<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-25-4719-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>A comprehensive global modeling assessment of nitrate heterogeneous formation on desert dust</article-title><alt-title>A comprehensive global modeling assessment</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Soussé Villa</surname><given-names>Rubén</given-names></name>
          <email>ruben.sousse@bsc.es</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3345-4562</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jorba</surname><given-names>Oriol</given-names></name>
          <email>oriol.jorba@bsc.es</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5872-0244</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Gonçalves Ageitos</surname><given-names>María</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-6403</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bowdalo</surname><given-names>Dene</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2434-2892</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Guevara</surname><given-names>Marc</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9727-8583</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Pérez García-Pando</surname><given-names>Carlos</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-0697</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Projects and Construction Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Terrassa, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Rubén Soussé Villa (ruben.sousse@bsc.es) and Oriol Jorba (oriol.jorba@bsc.es)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>May</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>4719</fpage><lpage>4753</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>July</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>September</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>January</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Rubén Soussé Villa et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e142">Desert dust undergoes complex heterogeneous chemical reactions during atmospheric transport, forming nitrate coatings that influence hygroscopicity, gas partitioning, optical properties, and aerosol radiative forcing. Contemporary atmospheric chemistry models show significant disparities in aerosol nitrogen species due to varying parameterizations and inaccuracies in representing heterogeneous chemistry and dust alkalinity. This study investigates key processes in nitrate formation in the presence of dust and evaluates their representation in models. We incorporate varying levels of dust heterogeneous chemistry complexity into the Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry (MONARCH)  model, assessing sensitivity to critical processes. Our analyses address the condensation pathways of gas species onto dust (irreversible and reversible); the influence of nitrate representation on species burdens, lifetimes, and size distribution; and the role of alkalinity. Using annual global simulations, we compare particulate and gas species surface concentrations to observations and evaluate global budgets and spatial distributions. Findings show significant outcome dependence on methodology, particularly on reversible vs. irreversible gas condensation on dust, with wide ranges for particulate nitrate burdens (0.66 to 1.93 Tg) and correlations with observations (0.66 to 0.91). In contrast, particulate ammonium burdens show lower variability (0.19 to 0.31 Tg). Incorporating dust (together with sea-salt) alkalinity improves consistency with observations, with reversible condensation along with alkalinity representation yielding the best agreement, while showing consistent gas and particle partitioning. In contrast, irreversible uptake reactions overestimate coarse particulate nitrate formation. Our findings offer guidelines for integrating nitrate heterogeneous formation on dust in models, paving the road for improved estimates of aerosol radiative effects.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Generalitat de Catalunya</funding-source>
<award-id>2023 FI-3 00065</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>European Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>FRAGMENT (773051)</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>AXA Research Fund</funding-source>
<award-id>AXA Chair on Sand and Dust Storms at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad</funding-source>
<award-id>HEAVY (PID2022-140365OB-I)</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>European Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>FORCeS (821205)</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e154">Desert dust is produced by wind erosion of arid and semi-arid surfaces, contributing approximately 40 % of the total dry aerosol mass globally and between 70 % and 80 % if sea-salt aerosol (SS) is not considered <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.1"/>. Dust interacts with shortwave and longwave radiation, affects cloud formation, and alters atmospheric composition, modifying the Earth’s energy and water cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.2"/>. When deposited, dust also affects the biogeochemical cycles of the ocean and continental areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.3"/>. If inhaled, dust can be potentially harmful for animal and human health <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124" id="paren.4"/>. Temporal variations in dust emissions, from interannual to geological timescales, have been a key driver of the past climate of the Earth, as observed in ice cores and ocean sediment samples <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.5"/>. All these considerations make desert dust particles a key component of the Earth system that influence climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="paren.6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e176">Climate perturbations by dust depend fundamentally upon the dust particles’ physical and chemical properties. These properties are mainly the particle size distribution (PSD), shape, surface characteristics, mineral composition, and mixing state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx102" id="paren.7"/>. These characteristics depend on the dust source region and on its chemical transformations while transported in the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.8"/>. These two factors determine the final dust optical properties and consequently its radiative forcing.</p>
      <p id="d2e185">A particularly significant factor driving the chemical evolution of dust in the atmosphere is <italic>heterogeneous chemistry</italic>: chemical reactions involving more than one phase of matter (e.g., gas, liquid, and solid particles) that might occur on the surfaces of aerosol particles or within their liquid phases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx102" id="paren.9"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e194">For example, the condensation of atmospheric gas species on liquid or solid particles is key to particle growth and changes in optical properties during atmospheric transport <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx127 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.10"/>. Heterogeneous reactions involving nitrogen, for example, can even cause dust to act as a transport medium for nitrates from nitrate-rich areas to regions downwind of dust sources <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e204">Heterogeneous reactions mainly occur when dust mixes with anthropogenic pollutants emitted in urban and industrial areas. Nitric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ammonia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), sulfur dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are the most important anthropogenic species that react with dust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx136" id="paren.12"/>. These interactions lead to (1) the formation of aqueous coatings around the particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.13"/> and (2) the reaction of gases with the nonvolatile cations (NVCs) present at the particles' surfaces and dissolved in their liquid envelopes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.14"/>. These processes transfer mass from the gas to the aerosol phase, through either irreversible reactions of low-volatility gas vapors with the bulk material of the particle or reversible condensation–evaporation processes between the gas phase and the liquid coating <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx123 bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.15"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e297">Each gas species' chemical transformation follows a distinct pathway depending on its solubility and reactivity with other atmospheric species dissolved in the particle's liquid coating and with the NVCs in dust. Among these, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a major role in dust heterogeneous chemistry due to its