<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-25-727-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Measurement report: Analysis of aerosol optical depth variation at Zhongshan Station in Antarctica</article-title><alt-title>AOD variation at Zhongshan, Antarctica​​​​​​​</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Lijing</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3695-5214</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Lei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>She</surname><given-names>Yong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Zhaoliang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Yu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Biao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Wenqian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Zhaohui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Che</surname><given-names>Huizheng</given-names></name>
          <email>chehz@cma.gov.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-3387</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>Minghu</given-names></name>
          <email>dingminghu@foxmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1142-6598</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Sounding, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, 610103, China​​​​​​​</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Polar Surveying and Mapping Engineering Center of Heilongjiang Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, Harbin 150081, China</institution>
        </aff><author-comment content-type="econtrib"><p>These authors contributed equally to this work.</p></author-comment>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Huizheng Che (chehz@cma.gov.cn) and Minghu Ding (dingminghu@foxmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>January</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>727</fpage><lpage>739</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>March</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>July</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>November</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>November</month><year>2024</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Lijing Chen et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/acp-25-727-2025.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/acp-25-727-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/acp-25-727-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/acp-25-727-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e187">Our understanding of aerosol optical depth (AOD) in Antarctica remains limited due to the scarcity of ground observation stations and limited daylight days. Utilizing data from the CE318-T photometer spanning January 2020 to April 2023 at Zhongshan Station, we analyzed the seasonal, monthly, and diurnal variations in AOD and the Ångström exponent (AE). AOD median values increased from spring (0.033) to winter (0.115), while AE peaked during summer (1.010) and autumn (1.034), declining in winter (0.381), indicating a transition in dominant aerosol particle size from fine to coarse mode between summer and winter. Monthly mean AOD variation closely paralleled the proportion of AE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, suggesting fluctuations in coarse-mode particle proportions drive AOD variation. The high AOD values during winter and spring were associated with an increased contribution of coarse-mode particles, while high AOD values during summer and autumn were associated with the growth of fine-mode particles. We observed a peak in AOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06) at 14:00 local time (LT) at Zhongshan Station, possibly associated with a slight decrease in boundary layer height (BLH). Additionally, higher (lower) wind speeds corresponded to lower (higher) AOD values, indicating the diffusion (accumulation) effect. The temperature and AOD showed an insignificant positive correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40), and relative humidity exhibited a significant negative correlation with AOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.59, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02). Backward trajectory analysis revealed that coarse particles from the ocean predominantly contributed to high AOD daily mean values, while fine particles on low-AOD days originated mainly from the air mass over the Antarctic Plateau.</p>

      <p id="d2e268">This study enhances the understanding of the optical properties and seasonal behaviors of aerosols in the coastal Antarctic. Specifically, AOD measurements during the polar night address the lack of validation data for winter AOD simulations. Additionally, we revealed that lower wind speeds, higher temperatures, and lower relative humidity contribute to increased AOD at Zhongshan Station, and air masses from the ocean significantly impact local AOD levels. These findings help us infer AOD variation patterns in the coastal Antarctic based on meteorological changes, providing valuable insights for climate modeling in the context of global climate change.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42122047</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2021YFC2802504</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences</funding-source>
<award-id>2023Z015</award-id>
<award-id>2023Z025</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.Sx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Key points</title>
      <p id="d2e278"><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>

      <p id="d2e284">The AOD level over Zhongshan Station in Antarctica is low in summer and high in winter. AE indicates the dominance of fine (coarse) aerosols in summer (winter).</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p id="d2e291">In winter and spring, high AOD values are related to the increase in coarse-mode particles, while in summer and autumn, high AOD values may be related to the growth of fine-mode particles.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p id="d2e298">AOD varied inversely with wind speed and showed an insignificant positive correlation with temperature but a significant negative correlation with relative humidity.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e312">Aerosols play an important role in impacting the climate system by absorbing and scattering solar radiation (Li et al., 2022). Antarctica, considered one of the most pristine lands, serves as an ideal background area for evaluating the climate effects of aerosols (Pant et al., 2022). Marine aerosols emitted from the Southern Ocean are a primary source contributing to the aerosol load in Antarctica (Thakur, 2019). The retreat of sea ice in Antarctica is expected to escalate the release of sea salt and secondary biogenic aerosols (Yan et al., 2020). Sea salt particles with strong scattering may produce negative effective radiative forcing or indirect radiative effect by influencing cloud condensation nuclei within the marine boundary layer over Antarctica (Thornhill et al., 2021; Udisti et al., 2012). However, the heating effect of absorbent aerosols, such as black carbon (BC), may be amplified by the high surface albedo in Antarctica (Kang et al., 2020). In recent years, there has been a notable increase in BC concentrations in Antarctica, with BC deposition on snow and ice surfaces contributing to reduced surface albedo and increased solar radiation absorption, subsequently accelerating snow and ice melt (Kannemadugu et al., 2023). Given the close connection between aerosol radiation effects and their optical properties (Che et al., 2024), it is necessary to investigate the optical parameters of Antarctica aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d2e316">Aerosol optical depth (AOD), as a key parameter of aerosol optical properties, serves as an effective measure of aerosol load and can influence the solar radiation components (Alghoul et al., 2009). AOD observation records from Antarctica sites indicate that the values range from 0.006 to 0.220 in coastal regions and from 0.007 to 0.034 in inland regions (Kannemadugu et al., 2023; Tomasi et al., 2007, 2012; Yang et al., 2021). Typically, coastal aerosols consist primarily of coarse-mode sea salt particles during austral winter, while fine-mode particles (such as dimethyl sulfide and its oxidation product mesylate, DMS, and MSA) lead to elevated particle number concentrations in summer (20–100 times higher than in winter) (Lachlan-Cope et al., 2020; Shaw, 1979). Conversely, aerosols over the Antarctic Plateau predominantly comprise fine-mode particles of non-sea-salt sulfate (NSS) and DMS (Harder et al., 2000; Walters et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d2e319">Additionally, particle size plays a significant role in aerosol extinction. The Ångström exponent (AE) serves as an important indicator of aerosol size, with values greater (less) than 1 indicating a predominance of fine-mode (coarse-mode) particles (Schuster et al., 2006). Weller and Lampert (2008) report that the mean AE at Neumayer Station was 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 and 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 during summer and winter, respectively, suggesting an increased contribution of fine-mode biological sulfate particles in summer. Virkkula et al. (2022)​​​​​​​ observed higher scattering AE estimate values during summer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9) and lower values during winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8) at Dome C on the Antarctic Plateau, indicating a prevalence of fine particles in summer (Virkkula et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d2e350">Currently, the challenging environment and the limited number of daylight days per year restrict the availability of ground sites capable of obtaining adequate AOD and AE observations. Consequently, the optical properties of aerosols across large parts of Antarctica remain unexplored. To improve our comprehension of aerosol properties in Antarctica, we analyze the seasonal, monthly, and diurnal variations of AOD and AE using data obtained from the recently installed sun–sky–lunar CE318-T photometer at Zhongshan Station.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Site, instrument, and data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e368">Zhongshan Station (69°22<sup>′</sup>12<sup>′′</sup> S, 76°21<sup>′</sup>49<sup>′′</sup> E; 18 m a.s.l.) is located in the Larsemann Hills of Prydz Bay on the East Antarctic continent. The sun–sky–lunar CE318-T photometer is installed at Swan Ridge, northwest of the Nella fjord (Fig. 1) (Tian et al., 2022). This location experiences 54 polar days and 58 polar nights annually, with snow covering the surrounding surface during winter and revealing bare rock in summer. In this study, the austral spring, summer, autumn, and winter are referred to the season from September to November (SON), December to February of next year (DJF), March to May (MAM), and June to August (JJA), respectively. The average annual air temperature is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 °C, with a relative humidity of 58 % and prevailing wind speeds of 6.9 m s<sup>−1</sup>, primarily from the east or east-southeast direction (Ding et al., 2022).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e435"><bold>(a)</bold> The location of Zhongshan Station in Antarctica, <bold>(b)</bold> the aerial view of Zhongshan Station, and <bold>(c)</bold> the sun–sky–lunar photometer CE318-T at Zhongshan Station.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/727/2025/acp-25-727-2025-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Instrument and data</title>
