<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-13767-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Tropospheric OH and its trends: new insight into atmospheric processes and implications for methane lifetime</article-title><alt-title>Tropospheric OH and its trends</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>Xuewei</given-names></name>
          <email>houxw@nuist.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-8924</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hossaini</surname><given-names>Ryan</given-names></name>
          <email>r.hossaini@lancaster.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2395-6657</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wild</surname><given-names>Oliver</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6227-7035</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mazzeo</surname><given-names>Andrea</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-0934</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Pope</surname><given-names>Richard J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Ye</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9908-0349</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Siyuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Yuanhong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7 aff8">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>James</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-2872</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Bin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Tianliang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Pandey</surname><given-names>Alok K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, Florida, FL 33124, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Department of Environmental Sciences, Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110019, India</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Xuewei Hou (houxw@nuist.edu.cn) and Ryan Hossaini (r.hossaini@lancaster.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>13767</fpage><lpage>13793</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Xuewei Hou et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e241">The hydroxyl radical (OH) is a critical determinant of global oxidative capacity and trace gas lifetimes, but its variation remains poorly constrained. This study investigates the sensitivity of modelled tropospheric OH concentration changes to new understanding of physical and chemical processes using the FRSGC/UCI chemistry transport model. We show that simulated tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> agree well with satellite observations, but that annual variations in CO do not, likely due to uncertainties in biomass burning emissions in the southern hemisphere and overestimated CO trends over Asia. This discrepancy, along with the background increase in CO, may lead to an underestimation of OH increase or overestimation of OH decrease from 2000 to 2017. Changes in tropospheric OH column show substantial spatial heterogeneity, with increases in OH in high-emission regions and decreases in the tropics. Global mean OH trends are dependent on the assumed trend in emissions: with time-varying emissions there is little change in OH, while under annually invariant emissions, OH increases in response to changes in meteorological conditions. Inclusion of water vapor UV absorption, heterogeneous reactions, and updates to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction rate have a smaller impact, but decrease OH levels by 3.6 %, 5.8 %, and 7.0 %, respectively, increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetimes by 4.2 %, 5.2 %, and 8.4 %. Incorporating oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions reduces global mean OH by up to 1.5 %, increasing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime by up to 1.6 %. These results provide a quantitative basis for understanding the drivers of tropospheric OH variability and their implications for global methane chemistry.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2022YFC3701204</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Natural Environment Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>NE/R016518/1</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Natural Environment Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>LSO3, NE/V011863/1</award-id>
<award-id>InHALE, NE/X003582/</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e328">The hydroxyl radical (OH) is one of the most critical reactive species in the troposphere, regarded as the atmosphere's primary cleansing agent due to its role in initiating the oxidation of a wide array of trace gases, including nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), carbon monoxide (CO), and most volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (Holmes et al., 2013; Turner et al., 2019). The abundance and distribution of OH strongly influences the overall oxidative capacity of the atmosphere, thus affecting the lifetime of species relevant to both air quality and climate (Crutzen, 1979; Lawrence et al., 2001; Naik et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2019). Understanding the variability in OH and exploring the underpinning drivers is thus of major importance for predicting future atmospheric composition, including the interactions between natural and anthropogenic emissions and climate change (Voulgarakis et al., 2013; Lelieveld et al., 2016; Stevenson et al., 2020; Anderson et al., 2021; Chua et al., 2023, 2026; Liu et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e353">Changes in OH concentrations are driven by a multitude of factors, including variations in precursor emissions, meteorological conditions, and the availability of sunlight and water vapor, all of which affect photochemical reaction rates (Logan et al., 1981; Brasseur and Solomon, 2005). The balance between OH production and loss is governed by a set of interconnected processes, notably ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) photolysis, reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO, and regeneration cycles involving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and organic peroxy radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fiore et al., 2024). These complex photochemical processes collectively result in a highly heterogeneous spatial and temporal distribution of OH, with concentrations typically peaking in tropical regions where both solar radiation and water vapor are most abundant (Spivakovsky et al., 2000; Anderson et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e400">An important finding from model intercomparisons is that most chemical transport models (CTMs) and chemistry-climate models (CCMs) underestimate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime against OH oxidation in the troposphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to estimates based on observations. Multi-model mean values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution (HTAP), Atmospheric Composition Change: the European Network of Excellence (ACCENT), and Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) model intercomparisons were 10.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 9.7 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 9.7 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) years, respectively (Shindell et al., 2006; Fiore et al., 2009; Naik et al., 2013), whereas observationally-constrained estimates, such as those of Prather et al. (2012), suggest a longer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 11.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) years. This bias in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies that most models overestimate OH concentrations. However, a multitude of processes influence OH concentration, including uncertainties in precursor emissions and in the representation of physical and chemical processes, many of which are relatively poorly understood and/or offer limited observational constraint (e.g. Fiore et al., 2024). Detailed sensitivity analysis also reveals that the drivers of OH concentration and its variability can differ substantially across models (Wild et al., 2020), making it challenging to attribute the causes of OH biases. Several previously neglected or uncertain physical and chemical processes may contribute to uncertainties in simulated OH, but the magnitude of their impacts remains insufficiently quantified. Better constraining these process-level effects is therefore important for understanding the high-OH bias commonly found in global models and, more broadly, for improving simulations of atmospheric oxidative capacity.</p>
      <p id="d2e499">Among the processes that have recently received increased attention is the absorption of ultraviolet radiation (UV) by water vapour (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which was previously thought to be minor. Prather and Zhu (2024) showed that inclusion of this process in a global CTM reduced OH primary production and increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. The study highlighted that water vapour UV absorption may partly resolve some of the apparent low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bias present in other models.</p>
      <p id="d2e548">Second, while the potential importance of heterogeneous chemistry for tropospheric oxidants is well established from lab studies (e.g. Thornton et al., 2003; Stewart et al., 2004), observations (e.g. Cantrell et al., 1996; Tabazadeh et al., 2004) and modelling work (e.g. Jacob, 2000; Tie et al., 2003; Macintyre and Evans, 2010), recent findings have reaffirmed and extended current understanding. Using the GEOS-Chem CTM with revised uptake coefficients, Holmes et al. (2019) showed that inclusion of heterogeneous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry increased the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 6.9 % relative to a model run without heterogeneous chemistry. Contrary to some previous findings, they showed that heterogeneous chemistry on clouds exerts an effect of similar magnitude to that occurring on aerosols. Holmes et al. (2019) also emphasized the importance of accounting for entrainment limitations when parameterizing cloud heterogeneous processes, an approach that has yet to be adopted in most models. The effects of heterogeneous chemistry on tropospheric composition have also been examined by Ha et al. (2021) who reported an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 5.9 % due to its inclusion in the CHASER MIROC Earth System Model.</p>
      <p id="d2e584">Third, more detailed measurements of the rate coefficient for the termolecular <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OH+NO2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) have been reported by Amedro et al. (2019, 2020) and Rolletter et al. (2025). The rate of this reaction exerts a strong influence on the tropospheric abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH and is therefore of fundamental importance (e.g. Newsome and Evans, 2017; Christian et al., 2018). The two new studies report that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OH+NO2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows only a weak dependence on water vapor over the tested range of partial pressures. They recommend a rate coefficient of (1.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 295 K and 1 atm. We compare this with the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 298 K and 1 atm for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pathway recommended by the most recent NASA–Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) report (Burkholder et al., 2020), neglecting the role of the alternative HOONO formation pathway which is assumed to reform OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e766">Fourth, positive sea-to-air fluxes of a range of oxygenated VOCs have been observed in field studies (e.g. Yang et al., 2014; Phillips et al., 2021). While the magnitude and variability of these VOC emissions remain uncertain, in the remote marine boundary layer these species may provide a substantial local OH sink, with oceanic emissions of acetaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) postulated as being particularly important (e.g. Read et al., 2012). To date, there have been very few global model assessments of the significance of this effect, but a growing number of studies highlight oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions as a contributor to missing OH reactivity and hence a cause of bias in estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime (e.g. Wang et al., 2019; Travis et al., 2020). Taken together, these recent findings motivate a systematic assessment of their impacts within a common modelling framework, allowing their effects on OH and methane lifetime to be quantified consistently and their potential implications for improving global OH simulations to be evaluated. Alongside constraining the processes that lead to OH production and loss, over the past few decades numerous observational and modeling studies have sought to quantify interannual variability and possible trends in OH concentration, both regionally and globally. While direct measurements of OH concentration are challenging due to its short atmospheric lifetime (on the order of seconds), indirect methods such as inverse modeling based on the observed atmospheric burdens of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and methyl chloroform (MCF) have provided valuable insights (Montzka et al., 2011; Naik et al., 2013; Patra et al., 2021; Prinn et al., 2000; Thompson et al., 2024). In addition, satellite observations combined with steady-state chemical approaches have recently been used to infer mid-tropospheric OH variability, suggesting relatively stable OH over time with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a primary driver and CO playing a larger role during intense biomass burning years (Pimlott et al., 2022). Although these studies suggest that global mean OH concentration has remained relatively stable, with fluctuations driven by interannual variability in the emissions of OH precursors and sinks such as CO, VOCs, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as by meteorological factors (Prinn et al., 2000; Turner et al., 2017), substantial uncertainties persist regarding the temporal trends in regional OH concentration, particularly in the tropics and mid-latitudes (Patra et al., 2014; Anderson et al., 2024). Some studies indicate a decrease in OH from about 2005 (Rigby et al., 2017; McNorton et al., 2016). Other studies have found evidence of increasing OH during 1980–2010 dominated by elevated primary production and reduced loss of OH due to decreasing CO after 2005 (Chua et al., 2023; Stevenson et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020). Attributing OH variability remains challenging, with different models showing widely differing responses in OH concentrations to changes in these drivers, particularly to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and humidity (Wild et al., 2020; Nicely et al., 2020). These discrepancies highlight the importance of improving both observational coverage and model representation of OH-related processes in the troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e851">In this study, we employ a global CTM to (1) quantify the effects of several recently identified or updated processes, including UV absorption by water vapour, heterogeneous chemistry, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OH+NO2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate coefficient, and oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, on global and regional OH concentrations and methane lifetime, and assess whether their improved representation could help reduce the high-OH (low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) bias commonly found in global models; and (2) analyze the interannual variability and trends of global and regional OH since 2000 and quantify the contributions of changes in emissions and meteorology to these trends. The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the CTM and recent updates, including the addition of heterogeneous chemistry on cloud and aerosol surfaces. It also describes the model sensitivity experiments that were performed and the observational datasets used to evaluate the model. Section 3 provides an evaluation of the CTM, focusing on its ability to reproduce measurements of key gases relevant to the OH budget (e.g. tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO). Our main results are presented in Sect. 4, including our model sensitivity analysis of global and regional OH concentrations, OH budgets, impacts of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, and regional and global OH trends. A summary with concluding remarks is given in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Chemistry Transport Model</title>
      <p id="d2e940">The global chemistry transport model (CTM) used here is the Frontier Research System for Global Change version of the University of California, Irvine (FRSGC/UCI CTM) described in Wild and Prather (2000). The model has been widely used to study the chemistry and transport of tropospheric trace gases, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH (Wild et al., 2020), and the results have contributed to model intercomparison studies such as the Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution (HTAP) project (Fiore et al., 2009). The offline CTM uses meteorological data generated with the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) version Cy38r1. In this work, the model was run at a T42 horizontal resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with 57 vertical levels extending from the surface to 0.1 hPa.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Gas phase chemistry</title>
      <p id="d2e978">The model includes an explicit treatment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, and lumped non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) chemistry for the representative species butane, propene, xylene and isoprene (Wild, 2007). The updated version of the CTM used here contains 75 bimolecular reactions, 15 termolecular reactions and 21 photolysis reactions, summarized in Tables S1–S3 in the Supplement. Rate constants are principally taken from the most recent JPL evaluation (Burkholder et al., 2020). A notable exception is for the reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for which we use the expressions given by Amedro et al. (2019). Recent updates to the model also include a treatment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ultraviolet absorption following Prather and Zhu (2024).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Heterogeneous chemistry</title>
      <p id="d2e1055">For this study we have added a treatment of heterogeneous chemistry to the model. This uses a standard reaction probability formulation (e.g. Jacob, 2000) based on prescribed uptake coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for different cloud particles and aerosol surfaces. The first order rate coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), for the heterogeneous removal of a species to cloud or aerosol is expressed as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M63" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SAD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean square molecular speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and SAD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the available cloud particle or aerosol surface area density. The molecular speed is given by:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ideal gas constant (8.315 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature (K) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molar mass of the gas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1247">A summary of the heterogeneous reactions included in the CTM is given in Table S4. These include the hydrolysisof <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form nitric acid on cloud ice and liquid water droplets and on five aerosol types: sea-salt, dust, sulphate, black carbon and organic carbon. We also include heterogeneous reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the same sets of surfaces. The adopted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for each surface, some of which depend on temperature and relative humidity, are taken from the literature and summarized in Table S4.</p>
      <p id="d2e1306">For cloud ice and liquid water droplets, tropospheric surface area density is calculated online using the ice water content (IWC) and liquid water content (LWC) fields from the ECMWF IFS meteorological data and following the expressions outlined by Holmes et al. (2019).

