<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-11771-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Measurement report: Dust Transport and Local Anthropogenic Emissions Differently Shape Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particles in an Industrial Urban Atmosphere</article-title><alt-title>Dust Transport and Anthropogenic Emissions Shape Urban INPs</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Jiawei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7760-9369</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Jingchuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Jie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-1110</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Zeyu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Wenxu</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6748-430X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qiu</surname><given-names>Yanting</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-8621</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Junrui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Man</surname><given-names>Ruiqi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zong</surname><given-names>Taomou</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Yuechen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Zhijun</given-names></name>
          <email>zhijunwu@pku.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Ning</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Min</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-9123</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Research Center for Atmospheric Research (IJRC), Institute of Carbon Neutrality, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Zhijun Wu (zhijunwu@pku.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>11771</fpage><lpage>11784</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Jiawei Yang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11771/2026/acp-26-11771-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11771/2026/acp-26-11771-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11771/2026/acp-26-11771-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11771/2026/acp-26-11771-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e217">Atmospheric ice-nucleating particles (INPs) are vital for cloud formation, yet the importance of INPs from anthropogenic sources remains poorly understood. We conducted a month-long winter field campaign in Taiyuan (China), a heavily industrialized city, to quantify INP concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ice nucleation active site density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of immersion mode INPs, alongside particle size distributions and chemical compositions. Our results indicate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.05 to 13.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at and above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the identified desert dust event, both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 6.64–8.41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were substantially higher than during the remaining observation periods without clear desert-dust intrusion (0.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), highlighting the strong influence of long-range transported desert dust. In contrast, during pollution periods, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed only weak correlations with urban aerosol components such as sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and organic carbon (OC) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Positive matrix factorization (PMF) identified five PM<sub>2.5</sub> source factors: industrial emissions, dust-related particles, secondary aerosols, coal combustion and traffic emissions, and fireworks. Although these factors dominated the PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass, they showed no significant covariation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During this winter campaign, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability in Taiyuan was characterized by strong enhancement during the identified desert dust event and weak associations with the major PM<sub>2.5</sub> source factors during the remaining observation periods.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42375093</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University</funding-source>
<award-id>25001</award-id>
<award-id>25015</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e574">Atmospheric ice-nucleating particles (INPs) play a critical role in cloud formation, cloud radiative properties and precipitation through heterogeneous ice nucleation (Lohmann and Feichter, 2005; IPCC, 2014; Lohmann et al., 2016). Although INPs constitute a minute fraction of ambient aerosols under natural conditions (approximately 1 in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ambient particles in the free troposphere, DeMott et al., 2010), their ability to modulate cloud properties and lifetimes has received substantial scientific interest. Heterogeneous ice nucleation is generally understood to occur through four mechanisms: deposition ice nucleation, condensation freezing, immersion freezing and contact freezing (Hoose and Möhler, 2012; Vali et al., 2015). In addition, recent studies have suggested that under water-subsaturated conditions, pore condensation and freezing (PCF) may provide a more realistic description of atmospheric ice nucleation than classical deposition nucleation in some cases (Marcolli, 2014; David et al., 2019). Among these, immersion freezing has been widely reported to be the most important ice nucleation mechanism for mixed-phase clouds (Ansmann et al., 2008; Murray et al., 2012; Westbrook and Illingworth, 2013).</p>
      <p id="d2e588">The urban atmosphere is characterized by intensive anthropogenic activities, diverse aerosol emission sources, elevated aerosol loadings, and complex chemical compositions. However, the key factors controlling atmospheric INP concentrations in such environments, including aerosol composition, size, and source characteristics, remain uncertain (Kanji et al., 2017). Previous studies in Beijing and Tokyo demonstrated that INP concentrations often show no significant correlations with black carbon (BC) or PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass, or the number concentration of particles larger than 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during air pollution episodes (Chen et al., 2018; Tobo et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022). This suggests that typical urban pollution aerosols are generally inefficient INPs.</p>
      <p id="d2e610">However, this observation contrasts with laboratory and field evidence showing that some anthropogenic particles can exhibit immersion-mode ice-nucleating activity. These include certain fly ash, metallic/mineral particles, and other industrial dusts associated with coal combustion and manufacturing activities (Toll et al., 2024). By contrast, the contribution of soot particles to atmospheric INPs in the immersion mode has been suggested to be negligible in many cases (Kanji et al., 2020). Moreover, biomass burning represents another potential source, with agricultural fires near Mexico City reported to induce freezing at temperatures above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, likely due to the presence of associated biological particles (McCluskey et al., 2014; Jahn et al., 2020; Cabrera-Segoviano et al., 2022). The complexity of urban INPs is further exemplified by observations in New Delhi, where INP concentrations correlated moderately (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with BC during fog episodes, indicating that particle composition and meteorological conditions may modulate INP activity (Wagh et al., 2021). This gap between laboratory potential and field observations indicates that urban INP variability may be governed by specific high-efficiency contributors rather than total aerosol mass or number concentrations. Therefore, mineral dust and biological particles, which have long been established as the most potent atmospheric INPs, require careful consideration even in heavily industrialized areas.</p>
      <p id="d2e645">Mineral dust is widely recognized as the most important atmospheric INP due to its vast global emissions, estimated at up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Engelstaedter et al., 2006). Its intrinsically high ice-nucleating activity at temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is primarily attributed to specific mineral components such as K-feldspar, which has been systematically identified as a key active species in laboratory settings (Atkinson et al., 2013; Augustin-Bauditz et al., 2014; Zolles et al., 2015). In the context of East Asia, mineral dust transported from northwestern deserts can substantially enhance INP concentrations in downwind urban areas, with ice-nucleating efficiencies comparable to those reported for Saharan dust (Price et al., 2018; Reicher et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2021). Furthermore, the influence of dust in urban environments is not limited to long-range natural transport; anthropogenic dust may also contribute to atmospheric INPs in some urban and peri-urban regions, although direct field evidence remains limited (Chen et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e696">In comparison to mineral dust, aerosols of biological origin, such as pollen, fungal spores, proteins, and other macromolecular organics can nucleate ice at relatively warmer temperatures, often above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pummer et al., 2015; Polen et al., 2016; Kanji et al., 2017). While these bioaerosols may be less abundant by mass than mineral dust, their exceptional ice-nucleating efficiency means that even a small population can dominate the urban INP budget at the early stages of cloud glaciation.</p>
      <p id="d2e719">Although considerable progress has been made in identifying both natural and anthropogenic sources of atmospheric INPs, their formation pathways and source attributions in urban environments remain poorly constrained due to the complex mixture of aerosol types and variable emission patterns. To address this gap, a comprehensive winter field campaign was conducted in Taiyuan, a representative industrial city in northern China, over a one-month period. Taiyuan frequently experiences severe particulate pollution and episodic dust events, positioning it as an ideal location to investigate the combined effects of anthropogenic and natural emissions. In this study, the number concentration of immersion mode INP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the number of active sites per unit surface area of INPs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were measured under mixed-phase cloud conditions. The freezing experiments were continued until all droplets were frozen, but because most samples were already fully or nearly fully frozen by about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the INP data presented and discussed in this study mainly span the temperature range from about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Source apportionment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> using a positive matrix factorization (PMF) model enabled the identification of major emission sources and their temporal variations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sampling</title>
      <p id="d2e819">Taiyuan is a major industrial city in northern China, often experiencing elevated concentrations and enrichment factors (EFs) of PM<sub>2.5</sub>-bound heavy metals, influenced by local emissions, regional transport, and complex terrain (Li et al., 2021). A winter observation campaign was conducted from 3 December 2023 to 14 January 2024, coinciding with the centralized heating season characterized by intensive coal combustion. The sampling site (37.88° N, 112.55° E; approximately 800 m a.s.l.) is located on the rooftop (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m above ground level) of a four-story building at the Taiyuan Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau. Situated near Taoyuan 3rd Alley, this site is representative of a typical central urban environment. Although it is removed from direct major industrial point sources, it remains suitable for monitoring urban fine particulate pollution driven by mixed anthropogenic activities.</p>
      <p id="d2e841">Key atmospheric pollutants were continuously monitored at the station, including concentrations of water-soluble ions, heavy metals, elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC), gas concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO), particulate matter concentrations (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>), together with meteorological parameters (wind speed, wind direction, temperature, relative humidity, and atmospheric pressure). In addition, INP filter samples were collected using a two-channel sampler equipped with two parallel filter channels from 4 December 2023 to 5 January 2024. Polycarbonate filters (47 mm, Nuclepore Track-Etch Membrane, 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pore size, Whatman) were used for sampling. The sampler was operated without a size-selective inlet. The sampling flow rate was maintained at 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by a mass flow controller (MFC), with a 24 h sampling duration. Considering flow fluctuations and filter switching time, the total sampled air volume for each filter was approximately 8000 L. Except for the filter samples, all observation data were recorded as hourly averages.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Particle mass and size distribution measurement</title>
