<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-1277-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Cloud Chamber Studies on the Linear Depolarisation Ratio of Small Cirrus Ice Crystals</article-title><alt-title>Cloud Chamber Studies on the Linear Depolarisation Ratio of Small Cirrus Ice Crystals</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hamel</surname><given-names>Adrian</given-names></name>
          <email>adrian.hamel@kit.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5744-2612</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Schnaiter</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9560-8072</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Saito</surname><given-names>Masanori</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5188-7471</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>Robert</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-5432</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Järvinen</surname><given-names>Emma</given-names></name>
          <email>jaervinen@uni-wuppertal.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-1759</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Aerosol Research (IMKAAF), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>schnaiTEC GmbH, Wuppertal, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Adrian Hamel (adrian.hamel@kit.edu) and Emma Järvinen (jaervinen@uni-wuppertal.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>26</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1277</fpage><lpage>1300</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>August</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Adrian Hamel et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e142">Space-borne lidar, in combination with other remote sensing instrumentation, has been used to infer vertical profiles of ice cloud properties from A-train satellites, and more recently, also from the newly launched EarthCARE mission. However, accurately retrieving ice crystal microphysical properties from lidar signals requires a thorough understanding of their relationship to backscattering characteristics. Cloud chambers can be used to study the link under a controlled environment. This study investigates the link between the linear depolarisation ratio in the near-backscattering direction (178°) and the ice microphysical properties for 47 cloud experiments at cirrus temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Predominantly small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>diameter</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) columnar and irregularly shaped ice crystals were grown under distinct conditions of supersaturation with respect to ice. A statistical and visual analysis of size, shape and morphological complexity reveals that more than 40 % of the columnar particles exhibit hollowness on the basal facets. Ice crystals larger than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show depolarisation ratios below 0.3, which is lower than typical values observed in mid-latitude cirrus but in agreement with polar cirrus observations. Two temperature-dependent depolarisation ratio–size modes were found and successfully reproduced with ray tracing simulations of hollow columns incorporating surface roughness, hollowness and internal scattering. These results are important for the interpretation of the linear depolarisation ratio of small ice crystals in active remote sensing or can be used for evaluating the performance of state-of-the-art optical particle models, especially for small size parameters below 100.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft</funding-source>
<award-id>VH-NG-1531</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e208">Depolarisation lidar measurements are useful to identify the presence of ice clouds because the non-spherical ice particles alter the polarisation during the scattering process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.1"/>. Furthermore, size and shape affect the linear depolarisation ratio of ice crystals, but the link is highly complex <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.2"/>. Therefore, retrieving cirrus microphysical properties using the linear depolarisation ratio is challenging. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.3"/> showed a decrease in the linear depolarisation ratio for increasing altitude and decreasing temperature using two-year global linear depolarisation ratio data of ice clouds measured by the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) onboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.4"/> found a strong correlation between temperature and linear depolarisation ratio. This highlights that models using a vertically homogenous ice crystal shape model are inappropriate for radiative transfer calculations.</p>
      <p id="d2e223">Numerical studies have suggested that it is possible to use linear depolarisation properties to infer ice crystal shape information. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.5"/> introduced a shape classification technique for hexagonal ice crystals where higher depolarisation ratios are associated with columns (higher aspect ratios) and low depolarisation ratios with plates (lower aspect ratios). Assuming pristine ice crystals, they identified four classes of aspect ratios from the linear depolarisation ratio based on ray tracing simulations. In addition, global cirrus cloud particle habit fractions were derived from CALIOP satellite LIDAR data using the physical particle model, an improved geometric optics ray tracing methods which includes multiple scattering effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.6"/>. Not only shape but also size information is suggested to be inferred from lidar backscattering depolarisation measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.7"/>. The ray tracing simulations of pristine columns over a size range from 10–1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the geometric optics approximation showed that the linear depolarisation ratio for hexagonal ice crystals oscillates with the ice crystal size. For absorbing wavelengths where the ice crystals are not transparent (e.g. 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the absorption also decreases the linear depolarisation ratio with size.</p>
      <p id="d2e255">However, the applicability of these numerical results produced with idealized crystal geometry to atmospheric remote sensing observations is highly uncertain because recent studies have observed that cirrus ice crystals rarely show idealized hexagonal shape and almost always contain some degree of morphological complexity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.8"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.9"/> used the Invariant Imbedding T-Matrix (IITM) and the improved geometric optics method (IGOM) to model the effects of both size and surface roughness on the linear depolarisation ratio of hexagonal ice crystals with an aspect ratio of one. They concluded that the ice crystal roughness has a strong impact on the backscattering properties, which needs to be included in order to simulate observational data. Adding hollowness to the basal facets of bullet rosette ice crystals was found to lower the backscattering linear depolarisation ratio using improved geometric ray tracing simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.10"/>. Furthermore, a decreasing trend in linear depolarisation ratio for increasing particle size was seen that was not present for solid bullet rosettes.</p>
      <p id="d2e267">Cloud chamber experiments have proved useful for studying the link between ice morphological and optical properties under well-defined atmospheric conditions (e.g. temperature or ice saturation ratio). Previous studies have shown high linear depolarisation ratios in the near-backscattering direction (178°) of up to 0.4 for sublimating small ice crystals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at a temperature range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.11"/>. A cloud chamber study conducted at a higher temperature range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.12"/> showed large discrepancies between the measured linear depolarisation ratio and simulations assuming idealized pristine hexagonal shapes for larger ice crystals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>maximum dimension</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the near-backscattering (178°) and the backscattering (180°) directions. These discrepancies could be reduced by assuming stepped hollowness and by using a tilted facet method in the ray tracing simulations to account for ice crystal complexity.</p>
      <p id="d2e374">This study advances previous work on the relationship between ice microphysical properties and linear depolarisation ratio by providing a more statistically robust analysis, based on a multi-year dataset from four laboratory cloud chamber campaigns. In total, 47 ice cloud simulation experiments were conducted under well-controlled conditions at cirrus temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A key strength of this study is the ability to control ice crystal growth under specific, known temperature and supersaturation conditions, enabling a direct assessment of how particle size, shape, and optical complexity influence depolarisation signals. In addition, the measurements are compared with results from conventional as well as state-of-the-art light scattering models. Together, this approach provides new insight into the microphysical drivers of depolarisation and offers improved constraints for the interpretation of active remote sensing observations of cirrus clouds.</p>
      <p id="d2e403">The microphysical and optical instrumentation used to measure the microphysical and optical properties of the cloud chamber grown ice particles are introduced in Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>. The experimental procedures and the numerical simulations are detailed in Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/> contains a detailed analysis of the microphysical properties, such as size, small-scale complexity and hollowness, of the cloud chamber grown ice particles. Hereafter, the microphysical properties size (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>) and small-scale complexity (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>) are linked to the linear depolarisation ratio, with the main outcome being the evolution of the linear depolarisation ratio as a function of the particle size. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/> compares the experimental results to different numerical T-matrix and ray tracing light scattering simulations. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, the cloud chamber measurements are compared to previous cloud chamber and atmospheric observations and the limitations of the different numerical simulations and of the ice particle morphology representation are discussed. A summary of the study is provided in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d2e435">In this section, details about the experimental setup and procedures are provided, including the cloud chamber and the optical and microphysical instrumentation that was operated during the experiments. Furthermore, the numerical simulations that are used as a comparison to the experimental results are described.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Optical instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d2e445">The linear depolarisation ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of an ensemble of ice particles in the cloud chamber is measured with the SIMONE (Streulichtintensitätsmessungen zum optischen Nachweis von Eispartikeln – Scattering Intensity Measurements for the Optical Detection of Ice Particles) instrument <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.13"/>. A schematic setup is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a.</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e462">Schematic setup of the SIMONE instrument in top view <bold>(a)</bold> and calibration process of SIMONE-Junior for the RICE03 campaign with a scattering target inside the sensing volume <bold>(b)</bold>. PAR refers to incident polarisation parallel to the scattering plane and PER refers to linear polarisation perpendicular to the scattering plane. The calibration factor is determined using the linear depolarisation ratio of the scattering target which is independent of the polarisation direction of the incident light.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e477">The instrument measures the scattered intensity in the near forward direction (2°) and in the near-backscattering direction (178°) from a 488 nm continuous wave laser beam propagating through the cloud chamber. Well-mixed conditions and random particle orientations persist due to operating a mixing fan in the cloud chamber. The detection volume of approximately 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined by the overlap between the laser beam and field of view of the detector. The laser beam is linearly polarised and the polarisation axis can be rotated with a liquid crystal rotator. For this study, a polarisation parallel to the scattering plane is chosen. In the 178° direction the scattered light is split with a polarising beam splitter and the resulting co- and cross-polarised states are analysed using two photomultiplier tubes (Perkin Elmer MP-1383). The response of the two photomultiplier tubes are calibrated for each campaign using a Spectralon target with a known linear depolarisation ratio that can be placed in the scattering center inside the cloud chamber <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.14"/>. For the RICE03 campaign, data from a different instrument with the same operation principle (SIMONE-Junior), an emission wavelength of 552 nm and a detection volume of approximately 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were used, which is described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.15"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e509">During the calibration process, which is identical for SIMONE and SIMONE-Junior, the polarisation of the incident light is switched between parallel and perpendicular orientation with reference to the scattering plane. A calibration factor is multiplied to the channel, which records the intensity with parallel polarisation, in order to obtain the same linear depolarisation ratio for the linearly polarised incident light at both orientations. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b shows the calibration process exemplary for measurement campaign RICE03, where a calibration factor of 1.4908 was derived for SIMONE-Junior. The calibration factor takes into account the different gains of the detectors, different losses of the polarisation filtering and effects of possible differences in alignment of the detectors. The measurement uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is 2.1 %, derived as the standard deviation of the linear depolarisation ratio of the scattering target measured during the calibration process. Experiments with supercooled liquid droplets were conducted at the AIDA cloud chamber to validate the measurement uncertainty because the linear depolarisation ratio of liquid and thus spherical droplets vanishes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.16"/>. The mean linear depolarisation ratio of 12 experiments of supercooled liquid clouds at an initial gas temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The derivation from the theoretical value of 0 % is well below the measurement uncertainty of 2.1 % derived from the calibration with the scattering target. Additional information about the supercooled liquid droplet experiments is provided in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e562">The linear depolarisation ratio for incoming light with a polarisation parallel to the scattering plane <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.17"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M22" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the background-subtracted light intensity with a polarisation perpendicular to the scattering plane and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a polarisation parallel to the scattering plane. The linear depolarisation ratio from the SIMONE instrument is averaged over time intervals of 10 s. Hereafter we refer to it as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on an estimation of the optical depth from the particle microphysics measurements, below 10 % of the intensity detected with SIMONE can be affected by multiple scattering effects for 89.9 % of the measurement data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Microphysical instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d2e685">The particle size, shape and small-scale morphological complexity are optically characterised using the Particle Phase Discriminator 2 Karlsruhe edition (PPD-2K) and the Small Ice Detector 3 (SID-3) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.18"/>. Both instruments are optical particle counters that detect the scattered light of individual particles. A sample air flow passes the measurement volume that is defined by the overlap between the laser beam with a wavelength of 532 nm from a frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser and the field of view of the trigger optics. The design of the trigger optics differs in both instruments. In PPD-2K, a beam splitter diverts 8 % of the forward scattering light to the trigger detector. SID-3 uses two nested trigger detectors with half angles of 9.25° at an angle of 50° to the forward scattering direction. In both instruments, the trigger intensity is detected with a photomultiplier tube and used to determine the size of the individual particles with a maximum count rate of 11 kHz. A special feature of SID-3 and PPD-2K is that they use an intensified Photek ICCD218 camera to record the spatial intensity distribution of the forward scattered light over an annulus between approximately 5° and 26° with a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">780</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">592</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (SID-3) and between 7.4° and 25.6° with a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">582</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">592</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (PPD-2K). Images are taken for a subset of the triggered particle events due to the camera's maximum imaging rate of 30 Hz. These diffraction patterns contain information on the particle habit and morphological complexity at scales of the wavelength of the used light. Both instruments were operated simultaneously. Here we use PPD-2K for getting the size information due to higher counting statistics compared to SID-3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.19"/> and SID-3 for getting information on the crystal shape and degree of morphological complexity, similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.20"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e737">PPD-2K measures the trigger intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of each particle. To relate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the particle size, the spherical equivalent diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is used, which is the diameter of a sphere that scatters the same intensity in the direction of the PPD-2K trigger field of view at polar angles between 7.4° and 25.6° as the recorded particle. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated from the trigger intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using the following equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.21"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M33" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where calibration coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on the laser power and PMT gain and calibration coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.522</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on the trigger geometry and must be around 0.5 because the scattered intensity is proportional to the geometric cross section of the particle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.22"/>. For each measurement campaign, the factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is calibrated with spherical droplets where the size is determined comparing the Mie fringes of the diffraction patterns to Mie theory (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.23"/> for details). The ice crystal maximum dimension is estimated to be approximately 1.0–2.5 times larger than the spherical equivalent diameter depending on the crystal shape and complexity (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e833">Besides particle size, other microphysical features can be extracted from the diffraction patterns recorded by PPD-2K and SID-3, such as particle shape and degree of crystal complexity. The degree of crystal complexity can be derived from a speckle pattern texture analysis of the diffraction patterns, and is represented by the ice crystal normalised energy feature parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.24"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a measure for particle complexity with scales around the laser wavelength of the incident light, 532 nm, including surface roughness, polycrystallinity and (stepped) hollowness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.25"/>. The parameter ranges between about 3.8 and 7.0 and a threshold of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>thr</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.26"/> for the SID-3 measurements, where lower values correspond to pristine particles and higher values for morphologically complex particles. Similarly to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.27"/>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is only calculated for particles with trigger intensities between 10 counts and 25 counts in this work to reduce the effect of particle size biases on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is caused by varying mean intensity of the diffraction pattern images. In this work, the probability of coincident particle sampling is below 1 % with a maximum detected particle concentration of 42.6 and 22.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by PPD-2K and SID-3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.28"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e927">Furthermore, the particle shape is derived from the diffraction patterns. If there are clear maxima in the azimuthally integrated polar profile (Mie fringes) the particle is considered spherical and is classified as a droplet (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>d). Otherwise, a discrete fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the polar integrated azimuth intensity profile is performed for the shape identification following the procedure of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.29"/>. Maximum Fourier coefficients of order 2 and 4 indicate a columnar shape (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>c) and maximum Fourier coefficients of order 3 and 6 indicate a hexagonal plate (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>a). If the maximum coefficient is of a non-symmetric order the particles are interpreted as irregulars (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b). It needs to be noted that if a particle is classified as irregular it does not necessarily mean that it has an irregular shape. Irregular diffraction patterns may also result from sufficiently roughed columnar or hexagonal ice particles, which do not show their usual, distinct diffraction patterns. Furthermore, the fraction of columns and plates should be seen as a lower limit because the random particle orientations can lead to bent arcs in the scattering patterns of pristine hexagonal ice particles, which may occasionally be falsely interpreted as irregulars. Out of 100 random ice particles classified as irregulars by the Fourier method, 11 hexagonal ice particles with bent arcs were manually identified.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e944">Example diffraction patterns of PPD-2K from the RICE01 campaign are shown for a plate <bold>(a)</bold>, an irregular particle <bold>(b)</bold> a column <bold>(c)</bold> and a sphere (droplet) <bold>(d)</bold>. The standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the logarithm of the particle diameter is shown as a function of geometric mean diameter (GMD) for log-normal fits to the particle size distributions at temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<bold>(e)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e992">In this work, the measured single particle scattering information is converted into particle size distributions using 50 bins in a size range between about 7 and 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on the campaign-specific size calibration. The particle size distributions are averaged over 10 s and a log-normal size distribution function is fitted to obtain the geometric mean diameter (GMD) and the standard deviation of the logarithm of GMD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The log-normal particle size distribution is defined as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.30"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M47" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>GMD</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle diameter. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>e shows the retrieved log-normal parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over GMD. Most <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are in a range between 1.1 and 1.5 with some outliers to higher values. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has a mean value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For all curve fits with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has a mean value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1182">To analyse the size of ice crystals that are smaller than the lower size limit of PPD-2K (7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) was used to determine the particle size during the HALO06 campaign <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.31"/>. The FTIR measures the spectral extinction of the ice particle ensemble at wave numbers between 6000 and 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At mid-infrared wavelengths, the extinction spectra only vary slightly with particle shape unless highly irregular habits are involved. For this study, similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.32"/>, the ice particle size distribution was assumed to be log-normal and retrieved from the measured extinction spectra using T-matrix calculations for a fixed aspect ratio of 0.7 (circular columns). The FTIR retrieval provides reliable results down to mean particle maximum dimensions of about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p>
      <p id="d2e1223">Furthermore, a formvar replicator was operated in the cloud chamber during measurement campaigns RICE01 and RICE03 to generate replicas of the ice crystals on a 35 mm transparent plastic film strip. Details can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.33"/>. The formvar replicas are analysed using a Zeiss IM35 inverted microscope with a magnification of up to 500 and an Imaging Source DFK41AU02 camera with a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1280</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">960</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The images of the replicas allow to obtain additional information about the particle shape that cannot be derived from the diffraction patterns, such as information about hollowness, but the statistics are poorer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Experiment procedure</title>
      <p id="d2e1257">The expansion experiments were conducted in the Aerosol Interactions and Dynamics in the Atmosphere (AIDA) cloud chamber at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.34"/>. Here, the data from different ice nucleation measurement campaigns at cirrus temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are analysed (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). The temporal evolution of a typical experiment is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>. The expansion experiments are conducted with the following procedure discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.35"/>: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1299">Preparation: The cloud chamber is cleaned by evacuation and flushing cycles and then humidified to ice-saturated conditions by forming a thin ice coating on the inner chamber walls.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1303">Aerosol addition: The aerosols are added with an aerosol generator. The particle types were soot or mineral dust for heterogeneous ice nucleation experiments and sulphuric acid solution droplets for homogeneous freezing experiments.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1307">Initial cloud activation: A cloud chamber expansion is started by opening the valve to the vacuum pumps. The start of pumping is indicated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> as reference time zero. The pressure and gas temperature in the cloud chamber decrease (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a) and the relative humidity (RH) increases (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b). RH is measured with a tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.36"/>. When the relative humidity with respect to ice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reaches homogeneous freezing conditions or exceeds the aerosol-specific threshold for heterogeneous ice nucleation, the ice nucleation process starts, e.g. at 2 min in Fig. 2d. The nucleated ice crystals deplete the supersaturation in the gas phase, leading to a reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Once the particles reach sizes that are larger than the detection limit of the PPD-2K instrument particles are detected.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1343">Sublimation: In order to remove the ice crystal morphological complexity from the initial growth period, the expansion is stopped and dry synthetic air is fed into the chamber between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the experiment, increasing the gas pressure again (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a). This further reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to below 100 % (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b), leading to a decrease of the ice particle size by sublimation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>d).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1397">Regrowth: The dry air flow is stopped and the evacuation of the cloud chamber is resumed, leading to a second, controlled growth period at a defined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-level above 100 %. This can be seen between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b), when the particle size increases again due to growth at this defined supersaturation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>d). Multiple sublimation and controlled regrowth cycles can be done in one experiment.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1448">Final sublimation: The expansion is stopped and due to the heat transfer from the chamber walls, whose temperatures have only slightly decreased during the expansion, the humidity in the cloud chamber falls below ice saturation, initiating the ice cloud sublimation. This can be seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1471">Example expansion experiment 06 from the RICE02 campaign. Initial growth, sublimation and two regrowth cycles can be seen. The gas pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, gas temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>gas</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and wall temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>wall</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inside the cloud chamber <bold>(a)</bold>, the relative humidity with respect to water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>water</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>, the linear depolarisation ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from SIMONE <bold>(c)</bold> and the geometric mean diameter (GMD) derived from from PPD-2K <bold>(d)</bold> are shown as a function of time after the start of the experiment.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1554">Campaigns that are used for the analysis of the linear depolarisation ratio.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Campaign</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SIMONE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Size data</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Number of</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">wavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">from</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">experiments analysed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HALO06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">January–February 2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">488 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">FTIR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RICE01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">November 2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">488 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PPD-2K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RICE02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">April–May 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">488 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PPD-2K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RICE03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">December 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">552 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PPD-2K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1686">To correlate the linear depolarisation ratio to the particle size at cirrus temperatures, the following conditions are applied: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1691">The gas temperature of the cloud chamber <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>gas</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1722">The expansion was started.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1726">The SIMONE forward scattering intensity is above a threshold value to obtain high enough counts on the photomultipliers for an accurate retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> counts for SIMONE and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> counts for SIMONE-Junior). The SIMONE instruments use an automated neutral density filter system to avoid saturation of the photomultiplier and increase the range of detection. The counts measured with the neutral density filter are normalized to the counts without neutral density filter.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1759">The GMD determined by a log-normal fit is at most 20 % smaller than the center of smallest bin of the PPD-2K size range to ensure an accurate retrieval of GMD: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mtext>GMD</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The center of the smallest bin ranges between 6.4 and 7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on the campaign specific calibration and photomultiplier gain settings.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1792">The particle concentration measured with PPD-2K is larger than a lower threshold of 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to ensure PPD-2K measures enough particle events during the 10 s integration time for a log-normal fit to the particle size distribution.</p></list-item></list> Only those data points of the linear depolarisation ratio and GMD are used for further analysis where the conditions above are fulfilled. This leads to 24 % of data being discarded due to PPD-2K limitations. This discarded data is predominantly due to low particle concentration or small particle sizes that regularly occur in the sublimation phase of the expansion experiments and can only be detected by SIMONE and not by PPD-2K. The data is averaged over the same 10 s periods for both instruments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Numerical simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e1819">Transition matrix (T-matrix) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.37"/> and conventional geometric optics (CGOM) ray tracing Monte Carlo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.38"/> methods are used to simulate the near-backscattering depolarisation ratio that is measured with the SIMONE instrument. Here we use the T-matrix code from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.39"/> to perform the T-matrix simulations of spheroidal particles, which are constrained to small size parameters below approximately 50 due to computational limitations. The assumption of spheroidal particle shapes is a rough approximation of the hexagonal shape of ice particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.40"/>. Therefore, as a comparison to the T-matrix approach, which is widely used in LIDAR applications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, light scattering simulations of hexagonal ice crystals with the Invariant-Imbedding T-matrix Method (IITM) for size parameters of up to 158 are additionally compared to the measurement data.</p>
      <p id="d2e1839">For size parameters larger than 90 we use CGOM simulations of hexagonal particles with a tilted facet method and internal scatterers to generate complex ice crystals. The size parameter is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with characteristic particle length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the light in the surrounding medium. A wavelength of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">488</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a refractive index of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used.</p>
      <p id="d2e1905">All simulations calculate the scattering matrix elements that are needed to obtain the linear depolarisation ratio. For this, the assumption of randomly oriented ice particles is used. The linear depolarisation ratio for incident polarisation parallel to the scattering plane <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for an arbitrary scattering angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.42"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M93" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the scattering matrix elements obtained from the CGOM and T-matrix simulations for the scattering angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2068">The T-matrix method is applied to simulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the light scattered by randomly oriented pristine spheroids with aspect ratios ranging between 1.5 and 2.0. This range is based on the replica images that are presented later. In order to be comparable to the measurements, the T-matrix scattering matrix elements are integrated over a log-normal size distribution similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.43"/> with 82 particle sizes varying from 0.01–10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.21. This is the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> found in the log-normal fits to the PPD-2K particle size distributions with GMD smaller than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximum dimension of the spheroids is used for the comparison to the PPD-2K spherical equivalent diameter.</p>
      <p id="d2e2117">Furthermore, we use a dataset of numerically exact IITM simulations of hexagonal ice crystals published in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.44"/>. It simulates particle complexity as surface roughness. The degree of this surface roughness is defined by the variance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of a two-dimensional Gaussian distribution of local planar surface slopes. The scattering matrix elements are integrated over a log-normal size distribution with 31 particle sizes between 0.1 and 24.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.21 for particle sizes of up to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.26 for larger particle sizes. The dataset was computed using the refractive index of ice at 532 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3116</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which differs slightly from that at 488 nm. This difference has a marginal effect on light scattering in the backward direction.  The aspect ratio ranges from 1.0–2.0, with decreasing maximum particle size for increasing aspect ratio due to increasing computational effort.</p>
