z., Vömel, H., and Riese, M.: Dehydration and low ozone in the tropopause layer over the Asian monsoon caused by tropical cyclones: Lagrangian transport calculations using ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalysis data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4133–4152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Ma et al.(2022)Ma, Bian, Li, Bai, Li, Zhang, Wang, Zheng, Hurst, and Vömel</label><mixed-citation>Ma, D., Bian, J., Li, D., Bai, Z., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Wang, H., Zheng, X., Hurst, D. F., and Vömel, H.: Mixing characteristics within the tropopause transition layer over the Asian summer monsoon region based on ozone and water vapor sounding data, Atmos. Res., 271, 106093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106093</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Masson-Delmotte et al.(2021)Masson-Delmotte, Zhai, Pirani, Connors, Péan, Berger, Caud, Chen, Goldfarb, Gomis, Huang, Leitzell, Lonnoy, Matthews, Maycock, Waterfield, Yelekçi, Yu, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B. (Eds.): Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>McCormick et al.(1995)McCormick, Thomason, and Trepte</label><mixed-citation> McCormick, M. P., Thomason, L. W., and Trepte, C. R.: Atmospheric effects of the Mt Pinatubo eruption, Nature, 373, 399–404, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>McKenna et al.(2002)McKenna, Konopka, Grooß, Günther, Müller, Spang, Offermann, and Orsolini</label><mixed-citation>McKenna, D. S., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R., Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.: A new Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS): 1. Formulation of advection and mixing, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000114</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Minnis et al.(1993)Minnis, Harrison, Stowe, Gibson, Denn, Doelling, and Smith Jr</label><mixed-citation> Minnis, P., Harrison, E., Stowe, L., Gibson, G., Denn, F., Doelling, D., and Smith Jr, W.: Radiative climate forcing by the Mount Pinatubo eruption, Science, 259, 1411–1415, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Murphy and Koop(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Murphy, D. M. and Koop, T.: Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.Soc., 131, 1539–1565, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Muser et al.(2020)Muser, Hoshyaripour, Bruckert, Horváth, Malinina, Wallis, Prata, Rozanov, von Savigny, Vogel et al.</label><mixed-citation>Muser, L. O., Hoshyaripour, G. A., Bruckert, J., Horváth, Á., Malinina, E., Wallis, S., Prata, F. J., Rozanov, A., von Savigny, C., Vogel, H., and Vogel, B.: Particle aging and aerosol–radiation interaction affect volcanic plume dispersion: evidence from the Raikoke 2019 eruption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15015–15036, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15015-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-15015-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Park et al.(2007)Park, Randel, Gettleman, Massie, and Jiang</label><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Gettleman, A., Massie, S. T., and Jiang, J. H.: Transport above the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone inferred from Aura Microwave Limb Sounder tracers, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008294</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Ploeger et al.(2015)Ploeger, Gottschling, Grießbach, Grooß, Günther, Konopka, Müller, Riese, Stroh, Tao, Ungermann, Vogel, and von Hobe</label><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Gottschling, C., Griessbach, S., Grooß, J.-U., Guenther, G., Konopka, P., Müller, R., Riese, M., Stroh, F., Tao, M., Ungermann, J., Vogel, B., and von Hobe, M.: A potential vorticity-based determination of the transport barrier in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13145–13159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Ploeger et al.(2021)Ploeger, Diallo, Charlesworth, Konopka, Legras, Laube, Grooß, Günther, Engel, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Diallo, M., Charlesworth, E., Konopka, P., Legras, B., Laube, J. C., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Engel, A., and Riese, M.: The stratospheric Brewer–Dobson circulation inferred from age of air in the ERA5 reanalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8393–8412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8393-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-8393-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Poltera et al.(2025)Poltera, Luo, Wienhold, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Poltera, Y., Luo, B., Wienhold, F. G., and Peter, T.: The “Golden Points” and nonequilibrium correction of high-accuracy frost point hygrometers, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2025-2003</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Pommrich et al.(2014)Pommrich, Müller, Grooß, Konopka, Ploeger, Vogel, Tao, Hoppe, Günther, Spelten, Hoffmann, Pumphrey, Viciani, D'Amato, Volk, Hoor, Schlager, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Pommrich, R., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Konopka, P., Ploeger, F., Vogel, B., Tao, M., Hoppe, C. M., Günther, G., Spelten, N., Hoffmann, L., Pumphrey, H.-C., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Volk, C. M., Hoor, P., Schlager, H., and Riese, M.: Tropical troposphere to stratosphere transport of carbon monoxide and long-lived trace species in the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2895–2916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Portmann et al.(1996)Portmann, Solomon, Garcia, Thomason, Poole, and McCormick</label><mixed-citation> Portmann, R. W., Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R., Thomason, L. W., Poole, L. R., and McCormick, M. P.: Role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone depletion in the polar regions, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 22991–23006, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Randel et al.(2010)Randel, Park, Emmons, Kinnison, Bernath, Walker, Boone, and Pumphrey</label><mixed-citation>Randel, W. J., Park, M., Emmons, L., Kinnison, D., Bernath, P., Walker, K. A., Boone, C., and Pumphrey, H.: Asian Monsoon Transport of Pollution to the Stratosphere, Science, 328, 611–613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182274" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1182274</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Reinares Martínez et al.(2021)Reinares Martínez, Evan, Wienhold, Brioude, Jensen, Thornberry, Héron, Verreyken, Körner, Vömel et al.</label><mixed-citation>Reinares Martínez, I., Evan, S., Wienhold, F. G., Brioude, J., Jensen, E. J., Thornberry, T. D., Héron, D., Verreyken, B., Körner, S., Vömel, H., Metzger, J.-M., and Posny, F.: Unprecedented observations of a nascent in situ cirrus in the tropical tropopause layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL090936, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090936" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL090936</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Santee et al.(2017)Santee, Manney, Livesey, Schwartz, Neu, and Read</label><mixed-citation>Santee, M. L., Manney, G. L., Livesey, N. J., Schwartz, M. J., Neu, J. L., and Read, W. G.: A comprehensive overview of the climatological composition of the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone based on 10 years of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 5491–5514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD026408</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Schmidt and Black(2022)</label><mixed-citation> Schmidt, A. and Black, B. A.: Reckoning with the rocky relationship between eruption size and climate response: toward a volcano-climate index, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 50, 627–661, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Schmidt et al.