<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-15653-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Characterisation of hygroscopic aerosol processes using remote sensing and in situ techniques at the MeteoSwiss Payerne station</article-title><alt-title>Hygroscopic aerosol by remote sensing and in situ techniques</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Díaz-Zurita</surname><given-names>Arlett</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8982-7527</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Brunamonti</surname><given-names>Simone</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7667-443X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Haefele</surname><given-names>Alexander</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3912-5316</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Collaud Coen</surname><given-names>Martine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6482-2941</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Martucci</surname><given-names>Giovanni</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Brem</surname><given-names>Benjamin Tobias</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6211-2815</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Gysel-Beer</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7453-1264</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Lyamani</surname><given-names>Hassan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Titos</surname><given-names>Gloria</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-5079</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Pérez-Ramírez</surname><given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7679-6135</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hüglin</surname><given-names>Christoph</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6973-522X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Alados-Arboledas</surname><given-names>Lucas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-7167</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Keller</surname><given-names>Alejandro</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6880-043X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Wienhold</surname><given-names>Frank Gunther</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Hervo</surname><given-names>Maxime</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3614-1297</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Navas-Guzmán</surname><given-names>Francisco</given-names></name>
          <email>fguzman@ugr.es</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0905-4385</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research (IISTA), University of Granada, Granada, 18006, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Applied Physics, University of Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Empa, Laboratory for Air Pollution/Environmental Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>PSI Center for Energy and Environmental Sciences, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Windisch, 5210, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Francisco Navas-Guzmán (fguzman@ugr.es)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>November</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>21</issue>
      <fpage>15653</fpage><lpage>15682</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Arlett Díaz-Zurita et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e255">This study presents a comprehensive assessment of aerosol hygroscopicity during the HYGRO19 field campaign conducted at the MeteoSwiss station in Payerne (Switzerland) from June to December 2019. Continuous profiles of aerosol backscatter, water vapour mixing ratio, and temperature provided by the Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) during both daytime and nighttime allowed aerosol hygroscopic growth to be investigated temporally and vertically under different atmospheric conditions. The campaign also provided a unique experimental framework by combining continuous Raman lidar observations with vertically resolved in situ measurements from the balloon-borne Compact Backscatter Aerosol Detector coupled with Vaisala RS41 radiosondes (COBALD-RS41), ground-based tandem nephelometers, and complementary surface aerosol chemical analyses, enabling aerosol hygroscopicity to be evaluated using three complementary approaches. Two contrasting aerosol regimes were observed: a summer period characterised by relatively high aerosol loading and frequent influence from long-range transported particles, and a second period dominated by low-pressure systems, persistent cloudiness, and reduced aerosol concentrations. Through these different atmospheric conditions, more than 200 well-mixed hygroscopic aerosol layers were identified with RALMO, with median hygroscopicity parameters of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Statistical analyses revealed no systematic dependence of aerosol hygroscopicity on altitude, with comparable values in the atmospheric boundary layer and free troposphere. Multi-instrument comparisons showed generally consistent hygroscopic behaviour among RALMO, COBALD-RS41, and tandem nephelometer observations in the analysed cases, despite differences between the techniques. Surface chemical analyses showed a predominance of organic matter, with inorganic species accounting for approximately 11 % of the aerosol mass. No clear dependence of aerosol hygroscopicity on particle size was identified. These results show that continuous Raman lidar observations, complemented by vertically resolved and ground-based in situ measurements, provide a robust framework for characterising aerosol hygroscopicity under ambient atmospheric conditions.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>European Regional Development Fund</funding-source>
<award-id>PID2021-128008OB-I00</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e317">Atmospheric aerosols have a significant impact on Earth's radiative balance both directly, through the scattering and absorption of solar radiation, and indirectly, by modifying the microphysical properties of clouds due to their ability to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) or ice nucleating particles (INPs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.1"/>. According to the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the largest uncertainty in the net radiative forcing is primarily dominated by uncertainties associated with the aerosol component <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.2"/>. These uncertainties are mainly associated with the high temporal and spatial variability of aerosol distribution and composition, as well as their complex interactions with clouds (aerosol-cloud interactions, ACI) and precipitation processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.3"/>. One of the key aspects contributing to these uncertainties is aerosol hygroscopicity, which refers to the ability of particles to take up water vapour, thereby altering particle size, chemical composition and optical properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.4"/>. Aerosol hygroscopic growth can influence the direct radiative effect by modifying particle size and consequently the light scattering pattern (i.e. the phase function). Moreover, the hygroscopic growth represents a fundamental aerosol parameter leading to indirect radiative effect, as the ability of aerosols to act as CCN is directly related to their affinity for water vapour uptake <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e335">Several studies have addressed the effects of hygroscopic growth on aerosol optical and microphysical properties using ground-based in situ measurements. Techniques such as the Humidified Tandem Differential Mobility Analyser (HT-DMA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx116" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> and Humidified Tandem Nephelometers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx114" id="paren.7"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> have been extensively used to quantify changes in particle diameter or aerosol optical properties due to water vapour uptake. However, these techniques also have certain limitations. Most in situ techniques alter the ambient conditions and are subject to particle losses in the sampling lines, which can modify aerosol properties relative to ambient conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g., particle number concentration, size distribution, chemical composition, scattering, and absorption;</named-content></xref>. For humidified nephelometer measurements, uncertainties in the scattering enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH)) can be substantial at high relative humidity (RH), with values of approximately 20 %–40 % reported for moderately hygroscopic aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.9"/>. However, the most relevant issue is that these measurements are representative of only a few metres above the ground and do not allow for a complete understanding of aerosol hygroscopicity in the vertical.</p>
      <p id="d2e363">Remote sensing techniques can complement observations of aerosol hygroscopicity by providing independent measurements of aerosol properties and relative humidity. Furthermore, these measurements can be obtained at high RH without altering the aerosol sample <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.10"/>. Measurements with ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.11"><named-content content-type="pre">AERONET;</named-content></xref> can estimate aerosol hygroscopicity through studying changes in aerosol size distributions in relation to column precipitable water vapour (PWV) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92" id="paren.12"/>, and also in connection with the dissipation of fog or low-altitude clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.13"/>. However, AERONET measurements are representative of the entire atmospheric column. In contrast, lidar measurements provide vertically resolved aerosol information, which make such measurements suitable for investigating aerosol hygroscopicity within well-mixed aerosol layers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.14"/>. To achieve this, well-mixed atmospheric conditions are required to isolate the effect of hygroscopic growth from other aerosol processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.15"/>. Nevertheless, as these measurements are performed under real atmospheric conditions, neither the sample nor the ambient conditions can be controlled, limiting their applicability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.16"/>, and obtaining RH profiles with high vertical and temporal resolution remains challenging. Furthermore, lidar system quantifies the impact of RH on the backscatter coefficient at a polar angle of 180°, which requires assumptions and calculations to translate it to, for example, the RH effect on the hemispheric backscatter coefficient. Some studies relied on thermodynamic profiles from collocated radiosondes (RS) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.17"/>, which limited the application of lidar measurements for aerosol hygroscopicity investigations. To extend the applicability of the technique to other studies, RH profiles have been derived by combining temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) profiles from microwave radiometers (MWR) with water vapour mixing ratio profiles from Raman lidar observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.18"/>. However, uncertainties in the MWR temperature profiles, due to their lower spatial resolution, can affect the accuracy in the derived RH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.19"/> and in the retrieved aerosol hygroscopicity parameters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.20"/>. Despite these approaches having served as useful benchmarks, long-term vertically resolved analyses of aerosol hygroscopicity remain limited <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.21"/>. Indeed, most previous studies have been conducted during specific field campaigns or have focused on only a few case studies, often based on nighttime observations. Furthermore, comprehensive aerosol hygroscopicity studies require simultaneous measurements of aerosol chemical composition and particle size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.22"/>, which are not always available.</p>
      <p id="d2e416">The Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) system, operating at the MeteoSwiss aerological station in Payerne, Switzerland, can overcome some of the previously mentioned limitations in aerosol hygroscopicity studies. Its capability to provide high-vertical-resolution profiles of aerosol backscatter, temperature, and water vapour mixing ratio and to operate continuously during both daytime and nighttime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.23"/> makes it particularly suitable for aerosol hygroscopicity studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.24"/>. In this context, the HYGRO19 field campaign, conducted from June to December 2019 in Payerne, represented a unique opportunity to combine continuous RALMO observations with complementary in situ techniques to characterise aerosol hygroscopicity under ambient atmospheric conditions. Furthermore, vertical aerosol measurements performed with the Compact Backscatter Aerosol Detector <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.25"><named-content content-type="pre">COBALD, </named-content></xref>, alongside RH profiles from operational RS41 radiosondes, permitted the direct comparison of aerosol hygroscopicity parameters retrieved from RALMO with those derived from vertically resolved in situ observations. This makes HYGRO19 one of the few studies in which aerosol hygroscopicity has been characterised vertically using balloon-borne COBALD-RS41 measurements. Additionally, complementary in situ measurements, including tandem nephelometers, were performed at ground level, enabling the evaluation of lidar retrievals in selected cases where the sampled layers were connected to the surface under well-mixed conditions. Nevertheless, some limitations arise from the different approaches and wavelengths used to obtain aerosol hygroscopicity parameters, since lidars rely solely on backscatter measurements, whereas tandem nephelometers use the scattering coefficient. Differences in sampling time and vertical representativeness further limit the direct comparability of the retrieved parameters.</p>
      <p id="d2e431">This work focuses on the characterisation of aerosol hygroscopicity during the HYGRO19 field campaign using complementary remote sensing and in situ techniques, and on assessing the consistency and limitations of their comparisons. Selected multi-instrument comparisons are performed between RALMO-derived hygroscopicity parameters and those obtained from vertically resolved in situ observations from COBALD-RS41 sondes and ground-based tandem nephelometer measurements. Continuous RALMO observations additionally provide a statistical characterisation of the temporal and vertical variability of aerosol hygroscopicity within the conditions that fulfil the retrieval criteria. Complementary aerosol and meteorological observations support the interpretation of the observed hygroscopic behaviour.</p>
      <p id="d2e434">The paper is structured as follows: Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> describes the experimental site and instrumentation, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> details the methodologies used, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> reports the main results and their discussion, and Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> summarises the conclusions and provides perspectives for future work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental site and instrumentation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>The HYGRO19 field campaign</title>
      <p id="d2e460">The intercomparison campaign of hygroscopic aerosol properties using remote sensing and in situ techniques (HYGRO19 campaign) was carried out from June to December 2019 at the MeteoSwiss aerological station in Payerne, Switzerland (46.82° N, 6.95° E, 49 m above sea level (a.s.l.)), which forms part of ACTRIS (Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure), EARLINET (European Aerosol Research Lidar Network), E-PROFILE (European Profiling Network), and GRUAN (GCOS Reference Upper-Air Network). The HYGRO19 campaign focused on the characterisation of hygroscopic aerosol growth under ambient atmospheric conditions using three complementary approaches: remote sensing measurements from the RALMO Raman lidar, ground-based in situ measurements from tandem nephelometers, and vertically resolved in situ measurements from COBALD sondes operated alongside RS41 radiosondes (COBALD-RS41). A central objective was to assess the consistency and limitations of the hygroscopicity parameters obtained with these techniques, accounting for their different optical properties, wavelengths, and sampling conditions. Continuous RALMO measurements of aerosol backscatter, temperature, and water vapour mixing ratio also enabled the temporal and vertical variability of aerosol hygroscopicity to be investigated within selected well-mixed layers. Additional aerosol and meteorological observations were used to characterise the atmospheric conditions and support the interpretation of the observed hygroscopic behaviour. The experimental station is located in a rural area of the Swiss Plateau, between the Jura Mountains (25 km to the Northwest) and the Alpine foothills (20 km to the Southeast). The site is characterised by a mid latitude continental climate with some influence of long-range transported pollution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.26"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>The RALMO Raman lidar system</title>
      <p id="d2e474">The RAman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) system is a custom-designed instrument developed by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) in collaboration with MeteoSwiss. It has been operating in the Payerne station since August 2008 and joined EARLINET the same year. The RALMO system uses a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">YAG</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> laser source that emits pulses at 355 nm (400 mJ), with a repetition rate of 30 Hz and a pulse duration of 8 ns. Before the laser emits to the atmosphere it is expanded to a diameter of 14 cm to reduce beam divergence (to 0.1 mrad). The receiving system consists of four telescopes with 30 cm parabolic mirrors symmetrically arranged with the vertically mounted beam expander to collect the backscattered photons, giving a field of views (FOV) of 0.2 mrad. These characteristics enable RALMO to operate during both daytime and nighttime. Optical fibres connect the telescope mirrors to two grating polychromators, which isolate the rotational-vibrational (VR) and pure-rotational (RR) signals. A detailed description of RALMO can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.27"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e492">The system optimises its operability in the incomplete overlap region because the Raman backscatter is excited by a single monochromatic beam and the designed reflective-type lidar telescopes minimise chromatic aberrations. Moreover, the fibre-coupled diffraction grating-based polychromator further reduces uncertainties induced by range-dependent optical imperfections of the lidar receiver to a negligible level <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.28"/>. The water vapour mixing ratio is computed from VR measurements of nitrogen and water vapour at wavelengths of 386.7 and 407.5 nm. The accuracy of RALMO water vapour measurements has been validated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.29"/>, showing good agreement with radiosonde observations and integrated water vapour retrieved from the Global Positioning System (GPS) and MWR.</p>
      <p id="d2e501">Temperature measurements with RALMO are obtained using four sections of the RR Raman spectrum around 355 nm, which relies on the rotational Raman scattering of oxygen and nitrogen molecules. The RR signal is separated from the elastic (Rayleigh and Mie) scattering using a two-stage temperature polychromator, which isolates specific rotational Raman lines while guiding the elastic signal through optical fibres to the detector. High-efficiency parabolic mirrors collect the signals, which are then filtered, fibre-coupled, and diffracted by a reflective holographic grating to resolve Stokes and anti-Stokes lines from different rotational quantum numbers. This configuration enables accurate and stable retrieval of atmospheric temperature profiles. Further details and a complete validation of the RALMO temperature channel are provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.30"/>. The system also registers the backscattered signal at 355 nm backscattered signal, which combined with one RR measurement allows the retrieval of independent aerosol backscatter and extinction measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="paren.31"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e510">For water vapour, nitrogen, and oxygen, the interference filters are centred at 407.5, 386.7 and 375.4 nm, respectively, each with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 0.33 nm. This configuration ensures minimal temperature sensitivity of the Raman scattering signal, with a relative change in transmitted intensity of 0.4 % per 100 K <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.32"/>, in agreement with values reported in the literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="paren.33"/>. It also minimises spectral differences between the laser emission and Raman channels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105 bib1.bibx106" id="paren.34"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>The COBALD-RS41 sondes</title>
      <p id="d2e530">COBALD is a lightweight (500 g) aerosol backscatter detector for balloon-borne measurements developed at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich) based on the original prototype by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="text.35"/>. Using two light-emitting diodes (LEDs) as light sources and a photodiode detector with FOV of 6°, COBALD provides aerosol backscatter at 455 and 940 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an accuracy of 5 % and a precision of 1 % for both channels, and temporal and spatial resolutions of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.36"/>. During the HYGRO19 field campaign, COBALD was combined with an additional meteorological radiosonde (RS41, Vaisala) to obtain measurements of temperature, pressure, and relative humidity. The RS41 sonde specifications for nominal measurement uncertainties, as provided by the manufacturer, are 0.3 °C for temperature below 16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.4 °C above that altitude, 0.01 hPa (decreasing with altitude) for pressure, and 4 % RH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="paren.37"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e575">The COBALD measurements are typically expressed as the backscatter ratio (BSR, Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), defined as the ratio of the total measured signal (normalised to the altitude-dependent LED power) to its molecular contribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.38"/>. The molecular contribution is computed following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.39"/> using the atmospheric number density of molecules derived from the collocated RS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.40"/>. A molecular extinction-to-backscatter ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sr is assumed.