      <p id="d2e460">The AOD measurement data utilized in this study were obtained from the sun–sky–lunar CE318-T photometer, manufactured by CIMEL Electronique, France. The CE318-T is a ground-based multiband radiometer capable of inverting aerosol optical parameters by measuring the spectral data of direct solar and lunar radiation extinction and the angular distribution of sky radiances (Barreto et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e463">We collected AOD level 1.5 (cloud-screened) data across various wavelengths spanning January 2020 to April 2023 (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). However, the operation of CE318-T in polar environment is impeded by solar radiation and weather conditions, leading to a significant number of missing measurements. Consequently, we categorize daily observations with less than 20 measurements and the coefficient of dispersion (CV) exceeding 1 as invalid data, which are systematically eliminated from our analysis. Typically, these invalid data manifest with exceedingly high AOD values, often attributed to instrument downtime caused by factors such as precipitation or cloudy weather. Moreover, to ensure the accuracy of AOD measurement at Zhongshan Station, we refine our data by cross-referencing station operation records and the time series of black carbon (BC) concentrations. This process allows us to exclude AOD data associated with significant station activities and periods of elevated BC concentrations, thereby enhancing the reliability of our analysis. It should be noted that there are uncertainties in the AOD measurements of CE318-T during field observations due to atmospheric conditions, instrument noise, and calibration. It is estimated that during daytime measurements, the AOD uncertainty ranges from 0.010 to 0.021. For nighttime measurements, the AOD uncertainty depends on the calibration technique used. Specifically, when calibrated using the moon ratio technique, the uncertainty ranges from 0.011 to 0.019. With the application of the new sun ratio technique, the uncertainty for the 440 nm channel is between 0.012 and 0.015 (0.017), while for longer wavelengths, it ranges from 0.015 to 0.021. By employing the new sun–moon gain factor technique and using the Langley-calibrated instrument for calculation of the amplification between daytime and nighttime measurements, the uncertainty range is from 0.016 to 0.019 (Barreto et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e466">The meteorology data, including temperature, relative humidity, wind direction, and wind speed, were obtained from the Zhongshan Station meteorology observatory, with a temporal resolution of 1 h. BLH data were obtained from ERA5 reanalysis provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) with a temporal and spatial resolution of 1 h and 0.25 (latitude) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 (longitude).</p>
      <p id="d2e476">The Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model is a comprehensive model developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) to calculate and analyze the source, transport, and diffusion trajectories of atmospheric pollutants. The meteorological data used in the HYSPLIT model come from the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS). In this study, the HYSPLIT model is utilized to calculate the 168 h backward air mass trajectory from three altitudes of 50, 500, and 1000 m (a.m.s.l.) to Zhongshan Station.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Variation characteristics of AOD</title>
      <p id="d2e495">From January 2020 to March 2023, the monthly mean AOD values at various wavelengths varied from 0.00 to 0.20, with the lowest values in December 2020 and the highest values in August 2022 (Fig. 2a). The monthly mean AOD values at 500 nm (AOD<sub>500 nm</sub>) generally remained below 0.10, consistent with findings by Gadhavi and Achuthan (2004) at the Maitri Station, where AOD variation fell within the range of 0.01 to 0.10. The annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (standard deviation) values of the AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> were 0.074 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.090, 0.051 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.066, 0.071 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.117, and 0.053 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.031 in 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively (Table 1). Similarly, the annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD values of the AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> were 1.134 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.411, 0.953 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.338, 0.883 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.374, and 0.753 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.206 for the same years, respectively, suggesting that the aerosols over Zhongshan Station were mainly dominated by fine-mode particles in 2020 and coarse-mode particles in 2021, 2022, and 2023. The relationship between multi-year AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> illustrates that fine-mode particles are primarily concentrated in the range of AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, while high AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> values, which occur occasionally, are caused by coarse-mode particles (Fig. 2b). Although fine-mode particles have a longer suspension time in the atmosphere and can efficiently scatter and absorb sunlight, leading to lower AOD ranges, it is worth mentioning that in the coastal regions of Antarctica, the dominant role in AOD is sometimes played by coarse-mode particles. These particles, with larger radii and higher volume concentrations, originate mainly from abundant sea salt sources. Their presence results in increased scattering and absorption of sunlight, emphasizing the significance of coarse-mode particles in determining AOD levels in the Antarctic coastal areas (Su et al., 2022)</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e643"><bold>(a)</bold> Monthly variation in mean aerosol optical depth at different wavelengths measured over Zhongshan Station in Antarctica from 2020 to 2023. <bold>(b)</bold> Relationship between AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> over Zhongshan Station from 2020 to 2023.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/727/2025/acp-25-727-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e678">Annual mean and standard deviation of aerosol optical depth at different wavelengths and Ångström exponent at 440–870 nm at Zhongshan Station from 2020 to 2023.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2022</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2023</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD<sub>1640 nm</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.028 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.026 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.079</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.050 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.141</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.036</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD<sub>1020 nm</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.049 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.095</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.045 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.073</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.067 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.131</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.040 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.034</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD<sub>870 nm</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.047 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.093</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.039 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.070</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.060 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.126</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.037 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.032</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD<sub>675 nm</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.059 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.091</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.042 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.068</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.063 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.122</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.044 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.031</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD<sub>500 nm</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.074 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.090</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.051 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.066</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.071 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.117</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.053 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.031</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD<sub>440 nm</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.081 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.089</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.057 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.065</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.077 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.116</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.057 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.031</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD<sub>380 nm</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.089 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.091</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.063 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.065</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.077 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.117</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.061 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.032</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD<sub>340 nm</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.088 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.095</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.059 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.064</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.073 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.058 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.032</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.134 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.411</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.953 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.338</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.883 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.374</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.753 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.206</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Seasonal and monthly variations in AOD and Ångström exponent</title>
      <p id="d2e1216">The seasonal variation in AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> over Zhongshan Station suggests the median AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> values are lower in spring (0.033), summer (0.036), and autumn (0.045) but higher in winter (0.115), while the AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> values are 0.908, 1.010, 1.036, and 0.381, respectively (Fig. 4a). The frequency histograms show that the highest frequency range of AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> is 0.02 to 0.04 in spring, summer, and autumn, while it is 0.08 to 0.12 in winter (Fig. S2). The normal fitting curves of the frequency histograms of AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> indicate that the peak in winter is in the low-value range (0.3–0.4), while the peaks in spring, summer, and autumn are in the high-value range (1.0–1.2). To investigate the seasonal differences in AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub>, it is essential to understand the sources of air masses influencing aerosols at Zhongshan Station. Therefore, we calculate the 168 h backward trajectory once every 24 h from January 2020 to December 2022, with the starting height of 500 m and the starting time of 10:00 UTC (13:00 LT at Zhongshan Station), clustered by season (Fig. 3). We observed that the proportion of air masses originating from the surrounding waters (red clusters) and the ice edge margin of ice sheet (blue clusters) ranges from 50 % to 80 %, dominating throughout the year. These air masses are likely the primary sources of local or natural aerosols in Antarctica. In contrast, the proportion of distant origin (yellow and green clusters) is approximately 20 %, but it significantly increases in autumn, reaching around 45 %. These air masses are associated with long-range-transported aerosols. Therefore, the seasonal differences in AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> at Zhongshan Station are largely attributed to variations in the types and concentrations of local aerosols.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1312">Clusters of air mass backward trajectories in <bold>(a)</bold> spring, <bold>(b)</bold> summer, <bold>(c)</bold> autumn, and <bold>(d)</bold> winter at Zhongshan Station from 2020 to 2022.