<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-10979-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Confirming the minimal role of in-atmosphere production on the global HFC-23 budget using a 3D chemical and transport model</article-title><alt-title>HFC-23 in-atmosphere production</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Adam</surname><given-names>Ben</given-names></name>
          <email>benjamin.adam@bristol.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9060-0612</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Holland</surname><given-names>Rayne</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Van Hoomissen</surname><given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Burkholder</surname><given-names>James B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>M. Anwar H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7836-3344</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Griffiths</surname><given-names>Paul</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-340X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Mühle</surname><given-names>Jens</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9776-3642</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Shallcross</surname><given-names>Dudley</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rigby</surname><given-names>Matt</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-9253</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Chemical Sciences Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3328, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA  92093-0244, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ben Adam (benjamin.adam@bristol.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>10979</fpage><lpage>10996</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>5</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Ben Adam et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10979/2026/acp-26-10979-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10979/2026/acp-26-10979-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10979/2026/acp-26-10979-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10979/2026/acp-26-10979-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e169">A large discrepancy of at least 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exists between reported emissions of the potent greenhouse gas HFC-23 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, trifluoromethane) and emissions derived from atmospheric measurements. In-atmosphere production of HFC-23 from the breakdown of fluorinated source gases such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs) contributes to this gap, but only a conservative upper limit has been estimated for the magnitude of this source. This uncertainty is due, in part, to limited experimental measurements of the photolysis quantum yield of trifluoroacetaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a key degradation product that forms HFC-23 via photolysis. The parameters governing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition are also poorly understood. Here, we use a 3D chemistry and transport model, STOCHEM-CRI, to further constrain the magnitude of in-atmosphere HFC-23 production, using recent estimates of source gas emissions and explicitly parametrised photolysis and deposition. Furthermore, we perform an ensemble of simulations to account for the uncertainties in these values. We find that in-atmosphere production of HFC-23 is in the range 0.013–0.035 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, substantially lower than previous estimates. This accounts for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 % of the discrepancy between reported and measurement-derived emissions, suggesting that this source makes a negligible contribution to the overall HFC-23 budget and that unreported direct emissions are likely responsible for the vast majority of the discrepancy. As part of this work, we also calculate indirect global warming potentials for the HFC-23 source gases HFO-1234ze(E), HFO-1336mzz(Z) and HCFO-1233zd(E) and find that their impact on climate is up to ten times higher than previously reported.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Natural Environment Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>NE/S007504/1</award-id>
<award-id>NE/X00452X/1</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e260">HFC-23 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, trifluoromethane) is a potent greenhouse gas, with an atmospheric lifetime of 228 years and a global warming potential (GWP) of 14 700 over the 100-year time horizon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.1"/>. Emissions of this gas are controlled under the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.2"/>, which seeks to limit its release to the atmosphere in order to reduce its impact on global radiative forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.3"/>. The Kigali Amendment requires Parties to destroy emissions of HFC-23 “to the extent practicable” when it is generated during production of other hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). The dominant source of HFC-23 in the atmosphere is believed to be its emission as a by-product during HCFC-22 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHClF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, chlorodifluoromethane) production from chloroform (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Global HFC-23 emissions from HCFC-22 production have been reported as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since 2018 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e333">The use of HFC-23 is limited to applications in semiconductor etching, fire suppression, low-temperature refrigeration, and as a feedstock in the production of halon-1301 (bromotrifluoromethane, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CBrF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.5"/>. Emissions of HFC-23 from these sources is estimated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> globally <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.6"/>, a figure orders of magnitude lower than emissions of the other major HFCs with dispersive uses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.7"/>. Recently, the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.8"/> estimated total emissions of HFC-23 by combining reported emissions from HCFC-22 production and emissive end-uses with information about other potential sources of HFC-23, such as fluoropolymer manufacture, HCFC-22 plant waste streams and other fluorochemical manufacturing, that are not reported under the Kigali Amendment. They found that the emissions from all known sources was expected to be in the range 1.6–3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2024.</p>
      <p id="d2e401">In the last decade, global “top-down” emission estimates, derived using atmospheric measurements, have consistently exceeded reported emissions by over 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, “top-down” emission estimates averaged over 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the period 2018–2023, while in that same period reported emissions, which assumed that national abatement policies were effectively implemented, were only in the range 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.9"/>. Even when comparing the top-down emissions (14.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2023) to the upper limit of the TEAP's estimates of emissions from all known sources, the discrepancy is still greater than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.10"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e502">In addition to the industrial sources mentioned above, it has been suggested that another source of HFC-23 may be its in-situ production in the atmosphere from the breakdown of other fluorinated source gases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.11"/>. The potential source gases include a number of atmospherically abundant HFCs along with various hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs) and hydrochlorofluoroolefins (HCFOs). HFOs are fourth-generation refrigerants and foam-blowing agents, slated to replace HFCs (which in turn replaced chlorofluorocarbons, CFCs) due to their reduced impact on stratospheric ozone and climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.12"/>. The carbon-carbon double bond in HFOs increases their reactivity towards oxidants such as the hydroxyl radical (OH), significantly reducing their atmospheric lifetimes relative to their saturated HFC predecessors. Consequently, GWPs of HFOs are generally small (often <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5) and far lower than HFCs and HCFCs. This fact coupled with their low atmospheric abundance implies that HFOs make a negligible contribution to global radiative forcing.</p>
      <p id="d2e519">Two pathways for the in-atmosphere production of HFC-23 from HFC and HFO source gases have been studied. Firstly, HFC-23 is produced as a minor product in the UV photolysis of trifluoroacetaldehyde, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.13"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the major product of the reaction of a number of fluorinated trace gases with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.14"/>. Studies have shown that the yield of HFC-23 from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UV photolysis at tropospherically relevant wavelengths is small but potentially significant. Secondly, direct formation of HFC-23 has been detected and quantified during the reactions of HFO-1234ze(E) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.15"/>, HFO-1336mzz(Z) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.16"/> and HCFO-1233zd(E) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.17"/> with ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A recent study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.18"/> estimated the maximum contribution of in-atmosphere production to HFC-23 emissions, using: measurements of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis quantum yield; estimated partial atmospheric loss lifetimes from the literature; globally averaged values for the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; global mean abundances for the relevant long-lived species; and HFO abundances from a monitoring station in Europe. They estimated an upper-limit for the global in-atmosphere HFC-23 production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.215 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, considering eight abundant fluorinated species that lead to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production. This value was intended to be a conservative upper-limit with the intention of informing policy, and assumed that UV photolysis accounted for 75 % of the atmospheric loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. That study did not explicitly parameterise other <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss processes such as reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and both wet and dry deposition. Nonetheless, it provides the most recent upper-limit estimate of the contribution of in-atmosphere production to global HFC-23 emissions to date. This would suggest that in-atmosphere production of HFC-23 does not drive the difference between reported and inferred HFC-23 emissions globally, as it leaves over 95 % of the discrepancy unaccounted for. However, further constraining this source is crucial in understanding the overall HFC-23 budget and establishing a solid evidence base for environmental policy.</p>
      <p id="d2e704">Since the publication of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.19"/>, there has been further discussion of the physical properties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its fate in the troposphere, particularly in relation to the balance of heterogeneous loss processes against photolysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.20"/>. In addition, one recent modelling study explored the atmospheric fate and environmental impacts of one specific source gas, HFO-1234ze(E), and estimated very small in-atmosphere HFC-23 production using an alternative atmospheric chemistry and transport model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.21"/>. However, that study considered only one source gas for HFC-23, and so could only report a partial estimate for in-atmosphere production. In addition, given that no experimental data has been published to better constrain the physical properties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere, a range of modelling approaches are required to explore the uncertainties in these parameters.</p>
      <p id="d2e742">In this work, we use the 3D global chemical and transport model STOCHEM-CRI to investigate the in-atmosphere production of HFC-23 from seven fluorinated source gases. We explore the reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of four HFCs (HFC-143a, HFC-236fa, HFC-245fa and HFC-365mfc) and three HFOs/HCFOs (HFO-1234ze(E), HFO-1336mzz(Z) and HCFO-1233zd(E)) to produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the subsequent photolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to yield HFC-23. We also consider the direct production of HFC-23 via the reaction of those three HFOs with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We aim to comprehensively constrain the extent to which atmospheric breakdown of other fluorinated gases contributes to the global burden of HFC-23, and how much of the discrepancy between the reported and top-down emissions these processes can explain. Due to the absence of experimental data regarding the physical properties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the limited wavelength-dependent UV photolysis measurements and the limited information on HFO emissions globally, we conduct a sensitivity analysis exploring these physical and photochemical parameter uncertainties, as well as the relationship between the poorly constrained source gas emissions and HFC-23 production. This allows us to identify critical uncertainties in the in-atmosphere production of HFC-23, and place bounds on its contribution to the global budget. Finally, using results from the full 3D STOCHEM-CRI model simulation, we use a simple box model to provide updated estimates of the indirect global warming potentials of the HFC-23 source gases to reflect the additional impact on climate of their breakdown products.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>STOCHEM-CRI</title>
      <p id="d2e823">The 3D global chemical and transport model, STOchastic CHEMistry – Common Representative Intermediates (STOCHEM-CRI), was used to simulate the emissions, transport and chemical reactions of the various species under investigation. STOCHEM-CRI, and its preceding versions, has been used previously to model atmospheric trace gas species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.22"/>, including the fluorinated species HFO-1234yf <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.23"/> and perfluorooctanoic acid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.24"/>. The model transport is driven by archived meteorological data from the UK Meteorological Office, and adopts a Langrangian approach to advect air parcels in the troposphere. Further details of the transport and meteorology can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.25"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.26"/>. In this study, we simulated a full year (2023) of HFC-23 in-atmosphere production following an initial spin-up simulation, which was used to initialise the atmospheric conditions and then discarded.</p>
      <p id="d2e841">The model chemistry uses a reduced chemical Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.27"/> to which the chemical reactions, physical loss processes and emissions of the fluorinated source gases are added (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are calculated for each grid cell in the model based on emissions, kinetics and photolysis. Abundances of all species are calculated at three-hourly time steps. For non-fluorinated species (e.g., other selected VOCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), emissions were taken from the Precursor of Ozone and their Effects in the Troposphere (POET) inventory and physical removal processes such as wet and dry deposition were parametrized as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.28"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Source gases and emissions</title>
      <p id="d2e899">Several saturated fluorinated gases contain the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>- moeity required to produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upon reaction with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.29"/>. Of these, HFC-143a (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, tropospheric lifetime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>trop</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57.2 years), HFC-236fa (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>trop</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 253 years), HFC-245fa (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>trop</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.1 years) and HFC-365mfc (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>trop</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.3 years) have been measured in the global atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.30"/>. HCFC-133a (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Cl) is another species containing the relevant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>- moeity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.31"/>, but there is limited evidence to support the formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a quantifiable yield from the reaction of this species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.32"/> and so it is excluded from the present study. The rate coefficients and yields of the reactions of these HFCs with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are taken from the NASA/JPL recommended values <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.33"/>. In addition, three unsaturated fluorinated gases with measured atmospheric abundances have also been shown to react with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.34"/>. These species are HFO-1234ze(E) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">trans</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mtext>=</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHF</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>trop</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), HFO-1336mzz(Z) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">cis</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mtext>=</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>trop</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and HCFO-1233zd(E) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">trans</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mtext>=</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>trop</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These three species also react with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to produce HFC-23 directly. All rate coefficients and yields for included reactions are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1353">Chemical reactions added into STOCHEM-CRI, with their rate constants and product yields.