<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-11667-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Advancing isotope-enabled model for comprehensive understanding of atmospheric sulfur isotope effects: demonstrating the overlooked isotopic fractionation during combustion and flue gas desulfurization</article-title><alt-title>Advancing isotope-enabled model for atmospheric sulfur isotope effect</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>Lianfang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-458X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Xueshun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Wenyi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Zhe</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-6325</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Di</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0533-5574</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Huiyun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>Xiaole</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-9322</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>Yafang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4912-9879</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Pingqing</given-names></name>
          <email>fupingqing@tju.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6249-2280</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff7">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Zifa</given-names></name>
          <email>zifawang@mail.iap.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Extreme Meteorology, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Aerosol Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, School of Earth System Science,  Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Pingqing Fu (fupingqing@tju.edu.cn) and Zifa Wang (zifawang@mail.iap.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>11667</fpage><lpage>11682</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Lianfang Wei et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e218">The isotopic composition of atmospheric species provides fundamental insights into their sources, sinks, and chemical processes. Conventional end-member mixing models, however, cannot capture progressive isotopic evolution in open systems where mixing and reaction proceed simultaneously. This limitation hinders a comprehensive understanding of the isotope effect and its atmospheric applications. Here, we develop an isotope-enabled chemical transport model (CTM) that tracks four sulfur isotopologues (<sup>32</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>34</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>32</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <sup>34</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) through emissions, transport, chemistry, and deposition. An iterative time-splitting method reduces the numerical bias from applying the Rayleigh equation in the open atmosphere. The model reproduces the <sup>34</sup>S enrichment of sulfate relative to SO<sub>2</sub> and captures the spatial and seasonal patterns of the sulfur isotope effect across eastern China (simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰; observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). Further, the agreement between simulated (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ emission assumption) and observed sulfate isotopic compositions, combined with the documented higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S values of coal at 1 ‰–10 ‰ across eastern China, implies a systematic <sup>34</sup>S depletion in emitted SO<sub>2</sub> relative to fuels. This highlights the importance of considering isotopic fractionation during combustion, flue gas desulfurization and chemical processes for accurate source apportionment. The isotope-enabled model provides a new approach for constraining the sulfur budget.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2023YFC3710600</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>41907201</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42377105</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e474">Sulfate and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) have complex interactions with the environment and Earth's climate system, involving aerosol and cloud formation, climate cooling, and the global sulfur budget (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016). The primary sources of SO<sub>2</sub> emissions are from the combustion of sulfur-containing fuels (coal and oil, etc.) at power plants, industrial facilities, and residential heating (Crippa et al., 2023). The atmospheric oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> to sulfate has been extensively investigated through gas-phase reactions with OH radicals and heterogeneous/multiphase oxidation involving H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, and transition metal ion catalysis (TMI-catalysis).</p>
      <p id="d2e541">Recent investigations into sulfate isotopic composition have emerged as promising proxies for gaining fundamental insight into the sulfate's sources, sinks, and concentration-independent information on atmospheric oxidation processes. However, there remains a significant discrepancy among studies that use the end-member mixing model. Han et al. (2016a) emphasized the dominance of biological sulfur emissions in summer and coal combustion in winter. Lin et al. (2022) illustrated how isotopic fractionation significantly reshapes the sulfur isotopic composition in sulfate, leading to distinctive results of source apportionment. While Feng et al. (2023) highlighted the impact of sulfur isotopic fractionation during combustion on source apportionment, identifying traffic emissions (49 %) and coal combustion (46 %–65 %) as major contributors to sulfate during heavy pollution in the North China Plain. Discrepancies also arise in identifying the dominant SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation pathway. Fan et al. (2020) highlighted SO<sub>2</sub> oxidized by NO<sub>2</sub> and TMI-catalyzed O<sub>2</sub> as a key contributor to high sulfate loading using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While Han et al. (2022) revealed enhanced SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, supported by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses. Several limitations may explain these divergences. (1) Studies rely on the Rayleigh distillation equation, which is only suitable for closed systems with reservoir-limited conditions, leading to an increasing apparent isotope effect as the reservoir is progressively consumed (Guan and Liu, 2023). (2) Laboratory studies have indicated that the combustion process, atmospheric chemistry and mixing can reshape the sulfur isotopic composition from the sources of sulfur-containing fuels to SO<sub>2</sub> and sulfate.</p>
      <p id="d2e694">Therefore, our goal is to reconcile the ongoing debate among previous research findings related to sulfur isotope tracing and establish a comprehensive understanding of the atmospheric isotope effect. To achieve this, developing an isotope-enabled model that integrates isotopic chemistry and the isotopic fingerprints of emission sources is crucial. Recent applications have incorporated isotope effects into CTMs to simulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of atmospheric NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using CMAQ (Fang and Michalski, 2022) and mercury isotopic fractionation using GEOS-Chem (Song et al., 2022). These methodologies involve using isotopologues as prognostic tracers and scaling the rate constants of different isotopologues with their corresponding isotope fractionation factor. However, these models primarily focus on “gas-phase” or one-step unidirectional kinetic reactions. Sulfur chemistry involves heterogeneous and multiphase reactions with mass transfer, dissociation equilibrium, and chemical reaction. Determining reaction intermediates and their isotopic fractionation factors for each elementary step is therefore challenging. In addition, the isotope effects obtained from laboratory studies for complex reactions represent apparent or overall isotope effects. Consequently, the incorporation of isotopic chemistry into CTMs faces new challenges, especially with heterogeneous/multiphase reactions.</p>
      <p id="d2e731">In this study, we develop a new isotope-enabled model to simulate the isotopic compositions of sulfur-bearing species, considering both physical mixing and isotopic fractionation due to chemical reactions, and enabling the explicit simulation of progressive depletion/enrichment in the reservoir and their impact on sulfate production. The study aims to present a comprehensive description of the isotope-enabled model, evaluate its skill in reproducing the spatial-temporal variations in sulfur isotope composition, and deepen our understanding of the atmospheric sulfur isotope effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model framework</title>
      <p id="d2e749">We incorporate the isotopic chemistry module into the Eulerian atmospheric chemistry transport models NAQPMS. The NAQPMS is a Nested Air Quality Prediction Model System developed by the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (Wei et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2001), including physical processes (advection, diffusion, and dry/wet deposition), chemistry module (gas and aqueous chemistry, aerosol chemistry and thermodynamics, and mercury chemistry) (Chen et al., 2015), and online emission of dimethyl sulfide, sea salt, and dust. The Advanced Particle Microphysics module (APM) and 1.5-D Volatility Basis Set (VBS) aerosol schemes are also coupled to simulate the aerosol microphysical processes and organic aerosol formation, respectively (Chen et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d2e752">The simulation is performed with a two-way nested configuration. The external domain D1 covers the mainland of China at a horizontal resolution of 45 km, while the innermost domain D2 is centered over eastern China with a finer resolution of 15 km, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The model runs on 20 atmospheric vertical layers, utilizing terrain-following hybrid sigma coordinates from the surface to an altitude of 20 km. The sulfur chemistry from SO<sub>2</sub> to S(VI) involves gas, heterogeneous and aqueous-phase oxidation. The gas-phase chemistry incorporates the Carbon Bond Mechanism Z (CBM-Z) (Zaveri and Peters, 1999). For aqueous chemistry, the Regional Acid Deposition Model (RADM2) is applied, resolving cloud-phase sulfur oxidation through dissoluble S(IV) with O<sub>3</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, proxy acetic acid (CH<sub>3</sub>OOH), and transition metal-catalyzed O<sub>2</sub> (Stockwell et al., 1997). The oxidation of S(IV) species by dissolved NO<sub>2</sub> is also incorporated into the sulfur aqueous chemistry, referring to the kinetic parameters proposed by Cheng et al. (2016). Heterogeneous reactions of SO<sub>2</sub> on various surfaces, including dust, sea salt, soot and deliquesced aerosols, have also been incorporated using the reactive uptake coefficients parameterization (Li et al., 2018). The gas-particle partitioning of inorganic aerosols and aerosol water content are simulated using the improved ISORROPIA II (Fountoukis and Nenes, 2007; Song et al., 2018). The simulation began in March 2014. The initial 3 months served as a spin-up time. For additional details on the model and its detailed configuration, refer to Sect. S1 and Table S2 in the Supplement.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e830">Model domain and compiled sulfur isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S) data. The simulation uses a two-way nested configuration, with the parent domain D1 covering the Chinese mainland (45 km resolution) and the child domain D2 centered over eastern China (15 km resolution). Literature-reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S data are overlaid at sampling locations. Black, red, and green bars denote the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  standard deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of coal, aerosol sulfate, and wet precipitation sulfate, respectively. The small black bar near Inner Mongolia denotes coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S value only (regional mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), no aerosol or wet precipitation sulfate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S are available there. All values are in per mil (‰). Additional details on the observed data can be found in Table S1.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Isotope notation and isotopic fractionation</title>
      <p id="d2e923">The sulfur element is widely present throughout all natural environments and possesses four stable isotopes, namely <sup>32</sup>S, <sup>33</sup>S, <sup>34</sup>S, and <sup>36</sup>S, with relative abundances of 95.02 %, 0.75 %, 4.21 %, and 0.02 %, respectively (De Laeter et al., 2003). In general, the sulfur isotopic composition is denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S value in per mil (‰), where <sup><italic>x</italic></sup>S represents one of the less abundant isotopes, e.g., <sup>33</sup>S, <sup>34</sup>S, or <sup>36</sup>S. This notation is defined as the difference between the isotopic ratio of a given sample and the reference standard V-CDT (Vienna Canyon Diablo Troilite):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M71" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sample</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>V-CDT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the isotopic ratio, defined as the atomic abundance ratio of heavier to lighter stable isotope, expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the atomic abundances of the heavier stable isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and lighter stable isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. V-CDT is the international sulfur isotope standard, with isotopic ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<sup>34</sup>S/<sup>32</sup>S)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>V-CDT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.044163</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<sup>33</sup>S/<sup>32</sup>S)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>V-CDT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007877</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ding et al., 2001).</p>
      <p id="d2e1270">Isotope effects are observable in physical or chemical processes, especially during equilibrium (or thermodynamic) and kinetic processes, leading to a change in isotope distribution between two substances or different phases of the same substance with distinct isotope ratios. Isotopic fractionation is often a result of the isotope effect. The isotopic fractionation factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the ratio of isotopic ratio of the instantaneously formed product <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pi</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pi</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and substrate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Mariotti et al., 1981),

