<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-14277-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Characterizing lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production in the Ebro Valley with meteosat 12 LI and LMA observations</article-title><alt-title>Lightning-produced NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> parameterizations based on lightning frequency</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pérez-Invernón</surname><given-names>Francisco J.</given-names></name>
          <email>fjpi89@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-3854</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gordillo-Vázquez</surname><given-names>Francisco J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>van der Velde</surname><given-names>Oscar</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1638-6628</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Montanyà</surname><given-names>Joan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>López Trujillo</surname><given-names>Jesús Alberto</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8802-4271</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Pineda</surname><given-names>Nicolau</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2507-8424</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Loyola</surname><given-names>Diego</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8547-9350</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Seo</surname><given-names>Sora</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1889-4802</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Knote</surname><given-names>Christoph</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9105-9179</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Fierro</surname><given-names>Alexandre O.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Huntrieser</surname><given-names>Heidi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8046-1859</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Solar System Department, Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA), CSIC, PO Box 3004,  18080 Granada, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Lightning Research Group, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Terrassa, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Meteorological Service of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Methodik der Fernerkundung, Wessling, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Chair of Model-Based Environmental Exposure Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Metocean Team, I&amp;E Engineering, BP Exploration and Operating Company, Ltd., Sunbury, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Francisco J. Pérez-Invernón (fjpi89@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>14277</fpage><lpage>14301</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Francisco J. Pérez-Invernón et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e236">Lightning is one of the main sources of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in the Earth's atmosphere, yet there is considerable variability in NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production during thunderstorms. In this study, we combined optical lightning data from the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Lightning Imaging (LI) instrument, which provides information on the occurrence rate and physical characteristics of lightning flashes, measurements from an extended Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) consisting of 24 sensors, lightning measurements from the Lightning Location System (LLS) of the Meteorological Service of Catalonia (MSC), and TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) cloud and NO<sub>2</sub> research products to investigate lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions in the Ebro Valley (Spain). WRF-Chem simulations were used to calculate the necessary air mass factors and to subtract the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> not produced by lightning from the TROPOMI measurements, allowing a more accurate estimation of lightning-induced NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. We found positive relationships between lightning-produced NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash and several lightning properties, including flash channel length, radiance, footprint, duration and the length of the optical continuous signal detected from space. These results highlight the importance of combining detailed lightning observations with atmospheric modeling to quantify NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions from thunderstorms.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Agencia Estatal de Investigación</funding-source>
<award-id>RYC2022-035821-I</award-id>
<award-id>PID2022-136348NB-C31</award-id>
<award-id>PID2022-136348NB-C32</award-id>
<award-id>EQC2021-006957-P</award-id>
<award-id>CEX2021-001131-S</award-id>
<award-id>PID2025-169163NB-C31</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e321">Lightning produces nitrogen oxides (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub>) by following the Zeldovich mechanism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118" id="paren.1"/>. Lightning accounts for about 10 % of total emissions of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.2"/> in the atmosphere, producing between 3 and 7 Tg N in NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.3"/>, or between 150 and 350 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash. These emissions are even more important in the tropics, accounting for up to 20 % of the total NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>. Lightning-produced NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>) is about 6 times more efficient in driving ozone production than anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions, producing about 100 molecules of ozone per molecule of lightning-emitted NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> molecule <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.5"/>. In turn, LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> affects the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere and the tropospheric budget of carbon monoxide and methane <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e456">The LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> Production Efficiency (PE), defined as the total production of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> mol or molecules per lightning flash, exhibits substantial variability across different measurements, likely reflecting both measurement uncertainties and influences of lightning flash characteristics. Precise determination of the variability of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE is essential to determine the role of lightning in the chemical composition of the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx105 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.7"/>. Airborne campaigns have significantly contributed to set the current estimations of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE, such as The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) field campaign <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.8"/> in the USA, the TROCCINOX campaign in the tropics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.9"/> and the EULINOX campaign in Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.10"/>. Combination of airborne campaign with ground-based instruments suggest that there is a proportional relationship between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the flash channel lengths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.11"/>. In turn, laboratory and modeling studies have reported a positive relationship between lightning flash energy and flash channel length with LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx113 bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.12"/>. According to estimates reported in the literature, the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production per unit discharge of energy ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production per unit flash channel length spans from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.13"/>. Estimations of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE from triggered lightning reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="text.14"/> found a production of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash channel length in three measured flashes, with values ranging between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="text.15"/>, slow discharge processes occurring on time scales ranging from milliseconds to hundreds of milliseconds, such as continuing currents and other steady currents lasting for tens to hundred milliseconds, account for approximately 80 % of the total NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production per lightning flash. However, the possible relationship between continuing current and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production has never been confirmed using systematic measurements in storms, mostly because of difficulties in monitoring the occurrence of lightning with continuing currents over large areas. Recent efforts have been made to detect the presence of continuing current in lightning from space <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.16"/>. However, space-based optical sensors have a low detection efficiency for continuing currents occurring below clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx114" id="paren.17"/>. The combination of space-based measurements with ground radio detections could serve to monitor and characterize the continuing currents over large areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.18"/>. Recent results have already shown that global Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) magnetic field signals, which are strongly influenced by the presence of continuing current in lightning, can serve as a proxy for estimating inter-annual variations in  LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="paren.19"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e752">Nadir-viewing satellites have provided significant advances in the estimations of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE  (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx77" id="altparen.20"/>). In particular, systematic retrievals of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx3" id="text.21"/> and from the Sentinel-5P TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.22"/> have reported an inverse relationship between lightning flash rates and the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.23"/> presented a revised evaluation of TROPOMI-based LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates by incorporating lightning observations from the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) and a new set of atmospheric chemistry simulations to account for the influence of background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> not produced by fresh lightning on the retrievals. This study reported a weaker relationship than that found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.24"/>, particularly for weak to moderately active thunderstorms (defined as fewer than 3000 flashes per hour and degree).</p>
      <p id="d2e816">Using a combination of GLM lightning observations and TROPOMI measurements, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.25"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.26"/> reported a weak positive relationship between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and lightning flash optical energy. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.27"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.28"/> estimated LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE per flash by combining Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) observations with satellite-based and aircraft-based NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> measurements, respectively. These studies found that thunderstorms with higher lightning flash rates tend to produce shorter lightning channel lengths and lower LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE per flash, consistent with earlier findings. This behavior can be reconciled by the inverse relationship between lightning channel length and flash occurrence frequency within storms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.29"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e872">More recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="text.30"/> assessed the uncertainty of satellite-based LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates by comparison with aircraft measurements, reporting differences between satellite-retrieved and aircraft-retrieved lightning-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> columns ranging from approximately 20 % to 50 %.</p>
      <p id="d2e896">The Ebro Valley, located in the North of Spain, is an area of high lightning activity. Airflows over the Ebro Valley are shaped by the Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic Ocean, the Pyrenean mountain range, cold fronts traversing Europe, and a thermal low over the Iberian Peninsula <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.31"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.32"/> provided the first TROPOMI-based LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimations over the Ebro Valley using different lightning location systems and TROPOMI products. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.33"/> combined lightning measurements from the Ebro LMA (eLMA) with TROPOMI cloud and NO<sub>2</sub> products, as well as Earth Networks Lightning Total Network (ENTLN) lightning measurements, to report a positive relationship between lightning flash channel lengths and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.34"/> estimated the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> not produced by lightning by using TROPOMI-derived tropospheric NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> over TROPOMI pixels without lightning in the previous 5 h. In this study, to reduce uncertainties in estimates of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE, we investigate relationships between lightning flashes and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE in the Ebro Valley to contribute to reduce current uncertainties in the measured variability of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE. We use optical measurements of lightning provided by the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Lightning Imager (LI) onboard Meteosat-12 satellite  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.35"/> and Very High Frequency (VHF) Lightning Mapping Arrays (LMAs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.36"/> measurements of lightning from the recently upgraded   extended Catalonia LMA system (XCALMA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.37"/> together with the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) TROPOMI operational cloud and TROPOMI research NO<sub>2</sub> products, also known as TROP-DLR <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.38"/>. Meteosat 12 LI lightning space-based measurements include geometric and temporal metrics of lightning that are influenced by cloud cover, such as the area illuminated by the discharge, named flash footprint, the detected total radiance of the flash, the optical duration and the temporal evolution of the optical signal detected from space. In turn, XCALMA provides estimations of the total flash channel length, volume and duration of flashes from Very High Frequency (VHF) sources without the effect of cloud distortion. Additionally, we employ the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.39"/>, version 4.3., to estimate the case-based background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> not produced by lightning and to extract the average LNO<sub>2</sub> and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> vertical profiles that are needed to calculate the air mass factor with simulations nudged towards lightning data from Meteosat 12 LI. The WRF-Chem model has demonstrated effectiveness in calculating UV-visible air mass factors, which are crucial for deriving vertical column densities of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from nadir-viewing satellite measurements of NO<sub>2</sub> slant column densities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.40"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1059">This paper is organized as follows: Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> describes the data and methodology; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> presents the main results, discusses their implications and limitations; and Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> concludes with final remarks and future research directions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data sets and methods</title>
      <p id="d2e1076">This Section describes the data and methodology. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/> describes the TROPOMI operational and research cloud and NO<sub>2</sub> products. The lightning measurements are described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> presents the case study selection. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/> describes the air mass factor and bakcground-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> calculations based on WRF-Chem model simulations. Finally, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/> presents the method to calculate the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE. The complete methodology is summarized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1121"> Overview of the methodological framework used to investigate lightning-produced NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> using satellite observations, ground-based lightning measurements, and numerical modeling.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>TROP-DLR Operational and Research Products</title>
      <p id="d2e1146">TROPOMI, operating since 13 October 2017 from a low Earth polar orbit onboard the  European Space Agency Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite, is a passive imaging spectrometer with eight  spectral bands from ultraviolet (UV) to shortwave infrared (SWIR). It provides daily global measurements of cloud properties and several trace gases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx110" id="paren.41"/>, with overpasses at approximately 13:30 local solar time.</p>
      <p id="d2e1152">In this study, we used the TROP-DLR operational cloud and NO<sub>2</sub> research products  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.42"/>, which were recently applied by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="text.43"/> for LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE  estimates.  The TROP-DLR operational cloud and NO<sub>2</sub> research products provide the slant column density (SCD) of NO<sub>2</sub>, the associated SCD error, the quality assurance (QA) value, the stratospheric vertical column density (VCD) of NO<sub>2</sub>, the stratospheric air mass factor (AMF) of NO<sub>2</sub>, the cloud fraction (CF), the cloud optical thickness (COT), and the optical centroid pressure (OCP), with a horizontal resolution at nadir of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The TROP-DLR NO<sub>2</sub> research product is better suited for estimating LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> than the operational TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> product, as it provides more reliable cloud properties and NO<sub>2</sub> retrievals over bright surfaces, such as thunderclouds. Cloud properties are derived using the OCRA/ROCINN algorithms within the Clouds-As-Layers (CAL)  model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.44"/>, which treats clouds as optically uniform layers and employs a more realistic cloud scattering approach than the Cloud as Reflecting Boundaries (CRB) model implemented in the operational TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx109" id="paren.45"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1286">The TROP-DLR NO<sub>2</sub> research product further applies the Directionally dependent STRatospheric Estimation Algorithm from Mainz (DSTREAM) to separate the contributions of the troposphere and stratosphere to the NO<sub>2</sub> column density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.46"/>, without relying on atmospheric model inputs. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="text.47"/>, we selected  TROPOMI pixels with SCD NO<sub>2</sub> errors below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Pixels with deep convection were defined as those with an effective cloud fraction greater than 0.95 and an OCP below 534 hPa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.48"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Lightning measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e1364">The MTG-LI onboard Meteosat-12 satellite   <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.49"/> was launched on 13 December 2022. Pre-operational Meteosat 12 LI (previously Meteosat Third Generation, MTG) L2 data were publicly released 4 July 2024, and are declared operational on 31 October 2024 at 10:00 UTC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.50"/>. Meteosat 12 LI detects continuously optical signal emitted by lightning from geostationary orbit focused around 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude, providing near-continuous views of the Earth's full disk, including Europe, Africa, the Atlantic Ocean and parts of South America <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.51"/>. The CMOS detector of Meteosat 12 LI detects light at 1 kHz sampling frequency within a 1.9 nm wide band centered on the atomic oxygen triplet at 777 nm, with a 4.5 km resolution at sub-satellite point (0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude, 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.52"/>. Meteosat 12 LI L2 data include lightning detections at three hierarchical levels: events, groups, and flashes. Events are pixels illumined by lightning during one frame. Events are clustered into a group if they are within one LI frame and spatially contiguous. Finally, flashes are formed by groups separated by less than 330 ms and within about 16 km of each other. Relevant physical information about flashes and groups provided by Meteosat 12 LI L2 data is used in this study, such as flash and groups id, flash and group time, flash duration, flash and group coordinates, total flash radiance, number of groups in a flash, and flash footprint. It is important to note that flash and group properties, such as radiance, duration, and footprint, are influenced not only by the intrinsic characteristics of the lightning but also by the cloud structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.53"/>. Apart from the flash and group explicitly included in the Meteosat 12 LI L2 data, we have produced two new variables to account for the time continuity of the optical signal of flashes detected by Meteosat 12 LI. These variables are the total number of time-contiguous groups per flash and the ratio of flashes containing at least 5 ms of time-contiguous optical signal to the total number of flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI in each flash. The reason for defining  these new variables is that the duration of flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI does not contain information about the total time in which the discharge is optically active. It is important to note that time contiguous optical signal of flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI could be a proxy for continuing current in CG, but also for in-cloud lightning activity. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.54"/> classified lightning flashes reported by the Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) as CG flashes with continuing current using a criterion of at least 10 ms of time-continuous signal. However, the GLM, in geostarionary orbit as Meteosat 12 LI, has a low detection efficiency for the optical signal emitted by continuing currents  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.55"/> and is more sensitive to in-cloud activity associated with CG lightning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx114" id="paren.56"/>. Therefore, we cannot use Meteosat 12 LI solely to distinguish the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> produced by continuing currents or by time contiguous in-cloud activity to determine if continuing currents lasting more than 5 ms produce more LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in CG strokes than shorter CG strokes, as proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="text.57"/>. However, we can analyze possible relationships between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and the time continuity of the optical signal of lightning detected by Meteosat 12 LI to better understand the role of continuing currents and in-cloud continuous activity in the emissions of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>.  The total number of time-contiguous groups per flash and the ratio of flashes containing at least 5 ms of time-contiguous optical signal to the total number of flashes are determined  by using Meteosat 12 LI L2 group data. A time-contiguous group is defined as a set of groups within the same flash where at least one group occurs with a time difference of less than 1.1 ms.</p>
      <p id="d2e1453">The Ebro Lightning Mapping Array (eLMA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.58"/> is a VHF time-of-arrival network <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.59"/> that was initially established in the Ebro Valley in 2011 and has been operational since then. Between 2023 and 2025, the eLMA network expanded up to 30 stations. The now so-called XCALMA (eXtended CAtalonia Lightning Mapping Array) extends the eLMA coverage mostly to the northern and eastern regions of Catalonia, with 15 new rev. 5 stations deployed by the Meteorological Service of Catalonia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.60"/>. Furthermore, the initial 15 eLMA stations were enhanced to the LMA rev. 5 version <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx107" id="paren.61"/>. In this study, we use lightning data reported by XCALMA between 4 July 2024 and 4 May 2025, based on measurements from the 24 active stations shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>. Lightning sources are located using a minimum of 5 or 6 stations.  The 3-dimensional locations of VHF sources in time reported by XCALMA are clustered into flashes in a different way than the previous study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.62"/>, which used eLMA data. The data are initially processed using a simple filter to remove scattered sources (fewer than 3 sources in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km grid cell within a 100 ms interval). A DBSCAN-based flash clustering method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.63"/> was refined <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx107" id="paren.64"/> using two passes in order to perform better for both convective and stratiform flashes. The first pass groups sources at 300 ms and 4 km separation criteria. The second pass identifies convective and stratiform flash regions, and proceeds to recluster the associated sources with longer time and distance criteria to prevent the large stratiform flashes from being broken into multiple small flashes.  At greater distances from the LMA network continuous leader activity within a flash <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="paren.65"/> is no longer detectable, and the vertical position accuracy is reduced. For this reason, maps of quality metrics were produced to select storms used for this study.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="text.66"/> compared lightning detection between XCALMA and Meteosat 12 LI, revealing that the DE of Meteosat 12 LI and XCALMA are comparable for thunderstorms with low lightning activity (below 15 flashes per minute). However, the DE of Meteosat 12 LI decreases significantly for more active thunderstorms. Conversely, the study also reported an increase in the DE of Meteosat 12 LI for higher intracloud (IC) flash rates.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1504"> Left panel: 98th percentile vertical density score  (vdensity98) averaged over all the flashes analyzed in this study and contained in each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Right panel: Masked data showing only pixels with vdensity98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, showing the region with the best quality XCALMA data. Locations of the XCALMA sensors are included (red triangles).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1540">The variables of each flash extracted from XCALMA for this study include the median flash latitude and longitude, flash start time, flash channel length, flash volume, flash duration, and the 98th percentile vertical density score (vdensity98). The vdensity is calculated using the standard deviation of altitude in 10 ms time steps. It clusters horizontally within every 10 ms, and for each cluster, the metric is defined as the square root of the number of sources in the cluster divided by the variance of their altitudes.  This metric correlates inversely with the horizontal and, in particular, the vertical dispersion of points around the true location. Subsequently, vdensity98 is calculated per flash, indicating the quality of the best part of the flash. The vdensity98 ranges approximately up to 100, with higher values indicating better quality. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>, we show the 98th percentile vertical density score averaged over all the flashes analyzed in this study and contained in each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude and longitude grid boxes.</p>
      <p id="d2e1561">We incorporate CG lightning data provided by the Lightning Location System (LLS) operated by the Meteorological Service of Catalonia (SMC) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="paren.67"/>. In particular, we calculate the ratio of CG flashes detected by the SMS-LLS to the total number of flashes reported by XCALMA. The SMC-LLS is composed of four LS8000 and three LS-7002 stations (Vaisala Inc.) covering the region of Catalonia, including the Ebro Valley. CG strokes are detected by a Low Frequency (LF) sensor and located using a combination of the Time-of-Arrival/Magnetic Direction Finding techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.68"/>. Like other Vaisala's LLSs based on this technology, the flash algorithm implemented in the SMC-LLS relies on the criteria of the U. S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN). Throughout the years of operation, the SMC-LLS performance has been experimentally evaluated in successive campaigns by means of electromagnetic field measurements and video recordings of natural lightning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.69"/>, with a CG flash detection efficiency around 90 % and a location accuracy below 1 km. The method selected for grouping CG strokes into flashes significantly impacts the annual count of lightning flashes. Grouping algorithms primarily depend on two key characteristics of a lightning flash: its spatial extent and total duration. Since the mid-1990s upgrade of the U.S. NLDN, other LLSs based on the same technology have adopted the “NLDN” grouping criteria  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.70"/>. Under these criteria, a subsequent stroke is grouped with the first return stroke to form a flash if the stroke occurs within 1 s of the first return stroke, its location is within 10 km of the first return stroke, and the time interval between successive strokes is less than or equal to 500 ms. These criteria have remained largely unchanged through subsequent processor upgrades and changes in NLDN ownership <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx98" id="paren.71"/>. More recently, the International Standard IEC 62858 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.72"/> has also adopted this flash algorithm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Case study selection</title>