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M78" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SAD</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IWC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SAD</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>liq</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LWC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In Eqs. (3) and (4) above, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the density of ice (916.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and liquid water (1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. The effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for ice particles is calculated as a function of temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) using the empirically-based parameterization of Heymsfield et al. (2014). For liquid water droplets, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed to be 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for marine clouds and 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for continental clouds. When considering the impacts of heterogeneous processes on cloud or ice surfaces, we account for the limitation on uptake due to entrainment of air into clouds under partially cloudy conditions following Holmes et al. (2019), applying the cloud volume fraction from the meteorological fields and assuming a characteristic time scale of one hour.</p>
      <p id="d2e1471">For aerosols, tropospheric surface area density was calculated from the aerosol climatology described by Bozzo et al. (2020). This climatology provides monthly mean aerosol mass for five components (sea-salt, dust, sulphate, black carbon and organic carbon) and is based on a reanalysis of atmospheric composition from the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) over the period 2003–2013. We derived the surface area density for each aerosol type using the particle density, modal radius and size distribution given by Bozzo et al. (2020), accounting for hygroscopic growth governed by the ambient humidity. The resulting annual mean surface area density fields at the surface and in the troposphere are shown in Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplement. Note that the aerosol distributions are prescribed and are used only to represent their effects on chemistry and photolysis; aerosol formation and transport are not interactively simulated. The monthly climatology captures seasonal variations but does not account for interannual variability, and this may limit our assessment of the effects of aerosol heterogeneous chemistry on OH trends.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Emissions</title>
      <p id="d2e1482">In the base run of the model, monthly emissions of CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) are prescribed largely from CAMS datasets. Anthropogenic emissions are from version 6.2 of the CAMS-GLOB-ANT inventory (Soulie et al., 2024), aircraft emissions from version 2.1 of CAMS-GLOB-AIR (Granier et al., 2019), biogenic emissions from version 3.1 of CAMS-GLOB-BIO (Sindelarova et al., 2022) and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from version 2.4 of CAMS-GLOB-SOI (Simpson and Darras, 2021). Fire emissions are taken from the Global Fire Emissions Database, Version 4.1 (GFED4s) inventory (van der Werf et al., 2017). All emissions vary annually over our full simulation period. Ocean emissions of CO and selected hydrocarbons are taken from the POET emission inventory and are assumed to be climatological (Granier et al., 2005). Lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are calculated interactively in the model as a function of convective air mass flux at 440 hPa following Allen and Pickering (2002) and Pickering et al. (1998), and vary annually, providing a source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1552">For each emitted tracer, annual global total emissions over our study period (2000 to 2017) are shown in Fig. S3. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an annual and latitudinally varying mixing ratio is prescribed using the historical forcing data prepared for CMIP6 from 2000 until 2014 (Meinshausen et al., 2017). After 2014, to match the observed record, the fields are scaled by a globally uniform factor derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) global monitoring network.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Model runs</title>
      <p id="d2e1586">A total of nine model hindcast runs were conducted. Seven of these were long-term runs spanning the period 2000–2017, and two were shorter sensitivity runs covering 2016–2017 only. All runs included a spin-up over the preceding 20-month period. The control run (CTL) included the updated physical and chemical processes detailed above, including UV water vapor absorption and heterogeneous chemistry, but did not include oceanic emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sensitivity runs were then performed to quantify the OH response to different processes. These include a run with fixed emissions from the year 2000 (fixEmis), a run without UV water vapor absorption (noWVA), a run without heterogeneous chemistry on cloud surfaces (noCloud), a run without heterogeneous chemistry on aerosol surfaces (noAero), a run without heterogeneous chemistry on both cloud and aerosol surfaces (noHete), a run with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OH+NO2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> taken from the most recent JPL evaluation (JPL) and two shorter runs (ALD-cesm and ALD-geoc) that included oceanic emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A summary of model runs is provided in Table 1.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1629">Summary of model experiments and settings. Bold text indicates settings in each sensitivity experiment that differ from those in the CTL simulation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Water Vapor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cloud</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Aerosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OH+NO2+M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Simulation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Absorption</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">at <bold>298 K</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">period</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2000–2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fixEmis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>CAMS_2000</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2000–2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noWVA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>off</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2000–2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noCloud</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>off</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2000–2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noAero</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>off</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2000–2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noHete</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>off</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>off</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2000–2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1.05</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2000–2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALD-cesm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>40.8</bold> <bold>Tg yr</bold><sup><bold>-</bold><bold>1</bold></sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>2016–2017</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ALD-geoc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">on</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>62.7</bold> <bold>Tg yr</bold><sup><bold>-</bold><bold>1</bold></sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>2016–2017</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e1632">Notes: CAMS_2000 indicates that all emissions and prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are fixed to year 2000 levels, but meteorology varies annually. Cloud refers to the heterogeneous chemistry of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on cloud surfaces (cloud water droplet, cloud ice). Aerosol refers to the heterogeneous chemistry of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on five aerosol surfaces (sea salt, dust, black carbon, organic carbon, and sulfate). The reaction coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 298 K (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OH+NO2+M</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is calculated based on the equations in Table S2. Run JPL used the rate constant from Burkholder et al. (2020).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2343">In the subsequent sections, differences between each sensitivity run and the control are used to quantify the response of global mean OH concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the respective process. We also examine how these factors influence the temporal trends in OH. Run fixEmis is designed to isolate the effect of meteorological variability on OH. Heterogeneous reactions occurring on cloud and aerosol surfaces may compete for the same species (Holmes et al., 2019), and therefore sensitivity runs were designed to isolate the effects of clouds and aerosols separately, and also to examine their combined impact. Run JPL is used for quantifying the impacts of the updated rate constant for the key <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction (Amedro et al., 2019, 2020) on OH and to compare with previous studies (Burkholder et al., 2020). The impact of processes already represented in the control run, such as water vapor UV absorption and heterogeneous chemistry, are quantified by removing them in the corresponding sensitivity runs. Oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions remain highly uncertain, as reflected in the substantial difference between the two emission estimates considered here, and are therefore not included in the control run. We therefore consider two separate sensitivity runs, ALD-cesm and ALD-geoc, to assess the potential impact of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and the sensitivity of this impact to the prescribed oceanic source.In the control run, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are prescribed from biogenic (15.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), biomass burning (2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and anthropogenic (9.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) sources only. Runs ALD-cesm and ALD-geoc are identical to the control run except that they additionally include a prescribed monthly oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source. The two oceanic emission estimates were obtained from models incorporating online parameterizations of the sea-air flux of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Run ALD-cesm uses <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for the year 2015 obtained from the Community Earth System Model, version 2.2.0 (CESM2, Emmons et al., 2020), while run ALD-geoc uses <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from a GEOS-Chem simulation (version 13.4), run with settings similar to Millet et al. (2010) and Wang et al. (2019), respectively. The global annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ocean sources are 40.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in CESM2 and 62.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in GEOS-Chem, illustrating the substantial uncertainty in the magnitude of this source. The distributions of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission are shown in Fig. S4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Satellite data</title>
      <p id="d2e2586">As part of our model evaluation, we consider tropospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument/Microwave Limb Sounder (OMI/MLS) dataset over the period 2005–2017. The resolution of the dataset is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a latitude range of 59.5° S to 59.5° N and longitude range of 180° W to 180° E. Further details of the OMI/MLS product are discussed by Ziemke et al. (2006).</p>
      <p id="d2e2616">We use tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column from OMI QA4ECV version 1.1 for 2005–2017 released by the Tropospheric Emission Monitoring Internet Service. The OMI QA4ECV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data set is based on revised spectral ﬁtting features accounting for improved absorption cross sections, instrument calibration, and surface effects (Boersma et al., 2018; Zara et al., 2018). The data are processed according to the data quality recommendations and were validated against ground measurements (Compernolle et al., 2020). This product includes averaging kernel information which has been used for model-satellite comparison to account for the satellite vertical sensitivity (i.e. like-for-like comparisons). To reduce comparison representation errors, each satellite retrieval is spatiotemporally co-located (within 1 h temporally and the neighboring grid box spatially) with the model and the simulated profile interpolated onto the satellite pressure grid. The model sub-columns are calculated and the averaging kernel applied (as discussed by Archibald et al., 2020), which are totaled between the surface and tropopause to derive the averaging kernel-modified model tropospheric column. Here, each satellite retrieval has been filtered for a cloud radiance fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a quality <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>flag</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, solar zenith <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>angle</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80.0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, snow-ice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>flag</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, tropospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a AMFtrop/AMFgeo (geometric air mass factor) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ratio</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2746">MOPITT derived CO (Near and Thermal Infrared Radiances) V9 from the NASA Earth data archive are used for 2001–2017. The V9 product provides substantially improved retrieval coverage over land (30 %–40 % higher than V8) owing to an enhanced cloud detection algorithm and improved calibration of the near-infrared channels, while maintaining retrieval biases generally within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Deeter et al., 2022). Individual MOPITT CO retrievals are filtered for a degree of freedom of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>signal</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. MOPITT CO data has already been pre-filtered for cloud cover in the data product. For the model-satellite comparisons, like for tropospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the model is spatiotemporally co-located with the retrievals and the model CO profile interpolated onto the satellite pressure grid. The averaging kernel are applied following the approach documented in Archibald et al. (2020) yielding a modified model profile (in vmr). The model sub-columns are then derived and totaled up from the surface to the top-of-atmosphere to calculate the total column.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Site and vertical profile data</title>
      <p id="d2e2790">Surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations used for model evaluation were obtained from the gridded Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR) global database (Schultz et al., 2017b). The TOAR database compiles surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements from thousands of monitoring stations worldwide and provides harmonized metrics derived from quality-controlled observations. We use gridded ozone metrics generated by aggregating station observations within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells for the period 1990–2014. The dataset provides monthly statistical metrics, including daytime mean, nighttime mean, median, and mean rural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. In this study, the monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dataset was used for the period 2000–2014 to evaluate the simulated surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d2e2865">Observed vertical profiles of OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) have been used to help evaluate the model. The ATom mission consisted of four aircraft campaigns (Table 2) with an overarching goal of advancing scientific understanding of the impact of human activities on the tropospheric budget of a wide range of trace gases related to air quality and climate (e.g. Thompson et al., 2022). Measurements were made onboard the NASA DC-8 aircraft in each of the four seasons over a 3-year period (2016–2018), across a large latitude range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° N to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° S), and up to an altitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km (Wofsy et al., 2021). For OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, measurements were made using the Airborne Tropospheric Hydrogen Oxides Sensor instrument. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, measurements were made using the Trace Organic Gas Analyzer instrument. These observational datasets underwent careful calibration and quality assurance prior to public release and have been widely used for atmospheric chemistry research and model evaluation (Wang et al., 2019). The time resolution of these data is 10 s for OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 20 s for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The number of valid measurements is listed in Table 2. For comparison to this measurement data, hourly output from the model was sampled along the aircraft flight tracks.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2961">Summary of ATom measurements used to evaluate the model simulation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mission</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Month/Year</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Total number of observed samples</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ATom-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">July–August 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1051 (OH), 1138 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 1270 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ATom-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">January–February 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1396 (OH), 1582 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 1315 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ATom-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">September–October 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1368 (OH), 1474 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 1497 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ATom-4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">April–May 2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1233 (OH), 1352 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 1724 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS8">
  <label>2.8</label><title>Trend analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e3145">Trends in atmospheric trace gas columns, including tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, total CO column, and tropospheric OH, were estimated using the Theil–Sen slope estimator, a robust non-parametric method that calculates the median of all pairwise slopes (Theil, 1950; Sen, 1968). The statistical significance of trends was assessed with the Mann–Kendall test, a non-parametric method for detecting monotonic trends in time series without assuming a specific data distribution (Mann, 1945; Kendall, 1975). Trend analyses were performed at each grid point for all species. In addition, the global tropospheric mean OH concentration, weighted by airmass, was analyzed for seasonal trends to assess temporal variations throughout the year. These methods are particularly suitable for atmospheric chemistry observations and model outputs, which often contain noise, outliers, and non-normally distributed values. Trends in this study were considered significant at the 95 % confidence level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Evaluation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Surface data</title>
      <p id="d2e3198">Simulated monthly mean surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for 2000–2014 were evaluated against gridded observations from the TOAR dataset in the northern hemisphere (Fig. 1). The model reproduces the large-scale spatial distribution and seasonal cycle of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> well, with enhanced concentrations over major mid-latitude regions such as North America, Europe, and East Asia. However, surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is generally overestimated in most regions. As an annual global mean, the model simulates 36.7 ppbv compared with 30.2 ppbv from TOAR, corresponding to a positive bias of about 6.5 ppbv. The bias is smaller in January (4.8 ppbv) but greater in July (9.9 ppbv), indicating stronger overestimation during summer when photochemical production is more active. One contribution to this bias is from the relatively coarse vertical resolution of the model, where the 90 m depth of the lowest layer does not fully represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface, where there may be substantial removal by dry deposition. Despite this bias, the model captures the main spatial patterns and seasonal variability of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Regional scatter plots (Fig. S5) further show that the model captures the observed variability of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reasonably well, with correlation coefficients of 0.6–0.8 across North America, Europe, and East Asia, with the strongest agreement over Europe. Comparisons of the sensitivity simulations with TOAR show only small differences in surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the control run over these three regions (Fig. S6), indicating that the processes examined here have a relatively limited influence on surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at northern mid-latitudes. Evaluation shows comparable performance to the MOZART-4 simulation by Fei et al. (2021) and the CESM FCSD simulation in Hou et al. (2023a).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3292">Observed monthly mean surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppbv) from TOAR and corresponding simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the model control run for the period January 2000 to December 2014. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> show the distributions of annual mean observed and simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, while panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the model–observation difference. Panels <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> show the corresponding regional mean time series over North America, Europe, and East Asia, respectively, with line colours indicating observations and model simulations. All modelled means are calculated only for grid squares with available observations. Global mean values are shown in the upper right corner of panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold>. The regional mean values, correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) between observed and simulated regional means, and root mean square error (RMSE) are shown in the lower right corner of panels <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Satellite data</title>
      <p id="d2e3378">Primary production of tropospheric OH occurs via the photodissociation of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by UV radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">310</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) to produce excited singlet oxygen atoms (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Talukdar et al., 1998) which may then react with water vapor. Therefore, the ability of models to simulate tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is of direct importance to accurate simulation of OH.</p>