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M90" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pi</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1425">For thermodynamic (equilibrium) or unidirectional kinetic process with a single-step reaction following a first-order rate law, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be interpreted as the ratio of rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or equilibrium constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M94" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1516">An isotope enrichment factor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (in per mil ‰), can be defined as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M96" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1566">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determines how much faster or slower the reaction with the heavier isotopologues proceeds relative to the reaction with the lighter isotopologues.</p>
      <p id="d2e1591">Generally, isotopic fractionation determined in laboratory experiments represents overall isotope effects, resulting from physical, equilibrium, and kinetic fractionation. The isotopic composition between reservoir and product, as a function of reactant extent and fractionation factor, is described by the Rayleigh fractionation equation.</p>
      <p id="d2e1594"><disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M98" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fraction of residual reactant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the isotope ratio of substrate at initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> moment, respectively. The instantaneous isotope ratio of the product <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> moment is given by:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M106" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1832">The average isotope ratio of accumulated product (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) during a finite reaction interval follows the standard Rayleigh-fractionation expression for accumulated products (Hoefs, 2018):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M108" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Developing Isotope-Tagged Emission Inventories</title>
      <p id="d2e1937">The multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC, <uri>http://meicmodel.org.cn/?p=1579&amp;lang=en</uri>, last access: 11 August 2026) provides a comprehensive SO<sub>2</sub> emission inventory, including anthropogenic emissions from power plants, industry, residential, and transportation, respectively. Primary combustion sulfate, which forms as the oxidation product in the chimney and plumes (Sun et al., 2023; Ding et al., 2021), is assumed to be 5 wt % of anthropogenic SO<sub>2</sub> (Berglen et al., 2004). Anthropogenic sulfur-containing sources exhibit a highly variable and overlapping isotopic composition, ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰ to 30 ‰ (Hoefs and Harmon, 2022). We adopt a constant signature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ V-CDT for anthropogenic SO<sub>2</sub> emission sources. This simplification isolates the atmospheric chemical isotope effect from poorly constrained source signatures.</p>
      <p id="d2e1999">The sulfur isotope difference between SO<sub>2</sub> and sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub>) approximates the apparent isotopic fractionation multiplied by 1000 ‰ and is hereafter referred to as the isotope effect. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> is mathematically independent of the absolute emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S and can be therefore validate the oxidation module of isotope-enabled CTM. By contrast, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depend on the prescribed emission signature. Direct comparisons between simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are subject to the uncertainties of this assumption and should be interpreted with caution. Jointly examining the simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> together with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> provides a diagnostic of whether a given model–observation bias arises primarily from the atmospheric oxidation processes or from the assumed emission-source signatures.</p>
      <p id="d2e2353">The tracer mass of <sup>32</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>34</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>32</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <sup>34</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopologues can be determined from the SO<sub>2</sub> mass in the emission inventory based on the Eq. (1), with the initial values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>V-CDT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.044163.</p>
      <p id="d2e2465"><disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M154" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>V-CDT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Coupled methodology of isotopic chemistry module</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>2.4.1</label><title>The development of isotopic chemistry module</title>
      <p id="d2e2533">To dynamically simulate the spatiotemporal distribution of isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S) in particle SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its gaseous precursor SO<sub>2</sub>, we have implemented the tagging technology and isotopic chemistry module into the atmospheric chemistry transport model. The four isotopologues (<sup>32</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>34</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>32</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <sup>34</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are treated as independent prognostic tracers of SO<sub>2</sub> and sulfate aerosol throughout their entire atmospheric life cycle, including emission, transport, chemical production/loss, and deposition processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e2672">Generally, previous isotope-enabled models incorporating isotope chemistry typically only consider kinetic isotope fractionation, deriving different rate coefficients for individual isotopologues from isotopic fractionation factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with Eq. (4) (Fang and Michalski, 2022; Gromov et al., 2010). This assumption is suitable for single-step, steady-state reactions, such as gas-phase chemical reactions. However, most processes in natural systems involve reaction sequences; each reaction within the sequence exhibits its intrinsic isotope fractionation, and not all isotope fractionation of these individual reactions is measurable. For example, the cloud and aqueous-phase chemical module involve gas-to-particle equilibrium, dissolution, diffusion, and chemical reactions. Thus, the isotope effect observed in the complex system with multiple intermediates represents an overall isotope effect. If the reaction sequences have a given end product, the conventional approach for deriving the isotope effect requires repeated determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The isotope fractionation factor is then calculated using the Rayleigh equation as,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M171" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2805">When a substrate is consumed through multiple competing pathways simultaneously, the Rayleigh equation relates the change in the isotopic ratio of substrate to the extent of substrate consumption, employing the apparent overall isotopic fractionation factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Van Breukelen, 2007). The factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is expressed as a function of various instantaneous isotopic fractionation factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ins</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) associated with individual pathways, given by the following equation:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M175" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ins</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ins</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ins</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2913">Therefore, the sulfur isotopic ratio of the residual SO<sub>2</sub> within the grid cell can be determined using the following equation:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M177" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ins</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of contribution from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th process to the overall product.</p>
      <p id="d2e3046">To directly apply isotope fractionation factors measured in laboratory studies, we developed an independent isotopic chemistry module coupled to the host CTM, as illustrated in Fig. 2. The module utilizes Rayleigh-fractionation equations to calculate isotopologues changes between reactants and products, combined with the iterative time-splitting method described in Sect. 2.4.2 to reduce numerical bias. At each model time step, the module receives SO<sub>2</sub> loss and sulfate production separately from the gas-phase, heterogeneous, and cloud/aqueous-phase chemistry modules, and the relative contribution of each oxidation pathway is calculated and recorded. Temperature-dependent isotope fractionation factors are then updated in each grid cell according to the local temperature. The module tracks the net changes in four isotopologues (<sup>32</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>34</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>32</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <sup>34</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and updates their concentrations through an iterative time-splitting procedure, which divides each oxidation calculation into smaller SO<sub>2</sub> conversion sub-steps. Within each sub-step, isotope ratios are calculated using Rayleigh-fractionation equations, isotopic mass balance is enforced, and the isotopic composition of the reactant reservoir and accumulated product is updated. The full algorithm framework is further documented in Sect. S2.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3158">Algorithmic framework of the isotope-enabled CTM and the isotopic chemistry module. <bold>(a)</bold> Host CTM framework, including the main physical and chemical modules (gas-phase chemistry, aerosol chemistry and thermodynamics, cloud and aqueous chemistry, advection, diffusion, and dry and wet deposition) and their coupling with the isotopic chemistry module. <bold>(b)</bold> The workflow of the isotopic chemistry module. At each time step, the module tracks net SO<sub>2</sub> and sulfate changes, calculates reaction fractions, updates temperature-dependent fractionation factors, applies iterative time splitting, computes isotope ratios via Rayleigh-fractionation equations, performs isotopic mass balance, and updates the isotope ratios of the reactant reservoir and accumulated product.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3182">Based on the assumptions outlined in Sect. S1, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S is primarily influenced by fractionation during different chemical reactions. Relevant sulfur isotopic fractionation data have been sourced from laboratory studies conducted by Harris et al. (2012b, 2012a, 2012c, 2013), including the gas-phase oxidation by OH radicals, aqueous-phase oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and iron catalysis, heterogeneous oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> on sea salt aerosol and mineral dust (see Table 1). The sulfur isotopic fractionation during SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation by NO<sub>2</sub> in the aqueous phase, as determined by Yang et al. (2018), is excluded from this study. This exclusion is attributed to their methodology, which yielded an apparent isotopic fractionation factor calculated by dividing the isotopic ratio of accumulated production by the initial isotope ratio of reactant. This calculation assumed that R<sub>pi</sub> was approximated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being approximately 1. This approach contrasts with the conventional definition of the isotope fractionation factor, which typically represents the isotope ratio in the instantaneously formed product in an infinitely short time divided by that of the reactant (Eq. 2) (Harris et al., 2013; Hoefs, 2018; Mariotti et al., 1981). For reference in our discussion, the apparent isotopic fractionation factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>NO<sub>2</sub></sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 3 °C) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.998</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is adopted in the simulation.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3330">The sulfur isotopic fractionation factor determined by the lab experiment and its temperature dependency for a specific oxidation pathway.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oxidation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reaction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Symbol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Model isotope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dependence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pathway</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">fractionation factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(°C<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (at 0 °C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S(IV) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH⚫</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gas-phase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>OH</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0106</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Harris et al. (2012a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S(IV) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aqueous-phase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0165</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.085</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Harris et al. (2012a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S(IV) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aqueous-phase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>O<sub>3</sub></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0167</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.085</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Harris et al. (2012a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S(IV) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>2</sub> (TMI catalyzed)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aqueous-phase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>TMI</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9949</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.237</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Harris et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S(IV) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>2</sub> (TMI catalyzed)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">On mineral dust</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>TMI_surface</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0096 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Harris et al. (2012b)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S(IV) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">On the sea salt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>seasalt</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0124 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Harris et al. (2012c)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S(IV) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aqueous-phase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>NO<sub>2</sub></sub>*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.998 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yang et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e3333">We consider the temperature dependence of the isotopic fractionation factor by utilizing the real-time temperature of the grid cell, thus avoiding a significant effect on the seasonal simulation of isotopic composition.