<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-15831-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>The synergy of morphology and mixing state on the absorption of coated black carbon soot</article-title><alt-title>The synergy of morphology and mixing state on coated soot</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff7">
          <name><surname>Heuser</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          <email>hannes.heu@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Di Biagio</surname><given-names>Claudia</given-names></name>
          <email>claudia.dibiagio@lisa.ipsl.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8273-6211</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Yon</surname><given-names>Jérôme</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cazaunau</surname><given-names>Mathieu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff8">
          <name><surname>Bergé</surname><given-names>Antonin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pangui</surname><given-names>Edouard</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zanatta</surname><given-names>Marco</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7711-6808</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Renzi</surname><given-names>Laura</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6066-0942</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Marinoni</surname><given-names>Angela</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6580-7126</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Chenjie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-4558</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chevaillier</surname><given-names>Servanne</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Ferry</surname><given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1469-9871</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff9">
          <name><surname>Laj</surname><given-names>Paolo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6586-0664</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Maillé</surname><given-names>Michel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Formenti</surname><given-names>Paola</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-1351</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Picquet-Varrault</surname><given-names>Benedicte</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5158-8703</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Doussin</surname><given-names>Jean-Francois</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8042-7228</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Univ Paris Est Creteil and Université Paris Cité, CNRS, LISA, 94010 Créteil, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Université Paris Cité and Univ Paris Est Creteil, CNRS, LISA, 75013 Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>INSA Rouen Normandie, Univ. Rouen Normandie, CNRS, Normandie Univ., CORIA UMR 6614, 76000, Rouen, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research Council of Italy, Bologna, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Aix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CINaM, Marseille, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Univ. Grenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, INRAE, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Deutscher Wetterdienst, Frahmredder 95, 22393 Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>b</label><institution>now at: Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA–CNRS–UVSQ, IPSL, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>c</label><institution>now at: World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Johannes Heuser (hannes.heu@gmail.com) and Claudia Di Biagio (claudia.dibiagio@lisa.ipsl.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>21</issue>
      <fpage>15831</fpage><lpage>15852</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Johannes Heuser et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15831/2026/acp-26-15831-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15831/2026/acp-26-15831-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15831/2026/acp-26-15831-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15831/2026/acp-26-15831-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e289">Black carbon (BC) strongly absorbs light and contributes to climate warming. Coating formation on fractal BC-containing soot is a ubiquitous atmospheric process that enhances its absorption, but the extent of this absorption enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) remains uncertain and difficult to represent in models. In this study, we use large simulation chamber experiments to investigate BC absorption and its modification by coating formation and ageing. Polydisperse fractal BC-containing soot was mixed with non-absorbing atmospherically-relevant secondary aerosols (sulfuric acid and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic aerosols). Varying reaction dynamics produced different coating rates and masses, mimicking atmospheric processing. The evolution of soot and coating properties was tracked for up to 20 h. The results of this study suggest a general positive correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and coating amount on soot. However, they also experimentally demonstrate the strong effect of morphological modifications and mixing state heterogeneity on BC absorption, both depending on the reaction dynamics of coating formation and ageing of the coated soot. Combined variations in morphology and mixing state affect the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its further evolution, leading, depending on processing, to either an increase or decrease in absorption. The range of measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting from soot processing cannot be reliably represented using a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value or by a core-shell optical model, two approximations commonly used in climate models. These results support the need for new formalisms that would take into account both morphological and mixing state heterogeneity to improve model predictions of BC absorption and its role on the radiative budget.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Agence Nationale de la Recherche</funding-source>
<award-id>ANR-19-CE01-0024-01</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique</funding-source>
<award-id>BACON project</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Horizon 2020</funding-source>
<award-id>730997</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>NextGenerationEU</funding-source>
<award-id>IR0000032</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e364">Black carbon (BC) is the major aerosol light-absorber and one of the strongest contributors to modern climate forcing (Bond et al., 2013; IPCC, 2023; Lee et al., 2021). Soot, as the most common BC-containing aerosol, is emitted as a product of incomplete combustion of biomass, biofuels, and fossil fuels, and displays a broad atmospheric distribution ranging from the surface into the stratosphere and from urban environments to remote locations (Bond et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2020; Schwarz et al., 2006). Light absorption by BC in soot is strongly affected by internal mixing with brown carbon (Cheng et al., 2019; Heuser et al., 2025a) and secondary species (Colbeck et al., 1990; Schnaiter et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018), either co-emitted or formed during atmospheric lifetime. In particular, the formation of a non- or weakly-absorbing coating on soot has been established to enhance its absorption due to refracting and reflecting effects (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Cappa et al., 2012, 2019; Fuller et al., 1999). This enhancement is commonly expressed via the enhancement factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the ratio between the absorption of the coated and the uncoated soot.</p>
      <p id="d2e378">Currently, the magnitude and dependencies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coating and soot properties remain controversial (Cappa et al., 2012; Fierce et al., 2016, 2020; Liu et al., 2017; Peng et al., 2016). Most studies generally describe an increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an increasing coating-to-soot or coating-to-BC mass ratio. Laboratory works retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as high as 2 for internally mixed soot with varying coating-to-BC mass ratios (Cappa et al., 2012; Lack et al., 2009; Peng et al., 2016; Schnaiter et al., 2005). Field observations led to diverse results, with some studies reporting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to 3 (Liu et al., 2015, 2017; Zhang et al., 2018), while others calculate small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> despite large coating masses (Cappa et al., 2012, 2019; Chan et al., 2010; Healy et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2024). The spread of observations suggests that the mechanisms leading to absorption enhancement do not depend solely on the amount of coating mass deposited on the BC. Key aspects evidenced to affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> magnitude and variability include (i) the single particle properties and mixing state including the morphological organization of the soot and its coating (Chen et al., 2024; Huang et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2017; Sedlacek III et al., 2012), i.e. the way secondary species distributes over the fractal soot including void filling or encapsulating soot with consequent collapse of the aggregate; (ii) the diversity in the particle-to-particle mixing state in the soot population (Cappa et al., 2019; Fierce et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2023; Zeng et al., 2024), and the (iii) rate of coating formation and ageing (Cappa et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2016). Despite advances in identifying the various mechanisms contributing to the variability of soot absorption, including evaluation of instrumental and methodological uncertainties (Asmi et al., 2025), the process-level understanding of the impact of ageing on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains elusive.  As a consequence of this lack of knowledge, and despite the evident variability, most climate models keep an oversimplified estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> either via a concentric core-shell optical model (the Mie core-shell for spherical coated particles) or a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> factor, often set at the value of 1.5 (Sand et al., 2021). However, both approximations are identified to overestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cappa et al., 2019; Fierce et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e494">In order to advance towards a mechanistic understanding of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in this work, we investigate the absorption of BC and its modification due to coating formation based on systematic laboratory experiments in a large simulation chamber. We generated polydisperse fractal BC-containing soot and mixed it with non-absorbing atmospherically-relevant secondary aerosol species (sulfuric acid, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene secondary organic aerosols, SOA). Multiple coating experiments were performed with varying reaction dynamics, leading to slower/faster and lower/higher coating mass formation, mimicking the processing occurring in the atmosphere. The evolution of the soot and coating properties over up to 20 h of chamber lifetime was studied to evaluate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> magnitude and variability, and its link to physico-chemical properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d2e552">This study utilises the 4.2 m<sup>3</sup> stainless steel CESAM atmospheric simulation chamber (French acronym for Experimental Multiphasic Atmospheric Simulation Chamber) (Doussin et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2011) (<uri>https://cesam.cnrs.fr/</uri>, last access: 17 July 2026). CESAM is a temperature-, pressure-, and humidity-controlled chamber designed to allow multiphase atmospheric (photo-) chemistry, widely used to investigate the formation, evolution and climate-relevant properties of primary and secondary sub- and super-micron aerosols (Baldo et al., 2020, 2023; Battaglia et al., 2025; Caponi et al., 2017; De Haan et al., 2023; Di Biagio et al., 2017, 2019, 2023; Heuser et al., 2025a). The gaseous and aerosol content can be varied in CESAM to reproduce atmospherically-relevant mixtures under varying particles and gas-phase concentrations. Realistic solar irradiation is provided by three 6.5 kW Xenon arc lamps. A stainless steel fan placed at the bottom of the reactor ensures the homogeneity within the volume, with a mixing time of around one minute. The aerosol lifetime in the chamber is between 6 to more than 24 h for particles of diameter between 50 and 200 nm (Lamkaddam et al., 2017). CESAM is equipped with 12 circular flanges enabling the deployment of multiple instruments for online and offline measurements of the chamber's thermodynamic state, gas-phase composition, aerosol concentration and their physico-chemical and spectral optical properties.</p>
      <p id="d2e567">A total of 16 experiments were performed to investigate the evolution of the soot optical properties due to different ageing conditions, as summarized in Table 1. Six of these experiments targeted the formation of a coating on soot under diverse reactions dynamics and its subsequent ageing. In three experiments, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> coating was generated via the reaction of SO<sub>2</sub> and hydroxyl radical (OH). In two of these experiments (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high1, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high2), O<sub>3</sub> (at concentration of about 950 ppb) was used for OH-radical production via photolysis in the presence of water vapour. An additional experiment (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-low) was performed without active OH-production from O<sub>3</sub>. In the other three coating experiments, SOA was generated via the ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene. The quantities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and soot were changed at similar O<sub>3</sub> concentration (306 to 384 ppb) to alter the amount of SOA and soot coating generated. In the SOA-S<sub>ref</sub> experiment, the initial soot mass (63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) was comparable to H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> experiments (within 80 and 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). In SOA-S<sub>low</sub> smaller quantities of soot (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) were injected while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene was kept comparable to SOA-S<sub>ref</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 ppb), and SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub> was performed at about two to three times the soot and precursor concentration as SOA-S<sub>ref</sub> (soot <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 169 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 ppb). Ten control experiments were performed to evaluate the impact on the soot properties of each compound, process, and protocol used in the coating experiments. These aimed to quantify the effects of soot lifetime and coagulation under dry and humid conditions, of irradiation under dry and humid conditions, and of the presence of O<sub>3</sub> and OH-radicals under humid conditions on particles' physico-chemical and spectral optical properties, with particular emphasis on particle density, size, and light absorption. Further control experiments were performed with non-absorbing submicron ammonium sulphate and sulphuric acid aerosols with well-characterized properties to validate the performance and consistency of the optical and physico-chemical measurements, as presented and discussed by Heuser et al. (2025a).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Protocol of chamber experiments</title>
      <p id="d2e915">For the experiments, the chamber was filled with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-mixture of N<sub>2</sub> (evaporated from liquid N<sub>2</sub>; Messer, purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99.995 %) and O<sub>2</sub> (Linde 5.0, purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99 999 %) at a slight overpressure (ambient conditions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa) to avoid external contaminations.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e985">List of soot ageing experiments. These are separated into the coating experiments, in which coating generation was achieved and studied, and the control experiments. Table columns indicate: the experiment name, the measurement interval after coating formation (coating experiments) or for different ageing conditions (control experiments), the total soot lifetime in the chamber, the initial soot mass concentration, the relative humidity (RH), the ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) concentration at the start of the SOA generation, and the SO<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene injected concentrations. The list of digital object identifiers (DOI) for the experimental data are also reported. Those data are available through the Database of Atmospheric Simulation Chamber Studies (DASCS) of the EUROCHAMP Data Centre (<uri>https://data.eurochamp.org/data-access/chamber-experiments/</uri>, last access: 30 October 2026) also available via the ACTRIS data portal (<uri>https://data.actris.eu/</uri>, last access: 30 October 2026).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Measurement</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Initial mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">O<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SO<sub>2</sub>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Dataset DOI and reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">interval for</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">lifetime</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">concentration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[ppb]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">pinene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">aged aerosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(hh:mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[ppb]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(hh:mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8">Coating experiments </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">03:03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06:50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">273 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/76FN-TA55" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/76FN-TA55</ext-link> (Heuser et al., 2025b)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20:31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24:48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/PWHP-ED62" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/PWHP-ED62</ext-link> (Heuser et al., 2025c)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20:27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25:16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">955 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">258 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/A18P-JF85" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/A18P-JF85</ext-link> (Heuser et al., 2025d)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA-S<sub>ref</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20:01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24:43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">384 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/AK6B-ZA08" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/AK6B-ZA08</ext-link>  (Heuser et al., 2025e)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21:58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27:03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">169 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">306 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/N7S0-S115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/N7S0-S115</ext-link> (Heuser et al., 2025f)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA-S<sub>low</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">02:03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">07:22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/BGRM-3554" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/BGRM-3554</ext-link>  (Heuser et al., 2025g)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8">Control experiments </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot coagulation dry 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21:51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21:51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/8KVR-AA70" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/8KVR-AA70</ext-link>  (Heuser et al., 2025h)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot coagulation dry 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25:36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25:36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">198 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/M24W-V933" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/M24W-V933</ext-link>  (Heuser et al., 2025i)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot irradiation dry 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">02:05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">05:01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/2QRB-4E45" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/2QRB-4E45</ext-link>  (Heuser et al., 2025j)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot irradiation dry 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">01:03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">02:37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/8HT1-WA13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/8HT1-WA13</ext-link>  (Heuser et al., 2025k)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot coagulation