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M13" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e652">During the HYGRO19 field campaign, the COBALD–RS41 sonde was used to obtain vertically resolved in situ observations of aerosol hygroscopicity parameters, providing the reference measurements for direct comparison with those retrieved from RALMO. However, the COBALD and RALMO systems differ in receiver FOV (0.01° for RALMO), which results in systematic differences in backscatter measurements that are corrected using Mie scattering simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>The tandem nephelometers</title>
      <p id="d2e666">The tandem nephelometers consisted of two integrating nephelometers operating in parallel and measuring the same air sample. One instrument operated at RH lower than 40 % (dry conditions), whereas the second was equipped with a humidification system allowing measurements at different RH conditions from 40 % to 90 % (wet conditions) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.42"/>. The dry scattering coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were measured using an Ecotech Aurora 3000 nephelometer at three wavelengths (450, 525, and 635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a 1 min sampling interval. The scattering coefficients under wet conditions were measured using a TSI 3563 integrating nephelometer at 450, 550, and 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, recording data every 1 min. The nephelometer data were corrected to account for angular truncation errors and instrument non-idealities, following the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.43"/> for the TSI instrument and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.44"/> for the Ecotech nephelometer. The setup consisted of a 30 min cycle beginning with a baseline (zero) measurement, followed by gradual increases of RH up to approximately 85 %–90 %. For the computations of the hygroscopicity parameters, the dry scattering coefficient measured at 525 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the Ecotech instrument was corrected to 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the Ångström exponent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.45"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Complementary instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d2e738">During the HYGRO19 campaign, complementary instruments were also employed to provide a comprehensive characterisation of aerosols. Continuous measurements of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and column-integrated extinction Ångström exponent (AOD-AE) were obtained from an AERONET sun photometer (SP) operating at Payerne since 2000 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.46"><named-content content-type="pre">Level 2 Version 3, </named-content></xref>. The station is also part of the European E‑PROFILE network <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.47"/> since 2008 and operates a CHM15k ceilometer (Lufft) emitting at 1064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which continuously records aerosol attenuated backscatter. Furthermore, within the framework of E‑PROFILE, a Doppler wind lidar profiler operates to measure horizontal and vertical wind components every 10 min, typically covering altitudes from 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to about 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above ground level (a.g.l.) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.48"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e777">Ground-based in situ measurements included an Aethalometer (AE31), operated by the Centre for Energy and Environmental Sciences at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), capable of providing aerosol absorption coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ab</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at seven wavelengths (from 370 to 950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The Aethalometer can also estimate equivalent black carbon (EBC) concentrations using wavelength-dependent mass absorption cross sections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.49"/>. Data processing followed Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW)/ACTRIS recommendations, including corrections for filter-loading and multiple-scattering effects and was harmonised as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="text.50"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e805">Additional in situ measurements of aerosol properties were conducted by the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA) as part of the NABEL (National Air Pollution Monitoring Network) programme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.51"/>. Particle mass concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> were determined in real time with a Fidas 200 optical aerosol spectrometer and corrected versus gravimetric reference data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.52"/>. Elemental carbon (EC) in PM<sub>2.5</sub> was obtained in the laboratory from PM<sub>2.5</sub> filter samples using a thermal optical EC analyser (Sunset Laboratory Inc.) following the EUSAAR2 protocol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.53"/>. The concentrations of sulphate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in PM<sub>10</sub> were determined from PM<sub>10</sub> filter samples using ion chromatography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.54"/>. Ammonium (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was estimated assuming complete neutralisation of sulphate and nitrate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.55"/>, and organic matter (OM) was derived from PM mass closure (PM = inorganic species + black carbon (BC) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OM). Furthermore, total carbon (TC) concentrations were obtained using the novel FATCAT (Fast Thermal Carbon Totalizer) system, developed by the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), with a detection limit of 0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g-C (micrograms of carbon) for a sampling interval of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.56"/>. Additionally, aerosol size distributions in the range 10 to 487 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were measured using a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS, TSI 3034) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.57"><named-content content-type="pre">PSI,</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Aerosol optical properties from Raman lidar measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e974">The combined use of elastic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.58"/> and Raman <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.59"/> backscattered signals allows the independent calculation of the aerosol backscatter coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.60"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="text.61"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M38" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the sub-index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the Raman molecular species, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molecular backscatter coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the calibration constant, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the backscattered signal from range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at either the elastic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or the Raman shifted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wavelengths. Stokes and anti-Stokes portions of the pure-rotational spectrum with opposite temperature dependence are summed, giving in good approximation a temperature-independent inelastic signal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.62"/>. The RALMO system provide accurate aerosol backscattered and extinction coefficients at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.237</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<sup>−1</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup>) compared with COBALD at 455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.63"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Water vapour mixing ratio, temperature and relative humidity profiles from Raman lidar measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e1276">Water vapour mixing ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is defined as the ratio of the mass of water vapour to the mass of dry air in a sample of the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.64"/>. Consequently, the ratio  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is proportional to the water vapour mixing ratio <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109 bib1.bibx110" id="paren.65"/>. Assuming identical overlap factors and the range-independent Raman backscatter cross sections for the two signals, this ratio can be expressed as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx110" id="paren.66"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M61" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and thus,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the backscattered signal ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of the temperature-dependent functions for the Raman nitrogen and water vapour channels, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the instrument calibration constant. For RALMO the calibration constant was determined by combining absolute calibration using collocated radiosondes with relative calibration based on the solar background <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.67"/>. The passband filter employed in RALMO allows the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MR</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be reasonably approximated as 1 (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>), resulting in essentially temperature-independent measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="paren.68"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1980">The exponential term (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) accounts for the difference in atmospheric transmission between the nitrogen and water vapour Raman wavelengths, mainly due to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dependence of Rayleigh scattering by molecules and an additional contribution from wavelength-dependent Mie scattering by aerosols. Molecular extinction can be estimated assuming US Standard Atmosphere, while the differential aerosol extinction is generally negligible under typical Payerne conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.69"/>, though it can reach up to 10 % in hazy conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.70"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2005">Temperature measurements with RALMO are obtained using RR Raman lidar signals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.71"/>, and combining these with water vapour mixing ratio measurements, it is possible to obtain RH profiles following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113" id="text.72"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M68" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the water vapour pressure, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the saturation vapour pressure. The water vapour pressure is related to the water vapour mixing ratio through:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M71" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.622</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the air pressure profile, estimated from the closest RS41 operational at Payerne. The saturation vapour pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is computed using the empirical formulation:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M74" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.107</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">273</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">273</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the constants <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 17.08 and 234.2, for temperature above 273 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.73"/>. RALMO relative humidity profiles have been validated against collocated RS41 radiosondes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx71" id="paren.74"/>, demonstrating strong performance. These capabilities make RALMO one of the few instruments worldwide capable of providing continuous daytime and nighttime profiles of water vapour mixing ratio, temperature, and relative humidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Aerosol hygroscopicity with tandem nephelometers</title>
      <p id="d2e2283">Aerosol hygroscopicity refers to the equilibrium water content of water-soluble particulate matter at RH below 100 % and, thereby altering particle size, shape and optical properties. Particularly, the impact of hygroscopic growth on aerosol optical properties is commonly studied using the enhancement factor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (RH), defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.75"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes an optical or microphysical aerosol property at RH, while the reference value, RH<sub>ref</sub>, corresponds to the lowest value within the analysed layer or time interval.</p>
      <p id="d2e2369">In the case of laboratory measurements, when RH can be controlled, the scattering enhancement factor can be determined using two instruments that measure the same aerosol optical property, such as the aerosol scattering coefficient. One instrument operates at RH below 40 % (dry conditions), whereas the second is equipped with a humidification system that enables measurements over an RH range from 40 % to 90 % (wet conditions). This configuration, known as a tandem nephelometer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.76"/>, allows the scattering enhancement factor to be determined using the following two-parameter equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.77"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the value at RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Hänel parameter characterising the magnitude of hygroscopic growth for the scattering enhancement. In the case of laboratory measurements, different RH ranges can be controlled, allowing measurements over a wide RH range from 40 % to 90 %. This enables a more robust determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> through linear fitting. Moreover, the use of the same measurement approach at different sites allows a direct intercomparison of the scattering enhancement factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Hereafter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for simplicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Aerosol hygroscopicity with lidar measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e2508">For lidar measurements, the aerosol optical parameter used to study aerosol hygroscopicity is the aerosol backscatter coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the backscatter enhancement factor is described as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.78"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M91" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In the particular case of the RALMO system, the Hänel parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can only be obtained at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since ambient RH cannot be controlled, it must be ensured that changes in aerosol optical properties are solely related to changes in RH. This is achieved by assuming a well-mixed atmospheric layer that typically occurs when water vapour mixing ratio and potential temperature profiles remain nearly constant with altitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.79"/>. Additionally, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.80"/>, potential changes in air-mass origin with altitude should be assessed using backward trajectories as complementary information to the thermodynamic profiles. When these conditions are fulfilled, RH<sub>ref</sub> is selected as the point with the lowest RH, typically corresponding to the lowest altitude, as RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase simultaneously with altitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.81"/>. Consequently, humidograms (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus RH) can be computed, and the Hänel parameter is obtained as the slope of the linear fit between the natural logarithms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH. Note that, for comparison with tandem nephelometers and previous studies, the backscatter enhancement factor is extrapolated or interpolated to the 40 %–85 % range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)), depending on the measured RH range. In the following, it is denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2729">It should be highlighted that the Hänel parameter may depend on the aerosol optical property for its computation. Consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values derived from aerosol backscatter measurements are not directly comparable to those obtained from total scattering measurements from tandem nephelometers. Moreover, the spectral dependence of hygroscopic growth can vary with particle size, as shown by Mie simulations in previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.82"/>. Therefore, the enhancement factor for the same RH may differ between wavelengths and particle sizes, which further complicates comparisons between the different techniques. In addition, uncertainties associated with the retrieval of aerosol hygroscopicity parameters should also be considered. In the case of lidar-derived parameters, these uncertainties can reach up to 20 % for RH uncertainties below 10 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.83"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Overview of the HYGRO19 field campaign</title>
      <p id="d2e2761">Continuous measurements of AOD and extinction AE (AOD-AE) obtained from the AERONET sun photometer during the HYGRO19 campaign in Payerne were analysed to characterise the columnar aerosol properties (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). Two clearly different periods were identified: the first, from June to August, characterised by relatively high aerosol loading, and the second, from September to December, dominated by low-pressure systems, persistent cloudiness, and lower aerosol concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.84"/>. During the first period, a large number of measurements were available, with a median AOD (500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09, where the uncertainty is expressed as half of the interquartile range (IQR/2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (Q3–Q1)/2)). Fine-mode particles predominated, as indicated by the median AOD-AE (440–870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) value of 1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19. Backward trajectory analyses using the HYSPLIT model (not shown) revealed that most air masses originated over mainland Europe, a major source of anthropogenic aerosols. However, on 26 and 27 June, an event influenced by North African air masses was observed, with high aerosol load (AOD (500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) up to 0.3) and low AOD-AE (reaching 0.4), typical of long-range transport of Saharan dust. In contrast, fewer measurements were available during the second period. The median AOD (500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and AOD-AE (440–870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values were 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 and 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13, respectively, characteristic of continental background aerosol.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2848">Hourly time series of AERONET observations during the HYGRO19 campaign from June–December 2019: <bold>(a)</bold> aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 380, 500, and 1020 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(b)</bold> extinction Ångström exponent (AOD-AE (440–870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2879">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> shows the temporal evolution of in situ ground-based measurements of aerosol scattering (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a) and absorption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ab</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, c) coefficients at different wavelengths, scattering Ångström exponent (SAE, b), absorption Ångström exponent (AAE, d), single scattering albedo (SSA, e), particulate matter (f), and chemical composition (g–h). Data are hourly values, except for TC concentrations and chemical compositions that correspond to 2-hourly and daily measurements, respectively (panels g and h). Unfortunately, during the HYGRO19 campaign, data from the Aurora dry nephelometer and the Aethalometer AE31 were available only since 6–8 August (a–e, g), whereas FATCAT data date since 27 July 2019 (g). The main statistical parameter for the entire campaign, as well as for the first and second periods separately, are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2909">During the campaign, the temporal evolution of the scattering coefficient (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>a) shows remarkable day-to-day variability, with values ranging from 0.97 to 206 Mm<sup>−1</sup>, and median values of 28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21 Mm<sup>−1</sup> and 19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 Mm<sup>−1</sup> at 450 and 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Several intense events with higher scattering coefficients values were observed between 21 August and 21 September, 17 October and 1, 9, 26, 30 November and 7 December 2019, coinciding with increases in aerosol loading (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>) and particulate matter (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>f). Concurrently, the analysis of the SAE (450–635 nm, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b) suggests a predominance of fine particles (SAE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), although some outliers are observed. Separately, the AERONET AOD-AE measurements (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b) also suggest a general predominance of fine particles in the atmospheric column, with a median AOD-AE (440–870 nm) value of 1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21 for the entire campaign. These observations refer to different temporal coverage and sampling conditions and should not be interpreted as a quantitative agreement between the two datasets. The predominance of fine particles near the surface is also supported by the small difference observed between PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>f). The low PM concentrations (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.85"/>), characterised by a predominance of fine-mode (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) over coarse-mode (PM<sub>10−2.5</sub>) mass, are typical of a rural site such as Payerne. Previous studies have reported that Payerne is usually influenced by local and Swiss Plateau emissions, as well as by the transport of anthropogenic pollution from mainland Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.86"/>. This description provides background information on the site and does not constitute a source attribution for individual episodes during HYGRO19.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3167">Time series of in situ ground-based measurements of <bold>(a)</bold> aerosol scattering coefficient at 450, 525, and 635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> scattering Ångström exponent (SAE (450–635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) from the Aurora 3000 dry nephelometer; <bold>(c)</bold> absorption coefficient at 370, 520, and 880 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(d)</bold> absorption Ångström exponent (AAE (370–950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) from the aethalometer AE31; <bold>(e)</bold> single scattering albedo (SSA (520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) derived from the dry nephelometer and aethalometer data, <bold>(f)</bold> PM concentrations, <bold>(g)</bold> equivalent black carbon at 880 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the aethalometer and total carbon concentrations from FATCAT; and <bold>(h)</bold> chemical composition. The data represent hourly mean values, except for TC concentrations and chemical compositions that are 2-hourly and daily measurements.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3253">Statistical summary of the aerosol scattering and absorption coefficients at 450 and 520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the scattering Ångström exponent (SAE (450–635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) and absorption Ångström exponent coefficient (AAE (370–950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)), single scattering albedo (SSA (520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)), PM, equivalent and total black carbon concentrations, as well as chemical composition. Note that ammonium was derived assuming complete neutralisation and OM was estimated from PM mass closure.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IQR/2 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IQR/2 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Entire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jun–Aug</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sep–Dec</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Entire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Jun–Aug</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Sep–Dec</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EBC (880 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SAE (450–635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">TC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ab</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EC  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 (4.6 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 (3.8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 (5.2 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AAE (370–950 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 (4.4 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 (5.3 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 (3.7 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SSA (520 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 (4.1 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 (1.2 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22 (6.4 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<sub>10</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 (2.8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 (2.3 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 (3.2 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<sub>2.5</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 (83 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1 (87 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 (81 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4159">The analysis of the aerosol absorption coefficient (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>c) exhibits values ranging from 0.06 to 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a median of 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating substantial temporal variability but generally low absorption levels compared with values typically reported for suburban, urban, and traffic sites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.87"/>. This is consistent with the single scattering albedo values (SSA (520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>e). However, differences were observed between the two periods, with larger presence of absorbing particles during the second (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ab</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and AAE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.09</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than in the first period (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ab</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and AAE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The analysis of carbonaceous measurements further suggests that these changes can be associated with a higher frequency of local wood burning (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>g–h). Regarding chemical composition (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>h), inorganic species (sulphate, ammonium, and nitrate) show an important contribution to particulate matter, accounting for 11 %. However, the TC values compared with measured inorganic species and PM<sub>2.5</sub> support that organic matter is the main fraction (83 %), which is typically the largest fraction in summer (OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), compared with the second part of the campaign (OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). The predominance of organic aerosol and its larger contribution during summer (55 %–60 %) than in winter (30 %–40 %) have also been reported at Payerne <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.88"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4367">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> shows the temporal evolution of vertical profiles of the aerosol backscatter coefficient at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, temperature, water vapour mixing ratio, relative humidity, and the backscatter enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)) obtained with the RALMO system during the HYGRO19 campaign. For simplicity, the data are shown only in the lower troposphere (0–6 km a.g.l.). The temporal and spatial resolutions were 30 min and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Note that the white regions in the figure correspond to areas where retrievals were not possible due to cloudy conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e4400">The key result from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> is the capability of RALMO to provide continuous daytime and nighttime observations with high temporal and vertical resolution, enabling continuous monitoring of atmospheric vertical profiles and aerosol hygroscopic parameters (panel e). Temperature and water vapour mixing ratio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b–c) show a similar temporal evolution over the campaign period, with higher values in summer and lower values towards winter, and generally decreasing with altitude. Both parameters exhibited higher values during late June to early August, reaching maxima of 305.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 15.2 g kg<sup>−1</sup> below 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a.g.l., respectively. Later, both temperature and water vapour mixing ratio decrease, reaching their minimum values in December. These behaviours correspond to the typical seasonal evolution of atmospheric conditions in Payerne <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.89"/>. The median and half of the interquartile range of these parameters for the entire period, as well as for the aforementioned sub-periods, are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. The values are separated below 1.5 km a.g.l. and above that, because aerosol, temperature, and water vapour profiles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a–c) reveal the highest values within the first 1.5 km a.g.l. corresponding approximately to the mean atmospheric boundary layer (a.b.l.) height <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.90"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4446">The analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a) reveals again two very distinct periods. The first corresponds to June–August, when the highest values are observed, while the second period is from September–December and exhibits considerably lower values. This is consistent with the analysis of AERONET measurements (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a). During the first period, aerosol is frequently present throughout the entire ABL and even within the free troposphere (FT). However, on some days, aerosol layers are observed above and decoupled from the ABL (e.g. 2–5 and 17–19 July). In the second period, aerosol backscatter is generally lower (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>), and aerosol is typically confined below 1.0 km a.g.l., consistent with a lower ABL height <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.91"/>. However, an episode of relatively enhanced aerosol backscatter extending into the FT is observed around 1 December.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4471">Temporal and vertical evolution of RALMO measurements during the HYGRO19 field campaign at the MeteoSwiss station in Payerne from June to December 2019. <bold>(a)</bold> Aerosol backscatter coefficient at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> temperature, <bold>(c)</bold> water vapour mixing ratio, <bold>(d)</bold> relative humidity, and <bold>(e)</bold> backscatter enhancement factor at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 85 % RH, normalised to 40 % RH.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e4515">Statistical analysis of the aerosol backscatter coefficient, temperature, water vapour mixing ratio, relative humidity retrieved with RALMO during the HYGRO19 campaign at different height ranges.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">0.0–1.5 km a.g.l. </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">1.5–3.5 km a.g.l. </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IQR/2 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IQR/2 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Entire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Jun–Aug</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sep–Dec</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Entire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Jun–Aug</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Sep–Dec</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">285.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">288.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">279.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">277.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">279.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">273.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Water vapour mixing ratio (g kg<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RH (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Aerosol hygroscopicity analyses using remote sensing techniques</title>
      <p id="d2e4933">The backscatter enhancement factor retrieved with RALMO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)) during the campaign was computed within the layers fulfilling the criteria described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>. To assess potential changes in air-mass origin with altitude, as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.92"/>, 5 d (120 h) backward trajectories arriving over Payerne were calculated for each investigated hygroscopic aerosol layer using the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx88" id="paren.93"><named-content content-type="pre">HYSPLIT model 5.4.0;</named-content></xref>. The trajectory analysis considered arrival times corresponding to the RALMO observations and arrival heights at the lower and upper boundaries of the investigated layers. A detailed comparison of the trajectories arriving at both boundaries is provided in the Supplement (Sect. S1 and Fig. S1). For comparison with parameters derived with others instruments, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) was interpolated or extrapolated to the 40 %–85 % RH range (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>e). A total of 227 hygroscopic aerosol growth cases were recorded, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) values ranging from 1.2 to 7.2 and a median of 2.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) of 0.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18. Most hygroscopic layers were observed in summer (177 hygroscopic layers, 78 %), whereas only a few cases were detected during October–December, not permitting a robust statistical comparison between the two periods.</p>
      <p id="d2e5007">Frequency histograms of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>. To study differences with altitude, two layers were distinguished: one below 1.5 km a.g.l. (orange line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>), typically below the ABL, where most aerosol particles are found, and the other one above 1.5 km a.g.l. (red line), generally associated with the FT at the Payerne station. To evaluate whether the differences with altitude are statistically significant, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann–Whitney <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> tests were applied. The Kruskal-Wallis test determines whether three or more independent groups differ significantly based on ranked data, while the Mann–Whitney <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test assesses differences between two independent groups based on ranked observations using the sum of ranks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.94"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5054">For the backscatter enhancement factor (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a), no significant differences were observed between all data and the different layer base heights (Kruskal-Wallis <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Mann–Whitney <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; at the 95 % confidence level), with the frequency distribution skewed towards values lower than 4.0. The Hänel parameter (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b), however, follows an approximately normal frequency distribution, and the differences between layers are small and not statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In general, the retrieved values indicated significant aerosol hygroscopicity, with 64 % of the cases exhibiting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) values between 2.0 and 4.0, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) values in the range 0.50–0.99. The most frequent hygroscopic aerosol layers were observed below 1.5 km a.g.l., with 162 layers (71.4 %) and retrieved hygroscopicity parameters of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Layers above 1.5 km a.g.l. were less frequent but exhibited similar hygroscopicity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e5247">Frequency of occurrence of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) obtained from RALMO measurements during the HYGRO19 field campaign from June to December 2019. The analysis includes all detected aerosol hygroscopicity layers, as well as cases recorded below and above 1.5 km a.g.l.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the number of cases.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5299">The large database of aerosol hygroscopic cases during the HYGRO19 campaign allows for an investigation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) with height. In this context, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> shows box–whisker plots of these parameters for different height ranges, which were determined by optimising the number of bins in the vertical histograms using established statistical rules for histogram bin selection (Doane’s rule <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.95"/>, Rice’s rule <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="altparen.96"/>, and Scott’s normal reference rule <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="altparen.97"/>). These methods account for different characteristics of the data distribution, including the number of observations, variability, and skewness. The analyses are also presented separately for the convective boundary layer (CBL), the residual layer (RL), and the FT, using the ABL operational products at Payerne station developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.98"/>. Additionally, the statistical parameters and the frequency of occurrence (rel. freq.) derived are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e5343">Box-whisker plots of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) and <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) by different height ranges. The analyses are also presented for the CBL, RL, and FT <bold>(b, d)</bold>. In each box plot, the central mark represents the median, the red point indicates the mean, and the box extends vertically from the 25th to the 75th percentiles. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the number of cases.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5406">Results from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a, c and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> show the vertical variability of aerosol hygroscopicity parameters. In general, some vertical variability is observed, with the highest hygroscopicity parameters found between 606–912 m a.g.l. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18), and between 1830 and 2136 m a.g.l. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.77 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19). Some height ranges show appreciable differences (e.g., between 606–912 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a.g.l., and between 1218–1524 m a.g.l.), for which the Mann–Whitney <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test yielded a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of 0.01. However, the low number of data, particularly for the highest layers, and the range of variability of median values are below 20 %, which is within the uncertainties of the methodology. The most important point to remark is the large variability of the hygroscopicity parameters, as reflected by the large standard deviations and percentile ranges. Grouping <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) into the CBL, RL and FT (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>b, d) increases the number of data and makes the statistics more robust. Nevertheless, the analysis did not reveal any significant differences, as the mean, median and percentile values are very similar. Particularly, slightly higher hygroscopicity was observed in the FT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16), lower values were obtained in the CBL (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17) and the highest frequency of occurrence was found in the RL. Overall, these results suggest no clear vertical dependence of aerosol hygroscopicity, and the observed height-dependent patterns should be interpreted with caution, since apparent differences may be amplified by the limited number of observations per layer or by inherent methodological limitations. For instance, the different RH ranges used to compute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) in the humidograms (not all experimental cases cover the same minimum-to-maximum RH range), along with uncertainties in RH measurements, can affect the retrieval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.99"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e5677">Statistical analysis of hygroscopic aerosol layers retrieved with RALMO during the HYGRO19 campaign at different height ranges.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Height range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. (rel.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(m a.g.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IQR/2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IQR/2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">freq. (%))</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">300–606</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37 (16.3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">606–912</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37 (16.3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">912–1218</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35 (15.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1218–1524</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53 (23.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1524–1830</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16 (7.1)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1830–2136</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17 (7.5)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2136–2442</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13 (5.7)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2442–2748</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4 (1.8)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2748–3054</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8 (3.5)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3054–3360</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7 (3.1)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e6093">To further investigate temporal changes in aerosol hygroscopicity, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> shows the monthly evolutions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) during the HYGRO19 campaign. Results are presented as box-whisker plots, with the most important statistical parameters summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"/>, which also includes surface chemical composition (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>). Note that chemical composition data are available at daily resolution and correspond to surface measurements, whereas hygroscopicity parameters are derived from RALMO measurements at higher temporal resolution and at different altitudes. These hygroscopicity studies require well-mixed conditions within the analysed layers, which may be decoupled from the surface, particularly when located in the free troposphere. Therefore, thermodynamic homogeneity within a selected layer does not establish that it is mixed with the surface or that its aerosol chemical composition is represented by surface measurements. Additionally, these conditions are met during specific periods and may not persist throughout the day to which the surface chemical composition measurements correspond. Therefore, the surface chemical measurements are used to characterise near-surface aerosol composition, rather than to attribute the hygroscopicity of individual elevated layers to specific chemical components. Such attribution would require vertically resolved chemical measurements, and the uncertainty associated with extrapolating surface composition cannot be quantified here.</p>
      <p id="d2e6124">The largest number of cases for studying aerosol hygroscopicity was in July (104 layers, 45.8 %), followed by August (55 layers, 24.3 %) and September (40 layers, 17.6 %), whereas fewer cases were recorded from October to December (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"/>). The most hygroscopic layers occurred in June (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.70 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15), while lower hygroscopicity was observed in October and December (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08), as well as in July (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.49 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15). Consistent with these differences, the Mann–Whitney <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test revealed statistically significant differences between June and July (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). High values were also recorded in September, which likewise showed statistically significant differences compared with July. High hygroscopicity was also observed in November, although only three cases were identified (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"/>).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e6300">Box-whisker plots of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) from RALMO measurements for every month during the HYGRO19 field campaign. In each box plot, the central mark represents the median, the red point indicates the mean, and the box extends vertically from the 25th to the 75th percentiles. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the number of cases.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e6355">Statistical analysis of aerosol hygroscopicity parameters retrieved from RALMO measurements and surface chemical composition obtained during the HYGRO19 campaign for hygroscopic aerosol cases detected during each month.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">Aerosol hygroscopicity parameters </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col9" align="center">Chemical composition </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col9" align="center">median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IQR/2 </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Month</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IQR/2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IQR/2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (rel. freq. (%))</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">OM</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) (%)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">June</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18 (7.9)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 (4.6)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 (5.0)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 (1.1)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 (2.2)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60 (87)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">July</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.49</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">104 (45.8)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 (3.5)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 (6.6)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 (1.2)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 (2.8)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 (86)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">August</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.66</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55 (24.3)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 (4.2)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 (6.3)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 (1.1)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 (2.7)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 (83)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">September</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.99</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 (17.6)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 (5.0)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 (5.5)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 (3.1)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 (2.9)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 (83)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">October</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 (0.90)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 (6.0)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 (4.9)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 (2.7)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 (2.6)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78 (84)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">November</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.66</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3 (1.3)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 (5.7)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 (1.6)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 (4.3)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 (1.8)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 (87)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">December</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5 (2.2)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 (4.7)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 (3.1)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21 (7.1)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 (3.3)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 (82)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e7211">Results from Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"/> show that organic matter was the dominant component of the near-surface aerosol (4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (83 %)), whereas inorganic species accounted for approximately 11 % of the aerosol composition. The inorganic fraction was mainly composed of sulphate (0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (4.4 %)), nitrate (0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (4.1 %)) and ammonium (0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (2.8 %)). Elemental carbon showed a low concentration (0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (4.6 %)). Previous studies have also reported an important contribution of organic aerosol at Payerne <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.100"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. During the campaign, this contribution was particularly high in summer, especially in June (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"/>), and may partly reflect enhanced photochemical activity during this season <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.101"/>. In contrast, during autumn and winter, black carbon concentrations increase due to greater residential wood burning and a shallower boundary layer in the region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.102"/>, and these particles are typically less hygroscopic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.103"/>. The predominance of scattering and fine particles, together with lower concentrations of carbonaceous species during summer, may be associated with the higher hygroscopicity observed during this period compared with the second part of the campaign (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). However, the surface composition does not establish the chemical composition of the layers analysed with RALMO and cannot, by itself, explain their retrieved hygroscopicity.</p>
      <p id="d2e7380">Changes in the light-scattering and backscatter due to hygroscopic water uptake at a given RH also depend on particle size. This effect was assessed using the extinction AE from sun photometer measurements. The relationship between particle size and the enhancement factor shows no clear dependence on particle size, with differences not being statistically significant. Fine particles yielded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.49 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14, compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.80 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22 for larger particles. The corresponding analysis is shown in Fig. S3 in the Supplement. Previous studies have also reported no clear dependence of aerosol hygroscopicity on particle size, with different size-dependent hygroscopic behaviours observed depending on aerosol properties and atmospheric conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx117 bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx95" id="paren.104"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7479">Wind speed and wind direction allow investigating the relationship between air-mass origin and aerosol hygroscopic behaviour. The profile data were obtained using a Doppler wind lidar. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> illustrates the temporal evolution of wind direction for the detected hygroscopic aerosol layers (a), monthly wind-rose diagrams as a function of wind speed (b) and the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) (c). Data from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> show that during summer more wind profiles could be monitored due to lower cloud cover, allowing the observation of distinct vertical wind structures. Near the surface, Northeast (NE) winds were frequently observed, while above that winds predominantly originated from the Southwest (SW) and West (W). Wind speeds were around 5 to 8 m s<sup>−1</sup> (inset in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a), with a median value of 4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 m s<sup>−1</sup>, corresponding to a moderate breeze <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="paren.105"/>. These conditions are typical of high-pressure systems, which occur more frequently in summer over central Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.106"/>. In contrast, during autumn and winter months, layers were mostly monitored below 1.5 km a.g.l., predominantly due to instrumental limitations under cloudy conditions associated with more frequent presence of low-pressure systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.107"/>. Southwestern and Western air masses, originating in the Atlantic, travel through France before reaching Payerne, suggesting a possible mixture of particles (backward trajectories computed with HYSPLIT are not shown for clarity). Similar results were found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.108"/> at the Jungfraujoch alpine site (Switzerland), where higher hygroscopicity was observed for winds from the SW or W and lower for other wind directions. Layers with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in July–September also showed SW–W winds above 5 m s<sup>−1</sup>. Lower hygroscopicity in late June and July can be associated to the presence of dust particles, due to the influence of air masses from Southern Europe and North Africa, consistent with other studies in Switzerland <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.109"/>. Northeast winds are observed mostly at surface level, with wind speeds of 3–6 m s<sup>−1</sup>, suggesting the influence of Central European urban and industrial emissions, containing less hygroscopic black carbon and organic matter.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e7594">Temporal and vertical evolution of wind direction <bold>(a)</bold> for the hygroscopic aerosol layers from wind profiler measurements during the HYGRO19 field campaign (June–December 2019). The inset in panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the wind rose. Monthly wind rose plots depicting wind speed <bold>(b)</bold> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) from RALMO measurements <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e7634">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5"/> summarises some of the most relevant studies on aerosol hygroscopicity based on aerosol optical properties. When reported, aerosol chemical composition is provided; otherwise, site classification (e.g., urban, rural, marine) is used as a proxy for aerosol type. These studies are also classified according to whether they are based on remote sensing (lidar and ceilometer) or in situ (tandem nephelometers) techniques. Note that RALMO hygroscopicity parameters are provided at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 40 %–85 % RH range, whereas for some other studies, values are provided at different wavelengths and RH ranges due to differences in system configurations and experimental conditions. The main advance provided by the HYGRO19 campaign is the investigation of the temporal and vertical variability of the hygroscopicity parameters. Long-term analyses using remote sensing techniques have been reported in only a few studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.110"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, whereas most studies are limited to a small number of case studies or were conducted during specific field campaigns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.111"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. On the other hand, for tandem nephelometers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the results of this work are also comparable to those reported in previous studies based on in situ techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118 bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.112"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, with the differences being within the uncertainties associated with each technique.</p>