      <p id="d2e2197">The CGOM simulations use hexagonal ice particles and average over 2 million particle orientations. The calculated scattering matrix elements are integrated over a log-normal size distribution with 42 particle sizes between 8.4 and 37.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.26. This is the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of all fits to PPD-2K cirrus particle size distributions. Ice crystal complexity is represented with the tilted facet approach where a random tilt angle is applied to the ice crystal surface. A distortion parameter describes the maximum possible angle of a random tilt that is applied to the crystal surface. With a distortion of 0 no tilt is applied and a distortion of 0.5 is equivalent to a random tilt of up to 45°. Additional ice crystal complexity can be simulated with the mean free path by adding internal scatterers to the simulation that randomly change the direction of the internal rays <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.45"/>. In this work, the internal scattering is non-absorbing with a single scattering albedo of 0.999, representative of air bubbles. The mean free path is the mean distance that a simulated ray propagates through the crystal in the Monte Carlo simulation before changing direction due to the simulated internal scatterer. We have no direct information about concentration, size and type of internal scatterers inside the cloud chamber grown ice particles. Therefore, the mean free path is varied between 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for high internal scattering and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for negligible internal scattering to find the best overlap with the measurement data. The column length is used for the comparison to the PPD-2K spherical equivalent diameter.</p>
      <p id="d2e2255">The conversion between the particle sizes from the numerical simulations and the spherical equivalent diameter measured with PPD-2K is non-trivial and therefore an approximation is needed. In this work, we use the maximum dimension of the spheroidal particles and the column length of the hexagonal particles, which is common approach when analysing the optical properties of ice particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.46"/>. To estimate possible errors, the spherical equivalent diameter measured with PPD-2K is calculated for different complex shaped ice particles in Fig. A1. The maximum particle dimension can be up to 40 % larger than the spherical equivalent diameter for rough columnar and bullet rosette shaped ice particles. However, the column length of columnar particles can also be smaller than the maximum particle dimension, depending on its aspect ratio <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.47"/>. For example, a columnar particle with an aspect ratio of 1.5 has a maximum dimension, which is about 30 % larger than its length. These uncertainties in size conversion are shaded in the figures where the results of the numerical simulations are compared to the measurements with PPD-2K.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d2e2273">Since the linear depolarisation ratio is sensitive to the particle morphology, we start by giving an overview of the microphysical properties of our laboratory generated ice crystals. The key microphysical properties that were recorded were particle size and small-scale complexity. Then, the observed linear depolarisation ratio is shown as a function of particle size and small scale complexity and the observational results are compared to numerical simulations.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Microphysical properties of the cloud chamber grown cirrus</title>
      <p id="d2e2283">PPD-2K measured particle spherical equivalent diameters of up to 70.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for ice crystals nucleated and grown in the AIDA chamber at gas temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> shows histograms of the GMD of ice crystals grown between AIDA initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. At initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the median GMD was 17.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Interquartile range (IQR) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In comparison, ice crystals grown at lower cirrus temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had a median GMD of 10.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The GMD of ice crystals grown in the lower cirrus temperature range is 39 % smaller than of ice crystals grown in the higher cirrus temperature range. It is expected that ice crystals at higher temperatures grow to larger sizes, since at the same relative humidity the growth rate increases for increasing temperatures due to more available condensible water vapour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.48"/>. Ice crystals grown in the AIDA cloud chamber were limited to maximum sizes of about 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to sedimentation losses.</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2491">Histograms of geometric mean diamaters (GMD) derived from 10 s averaged PPD-2K particle size distributions for initial AIDA gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) and between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red). The vertical lines show the median values for the distributions. The median GMD of ice crystals grown at lower cirrus temperatures is 39 % smaller than of ice crystals grown at higher cirrus temperatures.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2552">A visual analysis of the ice crystal shapes was performed using microscope images of the formvar replicas during regrowth phases when the relative humidity was kept constant. This is done for a subsample of the cloud chamber experiments (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). The aim is to identify differences in the growth characteristics on the formvar replicas at different growth conditions. The relative humidity with respect to ice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the regrowth phases is varied between 105 % and 120 %. The number of columnar ice crystals and the number of hollow columnar ice crystals were manually counted per microscopic frame, which usually contained some tens of ice crystals. Out of the 11 096 imaged ice crystals on 324 microscope frames. 29 % were classified having columnar and 71 % of ice crystals were classified having other, mainly irregular shapes (see exemplary replicator images in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a–e). The irregular shapes were predominantly compact crystals that sometimes showed several c-axes radiating from a center point, resembling budding rosettes (e.g. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d). The columnar growth regime at temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with previous laboratory studies, e.g. by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.49"/>. They reported that for relative humidities below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mainly single columns grow, while for higher relative humidity (budding) rosettes are expected. In Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> the fraction of replicas classified as columnar is shown for different relative humidity with respect to ice between 105 % and 120 % and for different gas temperatures. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the column fraction ranges between 12 % and 25 % with no clear dependence on the relative humidity with respect to ice. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the fraction of replicas classified as columnar is larger than at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranging from 23 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to 59 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). At this temperature range the columnar fraction increases with increasing supersaturation in the regrowth phase. The higher column fraction with a mean of 41 % at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in comparison to a mean of 19 % at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> agrees well with previous results of laboratory-grown ice crystals by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.50"/>, where at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> more single crystal columns are expected in comparison to the transition region between columnar and plate-like growth regimes at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The observed transition towards columnar growth with increasing relative humidity between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">130</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has also been reported. Example microscope images of formvar replicas from experiment 29, 32, 38 and 40 of the RICE04 campaign are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>e, d, c, and a. Due to the small sample number, the fraction of columnar particles and hollow columnar particles seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> is not representative. Nonetheless, the general occurrence of hollowness on the prism faces at both cirrus temperatures and the smaller particles sizes at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in comparison to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be observed on the microscope images.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2849">Microscopic images of example formvar replicas of cloud chamber grown ice crystals highlighting different ice crystal complexities. The ice particles were grown at temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and relative humidity between 104 % and 116 %.  R03-30 stands for experiment 30 of measurement campaign RICE03. The hexagonal ice crystals in <bold>(a)</bold> show hollowness on the basal facets and occasionally have air inclusions and the ice crystal in <bold>(b)</bold> has a central dislocation. <bold>(c, e)</bold> show columnar and irregularly shaped ice crystals and in <bold>(d)</bold> budding rosettes can be seen.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2897">Statistically more robust information about ice crystal shapes can be derived from the SID-3 diffraction patterns using the Fourier analysis method. Of all particle images at cirrus temperatures of the investigated campaigns 0.4 % show diffraction patterns with features of spherical particles, 3.8 % show diffraction patterns with features of plates, 35 % show diffraction patterns with features of columns and 61 % show diffraction patterns with features of irregular ice particles. This is in good agreement with the fractions of columnar and irregular particles identified on the microscope images of the replicas taken during the regrowth phases of a subsample of the experiments (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a the fractions of the ice crystal shapes are shown for the different campaigns and temperature groups. It can be noted that the fraction of columns increases from 19 % (RICE01) and 18 % (RICE03) for initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 44 % (RICE01), 36 % (RICE02) and 38 % (RICE03) between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This characteristic was also seen in the replica analysis.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2960">Results of the analysis of the microscope images of the formvar replicas taken during regrowth phases. Only experiments are analysed where a stable relative humidity during the regrowth phase was achieved. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of investigated ice particles. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>col</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fraction of identified columnar particles of the total number of particles and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hollow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fraction of identified hollow columnar particles of all identified columnar particles. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>col</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (SID-3) is the fraction of columnar particles derived from the SID-3 diffraction patterns during the regrowth phases of the experiments as a comparison.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>gas</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col10" align="center" colsep="0"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Campaign</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RICE01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">RICE03 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">RICE01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col10" align="center">RICE03 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">508</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">787</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">764</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1516</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">424</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1350</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">638</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">406</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>col</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">40 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">39 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">42 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">59 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>col</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (SID-3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">42 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">43 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">43 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">47 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hollow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">36 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">70 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">29 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">120 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">105 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">107 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">111 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">105 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">109 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">108 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">112 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">120 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3358">Particle shape fractions that are determined from all forward scattering images taken with the SID-3 instrument during the different campaigns <bold>(a)</bold>. Each campaign is divided into two different groups. Cold refers to AIDA initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and warm to temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is plotted over the different campaigns. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>thr</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the threshold of 4.6 for morphologically complex ice crystals defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.51"/>. More complex ice particles are observed for the higher cirrus temperatures.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3453">Furthermore, different types of morphological complexities can be studied with the ice crystal replicas. The most common type of complexity is hollowness of the basal facets (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a) with occasional air inclusions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>e). Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> shows the fraction of hollow columns to all columns. This fraction varied between 33 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 73 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">107</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with a mean of 46 % for experiments initiated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At initial gas temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the mean fraction of columns that are hollow per experiment ranges between 4 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">109</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 70 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">112</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with a mean of 40 %. Hollow fractions below 30 % are only observed for experiments at initial gas temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, for both investigated temperatures a significant mean fraction of columns (more than 40 %) show hollowness. This is in contrast to a laboratory study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.52"/>, who estimated a critical supersaturation of 20 % for columns to develop hollowness at the basal facets at temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is not always possible to visually identify hollowness on the microscope images of the formvar replicas. Therefore, the observed fraction of columnar ice particles and hollow columnar ice particles should be considered as a lower limit. In atmospheric cirrus observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.53"/> found all bullets but only few columns to be hollow in microscope pictures of precipitation at cirrus temperatures at South Pole station between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.54"/> observed hollow ends in 52 %–80 % of all bullet-rosette and columnar particles of formvar replicas from balloon-borne mid-latitude cirrus observations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The increasing trend in the fraction of columns with hollow ends with temperature is in agreement with our cloud chamber observations.  Another type of crystal complexity that was observed on the replicas are dislocations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>b). They are thought to form from thermal stress in the changing growth conditions that can be present during the experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.55"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3666">Due to the optical limitation of the microscope and the replication technique, it is not possible to make conclusions about sub-micron scale complexity, such as surface roughness, from the microscope replica analysis.  For this, we use the crystal complexity information derived from the SID-3 diffraction patterns. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>b shows a statistical analysis of the optical complexity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the different campaigns and temperature groups. For the ice crystals grown in the higher temperature range, the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is with 5.22 clearly higher than the threshold of 4.6 defined for morphologically complex ice crystals. In the lower cirrus temperature range median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is with 4.54 below the threshold of complex ice crystals. One reason can be that higher growth rates at higher temperatures promote crystal complexity, as discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.56"/>. In addition, small differences can be seen in the fraction of columnar ice crystals and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the different measurement campaigns in the same temperature groups. For example, RICE03 has a higher median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in comparison to RICE02 and RICE01 in both temperature groups. These differences can be explained by different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the experiments of the different campaigns. In the next section, we analyse the depolarisation properties for each of the two temperature ranges separately.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Effects of particle size on the linear depolarisation ratio</title>
      <p id="d2e3749">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown as a function of GMD derived from the PPD-2K particle size distributions for the previously defined temperature ranges. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a shows the data in the higher temperature range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has a minimum of 0.08 for a GMD around 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and increases for both larger and smaller GMD up to 0.3. In the lower temperature range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during RICE01 and RICE02, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has a constant low value between 0.05 and 0.10 for sizes between 8 and 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b). For smaller sizes below 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed during the HALO06 campaign, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases sharply and reaches values up to 0.5. These are two distinct temperature-dependent depolarisation ratio–size modes. However, the data from the RICE03 campaign show a similar behaviour as for the higher temperature range in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a. This difference is likely caused by more complex crystals during the lower cirrus temperatures of RICE03 with a median higher than the threshold value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>thr</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). A detailed comparison to previous atmospheric observations is given in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>. In the following section, we investigate the link between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the optical crystal complexity.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3903">Linear depolarisation ratio measured with SIMONE as a function of geometric mean diameter (GMD) of the ice particles measured with the PPD-2K and FTIR instruments. <bold>(a)</bold> includes all measurements with initial cloud chamber temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Each data point represents 10 s averaged measurement data out of multiple experiments, which consisted of multiple growth and sublimation phases with different pump speeds.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Effects of the optical crystal complexity on the linear depolarisation ratio</title>
