<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-10221-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>–VOCs sensitivity in major Chinese regions: detailed insights from GEMS satellite hourly observations</article-title><alt-title>O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>–VOCs sensitivity in major Chinese regions</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Cheng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Junjie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Yinbao</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-360X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Min</surname><given-names>Min</given-names></name>
          <email>minm5@mail.sysu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-5069</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>Qi</given-names></name>
          <email>eesfq@mail.sysu.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Jhoon</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1508-9218</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Guangzhou Meteorological Satellite Ground Station, Guangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Zhuhai, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Min Min (minm5@mail.sysu.edu.cn) and Qi Fan (eesfq@mail.sysu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>10221</fpage><lpage>10240</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Cheng Huang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e196">Ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) pollution remains a critical issue facing China. Between 2020 and 2024, the proportion of cities exceeding national standards stood at 22.5 % and 24 % respectively, representing an annual increase of 4.8 %. O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>–VOCs sensitivity analysis is central to ozone pollution control. Satellite observations from the OMI and TROPOMI provide daily HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> data but cannot capture hourly ozone variability. In this study, we use hourly observations from the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS), in combination with locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS), to investigate the diurnal evolution of ozone formation sensitivity over China during the warm season (April–September) from 2021 to 2023. The results show a strong correlation between the HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratio and ozone concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78), highlighting the complex nonlinear interactions within the O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>–VOCs chemical system. At the urban agglomeration scale, ozone formation shifts to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited or transitional regimes in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and Sichuan–Chongqing (SC) regions in the afternoon, while it shifts to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited in Pearl River Delta (PRD). Further inter-city comparisons reveal distinct controlling mechanisms. Beijing remains VOC-limited in the morning due to high NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions combined with strong solar radiation. Nanjing exhibits a persistently complex transitional regime. Chengdu maintains a predominantly VOC-limited regime throughout the day. In contrast, Guangzhou, characterized by active VOC emissions, shows a greater tendency to shift toward a NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regime. This study provides the first regional-scale characterization of diurnal ozone formation sensitivity, supporting time-resolved and region-specific emission control strategies.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42075181</award-id>
<award-id>42375182</award-id>
<award-id>42175086</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e336">Ozone (O<sub>3</sub>), as an important secondary pollutant in the troposphere, influences the climate system through radiative forcing (Akimoto, 2003) and exerts profound impacts on regional air quality, public health, and ecosystems by regulating atmospheric oxidation capacity (Feng et al., 2022). Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of ozone formation mechanisms is essential for interpreting regional air quality evolution. In recent years, ozone pollution in China has shown a persistent increasing trend (Chen et al., 2025; Li and Li, 2024), continuously promoting advances in the understanding of ozone formation mechanisms. Recent studies further suggest that oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs), such as formaldehyde (HCHO) and glyoxal, are not only important products of VOC photochemical oxidation, but also play critical roles in sustaining hydroperoxy (HO<sub>2</sub>) and organic peroxy (RO<sub>2</sub>) radical cycling and continuously enhancing ozone production. For example, HCHO photolysis may contribute approximately 70.1 % of the HO<sub>2</sub> source (Yao et al., 2025), while daytime peak concentrations of HO<sub>2</sub> and RO<sub>2</sub> typically reach 108–109 molec cm<sup>−3</sup> and are strongly correlated with odd oxygen (Ox) production rates (Bottorff et al., 2023). In addition, carbonyl compounds can contribute up to 48.3 % of the ozone formation potential (OFP), substantially exceeding the contributions from aromatics (20.2 %) and alkenes (17.0 %) (Yao et al., 2025). In addition, aerosol–photochemistry interactions are increasingly recognized as an important “third dimension” influencing ozone formation mechanisms. As PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations continue to decline, the enhanced solar radiation resulting from weakened aerosol extinction, together with changes in HO<sub>2</sub> heterogeneous uptake and nitrous acid (HONO) formation processes, may further enhance regional atmospheric oxidation capacity and reshape ozone formation sensitivity regimes (Dyson et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2025; Li et al., 2026). Against this background, some regions in eastern China may be gradually transitioning from traditional “emission-driven” ozone pollution toward a new stage dominated by a “persistent oxidation atmosphere”, characterized by sustained radical recycling, an extended ozone production window, and enhanced nighttime oxidation capacity. Meanwhile, recent studies have further proposed an “urban–forest–urban (UFU plume)” cascading ozone enhancement mechanism, suggesting that anthropogenic pollutants transported from urban areas into forested regions can further enhance downwind ozone production (35 %–105 %), while ozone production may further increase by approximately 10 % for every 1 °C increase in temperature (Li et al., 2025). This mechanism further extends earlier findings from Europe and North America that coupling between biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) and anthropogenic pollutants can enhance regional ozone formation (Trainer et al., 1987). In contrast, the fundamental photochemical processes governing the diurnal variations of ozone precursors remain relatively well established, with HCHO concentrations generally increasing with enhanced temperature and solar radiation due to VOC photochemical oxidation (Wu et al., 2023), whereas nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations decrease as a result of photochemical loss and boundary layer dilution (Xie et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e433">From the perspective of mechanistic classification, ozone formation is generally categorized into NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited, VOC-limited, and transitional regimes (Sillman and He, 2002). To quantitatively characterize the response of ozone formation to its precursors, the HCHO-to-NO<sub>2</sub> column ratio (HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub>, FNR) has been widely used to diagnose ozone formation sensitivity and has played an important role in revealing regional differences and guiding pollution control strategies (Sillman, 1999; Martin et al., 2004; Duncan et al., 2010). At present, FNR values are mainly derived from three types of data sources: instantaneous overpass observations from polar-orbiting satellites, chemical transport model simulations, or ground-based monitoring measurements. Numerous studies have employed FNR values calculated from these datasets to investigate their correspondence with ozone formation sensitivity, where higher FNR values generally indicate a NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regime, whereas lower FNR values suggest a VOC-limited regime (Souri et al., 2020; Acdan et al., 2023). For example, in East Asia, Itahashi et al. (2022) reported an overall increasing trend in FNR values over Japan and South Korea based on Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) satellite observations. In South Asia, Mahajan et al. (2015) compared observations from four different satellite instruments and found relatively high FNR values over India, implying that ozone formation is more likely to be NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited, while urban and industrialized regions exhibit distinct sensitivity characteristics. Jin et al. (2017) combined satellite observations with chemical transport modeling to reveal pronounced regional-scale differences in ozone formation sensitivity across major urban agglomerations in North America. For typical urban agglomerations in China, Xu et al. (2025), based on OMI satellite observations, found that ozone formation in the Sichuan–Chongqing (SC) region during summer was predominantly characterized by a transitional regime, accounting for approximately 42.42 % of the total area. Pan (2023) further demonstrated that the northern Yangtze River Delta (YRD) has long been dominated by the transitional regime, with an areal fraction remaining stable at around 50.0 %, substantially higher than those of the VOC-limited and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes. Similarly, Liang et al. (2024), combined with grey relational analysis, reported that in 2020 the Pearl River Delta (PRD) exhibited areal fractions of 1.6 %, 42.4 %, and 56.0 % for the VOC-limited, transitional, and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes, respectively. Overall, these studies indicate that urban areas are more commonly characterized by VOC-limited or transitional regimes, whereas rural and background regions tend to be NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited, and that major urban agglomerations worldwide exhibit broadly similar spatial differentiation patterns in ozone formation sensitivity.</p>
      <p id="d2e516">In addition to spatial heterogeneity, ozone formation sensitivity also exhibits pronounced temporal variability. Changes in meteorological conditions, surface characteristics, and anthropogenic emissions jointly drive transitions in ozone sensitivity across different time scales (Camalier et al., 2007; Fiore et al., 2002). On the interannual scale, the implementation of emission control policies has led to transitions in ozone sensitivity from VOC-limited regimes toward transitional or NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes in many regions of China (Jacob, 2000; Monks et al., 2015). Meanwhile, NO<sub>2</sub> emissions in North America, Europe, and megacities in the Global South (e.g., Jakarta and São Paulo) have also shown significant declining trends, which may further expand the spatial extent of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes (Jairo et al., 2024). At seasonal and monthly scales, ozone sensitivity also shows systematic variations; for example, under high-temperature and strong-radiation conditions in summer, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited or transitional regimes are more prevalent, whereas VOC-limited regimes tend to dominate in spring, autumn, and winter (Tang et al., 2012; Martin et al., 2004). Furthermore, studies based on observations and chemical transport modeling indicate that ozone sensitivity exhibits more complex behavior at the monthly scale, characterized by pronounced interconversions among different regimes. For example, a study focusing on ozone in Mexico reported that NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes still dominated in March, whereas northwestern Mexico transitioned into a transitional regime in April and evolved into a fully NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regime across the entire region by July (Ju et al., 2025). Similarly, Wu et al. (2018), through analyses of ozone formation mechanisms in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region, found that areas dominated by NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes from June to August gradually shifted toward transitional regimes in September, with some transitional regions further evolving into VOC-limited regimes. Likewise, Li (2021), based on numerical simulations and FNR threshold analyses, reported that most areas of the PRD were characterized by NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes in July, whereas by October, western Shenzhen, Nansha District of Guangzhou, and southeastern Foshan had transitioned into VOC-limited regimes, with some areas further evolving into transitional regimes. These studies provide important support for a deeper understanding of ozone formation mechanisms. However, a key question that remains insufficiently addressed is whether ozone formation sensitivity also undergoes systematic and regular transitions on the diurnal timescale, given the pronounced diurnal variability of ozone.</p>
      <p id="d2e592">A key challenge is that the three prevailing approaches mentioned above for calculating FNR all have inherent limitations in investigating diurnal variability. (1) Polar-orbiting satellite products (such as OMI and Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI)) provide only a single overpass “instantaneous snapshot” per day, which is insufficient to capture the continuous diurnal evolution of ozone formation sensitivity (Lyu et al., 2024; Peng et al., 2024). In addition, these observations are highly susceptible to cloud contamination, leading to data gaps and spatial discontinuities that can introduce biases in satellite-derived products (Li and Chen, 2021). (2) Numerical models can deliver hourly data products, but their results depend strongly on the accuracy of meteorological inputs, emission inventories, and chemical mechanisms. Even the most recent chemical mechanisms (such as Mechanism for Atmospheric Chemistry eXtended 1 (MAX1)) are still being continuously refined to improve simulation performance (Menut et al., 2021; Trainer et al., 1987). Moreover, uncertainties associated with meteorological forcing, emission magnitudes and temporal allocation, chemical reactions among pollutants and deposition processes can further propagate substantial uncertainties in model results (Georgiana et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2020). (3) Ground-based observations offer high temporal resolution but suffer from sparse and uneven station coverage, resulting in limited spatial representativeness and an inability to depict complete regional-scale diurnal patterns (Xu et al., 2024; Klára et al., 2019). For individual sites, ozone research relies primarily on longitudinal time-series analyses, in which comparisons with satellite observations are used to validate data accuracy or to identify temporal patterns for assessing long-term trends in local ozone levels. Indeed, Wang et al. (2019), when analyzing the spatiotemporal variability of surface ozone column concentrations in China using data from six stations, also highlighted these limitations and emphasized the need for broader spatial coverage to robustly evaluate ozone. Consequently, none of these three mainstream approaches can simultaneously provide high temporal resolution and extensive spatial coverage to directly and reliably characterize the true diurnal evolution and spatial patterns of O<sub>3</sub> formation sensitivity.</p>
      <p id="d2e605">This study leverages observations from the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) to fill the knowledge gap regarding the diurnal dynamics of ozone formation sensitivity. Unlike the “instantaneous snapshots” provided by polar-orbiting satellites, GEMS enables continuous “staring” observations over Asia, thereby allowing, for the first time, the investigation of the FNR at an hourly resolution on a regional scale. Given that the hourly GEMS products have been in stable operational use and fully validated since 2021, this study focuses on the period 2021–2023 to ensure data quality and multi-year comparability (Lange et al., 2024; Bae et al., 2025). Following common practice in domestic ozone research, the warm season is defined as April–September, during which high temperatures and strong solar radiation drive active photochemistry and represent the period of most severe ozone pollution in China (Guicai et al., 2022). Based on this, we systematically investigate the hourly spatiotemporal evolution of FNR over China during the warm seasons of 2021–2023 (09:00–16:00 local standard time (LST)), thereby elucidating the intraday transitions in ozone formation regimes and their key driving factors. It should be noted that the primary objective of this study is not merely to validate existing understanding, but rather to extend it by leveraging the hourly temporal resolution and broad spatial coverage of GEMS observations to reveal the diurnal dynamics of ozone formation sensitivity – an aspect that previous satellite-based studies, largely constrained by once-daily overpasses, have been unable to resolve. Meanwhile, the formation of high ozone concentrations in the afternoon is typically the result of the cumulative effects of multiple processes, including emissions, photochemical reactions, and boundary layer development. This study does not explicitly separate or quantitatively decompose these cumulative processes; instead, it provides observational constraints from the perspective of instantaneous formation sensitivity.</p>