humid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">05:16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">07:11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/WN6E-0272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/WN6E-0272</ext-link> (Heuser et al., 2025l)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot irradiation humid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">04:44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06:46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/EAQE-VX80" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/EAQE-VX80</ext-link>  (Heuser et al., 2025m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot O<sub>3</sub> irradiation humid 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">03:24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">07:48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">928 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/JRAC-4W36" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/JRAC-4W36</ext-link>  (Heuser et al., 2025n)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot O<sub>3</sub> irradiation humid 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">02:31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06:03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">925 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/2BD3-Q151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/2BD3-Q151</ext-link>  (Heuser et al., 2025o)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot O<sub>3</sub> irradiation humid 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">03:11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">07:59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">992 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/9G66-MG61" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/9G66-MG61</ext-link> (Heuser et al., 2025p)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soot O<sub>3</sub> irradiation humid 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">02:04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">05:31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1003 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/XJKP-JD08" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/XJKP-JD08</ext-link> (Heuser et al., 2025q)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2076">The combustion aerosol was produced with a miniCAST propane-diffusion flame soot generator (Model 6204 Type C, Jing Ltd., Switzerland), which allows for repeatable soot generations (Heuser et al., 2025a; Moore et al., 2014). For all experiments, the propane, mixing N<sub>2</sub>, quench N<sub>2</sub>, oxidation, and dilution air flows were kept at 0.03, 0, 2, 0.75, and 5 L min<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, as corresponding to the first operation point of the miniCAST, producing a fuel-lean combustion with a global equivalence ratio of 0.91. Fuel-lean miniCAST soot is widely regarded as representative of diesel and aircraft (kerosene-type) emissions (Ess et al., 2021; Moore et al., 2014; Saffaripour et al., 2017). The bulk elemental-to-total carbon ratio (EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TC) of the generated cast soot (CS), hereafter referred to as CS1, was measured at 0.79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11, indicating a BC-dominated composition (Heuser et al., 2025a). The CS1 was injected into CESAM through an activated carbon denuder for a duration between 30 and 390 s, depending on the targeted mass concentration.</p>
      <p id="d2e2124">The water vapour was injected about 2 h after the soot to reach a relative humidity of ca. 30 %, as steam from a modified pressure cooker filled with ultra-pure water (18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 3.2 ppb TOC, Milipak) (Wang et al., 2011). Ozone was injected directly out of an ozone generator (BMT 802N, BMT MESSTECHNIK GMBH), using bottled O<sub>2</sub> (Linde 5.0, purity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99 999 %). About 40 ppb of Butanol-d<sub>9</sub> (1-Butanol D<sub>9</sub>, 98 %, Euroisotop) was volatilized and injected, prior to the O<sub>3</sub>, using a vacuum line and a glass bulb. The Butanol-d<sub>9</sub> was used as a tracer to monitor the OH-exposure. Following O<sub>3</sub>, about 75 to 90 min later, the precursors for the secondary aerosol and coating formation were introduced in the chamber volume. The SO<sub>2</sub> (Merck, 99.95 %) was injected using a calibrated gas-tight syringe and septum inlets. The H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> generation itself was then started by initiating the photochemical hydroxyl radical production by turning on the three Xenon-arc lamps. The light of the lamps is introduced via quartz windows equipped with Pyrex<sup>®</sup>  filters (6.5 mm), generating a spectrum close to solar radiation at ground level (Wang et al., 2011). Temperature fluctuations due to the radiation were limited with a cooling system (LAUDA Integral-T 10 000 W) to about 1 to 2 K, resulting in a temperature range of 294 to 301 K during experiments. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene (98 %, Sigma-Aldrich) was volatilized using a vacuum line, and a known quantity of the SOA precursor was injected with a glass bubble. Dark conditions and minimal temperature fluctuations between 289 and 291,K required no temperature regulations in the SOA experiments. After 3 h since the start of secondary aerosol formation, the majority of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene was consumed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 ppb remaining), and the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> coating production was stopped by turning off the lamps. In experiments H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high 1 and 2, SOA-S<sub>ref</sub>, and SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high,</sub> the coated soot was left in suspension under dark conditions with reduced instrumentation and minimal dilution (about 3 L min<sup>−1</sup>). After 15 h, the aged soot was again fully characterized.</p>
      <p id="d2e2327">At the end of each experiment, the CESAM chamber was evacuated to around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa to avoid carryover contaminations and stays evacuated between subsequent experiments. The chamber was also additionally cleaned manually at the beginning of each campaign and when changing the chemical system. More details on the experimental protocol for the soot and control experiments are provided in Sect. S1 and Table S1 in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e2356">A large complementary set of state-of-the-art instrumentation was used to characterize the physico-chemical and spectral optical properties of the soot aerosol, as well as the thermodynamic state of the volume and its gaseous content. The full instrumentation including details for measurement uncertainties calculations are detailed in Tables S2 and S3, and previously described in Heuser et al. (2025a). The majority of online measurements were performed continuously throughout experiments with the exception of short disconnections at soot and water vapour injections. During the 15 h dark ageing, only the number size distribution was measured continuously. Air sampled out of the chamber during experiments (varying between 3 and 22 L min<sup>−1</sup>) was compensated with a particle-free N<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>2</sub>-mixture, leading to a constant dilution of the compounds in the chamber. The main instruments used to characterise the aerosol properties in this work are presented in the following. The aerosol was measured without drying to preserve realistic RH conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2396">The aerosol number size concentration between 19.5 and 881.7 nm over 64 channels (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mobility diameter) was continuously measured at 3 min resolution with a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS, TSI, Kripton<sup>85</sup> neutraliser, DMA 3080, CPC 3772, with 2.0/0.2 L min<sup>−1</sup> sheath/aerosol flow rates). Measurements were corrected for diffusion losses and multiple charge effects with the instrument software. Total uncertainty on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was of the order of 5 %. The number size distributions were fitted with log-normal functions to determine the population count (or number) median diameter (CMD).</p>
      <p id="d2e2473">The aerosol effective density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was derived from measurements with a centrifugal particle mass analyzer (CPMA – Cambustion) and an SMPS (TSI, X-ray neutraliser 3087, DMA 3080, CPC 3775 high). A DMA-CPMA-CPC setup was used to measure the aerosol mass-resolved size distributions as described in Heuser et al. (2025a) and Yon et al. (2015). Multiple measurements between 0.03 to 6 femtograms allowed for the calculation of the effective density over the range of soot diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Kasper, 1982; Park et al., 2003). The uncertainty on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was estimated to be 10 %. A complete DMA-CPMA-CPC scan to derive a full <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) curve lasted about 35 min. The scans were performed after soot injection in the chamber, after each compound injected in the chamber and for coated soot, before and after long-term ageing. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) data were fitted with a power-law relation (Park et al., 2003)

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M177" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          to determine the mass-mobility exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the pre-factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is dependent on the morphology of the aerosols (it equals to 3 for spherical-void free particles, and is around 2.2 for soot (Maricq and Xu, 2004; Sorensen, 2011)) and, together with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was used as a proxy for morphological and chemical evolution of the soot over the simulated ageing processes (Park et al., 2003; Sorensen, 2011). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was used to determine the total aerosol mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M185" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicates the values extrapolated at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the SMPS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the corresponding measured number size distribution (the subscript <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. 2 indicates the SMPS channel). As discussed in Heuser et al. (2025a), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  compared well with gravimetric measurements from a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM 1400a – Thermo Scientific). Noteworthy, the mass concentration calculated with Eq. (2) lacks sensitivity to ongoing aerosol physico-chemical processing due to the coarse time resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements.</p>
      <p id="d2e2870">Morphological information of the soot particles were also retrieved using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Soot particles samples were collected over different moments of the experiments using three TEM grids (200-mesh copper grid with a Formvar/carbon film, Agar Scientific) glued onto the Teflon-pore filters (47 mm Nuclepore Whatman, 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m nominal pore size). Sampling was performed with a custom-made stainless-steel filter holder operated at a flow rate of 2–4 L min<sup>−1</sup>. The total sampling time was adjusted to ensure similar area loadings between different samples. Nevertheless, the total number of TEM images acquired varied considerably among experiments and particularly for the aged conditions, ranging from a few tens to more than 300 images per sampled grid set. The TEM images were acquired with a JEOL<sup>®</sup>  100CXII and a JEOL<sup>®</sup>  JEM2010 microscopes and processed using the same protocol as described in Heuser et al. (2025a). A qualitative visual assessment of the TEM images was performed to characterize the aged sampled soot. However, the variation in the number of images across experiments precluded a statistically robust clustering analysis and, by consequence, a more quantitative comparison across the various experimental stages.</p>
      <p id="d2e2900">A single particle soot-photometer (SP2 – Droplet Measurement Technologies, 1 min resolution, Stephens et al., 2003) was used to measure the refractory mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and its size distribution between 89 and 567 nm (volume equivalent diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ve</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), assuming a material density of 1.8 g cm<sup>−3</sup>. The SP2 was calibrated with fullerene-soot material, mass-selected with the CPMA. The calibration curve of fullerene showed comparable coefficients to the most elemental CS1 particles produced at fuel-lean conditions (Heuser et al., 2025a). The measured size distributions from the SP2 were extrapolated based on a lognormal fit to approximate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the full soot size range (Liu et al., 2014). The uncertainty on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated to be 17 %. The ratio of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the SP2 fullerene-calibrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was determined for each experiment prior to coating formation and ranged from 1.2 to 1.8. This ratio was used to convert <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the total soot mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) representing the total carbonaceous mass of soot, including both elemental and organic carbon fractions, according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This approach enabled continuous tracking of the soot mass concentration throughout the experiments. Due to instrumental limits of the SP2 scattering detector, a detailed quantification of the coating thickness (leading-edge-only, LEO-fit) or frequency of thinly and thickly coated rBC cores (delay-time) was not possible, as reported for the same SP2 instrument in a recent experiment in the AIDA (Atmospheric Interactions and Dynamics in the Atmosphere) chamber (Zanatta et al., 2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e3048">Spectral optical properties were monitored with a nephelometer (TSI Model 3563 Integrating Nephelometer, 1 s resolution, sampling flow rate 2 L min<sup>−1</sup>, Anderson et al., 1996), providing the scattering coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 450, 550, and 700 nm, and two Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift monitors (CAPS PMex, Aerodyne Research, both operated at 1 s resolution, sampling flow rate 0.85 L min<sup>−1</sup>, Kebabian et al., 2007; Massoli et al., 2010) measuring the extinction coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 450 and 630 nm. Two additional CAPS single scattering albedo monitors (CAPS PM<sub>SSA</sub>, 1 s resolution, sampling flow rate 0.85 L min<sup>−1</sup>, Onasch et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2024) were additionally deployed in some experiments to provide <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 450 and 630 nm to compare against CAPS PMex data (the scattering signal from the CAPS PM<sub>SSA</sub> was not considered in this analysis). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the CAPS PMex and PM<sub>SSA</sub> agreed within their uncertainty (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The aerosol scattering coefficient measured at angles between 7 and 170° from the nepheleometer was corrected based on Massoli et al. (2009) to obtain the fully integrated 0–180° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by using a real refractive index of 1.95 (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006). Total uncertainty on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated at about 8 %. The scattering Ångström exponent was calculated via the power-law fit of the spectral <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and used to interpolate the scattering coefficient at 630 nm.</p>
      <p id="d2e3206">The aerosol absorption coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 450 and 630 nm was calculated from online measurements throughout each experiment as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the CAPS PMex minus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the nephelometer. The uncertainty on the derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated to range within 10 %–30 %. As fully described in Heuser et al. (2025a), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived with extinction-minus-scattering was compared against three filter-based measurements operating between 375 and 850 nm: the Multi Angle Absorption Photometer (MAAP, Petzold et al., 2005), the Multi-Wavelength Absorbance Analyzer (MWAA, Massabò et al., 2013), and the polar photometer of the University of Milano (PP_UniMI,  Vecchi et al., 2014). The comparison of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 450 and 630 nm shows an average difference of 7 % and a strong correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between extinction-minus-scattering and filter-based techniques, which is within the combined measurement uncertainty. Greater data dispersion was observed for absorption coefficients below 10 Mm<sup>−1</sup>, a value that can be considered the lower detection limit for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the experiments, the measured absorption coefficients ranged from 10 to 10<sup>3</sup> Mm<sup>−1</sup>, indicating that the entire range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the present analysis falls within the reliable measurement range.</p>
      <p id="d2e3347">The gas phase composition was measured during the experiments using a set of gas monitors measuring the concentrations of SO<sub>2</sub> (Horiba APSA370), O<sub>3</sub> (Horiba APOA370), NO<sub><italic>X</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO (Horiba APNA370), NO<sub>2</sub> (Teledyne T500U), and CO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<sub>2</sub> (APEE – ProCeas). To follow the content of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and butanol-D<sub>9</sub> compounds a Proton Transfer Reaction Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS, Kore Technology, Jordan et al., 2009) was used. The atmospheric state of the chamber was tracked throughout the experiments by measurements of the pressure (Baratron type MKS 626AX13TDE (high range)/626AX11TDE (low range)), temperature, and relative humidity (Vaisala HMP234-Hygrometer).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Data analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Experimental evaluation of the absorption enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and coating-to-soot mass ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e3486">Online data were averaged over common base time intervals of 3 min, a value about double the typical mixing time of the chamber, and all volumetric quantities were converted into standard pressure and temperature conditions (1013.25 mbar, 273.15 K).</p>
      <p id="d2e3489">The mass absorption cross section (MAC) of the soot particles was calculated at 450 and 630 nm at 3 min resolution for each experiment as the ratio of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The uncertainty on the 3 min MAC was determined as the propagation of the uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %–30 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 %) and averages at about 30 %, increasing throughout each experiment with decreasing the number and mass aerosol concentration. The absorption enhancement factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated at 450 and 630 nm and 3 min resolution as the ratio of the MAC after the coating generation to its value prior to coating generation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MAC<sub>coated</sub>/MAC<sub>prior</sub>). The MAC<sub>prior</sub> was estimated for each experiment as the average MAC for the 60–90 min prior to the precursor injection and the start of the secondary aerosol generation. The uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, estimated with error propagation from the MAC values, was estimated on average at about 35 %.</p>
      <p id="d2e3614">The measurements from the SMPS, CPMA and SP2 were combined to retrieve the bulk coating-to-soot mass ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 3 min resolution during experiments. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of the secondary aerosol mass deposited on the soot either due to condensation or coagulation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">deposited</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the soot mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">deposited</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">deposited</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was retrieved by subtracting the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (as derived from SP2 measurements) and the mass of secondary aerosol resulting from nucleation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nuc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M266" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">deposited</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nuc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined from full integration of (Eq. 2), while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nuc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated by integrating Eq. (2) over the size range of nucleating secondary aerosol and using the corresponding effective density from CPMA measurements. For the coated aerosol the first size-resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measurement was performed about 60 min after coating generation, i.e. for already significantly processed/coated soot, then repeated after 15 h ageing. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is therefore the most reliable around these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) scans and beyond this point is an approximation that is only sensitive to significant coating evolution via size changes. To minimize bias and potential misinterpretation, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were only considered after an initial processing period of 15 min, when most significant evolution in the coating experiments is expected. The uncertainty on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated as the propagation of the uncertainties of the individual masses and averages at around 50 %, increasing, as for the MAC, throughout the experiments due to the dilution of the chamber volume.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Mie core-shell calculations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e3929">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also theoretically calculated using the Mie-core-shell optical theory for varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to compare one of the most common modelling approaches with our measurements. In the Mie core-shell an aerosol particle is represented as a volume-equivalent sphere coated with a homogeneous layer with a uniform thickness. This enables the representation of the coated particles via an inner diameter (core particle) and a total diameter (particle/core and coating/shell).</p>