      <p id="d2e3432">As shown in Fig. 2a–c, the model captures the salient features of the spatial distribution of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column from OMI/MLS satellite observation well. There is high bias in low latitude regions which may be attributed to the low vertical resolution, uncertainty in diagnosing the tropopause and overestimation of the effects of lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the model (Griffiths et al., 2021), and the uncertainties in vertical sensitivity of the observation instrument. This positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bias may contribute to enhanced primary OH production in these regions. The correlation coefficient of the annual mean tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column between model and observation exceeds 0.6 in most regions and is significant at the 95 % level (Fig. 2d), suggesting that the year-to-year variations in the simulated and observed tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column are largely consistent. Low or negative correlations at high latitudes may partly arise from differences in the representation of the tropopause between the model and the OMI/MLS observations.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3492">Multiyear average (2005–2017) tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column (DU) from <bold>(a)</bold> the model control run and <bold>(b)</bold> OMI/MLS satellite observations. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the corresponding mean bias of the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column (model minus observation), and <bold>(d)</bold> shows the correlation coefficient between annual mean modelled and OMI/MLS tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column time series at each grid box. Annual mean tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column trends (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are shown in <bold>(e)</bold> for the model and <bold>(f)</bold> for satellite observations over the 2005–2017 period. Global mean columns between 60° S–60° N are indicated in the upper right corner of panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold>. Shaded areas in <bold>(d)</bold> indicate regions where the correlation is statistically significant at the 95 % confidence level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Trends in panels <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> were calculated using the Theil–Sen method, and stippling indicates areas with significant trends at the 95 % confidence level according to the Mann–Kendall test.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3610">Both the model and observations show a significant increase in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column from 2000 to 2017, especially over northern hemisphere mid-latitude regions, although the observed trends are generally stronger and more significant (Fig. 2e and f). The weaker simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in these regions may lead to an underestimation of its contribution to increasing OH. As discussed in previous research, the increase of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column is mainly attributed to changes in emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors, especially over high pollution regions (Hou et al., 2023b; Wang et al., 2022; Ziemke et al., 2019; Young et al., 2018). Over the tropical Pacific Ocean, both the model and observations show decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column. Over southern North America and Mexico, in contrast to the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase, the model shows a weak decrease (Fig. 2e), which is likely driven by decreases in anthropogenic emissions in the model (Liu et al., 2022). The simulated tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden and budget are also broadly consistent with previous studies and fall within the reported uncertainty ranges (Table S5). The sensitivity experiments show that the processes examined here can affect the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budget, particularly through changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production and loss (Table S5). Comparison with OMI/MLS observations further shows that removing heterogeneous chemistry increases the positive TCO bias, particularly in the tropics, indicating that its inclusion in the control run improves the simulated TCO. In contrast, the JPL simulation, which uses the slower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction rate coefficient, produces a larger positive TCO bias (Fig. S7). Overall, the model captures the major spatial characteristics and interannual variability of the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column reasonably well, although regional differences are evident in the trends. These differences may contribute to uncertainty in simulated OH trends.</p>
      <p id="d2e3758">As a key precursor of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and regulator of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a substantial impact on OH abundance and its temporal evolution. Trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may drive the modelled increase in OH (Chua et al., 2023), so it is important to explore how well the modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends match observations. As shown in Fig. 3a–d, the spatial distribution of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column is simulated well by the model. There is a relatively high model bias in NH mid latitude regions around 45° N, although the satellite data has a relatively large uncertainty here. This positive bias is comparable to that reported in previous model studies over (e.g. Archibald et al., 2020, in the Northern Hemisphere and Monks et al., 2017, over Europe), suggesting that the magnitude of the bias is broadly consistent with current-generation chemistry-climate and chemistry-transport models. The simulated interannual variations over our study period match the satellite observations well (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05), over most of the world, including East Asia, Europe, North America and South Africa. While the model performance is weaker in remote regions, the key result is over urban regions with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loading which will have more influence on OH. The modelled trend in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column is broadly consistent with previous studies (Elshorbany et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2022) showing a significant increase over South Asia and most parts of East Asia, and a significant decrease over Europe and North America from 2000 to 2017 (Fig. 3e and f). These changes are primarily attributed to variations in emissions (Miyazaki et al., 2017) and match the spatial distribution observed in OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data. The generally good agreement in the spatial patterns and temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provides support for the simulated influence of changing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions on OH trends, particularly over polluted regions.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3912">Same as Fig. 2, but for tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and annual mean tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column trends (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4013">Figure 4a and b compares the modelled CO column distribution to that observed from MOPITT. The agreement between the two datasets is generally strong, although the model underestimates CO in most regions (Fig. 4c). As seen in Fig. 4d, the model captures the interannual variations well over most parts of the world (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The MOPITT CO column generally shows significant decreases across much of the globe, consistent with earlier results from, for example, Yin et al. (2015) and Chua et al. (2023). However, in contrast the modelled CO columns show significant increases over China, India, and Africa with weaker decreases in parts of Europe, North America, and the Middle East (Fig. 4e). The MOPITT and modelled changes in the CO column show poor agreement, with the model failing to capture the observed decrease reported by MOPITT, particularly over China, India and much of the Southern Hemisphere (SH). A similar mismatch was identified in the modelling study of Chua et al. (2023) which used the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) CCM driven by the CMIP6 emission inventory. Chua et al. (2023) note that the mismatch could point towards deficiencies in the emissions that drive the high bias in CO column trends over China and South Asia and in turn lead to the general high bias globally due to transport from these regions, especially via the prevailing westerlies (Zheng et al., 2018). Consistent with this, Gaubert et al. (2020) showed that correcting anthropogenic CO emission in East Asia reduces model bias by 29 % for CO, 11 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 27 % for OH. In the Southern Hemisphere, the mismatch may partly arise from uncertainties in the biomass burning emission inventory used in the model (Chua et al., 2023). As the main sink of OH in the troposphere, the mismatch and positive trend in CO may lead to underestimation of any OH increase or overestimation of any OH decrease over the 2000–2017 period. Discrepancies in the CO changes may thus have a substantial impact on the modelled interannual variation in OH.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4041">Same as Fig. 1, but for total CO column (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and annual mean total CO column trends (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Vertical profiles of OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e4138">The ATom campaign (Wofsy et al., 2021) provides an unprecedented opportunity to test model performance in the remote atmosphere with a detailed suite of chemical observations. Figure 5 shows modeled OH sampled along the flight tracks and compared to observed OH for ATom-1 (boreal summer 2016), ATom-2 (boreal winter 2017), ATom-3 (boreal autumn 2017), and Atom-4 (boreal spring 2018) in each hemisphere from the lowest sampled altitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa) to 150 hPa.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4153">Median OH concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the Northern Hemisphere (NH, top row) and Southern Hemisphere (SH, bottom) measured during the ATom aircraft missions (black) along with the corresponding results from the model control run (FRSGC/UCI, red). Dashed lines show the observed 25th–75th percentiles.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4192">The model generally reproduces tropospheric OH well, with simulated concentrations falling within observational uncertainty across the environments considered here and no clear systematic bias throughout the troposphere. The model overestimates OH in the northern hemisphere in summer and this may reflect excessive OH production (see previous discussion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> biases and Fig. 2c) or an underestimated sink from CO (Fig. 4c). Models tend to overestimate OH on a global scale against constraints from methane and methyl chloroform observations (Shindell et al., 2006; Naik et al., 2013; Nicely et al., 2017), but we find that tropospheric OH is simulated relatively well, within observational uncertainty, in the environments considered here. This good agreement is consistent with box model studies comparing OH with measurements during NASA's Pacific Exploratory Mission–Tropics (PEM-Tropic B) campaign in the clean remote Pacific (Tan et al., 2001) and a similar analysis by Travis et al. (2020) for Atom 1–2 and Brune et al. (2020) for ATom 1–4.</p>
      <p id="d2e4207">Modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is overestimated in the mid-troposphere, except in northern hemisphere winter (Fig. 6). One possible reason is the influence of biomass-burning emissions. Observations from ATom indicate that air masses influenced by biomass burning, identified using tracers such as HCN and enhanced CO, are frequently encountered in the tropical and subtropical troposphere and can be transported over remote oceans at altitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–4 km (e.g. Wofsy et al., 2021; Strode et al., 2018). These air masses contain elevated CO and VOCs that can enhance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycling and promote <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (e.g. Tan et al., 2001; Brune et al., 2020; Fiore et al., 2024), especially in spring and summer. An overestimate in biomass-burning emissions could lead to excessive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production. However, uncertainties in long-range transport and radical recycling may also contribute to the simulated bias. Overall, the general spatial and temporal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are represented relatively well, although there is an overestimation remaining in the mid troposphere. For both the OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model-measurement comparisons, the measurement uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for each species should be borne in mind (Brune et al., 2020).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4299">As Fig. 5, but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (pptv).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Global tropospheric OH</title>
      <p id="d2e4335">Global tropospheric mean airmass-weighted OH concentration ([OH]<sub>gm</sub>) was calculated for each model run for the year 2000 and as an average for the period 2000–2017 (Table 3). For 2000, [OH]<sub>gm</sub> from the control run (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is very similar to the ACCMIP multi-model mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s.d.) estimate of 11.1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the same year (Naik et al., 2013), about 1.8 % lower but well within the full spread of ACCMIP models. The corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime against tropospheric OH oxidation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is 10.0 years. For comparison, the multi-model mean estimate from ACCMIP for the same year is 9.7 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) years. Our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  estimate is close to, and within the uncertainty range, of observationally derived estimates, including the 10.2 (9.5–11.1) years estimated by Prinn et al. (2005) and 11.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) years estimated by Prather et al. (2012). As OH is the principal tropospheric sink of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, these comparisons suggest that our CTM produces a reasonable simulation of [OH]<sub>gm</sub>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4520">Modelled global tropospheric airmass-weighted OH concentration ([OH]<sub>gm</sub>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime against tropospheric OH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Results are shown for the year 2000 and the mean of the period 2000 to 2017.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">[OH]<sub>gm</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (years) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2000–2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2000–2017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fixEmis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noWVA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noCloud</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noAero</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noHete</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e4554">Note: Values following “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>” represent 1 standard deviation over the period 2000–2017.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e4932"><bold>(a)</bold> Zonal mean (latitude-pressure) cross sections of annual mean OH concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the CTL run and the effects on tropospheric OH (in %) of <bold>(b)</bold> water vapor UV absorption (WVA), <bold>(c)</bold> cloud heterogeneous reactions (Cloud), <bold>(d)</bold> aerosol heterogeneous reactions (Aerosol), <bold>(e)</bold> all heterogeneous reactions (Hete), and <bold>(f)</bold> the updated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction rate. Percentage differences are calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CTL</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>experiment</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CTL</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The troposphere was defined as the region below a climatological tropopause (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">215</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>lat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) following Lawrence et al. (2001).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5065">Figure 7a shows zonal mean OH concentration from the control run averaged over the period 2000–2017. The other panels show percentage differences associated with the selected sensitivity experiments. The control run shows high OH concentrations between 30° S and 30° N in the lower to middle troposphere, with larger values in the northern hemisphere, that reflect the sources of OH, matching the results of previous assessments (Stevenson et al., 2020). Excluding the effects of water vapour UV absorption leads to higher OH throughout the troposphere, especially in the tropical lower troposphere where humidity is relatively high. Water vapor absorption reduces photolysis rates in the troposphere leading to decreases in OH of 6 %–10 % at the surface in the tropics (Fig. 7b). On a global basis, [OH]<sub>gm</sub> is reduced by 3.6 % compared to the control run and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lengthened by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Table 3). The magnitude of these responses is in close agreement with that reported by Prather and Zhu (2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e5098">The effects of heterogeneous chemistry on cloud surfaces (liquid water and ice) and aerosol are shown in Fig. 7c–e. The cloud impact peaks at high latitudes in the free troposphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), while the aerosol impact peaks at mid-latitudes close to the surface. Their combined effect on OH is spatially extensive. The spatial pattern is primarily driven by the vertical distribution of clouds and the near-surface high concentration of aerosol. The differences in their impact stems from differences in where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is removed: aerosols primarily scavenge <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the lower troposphere over industrial regions where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are high, whereas clouds exert a stronger influence in remote, high-altitude regions where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are low (Holmes et al., 2019). As a result, heterogeneous chemistry on cloud surfaces has a disproportionately large effect on global OH despite occurring in areas with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As shown in Table 3, if cloud heterogeneous reactions are neglected, [OH]<sub>gm</sub> increases 2.4 %, which results in a 1.7 % decrease in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime. Neglecting heterogeneous aerosol reactions yields larger changes: a 3.2 % increase in [OH]<sub>gm</sub>, and 3.6 % decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime. The impact of cloud heterogeneous reactions matches the results of Holmes et al. (2019), but the impact of aerosol heterogeneous reactions is a bit larger, which may reflect differences in surface area density fields and the uptake coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on organic carbon, sea salt and sulfate surface. Neglecting the full impact of heterogeneous reactions results in a 5.8 % increase in [OH]<sub>gm</sub> and 5.2 % decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime.</p>
      <p id="d2e5244">The radical terminating, termolecular reaction between OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exerts substantial influence on the lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and on tropospheric OH. However, there is uncertainty over the reaction pathways involved, and recent kinetic recommendations have distinguished the dominant pathway forming nitric acid and a secondary pathway forming HOONO (e.g., Burkholder et al., 2020). Models not representing HOONO may consider this species to behave as nitric acid or to decompose rapidly to OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In our control run we have assumed the former, using the recent assessments of the rate coefficients of Amedro et al. (2019, 2020), supported by the study of Rolletter et al. (2025). In our JPL run we have assumed the latter, using rate coefficients for the pathway forming nitric acid only (Burkholder et al., 2020). As Fig. 7f shows, the faster rate coefficient in the control run than in the JPL run leads to an 8 % decrease in tropospheric OH concentration, especially in the upper troposphere and at high latitudes. The control simulation, which uses this faster rate coefficient, already slightly overestimates observed OH shown in Fig. 5; therefore, use of the slower JPL rate coefficient would further increase simulated OH levels and would increase this positive bias. Global mean [OH]<sub>gm</sub> decreases by 7 %, leading to an 8.4 % increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Tropospheric OH budgets</title>
      <p id="d2e5308">In this section, we quantify the factors affecting the major sources and sinks of OH. The primary source of OH is the photolysis of ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at wavelengths less than 330 nm, which produces electronically excited oxygen atoms (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Some of these atoms subsequently react with water vapor to form OH. In the control run (CTL, Table 4), this pathway accounts for 92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or 44 % of total OH production – closely matching estimates from Lelieveld et al. (2016) and Bossolasco et al. (2025). Other significant production pathways include the reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with NO (33 %), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (13 %), and photolysis of hydrogen peroxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 8 %). Minor contributions arise from photolysis of VOCs and organic hydroperoxides (ROOH), as well as other trace pathways. On the loss side, the dominant sink is the reaction of OH with carbon monoxide (CO), contributing to 41 % of total OH removal in the control run. This is consistent with the contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % reported by Fiore et al. (2024). Additional important sinks include reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15 %), non-methane VOCs and ROOH (15 %), and aldehydes (RCHO, 8 %). Reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> account for 7 %, while minor reactions contribute the remaining 14 %.</p>

<table-wrap id="T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e5452">Main reactions leading to tropospheric production and loss of OH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and their relative contribution (%) in seven experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">fixEmis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">noWVA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">noCloud</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">noAero</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">noHete</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">JPL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Production</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">92 (44 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">91 (44 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">96 (45 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">92 (44 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">92 (43 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">93 (43 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">95 (44 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">68 (33 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">67 (33 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">69 (32 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">70 (33 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">71 (33 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">72 (33 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">72 (33 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26 (13 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26 (13 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26 (12 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27 (13 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28 (13 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29 (13 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">28 (13 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18 (9 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19 (9 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VOCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ROOH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.1 (2.0 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.9 (1.9 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.2 (1.9 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.1 (1.9 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.1 (1.9 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.1 (1.9 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.0 (1.8 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4 (0.2 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3 (0.2 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3 (0.2 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3 (0.2 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4 (0.2 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.4 (0.2 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.3 (0.2 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">208</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">205</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">213</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">210</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">214</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">217</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">217</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Loss</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">86 (41 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">84 (41 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">87 (41 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">87 (41 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">87 (41 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">88 (40 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">88 (41 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32 (16 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33 (16 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">34 (16 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VOCs</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ROOH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">32 (15 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RCHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">17 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18 (8 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11 (6 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11 (6 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 (5 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 (6 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12 (6 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12 (6 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13 (6 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.3 (1.1 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.2 (1.1 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.3 (1.1 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.3 (1.1 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.4 (1.1 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.5 (1.1 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.1 (1.0 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 (14 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28 (14 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29 (14 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29 (14 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 (14 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31 (14 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30 (14 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">208</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">205</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">213</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">210</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">214</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">217</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">217</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e6180">Comparison of the fixEmis run with the control run indicates that the variation in emissions from year to year has a relatively minor impact on OH production and loss. Neglecting UV absorption by water vapor (noWVA) results in 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater OH production via the primary pathway <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because more UV radiation is available for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis and subsequent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production. Heterogeneous reactions significantly influence the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pathways, increasing production by approximately 4 and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. However, their relative contributions to total OH production remain largely unchanged. Neglecting the HOONO channel associated with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction results in a modest decrease in OH loss, from 2.3 to 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Despite its small contribution to the global OH loss budget, this change perturbs the coupled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry and enhances radical recycling, leading to a larger response in the steady-state OH abundance. This reduction contributes to net OH accumulation, increasing total OH production from 208 to 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, primarily through the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pathways. Overall, the sensitivity experiments highlight the key atmospheric processes influencing OH levels and allow quantification of their respective impacts, while the OH budget analysis reveals the chemical pathways through which these processes affect OH production and loss.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Impact of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions</title>