      <p id="d2e608">Specifically, this study addresses two key questions: (1) What spatiotemporal patterns characterize the diurnal evolution of ozone formation sensitivity (FNR) across different regions of China during daytime (09:00–16:00 LST)? (2) Do these diurnal transition patterns differ among major urban agglomerations in China, and what are the dominant factors driving these differences? The findings of this work enable the identification of ozone-sensitive periods and key regions with unprecedented spatiotemporal detail, providing direct scientific support for the implementation of dynamic, time-resolved, region-specific, and category-based emission reduction strategies. More importantly, they contribute to a fundamental understanding of the diurnal dynamics of nonlinear photochemical processes governing ozone formation, facilitating a paradigm shift in regional air quality management from “static control” toward “dynamic regulation”. This study provides crucial insights into the temporal dynamics of O<sub>3</sub> pollution, offering a scientific basis for its coordinated management in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Dataset</title>
      <p id="d2e635">To enhance air quality monitoring and climate change forecasting in East and Southeast Asia, the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) of South Korea developed the new-generation and first GEMS aboard the Geostationary (GEO) Korea Multi-Purpose Satellite 2B (GEO-KOMPSAT-2B). This satellite was successfully launched in February 2020. GEMS operates at a spectral resolution of 0.6 nm, covering a wavelength interval of 0.2 nm across the 300–500 nm range (Kim et al., 2020). It provides hourly observations across Asia, from 5° S to 45° N and 75 to 145° E, with a spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. Compared with other satellites, GEMS offers significant advantages, with its superior temporal resolution allowing for eight daily observations from 00:45 to 07:45 UTC (Kim et al., 2020). The instrument primarily tracks key atmospheric constituents, including NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, HCHO, and aerosols. The GEMS L2 HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> products are retrieved using the Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) method. First, the slant column densities (SCDs) of the target gases are obtained through DOAS fitting of the ultraviolet–visible spectra. The SCDs are then converted to tropospheric vertical column densities (VCDs) by applying air mass factors (AMFs) derived from a radiative transfer model. The main sources of uncertainty include spectral fitting errors, AMF calculation errors, and assumptions in the a priori profiles. Detailed retrieval principles and product validation can be found in Kim et al. (2020) and Lange et al. (2024). As shown in Fig. 1, GEMS covers most of China from 08:45   to 15:45 LST, with a 1 h interval, enabling hourly analyses. Fig. 1a and 1b correspond to the first and last daily overpasses, respectively, illustrating the observational time boundaries and spatial coverage underlying the diurnal analysis in this study. LST was used for all study times in this paper if not otherwise stated. The study area for GEMS eight observation periods is defined as 17–43° N, 97–127° E, with a spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, the observation window has been adjusted to 09:00 to 16:00, crucial for monitoring photochemical activities and urban emissions in major Chinese cities (BTH, YRD, PRD, SC, in Fig. 1c. GEMS level-2 tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO data from 2021 to 2023 are free to download at <uri>https://nesc.nier.go.kr/en/html/cntnts/91/static/page.do</uri> (last access: 6 July 2026).</p>
      <p id="d2e706">In addition, this study utilizes tropospheric HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> column data from the Sentinel-5Precursor TROPOMI for 2021–2023. The products, provided by the European Space Agency (ESA), were obtained in Level-3 format via the Google Earth Engine platform and subjected to quality control filtering (qa _value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75) to remove cloud contamination and low-quality observations. Both TROPOMI and GEMS retrieve gas column densities using the DOAS method; however, they differ substantially in orbital configuration and temporal resolution. TROPOMI is a polar-orbiting satellite with approximately one overpass per day, whereas GEMS is a geostationary satellite capable of providing hourly observations. TROPOMI data have been shown to exhibit a high correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9) with GEMS NO<sub>2</sub> measurements, confirming their reliability and accuracy in capturing atmospheric composition (Oak et al., 2024). In this study, TROPOMI data are primarily used to assist in validation and spatial distribution comparisons, while analyses of ozone formation sensitivity and its diurnal variations are conducted mainly using GEMS data.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e746"><bold>(a)</bold> NO<sub>2</sub> in the Full Central (FC) region as inverted by GEMS satellite at 08:45 LST on 1 April  2021. <bold>(b)</bold> NO<sub>2</sub> in the Full West (FW) region as inverted by GEMS satellite at 15:45 LST on 1 April 2021, and <bold>(c)</bold> the study area of this study (the red combined region in panel <bold>a</bold>), where regions 1–4 denote the BTH, YRD, PRD, and SC regions, respectively. The white circular symbols from north to south indicate Beijing, Nanjing, Chengdu, and Guangzhou. <bold>(d)</bold> Spatial distribution of population density in China, 2017, the population data for the study area (<bold>a</bold> red ensemble area) represents approximately 87 % of the country's total population.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e792">The China National Air Quality Monitoring Network provides hourly surface O<sub>3</sub> measurements through an extensive network of over 1400 ground-based stations in more than 330 cities across China. This invaluable data can be accessible through the official website at <uri>https://air.cnemc.cn:18007/</uri> (last access: 6 July 2026). Our analysis includes data from 642 stations located in 210 cities, with all O<sub>3</sub> concentrations recorded in micrograms per cubic meter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). Many studies have used satellite-derived tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO concentrations in combination with near-surface ozone measurements to investigate O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>–VOCs sensitivity. Accordingly, this study employs the aforementioned GEMS data and applies a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dimensional tree (KDTree) nearest-neighbor approach to match ground stations to their nearest grid points, thereby extracting the corresponding hourly satellite observations. Additionally, this study incorporates hourly ERA5 reanalysis data, provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The ERA5 dataset includes critical meteorological variables such as 2 m temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative humidity (RH), surface solar radiation (SSR), and boundary layer height (BLH). These variables provide comprehensive insights into the meteorological conditions affecting ozone formation and its diurnal variations across the study area, enhancing the understanding of O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-VOCs interactions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Methodology</title>
      <p id="d2e913">This study employs locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) to characterize the nonlinear relationship between O<sub>3</sub> and FNR. LOESS is a nonparametric regression method that fits low-order polynomials to localized subsets of data, requiring no predetermined global functional form. Specifically, the LOESS fitting at each hour from 09:00 to 16:00 LST was performed independently. Only the O<sub>3</sub> concentrations and corresponding FNR samples at the same hour were used for each fitting, without incorporating information from preceding or subsequent hours, thereby obtaining the functional relationship O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FNR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e954">To identify high-response regions for ozone formation, the peak of the LOESS curve (denoted as f_max) was first determined. The FNR interval satisfying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FNR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> f_max was then defined as the transitional (high-response) regime. Based on the endpoints of this interval (FNR_start and FNR_end), ozone formation sensitivity was classified into three regimes: VOC-limited: FNR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> FNR_start, Transitional: FNR_start <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> FNR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> FNR_end, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited: FNR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> FNR_end.</p>
      <p id="d2e1015">To evaluate the robustness of the fitting results, a bootstrap resampling method (1000 iterations) was applied to the LOESS curves to quantify uncertainties and estimate the corresponding 95 % confidence intervals. Compared with high-order polynomial fitting, however, LOESS provides a more robust representation by reducing the influence of local fluctuations and satellite observational noise on the overall fitting results, making it more suitable for identifying the overall variation trends and high-response regions of ozone formation sensitivity at the regional scale. In addition, the ozone sensitivity classification in this study was based on high-response intervals rather than a single peak point; therefore, small variations in local peak positions are unlikely to substantially affect the classification results.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Spatial distribution of HCHO, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub></title>
      <p id="d2e1052">Figure 2, based on GEMS satellite data and ground monitoring observations, shows the daily variations in atmospheric pollutants across China during the warm seasons (April–September) from 2021 to 2023, including the tropospheric column concentrations of HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub>, as well as ground-level O<sub>3</sub> concentrations. At 09:00, higher initial concentrations of HCHO relative to NO<sub>2</sub> are apparent, likely from reduced nighttime dispersion and increased morning emissions (Wang et al., 2017). The majority of HCHO is produced through photo-oxidation of VOCs, while relatively little is emitted directly (Sun et al., 2021). As the day progresses, increases in temperature and radiation intensity promote the conversion of VOCs to HCHO (Eq. 1), significantly increasing HCHO levels, especially in densely populated urban areas (Fig. 1) with larger concentrations of VOCs such as BTH, YRD, PRD, and SC. Supplement Figs. S1–S4 indicate that the BTH, YRD, PRD and SC regions generally exhibit higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SSR and BLH, except where regional climate and topography exert influence, providing favorable conditions for photochemical reactions. Statistical analysis (Table S1 in the Supplement) shows that HCHO is significantly positively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.531, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and SSR (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.415, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating that HCHO concentrations are influenced by photochemical processes. Previous studies have also shown that HCHO concentrations increase with enhanced photochemical activity, peaking in the afternoon when solar radiation is strongest (Wu et al., 2023). Although the reaction of HCHO with OH radicals serves as a consumption mechanism (Eq. 2), in regions with high VOC emissions, the continuous conversion of both biogenic and anthropogenic VOCs, driven by increasing temperature and radiation, may result in a net production rate of HCHO that surpasses its consumption rate, thereby leading to a sustained increase in HCHO concentrations during the afternoon period (Javed et al., 2019). Overall, HCHO concentrations increase steadily throughout the day, reaching a maximum at 16:00, approximately 1.3 times the 09:00 level. Meanwhile, NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations display pronounced diurnal fluctuations. Due to traffic and industrial emissions, concentrations are higher in the morning, while photochemical loss is minimal under low solar radiation (Fig. 3) (Xie et al., 2016). As solar radiation and temperature increase, enhanced photochemical activity promotes NO<sub>2</sub> depletion (Eqs. 3–4), leading to a gradual decrease in concentrations over the course of the day. The most rapid NO<sub>2</sub> reduction occurs between 13:00 and 14:00, primarily due to fast photochemical conversion coupled with strong mixing associated with the maximum boundary layer height (Fig. 3). Statistical analysis (Table S1) further indicates that NO<sub>2</sub> is significantly negatively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.556, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and BLH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.201</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), reflecting the combined effects of enhanced photochemical loss and dilution by boundary layer mixing. However, after 16:00, as photochemical activity diminishes and traffic increases in some cities due to school dismissals and varying work shifts, NO<sub>2</sub> levels rise again (Zhang and Batterman, 2009). This trend is consistent with observations by Kim et al. (2020) and  Elise and Tracey (2020). NO<sub>2</sub> peaks in the morning and then gradually decline, reaching around 70 % of their initial level by 15:00, followed by a slight rebound in the late afternoon. Although NO<sub>2</sub> is also regenerated during this process (Eqs. 5–7), increased photolytic activity and the conversion of NO<sub>2</sub> to nitric acid (Eq. 8) typically decrease NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations throughout the daytime (Tan et al., 2019). The peak of O<sub>3</sub> occurs between 15:00 and 16:00, with concentrations gradually increasing throughout the day, starting from a morning average of 56.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> and reaching a peak of 122.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> around 15:00. Liu and Wang (2020) and Xia et al. (2021) also reported that high O<sub>3</sub> concentrations during the warm season peak around 15:00 in major city clusters in China. In addition, tropospheric ozone columns retrieved from the geostationary satellite GEMS exhibit a consistent diurnal pattern, with ozone gradually increasing throughout the morning and peaking in the afternoon (around 15:00) (Kim, 2023), showing good agreement in diurnal phase with surface observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e1364">Overall, the spatial distribution of HCHO, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations reveals significant regional differences across China. In the morning, high concentrations of HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> are primarily concentrated in urban clusters, reflecting the impact of industrial activities and traffic emissions on the precursors of O<sub>3</sub>. Meanwhile, O<sub>3</sub> concentrations are predominantly concentrated in the northern regions. In the afternoon, both HCHO and ozone concentrations increase significantly, with their distribution range notably expanding compared to the morning, particularly in high-population-density urban areas. However, high concentrations of NO<sub>2</sub> remain primarily concentrated in northern China, but due to the influence of local meteorological conditions, industrial emissions, and the involvement in O<sub>3</sub> formation, NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations gradually decrease.