relatively high solubility and reactivity with ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to the formation of ammonium nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx124" id="paren.16"/>. Aqueous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also paramount, competing with dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to neutralize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the neutralization by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> predominates due to its very low vapor pressure, preventing its evaporation back to the gas phase and resulting in the formation of ammonium sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx122" id="paren.17"/>. These are the main formation pathways of particulate nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), particulate ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and particulate sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> neutralization system in the particles' liquid coating. Additionally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is relevant in the aqueous medium as it converts to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through oxidation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx123" id="paren.18"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e625">The dust minerals also provide additional reactive surfaces to neutralize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with their reactivity depending on their solubility and the environmental relative humidity (RH). Under low RH, solid minerals may serve as the active sites for reactions with gas species on the particle surfaces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124" id="paren.19"/>. Conversely, at high RH, minerals can dissociate in the aqueous medium, releasing NVCs such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The active sites in dust minerals and NVCs play a key role in neutralizing dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and forming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compounds (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">KNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.20"/>. Consequently, these nitrate salts may form on the surface of the dust under low RH or dissociate in the particle's liquid coating <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.21"/>. These reactions represent the primary pathways for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in the presence of dust and are highly sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sulfate concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx101" id="paren.22"/>. For instance, the combination of reduced sulfate emissions along with unchanged or even enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, as predicted by 21st century emission scenarios, implies a reduction in particle acidity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.23"/>. This scenario, alongside a potential rise in dust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx123 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.24"/>, would lead to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, especially in the fine mode, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are not concurrently reduced <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx139" id="paren.25"/>. Therefore, accurate modeling of dust heterogeneous chemistry in atmospheric models is important for present and future air quality control <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.26"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e911">In recent decades, several approximations have been introduced in atmospheric chemistry models to address nitrate heterogeneous reactions on both dust and SS, with a particular focus on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> condensation. These approaches range from dynamic mass transfer (DMT) calculations between gas and aerosol phases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85 bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx110 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx138 bib1.bibx121" id="paren.27"/> to the assumption that the bulk gas–aerosol phases instantly reach thermodynamic equilibrium (TEQ), with the calculation of their correspondent concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.28"/>. While DMT can accurately capture processes far from TEQ (e.g., the condensation of gas species at low temperatures, under extreme RH conditions, or onto coarse particles), the inherent stiffness of inorganic heterogeneous chemistry renders DMT a rigorous but computationally expensive methodology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="altparen.29"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx138" id="altparen.30"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="altparen.31"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="altparen.32"/>). On the other hand, assuming instantaneous TEQ is more efficient and has gained popularity despite its tendency to overestimate coarse nitrate formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.33"/>. To balance accuracy and computational cost, several intermediate strategies have been developed, including (1) simplifying the DMT equations to a first-order irreversible uptake reaction (UPTK), which ignores the evaporation back to the gas phase of those species taken up in the aerosol phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.34"/>, (2) the double call of the TEQ concentration calculation for both the fine (diameter up to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and coarse (diameter above 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) modes of dust and SS (double-call method, DBCLL) after either kinetically limiting the gas condensing in each bin or mode <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="paren.35"/> or redistributing the condensed mass from the bulk TEQ using kinetic coefficients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.36"/>, and (3) employing an hybrid approach (HYB) that applies TEQ to the fine bins or modes and UPTK to the coarse ones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx121" id="paren.37"/>. Overall, methods involving DMT or TEQ calculations allow us to simulate the reversible heterogeneous reactions (condensation–evaporation dynamics), and the UPTK calculates the irreversible uptake of gas species, accounting for gas specifications, particle alkalinity, and environmental RH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.38"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e986">Despite these efforts to incorporate nitrate heterogeneous reactions on coarse particles, atmospheric models still significantly diverge in their predictions of the tropospheric burden of oxidized (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and reduced (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) nitrogen, often struggling to reproduce the observational data of these species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx137 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.39"/>. For instance, the particulate nitrate AeroCom phase III experiment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.40"/>, an extensive intercomparison study of atmospheric models incorporating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation processes on dust and SS, highlights substantial disagreements. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atmospheric burden among the models is 0.63 Tg, with a standard deviation of 0.56 Tg, nearly 90 % of the mean value. Similar variability is observed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Tg). The study also highlights the general inaccuracy of current models in reproducing observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations after long-range transport of precursor species, indicating that nitrogen heterogeneous chemistry processes on dust and SS are often misrepresented in models.</p>
      <p id="d2e1118">The scope of the present work is to understand the role of dust in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation through a systematic investigation of the underlying processes governing dust heterogeneous chemistry. To achieve this goal, we incorporate a variety of mechanisms of different complexities into a global model. This enables a comprehensive analysis of the partitioning between gas and aerosol phases, the suitability of irreversible and reversible parameterizations for the condensation of gas species on dust, and the role of explicit representation of alkalinity. While our primary emphasis is on the heterogeneous chemistry on dust surfaces, we also account for nitrate formation on SS and its alkalinity.</p>
