<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-11785-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Measurement Report: Quantitative analysis of aerosol acidity and its driving factors in Guanzhong area, Northwest China</article-title><alt-title>Quantitative analysis of aerosol acidity</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Qian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Xiao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Minxia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Yali</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yifan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Weining</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Yue</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Shicong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>Zhuoer</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Dai</surname><given-names>Wenting</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jianjun</given-names></name>
          <email>lijj@ieecas.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-5379</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Xi'an Institute for Innovative Earth Environment Research, Xi'an, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>National Field Observation and Research Station (Shaanxi) for Ecological and Environment Changes and Integrated Management in the Guanzhong Plain Region, Xi'an, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jianjun Li (lijj@ieecas.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>11785</fpage><lpage>11802</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Qian Wang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e204">Aerosol acidity significantly affects atmospheric chemistry and human health, yet its driving factors remain controversial. This study systematically examined a year-long characteristics of water-soluble inorganic ions in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the semi-arid Guanzhong Plain, Northwest China, and quantitatively analyzed its acidity and driving factors. The annual mean pH of PM<sub>2.5</sub> was 3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 (winter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> autumn). As pollution increased, aerosol pH shifted from the acidic range (2–5) on clean days to a near-neutral range (3–6) on polluted days. Sensitivity tests and driver analysis revealed that atmospheric temperature (22.3 %–33.8 %), NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (gas NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 11.4 %–44.9 %), and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (8.5 %–10.8 %) were common key factors influencing pH across all seasons, with the percentages representing the quantitative contribution of each factor to the overall pH variation. Among these, temperature played a dominant role in seasonal variations, while NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> was the primary contributor during autumn and winter. Notably, Ca<sup>2+</sup> emerged as a unique driver specific to spring, the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 8.8 %, indicating a substantial impact of Ca<sup>2+</sup> variability on spring aerosol pH. Relative humidity (RH) exhibited a distinctive non-linear regulatory effect, i.e., aerosol pH initially decreases and subsequently increases with rising RH (inflection point occurred at 60 %–85 %). This phenomenon is primarily attributed to an abrupt change in liquid water content triggered by the deliquescence of hygroscopic components. Our results enhance the understanding of the contributions of various factors to aerosol pH.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42577120</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province</funding-source>
<award-id>2025JC-YBQN-450</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42407156</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e345">Atmospheric aerosols play a vital role in the Earth's atmospheric system, significantly impacting regional and global air quality, climate change, and human health (Liu et al., 2025b; Zhang et al., 2017). Among these properties, aerosol acidity, typically characterized by pH, is one of the most critical parameters. Research indicates that acidity can directly or indirectly regulate the gas-particle partitioning of semi-volatile species and the rates of chemical reactions (Guo et al., 2016; Paglione et al., 2021). It drives pH-dependent aqueous-phase reactions and impacts other processes related to particle formation and growth. Additionally, acidity can enhance the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and influence its transformation pathways through acid-catalyzed reactions (Rengarajan et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2019). Moreover, aerosol pH affects the dissolution of trace metals and the concentration of their toxic forms, with stronger acidity promoting metal dissolution via acid dissociation (Ding et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2011). High aerosol acidity levels not only increase the risks of respiratory illnesses and specific cancers but also drive atmospheric processes that lead to complex air pollution, dry and wet deposition of pollutants, and ultimate impacts on human health and the climate system (Mao et al., 2009; Pye et al., 2020). Therefore, the exploration of particle pH is crucial for enhancing air quality management strategies and policy development, which is highly important for alleviating the health and environmental consequences of air pollution. The direct measurement of atmospheric aerosol acidity presents challenges (Xu et al., 2025), primarily due to the difficulties in quantifying the aqueous-phase concentrations of semi-volatile compounds and H<sup>+</sup> in ambient particulate matter. Thus, thermodynamic models, such as E-AIM (Clegg et al., 1998) and ISORROPIA (Nenes et al., 1998), were frequently used as a proxy method for assessing aerosol acidity in recent decades.</p>
      <p id="d2e357">Aerosol acidity displays notable spatiotemporal variability, playing a crucial role in atmospheric environmental research. Globally, aerosols in Europe and North America generally exhibit higher acidity levels compared to those in China, with pH values 1–2 units lower (Zhang et al., 2021a). In North America, coastal cities in Canada frequently exhibit greater aerosol acidity than inland regions, primarily due to elevated humidity that enhances the aqueous-phase oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> (Brook et al., 1997). In China, aerosol acidity typically rises from north to south. Specifically, during winter in the heavily polluted North China Plain, pH values typically range from 4.1 to 4.9 (Ding et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2017; Shi et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2018). In the Guanzhong region, aerosol pH can reach as high as 5 (Wang et al., 2016). Conversely, coastal cities in southeastern China, such as Guangzhou and Xiamen, display significantly lower mean pH values of 2.5 and 3.5, respectively (Jia et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2025). Furthermore, vertical differences in aerosol acidity are also noteworthy. As altitude increases, aerosol acidity generally intensifies, with higher acidity observed at mountain summits compared to surface levels (Feng et al., 2023; Guo et al., 2016). Temporally, aerosol acidity is typically higher in summer than in winter, while patterns in spring and autumn fluctuate based on regional climatic and emission characteristics (Tan et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2025). In recent years, aerosol acidity has gained prominence in academic research and discussion due to its critical role in influencing aerosol physicochemical properties (Cui et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2021; Paglione et al., 2021; Tao et al., 2025). However, its levels are governed by numerous, complex, and region-dependent factors, leading to significant spatial heterogeneity. Therefore, investigating the dynamic changes in aerosol acidity throughout different seasons and understanding the underlying mechanisms are crucial for enhancing our comprehension of haze formation and developing precise air pollution control strategies.</p>
      <p id="d2e369">Through quantitative analysis of aerosol pH driving factors and elucidation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical composition and meteorological impacts across seasons, we can better understand spatiotemporal variation pattern (Jia et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2025). Previous studies showed that in Beijing, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> significantly affect PM<sub>2.5</sub> pH, while Ca<sup>2+</sup> and RH serve as dominant factors in spring and summer, respectively (Ding et al., 2019). In contrast, in southeastern Chinese cities such as Guangzhou and Xiamen, meteorological parameters like <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH exert an even greater influence on pH variation than chemical components (Jia et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2025). These findings underscore the complexity of the factors influencing aerosol acidity. However, existing studies have largely focused on compositional analyses in specific cities, resulting in both a lack of year-round quantitative attribution of pH drivers in semi-arid regions, insufficient comparison of chemical versus meteorological contributions, and neglect of alkaline dust, as well as an overall insufficient understanding of the trends in aerosol pH values and their primary driving factors and relative contributions.</p>
      <p id="d2e441">Guanzhong Plain is a vital economic and agricultural center in northwestern China, where rapid industrial and urban development has resulted in severe air pollution complexities. The mechanisms of air pollution formation and its driving factors in the region are significantly shaped by its inland geographical characteristics and socio-economic conditions. The unique semi-enclosed topography, with the Loess Plateau to the north and the Qinling Mountains to the south, restricts pollutant dispersion, leading to the accumulation of various pollutants and enabling complex chemical reactions (Huang et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2025b; Shen et al., 2024). This confinement likely amplifies the influence of local emissions on aerosol pH due to the accumulation of both acidic and alkaline species. The area is known for its intensive agricultural practices, contributing to high levels of ammonia emissions that influence aerosol acid-base equilibrium. The ammonia-rich condition likely neutralizes acidic components, thereby shifting aerosol pH toward a weaker acidic range (Liu et al., 2019). Additionally, long-distance transportation from the nearby Loess Plateau introduces alkaline mineral dust and crustal cations (e.g., Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>) that can neutralize acidic components effectively. Furthermore, seasonal variation of meteorological conditions also influences the transformation and removal processes of pollutants. The combination of these factors makes the Guanzhong Plain a unique location for a comprehensive study on aerosol pH trends and key influencing factors, which would differ from those in southeastern coastal cities of China, where marine air masses and hot, humid meteorological conditions predominantly influence air quality.</p>
      <p id="d2e469">In this study, we conducted a year-long observation of water-soluble inorganic compositions of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the Guanzhong region, and utilized an ISORROPIA-II model to access aerosol pH and liquid water content. The primary objectives of this study are: (1) to characterize the seasonal variation of aerosol acidity in the Guanzhong Plain and to examine its evolution under varying pollution levels; and (2) to identify the key driving factors influencing aerosol pH in each season and to quantify their relative contributions across different seasons.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e483">Locations of monitoring stations in Qinling.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sample collection</title>
      <p id="d2e507">PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples were collected at the National Field Observation and Research Station (Shaanxi) for Ecological and Environment Changes and Integrated Management in the Guanzhong Plain Region, Xi'an, China (34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>3<sup>′</sup>39<sup>′′</sup> N, 108<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>20<sup>′</sup>37<sup>′′</sup> E; 503 m a.s.l.). This station is positioned at the northern foothills of the Qinling Mountains (Fig. 1) and functions as a regional background site. It is located approximately 60 km southwest of Xi'an city, with no significant industrial, traffic, or other substantial anthropogenic pollution sources. The sampling campaign spanned from 1 January  to 21 December  2022, and a total of 295 valid samples were obtained during the study. Daily sampling was conducted from 10:00 to 09:00 the next day, lasting for 23 h. Samples were collected using a medium-flow sampler (HC-1010, China Qingdao Company, China) equipped with quartz fiber filters (Whatman QMA, USA) with pre-baked (450 °C, 5 h) quartz fiber filters (Whatman, QMA, USA) at an airflow rate of 100 L min<sup>−1</sup>. After sampling, each filter sample was promptly enveloped in aluminum foil, sealed, and frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C for subsequent laboratory analysis. To ensure quality control, field blank samples were collected both before and after sampling. This involved placing pretreated blank filters into the sampler, allowing them to stand for 10 min without activating the pump, and then sealing and storing them using the same procedure as the actual samples. The chemical analysis data for all samples were adjusted by deducting the average concentration measured from the two blank samples to eliminate potential systematic errors.</p>
      <p id="d2e598">Daily average concentrations of PM<sub>10</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, CO, and O<sub>3</sub>-8 h (defined as the maximum 8 h average O<sub>3</sub> concentration) were obtained from the local government. Meteorological parameters, including ambient temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (WS), and atmospheric pressure (AP), were acquired from the National Observation and Research Station for Regional Ecological Environment Change and Comprehensive Management in the Guanzhong Plain, Shaanxi Province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Analysis of water-soluble inorganic ions and ammonium partitioning ratio</title>
      <p id="d2e662">Water-soluble inorganic ions (WSIIs), including SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, and Na<sup>+</sup>, were analyzed using ion chromatography (Metrohm-940, Switzerland). To enhance measurement accuracy, a fixed amount of lithium bromide was added to the eluent. For quality assurance, one sample out of every ten was randomly selected for re-analysis. All WSII concentrations were corrected using field blanks, which exhibited concentrations less than 10 % of those in ambient samples. The limits of detection (LODs) for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, and Na<sup>+</sup> were 0.027, 0.026, 0.0010, 0.0087, 0.0012, 0.0011, 0.0008, and 0.0005 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively (Liu et al., 2025b). The mass concentrations of all detected WSIIs were significantly higher than their corresponding LODs.</p>