      <p id="d2e1591">The case study selection is done by the following method. First, we identify candidate dates by filtering days between 4 July  2024, and 4 May 2025, with at least 650 flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI within the latitude range of 39.5 to 42.9° N and the longitude range of 1.5° W to 4.5° E, and between 07:00 and 14:00 UTC. This spatial region is chosen as it encompasses most of the area where the LMA vdensity98 exceeds 15 (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). The 07:00–14:00 UTC time window is selected because the TROPOMI overpass occurs approximately between 12:00 and 14:00 UTC in all cases. This yields 35 candidate dates, as shown in Table S1 in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d2e1596">After this preselection of dates, we analyze the spatial distribution of lightning activity and discard dates where no electrical activity cores are centered in the area where the LMA vdensity98 exceeds 15. Twelve dates are excluded based on this criterion, as detailed in Table S1. We further analyze the remaining dates and exclude those with fewer than 650 flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI in the 5 h preceding the TROPOMI overpass, or where the average flash age exceeds 3.5 h, thereby excluding an additional 4 dates (see Table S1). The age of each flash defined as the hours between the flash occurrence and the overpass of TROPOMI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.73"/>. Finally, we exclude the date 17 October 2024, as TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> observations indicated that the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> was advected outside the LMA-covered area, where most lightning occurred. This results in the selection of the 18 dates shown in Table S1. Finally, we define the region of interest (ROI) for each date based on the more active thunderstorm within  the latitude range of 39.5 to 42.9° N and the longitude range of 1.5° W to 4.5° E from the spatial distribution of Meteosat 12 LI lightning flash activity, CF and OCP.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Air mass factor and background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> calculations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>2.4.1</label><title>Simulated LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions</title>
      <p id="d2e1655">The model WRF‐Chem <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.74"/>, version 4.3., is employed to estimate the case-based background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> not produced by lightning and to extract the average LNO<sub>2</sub> and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> vertical profiles needed for calculating the air mass factor of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in each TROPOMI pixel (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1713">Simulations were performed using two two-way nested domains. The outer domain (d01) had a horizontal grid spacing of 10 km (300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 grid points) between 32 and 47° N latitude, and between 14.5° W and  16.5° E degrees longitude. The inner domain (d02) had a resolution of 2 km (406 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 366 grid points) between 37 and 42.9° N degrees latitude, and between 3.2° W and 5° E degrees longitude. To improve the vertical resolution of the simulation in both domains, the WRF preprocessing system was used to interpolate the meteorological input data from 34 to 37 vertical levels. This adjustment enhances the ability of the model to resolve atmospheric processes, particularly in the boundary layer and upper atmosphere, leading to more accurate and physically consistent simulations. The parent-child grid ratio was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both space and time, and feedback from the inner to the outer domain was enabled. The model time step was 50 s in the outer domain. The base simulations with LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> spanned three days, with the day of the TROPOMI overpass included as the final day of the integration, in order to ensure at least two days of model spin-up prior to the analysis period. Initial and boundary meteorological conditions were obtained from analyses of the NCEP GDAS/FNL 0.25 Degree Global Tropospheric Analyses and Forecast Grids <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.75"/> by using the WRF Preprocessing System <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="paren.76"/>. Boundary conditions were updated every 6 h. Model outputs were saved every 60 min (d01) and 10 min (d02).</p>
      <p id="d2e1758">Microphysics was represented using the WRF Single-Moment 6-class scheme (WSM6) scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.77"/>. Longwave and shortwave radiation were computed with the RRTM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.78"/> and Goddard scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.79"/>, respectively, with a radiation time step of 2 min. Surface layer fluxes were calculated using Monin-Obukhov similarity theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.80"/>, land surface processes were represented with the Noah Land Surface Model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.81"/>, and the planetary boundary layer was parameterized using the Yonsei University (YSU) scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.82"/>. Deep convection was parameterized only in the 10 km domain using the Grell 3D ensemble cumulus scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.83"/>, while convection was explicitly resolved in the 2 km domain. Upper-level damping was applied above 5 km. Grid nudging (FDDA) was applied during the first 2 d of simulation with relaxation coefficients of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−4</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> for wind, temperature, and water vapor, excluding the planetary boundary layer.</p>
      <p id="d2e1815">Gas-phase and aerosol chemistry were simulated using MOZART gas-phase chemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.84"/> coupled with GOCART aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.85"/>.  Photolysis rates and biogenic emissions were updated every 15 min, and gas-phase chemistry time steps were 5 s (d01) and 1 s (d02). Dry deposition of gases and aerosols, wet scavenging, vertical mixing, and convective transport (outer domain only) were enabled. The “wesely” utility from the WRF-Chem preprocessor tool <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.86"/> was used for calculating dry deposition rates. In turn, the “exo-coldens” utility was employed for calculating O<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> column densities.  Aerosol-radiation feedback was disabled. Anthropogenic emissions were prescribed hourly from external files interpolated by the  “anthro-emiss” utility from EDGAR-HTAP anthropogenic emission files for the year 2010 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.87"/>. Biogenic emissions were prepared by the “bio-emiss” usility and were computed online <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.88"/>. Biomass burning emissions were created by the “fire-emiss” utility from Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN) input <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="paren.89"/> and included with plume-rise parameterization (30 min update frequency). Chemical initial and lateral boundary conditions were produced by the “mozbc” utility from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.90"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1858">Lightning nudging was applied in the nested domain with a 600 s interval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.91"/> by using Meteosat 12 LI lightning flash measurements to ensure  that deep convection occurred at the location of observed flashes and to place lightning-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions. Lightning NO emissions are parameterized using the lightning nudging scheme in the nested domain, with an emission rate of 311 moles of NO per flash. We have defined a production of 311 moles of NO per flash, based on the widely used values of 1112 moles per flash for CG flashes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.92"/>, 111.2 moles per flash for IC flashes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.93"/>, and a CG-to-total flash ratio of 0.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.94"/>. Previous studies have reported substantially different estimates of the amount of NO produced per lightning flash <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.95"/>. In the present study, the specific choice of the absolute LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production per flash is not expected to significantly affect our main conclusions, as our analysis focuses primarily on the relative variability of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE among individual thunderstorms, rather than on its absolute magnitude. Therefore, while the assumed emission factor influences the absolute LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentrations simulated by WRF-Chem, it should have a limited impact on the relative differences in LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE between the selected storm cases. In another set of simulations, the quantity of moles of NO emitted per flash is scaled using the ratio of the total number of flashes detected by the LMA to the total number of flashes detected by the Meteosat 12 LI within the region of interest. Given that the DE of XCALMA varies across the simulation domain, which extends beyond the region where vdensity98 exceeds 15, we adopted a simplified approach: rather than performing separate simulations with identical PE but differing total flash counts, we maintained a consistent total number of flashes in both simulations and adjusted the PE values accordingly. This method ensures a direct comparison of the impact of detection efficiency on the simulated outcomes. This approach enables the derivation of the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are subsequently used in the retrieval of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE using both the Meteosat 12 LI and LMA flash products. The vertical distribution of NO emissions follows the profiles described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.96"/>. To isolate the impact of fresh LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, we restarted the base simulations at 07:00 UTC (approximately 5 h before the TROPOMI overpass) and disabled LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions while preserving lightning nudging. This approach ensures that meteorological fields remain effectively unchanged.</p>
      <p id="d2e1977">The choice of a fixed amount of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash in the simulations may influence the mean LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash (LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE) results obtained in this study, as the background NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> estimation will be strongly affected by this quantity. However, the primary goal of this study is to analyze the variability in LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production per flash among different storms. Therefore, any potential bias introduced by assuming a fixed amount of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash in the simulations will likely affect all storms in a similar manner, allowing us to explore correlations between this variability and the observed characteristics of the flashes.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2037"> WRF-Chem simulation results for 6 July 2024 at 13:50 UTC, focused on the region of interest. <bold>(a)</bold> Assimilated lightning flashes between 08:50 and 13:50 UTC reported by Meteosat 12 LI. <bold>(b)</bold> Cloud Top Pressure (CTP). <bold>(c)</bold> Vertical Column Density of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. <bold>(d)</bold> Vertical column density of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in the simulation without fresh LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, i.e., with LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> deactivated after 07:00 UTC. Meteosat 12 LI lightning data © EUMETSAT.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e2095">The “wrf-python” tool <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="paren.97"/> is used to obtain the cloud fraction, the cloud top temperature and the cloud top pressure at each grid point. In this study, the tropopause is defined according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) criteria as the lowest atmospheric level at which the vertical temperature lapse rate decreases to 2 °C km<sup>−1</sup> or less, provided that this lapse rate is maintained over a minimum vertical extent of 2 km above this level <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="paren.98"/>. The tropopause height was calculated for each grid point in the model domain, integrating vertical profiles of temperature from the surface to the upper troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e2117">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> shows the simulation results for 6 July 2024 at 13:50 UTC, focused on the region of interest. The majority of the pixels with lightning activity in the previous 5 h (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a) are located in regions with CTP below 534 hPa (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b), indicating high convection. However, some lightning activity occurred in regions without significant convective activity at 13:50 UTC.  The signal of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> can be clearly seen by comparison of  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>c and d. The simulation results for other cases analyzed in this study can be seen in the Supplement (Figs. S1–S51).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>2.4.2</label><title>Background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and advection effects</title>
      <p id="d2e2155">The pairs of simulations with and without the effect of fresh LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1"/> were used to estimate the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> not produced by lightning and the effect of advection in LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in each studied case, both for the case of Meteosat 12 LI and LMA flashes. We extracted simulation outputs from the nested domain for the 10 min window closest to the TROPOMI overpass and 5 h prior. We then calculated the VCD of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> for all pixels where the cloud fraction was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the cloud top pressure was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">534</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa, integrating from the surface to the tropopause level. Finally, we compared simulations with and without fresh lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>) pixel by pixel to determine the ratio of the VCD attributable to fresh LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in pixels with lightning activity, named as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and in pixels without lightning activity, named as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, during the preceding 5 h. The ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over all the pixels with and without lightning will subsequently be used to estimate LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from TROPOMI measurements.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2300"> Vertical mixing ratio profiles of NO <bold>(a)</bold>, NO<sub>2</sub> <bold>(b)</bold>, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> <bold>(c)</bold>, LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and LNO<sub>2</sub> <bold>(d)</bold> extracted from WRF-Chem simulations with (solid lines) and without (dashed lines) fresh LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> on 6 July 2024 at 13:50 UTC (close to the TROPOMI overpass (background: bck)). </p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e2367">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> shows the vertical mixing ratio profiles of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from WRF-Chem simulations with and without fresh LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> on 6 July 2024 at 13:50 (close to the TROPOMI overpass). These vertical profiles have been obtained by averaging over simulation grid boxes  where the cloud fraction was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the cloud top pressure was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">534</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa, and only over the ROI, that is, between 42 and 42.9° N degrees latitude, and between 0° W and  3.5° E degrees longitude. The tropopause height in this case is 16.7 km, and it is located at 99.8 hPa pressure level. The vertical mixing ratio profiles of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from WRF-Chem simulations with and without fresh LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> for other dates analyzed in this study can be seen in the Supplement (Figs. S1–S51).</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2451">Tropopause levels from the WRF-Chem simulation, ratio of the VCD attributable to fresh LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in pixels with lightning activity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and in pixels without lightning activity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each analyzed date.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropopause level (hPa)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MTG)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (MTG)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (LMA)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">R<sub><italic>n</italic><italic>f</italic></sub>  (LMA)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-07-06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">99.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-07-21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">113.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">99.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">99.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">145.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">145.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-09-02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">145.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-09-03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">145.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-09-21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">164.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-10-15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">186.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-10-31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">211.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-11-01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">186.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-11-13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">239.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2025-04-15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">271.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2025-04-19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">211.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2025-04-26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">186.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2025-05-04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">211.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.51</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2972">The obtained ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the tropopause level, are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>. The pressure at the tropopause is lower during summer months, as expected. The ratio of the tropospheric NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> produced by lightning is higher in simulation grid boxes with lightning than in boxes without lightning. In turn, the ratio is larger in simulations with  LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions escalated with the total number of flashes reported by the LMA, which is larger than the total number of flashes detected by Meteosat 12 LI.  Additionally, the ratio of tropospheric NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> produced by lightning is elevated during the summer months, potentially due to an increased planetary boundary layer height, which facilitates greater vertical mixing and accumulation of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in the troposphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>2.4.3</label><title>Air mass factor of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub></title>
      <p id="d2e3054">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is required to calculate the VCD of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from the SCD of NO<sub>2</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.99"/> provided by the TROP-DLR NO<sub>2</sub> research product. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated by following the method proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.100"/> and later used by, for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx77" id="text.101"/>. We used the  algorithm of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx18" id="text.102"/>  to calculate the scattering weights for each of the studied cases using the viewing geometry and the cloud properties for each TROPOMI pixel, based on a look up table generated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.103"/> with TOMRAD forward vector radiative transfer model. The calculated scattering weights at each TROPOMI pixel are combined with the LNO<sub>2</sub> and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> vertical profiles from the WRF-Chem simulations (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1"/>) to calculate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at each TROPOMI pixel. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated by integrating Eqs. (2) and (3) of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.104"/> between the surface and the tropopause level over all simulation grid points where the cloud fraction was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.95 and the cloud top pressure was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">534</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimations</title>
      <p id="d2e3221">The calculation of the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE is based on a modification of the algorithm proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.105"/> and later used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.106"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.107"/>.  The LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE in units of mol of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> produced per flash is calculated as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M195" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI or the LMA in the analyzed region and up to 5 h before the overpass of TROPOMI, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the age of each flash defined as the hours between the flash occurrence and the overpass of TROPOMI,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the area (cm<sup>−2</sup>) of the thunderstorm, defined as the area of TROPOMI pixels satisfying the Deep Convective Constraint (DCC), which are the pixels with a cloud fraction equal or greater than 0.95 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.108"/>, and OCP equal or lower than 534 hPa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.109"/> or with undefined OCP. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Avogadro's number (molec. mol<sup>−1</sup>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the lifetime of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in the near-field of convection, in hours. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is uncertain and can vary between 2 h and 2 d <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.110"/> depending on the altitude of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions within the particular thunderstorm and subsequent transport. In this study, we primarily assume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be 5 h, as it is a commonly employed value in the literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.111"/>, which also consider <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h, and aligns with the temporal window of flashes included in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). To account for the variability in results due to this choice, we also performed calculations using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h. DE stands for the flash detection efficiency, ranging between 0 and 1. We assume a DE of 1 for the LMA and 0.75 for Meteosat 12 LI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.112"/>. Finally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> produced by recent lightning (molec. cm<sup>−2</sup>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx77" id="text.113"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.114"/> calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the median VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>  over TROPOMI pixels satisfying the DCC criteria minus  a given value of background derived from measurements or TROPOMI pixels without flashes in the same day or before, or from previous aircraft measurements close to the investigated region. In this study, we calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by using the WRF-Chem simulations as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M215" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the total number of TROPOMI pixels satisfying the DCC criteria that contain and do not contain Meteosat 12 LI flash groups, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are derived from WRF-Chem simulations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). The advantage of using high-resolution WRF-Chem simulations over other methods is that, by emitting LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> at the exact locations where lightning has been reported, the model faithfully reproduces the advection of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and its interaction with other chemical species. This allows for the determination of the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> ratio relative to the total tropospheric NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> at each grid point.  Although the horizontal resolution of the simulations and TROPOMI pixels is not exactly the same as the horizontal resolution of WRF-Chem simulations, we utilized the coefficients from the table because TROPOMI pixels do not exhibit significant variations from case to case.  Additionally, their resolutions are of the same order of magnitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the median values of VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>  over pixels  satisfying the DCC criteria that contain and do not contain Meteosat 12 LI flash groups, respectively. Given that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the union of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nf</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is calculated as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M232" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">V</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">stratNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the SCD of NO<sub>2</sub> and the stratospheric AMF from the TROP-DLR NO<sub>2</sub> research product, respectively. Only TROPOMI pixels with SCD NO<sub>2</sub> errors below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.115"/>. Finally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the AMF of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> derived from WRF-Chem simulations and using the algorithm of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx18" id="text.116"/> (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3"/>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">V</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">stratNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the average of the product <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">V</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">stratNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4141">Additionally, we have estimated the averaged  LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE  in terms of molec NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per meter, per second or per unit of radiance (mW m<sup>−2</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup>) by modifying Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) to better account for the metrics of individual flashes and the influence of their ages as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M247" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the metric representing the flash channel length,  the radiance, or the duration of the flash <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by Meteosat 12 LI or the LMA.</p>
      <p id="d2e4309">As an alternative approach, we modified Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the difference between the median VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>  over TROPOMI pixels satisfying the DCC criteria and the 10th and the 30th percentiles of the tropospheric VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> over TROPOMI non-flashing pixels (i.e., pixels without detected lightning activity), as previously proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.117"/>. This alternative formulation facilitates comparison with the results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.118"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.119"/> for the same region.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e4366">This section presents the key results of the study, along with a detailed discussion of their implications. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/> presents the vertical column densities of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> derived from TROP-DLR product, alongside the corresponding lightning observations. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/> presents the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> estimates and analyzes their relationships with lightning characteristics. Finally, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/> discusses the uncertainties and limitations of this study, with a focus on how key input parameters in the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> retrieval process influence the observed relationships between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and lightning characteristics.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4414"> TROP-DLR product of orbit 34875, Meteosat 12 LI and LMA lightning data for the case 6 July 2024. <bold>(a)</bold> Slant Column Density (SCD) NO<sub>2</sub> provided by the TROP-DLR NO<sub>2</sub> research product. <bold>(b)</bold> SCD NO<sub>2</sub> minus the stratospheric vertical column density multiplied by the stratospheric air mass factor of NO<sub>2</sub> (AMF<sub>strat</sub>) obtained from the TROP-DLR NO<sub>2</sub> research product. <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> Cloud Fraction (CF) and Optical Centroid Pressure (OCP) from the TROP-DLR NO<sub>2</sub> research product, respectively. <bold>(e)</bold> VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) over pixels satisfying the Deep Convective Constraint (DCC). <bold>(f)</bold> and <bold>(g)</bold> Lightning flashes during the 5 h period per TROPOMI pixel before the TROPOMI overpass reported by Meteosat 12 LI and the LMA, respectively. <bold>(h)</bold> TROPOMI pixels containing at least one lightning group detected by Meteosat 12 LI. Sentinel-5P TROPOMI data © ESA, processed by DLR. Meteosat 12 LI lightning data © EUMETSAT.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Estimated Vertical column density of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from TROP-DLR and lightning observations</title>
