<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-11235-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Fractal characteristics of ice-supersaturated regions in the tropopause region of the northern midlatitudes</article-title><alt-title>Fractal characteristics of ISSRs</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schuh</surname><given-names>Helena Zoe</given-names></name>
          <email>hschuh01@students.uni-mainz.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2443-8073</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Reutter</surname><given-names>Philipp</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8932-6565</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Niebler</surname><given-names>Stefan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Spichtinger</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4008-4977</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Computer Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Helena Zoe Schuh (hschuh01@students.uni-mainz.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>11235</fpage><lpage>11253</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>May</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Helena Zoe Schuh et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e116">Ice supersaturated regions (ISSRs) are air masses in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) where saturation ratio over ice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) exceeds one, i.e. regions with enhanced water vapor concentrations. These  are potential  formation regions of cirrus clouds and contrails. While the impact of cloud free regions of enhanced water vapor on the planetary radiation balance is small to negligible,  thin cirrus clouds and aircraft induced contrail cirrus formed within them might have a large radiative impact. Understanding the characteristics of ISSRs, including their geometry and seasonal variability, is essential for evaluating atmospheric models in representing ice clouds correctly. While ISSR's pathlength statistics, i.e. 1D characteristics, have already been studied, their geometric properties, particularly fractal properties such as self-similarity, and their seasonal variability remain largely unexplored. We identify ISSRs using ERA5 reanalysis data spanning from 2010 to 2020 at three pressure levels. An area-perimeter method is employed to compute fractal dimensions. The results reveal slopes implying fractal dimensions, strongly suggesting that ISSRs in the UTLS exhibit fractal behavior. A seasonal cycle in total number and area of ISSRs, as well as in the fractal dimension is found, in combination with a strong vertical variation. We hypothesize that this is caused by the seasonal variation of convective and frontal activity. We further analyzed the zonal and meridional extents of ISSRs as well as the pathlengths of modeled flights along commercial flight routes. The results of these horizontal extents are consistent with the fractal properties, and suggest distinct formation processes for ISSRs.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding-source>
<award-id>DFG TRR301 TPChange, Project-ID 428312742</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung</funding-source>
<award-id>P2018-02-003</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e139">Ice supersaturated regions (ISSRs) in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) serve as key environments for the formation and persistence of in situ cirrus clouds. These regions occur when the water vapor partial pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeds the water vapor saturation pressure over ice at temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to a saturation ratio

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M4" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">si</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        greater than one. Ice supersaturation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">first described by Alfred</named-content></xref> is a frequent and widespread phenomenon in the UTLS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.2"/>, where the cold and dry conditions render even small variations in humidity highly significant. ISSRs not only serve as a key environment for the formation of in situ cirrus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.3"/>, but also as a prerequisite for persistent contrails <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.4"/>. Currently, this is a major topic in the context of contrail avoidance, since contrails can persist for over 10 h and spread into contrail cirrus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.5"/>. Cloud free ISSRs have a relatively minor direct influence on the local radiation budget, but their transition into cirrus clouds significantly alters radiative forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.6"/>. ISSRs and cirrus clouds are predominantly found in the upper troposphere, but they can also extend above the tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.7"/>, affecting the lower stratosphere (LS). The upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) region is characterized by extremely cold and dry air masses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.8"/>. Outgoing longwave radiation is particularly sensitive to small relative perturbations in UTLS water vapor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.9"/>. Gradients in saturation ratio are closely related to the respective changes in longwave radiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, potentially resulting into local changes of the thermodynamic structure of the tropopause region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.11"/>. Consequently, variations in ISSR occurrence and cirrus cloud formation within this region have important implications for climate dynamics and radiative balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.12"/>. ISSRs are not necessarily cloud free air masses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.13"/>, despite former investigations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.14"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> suggesting this property. The transition from ice clouds to cloud free air is very smooth and usually there are no sharp boundaries. In our study we will not further distinguish between clear and cloudy air, as we are interested in the thermodynamic state of the air masses. While studies have examined the horizontal extent of ISSRs using pathlength statistics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.15"/>, their two-dimensional spatial characteristics, including shape and scaling behavior, remain poorly understood and have not been studied in detail yet. Statistical investigations are challenging because of the ISSRs' variability in size and shape. In addition, some metrics must be defined (or even developed) for studying ISSRs as 2D/3D objects, instead of just using point measurements. The radiative effects of cirrus clouds, related to either natural or anthropogenic origins, are a subject of ongoing research. This study emphasizes the structural and statistical properties of ISSRs. Understanding their morphology and variability is essential for improving microphysical parameterizations and interpreting the atmospheric processes that control cloud evolution in the UTLS.</p>
      <p id="d2e247">A potential approach in studying the geometric properties of 2D or 3D objects is to examine their potential self-similarity, i.e. the fractal properties of these macroscopic objects. In general, fractals are geometric structures characterized by self-similarity. These objects exhibit similar patterns on different scales. They differ from traditional Euclidean shapes by possessing non-integer (fractional) dimensions that describe the way their complexity changes with scale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.16"/>. The research field of fractal geometry was defined by Mandelbrot in 1975, and became prominent in the 1980s <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.17"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Investigations on the fractal nature of natural objects were made before Mandelbrot. Notably, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.18"/> carried out first investigations on the nature of turbulence, already addressing fractal properties. Thus, fractal analysis has a longstanding tradition in atmospheric physics, especially in cloud physics. In numerous previous studies, the fractal nature of clouds is investigated, ranging from cumulus cloud statistics and properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.19"/>, rain and hail clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.20"/>, tropical clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.21"/>, noctilucent clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.22"/>, and cloud fields in high resolution models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.23"/>. Additionally, fractal analysis is a key technique for turbulence theories and data evaluation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In some studies, clouds and turbulence investigations are combined in order to explain fractal properties of clouds by the underlying turbulence (or diffusion) characteristics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.25"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Overall, there is strong evidence that clouds at different vertical levels show fractal behavior. Thus, it is  reasonable to question whether their potential formation regions, i.e. the ISSRs for ice clouds, exhibit similar properties. If this holds true and ISSRs also display self-similar characteristics, determining their fractal dimension can provide insight into their spatial attributes and characteristics.</p>
      <p id="d2e287">To identify and study ISSRs, we analyze ERA5 reanalysis data that incorporates absolute humidity, temperature and pressure. Working with a simplified binary representation of ISSRs, connected areas are identified and their areas and perimeters are calculated. To assess the  fractal characteristics, especially the self-similarity of ISSRs, we examine the area-perimeter relation. This relation and variations of it have been used in many investigations of clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.26"/>. Such an analysis provides a quantitative measure of the macroscopic structures and has important implications for further investigations.</p>
      <p id="d2e293">The study is structured as follows: In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> the data set and the methods are introduced. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> the fractal characteristics of ISSRs as found in the data are investigated. This is followed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> by the investigation on the horizontal extent of ISSRs. The results are discussed and conclusions are drawn in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>. Additional results are presented in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and Methods</title>
      <p id="d2e312">In this section we present the data set and describe the methods used for the investigation of the data.</p>
      <p id="d2e315">ISSRs are naturally occurring physical phenomena whose boundaries are inherently gradual rather than sharply defined. Their identification using gridded reanalysis fields necessarily imposes discrete representations of these continuous structures. Although these representations are not identical to the physical structures in nature, they provide a consistent basis for quantifying the geometry and occurrence of physically meaningful supersaturated regions.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Data set ERA5</title>
      <p id="d2e326">The study analyzes eleven years of ERA5 reanalysis data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.27"/> covering the period from 1 January 2010, to 31 December 2020. Data is available at the standard synoptic times each day (00:00, 06:00, 12:00, 18:00 UTC), resulting in a total of 16 060 datasets for analysis. ERA5 provides data with a horizontal resolution of 0.25° in longitude and latitude, and a vertical resolution of 137 model levels with an approximate resolution in the tropopause region of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The data set contains variables of 3D winds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and specific humidity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the investigation we distinguish water vapor in air masses in the state of sub or super saturation with respect to ice. The geographical area used for the analysis is narrowed down to range from 80 to 30° latitude in the Northern Hemisphere in order to exclude the tropics and polar regions. In our investigation we focus on pressure levels of 200, 250, and 300 hPa, representing the upper troposphere and tropopause region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">similarly to the investigation by</named-content></xref>. The data on adjacent model levels were interpolated on the respective isobaric surfaces.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d2e389">Here, we briefly describe the processing of the data; for details we refer to Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Relevant variable</title>
      <p id="d2e401">The thermodynamic order parameter for ISSRs is the saturation ratio