      <p id="d2e1135">This paper is structured as follows. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> introduces the Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry (MONARCH) model (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>), detailing the specific developments implemented for this study (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>), the setup of the simulations conducted (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>), and the datasets used for evaluation (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>). Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> presents an analysis of the global simulations and their evaluation against observational data. This section includes a comparison of the spatial distributions and an examination of the total nitrogen burden and gas/particle partitioning. Additionally, we discuss the budgets of reduced and oxidized nitrogen species, depositions, production/loss rates, and lifetimes. Our results are contextualized with findings from previous studies, providing a comprehensive understanding of the results. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> provides a summary of our key findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>The MONARCH model</title>
      <p id="d2e1168">MONARCH is an atmospheric chemistry model developed by the Earth Sciences department of the Barcelona Supercomputing Center <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx90" id="paren.41"/>. It simulates the atmospheric life cycle of aerosol- and gas-phase species through an online coupling with the Nonhydrostatic Multiscale Model on the B grid (NMMB) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.42"/>. NMMB allows us to run both global and regional atmospheric simulations with embedded telescoping nests. The Arakawa B grid is used in the horizontal direction and the Lorenz hybrid pressure–sigma coordinate in the vertical direction. MONARCH global simulations use a regular latitude–longitude grid with polar filtering, and a rotated longitude–latitude grid is adopted for regional applications. The NMMB numerical schemes are based on principles described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.43"/>. The physical parameterizations used in the model include (1) a surface layer scheme based on the Monin–Obukhov similarity theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.44"/> combined with a viscous sublayer on continental and water surfaces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx141 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.45"/>, (2) the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ) planetary boundary layer and the free-troposphere turbulence scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.46"/>, (3) the unified NCEP–NCAR–AFWA Noah land surface model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.47"/> to compute the surface heat and moisture fluxes, (4) the 1D Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for Global circulation Models (RRTMG) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.48"/> for the calculation of shortwave and longwave radiative fluxes, (5) the Ferrier microphysics scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.49"/> for grid-scale clouds, and (6) the Betts–Miller–Janjic convective cloud scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.50"/>. The same advection and vertical mixing schemes formulated in NMMB are used for both meteorological and chemistry species for consistency.</p>
      <p id="d2e1202">MONARCH includes a gas-phase module combined with a hybrid sectional–bulk multicomponent mass-based aerosol module. The gas-phase chemistry is based on the Carbon Bond 2005 (CB05) chemical mechanism extended with chlorine chemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx134 bib1.bibx132" id="paren.51"/>, designed to describe urban-to-remote tropospheric conditions. The photolysis rates are computed using the Fast-J scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx133" id="paren.52"/> accounting for aerosols, clouds, and absorbers such as ozone. A resistance approach is adopted for dry deposition  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx130" id="paren.53"/>, and in-cloud scavenging, below-cloud scavenging, and wet deposition follow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.54"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.55"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1220">The aerosol representation in MONARCH considers eight main components, namely dust, SS, black carbon, organic matter (both primary and secondary), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and non-speciated aerosol mass. Mineral dust and SS are described with a sectional size distribution of eight bins, with diameters spanning 0.2–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m for dust and 0.2–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m for SS. All the other aerosol components are represented by a fine mode, except <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is represented by both fine and coarse modes to consider the condensation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coarse particles. Table S2 in the Supplement reports the bin volumetric and effective radii, density, and their fractional contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1335">Black carbon is represented in two primary modes: hydrophobic and hydrophilic, with 80 % of its emitted mass initially classified as hydrophobic. During atmospheric transport, an aging process with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding time of 1.2 d facilitates the transition of mass from the hydrophobic to the hydrophilic mode <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.56"/>. Organic aerosols are represented using the simplified scheme of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92" id="text.57"/>, which assumes fixed secondary organic aerosol (SOA) yields calibrated to align with more complex volatility-based approaches. For primary organic aerosols, a dual-mode representation – hydrophobic and hydrophilic – is adopted, similar to black carbon. In this scheme, 50 % of the emitted mass is classified as hydrophobic, with an aging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding time of 1.15 d transitioning it to the hydrophilic mode. Originally designed for global models, this approach has also demonstrated strong performance at regional scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.58"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1362">A simplified gas–aqueous–aerosol mechanism accounts for sulfur chemistry through the oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and dimethyl sulfide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the end of each chemistry integration time step, the remaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that has not formed aqueous sulfate is assumed to fully nucleate into fine particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="paren.59"/>. The heterogeneous hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on aqueous sulfate particles is included to account for additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, following the formulation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="text.60"/>. Prior to this study, secondary nitrate–ammonium aerosols were modeled using the TEQ module EQuilibrium Simplified Aerosol Model version v03b (EQSAM v03b; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="altparen.61"/>) for fine particles. It is important to note that EQSAM v03b exclusively considers sulfate–nitrate–ammonium partitioning and does not account for the presence of other species (i.e., dust or SS alkalinity). In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/> we detail the adoption of ISORROPIA-II v1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.62"/> for this study. To account for secondary nitrate aerosol formation on coarse dust and SS particles, a hybrid (HYB) approach was employed through an uptake reaction (UPTK) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1528">The reaction uses the uptake rate (<italic>K</italic>) defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.63"/> as a first-order function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="paren.64"/>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aerosol bin radius, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the gas-phase diffusion coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the mean molecular speed, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the aerosol-specific surface area, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the uptake coefficient, defined as the ratio of the number of gas molecules reacting with the particle's surface over the fraction of molecules being absorbed by the given surface (i.e., the accommodation coefficient) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.65"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1632">A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.1 was assumed for dust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx126" id="paren.66"/>, and 0.01 was used for SS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120" id="paren.67"/>. The production of fine and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was traced in separated bins.</p>