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/727/2025/acp-25-727-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1336"><bold>(a)</bold> Seasonal variation in aerosol optical depth at 500 nm and Ångström exponent at 440–870 nm over Zhongshan Station. For each monthly box, the central line indicates the median, and the bottom and top edges of the box indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. <bold>(b)</bold> Variations in monthly AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> at Zhongshan Station. For each monthly box, the central line indicates the median; the dot represents the mean; and the bottom and top edges of the box indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. <bold>(c)</bold> Monthly percentages of Ångström exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 (green) and Ångström exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 (blue) at Zhongshan Station from 2020 to 2023.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/727/2025/acp-25-727-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1386">The seasonal variations in AOD and AE are consistent with previous findings on sea salt aerosol concentrations, although the mechanism behind this seasonal variation is multifaceted. Huang et al. (2005)​​​​​​​ have indicated that higher winter wind speeds at Zhongshan Station can elevate marine source aerosol concentrations, primarily composed of sea salt, potentially explaining the winter peak in sea salt concentration (Hong et al., 2009). However, Hall and Wolff (1998) propose that the high sea salt load correlates more with moderate wind speeds and shifts in wind direction, rather than high wind speeds, with concentrated brine on freshly formed ice surfaces acting as a source of winter sea salt. Moreover, blowing snow over sea ice generates aerosols primarily made of sea salt, contributing to the winter peak in sea salt aerosols (Frey et al., 2020). In summer, lower sea salt concentrations lead to lower background levels of AOD, but the effect of enhanced marine biogenic emissions on AOD may increase. In the marine boundary layer over the eastern Southern Ocean sector, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nssSO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and MSA contribute approximately 40 % of the total mass of fine aerosols (particle size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) (Xu et al., 2021). Xu et al. (2019) reported the annual mean concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nssSO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and MSA at Zhongshan Station were 0–79 and 19–41 ng m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, with the maximum concentrations were observed in summer (Xu et al., 2019). This increase in summer concentrations is attributed to enhanced solar radiation; phytoplankton blooms in the polynyas releasing DMS (Zhang et al., 2015); and the DMS in the atmosphere being oxidized by radicals such as O<sub>3</sub> (significant at high latitudes), OH, and BrO in the gas phase (Boucher et al., 2003), resulting in elevated concentrations of MSA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nssSO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The positive correlation between mean surface chlorophyll and AOD in the Southern Ocean confirmed the contribution of DMS flux to aerosol load during summer (Gabric et al., 2005).</p>
      <p id="d2e1477">The monthly variations in AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> at Zhongshan Station suggest an opposite trend, with the mean values of AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> peaking in July and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> reaching its lowest in June (Fig. 4b). Median AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> values increase slightly from January to February, followed by a decrease in March and a continuous increase from March to August, reaching the maximum value, then gradually decreasing, and reaching the minimum in November and December. The percentages of AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 and AE<sub>440–8870 nm</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 represent the proportion of the monthly occurrence frequency of fine- and coarse-mode particles (Fig. 4c). The monthly mean and median AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> values are consistent with the proportion of coarse-mode particles (AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0), suggesting that the variation characteristics of AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> at Zhongshan Station are primarily influenced by coarse-mode particles. Given that Zhongshan Station is located in the coastal area of Antarctica, it is suspected that these coarse particles may be sea salt aerosols.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1595">Ångström exponent difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>440–675 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>675–870 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>440–870 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and AOD<sub>675 nm</sub> (color scale) during <bold>(a)</bold> spring, <bold>(b)</bold> summer, <bold>(c)</bold> autumn, and <bold>(d)</bold> winter at Zhongshan Station. The black lines indicate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of fine-mode aerosols, while the blue lines correspond to the fine-mode fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/727/2025/acp-25-727-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1679">Additionally, we used a graphical method proposed by Gobbi et al. (2007), which is based on Mie calculation and correlates the Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Ångström exponent spectral difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with fine-mode aerosol effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and fine-mode fraction to investigate the aerosol modification processes at Zhongshan Station in different seasons. Figure 5 presents a schematic diagram of the classification of aerosol types using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> functions of a dual-mode, lognormal distribution with the refractive index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a reference. It is known from the research of Jurányi and Weller (2019) that the refractive index of Antarctic coastal aerosol is about 1.4, so it seems reasonable to use this reference. We utilized AOD<sub>440 nm</sub>, AOD<sub>675 nm</sub>, and AOD<sub>870 nm</sub> to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>440–675 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>440–870 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>675–870 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then get the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>440–675 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>675–870 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The negative values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate the dominance of fine-mode aerosol, while positive values indicate the effect of two separate particle modes (Kaufman, 1993). The solid black line represents the size of fine-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the dashed blue line represents the proportion of the contribution of fine-mode particles to AOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). In Fig. 5, increasing AOD<sub>675 <italic>n</italic><italic>m</italic></sub> is associated with the declining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (spring and winter) and increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (summer and autumn). This indicates that higher aerosol loads in spring and winter are attributed to increased coarse-mode particle fractions, whereas in summer and autumn they are primarily associated with the increase in fine-mode particle size. Previous studies have indicated that sea salt dominates winter aerosols in the coastal areas of Antarctica (Hall and Wolff, 1998; Weller et al., 2008), and Xu et al. (2019) observed that the highest mean concentration of sea salt was in September at Zhongshan Station. This can explain that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are mainly positive in spring and winter, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is concentrated within the range of less than 50 % (Xu et al., 2019). In summer and autumn, apart from common sea salt aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50), the high AOD is mainly related to particle growth such as hygroscopic growth or condensation of fine-mode aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.10–0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m). This may be linked to the atmospheric oxidation of DMS emitted by biological sources in coastal regions or the aging process of aerosols originating from other sources, as the rate of new particle formation and particulate matter growth in summer is much greater than in winter in the Antarctica (Davison et al., 1996; Lachlan-Cope et al., 2020; Weller et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Relationship between AOD, Ångström exponent, and meteorological conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e1968">In this section, we analyze the diurnal variation characteristics of AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> during summer and explore their correlation with meteorological variables within the planetary boundary layer (PBL), such as wind directions and speeds, temperature, and relative humidity. We calculated the diurnal variations of AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> based on observations collected at Zhongshan Station during summer (December–February, 2020–2023), with each hourly mean containing at least 1000 individual observations (Fig. 6). The mean AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> exhibited an increase from 05:00 to 14:00 LT (local time of Zhongshan Station), reaching a maximum value (0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04), and then decreased. The mean AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> decreased from 05:00 to 12:00 LT, reaching the lowest value (0.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25), and then increased. These results indicate that the highest aerosol load occurs at 14:00 LT, accompanied by a larger aerosol particle size during this period. The diurnal variation in boundary layer height (BLH) is almost consistent with the variation in AOD<sub>500 nm</sub>, which is inconsistent with the general conclusion that the correlation between BLH and particulate matter concentration in the mid-latitudes is negative (Lou et al., 2019; Miao and Liu, 2019). However, a minor decline in BLH is noticeable when the AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> value reaches its peak at 14:00 LT. Consequently, we suspect that the weak absorption and low content of Antarctic aerosols typically do not suffice to form an “aerosol–boundary layer” positive feedback mechanism but may contribute to reducing the BLH when AOD is high (Lou et al., 2019; Petäjä et al., 2016).</p>

      <fig id="F6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2060">Diurnal variation in AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub> at Zhongshan Station. The black line indicates the mean of AOD<sub>500 nm</sub>, the red line represents the mean of AE<sub>440–870 nm</sub>, and the blue line represents the mean of BLH. The shadow represents the standard deviation of the mean.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/727/2025/acp-25-727-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2105">Moreover, the 2 min average wind direction at Zhongshan Station mainly comes from the southeast, with the diurnal variation in the 2 min average wind speeds ranging from 2 to 9 m s<sup>−1</sup>. There is a noticeable decline in wind speeds between 05:00 and 14:00 LT, followed by a gradual increase thereafter (Fig. 7). Given that the CE318-T is positioned westward of the main Zhongshan Station building, the eastward winds may carry emissions originating from western stations such as Zhongshan and Progress Station. The relationship between the diurnal variation in AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and wind speed is more obvious: AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> exhibits a decline (increase) concurrent with increasing (decreasing) wind speeds. This correlation stems from the fact that higher wind speeds facilitate the dispersion of pollutants, leading to a reduction in AOD, and vice versa (Coccia, 2021; Liu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022).</p>