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M9" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">si</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">si</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            as calculated from the ERA5 variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, using the ratio of molar masses of water and air, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the saturation vapour pressure over (hexagonal) ice <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">si</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the formulation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.29"/>, i.e.,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M15" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">si</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5504</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5723.265</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.53068</mml:mn><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00728332</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="2.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given in Kelvin and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">si</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained in Pascal. The formulation is valid for temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The thermodynamic equilibrium between vapor and  ice is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e634">ERA5 data underestimates the humidity in the UTLS region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.30"/>. We counteract this by choosing a threshold value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">threshold</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that we use no further information about possible clouds inside the ISSRs. A data point is assigned to be supersaturated (i.e.  belonging to an ISSR) if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">threshold</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using this criterion we create a two dimensional binary field with subsaturated data points (index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) and data points inside an ISSR (index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1) for each pressure level. For a macroscopic object we have to specify a measure for the connectivity of single data points (with index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1) on the gridded isobaric surface. We choose the 8-neighborhood (or Moore neighborhood), i.e. a central pixel is connected to the neighboring pixels via the edges and the diagonals. This definition, originating from investigations with cellular automaton <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.31"/>, is essential, since the connectivity of a physical object should not (or as little as possible) depend on the orientation of a grid. A visualization of different neighborhoods is represented in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>. For a substantial analysis, we consider only ISSRs consisting of at least <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixels, i.e. exceeding a  minimum size. Otherwise, a possible self-similar structure would not be reliably resolved. Here, we follow the recommendation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.32"/>. Furthermore, we focus on the midlatitudes in the Northern Hemisphere (30–80° N). As ISSRs may extend into polar or tropical regions, we exclude those objects crossing the boundaries of 30 and 80° N completely (setting the index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) to avoid artificially smoothing perimeter and cropping area. For the further evaluation, the resulting connected binary islands (i.e. the ISSRs) are numbered.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Measuring Island Area and Perimeter</title>
      <p id="d2e744">The ISSRs are located on the geographical grid of the Earth. Since we use a latitude-longitude description we have to take into account the distortion caused by the curvature of the Earth. Each grid point can be seen as the center of an almost quadratic pixel with a respective area (in square meters, see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>), which can be assigned by using the Python package <monospace>pyproj.Geod</monospace> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.33"/>. For the calculation of the perimeter, we had to develop an additional tool, taking into account the length of the respective boundaries of the pixel without a neighboring pixel. The overall perimeter of the labeled island is calculated iteratively; here, we can determine both internal and external borders.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Calculation of the Fractal Dimension</title>
      <p id="d2e763">A key characteristic of fractals is self-similarity, the defining property upon which we base our approach for the dimension of objects. The fractal dimension most commonly refers to the Hausdorff dimension. However, its rigorous determination lies beyond the scope of this work. As the general concept involves progressively increasing the spatial resolution of the data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.34"/>, this procedure is not feasible for real-world data due to the finite resolution. Specifically, gridded data sets such as ERA5 are incompatible with this method, as the resolution is fixed and cannot be refined arbitrarily.</p>
      <p id="d2e769">Consequently, a different method must be employed to calculate the dimension for data in two dimensions. For this purpose, the area-perimeter relation is investigated. This type of relationship was introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.35"/> to study fractal properties of clouds and rain areas, i.e. the self-similarity of such objects. It is defined as a power law relationship between the perimeter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of a two dimensional object is assumed, such that

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M29" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>⟺</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> a scaling parameter. Using scatter plots of data points <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a double logarithmic scale, the perimeter shows a linear behavior with respect to the area with a slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is not necessarily an integer number but rather a non-negative real number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This can be used for calculating the “fractal” dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For regular geometric objects we obtain a value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see also the discussion in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>). D should be understood as the dimension of the perimeter. For planar, fractal objects like ISSRs on an isobaric surface we assume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be determined by a linear fit with slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e963">As observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.36"/>, the “dimension” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as derived by the area-perimeter relation does not agree with the Hausdorff dimension in general. However, it is appropriate to use this approach in order to study the fractal characteristics and properties of phenomena as shown in other studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.37"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for details see Supplement</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e983">For the ERA5 data in this study (as for all gridded data), the perimeter cannot approach infinity as the horizontal resolution limits the frayed nature of the ISSRs' perimeter, further justifying the employment of the area-perimeter method. The dimension calculated with the area-perimeter method will hereafter be referred to as the fractal dimension. As ISSRs have irregular boundaries, the dimension is expected to be in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/> we exemplarily show how the fractal dimension might change by either changing the shape of rectangulars systematically or fraying the boundary of squares.</p>
      <p id="d2e1005">For gridded data, area and perimeter can only be approximated. Possible errors are underestimation of the area and overestimation of the perimeter, as discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.38"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.39"/>. In Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/> we investigate these issues for spheres. The analysis indicates that the quality of the evaluation is not compromised. The derived fractal dimensions (i.e. exponents in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) can therefore be regarded as robust estimates and are suitable for further, including quantitative, analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Fractal properties of ISSRs</title>
      <p id="d2e1028">In this section we investigate the properties of ISSRs, such as the number and area of ISSRs, and the derived fractal dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Subsequently, their seasonal and annual evolution are investigated.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1040">Monthly ISSR Number count from 2010 to 2020 at pressure levels 200 hPa (orange), 250 hPa (violet) and 300 hPa (dark blue).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>


