<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-14531-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Optical properties and shape-dependent retrievals  of the imaginary part of the refractive  index of freshly emitted Saharan dust</article-title><alt-title>Optical properties of freshly emitted mineral dust particles at the Saharan</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Yus-Díez</surname><given-names>Jesús</given-names></name>
          <email>jesus.yus@ung.si</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8124-1492</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="yes" rid="aff3 aff9">
          <name><surname>Escribano</surname><given-names>Jeronimo</given-names></name>
          <email>jeronimo.escribano@bsc.es</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9682-7624</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pandolfi</surname><given-names>Marco</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Alastuey</surname><given-names>Andrés</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-5495</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff10">
          <name><surname>González-Flórez</surname><given-names>Cristina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Gonzalez-Romero</surname><given-names>Adolfo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0977-6019</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff8">
          <name><surname>Gonçalves Ageitos</surname><given-names>María</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-6403</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Ivančič</surname><given-names>Matic</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Klose</surname><given-names>Martina</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-3700</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Kandler</surname><given-names>Konrad</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8268-6557</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Obiso</surname><given-names>Vincenzo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff11">
          <name><surname>Panta</surname><given-names>Agnesh</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7953-8334</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Reche</surname><given-names>Cristina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Rigler</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-5582</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Querol</surname><given-names>Xavier</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-9899</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff7">
          <name><surname>Perez García-Pando</surname><given-names>Carlos</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-0697</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, 08034, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Nova Gorica, Ajdovščina, 5270, Slovenia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Aerosol d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Troposphere Research (IMKTRO), Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Technical University Darmstadt (TUDa), Darmstadt, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>ICREA, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, 08010, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Projects and Construction Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya,  Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>a</label><institution>now at: European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>b</label><institution>now at: Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>c</label><institution>now at: Palas GmbH, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff><author-comment content-type="econtrib"><p>These authors contributed equally to this work.</p></author-comment>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jesús Yus-Díez (jesus.yus@ung.si) and Jeronimo Escribano (jeronimo.escribano@bsc.es)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>14531</fpage><lpage>14557</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>May</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Jesús Yus-Díez et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e296">Mineral dust is a major contributor to atmospheric aerosol mass and plays a complex role in Earth's radiation budget. However, large uncertainties remain in quantifying its direct radiative effects, partly because dust absorption is poorly constrained and in situ measurements of freshly emitted dust remain scarce. Here, we present high temporal resolution measurements of dust optical properties collected during active dust emission events in the Moroccan Sahara in September 2019. During dust emission periods, the optical properties aligned with previous Saharan dust studies. Single scattering albedo (SSA) for PM<sub>2.5</sub> (PM<sub>10</sub>) was 0.95 (0.94) at 370 nm and 0.97 (0.96) at 660 nm. Coarse particles contributed to negative scattering and SSA Ångström exponents (SSAAE), and absorption Ångström exponents (AAE) reached up to 2.5 (2.0), consistent with stronger wavelength-dependent absorption by iron oxides. The asymmetry parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was 0.7 (0.65) at 520 nm, and the backscatter fraction (BF) was 0.11 (0.13), showing coarse dust's impact on scattering. Mass absorption efficiency (MAE) decreased from 0.30 to 0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 370 nm with increasing particle size. Mass scattering efficiency (MSE) shifted towards longer wavelengths for larger particles. We further retrieved the imaginary part of the complex refractive index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the PM<sub>2.5</sub> dust-event period under prescribed assumptions for particle shape, particle density, and the real part of the refractive index. For the central density assumption, retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 520 nm ranged from 0.00104 for spheres to 0.00145 for triaxial ellipsoids, corresponding to a 40 % increase. These results show that particle-shape assumptions can substantially affect retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and therefore need to be considered when interpreting in situ, remote-sensing, and model estimates of dust optical properties.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>European Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>773051</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad</funding-source>
<award-id>PID2022-140365OB-I00</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility</funding-source>
<award-id>101137680</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions</funding-source>
<award-id>101081355</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>NextGenerationEU</funding-source>
<award-id>C005/24-ED CV1</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs6">
<funding-source>Helmholtz Association</funding-source>
<award-id>VH-NG-1533</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs7">
<funding-source>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding-source>
<award-id>264907654</award-id>
<award-id>416816480</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e384">Mineral dust emitted from arid regions is one of the most abundant aerosol types by mass <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.1"/> and influences the Earth's climate through multiple mechanisms. It exerts a direct radiative effect (DRE) by absorbing and scattering solar and terrestrial radiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.2"/>, a semi-direct effect by modifying atmospheric temperature profiles and influencing cloud properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, and an indirect effect by altering cloud microphysics and precipitation patterns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.4"/>. Mineral dust also affects the cryosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.5"/> and atmospheric chemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.6"/>, contributing to climate and environmental change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e411">Despite its importance, the DRE of mineral dust remains highly uncertain, partly because dust absorption properties are still poorly constrained <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.8"/>. Current estimates place the short-wave DRE at a central value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (90 % confidence) based on model assessments that integrate dust optical depth, optical properties and particle size distributions (PSDs) consistent with limited experimental constraints <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.9"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.10"/> further estimated a 55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % increase in global dust aerosol mass concentrations since pre-industrial times, with an associated global negative mean effective radiative forcing of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, partially offsetting greenhouse warming. However, the uncertainty in this estimate remains substantial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), leaving open the possibility that dust aerosols may have contributed to net warming since pre-industrial times <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e514">Several dust properties influence its optical behaviour and, consequently, its DRE. These include mineralogical composition, PSD, particle shape and morphology, mixing state, total atmospheric dust loading, and vertical distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.12"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Uncertainties in these properties propagate into estimates of dust scattering, absorption, extinction, and angular scattering, thereby affecting radiative-transfer calculations and climate-model simulations.</p>
      <p id="d2e522">Dust optical properties, particularly the complex refractive index (CRI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), play a critical role in determining the dust radiative impact. The real part (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) primarily controls scattering, while the imaginary part (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) controls absorption. The intrinsic CRI of dust depends on its mineralogical composition and describes how a homogeneous material interacts with light on a microscopic scale. For instance, the presence of iron oxides in such minerals as goethite and hematite, plays a dominant role in dust absorption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Several studies have also found that the relative fraction of total iron in dust correlates with its absorption properties, influencing radiative forcing estimates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.14"/>. The imaginary part of the CRI for iron oxides exhibits increased absorption at short-wavelength UV compared to red and near-infrared wavelengths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.15"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. However, particle size and shape influence how a given CRI translates into observable optical properties. It is important to note that in real-world measurements, the effective CRI retrieved from bulk optical observations depends not only on composition but also on the particle size and shape distribution of the dust particles. This is because dust is composed of irregularly shaped particles spanning a wide range of sizes, and retrievals from optical measurements inherently integrate these variations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.16"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e576">The PSD of mineral dust exerts a strong influence on its optical properties because the size parameter, defined by the ratio between particle circumference and wavelength, dictates the dominant scattering regime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.17"/>. Smaller particles tend to scatter light more evenly across angles, whereas larger particles scatter more strongly in the forward direction, increasing extinction and reducing backscattering <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.18"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Coarse-mode dust can dominate dust mass and exert substantial effects on direct radiative forcing, yet is often under-represented in models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.19"/>. Therefore, retrievals of dust optical properties from observations are sensitive not only to composition but also to the PSD used in the interpretation.</p>
      <p id="d2e590">Particle shape further modulates optical properties. Several studies have reported that total extinction by non-spherical dust particles, including spheroids, super-spheroids, and more complex irregular-particle models, can differ from spherical particle calculations by roughly 10 %–20 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, especially when averaged across a typical size distribution, although larger effects have also been reported <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.21"/>. Despite these potential differences in total extinction, the single scattering albedo (SSA) often remains relatively unchanged or only modestly affected. Conversely, shape tends to have a more pronounced impact on the scattering phase function and asymmetry factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), influencing how light is directionally scattered. Retrievals of the effective CRI are impacted by shape assumptions, because standard inversion algorithms often rely on simplified particle geometries. As a result, differences in assumed particle shape can lead to systematic differences in the retrieved imaginary part of the refractive index.</p>
      <p id="d2e608">It is therefore important to distinguish between intrinsic refractive indices, which are determined by particle composition, and effective or retrieved refractive indices, which depend on the assumptions used in the inversion. In atmospheric measurements, the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is conditional on the assumed PSD, particle shape, density, and real refractive index. Additional complexities arise from internal mixing and physico-chemical ageing of dust during transport. This distinction is crucial for interpreting observations, improving remote-sensing retrievals, and reducing uncertainties in climate models.</p>
      <p id="d2e618">Climate models require accurate representations of dust optical properties, including the complex refractive index, single-scattering albedo, and asymmetry parameter. Some studies have examined how various mineralogical compositions and PSDs affect these parameters, often through laboratory experiments with resuspended soil samples <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.22"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, ground-based or satellite remote-sensing, or in-situ observations in known dust outflow regions. However, direct in-situ measurements of freshly emitted dust within source regions remain relatively scarce. Most existing observations in deserts focus on campaigns that capture dust outflow rather than the exact point of emission <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.23"/>, leaving gaps in understanding how local soil characteristics and emission processes govern the initial PSD and optical properties of dust. Measurements from large networks such as AERONET also provide valuable remote retrievals of total-column aerosol properties, though the presence of other particles can complicate dust-specific analyses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e634">To address these gaps, a field campaign was conducted in the Saharan desert (Morocco) in September 2019 under the framework of the FRAGMENT project. One major aim was to characterize the size-resolved mineralogical composition of freshly emitted dust and the emission mechanisms that inject these particles into the lower troposphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.25"/>. A complementary objective, and the focus of the present study, was to measure and interpret the multi-wavelength optical properties of freshly emitted dust.</p>
      <p id="d2e640">Here, we present high-temporal-resolution measurements of extensive properties, namely scattering and absorption coefficients, and derived intensive properties, including SSA, asymmetry parameter, backscatter fraction, Ångström exponents and mass scattering, absorption and extinction efficiencies. We relate these properties to the size of the emitted particles and then retrieve the imaginary part of the complex refractive index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The retrieval is performed under prescribed assumptions for particle shape, particle density, and the real part of the refractive index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We use campaign-specific particle density measurements, particle-shape information from single-particle analyses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.26"/>, optical particle counter measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.27"/>, and additional literature-based shape assumptions to quantify how retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on particle-shape representation.</p>
      <p id="d2e671">In the following, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> presents the measurement site, instruments, optical properties, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval methodology. Particular attention is given to the distinction between corrected scattering coefficients, used for the descriptive optical-property analysis, and truncated scattering coefficients, used in the retrieval. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> presents the results in three parts: first, the temporal evolution of the measured optical properties; second, the relationships between optical properties and particle size; and third, the conditional retrievals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> under different assumptions for particle shape, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The implications and limitations of the retrieval are then discussed in the context of in situ observations, remote sensing, and climate-model applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Measurement site</title>
      <p id="d2e714">In-situ dust measurements were conducted in a mineral dust emission area in southeastern Morocco, at the transition between the southern foothills of the Atlas Mountains and the Saharan Desert. The study site is located in L'Bour (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 500 m a.s.l.), a small terminal depression near the Drâa dry riverbed, west of M'Hammid El Ghizlane. It is also located east of Lake Iriki, a seasonal dry lake, and adjacent to two major dune fields, Erg Cheggaga and Erg Smar (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). The surface at L'Bour is predominantly hard-packed, with crust formations resulting from wind and dust erosion, interspersed with shallow sand dunes less than 1 m high. These characteristics make the site well suited for studying freshly emitted dust from natural Saharan sources. Further details on the sampling site and its environmental conditions can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.28"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.29"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.30"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e777">Location of the area of study over Northern Africa <bold>(a, b, c)</bold>, the instrument deployment over the L’Bour site, where the diagonal black line is perpendicular to the approximate predominant wind direction estimated based on prior data analysis <bold>(d)</bold>, the green points correspond to the optical instruments (AE33 and nephelometer) and the Fidas, which are shown in <bold>(e)</bold>, where the optical instruments are placed in cage in front of the scaffolding and the Fidas is located in the background behind the scaffolding. The integrating nephelometer is placed in the upper level and the Aethalometer AE33 in the lower one. Satellite imagery in panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> were taken from base layer from world imagery of © Google Earth Pro v:7.3.6.9345. The photo in panel <bold>(e)</bold> was taken by one of the authors.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Measurements of optical properties</title>
      <p id="d2e819">Scattering coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were measured using an LED-based multi-angle integrating nephelometer (Aurora 4000, ECOTECH Pty Ltd, Knoxfield, Australia). The nephelometer operates at three wavelengths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">450</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">635</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) and collects scattering measurements at eight angular positions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">170</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The forward (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and backward (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">170</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) scattering measurements are affected by non-ideal illumination of the light source and by angular truncation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.31"/>. For the descriptive analysis of the campaign optical properties, the scattering coefficients were corrected using the correction scheme of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.32"/>. These corrected scattering coefficients are used throughout the manuscript when reporting scattering coefficients, SSA, asymmetry parameter, backscatter fraction, and mass scattering and extinction efficiencies, except in the retrieval of the imaginary part of the complex refractive index.</p>
      <p id="d2e941">For the refractive-index retrieval, we use the uncorrected scattering coefficient measured by the nephelometer, hereafter referred to as the truncated scattering coefficient, (tsca). The corresponding truncated scattering is simulated explicitly in the retrieval observation operator, as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>. This distinction avoids applying a correction from truncated scattering to full-phase-function scattering in the retrieval itself, which would introduce additional assumptions about particle shape and the scattering phase function. The corrected multi-angle scattering measurements were also used to derive the asymmetry parameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.33"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e951">Multi-wavelength aerosol absorption coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were derived using a multi-wavelength dual-spot aethalometer (AE33, Aerosol d.o.o.]). The AE33 measures light attenuation at seven wavelengths spanning from the short-UV to the near-infrared range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">590</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">950</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Absorption coefficients are then computed using Eq. (17) of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.34"/>, with the AE33 online correction for filter loading effects.</p>
      <p id="d2e1028">The uncertainty of AE33-derived absorption coefficients, ranging between 10 % and 30 %, depends strongly on measurement artefacts, particularly the cross-sensitivity of attenuation measurements to light scattering by particles on the filter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.35"/>. To correct for this effect, we used the scattering artefact parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the multiple-scattering parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.36"/> for Saharan mineral soil samples collected during the same FRAGMENT-Morocco campaign and later resuspended and analysed under controlled laboratory conditions. This correction is therefore directly linked to the dust sampled in the present study. To account for uncertainty in the AE33 multiple-scattering correction, we performed a sensitivity analysis using lower and upper values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from the 95 % confidence interval reported in Table S2 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.37"/>. This sensitivity results in an uncertainty of approximately 5 % in the corrected absorption coefficient at 370 nm, increasing up to approximately 20 % at 950 nm, where the relative contribution of the scattering artefact is larger for mineral dust.</p>
      <p id="d2e1067">The aethalometer and nephelometer shared the same sampling line and inlet, with the AE33 pump also used for the nephelometer. During the initial phase of the L’Bour field campaign (4 September 2019 00:00 UTC to 26 September 2019 12:00 UTC), in-situ surface optical measurements were performed using a PM<sub>2.5</sub> inlet. After this date and until the end of the campaign (1 October 2019 08:00:00 UTC), a PM<sub>10</sub> inlet was used instead. To reduce instrumental noise while accounting for all significant turbulent structures carrying momentum flux, all the campaign measurements, including the optical measurements, were averaged into 15 min intervals for analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.38"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Particle size distribution measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e1099">Number PSDs were measured using a Fine Dust Aerosol Spectrometer (Fidas 200S, Palas GmbH). The instrument measured aerosol particles in 63 logarithmically spaced optical-diameter bins between 0.20 and 19.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a time resolution of 120 s and an inlet flow rate of 4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The first three bins were not used as they were found to be unreliable <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.39"><named-content content-type="pre">cf.</named-content></xref>. As for the optical measurements, the Fidas data were averaged into 15 min intervals.  The Fidas was calibrated in the field using polystyrene latex spheres (PSLs) with a CRI of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Because mineral dust particles are non-spherical and absorbing, the PSL-calibrated optical diameters must be converted into dust geometric diameters before deriving mass concentrations and optical simulations. We applied the optical-to-geometric diameter conversion described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS1"/>, following the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.40"/>. This conversion depends on the assumed particle shape and CRI. For the descriptive analysis in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>, mass-dependent quantities were computed using the converted PSD assuming spherical particles and an initial dust refractive-index range guided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.41"/>, with real parts between 1.47 and 1.52, and imaginary parts between 0.0001 to 0.005. The retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> under different prescribed assumptions for particle shape, particle density, and n is described separately in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1170">From the converted number PSD, we calculated the mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by the third moment of the number PSD,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M65" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle geometric diameter, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dust number PSD for diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from the Fidas, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle density. Here, we have used a density of 2.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value was obtained from samples collected at the site and analysed with a helium pycnometer. The method estimates particle density from the volume accessible to helium gas, including open and semi-open pores. The results indicate that particle density decreases with decreasing particle size, reaching approximately 2.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for particles with diameters below 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value is therefore considered a reasonable approximation for the dust particles sampled in the size range relevant to this study.</p>
      <p id="d2e1350"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is then defined as the ratio of the third to the second moment of the number PSD,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M74" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> spans the relevant diameter range between the first valid bin <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and and the upper diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the geometric diameter associated with the aerodynamic diameter of the inlet cut-off, and therefore differs between the PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> periods. The optical-to-geometric diameter conversion is described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS1"/>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and spherical particles, the PM<sub>2.5</sub> aerodynamic cut-off corresponds to a geometric diameter of 1.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Meteorological measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e1571">Wind measurements were conducted at 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above ground level, approximately matching the inlet heights of the optical and PSD instruments. We used a 2-D sonic anemometer (model WINDSONIC4-L, Campbell Scientifics, USA) mounted on a 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> meteorological tower. As described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.42"/>, the tower also hosted multiple 2-D and 3-D sonic anemometers, whose data were processed to derive turbulence parameters, including the wind friction velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  Briefly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained via an iterative law-of-the-wall approach, which assumes a (pseudo)logarithmic wind profile in the atmospheric surface layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.43"><named-content content-type="pre">cf.</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>. Although the raw wind data were recorded at 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, they were averaged into 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals during post-processing to facilitate a stable, consistent comparison with the other collocated instruments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Intensive aerosol optical properties</title>
      <p id="d2e1648">By combining the extensive optical properties, namely absorption from the AE33 and corrected scattering from the polar nephelometer, with the PSDs from the Fidas, we derived  time series of intensive optical properties. These properties depend on the physico-chemical properties of the dust particles, including mineralogy, PSD, and shape. Unless otherwise stated, the scattering coefficients used in this section are the corrected scattering coefficients described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>. The truncated scattering coefficient, tsca, and the corresponding truncated single scattering albedo, tssa, are used only for the retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1662"><list list-type="custom">
            <list-item><label>a.</label>

