<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-10647-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Compensating biases in CCN predictions from composition averaging and neglected surfactant effects</article-title><alt-title>Composition averaging and effective surface tension in CCN prediction</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Xiaotian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9894-4883</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Curtis</surname><given-names>Jeffrey H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1447-2127</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>West</surname><given-names>Matthew</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7605-0050</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Riemer</surname><given-names>Nicole</given-names></name>
          <email>nriemer@illinois.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3220-3457</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Climate, Meteorology &amp; Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Mechanical Science &amp; Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Nicole Riemer (nriemer@illinois.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>30</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>10647</fpage><lpage>10659</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Xiaotian Xu et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e116">Accurate predictions of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation are essential for reducing uncertainties in aerosol-cloud interactions and climate projections. Most large-scale aerosol models represent particles as compositionally averaged internal mixtures and assume constant surface tension of water, neglecting particle-level compositional variability and surfactant-driven reductions in surface tension. Here we use the particle-resolved model WRF-PartMC to quantify how these simplifications affect CCN predictions by comparing particle-resolved (PR) and composition-averaged (Comp) aerosol populations under constant surface tension (CST) and effective surface tension (EST) treatments. Within this framework, PR-EST case provides the most physically detailed reference, and Comp-CST case represents a modal-like aerosol representation in large-scale models. We find this modal-like representation underpredicts CCN by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 % on average relative to PR-EST reference. This bias reflects two opposing effects: neglecting surfactants suppresses activation, whereas composition averaging shifts activation in both directions depending on particle size and composition. A particle-level decomposition shows that Comp-EST modifies activation through coupled changes in hygroscopicity and surface tension that oppose each other, producing compensating shifts in particle critical supersaturation. These responses produce opposing biases across particle size ranges, with enhanced activation in Aitken mode and suppressed activation in accumulation mode. When EST is included, the remaining bias from composition averaging is substantially reduced, with Comp-EST case differing from the PR-EST reference by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 % in domain-mean. These results demonstrate simplified aerosol schemes can produce apparently reasonable CCN predictions through compensating errors, even when underlying activation physics is misrepresented. Incorporating effective surface tension therefore offers a practical pathway to reduce structural biases in large-scale models.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>U.S. Department of Energy</funding-source>
<award-id>DE-SC0019192</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Science Foundation</funding-source>
<award-id>AGS 19-41110</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e142">Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) exert a strong influence on cloud microphysical properties, radiative forcing, and the hydrological cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.1"/>, making accurate CCN prediction a long-standing objective of aerosol-climate modeling. Despite decades of development, aerosol-cloud interactions remain one of the largest sources of uncertainty in climate projections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.2"/>. A central challenge is the representation of aerosol particle size, composition, and mixing state in large-scale models, which must rely on highly simplified descriptions of an inherently heterogeneous particle population.</p>
      <p id="d2e151">Most global and regional aerosol-climate models diagnose CCN concentrations using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.3"/> applied to composition-averaged aerosol modes or bins, assuming constant surface tension of water and neglecting particle-scale variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.4"/>. This approach collapses a wide distribution of particle sizes and compositions into a small number of internally mixed modes, trading physical realism for computational tractability. Surprisingly, despite these simplifications, modeled CCN concentrations often agree with observations to within a factor of order unity at fixed supersaturation, particularly in aged or regionally averaged aerosol populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.5"/>. This apparent success suggests that simplified aerosol schemes may reproduce CCN concentrations through compensating errors. However, the physical origin of such compensation, particularly the interaction between hygroscopicity, surface tension, and composition averaging, has not been systematically examined.</p>
      <p id="d2e170">Previous work has shown that composition averaging alone can introduce compensating errors in CCN predictions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.6"/>. When particle composition is homogenized within a size mode, some particles experience reduced critical supersaturation and become CCN active, while others experience increased critical supersaturation and fail to activate. The net CCN error is therefore the aggregate result of particle-level gains and losses across the activation threshold. In some cases, these opposing contributions partially cancel, yielding modest bulk CCN errors even when individual particle activation behavior is substantially altered. This mechanism highlights that CCN agreement at the population level may mask significant misclassification at the particle level.</p>
      <p id="d2e176">At the same time, laboratory and field studies have demonstrated that surface-active organic compounds can modify CCN activation by reducing droplet surface tension <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.7"/>, an effect not captured by standard <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory. Effective surface tension (EST) approaches have been proposed to represent this pathway within Köhler theory by accounting for organic surface coverage and liquid-liquid phase separation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.8"/>. These studies consistently show that surfactants can enhance CCN activation, particularly for particles near the activation threshold. However, surfactant effects are almost universally neglected in global aerosol-climate models, which continue to rely on constant surface tension (CST) assumptions.</p>
      <p id="d2e193">From a laboratory and process-level perspective, inclusion of surfactant effects in CCN parameterizations is well motivated. However, large-scale aerosol-climate models do not resolve individual particles but instead represent aerosol populations using internally mixed modes with averaged composition. In such a framework, composition averaging may already introduce compensating biases in CCN activation. Incorporating surfactant effects without simultaneously restoring particle-level compositional variability can therefore alter this balance, potentially degrading apparent agreement with observations despite improving the underlying physical representation.</p>
      <p id="d2e196">Crucially, composition averaging and surfactant effects influence CCN activation through distinct and, in some regimes, opposing physical mechanisms. Composition averaging homogenizes chemical composition within a size mode, redistributing hygroscopic and less hygroscopic components among particles. This tends to increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for initially organic-rich particles while decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for initially inorganic-rich particles, thereby shifting critical supersaturation in opposing directions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.9"/>. In contrast, neglecting surfactant effects implicitly assumes higher surface tension, raising critical supersaturation and suppressing activation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.10"/>. The interaction between these two simplifications has not been systematically examined, particularly in realistic aerosol populations with a mixing state between the external and internal limits.</p>
      <p id="d2e219">In this study, we use output from a regional-scale, particle-resolved aerosol simulation (WRF-PartMC) over California <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.11"/> to examine how CCN biases arise when large-scale model simplifications are applied to a heterogeneous aerosol population. Within our framework, the particle-resolved EST case represents the most physically detailed reference, whereas the composition-averaged CST case serves as an analogue for the modal-like aerosol representations commonly used in large-scale models. Although the EST treatment remains semi-empirical and therefore idealized <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.12"/>, it provides the most physically explicit representation of surfactant effects available within the present modeling framework. We therefore treat the particle-resolved EST case as a best-effort reference within the present framework, while noting that the EST treatment is itself idealized and should not be interpreted as a complete description of interfacial thermodynamics. Its core value lies in allowing us to isolate how including versus omitting those effects changes CCN bias in simplified aerosol representations. The comparison between these two end members therefore provides the most directly relevant measure of model bias.</p>
      <p id="d2e228">To interpret the origin of this bias, we further decompose the problem using intermediate comparisons that separately isolate the effects of neglected surfactant physics and composition averaging. This framework allows us to determine not only whether composition-averaged representations differ from the particle-resolved EST reference, but also which missing processes contribute most strongly to the discrepancy. By linking particle-level shifts in critical supersaturation to bulk CCN errors across aerosol size ranges and mixing states, we show that small aggregate CCN errors can coexist with substantial structural biases in the underlying activation physics, and that surfactant effects can substantially alter the balance of errors in simplified aerosol representations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d2e239">In this section, we define the aerosol representations used to isolate the effects of surfactant physics and composition averaging on CCN activation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). The starting point is a particle-resolved aerosol population obtained from a WRF-PartMC simulation, in which each particle has an explicitly simulated dry diameter and chemical composition reflecting emissions, mixing, and aging processes. Within this framework, CCN activation is diagnosed using either a constant surface tension (CST) assumption or an effective surface tension (EST) treatment that accounts for surfactant-induced reductions in droplet surface tension.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e246">Schematic of the four aerosol representations considered in this study. The top row shows particle-resolved (PR) cases under constant surface tension (PR-CST, <bold>a</bold>) and effective surface tension (PR-EST, <bold>b</bold>). The bottom row shows composition-averaged (Comp) cases under constant surface tension (Comp-CST, <bold>c</bold>) and effective surface tension (Comp-EST, <bold>d</bold>). The red dashed line indicates the prescribed environmental supersaturation (0.3 %) used to diagnose CCN activation; particles with critical supersaturation below this threshold are classified as CCN-active. The schematic particles in the upper-right corner of each panel illustrate how individual aerosols are represented under each scenario: green denotes organic material and the other colors denote the inorganic species. Horizontal comparisons isolate surfactant effects, vertical comparisons isolate the impact of composition averaging, and the diagonal comparison between PR-EST and Comp-CST represents the bias of a modal-like representation relative to the particle-resolved reference.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e267">The top row of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> represents particle-resolved cases: PR-CST (panel a) and PR-EST (panel b). We treat PR-EST as the best-effort physical reference available within our framework and therefore use it as the reference for evaluating simplified cases. We note that the EST treatment is itself idealized and may overestimate surface tension reduction in cases where organic material does not fully partition to the droplet interface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.13"/>. The PR-CST case isolates the impact of neglecting surfactant effects while retaining full particle-level compositional variability. The bottom row represents composition-averaged cases in which particle compositions are homogenized within size ranges. Applying composition averaging under the CST assumption (Comp-CST, panel c) serves as an analogue to modal or sectional aerosol representations used in large-scale models. Composition averaging combined with EST (Comp-EST, panel d) represents a scenario in which surfactant effects are incorporated within a composition-averaged framework. The red dashed line indicates the prescribed environmental supersaturation (0.3 %) used to diagnose CCN activation; particles with critical supersaturation below this threshold are classified as CCN-active. We choose 0.3 % as a representative supersaturation for polluted continental conditions and because it provides a useful threshold for illustrating particle-level gains and losses in CCN activation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.14"/>. Together, these four representations form a two-dimensional design in which horizontal comparisons isolate surface tension effects and vertical comparisons isolate the impact of composition averaging. The resulting differences are quantified as relative CCN biases in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>. In particular, the diagonal comparison between PR-EST and Comp-CST quantifies the bias introduced by a modal-like representation relative to the particle-resolved reference.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Effective Surface Tension (EST) Framework</title>