      <p id="d2e6476">Previous studies have indicated that oceanic emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent a missing sink of OH in current chemistry-climate models (Wang et al., 2019). Due to the limited measurement data and large uncertainty in these emissions, we conducted two additional short simulation experiments to assess their impacts on [OH]<sub>gm</sub>. Figure 8 shows the vertical distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured over the remote Pacific during the ATom campaigns, as well as model mixing ratios sampled along the flight tracks. Without oceanic emissions (CTL run), the model underestimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by up to an order of magnitude in the boundary layer and free troposphere (see Fig. 8). By including oceanic emissions, simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the marine boundary layer is greatly improved, with the mean bias reduced from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv, especially in spring and summer. However, the subsequent impact in the free troposphere is relatively limited, indicating that an additional missing chemical source likely exists there, as suggested by Wang et al. (2019).</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e6563">As Fig. 5, but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (pptv). The model control run (CTL) is shown in green, with results from model runs using emissions from CESM and GEOS-Chem shown in red and blue respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T5" specific-use="star"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d2e6589">The annual mean global emissions and burdens of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, [OH]<sub>gm</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  during 2016–2017 from ALD-cesm and ALD-geoc runs.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Millet et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ALD-cesm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ALD-geoc</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ocean emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">/</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">62.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">69.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">90.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden (Tg)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[OH]<sub>gm</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">/</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.78</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (years)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">/</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.98</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e6874">As shown in Table 5, including oceanic emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases its global burden from 0.32 to 0.38 Tg (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) in the ALD-cesm run, and to 0.42 Tg (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) in the ALD-geoc run – bringing the simulated values into much closer agreement with previous estimates (e.g. Millet et al., 2010), and thereby improving confidence in the representation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources in the model. This increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to a decrease in the global mean OH concentration of up to 1.5 % and an increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime up to 9.98 years (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Overall, while current estimates of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions slightly decrease global mean OH concentration and marginally increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime, their impact appears limited. Nonetheless, incorporating more reliable oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission estimates and improving the representation of its sources in the free troposphere may lead to a stronger impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on [OH]<sub>gm</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CH4</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Tropospheric OH column trends</title>
      <p id="d2e7037">The annual and seasonal distribution of tropospheric column OH exhibits substantial spatial and seasonal heterogeneity (Fig. 9). In summer, the highest columns are located at low and mid latitudes in the northern hemisphere, while in winter they shift to the southern hemisphere. Maxima are primarily located in the Northern Hemisphere in regions where anthropogenic emissions dominate the high OH production (e.g., India, China, Southeast Asia, and Central America). Regions of high tropospheric OH column are primarily associated with elevated levels of OH precursors, particularly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, together with favorable photochemical conditions, and the short lifetime of OH further confines its distribution and limits long-range transport (Duncan et al., 2016; Chua et al., 2023). Over tropical oceans, there are relatively high columns which may be attributed to high primary production and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shipping emissions, as evidenced by column maxima along shipping lanes between Sri Lanka and Malaysia (Richter et al., 2004). Another broad column maximum extends across the Atlantic Ocean, a likely result of influence from African and South American biomass burning.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e7064">The tropospheric column of OH (TCOH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, left panels) and the trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, right panels) in annual, winter and summer from 2000 to 2017. The troposphere was defined as the region below a climatological tropopause (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">215</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>lat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) following Lawrence et al. (2001). Trends are calculated as in Fig. 2. The value in the right corner is the global average.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e7173">The trends in the annual tropospheric OH column also exhibit large spatial heterogeneity (Fig. 9, right panels). Increases in OH of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominate over most of the world, particularly over India and China where they exceed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.6 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), although there are spatially extensive regions with decreasing OH, typically of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly over central Africa, the tropical Atlantic and Indian Oceans where the decrease exceeds 1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The strong positive trend over India is consistent with Souri et al. (2024), who also identified India as a major region of increasing tropospheric OH associated with rising <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, Souri et al. (2024) found decreasing OH over the North China Plain after 2011 in response to recent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reductions, in contrast to the broader positive trend over China simulated here. This difference likely reflects, in part, the different analysis periods and treatment of recent emission changes. When averaged globally, these regional distinctions are lost, and there is a net increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Over India and China, the increases are significant and are closely linked to the increased emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and other <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors (Hou et al., 2023b), although small increases are still seen in the fixed-emission experiment (Fig. S8). Over tropical Africa there are decreases in OH whether or not emission changes are considered (Figs. 9 and S8), suggesting that they arise from changes in meteorology rather than emissions. However, we note that the modelled positive trend in CO column and the underestimated positive trend in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column in this region may lead to an overestimation of the decreases in OH over Africa and the tropical oceans.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Contributions of Selected Atmospheric Processes to Tropospheric OH Variability and Trends</title>
      <p id="d2e7442">We quantify the relative contributions of key factors to changes in annual global mean OH over time by comparing sensitivity simulations with the control run. Meteorological effects are estimated using simulations with fixed emissions, which isolate variability driven by meteorology. The control simulation is used as a reference to represent the combined influence of all processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e7445">Most observational estimates based on methyl chloroform (MCF) indicate a decrease in global mean OH from about 2005 (Rigby et al., 2017) but estimates from several model-based studies suggest an increase over this period (Stevenson et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020). Our simulated OH shows relatively little change from 2000 to 2017, with a small net increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (6.8 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the multiyear global mean OH, see Table 6 and Fig. 10c). In summer, the increases are largest at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and are significant. With emissions fixed at 2000 levels, OH increases more strongly, by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating an important contribution from interannual changes in meteorology. These may affect OH through changes in temperature, water vapour, clouds and photolysis, although their individual contributions are not isolated in the present experiments. In autumn and winter, the OH increase by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, but these increases are not statistically significant.</p>

<table-wrap id="T6" specific-use="star"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d2e7653">Annual and seasonal [OH]<sub>gm</sub> trends (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in seven simulation experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">fixEmis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">noWVA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">noCloud</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">noAero</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">noHete</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">JPL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Annual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.79</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(0.21–1.25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(1.20–2.18)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(0.39–1.28)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(0.26–1.29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(0.12–1.18)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.21–1.22)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(0.19–1.29)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.72<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.70<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.72<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.73<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.69)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(0.77–1.91)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.66)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.75)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.65)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.78)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.80)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(0.20–2.25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(1.52–2.80)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(0.36–2.38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(0.26–2.21)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(0.15–2.14)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(0.20–2.12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(0.16–2.42)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Autumn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.52<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.55<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.63<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.45<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.54<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.51<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.76)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(0.40–2.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.89)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.84)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.73)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.85)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2.01)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.32<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.43<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.35<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.05)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(0.91–2.13)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.09)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.09)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.01)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.09)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e7704">Note: Trends are calculated using the Theil–Sen method, with 90 % confidence intervals shown in parentheses. Trends with <sup>a</sup> are not significant at a 90 % level using the Mann–Kendall test, but are at an 80 % level. <sup>b</sup> Trends that are not significant at an 80 % level.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e8383"><bold>(a)</bold> The anomaly of [OH]<sub>gm</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the control run (CTL) and fixed emission run (labelled “Mete”), <bold>(b)</bold> the relative differences in annual mean [OH]<sub>gm</sub> (%) between CTL and the respective sensitivity runs, averaged over 2000–2017, and <bold>(c)</bold> the relative [OH]<sub>gm</sub> anomalies (%) from this work (FRSGC/UCI) and other studies. The labels in panel <bold>(b)</bold> match those in Fig. 7. Results based on the MOZART and GEOS-Chem chemical mechanisms in panel <bold>(c)</bold> are from Zhao et al. (2025), the MCF-based inversion estimates are from Patra et al. (2021) and Naus et al. (2019), and the HFC-based inversion estimates are from Thompson et al. (2024).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13767/2026/acp-26-13767-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e8464">As shown in Fig. 10a, global mean OH in the control run exhibits clear interannual variability, with particularly pronounced decreases in 2002 and 2015 and increases in 2007 and 2016, alongside other year-to-year variations over the study period. Interannual variability is also evident in the fixed-emission simulation, further indicating a role for meteorological variability in year-to-year changes in OH. The 2007 increase can be attributed to a decrease in fire-related CO emissions from 2006 to 2007 associated with the La Niña event (Fig. S3; Zhao et al., 2025). This reduction in CO emissions led to lower global CO concentrations, thereby decreasing OH consumption via the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction pathway. In contrast, both 2002 and 2015 experienced elevated fire emissions – particularly in 2015 – driven by intensified tropical wildfires linked to El Niño events, resulting in increased atmospheric CO and enhanced OH loss. Consistent with this relationship, annual anomalies in global mean OH are negatively correlated with anomalies in fire-related CO emissions over 2000–2017 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), although uncertainties remain in the CO emission inventory used here. These fire-emission-related features are not evident in the fixed-emission run, further supporting the influence of interannual variability in fire-related CO emissions on OH.</p>
      <p id="d2e8495">The processes examined in this study primarily affect the absolute global abundance of OH, while their effects on the simulated OH trend over 2000–2017 are relatively small. Several of these processes reduce global mean OH and therefore reduce the high-OH tendency commonly reported in global models (Shindell et al., 2006; Fiore et al., 2009; Naik et al., 2013), although the accuracy of the modelled OH trend remains uncertain. As shown in Table 6 and Fig. 10, water vapor UV absorption reduces global mean OH by 3.6 % and slightly weakens its increase. Heterogeneous chemistry on clouds decreases OH by 2.4 %. Because cloud ice surface area density varies with meteorological conditions and shows a small increase during 2000–2017, cloud heterogeneous chemistry may also suppress the positive OH trend slightly. Aerosol heterogeneous chemistry has a somewhat larger effect on mean OH, reducing it by 3.2 %, but has little influence on the OH trend here because the prescribed aerosol surface area density does not capture interannual changes in aerosol abundance. The combined heterogeneous effect reduces global mean OH by 5.8 %, with the change in the OH trend arising primarily from cloud heterogeneous chemistry. The updated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction rate used in the control run also reduces global mean OH by about 7 %, while having only a small effect on the simulated trend. Although the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction contributes only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to total OH loss, this sensitivity reflects nonlinear adjustments in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry and radical recycling.</p>
      <p id="d2e8564">Tropospheric OH variations in Fig. 10c calculated using the FRSGC/UCI control run from 2005 to 2017 are compared with those derived from the MOZART and GEOS-Chem models as reported by Zhao et al. (2025) who estimated OH variations using an observation- and model-driven approach with chemical mechanisms based on MOZART and GEOS-Chem. Also shown in Fig. 10c are MCF-based inversions from the 3D model outlined by Patra et al. (2021) and Naus et al. (2019), as well as the HFC-based inversions from the box model described by Thompson et al. (2024). Despite substantial differences in the magnitude of year-to-year variability, these independent approaches show several common temporal features, including enhanced OH around 2012–2013 and lower values during 2014–2015. Our model control simulation exhibits relatively smooth OH variations, with smaller year-to-year fluctuations than most of the inversion estimates, while still capturing some of these common temporal features. In contrast, the MCF-based inversions generally exhibit larger fluctuations than the chemistry transport models and HFC-based inversions, highlighting the sensitivity of inferred OH variability to observational constraints and inversion frameworks. Taken together, the comparison suggests that global tropospheric OH over this period is characterized primarily by interannual variability rather than a persistent long-term change. The agreement in the timing of OH anomalies, despite differences in their amplitudes, provides some confidence that these variations reflect real large-scale changes, while the spread among estimates remains an important measure of uncertainty.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e8577">This study has analyzed the distribution and evolution of tropospheric OH and of its sensitivity to key factors from 2000 to 2017 using an updated version of the FRSGC/UCI global chemistry transport model. The model reproduces the observed distribution and interannual changes in the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column well but does not capture the observed decrease in the CO column. This mismatch in the CO trend may lead to an underestimation of any increase or overestimation of any decrease in OH concentrations over the 2000–2017 period. The model captures the vertical profile of OH relatively well in oceanic regions, although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is overestimated in the mid troposphere, highlighting potential chemical biases or weaknesses in emissions estimates.</p>
      <p id="d2e8613">Airmass-weighted OH concentrations and methane lifetimes in this study are within the range of observationally constrained and multi-model estimates. There are relatively high OH concentrations between 30° S and 30° N in the lower to middle troposphere, with largest values in the northern hemisphere. The contributions of water vapor absorption and heterogeneous reactions on aerosol decrease with altitude, while the effect of heterogeneous reactions on cloud droplets peaks in the upper troposphere. The faster rate coefficient for the termolecular reaction between OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> used in the control run leads to a 7 % decrease in global tropospheric OH, with the largest effects in the upper troposphere and at high latitudes. UV absorption by water vapor results in a 4.3 % decrease in OH production via the primary pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Heterogeneous reactions reduce OH concentrations by suppressing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pathways, primarily through the depletion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the alteration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning, both of which are closely linked to ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels.</p>