      <p id="d2e3959">The Mie core-shell calculations were done by assuming that the soot particles have a homogeneous size-independent composition. Additionally, a fixed reference soot number size distribution was chosen to represent the aerosol core, translated from mobility size to volume-equivalent size based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measurements and the derived material density of the soot (Heuser et al., 2025a). The size distribution taken just prior to SO<sub>2</sub> injection during the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high1 experiment was chosen as a representative soot core distribution. The outer diameter due to coating formation on soot was determined using the densities of the soot, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA calculated from the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Refractive indices for the core and the shell were taken from the literature and from CESAM experiments. For the core soot, two complex refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values were used at 450 and 630 nm: (i) the most commonly assumed value for BC of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006) and (ii) a second value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Habib and Vervisch, 1988) selected to actively represent a value on the other end of the complex refractive index range generally associated with soot. For the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> coating, values of the complex refractive index were retrieved from control experiments described in Heuser et al. (2025a), in which a value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (450 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (630 nm) was found to best describe the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> generated in CESAM at 30 % relative humidity. For the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA, a wavelength-independent real part of 1.5 with a negligible imaginary part was used based on previous studies (Denjean et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2010; Schnaiter et al., 2005).</p>
      <p id="d2e4178">To determine the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated once for an uncoated aerosol using classical Mie theory and the size distribution of the soot core and then with Mie-core-shell for progressively increasing outer diameters for varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1 to 5 in 0.1 steps. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>( <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated as the ratio of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the coated and uncoated soot for the given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e4293"><bold>(A)</bold> Time evolution of number size distribution as a function of the mobility diameter for the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high1 experiment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the start of the secondary aerosol generation). The evolution of the count median diameters (CMD) of identified modes determined from log-normal fits of the size distribution is overlayed (soot: black, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>: red, green). Error bars are omitted for clarity. Vertical lines indicate the occurrence of various events during the experiment (injection of soot, water vapour, O<sub>3</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>; start and stop of irradiation, indicated as lamp on and lamp off). Time evolution of the <bold>(B)</bold> count median diameter (CMD) of the soot peak mode, <bold>(C)</bold> bulk coating-to-soot mass ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(D)</bold> absorption enhancement factor at 630 nm for the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high1, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high2 and H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-low experiments. <bold>(E, F, G)</bold> Illustrative TEM pictures for the fresh, coated, and aged soot particles from the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high1 experiment.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15831/2026/acp-26-15831-2026-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d2e4483">The time evolution of number size distribution, CMD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 630 nm, as well as TEM pictures for the fresh, coated, and aged soot particles for the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA coating experiments are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. Timelines for all the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and SOA coating experiments, also including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 450 nm, are shown in Figs. S2–S3, and S11–S16 in the Supplement. Timelines and results of the ageing control experiments are shown in   Figs. S17–S23. The size-resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured for the different control and coating experiments is shown in Fig. 3. Table 2 synthesises the physico-chemical and optical properties of the fresh, coated and aged soot aerosols.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Pre-coating soot evolution and ageing control experiments</title>
      <p id="d2e4597">The start point for the experiments is an about two-hour-old soot aerosol for which a complete set of properties was measured to determine an initial reference. In its fresh state the investigated soot has a lacy fractal morphology, as shown in TEM images (Figs. 1e, 2e), quantified by a mass-mobility exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04. The soot shows a mono-modal size distribution with an initial count median diameter CMD around 100–120 nm, increasing to values between 150 and 250 nm due to coagulation within the first 2 h of experiments (Figs. 1a, 2a). For the CMD of 200 nm the fresh soot particles have an average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 232 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 kg m<sup>−3</sup> (Fig. 3). The soot mass concentration at the end of this characterisation and just prior to the water vapour injection ranges between 13 and 169 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> for the different experiments.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e4671"><bold>(A)</bold> Time evolution of number size distribution as a function of the mobility diameter for the SOA-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coating experiment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the start of the secondary aerosol generation). The evolution of the count median diameter (CMD) of different identified modes determined from log-normal fits of the size distribution is shown (soot: black, SOA: red). Error bars are omitted for clarity. Vertical lines indicate the occurrence of various events during the experiments (injection of soot, water vapour, O<sub>3</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene). Time evolution of the <bold>(B)</bold> count median diameter (CMD) of the soot peak mode, <bold>(C)</bold> bulk coating-to-soot mass ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(D)</bold> absorption enhancement factor at 630 nm for the SOA–S<sub>ref</sub>, SOA<sub>high</sub>–S<sub>high</sub>, and SOA–S<sub>low</sub> experiments. <bold>(E, F, G)</bold> Illustrative TEM pictures for the fresh, coated, and aged soot particles from the SOA–S<sub>ref</sub> experiment.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15831/2026/acp-26-15831-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4796">As shown in  Figs. 1a and 2a, no significant changes in the CMD or number concentration are observed due to water vapour injection, with the exception of minimal loss of particles that can be attributed to a physical washout and the short pressure change in the chamber. Similarly, no significant effect on the soot physico-chemical properties is observed due to ozone injection and the following 2–3 h prior to the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and SOA generation. Measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) show only slight differences, within uncertainties, between pre-coating steps and fresh soot (Fig. 3), indicating no significant chemical or morphological changes. The MAC values show a consistent minor declining trend during the pre-coating steps, as indicated by the decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 1d, 2d). This decrease remains however well inside one standard deviation of the MAC values of fresh soot (Heuser et al., 2025a, Fig. S1). To account for this minor evolution, as described in Sect. 2.3.1, the reference MAC<sub>prior</sub> to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken by averaging values over the last undisturbed suspension period prior to the coating generation, corresponding to about 60 to 90 min.</p>
      <p id="d2e4872">No significant changes in the soot physico-chemical and optical properties are likewise observed for the control experiments for the various conditions tested. The effective density measurements (Fig. 3a) and the mobility exponents determined from them are found to be rather stable compared to the fresh soot and the pre-coating steps. The only exception was a moderate increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observed during the irradiated humid experiments, both in absence and in presence of ozone (Figs. S22–S23). These changes in effective density indicate that some, albeit minor, physicochemical transformations occurred during the experiments. Specifically, illumination under humid conditions may promote the photooxidation of surface organic carbon, as previously reported by Han et al. (2012). In the humid experiment with ozone, the increase in effective density is likely associated with ozone uptake by the particles, consistent with previous chamber studies (Kamm et al., 1999; Zelenay et al., 2011). The long-term ageing control experiments, named Soot coagulation dry 1 and 2, also showed some deviations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with values around 1.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01. These deviations are however attributed to measurement bias due to the very low aerosol concentrations after 24 h of coagulation and dilution. The MAC values remain for all conditions inside one standard deviation of the values of fresh soot as reported in Heuser et al. (2025a) (Fig. S1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Soot-H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> coating and ageing</title>
      <p id="d2e4942">As shown in Fig. 1a and b, the start of the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> generation leads to a progressive increase of soot CMD due to the condensation of coating material on the particles, reflected in a marked increase of the soot <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3b), as well as to the production of new modes associated with homogeneous particle formation below CMDs of 120 nm. The estimated H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> mass deposited on the soot due to condensation, but also coagulation with the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> mode, is quantified via the bulk coating-to-soot mass ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1c). The H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-low condition (lower OH oxidant availability) produces lower coating mass with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increasing from a value of about 1.0 roughly 15 min after the beginning of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> generation, to 1.2 about 3 h later. Conversely, the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high conditions (higher OH availability) lead <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to a quick rise to around 2.0–2.2 and a continuous increase to 3.5–3.9. The continued accumulation of coating material on soot induces a progressive increase in absorption (Fig. 1c–d). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 630 nm average at a maximum of around 1.3–1.4  (Fig. 1d), with values at 450 nm exceeding 1.5 (Fig. S2).</p>
      <p id="d2e5134">The retrieved average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 1.89 to 2.01, and remains comparable with the value for fresh soot, indicating minimal changes to the shape of the lacy fractal particles after the initial coating addition. Nonetheless, TEM images depict a more heterogeneous mixing state, with both partial and fully coated particles, and both compacted and fractal-like soot (Fig. 1f; more illustrative images are shown in Fig. S4).</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e5150">Effective density measured as a function of the mobility diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), for <bold>(A)</bold> the different control experiments, and for <bold>(B)</bold> the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and <bold>(C)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA coating experiments. The power-law fits of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on Eq. (1) (coloured lines) and the fitting uncertainties (coloured-shaded areas) are shown. As a reference, the measurements for fresh soot are shown in <bold>(A)</bold>. Additional plots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the coating experiments are provided in Fig. S8.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15831/2026/acp-26-15831-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5265">A decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> down to about 1.0–1.3 is measured at both wavelengths after 15 h of simulated dark ageing of the coated soot (grey area Figs. 1b–1d, S2), despite the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showing no significant differences. The decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is likely associated to a size reduction of the absorbing soot core, as observed in TEM images analysis (Figs. 1g,  S4), showing significant particles' restructuration. This restructuration is assumed to be caused by the continued accumulation of coating on the soot by condensation and coagulation, which homogenises the soot core structure while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains relatively unchanged. This continuous coating formation is supported by a slight observed increase of both CMD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3b), and a decrease in residual O<sub>3</sub> and soot number concentration.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e5355">Physico-chemical and optical properties of the fresh and the coated soot aerosol. The given properties of the fresh soot are retrieved in Heuser et al. (2025a) and corresponds to soot after 60 min in suspension in the CESAM chamber. The properties of the coated soot aerosols are given at two stages: the “coated”, representing the average of soot properties between 15 and 240 min after coating formation, and the “aged”, representing the coated soot properties averaged between 1000 and 1300 min after coating formation, i.e. after the long-term ageing. The average and standard deviation of the bulk coating-to-soot mass ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the absorption enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 450 and 630 nm wavelengths are provided. The mobility exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values are reported for the “coated” soot.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6">Fresh soot aerosol (Heuser et al., 2025a) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CMD (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">MAC (m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup>) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">450 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">630 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">145 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6">Coated soot aerosol (this work) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">450 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">630 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-high2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA-S<sub>ref</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA-S<sub>low</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>


</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Soot-SOA coating and ageing</title>
      <p id="d2e6220">In contrast with the slower H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> experiments, the injection of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene precursor in the O<sub>3</sub>–rich chamber leads to a quasi-instantaneous start of the SOA generation marked by a rapid appearance and growth of a mode below 100 nm mobility diameter associated with new particle formation (Fig. 2a, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data Fig. 3c). The start of the SOA generation also marks an increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the condensation of coating material on the soot particles (Fig. 2c), supported by a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in the soot containing fraction above 100 nm diameter. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rapidly reaches an average value of around 3.3 for SOA-S<sub>low</sub> (experiments with the highest precursor-to-soot-ratio), and of 1.2 to 1.3 for the SOA-S<sub>ref</sub> (initial soot mass comparable to H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> experiments) and SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub> experiments (about twice the soot and precursor concentration than SOA-S<sub>ref</sub>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rises to 2.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 (SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub>), 2.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 (SOA-S<sub>ref</sub>), and 2.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 (SOA-S<sub>low</sub>), indicating that the coating formation induced a transition towards more spherical and compacted particle morphologies. This restructuring is also reflected by the marked and simultaneous decrease in the CMD for SOA-S<sub>ref</sub> and SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub>. In contrast, the CMD of SOA-S<sub>low</sub> increases rapidly after coating formation. The TEM images additionally support the coating-induced soot restructuring in all experiments. They show that the majority of soot collapsed to form small and compact aggregates (Fig. 2f–g; more illustrative images in Fig. S5), and, when visible from microscopy, the coating is identified to encapsulate soot particles. The net increase in CMD observed for SOA-S<sub>low</sub> is then attributed to the larger amount of condensed coating material for this experiment, which masks the reduction in particle size associated with soot restructuring (Figs. 2b,  S3). After this initial evolution, the soot CMD for SOA-S<sub>ref</sub> and SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub> stabilizes as a consequence of minimal further SOA deposition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene precursor consumed) and negligible coagulation (as discussed in Sect. S2, Fig. S10). In contrast, for SOA-S<sub>low</sub> the CMD of the soot peak is found to continuously decrease, interpreted as ongoing restructuration.</p>
      <p id="d2e6553">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured at 450 and 630 nm rapidly rises following <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the SOA coating on soot establishes. Then, until the ageing, it remains rather stable at values between 1.2 and 1.4 for SOA-S<sub>ref</sub> (Fig. 2d) and SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub>. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to 2 are measured for SOA-S<sub>low</sub> right after coating starts due to larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, decreasing afterwards following the CMD decrease and its underlying restructuration (Fig. S3).</p>
      <p id="d2e6647">After 15 h of ageing in the dark, a significant decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.83–1.04) at rather constant CMD is observed for the SOA-S<sub>ref</sub> and SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub> experiments. The reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, concurrently with the absence of further SOA production, negligible coagulation, invariance of CMD, and a slight reduction in the soot density, indicates a loss of coating mass on the particles. Such a loss can occur during the continuous dilution of the chamber volume, despite minimal, which can lead to the evaporation of some of the more volatile compounds of the SOA (Grieshop et al., 2007; Metcalf et al., 2013), while low-volatile organics remain on the soot and continue to affect the absorption (Zhang et al., 2023). Such a loss of coating may cause further compaction of the soot (Corbin et al., 2023), as TEM pictures show dominantly collapsed particles (Fig. 2g). Therefore, the pronounced decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (down to values lower than 1) after 15 h of ageing is attributed to the combined effects of coating mass loss through evaporation and continued soot restructuring, which further reduced the particle size relative to the pre-coated soot.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Impact of coating dynamics and morphological restructuring on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e6761">The results presented in this work evidence that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends not only on the quantity of coating material deposited on the soot, but also on size and morphological modifications that affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> magnitude and evolution, modulated by different coating dynamics and ageing.</p>