      <fig id="F7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e2141">Diurnal variations of 2 min average wind direction, 2 min average speed, and AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> in summer at Zhongshan Station.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/727/2025/acp-25-727-2025-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e2161"><bold>(a)</bold> Diurnal variations of AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> (black), temperature (red), and relative humidity (blue) in summer at Zhongshan Station; <bold>(b)</bold> relationship between AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and temperature; and <bold>(c)</bold> relationship between AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> and relative humidity. The red line indicates the regression line obtained by fitting a linear regression, and the grey bands indicate the confidence intervals for the linear regression.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/727/2025/acp-25-727-2025-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2205">The influence of temperature and relative humidity on aerosol parameters is relatively complex. Temperature affects aerosol particle concentration by influencing the air convection and influencing the formation and optical properties of secondary by controlling chemical transformation (Han et al., 2007; Li et al., 2020). Relative humidity affects the chemical composition, size distribution, and optical properties of aerosol particles by affecting their aqueous-phase reactions and gas–particle partitioning (Altieri et al., 2008; Ding et al., 2021; Hennigan et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2013). The diurnal variations of AOD<sub>500 nm</sub>, temperature, and relative humidity in summer at Zhongshan Station show that AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> is positively correlated with temperature with a correlation coefficient of 0.22, and AOD<sub>500 nm</sub> is negatively correlated with relative humidity with a correlation coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.59 (Fig. 8). This indicates that rising (declining) temperature and declining (rising) relative humidity during the day may contribute to an increase (declining) in aerosol load. Previous studies have shown a positive correlation between temperature and AOD (Basharat et al., 2023). During the summer at Zhongshan Station, high temperatures may destroy the physical properties of bare rocks and promote the formation and diffusion of particulate matter, thereby increasing the aerosol load (Zhang, 2024). However, there is a study showing that higher temperatures may reduce methanesulfinic acid (MSIA) yield (Arsene et al., 1999). Therefore, the effect of temperature on the AOD at Zhongshan Station is complex, resulting in an insignificant positive correlation. The relationship between relative humidity and AOD is inconclusive (Gautam et al., 2022), as high relative humidity may contribute to the increase in aerosol hygroscopic properties, leading to an increase in AOD (Meng et al., 2024), or it may contribute to a decrease in AOD by reducing dust particles in the air (Zhang, 2024). Therefore, the influence of temperature and relative humidity on AOD may be related to the physicochemical properties of local aerosols and their sourcing and sink processes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Potential effects of aerosol sources on AOD levels</title>
      <p id="d2e2259">Besides meteorological conditions, aerosol sources may also influence the diurnal variation characteristics of AOD. We classified days with mean AOD below the 5th percentile as low-AOD day and those above the 95th percentile as high-AOD day (Fig. S3 and Table S1). Using the HYSPLIT backward trajectory model, we found that air masses on high-AOD days primarily originated from the ocean, whereas those on low-AOD days mostly came from the interior of Antarctica (Fig. S4). The altitudes of the backward trajectories show that during low-AOD days, the air mass originating from the ocean usually starts at a lower altitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 m), rises to a higher altitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 m), and then descends to Zhongshan Station (15 May and 25 December 2020), while the air mass originating from the interior of Antarctica usually starts at a higher altitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3000 m) and then descends to Zhongshan Station. This indicates that particles from the Antarctic Plateau or the free troposphere above the Antarctic interior are transported to Zhongshan Station by katabatic winds. Research studies show that the katabatic winds driven by latent cooling occurring in the high-wind East Antarctic can rush the dense air from the interior plateau to the coast (Simmons et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2020). Combined with the AE values, we find that the AE values of low-AOD days are usually greater than 1, indicating the small particle size; thus, we suspect that these fine particles may be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nssSO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Antarctic interior (Pei et al., 2021). In contrast, on high-AOD days, the air mass all originates in the ocean and usually starts at a lower altitude. The AE values corresponding to high-AOD moments on high-AOD days are extremely low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5), indicating that the particle size is large; thus, we suspect that these aerosols may consist of coarse sea salt particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Potential effects of aerosol particles on cloud and radiative forcing</title>
      <p id="d2e2316">The optical properties of aerosols play a crucial role in their impact on radiative forcing, cloud formation, and local climate. In our analysis of the variations in AOD and AE, we provided insights into the aerosol loading, particle sizes, and possible formation and growth mechanisms in the atmosphere over Zhongshan Station. During winter and spring, coarse-mode particles are predominantly derived from sea salt. Studies have shown that aerosols larger than 0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m in the marine boundary layer contain sea salt, contributing to most of the aerosol scattering and inducing cooling effects (Murphy et al., 1998). Additionally, the size and inhomogeneity of sea salt particles are often associated with relative humidity. Compared to remote oceans, the low relative humidity in coastal Antarctica may introduce more inhomogeneous sea salt particles, resulting in up to a 12 % change in direct radiative forcing due to inhomogeneity (Wang et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d2e2327">However, we are particularly interested in the behavior of aerosol particles during summer since solar radiation is limited in winter. In summer and autumn, the increase in fine-mode particles is closely related to the release of biogenic aerosols, such as DMS, emitted by phytoplankton in the marginal ice zone. When particles grow to a size suitable for cloud condensation nuclei or ice-nucleating particles, they can affect the formation of low-level mixed-phase clouds in coastal areas, contributing to the formation of low-level ice clouds. At the same time, the increased number density of cloud droplets enhances cloud reflectivity, resulting in negative radiative forcing (Satheesh and Krishna Moorthy, 2005). A recent study revealed that in the shallow mixed-phase clouds over Antarctica, the concentrations of cloud-relevant aerosol particles match the concentrations of ice crystals and cloud droplets (Radenz et al., 2024). The number of particles plays a crucial role in cloud growth. Increasing particle concentration results in a higher abundance of liquid droplets and ice crystals within clouds, which can impact cloud lifespan and potentially influence local weather and climate. Therefore, continuous monitoring of aerosol optical properties in coastal Antarctica is vital to improve our comprehension of aerosol radiative forcing variations caused by changes in aerosol loading and particle size.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary</title>
      <p id="d2e2339">This study analyzed the AOD and AE variations retrieved from CE318-T sun photometer data spanning January 2020 to April 2023 at Zhongshan Station in Antarctica. The main conclusions we draw are given here.</p>
      <p id="d2e2342">At Zhongshan Station, AOD varied from 0.00 to 0.20. Fine-mode particles were predominantly found in the lower AOD range, while higher AOD values were mainly attributed to coarse-mode particles. Seasonally, AOD exhibited a pattern of lower values in summer and higher values in winter, and the AE displayed an opposite trend. The increases in AOD during summer and autumn may be linked to particle growth, whereas the increases during spring and winter are associated with a decline in the fraction of fine-mode particles.</p>
      <p id="d2e2345">Low aerosol load over Zhongshan Station was not enough to form an “aerosol–boundary layer” positive feedback mechanism, but the slight decrease in BLH may be related to AOD diurnal peak at 14:00 LT. Moreover, high (low) wind speeds facilitated pollutant dispersion (accumulation), leading to reduced (increased) AOD. A weak positive correlation was noted between temperature and AOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40) and a negative correlation between relative humidity and AOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.59, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02). The mechanisms underlying temperature and humidity's influence on aerosols remain unclear, possibly linked to local aerosol properties at Zhongshan Station. In addition, we discuss the influence of aerosol sources on AOD. The backward trajectories show that the air masses on high-AOD days come from the ocean, and the low AE values indicate that the particle size is larger. We speculate that the main composition of the aerosols is sea salt. The air masses on the low-AOD days mainly come from the interior of Antarctica, and the high AE values indicate that the particle size is small. We speculate that the katabatic winds rush the air from the Antarctic Plateau to Zhongshan Station.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e2416">The data included in this study can be accessed via <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10983098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.10983098</ext-link> (Chen, 2024). Boundary layer height data can be downloaded from ECMWF ERA5 (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f17050d7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.f17050d7</ext-link>, Hersbach et al., 2023). Backward trajectory of air mass and the meteorological data are obtained from the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (<uri>https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT_traj.php</uri>, NOAA, 2024).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e2428">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-727-2025-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-727-2025-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e2437">The paper is a result of the lead author's research work under the supervision of MD, LZ, and YS. ZZ and YZ provided constructive comments. LZ participated in the offline discussion and made equal contributions in responding to the review comments and revising the manuscript. MD, QW, and BT provided experimental data. ZL provided aerial photos of Zhongshan Station. LC wrote the first draft of the paper with the help and support of all the authors. HC provided guidance for the manuscript revisions.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e2443">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e2449">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e2455">The authors thank the Institute of Global Change and Polar Meteorology of the Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences for providing aerosol optical measurements from Zhongshan Station. We would like to express our gratitude to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for providing the ERA5 boundary layer height data and to the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory for providing the HYSPLIT model, both of which have been instrumental in supporting our research.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e2460">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42122047), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2021YFC2802504), and the Basic Research Fund of the Chinese Academy of Meteorological Science (grant nos. 2023Z015 and 2023Z025).