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">reaction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">product</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">product yield/%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">references</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(rate coefficient, yield)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-143a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−12</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>a,b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-236fa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−12</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2500</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>a,b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-245fa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−12</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1330</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>a,b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-365mfc <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−12</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1660</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>a,b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1234ze(E) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−13</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>a,b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1336mzz(Z) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−13</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>a,b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HCFO-1233zd(E) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−13</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">280</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>a,b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1234ze(E) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HFC-23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−21</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>c,c</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1336mzz(Z) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HFC-23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−22</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>d,d</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HCFO-1233zd(E) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HFC-23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−21</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>e,e</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−13</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">131</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><sup>f,–</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e1356"><sup>a</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.35"/>. <sup>b</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.36"/>. <sup>c</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.37"/>. <sup>d</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.38"/>. <sup>e</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.39"/> <sup>f</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.40"/>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2488">For the four long-lived source gases (HFC-143a, HFC-236fa, HFC-245fa and HFC-365mfc), baseline mole fractions are taken from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE) network <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.41"/>. In the model runs, we initialise hemispheric average mole fractions for 2023 and prescribe global emissions for that same year from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.42"/>, as shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. The emissions for each of the HFCs are spatially distributed over the 5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5° surface grid used in STOCHEM according to the EDGAR v8.0 inventory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.43"/>. While these emissions estimates have uncertainties of up to 30 % (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), the reaction to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and subsequently HFC-23) is predominantly driven not by emissions but by the background mole fraction, which is better-constrained (typically on the order of a few percent; see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="altparen.44"/>). We therefore do not consider the uncertainties in HFC emissions in this analysis.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2537">Source gases used in the STOCHEM-CRI model, their tropospheric lifetimes taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.45"/>, and the emissions and northern (NH) and southern (SH) hemispheric background mole fractions used as model inputs. Suffices are used to distinguish structural isomers (see <uri>https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/standards-and-guidelines/ashrae-refrigerant-designations</uri>, last access: 30 July 2026).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropospheric Lifetime/years</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Emissions/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NH mole fraction/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SH mole fraction/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-143a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">57.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-236fa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">253</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-245fa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-365mfc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropospheric Lifetime/days</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Emissions/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NH mole fraction/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SH mole fraction/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1234ze(E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1336mzz(Z)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HCFO-1233zd(E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2791">The shorter lifetimes of the HFOs make them unsuitable for top-down emissions estimation with a global box model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.46"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, and no global 3D top-down inversion or bottom-up inventory of emissions is available, either. Therefore, we make several approximations in estimating the magnitude and spatial distribution of HFO emissions and carry out a wide range of tests (detailed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>) to explore the sensitivity of our results to these assumptions. Firstly, we assume that the adoption and emission of HFOs is correlated with national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) globally. Although it ignores the differing rates of transition from HFCs to HFOs in different regions, we use GDP as a proxy for emissions as it has been used previously to estimate demand for HFCs globally <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.47"/>. Previous work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.48"/> suggests this correlation is unlikely to hold globally, since phase-out of HFCs in favour of HFOs seems to be slower in areas such as East Asia than in Europe, where regulation of fluorinated species has accelerated this transition. However, in the absence of other suitable proxies, we take published HFO emissions for Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.49"/> and scale them up using national GDP totals to give global estimates. Emissions of HFO-1234ze(E) and HCFO-1233zd(E) were 0.96 and 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, in 2023 for Northwest Europe, a region defined as Ireland, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Belgium. These countries accounted for approximately 12.5 % of the global GDP for that year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.50"/>. Therefore, we scale these emissions up by a factor of 8 and use global emissions of 7.7 and 8.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for these two species, respectively, in the STOCHEM-CRI model. Despite concerns about overestimating emissions via this method, our estimates are approximately 50 % lower than those made by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.51"/>, who estimated global HFO-1234ze(E) emissions at 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2868">For HFO-1336mzz(Z), no recent emissions estimates are available. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.52"/> estimated Swiss emissions of HFO-1336mzz(Z) at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2019–2020. Swiss emissions of the other two HFOs considered in this model were also estimated for 2019–2020 at 34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HFO-1234ze(E)) and 7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HCFO-1233zd(E)) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.53"/>. Using a tracer ratio method and scaling up to global emissions, this suggests that HFO-1336mzz(Z) emissions are between 1.2 and 5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, depending on which HFO is used as a tracer. Here, we take a mean of these values and estimate global HFO-1336mzz(Z) emissions at 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We note that the use of the other HFOs as tracers for HFO-1336mzz(Z) emissions may not be reasonable, as evidenced by the large disparity in emissions when selecting alternative tracers. Nonetheless, in the absence of complete emission inventories derived from atmospheric measurements, we believe the wide range of sensitivity tests conducted here (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>) produce a sound order-of-magnitude estimate for global HFO emissions, sufficient to estimate the in-atmosphere production of HFC-23. We also note that the amount of HFC-23 produced by the in-atmosphere breakdown of HFOs is likely to be linearly dependent on the global emissions of each species, so if improved emission estimates were to become available, our totals could be scaled. We explore the extent to which this is true, as well as the effect of varying emissions totals, in the sensitivity analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e2965">The spatial distribution of the HFO emissions is also poorly constrained. In the absence of gridded emissions estimates, the emissions are distributed according to the method used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.54"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.55"/>. This takes the spatial distribution for HFC-134a emissions in the EDGAR database and replaces the emissions inventory from China using gridded estimates from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.56"/>. The impact of changing these spatial distributions and therefore releasing the HFOs into regions of varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, is investigated through a set of sensitivity tests outlined in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>. These tests also probe the validity of scaling up emissions by GDP.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Fate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>UV Photolysis</title>
      <p id="d2e3027">The loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leading to HFC-23 formation occurs via UV photolysis, for which multiple pathways are possible:</p>
      <p id="d2e3043"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (367 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 326 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (a)</p>
      <p id="d2e3148"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (325 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 368 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (b)</p>
      <p id="d2e3221"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (377 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 318 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (c)</p>
      <p id="d2e3295"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (403 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 304 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (d)</p>
      <p id="d2e3381"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HF</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 374 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (e) where the quoted photolysis energy thresholds are taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.57"/>. Pathway (a) yields <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCO radicals and dominates in the troposphere. Pathway (b) yields HFC-23 and carbon monoxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), making it of particular interest in this work. Pathways (c), (d) and (e) are thought to be minor tropospheric photolysis pathways and are not considered here.</p>
      <p id="d2e3492"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantum yields and HFC-23 product yields have been reported at discrete wavelengths in recent studes: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.58"/> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 254 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.59"/> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 308 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.60"/> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 248, 266, 281 and 308 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.61"/> also carried out broadband photolysis measurements, in the wavelength range 290–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this study, an empirical method was used to estimate the photolysis quantum yield for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the product yield for HFC-23 formation for wavelengths between 266 and 360 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the experimental data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.62"/>. Wavelength and pressure-dependent quantum yields for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and product yields for HFC-23 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PY</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>HFC-23</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were calculated using the empirical relationships given in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the wavelength in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ND denotes the number density of the air in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M245" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">266</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.951</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ND</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0192</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>ND</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">266</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">266</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">280</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ND</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0656</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">360</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">281</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">360</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="normal">PY</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>HFC-23</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">266</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9999999</mml:mn><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">272</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ND</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">266</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">360</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4023">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis quantum yield and the HFC-23 product yield are plotted as functions of wavelength in Fig. 1.</p>
      <p id="d2e4039">To investigate the sensitivity of the modelled HFC-23 production to uncertainties in the photolysis parametrisations, we carried out two further model runs, “Phot_Hi” and “Phot_Low”, in addition to the base case (see Sect. 2.4). In the “Phot_Hi” run, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantum yield for pathway (b) is fixed to its low-pressure limit, giving an upper-limit to the HFC-23 production from the photolysis. This low-pressure limit is defined as the pressure at the highest vertical level of the model. Similarly, in the “Phot_Low” run, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantum yield for pathway (b) is set to a high-pressure limit, defined as the pressure at the lowest vertical level of the model. The product yield is still allowed to vary with pressure, although <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.63"/> showed only a small pressure dependence at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 308 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and our parametrisation reflects this.</p>
      <p id="d2e4094">At every timestep, STOCHEM-CRI calculates the photolysis rates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for pathways (a) and (b), respectively from the quantum and product yields, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption spectrum and actinic flux according to the relationship:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M255" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PY</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>HFC-23</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PY</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>HFC-23</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantum yield at wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PY</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>HFC-23</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the product yield for HFC-23 at wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absorption cross-section at wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.64"><named-content content-type="pre">taken from</named-content></xref>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the actinic flux at the relevant altitude. Details on the photolysis scheme of the model, including the calculation of actinic flux, can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.65"/>. The number density, ND, at every model height is also output at every timestep and used in the quantum and product yield calculations. In practice, this integral is computed by summing over 106 wavelength intervals between 200 and 660 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, although the quantum yield is set to zero for values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 360 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The absorption cross-section is assumed to be temperature-independent. As a result, a sensitivity study is carried out to determine the impact on HFC-23 production of increasing and decreasing the values of the absorption cross-section by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % (runs “AXS_Hi” and “AXS_Low”), approximately the uncertainty in the published values of the cross-section reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.66"/>. The discrete absorption cross-section values are linearly interpolated to the midpoint of the wavelength intervals, which are approximately linearly spaced at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals in the wavelength range. The quantum and product yields are calculated directly from these midpoints using Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). The absorption cross-section used in the model is plotted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>, along with a typical actinic flux at the surface. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> also shows a typical profile of the integrands in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) with wavelength, and suggests that photolysis pathway (a) peaks at approximately 315 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with roughly 87 % of photolysis via this pathway occurring between 305 and 335 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Pathway (b) operates at lower wavelengths, with a peak at approximately 310 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface. Roughly 85 % of photolysis via this pathway occurs at wavelengths between 300 and 320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e4524"><bold>(a)</bold> Variation with wavelength of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis quantum yield in the model, according to Eq. (1). The dashed line shows the quantum yield calculated at the highest pressure in the model, while the dotted line shows the quantum yield at the lowest pressure in the model. These are also the pressures used in the “Phot_Hi” and “Phot_Low” scenarios. The quantum yield is set to 1.0 for wavelengths below 266 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0 for wavelengths longer than 36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> Variation with wavelength of the photolysis product yield for HFC-23. Pathway (a), producing radicals, is shown in red and is calculated as one minus the HFC-23 product yield, while the HFC-23 product yield (pathway (b)) is shown in blue. While this quantity varies slightly with pressure, this is insignificant and not shown here. <bold>(c)</bold> Variation with wavelength of the absorption cross-section of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (solid line) and typical surface actinic flux (dashed line) used in the model. <bold>(d)</bold> Contribution of each wavelength to the overall photolysis rate at the surface for pathways (a) and (b), shown in red and blue, respectively. The contribution of pathway (b) is shown at 100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> enlargement. This is calculated as the product of the quantum and product yields, the absorption cross-section and actinic flux. The area under each of the lines corresponds to the overall photolysis rate, as per Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10979/2026/acp-26-10979-2026-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e4598">The three photolysis scenarios are summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>, alongside typical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis lifetimes calculated at the highest (912–1013 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and lowest (100–201 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) pressure levels in STOCHEM-CRI.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4635"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis scenarios explored in this study, with the typical photolysis lifetimes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated by the model at the surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>surface</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and at the highest vertical level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>top</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Although the quantum yield treatment is the same at all pressure levels in both the “Phot_Hi” and “Phot_Low” scenarios, differences between the surface and top of the model arise due to differing actinic fluxes.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="25mm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">scenario</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">product yield treatment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>surface</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/days</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>top</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/days</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Phot_Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">high-pressure limit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">parametrized withpressure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Phot_Hi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">low-pressure limit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Chemical and physical loss processes</title>
      <p id="d2e4795">Several reactions and loss pathways of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that compete with UV photolysis were included in the model. Firstly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical to produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which does not go on to form HFC-23 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.67"/>. The temperature-dependent rate constant for this process is taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.68"/> and is shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>. In addition to the reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, our model also considers loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through dry and wet deposition. Dry deposition is parametrized in STOCHEM using a deposition velocity, for which values over land and sea can be specified. A previous study estimated the global average dry deposition velocity to be between 0.007 and 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the GEOS-Chem model with acetaldehyde as a proxy for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.69"/>. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.70"/> note that for compounds with similar Henry's Law solubility coefficients to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mean dry deposition values can be higher than this. In the absence of any further estimates, we take the dry deposition velocity to be 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over both land and sea. The effect on HFC-23 production of deposition velocities between 0.001 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is explored in the sensitivity analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e4959">Wet deposition is parametrized using dynamic and convective scavenging coefficients (DSC and CSC) for each species. These cannot be measured directly and have not been published for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We estimate these parameters based on previously published values of scavenging coefficients for soluble species, which lie between 0.0 and 5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.71"/>, and in the absence of further information set both the DSC and CSC for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the model. Another measure of the uptake of a gaseous compound into water, the Henry's Law solubility coefficient, has been heavily debated for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and estimates range from 0.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the lower value used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="altparen.72"/>) to 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>4</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the suggested value of the effective Henry's Law coefficient in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="altparen.73"/>). Given the spread of these estimates, any value chosen for the DSC and CSC is subject to large uncertainty, and so we explore the impact of varying this parameter between 1.0 and 10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the sensitivity analysis (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e5106">Extension of the range of deposition parameters to “extreme” upper limits intends to test the entire theoretical range of deposition behaviour. In doing so, our ensembles capture the full range of influence that uncertainty in these parameters can have on the atmospheric fate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and, therefore, improves the constraint on these highly uncertain processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e5122">It has been suggested that the in-cloud hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may represent a further loss process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.74"/>. However, there is insufficient published experimental data to represent this in STOCHEM-CRI, and so this process has not been included in this study. In addition, the impact of including another loss process would likely be to reduce the atmospheric burden of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, making the estimates of HFC-23 production presented in this work a likely upper bound.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Sensitivity analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e5163">A “base” run was established for the sensitivity analysis, with the photolysis scheme set out as above (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1"/>) and total HFO emissions of 19.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HFO-1234ze(E), 8.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HCFO-1233zd(E) and 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HFO-1336mzz(Z) as derived in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>). Dry deposition velocities over both land and sea were set to 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and dynamic and convective scavenging coefficients to 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5270">Starting from this “base” scenario, nineteen further runs were performed, to explore the loss processes that are poorly constrained by experimental data. Firstly, the effect of changing photolysis setup between the three scenarios “base”, “Phot_Low” and “Phot_Hi” was assessed, as well as a pair of runs (“AXS_Hi” and “AXS_Low”) assessing the impact of increasing or decreasing the absorption cross-section of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Secondly, we varied the emissions of the three HFOs considered in this model, increasing and decreasing emissions by a factor of three relative to the values outlined above to give “Em_Low” and “Em_Hi” runs. We also performed runs in which we varied the spatial distribution of HFO emissions, while keeping the magnitude constant. These explored the impact of distributing global emissions uniformly across the land and sea (“Dist_flatlandsea”), uniformly across the land only (“Dist_flatland”), in a zonal band at the equator (between 30° N and 30° S, run “Dist_equator”), and in two bands at the poles (latitudes greater than 60° N/S, run “Dist_polar”). This was done to explore how releasing the fluorinated source gases into regions of high and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations would impact their breakdown, and these are not presented as plausible emissions distributions. Thirdly, a set of runs was carried out to assess the impact of changing the dry deposition velocity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition to the base run with a dry deposition velocity of 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, further runs were performed with dry deposition velocities of 0.001 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (“Dep_0.001”), 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (“Dep_0.1”), 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (“Dep_1”) and 10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (“Dep_10”). The higher dry deposition scenarios enable the exploration of deposition rates in the range of values proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.75"/> The impact of changing the convective and dynamic scavenging coefficients, which parametrise wet deposition in the model, was also investigated. While the base runs set this parameter at 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we also ran further simulations with the coefficients set to 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (“Scav_1”), 5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (“Scav_5”), 7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (“Scav_7”) and 10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (“Scav_10”). These values span the full range of scavenging coefficients tabulated for common species in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.76"/> (1.0 to 5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and extend to higher scavenging coefficients to fully explore the impacts of even higher rates of wet deposition. Finally, a single run (“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>”) was performed to explore the impact of including the reversible reaction between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical, which has been suggested as a potential additional sink for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere. This model run incorporates the forward (2.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−13</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and reverse (1.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>3</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) rate constants derived from theoretical calculations taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.77"/>. This run was compared to the “base” scenario, to assess the impact of this reaction of HFC-23 production.</p>
      <p id="d2e5625">Full details of all sensitivity analysis runs can be found in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e5634">List of all model runs in the sensitivity study and the parameters used. The columns show the quantum yield parametrization (photolysis), the dry deposition velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the convective and dynamic scavenging coefficients (SC), total HFO emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HFO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and their spatial distribution (spatial distribution), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption cross section (AXS) and whether or not the reversible reaction between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was included (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The JPL cross-section can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.78"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">run</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">photolysis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SC/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HFO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">spatial distribution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">AXS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Phot_Hi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PhotHi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Phot_Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PhotLow</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Em_Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Em_Hi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">57.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scav_1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scav_5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scav_7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scav_10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dep_0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dep_0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dep_1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dep_10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dist_flatland</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">uniform over land only</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dist_flatlandsea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">uniform over land and sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dist_polar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">uniform at latitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60° N/S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dist_equator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">uniform at latitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30° N/S</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AXS_Hi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AXS_Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">modified EDGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">JPL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Yes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Global Warming Potentials</title>
      <p id="d2e6450">Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) quantify the climate impact of a greenhouse gas species, by comparing the time-integrated radiative forcing of a single pulse of emissions to that of carbon dioxide, over a given time horizon (typically 20, 100 and 500 years). The lifetime of the species relative to the time horizon is an important factor in determining the GWP. For example, short-lived species such as HFOs typically have very small GWPs, since their breakdown on timescales far shorter than the time horizon means that their time-integrated radiative impact is much smaller than species with longer lifetimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.79"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6456">Generally, only the radiative impact of the single species is considered in such calculations, and not the impact of any breakdown products. However, for gases that breakdown to form long-lived, radiatively active species such as HFC-23, the indirect GWP may need to be considered, incorporating both the source gas's radiative impact and that of its breakdown products. This has been done previously for various HFOs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.80"/>, considering only their ozonolysis, and for some of the HFOs that break down to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.81"/>. A similar approach has been taken for chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as well, due to the negative radiative forcing resulting from their ability to deplete stratospheric ozone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.82"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6481">We calculated indirect GWPs for each of the eight source gases considered here. These were derived by assimilating the rates and yields of reactions contributing to the in-atmosphere HFC-23 production into a simple one-box model of the atmosphere. This model tracks the abundances of the relevant gas species over time according to a simple kinetic scheme, but is otherwise static with respect to atmospheric conditions. The reactions of each source gas with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were simulated, using the same rate constants as in the STOCHEM-CRI model (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). A uniform temperature in the box model of 265 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was chosen to most accurately simulate the tropospheric lifetimes of the source gases. The concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals in the box model was set at 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the HFOs, the loss via reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also simulated, with the same (temperature-independent) rate constants as in the 3D model and a uniform <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. From each member of the STOCHEM-CRI ensemble of runs, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime and the fraction of the loss that yielded HFC-23 was extracted. Although the loss of HFC-23 in the STOCHEM-CRI model is negligible due to its long lifetime relative to the one-year simulations, the reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also incorporated into the kinetic scheme here, tuned such that HFC-23 had a tropospheric lifetime of 243 years (ignoring stratospheric loss) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.83"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6573">To determine the indirect GWPs, a 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pulse of emissions was emitted at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 for each source gas species independently. The evolution of HFC-23 over time was tracked over time periods of 20, 100 or 500 years. This was integrated with respect to time and multiplied by the radiative forcing. To give an indirect global warming potential for each source gas due to the production of HFC-23, this was divided by the equivalent time-integrated radiative forcing for an equivalent pulse of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.84"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e6621">Here, we report global in-atmosphere HFC-23 production from each of the model runs, assess how varying the parameters in STOCHEM-CRI impacts these values, and finally, calculate indirect global warming potentials for each of the source gas species due to their breakdown to HFC-23.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>HFC-23 production</title>
