<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-11733-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Chromophores and chemical compositions of brown carbon aerosol before and after photooxidation of combustion emissions</article-title><alt-title>Chromophores and chemical compositions of brown carbon aerosol</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Feng</given-names></name>
          <email>jiangfeng@aust.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6952-2785</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Bell</surname><given-names>David M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-2138</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff6">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Kun</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2970-037X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Borduas-Dedekind</surname><given-names>Nadine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-368X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Prevot</surname><given-names>Andre S. H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>Hongbiao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Saathoff</surname><given-names>Harald</given-names></name>
          <email>harald.saathoff@kit.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1301-8010</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Leisner</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Earth and Environment, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, 232001, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344 Eggenstein–Leopoldshafen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen 5232, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, United States</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Environmental Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Feng Jiang (jiangfeng@aust.edu.cn) and Harald Saathoff (harald.saathoff@kit.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>11733</fpage><lpage>11746</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Feng Jiang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11733/2026/acp-26-11733-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11733/2026/acp-26-11733-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11733/2026/acp-26-11733-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11733/2026/acp-26-11733-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e195">Brown carbon (BrC) aerosols affect earth's climate and originate mainly from biomass burning. However, chromophores and chemical composition of BrC remain difficult predict, especially considering BrC from different sources and aging e.g. by photooxidation. To address this gap, we studied emissions of burning beech wood, straw, plastics, and cow dung in an oxidative flow reactor allowing to conduct photooxidation aging of fresh emissions by using mass spectrometry and excitation emission spectroscopy with a parallel factor analysis. After photooxidation, volatile organic compounds and heavier molecules were oxidized and formed more oxidized products. Phenolic-like substances (PLS) and less oxygenated humic-like substances (LO-HULIS) dominated the fluorescence of primary organic aerosol with 88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 %. After photooxidation, the PLS chromophore significantly decreased from 45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 % to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 % and humic-like substance increased from 55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 % to 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 %, especially highly-oxygenated humic-like substance (HO-HULIS). The HULIS chromophores were unsaturated and contained high fractions with 5 %–10 % of nitrogen containing molecules. In contrast, the PLS chromophores had low oxidation states and contained lower fraction (2 %) of nitrogen containing molecules. After photooxidation, oxidation of PLS chromophores and volatile organic compounds in presence of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> were converted into HULIS with the higher fraction of nitrogen containing and unsaturation chromophores. This study extends the current understanding of formation and photochemcial aging of brown carbon chromophorese e.g. PLS, HO-HULIS, and LO-HULIS from open fires including their molecular composition. This will facilitate modelling of brown carbon aerosol e.g. in trasport models.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Anhui University of Science and Technology</funding-source>
<award-id>2026yjc007</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e252">Organic aerosols have a profound impact on air quality, human health, and climate. Typically, organic aerosol (OA) is considered to be non-light-absorbing, hence only contributing to scattering of solar radiation that leads to atmospheric cooling (Shrivastava et al., 2017). However, some OA compounds, known as Brown Carbon (BrC), can absorb solar radiation in the near-ultraviolet and visible spectral range contributing to atmospheric warming (Moise et al., 2015; Laskin et al., 2015). Global simulations using a chemical transport model (2° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5° horizontal resolution and 26 vertical layers) showed that brown carbon (BrC) absorption at ultraviolet-visible wavelengths contributes 7 %–19 % of total atmospheric aerosol absorption (Feng et al., 2013). The global measurement showed that the BrC accounted for 7 %–48 % of direct radiative forcing by comparing all absorbing carbonaceous aerosol (Zeng et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d2e262">The sources of BrC consisted of secondary formation and primary emissions. The secondary formation of BrC was mainly from oxidation of biogenic and anthropogenic volatile organic compounds, especially in the presence of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (Jiang et al., 2024; Xie et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2022). The global total primary BrC emissions from natural and anthropogenic sources in 2010 were estimated to 7.26 Tg (Xiong et al., 2022). On a global scale, biomass burning is considered as one of the most important sources for BrC (Laskin et al., 2015; Saleh, 2020). Field-based measurements have shown that a majority of BrC aerosol mass was associated with biomass burning dominating BrC absorption in different areas, e.g, more than 90 % in rural southeastern United States (Washenfelder et al., 2015), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % in Arctic region (Yue et al., 2022), 29 %–35 % in Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau (Zhu et al., 2024), 50 %–80 % in Israel (Lin et al., 2017), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % in central Europe (Moschos et al., 2018). In addition, burning experiments showed that the nitro-aromatics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon derivatives, and polyphenols were important chromophores (molecules capable of absorbing light at specific wavelengths, causing electronic transitions and giving the molecule its characteristic color) for brown carbon from wood burning emissions (Lin et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2021). In India, more than half of households use inefficient stoves for cooking, burning solid fuels such as cow dung, firewood, crop residues, and charcoal (Census of India, 2011). This contributes to poor household air quality, chronic and acute respiratory diseases, and even premature death (Smith et al., 2014). The burning of plastic has been estimated to contribute 13.4 % of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in India, and 6.8 % in China (Haque et al., 2019). Previous studies have shown that the BrC chromophores and compositions were different from different biofuels and burning conditions (Huang et al., 2021; Song et al., 2022). Therefore, it is essential to investigate the chromophores and compositions of aerosol particles emitted from burning different fuels.</p>
      <p id="d2e297">BrC aging refers to the chemical and photochemical transformation of light-absorbing organic aerosols, a process that is critical because it governs their optical properties, reactivity, and overall atmospheric fates (Laskin et al., 2025). Many studies have investigated aging process of BrC from combustion emissions. For example, Li et al. (2020) found that OH radical oxidation and direct photolysis diminished light absorption of wood tar aerosol, since they can decompose the absorption species like nitro-aromatic compounds. The photolysis can fragment chromophore into smaller and less absorbing molecules (Fleming et al., 2020). Sumlin et al. (2017) found that photooxidation decreased the BrC absorption with 46 %, since the fragmentation reactions reduce the size of conjugated molecular system of BrC. Primary BrC from biomass burning with O<sub>3</sub> aging led to decompose protein-like chromophores and form humic-like chromophores (Fan et al., 2020). Sumlin et al. (2017) found that OH radical oxidation can initially enhance brown carbon absorption, followed by bleaching upon further oxidation. Even though the photooxidation and photolysis decreased the light absorption of BrC and decomposed chromophores, it is still uncertain about which chromophores degrade and ultimately the process responsible for the observed changes.</p>
      <p id="d2e309">Excitation emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy has been widely used to investigate the chromophore and light absorption of BrC in atmosphere. Combining mass spectrometer and EEM spectroscopy, the chromophore of BrC can be classified into highly oxygenated humic like substances (HO-HULIS), less-oxygenated humic like substances (LO-HULIS), protein compounds (Chen et al., 2016, 2020), and phenol like chromophore (PLS) (Jiang et al., 2022; Tang et al., 2024). In the field measurement, a LO-HULIS chromophore dominated the fluorescence intensity of BrC in winter and, in contrast, HO-HULIS chromophore in summer (Jiang et al., 2022; Deng et al., 2022). The PLS chromophore accounted for 37 %–51 % of total fluorescence of primary BrC from wood burning emission (Fan et al., 2020). Therefore, fluorescence studies are useful to identify the chromophore type of BrC. However, chemical compositions of BrC chromophores are still not well known, especially for particles from biomass burning.</p>
      <p id="d2e313">The filter inlet for gases and aerosols coupled to a high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer (FIGAERO–HR-ToF-CIMS) can provide new insights into the molecular compositions of organic aerosol (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014). For example, Kong et al. (2021) found that the chemical compositions of primary particles were composed of lignin pyrolysis products, cellulose and hemicellulose pyrolysis products, and  nitrogen-containing compounds in a residential wood burning boiler experiment. Several studies have also used CIMS to identify nitro aromatic compounds, typical brown carbon (Cai et al., 2022; Mohr et al., 2013; Salvador et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2025). In addition, Jiang et al. (2022) used the CIMS to identify 316 potential BrC molecules and 5 nitro aromatic compounds in field measurements. Therefore, the CIMS is a useful instrument to detect the chemical composition of organic aerosol and BrC. Combining FIGAERO-CIMS and excitation emission spectroscopy, it is helpful to link chromophores and the chemical composition of primary BrC from burning combustion emission.</p>
      <p id="d2e316">In this study, we investigated the influence of fuel type and photochemical aging on the optical and chemical properties of primary and secondary BrC. In this study, we investigated the influence of fuel type and photochemical aging on the optical and chemical properties of primary and secondary BrC. The fuels (wood beech, straw, cow dung, and plastic) were combusted to generate primary particles and gases by using an open stainless-steel cylinder and a holding tank. These emissions were oxidized within an oxidative flow reactor to simulate the photooxidative aging process. The primary and secondary emissions produced through these experiments were analyzed by excitation emission spectroscopy and FIGAERO-CIMS. This work allows for a better understanding of the changing of chromophore and chemical composition of BrC from primary burning emissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Experimental setup</title>