      <p id="d2e3979">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown as a function of the optical crystal complexity metric derived from SID-3 measurements for all available cirrus temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are determined and a linear regression is added for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is done separately for each campaign where SID-3 was operated. The results are separated into size groups of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to limit the effect of a possible size dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4144">Linear depolarisation ratio as a function of optical particle complexity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured with the SID-3 instrument for the RICE01 campaign <bold>(a)</bold>, for the RICE02 campaign <bold>(b)</bold> and for the RICE03 campaign <bold>(c)</bold> with linear fits to the data. Only a weak to moderate correlation is observed.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4173">For the smaller three particle size ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates no or weak correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Only for the largest size range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a moderate correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is observed. The scarcity of particles in this largest size group during the RICE02 measurement campaign can be attributed to the lower initial gas temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to RICE01 and RICE03, which included experiments at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Higher growth temperatures promote the formation of larger ice particles through increased growth rates at the same relative humidity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.57"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4358">The weak to moderate correlation between the optical complexity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the depolarisation ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contrasts with previous studies, which have reported increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing surface roughness in the 5–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> size range <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.58"/>. Using numerical simulations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.59"/> showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with increasing surface roughness up to a threshold of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, beyond which additional roughening has little to no further effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most of the crystals in our experiments fall within the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which could indicate that their surface roughness was already above this threshold – potentially explaining the weak dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on optical complexity.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.60"/> found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is indicative of moderately to strongly roughened crystals, supporting this interpretation. Growing more pristine crystals with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would require very low supersaturations and long growth times, conditions that are difficult to maintain in the AIDA cloud chamber due to sedimentation losses.  Alternatively, other morphological features not captured by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, such as crystal habits, may have varied across experiments and influenced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, further weakening the observed correlation. This highlights the complexity of the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ice crystal morphology.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Comparison of measurements to numerical simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e4522">In this section, the measurement data for the two temperature ranges are compared to two types of T-matrix simulations and to conventional geometric optics numerical (CGOM) simulations at the near-backscattering direction of 178°. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from T-matrix numerical simulations of spheroidal particles and CGOM simulations of columns with hollow basal facets, together with the measurement data from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>. The simulation parameters are detailed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>. With the assumption of spheroidal particle shapes – a rough approximation of the real, much more complex ice particle shapes – the T-matrix simulations reproduce the size-dependence of the measurement data well in the size range of about 2–9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Overall, the T-matrix results of spheroidal particles are only meaningful in the lower temperature range (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>b), as for the warmer temperature range the ice crystals are too large to compute the light scattering properties with the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.61"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e4556">Linear depolarisation ratio as a function of geometric mean diameter (GMD). The measurement data (dots) are compared to T-matrix simulations of spheroidal particles at 178° near-backscattering direction (lines) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.62"/> and to CGOM simulations of columns with hollow basal facets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.63"/>. The experimental data at initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in <bold>(a)</bold> and between<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <bold>(b)</bold>. <bold>(c)</bold> shows the schematics of the used column shape with hollow basal facets entering 33.3 % of the column height from each prism facet. The shaded areas mark the uncertainty in size conversion between the measurement data and the simulations. There is a good overlap between the measurement data and the simulations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4633">The CGOM simulations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> use hollow columns where each basal facet is hollowed to a depth of 33.3 % of the length of the column. The schematics are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>c. This type and length of hollowness is consistent with the ice crystal replicas that were found on the microscope images of the formvar slides (e.g. see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a) and with the hollowness parametrisation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.64"/>. The consideration of hollowness lowers the linear depolarisation ratios to the range of the measurement data, likely due to the presence of additional planar surfaces inside the crystal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.65"/>. Using a mean free path around 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the higher cirrus temperature range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be reproduced. Using a mean free path of about 4000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the CGOM simulations reproduce the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the lower cirrus temperature range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The implementation of ice crystal complexity with hollowness, surface roughness and internal scatterers in the CGOM ray tracing methods allows to reproduce the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. CGOM simulations of solid columns overestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>, where ice crystal complexity is varied with distortion parameters from 0 (pristine) to 0.5 (highly complex).  The CGOM simulation results are almost identical for aspect ratios of 1.75 and 2.0, and for the wavelength of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">552</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was used during the RICE03 campaign (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS3"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS4"/>). CGOM simulations of hollow columns using mean free path from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating negligible internal scattering, to 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating high internal scattering are shown in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4808">CGOM simulations use the geometric optics approximation and therefore only yield reliable results for size parameters larger than about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Recent numerically exact T-matrix simulations have the capability to fill the size range between the smallest particle sizes and ray tracing simulations in the geometric optics approximation for complex shaped hexagonal particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.66"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/> shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from IITM simulations with aspect ratios between 1.0 and 2.0. There is a sharp increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing particle size from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sizes</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at particle sizes around 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For particle sizes larger than about 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches a plateau with smaller variation with size. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the plateau increases with increasing surface roughness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The simulations with aspect ratios of 1.5 and 2.0 show slightly higher results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in comparison to simulations with an aspect ratio of 1.0. While the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower than the CGOM simulations of solid hexagonal particles (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>), it overlaps with the CGOM simulations of hollow columns at low mean free paths (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2"/>). Yet, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the IITM simulations still generally overestimates the measurement data. Only for the pristine case (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with aspect ratio 1.0, the simulations partly overlap with the measurement data. However, based on the microphysical data at least some degree of complexity on the ice crystal replica images and the optical small-scale complexity parameter is expected.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e4977">Comparison between the measured linear depolarisation ratio as a function of geometric mean diameter (GMD) (dots) and Invariant Imbedded T-Matrix (IITM) simulations of hexagonal particles at 178° near-backscattering direction (lines). Surface roughness variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0 and 0.5 are used. The results for an aspect ratio of 1.0 are shown in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>, for an aspect ratio of 1.5 in <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>, and for an aspect ratio of 2.0 in <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>. The experimental data at initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is added in <bold>(a, c, e)</bold>, and between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> for comparison. The shaded areas mark the uncertainty in size conversion between the measurement data and the simulations. The IITM simulations without internal crystal complexity overestimate the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for most sizes.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5082">Similarities and differences in the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with particle size from the IITM simulations are found in comparison to the T-matrix simulations. The sharp increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the smallest particle sizes in the IITM simulations is also seen in the T-matrix simulations. However, the peak of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the T-matrix simulations is at a lower size of about 2 µm in comparison to the IITM simulations. Furthermore, the subsequent plateau of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is observed in both simulations, but at lower sizes and for lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the T-matrix simulations in comparison to the IITM simulations. Further refining the ice crystal complexity model of the IITM simulations, for example, by incorporating hollowness, could enhance its agreement with the measurement data.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e5129">In this section, the measurement results are compared to previous studies on the linear depolarisation ratio of cloud chamber grown and atmospheric cirrus clouds. Furthermore, the limitations of the numerical simulations are discussed.</p>
      <p id="d2e5132"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.67"/> observed a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for cirrus with a mid-latitude ground-based lidar at a wavelength of 694 nm located at the facility for atmospheric remote sensing of the University of Utah. CALIPSO space-borne lidar measurements at 532 nm have given similar results for daytime measurements of cirrus with a global mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the nighttime global average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is closer to our cloud chamber findings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.68"/>. Yet, the authors explain the lower nighttime values as an artefact caused by background signals from Rayleigh scattering of the atmosphere. Most other lidar studies of mid-latitude cirrus reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the range between approximately 0.2 and 0.5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.69"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.  Polar cirrus are shown to have a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0.1 and 0.3 compared to mid-latitude cirrus at the same temperature from ground-based lidar observations with a wavelength of 532 nm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.70"/> as well as from CALIPSO space-borne lidar measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.71"/>. The cloud chamber grown ice particles that we observed in this study have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0.08 and 0.3 at GMD below 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is in good agreement with polar studies. One potential explanation for lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in polar observations is the common occurrence of diamond dust and ice fog particles at sizes smaller than 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in high latitudes, which rarely exist in mid-latitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.72"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5249">Our laboratory results are restricted to relatively small ice crystals, whereas atmospheric ice crystals in cirrus regularly reach sizes larger than 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially at higher cirrus temperatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.73"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.74"/> investigated the linear depolarisation ratio of case studies of different cirrus between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the CIRRUS in Mid-Latitudes (CIRRUS-ML) campaign. In the four investigated case studies, the linear depolarisation ratio also increases with increasing particle size from a median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.39 for the cloud with the smallest medium effective diameter of 52.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to a median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.52 for the cirrus with the largest medium effective diameter of 193.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> observed during CIRRUS-ML measured at the direct backscattering direction largely exceeded the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> observed at the AIDA cloud chamber at the near backscattering direction of 178°. The findings indicate that more comprehensive optical models are necessary to accurately reproduce the observed linear depolarisation ratios of morphologically complex ice crystals.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e5346">Difference between the linear depolarisation ratio at the exact backscattering direction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and at 178° (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">178</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for T-matrix simulations <bold>(a)</bold>, CGOM simulations of solid columns with a distortion of 0.3 and a mean free path of 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>, CGOM simulations of hollow columns with a distortion of 0.3 and a mean free path of 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold> and IITM simulations with roughness variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0 and 0.5 and an aspect ratio of one <bold>(d)</bold>. IITM simulations show the highest possible bias up to 0.17 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GMD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e5445">Small ice crystals with sizes below 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are known to cause high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.75"/>. The cloud chamber grown ice clouds with GMD below 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that we observed in this study showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of up to 0.45. This can explain the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in lower cirrus temperatures in the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.76"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> by the presence of small ice crystals with spherical equivalent diameters below 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In situ observations of small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>maximum dimension</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ice crystals have been made in tropical tropopause cirrus at temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.77"/>. This can be a driver of higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> observed for cirrus at lower latitudes where deep convective systems occur with higher frequencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.78"/>. Small ice particles in this size range also occur in contrails <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.79"/>, influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved by lidar measurements.</p>