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e2467">This paper was edited by Duncan Watson-Parris and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Alghoul, M., Khamies, H., Assadeg, J., Yahya, M., Alfegi, E., and Sopian, K.: Impact of Aerosol Optical Depth on Solar Radiation Budget, in: Proceedings of the 3rd World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society, Int. Conference on renewable energy sources, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, 1–3 July 2009, 386–393, ISBN 978-960-474-093-2, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Arsene, C., Barnes, I., and Becker, K. H.: FT-IR product study of the photo-oxidation of dimethyl sulfide: Temperature and O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure dependence, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1, 5463–5470, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/A907211J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/A907211J</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S. P., Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Klein, G. C., and Marshall, A. G.: Oligomers formed through in-cloud methylglyoxal reactions: Chemical composition, properties, and mechanisms investigated by ultra-high resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry, Atmos. Environ., 42, 1476–1490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.015</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Barreto, Á., Cuevas, E., Granados-Muñoz, M.-J., Alados-Arboledas, L., Romero, P. M., Gröbner, J., Kouremeti, N., Almansa, A. F., Stone, T., Toledano, C., Román, R., Sorokin, M., Holben, B., Canini, M., and Yela, M.: The new sun-sky-lunar Cimel CE318-T multiband photometer – a comprehensive performance evaluation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 631–654, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-631-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-631-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Basharat, U., Tariq, S., Chaudhry, M. N., Khan, M., Bonah Agyekum, E., Fendzi Mbasso, W., and Kamel, S.: Seasonal correlation of aerosols with soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and vegetation over Pakistan using remote sensing, Heliyon, 9, e20635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20635" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20635</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Moulin, C., Belviso, S., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Cosme, E., von Kuhlmann, R., Lawrence, M. G., Pham, M., Reddy, M. S., Sciare, J., and Venkataraman, C.: DMS atmospheric concentrations and sulphate aerosol indirect radiative forcing: a sensitivity study to the DMS source representation and oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 49–65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-49-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-49-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Che, H., Xia, X., Zhao, H., Li, L., Gui, K., Zheng, Y., Song, J., Qi, B., Zhu, J., Miao, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Dubovik, O., Holben, B., Chen, H., Shi, G., and Zhang, X.: Aerosol optical and radiative properties and their environmental effects in China: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 248, 104634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104634</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chen, L.: Analysis of aerosol optical depth variation at Zhongshan Station in Antarctica, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10983098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.10983098</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Coccia, M.: How do low wind speeds and high levels of air pollution support the spread of COVID-19?, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 12, 437–445, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.10.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2020.10.002</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Davison, B., O'dowd, C., Hewitt, C. N., Smith, M. H., Harrison, R. M., Peel, D. A., Wolf, E., Mulvaney, R., Schwikowski, M., and Baltenspergert, U.: Dimethyl sulfide and its oxidation products in the atmosphere of the Atlantic and Southern Oceans, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1895–1906, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00428-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(95)00428-9</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Ding, J., Dai, Q., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Huangfu, Y., and Feng, Y.: Air humidity affects secondary aerosol formation in different pathways, Sci. Total Environ., 759, 143540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143540</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ding, M., Zou, X., Sun, Q., Yang, D., Zhang, W., Bian, L., Lu, C., Allison, I., Heil, P., and Xiao, C.: The PANDA automatic weather station network between the coast and Dome A, East Antarctica, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5019–5035, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5019-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-14-5019-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Frey, M. M., Norris, S. J., Brooks, I. M., Anderson, P. S., Nishimura, K., Yang, X., Jones, A. E., Nerentorp Mastromonaco, M. G., Jones, D. H., and Wolff, E. W.: First direct observation of sea salt aerosol production from blowing snow above sea ice, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2549–2578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2549-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2549-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gabric, A. J., Shephard, J. M., Knight, J. M., Jones, G., and Trevena, A. J.: Correlations between the satellite-derived seasonal cycles of phytoplankton biomass and aerosol optical depth in the Southern Ocean: Evidence for the influence of sea ice, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB4018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002546" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GB002546</ext-link>, 2005.​​​​​​​</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Gadhavi, H. and Achuthan, J.: Aerosol characteristics and aerosol radiative forcing over Maitri, Antarctica, Curr. Sci., 86, 296–304, 2004.​​​​​​​</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gautam, S., Elizabeth, J., Gautam, A. S., Singh, K., and Abhilash, P.: Impact Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth on Rainfall in Indian Rural Areas, Aerosol Science and Engineering, 6, 186–196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-022-00134-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s41810-022-00134-9</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gobbi, G. P., Kaufman, Y. J., Koren, I., and Eck, T. F.: Classification of aerosol properties derived from AERONET direct sun data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 453–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-453-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-453-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Hall, J. S. and Wolff, E. W.: Causes of seasonal and daily variations in aerosol sea-salt concentrations at a coastal Antarctic station, Atmos. Environ., 32, 3669–3677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00090-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00090-9</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Han, D., Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Lu, Y., Liu, J., and Zhao, N.: Influence of temperature and relative humidity upon aerosol mass concentrations vertical distributions, Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 24, 619–624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2007.5.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2007.5.011</ext-link>, 2007.​​​​​​​</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Harder, S., Warren, S. G., and Charlson, R. J.: Sulfate in air and snow at the South Pole: Implications for transport and deposition at sites with low snow accumulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 22825–22832, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900351</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Bergin, M. H., Dibb, J. E., and Weber, R. J.: Enhanced secondary organic aerosol formation due to water uptake by fine particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L18801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL035046</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1940 to present, Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f17050d7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.f17050d7</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> Hong, J., Chen, L., and Yang, X.: Characteristics of the aerosols in Zhongshan Station, Antarctica, Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 21, 1–14, 2009 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> Huang, Z., Ji, W., Yang, X., Huang, R., Tang, R., Yu, T., and Zhang, G.: The chemical composition of marine aerosol over Zhongshan Station in Antarctica and its sources discrimination in 1998, Acta Oceanol. Sin., 27, 59–66, 2005 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Jurányi, Z. and Weller, R.: One year of aerosol refractive index measurement from a coastal Antarctic site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14417–14430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14417-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-14417-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Kang, S., Zhang, Y., Qian, Y., and Wang, H.: A review of black carbon in snow and ice and its impact on the cryosphere, Earth-Sci. Rev., 210, 103346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103346</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kannemadugu, H. B. S., Sudhakaran Syamala, P., Taori, A., Bothale, R. V., and Chauhan, P.: Atmospheric aerosol optical properties and trends over Antarctica using in-situ measurements and MERRA-2 aerosol products, Polar Sci., 38, 101011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2023.101011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.polar.2023.101011</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kaufman, Y. J.: Aerosol optical thickness and atmospheric path radiance, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 2677–2692, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02427" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD02427</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Lachlan-Cope, T., Beddows, D. C. S., Brough, N., Jones, A. E., Harrison, R. M., Lupi, A., Yoon, Y. J., Virkkula, A., and Dall'Osto, M.: On the annual variability of Antarctic aerosol size distributions at Halley Research Station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4461–4476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4461-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4461-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Wang, W., Li, K., Zhang, W., Peng, C., Zhou, L., Shi, B., Chen, Y., Liu, M., Li, H., and Ge, M.: Temperature effects on optical properties and chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol derived from n-dodecane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8123–8137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8123-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-8123-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Carlson, B. E., Yung, Y. L., Lv, D., Hansen, J., Penner, J. E., Liao, H., Ramaswamy, V., Kahn, R. A., Zhang, P., Dubovik, O., Ding, A., Lacis, A. A., Zhang, L., and Dong, Y.: Scattering and absorbing aerosols in the climate system, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 3, 363–379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., and Lu, J.: Exploring the relationship between air pollution and meteorological conditions in China under environmental governance, Sci. Rep., 10, 14518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71338-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-71338-7</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lou, M., Guo, J., Wang, L., Xu, H., Chen, D., Miao, Y., Lv, Y., Li, Y., Guo, X., Ma, S., and Li, J.: On the Relationship Between Aerosol and Boundary Layer Height in Summer in China Under Different Thermodynamic Conditions, Earth Space Sci., 6, 887–901, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000620" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019EA000620</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Meng, H., Bai, G., and Wang, L.: Analysis of the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of AOD in typical industrial cities in northwest China and the influence of meteorological factors, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 15, 101957, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2023.101957</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Miao, Y. and Liu, S.: Linkages between aerosol pollution and planetary boundary layer structure in China, Sci. Total Environ., 650, 288–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.032</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Anderson, J. R., Quinn, P. K., McInnes, L. M., Brechtel, F. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Pósfai, M., Thomson, D. S., and Buseck, P. R.: Influence of sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in the Southern Ocean marine boundary layer, Nature, 392, 62–65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/32138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/32138</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>NOAA: HYSPLIT model, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, NOAA [code], <uri>https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT_traj.php</uri> (last access: 18 November 2024), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> Pant, V., Siingh, D., and Kamra, A. K.: Antarctic Aerosols and Climate: Measurements at a Coastal Antarctic Station, in: Climate Variability of Southern High Latitude Regions, CRC Press, ISBN 9781003203742, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Pei, Q., Saikawa, E., Kaspari, S., Widory, D., Zhao, C., Wu, G., Loewen, M., Wan, X., Kang, S., Wang, X., Zhang, Y.-L., and Cong, Z.: Sulfur aerosols in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Tibetan Plateau: Current knowledge and future perspectives, Earth-Sci. Rev., 220, 103753, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103753" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103753</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Petäjä, T., Järvi, L., Kerminen, V.-M., Ding, A. J., Sun, J. N., Nie, W., Kujansuu, J., Virkkula, A., Yang, X., Fu, C. B., Zilitinkevich, S., and Kulmala, M.: Enhanced air pollution via aerosol-boundary layer feedback in China, Sci. Rep., 6, 18998, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18998" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep18998</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Radenz, M., Engelmann, R., Henning, S., Schmithüsen, H., Baars, H., Frey, M. M., Weller, R., Bühl, J., Jimenez, C., Roschke, J., Muser, L. O., Wullenweber, N., Zeppenfeld, S., Griesche, H., Wandinger, U., and Seifert, P.: Ground-based Remote Sensing of Aerosol, Clouds, Dynamics, and Precipitation in Antarctica – First results from the one-year COALA campaign at Neumayer Station III in 2023, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 105, E1438–E1457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0285.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0285.1</ext-link>, 2024.​​​​​​​</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Satheesh, S. K. and Krishna Moorthy, K.: Radiative effects of natural aerosols: A review, Atmos. Environ., 39, 2089–2110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.029</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Angstrom exponent and bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D07207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006328</ext-link>, 2006.​​​​​​​</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Shaw, G. E.: Considerations on the origin and properties of the Antarctic aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 17, 1983–1998, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG017i008p01983" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/RG017i008p01983</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Simmons, J. B., Humphries, R. S., Wilson, S. R., Chambers, S. D., Williams, A. G., Griffiths, A. D., McRobert, I. M., Ward, J. P., Keywood, M. D., and Gribben, S.: Summer aerosol measurements over the East Antarctic seasonal ice zone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9497–9513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9497-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-9497-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Su, Y., Han, Y., Luo, H., Zhang, Y., Shao, S., and Xie, X.: Physical-Optical Properties of Marine Aerosols over the South China Sea: Shipboard Measurements and MERRA-2 Reanalysis, Remote Sens., 14, 2453, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs14102453</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., and Ge, X.: The impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution processes during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 927–934, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Thakur, R.: Trace elemental variability in aerosols near the two Indian Antarctic research stations during austral summer, in: Twenty Eighth Indian Antarctic Expedition 2008, Ministry of Earth Sciences, 61–74, ISBN 9789353212834, 2019.​​​​​​​</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Thornhill, G., Collins, W., Olivié, D., Skeie, R. B., Archibald, A., Bauer, S., Checa-Garcia, R., Fiedler, S., Folberth, G., Gjermundsen, A., Horowitz, L., Lamarque, J.-F., Michou, M., Mulcahy, J., Nabat, P., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Paulot, F., Schulz, M., Scott, C. E., Séférian, R., Smith, C., Takemura, T., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., and Weber, J.: Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1105–1126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Tian, B., Ding, M., Putero, D., Li, C., Zhang, D., Tang, J., Zheng, X., Bian, L., and Xiao, C.: Multi-year variation of near-surface ozone at Zhongshan Station, Antarctica, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 044003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac583c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ac583c</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Tomasi, C., Vitale, V., Lupi, A., Di Carmine, C., Campanelli, M., Herber, A., Treffeisen, R., Stone, R. S., Andrews, E., Sharma, S., Radionov, V., von Hoyningen-Huene, W., Stebel, K., Hansen, G. H., Myhre, C. L., Wehrli, C., Aaltonen, V., Lihavainen, H., Virkkula, A., Hillamo, R., Ström, J., Toledano, C., Cachorro, V. E., Ortiz, P., de Frutos, A. M., Blindheim, S., Frioud, M., Gausa, M., Zielinski, T., Petelski, T., and Yamanouchi, T.: Aerosols in polar regions: A historical overview based on optical depth and in situ observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D16205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008432" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008432</ext-link>, 2007.​​​​​​​</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Tomasi, C., Lupi, A., Mazzola, M., Stone, R. S., Dutton, E. G., Herber, A., Radionov, V. F., Holben, B. N., Sorokin, M. G., Sakerin, S. M., Terpugova, S. A., Sobolewski, P. S., Lanconelli, C., Petkov, B. H., Busetto, M., and Vitale, V.: An update on polar aerosol optical properties using POLAR-AOD and other measurements performed during the International Polar Year, Atmos. Environ., 52, 29–47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.055</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Udisti, R., Dayan, U., Becagli, S., Busetto, M., Frosini, D., Legrand, M., Lucarelli, F., Preunkert, S., Severi, M., Traversi, R., and Vitale, V.: Sea spray aerosol in central Antarctica. Present atmospheric behaviour and implications for paleoclimatic reconstructions, Atmos. Environ., 52, 109–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.018</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Virkkula, A., Grythe, H., Backman, J., Petäjä, T., Busetto, M., Lanconelli, C., Lupi, A., Becagli, S., Traversi, R., Severi, M., Vitale, V., Sheridan, P., and Andrews, E.: Aerosol optical properties calculated from size distributions, filter samples and absorption photometer data at Dome C, Antarctica, and their relationships with seasonal cycles of sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5033–5069, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5033-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-5033-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Michalski, G., Böhlke, J. K., Alexander, B., Savarino, J., and Thiemens, M. H.: Assessing the Seasonal Dynamics of Nitrate and Sulfate Aerosols at the South Pole Utilizing Stable Isotopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 8161–8177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD030517</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Chen, L., Guo, K., and Liu, B.: Spatio-temporal trajectory evolution and cause analysis of air pollution in Chengdu, China, J. Air Waste Manage., 72, 876–894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2022.2058642" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10962247.2022.2058642</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Bi, L., Yi, B., and Zhang, X.: How the Inhomogeneity of Wet Sea Salt Aerosols Affects Direct Radiative Forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 1805–1813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL081193</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Weller, R. and Lampert, A.: Optical properties and sulfate scattering efficiency of boundary layer aerosol at coastal Neumayer Station, Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D16208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009962</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Weller, R., Wöltjen, J., Piel, C., Resenberg, R., Wagenbach, D., König-Langlo, G., and Kriews, M.: Seasonal variability of crustal and marine trace elements in the aerosol at Neumayer station, Antarctica, Tellus B, 60, 742–752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00372.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00372.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Weller, R., Schmidt, K., Teinilä, K., and Hillamo, R.: Natural new particle formation at the coastal Antarctic site Neumayer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11399–11410, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11399-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11399-2015</ext-link>, 2015. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Xu, G., Chen, L., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., and Lin, Q.: Year-round records of bulk aerosol composition over the Zhongshan Station, Coastal East Antarctica, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 12, 271–288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0642-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11869-018-0642-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Xu, G., Chen, L., Xu, T., He, S., and Gao, Y.: Distributions of water-soluble ions in size-aggregated aerosols over the Southern Ocean and coastal Antarctica, Environ. Sci.-Proc. Imp., 23, 1316–1327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00089F" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D1EM00089F</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Yan, J., Jung, J., Lin, Q., Zhang, M., Xu, S., and Zhao, S.: Effect of sea ice retreat on marine aerosol emissions in the Southern Ocean, Antarctica, Sci. Total Environ., 745, 140773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140773" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140773</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y., Zhao, C., Wang, Q., Cong, Z., Yang, X., and Fan, H.: Aerosol characteristics at the three poles of the Earth as characterized by Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4849–4868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4849-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-4849-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Yu, L., Zhong, S., and Sun, B.: The Climatology and Trend of Surface Wind Speed over Antarctica and the Southern Ocean and the Implication to Wind Energy Application, Atmosphere, 11, 108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos11010108</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, F.: Factors Influencing the Spatio–Temporal Variability of Aerosol Optical Depth over the Arid Region of Northwest China, Atmosphere, 15, 54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15010054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos15010054</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, M., Chen, L., Xu, G., Lin, Q., and Liang, M.: Linking Phytoplankton Activity in Polynyas and Sulfur Aerosols over Zhongshan Station, East Antarctica, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 4629–4642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0094.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-15-0094.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Measurement report: Analysis of aerosol optical depth variation at Zhongshan Station in Antarctica</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alghoul, M., Khamies, H., Assadeg, J., Yahya, M., Alfegi, E., and Sopian, K.: Impact of Aerosol Optical Depth on Solar Radiation Budget, in: Proceedings of the 3rd World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society, Int. Conference on renewable energy sources, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, 1–3 July 2009, 386–393, ISBN 978-960-474-093-2, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arsene, C., Barnes, I., and Becker, K. H.: FT-IR product study of the
photo-oxidation of dimethyl sulfide: Temperature and O<sub>2</sub> partial pressure
dependence, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1, 5463–5470,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/A907211J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/A907211J</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S. P., Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Klein, G.