<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>ISSR Number Count and Area</title>
      <p id="d2e1059">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> shows the number of observed ISSRs by month on the 200, 250 and 300 hPa pressure levels during the period from 2010 to 2020. The total number is a sum of all ISSRs appearing at each point in time. This causes the number to be significantly higher than the ISSRs that appeared in a given month, as ISSRs are counted multiple times when having a life-span longer than 6 h. A clear dependence of the number of ISSRs with altitude is evident. At lower altitudes (i.e. higher pressures) we find significantly more ISSRs than at higher altitudes. This can be explained by the fact that in the extratropics the (thermal) tropopause is located in the pressure range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and ISSRs are almost exclusively located in the troposphere. Only few ISSRs seem to reach into the stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.40"/>. Generally, ISSRs are most frequently located close to the tropopause.</p>
      <p id="d2e1086">The tropopause also shows a seasonal cycle with high altitudes during summer and lower altitudes during winter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Nevertheless, the probability to measure dry and warm air in the stratosphere at a certain pressure level in the extratropics is much higher for pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This might explain the strong differences in the amount of ISSRs between the three pressure levels. The strong seasonal cycle in the number of ISSRs is a prominent feature, which is most pronounced at pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. in the upper troposphere. We find maxima in summer and minima in winter for all 3 pressure levels. The month with the highest observed number at pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is July 2013 with 9511 detected ISSRs, the minimum number of 3290 ISSRs at the same pressure level can be observed in February 2018. Respectively, the highest number of ISSRs at pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was recorded in July 2020 with 3462 ISSRs, whereas the minimum was observed in February 2012 with 954 ISSRs. Here, we see the substantial spread in the amount of ISSRs.</p>
      <p id="d2e1191">The seasonal cycle compares well with former investigations. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.42"/> also found this signature with highest values of ISSR numbers during summer and lowest counts in the winter's season. Furthermore, the strong variation of numbers with the vertical levels agrees well with our findings.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1200">Monthly ISSR total area from 2010 to 2020 at pressure levels of 200 hPa (orange), 250 hPa (violet) and 300 hPa (dark blue).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1209">In addition to the total number of ISSRs we investigate the total area of the detected ISSRs. Analogous the number of ISSRs, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> the total area of observed ISSRs by month on the 200, 250 and 300 hPa pressure levels in the timespan from 2010 to 2020 is shown. As for the evaluation of the total number, the area might be enhanced by counting long-lived ISSRs multiple times. The total area is largest at the lowest altitude (i.e. pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and is decreasing with increasing altitude. The highest  total area in one month was observed in May 2019 with a summed area of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the same pressure level the minimum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is found in February 2018. At the highest altitude level (pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the area is strongly reduced compared to the other two levels, which have comparable area values. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the month with the highest total area of supersaturation in respect to ice is July 2020, summing up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. February 2015 at this pressure level constitutes the absolute minimum observed on all pressure levels with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Like the total number, the area also shows a seasonal cycle. We find maximum values in the summer months, and minimum values in the winter months, similarly to the investigations of the total number of ISSRs. The cycle is most pronounced in the two lower levels (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while for the highest level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the variation is weak but still apparent. In summer, the total area of ISSRs at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is approaching values comparable to (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This comparability only holds for the area maximum in summer, whereas the area decreases more strongly at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1482">Exemplary ISSRs at pressure levels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (top to bottom) at three different times (3 columns) in January 2010. Colors are used to distinguish between individual ISSRs.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1541">Exemplary ISSRs at pressure levels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (top to bottom)  at three different times (3 columns) in July 2019. Colors are used to distinguish between individual ISSRs.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1598">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> examples of ISSRs at the three different pressure levels over the North Atlantic region are presented for three times in January 2010, giving a snapshot. A similar example is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> for one snapshot in July 2019 (3 times). In winter the ISSRs are discernibly more compact and cover  a limited area (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>). At the highest altitudes (i.e. at pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) there are very few ISSRs while at lower altitudes (higher pressures) more ISSRs can be seen. In winter the tropopause is located at lower altitudes, thus the pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is (most likely) completely contained in the stratosphere. In contrast, in July we find widespread and frayed ISSRs at all three pressure levels (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). Even at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ISSRs can be found, since during summer the tropopause is located at higher altitudes and ice supersaturation is present there.</p>
      <p id="d2e1659">To gain a better understanding of the correlation between ISSR count and area in relation to seasons, we calculated the mean ISSR area from the corresponding number and area statistics. The results are shown as timeseries in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1666">Averaged area as calculated from the number and areas of ISSRs, determinated in the evaluation in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1677">We see a pronounced seasonal cycle in the mean area of ISSRs with a very distinct maximum in winter (mean values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a clear minimum in summer (mean values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Assuming a purely spherical shape, this would translate into a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> for the radii. This behavior hints at two different formation mechanisms dominating in summer and winter respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e1762">While the average area per ISSR on the 200 and 300 hPa levels show good agreement across all seasons, this ratio is noticeably larger at 250 hPa during summer. This feature does not represent an outlier but can be explained by jointly considering the number count and total area. In winter, both the number count and total area at 250 hPa are substantially lower than at 300 hPa. During summer, the total area at both levels is comparable, despite a lower number count at 250 hPa. Consequently, the ratio of total area to number count is increased at 250 hPa in summer. The underlying cause of this feature is the 250 hPa level being recurrently located within both the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere depending on the season. In contrast, 200 hPa remains predominantly above and 300 hPa predominantly below the tropopause throughout the year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.43"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1768">The different shape of ISSRs in winter and summer, as observed in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, can also be seen in the (statistical) investigations of the fractal dimension, as described in the next section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>ISSR Dimension</title>
      <p id="d2e1783">The fractal dimensions for all ISSRs in the data set are derived using the methods explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/> and Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>. We calculate area and perimeter for each detected ISSR (i.e. each connected “island”) and determine the fractal dimension by using all data of a certain pressure level for a whole month in a double logarithmic scatter plot. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> an example is shown for January 2017, in the Supplement another example provided for July 2017).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e1794">Determination of the fractal dimension via fits to the area-perimeter relation (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) for January 2017. Blue dots indicate the data points (tuple (A,P)), red lines are the fits from linear regression. Left: Pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Middle: Pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Right: Pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1853">In the scatter plots the data is confined to a linear point cloud. There is a perceptible change in slope at areas of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As this signature is  weak, we do not separate these two regimes in this evaluation. It might be related to the fact that the horizontal extent of objects on isobaric surfaces in the Earth's atmosphere is limited by the finite surface of the Earth. This can also be seen in the investigations of the horizontal extents in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>. A linear regression is applied to the complete dataset of each respective month, and the resulting slope is used to determine the respective fractal or self-similar dimension, as indicated in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>). We find values in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.375, i.e. values well above the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a geometric object.</p>
      <p id="d2e1911">As illustrated in the simple examples presented in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>, the increase of fractal dimension for larger objects might be driven either by more elongated objects (for example the systematically stretched rectangular) or by more frayed objects. Both reasons seem to be plausible from the presented snapshots in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, but a clear attribution is not possible.</p>
      <p id="d2e1920">Finally, we determine the annual evolution of the fractal dimension as obtained from monthly data at different pressure levels; the results are represented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>. We see a clear separation by vertical levels. For each month, the fractal dimensions are ordered, with the smallest value assigned to pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by the medium value at pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the highest value at pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fractal dimensions of the observed ISSRs are in the ranges  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.29 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.36 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.375 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). All fractal dimensions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> show a strong seasonal cycle with maxima during summer and minima during winter. The amplitude for the cycles is largest for the pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by a slightly reduced amplitude for the pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The variation of the monthly fractal dimension is smallest for the pressure level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but it is still well pronounced. The correlation coefficient for the linear fit indicating the quality of the fits by the linear regression are relatively high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Thus, we can conclude that these results are robust and constitute a new and pronounced feature of ISSRs. The influence of the grid resolution (i.e. grid coarsening) on the derived fractal dimension is discussed in the Supplement. Unless otherwise indicated, all plots and results are based on ERA5 data at a horizontal resolution of 0.25° in both longitude and latitude.</p>
      <p id="d2e2129">The large seasonal variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> might point to different physical formation mechanisms, as discussed below.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e2141">Fractal dimensions at three pressure levels (200 hPa in orange, 250 hPa in violet, and 300 hPa in dark blue) in a monthly resolution for the time span of 11 years of ERA5 data.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2150">Although this is the first study investigating the fractal nature of ISSRs, we can try to compare our results to similar studies on fractal dimensions, e.g., for high clouds observed in satellite data and models with global storm resolving resolutions. Since ice clouds form in ISSRs, there should be a comparable relationship. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.44"/> evaluated satellite data (spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of (ice) clouds and found a fractal dimension of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for high cirrus clouds, and a fractal dimension of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for cumulonimbus clouds. These values are in the same range as values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> found in this study, showing clear fractal properties of clouds. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.45"/> investigated satellite data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid) and high resolution model data (initialized using the ECMWF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis data, linear resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the core ensemble) and found fractal dimensions in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.45 for the satellite data, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.53 for the different (high-resolution) models, which are also comparable to our findings. Since we are not distinguishing between cloudy and clear air inside ISSRs, there might be a mixture of different signatures of clouds and cloud free air massses (constituting all ISSRs). Nevertheless, these results show that ISSRs exhibit a clear signature of self-similarity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Horizontal extent of ISSRs</title>