      <p id="d2e8737">The tropospheric OH column exhibits substantial spatial and seasonal variability and shows a significant positive trend over most regions of the globe. The largest increases are found over India and China, exceeding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) which can principally be attributed to the increase in anthropogenic emissions. In contrast, decreases in the OH column are evident over tropical regions, approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly in tropical Africa, the tropical Atlantic and the Indian Ocean where decreases exceed 1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These decreases are influenced by changes in meteorological conditions, while the mismatch in the simulated CO trend introduces additional uncertainty into the simulated OH trend. The annual trend in global mean OH exhibits a weak but statistically significant positive trend, particularly in summer, averaging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is likely associated with changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. Meteorological variability contributes to a more significant annual increase in global mean OH of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e8963">While water vapor UV absorption and heterogeneous reactions have a limited influence on the interannual variability of global mean OH, they substantially affect its absolute level. Specifically, water vapor UV absorption reduces global mean OH by 3.6 %, increasing the methane lifetime by 4.2 %. The combined influence of cloud- and aerosol-related heterogeneous processes leads to an overall 5.8 % decrease in global mean OH. Incorporating these processes reduces the simulated OH levels and alters methane lifetime, while having little effect on the OH trend. The 7 % decrease of OH by faster <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction induces an 8.4 % change in methane lifetime, underscoring the importance of accurately representing termolecular reaction kinetics. Oceanic acetaldehyde emissions (40–63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) lead to modest reductions in OH (0.9 %–1.5 %) and increases in methane lifetime (1.0 %–1.6 %), highlighting the role of biogenic source uncertainties. Together, these results suggest that improved representation of the processes examined here can help reduce the tendency of global models to overestimate OH and underestimate methane lifetimes, although these processes alone cannot fully account for this bias. The model configuration used here does not include halogen chemistry, which can influence tropospheric OH and may provide an additional pathway for reducing this bias. In this study, the large sensitivity to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction rate highlights the need to better constrain its kinetics, while the effects of oceanic acetaldehyde emphasize the need for improved constraints on marine emissions. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UV absorption and heterogeneous chemistry, more consistent implementation of current process understanding across global models would help reduce structural differences in simulated OH. Overall, improving OH representation requires both tighter constraints on uncertain kinetics and emissions and broader incorporation of currently understood processes into global models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e9034">The monthly mean model outputs used in this study are publicly available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19112214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19112214</ext-link> (Hou, 2026). The Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument/Microwave Limb Sounder (OMI/MLS) tropospheric ozone dataset was obtained from <uri>https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data_services/cloud_slice/new_data.html</uri> (last access: 20 August 2026). Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column data from OMI QA4ECV version 1.1 for the period 2005–2017 were provided by the Tropospheric Emission Monitoring Internet Service (TEMIS; <uri>https://www.temis.nl/</uri>, last access: 20 August 2026). MOPITT-derived CO (Near- and Thermal-Infrared Radiances), version 9 (V009), for 2001–2017 were obtained from the NASA Earthdata archive (<uri>https://asdc.larc.nasa.gov/project/MOPITT</uri>, last access: 20 August 2026). The gridded Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR) global database is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.880506" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.880506</ext-link> (Schultz et al., 2017a). Vertical profiles of OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) were obtained from the NASA Earthdata archive (<uri>https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/catalog/ornl-cloud-atom-merge-v2-1925-2.0</uri>, last access: 20 August 2026).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e9091">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13767-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13767-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e9100">XH, RH and OW designed the study. RH processed the emission inventories. XH, RH, OW and AM updated model code. RJP and XH created codes to compare model outputs with satellite data using averaging kernels. XH ran model simulations and performed the analysis. XH and RH prepared the paper with contributions from all co-authors. SW provided seawater acetaldehyde concentrations and guidance for configuring the CESM2 simulations. XH and YW conducted CESM2 and GEOS-Chem model runs to generate oceanic acetaldehyde emissions. YZ contributed OH anomaly data derived from MOZART and the GEOS-Chem chemical mechanisms. OW, JL, BZ, TZ and AKP discussed the results and offered valuable comments.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e9106">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e9115">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e9121">We acknowledge the use of the High-End Computing (HEC) high performance and high throughput computing resources at Lancaster University, UK, as well as additional computational support from High-Performance Computing Center at Nanjing University of Information Science &amp; Technology, China. We gratefully acknowledge the use of satellite observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from OMI/MLS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from OMI QA4ECV, and CO from MOPITT, surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations from the TOAR database, and aircraft observations of OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the ATom missions. We thank the teams and investigators involved in producing, maintaining, and making these observational datasets available. We also thank Louisa Emmons from the NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research for valuable advice on the implementation and operation of the CESM2-OASISS module (<uri>https://wiki.ucar.edu/spaces/camchem/pages/358319521/Online Air-Sea Interface for Soluble Species OASISS</uri>, last access:  19 September 2026).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e9187">XH is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2022YFC3701204). RH and XH are supported by the NERC grant LSO3 (NE/V011863/1). RH and AM are supported by the NERC InHALE grant (NE/X003582/). RP was funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) by providing funding for the National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO, award reference NE/R016518/1).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e9193">This paper was edited by Bryan N. Duncan and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Allen, D. J. and Pickering, K. E.: Evaluation of lightning flash rate parameterizations for use in a global chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4711, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002066</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Amedro, D., Bunkan, A. J. C., Berasategui, M., and Crowley, J. N.: Kinetics of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction: rate coefficients (217–333 K, 16–1200 mbar) and fall-off parameters for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bath gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10643–10657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10643-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-10643-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Amedro, D., Berasategui, M., Bunkan, A. J. C., Pozzer, A., Lelieveld, J., and Crowley, J. N.: Kinetics of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction: effect of water vapour and new parameterization for global modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3091–3105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3091-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3091-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Fiore, A. M., Baublitz, C. B., Follette-Cook, M. B., Nicely, J. M., and Wolfe, G. M.: Spatial and temporal variability in the hydroxyl (OH) radical: understanding the role of large-scale climate features and their influence on OH through its dynamical and photochemical drivers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6481–6508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6481-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6481-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Liu, J., Nicely, J. M., Strode, S. A., Follette-Cook, M. B., Souri, A. H., Ziemke, J. R., González-Abad, G., and Ayazpour, Z.: Trends and interannual variability of the hydroxyl radical in the remote tropics during boreal autumn inferred from satellite proxy data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2024GL108531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024GL108531</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Archibald, A. T., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Archer-Nicholls, S., Chipperfield, M. P., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Dennison, F., Dhomse, S. S., Griffiths, P. T., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Hill, R. S., Johnson, C. E., Keeble, J., Köhler, M. O., Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J. P., Ordóñez, C., Pope, R. J., Rumbold, S. T., Russo, M. R., Savage, N. H., Sellar, A., Stringer, M., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., and Zeng, G.: Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1223–1266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Zara, M., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., Maasakkers, J. D., van der A, R. J., Nightingale, J., De Rudder, A., Irie, H., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., and Compernolle, S. C.: Improving algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals: results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables (QA4ECV) project, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6651–6678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bossolasco, A., Fernandez, R. P., Li, Q., Mahajan, A. S., Villamayor, J., Barrera, J. A., Heard, D. E., Cuevas, C. A., Caram, C., Szopaj, S., and Saiz-Lopez, A.: Key role of short-lived halogens on global atmospheric oxidation during historical periods, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 5, 547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ea00141a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d4ea00141a</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bozzo, A., Benedetti, A., Flemming, J., Kipling, Z., and Rémy, S.: An aerosol climatology for global models based on the tropospheric aerosol scheme in the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1007–1034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1007-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-1007-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Brasseur, G. P. and Solomon, S.: Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere, Springer Netherlands, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3824-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/1-4020-3824-0</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Brune, W. H., Miller, D. O., Thames, A. B., Allen, H. M., Apel, E. C., Blake, D. R., Bui, T. P., Commane, R., Crounse, J. D., Daube, B. C., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Elkins, J. W., Hall, S. R., Hanisco, T. F., Hannun, R. A., Hintsa, E. J., Hornbrook, R. S., Kim, M. J., McKain, K., Moore, F. L., Neuman, J. A., Nicely, J. M., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., St. Clair, J. M., Sweeney, C., Teng, A. P., Thompson, C., Ullmann, K., Veres, P. R., Wennberg, P. O., and Wolfe, G. M.: Exploring Oxidation in the Remote Free Troposphere: Insights From Atmospheric Tomography (ATom), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031685" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031685</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Cappa, C., Crounse, J. D., Dibble, T. S., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Percival, C. J., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P. H.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 19, JPL Publication 19-5, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, <uri>https://dataverse.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:2014/49199&amp;version=2.1</uri> (last access: 25 September 2026), 1 May 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Cantrell, C. A., Shetter, R. E., Gilpin, T. M., Calvert, J. G., Eisele, F. L., and Tanner, D. J.: Peroxy radical concentrations measured and calculated from trace gas measurements in the Mauna Loa observatory photochemistry experiment 2, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 14653–14664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03613" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD03613</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Christian, K. E., Brune, W. H., Mao, J., and Ren, X.: Global sensitivity analysis of GEOS-Chem modeled ozone and hydrogen oxides during the INTEX campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2443–2460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2443-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2443-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Chua, G., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.: Exploring the drivers of tropospheric hydroxyl radical trends in the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory AM4.1 atmospheric chemistry–climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4955–4975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4955-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-4955-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Chua, G., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.: Role of future climate change, air pollution control and methane mitigation in driving hydroxyl radical (OH) and methane lifetime, Geophys. Res. Lett., 53, e2025GL120136, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Compernolle, S., Verhoelst, T., Pinardi, G., Granville, J., Hubert, D., Keppens, A., Niemeijer, S., Rino, B., Bais, A., Beirle, S., Boersma, F., Burrows, J. P., De Smedt, I., Eskes, H., Goutail, F., Hendrick, F., Lorente, A., Pazmino, A., Piters, A., Peters, E., Pommereau, J.-P., Remmers, J., Richter, A., van Geffen, J., Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., and Lambert, J.-C.: Validation of Aura-OMI QA4ECV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> climate data records with ground-based DOAS networks: the role of measurement and comparison uncertainties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8017–8045, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8017-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-8017-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J.: The Role of NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Chemistry of the Troposphere and Stratosphere, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 7, 443–472, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Deeter, M., Francis, G., Gille, J., Mao, D., Martínez-Alonso, S., Worden, H., Ziskin, D., Drummond, J., Commane, R., Diskin, G., and McKain, K.: The MOPITT Version 9 CO product: sampling enhancements and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2325–2344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2325-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-2325-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Duncan, B. N., Lamsal, L. N., Thompson, A. M., Yoshida, Y., Lu, Z. F., Streets, D. G., Hurwitz, M. M., and Pickering, K. E.: A space-based, high-resolution view of notable changes in urban <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution around the world (2005–2014), J. Geophys. Res., 121, 976–996, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd024121</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Elshorbany, Y., Ziemke, J. R., Strode, S., Petetin, H., Miyazaki, K., De Smedt, I., Pickering, K., Seguel, R. J., Worden, H., Emmerichs, T., Taraborrelli, D., Cazorla, M., Fadnavis, S., Buchholz, R. R., Gaubert, B., Rojas, N. Y., Nogueira, T., Salameh, T., and Huang, M.: Tropospheric ozone precursors: global and regional distributions, trends, and variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12225–12257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12225-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-12225-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Emmons, L. K., Schwantes, R. H., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G., Kinnison, D., Lamarque, J., Marsh, D., Mills, M. J., Tilmes, S., Bardeen, C., Buchholz, R. R., Conley, A., Gettelman, A., Garcia, R., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., and Pétron, G.: The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001882, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001882" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001882</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Fei, D. D., Hou, X. W., and Wei, L.: Quantitative sources of global surface ozone and spatial and temporal distribution characteristics, China Environmental Science, 41, 3004–3016, <uri>https://link.oversea.cnki.net/doi/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2021.0302</uri> (last access: 25 September 2026), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., Dentener, F. J., Wild, O., Cuvelier, C., Schultz, M. G., Hess, P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., Doherty, R. M., Horowitz, L. W., MacKenzie, A., Sanderson, M. G., Shindell, D. T., Stevenson, D. S., Szopa, S., Van Dingenen, R., Zeng, G., Atherton, C., Bergmann, D., Bey, I., Carmichael, G., Collins, W. J., Duncan, B. N., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G., Gauss, M., Gong, S., Hauglustaine, D., Holloway, T., Isaksen, I. S. A., Jacob, D. J., Jonson, J. E., Kaminski, J. W., Keating, T. J., Lupu, A., Marmer, E., Montanaro, V., Park, R. J., Pitari, G., Pringle, K. J., Pyle, J. A., Schroeder, S., Vivanco, M. G., Wind, P., Wojcik, G., Wu, S., and Zuber, A.: Multimodel estimates of intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D04301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010816</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., Mickley, L. J., Zhu, Q., and Baublitz, C. B.: Climate and Tropospheric Oxidizing Capacity, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 52, 11.1–11.29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-090307" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-090307</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Gaubert, B., Emmons, L. K., Raeder, K., Tilmes, S., Miyazaki, K., Arellano Jr., A. F., Elguindi, N., Granier, C., Tang, W., Barré, J., Worden, H. M., Buchholz, R. R., Edwards, D. P., Franke, P., Anderson, J. L., Saunois, M., Schroeder, J., Woo, J.-H., Simpson, I. J., Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J., Teng, A., Kim, M., Dickerson, R. R., He, H., Ren, X., Pusede, S. E., and Diskin, G. S.: Correcting model biases of CO in East Asia: impact on oxidant distributions during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14617–14647, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14617-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-14617-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Granier, C., Guether, A., Lamarque, J. F., Mieville, A., Muller, J. F., Olivier, J., Orlando, J., Peters, J., Petron, G., Tyndall, G., and Wallens, S.: POET, a database of surface emissions of ozone precursors, <uri>https://eccad.aeris-data.fr</uri> (last access: 19 September 2026), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Granier, C., Darras, S., Denier van der Gon, H., Doubalova, J., Elguindi, N., Galle, B., Gauss, M., Guevara, M., Jalkanen, J.-P., Kuenen, J., Liousse, C., Quack, B., Simpson, D., and Sindelarova, K.: The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service global and regional emissions (April 2019 version), Report April 2019 version, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24380/d0bn-kx16" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24380/d0bn-kx16</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Griffiths, P. T., Murray, L. T., Zeng, G., Shin, Y. M., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Deushi, M., Emmons, L. K., Galbally, I. E., Hassler, B., Horowitz, L. W., Keeble, J., Liu, J., Moeini, O., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Oshima, N., Tarasick, D., Tilmes, S., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., Young, P. J., and Zanis, P.: Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4187–4218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Ha, P. T. M., Matsuda, R., Kanaya, Y., Taketani, F., and Sudo, K.: Effects of heterogeneous reactions on tropospheric chemistry: a global simulation with the chemistry–climate model CHASER V4.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3813–3841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3813-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-3813-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Heymsfield, A., Winker D., Avery, M., Vaughan, M., Diskin, G., Deng, M., Mitev, V., and Matthey R.: Relationships between Ice Water Content and Volume Extinction Coefficient from In Situ Observations for Temperatures from 0° to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: Implications for Spaceborne Lidar Retrievals, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 479–505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-087.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAMC-D-13-087.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Prather, M. J., Søvde, O. A., and Myhre, G.: Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 285–302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-285-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-285-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Bertram, T. H., Confer, K. L., Graham, K. A., Ronan, A. C., Wirks, C. K., and Shah, V.: The role of clouds in the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle: A new modelling approach for cloud chemistry and its global implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4980–4990, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL081990" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL081990</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hou, X., Wild, O., Zhu, B., and Lee, J.: Future tropospheric ozone budget and distribution over east Asia under a net-zero scenario, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15395–15411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15395-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-15395-2023</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Hou, X., Zhang, Y., Lv, X., and Lee, J.: The Impact of Meteorological Conditions and Emissions on Tropospheric Column Ozone Trends in Recent Years, Remote Sens.-Basel, 15, 5293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs15225293</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hou, X.: Model outputs for “Tropospheric OH and Its Trends: New Insight into Atmospheric Processes and Implications for Methane Lifetime”, Version v1, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19112214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19112214</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation> Jacob, D. J.: Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2131–2159, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, Z., Zhu, R., Miyazaki, K., McDonald, B. C., Klimont, Z., Zheng, B., Boersma, K. F., Zhang, Q., Worden, H., Worden, J. R., Henze, D. K., Jones, D. B. A., van der Gon, H. A. C. D., and Eskes, H.: Decadal variabilities in tropospheric nitrogen oxides over United States, Europe, and China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035872" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD035872</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation> Kendall, M. G.: Rank Correlation Methods, 4th edn., Charles Griffin, London, ISBN 9780852641996, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, M. G., Jöckel, P., and von Kuhlmann, R.: What does the global mean OH concentration tell us?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 1, 37–49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-1-37-2001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-1-37-2001</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Strode, S. A., Liang, Q., Oman, L. D., Colarco, P. R., Fleming, E. L., Manyin, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Ziemke, J. R., Lamsal, L. N., and Li, C.: Change in tropospheric ozone in the recent decades and its contribution to global total ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JD037170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD037170</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Liu, M., Song, Y., Matsui, H., Shang, F., Kang, L., Cai, X., Zhang, H., and Zhu, T.: Enhanced atmospheric oxidation toward carbon neutrality reduces methane's climate forcing, Nat. Commun., 15, 3148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47436-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-024-47436-9</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Logan, J. A., Prather, M. J., Wofsy, S. C., and McElroy, M. B.: Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 7210–7254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC08p07210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC086iC08p07210</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Macintyre, H. L. and Evans, M. J.: Sensitivity of a global model to the uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by tropospheric aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7409–7414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7409-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7409-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>McNorton, J., Chipperfield, M. P., Gloor, M., Wilson, C., Feng, W., Hayman, G. D., Rigby, M., Krummel, P. B., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., Young, D., Dlugokencky, E., and Montzka, S. A.: Role of OH variability in the stalling of the global atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> growth rate from 1999 to 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7943–7956, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7943-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7943-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Mann, H. B.: Nonparametric tests against trend, Econometrica, 13, 245–259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/1907187</ext-link>, 1945.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Meinshausen, M., Vogel, E., Nauels, A., Lorbacher, K., Meinshausen, N., Etheridge, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Montzka, S. A., Rayner, P. J., Trudinger, C. M., Krummel, P. B., Beyerle, U., Canadell, J. G., Daniel, J. S., Enting, I. G., Law, R. M., Lunder, C. R., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Reimann, S., Rubino, M., Velders, G. J. M., Vollmer, M. K., Wang, R. H. J., and Weiss, R.: Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2057–2116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2057-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-2057-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Millet, D. B., Guenther, A., Siegel, D. A., Nelson, N. B., Singh, H. B., de Gouw, J. A., Warneke, C., Williams, J., Eerdekens, G., Sinha, V., Karl, T., Flocke, F., Apel, E., Riemer, D. D., Palmer, P. I., and Barkley, M.: Global atmospheric budget of acetaldehyde: 3-D model analysis and constraints from in-situ and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3405–3425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3405-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3405-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H., Sudo, K., Boersma, K. F., Bowman, K., and Kanaya, Y.: Decadal changes in global surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from multi-constituent satellite data assimilation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 807–837, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-807-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Monks, S. A., Arnold, S. R., Hollaway, M. J., Pope, R. J., Wilson, C., Feng, W., Emmerson, K. M., Kerridge, B. J., Latter, B. L., Miles, G. M., Siddans, R., and Chipperfield, M. P.: The TOMCAT global chemical transport model v1.6: description of chemical mechanism and model evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3025–3057, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3025-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-3025-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Montzka, S. A., Krol, M., Dlugokencky, E., Hall, B., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Small interannual variability of global atmospheric hydroxyl, Science, 331, 67–69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197640" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1197640</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Naik, V., Voulgarakis, A., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, M., Prather, M. J., Young, P. J., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P. J., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G. A., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., van Noije, T. P. C., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R., Shindell, D. T., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5277–5298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5277-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5277-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Naus, S., Montzka, S. A., Pandey, S., Basu, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Krol, M.: Constraints and biases in a tropospheric two-box model of OH, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 407–424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-407-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-407-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Newsome, B. and Evans, M.: Impact of uncertainties in inorganic chemical rate constants on tropospheric composition and ozone radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14333–14352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14333-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-14333-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Nicely, J. M., Salawitch, R. J., Canty, T., Anderson, D. C., Arnold, S. R., Chipperfield, M. P., Emmons, L. K., Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Kinnison, D. E., Lamarque, J.