      <p id="d2e288">To account for surfactant effects, we adopt a semi-empirical effective surface tension (EST) approach described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.15"/> and implemented in PartMC-MOSAIC by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.16"/>. This method assumes liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) where an inorganic core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is partially or fully covered by an organic-rich shell (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The effective surface tension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as a blend of the inorganic and organic phase tensions based on the fractional surface coverage <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M11" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the surface tensions of the inorganic and organic phases, respectively. The fractional surface coverage <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is computed individually for each particle from its simulated composition. Assuming that the entire organic volume of a particle partitions to the shell phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> under LLPS, and that a complete film requires a minimum shell thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the surface coverage of a droplet with wet diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M18" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the organic-phase volume of the particle, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of a spherical shell of thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Particles containing enough organic material to sustain a complete film are fully covered (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differs from particle to particle, organic-rich particles reach full coverage (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) while organic-poor particles are only partially covered; and because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grows as the droplet takes up water, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also vary along each particle's Köhler curve. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.17"/>, we use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mN m<sup>−1</sup> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm.</p>
      <p id="d2e741">Within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler framework <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.18"/>, the EST enters by replacing the constant water surface tension with the composition-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Kelvin term:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M34" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Full details on the implementation in PartMC-MOSAIC and sensitivity tests regarding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are provided in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.19"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Composition Averaging and Size Ranges</title>
      <p id="d2e898">To simulate the simplification used in modal or sectional aerosol schemes, we apply a composition averaging mapping <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.20"/>. The aerosol population is partitioned into three size regimes based on dry diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: Aitken mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> nm), accumulation mode (100 nm–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), and coarse mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m). Within each size range, the chemical composition of individual particles is homogenized. This mapping preserves the original dry diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of each particle but replaces its specific species distribution with the mode-average composition. This procedure reduces particle-to-particle compositional variability within each mode, allowing us to isolate the resulting shifts in critical supersaturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The detailed mathematical derivation of this averaging procedure is described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.21"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Mixing State Index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e989">We use the mixing state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.22"/> as a diagnostic tool to quantify the distribution of chemical species across the population. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the ratio of average per-particle species diversity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the bulk population diversity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M50" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          A value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % represents a fully external mixture, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % indicates a perfectly internal mixture. The selection of species for computing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can depend on specific research objectives, such as elemental composition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.23"/> or hygroscopicity components <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.24"/>. In this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is computed based on hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic components. For each grid cell, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are evaluated from the per-particle species masses in the WRF-PartMC output (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>), giving one value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per grid cell. The index is used only as a diagnostic to interpret CCN prediction errors and does not enter the activation calculations directly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>WRF-PartMC Simulation Data</title>
      <p id="d2e1151">All analyses in this study are based on the per-particle output of a single regional-scale, particle-resolved simulation using WRF-PartMC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.25"/>. For each simulated particle, this output provides its dry diameter, per-species mass, and number concentration, from which all quantities reported here (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CCN concentrations, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are derived. The simulation covers a California domain at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km horizontal resolution. We examine a representative near-surface snapshot at 12:00 LST, 18 June 2010, focusing on land grid cells to capture variability in anthropogenic emissions and aerosol mixing state. WRF-PartMC explicitly tracks the evolution of individual particles through emission, coagulation, transport, and multiphase partitioning of semi-volatile species, providing the heterogeneous particle populations needed for the present CCN analysis. Although this partitioning is treated dynamically within the simulation, our CCN calculations are based on the fixed snapshot and assume that dry particle composition does not change during activation. In particular, the additional co-condensation of semi-volatile and intermediate-volatility organics that can occur as relative humidity increases toward activation is not represented. Such co-condensation would add organic mass to the growing droplets, increasing both the soluble and the surface-active material at the droplet surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.26"/>, and because it preferentially raises the organic fraction, its neglect most plausibly leads the surfactant-related CCN differences reported here conservative. The simulation used here should be interpreted as a process-level case study rather than a climatological evaluation. In particular, new particle formation and biogenic secondary organic aerosol are not included in the simulation. Full details on the meteorological setup, emission inventory, gas-phase chemistry and aerosol thermodynamics are provided in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.27"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d2e1210">The Results section proceeds from mechanism to manifestation. We first show how composition averaging redistributes particles across the activation threshold under CST and EST assumptions, then use a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decomposition to explain the resulting compensation at the particle level. We finally demonstrate how these competing responses translate into bulk CCN biases, including the model-relevant bias of a modal-like representation relative to the particle-resolved reference, and how these biases depend on aerosol mixing state.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Composition averaging under CST: particle-level origin of CCN error</title>
      <p id="d2e1234">We first isolate the impact of composition averaging while retaining the constant surface tension (CST) assumption. The analysis shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> is based on a representative near-surface grid cell from the WRF-PartMC simulation, selected to illustrate particle-level behavior in a polluted coastal region. This comparison separates the structural effect of homogenizing particle composition within size ranges from any surfactant-related changes in surface tension. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> presents a two-dimensional histogram comparing the particle-level critical supersaturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the particle-resolved CST case (PR-CST, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis) and the composition-averaged CST case (Comp-CST, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis).</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1268">Two-dimensional histogram of particles' critical supersaturations before and after composition averaging under the constant surface tension (CST) assumption. The dashed black line shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship. Red dashed lines indicate the environmental supersaturation threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">env</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % used to diagnose CCN activity. Quadrants A and C represent particles that remain inactive or active, respectively, while quadrant B denotes CCN losses and quadrant D denotes CCN gains induced by composition averaging.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1304">The dashed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line separates particles whose critical supersaturation increases after composition averaging (points above the line) from those whose critical supersaturation decreases (points below the line). To diagnose CCN activation, we impose an environmental supersaturation threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">env</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.3 % (red dashed lines), chosen as a representative polluted continental supersaturation and because it places both Aitken and accumulation particles near the activation threshold. Particles to the left of the vertical line activate in the particle-resolved reference case, and particles below the horizontal line activate in the composition-averaged case.</p>