      <p id="d2e4556">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> shows the TROP-DLR products, lightning measurements and calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the case 6 July 2024, while the figures showing the rest of the analyzed dates are provided in Figs. S1–S51. In the majority of the analyzed cases, a distinct enhancement in the SCD NO<sub>2</sub> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a, b) is observed in or near TROPOMI pixels characterized by high lightning activity in the last 5 h, as in the TROPOMI orbits analyzed in other studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.120"/>. However, this enhancement is not evident in all cases, particularly on 6 July, 23 August, 25 August, 2 September, and 31 October 2024. Nevertheless, when the VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>e) is calculated using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which incorporates cloud properties (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c, d), observation geometry, and simulated LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> vertical profiles, the enhancement in TROPOMI pixels with or near lightning activity becomes apparent. In turn, a clear similarity between the spatial distribution of the OCP (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d) and the lightning activity (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>f, g) can be seen. The spatial distribution of flashes detected by Meteosat 12 LI and the LMA do not show large discrepancies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>f, g), with the small differences observed likely attributable to the parallax correction applied in Meteosat 12 LI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.121"/>. In fact, larger differences emerge when comparing the spatial distribution of individual flashes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>f, g) and groups detected by Meteosat 12 LI (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>h). These differences suggest that relying solely on the flash product may introduce inaccuracies in distinguishing between TROPOMI pixels with and without lightning activity, as lightning flashes coordinates are estimated as the radiance-weighted geometrical centroid of the groups detected by Meteosat 12 LI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.122"/> or by the median coordinates of the sources detected by the LMA. However, each lightning flash may not be fully contained within a single TROPOMI pixel. By using the flash groups reported by Meteosat 12 LI, we can access information about the TROPOMI pixels that actually contain at least a portion of a flash. Note that the VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>e) can have negative values, indicating  that the average stratospheric column exceeds the local vertical column <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.123"/>. The TROP-DLR products, lightning measurements and calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for other cases analyzed in this study can be seen in the Supplement (Figs. S1–S51).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4677"> Total number flashes detected by Meteosat 12 LI, LMA and CG flashes detected by LLS-SMC up to 5 h before the overpass of TROPOMI <bold>(a)</bold>, mean age of the flashes detected by Meteosat 12 LI and the LMA <bold>(b)</bold>,  total number of valid TROPOMI pixels satisfying the Deep Convective Constraint (DCC), total number of TROPOMI pixels with Meteosat 12 LI or LMA flashes satisfying the DCC <bold>(c)</bold>, and ratio of the total number of CG flashes to all flashes detected by the LMA. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4695">The comparison of WRF-Chem simulation and TROPOMI measurements indicates that the CTP (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b) and the OCP (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d) are nearly in agreement, with a slight displace of the simulated high clouds westward. The simulated tropospheric VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in areas with high convection (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>c) is consistently displaced westward, and lower in about 1 order of magnitude than the tropospheric VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> calculated from measurements (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>e). The  obtained disagreement in the maximum simulated and measurements-based tropospheric VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> can be due to different horizontal resolutions in simulations and measurement, as well as the inherent uncertainties in the WRF-Chem model, such as emission inventories, chemical reaction rates, meteorological inputs, or parameterizations of physical processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e4735">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> and Table S2 shows the basic measurements for each analyzed date. The LMA detects 1.3 to 6.5 times more flashes than the Meteosat 12 LI. The ratio of CG flashes reported by the LLS-SMC to total flashes reported by the LMA ranges between 0.01 and 0.39. There are no significant differences in the average age of flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI and the LMA. The average OCP ranges between 323.07 and 499.34 hPa, which are typical values in thunderstorms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.124"/>. The percentage of valid TROPOMI pixels satisfying the DCC that contain Meteosat 12 LI lightning flashes with respect to pixels without flashes ranges between 9 % and 46 %. In turn, the ratio of  the total number of TROPOMI pixels satisfying the DCC and containing flashes according to the Meteosat 12 LI to the pixels containing flashes according to the LMA ranges between 0.7 and 1.4, indicating that there are no significant differences in the spatial distribution of flashes detected by both instruments.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e4746">Analyzed dates, average footprint, average radiance, average duration from Meteosat 12 LI, average total number of time contiguous groups per flash, average flash channel length, average flash volume, average flash duration from LMA, LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE based on Meteosat 12 LI and LMA lightning flash measurements with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Av.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Av. Rad</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Av.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cont.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">N<sub><italic>c</italic><italic>c</italic></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Av.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Av. vol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Av. LMA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Footprint</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(mW m<sup>−2</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MTG-LI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">groups</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">length</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(km<sup>3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">duration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(MTG-LI)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(LMA)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(MTG-LI)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(LMA)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(px)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"> sr<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">duration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(km)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(ms)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>/f</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>/f</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>/f</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>/f</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(ms)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-07-06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">257.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">163</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3999</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">220</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">15.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">11.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">16.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">12.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-07-21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">285.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">212</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">71 714</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">529</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">250</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">12.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">20.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">288.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">186</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8626</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">250</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">62.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">25.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">56.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">46.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">313.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">205</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">43 855</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">406</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">39.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">310</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">39.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">29.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">46.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">35.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">152.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">136</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2213</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">73.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">51.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">76.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">55.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">218.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">161</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2164</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">24.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">18.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">2.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-08-25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">186.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">159</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2228</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-09-02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">266.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">168</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16 444</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">190</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">26.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">19.67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-09-03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">534.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">291</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">296 477</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1831</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">23.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">360</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">47.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">39.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">67.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">27.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-09-21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">392.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">215</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17 003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">156</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">23.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">32.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">29.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">27.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-10-15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">451.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 532</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">109</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">21.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">26.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">25.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">26.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-10-31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">731.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">339</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">55 251</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">67.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">55.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">370</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">44.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">45.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">32.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">32.71</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-11-01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">910.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">340</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">44 201</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">353</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">75.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">340</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">84.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">103.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">55.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">57.30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024-11-13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">666.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">273</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28 146</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">476</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">62.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">62.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">18.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">21.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">35.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">37.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2025-04-15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">414.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">256</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8694</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">508</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">60.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">50.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">380</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">28.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">107.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">136.32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2025-04-19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">821.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">374</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14 606</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">69.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">62.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">420</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">30.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">41.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">50.35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2025-04-26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">909.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">326</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17 788</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">221</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">41.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">39.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">370</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">34.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">41.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">35.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">37.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2025-05-04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">227.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">182</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5312</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">47.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">41.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">310</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">79.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">66.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">86.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">72.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">430</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">228</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">43 700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">250</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">276</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(SD)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(2.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(221)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(68)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(75 100)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(280)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(20)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(19)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(64)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(32)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(32)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Relationships between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and lightning characteristics</title>
      <p id="d2e6076">The characteristics of lightning flashes analyzed in this study and the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. There are notable variations in the characteristics of lightning flashes detected by Meteosat 12 LI. The average footprint ranges from 4.88 to 14.59 Meteosat 12 LI pixels, with a mean value of approximately 7.71 pixels, indicating spatial variability in the optical extent of detected events. The average radiance spans a broad range from 152.69 to 910.57 mW m<sup>−2</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup>, reflecting substantial differences in the optical intensity of the flashes. This variability may be attributed to differences in the energy released during lightning events and to differences in the cloud opacity. Regarding the average duration of Meteosat 12 LI detected flashes, values range from 159 to 374 ms, with a mean duration of around 230 ms.  The average flash channel length reported by the LMA ranges from 12.33 to 75.48 km, and the average flash volume spans from 8.60 to 64.93 km<sup>3</sup> (number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km boxes),  indicating substantial variability in the spatial extent of lightning channels. Additionally, the average duration of LMA-detected flashes ranges from 170 to 420 ms, with a mean duration of approximately 295 ms, slightly longer than the average duration provided by Meteosat 12 LI. The obtained average LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> the standard deviation with Meteosat 12 LI flash data and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h is 37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash, while it is 31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash when using the LMA lightning flash data. When setting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h, we obtain  41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and 38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31 per flash when using Meteosat 12 LI and LMA lightning data, respectively. The approximately similar LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE obtained with both lightning data sources suggests that the WRF-Chem simulations used in the estimation of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE help mitigate the impact of the difference in the total number of flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI and the LMA (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). The averaged LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE obtained in this study falls at the lower end of the range of previous estimations in the same region, ranging between 42 and 108 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.125"/>. In turn, the obtained LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE falls at the lower end of the widely consensus value, ranging between 100 and 400 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.126"/>.  However, it is important to mention that the obtained averaged LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE value is significantly influenced by the production of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash assumed in WRF-Chem simulations, as shown in the last four columns of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. Alternatively, we approximated the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> by considering the 10th and the 30th percentiles of the tropospheric VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> over TROPOMI non-flashing pixels (i.e., pixels without detected lightning activity) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.127"/>. Based on LMA lightning data, we obtained  116 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 89 and  49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 47 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash by considering the 10th and the 30th percentiles, respectively. These values are in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="text.128"/>, who employed similar methods to estimate the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e6381">Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) and corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (as defined in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) and various lightning flash characteristics, computed across TROPOMI pixels included in the 18 analyzed dates. These results are based on calculations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pixels</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spearman <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Pearson <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Flash Length (LMA)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2637</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.218</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.188</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Flash Volume (LMA)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2637</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.181</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.99</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.176</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Flash Duration (LMA)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2637</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.207</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.174</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Radiance (MTG)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2475</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.159</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.031</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Footprint (MTG)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2475</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.066</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Flash Duration (MTG)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2475</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.178</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.066</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e6830">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> shows the Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients and corresponding p-values between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (as defined in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) and various lightning flash characteristics, computed across all TROPOMI pixels included in the 18 analyzed dates. Only pixels with values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the 5th and the 95th percentiles are included in the calculation of the correlation coefficients in order to exclude outliers. The lightning characteristics for each TROPOMI pixel were derived by averaging the respective values over all lightning flashes occurring within that pixel. The Spearman correlation coefficients presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> reveal measurable, albeit weak, associations between lightning flash characteristics and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Among the analyzed variables, footprint exhibits the weakest correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tropLNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting a less pronounced influence compared to other flash characteristics. Nevertheless, the results indicate that the properties of lightning flashes, such as length, volume, duration, and radiance, play an appreciable role in the production of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. The data employed to calculate the correlations presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> are shown in Fig. S52.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e6914"> Spearman correlation heatmap of the most important lightning characteristics and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates. These results are based on caculations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6944">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> shows a Spearman monotonic correlation heatmap of the most important lightning characteristics and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h.  There are strong direct relationships between the average flash channel length (LMA – av. Length), median flash channel length (LMA – med. length) flash volume (LMA – volume) and flash duration (LMA – duration) estimates by the LMA and the average footprint (MTG – footprint), radiance (MTG – rad) and duration (MTG – duration) reported by Meteosat 12 LI. These correlations indicates consistency in the methods used to cluster LMA sources into flashes and Meteosat 12 LI groups into flashes. In turn, the high correlation between durations and geometric variables, such as flash channel length, flash volume and duration, suggests that larger flashes then to have longer durations. There is a significant direct correlation between the flash length and the age of flashes (Flash age), showing that flashes that occur near the sunrise are longer than flashes that occur near the mid-day, which is consistent with previous findings of shorter flashes in more active thunderstorms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.129"/>. In the same manner, there is an even stronger correlation between the age of the flashes and the footprint, radiance and duration reported by Meteosat 12 LI, indicating that Meteosat 12 LI is capable of reporting a longer and brighter signal of flashes during early morning than during the mid-day, due to the lower DE when the sun is close to the zenith.  Conversely, a higher DE during the early morning could allow Meteosat 12 LI to capture more weak flashes that would otherwise be missed when the DE is lower. However, the effect of observing a larger portion of bigger flashes when the DE is higher ultimately dominates. As shown by the LMA measurements reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.130"/>, small flashes are typically less numerous than large flashes early in the day. The total number of time contiguous groups (MTG – Cont. Groups) and the ratio of flashes with at least 5 ms of time contiguous optical signal to the total number of Meteosat 12 LI (MTG – CC (5 ms)/f) flashes is moderately correlated with the flash channel length, the flash volume and the flash duration provided by the LMA, while they are strongly correlated with the footprint, radiance and duration measured by Meteosat 12 LI.</p>
      <p id="d2e6976">The ratio of CG flashes to total flashes (CG/f) is strongly correlated with the flash channel length, flash volume, duration, footprint and radiance (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>), indicating that CG flashes are longer in duration, larger and brighter from space than IC flashes. Similar results were obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="text.131"/> for GLM lightning measurements. The  ratio of CG flashes to total flashes reported is moderately correlated with the total number of time contiguous groups and with the ratio of flashes with at least 5 ms of time contiguous optical signal, indicating that CG flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI tend to have longer time contiguous optical signals detected by Meteosat 12 LI. This may be due to the presence of continuing currents in CG, or to longer in-cloud stroke activity in CG flashes than in IC flashes.</p>