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M119" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>other by-products (e.g., HCHO)</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UV</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UV</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1723">Here, VOCs react with hydroxyl radicals (OH), producing RO<sub>2</sub> and by-products like HCHO. RO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO can further react with nitrogen monoxide (NO), forming NO<sub>2</sub>. NO<sub>2</sub> undergoes photolysis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), breaking down into NO and atomic oxygen (O), which combines with molecular oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) to form O<sub>3</sub>. O<sub>3</sub> can react with NO to regenerate NO<sub>2</sub>, maintaining the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> cycle. Meanwhile, HCHO can photolyze into carbon monoxide (CO) and more hydroperoxyl radicals, accelerating O<sub>3</sub> formation. NO<sub>2</sub> can also react with OH and a third body (M) to form nitric acid (HNO<sub>3</sub>), reducing NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> levels and limiting further O<sub>3</sub> production.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1867">Hourly atmospheric monitoring in China during the warm season (April to September 2021–2023). <bold>(a–h)</bold> and <bold>(i–p)</bold> Spatial distribution of hourly mean HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> levels retrieved from GEMS satellite data. <bold>(q–x)</bold> Temporal variations in ground-level mean O<sub>3</sub> concentrations, observed at various monitoring stations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1905"><bold>(a)</bold> Warm-season hourly ozone averages and deviations for all stations in the study area, with corresponding HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> from GEMS. <bold>(b)</bold> and ERA5 corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH, SSR, and BLH at the closest point site.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>–VOCs chemistry captured by GEMS satellite-based HCHO/NO<sub>2</sub></title>
      <p id="d2e1978">Figure 4 displays the daily relationship between HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and ground-level O<sub>3</sub> utilizing LOESS fitting method to highlight trends and high O<sub>3</sub> concentration events. The distributions of HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> at 09:00 are dispersed. The concentration of O<sub>3</sub> is relatively low in Fig. 4a, so the photochemical reaction required for O<sub>3</sub> formation has not yet started completely because of the low temperature and radiation (Fig. 3). At this time, data points (NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>15</sup> molec cm<sup>−2</sup>) are concentrated in the upper left corner, suggesting a NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-saturated state with VOCs (represented by HCHO) as the limiting factor. In addition, a small amount of O<sub>3</sub> reacts with NO to form new NO<sub>2</sub> at this time (Eq. 5), but its contribution is smaller than the impact of direct emissions and the effect of nighttime accumulation (Romer et al., 2018). From 10:00 to 12:00, as sunlight and temperature rise, data points move towards the lower right, significantly increasing O<sub>3</sub> concentration. During this period, three typical states of O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-VOCs chemical processes can be identified: the VOC-limited regime, the transition zone, and the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regime. By the afternoon (Fig. 4e–h), the data points consistently cluster in regimes characterized by elevated HCHO and depleted NO<sub>2</sub>, indicating a progressive shift in the photochemical environment. Under these conditions, O<sub>3</sub> concentrations concurrently reach their diurnal maximum. The photochemical reaction of VOCs is accelerated with increasing solar radiation (peak at 13:00) and temperature, generating more free radicals and intermediates (e.g., HCHO). The increase of these free radicals will further promote the photolysis of NO<sub>2</sub> and accelerate the generation of O<sub>3</sub>. At the same time, the photolysis of NO<sub>2</sub> not only produces O<sub>3</sub> directly but also reduces the concentration of NO<sub>2</sub>, reducing the O<sub>3</sub> consumption reaction (Yang et al., 2021). In addition, the lower relative humidity reduces the involvement of water vapor, which usually consumes O<sub>3</sub>, and this reduction favors the accumulation of O<sub>3</sub> (Zhang et al., 2022). Since the reaction of VOCs and NO<sub>2</sub> photolysis are mutually reinforcing, O<sub>3</sub> production in this environment shows a nonlinear enhancement, which is particularly evident under conditions of abundant VOCs but low NO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2264">Although there are some differences in the concentration and spatial distribution of HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> between the GEMS and TROPOMI satellite data (Fig. 5), they all exhibit similar distribution characteristics of high values in the four major urban agglomerations (BTH, YRD, SC, and PRD). Specifically, the areas of high concentrations of HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> are the same in both data, while the HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratio also exhibits a similar spatial pattern. This similarity is further supported by the difference values (Fig. 5i), which show relatively small discrepancies in FNR over major urban agglomerations. In addition, the quantitative comparison in Fig. S5 indicates positive correlations between GEMS and TROPOMI observations for both HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub>, with correlation coefficients of 0.506 and 0.838, respectively. The mean biases (MB) are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.185</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<sup>−2</sup> for HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.509 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>15</sup> molec cm<sup>−2</sup> for NO<sub>2</sub>. Overall, NO<sub>2</sub> exhibits higher consistency between the two datasets, whereas HCHO shows relatively weaker agreement. This discrepancy likely reflects known uncertainties in HCHO retrievals, such as a lower signal-to-noise ratio and a stronger dependence on a priori profiles, and is also influenced by differences in satellite overpass times (GEMS: hourly daytime observations; TROPOMI: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13:30 LST). As a ratio, FNR partially cancels systematic biases, yielding a correlation coefficient of 0.783 with an MB of 1.172, and thus exhibits strong agreement and similar overall trends between the two datasets. Previous studies have likewise reported good agreement between GEMS and TROPOMI for HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub>, with correlation coefficients reaching 0.80 and 0.62, respectively, and overall correlations ranging from 0.59 to 0.85, with most regional differences within 20 % (Fu et al., 2024; He, 2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e2408">Therefore, FNR derived from both datasets can effectively capture the nonlinear relationships between ozone precursors relevant to ozone formation processes. Based on this, we further investigated the diurnal characteristics of the quantitative relationship between the probability of high-ozone events and the FNR derived from GEMS satellite observations, as shown in Fig. 4i–p. Compared to cubic polynomial fitting (Fig. 6), we found that LOESS fitting performed better in identifying peak probabilities of high O<sub>3</sub> events with minimal uncertainty. During the morning hours (from 09:00 to 12:00), O<sub>3</sub> concentrations gradually increase within the transition ranges of [0.94, 1.46] to [1.36, 2.07], with fitting curves that are steep and closely aligned to the y-axis, indicating a rapid shift from a VOC-limited to a regime significantly influenced by HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub>. As solar radiation intensifies and emissions from traffic and industrial sources continue, O<sub>3</sub> gradually accumulates near the ground. Note that the maximum FNR position gradually shifts rightward, indicating the growing importance of NO<sub>2</sub> in O<sub>3</sub> formation. In the afternoon (after 12:00), the fitted regimes, with broader transition zones spanning [1.30, 2.22] to [1.36, 2.28], more accurately captured the nonlinear relationship of O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-VOCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than those in the morning. The afternoon typically meets peak radiation and temperatures (Fig. 3), accelerating chemical reactions, especially photochemical reactions, thus enhancing O<sub>3</sub> production (Coates et al., 2016). Besides, the stable emissions and atmospheric chemical processes lead to consistent O<sub>3</sub> sensitivity curves from 13:00 to 16:00. Throughout the day, the maximum high-probability O<sub>3</sub> values from GEMS LOESS fitting increase, peaking at 1.97 at 15:00, before declining at 16:00. The O<sub>3</sub> sensitivity thresholds at 13:00 in this study align with previous findings, such as [1.0, 2.0] by Jin and Holloway (2015), and [1.5, 2.3] by  Chang et al. (2016). Furthermore, GEMS data further revealed that the hourly variability in O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-VOCs sensitivity throughout the day was more complex and dynamic compared to previous studies, which primarily reported diurnal changes limited to a single time period, as observed by polar-orbiting satellites.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2557">Relationship between hourly surface O<sub>3</sub> and GEMS HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> during the warm seasons (April–September) of 2021–2023, analyzed using LOESS. <bold>(a–h)</bold> Scatterplots of hourly surface O<sub>3</sub> concentrations versus GEMS HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub>, based on ground-level hourly O<sub>3</sub> observations (09:00–16:00 LST) matched with the corresponding GEMS HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> data. The two vertical black lines indicate the boundaries of the transitional regime. <bold>(i–p)</bold> Relationship between the HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis) and the probability of high O<sub>3</sub> events (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis), based on 200 bins. Each bin represents half-monthly averaged values matched with the corresponding hourly O<sub>3</sub> concentrations. High O<sub>3</sub> thresholds are defined as follows: 09:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, 10:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, 11:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, 12:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, 13:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, 14:00 and later <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>. The red curve represents the LOESS fit, and the shaded area indicates the 95 % confidence interval derived from bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2859">Mean values of HCHO, NO<sub>2</sub>, and HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> at 13:00 p.m. LST from 2021 to 2023 retrieved from GEMS and TROPOMI satellite data and their respective differences.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2895">Similar to Fig. 4 <bold>(i–p)</bold>, but with a third-order polynomial fit.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Spatiotemporal distribution of O<sub>3</sub> production regimes</title>
      <p id="d2e2925">Figure 7 illustrates the diurnal characteristics of ozone formation regimes over the study region from April to September 2023. Spatially, the region is predominantly NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited, followed by transitional regimes, with VOC-limited and transitional areas mainly concentrated in the northern part. Further analysis indicates that VOC-limited regimes are particularly pronounced in urban centers, whereas surrounding suburban and rural areas are more often classified as transitional or NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited (see Figs. S6–S7). This spatial differentiation is consistent with the findings of Ren et al. (2022) and Li et al. (2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e2946">In terms of diurnal variation, ozone formation regimes exhibit significant dynamic transitions. As the day progresses into the afternoon (after approximately 13:00), many urban areas that are VOC-limited in the morning gradually shift toward transitional regimes. For example, in the BTH, YRD and SC regions, urban areas predominantly maintain a VOC-limited state in the morning but clearly transition toward transitional regimes in the afternoon. In contrast, the PRD shows a different pattern, being mainly transitional in the morning and further shifting to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited in the afternoon. This behavior may be associated with higher temperatures and humidity in the region, which facilitate the photochemical reactions between VOCs and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, thereby altering ozone formation sensitivity. This hypothesis is consistent with Wang et al. (2024), who reported enhanced photochemical reaction rates in the PRD. Moreover, recent air quality policies in the PRD have significantly reduced VOC and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> concentrations, which may also contribute to the observed shift from VOC-limited to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes (Li et al., 2024). Figure 8 (analogous to Fig. 7 but for 2021 and 2022) further indicate a trend in recent years in the PRD toward transitional and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes in the morning. In contrast, the SC region maintains a primarily VOC-limited regime during the day, likely due to unique geographic features that restrict regional circulation and form temperature inversions, partially suppressing pollutant dispersion (Yang et al., 2020). Notably, the intensity of the VOC-limited regime in the SC region weakens in the afternoon and is not particularly pronounced in the morning, which may be influenced by solar radiation intensity and atmospheric dynamics. The above results indicate that ozone formation regimes exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity and diurnal variation at the regional scale. However, such large-scale patterns may obscure differences in precursor evolution and meteorological drivers among individual cities. Therefore, further analysis at the city scale is necessary to elucidate the physicochemical processes governing ozone formation.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e2996">Diurnal photochemical-regime classification over study areas in O<sub>3</sub> pollution period from April to September 2023. <bold>(a–h)</bold> the analysis utilizes eight-hourly HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratio data from the GEMS satellite to classify the regional O<sub>3</sub> formation dynamics in polluted areas (regions with GEMS NO<sub>2</sub> columns exceeding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<sup>−2</sup>), The classification thresholds for VOC-limited, transitional, and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited conditions are based on the relationship between hourly surface high O<sub>3</sub> occurrence probabilities and GEMS HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub>, as shown in Fig. 4.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e3117">Similar to Fig. 7, but for 2021 <bold>(a–h)</bold> and 2022 <bold>(i–p)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Analysis of O<sub>3</sub> Formation Mechanisms in Representative Cities</title>
      <p id="d2e3150">Four representative cities – Beijing, Nanjing, Chengdu, and Guangzhou – were selected to represent the BTH, YRD, SC and PRD regions, respectively. A spatial masking was performed between the administrative boundaries of each city and the aforementioned ozone formation sensitivity regimes, thereby quantifying the fractional characteristics of the ozone formation regimes within each city. As shown in Fig. 9a–d, except for Guangzhou, the other three cities exhibit a high proportion of VOC-limited regimes during the daytime. Notably, the VOC-limited fraction in Beijing and Chengdu peaks around noon (12:00). The changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub>, along with their rate-of-change ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), serve as a robust indicator for tracking the dynamic response of relative precursor conversion intensities. With this analytical framework, we further combine the hourly meteorological conditions (Fig. 9e–h), the rates of change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub> (Fig. 9i–l), and the correlations between pollutants and meteorological factors in each city (Tables S2–S5) to conduct a comparative analysis of ozone formation mechanisms and their diurnal evolution.</p>