-F., Mao, J., Monks, S. A., Steenrod, S. D., Tilmes, S., and Turquety, S.: Quantifying the causes of differences in tropospheric OH within global models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 1983–2007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD026239</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Nicely, J. M., Duncan, B. N., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Salawitch, R. J., Deushi, M., Haslerud, A. S., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D. E., Klekociuk, A., Manyin, M. E., Marécal, V., Morgenstern, O., Murray, L. T., Myhre, G., Oman, L. D., Pitari, G., Pozzer, A., Quaglia, I., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Stone, K., Strahan, S., Tilmes, S., Tost, H., Westervelt, D. M., and Zeng, G.: A machine learning examination of hydroxyl radical differences among model simulations for CCMI-1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1341–1361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Patra, P. K., Krol, M. C., Montzka, S. A., Arnold, T., Atlas, E. L., Lintner, B. R., Stephens, B. B., Xiang, B., Elkins, J. W., Fraser, P. J., Ghosh, A., Hintsa, E. J., Hurst, D. F., Ishijima, K., Krummel, P. B., Miller, B. R., Miyazaki, K., Moore, F. L., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Steele, L. P., Takigawa, M., Wang, H. J., Weiss, R. F., Wofsy, S. C., and Young, D.: Observational evidence for interhemispheric hydroxyl-radical parity, Nature, 513, 219–223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13721</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Patra, P. K., Krol, M. C., Prinn, R. G., Takigawa, M., Mühle, J., Montzka, S. A., Lal, S., Yamashita, Y., Naus, S., Chandra, N., Weiss, R. F., Krummel, P. B., Fraser, P. J., O'Doherty, S., and Elkins, J. W.: Methyl Chloroform Continues to Constrain the Hydroxyl (OH) Variability in the Troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033862, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033862" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033862</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Phillips, D. P., Hopkins, F. E., Bell, T. G., Liss, P. S., Nightingale, P. D., Reeves, C. E., Wohl, C., and Yang, M.: Air–sea exchange of acetone, acetaldehyde, DMS and isoprene at a UK coastal site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10111–10132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10111-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-10111-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Pickering, K. E., Wang, Y., Tao, W.-K., Price, C., and Müller, J.-F.: Vertical distributions of lightning NOx for use in regional and global chemical transport models, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31203–31216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD02651</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Pimlott, M. A., Pope, R. J., Kerridge, B. J., Latter, B. G., Knappett, D. S., Heard, D. E., Ventress, L. J., Siddans, R., Feng, W., and Chipperfield, M. P.: Investigating the global OH radical distribution using steady-state approximations and satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10467–10488, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10467-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-10467-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Prather, M. J. and Zhu, L.: Resetting tropospheric OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime with ultraviolet <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption, Science, 385, 201–204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn0415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.adn0415</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Prather, M. J., Holmes, C. D., and Hsu, J.: Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: Systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051440" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL051440</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., Cunnold, D. M., Alyea, F. N., O'Doherty, S., Salameh, P., Miller, B. R., Huang, J., Wang, R. H. J., Hartley, D. E., Harth, C., Steele, L. P., Sturrock, G., Midgley, P. M., and McCulloch, A.: A history of chemically and radiatively important gases in air deduced from ALE/GAGE/AGAGE, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 17751–17792, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900141" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900141</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Prinn, R. G., Huang, J., Weiss, R. F., Cunnold, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., McCulloch, A., Harth, C., Reimann, S., Salameh, P., O'Doherty, S., Wang, R. H. J., Porter, L. W., Miller, B. R., and Krummel, P. B.: Evidence for variability of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals over the past quarter century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 07809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022228" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL022228</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Read, K. A., Carpenter, L. J., Arnold, S. R., Beale, R., Nightingale, P. D., Hopkins, J. R., Lewis, A. C., Lee, J. D., Mendes, L., and Pickering, S. J.: Multiannual observations of acetone, methanol, and acetaldehyde in remote Tropical Atlantic air: Implications for atmospheric OVOC budgets and oxidative capacity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 11028–11039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302082p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es302082p</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Richter, A., Eyring, V., Burrows, J. P., Bovensmann, H., Lauer, A., Sierk, B., and Crutzen, P. J.: Satellite measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from international shipping emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L23110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020822" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004gl020822</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Rigby, M., Montzka, S. A., Prinn, R. G., White, J. W. C., Young, D., O'Doherty, S., Lunt, M. F., Ganesan, A. L., Manning, A. J., Simmonds, P. G., Salameh, P. K., Harth, C. M., Mühle, J., Weiss, R. F., Fraser, P. J., Steele, L. P., Krummel, P. B., McCulloch, A., and Park, S.: Role of atmospheric oxidation in recent methane growth, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 5373–5377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616426114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616426114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Rolletter, M., Hofzumahaus, A., Novelli, A., Wahner, A., and Fuchs, H.: Kinetics of the reactions of OH with CO, NO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in air at 1 atm pressure, room temperature, and tropospheric water vapour concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3481–3502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3481-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-3481-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Schultz, M. G., Schröder, S., Lyapina, O., and Cooper, O. R.: Pre-compiled metrics data sets, links to gridded files in NetCDF format, PANGAEA [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.880506" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.880506</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Schultz, M. G., Schröder, S., Lyapina, O., Cooper, O. R., Galbally, I., Petropavlovskikh, I., von Schneidemesser, E., Tanimoto, H., Elshorbany, Y., Naja, M., Seguel, R. J., Dauert, U., Eckhardt, P., Feigenspahn, S., Fiebig, M., Hjellbrekke, A.-G., Hong, Y.-D., Kjeld, P. C., Koide, H., Lear, G., Tarasick, D., Ueno, M., Wallasch, M., Baumgardner, D., Chuang, M.-T., Gillett, R., Lee, M., Molloy, S., Moolla, R., Wang, T., Sharps, K., Adame, J. A., Ancellet, G., Apadula, F., Artaxo, P., Barlasina, M. E., Bogucka, M., Bonasoni, P., Chang, L., Colomb, A., Cuevas-Agulló, E., Cupeiro, M., Degórska, A., Ding, A., Fröhlich, M., Frolova, M., Gadhavi, H., Gheusi, F., Gilge, S., Gonzalez, M. Y., Gros, V., Hamad, S. H., Helmig, D., Henriques, D., Hermansen, O., Holla, R., Huber, J., Im, U., Jaffe, D. A., Komala, N., Kubistin, D., Lam, K.-S., Laurila, T., Lee, H., Levy, I., Mazzoleni, C., Mazzoleni, L. R., McClure-Begley, A., Mohamad, M., Murovec, M., Navarro-Comas, M., Nicodim, F., Parrish, D., Read, K. A., Reid, N., Ries, L., Saxena, P., Schwab, J. J., Scorgie, Y., Senik, I., Simmonds, P., Sinha, V., Skorokhod, A. I., Spain, G., Spangl, W., Spoor, R., Springston, S. R., Steer, K., Steinbacher, M., Suharguniyawan, E., Torre, P., Trickl, T., Weili, L., Weller, R., Xu, X., Xue, L., and Ma, Z.: The Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: database and metrics data of global surface ozone observations, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 5, 58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.244</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934</ext-link>, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Shindell, D. T., Faluvegi, G., Stevenson, D. S., Krol, M. C., Emmons, L. K., Lamarque, J.-F., Pétron, G., Dentener, F. J., Ellingsen, K., Schultz, M. G., Wild, O., Amann, M., Atherton, C. S., Bergmann, D. J., Bey, I., Butler, T., Cofala, J., Collins, W. J., Derwent, R. G., Doherty, R. M., Drevet, J., Eskes, H. J., Fiore, A. M., Gauss, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., Horowitz, L. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Lawrence, M. G., Montanaro, V., Müller, J.-F., Pitari, G., Prather, M. J., Pyle, J. A., Rast, S., Rodriguez, J. M., Sanderson, M. G., Savage, N. H., Strahan, S. E., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Unger, N., van Noije, T. P. C., and Zeng, G.: Multimodel simulations of carbon monoxide: Comparison with observations and projected near-future changes, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D19306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007100</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Simpson, D. and Darras, S.: Global soil NO emissions for Atmospheric Chemical Transport Modelling: CAMS-GLOB-SOIL v2.2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-2021-221</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Sindelarova, K., Markova, J., Simpson, D., Huszar, P., Karlicky, J., Darras, S., and Granier, C.: High-resolution biogenic global emission inventory for the time period 2000–2019 for air quality modelling, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 251–270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-251-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-14-251-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Soulie, A., Granier, C., Darras, S., Zilbermann, N., Doumbia, T., Guevara, M., Jalkanen, J.-P., Keita, S., Liousse, C., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Hoesly, R., and Smith, S. J.: Global anthropogenic emissions (CAMS-GLOB-ANT) for the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service simulations of air quality forecasts and reanalyses, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2261–2279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2261-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-16-2261-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Souri, A. H., Duncan, B. N., Strode, S. A., Anderson, D. C., Manyin, M. E., Liu, J., Oman, L. D., Zhang, Z., and Weir, B.: Enhancing long-term trend simulation of the global tropospheric hydroxyl (TOH) and its drivers from 2005 to 2019: a synergistic integration of model simulations and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8677–8701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8677-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-8677-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation> Spivakovsky, C. M., Logan, J. A., Montzka, S. A., Balkanski, Y., Foreman-Fowler, M. S., Jones, D. B., Horowitz, L. W., Fusco, A. C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A., Prather, M. J., Wofsy, S. C., and McElroy, M. B.: Three-dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 8931–8980, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Stevenson, D. S., Zhao, A., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Tilmes, S., Zeng, G., Murray, L. T., Collins, W. J., Griffiths, P. T., Shim, S., Horowitz, L. W., Sentman, L. T., and Emmons, L.: Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12905–12920, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Stewart, D. J., Griffiths, P. T., and Cox, R. A.: Reactive uptake coefficients for heterogeneous reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with submicron aerosols of NaCl and natural sea salt, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1381–1388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-1381-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-1381-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Strode, S. A., Liu, J., Lait, L., Commane, R., Daube, B., Wofsy, S., Conaty, A., Newman, P., and Prather, M.: Forecasting carbon monoxide on a global scale for the ATom-1 aircraft mission: insights from airborne and satellite observations and modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10955–10971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10955-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10955-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Tabazadeh, A., Yokelson, R. J., Singh, H. B., Hobbs, P. V., Crawford, J. H., and Iraci, L. T.: Heterogeneous chemistry involving methanol in tropospheric clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018775</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Talukdar, R. K., Longfellow, C. A., Gilles, M. K., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Quantum yields of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the photolysis of ozone between 289 and 329 nm as a function of temperature, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 143–146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL03354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97GL03354</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Tan, D., Faloona, I., Simpas, J. B., Brune, W., Olson, J., Crawford, J., Avery, M., Sachse, G., Vay, S., Sandholm, S., Guan, H.-W., Vaughn, T., Mastromarino, J., Heikes, B., Snow, J., Podolske, J., and Singh, H.: OH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropical Pacific: Results from PEM-Tropics B, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 32667–32681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD900002</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Theil, H.: A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis, P. K. Ned. Akad. Wetensc., 53, 386–392,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_20" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_20</ext-link>, 1950.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, C. R., Wofsy, S. C., Prather, M. J., Newman, P. A., Hanisco, T. F., Ryerson, T. B., Fahey, D. W., Apel, E. C., Brock, C. A., Brune, W. H., Froyd, K., Katich, J. M., Nicely, J. M., Peischl, J., Ray, E., Veres, P. R., Wang, S., Allen, H. M., Asher, E., Bian, H., Blake, D., Bourgeois, I., Budney, J., Bui, T. P., Butler, A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Chang, C., Chin, M., Commane, R., Correa, G., Crounse, J. D., Daube, B., Dibb, J. E., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G. S., Döllner, M., Elkins, J. W., Fiore, A. M., Flynn, C. M., Guo, H., Hall, S. R., Hannun, R. A., Hills, A., Hintsa, E. J., Hodzic, A., Hornbrook, R. S., Huey, L. G., Jiménez-Palacios, J. L., Keeling, R. F., Kim, M. J., Kupc, A., Lacey, F., Lait, L. R., Lamarque, J.-F., Liu, J., McKain, K., Meinardi, S., Miller, D. O., Montzka, S. A., Moore, F. L., Morgan, E. J., Murphy, D. M., Murray, L. T., Nault, B. A., Neuman, J. A., Nguyen, L., Gonzalez, Y., Rollins, A., Rosenlof, K., Sargent, M., Schill, G., Schwarz, J. P., St. Clair, J. M., Steenrod, S. D., Stephens, B. B., Strahan, S. E., Strode, S. A., Sweeney, C., Thames, A. B., Ullmann, K., Wagner, N., Weber, R., Weinzierl, B., Wennberg, P. O., Williamson, C. J., Wolfe, G. M., and Zeng, L.: The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E761–E790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0315.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0315.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, R. L., Montzka, S. A., Vollmer, M. K., Arduini, J., Crotwell, M., Krummel, P. B., Lunder, C., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Reimann, S., Vimont, I., Wang, H., Weiss, R. F., and Young, D.: Estimation of the atmospheric hydroxyl radical oxidative capacity using multiple hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1415–1427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1415-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-1415-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Thornton, J. A., Braban, C. F., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis on sub-micron organic aerosols: The effect of relative humidity, particle phase, and particle size, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 4593–4603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B307498F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B307498F</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Tie, X., Emmons, L., Horowitz, L., Brasseur, G., Ridley, B., Atlas, E., Hess, P., Klonecki, A., Madronich, S., Talbot, R., Dibb, J., Marbouty, D., and Hennessy, J.: Effect of sulfate aerosol on tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ozone budgets model simulations and TOPSE evidence, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001508</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Travis, K. R., Heald, C. L., Allen, H. M., Apel, E. C., Arnold, S. R., Blake, D. R., Brune, W. H., Chen, X., Commane, R., Crounse, J. D., Daube, B. C., Diskin, G. S., Elkins, J. W., Evans, M. J., Hall, S. R., Hintsa, E. J., Hornbrook, R. S., Kasibhatla, P. S., Kim, M. J., Luo, G., McKain, K., Millet, D. B., Moore, F. L., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Sherwen, T., Thames, A. B., Ullmann, K., Wang, X., Wennberg, P. O., Wolfe, G. M., and Yu, F.: Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7753–7781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O., and Jacob, D. J.: Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 5367–5372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616020114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616020114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., and Kort, E. A.: Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 2805–2813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1814297116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Voulgarakis, A., Naik, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Shindell, D. T., Young, P. J., Prather, M. J., Wild, O., Field, R. D., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R. M., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G. A., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Analysis of present day and future OH and methane lifetime in the ACCMIP simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2563–2587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2563-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2563-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Lu, X., Jacob, D. J., Cooper, O. R., Chang, K.-L., Li, K., Gao, M., Liu, Y., Sheng, B., Wu, K., Wu, T., Zhang, J., Sauvage, B., Nédélec, P., Blot, R., and Fan, S.: Global tropospheric ozone trends, attributions, and radiative impacts in 1995–2017: an integrated analysis using aircraft (IAGOS) observations, ozonesonde, and multi-decadal chemical model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13753–13782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A., Emmons, L. K., Tilmes, S., Lamarque, J.-F., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Kim, M., Allen, H., Ryerson, T. B., Thompson, C. R., Peischl, J., Moore, F., Nance, D., Hall, B., Elkins, J., Tanner, D., Huey, L. G., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G. S., Flocke, F. M., Ray, E., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., St. Clair, J., Commane, R., Daube, B., Barletta, B., Blake, D. R., Weinzierl, B., Dollner, M., Conley, A., Vitt, F., Wofsy, S. C., Riemer, D. D., and Apel, E. C.: Atmospheric acetaldehyde: Importance of air-sea exchange and a missing source in the remote troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5601–5613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL082034</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Wild, O.: Modelling the global tropospheric ozone budget: exploring the variability in current models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2643–2660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2643-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-2643-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation> Wild, O. and Prather, M. J.: Excitation of the primary tropospheric chemical mode in a global 3-D model, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24647–24660, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Wild, O., Voulgarakis, A., O'Connor, F., Lamarque, J.-F., Ryan, E. M., and Lee, L.: Global sensitivity analysis of chemistry–climate model budgets of tropospheric ozone and OH: exploring model diversity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4047–4058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4047-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4047-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Wofsy, S., Afshar, S., Allen, H., Apel, E., Asher, E., Barletta, B., Bent, J., Bian, H., Biggs, B., Blake, D., Blake, N., Bourgeois, I., Brock, C., Brune, W., Budney, J., Bui, T., Butler, A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Chang, C., Chin, M., Commane, R., Correa, G., Crounse, J., Cullis, P., Daube, B., Day, D., Dean-Day, J., Dibb, J., DiGangi, J., Diskin, G., Dollner, M., Elkins, J., Erdesz, F., Fiore, A., Flynn, C., Froyd, K., Gesler, D., Hall, S., Hanisco, T., Hannun, R., Hills, A., Hintsa, E., Hoffman, A., Hornbrook, R., Huey, L., Hughes, S., Jimenez, J., Johnson, B., Katich, J., Keeling, R., Kim, M., Kupc, A., Lait, L., McKain, K., Mclaughlin, R., Meinardi, S., Miller, D., Montzka, S., Moore, F., Morgan, E., Murphy, D., Murray, L., Nault, B., Neuman, J., Newman, P., Nicely, J., Pan, X., Paplawsky, W., Peischl, J., Prather, M., Price, D., Ray, E., Reeves, J., Richardson, M., Rollins, A., Rosenlof, K., Ryerson, T., Scheuer, E., Schill, G., Schroder, J., Schwarz, J., St.Clair, J., Steenrod, S., Stephens, B., Strode, S., Sweeney, C., Tanner, D., Teng, A., Thames, A., Thompson, C., Ullmann, K., Veres, P., Wagner, N., Watt, A., Weber, R., Weinzierl, B., Wennberg, P., Williamson, C., Wilson, J., Wolfe, G., Woods, C., Zeng, L., and Vieznor, N.: ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols, Version 2 (Version 2.0), ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1925" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1925</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Beale, R., Liss, P., Johnson, M., Blomquist, B., and Nightingale, P.: Air–sea fluxes of oxygenated volatile organic compounds across the Atlantic Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7499–7517, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7499-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7499-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Yin, Y., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Broquet, G., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Pison, I., and Saunois, M.: Decadal trends in global CO emissions as seen by MOPITT, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13433–13451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13433-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13433-2015</ext-link>, 2015. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., Tilmes, S., Wild, O., Zhang, L., Ziemke, J., Brandt, J., Delcloo, A., Doherty, R. M., Geels, C., Hegglin, M. I., Hu, L., Im, U., Kumar, R., Luhar, A., Murray, L., Plummer, D., Rodriguez, J., Saiz-Lopez, A., Schultz, M. G., Woodhouse, M. T., and Zeng, G.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 6, 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.265</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Zara, M., Boersma, K. F., De Smedt, I., Richter, A., Peters, E., van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Beirle, S., Wagner, T., Van Roozendael, M., Marchenko, S., Lamsal, L. N., and Eskes, H. J.: Improved slant column density retrieval of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde for OMI and GOME-2A from QA4ECV: intercomparison, uncertainty characterisation, and trends, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4033–4058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4033-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-4033-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Hauglustaine, D. A., Szopa, S., Stavert, A. R., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Bekki, S., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Marécal, V., O'Connor, F. M., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Zheng, B.: Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13701–13723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Zheng, B.: On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13011–13022, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y. H., Zheng, B., Saunois, M., Ciais, P., Michaela I. Hegglin, M. I., Lu, S. M., Li, Y. F., and Bousquet, P.: Air pollution modulates trends and variability of the global methane budget, Nature, 642, 369–375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09004-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-025-09004-z</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Yin, Y., Deeter, M. N., Worden, H. M., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Rapid decline in carbon monoxide emissions and export from East Asia between years 2005 and 2016, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 044007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2b3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aab2b3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., Duncan, B. N., Froidevaux, L., Bhartia, P. K., Levelt, P. F., and Waters, J. W.: Tropospheric ozone determined from Aura OMI and MLS: Evaluation of measurements and comparison with the Global Modeling Initiative's Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D19303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007089</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Strode, S. A., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., McPeters, R. D., Bhartia, P. K., Froidevaux, L., Labow, G. J., Witte, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Haffner, D. P., Kramarova, N. A., Frith, S. M., Huang, L.-K., Jaross, G. R., Seftor, C. J., Deland, M. T., and Taylor, S. L.: Trends in global tropospheric ozone inferred from a composite record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS satellite measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3257–3269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Tropospheric OH and its trends: new insight into atmospheric processes and implications for methane lifetime</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Allen, D. J. and Pickering, K. E.:
Evaluation of lightning flash rate parameterizations for use in a global chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4711, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002066</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Amedro, D., Bunkan, A. J. C., Berasategui, M., and Crowley, J. N.:
Kinetics of the OH + NO<sub>2</sub> reaction: rate coefficients (217–333&thinsp;K, 16–1200&thinsp;mbar) and fall-off parameters for N<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> bath gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10643–10657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10643-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10643-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Amedro, D., Berasategui, M., Bunkan, A. J. C., Pozzer, A., Lelieveld, J., and Crowley, J. N.:
Kinetics of the OH + NO<sub>2</sub> reaction: effect of water vapour and new parameterization for global modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3091–3105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3091-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3091-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Anderson, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Fiore, A. M., Baublitz, C. B., Follette-Cook, M. B., Nicely, J. M., and Wolfe, G. M.:
Spatial and temporal variability in the hydroxyl (OH) radical: understanding the role of large-scale climate features and their influence on OH through its dynamical and photochemical drivers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6481–6508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6481-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6481-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Anderson, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Liu, J., Nicely, J. M., Strode, S. A., Follette-Cook, M. B., Souri, A. H., Ziemke, J. R., González-Abad, G., and Ayazpour, Z.:
Trends and interannual variability of the hydroxyl radical in the remote tropics during boreal autumn inferred from satellite proxy data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2024GL108531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108531</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Archibald, A. T., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Archer-Nicholls, S., Chipperfield, M. P., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Dennison, F., Dhomse, S. S., Griffiths, P. T., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Hill, R. S., Johnson, C. E., Keeble, J., Köhler, M. O., Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J. P., Ordóñez, C., Pope, R. J., Rumbold, S. T., Russo, M. R., Savage, N. H., Sellar, A., Stringer, M., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., and Zeng, G.:
Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1223–1266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Zara, M., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., Maasakkers, J. D., van der A, R. J., Nightingale, J., De Rudder, A., Irie, H., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., and Compernolle, S. C.:
Improving algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite NO<sub>2</sub> retrievals: results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables (QA4ECV) project, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6651–6678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Bossolasco, A., Fernandez, R. P., Li, Q., Mahajan, A. S., Villamayor, J., Barrera, J. A., Heard, D. E., Cuevas, C. A., Caram, C., Szopaj, S., and Saiz-Lopez, A.:
Key role of short-lived halogens on global atmospheric oxidation during historical periods, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 5, 547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ea00141a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ea00141a</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Bozzo, A., Benedetti, A., Flemming, J., Kipling, Z., and Rémy, S.:
An aerosol climatology for global models based on the tropospheric aerosol scheme in the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1007–1034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1007-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1007-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Brasseur, G. P. and Solomon, S.:
Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere, Springer Netherlands, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3824-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3824-0</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Brune, W. H., Miller, D. O., Thames, A. B., Allen, H. M., Apel, E. C., Blake, D. R., Bui, T. P., Commane, R., Crounse, J. D., Daube, B. C., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Elkins, J. W., Hall, S. R., Hanisco, T. F., Hannun, R. A., Hintsa, E. J., Hornbrook, R. S., Kim, M. J., McKain, K., Moore, F. L., Neuman, J. A., Nicely, J. M., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., St. Clair, J. M., Sweeney, C., Teng, A. P., Thompson, C., Ullmann, K., Veres, P. R., Wennberg, P. O., and Wolfe, G. M.:
Exploring Oxidation in the Remote Free Troposphere: Insights From Atmospheric Tomography (ATom), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031685, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031685" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031685</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Cappa, C., Crounse, J. D., Dibble, T. S., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Percival, C. J., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P. H.:
Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 19, JPL Publication 19-5, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, <a href="https://dataverse.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:2014/49199&amp;version=2.1" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 September 2026), 1 May 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Cantrell, C. A., Shetter, R. E., Gilpin, T. M., Calvert, J. G., Eisele, F. L., and Tanner, D. J.:
Peroxy radical concentrations measured and calculated from trace gas measurements in the Mauna Loa observatory photochemistry experiment 2, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 14653–14664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03613" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03613</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Christian, K. E., Brune, W. H., Mao, J., and Ren, X.:
Global sensitivity analysis of GEOS-Chem modeled ozone and hydrogen oxides during the INTEX campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2443–2460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2443-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2443-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       Chua, G., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.:
Exploring the drivers of tropospheric hydroxyl radical trends in the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory AM4.1 atmospheric chemistry–climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4955–4975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4955-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4955-2023</a>, 2023. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       Chua, G., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.:
Role of future climate change, air pollution control and methane mitigation in driving hydroxyl radical (OH) and methane lifetime, Geophys. Res. Lett., 53, e2025GL120136, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Compernolle, S., Verhoelst, T., Pinardi, G., Granville, J., Hubert, D., Keppens, A., Niemeijer, S., Rino, B., Bais, A., Beirle, S., Boersma, F., Burrows, J. P., De Smedt, I., Eskes, H., Goutail, F., Hendrick, F., Lorente, A., Pazmino, A., Piters, A., Peters, E., Pommereau, J.-P., Remmers, J., Richter, A., van Geffen, J., Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., and Lambert, J.-C.:
Validation of Aura-OMI QA4ECV NO<sub>2</sub> climate data records with ground-based DOAS networks: the role of measurement and comparison uncertainties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8017–8045, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8017-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8017-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Crutzen, P. J.:
The Role of NO and NO<sub>2</sub> in the Chemistry of the Troposphere and Stratosphere, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 7, 443–472, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Deeter, M., Francis, G., Gille, J., Mao, D., Martínez-Alonso, S., Worden, H., Ziskin, D., Drummond, J., Commane, R., Diskin, G., and McKain, K.:
The MOPITT Version 9 CO product: sampling enhancements and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2325–2344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2325-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2325-2022</a>, 2022. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       Duncan, B. N., Lamsal, L. N., Thompson, A. M., Yoshida, Y., Lu, Z. F., Streets, D. G., Hurwitz, M. M., and Pickering, K. E.:
A space-based, high-resolution view of notable changes in urban NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> pollution around the world (2005–2014), J. Geophys. Res., 121, 976–996, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024121</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Elshorbany, Y., Ziemke, J. R., Strode, S., Petetin, H., Miyazaki, K., De Smedt, I., Pickering, K., Seguel, R. J., Worden, H., Emmerichs, T., Taraborrelli, D., Cazorla, M., Fadnavis, S., Buchholz, R. R., Gaubert, B., Rojas, N. Y., Nogueira, T., Salameh, T., and Huang, M.:
Tropospheric ozone precursors: global and regional distributions, trends, and variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12225–12257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12225-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12225-2024</a>, 2024. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Emmons, L. K., Schwantes, R. H., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G., Kinnison, D., Lamarque, J., Marsh, D., Mills, M. J., Tilmes, S., Bardeen, C., Buchholz, R. R., Conley, A., Gettelman, A., Garcia, R., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., and Pétron, G.:
The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001882, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001882" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001882</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fei, D. D., Hou, X. W., and Wei, L.: Quantitative sources of global surface ozone and spatial and temporal distribution characteristics, China Environmental Science, 41, 3004–3016, <a href="https://link.oversea.cnki.net/doi/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2021.0302" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 September 2026), 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Fiore, A. M., Dentener, F. J., Wild, O., Cuvelier, C., Schultz, M. G., Hess, P., Textor, C., Schulz, M., Doherty, R. M., Horowitz, L. W., MacKenzie, A., Sanderson, M. G., Shindell, D. T., Stevenson, D. S., Szopa, S., Van Dingenen, R., Zeng, G., Atherton, C., Bergmann, D., Bey, I., Carmichael, G., Collins, W. J., Duncan, B. N., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G., Gauss, M., Gong, S., Hauglustaine, D., Holloway, T., Isaksen, I. S. A., Jacob, D. J., Jonson, J. E., Kaminski, J. W., Keating, T. J., Lupu, A., Marmer, E., Montanaro, V., Park, R. J., Pitari, G., Pringle, K. J., Pyle, J. A., Schroeder, S., Vivanco, M. G., Wind, P., Wojcik, G., Wu, S., and Zuber, A.:
Multimodel estimates of intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D04301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010816</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Fiore, A. M., Mickley, L. J., Zhu, Q., and Baublitz, C. B.:
Climate and Tropospheric Oxidizing Capacity, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 52, 11.1–11.29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-090307" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-090307</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Gaubert, B., Emmons, L. K., Raeder, K., Tilmes, S., Miyazaki, K., Arellano Jr., A. F., Elguindi, N., Granier, C., Tang, W., Barré, J., Worden, H. M., Buchholz, R. R., Edwards, D. P., Franke, P., Anderson, J. L., Saunois, M., Schroeder, J., Woo, J.-H., Simpson, I. J., Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J., Teng, A., Kim, M., Dickerson, R. R., He, H., Ren, X., Pusede, S. E., and Diskin, G. S.:
Correcting model biases of CO in East Asia: impact on oxidant distributions during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14617–14647, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14617-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14617-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Granier, C., Guether, A., Lamarque, J. F., Mieville, A., Muller, J. F., Olivier, J., Orlando, J., Peters, J., Petron, G., Tyndall, G., and Wallens, S.:
POET, a database of surface emissions of ozone precursors, <a href="https://eccad.aeris-data.fr" target="_blank"/> (last access: 19 September 2026), 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Granier, C., Darras, S., Denier van der Gon, H., Doubalova, J., Elguindi, N., Galle, B., Gauss, M., Guevara, M., Jalkanen, J.-P., Kuenen, J., Liousse, C., Quack, B., Simpson, D., and Sindelarova, K.:
The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service global and regional emissions (April 2019 version), Report April 2019 version, <a href="https://doi.org/10.24380/d0bn-kx16" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24380/d0bn-kx16</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Griffiths, P. T., Murray, L. T., Zeng, G., Shin, Y. M., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Deushi, M., Emmons, L. K., Galbally, I. E., Hassler, B., Horowitz, L. W., Keeble, J., Liu, J., Moeini, O., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Oshima, N., Tarasick, D., Tilmes, S., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., Young, P. J., and Zanis, P.:
Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4187–4218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Ha, P. T. M., Matsuda, R., Kanaya, Y., Taketani, F., and Sudo, K.:
Effects of heterogeneous reactions on tropospheric chemistry: a global simulation with the chemistry–climate model CHASER V4.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3813–3841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3813-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3813-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Heymsfield, A., Winker D., Avery, M., Vaughan, M., Diskin, G., Deng, M., Mitev, V., and Matthey R.:
Relationships between Ice Water Content and Volume Extinction Coefficient from In Situ Observations for Temperatures from 0° to −86&thinsp;°C: Implications for Spaceborne Lidar Retrievals, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 479–505, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-087.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-087.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Holmes, C. D., Prather, M. J., Søvde, O. A., and Myhre, G.:
Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 285–302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-285-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-285-2013</a>, 2013. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Holmes, C. D., Bertram, T. H., Confer, K. L., Graham, K. A., Ronan, A. C., Wirks, C. K., and Shah, V.:
The role of clouds in the tropospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> cycle: A new modelling approach for cloud chemistry and its global implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4980–4990, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL081990" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL081990</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Hou, X., Wild, O., Zhu, B., and Lee, J.:
Future tropospheric ozone budget and distribution over east Asia under a net-zero scenario, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15395–15411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15395-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15395-2023</a>, 2023a. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Hou, X., Zhang, Y., Lv, X., and Lee, J.:
The Impact of Meteorological Conditions and Emissions on Tropospheric Column Ozone Trends in Recent Years, Remote Sens.-Basel, 15, 5293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225293</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hou, X.: Model outputs for “Tropospheric OH and Its Trends: New Insight into Atmospheric Processes and Implications for Methane Lifetime”, Version v1, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19112214" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19112214</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Jacob, D. J.:
Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2131–2159, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Jiang, Z., Zhu, R., Miyazaki, K., McDonald, B. C., Klimont, Z., Zheng, B., Boersma, K. F., Zhang, Q., Worden, H., Worden, J. R., Henze, D. K., Jones, D. B. A., van der Gon, H. A. C. D., and Eskes, H.:
Decadal variabilities in tropospheric nitrogen oxides over United States, Europe, and China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035872" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035872</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Kendall, M. G.:
Rank Correlation Methods, 4th edn., Charles Griffin, London, ISBN 9780852641996, 1975.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       Lawrence, M. G., Jöckel, P., and von Kuhlmann, R.:
What does the global mean OH concentration tell us?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 1, 37–49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-1-37-2001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-1-37-2001</a>, 2001. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.:
Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, J., Strode, S. A., Liang, Q., Oman, L. D., Colarco, P. R., Fleming, E. L., Manyin, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Ziemke, J. R., Lamsal, L. N., and Li, C.:
Change in tropospheric ozone in the recent decades and its contribution to global total ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JD037170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037170</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, M., Song, Y., Matsui, H., Shang, F., Kang, L., Cai, X., Zhang, H., and Zhu, T.:
Enhanced atmospheric oxidation toward carbon neutrality reduces methane's climate forcing, Nat. Commun., 15, 3148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47436-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47436-9</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Logan, J. A., Prather, M. J., Wofsy, S. C., and McElroy, M. B.:
Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 7210–7254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC08p07210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC08p07210</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Macintyre, H. L. and Evans, M. J.:
Sensitivity of a global model to the uptake of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> by tropospheric aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7409–7414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7409-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7409-2010</a>, 2010. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
McNorton, J., Chipperfield, M. P., Gloor, M., Wilson, C., Feng, W., Hayman, G. D., Rigby, M., Krummel, P. B., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., Young, D., Dlugokencky, E., and Montzka, S. A.: Role of OH variability in the stalling of the global atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> growth rate from 1999 to 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7943–7956, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7943-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7943-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Mann, H. B.:
Nonparametric tests against trend, Econometrica, 13, 245–259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187</a>, 1945.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Meinshausen, M., Vogel, E., Nauels, A., Lorbacher, K., Meinshausen, N., Etheridge, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Montzka, S. A., Rayner, P. J., Trudinger, C. M., Krummel, P. B., Beyerle, U., Canadell, J. G., Daniel, J. S., Enting, I. G., Law, R. M., Lunder, C. R., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Reimann, S., Rubino, M., Velders, G. J. M., Vollmer, M. K., Wang, R. H. J., and Weiss, R.:
Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2057–2116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2057-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2057-2017</a>, 2017. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Millet, D. B., Guenther, A., Siegel, D. A., Nelson, N. B., Singh, H. B., de Gouw, J. A., Warneke, C., Williams, J., Eerdekens, G., Sinha, V., Karl, T., Flocke, F., Apel, E., Riemer, D. D., Palmer, P. I., and Barkley, M.:
Global atmospheric budget of acetaldehyde: 3-D model analysis and constraints from in-situ and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3405–3425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3405-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3405-2010</a>, 2010. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
       Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H., Sudo, K., Boersma, K. F., Bowman, K., and Kanaya, Y.:
Decadal changes in global surface NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions from multi-constituent satellite data assimilation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 807–837, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017</a>, 2017. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Monks, S. A., Arnold, S. R., Hollaway, M. J., Pope, R. J., Wilson, C., Feng, W., Emmerson, K. M., Kerridge, B. J., Latter, B. L., Miles, G. M., Siddans, R., and Chipperfield, M. P.:
The TOMCAT global chemical transport model v1.6: description of chemical mechanism and model evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3025–3057, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3025-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3025-2017</a>, 2017. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Montzka, S. A., Krol, M., Dlugokencky, E., Hall, B., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.:
Small interannual variability of global atmospheric hydroxyl, Science, 331, 67–69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197640" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197640</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
       Naik, V., Voulgarakis, A., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, M., Prather, M. J., Young, P. J., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P. J., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G. A., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., van Noije, T. P. C., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R., Shindell, D. T., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.:
Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5277–5298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5277-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5277-2013</a>, 2013. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       Naus, S., Montzka, S. A., Pandey, S., Basu, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Krol, M.:
Constraints and biases in a tropospheric two-box model of OH, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 407–424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-407-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-407-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       Newsome, B. and Evans, M.:
Impact of uncertainties in inorganic chemical rate constants on tropospheric composition and ozone radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14333–14352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14333-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14333-2017</a>, 2017. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Nicely, J. M., Salawitch, R. J., Canty, T., Anderson, D. C., Arnold, S. R., Chipperfield, M. P., Emmons, L. K., Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Kinnison, D. E., Lamarque, J.-F., Mao, J., Monks, S. A., Steenrod, S. D., Tilmes, S., and Turquety, S.:
Quantifying the causes of differences in tropospheric OH within global models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 1983–2007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026239" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026239</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Nicely, J. M., Duncan, B. N., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Salawitch, R. J., Deushi, M., Haslerud, A. S., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D. E., Klekociuk, A., Manyin, M. E., Marécal, V., Morgenstern, O., Murray, L. T., Myhre, G., Oman, L. D., Pitari, G., Pozzer, A., Quaglia, I., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Stone, K., Strahan, S., Tilmes, S., Tost, H., Westervelt, D. M., and Zeng, G.:
A machine learning examination of hydroxyl radical differences among model simulations for CCMI-1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1341–1361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Patra, P. K., Krol, M. C., Montzka, S. A., Arnold, T., Atlas, E. L., Lintner, B. R., Stephens, B. B., Xiang, B., Elkins, J. W., Fraser, P. J., Ghosh, A., Hintsa, E. J., Hurst, D. F., Ishijima, K., Krummel, P. B., Miller, B. R., Miyazaki, K., Moore, F. L., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Steele, L. P., Takigawa, M., Wang, H. J., Weiss, R. F., Wofsy, S. C., and Young, D.:
Observational evidence for interhemispheric hydroxyl-radical parity, Nature, 513, 219–223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13721</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Patra, P. K., Krol, M. C., Prinn, R. G., Takigawa, M., Mühle, J., Montzka, S. A., Lal, S., Yamashita, Y., Naus, S., Chandra, N., Weiss, R. F., Krummel, P. B., Fraser, P. J., O'Doherty, S., and Elkins, J. W.:
Methyl Chloroform Continues to Constrain the Hydroxyl (OH) Variability in the Troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033862, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033862" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033862</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Phillips, D. P., Hopkins, F. E., Bell, T. G., Liss, P. S., Nightingale, P. D., Reeves, C. E., Wohl, C., and Yang, M.:
Air–sea exchange of acetone, acetaldehyde, DMS and isoprene at a UK coastal site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10111–10132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10111-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10111-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Pickering, K. E., Wang, Y., Tao, W.-K., Price, C., and Müller, J.-F.:
Vertical distributions of lightning NOx for use in regional and global chemical transport models, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31203–31216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02651" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02651</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Pimlott, M. A., Pope, R. J., Kerridge, B. J., Latter, B. G., Knappett, D. S., Heard, D. E., Ventress, L. J., Siddans, R., Feng, W., and Chipperfield, M. P.:
Investigating the global OH radical distribution using steady-state approximations and satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10467–10488, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10467-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10467-2022</a>, 2022. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
       Prather, M. J. and Zhu, L.:
Resetting tropospheric OH and CH<sub>4</sub> lifetime with ultraviolet H<sub>2</sub>O absorption, Science, 385, 201–204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn0415" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn0415</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Prather, M. J., Holmes, C. D., and Hsu, J.:
Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: Systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051440" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051440</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
       Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., Cunnold, D. M., Alyea, F. N., O'Doherty, S., Salameh, P., Miller, B. R., Huang, J., Wang, R. H. J., Hartley, D. E., Harth, C., Steele, L. P., Sturrock, G., Midgley, P. M., and McCulloch, A.:
A history of chemically and radiatively important gases in air deduced from ALE/GAGE/AGAGE, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 17751–17792, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900141" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900141</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
       Prinn, R. G., Huang, J., Weiss, R. F., Cunnold, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., McCulloch, A., Harth, C., Reimann, S., Salameh, P., O'Doherty, S., Wang, R. H. J., Porter, L. W., Miller, B. R., and Krummel, P. B.:
Evidence for variability of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals over the past quarter century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 07809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022228" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022228</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Read, K. A., Carpenter, L. J., Arnold, S. R., Beale, R., Nightingale, P. D., Hopkins, J. R., Lewis, A. C., Lee, J. D., Mendes, L., and Pickering, S. J.:
Multiannual observations of acetone, methanol, and acetaldehyde in remote Tropical Atlantic air: Implications for atmospheric OVOC budgets and oxidative capacity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 11028–11039, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302082p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es302082p</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
       Richter, A., Eyring, V., Burrows, J. P., Bovensmann, H., Lauer, A., Sierk, B., and Crutzen, P. J.:
Satellite measurements of NO<sub>2</sub> from international shipping emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L23110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020822" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020822</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rigby, M., Montzka, S. A., Prinn, R. G., White, J. W. C., Young, D., O'Doherty, S., Lunt, M. F., Ganesan, A. L., Manning, A. J., Simmonds, P. G., Salameh, P. K., Harth, C. M., Mühle, J., Weiss, R. F., Fraser, P. J., Steele, L. P., Krummel, P. B., McCulloch, A., and Park, S.: Role of atmospheric oxidation in recent methane growth, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 5373–5377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616426114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616426114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
       Rolletter, M., Hofzumahaus, A., Novelli, A., Wahner, A., and Fuchs, H.:
Kinetics of the reactions of OH with CO, NO, and NO<sub>2</sub> and of HO<sub>2</sub> with NO<sub>2</sub> in air at 1&thinsp;atm pressure, room temperature, and tropospheric water vapour concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3481–3502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3481-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3481-2025</a>, 2025. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schultz, M. G., Schröder, S., Lyapina, O., and Cooper, O. R.: Pre-compiled metrics data sets, links to gridded files in NetCDF format, PANGAEA [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.880506" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.880506</a>, 2017a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schultz, M. G., Schröder, S., Lyapina, O., Cooper, O. R., Galbally, I., Petropavlovskikh, I., von Schneidemesser, E., Tanimoto, H., Elshorbany, Y., Naja, M., Seguel, R. J., Dauert, U., Eckhardt, P., Feigenspahn, S., Fiebig, M., Hjellbrekke, A.-G., Hong, Y.-D., Kjeld, P. C., Koide, H., Lear, G., Tarasick, D., Ueno, M., Wallasch, M., Baumgardner, D., Chuang, M.-T., Gillett, R., Lee, M., Molloy, S., Moolla, R., Wang, T., Sharps, K., Adame, J. A., Ancellet, G., Apadula, F., Artaxo, P., Barlasina, M. E., Bogucka, M., Bonasoni, P., Chang, L., Colomb, A., Cuevas-Agulló, E., Cupeiro, M., Degórska, A., Ding, A., Fröhlich, M., Frolova, M., Gadhavi, H., Gheusi, F., Gilge, S., Gonzalez, M. Y., Gros, V., Hamad, S. H., Helmig, D., Henriques, D., Hermansen, O., Holla, R., Huber, J., Im, U., Jaffe, D. A., Komala, N., Kubistin, D., Lam, K.-S., Laurila, T., Lee, H., Levy, I., Mazzoleni, C., Mazzoleni, L. R., McClure-Begley, A., Mohamad, M., Murovec, M., Navarro-Comas, M., Nicodim, F., Parrish, D., Read, K. A., Reid, N., Ries, L., Saxena, P., Schwab, J. J., Scorgie, Y., Senik, I., Simmonds, P., Sinha, V., Skorokhod, A. I., Spain, G., Spangl, W., Spoor, R., Springston, S. R., Steer, K., Steinbacher, M., Suharguniyawan, E., Torre, P., Trickl, T., Weili, L., Weller, R., Xu, X., Xue, L., and Ma, Z.:
The Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: database and metrics data of global surface ozone observations, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 5, 58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.244" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.244</a>, 2017b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
       Sen, P. K.:
Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934</a>, 1968.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
       Shindell, D. T., Faluvegi, G., Stevenson, D. S., Krol, M. C., Emmons, L. K., Lamarque, J.-F., Pétron, G., Dentener, F. J., Ellingsen, K., Schultz, M. G., Wild, O., Amann, M., Atherton, C. S., Bergmann, D. J., Bey, I., Butler, T., Cofala, J., Collins, W. J., Derwent, R. G., Doherty, R. M., Drevet, J., Eskes, H. J., Fiore, A. M., Gauss, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., Horowitz, L. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Lawrence, M. G., Montanaro, V., Müller, J.-F., Pitari, G., Prather, M. J., Pyle, J. A., Rast, S., Rodriguez, J. M., Sanderson, M. G., Savage, N. H., Strahan, S. E., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Unger, N., van Noije, T. P. C., and Zeng, G.:
Multimodel simulations of carbon monoxide: Comparison with observations and projected near-future changes, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D19306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007100</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
       Simpson, D. and Darras, S.:
Global soil NO emissions for Atmospheric Chemical Transport Modelling: CAMS-GLOB-SOIL v2.2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-221" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-221</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
       Sindelarova, K., Markova, J., Simpson, D., Huszar, P., Karlicky, J., Darras, S., and Granier, C.:
High-resolution biogenic global emission inventory for the time period 2000–2019 for air quality modelling, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 251–270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-251-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-251-2022</a>, 2022. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
       Soulie, A., Granier, C., Darras, S., Zilbermann, N., Doumbia, T., Guevara, M., Jalkanen, J.-P., Keita, S., Liousse, C., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Hoesly, R., and Smith, S. J.:
Global anthropogenic emissions (CAMS-GLOB-ANT) for the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service simulations of air quality forecasts and reanalyses, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2261–2279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2261-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2261-2024</a>, 2024. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
       Souri, A. H., Duncan, B. N., Strode, S. A., Anderson, D. C., Manyin, M. E., Liu, J., Oman, L. D., Zhang, Z., and Weir, B.:
Enhancing long-term trend simulation of the global tropospheric hydroxyl (TOH) and its drivers from 2005 to 2019: a synergistic integration of model simulations and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8677–8701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8677-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8677-2024</a>, 2024. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
       Spivakovsky, C. M., Logan, J. A., Montzka, S. A., Balkanski, Y., Foreman-Fowler, M. S., Jones, D. B., Horowitz, L. W., Fusco, A. C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A., Prather, M. J., Wofsy, S. C., and McElroy, M. B.:
Three-dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 8931–8980, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
       Stevenson, D. S., Zhao, A., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Tilmes, S., Zeng, G., Murray, L. T., Collins, W. J., Griffiths, P. T., Shim, S., Horowitz, L. W., Sentman, L. T., and Emmons, L.:
Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12905–12920, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
       Stewart, D. J., Griffiths, P. T., and Cox, R. A.:
Reactive uptake coefficients for heterogeneous reaction of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> with submicron aerosols of NaCl and natural sea salt, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1381–1388, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-1381-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-1381-2004</a>, 2004. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
       Strode, S. A., Liu, J., Lait, L., Commane, R., Daube, B., Wofsy, S., Conaty, A., Newman, P., and Prather, M.:
Forecasting carbon monoxide on a global scale for the ATom-1 aircraft mission: insights from airborne and satellite observations and modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10955–10971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10955-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10955-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
       Tabazadeh, A., Yokelson, R. J., Singh, H. B., Hobbs, P. V., Crawford, J. H., and Iraci, L. T.:
Heterogeneous chemistry involving methanol in tropospheric clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018775" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018775</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
       Talukdar, R. K., Longfellow, C. A., Gilles, M. K., and Ravishankara, A. R.:
Quantum yields of O(<sup>1</sup>D) in the photolysis of ozone between 289 and 329&thinsp;nm as a function of temperature, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 143–146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL03354" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL03354</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
       Tan, D., Faloona, I., Simpas, J. B., Brune, W., Olson, J., Crawford, J., Avery, M., Sachse, G., Vay, S., Sandholm, S., Guan, H.-W., Vaughn, T., Mastromarino, J., Heikes, B., Snow, J., Podolske, J., and Singh, H.:
OH and HO<sub>2</sub> in the tropical Pacific: Results from PEM-Tropics B, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 32667–32681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900002</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
       Theil, H.:
A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis, P. K. Ned. Akad. Wetensc., 53, 386–392,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_20" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_20</a>, 1950.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
       Thompson, C. R., Wofsy, S. C., Prather, M. J., Newman, P. A., Hanisco, T. F., Ryerson, T. B., Fahey, D. W., Apel, E. C., Brock, C. A., Brune, W. H., Froyd, K., Katich, J. M., Nicely, J. M., Peischl, J., Ray, E., Veres, P. R., Wang, S., Allen, H. M., Asher, E., Bian, H., Blake, D., Bourgeois, I., Budney, J., Bui, T. P., Butler, A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Chang, C., Chin, M., Commane, R., Correa, G., Crounse, J. D., Daube, B., Dibb, J. E., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G. S., Döllner, M., Elkins, J. W., Fiore, A. M., Flynn, C. M., Guo, H., Hall, S. R., Hannun, R. A., Hills, A., Hintsa, E. J., Hodzic, A., Hornbrook, R. S., Huey, L. G., Jiménez-Palacios, J. L., Keeling, R. F., Kim, M. J., Kupc, A., Lacey, F., Lait, L. R., Lamarque, J.-F., Liu, J., McKain, K., Meinardi, S., Miller, D. O., Montzka, S. A., Moore, F. L., Morgan, E. J., Murphy, D. M., Murray, L. T., Nault, B. A., Neuman, J. A., Nguyen, L., Gonzalez, Y., Rollins, A., Rosenlof, K., Sargent, M., Schill, G., Schwarz, J. P., St. Clair, J. M., Steenrod, S. D., Stephens, B. B., Strahan, S. E., Strode, S. A., Sweeney, C., Thames, A. B., Ullmann, K., Wagner, N., Weber, R., Weinzierl, B., Wennberg, P. O., Williamson, C. J., Wolfe, G. M., and Zeng, L.:
The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E761–E790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0315.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0315.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
       Thompson, R. L., Montzka, S. A., Vollmer, M. K., Arduini, J., Crotwell, M., Krummel, P. B., Lunder, C., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Prinn, R. G., Reimann, S., Vimont, I., Wang, H., Weiss, R. F., and Young, D.:
Estimation of the atmospheric hydroxyl radical oxidative capacity using multiple hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1415–1427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1415-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1415-2024</a>, 2024. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
       Thornton, J. A., Braban, C. F., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> hydrolysis on sub-micron organic aerosols: The effect of relative humidity, particle phase, and particle size, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 4593–4603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B307498F" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B307498F</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
       Tie, X., Emmons, L., Horowitz, L., Brasseur, G., Ridley, B., Atlas, E., Hess, P., Klonecki, A., Madronich, S., Talbot, R., Dibb, J., Marbouty, D., and Hennessy, J.:
Effect of sulfate aerosol on tropospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and ozone budgets model simulations and TOPSE evidence, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001508" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001508</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
       Travis, K. R., Heald, C. L., Allen, H. M., Apel, E. C., Arnold, S. R., Blake, D. R., Brune, W. H., Chen, X., Commane, R., Crounse, J. D., Daube, B. C., Diskin, G. S., Elkins, J. W., Evans, M. J., Hall, S. R., Hintsa, E. J., Hornbrook, R. S., Kasibhatla, P. S., Kim, M. J., Luo, G., McKain, K., Millet, D. B., Moore, F. L., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Sherwen, T., Thames, A. B., Ullmann, K., Wang, X., Wennberg, P. O., Wolfe, G. M., and Yu, F.:
Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7753–7781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
       Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O., and Jacob, D. J.:
Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 5367–5372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616020114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616020114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
       Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., and Kort, E. A.:
Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 2805–2813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
       van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.:
Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</a>, 2017. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
       Voulgarakis, A., Naik, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Shindell, D. T., Young, P. J., Prather, M. J., Wild, O., Field, R. D., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R. M., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G. A., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.:
Analysis of present day and future OH and methane lifetime in the ACCMIP simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2563–2587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2563-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2563-2013</a>, 2013. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, H., Lu, X., Jacob, D. J., Cooper, O. R., Chang, K.-L., Li, K., Gao, M., Liu, Y., Sheng, B., Wu, K., Wu, T., Zhang, J., Sauvage, B., Nédélec, P., Blot, R., and Fan, S.:
Global tropospheric ozone trends, attributions, and radiative impacts in 1995–2017: an integrated analysis using aircraft (IAGOS) observations, ozonesonde, and multi-decadal chemical model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13753–13782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022</a>, 2022. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, S., Hornbrook, R. S., Hills, A., Emmons, L. K., Tilmes, S., Lamarque, J.-F., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Kim, M., Allen, H., Ryerson, T. B., Thompson, C. R., Peischl, J., Moore, F., Nance, D., Hall, B., Elkins, J., Tanner, D., Huey, L. G., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G. S., Flocke, F. M., Ray, E., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., St. Clair, J., Commane, R., Daube, B., Barletta, B., Blake, D. R., Weinzierl, B., Dollner, M., Conley, A., Vitt, F., Wofsy, S. C., Riemer, D. D., and Apel, E. C.:
Atmospheric acetaldehyde: Importance of air-sea exchange and a missing source in the remote troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5601–5613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082034</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
       Wild, O.:
Modelling the global tropospheric ozone budget: exploring the variability in current models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2643–2660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2643-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2643-2007</a>, 2007. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
       Wild, O. and Prather, M. J.:
Excitation of the primary tropospheric chemical mode in a global 3-D model, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24647–24660, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
       Wild, O., Voulgarakis, A., O'Connor, F., Lamarque, J.-F., Ryan, E. M., and Lee, L.:
Global sensitivity analysis of chemistry–climate model budgets of tropospheric ozone and OH: exploring model diversity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4047–4058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4047-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4047-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
       Wofsy, S., Afshar, S., Allen, H., Apel, E., Asher, E., Barletta, B., Bent, J., Bian, H., Biggs, B., Blake, D., Blake, N., Bourgeois, I., Brock, C., Brune, W., Budney, J., Bui, T., Butler, A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Chang, C., Chin, M., Commane, R., Correa, G., Crounse, J., Cullis, P., Daube, B., Day, D., Dean-Day, J., Dibb, J., DiGangi, J., Diskin, G., Dollner, M., Elkins, J., Erdesz, F., Fiore, A., Flynn, C., Froyd, K., Gesler, D., Hall, S., Hanisco, T., Hannun, R., Hills, A., Hintsa, E., Hoffman, A., Hornbrook, R., Huey, L., Hughes, S., Jimenez, J., Johnson, B., Katich, J., Keeling, R., Kim, M., Kupc, A., Lait, L., McKain, K., Mclaughlin, R., Meinardi, S., Miller, D., Montzka, S., Moore, F., Morgan, E., Murphy, D., Murray, L., Nault, B., Neuman, J., Newman, P., Nicely, J., Pan, X., Paplawsky, W., Peischl, J., Prather, M., Price, D., Ray, E., Reeves, J., Richardson, M., Rollins, A., Rosenlof, K., Ryerson, T., Scheuer, E., Schill, G., Schroder, J., Schwarz, J., St.Clair, J., Steenrod, S., Stephens, B., Strode, S., Sweeney, C., Tanner, D., Teng, A., Thames, A., Thompson, C., Ullmann, K., Veres, P., Wagner, N., Watt, A., Weber, R., Weinzierl, B., Wennberg, P., Williamson, C., Wilson, J., Wolfe, G., Woods, C., Zeng, L., and Vieznor, N.:
ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols, Version 2 (Version 2.0), ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1925" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1925</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
       Yang, M., Beale, R., Liss, P., Johnson, M., Blomquist, B., and Nightingale, P.:
Air–sea fluxes of oxygenated volatile organic compounds across the Atlantic Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7499–7517, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7499-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7499-2014</a>, 2014. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
       Yin, Y., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Broquet, G., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Pison, I., and Saunois, M.:
Decadal trends in global CO emissions as seen by MOPITT, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13433–13451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13433-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13433-2015</a>, 2015. 

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
       Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., Tilmes, S., Wild, O., Zhang, L., Ziemke, J., Brandt, J., Delcloo, A., Doherty, R. M., Geels, C., Hegglin, M. I., Hu, L., Im, U., Kumar, R., Luhar, A., Murray, L., Plummer, D., Rodriguez, J., Saiz-Lopez, A., Schultz, M. G., Woodhouse, M. T., and Zeng, G.:
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 6, 10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
       Zara, M., Boersma, K. F., De Smedt, I., Richter, A., Peters, E., van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Beirle, S., Wagner, T., Van Roozendael, M., Marchenko, S., Lamsal, L. N., and Eskes, H. J.:
Improved slant column density retrieval of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde for OMI and GOME-2A from QA4ECV: intercomparison, uncertainty characterisation, and trends, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4033–4058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4033-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4033-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Hauglustaine, D. A., Szopa, S., Stavert, A. R., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Bekki, S., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Marécal, V., O'Connor, F. M., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Zheng, B.:
Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13701–13723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Zheng, B.:
On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13011–13022, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhao, Y. H., Zheng, B., Saunois, M., Ciais, P., Michaela I. Hegglin, M. I., Lu, S. M., Li, Y. F., and Bousquet, P.:
Air pollution modulates trends and variability of the global methane budget, Nature, 642, 369–375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09004-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09004-z</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
       Zheng, B., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Yin, Y., Deeter, M. N., Worden, H. M., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., and He, K.:
Rapid decline in carbon monoxide emissions and export from East Asia between years 2005 and 2016, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 044007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2b3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2b3</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
       Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., Duncan, B. N., Froidevaux, L., Bhartia, P. K., Levelt, P. F., and Waters, J. W.:
Tropospheric ozone determined from Aura OMI and MLS: Evaluation of measurements and comparison with the Global Modeling Initiative's Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D19303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007089</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
       Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Strode, S. A., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., McPeters, R. D., Bhartia, P. K., Froidevaux, L., Labow, G. J., Witte, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Haffner, D. P., Kramarova, N. A., Frith, S. M., Huang, L.-K., Jaross, G. R., Seftor, C. J., Deland, M. T., and Taylor, S. L.:
Trends in global tropospheric ozone inferred from a composite record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS satellite measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3257–3269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
