<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-11967-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Improved representation of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in CAM6-Chem reveals regional contrasts in its long-term changes over China</article-title><alt-title>Improved representation of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Wenxin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Yue</surname><given-names>Man</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8577-8537</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>Xinyue</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>Xinyi</given-names></name>
          <email>dongxy@nju.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3488-1451</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Minghuai</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9179-228X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Zhejiang Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Hangzhou, 310008, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Frontiers Science Center for Critical Earth Material Cycling, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences &amp; Institute for Climate and Global Change Research, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Jiangsu Meteorological Observatory, Jiangsu Meteorological Bureau, Nanjing, 210019, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Xinyi Dong (dongxy@nju.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>11967</fpage><lpage>11989</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Wenxin Zhang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e147">Isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol (ISOA) is an important component of atmospheric organic aerosol, but its formation remains incompletely represented in global chemical models, creating uncertainty in ISOA changes and their drivers. In this study, we implemented an explicit ISOA formation scheme in Community Atmosphere Model version 6 with comprehensive tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry (CAM6-Chem), incorporating high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> gas-phase epoxide precursors and explicitly representing branch-resolved heterogeneous uptake from both low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathways. Evaluation against ground-based observations shows that the updated model reasonably reproduces the concentrations and compositional structure of four explicitly represented ISOA subspecies. At the bulk aerosol level, the update alleviates the underestimation of SOA over China, improving the normalized mean bias from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76.7 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>51.6 %. ISOA formation in China is governed by NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-dependent competition between the low- and high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathways, with the former remaining dominant at the national scale. Long-term analysis for 2000–2019 shows a weak national-mean ISOA trend due to offsetting regional changes of opposite signs. The most pronounced increase occurs in Southwest China, where enhanced biogenic isoprene emissions emerge as the leading statistical predictor of the ISOA increase, with a regression-based relative contribution of 58.29 %. The strongest decrease occurs in the Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia region, where declining sulfate is identified as the leading statistical predictor, with a regression-based relative contribution of 63.37 %. These results highlight the regional heterogeneity of ISOA changes in China and the importance of jointly representing precursor supply and heterogeneous reaction conditions in simulating ISOA formation and trends.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42575126</award-id>
<award-id>42505184</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e219">Isoprene (C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>) is one of the most important biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere, with global emissions accounting for nearly half of the total biogenic VOCs emissions (Guenther et al., 2012). Owing to its very high chemical reactivity, isoprene is rapidly oxidized in the atmosphere by hydroxyl radicals (OH), ozone (O<sub>3</sub>), and nitrate radicals (NO<sub>3</sub>) (Wennberg et al., 2018). The resulting oxidation products can further undergo multiphase chemical processes to form secondary organic aerosol (SOA) with semi-volatile and low-volatility characteristics.</p>
      <p id="d2e258">The mechanisms by which isoprene forms SOA are highly sensitive to the ambient nitrogen oxides (NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>) background (Surratt et al., 2010). Under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions, the primary oxidation products of isoprene readily react with hydroperoxyl radicals (HO<sub>2</sub>) or organic peroxy radicals (RO<sub>2</sub>) to form isoprene hydroxyl hydroperoxides (ISOPOOH), as well as carbonyl and hydroxylated products (Wennberg et al., 2018). ISOPOOH is further oxidized by OH under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions to produce isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX), with a molar yield exceeding 75 % (Paulot et al., 2009b). Hereafter, this low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> sequence is referred to as the IEPOX pathway. IEPOX is highly water-soluble and reactive, and it can undergo acid-catalyzed multiphase processing to form SOA (Lin et al., 2012; Surratt et al., 2010). In these heterogeneous reactions, aerosol liquid water, sulfate, and nitrate can all act as key nucleophiles that add to the epoxide upon ring opening, producing low-volatility products. Specifically, aerosol liquid water-mediated pathways form 2-methyltetrols (2-MT) and related polyols, whereas sulfate- and nitrate-mediated nucleophilic addition produces organosulfates, organonitrates, and other oligomeric products that contribute substantially to SOA formation (Surratt et al., 2007, 2008, 2010). Under high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions, the primary oxidation products of isoprene preferentially react with nitric oxide (NO) to form important gas-phase intermediates such as methacryloyl peroxynitrate (MPAN) (Wennberg et al., 2018). Subsequent reactions of these intermediates with OH can produce epoxides, including methacrylic acid epoxide (MAE) and hydroxymethyl-methyl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-lactone (HMML) (Lin et al., 2013; Nguyen et al., 2015). After partitioning into the particle phase, these epoxides undergo acid-catalyzed ring opening and subsequent multiphase processing, in which aerosol liquid water, sulfate, and nitrate act as important nucleophiles. These reactions ultimately yield SOA components dominated by 2-methylglyceric acid (2-MG), organosulfates, and organonitrates (Birdsall et al., 2014; Nguyen et al., 2015; Schwantes et al., 2019). Hereafter, this high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> sequence encompassing both HMML and MAE is termed the HMML/MAE pathway. Although observational studies indicate that ambient concentrations of MAE and HMML are generally lower than those of IEPOX under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions (Worton et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2025), they remain key precursors for ISOA formation in high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> environments and play a non-negligible role in the isoprene oxidation system. In regions strongly influenced by human activities (e.g., urban and industrial areas), NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentrations are elevated while isoprene emissions remain substantial, making this pathway more influential for ISOA formation in such environments (Budisulistiorini et al., 2015; Rattanavaraha et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e369">To improve model performance and simulation accuracy, it is essential to better represent ISOA formation across different NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> regimes. The high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway remains insufficiently represented in global models, which can contribute to the underestimation of ISOA in polluted regions (Budisulistiorini et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2013). Observational evidence suggests that this pathway can contribute about 13 %–26 % of ISOA in urban environments, highlighting its importance under polluted conditions (Ding et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2022). Equally important is a product-level representation of IEPOX-derived ISOA (ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub>), rather than representing it as a single lumped product, because major molecular tracers such as 2-MT, organosulfate, and organonitrate products provide important constraints on ISOA composition and particle-phase processing (Chen et al., 2024b; Lin et al., 2012). Therefore, explicitly representing key ISOA subspecies from both low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> epoxide pathways provides a more complete description of ISOA formation across pollution regimes, improves the simulation of ISOA composition, and enhances the model sensitivity to changes in anthropogenic emissions.</p>
      <p id="d2e417">ISOA plays a key role at the interface of natural and anthropogenic emissions and has received wide attention in recent years (Marais et al., 2016; Shrivastava et al., 2019, 2022). ISOA formation is jointly influenced by precursor emissions, oxidative environment, and meteorological conditions, leading to significant temporal and spatial variability (Bardakov et al., 2021; Carlton et al., 2009). Over the past two decades, rapid economic development across various regions and the continuous implementation of different pollution control measures have led to significant changes in both anthropogenic pollutant emissions and meteorological conditions, resulting in notable trends in ISOA concentrations (Silver et al., 2020; Su et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2025). Therefore, it is important to further investigate the key factors and mechanisms driving these concentration changes. Existing studies on ISOA concentration changes have predominantly focused on the IEPOX pathway, where sulfate has been identified as a key driver of variability. For instance, Marais et al. (2017) found that, during 1991–2013, ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub> in the United States decreased significantly with declining sulfate, making sulfate the primary driver of the long-term summertime reduction in surface organic aerosol (OA) (Marais et al., 2017). Similarly, long-term simulations by Zheng et al. (2020) confirmed a 4.9 % per year decrease in ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub> in the southeastern United States from 2000 to 2013, attributed primarily to sulfate reductions (Zheng et al., 2020). This finding was consistent with Dong et al. (2022), who showed that sulfate reductions in southern China corresponded to declines in ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub> (Dong et al., 2022). Zhang et al. (2025) also reported that sulfate decreases across China were accompanied by a decline in ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub> (Zhang et al., 2025). Liu et al. (2023) also observed that decreasing sulfate emissions contributed significantly to the decline in ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub> over the continental United States based on long-term model simulations (Liu et al., 2023). However, some studies that consider the HMML/MAE pathway report different results, indicating that the dominant drivers of ISOA can vary by region and environment. For instance, Hu et al. (2025) showed that in Shanghai during 2015–2021, anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions were the primary driver of ISOA reduction, with sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) and aerosol acidity playing secondary roles (Hu et al., 2025). Similarly, Budisulistiorini et al. (2015) found in the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study that human pollution significantly influenced both the IEPOX and HMML/MAE pathways, with sulfate and NO<sub>3</sub> affecting their relative importance in urban areas (Budisulistiorini et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d2e494">Despite these advances, existing studies still rarely assess long-term ISOA changes by simultaneously considering pathway competition under different NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emission backgrounds and the multiphase reaction environment. Given the large regional contrasts in emissions, meteorological conditions, and oxidation environments across China (Ding et al., 2016; Li et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2017), the dominant factors controlling ISOA formation and change are likely to differ by region. To further explore this question, a model framework is needed that can represent both low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> epoxide pathways and distinguish their major reaction branches and products. The continuous development of SOA representation in large-scale models provides an important foundation for this purpose. Representations of biogenic SOA have evolved from simplified empirical or fixed-yield treatments used in early global models (Chung and Seinfeld, 2002; Chin et al., 2002; Carlton et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2015), through semi-empirical two-product absorptive partitioning models (Odum et al., 1996; Griffin et al., 1999), to the Volatility Basis Set (VBS) approach (Donahue et al., 2006; Robinson et al., 2007; Pye and Seinfeld, 2010), and more recently to explicit multiphase reactive uptake parameterizations for isoprene epoxides (Pye et al., 2013; Budisulistiorini et al., 2017; Jo et al., 2019, 2021; Ng et al., 2025). These developments allow ISOA formation to respond more directly to aerosol liquid water, acidity, sulfate, and other nucleophiles, and particle-phase reaction kinetics (Pye et al., 2013; Marais et al., 2016; Budisulistiorini et al., 2017; Jo et al., 2019, 2021). Building on this progress, this study extends the CAM6-Chem framework by incorporating high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> epoxide precursors and subsequent heterogeneous reactions, distinguishing between H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition and inorganic-nucleophile addition product classes, and evaluating how these updates affect ISOA composition and long-term ISOA trends over China. This framework further allows us to examine how ISOA trends are jointly controlled by precursor supply and heterogeneous reaction capacity across different regions. Nevertheless, important uncertainties remain in the current ISOA framework, including the simplified core-shell treatment of epoxide reactive uptake, uncertainties in aerosol phase state, organic-shell viscosity, phase separation, and diffusion limitations, as well as limited kinetic constraints for HMML/MAE uptake. Additional uncertainties arise from the assumptions of 100 % ISOA yield and non-volatile epoxide-derived products, and from the possible omission of non-epoxide ISOA pathways in the current framework. Despite these remaining uncertainties, clarifying regional ISOA trends and controls can provide a scientific basis for evaluating how emission reductions jointly affect precursor supply and heterogeneous reaction environments, and for developing more targeted regional air-quality management strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model Description</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Model Configuration</title>
      <p id="d2e564">This study employs the Community Atmosphere Model version 6 with comprehensive tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry (CAM6-Chem) within the Community Earth System Model version 2.1.0 (CESM2.1.0). Biogenic emissions are calculated online using the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1), which is coupled to CESM (Emmons et al., 2020; Guenther et al., 2012). Anthropogenic emissions are taken from the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC; <uri>http://www.meicmodel.org</uri>, last access: 10 May 2025) (Li et al., 2017). In this study, intermediate-volatility organic compounds (IVOCs) and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) represent lumped lower-volatility organic precursor classes defined by volatility rather than explicitly speciated molecular structures. Emissions of IVOCs and SVOCs are scaled from primary organic aerosol (POA) and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) emissions (Chang et al., 2022; Tilmes et al., 2019). The specific scaling equations and coefficients are described in the Supplement of Zhang et al. (2025) (Eqs. A1–A3). Meteorological fields are constrained by the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA2) reanalysis data (Gelaro et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d2e570">Gas-phase chemistry follows MOZART-TS2 (Model of Ozone And Related chemical Tracers, Troposphere-Stratosphere V2), including comprehensive isoprene and monoterpenes chemistry (Schwantes et al., 2020). Aerosols are represented using the four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) (Liu et al., 2016). This study employs two different approaches to treat SOA formation. First, the VBS approach (Donahue et al., 2006; Hodzic et al., 2016) represents the gas-particle interconversion of organic compounds. Organic compounds (including glyoxal, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, benzene, toluene, lumped xylenes, IVOCs, and SVOCs) are oxidized to form gas-phase SOA precursors in five volatility bins, with effective saturation concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at 300 K) of 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, and 100.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>. These precursors subsequently partition between the gas and particle phases (Tilmes et al., 2019). This VBS treatment follows the default CAM6-Chem SOA scheme and was not modified in this study. Second, SOA formation from isoprene gas phase products is treated explicitly (Sect. 2.1.2). In addition to ISOA, all other SOA are simulated using the VBS approach. Photolysis rates for monoterpene-derived SOA were updated based on our previous work (Liu et al., 2023). Aerosol wet removal scheme uses the Cloud Layers Unified By Binormals (CLUBB) scheme to provide a unified treatment of shallow convection and stratiform clouds, coupled with the two-moment cloud microphysics scheme by Gettelman and Morrison (2015) (MG2) to represent aerosol activation and removal (Gettelman and Morrison, 2015). This study adopts the Zhang and McFarlane (1995) (ZM95) parameterization for deep convective clouds and treats aerosol wet scavenging using empirical coefficients (Zhang and McFarlane, 1995).</p>
      <p id="d2e604">The earlier CAM6-Chem configuration described by Zhang et al. (2025) represents ISOA formation mainly through the low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway, in which ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub> is treated as a lumped product. This lumped low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> representation limits the model's ability to describe ISOA formation across different NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> regimes and to distinguish product-level responses to changes in the particle-phase reaction environment. To address this limitation, Sect. 2.1.2 describes the explicit ISOA representation adopted in this study. This explicit representation introduces high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> epoxide precursors and their subsequent heterogeneous uptake, allowing the model to characterize ISOA formation in urban and polluted regions where the high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway can contribute substantially to total ISOA. It also resolves reactive-uptake-derived ISOA into product classes formed via H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition and inorganic-nucleophile addition (involving sulfate, nitrate, and bisulfate ions), thereby improving the model's ability to represent ISOA compositional changes associated with aerosol liquid water, inorganic nucleophiles, and acidity. Overall, this explicit ISOA formation mechanism enhances the model's sensitivity to changes in anthropogenic emissions and climate conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>New processes added to isoprene chemistry</title>
      <p id="d2e679">Under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions, the MOZART-TS2 gas-phase mechanism is retained, in which ISOPOOH reacts with OH to produce IEPOX with a molar branching ratio of 0.85. Under high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions, following Lin et al. (2013), the gas-phase isoprene chemistry is expanded to explicitly represent MPAN and its subsequent reaction with OH (Lin et al., 2013). Methacrolein (MACR), the precursor of MPAN in the high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway, is formed following the default MOZART-TS2 mechanism. The reaction of MPAN with OH yields HMML and MAE, with molar branching ratios of 0.75 and 0.02, respectively, based on the experimental results reported by Nguyen et al. (2015) (Table S2). No explicit threshold is imposed to separate low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> regimes. Pathway contributions are determined dynamically by competition between RO<sub>2</sub> reacting with NO and RO<sub>2</sub> reacting with HO<sub>2</sub>. To avoid double-counting between the default lumped VBS representation of ISOA and the explicitly represented epoxide-derived ISOA pathways, the OH-initiated isoprene oxidation pathway in the VBS scheme is removed (see Sect. 2.1.1). This treatment focuses the updated mechanism on epoxide-derived ISOA formation, although potential non-epoxide ISOA contributions originally included implicitly in the VBS scheme may not be explicitly resolved.</p>