      <p id="d2e6632">Across the twenty model scenarios, total HFC-23 production ranged from 0.013 to 0.035 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with all but two of the runs yielding HFC-23 production rates between 0.016 and 0.022 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The factors influencing HFC-23 production are discussed below. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>a illustrates that the main source of HFC-23 in these model runs comes from the photolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the remaining production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 % in all cases) coming from ozonolysis reactions. The absolute contribution from ozonolysis is similar for most runs, since most of the parameters investigated do not significantly impact that reaction pathway. However, differences in HFC-23 produced from ozonolysis are seen when the spatial distribution of HFO emissions is changed, and this is discussed below. Previous work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.85"/> put the contribution of ozonolysis reactions at 4 % of the total production, with photolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yielding the remaining 96 %. Our results suggest a slightly larger relative contribution, with ozonolysis contributing between 5 % and 17 % of the total HFC-23 production and a mean contribution of 11 % across the twenty runs.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e6710"><bold>(a)</bold> Annually averaged in-atmosphere production of HFC-23 under all scenarios in the sensitivity analysis (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>). The darker bars show the contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis to HFC-23 production, while the lighter bars show the ozonolysis contribution. The dashed vertical grey line indicates the HFC-23 production in the “base” scenario and acts as a guide to the eye for comparison of other runs. <bold>(b)</bold> Percentage contribution of the five processes in the model (photolysis pathways (a) and (b), reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, wet and dry deposition) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss in each STOCHEM run.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10979/2026/acp-26-10979-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6760">These results are an order of magnitude lower than than the previous estimate of in-atmosphere HFC-23 production by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.86"/>, who estimated global emissions of 0.215 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from photochemical sources for 2022. That value, however, was calculated as an conservative upper bound and so is consistent with the results presented here. These results confirm that in-atmosphere HFC-23 production is likely negligible compared to the global emissions derived from atmospheric measurements. Modelled in-atmosphere production in this study was between 0.1 % and 0.25 % of the global emissions of 14.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> published for 2023 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.87"/>. While some parameters influencing HFC-23 production (such as deposition and in-cloud hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are poorly constrained by experimental data, these model runs were designed to capture a wide range of plausible values for the production of HFC-23. As a result, it is likely that the true contribution of in-atmosphere production to the global HFC-23 burden lies within this range.</p>
      <p id="d2e6817">These emissions lead to an increase in the global mean mole fraction of HFC-23 of roughly 0.001 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the model, in reasonable agreement with the value estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.88"/>. Not only is this value three orders of magnitude lower than the measured increase in global mean mole fraction (on the order 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), it is substantially lower than the precision of current measurement techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.89"/>. This means that even in the absence of industrial emissions, the production of HFC-23 in the atmosphere would be undetectable at present.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Factors affecting HFC-23 production</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Emissions</title>
      <p id="d2e6875">Comparison of the “Em_Hi” and “Em_Low” runs to the “base” scenario illustrates how HFC-23 production is influenced by HFO emissions (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>a). HFOs are not the only source gases considered in this model, but we believe that the emissions (and, crucially, the background mole fractions, which drive HFC-23 production) of the long-lived HFC species are much better constrained, and so we do not vary their emissions in this ensemble. The contribution of the long-lived HFC source gases to HFC-23 production is constant at approximately 0.010 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in all three emission scenarios, and the contribution of HFOs scales linearly with increasing emissions as expected. In our low emission scenario, HFOs contribute approximately 0.0027 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of HFC-23 (21 % of the total), whereas with our estimated upper bound for HFOs emissions they contribute 0.023 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (71 % of the total). As HFOs replace HFCs in the future in emissive applications due to HFC phase-down regulations, we would expect them to begin to dominate as source gases for HFC-23 production in the atmosphere. The contribution of each source gas and reaction to the total HFC-23 produced in the “base” scenario is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>, in which HFOs contribute 44 % of HFC-23 production and HFCs contribute 56 %. HFO-1234ze(E) and HCFO-1233zd(E) make the largest contributions of the HFOs investigated, while HFC-143a is the largest contributor of the long-lived species, followed by HFC-245fa and HFC-365mfc. The relative ordering of the contributions within the HFC species is consistent with results in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.90"/>, which used globally averaged abundances of source gases and oxidants, as well as fixed estimates of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial lifetime with respect to its loss processes, to estimate a conservative upper limit on HFC-23 production. In that study, the contribution from HFOs made up 80 % of the total HFC-23 production. This is a similar contribution to our “Em_Hi” scenario, in which HFOs contribute 71 % of HFC-23 production. Generation of HFC-23 from HFO-1234ze(E) can also be compared to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.91"/>, who reported 0.011 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While this is approximately three times larger than the amount of HFC-23 generated from HFO-1234ze(E) in this study, this can largely be explained by the higher emissions used in that study (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>). The remaining discrepancy is likely due to different treatments of the loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e6987">Plot of the contribution of each HFO reaction to in-atmosphere HFC-23 production in “base” scenario. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis pathway reactions are shown as solid bars, while the contribution from ozonolysis is shown as hatched bars. The reaction of HFC-236fa with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and that of HFO-1336mzz(Z) with ozone are not shown, as their contributions to total HFC-23 emissions are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 % of the total.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10979/2026/acp-26-10979-2026-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e7024">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5"/> shows the total HFC-23 generated (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from each of the three HFOs considered in the model, per <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of HFO emitted. The median and standard deviation for each species are obtained from the full ensemble of simulations. The median is used here to avoid introducing biases from the simulations testing extreme parametrisations.</p>

<table-wrap id="T5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d2e7049">Median yield of HFC-23 per mass of emissions of each of the three HFOs considered in this model, reported in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of HFC-23 per <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of source gas species with the standard deviation (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of this value across the twenty model runs.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ozonolysis/</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis/</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1234ze(E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1336mzz(Z)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HCFO-1233zd(E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e7235">These yields can be compared to those published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.92"/>, who report production of 790, 1100 and 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HFC-23 from photolysis per Gg source gas emission for HFO-1234ze(E), HFO-1336mzz(Z) and HCFO-1233zd(E), respectively. The corresponding reported values for ozonolysis of HFO-1234ze(E) and HFO-1336mzz(Z) are 78 and 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HFC-23 per <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source gas emission (HCFO-1233zd(E) is not reported in their study). For photolysis, our range of yields is significantly lower than the previously published values for all three species, and for ozonolysis, the published values also differ from those presented here. Our ozonolysis yield is 48 % greater than the published value for HFO-1234ze(E) and 39 % lower for HFO-1336mzz(Z). These discrepancies may be attributed to the more thorough treatment of the photochemical and physical behaviour of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in our model, as well as the more detailed three-dimensional transport scheme, compared to the calculation in the previous study. Our model also uses an updated value for the HFC-23 yield from HFO-1234ze(E) ozonolysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.93"/>, which explains the increased yield for that species.</p>
      <p id="d2e7282">The linearity of HFC-23 production with respect to HFO emissions allows our estimates of in-atmosphere HFC-23 production to be updated, should better estimates of HFO emissions become available. Yield calculations are not performed for the HFC source gases considered in this study, since their longer lifetimes mean that their contribution to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden varies over time and is dependent on both the background mole fraction and the emission rate. However, the HFC-23 produced by a single “pulse” emission of these gases is estimated when calculating the indirect GDP of these species (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>) and is discussed below.</p>
      <p id="d2e7300">We find that the spatial distribution of emissions has a minimal impact on the total HFC-23 production. Relative to the “base” runs, where HFO emissions were distributed according to a modified version of the EDGAR HFC-134a inventory, running with emissions evenly distributed over the earth's surface, or over the land only, increased the HFC-23 production by roughly 5 %. Similarly, placing all the emissions at the equator or at the poles increased HFC-23 production by 3 % and 6 %, respectively. In the “Dist_equator” scenario, we would expect less ozonolysis due to the lower ozone concentrations at lower latitudes, and vice versa for the “Dist_polar” scenario. This is borne out by the results as seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>, although it appears that changes in the photolysis and ozonolysis pathways largely cancelled each other out between the different spatial distributions of emissions. Overall, this suggests that the assumptions we make in spatially distributing HFO emissions in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/> do not have a significant impact on the overall HFC-23 production in the model. The impact of these different emissions scenarios on the spatial distribution of HFC-23 production is shown in Fig. S1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>UV Photolysis</title>
      <p id="d2e7315">The sensitivity analysis explores the impact of changing the quantum yield of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to its high- and low-pressure limits. We find that these limits have a modest impact on the overall HFC-23 production in the model, with the “Phot_Hi” scenario increasing HFC-23 production by 18 % and the “Phot_Low” scenario decreasing HFC-23 production by 9 %. Increasing or decreasing the absorption cross-section of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the model had a smaller impact, changing the HFC-23 production by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> suggests that uncertainties in photolysis parameters make a similar contribution to uncertainties in the deposition parameters in terms of their overall contribution to the uncertainty in HFC-23 production in the atmosphere. While more measurements of these parameters (namely quantum and product yields at different wavelengths and pressures, and absorption cross-sections at different temperatures) would help to constrain in-atmosphere HFC-23 production even further, existing uncertainties appear to be sufficiently small for meaningful conclusions about the role of in-atmosphere production in the HFC-23 budget to be drawn.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Wet and dry deposition</title>
      <p id="d2e7361">The impact of varying the wet and dry deposition parameters for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in STOCHEM-CRI was explored in a set of model runs that independently varied the scavenging coefficients (which govern wet deposition) and the deposition velocity (which governs dry deposition). Increasing the rate at which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is removed from the atmosphere via these processes would be expected to give a lower atmospheric burden, leading to less loss via photolysis and less HFC-23 production. It was found that varying these parameters did indeed have an impact on HFC-23 production. Increasing the dry deposition velocity across four orders of magnitude (from 0.001 to 10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decreased HFC-23 production by approximately 10 %, although dry deposition only became a significant loss process for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at dry deposition velocities of 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and higher, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b. Similarly, increasing the dynamic and convective scavenging coefficients by an order of magnitude (from 1.0 to 10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) decreased the quantity of HFC-23 produced by approximately 23 %. Investigation of the intermediate values of the scavenging coefficients suggests a non-linear relationship between scavenging coefficient and HFC-23 production. However, further increasing the value of the scavenging coefficients appears unlikely to substantially decrease the HFC-23 yield, as the deposition process becomes limited by other factors such as diffusion and/or precipitation rate.</p>
      <p id="d2e7454">By imposing dry deposition velocities ranging across four orders of magnitude in the model, we explore the full range of possibilities for a parameter poorly constrained by experimental data. The velocities explored are beyond what has been suggested as an upper limit for the deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over a continental surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.94"/>, and above the range modelled by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.95"/> for a range of different atmospheric trace species. Similarly, by varying the scavenging coefficient over the range 1.0–10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we believe we are exploring a wide range of possible Henry's Law solubility coefficients (HLCs) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, a highly soluble species such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a HLC on the order 10<sup>5</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.96"/>, an order of magnitude higher than that suggested for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.97"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.98"/> report the dynamic and convective scavenging coefficients for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as 2.4 and 4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Similar, methanesulfonic acid (another highly soluble trace gas with HLCs reported in the range 10<sup>5</sup> to 10<sup>8</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is reported to have dynamic and convective scavenging coefficients of 5.0 and 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Thus, even if the HLC of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is as high as suggested in previous literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.99"/>, it appears unlikely that it will have a scavenging coefficient outside the range explored in this study, although further experimental work would be required to confirm this hypothesis. Our results show that in this model, the value of the scavenging coefficient (and by extension the Henry's Law coefficient) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> likely has a similar impact on the uncertainty in the in-atmosphere production of HFC-23 to uncertainties in the photolysis parametrisation, but less of an impact than HFO emissions magnitudes. Further modelling of the chemistry of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its deposition with different models, as well as experimental measurements of the various deposition parameters, would help to enhance our understanding of these processes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks</title>
      <p id="d2e7704">Given the importance of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the in-atmosphere production of HFC-23, the fate of this compound was investigated. The sinks considered in the model were photolysis via two different pathways, reaction with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical, and wet and dry deposition. As illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b, photolysis pathway (a), generating non-HFC-23 products was the dominant loss process in every model run, except for “Scav_7” and “Scav_10” in which it was surpassed by wet deposition. Photolysis removed between 43 % and 71 % of the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the twenty runs, while wet deposition (23 %–48 %) and reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (6 %–12 %) made up most of the remaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss. Dry deposition contributed 11 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss in the “Dep_10” run and 2.4 % in the “Dep_1” run, but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 % in all other runs. Pathway (b) photolysis, which produces HFC-23, contributed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 % in all runs. In the “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” run, in which loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via the reversible reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was included in the chemistry scheme, the relative contribution of the major loss processes was unchanged from the “base” run.</p>
      <p id="d2e7828">Again, the relative contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks can be compared with previous estimates in the literature. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.100"/> modelled the photolysis pathway (a) as contributing between 46 % and 74 % of the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss, which agrees well with the range of values from this study. The contribution of deposition processes (wet and dry) in this study was also similar to that in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.101"/> (23 %–48 % compared to 7 %–41 % in that work). However, the contribution of the photolysis pathway (b) (i.e., that which produces HFC-23) in this study is far lower, because <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.102"/> assumed a HFC-23 quantum yield much greater than measured experimentally in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.103"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.104"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7873"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.105"/> also modelled the various sinks of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using the GEOS-Chem atmospheric chemistry and transport model. They found a broadly similar distribution of loss processes, although with deposition much more evenly split between wet and dry compared to this study, in which wet deposition dominated in all runs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>HFO lifetime validation</title>