      <p id="d2e1667">The Scattering Ångström Exponent (SAE) mostly reflects particle size, with values less than 1 typically indicating coarse particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.44"/>, as often observed during fresh dust emissions in our campaign. SAE was calculated by fitting the scattering coefficients at three nephelometer wavelengths in a log-log space,

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M92" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAE</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

                where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the intercept of the linear fit.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>b.</label>

      <p id="d2e1729">The Absorption Ångström Exponent (AAE) is strongly influenced by the particle composition. Under anthropogenic-dominated conditions, AAE typically ranges from 0.9 to 1.1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.45"/>, whereas dust-rich environments yield higher values, typically between 2 and 6.5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.46"/>. This higher AAE reflects the dust enhanced absorption in the short-UV region relative to near-infrared wavelengths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.47"/>, largely associated with iron oxides such as hematite and goethite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Here, AAE was derived by fitting the wavelength dependence of the AE33 absorption coefficients in log-log space,

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M94" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

                where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the intercept of the linear fit.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>c.</label>

      <p id="d2e1803">The Single Scattering Albedo (SSA) is calculated as the scattering (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to extinction, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  SSA indicates the relative importance of aerosol scattering and absorption and is therefore a key parameter for assessing aerosol radiative effects. Values close to 1 indicate predominantly scattering particles, whereas lower values indicate stronger absorption. Typical values for Saharan dust range from 0.92 at 370 nm to 0.98 at 880 nm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.49"/>, and from 0.90 to 0.96 at the green wavelengths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.50"/>, depending on source region, iron content, particle size, and mixing state. In this section, SSA was calculated at the seven AE33 wavelengths by extrapolating the corrected nephelometer scattering coefficients using the derived SAE. This standard SSA should be distinguished from tssa, the truncated SSA used only in the retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>d.</label>

      <p id="d2e1884">The SSA Ångström Exponent (SSAAE) describes the wavelength dependence of SSA. Negative SSAAE values are often associated with coarse dust-dominated conditions, because dust SSA generally increases with wavelength as absorption decreases towards the near-infrared <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.51"/>. SSAAE was obtained by fitting the wavelength dependence of SSA in log-log space,

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M100" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSAAE</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

                where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the intercept of the linear fit.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>e.</label>

      <p id="d2e1943">The asymmetry parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the first moment of the Legendre decomposition of the scalar scattering phase function and describes the mean scattering direction. It ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for purely backward scattering to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for purely forward scattering. For airborne dust particles, values between 0.6 and 0.85 are commonly used in numerical models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.52"/>. Here we derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the phase function of the nephelometer multi-angle measurements, corrected by angular truncation as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>.

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M106" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

                where  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the scattering phase function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.53"/>.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>f.</label>

      <p id="d2e2061">The Backscatter Fraction (BF) is calculated as the ratio between hemispheric backward scattering and total scattering, using the corrected nephelometer measurements. BF provides complementary information to g, with lower BF values generally indicating stronger forward scattering by larger particles. </p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>g.</label>

      <p id="d2e2068">The Mass Absorption, Scattering, and Extinction efficiencies (MAE, MSE, and MEE) represent the absorption, scattering, and extinction efficiencies, respectively, of the measured particles per unit of mass. They were obtained as the ratio between the absorption, scattering, and extinction coefficients, respectively, and the mass concentration derived from the number PSD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). During strong dust-emission events at the study site, this mass concentration can be attributed predominantly to mineral dust. Outside these periods, particularly during episodes influenced by anthropogenic advection, the mass-normalized optical quantities may also reflect the contribution of non-dust absorbing particles. The mass efficiencies are therefore interpreted primarily for the dust-event periods and used to assess how optical properties vary with particle size and inlet cut-off. Values of dust MEE around 0.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been reported in previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.54"/>.</p>
            </list-item>
          </list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Imaginary part of the complex refractive index retrieval</title>
      <p id="d2e2115">The imaginary part of the complex refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was retrieved by comparing measured and simulated optical properties during PM<sub>2.5</sub> dust-event periods. The retrieval uses the truncated scattering, denoted tsca in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>, together with the AE33 absorption coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We define the truncated SSA, tssa, as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M113" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tssa</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tsca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tsca</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2172">The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is then obtained by minimizing the difference between simulated and measured tssa. The optimization is performed under prescribed assumptions for particle shape, particle density, and real part of the refractive index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the retrieval should be interpreted as a conditional estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for each set of assumptions, rather than as a simultaneous retrieval of particle shape, PSD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2210">Our methodology builds on the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.55"/>, but introduces two main modifications motivated by the characteristics of our field dataset. First, the conversion of Fidas optical diameters into dust geometric diameters is coupled to the retrieval, because this conversion depends on the assumed particle shape and refractive index. Second, the cost function is based on tssa, rather than on absorption and scattering coefficients separately. This choice reduces the sensitivity of the retrieval to possible differences in the absolute particle number sampled by the OPC and by the optical instruments, and avoids correcting the measured truncated scattering coefficient to a full-phase-function scattering coefficient in the retrieval itself.</p>
      <p id="d2e2216">The retrieval procedure consists of three main steps: (1) converting the Fidas PSL-calibrated optical diameters into dust geometric diameters under prescribed assumptions for particle shape, density, and real refractive index; (2) simulating truncated scattering and absorption coefficients from the converted PSD; and (3) minimizing a quadratic cost function based on tssa. A general overview of the procedure is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2222">A key aspect of the method is that the OPC diameter conversion and the optical simulations are treated consistently. The transformation from PSL-based optical diameters to dust geometric diameters depends on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while absorption is also directly controlled by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. To avoid a sequential inconsistency, we first retrieve the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the wavelength relevant for the OPC diameter conversion. This value is then used to convert the Fidas optical diameters into dust geometric diameters. The resulting dust PSD is subsequently used to retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the AE33 wavelengths.</p>
      <p id="d2e2253">Another key difference from the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.56"/> is that we define the cost function directly in terms of the truncated single scattering albedo, tssa. This choice is motivated by both the sensitivity of tssa to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the sampling configuration of the field experiment. The Fidas measured number size distributions through its own inlet over a broad optical-diameter range of approximately 0.2–19 µm, whereas the AE33 and nephelometer sampled through a common PM<sub>2.5</sub> inlet during the period used for the refractive-index retrieval. To make the Fidas PSD representative of the aerosol population sampled by the optical instruments, we applied an effective PM<sub>2.5</sub> cut-off to the converted dust geometric PSD. However, this procedure cannot fully reproduce possible differences in inlet transmission, size-dependent particle losses, counting efficiency, or absolute particle number between the Fidas and the optical sampling line.</p>
      <p id="d2e2284">We tested alternative cost functions incorporating additional information from the polar nephelometer, including a combined cost function based on quadratic departures of tssa and the backscatter fraction (BF). However, our dataset did not support a robust simultaneous retrieval of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This limitation likely reflects the combined sensitivity of the inversion to particle-shape assumptions, particle density, inlet cut-off modelling, and PSD uncertainties. In particular, closure tests comparing inversions based on tssa with inversions using extensive optical properties suggested a possible mismatch between the OPC-derived PSD and the aerosol population sampled by the nephelometer and aethalometer. Expressed as an equivalent scaling of the OPC particle number concentration, this mismatch was of the order of at least 20 % in some cases. Moreover, the spectral dependence of the required scaling suggests that the mismatch may not be a simple constant offset in particle number, but may include size-dependent effects, with larger discrepancies towards the lower and upper ends of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> size range.</p>
      <p id="d2e2310">Because the available data do not allow this potential mismatch to be quantified robustly, we use tssa in the cost function instead of relying on inversions based directly on extensive absorption and scattering coefficients. Since tssa is a ratio between truncated scattering and extinction, it is less sensitive to absolute concentration differences between the OPC and the optical instruments, while retaining sensitivity to the absorption-to-scattering balance controlled by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The drawback is that tssa is not sufficiently sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to support a robust simultaneous retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from this dataset. We therefore retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for a range of fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values representative of mineral dust, rather than solving for both parameters simultaneously. As shown in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>, the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is only weakly sensitive to the prescribed value of n within the plausible range tested here.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2367">Procedure to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The algorithm is done for every 15 min averaged measurement and for every shape, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, particle density and wavelength independently.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS1">
  <label>2.6.1</label><title>Estimation of the dust PSD</title>
      <p id="d2e2398">The number PSD measured by the Fidas is reported in terms of PSL-calibrated optical diameters. Since PSL particles are spherical and non-absorbing, whereas mineral dust particles are non-spherical and absorbing, these optical diameters must be converted into dust geometric diameters before being used in the retrieval. As described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.57"/>, we follow the general approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.58"/>, which compares the sideward scattered intensity expected for PSL particles with that expected for dust particles under prescribed assumptions for shape and refractive index.</p>
      <p id="d2e2407">The Fidas manufacturer does not provide the full spectral response of the light source or the detailed instrumental response function. Therefore, the Fidas was not treated as monochromatic. Instead, we inferred an effective Gaussian light-source spectrum by analysing the Fidas conversion software, which converts PSL-calibrated PSDs into PSDs for spherical aerosols with different refractive indices. Using the known side-scattering geometry of the instrument, (90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and a Lorenz–Mie scattering model, we optimized this effective spectrum to reproduce the manufacturer-provided conversions. The resulting spectrum was centred at 389 nm, with a standard deviation of 77 nm. The sideward scattered intensity used in the optical-to-geometric diameter conversion was then computed by integrating over this effective spectrum, rather than by assuming a single wavelength. Although this approach makes the conversion internally consistent with the manufacturer tables, uncertainty in the exact instrumental spectral response remains a limitation and may propagate into the converted PSD and the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2431">For PSL particles, the sideward scattered intensity was computed using Lorenz–Mie theory. For dust particles, the scattered intensity depends on the assumed particle shape and refractive index. We therefore performed the conversion for several prescribed particle-shape assumptions. These include spheres as a reference case (Sph); biaxial spheroids using aspect-ratio information derived from campaign-specific single-particle analyses by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.59"/> (Bi dist); the spheroid aspect-ratio distribution of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.60"/> and reported in the GRASP spheroid package, which is relevant for comparison with remote-sensing retrievals (Dub-06); triaxial ellipsoids from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.61"/> using also the campaign-specific median aspect ratio and a height-to-width ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.62"/>; and the six irregular dust shapes (A to F) from the MOPSMAP database <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.63"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2457">The single-shape calculations are not intended to represent the full atmospheric dust population. Instead, they are used as controlled sensitivity cases to quantify how different plausible particle morphologies affect the OPC diameter conversion and the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Where observationally or methodologically justified distributions are available, such as the campaign-derived spheroid distribution and the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.64"/> distribution, we use these distributions as more representative spheroidal cases.</p>
      <p id="d2e2471">The conversion from optical to geometric diameter was performed independently for each prescribed particle-shape assumption, particle density, and refractive-index configuration. For the retrieval, the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the effective OPC wavelength was first estimated consistently with the diameter conversion. Once this conversion was obtained, the resulting dust geometric PSD was used to simulate absorption and truncated scattering at the AE33 wavelengths and to retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at each wavelength.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS2">
  <label>2.6.2</label><title>Scattering and absorption simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e2496">For each prescribed particle-shape assumption, particle density, and real refractive index, the converted dust geometric PSD was used to simulate absorption and truncated scattering coefficients. Single-particle optical properties databases were obtained from the optical-property databases of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.65"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.66"/>, depending on the assumed particle shape. The simulated optical coefficients were then integrated over the converted PSD and over the size range corresponding to the PM<sub>2.5</sub> optical inlet.</p>
      <p id="d2e2514">For consistency with the measurements used in the retrieval, we simulated the angular response and truncation of the Aurora 4000 nephelometer rather than comparing the observations with a full-phase-function scattering coefficient. Specifically, the simulated scattering phase function was integrated over the nephelometer angular sensitivity following Eq. (11) of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.67"/>. This provided the simulated truncated scattering coefficient, directly comparable to the uncorrected nephelometer scattering coefficient, (tsca), defined in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>. The corresponding simulated truncated single scattering albedo, tssa was then calculated.</p>
      <p id="d2e2522">This use of truncated scattering avoids applying an additional correction from truncated to full-phase-function scattering in the retrieval itself, which would introduce further assumptions about particle shape and the scattering phase function.</p>
      <p id="d2e2525">The Fidas measures particles over a broader size range and through a different inlet than the optical instruments. Therefore, before computing the optical coefficients, the converted Fidas PSD was transformed into a PM<sub>2.5</sub>-equivalent PSD representative of the aerosol population sampled by the optical instruments. To do this, we applied an inlet transmission efficiency using a sigmoid function following the PM<sub>2.5</sub> URG model described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.68"/>, rather than imposing a sharp cut-off.</p>
      <p id="d2e2550">The inlet transmission was applied in aerodynamic-diameter space and then related to the dust geometric PSD. The conversion between aerodynamic and geometric diameter depends on particle density and particle shape. We computed this conversion following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.69"/>, based on the formulation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.70"/>, which accounts for the effects of particle density and dynamic shape factor. Thus, for each particle-shape assumption and particle density, the PM<sub>2.5</sub> inlet efficiency was mapped onto the corresponding dust geometric diameters and applied to the converted Fidas PSD before simulating absorption and truncated scattering.</p>
      <p id="d2e2568">Particle density affects the aerodynamic-to-geometric diameter conversion and therefore the effective upper diameter included in the PSD. We use a central density value of 2.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, derived from samples collected during the campaign, and perform sensitivity tests using 1.8 and 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These values are used to quantify the effect of density uncertainty on the PM<sub>2.5</sub>-equivalent PSD and on the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The retrieval is also repeated for the prescribed range of real refractive indices and for the lower, central, and upper values of the AE33 multiple-scattering correction parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), derived from the 95 % confidence interval reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.71"/>. These sensitivity tests quantify how uncertainties in particle density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, particle shape, inlet-efficiency mapping, and AE33 absorption correction propagate into the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2646">The retrieval is restricted to the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period because this period provides the longest and most stable dataset for matching the optical measurements with the Fidas PSD. Extending the retrieval to the PM<sub>10</sub> period would increase the sensitivity to large-particle sampling, inlet transmission, particle losses, and the validity range of the optical-property databases, and is therefore not attempted here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS3">
  <label>2.6.3</label><title>Minimization procedure</title>
      <p id="d2e2675">The minimization was performed independently for each AE33 wavelength using 15 min averaged measurements with collocated Fidas PSD, AE33 absorption, and nephelometer scattering data. The retrieval was restricted to periods classified as dust events during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> part of the campaign, following the criteria described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>.  For each time step, wavelength, prescribed particle-shape assumption, particle density, real refractive index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and AE33 correction case, we searched for the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that minimized the quadratic difference between the measurement-derived and simulated truncated single scattering albedo.