      <p id="d2e868">As detailed in the preceding section, this study employed ammonium partitioning ratio (NHR) to quantify the transformation of gaseous ammonia into particulate ammonium (Xie et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021b). This ratio is defined as the molar concentration of particulate ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<sup>−3</sup>) relative to the total molar concentration of inorganic ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) + <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<sup>−3</sup>), calculated using the following equation:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M66" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NHR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Calculation of aerosol pH</title>
      <p id="d2e1019">In this study, the ISORROPIA-II model was utilized to estimate aerosol thermodynamic parameters. The model was operated in “forward” mode, based on the assumption that aerosols were in a “metastable” state (Fountoukis and Nenes, 2007; Nenes et al., 1998), with inputs including concentrations of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aerosol pH was calculated using the following equation:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pH</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALWC</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the hydronium ion activity coefficient (assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) indicates the concentration of hydronium ions per unit volume of air, and ALWC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) signifies the aerosol liquid water content. It should be noted that the model-calculated pH values are more reliable when the RH falls within the range of 30 % to 95 % (Guo et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e1234">Neglecting the influence of gaseous species, such as NH<sub>3</sub>, HNO<sub>3</sub>, and HCl, on aerosol acidity often results in an underestimation of acidity. The effect of these gases on aerosol pH can only be dismissed when their atmospheric concentrations are exceedingly low (Guo et al., 2015; Hennigan et al., 2015). In China, atmospheric ammonia concentrations are relatively high, and the study region is characterized by elevated ammonia levels; thus, NH<sub>3</sub> cannot be overlooked. In this study, We modified the method of Wei et al. (2023) by shifting the prediction target from NH<sub>3</sub> to NHR. Based on our earlier datasets (Wu et al., 2020), we performed multiple linear regression to estimate NHR, which was subsequently used to retrieve NH<sub>3</sub> levels. However, previous research has shown that the concentrations of gaseous HNO<sub>3</sub> and HCl in urban Xi'an remained below 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> throughout all seasons. Since the Qinling site serves as a background location, concentrations there are anticipated to be even lower. Given these negligibly low levels, we utilized the measured concentrations of particulate NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Cl<sup>−</sup> as inputs for TNO<sub>3</sub> and TCl, respectively (Nah et al., 2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Multiple linear regression model</title>
      <p id="d2e1350">In ammonia-rich regions, aerosol pH, particularly during winter, is primarily influenced by NH<sub>3</sub> levels (Tao and Murphy, 2019). However, the frequent absence of long-term and continuous NH<sub>3</sub> observational data impedes the analysis of long-term trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical properties. To fill this data gap and explore variations in aerosol pH in the research area, this study aimed to create a model for estimating the NHR based on easily accessible routine monitoring data to estimate NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations. Given the well-established thermodynamic and chemical relationships between NHR and factors such as NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fountoukis  and Nenes, 2007), all parameters that serve as inputs to the thermodynamic model ISORROPIA-II, were included as candidate independent variables. Multiple linear regression (MLR) was performed using SPSS software with NHR as the dependent variable, and the model parameters were estimated using ordinary least squares.</p>
      <p id="d2e1424">The model was trained using a previous high-resolution (1 h) online PM<sub>2.5</sub> dataset from an urban site in Xi'an during 2016–2017 (Wu et al., 2020), which included major WSIIs concentrations in PM<sub>2.5</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations, and meteorological data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH) from the same observation site. The data covered all four seasons: winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">605</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from 21 December 2016 to 23 January 2017), spring (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">704</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from 31 March to 30 April 2016), summer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">591</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from 8 July to 6 August 2017), and autumn (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1032</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from 1 October to 15 November 2017). Following model construction, its validity and accuracy were systematically assessed using the correlation coefficient, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test (Wei et al., 2023). For variables with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, they were retained to preserve model integrity, as they may indirectly influence NHR and were shown to have a negligible effect on pH verified by comparison (Table S1 in the Supplement). Despite the variations in ion concentrations between the training data and our study site, the thermodynamic mechanism that governs NHR remains consistent across different concentration levels. Furthermore, the ranges of the key input variables encompass the observed values at our site. Consequently, the model trained on urban data can be effectively utilized to predict NHR at the background site.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Sensitivity tests and quantitative analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1545">This study assessed the impact of various factors on aerosol pH through sensitivity tests. The variables analyzed included meteorological parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH) and chemical components (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>) (Tao and Murphy, 2019). The specific sensitivity analysis adhered to the methodology outlined by Ding et al. (2019): Within the ISORROPIA-II model, the measured value of a target variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was used sequentially as input alongside the average values of all other parameters. By observing the resulting trend in the output pH, the individual effect of variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on aerosol pH could be assessed.</p>
      <p id="d2e1657">To quantitatively evaluate the influence of each factor on aerosol pH, two complementary approaches were utilized: the relative standard deviation (RSD) method and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pH contribution decomposition method. The RSD, which is derived from the coefficient of variation of pH responses in sensitivity analysis (the ratio of standard deviation to mean), indicates the relative sensitivity of aerosol pH to typical fluctuations of a given factor; a higher RSD signifies a greater potential impact. However, the RSD method provides only a relative ranking and does not directly determine the absolute contribution of each factor to the observed pH. Consequently, this study emphasizes the quantitative analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pH contributions quantitative analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e1674">Assuming the aerosol pH estimated under scenario 1 (pH<sub>1</sub>) differed from that under scenario 2 (pH<sub>2</sub>), the pH difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pH<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pH<sub>1</sub>) was thus caused by the variations in the factors listed above. The quantitative analysis method adhered to the approach outlined by Zhou et al. (2022). To quantify the contribution of a single variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within the ISORROPIA-II model, the value of factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was altered from its Scenario 1 value to its Scenario 2 value, while all other parameters remained constant. The resulting change in pH was recorded as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pH<sub><italic>j</italic></sub>, which represents the independent contribution of that specific factor to the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pH. In this study, the aforementioned method was applied to consecutive seasonal pairs in the following order: spring values were substituted into the winter scenario, summer values into spring, autumn values into summer, and winter values into autumn (Table S2). For each pairwise substitution, Scenario 2 denotes the season being introduced, while Scenario 1 refers to the base season. Consequently, the calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pH quantifies the impact of each factor's seasonal shift on aerosol pH. The remaining change in pH, not accounted for by this procedure, is attributed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pH<sub>others</sub>, reflecting the combined effects of synergistic variations among the factors.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1800">Concentrations of air pollutants, meteorological parameters, chemical components and ammonia-related species (NHR from multiple linear regression and NH<sub>3</sub> from back-calculates of NHR, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas NH<sub>3</sub>+NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in different seasons.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Annual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Summer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Autumn</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<sub>2.5</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">65.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 61.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">93.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">33.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">43.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<sub>10</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">97.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">146.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 61.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">87.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">94.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 49.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">289.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">278.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">291.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">302.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">290.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RH (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">66.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">61.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">80.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WS (m s<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CO (mg m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<sub>3</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">99.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">67.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">109.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">150.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">83.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WSIIs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SNA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cl<sup>−</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ca<sup>2+</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K<sup>+</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mg<sup>2+</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Na<sup>+</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<sub>3</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NHR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3672">The time series data for PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations, criteria air pollutants (SO<sub>2</sub>, CO, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub>-8 h), and meteorological parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH, WS, and AP).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Seasonal variations in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and its chemical composition</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Seasonal variations in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and air pollutants</title>
      <p id="d2e3767">The annual variation for PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations, gaseous pollutants (SO<sub>2</sub>, CO, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub>-8 h), and meteorological parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH, WS, and AP) are shown in Fig. 2, with seasonal statistics summarized in Table 1. The sampling period in 2022 was categorized into four seasons based on local heating patterns and human activity trends: winter (1 January  to 12 March, and 15 November  to 21 December), spring (16 March  to 31 May), summer (1 June  to 30 August), and autumn (1 September  to 14 November). During the observation period, the PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentration varied from 9.8 to 221.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, with an annual mean of 65.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 61.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>. This concentration is lower than those reported for other typical areas in the Guanzhong Plain (Liu et al., 2025b; Zhang et al., 2019), aligning with expectations of minimal local emission influence at this site. In comparison to the annual mean of 105.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> recorded at a Qinling background station in 2012 (Niu et al., 2016), the concentration observed in this study is approximately 36 % lower, suggesting a significant reduction in air pollution in recent years due to effective air quality control measures. PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations exhibited marked seasonal variations, showing the seasonal order of winter (93.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spring (61.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> autumn (43.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> summer (33.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). The majority of days exceeding the daily PM<sub>2.5</sub> limitation (Grade II, 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) from the ambient air quality standards of China occurred in winter, with about 68 % of daily average concentrations surpassing the limitation (Table S3). This trend underscores the significant influence of heating activities and adverse meteorological conditions on air quality.</p>