<table-wrap id="T5" specific-use="star"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d2e7688">Aerosol hygroscopicity parameters derived from aerosol light-scattering enhancement factors (in situ measurements) and aerosol backscatter enhancement factors (remote sensing observations) from this study and previous studies. Values are expressed as median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> half of the interquartile range for this study and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118" id="text.113"/>, and as mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.114"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Research type</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">Location</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">Instrument</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Chemical composition</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">Hygroscopicity</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1">Reference</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">or site type</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Statistics</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Payerne, Switzerland</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="2">Raman lidar</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low fractions (EC: 4.6 %)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="2">This study</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">227 cases</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">46.82° N, 6.95° E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mainly (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 11 %)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm): 0.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Campaign</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Melpitz, Germany</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tandem</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">rural</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118" id="text.115"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Feb–Mar</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52.53° N, 12.93° E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">nephelometers</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Case study</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Xinzhou, Shanxi</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raman Lidar</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mixed aerosols of</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm): 0.75</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.116"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">38.39° N, 112.7° E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">and RS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">anthropogenic origin</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Case study</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Madrid, Spain</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raman Lidar</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">marine mixed</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (532 nm): 0.62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.117"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40.46° N, 3.73° W</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">and RS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">with local aerosol</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Long-term</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Paris, France</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ceilometer</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low fractions (BC: 8 %)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (910 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.118"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8 cases</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48.71° N, 2.21° E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tower</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">higher (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.6–3.3</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2">Case study</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baltimore, Washington</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Remote</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="2">mainly (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 52 %)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="2"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.119"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">38.75–39.75° N</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">sensing</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">0.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">77.75–75.25° W</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">and In situ</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Long-term</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="2">23 Sites</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="2"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="text.120"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">and campaign</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tandem</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">urban and rural</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1–3</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">observations</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">nephelometers</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">marine</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2–4</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Campaign</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" morerows="2">Xiamen, China</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tandem</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">urban and rural</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.121"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Feb–Apr</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">nephelometers</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5–2</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Case study</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">Raman Lidar</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">regional pollution</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.122"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50.6° N, 3.1° E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Statistics</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wuhan, China</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Polarization</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">local and</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (532 nm)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" morerows="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.123"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">192 cases</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30.5° N, 114.4° E</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">lidar</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">regional pollution</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Assessment of different techniques for studying aerosol hygroscopic growth</title>
      <p id="d2e8462">Hygroscopic growth retrievals depend on both the measurement wavelength and the aerosol optical property, while chemical composition may also play an important role <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.124"/>. Consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values derived from aerosol backscatter measurements (e.g. lidar or COBALD) are not directly comparable to those obtained from total scattering measurements using tandem nephelometers. In addition, previous studies based on Mie simulations have shown that the spectral dependence of hygroscopic growth can depend on particle size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.125"/>. Therefore, enhancement factors for the same RH may differ between wavelengths and particle sizes, and values obtained from different techniques are expected to correlate in their variability, whereas their absolute values are not expected to be directly comparable.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>4.3.1</label><title>RALMO retrievals versus ground-based tandem nephelometers</title>
      <p id="d2e8500">During the HYGRO19 campaign, tandem nephelometers operated from October to December, providing the enhancement factor at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm)) derived from scattering coefficient measurements over a relative humidity range from below 40 % to 85 % (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>). Note that the tandem nephelometer measurements are representative only of near-surface conditions (approximately 3 m a.g.l.). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> shows the temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) retrieved with the tandem (cyan curve) and those values obtained with the RALMO system (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm), differentiating between cases detected within RL or FT (purple points and diamonds, respectively). Unfortunately no layers were detected in the CBL. Only seven hygroscopic aerosol layers could be identified using the RALMO data during this period, primarily due to the frequent presence of cloud, fog, and precipitation. The aerosol hygroscopicity parameters for coincident measurements between both methodologies are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"/>. During the period when tandem nephelometer measurements were available, fine (SAE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22) and large particles (SAE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20) exhibited very similar hygroscopic enhancement factors, with median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) values of 1.34 in both cases and IQR/2 values of 0.07 and 0.06, respectively. Similarly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values showed negligible differences (0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 and 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03, respectively).</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e8616">Temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm, 85 %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) obtained using a tandem nephelometers during the HYGRO19 field campaign. The purple points and diamonds indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) from RALMO measurements in the RL and FT, respectively. Note that the values for RALMO were normalised to 40 % RH, whereas the tandem measurements correspond to RH values below 40 %.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e8666">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> shows an approximately constant value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) below 1.5, with a median of 1.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07. A similar behaviour is observed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm), with a median of 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 (graph not shown for clarity). However, clear outliers were observed on 8 December, coinciding with a marked increase in the aerosol scattering coefficient, PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, and scattering AE (values greater than 2.0), along with increases in EBC and TC concentrations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). For this day, HYSPLIT backward trajectories showed long-range transport from the North Atlantic and North America (Fig. S5a in the Supplement), where numerous fire hotspots were detected by the NASA/NOAA Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership satellite (<uri>https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 5 November 2026, Fig. S5b in the Supplement). For the cases within the RL (12 November and 10 December 2019), good agreement was obtained between both techniques (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"/>). In contrast, the agreement for the FT cases was poorer, which is expected since aerosol layers in the free troposphere are largely decoupled from the boundary layer and typically exhibit different microphysical and optical properties than those near the surface. Nevertheless, the cases detected on 24 October and 13 December showed good agreement with the tandem nephelometers values, which can be explained by the presence of a well-mixed layer extending from the boundary layer into the lower free troposphere, allowing the hygroscopic layers to be representative of ground-based measurements.</p>
      <p id="d2e8725">Overall, the comparisons of lidar-derived aerosol hygroscopicity parameters with those from the tandem nephelometers show good agreement for layers below the ABL, as expected because lidar techniques require a well-mixed layer. The slightly lower values obtained from the tandem nephelometers compared with RALMO can be attributed to differences in the sampled aerosol populations, the specific optical quantities measured (scattering coefficient vs. backscatter coefficient) and the different wavelengths used by each instrument. This comparison should be interpreted with caution, since the retrievals are based on different wavelengths and optical properties, and the limited number of available RALMO cases should also be considered. To provide a preliminary physical baseline for assessing the effects of wavelength and the optical property considered under a common set of surface-based aerosol assumptions, Mie simulations were performed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.126"/> and are discussed later in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS5"/>. Particularly, particle-size effects on aerosol hygroscopicity for near-surface measurements were also investigated using the scattering Ångström exponent (SAE (450–635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) from the Aurora 3000 dry nephelometer. The results (not shown for clarity) indicate a weak dependence of the hygroscopic enhancement on particle size, with no statistically significant differences between small and large particles.</p>

<table-wrap id="T6" specific-use="star"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d2e8744">Values of the enhancement factor and Hänel parameter retrieved using the tandem nephelometers and RALMO instruments. Note that the values for RALMO were normalised to 40 % RH, whereas the tandem measurements correspond to RH values below 40 %.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" colsep="1">Tandem Nephelometers at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col8">RALMO at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hour (UTC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Hour (UTC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Layer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">24 October 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">FT</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 November 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">FT</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12 November 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">RL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6 December 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">FT</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6 December 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">FT</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10 December 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">09:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">08:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">RL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13 December 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">FT</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>4.3.2</label><title>Intercomparisons with COBALD-RS41 sondes I: 17 September 2019</title>
      <p id="d2e9295">The COBALD-RS41 sondes, which provide a unique opportunity to validate lidar-derived hygroscopicity parameters, were launched sporadically during the HYGRO19 campaign between 23:00 and 23:30 UTC. Comparisons with RALMO are performed using 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical intervals, resulting in a 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temporal resolution for the COBALD sondes. A key difference between remote sensing and balloon-borne techniques is that lidars probe the vertical air column directly above the laser, whereas balloon sondes can suffer of horizontal drifts with altitude due to winds. Consequently, in the presence of wind shear, the two instruments may sample different air masses, with the horizontal separation generally increasing with altitude. The COBALD and lidar systems also differ in receiver FOV (0.01° for RALMO and 6° for COBALD), resulting in systematic differences in backscatter measurements, which are corrected using Mie theory scattering simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.127"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e9317">The first case study focuses on 17 September 2019, when the region was affected by air masses originating from Northwestern Europe, passing over the Swiss Plateau and arriving at Payerne (backward trajectories shown in Fig. S2a in the Supplement). These air masses can transport anthropogenic and biogenic aerosols, especially considering that they travel at very low altitudes within the ABL. In situ measurements (graphs shown in Fig. S6 in the Supplement) indicate that scattering processes were dominated by fine particles (SAE (450–635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17), while absorbing particles also contributed notably (SSA (520 nm)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 and AAE (370–950 nm)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, Fig. S6a–d), suggesting the presence of a mixture of anthropogenic and biogenic particles. These observations are consistent with HYSPLIT backward trajectories, wind profiler measurements (wind speeds between 3 to 6 m s<sup>−1</sup> from the NE) and PM concentrations (Fig. S6e). Consistently, the daily surface aerosol chemical composition was dominated by OM (5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (85 %)), followed by EC (0.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (5.9 %)), SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (4.7 %)), NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (2.3 %)), and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (1.8 %)), suggesting minor contributions from local traffic emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.128"/>. Surface size distribution from SMPS (Fig. S6, right panels) confirmed the dominance of fine-mode particles (diameter lower than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), with a pronounced increase in Aitken-mode particles during the afternoon of 17 September (red curve, Fig. S6h), along with a slight enhancement in coarse mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m). In contrast, particle number concentrations on 18 September decreased from the first half of the day (00:00–12:00 UTC) to the second half (12:00–24:00 UTC), particularly for particles smaller than 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (green curve). The two-hourly mean particle size distributions on 17 September (Fig. S6i), revealed nearly constant particle number concentrations between 12:00 and 14:00 UTC, followed by a progressive increase in fine particles during the afternoon.</p>
      <p id="d2e9557">The temporal evolutions of aerosol backscatter coefficient, water vapour mixing ratio, and relative humidity on 17 September 2019 are illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>a–c. Ceilometer data were also available, which permits the retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 1064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived with the Klett inversion algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.129"/> at constant lidar ratio of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aerosol particles are observed up to approximately 3.5 km a.g.l. until 03:00 UTC, with peak of concentration below 2.5 km a.g.l.. Low clouds are also observed around 3.0–4.0 km a.g.l. between 07:00 and 11:00 UTC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>a). During nighttime, there is a considerable increase in the aerosol backscatter coefficient after 21:00 UTC, which became even more pronounced after 23:30 UTC within the 0.48–0.87 km a.g.l. layer. For this time interval, the RH values (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>c) show a strong correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the same time, the water vapour mixing ratio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>b) exhibited greater homogeneity, suggesting a well-mixed layer. Therefore, these measurements (dashed lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>a–c) fulfil the criterion for aerosol hygroscopicity studies and coincides with COBALD-RS41 sonde launch. The vertical profiles of aerosol backscatter, water vapour mixing ratio, and RH retrieved from RALMO, the ceilometer, and the COBALD-RS41 sonde are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>d–f.</p>
      <p id="d2e9626">The vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 23:00 and 23:59 UTC on 17 September show very similar patterns for the different instruments (RALMO, COBALD and ceilometer). RALMO recording the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, while the lowest values were registered by ceilometer. COBALD, however, revealed intermediate values. This pattern is consistent with the spectral dependence of light scattering using Mie theory for spherical particles, which indicates stronger backscattering in the ultraviolet than in the infrared region. Particularly, within the 0.48–0.87 km a.g.l. layer, a marked increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mm<sup>−1</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>d) was observed in coincidence with an increase in RH from 69 % to 86 % (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>e). The potential temperature and water vapour mixing ratio profiles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>f) exhibited relatively constant values within this layer, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">296.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 K and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, suggesting a well-mixed atmosphere.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e9751">Temporal evolution of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm), <bold>(b)</bold> water vapour mixing ratio, and <bold>(c)</bold> RH profiles from RALMO on 17 September 2019. <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles from RALMO at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (purple), COBALD at 455 and 940 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue and red), and ceilometer at 1064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black). <bold>(e)</bold> RH profiles from RALMO (purple) and RS41 (red). <bold>(f)</bold> Water vapour mixing ratio (purple) and potential temperature (blue) profiles from RALMO. The vertical profiles correspond to 23:30–23:59 UTC for RALMO and ceilometer, and 23:00–23:30 UTC for COBALD-RS41.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e9825">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/> shows the humidograms (dependency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with RH) for RALMO (355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), COBALD-RS41 (455 and 940 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the ceilometer (1064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) within the selected 0.48–0.87 km a.g.l. layer. Note that for homogeneity all the derived hygroscopicity parameters were normalised to the 40 %–85 % RH range. These parameters obtained using the different techniques for the three case studies are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>. It should be noted that different wavelengths were used in the retrievals.</p>
      <p id="d2e9880">Overall, there is good agreement between remote sensing (RALMO and ceilometer) and in situ vertical measurements (COBALD-RS41), with the differences being within the uncertainties of each method. In particular, the slight differences can be attributed to balloon drift with altitude, differences in integration time, and the high spatial and temporal variability of aerosol optical properties, which can lead to discrepancies between both techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.130"/>. More specifically, RALMO observed an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by a factor of 3.5, while RH increased from 68 % (reference RH) to 86 %, with the retrieved hygroscopicity parameters of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37, indicating high aerosol hygroscopicity. The ceilometer retrieval, however, yielded lower hygroscopicity parameters, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37. Using the in situ vertical technique with COBALD-RS41 sondes, the values obtained were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (455 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (455 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (940 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (940 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.06, showing no clear spectral dependence. The apparent differences in the spectral behaviour of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are between instruments uncertainties and do not clearly indicate a consistent wavelength dependence.</p>

      <fig id="F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e10112">Enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) retrieved from RALMO, COBALD-RS41 and ceilometer within the 0.48–0.87 km a.g.l. layer. The time interval corresponds to 23:30–23:59 UTC for RALMO and ceilometer, and 23:00–23:30 UTC for COBALD-RS41. The retrieved parameters are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>4.3.3</label><title>Intercomparisons with COBALD-RS41 sondes II and aerosol hygroscopicity near clouds: 12 November 2019</title>
      <p id="d2e10152">The second case study of aerosol hygroscopicity using RALMO and COBALD-RS41 sondes was conducted on 12 November 2019, when air masses originated over the North Atlantic Ocean, passed through France, and reached Payerne (backward trajectories shown in Fig. S2b in the Supplement). Wind profiler data at the height of this layer indicated relatively low wind speeds of 2.6 m s<sup>−1</sup> from the South (265°), suggesting local and regional aerosol influence. In situ measurements (graphs shown in Fig. S7 in the Supplement) during the period 11–13 November 2019 exhibited characteristics that could be attributed to local anthropogenic particles. On 11 November, both the scattering coefficient (a) and SSA (d) reached relatively high values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (450 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1 Mm<sup>−1</sup> and SSA (520 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06, respectively), indicating a clear predominance of scattering processes over absorption (Fig. S7b, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ab</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (520 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 Mm<sup>−1</sup>). From 12 November onwards, scattering and absorbing coefficients decreased markedly, coinciding with an increase in SAE (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. S7c), and a decrease in the albedo (SSA (520 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35) suggesting a greater contribution of absorbing aerosol and increased anthropogenic influence. Daily surface aerosol chemical measurements exhibited higher EC concentrations (0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>3</sup> (7.0 %)) than NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NH<sub>4</sub> (5.2 %, 3.7 % and 2.9 %, respectively) and slightly higher values than in the previous case study (EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Nevertheless, OM remained the dominant aerosol component (2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (81 %)).</p>
      <p id="d2e10357">Analysis of the temporal and vertical evolution of RALMO measurements in the lower troposphere (Fig. S8 in the Supplement, left panel) shows that the conditions required to investigate aerosol hygroscopicity were fulfilled between 23:30 and 23:59 UTC within the 0.47–0.99 km a.g.l. layer. Vertical profiles of aerosol and thermodynamic parameters for this layer (Fig. S8, right panel) show an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.15 to 0.30 Mm<sup>−1</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup> (Fig. S8d) and in RH from 65 % to 90 % (Fig. S8e). Meanwhile, the potential temperature and water vapour mixing ratio profiles (Fig. S8f) remained relatively constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">281.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14 K and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 g kg<sup>−1</sup>). High values in backscatter above the hygroscopic aerosol layer were associated with the presence of clouds, suggesting that hygroscopic conditions near the cloud base could facilitate particle activation as cloud condensation nuclei <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.131"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e10439">The uniqueness of the observations on this day is that a comprehensive assessment of aerosol hygroscopicity can be performed using all available techniques (RALMO, ceilometer, COBALD-RS41 sondes, and tandem nephelometers). RALMO humidogram (purple curve, panel a) reveals that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by a factor of 2.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 90 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), corresponding to a Hänel parameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, indicating lower aerosol hygroscopicity compared with the case on 17 September (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37). Ceilometer humidogram (black curve, panel a) showed slightly lower hygroscopicity, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05. By contrast, COBALD-RS41 sondes (blue and red curves, panel a) yielded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (455 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (455 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (940 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (940 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a). Despite these slight differences, the results indicate good agreement between the different techniques.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e10719">Enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) retrieved from <bold>(a)</bold> RALMO, COBALD-RS41 and ceilometer within the 0.47–0.99 km a.g.l. layer, and <bold>(b)</bold> from tandem nephelometers at different times on 12 November 2019. The parameters are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>. Note that the values in the left panel were normalised to dry conditions at 40 % RH, whereas the tandem measurements correspond to RH values below 40 %.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e10759">On the other hand, hygroscopic values obtained with the tandem nephelometers (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>b) closest in time to the RALMO retrievals on the same day (12 November 2019 at 11:00 UTC) show consistent values, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14, regardless of differences in sampling time, sampled aerosol, and specific optical properties (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>). The analyses of different humidograms with time for this day (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>b) indicate an increase in aerosol hygroscopicity over time, reaching maximum values at 11:00 UTC (cyan curve), whereas the subsequent available humidogram at 03:00 UTC (pink curve) shows that these processes were decreasing. From these results, it can be concluded that the different techniques are in good agreement within the uncertainties of each method, and may be attributable to differences in wavelength and sampling methods. Overall, no consistent spectral dependence of the retrieved hygroscopic parameters was identified across the different instruments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>4.3.4</label><title>Aerosol hygroscopicity and clouds: 10 December 2019</title>
      <p id="d2e10824">The last case study corresponds to 10 December 2019. HYSPLIT backward trajectories calculated at 500, 1000, and 1500 m a.g.l. (Fig. S2c in the Supplement) were nearly identical within the first 2 km a.g.l., suggesting that the origin and transport pathways of the air masses were independent of altitude. The air masses originated over the North Atlantic Ocean and travelled across France before reaching Payerne; therefore, the influence of a mixture of aerosol types is expected.</p>
      <p id="d2e10827">In situ measurements from 9 to 11 December 2019 (shown in Fig. S9 in the Supplement) revealed a marked increase in EBC concentrations (f) from 10 December onwards, suggesting large influence of heavily polluted anthropogenic aerosols from local emissions. The concurrent increase in scattering and absorption further indicates enhanced aerosol loading, and the low values of single scattering albedo (SSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08, Fig. S9d) suggest large influence of absorbing particles. Consistently, the daily surface aerosol chemical composition revealed similar concentrations of EC and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (6.3 %) and 0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (6.4 %), respectively), both higher than SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (4.1 %)) and NH<sub>4</sub> (0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (3.4 %)). This indicates a higher contribution of EC compared with 17 September (6.3 vs. 5.9 %), although lower than on 12 November (7.0 %).</p>
      <p id="d2e10960">Figure S10a–c (in the Supplement) shows the temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm), water vapour mixing ratio and RH profiles. The most relevant feature is the presence of clouds before 15:00 UTC as can be seen by the strong backscattering signal (Fig. S10a). Consequently, there are regions where retrievals were not possible. Later, low clouds dissipate and retrievals could be performed. From 08:00 to 08:30 UTC within the layer 0.70–0.97 km a.g.l. the requirements to study aerosol hygroscopicity are meet (dashed line in Fig. S10). Aerosol backscatter coefficients (Fig. S10d) showed an increase from 1.8 to 2.1 Mm<sup>−1</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup> at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, simultaneous with an increase in RH from 53 % to 66 % (Fig. S10e), while the potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">279.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and water vapour mixing ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) profiles remained relatively constant (Fig. S10f).</p>
      <p id="d2e11055">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>a shows the humidograms obtained with RALMO (purple) and ceilometer (black) measurements. Humidograms retrieved with the tandem nephelometers at different times are also illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>b. Results from RALMO showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased by a factor of 1.2, corresponding to a Hänel parameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24, indicating lower aerosol hygroscopicity compared to those obtained on 17 September (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37) and similar to that retrieved on 12 November (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). Values calculated using ceilometer measurements showed less agreement, which may be related to the lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to the cloud presence, yielding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03. Data from the tandem nephelometers at 09:00 UTC (cyan curve in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>b) were of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17, in strong agreement with the RALMO values (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>).</p>