      <p id="d2e3236">Beijing is characterized by the coexistence of VOC-limited and transitional regimes between 09:00 and 16:00, reflecting a NO<sub>2</sub>-abundant environment. More specifically, Beijing remains predominantly VOC-limited from 09:00 to 13:00, after which the fractions of the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited and transitional regimes gradually increase. Notably, taking 12:00 as a turning point, the VOC-limited fraction increases hourly before noon while the other regimes decrease, whereas after 12:00 the VOC-limited fraction declines sharply and reaches a minimum at 16:00, accompanied by a concurrent increase in the other two regimes, which peak at the same time. Strong SSR, particularly between 12:00 and 13:00, together with a rapidly increasing BLH, substantially enhances NO<sub>2</sub> photolysis and weakens the titration of O<sub>3</sub> by NO. As shown in Table S2, the negative correlation coefficients of NO<sub>2</sub> with SSR and BLH are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.384 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.219, respectively. Even so, under high-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emission conditions, ozone formation is still unlikely to enter a NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regime and is instead more strongly constrained by VOCs availability. Previous studies have shown that under NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-rich conditions, ozone production is more sensitive to VOCs, and that boundary layer development and enhanced radiation further amplify this sensitivity (Ren et al., 2022). Consistently, Fig. 9i shows a relatively large net loss rate of NO<sub>2</sub>, whereas the increase in HCHO is comparatively limited, leading to low values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub> in the morning and further indicating VOC-limited ozone formation under a NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-abundant background. In the afternoon, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub> begins to increase, suggesting a transition toward a transitional regime with emerging NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited characteristics.</p>
      <p id="d2e3416">O<sub>3</sub> formation in Nanjing exhibits a more complex diurnal evolution, characterized by a predominantly transitional regime jointly controlled by VOCs and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, alongside a non-negligible contribution from the VOC-limited regime. During 09:00–11:00, the fractions of the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited and transitional regimes decrease, whereas the VOC-limited fraction increases. Taking 13:00 as a turning point, the former two regimes show an increase followed by a decrease, while the VOC-limited regime displays the opposite pattern. Compared with Beijing, the growth rate of the BLH in Nanjing is substantially weaker, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH are considerably higher. Such meteorological conditions may affect the efficiency of HO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<sub>2</sub> chain reactions, rendering ozone production more nonlinearly responsive to precursor changes and thereby leading to more complex dynamic behavior (Lu et al., 2019b). The statistical results (Table S3) further show that O<sub>3</sub> is significantly positively correlated with both SSR and BLH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.507 and 0.387, respectively), whereas the correlation between NO<sub>2</sub> and BLH is relatively weak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.017), indicating that ozone formation in Nanjing is jointly regulated by photochemical activity and complex boundary layer evolution. Consistent with this interpretation, the rates of change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub> (Fig. 9j) increase synchronously after 12:00, resulting in a transient rise in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub>; however, this elevated ratio is not sustained. This indicates that Nanjing does not stably enter a single-precursor-limited regime but instead remains largely within a transitional state characterized by joint VOC-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> control, reflecting strong photochemical activity under a NO<sub>2</sub> -rich background.</p>
      <p id="d2e3606">In contrast, Chengdu is dominated by a VOC-limited regime, followed by the transitional regime, while the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regime accounts for the smallest fraction. Before 12:00, the fractions of the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited and transitional regimes decrease hourly, accompanied by a continuous increase in the VOC-limited fraction. After 12:00, although the VOC-limited fraction decreases slightly, it remains substantially higher than the other two regimes. Ozone formation in Chengdu is strongly influenced by basin-induced meteorological conditions: the enclosed topography restricts atmospheric dispersion and suppresses photochemical intensity, while sustained traffic and industrial emissions maintain relatively high NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> levels, making ozone production more strongly constrained by VOC availability (Lu et al., 2019a). As shown in Table S4, the negative correlation between HCHO and RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.185) is substantially stronger than that between NO<sub>2</sub> and RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.014), indicating that under basin conditions, high humidity exerts a more pronounced suppressive effect on HCHO accumulation, thereby further enhancing the sensitivity of ozone formation to VOCs. The rate-of-change characteristics of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub> further support this interpretation. Compared with the other three cities, Chengdu exhibits the smallest variability in both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub>. During the morning (09:00–11:00), NO<sub>2</sub> continues to increase, whereas HCHO does not show a corresponding enhancement, limiting the amplification of radical chain reactions and thereby suppressing rapid ozone formation. Even in the afternoon, when NO<sub>2</sub> experiences sustained net loss and HCHO increases concurrently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub> remains persistently low, indicating that ozone formation in Chengdu is consistently dominated by a VOC-limited regime.</p>
      <p id="d2e3766">In Guangzhou, ozone formation is dominated by the transitional regime before 12:00, followed by the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited and VOC-limited regimes. After 12:00, the VOC-limited regime disappears, and ozone formation gradually shifts toward a pattern dominated by the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regime, with the transitional regime as secondary. Among the four cities, Guangzhou exhibits the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH, which may enhance photochemical reaction rates and contribute to the observed shift toward NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes in the afternoon. The statistical results further show (Table S5) that O<sub>3</sub> is significantly positively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.475) and SSR (0.578), whereas NO<sub>2</sub> exhibits a negative correlation with SSR (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.180), indicating that strong photochemical conditions promote NO<sub>2</sub> photolysis and ozone formation. In addition, the continuously increasing anthropogenic and biogenic VOC emissions and oxidation processes in southern coastal regions maintain relatively high HCHO concentrations, which further contributes to the persistently low fraction of VOC-limited regimes (Wei et al., 2023). After 12:00, the net loss rate of NO<sub>2</sub> weakens rapidly, whereas HCHO maintains stable positive production, leading to a pronounced short-term enhancement in the marginal sensitivity of ozone formation to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and a progressive transition toward a NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regime. Overall, Guangzhou is characterized by an HCHO-abundant regime driven by strong biogenic and anthropogenic VOC emissions. These features are consistent with previous understandings of ozone formation mechanisms in eastern and southern Chinese cities (Wang et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d2e3889">Therefore, effective ozone pollution control should avoid single-precursor strategies and instead implement coordinated and time-dependent reductions of VOCs and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> tailored to different regions and meteorological conditions to achieve stable and effective ozone mitigation.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e3903">Hourly-averaged diurnal variations of ozone formation regimes, meteorological conditions, and precursor concentrations for representative cities during the warm season from 2021 to 2023: Beijing <bold>(a, e, i)</bold>, Nanjing <bold>(b, f, j)</bold>, Chengdu <bold>(c, g, k)</bold>, and Guangzhou <bold>(d, h, l)</bold>. <bold>(a–d)</bold> Fractional contributions of O<sub>3</sub> formation regimes. <bold>(e–h)</bold> hourly time series of meteorological variables (BLH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RH, SSR). <bold>(i–l)</bold> hourly rates of change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<sub>2</sub>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10221/2026/acp-26-10221-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and Outlook</title>
      <p id="d2e3992">HCHO is an important intermediate in the photochemical oxidation of VOCs, while NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, as a key reactant in ozone formation, together with VOCs determines the sensitivity structure of ozone production. Here, utilizing GEMS satellite technology and ground-based monitoring stations, we analyzed the relationship between meteorological factors and the spatiotemporal distribution of O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-VOCs from 09:00 to 16:00 in major Chinese regions, based on hourly O<sub>3</sub>-NO<sub>2</sub>-HCHO data and meteorological parameters from the warm seasons of 2021–2023. In addition, the sensitivity characteristics of the HCHO-to-NO<sub>2</sub> relationship were examined to analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of O<sub>3</sub> formation and the differences in formation mechanisms across major regions of China and representative cities (Beijing, Nanjing, Chengdu, and Guangzhou). The main conclusions are summarized as follows:</p>
      <p id="d2e4059">O<sub>3</sub> and HCHO concentrations generally exhibited an upward trend from 09:00 to 16:00, peaking at 15:00 and 16:00, respectively. In contrast, NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations generally declined, with a notable rebound only at 10:00. Spatially, elevated levels of O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO were concentrated in the BTH, YRD, SC and PRD regions. Meteorologically, both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SSR exerted positive effects on ozone and HCHO concentrations. Meanwhile, enhanced photochemical activity and increased boundary layer height occasionally led to a reduction in nitrogen dioxide levels.</p>
      <p id="d2e4113">The scatter plot indicates that NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> reaches saturation at 09:00. During the afternoon period (after 12:00), the ozone formation environment exhibits a distinct non-linear trend characterized by high VOC concentrations and low NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. Moreover, compared to cubic polynomial fitting, LOESS fitting better highlights the diurnal variation characteristics of the quantitative relationship between FNR. Particularly after 12:00, the nonlinear relationship between O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-VOCs exhibits <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the O<sub>3</sub> sensitivity curve remains consistent, peaking at 15:00 with a value of 1.97, and ranging from 1.40 to 2.45.</p>
      <p id="d2e4177">From the spatio-temporal distribution of ozone formation mechanisms, China's primary regions remain predominantly NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited, with VOC-limited and transitional zones concentrated in the northern study area and parts of SC. Temporally, VOC-limited zones peak between 11:00 and 12:00, while transitional zones expand after 13:00. Additionally, the PRD region gradually transitioned from a VOC-limited pattern towards NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited and transitional modes between 2021 and 2023.</p>
      <p id="d2e4199">With respect to the dominant drivers of the diurnal variation in ozone formation sensitivity across major urban regions, Beijing, Nanjing, Chengdu, and Guangzhou are selected as representative cities for the BTH, YRD, SC and PRD regions, respectively. The results show that Beijing, under a NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-rich emission background, exhibits a VOC-limited regime driven by strong solar radiation and rapid boundary layer development, and transitions toward a transitional regime in the afternoon. Nanjing is dominated by a transitional regime jointly controlled by VOCs and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> under hot and humid meteorological conditions, with complex diurnal variability arising from the nonlinear photochemical response of ozone formation to its precursors. Chengdu is dominated by a VOC-limited regime, primarily driven by basin-induced constraints on atmospheric dispersion that lead to persistent NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> accumulation and relatively weak photochemical activity, resulting in a comparatively stable diurnal pattern. Guangzhou, under hot and humid climatic conditions, experiences persistently high HCHO levels driven by active biogenic and anthropogenic VOC emissions, which promote a transition of ozone formation toward a NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regime.</p>