      <p id="d2e755">The reactive uptake parameterization and condensed-phase reaction constants used in this study were adopted from the IEPOX reactive uptake framework of Jo et al. (2019, 2021). Due to limited laboratory constraints on the multiphase kinetics of HMML and MAE, HMML and MAE are treated as IEPOX-like epoxide precursors in the current implementation. This treatment is consistent with previous modeling practice. For example, Pye et al. (2013) treated HMML like MAE in terms of heterogeneous uptake and assumed the particle-phase reaction rate constants of MAE to be the same as those of IEPOX due to the lack of kinetic data. Zhang et al. (2022) also noted that most HMML-related reaction parameters in models are commonly assumed to be the same as those for IEPOX. Following these studies, HMML and MAE are assigned the same solubility, diffusivity, and condensed-phase reaction constants as IEPOX in our implementation. Although a recent field-based study has estimated effective uptake parameters for IEPOX and lumped HMML/MAE, these constraints are not directly applicable here because they do not provide a complete set of standalone, compound-specific solubility, diffusivity, and branch-resolved condensed-phase reaction constants for HMML and MAE (Zhu et al., 2025). As a result, this IEPOX-like treatment introduces uncertainty in the absolute uptake rates of HMML and MAE and may affect the modeled quantitative partitioning between high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> ISOA formation pathways. This study utilizes the Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC) aerosol module (Jo et al., 2019, 2021; Zaveri et al., 2008, 2021) to calculate the dynamic partitioning of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, HNO<sub>3</sub>, HCl, and NH<sub>3</sub> across different modes and the associated particle-phase thermodynamics. Aerosol pH for each mode is calculated online using MOSAIC, as integrated into CESM by Zaveri et al. (2021) and Lu et al. (2021). Additionally, following Jo et al. (2019), we used the modified version of MOSAIC, which calculates submicron (aitken and accumulation modes) aerosol pH, excluding sea salt (Jo et al., 2019). Subsequently, following the resistor model equation of Gaston et al. (2014), this study calculates the reactive uptake coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for IEPOX, HMML, and MAE (Gaston et al., 2014). The governing expression is:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the reactive uptake coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean molecular speed of epoxides (m s<sup>−1</sup>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle radius (m), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas-phase diffusion coefficient of epoxides (10<sup>−5</sup> m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass accommodation coefficient (0.1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the universal gas constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.2057</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L atm mol<sup>−1</sup> K<sup>−1</sup>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature (K), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Henry's law coefficient in the organic layer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<sup>−1</sup>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diffusion coefficient of epoxides in the organic layer. The term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cot⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>cot⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where the function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M89" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>cot⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>cot⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>cot⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Henry's law coefficient in the aqueous core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M atm<sup>−1</sup>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diffusion coefficient of epoxides in the aqueous core (10<sup>−9</sup> m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). The variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined as:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M100" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the inorganic aqueous core radius (m), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the pseudo-first-order reaction rate constant of epoxides in the organic shell (s<sup>−1</sup>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total pseudo-first-order aqueous-phase reaction rate constant (s<sup>−1</sup>), calculated as the sum of all particle-phase reaction channels that consume each precursor:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M106" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nuc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The first term represents the acid-catalyzed ring-opening followed by nucleophilic addition of aerosol liquid water, leading to H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition products. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the corresponding effective H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition rate constant (0.036 M<sup>−1</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), with aerosol liquid water treated as the solvent and included implicitly, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the proton concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The second term represents acid-catalyzed ring opening followed by nucleophilic addition of sulfate and nitrate ions, leading to organosulfates and organonitrates. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nuc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the third-order rate constant for sulfate- and nitrate-addition reactions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration of sulfate and nitrate ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The third term represents concerted protonation and nucleophilic addition by bisulfate, leading to organosulfates. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reaction rate constant due to the presence of bisulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M<sup>−1</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bisulfate concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e2089">For each precursor considered here, including IEPOX, HMML, and MAE, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to calculate the reactive uptake coefficient and the total uptake flux. The resulting particle-phase ISOA production is then distributed into the H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition and inorganic-nucleophile addition product classes according to the relative contribution of each reaction channel to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition class is represented by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel, whereas the inorganic-nucleophile addition class combines the sulfate-, nitrate-, and bisulfate-assisted channels, which are collectively represented by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nuc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The corresponding branching ratios for the two product classes are defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BR</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BR</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> , respectively:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M134" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BR</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BR</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nuc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            This relative-rate branching treatment follows the approach of Budisulistiorini et al. (2017), in which ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub> speciation between tetrols and organosulfates was determined from the relative rates of precursor conversion to these products. This study follows the approach of Jo et al. (2021), where the reactivity of epoxides in the organic shell was parameterized with the same reaction rate constant as in the aqueous phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This treatment follows the Jo et al. (2019, 2021) core-shell framework and represents a simplifying assumption, because phase separation, organic-shell viscosity, and differences in acidity between the inorganic core and organic shell may alter epoxide diffusion and reactivity (Schmedding et al., 2020; Farrell et al., 2025). Furthermore, considering the strong sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to relative humidity (RH) in the atmosphere, this study accounts for the RH dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as described in Table S3 of Zhang et al. (2018).</p>
      <p id="d2e2585">As illustrated in Fig. 1, the uptake-derived ISOA product classes are mapped to four model species. ISOA formed from the heterogeneous uptake of IEPOX is divided into two product classes: 2-MT (AIETET), produced through the H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition channel, and organosulfate/organonitrate products (AIEOSN), produced through the inorganic-nucleophile addition channel. Similarly, ISOA formed from HMML and MAE is divided into 2-MG (AHMGA), produced through the H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition channel, and organosulfate/organonitrate products (AHMOSN), produced through the inorganic-nucleophile addition channel. AIEOSN and AHMOSN are lumped product classes that include both organosulfates and organonitrates but may be dominated by organosulfates. Recent kinetic evidence indicates that HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is substantially less nucleophilic toward IEPOX than SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cooke et al., 2024), while nitrate is weaker than sulfate in related epoxide systems (Mael et al., 2015). Tertiary organonitrates can also be rapidly hydrolyzed by water to form polyols or undergo nucleophilic substitution by sulfate to form organosulfates (Darer et al., 2011). The internal organosulfate/organonitrate composition of these lumped classes is not explicitly resolved in the model. The ISOA yield from the reactive uptake of IEPOX, HMML, and MAE is assumed to be 100 %, and ISOA derived from these epoxides is treated as non-volatile in the model. This assumption is in agreement with previous modeling studies (Budisulistiorini et al., 2017; Marais et al., 2016; Schmedding et al., 2019; Stadtler et al., 2018), which are based on field observations indicating that ISOA from these epoxides in the atmosphere exhibits very low volatility (Hu et al., 2016; Riva et al., 2019). Once ISOA from IEPOX, HMML, and MAE is formed, no further oxidation is represented in the model, consistent with previous modeling studies (Budisulistiorini et al., 2017; Marais et al., 2016; Schmedding et al., 2019). However, this assumption represents a limitation in the treatment of 2-methyltetrol sulfates (2-MTS), major IEPOX-derived organosulfates represented within the lumped AIEOSN species, because 2-MTS have been shown to undergo heterogeneous OH oxidation in laboratory-generated aerosol particles (Chen et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2024) and aqueous-phase OH oxidation in cloud, fog, and aerosol water mimics (Royer et al., 2026). Several oxidation products have also been detected in ambient fine aerosols (Chen et al., 2020).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2636">Schematic of the explicit isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol (ISOA) formation mechanism implemented in CAM6-Chem in this study. Dashed arrows indicate gas-phase reactions, whereas solid arrows indicate particle-phase heterogeneous uptake and product-formation reactions. Species explicitly represented as updated ISOA precursors or product classes in this mechanism are shown in green, and the explicitly represented ISOA formation pathways are shown in orange. AeroWater denotes aerosol liquid water. AIETET denotes IEPOX-derived 2-methyltetrols, and AHMGA denotes HMML/MAE-derived 2-methylglyceric acid. AIEOSN and AHMOSN denote lumped inorganic-nucleophile addition product classes from the IEPOX and HMML/MAE pathways, respectively. These classes include both organosulfates and organonitrates but may be dominated by organosulfates.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Model experiments and observational data</title>
      <p id="d2e2654">This study simulates the years 2000, 2006, 2012, 2016, and 2019 at a horizontal resolution of 0.95° (latitude) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25° (longitude). The vertical grid comprises 32 layers with a model top of around 40 km. For each simulated year, a 3-month spin-up is applied to minimize the influence of initial conditions, and a 50 h relaxation (nudging) timescale is used throughout the simulation.</p>
      <p id="d2e2664">This study uses ground-based observations reported by Ding et al. (2016). The record spans October 2012 to September 2013 and provides annual and seasonal mass concentrations of two ISOA tracers, AIETET and AHMGA. The dataset comprises twelve sites, including five urban, three suburban, and four rural locations, and provides the geographic coordinates for each site. In total, 294 sets of field samples were compiled across the four seasons and summarized by site and by season for both tracers, enabling comparison with the model on consistent temporal and spatial scales. In addition, we used observations reported by Zhang et al. (2022), who conducted a 1-year measurement campaign from October 2013 to November 2014 at three urban sites from northern to southern China, namely Beijing, Hefei, and Kunming (Zhang et al., 2022). This dataset reports paired ISOA products formed through the IEPOX and HMML pathways, and provides site-resolved annual-average concentrations for key species, which are useful for evaluating the simulated ISOA composition and pathway partitioning over urban China. In addition, we used ground-based observational compilations assembled by Miao et al. (2021) and Chen et al. (2024a). These compilations summarize site-mean surface mass concentrations of OA, POA, and SOA across China for 2013–2019, together with the corresponding site location (Chen et al., 2024a; Miao et al., 2021). After selecting records within our study period and removing duplicates, a total of 39 measurements were retained for model evaluation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and Discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Evaluation of model performance</title>
      <p id="d2e2683">By comparing the simulated results with ground-based observations, we evaluated the performance of the CAM6-Chem configuration using the explicit ISOA representation adopted in this study (Fig. 2). For all normalized mean biases (NMB) calculations in this section, model outputs were sampled at the corresponding observational site locations and averaged over the same observational periods before calculating the model-observation differences. The paired model and observational values from different sites and time periods were then combined across all paired samples to calculate the NMB, thereby accounting for the site-specific locations and different temporal coverage of the observational datasets. Overall, the mechanism-updated model can more comprehensively capture the concentrations of key ISOA subspecies and better reproduce their relative contributions (Fig. 2c). Additionally, it alleviates the systematic underestimation of OA and SOA in the earlier CAM6-Chem configuration (Zhang et al., 2025). We evaluated the simulated AIETET and AHMGA against ground-based observations from Ding et al. (2016) (Fig. 2a). The simulation using this explicit ISOA representation generally captures the concentration ranges and variability of these two subspecies, but still shows an overall positive bias. Based on monthly means in log space, the NMB values are 61.41 % for AIETET and 89.18 % for AHMGA, with corresponding Pearson correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.75 and 0.54, respectively. Several factors may contribute to these positive biases. First, missing or simplified competing pathways may cause an over-allocation of epoxide precursors to the explicitly represented ISOA products. For example, a fraction of IEPOX-derived carbon may form structurally characterized C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>3</sub> reactive uptake products (Frauenheim et al., 2022). These semivolatile products can repartition from the particle phase to the gas phase and undergo gas-phase OH oxidation to form additional isoprene-derived SOA (Frauenheim et al., 2024). This competing product branch and its subsequent gas-phase oxidation are not explicitly represented in the model. Omission of this branch may therefore lead to excessive allocation of IEPOX-derived carbon to AIETET, contributing to its positive bias. In addition, previous studies have shown that AIETET and AHMGA are sensitive to factors such as pathway branching, mass transfer, reaction kinetics, and aerosol phase state. For example, uncertainties in the relative rates of water addition versus organosulfate formation can affect the predicted product distribution between 2-MT and organosulfate products (Budisulistiorini et al., 2017). Similarly, assumptions related to aerosol phase state, organic-shell viscosity, and phase separation can influence IEPOX reactive uptake and may affect the simulated abundance of IEPOX-derived tracers (Zhang et al., 2018, 2019; Chen et al., 2024b). In particular, the current core-shell uptake treatment assumes the same reaction rate coefficient in the organic shell and aqueous core. If phase separation and viscous organic coatings impose stronger diffusion limitations than represented here, effective epoxide uptake may be reduced in the real atmosphere, and the model may overestimate ISOA formation, especially under conditions with high organic coatings or strong phase separation. For AHMGA, uncertainties in the multiphase uptake and reaction parameters of HMML/MAE may also contribute to the model bias, because compound-specific constraints for these high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> epoxides remain limited (Zhang et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2025). Accordingly, positive biases of several tens of percent have also been reported in earlier modeling studies. For instance, Fahey et al. (2017) reported that, in a regional evaluation using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, the NMB of AHMGA reached 78.6 % under their revised scheme (Fahey et al., 2017), whereas Chen et al. (2024b) found a pronounced overestimation of AIETET in a baseline configuration (NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 58 %) in their evaluation of IEPOX multiphase parameterization (Chen et al., 2024b). Therefore, the magnitude of the overestimation in this study is comparable to that reported previously, although the exact sources of bias may differ across models and configurations. It further suggests that incorporating a more complete set of competitive loss processes and additional constraints on multiphase chemistry may help reduce subspecies-level biases in future work.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2739"><bold>(a)</bold> Evaluation of simulated 2-methyltetrols (AIETET) and 2-methylglyceric acid (AHMGA) concentrations against ground-based observations from Ding et al. (2016) (ng m<sup>−3</sup>). Statistical metrics were calculated using monthly means in log space. The dark gray solid line denotes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line, and the light gray solid lines denote the factor-of-10 range. <bold>(b)</bold> Evaluation of simulated organic aerosol (OA) and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) concentrations before and after the mechanism update against ground-based observations compiled from Miao et al. (2021) and Chen et al. (2024a) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). Filled circles represent simulations before the update, while open circles represent simulations after the update. Blue and magenta markers denote OA and SOA, respectively. The inset annotation summarizes the changes in normalized mean bias (NMB) from the original to the updated simulation. The dark gray solid line denotes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line, and the light gray dashed lines denote the factor-of-two range. <bold>(c)</bold> Comparison of ISOA product composition between ground-based observations adapted from Zhang et al. (2022) and the updated model simulation in this study. The grouped stacked bars show the relative contribution of each ISOA product to total measured or simulated ISOA at Beijing, Hefei, and Kunming. For each city, the left bar represents the observed composition and the right bar represents the updated model.