<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-13595-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Origin of low ozone above western North America: an investigation of sources and trends</article-title><alt-title>Origin of low ozone above western North America: an investigation of sources and trends</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ryoo</surname><given-names>Ju-Mee</given-names></name>
          <email>ju-mee.ryoo@nasa.gov</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Iraci</surname><given-names>Laura T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2859-5259</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff7">
          <name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>Yu Yan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Cooper</surname><given-names>Owen R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>Matthew S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>Kai-Lan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5812-3183</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Yates</surname><given-names>Emma L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Thouret</surname><given-names>Valerie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>Hanna</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5602-5328</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Nedelec</surname><given-names>Philippe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Sauvage</surname><given-names>Bastien</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3410-2139</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Earth Science Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Moffett Field, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Laboratoire d'Aérologie (LAERO), Université Toulouse III – Paul Sabatier, CNRS, 31400 Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ju-Mee Ryoo (ju-mee.ryoo@nasa.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>18</issue>
      <fpage>13595</fpage><lpage>13615</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Ju-Mee Ryoo et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e218">While free-tropospheric ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over western North America (WNA) has increased since the mid-1990s, research has primarily focused on the mean. We investigate the lower tail (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentile) to characterize the evolving remote background state. Because these air masses are minimally affected by episodic extremes, they offer a clearer window into long-term shifts in background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, transport, and photochemistry. Using FLEXPART-ERA5 source–receptor relationships (SRRs) from 1994 to 2021, we analyze the transport history of air masses reaching WNA (25–55° N, 130–90° W). Despite no robust SRR trends within the lower and mid-troposphere (0–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), changing emission patterns suggest an intensifying remote influence. Specifically, WNA's surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions have decreased while lower-tail <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> continues to rise, aligning with increasing surface emissions from Southeast Asia and intensified shipping. In contrast, UTLS (8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) SRRs show a clear increase, indicating growing influence from high-altitude sources, including enhanced transport from Southeast Asia and the tropical Pacific, and rising global aircraft emissions. GMI chemical simulations corroborate these findings, revealing that net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production over Southeast Asia increased by 157 % in the lower troposphere and 7 % in the free troposphere between 2007 and 2019. The rise in WNA's low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> percentiles is driven by the combined influence of intensified transport from Southeast Asia and the tropical Pacific, along with increasing global aircraft and shipping emissions. Ultimately, these trends reflect both the rapid growth of Southeast Asia emissions and shifting trans-Pacific transport.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Aeronautics and Space Administration</funding-source>
<award-id>20-ACCDAM20-0083</award-id>
<award-id>SMD-20-28429430</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</funding-source>
<award-id>NA22OAR4320151</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e331">Tropospheric ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is an important trace gas because it has harmful impacts on human health and vegetation (Brauer et al., 2016; Fleming et al., 2018; Malashock et al., 2022; Mills et al., 2018). It is also an important greenhouse gas (Lacis et al., 1981; Ramaswamy, 2001; Gulev et al., 2021) categorized as a short-lived climate forcer (Szopa et al., 2021). Thus, it is essential to monitor tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends, analyze <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources and sinks, and understand the associated atmospheric transport patterns and pathways.</p>
      <p id="d2e367">The first phase of the Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR) and the sixth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report concluded that surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has increased by 30 % to 70 % in the mid- and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) from the mid-20th century to the present day (Tarasick et al., 2019; Gulev et al., 2021). This finding aligns with ensembles of global atmospheric chemistry models that show increasing tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at northern mid-latitudes, primarily driven by fossil fuel combustion and emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor gases (e.g., nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nitric oxide <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nitrogen dioxide <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), volatile organic compounds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOCs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), carbon monoxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), methane, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Szopa et al., 2021; Gulev et al., 2021; Fiore et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d2e483">Since the mid-1990s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has increased in the free troposphere of the NH tropics and mid-latitudes (Verstraeten et al., 2015; Cooper et al., 2014, 2020, 2024; Gaudel et al., 2020; Gulev et al., 2021; Wang  et al., 2022a; Chang et al., 2022, 2023a, 2024; Elshorbany et al., 2024; Froidevaux et al., 2025; van Malderen et al., 2025), although trends at the surface are highly variable (Cooper et al., 2020; Chang et al., 2023a, 2025; Putero et al., 2023). In particular, positive free-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends have been noted at the low end of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution, for example at the 1st, 5th or 33rd percentiles, which have been observed in the tropics and the mid-latitudes of the NH (Cooper et al., 2010; Cohen et al., 2018; Gaudel et al., 2020; Chang et al., 2023a).</p>
      <p id="d2e519">Understanding the lower tail end of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution is critical as it is an important component of background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Furthermore, because low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air masses are minimally affected by episodic processes – such as stratospheric intrusions and localized urban plumes – they provide a clearer view into long-term changes in background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, transport, and photochemistry. This perspective is particularly important given the observed increase at the “clean” end of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution. Analyzing IAGOS data from 1995 to 2013, Cohen et al. (2018) found that positive trends in the northern mid-latitude upper troposphere are driven by a significant rise in the lowest percentiles, a shift consistent with previous findings (Cooper et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2015). Very low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios observed in the mid- and upper-troposphere of the mid-latitudes also originate in the lower troposphere of remote tropical regions, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production is relatively low (Davies et al., 1998, Grant et al., 2000; Asman et al., 2003; Cooper et al., 2010; Chang et al., 2020; Gaudel et al., 2020). A range of atmospheric chemistry model simulations indicates that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production has increased in the lower troposphere of the western North Pacific Ocean, a region that was once dominated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction (Zhang et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2017; Gaudel et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022a).</p>
      <p id="d2e623">As tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an important greenhouse gas and air pollutant, understanding the changes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in remote regions of the world, especially in regions where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> destruction once dominated, improves our understanding of the global tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budget. This area of research also improves our understanding of the baseline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels that are advected into populated regions (Ryoo et al., 2017; Jaffe et al., 2018; Colombi et al., 2023), which impact surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Lin et al., 2017) and contribute to health impacts related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure at high and moderate concentrations (U.S. EPA, 2020, 2023; WHO, 2021).</p>
      <p id="d2e704">This analysis provides an update on tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends above Western North America (WNA) and explores the recent changes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production above Asia and the western North Pacific Ocean on the lower tail <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values advected into WNA. The primary goal of this paper is to identify the origin of the air parcels containing the lower magnitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above WNA, to understand how the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values have changed over time, and to identify whether the observed trends are driven by transport, precursor emissions, or chemical processes. We aim to answer the following three science questions: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e765">Where does the low O<sub>3</sub> above WNA come from?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e778">Have the transport pathways affecting O<sub>3</sub> over WNA changed?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e791">Have changes in O<sub>3</sub> occurred due to chemical production?</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e803">We utilized a Lagrangian particle dispersion model to investigate trends (1994–2021; 28-year) in transport pathways of the air parcels influencing low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels above WNA and employed the Global Model Initiative (GMI) dataset (Rotman et al., 2001; Ziemke et al., 2019) and Tropospheric Chemistry Reanalysis version 2 (TCR-2) chemical reanalysis (Miyazaki et al., 2019a, 2020) to analyze changes in net chemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in upwind source regions. For trend analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor emissions, we also used the bottom-up Community Emissions Data System (CEDS; Hoesly et al., 2018; McDuffie et al., 2020) inventory for aircraft and anthropogenic emission datasets.</p>
      <p id="d2e839">The paper is structured as follows: Sect. 2 outlines the data and methodology employed in the study. Section 3 presents the results, and Sect. 4 discusses the implications of the results and their broader significance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and Methodology</title>
      <p id="d2e851">This study examines WNA (25–55° N, 130–90° W) from 1994 to 2021 (28 years). Detailed data and methodology are presented below.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>FLEXPART- ERA5 (1994–2021) model output</title>
      <p id="d2e861">We utilize the FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model (FLEXPART) version 10.4 (Pisso et al., 2019), using meteorology from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5). ERA5 is a fifth-generation ECMWF atmospheric meteorological reanalysis of the global atmosphere at hourly temporal resolution (Hersbach et al., 2020). Hourly and monthly data were available on a 0.25° longitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25° latitude grid with 137 vertical levels ranging from 1000 to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We utilized 3-D wind (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), temperature, pressure, and other surface quantities (Cui et al.,2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e895">FLEXPART–ERA5 generated the source–receptor relationship (SRR) quantity used in this study, which can be applied to represent the air mass residence time at specific times and grid locations. Thus, this is often referred to as the “<italic>surface influence factor</italic>”, “<italic>residence time</italic>”, or “<italic>retroplume</italic>” (e.g., Cooper et al., 2010; Cui et al., 2025). In this study, we refer to the SRR as residence time. A high SRR indicates a strong connection between the upwind source region and the observation location. These high SRR values indicate long residence time over source regions, resulting in greater surface emission influence, while a low SRR represents a weak connection between source regions and observations due to short residence times. The model is used to support our 28-year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis from 1994 to 2021, providing a set of outputs at hourly resolution extending from the observational <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> receptors back 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° spatial resolution globally (Cui et al., 2025). To track the vertical range of the SRR of trajectories associated with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observation over WNA, we classify the trajectory layers into five vertical levels: 0–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 3–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 13–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These five levels refer to the retroplume assessment levels associated with observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values over WNA, regardless of the original <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement altitude. While the raw data contain detailed receptor and retroplume information (Cui et al., 2025), only retroplume data are retained when processing daily and monthly data.</p>
      <p id="d2e1027">The five vertical layers from the surface to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are designed to support the investigation of the different sources associated with different altitudes and to understand their source contributions. To differentiate between source contributions, we utilize specific vertical layers: the 0–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.3–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges quantify the respective contributions of surface-level and planetary boundary layer (PBL) emissions. The 3–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column accounts for the influence of lightning-induced ozone formation, while the 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range isolates the impact of aircraft emissions on downwind WNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. The output unit of the SRR from the FLEXPART–ERA5 backward model simulation is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which represents the SRR weighted by the air mass volume. For more detailed model processing information, please see Cui et al. (2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e1105">Daily output with 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> back-trajectories is aggregated into monthly data by normalizing the total SRR by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> receptor observations. Although our initial daily output spans the globe, we restrict our monthly analysis to the NH to reduce computational demands. We justify this by assuming that interhemispheric transport contributes relatively little to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels over WNA. To represent different atmospheric layers, the 0–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges were categorized as the lower troposphere, the 3–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range as the free troposphere, the 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range as the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS), and the 13–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range as the stratosphere in the tropics and mid-latitude region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Observational receptors and source regions selection</title>