      <p id="d2e938">Mass concentrations of particulate matter (PM) with aerodynamic diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) smaller than 2.5 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>, respectively) were measured by a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) monitor.</p>
      <p id="d2e980">Two scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) systems were employed to measure particle number size distributions in the 2.02–514 nm range during the campaign, while the range of data used in this study was 3–453 nm. The first system consisted of a TSI Classifier 3080 with Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA) 3085 and Condensation Particle Counter (CPC) 3776, while the second system included a TSI Classifier 3082 with DMA 3081 and CPC 3772. Sample humidity was regulated using a Nafion™ membrane dryer (Perma Pure, MD-700-24F-3) to prevent water vapor condensation. Multiple charging corrections were applied during data processing (Wiedensohler, 1988).</p>
      <p id="d2e983">An Optical Particle Counter (Aerosol Spectrometer and Dust Monitor 1.108, Grimm Aerosol Technik) was used to obtain the particle number size distribution (PNSD) of particles ranging from 0.5 to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in optical-equivalent diameters. To merge the OPC data with the SMPS measurements and calculate particle surface area on the same diameter basis, the OPC size distribution was converted to mobility diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Estimating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from optical-equivalent diameter typically requires knowledge of particle complex refractive index and morphological parameters (e.g., dynamic shape factor) (Peters et al., 2006). Moreover, when converting to dm, we assumed an effective particle density of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a shape factor of unity. Previous sensitivity calculations showed that changing the particle density from 1.5 to 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the dynamic shape factor from 1.1 to 1.4 can lead to a factor of 1.07–2.36 difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chen et al., 2021). This suggests that diameter conversion may introduce an uncertainty of approximately a factor of 2 in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly in the coarse-mode size range (Huang et al., 2021). A more exact uncertainty could not be assigned because particle refractive index, morphology, and particle-specific effective density were not independently measured. The OPC data were combined with the SMPS measurements to construct a merged particle size distribution (SMPS: 3–453 nm; OPC: 0.5–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which was further used to estimate the total particle surface area for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Particle chemical composition</title>
      <p id="d2e1104">The water-soluble inorganic ions in PM<sub>2.5</sub> were measured in-situ using a Monitor for AeRosols and Gases in ambient Air (MARGA 1S; Metrohm AG, Switzerland). The analysis focused on major inorganic ions, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In parallel, the MARGA simultaneously measured the gaseous pollutants including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and HCl. EC and OC concentrations were determined using a Carbonaceous Aerosol Speciation System (CASS; Aerosol d.o.o., Slovenia, EU) (Rumsey et al., 2014; Rumsey and Walker, 2016; Wan et al., 2022), following the thermal–optical transmittance method. Elemental composition of aerosol samples was analyzed by online X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) (Marguí et al., 2022), allowing quantification of a wide range of elements including light metals (K, Ca, etc.), metalloids (As, Se, etc.), and heavy metals (Zn, Pb, Cu, Hg, etc.).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Ice-nucleating particle (INP) concentration</title>
      <p id="d2e1273"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were determined using the Peking University Ice Nucleation Array (PKU-INA), a cold-stage-based ice nucleation instrument (Chen et al., 2018, 2021). Each filter was fully immersed in 20 mL of double-distilled water (resistivity: 18.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and extracted using an ultrasonic shaker for 30 min. Ultrasonic extraction is an effective method for removing particles from filters (Ardon-Dryer and Levin, 2014; Chen et al., 2018; Reicher et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2021), although it may alter the bioactivity of proteins (De Leo et al., 2017). To minimize ultrasound-induced heating, the extraction was performed in a water bath with ice. The resulting suspension was dispensed into 90 droplets (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> each) on a hydrophobic glass slide. A metal spacer was placed on the slide to assist in droplet positioning and to suppress the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen process (Jung et al., 2012). A top glass was placed on the spacer to seal the droplets. The cold stage was first cooled from room temperature to 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and then at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until all droplets were frozen. The image of each droplet was recorded by a CCD camera every 6 s, corresponding to a temperature resolution of 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These images were later analyzed by customized software to identify the phase transition of each droplet by its brightness change upon freezing. High-purity dry nitrogen was used as sheath gas to prevent condensation and frost formation. The temperature uncertainty at the applied cooling rate was within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chen et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d2e1398">The cumulative number of ice-active sites per unit droplet volume above temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated according to Vali et al. (2015):

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">of</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">water</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fraction of droplets frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of each pipetted droplet (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study). Combined with the total sampling volume, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per unit volume of sampled air is calculated as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M101" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total volume of sampled air per droplet converted to standard conditions (0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1013 hPa) during each sample collection period. To quantify and compare the ice-nucleating activity of aerosol particles of different sizes, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Vali et al., 2015), i.e., the cumulative ice-nucleation-active-site surface density (Connolly et al., 2009; Niedermeier et al., 2011; Hoose and Möhler, 2012), is calculated from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M106" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total surface area of the particles per unit volume of sampled air, derived from size distribution measurements of the particles. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation, the merged SMPS–OPC particle number size distributions were converted to the same standard-condition air-volume basis as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1013 hPa) using concurrent temperature and pressure data. The particle surface area was then estimated from the converted size distributions expressed in mobility diameter.</p>
      <p id="d2e1743">The main source of uncertainty in the experimental results stems from the statistical representativeness of the droplets analyzed relative to the entire particle suspension. Due to the low ambient concentrations of INPs, the number of INPs present in the resulting particle suspension is typically small. As each droplet has a volume of only 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, individual droplets may not adequately reflect the true particle distribution in the bulk extract. Moreover, the total number of droplets tested per sample (90 in this study) imposes a statistical limitation. To account for this, confidence intervals for the estimated INP concentration per droplet (and per unit sample volume) were calculated following the statistical approach described in previous studies (Barker, 2002; O'Sullivan et al., 2018), as shown in Eq. (4):

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M112" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the number of INPs per droplet, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of droplets analyzed, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the standard normal score corresponding to the desired confidence level (1.96 for a 95 % confidence interval).</p>
      <p id="d2e1893">For each aerosol sample, the parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the confidence intervals for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were calculated individually. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ice</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was derived from cold-stage measurements, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained from recorded sampling volumes, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated from the standard-condition combined particle size distributions measured by the SMPS and OPC. The uncertainty in ns arises from both the statistical uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the uncertainty in the particle surface area concentration used for normalization. The latter is mainly associated with the SMPS–OPC merging and diameter conversion in the coarse-mode range, as discussed in Sect. 2.2.1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>2.2.4</label><title>Air mass backward trajectory analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e2033">Backward trajectory analysis and visualization were performed using the MeteoInfoMap program (Wang, 2014), which is based on the HYSPLIT4 (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) model developed by the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA) Air Resources Laboratory. The analysis used GDAS (Global Data Assimilation System, 1°, global) meteorological data from NOAA (Stein et al., 2015). Trajectories were calculated with a duration of 72 h and an interval of 6 h between each trajectory, arriving at an altitude of 850 m above sea level (a.s.l.), which approximately represents the actual sampling inlet height, considering a ground elevation of about 800 m a.s.l. and a rooftop sampling height of about 20 m above ground level.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS5">
  <label>2.2.5</label><title>Positive matrix factorization (PMF)</title>
      <p id="d2e2045">The Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model was applied to analyze the sources of PM<sub>2.5</sub>. PMF is a widely used receptor model for source apportionment. It can identify the composition and contribution of various sources. The model assumes that species emitted from the same source exhibit strong correlations, enabling the extraction of meaningful factors from measured concentration data (Karagulian et al., 2015; US EPA, 2015).</p>
      <p id="d2e2057">Given an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>  consisting of concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical species across <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> samples, PMF decomposes the matrix into two positive matrices – factor contributions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and factor profiles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) – according to Eq. (5):

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M132" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of factors, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the sample index, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the species index. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured concentration of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the contribution of factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass fraction of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the residuals. Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are constrained to be non-negative.</p>
      <p id="d2e2311">To obtain the optimal solution, PMF minimizes an objective function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 6) using uncertainty estimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and non-negativity constraints on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M152" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2436">The uncertainty <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated following the EPA PMF 5.0 User Guide (US EPA, 2015) as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M154" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MDL</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MDL</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ef</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MDL</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MDL</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured concentration of a given species, MDL is the method detection limit, and ef is the analytical uncertainty, typically between 0.05 and 0.2. In this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ef</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was applied.</p>