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2813">At the bulk OA and SOA levels, we further evaluated model performance against observations from Miao et al. (2021) and Chen et al. (2024a) by comparing the simulated results from the earlier CAM6-Chem configuration described by Zhang et al. (2025) with those from the CAM6-Chem configuration using the explicit ISOA representation adopted in this study (Fig. 2b). The results show that the explicit ISOA representation implemented in this study substantially reduces the underestimation of SOA, with the NMB improving from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76.7 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>51.6 %. This improvement reflects the enhanced representation of ISOA formation introduced in this study, since other SOA formation pathways were not modified relative to the earlier CAM6-Chem configuration. The underestimation of total OA is also alleviated, with the NMB improving from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47.0 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.7 %. Although the available observations do not support a robust spatiotemporal decomposition of this improvement, the model results suggest that the explicit ISOA representation may affect bulk OA/SOA simulations more strongly in regions with higher anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions (Fig. S2c in the Supplement), where high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway products contribute more substantially to ISOA (Fig. 3b and c). Beyond this bulk evaluation, we further assessed the relative composition of modeled ISOA product classes using ground-based measurements of ISOA tracers from Beijing, Hefei, and Kunming (Zhang et al., 2022) (Fig. 2c). The comparison shows that the explicit ISOA representation adopted in this study can reproduce the relative contributions of the major observed ISOA species and yields a reasonable compositional distribution consistent with the available observations. In particular, the simulation using this explicit ISOA representation reproduces the dominant contribution of AIETET and the relatively small contributions of inorganic-nucleophile addition class products, including AIEOSN and AHMOSN. This result indicates that the product-speciation treatment captures the observed dominance of H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition products in the available molecular tracer composition, which is also consistent with previous field observations showing relatively small contributions from inorganic-nucleophile-addition products (He et al., 2018). Although 2-MTS can contribute substantially to fine-particle organic carbon in some regions (Hettiyadura et al., 2019), available observations of 2-MTS and 2-methylglyceric acid sulfate in China have limited spatial coverage, and the two compounds are not separately resolved within the lumped AIEOSN and AHMOSN classes, respectively. Accordingly, Fig. 2c provides a product-class-level comparison of relative contributions rather than a species-specific evaluation of absolute concentrations. Residual discrepancies in individual product fractions may also reflect uncertainties in the reactive uptake parameterization, possible missing transformation or loss processes, and the representation of the heterogeneous reaction medium, including the effective abundance and accessibility of different inorganic nucleophiles. This improvement is important because it demonstrates that the explicitly represented reaction pathways and product-speciation treatment are chemically meaningful and enhance the model's capability to reproduce both the magnitude and composition of ambient ISOA, providing a more robust modeling foundation for the subsequent quantitative attribution of ISOA changes and their driving factors.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2875"><bold>(a)</bold> Annual mean surface concentrations of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol (ISOA) over China, averaged over the five simulation years (2000, 2006, 2012, 2016, and 2019) (unit: ng m<sup>−3</sup>). <bold>(b)</bold> Spatial distribution of the contribution of high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway products, including 2-methylglyceric acid (AHMGA) and organosulfate/organonitrate products from the high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway (AHMOSN), to annual mean total ISOA over China, averaged over the five simulation years (unit: %). <bold>(c)</bold> Composition of surface ISOA subspecies in six regions of China, including Southwest China (SWC), the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region (BTH), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), the Pearl River Delta (PRD), the Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia region (SGN), and Northeast China (NEC), based on annual mean concentrations averaged over the five simulation years. Pie charts show the fractional contributions of individual ISOA subspecies, and the circle size represents the corresponding surface ISOA concentration (unit: ng m<sup>−3</sup>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Spatial and seasonal characteristics of ISOA and pathway contributions</title>
      <p id="d2e2943">The simulations show pronounced regional contrasts in the spatial distribution of ISOA over China (Fig. 3a). Total ISOA forms a major hotspot in Southwest China (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ng m<sup>−3</sup>), remains relatively high in Southeastern China, and is generally lower over North China and Northwestern China. In terms of composition, AIETET is the dominant subspecies and accounts for the largest national fraction (88.9 %). AHMGA is the second-largest contributor (6.9 %). The spatial patterns of these two subspecies are broadly consistent with the hotspot of total ISOA (Fig. S1). In contrast, AIEOSN (3.9 %) and AHMOSN (0.3 %) contribute less to the national burden on average. They are more pronounced in typical high-emission regions in Eastern China. This enhancement is especially evident over major urban and industrial clusters such as the North China Plain, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta (Fig. 3c). In these NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-rich regions, the relative contributions of AHMGA and AHMOSN increase markedly. Together they account for approximately 17 %–21 % of the total ISOA (Fig. 3b). These results indicate that the explicit ISOA representation adopted in this study enables a more comprehensive characterization of ISOA composition and concentration levels by resolving uptake-derived ISOA into different product classes. It is also noteworthy that the concentration differences of AHMGA and AHMOSN between polluted regions and the southwestern hotspot are smaller than those of the low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway products (Fig. S1). This feature indicates a relatively more spatially distributed pattern for these high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway products. Overall, the subspecies collectively characterize the spatial heterogeneity of ISOA. Low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway components dominate the national burden and define the primary hotspot. High-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pathway components contribute less to the national average burden, but their relative contributions are more evident over eastern urban and industrial regions (Fig. 3c).</p>
      <p id="d2e3014">In addition to the pronounced spatial heterogeneity, ISOA also shows strong seasonal variability (Fig. 4). Based on the 5-year monthly means, surface ISOA increases markedly during the warm season and reaches a maximum in summer. Summer ISOA concentrations are approximately 3 to 5 times higher than those in winter (Fig. 4a). The compositional information in Fig. 4a further shows that the warm-season enhancement of ISOA is dominated by ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub>, particularly AIETET. In contrast, AIEOSN and ISOA<sub>HMML+MAE</sub> remain minor components of the national mean ISOA, although they also exhibit higher concentrations during the warm season. Overall, the seasonal cycle of total ISOA at the national scale is primarily driven by AIETET. Biogenic isoprene emissions exhibit a similar seasonal cycle. They increase rapidly from spring and peak in summer, which is generally consistent with the timing of the ISOA maximum (Fig. 4a). The standardized seasonal cycle further shows that the standardized OH signal also peaks in summer, indicating that enhanced precursor supply and oxidation capacity jointly support the summer ISOA maximum (Fig. 4b). However, the standardized sulfate and aerosol liquid water anomalies show different seasonal patterns from total ISOA. The standardized sulfate and aerosol liquid water anomalies are positive in winter and become negative in summer, while the standardized aerosol pH shows positive anomalies in late spring and early summer (Fig. 4b). Therefore, the summer ISOA maximum occurs even when sulfate and aerosol liquid water are below their annual-mean levels in the standardized seasonal cycle, suggesting that the strong increases in isoprene emissions and OH oxidation capacity outweigh the less favorable multiphase conditions during summer. The early warm-season ISOA enhancement from April to May further illustrates this combined-control behavior, but with a different balance among the controlling factors. It occurs before the annual maximum of isoprene emissions and during the rising phase of the standardized seasonal OH signal, but at a time when biogenic isoprene emissions have already increased substantially from spring, OH oxidation capacity is strengthening, and the multiphase reaction environment has not yet reached its least favorable summer state. Thus, the May enhancement likely reflects the combined influence of increasing precursor supply, enhanced oxidation, and still favorable multiphase conditions, rather than the dominance of a single factor. Overall, these features indicate that the seasonal cycle of total ISOA cannot be explained by one controlling factor alone, but instead reflects the combined effects of emission strength, oxidation intensity, and multiphase chemical conditions.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3042"><bold>(a)</bold> Monthly variations of surface isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol (ISOA) subspecies (left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: ng m<sup>−3</sup>) and biogenic isoprene emissions (ISOP emis; right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: Tg) in China, based on the climatological monthly means averaged over the five simulation years (2000, 2006, 2012, 2016, and 2019). <bold>(b)</bold> Standardized monthly variations of background chemical and aerosol variables relevant to ISOA formation, including surface aerosol pH, surface sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations, surface aerosol liquid water (AeroWater) concentrations, and surface hydroxyl radical (OH) concentrations in China, based on the climatological monthly means averaged over the five simulation years.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3098">ISOA formation is strongly influenced by the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> background, so competition exists between the IEPOX pathway and the HMML/MAE pathway. Overall, the HMML/MAE pathway contributes less to ISOA than the IEPOX pathway, but its relative importance varies across regions and seasons.</p>
      <p id="d2e3110">We use ratio-based metrics to quantify the relative contributions of the two pathways. For the national mean ISOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HMML</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IEPOX</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the annual mean ratio is about 0.07 (Fig. 5c), indicating that the IEPOX pathway dominates at the national scale. A further analysis for densely populated regions such as the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region shows a higher ratio that still remains well below 1 (Fig. S7). This indicates that the IEPOX pathway remains the primary source of ISOA even in NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-rich regions.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3146">Monthly variations of IEPOX-related and HMML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAE-related gas-phase precursors, particle-phase production rates, and ISOA concentrations in China, based on the climatological monthly means averaged over the five simulation years (2000, 2006, 2012, 2016, and 2019). <bold>(a)</bold> Surface concentrations of isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX; dark-blue bars; left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: ppb) and hydroxymethyl-methyl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-lactone plus methacrylic acid epoxide (HMML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAE; pink bars; right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: ppb). <bold>(b)</bold> Particle-phase ISOA production rates diagnosed from tagged heterogeneous reactions for the IEPOX pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IEPOX</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; dark-blue bars; left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: ng m<sup>−3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>) and the HMML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAE pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOA</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HMML</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; pink bars; right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: ng m<sup>−3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>). <bold>(c)</bold> Surface concentrations of ISOA derived from IEPOX (ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub>; dark-blue bars; left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: ng m<sup>−3</sup>) and ISOA derived from HMML and MAE (ISOA<sub>HMML+MAE</sub>; pink bars; right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: ng m<sup>−3</sup>). In each panel, the black dashed line denotes the ratio of the HMML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAE-related quantity to the corresponding IEPOX-related quantity, with monthly ratio values labeled above the markers.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3375">The national mean ISOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HMML</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IEPOX</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not constant throughout the year. It becomes relatively higher in late summer and early autumn and reaches its annual maximum in September (Fig. 5c). To interpret this feature, we further compare the gas-phase precursors and particle-phase production rates diagnosed from the tagged heterogeneous reactions for the two pathways. The ratio of the gas-phase epoxide precursors HMML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAE to IEPOX shows only a modest seasonal variation and generally remains within about 0.074 to 0.10 throughout the year (Fig. 5a). The ratio of tagged particle-phase ISOA production rates, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HMML</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IEPOX</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exhibits a similar seasonal pattern, with an annual mean of about 0.10 (Fig. 5b). These results indicate that neither the HMML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAE-to-IEPOX precursor ratio nor the corresponding tagged particle-phase ISOA production-rate ratio shows a comparably strong increase in September. Therefore, the September peak in the ISOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HMML</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IEPOX</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is not primarily driven by an enhanced relative precursor abundance or production rate of the HMML/MAE pathway, but rather by the stronger decrease in ISOA<sub>IEPOX</sub> relative to ISOA<sub>HMML+MAE</sub> from August to September, as shown in Fig. 5c. As a result, the ISOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HMML</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IEPOX</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio increases from 0.089 in August to 0.114 in September, corresponding to an absolute increase of 0.025 in the dimensionless ratio, or a relative increase of 28.1 %, and reaches its annual maximum in September. Overall, the HMML/MAE pathway becomes relatively more important during late summer to early autumn, but the IEPOX pathway still dominates ISOA formation on the national average.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3507">Long-term trends in annual mean surface concentrations of biogenic isoprene emissions (<bold>a</bold>; unit: g m<sup>−2</sup> per 20 years), anthropogenic sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) emissions (<bold>b</bold>; unit: g m<sup>−2</sup> per 20 years), and anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>) emissions (<bold>c</bold>; unit: g m<sup>−2</sup> per 20 years), and of surface isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol (ISOA) concentrations (<bold>d</bold>; ng m<sup>−3</sup> per 20 years), surface sulfate concentrations (<bold>e</bold>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> per 20 years), and surface aerosol liquid water (AeroWater) concentrations (<bold>f</bold>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> per 20 years), in China from 2000 to 2019. The two boxed regions denote Southwest China (SWC) and the Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia region (SGN), respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Trend and attribution of ISOA</title>
      <p id="d2e3650">This section first presents the spatial distribution of long-term trends in surface ISOA over China during 2000–2019, along with the corresponding trends in its key controlling factors, and identifies the regions with the most pronounced ISOA changes. It then uses multiple linear regression to diagnose the dominant drivers of simulated ISOA variability. Sulfate and aerosol liquid water are key components of the multiphase reaction environment: sulfate can provide inorganic nucleophiles for particle-phase reactions, whereas aerosol liquid water provides an aqueous medium for heterogeneous processing (Budisulistiorini et al., 2017; Eddingsaas et al., 2010). Proton availability further catalyzes the ring-opening of epoxide groups, a key step in ISOA formation (Gaston et al., 2014; Pye et al., 2013). Biogenic isoprene emissions provide the direct gas-phase precursor supply for ISOA formation, whereas anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions influence the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-dependent oxidation chemistry. Based on these considerations, simulated monthly ISOA concentration was used as the dependent variable, and proton concentration (H<sup>+</sup>), sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>), biogenic isoprene emissions (ISOP emis, g m<sup>−2</sup>), anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions (Anthro NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emis, g m<sup>−2</sup>), and aerosol liquid water (AeroWater, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) were included as predictors in the regression analysis.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3781">Long-term trends in China (pink bar), Southwest China (SWC; bright yellow bar), and the Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia region (SGN; dark blue bar) of <bold>(a)</bold> surface isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol (ISOA) and its major subspecies, and <bold>(b)</bold> biogenic isoprene emissions (ISOP emis), anthropogenic sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) emissions (Anthro SO<sub>2</sub> emis), anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>) emissions (Anthro NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emis), surface sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations, and surface aerosol liquid water (AeroWater) concentrations. Bars indicate relative trends over 20 years (% per 20 years).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3848">Our nationwide analysis indicates that the long-term evolution of surface ISOA over China is relatively weak in the national mean. Overall, total surface ISOA decreases by 10.23 ng m<sup>−3</sup> per 20 years (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.67 % per 20 years) from 2000 to 2019. This net change arises from competing trends among the major ISOA subspecies, with the largest decreases occurring in AIETET, followed by AIEOSN, while concurrent increases in other subspecies partly offset these declines. Over the same period, the key controlling factors also show systematic but contrasting national-scale changes, with biogenic isoprene emissions and anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions increasing by 5.38 % and 48.75 % per 20 years, respectively, while anthropogenic SO<sub>2</sub> emissions, sulfate, and aerosol liquid water decrease by 75.12 %, 43.15 %, and 5.54 % per 20 years, respectively (Figs. 6 and 7). These changes imply enhanced precursor supply under rising NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> but a weakened heterogeneous reaction medium at the national scale. All trends were derived from linear regressions based on annual data from 2000 to 2019. The weak national-mean trend does not imply spatial uniformity and may instead reflect the cancellation of regionally heterogeneous trends with opposite signs. For this reason, the following analysis focuses on the spatial distribution of ISOA trends and their key driving factors at the regional scale.</p>