      <p id="d2e1331">This partition defines four quadrants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.28"/>. Particles in quadrant A remain inactive in both cases, while particles in quadrant C activate in both cases. These particles do not contribute to bulk CCN bias despite shifts in their critical supersaturation. In contrast, quadrant B contains particles that activate in the reference case but not after composition averaging (CCN losses), and quadrant D contains particles that activate after composition averaging but not in the reference case (CCN gains). The net CCN bias under CST is therefore determined by the imbalance between particle gains (quadrant D) and losses (quadrant B), consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.29"/>, who found that composition averaging generally leads to CCN overestimation except at very low supersaturation thresholds.</p>
      <p id="d2e1340">This gain-loss framework establishes that bulk CCN bias arises from threshold-crossing behavior at the particle level. We next examine how this balance is modified when surfactant effects alter critical supersaturation through changes in surface tension.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Composition averaging under EST: modified gain-loss balance</title>
      <p id="d2e1351">We next examine composition averaging within the effective surface tension (EST) framework. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> shows the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> comparison between the particle-resolved EST reference (PR-EST, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis) and the composition-averaged EST case (Comp-EST, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis). As in the CST case, most particles cluster near the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line, and the same environmental supersaturation threshold partitions the diagram into gain and loss quadrants.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1407">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> but evaluated within the effective surface tension (EST) framework. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis shows particle-resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> computed with EST (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after composition averaging, also evaluated with EST (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The dashed black <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line and red dashed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">env</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % threshold define the same gain-loss quadrants as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1520">Because surface tension now depends on composition and organic surface coverage, changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are no longer governed solely by shifts in hygroscopicity. The combined influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> modifies the distribution of particles relative to the activation threshold. Compared to the CST case mapping, the imbalance between CCN losses (quadrant B) and gains (quadrant D) is reduced. In other words, when activation is evaluated under EST, composition averaging produces a smaller net gain-loss asymmetry than under CST. This behavior indicates that the CCN bias introduced by composition averaging depends on the assumed surface tension framework.</p>
      <p id="d2e1549">To clarify the origin of this redistribution, we next quantify how changes in hygroscopicity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and surface tension (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) jointly influence critical supersaturation through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Mechanistic decomposition: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> competition in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e1618">To understand why composition averaging produces a smaller net CCN bias under EST than under CST, we examine how changes in hygroscopicity and surface tension jointly influence critical supersaturation at the particle level. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler analytical approximation provides a convenient scaling framework for separating these contributions.</p>
      <p id="d2e1628">Starting from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler analytical approximation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.30"/>,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which holds for small supersaturation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we obtain the logarithmic sensitivity

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M97" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          This expression provides a first-order sensitivity of critical supersaturation to changes in hygroscopicity and surface tension and is used here to interpret the dominant mechanisms driving particle-level shifts in activation.</p>
      <p id="d2e1770">For perturbations at fixed dry diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, this simplifies to

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M99" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          For each particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, composition averaging under EST modifies both hygroscopicity and effective surface tension. Relative to the particle-resolved EST reference state, we define

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M101" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the superscripts “PR” and “comp” denote particle-resolved and composition-averaged populations, respectively, both evaluated with EST.</p>
      <p id="d2e1922">Substituting these perturbations into Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) yields the particle-level decomposition

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          so that the predicted total response becomes

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M103" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pred</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2130">This formulation explicitly separates the EST-consistent perturbation into thermodynamic (surface tension) and hygroscopic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) contributions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2140">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> visualizes this competition by plotting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis for all particles, as well as separately for Aitken and accumulation modes. The origin represents no change in activation properties. Positive values correspond to an increase in critical supersaturation and thus suppressed activation, whereas negative values decrease supersaturation and thus enhance activation.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2205">Particle-level decomposition of changes in critical supersaturation induced by composition averaging under the EST framework, with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis showing the hygroscopicity contribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis showing the surface tension contribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>). Colors indicate the normalized particle number concentration. The origin corresponds to no change in activation properties; positive (negative) values indicate an increase (decrease) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus suppressed (enhanced) activation. The four quadrants identify regimes where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> effects reinforce (Quadrants I and III) or compensate (Quadrants II and IV). The red dashed line marks <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions exactly compensate and the net change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is zero. Panels show all particles and mode-separated subsets (Aitken and accumulation), highlighting the mode-dependent weighting of the compensating regime.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2424">The four quadrants correspond to distinct physical regimes: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2429">Quadrant I (reinforcing suppression): both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and suppress activation.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2458">Quadrant II (compensation): hygroscopicity promotes activation while surface tension suppresses it.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2462">Quadrant III (reinforcing activation): both mechanisms promote activation.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2466">Quadrant IV (reverse compensation): surface tension promotes activation while hygroscopicity suppresses it.</p></list-item></list> When considering all particles together, the compensating regimes (Quadrants II and IV) dominate the distribution, indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions frequently oppose each other. The predominance of compensating regimes reflects the dual role of organic material in CCN activation. Increasing organic fraction simultaneously reduces hygroscopicity (lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and reduces surface tension, producing opposing contributions to the critical supersaturation. This predominance of compensating particle-level responses foreshadows the modal and spatial error cancellation seen in the bulk CCN fields below.</p>
      <p id="d2e2492">When separated by size mode, the dominant compensating configuration differs. Aitken particles are more frequently found in Quadrant IV, whereas accumulation particles preferentially occupy Quadrant II. This mode-dependent partitioning reflects differences in the internal composition variability within each mode and how composition averaging redistributes organic and inorganic material across particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>From particle-level competition to bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: spatial patterns and mode dependence</title>
      <p id="d2e2516">Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>–<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/> established the particle-level mechanisms that govern CCN biases. Composition averaging redistributes particles across the activation threshold (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>), while surfactant-induced surface tension changes introduce an additional response that competes with hygroscopicity (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decomposition further showed that these contributions frequently act in opposition at the particle level (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>). We now examine how these mechanisms manifest in bulk CCN biases across the WRF-PartMC domain.</p>
      <p id="d2e2544">The error metrics reported here refer to CCN concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), not directly to cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC). CCN represents the particles that can activate at a specified supersaturation, whereas CDNC represents the number of droplets that actually form in a cloud parcel. In rising cloud parcels the peak environmental supersaturation adjusts to aerosol loading and composition, which partially buffers CDNC against CCN uncertainties. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.31"/> showed that a twofold uncertainty in CCN typically produces only about a 15 % change in CDNC. The CCN errors quantified below should therefore be regarded as an upper bound on potential CDNC impacts, while still providing process-level evidence of how surfactants may bias simulated aerosol-cloud interactions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2561">Before quantifying regional CCN biases, we first summarize the spatial context of the WRF-PartMC case. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> shows the near-surface total particle number concentration and CCN activation fraction for the land grid cells analyzed in this study. These fields highlight the pronounced contrast between polluted coastal regions and cleaner inland areas, which provides an important background for interpreting the regional error patterns associated with composition averaging and surfactant effects.</p>

      <fig id="F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2569">Spatial context of the WRF-PartMC case over California (12:00 LST, 18 June 2010) for the land grid cells analyzed in this study. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the near-surface total particle number concentration, and panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the CCN activation fraction at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">env</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>3.4.1</label><title>Domain-wide CCN biases</title>
      <p id="d2e2606">We now turn to the central model-relevant question: how large is the CCN bias introduced by the modal-like aerosol representation commonly used in large-scale models?  In this study, all relative differences <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined such that negative values indicate underprediction relative to the reference and positive values indicate overprediction. Based on Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>, our primary metric (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>) is the diagonal comparison between the composition-averaged CST representation and the particle-resolved EST reference, which captures the combined effect of composition averaging and the constant surface tension assumption.