      <p id="d2e6786">In the experiments, larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed when aggregate shapes are more widespread and lacy aggregates are present. On the contrary, lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are measured for all conditions with more compacted soot aggregates. This is especially prominent when comparing the clusters of the observations of SOA-S<sub>ref</sub> and SOA<sub>high</sub>-S<sub>high</sub> and can be explained by the collapse of the soot aggregate, reducing particle size and optical absorption cross section (Kahnert and Devasthale, 2011) while the coating mass remains constant. Morphological restructuration is observed both directly at the early stages of the SOA coating and for aged H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-coated soot, indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can evolve further after an initial coating formation. This size effect can be strong enough to reduce the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to values lower than the pre-coating state (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1) even with light coatings, as for aged SOA-coated soot.</p>
      <p id="d2e6902">The shape, i.e. restructuration of the particles, and the coating distribution are found to vary with experiments and ageing time. The slower production of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> impacts the shape and thus the morphology of the soot less in the initial coating formation stages than the much faster SOA formation, which rapidly reduces mobility diameter and compacts soot particles. Only after long term ageing, the majority of particles for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> experiments is restructured, accompanied by a reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>for the aged and collapsed H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-coated soot. Based on previous flow reactor-type measurements observing soot compaction during rapid H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> condensation (Khalizov et al., 2009b; Zhang et al., 2008), it can be assumed that the difference is not purely compound-related but likely a result of the dynamics of the coating formation.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e6992">Absorption enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 630 nm as a function of the coating-to-soot mass ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <bold>(A)</bold> the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and <bold>(B)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA coating experiments. Symbols and color separate the measured data of different experiments. Slightly transparent values are measured during the initial 60 min and points with black edges are taken after the ageing. Groupings of pre- (green) and post-ageing (red) values are manually highlighted using coloured ellipses. Additionally, the theoretical calculations using the Mie core-shell approximation for the different coating types are shown. The EF-core-shell curve is shown for the value of the real part corresponding to the refractive index associated to the coating material: a value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SOA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>. The refractive index of the soot core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is set at <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, representative of BC based on Bond and Bergstrom (2006), and at <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Habib and Vervisch, 1988), representing a value on the other end of the refractive index range associated with soot. Error bars are omitted for clarity. A version of this figure including error bars is shown in Fig. S7.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15831/2026/acp-26-15831-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Misprediction of the absorption enhancement by core-shell and fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assumption</title>
      <p id="d2e7174">Experimental observations in the present study suggest that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be significantly mispredicted if restructuration and size changes are not taken into account, a process frequently observed in ambient observations (Colbeck et al., 1990; Corbin et al., 2023; Fierce et al., 2020; Khalizov et al., 2009a; Wang et al., 2023). However, this is not possible with the commonly used idealized Mie calculations, as they rely on volumetric-based sizing, nor with fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approximation. Implications of this drawback are visualized in Fig. 4 (630 nm) and Fig. S6 (450 nm), which each contain two predictions of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relation based on Mie core-shell calculations for each of the two coating types. The calculated curves differ in the refractive index assumptions for the soot core, which was selected to represent both pure BC and soot, as well as values with contrasting real and imaginary components. The effect of changes in morphology is best shown in the SOA results (Fig. 4b), where clusters of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be observed. These can be described as core-shell by varying the refractive index, even though neither the soot's nor the coating's intrinsic optical properties change between experiments. The cases for which the modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> align more closely with measured ones are conditions with freshly well-established coatings. While for SOA they happen instantly, for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, this only applies for conditions with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This is in line with the observations of Liu et al. (2017) showing that a sufficient enhancement is only possible when a certain mixing ratio or threshold is reached. In this case, a core-shell internal mixing approximation may be potentially suitable for describing it. Observations from this study show that, in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> investigated, the core-shell approximation fails to predict <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the other conditions, i.e., uncollapsed partially coated soot with significant particle-to-particle heterogeneity and aged coated particles. Previous works using both models and experimental studies have shown that the distribution of the coating and position of the soot in the coated particles (e.g., partial coating, embedded soot) can have a significant impact on the absorption enhancement and that the shape of the particle can influence this distribution (Adachi et al., 2010; Fierce et al., 2016, 2020; Liu et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2025). Adachi et al. (2010) noted relevant inhomogeneity in particle-coating mixing, particularly for elongated non-collapsed particles. Such an inhomogeneity is likely the cause of the systematic differences between the observed and core-shell predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in particular during a slow coating generation.</p>
      <p id="d2e7358">Compared to experimental observations, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> predictions at 630 nm overestimate absorption by up to 60 % in the Mie-based retrieval, and by up to 40 % for the, commonly used, fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 1.5, but increasing up to 75 % for fresh partial coatings or soot that has undergone restructuration. Experimental conditions characterized by established coating and only limited soot restructuring exhibit improved agreement between predicted and measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, although underestimations between 2 % and 30 % persist.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Comparison with previous chamber studies investigating soot ageing</title>
      <p id="d2e7402">Only a limited number of chamber studies have examined both the formation and subsequent ageing of coatings on soot particles. Although their soot generation methods, coating protocols, and the extent of soot and coating characterization differ from those employed in the present study, two studies, the ones by Schnaiter et al. (2005) and by Metcalf et al. (2013), investigated the formation and ageing of organic coatings on polydisperse soot and are discussed below. To the best of our knowledge, no comparable chamber studies examining the formation and ageing of sulfuric acid coatings on soot have been reported.</p>
      <p id="d2e7405">Schnaiter et al. (2005) investigated the impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA coatings on diesel soot using experiments conducted in the 84 m<sup>3</sup> AIDA chamber. In their study, the soot underwent five successive coating steps through the in situ ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene before being aged for an additional 10 h in the chamber, resulting in total experiment durations of up to 25 h. They reported absorption enhancement factors of 1.8–2.1 at wavelengths of 450, 550, and 700 nm for collapsed soot aggregates. These values are at the upper end of the range observed in our SOA experiments, particularly for the SOA-S<sub>low</sub> experiment, which most closely resembles the conditions in terms of the soot-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene precursor ratio as investigated at the AIDA chamber. In contrast to our observations, Schnaiter et al. (2005) found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained nearly constant during the ageing period. This discrepancy is likely explained by fundamental differences in the experimental protocols, particularly the ageing conditions. In our experiments, the aerosol was aged under slight continuous dilution and in the absence of additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene precursor. Under these conditions, the more volatile SOA components gradually evaporated, leading to a reduction in the coating mass. In the AIDA experiments, however, the soot experienced continuous SOA growth throughout the ageing period. This was achieved by first introducing ozone into the chamber and subsequently supplying a continuous flow of air saturated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene vapor, thereby sustaining ongoing SOA condensation onto the soot particles. These conditions maintained the particle coating and likely explain why <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained nearly constant during the 10 h ageing period. Schnaiter et al. (2005) further showed that the Mie core–shell model cannot accurately reproduce the optical behaviour of thinly coated soot particles, although its agreement with observations improves with increasing coating-to-soot ratios.</p>
      <p id="d2e7484">Metcalf et al. (2013) performed chamber experiments with fullerene soot, a surrogate for fractal carbonaceous particles, in the 28 m<sup>3</sup> Caltech Teflon chamber. The soot was exposed to several types of organic coatings, including SOA formed from the high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> photooxidation of naphthalene and from the high- and low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene. The experiments consisted of an initial irradiation period lasting several hours, during which SOA formed and the chamber temperature increased, followed by several hours of dilution accompanied by a gradual decrease in temperature. Consistent with our observations, Metcalf et al. (2013) reported absorption enhancement factors of 1.25–1.35 at 405 nm and 1.15–1.30 at 781 nm for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA experiments. They also observed that the SOA coating partially evaporated during the course of the experiments, particularly during the dilution phase. The extent of evaporation depended on the chamber temperature, both during the irradiation period, which influenced the formation of more or less semi-volatile SOA components, and during dilution, where the magnitude of the temperature decrease controlled the degree of evaporation. In our experiments, temperature variations during dilution were limited to 1–2 K, suggesting that changes in coating mass were primarily driven by dilution rather than by temperature-induced volatility changes. Unlike our observations, Metcalf et al. (2013) demonstrated that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be accurately predicted when the coating mass or thickness is known and the particle can be represented by a simple core–shell geometry. However, this approach relies on fullerene spherical particles instead of fractal soot, thereby limiting the representativeness of the results for atmospheric conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e7540">Overall, these previous studies have provided evidence that coating-induced absorption enhancement occurs and provide key complementary observations to our study. However, they have important limitations because they provide only limited information on the simultaneous evolution of particle coating and morphology throughout the different stages of the coating process and, in the case of Metcalf et al. (2013), rely on simplified particle morphologies. Consequently, it remains difficult to directly compare these studies or derive predictive relationships applicable to atmospheric soot. The present work addresses this gap by systematically characterizing both coating evolution and soot restructuring throughout the ageing process, so to move towards a mechanistic understanding of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although such measurements are experimentally challenging, this approach provides new insights into the underlying processes and demonstrates that this combined characterization is essential for developing a predictive understanding of coating-induced absorption enhancement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Implications on radiative forcing estimations</title>
      <p id="d2e7564">The inability of the Mie core-shell and fixed 1.5 value to systematically predict <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has consequences for the estimates of the single scattering albedo (SSA, ratio of scattering to extinction) and radiative forcing (RF) for BC-containing aerosols. An illustrative example is given in Table 3 reporting the differences in estimated and measured SSA and the resulting relative differences in RF at 630 nm, for two assumed surface albedos. The SSA in Table 3 was estimated from Mie core-shell theory (SSA<sub>MieCS</sub>) assuming the same complex refractive indices and particle representation as described in Sect. 2.3.2, or by assuming a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.5 (SSA<sub>fixed−1.5</sub>). To note that in the case of fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, only the impact of the coating on absorption is considered for the calculation of SSA<sub>fixed−1.5</sub>, while scattering is assumed unchanged. These values were compared to the measured SSA during experiments (SSA<sub>meas</sub>). The signal by the SOA and H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> nucleating modes was subtracted from the total scattering and extinction when calculating SSA<sub>meas</sub>. Further details on the SSA calculations are provided in Sect. S3.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e7677">Average values of the single scattering albedo measured (SSA<sub>meas</sub>) and calculated at 630 nm based on the Mie core-shell approach (SSA<sub>MieCS</sub>) for two refractive indices of the soot core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) set at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Habib and Vervisch, 1988) and for fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.5 (SSA<sub>fixed−1.5</sub>). The corresponding associated fractional change in radiative forcing, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at 630 nm due to the SSA change is reported for varying aerosol processing states of the performed experiments. Data corresponds to a surface albedo (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.2 and 0.7.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time after</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SSA<sub>meas</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SSA<sub>MieCS</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SSA<sub>MieCS</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SSA<sub>fixed−1.5</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">coating</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">measured</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">calculated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">calculated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">calculated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">generation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MieCS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MieCS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[min]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col8" colsep="1">MieCS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col9" nameend="col10" colsep="1">MieCS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col11" nameend="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15 to 60 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">-high1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60 to 240 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (aged)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15 to 60 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">-high2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60 to 240 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (aged)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15 to 60 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60 to 240 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA-S<sub>ref</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15 to 60 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60 to 240 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1000 (aged)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA<sub>high</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15 to 60 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">-S<sub>high</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60 to 240 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (aged)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA-S<sub>low</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15 to 60 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60 to 240 (coated)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e9013">The calculated and measured SSA values were then used to determine the change in RF by utilizing the following equation (Haywood and Shine, 1995), providing the instantaneous forcing for a thin layer of absorbing aerosols at the top-of-atmosphere:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M624" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">at</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fractional day length, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the solar constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">at</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the atmospheric transmission, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the fractional cloud amount, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the aerosol single scattering albedo, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the aerosol upscatter fraction of scattering, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the aerosol optical depth, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the surface reflectivity. Despite Eq. (4) provides a simplistic estimate of RF considering only aerosol-radiation interactions and not accounting for changes compared to pre-industrial conditions, it can be used to quantify the impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mispredictions on BC radiative effect. The relative change of RF due to a change from SSA<sub>meas</sub> and SSA<sub>MieCS</sub> (or SSA<sub>fixed−1.5</sub>) was determined as:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M637" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MieCS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MieCS</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MieCS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        For Eq. (5) two values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.2, bare soil, and 0.7, snow/ice) were used as exemplary values. The upscatter fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated from a backscattering ratio of 0.27, determined from experimental data using the equations in Moosmüller and Ogren (2017). Calculations for SSA and RF were performed by separating data for fresh coatings (up to 1 h from the onset of secondary aerosol formation), established coatings (second and third hour), and aged coatings (more than 15 h). The uncertainty on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RF was estimated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % based on the error propagation formula and considering only the uncertainty on the measured SSA (12 %–25 %, Heuser et al., 2025a) and the sensitivity of the modelled SSA on the assumed complex refractive (15 % on average based on the comparison of the SSA values calculated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e9447">The results in Table 3 show that for conditions that are associated with collapsed soot (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-aged and SOA), the core-shell calculations underestimate the SSA on average between 12 % and 56 % for early, medium, and latter stages of processing. This underestimation results in an overestimation of the RF averaging at around 46 %, but reaching up to 84 %, for a bare soil scenario (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), when compared to RF estimates based on SSA<sub>meas</sub>. For processing stages where coatings are forming and/or the soot undergoes limited restructuration, SSA values are generally found to be overestimated by 2 % to 122 %. This indicates that not only is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overestimated by the Mie-based calculations for these conditions, but so is the scattering. These SSA overpredictions lead to an average underestimation of RF of about 17 % for the different stages of the experiments in a bare soil scenario. The impact of the SSA misprediction on the RF reduces with increasing surface albedo, being about 20 % (collapsed soot) and 10 % (inhomogeneous coating and non-collapsed soot) for a surface albedo of 0.7 associated with fresh snow.</p>