      <p id="d2e4061">The concentrations of gaseous pollutants also demonstrated significant seasonal variations. CO and NO<sub>2</sub>, primary pollutants mainly from fossil fuel combustion, had higher levels in autumn and winter and lower levels in spring and summer, particularly elevated during the heating period compared to the non-heating period. This pattern is linked to increased emissions during heating demands in autumn and winter, along with unfavorable meteorological conditions hindering pollutant dispersion (Liu et al., 2025b). Due to its strong dependence on solar radiation intensity and temperature, O<sub>3</sub>-8 h value peaked in July during summer (156.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and subsequently decreased as sunlight weakened with varying intensity. This anti-phase variation underscores the seasonal differences in the dominant formation mechanisms for different pollutants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Water-soluble inorganic ions in PM<sub>2.5</sub></title>
      <p id="d2e4119">The concentrations of WSIIs (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>) in PM<sub>2.5</sub> are shown in Fig. 2 and Table 1. The annual average concentration of total measured WSIIs was 24.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, representing approximately 38 % of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass. Significant seasonal variations were noted, with concentrations following the order: winter (39.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> autumn (19.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spring (18.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> summer (8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). Among the WSIIs, secondary inorganic aerosols (i.e., SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (SNA)) were the predominant constituents, collectively contributing 89.0 % to the total WSIIs. This SNA-dominated composition suggests that aerosol pH is regulated by the neutralization balance between NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the acidic anions SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thereby laying a chemical foundation for the analysis of seasonal driving factors. Notably, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited the highest concentration (8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, 35.9 %), followed by SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, 20.7 %) and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, 16.3 %), indicating nitrate as the most abundant ionic species. This might be driven by enhanced atmospheric oxidation and rising ammonia emissions via pathways like OH radical and N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> reactions. Nitrate dominance, as opposed to sulfate-dominated conditions, indicates a stronger reliance of aerosol acid-base balance on the partitioning of semi-volatile NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>. This partitioning process is highly sensitive to ambient temperature, relative humidity, and ammonia concentration, which may result in greater dynamic variations in aerosol pH (Song et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e4606">The ternary plot in Fig. S1 in the Supplement illustrates the molar concentration ratios of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across seasons. The proportion of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within SNA was markedly greater in winter compared to summer, while the situation was reversed for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These seasonal fluctuations primarily stem from the thermal instability and volatility of NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> at elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Xu et al., 2025), the fractional contributions of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached minimum in summer. Simultaneously, heightened photochemical processes during summer promote the secondary production of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, most data points cluster near the vertex representing NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ternary diagram (the corner where the molar fraction of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches 100 %). This directly indicates a relative abundance of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the observation period. To further quantitatively validate this conclusion, we performed a linear fitting analysis between the predicted NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the observed NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains in excess after neutralizing SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S2). When assuming that NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exist in the forms of (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>, the slope (k) for each season approaches 1, indicating complete conversion to (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> ([NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) rather than to acidic NH<sub>4</sub>HSO<sub>4</sub>([NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). After SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is completely neutralized, any excess NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> then reacts with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signifies the observed NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is higher than the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration predicted based on the complete neutralisation assumption,and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains in excess after fully neutralising SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In practice, the observed excess NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may interact with other anions, such as Cl<sup>−</sup> from biomass burning, potentially forming NH<sub>4</sub>Cl (Ye et al., 2019). This demonstrates that NH<sub>3</sub> is sufficiently abundant in the Guanzhong Plain to fully neutralize the major inorganic acids. This provides direct chemical evidence explaining the elevated aerosol pH levels in the ammonia-rich Guanzhong Plain and establishes a foundation for the subsequent analysis of the buffering contribution of NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> to aerosol acidity.</p>
      <p id="d2e5305">The concributions of the remaining ions (Cl<sup>−</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>) were relatively low, collectively constituting 12.6 % of total WSIIs. The pronounced Ca<sup>2+</sup> peak in spring, originating from dust transport from the Loess Plateau, introduces substantial alkaline mineral components into the atmosphere. These components provide an additional seasonal neutralization capacity and thus exert a significant influence on aerosol acidity (Shen et al., 2024). Cl<sup>−</sup> and K<sup>+</sup>, commonly utilized as tracers for anthropogenic combustion, exhibited highest concentration in winter, likely linked to seasonal biomass burning in western and northern China and subsequent regional transport processes (Liu et al., 2025a; Sun et al., 2013; Xie et al., 2020). These chemical characteristics, particularly the relative predominance of nitrate, reflect the evolution of PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical properties influenced by China's air pollution control policies. Since the implementation of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan in 2013, stringent industrial emission controls and coal reduction measures have yielded significant results, leading to a substantial decrease in SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. Su et al. (2024) reported that SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in Xi'an decreased by approximately 79 % from 2006 to 2021. This reduction has facilitated a shift in aerosol pollution type from sulfate-dominated to nitrate-dominated. This transformation in pollution type has emerged as a new characteristic of regional air pollution across China (Krotkov et al., 2016; Mao et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022).</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e5421">Multiple linear regression results between NHR and its drivers (major particulate ions and meteorological factors) in each season.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Season</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Prediction Equation</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sig.</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Winter</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NHR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.204</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.328</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<sup>2+</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.88</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4" morerows="7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>RH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spring</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NHR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.533</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.065</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<sup>2+</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.83</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.009</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>RH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summer</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NHR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.389</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>K<sup>+</sup><inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.021</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<sup>2+</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.82</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.066</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>RH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Autumn</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NHR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.656</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.064</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.040</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ca<sup>2+</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.86</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>RH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Establishment and validation of NH<sub>3</sub> concentration calculation methods</title>
      <p id="d2e6019">As a crucial precursor of secondary particulate matter, NH<sub>3</sub> influences aerosol acidity through the multiphase buffering of its NH<sub>3</sub>/NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conjugate pair (Liu et al., 2019; Saraswati et al., 2019; Zheng et al., 2020). This buffering effect is especially pronounced in the ammonia-rich Guanzhong Plain (Zhang et al., 2021c; Zheng et al., 2023). However, the lack of online monitoring data for gaseous NH<sub>3</sub> at the sampling site limits the accuracy of pH estimation using thermodynamic models. Therefore, it is important to establish a reliable method for estimating NH<sub>3</sub>. In this study, we adapted the methodology of Wei et al. (2023) by replacing the prediction target from NH<sub>3</sub> to the thermodynamic state parameter NHR, and estimated the NHR using multiple linear regression analysis based on our previous short-term scale datasets (Wu et al., 2020). This is because the direct estimation of NH<sub>3</sub> is prone to interference from meteorological factors and the gas-particle distribution of acidic precursors, resulting in unstable outcomes in ammonia estimation. Consequently, this study opts to estimate NH<sub>3</sub> through NHR and assesses the method's accuracy (Meng et al., 2018; Wei et al., 2023).</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e6100">Pearson correlation among various factors.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6109">Tables 2 and S4 summarize the total results of multiple linear regression analysis in each season. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test results reveal significant correlations for all seasons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), confirming the efficacy of the established statistical regression equations. Subsequently, a Pearson correlation analysis was performed to elucidate the statistical associations between NHR and diverse environmental factors. As shown in Fig. 3 and Table S5, NHR exhibited significant correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with all selected environmental factors in both winter and spring. Among these, the highest correlation coefficient was observed between NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Across all four seasons, NHR showed good correlations with either NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but with distinct seasonal variations. In winter and spring, NHR displayed the highest Pearson correlation coefficients with NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring). Conversely, in summer and autumn, NHR correlated most significantly with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn). These seasonal distinctions primarily arise from fluctuations in the thermodynamic stability of different ammonium salts and the seasonal alterations in their formation pathways (Tao et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2021c).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e6369">Correlation between hourly mean estimated and observed NHR in the training dataset.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6378">This study assessed the reliability of the MLR model estimates through two validation levels. First, the NHR estimated by the MLR model for 2016–2017 was compared to the observed NHR (Fig. 4). The results revealed a significant positive correlation across all seasons (with the intercept constrained to zero, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating that the MLR model predicts NHR with high accuracy. Second, to further validate the pH results at our site, we compared the NHR output from the ISORROPIA-II model with the input NHR (Fig. S3). The results again demonstrated a linear correlation (with the intercept constrained to zero, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), thereby supporting the reliability of subsequent pH simulations. However, a disparity exists between the predicted and observed NHR in Figs. 4 and S3. To evaluate its impact on aerosol pH, we calculated the pH changes associated with both positive and negative NHR deviations (Table S1). The overall pH change resulting from these deviations is less than 0.2 units, which does not affect the primary conclusions. Furthermore, the NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations derived from NHR at our site remain below 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, well within the range of the training dataset from urban site. However, the seasonal NH<sub>3</sub> pattern at our site (2022: winter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> autumn) differs from that in the training dataset (2016: summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> autumn <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> winter). This discrepancy can be attributed to the significant reduction in SO<sub>2</sub> emissions resulting from air pollution control. In 2016, the high concentration of SO<sub>2</sub> emitted from coal combustion reacts rapidly with NH<sub>3</sub> to form (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, and this process consumes large amounts of gaseous NH<sub>3</sub> in winter (Wang et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2023). Due to interannual NH<sub>3</sub> variability, we employed the thermodynamically stable NHR for model training and validation, back-calculated NH<sub>3</sub> from the estimated NHR and measured NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and then used these values in ISORROPIA-II to simulate aerosol pH.</p>