      <p id="d2e2567">EPA PMF 5.0 software was employed for source apportionment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the study region. The specific datasets and their sources used for PMF analysis are described in Sect. 3.4. To determine the optimal number of factors, 4–7 factors were tested with 20 iterative runs each, and the solution with the most physically interpretable source profiles and lowest residuals was selected for final analysis (US EPA, 2015). Consequently, a five-factor solution was determined to be the optimal choice.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Overview of INP temporal variability and aerosol characteristics</title>
      <p id="d2e2596">Figure 1 presents the temporal evolution of atmospheric INP concentrations and relevant aerosol parameters during the observation period in Taiyuan, including size-segregated particle number concentrations, carbonaceous components (OC and EC), as well as mass concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>, and water-soluble ions. Daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at different temperatures are shown in Fig. 1a (data for 15, 16, and 19 December are missing). At and above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, representing the total INP concentration active at and above this temperature, ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a campaign mean of 1.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The corresponding 95 % confidence intervals for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at selected temperatures are provided in Table S3 in the Supplement. Correspondingly, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at and above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 3) spanned <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a campaign mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2830">Time series of <bold>(a)</bold> temperature-resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> size-resolved particle number concentrations, <bold>(c)</bold> mass concentrations of OC and EC, and <bold>(d)</bold> mass concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> and major water-soluble ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured by MARGA during the observation period. In panel <bold>(a)</bold>, gray triangles (D15(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) represent values calculated using the parameterization of DeMott et al. (2015), shown here mainly as a dust-based reference for comparison with the observed day-to-day temporal variation in INP concentrations. Special periods are indicated by dashed boundary lines across all panels and colored arrows at the top of panel <bold>(a)</bold>: the orange arrow denotes the desert dust period, the gray arrows denote pollution periods, and the red arrow denotes the fireworks event. In panel <bold>(a)</bold>, white horizontal lines indicate samples for which all droplets had already frozen before the colder temperature intervals were reached. Under these conditions, the cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeded the quantifiable range of the assay and therefore could not be plotted as a finite value. In panel <bold>(b)</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to particles from 3 nm to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the concentrations integrated over 0.5–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The inset in panel <bold>(d)</bold> shows the full PM<sub>10</sub> peak on 5–6 December. Ion data before approximately 7 December 2023 were unavailable and are therefore not shown in panel <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11771/2026/acp-26-11771-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3136">Several distinct events can be identified throughout the campaign, as highlighted in Fig. 1 by dashed boundary lines and colored arrows. The first event (5–9 December, marked by the orange arrow in Fig. 1a) was characterized by a sharp increase in coarse-mode particle concentrations, represented here by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from the merged SMPS–OPC size distribution (Figs. 1b, S1b, and S2 in the Supplement). During this episode, the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased to 5.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was approximately 2.7 times higher than the average concentration during the remaining observation periods (2.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A peak daily concentration of 12.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was recorded on 6 December, accompanied by a steep rise in PM<sub>10</sub> that reached nearly 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1b and d).</p>
      <p id="d2e3251">72 h back trajectory analysis by HYSPLIT model confirmed that air masses during this period predominantly originated from the Taklamakan, Gurbantünggüt, or Badain Jaran Deserts in northwestern China, with trajectory paths highly overlapping the desert regions (Fig. S3 in the Supplement). This pattern is consistent with desert dust transport events previously observed in northern China (Chen et al., 2021), further supporting the identification of this period as a desert dust intrusion event. Wind rose analysis (Fig. S6 in the Supplement) shows that both the dust-event and non-desert-dust periods were dominated by northerly flow, whereas the dust-event period exhibited a more concentrated northerly flow pattern. This serves as supplementary meteorological support for the event classification. Given the well-established high ice-nucleating activity of mineral dust, this episode is identified as a desert dust-intrusion event responsible for the pronounced enhancement in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially at temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The remaining observation periods are not assumed to be free of mineral dust influence; rather, no similarly clear desert dust intrusion signature was identified outside this event. Further discussion of its characteristics and implications is provided in Sect. 3.2.</p>
      <p id="d2e3287">Other episodes (13–14, 18, and 28–30 December, marked by the gray arrows in Fig. 1a) were characterized by simultaneous increases in sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and organic carbon, accompanied by elevated PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> levels (Fig. 1c and d). This indicates the influence of air pollution driven by regional secondary aerosol accumulation under stagnant winter meteorology. Moderate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases were observed during the earlier two episodes (13–14 and 18 December), suggesting that secondary aerosol formation may indirectly modulate ice-nucleating activity through coating or mixing with pre-existing ice-active particles. The late-December event showed no corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement despite high PM levels, indicating that aerosol mass concentration alone may not determine INP abundance. This contrast emphasizes that particle composition and surface properties, rather than overall pollution intensity, govern INP activity during pollution episodes characterized by enhanced secondary inorganic and organic aerosol accumulation (Chen et al., 2018; Wagh et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d2e3330">Around 2 January 2024 (marked by the red arrow in Fig. 1a), a short-lived pollution event occurred, accompanied by sharp increases in PM mass and concurrent peaks in K, OC, EC (Fig. 1c and d), which are consistent with firework emissions during New Year celebrations. Despite elevated particle concentrations and combustion-related aerosol components, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained low, suggesting that freshly emitted anthropogenic particles, including black carbon and other combustion products, are relatively inefficient as INPs, consistent with previous observations that even locally high concentrations of combustion aerosols contribute little to atmospheric ice-nucleating activity (Adams et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Comparison with previous urban studies and parameterizations</title>
      <p id="d2e3352">Figure 2  compares the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study with values reported previously. All samples in Taiyuan activated before <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the most active samples initiating freezing near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied by more than two orders of magnitude among different samples, particularly in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range, where values ranged from below 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to above 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Such variability primarily reflects the influence of the desert dust intrusion identified earlier (highlighted in darker orange in Fig. 2), during which enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed due to long-range transport of natural mineral particles. However, the enhanced warm-temperature INP activity during this episode may not be fully attributable to mineral dust alone. During East Asian dust events, Chen et al. (2021) showed that heat-sensitive INPs made substantial contributions at relatively warm temperatures. Similarly, Hu et al. (2023) reported enhanced warm-temperature INP activity during spring dust transport in Beijing and suggested, based on heat-treatment analysis, that transported dust particles may be mixed with heat-sensitive, potentially biological components. Together, these studies support the possibility of similar heat-sensitive contributions during the Taiyuan dust episode. In the present study, however, no heat-treatment analysis was performed; therefore, such a contribution can only be inferred and cannot be directly assessed.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3490">Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained in this study with those reported in previous studies. Pale-yellow circles represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from this study during non-desert-dust periods, while orange triangles denote data collected during the identified desert dust event. Blue circles denote wintertime urban INP observations in Beijing measured by INDA during November–December 2016 (Chen et al., 2018), and black squares denote wintertime urban INP observations in Tokyo during December 2016–February 2017 (Tobo et al., 2020). Purple circles indicate data from Sisal, Mexico (Ladino et al., 2019), and gray circles show anthropogenic-dust samples collected in Beijing (Chen et al., 2024). Solid red and blue lines correspond to parameterizations for Beijing and Huangshan (Bi et al., 2018; Su et al., 2014). The light-gray shaded area shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from precipitation samples (Petters and Wright, 2015).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11771/2026/acp-26-11771-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3532">For the remaining non-desert-dust periods, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Taiyuan was generally higher than wintertime urban observations in Beijing measured by INDA (Chen et al., 2018) and in Tokyo (Tobo et al., 2020) over much of the overlapping temperature range. This difference may be related to the semi-arid setting of Taiyuan and its proximity to the Loess Plateau and northwestern dust source regions, where mineral and resuspended dust particles can provide a more persistent background of coarse-mode aerosol than in the Beijing and Tokyo observations. Consistently, particles larger than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained at appreciable concentrations even outside the identified desert dust event, although no clear desert-dust intrusion signature comparable to the 5–9 December episode was identified. Differences in sampling size range should also be considered, because the Taiyuan INP filters were collected without a size-selective inlet and can be regarded as approximately total suspended particles (TSP), whereas Chen et al. (2018) collected PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples in Beijing. The anthropogenic-dust samples collected in Beijing in summer (Chen et al., 2024) overlap mainly with the lower part of the Taiyuan data. These comparisons suggest the higher Taiyuan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels likely reflect a combination of regional dust influence, local dust-associated coarse particles, seasonal differences, and sampling-size-range differences, rather than a single controlling factor.</p>