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M132" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            This quantity represents the net bias of a modal-like aerosol treatment relative to the most physically detailed reference available in the present framework. It therefore combines the effects of two simplifications that are usually made simultaneously in large-scale models: composition averaging within size ranges and neglect of surfactant-driven surface tension reduction.</p>
      <p id="d2e2659">To determine which of these two simplifications contributes most strongly to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we define three additional diagnostic relative differences, that isolate individual process contributions:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M134" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>14</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E15"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>15</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E16"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>16</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCN</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the relative CCN difference between the two particle-resolved cases, PR-CST and PR-EST. Since both retain full particle-level composition, it isolates the effect of surface tension alone, i.e., the CCN change caused by using CST (neglecting surfactants) instead of EST (including them). Further, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantifies the composition-averaging bias in the conventional no-film framework, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantifies the residual composition-averaging bias once surfactant effects are included. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is predominantly negative, indicating that the modal-like Comp-CST representation systematically underpredicts CCN relative to the particle-resolved EST reference. The decomposition clarifies why. The surfactant-related term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is uniformly negative, with a domain-mean value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, showing that neglecting surfactant-driven surface tension reduction introduces a broad negative CCN bias. In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is positive on average and reflects the particle-level gain-loss redistribution identified in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diagrams (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>): composition averaging shifts particles across the activation threshold in both directions, producing a positive domain-mean bias (15 %). This positive bias is consistent with earlier findings on CCN errors introduced by composition averaging and mixing state simplification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.32"/>. The new contribution here is to show how this familiar effect interacts with surfactant-induced surface tension reduction in the full bias decomposition. Thus, the modal-like bias does not arise from a single simplification alone, but from incomplete cancellation between two biases of opposite sign.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2921">Spatial distribution of the primary model-relevant CCN bias, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and its decomposition into contributions from surfactant-induced surface tension effects (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and composition averaging under constant surface tension (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">env</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f06.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e2983">This framing also clarifies the practical significance of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>. Compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the residual composition-averaging bias under EST, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is much smaller, with a domain-mean value of only 6.0 % in this case study. Consistent with the particle-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> competition identified in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>, composition averaging under EST introduces opposing perturbations that partially compensate when aggregated to bulk CCN. In other words, once surfactant effects are represented, the remaining discrepancy associated with composition averaging alone is substantially reduced. This does not imply that the Comp-EST representation is a physically complete representation, but it does show that the apparent severity of composition-averaging error depends strongly on whether surfactant effects are omitted. Although the quantitative magnitude of this improvement depends on the adopted EST formulation, the comparison remains useful for identifying how the inclusion of surfactant effects changes the structure of CCN bias within the present framework.</p>

      <fig id="F7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3031">Comparison between the primary model-relevant bias <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the composition-averaging-induced bias under effective surface tension, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">env</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. This comparison isolates the residual impact of composition averaging when surfactant effects are included.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f07.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3079">Taken together, these results lead to two conclusions: First, the negative modal-like bias arises primarily because the Comp-CST representation combines two simplifications, of which neglecting surfactant effects produces the broader and more systematic negative shift. Second, among the simplified representations examined here, Comp-EST is closest to the PR-EST reference. This finding points to effective surface tension as a promising and computationally feasible refinement for large-scale modal aerosol models, even when particle-resolved compositional variability remains unresolved.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>3.4.2</label><title>Mode-resolved CCN biases</title>
      <p id="d2e3090">To understand why the domain-integrated modal-like bias remains negative, we next separate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by particle size mode. All mode-resolved relative differences are computed using the same definitions as in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1"/>, but with CCN concentrations restricted to each mode and normalized by the corresponding mode-specific CCN in the reference case. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> shows that the Comp-CST representation underpredicts CCN relative to the PR-EST reference in both the Aitken and accumulation modes over most of the domain. However, the Aitken mode exhibits positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in polluted coastal regions, indicating that composition averaging locally overcompensates the negative bias introduced by neglecting surfactant effects.</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e3121">Mode-resolved spatial patterns of the primary model-relevant CCN bias <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">env</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, shown separately for Aitken and accumulation modes.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f08.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3156">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> shows how the three component error metrics behave within each size mode. This decomposition reveals that the two simplifications do not merely offset one another in the bulk, but do so in a strongly size-dependent way. Due to the limited number of coarse mode particles in this simulation, coarse mode results are not shown.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e3164">Mode-resolved spatial patterns of CCN relative differences at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">env</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for <bold>(a–c)</bold> Aitken and <bold>(d–f)</bold> accumulation particles. </p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f09.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3194">For the Aitken mode (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>a–c), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistently negative, confirming that surfactants have a stronger influence on activation for smaller particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.33"/>. The composition averaging bias under CST (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) changes sign across the domain: it is positive in polluted coastal regions but negative in many inland areas.  When EST is included, however, the composition-averaging bias <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes positive throughout the domain. This indicates that, in the Aitken mode, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> competition identified in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/> shifts the net effect of composition averaging toward enhanced activation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3258">In the accumulation mode, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains negative, but is substantially smaller in magnitude than in the Aitken mode, consistent with the weaker sensitivity of larger particles to surface tension <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.34"/>. The CST composition-averaging bias, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exhibits the opposite spatial pattern from the Aitken mode, with negative values in polluted coastal regions and positive values inland. Under EST, the composition-averaging bias <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes uniformly negative.</p>
      <p id="d2e3303">The residual composition-averaging bias under EST, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, provides the clearest view of what remains once surfactant effects are represented consistently. In the Aitken mode, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is positive throughout the domain, indicating that under EST the homogenization of composition tends to shift small particles toward enhanced activation. In the accumulation mode, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is uniformly negative, showing that composition averaging continues to suppress activation of larger particles even when surface tension effects are treated consistently. Thus, including EST does not remove the structural bias associated with composition averaging, but it changes its sign and magnitude in a strongly mode-dependent way. This mode-dependent behavior can be related back to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>: while the quadrants indicate the directions of the individual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions, the net effect on activation is determined by whether particles fall above or below the red dashed line. In the accumulation mode (panel c), particles lie predominantly above this line, indicating that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution outweighs the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution, yielding a net increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3400">Taken together, Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> show why apparently reasonable bulk CCN agreement between Comp-CST and PR-EST can be misleading. In polluted Aitken populations, composition averaging can offset part of the negative bias caused by neglected surfactant effects, whereas in the accumulation mode the bias remains negative. The total CCN error therefore reflects partial cancellation across modes rather than uniformly accurate activation physics. The compensation is real, but incomplete: it can improve agreement in bulk CCN while still leaving systematic size-dependent errors in the underlying activation response. In this way, the mode-resolved analysis reinforces the central result of the paper: simplified aerosol representations can benefit from compensating errors, but those compensations do not guarantee physically correct CCN predictions. More broadly, this result suggests caution in interpreting apparently good bulk CCN agreement with observations, since compensating structural errors may mask process-level biases in the underlying activation representation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Mixing state dependence of CCN prediction errors</title>