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the apparent isotopic fractionation factor during SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation by NO<sub>2</sub> in the aqueous phase at 3 °C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>NO<sub>2</sub></sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 3 °C) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.998</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00041</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was determined by Yang et al. (2018). In their laboratory experiment, SO<sub>2</sub> was oxidized by NO<sub>2</sub> in a reaction chamber containing liquid water. The isotopic composition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S in the initial SO<sub>2</sub> and accumulated sulfate product after 2 h of reaction time was collected and measured. However, the residual fraction of SO<sub>2</sub> was not measured, and the apparent isotopic fractionation factor was calculated by dividing the isotopic ratio of accumulated production by the ratio of reactant. As the reaction progresses, the isotopic composition of the accumulated product changes. Once the reactants are completely consumed, the isotopic composition of the accumulated product is equal to the initial reactants (See Fig. 3). Therefore, according to the isotope mass balance, the apparent isotopic fractionation factor is highly dependent on the residual fraction during the reaction process, and cannot be equal to the exact isotopic fractionation factor, which is represented by the isotope ratio in the instantaneously formed product divided by the ratio in the reactant. Although the detected apparent isotopic fractionation factor can indicate the direction of isotopic fractionation (enrichment or depletion in the product relative to the reactant), it cannot be directly used in the model to calculate the isotope effect of S(IV) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> pathway.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4076">Rayleigh plot for sulfur isotope fractionations during SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation in a closed system with no external input and irreversible product removal. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S values of the residual reactant (solid black line), instantaneous product (blue dotted line), and accumulated product (blue dashed line) are shown as a function of the fraction of remaining reactant based on a Rayleigh equation, with the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of SO<sub>2</sub> set to 0 ‰. Three scenarios are illustrated: <bold>(a)</bold> aqueous-phase H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> oxidation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0165</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0 °C), <bold>(b)</bold> aqueous-phase TMI-catalyzed oxidation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9949</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0 °C), and <bold>(c)</bold> the net isotope effect under competing S(IV) oxidation pathways (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0063</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0 °C). The pathway contributions in panel <bold>(c)</bold> competing S(IV) oxidation pathways – gas-phase OH oxidation (42.6 %), aqueous H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> oxidation (2.2 %), O<sub>3</sub> oxidation (1.3 %), TMI-catalyzed oxidation (27.2 %), and heterogeneous reactions (26.7 %) – are derived from GEOS-Chem simulations (Shao et al., 2019).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>2.4.2</label><title>Improving isotopic chemistry simulation with the iterative time-splitting method</title>
      <p id="d2e4256">In CTM, numerical integration is crucial for solving the kinetic equations of chemical mechanisms. In the gas-phase module, the CBMZ mechanism is coupled with the LSODES solver (the sparse version of the Livermore ODE solver) to integrate the chemical transformations and provide species concentration changes over time. In the cloud and aqueous chemistry module, the gas–aqueous partitioning is determined by instantaneous Henry's law equilibrium; at each step, a bisection method estimates pH and ionic speciation under electroneutrality and thermodynamic equilibrium, and a forward Euler solver integrates the aqueous-phase sulfur oxidation reactions, with chemical equilibrium reestablished after each incremental oxidation step.</p>
      <p id="d2e4259">The classical Rayleigh distillation equation assumes that (i) the product, once formed, is immediately and irreversibly removed with no further isotopic exchange, and (ii) the reservoir receives no external input, the reactants being consumed solely by the fractionating reaction. These assumptions do not hold in the open atmosphere. Within a single integration step (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min), the reactant reservoir in each grid cell is continuously influenced by emissions, advection, and diffusive mixing. Because mixing and fractionation occur simultaneously, applying the Rayleigh equation over the full-time step, especially under a large conversion fraction, makes the isotopic composition sensitive to the residual fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which itself depends on time discretization and reaction-rate constants. This artificially amplifies the apparent enrichment or depletion in the residual reactant, producing the so-called reservoir effect. Mitigating this bias provides the numerical motivation for the iterative time-splitting method used here.</p>
      <p id="d2e4283">To reduce the numerical bias that can arise when the Rayleigh equation is applied directly over a finite CTM time step in an open atmospheric system, we introduce an iterative time-splitting method that divides each oxidation calculation into smaller conversion sub-steps and updates the isotopic composition iteratively. Within each main time step, the total reactant supplied by emissions, advection, and mixing is apportioned across the sub-steps. At the start of each sub-step, the reactant concentration and isotope ratio are updated by incorporating the freshly allocated reactant, after which the Rayleigh equation is applied under the approximately closed conditions of that sub-step, where the conversion fraction is kept below 2 %. This ensures that isotope fractionation is computed incrementally in the presence of continuous fresh input, rather than over the full model time step. In addition, we derive an exact integration solution describing the isotopic evolution of the reservoir in an open system with simultaneous fresh input and product removal (Sect. S3). By comparing the iterative method against this exact benchmark, we determine the optimal sub-step size that minimizes the discrepancy between the Rayleigh-based calculation and the open-system solution; further sensitivity tests are presented in Sect. 3.1.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d2e4296">Building upon the isotope-enabled modeling framework established in Sect. 2, we evaluate the model's performance. The evaluation proceeds in two stages. First, we validate the iterative time-splitting method incorporated into the isotopic chemistry calculation (Sect. 3.1), demonstrating that our approach adequately resolves the isotope evolution in open systems with simultaneous mixing and reaction. Second, we assess the model's ability to capture observed sulfur isotope signatures, focusing on the sulfur isotope effect (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub>) and the site- and season-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across eastern China (Sect. 3.2).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Improving isotopic chemistry simulation and sensitivity tests</title>
      <p id="d2e4381">In previous studies, the initial isotopic composition of reactant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated based on the isotopic composition of the product (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the residual fraction of reactants <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the Rayleigh equation, assuming no addition or mixing. This resulted in isotopic “reservoir effects” as the reaction progressed. The isotopic fractionation factor determines the direction of fractionation: when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, heavy isotopes are preferentially enriched in the product and depleted in the residual reservoir; conversely, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, heavy isotopes are preferentially depleted in the product and enriched in the residual reservoir.</p>
      <p id="d2e4446">To illustrate the magnitude of the reservoir effect under realistic atmospheric conditions, we consider the competing S(IV) oxidation pathways: gas-phase OH radicals, aqueous-phase H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and TMI-catalysis, and heterogeneous reaction. Using model results from Shao et al. (2019), who employed the GEOS-Chem model to quantify the contributions of these competing pathways to sulfate formation during a Beijing pollution episode, their reported contributions are 42.6 %, 2.2 %, 1.3 %, 27.2 %, and 26.7 %, respectively. Based on these pathway contributions, the calculated overall/net sulfur fractionation factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<sub>S(IV)</sub> is 1.0063 at 0 °C. Therefore, the sulfate product favors the heavier isotopologues <sup>34</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over <sup>32</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the reaction progresses. This relationship depends on the fractionation fraction and the reaction extent. As shown in Fig. 3, with the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of SO<sub>2</sub> set to 0 ‰, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drops to 70 % and 20 %, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of the residual SO<sub>2</sub> reaches approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of the accumulated sulfate product reaches approximately 5.2 ‰ and 2.5 ‰, respectively. The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> is 7.4 ‰ and 12.5 ‰. As the reservoir approaches depletion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the apparent isotope fractionation becomes unrealistically large. This challenges the direct application of the Rayleigh equation to systems where mixing and reaction occur simultaneously.</p>
      <p id="d2e4730">Using the integration method that describes the isotopic evolution of the reservoir in an open system (Sect. S3), Fig. S1 illustrates that as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value (the ratio of the instantaneous amount added to the removal) increases, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of the reservoir progressively gets higher, with the external sources consistently contributing with a constant isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 10 ‰. This emphasizes the importance of considering the mixing process when calculating the isotope effect. The overall apparent isotope fractionations are indeed the result of combined effects of the Rayleigh-like distillation process and the diffusion-driven isotope distributions (Guan and Liu, 2023). The combined processes with the mixing of fresh material and isotopic fractionation can lead to a smaller variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> than estimated by Rayleigh equation. These results indicate that the optimal sub-timesteps effectively reduce the time-step impact and minimize discrepancies between the Rayleigh-based calculation and the integration method.</p>
      <p id="d2e4805">To mitigate the numerical bias that can arise when the Rayleigh equation is applied directly over a finite CTM time step, we implement an iterative time-splitting method. Firstly, the comparison between this iterative method and integration method in the open system helps determine the optimal sub-timesteps, effectively minimizing the biases in isotopic calculation when employing the Rayleigh equation. Figure S2 illustrates that the largest differences are observed for small reaction fraction and large fraction of fresh mixture relative to the initial substrate. A larger difference is expected when the differences between the isotopic composition of substrate and mixture increase and the isotope effect becomes stronger. For 50 sub-timesteps, good agreements are found in the calculated isotopic value of the reservoir between the iterative time-splitting method and the integrating method, assuming 0.3 ‰ is approximate to the average analytical precision of isotope. This indicates that the combination of the Rayleigh equation with the iterative method is capable of effectively simulating the progressive isotopic evolution of reservoirs with simultaneous mixing and isotopic fractionation.</p>
      <p id="d2e4809">We also conduct sensitivity tests to check the performance of the simulated isotopic composition of product with the optimized sub-timesteps. We choose 0.3 ‰ as the tolerance of this iterative time-splitting method. Figure S3 illustrates the deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values for 1, 10, 50, and 100 sub-steps relative to the reference simulation with 1000 sub-steps. Notably, the largest deviation occurs for a large fraction of reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and mixture, attributed to greater depletion in the reservoirs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and influence of mixing process. For 50 sub-steps, the maximum deviation is less than 0.1 ‰. This comparison confirms that the sub-timestep limiting reaction fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to approximately 2 % is acceptable for reducing simulation bias, thus the value is adopted to improve the simulation.</p>