      <p id="d2e6984">The ratio of the total number of flashes reported by the LMA (N LMA flashes) to the total flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI (N MTG flashes) is inversely correlated with the OCP (TROP-DLR OCP) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>), indicating that the detection efficiency of Meteosat 12 LI with respect to the LMA is higher when the cloud tops are lower, possibly due to lower cloud opacity in the travel of the light between the emitting source and Meteosat 12 LI. In turn, the ratio of the total number of flashes reported by the LMA to the total flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI is inversely correlated with the average footprint and with the ratio of CG flashes to total flashes, indicating that  the detection efficiency of Meteosat 12 LI with respect to the LMA is higher for brighter flashes, particularly for CG flashes. The positive correlation observed between the total number of flashes detected by the LMA and the ratio of this quantity to the total number of flashes reported by Meteosat 12 LI suggests that the DE of Meteosat 12 LI decreases for more active thunderstorms, in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="text.132"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6992">The analysis of the flash initiation altitude (LMA – start altitude) reveals that lightning initiated at lower altitudes exhibits greater spatial extent, longer duration, and higher radiance as observed by MTG, likely due to the predominance of CG flashes, which tend to be more energetic and prolonged  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>). Additionally, lower initiation altitudes correlate with a higher number of flashes lasting at least 5 ms and elevated OCP values (indicating lower cloud tops). Conversely, lightning initiated at higher altitudes, though typically smaller in size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.133"/>, is more effectively detected by LMA than MTG, suggesting higher DE of LMA than MTG for smaller flashes.</p>
      <p id="d2e7000">The LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE is positively correlated with the flash channel length, the flash volume and the flash duration estimates by the LMA and the footprint, radiance, duration and total number of contiguous groups per flash reported by Meteosat 12 LI (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>), indicating that larger, brighter and longer duration flashes produce more LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. The stronger correlations are obtained when comparing the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE based on LMA flash measurements  with the average flash channel length, the flash volume and the flash duration, in agreement with previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.134"/>. There is a weak positive correlation between the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the total number of Meteosat 12 LI time contiguous groups, as well as with the ratio of flashes with at least 5 ms of time contiguous optical signal, indicating that time contiguous emissions could contribute to a larger LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE.</p>
      <p id="d2e7055">The lack of significant correlations between the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the average flash age indicates that the assumption of a temporal window of 5 h and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h do not introduce a significant bias in the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>). In turn, the lack of significant correlations between the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the average OCP suggests that the calculation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not introduce a significant bias (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>). The  Spearman monotonic correlation heatmap with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h is shown in Fig. S53, indicating minor differences with the results obtained by using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e7143"> Pearson correlation between the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the most important lightning characteristics included in this study. The average LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE (blue points) is obtained as the average between the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates by using both Meteosat 12 LI and the LMA for each analyzed case, while each pair of grey bars are the values of the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates by using Meteosat 12 LI and the LMA separately. The flash channel length, the flash volume and the flash durations in panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> are the average values calculated from LMA measurements. The footprint, the radiance, the flash durations and the total number of contiguous groups per flash in panels <bold>(d)</bold>, <bold>(e)</bold>, <bold>(f)</bold> and <bold>(g)</bold> are the average values calculated from Meteosat 12 LI measurements. The average ratio of CG to total flashes in panel <bold>(h)</bold> is obtained from LLS-SMC and LMA lightning measurements. Each subplot includes the Pearson correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and its corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value, as well as a linear fitting of the blue points (red line). These results are based on caculations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14277/2026/acp-26-14277-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e7240">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> shows the Pearson linear correlations between the average LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the most important lightning characteristics with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h, while nearly similar results are shown in Fig. S54 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h. The average LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE is obtained as the average between the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates by using both Meteosat 12 LI and the LMA. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>a, b and c shows a positive linear correlation between the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the average flash channel length, volume and duration estimated from LMA measurements, respectively. In turn,  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>d, e and f show a positive but weaker linear correlation between the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the average footprint, radiance  and duration based on the Meteosat 12 LI flash product, respectively. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx1" id="text.135"/> reported that the correlation between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the flash energy reported by GLM ranged between 0.18 and 0.57, which is consistent with the 0.3578 correlation reported in this study (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>e).</p>
      <p id="d2e7334">There is a positively and moderate correlation between the total number of contiguous Meteosat 12 LI groups per flash and the  LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>d. The correlation between the  LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the total number of contiguous groups per flash is lower than the correlation with the total duration measured by the LMA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>c, g). Geostationary lightning detection optical systems detect more efficiently in-cloud activity than cloud-to-ground processes, especially during the occurrence of continuing currents in CG strokes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx114" id="paren.136"/>. The lower correlation of the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE with the total number of contiguous groups per flash than with the total duration reported by the LMA (0.36 vs 0.68) indicates that there may be lightning activity below clouds not detected by Meteosat 12 LI that contributes to the production of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. Finally, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>h indicates a positive linear  correlation between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE  and the ratio of CG to total flashes.</p>
      <p id="d2e7392">The linear positive correlations between the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and the characteristics of lightning measured by the LMA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>a–c) are stronger than the correlations with the lightning metrics reported by Meteosat 12 LI (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>d–g) especially due to differences in two particular cases, that are the 14 August 2024 and the 4 May 2025. These cases are characterized by medium flashes in terms of flash channel length, volume, duration from the LMA and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE, but small and short in terms of the optical signal detected by Meteosat 12 LI. This suggests that the lightning characteristics measured by the LMA are better proxies for the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE than Meteosat 12 LI flash properties, potentially due to the effect of cloud cover in the optical signals detected from space.</p>
      <p id="d2e7427">The obtained LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE in molecules of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per meter obtained as the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE averaged over the 18 analyzed cases divided by the averaged flash channel length with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>) is 0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>21</sup> molec. NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> m<sup>−1</sup>, which falls in the lower range of previous estimates based on laboratory and aircraft measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113 bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx101" id="paren.137"/>, with theoretical results based on electrodynamical models ranging between 0.045 and 0.106 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>21</sup> molec. NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> m<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.138"/>, and with TROPOMI based estimates in the same region, ranging between 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>21</sup> and 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>21</sup> molec. NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> m<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.139"/>.  In turn, we have estimated the averaged  LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE  in terms of molec NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per meter from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>), obtaining 0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>21</sup> molec. NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> m<sup>−1</sup>. Additionally, we have estimated the averaged  LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE  in terms of molec NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per second of discharge by using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>), yielding 6.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>25</sup> molec. NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> s<sup>−1</sup> of duration reported by Meteosat 12 LI, and  6.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  10<sup>25</sup> molec. NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> s<sup>−1</sup> of duration reported by the LMA. Finally, we have calculated the averaged  LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE  in terms of molec NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash radiance seen by Meteosat 12 LI from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>), obtaining a production of  9.79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>22</sup> molec. NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per mW m<sup>−2</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Limitations and uncertainties</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Uncertainty in the obtained LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and lightning observations</title>
      <p id="d2e7860">The main limitations and sources of uncertainties related with nadir-based estimations of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx77" id="text.140"/> and  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="text.141"/>,  ranging from approximately 20 % to 50 %, applies to this study. However, in our present study  some of them have been partially mitigated by introducing modifications to the methods developed to estimate the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the total number of flashes.</p>
      <p id="d2e7902">In this study, the uncertainty in the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimate was evaluated by addressing key sources of error identified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.142"/>. Specifically, we targeted the 29 % uncertainty attributed to the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> estimate, the 30 % uncertainty attributed to the parameterization of lightning activity in atmospheric models, which affected the a priori profiles of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and LNO<sub>2</sub>, scattering weights, and DCC definitions, and the 7 % uncertainty due to the lightning dataset DE. By running WRF-CHEM simulations nudged towards observed lightning data instead of relying on parameterizations, we expect the 30 % source of uncertainty  to be significantly reduced. Additionally, we mitigated the 29 % influence of the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> estimate by using Meteosat 12 LI reported groups combined with high horizontal spatial resolution simulations. Furthermore, the use of the upgraded Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) over the Ebro Valley, with its high detection efficiency (DE), allowed us to reduce the 7 % uncertainty associated with the lightning dataset. Assuming independent error sources, the total uncertainty was recalculated as the square root of the sum of the remaining squared contributions provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.143"/>. If we only account for the maximum reduction in background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and lightning dataset uncertainties, the overall uncertainty is reduced by up to 20 %. However, if we also consider the elimination of the 30 % uncertainty from lightning parameterization and related factors, the total uncertainty reduction could reach about 41 %. This means that the total uncertainty, ranging from approximately 20 % to 50 % according to  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="text.144"/>, would be reduced to a range of 12 % to 40 % .This improvement underscores the critical role of accurate lightning and background estimations in constraining LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE estimates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Uncertainty in the obtained relationships between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and lightning characteristics</title>
      <p id="d2e7996">More significant than the absolute LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE values are the relationships between the case-to-case variability of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and lightning characteristics. Figures S53 and S54 indicate that variation in the assumed lifetime of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in the near-field of convection (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) does not significantly influence the obtained relationships between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and lightning characteristics.</p>
      <p id="d2e8042">We analyze the influence of the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> estimate in the obtained relationships between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and lightning characteristics by applying different methods to estimate the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. In addition to estimating background NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from WRF-Chem simulations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>), we also approximated the background NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> by considering the 10th and the 30th percentiles of the tropospheric VCD NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> over TROPOMI non-flashing pixels (i.e., pixels without detected lightning activity) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.145"/>, as well as without substracting the background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. The results, presented in Fig. S55, indicate that the choice of method for calculating background NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> has no significant impact on the observed relationships between lightning characteristics and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE, as all obtained correlations are positive regardless of the method used to estimatethe background-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>.</p>
      <p id="d2e8142">Regarding the uncertainty in the characteristics of lightning flashes, the upgraded LMA network XCALMA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.146"/> provides better estimations than the results reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.147"/>. In particular, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.148"/> reported the average flash channel lengths for only a portion of the studied thunderstorms due to the limited and inhomogeneous coverage of the previous LMA network. However, in this study we have been able to explore the characteristics of lightning in the entire analyzed thunderstorm cells. In turn, the strong correlations obtained between the geometric and temporal lightning characteristics derived from both LMA and Meteosat 12 LI observations further reinforce the robustness of our results.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e8164">This study examined the correlations between the geometric and temporal characteristics of lightning flashes in the Ebro Valley in Spain, as measured by LSS, LMA and Meteosat 12 LI systems, and their impact on LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production efficiency (LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE). The results reveal positive correlations between lightning properties, such as flash channel length, volume, duration, and radiance, the ratio of CG to total flashes, and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production. While these correlations are moderate, their statistical significance underscores the relevance of lightning characteristics in tropospheric LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions.</p>
      <p id="d2e8203">Estimates of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production per flash showed slight differences depending on the measurement system and the assumption of the lifetime of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in the near-field of convection (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h,  the mean value is 37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash for Meteosat 12 LI flashes, while it is 31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash when using the LMA lightning flash data. When setting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h, we obtain 41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 and 38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31 mol NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash when using Meteosat 12 LI and LMA lightning data, respectively. The averaged LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE derived in this work lies toward the lower bound of previously reported estimates for the same region, which span from 42 to 108 moles of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> per flash <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.149"/>.  However, it is important to note that this study primarily focuses on determining the storm-to-storm variability of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. It does not aim to retrieve an absolute value for NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> produced per flash. This is because the background NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> was calculated from WRF-Chem simulations, which already incorporate an assumed LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>  PE as an input parameter.</p>
      <p id="d2e8370">The strong correlation between LMA and Meteosat 12 LI geometry and duration measurements reinforces the consistency and robustness of the results, validating the combined use of both systems for studying atmospheric electrical activity and its chemical impact. According to the results of this study, the lightning characteristics measured by the LMA are better proxies for the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE than Meteosat 12 LI flash properties, potentially due to the effect of cloud cover in the optical signals detected from space. Positive but weak correlations between contiguous optical signals detected from space and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE are lower than the correlation between the total duration of lightning flashes and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE. This suggests that there may be in- or below-cloud lightning processes with highly attenuated optical signals that are contributing to LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions. Overall, these findings contribute to a deeper understanding of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions and their dependence on lightning properties, providing a solid foundation for improving atmospheric models and environmental impact assessments related to thunderstorms.</p>
      <p id="d2e8418">In this study, we have refined the method to estimate the LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and used an upgraded LMA (XCALMA) with respect to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.150"/>, as well as including new Meteosat 12 LI lightning data. We analyzed a new set of thunderstorms, obtaining results that are consistent with those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.151"/>. However, significant sources of uncertainty remain that may influence the obtained results. The relationships between LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE and lightning characteristics, such as flash channel length, volume, radiance, footprint, and duration, are consistently positive regardless of the approach used to estimate LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE. Nevertheless, these uncertainties complicate the quantification of these relationships. Future research could address these challenges by exploring additional factors, such as thunderstorm temporal evolution, the vertical structure of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions, or vertical profiles of relative humidity, to further refine these estimates. Combination of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> estimates with systematic monitoring of lightning with continuing current could provide valuable insights into the observed variability of LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> PE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.152"/>. The launch of the geostationary Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.153"/> provides air composition measurements over the Americas. Additionally, the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Sounder <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.154"/>, launched in 2025, is equipped with the Copernicus Sentinel-4 Ultraviolet-Visible-Near-Infrared (UVN) imaging spectrometer, which will report air composition, including tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> estimates. Meanwhile, the MTG Infrared Sounder (IRS) will deliver vertical profiles of humidity and temperature over Europe. Together, these instruments will enable a deeper understanding of the relationships between thunderstorm evolution, lightning activity, and LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions. In particular, the combination of MTG-IRS and MTG-UVN <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.155"/> with the upgraded XCALMA network across the Ebro Valley could significantly advance our knowledge of the key factors contributing to LNO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions, thereby improving their representation in atmospheric models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8527">The official TROPOMI data are available via ESA's public data hub after registration (<uri>https://www.tropomi.eu/data-products</uri>, last access: 27 May 2026). The TROP-DLR operational cloud and NO<sub>2</sub> research products are available on request. Meteosat 12 LI Level 2 lightning flashes and groups can be freely downloaded from EUMETSAT's webpage  <uri>https://data.eumetsat.int/product/EO:EUM:DAT:0691</uri>, <uri>https://data.eumetsat.int/product/EO:EUM:DAT:0782</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.156"/>. XCALMA lightning data are available from UPC Lightning Research Group (<uri>https://elma.upc.edu</uri>, last access: 27 May 2026) by e-mail to a member of the group (<uri>https://elma.upc.edu/contacto</uri>, last access: 27 May 2026) or by contacting the Servei Meteorològic de Catalunya. SMC-LLS data shall be requested from the Servei Meteorològic de Catalunya. The WRF-Chem model used, version 4.3.1, is freely available from the developers' website (<uri>https://github.com/wrf-model/WRF/releases</uri>, last access: 27 May 2026), with the pre-processor tools available from NCAR's website (<uri>https://www.acom.ucar.edu/wrf-chem/download.shtml</uri>, last access: 27 May 2026). National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Final (FNL) Operational Global Analysis meteorological data used to drive the WRF-Chem simulations are downloaded from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Research Data Archive website (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6M043C6</ext-link>, NCEP/NWS/NOAA/USDC, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.157"/>), with the chemistry data used to force WRF-Chem, the output of the Community Atmosphere Model with chemistry (CAM-Chem) model, extracted from NCAR's website (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/NMP7-EP60" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/NMP7-EP60</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="altparen.158"/>). The data of the simulations generated in this study have been deposited in the Zenodo repositories <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20065621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20065621</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19588416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19588416</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.159"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e8586">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-14277-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-14277-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e8595">FJPI: conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, project administration, funding acquisition, writing (original draft). FJGV: conceptualization, project administration, funding acquisition, writing (review and editing). OVDV: methodology, software, investigation, data curation, writing (review and editing). JM: resources, project administration, funding acquisition, writing (review and editing). JALT: resources, writing (review and editing). NP: resources,  funding acquisition, writing (review and editing). DL: resources, data curation, writing (review and editing). SS: resources, data curation, writing (review and editing). CK: methodology, writing (review and editing). AOF: software, writing (review and editing). HH: conceptualization, writing (review and editing).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e8601">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e8607">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e8613">This study is part of the project RYC2022-035821-I, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FSE+ (FJPI). Additionally, this work was supported by grants PID2022-136348NB-C31 and PID2025-169163NB-C31 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and “ERDF A way of making Europe”.  F.J.P.I. and F.J.G.V. acknowledge financial support from the grant CEX2021-001131-S funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. The UPC work was supported by research grants from the Spanish Ministry (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) PID2022-136348NB-C32, and EQC2021-006957-P. The high performance computing simulations (HPC) have been carried out on the DRAGO supercomputer of CSIC. We acknowledge use of the WRF-Chem preprocessor tool (mozbc, fire-emiss, etc.) provided by the Atmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling Lab (ACOM) of NCAR.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e8618">This research has been supported by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (grant nos. RYC2022-035821-I, PID2022-136348NB-C31, PID2022-136348NB-C32, PID2025-169163NB-C31, EQC2021-006957-P, and CEX2021-001131-S).The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered in part by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e8627">This paper was edited by James Lee and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Allen et al.(2021a)Allen, Pickering, Bucsela, Van Geffen, Lapierre, Koshak, and Eskes</label><mixed-citation>Allen, D., Pickering, K. E., Bucsela, E., Van Geffen, J., Lapierre, J., Koshak, W., and Eskes, H.: Observations of Lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> Production From Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument Case Studies Over the United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD034174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD034174</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Allen and Pickering(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Allen, D. J. and Pickering, K. E.: Evaluation of lightning flash rate parameterizations for use in a global chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002066</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Allen et al.(2019)Allen, Pickering, Bucsela, Krotkov, and Holzworth</label><mixed-citation>Allen, D. J., Pickering, K. E., Bucsela, E., Krotkov, N., and Holzworth, R.: Lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production in the tropics as determined using OMI NO<sub>2</sub> retrievals and WWLLN stroke data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 13498–13518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029824" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029824</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Allen et al.(2021b)Allen, Pickering, Lamsal, Mach, Quick, Lapierre, Janz, Koshak, Kowalewski, and Blakeslee</label><mixed-citation>Allen, D. J., Pickering, K. E., Lamsal, L., Mach, D. M., Quick, M. G., Lapierre, J., Janz, S., Koshak, W., Kowalewski, M., and Blakeslee, R.: Observations of Lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> Production From GOES R Post Launch Test Field Campaign Flights, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e33769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033769" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033769</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Barth et al.(2015)Barth, Cantrell, Brune, Rutledge, Crawford, Huntrieser, Carey, MacGorman, Weisman, Pickering et al.</label><mixed-citation>Barth, M. C., Cantrell, C. A., Brune, W. H., et al.: The deep convective clouds and chemistry (DC3) field campaign, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 96, 1281–1309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Beirle et al.(2009)Beirle, Salzmann, Lawrence, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Beirle, S., Salzmann, M., Lawrence, M. G., and Wagner, T.: Sensitivity of satellite observations for freshly produced lightning NOx, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1077–1094, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1077-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1077-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Beirle et al.