      <p id="d2e3577">The linear <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterizations derived from field measurements in Beijing (Bi et al., 2018) and Huangshan (Su et al., 2014) also capture the overall magnitude of the present measurements. Additionally, the gray shaded area denotes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range derived from precipitation samples summarized by Petters and Wright (2015), which is used here as a broad reference for background atmospheric INP abundance. At temperatures warmer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Taiyuan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values fall mostly within this range during the non-desert-dust periods. At colder temperatures, however, the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values exceed this range substantially, suggesting contributions from additional ice-active components active at lower temperatures. Taken together, these features indicate that episodic desert dust transport was associated with the most prominent INP enhancements during this campaign, whereas the remaining variability during the non-desert-dust periods likely reflects a more complex mixture of sources and particle properties that cannot be uniquely resolved by the present dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Characterization of dust INPs</title>
      <p id="d2e3653">During the desert dust event (5–9 December; marked by the orange arrow and dashed boundary lines in Fig. 1a), both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased markedly. At and above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached 13.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaked at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while their mean values rose from 0.61 to 7.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. These coherent increases in concentration and surface-active-site density indicate that the episode was characterized by both an increased abundance of INPs and substantially enhanced intrinsic ice-nucleating activity. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values discussed here were calculated from the standard-condition merged SMPS–OPC size distribution, thereby accounting for contributions from coarse particles in the surface-area estimate. Figure 1a also compares the measurements with the DeMott et al. (2015) parameterization (D15), which links INP concentrations to the number concentration of particles larger than 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and was originally developed for desert dust aerosol. In this study, the D15 values were calculated using the observed particle number concentrations larger than 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and are therefore shown mainly as a dust-based reference. Accordingly, the comparison is most meaningful for the identified dust episode, whereas for the remaining periods it should be interpreted with caution. While D15 captures the correct order of magnitude, it tends to underestimate the INP peak during the desert dust event (5–9 December) and overestimate INP concentrations during the pollution episode (28–30 December). This discrepancy suggests that coarse-particle abundance alone may not fully constrain INP variability in Taiyuan. Particles larger than 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Taiyuan outside the identified desert dust event may differ in source characteristics and ice-nucleating efficiency from those of the highly active desert dust represented by the D15 parameterization. The apparent overestimation by D15 during pollution episodes implies that these coarse particles may possess lower ice-nucleating efficiency than the highly active desert dusts represented by the parameterization. Therefore, while size-based parameterizations provide a useful approximation, incorporating source-specific or compositional factors could further improve INP predictability in such complex industrial-urban environments.</p>
      <p id="d2e3864">Figure 3 compares <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of temperature for desert dust-affected samples (red) with non-desert-dust samples (blue). Across the full temperature range, dust-affected samples exhibit systematically higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than non-desert-dust samples. Between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, desert dust-affected samples exhibited <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values approximately one order of magnitude higher than the most active non-desert-dust samples. In the colder range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), most dust-affected samples fall within about one order of magnitude of the desert-dust parameterizations proposed by Niemand et al. (2012) and Chen et al. (2021), indicating ice-nucleating behavior consistent with long-range transported mineral dust. Considering that Taiyuan is located on the western edge of the North China Plain while Beijing lies farther downwind, dust arriving in Beijing may have experienced a longer transport history and more atmospheric processing. As shown in Fig. 3, the Beijing dust parameterization broadly overlaps with the ns values of the dust samples in this study across the measured temperature range. This comparison is consistent with Chen et al. (2023), who reported observational evidence that atmospheric chemical modification did not suppress the ice nucleation activity of East Asian dust. However, because the present study did not directly characterize the aging state of the dust particles or the specific aging processes involved, this comparison is used only to suggest that strong ice-nucleating activity was retained during the Taiyuan dust episode, rather than to demonstrate or quantify the effect of atmospheric aging.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3963">Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained in this study with those reported in previous studies. Blue and red markers represent the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of samples from this study during non-desert-dust periods and the identified desert dust event, respectively. The  lines show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterizations for dust or individual mineral components reported in previous studies (Atkinson et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2021; Harrison et al., 2019; Niemand et al., 2012). The light-pink dashed line denotes the median trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for urban anthropogenic dust particles in Beijing, digitized from Chen et al. (2024).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11771/2026/acp-26-11771-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4017">It is also noteworthy that at relatively warm temperatures (approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the ambient desert dust samples substantially exceed the parameterizations for pure K-feldspar (Atkinson et al., 2013; Harrison et al., 2019), suggesting that mineralogy alone cannot account for the elevated warm-temperature activity. Previous laboratory and field studies have shown that mineral dust particles can act synergistically with biological macromolecules or cellular fragments, leading to pronounced enhancement of heterogeneous freezing at warmer temperatures (Augustin-Bauditz et al., 2016; O'Sullivan et al., 2016; Yahya et al., 2019). The enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study may therefore reflect the combined influence of mineral dust and potentially co-transported biological INP components, rather than mineral dust alone. The TSP-like sampling configuration may have facilitated retention of such coarse ice-active components, but it cannot by itself explain the selective enhancement observed during the dust event.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Anthropogenic particle pollution and INP variability during non-desert-dust periods</title>
      <p id="d2e4099">The Pearson correlation coefficients between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at different temperatures and various pollutants were calculated for non-desert-dust periods. As shown in Table S1 in the Supplement, only Ca, Co, Ni, and Au exhibited statistically significant correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The mean concentrations of Co, Ni, and Au were all below 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that their correlations are of limited physical relevance. By contrast, Ca averaged about 405 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ng</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but was notably correlated only with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a typical crustal element, Ca is closely linked to particles larger than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chen et al., 2024). Excluding the influence of long-range dust transport, this observation likely points to contributions from local or regional dust-associated particles, such as resuspended soil and fugitive dust.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4215">Daily PM<sub>2.5</sub> source contributions resolved using the PMF model, shown together with the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the non-desert-dust periods. Data from the identified desert dust event are not shown. The samples collected on 13, 14, 21 December and 3, 4 January were fully frozen before <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exceeding the quantifiable range of the assay.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11771/2026/acp-26-11771-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4285">The weak correlations for all pollutants highlight that individual chemical species provide limited explanatory power for INP variability during non-desert-dust periods. This reflects the fact that INPs constitute only a minor and compositionally distinct subset of the total aerosol population, and thus bulk pollutant concentrations are not expected to correlate strongly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To further examine whether the dominant PM<sub>2.5</sub> source factors were associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability during the non-desert-dust periods, PMF analysis was applied to the PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemical composition dataset, resolving five major factors (industry, dust-related particles, secondary aerosols, coal combustion and traffic, and fireworks). The corresponding factor profiles (Fig. S4 in the Supplement) are consistent with the assigned source categories, including crustal tracers in the dust-related factor and Cu–Ba–K enrichment in the fireworks factor. The inter-species correlation patterns shown in Fig. S5 in the Supplement also support these factor assignments. Because the PMF analysis was based on PM<sub>2.5</sub> whereas the INP filter samples can be regarded as approximately TSP, the PMF results are used here only to assess covariation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, rather than to provide direct source apportionment for INPs. Data from the identified desert dust event (5–9 December) are not shown in Fig. 4, because the PMF–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation analysis focused on non-desert-dust periods. The dust-related factor exhibits characteristic signatures of dust-associated particles, including high loadings of Ca and Fe. During the non-desert-dust periods, this factor is interpreted as mainly reflecting local dust-associated particles, such as road dust, fugitive dust from industrial and construction activities, and resuspended soil. This dust-related PM<sub>2.5</sub> factor showed no significant correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the non-desert-dust periods (Table 1), indicating that local dust-associated PM<sub>2.5</sub> variability did not explain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability outside the identified long-range desert dust event. The reconstructed daily PM<sub>2.5</sub> contributions (Fig. 4) provide the temporal context for the subsequent PMF–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation analysis, showing that secondary aerosols and coal/traffic emissions dominated the PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass during much of the non-desert-dust period, whereas fireworks emissions became prominent during the New Year period.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e4434">Pearson correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and concentration contributions of PMF-resolved factors during non-desert-dust periods.