      <p id="d2e7899">The globally averaged lifetimes of the HFOs considered here can be calculated and compared to the literature, to assess the model's simulation of their breakdown. For all three HFOs, the lifetime was the same through all the model runs except for those that varied the spatial distribution of emissions. In these, a large variation in lifetimes was seen, which can be attributed to the latitudinal distribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals that represent the main sink of HFOs. While some of these spatial distributions are unrealistic, they demonstrate that changing the spatial emission profile would make a minimal difference to HFC-23 production. The lifetimes quoted here are from the “base” scenario.</p>
      <p id="d2e7910">For HFO-1234ze(E), the modelled lifetime was 19.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in excellent agreement with the literature value of 19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported in the WMO Ozone Assessment 2022 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.106"/>. The other species also showed good agreement with the literature values (24.5/27 and 36.0/41.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the modelled/literature lifetimes for the HFO-1336mzz(Z) and HCFO-1233zd(E), respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.107"/>). While the model tended to slightly underestimate the lifetimes, all three species agree to within 12 % of the literature value. This suggests a reasonable simulation of the sinks of these species, especially given the large variation in their lifetimes with latitude.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Global Warming potentials</title>
      <p id="d2e7951">For the eight source gases investigated here, their indirect global warming potential due to their breakdown to HFC-23 is calculated over 20-, 100- and 500-year time horizons using the box model described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>. The 100-year indirect GWPs are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"/>, while the 20- and 500-year values can be found in the supplement. The GWP values are dependent on the fractional yield of HFC-23 from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss, which varied across the twenty model runs from 0.05 % to 0.07 %. Here, we present the mean and standard deviation in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values obtained from the STOCHEM-CRI simulations, alongside their published direct GWPs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.108"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d2e7988">Direct and indirect 100-year global warming potentials (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each of the eight source gases considered in the model. Indirect GWPs are described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>. Direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.109"/>, while the mean and standard deviation (1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the indirect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values calculated across the twenty model runs are presented here.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Indirect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-143a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5900</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-236fa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-245fa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">966</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFC-365mfc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">969</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1234ze(E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HFO-1336mzz(Z)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HCFO-1233zd(E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e8220">From Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"/>, we see that the indirect GWPs for the long-lived source gases are negligible compared to their direct GWPs. The indirect GWPs of the HFOs, however, are larger than their very low direct GWPs. The value for HFO-1234ze(E) falls within the range of uncertainty published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.110"/>, who estimated an indirect GWP between 8.2 and 11.6. It is also in reasonable agreement with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-only and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-only indirect GWPs from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.111"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.112"/>, respectively, which summed to give a total of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.3.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e8270">In this work, we present new estimates of HFC-23 production from the breakdown of fluorinated source gases in the atmosphere, using the STOCHEM-CRI global chemistry and transport model. We carry out a set of sensitivity tests, in order to explore the impact of uncertain parameters (namely source gas emissions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photolysis quantum yields and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition parameters) on in-atmosphere HFC-23 production. We find that the contribution of these breakdown processes to the global HFC-23 budget is likely in the range of 0.013–0.035 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is far lower than previous “upper bound” calculations. Further work to better characterize the key parameters described above would lead to more accurate estimates of HFC-23 production.</p>
      <p id="d2e8316">These findings suggest that global emissions of HFC-23 are dominated by direct emissions into the atmosphere, and that the contribution of in-atmosphere production to the global discrepancy between inferred and reported emissions is negligible. As discussed above, the bulk of the emissions are likely to be associated with HCFC-22 production, although other industrial processes may also contribute. Therefore, investigations into the source of the “missing” HFC-23 should focus on verifying reported abatement rates at HCFC-22 production facilities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.113"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and identifying other potential sources. Even at the top end of our range of estimates, in-atmosphere production cannot account for more than a small fraction of the emission gap.</p>
      <p id="d2e8324">Strategies based on abatement of emissions from industrial sources are likely to be more effective in reducing HFC-23 emissions than minimising the in-atmosphere production pathway. Even as HFO usage increases in response to HFC phase-down under the Kigali Amendment, it would require a dramatic increase in HFO emissions (of at least two orders of magnitude) to lead to HFC-23 production comparable with reported direct emissions, assuming that emissions of other HFCs stay constant. Indeed, the HFCs contribute between 29 % and 79 % of in-atmosphere HFC-23 production in our modelled scenarios, and future abundances of these compounds may have a larger impact on in-atmosphere HFC-23 production than future HFO emissions. On the other hand, all the long-lived species considered in this model are controlled under the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, and their abundances are expected to decrease as production and consumption are phased out globally, reducing the additional impact of their breakdown products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.114"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e8330">Whilst our results show that in-atmosphere production has a small impact on the present day HFC-23 budget, they also show that some HFOs have a larger impact on climate than previously thought. When the indirect effects of their breakdown products are considered, the overall GWPs of HFO-1234ze(E), HFO-1336mzz(Z) and HCFO-1233zd(E) increase by at least a factor of two, and, at the top of our range of plausible values, by almost an order of magnitude. These indirect GWPs are still orders of magnitude lower than the direct GWPs of other HFCs in widespread use (such as HFC-134a, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1470, HFC-32, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 749 and HFC-125, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3820), and would still be a significant improvement on those HFCs in terms of climate impact. For example, European fluorinated gas (F-gas) regulations are phasing out the use of F-gases with direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 150 from 2025 onwards <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.115"/>, and even at the top end of the estimated range of indirect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GWP</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the HFOs considered here would not meet the criterion for phase-out. Nonetheless, the adoption of HFOs without sufficient consideration of their possible long-term impacts on both the climate and the environment echoes previous changes in policy concerning fluorinated species that had unintended consequences. As a result, the importance of understanding the atmospheric fate of these species cannot be understated.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8420">Due to licensing restrictions, the STOCHEM model code is not publicly available. However, code is available on request from the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8426">STOCHEM model outputs are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21718364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.21718364</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.116"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e8435">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10979-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10979-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e8444">BA, MR and DS conceptualised and planned the work. BA, RH and AK developed and adapted the STOCHEM model. DVH and JB performed the photolysis parametrisations. BA carried out the runs and analysed the model outputs. PG and BA developed the box model for the Global Warming Potential analysis. BA, RH, JB and DVH wrote the manuscript, with input from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e8450">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e8456">Any views expressed here are the author's and do not represent official views of NOAA or the U.S. government.  Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e8465">The authors are thankful to the AGAGE community and PIs (particularly Ray Weiss, Ron Prinn, Paul Krummel, Simon O'Doherty, Dickon Young, Stefan Reimann and Chris Lunder) for their continued work on providing high-quality measurement data to support global monitoring of atmospheric trace species (<uri>https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/missions/agage/</uri>, last access: 30 July 2026). AGAGE is supported principally by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (USA) grants to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (NNX07AE89G, NNX16AC98G and 80NSSC21K1369) and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (NNX07AF09G, NNX07AE87G, NNX16AC96G, NNX16AC97G, 80NSSC21K1210 and 80NSSC21K1201). AGAGE measurements are further supported in the United Kingdom by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ, contracts 1028/06/2015, 1537/06/2018 and 5488/11/2021), in the United States the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, contract 1305M319CNRMJ0028), and in Australia by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), the Bureau of Meteorology (Australia), the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (Australia), Refrigerant Reclaim Australia and the Australian Refrigeration Council. Measurements in Norway are supported by the Norwegian Environment Agency, and those from Switzerland by the Swiss National Programs HALCLIM and CLIMGAS-CH (Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, FOEN), by the International Foundation High Altitude Research Stations Jungfraujoch and Gornergrat (HFSJG), and by the European infrastructure projects ICOS and ACTRIS.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e8473">BA is supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) GW4+ Doctoral Landscape Training Partnership (grant no. NE/S007504/1). MR and RH and supported by the NERC InHALE Highlight Topic (Investigating HALocarbon impacts on the global Environment, grant no. NE/X00452X/1).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e8479">This paper was edited by Farahnaz Khosrawi and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adam et al.(2024)Adam, Western, Mühle, Choi, Krummel, O'Doherty, Young, Stanley, Fraser, Harth, Salameh, Weiss, Prinn, Kim, Park, Park, and Rigby</label><mixed-citation>Adam, B., Western, L. M., Mühle, J., Choi, H., Krummel, P. B., O'Doherty, S., Young, D., Stanley, K. M., Fraser, P. J., Harth, C. M., Salameh, P. K., Weiss, R. F., Prinn, R. G., Kim, J., Park, H., Park, S., and Rigby, M.: Emissions of HFC-23 do not reflect commitments made under the Kigali Amendment, Commun. Earth Environ., 5, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01946-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-024-01946-y</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Adam et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Adam, B., Holland, R., Van Hoomissen, D., Burkholder, J., Khan, M. A. H., Griffiths, P., Mühle, J., Shallcross, D., and Rigby, M.: STOCHEM-CRI model output to support 'Confirming the minimal role of in-atmosphere production on the global HFC-23 budget using a 3D chemical and transport model' (Version 20260731), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21718364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.21718364</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Baumann et al.(2025)Baumann, Fernholz, Lelieveld, and Crowley</label><mixed-citation>Baumann, F., Fernholz, C., Lelieveld, J., and Crowley, J. N.: Kinetics of the reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 204 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 361 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D5CP02871J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D5CP02871J</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Burkholder et al.(2019)Burkholder, Abbatt, Cappa, Dibble, Kolb, Orkin, Wilmouth, Sander, Barker, Crounse, Huie, Kurylo, Percival, and Wine</label><mixed-citation>Burkholder, J., Abbatt, J., Cappa, C., Dibble, T., Kolb, C., Orkin, V., Wilmouth, D., Sander, S., Barker, J., Crounse, J., Huie, Kurylo, M., Percival, C., and Wine, P.: JPL Publication 19-5. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Tech. rep., Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48577/jpl.KFQ0TZ" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48577/jpl.KFQ0TZ</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Burkholder et al.(2022)Burkholder, Hodnebrog, McDonald, Orkin, Papadimitriou, and Van Hoomissen</label><mixed-citation>Burkholder, J., Hodnebrog, Ø., McDonald, B., Orkin, V., Papadimitriou, V., and Van Hoomissen, T.: Annex : Summary of Abundances, lifetimes, ODPs, REs, GWPs, and GTPs, in: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion 2022, no. 278 in Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland,   435–492, <uri>https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/Scientific-Assessment-of-Ozone-Depletion-2022.pdf</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Collins et al.(1997)Collins, Stevenson, Johnson, and Derwent</label><mixed-citation>Collins, W. J., Stevenson, D. S., Johnson, C. E., and Derwent, R. G.: Tropospheric Ozone in a Global-Scale Three-Dimensional Lagrangian Model and Its Response to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Emission Controls, J. Atmos. Chem., 26, 223–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005836531979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1005836531979</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Collins et al.(2026)Collins, Daniel, Chipperfield, Cussac, Deushi, Faluvegi, Griffiths, Hodnebrog, Horowitz, Keeble, Kinnison, Naik, O'Connor, Shindell, Tilmes, Tsigaridis, Wang, and Weber</label><mixed-citation>Collins, W. J., Daniel, J. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Cussac, M., Deushi, M., Faluvegi, G., Griffiths, P., Hodnebrog, Ø., Horowitz, L. W., Keeble, J., Kinnison, D., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Shindell, D., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., Wang, Z., and Weber, J.: Indirect climate forcing from ozone depleting substances, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2025-6033</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Crippa et al.(2023)Crippa, Guizzardi, Pagani, Banja, Muntean, Schaaf, Becker, Monforti-Ferrario, Quadrelli, Risquez Martin, Taghavi-Moharamli, Grassi, Rossi, Brandao De Melo, Oom, Branco, San-Miguel, and Vignati</label><mixed-citation>Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Pagani, F., Banja, M., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Becker, W., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Quadrelli, R., Risquez Martin, A., Taghavi-Moharamli, P., Grassi, G., Rossi, S., Brandao De Melo, J., Oom, D., Branco, A., San-Miguel, J., and Vignati, E.: EDGAR v8.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Publications Office of the European Commissions, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2760/953322" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2760/953322</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Derwent et al.(2008)Derwent, Stevenson, Doherty, Collins, and Sanderson</label><mixed-citation>Derwent, R., Stevenson, D., Doherty, R., Collins, W., and Sanderson, M.: How is surface ozone in Europe linked to Asian and North American <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions?, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7412–7422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.037</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Derwent et al.(2025)Derwent, Jenkin, Stevenson, Utembe, Khan, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>Derwent, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Stevenson, D. S., Utembe, S. R., Khan, A. H., and Shallcross, D. E.: Influence of the oxidation of non-methane volatile organic compounds on tropospheric hydrogen: A STOCHEM-CRI global Lagrangian model study, Atmos. Environ., 352, 121214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121214</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>European Union(2024)</label><mixed-citation>European Union: Regulation (EU) 2024/573 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 February 2024 on fluorinated greenhouse gases, amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 517/2014, Official Journal of the European Union, <uri>https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/573/oj</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Garavagno et al.(2025)Garavagno, Wenger, Holland, Fena, Goldstein, Hicks, Liu, Madell, Solomon, Kuwata, McGillen, Khan, Shallcross, Stanley, and Orr-Ewing</label><mixed-citation>Garavagno, M. D. L. A., Wenger, A., Holland, R. E. T., Fena, B. R., Goldstein, S. D., Hicks, D. E., Liu, F., Madell, J. B., Solomon, S. J., Kuwata, K. T., McGillen, M. R., Khan, M. A. H., Shallcross, D. E., Stanley, K. M., and Orr-Ewing, A. J.: Atmospheric Oxidation of Hydrofluoroolefins and Hydrochlorofluoroolefins by Ozone Produces HFC-23, PFC-14, and CFC-13, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 26031–26040, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5c11383</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Holland et al.