      <fig id="F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e11282">Enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) retrieved from <bold>(a)</bold> RALMO and ceilometer within the 0.70–0.97 km a.g.l. layer, and from <bold>(b)</bold> tandem nephelometers at different times on 10 December 2019. The parameters are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>. Note that the humidograms in the left panel were normalised to dry conditions at 40 % RH, whereas the tandem measurements correspond to RH values below 40 %.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

<table-wrap id="T7" specific-use="star"><label>Table 7</label><caption><p id="d2e11325">Values of the enhancement factor and Hänel parameter retrieved using remote sensing and in situ techniques. Note that the values for RALMO, COBALD-RS41 and ceilometer were normalised to 40 % RH, whereas the tandem measurements correspond to RH values below 40 %. Values from different techniques are expected to correlate, whereas their absolute values are not directly comparable.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5">Case I: 17 September 2019 </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hour (UTC)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Technique</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Layer (km a.g.l.)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">23:30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">RALMO (355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">23:00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">COBALD-RS41 (455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3" morerows="1">0.48–0.87</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (455 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (455 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">COBALD-RS41 (940 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (940 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.06)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (940 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">23:30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ceilometer (1064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) = 5.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5">Case II: 12 November 2019 </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hour (UTC)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Technique</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Layer (km a.g.l.)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">23:30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RALMO (355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">0.47–0.99</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">23:00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">COBALD-RS41 (455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (455 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (455 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">11:00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Tandem (550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">ground</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm, 85 %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">23:00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">COBALD-RS41 (940 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">0.47–0.99</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (940 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (940 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">23:30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ceilometer (1064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col5">Case III: 10 December 2019 </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hour (UTC)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Technique</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Layer (km a.g.l.)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">08:00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RALMO (355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.70–0.97</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">09:00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tandem (550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ground</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">08:00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ceilometer (1064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.70–0.97</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1064 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e12476">Regarding the surface chemical measurements, used here to characterise the near-surface aerosol chemical composition, the enhanced EC content combined with the lower SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (4.1 vs 4.7 %) may explain why this case exhibited lower hygroscopicity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24) than on 17 September (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37). Actually, previous studies have also reported that particles with high EC concentrations tend to exhibit lower hygroscopicity, while those primarily composed of sulphuric acid and ammonia show higher hygroscopicity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.132"/>. But the key aspect here is the close proximity to clouds, suggesting how aerosol hygroscopicity can facilitate particle activation as cloud condensation nuclei under favourable thermodynamic and dynamical conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.133"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS5">
  <label>4.3.5</label><title>Assessment of aerosol hygroscopicity using Mie simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e12555">To assess the effects of wavelength and optical property on the retrieved hygroscopicity parameters, a quantitative comparison was performed using preliminary, surface-based Mie simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.134"/>. Aerosol backscatter coefficients at the RALMO and COBALD wavelengths (355 and 455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) and aerosol scattering coefficients at the tandem nephelometer wavelength (550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were simulated using the Mie code <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.135"/>. For these simulations, daily surface aerosol chemical composition measurements (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>) were used to estimate the effective dry-particle refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using a volume-weighted mixing rule <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.136"/>, as well as the hygroscopicity parameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.137"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; </named-content></xref>. The refractive indices of the individual dry aerosol components used as inputs to the Mie simulations are provided in Table S1 of the Supplement. Hygroscopic particle growth and the corresponding wet particle size distributions were then calculated from the measured dry SMPS size distributions using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.138"/>. Finally, the change in refractive index due to water vapour uptake was calculated by volume-weighting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the refractive index of water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.139"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; </named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e12651">Based on these calculations, the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on RH (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>) was obtained for the study cases with available SMPS size distributions. The simulated hygroscopicity parameters (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8"/>) suggest that differences in wavelength and optical property alone may not explain the differences observed between the RALMO and tandem-nephelometer hygroscopicity retrievals (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>). Under the assumption of the same aerosol population, surface chemical composition, and hygroscopic growth, the Mie simulations yielded similar or larger hygroscopicity parameters for scattering at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than for backscatter at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm)  ranging from 0.31 to 0.41 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) from 0.30 to 0.32. Differences among the dry size distributions (Fig. S4 in the Supplement) could partly account for the range of values obtained for the simulated hygroscopicity parameters. Since the Mie size parameter depends on both particle size and wavelength, hygroscopic growth can modify the relative scattering and backscatter behaviour at the different wavelengths. Therefore, the larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) values should not be interpreted as a general increase in aerosol hygroscopicity with wavelength. Conversely, the simulations yielded greater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 355 than at 455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in qualitative agreement with the RALMO and COBALD-RS41 retrievals (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>).</p>

      <fig id="F13" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d2e12757">Enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) retrieved from Mie simulations for <bold>(a)</bold> 17 September 2019 at 23:30 UTC, <bold>(b)</bold> 24 October 2019 at 16:00 UTC, <bold>(c)</bold> 9 November 2019 at 17:00 UTC, and <bold>(d)</bold> 12 November 2019 at 23:30 UTC. Backscattering simulations are shown at 355 and 455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and scattering simulations at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that the humidograms were normalised to 40 % RH.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/15653/2026/acp-26-15653-2026-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