      <p id="d2e1195">We used a data fusion technique to combine multi-platform <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations across 900–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above WNA (25–55° N, 130–90° W, Fig. 1a–c), to establish our receptor list over WNA (Chang et al., 2023a; Cui et al., 2025). Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations over WNA during 1994–2021 used in this study include (1) <italic>Ozonesonde measurements</italic> provided by the Canadian Ozonesonde Network (Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2022), and from the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (NOAA GML, 2022), (2) <italic>Lidar measurements</italic> from Table Mountain (NASA JPL 2022), and (3) <italic>Aircraft measurements from IAGOS</italic> (In-Service Aircraft for a Global Observing System; Boulanger et al., 2022) and NASA AJAX/SNAX (Iraci and Yates, 2021; Yates et al., 2023). The availability of the observation periods varies slightly among the measurement sites during our study period from 1994–2021 (please refer to Fig. 1 of Cui et al., 2025 for more details). These efforts aim to enhance accuracy and precision of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend estimates, building on earlier findings that sparse ozonesonde sampling – typically once per week – is insufficient for capturing accurate monthly means (Logan, 1999) or detecting reliable trends (Prinn, 1988). These findings were further evaluated and validated by using the densely sampled IAGOS dataset above Frankfurt, Germany (Chang et al., 2020; Saunois et al., 2012). More recently, Chang et al. (2024) demonstrated that trend estimates can vary significantly with sampling strategies, showing notable biases under sparse conditions. Gaudel et al. (2024) likewise emphasized the difficulty of detecting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in the tropics due to limited in-situ observations.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1262">Trends and uncertainty in observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and chemical reanalysis <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions: <bold>(a, b)</bold> Map of 2-D horizontal and 3-D vertical distribution of observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (circle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over WNA used in this study (1994–2021). <bold>(c)</bold> Time series and trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade) of the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5th percentile (gray) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentile (light blue)) from 1994 to 2021. <bold>(d)</bold> Time series of monthly anomalies and trends (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade) with uncertainty (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 standard errors) in TCR-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over SE Asia (solid red), NE Asia (solid cyan), Siberia (solid green), the tropical Pacific (dashed blue), and WNA (gray dash-dotted) from 2005 to 2021. Shading in panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> denotes the 95 % confidence intervals of the trends.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1388">We focus on four major source regions affecting the levels over WNA: SE Asia (0–25° N, 60–130° E), NE Asia (26–46° N, 75–127° E), Siberia (50–75° N, 70–160° E), and Tropical Pacific Ocean (hereafter Tropical Pacific; 5–35° N, 180° E–130° W) because, (1) these regions reflect differing emission distributions linked to growing industries and emission control strategies (Zhang et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2019), (2) these regions are well known for significantly contributing to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor sources and sinks (Thorp et al., 2021), and (3) hemispheric-scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production and loss and its transport (Jacob et al., 1999; Cooper et al., 2010), and biomass burning emissions transport acting as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor species often affect WNA through long-range transport (Johnson et al., 2021) from various vertical ranges (Ryoo et al., 2017). Although our “SE Asia” domain (0–25° N,  60–130° E) spans South Asia (including India and Pakistan), Southeast Asia (Indochina and maritime states), and southern East Asia, this macro-scale boundary was intentionally chosen to capture broad, interconnected transport pathways. Strong transboundary mixing across these neighboring zones (e.g., Samphutthanont et al., 2026) makes separating individual sub-regional signatures difficult over multi-day trajectories. Therefore, this domain is designed to capture the overarching regional transport footprint and ensure solid statistical sampling, rather than pinpoint localized source areas. In this analysis, we also selected the Tropical Pacific as a potential source region due to high SRR and close proximity to WNA. For examining anthropogenic shipping emissions, we categorize the domain into three oceanic regions – Tropical Indian (0–30° N, 60–150° E), Tropical Pacific (5–35° N, 180° E–130° W), and mid-latitude western Pacific (30–55° N, 127–152° E). More details are shown in Sect. 3.3.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Other datasets</title>
      <p id="d2e1432"><list list-type="order">
            <list-item>

      <p id="d2e1437"><italic>GMI O</italic><sub><italic>3</italic></sub> <italic>chemical production and loss data.</italic> we utilized the GMI data for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S1 in the Supplement), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S2), and chemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production and loss to examine net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production (Rotman et al., 2001; Ziemke et al., 2019). The GMI simulations employed the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2; Gelaro et al., 2017) reanalysis meteorology and a combined stratospheric-tropospheric chemical mechanism. GMI simulations have been widely used in various tropospheric studies to interpret observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, analyze observed trends (Ziemke et al., 2019), and investigate processes influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kerr et al., 2021; Strode et al., 2015, 2016). We focused on the period from 1994 to 2019. The spatial resolution is 0.625° longitude by 0.5° latitude and monthly temporal resolution.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>

      <p id="d2e1534"><italic>TCR-2 NO</italic><sub><italic>x</italic></sub> <italic>emission data.</italic> the Tropospheric Chemistry Reanalysis version 2 (TCR-2) chemical reanalysis (Miyazaki et al., 2019a, 2020) constrained by satellite chemical observations provides a broad range of chemical components, including surface concentrations of various species including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and anthropogenic and natural (e.g., lightning, biomass burning) emissions (Lahoz and Schneider, 2014). TCR-2 data have been evaluated against independent observations (e.g., Miyazaki et al., 2019b; Thompson et al., 2019). We utilize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission data across multiple sectors – including surface anthropogenic, lightning, and biomass burning sources (Figs. 1d and S2) – to demonstrate that the rising <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over WNA is likely driven by remote transport rather than local emissions. Specifically, while surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over WNA has trended downward, the lower tail of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution shows an increase (Fig. 1c and d), suggesting a disconnect between local precursor trends and the evolving remote background. The spatial resolution of the data is 1.125° longitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.125° latitude, with monthly data available from 2005 to 2021.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>

      <p id="d2e1627"><italic>CEDS anthropogenic and aircraft NO</italic><sub><italic>x</italic></sub><italic> emissions.</italic> the Community Earth atmospheric Data System (CEDS) emissions inventory was used to estimate anthropogenic and aircraft <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over the source regions (Smith et al., 2015). The system focuses on emissions of aerosol (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), gases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor compounds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The inventory resolution is monthly, 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5° spatial resolution, and 25 altitude levels, ranging from 0.305 to 14.495 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above sea level (Hoesly et al., 2018; McDuffie et al., 2020).</p>
            </list-item>
          </list></p>
      <p id="d2e1759">Data from the GMI model and TCR-2 chemical reanalysis were applied to assess trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S1) and its precursor species such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 1d and S2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Analysis Methodology</title>
      <p id="d2e1793">The number of receptors varies across years due to sampling differences in observational data availability. To account for this variability, we normalized the monthly SRRs by dividing the total SRRs from the receptors by the total receptor count for each month across different altitudes. Monthly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration percentiles from 1994 to 2021 were then defined relative to the monthly percentiles determined during the 2004–2014 baseline period. This period was selected as a representative baseline for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at receptors over WNA because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sampling during this time was relatively evenly distributed.</p>
      <p id="d2e1829">We categorized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values based on the following percentiles: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5th percentile, 5th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentile, 33rd <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50th percentile, 50th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66th percentile, 66th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95th percentile, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95th percentile. We defined low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the 33rd percentile threshold, as SRR patterns were largely similar to those below the 5th percentile. To avoid the air masses with the strongest impact from stratospheric intrusion, we also excluded the 95–100th percentiles in our analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e1993">The total number of monthly non-zero SRRs across the full range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from 1994 to 2021 was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 539 808 out of 553 608 total gridded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observation (Cui et al., 2025). Of this total, the number of SRRs associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values below the 5th percentile and the 33rd percentile is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 858 and 173 538, respectively, while those above the 66th percentile total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 187 597, across all vertical layers. Those for high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (66th–95th percentile), excluding the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels that are typically associated with recent stratospheric intrusions, is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 160 299.</p>
      <p id="d2e2109">To analyze trends in airmass transport associated with particular <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels above WNA, as represented by SRR, we applied a linear regression model. For each month, the monthly SRR values corresponding to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> percentile ranges, as described in Sect. 2.1, were input into the linear regression model, formulated as follows:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M173" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SRR</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is longitude, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is latitude, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the five vertical layers, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a monthly mean cycle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the trend coefficient, which is shown in the results, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the total 336 months (12 months <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28 years), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the residual term. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of the trend estimate was used to assess the trend reliably. We adopted the TOAR statistical guidelines where a trend with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 is considered to be high certainty (Chang et al., 2023b; Wasserstein et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d2e2314">Monthly average SRRs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) were first calculated for the five vertical layers at each longitude and latitude grid point from 1994 to 2021. Trends were then determined using a deseasonalized dataset, by subtracting the 28-year mean for each month (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the corresponding monthly SRR (e.g., for January 2010, the anomaly was calculated by subtracting the average of each January from 1994 to 2021 from the January 2010 value). Similarly, the trend of net GMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production is also computed following Eq. (1). Net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production was estimated by subtracting all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss terms from all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production terms, based on the GMI dataset.</p>
      <p id="d2e2391">The percentage change in chemical net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">netp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is calculated in Eq. (2) based on the difference in the averages of the two periods (P1: 1994–2006 and P2: 2007–2019) normalized by their combined average during the P1 period:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M193" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">netp</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">netp</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>P2</mml:mtext><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2007</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2019</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">netp</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>P1</mml:mtext><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1994</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2006</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>abs</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">netp</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>P1</mml:mtext><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1994</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2006</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2538"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">netp</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1994</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2006</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the average net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production for P1, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">netp</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2007</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2019</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the average net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production for P2 for the specified four source regions over the free and lower troposphere, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e2612">To quantify the spatial influence of different source regions on low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels over WNA, we calculated the normalized mean density (we call this as “relative intensity”). This value represents the mean SRR of air masses with positive net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production for a specific region, normalized against the hemispheric average (0–90° N) – SE Asia, NE Asia, Siberia, and the Tropical Pacific – during two time periods: P1 (1994–2006) and P2 (2007–2021). These values were derived from two-dimensional joint probability density functions (2D joint PDFs), estimated using a non-parametric, gaussian kernel density estimation (KDE) method, to estimate the PDF of a variable (Chen, 2017), implemented via the SciPy library in Python v3.7. Specifically, the relative intensity of region <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during a given time was computed as (KDE (region <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, time) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> KDE (total, time)) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 (%), where region <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> {SE Asia, NE Asia, Siberia, Tropical Pacific}.</p>
      <p id="d2e2680">Results were also tested across multiple bandwidths (i.e., smoothing parameters for KDE). The optimal bandwidth values were determined using the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) method, also implemented via the SciPy library. This approach minimizes the estimated error of the KDE by iteratively computing the density estimator on all but one data point and then evaluating its ability to obtain the density of the left-out point, ultimately selecting the bandwidth that minimizes the total error across all data points. Uncertainty in the computed relative intensity for each sector was also assessed using bootstrap-estimated standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Where does the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> come from?</title>
      <p id="d2e2726">Figure 2 illustrates the SRR maps for low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentile) and high (66th-95th percentile) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations across the lower (0–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and middle (3–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) troposphere. SRR maps are intrinsically linked to trans-Pacific maritime transport and are heavily influenced by a mixture of maritime pathways, continental air masses, and source signatures (Ryoo et al., 2017). From the map, we identify distinct transport corridors associated with varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. In the lower troposphere (0–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air masses exhibit high SRR values, with their peaks and dispersions aligned specifically with the southern regions of East Asia and the tropical Pacific (Fig. 2a and c); SRR is higher in the red and gray boxed regions on the map). Conversely, elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are primarily associated with air masses transiting through NE Asia (Fig. 2c).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2807">Maps of the source–receptor relationship (SRR): (top) low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentile), and (bottom) high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (66th–95th percentile) over the WNA for <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>, 0–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level and <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> 3–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The red, blue, green, and gray boxes in <bold>(a)</bold> represent SE Asia (0–25° N, 60–130° E), NE Asia (26–46° N, 75–127° E), Siberia (50–75° N, 70–160° E), and Tropical Pacific (5–35° N, 180° E–130° W), respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2877">This latitudinal contrast is further amplified in the free troposphere (3–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). While SRR values are generally larger in this layer compared to the lower troposphere, the spatial patterns remain consistent (Fig. 2b and d). For lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> percentiles, air parcels predominantly traverse the tropical eastern Pacific and SE Asia. In contrast, higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> percentiles are linked to air masses with extended SRR in the midlatitudes (15–45° N), exhibiting transport pathways that originate or pass through NE Asia. Similar patterns were reported by Cooper et al. (2010), who showed distinct transport features corresponding to different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, particularly in springtime.</p>
      <p id="d2e2922">These characteristic transport dynamics are also evident on a seasonal basis: transport patterns weaken slightly and become more localized over WNA during boreal summer (June–August; JJA), whereas they strengthen during boreal spring (March–May; MAM) and boreal winter (December–February; DJF) (Fig. S4).</p>
      <p id="d2e2925">This seasonal behavior aligns with findings by Ansari et al. (2025), who utilized explicit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emission tagging to demonstrate an increasing influence of foreign anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and, to a lesser extent, global shipping <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, over the northwestern United States between 2000 and 2018. Similarly, Li et al. (2023a) used the same explicit dual-tagging technique and found increasing contributions of Asian <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions to Western US <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly during winter from 1995 to 2019, further supporting our analysis. Taken together, these findings confirm that the geographic origin of an air mass is a key driver of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability over WNA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Have transport pathways changed?</title>