      <p id="d2e4238">In summary, our GEMS-based results largely confirm the existing mechanistic understanding: HCHO increases with enhanced photochemical activity, NO<sub>2</sub> decreases due to photochemical loss, and the FNR-based spatial patterns are consistent with previous studies. An important extension was further achieved in this study by, for the first time, jointly analyzing hourly GEMS HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> observations together with ground-level O<sub>3</sub> measurements to reveal the continuous spatiotemporal dynamic characteristics of ozone formation sensitivity on the diurnal scale, specifically characterized by a gradual transition in many urban regions from VOC-limited conditions in the morning to transitional or NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-limited regimes in the afternoon. Therefore, our findings do not contradict existing theory; rather, they introduce a critical temporal dimension that cannot be resolved by previous satellite studies limited to daily-scale observations. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that several advanced mechanistic aspects are not directly addressed in this study. These include the specific roles of different VOC species (e.g., carbonyls versus aromatics) in radical production, the coupled effects of heterogeneous HO<sub>2</sub> uptake and aerosol radiative processes on radical cycling and O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>–VOCs sensitivity (Dyson et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2022; Li et al., 2018), as well as the differential contributions of anthropogenic and biogenic VOCs to ozone formation. Future research will further advance within a multi-process coupled framework by integrating regional air quality models, high-resolution anthropogenic VOC emission inventories, and aerosol–radiation interactions, while explicitly incorporating key mechanisms such as heterogeneous HO<sub>2</sub> loss, to systematically elucidate the nonlinear response characteristics of O<sub>3</sub>–VOCs–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, thereby providing more robust scientific support for precise emission reduction and coordinated control strategies across different periods and regions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e4336">GEMS satellite data (level-2 tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO data) are accessible via the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) website (<uri>https://nesc.nier.go.kr/en/html/cntnts/91/static/page.do</uri>, last access: 6 July 2026). Ground-based ozone station data originate from the China National Atmospheric Environment Monitoring Network (<uri>https://air.cnemc.cn:18007/</uri>, last access: 6 July 2026). Land use type remote sensing data (30 m resolution) can be found at <uri>https://www.resdc.cn/DOI/doi.aspx?DOIid=54</uri>. 2 m temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative humidity (RH), surface solar radiation (SSR), and boundary layer height (BLH) can be downloaded from the ERA5 database (<uri>https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis.html</uri>, last access:  6 July 2026).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e4376">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10221-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10221-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e4385">FQ and MM. Methodology: FQ. Investigation: CH, JW and YJ. Visualization: YJ and MM. Supervision: QF and JK. Writing – original draft: YJ, CH and MM. Writing – review &amp; editing: MM. and JK.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e4391">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e4397">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e4403">The GEMS team is gratefully acknowledged for their valuable data and technical support in this study.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e4408">This work was supported by the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province (Science and Technology Innovation Platform Category) (grant no. 2019B121201002), the Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (grant no. 2020B0301030004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42375182, 42175086 and 42075181).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e4414">This paper was edited by Jayanarayanan Kuttippurath and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Acdan, J. J. M., Pierce, R. B., Dickens, A. F., Adelman, Z., and Nergui, T.: Examining TROPOMI formaldehyde to nitrogen dioxide ratios in the Lake Michigan region: implications for ozone exceedances, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7867–7885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7867-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-7867-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Akimoto, H.: Global Air Quality and Pollution, Science, 302, 1716–1719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092666" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092666</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bae, K., Song, C.-K., Van Roozendael, M., Richter, A., Wagner, T., Merlaud, A., Pinardi, G., Friedrich, M. M., Fayt, C., Dimitropoulou, E., Lange, K., Bösch, T., Zilker, B., Latsch, M., Behrens, L. K., Ziegler, S., Ripperger-Lukosiūnaitė, S., Kuhn, L., Lauster, B., Reischmann, L., Uhlmannsiek, K., Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Gebetsberger, M., Park, R. J., Lee, H., Hong, H., Chang, L. S., and Jeon, K.: Validation of GEMS operational v2.0 total column NO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO during the GMAP/SIJAQ campaign, Sci. Total Environ., 974, 179190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179190" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179190</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bottorff, B., Lew, M. M., Woo, Y., Rickly, P., Rollings, M. D., Deming, B., Anderson, D. C., Wood, E., Alwe, H. D., Millet, D. B., Weinheimer, A., Tyndall, G., Ortega, J., Dusanter, S., Leonardis, T., Flynn, J., Erickson, M., Alvarez, S., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Shutter, J. D., Keutsch, F., Helmig, D., Wang, W., Allen, H. M., Slade, J. H., Shepson, P. B., Bertman, S., and Stevens, P. S.: OH, HO<sub>2</sub>, and RO<sub>2</sub> radical chemistry in a rural forest environment: measurements, model comparisons, and evidence of a missing radical sink, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10287–10311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10287-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-10287-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Camalier, L., Cox, W., and Dolwick, P.: The effects of meteorology on ozone in urban areas and their use in assessing ozone trends, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7127–7137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.061</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chang, C. Y., Faust, E., Hou, X. T., Lee, P. K., Hyun, C. K., Brent, C. H., and Liao, K. J.: Investigating ambient ozone formation regimes in neighboring cities of shale plays in the Northeast United States using photochemical modeling and satellite retrievals, Atmos. Environ., 142, 152–170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.058</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, T. Z., Chu, B. W., Ma, J. Z., Ma, Q. X., Liu, Q., Wang, S. X., He, K. B., Zhao, J. C., and He, H.: Ozone Pollution in China: Current Status and Control Strategies, Engineering, 60, 15–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.06.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.eng.2025.06.044</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Coates, J., Mar, K. A., Ojha, N., and Butler, T. M.: The influence of temperature on ozone production under varying NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions – a modelling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11601–11615, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11601-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11601-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Duncan, B. N., Yoshida, Y., Olson, J. R., Sillman, S., Martin, R. V., Lamsal, L., Hu, Y., Pickering, K. E., Retscher, C., Allen, D. J., and Crawford, J. H.: Application of OMI observations to a space-based indicator of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and VOC controls on surface ozone formation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2213–2223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Dyson, J. E., Whalley, L. K., Slater, E. J., Woodward-Massey, R., Ye, C., Lee, J. D., Squires, F., Hopkins, J. R., Dunmore, R. E., Shaw, M., Hamilton, J. F., Lewis, A. C., Worrall, S. D., Bacak, A., Mehra, A., Bannan, T. J., Coe, H., Percival, C. J., Ouyang, B., Hewitt, C. N., Jones, R. L., Crilley, L. R., Kramer, L. J., Acton, W. J. F., Bloss, W. J., Saksakulkrai, S., Xu, J., Shi, Z., Harrison, R. M., Kotthaus, S., Grimmond, S., Sun, Y., Xu, W., Yue, S., Wei, L., Fu, P., Wang, X., Arnold, S. R., and Heard, D. E.: Impact of HO<sub>2</sub> aerosol uptake on radical levels and O<sub>3</sub> production during summertime in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5679–5697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Elise, P. and Tracey, H.: Evaluating current satellite capability to observe diurnal change in nitrogen oxides in preparation for geostationary satellite missions, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 034038, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6b36" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ab6b36</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Z. Z., Xu, Y. S., Kobayashi, K., Dai, L. L., Zhang, T. Y., Agathokleous, E., Calatayud, V., Paoletti, E., Mukherjee, A., Agrawal, M., Park, R. J., Oak, Y. J., and Yue, X.: Ozone pollution threatens the production of major staple crops in East Asia, Nature Food, 3, 47–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/S43016-021-00422-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/S43016-021-00422-6</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Fiore, A. M., Jacob, D. J., Bey, I., Yantosca, R. M., Field, B. D., and Fusco, A. C.: Background ozone over the United States in summer: origin, trend, and contribution to pollution episodes, J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACH 11-1–ACH 11-25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000982" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000982</ext-link>, 2002</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Fu, W., Zhu, L., Kwon, H. A., Park, R. J., Lee, G. T., De Smedt, I., Liu, S., Li, X., Chen, Y., Pu, D., Li, J., Zuo, X., Zhang, P., Li, Y., Yan, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Wu, X., Shen, H., Ye, J., Wang, C., Fu, T.-M., and Yang, X.: Evaluating GEMS HCHO retrievals with TROPOMI product, Pandora observations, and GEOS-Chem simulations, Earth Space Sci., 12, e2024EA003894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EA003894" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024EA003894</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Georgiana, G., Sabina, Ş., Constantin, R., and Cristinel, G.: Assessing of surface-ozone concentration in Bucharest, Romania, using OML and satellite data, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 7, 567–576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.02.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2016.02.001</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Guicai, N., Wardle, D. A., and Yim, S. H. L.: Suppression of ozone formation at high temperature in China: from historical observations to future projections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL097090</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>He, Q.: NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emission inversion and near-surface NO<sub>2</sub> estimation based on TROPOMI and GEMS, Ph.D. thesis, School of Environment and Surveying, China University of Mining and Technology, China, 136 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.27623/d.cnki.gzkyu.2025.000172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.27623/d.cnki.gzkyu.2025.000172</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Itahashi, S., Irie, H., Shimadera, H., and Chatani, S.: Fifteen-Year Trends (2005–2019) in the Satellite-Derived Ozone-Sensitive Regime in East Asia: A Gradual Shift from VOC-Sensitive to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-Sensitive, Remote Sensing, 14, 4512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs14184512</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Jacob, D. J.: Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2131–2159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00462-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00462-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Jairo, V. S., Hata, H., Martinez-Noriega, E. J., and Inoue, K.: Ozone trends and their sensitivity in global megacities under the warming climate, Nat. Commun., 15, 10236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54490-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-024-54490-w</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Javed, Z., Liu, C., Khokhar, M. F., Tan, W., Liu, H., Xing, C., Ji, X., Tanvir, A., Hong, Q., and Sandhu, O.: Ground-Based MAX-DOAS Observations of CHOCHO and HCHO in Beijing and Baoding, China, Remote Sens., 11, 1524, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs11131524</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Jin, X. and Holloway, T.: Spatial and temporal variability of ozone sensitivity over China observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7229–7246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023250" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023250</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Jin, X. M., Arlene, M. F., Lee, T. M., Lukas, C. V., Lok, N. L., Bryan, D. K., Folkert, B., Isabelle, D. S., Gonzalo, G. A., Kelly, C., and Gail, S. T.: Evaluating a space-based indicator of surface ozone-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-VOC sensitivity over midlatitude source regions and application to decadal trends, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 10439–10461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026720" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026720</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Ju, T., Wang, L., Li, B., Lv, Z., and Gu, Z.: Study on correlation between atmospheric pollutants and meteorological factors during extreme weather in Mexico based on GTWR model, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 18, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-025-01724-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11869-025-01724-5</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Kim, J., Jeong, U., Ahn, M. H., Kim, J. H., Park, R. J., Lee, H. L., Song, C. H., Choi, Y. S., Lee, K. H., Yoo, J. M., Jeong, M. J., Park, S. K., Lee, K. M., Song, C. K., Kim, S. W., Kim, Y. J., Kim, S. W., Kim, M. J., Go, S. J., Liu, X., Chance, K., Miller, C. C., Jay, A. S., Ben, V., Bhartia, P. K., Torres, O., Abad, G. G., Haffner, D. P., Ho, K. D., Lee, S. H., Woo, J. H., Chong, H. S., Park, S. S., Nicks, D., and Cho, W. J.: New era of air quality monitoring from space: Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E1–E22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0013.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0013.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Kim, J.: Diurnal variation of atmospheric composition in Asia seen from space: GEMS, ACAM 2023 Workshop, Boulder, CO, 30 May–2 June, <uri>https://www.acom.ucar.edu/webt/ACAM/2023/presentations/O2.03_Kim.pdf</uri> (last access: 6 July 2026), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Klára, Č., Kamil, L., Ladislav, M., and Martin, S.: Intercomparison of Ground- and Satellite-Based Total Ozone Data Products at Marambio Base, Antarctic Peninsula Region, Atmosphere, 10, 721, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos10110721</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Lange, K., Richter, A., Bösch, T., Zilker, B., Latsch, M., Behrens, L. K., Okafor, C. M., Bösch, H., Burrows, J. P., Merlaud, A., Pinardi, G., Fayt, C., Friedrich, M. M., Dimitropoulou, E., Van Roozendael, M., Ziegler, S., Ripperger-Lukosiunaite, S., Kuhn, L., Lauster, B., Wagner, T., Hong, H., Kim, D., Chang, L.-S., Bae, K., Song, C.-K., Park, J.-U., and Lee, H.: Validation of GEMS tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> columns and their diurnal variation with ground-based DOAS measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6315–6344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6315-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-6315-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Li, J. J. and Li, Y.: Impact of Large-Scale Circulations on Ground-Level Ozone Variability over Eastern China, Atmosphere, 15, 1400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121400" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos15121400</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Chen, X. S., Wang, Z. F., Du, H. Y., Yang, W. Y., Sun, Y. L., Hu, B., Li, J. J., Wang, W., Wang, T., Fu, P. Q., and Huang, H. L.: Radiative and heterogeneous chemical effects of aerosols on ozone and inorganic aerosols over East Asia, Sci. Total Environ., 622–623, 1327–1342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Wang, H., Gong, D., Li, Q., Wang, Y., Zhao, W., Zhang, C., Zhou, Z., Zhao, Y., Xu, Q., Zhou, Y., He, C., Ristovski, Z., Morawska, L., Liu, S. C., and Wang, B.: Landscape fragmentation triggers cascading enhancement of surface ozone production, Commun. Earth Environ., 6, 931, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02866-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-025-02866-1</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Li, T. W. and Chen, X.: Estimating daily full-coverage surface ozone concentration using satellite observations and a spatiotemporally embedded deep learning approach, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 101, 102356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAG.2021.102356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.JAG.2021.102356</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y.: Study on Ozone Formation Sensitivity in the Pearl River Delta Based on Satellite Remote Sensing and Air Quality Models, PhD thesis, South China University of Technology, China, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.27151/d.cnki.ghnlu.2021.005599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.27151/d.cnki.ghnlu.2021.005599</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Yu, C., Tao, J., Lu, X., and Chen, L.: Analysis of Ozone Formation Sensitivity in Chinese Representative Regions Using Satellite and Ground-Based Data, Remote Sens., 16, 316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs16020316</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Li, C., Li, Y., Wang, T., Li, M., Qu, Y., Wu, H., Xie, M., and Wang, Y.: Decadal evolution of aerosol-mediated ozone responses in Eastern China under clean air actions and carbon neutrality policies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 1301–1319, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1301-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-26-1301-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Liang, Y. N., Wang, X. H., Qi, S. M., Xu, J. M., and Liu, R.: Analysis of Ozone Formation Sensitivity in Guangdong Province Based on OMI Satellite and Ground Observation Data, Environmental Science, 45, 6248–6254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202311261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13227/j.hjkx.202311261</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lyu, C. G., Zhang, W. M., Zhang, C., Shi, Y. F., Zhang, Y., and Wang, Y. P.: Evaluating the spatial representativeness of ground-based observations for satellite total ozone products, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 129, 103778, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAG.2024.103778" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.JAG.2024.103778</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y. and Wang, T.: Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017 – Part 1: The complex and varying roles of meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6305–6321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6305-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-6305-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Zhang, L., Chen, Y., Zhou, M., Zheng, B., Li, K., Liu, Y., Lin, J., Fu, T.