      <p id="d2e3898">The spatial distribution of long-term trends confirms that the weak national-mean change in surface ISOA is largely caused by strong regional contrasts with opposite signs (Fig. 6d). The simulations show that the strongest increasing trend is found in Southwest China (SWC) (Fig. 6d), where the annual mean surface ISOA concentration increases significantly by 218.01 ng m<sup>−3</sup> per 20 years, corresponding to an increase of 25.27 % per 20 years (Fig. 7a). In contrast, the strongest decreasing trend occurs in the Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia region (SGN) (Fig. 6d), where the annual mean surface ISOA concentration decreases significantly by 142.21 ng m<sup>−3</sup> per 20 years, corresponding to a decline of 41.87 % per 20 years (Fig. 7a). As these two regions represent the opposite extremes of the national trend pattern, we focus on them in the following analysis to investigate their ISOA changes and the differences in the dominant controlling factors.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3928">Regression-based attribution of long-term ISOA trends in Southwest China (SWC) and the Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia region (SGN). The regression is based on deseasonalized monthly anomalies from the simulation years, and the resulting sensitivity coefficients are combined with the changes in individual drivers over 2000–2019 to estimate their contributions to the long-term ISOA trend. For each driver, the table lists its 20-year change (d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per 20 years), regression sensitivity coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), significance level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), attributed contribution to the ISOA trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per 20 years), and relative contribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; %). Bold values indicate the largest relative contributions in each region.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">Driver</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1">Southwest China (SWC) </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col11" align="center">Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia region (SGN) </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(%)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISOP emis</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.028</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4074</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.001</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">112.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>58.29</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.005</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1618</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.043</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8.622</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.480</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(g m<sup>−2</sup> per month)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.529</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48.53</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.126</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>74.18</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>38.56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.525</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">23.94</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.049</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>84.38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><bold>63.37</bold></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Anthro NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emis</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.033</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1006</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.632</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.86</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.081</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>553.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.271</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45.25</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">33.98</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(g m<sup>−2</sup> per month)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AeroWater (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.004</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.188</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.622</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.387</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.320</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.834</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.997</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.554</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5.658</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.250</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">log<sub>10</sub>(H<sup>+</sup>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.109</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39.70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.901</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.336</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.250</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">46.48</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.618</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.715</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.540</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4643">It is noteworthy that, despite broadly similar temporal trends in the key controlling factors over the two regions, surface ISOA exhibits opposite long-term changes. As shown in Fig. 7a, ISOA increases in SWC but decreases in SGN. The controlling variables generally evolve in similar directions in both regions, although the magnitudes of their changes differ. In the SWC region, surface ISOA exhibits a significant increasing trend (Fig. 6d), and the increases among individual ISOA subspecies are broadly comparable (Fig. 7a). This enhancement is consistent with signals of regional climate change. Regional temperature increases by 0.24 % per 20 years and is accompanied by a pronounced increase in biogenic isoprene emissions of 13.01 % per 20 years (Figs. 6a, 7b). At the same time, anthropogenic SO<sub>2</sub> emissions decrease by 84.84 % per 20 years (Figs. 6b, 7b), accompanied by a corresponding decline in sulfate of 24.98 % per 20 years (Figs. 6e, 7b). Aerosol liquid water also shows a slight decrease of 3.17 % per 20 years (Figs. 6f, 7b). These results indicate that, in SWC, the increase in isoprene emissions offsets the adverse influence of declining reaction-medium levels. As a result, surface ISOA still shows a marked increase. In contrast, the substantial decrease in ISOA over SGN mainly results from reductions in products formed through the IEPOX pathway (Figs. 7a, S4). AIETET and AIEOSN decrease by 127.63 ng m<sup>−3</sup> per 20 years and 9.83 ng m<sup>−3</sup> per 20 years, respectively. This decreasing trend is consistent with the emission-reduction signal associated with anthropogenic pollution-control measures. Following the implementation of these policies, anthropogenic SO<sub>2</sub> emissions decreased by 63.14 % per 20 years (Figs. 6b, 7b), leading to a parallel decrease in sulfate of 51.22 % per 20 years (Figs. 6e, 7b). Aerosol liquid water, an important component of the reaction medium, also declines by 11.74 % per 20 years (Figs. 6f, 7b) and further reinforces the downward trend in ISOA. Although biogenic isoprene emissions increase slightly by 4.54 % per 20 years (Figs. 6a, 7b), this increase is insufficient to offset the overall weakening of the reaction medium and the associated formation environment. Consequently, surface ISOA shows a significant decline in SGN. Overall, the small change in the national-mean ISOA trend mainly results from pronounced regional heterogeneity and offsetting trends, and the dominant factors driving ISOA concentration changes differ substantially across regions.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4690">Time series for Southwest China (SWC; left column) and the Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia region (SGN; right column), showing <bold>(a)</bold> normalized surface isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol (ISOA) subspecies concentrations, including AIETET (dark blue), AIEOSN (gray-purple), AHMGA (rose red), and AHMOSN (earthy yellow). The normalized values are calculated as the ratio of the value in each year to that in 2000; <bold>(b)</bold> anthropogenic sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) emissions (tan; left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: Tg) and anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>) emissions (purple; left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: Tg), and biogenic isoprene emissions (blue; right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: Tg); <bold>(c)</bold> surface isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX) concentrations (dark green; left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: ppb) and surface hydroxymethyl-methyl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-lactone plus methacrylic acid epoxide (HMML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAE) concentrations (yellow; right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: ppb); and <bold>(d)</bold> surface sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations (red-orange; left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and surface aerosol liquid water (AeroWater) concentrations (blue-gray; right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; unit: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4850">To quantitatively diagnose the contributions of influential factors and better understand why ISOA trends differ between SWC and SGN, we constructed a multiple linear regression framework linking simulated monthly ISOA concentrations to key controlling factors. This regression framework was used in two complementary ways. Both analyses were based on regional monthly anomalies derived by first spatially averaging the original monthly gridded data over SWC and SGN to obtain regional-mean monthly time series and then removing the mean seasonal cycle. First, these monthly anomalies were standardized to zero mean and unit standard deviation to compare the relative statistical importance of different predictors on a common scale, as summarized in Sect. S1 and Table S1. This standardized analysis primarily diagnoses the leading predictors of month-to-month ISOA variability. Second, for the trend attribution diagnostic presented in Table 1, we used the same monthly anomalies without standardization, retaining the original physical units of each predictor. Multiple linear regression was subsequently applied to these unstandardized anomalies to obtain sensitivity coefficients in physical units. These sensitivity coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) describe how regional ISOA responds to changes in each predictor under the regression framework. For each predictor, its contribution to the simulated 20-year ISOA trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per 20 years) was then estimated by multiplying its regression sensitivity by its own 20-year trend (d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per 20 years). The relative contribution of each factor was further expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (%), where d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the simulated 20-year ISOA trend in the corresponding region. The results show that the long-term increase in ISOA in SWC is most strongly associated with increasing biogenic isoprene emissions, resulting in an ISOA increase of 112.1 ng m<sup>−3</sup> over 20 years, which corresponds to 58.29 % of the total ISOA trend (Table 1). Sulfate has a positive sensitivity coefficient, but its concentration decreases over the study period, leading to a negative regression-based ISOA contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>74.18 ng m<sup>−3</sup> over 20 years, which offsets the positive ISOA trend in SWC by 38.56 %. In contrast, increasing anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions are associated with a positive ISOA contribution of 32.86 ng m<sup>−3</sup> over 20 years, although the corresponding regression coefficient is not statistically significant. Contributions from aerosol liquid water and log<sub>10</sub>(H<sup>+</sup>) are relatively small, with regression-based ISOA changes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.39 and 4.34 ng m<sup>−3</sup> over 20 years, respectively (Table 1). In SGN, the long-term decrease in ISOA is mainly associated with declining sulfate, which contributes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>84.38 ng m<sup>−3</sup> over 20 years and accounts for 63.37 % of the total ISOA decrease (Table 1). Despite increasing over the study period, anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions are associated with an additional negative regression-based ISOA contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45.25 ng m<sup>−3</sup> over 20 years, corresponding to 33.98 % of the total ISOA decrease, although this coefficient is not statistically significant and should therefore be interpreted cautiously. By comparison, increasing biogenic isoprene emissions partly offset the regional ISOA decline, resulting in a regression-based ISOA increase of 8.62 ng m<sup>−3</sup> over 20 years, which offsets the total ISOA decrease by 6.48 %. Aerosol liquid water also slightly offsets the ISOA decline, with a regression-based contribution of 5.66 ng m<sup>−3</sup> over 20 years, corresponding to an offset of 4.25 %, whereas log<sub>10</sub>(H<sup>+</sup>) contributes only weakly to the decrease, with a contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.72 ng m<sup>−3</sup> over 20 years (Table 1). We further evaluated potential predictor correlations and collinearity by calculating pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients among the predictors used in the regression analysis (Fig. S9). The results indicate that some predictors are not fully independent. In both SWC and SGN, sulfate, aerosol liquid water, and log<sub>10</sub>(H<sup>+</sup>) show moderate to strong positive correlations, with correlation coefficients of 0.70–0.81 in SWC and 0.75–0.88 in SGN. These correlations are physically expected because aerosol liquid water is thermodynamically calculated in MOSAIC based on inorganic aerosol composition, including sulfate, as well as meteorological conditions. Sulfate also contributes to aerosol acidity and aerosol liquid water formation, while aerosol liquid water can further influence aqueous-phase uptake and processing. Therefore, sulfate, aerosol liquid water, and aerosol acidity are treated here as physically connected components of the aerosol chemical environment. Accordingly, the regression-based relative contributions associated with these covarying predictors should be interpreted as diagnostic indicators of statistical associations with ISOA variability, rather than as a strict decomposition of independent causal effects, because they may partly reflect coupled variations among sulfate, aerosol liquid water, and aerosol acidity. This caveat is less important for biogenic isoprene emissions and anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions, as both predictors show weak correlations with the other predictors in both regions. Overall, these results suggest that the leading statistical predictors of long-term ISOA change differ between the two regions. The ISOA increase in SWC is primarily associated with enhanced biogenic isoprene emissions, while the ISOA decrease in SGN is most strongly associated with declining sulfate.</p>
      <p id="d2e5124">We also examined the interannual evolution of the four major ISOA subspecies in SWC and SGN over 2000–2019, and the detailed results are presented in Fig. 8. The two regions show clearly different interannual changes in ISOA subspecies, consistent with the contrasting regional ISOA trends discussed above. In SWC, all four ISOA subspecies increased from 2000 to 2006 (Fig. 8a). This increase is consistent with the simultaneous increases in biogenic isoprene emissions (Fig. 8b), epoxide precursor concentrations (Fig. 8c), and particle-phase reaction conditions, including sulfate and aerosol liquid water (Fig. 8d), during the same period. After 2006, most ISOA subspecies generally decrease toward 2016, whereas AHMGA shows a delayed maximum in 2012, mainly attributable to enhanced anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions and HMML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAE precursor concentrations, together with the peak in aerosol liquid water that favors H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated heterogeneous uptake. This is followed by a rebound in the normalized values of all four ISOA subspecies from 2016 to 2019 (Fig. 8a). Notably, this rebound occurs despite the continued decreases in anthropogenic SO<sub>2</sub> emissions, sulfate, and aerosol liquid water after 2012, suggesting that precursor supply and epoxide precursor concentrations play a stronger role in driving the later-stage ISOA recovery in SWC. This feature is also consistent with the multiple linear regression results discussed above, which identify biogenic isoprene emissions as the leading statistical indicator of ISOA variability and long-term changes in SWC. In contrast, ISOA subspecies in SGN generally peak in 2006 and decline thereafter, showing a more synchronous temporal evolution across different product classes. This decline in ISOA subspecies after 2006 occurs even though biogenic isoprene emissions and gas-phase epoxide precursor concentrations increase over the same period, suggesting that declining sulfate and aerosol liquid water can constrain heterogeneous uptake and particle-phase product formation in SGN. These patterns suggest that the temporal evolution in SGN is more strongly linked to changes in the aerosol reaction medium. This interpretation is also consistent with the multiple linear regression results discussed above, which identify sulfate as the leading statistical indicator and the dominant regression-based contributor to the long-term ISOA decrease in SGN. These regional differences indicate that the mechanisms governing ISOA changes are not spatially uniform and provide additional process-based support for the contrasting ISOA trends identified in SWC and SGN.</p>
      <p id="d2e5161">Taken together, the contrasting ISOA trends in SWC and SGN highlight the need for a coupled precursor-multiphase reaction framework. The SWC case represents a more precursor-driven regime, in which enhanced biogenic isoprene emissions and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-dependent oxidation promote epoxide precursor formation and enhance ISOA production despite less favorable aerosol multiphase reaction conditions. In contrast, the SGN case represents a more reaction-medium-limited regime, in which declining sulfate and aerosol liquid water suppress heterogeneous uptake and particle-phase product formation, even when precursor supply remains relatively high. This regime-based interpretation emphasizes the balance between precursor supply, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-dependent oxidation chemistry, and aerosol multiphase reaction conditions, as summarized schematically in Fig. 9.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e5184">Schematic illustration of contrasting regional controls on surface isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol (ISOA) formation in Southwest China (SWC; left) and the Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia region (SGN; right). The background scenes and selected graphical elements were created with the assistance of OpenAI's image-generation tools in ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2026).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11967/2026/acp-26-11967-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and Discussions</title>
      <p id="d2e5202">This study implements an explicit ISOA formation mechanism in CAM6-Chem that introduces representations of high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> epoxide precursors and their heterogeneous uptake, while resolving reactive-uptake-derived ISOA into H<sub>2</sub>O-mediated nucleophilic addition and inorganic-nucleophile-addition product classes. Evaluation against ground-based observations shows that the explicit ISOA mechanism better reproduces the concentrations and compositional structure of major ISOA subspecies, although positive biases remain for AIETET and AHMGA. At the bulk aerosol level, this mechanism substantially alleviates the underestimation of SOA and OA over China, with the NMB improving from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76.7 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>51.6 % for SOA and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47.0 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.7 % for OA. In addition, the explicit simulation better captures the observed multi-component nature of ambient ISOA and better reproduces the relative contributions of subspecies associated with the newly introduced pathways. These results demonstrate that the explicit ISOA mechanism is chemically meaningful and improves the model's ability to represent both the magnitude and composition of ambient ISOA.</p>