      <p id="d2e9503">The common alternative of a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.5 leads to similar SSA and RF mispredictions. Compared to the observations, the SSA at 630 nm is consistently underestimated, in turn leading to an RF overestimation ranging between 6 % and 58 % in the bare soil and between 4 % and 20 % for the snow scenario.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Summary and concluding remarks</title>
      <p id="d2e9525">This study provides a laboratory-based investigation to advance the mechanistic understanding of soot <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its variability. Taking advantage of the long aerosol lifetime in the CESAM chamber, experiments were designed to explore the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across a variety of atmospherically relevant processes. The range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in this study for polydispersed soot under varying coating and ageing conditions lies within laboratory observations for uniform coating on monodispersed soot (Fierce et al., 2020; Peng et al., 2016) and ambient measurements in background, suburban, and urban environments (Cappa et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2017; Zeng et al., 2024). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extends up to values of 5, representing most common urban and suburban conditions (Cappa et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2017; Zeng et al., 2024), even if values as high as 10 or more are observed in urban and suburban atmospheres and during biomass burning events (McMeeking et al., 2014; Taylor et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Zeng et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e9593">Results from the present analysis support the evidence of a correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the coating amount on soot. We highlight, however, the ambiguity of this relation based on experimental observations with varying coating and soot properties. The measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the corresponding particle physico-chemical properties confirm the impact of the morphological organization of both the soot and the coating-soot system on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our controlled laboratory experiments show that the coating formation dynamics, coating type (non-volatile/volatile), and subsequent ageing affect the composition, morphology, and size of the soot and the coating-soot system, whose combined effect ultimately rules the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> magnitude and its temporal evolution. Based on this dependence, the range of measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cannot systematically be predicted by the Mie core-shell approximation or by a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value, as commonly used in models.</p>
      <p id="d2e9663">Improving radiative forcing predictions requires models to account for the evolution of both particle and coating properties beyond coating thickness alone, in order to capture changes in optical properties, particularly the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its evolution. Additional considerations include inhomogeneities in particle coatings, which we found to depend on the coating generation process, as well as the effects of morphological organization of both soot and coatings, which influence the entire soot lifetime.</p>
      <p id="d2e9677">In order to achieve this objective, previous studies have proposed empirical adjustments of the core-shell model to reconcile with laboratory and ambient observations. These took into account morphological effects to describe single particle mixing state (Fierce et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2017) and particle-to-particle heterogeneity in mixing state (Fierce et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2023; Zeng et al., 2024). While these empirically determined adjustments allow for an improved prediction of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, they are often constrained to specific cases and are limited in general applicability.</p>
      <p id="d2e9692">More reliable approaches can be envisaged by using more advanced spectral optical theories, such as discrete dipole approximation (DDA), T-matrix, Rayleigh–Debye–Gans for coated fractal aggregate (RDG-CFA), or others (Adachi et al., 2010; Lefevre et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017). As these require detailed information on the soot and coating properties and generally also higher computational resources, they have not found wide use in large-scale models in the past decades. However, recent studies show that progressively increasing consideration of BC mixing state and nonsphericity in models leads to more accurate estimates of BC radiative forcing (Chen et al., 2024; Fierce et al., 2025; Romshoo et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2023; Zeng et al., 2024). In line with these studies, this systematic laboratory investigation stresses the need for more sophisticated approaches than core-shell Mie or fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approximation to provide accurate calculations of BC absorption enhancement. The physical, chemical, and optical datasets in this study, which are made openly available to the scientific community (all data doi are listed in Table 1), can provide support for such model developments. The experimental data (such as size, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be used to test and evaluate model parameterizations, in particular optical modules, and including machine learning and neural network approaches (e.g., Beeler et al., 2026). Nonetheless, more experimental investigation is required, extending to varying chemical systems and ageing conditions. With laboratory experiments being most commonly used for such mechanistic studies, we advise that setups which simulate BC coating formation under very rapid dynamics (such as flow tubes or simulation chambers considering short ageing times) should be used with care, as these approaches may produce overly idealised observations.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e9737">The CESAM data used in this study are available through the Database of Atmospheric Simulation Chamber Studies (DASCS) of the EUROCHAMP Data Centre (<uri>https://data.eurochamp.org/data-access/chamber-experiments/</uri>, last access: 17 July 2026) also available via the ACTRIS data portal (<uri>https://data.actris.eu/</uri>, last access: 17 July 2026) with the identifiers listed in Table 1. The core-shell optical calculations were performed with PyMieScatt, which is available at <uri>https://github.com/bsumlin/PyMieScatt</uri> (last access: 17 July 2026, Sumlin et al., 2018).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e9749">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15831-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15831-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e9758">CDB and JFD conceived the study. JH, CDB, and JFD designed the experiments and discussed the results. JH conducted the experiments with contributions by CDB, JY, MC, AB, EP, MZ, LR, AM, CY, SC, PL, MM, PF, BPV, and JFD. MM and DF performed transmission microscopy measurements. JH performed the full data analysis under the supervision of CDB and JFD and with contributions from JY, MZ, LR, AM, CY, MC, and DF. BPV, as PI of the CESAM facility, contributed to full experiment realization and management. PL provided the SP2 used in the experiments. JY provided the CPMA used in the experiments. CDB provided funding acquisition and project administration. JH, CDB, and JFD wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and commented on the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e9764">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e9770">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e9776">The authors gratefully acknowledge CNRS-INSU, Université Paris Est Créteil, Université Paris Cité, and OSU-EFLUVE for supporting CESAM platform as a component of ACTRIS Research Infrastructure. This platform also benefits from the support of ACTRIS-FR, registered on the Roadmap of the French Ministry of Research. The authors thank AERIS for curating and distributing the data produced by CESAM chamber through ACTRIS portal (<uri>https://dc.actris.nilu.no/</uri>, last access: 17 July 2026) and ACTRIS DC ASC Unit (formerly known as EUROCHAMP DC, <uri>https://data.eurochamp.org</uri>, last access: 17 July 2026). Patrick Ginot is acknowledged for logistic support with SP2 operations. Contributions by Patrick Ausset, Mouad Essani, Gael Noyalet, Vera Bernardoni, Dario Massabò, Federico Mazzei, Brice Temime-Roussel, Roberta Vecchi, and Virginia Vernocchi to experimental activities are gratefully acknowledged. Helpful comments by two anonymous reviewers and by Dr. Schnaiter are gratefully acknowledged.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e9787">This study has been supported by the French National Research Agency (Agence Nationale de la Recherche, ANR) through the B2C project (grant no. ANR-19-CE01-0024-01), by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut national des sciences de l’Univers, French National program LEFE-CHAT (Les Enveloppes Fluides et l’Environnement – Chimie Atmosphérique) through the BACON project. This work has received funding from the TNA activity of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme through the EUROCHAMP-2020 Infrastructure Activity under grant agreement No 730997. It has also been supported by DIM Qi<sup>2</sup> and Paris Ile-de-France Region. L. Renzi and M. Zanatta were partially supported by ITINERIS project (IR0000032), the Italian Integrated Environmental Research Infrastructures System (D.D. n. 130/2022 - CUP B53C22002150006), funded by EU – Next Generation EU PNRR-Mission 4 “Education and Research”.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e9803">This paper was edited by Gunnar Myhre and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Chung, S. H., and Buseck, P. R.: Shapes of soot aerosol particles and implications for their effects on climate, J. Geophys. Res., 115, 2009JD012868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012868</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Marshall, S. F., Laucks, M. L., Charlson, R. J., Waggoner, A. P., Ogren, J. A., Caldow, R., Holm, R. L., Quant, F. R., Sem, G. J., Wiedensohler, A., Ahlquist, N. A., and Bates, T. S.: Performance Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 967–986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0967:PCOAHS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0967:PCOAHS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Asmi, E., Sipkens, T. A., Saturno, J., Backman, J., Vasilatou, K., Weingartner, E., Keller, A., Ciupek, K., Müller, T., Babu Suja, A., Močnik, G., Drinovec, L., Eleftheriadis, K., Gini, M. I., Nowak, A., and Corbin, J. C.: Mass absorption cross-section of ambient black carbon aerosols – a review, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 9, 17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01288-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-025-01288-2</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Baldo, C., Formenti, P., Nowak, S., Chevaillier, S., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Di Biagio, C., Doussin, J.-F., Ignatyev, K., Dagsson-Waldhauserova, P., Arnalds, O., MacKenzie, A. R., and Shi, Z.: Distinct chemical and mineralogical composition of Icelandic dust compared to northern African and Asian dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13521–13539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13521-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-13521-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Baldo, C., Formenti, P., Di Biagio, C., Lu, G., Song, C., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Doussin, J.-F., Dagsson-Waldhauserova, P., Arnalds, O., Beddows, D., MacKenzie, A. R., and Shi, Z.: Complex refractive index and single scattering albedo of Icelandic dust in the shortwave part of the spectrum, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7975–8000, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7975-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-7975-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Battaglia, F., Formenti, P., Giorio, C., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Bergé, A., Gratien, A., Pereira, D. L., Bertin, T., de Brito, J. F., Romanias, M. N., Michoud, V., Baldo, C., Chevaillier, S., Noyalet, G., Decorse, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Formation and composition of organic aerosols from the uptake of glyoxal on natural mineral dust aerosols: a laboratory study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12409–12431, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12409-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-12409-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Beeler, P., Donald, S., and Fierce, L.: DDA-BNN v1.0: A Morphology-Aware Surrogate Model for the Optical Properties of Black Carbon–Containing Particles, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1270" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2026-1270</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 27–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U., Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C. S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment: BLACK CARBON IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Caponi, L., Formenti, P., Massabó, D., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Chevaillier, S., Landrot, G., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Piketh, S., Saeed, T., Seibert, D., Williams, E., Balkanski, Y., Prati, P., and Doussin, J.-F.: Spectral- and size-resolved mass absorption efficiency of mineral dust aerosols in the shortwave spectrum: a simulation chamber study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7175–7191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7175-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7175-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S., Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T., Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M., Li, S.-M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman, I., Olfert, J. S., Petäjä, T., Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1223447</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Zhang, X., Russell, L. M., Collier, S., Lee, A. K. Y., Chen, C., Betha, R., Chen, S., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Sanchez, K. J., McMeeking, G. R., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Abbatt, J., and Zhang, Q.: Light Absorption by Ambient Black and Brown Carbon and its Dependence on Black Carbon Coating State for Two California, USA, Cities in Winter and Summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1550–1577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029501</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Chan, T. W., Huang, L., Leaitch, W. R., Sharma, S., Brook, J. R., Slowik, J. G., Abbatt, J. P. D., Brickell, P. C., Liggio, J., Li, S.-M., and Moosmüller, H.: Observations of OM/OC and specific attenuation coefficients (SAC) in ambient fine PM at a rural site in central Ontario, Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2393–2411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2393-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2393-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Chen, G., Liu, C., Wang, J., Yin, Y., and Wang, Y.: Accounting for Black Carbon Mixing State, Nonsphericity, and Heterogeneity Effects in Its Optical Property Parameterization in a Climate Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd041135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024jd041135</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Z., Atwi ,K., Onyima ,T., and Saleh, R.: Investigating the dependence of light-absorption properties of combustion carbonaceous aerosols on combustion conditions, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 53, 419–434, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566593" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1566593</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Colbeck, I., Appleby, L., Hardman, E. J., and Harrison, R. M.: The optical properties and morphology of cloud-processed carbonaceous smoke, J. Aerosol Sci., 21, 527–538, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(90)90129-L" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(90)90129-L</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Corbin, J. C., Modini, R. L., and Gysel-Beer, M.: Mechanisms of soot-aggregate restructuring and compaction, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 57, 89–111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2022.2137385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2022.2137385</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>De Haan, D. O., Hawkins, L. N., Wickremasinghe, P. D., Andretta, A. D., Dignum, J. R., De Haan, A. C., Welsh, H. G., Pennington, E. A., Cui, T., Surratt, J. D., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Brown Carbon from Photo-Oxidation of Glyoxal and SO<sub>2</sub> in Aqueous Aerosol, ACS Earth Space Chem., 7, 1131–1140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00035</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Denjean, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., Pangui, E., Zapf, P., Katrib, Y., Giorio, C., Tapparo, A., Monod, A., Temime-Roussel, B., Decorse, P., Mangeney, C., and Doussin, J. F.: Relating hygroscopicity and optical properties to chemical composition and structure of secondary organic aerosol particles generated from the ozonolysis of α-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3339–3358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3339-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3339-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Balkanski, Y., Caponi, L., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Journet, E., Nowak, S., Caquineau, S., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Saeed, T., Piketh, S., Seibert, D., Williams, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Global scale variability of the mineral dust long-wave refractive index: a new dataset of in situ measurements for climate modeling and remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1901–1929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1901-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1901-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Balkanski, Y., Caponi, L., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Journet, E., Nowak, S., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Saeed, T., Piketh, S., Seibert, D., Williams, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Complex refractive indices and single-scattering albedo of global dust aerosols in the shortwave spectrum and relationship to size and iron content, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15503–15531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15503-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-15503-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Di Biagio, C., Doussin, J.-F., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Cuesta, J., Sellitto, P., Ródenas, M., and Formenti, P.: Infrared optical signature reveals the source–dependency and along–transport evolution of dust mineralogy as shown by laboratory study, Sci. Rep., 13, 13252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39336-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-023-39336-7</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Doussin, J.-F., Fuchs, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Seakins, P., and Wenger, J. (Eds.): A Practical Guide to Atmospheric Simulation Chambers, Springer International Publishing, Cham, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22277-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-031-22277-1</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Ess, M. N., Bertò, M., Irwin, M., Modini, R. L., Gysel-Beer, M., and Vasilatou, K.: Optical and morphological properties of soot particles generated by the miniCAST 5201 BC generator, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 55, 828–847, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2021.1901847" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2021.1901847</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Fierce, L., Bond, T. C., Bauer, S. E., Mena, F., and Riemer, N.: Black carbon absorption at the global scale is affected by particle-scale diversity in composition, Nat. Commun., 7, 12361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12361" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms12361</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Fierce, L., Onasch, T. B., Cappa, C. D., Mazzoleni, C., China, S., Bhandari, J., Davidovits, P., Fischer, D. A., Helgestad, T., Lambe, A. T., Sedlacek, A. J., Smith, G. D., and Wolff, L.: Radiative absorption enhancements by black carbon controlled by particle-to-particle heterogeneity in composition, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 5196–5203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919723117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1919723117</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Fierce, L., Li, Y., Feng, Y., Riemer, N., Schutgens, N. A. J., Aiken, A. C., Dubey, M. K., Ma, P., and Wuebbles, D.: Constraining Black Carbon Aging in Global Models to Reflect Timescales for Internal Mixing, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ms004471" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024ms004471</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Fuller, K. A., Malm, W. C., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Effects of mixing on extinction by carbonaceous particles, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15941–15954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998JD100069</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Is the gas‐particle partitioning in alpha-pinene secondary organic aerosol reversible?