<table-wrap id="T8" specific-use="star"><label>Table 8</label><caption><p id="d2e12820">Values of the enhancement factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Hänel parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) retrieved from Mie simulations at 355 and 455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for aerosol backscatter and at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for aerosol scattering. Note that all values are normalised to 40 % RH. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the ratios between the corresponding enhancement factors and Hänel parameters at the indicated wavelengths, respectively.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,  85/40 %) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SMPS interval</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">355</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">355</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17 September 2019 23:30 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22:00–24:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">24 October 2019 16:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16:00–18:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 November 2019 17:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16:00–18:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12 November 2019 23:30 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22:00–24:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SMPS interval</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (455 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">355</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">455</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">355</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17 September 2019 23:30 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22:00–24:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">24 October 2019 16:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16:00–18:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 November 2019 17:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16:00–18:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12 November 2019 23:30 UTC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22:00–24:00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e13693">Results from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8"/> also show that the simulated hygroscopicity parameters are generally closer to those obtained with the surface tandem nephelometers (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"/>). This numerical similarity should not be interpreted as a quantitative closure, since the sampling times and reference RH conditions are not identical in all comparisons. Nevertheless, it may partly result from the fact that both the SMPS size distributions and the chemical composition used as inputs to the Mie calculations are measured at the surface. This subsection clarifies the surface-based nature of the simulations and the limitations of their comparison with vertically resolved retrievals. Consequently, differences between the simulated and RALMO-derived hygroscopicity may also reflect changes in aerosol size distribution, composition, morphology, and refractive index with altitude, particularly for decoupled aerosol layers. These results are consistent with previous Mie studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.140"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, which showed that aerosol hygroscopicity derived from scattering and backscatter can depend on particle size, chemical composition, and wavelength.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e13716">This study has focused on aerosol hygroscopicity during the intercomparison campaign of hygroscopic aerosol properties using remote sensing and in situ techniques (HYGRO19 campaign), which was carried out at the MeteoSwiss aerological station in Payerne, Switzerland (46.82° N, 6.95° E, 491 m a.s.l.) from June to December 2019. The continuous operation of the RAman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO), which provides measurements of temperature, water vapour mixing ratio, and aerosol backscatter during both daytime and nighttime, enabled aerosol hygroscopicity to be investigated under different atmospheric conditions over a 6-month period. More than 200 hygroscopic aerosol layers were identified, constituting one of the largest databases available for Raman lidar aerosol hygroscopicity studies. The use of balloon-borne Compact Backscatter Aerosol Detectors coupled with Vaisala RS41 radiosondes (COBALD-RS41) provided unique vertically resolved in situ observations for direct comparison with RALMO retrievals. Additionally, tandem nephelometer measurements allowed aerosol hygroscopicity to be evaluated under well-mixed near-surface conditions. Complementary in situ and remote sensing observations were also used to provide a comprehensive characterisation of aerosol and atmospheric conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e13719">Two contrasting aerosol regimes were observed during the campaign. The first, from June to August 2019, was characterised by relatively high aerosol loading and frequent clear-sky conditions, whereas the second, from September to December, was dominated by low-pressure systems, persistent cloudiness, and reduced aerosol concentrations. The median values of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) at 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and extinction Ångström exponent (AOD-AE) between 440–870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 and 1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19, respectively, during the first period, representing a considerable aerosol load for a rural background site such as Payerne. Backward-trajectory analyses indicated the influence of air masses from mainland Europe, which typically act as a source of anthropogenic pollution. However, some cases of air masses originating from Southwestern Europe and North Africa were also detected, showing higher aerosol loads (AOD (500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) approximately 0.3) and low AOD-AE values (approximately 0.4), suggesting the presence of dust particles. During the second period, only a few AERONET measurements were available, with median AOD (500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and AOD-AE (440–870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values of 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 and 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13, respectively, more typical of a rural background site. These meteorological conditions largely limited the number of cases available for aerosol hygroscopicity studies using RALMO.</p>
      <p id="d2e13791">Aerosol hygroscopicity retrieved with RALMO showed high hygroscopic growth, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm, 85 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) values ranging from 1.2 to 7.2 and a median of 2.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64, corresponding to a median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M928" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) of 0.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18. The highest occurrence was in summer (177 layers, 78 % of all cases), with aerosols being more hygroscopic in June (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.70 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15). Fewer cases were detected during October–December, when lower hygroscopicity was observed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08), limiting the representativeness of comparisons with summer. Complementary surface chemical measurements showed a predominance of organic matter (OM) during both campaign periods, with a higher sulphate mass fraction in June–August and higher elemental carbon (EC) and nitrate mass fractions in September–December. This contrast in surface aerosol chemical composition between the two periods may help explain the observed differences in hygroscopicity. However, the surface observations provide context for the campaign and do not establish the chemical drivers of the temporal variability in vertically resolved aerosol hygroscopicity. Regarding the vertical variability of aerosol hygroscopicity, no statistically significant differences were observed between layers below and above 1.5 km a.g.l., used as a threshold to distinguish the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) from the Free Troposphere (FT). A more detailed classification distinguishing the Convective Boundary Layer (CBL), Residual Layer (RL), and FT showed no statistically significant differences.</p>
      <p id="d2e13931">Multi-instrument comparisons showed generally consistent hygroscopic behaviour between RALMO, COBALD-RS41, and tandem nephelometer observations in the analysed case studies. RALMO and tandem nephelometer retrievals showed good agreement for aerosol layers within the residual layer, when well-mixed conditions extended up to the RL. For example, on 10 December 2019, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (355 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 was obtained from RALMO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (550 nm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 from the tandem nephelometers. However, some discrepancies were found for some layers identified within the free troposphere, which may be due to the presence of decoupled layers, which can exhibit different optical and microphysical properties compared to those near the surface. The results obtained confirmed the capability of these techniques to robustly characterise aerosol hygroscopicity, as indicated by the close agreement between the retrieved hygroscopicity parameters and their associated uncertainties. No consistent spectral dependence was identified from the available observational case studies. The small number of cases and the differences in sampling and retrieval methodology between instruments prevent a robust assessment of a general wavelength dependence. Since the different techniques rely on different aerosol optical and microphysical properties, measurement wavelengths, sampling conditions and vertical representativeness, the comparisons were performed qualitatively and should be interpreted with caution. The Mie simulations likewise suggest no consistent spectral dependence and that near-surface aerosol conditions may not be representative of those within atmospheric layers, which may partly contribute to the differences observed between surface and vertically resolved hygroscopicity retrievals.</p>
      <p id="d2e13981">Further investigation of the relationship between aerosol chemical composition and hygroscopicity would require the combination of remote sensing observations with real-time, vertically resolved aerosol chemical composition measurements. Furthermore, Raman lidar measurements revealed high aerosol hygroscopicity in the vicinity of clouds, suggesting that aerosol hygroscopicity may facilitate particle activation as cloud condensation nuclei under favourable thermodynamic and dynamical conditions. Additional studies using numerical weather prediction models capable of accurately reproducing both clouds and the evolution of aerosol hygroscopicity are needed.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e13988">RALMO data can be accessed through the EARLINET network (<uri>https://data.earlinet.org/earlinet/</uri>, last access: 5 November 2026), while ceilometer and Doppler wind lidar data can be obtained via the E-PROFILE network (<uri>https://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/eprofile/data/switzerland/payerne</uri>, last access: 5 November 2026). Co-author Alexander Haefele can be contacted for access to raw RALMO and radiosonde measurements (alexander.haefele@meteoswiss.ch). Sun photometer data can be retrieved from the AERONET network (<uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 5 November 2026). In situ aerosol data can be requested from co-author Benjamin T. Brem (benjamin.brem@psi.ch), while chemical composition data from the NABEL station can be accessed at <uri>https://www.bafu.admin.ch/en/data-query-nabel</uri> (last access: 5 November 2026). The HYSPLIT backward-trajectory files and corresponding maps are available for download from Zenodo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.141"><named-content content-type="pre"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23010868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.23010868</ext-link>;</named-content></xref>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e14010">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15653-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15653-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e14019">FN-G, SB and AH conceptualised the study. AD-Z, FN-G and all co-authors contributed to the analysis of the results and the discussion. AD-Z prepared the original draft of the manuscript, which was reviewed and edited by all authors. FN-G supervised the study and acquired funding.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e14025">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e14031">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e14037">This research was funded by Grant PID2024-162154OB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF/EU. This work was also supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project no. PZ00P2 168114) and the Spanish national projects (grant nos. PID2021-128008OB-I00, PID2023-151817OA-I00, CNS2023-145435), and by the Horizon Europe program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Staff Exchange Actions with the project GRASP-SYNERGY (grant agreement no. 101131631). This article is based upon work from COST Action EARLICOST (CA24135), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). The work made use of the strategic networks RED2022-134824-E and RED2024-153821-E and infrastructure (grant nos. EQC2019-006192-P and EQC2019-006423-P) funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, ATMO-ACCESS (grant agreement no. 101008004), ACTRIS-IMP (grant agreement no. 871115), and Scientific Unit of Excellence: Earth System (grant no. UCE-PP2017-02).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e14042">This research was funded by Grant PID2024-162154OB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF/EU.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e14048">This paper was edited by Markus Petters and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aksoyoglu et al.(2011)Aksoyoglu, Keller, Barmpadimos, Oderbolz, Lanz, Prévôt, and Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>Aksoyoglu, S., Keller, J., Barmpadimos, I., Oderbolz, D., Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Aerosol modelling in Europe with a focus on Switzerland during summer and winter episodes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7355–7373, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7355-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7355-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Alonso-Blanco et al.(2019)Alonso-Blanco, Gómez-Moreno, and Artíñano</label><mixed-citation>Alonso-Blanco, E., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., and Artíñano, B.: Size-resolved hygroscopicity of ambient submicron particles in a suburban Atmos, Atmos. Environ., 213, 349–358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.065</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Anderson and Ogren(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 29, 57–69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829808965551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829808965551</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Ångström(1929)</label><mixed-citation>Ångström, A.: On the Atmospheric Transmission of Sun Radiation and on Dust in the Air, Geogr. Ann.   B, 11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/519399" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/519399</ext-link>, 1929.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Ansmann et al.(1990)Ansmann, Riebesell, and Weitkamp</label><mixed-citation>Ansmann, A., Riebesell, M., and Weitkamp, C.: Measurement of atmospheric aerosol extinction profiles with a Raman lidar, Opt. Lett., 15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.15.000746" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ol.15.000746</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bader et al.(2020)Bader, Collaud Coen, Duguay-Tetzlaff, Frei, Fukutome, Gehrig, Maillard Barras, Martucci, Romanens, Scherrer, Schlegel, Spirig, Stübi, Vuilleumier, and Zubler</label><mixed-citation>Bader, S., Collaud Coen, M., Duguay-Tetzlaff, A., Frei, C., Fukutome, S., Gehrig, R., Maillard Barras, E., Martucci, G., Romanens, G., Scherrer, S., Schlegel, T., Spirig, C., Stübi, R., Vuilleumier, L., and Zubler, E.: Rapport climatologique 2019, Rapports et Bulletins 313.008.f, MeteoSwiss and OFCL, Vente des publications fédérales, CH-3303 Berne, Switzerland, ISSN 2296-1496, <uri>https://www.meteosuisse.admin.ch/services-et-publications/publications/rapports-et-bulletins/2016/2020/rapport-climatologique-2019.html</uri> (last access: 5 November 2026), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bedoya-Velásquez et al.(2018)Bedoya-Velásquez, Navas-Guzmán, Granados-Muñoz, Titos, Román, Casquero-Vera, Ortiz-Amezcua, Benavent-Oltra, Moreira, Montilla-Rosero, Hoyos, Artiñano, Coz, Olmo-Reyes, Alados-Arboledas, and Guerrero-Rascado</label><mixed-citation>Bedoya-Velásquez, A. E., Navas-Guzmán, F., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Titos, G., Román, R., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Benavent-Oltra, J. A., de Arruda Moreira, G., Montilla-Rosero, E., Hoyos, C. D., Artiñano, B., Coz, E., Olmo-Reyes, F. J., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Guerrero-Rascado, J. L.: Hygroscopic growth study in the framework of EARLINET during the SLOPE I campaign: synergy of remote sensing and in situ instrumentation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7001–7017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7001-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7001-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bedoya-Velásquez et al.(2019)Bedoya-Velásquez, Titos, Bravo-Aranda, Haeffelin, Favez, Petit, Casquero-Vera, Olmo-Reyes, Montilla-Rosero, Hoyos, Alados-Arboledas, and Guerrero-Rascado</label><mixed-citation>Bedoya-Velásquez, A. E., Titos, G., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Haeffelin, M., Favez, O., Petit, J.-E., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Olmo-Reyes, F. J., Montilla-Rosero, E., Hoyos, C. D., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Guerrero-Rascado, J. L.: Long-term aerosol optical hygroscopicity study at the ACTRIS SIRTA observatory: synergy between ceilometer and in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7883–7896, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7883-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7883-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bindoff et al.(2013)Bindoff, Stott, AchutaRao, Allen, Gillett, Gutzler, Hansingo, Hegerl, Hu, Jain, Mokhov, Overland, Perlwitz, Sebbari, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Bindoff, N. L., Stott, P., AchutaRao, K., Allen, M., Gillett, N., Gutzler, D., Hansingo, K., Hegerl, G., Hu, Y., Jain, S., Mokhov, I., Overland, J., Perlwitz, J., Sebbari, R., and Zhang, X.: IPCC 2013 AR5 – Chapter 10: Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: From Global to Regional, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis – Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013, Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA, ISBN 9781107057999, 867–952, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.022</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bohren and Huffman(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527618156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9783527618156</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Bozzetti et al.(2016)Bozzetti, Daellenbach, Hüglin, Fermo, Sciare, Kasper-Giebl, Mazar, Abbaszade, Kazzi, Gonzalez, Shuster-Meiseles, Flasch, Wolf, Křepelová, Canonaco, Schnelle-Kreis, Slowik, Zimmermann, Rudich, Baltensperger, Haddad, and Prévôt</label><mixed-citation>Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., Hüglin, C., Fermo, P., Sciare, J., Kasper-Giebl, A., Mazar, Y., Abbaszade, G., Kazzi, M. E., Gonzalez, R., Shuster-Meiseles, T., Flasch, M., Wolf, R., Křepelová, A., Canonaco, F., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Slowik, J. G., Zimmermann, R., Rudich, Y., Baltensperger, U., Haddad, I. E., and Prévôt, A. S.: Size-Resolved Identification, Characterization, and Quantification of Primary Biological Organic Aerosol at a European Rural Site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05960" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b05960</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Brocard et al.(2013)Brocard, Philipona, Haefele, Romanens, Mueller, Ruffieux, Simeonov, and Calpini</label><mixed-citation>Brocard, E., Philipona, R., Haefele, A., Romanens, G., Mueller, A., Ruffieux, D., Simeonov, V., and Calpini, B.: Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations, RALMO – Part 2: Validation of water vapor measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1347–1358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1347-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-1347-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Brunamonti et al.(2018)Brunamonti, Jorge, Oelsner, Hanumanthu, Singh, Kumar, Sonbawne, Meier, Singh, Wienhold, Luo, Boettcher, Poltera, Jauhiainen, Kayastha, Karmacharya, DIrksen, Naja, Rex, Fadnavis, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Brunamonti, S., Jorge, T., Oelsner, P., Hanumanthu, S., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Meier, S., Singh, D., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Boettcher, M., Poltera, Y., Jauhiainen, H., Kayastha, R., Karmacharya, J., Dirksen, R., Naja, M., Rex, M., Fadnavis, S., and Peter, T.: Balloon-borne measurements of temperature, water vapor, ozone and aerosol backscatter on the southern slopes of the Himalayas during StratoClim 2016–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15937–15957, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Brunamonti et al.(2021)Brunamonti, Martucci, Romanens, Poltera, Wienhold, Hervo, Haefele, and Navas-Guzmán</label><mixed-citation>Brunamonti, S., Martucci, G., Romanens, G., Poltera, Y., Wienhold, F. G., Hervo, M., Haefele, A., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Validation of aerosol backscatter profiles from Raman lidar and ceilometer using balloon-borne measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2267–2285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Bucholtz(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Bucholtz, A.: Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial Atmos, Appl. Opt., 34, 2765–2773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.34.002765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.34.002765</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Burgos et al.(2019)Burgos, Andrews, Titos, Alados-Arboledas, Baltensperger, Day, Jefferson, Kalivitis, Mihalopoulos, Sherman, Sun, Weingartner, and Zieger</label><mixed-citation>Burgos, M. A., Andrews, E., Titos, G., Alados-Arboledas, L., Baltensperger, U., Day, D., Jefferson, A., Kalivitis, N., Mihalopoulos, N., Sherman, J., Sun, J., Weingartner, E., and Zieger, P.: A global view on the effect of water uptake on aerosol particle light scattering, Sci. Data, 6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0158-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-019-0158-7</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Carrico et al.(2003)Carrico, Kus, Rood, Quinn, and Bates</label><mixed-citation>Carrico, C. M., Kus, P., Rood, M. J., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T. S.: Mixtures of pollution, dust, sea salt, and volcanic aerosol during ACE-Asia: Radiative properties as a function of relative humidity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003405</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Cavalli et al.(2010)Cavalli, Viana, Yttri, Genberg, and Putaud</label><mixed-citation>Cavalli, F., Viana, M., Yttri, K. E., Genberg, J., and Putaud, J.-P.: Toward a standardised thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 79–89, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-79-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-79-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Cedeño et al.(2023)Cedeño, Sun, Hong, and Du</label><mixed-citation>Cedeño, E., Sun, Z., Hong, Z., and Du, J.: Raman spectroscopy for profiling physical and chemical properties of atmospheric aerosol particles: A review, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114405</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Chen et al.(2019)Chen, Li, Lv, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Yan, Sun, and Cribb</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Li, Z., Lv, M., Wang, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Yan, X., Sun, Y., and Cribb, M.: Aerosol hygroscopic growth, contributing factors, and impact on haze events in a severely polluted region in northern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1327–1342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1327-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-1327-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Chen et al.(2020)Chen, Chu, Chu, Lee, Gen, Kasthuriarachchi, Chan, and Li</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Chu, Y., Chu, Y., Lee, A. K., Gen, M., Kasthuriarachchi, N. Y., Chan, C. K., and Li, Y. J.: Relative Humidity History Affects Hygroscopicity of Mixed Particles of Glyoxal and Reduced Nitrogenous Species, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00680" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c00680</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Chicco et al.(2025)Chicco, Sichenze, and Jurman</label><mixed-citation>Chicco, D., Sichenze, A., and Jurman, G.: A simple guide to the use of Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, and Kruskal-Wallis test in biostatistics, BioData Mining, 18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-025-00465-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s13040-025-00465-6</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Cirisan et al.(2014)Cirisan, Luo, Engel, Wienhold, Sprenger, Krieger, Weers, Romanens, Levrat, Jeannet, Ruffieux, Philipona, Calpini, Spichtinger, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>Cirisan, A., Luo, B. P., Engel, I., Wienhold, F. G., Sprenger, M., Krieger, U. K., Weers, U., Romanens, G., Levrat, G., Jeannet, P., Ruffieux, D., Philipona, R., Calpini, B., Spichtinger, P., and Peter, T.: Balloon-borne match measurements of midlatitude cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7341–7365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7341-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7341-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Clarke et al.(2002)Clarke, Howell, Quinn, Bates, Ogren, Andrews, Jefferson, Massling, Mayol-Bracero, Maring, Savoie, and Cass</label><mixed-citation>Clarke, A. D., Howell, S., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Jefferson, A., Massling, A., Mayol-Bracero, O., Maring, H., Savoie, D., and Cass, G.: INDOEX aerosol: A comparison and summary of chemical, microphysical, and optical properties observed from land, ship, and aircraft, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000572" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000572</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Collaud Coen et al.(2014)Collaud Coen, Praz, Haefele, Ruffieux, Kaufmann, and Calpini</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Praz, C., Haefele, A., Ruffieux, D., Kaufmann, P., and Calpini, B.: Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13205–13221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13205-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13205-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Collaud Coen et al.(2026)Collaud Coen, Brem, Gysel-Beer, Modini, Henne, Steinbacher, Putero, Gini, and Eleftheriadis</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Brem, B. T., Gysel-Beer, M., Modini, R., Henne, S., Steinbacher, M., Putero, D., Gini, M. I., and Eleftheriadis, K.: Detection and climatology of Saharan dust frequency and mass at the Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l., Switzerland), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 1623–1645, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1623-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-26-1623-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Dada et al.(2025)Dada, Brem, Amarandi-Netedu, Collaud Coen, Evangeliou, Hüglin, Nowak, Modini, Steinbacher, and Gysel-Beer</label><mixed-citation>Dada, L., Brem, B. T., Amarandi-Netedu, L.-M., Collaud Coen, M., Evangeliou, N., Hueglin, C., Nowak, N., Modini, R., Steinbacher, M., and Gysel-Beer, M.: Sources of ultrafine particles at a rural midland site in Switzerland, Aerosol Research, 3, 315–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-315-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ar-3-315-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Deshmukh et al.(2025)Deshmukh, Poulain, Wehner, Henning, Petit, Fombelle, Favez, Herrmann, and Pöhlker</label><mixed-citation>Deshmukh, S., Poulain, L., Wehner, B., Henning, S., Petit, J.-E., Fombelle, P., Favez, O., Herrmann, H., and Pöhlker, M.: External particle mixing influences hygroscopicity in a sub-urban area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 741–758, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-741-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-741-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Díaz-Zurita et al.(2025)Díaz-Zurita, Naval-Hernández, Whiteman, Rodríguez-Navarro, Muñiz-Rosado, Pérez-Ramírez, Alados-Arboledas, and Navas-Guzmán</label><mixed-citation>Díaz-Zurita, A., Naval-Hernández, V. M., Whiteman, D. N., Rodríguez-Navarro, O., Muñiz-Rosado, J., Pérez-Ramírez, D., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Sensitivity Analysis of the Differential Atmospheric Transmission in Water Vapour Mixing Ratio Retrieval from Raman Lidar Measurements, Remote Sens, 17, 3444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17203444" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs17203444</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Díaz-Zurita et al.(2026)Díaz-Zurita, Navas-Guzmán, and Pérez-Ramírez</label><mixed-citation>Díaz-Zurita, A., Navas-Guzmán, F., and Pérez-Ramírez, D.: Five-day NOAA HYSPLIT backward trajectories for hygroscopic aerosol layers over Payerne, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23010868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.23010868</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Dinoev et al.(2013)Dinoev, Simeonov, Arshinov, Bobrovnikov, Ristori, Calpini, Parlange, and Bergh</label><mixed-citation>Dinoev, T., Simeonov, V., Arshinov, Y., Bobrovnikov, S., Ristori, P., Calpini, B., Parlange, M., and van den Bergh, H.: Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations, RALMO – Part 1: Instrument description, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1329–1346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1329-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-1329-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Doane(1976)</label><mixed-citation>Doane, D. P.: Aesthetic frequency classifications, Am. Stat., 30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1976.10479172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00031305.1976.10479172</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Douville et al.(2021)Douville, Raghavan, Renwick, Allan, Arias, Barlow, Cerezo-Mota, Cherchi, Gan, Gergis, Jiang, Khan, Pokam Mba, Rosenfeld, Tierney, and Zolina</label><mixed-citation>Douville, H., Raghavan, K., Renwick, J., Allan, R., Arias, P., Barlow, M., Cerezo-Mota, R., Cherchi, A., Gan, T., Gergis, J., Jiang, D., Khan, A., Pokam Mba, W., Rosenfeld, D., Tierney, J., and Zolina, O.: Water Cycle Changes, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J., Maycock, T., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., chap. 8, pp. 1055–1210, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.010</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Durand et al.(2023)Durand, Durdina, Smallwood, Johnson, Spirig, Edebeli, Roth, Brem, Sevcenco, and Crayford</label><mixed-citation>Durand, E., Durdina, L., Smallwood, G., Johnson, M., Spirig, C., Edebeli, J., Roth, M., Brem, B., Sevcenco, Y., and Crayford, A.: Correction for particle loss in a regulatory aviation nvPM emissions system using measured particle size, J. Aerosol. Sci., 169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Eck et al.(2012)Eck, Holben, Reid, Giles, Rivas, Singh, Tripathi, Bruegge, Platnick, Arnold, Krotkov, Carn, Sinyuk, Dubovik, Arola, Schafer, Artaxo, Smirnov, Chen, and Goloub</label><mixed-citation>Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Reid, J. S., Giles, D. M., Rivas, M. A., Singh, R. P., Tripathi, S. N., Bruegge, C. J., Platnick, S., Arnold, G. T., Krotkov, N. A., Carn, S. A., Sinyuk, A., Dubovik, O., Arola, A., Schafer, J. S., Artaxo, P., Smirnov, A., Chen, H., and Goloub, P.: Fog- and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the aerosol robotic network (AERONET), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016839" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016839</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Eirund et al.(2022)Eirund, Drossaart van Dusseldorp, Brem, Dedekind, Karrer, Stoll, and Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>Eirund, G. K., Drossaart van Dusseldorp, S., Brem, B. T., Dedekind, Z., Karrer, Y., Stoll, M., and Lohmann, U.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions during a Saharan dust event–A summertime case-study from the Alps, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 148, 943–961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4240" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.4240</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>EMPA(2025)</label><mixed-citation>EMPA: Technischer Bericht zum Nationalen Beobachtungsnetz für Luftfremdstoffe (NABEL) 2025, Tech. rep., EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland, <uri>https://www.empa.ch/documents/d/s503/technischer-bericht-nabel-2025</uri> (last access: 16 October 2026), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Feingold and Morley(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Feingold, G. and Morley, B.: Aerosol hygroscopic properties as measured by lidar and comparison with in situ measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002842" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002842</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Fernández et al.(2018)Fernández, Molero, Becerril-Valle, Coz, Salvador, Artíñano, and Pujadas</label><mixed-citation>Fernández, A. J., Molero, F., Becerril-Valle, M., Coz, E., Salvador, P., Artíñano, B., and Pujadas, M.: Application of Remote Sens techniques to study aerosol water vapour uptake in a real Atmos, Atmos. Res., 202, 112–127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.11.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.11.020</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Ferrare et al.(1998)Ferrare, Melfi, Whiteman, Evans, Poellot, and Kaufman</label><mixed-citation>Ferrare, R. A., Melfi, S. H., Whiteman, D. N., Evans, K. D., Poellot, M., and Kaufman, Y. J.: Raman lidar measurements of aerosol extinction and backscattering 2. Derivation of aerosol real refractive index, single-scattering albedo, and humidification factor using Raman lidar and aircraft size distribution measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01647" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD01647</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Fierz-Schmidhauser et al.(2010)Fierz-Schmidhauser, Zieger, Gysel, Kammermann, DeCarlo, Baltensperger, and Weingartner</label><mixed-citation>Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Zieger, P., Gysel, M., Kammermann, L., DeCarlo, P. F., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Measured and predicted aerosol light scattering enhancement factors at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2319–2333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Giles et al.(2019)Giles, Sinyuk, Sorokin, Schafer, Smirnov, Slutsker, Eck, Holben, Lewis, Campbell, Welton, Korkin, and Lyapustin</label><mixed-citation>Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R., Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 169–209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Goldsmith(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Goldsmith, J. E.: Turn-key Raman lidar for profiling atmospheric water vapor, clouds, and aerosols, Appl. Opt., 37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.37.004979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.37.004979</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Granados-Muñoz et al.(2015)Granados-Muñoz, Navas-Guzmán, Bravo-Aranda, Guerrero-Rascado, Lyamani, Valenzuela, Titos, Fernández-Gálvez, and Alados-Arboledas</label><mixed-citation>Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Navas-Guzmán, F., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Lyamani, H., Valenzuela, A., Titos, G., Fernández-Gálvez, J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Hygroscopic growth of atmospheric aerosol particles based on active remote sensing and radiosounding measurements: selected cases in southeastern Spain, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 705–718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-705-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-705-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Gysel et al.(2007)Gysel, Crosier, Topping, Whitehead, Bower, Cubison, Williams, Flynn, McFiggans, and Coe</label><mixed-citation>Gysel, M., Crosier, J., Topping, D. O., Whitehead, J. D., Bower, K. N., Cubison, M. J., Williams, P. I., Flynn, M. J., McFiggans, G. B., and Coe, H.: Closure study between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6131–6144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Haefele et al.(2016)Haefele, Hervo, Turp, Lampin, Haeffelin, Lehmann et al.</label><mixed-citation>Haefele, A., Hervo, M., Turp, M., Lampin, J.-L., Haeffelin, M., Lehmann, V., the E-PROFILE team, and the TOPROF team: The E-PROFILE network for the operational measurement of wind and aerosol profiles over Europe, in: Proceedings of TECO, Madrid, Spain, <uri>https://www.eumetnet.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/E-PROFILE_TECO_Madrid_2016.pdf</uri> (last access: 5 November 2026), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Hale and Querry(1973)</label><mixed-citation>Hale, G. M. and Querry, M. R.: Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m Wavelength Region, Appl. Opt., 12, 555–563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.12.000555" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.12.000555</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Hänel(1976)</label><mixed-citation>Hänel, G.: The properties of atmospheric aerosol particles as functions of the relative humidity at thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding moist air, Adv. Geophys., 19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60142-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60142-9</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Hermann et al.(2001)Hermann, Stratmann, Wilck, and Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>Hermann, M., Stratmann, F., Wilck, M., and Wiedensohler, A.: Sampling characteristics of an aircraft-borne aerosol inlet system, J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018&lt;0007:SCOAAB&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018&lt;0007:SCOAAB&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Hicks-Jalali et al.(2020)Hicks-Jalali, Sica, Martucci, Barras, Voirin, and Haefele</label><mixed-citation>Hicks-Jalali, S., Sica, R. J., Martucci, G., Maillard Barras, E., Voirin, J., and Haefele, A.: A Raman lidar tropospheric water vapour climatology and height-resolved trend analysis over Payerne, Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9619–9640, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9619-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-9619-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Holben et al.(1998)Holben, Eck, Slutsker, Tanré, Buis, Setzer, Vermote, Reagan, Kaufman, Nakajima, Lavenu, Jankowiak, and Smirnov</label><mixed-citation>Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Hüglin and Grange(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Hüglin, C. and Grange, S. K.: Chemical Characterisation and Source Identification of PM10 and PM2.5 in Switzerland, Project report, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland, <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.bafu.admin.ch/dam/en/sd-web/oyMXRQizcq24/chemical-characterisation-and-source-identification-of-pm-in-switzerland.pdf">https://www.bafu.admin.ch/dam/en/sd-web/oyMXRQizcq24</ext-link> (last access: 5 November 2026), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Hüglin and Schwarzenbach(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Hüglin, C. and Schwarzenbach, B.: Feinstaubmessungen (PM10 und PM2.5) mit dem Fidas 200 der Firma Palas im NABEL, Tech. rep., Empa, Abteilung für Luftfremdstoffe und Umwelttechnik, <uri>https://www.empa.ch/documents/56101/246436/Fidas_200_NABEL.pdf/93790947-135a-4575-a718-370316f506c5</uri> (last access: 5 November 2026), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Hüglin et al.(2024)Hüglin, Buchmann, Steinbacher, and Emmenegger</label><mixed-citation>Hüglin, C., Buchmann, B., Steinbacher, M., and Emmenegger, L.: The Swiss National Air Pollution Monitoring Network (NABEL) – Bridging Science and Environmental Policy, Chimia, 78, 722–727, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2024.722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2533/chimia.2024.722</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Jefferson et al.(2017)Jefferson, Hageman, Morrow, Mei, and Watson</label><mixed-citation>Jefferson, A., Hageman, D., Morrow, H., Mei, F., and Watson, T.: Seven years of aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth measurements from SGP: Factors influencing water uptake, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026804" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026804</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Jing et al.(2026)Jing, He, Yin, Müller, Huang, and Yi</label><mixed-citation>Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Müller, D., Huang, K., and Yi, F.: Hygroscopic growth characteristics of anthropogenic aerosols over central China revealed by lidar observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 389–403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-389-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-19-389-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Jones et al.(2021)Jones, Hill, Remy, Abraham, Dalvi, Hardacre, Hewitt, Johnson, Mulcahy, and Turnock</label><mixed-citation>Jones, A. C., Hill, A., Remy, S., Abraham, N. L., Dalvi, M., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Johnson, B., Mulcahy, J. P., and Turnock, S. T.: Exploring the sensitivity of atmospheric nitrate concentrations to nitric acid uptake rate using the Met Office's Unified Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15901–15927, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Kammermann et al.(2010)Kammermann, Gysel, Weingartner, and Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>Kammermann, L., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: 13-month climatology of the aerosol hygroscopicity at the free tropospheric site Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10717–10732, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10717-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10717-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Keller et al.(2023)Keller, Specht, Steigmeier, and Weingartner</label><mixed-citation>Keller, A., Specht, P., Steigmeier, P., and Weingartner, E.: A novel measurement system for unattended, in situ characterization of carbonaceous aerosols, Aerosol Research, 1, 65–79, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-1-65-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ar-1-65-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Klett(1981)</label><mixed-citation>Klett, J. D.: Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns, Appl. Opt., 20, 211–220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.20.000211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.20.000211</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Klett(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Klett, J. D.: Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios, Appl. Opt., 24, 1638–1643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.24.001638" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.24.001638</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Laly et al.