-M., and Zhang, Q.: Exploring 2016–2017 surface ozone pollution over China: source contributions and meteorological influences, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8339–8361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8339-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8339-2019</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Zhang, L., and Shen, L.: Meteorology and Climate Influences on Tropospheric Ozone: a Review of Natural Sources, Chemistry, and Transport Patterns, Current Pollution Reports, 5, 238–260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00118-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40726-019-00118-3</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Mahajan, A. S., Isabelle, D. S., Mriganka, S. B., Sachin, G., Suvarna, F., Chaitri, R., and Michel, V. R.: Inter-annual variations in satellite observations of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde over India, Atmos. Environ., 116, 194–201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.004</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Martin, R. V., Fiore, A. M., and Van Donkelaar, A.: Spacebased diagnosis of surface ozone sensitivity to anthropogenic emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL019416</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Menut, L., Bessagnet, B., Briant, R., Cholakian, A., Couvidat, F., Mailler, S., Pennel, R., Siour, G., Tuccella, P., Turquety, S., and Valari, M.: The CHIMERE v2020r1 online chemistry-transport model, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6781–6811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6781-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-6781-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.: Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Oak, Y. J., Jacob, D. J., Balasus, N., Yang, L. H., Chong, H., Park, J., Lee, H., Lee, G. T., Ha, E. S., Park, R. J., Kwon, H.-A., and Kim, J.: A bias-corrected GEMS geostationary satellite product for nitrogen dioxide using machine learning to enforce consistency with the TROPOMI satellite instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5147–5159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5147-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-5147-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pan, Q. Q.: Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of Ozone and Its Precursors in the Yangtze River Delta Region and Analysis of Ozone Formation Processes under Different NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> Emission Scenarios, PhD thesis, Donghua University, China, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.27012/d.cnki.gdhuu.2023.001648" ext-link-type="DOI">10.27012/d.cnki.gdhuu.2023.001648</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Peng, H. C., Xing, C. Z., Li, Y. K., Zhang, C. X., Lin, J. N., Xue, J. K., Wang, X. H., Song, Y. H., Niu, X. H., and Liu, C.: Studies on regional ozone formation sensitivities and transport with higher spatiotemporal resolutions in a stereoscopic dimension: GEMS and vertical observations, Atmos. Res., 302, 107314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107314" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107314</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Ren, J., Guo, F., and Xie, S.: Diagnosing ozone–NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>–VOC sensitivity and revealing causes of ozone increases in China based on 2013–2021 satellite retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15035–15047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15035-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-15035-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Romer, P. S., Duffey, K. C., Wooldridge, P. J., Edgerton, E., Baumann, K., Feiner, P. A., Miller, D. O., Brune, W. H., Koss, A. R., de Gouw, J. A., Misztal, P. K., Goldstein, A. H., and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of temperature-dependent NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions on continental ozone production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2601–2614, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2601-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2601-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Sillman, S.: The relation between ozone, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and hydrocarbons in urban and polluted rural environments, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1821–1845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00345-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00345-8</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Sillman, S. and He, D.: Some theoretical results concerning O<sub>3</sub>-NO-VOC chemistry and NO-VOC indicators, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH 26-1–ACH 26-15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001123</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Souri, A., Nowlan, C., Wolfe, G., Lamsal, L., Miller, C., Abad, G. G., Janz, S., Fried, A., Blake, D., Weinheimer, A., Diskin, G., Liu, X., and Chance, K.: Revisiting the effectiveness of HCHO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratios for inferring ozone sensitivity to its precursors using high resolution airborne remote sensing observations in a high ozone episode during the KORUS-AQ campaign, Atmos. Environ., 224, 117341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117341" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117341</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Yin, H., Liu, C., Zhang, L., Cheng, Y., Palm, M., Notholt, J., Lu, X., Vigouroux, C., Zheng, B., Wang, W., Jones, N., Shan, C., Qin, M., Tian, Y., Hu, Q., Meng, F., and Liu, J.: Mapping the drivers of formaldehyde (HCHO) variability from 2015 to 2019 over eastern China: insights from Fourier transform infrared observation and GEOS-Chem model simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6365–6387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6365-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6365-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Tan, Z., Lu, K., Jiang, M., Su, R., Wang, H., Lou, S., Fu, Q., Zhai, C., Tan, Q., Yue, D., Chen, D., Wang, Z., Xie, S., Zeng, L., and Zhang, Y.: Daytime atmospheric oxidation capacity in four Chinese megacities during the photochemically polluted season: a case study based on box model simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3493–3513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3493-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3493-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Tang, G., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ji, D., Hsu, S., and Gao, X.: Spatial-temporal variations in surface ozone in Northern China as observed during 2009–2010 and possible implications for future air quality control strategies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2757–2776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2757-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2757-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Trainer, M., Williams, E. J., Parrish, D. D., Buhr, M. P., Allwine, E. J., Westberg, H. H., Fehsenfeld, F. C., and Liu, S. C.: Models and observations of the impact of natural hydrocarbons on rural ozone, Nature, 329, 705–707, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/329705a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/329705a0</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Huo, J., Yang, G., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Wu, S., Yao, L., Fu, Q., and Wang, L.: Measurement report: Production and loss of atmospheric formaldehyde at a suburban site of Shanghai in summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2997–3014, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2997-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-2997-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Wu, W. L., Xue, W. B., Lei, Y., and Wang, J. N.: Sensitivity of Ozone Formation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region and Surrounding Areas Based on OMI Data, China Environmental Science, 38, 1201–1208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2018.0143" ext-link-type="DOI">10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2018.0143</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Wang, R., Bei, N., Tie, X., Wu, J., Liu, S., Li, X., Yu, J., Jiang, Q., and Li, G.: Effects of hydroperoxy radical heterogeneous loss on the summertime ozone formation in the North China Plain, Sci. Total Environ., 825, 153993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153993" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153993</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Wang, R. F., Ma, X. D., Zhao, T. L., Wang, H. L., Ding, H., and Zheng, X. B.: Evaluation of the Applicability of MACC Reanalysis Ozone Data over China Using Ground-Based Observations and AIRS Satellite Data, Environmental Science, 40, 4412–4422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201904029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13227/j.hjkx.201904029</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., van der A, R., Ding, J., van Weele, M., and Cheng, T.: Spatial and temporal changes of the ozone sensitivity in China based on satellite and ground-based observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7253–7269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7253-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-7253-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Li, X., Cheng, Y., Parrish, D. D., Ni, R., Tan, Z., Liu, Y., Lu, S., Wu, Y., and Chen, S.: Ozone pollution mitigation strategy informed by long-term trends of atmospheric oxidation capacity, Nat. Geosci., 17, 20–25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01334-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-023-01334-9</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Lampel, J., Xie, P., Beirle, S., Li, A., Wu, D., and Wagner, T.: Ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of tropospheric aerosols, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO in Wuxi, China, from 2011 to 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2189–2215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2189-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2189-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Wei, C. B., Yu, G. H., Cao, L. M., Han, H. X., Xia, S. Y., and Huang, X. F.: Tempo-spacial variation and source apportionment of atmospheric formaldehyde in the Pearl River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 312, 120016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120016</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Xie, M., Zhu, K., Wang, T., Chen, P., Han, Y., Li, S., Zhuang, B., and Shu, L.: Temporal characterization and regional contribution to O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> at an urban and a suburban site in Nanjing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 551–552, 533–545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.047</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation> Xu, J., Zhang, Z., Rao, L. L., Wang, Y. P., Yan, H. H., Hu, S. T., Shi, C., Liu, S., Gegen, T., Wang, W. Y., Shi, E., Yao, S., Zhu, J., Wang, Y. M., Dong, X. L., and Shi, J. C.: Tropospheric ozone retrieval from satellite remote sensing – a review, Advances in Earth Science, 39, 56–70, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W., Yang, H., He, M., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z. H., and He, Y. M.: Spatiotemporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Ozone Formation Sensitivity in the Chengdu-Chongqing Region, Environmental Science, 46, 736–745, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202312065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13227/j.hjkx.202312065</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Xia, N., Du, E. Z., Guo, Z. D., and Wim, D. V.: The diurnal cycle of summer tropospheric ozone concentrations across Chinese cities: Spatial patterns and main drivers, Environ. Pollut., 286, 117547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/</ext-link> 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117547, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Yao, C., Yang, X., Huang, D. D., Donger, L., Yi, C., Guo, J., Xin, F., Hui, L. R., Wang, Q., Huang, C., Wang, H. L., and Wang, Z.: Photochemical impacts of atmospheric carbonyl compounds on ozone formation and radical chemistry in urban Shanghai, Environ. Pollut., 380, 126557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/</ext-link> 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126557, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Yu, L., Cheng, M. M., Guo, Z., Zhang, X. Y., Cui, X. M., and Chen, S. G.: Increase in Surface Ozone over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the Surrounding Areas of China Inferred from Satellite Retrievals, 2005–2018, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 20, 2170–2184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.11.0603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2019.11.0603</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Wu, K., Wang, H., Liu, Y., and Wang, Z.: Summertime ozone pollution in Sichuan Basin, China: Meteorological conditions, sources and process analysis, Atmos. Environ., 226, 117392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117392" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117392</ext-link>, 2020. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y. M, Li, X., Zu, K. X., Lian, C. F., Chen, S. Y., Dong, H. B., Feng, M., Liu, H. F., Liu, J. W., Lu, K. D., Lu, S. H., Ma, X. F., Song, D. L., Wang, W. G., Yang, S. D., Yang, X. P., Yu, X. N., Zhu, Y., Zeng, L. M., Tan, Q. W., and Zhang, Y. H.: Elucidating the effect of HONO on O<sub>3</sub> pollution by a case study in southwest China, Sci. Total Environ., 756, 144127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144127</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Shi, C., Ying, C., Weng, S., Ni, E., Zhao, L., Yang, P., Tang, K., Zhou, X., Ren, C., Chi, X., Zhou, D., Li, M., Li, N., Liu, T., and Huang, X.: HONO formation mechanisms and impacts on ambient oxidants in coastal regions of Fujian, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 16797–16816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16797-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-16797-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. X., Gao, Y., Leung, L. R., Luo, K., Wang, M. H., Zhang, Y., Bell, M. L., and Fan, J. R.: Disentangling the mechanism of temperature and water vapor modulation on ozone under a warming climate, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 124032, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ACA3BC" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ACA3BC</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K. and Batterman, S. A.: Time allocation shifts and pollutant exposure due to traffic congestion: an analysis using the national human activity pattern survey, Sci. Total Environ., 407, 5493–5500, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.008</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>O<sub>3</sub>–NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>–VOCs sensitivity in major Chinese regions: detailed insights from GEMS satellite hourly observations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Acdan, J. J. M., Pierce, R. B., Dickens, A. F., Adelman, Z., and Nergui, T.: Examining TROPOMI formaldehyde to nitrogen dioxide ratios in the Lake Michigan region: implications for ozone exceedances, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7867–7885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7867-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7867-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Akimoto, H.: Global Air Quality and Pollution, Science, 302, 1716–1719,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092666" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092666</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bae, K., Song, C.-K., Van Roozendael, M., Richter, A., Wagner, T., Merlaud,