      <fig id="F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e6614">Monthly average aerosol pH, ALWC and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Seasonal variation in aerosol pH and pH under different pollution levels</title>
      <p id="d2e6643">Figure 5 shows the monthly averages of aerosol pH, aerosol liquid water content (ALWC), and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as calculated by the ISORROPIA-II model during the 2022 sampling period. The annual average aerosol pH at the Qinling observation site was 3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0. The seasonal pH averages ranked as follows: winter (4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spring (3.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> autumn (3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> summer (2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7). The average ALWC concentration was 60.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, exhibiting the pattern: winter (80.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 112.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> autumn (76.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 121.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spring (55.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 132.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> summer (10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). Overall, aerosol pH was highest in winter and lowest in summer, with spring and autumn values intermediate. This trend closely aligns with the seasonal evolution of PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical composition and meteorological conditions, reflecting the seasonal pH variation pattern observed in Beijing (Ding et al., 2019). Winter aerosol pH was similar to those reported in Xi'an previously and slightly higher than those recorded during the COVID-19 period (Liu et al., 2025b). A comparison of aerosol acidity levels across various regions in China is detailed in Table S6, revealing substantial regional variability. In contrast to southeastern coastal cities such as Shanghai and Xiamen, typical inland cities like Xi'an and Beijing generally display higher aerosol pH (Fu et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2025b; Xu et al., 2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e6876">To further explore the seasonal characteristics in PM<sub>2.5</sub> acidity/alkalinity under different pollution levels, this study classified PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations into two categories based on ambient air quality standards of China: clean days (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and polluted days (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). A systematic comparison of percentage change in major WSIIs, aerosol pH and ALWC variations corresponding to these pollution levels across different seasons was performed (Table S7, Fig. S4). Under clean conditions, aerosol pH ranged from 2 to 5, whereas under polluted and heavily polluted conditions, it was primarily concentrated between 3 and 6. Independent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-tests confirmed significantly higher pH on polluted days for winter, spring, and autumn (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In summer, only two polluted days were recorded, so the statistical results for summer (Table S7) should be interpreted with caution due to the very limited sample size a reliable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test could not be performed. As air quality declined and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations increased from clean to polluted days, the concentrations of aerosol components and pH values exhibited an upward trend across all seasons. However, the behaviors of RH, ALWC, and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> displayed seasonal discrepancies. In spring and summer, RH, ALWC, and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased as PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations increased. Conversely, during autumn and winter, these parameters increased alongside rising PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations. These findings reveal fundamental differences in the dominant chemical mechanisms of PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution formation across seasons.</p>
      <p id="d2e7045">During spring and summer, pollution formation is mainly controlled by gas-phase photochemical oxidation (Chen et al., 2025; Li et al., 2021). The enhanced solar radiation and high temperatures during these seasons collectively create a highly oxidizing atmospheric environment. While promoting the transformation of precursors, these conditions also drive the decomposition of semi-volatile NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>, leading to the release of gaseous HNO<sub>3</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> (Guo et al., 2018; Tao et al., 2025). Consequently, despite an increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, both ALWC and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations exhibit a decreasing or stabilizing trend due to the reduction of hygroscopic nitrate, while RH remains relatively low because of higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, autumn and winter are characterized by pollution processes driven by heterogeneous and aqueous-phase chemical reactions. The cold temperatures and stagnant weather conditions lead to high RH, promoting the aqueous-phase oxidation of pollutants and inhibiting the evaporation of NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> (Wang et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2021c). This results in the significant formation of highly hygroscopic NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> and (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, which triggers an increase in ALWC. This increase further intensifies heterogeneous reactions and concentrates secondary acidic species such as H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and HNO<sub>3</sub>, leading to a concurrent rise in H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. Consequently, a complex pollution scenario emerges, characterized by a simultaneous increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> ALWC, and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e7241">Sensitivity analysis of influencing factors.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Sensitivity analysis for aerosol pH</title>
      <p id="d2e7258">Sensitivity analysis of aerosol pH and ALWC in response to meteorological conditions and chemical composition is a crucial step for understanding and predicting atmospheric environmental changes. This analysis not only clarifies the nonlinear processes involved in secondary aerosol formation but also assesses the impact of variations in anthropogenic emissions on atmospheric chemical systems (Nah et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2022). In this study, sensitivity analyses were performed for each season, incorporating both particulate-phase compositions and meteorological factors. The effects of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (gas NH<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Cl<sup>−</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, RH, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on aerosol pH, ALWC, and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were evaluated, as illustrated in Fig. 6. The primary driving factors influencing aerosol pH variation across all seasons were NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while Ca<sup>2+</sup> in spring and RH in summer also emerged as important influencing factors. This pattern is consistent with the driving factors identified in the Beijing area (Ding et al., 2019). Regarding ALWC, RH emerged as the most significant factor, followed by NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7459">Sulfate as a key component of secondary inorganic aerosols, is one of the most significant acidic sources in atmospheric fine particulate matter. Sulfuric acid, generated through heterogeneous oxidation processes, is a strong acid that directly increases the concentration of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the particulate phase and reduces the pH (Shah et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2021c). As illustrated in Fig. 6, when the levels of alkaline substances such as NH<sub>3</sub> are maintained constant, aerosol pH significantly declines with increasing SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. The concurrent increase in ALWC and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> confirms the sulfate-driven acidification mechanism: SO<sub>2</sub> is converted to H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> via heterogeneous oxidation, and the dissociation of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> releases H<sup>+</sup>, leading to increase H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and decrease pH. (Ding et al., 2019). The increase in ALWC and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is particularly pronounced during summer and autumn. This sustained rise continuously depletes alkaline buffering substances in the particulate phase, resulting in increased acidity (Guo et al., 2018). Conversely, while nitrate similarly elevates H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ALWC, its overall impact on pH is generally weaker than that of sulfate due to its high volatility (Ding et al., 2019). Except during summer when the pH remained relatively stable, pH values decreased with rising NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in all other seasons.</p>
      <p id="d2e7614">Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>), the primary alkaline gas, plays a crucial role in buffering aerosol pH. In ammonia-rich environments, NH<sub>3</sub> effectively counteracts acidic components, stabilizing pH and resulting in a nonlinear pH response to precursor concentrations (Cui et al., 2025; Karydis et al., 2021; Niu et al., 2016). Simultaneously, the dissolution of NH<sub>3</sub> into the particle phase to form NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> markedly enhances the hygroscopicity of particles, causing an increase in ALWC as NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentrations rise (Jia et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2019). Studies indicate that NH<sub>3</sub> first reacts with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and subsequently with HNO<sub>3</sub> to form NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>. After most nitrate is converted to NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>, it becomes difficult to dissolve additional NH<sub>3</sub> into aerosol droplets (Ding et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2025). The results of this study (Fig. 6) show that the response of pH to NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> is non-linear. When the NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> mass concentration is within the range of 3–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, aerosol pH increases significantly, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases sharply, and ALWC increases with rising NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentration. Nevertheless, when the NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentration surpasses a specific threshold, the trends in pH and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decelerate and subsequently remain relatively stable. It should be noted that the results may be less accurate when NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentration is below 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, as high temperature and intense solar radiation promote the thermal decomposition of semi-volatile ammonium salts. The seasonal variations observed in this study further substantiate the regulatory role of atmospheric ammonia.</p>
      <p id="d2e7859">Ca<sup>2+</sup> is an important crustal element in mineral dust, displaying distinct regional chemical characteristics and effects on aerosol acidity. According to the ISORROPIA-II model, Ca<sup>2+</sup> typically combines with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form the less soluble CaSO<sub>4</sub> solid phase, reducing its solubility and diminishing its effectiveness for neutralizing atmospheric acidity (Fountoukis  and Nenes, 2007; Wang et al., 2016). In the Guanzhong Plain, the regulatory impact of Ca<sup>2+</sup> on aerosol pH is particularly crucial, especially due to the region's proximity to the Loess Plateau and its semi-arid climate. Dust transport from the northwest could shape the alkaline atmospheric conditions in this area. This phenomenon results in neutral aerosol pH in the free troposphere and contributes to the alkalinity of cloud water at high-altitude sites (Liu et al., 2024; Shen et al., 2024). Elevated concentrations of Ca<sup>2+</sup> can increase aerosol pH by decreasing both ALWC and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the most pronounced impact observed during the frequent dust events of spring. These events transport significant amounts of alkaline mineral dust, enhancing acid neutralization, consistent with studies in northern China (Shi et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2018). The relative standard deviation (RSD) can also be used to quantify the sensitivity of aerosol pH to a specific factor, with a higher RSD indicating a greater influence. This study revealed that RSD for Ca<sup>2+</sup> concentration variation in spring reached 8.8 % (Table S8), notably higher than the corresponding RSD of 7.5 % reported for the North China Plain during the same season (Ding et al., 2019). Conversely, in southern coastal urban areas like Xiamen and Guangzhou, which lack robust dust origins, the impact of Ca<sup>2+</sup> on aerosol pH is typically negligible (Jia et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2025). This finding directly confirms the greater influence of dust sources in the Guanzhong Plain.</p>
