<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-10947-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Size-resolved isotope analysis reveals anthropogenic reactive nitrogen transport and transformation in Taiwan mountain forests: A case study</article-title><alt-title>Size-resolved isotope analysis of reactive nitrogen transport</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Wen-Chien</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Ming-Hao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Wei-Chieh</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Jen-Ping</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4188-6189</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Lai</surname><given-names>Yen-Jen</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3366-8766</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Haojia</given-names></name>
          <email>abbyren@ntu.edu.tw</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hung</surname><given-names>Hui-Ming</given-names></name>
          <email>hmhung@ntu.edu.tw</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6755-6359</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Experimental Forest, National Taiwan University, Nantou, 557004, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Haojia Ren (abbyren@ntu.edu.tw) and Hui-Ming Hung (hmhung@ntu.edu.tw)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>10947</fpage><lpage>10963</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>August</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Wen-Chien Lee et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e151">Reactive nitrogen (Nr) species such as particulate ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are critical drivers of air pollution and ecosystem health, yet their transformation in mountain forests remains poorly characterized. We performed a one-week field campaign in a subtropical mountain forest at Xitou, Taiwan, using size-segregated aerosol sampling, stable isotopic techniques, and Bayesian modeling. Functional groups were analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR), and isotopes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O were measured using gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) to quantify <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source contributions and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation pathways. During the sampling week, diurnal patterns of higher daytime particle concentrations were disrupted by a 26 h fog event, which suppressed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched urban plume influx and promoted aqueous-phase uptake of isotopically depleted local gas-phase species. Under clear conditions, size-resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited a bell-shaped distribution peaking at the accumulation mode, whereas this gradient flattened during the fog event. Size-resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O signatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> revealed two nitrate formation regimes: urban plumes retained O<sub>3</sub>-driven oxidation signatures with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and rural/local regimes were dominated by RO<sub>2</sub>-involved processes with greater isotopic depletion and/or biogenic contributions. Bayesian source apportionment constrained by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicated 50 %–83 % of NH<sub>3</sub> emissions originated from combustion-related sources. Concurrently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O source apportionment showed RO<sub>2</sub>-initiated oxidation dominated daytime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (42 %–95 %) and heterogeneous reactions contributed 6 %–84 % at night. Although based on a short-term campaign capturing a single fog episode, this case study highlights the value of size-resolved isotopic approaches for characterizing reactive nitrogen transport and evolution under contrasting meteorological conditions, providing mechanistic insights into complex environments.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Science and Technology Council</funding-source>
<award-id>112-2111-M-002-014</award-id>
<award-id>113-2111-M-002-012</award-id>
<award-id>114-2111-M-002-014</award-id>
<award-id>113-2811-M-002-114</award-id>
<award-id>114-2811-M-002-083</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e440">Anthropogenic activities have significantly altered the global reactive nitrogen (Nr) cycle, with profound implications for climate change (Pinder et al., 2012), biodiversity loss (Humbert et al., 2016), acid deposition (Doney et al., 2007), and regional air quality degradation (Cheng et al., 2016). Among Nr species, particulate ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) derived from ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) and nitrogen oxides (NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>), respectively, are major pollutants that degrade visibility and increase human morbidity (Gong et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2017). In Asian regions, these species account for approximately 10 %–37 % of non-refractory PM<sub>1</sub> (particulate matter with a diameter less than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) mass (Zhou et al., 2020). While anthropogenic Nr is frequently transported to rural and remote areas, its distribution remains heterogeneous, exacerbating regional disparities in nitrogen deposition and environmental impacts (Galloway et al., 2008). Therefore, understanding the formation pathways, transport mechanisms, and sources of Nr is essential for evaluating its origins and ecological impacts.</p>
      <p id="d2e517">Nr is emitted from a diverse array of anthropogenic and biogenic sources. NH<sub>3</sub> is predominantly released from agricultural activities and is removed through dry deposition, precipitation scavenging, and chemical conversion to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via reactions with acidic precursors from NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) oxidations (Meng et al., 2017). Sources of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> include coal combustion, vehicle exhausts, biomass burning, and soil emissions (Fan et al., 2020). In the presence of sunlight, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> undergoes rapid oxidation through ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) or peroxy radical (RO<sub>2</sub>) pathways (termed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) before converting to nitric acid (HNO<sub>3</sub>) via the following reactions: 

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M48" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">or</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">or</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Tropospheric O<sub>3</sub> is a key oxidant formed from the photolysis of NO<sub>2</sub> (Haagen-Smit et al., 1953). Another important oxidant is the RO<sub>2</sub> radical, which is primarily formed through the reaction of VOC with hydroxyl radicals (OH) and might be more abundant in forested environments (Romer et al., 2016). Under nocturnal or low-light conditions, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> accumulates as nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) through reaction with O<sub>3</sub>, which then undergoes heterogeneous reactions (termed as het) to produce HNO<sub>3</sub> as follows:

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M56" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">surface</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        These oxidation processes leave distinct isotopic signatures for nitrate, making stable isotope analysis a robust tool for tracing the evolution of aerosol particles (Moore, 1977). Nitrogen isotope ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)/(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 ‰, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are used to distinguish emission sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Savard et al., 2017; Chang et al., 2018), while oxygen isotope ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VSMOW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 ‰, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of <sup>18</sup>O/<sup>16</sup>O and VSMOW is the Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provide insights into specific oxidation pathways, as each oxidant (O<sub>3</sub>, OH, RO<sub>2</sub>) imparts a unique isotopic fingerprint (Walters and Michalski, 2016). Although isotopic Bayesian mixing model frameworks (e.g., IsoSource, SIAR, or MixSIAR) have successfully identified the sources of Nr and the formation mechanisms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fan et al., 2020; Chang et al., 2018; Kawashima et al., 2023; Pan et al., 2016), these processes are highly variable in complex terrains. Little is known about the sources and atmospheric processing of Nr in East Asian mountain forests, where local emissions and transported pollutants interact under high-humidity conditions (Guha et al., 2017). During transport, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values are modified by kinetic fractionation and gas-particle partitioning, often leading to a progressive depletion of heavier isotopes (Gobel et al., 2013; Walters and Michalski, 2016). Furthermore, the typically low concentrations of mountain aerosols have historically limited detailed size-segregated isotopic analyses, constraining our understanding of emission sources and size-dependent nitrogen transformation pathways (Morin et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d2e1254">Xitou, a representative cloud forest in central Taiwan, offers a suitable field setting to investigate these gaps. The site is situated at 1179 m a.s.l. in a valley-basin terrain enclosed on three sides by higher mountain ridges (up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000–3000 m a.s.l.) to the south, east, and west, with a topographic opening toward the northwest facing urbanized and agricultural lowlands. This specialized geographic configuration drives predictable valley-mountain breeze circulations that transport anthropogenic plumes into a biogenic-rich environment where Nr accounts for 13 %–23 % of PM<sub>10</sub> mass (Chen et al., 2021). The densely vegetated catchment and enclosed terrain promote the accumulation of locally emitted biogenic VOCs, supporting active RO<sub>2</sub> chemistry at the site (Salvador et al., 2020). This mixing vessel is characterized by frequent fog and persistent humidity, with a mean relative humidity (RH) above 80 %. Fog droplets serve as a reactive aqueous medium, facilitating the dissolution of Nr species and accelerating secondary aerosol formation through aqueous-phase oxidation, thereby modifying aerosol hygroscopicity and chemical aging (Ervens, 2015). Specifically, aqueous-phase nitrate formation during fog proceeds via oxidation of NO<sub>2</sub> by ⚫OH radicals and heterogeneous hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> on fog droplet surfaces. Furthermore, NO<sub>2</sub> disproportionation represents an additional pathway, a process enhanced by the larger radii of fog droplets compared to aerosol particles (Zhang et al., 2022; Lin et al., 2026; Yu et al., 2023). In addition, recent field research has demonstrated that efficient nitrate formation during fog occurs mainly on fog interstitial aerosols through NO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> hydrolysis, highlighting the importance of size-resolved characterization of aerosols under fog conditions (Xu et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e1346">While previous work at Xitou has characterized winter Nr sources (T.-Y. Chen et al., 2022), the influence of prolonged fog and stagnant atmospheric conditions on size-segregated isotopic distributions remains poorly resolved. In this case study of a one-week field campaign capturing a rare <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 h fog episode, we examine (1) how prolonged fog modifies the size-dependent isotopic structure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and (2) how the combination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with size resolution resolves the partitioning between O<sub>3</sub>- and RO<sub>2</sub>-initiated nitrate formation pathways. By combining size-segregated sampling with Bayesian source apportionment, we evaluate the relative contributions of NH<sub>3</sub> emission sources and evaluate how fog conditions modulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site description and sampling</title>
      <p id="d2e1484">Field measurements were conducted from 17 to 24 April 2021 at the Xitou Experimental Forest of National Taiwan University (23°40<sup>′</sup>12<sup>′′</sup> N, 120°47<sup>′</sup>54<sup>′′</sup> E, 1179 m a.s.l.; Fig. S1). April represents the spring transition in Taiwan, a period characterized by frequent fog at Xitou, and a shift in aerosol loading from wintertime maxima to summertime minima. Size-segregated aerosol samples were collected during alternating daytime (09:00 to 17:00 LT, denoted as “D”) and nighttime (18:00 to 06:00 LT on the following day, denoted as “N”) intervals using a micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI, Model 125R, MSP Corporation, Shoreview, Minnesota, USA). The MOUDI was operated at a flow rate of 30 L min<sup>−1</sup>, with aerodynamic cut-point diameters of 0.056, 0.1, 0.18, 0.32, 0.56, 1.0, 1.8, 3.2, 5.6, and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The higher flow rate (30 vs. 10 L min<sup>−1</sup>) relative to the prior winter study yielded greater particle mass for analysis. Sampling was conducted on 46.2 mm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filters (Whatman 7592-104) labeled by day and night intervals (e.g., “17D”). Samples were sealed in aluminum foil and stored at 4 °C prior to analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e1562">Meteorological parameters, including pressure, temperature, RH, trace gases, visibility, and radiation, were monitored by a custom-built Air Quality Box (AQB) and the on-site Agricultural Meteorological Station. Among the trace gases measured by AQB, carbon monoxide (CO) was selected as the primary tracer for analysis due to its reliable calibration (W.-C. Huang et al., 2024).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Sample analysis and isotope measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e1573">The analytical workflow involved: concentration screening, aqueous extraction, and isotopic measurements (Fig. 1). Initially, attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR, Nicolet 6700, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) was used to semi-quantitatively screen filters for sufficient nitrogen content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M N as NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with details in Supplement Description S1). Filters from adjacent size bins with insufficient loading were combined, and a mass-weighted diameter was calculated as detailed in Supplement Description S2.</p>
      <p id="d2e1625">Filters were extracted in 30 mL Milli-Q water (18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 25 °C) using 30 min ultrasonication, followed by filtering through 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m Millipore syringe filters. Total nitrogen (TN) was determined by oxidizing part of the extracts to nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using potassium persulfate. The bacterial denitrifier method was subsequently employed to measure the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of TN, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O of nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> nitrite (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NN). Two bacterial strains were employed: <italic>Pseudomonas chlororaphis</italic> (ATCC<sup>®</sup> 43928™, Manassas, VA, USA) for TN analysis and <italic>Pseudomonas chlororaphis ssp. aureofaciens</italic> (ATCC<sup>®</sup> 13985™, Manassas, VA, USA) for NN analysis to convert NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) gas while preserving isotopic integrity (Weigand et al., 2016). Isotopic ratios of N<sub>2</sub>O were measured via gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) and calibrated against international isotope standards: USGS 34 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 ‰; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.93 ‰) and IAEA-NO<sub>3</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.7 ‰; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.61 ‰) (Böhlke et al., 2003). Detailed descriptions of isotope measurement procedures can be found in T.-Y. Chen et al. (2022).</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1884">Schematic diagram of sampling and isotope analysis procedures.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1894">Given that NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations detected by IC analysis were negligible, NN values were considered as representative of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). If TN primarily comprises NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NN, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated via mass balance: 