      <p id="d2e1661">Finally, MONARCH includes meteorology-driven emission modules for key species. Emissions of biogenic non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) and NO are calculated from the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) v2.04 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.68"/>. Several SS source functions are available in the model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="paren.69"/>; here, we use the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.70"/> formulation. Similarly, different parameterizations for dust emissions are available, ranging from more simplified to more physics-based descriptions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.71"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1676">Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.72"/>, the G01-UST scheme based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.73"/> described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.74"/> is used in this work.</p>
      <p id="d2e1688">Dust emission is limited to areas presenting a frequency of occurrence of dust optical depth above 0.2, identified using maps created from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Deep Blue retrievals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.75"/>. The surface roughness influence on dust emission is parameterized based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="text.76"/>, whose vegetation cover is determined using surface reflectance from Landsat and MODIS monthly data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.77"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1701">For the evaluation of the model's dust cycle, the reader is referred to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.78"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.79"/>, and for the SS cycle to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="text.80"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Model updates</title>
      <p id="d2e1722">In this study, we investigate the primary chemical pathways responsible for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation on preexisting particles, with a particular focus on coarse dust particles, by integrating mechanisms of varying complexity within the global model MONARCH (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> lists the irreversible and reversible heterogeneous reactions considered in our analysis. Here, we detail the enhancements implemented in MONARCH to partially or fully address the array of reactions of interest, with a primary focus on maintaining a balance between complexity, accuracy, and computational efficiency in the resulting solution.</p>
      <p id="d2e1742">To trace the formation of fine and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under moist conditions – the primary regime where these formation pathways occur <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.81"/> – an additional hydrophilic bin for the coarse mode of these species is added to the default MONARCH size parametrization, as detailed in Supplement  Table S2. The new bins account for the total mass of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed on both dust and SS particles indiscriminately. Sensitivity tests, with and without dust and SS in the UPTK and TEQ processes, assess their relative contributions (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1836">Illustration of the mineral dust heterogeneous chemistry mechanisms implemented in this work for fine and coarse particles. Fine dust aqueous coating is assumed to reach thermodynamic equilibrium (TEQ) with anthropogenic gas species to form fine particulate nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Conversely, coarse particulate nitrate is formed through either the reversible condensation (i.e. through TEQ) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after kinetic limitation or the irreversible uptake reaction (UPTK) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coarse dust particles. Particulate ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is formed through TEQ in both size modes.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1929">Heterogeneous reactions implemented in MONARCH. Dust and sea-salt particles are referred as  DU and  SS, respectively.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Irreversible reactions </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reaction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Process</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Notes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> + <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Condensation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SS</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Condensation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">UPTK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">UPTK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3, 4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SS</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCl</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">UPTK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4, 5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Gas–particle equilibrium reactions </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reaction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Process</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Notes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TEQ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TEQ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6, 7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TEQ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4, 8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgCO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TEQ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4, 8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R10)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TEQ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4, 8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TEQ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4, 8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(R12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCl</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TEQ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4, 9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e1932">1. Sulfuric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is assumed to completely condense on fine and coarse dust and SS, transferring mass to each size mode. The condensation reaction does not depend on dust and SS alkalinity but solely on their specific surface areas based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="text.82"/>.(2. The sulfur dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) uptake coefficient on dust (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a function of RH as defined in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.83"/> and based on experimental studies performed on calcite particles by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="text.84"/>. However, to account for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by deliquesced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the UPTK reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is performed even in the absence of alkalinity. That is why this reaction is considered to happen over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and not only over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, although it assumes the same dust alkalinity as in nitric acid uptake (Reaction R4). 3. The nitric acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) uptake coefficient on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a function of RH as defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.85"/> based on experimental studies performed on calcite particles by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.86"/>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is used instead of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration because the uptake coefficient is scaled for alkalinity, as shown in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>).4. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgCO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refer to the NVC content derived from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SS</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations using the fractions from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.87"/> for dust and from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="text.88"/> for SS (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>).5. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake coefficient on SS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is based on the experimental study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.89"/> that reports <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake kinetics for different RH and sea-salt particle sizes. An average value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for particles from 2.5 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m (coarse mode) is assumed, given ambient RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %. 6. Neutralization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by ammonia is calculated through TEQ with ISORROPIA-II. It is assumed to happen in the fine mode for all mechanisms and additionally in the coarse mode over coarse particles in those mechanisms, given coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx122" id="paren.90"/>. All reactants and products are assumed to remain in the aqueous phase (metastable assumption). 7. The result of the neutralization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if solid results are assumed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.91"/>, but under the metastable assumption, only aqueous ions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered.8. Calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium (NVCs) deliquesced from carbonates present in the bulk of dust particles neutralize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the liquid coating of dust aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.92"/>. Dust NVC content (i.e., alkalinity) is dependent on particle size and is globally averaged from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.93"/> mineral data. 9. Sodium chloride from sea-salt particles dissolves and reacts with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the liquid coating of sea-salt particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.94"/>. Sea salt also presents other NVCs that are included in Reactions (R8)–(R11), which are assumed to be globally homogeneous, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="text.95"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.96"/>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Irreversible heterogeneous chemistry of nitrate and sulfate</title>
      <p id="d2e3829">A widely adopted method to simulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation on coarse particles involves incorporating irreversible heterogeneous reactions of gas species on dust and SS through a first-order uptake parameterization. Specifically, the uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coarse particles is commonly assumed to drive coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.97"/>, while the uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is known to lead to the formation of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94 bib1.bibx110 bib1.bibx123 bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx136" id="paren.98"/>. Most models assume constant uptake coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for these reactions, for example <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on dust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx129" id="paren.99"/>. However, recent studies have shown that using this value tends to overestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx126 bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.100"/>. This suggests that the uptake coefficient for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should be lower and that it is highly influenced by RH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx126 bib1.bibx127 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx129" id="paren.101"/> and dust alkalinity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx129 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.102"/>. Recent studies increasingly implement <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of RH and employ different parameterizations of this function to account for dust alkalinity.</p>
      <p id="d2e4022">For our study, we extended the chemical mechanism of MONARCH to incorporate pathways for the formation of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sulfate aerosols (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). This extension involved refining irreversible heterogeneous parameterizations within the model, specifically the uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on dust and SS particles (Reactions R4–R5 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), as well as the uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on dust particles (Reaction R3 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). No additional heterogeneous chemistry, such as the transformation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the surface of dust particles, was considered due to its relatively low significance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.103"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4120">Our implementation incorporates dependencies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on RH and on the alkalinity of dust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx126 bib1.bibx127 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx129" id="paren.104"/>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dependency on RH is modeled akin to a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) isotherm, which characterizes water adsorption on dust particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx126" id="paren.105"/>. We employed a modified BET function to formulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, extending it to account for dust alkalinity. This formulation is represented by the following equation:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M164" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where RH is the relative humidity (ranging from 0 to 1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the water adsorption scaling factors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx126" id="paren.106"/>, and <italic>Sc</italic> is a factor dependent on dust alkalinity. For the uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on dust (Reaction R4 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), typical values assumed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 8.0 and 7.0, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx128" id="paren.107"/>. For <italic>Sc</italic>, however, the literature reports varying values based on dust alkalinity assumptions, ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the industrially standardized Arizona test dust (Möhler et al., 2006; Herich et al., 2009; Suman et al., 2024) to <italic>Sc</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.018 for samples from the China loess with 39 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx129" id="paren.108"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4330">We adopt the uptake RH functions for both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on dust from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.109"/>. To fit experimental data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="text.110"/> and the RH function reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.111"/>, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Reaction R4 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) we determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.112"/> assumed an NVC content of 3.0 % Ca and 0.6 % Mg, which differ from the NVC values used in the present study. Therefore, we use the alkalinity scaling factor <italic>Sc</italic> to normalize the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.113"/> function accordingly. Specifically, values for <italic>Sc</italic> are defined as the ratio of Ca and Mg percentages used in our study relative to those assumed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.114"/>, resulting in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the two average alkalinity values derived from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.115"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.116"/>, respectively, that are used in our experiments (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/> below). Note that <italic>Sc</italic> is zero if no alkalinity is considered and that a constant value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used for RH higher than 80 %.</p>