(2020)Holland, Khan, Chhantyal-Pun, Orr-Ewing, Percival, Taatjes, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>Holland, R., Khan, M. A. H., Chhantyal-Pun, R., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Percival, C. J., Taatjes, C. A., and Shallcross, D. E.: Investigating the Atmospheric Sources and Sinks of Perfluorooctanoic Acid Using a Global Chemistry Transport Model, Atmosphere, 11, 407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11040407" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos11040407</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Holland et al.(2021)Holland, Khan, Driscoll, Chhantyal-Pun, Derwent, Taatjes, Orr-Ewing, Percival, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>Holland, R., Khan, M. A. H., Driscoll, I., Chhantyal-Pun, R., Derwent, R. G., Taatjes, C. A., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Percival, C. J., and Shallcross, D. E.: Investigation of the Production of Trifluoroacetic Acid from Two Halocarbons, HFC-134a and HFO-1234yf and Its Fates Using a Global Three-Dimensional Chemical Transport Model, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 849–857, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00355" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00355</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Jenkin et al.(2008)Jenkin, Watson, Utembe, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Watson, L. A., Utembe, S. R., and Shallcross, D. E.: A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 1: Gas phase mechanism development, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7185–7195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.028</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Khan et al.(2017)Khan, Jenkin, Foulds, Derwent, Percival, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>Khan, M. A. H., Jenkin, M. E., Foulds, A., Derwent, R. G., Percival, C. J., and Shallcross, D. E.: A modeling study of secondary organic aerosol formation from sesquiterpenes using the STOCHEM global chemistry and transport model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4426–4439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD026415</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Khan et al.(2018)Khan, Lyons, Chhantyal-Pun, McGillen, Caravan, Taatjes, Orr-Ewing, Percival, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>Khan, M. A. H., Lyons, K., Chhantyal-Pun, R., McGillen, M. R., Caravan, R. L., Taatjes, C. A., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Percival, C. J., and Shallcross, D. E.: Investigating the Tropospheric Chemistry of Acetic Acid Using the Global 3-D Chemistry Transport Model, STOCHEM-CRI, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6267–6281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028529" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD028529</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Khan et al.(2026)Khan, Mendes, Holland, Garavagno, Orr-Ewing, Stanley, O'Doherty, Young, Vollmer, Antony, Karamshahi, Wallington, Percival, Bacak, Derwent, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>Khan, M. A. H., Mendes, D. C., Holland, R. E. T., de los Angeles Garavagno, M., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Stanley, K. M., O'Doherty, S. J., Young, D., Vollmer, M. K., Antony, A. J., Karamshahi, F., Wallington, T. J., Percival, C. J., Bacak, A., Derwent, R. G., and Shallcross, D. E.: Global modeling of trifluoroacetic acid surface concentration and deposition from the gas-phase oxidation of a wide range of precursor hydrofluoroolefins, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 6,  195–212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00108K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D5EA00108K</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Killen et al.(2026)Killen, Fisher, Hansen, Krummel, Vollmer, and Kable</label><mixed-citation>Killen, B., Fisher, J. A., Hansen, C. S., Krummel, P., Vollmer, M. K., and Kable, S.: Atmospheric fates and global warming potential of HFO-1234ze (E) and its degradation product trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF3CHO), Environ. Sci.-Atmos., 6, 913–932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D6EA00034G" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D6EA00034G</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Laube et al.(2014)Laube, Newland, Hogan, Brenninkmeijer, Fraser, Martinerie, Oram, Reeves, Röckmann, Schwander, Witrant, and Sturges</label><mixed-citation>Laube, J. C., Newland, M. J., Hogan, C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Fraser, P. J., Martinerie, P., Oram, D. E., Reeves, C. E., Röckmann, T., Schwander, J., Witrant, E., and Sturges, W. T.: Newly detected ozone-depleting substances in the atmosphere, Nat. Geosci., 7, 266–269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2109</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Liang et al.(2022)Liang, Rigby, Fang, Godwin, Muhle, Saito, Stanley, and Velders</label><mixed-citation>Liang, Q., Rigby, M., Fang, X., Godwin, D. S., Muhle, J., Saito, T., Stanley, K. M., and Velders, G. J. M.: Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), in: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion 2022, edited by: Montzka, S. and Vollmer, M. K., no. 278 in Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland,  115–152, <uri>https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/Scientific-Assessment-of-Ozone-Depletion-2022.pdf</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Long et al.(2022)Long, Xia, and Truhlar</label><mixed-citation>Long, B., Xia, Y., and Truhlar, D. G.: Quantitative Kinetics of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Reactions with Aldehydes in the Atmosphere: High-Order Dynamic Correlation, Anharmonicity, and Falloff Effects Are All Important, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 144, 19910–19920, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07994" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.2c07994</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>McGillen et al.(2015)McGillen, Bernard, Fleming, and Burkholder</label><mixed-citation>McGillen, M. R., Bernard, F., Fleming, E. L., and Burkholder, J. B.: HCFC-133a (CF3CH2Cl): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate coefficient, UV and infrared absorption spectra, and atmospheric implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 6098–6105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064939" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL064939</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>McGillen et al.(2023)McGillen, Fried, Khan, Kuwata, Martin, O'Doherty, Pecere, Shallcross, Stanley, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>McGillen, M. R., Fried, Z. T. P., Khan, M. A. H., Kuwata, K. T., Martin, C. M., O'Doherty, S., Pecere, F., Shallcross, D. E., Stanley, K. M., and Zhang, K.: Ozonolysis can produce long-lived greenhouse gases from commercial refrigerants, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 120, e2312714120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2312714120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2312714120</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Nielsen et al.(2025a)Nielsen, Andersen, and Franklin</label><mixed-citation>Nielsen, O. J., Andersen, M. P. S., and Franklin, J.: Comment on “Assessing the atmospheric fate of trifluoroacetaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and its potential as a new source of fluoroform (HFC-23) using the AtChem2 box model” by Pérez-Peña et al., Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2023, 3, 1767–1777, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00120B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D3EA00120B</ext-link>, Environ. Sci.-Atmos., 5, 530–534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00123K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D4EA00123K</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Nielsen et al.(2025b)Nielsen, Sulbaek Andersen, and Wallington</label><mixed-citation>Nielsen, O. J., Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., and Wallington, T. J.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production from the ozonolysis of HCFOs: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mtext>=</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Environ., 343, 120953, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120953" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120953</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Pérez-Peña et al.(2023)Pérez-Peña, Fisher, Hansen, and Kable</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Peña, M. P., Fisher, J. A., Hansen, C., and Kable, S. H.: Assessing the atmospheric fate of trifluoroacetaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and its potential as a new source of fluoroform (HFC-23) using the AtChem2 box model, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 3, 1767–1777, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00120B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D3EA00120B</ext-link>, publisher: RSC, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Pérez-Peña et al.(2025)Pérez-Peña, Fisher, Hansen, and Kable</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Peña, M. P., Fisher, J. A., Hansen, C. S., and Kable, S. H.: Reply to the 'Comment on “Assessing the atmospheric fate of trifluoroacetaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and its potential as a new source of fluoroform (HFC-23) using the AtChem2 box model”' by O. J. Nielsen, M. P. Sulbaek Andersen and J. Franklin, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2025, 5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00123K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D4EA00123K</ext-link>, Environ. Sci.-Atmos., 5, 535–538, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00154K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D4EA00154K</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Prinn et al.(2023)Prinn, Weiss, Arduini, Arnold, Fraser, Ganesan, Gasore, Harth, Hermansen, Kim, Krummel, Loh, Lunder, Maione, Manning, Miller, Mitrevski, Mühle, O'Doherty, Park, Reimann, Rigby, Saito, Salameh, Schmidt, Simmonds, Stanley, Steel, Vollmer, Wang, Yao, Young, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>Prinn, R., Weiss, R., Arduini, J., Arnold, T., Fraser, P., Ganesan, A., Gasore, J., Harth, C., Hermansen, O., Kim, J., Krummel, P., Loh, Z., Lunder, C., Maione, M., Manning, A., Miller, B., Mitrevski, B., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Park, S., Reimann, S., Rigby, M., Saito, T., Salameh, P., Schmidt, R., Simmonds, P., Stanley, K., Steel, P., Vollmer, M., Wang, H. R., Yao, B., Young, D., and Zhou, L.: The dataset of in-situ measurements of chemically and radiatively important atmospheric gases from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gas Experiment (AGAGE) and affiliated stations (2023R2),  ESS-DIVE, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15485/2216951" ext-link-type="DOI">10.15485/2216951</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Prinn and Rosenkranz(1994)</label><mixed-citation> Prinn, R. G. and Rosenkranz, H. S. (Eds.): Global Atmospheric-Biospheric Chemistry, 223247, Plenum Publishing, New York,  ISBN 978-1-4613-6075-9, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Prinn et al.(2018)Prinn, Weiss, Arduini, Arnold, DeWitt, Fraser, Ganesan, Gasore, Harth, Hermansen, Kim, Krummel, Li, Loh, Lunder, Maione, Manning, Miller, Mitrevski, Mühle, O'Doherty, Park, Reimann, Rigby, Saito, Salameh, Schmidt, Simmonds, Steele, Vollmer, Wang, Yao, Yokouchi, Young, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., Arduini, J., Arnold, T., DeWitt, H. L., Fraser, P. J., Ganesan, A. L., Gasore, J., Harth, C. M., Hermansen, O., Kim, J., Krummel, P. B., Li, S., Loh, Z. M., Lunder, C. R., Maione, M., Manning, A. J., Miller, B. R., Mitrevski, B., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Park, S., Reimann, S., Rigby, M., Saito, T., Salameh, P. K., Schmidt, R., Simmonds, P. G., Steele, L. P., Vollmer, M. K., Wang, R. H., Yao, B., Yokouchi, Y., Young, D., and Zhou, L.: History of chemically and radiatively important atmospheric gases from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 985–1018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-985-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-10-985-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Rust et al.(2022)Rust, Katharopoulos, Vollmer, Henne, O'Doherty, Say, Emmenegger, Zenobi, and Reimann</label><mixed-citation>Rust, D., Katharopoulos, I., Vollmer, M. K., Henne, S., O'Doherty, S., Say, D., Emmenegger, L., Zenobi, R., and Reimann, S.: Swiss halocarbon emissions for 2019 to 2020 assessed from regional atmospheric observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2447–2466, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2447-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-2447-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Rust et al.(2023)Rust, Vollmer, Henne, Bühlmann, Frumau, van den Bulk, Emmenegger, Zenobi, and Reimann</label><mixed-citation>Rust, D., Vollmer, M. K., Henne, S., Bühlmann, T., Frumau, A., van den Bulk, P., Emmenegger, L., Zenobi, R., and Reimann, S.: First Atmospheric Measurements and Emission Estimates of HFO-1336mzz(Z), Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 11903–11912, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.3c01826</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Rust et al.(2024)Rust, Vollmer, Henne, Frumau, van den Bulk, Hensen, Stanley, Zenobi, Emmenegger, and Reimann</label><mixed-citation>Rust, D., Vollmer, M. K., Henne, S., Frumau, A., van den Bulk, P., Hensen, A., Stanley, K. M., Zenobi, R., Emmenegger, L., and Reimann, S.: Effective realization of abatement measures can reduce HFC-23 emissions, Nature, 633,   96–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07833-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-024-07833-y</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Sander(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Sander, R.: Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901–12440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Scollard et al.(1993)Scollard, Treacy, Sidebottom, Balestra-Garcia, Laverdet, LeBras, MacLeod, and Teton</label><mixed-citation>Scollard, D. J., Treacy, J. J., Sidebottom, H. W., Balestra-Garcia, C., Laverdet, G., LeBras, G., MacLeod, H., and Teton, S.: Rate constants for the reactions of hydroxyl radicals and chlorine atoms with halogenated aldehydes, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 4683–4688, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100120a021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/j100120a021</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Sellevåg et al.(2004)Sellevåg, Kelly, Sidebottom, and Nielsen</label><mixed-citation>Sellevåg, S. R., Kelly, T., Sidebottom, H., and Nielsen, C. J.: A study of the IR and UV-Vis absorption cross-sections, photolysis and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-initiated oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6, 1243–1252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B315941H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B315941H</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Su et al.(2015)Su, Fang, Li, Wu, Zhang, Xu, and Hu</label><mixed-citation>Su, S., Fang, X., Li, L., Wu, J., Zhang, J., Xu, W., and Hu, J.: HFC-134a emissions from mobile air conditioning in China from 1995 to 2030, Atmos. Environ., 102, 122–129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.057</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Sulbaek Andersen and Nielsen(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Sulbaek Andersen, M. P. and Nielsen, O. J.: Tropospheric photolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Environ., 272, 118935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118935" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118935</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Sulbaek Andersen et al.(2004)Sulbaek Andersen, Nielsen, Hurley, Ball, Wallington, Stevens, Martin, Ellis, and Mabury</label><mixed-citation>Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., Nielsen, O. J., Hurley, M. D., Ball, J. C., Wallington, T. J., Stevens, J. E., Martin, J. W., Ellis, D. A., and Mabury, S. A.: Atmospheric Chemistry of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): Reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Atoms, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Radicals and IR Spectra of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108, 5189–5196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0496598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp0496598</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Sulbaek Andersen et al.(2023)Sulbaek Andersen, Madronich, Ohide, Frausig, and Nielsen</label><mixed-citation>Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., Madronich, S., Ohide, J. M., Frausig, M., and Nielsen, O. J.: Photolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 254 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and potential contribution to the atmospheric abundance of HFC-23, Atmos. Environ., 314, 120087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120087</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Thomson et al.(2024)Thomson, Campbell, Edwards, Medcraft, Nauta, Pérez-Peña, Fisher, Osborn, Kable, and Hansen</label><mixed-citation>Thomson, J. D., Campbell, J. S., Edwards, E. B., Medcraft, C., Nauta, K., Pérez-Peña, M. P., Fisher, J. A., Osborn, D. L., Kable, S. H., and Hansen, C. S.: Fluoroform (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) Production from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Photolysis and Implications for the Decomposition of Hydrofluoroolefins and Hydrochlorofluoroolefins in the Atmosphere, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,   147, 33–38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c11776" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.4c11776</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2016)</label><mixed-citation>United Nations Environment Programme: Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, type: treaty Place: Kigali, Rwanda,  <uri>https://ozone.unep.org/treaties/montreal-protocol/amendments/kigali-amendment-2016-amendment-montreal-protocol-agreed</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2023)</label><mixed-citation>United Nations Environment Programme: Report of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, September 2023. Volume 6: Response to Decision XXXIV/7: Strengthening Institutional Processes with respect to Information on HFC-23 By-Product Emissions, Tech. Rep. Volume 6, United Nations Environment Programme, <uri>https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/TEAP-MCTOC-response-to-decision%20XXXIV7-report-september2023.pdf</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>United Nations Environment Programme: Report of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, September 2024. Volume 5: Response to Decision XXXV/7: Emissions of HFC-23, Tech. Rep. Volume 5, United Nations Environment Programme, <uri>https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/TEAP-reponse-to-decision-XXXV-7-report-september-2024.pdf</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>United Nations Environment Programme: Report of the Scientific Assessment Panel, September 2024. Response to Decision XXXV/7: Emissions of HFC-23, Tech. rep., United Nations Environment Programme, <uri>https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/SAP_Report_on_HFC23_September2024.pdf</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2025a)</label><mixed-citation>United Nations Environment Programme: HFC-23 emissions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Ozone Secretariat, United Nations Environment Programme, <uri>https://ozone.unep.org/hfc-23-emissions</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2025b)</label><mixed-citation>United Nations Environment Programme: Report of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, September 2025. Volume 2: Response to Decision XXXVI/3: Emissions of HFC-23, Tech. Rep. Volume 2, United Nations Environment Programme, <uri>https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/TEAP-reponse-to-decision-XXXVI-3-report-september-2025.pdf</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Utembe et al.