C., and Marshall, A. G.: Oligomers formed through in-cloud methylglyoxal
reactions: Chemical composition, properties, and mechanisms investigated by
ultra-high resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry, Atmos. Environ., 42,
1476–1490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.015</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barreto, Á., Cuevas, E., Granados-Muñoz, M.-J., Alados-Arboledas, L., Romero, P. M., Gröbner, J., Kouremeti, N., Almansa, A. F., Stone, T., Toledano, C., Román, R., Sorokin, M., Holben, B., Canini, M., and Yela, M.: The new sun-sky-lunar Cimel CE318-T multiband photometer – a comprehensive performance evaluation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 631–654, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-631-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-631-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Basharat, U., Tariq, S., Chaudhry, M. N., Khan, M., Bonah Agyekum, E.,
Fendzi Mbasso, W., and Kamel, S.: Seasonal correlation of aerosols with soil
moisture, evapotranspiration, and vegetation over Pakistan using remote
sensing, Heliyon, 9, e20635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20635" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20635</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boucher, O., Moulin, C., Belviso, S., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Cosme, E., von Kuhlmann, R., Lawrence, M. G., Pham, M., Reddy, M. S., Sciare, J., and Venkataraman, C.: DMS atmospheric concentrations and sulphate aerosol indirect radiative forcing: a sensitivity study to the DMS source representation and oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 49–65, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-49-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-49-2003</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Che, H., Xia, X., Zhao, H., Li, L., Gui, K., Zheng, Y., Song, J., Qi, B.,
Zhu, J., Miao, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Dubovik, O., Holben, B.,
Chen, H., Shi, G., and Zhang, X.: Aerosol optical and radiative properties
and their environmental effects in China: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev.,
248, 104634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104634</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, L.: Analysis of aerosol optical depth variation at Zhongshan Station
in Antarctica, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10983098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10983098</a>,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Coccia, M.: How do low wind speeds and high levels of air pollution support
the spread of COVID-19?, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 12, 437–445,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.10.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.10.002</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davison, B., O'dowd, C., Hewitt, C. N., Smith, M. H., Harrison, R. M., Peel,
D. A., Wolf, E., Mulvaney, R., Schwikowski, M., and Baltenspergert, U.:
Dimethyl sulfide and its oxidation products in the atmosphere of the
Atlantic and Southern Oceans, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1895–1906,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00428-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00428-9</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, J., Dai, Q., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Huangfu, Y., and Feng, Y.: Air
humidity affects secondary aerosol formation in different pathways, Sci. Total Environ., 759, 143540, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143540</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, M., Zou, X., Sun, Q., Yang, D., Zhang, W., Bian, L., Lu, C., Allison, I., Heil, P., and Xiao, C.: The PANDA automatic weather station network between the coast and Dome A, East Antarctica, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5019–5035, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5019-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5019-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frey, M. M., Norris, S. J., Brooks, I. M., Anderson, P. S., Nishimura, K., Yang, X., Jones, A. E., Nerentorp Mastromonaco, M. G., Jones, D. H., and Wolff, E. W.: First direct observation of sea salt aerosol production from blowing snow above sea ice, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2549–2578, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2549-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2549-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gabric, A. J., Shephard, J. M., Knight, J. M., Jones, G., and Trevena, A.
J.: Correlations between the satellite-derived seasonal cycles of
phytoplankton biomass and aerosol optical depth in the Southern Ocean:
Evidence for the influence of sea ice, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB4018,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002546" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002546</a>, 2005.​​​​​​​

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gadhavi, H. and Achuthan, J.: Aerosol characteristics and aerosol radiative
forcing over Maitri, Antarctica, Curr. Sci., 86, 296–304, 2004.​​​​​​​

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gautam, S., Elizabeth, J., Gautam, A. S., Singh, K., and Abhilash, P.:
Impact Assessment of Aerosol Optical Depth on Rainfall in Indian Rural
Areas, Aerosol Science and Engineering, 6, 186–196,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-022-00134-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-022-00134-9</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gobbi, G. P., Kaufman, Y. J., Koren, I., and Eck, T. F.: Classification of aerosol properties derived from AERONET direct sun data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 453–458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-453-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-453-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hall, J. S. and Wolff, E. W.: Causes of seasonal and daily variations in
aerosol sea-salt concentrations at a coastal Antarctic station, Atmos. Environ., 32, 3669–3677, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00090-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00090-9</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, D., Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Lu, Y., Liu, J., and Zhao, N.: Influence of
temperature and relative humidity upon aerosol mass concentrations vertical
distributions, Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 24,
619–624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2007.5.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2007.5.011</a>, 2007.​​​​​​​

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harder, S., Warren, S. G., and Charlson, R. J.: Sulfate in air and snow at
the South Pole: Implications for transport and deposition at sites with low
snow accumulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 22825–22832, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900351</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hennigan, C. J., Bergin, M. H., Dibb, J. E., and Weber, R. J.: Enhanced
secondary organic aerosol formation due to water uptake by fine particles,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L18801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035046</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1940 to present, Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f17050d7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f17050d7</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hong, J., Chen, L., and Yang, X.: Characteristics of the aerosols in
Zhongshan Station, Antarctica, Chinese Journal of Polar
Research, 21, 1–14, 2009 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, Z., Ji, W., Yang, X., Huang, R., Tang, R., Yu, T., and Zhang, G.: The
chemical composition of marine aerosol over Zhongshan Station in Antarctica
and its sources discrimination in 1998, Acta Oceanol. Sin., 27, 59–66, 2005 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jurányi, Z. and Weller, R.: One year of aerosol refractive index measurement from a coastal Antarctic site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14417–14430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14417-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14417-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kang, S., Zhang, Y., Qian, Y., and Wang, H.: A review of black carbon in
snow and ice and its impact on the cryosphere, Earth-Sci. Rev., 210,
103346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103346</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kannemadugu, H. B. S., Sudhakaran Syamala, P., Taori, A., Bothale, R. V.,
and Chauhan, P.: Atmospheric aerosol optical properties and trends over
Antarctica using in-situ measurements and MERRA-2 aerosol products, Polar
Sci., 38, 101011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2023.101011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2023.101011</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaufman, Y. J.: Aerosol optical thickness and atmospheric path radiance,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 2677–2692, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02427" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02427</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lachlan-Cope, T., Beddows, D. C. S., Brough, N., Jones, A. E., Harrison, R. M., Lupi, A., Yoon, Y. J., Virkkula, A., and Dall'Osto, M.: On the annual variability of Antarctic aerosol size distributions at Halley Research Station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4461–4476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4461-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4461-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Wang, W., Li, K., Zhang, W., Peng, C., Zhou, L., Shi, B., Chen, Y., Liu, M., Li, H., and Ge, M.: Temperature effects on optical properties and chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol derived from n-dodecane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8123–8137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8123-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8123-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Carlson, B. E., Yung, Y. L., Lv, D., Hansen, J., Penner, J. E.,
Liao, H., Ramaswamy, V., Kahn, R. A., Zhang, P., Dubovik, O., Ding, A.,
Lacis, A. A., Zhang, L., and Dong, Y.: Scattering and absorbing aerosols in
the climate system, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 3, 363–379,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., and Lu, J.: Exploring the relationship between air
pollution and meteorological conditions in China under environmental
governance, Sci. Rep., 10, 14518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71338-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71338-7</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lou, M., Guo, J., Wang, L., Xu, H., Chen, D., Miao, Y., Lv, Y., Li, Y., Guo,
X., Ma, S., and Li, J.: On the Relationship Between Aerosol and Boundary
Layer Height in Summer in China Under Different Thermodynamic Conditions,
Earth Space Sci., 6, 887–901, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000620" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000620</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meng, H., Bai, G., and Wang, L.: Analysis of the spatial and temporal
distribution characteristics of AOD in typical industrial cities in
northwest China and the influence of meteorological factors, Atmos.
Pollut. Res., 15, 101957, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101957" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101957</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miao, Y. and Liu, S.: Linkages between aerosol pollution and planetary
boundary layer structure in China, Sci. Total Environ., 650,
288–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.032</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murphy, D. M., Anderson, J. R., Quinn, P. K., McInnes, L. M., Brechtel, F.