      <p id="d2e334">A total of 4 burning experiments were conducted using 4 different types of burning materials, including beech, straw, cow dung, and plastic, as shown in Table S1 in the Supplement. Please note that each burning experiment had no replicate experiment. This could lead to uncertainties in the results since the biomass burning experiments involve inherent variability. The burning materials are described in more detail by previous publications (Zhang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2025; Li et al., 2024). Briefly, the straw and beech were sourced from a local forestry company in Würenlingen, Switzerland. The cow dung cakes (made of cow dung and straw) were sourced from Goyla dairy, Delhi, India and polyethylene plastic materials were bought in Delhi, India. We categorized four burning types for this experiment: beech, cow dung, straw, and plastic. We selected these four solid fuels and conducted emissions tests to simulate certain types of burning in the atmosphere. The beech, straw, and cow dung are representative of residential combustion fuels, which is consistent with the materials used in previous articles (Zhang et al., 2023; Li et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2025). The polyethylene plastic materials are representative of plastic burning in India and China (Haque et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d2e337">The stainless-steel cylinder is 62 cm in diameter and 35 cm in height. This cylinder has been used to investigate wood beech burning emissions in the previous studies (Sardena et al., 2026; Bogler et al., 2025). The burning cow dung and plastic materials on top of stainless-steel cylinder were presented as waste burning in India (Zhang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2025). In addition, the cow dung and plastic burning on the top of stainless-steel cylinder was more efficiency than in the stainless-steel cylinder. The experimental setup is shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. The fuels were  ignited with kindling, and the emissions were pulled into a hood. After the kindling burned away (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 to 10 min after ignition), the emissions were introduced into a holding tank through stainless steel sampling lines and passing through an ejection dilutor (DI-1000, Dekati Ltd.) with a dilution ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10. The holding tank is a stainless-steel container (1 m<sup>3</sup>) used to store emissions. The aim of holding tank is to average the emissions at different combustion efficiency in order to fully characterize the emission in ambient (Zhang et al., 2023). The holding tank was flushed overnight with clean air before each experiment, ensuring the background particle concentrations were less than 10 particles cm<sup>−3</sup>. To avoid cross-contamination from residual SVOCs in the holding tank, it was flushed overnight with clean air before each experiment, ensuring the background particle concentrations were less than 10 particles cm<sup>−3</sup>. This way residual SVOCs did not significantly affect subsequent measurements (Li et al., 2024). The emissions were injected into the holding tank for 10 to 30 min, depending on the emission source (Zhang et al., 2023). When the particle mass concentration was between 1 to 5 mg m<sup>−3</sup>, we stopped injecting particles into the holding tank. The particles in the holding tank were collected by quartz filters and Teflon filters and samples can be considered as primary organic aerosol. Blank quartz and Teflon filters were collected during the campaign and analyzed in the same way as the other samples. Please note that quartz filters and Teflon filters have different adsorption behaviour of gases which could lead to different filter loading and hence differences between EEM and mass spectrometer analysis. The partitioning of the VOC into the aerosol particles loaded on the filters may have a larger impact than the adsorption on the filter surface and this effect is expected to be similar for both filter types. However, the sampling time for fresh particles was 5 min and the sampling flow for fresh and aged particles was 8 L min<sup>−1</sup>, which will help mitigate uptake of gases onto the filters. The overall adsorption of SVOC on the filter was small compared to the typical aerosol particle mass loading.</p>
      <p id="d2e412">The holding tank was connected to an oxidative flow reactor (OFR) to generate secondary organic aerosol from the volatile organic compounds and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> present in the holding tank. Please note that the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> was generated during the burning. There were no instruments to measure the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentration. However, according to previous studies, the concentrations of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> were around a few hundred ppm (Winter et al., 1999; Courtemanche and Levendis, 1998). Furthermore, the volatile organic compounds were generated from the combustion (Li et al., 2024). After the filter collection of the primary organic aerosol (POA), an aged OA filter was collected including both the POA and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) generated in the OFR. The OFR was maintained at 293 K and 50 % relative humidity, and a constant O<sub>3</sub> concentration of 4 ppm was present. The OFR has 254 nm lights, which photolyzes O<sub>3</sub> to produce OH radicals (Li et al., 2024). The OH exposure was set to 5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>11</sup> molec. cm<sup>−3</sup> s during the experiment (Li et al., 2024). The holding chamber provided a constant source of VOCs and POA to generate SOA (Li et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2025). The output of the OFR was directed to either a quartz or Teflon filter. Similar to previous studies (Li et al., 2024), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of POA entered the OFR and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SOA was formed in the OFR. Unfortunately, there was not a concurrent measurement of aerosol mass concentration during filter collection since the entire output of the OFR was directed to the filter samples. Therefore, it is not possible to discuss the results below in quantitative terms. Since the samples contain primary emissions and secondary aerosol, we named these filters as the aged organic aerosol e.g. Fig. 1. It is helpful to classify our samples. Before starting the experiments, the background filters were collected. The filter samples are shown in Table S1. For this paper, we will mainly discuss the results from excitation emission spectroscopy and FIGAERO-CIMS measurements.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e554">Mass spectra with iodide of particles from fresh OA and aged OA combustion emissions from FIGAERO-CIMS measurements. Particles from combustion/oxidation of beech wood; straw; plastics; cow dung. Please note that the signal intensity of C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>5</sub> was multiplied by 0.1. Please note that the samples contain both primary emissions and secondary aerosol after photooxidation, we named these samples as aged organic aerosol.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11733/2026/acp-26-11733-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>FIGAERO-CIMS analysis of filter samples</title>
      <p id="d2e598">Teflon filters collected at different phases of experiments were analyzed with a filter inlet for gases and aerosols coupled to a high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer (FIGAERO-HR-ToF-CIMS, Aerodyne Research Inc. hereafter CIMS) employing iodide (I<sup>−</sup>) for chemical ionization (Jiang et al., 2022; Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014) which provide information of individual organic compounds. In brief, particles on the Teflon filter were desorbed by a flow of ultra-high-purity nitrogen (99.9999 %) heated from room temperature to 200 °C over the course of 35 min (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2019). The resulting mass spectral signal evolutions as a function of desorption temperature are termed thermograms (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014). Integration of thermograms of individual compounds yielded their signal in counts per second, which were converted to mass concentrations assuming an average maximum sensitivity of 22 counts s<sup>−1</sup> ppt<sup>−1</sup> (cps ppt<sup>−1</sup>, ppt: parts per trillion) (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014). Please note that the sensitivity of CIMS for different organic compounds can vary by a few orders of magnitude.</p>
      <p id="d2e646">During the measurements, the mass resolution of FIGAERO-CIMS was relatively stable with about 4000 m/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The interference from isomers with different vapor pressures or thermal fragmentation of larger oligomeric molecules can lead to more complex, multimodal and broader thermograms (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014). The signal integration can include the different isomers or thermal fragmentation of larger oligomers. Therefore, the isomers or thermal decomposition can lead to increase errors of estimating the organic mass concentrations (Jiang et al., 2024). In this study, organic molecules of Teflon filters were identified by FIGAERO-CIMS. Please note that the iodide CIMS has sensitivities varying over several orders magnitude for different compounds, for example, different oxidation states (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2016). Keeping this in mind, it can still be meaningful to do a relative comparison of the large number of highly oxidized compounds assuming the same sensitivity. The raw data were analysed using the toolkit Tofware (v3.1.2, Tofwerk, Thun, Switzerland, and Aerodyne, Billerica) with Igor Pro software (v7.08, Wavemetrics, Portland, OR). Particle-phase backgrounds were assessed by putting an additional clean Teflon filter upstream of the particle phase sampling port during the deposition (Huang et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2018). In this study, we observed typically about 2800 mass peaks from particles corresponding to different oxygenated organic compounds using FIGAERO-CIMS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Excitation emission spectra of methanol-soluble compounds</title>
      <p id="d2e664">Methanol-soluble organic carbon (MSOC) was extracted from the quartz filters with 5 mL methanol (for analysis purity, Merck) via ultrasonication of filter punches for 30 min. The methanol extraction had high extraction efficiency for organic compounds on the filters. The methanol extraction efficiency for organic carbon was around 85 % (Cheng et al., 2016). Obtained extracts were filtered through a 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> polytetrafluoroethylene membrane into a glass bottle to remove the insoluble material. Please note that the MSOC contains methanol-soluble but also water-soluble compounds since also water-soluble compounds are partially soluble in methanol. We did this direct methanol extraction in order to dissolve a maximum number of compounds facilitating a good comparison with the mass spectrometric analysis in which there is no differentiation between different solubilities. However, this has to be kept in mind when comparing our results with studies that separated the water and methanol soluble fractions. Absorption and excitation–emission spectra of these extracts were measured by an Aqualog fluorometer (HORIBA Scientific, USA). Please note that since the organic mass loadings were not clear, we did not calculate the mass absorption coefficients. The Aqualog measurements were described by previous studies (Jiang et al., 2022). In the brief, we used an excitation wavelength range from 239–500 nm and an emission wavelength range from 247–700 nm. The wavelength increments of the scans for excitation and emissions were 3 and 2.33 nm, respectively. The excitation emission spectrum of each sample is shown in Fig. S4. The resulting excitation–emission spectra were analyzed with the PARAFAC model to identify potential chromophoric components in MSOC.</p>
      <p id="d2e677">The details of the data analysis procedure are given by Pucher et al. (2019) and Murphy et al. (2013). We used the StaRdom package for RStudio version 2026.04.0 of PARAFAC model (Pucher et al., 2019), which was downloaded from <uri>https://cran.r-project.org/web//packages/staRdom/vignettes/PARAFAC_analysis_of_EEM.html</uri> (last access: 19 February 2026). In brief, light absorption measurements were used to correct the excitation-emission matrices (EEM) for inner-filter effects. The highest absorbance was not greater than 2 (mostly below 0.5 at 237 nm), which is appropriate for inner-filter corrections of the EEMs. Afterwards, all EEMs were normalized to the Raman peak area of water so that their unit is in Raman units (RU) whose excitation wavelength was 350 nm. Additionally, an interpolation method was used to remove the signals of the first-order Rayleigh and Raman scattering as well as the second-order Rayleigh scattering in the EEMs. Using all 8 EEMs obtained for combustion emission particles in the PARAFAC analysis, three different components were adopted by comparisons of the residual errors and by visual inspection for the three- to seven component PARAFAC model (Fig. 2). They successfully passed the split-half validation with the split style of S4C6T3 for the 8 samples (Fig. S2). The corresponding model parameters and detailed information of the Split-half validation are shown in Table S2 and following contents.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e685">The three chromophores were identified by the PARAFAC model analysis of the excitation–emission spectra from all filter extracts collected from combustion of beech wood, straw, cow dung, and plastic.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11733/2026/acp-26-11733-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>