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 2007GL029987, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029987</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Habib, Z. G. and Vervisch, P.: On The Refractive Index of Soot at Flame Temperature, Combust. Sci. Technol., 59, 261–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208808947100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00102208808947100</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Han, C., Liu, Y., Ma, J., and He, H.: Key role of organic carbon in the sunlight-enhanced atmospheric aging of soot by O<sub>2</sub>, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 21250–21255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212690110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1212690110</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Haywood, J. M. and Shine, K. P.: The effect of anthropogenic sulfate and soot aerosol on the clear sky planetary radiation budget, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 603–606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GL00075</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Healy, R. M., Wang, J. M., Jeong, C.-H., Lee, A. K. Y., Willis, M. D., Jaroudi, E., Zimmerman, N., Hilker, N., Murphy, M., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Abbatt, J. P. D., Wenger, J. C., and Evans, G. J.: Light‐absorbing properties of ambient black carbon and brown carbon from fossil fuel and biomass burning sources, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 6619–6633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023382" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023382</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Yon, J., Cazaunau, M., Bergé, A., Pangui, E., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Inomata, S., Yu, C., Bernardoni, V., Chevaillier, S., Ferry, D., Laj, P., Maillé, M., Massabò, D., Mazzei, F., Noyalet, G., Tanimoto, H., Temime-Roussel, B., Vecchi, R., Vernocchi, V., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Spectral optical properties of soot: laboratory investigation of propane flame particles and their link to composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6407–6428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6407-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-6407-2025</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + sulfuric acid + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-03 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/76FN-TA55" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/76FN-TA55</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.:  Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + sulfuric acid + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-04 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/PWHP-ED62" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/PWHP-ED62</ext-link>, 2025c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.:  Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + sulfuric acid + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-09 (Version 1.3), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/A18P-JF85" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/A18P-JF85</ext-link>, 2025d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.:  Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + alpha-pinene + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-18 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/AK6B-ZA08" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/AK6B-ZA08</ext-link>, 2026e.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + alpha-pinene + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-20 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/N7S0-S115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/N7S0-S115</ext-link>, 2025f.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + alpha-pinene + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-26 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/BGRM-3554" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/BGRM-3554</ext-link>, 2025g.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-02-23 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/8KVR-AA70" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/8KVR-AA70</ext-link>, 2025h.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-02-24 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/M24W-V933" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/M24W-V933</ext-link>, 2025i.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-17 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/2QRB-4E45" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/2QRB-4E45</ext-link>, 2025j.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-19 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/8HT1-WA13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/8HT1-WA13</ext-link>, 2025k.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-02-26 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/WN6E-0272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/WN6E-0272</ext-link>, 2025l.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-01 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/EAQE-VX80" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/EAQE-VX80</ext-link>, 2025m.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-02 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/JRAC-4W36" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/JRAC-4W36</ext-link>, 2025n.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Yu, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F. (2025). Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2022-12-12 (Version 1.0), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/2BD3-Q151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/2BD3-Q151</ext-link>, 2025o.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Yu, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2022-12-14 (Version 1.0), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/9G66-MG61" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/9G66-MG61</ext-link>, 2025p.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Yu, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2022-12-15 (Version 1.0), AERIS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/XJKP-JD08" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/XJKP-JD08</ext-link>, 2025q.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X.-F., Peng, Y., Wei, J., Peng, J., Lin, X.-Y., Tang, M.-X., Cheng, Y., Men, Z., Fang, T., Zhang, J., He, L.-Y., Cao, L.-M., Liu, C., Zhang, C., Mao, H., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wang, Y.: Microphysical complexity of black carbon particles restricts their warming potential, One Earth, 7, 136–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.004</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Ed.): Short-lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 817–922, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.008</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Jordan, A., Haidacher, S., Hanel, G., Hartungen, E., Märk, L., Seehauser, H., Schottkowsky, R., Sulzer, P., and Märk, T. D.: A high resolution and high sensitivity proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-TOF-MS), Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 286, 122–128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2009.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2009.07.005</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Kahnert, M. and Devasthale, A.: Black carbon fractal morphology and short-wave radiative impact: a modelling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11745–11759, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11745-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11745-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Kamm, S., Möhler, O., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., and Schurath, U.: The Heterogeneous Reaction of Ozone with Soot Aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4651–4661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00235-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00235-6</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Kasper, G.: Dynamics and Measurement of Smokes. I Size Characterization of Nonspherical Particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 1, 187–199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828208958587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786828208958587</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Kebabian, P. L., Robinson, W. A., and Freedman, A.: Optical extinction monitor using cw cavity enhanced detection, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 78, 063102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2744223" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.2744223</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Khalizov, A. F., Xue, H., Wang, L., Zheng, J., and Zhang, R.: Enhanced Light Absorption and Scattering by Carbon Soot Aerosol Internally Mixed with Sulfuric Acid, J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 1066–1074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807531n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp807531n</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Khalizov, A. F., Zhang, R., Zhang, D., Xue, H., Pagels, J., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation of highly hygroscopic soot aerosols upon internal mixing with sulfuric acid vapor, J. Geophys. Res., 114, 2008JD010595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010595</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Kim, H., Barkey, B., and Paulson, S. E.: Real refractive indices of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and toluene secondary organic aerosols generated from ozonolysis and photo-oxidation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014549" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014549</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Cappa, C. D., Cross, E. S., Massoli, P., Ahern, A. T., Davidovits, P., and Onasch, T. B.: Absorption Enhancement of Coated Absorbing Aerosols: Validation of the Photo-Acoustic Technique for Measuring the Enhancement, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43, 1006–1012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903117932" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820903117932</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Lamkaddam, H., Gratien, A., Pangui, E., Cazaunau, M., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: High-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> Photooxidation of n-Dodecane: Temperature Dependence of SOA Formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 192–201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03821" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03821</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty, S. J., Freeman, S., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J., Gettelman, A., De León, R. R., Lim, L. L., Lund, M. T., Millar, R. J., Owen, B., Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Prather, M. J., Sausen, R., and Wilcox, L. J.: The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Lefevre, G., Yon, J., Bouvier, M., Liu, F., and Coppalle, A.: Impact of Organic Coating on Soot Angular and Spectral Scattering Properties, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 6383–6391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05482" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b05482</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Young, D. E., Coe, H., Beddows, D., Fleming, Z. L., Flynn, M. J., Gallagher, M. W., Harrison, R. M., Lee, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Taylor, J. W., Yin, J., Williams, P. I., and Zotter, P.: Size distribution, mixing state and source apportionment of black carbon aerosol in London during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10061–10084, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2901</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Liu, D., He, C., Schwarz, J. P., and Wang, X.: Lifecycle of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols in the atmosphere, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 3, 40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00145-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-020-00145-8</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Liu, F., Yon, J., and Bescond, A.: On the radiative properties of soot aggregates – Part 2: Effects of coating, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 172, 134–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.08.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.08.005</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K., Dubey, M. K., Cappa, C. D., Williams, L. R., Herndon, S. C., Massoli, P., Fortner, E. C., Chhabra, P. S., Brooks, W. A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., China, S., Sharma, N., Mazzoleni, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Lee, J. D., Fleming, Z. L., Mohr, C., Zotter, P., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Enhanced light absorption by mixed source black and brown carbon particles in UK winter, Nat. Commun., 6, 8435, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms9435</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Maricq, M. M. and Xu, N.: The effective density and fractal dimension of soot particles from premixed flames and motor vehicle exhaust, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 1251–1274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.05.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.05.002</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Massabò, D., Bernardoni, V., Bove, M. C., Brunengo, A., Cuccia, E., Piazzalunga, A., Prati, P., Valli, G., and Vecchi, R.: A multi-wavelength optical set-up for the characterization of carbonaceous particulate matter, J. Aerosol Sci., 60, 34–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.02.006</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Murphy, D. M., Lack, D. A., Baynard, T., Brock, C. A., and Lovejoy, E. R.: Uncertainty in Light Scattering Measurements by TSI Nephelometer: Results from Laboratory Studies and Implications for Ambient Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43, 1064–1074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903156542" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820903156542</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Hills, F. B., and Freedman, A.: Aerosol Light Extinction Measurements by Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift (CAPS) Spectroscopy: Laboratory Validation and Field Deployment of a Compact Aerosol Particle Extinction Monitor, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44, 428–435, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003716599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786821003716599</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>McMeeking, G. R., Fortner, E., Onasch, T. B., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M., Coe, H., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Impacts of nonrefractory material on light absorption by aerosols emitted from biomass burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 12272–12286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021750" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021750</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Metcalf, A. R., Loza, C. L., Coggon, M. M., Craven, J. S., Jonsson, H. H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary Organic Aerosol Coating Formation and Evaporation: Chamber Studies Using Black Carbon Seed Aerosol and the Single-Particle Soot Photometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 47, 326–347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.750712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.750712</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Moore, R. H., Ziemba, L. D., Dutcher, D., Beyersdorf, A. J., Chan, K., Crumeyrolle, S., Raymond, T. M., Thornhill, K. L., Winstead, E. L., and Anderson, B. E.: Mapping the Operation of the Miniature Combustion Aerosol Standard (Mini-CAST) Soot Generator, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48, 467–479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.890694" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.890694</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Moosmüller, H. and Ogren, J. A.: Parameterization of the Aerosol Upscatter Fraction as Function of the Backscatter Fraction and Their Relationships to the Asymmetry Parameter for Radiative Transfer Calculations, Atmosphere, 8, 133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8080133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos8080133</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Hills, F. B., Bacon, F. W., and Freedman, A.: Single Scattering Albedo Monitor for Airborne Particulates, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49, 267–279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1022248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2015.1022248</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Park, K., Cao, F., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Relationship between Particle Mass and Mobility for Diesel Exhaust Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 577–583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es025960v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es025960v</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D. R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1602310113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Schloesser, H., Sheridan, P. J., Arnott, W. P., Ogren, J. A., and Virkkula, A.: Evaluation of Multiangle Absorption Photometry for Measuring Aerosol Light Absorption, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 39, 40–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901945" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290901945</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Romshoo, B., Müller, T., Ahlawat, A., Wiedensohler, A., Haneef, M. V., Imran, M., Warsi, A. B., Mandariya, A. K., Habib, G., and Pöhlker, M. L.: Significant contribution of fractal morphology to aerosol light absorption in polluted environments dominated by black carbon (BC), npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 87, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00634-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-024-00634-0</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Saffaripour, M., Tay, L.-L., Thomson, K. A., Smallwood, G. J., Brem, B. T., Durdina, L., and Johnson, M.: Raman spectroscopy and TEM characterization of solid particulate matter emitted from soot generators and aircraft turbine engines, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 51, 518–531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1274368" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2016.1274368</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Sand, M., Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Gliß, J., Bauer, S. E., Bian, H., Chin, M., Checa-Garcia, R., Ginoux, P., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Matsui, H., van Noije, T., Olivié, D. J. L., Remy, S., Schulz, M., Stier, P., Stjern, C. W., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., Tsyro, S. G., and Watson-Parris, D.: Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15929–15947, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Schnaiter, M., Linke, C., Möhler, O., Naumann, K. ‐H., Saathoff, H., Wagner, R., Schurath, U., and Wehner, B.: Absorption amplification of black carbon internally mixed with secondary organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 110, 2005JD006046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006046</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G. L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B., Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O., Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light‐scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, 2006JD007076, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007076</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Sedlacek III, A. J., Lewis, E. R., Kleinman, L., Xu, J., and Zhang, Q.: Determination of and evidence for non-core-shell structure of particles containing black carbon using the Single-Particle Soot Photometer (SP2), Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050905" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL050905</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Sorensen, C. M.: The Mobility of Fractal Aggregates: A Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 765–779, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560909" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.560909</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Stephens, M., Turner, N., and Sandberg, J.: Particle identification by laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity, Appl. Optics, 42,  3726–3736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.42.003726</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Sumlin B. J., Heinson W. R., and Chakrabarty R. K.: Retrieving the Aerosol Complex Refractive Index using PyMieScatt: A Mie Computational Package with Visualization Capabilities, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 205, 127–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.10.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.10.012</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, J. W., Wu, H., Szpek, K., Bower, K., Crawford, I., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Davies, N. W., Haywood, J. M., and Coe, H.: Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11201–11221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Vecchi, R., Bernardoni, V., Paganelli, C., and Valli, G.: A filter-based light-absorption measurement with polar photometer: Effects of sampling artefacts from organic carbon, J. Aerosol Sci. 70, 15–25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.12.