      <p id="d2e4845">The numerical comparison further shows that the largest differences between the direct Rayleigh calculation and the iterative method occur mainly over remote oceanic regions, where SO<sub>2</sub> emissions are low, reaction extents are high, and the SO<sub>2</sub> reservoir effect is strongest; in these regions, the iterative method reduces the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> by approximately 1.5 ‰–3.0 ‰ relative to the direct Rayleigh calculation applied over the full model time step. In regions with intensive anthropogenic activity, the influence is smaller but still non-negligible, with changes of approximately 0.3 ‰–1.0 ‰ in some polluted areas, demonstrating that the iterative time-splitting method improves the numerical accuracy of simulated sulfur isotope fractionation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Model evaluation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Evaluation of sulfur isotope effect</title>
      <p id="d2e4928">As shown in Table 1, the sulfur isotopes exhibit distinctive fractionation during chemical reactions, including gas-phase, aqueous-phase, and heterogeneous reactions. It provides valuable information for investigating the relative importance of the different oxidation pathways converting SO<sub>2</sub> to sulfate. Gas-phase and aqueous-phase oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> produces sulfate that is enriched in <sup>34</sup>S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, depending on pH and temperature) relative to the initial SO<sub>2</sub> reservoir, while the SO<sub>2</sub> reservoir becomes depleted in <sup>34</sup>S. In contrast, TMI-catalyzed oxidation produces sulfate depleted in <sup>34</sup>S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) relative to initial SO<sub>2</sub> (Harris et al., 2012c, 2012a, 2013, 2012b).</p>
      <p id="d2e5057">Figures 4 and 5 show the simulated spatial-temporal distribution of near-surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual sulfur oxidation pathways through controlled experiments. We focus on the simulation results for the isotope effect resulting from individual sulfur oxidation pathways. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of all emission sources is assumed to be 0 ‰. The model predicts a daily-mean range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 8 ‰, 2 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, 0 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ via gas-phase oxidation by OH radical, and cloud-phase oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, TMI-catalyzed O<sub>2</sub> over eastern China, respectively. Correspondingly, a depleted <sup>34</sup>S in SO<sub>2</sub>, and the daily-mean range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, and 0.5 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, respectively. A relatively homogeneous spatial pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is observed for gas-phase oxidation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), whereas aqueous-phase oxidations show more heterogeneous spatial distributions. The simulated spatial-temporal distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on the relative importance of different oxidation pathways and the ratio of mixed SO<sub>2</sub> to formed sulfate within each model time step. Unlike gas-phase reactions, cloud and aqueous phase chemistry highly depend on the geographical distribution of cloud coverage and liquid water content. The spatial distribution of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub> is more sensitive to the mixing rate of SO<sub>2</sub>; in eastern China, where SO<sub>2</sub> emission intensity is high, the reservoir effect is effectively offset, resulting in slight regional differences.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e5448">Simulated spatial distribution of near-surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub> for individual sulfur oxidation pathways. Each panel shows the result of a sensitivity experiment in which only one oxidation pathway is active: <bold>(a)</bold> gas-phase oxidation by OH radical, <bold>(b)</bold> cloud-phase oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, <bold>(c)</bold> cloud-phase oxidation by O<sub>3</sub>, and <bold>(d)</bold> cloud-phase oxidation by TMI-catalyzed O<sub>2</sub>. All simulations are for December 2015. The sulfur isotopic composition of all emission sources is set to 0 ‰ to minimize the impact of source fingerprint, reflecting the direction and magnitude of the isotope fractionation specific to each pathway. Positive values indicate <sup>34</sup>S enrichment in residual SO<sub>2</sub>; negative values indicate depletion.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e5548">Same as Fig. 4, but for near-surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Panels show sensitivity experiments with individual oxidation pathways active: <bold>(a)</bold> gas-phase OH, <bold>(b)</bold> aqueous-phase H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, <bold>(c)</bold> aqueous-phase O<sub>3</sub>, and <bold>(d)</bold> TMI-catalyzed O<sub>2</sub> oxidation, all for December 2015 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub> emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰. Positive values indicate <sup>34</sup>S enrichment in sulfate; negative values indicate depletion.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e5674">We evaluate the oxidation isotope module using the sulfur isotope effect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub>, the isotopic difference between sulfate and SO<sub>2</sub>. Because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> depends on the relative isotope fractionation among oxidation pathways rather than on the absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of emitted SO<sub>2</sub>, it is less sensitive to source isotopic assumptions and provides a more direct evaluation of the oxidation module.</p>
      <p id="d2e5799">Simultaneous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S observations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> sulfate and SO<sub>2</sub> are available at Nanjing (118.5° E, 32.1° N) for summer (6 July to 30 August 2014) and winter (1–23 January 2015) (Chen et al., 2017). As shown in Fig. 6b, the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> averaged 5.50 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (summer) and 6.54 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (winter), compared with the observed means of 3.27 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (summer, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and 3.39 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (winter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), respectively. The overall simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, compared to the observed mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰. The model captures the enrichment direction and seasonal variation but systematically overestimates the magnitude. This overestimation is physically consistent with the underrepresented <sup>34</sup>S-depleting TMI-catalyzed oxidation pathway and the absence of aerosol water multiphase chemistry in the current mechanism. Further discussion is in Sect. 4.1.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e6070">Comparison between simulated and observed sulfur isotope composition over eastern China. <bold>(a)</bold> Simulated seasonal mean spatial distributions of sulfur isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over eastern China for summer (June–August) and winter (December–February) of 2015. <bold>(b)</bold> Comparison of simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> at Nanjing during the summer and winter 2014. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> primarily reflects oxidation-induced isotope fractionation and is less sensitive to the assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of emission sources, providing a more direct evaluation of the oxidation isotope module. <bold>(c)</bold> Seasonal comparison of simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PM<sub>2.5</sub> across multiple cities in eastern China, simulated values correspond to the same seasonal periods as the observations at each site. In panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>, “Obs” denotes observation and “Sim” denotes simulation.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Site- and season-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e6370">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> evaluation at Nanjing (Sect. 3.2.1) shows that the oxidation module captures the direction and seasonal variability of the isotope effect, albeit with a systematic overestimation. We next compare the simulated absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with observations, noting that absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is influenced by both oxidation fractionation and the assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of emitted SO<sub>2</sub>. Figure 6c presents the model's comparison with a compilation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations across eastern China, including Beijing (Han et al., 2016b; Han et al., 2017; Wei et al., 2018), Tianjin (Han et al., 2022; Ding et al., 2022), Nanjing (Chen et al., 2017), and Hangzhou city (Lin et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d2e6525">The simulated daily mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Nanjing and Hangzhou do not significantly differ from the observed values. Specifically, for Nanjing, the simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 3.88 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and 4.01 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ in summer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), and 6.47 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and 4.80 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ in winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), respectively. For Hangzhou, the simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 3.91 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and 3.50 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ in summer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), and 4.63 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and 4.95 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ in winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), respectively. Regarding Tianjin, the simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 3.88 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and 4.20 ‰<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ in winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), the model (4.40 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) slightly overestimates observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.75 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) in summer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). This difference remains within the acceptable 2 ‰ range for the sulfur isotope effect, considering a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % uncertainty in the relative significance of enriched or depleted sulfur oxidation pathways. However, the model (3.99 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) underestimates the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7.94 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) about 50 % in Beijing winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e7110">The model evaluation in Sect. 3 demonstrates that the isotope-enabled framework captures the enrichment direction and seasonal variability of the sulfur isotope effect. However, site- and season-dependent biases remain, including the systematic overestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> and the wintertime underestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Beijing. Section 4.1 discusses the sources of the biases. Section 4.2 extends the discussion to broader implications inferred by combining model results with literature evidence. It examines how isotopic fractionation during combustion and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) processes may reconcile the apparent offset between fuel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S values and observed aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S, and discusses what this implies for source apportionment studies.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Model-demonstrated results: oxidation-driven versus source-driven biases</title>
      <p id="d2e7218">The overestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> at Nanjing (NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 %–55 %) is attributed to the insufficient representation of the TMI-catalyzed oxidation pathway – the only known oxidation pathway that produces sulfate depleted in <sup>34</sup>S relative to SO<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9949</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). Previous studies have indicated that the aqueous-phase TMI-catalyzed oxidation pathway is underestimated in the current atmospheric chemical transport models, contributing 9 %–18 % to sulfate production globally (Alexander et al., 2009; Itahashi et al., 2022), while heterogeneous reactions via TMI-catalyzed oxidation on deliquesced aerosol particles can contribute 14 %–92 % to sulfate production during the heavy pollution period in northern China (Shao et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021). Furthermore, model parameterizations of Fe and Mn concentrations are biased low in East Asia (Itahashi et al., 2022), which directly suppresses the simulated TMI-catalyzed sulfate production. Our model does not currently include TMI-catalyzed oxidation in aerosol liquid water. Instead, we employ the obtained sulfur isotope fractionation during heterogeneous oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> on mineral dust (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Harris et al., 2012b) to represent the overall isotope effect of all heterogeneous reactions at the interface of deliquesced aerosol particles, which likely introduces additional biases. Currently, laboratory studies also show enhanced multiphase oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> by NO<sub>2</sub> in deliquesced aerosol particles (Wang et al., 2016; Liu and Abbatt, 2021), but isotopic fractionation factors for this pathway are currently lacking and require further measurement.</p>
      <p id="d2e7355">The site- and season-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> biases can be grouped into two categories: Category 1  –  Oxidation-driven biases. At Nanjing, Hangzhou, and Tianjin winter, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> biases are broadly consistent in direction with the known overestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> by the oxidation module. This confirms that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ assumption is a reasonable approximation for the well-mixed regional SO<sub>2</sub> emissions at these locations. The remaining bias is therefore predominantly oxidation-driven, reflecting the underrepresented TMI-catalyzed pathway and simplified heterogeneous chemistry noted above.</p>