      <p id="d2e2289">Although ISSRs are quasi 2D objects on isobaric surfaces, a common measure for ISSRs is the so-called pathlength. The pathlegth is the distance traveled by an aircraft within an ISSR. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.46"/> first investigated pathlength statistics of ISSRs using data from the MOZAIC project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.47"/>, this study was later extended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.48"/> for the IAGOS data set <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.49"/>. The pathlengths, constituting 1D tracks through 3D objects, give a first idea about the horizontal extent and the shape of ISSRs. Since we use quasi 2D data (at pressure levels) in this study, we can generate artificial pathlengths in order to simulate the distribution of realistic pathlengths. These can be used in two different ways. First, using zonal and meridional directions (i.e. East-West, North-South, respectively), we can statistically investigate the horizontal extent (or span) of ISSRs in a systematic but less realistic way. Second, we can generate more realistic pathlengths in using simulated flight tracks along geodesics between frequently used airports. These tracks are chosen specifically to cover routes also included in the IAGOS project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.50"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2307">The zonal and meridional extents are not measured as a means to obtain the largest extent in one direction, but rather to generate a full set of spans along latitudes/longitudes touched by the respective ISSR. Thus, the ISSR is  measured in “slices” with a spacing of 0.25°. This procedure is carried out for both zonal and meridional directions. The resulting data is separated by seasons, i.e. summer (JJA) and winter (DJF), and is used to derive statistical distributions of the horizontal extent of ISSRs.</p>
      <p id="d2e2310">The data used deliberately does not include measurements shorter than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as this is approximately the longest single-pixel length that can be measured in the target region. Including distances below that threshold is not meaningful, since this would introduce artificial biases stemming from different pixel sizes at different locations, leading to artificial breaks of regimes. Note that we still use the data set with the restriction of a minimum of 24 pixels per ISSR. This might also crucially reduce the number of small ISSRs in the evaluation, but this is consistent with our investigations in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2327">Former investigations of pathlength statistics showed Weibull-type distributions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.51"/>, or at least the distributions could be well represented using Weibull-type fits. We emphasize that the application of the Weibull distribution in this context is purely empirical. In contrast to classical extreme-value statistics, we do not consider maxima of underlying distributions, but rather the full population of pathlengths. Therefore, a strict interpretation in the framework of extreme-value theory is not appropriate here. Instead, the Weibull distribution is used as an empirical fitting function that provides a good representation of the observed distributions and allows for a compact characterization via its parameters, which is consistent with above mentioned studies studying ISSR distributions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2334">The probability density function of a Weibull distributed random variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with shape parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and scale parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> determines the overall shape of the distribution. It can be obtained by using a Weibull plot (and the cumulative distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with linear regression. The slope of the regression line is the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For more details about Weibull plots we refer to Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S4"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Span along Longitude</title>
      <p id="d2e2480">First, we investigate the meridional slices, i.e. pathlengths along longitudes. Since the major variation of horizontal extents is between winter and summer, we exclusively show these results in all respective figures. The probability density functions for winter and summer, differentiated into three pressure levels are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>. The mean and median values are reported in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e2489">Distributions of meridional span (i.e. pathlengths in North-South direction) for summer (JJA, orange colors) and winter (DJF, blue colors). Mean values are indicated by vertical dashed lines, median values are indicated by vertical dotted lines. Left: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Middle: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Right: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2534">For all pressure levels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/250/300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the mean meridional extent of ISSRs is significantly higher in winter compared to the summer months. While the density does not differ substantially between seasons for ISSRs up to a size of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the disparity between summer and winter inflates with increasing measured span. The absolute mean span increases with decreasing pressure (i.e. with rising altitude levels). The relative difference comparing summer and winter slightly increases with higher pressure (i.e. lower altitudes). All values are reported in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>. The strong seasonal cycle is present in both the mean values and the extreme tails of the distributions. In winter, the season with maximum mean values, a clear enhanced probability of finding extremely large pathlengths (i.e. enhanced values in the tail of the distribution) can be seen, whereas the probability of extremely large pathlengths is reduced in summer. The histograms are not symmetric but right-skewed, so the mean is pulled upward by few large ISSRs. The median is more robust and thus more suitable to assess the typical 2D features of ISSRs. The median behaves similarly to the mean in that it generally decreases with increasing pressure, the exception being a minor increase from 200 to 250 hPa in the summer months.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2578">Mean and median values of the meridional span (pathlength in North–South direction, in km) for DJF and JJA at different pressure levels.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Mean </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Median </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DJF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JJA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DJF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">JJA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">432.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">309.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">305.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">221.99</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">403.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">309.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">277.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">222.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">376.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">260.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">250.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">167.35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2706">The data shows two regimes with roughly linear correlation but different slopes in the Weibull plots (i.e. in the respective values of parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>. Thus, there are two distinct distributions superimposed in the histograms. The transition between these regimes is roughly located at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the smaller ISSRs we find values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the distribution is close to an exponential distribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the larger ISSRs.</p>
      <p id="d2e2765">The presence of two clearly separated size regimes suggests different formation mechanisms of ISSRs operating at distinct spatial scales, i.e. synoptic-scale vs. localized on mesoscales, leading to characteristic horizontal extents. This hypothesis is subject to further investigation, since an in depth analysis is out of scope of this study.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e2770">Weibull plots for the pathlength distributions in North-South direction. The linear regression fit is shown for the regimes of pathlengths smaller and larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed vertical line). Blue/orange colors indicate winter/summer data, respectively. The fits to the different regimes are represented by a dashed and a solid line.   Left: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Middle: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Right: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Span along Latitude</title>
      <p id="d2e2844">Alike investigating the meridional slices along longitudes, we now investigate horizontal extents along latitudes, i.e. slices in zonal (East–West) direction within ISSRs. The probability density functions for the two seasons (summer/winter), separated into three pressure levels, are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e2851">Distributions of zonal span (i.e. pathlengths in East-West direction) for different seasons, i.e. summer (JJA, orange colors) and winter (DJF, blue colors). Mean values are indicated by vertical dashed lines, median values are indicated by vertical dotted lines. Left: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Middle: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Right: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2896">The distribution of measured zonal distances shows almost identical qualitative characteristics as the meridional counterpart. We see a strong decrease in frequency of occurrence for spans larger than the mean values. In contrast to the meridional distributions, there is an additional very small mode at very large spans (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating the occurrence of very few very large ISSRs in East-West direction. This difference can be explained by pathlengths in meridional direction being limited to the 30–80° N range we study, while zonal pathlengths can theoretically extend to the length of the latitude. For all pressure levels, the mean span is significantly higher in the winter months compared to the summer months. Differences in the distribution of spans by season are most clear for larger spans. The mean generally decreases slightly with a higher pressure level. The decrease in mean span with higher pressure is more evident in the summer months. Analogous to the meridional observations, the median is consistently lower than the mean. The median increases marginally from 200 to 250 hPa  in winter but behaves analogous to the mean in all other instances. It is lowest at the highest pressure level. As with the meridional span, the distribution is right-skewed. All values are reported in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. We see the same feature of enhanced probability for extremely large pathlengths during winter and reduced probability during summer.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2924">Mean and median values of the zonal span (pathlength in East–West direction, in km) for DJF and JJA at different pressure levels.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Mean </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Median </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DJF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JJA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DJF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">JJA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">423.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">337.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">281.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">226.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">423.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">323.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">285.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">221.48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">407.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">275.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">271.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">184.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e3052">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/> we investigate the Weibull plots for the distributions. For the zonal spans, three distinct regimes are visible. There is a regime of very small spans (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), without a clear Weibull signature in the Weibull plot. In addition, there are two further regimes, separated at values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which show linear behavior in the Weibull plots, thus indicating two different regimes clearly distinguishable by a different Weibull parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The regime of intermediate spans of ISSRs results in an almost exponential distribution (Weibull parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas the regime of very large spans shows a Weibull characteristic with parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This characteristic remains virtually identical across seasons.</p>
      <p id="d2e3131">The regime of very small pathlengths might be an artifact of the evaluation. The real area of a pixel (or grid point) depends crucially on the latitude. Scanning high latitude circles will systematically produce small horizontal sizes for ISSRs consisting of few pixels.</p>
      <p id="d2e3134">The tiny mode of very large spans of ISSRs of orders up to almost latitudinal circumference might indicate the impact of synoptic and large scale weather systems, triggering atmospheric flows in the zonal direction with a persistent vertical upward motion, thus leading to a persistence of ice supersaturation in the UTLS. The upper bound of such synoptically driven ISSRs is given by the circumference of the Earth at certain latitudes.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e3139">Weibull plots for the pathlength distributions in East-West direction. The linear regression fit is shown for the regimes of pathlengths smaller and larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dashed vertical line). with a clear scale break at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (indicated by a dotted line). Blue/orange colors indicate winter/summer data. The fits to the different regimes are represented by a dashed and a solid line. Left: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Middle: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Right: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Span along modeled aircraft tracks (pathlengths)</title>
      <p id="d2e3238">In addition to the rather artificial longitudinal and latitudinal measurements, realistic pathlengths are investigated. In lieu of real in situ measurements, tracks along commercial aircraft routes are investigated. We exemplarily chose three transatlantic flight routes based on the flight tracks frequently found in the IAGOS data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.52"/>. The three tracks (i.e. direct flight routes Berlin–Chicago, Frankfurt–Atlanta, and Paris–Miami) are assumed as geodesics on a sphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>). The pathlengths are obtained by measuring the distance along the sections of ice supersaturation on the flight track from airport to airport.</p>