(2025)Laly, Chazette, Totems, Crenn, Ledur, and Marpillat</label><mixed-citation>Laly, F., Chazette, P., Totems, J., Crenn, V., Ledur, D., and Marpillat, A.: How does humidity affect lidar-derived aerosol optical properties, and how do they compare with CAMS?, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 7629–7649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7629-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-7629-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Li et al.(2025)Li, Li, Fan, Chen, Lin, Hou, Zhang, Zheng, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>Li, L., Li, M., Fan, X., Chen, Y., Lin, Z., Hou, A., Zhang, S., Zheng, R., and Chen, J.: Measurement report: The variation properties of aerosol hygroscopic growth related to chemical composition during new particle formation days in a coastal city of Southeast China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3669–3685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3669-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-3669-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>List(1951)</label><mixed-citation>List, R. J.: Smithsonian Meteorological Tables, vol. 114 of <italic>Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections</italic>, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 6th revised edn.,  <uri>https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/23746</uri> (last access: 5 November 2026), 1951.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Liu et al.(2018)Liu, Tan, Fan, Cai, Xu, Li, and Chan</label><mixed-citation>Liu, L., Tan, H., Fan, S., Cai, M., Xu, H., Li, F., and Chan, P.: Influence of aerosol hygroscopicity and mixing state on aerosol optical properties in the Pearl River Delta region, China, Sci. Total Environ., 627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.199" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.199</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Liu and Daum(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y. and Daum, P. H.: Relationship of refractive index to mass density and self-consistency of mixing rules for multicomponent mixtures like ambient aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.06.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.06.006</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Liu et al.(2021)Liu, Feng, Zheng, Bao, Liu, Ge, Zhao, Jiang, Liao, Zhang, Fan, Yan, Chu, Wang, Du, Cai, Bianchi, Petäjä, Mu, He, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Feng, Z., Zheng, F., Bao, X., Liu, P., Ge, Y., Zhao, Y., Jiang, T., Liao, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, X., Yan, C., Chu, B., Wang, Y., Du, W., Cai, J., Bianchi, F., Petäjä, T., Mu, Y., He, H., and Kulmala, M.: Ammonium nitrate promotes sulfate formation through uptake kinetic regime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13269–13286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13269-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-13269-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Lorenzo et al.(2025)Lorenzo, Ziemba, Arellano, Barth, Crosbie, DiGangi, Diskin, Ferrare, Hilario, Shook, Tilmes, Wang, Xiao, Zhang, and Sorooshian</label><mixed-citation>Lorenzo, G. R., Ziemba, L. D., Arellano, A. F., Barth, M. C., Crosbie, E. C., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G. S., Ferrare, R., Hilario, M. R. A., Shook, M. A., Tilmes, S., Wang, J., Xiao, Q., Zhang, J., and Sorooshian, A.: Measurement report: Characterization of aerosol hygroscopicity over Southeast Asia during the NASA CAMP<sup>2</sup>Ex campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5469–5495, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5469-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-5469-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Lv et al.(2017)Lv, Liu, Li, Mao, Sun, Wang, Wang, and Xie</label><mixed-citation>Lv, M., Liu, D., Li, Z., Mao, J., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., and Xie, C.: Hygroscopic growth of atmospheric aerosol particles based on lidar, radiosonde, and in situ measurements: Case studies from the Xinzhou field campaign, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.12.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.12.029</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Martucci et al.(2018)Martucci, Voirin, Simeonov, Renaud, and Haefele</label><mixed-citation>Martucci, G., Voirin, J., Simeonov, V., Renaud, L., and Haefele, A.: A novel automatic calibration system for water vapor Raman LIDAR, in: EPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 176, p. 05008, EDP Sciences, ISSN 2100014X, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817605008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/epjconf/201817605008</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Martucci et al.(2021)Martucci, Navas-Guzmán, Renaud, Romanens, Gamage, Hervo, Jeannet, and Haefele</label><mixed-citation>Martucci, G., Navas-Guzmán, F., Renaud, L., Romanens, G., Gamage, S. M., Hervo, M., Jeannet, P., and Haefele, A.: Validation of pure rotational Raman temperature data from the Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) at Payerne, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1333–1353, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1333-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-1333-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>MeteoSwiss(2026a)</label><mixed-citation>MeteoSwiss: Air Pressure and Anticyclone Overview, <uri>https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/weather/weather-and-climate-from-a-to-z/anticyclone-high-pressure.html</uri> (last access: 12 January 2026), 2026a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>MeteoSwiss(2026b)</label><mixed-citation>MeteoSwiss: Air Pressure and Anticyclone Overview, <uri>https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/weather/weather-and-climate-from-a-to-z/low-pressure-situation.html</uri> (last access: 12 January 2026), 2026b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Minguillón et al.(2012)Minguillón, Querol, Baltensperger, and Prévôt</label><mixed-citation>Minguillón, M. C., Querol, X., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S.: Fine and coarse PM composition and sources in rural and urban sites in Switzerland: Local or regional pollution?, Sci. Total Environ., 427-428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.030</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Miri et al.(2024)Miri, Pujol, Hu, Goloub, Veselovskii, Podvin, and Ducos</label><mixed-citation>Miri, R., Pujol, O., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Veselovskii, I., Podvin, T., and Ducos, F.: Innovative aerosol hygroscopic growth study from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar and microwave radiometer synergy, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3367–3375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Mouton et al.(2023)Mouton, Malek, James, Pokhrel, Fiddler, Asa-Awuku, and Bililign</label><mixed-citation>Mouton, M., Malek, K. A., James, M. H., Pokhrel, R. P., Fiddler, M. N., Asa-Awuku, A. A., and Bililign, S.: The hygroscopic properties of biomass burning aerosol from Eucalyptus and cow dung under different combustion conditions, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 57, 665–677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2198587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2023.2198587</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Müller et al.(2011)Müller, Laborde, Kassell, and Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Laborde, M., Kassell, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: Design and performance of a three-wavelength LED-based total scatter and backscatter integrating nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1291–1303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Navas-Guzmán et al.(2014)Navas-Guzmán, Fernández-Gálvez, Granados-Muñoz, Guerrero-Rascado, Bravo-Aranda, and Alados-Arboledas</label><mixed-citation>Navas-Guzmán, F., Fernández-Gálvez, J., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Tropospheric water vapour and relative humidity profiles from lidar and microwave radiometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1201–1211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1201-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-1201-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Navas-Guzmán et al.(2016)Navas-Guzmán, Kämpfer, and Haefele</label><mixed-citation>Navas-Guzmán, F., Kämpfer, N., and Haefele, A.: Validation of brightness and physical temperature from two scanning microwave radiometers in the 60 GHz O2 band using radiosonde measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4587–4600, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4587-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-4587-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Navas-Guzmán et al.(2019)Navas-Guzmán, Martucci, Coen, Granados-Muñoz, Hervo, Sicard, and Haefele</label><mixed-citation>Navas-Guzmán, F., Martucci, G., Collaud Coen, M., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Hervo, M., Sicard, M., and Haefele, A.: Characterization of aerosol hygroscopicity using Raman lidar measurements at the EARLINET station of Payerne, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11651–11668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11651-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11651-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Nowak(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Nowak, D.: Radiation and clouds: observations and model calculations for Payerne BSRN site, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005694186" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3929/ethz-a-005694186</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Nowak et al.(2023–2025)Nowak, Brem, Gysel-Beer, and Simon</label><mixed-citation>Nowak, N., Brem, B., Gysel-Beer, M., and Simon, L.: Inorganics in air and particle phase at Payerne, EBAS at NILU, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48597/HB8T-9C9B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48597/HB8T-9C9B</ext-link>, 2023–2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Pariyothon et al.(2023)Pariyothon, Bualert, Choomanee, Rungratanaubon, Thongyen, Fakkaew, Phuetfoo, Phupijit, and Szymanski</label><mixed-citation>Pariyothon, J., Bualert, S., Choomanee, P., Rungratanaubon, T., Thongyen, T., Fakkaew, N., Phuetfoo, C., Phupijit, J., and Szymanski, W. W.: Hygroscopic Growth Factors of Sub-micrometer Atmospheric Aerosols at Four Selected Sites in Thailand, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.220374</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Petzold et al.(2013)Petzold, Ogren, Fiebig, Laj, Li, Baltensperger, Holzer-Popp, Kinne, Pappalardo, Sugimoto, Wehrli, Wiedensohler, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting ”black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Pérez-Ramírez et al.(2021)Pérez-Ramírez, Whiteman, Veselovskii, Ferrare, Titos, Granados-Muñoz, Sanchez-Hernandez, and Navas-Guzman</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Ramírez, D., Whiteman, D. N., Veselovskii, I., Ferrare, R., Titos, G., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Sánchez-Hernández, G., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Spatiotemporal changes in aerosol properties by hygroscopic growth and impacts on radiative forcing and heating rates during DISCOVER-AQ 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12021–12048, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Prahl(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Prahl, S.: miepython: Pure Python calculation of Mie scattering, Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7949264" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7949264</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Rolph et al.(2017)Rolph, Stein, and Stunder</label><mixed-citation>Rolph, G., Stein, A., and Stunder, B.: Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem: READY, Environ. Model Softw., 95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Rosen and Kjome(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Rosen, J. M. and Kjome, N. T.: Backscattersonde: a new instrument for atmospheric Aerosol Res, Appl. Opt., 30, 1552–1561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.30.001552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.30.001552</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Rovira et al.(2025)Rovira, Savadkoohi, Chen, Močnik, Aas, Alados-Arboledas, Artiñano, Aurela, Backman, Banerji, Beddow, Brem, Chazeau, Coen, Colombi, Conil, Costabile, Coz, de Brito, Eleftheriadis, Favez, Flentje, Freney, Gregorič, Gysel-Beer, Harrison, Hüglin, Hyvärinen, Ivančič, Kalogridis, Keernik, Konstantinos, Laj, Liakakou, Lin, Listrani, Luoma, Maasikmets, Manninen, Marchand, dos Santos, Mbengue, Mihalopoulos, Nicolae, Niemi, Norman, Ovadnevaite, Petit, Platt, Prévôt, Pujadas, Putaud, Riffault, Rigler, Rinaldi, Schwarz, Silvergren, Teinemaa, Teinilä, Timonen, Titos, Tobler, Vasilescu, Vratolis, Yttri, Yubero, Zíková, Alastuey, Petäjä, Querol, Yus-Díez, and Pandolfi</label><mixed-citation>Rovira, J., Savadkoohi, M., Chen, G. I., Močnik, G., Aas, W., Alados-Arboledas, L., Artiñano, B., Aurela, M., Backman, J., Banerji, S., Beddow, D., Brem, B., Chazeau, B., Coen, M. C., Colombi, C., Conil, S., Costabile, F., Coz, E., de Brito, J. F., Eleftheriadis, K., Favez, O., Flentje, H., Freney, E., Gregorič, A., Gysel-Beer, M., Harrison, R., Hüglin, C., Hyvärinen, A., Ivančič, M., Kalogridis, A. C., Keernik, H., Konstantinos, G., Laj, P., Liakakou, E., Lin, C., Listrani, S., Luoma, K., Maasikmets, M., Manninen, H. E., Marchand, N., dos Santos, S. M., Mbengue, S., Mihalopoulos, N., Nicolae, D., Niemi, J. V., Norman, M., Ovadnevaite, J., Petit, J. E., Platt, S., Prévôt, A. S., Pujadas, M., Putaud, J. P., Riffault, V., Rigler, M., Rinaldi, M., Schwarz, J., Silvergren, S., Teinemaa, E., Teinilä, K., Timonen, H., Titos, G., Tobler, A., Vasilescu, J., Vratolis, S., Yttri, K. E., Yubero, E., Zíková, N., Alastuey, A., Petäjä, T., Querol, X., Yus-Díez, J., and Pandolfi, M.: A European aerosol phenomenology – 9: Light absorption properties of carbonaceous aerosol particles across surface Europe, Environ. Int., 195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2024.109185</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Rubia(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Rubia, J. M. D. L.: Rice University Rule to Determine the Number of Bins, Open J. Stat., 14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2024.141006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4236/ojs.2024.141006</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Schafer et al.(2008)Schafer, Eck, Holben, Artaxo, and Duarte</label><mixed-citation>Schafer, J. S., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Artaxo, P., and Duarte, A. F.: Characterization of the optical properties of atmospheric aerosols in Amazônia from long-term AERONET monitoring (1993–1995 and 1999–2006), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009319" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009319</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Scott(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Scott, D. W.: Scott's rule, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wics.103</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Seinfeld et al.(2016)Seinfeld, Bretherton, Carslaw, Coe, DeMott, Dunlea, Feingold, Ghan, Guenther, Kahn, Kraucunas, Kreidenweis, Molina, Nenes, Penner, Prather, Ramanathan, Ramaswamy, Rasch, Ravishankara, Rosenfeld, Stephens, and Wood</label><mixed-citation>Seinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J., Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S., Guenther, A. B., Kahn, R., Kraucunas, I., Kreidenweis, S. M., Molina, M. J., Nenes, A., Penner, J. E., Prather, K. A., Ramanathan, V., Ramaswamy, V., Rasch, P. J., Ravishankara, A. R., Rosenfeld, D., Stephens, G., and Wood, R.: Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol-cloud interactions in the climate system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514043113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1514043113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Sicard et al.(2022)Sicard, Oliveira, Muñoz-Porcar, Gil-Díaz, Comerón, Rodríguez-Gómez, and Otín</label><mixed-citation>Sicard, M., Fortunato dos Santos Oliveira, D. C., Muñoz-Porcar, C., Gil-Díaz, C., Comerón, A., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., and Dios Otín, F.: Measurement report: Spectral and statistical analysis of aerosol hygroscopic growth from multi-wavelength lidar measurements in Barcelona, Spain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7681–7697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7681-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-7681-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Stein et al.(2015)Stein, Draxler, Rolph, Stunder, Cohen, and Ngan</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: Noaa's hysplit atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Swietlicki et al.(2008)Swietlicki, Hansson, Hämeri, Svenningsson, Massling, Mcfiggans, Mcmurry, Petäjä, Tunved, Gysel, Topping, Weingartner, Baltensperger, Rissler, Wiedensohler, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>Swietlicki, E., Hansson, H. C., Hämeri, K., Svenningsson, B., Massling, A., Mcfiggans, G., Mcmurry, P. H., Petäjä, T., Tunved, P., Gysel, M., Topping, D., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Rissler, J., Wiedensohler, A., and Kulmala, M.: Hygroscopic properties of submicrometer atmospheric aerosol particles measured with H-TDMA instruments in various environments – A review, Tellus B, 60 B, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Titos et al.(2014a)Titos, Jefferson, Sheridan, Andrews, Lyamani, Alados-Arboledas, and Ogren</label><mixed-citation>Titos, G., Jefferson, A., Sheridan, P. J., Andrews, E., Lyamani, H., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Ogren, J. A.: Aerosol light-scattering enhancement due to water uptake during the TCAP campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7031–7043, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7031-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7031-2014</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Titos et al.(2014b)Titos, Lyamani, Cazorla, Sorribas, Foyo-Moreno, Wiedensohler, and Alados-Arboledas</label><mixed-citation>Titos, G., Lyamani, H., Cazorla, A., Sorribas, M., Foyo-Moreno, I., Wiedensohler, A., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Study of the relative humidity dependence of aerosol light-scattering in southern Spain, Tellus B, 66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.24536" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v66.24536</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Titos et al.(2016)Titos, Cazorla, Zieger, Andrews, Lyamani, Granados-Muñoz, Olmo, and Alados-Arboledas</label><mixed-citation>Titos, G., Cazorla, A., Zieger, P., Andrews, E., Lyamani, H., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Olmo, F. J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Effect of hygroscopic growth on the aerosol light-scattering coefficient: A review of measurements, techniques and error sources, J. Atmos. Environ., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Titos et al.(2021)Titos, Burgos, Zieger, Alados-Arboledas, Baltensperger, Jefferson, Sherman, Weingartner, Henzing, Luoma, O'Dowd, Wiedensohler, and Andrews</label><mixed-citation>Titos, G., Burgos, M. A., Zieger, P., Alados-Arboledas, L., Baltensperger, U., Jefferson, A., Sherman, J., Weingartner, E., Henzing, B., Luoma, K., O'Dowd, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Andrews, E.: A global study of hygroscopicity-driven light-scattering enhancement in the context of other in situ aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13031–13050, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Vaisala(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Vaisala: Vaisala Radiosonde RS41 Measurement Performance, Tech. rep., Vaisala, Helsinki, Finland, <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.vaisala.com/sites/default/files/documents/WEA-MET-RS41-Performance-White-paper-B211356EN-B-LOW-v3.pdf">https://www.vaisala.com/sites/default/files/documents/WEA-MET-RS41-Performance-White-paper</ext-link> (last access: 5 November 2026), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Vernier et al.(2015)Vernier, Fairlie, Natarajan, Wienhold, Bian, Martinsson, Crumeyrolle, Thomason, and Bedka</label><mixed-citation>Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J., Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.: Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and its potential connection with Asian pollution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 1609–1619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022372</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2009)Veselovskii, Whiteman, Kolgotin, Andrews, and Korenskii</label><mixed-citation>Veselovskii, I., Whiteman, D. N., Kolgotin, A., Andrews, E., and Korenskii, M.: Demonstration of aerosol property profiling by multiwavelength lidar under varying relative humidity conditions, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 26, 1543–1557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1254.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JTECHA1254.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2013)Veselovskii, Whiteman, Korenskiy, Kolgotin, Dubovik, Perez-Ramirez, and Suvorina</label><mixed-citation>Veselovskii, I., Whiteman, D. N., Korenskiy, M., Kolgotin, A., Dubovik, O., Perez-Ramirez, D., and Suvorina, A.: Retrieval of spatio-temporal distributions of particle parameters from multiwavelength lidar measurements using the linear estimation technique and comparison with AERONET, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2671–2682, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2671-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2671-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2015)Veselovskii, Whiteman, Korenskiy, Suvorina, and Perez-Ramirez</label><mixed-citation>Veselovskii, I., Whiteman, D. N., Korenskiy, M., Suvorina, A., and Pérez-Ramírez, D.: Use of rotational Raman measurements in multiwavelength aerosol lidar for evaluation of particle backscattering and extinction, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4111–4122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4111-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-4111-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2025)Veselovskii, Hu, Goloub, Podvin, Dubois, Kolgotin, and Korenskii</label><mixed-citation>Veselovskii, I., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Podvin, T., Dubois, G., Kolgotin, A., and Korenskii, M.: Impact of water uptake on fluorescence of atmospheric aerosols: insights from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6039–6051, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6039-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-6039-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Whiteman(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Whiteman, D. N.: Examination of the traditional Raman lidar technique I Evaluating the temperature-dependent lidar equations, Appl. Opt., 42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.42.002571" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.42.002571</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Whiteman et al.(1992)Whiteman, Melfi, and Ferrare</label><mixed-citation>Whiteman, D. N., Melfi, S. H., and Ferrare, R. A.: Raman lidar system for the measurement of water vapor and aerosols in the Earth’s Atmos, Appl. Opt., 31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.31.003068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.31.003068</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Whiteman et al.(2006)Whiteman, Demoz, Girolamo, Comer, Veselovskii, Evans, Wang, Cadirola, Rush, Schwemmer, Gentry, Melfi, Mielke, Venable, and van Hove</label><mixed-citation>Whiteman, D. N., Demoz, B., Girolamo, P. D., Comer, J., Veselovskii, I., Evans, K., Wang, Z., Cadirola, M., Rush, K., Schwemmer, G., Gentry, B., Melfi, S. H., Mielke, B., Venable, D., and van Hove, T.: Raman lidar measurements during the International H2O Project. Part I: Instrumentation and analysis techniques, J. Atmos. Ocean Technol., 23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1838.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH1838.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>WMO(2008)</label><mixed-citation>WMO: Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, WMO-No. 8, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 7th edn., <uri>https://www.weather.gov/media/epz/mesonet/CWOP-WMO8.pdf</uri> (last access: 5 November 2026), 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Wulfmeyer and Feingold(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Wulfmeyer, V. and Feingold, G.: On the relationship between relative humidity and particle backscattering coefficient in the marine boundary layer determined with differential absorption lidar, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999jd901030</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Yau and Rogers(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Yau, M. K. and Rogers, R. R.: A short course in cloud physics, Elsevier, 3rd edn., <uri>https://shop.elsevier.com/books/a-short-course-in-cloud-physics/yau/978-0-08-057094-5</uri> (last access: 5 November 2026), 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Yuan and Zhao(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Yuan, L. and Zhao, C.: Quantifying particle-to-particle heterogeneity in aerosol hygroscopicity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3195–3205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3195-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-3195-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Zanatta et al.(2016)Zanatta, Gysel, Bukowiecki, Müller, Weingartner, Areskoug, Fiebig, Yttri, Mihalopoulos, Kouvarakis, Beddows, Harrison, Cavalli, Putaud, Spindler, Wiedensohler, Alastuey, Pandolfi, Sellegri, Swietlicki, Jaffrezo, Baltensperger, and Laj</label><mixed-citation>Zanatta, M., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Müller, T., Weingartner, E., Areskoug, H., Fiebig, M., Yttri, K. E., Mihalopoulos, N., Kouvarakis, G., Beddows, D., Harrison, R. M., Cavalli, F., Putaud, J. P., Spindler, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A., Pandolfi, M., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Jaffrezo, J. L., Baltensperger, U., and Laj, P.: A European aerosol phenomenology-5: Climatology of black carbon optical properties at 9 regional background sites across Europe, Atmos. Environ., 145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Zhang et al.(2025)Zhang, Wang, Xu, Zuo, Lu, Zhu, Yang, Yan, and Sun</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Xu, J., Zuo, X., Lu, C., Zhu, B., Yang, Y., Yan, X., and Sun, Y.: Measurement report: Size-resolved and seasonal variations in aerosol hygroscopicity dominated by organic formation and aging: insights from a year-long observation in Nanjing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 17413–17428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17413-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-17413-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Zieger et al.(2013)Zieger, Fierz-Schmidhauser, Weingartner, and Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10609–10631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Zieger et al.(2014)Zieger, Fierz-Schmidhauser, Poulain, Müller, Birmili, Spindler, Wiedensohler, Baltensperger, and Weingartner</label><mixed-citation>Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Poulain, L., Müller, T., Birmili, W., Spindler, G., Wiedensohler, A., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Influence of water uptake on the aerosol particle light scattering coefficients of the Central European aerosol, Tellus B, 66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22716" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v66.22716</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Characterisation of hygroscopic aerosol processes using remote sensing and in situ techniques at the MeteoSwiss Payerne station</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Aksoyoglu et al.(2011)Aksoyoglu, Keller, Barmpadimos, Oderbolz, Lanz,
Prévôt, and Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aksoyoglu, S., Keller, J., Barmpadimos, I., Oderbolz, D., Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Baltensperger, U.: Aerosol modelling in Europe with a focus on Switzerland during summer and winter episodes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7355–7373, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7355-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7355-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Alonso-Blanco et al.(2019)Alonso-Blanco, Gómez-Moreno, and
Artíñano</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alonso-Blanco, E., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., and Artíñano, B.: Size-resolved
hygroscopicity of ambient submicron particles in a suburban Atmos, Atmos.
Environ., 213, 349–358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.065</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Anderson and Ogren(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, T. L. and Ogren, J. A.: Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties
Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 29,
57–69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829808965551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829808965551</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Ångström(1929)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ångström, A.: On the Atmospheric Transmission of Sun Radiation and on Dust in
the Air, Geogr. Ann.   B, 11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/519399" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/519399</a>, 1929.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Ansmann et al.(1990)Ansmann, Riebesell, and Weitkamp</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ansmann, A., Riebesell, M., and Weitkamp, C.: Measurement of atmospheric
aerosol extinction profiles with a Raman lidar, Opt. Lett., 15,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.15.000746" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.15.000746</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bader et al.(2020)Bader, Collaud Coen, Duguay-Tetzlaff, Frei,
Fukutome, Gehrig, Maillard Barras, Martucci, Romanens, Scherrer, Schlegel,
Spirig, Stübi, Vuilleumier, and Zubler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bader, S., Collaud Coen, M., Duguay-Tetzlaff, A., Frei, C., Fukutome, S.,
Gehrig, R., Maillard Barras, E., Martucci, G., Romanens, G., Scherrer, S.,
Schlegel, T., Spirig, C., Stübi, R., Vuilleumier, L., and Zubler, E.:
Rapport climatologique 2019, Rapports et Bulletins 313.008.f, MeteoSwiss and
OFCL, Vente des publications fédérales, CH-3303 Berne, Switzerland, ISSN
2296-1496,
<a href="https://www.meteosuisse.admin.ch/services-et-publications/publications/rapports-et-bulletins/2016/2020/rapport-climatologique-2019.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 November 2026),
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bedoya-Velásquez et al.(2018)Bedoya-Velásquez, Navas-Guzmán,
Granados-Muñoz, Titos, Román, Casquero-Vera, Ortiz-Amezcua, Benavent-Oltra,
Moreira, Montilla-Rosero, Hoyos, Artiñano, Coz, Olmo-Reyes,
Alados-Arboledas, and Guerrero-Rascado</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bedoya-Velásquez, A. E., Navas-Guzmán, F., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Titos, G., Román, R., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Benavent-Oltra, J. A., de Arruda Moreira, G., Montilla-Rosero, E., Hoyos, C. D., Artiñano, B., Coz, E., Olmo-Reyes, F. J., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Guerrero-Rascado, J. L.: Hygroscopic growth study in the framework of EARLINET during the SLOPE I campaign: synergy of remote sensing and in situ instrumentation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7001–7017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7001-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7001-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bedoya-Velásquez et al.(2019)Bedoya-Velásquez, Titos, Bravo-Aranda,
Haeffelin, Favez, Petit, Casquero-Vera, Olmo-Reyes, Montilla-Rosero, Hoyos,
Alados-Arboledas, and Guerrero-Rascado</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bedoya-Velásquez, A. E., Titos, G., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Haeffelin, M., Favez, O., Petit, J.-E., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Olmo-Reyes, F. J., Montilla-Rosero, E., Hoyos, C. D., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Guerrero-Rascado, J. L.: Long-term aerosol optical hygroscopicity study at the ACTRIS SIRTA observatory: synergy between ceilometer and in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7883–7896, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7883-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7883-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bindoff et al.(2013)Bindoff, Stott, AchutaRao, Allen, Gillett,
Gutzler, Hansingo, Hegerl, Hu, Jain, Mokhov, Overland, Perlwitz, Sebbari, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bindoff, N. L., Stott, P., AchutaRao, K., Allen, M., Gillett, N., Gutzler, D.,
Hansingo, K., Hegerl, G., Hu, Y., Jain, S., Mokhov, I., Overland, J.,
Perlwitz, J., Sebbari, R., and Zhang, X.: IPCC 2013 AR5 – Chapter 10:
Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: From Global to Regional, Climate
Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis – Working Group I Contribution to the
Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
2013, Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor,
M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P.
M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA,
ISBN 9781107057999, 867–952, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.022</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bohren and Huffman(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small
Particles, Wiley, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527618156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527618156</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Bozzetti et al.(2016)Bozzetti, Daellenbach, Hüglin, Fermo, Sciare,
Kasper-Giebl, Mazar, Abbaszade, Kazzi, Gonzalez, Shuster-Meiseles, Flasch,
Wolf, Křepelová, Canonaco, Schnelle-Kreis, Slowik, Zimmermann, Rudich,
Baltensperger, Haddad, and Prévôt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bozzetti, C., Daellenbach, K. R., Hüglin, C., Fermo, P., Sciare, J.,
Kasper-Giebl, A., Mazar, Y., Abbaszade, G., Kazzi, M. E., Gonzalez, R.,
Shuster-Meiseles, T., Flasch, M., Wolf, R., Křepelová, A., Canonaco, F.,
Schnelle-Kreis, J., Slowik, J. G., Zimmermann, R., Rudich, Y., Baltensperger,
U., Haddad, I. E., and Prévôt, A. S.: Size-Resolved Identification,
Characterization, and Quantification of Primary Biological Organic Aerosol at
a European Rural Site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05960" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05960</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Brocard et al.(2013)Brocard, Philipona, Haefele, Romanens, Mueller,
Ruffieux, Simeonov, and Calpini</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brocard, E., Philipona, R., Haefele, A., Romanens, G., Mueller, A., Ruffieux, D., Simeonov, V., and Calpini, B.: Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations, RALMO – Part 2: Validation of water vapor measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1347–1358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1347-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1347-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Brunamonti et al.(2018)Brunamonti, Jorge, Oelsner, Hanumanthu, Singh,
Kumar, Sonbawne, Meier, Singh, Wienhold, Luo, Boettcher, Poltera, Jauhiainen,
Kayastha, Karmacharya, DIrksen, Naja, Rex, Fadnavis, and
Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brunamonti, S., Jorge, T., Oelsner, P., Hanumanthu, S., Singh, B. B., Kumar, K. R., Sonbawne, S., Meier, S., Singh, D., Wienhold, F. G., Luo, B. P., Boettcher, M., Poltera, Y., Jauhiainen, H., Kayastha, R., Karmacharya, J., Dirksen, R., Naja, M., Rex, M., Fadnavis, S., and Peter, T.: Balloon-borne measurements of temperature, water vapor, ozone and aerosol backscatter on the southern slopes of the Himalayas during StratoClim 2016–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15937–15957, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15937-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Brunamonti et al.(2021)Brunamonti, Martucci, Romanens, Poltera,
Wienhold, Hervo, Haefele, and Navas-Guzmán</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brunamonti, S., Martucci, G., Romanens, G., Poltera, Y., Wienhold, F. G., Hervo, M., Haefele, A., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Validation of aerosol backscatter profiles from Raman lidar and ceilometer using balloon-borne measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2267–2285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2267-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Bucholtz(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bucholtz, A.: Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial Atmos, Appl.
Opt., 34, 2765–2773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.34.002765" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.34.002765</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Burgos et al.(2019)Burgos, Andrews, Titos, Alados-Arboledas,
Baltensperger, Day, Jefferson, Kalivitis, Mihalopoulos, Sherman, Sun,
Weingartner, and Zieger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burgos, M. A., Andrews, E., Titos, G., Alados-Arboledas, L., Baltensperger, U.,
Day, D., Jefferson, A., Kalivitis, N., Mihalopoulos, N., Sherman, J., Sun,
J., Weingartner, E., and Zieger, P.: A global view on the effect of water
uptake on aerosol particle light scattering, Sci. Data, 6,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0158-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0158-7</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Carrico et al.(2003)Carrico, Kus, Rood, Quinn, and
Bates</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carrico, C. M., Kus, P., Rood, M. J., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T. S.: Mixtures
of pollution, dust, sea salt, and volcanic aerosol during ACE-Asia: Radiative
properties as a function of relative humidity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003405" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003405</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Cavalli et al.(2010)Cavalli, Viana, Yttri, Genberg, and
Putaud</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cavalli, F., Viana, M., Yttri, K. E., Genberg, J., and Putaud, J.-P.: Toward a standardised thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 79–89, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-79-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-79-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Cedeño et al.(2023)Cedeño, Sun, Hong, and Du</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cedeño, E., Sun, Z., Hong, Z., and Du, J.: Raman spectroscopy for profiling
physical and chemical properties of atmospheric aerosol particles: A review,
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114405" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114405</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Chen et al.(2019)Chen, Li, Lv, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Yan, Sun, and
Cribb</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, J., Li, Z., Lv, M., Wang, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Yan, X., Sun, Y., and Cribb, M.: Aerosol hygroscopic growth, contributing factors, and impact on haze events in a severely polluted region in northern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1327–1342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1327-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1327-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Chen et al.(2020)Chen, Chu, Chu, Lee, Gen, Kasthuriarachchi, Chan,
and Li</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, X., Chu, Y., Chu, Y., Lee, A. K., Gen, M., Kasthuriarachchi, N. Y., Chan,
C. K., and Li, Y. J.: Relative Humidity History Affects Hygroscopicity of
Mixed Particles of Glyoxal and Reduced Nitrogenous Species, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00680" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00680</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Chicco et al.(2025)Chicco, Sichenze, and Jurman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chicco, D., Sichenze, A., and Jurman, G.: A simple guide to the use of
Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, and
Kruskal-Wallis test in biostatistics, BioData Mining, 18,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-025-00465-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-025-00465-6</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Cirisan et al.(2014)Cirisan, Luo, Engel, Wienhold, Sprenger, Krieger,
Weers, Romanens, Levrat, Jeannet, Ruffieux, Philipona, Calpini, Spichtinger,
and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cirisan, A., Luo, B. P., Engel, I., Wienhold, F. G., Sprenger, M., Krieger, U. K., Weers, U., Romanens, G., Levrat, G., Jeannet, P., Ruffieux, D., Philipona, R., Calpini, B., Spichtinger, P., and Peter, T.: Balloon-borne match measurements of midlatitude cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7341–7365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7341-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7341-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Clarke et al.(2002)Clarke, Howell, Quinn, Bates, Ogren, Andrews,
Jefferson, Massling, Mayol-Bracero, Maring, Savoie, and Cass</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clarke, A. D., Howell, S., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Ogren, J. A., Andrews,
E., Jefferson, A., Massling, A., Mayol-Bracero, O., Maring, H., Savoie, D.,
and Cass, G.: INDOEX aerosol: A comparison and summary of chemical,
microphysical, and optical properties observed from land, ship, and aircraft,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000572" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000572</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Collaud Coen et al.(2014)Collaud Coen, Praz, Haefele, Ruffieux,
Kaufmann, and Calpini</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collaud Coen, M., Praz, C., Haefele, A., Ruffieux, D., Kaufmann, P., and Calpini, B.: Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13205–13221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13205-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13205-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Collaud Coen et al.(2026)Collaud Coen, Brem, Gysel-Beer, Modini,
Henne, Steinbacher, Putero, Gini, and Eleftheriadis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collaud Coen, M., Brem, B. T., Gysel-Beer, M., Modini, R., Henne, S., Steinbacher, M., Putero, D., Gini, M. I., and Eleftheriadis, K.: Detection and climatology of Saharan dust frequency and mass at the Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l., Switzerland), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 1623–1645, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1623-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1623-2026</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Dada et al.(2025)Dada, Brem, Amarandi-Netedu, Collaud Coen,
Evangeliou, Hüglin, Nowak, Modini, Steinbacher, and Gysel-Beer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dada, L., Brem, B. T., Amarandi-Netedu, L.-M., Collaud Coen, M., Evangeliou, N., Hueglin, C., Nowak, N., Modini, R., Steinbacher, M., and Gysel-Beer, M.: Sources of ultrafine particles at a rural midland site in Switzerland, Aerosol Research, 3, 315–336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-315-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-3-315-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Deshmukh et al.(2025)Deshmukh, Poulain, Wehner, Henning, Petit,
Fombelle, Favez, Herrmann, and Pöhlker</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deshmukh, S., Poulain, L., Wehner, B., Henning, S., Petit, J.-E., Fombelle, P., Favez, O., Herrmann, H., and Pöhlker, M.: External particle mixing influences hygroscopicity in a sub-urban area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 741–758, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-741-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-741-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Díaz-Zurita et al.(2025)Díaz-Zurita, Naval-Hernández,
Whiteman, Rodríguez-Navarro, Muñiz-Rosado, Pérez-Ramírez,
Alados-Arboledas, and Navas-Guzmán</label><mixed-citation>
      