      <p id="d2e4528">Similarly, we determined the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on dust (Reaction R3 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), fitting Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) to experimental data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="text.117"/> and the RH function from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.118"/>, yielding values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The same <italic>Sc</italic> values used for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are applied for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4666">However, if alkalinity is not considered, <italic>Sc</italic> is set to 1.0 (and not zero, as is the case for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to account for the oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by deliquesced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx123 bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx135 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.119"/>. For RH above 90 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains constant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4788">For the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on SS (Reaction R5 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), we adopted the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.120"/>, which provide experimental estimates of this factor for different particle sizes and RH. However, a clear uptake function on these parameters has not been found in the literature. Therefore, for the sake of simplicity, we defer an implementation of an uptake coefficient dependent on these metrics to future research. In this study, we did not account for the RH dependency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and instead we used average values at 80 % RH, resulting in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for SS particles in the range of 0.1 to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for particles larger than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p>
      <p id="d2e4911">While larger values have been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.121"/>, we opted for these values as they align with more widely accepted ranges found in the literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.122"/>. Using higher values could potentially overestimate the uptake on SS particles.</p>
      <p id="d2e4920">The condensation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Reactions R1–R2 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) on dust and SS is another relevant source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> introduced in our model. Due to the extremely low volatility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at atmospheric temperatures, its condensation onto existing particles is assumed to be irreversible and complete. This process signifies a direct mass transfer from the gas to the aerosol phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx138 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.123"/>. The amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that condenses in the fine and coarse modes is determined using the kinetic diffusive coefficients calculated as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Reversible heterogeneous chemistry of nitrate and ammonium</title>
      <p id="d2e5024">The gas–aerosol partitioning of semivolatile inorganic aerosols in previous studies with MONARCH was based on the EQSAM v03b TEQ model. EQSAM provides a computationally efficient approach that bypasses the expensive iterative activity coefficient calculation employed in other thermodynamic models. EQSAM was originally designed to handle the partitioning of the ammonium–sulfate–nitrate–water system, excluding solid components, and was extended to include solids, HCl, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in version v03b, the one used in MONARCH. One of the limitations of this version is the lack of information on NVCs and/or mineral species in traced species.</p>
      <p id="d2e5045">For this study, we implemented the ISORROPIA-II v1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.124"/> TEQ model as an additional option in MONARCH to investigate the sensitivity of the partitioning of semivolatile inorganic compounds to NVCs. While a more recent version of ISORROPIA-II (v2.3) exists, which improves aerosol pH estimations at near-pH-neutral conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="paren.125"/>, global-scale simulations have shown only minor differences when compared to ISORROPIA-II v1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.126"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5057">ISORROPIA-II v1 determines TEQ concentrations of gas, liquid, and solid phases. It can assume either stable conditions,  where compounds precipitate into solids, or metastable conditions, where compounds remain as supersaturated liquid solutions. To enhance computational efficiency, ISORROPIA-II employs a segmented approach to calculate TEQ concentrations. This approach defines five different regimes based on the ratios of precursor species (i.e., sulfate, sodium, and crustal species), RH, and temperature. Each regime addresses a specific subset of relevant species and equilibrium equations. Efficiency is further improved by retrieving species' activity coefficients from lookup tables <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.127"/>. The medium's acidity is determined by the concentrations of acidic and basic gaseous species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and crustal ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which are inputs to ISORROPIA-II. After TEQ is calculated with these species, the resulting pH is provided by the thermodynamic model.</p>
      <p id="d2e5230">In this work, we use the metastable solution of ISORROPIA-II, assuming that all the resulting particulate compounds from the TEQ computation remain in the liquid phase. Previous studies comparing stable and metastable methodologies with ISORROPIA-II have reported only marginal differences in global nitrate budgets between both modes. At global scales, these differences showed slightly higher pH values (0.5) and nitrate formation (2 %) when using the metastable assumption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.128"/>, although these differences are reported to be more important (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pH units and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % nitrate concentrations) close to regions with low RH and a high concentration of crustal species or in their downwind areas. However, given the global-scale scope of the present study, we used the metastable assumption since it allows for full traceability of total aerosol nitrate, ammonium, and sulfate formation (Reactions R6–R12 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e5256">We also adopt the temperature and pressure applicability range for ISORROPIA-II proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117" id="text.129"/>, which highlights potential instabilities in reactions occurring below 250 °K and 200 hPa. Consequently, ISORROPIA-II computations are limited to cells with temperature and pressure values above these thresholds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Dust and sea-salt alkalinity</title>
      <p id="d2e5270">Alkalinity refers to the ability of a substance to neutralize acids and maintain a stable pH level. Both dust and SS particles contain NVCs that contribute to the overall alkalinity of the aerosol, thereby neutralizing gas acidic species such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sulfates.</p>
      <p id="d2e5291">To investigate the importance of representing dust alkalinity, we derive a global average size-dependent NVC content from 5-year-long MONARCH simulations that explicitly track dust mineral species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.130"/>. To assess the uncertainty arising from our limited knowledge of the soil mineralogy of dust sources, we relied on two different MONARCH experiments detailed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.131"/>, which utilized the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.132"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.133"/> soil mineralogical datasets. The simulation based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.134"/> accounts for 8 distinct minerals, whereas the simulations based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.135"/> for 12 minerals (Table S3). The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.136"/> dataset includes quartz, feldspar, illite, smectite, kaolinite, calcite, gypsum, and hematite. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.137"/> dataset includes those minerals as well as chlorite, vermiculite, mica, and goethite (Table S5). In this study, we adopt an upper bound for the mineral solubility and reactivity with gas species based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.138"/>. Moreover, we assume size-dependent but globally homogeneous values for dust mineralogy, and consequently dust alkalinity and NVC, to focus on understanding heterogeneous reaction parameterizations. We defer the analysis of the potential importance of geographical dust mineralogical variations on dust heterogeneous chemistry to a forthcoming study.</p>