      <p id="d2e3003">To examine transport trends on decadal scales, we analyze the SRR patterns for air parcels containing low free tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amounts over WNA. Figure 3 illustrates trends in the SRR of low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air parcels from the lower and the free troposphere to the UTLS. For low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SRRs show no clear trend in the lower troposphere (Fig. 3a and b) or in the free troposphere (Fig. 3c) in the regions of interest. In contrast, low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SRR exhibits an increasing tendency across all regions in the UTLS, though with large variability (Fig. 3d and e).</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3052">Trends in SRR over the interval 1994–2021. Panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(d)</bold> show SRR trends for low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5th to 33rd percentile range) over WNA for air parcels originating from four different layers: <bold>(a)</bold> 0–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> 3–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(d)</bold> 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Red colors identify regions of increasing influence. The dots on the maps represent the grid cells with a lower confidence value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). The red, blue, green, and gray boxes in <bold>(a)</bold> represent SE Asia, NE Asia, Siberia, and Tropical Pacific, respectively. Panel <bold>(e)</bold> shows the vertical distribution of SRR trends for four regions (SE Asia, NE Asia, Siberia, and Tropical Pacific) and four categories of ozone amount: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5th percentile, 5th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentiles, 66th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95th, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95th percentile. The trend values for the tropical Pacific are shown on the upper <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis (gray), while those for the other regions are shown on the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis (black). The shaded region in <bold>(e)</bold> represents the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 standard deviation (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of each trend value at the given level for the region. For ease of visualization, the mid-level height of each layer is shown on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis in panel <bold>(e)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3275">SRR for high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (66th–95th percentile, Fig. 3e) observations over WNA exhibit more positive trends and large variability. For example, SRR from NE Asia for high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, both in the lower troposphere and the free troposphere, shows a distinct increasing trend (Figs. 2c, d, 3e, and S3). Conversely, high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SRR shows a decreasing trend at higher latitudes (e.g., Siberia), while over the Tropical Pacific it exhibits increasing trend with substantial variability (Fig. 3e).</p>
      <p id="d2e3312">An increasing trend in the UTLS SRR of air masses is evident in Fig. 3 (8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 3d and e), influencing both low and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over WNA. Although the 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude range corresponds to the UTLS region and influences stratosphere-troposphere exchange (STE), it also intersects commercial flight corridors and regions of frequent lightning activity. Therefore, the upward SRR trend in the 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer cannot be uniquely attributed to STE. Furthermore, we intentionally excluded extreme O<sub>3</sub> events from our primary analysis to mitigate STE influence. Investigating whether this increasing SRR trend points to a potential rise in STE activity requires further study and is beyond the scope of this work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Are changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to changes in emissions or chemical production?</title>
      <p id="d2e3379">To further investigate the potential cause of increasing amounts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the lowest percentiles at 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we examine aircraft emissions averaged over 1994–2019, as shown in Fig. 4a. Notably, aircraft emissions – which have increased steadily across source regions (Fig. 4b) – typically peak within the 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range, coinciding with the primary cruising altitudes of commercial aviation. This finding aligns with Eastham et al. (2024), who demonstrated that the impact of civil aviation is driven primarily by a hemispheric-scale tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rather than by localized effects.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3433"><bold>(a)</bold> Vertical profiles of CEDS aircraft <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) averaged over 1994–2019. <bold>(b–e)</bold> Time series of monthly anomaly and their linear trends (lines, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade) with uncertainty (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 standard errors) of the CEDS aircraft <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in the UTLS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the four source regions during 1994–2019. Shading in <bold>(b)</bold>–<bold>(e)</bold> denotes 95 % confidence intervals.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3550">Beyond aviation emissions, we also find from GMI simulations that lightning-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows increasing patterns over SE Asia and North America within the free troposphere and UTLS (3–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (see Fig. 5 of Cui et al., 2025). These results further support the findings of Gressent et al. (2014), who identified additional sources – such as lightning-generated nitrogen oxides – as important contributors to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3586"><bold>(a)</bold> Maps of CEDS anthropogenic shipping <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for (top) P1 (1994–2006), (middle) P2 (2007–2019), and (bottom) the difference (P2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> P1). <bold>(b)</bold> Time series of shipping <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions for three source regions: the tropical Indian Ocean (0–30° N, 60–150° E; solid red), tropical Pacific (5–35° N, 180–130° W; dashed blue), and midlatitude western Pacific (30–55° N, 127–152° E; solid cyan). <bold>(c)</bold> Mean shipping emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(d)</bold> the contribution of shipping emissions to total anthropogenic emissions (%) over the three source regions during P1 and P2. The tropical Indian, tropical Pacific, and midlatitude western Pacific regions are indicated in red, blue, and cyan, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3688">While Fig. 3 shows an upward trend in transport from the tropical Pacific UTLS, the rise in low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over WNA is not solely driven by aircraft emissions. In fact, aircraft emissions are quite low in this specific area (Fig. 4a). This observation instead suggests the influence of other emission sources. To investigate additional anthropogenic emissions over our source regions, we particularly examined shipping emissions. As shown in Fig. 5, shipping emissions are high over the Tropical Indian Ocean (including the SE Asia region) and the Tropical Pacific (Li et al., 2023b). While the decrease in global shipping <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions around 2009 was likely not driven by a single factor, the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in 2009 has been reported to be partially associated with the 2008 global economic recession (Tong et al., 2016; Fig. 5b).</p>
      <p id="d2e3725">During the recent period (P2), total shipping emissions show a slight increase over the tropical Indian Ocean and the midlatitude western Pacific (including Northeast Asia), with minor changes over the tropical Pacific. Relative to total anthropogenic emissions, shipping contributes up to 10.9 %, 17.7 %, and 95.2 % in these regions, respectively, highlighting the growing role of shipping emissions there (Fig. 5d).</p>
      <p id="d2e3728">Given that both transport and chemical processes can influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels over WNA, we further analyze trends in net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical production to distinguish the role of chemical processes using GMI. Figure 6 represents the net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical production obtained by subtracting GMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss from GMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production across the NH and the four distinct regions (Fig. S1) in both the free troposphere and the lower troposphere. In the lower troposphere, net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production is typically an order of magnitude higher than in the free troposphere, with positive values occurring predominantly over densely populated regions of the NH, while net destruction is mainly observed over the tropical ocean (Fig. 6a and b).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3800"><bold>(a)</bold> Map of GMI net chemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the <bold>(a)</bold> free-troposphere (700–288.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> lower troposphere (725–985 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during 1994–2019. <bold>(c–e)</bold> Zonal-mean latitude–height cross sections of net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production during <bold>(c)</bold> the early period (P1: 1994–2006) and <bold>(d)</bold> the later period (P2: 2007–2019). <bold>(e)</bold> the difference from <bold>(d)</bold> to <bold>(c)</bold>; contours are smoothed by averaging within a 5° latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell. <bold>(f)</bold> relative percent change in zonal-mean GMI chemical net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production from P1 to P2.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3931">To further assess temporal changes in net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in the lower and free troposphere, we calculate the change in net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production between the early period (P1: 1994–2006) and the later period (P2: 2007–2019), as shown in Fig. 6e and f. The zonal-mean latitude–height cross sections of net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production during P1 and P2 reveal several key features: (i) a consistent positive net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production over 20–35° N in the lower troposphere during both periods (Figs. S5 and S6); (ii) a notable increase in net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in the extended upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric region in recent years (pink color in Fig. 6e centered around 20° N and around 300–150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (P2, Fig. S6), along with a decrease in net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production over the tropical Pacific (green color extending up from the surface, centered on the equator). These results are broadly consistent with Archibald et al. (2020), who reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production from the UK Chemistry and Aerosol Community Climate Model (UKCA; Luhar et al., 2018) for the year 2000. However, slight differences in the magnitude and pattern of extratropical zonal-mean net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production may stem from our study's longer analysis period (1994–2019) and the use of a different model. During the later period (P2), a significant increase and positive trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">netp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production difference) is observed, particularly at the low-tropospheric level over NE and SE Asia (Fig. S5), with the rate reaching up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 157 % over SE Asia (Fig. 6f).</p>
      <p id="d2e4067"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> net production and destruction vary significantly by region (Fig. 6a and b), influenced by a combination of natural and human-caused factors. A study led by Thorp et al. (2021), for instance, found that in western Siberia, surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is controlled by a dynamic interplay of seasonal atmospheric transport patterns, a dominant sink from dry deposition by forest vegetation, and the prevalence of anthropogenic emissions from the transport and energy sectors. However, note that this is the net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in a particular model grid cell, and does not account for transport from the stratosphere, surface deposition or transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from one region to another.</p>
      <p id="d2e4113">Overall, Fig. 6 suggests that chemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">netp</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over East Asia has shown a significant increase in recent years, particularly over SE Asia in the lower troposphere. To investigate the temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in more extended vertical layers, Fig. 7 illustrates the trends for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the three vertical layers. In the tropics, tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits an overall increasing trend, particularly over East Asia, consistent with the findings of Ziemke et al. (2019).</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e4168">GMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade) in the <bold>(a)</bold> UTLS (244.88–176.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> free troposphere (700–288.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <bold>(c)</bold> lower troposphere (725–985 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) calculated from 1994 and 2019. The dots on the maps represent the grid cells with a lower confidence value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). The pressure shown here represents the midpoint of each GMI model level.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4244">In the UTLS (Fig. 7a), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rates tend to increase at high latitudes, partially reflecting the influence of stratospheric processes. Conversely, large variability is observed in the extratropics due to a complex interplay between dynamic processes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry (Cooper et al., 2004; Bak et al., 2025). The pattern is different in the free troposphere with positive trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across most of the NH. Strongest increases stretch from South and East Asia across the North Pacific Ocean to WNA, while decreases are limited to the equatorial region (Fig. 7b). The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> growth rate in the free troposphere and the decrease in the lower troposphere shown in Fig. 7 are overall consistent with and supported by observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends (Chang et al., 2023a; Fig. S1). In addition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows increases over SE Asia and the Pacific Ocean but decreases over North America, aligning with IAGOS dataset trends reported by Gaudel et al. (2020). Similar patterns are also found in net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production trends (Figs. S5–S7).</p>
      <p id="d2e4326">The schematics in Fig. 8 summarize our findings on the key regions contributing to low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over WNA. Regional net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production analysis indicates that SE Asia's contribution to low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentile) levels over WNA – driven by both SRR and chemical production – has intensified in recent years (P2: 2007–2021) compared to the earlier period (P1: 1994–2006). This increase is most pronounced in the lower troposphere, where relative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rose by approximately 23 % (Fig. 8b), with the highest positive net production centered over SE and NE Asia (Fig. S6). While net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production from SE Asia also increased within the free troposphere, the magnitude of change was less substantial (Fig. 8b). In contrast, the UTLS exhibits positive net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production across nearly all regions. This widespread increase is linked to rising aircraft emissions (Fig. 4) and enhanced SRR (Fig. 3) – a result consistent with the hemispheric-scale response described by Eastham et al. (2024). Notably, the tropical Pacific also shows entirely positive net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production within this upper layer.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4416"><bold>(a)</bold> Trends in low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> net production and transport (1994–2019). Decadal trends in net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade) and transport (SRR; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per decade) specifically for the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentile) over western North America (WNA). <bold>(b)</bold> Normalized mean density of net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production associated with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentile) SRR, shown relative to the NH total across the (left) UTLS, (center) free troposphere, and (right) lower troposphere. Data are grouped by early (P1: 1994–2006; blue hatched) and later (P2: 2007–2019; brown hatched) periods, with their difference (P2–P1; green). Error bars indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> via bootstrap resampling.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/13595/2026/acp-26-13595-2026-f08.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e4573">There have been many studies linking rising emissions and increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropics. Zhang et al. (2016) showed that increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in the tropics is driving the increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at mid-latitudes. This is consistent with our finding that positive net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production is also found across the UTLS, free-, and low tropospheric tropical region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5° N; Figs. 6 and 8). We also found that the influence of transport (SRR) tends to increase in the UTLS region for cases of both low and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amounts (see Fig. 3).</p>