      <p id="d2e7972">In addition to the particulate chemical composition, meteorological conditions, specifically RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, significantly influence aerosol acidity. This study revealed that during winter, spring, and autumn, aerosol pH displayed a non-linear response to increasing RH, characterized by an initial decrease followed by a subsequent increase. The inflection point typically occurred within the RH range of 60 %–85 %. Beyond this critical threshold, ALWC entered a phase of exponential growth. This phenomenon is probably driven by the deliquescence of the predominant hygroscopic components within the aerosol, primarily NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> and (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, which have deliquescence relative humidities of approximately 62 % and 80 % (Tang, 1996). Notably, the inflection point exhibits clear seasonal variations, which can be attributed to seasonal shifts in aerosol chemical composition (Table 1). Notably, the inflection point varies seasonally maybe due to the varying proportions of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in SNA: high NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn and winter shifts the inflection point toward lower RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 62 %), while the higher SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution in spring shifts it toward higher RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %). Given that actual atmospheric particles are mixtures of various components, their hygroscopic and phase-state characteristics are more complicated (Su et al., 2022; Zheng et al., 2020). In the initial stage, an increase in RH results in a higher ALWC, which facilitates the heterogeneous uptake and aqueous-phase oxidation of acidic precursors, resulting in the formation of strong acids. During this phase, the acid-forming effect dominates the pH change (Du et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021c). Once RH exceeds a critical threshold, ALWC exhibits an exponential growth trend. At this point, the intense dilution effect of RH on H<sup>+</sup> begins to surpass the ongoing acid-forming effect (Karydis et al., 2021). Furthermore, this hygroscopic growth is self-reinforcing, i.e. the increased ALWC provides a more extensive aqueous medium for heterogeneous reactions of gaseous precursors, leading to further formation of hygroscopic salts and further promoting ALWC growth, and thus establishing a positive feedback loop (Su et al., 2022). Concurrently, under high RH conditions, thermodynamic factors favor the partitioning of semi-volatile ammonium salts into the particle phase. This neutralization process further depletes H<sup>+</sup> (Tao et al., 2025). These combined effects ultimately lead to the observed recovery in pH. Ambient temperature can influence aerosol pH by affecting gas-particle partitioning (Ding et al., 2019). The evaporation of semi-volatile ammonium salts plays a crucial role in aerosol acidification by transferring H<sup>+</sup> to the particle phase, consequently decreasing pH (Guo et al., 2018). Elevated ambient temperatures intensify this acidification mechanism synergistically. Thermodynamically, elevated temperatures drive the volatilization process. Concurrently, they reduce ALWC to concentrate H<sup>+</sup> and further enhance acidity.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e8135">The contribution of various influencing factors to the seasonal pH. The asterisk represents the pH of aerosols in each season. The pie chart shows the relative contributions of various influencing factors to the seasonal pH (absolute values of pH was taken for pie chart).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11785/2026/acp-26-11785-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Quantitative analysis of pH driving factors</title>
      <p id="d2e8153">To quantitatively analyze aerosol pH, the contributions of various influencing factors to aerosol pH and ALWC were further quantified (Figs. 7, S5; Table S2). According to the multiphase buffer theory (Zheng et al., 2020), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> significantly drives the seasonal variation of aerosol pH by influencing pKa*. The results presented in Fig. 7 confirm this assertion, indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a dominant role (22.3 %–31.6 %) in driving the seasonal variation of aerosol pH. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> favored enhanced aerosol acidity in winter and spring, while the opposite trend was observed in summer and autumn. Moreover, NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emerged as a key factor influencing aerosol pH during winter and autumn, contributing between 22.9 % and 44.9 %. When the higher winter NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentration (pH<sub>1</sub>) was replaced with the lower concentration observed in spring (pH<sub>2</sub>), while maintaining other winter parameters constant, the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (pH<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pH<sub>1</sub>), indicating increased acidity. In the winter, the widespread use of coal for heating leads to significant emissions of acidic gases (Wang et al., 2016). The decrease in NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations may exacerbate acidification through two mechanisms. On one hand, lower NH<sub>3</sub> weakens the buffering capacity of the NH<sub>3</sub>/NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conjugate pair, which is the dominant alkaline buffer system for aerosol pH (Zheng et al., 2020). Less NH<sub>3</sub> is thus available to neutralize H<sup>+</sup> from SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> oxidation, making the system more vulnerable to acidification. On the other hand, reduced NH<sub>3</sub> disturbs the gas-particle equilibrium between particulate ammonium nitrate and gaseous ammonia along with nitric acid. According to Le Chatelier's principle, a decrease in gas-phase NH<sub>3</sub> drives this equilibrium toward dissociation, promoting the decomposition of particulate NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> and releasing additional gaseous nitric acid (Guo et al., 2018). These two processes together contribute to a decline in system pH. In contrast, the opposite trend is observed in the autumn. The primary influencing factors in spring were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 31.9 % and NVCs at 24.7 %, while in summer, they were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 33.8 % and RH at 17.8 %. These results suggest that NVCs, represented by Ca<sup>2+</sup>, are rich in alkaline mineral components and can enhance acid-neutralizing capacity, making them important drivers of aerosol pH variations in spring. In summer, RH alters aerosol acidity by affecting the deliquescence of hygroscopic particles, thereby serving as a key driver of aerosol pH variations. This observation is consistent with findings from studies conducted in other northern Chinese cities (Ding et al., 2019). Moreover, the combined effects of factor interactions and model nonlinearity, represented by the residual contribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pH<sub>others</sub>) are also significant, particularly in autumn, where they contributed 26.6 % to aerosol pH variation.</p>
      <p id="d2e8412">Throughout the observation period, chemical components contributed an average of 47.7 % annually to pH, while meteorological factors contributed 35.7 %, highlighting the greater impact of chemical components over meteorological factors. This characteristic significantly differs from that observed in southeastern coastal regions of China. For example, studies conducted in Xiamen and Guangzhou have demonstrated that the contribution of meteorological factors frequently surpasses that of chemical components. This difference arises from regional characteristics. In coastal areas, meteorological factors, including RH and sea-land breezes, exhibit significant variability, while the chemical composition remains relatively stable, rendering meteorological conditions predominant. Conversely, in inland semi-arid regions, chemical components such as NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and dust-derived Ca<sup>2+</sup> exhibit pronounced seasonal fluctuations, resulting in a greater dominance of chemical factors (Jia et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2025). Seasonally, chemical components were more influential in winter (58.7 %), spring (42.7 %), and autumn (49.2 %). Conversely, meteorological factors displayed their most significant impact in summer, with a contribution rate reaching 51.6 %, thus serving as the primary driver of pH variation during this season.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e8445">This study evaluates the aerosol acidity across four seasons in the Guanzhong region of China and quantitatively analyzes the factors contributing to seasonal pH variations. Over the study period, PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the study area was generally weakly alkaline, with an annual mean aerosol pH of 3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0. This trend corresponds with the seasonal changes in PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical composition and meteorological conditions. Aerosol pH increased alongside rising PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, ranging from 2–5 (average: 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9) on clean days to 3–6 (4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5) on polluted and heavily polluted days. Sensitivity analysis and quantitative analysis indicated that NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH, and T are key drivers driving pH across all seasons. T emerged as the primary driver of seasonal pH fluctuations (contributing 22.3 %–31.6 %), with NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> playing a significant role in autumn and winter (contributing 22.9 %–44.9 %), while Ca<sup>2+</sup> in spring and RH in summer acted as specific driving factor for those seasons. pH showed higher sensitivity to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> not only displayed substantial buffering capacity on pH but also, upon conversion to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the particle phase, enhanced particle hygroscopicity, resulting in increased ALWC with higher NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentrations. Meteorological conditions, beyond chemical components, exerted a non-linear regulatory influence on acidity. During winter, spring, and autumn, aerosol pH initially decreases and subsequently increases with rising RH, exhibiting an inflection point within the RH range of 60 %–85 %. This behavior might be related to the explosive growth in ALWC that occurs when the predominant hygroscopic components, primarily NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> and (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, reach their mixed deliquescence point. Our results discovered the main driving factors of aerosol acidity and alkalinity in the Guanzhong Plain, which would be helpful for deeply understanding the heterogenous formation of atmospheric secondary aerosols in the semi-arid region.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8651">The data in this study are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18455742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18455742</ext-link> (Wang et al., 2026).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e8657">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11785-2026-supplement" xlink:title="">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11785-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e8666">Jianjun Li conceived and designed the study, and the revision of the manuscript. Qian Wang conducted the literature search, performed sample and data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. Xiao Guo, Minxia Shen, Yali Liu, Yifan Zhang, Lu Li, Weining Qi, Yue Cao, Shicong Li, Zhuoer Dong and Wenting Dai collected particulate samples and supervised the experiments. All authors provided critical feedback on the manuscript and approved the final version.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e8672">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e8678">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e8684">This work was supported by the program from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42577120), the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (2025JC-YBQN-450) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42407156). Jianjun Li also acknowledged the support of the Youth Innovation Promotion Association Chinese Academy of Sciences.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e8689">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42577120), the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (grant no. 2025JC-YBQN-450), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42407156).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e8695">This paper was edited by Benjamin A Nault and reviewed by four anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Brook, R., Wiebe, A. H., Woodhouse, A., Audette, V., Piechowski, M., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., and Dloughy, F.: Temporal and spatial relationships in fine particle strong acidity, sulphate, PM<sub>10</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> across multiple Canadian locations, Atmos. Environ., 31, 4223–4236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00248-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00248-3</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Chen, G., Fan, X., Lin, Z., Ji, X., Chen, Z., Xu, L., and Chen, J.: Driving factors and photochemical impacts of Cl<sub>2</sub> in coastal atmosphere of southeast China, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01022-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-025-01022-y</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Clegg, S. L., Brimblecombe, P., and Wexler, A. S.: Thermodynamic model of the system H<sup>+</sup>-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-Na<sup>+</sup>-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-Cl<sup>−</sup>-H<sub>2</sub>O at 298.15 K, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 2155–2171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp973043j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp973043j</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Cui, H., Du, Y., Zhang, H., Deng, M., Zhang, Q., Chen, W., Su, S., Li, X., Sarkar, S., Yang, L., Wang, X., and Jia, S.: A quantitative study on the influencing pathways of aerosol acidity: the non-neglectable role of non-ideality, Atmos. Environ., 354, 121256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121256" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121256</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Ding, J., Zhao, P., Su, J., Dong, Q., Du, X., and Zhang, Y.: Aerosol pH and its driving factors in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7939–7954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7939-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7939-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Du, C., Yang, H., Wang, N., Pang, S., and Zhang, Y.: pH effect on the release of NH<sub>3</sub> from the internally mixed sodium succinate and ammonium sulfate aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 220, 117101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117101</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Q., Liu, H., Dai, W., Cao, Y., Shen, M., Liu, Y., Qi, W., Chen, Y., Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Zhou, B., and Li, J.: Comparison of chemical composition and acidity of size-resolved inorganic aerosols at the top and foot of mt. Hua, northwest China: the role of the gas-particle distribution of ammonia, Sci. Total Environ., 905, 166985, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166985" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166985</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup>–Ca<sup>2+</sup>–Mg<sup>2+</sup>–NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Na<sup>+</sup>–SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>−–Cl<sup>−</sup>–H<sub>2</sub>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fu, Z., Cheng, L., Ye, X., Ma, Z., Wang, R., Duan, Y., Tao, J., and Cheng, J.: Characteristics of aerosol chemistry and acidity in shanghai after PM<sub>2.5</sub> satisfied national guideline: Insight into future emission control, Sci. Total Environ., 827, 154319, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154319" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154319</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Xu, L., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M., Capps, S. L., Hite Jr., J. R., Carlton, A. G., Lee, S.