(2018)Schmidt, Mills, Ghan, Gregory, Allan, Andrews, Bardeen, Conley, Forster, Gettelman et al.</label><mixed-citation> Schmidt, A., Mills, M. J., Ghan, S., Gregory, J. M., Allan, R. P., Andrews, T., Bardeen, C. G., Conley, A., Forster, P. M., Gettelman, A., Portmann, R. W., Solomon, S., and Toon, O. B.: Volcanic radiative forcing from 1979 to 2015, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 12491–12508, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Solomon(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history, Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999RG900008</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Solomon et al.(2011)Solomon, Daniel, Neely, Vernier, Dutton, and Thomason</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely, R. R., Vernier, J.-P., Dutton, E. G., and Thomason, L. W.: The Persistently Variable “Background” Stratospheric Aerosol Layer and Global Climate Change, Science, 333, 866–870, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1206027</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Solomon et al.(2016)Solomon, Ivy, Kinnison, Mills, Neely, and Schmidt</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Ivy, D. J., Kinnison, D., Mills, M. J., Neely, R. R., and Schmidt, A.: Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer, Science, 353, 269–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aae0061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aae0061</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Tabazadeh et al.(2002)Tabazadeh, Drdla, Schoeberl, Hamill, and Toon</label><mixed-citation> Tabazadeh, A., Drdla, K., Schoeberl, M. R., Hamill, P., and Toon, O. B.: Arctic “ozone hole” in a cold volcanic stratosphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 2609–2612, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Theys et al.(2017)Theys, De Smedt, Yu, Danckaert, van Gent, Hörmann, Wagner, Hedelt, Bauer, Romahn et al.</label><mixed-citation>Theys, N., De Smedt, I., Yu, H., Danckaert, T., van Gent, J., Hörmann, C., Wagner, T., Hedelt, P., Bauer, H., Romahn, F., Pedergnana, M., Loyola, D., and Van Roozendael, M.: Sulfur dioxide retrievals from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor: algorithm theoretical basis, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 119–153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-119-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-119-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Theys et al.(2024)Theys, Smedt, Lerot, Vlietinck, Yu, Roozendael, Hedelt, and Romahn</label><mixed-citation>Theys, N., Smedt, I. D., Lerot, C., Vlietinck, J., Yu, H., Roozendael, M. V., Hedelt, P., and Romahn, F.: Sentinel-5P/TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Level-2 Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, 87 pp., <uri>https://sentinels.copernicus.eu/documents/247904/2476257/Sentinel-5P-ATBD-SO2-TROPOMI.pdf</uri> (last access: 25 March 2026), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Thompson and Solomon(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, D. W. J. and Solomon, S.: Understanding Recent Stratospheric Climate Change, J. Climate, 22, 1934–1943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2482.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008JCLI2482.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Todt et al.(2023)Todt, Asher, Hall, Cullis, Jordan, Xiong, Hurst, and Thornberry</label><mixed-citation>Todt, M. A., Asher, E., Hall, E., Cullis, P., Jordan, A., Xiong, K., Hurst, D. F., and Thornberry, T.: Baseline Balloon Stratospheric Aerosol Profiles (B2SAP)–Systematic Measurements of Aerosol Number Density and Size, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD038041, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD038041</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Toohey et al.(2025)Toohey, Jia, Khanal, and Tegtmeier</label><mixed-citation>Toohey, M., Jia, Y., Khanal, S., and Tegtmeier, S.: Stratospheric residence time and the lifetime of volcanic stratospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3821–3839, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3821-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-3821-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Veefkind et al.(2012)Veefkind, Aben, McMullan, Förster, De Vries, Otter, Claas, Eskes, De Haan, Kleipool et al.</label><mixed-citation> Veefkind, J. P., Aben, I., McMullan, K., Förster, H., de Vries, J., Otter, G., Claas, J., Eskes, H. J., de Haan, J. F., Kleipool, Q., van Weele, M., Hasekamp, O., Hoogeveen, R., Landgraf, J., Snel, R., Tol, P., Ingmann, P., Voors, R., Kruizinga, B., Vink, R., Visser, H., and Levelt, P. F.: TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 70–83, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Vernier et al.(2013)Vernier, Thomason, Fairlie, Minnis, Bedka, and Palikonda</label><mixed-citation>Vernier, J., Thomason, L. W., Fairlie, T. D., Minnis, P., Bedka, K. M., and Palikonda, R.: Comment on “Large Volcanic Aerosol Load in the Stratosphere Linked to Asian Monsoon Transport”, Science, 339, 647, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1227817</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Vernier et al.(2015)Vernier, Fairlie, Natarajan, Wienhold, Bian, Martinsson, Crumeyrolle, Thomason, and Bedka</label><mixed-citation>Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J., Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.: Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and its potential connection with Asian pollution, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 1608–1619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022372</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Vernier et al.(2018)Vernier, Fairlie, Deshler, Ratnam, Gadhavi, Kumar, Natarajan, Pandit, Raj, Kumar, Jayaraman, Singh, Rastogi, Sinha, Kumar, Tiwari, Wegner, Baker, Vignelles, Stenchikov, Shevchenko, Smith, Bedka, Kesarkar, Singh, Bhate, Ravikiran, Rao, Ravindrababu, Patel, Vernier, Wienhold, Liu, Knepp, Thomason, Crawford, Ziemba, Moore, Crumeyrolle, Williamson, Berthet, Jégou, and Renard</label><mixed-citation>Vernier, J.-P., Fairlie, T. D., Deshler, T., Ratnam, M. V., Gadhavi, H., Kumar, B. S., Natarajan, M., Pandit, A. K., Raj, S. T. A., Kumar, A. H., Jayaraman, A., Singh, A. K., Rastogi, N., Sinha, P. R., Kumar, S., Tiwari, S., Wegner, T., Baker, N., Vignelles, D., Stenchikov, G., Shevchenko, I., Smith, J., Bedka, K., Kesarkar, A., Singh, V., Bhate, J., Ravikiran, V., Rao, M. D., Ravindrababu, S., Patel, A., Vernier, H., Wienhold, F. G., Liu, H., Knepp, T. N., Thomason, L., Crawford, J., Ziemba, L., Moore, J., Crumeyrolle, S., Williamson, M., Berthet, G., Jégou, F., and Renard, J.-B.: BATAL: The Balloon Measurement Campaigns of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 955–973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0014.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0014.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Vernier et al.(2024)Vernier, Aubry, Timmreck, Schmidt, Clarisse, Prata, Theys, Prata, Mann, Choi et al.</label><mixed-citation>Vernier, J.-P., Aubry, T. J., Timmreck, C., Schmidt, A., Clarisse, L., Prata, F., Theys, N., Prata, A. T., Mann, G., Choi, H., Carn, S., Rigby, R., Loughlin, S. C., and Stevenson, J. A.: The 2019 Raikoke eruption as a testbed used by the Volcano Response group for rapid assessment of volcanic atmospheric impacts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5765–5782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5765-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-5765-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Vogel et al.