(2010)Beirle, Huntrieser, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Beirle, S., Huntrieser, H., and Wagner, T.: Direct satellite observation of lightning-produced NOx, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10965–10986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10965-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10965-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bitzer(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Bitzer, P. M.: Global distribution and properties of continuing current in lightning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 1033–1041, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bližňák and Sokol(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Bližňák, V. and Sokol, Z.: First validation of the Lightning Imager aboard Meteosat Third Generation satellite with Earth Networks Total Lightning Network, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 147, 105205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jag.2026.105205</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Boccippio et al.(2001)Boccippio, Cummins, Christian, and Goodman</label><mixed-citation>Boccippio, D. J., Cummins, K. L., Christian, H. J., and Goodman, S. J.: Combined satellite-and surface-based estimation of the intracloud–cloud-to-ground lightning ratio over the continental United States, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 108–122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129&lt;0108:CSASBE&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129&lt;0108:CSASBE&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Bozóki et al.(2025)Bozóki, Mlynarczyk, Prácser, Kulak, Sátori, Füllekrug, and Williams</label><mixed-citation>Bozóki, T., Mlynarczyk, J., Prácser, E., Kulak, A., Sátori, G., Füllekrug, M., and Williams, E.: Modeling the global electromagnetic resonance field produced by lightning discharges with a continuing current, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2025JD043989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043989" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025JD043989</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Brasseur et al.(1998)Brasseur, Hauglustaine, Walters, Rasch, Müller, Granier, and Tie</label><mixed-citation>Brasseur, G. P., Hauglustaine, D., Walters, S., Rasch, P., Müller, J.-F., Granier, C., and Tie, X.: MOZART, a global chemical transport model for ozone and related chemical tracers: 1. Model description, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 28265–28289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02397" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD02397</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Bruning and MacGorman(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Bruning, E. C. and MacGorman, D. R.: Theory and observations of controls on lightning flash size spectra, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 4012–4029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0289.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-12-0289.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Bruning and Thomas(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Bruning, E. C. and Thomas, R. J.: Lightning channel length and flash energy determined from moments of the flash area distribution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8925–8940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023766" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023766</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Buchholz et al.(2019)Buchholz, Emmons, Tilmes, and Team</label><mixed-citation>Buchholz, R., Emmons, L., Tilmes, S., and Team, T.: CESM2. 1/CAM-chem instantaneous output for boundary conditions, UCAR/NCAR-Atmospheric chemistry observations and modeling Laboratory [data set], 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/NMP7-EP60" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/NMP7-EP60</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Bucsela et al.(2013)Bucsela, Krotkov, Celarier, Lamsal, Swartz, Bhartia, Boersma, Veefkind, Gleason, and Pickering</label><mixed-citation>Bucsela, E. J., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Lamsal, L. N., Swartz, W. H., Bhartia, P. K., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Gleason, J. F., and Pickering, K. E.: A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments: applications to OMI, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2607–2626, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Bucsela et al.(2021)Bucsela, Pickering, Allen, Loyola, Eskes, Veefkind, van Geffen, Koshak, and Krotkov</label><mixed-citation>Bucsela, E., Pickering, K., Allen, D., Loyola, D., Eskes, H., Veefkind, P., van Geffen, J., Koshak, W., and Krotkov, N.: Improved Lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> Production Estimates Using TROPOMI and GLM Data, AGU Fall Meeting 2021,  New Orleans, LA, 13–17 December 2021,  A24E–07, <uri>https://studio.m-anage.com/agu/fm21/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/983228</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Bucsela et al.(2019)Bucsela, Pickering, Allen, Holzworth, and Krotkov</label><mixed-citation>Bucsela, E. J., Pickering, K. E., Allen, D. J., Holzworth, R. H., and Krotkov, N. A.: Midlatitude lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production efficiency inferred from OMI and WWLLN data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 13475–13497, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD030561</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Camino-Faillace et al.(2026)Camino-Faillace, Gordillo-Vázquez, Pérez-Invernón, Montanyà, Młynarczyk, Neubert, Chanrion, and Østgaard</label><mixed-citation>Camino-Faillace, P. A., Gordillo-Vázquez, F., Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Montanyà, J., Młynarczyk, J., Neubert, T., Chanrion, O., and Østgaard, N.: Optical and radio characterization of continuing current lightning with ASIM, GLM and ELF sensors, Atmos. Res.,  108578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108578" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108578</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Chin et al.(2000)Chin, Rood, Lin, Müller, and Thompson</label><mixed-citation>Chin, M., Rood, R. B., Lin, S.-J., Müller, J.-F., and Thompson, A. M.: Atmospheric sulfur cycle simulated in the global model GOCART: Model description and global properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 24671–24687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900384" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900384</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Chou and Suarez(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: A solar radiation parameterization for atmospheric studies, Tech. rep., NASA Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA/TM-1999-104606, Vol. 15, <uri>https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19990060930</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Chronis et al.(2015)Chronis, Lang, Koshak, Blakeslee, Christian, McCaul, and Bailey</label><mixed-citation>Chronis, T., Lang, T., Koshak, W., Blakeslee, R., Christian, H., McCaul, E., and Bailey, J.: Diurnal characteristics of lightning flashes detected over the São Paulo lightning mapping array, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 11–799, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023960" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023960</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Cummins and Murphy(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Cummins, K. L. and Murphy, M. J.: An overview of lightning locating systems: History, techniques, and data uses, with an in-depth look at the US NLDN, IEEE T. Electromagn. C., 51, 499–518, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Cummins et al.(1998)Cummins, Murphy, Bardo, Hiscox, Pyle, and Pifer</label><mixed-citation>Cummins, K. L., Murphy, M. J., Bardo, E. A., Hiscox, W. L., Pyle, R. B., and Pifer, A. E.: A combined TOA/MDF technology upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 9035, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD00153</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Dahlmann et al.(2011)Dahlmann, Grewe, Ponater, and Matthes</label><mixed-citation>Dahlmann, K., Grewe, V., Ponater, M., and Matthes, S.: Quantifying the contributions of individual NOx sources to the trend in ozone radiative forcing, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2860–2868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.071</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Dang et al.(2026)Dang, Jacob, He, Clifton, Li, and Liao</label><mixed-citation>Dang, R., Jacob, D. J., He, M., Clifton, O. E., Li, K., and Liao, H.: Lightning Source of Nitrogen Oxides (NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>) Inferred From Geostationary Satellites: Global Implications for Oxidant Chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 53, e2026GL124557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2026GL124557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2026GL124557</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Ding et al.(2024)Ding, Zhu, Lapierre, DiGangi, Ringhausen, Lauria, Saba, Rakov, Abbasi, da Silva et al.</label><mixed-citation>Ding, Z., Zhu, Y., Lapierre, J., DiGangi, E., Ringhausen, J., Lauria, P. B., Saba, M. M., Rakov, V. A., Abbasi, R. U., da Silva, D. R., and da Silva, T. P.: Continuing current seen above and below the cloud: Comparing observations from GLM and high-speed video cameras, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2024GL110099, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024GL110099</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Dobber and Grandell(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Dobber, M. and Grandell, J.: Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Lightning Imager (LI) instrument performance and calibration from user perspective, in: The Characterization and Radiometric Calibration for Remote Sensing Annual Meeting (CALCON 2014), Logan, UT, USA, <uri>https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/calcon/CALCON2014/All2014Content/13/</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Ek et al.(2003)Ek, Mitchell, Lin, Rogers, Grunmann, Koren, Gayno, and Tarpley</label><mixed-citation>Ek, M., Mitchell, K., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V., Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J.: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003296</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Enno et al.(2025)Enno, Viticchie, Navia, and Grandell</label><mixed-citation>Enno, S.-E., Viticchie, B., Navia, D., and Grandell, J.: Meteosat-12 Lightning Imager: first year of observations and the main performance characteristics, 12th European Conference on Severe Storms, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 17–21 Nov 2025, ECSS2025-152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ecss2025-152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ecss2025-152</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>EUMETSAT(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>EUMETSAT: LI Lightning Flashes – MTG – 0 degree (Version 1.0), <uri>https://data.eumetsat.int/product/EO:EUM:DAT:0691</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>EUMETSAT(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>EUMETSAT: LI Lightning Flashes – MTG – 0 degree (Version 1.0), <uri>https://data.eumetsat.int/product/EO:EUM:DAT:0782</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Fairman and Bitzer(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Fairman, S. I. and Bitzer, P. M.: The detection of continuing current in lightning using the geostationary lightning mapper, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2020JD033451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033451</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Fehr et al.(2004)Fehr, Höller, and Huntrieser</label><mixed-citation>Fehr, T., Höller, H., and Huntrieser, H.: Model study on production and transport of lightning-produced NOx in a EULINOX supercell storm, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003935" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003935</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Fierro et al.(2012)Fierro, Mansell, Ziegler, and MacGorman</label><mixed-citation>Fierro, A. O., Mansell, E. R., Ziegler, C. L., and MacGorman, D. R.: Application of a lightning data assimilation technique in the WRF-ARW model at cloud-resolving scales for the tornado outbreak of 24 May 2011, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2609–2627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00299.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-11-00299.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Fuchs et al.(2016)Fuchs, Bruning, Rutledge, Carey, Krehbiel, and Rison</label><mixed-citation>Fuchs, B. R., Bruning, E. C., Rutledge, S. A., Carey, L. D., Krehbiel, P. R., and Rison, W.: Climatological analyses of LMA data with an open-source lightning flash-clustering algorithm, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8625–8648, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024663" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024663</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Gedik et al.(2025)Gedik, Mansouri, Kohlmann, Schulz, and Rubinstein</label><mixed-citation>Gedik, E., Mansouri, E., Kohlmann, H., Schulz, W., and Rubinstein, M.: Performance Evaluation of Meteosat Third Generation Lightning Imager in Detecting Lightning Discharges, in: 2025 International Symposium on Lightning Protection (XVIII SIPDA), IEEE,  1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/SIPDA68639.2025.11296657" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/SIPDA68639.2025.11296657</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Gordillo-Vázquez et al.(2019)Gordillo-Vázquez, Pérez-Invernón, Huntrieser, and Smith</label><mixed-citation>Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Huntrieser, H., and Smith, A. K.: Comparison of Six Lightning Parameterizations in CAM5 and the Impact on Global Atmospheric Chemistry, Earth Space Sci., 6, 2317–2346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000873" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019EA000873</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Grell and Dévényi(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Grell, G. A. and Dévényi, D.: A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 38-1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015311</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Grell et al.(2005)Grell, Peckham, Schmitz, McKeen, Frost, Skamarock, and Eder</label><mixed-citation>Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G., Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Guenther et al.(2012)Guenther, Jiang, Heald, Sakulyanontvittaya, Duhl, Emmons, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Holmlund et al.(2021)Holmlund, Grandell, Schmetz, Stuhlmann, Bojkov, Munro, Lekouara, Coppens, Viticchie, August et al.</label><mixed-citation>Holmlund, K., Grandell, J., Schmetz, J., Stuhlmann, R., Bojkov, B., Munro, R., Lekouara, M., Coppens, D., Viticchie, B., August, T., Theodore, B., Watts, P., Dobber, M., Fowler, G., Bojinski, S., Schmid, A., Salonen, K., Tjemkes, S., Aminou, D., and Blythe, P.: Meteosat Third Generation (MTG): Continuation and innovation of observations from geostationary orbit, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 102, E990–E1015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Hong and Lim(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Hong, S.-Y. and Lim, J.-O. J.: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6), Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Hu et al.(2013)Hu, Klein, and Xue</label><mixed-citation>Hu, X.-M., Klein, P. M., and Xue, M.: Evaluation of the updated YSU planetary boundary layer scheme within WRF for wind resource and air quality assessments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 10–490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50823" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50823</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Huntrieser et al.(2002)Huntrieser, Feigl, Schlager, Schröder, Gerbig, Van Velthoven, Flatøy, Théry, Petzold, Höller et al.</label><mixed-citation>Huntrieser, H., Feigl, C., Schlager, H., Schröder, F., Gerbig, C., Van Velthoven, P., Flatøy, F., Théry, C., Petzold, A., Höller, H., and Schumann, U.: Airborne measurements of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, tracer species, and small particles during the European Lightning Nitrogen Oxides Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000209</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Huntrieser et al.(2008)Huntrieser, Schumann, Schlager, Höller, Giez, Betz, Brunner, Forster, Pinto Jr, and Calheiros</label><mixed-citation>Huntrieser, H., Schumann, U., Schlager, H., Höller, H., Giez, A., Betz, H.-D., Brunner, D., Forster, C., Pinto Jr., O., and Calheiros, R.: Lightning activity in Brazilian thunderstorms during TROCCINOX: implications for NOx production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 921–953, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-921-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-921-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>International Electrotechnical Commission(2019)</label><mixed-citation>International Electrotechnical Commission: Lightning density – Methods for calculation using lightning location systems (LLS), <uri>https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/102016/9d0f88cdd88140a7859de60428d43d74/IEC-62858-2019.pdf</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Janjić(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Janjić, Z. I.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 927–945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122&lt;0927:TSMECM&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122&lt;0927:TSMECM&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Janssens-Maenhout et al.(2015)Janssens-Maenhout, Crippa, Guizzardi, Dentener, Muntean, Pouliot, Keating, Zhang, Kurokawa, Wankmüller et al.</label><mixed-citation>Janssens-Maenhout, G., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Dentener, F., Muntean, M., Pouliot, G., Keating, T., Zhang, Q., Kurokawa, J., Wankmüller, R., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J. J. P., Klimont, Z., Frost, G., Darras, S., Koffi, B., and Li, M.: HTAP_v2.2: a mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11411–11432, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Jenkins et al.(2021)Jenkins, Brune, and Miller</label><mixed-citation>Jenkins, J. M., Brune, W. H., and Miller, D. O.: Electrical discharges produce prodigious amounts of hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl radicals, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD034557</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Jöckel et al.(2016)Jöckel, Tost, Pozzer, Kunze, Kirner, Brenninkmeijer, Brinkop, Cai, Dyroff, Eckstein et al.</label><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F., Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B., Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S., Neumaier, M., Nützel, M., Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R., Scharffe, D., and Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1153–1200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Lapierre et al.(2020)Lapierre, Laughner, Geddes, Koshak, Cohen, and Pusede</label><mixed-citation>Lapierre, J. L., Laughner, J. L., Geddes, J. A., Koshak, W. J., Cohen, R. C., and Pusede, S. E.: Observing US regional variability in lightning NO<sub>2</sub> production rates, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031362" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031362</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Laughner and Cohen(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Laughner, J. L. and Cohen, R. C.: Quantification of the effect of modeled lightning NO<sub>2</sub> on UV–visible air mass factors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4403–4419, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4403-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-4403-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Lindfors et al.(2018)Lindfors, Kujanpää, Kalakoski, Heikkilä, Lakkala, Mielonen, Sneep, Krotkov, Arola, and Tamminen</label><mixed-citation>Lindfors, A. V., Kujanpää, J., Kalakoski, N., Heikkilä, A., Lakkala, K., Mielonen, T., Sneep, M., Krotkov, N. A., Arola, A., and Tamminen, J.: The TROPOMI surface UV algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 997–1008, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-997-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-997-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Liu et al.(2021)Liu, Valks, Pinardi, Xu, Chan, Argyrouli, Lutz, Beirle, Khorsandi, Baier et al.</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Valks, P., Pinardi, G., Xu, J., Chan, K. L., Argyrouli, A., Lutz, R., Beirle, S., Khorsandi, E., Baier, F., Huijnen, V., Bais, A., Donner, S., Dörner, S., Gratsea, M., Hendrick, F., Karagkiozidis, D., Lange, K., Piters, A. J. M., Remmers, J., Richter, A., Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., Wenig, M., and Loyola, D. G.: An improved TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 research product over Europe, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7297–7327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7297-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-7297-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Loyola et al.(2018)Loyola, Gimeno García, Lutz, Argyrouli, Romahn, Spurr, Pedergnana, Doicu, Molina García, and Schüssler</label><mixed-citation>Loyola, D. G., Gimeno García, S., Lutz, R., Argyrouli, A., Romahn, F., Spurr, R. J. D., Pedergnana, M., Doicu, A., Molina García, V., and Schüssler, O.: The operational cloud retrieval algorithms from TROPOMI on board Sentinel-5 Precursor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 409–427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-409-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-409-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Luhar et al.(2021)Luhar, Galbally, Woodhouse, and Abraham</label><mixed-citation>Luhar, A. K., Galbally, I. E., Woodhouse, M. T., and Abraham, N. L.: Assessing and improving cloud-height-based parameterisations of global lightning flash rate, and their impact on lightning-produced NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and tropospheric composition in a chemistry–climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7053–7082, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7053-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-7053-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Luque et al.(2020)Luque, Gordillo-Vázquez, Li, Malagón-Romero, Pérez-Invernón, Schmalzried, Soler, Chanrion, Heumesser, Neubert et al.</label><mixed-citation>Luque, A., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., Li, D., Malagón-Romero, A., Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Schmalzried, A., Soler, S., Chanrion, O., Heumesser, M., Neubert, T., Reglero, V., and Østgaard, N.: Modeling lightning observations from space-based platforms (CloudScat.jl 1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5549–5566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5549-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-5549-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Marchenko et al.(2025)Marchenko, Carr, Chong, Houck, Liu, Flittner, Joiner, Baker, Lasnik, and Nicks</label><mixed-citation>Marchenko, S. V., Carr, J. L., Chong, H., Houck, J. C., Liu, X., Flittner, D. E., Joiner, J., Baker, B. D., Lasnik, J. K., and Nicks, D. K.: TEMPO at night: Lightning flashes and on-orbit instrument performance, Earth Space Sci., 12, e2025EA004513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EA004513" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025EA004513</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Mlawer et al.(1997)Mlawer, Taubman, Brown, Iacono, and Clough</label><mixed-citation>Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S. A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 16663–16682, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00237</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Montanyà et al.(2006)Montanyà, Pineda, March, Illa, Romero, and Solà</label><mixed-citation>Montanyà, J., Pineda, N., March, V., Illa, A., Romero, D., and Solà, G.: Experimental evaluation of the Catalan lightning detection network, in: 19th international lightning detection conference, Tucson, <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nicolau-Pineda/publication/255570445_EXPERIMENTAL_EVALUATION_OF_THE_CATALAN_LIGHTNING_DETECTION_NETWORK/links/53f602e40cf22be01c3ff388/EXPERIMENTAL-EVALUATION-OF-THE-CATALAN-LIGHTNING-DETECTION-NETWORK.pdf">https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nicolau-Pineda/publication/255570445</ext-link> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Montanyà et al.(2012)Montanyà, Van der Velde, March, Romero, Solà, and Pineda</label><mixed-citation>Montanyà, J., Van der Velde, O. A., March, V., Romero, D., Solà, G., and Pineda, N.: High-speed video of lightning and X-ray pulses during the 2009–2010 observation campaigns in northeastern Spain, Atmos. Res., 117, 91–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.09.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.09.013</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Montanyà et al.(2014)Montanyà, van der Velde, Solà, Fabró, Romero, Pineda, and Argemí</label><mixed-citation>Montanyà, J., van der Velde, O., Solà, G., Fabró, F., Romero, D., Pineda, N., and Argemí, O.: Lightning flash properties derived from Lightning Mapping Array data, in: 2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), IEEE, 974–978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP.2014.6973264" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/ICLP.2014.6973264</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Montanyà et al.(2021)Montanyà, López, Morales Rodriguez, van der Velde, Fabró, Pineda, Navarro-González, Reglero, Neubert, Chanrion et al.</label><mixed-citation>Montanyà, J., López, J. A., Morales Rodriguez, C. A., van der Velde, O. A., Fabró, F., Pineda, N., Navarro-González, J., Reglero, V., Neubert, T., Chanrion, O., Goodman, S. J., Østgaard, N., Ladino-Rincon, A., Romero, D., Solà, G., Horta, R., and Freijó, M.: A Simultaneous Observation of Lightning by ASIM, Colombia-Lightning Mapping Array, GLM, and ISS-LIS, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033735</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Montanya et al.(2024)Montanya, Van Der Velde, López Trujillo, Pineda, Romero, Sola, Defer, Soula, Bruning, Viticchiè et al.</label><mixed-citation>Montanya, J., Van Der Velde, O., López Trujillo, J. A., Pineda, N., Romero, D., Sola, G., Defer, E., Soula, S., Bruning, E. C., Viticchiè, B., Enno, S.-E., Grandell, J., Gordillo-Vazquez, F. J., Perez-Invernon, F. J., Neubert, T., Chanrion, O., Ostgaard, N., and Victor, R.: MTG Lightning Imager performance during the first days of public data with the Ebro Lightning Mapping Array and the ASIM instrument on the ISS, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts,  2024, AE32A–01, <uri>https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AGUFMAE32A..01M/abstract</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Murphy and Nag(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, M. J. and Nag, A.: Cloud lightning performance and climatology of the US based on the upgraded US National Lightning Detection Network, in: Seventh Conf. on the Meteorological Applications of Lightning Data, <uri>https://ams.confex.com/ams/95Annual/webprogram/Manuscript/Paper262391/AMS2015_MALD_8.2_murphy.pdf</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Murray et al.(2012)Murray, Jacob, Logan, Hudman, and Koshak</label><mixed-citation>Murray, L. T., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Hudman, R. C., and Koshak, W. J.: Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017934</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)(2021)</label><mixed-citation>National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR): WRF-Chem, Atmospheric Chemistry Observations &amp; Modeling, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, <uri>https://www2.acom.ucar.edu/wrf-chem</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)(2024)</label><mixed-citation>National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR): Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) Model Output, [data set], d313006, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/G643-Z138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/G643-Z138</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>National Centers for Environmental Prediction(2015)</label><mixed-citation>National Centers for Environmental Prediction: NCEP GDAS/FNL 0.25 Degree Global Tropospheric Analyses and Forecast Grids, dataset: ds083.3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D65Q4T4Z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D65Q4T4Z</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce(2000)</label><mixed-citation>National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: NCEP FNL Operational Model Global Tropospheric Analyses, continuing from July 1999, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6M043C6</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Nault et al.(2017)Nault, Laughner, Wooldridge, Crounse, Dibb, Diskin, Peischl, Podolske, Pollack, Ryerson, Scheuer, Wennberg, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>Nault, B. A., Laughner, J. L., Wooldridge, P. J., Crounse, J. D., Dibb, J., Diskin, G., Peischl, J., Podolske, J. R., Pollack, I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Scheuer, E., Wennberg, P. O., and Cohen, R. C.: Lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> Emissions: Reconciling Measured and Modeled Estimates With Updated NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> Chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 9479–9488, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074436" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL074436</ext-link>, 2017GL074436, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Noh et al.(2003)Noh, Cheon, Hong, and Raasch</label><mixed-citation>Noh, Y., Cheon, W., Hong, S., and Raasch, S.: Improvement of the K-profile model for the planetary boundary layer based on large eddy simulation data, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 107, 401–427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022146015946" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1022146015946</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Ott et al.(2010)Ott, Pickering, Stenchikov, Allen, DeCaria, Ridley, Lin, Lang, and Tao</label><mixed-citation>Ott, L. E., Pickering, K. E., Stenchikov, G. L., Allen, D. J., DeCaria, A. J., Ridley, B., Lin, R.-F., Lang, S., and Tao, W.-K.: Production of lightning NOx and its vertical distribution calculated from three-dimensional cloud-scale chemical transport model simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD011880</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Pérez-Invernón(2026a)</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Invernón, F. J.: High-resolution atmospheric simulations using a modified WRF-Chem v4.3: Lightning effects on air quality in the Ebro Valley – Lightning nudging towards MTG-LI, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20065621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20065621</ext-link>, 2026a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Pérez-Invernón(2026b)</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Invernón, F. J.: High-resolution atmospheric simulations using a modified WRF-Chem v4.3: Lightning effects on air quality in the Ebro Valley – Lightning nudging towards MTG-LI scaled to XCALMA, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19588416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19588416</ext-link>, 2026b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Pérez-Invernón et al.(2022)Pérez-Invernón, Huntrieser, Erbertseder, Loyola, Valks, Liu, Allen, Pickering, Bucsela, Jöckel et al.