      <p id="d2e5322">Based on the global average mineral mass fraction for each dust size bin derived from the mineralogy simulations and the elemental composition associated with each mineral (see the Supplement Tables S4 and S6), we estimate the average NVC content per dust size bin at each time step following Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M220" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NVC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fNVC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where the NVC concentration for each element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., Ca, Mg, K, Na) and size bin <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (NVC<sub><italic>i</italic>,<italic>j</italic></sub>) at a given location is derived by considering the molar fraction of each element in each mineral <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (fNV<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the global average mass fraction of each mineral and size bin (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the bin's dust concentration at the specified location (DU<sub><italic>i</italic></sub>). NVC<sub><italic>i</italic>,<italic>j</italic></sub> serves as input to the TEQ calculation.  We consider only minerals soluble in water or acids that may at least partly dissolve in the liquid coating of the particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124" id="paren.139"/>, and only NVCs reacting with the gas species in ISORROPIA-II are used (calcite, magnesium, potassium, sulfate, chlorite, or sodium) for the calculation.</p>
      <p id="d2e5477">The dust NVC global average content results in 5.17 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.79 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2.37 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 1.32 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.140"/> dataset and 3.68 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.87 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 3.15 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 1.75 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.141"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5588">The size-resolved NVC percentages for each dust bin are reported in the Supplement  Tables S3, S4, S5, and S6.</p>
      <p id="d2e5591">In most of the sensitivity runs, the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.142"/> global average is employed if not stated otherwise (see Table 3). Values for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.143"/> are used solely in one sensitivity test, as explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>. These values are within the range reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.144"/> (5.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.69 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.90 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.34 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 1.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.20 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.145"/> dataset results in a higher proportion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.146"/> one, while similar fractions for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are reported.</p>
      <p id="d2e5727">Additionally, as discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>, the dust NVCs derived imply the application of the scaling factors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) for the irreversible uptake experiments, assuming the average alkalinity derived from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.147"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.148"/> simulations, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e5769">Regarding SS, we use a global average composition from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="text.149"/>, with 55 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 30.6 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 7.7 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 3.7 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1.2 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 1.1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e5856">Sequence of reactions and calculations performed for each scheme (rows). In columns, the sequence order (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the gas/aerosol mode of each process are indicated. Dust and sea-salt particles are referred to as DU and SS, respectively, and condensation is abbreviated as  Cond.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mechanism</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">t0: fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">t1: fine DU</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">t2: coarse DU</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">t3: gas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">t4: fine DU and SS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">t5: coarse DU</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">t6: coarse SS</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">t7: fine/coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">Cond. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">HYB</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">UPTK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">UPTK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TEQ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">UPTK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">UPTK (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cond. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">DIFFLIM</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry namest="col7" nameend="col8">TEQ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Cond. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Nitrate mechanisms under study</title>
      <p id="d2e6233">In atmospheric conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibit higher volatility compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a result, their condensation onto liquid coatings around particles is a reversible process and should not be assumed to be irreversible uptake reactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124" id="paren.150"/>. Different mechanisms have been proposed to model the partitioning of nitrate and ammonium across the entire aerosol size range, aiming to mitigate the computationally expensive cost of solving the dynamic mass transfer equations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.151"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6301">The assumption of TEQ between the gas and aerosol phases provides a practical approximation to account for the potential evaporation of already dissolved molecules in the liquid coating of fine particles. Equilibrium timescales for fine ammonium nitrate (diameter less than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) are typically on the order of minutes under typical atmospheric conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx131 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.152"/>. However, in TEQ models, it is assumed that TEQ is reached within each model time step (on the order of few minutes). This assumption is reasonable for fine particles but less so for coarse particles, where achieving equilibrium can take minutes to hours <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.153"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6318">To overcome this limitation, different approaches have been proposed in the literature to incorporate the condensation–evaporation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coarse particles while minimizing computational costs. In this study, we explore two such methods. (1) The hybrid method (HYB) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.154"/> solves the partitioning over fine particles using a TEQ model and employs a first-order irreversible uptake (UPTK) reaction for condensation over coarse particles (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>). (2) A more refined approach treats the formation of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a reversible process through the combination of a double call of the TEQ calculation, one for the fine and one for the coarse mode (DBCLL), together with a kinetic limitation of the gas species involved in the partitioning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="paren.155"/>. These two mechanisms are evaluated in this study to assess their impact on the formation of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. Additionally, for the purpose of comparison, a scheme neglecting coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (fTEQ) is also employed. We briefly describe each approach below.</p>