A., Pinardi, G., Friedrich, M. M., Fayt, C., Dimitropoulou, E., Lange, K.,
Bösch, T., Zilker, B., Latsch, M., Behrens, L. K., Ziegler, S.,
Ripperger-Lukosiūnaitė, S., Kuhn, L., Lauster, B., Reischmann, L.,
Uhlmannsiek, K., Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Gebetsberger, M., Park, R. J.,
Lee, H., Hong, H., Chang, L. S., and Jeon, K.: Validation of GEMS
operational v2.0 total column NO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO during the GMAP/SIJAQ
campaign, Sci. Total Environ., 974, 179190,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179190" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179190</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bottorff, B., Lew, M. M., Woo, Y., Rickly, P., Rollings, M. D., Deming, B., Anderson, D. C., Wood, E., Alwe, H. D., Millet, D. B., Weinheimer, A., Tyndall, G., Ortega, J., Dusanter, S., Leonardis, T., Flynn, J., Erickson, M., Alvarez, S., Rivera-Rios, J. C., Shutter, J. D., Keutsch, F., Helmig, D., Wang, W., Allen, H. M., Slade, J. H., Shepson, P. B., Bertman, S., and Stevens, P. S.: OH, HO<sub>2</sub>, and RO<sub>2</sub> radical chemistry in a rural forest environment: measurements, model comparisons, and evidence of a missing radical sink, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10287–10311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10287-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10287-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Camalier, L., Cox, W., and Dolwick, P.: The effects of meteorology on ozone
in urban areas and their use in assessing ozone trends, Atmos. Environ., 41,
7127–7137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.061</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, C. Y., Faust, E., Hou, X. T., Lee, P. K., Hyun, C. K., Brent, C. H.,
and Liao, K. J.: Investigating ambient ozone formation regimes in
neighboring cities of shale plays in the Northeast United States using
photochemical modeling and satellite retrievals, Atmos. Environ., 142,
152–170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.058</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, T. Z., Chu, B. W., Ma, J. Z., Ma, Q. X., Liu, Q., Wang, S. X., He, K. B., Zhao, J. C., and He, H.: Ozone Pollution in China: Current Status and Control Strategies, Engineering, 60, 15–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.06.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.06.044</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Coates, J., Mar, K. A., Ojha, N., and Butler, T. M.: The influence of temperature on ozone production under varying NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> conditions – a modelling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11601–11615, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11601-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11601-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duncan, B. N., Yoshida, Y., Olson, J. R., Sillman, S., Martin, R. V.,
Lamsal, L., Hu, Y., Pickering, K. E., Retscher, C., Allen, D. J., and
Crawford, J. H.: Application of OMI observations to a space-based indicator
of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and VOC controls on surface ozone formation, Atmos.
Environ., 44, 2213–2223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.010</a>,
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dyson, J. E., Whalley, L. K., Slater, E. J., Woodward-Massey, R., Ye, C., Lee, J. D., Squires, F., Hopkins, J. R., Dunmore, R. E., Shaw, M., Hamilton, J. F., Lewis, A. C., Worrall, S. D., Bacak, A., Mehra, A., Bannan, T. J., Coe, H., Percival, C. J., Ouyang, B., Hewitt, C. N., Jones, R. L., Crilley, L. R., Kramer, L. J., Acton, W. J. F., Bloss, W. J., Saksakulkrai, S., Xu, J., Shi, Z., Harrison, R. M., Kotthaus, S., Grimmond, S., Sun, Y., Xu, W., Yue, S., Wei, L., Fu, P., Wang, X., Arnold, S. R., and Heard, D. E.: Impact of HO<sub>2</sub> aerosol uptake on radical levels and O<sub>3</sub> production during summertime in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5679–5697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5679-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elise, P. and Tracey, H.: Evaluating current satellite capability to
observe diurnal change in nitrogen oxides in preparation for geostationary
satellite missions, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 034038,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6b36" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6b36</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, Z. Z., Xu, Y. S., Kobayashi, K., Dai, L. L., Zhang, T. Y.,
Agathokleous, E., Calatayud, V., Paoletti, E., Mukherjee, A., Agrawal, M.,
Park, R. J., Oak, Y. J., and Yue, X.: Ozone pollution threatens the
production of major staple crops in East Asia, Nature Food, 3, 47–56,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/S43016-021-00422-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/S43016-021-00422-6</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fiore, A. M., Jacob, D. J., Bey, I., Yantosca, R. M., Field, B. D., and Fusco, A. C.: Background ozone over the United States in summer: origin, trend, and contribution to pollution episodes, J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACH 11-1–ACH 11-25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000982" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000982</a>, 2002

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fu, W., Zhu, L., Kwon, H. A., Park, R. J., Lee, G. T., De Smedt, I., Liu,
S., Li, X., Chen, Y., Pu, D., Li, J., Zuo, X., Zhang, P., Li, Y., Yan, Z.,
Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Wu, X., Shen, H., Ye, J., Wang, C., Fu, T.-M., and
Yang, X.: Evaluating GEMS HCHO retrievals with TROPOMI product, Pandora
observations, and GEOS-Chem simulations, Earth Space Sci., 12,
e2024EA003894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EA003894" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EA003894</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Georgiana, G., Sabina, Ş., Constantin, R., and Cristinel, G.: Assessing
of surface-ozone concentration in Bucharest, Romania, using OML and
satellite data, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 7, 567–576,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.02.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.02.001</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guicai, N., Wardle, D. A., and Yim, S. H. L.: Suppression of ozone formation at high temperature in China: from historical observations to future projections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097090" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097090</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Q.: NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission inversion and near-surface NO<sub>2</sub> estimation
based on TROPOMI and GEMS, Ph.D. thesis, School of Environment and
Surveying, China University of Mining and Technology, China, 136 pp.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.27623/d.cnki.gzkyu.2025.000172" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.27623/d.cnki.gzkyu.2025.000172</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Itahashi, S., Irie, H., Shimadera, H., and Chatani, S.: Fifteen-Year Trends (2005–2019) in the Satellite-Derived Ozone-Sensitive Regime in East Asia: A Gradual Shift from VOC-Sensitive to NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-Sensitive, Remote Sensing, 14, 4512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184512" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184512</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jacob, D. J.: Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, Atmos.
Environ., 34, 2131–2159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00462-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00462-8</a>,
2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jairo, V. S., Hata, H., Martinez-Noriega, E. J., and Inoue, K.: Ozone trends and their sensitivity in global megacities under the warming climate, Nat. Commun., 15, 10236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54490-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54490-w</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Javed, Z., Liu, C., Khokhar, M. F., Tan, W., Liu, H., Xing, C., Ji, X.,
Tanvir, A., Hong, Q., and Sandhu, O.: Ground-Based MAX-DOAS Observations of
CHOCHO and HCHO in Beijing and Baoding, China, Remote Sens., 11, 1524,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131524</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jin, X. and Holloway, T.: Spatial and temporal variability of ozone
sensitivity over China observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7229–7246,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023250" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023250</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jin, X. M., Arlene, M. F., Lee, T. M., Lukas, C. V., Lok, N. L., Bryan, D.
K., Folkert, B., Isabelle, D. S., Gonzalo, G. A., Kelly, C., and Gail, S.
T.: Evaluating a space-based indicator of surface ozone-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-VOC
sensitivity over midlatitude source regions and application to decadal
trends, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 10439–10461,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026720" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026720</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ju, T., Wang, L., Li, B., Lv, Z., and Gu, Z.: Study on correlation between
atmospheric pollutants and meteorological factors during extreme weather in
Mexico based on GTWR model, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 18, 1–17,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-025-01724-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-025-01724-5</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, J., Jeong, U., Ahn, M. H., Kim, J. H., Park, R. J., Lee, H. L., Song,
C. H., Choi, Y. S., Lee, K. H., Yoo, J. M., Jeong, M. J., Park, S. K., Lee,
K. M., Song, C. K., Kim, S. W., Kim, Y. J., Kim, S. W., Kim, M. J., Go, S.
J., Liu, X., Chance, K., Miller, C. C., Jay, A. S., Ben, V., Bhartia, P. K.,
Torres, O., Abad, G. G., Haffner, D. P., Ho, K. D., Lee, S. H., Woo, J. H.,
Chong, H. S., Park, S. S., Nicks, D., and Cho, W. J.: New era of air quality
monitoring from space: Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer
(GEMS), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E1–E22,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0013.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0013.1</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, J.: Diurnal variation of atmospheric composition in Asia seen from
space: GEMS, ACAM 2023 Workshop, Boulder, CO, 30 May–2 June,
<a href="https://www.acom.ucar.edu/webt/ACAM/2023/presentations/O2.03_Kim.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 6 July 2026), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Klára, Č., Kamil, L., Ladislav, M., and Martin, S.: Intercomparison
of Ground- and Satellite-Based Total Ozone Data Products at Marambio Base,
Antarctic Peninsula Region, Atmosphere, 10, 721,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110721</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lange, K., Richter, A., Bösch, T., Zilker, B., Latsch, M., Behrens, L. K., Okafor, C. M., Bösch, H., Burrows, J. P., Merlaud, A., Pinardi, G., Fayt, C., Friedrich, M. M., Dimitropoulou, E., Van Roozendael, M., Ziegler, S., Ripperger-Lukosiunaite, S., Kuhn, L., Lauster, B., Wagner, T., Hong, H., Kim, D., Chang, L.-S., Bae, K., Song, C.-K., Park, J.-U., and Lee, H.: Validation of GEMS tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> columns and their diurnal variation with ground-based DOAS measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6315–6344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6315-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6315-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J. J. and Li, Y.: Impact of Large-Scale Circulations on Ground-Level
Ozone Variability over Eastern China, Atmosphere, 15, 1400,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121400" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121400</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Chen, X. S., Wang, Z. F., Du, H. Y., Yang, W. Y., Sun, Y. L., Hu,
B., Li, J. J., Wang, W., Wang, T., Fu, P. Q., and Huang, H. L.: Radiative
and heterogeneous chemical effects of aerosols on ozone and inorganic
aerosols over East Asia, Sci. Total Environ., 622–623,
1327–1342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Wang, H., Gong, D., Li, Q., Wang, Y., Zhao, W., Zhang, C., Zhou, Z.,
Zhao, Y., Xu, Q., Zhou, Y., He, C., Ristovski, Z., Morawska, L., Liu, S. C.,
and Wang, B.: Landscape fragmentation triggers cascading enhancement of
surface ozone production, Commun. Earth Environ., 6, 931,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02866-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02866-1</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, T. W. and Chen, X.: Estimating daily full-coverage surface ozone
concentration using satellite observations and a spatiotemporally embedded
deep learning approach, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 101, 102356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAG.2021.102356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAG.2021.102356</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Y.: Study on Ozone Formation Sensitivity in the Pearl River Delta Based
on Satellite Remote Sensing and Air Quality Models, PhD thesis, South
China University of Technology, China,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.27151/d.cnki.ghnlu.2021.005599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.27151/d.cnki.ghnlu.2021.005599</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Y., Yu, C., Tao, J., Lu, X., and Chen, L.: Analysis of Ozone Formation
Sensitivity in Chinese Representative Regions Using Satellite and
Ground-Based Data, Remote Sens., 16, 316,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020316" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020316</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Y., Li, C., Li, Y., Wang, T., Li, M., Qu, Y., Wu, H., Xie, M., and Wang, Y.: Decadal evolution of aerosol-mediated ozone responses in Eastern China under clean air actions and carbon neutrality policies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 1301–1319, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1301-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1301-2026</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liang, Y. N., Wang, X. H., Qi, S. M., Xu, J. M., and Liu, R.: Analysis of
Ozone Formation Sensitivity in Guangdong Province Based on OMI Satellite and
Ground Observation Data, Environmental Science, 45, 6248–6254,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202311261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202311261</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lyu, C. G., Zhang, W. M., Zhang, C., Shi, Y. F., Zhang, Y., and Wang, Y. P.:
Evaluating the spatial representativeness of ground-based observations for
satellite total ozone products, Int. J. Appl. Earth
Obs., 129, 103778,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAG.2024.103778" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAG.2024.103778</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y. and Wang, T.: Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017 – Part 1: The complex and varying roles of meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6305–6321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6305-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6305-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, X., Zhang, L., Chen, Y., Zhou, M., Zheng, B., Li, K., Liu, Y., Lin, J., Fu, T.-M., and Zhang, Q.: Exploring 2016–2017 surface ozone pollution over China: source contributions and meteorological influences, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8339–8361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8339-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8339-2019</a>, 2019a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, X., Zhang, L., and Shen, L.: Meteorology and Climate Influences on
Tropospheric Ozone: a Review of Natural Sources, Chemistry, and Transport
Patterns, Current Pollution Reports, 5, 238–260,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00118-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00118-3</a>, 2019b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mahajan, A. S., Isabelle, D. S., Mriganka, S. B., Sachin, G., Suvarna, F.,
Chaitri, R., and Michel, V. R.: Inter-annual variations in satellite
observations of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde over India, Atmos.