</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Huntrieser, H., Erbertseder, T., Loyola, D., Valks, P., Liu, S., Allen, D. J., Pickering, K. E., Bucsela, E. J., Jöckel, P., van Geffen, J., Eskes, H., Soler, S., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., and Lapierre, J.: Quantification of lightning-produced NOx over the Pyrenees and the Ebro Valley by using different TROPOMI-NO2 and cloud research products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3329–3351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3329-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-3329-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Pérez-Invernón et al.(2023a)Pérez-Invernón, Gordillo-Vázquez, Huntrieser, and Jöckel</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., Huntrieser, H., and Jöckel, P.: Variation of lightning-ignited wildfire patterns under climate change, Nat. Commun., 14, 739, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36500-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-36500-5</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Pérez-Invernón et al.(2023b)Pérez-Invernón, Gordillo-Vázquez, van der Velde, Montanyá, López Trujillo, Pineda, Huntrieser, Valks, Loyola, Seo et al.</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., van der Velde, O., Montanyá, J., López Trujillo, J. A., Pineda, N., Huntrieser, H., Valks, P., Loyola, D., Seo, S., and Erbertseder, T.: Lightning-Produced Nitrogen Oxides Per Flash Length Obtained by Using TROPOMI Observations and the Ebro Lightning Mapping Array, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL104699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104699" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL104699</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Pérez-Invernón et al.(2025a)Pérez-Invernón, Gordillo-Vázquez, Huntrieser, Jöckel, and Bucsela</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., Huntrieser, H., Jöckel, P., and Bucsela, E. J.: Sensitivity of climate–chemistry model simulated atmospheric composition to the application of an inverse relationship between NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emission and lightning flash frequency, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5557–5575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5557-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-5557-2025</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Pérez-Invernón et al.(2025b)Pérez-Invernón, Ripoll, Gordillo-Vázquez, Luque, Camino-Faillace, Li, Neubert, Chanrion, and Østgaard</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Ripoll, J.-F., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., Luque, A., Camino-Faillace, P. A., Li, D., Neubert, T., Chanrion, O., and Østgaard, N.: A comprehensive analysis of optical emissions, production of NOx, HOx, and other chemical species by lightning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2025JD043972, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043972" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025JD043972</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Pickering et al.(1998)Pickering, Wang, Tao, Price, and Müller</label><mixed-citation>Pickering, K. E., Wang, Y., Tao, W.-K., Price, C., and Müller, J.-F.: Vertical distributions of lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> for use in regional and global chemical transport models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 31203–31216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD02651</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Pickering et al.(2016)Pickering, Bucsela, Allen, Ring, Holzworth, and Krotkov</label><mixed-citation>Pickering, K. E., Bucsela, E., Allen, D., Ring, A., Holzworth, R., and Krotkov, N.: Estimates of lightning NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production based on OMI NO<sub>2</sub> observations over the Gulf of Mexico, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8668–8691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024179</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Pickering et al.(2024)Pickering, Li, Cummings, Barth, Allen, Bruning, and Pollack</label><mixed-citation>Pickering, K. E., Li, Y., Cummings, K. A., Barth, M. C., Allen, D. J., Bruning, E. C., and Pollack, I. B.: Lightning NOx in the 29–30 May 2012 Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Severe Storm and Its Downwind Chemical Consequences, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD039439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JD039439</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Pickering et al.(2026)Pickering, Allen, and Huntrieser</label><mixed-citation>Pickering, K. E., Allen, D. J., and Huntrieser, H.: The role of lightning in atmospheric chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 131, e2026JD046484, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2026JD046484" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2026JD046484</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Pineda and Montanyà(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Pineda, N. and Montanyà, J.: Lightning detection in Spain: the particular case of Catalonia, Lightning: Principles, Instruments and Applications: Review of Modern Lightning Research,  161–185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9079-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-1-4020-9079-0</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Pineda et al.(2010)Pineda, Esteban, Trapero, Soler, and Beck</label><mixed-citation>Pineda, N., Esteban, P., Trapero, L., Soler, X., and Beck, C.: Circulation types related to lightning activity over Catalonia and the Principality of Andorra, Phys. Chem. Earth,  35, 469–476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.009</ext-link>,  2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Pineda et al.(2025)Pineda, Balagué, Fabró, Montanyà, van der Velde, Rodríguez, López, and Romero</label><mixed-citation>Pineda, N., Balagué, M., Fabró, F., Montanyà, J., van der Velde, O., Rodríguez, O., López, J. A., and Romero, D.: Validation of the MTG-LI with a Lightning Mapping Array (LMA): Evaluating Flash Rates within Intense Convective Storms, in: Proceedings of the 2025 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference, Lyon, France, <ext-link xlink:href="https://program-eumetsat2025.kuoni-congress.info/presentation/validation-of-the-mtg-lightning-imager-with-a-lightning-mapping-array-evaluating-flash-rates-within-intense-convective-storms">https://program-eumetsat2025.kuoni-congress.info/presentation/</ext-link> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Price et al.(1997)Price, Penner, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>Price, C., Penner, J., and Prather, M.: NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from lightning: 1. Global distribution based on lightning physics, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 5929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03504" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD03504</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Rahman et al.(2007)Rahman, Cooray, Rakov, Uman, Liyanage, DeCarlo, Jerauld, and Olsen III</label><mixed-citation>Rahman, M., Cooray, V., Rakov, V. A., Uman, M., Liyanage, P., DeCarlo, B., Jerauld, J., and Olsen III, R.: Measurements of NOx produced by rocket-triggered lightning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL027956</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Ringhausen et al.(2021)Ringhausen, Bitzer, Koshak, and Mecikalski</label><mixed-citation>Ringhausen, J., Bitzer, P., Koshak, W., and Mecikalski, J.: Classification of GLM flashes using random forests, Earth Space Sci., 8, e2021EA001861, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001861" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021EA001861</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Ripoll et al.(2014)Ripoll, Zinn, Jeffery, and Colestock</label><mixed-citation>Ripoll, J.-F., Zinn, J., Jeffery, C. A., and Colestock, P. L.: On the dynamics of hot air plasmas related to lightning discharges: 1. Gas dynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9196–9217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020068</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Rison et al.(1999)Rison, Thomas, Krehbiel, Hamlin, and Harlin</label><mixed-citation>Rison, W., Thomas, R. J., Krehbiel, P. R., Hamlin, T., and Harlin, J.: A GPS-based three-dimensional lightning mapping system: Initial observations in central New Mexico, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3573, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010856" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL010856</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Rodriguez et al.(2025)Rodriguez, van der Velde, Fabró, Pineda, Balagué, and Montanyà</label><mixed-citation>Rodriguez, O., van der Velde, O., Fabró, F., Pineda, N., Balagué, M., and Montanyà, J.: Severe storm signatures in three-dimensional lightning data (LMA): isolated lightning on the overshooting cloud tops, Tech. rep., Copernicus Meetings, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ecss2025-109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ecss2025-109</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Roncancio et al.(2025)Roncancio, Montanyà, López, Urbani, and van der Velde</label><mixed-citation>Roncancio, J., Montanyà, J., López, J., Urbani, M., and van der Velde, O.: Investigation of GLM detections of negative continuing currents observed by high-speed video and narrow-band 777 nm photometer, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 239, 111250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2024.111250" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsr.2024.111250</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>San Segundo et al.(2020)San Segundo, López, Pineda, Altube, and Montanya</label><mixed-citation>San Segundo, H., López, J. A., Pineda, N., Altube, P., and Montanya, J.: Sensitivity analysis of lightning stroke-to-flash grouping criteria, Atmos. Res., 242, 105023, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105023</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Schulz et al.(2005)Schulz, Cummins, Diendorfer, and Dorninger</label><mixed-citation>Schulz, W., Cummins, K., Diendorfer, G., and Dorninger, M.: Cloud-to-ground lightning in Austria: A 10-year study using data from a lightning location system, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005332" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005332</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Schulz et al.(2016)Schulz, Diendorfer, Pedeboy, and Poelman</label><mixed-citation>Schulz, W., Diendorfer, G., Pedeboy, S., and Poelman, D. R.: The European lightning location system EUCLID – Part 1: Performance analysis and validation, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 595–605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-595-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-16-595-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Schumann and Huntrieser(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Seiler et al.(2025)Seiler, Pickering, Allen, Bucsela, and Huntrieser</label><mixed-citation>Seiler, M., Pickering, K., Allen, D., Bucsela, E., and Huntrieser, H.: Evaluation of satellite-based lightning NOx columns using in-cloud aircraft measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD043253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD043253" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD043253</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Skamarock et al.(2003)Skamarock, Dye, Defer, Barth, Stith, Ridley, and Baumann</label><mixed-citation>Skamarock, W. C., Dye, J. E., Defer, E., Barth, M., Stith, J. L., Ridley, B. A., and Baumann, K.: Observational- and modeling-based budget of lightning-produced NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in a continental thunderstorm, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002163" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002163</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Skamarock et al.(2019)Skamarock, Klemp, Dudhia, Gill, Liu, Berner, Wang, Powers, Duda, Barker et al.</label><mixed-citation>Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Wang, W., Powers, J. G., Duda, M. G., Barker, D. M., Duda, M. G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the advanced research WRF version 4, NCAR tech. note ncar/tn-556+ str, 145, <uri>http://pfigshare-u-files.s3.amazonaws.com/14057147/WRF_TechNote_Jan2019.pdf</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026),  2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Stark et al.(1996)Stark, Harrison, and Anastasi</label><mixed-citation>Stark, M., Harrison, J., and Anastasi, C.: Formation of nitrogen oxides by electrical discharges and implications for atmospheric lightning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 6963–6969, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD03008</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Stith et al.(1999)Stith, Dye, Ridley, Laroche, Defer, Baumann, Hübler, Zerr, and Venticinque</label><mixed-citation>Stith, J., Dye, J., Ridley, B., Laroche, P., Defer, E., Baumann, K., Hübler, G., Zerr, R., and Venticinque, M.: NO signatures from lightning flashes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 16081–16089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900174</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Tost et al.(2007)Tost, Jöckel, and Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Lightning and convection parameterisations – uncertainties in global modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4553–4568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4553-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4553-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Van Der Velde et al.(2023)Van Der Velde, Montanya, López, Romero, and Pineda</label><mixed-citation>Van Der Velde, O., Montanya, J., López, J. A., Romero, D., and Pineda, N.: eLMA: The 2023 Upgrade of the Ebro 3D Lightning Mapping Array and UV-Intensified High-Speed Camera System, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2023,  AE11B–2419, <uri>https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AGUFMAE11B2419V/abstract</uri> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>van der Velde et al.(2024)van der Velde, Romero, López, Montanyà, Pineda, and Fabró</label><mixed-citation>van der Velde, O., Romero, D., López, J., Montanyà, J., Pineda, N., and Fabró, F.: New visualization and analysis tools for 3D Lightning Mapping Array data, EMS Annual Meeting 2024, Barcelona, Spain, 1–6 Sep 2024, EMS2024-978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2024-978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ems2024-978</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>van der Velde and Montanyà(2013)</label><mixed-citation>van der Velde, O. A. and Montanyà, J.: Asymmetries in bidirectional leader development of lightning flashes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 13–504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020257</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Van Geffen et al.(2022)Van Geffen, Eskes, Compernolle, Pinardi, Verhoelst, Lambert, Sneep, Ter Linden, Ludewig, Boersma et al.</label><mixed-citation>van Geffen, J., Eskes, H., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Verhoelst, T., Lambert, J.-C., Sneep, M., ter Linden, M., Ludewig, A., Boersma, K. F., and Veefkind, J. P.: Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO2 retrieval: impact of version v2.2 improvements and comparisons with OMI and ground-based data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2037–2060, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2037-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-2037-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Veefkind et al.(2012)Veefkind, Aben, McMullan, Förster, De Vries, Otter, Claas, Eskes, De Haan, Kleipool et al.</label><mixed-citation>Veefkind, J., Aben, I., McMullan, K., Förster, H., De Vries, J., Otter, G., Claas, J., Eskes, H., De Haan, J., Kleipool, Q., van Weele, M., Hasekamp, O., Hoogeveen, R., Landgraf, J., Snel, R., Tol, P., Ingmann, P., Voors, R., Kruizinga, B., Vink, R., Visser, H., and Levelt, P. F.: TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 70–83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.027</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Visualization &amp; Analysis Systems Technologies(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Visualization &amp; Analysis Systems Technologies: Geoscience Community Analysis Toolkit: WRF-Python, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6W094P1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6W094P1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Wang et al.(2025)Wang, Zhang, Bozóki, Liang, Xie, Zhao, Wang, Zhao, and Sun</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Bozóki, T., Liang, R., Xie, X., Zhao, S., Wang, R., Zhao, Y., and Sun, S.: Contributions of lightning to long-term trends and inter-annual variability in global atmospheric chemistry constrained by Schumann resonance observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8929–8942, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8929-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-8929-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Wang et al.(1998)Wang, DeSilva, Goldenbaum, and Dickerson</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., DeSilva, A., Goldenbaum, G., and Dickerson, R.: Nitric oxide production by simulated lightning: Dependence on current, energy, and pressure, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 19149–19159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD01356</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Wemhoner et al.(2025)Wemhoner, da Silva, Leal, Bandara, Pantuso, and Sonnenfeld</label><mixed-citation>Wemhoner, J., da Silva, C. L., Leal, A. F., Bandara, S., Pantuso, J. G., and Sonnenfeld, R. G.: Near-infrared atomic oxygen photometry of lightning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042256" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD042256</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Wiedinmyer et al.(2011)Wiedinmyer, Akagi, Yokelson, Emmons, Al-Saadi, Orlando, and Soja</label><mixed-citation>Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J. A., Orlando, J. J., and Soja, A. J.: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011</ext-link>, 2011. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>World Meteorological Organization(1957)</label><mixed-citation>World Meteorological Organization: Meteorology – A Three-Dimensional Science: Second Session of the Commission for Aerology, Tech. Rep. WMO Technical Note No. 8, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, <uri>https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&amp;id=1260</uri> (last access: 6 July 2026), 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Wu et al.(2007)Wu, Mickley, Jacob, Logan, Yantosca, and Rind</label><mixed-citation>Wu, S., Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Yantosca, R. M., and Rind, D.: Why are there large differences between models in global budgets of tropospheric ozone?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007801" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007801</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Zel'dovich(1946)Zeldovich, Frank-Kamenetskii, and Sadovnikov</label><mixed-citation> Zel'dovich, Y. B.: The Oxidation of Nitrogen in Combustion Explosions, Acta Physicochimica U.S.S.R., 21, 577–628, 1946.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx119"><label>Zhang et al.(2022)Zhang, Yin, van der A, Eskes, van Geffen, Li, Kuang, Lapierre, Chen, Zhen et al.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Yin, Y., van der A, R., Eskes, H., van Geffen, J., Li, Y., Kuang, X., Lapierre, J. L., Chen, K., Zhen, Z., Hu, J., He, C., Chen, J., Shi, R., Zhang, J., Ye, X., and Chen, H.: Influence of convection on the upper-tropospheric O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> budget in southeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5925–5942, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5925-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-5925-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx120"><label>Zoogman et al.(2017)Zoogman, Liu, Suleiman, Pennington, Flittner, Al-Saadi, Hilton, Nicks, Newchurch, Carr et al.</label><mixed-citation>Zoogman, P., Liu, X., Suleiman, R., et al.: Tropospheric emissions: Monitoring of pollution (TEMPO), J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 186, 17–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Characterizing lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> production in the Ebro Valley with meteosat 12 LI and LMA observations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Allen et al.(2021a)Allen, Pickering, Bucsela,
Van Geffen, Lapierre, Koshak, and Eskes</label><mixed-citation>
      
Allen, D., Pickering, K. E., Bucsela, E., Van Geffen, J., Lapierre, J., Koshak,
W., and Eskes, H.: Observations of Lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Production From
Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument Case Studies Over the United States, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD034174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034174</a>,
2021a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Allen and Pickering(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Allen, D. J. and Pickering, K. E.: Evaluation of lightning flash rate
parameterizations for use in a global chemical transport model, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002066</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Allen et al.(2019)Allen, Pickering, Bucsela, Krotkov, and
Holzworth</label><mixed-citation>
      
Allen, D. J., Pickering, K. E., Bucsela, E., Krotkov, N., and Holzworth, R.:
Lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> production in the tropics as determined using OMI NO<sub>2</sub>
retrievals and WWLLN stroke data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124,
13498–13518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029824" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029824</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Allen et al.(2021b)Allen, Pickering, Lamsal, Mach,
Quick, Lapierre, Janz, Koshak, Kowalewski, and
Blakeslee</label><mixed-citation>
      
Allen, D. J., Pickering, K. E., Lamsal, L., Mach, D. M., Quick, M. G.,
Lapierre, J., Janz, S., Koshak, W., Kowalewski, M., and Blakeslee, R.:
Observations of Lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Production From GOES R Post Launch Test
Field Campaign Flights, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e33769,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033769" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033769</a>, 2021b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Barth et al.(2015)Barth, Cantrell, Brune, Rutledge, Crawford,
Huntrieser, Carey, MacGorman, Weisman, Pickering et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barth, M. C., Cantrell, C. A., Brune, W. H., et al.: The deep convective clouds and chemistry (DC3) field campaign,
B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 96, 1281–1309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Beirle et al.(2009)Beirle, Salzmann, Lawrence, and
Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beirle, S., Salzmann, M., Lawrence, M. G., and Wagner, T.: Sensitivity of satellite observations for freshly produced lightning NOx, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1077–1094, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1077-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1077-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Beirle et al.(2010)Beirle, Huntrieser, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beirle, S., Huntrieser, H., and Wagner, T.: Direct satellite observation of lightning-produced NOx, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10965–10986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10965-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10965-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bitzer(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bitzer, P. M.: Global distribution and properties of continuing current in
lightning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 1033–1041, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bližňák and Sokol(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bližňák, V. and Sokol, Z.: First validation of the Lightning
Imager aboard Meteosat Third Generation satellite with Earth Networks Total
Lightning Network, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 147, 105205,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105205</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Boccippio et al.(2001)Boccippio, Cummins, Christian, and
Goodman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boccippio, D. J., Cummins, K. L., Christian, H. J., and Goodman, S. J.:
Combined satellite-and surface-based estimation of the
intracloud–cloud-to-ground lightning ratio over the continental United
States, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 108–122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129&lt;0108:CSASBE&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129&lt;0108:CSASBE&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Bozóki et al.(2025)Bozóki, Mlynarczyk, Prácser, Kulak,
Sátori, Füllekrug, and Williams</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bozóki, T., Mlynarczyk, J., Prácser, E., Kulak, A., Sátori, G.,
Füllekrug, M., and Williams, E.: Modeling the global electromagnetic
resonance field produced by lightning discharges with a continuing current,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2025JD043989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043989" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043989</a>,
2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Brasseur et al.(1998)Brasseur, Hauglustaine, Walters, Rasch,
Müller, Granier, and Tie</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brasseur, G. P., Hauglustaine, D., Walters, S., Rasch, P., Müller, J.-F.,
Granier, C., and Tie, X.: MOZART, a global chemical transport model for ozone
and related chemical tracers: 1. Model description, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
103, 28265–28289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02397" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02397</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Bruning and MacGorman(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bruning, E. C. and MacGorman, D. R.: Theory and observations of controls on
lightning flash size spectra, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 4012–4029,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0289.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0289.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Bruning and Thomas(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bruning, E. C. and Thomas, R. J.: Lightning channel length and flash energy
determined from moments of the flash area distribution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8925–8940, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023766" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023766</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Buchholz et al.(2019)Buchholz, Emmons, Tilmes, and
Team</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buchholz, R., Emmons, L., Tilmes, S., and Team, T.: CESM2. 1/CAM-chem
instantaneous output for boundary conditions, UCAR/NCAR-Atmospheric
chemistry observations and modeling Laboratory [data set], 10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/NMP7-EP60" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/NMP7-EP60</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Bucsela et al.(2013)Bucsela, Krotkov, Celarier, Lamsal, Swartz,
Bhartia, Boersma, Veefkind, Gleason, and Pickering</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bucsela, E. J., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Lamsal, L. N., Swartz, W. H., Bhartia, P. K., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Gleason, J. F., and Pickering, K. E.: A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments: applications to OMI, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2607–2626, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Bucsela et al.(2021)Bucsela, Pickering, Allen, Loyola,
Eskes, Veefkind, van Geffen, Koshak, and Krotkov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bucsela, E., Pickering, K., Allen, D., Loyola, D., Eskes, H.,
Veefkind, P., van Geffen, J., Koshak, W., and Krotkov, N.: Improved
Lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Production Estimates Using TROPOMI and GLM Data, AGU Fall
Meeting 2021,  New Orleans, LA, 13–17 December 2021,  A24E–07,
<a href="https://studio.m-anage.com/agu/fm21/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/983228" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Bucsela et al.(2019)Bucsela, Pickering, Allen, Holzworth, and
Krotkov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bucsela, E. J., Pickering, K. E., Allen, D. J., Holzworth, R. H., and Krotkov,
N. A.: Midlatitude lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> production efficiency inferred from OMI
and WWLLN data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 13475–13497,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030561</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Camino-Faillace et al.(2026)Camino-Faillace, Gordillo-Vázquez,
Pérez-Invernón, Montanyà, Młynarczyk, Neubert, Chanrion, and
Østgaard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Camino-Faillace, P. A., Gordillo-Vázquez, F., Pérez-Invernón,
F. J., Montanyà, J., Młynarczyk, J., Neubert, T., Chanrion, O., and
Østgaard, N.: Optical and radio characterization of continuing current
lightning with ASIM, GLM and ELF sensors, Atmos. Res.,  108578,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108578" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108578</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Chin et al.(2000)Chin, Rood, Lin, Müller, and
Thompson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chin, M., Rood, R. B., Lin, S.-J., Müller, J.-F., and Thompson, A. M.:
Atmospheric sulfur cycle simulated in the global model GOCART: Model
description and global properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105,
24671–24687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900384" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900384</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Chou and Suarez(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: A solar radiation parameterization for
atmospheric studies, Tech. rep., NASA Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA/TM-1999-104606, Vol. 15, <a href="https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19990060930" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Chronis et al.(2015)Chronis, Lang, Koshak, Blakeslee, Christian,
McCaul, and Bailey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chronis, T., Lang, T., Koshak, W., Blakeslee, R., Christian, H., McCaul, E.,
and Bailey, J.: Diurnal characteristics of lightning flashes detected over
the São Paulo lightning mapping array, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
11–799, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023960" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023960</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Cummins and Murphy(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cummins, K. L. and Murphy, M. J.: An overview of lightning locating systems:
History, techniques, and data uses, with an in-depth look at the US NLDN,
IEEE T. Electromagn. C., 51, 499–518, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Cummins et al.(1998)Cummins, Murphy, Bardo, Hiscox, Pyle,
and Pifer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cummins, K. L., Murphy, M. J., Bardo, E. A., Hiscox, W. L., Pyle,