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M160" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tssa</mml:mi><mml:mtext>measured</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tssa</mml:mi><mml:mtext>simulated</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2758">The minimization was performed on a predefined grid of plausible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The algorithm therefore does not require an iterative stopping criterion: all grid values are evaluated, and the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to the minimum is retained as the retrieved value for that specific set of assumptions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2775">The real part of the refractive index was not retrieved simultaneously with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Instead, the retrieval was repeated for fixed values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 1.48 and 1.55, in increments of 0.005, following the range of values reported for mineral dust by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.72"/>. This choice reflects the limited sensitivity of tssa to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the uncertainties associated with using a Fidas PSD measured through a different inlet from the AE33 and nephelometer. The resulting dependence of retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the prescribed value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is evaluated in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2819">The retrieval was also repeated for the particle-shape assumptions described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS1"/>, for the particle densities described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS2"/>, and for the lower, central, and upper AE33 multiple-scattering correction cases. The resulting values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> should therefore be interpreted as conditional retrievals under prescribed assumptions for particle shape, particle density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and AE33 absorption correction. We do not retrieve particle shape, and the different shape assumptions are used to quantify the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the optical representation of dust morphology.</p>
      <p id="d2e2848">We performed Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs), described in the Supplement, to test the inversion method and to quantify the sensitivity of the retrieval to the main input variables and assumptions. The OSSEs use prescribed true values of the PSD, absorption coefficient, truncated scattering coefficient, particle density, particle shape, and refractive index, and then apply controlled perturbations to generate synthetic observations. These experiments illustrate the rationale for using the tssa-based cost function and the truncated-scattering observation operator, and evaluate how perturbations in abs, tsca, PSD, particle density, particle shape, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> propagate into the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2865">Importantly, the OSSEs distinguish between approximately uniform particle-number perturbations and size-dependent PSD-shape perturbations. They show that the tssa-based cost function reduces the sensitivity of retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to absolute particle-number mismatches because it is based on a ratio. However, they also show that size-dependent PSD-shape distortions can still introduce systematic uncertainty, because they modify the relative contribution of different particle sizes to absorption and truncated scattering. These experiments therefore support the interpretation of the retrieved values as conditional estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, rather than as a unique unconstrained retrieval of dust shape, PSD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2896">Using the campaign measurements as inputs for the retrieval we report two complementary estimates for each possible configuration. First, we retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the optical and PSD measurements averaged over all PM<sub>2.5</sub> dust-event periods. Second, we retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> independently for each 15 min dust-event interval and summarize the resulting distribution. The former provides a retrieval representative of the mean dust-event optical properties, whereas the latter quantifies the temporal variability of the retrievals during dust-event conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS4">
  <label>2.6.4</label><title>Retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from AERONET</title>
      <p id="d2e2938">To contextualize our in-situ retrievals, we derived a dust-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology from the AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) version 3, level 2.0 Almucantar retrievals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.73"/>. The purpose of this comparison is not to provide a strict validation of the in-situ retrievals, because AERONET products are column-integrated and retrieval-dependent, whereas our measurements are near-surface and source-region observations during a specific field campaign. Instead, the AERONET retrievals are used to place the campaign results in the context of longer-term dust-dominated retrievals from nearby and regional dust-source areas.</p>
      <p id="d2e2951">Dust-dominated AERONET retrievals were identified following the filtering methodology of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.74"/>, which applied a set of criteria to exclude retrievals contaminated by other absorbing aerosols, such as carbonaceous species. AERONET hourly retrievals were classified as dust events when the fine-mode volume fraction was below 10 %, ensuring that the dataset was dominated by coarse particles. We additionally required SSA to increase from 440 to 675 nm, a spectral behaviour characteristic of dust that helps distinguish it from fine anthropogenic aerosols and sea salt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.75"/>. To further reduce the influence of absorbing black and brown carbon, we excluded cases where the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at red and infrared wavelengths, calculated over 675, 870, and 1020 nm, exceeded 0.0042, following the threshold proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.76"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2970">Using this filtered dataset, we first computed the dust-specific climatology of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the Ouarzazate AERONET station, the closest site to our field measurements (160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> away). We then extended our analysis to major global dust source regions including western and eastern North Africa, the Sahel, the Arabian Peninsula, central Asia, and India, using the stations shown in Fig. S10a. For the regional analysis, the statistical metrics of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, including mean values and percentiles, were computed using optical depth weighting. This weighting gives greater influence to retrievals with larger dust optical depth and therefore better represents dust-dominated conditions.  For the comparison with our in-situ retrievals, the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved at the AE33 wavelengths were interpolated or extrapolated to the AERONET wavelengths of 440, 550, 675, 870, and 1020 nm. We compare AERONET-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> primarily with the in-situ retrievals obtained using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.77"/> spheroid aspect-ratio distribution, because this particle-shape representation is more consistent with assumptions used in AERONET-type retrievals. Other particle-shape assumptions are also shown to illustrate the sensitivity of the in-situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals to shape.</p>
      <p id="d2e3023">In addition to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we extracted the dust-filtered AERONET volume size distributions at Ouarzazate for qualitative comparison with the Fidas-derived PSDs measured during the campaign. This comparison is used only to assess potential differences in particle-size representativeness between the two datasets. The Fidas measurements represent near-surface in-situ PSDs at the source-region site and are restricted to the period and size range used in the retrieval, whereas AERONET size distributions are column-integrated and depend on the assumptions of the radiance inversion. Differences between the two PSDs can therefore contribute to discrepancies between in-situ and AERONET-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in addition to differences associated with particle shape, mineralogy, and possible residual aerosol contamination. This caveat is important because previous studies have shown that AERONET dust retrievals may be affected by uncertainties in the representation of coarse and super-coarse dust, with implications for retrieved absorption properties.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Overview of the optical properties during the measurement campaign</title>
      <p id="d2e3057">The campaign was characterized by generally calm conditions in the early morning, followed by stronger winds in the afternoon, leading to frequent local saltation and dust emission. This pattern followed the diurnal cycle of solar heating and the resulting destabilization of the near-surface atmospheric layers. On some days, the site was also influenced by the advection of local anthropogenic particles from up-river villages. Additionally, two intense cold pool outflows, referred to as haboobs, were recorded on 4 and 6 September 2019. A more detailed discussion of the atmospheric conditions, turbulence parameters, and dust fluxes during the campaign is provided in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.78"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3063">Two distinct measurement periods were defined based on the inlet cut-off of the optical measurements. During the initial part of the campaign, from 4 until 26 September 2019, the AE33 and nephelometer sampled through a PM<sub>2.5</sub> inlet. From 26 September 2019 until the end of the campaign, the optical measurements were performed using a PM<sub>10</sub> inlet. Figure S1 in the Supplement shows the temporal evolution of extensive and intensive optical properties, mass concentration, particle effective radius, wind speed, and friction velocity throughout the full campaign.</p>
      <p id="d2e3084">To analyze the dominant aerosol conditions during the measurement period, we identified three representative periods. Period A corresponds to local dust emissions on 21–22 September 2019. Period B corresponds to the haboob-driven dust event on 6–7 September 2019). Period C corresponds to a period influenced by anthropogenic pollution advection mixed with minor local dust emissions between 7 and 11 September 2019. These periods are highlighted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> and are used to illustrate the range of optical conditions observed during the campaign.</p>
      <p id="d2e3089">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> summarizes the time-averaged optical properties for the PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> periods, distinguishing between the full measurements, dust-event conditions, and the three defined periods. Dust events during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period were identified using three criteria: AAE above 1.5, SSAAE below 0, and a mass concentration above 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.79"/>. Extensive optical properties are presented with their standard errors. Intensive optical properties are summarized using two approaches: (i) averages weighted by the corresponding extensive properties, namely absorption, scattering, or extinction, and (ii) direct time averages with standard errors. The weighted averages emphasize conditions with elevated dust concentrations, while the direct averages reflect the overall variability  of the campaign. This variability is further showcased in Figs. S2–S5.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3148">Summary of mean values and standard errors for the measured and computed optical properties described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> during the full period, dust events, and during the three specific periods (A, B, C). Data are presented as time averages (regular font) and weighted means (italic font). Results are categorized by inlet cut-off periods: PM<sub>2.5</sub> (from 4 September 2019 00:00 UTC to 26 September 2019 12:00 UTC) and PM<sub>10</sub> (from 26 September 2019 12:00 UTC to the end of the measurements). The number of measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) corresponds to the 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averages used in the analysis.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">PM<sub>2.5</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">PM<sub>10</sub></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">units</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Full Period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Dust Events</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Period A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Period B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Period C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Full period</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2156</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1160</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">379</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">464</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">M m<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.29</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.89</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.69</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.53</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">M m<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">M m<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83.72</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">162.77</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">114.16</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">616.23</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">214.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.70</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">92.90</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Bscat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">M m<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.09</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.32</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.31</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.91</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.38</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">#</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43.14</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56.33</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.97</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">153.17</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.93</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">51.14</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">192.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.09</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>0.469</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>0.545</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>0.528</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>0.579</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.417</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>1.649</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.445</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.525</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.009</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.517</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.564</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.420</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.604</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>0.154</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>0.141</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>0.137</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>0.134</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.182</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.019</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.203</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.085</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.167</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.051</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.164</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.038</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.157</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.041</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.216</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.091</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.021</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>0.039</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>0.014</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>0.011</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>0.006</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.005</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.002</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.038</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.033</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.009</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.013</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.008</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.042</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.047</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.033</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MSE</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>3.41</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>3.67</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>3.19</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>3.73</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>3.25</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.396</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.19</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.31</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MEE</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>3.67</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>3.45</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>2.76</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>3.09</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>3.34</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.330</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.338</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MEE</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>3.60</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>3.48</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>2.81</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>3.51</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>2.63</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.391</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.91</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.366</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>0.952</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>0.952</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>0.952</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>0.954</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.951</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.948</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.949</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.016</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.948</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.016</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.951</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.948</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.948</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.935</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.067</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>0.985</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>0.989</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>0.988</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>0.990</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.977</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.986</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.973</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.986</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.986</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.988</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.968</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.972</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.056</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>0.995</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>0.998</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>0.997</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>0.998</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.990</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.996</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.985</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.014</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.996</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.996</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.997</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.981</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.014</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.987</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.046</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>370–950</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>3.02</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>3.78</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>3.52</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>4.21</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>2.34</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>3.28</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.24</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.81</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>450–635</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.010</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.100</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.077</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.183</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.214</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.092</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.019</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.038</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.131</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.021</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.433</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.022</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.174</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SSAAE</mml:mi><mml:mtext>370–950</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.039</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.046</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.044</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.048</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.037</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>0.051</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.038</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.046</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.044</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.048</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.037</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.059</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>0.109</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>0.102</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>0.109</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>0.096</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.121</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.125</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.130</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.112</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.117</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.102</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.135</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.140</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">525</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>0.680</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>0.699</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>0.684</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>0.701</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>0.654</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>0.654</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.639</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.679</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.673</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.694</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.627</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.631</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sph</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>1.15</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>1.29</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>0.85</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">520</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">triax</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>1.59</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>1.78</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>1.12</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.83</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.62</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e6339">Period A, dominated by local dust emissions, closely resembles the average dust-event conditions, confirming that such local emissions were common during the campaign. Period B, corresponding to the haboob event, exhibits intensive optical properties similar to those of Period A, but with substantially larger extensive optical properties because of the higher dust mass concentration. In contrast, Period C, influenced by anthropogenic pollution, shows lower mass concentrations and therefore lower absorption and scattering coefficients. However, it exhibits much higher mass absorption efficiencies, particularly at longer wavelengths. This indicates an enhanced contribution of fine carbonaceous particles to the optical properties measured at the site during periods of weak easterly winds and limited local dust emission, as discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.80"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6345">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> show that, during PM<sub>2.5</sub> dust events, SSA was around 0.955 at 370 nm, 0.985 at 550 nm and 0.993 at 880 nm. During the same conditions, AAE values were elevated relative to anthropogenic-dominated periods and SAE remained below 0, consistent with a dominant contribution from coarse mineral dust and stronger absorption at shorter wavelengths. Brief decreases in effective radius, accompanied by dips in SSA and increases in SAE and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, again suggest intermittent advection of anthropogenic particles to the site during periods of low wind speed and weak dust emission. For PM<sub>10</sub>, SSA was lower, with values of approximately 0.945 at 370 nm, 0.974 at 550 nm and 0.984 at 880 nm (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e6380">A comparison with other dust SSA measurements compiled in Table S1 of the Supplement  of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.81"/> shows that our PM<sub>10</sub> results lie well within the general range of Saharan dust SSA values reported by previous in-situ and remote-sensing studies. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.82"/> reported an SSA of 0.957 at 537 nm in Tinfou and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.83"/> reported an SSA of 0.971 at 550 nm in Western Sahara. As expected, the PM<sub>2.5</sub>-based values in our study, which emphasize the finer fraction of the sampled dust, tend towards slightly higher SSA at near-infrared wavelengths.</p>
      <p id="d2e6410">Many of the measurements compiled in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.84"/> correspond to broader particle size ranges or to long-range transported dust. Such differences can affect SSA because the inclusion of coarser particles, as well as changes in particle morphology, composition, and mixing state during transport, can modify both scattering and absorption. The effect of particle size on the optical properties measured during our campaign is analysed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>. Furthermore, Table S1 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.85"/> includes dust sampled across regions where mineralogy and aerosol mixing states can differ from freshly emitted dust in southeastern Morocco, including samples collected far from the source area, such as Cabo Verde, the Canary Islands, the Atlantic outflow and the West Mediterranean. Therefore, although our SSA measurements overlap with previous studies, differences in size range, sampling region, dust ageing, and possible aerosol mixing must be considered when comparing results across datasets.</p>
      <p id="d2e6421">The mass efficiencies, MAE, MSE and MEE, show strong sensitivity to inlet cut-off, with variations approaching 1 order of magnitude.  This is expected because most of the mass concentration of mineral dust is found in the coarse fraction. The MAE obtained here for dust events during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, 0.141 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 370 nm, is higher than the value reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.86"/> for Saharan dust, 0.107 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 375 nm, but much lower than the value reported for Sahelian dust, 0.711 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 375 nm. This comparison illustrates the large variability in dust absorption efficiency across source regions. The asymmetry parameter and backscatter fraction during dust events, 0.68 and 0.11, respectively, fall within the range reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.87"/> for Saharan dust, 0.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 and 0.094 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.014, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e6515">The higher absorption efficiency in Period C is associated with the presence of anthropogenic aerosol particles, particularly between midnight and noon. This interpretation is supported by AAE and SAE values close to 1, SSAAE values close to zero or positive, a significantly smaller effective radius compared with dust events (0.42 vs 0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and a lower SSA at 880 nm of around 0.978. Together, these features indicate a larger relative contribution of fine particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.88"/> and a higher apparent imaginary refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Consistently, the mass absorption efficiency strongly increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.141 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.182 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6573">Although the average of the full measurement period exhibits a clear dust optical signature, the overall values are influenced by Period C. This highlights that, even at remote and relatively isolated dust-source locations, regional and local anthropogenic pollution can impact dust measurements.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e6578">Time evolution of key optical and physical properties during the highlighted measurement periods: <bold>(a)</bold> Period A (midnight 21 September to morning 22 September 2019), <bold>(b)</bold> Period B (midnight 6 September to morning 7 September 2019), and <bold>(c)</bold> Period C (midnight 7 September to noon 11 September 2019). Each row represents the time series of: absorption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and scattering (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) coefficients at 370 and 880 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); mass absorption, scattering, and extinction efficiency (MAE, MSE, MEE) at 370 and 880 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; single scattering albedo (SSA) at 370 and 880 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; absorption, scattering, and SSA Ångström exponents (AAE, SAE, SSAAE); and the estimated imaginary part of the refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for spheres (solid line), triaxial ellipsoids (dashed line), and a range of values for other shape assumptions described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/> </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6683">The last row of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> illustrates the temporal evolution of the conditionally estimated imaginary part of the complex refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for different shape assumptions: spheres (solid line), triaxial ellipsoids (dashed line), and the full range of values considered in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>. During dust events, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> remains relatively stable. In contrast, Period C and the calm wind phases of Periods A and B exhibit increases of up to an order of magnitude, highlighting the stronger influence of absorbing anthropogenic particles during these periods. These <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates are used here diagnostically to interpret the temporal variability of the optical measurements; the dust-event retrievals and their sensitivity to particle shape, density, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are analysed in detail in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Optical properties and their relationship with effective radius</title>
      <p id="d2e6737">At this measurement site, mineral dust fluxes, wind friction velocity, and particle size are closely interrelated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.89"/>. In this section, we examine the dependence of the observed optical properties on the effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, cf. Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). The campaign consisted of two distinct measurement periods with different inlet cut-offs (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>), which strongly influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because coarse particles dominate the mass during dust emission events.</p>
      <p id="d2e6786">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> shows the absorption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and scattering (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) coefficients, and SSA as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The upper panels correspond to the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, while the lower panels represent the PM<sub>10</sub> period. The average absorption Ångström exponent, AAE, for each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin is also indicated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a, d. For the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits a non-monotonic U-shaped dependence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, initially decreasing until the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin and then increasing again for larger sizes. In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases consistently for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. SSA also shows a clear dependence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with distinct spectral behaviour between the PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> periods.</p>
      <p id="d2e6976">The observed U-shaped dependence in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period reflects the varying contribution of different aerosol sources. The smallest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, associated with AAE values close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1,  correspond to periods influenced by transported fine carbonaceous particles. Larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are associated with local and nearby dust emissions. At small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases as SSA increases, despite similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values across the first three size bins. For larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SSA stabilizes and both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase with dust abundance. The spectral dependence of SSA during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period is therefore consistent with a transition from conditions influenced by fine carbonaceous aerosols to conditions dominated by coarser mineral dust. The PM<sub>10</sub> period exhibits optical behaviour consistent with the larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, reflecting the stronger influence of coarse dust when the broader inlet cut-off is used.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e7137">Mean and standard error (se) values of the absorption <bold>(a, d)</bold> and scattering <bold>(b, e)</bold> coefficients, and the single scattering albedo (SSA; <bold>c</bold>, <bold>f</bold>) as a function of wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis) and effective radius (colour scale) at M'Hammid for both PM<sub>2.5</sub> (upper panel) and PM<sub>10</sub> (lower panel) periods. The log-log plot highlights the enhanced absorption efficiency of dust at short-UV wavelengths, where absorption increases more significantly compared to longer wavelengths. In contrast, BC-influenced particles typically exhibit a nearly linear spectral dependence. The absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) values are indicated along each absorption coefficient curve: from between 1.5 and 1.7 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to 4.7 for the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and with a range between 2.3 and 3.1 for PM<sub>10</sub>. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e7228">The spectral dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SSA is further examined through their respective Ångström exponents (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). The AAE increases with effective radius, particularly during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values above 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where it rises from approximately 1.2 to 2.5. This trend is consistent with increasing friction velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating stronger local dust emissions. Figure S7 further shows that, during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with wind friction velocity is also associated to higher AAE values. In contrast, during the PM<sub>10</sub> period, AAE exhibits a more gradual and steady increase with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7349">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> also shows a strong relationship between SAE and effective radius. During the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, SAE decreases markedly, from around 1 to values near or below 0, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases. During the PM<sub>10</sub> period, the high concentration of coarse particles keeps SAE consistently low, generally below 0. Negative SSAAE values have been recognized as a key indicator of Saharan dust events over Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.90"/>, and this criterion is met for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values above 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period and throughout the PM<sub>10</sub> period.</p>
      <p id="d2e7426">Overall, these results indicate that during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, when the optical instruments sampled a narrower size range, the dust optical signature became prominent mainly under strong emission conditions. In contrast, during the PM<sub>10</sub> period, the inclusion of coarser particles produced a consistently stronger dust optical signature, significantly shaping the spectral behaviour of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SSA.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e7471">Scatter plot of the Absorption Ångström Exponent, AAE <bold>(a, d)</bold>, the Scattering Ångström Exponent, SAE <bold>(b, e)</bold>, and the single-scattering albedo Ångström exponent (SSAAE) as a function of the particle effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis – at M'Hammid for both PM<sub>2.5</sub> (upper panel) and PM<sub>10</sub> (lower panel) periods. The colour scale indicates the  average friction velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin, with this averaging resulting in the smaller range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Bins were determined using the Freedman-Diaconis rule <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.91"/> to ensure an optimal balance between resolution and statistical robustness.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e7560">Additionally, we computed two key parameters related to the scattering phase function of the particles: the backscatter fraction (BF) and the asymmetry parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>, forward scattering increases with particle effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as indicated by increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreasing BF. The spectral dependence of these parameters also shifts as particles become coarser, with the slope of BF transitioning from negative to positive and that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from positive to negative. This indicates that finer particles exhibit stronger backscattering at shorter wavelengths, while coarser particles favour forward scattering. During the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, BF decreases from approximately 0.10 at the shortest nephelometer wavelength to approximately 0.09 at the longest wavelength, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases from approximately 0.68 to 0.70. During the PM<sub>10</sub> period, these spectral variations are less pronounced, with BF values ranging between 0.12 and 0.16 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values between 0.6 and 0.64. These values are consistent with previous measurements of Saharan dust. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.92"/> reported (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) values from about 0.75 to 0.65 and BF values from about 0.07 to 0.12 for Saharan dust advected to the western Mediterranean, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.93"/> reported (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from airborne measurements within the Saharan Aerosol Layer over the Atlantic.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e7683">Mean (lines) and standard error (se, shaded colours) values of the backscatter fraction, BF <bold>(a, c)</bold> and the asymmetry parameter <bold>(b, d)</bold> as a function of the wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis in logarithmic scale) and the effective radius (colour scale) at M'Hammid for both PM<sub>2.5</sub> (upper panel) and PM<sub>10</sub> (lower panel) periods.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e7723">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> shows the mass absorption, scattering, and extinction efficiencies as a function of wavelength and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Regardless of the inlet cut-off period, MAE consistently decreases as particle size increases. During the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, noting the logarithmic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis, MAE values drop by approximately 1 order of magnitude, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.30 to 0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at short-UV wavelengths and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 to 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at near-infrared wavelengths. This decrease reflects the lower absorption per unit mass of larger mineral dust particles compared with smaller particles, which include a greater relative contribution from fine absorbing aerosols during some periods.</p>
      <p id="d2e7810">The scattering and extinction efficiencies show a different behaviour across the two inlet cut-off periods. During the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, MSE decreases with wavelength for particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with the stronger scattering efficiency of fine particles at shorter wavelengths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.94"/>. For coarser particles within the PM<sub>2.5</sub>, MSE remains more similar across wavelengths. During the PM<sub>10</sub> period, MSE declines significantly, both compared to the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period and as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases. This behaviour reflects the shifting peak scattering efficiency toward longer wavelengths, beyond the measurement range of this study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.95"/>. The combined effects of absorption and scattering efficiencies are captured in the MEE trend (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c, f), which highlight the distinct optical behaviour of different aerosol regimes: fine particles exhibit higher MAE and MSE, whereas coarser dust particles contribute more strongly to total scattering.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e7892">Mean and standard error (se) values of the mass absorption, MAE <bold>(a, d)</bold>, scattering, MSE <bold>(b, e)</bold>, and extinction, MEE <bold>(c, f)</bold> efficiency as a function of the wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis in logarithmic scale  and the effective radius (colour scale) at M'Hammid for both PM<sub>2.5</sub> (upper panel) and PM<sub>10</sub> (lower panel) periods. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Imaginary part of the refractive index of mineral dust</title>
      <p id="d2e7944">This section presents the retrieval of the imaginary part of the complex refractive index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for mineral dust, following the methodology described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>. The analysis focuses exclusively on periods classified as dust events (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>) during the PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurement period. As discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>, the retrieved values should be interpreted as conditional estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> under prescribed assumptions for particle shape, particle density, the real part of the refractive index, and the AE33 absorption correction.</p>
      <p id="d2e7977">Two complementary retrieval averages are reported. First, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was retrieved independently for each 15 min dust-event interval. The temporal average of these retrievals is referred to as the average of the retrievals. Second, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was retrieved from the time-averaged dust-event measurements of truncated scattering, absorption, and PSD. This single estimate is referred to as the retrieval of the average. The first approach gives equal weight to each dust-event interval, whereas the second gives greater influence to periods with larger dust loading and more representative mean optical properties.</p>
      <p id="d2e7994">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> summarizes the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Panel (a) shows the spectral dependence of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for different particle-shape assumptions using the central values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the central AE33 correction. The particle-shape assumptions include spheres (Sph), biaxial spheroids using the aspect-ratio distribution measured during the campaign by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.96"/> (Bi dist; including oblate and prolate spheroids), biaxial spheroids using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.97"/> aspect-ratio distribution (Dub-06), triaxial ellipsoids with aspect ratio 1.46 and height-to-width ratio 0.45 (Tri), and the six irregular shapes A–F from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.98"/>. The values reported for the Moroccan sample by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.99"/> are also shown for comparison.</p>
      <p id="d2e8070">Panels (b)–(d) of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> show the distributions of 15 min retrievals for spheres, biaxial spheroids, and triaxial ellipsoids. Each distribution includes the variability arising from the range of prescribed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) values, from 1.48 to 1.55 in increments of 0.005, and the three particle-density assumptions, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2.15, and 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The red symbols indicate the retrieval of the average for the central value of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the error bars show the variability introduced by the lower and upper (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) values derived from the 95 % confidence interval of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.100"/>. The corresponding results for the individual irregular shapes are provided in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d2e8133">Across the five shortest AE33 wavelengths, all shape assumptions show an overall decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing wavelength, consistent with stronger absorption by iron-bearing minerals at shorter wavelengths. The dB19 values for the Moroccan sample fall within the range of our retrievals, except at 950 nm, where their retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases against the general decreasing trend. The slope of the dB19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum is somewhat steeper at shorter wavelengths than in our retrievals.</p>
      <p id="d2e8157">Several factors may explain differences between our estimates and those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.101"/>. First, the samples and measurement conditions differ: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.102"/> analysed resuspended dust under controlled chamber conditions, whereas our retrievals are based on ambient, freshly emitted dust measured in the field. Second, the sampled size ranges differ. Our retrieval is based on the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, whereas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.103"/> used PM<sub>10</sub> measurements. This difference can influence the retrieval if particle composition, shape, or density varies with size, even though our inversion assumes size-independent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Third, in our field setup, the Fidas PSD and the optical measurements were obtained through different sampling lines, which introduces additional uncertainty in the absolute PSD–optical closure. Finally, our procedure applies a consistent Fidas optical-to-geometric diameter conversion for each prescribed particle-shape and refractive-index assumption, whereas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.104"/> used a prescribed refractive-index range for the OPC conversion. The OSSE tests in the Supplement indicate that this latter difference has a relatively small effect when the assumed particle shape is consistent.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e8200">Imaginary part of the complex refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of wavelength. <bold>(a)</bold> Coloured lines indicate the average of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved for each timestamp for which there was dust emission under different shape assumptions, spheres, bi-axial, tri-axial and irregular shapes – A to F from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.105"/> – using the best-estimate real refractive index (1.49) and a particle density of 2.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.106"/> for the Morocco sample as dB19; <bold>(b–d)</bold> Distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for spheres <bold>(b)</bold>, biaxial ellipsoids <bold>(c)</bold>, and triaxial ellipsoids <bold>(d)</bold> during dust events, showing the mean (dot), median (square), and 5th to 95th percentiles (flat segments). The red dots in <bold>(b)</bold>–<bold>(d)</bold> represent the mean of the retrievals of the average for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values obtained in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.107"/> with the error bar showcasing the variability introduced by using an upper/lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> based on its CI. Each distribution reflects the range of retrievals for various real refractive index values and particle density assumptions, highlighting the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to shape and measurement parameters.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e8308">A notable difference is observed between the average of the retrievals and the retrieval of the average in panels (b)–(d) of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>. The average of the 15 min retrievals is generally larger than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained from the time-averaged dust-event measurements, especially at longer wavelengths. This behaviour is also evident in Fig. S8. We attribute this difference to the disproportionate influence of short periods with lower dust concentration and stronger relative contribution from absorbing non-dust aerosols. When each 15 min interval is weighted equally, these periods can raise the average retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the retrieval of the average is more strongly influenced by high-dust periods, such as the haboob event, which exhibit higher SSA in the near-infrared and infrared and are more representative of mineral dust optical properties.</p>
      <p id="d2e8327">The violin plots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> illustrate the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to particle density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure S9 shows the violin plots also for irregular shapes A–F from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.108"/>. Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> provide the corresponding numerical values. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at selected wavelengths for the three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaged over all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> reports <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaged over the different dust particle density assumptions. Both tables include results for a subset of particle shapes; the complete wavelength range is available in Tables S1–S10.</p>
      <p id="d2e8410">The results show a clear dependence of retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the assumed particle density. Lower particle densities lead to lower retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas higher particle densities lead to higher retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This sensitivity arises because particle density affects the aerodynamic-to-geometric conversion used to map the PM<sub>2.5</sub> inlet efficiency onto the dust geometric PSD. As a result, the effective size distribution used in the optical simulations changes with the prescribed density.</p>
      <p id="d2e8443">The sensitivity to the assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is weaker. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases slightly with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values occurring at the lower end of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range. For example, varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1.48 to 1.55 causes changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the order of 0.0002 at 370 nm for irregular particles. This sensitivity is modest compared with the effects of particle density and shape, and values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for mineral dust are typically confined to a narrower range than would be required to produce large changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This supports the use of fixed, plausible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values rather than attempting a simultaneous retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the present field dataset.</p>
      <p id="d2e8534">The third factor explored in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> is particle shape.  Particle-shape assumptions exert a substantial influence on the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For a given wavelength and set of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> assumptions, non-spherical particles generally require larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values than spheres to reproduce the observed (tssa). This is particularly evident for triaxial ellipsoids and for the more elongated or irregular MOPSMAP shapes. To quantify the relationship between particle morphology and retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we use the ratio of volume-equivalent to cross-section-equivalent particle radii, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.109"/>. Lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values indicate more non-spherical particles. Shapes C, D, and F, as well as the triaxial ellipsoids, have lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than spheres, biaxial spheroids, and some of the less elongated irregular shapes, and they yield higher retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This outcome is consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.110"/>, who demonstrated through numerical experiments that greater particle non-sphericity leads to higher retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e8637">Imaginary part of the complex refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) retrieved for the same shape assumptions as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> as a function of the asphericity of the particles as defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.111"/>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for three wavelengths (370, 520 and 880 nm) for the retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the averaged optical values (triangles) and for the temporal average of the retrievals filtered for dust events (points).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e8676">This relationship is further illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>, which shows the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A near linear tendency is observed (with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), i.e. to more non-spherical particles. The slope of this relationship becomes weaker at longer wavelengths. While this relationship appears consistent, it is based on a limited number of data points, and any extrapolation should therefore be treated with caution. Nonetheless, establishing a robust connection between particle non-sphericity and retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> could provide a valuable tool for reinterpreting past measurements and datasets – many of which rely on spherical particle assumptions – within the context of more realistic, non-spherical dust models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.112"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. For the central assumptions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved using triaxial ellipsoids can be substantially higher than that retrieved using spherical particles, with the largest relative differences occurring at shorter wavelengths, up to 46 %, and smaller differences at longer wavelengths, up to 10 %.</p>
      <p id="d2e8738">This apparent relationship between non-sphericity and retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> should be interpreted with caution because it is based on a limited set of prescribed shape assumptions. The single irregular shapes are sensitivity cases rather than realistic descriptions of the full atmospheric dust population. Nevertheless, the result demonstrates that particle-shape representation can substantially affect retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Establishing a more robust link between particle morphology and retrieved absorption properties could help reinterpret past datasets that relied on spherical assumptions and improve the treatment of non-spherical dust in remote-sensing retrievals and climate-model optical-property parametrizations.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e8758">Imaginary part of the complex refractive index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for periods characterized as <italic>dust events</italic> throughout the PM<sub>2.5</sub> part of the campaign. The retrieval of the averaged optical measurements is shown in bold, while the 5th percentile, the mean, and the 95th percentile of the distribution from the 15 min retrievals are shown within the parenthesis. All retrievals in this table were computed under the assumption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and they are shown multiplied by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for clarity. They have been obtained for different shapes: spheres, distributions of biaxial ellipsoids, spheroid shape distribution from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.113"/>, the triaxial ellipsoid shape, and the average of the A to F irregular shapes from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.114"/>; for 3 wavelengths ranging between the near-UV to the near-infrared and 3 different mineral dust particle density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shape</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 2.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spheres</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.99</bold> (1.34–2.30–3.47)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>2.22</bold> (1.48–2.57–3.88)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>2.44</bold> (1.63–2.82–4.25)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.93</bold> (0.54–1.19–2.12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.04</bold> (0.60–1.33–2.38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.15</bold> (0.66–1.47–2.63)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.28</bold> (0.10–0.50–1.12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.30</bold> (0.10–0.55–1.24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.33</bold> (0.10–0.60–1.34)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biaxial dist</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.97</bold> (1.34–2.27–3.39)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>2.20</bold> (1.48–2.54–3.80)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>2.43</bold> (1.62–2.79–4.00)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.93</bold> (0.54–1.19–2.11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.04</bold> (0.60–1.33–2.36)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.15</bold> (0.67–1.46–2.60)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.28</bold> (0.10–0.51–1.14)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.31</bold> (0.10–0.56–1.24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.34</bold> (0.10–0.60–1.34)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dub–06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>2.34</bold> (1.58–2.68–4.00)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>2.59</bold> (1.74–2.97–4.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>2.82</bold> (1.90–3.25–5.00)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.11</bold> (0.64–1.42–2.49)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.24</bold> (0.72–1.57–2.78)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.35</bold> (0.78–1.72–3.04)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.32</bold> (0.10–0.57–1.28)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.35</bold> (0.10–0.62–1.38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.37</bold> (0.10–0.66–1.47)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Triaxial</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>3.00</bold> (2.06–3.38–5.00)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>3.34</bold> (2.28–3.76–5.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>3.66</bold> (2.50–4.12–6.50)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.28</bold> (0.72–1.63–2.89)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.45</bold> (0.82–1.83–3.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.61</bold> (0.90–2.02–3.58)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.21</bold> (0.10–0.53–1.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.26</bold> (0.10–0.59–1.38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.31</bold> (0.10–0.64–1.50)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Irregular</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>2.27</bold> (1.62–2.80–4.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>2.49</bold> (1.76–3.05–4.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>2.72</bold> (1.88–3.30–5.00)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.08</bold> (0.66–1.46–2.60)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.19</bold> (0.72–1.60–2.86)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.30</bold> (0.78–1.74–3.10)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.31</bold> (0.10–0.59–1.28)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.34</bold> (0.10–0.64–1.38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.36</bold> (0.10–0.68–1.48)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="T3" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e9272">Imaginary part of the complex refractive index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the same table structure as in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> but fixing the best estimate of the particle density to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g cm<sup>−3</sup> and varying the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 8 different values. Please note the in the table <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is multiplied by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shape</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spheres</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>2.24</bold> (1.54–2.59–3.99)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>2.22</bold> (1.57–2.61–3.84)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>2.2</bold> (1.44–2.51–3.83)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>2.18</bold> (1.5–2.51–3.85)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>2.16</bold> (1.52–2.53–3.72)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>2.15</bold> (1.4–2.44–3.72)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>2.13</bold> (1.45–2.45–3.73)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>2.12</bold> (1.48–2.46–3.6)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.05</bold> (0.62–1.35–2.29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.04</bold> (0.61–1.32–2.37)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.03</bold> (0.56–1.33–2.47)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>1.01</bold> (0.6–1.3–2.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>1</bold> (0.58–1.27–2.27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.99</bold> (0.54–1.28–2.37)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>0.98</bold> (0.58–1.25–2.12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.97</bold> (0.56–1.22–2.18)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.31</bold> (0.1–0.55–1.27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.55–1.24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.55–1.14)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.54–1.24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.54–1.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.53–1.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>0.29</bold> (0.1–0.52–1.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.28</bold> (0.1–0.52–1.17)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biaxial dist</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>2.22</bold> (1.52–2.56–3.9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>2.2</bold> (1.56–2.57–3.76)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>2.18</bold> (1.42–2.48–3.74)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>2.16</bold> (1.48–2.48–3.76)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>2.14</bold> (1.51–2.49–3.64)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>2.12</bold> (1.39–2.4–3.63)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>2.1</bold> (1.44–2.4–3.63)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>2.08</bold> (1.46–2.42–3.52)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.05</bold> (0.64–1.35–2.27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.04</bold> (0.62–1.32–2.34)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.03</bold> (0.57–1.32–2.44)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>1.01</bold> (0.6–1.3–2.18)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>1.01</bold> (0.6–1.27–2.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.99</bold> (0.55–1.27–2.35)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>0.98</bold> (0.58–1.25–2.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.97</bold> (0.57–1.22–2.18)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.31</bold> (0.1–0.56–1.28)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.31</bold> (0.1–0.56–1.24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.31</bold> (0.1–0.55–1.15)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.55–1.24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.55–1.22)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.54–1.12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.53–1.22)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.3</bold> (0.1–0.53–1.2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dub–06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>2.62</bold> (1.82–3–4.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>2.59</bold> (1.82–3.02–4.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>2.55</bold> (1.66–2.9–4.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>2.53</bold> (1.76–2.89–4.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>2.51</bold> (1.76–2.91–4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>2.47</bold> (1.61–2.8–4.27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>2.45</bold> (1.7–2.8–4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>2.42</bold> (1.7–2.81–4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.25</bold> (0.76–1.59–2.65)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.24</bold> (0.74–1.56–2.78)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.23</bold> (0.68–1.56–2.85)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>1.21</bold> (0.72–1.54–2.55)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>1.19</bold> (0.7–1.5–2.68)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>1.17</bold> (0.65–1.5–2.74)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>1.17</bold> (0.7–1.48–2.45)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>1.15</bold> (0.68–1.45–2.58)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.35</bold> (0.1–0.62–1.42)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.35</bold> (0.1–0.62–1.38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.35</bold> (0.1–0.62–1.28)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.35</bold> (0.1–0.61–1.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>0.34</bold> (0.1–0.61–1.36)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.34</bold> (0.1–0.61–1.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>0.34</bold> (0.1–0.6–1.38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.33</bold> (0.1–0.6–1.34)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Triaxial</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>3.36</bold> (2.34–3.78–5.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>3.34</bold> (2.33–3.83–5.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>3.32</bold> (2.17–3.69–6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>3.29</bold> (2.3–3.7–5.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>3.26</bold> (2.27–3.73–5.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>3.23</bold> (2.11–3.6–5.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>3.21</bold> (2.24–3.6–5.25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>3.17</bold> (2.21–3.63–5)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.46</bold> (0.83–1.85–3.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.45</bold> (0.82–1.82–3.26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.45</bold> (0.77–1.83–3.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>1.43</bold> (0.81–1.81–3.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>1.42</bold> (0.8–1.78–3.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>1.41</bold> (0.75–1.79–3.33)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>1.4</bold> (0.79–1.77–2.98)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>1.39</bold> (0.78–1.75–3.12)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.26</bold> (0.1–0.58–1.42)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.26</bold> (0.1–0.59–1.37)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.26</bold> (0.1–0.59–1.29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.26</bold> (0.1–0.58–1.42)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>0.26</bold> (0.1–0.59–1.37)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.26</bold> (0.1–0.59–1.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>0.26</bold> (0.1–0.58–1.43)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.26</bold> (0.1–0.59–1.37)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Irregular</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">370.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>2.52</bold> (1.78–3.08–4.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>2.49</bold> (1.78–3.10–5.00)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>2.47</bold> (1.70–2.98–4.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>2.44</bold> (1.72–2.99–4.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>2.42</bold> (1.74–3.01–4.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>2.40</bold> (1.66–2.89–4.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>2.37</bold> (1.66–2.89–4.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>2.34</bold> (1.68–2.90–4.50)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">520.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.21</bold> (0.74–1.62–2.76)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.19</bold> (0.72–1.59–2.88)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.18</bold> (0.70–1.60–2.96)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>1.16</bold> (0.72–1.58–2.68)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>1.15</bold> (0.70–1.55–2.78)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>1.14</bold> (0.68–1.55–2.86)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>1.13</bold> (0.70–1.53–2.58)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>1.12</bold> (0.68–1.50–2.68)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.34</bold> (0.10–0.63–1.50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.34</bold> (0.10–0.64–1.42)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.34</bold> (0.10–0.64–1.32)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.33</bold> (0.10–0.63–1.48)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>0.33</bold> (0.10–0.63–1.41)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.33</bold> (0.10–0.63–1.30)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>0.33</bold> (0.10–0.62–1.44)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.33</bold> (0.10–0.62–1.38)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Comparison with dust-dominated AERONET retrievals</title>
      <p id="d2e10263">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/> compares our in-situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates, extrapolated to the AERONET wavelengths of 440, 550, 675, 870, and 1020 nm, with dust-filtered AERONET retrievals compiled over two decades from several mid-latitude dust emission regions. These include Ouarzazate (OUARZ), western and eastern North Africa (WNAFR, ENAFR), the Sahel (SAHEL), the Arabian Peninsula (ARPEN), central Asia (CASIA), and India (INDIA). The selected AERONET stations are shown in Fig. S10a. Our in-situ retrievals are shown for four particle shape assumptions: spheres, biaxial ellipsoids with aspect ratios from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.115"/>, biaxial ellipsoids with aspect ratios from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.116"/>, and triaxial ellipsoids. The comparison with the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.117"/> spheroid distribution is included to provide a shape assumption more consistent with AERONET-type retrievals, while the other shape assumptions illustrate the sensitivity of the in-situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates to particle morphology.</p>
      <p id="d2e10292">Due to differences in spatio-temporal representativeness and observational context, a strict quantitative comparison between AERONET and in-situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values is not appropriate. AERONET retrievals are column-integrated and rely on inversion assumptions regarding particle size, shape, and refractive index, whereas our estimates are based on near-surface, source-region measurements during a specific field campaign and are restricted to the PM<sub>2.5</sub> dust-event period. Differences in the vertical distribution of dust, the sampled size range, particle ageing, mineralogical composition, and possible aerosol mixing can all affect the comparison. The AERONET comparison is therefore used here to provide context rather than direct validation of the in-situ retrievals.</p>
      <p id="d2e10311">Despite these caveats, our retrievals show qualitative agreement with the AERONET retrievals from OUARZ, the closest AERONET station to the measurement site. The strongest overlap occurs for the more non-spherical shape assumptions, for instance triaxial ellipsoids and the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.118"/> spheroid distribution. Median values are particularly close at 550 and 675 nm, and the full distributions show some overlap at longer wavelengths. At 440 nm, however, our in-situ estimates diverge more noticeably from the AERONET retrievals. When spherical particles are assumed, the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are generally lower than both the non-spherical in-situ retrievals and the AERONET values from OUARZ, especially at shorter wavelengths.</p>
      <p id="d2e10324">A key feature of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/> is the pronounced regional variability in AERONET-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases progressively from western to eastern North Africa and further across the Sahel, reaching even higher values in central Asia and India. These differences are likely driven in part by regional variations in dust mineralogy, particularly iron oxide content, but they may also reflect differences in PSD, dust ageing, retrieval assumptions, and residual contamination by non-dust aerosols despite the filtering applied.</p>
      <p id="d2e10344">To further assess the role of particle size, we compared the Fidas-derived size distributions measured during the FRAGMENT-Morocco campaign with the dust-filtered AERONET volume size distribution at OUARZ over the 2000–2020 period. The Fidas distributions, shown in Figs. 6 and 7 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.119"/>, represent near-surface in-situ measurements close to the dust source, whereas the AERONET distribution is column-integrated and retrieval-dependent (Fig. S10b). The comparison shows that the AERONET volume size distribution has a relatively larger contribution from smaller particles and a coarse-mode maximum around 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the Fidas-derived mass distribution during the campaign peaks closer to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This difference is important because particle size affects both the optical response and the retrieved refractive index.</p>
      <p id="d2e10370">The different size distributions suggest that part of the discrepancy between our in-situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals and AERONET-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> may arise from PSD differences, not only from particle shape. In our PM<sub>2.5</sub> retrieval, the size range includes most of the particles in number and is directly relevant for the AE33 absorption wavelengths used to retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, AERONET retrievals are sensitive to a column-integrated size distribution with a different fine-to-coarse partitioning. A larger relative contribution of smaller particles in the AERONET retrieval could affect the inferred absorption properties and may contribute to the higher AERONET-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p>
      <p id="d2e10410">This interpretation is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.120"/>, who emphasized that dust absorption estimates are sensitive to particle size distribution, particle shape, and refractive index. They also discussed potential limitations in AERONET dust retrievals over North Africa, including uncertainties in the representation of coarse and super-coarse dust and possible biases in retrieved refractive indices. Thus, differences between AERONET and in-situ estimates should not be attributed solely to particle-shape assumptions. They may also reflect differences in PSD, column versus surface sampling, retrieval assumptions, dust ageing, and mineralogy.</p>
      <p id="d2e10416">These results emphasize the importance of region-specific in-situ studies, such as the present work, for constraining dust optical properties. Direct measurements of locally emitted dust provide information that is complementary to column-integrated remote-sensing retrievals and help refine our understanding of regional differences in dust absorption. Such measurements are essential for improving the representation of dust optical properties in remote-sensing algorithms and climate models, particularly for quantifying the contribution of mineral dust absorption to the Earth’s radiative budget.</p>