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M157" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the molarities of TN and NN, respectively, measured by the photolytic NO/NO<sub>2</sub>/NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> analyzer (NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> box, Model T200P, Teledyne API). Stringent quality control was applied: data points were excluded if NN exceeded 80 % of TN or if NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was less than 60 % of water-soluble reduced nitrogen (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The latter criterion was based on the assumption that contributions from organic nitrogen were negligible under these conditions. The NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was determined on a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi F-2700) using a fluorometric method (Holmes et al., 1999).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Bayesian isotope mixing model framework (MixSIAR)</title>
      <p id="d2e2233">Source contributions of NH<sub>3</sub> and the formation pathways of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were estimated using the MixSIAR framework (v3.1.12), which employs Bayesian models to estimate source contributions while accounting for uncertainties in source values (Stock et al., 2018). The model follows the general form as follows:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M169" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">err</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured isotope value of tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the proportion of source <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the isotope value of tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of source <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (as a normal distribution with mean values and standard deviations), and err<sub><italic>i</italic><italic>j</italic></sub> is the residual error. The model was run with extended Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) parameters to ensure convergence, with all runs confirmed to have converged based on the Gelman-Rubin potential scale reduction factor and the Geweke diagnostic (Stock and Semmens, 2016). Results are reported as mean source contributions with associated standard deviations. To further assess model performance, reconstructed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated by weighting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the model-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and compared to the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Source apportionments of NH<sub>3</sub></title>
      <p id="d2e2538">To account for isotopic fractionation during the NH<sub>3</sub> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition, the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<sub>3</sub> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was estimated from the concentration-weighted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> following Pan et al. (2016):

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M198" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the isotope fractionation constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 ‰ for equilibrium isotope effect (EIE) between NH<sub>3(g)</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><sub>(aq∕s)</sub>) (Heaton et al., 1997), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the NH<sub>3</sub>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system. Sensitivity tests regarding the temperature dependence, gas<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>particle equilibrium, and the approximation of equilibrium on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were performed, as detailed in Supplement Description S3 and Table S1 (Chang et al., 2025). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were derived from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model (version 4.7.1), incorporating meteorological data from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model (version 3.7.1). The anthropogenic emission database was from the Taiwan Emission Data System (version 12) (Tsai et al., 2024) while biogenic VOC emissions were calculated with the Model of Emission of Gases and Aerosols from Nature algorithm (MEGAN, version 2.04) (Tsai et al., 2015). Concentrations of NH<sub>3</sub> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were simulated using the SAPRC99-AERO5 chemical mechanism, in which inorganic gas-particle partitioning of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was computed by the ISORROPIA thermodynamic equilibrium module embedded within AERO5. The model-simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations agreed with laboratory measurements within a 20 % uncertainty range (Fig. S2).</p>
      <p id="d2e2944">For NH<sub>3</sub> source apportionment, four major emission sources were considered: fertilizer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.8 ‰), waste (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.6 ‰), NH<sub>3</sub> slip (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5 ‰), and fossil fuel emissions (1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.2 ‰) (Kawashima et al., 2023). These sources can be categorized into two groups based on their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<sub>3</sub> signatures: (1) volatilization-related sources (fertilizer and waste) with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<sub>3</sub> values, and (2) combustion-related sources (NH<sub>3</sub> slip and fossil fuel emissions) with higher values (Z.-L. Chen et al., 2022). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<sub>3</sub> obtained using passive techniques was adjusted by 15 ‰ to account for systematic differences between collection methods (Kawashima et al., 2023; Walters et al., 2020). Statistical values for MixSIAR analysis are provided in Table S2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Estimating formation pathways of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e3112"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is applied to evaluate the relative contributions of various HNO<sub>3</sub> formation. Six potential pathways were considered by combining the primary oxidants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with three terminal mechanisms (OH1, OH2, and heterogeneous processes (het)). These pathways are characterized by their specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures (Fig. S3), calculated using a mass-balance approach assuming no kinetic isotope fractionation (Walters and Michalski, 2016). RO<sub>2</sub> was assigned a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O of 23.5 ‰, reflecting that O in RO<sub>2</sub> originates from O<sub>2</sub> (Kroopnick and Craig, 1972). O<sub>3</sub> exhibits elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values ranging from 90 ‰ to 122 ‰ (Hastings et al., 2003). OH radicals were split into OH1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 ‰ to 0 ‰) (Dubey et al., 1997), and OH2 (38 ‰ to 61 ‰). Daytime mechanisms included <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (33 ‰–49 ‰), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (50 ‰–69 ‰), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (55 ‰–81 ‰), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (73 ‰–102 ‰). Nighttime analysis focused on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (50 ‰–69 ‰) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (73 ‰–102 ‰), while retaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to account for residual daytime nitrate that persists into the night. The reaction sequences and resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges for each pathway are summarized in Table 1. Sensitivity analyses regarding pathway exclusion are detailed in Supplement Description S4, Tables S3 and S4.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3412">Summary of the six HNO<sub>3</sub> formation pathways evaluated in this study, defined by their primary oxidant (RO<sub>2</sub> or O<sub>3</sub>) and terminal mechanism (OH or heterogeneous reactions), with the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges calculated using a mass-balance approach assuming no kinetic isotope fractionation (Walters and Michalski, 2016).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="6cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pathway</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reaction sequence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO; NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 ‰ to 0 ‰) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33–49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO; NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O: 38 ‰ to 61 ‰) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50–69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO; NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>2</sub>; NO<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>; N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2HNO<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50–69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>2</sub>; NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 ‰ to 0 ‰) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55–81</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>2</sub>; NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O: 38 ‰ to 61 ‰) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HNO<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">73–102</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>2</sub>; NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>2</sub>; NO<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>; N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2HNO<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">73–102</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Environmental variability</title>
      <p id="d2e4478">Figure 2 shows the temporal evolution of key environmental parameters, including temperature (Temp), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (WS), wind direction (WD), radiation (Rad), visibility (Vis), and carbon monoxide (CO) concentration for the sampling period. During clear-sky periods, the site exhibited pronounced diurnal cycles driven by complex terrain. Daytime temperatures (20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 °C) were consistently higher than nighttime values (15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 °C). Conversely, RH peaked at night (99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %) and reached a minimum during daytime (87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 %). Wind patterns followed typical valley-mountain circulation, with daytime valley winds predominant from the north (316–33°) while nighttime mountain breezes shifted to the southeast (124–179°), consistent with previous observations (Chen et al., 2021). This circulation, often coupled with sea breezes, facilitated the diurnal upslope transport of air masses from low-altitude urban areas toward the mountain forest, likely introducing anthropogenic pollutants. This transport mechanism is further evidenced by CO concentrations, a reliable tracer of combustion emissions, which were consistently higher during the daytime (0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 ppm) than at nighttime (0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 ppm).</p>
      <p id="d2e4524">A significant departure from these typical diurnal patterns occurred during a prolonged fog episode lasting approximately 26 h (from 18 April 12:00 to 19 April 14:00 LT). This event was characterized by visibility below 1000 m and RH exceeding 90 % for at least one hour. During this episode, the local atmosphere became exceptionally stagnant: Mean wind speed decreased from 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 to 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 m s<sup>−1</sup>, with approximately 25 % of observations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 m s<sup>−1</sup>. Temperature (15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 °C) and RH (99.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 %) remained relatively stable, effectively locking the meteorological state. Notably, CO concentrations during the foggy night (0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 ppm) remained as high as clear-daytime levels. This lack of nocturnal ventilation suggests that pollutants were trapped within the valley, creating a quasi-closed system highly conducive to in-situ chemical transformations and aqueous-phase processing.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e4596">Time series of various environmental parameters measured from 17–24 April 2021, including <bold>(a)</bold> temperature (Temp) and relative humidity (RH), <bold>(b)</bold> wind speed (WS) and wind direction (WD), <bold>(c)</bold> radiation (Rad), <bold>(d)</bold> visibility (Vis), and <bold>(e)</bold> CO concentration. The concentration-weighted isotope values for <bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(g)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(h)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over daytime (09:00–17:00 LT, D) and nighttime (18:00–06:00 LT the next day, N) sampling periods. Uncertainties for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O measurements are generally less than 0.1 ‰ and are smaller than the symbol size.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Size-resolved aerosol chemical composition</title>