      <p id="d2e5576">Laboratory studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.80"/> investigated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of artificially grown ice crystals at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with similar maximum dimensions between 20 and 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a wavelength of 532 nm. The ice crystals were grown in a fall tube and contained a higher fraction of plate-like particles according to the replica photographs. For the columnar particles hollowness on the basal facets and air inclusions were visible on the replica images, similar to our observations. The ice crystals were found to have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measured at 180° backscattering direction between 0.25 and 0.45 and at 178° near-backscattering direction between 0.1 and 0.35, which is comparable to our measurements. This raises the question of how much lower our observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 178° (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">178</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is in reference to exact backscattering <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 180° (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.81"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5668">The simulated difference between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">178</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a for T-matrix simulations, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>b for CGOM simulations of solid columns, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>c for CGOM simulations of hollow columns and in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>d for IITM simulations. For T-matrix and CGOM simulations the largest difference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">178</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is below 0.04, and thus cannot explain the difference between our cloud chamber observations and atmospheric values.  Only the IITM simulations show a clear bias towards lower depolarisation ratios for the 178° measurements compared to measurements at the exact backscattering direction for roughened crystals (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>d).  This bias increases with increasing particle sizes, and for roughened crystals a maximum bias of 0.17 for a GMD of 13.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is found. Therefore, it cannot be entirely ruled out that the slightly lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed in AIDA, compared to atmospheric lidar, are due to the deviation from exact backscattering. However, this offset does not affect the comparison with numerical models, which are also evaluated at the near-backscattering angle of 178°.</p>
      <p id="d2e5751">The results suggest that more comprehensive optical models are required to reproduce the observed depolarisation ratios of complex ice crystals. While the IITM simulations, which included only surface roughness on solid columns, showed poor agreement with measurements, the CGOM model achieved better correspondence only when multiple scales and types of complexity – such as hollowness and internal scatterers – were incorporated. Although the applicability of the CGOM simulations to correctly model polarimetric properties has been questioned, because changes in polarisation caused by internal scattering are omitted in the simulations, and interference effects from different rays leaving the particle are excluded <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.82"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, it was still possible to reproduce observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values when a suitable combination of complexity parameters was applied. This supports our conclusion that capturing the full range of morphological complexity is critical for accurate optical modelling. However, commonly used approaches like the tilted facet method remain limited, as they lack physical surfaces and are difficult to relate to real, observed ice crystal features <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.83"/>. Since many complexity features occur at scales comparable to the wavelength of light, their representation within geometric optics frameworks remains questionable. Together, these findings highlight the need for more physically realistic models that include both surface and internal complexity or even more complex shapes to accurately simulate polarimetric scattering properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary</title>
      <p id="d2e5778">In this study, we analysed the relationship between the linear depolarisation ratio and the simultaneously measured microphysical properties of laboratory-generated ice crystals, specifically size, shape and optical complexity. The ice crystals were grown under controlled cirrus conditions with sizes predominantly below 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The analysis of the microphysical properties of 47 ice clouds grown in the AIDA cloud chamber shows that smaller and more pristine ice crystals tend to form at lower cirrus temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while larger and more complex crystals are more common at higher cirrus temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to formvar replica photographs, the fraction of hexagonal columnar particles increases with decreasing temperature from 19 % at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 41 % at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A significant fraction of columns exhibited hollowness on the basal facets, with 46 % and 40 % at initial gas temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e5902">We found that particles with GMD larger than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have a linear depolarisation ratio below 0.3. This is lower than atmospheric lidar measurements in mid-latitude cirrus but agrees well with lidar measurements in polar regions. Two temperature-dependent modes are found. For cloud chamber temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lower, in most cases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stays constant for increasing size. For cloud chamber temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with increasing size up to about 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in both temperature ranges can be well reproduced with CGOM simulations of hollow columnar ice crystals using the tilted facet method and mean free paths for internal scattering to model ice crystal complexity. For ice crystals with GMD below 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the strong increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> up to values of 0.45 with decreasing size is in good agreement with T-matrix simulations assuming spheroidal shapes. Recent IITM simulations for small and roughened hexagonal ice crystals were tested against our observations, but the comparison showed that the IITM simulations overestimate the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by about 15 %. Adapting the model of ice crystal complexity further, for instance by including hollowness, may improve agreement with the measurement data.</p>
      <p id="d2e6013">We also investigated the link between the small-scale morphological complexity, measured using the optical complexity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but no clear correlation was found. One reason can be that other morphological features, that are not constant during the experiments (like the particle shape), affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is also possible that, even at the lowest supersaturation levels generated in the cloud chamber, ice crystals already have a baseline roughness, potentially limiting the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> so that a correlation cannot be observed with the current laboratory setup.</p>
      <p id="d2e6052">Understanding how size and morphological complexity influence the ice cloud backscattering linear depolarisation ratio is essential for interpreting atmospheric remote sensing data from instruments such as the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) of the CALIPSO mission, the Cloud-Aerosol Transportation System (CATS) lidar on the International Space Station (ISS) or the Atmospheric Lidar (ATLID) on the new Earth Cloud, Aerosol and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) satellite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.84"/>. Additionally, our measurements of the optical properties of small ice crystals can be useful for testing and validating optical particle models at the limit of the geometric optics approximation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Relation between spherical equivalent diameter and particle maximum dimension</title>
      <p id="d2e6069">Due to different light scattering properties in the direction of the trigger field of view of the PPD-2K, the relationship between the ice particle spherical equivalent mean diameter and the maximum dimension is influenced by the ice particle shape and complexity. The fraction of light scattered by water droplets of different sizes over the trigger optics solid angle is calculated with Mie theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.85"/>. It is compared to the intensity of light scattered in the direction of the trigger field of view by ice crystals based on light scattering properties from a database by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.86"/>. We estimate a spherical equivalent diameter of 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be equivalent to a maximum dimension between 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a rough hollow column and up to 69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a smooth plate. The maximum dimensions of ice crystals of different habits and water droplets are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA1"/>a for rough particles and in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA1"/>b for smooth particles. The conversion factor ranges between 1.0 and 2.5. It can be noted that the spread in size conversion between the different habits is larger for smooth particles than for rough ones. Increasing particle roughness smooths out the characteristic scattering features of the particle habits, such as the 22° halo. Thus, the habit of pristine particles has a stronger effect on the size conversion than that of complex particles.</p><fig id="FA1"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e6115">Ice crystal maximum dimensions of different habits are shown as a function of their spherical equivalent diameter for rough ice particles <bold>(a)</bold> and smooth ice particles <bold>(b)</bold>. The spherical equivalent diameter is estimated by integrating the light that is scattered by an ice crystal in the direction of the solid angle of the PPD-2K trigger field of view, based on a light scattering database by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.87"/> and Mie theory for droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.88"/>. The maximum particle size can be up to 2.5 times the spherical equivalent diameter for rough plates.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Additional numerical simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e6146">This section provides additional numerical simulations of the linear depolarisation ratio. T-matrix simulations of spheroids and CGOM simulations of solid and hollow hexagonal ice crystals are presented for multiple aspect ratios and for the wavelength of 552 nm that was used in the SIMONE-Junior instrument.</p>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>B1</label><title>CGOM simulations of solid columns</title>
      <p id="d2e6156">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/> shows the measurement data with CGOM simulations of solid columnar ice crystals with a fixed aspect ratio of 1.5. The simulations of solid columns always overestimate our observations, independent of varying surface roughness or mean free path. An increase in the distortion parameter up to about 0.3 leads to a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all investigated sizes. Beyond this point, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases again with increasing distortion for all investigated sizes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>B2</label><title>Effect of mean free path on CGOM simulations of hollow hexagonal particles</title>
      <p id="d2e6183">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB2"/>a and b show CGOM simulations of hexagonal ice particles with hollow basal facets using mean free paths between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (label A), indicating negligible internal scattering, and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (label E), indicating high internal scattering. A mean free path around 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C) reproduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the higher cirrus temperature range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using a mean free path of about 4000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (B), the CGOM simulations reproduce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the lower cirrus temperature range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A decrease in mean free path increases the linear depolarisation ratio.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>B3</label><title>Effect of aspect ratio in CGOM simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e6312">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB3"/>a and b show that changes of the aspect ratio between 1.5 and 2.0 only have a minor effect on the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the CGOM simulations of solid and hollow columns. This is the range of aspect ratios for columns seen on the microscope images of the formvar replica sampling at the AIDA cloud chamber. A distortion parameter of 0.3 and different mean free paths are used. The difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is largest with 2.5 % between an aspect ratio of 1.5 and 2.0 for hollow columns.  In addition, T-matrix simulations of spheroids with aspect ratios between 1.5 and 2.0 are shown. Here, the aspect ratio has a larger effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with differences of up to 20 % between aspect ratios of 1.5 and 2.0. Nonetheless, all three aspect ratios reproduce the size-dependence of the measurement data well in the size range of about 2–9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>B4</label><title>Effect of SIMONE-Junior wavelength of 552 nm</title>
      <p id="d2e6358">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB4"/>a and b show the simulated linear depolarisation ratio for solid and hollow columns at the different wavelengths of 448 and 552 nm, which are used in the SIMONE and SIMONE-Junior instruments, respectively. The wavelength of 552 nm used in SIMONE-Junior during the RICE03 measurement campaign only causes minor changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a maximum deviation of 1.5 % in comparison to the wavelength of 488 nm that is used by the SIMONE instrument in all other measurement campaigns.</p>

      <fig id="FB1"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d2e6372">Linear depolarisation ratio from CGOM simulations at 178° near-backscattering direction as a function of geometric mean diameter (GMD) for solid columns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.89"/>. The aspect ratio (AR) is fixed at 1.5 and the distortion is varied between 0 and 0.5. The simulations in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> use a mean free path of 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold> and of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for high and negligible internal scattering, respectively <bold>(d)</bold>. For comparison, <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> include all measurements with initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as gray dots. The shaded areas mark the uncertainty in size conversion between the measurement data and the simulations. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> simulated for solid columns overestimates the measurement data.</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

<fig id="FB2"><label>Figure B2</label><caption><p id="d2e6502">Linear depolarisation ratio as a function of geometric mean diameter (GMD). The measurement data (dots) are compared CGOM simulations of columns with hollow basal facets (entering 33.3 % of the column height from each basal facet) using mean free paths between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (label A) and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (label E) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.90"/>. The experimental data at initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in <bold>(a)</bold> and between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <bold>(b)</bold>. The shaded areas mark the uncertainty in size conversion between the measurement data and the simulations.</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="FB3"><label>Figure B3</label><caption><p id="d2e6604">Linear depolarisation ratio as a function of geometric mean diameter (GMD). The measurement data (dots) are compared to T-matrix simulations of spheroidal particles at 178° near-backscattering direction (lines) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.91"/> and to CGOM simulations of columns with a distortion of 0.3. The aspect ratio (AR) is varied between 1.5 and 2.0. Mean free paths of 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (high internal scattering) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (negligible internal scattering) are used for solid columns (see A and B), and a mean free path of 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used for solid columns (see C). For comparison <bold>(a)</bold> includes all measurements with initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as gray dots. The shaded areas mark the uncertainty in size conversion between the measurement data and the simulations. Changes in aspect ratio in the observed range between 1.5 and 2.0 only cause minor changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

<fig id="FB4"><label>Figure B4</label><caption><p id="d2e6729">Linear depolarisation ratio from CGOM simulations at 178° near-backscattering direction as a function of geometric mean diameter (GMD) for solid and hollow columns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.92"/> and for wavelengths of 488 and 552 nm, as they are used by the SIMONE and SIMONE-Junior instruments, respectively. The aspect ratio (AR) is fixed at 1.5 and the distortion is fixed at 0.3. Mean free paths of 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (high internal scattering) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (negligible internal scattering) are used for solid columns (see C and B) and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for hollow columns (see A). For comparison <bold>(a)</bold> includes all measurements with initial gas temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as gray dots. The shaded areas mark the uncertainty in size conversion between the measurement data and the simulations. Small changes in the used wavelength of the two instruments only cause minor changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> according to the CGOM simulations.</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="FB5"><label>Figure B5</label><caption><p id="d2e6848">Histogram of the 10 s averaged linear depolarisation ratio measured during 12 supercooled liquid droplet cloud experiments in the AIDA cloud chamber during the RICE03 campaign at an initial gas temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The observed mean linear depolarisation ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>droplet</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is well within the expected range taking the measurement uncertainty of 2.1 % from the calibration target measurements into consideration.</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/1277/2026/acp-26-1277-2026-f17.png"/>

        </fig>


</sec>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title>Validation of linear depolarisation by observation of liquid droplets</title>