      <p id="d2e5252">Using this explicit ISOA framework, we find that ISOA formation in China reflects competition between the IEPOX pathway and the HMML/MAE pathway under different NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> backgrounds. On the national average, the IEPOX pathway remains the dominant source of ISOA, with an annual mean ISOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HMML</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IEPOX</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of only about 0.07. The relative importance of the HMML/MAE pathway increases in NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-rich regions and during late summer to early autumn, but it remains secondary to IEPOX even under these conditions. Overall, these results indicate that NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> enhances the contribution of the HMML/MAE pathway regionally and seasonally, while the IEPOX pathway continues to dominate ISOA formation at the national scale.</p>
      <p id="d2e5304">Against this national-scale background, spatial analysis showed that the long-term national-mean change in surface ISOA over China during 2000–2019 was weak, largely because strong regional trends with opposite signs offset each other. The most pronounced increase occurred in SWC, whereas the strongest decrease occurred in SGN. Regression-based attribution further showed that the ISOA increase in SWC was most strongly associated with enhanced biogenic isoprene emissions, while the ISOA decrease in SGN was mainly associated with declining sulfate. These contrasts were also reflected in the normalized interannual evolution of major ISOA subspecies. In SWC, the normalized values of all four ISOA subspecies rebounded from 2016 to 2019 despite the post-2012 decreases in sulfate and aerosol liquid water, suggesting an important role of precursor supply. In SGN, by contrast, ISOA subspecies generally peaked in 2006 and declined thereafter, even though biogenic isoprene emissions and gas-phase epoxide precursor concentrations increased after 2006, highlighting the stronger constraint from weakened aerosol multiphase reaction conditions. Together, these results demonstrate that long-term ISOA changes in China are governed by different regional balances between precursor availability and aerosol multiphase reaction conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e5307">Future model development should further address several simplifying assumptions in the current epoxide reactive uptake parameterization. As described in Sect. 2.1.2, the model follows a core-shell treatment in which the organic shell and aqueous core are assumed to have the same reaction rate coefficient. Because phase separation and increased organic-shell viscosity can limit epoxide diffusion and reactive uptake, this assumption may overestimate epoxide-derived ISOA under strongly phase-separated or highly viscous conditions (Zhang et al., 2019; Schmedding et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2024b; Farrell et al., 2025). HMML and MAE are also represented using the same solubility, diffusivity, and condensed-phase reaction parameters as IEPOX because compound-specific laboratory constraints remain limited. This IEPOX-like treatment introduces uncertainty in the absolute uptake rates of high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> epoxides and in the quantitative ISOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HMML</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ISOA</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IEPOX</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. The assumptions of 100 % ISOA yield from epoxide reactive uptake and non-volatile epoxide-derived ISOA introduce additional uncertainty, although they are consistent with previous global ISOA modeling studies (Marais et al., 2016; Jo et al., 2019, 2021). Lower effective yields or partial volatility, especially for products such as 2-MT and 2-MG, could reduce simulated ISOA concentrations and their sensitivity to sulfate, aerosol liquid water, and acidity. Consistent with this need, gas–particle partitioning treatments for 2-MT in regional models suggest a useful direction for future improvement in global models (Pye et al., 2018; Shrivastava et al., 2022). Finally, the removal of ISOA formation from the VBS scheme may also remove important non-epoxide contributions to ISOA that were previously represented implicitly, such as multifunctional organic peroxides under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions and organic nitrates under high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions (Paulot et al., 2009a; Schwantes et al., 2019). Taken together, these assumptions mean that the long-term trends and regression-based attributions diagnosed here should be interpreted within the adopted epoxide-focused chemical framework, rather than as exact causal contributions independent of model structure and parameterization.</p>
      <p id="d2e5360">Beyond the uncertainties associated with parameterizations already included in the current framework, some potentially important ISOA processes remain absent from the model. These include isoprene cloud-water chemistry, which may provide an additional ISOA source and influence simulated aerosol composition, and photolytic loss, since ISOA may photolyze faster than monoterpene-derived SOA (Zawadowicz et al., 2020), thereby affecting its simulated lifetime and burden. Incorporating these missing formation and loss processes, together with more composition-resolved observations to constrain pathway-specific chemistry, will be important for future model refinement. Future global-scale simulations and attribution analyses would also be useful for evaluating whether the updated ISOA mechanism has broader implications for other high-isoprene regions, where climate change and human activities may shift the relative roles of biogenic precursor supply, anthropogenic emissions, and the heterogeneous aerosol reaction environment in shaping future ISOA responses.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5368">The Community Earth System Model (CESM) is an open-source framework available at <uri>https://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/download</uri> (last access: 10 May 2024). The modified code for the explicit isoprene chemistry scheme implemented in this study is available upon reasonable request. Ground-based measurements for OA and SOA were obtained from the Supplement of published articles by Miao et al. (2021) and Chen et al. (2024a). Ground-based measurements of AIETET and AHMGA were obtained from Ding et al. (2016). Ground-based measurements of ISOA products used to evaluate ISOA composition and pathway partitioning were obtained from Zhang et al. (2022).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5374">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11967-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11967-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5383">XD, MW, and WZ designed the study. WZ developed the model code, performed the simulations, produced the figures, and wrote the manuscript draft. MY and XS contributed to the model simulations. All the authors contributed to the discussion and editing of the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5389">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5398">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5404">We appreciate the High Performance Computing Center of Nanjing University for providing the computational resources essential for this research. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and constructive suggestions, which helped improve the quality of the paper. The background scenes and selected graphical elements in Fig. 9 were created with the assistance of OpenAI's image-generation tools in ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2026).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5409">This work acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42575126 and 42505184) and the Collaborative Innovation Center of Climate Change, Jiangsu Province.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5415">This paper was edited by Jason Surratt and reviewed by five anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Bardakov, R., Thornton, J. A., Riipinen, I., Krejci, R., and Ekman, A. M. L.: Transport and chemistry of isoprene and its oxidation products in deep convective clouds, Tellus B, 73, 1979856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2021.1979856" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/16000889.2021.1979856</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Birdsall, A. W., Miner, C. R., Mael, L. E., and Elrod, M. J.: Mechanistic study of secondary organic aerosol components formed from nucleophilic addition reactions of methacrylic acid epoxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12951–12964, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12951-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12951-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Li, X., Bairai, S. T., Renfro, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y. J., McKinney, K. A., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Mueller, S., Knote, C., Shaw, S. L., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Examining the effects of anthropogenic emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee ground site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8871–8888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Nenes, A., Carlton, A. G., Surratt, J. D., McNeill, V. F., and Pye, H. O. T.: Simulating aqueous-phase isoprene-epoxydiol (IEPOX) secondary organic aerosol production during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS), Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5026–5034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05750" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b05750</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4987–5005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Carlton, A. G., Bhave, P. V., Napelenok, S. L., Edney, E. O., Sarwar, G., Pinder, R. W., Pouliot, G. A., and Houyoux, M.: Model representation of secondary organic aerosol in CMAQv4.7, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8553–8560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es100636q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es100636q</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chang, X., Zhao, B., Zheng, H., Wang, S., Cai, S., Guo, F., Gui, P., Huang, G., Wu, D., Han, L., Xing, J., Man, H., Hu, R., Liang, C., Xu, Q., Qiu, X., Ding, D., Liu, K., Han, R., Robinson, A. L., and Donahue, N. M.: Full-volatility emission framework corrects missing and underestimated secondary organic aerosol sources, One Earth, 5, 403–412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.03.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.oneear.2022.03.015</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Miao, R., Geng, G., Shrivastava, M., Dao, X., Xu, B., Sun, J., Zhang, X., Liu, M., Tang, G., Tang, Q., Hu, H., Huang, R.-J., Wang, H., Zheng, Y., Qin, Y., Guo, S., Hu, M., and Zhu, T.: Widespread 2013–2020 decreases and reduction challenges of organic aerosol in China, Nat. Commun., 15, 4465, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48902-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-024-48902-0</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Lambe, A. T., Xu, R., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Zhang, Z., Szalkowski, T., Cui, T., Vizuete, W., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P., Chan, M. N., and Surratt, J. D.: Heterogeneous hydroxyl radical oxidation of isoprene-epoxydiol-derived methyltetrol sulfates: plausible formation mechanisms of previously unexplained organosulfates in ambient fine aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 7, 460–468, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00276</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Ng, A. E., Green, J., Zhang, Y., Riva, M., Riedel, T. P., Pye, H. O. T., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Cooke, M. E., Zhang, Z., Vizuete, W., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Applying a Phase-Separation Parameterization in Modeling Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Acid-Driven Reactive Uptake of Isoprene Epoxydiols under Humid Conditions, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 1, 511–524, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsestair.4c00002</ext-link>, 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B. N., Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Logan, J. A., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.: Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chung, S. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global distribution and climate forcing of carbonaceous aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001397" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001397</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Cooke, M. E., Armstrong, N. C., Fankhauser, A. M., Chen, Y., Lei, Z., Zhang, Y., Ledsky, I. R., Turpin, B. J., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., McNeill, V. F., Surratt, J. D., and Ault, A. P.: Decreases in epoxide-driven secondary organic aerosol production under highly acidic conditions: the importance of acid–base equilibria, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 10675–10684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c10851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.3c10851</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Darer, A. I., Cole-Filipiak, N. C., O'Connor, A. E., and Elrod, M. J.: Formation and stability of atmospherically relevant isoprene-derived organosulfates and organonitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1895–1902, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103797z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es103797z</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., He, Q.-F., Shen, R.-Q., Yu, Q.-Q., and Wang, X.-M.: Spatial distributions of secondary organic aerosols from isoprene, monoterpenes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene, and aromatics over China during summer: secondary organic aerosols over China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 11877–11891, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021748" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021748</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., He, Q.-F., Shen, R.-Q., Yu, Q.-Q., Zhang, Y.-Q., Xin, J.-Y., Wen, T.-X., and Wang, X.-M.: Spatial and seasonal variations of isoprene secondary organic aerosol in China: Significant impact of biomass burning during winter, Sci. Rep., 6, 20411, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20411" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep20411</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052297c</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Dong, X., Liu, Y., Li, X., Yue, M., Liu, Y., Ma, Z., Zheng, H., Huang, R., and Wang, M.: Modeling Analysis of Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol Dependence on Anthropogenic Emissions in China, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 9, 286–292, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00104</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Eddingsaas, N. C., VanderVelde, D. G., and Wennberg, P. O.: Kinetics and Products of the Acid-Catalyzed Ring-Opening of Atmospherically Relevant Butyl Epoxy Alcohols, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 8106–8113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103907c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp103907c</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Emmons, L. K., Schwantes, R. H., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G., Kinnison, D., Lamarque, J., Marsh, D., Mills, M. J., Tilmes, S., Bardeen, C., Buchholz, R. R., Conley, A., Gettelman, A., Garcia, R., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., and Pétron, G.: The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2019MS001882, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001882" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001882</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Fahey, K. M., Carlton, A. G., Pye, H. O. T., Baek, J., Hutzell, W. T., Stanier, C. O., Baker, K. R., Appel, K. W., Jaoui, M., and Offenberg, J. H.: A framework for expanding aqueous chemistry in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1587–1605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1587-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-1587-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Farrell, S. L., Rasool, Q. Z., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, C.-T., Zhang, H., Schmedding, R., Shiraiwa, M., Greene, J., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Jimenez, J. L., Hu, W., Surratt, J. D., and Vizuete, W.: Simulated reductions in Heterogeneous Isoprene Epoxydiol Reactive Uptake from aerosol morphology in the contiguous United States using the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQv5.3.2), EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2253" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2025-2253</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Frauenheim, M., Offenberg, J., Zhang, Z., Surratt, J. D., and Gold, A.: The C<sub>5</sub>–alkene triol conundrum: structural characterization and quantitation of isoprene-derived C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>3</sub> reactive uptake products, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 9, 829–836, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00548" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00548</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Frauenheim, M., Offenberg, J., Zhang, Z., Surratt, J. D., and Gold, A.: Chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol formed from the oxidation of semivolatile isoprene epoxydiol isomerization products, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 22571–22582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c06850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.4c06850</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Gaston, C. J., Thornton, J. A., and Ng, N. L.: Reactive uptake of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> to internally mixed inorganic and organic particles: the role of organic carbon oxidation state and inferred organic phase separations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5693–5707, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5693-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5693-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., Da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A. and Morrison, H.: Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part I: Off-Line Tests and Comparison with Other Schemes, J. Climate, 28, 1268–1287, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Griffin, R. J., Cocker III, D. R., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organic aerosol formation from the oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 3555–3567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998JD100049</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>He, Q.-F., Ding, X., Fu, X.-X., Zhang, Y.-Q., Wang, J.-Q., Liu, Y.-X., Tang, M.-J., Wang, X.-M., and Rudich, Y.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene epoxides in the Pearl River Delta, South China: IEPOX- and HMML-derived tracers, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6999–7012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028242" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JD028242</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Al-Naiema, I. M., Hughes, D. D., Fang, T., and Stone, E. A.: Organosulfates in Atlanta, Georgia: anthropogenic influences on biogenic secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3191–3206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3191-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3191-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hodzic, A., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jo, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Madronich, S., and Park, R. J.: Rethinking the global secondary organic aerosol (SOA) budget: stronger production, faster removal, shorter lifetime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7917–7941, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7917-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7917-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hu, H., Liang, Y., Li, T., She, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, T., Zhou, M., Li, Z., Li, C., Xiao, H., Hu, J., Li, J., and Zhao, Y.: Pathway-specific responses of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation to anthropogenic emission reductions in a megacity in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 17889–17906, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17889-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-17889-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Krechmer, J. E., Peng, Z., de Sá, S. S., Martin, S. T., Alexander, M. L., Baumann, K., Hacker, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Koss, A. R., de Gouw, J. A., Goldstein, A. H., Seco, R., Sjostedt, S. J., Park, J.