J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Pósfai, M., Thomson, D. S.,
and Buseck, P. R.: Influence of sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in
the Southern Ocean marine boundary layer, Nature, 392, 62–65,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/32138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/32138</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
NOAA: HYSPLIT model, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, NOAA [code], <a href="https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT_traj.php" target="_blank"/> (last access: 18 November 2024), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pant, V., Siingh, D., and Kamra, A. K.: Antarctic Aerosols and Climate: Measurements at a Coastal Antarctic Station, in: Climate Variability of Southern High Latitude Regions, CRC Press, ISBN 9781003203742, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pei, Q., Saikawa, E., Kaspari, S., Widory, D., Zhao, C., Wu, G., Loewen, M.,
Wan, X., Kang, S., Wang, X., Zhang, Y.-L., and Cong, Z.: Sulfur aerosols in
the Arctic, Antarctic, and Tibetan Plateau: Current knowledge and future
perspectives, Earth-Sci. Rev., 220, 103753,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103753" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103753</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petäjä, T., Järvi, L., Kerminen, V.-M., Ding, A. J., Sun, J. N.,
Nie, W., Kujansuu, J., Virkkula, A., Yang, X., Fu, C. B., Zilitinkevich, S.,
and Kulmala, M.: Enhanced air pollution via aerosol-boundary layer feedback
in China, Sci. Rep., 6, 18998, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18998" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18998</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Radenz, M., Engelmann, R., Henning, S., Schmithüsen, H., Baars, H.,
Frey, M. M., Weller, R., Bühl, J., Jimenez, C., Roschke, J., Muser, L.
O., Wullenweber, N., Zeppenfeld, S., Griesche, H., Wandinger, U., and
Seifert, P.: Ground-based Remote Sensing of Aerosol, Clouds, Dynamics, and
Precipitation in Antarctica – First results from the one-year COALA
campaign at Neumayer Station III in 2023, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 105, E1438–E1457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0285.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0285.1</a>, 2024.​​​​​​​

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Satheesh, S. K. and Krishna Moorthy, K.: Radiative effects of natural
aerosols: A review, Atmos. Environ., 39, 2089–2110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.029</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Angstrom exponent and
bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D07207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328</a>, 2006.​​​​​​​

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shaw, G. E.: Considerations on the origin and properties of the Antarctic
aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 17, 1983–1998, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG017i008p01983" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/RG017i008p01983</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simmons, J. B., Humphries, R. S., Wilson, S. R., Chambers, S. D., Williams, A. G., Griffiths, A. D., McRobert, I. M., Ward, J. P., Keywood, M. D., and Gribben, S.: Summer aerosol measurements over the East Antarctic seasonal ice zone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9497–9513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9497-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9497-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, Y., Han, Y., Luo, H., Zhang, Y., Shao, S., and Xie, X.: Physical-Optical
Properties of Marine Aerosols over the South China Sea: Shipboard
Measurements and MERRA-2 Reanalysis, Remote Sens., 14, 2453,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102453</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., and Ge, X.: The
impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution processes
during wintertime in Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 927–934,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.019</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thakur, R.: Trace elemental variability in aerosols near the two Indian
Antarctic research stations during austral summer, in: Twenty Eighth Indian Antarctic Expedition 2008, Ministry of Earth Sciences, 61–74, ISBN 9789353212834, 2019.​​​​​​​

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thornhill, G., Collins, W., Olivié, D., Skeie, R. B., Archibald, A., Bauer, S., Checa-Garcia, R., Fiedler, S., Folberth, G., Gjermundsen, A., Horowitz, L., Lamarque, J.-F., Michou, M., Mulcahy, J., Nabat, P., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Paulot, F., Schulz, M., Scott, C. E., Séférian, R., Smith, C., Takemura, T., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., and Weber, J.: Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1105–1126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tian, B., Ding, M., Putero, D., Li, C., Zhang, D., Tang, J., Zheng, X.,
Bian, L., and Xiao, C.: Multi-year variation of near-surface ozone at
Zhongshan Station, Antarctica, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 044003,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac583c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac583c</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tomasi, C., Vitale, V., Lupi, A., Di Carmine, C., Campanelli, M., Herber,
A., Treffeisen, R., Stone, R. S., Andrews, E., Sharma, S., Radionov, V., von
Hoyningen-Huene, W., Stebel, K., Hansen, G. H., Myhre, C. L., Wehrli, C.,
Aaltonen, V., Lihavainen, H., Virkkula, A., Hillamo, R., Ström, J.,
Toledano, C., Cachorro, V. E., Ortiz, P., de Frutos, A. M., Blindheim, S.,
Frioud, M., Gausa, M., Zielinski, T., Petelski, T., and Yamanouchi, T.:
Aerosols in polar regions: A historical overview based on optical depth and
in situ observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D16205,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008432" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008432</a>, 2007.​​​​​​​

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tomasi, C., Lupi, A., Mazzola, M., Stone, R. S., Dutton, E. G., Herber, A.,
Radionov, V. F., Holben, B. N., Sorokin, M. G., Sakerin, S. M., Terpugova,
S. A., Sobolewski, P. S., Lanconelli, C., Petkov, B. H., Busetto, M., and
Vitale, V.: An update on polar aerosol optical properties using POLAR-AOD
and other measurements performed during the International Polar Year,
Atmos. Environ., 52, 29–47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.055</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Udisti, R., Dayan, U., Becagli, S., Busetto, M., Frosini, D., Legrand, M.,
Lucarelli, F., Preunkert, S., Severi, M., Traversi, R., and Vitale, V.: Sea
spray aerosol in central Antarctica. Present atmospheric behaviour and
implications for paleoclimatic reconstructions, Atmos. Environ., 52,
109–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.018</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Virkkula, A., Grythe, H., Backman, J., Petäjä, T., Busetto, M., Lanconelli, C., Lupi, A., Becagli, S., Traversi, R., Severi, M., Vitale, V., Sheridan, P., and Andrews, E.: Aerosol optical properties calculated from size distributions, filter samples and absorption photometer data at Dome C, Antarctica, and their relationships with seasonal cycles of sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5033–5069, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5033-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5033-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walters, W. W., Michalski, G., Böhlke, J. K., Alexander, B., Savarino,
J., and Thiemens, M. H.: Assessing the Seasonal Dynamics of Nitrate and
Sulfate Aerosols at the South Pole Utilizing Stable Isotopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 8161–8177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030517" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030517</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, X., Chen, L., Guo, K., and Liu, B.: Spatio-temporal trajectory
evolution and cause analysis of air pollution in Chengdu, China, J. Air Waste Manage., 72, 876–894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2022.2058642" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2022.2058642</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Z., Bi, L., Yi, B., and Zhang, X.: How the Inhomogeneity of Wet Sea
Salt Aerosols Affects Direct Radiative Forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 1805–1813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081193</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weller, R. and Lampert, A.: Optical properties and sulfate scattering
efficiency of boundary layer aerosol at coastal Neumayer Station,
Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D16208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009962</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weller, R., Wöltjen, J., Piel, C., Resenberg, R., Wagenbach, D.,
König-Langlo, G., and Kriews, M.: Seasonal variability of crustal and
marine trace elements in the aerosol at Neumayer station, Antarctica, Tellus
B, 60, 742–752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00372.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00372.x</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weller, R., Schmidt, K., Teinilä, K., and Hillamo, R.: Natural new particle formation at the coastal Antarctic site Neumayer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11399–11410, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11399-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11399-2015</a>, 2015.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, G., Chen, L., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., and Lin, Q.: Year-round
records of bulk aerosol composition over the Zhongshan Station, Coastal East
Antarctica, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 12, 271–288,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0642-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0642-9</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, G., Chen, L., Xu, T., He, S., and Gao, Y.: Distributions of
water-soluble ions in size-aggregated aerosols over the Southern Ocean and
coastal Antarctica, Environ. Sci.-Proc. Imp., 23, 1316–1327,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00089F" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00089F</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yan, J., Jung, J., Lin, Q., Zhang, M., Xu, S., and Zhao, S.: Effect of sea
ice retreat on marine aerosol emissions in the Southern Ocean, Antarctica,
Sci. Total Environ., 745, 140773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140773" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140773</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Y., Zhao, C., Wang, Q., Cong, Z., Yang, X., and Fan, H.: Aerosol characteristics at the three poles of the Earth as characterized by Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4849–4868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4849-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4849-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, L., Zhong, S., and Sun, B.: The Climatology and Trend of Surface Wind
Speed over Antarctica and the Southern Ocean and the Implication to Wind
Energy Application, Atmosphere, 11, 108,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010108</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, F.: Factors Influencing the Spatio–Temporal Variability of Aerosol
Optical Depth over the Arid Region of Northwest China, Atmosphere, 15, 54,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15010054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15010054</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, M., Chen, L., Xu, G., Lin, Q., and Liang, M.: Linking Phytoplankton
Activity in Polynyas and Sulfur Aerosols over Zhongshan Station, East
Antarctica, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 4629–4642,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0094.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0094.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