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol Source</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearson <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Industry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.264</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.274</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dust related</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.209</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.391</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Secondary aerosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.145</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.554</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coal &amp; Traffic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.035</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.886</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fireworks</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.108</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.661</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4592">To evaluate whether any of these major PM<sub>2.5</sub> sources covaried with INP, Pearson correlations were calculated between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the time series of the PMF factors during non-desert-dust periods (Table 1). All correlations were weak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and statistically insignificant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating that the dominant PM<sub>2.5</sub> source factors did not show clear covariation with INP abundance. Importantly, even during periods with strong increases in secondary inorganic and organic aerosols, such as 13–14 December, 18 December, and 28–30 December, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did not rise proportionally (Fig. 4). This behavior suggests that the observed pollution episodes, which were largely associated with fine-mode secondary aerosol accumulation, were not accompanied by corresponding INP enhancements, consistent with previous urban observations showing weak relationships between INPs and bulk pollution indicators (Chen et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d2e4684">These results suggest that, during non-desert-dust periods of this campaign, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability was not clearly explained by any of the major PMF-resolved source categories. This is consistent with previous observations at urban sites in different regions, where INPs remain scarce and episodic relative to total aerosol loading, and where their variability is often not well explained by the major anthropogenic aerosol components. Similar analyses were also conducted at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S2 in the Supplement). No statistically significant correlations were found between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and any PMF-resolved factor at the examined temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating that this result was not specific to the choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e4801">This study provides a detailed observational assessment of atmospheric INPs in Taiyuan, a heavily industrialized city in North China. By combining freezing assays, aerosol chemical composition, back-trajectory analysis, and PMF analysis, the work characterizes the concentration range, temperature dependence of INP activation, and variability of INPs in an urban environment where such information has been largely absent. The results provide observational constraints on wintertime INP abundance and variability in an industrial urban atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e4804">A key finding of this winter campaign is that the strongest INP enhancements in Taiyuan were associated with episodic long-range desert dust transport. During the 5–9 December desert dust event, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ns increased by up to an order of magnitude and freezing initiated at markedly warmer temperatures. Back trajectories confirmed that these highly active samples were associated with air masses originating from the major desert regions in northwestern China. Comparison with previously reported dust parameterizations indicates that the transported desert dust retained strong ice-nucleating activity during the dust transport episode. The enhanced warm-temperature activity may also reflect the possible contribution of co-transported biological components, although this cannot be directly verified in the absence of heat-treatment analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e4818">In contrast, during the non-desert-dust periods of this campaign, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained relatively low and showed weak correlations with common urban aerosol species. PMF analysis resolved five major PM<sub>2.5</sub> source factors: industrial emissions, dust-related particles, secondary aerosols, coal combustion and traffic emissions, and fireworks, with secondary aerosols and coal/traffic contributions dominating the particle mass. However, none of these PMF-resolved factors showed statistically significant covariation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>INP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the non-desert-dust periods. This suggests that INP abundance during these periods could not be clearly explained by the dominant contributors to PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass.</p>
      <p id="d2e4861">Overall, the observations from this winter campaign indicate that the strongest INP enhancements in Taiyuan were associated with long-range desert dust transport, whereas the remaining INP variability during the non-desert-dust periods reflected more complex influences that were not resolved by the major PM<sub>2.5</sub> source factors considered here. These results provide observational constraints for understanding wintertime urban INPs and for improving their representation in chemical transport and climate models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e4878">The data supporting this study are available from Zenodo at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20232172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20232172</ext-link> (Yang et al., 2026). The dataset includes INP freezing data, temperature-resolved NINP and confidence intervals, particle size distributions and surface area data, auxiliary observations, PMF source contribution data, and HYSPLIT backward trajectory outputs.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e4884">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11771-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11771-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e4893">JY, JingC and ZW designed experiments and methodology. JY, WF, JingC and ZF conducted the field observation. JY, ZW, WF, ZF, TZ, YQ, JunW and RM performed aerosol chemical and size distribution analyses; specifically, YQ was responsible for PMF (Positive Matrix Factorization) analysis, while JunW and RM assisted with offline sampling and chemical component analysis. JY, JieC and JingC calibrated the PKU-INA. TZ and WF provided meteorological data. MH, ZW, YL and NT supervised the study. JY, ZW, JieC and JingC prepared the article with input from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e4899">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e4905">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e4911">We thank Ling Mu, Jiajie Li, Ying Wei, and Chenhui Li (Taiyuan University of Technology) for collecting the offline membrane samples.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e4916">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42375093), the Exploratory Innovation Project of the National Institute of Metrology, China (grant no. AKYCX2512), and the cooperative research programs of the Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Japan (grant nos. 25001 and 25015).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e4922">This paper was edited by Daniel Knopf and reviewed by four anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adams, M. P., Tarn, M. D., Sanchez-Marroquin, A., Porter, G. C. E., O'Sullivan, D., Harrison, A. D., Cui, Z., Vergara-Temprado, J., Carotenuto, F., Holden, M. A., Daily, M. I., Whale, T. F., Sikora, S. N. F., Burke, I. T., Shim, J.-U., McQuaid, J. B., and Murray, B. J.: A Major Combustion Aerosol Event Had a Negligible Impact on the Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particle Population, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032938, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032938" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD032938</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Ansmann, A., Tesche, M., Althausen, D., Müller, D., Seifert, P., Freudenthaler, V., Heese, B., Wiegner, M., Pisani, G., Knippertz, P., and Dubovik, O.: Influence of Saharan dust on cloud glaciation in southern Morocco during the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D04210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008785</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Ardon-Dryer, K. and Levin, Z.: Ground-based measurements of immersion freezing in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5217–5231, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5217-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5217-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12278</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Augustin-Bauditz, S., Wex, H., Kanter, S., Ebert, M., Niedermeier, D., Stolz, F., Prager, A., and Stratmann, F.: The immersion mode ice nucleation behavior of mineral dusts: A comparison of different pure and surface modified dusts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 7375–7382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL061317</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Augustin-Bauditz, S., Wex, H., Denjean, C., Hartmann, S., Schneider, J., Schmidt, S., Ebert, M., and Stratmann, F.: Laboratory-generated mixtures of mineral dust particles with biological substances: characterization of the particle mixing state and immersion freezing behavior, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5531–5543, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5531-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5531-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Barker, L.: A Comparison of Nine Confidence Intervals for a Poisson Parameter When the Expected Number of Events is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Am. Stat., 56, 85–89, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1198/000313002317572736" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1198/000313002317572736</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bi, K., Ma, X., Chen, Y., Fu, S., and Xue, H.: The Observation of Ice-Nucleating Particles Active at Temperatures above–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Its Implication on Ice Formation in Clouds, J. Meteorol. Res.-PRC, 32, 734–743, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7181-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13351-018-7181-z</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cabrera-Segoviano, D., Pereira, D. L., Rodriguez, C., Raga, G. B., Miranda, J., Alvarez-Ospina, H., and Ladino, L. A.: Inter-annual variability of ice nucleating particles in Mexico city, Atmos. Environ., 273, 118964, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.118964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.118964</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Wu, Z., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Grawe, S., Hartmann, M., Pei, X., Liu, Z., Ji, D., and Wex, H.: Ice-nucleating particle concentrations unaffected by urban air pollution in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3523–3539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3523-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3523-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Wu, Z., Chen, J., Reicher, N., Fang, X., Rudich, Y., and Hu, M.: Size-resolved atmospheric ice-nucleating particles during East Asian dust events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3491–3506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3491-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3491-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Wu, Z., Meng, X., Zhang, C., Chen, J., Qiu, Y., Chen, L., Fang, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Gao, J., Li, W., and Hu, M.: Observational Evidence for the Non-Suppression Effect of Atmospheric Chemical Modification on the Ice Nucleation Activity of East Asian Dust, Sci. Total Environ., 861, 160708, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160708" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160708</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Wu, Z., Gong, X., Qiu, Y., Chen, S., Zeng, L., and Hu, M.: Anthropogenic Dust as a Significant Source of Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Urban Environment, Earths Future, 12, e2023EF003738, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023EF003738</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Connolly, P. J., Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Saathoff, H., Burgess, R., Choularton, T., and Gallagher, M.: Studies of heterogeneous freezing by three different desert dust samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2805–2824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>David, R. O., Marcolli, C., Fahrni, J., Qiu, Y., Perez Sirkin, Y. A., Molinero, V., Mahrt, F., Brühwiler, D., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.: Pore condensation and freezing is responsible for ice formation below water saturation for porous particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 8184–8189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813647116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1813647116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>De Leo, V., Catucci, L., Di Mauro, A. E., Agostiano, A., Giotta, L., Trotta, M., and Milano, F.: Effect of ultrasound on the function and structure of a membrane protein: The case study of photosynthetic Reaction Center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Ultrason. Sonochem., 35, 103–111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.09.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.09.007</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D., Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910818107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, R. C., Petters, M. D., Tobo, Y., Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Snider, J. R., Wang, Z., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Integrating laboratory and field data to quantify the immersion freezing ice nucleation activity of mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 393–409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-393-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Engelstaedter, S., Tegen, I., and Washington, R.: North African dust emissions and transport, Earth-Sci. Rev., 79, 73–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.06.