      <p id="d2e3416">The preceding sections showed that CCN biases arise from particle-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> competition and modal error compensation. We now examine how these effects depend on aerosol mixing state. This diagnostic links the structural simplifications examined above to a widely used metric of aerosol population heterogeneity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.35"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3436">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/> shows the spatial distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> across the near-surface land grid cells. The lowest values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to the most externally mixed aerosol populations (with respect to hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic species), occur primarily in polluted coastal regions, whereas inland regions tend to exhibit higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus more internally mixed aerosol. This pattern is physically plausible: near source regions, freshly emitted particles from different sources remain more compositionally distinct, whereas farther inland atmospheric aging and condensational processing drive the population toward a more internally mixed state. This spatial structure helps explain why the strongest CCN sensitivities to composition averaging and surfactant effects are concentrated near source regions.</p>

      <fig id="F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e3464">Spatial distribution of the aerosol mixing state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the near-surface land grid cells analyzed in this study. Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> regions correspond to more externally mixed aerosol populations, whereas high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> regions indicate more internally mixed aerosol.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f10.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3495">To improve sampling across mixing states, this analysis combines data from two representative time steps (daytime: 12:00 LST on 18 June and nighttime: 00:00 LST on 19 June 2010). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/> shows all four bias metrics as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the total aerosol population. For the three component differences (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the magnitudes decrease monotonically with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both surfactant effects and composition averaging produce the largest CCN biases under strongly externally mixed conditions, and these biases diminish progressively as the populations approach a more internally mixed state. This is physically consistent with the expectation that composition averaging introduces less structural error as particle-to-particle compositional variability decreases. However, their asymptotic behavior differs: the composition-averaging errors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) approach zero as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, whereas the surfactant-related difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) levels off at a finite negative value. This behavior has direct implications for large-scale aerosol models. As composition-averaged representations effectively assume internally mixed populations, the error associated with composition averaging becomes small, whereas the bias introduced by neglecting surfactant-driven surface tension reduction remains finite and may therefore represent a more persistent source of CCN bias.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e3607">CCN relative differences (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PR</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EST</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of aerosol mixing state index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all particles. Black lines indicate binned median values and the color scale represents data density on a logarithmic scale. To improve sampling across mixing states, data from two representative time steps (12:00 LST on 18 June and 00:00 LST on 19 June 2010) are combined.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10647/2026/acp-26-10647-2026-f11.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3673">By contrast, the model-relevant bias <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rep</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains approximately constant and negative across the full range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with binned median values near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. This behavior shows that the overall modal-like bias is not primarily controlled by mixing state in this case study. Rather, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, and the composition-averaging contribution weakens, the persistent negative bias from omitted surfactant effects becomes relatively more important. This finding has an important implication. Improving the representation of mixing state alone is unlikely to remove the dominant structural CCN bias if surfactant effects are still neglected.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e3720">This study examined how two common simplifications in large-scale aerosol models jointly affect predictions of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation: composition averaging within size ranges and neglect of surfactant-driven surface tension reduction. Using WRF-PartMC as a particle-resolved reference, we showed that these two simplifications introduce systematic but opposing biases, so that apparent agreement in bulk CCN concentration can arise from compensating errors rather than from a physically faithful representation of activation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3723">At the particle level, composition averaging redistributes particles across the activation threshold by changing their effective hygroscopicity, while surfactant effects alter activation through changes in surface tension. A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decomposition showed that these contributions frequently oppose one another, producing compensating shifts in critical supersaturation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3740">When aggregated across the aerosol population, these particle-level responses translate into offsetting CCN biases across particle sizes, with composition averaging tending to enhance activation in the Aitken mode but suppress it in the accumulation mode. For model applications, the most relevant comparison is between the composition-averaged constant-surface-tension case, which serves as an analogue of a modal aerosol treatment in large-scale models, and the particle-resolved effective-surface-tension reference. In this comparison, the modal-like representation remains negatively biased overall because the underprediction caused by neglecting surfactant effects is only partially offset by composition-averaging errors.</p>
      <p id="d2e3743">Thus, bulk CCN agreement can be misleading: Total CCN may appear reasonable even when the underlying activation physics is incompletely represented. This may help explain why surfactant-driven surface tension reduction, despite its importance for particle-level activation, has not emerged more prominently in large-scale model evaluation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3747">At the same time, our results show that once effective surface tension is included, the residual bias associated with composition averaging alone is substantially reduced. In this case study, the composition-averaged effective-surface-tension representation is the closest simplified case to the particle-resolved effective-surface-tension reference. This does not imply that composition averaging is physically accurate; rather, it shows that the bias attributed to composition averaging depends strongly on whether surfactant effects are represented consistently. Put differently, a model that includes film/surfactant effects but still composition-averages aerosol may perform much better for CCN than would be inferred from analyses that neglect films altogether. Across the full range of mixing states examined here, the modal-like bias remains persistently negative because reductions in composition-averaging error are offset by the continued influence of surfactant-driven surface tension effects. This suggests that improving the representation of mixing state alone is unlikely to remove the dominant structural CCN bias if surfactant effects are still omitted.</p>