Díaz-Zurita, A., Naval-Hernández, V. M., Whiteman, D. N.,
Rodríguez-Navarro, O., Muñiz-Rosado, J., Pérez-Ramírez, D.,
Alados-Arboledas, L., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Sensitivity Analysis of the
Differential Atmospheric Transmission in Water Vapour Mixing Ratio Retrieval
from Raman Lidar Measurements, Remote Sens, 17, 3444,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17203444" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17203444</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Díaz-Zurita et al.(2026)Díaz-Zurita, Navas-Guzmán, and
Pérez-Ramírez</label><mixed-citation>
      
Díaz-Zurita, A., Navas-Guzmán, F., and Pérez-Ramírez, D.:
Five-day NOAA HYSPLIT backward trajectories for hygroscopic aerosol layers
over Payerne, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23010868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23010868</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Dinoev et al.(2013)Dinoev, Simeonov, Arshinov, Bobrovnikov, Ristori,
Calpini, Parlange, and Bergh</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dinoev, T., Simeonov, V., Arshinov, Y., Bobrovnikov, S., Ristori, P., Calpini, B., Parlange, M., and van den Bergh, H.: Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations, RALMO – Part 1: Instrument description, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1329–1346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1329-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1329-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Doane(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Doane, D. P.: Aesthetic frequency classifications, Am. Stat., 30,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1976.10479172" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1976.10479172</a>, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Douville et al.(2021)Douville, Raghavan, Renwick, Allan, Arias,
Barlow, Cerezo-Mota, Cherchi, Gan, Gergis, Jiang, Khan, Pokam Mba, Rosenfeld,
Tierney, and Zolina</label><mixed-citation>
      
Douville, H., Raghavan, K., Renwick, J., Allan, R., Arias, P., Barlow, M.,
Cerezo-Mota, R., Cherchi, A., Gan, T., Gergis, J., Jiang, D., Khan, A.,
Pokam Mba, W., Rosenfeld, D., Tierney, J., and Zolina, O.: Water Cycle
Changes, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A.,
Connors, S., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis,
M., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J., Maycock, T.,
Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., chap. 8, pp. 1055–1210,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.010</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Durand et al.(2023)Durand, Durdina, Smallwood, Johnson, Spirig,
Edebeli, Roth, Brem, Sevcenco, and Crayford</label><mixed-citation>
      
Durand, E., Durdina, L., Smallwood, G., Johnson, M., Spirig, C., Edebeli, J.,
Roth, M., Brem, B., Sevcenco, Y., and Crayford, A.: Correction for particle
loss in a regulatory aviation nvPM emissions system using measured particle
size, J. Aerosol. Sci., 169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106140</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Eck et al.(2012)Eck, Holben, Reid, Giles, Rivas, Singh, Tripathi,
Bruegge, Platnick, Arnold, Krotkov, Carn, Sinyuk, Dubovik, Arola, Schafer,
Artaxo, Smirnov, Chen, and Goloub</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Reid, J. S., Giles, D. M., Rivas, M. A., Singh,
R. P., Tripathi, S. N., Bruegge, C. J., Platnick, S., Arnold, G. T., Krotkov,
N. A., Carn, S. A., Sinyuk, A., Dubovik, O., Arola, A., Schafer, J. S.,
Artaxo, P., Smirnov, A., Chen, H., and Goloub, P.: Fog- and cloud-induced
aerosol modification observed by the aerosol robotic network (AERONET), J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016839" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016839</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Eirund et al.(2022)Eirund, Drossaart van Dusseldorp, Brem, Dedekind,
Karrer, Stoll, and Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eirund, G. K., Drossaart van Dusseldorp, S., Brem, B. T., Dedekind, Z., Karrer,
Y., Stoll, M., and Lohmann, U.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions
during a Saharan dust event–A summertime case-study from the Alps, Q. J. R.
Meteorol. Soc., 148, 943–961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4240" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4240</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>EMPA(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
EMPA: Technischer Bericht zum Nationalen Beobachtungsnetz für
Luftfremdstoffe (NABEL) 2025, Tech. rep., EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland,
<a href="https://www.empa.ch/documents/d/s503/technischer-bericht-nabel-2025" target="_blank"/> (last access: 16 October 2026), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Feingold and Morley(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feingold, G. and Morley, B.: Aerosol hygroscopic properties as measured by
lidar and comparison with in situ measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 108,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002842" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002842</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Fernández et al.(2018)Fernández, Molero, Becerril-Valle, Coz,
Salvador, Artíñano, and Pujadas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fernández, A. J., Molero, F., Becerril-Valle, M., Coz, E., Salvador, P.,
Artíñano, B., and Pujadas, M.: Application of Remote Sens techniques to
study aerosol water vapour uptake in a real Atmos, Atmos. Res., 202,
112–127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.11.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.11.020</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Ferrare et al.(1998)Ferrare, Melfi, Whiteman, Evans, Poellot, and
Kaufman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ferrare, R. A., Melfi, S. H., Whiteman, D. N., Evans, K. D., Poellot, M., and
Kaufman, Y. J.: Raman lidar measurements of aerosol extinction and
backscattering 2. Derivation of aerosol real refractive index,
single-scattering albedo, and humidification factor using Raman lidar and
aircraft size distribution measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01647" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01647</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Fierz-Schmidhauser et al.(2010)Fierz-Schmidhauser, Zieger, Gysel,
Kammermann, DeCarlo, Baltensperger, and Weingartner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Zieger, P., Gysel, M., Kammermann, L., DeCarlo, P. F., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Measured and predicted aerosol light scattering enhancement factors at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2319–2333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Giles et al.(2019)Giles, Sinyuk, Sorokin, Schafer, Smirnov, Slutsker,
Eck, Holben, Lewis, Campbell, Welton, Korkin, and Lyapustin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R., Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 169–209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Goldsmith(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goldsmith, J. E.: Turn-key Raman lidar for profiling atmospheric water vapor,
clouds, and aerosols, Appl. Opt., 37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.37.004979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.37.004979</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Granados-Muñoz et al.(2015)Granados-Muñoz, Navas-Guzmán,
Bravo-Aranda, Guerrero-Rascado, Lyamani, Valenzuela, Titos,
Fernández-Gálvez, and Alados-Arboledas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Navas-Guzmán, F., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Lyamani, H., Valenzuela, A., Titos, G., Fernández-Gálvez, J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Hygroscopic growth of atmospheric aerosol particles based on active remote sensing and radiosounding measurements: selected cases in southeastern Spain, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 705–718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-705-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-705-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Gysel et al.(2007)Gysel, Crosier, Topping, Whitehead, Bower, Cubison,
Williams, Flynn, McFiggans, and Coe</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gysel, M., Crosier, J., Topping, D. O., Whitehead, J. D., Bower, K. N., Cubison, M. J., Williams, P. I., Flynn, M. J., McFiggans, G. B., and Coe, H.: Closure study between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6131–6144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Haefele et al.(2016)Haefele, Hervo, Turp, Lampin, Haeffelin, Lehmann
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haefele, A., Hervo, M., Turp, M., Lampin, J.-L., Haeffelin, M., Lehmann, V., the E-PROFILE team, and the TOPROF team: The E-PROFILE network for the operational measurement of wind and
aerosol profiles over Europe, in: Proceedings of TECO, Madrid, Spain,
<a href="https://www.eumetnet.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/E-PROFILE_TECO_Madrid_2016.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 November 2026),
2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Hale and Querry(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hale, G. M. and Querry, M. R.: Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to
200-µm Wavelength Region, Appl. Opt., 12, 555–563,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.12.000555" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.12.000555</a>, 1973.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Hänel(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hänel, G.: The properties of atmospheric aerosol particles as functions of the
relative humidity at thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding moist
air, Adv. Geophys., 19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60142-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60142-9</a>, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Hermann et al.(2001)Hermann, Stratmann, Wilck, and
Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hermann, M., Stratmann, F., Wilck, M., and Wiedensohler, A.: Sampling
characteristics of an aircraft-borne aerosol inlet system, J. Atmos. Ocean
Tech., 18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018&lt;0007:SCOAAB&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018&lt;0007:SCOAAB&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Hicks-Jalali et al.(2020)Hicks-Jalali, Sica, Martucci, Barras,
Voirin, and Haefele</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hicks-Jalali, S., Sica, R. J., Martucci, G., Maillard Barras, E., Voirin, J., and Haefele, A.: A Raman lidar tropospheric water vapour climatology and height-resolved trend analysis over Payerne, Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9619–9640, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9619-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9619-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Holben et al.(1998)Holben, Eck, Slutsker, Tanré, Buis, Setzer,
Vermote, Reagan, Kaufman, Nakajima, Lavenu, Jankowiak, and
Smirnov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A.,
Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F.,
Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A federated instrument network and
data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Hüglin and Grange(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hüglin, C. and Grange, S. K.: Chemical Characterisation and Source
Identification of PM10 and PM2.5 in Switzerland, Project report, Empa, Swiss
Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf,
Switzerland,
<a href="https://www.bafu.admin.ch/dam/en/sd-web/oyMXRQizcq24/chemical-characterisation-and-source-identification-of-pm-in-switzerland.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.bafu.admin.ch/dam/en/sd-web/oyMXRQizcq24</a> (last access: 5 November 2026), 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Hüglin and Schwarzenbach(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hüglin, C. and Schwarzenbach, B.: Feinstaubmessungen (PM10 und PM2.5) mit dem
Fidas 200 der Firma Palas im NABEL, Tech. rep., Empa, Abteilung für
Luftfremdstoffe und Umwelttechnik,
<a href="https://www.empa.ch/documents/56101/246436/Fidas_200_NABEL.pdf/93790947-135a-4575-a718-370316f506c5" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 November 2026), 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Hüglin et al.(2024)Hüglin, Buchmann, Steinbacher, and
Emmenegger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hüglin, C., Buchmann, B., Steinbacher, M., and Emmenegger, L.: The Swiss
National Air Pollution Monitoring Network (NABEL) – Bridging Science and
Environmental Policy, Chimia, 78, 722–727, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2024.722" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2024.722</a>,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Jefferson et al.(2017)Jefferson, Hageman, Morrow, Mei, and
Watson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jefferson, A., Hageman, D., Morrow, H., Mei, F., and Watson, T.: Seven years of
aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth measurements from SGP: Factors
influencing water uptake, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026804" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026804</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Jing et al.(2026)Jing, He, Yin, Müller, Huang, and Yi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Müller, D., Huang, K., and Yi, F.: Hygroscopic growth characteristics of anthropogenic aerosols over central China revealed by lidar observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 389–403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-389-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-389-2026</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Jones et al.(2021)Jones, Hill, Remy, Abraham, Dalvi, Hardacre,
Hewitt, Johnson, Mulcahy, and Turnock</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jones, A. C., Hill, A., Remy, S., Abraham, N. L., Dalvi, M., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Johnson, B., Mulcahy, J. P., and Turnock, S. T.: Exploring the sensitivity of atmospheric nitrate concentrations to nitric acid uptake rate using the Met Office's Unified Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15901–15927, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Kammermann et al.(2010)Kammermann, Gysel, Weingartner, and
Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kammermann, L., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: 13-month climatology of the aerosol hygroscopicity at the free tropospheric site Jungfraujoch (3580&thinsp;m&thinsp;a.s.l.), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10717–10732, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10717-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10717-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Keller et al.(2023)Keller, Specht, Steigmeier, and
Weingartner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keller, A., Specht, P., Steigmeier, P., and Weingartner, E.: A novel measurement system for unattended, in situ characterization of carbonaceous aerosols, Aerosol Research, 1, 65–79, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-1-65-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-1-65-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Klett(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Klett, J. D.: Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar
returns, Appl. Opt., 20, 211–220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.20.000211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.20.000211</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Klett(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Klett, J. D.: Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios, Appl.
Opt., 24, 1638–1643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.24.001638" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.24.001638</a>, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Laly et al.(2025)Laly, Chazette, Totems, Crenn, Ledur, and
Marpillat</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laly, F., Chazette, P., Totems, J., Crenn, V., Ledur, D., and Marpillat, A.: How does humidity affect lidar-derived aerosol optical properties, and how do they compare with CAMS?, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 7629–7649, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7629-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7629-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Li et al.(2025)Li, Li, Fan, Chen, Lin, Hou, Zhang, Zheng, and
Chen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, L., Li, M., Fan, X., Chen, Y., Lin, Z., Hou, A., Zhang, S., Zheng, R., and Chen, J.: Measurement report: The variation properties of aerosol hygroscopic growth related to chemical composition during new particle formation days in a coastal city of Southeast China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3669–3685, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3669-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3669-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>List(1951)</label><mixed-citation>
      