      <fig id="F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e10421">Box-plots of the imaginary part of the retrieved complex refractive index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the dust events as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/> for the assumption of the best estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and particle density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.121"/>. Here we compare the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for: spheres, Oblate-Prolate biaxial ellipsoid distributions, Dub-06 spheroids, and triaxial ellipsoids (in greyscale) and A–F irregular shapes from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.122"/>. We compared this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with 20 years of AERONET measurements over different mid-latitude dust emitting areas (from closer to further from our location, in colours). The retrievals of the average for the in-situ measurements and the average for the AERONET estimations are also shown through the black triangles. The regions of the AERONET measurements are shown in Fig. S10a, with the following acronyms: Ouarzazate (OUARZ), northwestern Africa (WNAFR), northeastern Africa (ENAFR), Sahel (SAHEL), Arabian Peninsula (ARPEN), central Asia (CASIA), and India (INDIA). The box-plots limits represent the 25th and 75th quantiles and the lines represent the 5th and 95th quantiles.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14531/2026/acp-26-14531-2026-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e10505">This study provides high-temporal-resolution, source-region in-situ measurements of mineral dust optical properties, with a focus on absorption, scattering, and their spectral dependence, and the conditional retrieval of the imaginary part of the complex refractive index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The measurements were conducted during the FRAGMENT-Morocco campaign in a Saharan dust source region, allowing the optical properties of freshly emitted dust to be characterized under natural emission conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e10515">The campaign captured three distinct aerosol regimes: local dust emissions, haboob-driven dust events, and periods influenced by anthropogenic pollution advection mixed with minor dust emissions. Dust-dominated periods exhibited high SSA values, increasing from 0.952 at 370 nm to 0.985 at 550 nm to 0.995 at 880 nm for PM<sub>2.5</sub> particles and from 0.948 at 370 nm to 0.986 at 550 nm to 0.996 at 880 nm for PM<sub>10</sub> particles. These values are broadly consistent with previous Saharan dust observations, while differences among studies reflect variations in size range, source region, mineralogy, atmospheric processing, and aerosol mixing state. Periods with anthropogenic influence showed lower SSA, particularly at near-infrared wavelengths and higher mass absorption efficiencies, suggesting the presence of fine carbonaceous aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d2e10536">The optical properties showed a strong dependence on particle size and inlet cut-off. During the PM<sub>2.5</sub> period, increasing effective radius was associated with a clearer dust optical signature: SAE decreased towards values near or below zero, SSAAE became negative, and AAE increased towards values typical of mineral dust. The mass absorption efficiency decreased with increasing particle size, while the scattering and extinction efficiencies reflected the shift of the optically active particle size range. During the PM<sub>10</sub> period, the broader coarse-particle fraction produced a consistently stronger dust signature and lower mass-normalized efficiencies, reflecting the dominant contribution of coarse dust to mass. The asymmetry parameter and backscatter fraction were also consistent with previous Saharan dust measurements, confirming the important role of coarse particles in controlling the angular distribution of scattering.</p>
      <p id="d2e10557">The observations also show that even at a remote dust-source site, regional and local anthropogenic pollution can affect the measured optical properties. Period C, influenced by anthropogenic advection, exhibited smaller effective radius, AAE and SAE values closer to 1, a less negative or positive SSAAE, lower SSA at near-infrared wavelengths, and higher mass absorption efficiency. These features point to a larger relative contribution of fine absorbing carbonaceous particles during calm periods with weak local dust emission. This result highlights the importance of separating dust-dominated periods from mixed aerosol conditions when interpreting source-region dust optical measurements.</p>
      <p id="d2e10561">We retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for PM<sub>2.5</sub> dust-event periods using a cost function based on the truncated single scattering albedo (tssa). The retrieval was performed under prescribed assumptions for particle shape, particle density, the real part of the refractive index, and the AE33 multiple-scattering correction. Therefore, the retrieved values should be interpreted as conditional estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, not as a unique unconstrained retrieval of dust shape, PSD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This formulation was chosen because the Fidas and the optical instruments sampled through different inlets and over different size ranges, making inversions based directly on extensive absorption and scattering coefficients more sensitive to possible PSD–optical sampling mismatches.</p>
      <p id="d2e10601">The retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values decreased with wavelength across the five shortest AE33 wavelengths, consistent with stronger short-wave absorption by iron-bearing minerals. Particle density and particle shape were the dominant assumptions affecting the retrieval. The prescribed real part of the refractive index had a comparatively weaker effect within the tested range of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)–1.55. The AE33 correction uncertainty also propagated into the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly at longer wavelengths where the relative contribution of the scattering artefact is larger.</p>
      <p id="d2e10630">Particle-shape assumptions had a substantial effect on the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the central assumptions, non-spherical particles generally required larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values than spheres to reproduce the observed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tssa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). At 520 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from approximately 0.00104 for spheres to approximately 0.00145 for triaxial ellipsoids, corresponding to an increase of about 40 %. The relationship between retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and particle non-sphericity, represented by the ratio of volume-equivalent to cross-section-equivalent radii, suggests that more elongated or irregular particles require higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values under otherwise equivalent assumptions. This relationship should be interpreted cautiously because single irregular shapes are used as sensitivity cases rather than as realistic descriptions of the full atmospheric dust population. Nevertheless, the result demonstrates that particle-shape representation can substantially affect retrieved absorption properties.</p>
      <p id="d2e10676">The comparison with dust-filtered AERONET retrievals provides useful context but should not be interpreted as a direct validation of the in-situ retrievals. The closest AERONET station, Ouarzazate, showed qualitative agreement with the in-situ retrievals, particularly at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 675 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, when non-spherical shape assumptions were used, including the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.123"/> spheroid distribution. However, discrepancies appear at shorter and longer wavelengths. Differences between AERONET and in-situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values can arise from several factors, including column versus surface sampling, differences in PSD, size sensitivity, retrieval assumptions, mineralogy, dust ageing, and possible residual contamination by non-dust aerosols. The comparison between Fidas and AERONET size distributions further indicates that PSD differences may contribute to discrepancies in retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in addition to particle-shape effects.</p>
      <p id="d2e10712">Overall, this work provides field-based constraints on the optical properties of freshly emitted Saharan dust and highlights the sensitivity of inferred absorption properties to particle size, density, and shape. The results support the need for improved treatment of non-spherical dust optics in remote-sensing retrievals and climate-model parametrizations. At the same time, the OSSEs and sensitivity tests show that robust field retrievals of dust refractive index require careful characterization of inlet transmission, PSD–optical closure, particle density, particle shape, and absorption-correction uncertainty. In particular, the use of a tssa-based cost function reduces sensitivity to approximately uniform particle-number mismatches between the OPC and optical instruments, but it cannot fully remove the possible impact of size-dependent PSD-shape distortions. Future field campaigns should therefore prioritize co-located and size-consistent PSD and optical measurements, harmonized and well-characterized inlet systems, independent constraints on particle density and morphology, and explicit cross-instrument closure protocols. Field and chamber studies should be viewed as complementary: chamber experiments provide controlled conditions for testing retrieval methods and quantifying instrumental biases, whereas field measurements provide environmental representativeness by sampling dust under natural emission, turbulence, transport, and mixing conditions. A closer integration of both approaches will be essential to further reduce uncertainties in dust absorption and its radiative impact.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e10720">Data and code will be made accessible through an open repository once the publication has been accepted. MOPSMAP dataset is available at <uri>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1284217</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.124"/>. Triaxial spheroids database is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4959767" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4959767</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.125"/>. Aspect ratio distribution from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.126"/> is available in the GRASP Spheroids Package repository at <uri>https://www.grasp-open.com/products/spheroid-package-release/</uri> (last access: 1 April 2026).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e10742">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-14531-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-14531-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e10751">AA, XQ, MK, KK and CPGP designed the measurement campaign. JYD, AA, CGF, AGR, MK, KK, AP, XQ, CR and CPGP participated in the field measurement campaign. CGF processed the meteorological data, CGF and JE treated the PNSD datasets, AP and AGR obtained the airborne and soil mineralogical measurements. JYD processed the optical data-sets, analyzed the results, and summarized and expressed them in this manuscript. JE provided the complex refractive index modelization analysis, analyzed the results, and summarized and expressed them in this manuscript. CPGP played a key role in shaping the manuscript’s conception and structure and revised and edited the text. All authors provided advice regarding the structure and content as well as contributed to the writing of the final manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e10757">At the time of the research, MR and MI were also employed by the manufacturer of the Aethalometer AE33. At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of  <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e10766">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e10773">We would like to acknowledge the EMIT project, supported by the NASA Earth Venture Instrument program, under the Earth Science Division of the Science Mission Directorate. We thank Paul Ginoux for providing high-resolution global dust source maps that were very helpful for identifying the experimental site. We also acknowledge Jasper Kok for providing useful insights on our methods. We are very thankful of the teams behind the production of the optical properties used in this work, namely, MOPSMAP, the triaxial spheroids database from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.127"/>, and also the GRASP Spheroids Package teams for making the aspect ratio distribution data openly available.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e10781">This publication was funded by the DUSTIMPACT (DUSTMOD) project (grant no. PID2024-157110OI-C21 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF, EU). The field campaign and its associated research, including this work, was primarily funded by the European Research Council under the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme through the ERC Consolidator Grant FRAGMENT (grant agreement no. 773051) and the AXA Research Fund through the AXA Chair on Sand and Dust Storms at BSC. BSC co-authors also acknowledge the support of the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad through the HEAVY project (grant no. PID2022-140365OB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF/EU) and the Horizon Europe programme under grant agreement no. 101137680 via project CERTAINTY. JYD was supported by the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship Programme, SMASH co-funded under the grant agreement no. 101081355. The SMASH project is co-funded by the Republic of Slovenia and the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. JE acknowledges his AI4S fellowship within the “Generación D” initiative by Red.es, Ministerio para la Transformación Digital y de la Función Pública, for talent attraction (C005/24-ED CV1), funded by NextGenerationEU through PRTR. CGF was supported by a PhD fellowship from the Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) grant no. 2020-FI-B 00678. MK received funding through the Helmholtz Association's Initiative and Networking Fund (grant agreement no. VH-NG-1533). KK was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, grant nos. 264907654 and 416816480).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e10787">This paper was edited by Stelios Kazadzis and reviewed by five anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Ackerman et al.(2000)Ackerman, Toon, Stevens, Heymsfield, Ramanathan, and Welton</label><mixed-citation>Ackerman, A. S., Toon, O. B., Stevens, D. E., Heymsfield, A. J., Ramanathan, V., and Welton, E. J.: Reduction of Tropical Cloudiness by Soot, Science, 288, 1042–1047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5468.1042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.288.5468.1042</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Adebiyi and Kok(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Adebiyi, A. A. and Kok, J. F.: Climate models miss most of the coarse dust in the atmosphere, Sci. Adv., 6, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507</ext-link>, 2020. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Adebiyi et al.(2023)Adebiyi, Huang, Samset, and Kok</label><mixed-citation>Adebiyi, A. A., Huang, Y., Samset, B. H., and Kok, J. F.: Observations suggest that North African dust absorbs less solar radiation than models estimate, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00825-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-023-00825-2</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bagheri and Bonadonna(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Bagheri, G. and Bonadonna, C.: On the drag of freely falling non-spherical particles, Powder Technol., 301, 526–544, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.06.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.powtec.2016.06.015</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Balkanski et al.(2007)Balkanski, Schulz, Claquin, and Guibert</label><mixed-citation>Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Claquin, T., and Guibert, S.: Reevaluation of Mineral aerosol radiative forcings suggests a better agreement with satellite and AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 81–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-81-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-81-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Caponi et al.(2017)Caponi, Formenti, Massabó, Di Biagio, Cazaunau, Pangui, Chevaillier, Landrot, Andreae, Kandler, Piketh, Saeed, Seibert, Williams, Balkanski, Prati, and Doussin</label><mixed-citation>Caponi, L., Formenti, P., Massabó, D., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Chevaillier, S., Landrot, G., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Piketh, S., Saeed, T., Seibert, D., Williams, E., Balkanski, Y., Prati, P., and Doussin, J.-F.: Spectral- and size-resolved mass absorption efficiency of mineral dust aerosols in the shortwave spectrum: a simulation chamber study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7175–7191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7175-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7175-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Chen and Bond(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Claquin et al.(1999)Claquin, Schulz, and Balkanski</label><mixed-citation> Claquin, T., Schulz, M., and Balkanski, Y.: Modeling the mineralogy of atmospheric dust sources, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 22243–22256, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Collaud Coen et al.(2004)Collaud Coen, Weingartner, Schaub, Hueglin, Corrigan, Henning, Schwikowski, and Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Schaub, D., Hueglin, C., Corrigan, C., Henning, S., Schwikowski, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Saharan dust events at the Jungfraujoch: detection by wavelength dependence of the single scattering albedo and first climatology analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2465–2480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2465-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2465-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Collaud Coen et al.(2010)Collaud Coen, Weingartner, Apituley, Ceburnis, Fierz-Schmidhauser, Flentje, Henzing, Jennings, Moerman, Petzold, Schmid, and Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Di Biagio et al.(2017)Di Biagio, Formenti, Cazaunau, Pangui, Marchand, and Doussin</label><mixed-citation>Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Marchand, N., and Doussin, J.-F.: Corrigendum to “Aethalometer multiple scattering correction Cref for mineral dust aerosols” published in Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2923–2939, 2017, Corrigendum to Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2923–2939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2923-2017-corrigendum" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-2923-2017-corrigendum</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Di Biagio et al.(2019)Di Biagio, Formenti, Balkanski, Caponi, Cazaunau, Pangui, Journet, Nowak, Andreae, Kandler, Saeed, Piketh, Seibert, Williams, and Doussin</label><mixed-citation>Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Balkanski, Y., Caponi, L., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Journet, E., Nowak, S., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Saeed, T., Piketh, S., Seibert, D., Williams, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Complex refractive indices and single-scattering albedo of global dust aerosols in the shortwave spectrum and relationship to size and iron content, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15503–15531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15503-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-15503-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Di Biagio et al.(2020)Di Biagio, Balkanski, Albani, Boucher, and Formenti</label><mixed-citation>Di Biagio, C., Balkanski, Y., Albani, S., Boucher, O., and Formenti, P.: Direct Radiative Effect by Mineral Dust Aerosols Constrained by New Microphysical and Spectral Optical Data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086186" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL086186</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Drinovec et al.(2015)Drinovec, Močnik, Zotter, Prévôt, Ruckstuhl, Coz, Rupakheti, Sciare, Müller, Wiedensohler, and Hansen</label><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The ”dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Dubovik et al.(2002)Dubovik, Holben, Eck, Smirnov, Kaufman, King, Tanré, and Slutsker</label><mixed-citation> Dubovik, O., Holben, B., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King, M. D., Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of absorption and optical properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 590–608, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Dubovik et al.(2006)Dubovik, Sinyuk, Lapyonok, Holben, Mishchenko, Yang, Eck, Volten, Muñoz, Veihelmann, van der Zande, Leon, Sorokin, and Slutsker</label><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O., Sinyuk, A., Lapyonok, T., Holben, B. N., Mishchenko, M., Yang, P., Eck, T. F., Volten, H., Muñoz, O., Veihelmann, B., van der Zande, W. J., Leon, J.-F., Sorokin, M., and Slutsker, I.: Application of spheroid models to account for aerosol particle nonsphericity in remote sensing of desert dust, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006619" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006619</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Dupont et al.(2019)Dupont, Rajot, Labiadh, Bergametti, Lamaud, Irvine, Alfaro, Bouet, Fernandes, Khalfallah, Marticorena, Bonnefond, Chevaillier, Garrigou, Henry-des Tureaux, Sekrafi, and Zapf</label><mixed-citation>Dupont, S., Rajot, J.-L., Labiadh, M., Bergametti, G., Lamaud, E., Irvine, M. R., Alfaro, S. C., Bouet, C., Fernandes, R., Khalfallah, B., Marticorena, B., Bonnefond, J. M., Chevaillier, S., Garrigou, D., Henry-des Tureaux, T., Sekrafi, S., and Zapf, P.: Dissimilarity Between Dust, Heat, and Momentum Turbulent Transports During Aeolian Soil Erosion, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1064–1089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029048</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Ealo et al.(2016)Ealo, Alastuey, Ripoll, Pérez, Minguillón, Querol, and Pandolfi</label><mixed-citation>Ealo, M., Alastuey, A., Ripoll, A., Pérez, N., Minguillón, M. C., Querol, X., and Pandolfi, M.: Detection of Saharan dust and biomass burning events using near-real-time intensive aerosol optical properties in the north-western Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12567–12586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12567-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12567-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Freedman and Diaconis(1981)</label><mixed-citation>Freedman, D. and Diaconis, P.: On the histogram as a density estimator:L2 theory, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeit., 57, 453–476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01025868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF01025868</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Gasteiger and Wiegner(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>Gasteiger, J. and Wiegner, M.: MOPSMAP v1.0: a versatile tool for the modeling of aerosol optical properties, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2739–2762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2739-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-2739-2018</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Gasteiger and Wiegner(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>Gasteiger, J. and Wiegner, M.: Modeling of aerosol optical properties with MOPSMAP: Fortran program with data set,  Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1284217" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1284217</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Gasteiger et al.(2011)Gasteiger, Wiegner, Groß, Freudenthaler, Toledano, Tesche, and Kandler</label><mixed-citation> Gasteiger, J., Wiegner, M., Groß, S., Freudenthaler, V., Toledano, C., Tesche, M., and Kandler, K.: Modelling lidar-relevant optical properties of complex mineral dust aerosols, Tellus B, 63, 725–741, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Giles et al.(2019)Giles, Sinyuk, Sorokin, Schafer, Smirnov, Slutsker, Eck, Holben, Lewis, Campbell et al.</label><mixed-citation>Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R., Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 169–209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>González-Flórez et al.(2023)González-Flórez, Klose, Alastuey, Dupont, Escribano, Etyemezian, Gonzalez-Romero, Huang, Kandler, Nikolich, Panta, Querol, Reche, Yus-Díez, and Pérez García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>González-Flórez, C., Klose, M., Alastuey, A., Dupont, S., Escribano, J., Etyemezian, V., Gonzalez-Romero, A., Huang, Y., Kandler, K., Nikolich, G., Panta, A., Querol, X., Reche, C., Yus-Díez, J., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Insights into the size-resolved dust emission from field measurements in the Moroccan Sahara, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7177–7212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7177-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-7177-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>González-Romero et al.(2023)González-Romero, González-Flórez, Panta, Yus-Díez, Reche, Córdoba, Moreno, Alastuey, Kandler, Klose, Baldo, Clark, Shi, Querol, and Pérez García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>González-Romero, A., González-Flórez, C., Panta, A., Yus-Díez, J., Reche, C., Córdoba, P., Moreno, N., Alastuey, A., Kandler, K., Klose, M., Baldo, C., Clark, R. N., Shi, Z., Querol, X., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Variability in sediment particle size, mineralogy, and Fe mode of occurrence across dust-source inland drainage basins: the case of the lower Drâa Valley, Morocco, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15815–15834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15815-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-15815-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>González-Romero et al.(2024a)González-Romero, González-Flórez, Panta, Yus-Díez, Córdoba, Alastuey, Moreno, Hernández-Chiriboga, Kandler, Klose, Clark, Ehlmann, Greenberger, Keebler, Brodrick, Green, Ginoux, Querol, and Pérez García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>González-Romero, A., González-Flórez, C., Panta, A., Yus-Díez, J., Córdoba, P., Alastuey, A., Moreno, N., Hernández-Chiriboga, M., Kandler, K., Klose, M., Clark, R. N., Ehlmann, B. L., Greenberger, R. N., Keebler, A. M., Brodrick, P., Green, R., Ginoux, P., Querol, X., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Characterization of the particle size distribution, mineralogy, and Fe mode of occurrence of dust-emitting sediments from the Mojave Desert, California, USA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9155–9176, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9155-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-9155-2024</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>González-Romero et al.(2024b)González-Romero, González-Flórez, Panta, Yus-Díez, Córdoba, Alastuey, Moreno, Kandler, Klose, Clark, Ehlmann, Greenberger, Keebler, Brodrick, Green, Querol, and Pérez García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>González-Romero, A., González-Flórez, C., Panta, A., Yus-Díez, J., Córdoba, P., Alastuey, A., Moreno, N., Kandler, K., Klose, M., Clark, R. N., Ehlmann, B. L., Greenberger, R. N., Keebler, A. M., Brodrick, P., Green, R. O., Querol, X., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Probing Iceland's dust-emitting sediments: particle size distribution, mineralogy, cohesion, Fe mode of occurrence, and reflectance spectra signatures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6883–6910, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6883-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-6883-2024</ext-link>, 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Hansen and Travis(1974)</label><mixed-citation> Hansen, J. E. and Travis, L. D.: Light scattering in planetary atmospheres, Space science reviews, 16, 527–610, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Horvath et al.(2018)Horvath, Alados Arboledas, and José Olmo Reyes</label><mixed-citation>Horvath, H., Alados Arboledas, L., and Olmo Reyes, F. J.: Angular scattering of the Sahara dust aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17735–17744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17735-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17735-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Huang et al.(2021)Huang, Adebiyi, Formenti, and Kok</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Adebiyi, A. A., Formenti, P., and Kok, J. F.: Linking the Different Diameter Types of Aspherical Desert Dust Indicates That Models Underestimate Coarse Dust Emission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL092054</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Johnson and Osborne(2011)</label><mixed-citation> Johnson, B. and Osborne, S.: Physical and optical properties of mineral dust aerosol measured by aircraft during the GERBILS campaign, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1117–1130, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Kandler et al.(2009)Kandler, Schütz, Deutscher, Ebert, Hofmann, Jäckel, Jaenicke, Knippertz, Lieke, Massling, Petzold, Schladitz, Weinzierl, Wiedensohler, Zorn, and Weinbruch</label><mixed-citation>Kandler, K., Schütz, L., Deutscher, C., Ebert, M., Hofmann, H., Jäckel, S., Jaenicke, R., Knippertz, P., Lieke, K., Massling, A., Petzold, A., Schladitz, A., Weinzierl, B., Wiedensohler, A., Zorn, S., and Weinbruch, S.: Size distribution, mass concentration, chemical and mineralogical composition and derived optical parameters of the boundary layer aerosol at Tinfou, Morocco, during SAMUM 2006, Tellus  B, 61, 32–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00385.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00385.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Karydis et al.(2017)Karydis, Tsimpidi, Bacer, Pozzer, Nenes, and Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Bacer, S., Pozzer, A., Nenes, A., and Lelieveld, J.: Global impact of mineral dust on cloud droplet number concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5601–5621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5601-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-5601-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Keywood et al.(1999)Keywood, Ayers, Gras, Gillett, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>Keywood, M. D., Ayers, G. P., Gras, J. L., Gillett, R. W., and Cohen, D.: An Evaluation of PM10 and PM2.5 Size Selective Inlet Performance Using Ambient Aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 401–407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868299304589" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868299304589</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kirchstetter et al.(2004)Kirchstetter, Novakov, and Hobbs</label><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic carbon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004999</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Kok et al.(2017)Kok, Ridley, Zhou, Miller, Zhao, Heald, Ward, Albani, and Haustein</label><mixed-citation>Kok, J. F., Ridley, D. A., Zhou, Q., Miller, R. L., Zhao, C., Heald, C. L., Ward, D. S., Albani, S., and Haustein, K.: Smaller desert dust cooling effect estimated from analysis of dust size and abundance, Nat. Geosci., 10, 274–278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2912" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2912</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Kok et al.(2023)Kok, Storelvmo, Karydis, Adebiyi, Mahowald, Evan, He, and Leung</label><mixed-citation> Kok, J. F., Storelvmo, T., Karydis, V. A., Adebiyi, A. A., Mahowald, N. M., Evan, A. T., He, C., and Leung, D. M.: Mineral dust aerosol impacts on global climate and climate change, Nature Rev. Earth  Environ., 4, 71–86, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Kong et al.(2024)Kong, Wang, and Bi</label><mixed-citation>Kong, S., Wang, Z., and Bi, L.: Uncertainties in laboratory-measured shortwave refractive indices of mineral dust aerosols and derived optical properties: a theoretical assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6911–6935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6911-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-6911-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lafon et al.(2006)Lafon, Sokolik, Rajot, Caquincau, and Gaudichet</label><mixed-citation>Lafon, S., Sokolik, I. N., Rajot, J. L., Caquincau, S., and Gaudichet, A.: Characterization of iron oxides in mineral dust aerosols: Implications for light absorption, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD007016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD007016</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Li et al.(2021)Li, Mahowald, Miller, García-pando, Klose, Hamilton, Ageitos, Ginoux, Balkanski, Green, Kalashnikova, Kok, Obiso, Paynter, and Thompson</label><mixed-citation>Li, L., Mahowald, N. M., Miller, R. L., Pérez García-Pando, C., Klose, M., Hamilton, D. S., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Ginoux, P., Balkanski, Y., Green, R. O., Kalashnikova, O., Kok, J. F., Obiso, V., Paynter, D., and Thompson, D. R.: Quantifying the range of the dust direct radiative effect due to source mineralogy uncertainty, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3973–4005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3973-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3973-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Lin et al.(2018)Lin, Bi, and Dubovik</label><mixed-citation>Lin, W., Bi, L., and Dubovik, O.: Assessing Superspheroids in Modeling the Scattering Matrices of Dust Aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 13917–13943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029464" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029464</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Liou(2002)</label><mixed-citation> Liou, K.-N.: An introduction to atmospheric radiation, vol. 84, Elsevier, ISBN 9780124514515, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Mahowald(2011)</label><mixed-citation> Mahowald, N.: Aerosol indirect effect on biogeochemical cycles and climate, Science, 334, 794–796, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>McGraw et al.(2020)McGraw, Storelvmo, David, and Sagoo</label><mixed-citation>McGraw, Z., Storelvmo, T., David, R. O., and Sagoo, N.: Global Radiative Impacts of Mineral Dust Perturbations Through Stratiform Clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031807</ext-link>,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Meng et al.(2010a)Meng, Yang, Kattawar, Bi, Liou, and Laszlo</label><mixed-citation>Meng, Z., Yang, P., Kattawar, G. W., Bi, L., Liou, K., and Laszlo, I.: ingle-scattering properties of tri-axial ellipsoidal mineral dust aerosols: A database for application to radiative transfer calculations, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 501–512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.008</ext-link>, 2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Meng et al.(2010b)Meng, Yang, Kattawar, Bi, Liou, and Laszlo</label><mixed-citation>Meng, Z., Yang, P., Kattawar, G. W., Bi, L., Liou, K.-N., and Laszlo, I.: Database of the paper “Single-scattering properties of tri-axial ellipsoidal mineral dust aerosols: A database for application to radiative transfer calculations”, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4959767" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4959767</ext-link>, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Mishchenko et al.(2002)Mishchenko, Travis, and Lacis</label><mixed-citation> Mishchenko, M. I., Travis, L. D., and Lacis, A. A.: Scattering, absorption, and emission of light by small particles, Cambridge university press, ISBN 0 521 78252 X, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Müller et al.(2009)Müller, Schladitz, Massling, Kaaden, Kandler, and Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Schladitz, A., Massling, A., Kaaden, N., Kandler, K., and Wiedensohler, A.: Spectral absorption coefficients and imaginary parts of refractive indices of Saharan dust during SAMUM-1, Tellus B, 61, 79–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00399.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00399.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Müller et al.(2011)Müller, Laborde, Kassell, and Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>Müller, T., Laborde, M., Kassell, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: Design and performance of a three-wavelength LED-based total scatter and backscatter integrating nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1291–1303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Myhre et al.(2013)Myhre, Shindell, Breéon, Collins, Fuglestvedt, Huang, Koch, Lamarque, Lee, Mendoza, Nakajima, Robock, Stephens, Takemura, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Breéon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing, book section 8, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 659–740,    ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Nousiainen(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Nousiainen, T.: Optical modeling of mineral dust particles: A review, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110, 1261–1279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.03.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.03.002</ext-link>,    2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Obiso et al.(2024)Obiso, Gonçalves Ageitos, Pérez García-Pando, Schuster, Bauer, Di Biagio, Formenti, Perlwitz, Tsigaridis, and Miller</label><mixed-citation>Obiso, V., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Pérez García-Pando, C., Schuster, G. L., Bauer, S. E., Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Perlwitz, J. P., Tsigaridis, K., and Miller, R. L.: Observationally constrained regional variations of shortwave absorption by iron oxides emphasize the cooling effect of dust, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1166" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2023-1166</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Obiso et al.(2024)Obiso, Gonçalves Ageitos, Pérez García-Pando, Perlwitz, Schuster, Bauer, Di Biagio, Formenti, Tsigaridis, and Miller</label><mixed-citation>Obiso, V., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Pérez García-Pando, C., Perlwitz, J. P., Schuster, G. L., Bauer, S. E., Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Tsigaridis, K., and Miller, R. L.: Observationally constrained regional variations of shortwave absorption by iron oxides emphasize the cooling effect of dust, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24, 5337–5367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5337-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-5337-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Panta et al.(2023)Panta, Kandler, Alastuey, González-Flórez, González-Romero, Klose, Querol, Reche, Yus-Díez, and Pérez García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>Panta, A., Kandler, K., Alastuey, A., González-Flórez, C., González-Romero, A., Klose, M., Querol, X., Reche, C., Yus-Díez, J., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Insights into the single-particle composition, size, mixing state, and aspect ratio of freshly emitted mineral dust from field measurements in the Moroccan Sahara using electron microscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3861–3885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3861-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-3861-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Perlwitz and Miller(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Perlwitz, J. and Miller, R. L.: Cloud cover increase with increasing aerosol absorptivity: A counterexample to the conventional semidirect aerosol effect, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012637" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012637</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Petzold et al.(2013)Petzold, Ogren, Fiebig, Laj, Li, Baltensperger, Holzer-Popp, Kinne, Pappalardo, Sugimoto, Wehrli, Wiedensohler, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting “black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Ryder et al.(2018)Ryder, Marenco, Brooke, Estelles, Cotton, Formenti, McQuaid, Price, Liu, Ausset, Rosenberg, Taylor, Choularton, Bower, Coe, Gallagher, Crosier, Lloyd, Highwood, and Murray</label><mixed-citation>Ryder, C. L., Marenco, F., Brooke, J. K., Estelles, V., Cotton, R., Formenti, P., McQuaid, J. B., Price, H. C., Liu, D., Ausset, P., Rosenberg, P. D., Taylor, J. W., Choularton, T., Bower, K., Coe, H., Gallagher, M., Crosier, J., Lloyd, G., Highwood, E. J., and Murray, B. J.: Coarse-mode mineral dust size distributions, composition and optical properties from AER-D aircraft measurements over the tropical eastern Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17225–17257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17225-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17225-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Saito et al.(2021)Saito, Yang, Ding, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>Saito, M., Yang, P., Ding, J., and Liu, X.: A Comprehensive Database of the Optical Properties of Irregular Aerosol Particles for Radiative Transfer Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 2089–2111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0338.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-20-0338.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Samset et al.(2018)Samset, Sand, Smith, Bauer, Forster, Fuglestvedt, Osprey, and Schleussner</label><mixed-citation>Samset, B. H., Sand, M., Smith, C. J., Bauer, S. E., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Osprey, S., and Schleussner, C. F.: Climate Impacts From a Removal of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1020–1029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076079</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Schladitz et al.(2009)Schladitz, Müller, Kaaden, Massling, Kandler, Ebert, Weinbruch, Deutscher, and Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>Schladitz, A., Müller, T., Kaaden, N., Massling, A., Kandler, K., Ebert, M., Weinbruch, S., Deutscher, C., and Wiedensohler, A.: In situ measurements of optical properties at Tinfou (Morocco) during the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment SAMUM 2006, Tellus  B, 61, 64–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00397.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00397.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Schuster et al.(2006)Schuster, Dubovik, and Holben</label><mixed-citation>Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Angstrom exponent and bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006328</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Schuster et al.(2016)Schuster, Dubovik, and Arola</label><mixed-citation>Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Arola, A.: Remote sensing of soot carbon – Part 1: Distinguishing different absorbing aerosol species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1565–1585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1565-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1565-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)</label><mixed-citation> Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons New York, ISBN-10 0471178152, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Sinyuk et al.(2020)Sinyuk, Holben, Eck, Giles, Slutsker, Korkin, Schafer, Smirnov, Sorokin, and Lyapustin</label><mixed-citation>Sinyuk, A., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Giles, D. M., Slutsker, I., Korkin, S., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Sorokin, M., and Lyapustin, A.: The AERONET Version 3 aerosol retrieval algorithm, associated uncertainties and comparisons to Version 2, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3375–3411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3375-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-3375-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Skiles et al.(2018)Skiles, Flanner, Cook, Dumont, and Painter</label><mixed-citation> Skiles, S. M., Flanner, M., Cook, J. M., Dumont, M., and Painter, T. H.: Radiative forcing by light-absorbing particles in snow, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 964–971, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Sokolik and Toon(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Sokolik, I. N. and Toon, O. B.: Incorporation of mineralogical composition into models of the radiative properties of mineral aerosol from UV to IR wavelengths, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 9423–9444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998JD200048</ext-link>, 1999. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Teri et al.(2022)Teri, Müller, Gasteiger, Valentini, Horvath, Vecchi, Bauer, Walser, and Weinzierl</label><mixed-citation>Teri, M., Müller, T., Gasteiger, J., Valentini, S., Horvath, H., Vecchi, R., Bauer, P., Walser, A., and Weinzierl, B.: Impact of particle size, refractive index, and shape on the determination of the particle scattering coefficient – an optical closure study evaluating different nephelometer angular truncation and illumination corrections, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3161–3187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3161-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-3161-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Yus-Díez et al.(2021)Yus-Díez, Bernardoni, Močnik, Alastuey, Ciniglia, Ivančič, Querol, Perez, Reche, Rigler, Vecchi, Valentini, and Pandolfi</label><mixed-citation>Yus-Díez, J., Bernardoni, V., Močnik, G., Alastuey, A., Ciniglia, D., Ivančič, M., Querol, X., Perez, N., Reche, C., Rigler, M., Vecchi, R., Valentini, S., and Pandolfi, M.: Determination of the multiple-scattering correction factor and its cross-sensitivity to scattering and wavelength dependence for different AE33 Aethalometer filter tapes: a multi-instrumental approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6335–6355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Yus-Díez et al.(2025)Yus-Díez, Drinovec, Alados-Arboledas, Titos, Bazo, Casans, Patrón, Querol, Gonzalez-Romero, Perez García-Pando et al.</label><mixed-citation>Yus-Díez, J., Drinovec, L., Alados-Arboledas, L., Titos, G., Bazo, E., Casans, A., Patrón, D., Querol, X., Gonzalez-Romero, A., Perez García-Pando, C., and Močnik, G.: Characterization of filter photometer artifacts in soot and dust measurements – laboratory and ambient experiments using a traceably calibrated aerosol absorption reference, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3073–3093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Optical properties and shape-dependent retrievals  of the imaginary part of the refractive  index of freshly emitted Saharan dust</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Ackerman et al.(2000)Ackerman, Toon, Stevens, Heymsfield, Ramanathan,
and Welton</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ackerman, A. S., Toon, O. B., Stevens, D. E., Heymsfield, A. J., Ramanathan,
V., and Welton, E. J.: Reduction of Tropical Cloudiness by Soot, Science,
288, 1042–1047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5468.1042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5468.1042</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Adebiyi and Kok(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adebiyi, A. A. and Kok, J. F.: Climate models miss most of the coarse dust in
the atmosphere, Sci. Adv., 6, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507</a>,
2020.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Adebiyi et al.(2023)Adebiyi, Huang, Samset, and Kok</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adebiyi, A. A., Huang, Y., Samset, B. H., and Kok, J. F.: Observations suggest
that North African dust absorbs less solar radiation than models estimate,
Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00825-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00825-2</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bagheri and Bonadonna(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bagheri, G. and Bonadonna, C.: On the drag of freely falling non-spherical
particles, Powder Technol., 301, 526–544,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.06.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.06.015</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Balkanski et al.(2007)Balkanski, Schulz, Claquin, and
Guibert</label><mixed-citation>
      
Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Claquin, T., and Guibert, S.: Reevaluation of Mineral aerosol radiative forcings suggests a better agreement with satellite and AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 81–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-81-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-81-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Caponi et al.(2017)Caponi, Formenti, Massabó, Di Biagio, Cazaunau,
Pangui, Chevaillier, Landrot, Andreae, Kandler, Piketh, Saeed, Seibert,
Williams, Balkanski, Prati, and Doussin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Caponi, L., Formenti, P., Massabó, D., Di Biagio, C., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Chevaillier, S., Landrot, G., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Piketh, S., Saeed, T., Seibert, D., Williams, E., Balkanski, Y., Prati, P., and Doussin, J.-F.: Spectral- and size-resolved mass absorption efficiency of mineral dust aerosols in the shortwave spectrum: a simulation chamber study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7175–7191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7175-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7175-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Chen and Bond(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Claquin et al.(1999)Claquin, Schulz, and
Balkanski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Claquin, T., Schulz, M., and Balkanski, Y.: Modeling the mineralogy of
atmospheric dust sources, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104,
22243–22256, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Collaud Coen et al.(2004)Collaud Coen, Weingartner, Schaub, Hueglin,
Corrigan, Henning, Schwikowski, and Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Schaub, D., Hueglin, C., Corrigan, C., Henning, S., Schwikowski, M., and Baltensperger, U.: Saharan dust events at the Jungfraujoch: detection by wavelength dependence of the single scattering albedo and first climatology analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2465–2480, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2465-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2465-2004</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Collaud Coen et al.(2010)Collaud Coen, Weingartner, Apituley,
Ceburnis, Fierz-Schmidhauser, Flentje, Henzing, Jennings, Moerman, Petzold,
Schmid, and Baltensperger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Di Biagio et al.(2017)Di Biagio, Formenti, Cazaunau, Pangui,
Marchand, and Doussin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Marchand, N., and
Doussin, J.-F.: Corrigendum to
“Aethalometer multiple scattering correction Cref for mineral dust
aerosols” published in Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2923–2939, 2017, Corrigendum to Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2923–2939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2923-2017-corrigendum" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2923-2017-corrigendum</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Di Biagio et al.(2019)Di Biagio, Formenti, Balkanski, Caponi,
Cazaunau, Pangui, Journet, Nowak, Andreae, Kandler, Saeed, Piketh, Seibert,
Williams, and Doussin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Balkanski, Y., Caponi, L., Cazaunau, M., Pangui, E., Journet, E., Nowak, S., Andreae, M. O., Kandler, K., Saeed, T., Piketh, S., Seibert, D., Williams, E., and Doussin, J.-F.: Complex refractive indices and single-scattering albedo of global dust aerosols in the shortwave spectrum and relationship to size and iron content, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15503–15531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15503-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15503-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Di Biagio et al.(2020)Di Biagio, Balkanski, Albani, Boucher, and
Formenti</label><mixed-citation>
      