-H., Guenther, A. B., Kim, S., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: Volatility and lifetime against OH heterogeneous reaction of ambient isoprene-epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11563–11580, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11563-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11563-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Krechmer, J. E., Chen, Q., Kuwata, M., Liu, Y. J., de Sá, S. S., McKinney, K., Martin, S. T., Hu, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M., Surratt, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Isaacman-Van Wertz, G., Yee, L. D., Goldstein, A. H., Carbone, S., Brito, J., Artaxo, P., de Gouw, J. A., Koss, A., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Karl, T., Kaser, L., Jud, W., Hansel, A., Docherty, K. S., Alexander, M. L., Robinson, N. H., Coe, H., Allan, J. D., Canagaratna, M. R., Paulot, F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of a real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11807–11833, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Jo, D. S., Hodzic, A., Emmons, L. K., Marais, E. A., Peng, Z., Nault, B. A., Hu, W., Campuzano-Jost, P., and Jimenez, J. L.: A simplified parameterization of isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) for global chemistry and climate models: a case study with GEOS-Chem v11-02-rc, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2983–3000, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2983-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-2983-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Jo, D. S., Hodzic, A., Emmons, L. K., Tilmes, S., Schwantes, R. H., Mills, M. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Hu, W., Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Singh, B., Lu, Z., Schulz, C., Schneider, J., Shilling, J. E., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Future changes in isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX SOA) under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: the importance of physicochemical dependency, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3395–3425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Travis, K., Yu, K., Zhu, L., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., Hair, J. W., Fenn, M. A., Butler, C. F., Wagner, N. L., Gordon, T. D., Welti, A., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Teng, A. P., Millet, D. B., Schwarz, J. P., Markovic, M. Z., and Perring, A. E.: Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10411–10433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Wang, G., Wu, C., Cao, C., Ren, Y., Wang, J., Li, J., Cao, J., Zeng, L., and Zhu, T.: Characterization of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosols at a rural site in North China Plain with implications for anthropogenic pollution effects, Sci. Rep., 8, 535, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18983-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-18983-7</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Li, M., Liu, H., Geng, G., Hong, C., Liu, F., Song, Y., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Cui, H., Man, H., Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Anthropogenic emission inventories in China: a review, Natl. Sci. Rev., 4, 834–866, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nwx150</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, Z., Docherty, K. S., Zhang, H., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Rubitschun, C. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Edgerton, E. S., Kleindienst, T. E., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Isoprene Epoxydiols as Precursors to Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation: Acid-Catalyzed Reactive Uptake Studies with Authentic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 250–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202554c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es202554c</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, H., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, Z., Marth, W. J., Park, S., Arashiro, M., Cui, T., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Sexton, K. G., Vizuete, W., Xie, Y., Luecken, D. J., Piletic, I. R., Edney, E. O., Bartolotti, L. J., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen oxides, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 6718–6723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221150110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1221150110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Ma, P.-L., Wang, H., Tilmes, S., Singh, B., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 505–522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Dong, X., Emmons, L. K., Jo, D. S., Liu, Y., Shrivastava, M., Yue, M., Liang, Y., Song, Z., He, X., and Wang, M.: Exploring the Factors Controlling the Long‐Term Trend (1988–2019) of Surface Organic Aerosols in the Continental United States by Simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037935" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD037935</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Lu, Z., Liu, X., Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Tilmes, S., Emmons, L. K., Vitt, F., Singh, B., Wang, H., Zhang, R., and Rasch, P. J.: Radiative Forcing of Nitrate Aerosols From 1975 to 2010 as Simulated by MOSAIC Module in CESM2‐MAM4, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034809" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD034809</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Mael, L. E., Jacobs, M. I., and Elrod, M. J.: Organosulfate and nitrate formation and reactivity from epoxides derived from 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4464–4472, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510033s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp510033s</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Hu, W., Krechmer, J., Zhu, L., Kim, P. S., Miller, C. C., Fisher, J. A., Travis, K., Yu, K., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Arkinson, H. L., Pye, H. O. T., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., and McNeill, V. F.: Aqueous-phase mechanism for secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the southeast United States and co-benefit of SO<sub>2</sub> emission controls, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1603–1618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Turner, J. R., and Mickley, L. J.: Evidence of 1991–2013 decrease of biogenic secondary organic aerosol in response to SO<sub>2</sub> emission controls, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 054018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa69c8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aa69c8</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Miao, R., Chen, Q., Shrivastava, M., Chen, Y., Zhang, L., Hu, J., Zheng, Y., and Liao, K.: Process-based and observation-constrained SOA simulations in China: the role of semivolatile and intermediate-volatility organic compounds and OH levels, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16183–16201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16183-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-16183-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Ng, A. E., Chen, Y., Green, J., Farrell, S., Surratt, J. D., Ault, A. P., Turpin, B. J., and Vizuete, W. C.: Regional-scale modeling parameterizations for secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene epoxydiols: experimentally based evaluation and optimization, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 2, 2625–2637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00258" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsestair.5c00258</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X., Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol formation in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp02001h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c5cp02001h</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Odum, J. R., Hoffmann, T., Bowman, F., Collins, D., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas/particle partitioning and secondary organic aerosol yields, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2580–2585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es950943" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es950943</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>OpenAI: ChatGPT image-generation tools, OpenAI, <uri>https://chatgpt.com/</uri> (last access: 2 June 2026), 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Paulot, F., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kroll, J. H., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Isoprene photooxidation: new insights into the production of acids and organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1479–1501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1479-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1479-2009</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Paulot, F., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kürten, A., St. Clair, J. M., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Unexpected Epoxide Formation in the Gas-Phase Photooxidation of Isoprene, Science, 325, 730–733, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172910" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1172910</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T. and Seinfeld, J. H.: A global perspective on aerosol from low-volatility organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4377–4401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4377-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4377-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Pinder, R. W., Piletic, I. R., Xie, Y., Capps, S. L., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Luecken, D. J., Hutzell, W. T., Jaoui, M., Offenberg, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., and Edney, E. O.: Epoxide pathways improve model predictions of isoprene markers and reveal key role of acidity in aerosol formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11056–11064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402106h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es402106h</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Zuend, A., Fry, J. L., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Capps, S. L., Appel, K. W., Foroutan, H., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., and Goldstein, A. H.: Coupling of organic and inorganic aerosol systems and the effect on gas–particle partitioning in the southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 357–370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-357-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-357-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Rattanavaraha, W., Chu, K., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M., Lin, Y.-H., Edgerton, E. S., Baumann, K., Shaw, S. L., Guo, H., King, L., Weber, R. J., Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Offenberg, J. H., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Assessing the impact of anthropogenic pollution on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation in PM<sub>2.5</sub> collected from the Birmingham, Alabama, ground site during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4897–4914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4897-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4897-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Riva, M., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Boyer, H. C., Narayan, S., Yee, L. D., Green, H. S., Cui, T., Zhang, Z., Baumann, K., Fort, M., Edgerton, E., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Rose, C. A., Ribeiro, I. O., E Oliveira, R. L., Dos Santos, E. O., Machado, C. M. D., Szopa, S., Zhao, Y., Alves, E. G., De Sá, S. S., Hu, W., Knipping, E. M., Shaw, S. L., Duvoisin Junior, S., De Souza, R. A. F., Palm, B. B., Jimenez, J.-L., Glasius, M., Goldstein, A. H., Pye, H. O. T., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Vizuete, W., Martin, S. T., Thornton, J. A., Dutcher, C. S., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Increasing Isoprene Epoxydiol-to-Inorganic Sulfate Aerosol Ratio Results in Extensive Conversion of Inorganic Sulfate to Organosulfur Forms: Implications for Aerosol Physicochemical Properties, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 8682–8694, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b01019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage, A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.: Rethinking organic aerosols: semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging, Science, 315, 1259–1262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1133061</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Royer, H. M., Harrill, A. J., Christensen, C. M., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Ault, A. P., Surratt, J. D., and Turpin, B. J.: 2-Methyltetrol sulfate oxidation by hydroxyl radical in atmospheric water mimics and implications for the fate of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 3, 806–815, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00406" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsestair.5c00406</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Schmedding, R., Ma, M., Zhang, Y., Farrell, S., Pye, H. O. T., Chen, Y., Wang, C., Rasool, Q. Z., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Ault, A. P., Surratt, J. D., and Vizuete, W.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene-Derived organic coatings on acidic sulfate aerosol impacts secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene in a box model, Atmos. Environ., 213, 456–462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.005</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Schmedding, R., Rasool, Q. Z., Zhang, Y., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Surratt, J. D., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Thornton, J. A., Goldstein, A. H., and Vizuete, W.: Predicting secondary organic aerosol phase state and viscosity and its effect on multiphase chemistry in a regional-scale air quality model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8201–8225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8201-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-8201-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Schwantes, R. H., Charan, S. M., Bates, K. H., Huang, Y., Nguyen, T. B., Mai, H., Kong, W., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Low-volatility compounds contribute significantly to isoprene secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7255–7278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7255-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7255-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Schwantes, R. H., Emmons, L. K., Orlando, J. J., Barth, M. C., Tyndall, G. S., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., St. Clair, J. M., Blake, D. R., Wisthaler, A., and Bui, T. P. V.: Comprehensive isoprene and terpene gas-phase chemistry improves simulated surface ozone in the southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3739–3776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Berg, L. K., Brito, J., Ching, J., Easter, R. C., Fan, J., Fast, J. D., Feng, Z., Fuentes, J. D., Glasius, M., Goldstein, A. H., Alves, E. G., Gomes, H., Gu, D., Guenther, A., Jathar, S. H., Kim, S., Liu, Y., Lou, S., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Medeiros, A., De Sá, S. S., Shilling, J. E., Springston, S. R., Souza, R. A. F., Thornton, J. A., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Yee, L. D., Ynoue, R., Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhao, C.: Urban pollution greatly enhances formation of natural aerosols over the Amazon rainforest, Nat. Commun., 10, 1046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08909-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-08909-4</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Rasool, Q. Z., Zhao, B., Octaviani, M., Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., Gaudet, B., Liu, Y., Shilling, J. E., Schneider, J., Schulz, C., Zöger, M., Martin, S. T., Ye, J., Guenther, A., Souza, R. F., Wendisch, M., and Pöschl, U.: Tight Coupling of Surface and In-Plant Biochemistry and Convection Governs Key Fine Particulate Components over the Amazon Rainforest, ACS Earth Space Chem., 6, 380–390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00356</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Silver, B., Conibear, L., Reddington, C. L., Knote, C., Arnold, S. R., and Spracklen, D. V.: Pollutant emission reductions deliver decreased PM<sub>2.5</sub>-caused mortality across China during 2015–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11683–11695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11683-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11683-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Stadtler, S., Kühn, T., Schröder, S., Taraborrelli, D., Schultz, M. G., and Kokkola, H.: Isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in the global aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0–HAM2.3–MOZ1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3235–3260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Su, S., Li, B., Cui, S., and Tao, S.: Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Combustion in China: From 1990 to 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 8403–8410, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es201656f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es201656f</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Kroll, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Claeys, M., Sorooshian, A., Ng, N. L., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Evidence for Organosulfates in Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 517–527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062081q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es062081q</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R., Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organosulfate Formation in Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 8345–8378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp802310p</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M., Loza, C. L., Kwan, A. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6640–6645, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0911114107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Tilmes, S., Hodzic, A., Emmons, L. K., Mills, M. J., Gettelman, A., Kinnison, D. E., Park, M., Lamarque, J.-F., Vitt, F., Shrivastava, M., Campuzano‐Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., and Liu, X.: Climate Forcing and Trends of Organic Aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 4323–4351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001827</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Wennberg, P. O., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Dodson, L. G., McVay, R. C., Mertens, L. A., Nguyen, T. B., Praske, E., Schwantes, R. H., Smarte, M. D., St Clair, J. M., Teng, A. P., Zhang, X., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas-Phase Reactions of Isoprene and Its Major Oxidation Products, Chem. Rev., 118, 3337–3390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Worton, D. R., Surratt, J. D., LaFranchi, B. W., Chan, A. W. H., Zhao, Y., Weber, R. J., Park, J.-H., Gilman, J. B., De Gouw, J., Park, C., Schade, G., Beaver, M., St. Clair, J. M., Crounse, J., Wennberg, P., Wolfe, G. M., Harrold, S., Thornton, J. A., Farmer, D. K., Docherty, K. S., Cubison, M. J., Jimenez, J.-L., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Kristensen, K., Glasius, M., Mao, J., Ren, X., Brune, W., Browne, E. C., Pusede, S. E., Cohen, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Goldstein, A. H.: Observational Insights into Aerosol Formation from Isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11403–11413, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es4011064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es4011064</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Wu, K., Yang, X., Chen, D., Gu, S., Lu, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, K., Ou, Y., Qian, Y., Shao, P., and Lu, S.: Estimation of biogenic VOC emissions and their corresponding impact on ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation in China, Atmos. Res., 231, 104656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104656" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104656</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Xu, R., Chen, Y., Ng, S. I. M., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P., Surratt, J. D., and Chan, M. N.: Formation of inorganic sulfate and volatile nonsulfated products from heterogeneous hydroxyl radical oxidation of 2-methyltetrol sulfate aerosols: mechanisms and atmospheric implications, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 11, 968–974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00451</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Q., Yuan, Q., Li, T., Shen, H., and Zhang, L.: The relationships between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and meteorological factors in China: seasonal and regional variations, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pu., 14, 1510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121510" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/ijerph14121510</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.: Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC), J. Geophys. Res., 113, 2007JD008782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008782</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Singh, B., Wang, H., Lu, Z., Tilmes, S., Emmons, L. K., Vitt, F., Zhang, R., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Development and Evaluation of Chemistry‐Aerosol‐Climate Model CAM5‐Chem‐MAM7‐MOSAIC: Global Atmospheric Distribution and Radiative Effects of Nitrate Aerosol, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 13, e2020MS002346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020MS002346</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zawadowicz, M. A., Lee, B. H., Shrivastava, M., Zelenyuk, A., Zaveri, R. A., Flynn, C., Thornton, J. A., and Shilling, J. E.: Photolysis controls atmospheric budgets of biogenic secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 3861–3870, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b07051</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian climate centre general circulation model, Atmos. Ocean, 33, 407–446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539</ext-link>, 1995. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Yue, M., Dong, X., Huang, K., and Wang, M.: Understanding the long-term trend of organic aerosol and the influences from anthropogenic emission and regional climate change in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3857–3872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3857-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-3857-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lambe, A. T., Olson, N. E., Lei, Z., Craig, R. L., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Gaston, C. J., Thornton, J. A., Vizuete, W., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Effect of the Aerosol-Phase State on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from the Reactive Uptake of Isoprene-Derived Epoxydiols (IEPOX), Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 5, 167–174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Riva, M., Koss, A. R., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Onasch, T. B., Kroll, J. H., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Joint impacts of acidity and viscosity on the formation of secondary organic aerosol from isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX) in phase-separated particles, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 2646–2658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00209</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y.-Q., Ding, X., He, Q.-F., Wen, T.-X., Wang, J.-Q., Yang, K., Jiang, H., Cheng, Q., Liu, P., Wang, Z.-R., He, Y.-F., Hu, W.-W., Wang, Q.-Y., Xin, J.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., and Wang, X.-M.: Observational Insights into Isoprene Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation through the Epoxide Pathway at Three Urban Sites from Northern to Southern China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 4795–4805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06974" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c06974</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, Y., Thornton, J. A., Ng, N. L., Cao, H., Henze, D. K., McDuffie, E. E., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Marais, E. A., Edgerton, E., and Mao, J.: Long-term observational constraints of organic aerosol dependence on inorganic species in the southeast US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13091–13107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13091-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-13091-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, S., Zhang, J., Li, L., Zhou, M., Qiao, L., Wang, H., Huang, D. D., Wang, Q., Jing, S., Wu, Y., Wang, S., Chen, C., Ying, Q., and Yu, J. Z.: Aerosol Uptake Coefficients of Isoprene Epoxides: Determination and Parameter Estimation from Online Field Measurements of Organic Molecular Markers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 18249–18258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c09046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5c09046</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Improved representation of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in CAM6-Chem reveals regional contrasts in its long-term changes over China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bardakov, R., Thornton, J. A., Riipinen, I., Krejci, R., and Ekman, A. M. L.: Transport and chemistry of isoprene and its oxidation products in deep convective clouds, Tellus B, 73, 1979856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2021.1979856" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2021.1979856</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Birdsall, A. W., Miner, C. R., Mael, L. E., and Elrod, M. J.: Mechanistic study of secondary organic aerosol components formed from nucleophilic addition reactions of methacrylic acid epoxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12951–12964, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12951-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12951-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Budisulistiorini, S. H., Li, X., Bairai, S. T., Renfro, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y. J., McKinney, K. A., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Mueller, S., Knote, C., Shaw, S. L., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Examining the effects of anthropogenic emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee ground site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8871–8888, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Budisulistiorini, S. H., Nenes, A., Carlton, A. G., Surratt, J. D., McNeill, V. F., and Pye, H. O. T.: Simulating aqueous-phase isoprene-epoxydiol (IEPOX) secondary organic aerosol production during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS), Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5026–5034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05750" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05750</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4987–5005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carlton, A. G., Bhave, P. V., Napelenok, S. L., Edney, E. O., Sarwar, G., Pinder, R. W., Pouliot, G. A., and Houyoux, M.: Model representation of secondary organic aerosol in CMAQv4.7, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8553–8560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es100636q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es100636q</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, X., Zhao, B., Zheng, H., Wang, S., Cai, S., Guo, F., Gui, P., Huang, G., Wu, D., Han, L., Xing, J., Man, H., Hu, R., Liang, C., Xu, Q., Qiu, X., Ding, D., Liu, K., Han, R., Robinson, A. L., and Donahue, N. M.: Full-volatility emission framework corrects missing and underestimated secondary organic aerosol sources, One Earth, 5, 403–412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.03.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.03.015</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Q., Miao, R., Geng, G., Shrivastava, M., Dao, X., Xu, B., Sun, J., Zhang, X., Liu, M., Tang, G., Tang, Q., Hu, H., Huang, R.-J., Wang, H., Zheng, Y., Qin, Y., Guo, S., Hu, M., and Zhu, T.: Widespread 2013–2020 decreases and reduction challenges of organic aerosol in China, Nat. Commun., 15, 4465, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48902-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48902-0</a>, 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Lambe, A. T., Xu, R., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Zhang, Z., Szalkowski, T., Cui, T., Vizuete, W., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P., Chan, M. N., and Surratt, J. D.: Heterogeneous hydroxyl radical oxidation of isoprene-epoxydiol-derived methyltetrol sulfates: plausible formation mechanisms of previously unexplained organosulfates in ambient fine aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 7, 460–468, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00276</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Y., Ng, A. E., Green, J., Zhang, Y., Riva, M., Riedel, T. P., Pye, H. O. T., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Cooke, M. E., Zhang, Z., Vizuete, W., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Applying a Phase-Separation Parameterization in Modeling Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Acid-Driven Reactive Uptake of Isoprene Epoxydiols under Humid Conditions, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 1, 511–524, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00002</a>, 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B. N., Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Logan, J. A., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.: Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chung, S. H. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global distribution and climate forcing of carbonaceous aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001397" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001397</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cooke, M. E., Armstrong, N. C., Fankhauser, A. M., Chen, Y., Lei, Z., Zhang, Y., Ledsky, I. R., Turpin, B. J., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., McNeill, V. F., Surratt, J. D., and Ault, A. P.: Decreases in epoxide-driven secondary organic aerosol production under highly acidic conditions: the importance of acid–base equilibria, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 10675–10684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c10851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c10851</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Darer, A. I., Cole-Filipiak, N. C., O'Connor, A. E., and Elrod, M. J.: Formation and stability of atmospherically relevant isoprene-derived organosulfates and organonitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1895–1902, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103797z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es103797z</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, X., He, Q.-F., Shen, R.-Q., Yu, Q.-Q., and Wang, X.-M.: Spatial distributions of secondary organic aerosols from isoprene, monoterpenes, <i>β</i>-caryophyllene, and aromatics over China during summer: secondary organic aerosols over China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 11877–11891, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021748" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021748</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, X., He, Q.-F., Shen, R.-Q., Yu, Q.-Q., Zhang, Y.-Q., Xin, J.-Y., Wen, T.-X., and Wang, X.-M.: Spatial and seasonal variations of isoprene secondary organic aerosol in China: Significant impact of biomass burning during winter, Sci. Rep., 6, 20411, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20411" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20411</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dong, X., Liu, Y., Li, X., Yue, M., Liu, Y., Ma, Z., Zheng, H., Huang, R., and Wang, M.: Modeling Analysis of Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol Dependence on Anthropogenic Emissions in China, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 9, 286–292, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00104</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eddingsaas, N. C., VanderVelde, D. G., and Wennberg, P. O.: Kinetics and Products of the Acid-Catalyzed Ring-Opening of Atmospherically Relevant Butyl Epoxy Alcohols, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 8106–8113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103907c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103907c</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Emmons, L. K., Schwantes, R. H., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G., Kinnison, D., Lamarque, J., Marsh, D., Mills, M. J., Tilmes, S., Bardeen, C., Buchholz, R. R., Conley, A., Gettelman, A., Garcia, R., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., and Pétron, G.: The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2019MS001882, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001882" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001882</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fahey, K. M., Carlton, A. G., Pye, H. O. T., Baek, J., Hutzell, W. T., Stanier, C. O., Baker, K. R., Appel, K. W., Jaoui, M., and Offenberg, J. H.: A framework for expanding aqueous chemistry in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1587–1605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1587-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1587-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Farrell, S. L., Rasool, Q. Z., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, C.-T., Zhang, H., Schmedding, R., Shiraiwa, M., Greene, J., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Jimenez, J. L., Hu, W., Surratt, J. D., and Vizuete, W.: Simulated reductions in Heterogeneous Isoprene Epoxydiol Reactive Uptake from aerosol morphology in the contiguous United States using the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQv5.3.2), EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2253" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2253</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frauenheim, M., Offenberg, J., Zhang, Z., Surratt, J. D., and Gold, A.: The C<sub>5</sub>–alkene triol conundrum: structural characterization and quantitation of isoprene-derived C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>3</sub> reactive uptake products, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 9, 829–836, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00548" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00548</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frauenheim, M., Offenberg, J., Zhang, Z., Surratt, J. D., and Gold, A.: Chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol formed from the oxidation of semivolatile isoprene epoxydiol isomerization products, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 22571–22582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c06850" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c06850</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gaston, C. J., Thornton, J. A., and Ng, N. L.: Reactive uptake of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> to internally mixed inorganic and organic particles: the role of organic carbon oxidation state and inferred organic phase separations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5693–5707, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5693-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5693-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., Da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gettelman, A. and Morrison, H.: Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part I: Off-Line Tests and Comparison with Other Schemes, J. Climate, 28, 1268–1287, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Griffin, R. J., Cocker III, D. R., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organic aerosol formation from the oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 3555–3567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD100049</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Q.-F., Ding, X., Fu, X.-X., Zhang, Y.-Q., Wang, J.-Q., Liu, Y.-X., Tang, M.-J., Wang, X.-M., and Rudich, Y.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene epoxides in the Pearl River Delta, South China: IEPOX- and HMML-derived tracers, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6999–7012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028242" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028242</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Al-Naiema, I. M., Hughes, D. D., Fang, T., and Stone, E. A.: Organosulfates in Atlanta, Georgia: anthropogenic influences on biogenic secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3191–3206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3191-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3191-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hodzic, A., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jo, D. S., Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Madronich, S., and Park, R. J.: Rethinking the global secondary organic aerosol (SOA) budget: stronger production, faster removal, shorter lifetime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7917–7941, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7917-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7917-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, H., Liang, Y., Li, T., She, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, T., Zhou, M., Li, Z., Li, C., Xiao, H., Hu, J., Li, J., and Zhao, Y.: Pathway-specific responses of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation to anthropogenic emission reductions in a megacity in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 17889–17906, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17889-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17889-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, W., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Krechmer, J. E., Peng, Z., de Sá, S. S., Martin, S. T., Alexander, M. L., Baumann, K., Hacker, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Koss, A. R., de Gouw, J. A., Goldstein, A. H., Seco, R., Sjostedt, S. J., Park, J.-H., Guenther, A. B., Kim, S., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Brune, W. H., and Jimenez, J. L.: Volatility and lifetime against OH heterogeneous reaction of ambient isoprene-epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11563–11580, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11563-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11563-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, W. W., Campuzano-Jost, P., Palm, B. B., Day, D. A., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Krechmer, J. E., Chen, Q., Kuwata, M., Liu, Y. J., de Sá, S. S., McKinney, K., Martin, S. T., Hu, M., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M., Surratt, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Isaacman-Van Wertz, G., Yee, L. D., Goldstein, A. H., Carbone, S., Brito, J., Artaxo, P., de Gouw, J. A., Koss, A., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Karl, T., Kaser, L., Jud, W., Hansel, A., Docherty, K. S., Alexander, M. L., Robinson, N. H., Coe, H., Allan, J. D., Canagaratna, M. R., Paulot, F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of a real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11807–11833, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jo, D. S., Hodzic, A., Emmons, L. K., Marais, E. A., Peng, Z., Nault, B. A., Hu, W., Campuzano-Jost, P., and Jimenez, J. L.: A simplified parameterization of isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) for global chemistry and climate models: a case study with GEOS-Chem v11-02-rc, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2983–3000, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2983-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2983-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jo, D. S., Hodzic, A., Emmons, L. K., Tilmes, S., Schwantes, R. H., Mills, M. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Hu, W., Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Singh, B., Lu, Z., Schulz, C., Schneider, J., Shilling, J. E., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Future changes in isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX SOA) under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: the importance of physicochemical dependency, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3395–3425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Travis, K., Yu, K., Zhu, L., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., Hair, J. W., Fenn, M. A., Butler, C. F., Wagner, N. L., Gordon, T. D., Welti, A., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Teng, A. P., Millet, D. B., Schwarz, J. P., Markovic, M. Z., and Perring, A. E.: Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10411–10433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Wang, G., Wu, C., Cao, C., Ren, Y., Wang, J., Li, J., Cao, J., Zeng, L., and Zhu, T.: Characterization of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosols at a rural site in North China Plain with implications for anthropogenic pollution effects, Sci. Rep., 8, 535, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18983-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18983-7</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, M., Liu, H., Geng, G., Hong, C., Liu, F., Song, Y., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Cui, H., Man, H., Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Anthropogenic emission inventories in China: a review, Natl. Sci. Rev., 4, 834–866, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx150</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, Z., Docherty, K. S., Zhang, H., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Rubitschun, C. L., Shaw, S. L., Knipping, E. M., Edgerton, E. S., Kleindienst, T. E., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Isoprene Epoxydiols as Precursors to Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation: Acid-Catalyzed Reactive Uptake Studies with Authentic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 250–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es202554c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es202554c</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, Y.-H., Zhang, H., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, Z., Marth, W. J., Park, S., Arashiro, M., Cui, T., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Sexton, K. G., Vizuete, W., Xie, Y., Luecken, D. J., Piletic, I. R., Edney, E. O., Bartolotti, L. J., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Epoxide as a precursor to secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene photooxidation in the presence of nitrogen oxides, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 6718–6723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221150110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221150110</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Ma, P.