Environ., 116, 194–201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.004</a>,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martin, R. V., Fiore, A. M., and Van Donkelaar, A.: Spacebased diagnosis of surface ozone sensitivity to anthropogenic emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019416" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019416</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Menut, L., Bessagnet, B., Briant, R., Cholakian, A., Couvidat, F., Mailler, S., Pennel, R., Siour, G., Tuccella, P., Turquety, S., and Valari, M.: The CHIMERE v2020r1 online chemistry-transport model, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6781–6811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6781-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6781-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.: Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oak, Y. J., Jacob, D. J., Balasus, N., Yang, L. H., Chong, H., Park, J., Lee, H., Lee, G. T., Ha, E. S., Park, R. J., Kwon, H.-A., and Kim, J.: A bias-corrected GEMS geostationary satellite product for nitrogen dioxide using machine learning to enforce consistency with the TROPOMI satellite instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5147–5159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5147-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5147-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pan, Q. Q.: Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of Ozone and Its
Precursors in the Yangtze River Delta Region and Analysis of Ozone Formation
Processes under Different NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Emission Scenarios, PhD thesis, Donghua
University, China, <a href="https://doi.org/10.27012/d.cnki.gdhuu.2023.001648" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.27012/d.cnki.gdhuu.2023.001648</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peng, H. C., Xing, C. Z., Li, Y. K., Zhang, C. X., Lin, J. N., Xue, J. K.,
Wang, X. H., Song, Y. H., Niu, X. H., and Liu, C.: Studies on regional ozone
formation sensitivities and transport with higher spatiotemporal resolutions
in a stereoscopic dimension: GEMS and vertical observations, Atmos.
Res., 302, 107314, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107314" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107314</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ren, J., Guo, F., and Xie, S.: Diagnosing ozone–NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>–VOC sensitivity and revealing causes of ozone increases in China based on 2013–2021 satellite retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15035–15047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15035-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15035-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Romer, P. S., Duffey, K. C., Wooldridge, P. J., Edgerton, E., Baumann, K., Feiner, P. A., Miller, D. O., Brune, W. H., Koss, A. R., de Gouw, J. A., Misztal, P. K., Goldstein, A. H., and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of temperature-dependent NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions on continental ozone production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2601–2614, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2601-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2601-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sillman, S.: The relation between ozone, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and hydrocarbons in urban
and polluted rural environments, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1821–1845,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00345-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00345-8</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sillman, S. and He, D.: Some theoretical results concerning O<sub>3</sub>-NO-VOC
chemistry and NO-VOC indicators, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH 26-1–ACH 26-15,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001123</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Souri, A., Nowlan, C., Wolfe, G., Lamsal, L., Miller, C., Abad, G. G., Janz,
S., Fried, A., Blake, D., Weinheimer, A., Diskin, G., Liu, X., and Chance,
K.: Revisiting the effectiveness of HCHO&thinsp;∕&thinsp;NO<sub>2</sub> ratios for inferring ozone
sensitivity to its precursors using high resolution airborne remote sensing
observations in a high ozone episode during the KORUS-AQ campaign, Atmos.
Environ., 224, 117341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117341" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117341</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, Y., Yin, H., Liu, C., Zhang, L., Cheng, Y., Palm, M., Notholt, J., Lu, X., Vigouroux, C., Zheng, B., Wang, W., Jones, N., Shan, C., Qin, M., Tian, Y., Hu, Q., Meng, F., and Liu, J.: Mapping the drivers of formaldehyde (HCHO) variability from 2015 to 2019 over eastern China: insights from Fourier transform infrared observation and GEOS-Chem model simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6365–6387, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6365-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6365-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tan, Z., Lu, K., Jiang, M., Su, R., Wang, H., Lou, S., Fu, Q., Zhai, C., Tan, Q., Yue, D., Chen, D., Wang, Z., Xie, S., Zeng, L., and Zhang, Y.: Daytime atmospheric oxidation capacity in four Chinese megacities during the photochemically polluted season: a case study based on box model simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3493–3513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3493-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3493-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, G., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ji, D., Hsu, S., and Gao, X.: Spatial-temporal variations in surface ozone in Northern China as observed during 2009–2010 and possible implications for future air quality control strategies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2757–2776, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2757-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2757-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trainer, M., Williams, E. J., Parrish, D. D., Buhr, M. P., Allwine, E. J.,
Westberg, H. H., Fehsenfeld, F. C., and Liu, S. C.: Models and observations
of the impact of natural hydrocarbons on rural ozone, Nature, 329, 705–707,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/329705a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/329705a0</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, Y., Huo, J., Yang, G., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Wu, S., Yao, L., Fu, Q., and Wang, L.: Measurement report: Production and loss of atmospheric formaldehyde at a suburban site of Shanghai in summertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2997–3014, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2997-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2997-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, W. L., Xue, W. B., Lei, Y., and Wang, J. N.: Sensitivity of Ozone
Formation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region and Surrounding Areas Based on
OMI Data, China Environmental Science, 38, 1201–1208,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2018.0143" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2018.0143</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, R., Bei, N., Tie, X., Wu, J., Liu, S., Li, X., Yu, J., Jiang, Q., and
Li, G.: Effects of hydroperoxy radical heterogeneous loss on the summertime
ozone formation in the North China Plain, Sci. Total Environ., 825, 153993,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153993" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153993</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, R. F., Ma, X. D., Zhao, T. L., Wang, H. L., Ding, H., and Zheng, X.
B.: Evaluation of the Applicability of MACC Reanalysis Ozone Data over China
Using Ground-Based Observations and AIRS Satellite Data, Environmental
Science, 40, 4412–4422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201904029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201904029</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, W., van der A, R., Ding, J., van Weele, M., and Cheng, T.: Spatial and temporal changes of the ozone sensitivity in China based on satellite and ground-based observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7253–7269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7253-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7253-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, W., Li, X., Cheng, Y., Parrish, D. D., Ni, R., Tan, Z., Liu, Y., Lu,
S., Wu, Y., and Chen, S.: Ozone pollution mitigation strategy informed by
long-term trends of atmospheric oxidation capacity, Nat. Geosci., 17,
20–25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01334-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01334-9</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Lampel, J., Xie, P., Beirle, S., Li, A., Wu, D., and Wagner, T.: Ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of tropospheric aerosols, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO in Wuxi, China, from 2011 to 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2189–2215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2189-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2189-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, C. B., Yu, G. H., Cao, L. M., Han, H. X., Xia, S. Y., and Huang, X. F.:
Tempo-spacial variation and source apportionment of atmospheric formaldehyde
in the Pearl River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 312, 120016,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120016</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xie, M., Zhu, K., Wang, T., Chen, P., Han, Y., Li, S., Zhuang, B., and Shu, L.: Temporal characterization and regional contribution to O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> at an urban and a suburban site in Nanjing, China, Sci. Total Environ., 551–552, 533–545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.047</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, J., Zhang, Z., Rao, L. L., Wang, Y. P., Yan, H. H., Hu, S. T., Shi, C.,
Liu, S., Gegen, T., Wang, W. Y., Shi, E., Yao, S., Zhu, J., Wang, Y. M.,
Dong, X. L., and Shi, J. C.: Tropospheric ozone retrieval from satellite
remote sensing – a review, Advances in Earth Science, 39, 56–70,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, W., Yang, H., He, M., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z. H., and He, Y. M.:
Spatiotemporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Ozone Formation
Sensitivity in the Chengdu-Chongqing Region, Environmental Science, 46,
736–745, <a href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202312065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202312065</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xia, N., Du, E. Z., Guo, Z. D., and Wim, D. V.: The diurnal cycle of summer
tropospheric ozone concentrations across Chinese cities: Spatial patterns
and main drivers, Environ. Pollut., 286, 117547,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/</a> 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117547, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yao, C., Yang, X., Huang, D. D., Donger, L., Yi, C., Guo, J., Xin, F., Hui,
L. R., Wang, Q., Huang, C., Wang, H. L., and Wang, Z.: Photochemical impacts
of atmospheric carbonyl compounds on ozone formation and radical chemistry
in urban Shanghai, Environ. Pollut., 380, 126557,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/</a> 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126557, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, L., Cheng, M. M., Guo, Z., Zhang, X. Y., Cui, X. M., and Chen, S. G.:
Increase in Surface Ozone over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the Surrounding
Areas of China Inferred from Satellite Retrievals, 2005–2018, Aerosol
Air Qual. Res., 20, 2170–2184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.11.0603" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.11.0603</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, X., Wu, K., Wang, H., Liu, Y., and Wang, Z.: Summertime ozone
pollution in Sichuan Basin, China: Meteorological conditions, sources and
process analysis, Atmos. Environ., 226, 117392,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117392" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117392</a>, 2020.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Y. M, Li, X., Zu, K. X., Lian, C. F., Chen, S. Y., Dong, H. B., Feng,
M., Liu, H. F., Liu, J. W., Lu, K. D., Lu, S. H., Ma, X. F., Song, D. L.,
Wang, W. G., Yang, S. D., Yang, X. P., Yu, X. N., Zhu, Y., Zeng, L. M., Tan,
Q. W., and Zhang, Y. H.: Elucidating the effect of HONO on O<sub>3</sub> pollution
by a case study in southwest China, Sci. Total Environ., 756, 144127,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144127</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, H., Shi, C., Ying, C., Weng, S., Ni, E., Zhao, L., Yang, P., Tang, K., Zhou, X., Ren, C., Chi, X., Zhou, D., Li, M., Li, N., Liu, T., and Huang, X.: HONO formation mechanisms and impacts on ambient oxidants in coastal regions of Fujian, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 16797–16816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16797-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16797-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, J. X., Gao, Y., Leung, L. R., Luo, K., Wang, M. H., Zhang, Y., Bell,
M. L., and Fan, J. R.: Disentangling the mechanism of temperature and water
vapor modulation on ozone under a warming climate, Environ. Res.
Lett., 17, 124032, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ACA3BC" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ACA3BC</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, K. and Batterman, S. A.: Time allocation shifts and pollutant
exposure due to traffic congestion: an analysis using the national human
activity pattern survey, Sci. Total Environ., 407, 5493–5500,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.008</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