      <p id="d2e4730">The impact of the prolonged fog on the mass concentration distributions of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and black carbon (BC) as a function of particle size is shown in Fig. 3 (detailed temporal variation is provided in Fig. S4). Under the clear period (left panels), all four species exhibited higher daytime concentrations than nighttime values. NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and BC peaked in the 0.32–0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m range during the daytime, and shifted to 1–1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m with a broader distribution and lower total concentrations at nighttime. In comparison, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a bimodal distribution, with peaks at 0.56–1 and 3.2–5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m during daytime, shifting to 1–1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m and 3.2–5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m at nighttime. These shifts likely reflect coagulation and hygroscopic growth under elevated nocturnal RH.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4854">Size-resolved mass concentration distributions of particulate <bold>(a, b)</bold> NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c, d)</bold> NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e, f)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(g, h)</bold> black carbon (BC) estimated from FTIR analysis during clear (left panels) and foggy (right panels) periods.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4915">During the foggy period (right panels), sub-micrometer NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased for 18D, surpassing coarse-mode levels. This enhancement likely resulted from the accelerated HNO<sub>3</sub>-NH<sub>3</sub> partitioning, promoted by the high surface-to-volume ratio and elevated water content of sub-micrometer particles during the onset of fog. By 18N, all species shifted to the 1–1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m range, indicating substantial droplet hygroscopic growth and interstitial particle coagulation during the fog period. While total concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained relatively stable compared to 18D, the observed decrease in BC suggests a transition, where aqueous chemistry in the fog droplets compensated for the mass lost to deposition. In the subsequent interval (19D), concentrations of all species decreased, likely resulting from wet deposition of larger droplets and suppressed pollutant transport under stagnant conditions. These observations demonstrate that prolonged fog episodes not only enhance local chemical transformations but also fundamentally alter particle size distributions. Such shifts in composition and size provide the critical framework for interpreting isotopic fractionation and Nr transformations discussed in the following sections.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and derivation of emitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<sub>3</sub></title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e5075">The daily concentration-weighted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at the Xitou site ranged from 6.31 ‰ to 14.69 ‰, with an average of 10.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.76 ‰ (Fig. 2f, calculation details in Supplement Description S5). These results are consistent with previous winter observations at this site (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.7 ‰ to 21.39 ‰, with an average of 11.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.65 ‰) (T.-Y. Chen et al., 2022). As shown in Fig. S5, these values fall between those typical urban-influenced environments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.6 ‰) and remote/forest sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.6 ‰), reflecting the mixed-source characteristics of Xitou (T.-Y. Chen et al., 2022; Kawashima et al., 2023; Hall et al., 2016; Kundu et al., 2010; Moore, 1977; Proemse et al., 2012; Savard et al., 2017; Ti et al., 2018; Walters et al., 2022). This isotopic signature is particularly comparable to other semi-rural receptor sites in East Asia that receive diluted urban plumes mixed with a regional agricultural background.</p>
      <p id="d2e5137">Temporal patterns showed higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the clear period, with daytime and nighttime averages of 11.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.13 ‰ and 12.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.53 ‰, respectively (Table 2). In contrast, lower values were observed during fog, dropping to 7.35 ‰ (18D), 6.31 ‰ (18N), and 9.60 ‰ (19D). This decline of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N during the fog event likely results from several concurrent processes under stagnant conditions: first, stagnant conditions suppressed the upslope transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched urban plumes from nearby lowlands; second, continuous exchange between gas-phase NH<sub>3</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shifts the particle phase toward the signature of the local NH<sub>3</sub> pool, which is depleted in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N due to agricultural volatilization; third, efficient wet deposition during the fog event may have removed early-formed <sup>15</sup>N-enriched particles, forcing the remaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to re-equilibrate with an increasingly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted gas phase; finally, the hygroscopic growth and aqueous-phase processing under fog conditions likely reflect a shift toward equilibrium isotope exchange driven by the NH<sub>3</sub> gaseous-aqueous phase interactions for acidic particles, leading to a smaller gas-liquid isotope fractionation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 ‰ (Walters et al., 2019). This observed decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the foggy period contrasts with our previous study, which showed slight increases during shorter fog events (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h) at the same site (T.-Y. Chen et al., 2022). The exceptionally prolonged duration of the current fog episode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 h) likely allowed for a more complete chemical and physical equilibration between gas-phase NH<sub>3</sub> and the aqueous fog droplets, thereby sustaining isotopic depletion over an extended period. Furthermore, the mass concentrations of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study were nearly double those reported by T.-Y. Chen et al. (2022), indicating a stronger partition of NH<sub>3</sub> into the particle phase, leading to much lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e5428">Concentration-weighted isotope values (unit: ‰) under different weather circumstances.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.72 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.47 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clear day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.13 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53.74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.99 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clear night</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.53 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.59 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Foggy 18D</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.35 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70.44 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Foggy 18N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.31 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33.81 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Foggy 19D</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.60 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33.81 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e5944">Under clear conditions (excluding 19N and 21D), the size-resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution revealed a bell-shaped distribution (Fig. 4). Values peaked at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 ‰ in the accumulation mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and decreased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 ‰ in both the ultrafine and coarse particles. This pattern reflects a transition between local emissions and aged, transported aerosols. For ultrafine mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), particles maintain isotopic equilibrium with the local NH<sub>3</sub> pool, dominated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted residual NH<sub>3</sub> or volatilization sources (typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.3 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.6 ‰). For accumulation-mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), particles preserve the signatures of lower-elevation anthropogenic emission regions. Here, combustion-derived NH<sub>3</sub> (typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.2 ‰ to 1.8 ‰) reacts with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> to form non-volatile ammonium sulfate and ammonium bisulfate. Unlike ammonium nitrate, which is more volatile and easily re-equilibrates with gas-phase NH<sub>3</sub> during transport, sulfate-bound NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more resistant to isotopic re-equilibration, allowing it to act as a conservative tracer of urban source signatures during upslope transport (Wu et al., 2022). For the coarse mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), particles are likely dominated by mineral dust and sea salt and present a substantially weaker thermodynamic sink for NH<sub>3</sub> absorption compared to acidic fine-mode sulfate aerosols (Fig. S6) (Pye et al., 2020). Therefore, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this mode likely maintains a dynamic equilibrium with local gas-phase NH<sub>3</sub>, which becomes progressively depleted in <sup>15</sup>N as the air mass ages.</p>
      <p id="d2e6191">During the fog event, the bell-shaped distribution flattened significantly. Weakened wind suppressed the upslope transport of enriched anthropogenic pollutants, while enhanced aqueous-phase processing promoted uniform isotopic re-equilibrium across all particle sizes. Hygroscopic growth and aqueous processing during fog shifted the dominant partitioning pathway from gas–solid equilibrium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33 ‰) toward a gas–liquid exchange mechanism driven by the NH<sub>3</sub> gaseous-aqueous phase interactions with a much smaller isotope fractionation factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 ‰) (Walters et al., 2019). This reduced isotopic separation between the gaseous and condensed phases, while promoting uniform chemical processing across all size bins, effectively dampens the size-dependent isotopic gradient. Concurrently, the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration from aqueous chemistry can thermodynamically favor the partition of locally-generated isotopically depleted NH<sub>3</sub> into the particle phase, further suppressing accumulation-mode enrichment.</p>
      <p id="d2e6246">The flat <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> size distribution was also observed on 19N and 21D. For 19N, it is likely a legacy effect of the preceding fog period (18D, 18N, and 19D). The NH<sub>3</sub> pool remained isotopically depleted from sustained fog-driven scavenging and re-equilibration, and regional transport had not yet replenished the accumulation-mode signal. However, high sub-micrometer NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Fig. S4) suggests that fog-like aqueous chemistry persisted, maintaining isotopic signatures similar to 18D. Conversely, the flat distribution on 21D reflects a distinct source influence. HYSPLIT back-trajectories (Figs. S7–S8) indicate that the air parcel traveled through agricultural regions characterized by heavily depleted NH<sub>3</sub> (e.g., livestock waste, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.3 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.6 ‰). The partitioning of this isotopically light NH<sub>3</sub> during transit effectively erased the characteristic accumulation-mode enrichment.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e6328"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of size-segregated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during <bold>(a)</bold> clear and <bold>(b)</bold> foggy conditions. The dashed blue line indicates the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for foggy periods. The dotted curve represents LogNormal distribution fits for clear conditions, excluding 19N and 21D, where no distinct bell-shaped size dependence was identified.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and source apportionment</title>
      <p id="d2e6427">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were derived using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values estimated from CMAQ-simulated NH<sub>3</sub> and measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. S9, as described in Eq. 3). The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.55 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.71 ‰, consistently lower than the concentration-weighted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown in Fig. 5a. Based on the derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and assuming a single-source contribution, NH<sub>3</sub> can be mainly attributed to NH<sub>3</sub> slip. However, because real-world air parcels are typically influenced by a complex mixture of emission sources, the MixSIAR Bayesian framework was employed to quantitatively assess multiple source contributions (Fig. 5b). Overall, combustion-related sources (fossil fuel and NH<sub>3</sub> slip) were the dominant contributors to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NH<sub>3</sub>) in the Xitou area, accounting for 50 %–83 % of total NH<sub>3</sub> emissions. During periods with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, such as 17D, 17N, and 19D, fossil fuel combustion dominated (54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %), followed by NH<sub>3</sub> slip (26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %), waste (13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %), and fertilizer (8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %). In comparison, during periods with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the source contributions were more evenly distributed. Fossil fuel combustion and NH<sub>3</sub> slip remain significant, accounting for 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % and 29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %, respectively, while the relative contributions from waste and fertilizer sources increased to 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % and 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 % (Fig. S10).</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e6775"><bold>(a)</bold> Estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Xitou derived from measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and compared with the characteristic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N ranges of NH<sub>3</sub> sources reported in the literature (Table S2). <bold>(b)</bold> Source apportionment results of NH<sub>3</sub> from the MixSIAR framework. Uncertainties of each contribution are shown in Fig. S10.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e6865">It is noted that the temperature effect yields <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranging between 33 ‰ and 37 ‰ (Kawashima et al., 2023), while consideration of gas–particle equilibrium pathways under normal (neutral) and foggy (acidic) conditions would lead to an isotope fractionation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 33 ‰ and 4 ‰, respectively, as described in Sect. 3.3.1. (Chang et al., 2025; Walters et al., 2019). In real-world environments, these two isotope fraction effects likely operate concurrently, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are expected to lie between the estimations derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and 33 ‰. Nevertheless, despite this sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation to those shifting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, the MixSIAR Bayesian model outputs remained consistent with combustion-related sources accounting for 88 %–95 % of total NH<sub>3</sub> emissions (see Supplement Description S3 and Table S1). The persistent dominance of combustion-related sources at this remote mountain site, even during the stagnant fog condition, strongly demonstrates the profound, overarching influence of transport from urban and industrial areas.</p>