      <p id="d2e7495">Category 2 – Source-driven biases. By contrast, at Beijing winter, the model (3.99 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.86 ‰) underestimates observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7.94 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.41 ‰) by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (NMB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). This contrasts with the oxidation module's upward bias in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S, which would drive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above observation. This reversed bias direction provides a clear diagnostic that the dominant error originates from the source assumption rather than from the oxidation module.</p>
      <p id="d2e7604">As shown in Fig. 1 and Table S1, documented coal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S in northern China  –  including Beijing, Hebei, and Henan  –  are substantially higher than 0 ‰, with means of 7.4 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, 3.5 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, and 6.4 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, respectively. Enhanced residential heating in northern China contributes about 46 % of the monthly averaged PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration (Zhang et al., 2017), providing a localized source of SO<sub>2</sub> with elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S. If Beijing winter SO<sub>2</sub> carries <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (the mean coal value) instead of 0 ‰, the modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would increase from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6–7 ‰ after accounting for oxidation-driven enrichment, approaching the observed 7.94 ‰. Consequently, the distinct seasonal shift in energy type (coal, biomass, clean energy, etc.) and activity (cooking, heating, etc.) can substantially affect aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wei et al., 2018), complicating direct model–observation comparisons where strong localized combustion sources are present.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Interpretive implications: combining model results with literature evidence</title>
      <p id="d2e7790">The preceding discussion reflects what is directly resolved by the isotope-enabled model. We now extend the discussion to broader implications inferred by combining our model results with literature evidence on emission-source isotopic signatures, combustion fractionation, and FGD.</p>
      <p id="d2e7793">Assuming a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub> of 0 ‰ for all anthropogenic emissions of SO<sub>2</sub>, the model's ability to reproduce observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. 3.2.2) suggests that well-mixed anthropogenic SO<sub>2</sub> emissions are characterized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S values close to 0 ‰. However, compiled anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S values of SO<sub>2</sub> emission sources in eastern China, including coal, crude oil, and biomass, range from 1 ‰ to 10 ‰ (Hong et al., 1993; Guo et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017). This discrepancy points to a systematic <sup>34</sup>S depletion process in emitted SO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7912">As shown in Fig. 7, residential and industrial combustion experiments show that the sulfate in ash particles enriched <sup>34</sup>S, while emitted SO<sub>2</sub> is depleted in <sup>34</sup>S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) relative to the fuel (Hong et al., 1993; Chen et al., 2017). FGD further introduces isotopic fractionation, with the outlet SO<sub>2</sub> isotopically lighter than the inlet SO<sub>2</sub> (calculated apparent sulfur isotope enrichment factors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (Derda et al., 2007). These documented combustion and FGD fractionation patterns are temporally consistent with the abrupt decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with continuous long-term aerosol observation (shifting from 5 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ before 1999 to 0 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ at Tsuruoka, Japan) (Oduro et al., 2012) and wet precipitation records (from 6.6 ‰ in 2010 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ in 2017 at Jiaozuo city, China) (Zheng et al., 2024). This observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S decline coincides with the widespread adoption of FGD technology in coal-fired industries after 2000 (Liu, 2019), although other concurrent factors  –  such as changes in the relative contribution of coal, oil, and biomass combustion sources, shifts in the geographic distribution of SO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and variations in atmospheric oxidation pathways  –  may also contribute to the observed trends. Establishing a direct causal linkage between FGD deployment and the recorded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S decline would require a dedicated study combining long-term field observations with systematic source sampling and experimental study of isotopic fractionation during combustion and FGD processes, which is beyond the scope of the present analysis. This temporal coherence, nevertheless, suggests that FGD-induced isotopic fractionation is a plausible contributing factor worth further investigation.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e8090">Schematic diagram of different processes and associated isotope enrichment factors for transformations of major sulfur-containing species to biogenic, anthropogenic, and sea-salt sulfate in the atmosphere. The sulfur isotopic compositions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S) of anthropogenic sources (coal, crude oil, and biomass, etc.) in eastern China are compiled from Hong et al. (1993), Guo et al. (2016) and Chen et al. (2017). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of sea-salt sulfate, DMS, MSA, biogenic sulfate, and the apparent enrichment factor during atmospheric oxidation of DMS to MSA are referenced from Oduro et al. (2012). The isotope enrichment factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for oxidation pathways of sulfur are listed in Table 1. Apparent enrichment factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during residential combustion are investigated by Hong et al. (1993) and Chen et al. (2017). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during industrial combustion and FGD are reported by Hong et al. (1993) and Derda et al. (2007), respectively. Because the combustion experiments are not comparable to the carefully controlled environment of laboratory studies, these experiments cannot yield accurate sulfur isotopic fractionation factors, thus, we employ the sulfur isotope difference between initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of sulfur-containing fuels and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of outlet-emitted SO<sub>2</sub> to interpret <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during combustion and FGD processes.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11667/2026/acp-26-11667-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e8193">Additionally, the sulfur oxidation pathway produces enriched sulfate with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<sub>2</sub> at 6 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 ‰. The emission-side <sup>34</sup>S depletion and the oxidation-side <sup>34</sup>S enrichment thus partly counterbalance each other, leading to only a modest net difference between fuel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S and airborne sulfate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S (typically 1 ‰–8 ‰) (Fig. 7). This emphasizes a complex isotope effect of sulfur chemistry during combustion and FGD. Using fuel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S directly as the SO<sub>2</sub> source end-member  –  without correcting for the <sup>34</sup>S depletion introduced by combustion and FGD  –  artificially elevates the source signature, causing systematic underestimation of the contribution of sulfur-containing fuels with significant combustion fractionation and overestimation of sources with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S near 0 ‰. An independent study by Feng et al. (2023) quantified this effect: using high-time-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S observations during haze episodes in northern China, they found that neglecting coal-combustion <sup>34</sup>S fractionation caused the coal contribution to be underestimated by 17 %–38 % of secondary sulfate. These quantitative findings corroborate the deductive evidence from our model and underscore the necessity of incorporating both emission-side and oxidation-side isotopic fractionation into the end-member framework for reliable source apportionment.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions and future atmospheric implications</title>
      <p id="d2e8361">Isotopic fingerprints of atmospheric chemicals provide essential constraints on their sources and chemical pathways. Here, we developed an isotope-enabled CTM to overcome the limitations of conventional mixing models. The model tracks four sulfur isotopologues (<sup>32</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>34</sup>SO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>32</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <sup>34</sup>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and uses an iterative time-splitting method to reduce the Rayleigh-equation bias in open atmosphere. It reproduces pathway-specific fractionation: gas-phase (OH) and aqueous-phase (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/O<sub>3</sub>) oxidation enriches sulfate in <sup>34</sup>S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), while TMI-catalyzed reactions deplete <sup>34</sup>S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). The model captures sulfate <sup>34</sup>S enrichment and the spatial and seasonal patterns of the sulfur isotope effect across eastern China (simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰; observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰).</p>
      <p id="d2e8631">The remaining site- and season-dependent biases can be separated into two diagnostic categories. The systematic overestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is primarily attributable to the underrepresented contribution of the <sup>34</sup>S-depleting TMI-catalyzed pathway, simplified heterogeneous chemistry (using mineral dust <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the absence of aerosol water multiphase chemistry  –  well-recognized limitations common to current-generation CTMs. By contrast, the wintertime underestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Beijing represents a source-driven bias. Because the trend reverses the direction expected from oxidation-induced fractionation, this indicates that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ assumption – rather than the oxidation module – is the dominant source of error in regions where strong localized combustion sources have elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S. This bias attribution allows the model to distinguish oxidation-driven from source-driven biases and to constrain oxidation-pathway contributions.</p>
      <p id="d2e8748">Taken together with the documented higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S values of coal (1 ‰–10 ‰), the model's ability to reproduce observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ emission assumption implies that combustion- and FGD-related <sup>34</sup>S depletion in emitted SO<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰; Derda et al., 2007) is largely counterbalanced by the <sup>34</sup>S enrichment during atmospheric SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 ‰). This counterbalancing explains why ambient sulfate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S is often close to that of sulfur-containing fuels. Neglecting the emission-side fractionation therefore introduces systematic bias into isotope-based source apportionment, underestimating the contribution of fuels with significant combustion fractionation while overestimating sources with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S near 0 ‰. Our study highlights that incorporating both emission-side and oxidation-side fractionation into source apportionment frameworks is therefore essential for reliable results.</p>