</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e704">The PARAFAC component intensities were normalized to the sum of components fluorescence intensities for given samples. The mass concentration of each molecule was normalized by the total mass concentration of 2871 organic molecules detected by FIGAERO-CIMS. The Spearman correlations were derived between each molecule and PARAFAC data across 8 samples (straw fresh OA, straw aged OA, plastic fresh OA, plastic aged OA, beech fresh OA, beech aged OA, cow dung fresh OA, and cow dung aged OA). The molecules correlated to PARAFAC component intensities with Spearman <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.643 (one tailed test, see the detailed information in Sect. S2) were assigned to each PARAFAC  component (Tables S5, S6, and S7) (Tang et al., 2024; Stubbins et al., 2014). The molecular formulas were categorized into four groups based on their Modified Aromaticity Index (AI<sub>mod</sub>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, e.g, condensed aromatic compounds (AI<sub>mod</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67); aromatic compounds (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AI<sub>mod</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67); highly unsaturated and phenolic compounds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5, AI<sub>mod</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5); and aliphatic compounds (1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Chemical composition of aerosol particles from combustion emissions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Chemical composition of fresh OAs from combustion emissions</title>
      <p id="d2e861">Fresh OA from combustion of beech wood, straw, plastics, and dried cow dung were collected on Teflon filters and analysed by FIGAERO-CIMS for the oxygenated organic compounds. Average mass spectra for particles formed for these four cases are presented in Fig. 1.</p>
      <p id="d2e864">The highest signal intensity was observed for C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>5</sub> accounting for 10 %–35 % of the total signal intensities from FIGAERO-CIMS (Table S3). This is consistent with previous studies in which levoglucosan was considered as a typical tracer for biomass burning (Bhattarai et al., 2019). In addition, levogluscon in POA from wood, straw, and cow dung contributed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % of the total intensity measured by the extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-ToF-MS) (Zhang et al., 2023). The plastic burning also had high C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>5</sub> signal with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34 % as detected by FIGAERO-CIMS. However, this could be a function of the FIGAERO-CIMS not being sensitive to non-oxygenated components emitted resulting in an amplified signal for species that are present. Additionally, this compound is not necessarily levoglucosan but could be isomers with the same sum formulas. In natural burning, the mass fraction of sugar derivatives (C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>12</sub>O<sub>6</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>12</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) was slightly higher (6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 %) than that in plastic burning (4.9 %). Therefore, natural burning could produce more sugar derivatives than plastic burning on average. However, these compounds are not a definitive tracer for distinguishing them due to uncertainties from combusiton emissions. C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>12</sub>O<sub>6</sub> and C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>4</sub> had also significant contributions of 1 %–6 % to the total signals of particles from combustion of beech wood, straw, cow dung, and plastic fresh OA. Zhang et al. (2023) found that C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>12</sub>O<sub>6</sub> was a dominant compounds with fractions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9  % in POA from wood, straw, and cow dung. Kong et al. (2021) also found that C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>12</sub>O<sub>6</sub> and C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>4</sub> of POA from combustion emission of birch, spruce and aspen had important signals in CIMS measurement. Interestingly, comparing the combustion products from the four fuels, compounds at higher mass ranges (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> including I<sup>−</sup>: 450–650) were formed mainly from straw, cow dung, and plastic. For fresh OA from straw-burning emission, C<sub>27</sub>H<sub>54</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>28</sub>H<sub>56</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>29</sub>H<sub>58</sub>NO<sub>2</sub>, and C<sub>32</sub>H<sub>64</sub>O<sub>2</sub> showed relatively high fractions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 %. For fresh OA from cow-dung burning emissions, C<sub>29</sub>H<sub>58</sub>NO<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>32</sub>H<sub>64</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and C<sub>32</sub>H<sub>66</sub>N<sub>3</sub>O showed high contributions with 1 %–2 %. For fresh OA from plastic burning emission, C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>32</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>18</sub>H<sub>32,34,36</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and C<sub>24</sub>H<sub>44,48</sub>O<sub>2</sub> showed high contributions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 %–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 %. Those compounds with large molecular mass are likely to be common saturated and unsaturated fatty acids (Simoneit, 2002). Nitro-aromatic compounds (C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>7</sub>NO<sub>4</sub>, C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>NO<sub>4</sub>, and C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>9</sub>NO<sub>4</sub>) had lower fractions (0.3 %–0.9 %) on the burning products from primary emissions. Zhang et al. (2022) found that the nitro aromatic compounds emission factors varied by more than 2 orders of magnitude and the concentrations ranged from 6.47 ng m<sup>−3</sup> in the burning of briquette coal in the traditional stove to 2560 ng m<sup>−3</sup> in the sesame straw burning. Therefore, the emission of nitro aromatic compounds emissions varied in large range depending on the type of burning occurring and the incorporation of nitrogen in the burning materials.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Chemcial composition of aged OA from photooxidation</title>
      <p id="d2e1638">Figure 1 shows the major aged OA molecules formed by subsequent oxidation of the primary emissions from the burning fuels. The mass fraction of heavier molecules was reduced and lighter more oxidized compounds like small organic acids increased (Table S4). After photooxidation, C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>5</sub> in plastic fuels showed a 66 % decrease, which was larger than that in straw, Cow dung and beech fuels. The mass fraction of lighter molecules increased because of the formation of photochemical oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) generating SOA (Li et al., 2024). Li et al. (2024) also found that oxidation of volatile organic compounds from biomass burning was a major source of secondary organic aerosols (SOAs). The aged OA by in large has smaller moleculer weights than those present in the fresh OA. As shown in Fig. S3, after photooxidation of the fresh OA, all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios increased between 0.1 and 0.4 with largest increases for straw and cow dung. The mass fraction of smaller organic acids (C2–C5) of aged OA in straw and cow dung were 24 % and 34 % higher than 12 % and 18 % in beech and plastic. The higher enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of aged OA in straw and cow dung is caused by the higher contributions of smaller organic acids. Kodros et al. (2022) also found that the oxidation of biomass burning aerosol leads to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios ranging from 0.09–0.23 (enhancement of 1.2–1.58) after the injection of NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> for 3 h. Yazdani et al. (2023) found that the biomass burning secondary OA became more oxidized with continued aging and the productions were dominated by acids. Kodros et al. (2020) found that the composition of the biomass burning OA evolves dramatically under oxidation and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from 1.2 to 1.5.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Chromophore identification and abundance in fresh OA</title>
      <p id="d2e1744">Filter samples collected for the eight different cases were dissolved by methanol and measured their absorption and excitation-emission spectra. A PARAFAC model was used to investigate the major chromophores in methanol-soluble organic carbon extracted from the biomass-burning aerosol particles (Chen et al., 2020). With this approach, three different characteristic chromophore components were identified and named C1, C2, and C3, hereafter (Fig. 2). The peaks of excitation/emission (Ex/Em) values for C1 were at 239, 300 nm for excitation and at 372 nm for emission. Correlation analysis of PARAFAC components and Aerosol Mass Spectrometer data resulted that a similar water-soluble chromophore component can be considered as less-oxygenated humic-like substances (Chen et al., 2016). The peak of excitation/emission (Ex/Em) values for C2 was at 245 nm for excitation and at 372 nm for emissions. The maximum emission wavelength of C2 ranges above 400 nm. Similar components as C2 were found in water-soluble organic carbon and considered highly oxygenated humic-like substances (Chen et al., 2016; Yan and Kim, 2017). The maximum emission wavelength of C3 was less than 350 nm. It was located at the phenolic-like region which contains phenol and naphthalene compounds (Jiang et al., 2022), since the peaks of shorter excitation wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 nm) and shorter emission wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>350 nm) were associated with aromatic proteins like tyrosine (Cory and McKnight, 2005). Jiang et al. (2022) found that phenol- and naphthalene-like components had a good correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7) with phenol, which most likely originates from biomass burning and fossil fuel combustion. Compared with the significant similarity of the characteristic spectra identified using the PARAFAC model with literature data, C1 was considered as a less-oxygenated HULIS (LO-HULIS), C2 as a highly oxygenated HULIS (HO-HULIS), C3 as a phenolic-like substance (PLS).</p>
      <p id="d2e1775">Figure 3 shows that there were different relative contributions of  chromophore components from burning the four different fuels. The LO-HULIS has a relatively high contribution of (45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %) in biomass-burning fresh OA. The LO-HULIS was also identified as chromophore in brown carbon from biomass burning (straw, pinewood, and corn straw) with a contribution of 15 %–25 % (Fan et al., 2020). Tang et al. (2020) found that a similar chromophore was enriched in biomass burning aerosol with a fraction of 21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.9 %. The relative contribution of LO-HULIS was with 56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 % higher for beech wood than for the other three fuels with all nearly 40 %. However, compared to LO-HULIS, the HO-HULIS in four different fuels shows only lower contributions to fluorescence with 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 %. This is in contrast to findings by Jiang et al. (2022) who found that the HO-HULIS components dominated (96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6) % in summer and had much less but still substantial contributions of (31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8) % in winter, both for urban aerosol. However, this finding somewhat agrees with the HO-HULIS fraction of about 10 % of brown carbon POA from pinewood burning (Fan et al., 2020). In contrast to LO-HULIS, the relative contribution of the PLS in four different fuels was higher with 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 % which has an important contribution to the chromophore. This is consistent with a previous study where a similar component dominated the fluorescence in biomass-burning aerosol with about 35 %–45 % (Fan et al., 2020).</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1830">Relative contribution of the three chromophore components identified by PARAFAC model analysis to total fluorescence. Comparison of relative contributions from fresh OA and aged OA from combustion of the four different fuels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11733/2026/acp-26-11733-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Chromophore variations after photooxidation</title>
      <p id="d2e1847">Variations of the relative chromophore contributions for the oxidized primary emissions of the four fuels are displayed in Fig. 3 as well. After aging with ozone and OH radicals during photooxidation, the relative contribution of PLS significantly decreased, from 54 % to 8 % for plastic, from 33 % to 5 % for straw, from 52 % to 9 % for beech wood, and from 43 % to 20 % for cow dung. These findings suggest that the phenolic-like chromophore is easily susceptible to photooxidation. The HO-HULIS exhibits a significant increase with photooxidation from 5 % to 46 % for plastic, from 23 % to 34 % for straw, from 12 % to 31 % for beech wood, and from 8 % to 19 % for cow dung. This indicates that excitation-emission associated with HO-HULIS increased substantially with the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and SOA is the dominant contributor to HO-HULIS. In comparison, the LO-HULIS also moderately increased, from 41 % to 47 % for plastic, from 44 % to 61 % for straw, from 36 % to 60 % for beech wood, and from 49 % to 61 % for cow dung. Taken together, the relative contributions of humic-like fluorophores (LO-HULIS and HO-HULIS) accounted for 77 %–91 % of the aged combustion BrC (aged OA), which is much higher than the range of 44 %–55 % observed for the primary samples (fresh OA). After photooxidation, the light absorption and Absorption  Ångström Exponent were also significantly deceased (Fig. S5). Consistently, after photooxidation, smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> organic molecules were formed from SOA formation (Fig. 1). The major difference after SOA formation is the shift in the emission spectra from lower wavelengths (333–370 nm) to higher wavlengths (462 nm).</p>