      <p id="d2e6919">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB5"/> shows a histogram of the 10 s averaged linear depolarisation ratio measured during 12 supercooled liquid droplet cloud experiments in the AIDA cloud chamber during the RICE03 campaign at an initial gas temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The linear depolarisation ratio of liquid and thus spherical droplets vanishes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.93"/>. The observed mean linear depolarisation ratio of the liquid clouds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>droplet</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thus supports the measurement uncertainty of 2.1 % derived from the calibration target measurements.</p>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6980">All measurement data are available on RADAR4KIT: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.35097/66tc7z2u0s2gf1fe" ext-link-type="DOI">10.35097/66tc7z2u0s2gf1fe</ext-link> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="altparen.94"/>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e6992">EJ and AH conceptualised the manuscript. MSc developed the SIMONE instrument. MSc planned and led the AIDA cloud chamber experiments. MSa provided the IITM simulations. RW operated and analysed the data of the FTIR. AH analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. All have read and commented on the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e6998">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e7004">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e7010">The authors are grateful to the AIDA staff for their support during the cloud chamber experiments.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e7015">This research has been supported by the Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft (grant-no.: VH-NG-1531). The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e7021">This paper was edited by Silke Gross and reviewed by Darrel Baumgardner and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Bailey and Hallett(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Bailey, M. P. and Hallett, J.: A comprehensive habit diagram for atmospheric ice crystals: Confirmation from the laboratory, AIRS II, and other field studies, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2888–2899, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jas2883.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009jas2883.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Baker(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Baker, I.: Imaging dislocations in ice, Microsc. Res. Techniq., 62, 70–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10382" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jemt.10382</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Cotton et al.(2010)Cotton, Osborne, Ulanowski, Hirst, Kaye, and Greenaway</label><mixed-citation>Cotton, R., Osborne, S., Ulanowski, Z., Hirst, E., Kaye, P. H., and Greenaway, R.: The ability of the Small Ice Detector (SID-2) to characterize cloud particle and aerosol morphologies obtained during flights of the FAAM BAe-146 research aircraft, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27, 290–303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jtecha1282.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009jtecha1282.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>De La Torre Castro et al.(2023)De La Torre Castro, Jurkat-Witschas, Afchine, Grewe, Hahn, Kirschler, Krämer, Lucke, Spelten, Wernli et al.</label><mixed-citation>De La Torre Castro, E., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Afchine, A., Grewe, V., Hahn, V., Kirschler, S., Krämer, M., Lucke, J., Spelten, N., Wernli, H., Zöger, M., and Voigt, C.: Differences in microphysical properties of cirrus at high and mid-latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13167–13189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13167-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-13167-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Del Guasta(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Del Guasta, M.: Simulation of LIDAR returns from pristine and deformed hexagonal ice prisms in cold cirrus by means of “face tracing”, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 12589–12602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900724" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000jd900724</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Del Guasta and Vallar(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Del Guasta, M. and Vallar, E.: In-cloud variability of LIDAR depolarization of polar and midlatitude cirrus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl017163" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003gl017163</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Donovan et al.(2024)Donovan, van Zadelhoff, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Donovan, D. P., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., and Wang, P.: The EarthCARE lidar cloud and aerosol profile processor (A-PRO): the A-AER, A-EBD, A-TC, and A-ICE products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5301–5340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5301-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-5301-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Ebert et al.(2005)Ebert, Teichert, Giesemann, Saathoff, Schurath et al.</label><mixed-citation>Ebert, V., Teichert, H., Giesemann, C., Saathoff, H., and Schurath, U.: Fibre-coupled in-situ laser absorption spectrometer for the selective detection of water vapour traces down to the ppb-level; Fasergekoppeltes In-situ-Laserspektrometer fuer den selektiven Nachweis von Wasserdampfspuren bis in den ppb-Bereich, Technisches Messen (TM), 72, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1524/teme.72.1.23.56689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1524/teme.72.1.23.56689</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Feingold and Levin(1986)</label><mixed-citation>Feingold, G. and Levin, Z.: The lognormal fit to raindrop spectra from frontal convective clouds in Israel, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 1346–1363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025&lt;1346:tlftrs&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025&lt;1346:tlftrs&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Futyan and Del Genio(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Futyan, J. M. and Del Genio, A. D.: Deep convective system evolution over Africa and the tropical Atlantic, J. Climate, 20, 5041–5060, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli4297.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli4297.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Gil-Díaz et al.(2024)Gil-Díaz, Sicard, Comerón, dos Santos Oliveira, Muñoz-Porcar, Rodríguez-Gómez, Lewis, Welton, and Lolli</label><mixed-citation>Gil-Díaz, C., Sicard, M., Comerón, A., dos Santos Oliveira, D. C. F., Muñoz-Porcar, C., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., Lewis, J. R., Welton, E. J., and Lolli, S.: Geometrical and optical properties of cirrus clouds in Barcelona, Spain: analysis with the two-way transmittance method of 4 years of lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1197–1216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1197-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-1197-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Groß et al.(2023)Groß, Jurkat-Witschas, Li, Wirth, Urbanek, Krämer, Weigel, and Voigt</label><mixed-citation>Groß, S., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Li, Q., Wirth, M., Urbanek, B., Krämer, M., Weigel, R., and Voigt, C.: Investigating an indirect aviation effect on mid-latitude cirrus clouds – linking lidar-derived optical properties to in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8369–8381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8369-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-8369-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Gultepe et al.(2017)Gultepe, Heymsfield, Gallagher, Ickes, and Baumgardner</label><mixed-citation>Gultepe, I., Heymsfield, A. J., Gallagher, M., Ickes, L., and Baumgardner, D.: Ice fog: The current state of knowledge and future challenges, Meteorological Monographs, 58, 4–1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0002.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0002.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Hamel et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Hamel, A., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., and Järvinen, E.:, Linear Depolarisation Ratio of Cloud Chamber Grown Cirrus, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.35097/66tc7z2u0s2gf1fe" ext-link-type="DOI">10.35097/66tc7z2u0s2gf1fe</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Harrington and Pokrifka(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Harrington, J. Y. and Pokrifka, G. F.: An Approximate Criterion for Morphological Transformations in Small Vapor Grown Ice Crystals, J. Atmos. Sci., 81, 401–416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-23-0131.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-23-0131.1</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Järvinen(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Järvinen, E.: Investigations of Angular Light Scattering by Complex Atmospheric Particles, KIT Scientific Publishing, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000056601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5445/KSP/1000056601</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Järvinen et al.(2023)Järvinen, van Diedenhoven, Magee, Neshyba, Schnaiter, Xu, Jourdan, Delene, Waitz, Lolli et al.</label><mixed-citation>Järvinen, E., van Diedenhoven, B., Magee, N., Neshyba, S., Schnaiter, M., Xu, G., Jourdan, O., Delene, D., Waitz, F., Lolli, S., and Kato, S.: Ice Crystal Complexity and Link to the Cirrus Cloud Radiative Effect, Clouds and their Climatic Impacts: Radiation, Circulation, and Precipitation, 47–85, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119700357.ch3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9781119700357.ch3</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Kaye et al.(2008)Kaye, Hirst, Greenaway, Ulanowski, Hesse, DeMott, Saunders, and Connolly</label><mixed-citation>Kaye, P. H., Hirst, E., Greenaway, R. S., Ulanowski, Z., Hesse, E., DeMott, P. J., Saunders, C., and Connolly, P.: Classifying atmospheric ice crystals by spatial light scattering, Optics Letters, 33, 1545–1547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.33.001545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ol.33.001545</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Kim et al.(2014)Kim, Kim, Kim, and Yoon</label><mixed-citation>Kim, Y., Kim, S.-W., Kim, M.-H., and Yoon, S.-C.: Geometric and optical properties of cirrus clouds inferred from three-year ground-based lidar and CALIOP measurements over Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Res., 139, 27–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.12.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.12.016</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Kustova et al.(2022)Kustova, Konoshonkin, Shishko, Timofeev, Tkachev, Wang, and Borovoi</label><mixed-citation>Kustova, N., Konoshonkin, A., Shishko, V., Timofeev, D., Tkachev, I., Wang, Z., and Borovoi, A.: Depolarization Ratio for Randomly Oriented Ice Crystals of Cirrus Clouds, Atmosphere, 13, 1551, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos13101551</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Lawson et al.(2019)Lawson, Woods, Jensen, Erfani, Gurganus, Gallagher, Connolly, Whiteway, Baran, May et al.</label><mixed-citation>Lawson, R., Woods, S., Jensen, E., Erfani, E., Gurganus, C., Gallagher, M., Connolly, P., Whiteway, J., Baran, A., May, P., Heymsfield, A., Schmitt, C. G., McFarquhar, G., Um, J., Protat, A., Bailey, M., Lance, S., Muehlbauer, A., Stith, J., Korolev, A., Toon, O. B., and Krämer, M.: A review of ice particle shapes in cirrus formed in situ and in anvils, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 10049–10090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd030122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018jd030122</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Leinonen(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Leinonen, J.: High-level interface to T-matrix scattering calculations: architecture, capabilities and limitations, Optics Express, 22, 1655–1660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.22.001655" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/oe.22.001655</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Li and Groß(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Li, Q. and Groß, S.: Changes in cirrus cloud properties and occurrence over Europe during the COVID-19-caused air traffic reduction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14573–14590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14573-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-14573-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Li and Groß(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Li, Q. and Groß, S.: Lidar observations of cirrus cloud properties with CALIPSO from midlatitudes towards high-latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 16657–16677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16657-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-16657-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Liou and Lahore(1974)</label><mixed-citation>Liou, K.-N. and Lahore, H.: Laser sensing of cloud composition: a backscattered depolarization technique, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 13, 257–263, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1974)013&lt;0257:lsocca&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1974)013&lt;0257:lsocca&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Liu et al.(2013)Liu, Panetta, and Yang</label><mixed-citation>Liu, C., Panetta, R. L., and Yang, P.: The effects of surface roughness on the scattering properties of hexagonal columns with sizes from the Rayleigh to the geometric optics regimes, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 129, 169–185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.06.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.06.011</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Liu et al.(2014)Liu, Yang, Minnis, Loeb, Kato, Heymsfield, and Schmitt</label><mixed-citation>Liu, C., Yang, P., Minnis, P., Loeb, N., Kato, S., Heymsfield, A., and Schmitt, C.: A two-habit model for the microphysical and optical properties of ice clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13719–13737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13719-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13719-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Macke(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Macke, A.: rt-mc, Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3965572" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3965572</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Macke et al.(1995)Macke, Mishchenko, Muinonen, and Carlson</label><mixed-citation>Macke, A., Mishchenko, M. I., Muinonen, K., and Carlson, B. E.: Scattering of light by large nonspherical particles: ray-tracing approximation versus T-matrix method, Optics Letters, 20, 1934–1936, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.20.001934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ol.20.001934</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Macke et al.(1996a)Macke, Mishchenko, and Cairns</label><mixed-citation>Macke, A., Mishchenko, M. I., and Cairns, B.: The influence of inclusions on light scattering by large ice particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 23311–23316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd02364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96jd02364</ext-link>, 1996a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Macke et al.(1996b)Macke, Mueller, and Raschke</label><mixed-citation>Macke, A., Mueller, J., and Raschke, E.: Single scattering properties of atmospheric ice crystals, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 2813–2825, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053&lt;2813:sspoai&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053&lt;2813:sspoai&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1996b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Manoj Kumar and Venkatramanan(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Manoj Kumar, N. and Venkatramanan, K.: Lidar observed optical properties of tropical Cirrus clouds over Gadanki region, Frontiers in Earth Science, 8, 140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00140" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2020.00140</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Mishchenko and Hovenier(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Mishchenko, M. and Hovenier, J.: Depolarization of light backscattered by randomly oriented nonspherical particles, Optics Letters, 20, 1356–1358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.20.001356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ol.20.001356</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Mishchenko and Travis(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Mishchenko, M. I. and Travis, L. D.: Capabilities and limitations of a current FORTRAN implementation of the T-matrix method for randomly oriented, rotationally symmetric scatterers, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 60, 309–324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4073(98)00008-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0022-4073(98)00008-9</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Mishchenko et al.(2000)Mishchenko, Hovenier, and Travis</label><mixed-citation> Mishchenko, M. I., Hovenier, J. W., and Travis, L. D.: Light scattering by nonspherical particles: theory, measurements, and applications, Academic Press, San Diego, 147–172, ISBN 0-12-498660-9, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Mitchell et al.(2011)Mitchell, Lawson, and Baker</label><mixed-citation>Mitchell, D. L., Lawson, R. P., and Baker, B.: Understanding effective diameter and its application to terrestrial radiation in ice clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3417–3429, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3417-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3417-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Möhler et al.(2005)Möhler, Büttner, Linke, Schnaiter, Saathoff, Stetzer, Wagner, Krämer, Mangold, Ebert et al.</label><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., Büttner, S., Linke, C., Schnaiter, M., Saathoff, H., Stetzer, O., Wagner, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., Ebert, V., and Schurath, U.: Effect of sulfuric acid coating on heterogeneous ice nucleation by soot aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005169</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Nicolae et al.(2018)Nicolae, Vasilescu, Talianu, Binietoglou, Nicolae, Andrei, and Antonescu</label><mixed-citation>Nicolae, D., Vasilescu, J., Talianu, C., Binietoglou, I., Nicolae, V., Andrei, S., and Antonescu, B.: A neural network aerosol-typing algorithm based on lidar data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14511–14537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14511-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14511-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Noel et al.(2002)Noel, Chepfer, Ledanois, Delaval, and Flamant</label><mixed-citation>Noel, V., Chepfer, H., Ledanois, G., Delaval, A., and Flamant, P. H.: Classification of particle effective shape ratios in cirrus clouds based on the lidar depolarization ratio, Appl. Optics, 41, 4245–4257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.41.004245" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.41.004245</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Pauly et al.(2019)Pauly, Yorks, Hlavka, McGill, Amiridis, Palm, Rodier, Vaughan, Selmer, Kupchock et al.</label><mixed-citation>Pauly, R. M., Yorks, J. E., Hlavka, D. L., McGill, M. J., Amiridis, V., Palm, S. P., Rodier, S. D., Vaughan, M. A., Selmer, P. A., Kupchock, A. W., Baars, H., and Gialitaki, A.: Cloud-Aerosol Transport System (CATS) 1064 nm calibration and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6241–6258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6241-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-6241-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Prahl(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Prahl, S.: miepython: Pure python calculation of Mie scattering, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11135148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.11135148</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Saito and Yang(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Saito, M. and Yang, P.: Quantifying the Impact of the Surface Roughness of Hexagonal Ice Crystals on Backscattering Properties for Lidar-Based Remote Sensing Applications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL104175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl104175" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023gl104175</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Saito et al.(2021)Saito, Yang, Ding, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>Saito, M., Yang, P., Ding, J., and Liu, X.: A comprehensive database of the optical properties of irregular aerosol particles for radiative transfer simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 2089–2111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-20-0338.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jas-d-20-0338.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Sassen(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Sassen, K.: The polarization lidar technique for cloud research: A review and current assessment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 72, 1848–1866, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1991)072&lt;1848:tpltfc&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1991)072&lt;1848:tpltfc&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Sassen and Benson(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Sassen, K. and Benson, S.: A midlatitude cirrus cloud climatology from the Facility for Atmospheric Remote Sensing. Part II: Microphysical properties derived from lidar depolarization, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2103–2112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058&lt;2103:amcccf&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058&lt;2103:amcccf&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Sassen and Zhu(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Sassen, K. and Zhu, J.: A global survey of CALIPSO linear depolarization ratios in ice clouds: Initial findings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd012279</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Sassen et al.