      <p id="d2e7025">These findings underscore the need for regional emission control strategies targeting anthropogenic NH<sub>3</sub> sources, which may represent a more cost-effective mitigation strategy for Taiwan, potentially yielding greater air quality benefits than NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> or SO<sub>2</sub> reductions alone (P.-C. Huang et al., 2024). It should be noted, however, that the differences in source contributions between daytime and nighttime periods, or between fog and clear conditions, remain within the overlapping ranges of the posterior distributions; consequently, the current sample number precludes statistically robust discrimination between these conditions. Expanded measurements encompassing multiple seasons and contrasting meteorological regimes would be necessary to establish whether systematic diurnal or fog-driven shifts in NH<sub>3</sub> source apportionment exist at this site.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>3.4.1</label><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e7142">The daily concentration-weighted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.54 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.24 ‰, with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.97 ‰ (Fig. 2g). These values are consistent with those reported in mountain sites such as Mt. Lulin (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8 ‰) (Guha et al., 2017) and the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau (0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.89 ‰) (Lin et al., 2021), as illustrated in Fig. S11. Compared to wintertime measurements at the same site (2.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.20 ‰) (T.-Y. Chen et al., 2022), these lower springtime values likely reflect seasonal shifts in NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> sources and transport-related fractionation. The depletion relative to urban values, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.5 ‰ in Beijing and Gosan (Fan et al., 2020; Kundu et al., 2010), indicates that NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-to-HNO<sub>3</sub> conversion during transport to the mountain receptors is accompanied by progressive isotopic fractionation (Freyer et al., 1993; Gobel et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d2e7260">Under clear conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed minor diurnal variation, with slightly higher values during daytime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.30 ‰) than nighttime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.67 ‰; Table 2), likely reflecting shifts between transported urban and local biogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> sources or the depletion through deposition. During the fog, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased significantly from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.19 ‰ (18D) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.80 ‰ (18N), and further to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.54 ‰ (19D) (Fig. 2g). This decline, contrasting with previous shorter fog events (T.-Y. Chen et al., 2022), reflects the combined effects of prolonged stagnation and a reduced influx of urban air. These conditions promote enhanced aqueous-phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, predominantly driven by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from locally derived biogenic precursors or precursors that have undergone extensive fractionation during transport (Vicars et al., 2013; Gobel et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d2e7408">Relatively low concentration-weighted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed outside the fog periods on 20N and 22N, likely attributable to distinct mechanisms. For 20N, the depletion is linked to enhanced local production, supported by elevated sub-micrometer NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration shown in Fig. S4. For 22N, the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N coincides with significant deposition loss, as evidenced by low total NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. Because HNO<sub>3</sub> readily reacts with coarse-mode mineral dust and sea salt, the deposition efficiency during transport is high; this preferential removal of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched species often leaves the residual nitrate pool isotopically lower. Furthermore, the thermodynamic partitioning of HNO<sub>3</sub>, governed by ambient temperature and particle acidity regulated by sulfate and ammonium, critically influences the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N. Ultimately, the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at this site serves as an integrated signal of physical and chemical dynamics processes within the air parcel during its transit.</p>
      <p id="d2e7522">Size-segregated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.05 ‰ to 0.78 ‰, showing a weak positive correlation with particle diameter (Fig. 6a). Fine particles (PM<sub>1</sub>) had slightly lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.38 ‰) compared to larger, coarse-mode particles (PM<sub>1–10</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.10 ‰), a trend consistent with previous findings (T.-Y. Chen et al., 2022). This size-dependent distribution likely reflects isotopic fractionation occurring during HNO<sub>3</sub> formation and its subsequent partitioning across different size modes. In environments (nearby coast) proximal to major NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> sources, HNO<sub>3</sub> may react preferentially with coarse-mode particles (e.g., NaCl or mineral dust), forming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The residual NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> pool, consequently depleted in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, subsequently forms HNO<sub>3</sub> that condenses onto fine-mode particles as they undergo transport toward the sampling site (Gobel et al., 2013). However, it is important to note that the complex physical and chemical dynamic processes within the air parcel during its transit, as detailed above, may diminish these distinct isotopic signatures under varying daily meteorological conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>3.4.2</label><title>Using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to estimate contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation pathways</title>
      <p id="d2e7764">The daily concentration-weighted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 30.98 ‰ to 73.27 ‰, with an average value of 51.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.47 ‰ (Fig. 2h). Similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, these values align with measurements from other mountain regions such as 10.8 ‰–92.4 ‰ at Mt. Lulin (Guha et al., 2017) and 64.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.52 ‰ at the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau (Lin et al., 2021), but are lower than previous winter observations (72.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.42 ‰) (T.-Y. Chen et al., 2022), as illustrated in Fig. S12. In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at urban sites such as Changchun (68.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.52 ‰) and Beijing (83.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.4 ‰) are substantially higher, consistent with O<sub>3</sub>-dominated oxidation under polluted conditions. The relatively lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at Xitou and other mountain sites suggest that RO<sub>2</sub>-initiated pathways contribute more substantially to nitrate formation under less-polluted conditions. A sharp decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 70.44 ‰ (18D) to 33.81 ‰ (18N and 19D) occurred during the fog, coinciding with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion. This shift from O<sub>3</sub>- to RO<sub>2</sub>-dominated oxidation is likely driven by stagnant winds, suppressed urban input, and enhanced local aqueous-phase chemistry under high RH.</p>

      <fig id="F6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e7981">Size-resolved isotopic composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as a function of mass-weighted particle diameter. <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as a function of mass-weighted particle diameter. <bold>(c)</bold> Two-dimensional plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O across particle sizes. The dotted line provides a visual guide to possible source groupings. The gray boxes labeled “RO<sub>2</sub>” and “O<sub>3</sub>” indicate the potential <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges resulting from reactions with RO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>, respectively.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e8147">Notably, no significant systematic size-dependent trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on particle size was observed (Fig. 6b). The spatial heterogeneity of oxidants (O<sub>3</sub> and RO<sub>2</sub>), coupled with the complex HNO<sub>3</sub> partitioning dynamics within the air parcel, likely erases any size-dependent isotopic pattern and daily variation. However, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship (Figs. 6c, S13, and S14) resolves two geochemically distinct regimes reflecting contrasting formation environments and aerosol histories. The higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (55 ‰–83 ‰) with enriched <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 ‰ to 1 ‰) can be assigned as an urban/transported regime. Freshly emitted in metropolitan areas contributed to elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, while O<sub>3</sub>-driven oxidation leads to high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Gobel et al., 2013). The observed lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (9 ‰–38 ‰) and depleted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 ‰) is assigned as a rural/fog regime. These signatures reflect RO<sub>2</sub>-initiated oxidation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from locally derived biogenic precursors or after extensive fractionation during transport, particularly under stagnant conditions. A moderate positive correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> further highlights the intrinsic interplay between oxidation processes and nitrogen cycling at the site. These data demonstrate a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship that covers a broad isotopic range, spanning from the signatures observed at the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau to those at regional background sites like Mt. Lulin (Fig. S15).</p>
      <p id="d2e8529">Formation pathways of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were quantitatively analyzed using the MixSIAR framework based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, as shown in Fig. 7. During daytime periods characterized by low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (31 ‰–41 ‰) and low CO concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, 17D, 19D, and 23D), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accounted for 82 %–92 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (Fig. 7a and b). These conditions are consistent with periods with limited influence from urban air masses, suggesting the dominance of local RO<sub>2</sub> oxidation processes. In contrast, during daytime with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (63 ‰–70 ‰) and elevated CO concentrations (0.24–0.27 ppm, 18D, 21D, 22D), the dominant pathways shifted toward <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, contributing an average of 29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %, 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %, and 28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %, respectively. This shift probably reflects the enhanced transport of urban air masses enriched in O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> precursors.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e8770">Contributions of nitrate formation pathways estimated by MixSIAR. <bold>(a, c)</bold> Measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values with the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O ranges of potential formation pathways; <bold>(b, d)</bold> estimated fractional contributions of these pathways.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10947/2026/acp-26-10947-2026-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e8819">Although nighttime nitrate formation is theoretically dominated by heterogeneous reactions, our results reveal a more complex process. On nights with elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, heterogeneous pathways (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were the dominant contributors, accounting for 33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 % and 47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation on 19N, 21N, 23N. In contrast, on nights with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (32 ‰–43 ‰, 17N, 18N, 20N, and 22N), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained a major contributor, accounting for 80 %–94 % of formation. This high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution might stem from the residual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from daytime or nighttime ⚫OH generated via reactions between O<sub>3</sub> and alkenes and/or terpenes. The latter pathway is chemically plausible at Xitou given the documented nighttime accumulation of monoterpenes at this site (Salvador et al., 2020) and the known positive correlation between monoterpene concentrations and dark <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical production in forested environments, which likely proceeds via ozonolysis (Kroll et al., 2001; Aschmann et al., 2002; Kanaya et al., 2007; Salvador et al., 2020). However, direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements would be needed in future campaigns to quantify the relative importance of these mechanisms. The weak night-to-night covariation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO concentrations further suggests that nighttime nitrate isotope signatures are governed by the interplay among fog processing, reduced advection, and heterogeneous chemistry, rather than transport intensity alone.</p>
      <p id="d2e9053">A distinct shift in nitrate formation pathways was observed during the fog event. On 18D, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 ‰) and elevated CO concentrations (0.24 ppm) were associated with the dominance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 %), indicating that O<sub>3</sub> from transported urban precursors remained active (Fig. S16). As fog intensified during 18N and persisted into 19D, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values decreased sharply to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34 ‰, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> became dominant (93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % on 18N, and 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % on 19D). This transition is driven by two coupled effects: (1) the attenuation of incoming solar radiation suppresses O<sub>3</sub> photolysis and thereby reduces the availability of high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O oxidants, and (2) the scavenging of upslope transported particles by wet deposition diminishes the influx of urban NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and O<sub>3</sub>. Together, these foggy conditions favor locally derived low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-RO<sub>2</sub> cycling as the predominant oxidant driving nitrate formation. While low values of individual isotopic tracers were occasionally observed during non-fog periods, attributable to source footprint effects or transport-induced fractionation (Sect. 3.3.1 and 3.4.1), the fog episode represents the unique period during this campaign where simultaneous depletion across all three tracers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) occurred with coherent temporal progression. This multi-tracer convergence supports the concurrent operation of several fog-induced processes: intense atmospheric stagnation, progressive wet scavenging, aqueous-phase re-equilibration with isotopically depleted gas-phase species, and a mechanistic shift toward RO<sub>2</sub>-dominated oxidation, all of which are mechanistically coupled to fog conditions rather than to individual source or regional transport effects.</p>
      <p id="d2e9344">Distinguishing the relative contributions helps clarify how nitrate formation processes vary with air mass origin, photochemical activity, and fog processing, which is directly relevant to emission control strategies since the efficacy of nitrate reduction depends on the dominant oxidation pathway. At the global scale, model estimated that the NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ⚫OH (same as our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> hydrolysis (same as our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) pathways each contributed approximately 41 % to tropospheric nitrate formation (Alexander et al., 2020), while observation studies in both urban and mountain environments suggest that heterogeneous pathways become more important for nitrate formation under elevated pollution levels (Fan et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2021). The pathway apportionment presented here provides finer resolution than gas-phase and heterogeneous partitioning by explicitly distinguishing RO<sub>2</sub>- from O<sub>3</sub>-initiated formation, which can be useful in regions where RO<sub>2</sub> oxidation dominates.</p>