      <p id="d2e8926">Our study also informs future sampling by proposing simultaneous measurement of the isotopic composition of gaseous precursors and aerosols, which would improve the interpretation of isotopic effects during chemical processes and enable more accurate source identification. Nevertheless, conducting direct comparisons between simulations and field observations remains challenging, primarily due to the limited availability and large uncertainties of the isotopic composition adopted in the emission inventory. Future investigations into the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S of sulfur-containing emission sources and measurements of isotopic fractionation during combustion, FGD, and multiphase chemical reactions will help improve the simulation. By explicitly resolving the dynamic isotopic evolution of reactant reservoirs, the isotope-enabled model further shows that the reservoir effect in open systems is less pronounced than estimated by the conventional Rayleigh equation. Overall, by providing additional isotopic constraints, the model offers a framework for interpreting sulfur isotope effects and for reducing uncertainties in sulfur chemistry and budgets.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8944">The compiled observation data and model output in our work are available via Wei  (2024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14357423" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14357423</ext-link>). The developed isotopic chemistry module is available on Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14724954" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14724954</ext-link>) as Wei (2025).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e8953">Supporting descriptions of CTM and model configuration, the algorithm framework of the isotopic chemistry module, the derivation of the stable isotopic composition of the reservoir in open systems, additional data, figures, and tables are given in the Supplement. The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11667-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11667-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e8962">L.W., Zi.W. and P.F. designed research; L.W., X.C., J.L. and W.Y. developed the isotope-enabled model; L.W., X.C., Zh.W., Y.C., D.L., H.D. and X.P. made a discussion on the algorithm; L.W. and X.C. performed the modeling experiments; L.W. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e8968">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e8974">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e8980">L. Wei thanks Chinese Scholarship Council for financial support of her research at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry. The authors would like to thank Prof. Huiming Bao of International Center for Isotope Effects Research (ICIER) of Nanjing University for helpful discussions on topics related to this work.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e8985">This research has been supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant No. 2023YFC3710600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 41907201, 42377105) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant No. 2018M641451).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e8991">This paper was edited by Pedro Jimenez-Guerrero and reviewed by four anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Gong, S.: Transition metal-catalyzed oxidation of atmospheric sulfur: Global implications for the sulfur budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D010486, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010486</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Berglen, T. F., Berntsen, T. K., Isaksen, I. S., and Sundet, J. K.: A global model of the coupled sulfur/oxidant chemistry in the troposphere: The sulfur cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D003948, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003948</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Chen, H. S., Wang, Z. F., Li, J., Tang, X., Ge, B. Z., Wu, X. L., Wild, O., and Carmichael, G. R.: GNAQPMS-Hg v1.0, a global nested atmospheric mercury transport model: model description, evaluation and application to trans-boundary transport of Chinese anthropogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2857–2876, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2857-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-2857-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chen, S. L., Guo, Z. Y., Guo, Z. B., Guo, Q. J., Zhang, Y. L., Zhu, B., and Zhang, H. X.: Sulfur isotopic fractionation and its implication: Sulfate formation in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and coal combustion under different conditions, Atmos. Res., 194, 142–149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.04.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.04.034</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Wang, Z., Li, J., and Yu, F.: Development of a regional chemical transport model with size-resolved aerosol microphysics and its application on aerosol number concentration simulation over China, SOLA, 10, 83–87, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2014-017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2151/sola.2014-017</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Yang, W., Wang, Z., Li, J., Hu, M., An, J., Wu, Q., Wang, Z., Chen, H., and Wei, Y.: Improving new particle formation simulation by coupling a volatility-basis set (VBS) organic aerosol module in NAQPMS+ APM, Atmos. Environ., 204, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.053</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Yu, F., Yang, W., Sun, Y., Chen, H., Du, W., Zhao, J., Wei, Y., Wei, L., Du, H., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Li, J., An, J., and Wang, Z.: Global–regional nested simulation of particle number concentration by combing microphysical processes with an evolving organic aerosol module, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9343–9366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9343-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-9343-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Zheng, G., Wei, C., Mu, Q., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Gao, M., Zhang, Q., He, K., and Carmichael, G.: Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China, Sci. Adv., 2, e1601530, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.1601530</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Butler, T., Keating, T., Wu, R., Kaminski, J., Kuenen, J., Kurokawa, J., Chatani, S., Morikawa, T., Pouliot, G., Racine, J., Moran, M. D., Klimont, Z., Manseau, P. M., Mashayekhi, R., Henderson, B. H., Smith, S. J., Suchyta, H., Muntean, M., Solazzo, E., Banja, M., Schaaf, E., Pagani, F., Woo, J.-H., Kim, J., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Pisoni, E., Zhang, J., Niemi, D., Sassi, M., Ansari, T., and Foley, K.: The HTAP_v3 emission mosaic: merging regional and global monthly emissions (2000–2018) to support air quality modelling and policies, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2667–2694, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>De Laeter, J. R., Böhlke, J. K., De Bièvre, P., Hidaka, H., Peiser, H. S., Rosman, K. J. R., and Taylor, P. D. P.: Atomic weights of the elements, Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem., 75, 683–900, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375060683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1351/pac200375060683</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Derda, M., Grzegorz Chmielewski, A., and Janusz, L.: Sulphur isotope compositions of components of coal and S-isotope fractionation during its combustion and flue gas desulphurization, Isot. Environ. Health Stud., 43, 57–63, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010601153827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10256010601153827</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ding, S., Chen, Y., Li, Q., and Li, X.-D.: Using Stable Sulfur Isotope to Trace Sulfur Oxidation Pathways during the Winter of 2017–2019 in Tianjin, North China, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 10966, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710966" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/ijerph191710966</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Ding, T., Valkiers, S., Kipphardt, H., De Bièvre, P., Taylor, P. D. P., Gonfiantini, R., and Krouse, R.: Calibrated sulfur isotope abundance ratios of three IAEA sulfur isotope reference materials and V-CDT with a reassessment of the atomic weight of sulfur, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 65, 2433–2437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00611-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00611-1</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ding, X., Li, Q., Wu, D., Wang, X., Li, M., Wang, T., Wang, L., and Chen, J.: Direct observation of sulfate explosive growth in wet plumes emitted from typical coal‐fired stationary sources, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL092071</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Fan, M.-Y., Zhang, Y.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Li, J., Cheng, H., An, N., Sun, Y., Qiu, Y., Cao, F., and Fu, P.: Roles of sulfur oxidation pathways in the variability in stable sulfur isotopic composition of sulfate aerosols at an urban site in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett, 7, 883–888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00623" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00623</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Fang, H. and Michalski, G.: Assessing the roles emission sources and atmospheric processes play in simulating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of atmospheric NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using CMAQ (version 5.2.1) and SMOKE (version 4.6), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4239–4258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4239-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-4239-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Feng, X., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Du, H., Mu, Y., and Chen, J.: Exploring the influence of <sup>34</sup>S fractionation from emission sources and SO<sub>2</sub> atmospheric oxidation on sulfate source apportionment based on hourly resolution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S‐SO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2023JD038595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JD038595</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup>–Ca<sup>2+</sup>–Mg<sup>2+</sup>–NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Na<sup>+</sup>–SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Cl<sup>−</sup>–H<sub>2</sub>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gromov, S., Jöckel, P., Sander, R., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: A kinetic chemistry tagging technique and its application to modelling the stable isotopic composition of atmospheric trace gases, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 337–364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-337-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-337-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Guan, Z. X. and Liu, Y.: How to estimate isotope fractionations of a Rayleigh-like but diffusion-limited disequilibrium process?, Acta Geochimica, 42, 24–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-022-00587-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11631-022-00587-2</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Guo, Z., Shi, L., Chen, S., Jiang, W., Wei, Y., Rui, M., and Zeng, G.: Sulfur isotopic fractionation and source appointment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Nanjing region around the second session of the Youth Olympic Games, Atmos. Res., 174–175, 9–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.01.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.01.011</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Han, X., Guo, Q., Liu, C., Fu, P., Strauss, H., Yang, J., Hu, J., Wei, L., Ren, H., and Peters, M.: Using stable isotopes to trace sources and formation processes of sulfate aerosols from Beijing, China, Sci. Rep., 6, 29958, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep29958</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Han, X., Guo, Q., Liu, C., Strauss, H., Yang, J., Hu, J., Wei, R., Tian, L., Kong, J., and Peters, M.: Effect of the pollution control measures on PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the 2015 China Victory Day Parade: Implication from water-soluble ions and sulfur isotope, Environ. Pollut., 218, 230–241, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.038</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Han, X., Guo, Q., Strauss, H., Liu, C., Hu, J., Guo, Z., Wei, R., Peters, M., Tian, L., and Kong, J.: Multiple sulfur isotope constraints on sources and formation processes of sulfate in Beijing PM<sub>2.5</sub> aerosol, ES&amp;T, 51, 7794–7803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b00280</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Han, X., Lang, Y., Guo, Q., Li, X., Ding, H., and Li, S.: Enhanced Oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> During Haze Events: Constraints From Sulfur Isotopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036960, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036960" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD036960</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., Crowley, J. N., Ono, S., and Foley, S.: Sulfur isotope fractionation during oxidation of sulfur dioxide: gas-phase oxidation by OH radicals and aqueous oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub> and iron catalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 407–423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-407-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-407-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Harris, E., Sinha, B., Foley, S., Crowley, J. N., Borrmann, S., and Hoppe, P.: Sulfur isotope fractionation during heterogeneous oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> on mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4867–4884, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4867-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4867-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., Foley, S., and Borrmann, S.: Fractionation of sulfur isotopes during heterogeneous oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> on sea salt aerosol: a new tool to investigate non-sea salt sulfate production in the marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4619–4631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4619-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4619-2012</ext-link>, 2012c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., and Ono, S.: High-Precision Measurements of <sup>33</sup>S and <sup>34</sup>S Fractionation during SO<sub>2</sub> Oxidation Reveal Causes of Seasonality in SO<sub>2</sub> and Sulfate Isotopic Composition, ES&amp;T, 47, 12174–12183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402824c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es402824c</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation> Hoefs, J.: Stable isotope geochemistry, 8th, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 389 pp., ISBN 9783319197159, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hoefs, J. and Harmon, R.: The Earth's atmosphere–A stable isotope perspective and review, Appl. Geochem., 143, 105355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105355" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105355</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hong, Y., Zhang, H., and Zhu, Y.: Sulfur isotopic characteristics of coal in China and sulfur isotopic fractionation during coal-burning process, Chin. J. Geochem., 12, 51–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02869045</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Itahashi, S., Hattori, S., Ito, A., Sadanaga, Y., Yoshida, N., and Matsuki, A.: Role of Dust and Iron Solubility in Sulfate Formation during the Long-Range Transport in East Asia Evidenced by <sup>17</sup>O-Excess Signatures, ES&amp;T, 56, 13634–13643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03574" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.2c03574</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Du, H., Yang, W., Sun, Y., Hu, B., Li, J., Wang, W., and Wang, T.: Radiative and heterogeneous chemical effects of aerosols on ozone and inorganic aerosols over East Asia, Sci. Total Environ., 622, 1327–1342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y.