Di Biagio, C., Balkanski, Y., Albani, S., Boucher, O., and Formenti, P.:
Direct Radiative Effect by Mineral Dust Aerosols Constrained by New
Microphysical and Spectral Optical Data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086186" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086186</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Drinovec et al.(2015)Drinovec, Močnik, Zotter, Prévôt,
Ruckstuhl, Coz, Rupakheti, Sciare, Müller, Wiedensohler, and
Hansen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The ”dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Dubovik et al.(2002)Dubovik, Holben, Eck, Smirnov, Kaufman, King,
Tanré, and Slutsker</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dubovik, O., Holben, B., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King, M. D.,
Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of absorption and optical
properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations, J.
Atmos. Sci., 59, 590–608, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Dubovik et al.(2006)Dubovik, Sinyuk, Lapyonok, Holben, Mishchenko,
Yang, Eck, Volten, Muñoz, Veihelmann, van der Zande, Leon, Sorokin, and
Slutsker</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dubovik, O., Sinyuk, A., Lapyonok, T., Holben, B. N., Mishchenko, M., Yang, P.,
Eck, T. F., Volten, H., Muñoz, O., Veihelmann, B., van der Zande, W. J.,
Leon, J.-F., Sorokin, M., and Slutsker, I.: Application of spheroid models to
account for aerosol particle nonsphericity in remote sensing of desert dust,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006619" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006619</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Dupont et al.(2019)Dupont, Rajot, Labiadh, Bergametti, Lamaud,
Irvine, Alfaro, Bouet, Fernandes, Khalfallah, Marticorena, Bonnefond,
Chevaillier, Garrigou, Henry-des Tureaux, Sekrafi, and Zapf</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dupont, S., Rajot, J.-L., Labiadh, M., Bergametti, G., Lamaud, E., Irvine,
M. R., Alfaro, S. C., Bouet, C., Fernandes, R., Khalfallah, B., Marticorena,
B., Bonnefond, J. M., Chevaillier, S., Garrigou, D., Henry-des Tureaux, T.,
Sekrafi, S., and Zapf, P.: Dissimilarity Between Dust, Heat, and Momentum
Turbulent Transports During Aeolian Soil Erosion, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 1064–1089,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029048</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Ealo et al.(2016)Ealo, Alastuey, Ripoll, Pérez, Minguillón,
Querol, and Pandolfi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ealo, M., Alastuey, A., Ripoll, A., Pérez, N., Minguillón, M. C., Querol, X., and Pandolfi, M.: Detection of Saharan dust and biomass burning events using near-real-time intensive aerosol optical properties in the north-western Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12567–12586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12567-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12567-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Freedman and Diaconis(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Freedman, D. and Diaconis, P.: On the histogram as a density estimator:L2
theory, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeit., 57, 453–476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01025868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01025868</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Gasteiger and Wiegner(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasteiger, J. and Wiegner, M.: MOPSMAP v1.0: a versatile tool for the modeling of aerosol optical properties, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2739–2762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2739-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2739-2018</a>, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Gasteiger and Wiegner(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasteiger, J. and Wiegner, M.: Modeling of aerosol optical properties with
MOPSMAP: Fortran program with data set,  Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1284217" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1284217</a>,
2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Gasteiger et al.(2011)Gasteiger, Wiegner, Groß, Freudenthaler,
Toledano, Tesche, and Kandler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasteiger, J., Wiegner, M., Groß, S., Freudenthaler, V., Toledano, C.,
Tesche, M., and Kandler, K.: Modelling lidar-relevant optical properties of
complex mineral dust aerosols, Tellus B,
63, 725–741, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Giles et al.(2019)Giles, Sinyuk, Sorokin, Schafer, Smirnov, Slutsker,
Eck, Holben, Lewis, Campbell et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R., Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 169–209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>González-Flórez et al.(2023)González-Flórez, Klose, Alastuey,
Dupont, Escribano, Etyemezian, Gonzalez-Romero, Huang, Kandler, Nikolich,
Panta, Querol, Reche, Yus-Díez, and Pérez
García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
González-Flórez, C., Klose, M., Alastuey, A., Dupont, S., Escribano, J., Etyemezian, V., Gonzalez-Romero, A., Huang, Y., Kandler, K., Nikolich, G., Panta, A., Querol, X., Reche, C., Yus-Díez, J., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Insights into the size-resolved dust emission from field measurements in the Moroccan Sahara, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7177–7212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7177-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7177-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>González-Romero et al.(2023)González-Romero, González-Flórez,
Panta, Yus-Díez, Reche, Córdoba, Moreno, Alastuey, Kandler, Klose,
Baldo, Clark, Shi, Querol, and Pérez
García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
González-Romero, A., González-Flórez, C., Panta, A., Yus-Díez, J., Reche, C., Córdoba, P., Moreno, N., Alastuey, A., Kandler, K., Klose, M., Baldo, C., Clark, R. N., Shi, Z., Querol, X., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Variability in sediment particle size, mineralogy, and Fe mode of occurrence across dust-source inland drainage basins: the case of the lower Drâa Valley, Morocco, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15815–15834, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15815-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15815-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>González-Romero et al.(2024a)González-Romero,
González-Flórez, Panta, Yus-Díez, Córdoba, Alastuey, Moreno,
Hernández-Chiriboga, Kandler, Klose, Clark, Ehlmann, Greenberger, Keebler,
Brodrick, Green, Ginoux, Querol, and Pérez
García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
González-Romero, A., González-Flórez, C., Panta, A., Yus-Díez, J., Córdoba, P., Alastuey, A., Moreno, N., Hernández-Chiriboga, M., Kandler, K., Klose, M., Clark, R. N., Ehlmann, B. L., Greenberger, R. N., Keebler, A. M., Brodrick, P., Green, R., Ginoux, P., Querol, X., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Characterization of the particle size distribution, mineralogy, and Fe mode of occurrence of dust-emitting sediments from the Mojave Desert, California, USA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9155–9176, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9155-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9155-2024</a>, 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>González-Romero et al.(2024b)González-Romero,
González-Flórez, Panta, Yus-Díez, Córdoba, Alastuey, Moreno,
Kandler, Klose, Clark, Ehlmann, Greenberger, Keebler, Brodrick, Green,
Querol, and Pérez García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
González-Romero, A., González-Flórez, C., Panta, A., Yus-Díez, J., Córdoba, P., Alastuey, A., Moreno, N., Kandler, K., Klose, M., Clark, R. N., Ehlmann, B. L., Greenberger, R. N., Keebler, A. M., Brodrick, P., Green, R. O., Querol, X., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Probing Iceland's dust-emitting sediments: particle size distribution, mineralogy, cohesion, Fe mode of occurrence, and reflectance spectra signatures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6883–6910, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6883-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6883-2024</a>, 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Hansen and Travis(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hansen, J. E. and Travis, L. D.: Light scattering in planetary atmospheres,
Space science reviews, 16, 527–610, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Horvath et al.(2018)Horvath, Alados Arboledas, and José Olmo
Reyes</label><mixed-citation>
      