R. B., and Pifer, A. E.: A combined TOA/MDF technology upgrade of the U.S.
National Lightning Detection Network, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 9035,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00153</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Dahlmann et al.(2011)Dahlmann, Grewe, Ponater, and
Matthes</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dahlmann, K., Grewe, V., Ponater, M., and Matthes, S.: Quantifying the
contributions of individual NOx sources to the trend in ozone radiative
forcing, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2860–2868,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.071</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Dang et al.(2026)Dang, Jacob, He, Clifton, Li, and
Liao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dang, R., Jacob, D. J., He, M., Clifton, O. E., Li, K., and Liao, H.: Lightning
Source of Nitrogen Oxides (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>) Inferred From Geostationary Satellites:
Global Implications for Oxidant Chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 53,
e2026GL124557, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2026GL124557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2026GL124557</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Ding et al.(2024)Ding, Zhu, Lapierre, DiGangi, Ringhausen, Lauria,
Saba, Rakov, Abbasi, da Silva et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, Z., Zhu, Y., Lapierre, J., DiGangi, E., Ringhausen, J., Lauria, P. B.,
Saba, M. M., Rakov, V. A., Abbasi, R. U., da Silva, D. R., and da Silva, T. P.: Continuing
current seen above and below the cloud: Comparing observations from GLM and
high-speed video cameras, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2024GL110099,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110099" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110099</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Dobber and Grandell(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dobber, M. and Grandell, J.: Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Lightning
Imager (LI) instrument performance and calibration from user perspective,
in: The Characterization and Radiometric Calibration for Remote Sensing Annual Meeting (CALCON 2014), Logan, UT, USA, <a href="https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/calcon/CALCON2014/All2014Content/13/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Ek et al.(2003)Ek, Mitchell, Lin, Rogers, Grunmann, Koren, Gayno, and
Tarpley</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ek, M., Mitchell, K., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V., Gayno, G.,
and Tarpley, J.: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the
National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta
model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Enno et al.(2025)Enno, Viticchie, Navia, and Grandell</label><mixed-citation>
      
Enno, S.-E., Viticchie, B., Navia, D., and Grandell, J.: Meteosat-12 Lightning Imager: first year of observations and the main performance characteristics, 12th European Conference on Severe Storms, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 17–21 Nov 2025, ECSS2025-152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ecss2025-152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ecss2025-152</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>EUMETSAT(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
EUMETSAT: LI Lightning Flashes – MTG – 0 degree (Version 1.0),
<a href="https://data.eumetsat.int/product/EO:EUM:DAT:0691" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026),
2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>EUMETSAT(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
EUMETSAT: LI Lightning Flashes – MTG – 0 degree (Version 1.0),
<a href="https://data.eumetsat.int/product/EO:EUM:DAT:0782" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026),
2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Fairman and Bitzer(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fairman, S. I. and Bitzer, P. M.: The detection of continuing current in
lightning using the geostationary lightning mapper, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
127, e2020JD033451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033451</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Fehr et al.(2004)Fehr, Höller, and Huntrieser</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fehr, T., Höller, H., and Huntrieser, H.: Model study on production and
transport of lightning-produced NOx in a EULINOX supercell storm, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003935" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003935</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Fierro et al.(2012)Fierro, Mansell, Ziegler, and
MacGorman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fierro, A. O., Mansell, E. R., Ziegler, C. L., and MacGorman, D. R.:
Application of a lightning data assimilation technique in the WRF-ARW model
at cloud-resolving scales for the tornado outbreak of 24 May 2011, Mon.
Weather Rev., 140, 2609–2627, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00299.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00299.1</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Fuchs et al.(2016)Fuchs, Bruning, Rutledge, Carey, Krehbiel, and
Rison</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fuchs, B. R., Bruning, E. C., Rutledge, S. A., Carey, L. D., Krehbiel, P. R.,
and Rison, W.: Climatological analyses of LMA data with an open-source
lightning flash-clustering algorithm, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121,
8625–8648, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024663" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024663</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Gedik et al.(2025)Gedik, Mansouri, Kohlmann, Schulz, and
Rubinstein</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gedik, E., Mansouri, E., Kohlmann, H., Schulz, W., and Rubinstein, M.:
Performance Evaluation of Meteosat Third Generation Lightning Imager in
Detecting Lightning Discharges, in: 2025 International Symposium on Lightning
Protection (XVIII SIPDA), IEEE,  1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/SIPDA68639.2025.11296657" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/SIPDA68639.2025.11296657</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Gordillo-Vázquez et al.(2019)Gordillo-Vázquez, Pérez-Invernón,
Huntrieser, and Smith</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Huntrieser, H., and Smith,
A. K.: Comparison of Six Lightning Parameterizations in CAM5 and the Impact
on Global Atmospheric Chemistry, Earth Space Sci., 6, 2317–2346,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000873" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000873</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Grell and Dévényi(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grell, G. A. and Dévényi, D.: A generalized approach to parameterizing
convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 38-1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Grell et al.(2005)Grell, Peckham, Schmitz, McKeen, Frost, Skamarock,
and Eder</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G., Skamarock,
W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF
model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027</a>,
2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Guenther et al.(2012)Guenther, Jiang, Heald, Sakulyanontvittaya,
Duhl, Emmons, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Holmlund et al.(2021)Holmlund, Grandell, Schmetz, Stuhlmann, Bojkov,
Munro, Lekouara, Coppens, Viticchie, August et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Holmlund, K., Grandell, J., Schmetz, J., Stuhlmann, R., Bojkov, B., Munro, R.,
Lekouara, M., Coppens, D., Viticchie, B., August, T., Theodore, B., Watts, P., Dobber, M., Fowler, G., Bojinski, S., Schmid, A., Salonen, K., Tjemkes, S., Aminou, D., and Blythe, P.: Meteosat
Third Generation (MTG): Continuation and innovation of observations
from geostationary orbit, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 102, E990–E1015,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Hong and Lim(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hong, S.-Y. and Lim, J.-O. J.: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics
scheme (WSM6), Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 129–151,
2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Hu et al.(2013)Hu, Klein, and Xue</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, X.-M., Klein, P. M., and Xue, M.: Evaluation of the updated YSU planetary
boundary layer scheme within WRF for wind resource and air quality
assessments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 10–490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50823" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50823</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Huntrieser et al.(2002)Huntrieser, Feigl, Schlager, Schröder,
Gerbig, Van Velthoven, Flatøy, Théry, Petzold, Höller
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huntrieser, H., Feigl, C., Schlager, H., Schröder, F., Gerbig, C.,
Van Velthoven, P., Flatøy, F., Théry, C., Petzold, A., Höller, H.,
and Schumann, U.: Airborne measurements of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, tracer species, and small
particles during the European Lightning Nitrogen Oxides Experiment,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000209</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Huntrieser et al.(2008)Huntrieser, Schumann, Schlager, Höller,
Giez, Betz, Brunner, Forster, Pinto Jr, and
Calheiros</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huntrieser, H., Schumann, U., Schlager, H., Höller, H., Giez, A., Betz, H.-D., Brunner, D., Forster, C., Pinto Jr., O., and Calheiros, R.: Lightning activity in Brazilian thunderstorms during TROCCINOX: implications for NOx production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 921–953, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-921-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-921-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>International Electrotechnical Commission(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
International Electrotechnical Commission: Lightning density – Methods for
calculation using lightning location systems (LLS),
<a href="https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/102016/9d0f88cdd88140a7859de60428d43d74/IEC-62858-2019.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026),
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Janjić(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janjić, Z. I.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments
of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes, Mon.
Weather Rev., 122, 927–945,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122&lt;0927:TSMECM&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122&lt;0927:TSMECM&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Janssens-Maenhout et al.(2015)Janssens-Maenhout, Crippa, Guizzardi,
Dentener, Muntean, Pouliot, Keating, Zhang, Kurokawa, Wankmüller
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janssens-Maenhout, G., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Dentener, F., Muntean, M., Pouliot, G., Keating, T., Zhang, Q., Kurokawa, J., Wankmüller, R., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J. J. P., Klimont, Z., Frost, G., Darras, S., Koffi, B., and Li, M.: HTAP_v2.2: a mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11411–11432, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Jenkins et al.(2021)Jenkins, Brune, and
Miller</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jenkins, J. M., Brune, W. H., and Miller, D. O.: Electrical discharges produce
prodigious amounts of hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl radicals, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034557, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034557</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Jöckel et al.(2016)Jöckel, Tost, Pozzer, Kunze, Kirner,
Brenninkmeijer, Brinkop, Cai, Dyroff, Eckstein et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F., Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B., Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S., Neumaier, M., Nützel, M., Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R., Scharffe, D., and Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1153–1200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Lapierre et al.(2020)Lapierre, Laughner, Geddes, Koshak, Cohen, and
Pusede</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lapierre, J. L., Laughner, J. L., Geddes, J. A., Koshak, W. J., Cohen, R. C.,
and Pusede, S. E.: Observing US regional variability in lightning NO<sub>2</sub>
production rates, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031362,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031362" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031362</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Laughner and Cohen(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laughner, J. L. and Cohen, R. C.: Quantification of the effect of modeled lightning NO<sub>2</sub> on UV–visible air mass factors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4403–4419, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4403-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4403-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Lindfors et al.(2018)Lindfors, Kujanpää, Kalakoski,
Heikkilä, Lakkala, Mielonen, Sneep, Krotkov, Arola, and
Tamminen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lindfors, A. V., Kujanpää, J., Kalakoski, N., Heikkilä, A., Lakkala, K., Mielonen, T., Sneep, M., Krotkov, N. A., Arola, A., and Tamminen, J.: The TROPOMI surface UV algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 997–1008, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-997-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-997-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Liu et al.(2021)Liu, Valks, Pinardi, Xu, Chan, Argyrouli, Lutz,
Beirle, Khorsandi, Baier et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, S., Valks, P., Pinardi, G., Xu, J., Chan, K. L., Argyrouli, A., Lutz, R., Beirle, S., Khorsandi, E., Baier, F., Huijnen, V., Bais, A., Donner, S., Dörner, S., Gratsea, M., Hendrick, F., Karagkiozidis, D., Lange, K., Piters, A. J. M., Remmers, J., Richter, A., Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., Wenig, M., and Loyola, D. G.: An improved TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 research product over Europe, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7297–7327, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7297-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7297-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Loyola et al.(2018)Loyola, Gimeno García, Lutz, Argyrouli,
Romahn, Spurr, Pedergnana, Doicu, Molina García, and
Schüssler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Loyola, D. G., Gimeno García, S., Lutz, R., Argyrouli, A., Romahn, F., Spurr, R. J. D., Pedergnana, M., Doicu, A., Molina García, V., and Schüssler, O.: The operational cloud retrieval algorithms from TROPOMI on board Sentinel-5 Precursor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 409–427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-409-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-409-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Luhar et al.(2021)Luhar, Galbally, Woodhouse, and
Abraham</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luhar, A. K., Galbally, I. E., Woodhouse, M. T., and Abraham, N. L.: Assessing and improving cloud-height-based parameterisations of global lightning flash rate, and their impact on lightning-produced NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and tropospheric composition in a chemistry–climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7053–7082, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7053-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7053-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Luque et al.(2020)Luque, Gordillo-Vázquez, Li,
Malagón-Romero, Pérez-Invernón, Schmalzried, Soler, Chanrion,
Heumesser, Neubert et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luque, A., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., Li, D., Malagón-Romero, A., Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Schmalzried, A., Soler, S., Chanrion, O., Heumesser, M., Neubert, T., Reglero, V., and Østgaard, N.: Modeling lightning observations from space-based platforms (CloudScat.jl 1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5549–5566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5549-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5549-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Marchenko et al.(2025)Marchenko, Carr, Chong, Houck, Liu, Flittner,
Joiner, Baker, Lasnik, and Nicks</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marchenko, S. V., Carr, J. L., Chong, H., Houck, J. C., Liu, X., Flittner,
D. E., Joiner, J., Baker, B. D., Lasnik, J. K., and Nicks, D. K.: TEMPO at
night: Lightning flashes and on-orbit instrument performance, Earth Space
Sci., 12, e2025EA004513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EA004513" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EA004513</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Mlawer et al.(1997)Mlawer, Taubman, Brown, Iacono, and
Clough</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S. A.:
Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated
correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102,
16663–16682, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Montanyà et al.(2006)Montanyà, Pineda, March, Illa, Romero,
and Solà</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montanyà, J., Pineda, N., March, V., Illa, A., Romero, D., and Solà,
G.: Experimental evaluation of the Catalan lightning detection network, in:
19th international lightning detection conference, Tucson, <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nicolau-Pineda/publication/255570445_EXPERIMENTAL_EVALUATION_OF_THE_CATALAN_LIGHTNING_DETECTION_NETWORK/links/53f602e40cf22be01c3ff388/EXPERIMENTAL-EVALUATION-OF-THE-CATALAN-LIGHTNING-DETECTION-NETWORK.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nicolau-Pineda/publication/255570445</a> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Montanyà et al.(2012)Montanyà, Van der Velde, March, Romero,
Solà, and Pineda</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montanyà, J., Van der Velde, O. A., March, V., Romero, D., Solà, G.,
and Pineda, N.: High-speed video of lightning and X-ray pulses during the
2009–2010 observation campaigns in northeastern Spain, Atmos. Res., 117,
91–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.09.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.09.013</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Montanyà et al.(2014)Montanyà, van der Velde, Solà,
Fabró, Romero, Pineda, and Argemí</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montanyà, J., van der Velde, O., Solà, G., Fabró, F., Romero, D.,
Pineda, N., and Argemí, O.: Lightning flash properties derived from
Lightning Mapping Array data, in: 2014 International Conference on Lightning
Protection (ICLP), IEEE, 974–978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP.2014.6973264" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP.2014.6973264</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Montanyà et al.(2021)Montanyà, López, Morales Rodriguez,
van der Velde, Fabró, Pineda, Navarro-González, Reglero, Neubert,
Chanrion et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montanyà, J., López, J. A., Morales Rodriguez, C. A., van der Velde,
O. A., Fabró, F., Pineda, N., Navarro-González, J., Reglero, V.,
Neubert, T., Chanrion, O., Goodman, S. J., Østgaard, N., Ladino-Rincon, A., Romero, D., Solà, G., Horta, R., and Freijó, M.: A Simultaneous Observation of Lightning by
ASIM, Colombia-Lightning Mapping Array, GLM, and ISS-LIS, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033735</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Montanya et al.(2024)Montanya, Van Der Velde, López Trujillo,
Pineda, Romero, Sola, Defer, Soula, Bruning, Viticchiè
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montanya, J., Van Der Velde, O., López Trujillo, J. A., Pineda, N., Romero,
D., Sola, G., Defer, E., Soula, S., Bruning, E. C., Viticchiè, B.,
Enno, S.-E., Grandell, J., Gordillo-Vazquez, F. J., Perez-Invernon, F. J., Neubert, T., Chanrion, O., Ostgaard, N., and Victor, R.: MTG Lightning Imager performance during the first
days of public data with the Ebro Lightning Mapping Array and the ASIM
instrument on the ISS, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts,  2024,
AE32A–01, <a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AGUFMAE32A..01M/abstract" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Murphy and Nag(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murphy, M. J. and Nag, A.: Cloud lightning performance and climatology of the
US based on the upgraded US National Lightning Detection Network, in:
Seventh Conf. on the Meteorological Applications of Lightning Data, <a href="https://ams.confex.com/ams/95Annual/webprogram/Manuscript/Paper262391/AMS2015_MALD_8.2_murphy.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Murray et al.(2012)Murray, Jacob, Logan, Hudman, and
Koshak</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murray, L. T., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Hudman, R. C., and Koshak, W. J.:
Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global
chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017934</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>National Center for Atmospheric Research
(NCAR)(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR): WRF-Chem, Atmospheric Chemistry Observations &amp; Modeling, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, <a href="https://www2.acom.ucar.edu/wrf-chem" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026),
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>National Center for Atmospheric Research
(NCAR)(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR): Whole Atmosphere Community
Climate Model (WACCM) Model Output, [data set],
d313006, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/G643-Z138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/G643-Z138</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>National Centers for Environmental
Prediction(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
National Centers for Environmental Prediction: NCEP GDAS/FNL 0.25 Degree
Global Tropospheric Analyses and Forecast Grids, dataset: ds083.3, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D65Q4T4Z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D65Q4T4Z</a>,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: NCEP FNL Operational Model Global Tropospheric Analyses, continuing from July 1999, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Nault et al.(2017)Nault, Laughner, Wooldridge, Crounse,
Dibb, Diskin, Peischl, Podolske, Pollack, Ryerson, Scheuer,
Wennberg, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nault, B. A., Laughner, J. L., Wooldridge, P. J., Crounse, J. D.,
Dibb, J., Diskin, G., Peischl, J., Podolske, J. R., Pollack, I. B.,
Ryerson, T. B., Scheuer, E., Wennberg, P. O., and Cohen, R. C.:
Lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Emissions: Reconciling Measured and Modeled Estimates
With Updated NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 9479–9488,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074436" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074436</a>, 2017GL074436, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Noh et al.(2003)Noh, Cheon, Hong, and Raasch</label><mixed-citation>
      