      <fig id="F12"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e3248">Typical flight routes of commercial air traffic for some important airports in the US (Chicago, Atlanta, Miami) and Europe (Berlin, Frankfurt, Paris). These flight routes can be seen in the measurement data from the IAGOS project.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3257">The histograms (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>) show numerical artifacts for small ISSRs. We find the same features of pathlength statistics for mean values and distributions as  in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>. The winter months yield the highest mean pathlengths while summer returns the shortest mean distances. For all seasons there is an increase of mean and median values with increasing altitude. The highest mean/median pathlengths can be found at the highest level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the lowest values at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with intermediate values at the level  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The distributions mostly agree for the two seasons, with a larger deviation for the largest pathlengths. During winter, there are more large ISSRs than during summer. The mean and median values of the pathlength distributions are represented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>. The mean exceeds the median in all instances.</p>

      <fig id="F13" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d2e3320">Distributions of realistic pathlengths for different seasons as simulated by assuming common flight tracks (as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>) for different seasons, i.e. summer (JJA, orange colors) and winter (DJF, blue colors). Mean values are indicated by vertical dashed lines, median values are indicated by vertical dotted lines. Left: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Middle: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Right: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3370">Mean and median values of pathlengths (i.e. artificial flight tracks, in km) for DJF and JJA at different pressure levels.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Mean </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Median </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DJF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JJA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DJF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">JJA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">411.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">321.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">262.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">215.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">356.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">301.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">230.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">207.64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">342.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">265.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">224.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">179.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e3498">In the evaluation of the Weibull plots (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F14"/>), we find two different regimes of distinct Weibull distributions with different values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, separated at pathlengths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, analogous to the meridional extents. The difference in the regimes is more pronounced compared to the former evaluation, and the signal of the very large zonal extents is missing in this evaluation. This is expected, as the largest possible extent is the distance between airports. As before, we overlook the very small pathlengths in the linear regression. For both regimes, the seasonal cycle is not strongly pronounced. In the small pathlengths regime, we find values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas in the regime of large pathlengths, the values are close to an exponential distribution, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This signal is very robust, with almost no seasonal variation in the parameters or with respect to the different levels.</p>