      <p id="d2e4639">Our analysis included the subtropical and mid-latitude regions, where atmospheric dynamics are more complex and not solely driven by convection, providing a broader, potentially dynamic impact on tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lin et al., 2014, 2015, 2017; Xue et al., 2021; Oman et al., 2011; 2013, Chandra et al., 1998; Ziemke et al., 2015; Cooper et al., 2013; Jeong et al., 2023). In this context, we also investigated the potential role of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Quasi Biannual Oscillation (QBO) effects on SRR and their impact on low tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over WNA, but with SRR only, we could not detect a significant influence (not shown). However, the role of emissions sectors, photochemical reactions during transport, climate variability, and meteorological factors (Xue et al., 2021) in both local and long-range transport warrants further exploration in future studies.</p>
      <p id="d2e4664">While we did not conduct a detailed investigation of seasonal variability in SRR, it was evident that SRR patterns shift northward from DJF (December–January–February) to JJA (June–July–August) due to synoptic variability and changes in the jet stream position (Figs. S8 and S9). For example, peak SRR and its variability align with the subtropical jet in DJF (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30° N) but shift to the mid-latitude jet in JJA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45° N) (Fig. S9). Extended SRR and transport near the jet location are closely linked to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonality and variability. This aligns with Barnes and Fiore (2013), who found that a poleward shift in the jet stream results in a similar poleward shift in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability, with lower standard deviations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels farther from the jet. The application of FLEXPART-ERA5 SRRs, along with our analysis method, could serve as a framework for future studies to further investigate seasonal variations in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends over WNA.</p>
      <p id="d2e4726">Regarding the increase in chemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production, the increase in SE and NE Asia emissions, as shown in Fig. 6, coincides with a rapid rise in methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations (Nisbet et al., 2016, 2019). This trend may be linked to the overall increase in emissions across Asia (Kurokawa and Ohara, 2020) and a possible suppression of hydroxyl radical (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) levels during that period. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> feedback mechanism could have further contributed to rising <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Zhao et al., 2020; He et al., 2026). However, given that the response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases is relatively slow and modest (Fiore et al., 2008), further investigation is also needed. The chemical pathways involved in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation are more complex and require further studies.</p>
      <p id="d2e4825">As discussed in Fig. 6, the increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in SE Asia is closely linked to rising anthropogenic emissions (Wang et al., 2022b; Li et al., 2023b; Li et al., 2024) and can largely be attributed to shipping as well as biomass burning (Fig. S2). A recent study by Liu et al. (2024) highlights the significant roles of biomass burning and urbanization in increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over South, SE, and East Asia. Their findings, based on Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) observations, indicate that biomass burning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission levels are nearly double those reported in existing model inventories. As shown in Fig. S2, however, biomass-burning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from TCR-2 is relatively smaller than that from other sources, suggesting its overall impact is likely limited, although a more quantitative analysis is needed to assess its quantitative effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e4892">We investigated the spatial and chemical origins of air parcels with observed low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over western North America (WNA; 25–55° N, 130–90° W) using the FLEXPART-ERA5 model for the period 1994–2021. We found that air masses associated with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> primarily originate from the tropical Pacific and Southeast (SE) Asia. While no clear long-term trends were identified in the source–receptor relationships (SRRs) for the lower and free troposphere, SRRs increased in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This enhancement increases the potential influence of lightning (Cui et al., 2025) and aircraft emissions on low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions over WNA.</p>
      <p id="d2e4943">Consistent with recent increases in aircraft emissions, the contribution of aviation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over WNA under low-ozone conditions has strengthened. In addition, between 2007 and 2019, Global Model Initiative (GMI) simulations show a notable increase in net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical production over SE Asia, increasing up to 157 % in the lower troposphere and 7 % in the free troposphere. Furthermore, increasing SRRs from FLEXPART-ERA5 associated with positive net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical production over SE and Northeast (NE) Asia in the UTLS and free troposphere partially explain the observed increase in low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over WNA.</p>
      <p id="d2e4990">Another key novel contribution of our study is the focus on distinct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (based on percentiles) rather than the entire <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution, with the significant finding that in the free troposphere, ozone amounts over WNA are increasing in even the smallest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> percentiles – a trend closely linked to rising emissions in SE Asia. For example, during 2007–2021, the positive net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production associated with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33rd percentile) has increased by about 23 % over SE Asia in the lower troposphere. Additionally, we found consistently positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production over the Tropical Pacific, with longer SRR affecting lesser <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values over WNA. This coincides with increasing shipping emissions in the lower troposphere and aircraft emissions in the UTLS of the tropical Pacific.</p>
      <p id="d2e5079">We also extend the springtime analysis of Cooper et al. (2010) by incorporating the whole year (Fig. S3 with providing seasonal variation) and a longer study period, demonstrating a continuing trend of Asian emission influence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels over WNA. Our findings also highlight a distinctly different transport pattern, with enhanced transport from NE Asia contributing to high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels over WNA. Furthermore, our combined analysis of SRR and chemical processes underscores the importance of monitoring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport in conjunction with changes in atmospheric circulation, long-range transport, and shifts in both local and remote anthropogenic emissions at regional and global scales.</p>
      <p id="d2e5116">Finally, the gridded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> database developed in this study – derived from a wide range of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements (900–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and combined with backward Lagrangian transport model simulations using FLEXPART-ERA5 (Cui et al., 2025) – enables investigation of the source regions associated with different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> percentiles observed over WNA.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5164">The data used in this study are openly available at the following URL/DOI: ERA5 meteorological reanalysis data are available from the Copernicus Climate Change Service (<uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets</uri>, last access: 15 September 2026). The Tropospheric Chemistry Reanalysis (TCR-2) data for 2005–2021 is freely available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25966/9qgv-fe81" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25966/9qgv-fe81</ext-link> (Miyazaki et al., 2019a). The MERRA-2 GMI simulation is available at <uri>https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Projects/GEOSCCM/MERRA2GMI/</uri> (last access: 15 September 2026) (Ziemke et al., 2019) CEDS Aircraft Emissions (Version 2021-04-21) gridded over a 0.5° latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5° longitude grid, with 25 altitude levels are available on <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7846185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7846185</ext-link> (Prime et al., 2023). The FLEXPART-ERA5 model outputs both daily and monthly data, associated receptor data, and post-processing scripts is available at NASA's ASDC (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/ASDC/WNA-BackTraj" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/ASDC/WNA-BackTraj</ext-link>, Cui et al., 2025).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5190">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13595-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13595-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5199">LI, JR, YC, MJ, and OC conceptualized and designed the research. YC and JR carried out the experiments, with initial field data collected and processed by KC and EY. YC developed and executed the model simulations, while JR conducted the data analysis and visualization. JR prepared the manuscript with contributions and revisions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5205">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5211">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5217">This work is supported at NASA Ames Research Center. We thank the NASA ACCDAM program for providing support and resources (20-ACCDAM20-0083). The authors would like to acknowledge the NASA High-End Computing (HEC) Program through the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division at Ames Research Center (award SMD-20-28429430). Kai-Lan Chang acknowledges additional support from NOAA cooperative agreement NA22OAR4320151. IAGOS data were created with support from the European Commission, national agencies in Germany (BMBF), France (MESR), and the UK (NERC), and the IAGOS member institutions (<uri>https://www.iagos.org/</uri>, last access: 15 September 2026). The participating airlines (Lufthansa, Air France, Austrian, China Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Air Canada, Iberia, Eurowings Discover, Cathay Pacific, Air Namibia, Sabena) supported IAGOS by carrying the measurement equipment free of charge since 1994. The data are available at <uri>http://www.iagos.fr</uri> (last access: 15 September 2026)  thanks to additional support from AERIS. We also acknowledge NASA Award 80NSSC23M0230.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5228">This research has been supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant nos. 20-ACCDAM20-0083 and SMD-20-28429430) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (grant no. NA22OAR4320151).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5234">This paper was edited by Benjamin A Nault and reviewed by Juseon Bak and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Ansari, T., Nalam, A., Lupaşcu, A., Hinz, C., Grasse, S., and Butler, T.: Explaining trends and changing seasonal cycles of surface ozone in North America and Europe over the 2000–2018 period: a global modelling study with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC tagging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 16833–16876, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16833-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-16833-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Deushi, M., Finco, A., Frost, G. J., Galbally, I. E., Gerosa, G., Granier, C., Griffiths, P. T., Hossaini, R., Hu, L., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Lin, M. Y., Mertens, M., Morgenstern, O., Naja, M., Naik, V., Oltmans, S., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L. E., Saiz-Lopez, P., Saxena, P., Shin, Y. M., Shahid, I., Shallcross, D., Tilmes, S., Trickl, T., Wallington, T. J., Wang, T., Worden, H. M., and Zeng, G.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100, Elem. Sci. Anth., 8, 1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.2020.034</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Asman, W. A. H., Lawrence, M. G., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Crutzen, P. J., Cuijpers, J. W. M., and Nédélec, P.: Rarity of upper-tropospheric low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio events during MOZAIC flights, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1541–1549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1541-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-1541-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bak, J., Kim, J., Koo, H., Pan, L. L., Ryoo, M., Newman, P. A., Franchin, A., Liu, X., Abad, G. G., Lee, J., Jeon, W., and Kim, H.: An Integrated Analysis of Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Over the Western Pacific Using Satellite and Aircraft Measurements During the ACCLIP Summer Campaign 2022, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042771" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD042771</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Barnes, E. A. and Fiore, A. M.: Surface ozone variability and the jet position: Implications for projecting future air quality, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2839–2844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50411" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50411</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Boulanger, D., Thouret, V., and Petzold, A.: In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System (IAGOS) Data Portal , IAGOS [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/20" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/20</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Brauer, M., Freedman, G., Frostad, J., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Dentener, F., van Dingenen, R., Estep, K., Amini, H., Apte, J. S., Balakrishnan, K., Barregard, L., Broday, D., Feigin, V., Ghosh, S., Hopke, P. K., Knibbs, L. D., Kokubo, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, S., Morawska, L., Sangrador, J. L., Shaddick, G., Anderson, H. R., Vos, T., Forouzanfar, M. H., Burnett, R. T., and Cohen, A.: Ambient Air Pollution Exposure Estimation for the Global Burden of Disease 2013, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 79–88, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03709" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b03709</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Chandra, S., Ziemke, J. R., Min, W., and Read, W. G.: Effects of 1997–1998 El Niño on tropospheric ozone and water vapor, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3867–3870, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Petropavlovskikh, I., and Thouret, V.: Statistical regularization for trend detection: an integrated approach for detecting long-term trends from sparse tropospheric ozone profiles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9915–9938, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9915-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-9915-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Allaart, G., Ancellet, G., Clark, H., Godin-Beekmann, S., Leblanc, T., Van Malderen, R., Nédélec, P., Petropavlovskikh, I., Steinbrecht, W., Stübi, R., Tarasick, D. W., and Torres, C.: Impact of the COVID-19 economic downturn on tropospheric ozone trends: an uncertainty weighted data synthesis for quantifying regional anomalies above western North America and Europe, AGU Advances, 3, e2021AV000542, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000542" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021AV000542</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., Rodriguez, G., Iraci, L. T., Yates, E. L., Johnson, M. S., and West, J. J.: Diverging ozone trends above western North America: Boundary layer decreases versus free tropospheric increases, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD038090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD038090</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chang, K.-L., Schultz, M. G., Koren, G., and Selke, N.: Guidance note on best statistical practices for TOAR analyses, arXiv [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14236" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48550/arXiv.2304.14236</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Petropavlovskikh, I., Effertz, P., Morris, G., and McDonald, B. C.: Technical note: Challenges in detecting free tropospheric ozone trends in a sparsely sampled environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6197–6218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6197-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-6197-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Chang, K.-L., McDonald, B. C., Harkins, C., and Cooper, O. R.: Surface ozone trend variability across the United States and the impact of heat waves (1990–2023), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5101–5132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5101-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-5101-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y.-C.: A Tutorial on Kernel Density Estimation and Recent Advances, Biostatistics &amp; Epidemiology, 1, 161–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2017.1396742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/24709360.2017.1396742</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Cohen, Y., Petetin, H., Thouret, V., Marécal, V., Josse, B., Clark, H., Sauvage, B., Fontaine, A., Athier, G., Blot, R., Boulanger, D., Cousin, J.-M., and Nédélec, P.: Climatology and long-term evolution of ozone and carbon monoxide in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) at northern midlatitudes, as seen by IAGOS from 1995 to 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5415–5453, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5415-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5415-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Colombi, N. K., Jacob, D. J., Yang, L. H., Zhai, S., Shah, V., Grange, S. K., Yantosca, R. M., Kim, S., and Liao, H.: Why is ozone in South Korea and the Seoul metropolitan area so high and increasing?