-C., Yu, M., Xie, F., and Zhang, Y.: Anthropogenic emission sources of sulfate aerosols in Hangzhou, East China: insights from isotope techniques with consideration of fractionation effects between gas-to-particle transformations, ES&amp;T, 56, 3905–3914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05823" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c05823</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Liu, T. and Abbatt, J. P.: Oxidation of sulfur dioxide by nitrogen dioxide accelerated at the interface of deliquesced aerosol particles, Nat. Chem., 13, 1173–1177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X.: Progress of desulfurization and denitration technology of flue gas in China, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 242, 042010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/242/4/042010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1755-1315/242/4/042010</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Mariotti, A., Germon, J., Hubert, P., Kaiser, P., Letolle, R., Tardieux, A., and Tardieux, P.: Experimental determination of nitrogen kinetic isotope fractionation: some principles; illustration for the denitrification and nitrification processes, Plant Soil, 62, 413–430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02374138</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Oduro, H., Van Alstyne, K. L., and Farquhar, J.: Sulfur isotope variability of oceanic DMSP generation and its contributions to marine biogenic sulfur emissions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 9012–9016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117691109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1117691109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation> Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, Third, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 1120 pp., ISBN 9781118947402, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Shao, J., Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Lu, X., He, P., Sun, Y., Shah, V., Martin, R. V., Philip, S., Song, S., Zhao, Y., Xie, Z., Zhang, L., and Alexander, B.: Heterogeneous sulfate aerosol formation mechanisms during wintertime Chinese haze events: air quality model assessment using observations of sulfate oxygen isotopes in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6107–6123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6107-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6107-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Song, S., Gao, M., Xu, W., Shao, J., Shi, G., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Sun, Y., and McElroy, M. B.: Fine-particle pH for Beijing winter haze as inferred from different thermodynamic equilibrium models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7423–7438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7423-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7423-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Song, Z., Sun, R., and Zhang, Y.: Modeling mercury isotopic fractionation in the atmosphere, Environ. Pollut., 307, 119588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119588</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Stockwell, W. R., Kirchner, F., Kuhn, M., and Seefeld, S.: A new mechanism for regional atmospheric chemistry modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 25847–25879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00849" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00849</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Sun, X., Jiang, H., and Bao, H.: Triple oxygen isotope composition of combustion sulfate, Atmos. Environ., 314, 120095, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120095</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Van Breukelen, B. M.: Extending the Rayleigh equation to allow competing isotope fractionating pathways to improve quantification of biodegradation, ES&amp;T, 41, 4004–4010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0628452" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0628452</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Zamora, M. L., Hu, M., Lin, Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., and Meng, J.: Persistent sulfate formation from London Fog to Chinese haze, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616540113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Liu, M., Wang, T., Song, Y., Zhou, L., Cao, J., Hu, J., Tang, G., Chen, Z., Li, Z., Xu, Z., Peng, C., Lian, C., Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Li, W., Zhu, T., Tian, H., and Ge, M.: Sulfate formation is dominated by manganese-catalyzed oxidation of SO2 on aerosol surfaces during haze events, Nat. Commun., 12, 1993–1993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22091-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-021-22091-6</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Maeda, T., Hayashi, M., Hsiao, L.-F., and Liu, K.-Y.: A nested air quality prediction modeling system for urban and regional scales: Application for high-ozone episode in Taiwan, Water Air Soil Pollut., 130, 391–396, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013833217916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1013833217916</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wei, L.: The dataset of compiled observed and simulated sulfur isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S_SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) across Eastern China's cities, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14357423" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14357423</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Wei, L.: Isotopic Chemistry Module Developed and Coupled with NAQPMS Model, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14724954" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14724954</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Wei, L., Yue, S., Zhao, W., Yang, W., Zhang, Y., Ren, L., Han, X., Guo, Q., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., and Fu, P.: Stable sulfur isotope ratios and chemical compositions of fine aerosols (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 633, 1156–1164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.153</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Wei, Y., Chen, X., Chen, H., Li, J., Wang, Z., Yang, W., Ge, B., Du, H., Hao, J., Wang, W., Li, J., Sun, Y., and Huang, H.: IAP-AACM v1.0: a global to regional evaluation of the atmospheric chemistry model in CAS-ESM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8269–8296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8269-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8269-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Yang, D. A., Bardoux, G., Assayag, N., Laskar, C., Widory, D., and Cartigny, P.: Atmospheric SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation by NO<sub>2</sub> plays no role in the mass independent sulfur isotope fractionation of urban aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 193, 109–117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.007</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Yang, W., Li, J., Wang, W., Li, J., Ge, M., Sun, Y., Chen, X., Ge, B., Tong, S., and Wang, Q.: Investigating secondary organic aerosol formation pathways in China during 2014, Atmos. Environ., 213, 133–147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.057</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A. and Peters, L. K.: A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 30387–30415, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900876" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900876</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z., Wang, W., Cheng, M., Liu, S., Xu, J., He, Y., and Meng, F.: The contribution of residential coal combustion to PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution over China's Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in winter, Atmos. Environ., 159, 147–161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.054</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, M., Song, D., Zhang, D., and Zhao, Z.: Variability of sulfur and oxygen isotope values within wet precipitation and its correlation with diminished anthropogenic sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) emission, Atmos. Environ., 317, 120185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120185</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Advancing isotope-enabled model for comprehensive understanding of atmospheric sulfur isotope effects: demonstrating the overlooked isotopic fractionation during combustion and flue gas desulfurization</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Gong, S.: Transition metal-catalyzed oxidation of atmospheric sulfur: Global implications for the sulfur budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D010486, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010486</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berglen, T. F., Berntsen, T. K., Isaksen, I. S., and Sundet, J. K.: A global model of the coupled sulfur/oxidant chemistry in the troposphere: The sulfur cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D003948, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003948</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, H. S., Wang, Z. F., Li, J., Tang, X., Ge, B. Z., Wu, X. L., Wild, O., and Carmichael, G. R.: GNAQPMS-Hg v1.0, a global nested atmospheric mercury transport model: model description, evaluation and application to trans-boundary transport of Chinese anthropogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2857–2876, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2857-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2857-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, S. L., Guo, Z. Y., Guo, Z. B., Guo, Q. J., Zhang, Y. L., Zhu, B., and Zhang, H. X.: Sulfur isotopic fractionation and its implication: Sulfate formation in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and coal combustion under different conditions, Atmos. Res., 194, 142–149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.04.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.04.034</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, X., Wang, Z., Li, J., and Yu, F.: Development of a regional chemical transport model with size-resolved aerosol microphysics and its application on aerosol number concentration simulation over China, SOLA, 10, 83–87, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2014-017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2014-017</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, X., Yang, W., Wang, Z., Li, J., Hu, M., An, J., Wu, Q., Wang, Z., Chen, H., and Wei, Y.: Improving new particle formation simulation by coupling a volatility-basis set (VBS) organic aerosol module in NAQPMS+ APM, Atmos. Environ., 204, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.053</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, X., Yu, F., Yang, W., Sun, Y., Chen, H., Du, W., Zhao, J., Wei, Y., Wei, L., Du, H., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Li, J., An, J., and Wang, Z.: Global–regional nested simulation of particle number concentration by combing microphysical processes with an evolving organic aerosol module, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9343–9366, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9343-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9343-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Y., Zheng, G., Wei, C., Mu, Q., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Gao, M., Zhang, Q., He, K., and Carmichael, G.: Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China, Sci. Adv., 2, e1601530, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Butler, T., Keating, T., Wu, R., Kaminski, J., Kuenen, J., Kurokawa, J., Chatani, S., Morikawa, T., Pouliot, G., Racine, J., Moran, M. D., Klimont, Z., Manseau, P. M., Mashayekhi, R., Henderson, B. H., Smith, S. J., Suchyta, H., Muntean, M., Solazzo, E., Banja, M., Schaaf, E., Pagani, F., Woo, J.-H., Kim, J., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Pisoni, E., Zhang, J., Niemi, D., Sassi, M., Ansari, T., and Foley, K.: The HTAP_v3 emission mosaic: merging regional and global monthly emissions (2000–2018) to support air quality modelling and policies, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2667–2694, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Laeter, J. R., Böhlke, J. K., De Bièvre, P., Hidaka, H., Peiser, H. S., Rosman, K. J. R., and Taylor, P. D. P.: Atomic weights of the elements, Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem., 75, 683–900, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375060683" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375060683</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Derda, M., Grzegorz Chmielewski, A., and Janusz, L.: Sulphur isotope compositions of components of coal and S-isotope fractionation during its combustion and flue gas desulphurization, Isot. Environ. Health Stud., 43, 57–63, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010601153827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010601153827</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, S., Chen, Y., Li, Q., and Li, X.-D.: Using Stable Sulfur Isotope to Trace Sulfur Oxidation Pathways during the Winter of 2017–2019 in Tianjin, North China, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 10966, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710966" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710966</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, T., Valkiers, S., Kipphardt, H., De Bièvre, P., Taylor, P. D. P., Gonfiantini, R., and Krouse, R.: Calibrated sulfur isotope abundance ratios of three IAEA sulfur isotope reference materials and V-CDT with a reassessment of the atomic weight of sulfur, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 65, 2433–2437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00611-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00611-1</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, X., Li, Q., Wu, D., Wang, X., Li, M., Wang, T., Wang, L., and Chen, J.: Direct observation of sulfate explosive growth in wet plumes emitted from typical coal‐fired stationary sources, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092071, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092071</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fan, M.-Y., Zhang, Y.