-H., Bergin, M. H., Ng, N. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine-particle water and pH in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5211–5228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Sullivan, A. P., Campuzano-Jost, P., Schroder, J. C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Dibb, J. E., Jimenez, J. L., Thornton, J. A., Brown, S. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine particle pH and the partitioning of nitric acid during winter in the northeastern united states, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025311</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Otjes, R., Schlag, P., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Effectiveness of ammonia reduction on control of fine particle nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12241–12256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12241-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-12241-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Huang, R., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K., Cao, J., Han, Y., Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P., Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., Haddad, I. E., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13774</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Jia, S., Chen, W., Zhang, Q., Krishnan, P., Mao, J., Zhong, B., Huang, M., Fan, Q., Zhang, J., Chang, M., Yang, L., and Wang, X.: A quantitative analysis of the driving factors affecting seasonal variation of aerosol pH in Guangzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ., 725, 138228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138228" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138228</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Pozzer, A., and Lelieveld, J.: How alkaline compounds control atmospheric aerosol particle acidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14983–15001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14983-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-14983-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Krotkov, N. A., McLinden, C. A., Li, C., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Marchenko, S. V., Swartz, W. H., Bucsela, E. J., Joiner, J., Duncan, B. N., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Levelt, P. F., Fioletov, V. E., Dickerson, R. R., He, H., Lu, Z., and Streets, D. G.: Aura OMI observations of regional SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> pollution changes from 2005 to 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4605–4629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Qiu, Y., Shen, L., Zhai, S., Bates, K. H., Sulprizio, M. P., Song, S., Lu, X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Lee, H. C., and Kuk, S. K.: Ozone pollution in the north China plain spreading into the late-winter haze season, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2015797118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015797118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2015797118</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Liu, H., Feng, Q., Huang, Y., Wu, F., Liu, Y., Shen, M., Guo, X., Dai, W., Qi, W., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Wang, Q., Zhou, B., and Li, J.: Composition and size distribution of wintertime inorganic aerosols at ground and alpine regions of northwest China, Chinese Chem. Lett., 35, 109636, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109636" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109636</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Liu, M., Song, Y., Zhou, T., Xu, Z., Yan, C., Zheng, M., Wu, Z., Hu, M., Wu, Y., and Zhu, T.: Fine particle pH during severe haze episodes in northern China, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 5213–5221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL073210</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Liu, M., Huang, X., Song, Y., Tang, J., Cao, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Xu, T., Kang, L., Cai, X., Zhang, H., Yang, F., Wang, H., Yu, J. Z., Lau, A. K., He, L., Huang, X., Duan, L., Ding, A., Xue, L., Gao, J., Liu, B., and Zhu, T.: Ammonia emission control in China would mitigate haze pollution and nitrogen deposition, but worsen acid rain, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 7760–7765, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814880116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1814880116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Liu, M., Liu, Z., Wang, J., Chen, W., Feng, T., Pan, T., Yuan, B., Huang, S., Shao, M., Hu, M., Wang, X., and Hu, W.: The variation, source, and environmental impact of chloride across China: summarized field results based on the aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD043275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD043275" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD043275</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Liu, P., Zhao, X., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Wang, J., Xue, L., Chen, J., and Mu, Y.: Fine particle pH and its influencing factors during summer at Mt. Tai: comparison between mountain and urban sites, Atmos. Environ., 261, 118607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118607</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Liu, P., Chen, H., Song, Y., Xue, C., Ye, C., Zhao, X., Zhang, C., Liu, J., and Mu, Y.: Atmospheric ammonia in the rural North China Plain during wintertime: Variations, sources, and implications for HONO heterogeneous formation, Sci. Total Environ., 861, 160768, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160768" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160768</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Jiang, Y., Qi, W., Shen, M., Li, L., Wang, Q., Dai, W., and Li, J.: Chemical characteristics of wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> in background region of northwest China during urban emission reduction, Iscience, 28, 113528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113528" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.isci.2025.113528</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Mao, I., Lin, C, Lin, C., Chen, Y., Sung, F., and Chen, M.: Exposure of acid aerosol for schoolchildren in metropolitan Taipei, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5622–5629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.054</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Mao, M., Rao, L., Jiang, H., He, S., and Zhang, X.: Air pollutants in metropolises of eastern coastal China, Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 19, 15332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215332" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/ijerph192215332</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Meng, Z., Xu, X., Lin, W., Ge, B., Xie, Y., Song, B., Jia, S., Zhang, R., Peng, W., Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Yang, W., and Zhao, H.: Role of ambient ammonia in particulate ammonium formation at a rural site in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 167–184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-167-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-167-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Nah, T., Lam, Y. H., Yang, J., and Yang, L.: Long-term trends and sensitivities of PM<sub>2.5</sub> pH and aerosol liquid water to chemical composition changes and meteorological parameters in Hong Kong, south China: insights from 10-year records from three urban sites, Atmos. Environ., 302, 119725, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119725</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat. Geochem., 4, 123–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1009604003981</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Niu, X., Cao, J., Shen, Z., Ho, S. S. H., Tie, X., Zhao, S., Xu, H., Zhang, T., and Huang, R.: PM<sub>2.5</sub> from the Guanzhong Plain: chemical composition and implications for emission reductions, Atmos. Environ., 147, 458–469, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.029</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Paglione, M., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Tarozzi, L., Manarini, F., Gilardoni, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., Bacco, D., Trentini, A., Pandis, S. N., and Nenes, A.: Historical changes in seasonal aerosol acidity in the po valley (Italy) as inferred from fog water and aerosol measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 7307–7315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c00651</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Alexander, B., Ault, A. P., Barth, M. C., Clegg, S. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Fahey, K. M., Hennigan, C. J., Herrmann, H., Kanakidou, M., Kelly, J. T., Ku, I.-T., McNeill, V. F., Riemer, N., Schaefer, T., Shi, G., Tilgner, A., Walker, J. T., Wang, T., Weber, R., Xing, J., Zaveri, R. A., and Zuend, A.: The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4809–4888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Rengarajan, R., Sudheer, A., and Sarin, M.: Aerosol acidity and secondary organic aerosol formation during wintertime over urban environment in western India, Atmos. Environ., 45, 1940–1945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.026</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Saraswati, Sharma, S., Saxena, M., and Mandal, T.: Characteristics of gaseous and particulate ammonia and their role in the formation of secondary inorganic particulate matter at Delhi, India, Atmos. Res., 218, 34–49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.11.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.11.010</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Thornton, J., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Lee, B., Schroder, J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J., Guo, H., Sullivan, A., Weber, R., Green, J., Fiddler, M., Bililign, S., Campos, T., Stell, M., Weinheimer, A., Montzka, D., and Brown, S.: Chemical feedbacks weaken the wintertime response of particulate sulfate and nitrate to emissions reductions over the eastern United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 8110–8115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803295115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1803295115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Shen, M., Li, J., Liu, Y., Dai, W., Wang, G., Qi, W., Chen, Y., Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Cao, Y., Feng, Q., Su, H., and Cao, J.: Comparison of acidity and chemical composition of summertime cloud water and aerosol at an alpine site in northwest China: Implications for the neutral property of clouds in the free troposphere, Sci. Total Environ., 925, 171775, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171775</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Shi, G., Xu, J., Shi, X., Liu, B., Bi, X., Xiao, Z., Chen, K., Wen, J., Dong, S., Tian, Y., Feng, Y., Yu, H., Song, S., Zhao, Q., Gao, J., and Russell, A. G.: Aerosol pH dynamics during haze periods in an urban environment in China: use of detailed, hourly, speciated observations to study the role of ammonia availability and secondary aerosol formation and urban environment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 9730–9742, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029976</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Shi, Z., Bonneville, S., Krom, M. D., Carslaw, K. S., Jickells, T. D., Baker, A. R., and Benning, L. G.: Iron dissolution kinetics of mineral dust at low pH during simulated atmospheric processing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 995–1007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-995-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-995-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Song, S., Nenes, A., Gao, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, P., Shao, J., Ye, D., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Liu, B., and McElroy, M.: Thermodynamic Modeling Suggests Declines in Water Uptake and Acidity of Inorganic Aerosols in Beijing Winter Haze Events during 2014/2015–2018/2019, Environ. Sci. Technol., 6, 752–760, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00621</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Su, H., Zhang, T., Liu, S., Qu, Y., Li, H., Zhou, J., Zhao, Z., Wang, Q., Li, L., Shen, M., and Chen, S.: Growth of nitrate contribution to aerosol pollution during wintertime in Xi'an, northwest China: Formation mechanism and effects of NH<sub>3</sub>, Particuology, 87, 303–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2023.09.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.partic.2023.09.014</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Su, J., Zhao, P., Ge, S., and Ding, J.: Aerosol liquid water content of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and its influencing factors in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 839, 156342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156342" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156342</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J., and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Tan, T., Hu, M., Li, M., Guo, Q., Wu, Y., Fang, X., Gu, F., Wang, Y., and Wu, Z.: New insight into PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution patterns in Beijing based on one-year measurement of chemical compositions, Sci. Total Environ., 621, 734–743, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.208</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Tang, I.: Chemical and size effects of hygroscopic aerosols on light scattering coefficients. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 19245–19250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD03003</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Wu, Y., Deng, Y., Hu, B., and Zhou, Z.: Thermodynamic regulation of aerosol pH by temperature and humidity: the role of gas-particle partitioning of semi-volatile inorganic species in a subtropical region, Environ. Res., 286, 122727, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.122727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envres.2025.122727</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Tao, Y. and Murphy, J. G.: The sensitivity of PM2.5 acidity to meteorological parameters and chemical composition changes: 10-year records from six Canadian monitoring sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9309–9320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9309-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-9309-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin, Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P., Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B., Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P., Duce, R., Kolb, C., and Molina, M.: Persistent sulfate formation from London fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616540113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Q., Guo, Xiao., Shen, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Qi, W., Cao, Y., Li, S., Dong, Z., and Dai, W.: Measurement report: quantitative analysis of aerosol acidity and its driving factors in guanzhong area, northwest China, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18455742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18455742</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Wang, R., Wang, J., Wang, Y., McPherson Donahue, N., Tang, R., Dong, Z., Li, X., Wang, L., Han, Y., and Cao, J.: The seasonal variation, characteristics and secondary generation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Xi'an, China, especially during pollution events, Environ. Res., 212, 113388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113388" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envres.2022.113388</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Wei, Y., Wang, S., Jiang, N., Zhang, R., and Hao, Q.: Comparative multi-model study of PM<sub>2.5</sub> acidity trend changes in ammonia-rich regions in winter: based on a new ammonia concentration assessment method, J. Hazard. Mater., 458, 131970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131970" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131970</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Wang, G., Li, J., Li, J., Cao, C., Ge, S., Xie, Y., Chen, J., Li, X., Xue, G., Wang, X., Zhao, Z., and Cao, F.: The characteristics of atmospheric brown carbon in Xi'an, inland China: sources, size distributions and optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2017–2030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Xie, Y., Lu, H., Yi, A., Zhang, Z., Zheng, N., Fang, X., and Xiao, H.: Characterization and source analysis of water–soluble ions in PM<sub>2.5</sub> at a background site in central China, Atmos. Res., 239, 104881, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104881</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Xu, K., Yin, L., Chen, Q., Liao, D., Ji, X., Zhang, K., Wu, Y., Xu, L., Li, M., Fan, X., Zhang, F., Huang, Z., Chen, J., and Hong, Y.: Quantitative analysis of influencing factors to aerosol pH and its responses to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> pollution in a coastal city, J. Environ. Sci., 151, 284–297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.044</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Ye, X., Tao, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, R., Li, Q., Yang, X., and Chen, J.: Size-fractionated water-soluble ions during autumn and winter: Insights into volatile ammonium formation mechanisms in Shanghai, a megacity of China, Atmos. Environ., 2, 100011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100011</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, B., Shen, H., Liu, P., Guo, H., Hu, Y., Chen, Y., Xie, S., Xi, Z., Skipper, T. N., and Russell, A. G.: Significant contrasts in aerosol acidity between China and the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8341–8356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8341-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-8341-2021</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, Q., Shen, Z., Lei, Y., Zhang, T., and Zhang, R.: Optical properties and source identification of black carbon and brown carbon: Comparison of winter and summer haze episodes in Xi'an, northwest China, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 21, 2058–2069, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R., Han, Y., Shi, A., Sun, X., Yan, X., Huang, Y., and Wang, Y.: Characteristics of ambient ammonia and its effects on particulate ammonium in winter of urban Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 62828–62838, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14108-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-021-14108-w</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, T., Shen, Z., Su, H., Liu, S., Zhou, J., Zhao, Z., Wang, Q., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Cao, J. J.: Effects of aerosol water content on the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol during a winter heavy PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution episode in Xi'an, China, Atmos. Environ., 252, 118304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118304</ext-link>, 2021c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Cai, J., Wang, S., He, K., and Zheng, M.: Review of receptor-based source apportionment research of fine particulate matter and its challenges in China, Sci. Total Environ., 586, 917–929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.071</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, G., Su, H., Wang, S., Andreae, M., Pöschl, U., and Cheng, Y.: Multiphase buffer theory explains contrasts in atmospheric aerosol acidity, Science, 369, 1374–1377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aba3719</ext-link>, 2020. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, G., Su, H., and Cheng, Y.: Role of carbon dioxide, ammonia, and organic acids in buffering atmospheric acidity: The distinct contribution in clouds and aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 12571–12582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c09851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.2c09851</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, M., Zheng, G., Wang, H., Qiao, L., Zhu, S., Huang, D., An, J., Lou, S., Tao, S., Wang, Q., Yan, R., Ma, Y., Chen, C., Cheng, Y., Su, H., and Huang, C.: Long-term trends and drivers of aerosol pH in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13833–13844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13833-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13833-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Measurement Report: Quantitative analysis of aerosol acidity and its driving factors in Guanzhong area, Northwest China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brook, R., Wiebe, A. H., Woodhouse, A., Audette, V., Piechowski, M., Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., and Dloughy, F.: Temporal and spatial relationships in fine particle strong acidity, sulphate, PM<sub>10</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> across multiple Canadian locations, Atmos. Environ., 31, 4223–4236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00248-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00248-3</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, G., Fan, X., Lin, Z., Ji, X., Chen, Z., Xu, L., and Chen, J.: Driving factors and photochemical impacts of Cl<sub>2</sub> in coastal atmosphere of southeast China, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01022-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01022-y</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clegg, S. L., Brimblecombe, P., and Wexler, A. S.: Thermodynamic model of the system H<sup>+</sup>-NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-Na<sup>+</sup>-SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup>-H<sub>2</sub>O at 298.15 K, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 2155–2171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp973043j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp973043j</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cui, H., Du, Y., Zhang, H., Deng, M., Zhang, Q., Chen, W., Su, S., Li, X., Sarkar, S., Yang, L., Wang, X., and Jia, S.: A quantitative study on the influencing pathways of aerosol acidity: the non-neglectable role of non-ideality, Atmos. Environ., 354, 121256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121256" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121256</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, J., Zhao, P., Su, J., Dong, Q., Du, X., and Zhang, Y.: Aerosol pH and its driving factors in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7939–7954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7939-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7939-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Du, C., Yang, H., Wang, N., Pang, S., and Zhang, Y.: pH effect on the release of NH<sub>3</sub> from the internally mixed sodium succinate and ammonium sulfate aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 220, 117101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117101</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, Q., Liu, H., Dai, W., Cao, Y., Shen, M., Liu, Y., Qi, W., Chen, Y., Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Zhou, B., and Li, J.: Comparison of chemical composition and acidity of size-resolved inorganic aerosols at the top and foot of mt. Hua, northwest China: the role of the gas-particle distribution of ammonia, Sci. Total Environ., 905, 166985, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166985" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166985</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup>–Ca<sup>2+</sup>–Mg<sup>2+</sup>–NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–Na<sup>+</sup>–SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>–NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>−–Cl<sup>−</sup>–H<sub>2</sub>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fu, Z., Cheng, L., Ye, X., Ma, Z., Wang, R., Duan, Y., Tao, J., and Cheng, J.: Characteristics of aerosol chemistry and acidity in shanghai after PM<sub>2.5</sub> satisfied national guideline: Insight into future emission control, Sci. Total Environ., 827, 154319, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154319" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154319</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, H., Xu, L., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M., Capps, S. L., Hite Jr., J. R., Carlton, A. G., Lee, S.-H., Bergin, M. H., Ng, N. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine-particle water and pH in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5211–5228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, H., Sullivan, A. P., Campuzano-Jost, P., Schroder, J. C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Dibb, J. E., Jimenez, J. L., Thornton, J. A., Brown, S. S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine particle pH and the partitioning of nitric acid during winter in the northeastern united states, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025311" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025311</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, H., Otjes, R., Schlag, P., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Effectiveness of ammonia reduction on control of fine particle nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12241–12256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12241-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12241-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, R., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K., Cao, J., Han, Y., Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P., Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., Haddad, I. E., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jia, S., Chen, W., Zhang, Q., Krishnan, P., Mao, J., Zhong, B., Huang, M., Fan, Q., Zhang, J., Chang, M., Yang, L., and Wang, X.: A quantitative analysis of the driving factors affecting seasonal variation of aerosol pH in Guangzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ., 725, 138228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138228" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138228</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Pozzer, A., and Lelieveld, J.: How alkaline compounds control atmospheric aerosol particle acidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14983–15001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14983-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14983-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krotkov, N. A., McLinden, C. A., Li, C., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Marchenko, S. V., Swartz, W. H., Bucsela, E. J., Joiner, J., Duncan, B. N., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Levelt, P. F., Fioletov, V. E., Dickerson, R. R., He, H., Lu, Z., and Streets, D. G.: Aura OMI observations of regional SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> pollution changes from 2005 to 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4605–4629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4605-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Qiu, Y., Shen, L., Zhai, S., Bates, K. H., Sulprizio, M. P., Song, S., Lu, X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Lee, H. C., and Kuk, S. K.: Ozone pollution in the north China plain spreading into the late-winter haze season, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2015797118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015797118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015797118</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, H., Feng, Q., Huang, Y., Wu, F., Liu, Y., Shen, M., Guo, X., Dai, W., Qi, W., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Wang, Q., Zhou, B., and Li, J.: Composition and size distribution of wintertime inorganic aerosols at ground and alpine regions of northwest China, Chinese Chem. Lett., 35, 109636, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109636" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109636</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, M., Song, Y., Zhou, T., Xu, Z., Yan, C., Zheng, M., Wu, Z., Hu, M., Wu, Y., and Zhu, T.: Fine particle pH during severe haze episodes in northern China, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 5213–5221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073210</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, M., Huang, X., Song, Y., Tang, J., Cao, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Xu, T., Kang, L., Cai, X., Zhang, H., Yang, F., Wang, H., Yu, J. Z., Lau, A. K., He, L., Huang, X., Duan, L., Ding, A., Xue, L., Gao, J., Liu, B., and Zhu, T.: Ammonia emission control in China would mitigate haze pollution and nitrogen deposition, but worsen acid rain, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 7760–7765, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814880116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814880116</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, M., Liu, Z., Wang, J., Chen, W., Feng, T., Pan, T., Yuan, B., Huang, S., Shao, M., Hu, M., Wang, X., and Hu, W.: The variation, source, and environmental impact of chloride across China: summarized field results based on the aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD043275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD043275" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD043275</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, P., Zhao, X., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Wang, J., Xue, L., Chen, J., and Mu, Y.: Fine particle pH and its influencing factors during summer at Mt. Tai: comparison between mountain and urban sites, Atmos. Environ., 261, 118607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118607" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118607</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, P., Chen, H., Song, Y., Xue, C., Ye, C., Zhao, X., Zhang, C., Liu, J., and Mu, Y.: Atmospheric ammonia in the rural North China Plain during wintertime: Variations, sources, and implications for HONO heterogeneous formation, Sci. Total Environ., 861, 