      <p id="d2e9478">Beyond inorganic HNO<sub>3</sub> formation, the total particulate nitrogen budget includes particulate organic nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON) species, which can account for 17 %–31 % of total particulate nitrogen (Yu et al., 2024) in mixed urban-biogenic environments, and up to 50 % in urban plumes (Murphy et al., 2025). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON forms via the reaction of NO with RO<sub>2</sub> (NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RONO<sub>2</sub>) during the day, and NO<sub>3</sub> with alkenes and biogenic VOC at night (NO<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> R <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RONO<sub>2</sub>) (Murphy et al., 2025; Ward et al., 2025; Guo et al., 2024). These mechanisms operate through the same RO<sub>2</sub>- and NO<sub>3</sub>-driven pathways identified here (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-OH2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-het</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), suggesting that the oxidation chemistry inferred from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures at Xitou also drives concurrent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON production. Because isotope analysis in this study assumes TN comprises only NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, organic nitrogen contribution could bias the derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> toward the signature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ON. While this was partially mitigated by excluding samples with low [NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of ([TN] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [NN])), future research should prioritize direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement, which would enable the estimation of organic nitrate isotopes via residual mass balance (i.e., [ON] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [TN] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]) and provide a more complete characterization of the Nr budget in mountain forest environments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e9860">A one-week campaign at a subtropical mountain forest in Taiwan revealed that daytime upslope transport of urban plumes consistently elevated particle concentrations above nighttime levels. Conversely, a single <inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 h fog event suppressed urban input and drove progressive isotopic depletion in both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Simultaneously, size-resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures shifted from a bell-shaped distribution with a peak at accumulation-mode under clear conditions to a flattened distribution during the fog event, while a marked decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicated a transition from O<sub>3</sub>- to RO<sub>2</sub>-dominated nitrate formation. Because these distinct signals are easily obscured in bulk measurements, this study underscores the value of size-segregated isotope analysis. Furthermore, Bayesian source apportionment analysis showed that 50 %–83 % of total NH<sub>3</sub> was consistently attributed to combustion-related sources, suggesting that targeting combustion-related NH<sub>3</sub> emissions could represent an effective PM mitigation approach in Taiwan.</p>
      <p id="d2e10000">Overall, this study demonstrates that size-resolved isotope analysis provides process-level insights into nitrogen transport and transformation within a complex, high-altitude forest ecosystem. Nevertheless, certain analytical limits remain: accurate source apportionment of NH<sub>3</sub> and the precise quantification of discrete <inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation pathways remain constrained by simplified equilibrium fractionation assumptions and overlapping isotopic end-members. Future research incorporating direct gas-phase isotope observations and controlled chamber studies of aqueous-phase reactions will help improve the differentiation between urban and biogenic contributions, enabling a more rigorous evaluation of targeted emission reduction frameworks. Finally, as this work constitutes a specialized case study from a short spring campaign capturing a single fog episode, multi-event observations across seasons and contrasting meteorological regimes are needed to establish the broader generality and long-term representativeness of Nr evolution.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e10036">Codes for the MixSIAR model framework are available at <uri>https://brianstock.github.io/MixSIAR/</uri> (Stock et al., 2018).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e10045">The data presented in this study are available in the Zenodo repository at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20787090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20787090</ext-link> (Lee et al., 2026).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sampleavailability"><title>Sample availability</title>

      <p id="d2e10054">Samples are no longer available due to full consumption during analytical procedures.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e10057">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10947-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10947-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e10066">WCL: data curation, formal analysis, MixSIAR analysis, visualization, writing original draft; MHH: laboratory experiments, data curation, formal analysis; WCH: field observations, filter sample collection, laboratory experiments, data curation; JPC: CMAQ modeling and analysis; YJL: meteorological data collection; HR: supervision of isotope measurements and analysis; HMH: project design, project supervision, data discussion, manuscript review and editing. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e10072">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e10078">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e10084">The authors acknowledge Hsu-Hung Lee and Ting-Yu Chen for their assistance with field observations, filter sampling, and preliminary data analysis. We also thank Prof. Jr-Chuan Huang from the Department of Geography, National Taiwan University, for IC instrumentation support, and the administration of the Xitou Experimental Forest, College of Bio-Resources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, for local site support. AI tools (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude) were used to improve the clarity of language; all scientific content was developed and verified by the authors.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e10089">This study has been supported by the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan (grant nos. 112-2111-M-002-014, 113-2111-M-002-012, and 114-2111-M-002-014). W.-C. Lee received support from the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan (grant nos. 113-2811-M-002-114 and 114-2811-M-002-083).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e10095">This paper was edited by Alex Lee and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, B., Sherwen, T., Holmes, C. D., Fisher, J. A., Chen, Q., Evans, M. J., and Kasibhatla, P.: Global inorganic nitrate production mechanisms: comparison of a global model with nitrate isotope observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3859–3877, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3859-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3859-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aschmann, S. M., Arey, J., and Atkinson, R.: OH radical formation from the gas-phase reactions of O<sub>3</sub> with a series of terpenes, Atmos. Environ., 36, 4347–4355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00355-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00355-2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Böhlke, J. K., Mroczkowski, S. J., and Coplen, T. B.: Oxygen isotopes in nitrate: new reference materials for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements and observations on nitrate-water equilibration, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 17, 1835–1846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.1123</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chang, Y., Zhang, Y., Tian, C., Zhang, S., Ma, X., Cao, F., Liu, X., Zhang, W., Kuhn, T., and Lehmann, M. F.: Nitrogen isotope fractionation during gas-to-particle conversion of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> to NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere – implications for isotope-based NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> source apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11647–11661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11647-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11647-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Shao, S., Bao, M., Zhang, C., and Lehmann, M. F.: Nitrogen isotope fractionation associated with ammonia gas-to-aerosol conversion and implications for determining isotopic source signatures and tracing atmospheric ammonium origins, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 22110–22121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11271" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5c11271</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C.-L., Chen, T.-Y., Hung, H.-M., Tsai, P.-W., Chou, C. C. K., and Chen, W.-N.: The influence of upslope fog on hygroscopicity and chemical composition of aerosols at a forest site in Taiwan, Atmos. Environ., 246, 118150, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118150</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, T.-Y., Chen, C.-L., Chen, Y.-C., Chou, C. C.-K., Ren, H., and Hung, H.-M.: Source apportionment and evolution of N-containing aerosols at a rural cloud forest in Taiwan by isotope analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13001–13012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13001-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13001-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Z.-L., Song, W., Hu, C.-C., Liu, X.-J., Chen, G.-Y., Walters, W. W., Michalski, G., Liu, C.-Q., Fowler, D., and Liu, X.-Y.: Significant contributions of combustion-related sources to ammonia emissions, Nat. Commun., 13, 7710, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35381-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-022-35381-4</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Zheng, G., Wei, C., Mu, Q., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Gao, M., Zhang, Q., He, K., Carmichael, G., Pöschl, U., and Su, H.: Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China, Sci. Adv., 2, e1601530, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.1601530</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Doney, S. C., Mahowald, N., Lima, I., Feely, R. A., Mackenzie, F. T., Lamarque, J.-F., and Rasch, P. J.: Impact of anthropogenic atmospheric nitrogen and sulfur deposition on ocean acidification and the inorganic carbon system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 14580–14585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702218104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0702218104</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Dubey, M. K., Mohrschladt, R., Donahue, N. M., and Anderson, J. G.: Isotope specific kinetics of hydroxyl radical (OH) with water (H<sub>2</sub>O): Testing models of reactivity and atmospheric fractionation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101, 1494–1500, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp962332p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp962332p</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B.: Modeling the processing of aerosol and trace gases in clouds and fogs, Chem. Rev., 115, 4157–4198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5005887</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Fan, M.-Y., Zhang, Y.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Cao, F., Zhao, Z.-Y., Sun, Y., Qiu, Y., Fu, P., and Wang, Y.: Changes of emission sources to nitrate aerosols in Beijing after the clean air actions: Evidence from dual isotope compositions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031998, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031998" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031998</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Freyer, H. D., Kley, D., Volz-Thomas, A., and Kobel, K.: On the interaction of isotopic exchange processes with photochemical reactions in atmospheric oxides of nitrogen, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 14791–14796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD00874" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JD00874</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Galloway, J. N., Townsend, A. R., Erisman, J. W., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z., Freney, J. R., Martinelli, L. A., Seitzinger, S. P., and Sutton, M. A.: Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions, Science, 320, 889–892, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1136674</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gobel, A. R., Altieri, K. E., Peters, A. J., Hastings, M. G., and Sigman, D. M.: Insights into anthropogenic nitrogen deposition to the North Atlantic investigated using the isotopic composition of aerosol and rainwater nitrate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5977–5982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL058167</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gong, C., Tian, H., Liao, H., Pan, N., Pan, S., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Kou-Giesbrecht, S., Joos, F., Sun, Q., Shi, H., Vuichard, N., Zhu, Q., Peng, C., Maggi, F., Tang, F. H. M., and Zaehle, S.: Global net climate effects of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen, Nature, 632, 557–563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07714-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-024-07714-4</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Guha, T., Lin, C. T., Bhattacharya, S. K., Mahajan, A. S., Ou-Yang, C.-F., Lan, Y.-P., Hsu, S. C., and Liang, M.-C.: Isotopic ratios of nitrate in aerosol samples from Mt. Lulin, a high-altitude station in Central Taiwan, Atmos. Environ., 154, 53–69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.036</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Guo, F., Bui, A. A. T., Schulze, B. C., Dai, Q., Yoon, S., Shrestha, S., Wallace, H. W., Sanchez, N. P., Alvarez, S., Erickson, M. H., Sheesley, R. J., Usenko, S., Flynn, J., and Griffin, R. J.: Airmass history, night-time particulate organonitrates, and meteorology impact urban SOA formation rate, Atmos. Environ., 322, 120362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120362" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120362</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Haagen-Smit, A. J., Bradley, C. E., and Fox, M. M.: Ozone formation in photochemical oxidation of organic substances, Ind. Eng. Chem., 45, 2086–2089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50525a044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ie50525a044</ext-link>, 1953.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hall, S. J., Ogata, E. M., Weintraub, S. R., Baker, M. A., Ehleringer, J. R., Czimczik, C. I., and Bowling, D. R.: Convergence in nitrogen deposition and cryptic isotopic variation across urban and agricultural valleys in northern Utah, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 121, 2340–2355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JG003354</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hastings, M. G., Sigman, D. M., and Lipschultz, F.: Isotopic evidence for source changes of nitrate in rain at Bermuda, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003789</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Heaton, T. H. E., Spiro, B., and Robertson, S. M. C.: Potential canopy influences on the isotopic composition of nitrogen and sulphur in atmospheric deposition, Oecologia, 109, 600–607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s004420050122</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, R. M., Aminot, A., Kérouel, R., Hooker, B. A., and Peterson, B. J.: A simple and precise method for measuring ammonium in marine and freshwater ecosystems, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 56, 1801–1808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f99-128" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/f99-128</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Huang, P.