Horvath, H., Alados Arboledas, L., and Olmo Reyes, F. J.: Angular scattering of the Sahara dust aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17735–17744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17735-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17735-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Huang et al.(2021)Huang, Adebiyi, Formenti, and Kok</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, Y., Adebiyi, A. A., Formenti, P., and Kok, J. F.: Linking the Different
Diameter Types of Aspherical Desert Dust Indicates That Models Underestimate
Coarse Dust Emission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092054,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092054</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Johnson and Osborne(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Johnson, B. and Osborne, S.: Physical and optical properties of mineral dust
aerosol measured by aircraft during the GERBILS campaign, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1117–1130, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kandler et al.(2009)Kandler, Schütz, Deutscher, Ebert, Hofmann,
Jäckel, Jaenicke, Knippertz, Lieke, Massling, Petzold, Schladitz,
Weinzierl, Wiedensohler, Zorn, and Weinbruch</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kandler, K., Schütz, L., Deutscher, C., Ebert, M., Hofmann, H.,
Jäckel, S., Jaenicke, R., Knippertz, P., Lieke, K., Massling, A.,
Petzold, A., Schladitz, A., Weinzierl, B., Wiedensohler, A., Zorn, S., and
Weinbruch, S.: Size distribution, mass concentration, chemical and
mineralogical composition and derived optical parameters of the boundary
layer aerosol at Tinfou, Morocco, during SAMUM 2006, Tellus  B, 61, 32–50,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00385.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00385.x</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Karydis et al.(2017)Karydis, Tsimpidi, Bacer, Pozzer, Nenes, and
Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Bacer, S., Pozzer, A., Nenes, A., and Lelieveld, J.: Global impact of mineral dust on cloud droplet number concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5601–5621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5601-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5601-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Keywood et al.(1999)Keywood, Ayers, Gras, Gillett, and
Cohen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keywood, M. D., Ayers, G. P., Gras, J. L., Gillett, R. W., and Cohen, D.: An
Evaluation of PM10 and PM2.5 Size Selective Inlet Performance Using Ambient
Aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 401–407,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868299304589" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868299304589</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kirchstetter et al.(2004)Kirchstetter, Novakov, and
Hobbs</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kirchstetter, T. W., Novakov, T., and Hobbs, P. V.: Evidence that the spectral
dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic carbon,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004999</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Kok et al.(2017)Kok, Ridley, Zhou, Miller, Zhao, Heald, Ward, Albani,
and Haustein</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kok, J. F., Ridley, D. A., Zhou, Q., Miller, R. L., Zhao, C., Heald, C. L.,
Ward, D. S., Albani, S., and Haustein, K.: Smaller desert dust cooling
effect estimated from analysis of dust size and abundance, Nat.
Geosci., 10, 274–278, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2912" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2912</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Kok et al.(2023)Kok, Storelvmo, Karydis, Adebiyi, Mahowald, Evan, He,
and Leung</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kok, J. F., Storelvmo, T., Karydis, V. A., Adebiyi, A. A., Mahowald, N. M.,
Evan, A. T., He, C., and Leung, D. M.: Mineral dust aerosol impacts on global
climate and climate change, Nature Rev. Earth  Environ., 4, 71–86,
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Kong et al.(2024)Kong, Wang, and Bi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kong, S., Wang, Z., and Bi, L.: Uncertainties in laboratory-measured shortwave refractive indices of mineral dust aerosols and derived optical properties: a theoretical assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6911–6935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6911-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6911-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lafon et al.(2006)Lafon, Sokolik, Rajot, Caquincau, and
Gaudichet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lafon, S., Sokolik, I. N., Rajot, J. L., Caquincau, S., and Gaudichet, A.:
Characterization of iron oxides in mineral dust aerosols: Implications for
light absorption, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 1–19,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD007016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD007016</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Li et al.(2021)Li, Mahowald, Miller, García-pando, Klose,
Hamilton, Ageitos, Ginoux, Balkanski, Green, Kalashnikova, Kok, Obiso,
Paynter, and Thompson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, L., Mahowald, N. M., Miller, R. L., Pérez García-Pando, C., Klose, M., Hamilton, D. S., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Ginoux, P., Balkanski, Y., Green, R. O., Kalashnikova, O., Kok, J. F., Obiso, V., Paynter, D., and Thompson, D. R.: Quantifying the range of the dust direct radiative effect due to source mineralogy uncertainty, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3973–4005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3973-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3973-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Lin et al.(2018)Lin, Bi, and Dubovik</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, W., Bi, L., and Dubovik, O.: Assessing Superspheroids in Modeling the
Scattering Matrices of Dust Aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 13917–13943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029464" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029464</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Liou(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liou, K.-N.: An introduction to atmospheric radiation, vol. 84, Elsevier, ISBN 9780124514515, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Mahowald(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mahowald, N.: Aerosol indirect effect on biogeochemical cycles and climate,
Science, 334, 794–796, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>McGraw et al.(2020)McGraw, Storelvmo, David, and Sagoo</label><mixed-citation>
      