-L., Wang, H., Tilmes, S., Singh, B., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 505–522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., Dong, X., Emmons, L. K., Jo, D. S., Liu, Y., Shrivastava, M., Yue, M., Liang, Y., Song, Z., He, X., and Wang, M.: Exploring the Factors Controlling the Long‐Term Trend (1988–2019) of Surface Organic Aerosols in the Continental United States by Simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037935" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037935</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, Z., Liu, X., Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Tilmes, S., Emmons, L. K., Vitt, F., Singh, B., Wang, H., Zhang, R., and Rasch, P. J.: Radiative Forcing of Nitrate Aerosols From 1975 to 2010 as Simulated by MOSAIC Module in CESM2‐MAM4, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034809" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034809</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mael, L. E., Jacobs, M. I., and Elrod, M. J.: Organosulfate and nitrate formation and reactivity from epoxides derived from 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4464–4472, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510033s" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510033s</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Hu, W., Krechmer, J., Zhu, L., Kim, P. S., Miller, C. C., Fisher, J. A., Travis, K., Yu, K., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Arkinson, H. L., Pye, H. O. T., Froyd, K. D., Liao, J., and McNeill, V. F.: Aqueous-phase mechanism for secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the southeast United States and co-benefit of SO<sub>2</sub> emission controls, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1603–1618, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Turner, J. R., and Mickley, L. J.: Evidence of 1991–2013 decrease of biogenic secondary organic aerosol in response to SO<sub>2</sub> emission controls, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 054018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa69c8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa69c8</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miao, R., Chen, Q., Shrivastava, M., Chen, Y., Zhang, L., Hu, J., Zheng, Y., and Liao, K.: Process-based and observation-constrained SOA simulations in China: the role of semivolatile and intermediate-volatility organic compounds and OH levels, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16183–16201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16183-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16183-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ng, A. E., Chen, Y., Green, J., Farrell, S., Surratt, J. D., Ault, A. P., Turpin, B. J., and Vizuete, W. C.: Regional-scale modeling parameterizations for secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene epoxydiols: experimentally based evaluation and optimization, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 2, 2625–2637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00258" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00258</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nguyen, T. B., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Schwantes, R. H., Zhang, X., Kjaergaard, H. G., Surratt, J. D., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Mechanism of the hydroxyl radical oxidation of methacryloyl peroxynitrate (MPAN) and its pathway toward secondary organic aerosol formation in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 17914–17926, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp02001h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp02001h</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Odum, J. R., Hoffmann, T., Bowman, F., Collins, D., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas/particle partitioning and secondary organic aerosol yields, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2580–2585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es950943" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es950943</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
OpenAI: ChatGPT image-generation tools, OpenAI, <a href="https://chatgpt.com/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 June 2026), 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paulot, F., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kroll, J. H., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Isoprene photooxidation: new insights into the production of acids and organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1479–1501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1479-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1479-2009</a>, 2009a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paulot, F., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., Kürten, A., St. Clair, J. M., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wennberg, P. O.: Unexpected Epoxide Formation in the Gas-Phase Photooxidation of Isoprene, Science, 325, 730–733, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172910" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172910</a>, 2009b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pye, H. O. T. and Seinfeld, J. H.: A global perspective on aerosol from low-volatility organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4377–4401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4377-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4377-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pye, H. O. T., Pinder, R. W., Piletic, I. R., Xie, Y., Capps, S. L., Lin, Y.-H., Surratt, J. D., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Luecken, D. J., Hutzell, W. T., Jaoui, M., Offenberg, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Lewandowski, M., and Edney, E. O.: Epoxide pathways improve model predictions of isoprene markers and reveal key role of acidity in aerosol formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11056–11064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402106h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es402106h</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pye, H. O. T., Zuend, A., Fry, J. L., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Capps, S. L., Appel, K. W., Foroutan, H., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., and Goldstein, A. H.: Coupling of organic and inorganic aerosol systems and the effect on gas–particle partitioning in the southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 357–370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-357-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-357-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rattanavaraha, W., Chu, K., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Riva, M., Lin, Y.-H., Edgerton, E. S., Baumann, K., Shaw, S. L., Guo, H., King, L., Weber, R. J., Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Offenberg, J. H., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Assessing the impact of anthropogenic pollution on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation in PM<sub>2.5</sub> collected from the Birmingham, Alabama, ground site during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4897–4914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4897-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4897-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riva, M., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Boyer, H. C., Narayan, S., Yee, L. D., Green, H. S., Cui, T., Zhang, Z., Baumann, K., Fort, M., Edgerton, E., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Rose, C. A., Ribeiro, I. O., E Oliveira, R. L., Dos Santos, E. O., Machado, C. M. D., Szopa, S., Zhao, Y., Alves, E. G., De Sá, S. S., Hu, W., Knipping, E. M., Shaw, S. L., Duvoisin Junior, S., De Souza, R. A. F., Palm, B. B., Jimenez, J.-L., Glasius, M., Goldstein, A. H., Pye, H. O. T., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Vizuete, W., Martin, S. T., Thornton, J. A., Dutcher, C. S., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Increasing Isoprene Epoxydiol-to-Inorganic Sulfate Aerosol Ratio Results in Extensive Conversion of Inorganic Sulfate to Organosulfur Forms: Implications for Aerosol Physicochemical Properties, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 8682–8694, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Robinson, A. L., Donahue, N. M., Shrivastava, M. K., Weitkamp, E. A., Sage, A. M., Grieshop, A. P., Lane, T. E., Pierce, J. R., and Pandis, S. N.: Rethinking organic aerosols: semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging, Science, 315, 1259–1262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133061</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Royer, H. M., Harrill, A. J., Christensen, C. M., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Ault, A. P., Surratt, J. D., and Turpin, B. J.: 2-Methyltetrol sulfate oxidation by hydroxyl radical in atmospheric water mimics and implications for the fate of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 3, 806–815, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00406" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00406</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmedding, R., Ma, M., Zhang, Y., Farrell, S., Pye, H. O. T., Chen, Y., Wang, C., Rasool, Q. Z., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Ault, A. P., Surratt, J. D., and Vizuete, W.: <i>α</i>-Pinene-Derived organic coatings on acidic sulfate aerosol impacts secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene in a box model, Atmos. Environ., 213, 456–462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.005</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmedding, R., Rasool, Q. Z., Zhang, Y., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Surratt, J. D., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Thornton, J. A., Goldstein, A. H., and Vizuete, W.: Predicting secondary organic aerosol phase state and viscosity and its effect on multiphase chemistry in a regional-scale air quality model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8201–8225, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8201-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8201-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwantes, R. H., Charan, S. M., Bates, K. H., Huang, Y., Nguyen, T. B., Mai, H., Kong, W., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Low-volatility compounds contribute significantly to isoprene secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under high-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7255–7278, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7255-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7255-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwantes, R. H., Emmons, L. K., Orlando, J. J., Barth, M. C., Tyndall, G. S., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., St. Clair, J. M., Blake, D. R., Wisthaler, A., and Bui, T. P. V.: Comprehensive isoprene and terpene gas-phase chemistry improves simulated surface ozone in the southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3739–3776, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shrivastava, M., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Berg, L. K., Brito, J., Ching, J., Easter, R. C., Fan, J., Fast, J. D., Feng, Z., Fuentes, J. D., Glasius, M., Goldstein, A. H., Alves, E. G., Gomes, H., Gu, D., Guenther, A., Jathar, S. H., Kim, S., Liu, Y., Lou, S., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Medeiros, A., De Sá, S. S., Shilling, J. E., Springston, S. R., Souza, R. A. F., Thornton, J. A., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Yee, L. D., Ynoue, R., Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhao, C.: Urban pollution greatly enhances formation of natural aerosols over the Amazon rainforest, Nat. Commun., 10, 1046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08909-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08909-4</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shrivastava, M., Rasool, Q. Z., Zhao, B., Octaviani, M., Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., Gaudet, B., Liu, Y., Shilling, J. E., Schneider, J., Schulz, C., Zöger, M., Martin, S. T., Ye, J., Guenther, A., Souza, R. F., Wendisch, M., and Pöschl, U.: Tight Coupling of Surface and In-Plant Biochemistry and Convection Governs Key Fine Particulate Components over the Amazon Rainforest, ACS Earth Space Chem., 6, 380–390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00356</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Silver, B., Conibear, L., Reddington, C. L., Knote, C., Arnold, S. R., and Spracklen, D. V.: Pollutant emission reductions deliver decreased PM<sub>2.5</sub>-caused mortality across China during 2015–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11683–11695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11683-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11683-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stadtler, S., Kühn, T., Schröder, S., Taraborrelli, D., Schultz, M. G., and Kokkola, H.: Isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in the global aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0–HAM2.3–MOZ1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3235–3260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, S., Li, B., Cui, S., and Tao, S.: Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Combustion in China: From 1990 to 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 8403–8410, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es201656f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es201656f</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Surratt, J. D., Kroll, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Claeys, M., Sorooshian, A., Ng, N. L., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Evidence for Organosulfates in Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 517–527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es062081q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es062081q</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R., Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organosulfate Formation in Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 8345–8378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Surratt, J. D., Chan, A. W. H., Eddingsaas, N. C., Chan, M., Loza, C. L., Kwan, A. J., Hersey, S. P., Flagan, R. C., Wennberg, P. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Reactive intermediates revealed in secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6640–6645, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911114107</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tilmes, S., Hodzic, A., Emmons, L. K., Mills, M. J., Gettelman, A., Kinnison, D. E., Park, M., Lamarque, J.-F., Vitt, F., Shrivastava, M., Campuzano‐Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., and Liu, X.: Climate Forcing and Trends of Organic Aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 4323–4351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001827</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wennberg, P. O., Bates, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Dodson, L. G., McVay, R. C., Mertens, L. A., Nguyen, T. B., Praske, E., Schwantes, R. H., Smarte, M. D., St Clair, J. M., Teng, A. P., Zhang, X., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas-Phase Reactions of Isoprene and Its Major Oxidation Products, Chem. Rev., 118, 3337–3390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00439</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Worton, D. R., Surratt, J. D., LaFranchi, B. W., Chan, A. W. H., Zhao, Y., Weber, R. J., Park, J.-H., Gilman, J. B., De Gouw, J., Park, C., Schade, G., Beaver, M., St. Clair, J. M., Crounse, J., Wennberg, P., Wolfe, G. M., Harrold, S., Thornton, J. A., Farmer, D. K., Docherty, K. S., Cubison, M. J., Jimenez, J.-L., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Kristensen, K., Glasius, M., Mao, J., Ren, X., Brune, W., Browne, E. C., Pusede, S. E., Cohen, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Goldstein, A. H.: Observational Insights into Aerosol Formation from Isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11403–11413, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es4011064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es4011064</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, K., Yang, X., Chen, D., Gu, S., Lu, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, K., Ou, Y., Qian, Y., Shao, P., and Lu, S.: Estimation of biogenic VOC emissions and their corresponding impact on ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation in China, Atmos. Res., 231, 104656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104656" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104656</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, R., Chen, Y., Ng, S. I. M., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P., Surratt, J. D., and Chan, M. N.: Formation of inorganic sulfate and volatile nonsulfated products from heterogeneous hydroxyl radical oxidation of 2-methyltetrol sulfate aerosols: mechanisms and atmospheric implications, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 11, 968–974, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00451</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Q., Yuan, Q., Li, T., Shen, H., and Zhang, L.: The relationships between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and meteorological factors in China: seasonal and regional variations, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pu., 14, 1510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121510" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121510</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.: Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC), J. Geophys. Res., 113, 2007JD008782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Singh, B., Wang, H., Lu, Z., Tilmes, S., Emmons, L. K., Vitt, F., Zhang, R., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Development and Evaluation of Chemistry‐Aerosol‐Climate Model CAM5‐Chem‐MAM7‐MOSAIC: Global Atmospheric Distribution and Radiative Effects of Nitrate Aerosol, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 13, e2020MS002346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002346</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zawadowicz, M. A., Lee, B. H., Shrivastava, M., Zelenyuk, A., Zaveri, R. A., Flynn, C., Thornton, J. A., and Shilling, J. E.: Photolysis controls atmospheric budgets of biogenic secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 3861–3870, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07051</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian climate centre general circulation model, Atmos. Ocean, 33, 407–446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539</a>, 1995.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Yue, M., Dong, X., Huang, K., and Wang, M.: Understanding the long-term trend of organic aerosol and the influences from anthropogenic emission and regional climate change in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3857–3872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3857-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3857-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lambe, A. T., Olson, N. E., Lei, Z., Craig, R. L., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Gaston, C. J., Thornton, J. A., Vizuete, W., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Effect of the Aerosol-Phase State on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from the Reactive Uptake of Isoprene-Derived Epoxydiols (IEPOX), Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 5, 167–174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Riva, M., Koss, A. R., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Onasch, T. B., Kroll, J. H., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Joint impacts of acidity and viscosity on the formation of secondary organic aerosol from isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX) in phase-separated particles, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 2646–2658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00209</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y.-Q., Ding, X., He, Q.-F., Wen, T.-X., Wang, J.-Q., Yang, K., Jiang, H., Cheng, Q., Liu, P., Wang, Z.-R., He, Y.-F., Hu, W.-W., Wang, Q.-Y., Xin, J.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., and Wang, X.-M.: Observational Insights into Isoprene Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation through the Epoxide Pathway at Three Urban Sites from Northern to Southern China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 4795–4805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06974" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06974</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, Y., Thornton, J. A., Ng, N. L., Cao, H., Henze, D. K., McDuffie, E. E., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Marais, E. A., Edgerton, E., and Mao, J.: Long-term observational constraints of organic aerosol dependence on inorganic species in the southeast US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13091–13107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13091-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13091-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhu, S., Zhang, J., Li, L., Zhou, M., Qiao, L., Wang, H., Huang, D. D., Wang, Q., Jing, S., Wu, Y., Wang, S., Chen, C., Ying, Q., and Yu, J. Z.: Aerosol Uptake Coefficients of Isoprene Epoxides: Determination and Parameter Estimation from Online Field Measurements of Organic Molecular Markers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 18249–18258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c09046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c09046</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