-C., Hung, H.-M., Lai, H.-C., and Chou, C. C.-K.: Assessing the effectiveness of SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, and NH<sub>3</sub> emission reductions in mitigating winter PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Taiwan using CMAQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10759–10772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10759-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-10759-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Huang, W.-C., Hung, H.-M., Chu, C.-W., Hwang, W.-C., and Lung, S.-C. C.: Deriving the hygroscopicity of ambient particles using low-cost optical particle counters, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6073–6084, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6073-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-6073-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Humbert, J. Y., Dwyer, J. M., Andrey, A., and Arlettaz, R.: Impacts of nitrogen addition on plant biodiversity in mountain grasslands depend on dose, application duration and climate: a systematic review, Glob. Change Biol., 22, 110–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12986" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12986</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kanaya, Y., Cao, R., Kato, S., Miyakawa, Y., Kajii, Y., Tanimoto, H., Yokouchi, Y., Mochida, M., Kawamura, K., and Akimoto, H.: Chemistry of OH and HO<sub>2</sub> radicals observed at Rishiri Island, Japan, in September 2003: Missing daytime sink of HO<sub>2</sub> and positive nighttime correlations with monoterpenes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D11308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007987</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Kawashima, H., Yoshida, O., and Suto, N.: Long-term source apportionment of ammonium in PM<sub>2.5</sub> at a suburban and a rural site using stable nitrogen isotopes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 1268–1277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.2c06311</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Clarke, J. S., Donahue, N. M., Anderson, J. G., and Demerjian, K. L.: Mechanism of HO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> formation in the gas-phase ozone–alkene reaction. 1. Direct, pressure-dependent measurements of prompt OH yields, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 1554–1560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp002121r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp002121r</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kroopnick, P. and Craig, H.: Atmospheric oxygen: Isotopic composition and solubility fractionation, Science, 175, 54–55, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.175.4017.54" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.175.4017.54</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kundu, S., Kawamura, K., and Lee, M.: Seasonal variation of the concentrations of nitrogenous species and their nitrogen isotopic ratios in aerosols at Gosan, Jeju Island: Implications for atmospheric processing and source changes of aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D20305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013323" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013323</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lee, W.-C., Huang, M.-H., Huang, W.-C., Chen, J.-P., Ren, H.-J., and Hung, H.-M.: Size-resolved isotope analysis reveals anthropogenic reactive nitrogen transport and transformation in Taiwan mountain forests: A case study, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20787090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20787090</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y.-C., Zhang, Y.-L., Yu, M., Fan, M.-Y., Xie, F., Zhang, W.-Q., Wu, G., Cong, Z., and Michalski, G.: Formation mechanisms and source apportionments of airborne nitrate aerosols at a Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau site: Insights from nitrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 12261–12271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c03957</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Z., Ji, X., Xu, L., Chen, G., Yang, C., Zhang, K., Zhang, F., Li, L., Chen, Y., and Chen, J.: Enhanced NO<sub>2</sub>-driven multiphase formation of particulate nitrate and sulfate under high-humidity conditions, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 9, 76, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01352-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-026-01352-5</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Meng, W., Zhong, Q., Yun, X., Zhu, X., Huang, T., Shen, H., Chen, Y., Chen, H., Zhou, F., Liu, J., Wang, X., Zeng, E. Y., and Tao, S.: Improvement of a global high-resolution ammonia emission inventory for combustion and industrial sources with new data from the residential and transportation sectors, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2821–2829, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03694" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03694</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Moore, H.: The isotopic composition of ammonia, nitrogen dioxide and nitrate in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 11, 1239–1243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(77)90102-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(77)90102-0</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Morin, S., Savarino, J., Frey, M. M., Domine, F., Jacobi, H.-W., Kaleschke, L., and Martins, J. M. F.: Comprehensive isotopic composition of atmospheric nitrate in the Atlantic Ocean boundary layer from 65° S to 79° N, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D05303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010696" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010696</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, S. E., Buenconsejo, R. S., Draper, D. C., Crounse, J. D., Baliaka, H. D., Ward, R. X., Schulze, B. C., Rezgui, S. P., Ball, K., Susskind, T., Kappaganthula, G., and Wennberg, P. O.: Multi-functional organic nitrogen in the Los Angeles Air Basin, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 2, 2009–2027, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00206" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsestair.5c00206</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Pan, Y., Tian, S., Liu, D., Fang, Y., Zhu, X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Michalski, G., and Wang, Y.: Fossil fuel combustion-related emissions dominate atmospheric ammonia sources during severe haze episodes: Evidence from <sup>15</sup>N-stable isotope in size-resolved aerosol ammonium, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 8049–8056, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b00634</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Pinder, R. W., Davidson, E. A., Goodale, C. L., Greaver, T. L., Herrick, J. D., and Liu, L.: Climate change impacts of US reactive nitrogen, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 7671–7675, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114243109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1114243109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Proemse, B. C., Mayer, B., Chow, J. C., and Watson, J. G.: Isotopic characterization of nitrate, ammonium and sulfate in stack PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada, Atmos. Environ., 60, 555–563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.046</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Alexander, B., Ault, A. P., Barth, M. C., Clegg, S. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Fahey, K. M., Hennigan, C. J., Herrmann, H., Kanakidou, M., Kelly, J. T., Ku, I.-T., McNeill, V. F., Riemer, N., Schaefer, T., Shi, G., Tilgner, A., Walker, J. T., Wang, T., Weber, R., Xing, J., Zaveri, R. A., and Zuend, A.: The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4809–4888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Romer, P. S., Duffey, K. C., Wooldridge, P. J., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., Brown, S. S., Brune, W. H., Crounse, J. D., de Gouw, J., Draper, D. C., Feiner, P. A., Fry, J. L., Goldstein, A. H., Koss, A., Misztal, P. K., Nguyen, T. B., Olson, K., Teng, A. P., Wennberg, P. O., Wild, R. J., Zhang, L., and Cohen, R. C.: The lifetime of nitrogen oxides in an isoprene-dominated forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7623–7637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7623-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7623-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Salvador, C. M., Chou, C. C.-K., Ho, T.-T., Tsai, C.-Y., Tsao, T.-M., Tsai, M.-J., and Su, T.-C.: Contribution of terpenes to ozone formation and secondary organic aerosols in a subtropical forest impacted by urban pollution, Atmosphere, 11, 1232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11111232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos11111232</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Savard, M. M., Cole, A., Smirnoff, A., and Vet, R.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values of atmospheric N species simultaneously collected using sector-based samplers distant from sources – Isotopic inheritance and fractionation, Atmos. Environ., 162, 11–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.010</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Stock, B. C. and Semmens, B. X.: MixSIAR GUI User Manual, Version 3.1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1209993" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1209993</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Stock, B. C., Jackson, A. L., Ward, E. J., Parnell, A. C., Phillips, D. L., and Semmens, B. X.: Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models, PeerJ, 6, e5096, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5096" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7717/peerj.5096</ext-link>, 2018 (code available at: <uri>https://brianstock.github.io/MixSIAR/</uri>, last access: 31 July 2026).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Ti, C., Gao, B., Luo, Y., Wang, X., Wang, S., and Yan, X.: Isotopic characterization of NH<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-N in deposition and major emission sources, Biogeochemistry, 138, 85–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0432-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-018-0432-3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Tsai, I.-C., Chen, J.-P., Lung, C. S.-C., Li, N., Chen, W.-N., Fu, T.-M., Chang, C.-C., and Hwang, G.-D.: Sources and formation pathways of organic aerosol in a subtropical metropolis during summer, Atmos. Environ., 117, 51–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.07.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Tsai, I.-C., Hsieh, P.-R., Hsu, H.-H., Tung, Y.-S., Chen, Y.-M., and Cheng, C.-T.: Climate change-induced impacts on PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Taiwan under 2 and 4 °C global warming, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 15, 102106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2024.102106</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Vicars, W. C., Morin, S., Savarino, J., Wagner, N. L., Erbland, J., Vince, E., Martins, J. M. F., Lerner, B. M., Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., Williams, E. J., and Brown, S. S.: Spatial and diurnal variability in reactive nitrogen oxide chemistry as reflected in the isotopic composition of atmospheric nitrate: Results from the CalNex 2010 field study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 10567–10588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50680" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50680</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W. and Michalski, G.: Theoretical calculation of oxygen equilibrium isotope fractionation factors involving various NO<sub><italic>y</italic></sub> molecules, OH, and H<sub>2</sub>O and its implications for isotope variations in atmospheric nitrate, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 191, 89–101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.06.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2016.06.039</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Chai, J., and Hastings, M. G.: Theoretical phase resolved ammonia–ammonium nitrogen equilibrium isotope exchange fractionations: Applications for tracking atmospheric ammonia gas-to-particle conversion, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 79–89, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00140" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00140</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Karod, M., Willcocks, E., Baek, B. H., Blum, D. E., and Hastings, M. G.: Quantifying the importance of vehicle ammonia emissions in an urban area of northeastern USA utilizing nitrogen isotopes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13431–13448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13431-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13431-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Song, L., Chai, J., Fang, Y., Colombi, N., and Hastings, M. G.: Characterizing the spatiotemporal nitrogen stable isotopic composition of ammonia in vehicle plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11551–11567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11551-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11551-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Ward, R. X., Baliaka, H. D., Schulze, B. C., Kerr, G. H., Crounse, J. D., Hasheminassab, S., Bahreini, R., Dillner, A. M., Russell, A., Ng, N. L., Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Poorly quantified trends in ammonium nitrate remain critical to understand future urban aerosol control strategies, Sci. Adv., 11, eadt8957, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt8957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.adt8957</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Weigand, M. A., Foriel, J., Barnett, B., Oleynik, S., and Sigman, D. M.: Updates to instrumentation and protocols for isotopic analysis of nitrate by the denitrifier method, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 30, 1365–1383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7570" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.7570</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Cao, C., Li, J., Lv, S., Li, J., Liu, X., Zhang, S., Liu, S., Zhang, F., Meng, J., and Wang, G.: Different physicochemical behaviors of nitrate and ammonium during transport: a case study on Mt. Hua, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15621–15635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15621-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-15621-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W., Kuang, Y., Xu, W., Liu, L., Xu, H., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Cheng, H., Zhang, X., Zhai, M., Liu, C., Liang, L., Zhang, G., Luo, B., Tao, J., Liu, J., Zhao, H., Ren, S., Zhou, G., Liu, P., Xu, X., and Sun, Y.: Efficient nitrate formation in fog events implicates fog interstitial aerosols as significant drivers of atmospheric chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 22298–22311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.4c09078</ext-link>, 2024. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Yu, H.-R., Zhang, Y.-L., Cao, F., Zhao, Z.-Y., Fan, M.-Y., and Yang, X.