160768, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160768" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160768</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Jiang, Y., Qi, W., Shen, M., Li, L., Wang, Q., Dai, W., and Li, J.: Chemical characteristics of wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> in background region of northwest China during urban emission reduction, Iscience, 28, 113528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113528" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113528</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mao, I., Lin, C, Lin, C., Chen, Y., Sung, F., and Chen, M.: Exposure of acid aerosol for schoolchildren in metropolitan Taipei, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5622–5629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.054</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mao, M., Rao, L., Jiang, H., He, S., and Zhang, X.: Air pollutants in metropolises of eastern coastal China, Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 19, 15332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215332" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215332</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meng, Z., Xu, X., Lin, W., Ge, B., Xie, Y., Song, B., Jia, S., Zhang, R., Peng, W., Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Yang, W., and Zhao, H.: Role of ambient ammonia in particulate ammonium formation at a rural site in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 167–184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-167-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-167-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nah, T., Lam, Y. H., Yang, J., and Yang, L.: Long-term trends and sensitivities of PM<sub>2.5</sub> pH and aerosol liquid water to chemical composition changes and meteorological parameters in Hong Kong, south China: insights from 10-year records from three urban sites, Atmos. Environ., 302, 119725, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119725" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119725</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat. Geochem., 4, 123–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niu, X., Cao, J., Shen, Z., Ho, S. S. H., Tie, X., Zhao, S., Xu, H., Zhang, T., and Huang, R.: PM<sub>2.5</sub> from the Guanzhong Plain: chemical composition and implications for emission reductions, Atmos. Environ., 147, 458–469, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.029</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paglione, M., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Tarozzi, L., Manarini, F., Gilardoni, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., Bacco, D., Trentini, A., Pandis, S. N., and Nenes, A.: Historical changes in seasonal aerosol acidity in the po valley (Italy) as inferred from fog water and aerosol measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 7307–7315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00651" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00651</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Alexander, B., Ault, A. P., Barth, M. C., Clegg, S. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Fahey, K. M., Hennigan, C. J., Herrmann, H., Kanakidou, M., Kelly, J. T., Ku, I.-T., McNeill, V. F., Riemer, N., Schaefer, T., Shi, G., Tilgner, A., Walker, J. T., Wang, T., Weber, R., Xing, J., Zaveri, R. A., and Zuend, A.: The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4809–4888, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rengarajan, R., Sudheer, A., and Sarin, M.: Aerosol acidity and secondary organic aerosol formation during wintertime over urban environment in western India, Atmos. Environ., 45, 1940–1945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.026</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saraswati, Sharma, S., Saxena, M., and Mandal, T.: Characteristics of gaseous and particulate ammonia and their role in the formation of secondary inorganic particulate matter at Delhi, India, Atmos. Res., 218, 34–49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.11.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.11.010</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Thornton, J., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Lee, B., Schroder, J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J., Guo, H., Sullivan, A., Weber, R., Green, J., Fiddler, M., Bililign, S., Campos, T., Stell, M., Weinheimer, A., Montzka, D., and Brown, S.: Chemical feedbacks weaken the wintertime response of particulate sulfate and nitrate to emissions reductions over the eastern United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 8110–8115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803295115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803295115</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shen, M., Li, J., Liu, Y., Dai, W., Wang, G., Qi, W., Chen, Y., Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Cao, Y., Feng, Q., Su, H., and Cao, J.: Comparison of acidity and chemical composition of summertime cloud water and aerosol at an alpine site in northwest China: Implications for the neutral property of clouds in the free troposphere, Sci. Total Environ., 925, 171775, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171775" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171775</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, G., Xu, J., Shi, X., Liu, B., Bi, X., Xiao, Z., Chen, K., Wen, J., Dong, S., Tian, Y., Feng, Y., Yu, H., Song, S., Zhao, Q., Gao, J., and Russell, A. G.: Aerosol pH dynamics during haze periods in an urban environment in China: use of detailed, hourly, speciated observations to study the role of ammonia availability and secondary aerosol formation and urban environment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 9730–9742, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029976" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029976</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, Z., Bonneville, S., Krom, M. D., Carslaw, K. S., Jickells, T. D., Baker, A. R., and Benning, L. G.: Iron dissolution kinetics of mineral dust at low pH during simulated atmospheric processing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 995–1007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-995-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-995-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, S., Nenes, A., Gao, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, P., Shao, J., Ye, D., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Liu, B., and McElroy, M.: Thermodynamic Modeling Suggests Declines in Water Uptake and Acidity of Inorganic Aerosols in Beijing Winter Haze Events during 2014/2015–2018/2019, Environ. Sci. Technol., 6, 752–760, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00621" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00621</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, H., Zhang, T., Liu, S., Qu, Y., Li, H., Zhou, J., Zhao, Z., Wang, Q., Li, L., Shen, M., and Chen, S.: Growth of nitrate contribution to aerosol pollution during wintertime in Xi'an, northwest China: Formation mechanism and effects of NH<sub>3</sub>, Particuology, 87, 303–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2023.09.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2023.09.014</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, J., Zhao, P., Ge, S., and Ding, J.: Aerosol liquid water content of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and its influencing factors in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 839, 156342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156342" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156342</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. F., Fu, P. Q., Yang, T., Jiang, Q., Dong, H. B., Li, J., and Jia, J. J.: Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4577–4592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4577-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tan, T., Hu, M., Li, M., Guo, Q., Wu, Y., Fang, X., Gu, F., Wang, Y., and Wu, Z.: New insight into PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution patterns in Beijing based on one-year measurement of chemical compositions, Sci. Total Environ., 621, 734–743, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.208</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, I.: Chemical and size effects of hygroscopic aerosols on light scattering coefficients. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 19245–19250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03003</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, J., Wu, Y., Deng, Y., Hu, B., and Zhou, Z.: Thermodynamic regulation of aerosol pH by temperature and humidity: the role of gas-particle partitioning of semi-volatile inorganic species in a subtropical region, Environ. Res., 286, 122727, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.122727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.122727</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, Y. and Murphy, J. G.: The sensitivity of PM2.5 acidity to meteorological parameters and chemical composition changes: 10-year records from six Canadian monitoring sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9309–9320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9309-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9309-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin, Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P., Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B., Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P., Duce, R., Kolb, C., and Molina, M.: Persistent sulfate formation from London fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Q., Guo, Xiao., Shen, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Qi, W., Cao, Y., Li, S., Dong, Z., and Dai, W.: Measurement report: quantitative analysis of aerosol acidity and its driving factors in guanzhong area, northwest China, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18455742" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18455742</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Z., Wang, R., Wang, J., Wang, Y., McPherson Donahue, N., Tang, R., Dong, Z., Li, X., Wang, L., Han, Y., and Cao, J.: The seasonal variation, characteristics and secondary generation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Xi'an, China, especially during pollution events, Environ. Res., 212, 113388, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113388" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113388</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, Y., Wang, S., Jiang, N., Zhang, R., and Hao, Q.: Comparative multi-model study of PM<sub>2.5</sub> acidity trend changes in ammonia-rich regions in winter: based on a new ammonia concentration assessment method, J. Hazard. Mater., 458, 131970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131970" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131970</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, C., Wang, G., Li, J., Li, J., Cao, C., Ge, S., Xie, Y., Chen, J., Li, X., Xue, G., Wang, X., Zhao, Z., and Cao, F.: The characteristics of atmospheric brown carbon in Xi'an, inland China: sources, size distributions and optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2017–2030, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xie, Y., Lu, H., Yi, A., Zhang, Z., Zheng, N., Fang, X., and Xiao, H.: Characterization and source analysis of water–soluble ions in PM<sub>2.5</sub> at a background site in central China, Atmos. Res., 239, 104881, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104881</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, K., Yin, L., Chen, Q., Liao, D., Ji, X., Zhang, K., Wu, Y., Xu, L., Li, M., Fan, X., Zhang, F., Huang, Z., Chen, J., and Hong, Y.: Quantitative analysis of influencing factors to aerosol pH and its responses to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> pollution in a coastal city, J. Environ. Sci., 151, 284–297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.044</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ye, X., Tao, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, R., Li, Q., Yang, X., and Chen, J.: Size-fractionated water-soluble ions during autumn and winter: Insights into volatile ammonium formation mechanisms in Shanghai, a megacity of China, Atmos. Environ., 2, 100011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100011</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, B., Shen, H., Liu, P., Guo, H., Hu, Y., Chen, Y., Xie, S., Xi, Z., Skipper, T. N., and Russell, A. G.: Significant contrasts in aerosol acidity between China and the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8341–8356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8341-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8341-2021</a>, 2021a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Q., Shen, Z., Lei, Y., Zhang, T., and Zhang, R.: Optical properties and source identification of black carbon and brown carbon: Comparison of winter and summer haze episodes in Xi'an, northwest China, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 21, 2058–2069, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, R., Han, Y., Shi, A., Sun, X., Yan, X., Huang, Y., and Wang, Y.: Characteristics of ambient ammonia and its effects on particulate ammonium in winter of urban Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 62828–62838, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14108-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14108-w</a>, 2021b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, T., Shen, Z., Su, H., Liu, S., Zhou, J., Zhao, Z., Wang, Q., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Cao, J. J.: Effects of aerosol water content on the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol during a winter heavy PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution episode in Xi'an, China, Atmos. Environ., 252, 118304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118304</a>, 2021c.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Cai, J., Wang, S., He, K., and Zheng, M.: Review of receptor-based source apportionment research of fine particulate matter and its challenges in China, Sci. Total Environ., 586, 917–929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.071</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, G., Su, H., Wang, S., Andreae, M., Pöschl, U., and Cheng, Y.: Multiphase buffer theory explains contrasts in atmospheric aerosol acidity, Science, 369, 1374–1377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3719" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3719</a>, 2020.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, G., Su, H., and Cheng, Y.: Role of carbon dioxide, ammonia, and organic acids in buffering atmospheric acidity: The distinct contribution in clouds and aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 12571–12582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c09851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c09851</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, M., Zheng, G., Wang, H., Qiao, L., Zhu, S., Huang, D., An, J., Lou, S., Tao, S., Wang, Q., Yan, R., Ma, Y., Chen, C., Cheng, Y., Su, H., and Huang, C.: Long-term trends and drivers of aerosol pH in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13833–13844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13833-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13833-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