      <p id="d2e1862">Correspondingly, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio increased with an enhancement of 0.1–0.4 (Fig. S3). Compared with previous studies, the O<sub>3</sub> oxidation of oxyaromatics could produce polyhydroxylated aromatics (Fan et al., 2020). Fan et al. (2020) also found that a component (protein-like or phenol-like organic matter, PLOM) similar as PLS was predominantly decomposed by ozone aging, while the relative fraction of highly oxygenated humic-like components significantly increased. Though, ozonolysis of biomass burning POA generated from wood combustion is relatively minor on the time scale of oxdative flow reactor, where the O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C ratio increased by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % (Bogler et al., 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Molecular signatures of PARAFAC chromophores</title>
      <p id="d2e1908">The chemical composition of organic aerosol could be assigned to the three different chromophores factors (LO-HULIS, HO-HULIS, and PLS) identified by the PARAFAC analysis based on their individual correlations. The detailed correlation and assignments are shown in Sect. S2 and Table S5, S6, and S7 in the Supplement. The properties of molecules related to the three chromophore components are given in Table 1. As shown in Table S5, 49 molecules were associated with LO-HULIS chromophore and accounted for 6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2 % of total organic molecules detected by FIGAERO-CIMS. The number of LO-HULIS assocated molucules was lower than HO-HULIS and PLS. Compared with HO-HULIS and PLS, LO-HULIS molecules showed a relatively low molecular weight (156.6 Da), an low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 0.6, higher unsaturation degrees (DBE and AI<sub>mod</sub>), higher level of condensed aromatic compounds (23.4 %), and higher fractions of highly unsaturated and phenolic  compounds (36.0 %) (Fig. 4a, Table 1). This indicates that LO-HULIS  chromophores were highly unsaturated and have high fractions of highly  unsaturated and phenolic compounds. Consistently, Jiang et al. (2022) found that a similar chromophore group as HO-HULIS had a high DBE (5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04), a high AI<sub>mod</sub> (0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02), and a relatively low average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 in field measurements.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1984">Van Krevelen diagrams of FIGAERO-CIMS identified compounds assigned to PARAFAC components (LO-HULIS, HO-HULIS, and PLS).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11733/2026/acp-26-11733-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1996">The average properties of molecules were associated to three characteristic chromophores. The number of average molecular mass, averages molecular properties, and structural grouping of molecular formulas as determined by FIGAERO-CIMS in 8 samples. These were founded to correlate with each of the 3 fluorescence PARAFAC components identified (LO-HULIS, HO-HULIS, and PLS); and those which did not correlate with any the PARAFAC component (Not included).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Average properties</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LO-HULIS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HO-HULIS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PLS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Molecular mass (Da)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">156.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">171.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">206.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AI mod</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OSc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mass fraction of nitrogen containing molecules (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Condensed aromatic compounds (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aromatic compounds (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Highly unsaturated and phenolic compounds (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aliphatic compounds (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2228">The 143 molecules associated with HO-HULIS chromophore accounted for 5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.4 % of total organic molecular signals detected by FIGAERO-CIMS. The number of molucules assocated with HO-HULIS was higher than LO-HULIS and PLS. Compared with LO-HULIS and PLS, HO-HULIS molecules showed a middle level of molecular weight (171.9 Da), higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (0.8), higher OSc (0.3), higher fraction of nitrogen containning molecules, and lower fractions of highly unsaturated and phenolic compounds (21.3 %) (Fig. 4b, Table 1). Therefore, it indicates that the HO-HULIS chromophore was more oxidized and contained high fraction of nitrogen containing molecules. Compared with previous studies, a samilar chromphore as HO-HULIS shown that the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, molecular weight, DBE, and AI<sub>mod</sub> were 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01, 170 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 Da, 3.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03, and 0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01, respectively (Jiang et al., 2022). Tang et al. (2024) found that a similar chomophore as HO-HULIS had more than 60 % of nigrogen containing molecules. In addition, the HO-HULIS chromophore was associated with more compounds that possessed higher aromaticity (AI<sub>mod</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5) and higher oxidation state (OSC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) (Tang et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e2323">The 108 molecules associated with PLS chromophore accounted for 12.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6 % of total organic molecules detected by FIGAERO-CIMS. Compared with LO-HULIS and HO-HULIS, these molecules show a higher molecular mass (206.7 Da), lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (0.6), higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (1.5), lower unsaturation degrees (DBE and AI<sub>mod</sub>), lower OSc (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4), low fraction of nitrogen containing molecules (2 %), and higher fraction of aliphatic compounds (Fig. 4c, Table 1). In addition, the associated molecules of PLS chromophores had some monomers or dimmers, e.g., C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>14</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>18</sub>H<sub>32</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>18</sub>H<sub>34</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>18</sub>H<sub>35</sub>O<sub>2</sub>N<sub>3</sub>. Therefore, it indicates that the PLS  chromophore was low oxidation state, contained lower fraction of nitrogen containing molecules and higher fraction of aliphatic compounds. Compared with previous stuides, the PLS chromophore was not exclusively associated with nitrogen-contianing compounds (Tang et al., 2024; Stubbins et al., 2014). Tang et al. (2024) found that PLS chromophore in a field measurment was consisted of lowconjugation, nitrogen-depleted, and oxygen-depleted species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Potential mechanisms of PLS decreasing and HULIS formation during the photooxidation</title>
      <p id="d2e2502">After photooxidation, the relative contents of the PLS chromophore decreased. The photooxidation of PLS and volatile organic compounds in presence of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> could lead to form the HO-HULIS and LO-HULIS (Fig. 3). Please note that the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> was generated during the burning. According to previous studies, the concentrations of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> were around a few hundred ppm (Winter et al., 1999; Courtemanche and Levendis, 1998). The conceptual illustration is shown in Fig. 5. The PLS chromophore contained molecules with lower-conjugation, lower nitrogen content, and lower oxygen content. During the photooxidation, the PLS molecules were oxidized by O<sub>3</sub> and OH radicals in presence of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. The chemcial bonds in large molecules (C<sub>9.9</sub>H<sub>14.8</sub>N<sub>0.05</sub>O<sub>4.5</sub>) were broken. In addition, the photooxidation of VOCs in presence of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> can formed the small molecules with higher fractions of nitrogen-containing molecules and higher oxidation state (Li et al., 2024). Consequencely, they led to form LO-HULIS (C<sub>7.2</sub>H<sub>7.7</sub>N<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>3.8</sub>) and HO-HULIS (C<sub>7.3</sub>H<sub>8.6</sub>N<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>4.6</sub>) with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. Consistently, the O<sub>3</sub> oxidation of oxy-aromatics can cause the cleavage of the aromatic bond (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to generate polyfunctional low-molecular-weight carboxylic acids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and also formation of polyhydroxylated aromatics (phenol-OH) (Fan et al., 2020). However, evolutions of chromophore were different at ambinent environments compared with primary aerosol at oxidative flow reactor experiments. For example, the photochemical reaction and oxidation reaction drive degradation of less-oxygenated humic-like substances and led to forming highly-oxygenated humic-like substances (Chen et al., 2021a, b). This study has not yet achieved quantitative characterization of each individual process (the degradation of large molecules and oxidation of VOCs) contributing to HULIS chormophore formation. Future studies need to integrate isotopic techniques or mass spectromters to address this limitation and accurately quantify the contribution of each process.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2729">The PLS associated molecules and VOCs were oxidized into HO-HULIS associated molecules and LO-HULIS associated molecules during the photooxidation in the presence of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11733/2026/acp-26-11733-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e2756">The chemical composition and the corresponding optical properties of aerosol particles from combustion of straw, beech wood, plastic, and cow dung and their subsequent aging by photooxidation were comprehensively characterized using mass spectrometry (FIGAERO-CIMS) and excitation emission spectroscopy (Aqualog) as well as a series of supplementary instruments. C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>5</sub> dominated the oxygenated compounds with the total signal intensities of 10 %–35 % from FIGAERO-CIMS. After photooxidation, the heavier molecules were less abundant partially due to fragmentation but also due to gas to particle partitioning of lighter molecules formed by oxidation reactions in the gas phase e.g. C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>4</sub>O<sub>4</sub>. In addition, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio increased by 0.1–0.4. This indicates that aging of the primary combustion emissions in presence of photooxidation lead to higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and larger fractions of smaller organic acids.</p>
      <p id="d2e2865">The excitation–emission analysis of the methanol-soluble organic matter showed three distinct chromophores e.g., a less-oxygenated HULIS (LO-HULIS) component, a highly oxygenated HULIS (HO-HULIS) component, and a phenolic-like substance (PLS) component. Chromophores like PLS and LO-HULIS dominated the total fluorescence of primary organic aerosol with a relative fraction of 88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 %. After photooxidaiton, the PLS chromophore significantly decreased from 46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 % to 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 %. Assuming typical ambient OH concentrations  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>6</sup> molec. cm<sup>−3</sup>) and the laboratory photooxidation timescale (5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>11</sup> molec. cm<sup>−3</sup> s in experiment, equivalent to 4 d of atmospheric aging), the implied atmospheric lifetime of PLS is on the order of a few days. PLS can serve as a source-specific tracer only for very fresh combustion plumes. However, humic-like substances increased from 44 %–55 % observed for the primary samples to 77 %–91 % of the aged BrC, especially for the HO-HULIS chromophore. This points to photooxidation as a net formation pathway for HO-HULIS formation.</p>