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.06.004</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Harrison, A. D., Lever, K., Sanchez-Marroquin, A., Holden, M. A., Whale, T. F., Tarn, M. D., McQuaid, J. B., and Murray, B. J.: The ice-nucleating ability of quartz immersed in water and its atmospheric importance compared to K-feldspar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11343–11361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11343-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11343-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hu, Y., Tian, P., Huang, M., Bi, K., Schneider, J., Umo, N. S., Ullmerich, N., Höhler, K., Jing, X., Xue, H., Ding, D., Liu, Y., Leisner, T., and Möhler, O.: Characteristics of ice-nucleating particles in Beijing during spring: A comparison study of measurements between the suburban and a nearby mountain area, Atmos. Environ., 293, 119451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119451</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Adebiyi, A. A., Formenti, P., and Kok, J. F.: Linking the Different Diameter Types of Aspherical Desert Dust Indicates That Models Underestimate Coarse Dust Emission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL092054</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Ed.): Clouds and Aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 571–658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Jahn, L. G., Polen, M. J., Jahl, L. G., Brubaker, T. A., Somers, J., and Sullivan, R. C.: Biomass combustion produces ice-active minerals in biomass-burning aerosol and bottom ash, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 21928–21937, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922128117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1922128117</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Jung, S., Tiwari, M. K., and Poulikakos, D.: Frost halos from supercooled water droplets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 16073–16078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206121109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1206121109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteor. Mon., 58, 1.1–1.33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kanji, Z. A., Welti, A., Corbin, J. C., and Mensah, A. A.: Black Carbon Particles Do Not Matter for Immersion Mode Ice Nucleation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086764, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086764" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL086764</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Karagulian, F., Belis, C. A., Dora, C. F. C., Prüss-Ustün, A. M., Bonjour, S., Adair-Rohani, H., and Amann, M.: Contributions to cities' ambient particulate matter (PM): A systematic review of local source contributions at global level, Atmos. Environ., 120, 475–483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.087</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Ladino, L. A., Raga, G. B., Alvarez-Ospina, H., Andino-Enríquez, M. A., Rosas, I., Martínez, L., Salinas, E., Miranda, J., Ramírez-Díaz, Z., Figueroa, B., Chou, C., Bertram, A. K., Quintana, E. T., Maldonado, L. A., García-Reynoso, A., Si, M., and Irish, V. E.: Ice-nucleating particles in a coastal tropical site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6147–6165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6147-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6147-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Li, F., Yan, J., Wei, Y., Zeng, J., Wang, X., Chen, X., Zhang, C., Li, W., Chen, M., and Lü, G.: PM<sub>2.5</sub>-bound heavy metals from the major cities in China: Spatiotemporal distribution, fuzzy exposure assessment and health risk management, J. Clean. Prod., 286, 124967, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124967" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124967</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U., Lüönd, F., and Mahrt, F.: An Introduction to Clouds: From the Microscale to Climate, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087513" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781139087513</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Marcolli, C.: Deposition nucleation viewed as homogeneous or immersion freezing in pores and cavities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2071–2104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Marguí, E., Queralt, I., and de Almeida, E.: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for environmental analysis: Basic principles, instrumentation, applications and recent trends, Chemosphere, 303, 135006, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135006</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>McCluskey, C. S., DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Levin, E. J. T., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, A. P., Hill, T. C. J., Nakao, S., Carrico, C. M., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Characteristics of atmospheric ice nucleating particles associated with biomass burning in the US: Prescribed burns and wildfires, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 10458–10470, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021980" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021980</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Murray, B. J., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J. D., and Webb, M. E.: Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6519–6554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35200A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C2CS35200A</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Niedermeier, D., Hartmann, S., Clauss, T., Wex, H., Kiselev, A., Sullivan, R. C., DeMott, P. J., Petters, M. D., Reitz, P., Schneider, J., Mikhailov, E., Sierau, B., Stetzer, O., Reimann, B., Bundke, U., Shaw, R. A., Buchholz, A., Mentel, T. F., and Stratmann, F.: Experimental study of the role of physicochemical surface processing on the IN ability of mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11131–11144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11131-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-11131-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P., Klein, H., Bingemer, H., DeMott, P., Skrotzki, J., and Leisner, T.: A Particle-Surface-Area-Based Parameterization of Immersion Freezing on Desert Dust Particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Ross, J. F., and Webb, M. E.: The adsorption of fungal ice-nucleating proteins on mineral dusts: a terrestrial reservoir of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7879–7887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7879-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7879-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>O'Sullivan, D., Adams, M. P., Tarn, M. D., Harrison, A. D., Vergara-Temprado, J., Porter, G. C. E., Holden, M. A., Sanchez-Marroquin, A., Carotenuto, F., Whale, T. F., McQuaid, J. B., Walshaw, R., Hedges, D. H. P., Burke, I. T., Cui, Z., and Murray, B. J.: Contributions of biogenic material to the atmospheric ice-nucleating particle population in North Western Europe, Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 13821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31981-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-31981-7</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Peters, T. M., Ott, D., and O'Shaughnessy, P. T.: Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 Portable Aerosol Spectrometer to the TSI 3321 Aerodynamic Particle Sizer for Dry Particles, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 50, 843–850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mel067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/annhyg/mel067</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Wright, T. P.: Revisiting ice nucleation from precipitation samples, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8758–8766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065733" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL065733</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Polen, M., Lawlis, E., and Sullivan, R. C.: The unstable ice nucleation properties of Snomax<sup>®</sup> bacterial particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 11666–11678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025251" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025251</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Price, H. C., Baustian, K. J., McQuaid, J. B., Blyth, A., Bower, K. N., Choularton, T., Cotton, R. J., Cui, Z., Field, P. R., Gallagher, M., Hawker, R., Merrington, A., Miltenberger, A., Neely III, R. R., Parker, S. T., Rosenberg, P. D., Taylor, J. W., Trembath, J., Vergara-Temprado, J., Whale, T. F., Wilson, T. W., Young, G., and Murray, B. J.: Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Dusty Tropical Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2175–2193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027560" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD027560</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pummer, B. G., Budke, C., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Niedermeier, D., Felgitsch, L., Kampf, C. J., Huber, R. G., Liedl, K. R., Loerting, T., Moschen, T., Schauperl, M., Tollinger, M., Morris, C. E., Wex, H., Grothe, H., Pöschl, U., Koop, T., and Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.: Ice nucleation by water-soluble macromolecules, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4077–4091, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Reicher, N., Budke, C., Eickhoff, L., Raveh-Rubin, S., Kaplan-Ashiri, I., Koop, T., and Rudich, Y.: Size-dependent ice nucleation by airborne particles during dust events in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11143–11158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11143-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11143-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Rumsey, I. C. and Walker, J. T.: Application of an online ion-chromatography-based instrument for gradient flux measurements of speciated nitrogen and sulfur, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2581–2592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2581-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-2581-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Rumsey, I. C., Cowen, K. A., Walker, J. T., Kelly, T. J., Hanft, E. A., Mishoe, K., Rogers, C., Proost, R., Beachley, G. M., Lear, G., Frelink, T., and Otjes, R. P.: An assessment of the performance of the Monitor for AeRosols and GAses in ambient air (MARGA): a semi-continuous method for soluble compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5639–5658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5639-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5639-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Su, H., Yin, Y., Lu, C., Jiang, H., and Yang, L.: Development of new diffusion cloud chamber type and its observation study of ice nuclei in the Huangshan area, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 38, 386–398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2013.12211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2013.12211</ext-link>, 2014 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Tobo, Y., Uetake, J., Matsui, H., Moteki, N., Uji, Y., Iwamoto, Y., Miura, K., and Misumi, R.: Seasonal Trends of Atmospheric Ice Nucleating Particles Over Tokyo, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD033658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033658</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Toll, V., Rahu, J., Keernik, H., Trofimov, H., Voormansik, T., Manshausen, P., Hung, E., Michelson, D., Christensen, M. W., Post, P., Junninen, H., Murray, B. J., Lohmann, U., Watson-Parris, D., Stier, P., Donaldson, N., Storelvmo, T., Kulmala, M., and Bellouin, N.: Glaciation of liquid clouds, snowfall, and reduced cloud cover at industrial aerosol hot spots, Science, 386, 756–762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl0303" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.adl0303</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>US EPA: EPA Positive Matrix Factorization 5.0 Fundamentals and User Guide, <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.epa.gov/air-research/epa-positive-matrix-factorization-50-fundamentals-and-user-guide">https://www.epa.gov/air-research/epa-positive-matrix-factorization-50-fundamentals-and-user-guide</ext-link> (last access: 10 October 2025), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.: Technical Note: A proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10263–10270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Wagh, S., Singh, P., Ghude, S. D., Safai, P., Prabhakaran, T., and Kumar, P. P.: Study of ice nucleating particles in fog-haze weather at New Delhi, India: A case of polluted environment, Atmos. Res., 259, 105693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105693" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105693</ext-link>, 2021. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Wan, Z., Song, K., Zhu, W., Yu, Y., Wang, H., Shen, R., Tan, R., Lv, D., Gong, Y., Yu, X., Chen, S., Zeng, L., Lou, S., Yu, Y., and Guo, S.: A Closure Study of Secondary Organic Aerosol Estimation at an Urban Site of Yangtze River Delta, China, Atmosphere-Basel, 13, 1679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101679" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos13101679</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. Q.: MeteoInfo: GIS software for meteorological data visualization and analysis, Meteorol. Appl., 21, 360–368, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/met.1345</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Westbrook, C. D. and Illingworth, A. J.: The formation of ice in a long-lived supercooled layer cloud, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 2209–2221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2096" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2096</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Wiedensohler, A.: An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range, J. Aerosol Sci., 19, 387–389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(88)90278-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(88)90278-9</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Yahya, R. Z., Arrieta, J. M., Cusack, M., and Duarte, C. M.: Airborne Prokaryote and Virus Abundance Over the Red Sea, Front. Microbiol., 10, 1112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2019.01112</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Yang, J., Chen, J., Chen, J., Feng, Z., Fang, W., Qiu, Y., Wang, J., Man, R., Zong, T., Liu, Y., Wu, Z., Tang, N., and Hu, M.: Dataset for atmospheric ice-nucleating particles in urban Taiyuan during winter 2023–2024, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20232172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20232172</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, C., Wu, Z., Chen, J., Chen, J., Tang, L., Zhu, W., Pei, X., Chen, S., Tian, P., Guo, S., Zeng, L., Hu, M., and Kanji, Z. A.: Ice-nucleating particles from multiple aerosol sources in the urban environment of Beijing under mixed-phase cloud conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7539–7556, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7539-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-7539-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Zolles, T., Burkart, J., Häusler, T., Pummer, B., Hitzenberger, R., and Grothe, H.: Identification of Ice Nucleation Active Sites on Feldspar Dust Particles, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 2692–2700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509839x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp509839x</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Measurement report: Dust Transport and Local Anthropogenic Emissions Differently Shape Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particles in an Industrial Urban Atmosphere</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Adams, M. P., Tarn, M. D., Sanchez-Marroquin, A., Porter, G. C. E., O'Sullivan, D., Harrison, A. D., Cui, Z., Vergara-Temprado, J., Carotenuto, F., Holden, M. A., Daily, M. I., Whale, T. F., Sikora, S. N. F., Burke, I. T., Shim, J.-U., McQuaid, J. B., and Murray, B. J.:
A Major Combustion Aerosol Event Had a Negligible Impact on the Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particle Population, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032938, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032938" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032938</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Ansmann, A., Tesche, M., Althausen, D., Müller, D., Seifert, P., Freudenthaler, V., Heese, B., Wiegner, M., Pisani, G., Knippertz, P., and Dubovik, O.:
Influence of Saharan dust on cloud glaciation in southern Morocco during the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D04210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008785</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Ardon-Dryer, K. and Levin, Z.:
Ground-based measurements of immersion freezing in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5217–5231, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5217-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5217-2014</a>, 2014. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.:
The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Augustin-Bauditz, S., Wex, H., Kanter, S., Ebert, M., Niedermeier, D., Stolz, F., Prager, A., and Stratmann, F.:
The immersion mode ice nucleation behavior of mineral dusts: A comparison of different pure and surface modified dusts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 7375–7382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061317" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061317</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Augustin-Bauditz, S., Wex, H., Denjean, C., Hartmann, S., Schneider, J., Schmidt, S., Ebert, M., and Stratmann, F.:
Laboratory-generated mixtures of mineral dust particles with biological substances: characterization of the particle mixing state and immersion freezing behavior, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5531–5543, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5531-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5531-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Barker, L.:
A Comparison of Nine Confidence Intervals for a Poisson Parameter When the Expected Number of Events is  ≤ 5, Am. Stat., 56, 85–89, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1198/000313002317572736" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1198/000313002317572736</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Bi, K., Ma, X., Chen, Y., Fu, S., and Xue, H.:
The Observation of Ice-Nucleating Particles Active at Temperatures above–15&thinsp;°C and Its Implication on Ice Formation in Clouds, J. Meteorol. Res.-PRC, 32, 734–743, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7181-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7181-z</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Cabrera-Segoviano, D., Pereira, D. L., Rodriguez, C., Raga, G. B., Miranda, J., Alvarez-Ospina, H., and Ladino, L. A.:
Inter-annual variability of ice nucleating particles in Mexico city, Atmos. Environ., 273, 118964, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.118964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.118964</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, J., Wu, Z., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Grawe, S., Hartmann, M., Pei, X., Liu, Z., Ji, D., and Wex, H.:
Ice-nucleating particle concentrations unaffected by urban air pollution in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3523–3539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3523-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3523-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, J., Wu, Z., Chen, J., Reicher, N., Fang, X., Rudich, Y., and Hu, M.:
Size-resolved atmospheric ice-nucleating particles during East Asian dust events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3491–3506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3491-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3491-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, J., Wu, Z., Meng, X., Zhang, C., Chen, J., Qiu, Y., Chen, L., Fang, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Gao, J., Li, W., and Hu, M.:
Observational Evidence for the Non-Suppression Effect of Atmospheric Chemical Modification on the Ice Nucleation Activity of East Asian Dust, Sci. Total Environ., 861, 160708, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160708" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160708</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, J., Wu, Z., Gong, X., Qiu, Y., Chen, S., Zeng, L., and Hu, M.:
Anthropogenic Dust as a Significant Source of Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Urban Environment, Earths Future, 12, e2023EF003738, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003738" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003738</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Connolly, P. J., Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Saathoff, H., Burgess, R., Choularton, T., and Gallagher, M.:
Studies of heterogeneous freezing by three different desert dust samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2805–2824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009</a>, 2009. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       David, R. O., Marcolli, C., Fahrni, J., Qiu, Y., Perez Sirkin, Y. A., Molinero, V., Mahrt, F., Brühwiler, D., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.:
Pore condensation and freezing is responsible for ice formation below water saturation for porous particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 8184–8189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813647116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813647116</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       De Leo, V., Catucci, L., Di Mauro, A. E., Agostiano, A., Giotta, L., Trotta, M., and Milano, F.:
Effect of ultrasound on the function and structure of a membrane protein: The case study of photosynthetic Reaction Center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Ultrason. Sonochem., 35, 103–111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.09.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.09.007</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D., Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.:
Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, R. C., Petters, M. D., Tobo, Y., Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Snider, J. R., Wang, Z., and Kreidenweis, S. M.:
Integrating laboratory and field data to quantify the immersion freezing ice nucleation activity of mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 393–409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015</a>, 2015. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Engelstaedter, S., Tegen, I., and Washington, R.:
North African dust emissions and transport, Earth-Sci. Rev., 79, 73–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.06.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.06.004</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       Harrison, A. D., Lever, K., Sanchez-Marroquin, A., Holden, M. A., Whale, T. F., Tarn, M. D., McQuaid, J. B., and Murray, B. J.:
The ice-nucleating ability of quartz immersed in water and its atmospheric importance compared to K-feldspar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11343–11361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11343-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11343-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.:
Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</a>, 2012. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Hu, Y., Tian, P., Huang, M., Bi, K., Schneider, J., Umo, N. S., Ullmerich, N., Höhler, K., Jing, X., Xue, H., Ding, D., Liu, Y., Leisner, T., and Möhler, O.:
Characteristics of ice-nucleating particles in Beijing during spring: A comparison study of measurements between the suburban and a nearby mountain area, Atmos. Environ., 293, 119451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119451</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Huang, Y., Adebiyi, A. A., Formenti, P., and Kok, J. F.:
Linking the Different Diameter Types of Aspherical Desert Dust Indicates That Models Underestimate Coarse Dust Emission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092054</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Ed.):
Clouds and Aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 571–658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Jahn, L. G., Polen, M. J., Jahl, L. G., Brubaker, T. A., Somers, J., and Sullivan, R. C.:
Biomass combustion produces ice-active minerals in biomass-burning aerosol and bottom ash, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 21928–21937, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922128117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922128117</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Jung, S., Tiwari, M. K., and Poulikakos, D.:
Frost halos from supercooled water droplets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 16073–16078, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206121109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206121109</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D. J., and Krämer, M.:
Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteor. Mon., 58, 1.1–1.33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Kanji, Z. A., Welti, A., Corbin, J. C., and Mensah, A. A.:
Black Carbon Particles Do Not Matter for Immersion Mode Ice Nucleation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086764, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086764" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086764</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Karagulian, F., Belis, C. A., Dora, C. F. C., Prüss-Ustün, A. M., Bonjour, S., Adair-Rohani, H., and Amann, M.:
Contributions to cities' ambient particulate matter (PM): A systematic review of local source contributions at global level, Atmos. Environ., 120, 475–483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.087" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.087</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Ladino, L. A., Raga, G. B., Alvarez-Ospina, H., Andino-Enríquez, M. A., Rosas, I., Martínez, L., Salinas, E., Miranda, J., Ramírez-Díaz, Z., Figueroa, B., Chou, C., Bertram, A. K., Quintana, E. T., Maldonado, L. A., García-Reynoso, A., Si, M., and Irish, V. E.:
Ice-nucleating particles in a coastal tropical site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6147–6165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6147-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6147-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, F., Yan, J., Wei, Y., Zeng, J., Wang, X., Chen, X., Zhang, C., Li, W., Chen, M., and Lü, G.:
PM<sub>2.5</sub>-bound heavy metals from the major cities in China: Spatiotemporal distribution, fuzzy exposure assessment and health risk management, J. Clean. Prod., 286, 124967, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124967" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124967</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.:
Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</a>, 2005. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Lohmann, U., Lüönd, F., and Mahrt, F.:
An Introduction to Clouds: From the Microscale to Climate, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087513" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087513</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Marcolli, C.:
Deposition nucleation viewed as homogeneous or immersion freezing in pores and cavities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2071–2104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014</a>, 2014. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Marguí, E., Queralt, I., and de Almeida, E.:
X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for environmental analysis: Basic principles, instrumentation, applications and recent trends, Chemosphere, 303, 135006, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135006</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       McCluskey, C. S., DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Levin, E. J. T., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, A. P., Hill, T. C. J., Nakao, S., Carrico, C. M., and Kreidenweis, S. M.:
Characteristics of atmospheric ice nucleating particles associated with biomass burning in the US: Prescribed burns and wildfires, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 10458–10470, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021980" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021980</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Murray, B. J., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J. D., and Webb, M. E.:
Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6519–6554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35200A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35200A</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Niedermeier, D., Hartmann, S., Clauss, T., Wex, H., Kiselev, A., Sullivan, R. C., DeMott, P. J., Petters, M. D., Reitz, P., Schneider, J., Mikhailov, E., Sierau, B., Stetzer, O., Reimann, B., Bundke, U., Shaw, R. A., Buchholz, A., Mentel, T. F., and Stratmann, F.:
Experimental study of the role of physicochemical surface processing on the IN ability of mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11131–11144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11131-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11131-2011</a>, 2011. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P., Klein, H., Bingemer, H., DeMott, P., Skrotzki, J., and Leisner, T.:
A Particle-Surface-Area-Based Parameterization of Immersion Freezing on Desert Dust Particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Ross, J. F., and Webb, M. E.:
The adsorption of fungal ice-nucleating proteins on mineral dusts: a terrestrial reservoir of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7879–7887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7879-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7879-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       O'Sullivan, D., Adams, M. P., Tarn, M. D., Harrison, A. D., Vergara-Temprado, J., Porter, G. C. E., Holden, M. A., Sanchez-Marroquin, A., Carotenuto, F., Whale, T. F., McQuaid, J. B., Walshaw, R., Hedges, D. H. P., Burke, I. T., Cui, Z., and Murray, B. J.:
Contributions of biogenic material to the atmospheric ice-nucleating particle population in North Western Europe, Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 13821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31981-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31981-7</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Peters, T. M., Ott, D., and O'Shaughnessy, P. T.:
Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 Portable Aerosol Spectrometer to the TSI 3321 Aerodynamic Particle Sizer for Dry Particles, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 50, 843–850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mel067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mel067</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Petters, M. D. and Wright, T. P.:
Revisiting ice nucleation from precipitation samples, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8758–8766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065733" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065733</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Polen, M., Lawlis, E., and Sullivan, R. C.:
The unstable ice nucleation properties of Snomax<span style="position:relative; bottom:0.5em; " class="text">®</span> bacterial particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 11666–11678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025251" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025251</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Price, H. C., Baustian, K. J., McQuaid, J. B., Blyth, A., Bower, K. N., Choularton, T., Cotton, R. J., Cui, Z., Field, P. R., Gallagher, M., Hawker, R., Merrington, A., Miltenberger, A., Neely III, R. R., Parker, S. T., Rosenberg, P. D., Taylor, J. W., Trembath, J., Vergara-Temprado, J., Whale, T. F., Wilson, T. W., Young, G., and Murray, B. J.:
Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Dusty Tropical Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2175–2193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027560" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027560</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       Pummer, B. G., Budke, C., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Niedermeier, D., Felgitsch, L., Kampf, C. J., Huber, R. G., Liedl, K. R., Loerting, T., Moschen, T., Schauperl, M., Tollinger, M., Morris, C. E., Wex, H., Grothe, H., Pöschl, U., Koop, T., and Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.:
Ice nucleation by water-soluble macromolecules, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4077–4091, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015</a>, 2015. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Reicher, N., Budke, C., Eickhoff, L., Raveh-Rubin, S., Kaplan-Ashiri, I., Koop, T., and Rudich, Y.:
Size-dependent ice nucleation by airborne particles during dust events in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11143–11158, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11143-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11143-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Rumsey, I. C. and Walker, J. T.:
Application of an online ion-chromatography-based instrument for gradient flux measurements of speciated nitrogen and sulfur, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2581–2592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2581-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2581-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Rumsey, I. C., Cowen, K. A., Walker, J. T., Kelly, T. J., Hanft, E. A., Mishoe, K., Rogers, C., Proost, R., Beachley, G. M., Lear, G., Frelink, T., and Otjes, R. P.:
An assessment of the performance of the Monitor for AeRosols and GAses in ambient air (MARGA): a semi-continuous method for soluble compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5639–5658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5639-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5639-2014</a>, 2014. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
       Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.:
NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Su, H., Yin, Y., Lu, C., Jiang, H., and Yang, L.:
Development of new diffusion cloud chamber type and its observation study of ice nuclei in the Huangshan area, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 38, 386–398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2013.12211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2013.12211</a>, 2014 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Tobo, Y., Uetake, J., Matsui, H., Moteki, N., Uji, Y., Iwamoto, Y., Miura, K., and Misumi, R.:
Seasonal Trends of Atmospheric Ice Nucleating Particles Over Tokyo, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD033658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033658" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033658</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
       Toll, V., Rahu, J., Keernik, H., Trofimov, H., Voormansik, T., Manshausen, P., Hung, E., Michelson, D., Christensen, M. W., Post, P., Junninen, H., Murray, B. J., Lohmann, U., Watson-Parris, D., Stier, P., Donaldson, N., Storelvmo, T., Kulmala, M., and Bellouin, N.:
Glaciation of liquid clouds, snowfall, and reduced cloud cover at industrial aerosol hot spots, Science, 386, 756–762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl0303" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl0303</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       US EPA:
EPA Positive Matrix Factorization 5.0 Fundamentals and User Guide, <a href="https://www.epa.gov/air-research/epa-positive-matrix-factorization-50-fundamentals-and-user-guide" target="_blank">https://www.epa.gov/air-research/epa-positive-matrix-factorization-50-fundamentals-and-user-guide</a> (last access: 10 October 2025), 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.:
Technical Note: A proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10263–10270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015</a>, 2015. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Wagh, S., Singh, P., Ghude, S. D., Safai, P., Prabhakaran, T., and Kumar, P. P.:
Study of ice nucleating particles in fog-haze weather at New Delhi, India: A case of polluted environment, Atmos. Res., 259, 105693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105693" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105693</a>, 2021.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Wan, Z., Song, K., Zhu, W., Yu, Y., Wang, H., Shen, R., Tan, R., Lv, D., Gong, Y., Yu, X., Chen, S., Zeng, L., Lou, S., Yu, Y., and Guo, S.:
A Closure Study of Secondary Organic Aerosol Estimation at an Urban Site of Yangtze River Delta, China, Atmosphere-Basel, 13, 1679, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101679" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101679</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, Y. Q.:
MeteoInfo: GIS software for meteorological data visualization and analysis, Meteorol. Appl., 21, 360–368, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1345" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1345</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Westbrook, C. D. and Illingworth, A. J.:
The formation of ice in a long-lived supercooled layer cloud, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 2209–2221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2096" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2096</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Wiedensohler, A.:
An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range, J. Aerosol Sci., 19, 387–389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(88)90278-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(88)90278-9</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Yahya, R. Z., Arrieta, J. M., Cusack, M., and Duarte, C. M.:
Airborne Prokaryote and Virus Abundance Over the Red Sea, Front. Microbiol., 10, 1112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01112</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Yang, J., Chen, J., Chen, J., Feng, Z., Fang, W., Qiu, Y., Wang, J., Man, R., Zong, T., Liu, Y., Wu, Z., Tang, N., and Hu, M.:
Dataset for atmospheric ice-nucleating particles in urban Taiyuan during winter 2023–2024, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20232172" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20232172</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, C., Wu, Z., Chen, J., Chen, J., Tang, L., Zhu, W., Pei, X., Chen, S., Tian, P., Guo, S., Zeng, L., Hu, M., and Kanji, Z. A.:
Ice-nucleating particles from multiple aerosol sources in the urban environment of Beijing under mixed-phase cloud conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7539–7556, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7539-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7539-2022</a>, 2022. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Zolles, T., Burkart, J., Häusler, T., Pummer, B., Hitzenberger, R., and Grothe, H.:
Identification of Ice Nucleation Active Sites on Feldspar Dust Particles, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 2692–2700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509839x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509839x</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