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Li, J., Cheng, H., An, N., Sun, Y., Qiu, Y., Cao, F., and Fu, P.: Roles of sulfur oxidation pathways in the variability in stable sulfur isotopic composition of sulfate aerosols at an urban site in Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett, 7, 883–888, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00623" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00623</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fang, H. and Michalski, G.: Assessing the roles emission sources and atmospheric processes play in simulating <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N of atmospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> using CMAQ (version 5.2.1) and SMOKE (version 4.6), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4239–4258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4239-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4239-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, X., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Du, H., Mu, Y., and Chen, J.: Exploring the influence of <sup>34</sup>S fractionation from emission sources and SO<sub>2</sub> atmospheric oxidation on sulfate source apportionment based on hourly resolution <i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S‐SO<sub>2</sub>&thinsp;∕&thinsp;SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2023JD038595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038595</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup>–Ca<sup>2+</sup>–Mg<sup>2+</sup>–NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–Na<sup>+</sup>–SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>–NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–Cl<sup>−</sup>–H<sub>2</sub>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gromov, S., Jöckel, P., Sander, R., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: A kinetic chemistry tagging technique and its application to modelling the stable isotopic composition of atmospheric trace gases, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 337–364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-337-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-337-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guan, Z. X. and Liu, Y.: How to estimate isotope fractionations of a Rayleigh-like but diffusion-limited disequilibrium process?, Acta Geochimica, 42, 24–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-022-00587-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-022-00587-2</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, Z., Shi, L., Chen, S., Jiang, W., Wei, Y., Rui, M., and Zeng, G.: Sulfur isotopic fractionation and source appointment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Nanjing region around the second session of the Youth Olympic Games, Atmos. Res., 174–175, 9–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.01.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.01.011</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, X., Guo, Q., Liu, C., Fu, P., Strauss, H., Yang, J., Hu, J., Wei, L., Ren, H., and Peters, M.: Using stable isotopes to trace sources and formation processes of sulfate aerosols from Beijing, China, Sci. Rep., 6, 29958, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29958</a>, 2016a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, X., Guo, Q., Liu, C., Strauss, H., Yang, J., Hu, J., Wei, R., Tian, L., Kong, J., and Peters, M.: Effect of the pollution control measures on PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the 2015 China Victory Day Parade: Implication from water-soluble ions and sulfur isotope, Environ. Pollut., 218, 230–241, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.038</a>, 2016b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, X., Guo, Q., Strauss, H., Liu, C., Hu, J., Guo, Z., Wei, R., Peters, M., Tian, L., and Kong, J.: Multiple sulfur isotope constraints on sources and formation processes of sulfate in Beijing PM<sub>2.5</sub> aerosol, ES&amp;T, 51, 7794–7803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00280" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00280</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, X., Lang, Y., Guo, Q., Li, X., Ding, H., and Li, S.: Enhanced Oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> During Haze Events: Constraints From Sulfur Isotopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036960, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036960" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036960</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., Crowley, J. N., Ono, S., and Foley, S.: Sulfur isotope fractionation during oxidation of sulfur dioxide: gas-phase oxidation by OH radicals and aqueous oxidation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub> and iron catalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 407–423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-407-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-407-2012</a>, 2012a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harris, E., Sinha, B., Foley, S., Crowley, J. N., Borrmann, S., and Hoppe, P.: Sulfur isotope fractionation during heterogeneous oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> on mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4867–4884, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4867-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4867-2012</a>, 2012b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., Foley, S., and Borrmann, S.: Fractionation of sulfur isotopes during heterogeneous oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> on sea salt aerosol: a new tool to investigate non-sea salt sulfate production in the marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4619–4631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4619-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4619-2012</a>, 2012c.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harris, E., Sinha, B., Hoppe, P., and Ono, S.: High-Precision Measurements of <sup>33</sup>S and <sup>34</sup>S Fractionation during SO<sub>2</sub> Oxidation Reveal Causes of Seasonality in SO<sub>2</sub> and Sulfate Isotopic Composition, ES&amp;T, 47, 12174–12183, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402824c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es402824c</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoefs, J.: Stable isotope geochemistry, 8th, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 389 pp., ISBN 9783319197159, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoefs, J. and Harmon, R.: The Earth's atmosphere–A stable isotope perspective and review, Appl. Geochem., 143, 105355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105355" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105355</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hong, Y., Zhang, H., and Zhu, Y.: Sulfur isotopic characteristics of coal in China and sulfur isotopic fractionation during coal-burning process, Chin. J. Geochem., 12, 51–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869045</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Itahashi, S., Hattori, S., Ito, A., Sadanaga, Y., Yoshida, N., and Matsuki, A.: Role of Dust and Iron Solubility in Sulfate Formation during the Long-Range Transport in East Asia Evidenced by <sup>17</sup>O-Excess Signatures, ES&amp;T, 56, 13634–13643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03574" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03574</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Du, H., Yang, W., Sun, Y., Hu, B., Li, J., Wang, W., and Wang, T.: Radiative and heterogeneous chemical effects of aerosols on ozone and inorganic aerosols over East Asia, Sci. Total Environ., 622, 1327–1342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, Y.-C., Yu, M., Xie, F., and Zhang, Y.: Anthropogenic emission sources of sulfate aerosols in Hangzhou, East China: insights from isotope techniques with consideration of fractionation effects between gas-to-particle transformations, ES&amp;T, 56, 3905–3914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05823" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05823</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, T. and Abbatt, J. P.: Oxidation of sulfur dioxide by nitrogen dioxide accelerated at the interface of deliquesced aerosol particles, Nat. Chem., 13, 1173–1177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X.: Progress of desulfurization and denitration technology of flue gas in China, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 242, 042010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/242/4/042010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/242/4/042010</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mariotti, A., Germon, J., Hubert, P., Kaiser, P., Letolle, R., Tardieux, A., and Tardieux, P.: Experimental determination of nitrogen kinetic isotope fractionation: some principles; illustration for the denitrification and nitrification processes, Plant Soil, 62, 413–430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374138</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oduro, H., Van Alstyne, K. L., and Farquhar, J.: Sulfur isotope variability of oceanic DMSP generation and its contributions to marine biogenic sulfur emissions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 9012–9016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117691109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117691109</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, Third, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 1120 pp., ISBN 9781118947402, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shao, J., Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Lu, X., He, P., Sun, Y., Shah, V., Martin, R. V., Philip, S., Song, S., Zhao, Y., Xie, Z., Zhang, L., and Alexander, B.: Heterogeneous sulfate aerosol formation mechanisms during wintertime Chinese haze events: air quality model assessment using observations of sulfate oxygen isotopes in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6107–6123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6107-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6107-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, S., Gao, M., Xu, W., Shao, J., Shi, G., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Sun, Y., and McElroy, M. B.: Fine-particle pH for Beijing winter haze as inferred from different thermodynamic equilibrium models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7423–7438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7423-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7423-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, Z., Sun, R., and Zhang, Y.: Modeling mercury isotopic fractionation in the atmosphere, Environ. Pollut., 307, 119588, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119588" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119588</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stockwell, W. R., Kirchner, F., Kuhn, M., and Seefeld, S.: A new mechanism for regional atmospheric chemistry modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 25847–25879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00849" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00849</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, X., Jiang, H., and Bao, H.: Triple oxygen isotope composition of combustion sulfate, Atmos. Environ., 314, 120095, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120095</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Breukelen, B. M.: Extending the Rayleigh equation to allow competing isotope fractionating pathways to improve quantification of biodegradation, ES&amp;T, 41, 4004–4010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0628452" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0628452</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Zamora, M. L., Hu, M., Lin, Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., and Meng, J.: Persistent sulfate formation from London Fog to Chinese haze, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, W., Liu, M., Wang, T., Song, Y., Zhou, L., Cao, J., Hu, J., Tang, G., Chen, Z., Li, Z., Xu, Z., Peng, C., Lian, C., Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Li, W., Zhu, T., Tian, H., and Ge, M.: Sulfate formation is dominated by manganese-catalyzed oxidation of SO2 on aerosol surfaces during haze events, Nat. Commun., 12, 1993–1993, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22091-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22091-6</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Z., Maeda, T., Hayashi, M., Hsiao, L.-F., and Liu, K.-Y.: A nested air quality prediction modeling system for urban and regional scales: Application for high-ozone episode in Taiwan, Water Air Soil Pollut., 130, 391–396, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013833217916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013833217916</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, L.: The dataset of compiled observed and simulated sulfur isotopic composition (<i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S_SO<sub>2</sub>, <i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S_SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>) across Eastern China's cities, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14357423" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14357423</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, L.: Isotopic Chemistry Module Developed and Coupled with NAQPMS Model, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14724954" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14724954</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, L., Yue, S., Zhao, W., Yang, W., Zhang, Y., Ren, L., Han, X., Guo, Q., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., and Fu, P.: Stable sulfur isotope ratios and chemical compositions of fine aerosols (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in Beijing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 633, 1156–1164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.153</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, Y., Chen, X., Chen, H., Li, J., Wang, Z., Yang, W., Ge, B., Du, H., Hao, J., Wang, W., Li, J., Sun, Y., and Huang, H.: IAP-AACM v1.0: a global to regional evaluation of the atmospheric chemistry model in CAS-ESM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8269–8296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8269-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8269-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, D. A., Bardoux, G., Assayag, N., Laskar, C., Widory, D., and Cartigny, P.: Atmospheric SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation by NO<sub>2</sub> plays no role in the mass independent sulfur isotope fractionation of urban aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 193, 109–117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.007</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, W., Li, J., Wang, W., Li, J., Ge, M., Sun, Y., Chen, X., Ge, B., Tong, S., and Wang, Q.: Investigating secondary organic aerosol formation pathways in China during 2014, Atmos. Environ., 213, 133–147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.057</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaveri, R. A. and Peters, L. K.: A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 30387–30415, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900876" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900876</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Z., Wang, W., Cheng, M., Liu, S., Xu, J., He, Y., and Meng, F.: The contribution of residential coal combustion to PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution over China's Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in winter, Atmos. Environ., 159, 147–161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.054</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, M., Song, D., Zhang, D., and Zhao, Z.: Variability of sulfur and oxygen isotope values within wet precipitation and its correlation with diminished anthropogenic sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) emission, Atmos. Environ., 317, 120185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120185</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