      <p id="d2e2953">Links between PARAFAC components and molecuels detected by FIAERO-CIMS show that the HULIS chromophores are higher oxidation state and contained higher fractions of nitrogen containing molecules. In contrast, the PLS chromophore had a lower oxidation state and contained low fraction of nitrogen containing molecules. After photooxidation, the PLS chromophores fraction decreased. The oxidation of volatile organic compounds and degradation of large molecules generated smaller organic compounds with higher oxidation state and the high fractions of nitrogen containing molecules. However, this study has not yet achieved quantitative characterization of each individual process contributing to HULIS chormophore formation. Future studies need to integrate isotopic techniques or mass spectromters to address this limitation and accurately quantify the contribution of each process and specific fuels. Please note that this study lacks in replicating the individual burning experiments. Since individual burning experiments can vary substantially, we have reported relatively high uncertainties for our results. The study of Zhang et al. (2023), employing a very similar methodology, shows repeated burning experiments with a moderate variability for most fuels (beech, spruce, pine, straw, and plastic), but except for cow dung. Therefore, we consider the results given in this work as valid while the data for cow dung may vary substantially with burning conditions. It still needs more studies to investigate the aging process of combustion emission before and after photooxidation for a specific fuel type to ascertain the robust character and inherent variability of the chromophores and their markers. Though, we note that a strength of this study is the comparable common markers for each chromophore type despite the different fuel types. These mechanisms will help to understand evolution process of the chromophores from primary combustion emissions during the real atmospheric transportation and also provide information about not only the absorbance of light by the aerosols but also their emission spectra. Overall, this study provides insight into chromophore variations and chemical compositions of brown carbon aerosol from fresh burning combustion emissions and those after photooxidation using a FIGAERO-CIMS mass spectrometer and an excitation emission spectroscopy.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e2961">The data related to this article is accessible at KIT open data at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.35097/224dcybs1n7cphxm" ext-link-type="DOI">10.35097/224dcybs1n7cphxm</ext-link> (Feng et al., 2026). Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e2967">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11733-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11733-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e2976">JZ, FJ, RM, ND, KL, and DB conducted the burning experiments. JZ helped to collect the filters. FJ analysed the filters by FIGAERO-CIMS and Aqualog in the laboratory, did the CIMS and Aqualog data analysis, produced all figures, and wrote the paper. CH and TL gave general comments. HS gave general advice and comments for this paper. All authors provided suggestions for the data analysis, interpretation, and discussion, and contributed to the final text.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e2982">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e2991">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e2997">The authors gratefully thank the staff at PSI for providing substantial technical support during the burning experiment. We also would like to thank Pascal André Schneider from the Paul Scherrer Institute for building the holding tank and burning platform. Furthermore, Feng Jiang is thankful for the support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) and AUST Foundation.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e3002">Feng Jiang has received support from the Foundation of Anhui University of Science and Technology (award no. 2026yjc007).The article processing charges for this open-access  publication were covered by the Karlsruhe Institute  of Technology (KIT).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e3015">This paper was edited by Ryan Sullivan and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Bhattarai, H., Saikawa, E., Wan, X., Zhu, H. X., Ram, K., Gao, S. P., Kang, S. C., Zhang, Q. G., Zhang, Y. L., Wu, G. M., Wang, X. P., Kawamura, K., Fu, P. Q., and Cong, Z. Y.: Levoglucosan as a tracer of biomass burning: Recent progress and perspectives, Atmos. Res., 220, 20–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.01.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.01.004</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bogler, S., Zhang, J., Cheung, R. K. Y., Li, K., Prévôt, A. S. H., El Haddad, I., and Bell, D. M.: Ozonolysis of primary biomass burning organic aerosol particles: insights into reactivity and phase state, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 10229–10243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-10229-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-10229-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Cai, J., Wu, C., Wang, J., Du, W., Zheng, F., Hakala, S., Fan, X., Chu, B., Yao, L., Feng, Z., Liu, Y., Sun, Y., Zheng, J., Yan, C., Bianchi, F., Kulmala, M., Mohr, C., and Daellenbach, K. R.: Influence of organic aerosol molecular composition on particle absorptive properties in autumn Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1251–1269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1251-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-1251-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Census of India: Households by Availability of Separate Kitchen and Type of Fuel Used for Cooking, <uri>https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/census-tables</uri> (last access: 2 November 2023), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Hua, X., and Dyussenova, A.: Evolution of the chromophore aerosols and its driving factors in summertime Xi'an, Northwest China, Chemosphere, 281, 130838, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130838</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q. C., Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Coburn, S., Volkamer, R., Iwamoto, Y., Kagami, S., Deng, Y. G., Ogawa, S., Ramasamy, S., Kato, S., Ida, A., Kajii, Y., and Mochida, M.: Characterization of Chromophoric Water-Soluble Organic Matter in Urban, Forest, and Marine Aerosols by HR-ToF-AMS Analysis and Excitation–Emission Matrix Spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 10351–10360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01643</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q. C., Li, J. W., Hua, X. Y., Jiang, X. T., Mu, Z., Wang, M. M., Wang, J., Shan, M., Yang, X. D., Fan, X. J., Song, J. Z., Wang, Y. Q., Guan, D. J., and Du, L.: Identification of species and sources of atmospheric chromophores by fluorescence excitation-emission matrix with parallel factor analysis, Sci. Total Environ., 718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137322" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137322</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q. C., Hua, X. Y., Li, J. W., Chang, T., and Wang, Y. Q.: Diurnal evolutions and sources of water-soluble chromophoric aerosols over Xi'an during haze event, in Northwest China, Sci. Total Environ., 786, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147412" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147412</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K.-b., Du, Z.-y., Engling, G., Liu, J.-m., Ma, Y.-l., Zheng, M., and Weber, R. J.: The characteristics of brown carbon aerosol during winter in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 127, 355–364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cory, R. M. and McKnight, D. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy reveals ubiquitous presence of oxidized and reduced quinones in dissolved organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0506962</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Courtemanche, B. and Levendis, Y. A.: A laboratory study on the NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, CO and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the combustion of pulverized coal, municipal waste plastics and tires, Fuel, 77, 183–196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00191-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00191-9</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Deng, J., Ma, H., Wang, X., Zhong, S., Zhang, Z., Zhu, J., Fan, Y., Hu, W., Wu, L., Li, X., Ren, L., Pavuluri, C. M., Pan, X., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Kawamura, K., and Fu, P.: Measurement report: Optical properties and sources of water-soluble brown carbon in Tianjin, North China – insights from organic molecular compositions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6449–6470, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6449-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-6449-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Fan, X., Cao, T., Yu, X., Wang, Y., Xiao, X., Li, F., Xie, Y., Ji, W., Song, J., and Peng, P.: The evolutionary behavior of chromophoric brown carbon during ozone aging of fine particles from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4593–4605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4593-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4593-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Fleming, L. T., Lin, P., Roberts, J. M., Selimovic, V., Yokelson, R., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Molecular composition and photochemical lifetimes of brown carbon chromophores in biomass burning organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1105–1129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1105-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1105-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Haque, Md. M., Kawamura, K., Deshmukh, D. K., Fang, C., Song, W., Mengying, B., and Zhang, Y.-L.: Characterization of organic aerosols from a Chinese megacity during winter: predominance of fossil fuel combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5147–5164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5147-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-5147-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Huang, R. J., Yang, L., Shen, J. C., Yuan, W., Gong, Y. Q., Ni, H. Y., Duan, J., Yan, J., Huang, H. B., You, Q. H., and Li, Y. J.: Chromophoric Fingerprinting of Brown Carbon from Residential Biomass Burning, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 9, 102–111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00837" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00837</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Huang, W., Saathoff, H., Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Leisner, T., and Mohr, C.: Chemical Characterization of Highly Functionalized Organonitrates Contributing to Night-Time Organic Aerosol Mass Loadings and Particle Growth, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1165–1174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b05826</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, F., Song, J., Bauer, J., Gao, L., Vallon, M., Gebhardt, R., Leisner, T., Norra, S., and Saathoff, H.: Chromophores and chemical composition of brown carbon characterized at an urban kerbside by excitation–emission spectroscopy and mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14971–14986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14971-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-14971-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, F., Siemens, K., Linke, C., Li, Y., Gong, Y., Leisner, T., Laskin, A., and Saathoff, H.: Molecular analysis of secondary organic aerosol and brown carbon from the oxidation of indole, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2639–2649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2639-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-2639-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, F., Saathoff, H., Ezenobi, U., Song, J., Zhang, H., Gao, L., and Leisner, T.: Measurement report: Brown carbon aerosol in rural Germany – sources, chemistry, and diurnal variations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1917–1930, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1917-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-1917-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, F., Zhang, J., Bell, D. M., Li, K., Boduas-Dedekind, N., Prevot, A. S. H., Cui, H., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: Data for Chromophores and chemical compositions of brown carbon aerosol before and after photooxidation of combustion emissions,  Karlsruhe Institute of Technology [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.35097/224dcybs1n7cphxm" ext-link-type="DOI">10.35097/224dcybs1n7cphxm</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Kodros, J. K., Papanastasiou, D. K., Paglione, M., Masiol, M., Squizzato, S., Florou, K., Skyllakou, K., Kaltsonoudis, C., Nenes, A., and Pandis, S. N.: Rapid dark aging of biomass burning as an overlooked source of oxidized organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 33028–33033, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010365117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2010365117</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Kodros, J. K., Kaltsonoudis, C., Paglione, M., Florou, K., Jorga, S., Vasilakopoulou, C., Cirtog, M., Cazaunau, M., Picquet-Varrault, B., Nenes, A., and