      <fig id="F14" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d2e3555">Weibull plots for the pathlength distributions of realistic pathlengths simulated by common flight tracks. The linear regression fit is shown for the regimes of pathlengths between 40 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and pathlengths larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this threshold being indicated by a dotted line. Blue/orange colors indicate winter/summer data, respectively. The fits to the different regimes are represented by a dashed and a solid line. Left: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Middle: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Right: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Agreement of pathlength distributions</title>
      <p id="d2e3644">The results of the longitudinal, latitudinal and pathlength measurements agree well with another. The observation of the summer months yielding the shortest and winter the longest mean distances generally holds true across methods. This agreement applies to most results in terms of dependence on pressure level as well. The mean span is generally larger at lower pressures, i.e. higher up in the atmosphere. While this is always true for the comparison between levels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in the intermediate level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> some variations can be seen. The mean values for zonal extents are generally larger than those for the meridional extents and the flight track pathlengths. This feature likely stems from ISSRs usually extending more in East-West direction (as shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>), driven by the mean large scale flow.</p>
      <p id="d2e3699">The results of the simulated IAGOS flights have a larger qualitative agreement with the meridional extents. In both cases, there is a scale break at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> , separating two different modes of Weibull distributions. The tiny mode of exceptionally large spans as found in the zonal slices cannot be detected in the pathlengths of realistic flight tracks. These very few, very large ISSRs are mostly elongated into zonal direction and the maximum of possible pathlength is limited by flight track length.</p>
      <p id="d2e3721">The distributions as well as the mean (and median) values of the simulated pathlengths compare qualitatively well with the former investigations of pathlengths as obtained from aircraft measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.53"/>. The mean (and median) values as obtained from the ERA5 data are generally larger than those of aircraft data. This is not surprising, since the aircraft data has a much higher temporal (and thus spatial) resolution. The Weibull shaped distributions can be seen in all evaluations with a varying degree of prominence of a scale break at pathlengths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fitted Weibull parameter of the distributions differ between aircraft data and ERA5 evaluation. The general feature of a smaller slope for pathlengths below the scale break and a higher slope for pathlengths above the scale break is present in all evaluations. The difference in slopes for aircraft vs. ERA5 data is likely due to the different resolutions of the data sets. Finally, we see that the range of the obtained distributions of pathlengths is roughly the same in all investigations (ranging from few 10 km up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5000</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e3769">Ice supersaturated regions in the UTLS are important potential formation regions of ice clouds and contrails. For a better understanding of these regions on different scales and resolutions, we investigated ISSRs in ERA5 data as “macroscopic” and quasi two dimensional objects on pressure levels in the UTLS. We can summarize the main findings as follows:</p>
      <p id="d2e3772">ISSR characteristics tend to have seasonal cycles. We can observe this in both the number and total area of ISSRs. The number of ISSRs is largest during summer and smallest during winter across all pressure levels. The total area covered by ISSRs shows the same behaviour. While the total area is largest in summer, the average area per ISSRs is significantly smaller during the summer months. In addition to their seasonal variability, ISSR number and area display a distinct vertical structure. The number of ISSRs is highest for lower altitudes and declines with decreasing pressure. We find the same vertical layering for the total area of ISSRs with a decrease in total area with increasing altitude. The vertical variation of total area itself is subject to a seasonal cycle. Area values at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa approach those at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer but drop significantly lower than the latter in winter. The average area per ISSR shows little vertical variability with the exception of higher values in summer at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This effect can be attributed to the larger amplitude in total area at that pressure level. The larger amplitude is a feature caused by the seasonally differing altitude of the tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.54"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3814">The calculated values of fractal dimension of ISSRs are in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.175</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.375</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A pronounced seasonal cycle is evident for the fractal dimensions as well, producing larger values in summer and smaller values in winter. This signal appears on all considered pressure levels. The fractal dimensions also show a distinct vertical layering with largest values for low altitudes and lower values for high altitudes.</p>
      <p id="d2e3833">In the evaluation of the horizontal extents of ISSRs, i.e. deriving pathlengths in various ways (artificial East-West and North-South spans vs. realistic flight paths), the seasonal variation is maintained. Generally, we find smaller pathlengths during summer (smaller mean values, less extremes), whereas during winter the pathlengths are generally larger (larger mean value, more large pathlengths). This feature is robust for all evaluated pressure levels. In the pathlengths statistics, we find different regimes, as also indicated by different values of the shape parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Weibull plots, indicating a superposition of two different Weibull distributions.</p>
      <p id="d2e3844">As can be seen in the simple exercise in Appendix B about changes in fractal dimensions, more elongated or even strongly frayed objects have larger fractal dimensions than their strictly geometric counterparts (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As indicated by the snap-shots in Figs. 3 and 4, in summer the ISSRs are more elongated and more frayed than in winter. The fractal dimension is larger for ISSRs in summer, thus we expect more frayed/elongated objects. In turn, these objects result in shorter pathlengths, as traversing them generally involves smaller cross sections of ice supersaturation. On the other hand, ISSRs in winter have smaller fractal dimensions, thus suggesting a more compact shape. This is consistent with the pathlength statistics, as traversing more compact objects results in fewer short pathlengths and, on average, larger cross sections. Thus, the seasonal cycles of fractal dimensions and pathlengths are physically consistent.</p>
      <p id="d2e3859">Consistent with our initial hypothesis, the analysis of the area–perimeter relationship demonstrates that ISSRs in the UTLS exhibit self-similar (fractal) behavior.</p>
      <p id="d2e3862">The strong contrast between fractal properties of ISSRs for different seasons suggest different formation processes. For this we might also take into account the seasonal fluctuation in the number of ISSRs with a peak in summer. A possible explanation is the transportation of water vapor into the UTLS by convection during the summer months. A multitude of convection sites causes high ISSR numbers while the winter months are dominated by low pressure areas and frontal systems. The ascending air flow of the warm conveyor belt causes a connected area of supersaturation. This hypotheses is supported by the shorter mean latitudinal and longitudinal spans in summer compared to winter months. It is further corroborated by the pronounced seasonal cycle in the mean area of ISSRs. The distinct maximum in winter and clear minimum in summer is consistent with the proposed formation mechanisms: convective processes in summer produce more localized ISSRs, whereas large-scale dynamics in winter lead to more extended structures. Extending this hypothesis to the seasonal variation in the fractal dimension, particularly during the period with the lowest values in summer, provides two possible interpretations. One perspective suggests that convective sites lead to ISSRs with frayed boundaries, resulting in long perimeters compared to the smoother edges of ISSRs caused by frontal activity, i.e. large scale dynamics. An alternative interpretation posits that multiple convective “bubbles” occurring in close proximity may be collectively labeled as a single ISSR. This would lead to elevated perimeters attributed to their intricate structure and the added internal perimeter created by holes that segregate convective regions.</p>
      <p id="d2e3865">In addition, the scale break in the Weibull plots of the pathlengths at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is consistent with former investigations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.55"/>, also suggest a possible superposition of two different populations of ISSRs. This can possibly originate in the slopes corresponding to smaller and larger ISSRs. Smaller scale ISSRs form in localized lifting phenomena like convection. Frontal activity and large scale dynamics create larger areas of supersaturation with respect to ice.</p>
      <p id="d2e3894">Our findings of seasonal variation and vertical layering in ISSR numbers are consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.56"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.57"/>. The pathlengths statistics and Weibull distributions are in good agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.58"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.59"/> found similar dimension values for clouds. These consistencies with former studies allow confidence in our results. However, fractal dimensions of ISSRs have not previously been quantified systematically from ERA5 data (to our knowledge), representing a novel contribution.</p>
      <p id="d2e3909">When interpreting the presented results, limitations need to be considered. As the study is based on ERA5 reanalysis data, the identified ISSRs and their geometric characteristics depend on the representation of humidity and on the spatial resolution of the underlying data set. Changes due to the coarsening of the grid are discussed in the Supplement. Confirming our findings with studies on measured rather than modeled data could act as an endorsement to incorporate self-similar and fractal characteristics in other models.</p>
      <p id="d2e3913">Treating ISSRs as quasi 2D objects on isobaric surfaces neglects their three-dimensional nature. This does not substantially affect our confidence in the results, as previous investigations have successfully characterized ISSRs using one-dimensional pathlength statistics, whereas this study extends the analysis to two-dimensional properties.</p>
      <p id="d2e3916">Future studies using different definitions of fractal dimension (e.g. the Hausdorff dimension) might substantiate our understanding of the fractal properties of ISSRs. Although the results allow the hypothesis of convective influences during summer and large-scale dynamical forcing during winter, an in depth investigation of formation processes is beyond the scope of this study, but is planned as future investigation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3919">The impact and implications of these findings are broad. The identification of fractal structures enriches scientific inquiry by providing new tools for analysis and offering deeper insights into the complexity of natural phenomena. The self-similarity of ISSRs reshapes our understanding of ISSRs as irregular but organized spatial structures across a broad range of scales with systematic seasonal and vertical variation. This study has significance for our understanding of humidity variability in the UTLS, cirrus formation, and consequently the radiation budget of the atmosphere. The observed seasonal changes in ISSR geometry suggest that the dominant mechanisms controlling ice supersaturation vary throughout the year, with convective processes contributing more strongly during summer and large-scale dynamical lifting playing a larger role during winter. The fractal nature of ISSRs further indicates that substantial spatial variability persists across scales. As a more practical aspect of the analysis, the fractal properties of ISSRs must be taken into account for the highly discussed concepts of contrail avoidance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Looking at the examples of frayed ISSRs in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, it seems to be very optimistic that contrail avoidance might work in a meaningful, impactful or feasible way. The large amount of small ISSRs (or short pathlengths) in connection with the huge fractal objects makes it very difficult to manage efficient contrail avoidance in the Northern Hemisphere.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Methods for evaluation</title>
      <p id="d2e3942">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA1"/> two possible definitions of neighborhoods of points on gridded data are shown, originating from investigations with cellular automaton <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.61"/>. Given a 4-neighborhood (or von Neumann neighborhood), the central pixel is only connected to pixels via the four edges of the point. A 8-neighborhood (or Moore neighborhood) is defined as the central pixel being additionally connected to pixels via the diagonals<fn id="App1.Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d2e3950">In the description of the used program package, the 4-neighborhood is called 1-connectivity, and the 8-neighborhood is called 2-connectivity. In fact, in literature these terms are not frequently used.</p></fn>. In our evaluation, we choose the Moore neighborhood, since the physical properties as connectivity should not depend on a grid representation, i.e. rotation of the object should result into the “same” connected object.</p>

      <fig id="FA1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e3956">Two possible measures for connecting points on gridded data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.62"/>. Black square: Center point. Left: Blue crosses indicate points connected to the central point using the 4-neighborhood (von Neumann neighborhood). Middle: Red circles indicate points connected to the central point using the 8-neighborhood (Moore neighborhood). Right: Assignment of area to a grid point, using a halo of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> degrees.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e3978">For the derivation of the grid point's area we use the coordinates of the point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the center of a rectangular with vertices <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see right panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA1"/>). The area (in square metres) is then assigned to the grid point, taking into account the latitudinal stretching of the grid. For the derivation of the perimeter, we use the four edges of the introduced rectangular, with the respective length (in metres). If there is no neighboring grid with index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, the edge is counted as part of the perimeter.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Changes in fractal dimensions</title>
      <p id="d2e4038">In this appendix we illustrate some effects which might have some influence on the change in the fractal dimension. We use the area-perimeter relation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the investigations. For geometric objects, the fractal dimension coincides with the classical integer values dimension, as can be seen directly for simple examples as spheres, squares, rectangulars with fixed ratio of sides. <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e4063">Sphere: For a sphere with radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> we easily calculate the perimeter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus leading to the derivation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which immediately gives <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e4200">Rectangular with fixed ratio of sides: We assume sides <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a fixed value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; thus,  we calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that the example of a square (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is included here, leading to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list> As a first example for a fractal object, we compare the fractal dimension of a square with a systematically stretched rectangular, i.e. we change the ratio between the two sides, while we proceed to larger sizes. In fact, we set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, we can calculate

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>B1</label><mml:math id="M206" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        leading to the area-perimeter relation

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>B2</label><mml:math id="M207" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Applying the logarithm, we can derive an approximate value of the dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (and also the constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e4568">Using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we obtain for the dimension

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>B3</label><mml:math id="M212" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        For large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> we find <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus we find

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>B4</label><mml:math id="M216" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⇔</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        and we also obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the left panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/> the area-perimeter relation for a square and a stretched rectangular are shown together with the theoretically derived values for the fits. The systematically stretched rectangular turns into a more line-shaped geometric object,  thus changing the fractal dimension to larger values.</p>

      <fig id="FB1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d2e4921">Examples of fractal dimension for 2D objects. Left: square vs. stretched rectangular. Right: square vs. frayed square. The fractal dimension of the frayed square is determined using linear regression to the data points in logarithmic scale. The fits to the other objects are based on the theoretically obtained values.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f16.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e4931">As a second example, we investigate a square, with a systematically frayed boundary leading to a slightly smaller area but to a strongly enhanced perimeter. A regular, unfrayed square would yield a (fractal) dimension of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the frayed square, we see that the fractal dimension is also enhanced, leading to values of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The scatter plot of the normal square and the frayed square, respectively, is shown in the right panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/>, together with the linear fit via regression. These two mechanisms (stretching and fraying) can for instance serve for changing fractal dimensions of “two dimensional” geometric objects.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title>Potential errors for gridded data: Overestimation of perimeters</title>
      <p id="d2e4968">It is well known that the calculation of perimeter on gridded  data lead to overestimation of this quantity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.63"/>. However, it is not completely clear if and how the area-perimeter relation might change due to this error. Exemplarily, we investigate this for a sphere. We calculate the area and perimeter according to the methods explained above and compare these values with the analytically calculated quantities. The area-perimeter relations are represented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4976">Despite a systematic shift in perimeters, the resulting fractal dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.999564</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (as a linear fit to the double logarithmic scatter plot) is very close to the analytically determined “fractal” dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, we are confident that the systematic overestimation of perimeters does not disturb the quantitative investigations of area-perimeter relations.</p>

      <fig id="FC1"><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d2e5005">Systematic error for determining perimeters of spheres on gridded data. Blue circles indicate the exact values (with a fractal dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), red squares indicate the numerically derived values (with a fractal dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.999564</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The dimensions were obtained using a linear regression to the data points in logarithmic scale.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/11235/2026/acp-26-11235-2026-f17.png"/>

      </fig>

</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S4">
  <label>Appendix D</label><title>Weibull plots</title>
      <p id="d2e5046">Here we give a short explanation for the use of the Weibull plot. The general form of a Weibull probability distribution of a non-negative random variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S4.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>D1</label><mml:math id="M225" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        with the shape parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, responsible for the slope of the distribution, and the scale parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The cumulative distribution (i.e. via integration) can be written as

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S4.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>D2</label><mml:math id="M228" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i.e.</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        This equation can be reformulated as follows.