(2009)Utembe, Watson, Shallcross, and Jenkin</label><mixed-citation>Utembe, S. R., Watson, L. A., Shallcross, D. E., and Jenkin, M. E.: A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 3: Development of a secondary organic aerosol module, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1982–1990, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.008</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Utembe et al.(2010)Utembe, Cooke, Archibald, Jenkin, Derwent, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>Utembe, S. R., Cooke, M. C., Archibald, A. T., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Shallcross, D. E.: Using a reduced Common Representative Intermediates (CRIv2-R5) mechanism to simulate tropospheric ozone in a 3-D Lagrangian chemistry transport model, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1609–1622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.044</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Van Hoomissen et al.(2025)Van Hoomissen, Chattopadhyay, Montzka, and Burkholder</label><mixed-citation>Van Hoomissen, D., Chattopadhyay, A., Montzka, S. A., and Burkholder, J. B.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HFC-23) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Quantum Yields in the Pulsed Laser Photolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 248, 266, 281, and 308 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ACS Earth Space Chem.,  9, 589–602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00316</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Velders et al.(2009)Velders, Fahey, Daniel, McFarland, and Andersen</label><mixed-citation>Velders, G. J. M., Fahey, D. W., Daniel, J. S., McFarland, M., and Andersen, S. O.: The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 10949–10954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902817106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0902817106</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Vollmer et al.(2015)Vollmer, Reimann, Hill, and Brunner</label><mixed-citation>Vollmer, M. K., Reimann, S., Hill, M., and Brunner, D.: First Observations of the Fourth Generation Synthetic Halocarbons HFC-1234yf, HFC-1234ze(E), and HCFC-1233zd(E) in the Atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 2703–2708, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es505123x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es505123x</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Vollmer et al.(2026)Vollmer, Pitt, Young, Henne, Mitrevski, Mühle, Ganesan, Arduini, Manning, Wagenhäuser, Redington, Murphy, Gluckmann, Stanley, Krummel, Lunder, Yun, Rust, Wenger, Guillevic, Kim, Wang, Rhee, Constantin, Frumau, Harth, Salameh, Hermansen, Engel, O'Doherty, Park, Maione, Fraser, Prinn, Weiss, and Reimann</label><mixed-citation>Vollmer, M. K., Pitt, J. R., Young, D., Henne, S., Mitrevski, B., Mühle, J., Ganesan, A., Arduini, J., Manning, A. J., Wagenhäuser, T., Redington, A. L., Melo, D. B., Murphy, B., Gluckmann, R., Stanley, K. M., Krummel, P. B., Lunder, C. R., Yun, J., Rust, D., Wenger, A., Guillevic, M., Kim, J., Wang, R. H. J., Rhee, T. S., Constantin, L., Frumau, A., Harth, C. M., Salameh, P. K., Hermansen, O., Rigby, M., Western, L. M., Engel, A., O'Doherty, S., Park, S., Maione, M., Fraser, P. J., Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., and Reimann, S.: Global Observations and European emissions of the halogenated olefins HFO-1234yf, HFO-1234ze(E), and HCFO-1233zd(E) from the AGAGE (Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment) network, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 6993–7012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6993-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-26-6993-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Watson et al.(2008)Watson, Shallcross, Utembe, and Jenkin</label><mixed-citation>Watson, L. A., Shallcross, D. E., Utembe, S. R., and Jenkin, M. E.: A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 2: Gas phase mechanism reduction, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7196–7204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.034</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Western et al.(2025)Western, Rigby, Mühle, Krummel, Lunder, O'Doherty, Reimann, Vollmer, Young, Adam, Fraser, Ganesan, Harth, Hermansen, Kim, Langenfelds, Loh, Mitrevski, Pitt, Salameh, Schmidt, Stanley, Stavert, Wang, Weiss, and Prinn</label><mixed-citation>Western, L. M., Rigby, M., Mühle, J., Krummel, P. B., Lunder, C. R., O'Doherty, S., Reimann, S., Vollmer, M. K., Young, D., Adam, B., Fraser, P. J., Ganesan, A. L., Harth, C. M., Hermansen, O., Kim, J., Langenfelds, R. L., Loh, Z. M., Mitrevski, B., Pitt, J. R., Salameh, P. K., Schmidt, R., Stanley, K., Stavert, A. R., Wang, H.-J., Weiss, R. F., and Prinn, R. G.: Global emissions and abundances of chemically and radiatively important trace gases from the AGAGE network, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 6557–6582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6557-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-17-6557-2025</ext-link>, 2025. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Winiberg et al.(2018)Winiberg, Percival, Shannon, Khan, Shallcross, Liu, and Sander</label><mixed-citation> Winiberg, F. A., Percival, C. J., Shannon, R., Khan, M. A. H., Shallcross, D. E., Liu, Y., and Sander, S. P.: Reaction kinetics of OH+ HNO 3 under conditions relevant to the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20, 24652–24664, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>World Bank Group(2025)</label><mixed-citation>World Bank Group: World Bank Open Data, blackboxPlease add the name of the publisher/publishing institution., <uri>https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD</uri> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Zhang et al.(2023)Zhang, He, Wu, Macdonald, Brook, and Kharol</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., He, Z., Wu, Z., Macdonald, A. M., Brook, J. R., and Kharol, S.: A database of modeled gridded dry deposition velocities for 45 gaseous species and three particle size ranges across North America, J. Environ. Sci., 127, 264–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.05.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2022.05.030</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Confirming the minimal role of in-atmosphere production on the global HFC-23 budget using a 3D chemical and transport model</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adam et al.(2024)Adam, Western, Mühle, Choi, Krummel, O'Doherty, Young, Stanley, Fraser, Harth, Salameh, Weiss, Prinn, Kim, Park, Park, and Rigby</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adam, B., Western, L. M., Mühle, J., Choi, H., Krummel, P. B., O'Doherty, S., Young, D., Stanley, K. M., Fraser, P. J., Harth, C. M., Salameh, P. K., Weiss, R. F., Prinn, R. G., Kim, J., Park, H., Park, S., and Rigby, M.:
Emissions of HFC-23 do not reflect commitments made under the Kigali Amendment, Commun. Earth Environ., 5, 1–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01946-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01946-y</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Adam et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adam, B., Holland, R., Van Hoomissen, D., Burkholder, J., Khan, M. A. H., Griffiths, P., Mühle, J., Shallcross, D., and Rigby, M.: STOCHEM-CRI model output to support 'Confirming the minimal role of in-atmosphere production on the global HFC-23 budget using a 3D chemical and transport model' (Version 20260731), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21718364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21718364</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Baumann et al.(2025)Baumann, Fernholz, Lelieveld, and Crowley</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baumann, F., Fernholz, C., Lelieveld, J., and Crowley, J. N.:
Kinetics of the reaction of CF<sub>3</sub>CHO with OH between 204&thinsp;K and 361&thinsp;K, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D5CP02871J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D5CP02871J</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Burkholder et al.(2019)Burkholder, Abbatt, Cappa, Dibble, Kolb, Orkin, Wilmouth, Sander, Barker, Crounse, Huie, Kurylo, Percival, and Wine</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burkholder, J., Abbatt, J., Cappa, C., Dibble, T., Kolb, C., Orkin, V., Wilmouth, D., Sander, S., Barker, J., Crounse, J., Huie, Kurylo, M., Percival, C., and Wine, P.:
JPL Publication 19-5. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Tech. rep., Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.48577/jpl.KFQ0TZ" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48577/jpl.KFQ0TZ</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Burkholder et al.(2022)Burkholder, Hodnebrog, McDonald, Orkin, Papadimitriou, and Van Hoomissen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burkholder, J., Hodnebrog, Ø., McDonald, B., Orkin, V., Papadimitriou, V., and Van Hoomissen, T.:
Annex : Summary of Abundances, lifetimes, ODPs, REs, GWPs, and GTPs, in: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion 2022, no. 278 in Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland,   435–492, <a href="https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/Scientific-Assessment-of-Ozone-Depletion-2022.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Collins et al.(1997)Collins, Stevenson, Johnson, and Derwent</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collins, W. J., Stevenson, D. S., Johnson, C. E., and Derwent, R. G.:
Tropospheric Ozone in a Global-Scale Three-Dimensional Lagrangian Model and Its Response to NO<sub>X</sub> Emission Controls, J. Atmos. Chem., 26, 223–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005836531979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005836531979</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Collins et al.(2026)Collins, Daniel, Chipperfield, Cussac, Deushi, Faluvegi, Griffiths, Hodnebrog, Horowitz, Keeble, Kinnison, Naik, O'Connor, Shindell, Tilmes, Tsigaridis, Wang, and Weber</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collins, W. J., Daniel, J. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Cussac, M., Deushi, M., Faluvegi, G., Griffiths, P., Hodnebrog, Ø., Horowitz, L. W., Keeble, J., Kinnison, D., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Shindell, D., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., Wang, Z., and Weber, J.:
Indirect climate forcing from ozone depleting substances, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6033</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Crippa et al.(2023)Crippa, Guizzardi, Pagani, Banja, Muntean, Schaaf, Becker, Monforti-Ferrario, Quadrelli, Risquez Martin, Taghavi-Moharamli, Grassi, Rossi, Brandao De Melo, Oom, Branco, San-Miguel, and Vignati</label><mixed-citation>
      
Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Pagani, F., Banja, M., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Becker, W., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Quadrelli, R., Risquez Martin, A., Taghavi-Moharamli, P., Grassi, G., Rossi, S., Brandao De Melo, J., Oom, D., Branco, A., San-Miguel, J., and Vignati, E.:
EDGAR v8.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Publications Office of the European Commissions, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2760/953322" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2760/953322</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Derwent et al.(2008)Derwent, Stevenson, Doherty, Collins, and Sanderson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Derwent, R., Stevenson, D., Doherty, R., Collins, W., and Sanderson, M.:
How is surface ozone in Europe linked to Asian and North American NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions?, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7412–7422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.037</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Derwent et al.(2025)Derwent, Jenkin, Stevenson, Utembe, Khan, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>
      
Derwent, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Stevenson, D. S., Utembe, S. R., Khan, A. H., and Shallcross, D. E.:
Influence of the oxidation of non-methane volatile organic compounds on tropospheric hydrogen: A STOCHEM-CRI global Lagrangian model study, Atmos. Environ., 352, 121214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121214" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121214</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>European Union(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
European Union:
Regulation (EU) 2024/573 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 February 2024 on fluorinated greenhouse gases, amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 517/2014, Official Journal of the European Union, <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/573/oj" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Garavagno et al.(2025)Garavagno, Wenger, Holland, Fena, Goldstein, Hicks, Liu, Madell, Solomon, Kuwata, McGillen, Khan, Shallcross, Stanley, and Orr-Ewing</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garavagno, M. D. L. A., Wenger, A., Holland, R. E. T., Fena, B. R., Goldstein, S. D., Hicks, D. E., Liu, F., Madell, J. B., Solomon, S. J., Kuwata, K. T., McGillen, M. R., Khan, M. A. H., Shallcross, D. E., Stanley, K. M., and Orr-Ewing, A. J.:
Atmospheric Oxidation of Hydrofluoroolefins and Hydrochlorofluoroolefins by Ozone Produces HFC-23, PFC-14, and CFC-13, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 26031–26040, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11383" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11383</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Holland et al.(2020)Holland, Khan, Chhantyal-Pun, Orr-Ewing, Percival, Taatjes, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>
      
Holland, R., Khan, M. A. H., Chhantyal-Pun, R., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Percival, C. J., Taatjes, C. A., and Shallcross, D. E.:
Investigating the Atmospheric Sources and Sinks of Perfluorooctanoic Acid Using a Global Chemistry Transport Model, Atmosphere, 11, 407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11040407" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11040407</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Holland et al.(2021)Holland, Khan, Driscoll, Chhantyal-Pun, Derwent, Taatjes, Orr-Ewing, Percival, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>
      
Holland, R., Khan, M. A. H., Driscoll, I., Chhantyal-Pun, R., Derwent, R. G., Taatjes, C. A., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Percival, C. J., and Shallcross, D. E.:
Investigation of the Production of Trifluoroacetic Acid from Two Halocarbons, HFC-134a and HFO-1234yf and Its Fates Using a Global Three-Dimensional Chemical Transport Model, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 849–857, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00355" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00355</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Jenkin et al.(2008)Jenkin, Watson, Utembe, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jenkin, M. E., Watson, L. A., Utembe, S. R., and Shallcross, D. E.:
A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 1: Gas phase mechanism development, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7185–7195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.028</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Khan et al.(2017)Khan, Jenkin, Foulds, Derwent, Percival, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khan, M. A. H., Jenkin, M. E., Foulds, A., Derwent, R. G., Percival, C. J., and Shallcross, D. E.:
A modeling study of secondary organic aerosol formation from sesquiterpenes using the STOCHEM global chemistry and transport model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4426–4439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026415" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026415</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Khan et al.(2018)Khan, Lyons, Chhantyal-Pun, McGillen, Caravan, Taatjes, Orr-Ewing, Percival, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khan, M. A. H., Lyons, K., Chhantyal-Pun, R., McGillen, M. R., Caravan, R. L., Taatjes, C. A., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Percival, C. J., and Shallcross, D. E.:
Investigating the Tropospheric Chemistry of Acetic Acid Using the Global 3-D Chemistry Transport Model, STOCHEM-CRI, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6267–6281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028529" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028529</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Khan et al.(2026)Khan, Mendes, Holland, Garavagno, Orr-Ewing, Stanley, O'Doherty, Young, Vollmer, Antony, Karamshahi, Wallington, Percival, Bacak, Derwent, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khan, M. A. H., Mendes, D. C., Holland, R. E. T., de los Angeles Garavagno, M., Orr-Ewing, A. J., Stanley, K. M., O'Doherty, S. J., Young, D., Vollmer, M. K., Antony, A. J., Karamshahi, F., Wallington, T. J., Percival, C. J., Bacak, A., Derwent, R. G., and Shallcross, D. E.:
Global modeling of trifluoroacetic acid surface concentration and deposition from the gas-phase oxidation of a wide range of precursor hydrofluoroolefins, Environ. Sci.:
Atmos., 6,  195–212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00108K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00108K</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Killen et al.(2026)Killen, Fisher, Hansen, Krummel, Vollmer, and Kable</label><mixed-citation>
      
Killen, B., Fisher, J. A., Hansen, C. S., Krummel, P., Vollmer, M. K., and Kable, S.:
Atmospheric fates and global warming potential of HFO-1234ze (E) and its degradation product trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF3CHO), Environ. Sci.-Atmos., 6, 913–932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D6EA00034G" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D6EA00034G</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Laube et al.(2014)Laube, Newland, Hogan, Brenninkmeijer, Fraser, Martinerie, Oram, Reeves, Röckmann, Schwander, Witrant, and Sturges</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laube, J. C., Newland, M. J., Hogan, C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Fraser, P. J., Martinerie, P., Oram, D. E., Reeves, C. E., Röckmann, T., Schwander, J., Witrant, E., and Sturges, W. T.:
Newly detected ozone-depleting substances in the atmosphere, Nat. Geosci., 7, 266–269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2109</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Liang et al.(2022)Liang, Rigby, Fang, Godwin, Muhle, Saito, Stanley, and Velders</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liang, Q., Rigby, M., Fang, X., Godwin, D. S., Muhle, J., Saito, T., Stanley, K. M., and Velders, G. J. M.:
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), in: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion 2022, edited by: Montzka, S. and Vollmer, M. K., no. 278 in Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland,  115–152, <a href="https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/Scientific-Assessment-of-Ozone-Depletion-2022.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Long et al.(2022)Long, Xia, and Truhlar</label><mixed-citation>
      
Long, B., Xia, Y., and Truhlar, D. G.:
Quantitative Kinetics of HO<sub>2</sub> Reactions with Aldehydes in the Atmosphere: High-Order Dynamic Correlation, Anharmonicity, and Falloff Effects Are All Important, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 144, 19910–19920, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07994" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c07994</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>McGillen et al.(2015)McGillen, Bernard, Fleming, and Burkholder</label><mixed-citation>
      
McGillen, M. R., Bernard, F., Fleming, E. L., and Burkholder, J. B.:
HCFC-133a (CF3CH2Cl): OH rate coefficient, UV and infrared absorption spectra, and atmospheric implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 6098–6105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064939" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064939</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>McGillen et al.(2023)McGillen, Fried, Khan, Kuwata, Martin, O'Doherty, Pecere, Shallcross, Stanley, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