      <p id="d2e3750">Although the magnitude of these biases is case-dependent and the EST treatment is itself idealized, the underlying mechanism follows directly from the competing roles of hygroscopicity and surface tension in Köhler theory and is therefore likely to apply more broadly. This finding suggests that incorporating physically consistent surfactant effects may be an important and practical step toward improving CCN predictions in large-scale models, even when particle-resolved compositional variability cannot be fully represented. Evaluating the extent to which this mechanism generalizes across environments and model frameworks, and its implications for aerosol-cloud radiative forcing, remains an important direction for future work.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e3758">PartMC-MOSAIC (v2.6.0) is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5644422" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5644422</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.36"/>. WRF-PartMC is available upon request from Nicole Riemer (nriemer@illinois.edu).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e3770">The simulation data and the Python scripts to process the data are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-7834698_V1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13012/B2IDB-7834698_V1</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.37"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e3782">Xiaotian Xu and Nicole Riemer conceived and designed the study. Xiaotian Xu performed the data analysis and generated the figures. Xiaotian Xu wrote the initial manuscript draft with guidance from Nicole Riemer. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and to the writing of the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e3788">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e3794">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e3800">This research has been supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research program (grant no. DE-SC0019192), and by the National Science Foundation, Directorate for Geosciences (grant no. AGS 19-41110).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e3806">This paper was edited by Anna Possner and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Andreae and Rosenfeld(2008)</label><mixed-citation> Andreae, M. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bondy et al.(2018)Bondy, Bonanno, Moffet, Wang, Laskin, and Ault</label><mixed-citation>Bondy, A. L., Bonanno, D., Moffet, R. C., Wang, B., Laskin, A., and Ault, A. P.: The diverse chemical mixing state of aerosol particles in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12595–12612, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bzdek et al.(2020)Bzdek, Reid, Malila, and Prisle</label><mixed-citation> Bzdek, B. R., Reid, J. P., Malila, J., and Prisle, N. L.: The surface tension of surfactant-containing, finite volume droplets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 8335–8343, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Ching et al.(2012)Ching, Riemer, and West</label><mixed-citation>Ching, J., Riemer, N., and West, M.: Impacts of black carbon mixing state on black carbon nucleation scavenging: Insights from a particle-resolved model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,  D23209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018269</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Ching et al.(2017)Ching, Fast, West, and Riemer</label><mixed-citation>Ching, J., Fast, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Metrics to quantify the importance of mixing state for CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7445–7458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Cruz and Pandis(1998)</label><mixed-citation> Cruz, C. N. and Pandis, S. N.: The effect of organic coatings on the cloud condensation nuclei activation of inorganic atmospheric aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 13111–13123, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Curtis(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Curtis, J. H.: Particle-resolved aerosol modeling on the regional scale–insights into importance of capturing aerosol mixing state, PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, <uri>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105004</uri> (last access: 27 July 2026), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Ervens et al.(2010)Ervens, Cubison, Andrews, Feingold, Ogren, Jimenez, Quinn, Bates, Wang, Zhang et al.</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B., Cubison, M. J., Andrews, E., Feingold, G., Ogren, J. A., Jimenez, J. L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Coe, H., Flynn, M., and Allan, J. D.: CCN predictions using simplified assumptions of organic aerosol composition and mixing state: a synthesis from six different locations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4795–4807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4795-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4795-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Gill et al.(1983)Gill, Graedel, and Weschler</label><mixed-citation> Gill, P., Graedel, T., and Weschler, C.: Organic films on atmospheric aerosol particles, fog droplets, cloud droplets, raindrops, and snowflakes, Rev. Geophys., 21, 903–920, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Hallquist et al.(2009)Hallquist, Wenger, Baltensperger, Rudich, Simpson, Claeys, Dommen, Donahue, George, Goldstein et al.</label><mixed-citation>Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D., Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H., Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M. E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel, Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D., Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5155–5236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>He et al.(2015)He, Zhang, Glotfelty, He, Bennartz, Rausch, and Sartelet</label><mixed-citation> He, J., Zhang, Y., Glotfelty, T., He, R., Bennartz, R., Rausch, J., and Sartelet, K.: Decadal simulation and comprehensive evaluation of CESM/CAM 5.1 with advanced chemistry, aerosol microphysics, and aerosol-cloud interactions, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 7, 110–141, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Hughes et al.(2018)Hughes, Kodros, Pierce, West, and Riemer</label><mixed-citation> Hughes, M., Kodros, J. K., Pierce, J. R., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Machine learning to predict the global distribution of aerosol mixing state metrics, Atmosphere, 9, 15, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>IPCC(2021)</label><mixed-citation>IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,   3–32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.001</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Liu et al.(2012)Liu, Easter, Ghan, Zaveri, Rasch, Shi, Lamarque, Gettelman, Morrison, Vitt et al.</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W., Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 709–739, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Lowe et al.(2016)Lowe, Partridge, Topping, and Stier</label><mixed-citation>Lowe, S., Partridge, D. G., Topping, D., and Stier, P.: Inverse modelling of Köhler theory – Part 1: A response surface analysis of CCN spectra with respect to surface-active organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10941–10963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10941-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10941-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Moore et al.(2008)Moore, Ingall, Sorooshian, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>Moore, R., Ingall, E., Sorooshian, A., and Nenes, A.: Molar mass, surface tension, and droplet growth kinetics of marine organics from measurements of CCN activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033350" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033350</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Neale et al.(2010)Neale, Chen, Gettelman, Lauritzen, Park, Williamson, Conley, Garcia, Kinnison, Lamarque et al.</label><mixed-citation>Neale, R. B., Gettelman, A., Park, S., Chen, C.-C., Lauritzen, P. H., Williamson, D. L., Conley, A. J., Kinnison, D., Marsh, D., Smith, A. K., Vitt, F., Garcia, R., Lamarque, J.-F., Mills, M., Tilmes, S., Morrison, H., Cameron-Smith, P., Collins, W. D., Iacono, M. J., Easter, R. C., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., Rasch, P. J., and Taylor, M. A.: Description of the NCAR community atmosphere model (CAM 5.0), NCAR Tech. Note Ncar/tn-486+ STR, 1, National Center for Atmospheric Research,  1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/wgtk-4g06" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/wgtk-4g06</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Nozière et al.(2014)Noziere, Baduel, and Jaffrezo</label><mixed-citation> Nozière, B., Baduel, C., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: The dynamic surface tension of atmospheric aerosol surfactants reveals new aspects of cloud activation, Nat. Commun., 5, 3335, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>O'Brien et al.(2015)O'Brien, Wang, Laskin, Riemer, West, Zhang, Sun, Yu, Alpert, Knopf et al.</label><mixed-citation> O'Brien, R. E., Wang, B., Laskin, A., Riemer, N., West, M., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Yu, X.-Y., Alpert, P., Knopf, D. A., and Shiraiwa, M.: Chemical imaging of ambient aerosol particles: Observational constraints on mixing state parameterization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9591–9605, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Ovadnevaite et al.(2017)Ovadnevaite, Zuend, Laaksonen, Sanchez, Roberts, Ceburnis, Decesari, Rinaldi, Hodas, Facchini et al.</label><mixed-citation> Ovadnevaite, J., Zuend, A., Laaksonen, A., Sanchez, K. J., Roberts, G., Ceburnis, D., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Hodas, N., Facchini, M. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Surface tension prevails over solute effect in organic-influenced cloud droplet activation, Nature, 546, 637–641, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Petters et al.(2016)Petters, Kreidenweis, and Ziemann</label><mixed-citation> Petters, M., Kreidenweis, S., and Ziemann, P.: Prediction of cloud condensation nuclei activity for organic compounds using functional group contribution methods, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 111–124, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Prisle et al.(2008)Prisle, Raatikainen, Sorjamaa, Svenningsson, Laaksonen, and Bilde</label><mixed-citation>Prisle, N. L., Raatikainen, T., Sorjamaa, R., Svenningsson, B., Laaksonen, A., and Bilde, M.: Surfactant partitioning in cloud droplet activation: a study of C8, C10, C12 and C14 normal fatty acid sodium salts, Tellus B, 60, 416–431, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00352.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00352.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Pruppacher et al.(1998)Pruppacher, Klett, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Pruppacher, H. R., Klett, J. D., and Wang, P. K.: Microphysics of clouds and precipitation, Taylor &amp; Francis, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829808965531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829808965531</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Riemer and West(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Riemer, N. and West, M.: Quantifying aerosol mixing state with entropy and diversity measures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11423–11439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Riipinen et al.(2011)Riipinen, Pierce, Yli-Juuti, Nieminen, Häkkinen, Ehn, Junninen, Lehtipalo, Petäjä, Slowik et al.</label><mixed-citation>Riipinen, I., Pierce, J. R., Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Häkkinen, S., Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Petäjä, T., Slowik, J., Chang, R., Shantz, N. C., Abbatt, J., Leaitch, W. R., Kerminen, V.-M., Worsnop, D. R., Pandis, S. N., Donahue, N. M., and Kulmala, M.: Organic condensation: a vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3865–3878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Rosenfeld et al.(2014)Rosenfeld, Andreae, Asmi, Chin, de Leeuw, Donovan, Kahn, Kinne, Kivekäs, Kulmala et al.</label><mixed-citation> Rosenfeld, D., Andreae, M. O., Asmi, A., Chin, M., de Leeuw, G., Donovan, D. P., Kahn, R., Kinne, S., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lau, W., Schmidt, K. S., Suni, T., Wagner, T., Wild, M., and Quaas, J.: Global observations of aerosol-cloud-precipitation-climate interactions, Rev. Geophys., 52, 750–808, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Ruehl et al.