List, R. J.: Smithsonian Meteorological Tables, vol. 114 of <i>Smithsonian
Miscellaneous Collections</i>, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 6th
revised edn.,  <a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/23746" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 November 2026),
1951.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Liu et al.(2018)Liu, Tan, Fan, Cai, Xu, Li, and Chan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, L., Tan, H., Fan, S., Cai, M., Xu, H., Li, F., and Chan, P.: Influence of
aerosol hygroscopicity and mixing state on aerosol optical properties in the
Pearl River Delta region, China, Sci. Total Environ., 627,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.199" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.199</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Liu and Daum(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y. and Daum, P. H.: Relationship of refractive index to mass density and
self-consistency of mixing rules for multicomponent mixtures like ambient
aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.06.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.06.006</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Liu et al.(2021)Liu, Feng, Zheng, Bao, Liu, Ge, Zhao, Jiang, Liao,
Zhang, Fan, Yan, Chu, Wang, Du, Cai, Bianchi, Petäjä, Mu, He, and
Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., Feng, Z., Zheng, F., Bao, X., Liu, P., Ge, Y., Zhao, Y., Jiang, T., Liao, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, X., Yan, C., Chu, B., Wang, Y., Du, W., Cai, J., Bianchi, F., Petäjä, T., Mu, Y., He, H., and Kulmala, M.: Ammonium nitrate promotes sulfate formation through uptake kinetic regime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13269–13286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13269-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13269-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Lorenzo et al.(2025)Lorenzo, Ziemba, Arellano, Barth, Crosbie,
DiGangi, Diskin, Ferrare, Hilario, Shook, Tilmes, Wang, Xiao, Zhang, and
Sorooshian</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lorenzo, G. R., Ziemba, L. D., Arellano, A. F., Barth, M. C., Crosbie, E. C., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G. S., Ferrare, R., Hilario, M. R. A., Shook, M. A., Tilmes, S., Wang, J., Xiao, Q., Zhang, J., and Sorooshian, A.: Measurement report: Characterization of aerosol hygroscopicity over Southeast Asia during the NASA CAMP<sup>2</sup>Ex campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5469–5495, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5469-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5469-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Lv et al.(2017)Lv, Liu, Li, Mao, Sun, Wang, Wang, and Xie</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lv, M., Liu, D., Li, Z., Mao, J., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., and Xie, C.:
Hygroscopic growth of atmospheric aerosol particles based on lidar,
radiosonde, and in situ measurements: Case studies from the Xinzhou field
campaign, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 188,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.12.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.12.029</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Martucci et al.(2018)Martucci, Voirin, Simeonov, Renaud, and
Haefele</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martucci, G., Voirin, J., Simeonov, V., Renaud, L., and Haefele, A.: A novel
automatic calibration system for water vapor Raman LIDAR, in: EPJ Web of
Conferences, vol. 176, p. 05008, EDP Sciences, ISSN 2100014X,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817605008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817605008</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Martucci et al.(2021)Martucci, Navas-Guzmán, Renaud, Romanens,
Gamage, Hervo, Jeannet, and Haefele</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martucci, G., Navas-Guzmán, F., Renaud, L., Romanens, G., Gamage, S. M., Hervo, M., Jeannet, P., and Haefele, A.: Validation of pure rotational Raman temperature data from the Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) at Payerne, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1333–1353, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1333-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1333-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>MeteoSwiss(2026a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
MeteoSwiss: Air Pressure and Anticyclone Overview,
<a href="https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/weather/weather-and-climate-from-a-to-z/anticyclone-high-pressure.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 January 2026), 2026a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>MeteoSwiss(2026b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
MeteoSwiss: Air Pressure and Anticyclone Overview,
<a href="https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/weather/weather-and-climate-from-a-to-z/low-pressure-situation.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 January 2026), 2026b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Minguillón et al.(2012)Minguillón, Querol, Baltensperger, and
Prévôt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Minguillón, M. C., Querol, X., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S.: Fine
and coarse PM composition and sources in rural and urban sites in
Switzerland: Local or regional pollution?, Sci. Total Environ., 427-428,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.030</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Miri et al.(2024)Miri, Pujol, Hu, Goloub, Veselovskii, Podvin, and
Ducos</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miri, R., Pujol, O., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Veselovskii, I., Podvin, T., and Ducos, F.: Innovative aerosol hygroscopic growth study from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar and microwave radiometer synergy, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3367–3375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Mouton et al.(2023)Mouton, Malek, James, Pokhrel, Fiddler, Asa-Awuku,
and Bililign</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mouton, M., Malek, K. A., James, M. H., Pokhrel, R. P., Fiddler, M. N.,
Asa-Awuku, A. A., and Bililign, S.: The hygroscopic properties of biomass
burning aerosol from Eucalyptus and cow dung under different combustion
conditions, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 57, 665–677,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2198587" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2198587</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Müller et al.(2011)Müller, Laborde, Kassell, and
Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Müller, T., Laborde, M., Kassell, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: Design and performance of a three-wavelength LED-based total scatter and backscatter integrating nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1291–1303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Navas-Guzmán et al.(2014)Navas-Guzmán, Fernández-Gálvez,
Granados-Muñoz, Guerrero-Rascado, Bravo-Aranda, and
Alados-Arboledas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Navas-Guzmán, F., Fernández-Gálvez, J., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Tropospheric water vapour and relative humidity profiles from lidar and microwave radiometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1201–1211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1201-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1201-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Navas-Guzmán et al.(2016)Navas-Guzmán, Kämpfer, and
Haefele</label><mixed-citation>
      
Navas-Guzmán, F., Kämpfer, N., and Haefele, A.: Validation of brightness and physical temperature from two scanning microwave radiometers in the 60&thinsp;GHz O2 band using radiosonde measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4587–4600, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4587-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4587-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Navas-Guzmán et al.(2019)Navas-Guzmán, Martucci, Coen,
Granados-Muñoz, Hervo, Sicard, and Haefele</label><mixed-citation>
      
Navas-Guzmán, F., Martucci, G., Collaud Coen, M., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Hervo, M., Sicard, M., and Haefele, A.: Characterization of aerosol hygroscopicity using Raman lidar measurements at the EARLINET station of Payerne, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11651–11668, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11651-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11651-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Nowak(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nowak, D.: Radiation and clouds: observations and model calculations for
Payerne BSRN site, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005694186" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005694186</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Nowak et al.(2023–2025)Nowak, Brem, Gysel-Beer, and
Simon</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nowak, N., Brem, B., Gysel-Beer, M., and Simon, L.: Inorganics in air and
particle phase at Payerne, EBAS at NILU, <a href="https://doi.org/10.48597/HB8T-9C9B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48597/HB8T-9C9B</a>,
2023–2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Pariyothon et al.(2023)Pariyothon, Bualert, Choomanee,
Rungratanaubon, Thongyen, Fakkaew, Phuetfoo, Phupijit, and
Szymanski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pariyothon, J., Bualert, S., Choomanee, P., Rungratanaubon, T., Thongyen, T.,
Fakkaew, N., Phuetfoo, C., Phupijit, J., and Szymanski, W. W.: Hygroscopic
Growth Factors of Sub-micrometer Atmospheric Aerosols at Four Selected Sites
in Thailand, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.220374</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Petzold et al.(2013)Petzold, Ogren, Fiebig, Laj, Li, Baltensperger,
Holzer-Popp, Kinne, Pappalardo, Sugimoto, Wehrli, Wiedensohler, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting ”black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Pérez-Ramírez et al.(2021)Pérez-Ramírez, Whiteman, Veselovskii,
Ferrare, Titos, Granados-Muñoz, Sanchez-Hernandez, and
Navas-Guzman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Ramírez, D., Whiteman, D. N., Veselovskii, I., Ferrare, R., Titos, G., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Sánchez-Hernández, G., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Spatiotemporal changes in aerosol properties by hygroscopic growth and impacts on radiative forcing and heating rates during DISCOVER-AQ 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12021–12048, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Prahl(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prahl, S.: miepython: Pure Python calculation of Mie scattering, Zenodo,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7949264" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7949264</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Rolph et al.(2017)Rolph, Stein, and Stunder</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rolph, G., Stein, A., and Stunder, B.: Real-time Environmental Applications and
Display sYstem: READY, Environ. Model Softw., 95,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Rosen and Kjome(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rosen, J. M. and Kjome, N. T.: Backscattersonde: a new instrument for
atmospheric Aerosol Res, Appl. Opt., 30, 1552–1561,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.30.001552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.30.001552</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Rovira et al.(2025)Rovira, Savadkoohi, Chen, Močnik, Aas,
Alados-Arboledas, Artiñano, Aurela, Backman, Banerji, Beddow, Brem, Chazeau,
Coen, Colombi, Conil, Costabile, Coz, de Brito, Eleftheriadis, Favez,
Flentje, Freney, Gregorič, Gysel-Beer, Harrison, Hüglin, Hyvärinen,
Ivančič, Kalogridis, Keernik, Konstantinos, Laj, Liakakou, Lin, Listrani,
Luoma, Maasikmets, Manninen, Marchand, dos Santos, Mbengue, Mihalopoulos,
Nicolae, Niemi, Norman, Ovadnevaite, Petit, Platt, Prévôt, Pujadas, Putaud,
Riffault, Rigler, Rinaldi, Schwarz, Silvergren, Teinemaa, Teinilä, Timonen,
Titos, Tobler, Vasilescu, Vratolis, Yttri, Yubero, Zíková, Alastuey,
Petäjä, Querol, Yus-Díez, and Pandolfi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rovira, J., Savadkoohi, M., Chen, G. I., Močnik, G., Aas, W.,
Alados-Arboledas, L., Artiñano, B., Aurela, M., Backman, J., Banerji, S.,
Beddow, D., Brem, B., Chazeau, B., Coen, M. C., Colombi, C., Conil, S.,
Costabile, F., Coz, E., de Brito, J. F., Eleftheriadis, K., Favez, O.,
Flentje, H., Freney, E., Gregorič, A., Gysel-Beer, M., Harrison, R.,
Hüglin, C., Hyvärinen, A., Ivančič, M., Kalogridis, A. C., Keernik, H.,
Konstantinos, G., Laj, P., Liakakou, E., Lin, C., Listrani, S., Luoma, K.,
Maasikmets, M., Manninen, H. E., Marchand, N., dos Santos, S. M., Mbengue,
S., Mihalopoulos, N., Nicolae, D., Niemi, J. V., Norman, M., Ovadnevaite, J.,
Petit, J. E., Platt, S., Prévôt, A. S., Pujadas, M., Putaud, J. P.,
Riffault, V., Rigler, M., Rinaldi, M., Schwarz, J., Silvergren, S., Teinemaa,
E., Teinilä, K., Timonen, H., Titos, G., Tobler, A., Vasilescu, J.,
Vratolis, S., Yttri, K. E., Yubero, E., Zíková, N., Alastuey, A., Petäjä,
T., Querol, X., Yus-Díez, J., and Pandolfi, M.: A European aerosol
phenomenology – 9: Light absorption properties of carbonaceous aerosol
particles across surface Europe, Environ. Int., 195,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109185</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Rubia(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rubia, J. M. D. L.: Rice University Rule to Determine the Number of Bins, Open
J. Stat., 14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2024.141006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2024.141006</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Schafer et al.(2008)Schafer, Eck, Holben, Artaxo, and
Duarte</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schafer, J. S., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Artaxo, P., and Duarte, A. F.:
Characterization of the optical properties of atmospheric aerosols in
Amazônia from long-term AERONET monitoring (1993–1995 and 1999–2006), J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009319" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009319</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Scott(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scott, D. W.: Scott's rule, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational
Statistics, 2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.103</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Seinfeld et al.(2016)Seinfeld, Bretherton, Carslaw, Coe, DeMott,
Dunlea, Feingold, Ghan, Guenther, Kahn, Kraucunas, Kreidenweis, Molina,
Nenes, Penner, Prather, Ramanathan, Ramaswamy, Rasch, Ravishankara,
Rosenfeld, Stephens, and Wood</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S., Guenther, A. B., Kahn, R., Kraucunas,
I., Kreidenweis, S. M., Molina, M. J., Nenes, A., Penner, J. E., Prather,
K. A., Ramanathan, V., Ramaswamy, V., Rasch, P. J., Ravishankara, A. R.,
Rosenfeld, D., Stephens, G., and Wood, R.: Improving our fundamental
understanding of the role of aerosol-cloud interactions in the climate
system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514043113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514043113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Sicard et al.(2022)Sicard, Oliveira, Muñoz-Porcar, Gil-Díaz,
Comerón, Rodríguez-Gómez, and Otín</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sicard, M., Fortunato dos Santos Oliveira, D. C., Muñoz-Porcar, C., Gil-Díaz, C., Comerón, A., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., and Dios Otín, F.: Measurement report: Spectral and statistical analysis of aerosol hygroscopic growth from multi-wavelength lidar measurements in Barcelona, Spain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7681–7697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7681-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7681-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Stein et al.(2015)Stein, Draxler, Rolph, Stunder, Cohen, and
Ngan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M. D., and
Ngan, F.: Noaa's hysplit atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling
system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Swietlicki et al.(2008)Swietlicki, Hansson, Hämeri, Svenningsson,
Massling, Mcfiggans, Mcmurry, Petäjä, Tunved, Gysel, Topping, Weingartner,
Baltensperger, Rissler, Wiedensohler, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>
      
Swietlicki, E., Hansson, H. C., Hämeri, K., Svenningsson, B., Massling, A.,
Mcfiggans, G., Mcmurry, P. H., Petäjä, T., Tunved, P., Gysel, M., Topping,
D., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Rissler, J., Wiedensohler, A., and
Kulmala, M.: Hygroscopic properties of submicrometer atmospheric aerosol
particles measured with H-TDMA instruments in various environments – A
review, Tellus B, 60 B,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Titos et al.(2014a)Titos, Jefferson, Sheridan, Andrews,
Lyamani, Alados-Arboledas, and Ogren</label><mixed-citation>
      
Titos, G., Jefferson, A., Sheridan, P. J., Andrews, E., Lyamani, H., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Ogren, J. A.: Aerosol light-scattering enhancement due to water uptake during the TCAP campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7031–7043, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7031-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7031-2014</a>, 2014a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Titos et al.(2014b)Titos, Lyamani, Cazorla, Sorribas,
Foyo-Moreno, Wiedensohler, and Alados-Arboledas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Titos, G., Lyamani, H., Cazorla, A., Sorribas, M., Foyo-Moreno, I.,
Wiedensohler, A., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Study of the relative humidity
dependence of aerosol light-scattering in southern Spain, Tellus B, 66, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.24536" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.24536</a>, 2014b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Titos et al.(2016)Titos, Cazorla, Zieger, Andrews, Lyamani,
Granados-Muñoz, Olmo, and Alados-Arboledas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Titos, G., Cazorla, A., Zieger, P., Andrews, E., Lyamani, H., Granados-Muñoz,
M. J., Olmo, F. J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Effect of hygroscopic growth on
the aerosol light-scattering coefficient: A review of measurements,
techniques and error sources, J. Atmos. Environ., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Titos et al.(2021)Titos, Burgos, Zieger, Alados-Arboledas,
Baltensperger, Jefferson, Sherman, Weingartner, Henzing, Luoma, O'Dowd,
Wiedensohler, and Andrews</label><mixed-citation>
      
Titos, G., Burgos, M. A., Zieger, P., Alados-Arboledas, L., Baltensperger, U., Jefferson, A., Sherman, J., Weingartner, E., Henzing, B., Luoma, K., O'Dowd, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Andrews, E.: A global study of hygroscopicity-driven light-scattering enhancement in the context of other in situ aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13031–13050, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13031-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Vaisala(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vaisala: Vaisala Radiosonde RS41 Measurement Performance, Tech. rep., Vaisala,
Helsinki, Finland,
<a href="https://www.vaisala.com/sites/default/files/documents/WEA-MET-RS41-Performance-White-paper-B211356EN-B-LOW-v3.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.vaisala.com/sites/default/files/documents/WEA-MET-RS41-Performance-White-paper</a> (last access: 5 November 2026),
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Vernier et al.(2015)Vernier, Fairlie, Natarajan, Wienhold, Bian,
Martinsson, Crumeyrolle, Thomason, and Bedka</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J.,
Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.:
Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and its
potential connection with Asian pollution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
1609–1619, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2009)Veselovskii, Whiteman, Kolgotin, Andrews, and
Korenskii</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veselovskii, I., Whiteman, D. N., Kolgotin, A., Andrews, E., and Korenskii, M.:
Demonstration of aerosol property profiling by multiwavelength lidar under
varying relative humidity conditions, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 26, 1543–1557,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1254.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1254.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2013)Veselovskii, Whiteman, Korenskiy, Kolgotin,
Dubovik, Perez-Ramirez, and Suvorina</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veselovskii, I., Whiteman, D. N., Korenskiy, M., Kolgotin, A., Dubovik, O., Perez-Ramirez, D., and Suvorina, A.: Retrieval of spatio-temporal distributions of particle parameters from multiwavelength lidar measurements using the linear estimation technique and comparison with AERONET, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2671–2682, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2671-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2671-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2015)Veselovskii, Whiteman, Korenskiy, Suvorina,
and Perez-Ramirez</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veselovskii, I., Whiteman, D. N., Korenskiy, M., Suvorina, A., and Pérez-Ramírez, D.: Use of rotational Raman measurements in multiwavelength aerosol lidar for evaluation of particle backscattering and extinction, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4111–4122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4111-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4111-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2025)Veselovskii, Hu, Goloub, Podvin, Dubois,
Kolgotin, and Korenskii</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veselovskii, I., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Podvin, T., Dubois, G., Kolgotin, A., and Korenskii, M.: Impact of water uptake on fluorescence of atmospheric aerosols: insights from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6039–6051, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6039-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6039-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Whiteman(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Whiteman, D. N.: Examination of the traditional Raman lidar technique I
Evaluating the temperature-dependent lidar equations, Appl. Opt., 42,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.42.002571" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.42.002571</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Whiteman et al.(1992)Whiteman, Melfi, and Ferrare</label><mixed-citation>
      
Whiteman, D. N., Melfi, S. H., and Ferrare, R. A.: Raman lidar system for the
measurement of water vapor and aerosols in the Earth’s Atmos, Appl. Opt., 31,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.31.003068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.31.003068</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Whiteman et al.(2006)Whiteman, Demoz, Girolamo, Comer, Veselovskii,
Evans, Wang, Cadirola, Rush, Schwemmer, Gentry, Melfi, Mielke, Venable, and
van Hove</label><mixed-citation>
      
Whiteman, D. N., Demoz, B., Girolamo, P. D., Comer, J., Veselovskii, I., Evans,
K., Wang, Z., Cadirola, M., Rush, K., Schwemmer, G., Gentry, B., Melfi,
S. H., Mielke, B., Venable, D., and van Hove, T.: Raman lidar measurements
during the International H2O Project. Part I: Instrumentation and analysis
techniques, J. Atmos. Ocean Technol., 23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1838.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1838.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>WMO(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
WMO: Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, WMO-No.
8, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 7th edn.,
<a href="https://www.weather.gov/media/epz/mesonet/CWOP-WMO8.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 November 2026),
2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Wulfmeyer and Feingold(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wulfmeyer, V. and Feingold, G.: On the relationship between relative humidity
and particle backscattering coefficient in the marine boundary layer
determined with differential absorption lidar, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901030</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Yau and Rogers(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yau, M. K. and Rogers, R. R.: A short course in cloud physics, Elsevier, 3rd
edn., <a href="https://shop.elsevier.com/books/a-short-course-in-cloud-physics/yau/978-0-08-057094-5" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 November 2026),
1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Yuan and Zhao(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yuan, L. and Zhao, C.: Quantifying particle-to-particle heterogeneity in aerosol hygroscopicity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3195–3205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3195-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3195-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Zanatta et al.(2016)Zanatta, Gysel, Bukowiecki, Müller, Weingartner,
Areskoug, Fiebig, Yttri, Mihalopoulos, Kouvarakis, Beddows, Harrison,
Cavalli, Putaud, Spindler, Wiedensohler, Alastuey, Pandolfi, Sellegri,
Swietlicki, Jaffrezo, Baltensperger, and Laj</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zanatta, M., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Müller, T., Weingartner, E., Areskoug,
H., Fiebig, M., Yttri, K. E., Mihalopoulos, N., Kouvarakis, G., Beddows, D.,
Harrison, R. M., Cavalli, F., Putaud, J. P., Spindler, G., Wiedensohler, A.,
Alastuey, A., Pandolfi, M., Sellegri, K., Swietlicki, E., Jaffrezo, J. L.,
Baltensperger, U., and Laj, P.: A European aerosol phenomenology-5:
Climatology of black carbon optical properties at 9 regional background sites
across Europe, Atmos. Environ., 145,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.035</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Zhang et al.(2025)Zhang, Wang, Xu, Zuo, Lu, Zhu, Yang, Yan, and
Sun</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Xu, J., Zuo, X., Lu, C., Zhu, B., Yang, Y., Yan, X., and Sun, Y.: Measurement report: Size-resolved and seasonal variations in aerosol hygroscopicity dominated by organic formation and aging: insights from a year-long observation in Nanjing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 17413–17428, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17413-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17413-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Zieger et al.(2013)Zieger, Fierz-Schmidhauser, Weingartner, and
Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10609–10631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Zieger et al.(2014)Zieger, Fierz-Schmidhauser, Poulain, Müller,
Birmili, Spindler, Wiedensohler, Baltensperger, and Weingartner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Poulain, L., Müller, T., Birmili, W.,
Spindler, G., Wiedensohler, A., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.:
Influence of water uptake on the aerosol particle light scattering
coefficients of the Central European aerosol, Tellus B,
66, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22716" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.22716</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