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4031–4044, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4031-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-4031-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, M. J., Martin, R. V., Livesey, N. J., Degenstein, D. A., and Walker, K. A.: Analysis of satellite remote sensing observations of low ozone events in the tropical upper troposphere and links with convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3761–3765, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50698" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50698</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, O. R., Forster, C., Parrish, D., Dunlea, E., Hübler, G., Fehsenfeld, F., Holloway, J., Oltmans, S., Johnson, B., Wimmers, A., and Horowitz, L.: On the life-cycle of a stratospheric intrusion and its dispersion into polluted warm conveyor belts, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23S09, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004006</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, O. R., Parrish, D. D., Stohl, A., Trainer, M., Nédélec, P., Thouret, V., Cammas, J. P., Oltmans, S. J., Johnson, B. J., Tarasick, D., Leblanc, T., McDermid, I. S., Jaffe, D., Gao, R., Stith, J., Ryerson, T., Aikin, K., Campos, T., Weinheimer, A., and Avery, M. A.: Increasing springtime ozone mixing ratios in the free troposphere over western North America, Nature, 463, 344–348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08708" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08708</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, O. R., Parrish, D. D., Ziemke, J., Balashov, N. V., Cupeiro, M., Galbally, I. E., Gilge, S., Horowitz, L., Jensen, N. R., Lamarque, J.-F., Naik, V., Oltmans, S. J., Schwab, J., Shindell, D. T., Thompson, A. M., Thouret, V., Wang, Y., and Zbinden, R. M.: Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone: An observation-based review, Elem. Sci. Anth., 2, 000029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.12952/journal.elementa.000029</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Schröder, S., Chang, K.-L., Gaudel, A., Carbajal Benítez, G., Cuevas, E., Fröhlich, M., Galbally, I. E., Kubistin, D., Lu, X., McClure-Begley, A., Molloy, S., Nédélec, P., O'Brien, J., Oltmans, S. J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Ries, L., Senik, I., Sjöberg, K., Solberg, S., Spain, T. G., Spangl, W., Steinbacher, M., Tarasick, D., Thouret, V., and Xu, X.: Multi-decadal surface ozone trends at globally distributed remote locations, Elem. Sci. Anth., 8, 23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.420</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, O. R., Ziemke, J. R., and Chang, K.-L.: Tropospheric Ozone [in “State of the Climate in 2023”], B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 105, S94–S96, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-24-0116.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-24-0116.1</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Cui, Y. Y., Ryoo, J.-M., Johnson, M. S., Chang, K.-L., Yates, E. L., Cooper, O. R., and Iraci, L. T.: Global source–receptor-relationship database for integrated tropospheric ozone observations from multiplatform datasets in western North America during 1994–2021, [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/ASDC/WNA-BackTraj" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/ASDC/WNA-BackTraj</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Cui, Y. Y., Ryoo, J.-M., Johnson, M. S., Chang, K.-L., Yates, E. L., Cooper, O. R., and Iraci, L. T.: Global source–receptor-relationship database for integrated tropospheric ozone observations from multiplatform datasets in western North America during 1994–2021, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 5903–5914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5903-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-17-5903-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Davies, W. E., Vaughan, G., and O'Connor, F. M.: Observation of near-zero ozone concentrations in the upper troposphere at mid-latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1173–1176, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Elshorbany, Y., Ziemke, J. R., Strode, S., Petetin, H., Miyazaki, K., De Smedt, I., Pickering, K., Seguel, R. J., Worden, H., Emmerichs, T., Taraborrelli, D., Cazorla, M., Fadnavis, S., Buchholz, R. R., Gaubert, B., Rojas, N. Y., Nogueira, T., Salameh, T., and Huang, M.: Tropospheric ozone precursors: global and regional distributions, trends, and variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12225–12257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12225-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-12225-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Eastham, S. D., Chossière, G. P., Speth, R. L., Jacob, D. J., and Barrett, S. R. H.: Global impacts of aviation on air quality evaluated at high resolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2687–2703, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2687-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-2687-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Environment and Climate Change Canada: Canadian ozonesonde network, World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre (WOUDC), <uri>https://hegiftom.meteo.be/datasets/ozonesondes</uri> (last access: 15 September 2026), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., West, J. J., Horowitz, L. W., Naik, V., and Schwarzkopf, M. D.: Characterizing the tropospheric ozone response to methane emission controls and the benefits to climate and air quality, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D08307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009162" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009162</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., Hancock, S. E., Lamarque, J.-F., Correa, G. P., Chang, K.-L., Ru, M., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Polvani, L. M., Sauvage, B., and Ziemke, J. R.: Understanding recent tropospheric ozone trends in the context of large internal variability: A new perspective from chemistry-climate model ensembles, Environ. Res. Climate, 1, 025008, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ac9cc2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/2752-5295/ac9cc2</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Fleming, Z. L., Doherty, R. M., von Schneidemesser, E., Malley, C. S., Cooper, O. R., Pinto, J. P., Colette, A., Xu, X., Simpson, D., Schultz, M. G., Lefohn, A. S., Hamad, S., Moolla, R., Solberg, S., and Feng, Z.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day ozone distribution and trends relevant to human health, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.273</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Froidevaux, L., Kinnison, D. E., Gaubert, B., Schwartz, M. J., Livesey, N. J., Read, W. G., Bardeen, C. G., Ziemke, J. R., and Fuller, R. A.: Tropical upper-tropospheric trends in ozone and carbon monoxide (2005–2020): observational and model results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 597–624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-597-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-597-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Gaudel, A., Cooper, O. R., Chang, K.-L., Bourgeois, I., Ziemke, J. R., Strode, S. A., Oman, L. D., Sellitto, P., Nédélec, P., Blot, R., Thouret, V., and Granier, C.: Aircraft observations since the 1990s reveal increases of tropospheric ozone at multiple locations across the Northern Hemisphere, Sci. Adv., 6, eaba8272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba8272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aba8272</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Gaudel, A., Bourgeois, I., Li, M., Chang, K.-L., Ziemke, J., Sauvage, B., Stauffer, R. M., Thompson, A. M., Kollonige, D. E., Smith, N., Hubert, D., Keppens, A., Cuesta, J., Heue, K.-P., Veefkind, P., Aikin, K., Peischl, J., Thompson, C. R., Ryerson, T. B., Frost, G. J., McDonald, B. C., and Cooper, O. R.: Tropical tropospheric ozone distribution and trends from in situ and satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9975–10000, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9975-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-9975-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A.,Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation> Grant, W. B., Browell, E. V., Butler, C. F., Fenn, M. A., Clayton, M. B., Hannan, J. R., Fuelberg, H. E., Blake, D. R., Blake, N. J., Gregory, G. L., Heikes, B. G., Sachse, G. W., Singh, H. B., Snow, J., and Talbot, R. W.: A case study of transport of tropical marine boundary layer and lower tropospheric air masses to the northern midlatitude upper troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3757–3769, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Gressent, A., Sauvage, B., Defer, E., Pätz, H. W., Thomas, K., Holle, R., Cammas, J.-P., Nédélec, P., Boulanger, D., Thouret, V., and Volz-Thomas, A.: Lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influence on large-scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plumes observed over the northern mid-latitudes, Tellus B, 66, 25544, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.25544" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v66.25544</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Gulev, S. K., Thorne, P. W., Ahn, J., Dentener, F. J., Domingues, C. M., Gerland, S., Gong, D., Kaufman, D. S., Nnamchi, H. C., Quaas, J., Rivera, J. A., Sathyendranath, S., Smith, S. L., Trewin, B.,  von Schuckmann, K., and Vose, R. S.: Changing State of the Climate System, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S.,  Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 287–422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.004</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>He, J., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.: Interpreting changes in global methane budget in a chemistry-climate model constrained with methane and isotopic observations, AGU Advances, 7, e2025AV001822. <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025AV001822" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025AV001822</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Iraci, L. and Yates, E.: Alpha Jet Atmospheric eXperiment, NASA Langley Atmospheric Science Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/ASDC/AJAX_O3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/ASDC/AJAX_O3</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., and Murti, P. P.: Effect of rising Asian emissions on surface ozone in the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2175–2178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900450" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL900450</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Jaffe, D. A., Cooper, O. R., Fiore, A. M., Henderson, B. H., Tonnesen, G. S., Russell, A. G., Henze, D. K., Langford, A. O., Lin, M., and Moore, T.: Scientific assessment of background ozone over the U. S.: Implications for air quality management, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.309" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.309</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Jeong, Y., Kim, S.-W., Kim, J., Shin, D., Kim, J., Park, J.-H., and An, S.-I.: Influence of ENSO on tropospheric ozone variability in East Asia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2023JD038604, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038604" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JD038604</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, M. S., Strawbridge, K., Knowland, K. E., Keller, C., and Travis, M.: Long-range transport of Siberian biomass burning emissions to North America during FIREX-AQ, Atmos. Environ., 252, 118241, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118241" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118241</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Kerr, G. H., Waugh, D. W., and Miller, S. M.: Jet stream-surface tracer relationships: Mechanism and sensitivity to source region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL090714, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090714" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL090714</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Kurokawa, J. and Ohara, T.: Long-term historical trends in air pollutant emissions in Asia: Regional Emission inventory in ASia (REAS) version 3, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12761–12793, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12761-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12761-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Lacis, A., Hansen, J., Lee, P., Mitchell, T., and Lebedeff, S.: Greenhouse effect of trace gases, 1970–1980, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 1035–1038, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i010p01035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL008i010p01035</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Lahoz, W. A., and Schneider, P.: Data assimilation: making sense of Earth Observation, Front. Environ. Sci., 2, 16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fenvs.2014.00016</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Li, M., Kurokawa, J., Zhang, Q., Woo, J.-H., Morikawa, T., Chatani, S., Lu, Z., Song, Y., Geng, G., Hu, H., Kim, J., Cooper, O. R., and McDonald, B. C.: MIXv2: a long-term mosaic emission inventory for Asia (2010–2017), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3925–3952, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3925-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-3925-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Li, P., Yang, Y., Wang, H., Li, S., Li, K., Wang, P., Li, B., and Liao, H.: Source attribution of near-surface ozone trends in the United States during 1995–2019, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5403–5417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5403-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-5403-2023</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Li, S., Yang, Y., Wang, H., Li, P., Li, K., Ren, L., Wang, P., Li, B., Mao, Y., and Liao, H.: Rapid increase in tropospheric ozone over Southeast Asia attributed to changes in precursor emission source regions and sectors, Atmos. Environ., 305, 119776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119776" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119776</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Horowitz, L. W., Oltmans, S. J., Fiore, A. M., and Fan, S.: Tropospheric ozone trends at Mauna Loa Observatory tied to decadal climate variability, Nat. Geosci., 7, 136–143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2066</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Oltmans, S. J., Tarasick, D., and Rieder, H. E.: Climate variability modulates western US ozone air quality in spring via deep stratospheric intrusions, Nat. Commun., 6, 7105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms8105</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Lin, M., Horowitz, L. W., Payton, R., Fiore, A. M., and Tonnesen, G.: US surface ozone trends and extremes from 1980 to 2014: quantifying the roles of rising Asian emissions, domestic controls, wildfires, and climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2943–2970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2943-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2943-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Strode, S. A., Liang, Q., Oman, L. D., Colarco, P. R., Fleming, E. L., Manyin, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Ziemke, J. R., Lamsal, L. N., and Li, C.: Change in tropospheric ozone in the recent decades and its contribution to global total ozone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD037170</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Cohen, J. B., He, Q., Tiwari, P., and Qin, K.: Accounting for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from biomass burning and urbanization doubles existing inventories over South, Southeast and East Asia, Commun. Earth Environ., 5, 255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01424-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-024-01424-5</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> Logan, J. A.: An analysis of ozonesonde data for the troposphere: Recommendations for testing 3-D models and development of a gridded climatology for tropospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16115–16149, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Luhar, A. K., Woodhouse, M. T., and Galbally, I. E.: A revised global ozone dry deposition estimate based on a new two-layer parameterisation for air–sea exchange and the multi-year MACC composition reanalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4329–4348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4329-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-4329-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Malashock, D. A., DeLang, M. N., Jacob, S. B., Serre, M. L., West, J. J., Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., and Anenberg, S. C.: Estimates of ozone concentrations and attributable mortality in urban, peri-urban and rural areas worldwide in 2019, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 054023, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac66f3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ac66f3</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>McDuffie, E. E., Smith, S. J., O'Rourke, P., Tibrewal, K., Venkataraman, C., Marais, E. A., Zheng, B., Crippa, M., Brauer, M., and Martin, R. V.: A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuel-specific sources (1970–2017): an application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3413–3442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3413-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-12-3413-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Mills, G., Pleijel, H., Malley, C. S., Sinha, B., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Neufeld, H. S., Simpson, D., Sharps, K., Feng, Z., Gerosa, G., Harmens, H., Kobayashi, K., Saxena, P., Paoletti, E., Sinha, V., and Xu, X.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.302</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Miyazaki, K., Bowman, K., Sekiya, T., Eskes, H., Boersma, F., Worden, H., Livesey, N., Payne, V. H., Sudo, K., Kanaya, Y., Takigawa, M., and Ogochi, K.: Chemical Reanalysis Products, NASA Atmospheric Science Data Center (ASDC) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25966/9qgv-fe81" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25966/9qgv-fe81</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation> Miyazaki, K., Sekiya, T., Fu, D., Bowman, K., Kulawik, S., Sudo, K., Walker, T., Kanaya, Y., Takigawa, M., Ogochi, K., Eskes, H., Boersma, K. F., Thompson, A. M., Gaubert, B., Barre, J., and Emmons, L. K.: Balance of Emission and Dynamical Controls on Ozone During the Korea-United States Air Quality Campaign From Multiconstituent Satellite Data Assimilation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 387–413, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Miyazaki, K., Bowman, K., Sekiya, T., Eskes, H., Boersma, F., Worden, H., Livesey, N., Payne, V. H., Sudo, K., Kanaya, Y., Takigawa, M., and Ogochi, K.: Updated tropospheric chemistry reanalysis and emission estimates, TCR-2, for 2005–2018, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2223–2259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2223-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-12-2223-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Table Mountain atmospheric lidar data, Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC), <uri>https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/missions/ndacc/</uri> (last access: 15 September 2026), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Nisbet, E. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Manning, M. R., Lowry, D., Fisher, R. E., France, J. L., Michel, S. E., Miller, J. B., White, J. W. C., Vaughn, B., Bousquet, P., Pyle, J. A., Warwick, N. J., Cain, M., Brownlow, R., Zazzeri, G., Lanoisellé, M., Manning, A. C., Gloor, E., Worthy, D. E. J., Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., Wolff, E. W., and Ganesan, A. L.: Rising atmospheric methane: 2007–2014 growth and isotopic shift, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 1356–1370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005406" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GB005406</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Nisbet, E. G., Manning, M. R., Dlugokencky, E. J., Fisher, R. E., Lowry, D., Michel, S. E., Myhre, C. L., Platt, S. M.,  Allen, G., Bousquet, P.,  Brownlow, R., Cain, M., France, J. L., Hermansen, O., Hossaini, R., Jones, A. E.,  Levin, I.,  Manning, A. C., Myhre, G., Pyle, J. A., Vaughn, B. H.,  Warwick, N. J., and White, J. W. C.: Very strong atmospheric methane growth in the 4 years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 33, 318–342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GB006009</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (GML): Homogenized ozonesonde data archive, <uri>https://gml.noaa.gov/ozwv/ozsondes/</uri> (last access: 15 September 2026), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Oman, L. D., Ziemke, J. R., Douglass, A. R., Waugh, D. W., Lang, C., Rodriguez, J. M., and Nielsen, J. E.: The response of tropical tropospheric ozone to ENSO, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L13802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047865" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047865</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Ziemke, J. R., Rodriguez, J. M., Waugh, D. W., and Nielsen, J. E.: The ozone response to ENSO in Aura satellite measurements and a chemistry-climate simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 965–976, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018546" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018546</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Pisso, I., Sollum, E., Grythe, H., Kristiansen, N. I., Cassiani, M., Eckhardt, S., Arnold, D., Morton, D., Thompson, R. L., Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Evangeliou, N., Sodemann, H., Haimberger, L., Henne, S., Brunner, D., Burkhart, J. F., Fouilloux, A., Brioude, J., Philipp, A., Seibert, P., and Stohl, A.: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 10.4, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4955–4997, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Prime, N., Smith, S. J., Ahsan, H., Hoesly, R. M., Mott, A., O'Rourke, P. R., McDuffie, E. E., Crippa, M., Klimont, Z., McDonald, B., Wang, S., Nicholson, M. B., and  Feng, L.: CEDS Version 2021-04-21 Aircraft Emissions Fix, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7846185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7846185</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Prinn, R. G.: Toward an improved global network for determination of tropospheric ozone climatology and trends, J. Atmos. Chem., 6, 281–298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053861" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00053861</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Putero, D., Cristofanelli, P., Chang, K.-L., Dufour, G., Beachley, G., Couret, C., Effertz, P., Jaffe, D. A., Kubistin, D., Lynch, J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Puchalski, M., Sharac, T., Sive, B. C., Steinbacher, M., Torres, C., and Cooper, O. R.: Fingerprints of the COVID-19 economic downturn and recovery on ozone anomalies at high-elevation sites in North America and western Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15693–15709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15693-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-15693-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation> Ramaswamy, V., Chanin, M.-L., Angell, J., Barnett, J., Gaffen, D., Gelman, M., Keckhut, P., Koshelkov, Y., Labitzke, K., Lin, J.-J. R., O'Neill, A., Nash, J., Randel, W., Rood, R., Shine, K., Shiotani, M., and Swinbank, R.: Stratospheric temperature trends: Observations and model simulations, Rev. Geophys., 39, 71–122, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Rotman, D. A., Tannahill, J. R., Kinnison, D. E., Connell, P. S., Bergmann, D., Proctor, D., Rodriguez, J. M., Lin, S. J., Rood, R. B., Prather, M. J., Rasch, P. J., Considine, D. B., Ramaroson, R., and Kawa, S. R.: Global Modeling Initiative assessment model: Model description, integration, and testing of the transport shell, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 1669–1691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900463</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Ryoo, J.-M., Johnson, M. S., Iraci, L. T., Yates, E. L., and Gore, W.: Investigating sources of ozone over California using AJAX airborne measurements and models: assessing the long-range transport, Atmos. Environ., 155, 53–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.008</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Samphutthanont, R., Crawford, J. H., Pawarmart, I., ]Wisthaler, A., Swift, S. J. Piel, F., Wojnowski, W., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Yun, S.,Symonds, G., Day,D. A., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G. S., Crounse, J. D., Ball, K.,Wennberg,P. O., Lee, M., Gil, J., and Choochuay, C.: A multi-platform validation of biomass burning emissions: Integrating ground, airborne, and satellite data to quantify regional haze health impacts in Thailand, Environ. Pollut., 405, 128576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128576" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128576</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Emmons, L., Lamarque, J.-F., Tilmes, S., Wespes, C., Thouret, V., and Schultz, M.: Impact of sampling frequency in the analysis of tropospheric ozone observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6757–6773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6757-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6757-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation> Smith, S. J., Zhou, Y., Kyle, P., Wang, H., and Yu, H.: A Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) for Historical Emissions, in: 2015 International Emission Inventory Conference: Air Quality Challenges: Tackling the Changing Face of Emissions, 13–16 April 2015, San Diego, California, US EPA, Washington, D.C., PNNL-SA-109670, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Strode, S. A., Rodriguez, J. M., Logan, J. A., Cooper, O. R., Witte, J. C., Lamsal, L. N., Damon, M., Van Aartsen, B., Steenrod, S. D., and Strahan, S. E.: Trends and variability in surface ozone over the United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9020–9042, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022784" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022784</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Strode, S. A., Worden, H. M., Damon, M., Douglass, A. R., Duncan, B. N., Emmons, L. K., Lamarque, J.-F., Manyin, M., Oman, L. D., Rodriguez, J. M., Strahan, S. E., and Tilmes, S.: Interpreting space-based trends in carbon monoxide with multiple models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7285–7294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7285-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7285-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. D., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 817–922, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.008</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Tarasick, D., Galbally, I. E., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Ancellet, G., Leblanc, T., Wallington, T. J., Ziemke, J., Liu, X., Steinbacher, M., Staehelin, J., Vigouroux, C., Hannigan, J. W., García, O., Foret, G., Zanis, P., Weatherhead, E., Petropavlovskikh, I., Worden, H., Osman, M., Liu, J., Chang, K.-L., Gaudel, A., Lin, M., Granados-Muñoz, M., Thompson, A. M., Oltmans, S. J., Cuesta, J., Dufour, G., Thouret, V., Hassler, B., Trickl, T., and Neu, J. L.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Tropospheric ozone from 1877 to 2016, observed levels, trends and uncertainties, Elem. Sci. Anth., 7, 39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.376" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.376</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, A. M., Stauffer, R. M., Boyle, T. P., Kollonige, D. E., Miyazaki, K., Tzortziou, M., Herman, J. R., Abuhassan, N., Jordan, C. E., and Lamb, B. T.: Comparison of Near-Surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pollution With Pandora Total Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> During the Korea-United States Ocean Color (KORUS OC) Campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 13560–13575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD030765</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Thorp, T., Arnold, S. R., Pope, R. J., Spracklen, D. V., Conibear, L., Knote, C., Arshinov, M., Belan, B., Asmi, E., Laurila, T., Skorokhod, A. I., Nieminen, T., and Petäjä, T.: Late-spring and summertime tropospheric ozone and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in western Siberia and the Russian Arctic: regional model evaluation and sensitivities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4677–4697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4677-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-4677-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Tong, D., Pan, L., Chen, W., Lamsal, L., Lee, P., Tang, Y., Kim, H., Kondragunta, S., and Stajner, I.: Impact of the 2008 Global Recession on air quality over the United States: Implications for surface ozone levels from changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9280–9288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069885" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069885</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation> U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants, EPA/600/R-20/012,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation> U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Policy Assessment for the Reconsideration of the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards, External Review Draft Version 2, EPA-452/P-23-002, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Van Malderen, R., Zang, Z., Chang, K.-L., Björklund, R., Cooper, O. R., Liu, J., Maillard Barras, E., Vigouroux, C., Petropavlovskikh, I., Leblanc, T., Thouret, V., Wolff, P., Effertz, P., Gaudel, A., Tarasick, D. W., Smit, H. G. J., Thompson, A. M., Stauffer, R. M., Kollonige, D. E., Poyraz, D., Ancellet, G., De Backer, M.-R., Frey, M. M., Hannigan, J. W., Hernandez, J. L., Johnson, B. J., Jones, N., Kivi, R., Mahieu, E., Morino, I., McConville, G., Müller, K., Murata, I., Notholt, J., Piters, A., Prignon, M., Querel, R., Rizi, V., Smale, D., Steinbrecht, W., Strong, K., and Sussmann, R.: Ground-based tropospheric ozone measurements: regional tropospheric ozone column trends from the TOAR-II/HEGIFTOM homogenized datasets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 9905–9935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9905-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-9905-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Verstraeten, W. W., Neu, J. L., Williams, J. E., Bowman, K. W., Worden, J. R., and Boersma, K. F.: Rapid increases in tropospheric ozone production and export from China, Nat. Geosci. 8: 690–695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2493" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2493</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Lu, X., Jacob, D. J., Cooper, O. R., Chang, K.-L., Li, K., Gao, M., Liu, Y., Sheng, B., Wu, K., Wu, T., Zhang, J., Sauvage, B., Nédélec, P., Blot, R., and Fan, S.: Global tropospheric ozone trends, attributions, and radiative impacts in 1995–2017: an integrated analysis using aircraft (IAGOS) observations, ozonesonde, and multi-decadal chemical model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13753–13782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022</ext-link>, 2022a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Dai, J., Lam, K. S., Nan Poon, C., and Brasseur, G. P.: Twenty-five years of lower tropospheric ozone observations in tropical East Asia: The influence of emissions and weather patterns, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 11463–11470, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084459" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL084459</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Fu, T.-M., Zhang, L., Lu, X., Liu, X., Amnuaylojaroen, T., Latif, M. T., Ma, Y., Zhang, L., Feng, X., Zhu, L., Shen, H., and Yang, X: Rapidly Changing Emissions Drove Substantial Surface and Tropospheric Ozone Increases Over Southeast Asia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100223" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022GL100223</ext-link>, 2022b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. L., and Lazar, N. A.: Moving to a world beyond <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Am. Stat., 73, 1–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>WHO: WHO global air quality guidelines. Particulate matter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Xue, L., Ding, A., Cooper, O., Huang, X., Wang, W., Zhou, D., Wu, Z., McClure-Begley, A., Petropavlovskikh, I., Andreae, M. O., and Fu, C.: ENSO and Southeast Asian biomass burning modulate subtropical trans-Pacific ozone transport, Natl. Sci. Rev., 8, nwaa132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nwaa132</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Yates, E. L., Iraci, L. T., Kulawik, S. S., Ryoo, J.-M., Marrero, J. E., Parworth, C. L., St. Clair, J. M., Hanisco, T. F., Bui, T. P. V., Chang, C. S., and Dean-Day, J. M.: An extensive database of airborne trace gas and meteorological observations from the Alpha Jet Atmospheric eXperiment (AJAX), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2375–2389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2375-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-15-2375-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Jacob, D. J., Boersma, K. F., Jaffe, D. A., Olson, J. R., Bowman, K. W., Worden, J. R., Thompson, A. M., Avery, M. A., Cohen, R. C., Dibb, J. E., Flock, F. M., Fuelberg, H. E., Huey, L. G., McMillan, W. W., Singh, H. B., and Weinheimer, A. J.: Transpacific transport of ozone pollution and the effect of recent Asian emission increases on air quality in North America: an integrated analysis using satellite, aircraft, ozonesonde, and surface observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6117–6136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6117-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6117-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Thompson, A. M., Nédélec, P., Ogino, S.-Y., and West, J. J.: Tropospheric ozone change from 1980 to 2010 dominated by equatorward redistribution of emissions, Nat. Geosci., 9, 875–879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2827</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Zheng, B.: On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13011–13022, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Douglass, A. R., Oman, L. D., Strahan, S. E., and Duncan, B. N.: Tropospheric ozone variability in the tropics from ENSO to MJO and shorter timescales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8037–8049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8037-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8037-2015</ext-link>, 2015. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Strode, S. A., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., McPeters, R. D., Bhartia, P. K., Froidevaux, L., Labow, G. J., Witte, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Haffner, D. P., Kramarova, N. A., Frith, S. M., Huang, L.-K., Jaross, G. R., Seftor, C. J., Deland, M. T., and Taylor, S. L.: Trends in global tropospheric ozone inferred from a composite record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS satellite measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3257–3269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Origin of low ozone above western North America: an investigation of sources and trends</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ansari, T., Nalam, A., Lupaşcu, A., Hinz, C., Grasse, S., and Butler, T.:
Explaining trends and changing seasonal cycles of surface ozone in North America and Europe over the 2000–2018 period: a global modelling study with NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and VOC tagging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 16833–16876, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16833-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16833-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Deushi, M., Finco, A., Frost, G. J., Galbally, I. E., Gerosa, G., Granier, C., Griffiths, P. T., Hossaini, R., Hu, L., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Lin, M. Y., Mertens, M., Morgenstern, O., Naja, M., Naik, V., Oltmans, S., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L. E., Saiz-Lopez, P., Saxena, P., Shin, Y. M., Shahid, I., Shallcross, D., Tilmes, S., Trickl, T., Wallington, T. J., Wang, T., Worden, H. M., and Zeng, G.:
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100, Elem. Sci. Anth., 8, 1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Asman, W. A. H., Lawrence, M. G., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Crutzen, P. J., Cuijpers, J. W. M., and Nédélec, P.:
Rarity of upper-tropospheric low O<sub>3</sub> mixing ratio events during MOZAIC flights, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1541–1549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1541-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1541-2003</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bak, J., Kim, J., Koo, H., Pan, L. L., Ryoo, M., Newman, P. A., Franchin, A., Liu, X., Abad, G. G., Lee, J., Jeon, W., and Kim, H.:
An Integrated Analysis of Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Over the Western Pacific Using Satellite and Aircraft Measurements During the ACCLIP Summer Campaign 2022, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042771" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042771</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barnes, E. A. and Fiore, A. M.:
Surface ozone variability and the jet position: Implications for projecting future air quality, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2839–2844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50411" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50411</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boulanger, D., Thouret, V., and Petzold, A.:
In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System (IAGOS) Data Portal , IAGOS [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/20" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/20</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brauer, M., Freedman, G., Frostad, J., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Dentener, F., van Dingenen, R., Estep, K., Amini, H., Apte, J. S., Balakrishnan, K., Barregard, L., Broday, D., Feigin, V., Ghosh, S., Hopke, P. K., Knibbs, L. D., Kokubo, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, S., Morawska, L., Sangrador, J. L., Shaddick, G., Anderson, H. R., Vos, T., Forouzanfar, M. H., Burnett, R. T., and Cohen, A.:
Ambient Air Pollution Exposure Estimation for the Global Burden of Disease 2013, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 79–88, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03709" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03709</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chandra, S., Ziemke, J. R., Min, W., and Read, W. G.:
Effects of 1997–1998 El Niño on tropospheric ozone and water vapor, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3867–3870, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Petropavlovskikh, I., and Thouret, V.:
Statistical regularization for trend detection: an integrated approach for detecting long-term trends from sparse tropospheric ozone profiles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9915–9938, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9915-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9915-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Allaart, G., Ancellet, G., Clark, H., Godin-Beekmann, S., Leblanc, T., Van Malderen, R., Nédélec, P., Petropavlovskikh, I., Steinbrecht, W., Stübi, R., Tarasick, D. W., and Torres, C.:
Impact of the COVID-19 economic downturn on tropospheric ozone trends: an uncertainty weighted data synthesis for quantifying regional anomalies above western North America and Europe, AGU Advances, 3, e2021AV000542, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000542" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000542</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., Rodriguez, G., Iraci, L. T., Yates, E. L., Johnson, M. S., and West, J. J.:
Diverging ozone trends above western North America: Boundary layer decreases versus free tropospheric increases, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD038090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038090" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038090</a>, 2023a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, K.-L., Schultz, M. G., Koren, G., and Selke, N.:
Guidance note on best statistical practices for TOAR analyses, arXiv [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14236" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.14236</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Petropavlovskikh, I., Effertz, P., Morris, G., and McDonald, B. C.:
Technical note: Challenges in detecting free tropospheric ozone trends in a sparsely sampled environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6197–6218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6197-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6197-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, K.-L., McDonald, B. C., Harkins, C., and Cooper, O. R.:
Surface ozone trend variability across the United States and the impact of heat waves (1990–2023), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5101–5132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5101-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5101-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Y.-C.:
A Tutorial on Kernel Density Estimation and Recent Advances, Biostatistics &amp; Epidemiology, 1, 161–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2017.1396742" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2017.1396742</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cohen, Y., Petetin, H., Thouret, V., Marécal, V., Josse, B., Clark, H., Sauvage, B., Fontaine, A., Athier, G., Blot, R., Boulanger, D., Cousin, J.-M., and Nédélec, P.:
Climatology and long-term evolution of ozone and carbon monoxide in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) at northern midlatitudes, as seen by IAGOS from 1995 to 2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5415–5453, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5415-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5415-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Colombi, N. K., Jacob, D. J., Yang, L. H., Zhai, S., Shah, V., Grange, S. K., Yantosca, R. M., Kim, S., and Liao, H.:
Why is ozone in South Korea and the Seoul metropolitan area so high and increasing?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4031–4044, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4031-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4031-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cooper, M. J., Martin, R. V., Livesey, N. J., Degenstein, D. A., and Walker, K. A.:
Analysis of satellite remote sensing observations of low ozone events in the tropical upper troposphere and links with convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3761–3765, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50698" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50698</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cooper, O. R., Forster, C., Parrish, D., Dunlea, E., Hübler, G., Fehsenfeld, F., Holloway, J., Oltmans, S., Johnson, B., Wimmers, A., and Horowitz, L.:
On the life-cycle of a stratospheric intrusion and its dispersion into polluted warm conveyor belts, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23S09, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004006</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cooper, O. R., Parrish, D. D., Stohl, A., Trainer, M., Nédélec, P., Thouret, V., Cammas, J. P., Oltmans, S. J., Johnson, B. J., Tarasick, D., Leblanc, T., McDermid, I. S., Jaffe, D., Gao, R., Stith, J., Ryerson, T., Aikin, K., Campos, T., Weinheimer, A., and Avery, M. A.:
Increasing springtime ozone mixing ratios in the free troposphere over western North America, Nature, 463, 344–348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08708" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08708</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cooper, O. R., Parrish, D. D., Ziemke, J., Balashov, N. V., Cupeiro, M., Galbally, I. E., Gilge, S., Horowitz, L., Jensen, N. R., Lamarque, J.-F., Naik, V., Oltmans, S. J., Schwab, J., Shindell, D. T., Thompson, A. M., Thouret, V., Wang, Y., and Zbinden, R. M.:
Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone: An observation-based review, Elem. Sci. Anth., 2, 000029, <a href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000029</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Schröder, S., Chang, K.-L., Gaudel, A., Carbajal Benítez, G., Cuevas, E., Fröhlich, M., Galbally, I. E., Kubistin, D., Lu, X., McClure-Begley, A., Molloy, S., Nédélec, P., O'Brien, J., Oltmans, S. J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Ries, L., Senik, I., Sjöberg, K., Solberg, S., Spain, T. G., Spangl, W., Steinbacher, M., Tarasick, D., Thouret, V., and Xu, X.:
Multi-decadal surface ozone trends at globally distributed remote locations, Elem. Sci. Anth., 8, 23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.420" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.420</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cooper, O. R., Ziemke, J. R., and Chang, K.-L.:
Tropospheric Ozone [in “State of the Climate in 2023”], B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 105, S94–S96, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-24-0116.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-24-0116.1</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cui, Y. Y., Ryoo, J.-M., Johnson, M. S., Chang, K.-L., Yates, E. L., Cooper, O. R., and Iraci, L. T.: Global source–receptor-relationship database for integrated tropospheric ozone observations from multiplatform datasets in western North America during 1994–2021, [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/ASDC/WNA-BackTraj" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/ASDC/WNA-BackTraj</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cui, Y. Y., Ryoo, J.-M., Johnson, M. S., Chang, K.-L., Yates, E. L., Cooper, O. R., and Iraci, L. T.:
Global source–receptor-relationship database for integrated tropospheric ozone observations from multiplatform datasets in western North America during 1994–2021, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 5903–5914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5903-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5903-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davies, W. E., Vaughan, G., and O'Connor, F. M.:
Observation of near-zero ozone concentrations in the upper troposphere at mid-latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1173–1176, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elshorbany, Y., Ziemke, J. R., Strode, S., Petetin, H., Miyazaki, K., De Smedt, I., Pickering, K., Seguel, R. J., Worden, H., Emmerichs, T., Taraborrelli, D., Cazorla, M., Fadnavis, S., Buchholz, R. R., Gaubert, B., Rojas, N. Y., Nogueira, T., Salameh, T., and Huang, M.:
Tropospheric ozone precursors: global and regional distributions, trends, and variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12225–12257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12225-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12225-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eastham, S. D., Chossière, G. P., Speth, R. L., Jacob, D. J., and Barrett, S. R. H.:
Global impacts of aviation on air quality evaluated at high resolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2687–2703, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2687-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2687-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Environment and Climate Change Canada:
Canadian ozonesonde network, World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre (WOUDC), <a href="https://hegiftom.meteo.be/datasets/ozonesondes" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 September 2026), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fiore, A. M., West, J. J., Horowitz, L. W., Naik, V., and Schwarzkopf, M. D.:
Characterizing the tropospheric ozone response to methane emission controls and the benefits to climate and air quality, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D08307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009162" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009162</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fiore, A. M., Hancock, S. E., Lamarque, J.-F., Correa, G. P., Chang, K.-L., Ru, M., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Polvani, L. M., Sauvage, B., and Ziemke, J. R.:
Understanding recent tropospheric ozone trends in the context of large internal variability: A new perspective from chemistry-climate model ensembles, Environ. Res. Climate, 1, 025008, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ac9cc2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ac9cc2</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fleming, Z. L., Doherty, R. M., von Schneidemesser, E., Malley, C. S., Cooper, O. R., Pinto, J. P., Colette, A., Xu, X., Simpson, D., Schultz, M. G., Lefohn, A. S., Hamad, S., Moolla, R., Solberg, S., and Feng, Z.:
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day ozone distribution and trends relevant to human health, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.273" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.273</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Froidevaux, L., Kinnison, D. E., Gaubert, B., Schwartz, M. J., Livesey, N. J., Read, W. G., Bardeen, C. G., Ziemke, J. R., and Fuller, R. A.:
Tropical upper-tropospheric trends in ozone and carbon monoxide (2005–2020): observational and model results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 597–624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-597-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-597-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gaudel, A., Cooper, O. R., Chang, K.-L., Bourgeois, I., Ziemke, J. R., Strode, S. A., Oman, L. D., Sellitto, P., Nédélec, P., Blot, R., Thouret, V., and Granier, C.:
Aircraft observations since the 1990s reveal increases of tropospheric ozone at multiple locations across the Northern Hemisphere, Sci. Adv., 6, eaba8272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba8272" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba8272</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gaudel, A., Bourgeois, I., Li, M., Chang, K.-L., Ziemke, J., Sauvage, B., Stauffer, R. M., Thompson, A. M., Kollonige, D. E., Smith, N., Hubert, D., Keppens, A., Cuesta, J., Heue, K.-P., Veefkind, P., Aikin, K., Peischl, J., Thompson, C. R., Ryerson, T. B., Frost, G. J., McDonald, B. C., and Cooper, O. R.:
Tropical tropospheric ozone distribution and trends from in situ and satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9975–10000, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9975-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9975-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A.,Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.:
The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grant, W. B., Browell, E. V., Butler, C. F., Fenn, M. A., Clayton, M. B., Hannan, J. R., Fuelberg, H. E., Blake, D. R., Blake, N. J., Gregory, G. L., Heikes, B. G., Sachse, G. W., Singh, H. B., Snow, J., and Talbot, R. W.:
A case study of transport of tropical marine boundary layer and lower tropospheric air masses to the northern midlatitude upper troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3757–3769, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gressent, A., Sauvage, B., Defer, E., Pätz, H. W., Thomas, K., Holle, R., Cammas, J.-P., Nédélec, P., Boulanger, D., Thouret, V., and Volz-Thomas, A.:
Lightning NO<sub>x</sub> influence on large-scale NO<sub>y</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> plumes observed over the northern mid-latitudes, Tellus B, 66, 25544, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.25544" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.25544</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gulev, S. K., Thorne, P. W., Ahn, J., Dentener, F. J., Domingues, C. M., Gerland, S., Gong, D., Kaufman, D. S., Nnamchi, H. C., Quaas, J., Rivera, J. A., Sathyendranath, S., Smith, S. L., Trewin, B.,  von Schuckmann, K., and Vose, R. S.: Changing State of the Climate System, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S.,  Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 287–422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.004</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, J., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.:
Interpreting changes in global methane budget in a chemistry-climate model constrained with methane and isotopic observations, AGU Advances, 7, e2025AV001822. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025AV001822" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025AV001822</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.:
The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.:
Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Iraci, L. and Yates, E.: Alpha Jet Atmospheric eXperiment, NASA Langley Atmospheric Science Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/ASDC/AJAX_O3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/ASDC/AJAX_O3</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., and Murti, P. P.:
Effect of rising Asian emissions on surface ozone in the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2175–2178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900450" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900450</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jaffe, D. A., Cooper, O. R., Fiore, A. M., Henderson, B. H., Tonnesen, G. S., Russell, A. G., Henze, D. K., Langford, A. O., Lin, M., and Moore, T.:
Scientific assessment of background ozone over the U. S.:
Implications for air quality management, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.309" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.309</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jeong, Y., Kim, S.-W., Kim, J., Shin, D., Kim, J., Park, J.-H., and An, S.-I.:
Influence of ENSO on tropospheric ozone variability in East Asia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2023JD038604, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038604" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038604</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Johnson, M. S., Strawbridge, K., Knowland, K. E., Keller, C., and Travis, M.:
Long-range transport of Siberian biomass burning emissions to North America during FIREX-AQ, Atmos. Environ., 252, 118241, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118241" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118241</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kerr, G. H., Waugh, D. W., and Miller, S. M.:
Jet stream-surface tracer relationships: Mechanism and sensitivity to source region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL090714, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090714" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090714</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kurokawa, J. and Ohara, T.:
Long-term historical trends in air pollutant emissions in Asia: Regional Emission inventory in ASia (REAS) version 3, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12761–12793, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12761-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12761-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lacis, A., Hansen, J., Lee, P., Mitchell, T., and Lebedeff, S.:
Greenhouse effect of trace gases, 1970–1980, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 1035–1038, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i010p01035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i010p01035</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lahoz, W. A., and Schneider, P.:
Data assimilation: making sense of Earth Observation, Front. Environ. Sci., 2, 16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00016</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, M., Kurokawa, J., Zhang, Q., Woo, J.-H., Morikawa, T., Chatani, S., Lu, Z., Song, Y., Geng, G., Hu, H., Kim, J., Cooper, O. R., and McDonald, B. C.:
MIXv2: a long-term mosaic emission inventory for Asia (2010–2017), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3925–3952, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3925-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3925-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, P., Yang, Y., Wang, H., Li, S., Li, K., Wang, P., Li, B., and Liao, H.:
Source attribution of near-surface ozone trends in the United States during 1995–2019, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5403–5417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5403-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5403-2023</a>, 2023a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, S., Yang, Y., Wang, H., Li, P., Li, K., Ren, L., Wang, P., Li, B., Mao, Y., and Liao, H.:
Rapid increase in tropospheric ozone over Southeast Asia attributed to changes in precursor emission source regions and sectors, Atmos. Environ., 305, 119776, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119776" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119776</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, M., Horowitz, L. W., Oltmans, S. J., Fiore, A. M., and Fan, S.:
Tropospheric ozone trends at Mauna Loa Observatory tied to decadal climate variability, Nat. Geosci., 7, 136–143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2066</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Oltmans, S. J., Tarasick, D., and Rieder, H. E.:
Climate variability modulates western US ozone air quality in spring via deep stratospheric intrusions, Nat. Commun., 6, 7105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, M., Horowitz, L. W., Payton, R., Fiore, A. M., and Tonnesen, G.:
US surface ozone trends and extremes from 1980 to 2014: quantifying the roles of rising Asian emissions, domestic controls, wildfires, and climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2943–2970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2943-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2943-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, J., Strode, S. A., Liang, Q., Oman, L. D., Colarco, P. R., Fleming, E. L., Manyin, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Ziemke, J. R., Lamsal, L. N., and Li, C.:
Change in tropospheric ozone in the recent decades and its contribution to global total ozone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037170</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, J., Cohen, J. B., He, Q., Tiwari, P., and Qin, K.:
Accounting for NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from biomass burning and urbanization doubles existing inventories over South, Southeast and East Asia, Commun. Earth Environ., 5, 255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01424-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01424-5</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Logan, J. A.:
An analysis of ozonesonde data for the troposphere: Recommendations for testing 3-D models and development of a gridded climatology for tropospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16115–16149, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luhar, A. K., Woodhouse, M. T., and Galbally, I. E.:
A revised global ozone dry deposition estimate based on a new two-layer parameterisation for air–sea exchange and the multi-year MACC composition reanalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4329–4348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4329-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4329-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Malashock, D. A., DeLang, M. N., Jacob, S. B., Serre, M. L., West, J. J., Chang, K.-L., Cooper, O. R., and Anenberg, S. C.:
Estimates of ozone concentrations and attributable mortality in urban, peri-urban and rural areas worldwide in 2019, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 054023, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac66f3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac66f3</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
McDuffie, E. E., Smith, S. J., O'Rourke, P., Tibrewal, K., Venkataraman, C., Marais, E. A., Zheng, B., Crippa, M., Brauer, M., and Martin, R. V.:
A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuel-specific sources (1970–2017): an application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3413–3442, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3413-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3413-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mills, G., Pleijel, H., Malley, C. S., Sinha, B., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Neufeld, H. S., Simpson, D., Sharps, K., Feng, Z., Gerosa, G., Harmens, H., Kobayashi, K., Saxena, P., Paoletti, E., Sinha, V., and Xu, X.:
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miyazaki, K., Bowman, K., Sekiya, T., Eskes, H., Boersma, F., Worden, H., Livesey, N., Payne, V. H., Sudo, K., Kanaya, Y., Takigawa, M., and Ogochi, K.:
Chemical Reanalysis Products, NASA Atmospheric Science Data Center (ASDC) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25966/9qgv-fe81" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25966/9qgv-fe81</a>, 2019a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miyazaki, K., Sekiya, T., Fu, D., Bowman, K., Kulawik, S., Sudo, K., Walker, T., Kanaya, Y., Takigawa, M., Ogochi, K., Eskes, H., Boersma, K. F., Thompson, A. M., Gaubert, B., Barre, J., and Emmons, L. K.:
Balance of Emission and Dynamical Controls on Ozone During the Korea-United States Air Quality Campaign From Multiconstituent Satellite Data Assimilation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 387–413, 2019b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miyazaki, K., Bowman, K., Sekiya, T., Eskes, H., Boersma, F., Worden, H., Livesey, N., Payne, V. H., Sudo, K., Kanaya, Y., Takigawa, M., and Ogochi, K.:
Updated tropospheric chemistry reanalysis and emission estimates, TCR-2, for 2005–2018, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2223–2259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2223-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2223-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory:
Table Mountain atmospheric lidar data, Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC), <a href="https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/missions/ndacc/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 September 2026), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nisbet, E. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Manning, M. R., Lowry, D., Fisher, R. E., France, J. L., Michel, S. E., Miller, J. B., White, J. W. C., Vaughn, B., Bousquet, P., Pyle, J. A., Warwick, N. J., Cain, M., Brownlow, R., Zazzeri, G., Lanoisellé, M., Manning, A. C., Gloor, E., Worthy, D. E. J., Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., Wolff, E. W., and Ganesan, A. L.:
Rising atmospheric methane: 2007–2014 growth and isotopic shift, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 1356–1370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005406" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005406</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nisbet, E. G., Manning, M. R., Dlugokencky, E. J., Fisher, R. E., Lowry, D., Michel, S. E., Myhre, C. L., Platt, S. M.,  Allen, G., Bousquet, P.,  Brownlow, R., Cain, M., France, J. L., Hermansen, O., Hossaini, R., Jones, A. E.,  Levin, I.,  Manning, A. C., Myhre, G., Pyle, J. A., Vaughn, B. H.,  Warwick, N. J., and White, J. W. C.:
Very strong atmospheric methane growth in the 4 years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 33, 318–342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (GML):
Homogenized ozonesonde data archive, <a href="https://gml.noaa.gov/ozwv/ozsondes/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 September 2026), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oman, L. D., Ziemke, J. R., Douglass, A. R., Waugh, D. W., Lang, C., Rodriguez, J. M., and Nielsen, J. E.:
The response of tropical tropospheric ozone to ENSO, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L13802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047865" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047865</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Ziemke, J. R., Rodriguez, J. M., Waugh, D. W., and Nielsen, J. E.:
The ozone response to ENSO in Aura satellite measurements and a chemistry-climate simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 965–976, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018546" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018546</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pisso, I., Sollum, E., Grythe, H., Kristiansen, N. I., Cassiani, M., Eckhardt, S., Arnold, D., Morton, D., Thompson, R. L., Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Evangeliou, N., Sodemann, H., Haimberger, L., Henne, S., Brunner, D., Burkhart, J. F., Fouilloux, A., Brioude, J., Philipp, A., Seibert, P., and Stohl, A.:
The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 10.4, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4955–4997, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prime, N., Smith, S. J., Ahsan, H., Hoesly, R. M., Mott, A., O'Rourke, P. R., McDuffie, E. E., Crippa, M., Klimont, Z., McDonald, B., Wang, S., Nicholson, M. B., and  Feng, L.: CEDS Version 2021-04-21 Aircraft Emissions Fix, Zenodo [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7846185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7846185</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prinn, R. G.:
Toward an improved global network for determination of tropospheric ozone climatology and trends, J. Atmos. Chem., 6, 281–298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053861" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053861</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Putero, D., Cristofanelli, P., Chang, K.-L., Dufour, G., Beachley, G., Couret, C., Effertz, P., Jaffe, D. A., Kubistin, D., Lynch, J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Puchalski, M., Sharac, T., Sive, B. C., Steinbacher, M., Torres, C., and Cooper, O. R.:
Fingerprints of the COVID-19 economic downturn and recovery on ozone anomalies at high-elevation sites in North America and western Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15693–15709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15693-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15693-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ramaswamy, V., Chanin, M.-L., Angell, J., Barnett, J., Gaffen, D., Gelman, M., Keckhut, P., Koshelkov, Y., Labitzke, K., Lin, J.-J. R., O'Neill, A., Nash, J., Randel, W., Rood, R., Shine, K., Shiotani, M., and Swinbank, R.:
Stratospheric temperature trends: Observations and model simulations, Rev. Geophys., 39, 71–122, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rotman, D. A., Tannahill, J. R., Kinnison, D. E., Connell, P. S., Bergmann, D., Proctor, D., Rodriguez, J. M., Lin, S. J., Rood, R. B., Prather, M. J., Rasch, P. J., Considine, D. B., Ramaroson, R., and Kawa, S. R.:
Global Modeling Initiative assessment model: Model description, integration, and testing of the transport shell, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 1669–1691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900463" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900463</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ryoo, J.-M., Johnson, M. S., Iraci, L. T., Yates, E. L., and Gore, W.:
Investigating sources of ozone over California using AJAX airborne measurements and models: assessing the long-range transport, Atmos. Environ., 155, 53–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.008</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Samphutthanont, R., Crawford, J. H., Pawarmart, I., ]Wisthaler, A., Swift, S. J. Piel, F., Wojnowski, W., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Yun, S.,Symonds, G., Day,D. A., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G. S., Crounse, J. D., Ball, K.,Wennberg,P. O., Lee, M., Gil, J., and Choochuay, C.:
A multi-platform validation of biomass burning emissions: Integrating ground, airborne, and satellite data to quantify regional haze health impacts in Thailand, Environ. Pollut., 405, 128576, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128576" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128576</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saunois, M., Emmons, L., Lamarque, J.-F., Tilmes, S., Wespes, C., Thouret, V., and Schultz, M.:
Impact of sampling frequency in the analysis of tropospheric ozone observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6757–6773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6757-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6757-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, S. J., Zhou, Y., Kyle, P., Wang, H., and Yu, H.: A Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) for Historical Emissions, in: 2015 International Emission Inventory Conference: Air Quality Challenges: Tackling the Changing Face of Emissions, 13–16 April 2015, San Diego, California, US EPA, Washington, D.C., PNNL-SA-109670, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Strode, S. A., Rodriguez, J. M., Logan, J. A., Cooper, O. R., Witte, J. C., Lamsal, L. N., Damon, M., Van Aartsen, B., Steenrod, S. D., and Strahan, S. E.:
Trends and variability in surface ozone over the United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9020–9042, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022784" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022784</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Strode, S. A., Worden, H. M., Damon, M., Douglass, A. R., Duncan, B. N., Emmons, L. K., Lamarque, J.-F., Manyin, M., Oman, L. D., Rodriguez, J. M., Strahan, S. E., and Tilmes, S.: Interpreting space-based trends in carbon monoxide with multiple models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7285–7294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7285-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7285-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. D., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 817–922, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tarasick, D., Galbally, I. E., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Ancellet, G., Leblanc, T., Wallington, T. J., Ziemke, J., Liu, X., Steinbacher, M., Staehelin, J., Vigouroux, C., Hannigan, J. W., García, O., Foret, G., Zanis, P., Weatherhead, E., Petropavlovskikh, I., Worden, H., Osman, M., Liu, J., Chang, K.-L., Gaudel, A., Lin, M., Granados-Muñoz, M., Thompson, A. M., Oltmans, S. J., Cuesta, J., Dufour, G., Thouret, V., Hassler, B., Trickl, T., and Neu, J. L.:
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Tropospheric ozone from 1877 to 2016, observed levels, trends and uncertainties, Elem. Sci. Anth., 7, 39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.376" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.376</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thompson, A. M., Stauffer, R. M., Boyle, T. P., Kollonige, D. E., Miyazaki, K., Tzortziou, M., Herman, J. R., Abuhassan, N., Jordan, C. E., and Lamb, B. T.:
Comparison of Near-Surface NO<sub>2</sub> Pollution With Pandora Total Column NO<sub>2</sub> During the Korea-United States Ocean Color (KORUS OC) Campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 13560–13575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030765" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030765</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thorp, T., Arnold, S. R., Pope, R. J., Spracklen, D. V., Conibear, L., Knote, C., Arshinov, M., Belan, B., Asmi, E., Laurila, T., Skorokhod, A. I., Nieminen, T., and Petäjä, T.:
Late-spring and summertime tropospheric ozone and NO<sub>2</sub> in western Siberia and the Russian Arctic: regional model evaluation and sensitivities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4677–4697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4677-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4677-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tong, D., Pan, L., Chen, W., Lamsal, L., Lee, P., Tang, Y., Kim, H., Kondragunta, S., and Stajner, I.:
Impact of the 2008 Global Recession on air quality over the United States: Implications for surface ozone levels from changes in NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9280–9288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069885" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069885</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
      
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA):
Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants, EPA/600/R-20/012,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
      
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA):
Policy Assessment for the Reconsideration of the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards, External Review Draft Version 2, EPA-452/P-23-002, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Malderen, R., Zang, Z., Chang, K.-L., Björklund, R., Cooper, O. R., Liu, J., Maillard Barras, E., Vigouroux, C., Petropavlovskikh, I., Leblanc, T., Thouret, V., Wolff, P., Effertz, P., Gaudel, A., Tarasick, D. W., Smit, H. G. J., Thompson, A. M., Stauffer, R. M., Kollonige, D. E., Poyraz, D., Ancellet, G., De Backer, M.-R., Frey, M. M., Hannigan, J. W., Hernandez, J. L., Johnson, B. J., Jones, N., Kivi, R., Mahieu, E., Morino, I., McConville, G., Müller, K., Murata, I., Notholt, J., Piters, A., Prignon, M., Querel, R., Rizi, V., Smale, D., Steinbrecht, W., Strong, K., and Sussmann, R.:
Ground-based tropospheric ozone measurements: regional tropospheric ozone column trends from the TOAR-II/HEGIFTOM homogenized datasets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 9905–9935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9905-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9905-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
      
Verstraeten, W. W., Neu, J. L., Williams, J. E., Bowman, K. W., Worden, J. R., and Boersma, K. F.:
Rapid increases in tropospheric ozone production and export from China, Nat. Geosci. 8: 690–695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2493" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2493</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, H., Lu, X., Jacob, D. J., Cooper, O. R., Chang, K.-L., Li, K., Gao, M., Liu, Y., Sheng, B., Wu, K., Wu, T., Zhang, J., Sauvage, B., Nédélec, P., Blot, R., and Fan, S.:
Global tropospheric ozone trends, attributions, and radiative impacts in 1995–2017: an integrated analysis using aircraft (IAGOS) observations, ozonesonde, and multi-decadal chemical model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13753–13782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13753-2022</a>, 2022a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, T., Dai, J., Lam, K. S., Nan Poon, C., and Brasseur, G. P.:
Twenty-five years of lower tropospheric ozone observations in tropical East Asia: The influence of emissions and weather patterns, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 11463–11470, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084459" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084459</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, X., Fu, T.-M., Zhang, L., Lu, X., Liu, X., Amnuaylojaroen, T., Latif, M. T., Ma, Y., Zhang, L., Feng, X., Zhu, L., Shen, H., and Yang, X: Rapidly Changing Emissions Drove Substantial Surface and Tropospheric Ozone Increases Over Southeast Asia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100223" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100223</a>, 2022b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. L., and Lazar, N. A.:
Moving to a world beyond <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, Am. Stat., 73, 1–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
      
WHO:
WHO global air quality guidelines. Particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xue, L., Ding, A., Cooper, O., Huang, X., Wang, W., Zhou, D., Wu, Z., McClure-Begley, A., Petropavlovskikh, I., Andreae, M. O., and Fu, C.:
ENSO and Southeast Asian biomass burning modulate subtropical trans-Pacific ozone transport, Natl. Sci. Rev., 8, nwaa132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa132</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yates, E. L., Iraci, L. T., Kulawik, S. S., Ryoo, J.-M., Marrero, J. E., Parworth, C. L., St. Clair, J. M., Hanisco, T. F., Bui, T. P. V., Chang, C. S., and Dean-Day, J. M.:
An extensive database of airborne trace gas and meteorological observations from the Alpha Jet Atmospheric eXperiment (AJAX), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2375–2389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2375-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2375-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, L., Jacob, D. J., Boersma, K. F., Jaffe, D. A., Olson, J. R., Bowman, K. W., Worden, J. R., Thompson, A. M., Avery, M. A., Cohen, R. C., Dibb, J. E., Flock, F. M., Fuelberg, H. E., Huey, L. G., McMillan, W. W., Singh, H. B., and Weinheimer, A. J.:
Transpacific transport of ozone pollution and the effect of recent Asian emission increases on air quality in North America: an integrated analysis using satellite, aircraft, ozonesonde, and surface observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6117–6136, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6117-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6117-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Cooper, O. R., Gaudel, A., Thompson, A. M., Nédélec, P., Ogino, S.-Y., and West, J. J.:
Tropospheric ozone change from 1980 to 2010 dominated by equatorward redistribution of emissions, Nat. Geosci., 9, 875–879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2827</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Zheng, B.:
On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13011–13022, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ziemke, J. R., Douglass, A. R., Oman, L. D., Strahan, S. E., and Duncan, B. N.:
Tropospheric ozone variability in the tropics from ENSO to MJO and shorter timescales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8037–8049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8037-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8037-2015</a>, 2015.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Strode, S. A., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., McPeters, R. D., Bhartia, P. K., Froidevaux, L., Labow, G. J., Witte, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Haffner, D. P., Kramarova, N. A., Frith, S. M., Huang, L.-K., Jaross, G. R., Seftor, C. J., Deland, M. T., and Taylor, S. L.:
Trends in global tropospheric ozone inferred from a composite record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS satellite measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3257–3269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