(2016)Ruehl, Davies, and Wilson</label><mixed-citation> Ruehl, C. R., Davies, J. F., and Wilson, K. R.: An interfacial mechanism for cloud droplet formation on organic aerosols, Science, 351, 1447–1450, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Sareen et al.(2013)Sareen, Schwier, Lathem, Nenes, and McNeill</label><mixed-citation>Sareen, N., Schwier, A. N., Lathem, T. L., Nenes, A., and McNeill, V. F.: Surfactants from the gas phase may promote cloud droplet formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 2723–2728, 2013.  </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Seinfeld et al.(2016)Seinfeld, Bretherton, Carslaw, Coe, DeMott, Dunlea, Feingold, Ghan, Guenther, Kahn et al.</label><mixed-citation> Seinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J., Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S., Guenther, A. B., Kahn, R., Kraucunas, I., Kreidenweis, S. M., Molina, M. J., Nenes, A., Penner, J. E., Prather, K. A., Ramanathan, V., Ramaswamy, V., Rasch, P. J., Ravishankara, A. R., Rosenfeld, D., Stephens, G., and Wood, R.: Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol- cloud interactions in the climate system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5781–5790, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Serrano Damha et al.(2024)Serrano Damha, Cummings, Schervish, Shiraiwa, Waring, and Zuend</label><mixed-citation>Serrano Damha, C., Cummings, B. E., Schervish, M., Shiraiwa, M., Waring, M. S., and Zuend, A.: Capturing the Relative-Humidity-Sensitive Gas-Particle Partitioning of Organic Aerosols in a 2D Volatility Basis Set, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL106095, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL106095</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Sorjamaa et al.(2004)Sorjamaa, Svenningsson, Raatikainen, Henning, Bilde, and Laaksonen</label><mixed-citation>Sorjamaa, R., Svenningsson, B., Raatikainen, T., Henning, S., Bilde, M., and Laaksonen, A.: The role of surfactants in Köhler theory reconsidered, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2107–2117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2107-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2107-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Topping et al.(2013)Topping, Connolly, and McFiggans</label><mixed-citation>Topping, D., Connolly, P., and McFiggans, G.: Cloud droplet number enhanced by co-condensation of organic vapours, Nat. Geosci., 6, 443–446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1809" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1809</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>West et al.(2021)West, Riemer, Curtis, Michelotti, razaveri, Tian, and Arabas</label><mixed-citation>West, M., Riemer, N., Curtis, J., Michelotti, M., Tian, J., and Arabas, S.: compdyn/partmc: Version 2.6.0, Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5644422" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5644422</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Xu et al.(2026a)Xu, Curtis, Yao, Liu, West, and Riemer</label><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Curtis, J. H., Yao, Y., Liu, Y., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Role of liquid-liquid phase separation-induced surface tension changes in cloud droplet activation, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 60, 963–981, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2026.2631789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2026.2631789</ext-link>, 2026a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Xu et al.(2026b)</label><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Curtis, J. H., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Data for “Compensating biases in CCN predictions from composition averaging and neglected surfactant effects”, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-7834698_V1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13012/B2IDB-7834698_V1</ext-link>, 2026b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Yao et al.(2022)Yao, Curtis, Ching, Zheng, and Riemer</label><mixed-citation>Yao, Y., Curtis, J. H., Ching, J., Zheng, Z., and Riemer, N.: Quantifying the effects of mixing state on aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9265–9282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9265-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-9265-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Yu et al.(2020)Yu, Liu, Broda, Joshi, Olfert, Sun, Fu, Coe, and Allan</label><mixed-citation>Yu, C., Liu, D., Broda, K., Joshi, R., Olfert, J., Sun, Y., Fu, P., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Characterising mass-resolved mixing state of black carbon in Beijing using a morphology-independent measurement method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3645–3661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3645-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3645-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Zaveri et al.(2010)Zaveri, Barnard, Easter, Riemer, and West</label><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Easter, R. C., Riemer, N., and West, M.: Particle-resolved simulation of aerosol size, composition, mixing state, and the associated optical and cloud condensation nuclei activation properties in an evolving urban plume, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D17210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013616</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Compensating biases in CCN predictions from composition averaging and neglected surfactant effects</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Andreae and Rosenfeld(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andreae, M. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Part
1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev.,
89, 13–41, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bondy et al.(2018)Bondy, Bonanno, Moffet, Wang, Laskin, and
Ault</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bondy, A. L., Bonanno, D., Moffet, R. C., Wang, B., Laskin, A., and Ault, A. P.: The diverse chemical mixing state of aerosol particles in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12595–12612, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bzdek et al.(2020)Bzdek, Reid, Malila, and Prisle</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bzdek, B. R., Reid, J. P., Malila, J., and Prisle, N. L.: The surface tension
of surfactant-containing, finite volume droplets, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 8335–8343, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Ching et al.(2012)Ching, Riemer, and West</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ching, J., Riemer, N., and West, M.: Impacts of black carbon mixing state on
black carbon nucleation scavenging: Insights from a particle-resolved model,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117,  D23209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018269" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018269</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Ching et al.(2017)Ching, Fast, West, and Riemer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ching, J., Fast, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Metrics to quantify the importance of mixing state for CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7445–7458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Cruz and Pandis(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cruz, C. N. and Pandis, S. N.: The effect of organic coatings on the cloud
condensation nuclei activation of inorganic atmospheric aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 13111–13123, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Curtis(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Curtis, J. H.: Particle-resolved aerosol modeling on the regional
scale–insights into importance of capturing aerosol mixing state, PhD
thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105004" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 July 2026), 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Ervens et al.(2010)Ervens, Cubison, Andrews, Feingold, Ogren,
Jimenez, Quinn, Bates, Wang, Zhang et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ervens, B., Cubison, M. J., Andrews, E., Feingold, G., Ogren, J. A., Jimenez, J. L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Coe, H., Flynn, M., and Allan, J. D.: CCN predictions using simplified assumptions of organic aerosol composition and mixing state: a synthesis from six different locations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4795–4807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4795-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4795-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Gill et al.(1983)Gill, Graedel, and Weschler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gill, P., Graedel, T., and Weschler, C.: Organic films on atmospheric aerosol
particles, fog droplets, cloud droplets, raindrops, and snowflakes, Rev.
Geophys., 21, 903–920, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Hallquist et al.(2009)Hallquist, Wenger, Baltensperger, Rudich,
Simpson, Claeys, Dommen, Donahue, George, Goldstein
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hallquist, M., Wenger, J. C., Baltensperger, U., Rudich, Y., Simpson, D., Claeys, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., George, C., Goldstein, A. H., Hamilton, J. F., Herrmann, H., Hoffmann, T., Iinuma, Y., Jang, M., Jenkin, M. E., Jimenez, J. L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Maenhaut, W., McFiggans, G., Mentel, Th. F., Monod, A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Surratt, J. D., Szmigielski, R., and Wildt, J.: The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5155–5236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5155-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>He et al.(2015)He, Zhang, Glotfelty, He, Bennartz, Rausch, and
Sartelet</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, J., Zhang, Y., Glotfelty, T., He, R., Bennartz, R., Rausch, J., and
Sartelet, K.: Decadal simulation and comprehensive evaluation of CESM/CAM 5.1
with advanced chemistry, aerosol microphysics, and aerosol-cloud
interactions, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 7, 110–141,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Hughes et al.(2018)Hughes, Kodros, Pierce, West, and
Riemer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hughes, M., Kodros, J. K., Pierce, J. R., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Machine
learning to predict the global distribution of aerosol mixing state metrics,
Atmosphere, 9, 15, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>IPCC(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,   3–32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.001</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Liu et al.(2012)Liu, Easter, Ghan, Zaveri, Rasch, Shi, Lamarque,
Gettelman, Morrison, Vitt et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W., Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 709–739, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Lowe et al.(2016)Lowe, Partridge, Topping, and