Noh, Y., Cheon, W., Hong, S., and Raasch, S.: Improvement of the K-profile
model for the planetary boundary layer based on large eddy simulation data,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 107, 401–427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022146015946" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022146015946</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Ott et al.(2010)Ott, Pickering, Stenchikov, Allen, DeCaria, Ridley,
Lin, Lang, and Tao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ott, L. E., Pickering, K. E., Stenchikov, G. L., Allen, D. J., DeCaria, A. J.,
Ridley, B., Lin, R.-F., Lang, S., and Tao, W.-K.: Production of lightning NOx
and its vertical distribution calculated from three-dimensional cloud-scale
chemical transport model simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011880</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Pérez-Invernón(2026a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Invernón, F. J.: High-resolution atmospheric simulations using
a modified WRF-Chem v4.3: Lightning effects on air quality in the Ebro Valley
– Lightning nudging towards MTG-LI, Zenodo [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20065621" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20065621</a>, 2026a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Pérez-Invernón(2026b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Invernón, F. J.: High-resolution atmospheric simulations using
a modified WRF-Chem v4.3: Lightning effects on air quality in the Ebro Valley
– Lightning nudging towards MTG-LI scaled to XCALMA, Zenodo [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19588416" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19588416</a>, 2026b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Pérez-Invernón et al.(2022)Pérez-Invernón,
Huntrieser, Erbertseder, Loyola, Valks, Liu, Allen, Pickering, Bucsela,
Jöckel et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Huntrieser, H., Erbertseder, T., Loyola, D., Valks, P., Liu, S., Allen, D. J., Pickering, K. E., Bucsela, E. J., Jöckel, P., van Geffen, J., Eskes, H., Soler, S., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., and Lapierre, J.: Quantification of lightning-produced NOx over the Pyrenees and the Ebro Valley by using different TROPOMI-NO2 and cloud research products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3329–3351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3329-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3329-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Pérez-Invernón
et al.(2023a)Pérez-Invernón, Gordillo-Vázquez,
Huntrieser, and Jöckel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., Huntrieser, H., and
Jöckel, P.: Variation of lightning-ignited wildfire patterns under
climate change, Nat. Commun., 14, 739, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36500-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36500-5</a>,
2023a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Pérez-Invernón
et al.(2023b)Pérez-Invernón, Gordillo-Vázquez,
van der Velde, Montanyá, López Trujillo, Pineda, Huntrieser, Valks,
Loyola, Seo et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., van der Velde, O.,
Montanyá, J., López Trujillo, J. A., Pineda, N., Huntrieser, H.,
Valks, P., Loyola, D., Seo, S., and Erbertseder, T.: Lightning-Produced Nitrogen Oxides
Per Flash Length Obtained by Using TROPOMI Observations and the Ebro
Lightning Mapping Array, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL104699,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104699" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104699</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Pérez-Invernón
et al.(2025a)Pérez-Invernón, Gordillo-Vázquez,
Huntrieser, Jöckel, and Bucsela</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J., Huntrieser, H., Jöckel, P., and Bucsela, E. J.: Sensitivity of climate–chemistry model simulated atmospheric composition to the application of an inverse relationship between NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission and lightning flash frequency, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5557–5575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5557-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5557-2025</a>,
2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Pérez-Invernón
et al.(2025b)Pérez-Invernón, Ripoll,
Gordillo-Vázquez, Luque, Camino-Faillace, Li, Neubert, Chanrion, and
Østgaard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Invernón, F. J., Ripoll, J.-F., Gordillo-Vázquez, F. J.,
Luque, A., Camino-Faillace, P. A., Li, D., Neubert, T., Chanrion, O., and
Østgaard, N.: A comprehensive analysis of optical emissions, production of
NOx, HOx, and other chemical species by lightning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
130, e2025JD043972, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043972" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043972</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Pickering et al.(1998)Pickering, Wang, Tao, Price, and
Müller</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pickering, K. E., Wang, Y., Tao, W.-K., Price, C., and Müller, J.-F.:
Vertical distributions of lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> for use in regional and global
chemical transport models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 31203–31216,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02651" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02651</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Pickering et al.(2016)Pickering, Bucsela, Allen, Ring, Holzworth, and
Krotkov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pickering, K. E., Bucsela, E., Allen, D., Ring, A., Holzworth, R., and Krotkov,
N.: Estimates of lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> production based on OMI NO<sub>2</sub>
observations over the Gulf of Mexico, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121,
8668–8691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024179" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024179</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Pickering et al.(2024)Pickering, Li, Cummings, Barth, Allen, Bruning,
and Pollack</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pickering, K. E., Li, Y., Cummings, K. A., Barth, M. C., Allen, D. J., Bruning,
E. C., and Pollack, I. B.: Lightning NOx in the 29–30 May 2012 Deep
Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Severe Storm and Its Downwind Chemical
Consequences, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD039439,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039439</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Pickering et al.(2026)Pickering, Allen, and
Huntrieser</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pickering, K. E., Allen, D. J., and Huntrieser, H.: The role of lightning in
atmospheric chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 131, e2026JD046484,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2026JD046484" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2026JD046484</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Pineda and Montanyà(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pineda, N. and Montanyà, J.: Lightning detection in Spain: the particular
case of Catalonia, Lightning: Principles, Instruments and Applications:
Review of Modern Lightning Research,  161–185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9079-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9079-0</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Pineda et al.(2010)Pineda, Esteban, Trapero, Soler, and
Beck</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pineda, N., Esteban, P., Trapero, L., Soler, X., and Beck, C.: Circulation
types related to lightning activity over Catalonia and the Principality
of Andorra, Phys. Chem. Earth,  35, 469–476,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.009</a>,  2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Pineda et al.(2025)Pineda, Balagué, Fabró, Montanyà,
van der Velde, Rodríguez, López, and Romero</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pineda, N., Balagué, M., Fabró, F., Montanyà, J., van der Velde,
O., Rodríguez, O., López, J. A., and Romero, D.: Validation of the
MTG-LI with a Lightning Mapping Array (LMA): Evaluating Flash Rates
within Intense Convective Storms, in: Proceedings of the 2025 EUMETSAT
Meteorological Satellite Conference, Lyon, France, <a href="https://program-eumetsat2025.kuoni-congress.info/presentation/validation-of-the-mtg-lightning-imager-with-a-lightning-mapping-array-evaluating-flash-rates-within-intense-convective-storms" target="_blank">https://program-eumetsat2025.kuoni-congress.info/presentation/</a> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Price et al.(1997)Price, Penner, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>
      
Price, C., Penner, J., and Prather, M.: NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> from lightning: 1.
Global distribution based on lightning physics, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 5929,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03504" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03504</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Rahman et al.(2007)Rahman, Cooray, Rakov, Uman, Liyanage, DeCarlo,
Jerauld, and Olsen III</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rahman, M., Cooray, V., Rakov, V. A., Uman, M., Liyanage, P., DeCarlo, B.,
Jerauld, J., and Olsen III, R.: Measurements of NOx produced by
rocket-triggered lightning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027956" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027956</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Ringhausen et al.(2021)Ringhausen, Bitzer, Koshak, and
Mecikalski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ringhausen, J., Bitzer, P., Koshak, W., and Mecikalski, J.: Classification of
GLM flashes using random forests, Earth Space Sci., 8, e2021EA001861,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001861" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001861</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Ripoll et al.(2014)Ripoll, Zinn, Jeffery, and
Colestock</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ripoll, J.-F., Zinn, J., Jeffery, C. A., and Colestock, P. L.: On the dynamics
of hot air plasmas related to lightning discharges: 1. Gas dynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9196–9217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020068</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Rison et al.(1999)Rison, Thomas, Krehbiel, Hamlin, and
Harlin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rison, W., Thomas, R. J., Krehbiel, P. R., Hamlin, T., and Harlin,
J.: A GPS-based three-dimensional lightning mapping system: Initial
observations in central New Mexico, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3573,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010856" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010856</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Rodriguez et al.(2025)Rodriguez, van der Velde, Fabró, Pineda,
Balagué, and Montanyà</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rodriguez, O., van der Velde, O., Fabró, F., Pineda, N., Balagué, M.,
and Montanyà, J.: Severe storm signatures in three-dimensional lightning
data (LMA): isolated lightning on the overshooting cloud tops, Tech. rep.,
Copernicus Meetings, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ecss2025-109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ecss2025-109</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Roncancio et al.(2025)Roncancio, Montanyà, López, Urbani, and
van der Velde</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roncancio, J., Montanyà, J., López, J., Urbani, M., and van der Velde,
O.: Investigation of GLM detections of negative continuing currents observed
by high-speed video and narrow-band 777 nm photometer, Electr. Power Syst.
Res., 239, 111250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2024.111250" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2024.111250</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>San Segundo et al.(2020)San Segundo, López, Pineda, Altube, and
Montanya</label><mixed-citation>
      
San Segundo, H., López, J. A., Pineda, N., Altube, P., and Montanya, J.:
Sensitivity analysis of lightning stroke-to-flash grouping criteria, Atmos.
Res., 242, 105023, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105023</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Schulz et al.(2005)Schulz, Cummins, Diendorfer, and
Dorninger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schulz, W., Cummins, K., Diendorfer, G., and Dorninger, M.: Cloud-to-ground
lightning in Austria: A 10-year study using data from a lightning location
system, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005332" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005332</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Schulz et al.(2016)Schulz, Diendorfer, Pedeboy, and
Poelman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schulz, W., Diendorfer, G., Pedeboy, S., and Poelman, D. R.: The European lightning location system EUCLID – Part 1: Performance analysis and validation, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 595–605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-595-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-595-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Schumann and Huntrieser(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Seiler et al.(2025)Seiler, Pickering, Allen, Bucsela, and
Huntrieser</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seiler, M., Pickering, K., Allen, D., Bucsela, E., and Huntrieser, H.:
Evaluation of satellite-based lightning NOx columns using in-cloud aircraft
measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD043253,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD043253" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD043253</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Skamarock et al.(2003)Skamarock, Dye, Defer, Barth, Stith, Ridley,
and Baumann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Skamarock, W. C., Dye, J. E., Defer, E., Barth, M., Stith, J. L., Ridley,
B. A., and Baumann, K.: Observational- and modeling-based budget of
lightning-produced NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in a continental thunderstorm, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002163" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002163</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Skamarock et al.(2019)Skamarock, Klemp, Dudhia, Gill, Liu, Berner,
Wang, Powers, Duda, Barker et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J.,
Wang, W., Powers, J. G., Duda, M. G., Barker, D. M., Duda, M. G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of
the advanced research WRF version 4, NCAR tech. note ncar/tn-556+ str, 145,
<a href="http://pfigshare-u-files.s3.amazonaws.com/14057147/WRF_TechNote_Jan2019.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026),  2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Stark et al.(1996)Stark, Harrison, and Anastasi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stark, M., Harrison, J., and Anastasi, C.: Formation of nitrogen oxides by
electrical discharges and implications for atmospheric lightning, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 101, 6963–6969, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03008</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Stith et al.(1999)Stith, Dye, Ridley, Laroche, Defer, Baumann,
Hübler, Zerr, and Venticinque</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stith, J., Dye, J., Ridley, B., Laroche, P., Defer, E., Baumann, K.,
Hübler, G., Zerr, R., and Venticinque, M.: NO signatures from lightning
flashes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 16081–16089,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900174</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Tost et al.(2007)Tost, Jöckel, and
Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Lightning and convection parameterisations – uncertainties in global modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4553–4568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4553-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4553-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Van Der Velde et al.(2023)Van Der Velde, Montanya, López, Romero,
and Pineda</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Der Velde, O., Montanya, J., López, J. A., Romero, D., and Pineda, N.:
eLMA: The 2023 Upgrade of the Ebro 3D Lightning Mapping Array and
UV-Intensified High-Speed Camera System, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts,
2023,  AE11B–2419, <a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AGUFMAE11B2419V/abstract" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 October 2026), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>van der Velde et al.(2024)van der Velde, Romero, López,
Montanyà, Pineda, and Fabró</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Velde, O., Romero, D., López, J., Montanyà, J., Pineda, N., and Fabró, F.: New visualization and analysis tools for 3D Lightning Mapping Array data, EMS Annual Meeting 2024, Barcelona, Spain, 1–6 Sep 2024, EMS2024-978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2024-978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2024-978</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>van der Velde and Montanyà(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Velde, O. A. and Montanyà, J.: Asymmetries in bidirectional leader
development of lightning flashes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 13–504,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020257" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020257</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Van Geffen et al.(2022)Van Geffen, Eskes, Compernolle, Pinardi,
Verhoelst, Lambert, Sneep, Ter Linden, Ludewig, Boersma
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Geffen, J., Eskes, H., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Verhoelst, T., Lambert, J.-C., Sneep, M., ter Linden, M., Ludewig, A., Boersma, K. F., and Veefkind, J. P.: Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO2 retrieval: impact of version v2.2 improvements and comparisons with OMI and ground-based data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2037–2060, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2037-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2037-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Veefkind et al.(2012)Veefkind, Aben, McMullan, Förster, De Vries,
Otter, Claas, Eskes, De Haan, Kleipool et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veefkind, J., Aben, I., McMullan, K., Förster, H., De Vries, J., Otter, G.,
Claas, J., Eskes, H., De Haan, J., Kleipool, Q., van Weele, M., Hasekamp, O., Hoogeveen, R., Landgraf, J., Snel, R., Tol, P., Ingmann, P., Voors, R., Kruizinga, B., Vink, R., Visser, H., and Levelt, P. F.: TROPOMI on the
ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of
the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer
applications, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 70–83,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.027</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Visualization &amp; Analysis Systems
Technologies(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Visualization &amp; Analysis Systems Technologies: Geoscience Community Analysis
Toolkit: WRF-Python, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6W094P1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6W094P1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Wang et al.(2025)Wang, Zhang, Bozóki, Liang, Xie, Zhao, Wang,
Zhao, and Sun</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Bozóki, T., Liang, R., Xie, X., Zhao, S., Wang, R., Zhao, Y., and Sun, S.: Contributions of lightning to long-term trends and inter-annual variability in global atmospheric chemistry constrained by Schumann resonance observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8929–8942, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8929-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8929-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Wang et al.(1998)Wang, DeSilva, Goldenbaum, and
Dickerson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., DeSilva, A., Goldenbaum, G., and Dickerson, R.: Nitric oxide
production by simulated lightning: Dependence on current, energy, and
pressure, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 19149–19159,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01356</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Wemhoner et al.(2025)Wemhoner, da Silva, Leal, Bandara, Pantuso, and
Sonnenfeld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wemhoner, J., da Silva, C. L., Leal, A. F., Bandara, S., Pantuso, J. G., and
Sonnenfeld, R. G.: Near-infrared atomic oxygen photometry of lightning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042256" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042256</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Wiedinmyer et al.(2011)Wiedinmyer, Akagi, Yokelson, Emmons, Al-Saadi,
Orlando, and Soja</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L. K., Al-Saadi, J. A., Orlando, J. J., and Soja, A. J.: The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 625–641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011</a>, 2011.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>World Meteorological Organization(1957)</label><mixed-citation>
      
World Meteorological Organization: Meteorology – A Three-Dimensional Science:
Second Session of the Commission for Aerology, Tech. Rep. WMO Technical Note
No. 8, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland,
<a href="https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&amp;id=1260" target="_blank"/> (last access: 6 July 2026),
1957.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Wu et al.(2007)Wu, Mickley, Jacob, Logan, Yantosca, and
Rind</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, S., Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Yantosca, R. M., and Rind,
D.: Why are there large differences between models in global budgets of
tropospheric ozone?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007801" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007801</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Zel'dovich(1946)Zeldovich, Frank-Kamenetskii, and
Sadovnikov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zel'dovich, Y. B.: The Oxidation of Nitrogen in Combustion Explosions, Acta Physicochimica U.S.S.R., 21, 577–628, 1946.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>Zhang et al.(2022)Zhang, Yin, van der A, Eskes, van Geffen, Li,
Kuang, Lapierre, Chen, Zhen et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, X., Yin, Y., van der A, R., Eskes, H., van Geffen, J., Li, Y., Kuang, X., Lapierre, J. L., Chen, K., Zhen, Z., Hu, J., He, C., Chen, J., Shi, R., Zhang, J., Ye, X., and Chen, H.: Influence of convection on the upper-tropospheric O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> budget in southeastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5925–5942, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5925-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5925-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>Zoogman et al.(2017)Zoogman, Liu, Suleiman, Pennington, Flittner,
Al-Saadi, Hilton, Nicks, Newchurch, Carr et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zoogman, P., Liu, X., Suleiman, R., et al.: Tropospheric
emissions: Monitoring of pollution (TEMPO), J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 186, 17–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