Pandis, S. N.: Secondary aerosol formation during the dark oxidation of residential biomass burning emissions, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2, 1221–1236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00031H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D2EA00031H</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Kong, X. R., Salvador, C. M., Carlsson, S., Pathak, R., Davidsson, K. O., Le Breton, M., Gaita, S. M., Mitra, K., Hallquist, A. M., Hallquist, M., and Pettersson, J. B. C.: Molecular characterization and optical properties of primary emissions from a residential wood burning boiler, Sci. Total Environ., 754, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142143" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142143</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., West, C. P., and Hettiyadura, A. P. S.: Molecular insights into the composition, sources, and aging of atmospheric brown carbon, Chem. Soc. Rev., 54, 1583–1612, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CS00609C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D3CS00609C</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., D'Ambro, E. L., Zhou, P., Boy, M., Petäjä, T., Hao, L., Virtanen, A., and Thornton, J. A.: Semi-volatile and highly oxygenated gaseous and particulate organic compounds observed above a boreal forest canopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11547–11562, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11547-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11547-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Li, C. L., He, Q. F., Fang, Z., Brown, S. S., Laskin, A., Cohen, S. R., and Rudich, Y.: Laboratory Insights into the Diel Cycle of Optical and Chemical Transformations of Biomass Burning Brown Carbon Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 11827–11837, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04310" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c04310</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Li, K., Zhang, J., Bell, D. M., Wang, T., Lamkaddam, H., Cui, T., Qi, L., Surdu, M., Wang, D., Du, L., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., and Prevot, A. S. H.: Uncovering the dominant contribution of intermediate volatility compounds in secondary organic aerosol formation from biomass-burning emissions, Natl. Sci. Rev., 11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nwae014</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11561–11570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Ehn, M., Rubach, F., Kleist, E., Wildt, J., Mentel, Th. F., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Worsnop, D., and Thornton, J. A.: A novel method for online analysis of gas and particle composition: description and evaluation of a Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 983–1001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-983-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Iyer, S., Mohr, C., Lee, B. H., D'Ambro, E. L., Kurtén, T., and Thornton, J. A.: Constraining the sensitivity of iodide adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry to multifunctional organic molecules using the collision limit and thermodynamic stability of iodide ion adducts, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1505–1512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1505-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1505-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zotter, P., Prevot, A. S. H., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Williams, L. R., Franklin, J. P., Zahniser, M. S., Worsnop, D. R., Knighton, W. B., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K. J., Dubey, M. K., Allan, J. D., and Thornton, J. A.: Contribution of Nitrated Phenols to Wood Burning Brown Carbon Light Absorption in Detling, United Kingdom during Winter Time, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6316–6324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400683v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400683v</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Moise, T., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: Optical Properties of Secondary Organic Aerosols and Their Changes by Chemical Processes, Chem. Rev., 115, 4400–4439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5005259</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Moschos, V., Kumar, N. K., Daellenbach, K. R., Baltensperger, U., Prevot, A. S. H., and El Haddad, I.: Source Apportionment of Brown Carbon Absorption by Coupling Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 5, 302–308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00118</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Graeber, D., and Bro, R.: Fluorescence spectroscopy and multi-way techniques. PARAFAC, Anal. Methods, 5, 6557–6566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41160e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c3ay41160e</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Pucher, M., Wunsch, U., Weigelhofer, G., Murphy, K., Hein, T., and Graeber, D.: staRdom: Versatile Software for Analyzing Spectroscopic Data of Dissolved Organic Matter in R, Water, 11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112366" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w11112366</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, R.: From Measurements to Models: Toward Accurate Representation of Brown Carbon in Climate Calculations, Curr. Pollut. Rep., 6, 90–104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Salvador, C. M. G., Tang, R., Priestley, M., Li, L., Tsiligiannis, E., Le Breton, M., Zhu, W., Zeng, L., Wang, H., Yu, Y., Hu, M., Guo, S., and Hallquist, M.: Ambient nitro-aromatic compounds – biomass burning versus secondary formation in rural China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1389–1406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1389-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1389-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Sardena, C., Gemmell, K. J., Zhang, J., Jiang, F., Saathoff, H., Bell, D. M., and Borduas-Dedekind, N.: Singlet Oxygen and Triplet Excited State Organics Produced by Primary Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol from Wood, Dung, Straw, and Plastic Fuels: Role of Solvent-Dependent Photochemistry, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 3, 611–626, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00462" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsestair.5c00462</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J. W., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B., Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T., Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J., Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R., Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016rg000540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016rg000540</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Simoneit, B. R. T.: Biomass burning — a review of organic tracers for smoke from incomplete combustion, Appl. Geochem., 17, 129–162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00061-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00061-0</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Smith, K. R., Bruce, N., Balakrishnan, K., Adair-Rohani, H., Balmes, J., Chafe, Z., Dherani, M., Hosgood, H. D., Mehta, S., Pope, D., and Rehfuess, E.: Millions Dead: How Do We Know and What Does It Mean? Methods Used in the Comparative Risk Assessment of Household Air Pollution, Annu. Rev. Publ. Heal., 35, 185–206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182356</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Song, J., Li, M., Zou, C., Cao, T., Fan, X., Jiang, B., Yu, Z., Jia, W., and Peng, P. A.: Molecular Characterization of Nitrogen-Containing Compounds in Humic-like Substances Emitted from Biomass Burning and Coal Combustion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 119–130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c04451</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Stubbins, A., Lapierre, J. F., Berggren, M., Prairie, Y. T., Dittmar, T., and del Giorgio, P. A.: What's in an EEM? Molecular Signatures Associated with Dissolved Organic Fluorescence in Boreal Canada, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 10598–10606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502086e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502086e</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Sumlin, B. J., Pandey, A., Walker, M. J., Pattison, R. S., Williams, B. J., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Atmospheric Photooxidation Diminishes Light Absorption by Primary Brown Carbon Aerosol from Biomass Burning, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 540–545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Tang, J., Li, J., Su, T., Han, Y., Mo, Y., Jiang, H., Cui, M., Jiang, B., Chen, Y., Tang, J., Song, J., Peng, P., and Zhang, G.: Molecular compositions and optical properties of dissolved brown carbon in biomass burning, coal combustion, and vehicle emission aerosols illuminated by excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2513–2532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Tang, J., Li, J., Zhao, S., Zhong, G., Mo, Y., Jiang, H., Jiang, B., Chen, Y., Tang, J., Tian, C., Zong, Z., Hussain Syed, J., Song, J., and Zhang, G.: Molecular signatures and formation mechanisms of water-soluble chromophores in particulate matter from Karachi in Pakistan, Sci. Total Environ., 914, 169890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169890" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169890</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Zhang, J., Lamkaddam, H., Li, K., Cheung, K. Y., Kattner, L., Gammelsæter, E., Bauer, M., Decker , Z. C. J., Bhattu, D., Huang, R., Modini, R. L., Slowik, J. G., El Haddad, I., Prevot, A. S. H., and Bell, D. M.: Chemical characterization of organic vapors from wood, straw, cow dung, and coal burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2707–2724, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2707-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-2707-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Brock, C. A., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber, R. J., Ng, N. L., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., Baumann, K., Cohen, R. C., Draper, D. C., Duffey, K. C., Edgerton, E., Fry, J. L., Hu, W. W., Jimenez, J. L., Palm, B. B., Romer, P., Stone, E. A., Wooldridge, P. J., and Brown, S. S.: Biomass burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653–664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062444</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Winter, F., Wartha, C., and Hofbauer, H.: NO and N2O formation during the combustion of wood, straw, malt waste and peat, Bioresource Technol., 70, 39–49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00019-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00019-X</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Chen, X., Hays, M. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J., Kleindienst, T. E., and Holder, A. L.: Light Absorption of Secondary Organic Aerosol: Composition and Contribution of Nitroaromatic Compounds, Environ. Sci.  Technol., 51, 11607–11616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03263" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b03263</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Xiong, R., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Jiang, K., Zheng, H., Kong, S., Shen, H., Cheng, H., Shen, G., and Tao, S.: Global brown carbon emissions from combustion sources, Environ. Sci. Ecotechnology, 12, 100201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ese.2022.100201</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Yan, G. and Kim, G.: Speciation and Sources of Brown Carbon in Precipitation at Seoul, Korea: Insights from Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectroscopy and Carbon Isotopic Analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11580–11587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02892</ext-link>, 2017. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Z., Tsona, N. T., George, C., and Du, L.: Nitrogen-Containing Compounds Enhance Light Absorption of Aromatic-Derived Brown Carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 4005–4016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08794" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c08794</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Yazdani, A., Takahama, S., Kodros, J. K., Paglione, M., Masiol, M., Squizzato, S., Florou, K., Kaltsonoudis, C., Jorga, S. D., Pandis, S. N., and Nenes, A.: Chemical evolution of primary and secondary biomass burning aerosols during daytime and nighttime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7461–7477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7461-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-7461-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Yue, S., Zhu, J., Chen, S., Xie, Q., Li, W., Li, L., Ren, H., Su, S., Li, P., Ma, H., Fan, Y., Cheng, B., Wu, L., Deng, J., Hu, W., Ren, L., Wei, L., Zhao, W., Tian, Y., Pan, X., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Wu, F., Liu, C.