-Y.: Fog event is possibly a source rather than a sink of atmospheric nitrate aerosols: Insights from isotopic measurements in Nanjing, China, Appl. Geochem., 155, 105721, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105721</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Yu, X., Li, Q., Liao, K., Li, Y., Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Liang, Y., and Yu, J. Z.: New measurements reveal a large contribution of nitrogenous molecules to ambient organic aerosol, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 72, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00620-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-024-00620-6</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Hu, X., Sun, W., Yang, Y., Guo, Z., Fu, Y., Wang, H., Zhou, S., Li, L., Tang, M., Shi, Z., Chen, D., Bi, X., and Wang, X.: A comprehensive study about the in-cloud processing of nitrate through coupled measurements of individual cloud residuals and cloud water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9571–9582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9571-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-9571-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Jiang, X., Tong, D., Davis, S. J., Zhao, H., Geng, G., Feng, T., Zheng, B., Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Ni, R., Brauer, M., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Huo, H., Liu, Z., Pan, D., Kan, H., Yan, Y., Lin, J., He, K., and Guan, D.: Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade, Nature, 543, 705–709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature21712</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, W., Xu, W., Kim, H., Zhang, Q., Fu, P., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: A review of aerosol chemistry in Asia: Insights from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts, 22, 1616–1653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00212G" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D0EM00212G</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Size-resolved isotope analysis reveals anthropogenic reactive nitrogen transport and transformation in Taiwan mountain forests: A case study</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alexander, B., Sherwen, T., Holmes, C. D., Fisher, J. A., Chen, Q., Evans, M. J., and Kasibhatla, P.: Global inorganic nitrate production mechanisms: comparison of a global model with nitrate isotope observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3859–3877, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3859-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3859-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      Aschmann, S. M., Arey, J., and Atkinson, R.: OH radical formation from the
gas-phase reactions of O<sub>3</sub> with a series of terpenes, Atmos. Environ.,
36, 4347–4355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00355-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00355-2</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      Böhlke, J. K., Mroczkowski, S. J., and Coplen, T. B.: Oxygen isotopes in
nitrate: new reference materials for <sup>18</sup>O : <sup>17</sup>O : <sup>16</sup>O measurements
and observations on nitrate-water equilibration, Rapid Commun. Mass
Spectrom., 17, 1835–1846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1123</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      Chang, Y., Zhang, Y., Tian, C., Zhang, S., Ma, X., Cao, F., Liu, X., Zhang, W., Kuhn, T., and Lehmann, M. F.: Nitrogen isotope fractionation during gas-to-particle conversion of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> to NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> in the atmosphere – implications for isotope-based NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> source apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11647–11661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11647-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11647-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      Chang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Shao, S., Bao, M., Zhang, C., and Lehmann,
M. F.: Nitrogen isotope fractionation associated with ammonia gas-to-aerosol
conversion and implications for determining isotopic source signatures and
tracing atmospheric ammonium origins, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59,
22110–22121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11271" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11271</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      Chen, C.-L., Chen, T.-Y., Hung, H.-M., Tsai, P.-W., Chou, C. C. K., and
Chen, W.-N.: The influence of upslope fog on hygroscopicity and chemical
composition of aerosols at a forest site in Taiwan, Atmos. Environ., 246,
118150, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118150</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      Chen, T.-Y., Chen, C.-L., Chen, Y.-C., Chou, C. C.-K., Ren, H., and Hung, H.-M.: Source apportionment and evolution of N-containing aerosols at a rural cloud forest in Taiwan by isotope analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13001–13012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13001-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13001-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      Chen, Z.-L., Song, W., Hu, C.-C., Liu, X.-J., Chen, G.-Y., Walters, W. W.,
Michalski, G., Liu, C.-Q., Fowler, D., and Liu, X.-Y.: Significant
contributions of combustion-related sources to ammonia emissions, Nat.
Commun., 13, 7710, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35381-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35381-4</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      Cheng, Y., Zheng, G., Wei, C., Mu, Q., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Gao, M., Zhang,
Q., He, K., Carmichael, G., Pöschl, U., and Su, H.: Reactive nitrogen
chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in
China, Sci. Adv., 2, e1601530, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      Doney, S. C., Mahowald, N., Lima, I., Feely, R. A., Mackenzie, F. T.,
Lamarque, J.-F., and Rasch, P. J.: Impact of anthropogenic atmospheric
nitrogen and sulfur deposition on ocean acidification and the inorganic
carbon system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 14580–14585,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702218104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702218104</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      Dubey, M. K., Mohrschladt, R., Donahue, N. M., and Anderson, J. G.: Isotope
specific kinetics of hydroxyl radical (OH) with water (H<sub>2</sub>O): Testing
models of reactivity and atmospheric fractionation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101,
1494–1500, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp962332p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp962332p</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      Ervens, B.: Modeling the processing of aerosol and trace gases in clouds and
fogs, Chem. Rev., 115, 4157–4198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      Fan, M.-Y., Zhang, Y.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Cao, F., Zhao, Z.-Y., Sun, Y., Qiu,
Y., Fu, P., and Wang, Y.: Changes of emission sources to nitrate aerosols in
Beijing after the clean air actions: Evidence from dual isotope
compositions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031998,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031998" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031998</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      Freyer, H. D., Kley, D., Volz-Thomas, A., and Kobel, K.: On the interaction
of isotopic exchange processes with photochemical reactions in atmospheric
oxides of nitrogen, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 14791–14796,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD00874" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD00874</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      Galloway, J. N., Townsend, A. R., Erisman, J. W., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z.,
Freney, J. R., Martinelli, L. A., Seitzinger, S. P., and Sutton, M. A.:
Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and
potential solutions, Science, 320, 889–892, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136674" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136674</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      Gobel, A. R., Altieri, K. E., Peters, A. J., Hastings, M. G., and Sigman, D.
M.: Insights into anthropogenic nitrogen deposition to the North Atlantic
investigated using the isotopic composition of aerosol and rainwater
nitrate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5977–5982,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058167</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      Gong, C., Tian, H., Liao, H., Pan, N., Pan, S., Ito, A., Jain, A. K.,
Kou-Giesbrecht, S., Joos, F., Sun, Q., Shi, H., Vuichard, N., Zhu, Q., Peng,
C., Maggi, F., Tang, F. H. M., and Zaehle, S.: Global net climate effects of
anthropogenic reactive nitrogen, Nature, 632, 557–563,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07714-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07714-4</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      Guha, T., Lin, C. T., Bhattacharya, S. K., Mahajan, A. S., Ou-Yang, C.-F.,
Lan, Y.-P., Hsu, S. C., and Liang, M.-C.: Isotopic ratios of nitrate in
aerosol samples from Mt. Lulin, a high-altitude station in Central Taiwan,
Atmos. Environ., 154, 53–69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.036</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      Guo, F., Bui, A. A. T., Schulze, B. C., Dai, Q., Yoon, S., Shrestha, S.,
Wallace, H. W., Sanchez, N. P., Alvarez, S., Erickson, M. H., Sheesley, R.
J., Usenko, S., Flynn, J., and Griffin, R. J.: Airmass history, night-time
particulate organonitrates, and meteorology impact urban SOA formation rate,
Atmos. Environ., 322, 120362,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120362" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120362</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      Haagen-Smit, A. J., Bradley, C. E., and Fox, M. M.: Ozone formation in
photochemical oxidation of organic substances, Ind. Eng. Chem., 45,
2086–2089, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50525a044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50525a044</a>, 1953.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      Hall, S. J., Ogata, E. M., Weintraub, S. R., Baker, M. A., Ehleringer, J.
R., Czimczik, C. I., and Bowling, D. R.: Convergence in nitrogen deposition
and cryptic isotopic variation across urban and agricultural valleys in
northern Utah, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 121, 2340–2355,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003354" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003354</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      Hastings, M. G., Sigman, D. M., and Lipschultz, F.: Isotopic evidence for
source changes of nitrate in rain at Bermuda, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,
4790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003789</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      Heaton, T. H. E., Spiro, B., and Robertson, S. M. C.: Potential canopy
influences on the isotopic composition of nitrogen and sulphur in
atmospheric deposition, Oecologia, 109, 600–607,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050122</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      Holmes, R. M., Aminot, A., Kérouel, R., Hooker, B. A., and Peterson, B.
J.: A simple and precise method for measuring ammonium in marine and
freshwater ecosystems, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 56, 1801–1808,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f99-128" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/f99-128</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      Huang, P.-C., Hung, H.-M., Lai, H.-C., and Chou, C. C.-K.: Assessing the effectiveness of SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, and NH<sub>3</sub> emission reductions in mitigating winter PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Taiwan using CMAQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10759–10772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10759-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10759-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      Huang, W.-C., Hung, H.-M., Chu, C.-W., Hwang, W.-C., and Lung, S.-C. C.: Deriving the hygroscopicity of ambient particles using low-cost optical particle counters, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6073–6084, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6073-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6073-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      Humbert, J. Y., Dwyer, J. M., Andrey, A., and Arlettaz, R.: Impacts of
nitrogen addition on plant biodiversity in mountain grasslands depend on
dose, application duration and climate: a systematic review, Glob. Change
Biol., 22, 110–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12986" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12986</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      Kanaya, Y., Cao, R., Kato, S., Miyakawa, Y., Kajii, Y., Tanimoto, H.,
Yokouchi, Y., Mochida, M., Kawamura, K., and Akimoto, H.: Chemistry of OH
and HO<sub>2</sub> radicals observed at Rishiri Island, Japan, in September 2003:
Missing daytime sink of HO<sub>2</sub> and positive nighttime correlations with
monoterpenes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D11308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007987</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      Kawashima, H., Yoshida, O., and Suto, N.: Long-term source apportionment of
ammonium in PM<sub>2.5</sub> at a suburban and a rural site using stable nitrogen
isotopes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 1268–1277,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06311" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06311</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      Kroll, J. H., Clarke, J. S., Donahue, N. M., Anderson, J. G., and Demerjian,
K. L.: Mechanism of HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> formation in the gas-phase ozone–alkene
reaction. 1. Direct, pressure-dependent measurements of prompt OH yields, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 105, 1554–1560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp002121r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp002121r</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      Kroopnick, P. and Craig, H.: Atmospheric oxygen: Isotopic composition and
solubility fractionation, Science, 175, 54–55,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.175.4017.54" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.175.4017.54</a>, 1972.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      Kundu, S., Kawamura, K., and Lee, M.: Seasonal variation of the
concentrations of nitrogenous species and their nitrogen isotopic ratios in
aerosols at Gosan, Jeju Island: Implications for atmospheric processing and
source changes of aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D20305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013323" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013323</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      Lee, W.-C., Huang, M.-H., Huang, W.-C., Chen, J.-P., Ren, H.-J., and Hung, H.-M.: Size-resolved isotope analysis reveals anthropogenic reactive nitrogen transport and transformation in Taiwan mountain forests: A case study, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20787090" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20787090</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      Lin, Y.-C., Zhang, Y.-L., Yu, M., Fan, M.-Y., Xie, F., Zhang, W.-Q., Wu, G.,
Cong, Z., and Michalski, G.: Formation mechanisms and source apportionments
of airborne nitrate aerosols at a Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau site: Insights
from nitrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55,
12261–12271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03957" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03957</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      Lin, Z., Ji, X., Xu, L., Chen, G., Yang, C., Zhang, K., Zhang, F., Li, L.,
Chen, Y., and Chen, J.: Enhanced NO<sub>2</sub>-driven multiphase formation of
particulate nitrate and sulfate under high-humidity conditions, npj Clim.