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.12.012</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Doussin, J. F., Perrier, S., Perraudin, E., Katrib, Y., Pangui, E., and Picquet-Varrault, B.: Design of a new multi-phase experimental simulation chamber for atmospheric photosmog, aerosol and cloud chemistry research, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2465–2494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2465-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-2465-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Wang, J., Cai, R., Liu, C., Jiang, J., Nie, W., Wang, J., Moteki, N., Zaveri, R. A., Huang, X., Ma, N., Chen, G., Wang, Z., Jin, Y., Cai, J., Zhang, Y., Chi, X., Holanda, B. A., Xing, J., Liu, T., Qi, X., Wang, Q., Pöhlker, C., Su, H., Cheng, Y., Wang, S., Hao, J., Andreae, M. O., and Ding, A.: Unified theoretical framework for black carbon mixing state allows greater accuracy of climate effect estimation, Nat. Commun., 14, 2703, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38330-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-38330-x</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Liu, F., He, C., Bi, L., Cheng, T., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, X., Shi, Z., and Li, W.: Fractal Dimensions and Mixing Structures of Soot Particles during Atmospheric Processing, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 487–493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Cheng, T., Pan, X., Zheng, L., Shi, S., and Liu, H.: The role of biomass burning states in light absorption enhancement of carbonaceous aerosols, Sci. Rep., 10, 12829, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69611-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-69611-w</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Yon, J., Bescond, A., and Ouf, F.-X.: A simple semi-empirical model for effective density measurements of fractal aggregates, J. Aerosol Sci., 87, 28–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.05.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.05.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Yu, C., Pangui, E., Tu, K., Cazaunau, M., Feingesicht, M., Xavier, L., Bourrianne, T., Michoud, V., Cantrell, C., Onasch, T. B., Freedman, A., and Formenti, P.: Characterisation of particle single-scattering albedo with a modified airborne dual-wavelength CAPS monitor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3419–3437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3419-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-3419-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Zanatta, M., Bogert, P., Ginot, P., Gong, Y., Hoshyaripour, G. A., Hu, Y., Jiang, F., Laj, P., Li, Y., Linke, C., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Umo, N. S., Vogel, F., and Wagner, R.: AIDA Arctic transport experiment – Part 1: Simulation of northward transport and aging effect on fundamental black carbon properties, Aerosol Research, 3, 477–502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-477-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ar-3-477-2025</ext-link>, 2025. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Zelenay, V., Monge, M. E., D'Anna, B., George, C., Styler, S. A., Huthwelker, T., and Ammann, M.: Increased steady state uptake of ozone on soot due to UV/Vis radiation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015500</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Zeng, L., Tan, T., Zhao, G., Du, Z., Hu, S., Shang, D., and Hu, M.: Overestimation of black carbon light absorption due to mixing state heterogeneity, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00535-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-023-00535-8</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Khalizov, A. F., Pagels, J., Zhang, D., Xue, H., and McMurry, P. H.: Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 10291–10296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804860105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0804860105</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Mao, M., Yin, Y., and Wang, B.: Absorption enhancement of aged black carbon aerosols affected by their microphysics: A numerical investigation, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 202, 90–97, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.07.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.07.025</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Favez, O., Canonaco, F., Liu, D., Močnik, G., Amodeo, T., Sciare, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Gros, V., and Albinet, A.: Evidence of major secondary organic aerosol contribution to lensing effect black carbon absorption enhancement, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0056-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0056-2</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Su, H., Kecorius, S., Ma, N., Wang, Z., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Pöschl, U., Wiedensohler, A., Andreae, M. O., and Cheng, Y.: Extremely low-volatility organic coating leads to underestimation of black carbon climate impact, One Earth, 6, 158–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.01.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.oneear.2023.01.009</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Xu, L., Zheng, Z., Ching, J., Zhu, S., Liu, D., and Li, W.: Absorption enhancement and shielding effect of brown organic coating on black carbon aerosols, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00989-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-025-00989-y</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The synergy of morphology and mixing state on the absorption of coated black carbon soot</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adachi, K., Chung, S. H., and Buseck, P. R.: Shapes of soot aerosol particles and implications for their effects on climate, J. Geophys. Res., 115, 2009JD012868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Marshall, S. F., Laucks, M. L., Charlson, R. J., Waggoner, A. P., Ogren, J. A., Caldow, R., Holm, R. L., Quant, F. R., Sem, G. J., Wiedensohler, A., Ahlquist, N. A., and Bates, T. S.: Performance Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 967–986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0967:PCOAHS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0967:PCOAHS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Asmi, E., Sipkens, T. A., Saturno, J., Backman, J., Vasilatou, K., Weingartner, E., Keller, A., Ciupek, K., Müller, T., Babu Suja, A., Močnik, G., Drinovec, L., Eleftheriadis, K., Gini, M. I., Nowak, A., and Corbin, J. C.: Mass absorption cross-section of ambient black carbon aerosols – a review, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 9, 17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01288-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01288-2</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baldo, C., Formenti, P., Nowak, S., Chevaillier, S., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Di Biagio, C., Doussin, J.-F., Ignatyev, K., Dagsson-Waldhauserova, P., Arnalds, O., MacKenzie, A. R., and Shi, Z.: Distinct chemical and mineralogical composition of Icelandic dust compared to northern African and Asian dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13521–13539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13521-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13521-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baldo, C., Formenti, P., Di Biagio, C., Lu, G., Song, C., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Doussin, J.-F., Dagsson-Waldhauserova, P., Arnalds, O., Beddows, D., MacKenzie, A. R., and Shi, Z.: Complex refractive index and single scattering albedo of Icelandic dust in the shortwave part of the spectrum, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7975–8000, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7975-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7975-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Battaglia, F., Formenti, P., Giorio, C., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Bergé, A., Gratien, A., Pereira, D. L., Bertin, T., de Brito, J. F., Romanias, M. N., Michoud, V., Baldo, C., Chevaillier, S., Noyalet, G., Decorse, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Formation and composition of organic aerosols from the uptake of glyoxal on natural mineral dust aerosols: a laboratory study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12409–12431, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12409-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12409-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beeler, P., Donald, S., and Fierce, L.: DDA-BNN v1.0: A Morphology-Aware Surrogate Model for the Optical Properties of Black Carbon–Containing Particles, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1270" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1270</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 27–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U., Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C. S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment: BLACK CARBON IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Caponi, L., Formenti, P., Massabó, D., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Chevaillier, S., Landrot, G., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Piketh, S., Saeed, T., Seibert, D., Williams, E., Balkanski, Y., Prati, P., and Doussin, J.-F.: Spectral- and size-resolved mass absorption efficiency of mineral dust aerosols in the shortwave spectrum: a simulation chamber study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7175–7191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7175-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7175-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S., Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T., Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M., Li, S.-M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman, I., Olfert, J. S., Petäjä, T., Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cappa, C. D., Zhang, X., Russell, L. M., Collier, S., Lee, A. K. Y., Chen, C., Betha, R., Chen, S., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Sanchez, K. J., McMeeking, G. R., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Abbatt, J., and Zhang, Q.: Light Absorption by Ambient Black and Brown Carbon and its Dependence on Black Carbon Coating State for Two California, USA, Cities in Winter and Summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1550–1577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029501</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chan, T. W., Huang, L., Leaitch, W. R., Sharma, S., Brook, J. R., Slowik, J. G., Abbatt, J. P. D., Brickell, P. C., Liggio, J., Li, S.-M., and Moosmüller, H.: Observations of OM/OC and specific attenuation coefficients (SAC) in ambient fine PM at a rural site in central Ontario, Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2393–2411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2393-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2393-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, G., Liu, C., Wang, J., Yin, Y., and Wang, Y.: Accounting for Black Carbon Mixing State, Nonsphericity, and Heterogeneity Effects in Its Optical Property Parameterization in a Climate Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd041135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd041135</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Z., Atwi ,K., Onyima ,T., and Saleh, R.: Investigating the dependence of light-absorption properties of combustion carbonaceous aerosols on combustion conditions, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 53, 419–434, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566593" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566593</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Colbeck, I., Appleby, L., Hardman, E. J., and Harrison, R. M.: The optical properties and morphology of cloud-processed carbonaceous smoke, J. Aerosol Sci., 21, 527–538, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(90)90129-L" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(90)90129-L</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Corbin, J. C., Modini, R. L., and Gysel-Beer, M.: Mechanisms of soot-aggregate restructuring and compaction, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 57, 89–111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2022.2137385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2022.2137385</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Haan, D. O., Hawkins, L. N., Wickremasinghe, P. D., Andretta, A. D., Dignum, J. R., De Haan, A. C., Welsh, H. G., Pennington, E. A., Cui, T., Surratt, J. D., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Brown Carbon from Photo-Oxidation of Glyoxal and SO<sub>2</sub> in Aqueous Aerosol, ACS Earth Space Chem., 7, 1131–1140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00035</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Denjean, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., Pangui, E., Zapf, P., Katrib, Y., Giorio, C., Tapparo, A., Monod, A., Temime-Roussel, B., Decorse, P., Mangeney, C., and Doussin, J. F.: Relating hygroscopicity and optical properties to chemical composition and structure of secondary organic aerosol particles generated from the ozonolysis of α-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3339–3358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3339-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3339-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Balkanski, Y., Caponi, L., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Journet, E., Nowak, S., Caquineau, S., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Saeed, T., Piketh, S., Seibert, D., Williams, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Global scale variability of the mineral dust long-wave refractive index: a new dataset of in situ measurements for climate modeling and remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1901–1929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1901-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1901-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Balkanski, Y., Caponi, L., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Journet, E., Nowak, S., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Saeed, T., Piketh, S., Seibert, D., Williams, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Complex refractive indices and single-scattering albedo of global dust aerosols in the shortwave spectrum and relationship to size and iron content, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15503–15531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15503-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15503-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Di Biagio, C., Doussin, J.-F., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Cuesta, J., Sellitto, P., Ródenas, M., and Formenti, P.: Infrared optical signature reveals the source–dependency and along–transport evolution of dust mineralogy as shown by laboratory study, Sci. Rep., 13, 13252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39336-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39336-7</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Doussin, J.-F., Fuchs, H., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Seakins, P., and Wenger, J. (Eds.): A Practical Guide to Atmospheric Simulation Chambers, Springer International Publishing, Cham, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22277-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22277-1</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ess, M. N., Bertò, M., Irwin, M., Modini, R. L., Gysel-Beer, M., and Vasilatou, K.: Optical and morphological properties of soot particles generated by the miniCAST 5201 BC generator, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 55, 828–847, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2021.1901847" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2021.1901847</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fierce, L., Bond, T. C., Bauer, S. E., Mena, F., and Riemer, N.: Black carbon absorption at the global scale is affected by particle-scale diversity in composition, Nat. Commun., 7, 12361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12361" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12361</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fierce, L., Onasch, T. B., Cappa, C. D., Mazzoleni, C., China, S., Bhandari, J., Davidovits, P., Fischer, D. A., Helgestad, T., Lambe, A. T., Sedlacek, A. J., Smith, G. D., and Wolff, L.: Radiative absorption enhancements by black carbon controlled by particle-to-particle heterogeneity in composition, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 5196–5203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919723117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919723117</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fierce, L., Li, Y., Feng, Y., Riemer, N., Schutgens, N. A. J., Aiken, A. C., Dubey, M. K., Ma, P., and Wuebbles, D.: Constraining Black Carbon Aging in Global Models to Reflect Timescales for Internal Mixing, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ms004471" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ms004471</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fuller, K. A., Malm, W. C., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Effects of mixing on extinction by carbonaceous particles, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15941–15954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100069</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grieshop, A. P., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Is the gas‐particle partitioning in alpha-pinene secondary organic aerosol reversible?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 2007GL029987, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029987</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Habib, Z. G. and Vervisch, P.: On The Refractive Index of Soot at Flame Temperature, Combust. Sci. Technol., 59, 261–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208808947100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208808947100</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, C., Liu, Y., Ma, J., and He, H.: Key role of organic carbon in the sunlight-enhanced atmospheric aging of soot by O<sub>2</sub>, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 21250–21255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212690110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212690110</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haywood, J. M. and Shine, K. P.: The effect of anthropogenic sulfate and soot aerosol on the clear sky planetary radiation budget, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 603–606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00075" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00075</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Healy, R. M., Wang, J. M., Jeong, C.-H., Lee, A. K. Y., Willis, M. D., Jaroudi, E., Zimmerman, N., Hilker, N., Murphy, M., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Abbatt, J. P. D., Wenger, J. C., and Evans, G. J.: Light‐absorbing properties of ambient black carbon and brown carbon from fossil fuel and biomass burning sources, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 6619–6633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023382" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023382</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Yon, J., Cazaunau, M., Bergé, A., Pangui, E., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Inomata, S., Yu, C., Bernardoni, V., Chevaillier, S., Ferry, D., Laj, P., Maillé, M., Massabò, D., Mazzei, F., Noyalet, G., Tanimoto, H., Temime-Roussel, B., Vecchi, R., Vernocchi, V., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Spectral optical properties of soot: laboratory investigation of propane flame particles and their link to composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6407–6428, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6407-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6407-2025</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + sulfuric acid + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-03 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/76FN-TA55" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/76FN-TA55</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.:  Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + sulfuric acid + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-04 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/PWHP-ED62" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/PWHP-ED62</a>, 2025c.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.:  Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + sulfuric acid + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-09 (Version 1.3), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/A18P-JF85" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/A18P-JF85</a>, 2025d.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.:  Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + alpha-pinene + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-18 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/AK6B-ZA08" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/AK6B-ZA08</a>, 2026e.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + alpha-pinene + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-20 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/N7S0-S115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/N7S0-S115</a>, 2025f.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + alpha-pinene + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-26 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/BGRM-3554" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/BGRM-3554</a>, 2025g.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-02-23 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/8KVR-AA70" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/8KVR-AA70</a>, 2025h.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-02-24 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/M24W-V933" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/M24W-V933</a>, 2025i.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-17 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/2QRB-4E45" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/2QRB-4E45</a>, 2025j.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-05-19 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/8HT1-WA13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/8HT1-WA13</a>, 2025k.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-02-26 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/WN6E-0272" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/WN6E-0272</a>, 2025l.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + None - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-01 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/EAQE-VX80" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/EAQE-VX80</a>, 2025m.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Renzi, L., Marinoni, A., Laj, P., Temime-Roussel, B., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2021-03-02 (Version 1.1), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/JRAC-4W36" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/JRAC-4W36</a>, 2025n.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Yu, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F. (2025). Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2022-12-12 (Version 1.0), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/2BD3-Q151" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/2BD3-Q151</a>, 2025o.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Yu, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2022-12-14 (Version 1.0), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/9G66-MG61" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/9G66-MG61</a>, 2025p.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heuser, J., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Berge, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Yu, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: Atmospheric simulation chamber study: Soot + O3 - Aerosol study - optical properties - 2022-12-15 (Version 1.0), AERIS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/XJKP-JD08" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/XJKP-JD08</a>, 2025q.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, X.-F., Peng, Y., Wei, J., Peng, J., Lin, X.-Y., Tang, M.-X., Cheng, Y., Men, Z., Fang, T., Zhang, J., He, L.-Y., Cao, L.-M., Liu, C., Zhang, C., Mao, H., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wang, Y.: Microphysical complexity of black carbon particles restricts their warming potential, One Earth, 7, 136–145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.004</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Ed.): Short-lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 817–922, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jordan, A., Haidacher, S., Hanel, G., Hartungen, E., Märk, L., Seehauser, H., Schottkowsky, R., Sulzer, P.,