(2012)Sassen, Kayetha, and Zhu</label><mixed-citation>Sassen, K., Kayetha, V. K., and Zhu, J.: Ice cloud depolarization for nadir and off-nadir CALIPSO measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl053116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012gl053116</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Sato and Okamoto(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Sato, K. and Okamoto, H.: Global analysis of height-resolved ice particle categories from spaceborne lidar, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl105522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023gl105522</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Schmitt and Heymsfield(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Schmitt, C. and Heymsfield, A.: On the occurrence of hollow bullet rosette–and column-shaped ice crystals in midlatitude cirrus, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 4514–4519, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jas2317.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007jas2317.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Schnaiter et al.(2012)Schnaiter, Büttner, Möhler, Skrotzki, Vragel, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Schnaiter, M., Büttner, S., Möhler, O., Skrotzki, J., Vragel, M., and Wagner, R.: Influence of particle size and shape on the backscattering linear depolarisation ratio of small ice crystals – cloud chamber measurements in the context of contrail and cirrus microphysics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10465–10484, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10465-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10465-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Schnaiter et al.(2016)Schnaiter, Järvinen, Vochezer, Abdelmonem, Wagner, Jourdan, Mioche, Shcherbakov, Schmitt, Tricoli et al.</label><mixed-citation>Schnaiter, M., Järvinen, E., Vochezer, P., Abdelmonem, A., Wagner, R., Jourdan, O., Mioche, G., Shcherbakov, V. N., Schmitt, C. G., Tricoli, U., Ulanowski, Z., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Cloud chamber experiments on the origin of ice crystal complexity in cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5091–5110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5091-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5091-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Singh et al.(2024)Singh, Sanyal, and Wuebbles</label><mixed-citation>Singh, D. K., Sanyal, S., and Wuebbles, D. J.: Understanding the role of contrails and contrail cirrus in climate change: a global perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9219–9262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9219-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-9219-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Smith et al.(2016)Smith, Connolly, Webb, and Baran</label><mixed-citation>Smith, H. R., Connolly, P. J., Webb, A. R., and Baran, A. J.: Exact and near backscattering measurements of the linear depolarisation ratio of various ice crystal habits generated in a laboratory cloud chamber, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 178, 361–378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.01.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.01.030</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Tian et al.(2010)Tian, Heymsfield, Li, Heymsfield, Bansemer, Twohy, and Srivastava</label><mixed-citation>Tian, L., Heymsfield, G. M., Li, L., Heymsfield, A. J., Bansemer, A., Twohy, C. H., and Srivastava, R. C.: A study of cirrus ice particle size distribution using TC4 observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 195–216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jas3114.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009jas3114.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Ulanowski et al.(2014)Ulanowski, Kaye, Hirst, Greenaway, Cotton, Hesse, and Collier</label><mixed-citation>Ulanowski, Z., Kaye, P. H., Hirst, E., Greenaway, R. S., Cotton, R. J., Hesse, E., and Collier, C. T.: Incidence of rough and irregular atmospheric ice particles from Small Ice Detector 3 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1649–1662, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1649-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1649-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Um et al.(2015)Um, McFarquhar, Hong, Lee, Jung, Lawson, and Mo</label><mixed-citation>Um, J., McFarquhar, G. M., Hong, Y. P., Lee, S.-S., Jung, C. H., Lawson, R. P., and Mo, Q.: Dimensions and aspect ratios of natural ice crystals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3933–3956, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3933-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-3933-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Urbanek et al.(2018)Urbanek, Groß, Wirth, Rolf, Krämer, and Voigt</label><mixed-citation>Urbanek, B., Groß, S., Wirth, M., Rolf, C., Krämer, M., and Voigt, C.: High depolarization ratios of naturally occurring cirrus clouds near air traffic regions over Europe, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl079345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018gl079345</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2010)Veselovskii, Dubovik, Kolgotin, Lapyonok, Di Girolamo, Summa, Whiteman, Mishchenko, and Tanré</label><mixed-citation>Veselovskii, I., Dubovik, O., Kolgotin, A., Lapyonok, T., Di Girolamo, P., Summa, D., Whiteman, D. N., Mishchenko, M., and Tanré, D.: Application of randomly oriented spheroids for retrieval of dust particle parameters from multiwavelength lidar measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014139</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Vochezer et al.(2016)Vochezer, Järvinen, Wagner, Kupiszewski, Leisner, and Schnaiter</label><mixed-citation>Vochezer, P., Järvinen, E., Wagner, R., Kupiszewski, P., Leisner, T., and Schnaiter, M.: In situ characterization of mixed phase clouds using the Small Ice Detector and the Particle Phase Discriminator, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 159–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-159-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-159-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Wagner et al.(2006)Wagner, Benz, Möhler, Saathoff, and Schurath</label><mixed-citation>Wagner, R., Benz, S., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., and Schurath, U.: Probing ice clouds by broadband mid-infrared extinction spectroscopy: case studies from ice nucleation experiments in the AIDA aerosol and cloud chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4775–4800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4775-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4775-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Walden et al.(2003)Walden, Warren, and Tuttle</label><mixed-citation>Walden, V. P., Warren, S. G., and Tuttle, E.: Atmospheric ice crystals over the Antarctic Plateau in winter, J. Appl. Meteorol., 42, 1391–1405, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042&lt;1391:aicota&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042&lt;1391:aicota&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Wang et al.(2008)Wang, Chi, Liu, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Chi, R., Liu, B., and Zhou, J.: Depolarization properties of cirrus clouds from polarization lidar measurements over Hefei in spring, Chinese Optics Letters, 6, 235–237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3788/col20080604.0235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3788/col20080604.0235</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Woods et al.(2018)Woods, Lawson, Jensen, Bui, Thornberry, Rollins, Pfister, and Avery</label><mixed-citation>Woods, S., Lawson, R. P., Jensen, E., Bui, T., Thornberry, T., Rollins, A., Pfister, L., and Avery, M.: Microphysical properties of tropical tropopause layer cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6053–6069, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017jd028068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017jd028068</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Yang et al.(2008)Yang, Zhang, Kattawar, Warren, Baum, Huang, Hu, Winker, and Iaquinta</label><mixed-citation>Yang, P., Zhang, Z., Kattawar, G. W., Warren, S. G., Baum, B. A., Huang, H.-L., Hu, Y. X., Winker, D., and Iaquinta, J.: Effect of cavities on the optical properties of bullet rosettes: Implications for active and passive remote sensing of ice cloud properties, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 2311–2330, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jamc1905.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008jamc1905.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Yang et al.(2013)Yang, Bi, Baum, Liou, Kattawar, Mishchenko, and Cole</label><mixed-citation>Yang, P., Bi, L., Baum, B. A., Liou, K.-N., Kattawar, G. W., Mishchenko, M. I., and Cole, B.: Spectrally consistent scattering, absorption, and polarization properties of atmospheric ice crystals at wavelengths from 0.2 to 100 µm, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 330–347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-12-039.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jas-d-12-039.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Zhu et al.(2023)Zhu, Wang, Konoshonkin, Kustova, Shishko, Timofeev, Tkachev, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, X., Wang, Z., Konoshonkin, A., Kustova, N., Shishko, V., Timofeev, D., Tkachev, I., and Liu, D.: Backscattering properties of randomly oriented hexagonal hollow columns for lidar application, Optics Express, 31, 35257–35271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.502185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/oe.502185</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Cloud Chamber Studies on the Linear Depolarisation Ratio of Small Cirrus Ice Crystals</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Bailey and Hallett(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bailey, M. P. and Hallett, J.: A comprehensive habit
diagram for atmospheric ice crystals: Confirmation from the laboratory, AIRS II, and other field studies,
J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2888–2899, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jas2883.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jas2883.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Baker(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
       Baker, I.: Imaging dislocations in ice, Microsc. Res. Techniq., 62, 70–82,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10382" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10382</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Cotton et al.(2010)Cotton, Osborne, Ulanowski, Hirst, Kaye, and Greenaway</label><mixed-citation>
       Cotton, R.,
Osborne, S., Ulanowski, Z., Hirst, E., Kaye, P. H., and Greenaway, R.: The ability of the Small Ice Detector (SID-2)
to characterize cloud particle and aerosol morphologies obtained during flights of the FAAM BAe-146 research aircraft,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27, 290–303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jtecha1282.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jtecha1282.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>De La Torre Castro et al.(2023)De La Torre Castro, Jurkat-Witschas, Afchine, Grewe, Hahn, Kirschler,
Krämer, Lucke, Spelten, Wernli et al.</label><mixed-citation>
       De La Torre Castro, E., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Afchine,
A., Grewe, V., Hahn, V., Kirschler, S., Krämer, M., Lucke, J., Spelten, N., Wernli, H., Zöger, M., and Voigt,
C.: Differences in microphysical properties of cirrus at high and mid-latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13167–13189,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13167-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13167-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Del Guasta(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
       Del Guasta, M.: Simulation of LIDAR returns from pristine and
deformed hexagonal ice prisms in cold cirrus by means of “face tracing”, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
12589–12602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900724" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900724</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Del Guasta and Vallar(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
       Del Guasta, M. and Vallar, E.: In-cloud variability of LIDAR
depolarization of polar and midlatitude cirrus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl017163" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl017163</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Donovan et al.(2024)Donovan, van Zadelhoff, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
       Donovan, D. P., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., and
Wang, P.: The EarthCARE lidar cloud and aerosol profile processor (A-PRO): the A-AER, A-EBD, A-TC, and A-ICE products,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5301–5340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5301-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5301-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Ebert et al.(2005)Ebert, Teichert, Giesemann, Saathoff, Schurath et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ebert, V., Teichert, H., Giesemann, C., Saathoff, H., and Schurath, U.: Fibre-coupled in-situ
laser absorption spectrometer for the selective detection of water vapour traces down to the ppb-level;
Fasergekoppeltes In-situ-Laserspektrometer fuer den selektiven Nachweis von Wasserdampfspuren bis in den ppb-Bereich,
Technisches Messen (TM), 72, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1524/teme.72.1.23.56689" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1524/teme.72.1.23.56689</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Feingold and Levin(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
       Feingold, G. and Levin, Z.: The lognormal fit to raindrop spectra
from frontal convective clouds in Israel, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 1346–1363,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025&lt;1346:tlftrs&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025&lt;1346:tlftrs&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Futyan and Del Genio(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Futyan, J. M. and Del Genio, A. D.: Deep convective system evolution
over Africa and the tropical Atlantic, J. Climate, 20, 5041–5060, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli4297.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli4297.1</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Gil-Díaz et al.(2024)Gil-Díaz, Sicard, Comerón, dos Santos Oliveira, Muñoz-Porcar,
Rodríguez-Gómez, Lewis, Welton, and Lolli</label><mixed-citation>
       Gil-Díaz, C., Sicard, M., Comerón, A., dos
Santos Oliveira, D. C. F., Muñoz-Porcar, C., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., Lewis, J. R., Welton, E. J., and Lolli,
S.: Geometrical and optical properties of cirrus clouds in Barcelona, Spain: analysis with the two-way transmittance
method of 4 years of lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1197–1216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1197-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1197-2024</a>,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Groß et al.(2023)Groß, Jurkat-Witschas, Li, Wirth, Urbanek, Krämer, Weigel, and
Voigt</label><mixed-citation>
       Groß, S., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Li, Q., Wirth, M., Urbanek, B., Krämer, M.,
Weigel, R., and Voigt, C.: Investigating an indirect aviation effect on mid-latitude cirrus clouds – linking
lidar-derived optical properties to in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8369–8381,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8369-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8369-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Gultepe et al.(2017)Gultepe, Heymsfield, Gallagher, Ickes, and Baumgardner</label><mixed-citation>
       Gultepe, I.,
Heymsfield, A. J., Gallagher, M., Ickes, L., and Baumgardner, D.: Ice fog: The current state of knowledge and future
challenges, Meteorological Monographs, 58, 4–1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0002.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0002.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Hamel et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hamel, A., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., and Järvinen, E.:,
Linear Depolarisation Ratio of Cloud Chamber Grown Cirrus,
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.35097/66tc7z2u0s2gf1fe" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.35097/66tc7z2u0s2gf1fe</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Harrington and Pokrifka(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Harrington, J. Y. and Pokrifka, G. F.: An
Approximate Criterion for Morphological Transformations in Small Vapor Grown Ice Crystals, J. Atmos. Sci., 81,
401–416, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-23-0131.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-23-0131.1</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Järvinen(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Järvinen, E.: Investigations of Angular Light Scattering
by Complex Atmospheric Particles, KIT Scientific Publishing, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000056601" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000056601</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Järvinen et al.(2023)Järvinen, van Diedenhoven, Magee, Neshyba, Schnaiter, Xu, Jourdan, Delene, Waitz,
Lolli et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Järvinen, E., van Diedenhoven, B., Magee, N., Neshyba, S., Schnaiter, M., Xu, G., Jourdan, O., Delene, D., Waitz, F., Lolli, S., and Kato, S.:
Ice Crystal
Complexity and Link to the Cirrus Cloud Radiative Effect, Clouds and their Climatic Impacts: Radiation, Circulation,
and Precipitation, 47–85, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119700357.ch3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119700357.ch3</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Kaye et al.(2008)Kaye, Hirst, Greenaway, Ulanowski, Hesse, DeMott, Saunders, and
Connolly</label><mixed-citation>
       Kaye, P. H., Hirst, E., Greenaway, R. S., Ulanowski, Z., Hesse, E., DeMott, P. J.,
Saunders, C., and Connolly, P.: Classifying atmospheric ice crystals by spatial light scattering, Optics Letters, 33,
1545–1547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.33.001545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.33.001545</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Kim et al.(2014)Kim, Kim, Kim, and Yoon</label><mixed-citation>
       Kim, Y., Kim, S.-W., Kim, M.-H., and Yoon, S.-C.: Geometric
and optical properties of cirrus clouds inferred from three-year ground-based lidar and CALIOP measurements over
Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Res., 139, 27–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.12.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.12.016</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Kustova et al.(2022)Kustova, Konoshonkin, Shishko, Timofeev, Tkachev, Wang, and
Borovoi</label><mixed-citation>
       Kustova, N., Konoshonkin, A., Shishko, V., Timofeev, D., Tkachev, I., Wang, Z.,
and Borovoi, A.: Depolarization Ratio for Randomly Oriented Ice Crystals of Cirrus Clouds, Atmosphere, 13, 1551,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101551</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Lawson et al.(2019)Lawson, Woods, Jensen, Erfani, Gurganus, Gallagher, Connolly, Whiteway, Baran, May
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lawson, R., Woods, S., Jensen, E., Erfani, E., Gurganus, C., Gallagher, M., Connolly, P., Whiteway, J., Baran, A., May, P., Heymsfield, A., Schmitt, C. G., McFarquhar, G., Um, J., Protat, A., Bailey, M., Lance, S., Muehlbauer, A., Stith, J., Korolev, A., Toon, O. B., and Krämer, M.: A review of ice particle shapes
in cirrus formed in situ and in anvils, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 10049–10090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd030122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd030122</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Leinonen(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
       Leinonen, J.: High-level interface to T-matrix scattering