Stier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lowe, S., Partridge, D. G., Topping, D., and Stier, P.: Inverse modelling of Köhler theory – Part 1: A response surface analysis of CCN spectra with respect to surface-active organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10941–10963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10941-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10941-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Moore et al.(2008)Moore, Ingall, Sorooshian, and
Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moore, R., Ingall, E., Sorooshian, A., and Nenes, A.: Molar mass, surface
tension, and droplet growth kinetics of marine organics from measurements of
CCN activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033350" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033350</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Neale et al.(2010)Neale, Chen, Gettelman, Lauritzen, Park,
Williamson, Conley, Garcia, Kinnison, Lamarque et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Neale, R. B., Gettelman, A., Park, S., Chen, C.-C., Lauritzen, P. H., Williamson, D. L., Conley, A. J., Kinnison, D., Marsh, D., Smith, A. K., Vitt, F., Garcia, R., Lamarque, J.-F., Mills, M., Tilmes, S., Morrison, H., Cameron-Smith, P., Collins, W. D., Iacono, M. J., Easter, R. C., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., Rasch, P. J., and Taylor, M. A.: Description of the NCAR community atmosphere model (CAM 5.0), NCAR Tech. Note Ncar/tn-486+ STR, 1, National Center for Atmospheric Research,  1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/wgtk-4g06" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/wgtk-4g06</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Nozière et al.(2014)Noziere, Baduel, and
Jaffrezo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nozière, B., Baduel, C., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: The dynamic surface tension of
atmospheric aerosol surfactants reveals new aspects of cloud activation,
Nat. Commun., 5, 3335, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>O'Brien et al.(2015)O'Brien, Wang, Laskin, Riemer, West, Zhang, Sun,
Yu, Alpert, Knopf et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Brien, R. E., Wang, B., Laskin, A., Riemer, N., West, M., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Yu, X.-Y., Alpert, P., Knopf, D. A., and Shiraiwa, M.: Chemical imaging of ambient
aerosol particles: Observational constraints on mixing state
parameterization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
9591–9605, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Ovadnevaite et al.(2017)Ovadnevaite, Zuend, Laaksonen, Sanchez,
Roberts, Ceburnis, Decesari, Rinaldi, Hodas, Facchini
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ovadnevaite, J., Zuend, A., Laaksonen, A., Sanchez, K. J., Roberts, G., Ceburnis, D., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Hodas, N., Facchini, M. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and O'Dowd, C. D.:
Surface tension prevails over solute effect in organic-influenced cloud
droplet activation, Nature, 546, 637–641, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Petters et al.(2016)Petters, Kreidenweis, and
Ziemann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petters, M., Kreidenweis, S., and Ziemann, P.: Prediction of cloud condensation
nuclei activity for organic compounds using functional group contribution
methods, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 111–124, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Prisle et al.(2008)Prisle, Raatikainen, Sorjamaa, Svenningsson,
Laaksonen, and Bilde</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prisle, N. L., Raatikainen, T., Sorjamaa, R., Svenningsson, B., Laaksonen, A.,
and Bilde, M.: Surfactant partitioning in cloud droplet activation: a study
of C8, C10, C12 and C14 normal fatty acid sodium salts, Tellus B, 60, 416–431,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00352.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00352.x</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Pruppacher et al.(1998)Pruppacher, Klett, and
Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pruppacher, H. R., Klett, J. D., and Wang, P. K.: Microphysics of clouds and
precipitation, Taylor &amp; Francis, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829808965531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829808965531</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Riemer and West(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riemer, N. and West, M.: Quantifying aerosol mixing state with entropy and diversity measures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11423–11439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Riipinen et al.(2011)Riipinen, Pierce, Yli-Juuti, Nieminen,
Häkkinen, Ehn, Junninen, Lehtipalo, Petäjä, Slowik
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riipinen, I., Pierce, J. R., Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Häkkinen, S., Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Petäjä, T., Slowik, J., Chang, R., Shantz, N. C., Abbatt, J., Leaitch, W. R., Kerminen, V.-M., Worsnop, D. R., Pandis, S. N., Donahue, N. M., and Kulmala, M.: Organic condensation: a vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3865–3878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Rosenfeld et al.(2014)Rosenfeld, Andreae, Asmi, Chin, de Leeuw,
Donovan, Kahn, Kinne, Kivekäs, Kulmala et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rosenfeld, D., Andreae, M. O., Asmi, A., Chin, M., de Leeuw, G., Donovan, D. P., Kahn, R., Kinne, S., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lau, W., Schmidt, K. S., Suni, T., Wagner, T., Wild, M., and Quaas, J.: Global
observations of aerosol-cloud-precipitation-climate interactions, Rev. Geophys., 52, 750–808, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Ruehl et al.(2016)Ruehl, Davies, and Wilson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ruehl, C. R., Davies, J. F., and Wilson, K. R.: An interfacial mechanism for
cloud droplet formation on organic aerosols, Science, 351, 1447–1450, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Sareen et al.(2013)Sareen, Schwier, Lathem, Nenes, and
McNeill</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sareen, N., Schwier, A. N., Lathem, T. L., Nenes, A., and McNeill, V. F.:
Surfactants from the gas phase may promote cloud droplet formation,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 2723–2728, 2013.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Seinfeld et al.(2016)Seinfeld, Bretherton, Carslaw, Coe, DeMott,
Dunlea, Feingold, Ghan, Guenther, Kahn et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J., Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S., Guenther, A. B., Kahn, R., Kraucunas, I., Kreidenweis, S. M., Molina, M. J., Nenes, A., Penner, J. E., Prather, K. A., Ramanathan, V., Ramaswamy, V., Rasch, P. J., Ravishankara, A. R., Rosenfeld, D., Stephens, G., and Wood, R.:
Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol- cloud
interactions in the climate system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5781–5790, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Serrano Damha et al.(2024)Serrano Damha, Cummings, Schervish,
Shiraiwa, Waring, and Zuend</label><mixed-citation>
      
Serrano Damha, C., Cummings, B. E., Schervish, M., Shiraiwa, M., Waring, M. S.,
and Zuend, A.: Capturing the Relative-Humidity-Sensitive Gas-Particle
Partitioning of Organic Aerosols in a 2D Volatility Basis Set, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL106095, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106095</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Sorjamaa et al.(2004)Sorjamaa, Svenningsson, Raatikainen, Henning,
Bilde, and Laaksonen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sorjamaa, R., Svenningsson, B., Raatikainen, T., Henning, S., Bilde, M., and Laaksonen, A.: The role of surfactants in Köhler theory reconsidered, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2107–2117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2107-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2107-2004</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Topping et al.(2013)Topping, Connolly, and
McFiggans</label><mixed-citation>
      
Topping, D., Connolly, P., and McFiggans, G.: Cloud droplet number enhanced by
co-condensation of organic vapours, Nat. Geosci., 6, 443–446,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1809" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1809</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>West et al.(2021)West, Riemer, Curtis, Michelotti, razaveri, Tian,
and Arabas</label><mixed-citation>
      
West, M., Riemer, N., Curtis, J., Michelotti, M., Tian, J., and
Arabas, S.: compdyn/partmc: Version 2.6.0, Zenodo, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5644422" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5644422</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Xu et al.(2026a)Xu, Curtis, Yao, Liu, West, and Riemer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, X., Curtis, J. H., Yao, Y., Liu, Y., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Role of
liquid-liquid phase separation-induced surface tension changes in cloud
droplet activation, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 60, 963–981,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2026.2631789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2026.2631789</a>, 2026a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Xu et al.(2026b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, X., Curtis, J. H., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Data for “Compensating biases in CCN predictions from composition averaging and neglected surfactant effects”, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-7834698_V1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-7834698_V1</a>, 2026b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Yao et al.(2022)Yao, Curtis, Ching, Zheng, and
Riemer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yao, Y., Curtis, J. H., Ching, J., Zheng, Z., and Riemer, N.: Quantifying the effects of mixing state on aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9265–9282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9265-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9265-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Yu et al.(2020)Yu, Liu, Broda, Joshi, Olfert, Sun, Fu, Coe, and
Allan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, C., Liu, D., Broda, K., Joshi, R., Olfert, J., Sun, Y., Fu, P., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Characterising mass-resolved mixing state of black carbon in Beijing using a morphology-independent measurement method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3645–3661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3645-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3645-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Zaveri et al.(2010)Zaveri, Barnard, Easter, Riemer, and
West</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Easter, R. C., Riemer, N., and West, M.:
Particle-resolved simulation of aerosol size, composition, mixing state, and
the associated optical and cloud condensation nuclei activation properties in
an evolving urban plume, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D17210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013616</a>,
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