-Q., Su, H., Penner, J. E., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Cheng, Y., and Fu, P.: Brown carbon from biomass burning imposes strong circum-Arctic warming, One Earth, 5, 293–304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.006</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Zeng, L. H., Zhang, A. X., Wang, Y. H., Wagner, N. L., Katich, J. M., Schwarz, J. P., Schill, G. P., Brock, C., Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Williamson, C. J., Kupc, A., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., and Weber, R. J.: Global Measurements of Brown Carbon and Estimated Direct Radiative Effects, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020gl088747</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J., Li, K., Wang, T., Gammelsæter, E., Cheung, R. K. Y., Surdu, M., Bogler, S., Bhattu, D., Wang, D. S., Cui, T., Qi, L., Lamkaddam, H., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Prevot, A. S. H., and Bell, D. M.: Bulk and molecular-level composition of primary organic aerosol from wood, straw, cow dung, and plastic burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14561–14576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14561-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-14561-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Hu, B., Liu, X., Luo, Z., Xing, R., Li, Y., Xiong, R., Li, G., Cheng, H., Lu, Q., Shen, G., and Tao, S.: Variabilities in Primary N-Containing Aromatic Compound Emissions from Residential Solid Fuel Combustion and Implications for Source Tracers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 13622–13633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.2c03000</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, C.-S., Qu, Y., Huang, H., Shi, J.-L., Dai, W.-T., Zhang, N.-N., Wang, N., Wang, L.-Y., Ji, S.-S., and Cao, J.-J.: Brown Carbon From Biomass Burning Reinforces the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau Warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL107269</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Chromophores and chemical compositions of brown carbon aerosol before and after photooxidation of combustion emissions</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bhattarai, H., Saikawa, E., Wan, X., Zhu, H. X., Ram, K., Gao, S. P., Kang, S. C., Zhang, Q. G., Zhang, Y. L., Wu, G. M., Wang, X. P., Kawamura, K., Fu, P. Q., and Cong, Z. Y.: Levoglucosan as a tracer of biomass burning: Recent progress and perspectives, Atmos. Res., 220, 20–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.01.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.01.004</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bogler, S., Zhang, J., Cheung, R. K. Y., Li, K., Prévôt, A. S. H., El Haddad, I., and Bell, D. M.: Ozonolysis of primary biomass burning organic aerosol particles: insights into reactivity and phase state, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 10229–10243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-10229-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-10229-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, J., Wu, C., Wang, J., Du, W., Zheng, F., Hakala, S., Fan, X., Chu, B., Yao, L., Feng, Z., Liu, Y., Sun, Y., Zheng, J., Yan, C., Bianchi, F., Kulmala, M., Mohr, C., and Daellenbach, K. R.: Influence of organic aerosol molecular composition on particle absorptive properties in autumn Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1251–1269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1251-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1251-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Census of India: Households by Availability of Separate Kitchen and Type of Fuel Used for Cooking, <a href="https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/census-tables" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 November 2023), 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Q., Hua, X., and Dyussenova, A.: Evolution of the chromophore aerosols and its driving factors in summertime Xi'an, Northwest China, Chemosphere, 281, 130838, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130838</a>, 2021a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Q. C., Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Coburn, S., Volkamer, R., Iwamoto, Y., Kagami, S., Deng, Y. G., Ogawa, S., Ramasamy, S., Kato, S., Ida, A., Kajii, Y., and Mochida, M.: Characterization of Chromophoric Water-Soluble Organic Matter in Urban, Forest, and Marine Aerosols by HR-ToF-AMS Analysis and Excitation–Emission Matrix Spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 10351–10360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Q. C., Li, J. W., Hua, X. Y., Jiang, X. T., Mu, Z., Wang, M. M., Wang, J., Shan, M., Yang, X. D., Fan, X. J., Song, J. Z., Wang, Y. Q., Guan, D. J., and Du, L.: Identification of species and sources of atmospheric chromophores by fluorescence excitation-emission matrix with parallel factor analysis, Sci. Total Environ., 718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137322" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137322</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Q. C., Hua, X. Y., Li, J. W., Chang, T., and Wang, Y. Q.: Diurnal evolutions and sources of water-soluble chromophoric aerosols over Xi'an during haze event, in Northwest China, Sci. Total Environ., 786, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147412" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147412</a>, 2021b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Y., He, K.-b., Du, Z.-y., Engling, G., Liu, J.-m., Ma, Y.-l., Zheng, M., and Weber, R. J.: The characteristics of brown carbon aerosol during winter in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 127, 355–364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.035</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cory, R. M. and McKnight, D. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy reveals ubiquitous presence of oxidized and reduced quinones in dissolved organic matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Courtemanche, B. and Levendis, Y. A.: A laboratory study on the NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, CO and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the combustion of pulverized coal, municipal waste plastics and tires, Fuel, 77, 183–196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00191-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00191-9</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deng, J., Ma, H., Wang, X., Zhong, S., Zhang, Z., Zhu, J., Fan, Y., Hu, W., Wu, L., Li, X., Ren, L., Pavuluri, C. M., Pan, X., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Kawamura, K., and Fu, P.: Measurement report: Optical properties and sources of water-soluble brown carbon in Tianjin, North China – insights from organic molecular compositions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6449–6470, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6449-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6449-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fan, X., Cao, T., Yu, X., Wang, Y., Xiao, X., Li, F., Xie, Y., Ji, W., Song, J., and Peng, P.: The evolutionary behavior of chromophoric brown carbon during ozone aging of fine particles from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4593–4605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4593-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4593-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fleming, L. T., Lin, P., Roberts, J. M., Selimovic, V., Yokelson, R., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Molecular composition and photochemical lifetimes of brown carbon chromophores in biomass burning organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1105–1129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1105-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1105-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haque, Md. M., Kawamura, K., Deshmukh, D. K., Fang, C., Song, W., Mengying, B., and Zhang, Y.-L.: Characterization of organic aerosols from a Chinese megacity during winter: predominance of fossil fuel combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5147–5164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5147-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5147-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, R. J., Yang, L., Shen, J. C., Yuan, W., Gong, Y. Q., Ni, H. Y., Duan, J., Yan, J., Huang, H. B., You, Q. H., and Li, Y. J.: Chromophoric Fingerprinting of Brown Carbon from Residential Biomass Burning, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 9, 102–111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00837" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00837</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, W., Saathoff, H., Shen, X., Ramisetty, R., Leisner, T., and Mohr, C.: Chemical Characterization of Highly Functionalized Organonitrates Contributing to Night-Time Organic Aerosol Mass Loadings and Particle Growth, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1165–1174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05826" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05826</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiang, F., Song, J., Bauer, J., Gao, L., Vallon, M., Gebhardt, R., Leisner, T., Norra, S., and Saathoff, H.: Chromophores and chemical composition of brown carbon characterized at an urban kerbside by excitation–emission spectroscopy and mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14971–14986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14971-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14971-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiang, F., Siemens, K., Linke, C., Li, Y., Gong, Y., Leisner, T., Laskin, A., and Saathoff, H.: Molecular analysis of secondary organic aerosol and brown carbon from the oxidation of indole, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2639–2649, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2639-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2639-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiang, F., Saathoff, H., Ezenobi, U., Song, J., Zhang, H., Gao, L., and Leisner, T.: Measurement report: Brown carbon aerosol in rural Germany – sources, chemistry, and diurnal variations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1917–1930, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1917-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1917-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiang, F., Zhang, J., Bell, D. M., Li, K., Boduas-Dedekind, N., Prevot, A. S. H., Cui, H., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: Data for Chromophores and chemical compositions of brown carbon aerosol before and after photooxidation of combustion emissions,  Karlsruhe Institute of Technology [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.35097/224dcybs1n7cphxm" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.35097/224dcybs1n7cphxm</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kodros, J. K., Papanastasiou, D. K., Paglione, M., Masiol, M., Squizzato, S., Florou, K., Skyllakou, K., Kaltsonoudis, C., Nenes, A., and Pandis, S. N.: Rapid dark aging of biomass burning as an overlooked source of oxidized organic aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 33028–33033, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010365117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010365117</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kodros, J. K., Kaltsonoudis, C., Paglione, M., Florou, K., Jorga, S., Vasilakopoulou, C., Cirtog, M., Cazaunau, M., Picquet-Varrault, B., Nenes, A., and Pandis, S. N.: Secondary aerosol formation during the dark oxidation of residential biomass burning emissions, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2, 1221–1236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00031H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00031H</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kong, X. R., Salvador, C. M., Carlsson, S., Pathak, R., Davidsson, K. O., Le Breton, M., Gaita, S. M., Mitra, K., Hallquist, A. M., Hallquist, M., and Pettersson, J. B. C.: Molecular characterization and optical properties of primary emissions from a residential wood burning boiler, Sci. Total Environ., 754, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142143" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142143</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laskin, A., West, C. P., and Hettiyadura, A. P. S.: Molecular insights into the composition, sources, and aging of atmospheric brown carbon, Chem. Soc. Rev., 54, 1583–1612, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CS00609C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CS00609C</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., D'Ambro, E. L., Zhou, P., Boy, M., Petäjä, T., Hao, L., Virtanen, A., and Thornton, J. A.: Semi-volatile and highly oxygenated gaseous and particulate organic compounds observed above a boreal forest canopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11547–11562, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11547-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11547-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, C. L., He, Q. F., Fang, Z., Brown, S. S., Laskin, A., Cohen, S. R., and Rudich, Y.: Laboratory Insights into the Diel Cycle of Optical and Chemical Transformations of Biomass Burning Brown Carbon Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 11827–11837, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04310" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04310</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, K., Zhang, J., Bell, D. M., Wang, T., Lamkaddam, H., Cui, T., Qi, L., Surdu, M., Wang, D., Du, L., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., and Prevot, A. S. H.: Uncovering the dominant contribution of intermediate volatility compounds in secondary organic aerosol formation from biomass-burning emissions, Natl. Sci. Rev., 11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae014</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, P., Aiona, P. K., Li, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, J., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Laskin, A.: Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass Burning Aerosol Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11815–11824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03024</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11561–11570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Ehn, M., Rubach, F., Kleist, E., Wildt, J., Mentel, Th. F., Lutz, A., Hallquist, M., Worsnop, D., and Thornton, J. A.: A novel method for online analysis of gas and particle composition: description and evaluation of a Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 983–1001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-983-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Iyer, S., Mohr, C., Lee, B. H., D'Ambro, E. L., Kurtén, T., and Thornton, J. A.: Constraining the sensitivity of iodide adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry to multifunctional organic molecules using the collision limit and thermodynamic stability of iodide ion adducts, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1505–1512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1505-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1505-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mohr, C., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Zotter, P., Prevot, A. S. H., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Herndon, S. C., Williams, L. R., Franklin, J. P., Zahniser, M. S., Worsnop, D. R., Knighton, W. B., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K. J., Dubey, M. K., Allan, J. D., and Thornton, J. A.: Contribution of Nitrated Phenols to Wood Burning Brown Carbon Light Absorption in Detling, United Kingdom during Winter Time, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6316–6324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400683v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400683v</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moise, T., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: Optical Properties of Secondary Organic Aerosols and Their Changes by Chemical Processes, Chem. Rev., 115, 4400–4439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moschos, V., Kumar, N. K., Daellenbach, K. R., Baltensperger, U., Prevot, A. S. H., and El Haddad, I.: Source Apportionment of Brown Carbon Absorption by Coupling Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 5, 302–308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00118</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Graeber, D., and Bro, R.: Fluorescence spectroscopy and multi-way techniques. PARAFAC, Anal. Methods, 5, 6557–6566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41160e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41160e</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pucher, M., Wunsch, U., Weigelhofer, G., Murphy, K., Hein, T., and Graeber, D.: staRdom: Versatile Software for Analyzing Spectroscopic Data of Dissolved Organic Matter in R, Water, 11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112366" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112366</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saleh, R.: From Measurements to Models: Toward Accurate Representation of Brown Carbon in Climate Calculations, Curr. Pollut. Rep., 6, 90–104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Salvador, C. M. G., Tang, R., Priestley, M., Li, L., Tsiligiannis, E., Le Breton, M., Zhu, W., Zeng, L., Wang, H., Yu, Y., Hu, M., Guo, S., and Hallquist, M.: Ambient nitro-aromatic compounds – biomass burning versus secondary formation in rural China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1389–1406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1389-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1389-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sardena, C., Gemmell, K. J., Zhang, J., Jiang, F., Saathoff, H., Bell, D. M., and Borduas-Dedekind, N.: Singlet Oxygen and Triplet Excited State Organics Produced by Primary Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol from Wood, Dung, Straw, and Plastic Fuels: Role of Solvent-Dependent Photochemistry, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 3, 611–626, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00462" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00462</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J. W., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B., Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T., Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J., Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R., Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016rg000540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016rg000540</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simoneit, B. R. T.: Biomass burning — a review of organic tracers for smoke from incomplete combustion, Appl. Geochem., 17, 129–162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00061-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00061-0</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, K. R., Bruce, N., Balakrishnan, K., Adair-Rohani, H., Balmes, J., Chafe, Z., Dherani, M., Hosgood, H. D., Mehta, S., Pope, D., and Rehfuess, E.: Millions Dead: How Do We Know and What Does It Mean? Methods Used in the Comparative Risk Assessment of Household Air Pollution, Annu. Rev. Publ. Heal., 35, 185–206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182356</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, J., Li, M., Zou, C., Cao, T., Fan, X., Jiang, B., Yu, Z., Jia, W., and Peng, P. A.: Molecular Characterization of Nitrogen-Containing Compounds in Humic-like Substances Emitted from Biomass Burning and Coal Combustion, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 119–130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04451</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stubbins, A., Lapierre, J. F., Berggren, M., Prairie, Y. T., Dittmar, T., and del Giorgio, P. A.: What's in an EEM? Molecular Signatures Associated with Dissolved Organic Fluorescence in Boreal Canada, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 10598–10606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502086e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es502086e</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sumlin, B. J., Pandey, A., Walker, M. J., Pattison, R. S., Williams, B. J., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Atmospheric Photooxidation Diminishes Light Absorption by Primary Brown Carbon Aerosol from Biomass Burning, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 540–545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, J., Li, J., Su, T., Han, Y., Mo, Y., Jiang, H., Cui, M., Jiang, B., Chen, Y., Tang, J., Song, J., Peng, P., and Zhang, G.: Molecular compositions and optical properties of dissolved brown carbon in biomass burning, coal combustion, and vehicle emission aerosols illuminated by excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2513–2532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2513-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, J., Li, J., Zhao, S., Zhong, G., Mo, Y., Jiang, H., Jiang, B., Chen, Y., Tang, J., Tian, C., Zong, Z., Hussain Syed, J., Song, J., and Zhang, G.: Molecular signatures and formation mechanisms of water-soluble chromophores in particulate matter from Karachi in Pakistan, Sci. Total Environ., 914, 169890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169890" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169890</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, T., Zhang, J., Lamkaddam, H., Li, K., Cheung, K. Y., Kattner, L., Gammelsæter, E., Bauer, M., Decker , Z. C. J., Bhattu, D., Huang, R., Modini, R. L., Slowik, J. G., El Haddad, I., Prevot, A. S. H., and Bell, D. M.: Chemical characterization of organic vapors from wood, straw, cow dung, and coal burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2707–2724, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2707-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2707-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Brock, C. A., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber, R. J., Ng, N. L., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., Baumann, K., Cohen, R. C., Draper, D. C., Duffey, K. C., Edgerton, E., Fry, J. L., Hu, W. W., Jimenez, J. L., Palm, B. B., Romer, P., Stone, E. A., Wooldridge, P. J., and Brown, S. S.: Biomass burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653–664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Winter, F., Wartha, C., and Hofbauer, H.: NO and N2O formation during the combustion of wood, straw, malt waste and peat, Bioresource Technol., 70, 39–49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00019-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00019-X</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xie, M., Chen, X., Hays, M. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J., Kleindienst, T. E., and Holder, A. L.: Light Absorption of Secondary Organic Aerosol: Composition and Contribution of Nitroaromatic Compounds, Environ. Sci.  Technol., 51, 11607–11616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03263" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03263</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xiong, R., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Jiang, K., Zheng, H., Kong, S., Shen, H., Cheng, H., Shen, G., and Tao, S.: Global brown carbon emissions from combustion sources, Environ. Sci. Ecotechnology, 12, 100201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100201</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yan, G. and Kim, G.: Speciation and Sources of Brown Carbon in Precipitation at Seoul, Korea: Insights from Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectroscopy and Carbon Isotopic Analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11580–11587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02892</a>, 2017.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Z., Tsona, N. T., George, C., and Du, L.: Nitrogen-Containing Compounds Enhance Light Absorption of Aromatic-Derived Brown Carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 4005–4016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08794" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08794</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yazdani, A., Takahama, S., Kodros, J. K., Paglione, M., Masiol, M., Squizzato, S., Florou, K., Kaltsonoudis, C., Jorga, S. D., Pandis, S. N., and Nenes, A.: Chemical evolution of primary and secondary biomass burning aerosols during daytime and nighttime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7461–7477, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7461-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7461-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yue, S., Zhu, J., Chen, S., Xie, Q., Li, W., Li, L., Ren, H., Su, S., Li, P., Ma, H., Fan, Y., Cheng, B., Wu, L., Deng, J., Hu, W., Ren, L., Wei, L., Zhao, W., Tian, Y., Pan, X., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Wu, F., Liu, C.-Q., Su, H., Penner, J. E., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Cheng, Y., and Fu, P.: Brown carbon from biomass burning imposes strong circum-Arctic warming, One Earth, 5, 293–304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.006</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeng, L. H., Zhang, A. X., Wang, Y. H., Wagner, N. L., Katich, J. M., Schwarz, J. P., Schill, G. P., Brock, C., Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Williamson, C. J., Kupc, A., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., and Weber, R. J.: Global Measurements of Brown Carbon and Estimated Direct Radiative Effects, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088747</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, J., Li, K., Wang, T., Gammelsæter, E., Cheung, R. K. Y., Surdu, M., Bogler, S., Bhattu, D., Wang, D. S., Cui, T., Qi, L., Lamkaddam, H., El Haddad, I., Slowik, J. G., Prevot, A. S. H., and Bell, D. M.: Bulk and molecular-level composition of primary organic aerosol from wood, straw, cow dung, and plastic burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14561–14576, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14561-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14561-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, L., Hu, B., Liu, X., Luo, Z., Xing, R., Li, Y., Xiong, R., Li, G., Cheng, H., Lu, Q., Shen, G., and Tao, S.: Variabilities in Primary N-Containing Aromatic Compound Emissions from Residential Solid Fuel Combustion and Implications for Source Tracers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 13622–13633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03000" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03000</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhu, C.-S., Qu, Y., Huang, H., Shi, J.-L., Dai, W.-T., Zhang, N.-N., Wang, N., Wang, L.-Y., Ji, S.-S., and Cao, J.-J.: Brown Carbon From Biomass Burning Reinforces the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau Warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107269" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107269</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