McGillen, M. R., Fried, Z. T. P., Khan, M. A. H., Kuwata, K. T., Martin, C. M., O'Doherty, S., Pecere, F., Shallcross, D. E., Stanley, K. M., and Zhang, K.:
Ozonolysis can produce long-lived greenhouse gases from commercial refrigerants, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 120, e2312714120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2312714120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2312714120</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Nielsen et al.(2025a)Nielsen, Andersen, and Franklin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nielsen, O. J., Andersen, M. P. S., and Franklin, J.:
Comment on “Assessing the atmospheric fate of trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF<sub>3</sub>CHO) and its potential as a new source of fluoroform (HFC-23) using the AtChem2 box model” by Pérez-Peña et al., Environ. Sci.:
Atmos., 2023, 3, 1767–1777, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00120B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00120B</a>, Environ. Sci.-Atmos., 5, 530–534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00123K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00123K</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Nielsen et al.(2025b)Nielsen, Sulbaek Andersen, and Wallington</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nielsen, O. J., Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., and Wallington, T. J.:
CF<sub>3</sub>H production from the ozonolysis of HCFOs: <i>E</i>- and <i>Z</i>-CF<sub>3</sub>CH=CHCl, Atmos. Environ., 343, 120953, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120953" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120953</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Pérez-Peña et al.(2023)Pérez-Peña, Fisher, Hansen, and Kable</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Peña, M. P., Fisher, J. A., Hansen, C., and Kable, S. H.:
Assessing the atmospheric fate of trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF<sub>3</sub>CHO) and its potential as a new source of fluoroform (HFC-23) using the AtChem2 box model, Environ. Sci.:
Atmos., 3, 1767–1777, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00120B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00120B</a>, publisher: RSC, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Pérez-Peña et al.(2025)Pérez-Peña, Fisher, Hansen, and Kable</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Peña, M. P., Fisher, J. A., Hansen, C. S., and Kable, S. H.:
Reply to the 'Comment on “Assessing the atmospheric fate of trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF<sub>3</sub>CHO) and its potential as a new source of fluoroform (HFC-23) using the AtChem2 box model”' by O. J. Nielsen, M. P. Sulbaek Andersen and J. Franklin, Environ. Sci.:
Atmos., 2025, 5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00123K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00123K</a>, Environ. Sci.-Atmos., 5, 535–538, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00154K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00154K</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Prinn et al.(2023)Prinn, Weiss, Arduini, Arnold, Fraser, Ganesan, Gasore, Harth, Hermansen, Kim, Krummel, Loh, Lunder, Maione, Manning, Miller, Mitrevski, Mühle, O'Doherty, Park, Reimann, Rigby, Saito, Salameh, Schmidt, Simmonds, Stanley, Steel, Vollmer, Wang, Yao, Young, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prinn, R., Weiss, R., Arduini, J., Arnold, T., Fraser, P., Ganesan, A., Gasore, J., Harth, C., Hermansen, O., Kim, J., Krummel, P., Loh, Z., Lunder, C., Maione, M., Manning, A., Miller, B., Mitrevski, B., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Park, S., Reimann, S., Rigby, M., Saito, T., Salameh, P., Schmidt, R., Simmonds, P., Stanley, K., Steel, P., Vollmer, M., Wang, H. R., Yao, B., Young, D., and Zhou, L.:
The dataset of in-situ measurements of chemically and radiatively important atmospheric gases from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gas Experiment (AGAGE) and affiliated stations (2023R2),  ESS-DIVE, <a href="https://doi.org/10.15485/2216951" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15485/2216951</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Prinn and Rosenkranz(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prinn, R. G. and Rosenkranz, H. S. (Eds.):
Global Atmospheric-Biospheric Chemistry, 223247, Plenum Publishing, New York,  ISBN 978-1-4613-6075-9, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Prinn et al.(2018)Prinn, Weiss, Arduini, Arnold, DeWitt, Fraser, Ganesan, Gasore, Harth, Hermansen, Kim, Krummel, Li, Loh, Lunder, Maione, Manning, Miller, Mitrevski, Mühle, O'Doherty, Park, Reimann, Rigby, Saito, Salameh, Schmidt, Simmonds, Steele, Vollmer, Wang, Yao, Yokouchi, Young, and Zhou</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., Arduini, J., Arnold, T., DeWitt, H. L., Fraser, P. J., Ganesan, A. L., Gasore, J., Harth, C. M., Hermansen, O., Kim, J., Krummel, P. B., Li, S., Loh, Z. M., Lunder, C. R., Maione, M., Manning, A. J., Miller, B. R., Mitrevski, B., Mühle, J., O'Doherty, S., Park, S., Reimann, S., Rigby, M., Saito, T., Salameh, P. K., Schmidt, R., Simmonds, P. G., Steele, L. P., Vollmer, M. K., Wang, R. H., Yao, B., Yokouchi, Y., Young, D., and Zhou, L.:
History of chemically and radiatively important atmospheric gases from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 985–1018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-985-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-985-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Rust et al.(2022)Rust, Katharopoulos, Vollmer, Henne, O'Doherty, Say, Emmenegger, Zenobi, and Reimann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rust, D., Katharopoulos, I., Vollmer, M. K., Henne, S., O'Doherty, S., Say, D., Emmenegger, L., Zenobi, R., and Reimann, S.:
Swiss halocarbon emissions for 2019 to 2020 assessed from regional atmospheric observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2447–2466, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2447-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2447-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Rust et al.(2023)Rust, Vollmer, Henne, Bühlmann, Frumau, van den Bulk, Emmenegger, Zenobi, and Reimann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rust, D., Vollmer, M. K., Henne, S., Bühlmann, T., Frumau, A., van den Bulk, P., Emmenegger, L., Zenobi, R., and Reimann, S.:
First Atmospheric Measurements and Emission Estimates of HFO-1336mzz(Z), Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 11903–11912, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01826" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01826</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Rust et al.(2024)Rust, Vollmer, Henne, Frumau, van den Bulk, Hensen, Stanley, Zenobi, Emmenegger, and Reimann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rust, D., Vollmer, M. K., Henne, S., Frumau, A., van den Bulk, P., Hensen, A., Stanley, K. M., Zenobi, R., Emmenegger, L., and Reimann, S.:
Effective realization of abatement measures can reduce HFC-23 emissions, Nature, 633,   96–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07833-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07833-y</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Sander(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sander, R.:
Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for water as solvent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10901–12440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Scollard et al.(1993)Scollard, Treacy, Sidebottom, Balestra-Garcia, Laverdet, LeBras, MacLeod, and Teton</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scollard, D. J., Treacy, J. J., Sidebottom, H. W., Balestra-Garcia, C., Laverdet, G., LeBras, G., MacLeod, H., and Teton, S.:
Rate constants for the reactions of hydroxyl radicals and chlorine atoms with halogenated aldehydes, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 4683–4688, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100120a021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/j100120a021</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Sellevåg et al.(2004)Sellevåg, Kelly, Sidebottom, and Nielsen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sellevåg, S. R., Kelly, T., Sidebottom, H., and Nielsen, C. J.:
A study of the IR and UV-Vis absorption cross-sections, photolysis and OH-initiated oxidation of CF<sub>3</sub>CHO and CF<sub>3</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>CHO, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6, 1243–1252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B315941H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B315941H</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Su et al.(2015)Su, Fang, Li, Wu, Zhang, Xu, and Hu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, S., Fang, X., Li, L., Wu, J., Zhang, J., Xu, W., and Hu, J.:
HFC-134a emissions from mobile air conditioning in China from 1995 to 2030, Atmos. Environ., 102, 122–129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.057</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Sulbaek Andersen and Nielsen(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sulbaek Andersen, M. P. and Nielsen, O. J.:
Tropospheric photolysis of CF<sub>3</sub>CHO, Atmos. Environ., 272, 118935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118935" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118935</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Sulbaek Andersen et al.(2004)Sulbaek Andersen, Nielsen, Hurley, Ball, Wallington, Stevens, Martin, Ellis, and Mabury</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., Nielsen, O. J., Hurley, M. D., Ball, J. C., Wallington, T. J., Stevens, J. E., Martin, J. W., Ellis, D. A., and Mabury, S. A.:
Atmospheric Chemistry of <i>n</i>-C<sub><i>x</i></sub>F<sub>2<i>x</i> + 1</sub>CHO (<i>x</i> = 1,3,4): Reaction with Cl Atoms, OH Radicals and IR Spectra of C<sub><i>x</i></sub>F<sub>2<i>x</i> + 1</sub>C(O)O<sub>2</sub>NO<sub>2</sub>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108, 5189–5196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0496598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0496598</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Sulbaek Andersen et al.(2023)Sulbaek Andersen, Madronich, Ohide, Frausig, and Nielsen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., Madronich, S., Ohide, J. M., Frausig, M., and Nielsen, O. J.:
Photolysis of CF<sub>3</sub>CHO at 254&thinsp;nm and potential contribution to the atmospheric abundance of HFC-23, Atmos. Environ., 314, 120087, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120087" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120087</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Thomson et al.(2024)Thomson, Campbell, Edwards, Medcraft, Nauta, Pérez-Peña, Fisher, Osborn, Kable, and Hansen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thomson, J. D., Campbell, J. S., Edwards, E. B., Medcraft, C., Nauta, K., Pérez-Peña, M. P., Fisher, J. A., Osborn, D. L., Kable, S. H., and Hansen, C. S.:
Fluoroform (CHF<sub>3</sub>) Production from CF<sub>3</sub>CHO Photolysis and Implications for the Decomposition of Hydrofluoroolefins and Hydrochlorofluoroolefins in the Atmosphere, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,   147, 33–38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c11776" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c11776</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
United Nations Environment Programme:
Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, type: treaty Place: Kigali, Rwanda,  <a href="https://ozone.unep.org/treaties/montreal-protocol/amendments/kigali-amendment-2016-amendment-montreal-protocol-agreed" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
United Nations Environment Programme:
Report of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, September 2023. Volume 6: Response to Decision XXXIV/7: Strengthening Institutional Processes with respect to Information on HFC-23 By-Product Emissions, Tech. Rep. Volume 6, United Nations Environment Programme, <a href="https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/TEAP-MCTOC-response-to-decision%20XXXIV7-report-september2023.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
United Nations Environment Programme:
Report of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, September 2024. Volume 5: Response to Decision XXXV/7: Emissions of HFC-23, Tech. Rep. Volume 5, United Nations Environment Programme, <a href="https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/TEAP-reponse-to-decision-XXXV-7-report-september-2024.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
United Nations Environment Programme:
Report of the Scientific Assessment Panel, September 2024. Response to Decision XXXV/7: Emissions of HFC-23, Tech. rep., United Nations Environment Programme, <a href="https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/SAP_Report_on_HFC23_September2024.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2025a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
United Nations Environment Programme:
HFC-23 emissions&thinsp;|&thinsp;Ozone Secretariat, United Nations Environment Programme, <a href="https://ozone.unep.org/hfc-23-emissions" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>United Nations Environment Programme(2025b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
United Nations Environment Programme:
Report of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, September 2025. Volume 2: Response to Decision XXXVI/3: Emissions of HFC-23, Tech. Rep. Volume 2, United Nations Environment Programme, <a href="https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/TEAP-reponse-to-decision-XXXVI-3-report-september-2025.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Utembe et al.(2009)Utembe, Watson, Shallcross, and Jenkin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Utembe, S. R., Watson, L. A., Shallcross, D. E., and Jenkin, M. E.:
A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 3: Development of a secondary organic aerosol module, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1982–1990, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.008</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Utembe et al.(2010)Utembe, Cooke, Archibald, Jenkin, Derwent, and Shallcross</label><mixed-citation>
      
Utembe, S. R., Cooke, M. C., Archibald, A. T., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Shallcross, D. E.:
Using a reduced Common Representative Intermediates (CRIv2-R5) mechanism to simulate tropospheric ozone in a 3-D Lagrangian chemistry transport model, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1609–1622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.044</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Van Hoomissen et al.(2025)Van Hoomissen, Chattopadhyay, Montzka, and Burkholder</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Hoomissen, D., Chattopadhyay, A., Montzka, S. A., and Burkholder, J. B.:
CHF<sub>3</sub> (HFC-23) and CF<sub>3</sub>CHO Quantum Yields in the Pulsed Laser Photolysis of CF<sub>3</sub>CHO at 248, 266, 281, and 308&thinsp;nm, ACS Earth Space Chem.,  9, 589–602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00316" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00316</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Velders et al.(2009)Velders, Fahey, Daniel, McFarland, and Andersen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Velders, G. J. M., Fahey, D. W., Daniel, J. S., McFarland, M., and Andersen, S. O.:
The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 10949–10954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902817106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902817106</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Vollmer et al.(2015)Vollmer, Reimann, Hill, and Brunner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vollmer, M. K., Reimann, S., Hill, M., and Brunner, D.:
First Observations of the Fourth Generation Synthetic Halocarbons HFC-1234yf, HFC-1234ze(E), and HCFC-1233zd(E) in the Atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 2703–2708, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es505123x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es505123x</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Vollmer et al.(2026)Vollmer, Pitt, Young, Henne, Mitrevski, Mühle, Ganesan, Arduini, Manning, Wagenhäuser, Redington, Murphy, Gluckmann, Stanley, Krummel, Lunder, Yun, Rust, Wenger, Guillevic, Kim, Wang, Rhee, Constantin, Frumau, Harth, Salameh, Hermansen, Engel, O'Doherty, Park, Maione, Fraser, Prinn, Weiss, and Reimann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vollmer, M. K., Pitt, J. R., Young, D., Henne, S., Mitrevski, B., Mühle, J., Ganesan, A., Arduini, J., Manning, A. J., Wagenhäuser, T., Redington, A. L., Melo, D. B., Murphy, B., Gluckmann, R., Stanley, K. M., Krummel, P. B., Lunder, C. R., Yun, J., Rust, D., Wenger, A., Guillevic, M., Kim, J., Wang, R. H. J., Rhee, T. S., Constantin, L., Frumau, A., Harth, C. M., Salameh, P. K., Hermansen, O., Rigby, M., Western, L. M., Engel, A., O'Doherty, S., Park, S., Maione, M., Fraser, P. J., Prinn, R. G., Weiss, R. F., and Reimann, S.:
Global Observations and European emissions of the halogenated olefins HFO-1234yf, HFO-1234ze(E), and HCFO-1233zd(E) from the AGAGE (Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment) network, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 6993–7012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6993-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6993-2026</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Watson et al.(2008)Watson, Shallcross, Utembe, and Jenkin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Watson, L. A., Shallcross, D. E., Utembe, S. R., and Jenkin, M. E.:
A Common Representative Intermediates (CRI) mechanism for VOC degradation. Part 2: Gas phase mechanism reduction, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7196–7204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.034</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Western et al.(2025)Western, Rigby, Mühle, Krummel, Lunder, O'Doherty, Reimann, Vollmer, Young, Adam, Fraser, Ganesan, Harth, Hermansen, Kim, Langenfelds, Loh, Mitrevski, Pitt, Salameh, Schmidt, Stanley, Stavert, Wang, Weiss, and Prinn</label><mixed-citation>
      
Western, L. M., Rigby, M., Mühle, J., Krummel, P. B., Lunder, C. R., O'Doherty, S., Reimann, S., Vollmer, M. K., Young, D., Adam, B., Fraser, P. J., Ganesan, A. L., Harth, C. M., Hermansen, O., Kim, J., Langenfelds, R. L., Loh, Z. M., Mitrevski, B., Pitt, J. R., Salameh, P. K., Schmidt, R., Stanley, K., Stavert, A. R., Wang, H.-J., Weiss, R. F., and Prinn, R. G.:
Global emissions and abundances of chemically and radiatively important trace gases from the AGAGE network, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 6557–6582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6557-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6557-2025</a>, 2025.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Winiberg et al.(2018)Winiberg, Percival, Shannon, Khan, Shallcross, Liu, and Sander</label><mixed-citation>
      
Winiberg, F. A., Percival, C. J., Shannon, R., Khan, M. A. H., Shallcross, D. E., Liu, Y., and Sander, S. P.:
Reaction kinetics of OH+ HNO 3 under conditions relevant to the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20, 24652–24664, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>World Bank Group(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
World Bank Group:
World Bank Open Data, blackboxPlease add the name of the publisher/publishing institution., <a href="https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 July 2026), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Zhang et al.(2023)Zhang, He, Wu, Macdonald, Brook, and Kharol</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, L., He, Z., Wu, Z., Macdonald, A. M., Brook, J. R., and Kharol, S.:
A database of modeled gridded dry deposition velocities for 45 gaseous species and three particle size ranges across North America, J. Environ. Sci., 127, 264–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.05.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.05.030</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