calculations: architecture, capabilities and limitations, Optics Express, 22, 1655–1660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.22.001655" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.22.001655</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Li and Groß(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, Q. and Groß, S.: Changes in cirrus cloud properties and
occurrence over Europe during the COVID-19-caused air traffic reduction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14573–14590,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14573-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14573-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Li and Groß(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, Q. and Groß, S.: Lidar observations of cirrus cloud properties with
CALIPSO from midlatitudes towards high-latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 16657–16677,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16657-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16657-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Liou and Lahore(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
       Liou, K.-N. and Lahore, H.: Laser sensing of cloud composition: a
backscattered depolarization technique, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 13, 257–263,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1974)013&lt;0257:lsocca&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1974)013&lt;0257:lsocca&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Liu et al.(2013)Liu, Panetta, and Yang</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, C., Panetta, R. L., and Yang, P.: The effects of
surface roughness on the scattering properties of hexagonal columns with sizes from the Rayleigh to the geometric
optics regimes, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 129, 169–185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.06.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.06.011</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Liu et al.(2014)Liu, Yang, Minnis, Loeb, Kato, Heymsfield, and Schmitt</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, C., Yang, P., Minnis,
P., Loeb, N., Kato, S., Heymsfield, A., and Schmitt, C.: A two-habit model for the microphysical and optical
properties of ice clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13719–13737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13719-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13719-2014</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Macke(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Macke, A.: rt-mc, Zenodo, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3965572" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3965572</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Macke et al.(1995)Macke, Mishchenko, Muinonen, and Carlson</label><mixed-citation>
       Macke, A.,
Mishchenko, M. I., Muinonen, K., and Carlson, B. E.: Scattering of light by large nonspherical particles: ray-tracing
approximation versus T-matrix method, Optics Letters, 20, 1934–1936, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.20.001934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.20.001934</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Macke et al.(1996a)Macke, Mishchenko, and Cairns</label><mixed-citation>
       Macke, A., Mishchenko, M. I., and
Cairns, B.: The influence of inclusions on light scattering by large ice particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101,
23311–23316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd02364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd02364</a>, 1996a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Macke et al.(1996b)Macke, Mueller, and Raschke</label><mixed-citation>
       Macke, A., Mueller, J., and Raschke, E.:
Single scattering properties of atmospheric ice crystals, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 2813–2825,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053&lt;2813:sspoai&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053&lt;2813:sspoai&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1996b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Manoj Kumar and Venkatramanan(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Manoj Kumar, N. and Venkatramanan, K.: Lidar observed
optical properties of tropical Cirrus clouds over Gadanki region, Frontiers in Earth Science, 8, 140,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00140" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00140</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Mishchenko and Hovenier(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
       Mishchenko, M. and Hovenier, J.: Depolarization
of light backscattered by randomly oriented nonspherical particles, Optics Letters, 20, 1356–1358,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.20.001356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.20.001356</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Mishchenko and Travis(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
       Mishchenko, M. I. and Travis, L. D.: Capabilities
and limitations of a current FORTRAN implementation of the T-matrix method for randomly oriented, rotationally
symmetric scatterers, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 60, 309–324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4073(98)00008-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4073(98)00008-9</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Mishchenko et al.(2000)Mishchenko, Hovenier, and Travis</label><mixed-citation>
       Mishchenko, M. I.,
Hovenier, J. W., and Travis, L. D.: Light scattering by nonspherical particles: theory, measurements, and
applications, Academic Press, San Diego, 147–172, ISBN 0-12-498660-9, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Mitchell et al.(2011)Mitchell, Lawson, and Baker</label><mixed-citation>
       Mitchell, D. L., Lawson, R. P.,
and Baker, B.: Understanding effective diameter and its application to terrestrial radiation in ice clouds,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3417–3429, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3417-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3417-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Möhler et al.(2005)Möhler, Büttner, Linke, Schnaiter, Saathoff, Stetzer, Wagner, Krämer,
Mangold, Ebert et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Möhler, O., Büttner, S., Linke, C., Schnaiter, M., Saathoff, H., Stetzer, O., Wagner, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., Ebert, V., and Schurath, U.:
Effect of sulfuric acid coating on heterogeneous ice nucleation by soot aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005169</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Nicolae et al.(2018)Nicolae, Vasilescu, Talianu, Binietoglou, Nicolae, Andrei, and Antonescu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nicolae, D., Vasilescu, J., Talianu, C., Binietoglou, I., Nicolae, V., Andrei, S., and Antonescu, B.: A neural network
aerosol-typing algorithm based on lidar data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14511–14537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14511-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14511-2018</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Noel et al.(2002)Noel, Chepfer, Ledanois, Delaval, and Flamant</label><mixed-citation>
       Noel, V.,
Chepfer, H., Ledanois, G., Delaval, A., and Flamant, P. H.: Classification of particle effective shape ratios in
cirrus clouds based on the lidar depolarization ratio, Appl. Optics, 41, 4245–4257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.41.004245" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.41.004245</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Pauly et al.(2019)Pauly, Yorks, Hlavka, McGill, Amiridis, Palm, Rodier, Vaughan, Selmer, Kupchock
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
       Pauly, R. M., Yorks, J. E., Hlavka, D. L., McGill, M. J., Amiridis, V., Palm, S. P.,
Rodier, S. D., Vaughan, M. A., Selmer, P. A., Kupchock, A. W., Baars, H., and Gialitaki, A.: Cloud-Aerosol Transport
System (CATS) 1064&thinsp;nm calibration and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6241–6258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6241-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6241-2019</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Prahl(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Prahl, S.: miepython: Pure python calculation of Mie scattering, Zenodo
[code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11135148" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11135148</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Saito and Yang(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Saito, M. and Yang, P.: Quantifying the Impact of the Surface
Roughness of Hexagonal Ice Crystals on Backscattering Properties for Lidar-Based Remote Sensing Applications,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL104175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl104175" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl104175</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Saito et al.(2021)Saito, Yang, Ding, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
       Saito, M., Yang, P., Ding, J., and Liu, X.: A
comprehensive database of the optical properties of irregular aerosol particles for radiative transfer simulations,
J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 2089–2111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-20-0338.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-20-0338.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Sassen(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
       Sassen, K.: The polarization lidar technique for cloud research: A
review and current assessment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 72, 1848–1866,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1991)072&lt;1848:tpltfc&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1991)072&lt;1848:tpltfc&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Sassen and Benson(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
       Sassen, K. and Benson, S.: A midlatitude cirrus cloud climatology from
the Facility for Atmospheric Remote Sensing. Part II: Microphysical properties derived from lidar depolarization,
J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2103–2112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058&lt;2103:amcccf&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058&lt;2103:amcccf&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Sassen and Zhu(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Sassen, K. and Zhu, J.: A global survey of CALIPSO linear
depolarization ratios in ice clouds: Initial findings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012279" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012279</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Sassen et al.(2012)Sassen, Kayetha, and Zhu</label><mixed-citation>
       Sassen, K., Kayetha, V. K., and Zhu, J.: Ice
cloud depolarization for nadir and off-nadir CALIPSO measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl053116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl053116</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Sato and Okamoto(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Sato, K. and Okamoto, H.: Global analysis of height-resolved ice particle
categories from spaceborne lidar, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl105522" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl105522</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Schmitt and Heymsfield(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Schmitt, C. and Heymsfield, A.: On the occurrence of hollow bullet
rosette–and column-shaped ice crystals in midlatitude cirrus, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 4514–4519,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jas2317.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jas2317.1</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Schnaiter et al.(2012)Schnaiter, Büttner, Möhler, Skrotzki, Vragel, and
Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
       Schnaiter, M., Büttner, S., Möhler, O., Skrotzki, J., Vragel, M., and
Wagner, R.: Influence of particle size and shape on the backscattering linear depolarisation ratio of small ice
crystals – cloud chamber measurements in the context of contrail and cirrus microphysics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
10465–10484, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10465-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10465-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Schnaiter et al.(2016)Schnaiter, Järvinen, Vochezer, Abdelmonem, Wagner, Jourdan, Mioche, Shcherbakov,
Schmitt, Tricoli et al.</label><mixed-citation>
       Schnaiter, M., Järvinen, E., Vochezer, P., Abdelmonem, A., Wagner,
R., Jourdan, O., Mioche, G., Shcherbakov, V. N., Schmitt, C. G., Tricoli, U., Ulanowski, Z., and Heymsfield, A. J.:
Cloud chamber experiments on the origin of ice crystal complexity in cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16,
5091–5110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5091-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5091-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Singh et al.(2024)Singh, Sanyal, and Wuebbles</label><mixed-citation>
       Singh, D. K., Sanyal, S., and Wuebbles, D. J.:
Understanding the role of contrails and contrail cirrus in climate change: a global perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
24, 9219–9262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9219-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9219-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Smith et al.(2016)Smith, Connolly, Webb, and Baran</label><mixed-citation>
       Smith, H. R., Connolly, P. J.,
Webb, A. R., and Baran, A. J.: Exact and near backscattering measurements of the linear depolarisation ratio of
various ice crystal habits generated in a laboratory cloud chamber, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 178, 361–378,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.01.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.01.030</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Tian et al.(2010)Tian, Heymsfield, Li, Heymsfield, Bansemer, Twohy, and Srivastava</label><mixed-citation>
       Tian, L.,
Heymsfield, G. M., Li, L., Heymsfield, A. J., Bansemer, A., Twohy, C. H., and Srivastava, R. C.: A study of cirrus ice
particle size distribution using TC4 observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 195–216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jas3114.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jas3114.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Ulanowski et al.(2014)Ulanowski, Kaye, Hirst, Greenaway, Cotton, Hesse, and Collier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ulanowski, Z., Kaye, P. H., Hirst, E., Greenaway, R. S., Cotton, R. J., Hesse, E., and Collier, C. T.: Incidence of
rough and irregular atmospheric ice particles from Small Ice Detector 3 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
1649–1662, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1649-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1649-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Um et al.(2015)Um, McFarquhar, Hong, Lee, Jung, Lawson, and Mo</label><mixed-citation>
       Um, J., McFarquhar, G. M., Hong,
Y. P., Lee, S.-S., Jung, C. H., Lawson, R. P., and Mo, Q.: Dimensions and aspect ratios of natural ice crystals,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3933–3956, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3933-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3933-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Urbanek et al.(2018)Urbanek, Groß, Wirth, Rolf, Krämer, and Voigt</label><mixed-citation>
       Urbanek, B.,
Groß, S., Wirth, M., Rolf, C., Krämer, M., and Voigt, C.: High depolarization ratios of naturally occurring
cirrus clouds near air traffic regions over Europe, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl079345" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl079345</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Veselovskii et al.(2010)Veselovskii, Dubovik, Kolgotin, Lapyonok, Di Girolamo, Summa, Whiteman, Mishchenko,
and Tanré</label><mixed-citation>
       Veselovskii, I., Dubovik, O., Kolgotin, A., Lapyonok, T., Di Girolamo, P.,
Summa, D., Whiteman, D. N., Mishchenko, M., and Tanré, D.: Application of randomly oriented spheroids for
retrieval of dust particle parameters from multiwavelength lidar measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014139</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Vochezer et al.(2016)Vochezer, Järvinen, Wagner, Kupiszewski, Leisner, and Schnaiter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vochezer, P., Järvinen, E., Wagner, R., Kupiszewski, P., Leisner, T., and Schnaiter, M.: In situ characterization
of mixed phase clouds using the Small Ice Detector and the Particle Phase Discriminator, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9,
159–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-159-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-159-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Wagner et al.(2006)Wagner, Benz, Möhler, Saathoff, and Schurath</label><mixed-citation>
       Wagner, R., Benz, S.,
Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., and Schurath, U.: Probing ice clouds by broadband mid-infrared extinction spectroscopy:
case studies from ice nucleation experiments in the AIDA aerosol and cloud chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4775–4800,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4775-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4775-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Walden et al.(2003)Walden, Warren, and Tuttle</label><mixed-citation>
       Walden, V. P., Warren, S. G., and Tuttle, E.:
Atmospheric ice crystals over the Antarctic Plateau in winter, J. Appl. Meteorol., 42, 1391–1405,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042&lt;1391:aicota&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042&lt;1391:aicota&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Wang et al.(2008)Wang, Chi, Liu, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, Z., Chi, R., Liu, B., and Zhou, J.: Depolarization
properties of cirrus clouds from polarization lidar measurements over Hefei in spring, Chinese Optics Letters, 6,
235–237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3788/col20080604.0235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3788/col20080604.0235</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Woods et al.(2018)Woods, Lawson, Jensen, Bui, Thornberry, Rollins, Pfister, and
Avery</label><mixed-citation>
       Woods, S., Lawson, R. P., Jensen, E., Bui, T., Thornberry, T., Rollins, A.,
Pfister, L., and Avery, M.: Microphysical properties of tropical tropopause layer cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
123, 6053–6069, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017jd028068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017jd028068</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Yang et al.(2008)Yang, Zhang, Kattawar, Warren, Baum, Huang, Hu, Winker, and Iaquinta</label><mixed-citation>
       Yang, P.,
Zhang, Z., Kattawar, G. W., Warren, S. G., Baum, B. A., Huang, H.-L., Hu, Y. X., Winker, D., and Iaquinta, J.: Effect
of cavities on the optical properties of bullet rosettes: Implications for active and passive remote sensing of ice
cloud properties, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 2311–2330, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jamc1905.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jamc1905.1</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Yang et al.(2013)Yang, Bi, Baum, Liou, Kattawar, Mishchenko, and Cole</label><mixed-citation>
       Yang, P., Bi, L.,
Baum, B. A., Liou, K.-N., Kattawar, G. W., Mishchenko, M. I., and Cole, B.: Spectrally consistent scattering,
absorption, and polarization properties of atmospheric ice crystals at wavelengths from 0.2 to 100&thinsp;µm,
J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 330–347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-12-039.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-12-039.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Zhu et al.(2023)Zhu, Wang, Konoshonkin, Kustova, Shishko, Timofeev, Tkachev, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhu, X.,
Wang, Z., Konoshonkin, A., Kustova, N., Shishko, V., Timofeev, D., Tkachev, I., and Liu, D.: Backscattering properties
of randomly oriented hexagonal hollow columns for lidar application, Optics Express, 31, 35257–35271,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.502185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.502185</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