Atmos. Sci., 9, 76, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01352-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01352-5</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      Meng, W., Zhong, Q., Yun, X., Zhu, X., Huang, T., Shen, H., Chen, Y., Chen,
H., Zhou, F., Liu, J., Wang, X., Zeng, E. Y., and Tao, S.: Improvement of a
global high-resolution ammonia emission inventory for combustion and
industrial sources with new data from the residential and transportation
sectors, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2821–2829,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03694" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03694</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      Moore, H.: The isotopic composition of ammonia, nitrogen dioxide and nitrate
in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 11, 1239–1243,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(77)90102-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(77)90102-0</a>, 1977.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      Morin, S., Savarino, J., Frey, M. M., Domine, F., Jacobi, H.-W., Kaleschke,
L., and Martins, J. M. F.: Comprehensive isotopic composition of atmospheric
nitrate in the Atlantic Ocean boundary layer from 65°&thinsp;S to
79°&thinsp;N, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D05303,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010696" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010696</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      Murphy, S. E., Buenconsejo, R. S., Draper, D. C., Crounse, J. D., Baliaka,
H. D., Ward, R. X., Schulze, B. C., Rezgui, S. P., Ball, K., Susskind, T.,
Kappaganthula, G., and Wennberg, P. O.: Multi-functional organic nitrogen in
the Los Angeles Air Basin, ACS ES&amp;T Air, 2, 2009–2027,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00206" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00206</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      Pan, Y., Tian, S., Liu, D., Fang, Y., Zhu, X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B.,
Michalski, G., and Wang, Y.: Fossil fuel combustion-related emissions
dominate atmospheric ammonia sources during severe haze episodes: Evidence
from <sup>15</sup>N-stable isotope in size-resolved aerosol ammonium, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 50, 8049–8056, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00634</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      Pinder, R. W., Davidson, E. A., Goodale, C. L., Greaver, T. L., Herrick, J.
D., and Liu, L.: Climate change impacts of US reactive nitrogen, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 7671–7675, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114243109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114243109</a>,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      Proemse, B. C., Mayer, B., Chow, J. C., and Watson, J. G.: Isotopic
characterization of nitrate, ammonium and sulfate in stack PM<sub>2.5</sub>
emissions in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada, Atmos.
Environ., 60, 555–563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.046</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Alexander, B., Ault, A. P., Barth, M. C., Clegg, S. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Fahey, K. M., Hennigan, C. J., Herrmann, H., Kanakidou, M., Kelly, J. T., Ku, I.-T., McNeill, V. F., Riemer, N., Schaefer, T., Shi, G., Tilgner, A., Walker, J. T., Wang, T., Weber, R., Xing, J., Zaveri, R. A., and Zuend, A.: The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4809–4888, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      Romer, P. S., Duffey, K. C., Wooldridge, P. J., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., Brown, S. S., Brune, W. H., Crounse, J. D., de Gouw, J., Draper, D. C., Feiner, P. A., Fry, J. L., Goldstein, A. H., Koss, A., Misztal, P. K., Nguyen, T. B., Olson, K., Teng, A. P., Wennberg, P. O., Wild, R. J., Zhang, L., and Cohen, R. C.: The lifetime of nitrogen oxides in an isoprene-dominated forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7623–7637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7623-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7623-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      Salvador, C. M., Chou, C. C.-K., Ho, T.-T., Tsai, C.-Y., Tsao, T.-M., Tsai,
M.-J., and Su, T.-C.: Contribution of terpenes to ozone formation and
secondary organic aerosols in a subtropical forest impacted by urban
pollution, Atmosphere, 11, 1232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11111232" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11111232</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      Savard, M. M., Cole, A., Smirnoff, A., and Vet, R.: <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N values
of atmospheric N species simultaneously collected using sector-based
samplers distant from sources – Isotopic inheritance and fractionation,
Atmos. Environ., 162, 11–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.010</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      Stock, B. C. and Semmens, B. X.: MixSIAR GUI User Manual, Version 3.1,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1209993" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1209993</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      Stock, B. C., Jackson, A. L., Ward, E. J., Parnell, A. C., Phillips, D. L.,
and Semmens, B. X.: Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of
Bayesian tracer mixing models, PeerJ, 6, e5096,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5096" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5096</a>, 2018 (code available at: <a href="https://brianstock.github.io/MixSIAR/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 31 July 2026).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      Ti, C., Gao, B., Luo, Y., Wang, X., Wang, S., and Yan, X.: Isotopic
characterization of NH<sub><i>x</i></sub>-N in deposition and major emission sources,
Biogeochemistry, 138, 85–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0432-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0432-3</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      Tsai, I.-C., Chen, J.-P., Lung, C. S.-C., Li, N., Chen, W.-N., Fu, T.-M.,
Chang, C.-C., and Hwang, G.-D.: Sources and formation pathways of organic
aerosol in a subtropical metropolis during summer, Atmos. Environ., 117,
51–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.07.005</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      Tsai, I.-C., Hsieh, P.-R., Hsu, H.-H., Tung, Y.-S., Chen, Y.-M., and Cheng,
C.-T.: Climate change-induced impacts on PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Taiwan under 2 and
4&thinsp;°C global warming, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 15, 102106,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102106</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      Vicars, W. C., Morin, S., Savarino, J., Wagner, N. L., Erbland, J., Vince,
E., Martins, J. M. F., Lerner, B. M., Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J.,
Williams, E. J., and Brown, S. S.: Spatial and diurnal variability in
reactive nitrogen oxide chemistry as reflected in the isotopic composition
of atmospheric nitrate: Results from the CalNex 2010 field study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 10567–10588,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50680" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50680</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      Walters, W. W. and Michalski, G.: Theoretical calculation of oxygen
equilibrium isotope fractionation factors involving various NO<sub><i>y</i></sub>
molecules, OH, and H<sub>2</sub>O and its implications for isotope variations in
atmospheric nitrate, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 191, 89–101,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.06.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.06.039</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      Walters, W. W., Chai, J., and Hastings, M. G.: Theoretical phase resolved
ammonia–ammonium nitrogen equilibrium isotope exchange fractionations:
Applications for tracking atmospheric ammonia gas-to-particle conversion,
ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 79–89,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00140" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00140</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      Walters, W. W., Karod, M., Willcocks, E., Baek, B. H., Blum, D. E., and Hastings, M. G.: Quantifying the importance of vehicle ammonia emissions in an urban area of northeastern USA utilizing nitrogen isotopes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13431–13448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13431-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13431-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      Walters, W. W., Song, L., Chai, J., Fang, Y., Colombi, N., and Hastings, M. G.: Characterizing the spatiotemporal nitrogen stable isotopic composition of ammonia in vehicle plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11551–11567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11551-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11551-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      Ward, R. X., Baliaka, H. D., Schulze, B. C., Kerr, G. H., Crounse, J. D.,
Hasheminassab, S., Bahreini, R., Dillner, A. M., Russell, A., Ng, N. L.,
Wennberg, P. O., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Poorly quantified
trends in ammonium nitrate remain critical to understand future urban
aerosol control strategies, Sci. Adv., 11, eadt8957,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt8957" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt8957</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      Weigand, M. A., Foriel, J., Barnett, B., Oleynik, S., and Sigman, D. M.:
Updates to instrumentation and protocols for isotopic analysis of nitrate by
the denitrifier method, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 30, 1365–1383,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7570" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7570</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      Wu, C., Cao, C., Li, J., Lv, S., Li, J., Liu, X., Zhang, S., Liu, S., Zhang, F., Meng, J., and Wang, G.: Different physicochemical behaviors of nitrate and ammonium during transport: a case study on Mt. Hua, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15621–15635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15621-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15621-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      Xu, W., Kuang, Y., Xu, W., Liu, L., Xu, H., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Cheng, H.,
Zhang, X., Zhai, M., Liu, C., Liang, L., Zhang, G., Luo, B., Tao, J., Liu,
J., Zhao, H., Ren, S., Zhou, G., Liu, P., Xu, X., and Sun, Y.: Efficient
nitrate formation in fog events implicates fog interstitial aerosols as
significant drivers of atmospheric chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58,
22298–22311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09078</a>, 2024.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      Yu, H.-R., Zhang, Y.-L., Cao, F., Zhao, Z.-Y., Fan, M.-Y., and Yang, X.-Y.:
Fog event is possibly a source rather than a sink of atmospheric nitrate
aerosols: Insights from isotopic measurements in Nanjing, China, Appl.
Geochem., 155, 105721, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105721</a>,
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      Yu, X., Li, Q., Liao, K., Li, Y., Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Liang, Y., and Yu, J.
Z.: New measurements reveal a large contribution of nitrogenous molecules to
ambient organic aerosol, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 72,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00620-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00620-6</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      Zhang, G., Hu, X., Sun, W., Yang, Y., Guo, Z., Fu, Y., Wang, H., Zhou, S., Li, L., Tang, M., Shi, Z., Chen, D., Bi, X., and Wang, X.: A comprehensive study about the in-cloud processing of nitrate through coupled measurements of individual cloud residuals and cloud water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9571–9582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9571-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9571-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      Zhang, Q., Jiang, X., Tong, D., Davis, S. J., Zhao, H., Geng, G., Feng, T.,
Zheng, B., Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Ni, R., Brauer, M., van Donkelaar, A.,
Martin, R. V., Huo, H., Liu, Z., Pan, D., Kan, H., Yan, Y., Lin, J., He, K.,
and Guan, D.: Transboundary health impacts of transported global air
pollution and international trade, Nature, 543, 705–709,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21712" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21712</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      Zhou, W., Xu, W., Kim, H., Zhang, Q., Fu, P., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: A
review of aerosol chemistry in Asia: Insights from aerosol mass spectrometer
measurements, Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts, 22, 1616–1653,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00212G" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00212G</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