and Märk, T. D.: A high resolution and high sensitivity proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass
spectrometer (PTR-TOF-MS), Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 286, 122–128,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2009.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2009.07.005</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kahnert, M. and Devasthale, A.: Black carbon fractal morphology and short-wave radiative impact: a modelling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11745–11759, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11745-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11745-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kamm, S., Möhler, O., Naumann, K. H., Saathoff, H., and Schurath, U.: The Heterogeneous Reaction of Ozone with Soot Aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4651–4661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00235-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00235-6</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kasper, G.: Dynamics and Measurement of Smokes. I Size Characterization of Nonspherical Particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 1, 187–199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828208958587" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828208958587</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kebabian, P. L., Robinson, W. A., and Freedman, A.: Optical extinction monitor using cw cavity enhanced detection, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 78, 063102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2744223" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2744223</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khalizov, A. F., Xue, H., Wang, L., Zheng, J., and Zhang, R.: Enhanced Light Absorption and Scattering by Carbon Soot Aerosol Internally Mixed with Sulfuric Acid, J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 1066–1074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807531n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807531n</a>, 2009a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khalizov, A. F., Zhang, R., Zhang, D., Xue, H., Pagels, J., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation of highly hygroscopic soot aerosols upon internal mixing with sulfuric acid vapor, J. Geophys. Res., 114, 2008JD010595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010595</a>, 2009b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, H., Barkey, B., and Paulson, S. E.: Real refractive indices of <i>α</i>- and <i>β</i>-pinene and toluene secondary organic aerosols generated from ozonolysis and photo-oxidation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014549" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014549</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lack, D. A., Cappa, C. D., Cross, E. S., Massoli, P., Ahern, A. T., Davidovits, P., and Onasch, T. B.: Absorption Enhancement of Coated Absorbing Aerosols: Validation of the Photo-Acoustic Technique for Measuring the Enhancement, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43, 1006–1012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903117932" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903117932</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lamkaddam, H., Gratien, A., Pangui, E., Cazaunau, M., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.: High-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Photooxidation of n-Dodecane: Temperature Dependence of SOA Formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 192–201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03821" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03821</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty, S. J., Freeman, S., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J., Gettelman, A., De León, R. R., Lim, L. L., Lund, M. T., Millar, R. J., Owen, B., Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Prather, M. J., Sausen, R., and Wilcox, L. J.: The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lefevre, G., Yon, J., Bouvier, M., Liu, F., and Coppalle, A.: Impact of Organic Coating on Soot Angular and Spectral Scattering Properties, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 6383–6391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05482" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05482</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Young, D. E., Coe, H., Beddows, D., Fleming, Z. L., Flynn, M. J., Gallagher, M. W., Harrison, R. M., Lee, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Taylor, J. W., Yin, J., Williams, P. I., and Zotter, P.: Size distribution, mixing state and source apportionment of black carbon aerosol in London during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10061–10084, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10061-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, D., He, C., Schwarz, J. P., and Wang, X.: Lifecycle of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols in the atmosphere, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 3, 40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00145-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00145-8</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, F., Yon, J., and Bescond, A.: On the radiative properties of soot aggregates – Part 2: Effects of coating, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 172, 134–145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.08.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.08.005</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, S., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K., Dubey, M. K., Cappa, C. D., Williams, L. R., Herndon, S. C., Massoli, P., Fortner, E. C., Chhabra, P. S., Brooks, W. A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., China, S., Sharma, N., Mazzoleni, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Lee, J. D., Fleming, Z. L., Mohr, C., Zotter, P., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Enhanced light absorption by mixed source black and brown carbon particles in UK winter, Nat. Commun., 6, 8435, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Maricq, M. M. and Xu, N.: The effective density and fractal dimension of soot particles from premixed flames and motor vehicle exhaust, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 1251–1274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.05.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.05.002</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Massabò, D., Bernardoni, V., Bove, M. C., Brunengo, A., Cuccia, E., Piazzalunga, A., Prati, P., Valli, G., and Vecchi, R.: A multi-wavelength optical set-up for the characterization of carbonaceous particulate matter, J. Aerosol Sci., 60, 34–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.02.006</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Massoli, P., Murphy, D. M., Lack, D. A., Baynard, T., Brock, C. A., and Lovejoy, E. R.: Uncertainty in Light Scattering Measurements by TSI Nephelometer: Results from Laboratory Studies and Implications for Ambient Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43, 1064–1074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903156542" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903156542</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Onasch, T. B., Hills, F. B., and Freedman, A.: Aerosol Light Extinction Measurements by Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift (CAPS) Spectroscopy: Laboratory Validation and Field Deployment of a Compact Aerosol Particle Extinction Monitor, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44, 428–435, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003716599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003716599</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
McMeeking, G. R., Fortner, E., Onasch, T. B., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M., Coe, H., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Impacts of nonrefractory material on light absorption by aerosols emitted from biomass burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 12272–12286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021750" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021750</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Metcalf, A. R., Loza, C. L., Coggon, M. M., Craven, J. S., Jonsson, H. H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary Organic Aerosol Coating Formation and Evaporation: Chamber Studies Using Black Carbon Seed Aerosol and the Single-Particle Soot Photometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 47, 326–347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.750712" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.750712</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moore, R. H., Ziemba, L. D., Dutcher, D., Beyersdorf, A. J., Chan, K., Crumeyrolle, S., Raymond, T. M., Thornhill, K. L., Winstead, E. L., and Anderson, B. E.: Mapping the Operation of the Miniature Combustion Aerosol Standard (Mini-CAST) Soot Generator, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48, 467–479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.890694" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.890694</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moosmüller, H. and Ogren, J. A.: Parameterization of the Aerosol Upscatter Fraction as Function of the Backscatter Fraction and Their Relationships to the Asymmetry Parameter for Radiative Transfer Calculations, Atmosphere, 8, 133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8080133" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8080133</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Kebabian, P. L., Hills, F. B., Bacon, F. W., and Freedman, A.: Single Scattering Albedo Monitor for Airborne Particulates, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49, 267–279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1022248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1022248</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Park, K., Cao, F., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Relationship between Particle Mass and Mobility for Diesel Exhaust Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 577–583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es025960v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es025960v</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D. R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petzold, A., Schloesser, H., Sheridan, P. J., Arnott, W. P., Ogren, J. A., and Virkkula, A.: Evaluation of Multiangle Absorption Photometry for Measuring Aerosol Light Absorption, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 39, 40–51, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901945" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901945</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Romshoo, B., Müller, T., Ahlawat, A., Wiedensohler, A., Haneef, M. V., Imran, M., Warsi, A. B., Mandariya, A. K., Habib, G., and Pöhlker, M. L.: Significant contribution of fractal morphology to aerosol light absorption in polluted environments dominated by black carbon (BC), npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 87, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00634-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00634-0</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saffaripour, M., Tay, L.-L., Thomson, K. A., Smallwood, G. J., Brem, B. T., Durdina, L., and Johnson, M.: Raman spectroscopy and TEM characterization of solid particulate matter emitted from soot generators and aircraft turbine engines, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 51, 518–531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1274368" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1274368</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sand, M., Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Gliß, J., Bauer, S. E., Bian, H., Chin, M., Checa-Garcia, R., Ginoux, P., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Matsui, H., van Noije, T., Olivié, D. J. L., Remy, S., Schulz, M., Stier, P., Stjern, C. W., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., Tsyro, S. G., and Watson-Parris, D.: Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15929–15947, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schnaiter, M., Linke, C., Möhler, O., Naumann, K. ‐H., Saathoff, H., Wagner, R., Schurath, U., and Wehner, B.: Absorption amplification of black carbon internally mixed with secondary organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 110, 2005JD006046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006046</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G. L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B., Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O., Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light‐scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, 2006JD007076, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sedlacek III, A. J., Lewis, E. R., Kleinman, L., Xu, J., and Zhang, Q.: Determination of and evidence for non-core-shell structure of particles containing black carbon using the Single-Particle Soot Photometer (SP2), Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050905" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050905</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sorensen, C. M.: The Mobility of Fractal Aggregates: A Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 765–779, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560909" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.560909</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stephens, M., Turner, N., and Sandberg, J.: Particle identification by laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity, Appl. Optics, 42,  3726–3736, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003726</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sumlin B. J., Heinson W. R., and Chakrabarty R. K.: Retrieving the Aerosol Complex Refractive Index using PyMieScatt: A Mie Computational Package with Visualization Capabilities, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 205, 127–134,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.10.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.10.012</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
      
Taylor, J. W., Wu, H., Szpek, K., Bower, K., Crawford, I., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Davies, N. W., Haywood, J. M., and Coe, H.: Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11201–11221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vecchi, R., Bernardoni, V., Paganelli, C., and Valli, G.: A filter-based light-absorption measurement with polar photometer: Effects of sampling artefacts from organic carbon, J. Aerosol Sci. 70, 15–25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.12.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.12.012</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, J., Doussin, J. F., Perrier, S., Perraudin, E., Katrib, Y., Pangui, E., and Picquet-Varrault, B.: Design of a new multi-phase experimental simulation chamber for atmospheric photosmog, aerosol and cloud chemistry research, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2465–2494, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2465-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2465-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, J., Wang, J., Cai, R., Liu, C., Jiang, J., Nie, W., Wang, J., Moteki, N., Zaveri, R. A., Huang, X., Ma, N., Chen, G., Wang, Z., Jin, Y., Cai, J., Zhang, Y., Chi, X., Holanda, B. A., Xing, J., Liu, T., Qi, X., Wang, Q., Pöhlker, C., Su, H., Cheng, Y., Wang, S., Hao, J., Andreae, M. O., and Ding, A.: Unified theoretical framework for black carbon mixing state allows greater accuracy of climate effect estimation, Nat. Commun., 14, 2703, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38330-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38330-x</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Liu, F., He, C., Bi, L., Cheng, T., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, X., Shi, Z., and Li, W.: Fractal Dimensions and Mixing Structures of Soot Particles during Atmospheric Processing, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 487–493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, Y., Cheng, T., Pan, X., Zheng, L., Shi, S., and Liu, H.: The role of biomass burning states in light absorption enhancement of carbonaceous aerosols, Sci. Rep., 10, 12829, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69611-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69611-w</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yon, J., Bescond, A., and Ouf, F.-X.: A simple semi-empirical model for effective density measurements of fractal aggregates, J. Aerosol Sci., 87, 28–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.05.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.05.003</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, C., Pangui, E., Tu, K., Cazaunau, M., Feingesicht, M., Xavier, L., Bourrianne, T., Michoud, V., Cantrell, C., Onasch, T. B., Freedman, A., and Formenti, P.: Characterisation of particle single-scattering albedo with a modified airborne dual-wavelength CAPS monitor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3419–3437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3419-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3419-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zanatta, M., Bogert, P., Ginot, P., Gong, Y., Hoshyaripour, G. A., Hu, Y., Jiang, F., Laj, P., Li, Y., Linke, C., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Umo, N. S., Vogel, F., and Wagner, R.: AIDA Arctic transport experiment – Part 1: Simulation of northward transport and aging effect on fundamental black carbon properties, Aerosol Research, 3, 477–502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-477-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-477-2025</a>, 2025.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zelenay, V., Monge, M. E., D'Anna, B., George, C., Styler, S. A., Huthwelker, T., and Ammann, M.: Increased steady state uptake of ozone on soot due to UV/Vis radiation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015500" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015500</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeng, L., Tan, T., Zhao, G., Du, Z., Hu, S., Shang, D., and Hu, M.: Overestimation of black carbon light absorption due to mixing state heterogeneity, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 1–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00535-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00535-8</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, R., Khalizov, A. F., Pagels, J., Zhang, D., Xue, H., and McMurry, P. H.: Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 10291–10296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804860105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804860105</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, X., Mao, M., Yin, Y., and Wang, B.: Absorption enhancement of aged black carbon aerosols affected by their microphysics: A numerical investigation, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 202, 90–97, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.07.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.07.025</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Favez, O., Canonaco, F., Liu, D., Močnik, G., Amodeo, T., Sciare, J., Prévôt, A. S. H., Gros, V., and Albinet, A.: Evidence of major secondary organic aerosol contribution to lensing effect black carbon absorption enhancement, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0056-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0056-2</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Su, H., Kecorius, S., Ma, N., Wang, Z., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Pöschl, U., Wiedensohler, A., Andreae, M. O., and Cheng, Y.: Extremely low-volatility organic coating leads to underestimation of black carbon climate impact, One Earth, 6, 158–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.01.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.01.009</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Xu, L., Zheng, Z., Ching, J., Zhu, S., Liu, D., and Li, W.: Absorption enhancement and shielding effect of brown organic coating on black carbon aerosols, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00989-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00989-y</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