McGraw, Z., Storelvmo, T., David, R. O., and Sagoo, N.: Global Radiative
Impacts of Mineral Dust Perturbations Through Stratiform Clouds, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031807" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031807</a>,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Meng et al.(2010a)Meng, Yang, Kattawar, Bi, Liou, and
Laszlo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meng, Z., Yang, P., Kattawar, G. W., Bi, L., Liou, K., and Laszlo, I.:
ingle-scattering properties of tri-axial ellipsoidal mineral dust aerosols:
A database for application to radiative transfer calculations, J.
Aerosol Sci., 41, 501–512,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.008</a>, 2010a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Meng et al.(2010b)Meng, Yang, Kattawar, Bi, Liou, and
Laszlo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meng, Z., Yang, P., Kattawar, G. W., Bi, L., Liou, K.-N., and Laszlo, I.:
Database of the paper “Single-scattering properties of tri-axial ellipsoidal
mineral dust aerosols: A database for application to radiative transfer
calculations”, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4959767" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4959767</a>, 2010b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Mishchenko et al.(2002)Mishchenko, Travis, and
Lacis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mishchenko, M. I., Travis, L. D., and Lacis, A. A.: Scattering, absorption, and
emission of light by small particles, Cambridge university press, ISBN 0 521 78252 X, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Müller et al.(2009)Müller, Schladitz, Massling, Kaaden,
Kandler, and Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Müller, T., Schladitz, A., Massling, A., Kaaden, N., Kandler, K., and
Wiedensohler, A.: Spectral absorption coefficients and imaginary parts of
refractive indices of Saharan dust during SAMUM-1, Tellus B, 61, 79–95,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00399.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00399.x</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Müller et al.(2011)Müller, Laborde, Kassell, and
Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Müller, T., Laborde, M., Kassell, G., and Wiedensohler, A.: Design and performance of a three-wavelength LED-based total scatter and backscatter integrating nephelometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1291–1303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1291-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Myhre et al.(2013)Myhre, Shindell, Breéon, Collins, Fuglestvedt,
Huang, Koch, Lamarque, Lee, Mendoza, Nakajima, Robock, Stephens, Takemura,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Breéon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J.,
Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T.,
Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and
Natural Radiative Forcing, book section 8, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 659–740,    ISBN
978-1-107-66182-0, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Nousiainen(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nousiainen, T.: Optical modeling of mineral dust particles: A review, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110, 1261–1279,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.03.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.03.002</a>,    2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Obiso et al.(2024)Obiso, Gonçalves Ageitos, Pérez
García-Pando, Schuster, Bauer, Di Biagio, Formenti, Perlwitz,
Tsigaridis, and Miller</label><mixed-citation>
      
Obiso, V., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Pérez García-Pando, C., Schuster, G. L., Bauer, S. E., Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P., Perlwitz, J. P., Tsigaridis, K., and Miller, R. L.: Observationally constrained regional variations of shortwave absorption by iron oxides emphasize the cooling effect of dust, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1166" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1166</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Obiso et al.(2024)Obiso, Gonçalves Ageitos, Pérez
García-Pando, Perlwitz, Schuster, Bauer, Di Biagio, Formenti,
Tsigaridis, and Miller</label><mixed-citation>
      
Obiso, V., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Pérez García-Pando, C., Perlwitz,
J. P., Schuster, G. L., Bauer, S. E., Di Biagio, C., Formenti, P.,
Tsigaridis, K., and Miller, R. L.: Observationally constrained regional
variations of shortwave absorption by iron oxides emphasize the cooling
effect of dust, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24, 5337–5367,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5337-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5337-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Panta et al.(2023)Panta, Kandler, Alastuey, González-Flórez,
González-Romero, Klose, Querol, Reche, Yus-Díez, and Pérez
García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
Panta, A., Kandler, K., Alastuey, A., González-Flórez, C., González-Romero, A., Klose, M., Querol, X., Reche, C., Yus-Díez, J., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Insights into the single-particle composition, size, mixing state, and aspect ratio of freshly emitted mineral dust from field measurements in the Moroccan Sahara using electron microscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3861–3885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3861-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3861-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Perlwitz and Miller(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Perlwitz, J. and Miller, R. L.: Cloud cover increase with increasing aerosol
absorptivity: A counterexample to the conventional semidirect aerosol effect,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012637" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012637</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Petzold et al.(2013)Petzold, Ogren, Fiebig, Laj, Li, Baltensperger,
Holzer-Popp, Kinne, Pappalardo, Sugimoto, Wehrli, Wiedensohler, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting “black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Ryder et al.(2018)Ryder, Marenco, Brooke, Estelles, Cotton, Formenti,
McQuaid, Price, Liu, Ausset, Rosenberg, Taylor, Choularton, Bower, Coe,
Gallagher, Crosier, Lloyd, Highwood, and Murray</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ryder, C. L., Marenco, F., Brooke, J. K., Estelles, V., Cotton, R., Formenti, P., McQuaid, J. B., Price, H. C., Liu, D., Ausset, P., Rosenberg, P. D., Taylor, J. W., Choularton, T., Bower, K., Coe, H., Gallagher, M., Crosier, J., Lloyd, G., Highwood, E. J., and Murray, B. J.: Coarse-mode mineral dust size distributions, composition and optical properties from AER-D aircraft measurements over the tropical eastern Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17225–17257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17225-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17225-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Saito et al.(2021)Saito, Yang, Ding, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saito, M., Yang, P., Ding, J., and Liu, X.: A Comprehensive Database of the
Optical Properties of Irregular Aerosol Particles for Radiative Transfer
Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 2089–2111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0338.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0338.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Samset et al.(2018)Samset, Sand, Smith, Bauer, Forster, Fuglestvedt,
Osprey, and Schleussner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Samset, B. H., Sand, M., Smith, C. J., Bauer, S. E., Forster, P. M.,
Fuglestvedt, J. S., Osprey, S., and Schleussner, C. F.: Climate Impacts From
a Removal of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
45, 1020–1029, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076079</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Schladitz et al.(2009)Schladitz, Müller, Kaaden, Massling,
Kandler, Ebert, Weinbruch, Deutscher, and Wiedensohler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schladitz, A., Müller, T., Kaaden, N., Massling, A., Kandler, K., Ebert,
M., Weinbruch, S., Deutscher, C., and Wiedensohler, A.: In situ measurements
of optical properties at Tinfou (Morocco) during the Saharan Mineral Dust
Experiment SAMUM 2006, Tellus  B,
61, 64–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00397.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00397.x</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Schuster et al.(2006)Schuster, Dubovik, and
Holben</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Angstrom exponent and bimodal
aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Schuster et al.(2016)Schuster, Dubovik, and Arola</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Arola, A.: Remote sensing of soot carbon – Part 1: Distinguishing different absorbing aerosol species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1565–1585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1565-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1565-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From air
pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons New York, ISBN-10 0471178152, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Sinyuk et al.(2020)Sinyuk, Holben, Eck, Giles, Slutsker, Korkin,
Schafer, Smirnov, Sorokin, and Lyapustin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sinyuk, A., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Giles, D. M., Slutsker, I., Korkin, S., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Sorokin, M., and Lyapustin, A.: The AERONET Version 3 aerosol retrieval algorithm, associated uncertainties and comparisons to Version 2, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3375–3411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3375-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3375-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Skiles et al.(2018)Skiles, Flanner, Cook, Dumont, and
Painter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Skiles, S. M., Flanner, M., Cook, J. M., Dumont, M., and Painter, T. H.:
Radiative forcing by light-absorbing particles in snow, Nat. Clim.
Change, 8, 964–971, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Sokolik and Toon(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sokolik, I. N. and Toon, O. B.: Incorporation of mineralogical composition
into models of the radiative properties of mineral aerosol from UV to IR
wavelengths, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 9423–9444,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200048</a>, 1999.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Teri et al.(2022)Teri, Müller, Gasteiger, Valentini, Horvath,
Vecchi, Bauer, Walser, and Weinzierl</label><mixed-citation>
      
Teri, M., Müller, T., Gasteiger, J., Valentini, S., Horvath, H., Vecchi, R., Bauer, P., Walser, A., and Weinzierl, B.: Impact of particle size, refractive index, and shape on the determination of the particle scattering coefficient – an optical closure study evaluating different nephelometer angular truncation and illumination corrections, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3161–3187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3161-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3161-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Yus-Díez et al.(2021)Yus-Díez, Bernardoni, Močnik,
Alastuey, Ciniglia, Ivančič, Querol, Perez, Reche, Rigler, Vecchi,
Valentini, and Pandolfi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yus-Díez, J., Bernardoni, V., Močnik, G., Alastuey, A., Ciniglia, D., Ivančič, M., Querol, X., Perez, N., Reche, C., Rigler, M., Vecchi, R., Valentini, S., and Pandolfi, M.: Determination of the multiple-scattering correction factor and its cross-sensitivity to scattering and wavelength dependence for different AE33 Aethalometer filter tapes: a multi-instrumental approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6335–6355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Yus-Díez et al.(2025)Yus-Díez, Drinovec, Alados-Arboledas,
Titos, Bazo, Casans, Patrón, Querol, Gonzalez-Romero, Perez
García-Pando et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yus-Díez, J., Drinovec, L., Alados-Arboledas, L., Titos, G., Bazo, E., Casans, A., Patrón, D., Querol, X., Gonzalez-Romero, A., Perez García-Pando, C., and Močnik, G.: Characterization of filter photometer artifacts in soot and dust measurements – laboratory and ambient experiments using a traceably calibrated aerosol absorption reference, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3073–3093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