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M229" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S4.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>D3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>⇔</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S4.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>D4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>⇔</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>⇔</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S4.E13"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>D5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Finally, we end with this equation

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S4.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>D6</label><mml:math id="M230" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        thus constituting a linear relationship between the quantities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>:=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, using a scatter plot of variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we can derive the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> via linear regression.</p>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5543">The ERA5 reanalysis data used in this study are publicly available from the ECMWF MARS archive (<uri>https://apps.ecmwf.int/data-catalogues/era5/?class=ea</uri>, last access: 20 June 2024; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="altparen.64"/>). The processing code used to generate all derived data and figures is archived on Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21158240" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.21158240</ext-link>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="altparen.65"/>). The derived intermediate data are fully reproducible from the publicly available ERA5 data using the archived processing code and are therefore not archived separately due to their size.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5558">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11235-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11235-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5567">HS, PS and PR designed the study. HS and SN developed the data evaluation methods, HS carried out the data analysis. HS, PS and PR discussed the results, and wrote the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5573">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5579">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5585">This article is part of the special issue “The tropopause region in a changing atmosphere (TPChange) (ACP/AMT/GMD/WCD inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5592">We thank two anonymous reviewers for important comments leading to an overall improvement of the manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5597">This research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. DFG TRR301 TPChange, subprojects B07 and C01, Project-ID 428312742) and the Carl Zeiss Foundation (grant no. P2018-02-003, project “Big Data in Atmospheric Physics (BINARY)”).This open-access publication was funded  by Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5608">This paper was edited by Jianzhong Ma and reviewed by Lilli Freischem and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Batista-Tomás et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Batista-Tomás, A., Díaz, O., Batista-Leyva, A., and Altshuler, E.: Classification and dynamics of tropical clouds by their fractal dimension, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 983–988, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2699" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2699</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Benner and Curry(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Benner, T. and Curry, J.: Characteristics of small tropical cumulus clouds and their impact on the environment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 28753–28767, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD02579</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Brinkhoff et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Brinkhoff, L. A., von Savigny, C., Randall, C. E., and Burrows, J. P.: The fractal perimeter dimension of noctilucent clouds: Sensitivity analysis of the area-perimeter method and results on the seasonal and hemispheric dependence of the fractal dimension, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phy., 127, 66–72, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2014.06.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2014.06.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Cahalan and Joseph(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Cahalan, R. and Joseph, J.: Fractal Statistics Of Cloud Fields, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 261–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;0261:FSOCF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;0261:FSOCF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Cahalan et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Cahalan, R., Ridgway, W., Wiscombe, W., Bell, T., and Snider, J.: The Albedo of Fractal Stratocumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2434–2455, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051&lt;2434:TAOFSC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051&lt;2434:TAOFSC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Cheng(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Q.: The perimeter-area fractal model and its application to geology, Math. Geol., 27, 69–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02083568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02083568</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Chopard and Droz(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Chopard, B. and Droz, M.: Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems, Collection Alea-Saclay: Monographs and Texts in Statistical Physics, Cambridge University Press, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549755" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511549755</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Christensen and Driver(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Christensen, H. M. and Driver, O. G. A.: The Fractal Nature of Clouds in Global Storm-Resolving Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095746" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL095746</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Clough et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Clough, S. A., Iacono, M. J., and Moncet, J.: Line‐by‐line calculations of atmospheric fluxes and cooling rates: Application to water vapor, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 15761–15785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01419" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD01419</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Dessler and Sherwood(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Dessler, A. E. and Sherwood, S. C.: A matter of humidity, Science, 323, 1020–1021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171264" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1171264</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>DeWitt et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>DeWitt, T. D., Garrett, T. J., Rees, K. N., Bois, C., Krueger, S. K., and Ferlay, N.: Climatologically invariant scale invariance seen in distributions of cloud horizontal sizes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 109–122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-109-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-109-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Diao et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Avallone, L. M., Paige, M. E., Beaton, S. P., Campos, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Cloud-scale ice-supersaturated regions spatially correlate with high water vapor heterogeneities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2639–2656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2639-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2639-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Florio et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Florio, B. J., Fawell, P. D., and Small, M.: The use of the perimeter-area method to calculate the fractal dimension of aggregates, Powder Technol., 343, 551–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.030</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Fusina et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Fusina, F., Spichtinger, P., and Lohmann, U.: Impact of ice supersaturated regions and thin cirrus on radiation in the midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008449</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Gettelman et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A., Fetzer, E. J., Eldering, A., and Irion, F. W.: The Global Distribution of Supersaturation in the Upper Troposphere from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder, J. Climate, 19, 6089 – 6103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3955.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3955.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Gierens and Spichtinger(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Gierens, K. and Spichtinger, P.: On the size distribution of ice-supersaturated regions in the upper troposphere and lowermost stratosphere, Ann. Geophys., 18, 499–504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2002/0011-0083" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/0941-2948/2002/0011-0083</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Gotoh and Fujii(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Gotoh, K. and Fujii, Y.: A fractal dimensional analysis on the cloud shape parameters of cumulus over land, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 1283–1292, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037&lt;1283:AFDAOT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037&lt;1283:AFDAOT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Haywood et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Haywood, J. M., Allan, R. P., Bornemann, J., Forster, P. M., Francis, P. N., Milton, S., Rädel, G., Rap, A., Shine, K. P., and Thorpe, R.: A case study of the radiative forcing of persistent contrails evolving into contrail-induced cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012650" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012650</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Held and Soden(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Held, I. M. and Soden, B. J.: Water vapor feedback and global warming, Annu. Rev. Energ. Environ., 25, 441–475, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.441" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.441</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz‐Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020 (data available at: <uri>https://apps.ecmwf.int/data-catalogues/era5/?class=ea</uri>, last access: 20 June 2024).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Imre(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Imre, A.: Artificial fractal dimension obtained by using perimeter-area relationship on digitalized images, Appl. Math. Comput., 173, 443–449, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.042</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Joseph and Cahalan(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Joseph, J. and Cahalan, R.: Nearest Neighbor Spacing of Fair Weather Cumulus Clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol., 29, 793–805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029&lt;0793:NNSOFW&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029&lt;0793:NNSOFW&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Klinkenberg(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Klinkenberg, B.: A review of methods used to determine the fractal dimension of linear features, Math. Geol., 26, 23–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065874" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02065874</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Köhler et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, D., Reutter, P., and Spichtinger, P.: Relative humidity over ice as a key variable for Northern Hemisphere midlatitude tropopause inversion layers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10055–10072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10055-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-10055-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Krämer et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Lamquin et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Lamquin, N., Stubenrauch, C. J., Gierens, K., Burkhardt, U., and Smit, H.: A global climatology of upper-tropospheric ice supersaturation occurrence inferred from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder calibrated by MOZAIC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 381–405, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-381-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-381-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Lee et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Lee, D., Pitari, G., Grewe, V., Gierens, K., Penner, J., Petzold, A., Prather, M., Schumann, U., Bais, A., Berntsen, T., Iachetti, D., Lim, L., and Sausen, R.: Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Aviation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 4678–4734, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.005</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Lee et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Lee, D., Fahey, D., Skowron, A., Allen, M., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty, S., Freeman, S., Forster, P., Fuglestvedt, J., Gettelman, A., De León, R., Lim, L., Lund, M., Millar, R., Owen, B., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Prather, M., Sausen, R., and Wilcox, L.: The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Lovejoy(1982)</label><mixed-citation>Lovejoy, S.: Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas, Science, 216, 185–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.216.4542.185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.216.4542.185</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Lovejoy and Mandelbrot(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Lovejoy, S. and Mandelbrot, B. B.: Fractal properties of rain, and a fractal model, Tellus A, 37A, 209–232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.1985.tb00423.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0870.1985.tb00423.x</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Mandelbrot(1982)</label><mixed-citation> Mandelbrot, B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W. H. Freeman and Co., ISBN 0-7167-1186-9, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Mandelbrot et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Mandelbrot, B. B., Passoja, D. E., and Paullay, A. J.: Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals, Nature, 308, 721–722, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/308721a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/308721a0</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Marenco et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Marenco, A., Thouret, V., Nédélec, P., Smit, H., Helten, M., Kley, D., Karcher, F., Simon, P., Law, K., Pyle, J., Poschmann, G., von Wrede, R., Hume, C., and Cook, T.: Measurement of ozone and water vapor by Airbus in-service aircraft: The MOZAIC airborne program, An overview, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 25631–25642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00977" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD00977</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Murphy and Koop(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M. and Koop, T.: Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1539–1565, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.94" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1256/qj.04.94</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Peitgen et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Peitgen, H.-O., Jürgens, H., and Saupe, D.: Chaos and fractals – new frontiers of science, 2nd edn., Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-20229-7, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/b97624" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/b97624</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Petzold et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Thouret, V., Gerbig, C., Zahn, A., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Gallagher, M., Hermann, M., Pontaud, M., Ziereis, H., Boulanger, D., Marshall, J., Nédélec, P., Smit, H. G. J., Friess, U., Flaud, J.-M., Wahner, A., Cammas, J.-P., Volz-Thomas, A., and Team, I.: Global-scale atmosphere monitoring by in-service aircraft–current achievements and future prospects of the European Research Infrastructure IAGOS, Tellus B, 67, 28452, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28452" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v67.28452</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Petzold et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Neis, P., Rütimann, M., Rohs, S., Berkes, F., Smit, H. G. J., Krämer, M., Spelten, N., Spichtinger, P., Nédélec, P., and Wahner, A.: Ice-supersaturated air masses in the northern mid-latitudes from regular in situ observations by passenger aircraft: vertical distribution, seasonality and tropospheric fingerprint, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8157–8179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8157-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-8157-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Petzold et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Khan, N. F., Li, Y., Spichtinger, P., Rohs, S., Crewell, S., Wahner, A., and Kramer, M.: Most long-lived contrails form within cirrus clouds with uncertain climate impact, Nat. Commun., 16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65532-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-025-65532-2</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Rees et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Rees, K. N., Garrett, T. J., DeWitt, T. D., Bois, C., Krueger, S. K., and Riedi, J. C.: A global analysis of the fractal properties of clouds revealing anisotropy of turbulence across scales, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 497–513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-497-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-31-497-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Reutter et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Reutter, P., Neis, P., Rohs, S., and Sauvage, B.: Ice supersaturated regions: properties and validation of ERA-Interim reanalysis with IAGOS in situ water vapour measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 787–804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-787-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-787-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Richardson(1926)</label><mixed-citation>Richardson, L. F.: Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 110, 709–737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1926.0043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.1926.0043</ext-link>, 1926.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Rys and Waldvogel(1986)</label><mixed-citation>Rys, F. and Waldvogel, A.: Fractal Shape Of Hail Clouds, Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 784–787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.784" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.784</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Sakellariou et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Sakellariou, M., Nakos, B., and Mitsakaki, C.: On the fractal character of rock surfaces, in: International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences &amp; geomechanics abstracts, vol. 28, 527–533, Pergamon, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(91)91129-F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0148-9062(91)91129-F</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Sanchez et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Sanchez, N., Alfaro, E., and Pérez, E.: The fractal dimension of projected clouds, Astrophys. J., 625, 849–856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/429553" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/429553</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Schuh(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Schuh, H. Z.: hzschuh/Fractal_Paper: Fractal Characteristics of Ice-Supersaturated Regions in the Tropopause Region of the northern midlatitudes (Version fractal_code_v1), Zenodo [software], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21158240" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.21158240</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Schumann(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Schumann, U.: On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts, Meteorol. Z., 5, 4–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/metz/5/1996/4</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Siebesma and Jonker(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Siebesma, A. and Jonker, H.: Anomalous scaling of cumulus cloud boundaries, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 214–217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.214</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Snow et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Snow, A. D., Whitaker, J., Cochran, M., Miara, I., den Bossche, J. V., Mayo, C., Lucas, G., Cochrane, P., de Kloe, J., Karney, C., Shaw, J. J., Anh, T. Q., Filipe, Ouzounoudis, G., Dearing, J., Lostis, G., Couwenberg, B., Hoese, D., de Bittencourt, H., Little, B., May, R., Itkin, M., McDonald, D., Schneck, C., Gohlke, C., Jurd, B., Raspaud, M., Brett, M., and Meulien, M.: pyproj4/pyproj: 3.7.1 Release, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14876934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14876934</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Spichtinger and Leschner(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Spichtinger, P. and Leschner, M.: Horizontal scales of ice-supersaturated regions, Tellus B, 68, 29020, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v68.29020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v68.29020</ext-link>, 2016. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Spichtinger et al.(2003a)</label><mixed-citation>Spichtinger, P., Gierens, K., Leiterer, U., and Dier, H.: Ice supersaturation in the tropopause region over Lindenberg, Germany, Meteorol. Z., 12, 143–156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2003/0012-0143" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/0941-2948/2003/0012-0143</ext-link>, 2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Spichtinger et al.(2003b)</label><mixed-citation>Spichtinger, P., Gierens, K., and Read, W.: The global distribution of ice-supersaturated regions as seen by the Microwave Limb Sounder, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 3391–3410, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.141" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1256/qj.02.141</ext-link>, 2003b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Spichtinger et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Spichtinger, P., Gierens, K., Smit, H. G. J., Ovarlez, J., and Gayet, J.-F.: On the distribution of relative humidity in cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 639–647, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-639-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-639-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Sreenivasan(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Sreenivasan, K.: Fractals And Multifractals In Fluid Turbulence, Annual Rev. Fluid Mech., 23, 539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.002543" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.002543</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Sreenivasan and Meneveau(1986)</label><mixed-citation>Sreenivasan, K. and Meneveau, C.: The fractal facets of turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 173, 357–386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112086001209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0022112086001209</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Stuber et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Stuber, N., Forster, P., Rädel, G., and Shine, K.: The importance of the diurnal and annual cycle of air traffic for contrail radiative forcing, Nature, 441, 864–867, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04877" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature04877</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Vogelaar and Wakker(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Vogelaar, M. and Wakker, B.: Measuring the fractal structure of interstellar clouds, Astron. Astrophys., 291, 557–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3384-5_90" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-011-3384-5_90</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>von Savigny et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>von Savigny, C., Brinkhoff, L. A., Bailey, S. M., Randall, C. E., and Russell III, J. M.: First determination of the fractal perimeter dimension of noctilucent clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL045834</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Wegener(1910)</label><mixed-citation> Wegener, A.: Über die Eisphase des Wasserdampfes in der Atmosphäre (On the ice phase of water vapor in the atmosphere), Meteor. Z., 27, 451–459, 1910.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Wegener(1911)</label><mixed-citation>Wegener, A.: Thermodynamik der Atmosphäre, J. A. Barth, Leipzig, <uri>https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_kWtUAAAAMAAJ</uri> (last access: 5 August 2026), 1911.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Fractal characteristics of ice-supersaturated regions in the tropopause region of the northern midlatitudes</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Batista-Tomás et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Batista-Tomás, A., Díaz, O., Batista-Leyva, A., and Altshuler, E.:
Classification and dynamics of tropical clouds by their fractal dimension,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 983–988,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2699" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2699</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Benner and Curry(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Benner, T. and Curry, J.: Characteristics of small tropical cumulus clouds and
their impact on the environment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
103, 28753–28767, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02579" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02579</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Brinkhoff et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brinkhoff, L. A., von Savigny, C., Randall, C. E., and Burrows, J. P.: The
fractal perimeter dimension of noctilucent clouds: Sensitivity analysis of
the area-perimeter method and results on the seasonal and hemispheric
dependence of the fractal dimension, J. Atmos.
Solar-Terr. Phy., 127, 66–72, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2014.06.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2014.06.005</a>,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Cahalan and Joseph(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cahalan, R. and Joseph, J.: Fractal Statistics Of Cloud Fields, Mon. Weather
Rev., 117, 261–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;0261:FSOCF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;0261:FSOCF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Cahalan et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cahalan, R., Ridgway, W., Wiscombe, W., Bell, T., and Snider, J.: The Albedo of
Fractal Stratocumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 51,
2434–2455, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051&lt;2434:TAOFSC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051&lt;2434:TAOFSC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Cheng(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Q.: The perimeter-area fractal model and its application to geology,
Math. Geol., 27, 69–82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02083568" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02083568</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Chopard and Droz(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chopard, B. and Droz, M.: Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems,
Collection Alea-Saclay: Monographs and Texts in Statistical Physics,
Cambridge University Press, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549755" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549755</a>,
1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Christensen and Driver(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Christensen, H. M. and Driver, O. G. A.: The Fractal Nature of Clouds in Global
Storm-Resolving Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095746" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095746</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Clough et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clough, S. A., Iacono, M. J., and Moncet, J.: Line‐by‐line calculations of
atmospheric fluxes and cooling rates: Application to water vapor, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 15761–15785,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01419" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01419</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Dessler and Sherwood(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dessler, A. E. and Sherwood, S. C.: A matter of humidity, Science, 323,
1020–1021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171264" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171264</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>DeWitt et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
DeWitt, T. D., Garrett, T. J., Rees, K. N., Bois, C., Krueger, S. K., and Ferlay, N.: Climatologically invariant scale invariance seen in distributions of cloud horizontal sizes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 109–122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-109-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-109-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Diao et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Avallone, L. M., Paige, M. E., Beaton, S. P., Campos, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Cloud-scale ice-supersaturated regions spatially correlate with high water vapor heterogeneities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2639–2656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2639-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2639-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Florio et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Florio, B. J., Fawell, P. D., and Small, M.: The use of the perimeter-area
method to calculate the fractal dimension of aggregates, Powder Technol.,
343, 551–559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.030</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Fusina et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fusina, F., Spichtinger, P., and Lohmann, U.: Impact of ice supersaturated
regions and thin cirrus on radiation in the midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008449</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Gettelman et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gettelman, A., Fetzer, E. J., Eldering, A., and Irion, F. W.: The Global
Distribution of Supersaturation in the Upper Troposphere from the Atmospheric
Infrared Sounder, J. Climate, 19, 6089 – 6103,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3955.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3955.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Gierens and Spichtinger(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gierens, K. and Spichtinger, P.: On the size distribution of ice-supersaturated
regions in the upper troposphere and lowermost stratosphere, Ann.
Geophys., 18, 499–504,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2002/0011-0083" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2002/0011-0083</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Gotoh and Fujii(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gotoh, K. and Fujii, Y.: A fractal dimensional analysis on the cloud shape
parameters of cumulus over land, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37,
1283–1292, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037&lt;1283:AFDAOT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037&lt;1283:AFDAOT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Haywood et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haywood, J. M., Allan, R. P., Bornemann, J., Forster, P. M., Francis, P. N.,
Milton, S., Rädel, G., Rap, A., Shine, K. P., and Thorpe, R.: A case
study of the radiative forcing of persistent contrails evolving into
contrail-induced cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012650" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012650</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Held and Soden(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Held, I. M. and Soden, B. J.: Water vapor feedback and global warming, Annu.
Rev. Energ. Environ., 25, 441–475,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.441" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.441</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz‐Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M.,
Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.: The ERA5 global
reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146,
1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020 (data available at: <a href="https://apps.ecmwf.int/data-catalogues/era5/?class=ea" target="_blank"/>, last access: 20 June 2024).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Imre(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Imre, A.: Artificial fractal dimension obtained by using perimeter-area
relationship on digitalized images, Appl. Math. Comput., 173,
443–449, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.042</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Joseph and Cahalan(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Joseph, J. and Cahalan, R.: Nearest Neighbor Spacing of Fair Weather Cumulus
Clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol., 29, 793–805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029&lt;0793:NNSOFW&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029&lt;0793:NNSOFW&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Klinkenberg(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Klinkenberg, B.: A review of methods used to determine the fractal dimension of
linear features, Math. Geol., 26, 23–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065874" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065874</a>,
1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Köhler et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Köhler, D., Reutter, P., and Spichtinger, P.: Relative humidity over ice as a key variable for Northern Hemisphere midlatitude tropopause inversion layers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10055–10072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10055-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10055-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Krämer et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Lamquin et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lamquin, N., Stubenrauch, C. J., Gierens, K., Burkhardt, U., and Smit, H.: A global climatology of upper-tropospheric ice supersaturation occurrence inferred from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder calibrated by MOZAIC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 381–405, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-381-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-381-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Lee et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, D., Pitari, G., Grewe, V., Gierens, K., Penner, J., Petzold, A., Prather,
M., Schumann, U., Bais, A., Berntsen, T., Iachetti, D., Lim, L., and Sausen,
R.: Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Aviation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 4678–4734,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.005</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Lee et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, D., Fahey, D., Skowron, A., Allen, M., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty,
S., Freeman, S., Forster, P., Fuglestvedt, J., Gettelman, A., De León, R.,
Lim, L., Lund, M., Millar, R., Owen, B., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Prather, M.,
Sausen, R., and Wilcox, L.: The contribution of global aviation to
anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018, Atmos. Environ., 244,
117834, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Lovejoy(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lovejoy, S.: Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas, Science, 216,
185–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.216.4542.185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.216.4542.185</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Lovejoy and Mandelbrot(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lovejoy, S. and Mandelbrot, B. B.: Fractal properties of rain, and a fractal
model, Tellus A, 37A, 209–232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.1985.tb00423.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.1985.tb00423.x</a>,
1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Mandelbrot(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mandelbrot, B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W. H. Freeman and Co., ISBN
0-7167-1186-9, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Mandelbrot et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mandelbrot, B. B., Passoja, D. E., and Paullay, A. J.: Fractal character of
fracture surfaces of metals, Nature, 308, 721–722, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/308721a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/308721a0</a>,
1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Marenco et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marenco, A., Thouret, V., Nédélec, P., Smit, H., Helten, M., Kley, D., Karcher, F., Simon, P., Law, K., Pyle, J., Poschmann, G., von Wrede, R., Hume, C., and Cook, T.: Measurement of ozone and
water vapor by Airbus in-service aircraft: The MOZAIC airborne program, An
overview, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103,
25631–25642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00977" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00977</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Murphy and Koop(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murphy, D. M. and Koop, T.: Review of the vapour pressures of ice and
supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1539–1565, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.94" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.94</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Peitgen et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peitgen, H.-O., Jürgens, H., and Saupe, D.: Chaos and fractals – new frontiers
of science, 2nd edn., Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-20229-7, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/b97624" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/b97624</a>,
2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Petzold et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petzold, A., Thouret, V., Gerbig, C., Zahn, A., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Gallagher, M., Hermann, M., Pontaud, M., Ziereis, H., Boulanger, D.,
Marshall, J., Nédélec, P., Smit, H. G. J., Friess, U., Flaud, J.-M.,
Wahner, A., Cammas, J.-P., Volz-Thomas, A., and Team, I.: Global-scale
atmosphere monitoring by in-service aircraft–current achievements and future
prospects of the European Research Infrastructure IAGOS, Tellus B, 67, 28452, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28452" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28452</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Petzold et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petzold, A., Neis, P., Rütimann, M., Rohs, S., Berkes, F., Smit, H. G. J., Krämer, M., Spelten, N., Spichtinger, P., Nédélec, P., and Wahner, A.: Ice-supersaturated air masses in the northern mid-latitudes from regular in situ observations by passenger aircraft: vertical distribution, seasonality and tropospheric fingerprint, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8157–8179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8157-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8157-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Petzold et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petzold, A., Khan, N. F., Li, Y., Spichtinger, P., Rohs, S., Crewell, S.,
Wahner, A., and Kramer, M.: Most long-lived contrails form within cirrus
clouds with uncertain climate impact, Nat. Commun., 16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65532-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65532-2</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Rees et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rees, K. N., Garrett, T. J., DeWitt, T. D., Bois, C., Krueger, S. K., and Riedi, J. C.: A global analysis of the fractal properties of clouds revealing anisotropy of turbulence across scales, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 497–513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-497-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-497-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Reutter et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Reutter, P., Neis, P., Rohs, S., and Sauvage, B.: Ice supersaturated regions: properties and validation of ERA-Interim reanalysis with IAGOS in situ water vapour measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 787–804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-787-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-787-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Richardson(1926)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Richardson, L. F.: Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a
Mathematical and Physical Character, 110, 709–737,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1926.0043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1926.0043</a>, 1926.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Rys and Waldvogel(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rys, F. and Waldvogel, A.: Fractal Shape Of Hail Clouds, Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 784–787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.784" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.784</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Sakellariou et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sakellariou, M., Nakos, B., and Mitsakaki, C.: On the fractal character of rock
surfaces, in: International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences &amp;
geomechanics abstracts, vol. 28, 527–533, Pergamon,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(91)91129-F" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(91)91129-F</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Sanchez et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sanchez, N., Alfaro, E., and Pérez, E.: The fractal dimension of projected
clouds, Astrophys. J., 625, 849–856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/429553" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/429553</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Schuh(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schuh, H. Z.: hzschuh/Fractal_Paper: Fractal Characteristics of Ice-Supersaturated Regions in the Tropopause Region of the northern midlatitudes (Version fractal_code_v1), Zenodo [software], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21158240" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21158240</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Schumann(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schumann, U.: On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts,
Meteorol. Z., 5, 4–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/5/1996/4</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Siebesma and Jonker(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Siebesma, A. and Jonker, H.: Anomalous scaling of cumulus cloud boundaries,
Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 214–217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.214" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.214</a>,
2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Snow et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Snow, A. D., Whitaker, J., Cochran, M., Miara, I., den Bossche, J. V., Mayo,
C., Lucas, G., Cochrane, P., de Kloe, J., Karney, C., Shaw, J. J., Anh,
T. Q., Filipe, Ouzounoudis, G., Dearing, J., Lostis, G., Couwenberg, B.,
Hoese, D., de Bittencourt, H., Little, B., May, R., Itkin, M., McDonald, D.,
Schneck, C., Gohlke, C., Jurd, B., Raspaud, M., Brett, M., and Meulien, M.:
pyproj4/pyproj: 3.7.1 Release, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14876934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14876934</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Spichtinger and Leschner(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spichtinger, P. and Leschner, M.: Horizontal scales of ice-supersaturated
regions, Tellus B, 68, 29020,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v68.29020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v68.29020</a>, 2016.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Spichtinger et al.(2003a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spichtinger, P., Gierens, K., Leiterer, U., and Dier, H.: Ice supersaturation
in the tropopause region over Lindenberg, Germany, Meteorol. Z., 12, 143–156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2003/0012-0143" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2003/0012-0143</a>,
2003a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Spichtinger et al.(2003b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spichtinger, P., Gierens, K., and Read, W.: The global distribution of
ice-supersaturated regions as seen by the Microwave Limb Sounder, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 3391–3410,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.141" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.141</a>, 2003b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Spichtinger et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spichtinger, P., Gierens, K., Smit, H. G. J., Ovarlez, J., and Gayet, J.-F.: On the distribution of relative humidity in cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 639–647, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-639-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-639-2004</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Sreenivasan(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sreenivasan, K.: Fractals And Multifractals In Fluid Turbulence, Annual Rev. Fluid Mech., 23, 539,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.002543" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.002543</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Sreenivasan and Meneveau(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sreenivasan, K. and Meneveau, C.: The fractal facets of turbulence, J.
Fluid Mech., 173, 357–386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112086001209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112086001209</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Stuber et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stuber, N., Forster, P., Rädel, G., and Shine, K.: The importance of the
diurnal and annual cycle of air traffic for contrail radiative forcing,
Nature, 441, 864–867, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04877" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04877</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Vogelaar and Wakker(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogelaar, M. and Wakker, B.: Measuring the fractal structure of interstellar
clouds, Astron. Astrophys., 291,
557–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3384-5_90" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3384-5_90</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>von Savigny et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
von Savigny, C., Brinkhoff, L. A., Bailey, S. M., Randall, C. E., and
Russell III, J. M.: First determination of the fractal perimeter dimension of
noctilucent clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045834</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Wegener(1910)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wegener, A.: Über die Eisphase des Wasserdampfes in der Atmosphäre (On the
ice phase of water vapor in the atmosphere), Meteor. Z., 27, 451–459, 1910.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Wegener(1911)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wegener, A.: Thermodynamik der Atmosphäre, J. A. Barth, Leipzig,
<a href="https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_kWtUAAAAMAAJ" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 August 2026), 1911.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