(2016)Vogel, Günther, Müller, Grooß, Afchine, Bozem, Hoor, Krämer, Müller, Riese, Rolf, Spelten, Stiller, Ungermann, and Zahn</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Afchine, A., Bozem, H., Hoor, P., Krämer, M., Müller, S., Riese, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Stiller, G. P., Ungermann, J., and Zahn, A.: Long-range transport pathways of tropospheric source gases originating in Asia into the northern lower stratosphere during the Asian monsoon season 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15301–15325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15301-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15301-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Vogel et al.(2019)Vogel, Müller, Günther, Spang, Hanumanthu, Li, Riese, and Stiller</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Müller, R., Günther, G., Spang, R., Hanumanthu, S., Li, D., Riese, M., and Stiller, G. P.: Lagrangian simulations of the transport of young air masses to the top of the Asian monsoon anticyclone and into the tropical pipe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6007–6034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Vogel et al.(2024)Vogel, Volk, Wintel, Lauther, Clemens, Grooß, Günther, Hoffmann, Laube, Müller et al.</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Volk, C. M., Wintel, J., Lauther, V., Clemens, J., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Hoffmann, L., Laube, J. C., Müller, R., Ploeger, F., and Stroh, F.: Evaluation of vertical transport in ERA5 and ERA-Interim reanalysis using high-altitude aircraft measurements in the Asian summer monsoon 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 317–343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-317-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-317-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Vogel et al.(2025)Vogel, Lauther, Köllner, Ekinci, Rolf, Strobel, van Luijt, Volk, Borrmann, Dragoneas, Eppers, Molleker, Hoor, Ort, Weyland, Zahn, Clemens, Günther, Kachula, Müller, Ploeger, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, B., Lauther, V., Köllner, F., Ekinci, F., Rolf, C., Strobel, J., van Luijt, R., Volk, M. C., Borrmann, S., Dragoneas, A., Eppers, O., Molleker, S., Hoor, P., Ort, L., Weyland, F., Zahn, A., Clemens, J., Günther, G., Kachula, O., Müller, R., Ploeger, F., and Riese, M.: Continental and marine source regions contributing to the outflow of the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone during the PHILEAS campaign in summer 2023, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5609" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2025-5609</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Vömel et al.(2016)Vömel, Naebert, Dirksen, and Sommer</label><mixed-citation>Vömel, H., Naebert, T., Dirksen, R., and Sommer, M.: An update on the uncertainties of water vapor measurements using cryogenic frost point hygrometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3755–3768, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3755-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-3755-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Wu et al.(2023)Wu, Qiao, Chen, Wang, Hoffmann, Griessbach, Tian, and Wang</label><mixed-citation> Wu, X., Qiao, Q., Chen, B., Wang, X., Hoffmann, L., Griessbach, S., Tian, Y., and Wang, Y.: The influence of the Asian summer monsoon on volcanic aerosol transport in the UTLS region, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 6, 11, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Yang et al.(2023)Yang, Li, Luo, Tian, Bai, Li, Zhang, Wang, Zheng, Vömel et al.</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Z., Li, D., Luo, J., Tian, W., Bai, Z., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Wang, H., Zheng, X., Vömel, H., Wienhold, F. G., Peter, T., Hurst, D., and Bian, J.: Determination of cirrus occurrence and distribution characteristics over the Tibetan Plateau based on the SWOP campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037682, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037682" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD037682</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Yu et al.(2017)Yu, Rosenlof, Liu, Telg, Thornberry, Rollins, Portmann, Bai, Ray, Duan, Pan, Toon, Bian, and Gao</label><mixed-citation>Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Liu, S., Telg, H., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Portmann, R. W., Bai, Z., Ray, E. A., Duan, Y., Pan, L. L., Toon, O. B., Bian, J., and Gao, R.-S.: Efficient transport of tropospheric aerosol into the stratosphere via the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 6972–6977, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701170114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1701170114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Yu et al.(2023)Yu, Portmann, Peng, Liu, Zhu, Asher, Bai, Lu, Bian, Mills et al.</label><mixed-citation> Yu, P., Portmann, R. W., Peng, Y., Liu, C.-C., Zhu, Y., Asher, E., Bai, Z., Lu, Y., Bian, J., Mills, M. J., Schmidt, A., Rosenlof, K. H., and Toon, O. B.: Radiative forcing from the 2014–2022 volcanic and wildfire injections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103791, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Zhu et al.(2022)Zhu, Bardeen, Tilmes, Mills, Wang, Harvey, Taha, Kinnison, Portmann, Yu et al.</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y., Bardeen, C. G., Tilmes, S., Mills, M. J., Wang, X., Harvey, V. L., Taha, G., Kinnison, D., Portmann, R. W., Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Avery, M., Kloss, C., Li, C., Glanville, A. S., Millán, L., Deshler, T., Krotkov, N., and Toon, O. B.: Perturbations in stratospheric aerosol evolution due to the water-rich plume of the 2022 Hunga-Tonga eruption, Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 3, 248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00580-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-022-00580-w</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Zuev et al.(2015)Zuev, Zueva, Savelieva, and Gerasimov</label><mixed-citation>Zuev, V., Zueva, N., Savelieva, E., and Gerasimov, V.: The Antarctic ozone depletion caused by Erebus volcano gas emissions, Atmos. Environ., 122, 393–399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Transport of volcanic aerosol from the Raikoke eruption in 2019 through the Northern Hemisphere</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Appel et al.(2022)Appel, Köllner, Dragoneas, Hünig, Molleker, Schlager, Mahnke, Weigel, Port, Schulz, Drewnick, Vogel, Stroh, and Borrmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Appel, O., Köllner, F., Dragoneas, A., Hünig, A., Molleker, S., Schlager, H., Mahnke, C., Weigel, R., Port, M., Schulz, C., Drewnick, F., Vogel, B., Stroh, F., and Borrmann, S.:
Chemical analysis of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer (ATAL) with emphasis on secondary aerosol particles using aircraft-based in situ aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13607–13630, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13607-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13607-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bian et al.(2012)Bian, Pan, Paulik, Vömel, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bian, J., Pan, L. L., Paulik, L., Vömel, H., and Chen, H.:
In situ water vapor and ozone measurements in Lhasa and Kunmin during the Asian summer monsoon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L19808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052996" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052996</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bourassa et al.(2012)Bourassa, Robock, Randel, Deshler, Rieger, Lloyd, Llewellyn, and Degenstein</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bourassa, A. E., Robock, A., Randel, W. J., Deshler, T., Rieger, L. A., Lloyd, N. D., Llewellyn, E., and Degenstein, D. A.:
Large volcanic aerosol load in the stratosphere linked to Asian monsoon transport, Science, 337, 78–81, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Brabec et al.(2012)Brabec, Wienhold, Luo, Vömel, Immler, Steiner, Hausammann, Weers, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brabec, M., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Vömel, H., Immler, F., Steiner, P., Hausammann, E., Weers, U., and Peter, T.:
Particle backscatter and relative humidity measured across cirrus clouds and comparison with microphysical cirrus modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9135–9148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9135-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9135-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Brewer(1949)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brewer, A. W.:
Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 75, 351–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603</a>, 1949.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Brunamonti et al.(2018)Brunamonti, Jorge, Oelsner, Hanumanthu, Singh, Kumar, Sonbawne, Meier, Singh, Wienhold, Luo, Boettcher, Poltera, Jauhiainen, Kayastha, Karmacharya, Dirksen, Naja, Rex, Fadnavis, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brunamonti, S., Jorge, T., Oelsner, P., Hanumanthu, S., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Meier, S., Singh, D., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Boettcher, M., Poltera, Y., Jauhiainen, H., Kayastha, R., Karmacharya, J., Dirksen, R., Naja, M., Rex, M., Fadnavis, S., and Peter, T.:
Balloon-borne measurements of temperature, water vapor, ozone and aerosol backscatter on the southern slopes of the Himalayas during StratoClim 2016–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15937–15957, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Brunamonti et al.(2021)Brunamonti, Martucci, Romanens, Poltera, Wienhold, Hervo, Haefele, and Navas-Guzmán</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brunamonti, S., Martucci, G., Romanens, G., Poltera, Y., Wienhold, F. G., Hervo, M., Haefele, A., and Navas-Guzmán, F.:
Validation of aerosol backscatter profiles from Raman lidar and ceilometer using balloon-borne measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2267–2285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Butchart(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Butchart, N.:
The Brewer-Dobson circulation, Rev. Geophys., 52, 157–184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000448" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000448</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Cai et al.(2022)Cai, Griessbach, and Hoffmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, Z., Griessbach, S., and Hoffmann, L.:
Improved estimation of volcanic SO<sub>2</sub> injections from satellite retrievals and Lagrangian transport simulations: the 2019 Raikoke eruption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6787–6809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6787-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6787-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Carn et al.(2022)Carn, Krotkov, Fisher, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carn, S., Krotkov, N., Fisher, B., and Li, C.:
Out of the blue: Volcanic SO<sub>2</sub> emissions during the 2021–2022 eruptions of Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai (Tonga), Front. Earth Sci., 10, 976962, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.976962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.976962</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Cirisan et al.(2014)Cirisan, Luo, Engel, Wienhold, Sprenger, Krieger, Weers, Romanens, Levrat, Jeannet, Ruffieux, Philipona, Calpini, Spichtinger, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cirisan, A., Luo, B. P., Engel, I., Wienhold, F. G., Sprenger, M., Krieger, U. K., Weers, U., Romanens, G., Levrat, G., Jeannet, P., Ruffieux, D., Philipona, R., Calpini, B., Spichtinger, P., and Peter, T.:
Balloon-borne match measurements of midlatitude cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7341–7365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7341-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7341-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Clemens et al.(2024)Clemens, Vogel, Hoffmann, Griessbach, Thomas, Fadnavis, Müller, Peter, and Ploeger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clemens, J., Vogel, B., Hoffmann, L., Griessbach, S., Thomas, N., Fadnavis, S., Müller, R., Peter, T., and Ploeger, F.:
A multi-scenario Lagrangian trajectory analysis to identify source regions of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer on the Indian subcontinent in August 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 763–787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-763-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-763-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Copernicus Sentinel-5P(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Copernicus Sentinel-5P (processed by ESA): TROPOMI Level 2 Sulfur Dioxide Total Column products, Version 02, European Space Agency [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5270/S5P-74eidii" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5270/S5P-74eidii</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>de Leeuw et al.(2021)de Leeuw, Schmidt, Witham, Theys, Taylor, Grainger, Pope, Haywood, Osborne, and Kristiansen</label><mixed-citation>
      
de Leeuw, J., Schmidt, A., Witham, C. S., Theys, N., Taylor, I. A., Grainger, R. G., Pope, R. J., Haywood, J., Osborne, M., and Kristiansen, N. I.:
The 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption – Part 1: Dispersion model simulations and satellite retrievals of volcanic sulfur dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10851–10879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10851-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10851-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Dobson(1956)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dobson, G. M. B.:
Origin and distribution of polyatomic molecules in the atmosphere, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 236, 187–193, 1956.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Fadnavis et al.(2014)Fadnavis, Schultz, Semeniuk, Mahajan, Pozzoli, Sonbawne, Ghude, Kiefer, and Eckert</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fadnavis, S., Schultz, M. G., Semeniuk, K., Mahajan, A. S., Pozzoli, L., Sonbawne, S., Ghude, S. D., Kiefer, M., and Eckert, E.:
Trends in peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere over southern Asia during the summer monsoon season: regional impacts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12725–12743, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12725-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12725-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Fahey et al.(2014)Fahey, Gao, Möhler, Saathoff, Schiller, Ebert, Krämer, Peter, Amarouche, Avallone, Bauer, Bozóki, Christensen, Davis, Durry, Dyroff, Herman, Hunsmann, Khaykin, Mackrodt, Meyer, Smith, Spelten, Troy, Vömel, Wagner, and Wienhold</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fahey, D. W., Gao, R.-S., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schiller, C., Ebert, V., Krämer, M., Peter, T., Amarouche, N., Avallone, L. M., Bauer, R., Bozóki, Z., Christensen, L. E., Davis, S. M., Durry, G., Dyroff, C., Herman, R. L., Hunsmann, S., Khaykin, S. M., Mackrodt, P., Meyer, J., Smith, J. B., Spelten, N., Troy, R. F., Vömel, H., Wagner, S., and Wienhold, F. G.:
The AquaVIT-1 intercomparison of atmospheric water vapor measurement techniques, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3177–3213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3177-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3177-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fromm et al.(2013)Fromm, Nedoluha, and Charvát</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fromm, M., Nedoluha, G., and Charvát, Z.:
Comment on “Large Volcanic Aerosol Load in the Stratosphere Linked to Asian Monsoon Transport”, Science, 339, 647, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228605" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228605</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Gao et al.(2016)Gao, Telg, McLaughlin, Ciciora, Watts, Richardson, Schwarz, Perring, Thornberry, Rollins, Markovic, Bates, Johnson, and Fahey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gao, R. S., Telg, H., McLaughlin, R. J., Ciciora, S. J., Watts, L. A., Richardson, M. S., Schwarz, J. P., Perring, A. E., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Markovic, M. Z., Bates, T. S., Johnson, J. E., and Fahey, D. W.:
A light-weight, high-sensitivity particle spectrometer for PM<sub>2.5</sub> aerosol measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 88–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1131809" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1131809</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Gorkavyi et al.(2021)Gorkavyi, Krotkov, Li, Lait, Colarco, Carn, DeLand, Newman, Schoeberl, Taha, Torres, Vasilkov, and Joiner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gorkavyi, N., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Lait, L., Colarco, P., Carn, S., DeLand, M., Newman, P., Schoeberl, M., Taha, G., Torres, O., Vasilkov, A., and Joiner, J.:
Tracking aerosols and SO<sub>2</sub> clouds from the Raikoke eruption: 3D view from satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7545–7563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>GRUAN Lead Centre(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
GRUAN Lead Centre:
InterMet iMet-1 (iMet-1-RSB) – GRUAN instrument information (radiosonde models), <a href="https://www.gruan.org/instruments/radiosondes/sonde-models/intermet-imet-1" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 January 2026), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Hanumanthu et al.(2020)Hanumanthu, Vogel, Müller, Brunamonti, Fadnavis, Li, Ölsner, Naja, Singh, Kumar, Sonbawne, Jauhiainen, Vömel, Luo, Jorge, Wienhold, Dirkson, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hanumanthu, S., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Brunamonti, S., Fadnavis, S., Li, D., Ölsner, P., Naja, M., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Jauhiainen, H., Vömel, H., Luo, B., Jorge, T., Wienhold, F. G., Dirkson, R., and Peter, T.:
Strong day-to-day variability of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer (ATAL) in August 2016 at the Himalayan foothills, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14273–14302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14273-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14273-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>He et al.(2024)He, Jing, Yin, Ohneiser, and Yi</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Y., Jing, D., Yin, Z., Ohneiser, K., and Yi, F.:
Long-term (2010–2021) lidar observations of stratospheric aerosols in Wuhan, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11431–11450, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11431-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11431-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Hersbach et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R.J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: Complete ERA5 from 1940: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Data Store (CDS) [data set],  <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.143582cf" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.143582cf</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara, Horànyi, Muñoz Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Abdalla, Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita, De Chiara, Dahlgren, Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hogan, Hólm, Janiskovà, Keeley, Laloyaux, Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti, de Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horànyi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janiskovà, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.:
The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hofmann and Solomon(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hofmann, D. J. and Solomon, S.:
Ozone destruction through heterogeneous chemistry following the eruption of El Chichón, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 5029–5041, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Jing et al.(2023)Jing, He, Yin, Liu, Yi, and Yi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Liu, F., Yi, Y., and Yi, F.:
Evolution of aerosol plumes from 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption observed with polarization lidar over central China, Atmos. Environ., 309, 119880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119880</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Khaykin et al.(2022)Khaykin, De Laat, Godin-Beekmann, Hauchecorne, and Ratynski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khaykin, S. M., De Laat, A. J., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hauchecorne, A., and Ratynski, M.:
Unexpected self-lofting and dynamical confinement of volcanic plumes: the Raikoke 2019 case, Scientific Reports, 12, 22409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27021-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27021-0</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Kloss et al.(2021)Kloss, Berthet, Sellitto, Ploeger, Taha, Tidiga, Eremenko, Bossolasco, Jégou, Renard, and Legras</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kloss, C., Berthet, G., Sellitto, P., Ploeger, F., Taha, G., Tidiga, M., Eremenko, M., Bossolasco, A., Jégou, F., Renard, J.-B., and Legras, B.:
Stratospheric aerosol layer perturbation caused by the 2019 Raikoke and Ulawun eruptions and their radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 535–560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Konopka et al.(2004)Konopka, Steinhorst, Grooß, Günther, Müller, Elkins, Jost, Richard, Schmidt, Toon, and McKenna</label><mixed-citation>
      
Konopka, P., Steinhorst, H.-M., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R., Elkins, J. W., Jost, H.-J., Richard, E., Schmidt, U., Toon, G., and McKenna, D. S.:
Mixing and Ozone Loss in the 1999-2000 Arctic Vortex: Simulations with the 3-dimensional Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), J. Geophys. Res., 109, D02315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003792" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003792</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Konopka et al.(2007)Konopka, Günther, Müller, dos Santos, Schiller, Ravegnani, Ulanovsky, Schlager, Volk, Viciani, Pan, McKenna, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Konopka, P., Günther, G., Müller, R., dos Santos, F. H. S., Schiller, C., Ravegnani, F., Ulanovsky, A., Schlager, H., Volk, C. M., Viciani, S., Pan, L. L., McKenna, D.-S., and Riese, M.:
Contribution of mixing to upward transport across the tropical tropopause layer (TTL), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3285–3308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3285-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3285-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Konopka et al.(2009)Konopka, Grooß, Plöger, and Müller</label><mixed-citation>
      
Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Plöger, F., and Müller, R.:
Annual cycle of horizontal in-mixing into the lower tropical stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D19111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011955" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011955</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Li et al.(2017)Li, Vogel, Bian, Müller, Pan, Günther, Bai, Li, Zhang, Fan, and Vömel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, D., Vogel, B., Bian, J., Müller, R., Pan, L. L., Günther, G., Bai, Z., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Fan, Q., and Vömel, H.:
Impact of typhoons on the composition of the upper troposphere within the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone: the SWOP campaign in Lhasa 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4657–4672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4657-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4657-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Li et al.(2018)Li, Vogel, Müller, Bian, Günther, Li, Zhang, Bai, Vömel, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, D., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Bian, J., Günther, G., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Bai, Z., Vömel, H., and Riese, M.:
High tropospheric ozone in Lhasa within the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone in 2013: influence of convective transport and stratospheric intrusions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17979–17994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17979-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17979-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Li et al.(2020)Li, Vogel, Müller, Bian, Günther, Ploeger, Li, Zhang, Bai, Vömel, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, D., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Bian, J., Günther, G., Ploeger, F., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Bai, Z., Vömel, H., and Riese, M.:
Dehydration and low ozone in the tropopause layer over the Asian monsoon caused by tropical cyclones: Lagrangian transport calculations using ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalysis data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4133–4152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Ma et al.(2022)Ma, Bian, Li, Bai, Li, Zhang, Wang, Zheng, Hurst, and Vömel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, D., Bian, J., Li, D., Bai, Z., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Wang, H., Zheng, X., Hurst, D. F., and Vömel, H.:
Mixing characteristics within the tropopause transition layer over the Asian summer monsoon region based on ozone and water vapor sounding data, Atmos. Res., 271, 106093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106093</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Masson-Delmotte et al.(2021)Masson-Delmotte, Zhai, Pirani, Connors, Péan, Berger, Caud, Chen, Goldfarb, Gomis, Huang, Leitzell, Lonnoy, Matthews, Maycock, Waterfield, Yelekçi, Yu, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>
      
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B. (Eds.): Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>McCormick et al.(1995)McCormick, Thomason, and Trepte</label><mixed-citation>
      
McCormick, M. P., Thomason, L. W., and Trepte, C. R.:
Atmospheric effects of the Mt Pinatubo eruption, Nature, 373, 399–404, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>McKenna et al.(2002)McKenna, Konopka, Grooß, Günther, Müller, Spang, Offermann, and Orsolini</label><mixed-citation>
      
McKenna, D. S., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Müller, R., Spang, R., Offermann, D., and Orsolini, Y.:
A new Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS): 1. Formulation of advection and mixing, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000114</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Minnis et al.(1993)Minnis, Harrison, Stowe, Gibson, Denn, Doelling, and Smith Jr</label><mixed-citation>
      
Minnis, P., Harrison, E., Stowe, L., Gibson, G., Denn, F., Doelling, D., and Smith Jr, W.:
Radiative climate forcing by the Mount Pinatubo eruption, Science, 259, 1411–1415, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Murphy and Koop(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murphy, D. M. and Koop, T.:
Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.Soc., 131, 1539–1565, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Muser et al.(2020)Muser, Hoshyaripour, Bruckert, Horváth, Malinina, Wallis, Prata, Rozanov, von Savigny, Vogel et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Muser, L. O., Hoshyaripour, G. A., Bruckert, J., Horváth, Á., Malinina, E., Wallis, S., Prata, F. J., Rozanov, A., von Savigny, C., Vogel, H., and Vogel, B.:
Particle aging and aerosol–radiation interaction affect volcanic plume dispersion: evidence from the Raikoke 2019 eruption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15015–15036, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15015-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15015-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Park et al.(2007)Park, Randel, Gettleman, Massie, and Jiang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Park, M., Randel, W. J., Gettleman, A., Massie, S. T., and Jiang, J. H.:
Transport above the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone inferred from Aura Microwave Limb Sounder tracers, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008294</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Ploeger et al.(2015)Ploeger, Gottschling, Grießbach, Grooß, Günther, Konopka, Müller, Riese, Stroh, Tao, Ungermann, Vogel, and von Hobe</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ploeger, F., Gottschling, C., Griessbach, S., Grooß, J.-U., Guenther, G., Konopka, P., Müller, R., Riese, M., Stroh, F., Tao, M., Ungermann, J., Vogel, B., and von Hobe, M.:
A potential vorticity-based determination of the transport barrier in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13145–13159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Ploeger et al.(2021)Ploeger, Diallo, Charlesworth, Konopka, Legras, Laube, Grooß, Günther, Engel, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ploeger, F., Diallo, M., Charlesworth, E., Konopka, P., Legras, B., Laube, J. C., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Engel, A., and Riese, M.:
The stratospheric Brewer–Dobson circulation inferred from age of air in the ERA5 reanalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8393–8412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8393-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8393-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Poltera et al.(2025)Poltera, Luo, Wienhold, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Poltera, Y., Luo, B., Wienhold, F. G., and Peter, T.:
The “Golden Points” and nonequilibrium correction of high-accuracy frost point hygrometers, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2003</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Pommrich et al.(2014)Pommrich, Müller, Grooß, Konopka, Ploeger, Vogel, Tao, Hoppe, Günther, Spelten, Hoffmann, Pumphrey, Viciani, D'Amato, Volk, Hoor, Schlager, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pommrich, R., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Konopka, P., Ploeger, F., Vogel, B., Tao, M., Hoppe, C. M., Günther, G., Spelten, N., Hoffmann, L., Pumphrey, H.-C., Viciani, S., D'Amato, F., Volk, C. M., Hoor, P., Schlager, H., and Riese, M.:
Tropical troposphere to stratosphere transport of carbon monoxide and long-lived trace species in the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2895–2916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2895-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Portmann et al.(1996)Portmann, Solomon, Garcia, Thomason, Poole, and McCormick</label><mixed-citation>
      
Portmann, R. W., Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R., Thomason, L. W., Poole, L. R., and McCormick, M. P.:
Role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone depletion in the polar regions, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 22991–23006, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Randel et al.(2010)Randel, Park, Emmons, Kinnison, Bernath, Walker, Boone, and Pumphrey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Randel, W. J., Park, M., Emmons, L., Kinnison, D., Bernath, P., Walker, K. A., Boone, C., and Pumphrey, H.:
Asian Monsoon Transport of Pollution to the Stratosphere, Science, 328, 611–613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182274" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182274</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Reinares Martínez et al.(2021)Reinares Martínez, Evan, Wienhold, Brioude, Jensen, Thornberry, Héron, Verreyken, Körner, Vömel et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Reinares Martínez, I., Evan, S., Wienhold, F. G., Brioude, J., Jensen, E. J., Thornberry, T. D., Héron, D., Verreyken, B., Körner, S., Vömel, H., Metzger, J.-M., and Posny, F.:
Unprecedented observations of a nascent in situ cirrus in the tropical tropopause layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL090936, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090936" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090936</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Santee et al.(2017)Santee, Manney, Livesey, Schwartz, Neu, and Read</label><mixed-citation>
      
Santee, M. L., Manney, G. L., Livesey, N. J., Schwartz, M. J., Neu, J. L., and Read, W. G.:
A comprehensive overview of the climatological composition of the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone based on 10 years of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 5491–5514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026408</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Schmidt and Black(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmidt, A. and Black, B. A.:
Reckoning with the rocky relationship between eruption size and climate response: toward a volcano-climate index, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 50, 627–661, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Schmidt et al.(2018)Schmidt, Mills, Ghan, Gregory, Allan, Andrews, Bardeen, Conley, Forster, Gettelman et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmidt, A., Mills, M. J., Ghan, S., Gregory, J. M., Allan, R. P., Andrews, T., Bardeen, C. G., Conley, A., Forster, P. M., Gettelman, A., Portmann, R. W., Solomon, S., and Toon, O. B.:
Volcanic radiative forcing from 1979 to 2015, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 12491–12508, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Solomon(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Solomon, S.:
Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history, Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Solomon et al.(2011)Solomon, Daniel, Neely, Vernier, Dutton, and Thomason</label><mixed-citation>
      
Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely, R. R., Vernier, J.-P., Dutton, E. G., and Thomason, L. W.:
The Persistently Variable “Background” Stratospheric Aerosol Layer and Global Climate Change, Science, 333, 866–870, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Solomon et al.(2016)Solomon, Ivy, Kinnison, Mills, Neely, and Schmidt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Solomon, S., Ivy, D. J., Kinnison, D., Mills, M. J., Neely, R. R., and Schmidt, A.:
Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer, Science, 353, 269–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aae0061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aae0061</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Tabazadeh et al.(2002)Tabazadeh, Drdla, Schoeberl, Hamill, and Toon</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tabazadeh, A., Drdla, K., Schoeberl, M. R., Hamill, P., and Toon, O. B.:
Arctic “ozone hole” in a cold volcanic stratosphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 2609–2612, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Theys et al.(2017)Theys, De Smedt, Yu, Danckaert, van Gent, Hörmann, Wagner, Hedelt, Bauer, Romahn et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Theys, N., De Smedt, I., Yu, H., Danckaert, T., van Gent, J., Hörmann, C., Wagner, T., Hedelt, P., Bauer, H., Romahn, F., Pedergnana, M., Loyola, D., and Van Roozendael, M.:
Sulfur dioxide retrievals from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor: algorithm theoretical basis, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 119–153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-119-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-119-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Theys et al.(2024)Theys, Smedt, Lerot, Vlietinck, Yu, Roozendael, Hedelt, and Romahn</label><mixed-citation>
      
Theys, N., Smedt, I. D., Lerot, C., Vlietinck, J., Yu, H., Roozendael, M. V., Hedelt, P., and Romahn, F.:
Sentinel-5P/TROPOMI SO<sub>2</sub> Level-2 Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, 87 pp., <a href="https://sentinels.copernicus.eu/documents/247904/2476257/Sentinel-5P-ATBD-SO2-TROPOMI.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 March 2026), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Thompson and Solomon(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thompson, D. W. J. and Solomon, S.:
Understanding Recent Stratospheric Climate Change, J. Climate, 22, 1934–1943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2482.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2482.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Todt et al.(2023)Todt, Asher, Hall, Cullis, Jordan, Xiong, Hurst, and Thornberry</label><mixed-citation>
      
Todt, M. A., Asher, E., Hall, E., Cullis, P., Jordan, A., Xiong, K., Hurst, D. F., and Thornberry, T.:
Baseline Balloon Stratospheric Aerosol Profiles (B2SAP)–Systematic Measurements of Aerosol Number Density and Size, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD038041, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038041</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Toohey et al.(2025)Toohey, Jia, Khanal, and Tegtmeier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Toohey, M., Jia, Y., Khanal, S., and Tegtmeier, S.:
Stratospheric residence time and the lifetime of volcanic stratospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3821–3839, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3821-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3821-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Veefkind et al.(2012)Veefkind, Aben, McMullan, Förster, De Vries, Otter, Claas, Eskes, De Haan, Kleipool et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veefkind, J. P., Aben, I., McMullan, K., Förster, H., de Vries, J., Otter, G., Claas, J., Eskes, H. J., de Haan, J. F., Kleipool, Q., van Weele, M., Hasekamp, O., Hoogeveen, R., Landgraf, J., Snel, R., Tol, P., Ingmann, P., Voors, R., Kruizinga, B., Vink, R., Visser, H., and Levelt, P. F.:
TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 70–83, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Vernier et al.(2013)Vernier, Thomason, Fairlie, Minnis, Bedka, and Palikonda</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vernier, J., Thomason, L. W., Fairlie, T. D., Minnis, P., Bedka, K. M., and Palikonda, R.:
Comment on “Large Volcanic Aerosol Load in the Stratosphere Linked to Asian Monsoon Transport”, Science, 339, 647, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227817</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Vernier et al.(2015)Vernier, Fairlie, Natarajan, Wienhold, Bian, Martinsson, Crumeyrolle, Thomason, and Bedka</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J., Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.:
Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and its potential connection with Asian pollution, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 1608–1619, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Vernier et al.(2018)Vernier, Fairlie, Deshler, Ratnam, Gadhavi, Kumar, Natarajan, Pandit, Raj, Kumar, Jayaraman, Singh, Rastogi, Sinha, Kumar, Tiwari, Wegner, Baker, Vignelles, Stenchikov, Shevchenko, Smith, Bedka, Kesarkar, Singh, Bhate, Ravikiran, Rao, Ravindrababu, Patel, Vernier, Wienhold, Liu, Knepp, Thomason, Crawford, Ziemba, Moore, Crumeyrolle, Williamson, Berthet, Jégou, and Renard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vernier, J.-P., Fairlie, T. D., Deshler, T., Ratnam, M. V., Gadhavi, H., Kumar, B. S., Natarajan, M., Pandit, A. K., Raj, S. T. A., Kumar, A. H., Jayaraman, A., Singh, A. K., Rastogi, N., Sinha, P. R., Kumar, S., Tiwari, S., Wegner, T., Baker, N., Vignelles, D., Stenchikov, G., Shevchenko, I., Smith, J., Bedka, K., Kesarkar, A., Singh, V., Bhate, J., Ravikiran, V., Rao, M. D., Ravindrababu, S., Patel, A., Vernier, H., Wienhold, F. G., Liu, H., Knepp, T. N., Thomason, L., Crawford, J., Ziemba, L., Moore, J., Crumeyrolle, S., Williamson, M., Berthet, G., Jégou, F., and Renard, J.-B.:
BATAL: The Balloon Measurement Campaigns of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 955–973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0014.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0014.1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Vernier et al.(2024)Vernier, Aubry, Timmreck, Schmidt, Clarisse, Prata, Theys, Prata, Mann, Choi et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vernier, J.-P., Aubry, T. J., Timmreck, C., Schmidt, A., Clarisse, L., Prata, F., Theys, N., Prata, A. T., Mann, G., Choi, H., Carn, S., Rigby, R., Loughlin, S. C., and Stevenson, J. A.:
The 2019 Raikoke eruption as a testbed used by the Volcano Response group for rapid assessment of volcanic atmospheric impacts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5765–5782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5765-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5765-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Vogel et al.(2016)Vogel, Günther, Müller, Grooß, Afchine, Bozem, Hoor, Krämer, Müller, Riese, Rolf, Spelten, Stiller, Ungermann, and Zahn</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogel, B., Günther, G., Müller, R., Grooß, J.-U., Afchine, A., Bozem, H., Hoor, P., Krämer, M., Müller, S., Riese, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Stiller, G. P., Ungermann, J., and Zahn, A.:
Long-range transport pathways of tropospheric source gases originating in Asia into the northern lower stratosphere during the Asian monsoon season 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15301–15325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15301-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15301-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Vogel et al.(2019)Vogel, Müller, Günther, Spang, Hanumanthu, Li, Riese, and Stiller</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogel, B., Müller, R., Günther, G., Spang, R., Hanumanthu, S., Li, D., Riese, M., and Stiller, G. P.:
Lagrangian simulations of the transport of young air masses to the top of the Asian monsoon anticyclone and into the tropical pipe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6007–6034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6007-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Vogel et al.(2024)Vogel, Volk, Wintel, Lauther, Clemens, Grooß, Günther, Hoffmann, Laube, Müller et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogel, B., Volk, C. M., Wintel, J., Lauther, V., Clemens, J., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Hoffmann, L., Laube, J. C., Müller, R., Ploeger, F., and Stroh, F.:
Evaluation of vertical transport in ERA5 and ERA-Interim reanalysis using high-altitude aircraft measurements in the Asian summer monsoon 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 317–343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-317-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-317-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Vogel et al.(2025)Vogel, Lauther, Köllner, Ekinci, Rolf, Strobel, van Luijt, Volk, Borrmann, Dragoneas, Eppers, Molleker, Hoor, Ort, Weyland, Zahn, Clemens, Günther, Kachula, Müller, Ploeger, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogel, B., Lauther, V., Köllner, F., Ekinci, F., Rolf, C., Strobel, J., van Luijt, R., Volk, M. C., Borrmann, S., Dragoneas, A., Eppers, O., Molleker, S., Hoor, P., Ort, L., Weyland, F., Zahn, A., Clemens, J., Günther, G., Kachula, O., Müller, R., Ploeger, F., and Riese, M.:
Continental and marine source regions contributing to the outflow of the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone during the PHILEAS campaign in summer 2023, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5609" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5609</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Vömel et al.(2016)Vömel, Naebert, Dirksen, and Sommer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vömel, H., Naebert, T., Dirksen, R., and Sommer, M.:
An update on the uncertainties of water vapor measurements using cryogenic frost point hygrometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3755–3768, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3755-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3755-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Wu et al.(2023)Wu, Qiao, Chen, Wang, Hoffmann, Griessbach, Tian, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, X., Qiao, Q., Chen, B., Wang, X., Hoffmann, L., Griessbach, S., Tian, Y., and Wang, Y.:
The influence of the Asian summer monsoon on volcanic aerosol transport in the UTLS region, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 6, 11, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Yang et al.(2023)Yang, Li, Luo, Tian, Bai, Li, Zhang, Wang, Zheng, Vömel et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Z., Li, D., Luo, J., Tian, W., Bai, Z., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Wang, H., Zheng, X., Vömel, H., Wienhold, F. G., Peter, T., Hurst, D., and Bian, J.:
Determination of cirrus occurrence and distribution characteristics over the Tibetan Plateau based on the SWOP campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037682, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037682" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037682</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Yu et al.(2017)Yu, Rosenlof, Liu, Telg, Thornberry, Rollins, Portmann, Bai, Ray, Duan, Pan, Toon, Bian, and Gao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Liu, S., Telg, H., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Portmann, R. W., Bai, Z., Ray, E. A., Duan, Y., Pan, L. L., Toon, O. B., Bian, J., and Gao, R.-S.:
Efficient transport of tropospheric aerosol into the stratosphere via the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 6972–6977, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701170114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701170114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Yu et al.(2023)Yu, Portmann, Peng, Liu, Zhu, Asher, Bai, Lu, Bian, Mills et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, P., Portmann, R. W., Peng, Y., Liu, C.-C., Zhu, Y., Asher, E., Bai, Z., Lu, Y., Bian, J., Mills, M. J., Schmidt, A., Rosenlof, K. H., and Toon, O. B.:
Radiative forcing from the 2014–2022 volcanic and wildfire injections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103791, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Zhu et al.(2022)Zhu, Bardeen, Tilmes, Mills, Wang, Harvey, Taha, Kinnison, Portmann, Yu et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhu, Y., Bardeen, C. G., Tilmes, S., Mills, M. J., Wang, X., Harvey, V. L., Taha, G., Kinnison, D., Portmann, R. W., Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Avery, M., Kloss, C., Li, C., Glanville, A. S., Millán, L., Deshler, T., Krotkov, N., and Toon, O. B.:
Perturbations in stratospheric aerosol evolution due to the water-rich plume of the 2022 Hunga-Tonga eruption, Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 3, 248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00580-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00580-w</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Zuev et al.(2015)Zuev, Zueva, Savelieva, and Gerasimov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zuev, V., Zueva, N., Savelieva, E., and Gerasimov, V.:
The Antarctic ozone depletion caused by Erebus volcano gas emissions, Atmos. Environ., 122, 393–399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.005</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