      <p id="d2e6420">The fTEQ approach solves the partitioning of semivolatile inorganic species with ISORROPIA-II exclusively within the fine mode to assess the effect of neglecting coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation on atmospheric composition. This mechanism solves the nitric–ammonia–sulfate neutralization (Reactions R6–R7 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), accounting for the effects of alkalinity (Reactions R8–R12 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) if fine dust and SS are considered in the mixture. Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influence the ambient pH, they are always involved in any TEQ calculation. As described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>, aqueous sulfate formation is solved through the oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DMS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, however, only 50 % of the remaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed to directly nucleate as fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through the aqueous-phase chemistry, while the rest condenses into fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through Reactions (R1) and (R2) in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a). While in our study fTEQ serves as a sensitivity test to assess the impact of neglecting coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, the fTEQ approach may be appropriate in environments where coarse particles are sparse or in applications focusing primarily on fine particle formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.156"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6611">Conversely, the HYB mechanism (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a) is a commonly employed strategy in atmospheric chemistry models to represent nitrate formation on coarse particles. It solves <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation through a sequential implementation of (1) the TEQ reaction between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, considering internal mixing with the fine dust and SS modes (Reactions R6–R12 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), and (2) an irreversible first-order UPTK reaction of the remaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the coarse modes of dust and SS, excluding its evaporation back to the gas phase (Reactions R4 and R5 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). The UPTK reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows the implementation detailed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>. Sulfate is treated in an analogous manner to the fTEQ mechanism.</p>
      <p id="d2e6708">Finally, the DBCLL mechanism (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="paren.157"/> treats coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation as a reversible condensation–evaporation process. Firstly, the DBCLL methodology involves the calculation of kinetic diffusion limitation (DIFFLIM) coefficients for both the fine and coarse size modes of each of the condensing gas species, which restricts the amount of gas available to condense on each mode (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). DIFFLIM has been implemented based on the formulation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx125" id="text.158"/> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its extension to other gases by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="text.159"/>. Following DIFFLIM, sequential TEQ calculations are conducted over the fine and coarse modes (double call of the TEQ model, Reactions R8–R12 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), using the DIFFLIM coefficients to limit the availability of the gas condensing in each mode.</p>
      <p id="d2e6776">Regarding the sulfate treatment in DBCLL, a similar approach to fTEQ is employed, but the DIFFLIM coefficients calculated for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used to condense the available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into either the fine mode or the coarse mode of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Reactions R1 and R2 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e6847">Scheme of the heterogeneous chemistry reactions on dust and SS developed in this work. <bold>(a)</bold> Schemes for the fTEQ and HYB mechanisms. <bold>(b)</bold> Scheme for the DBCLL mechanism that includes the kinetic diffusion limitation of gas species. The legend for the line patterns is included in the center box. Numbers represent (1) fTEQ, (2) HYB, and (3) DBCLL. At the bottom, the pathways for the processing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gases for each scheme are represented: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken up by fine particles and the remaining gas is taken up by coarse particles. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(a)</bold> the fTEQ and HYB mechanisms assume that it nucleates directly as fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while <bold>(b)</bold> the DBCLL mechanism assumes that 50 % of its concentration nucleates and the rest is divided by diffusion limitation to form fine and coarse modes of particulate sulfate, completely condensing on each of them. The uptake coefficients used for the uptake processes (solid arrows) are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on dust and SS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on dust.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Sensitivity runs</title>
      <p id="d2e7039">We performed global simulations based on the mechanisms described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>. Overall, 11 different runs (Table 3) are analyzed to test different degrees of complexity and sensitivity to parameterizations when simulating heterogeneous chemistry of dust, such as the hypothesis on reversibility of nitrate formation and the role that dust (and SS) alkalinity play in the partitioning of gas and aerosol species. Unless otherwise stated, all the experiments employ dust alkalinity derived from the average of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.160"/> simulation, as explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7049">Three initial run sets are conducted neglecting coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, serving as a comparison reference for following experiments including coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The noHC run assumes that there is no formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol through heterogeneous chemistry on any aerosol particle, serving as a baseline to estimate the burden of gas condensing in particles in other configurations and the influence of particle formation on nitrogen deposition rates. Additionally, two sensitivity experiments with fTEQ are included to discuss the impact of ignoring the partitioning of semivolatile inorganic species on coarse particles: fTEQ_noAlk neglects the presence of dust or SS in the aerosol mixture (Reactions R6–R7 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), while fTEQ_du-ssAlk considers TEQ between gas and NVCs in the fine modes of dust and SS particles (Reactions R6–R12 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e7125">Next, we addressed the condensation of nitrate across the entire particle size range with runs employing the HYB and DBCLL mechanisms. We conducted two sensitivity runs with the HYB mechanism to explore the impact of implementing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UPTK reaction on coarse dust only (HYB_duUPTK, Reaction R4 from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) and on both coarse dust and SS (HYB_du-ssUPTK, Reactions R4 and R5), comparing their results to assess the relative contributions of dust and SS in heterogeneous chemistry under the assumption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> irreversible UPTK in the coarse mode.</p>
      <p id="d2e7166">In the HYB approach, all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are initially available to condense in the fine mode through TEQ reactions. Only the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remaining after the TEQ calculation is considered for UPTK reactions in the coarse mode. This assumption may potentially lead to a misrepresentation of fine and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, such as the underproduction of fine and overproduction of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.161"/>. To address this potential limitation, an additional simulation (HYB_DL) was conducted using the DIFFLIM calculation to distribute the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas that is kinetically available for condensation in the fine mode through TEQ and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that can form coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through UPTK reactions.</p>
      <p id="d2e7321">Furthermore, to assess the influence of the UPTK coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the results, instead of using an RH function (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>), we also conducted a simulation setting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for dust (HYB_g0p1), following experimental findings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.162"/> and various modeling studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.163"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7372">Finally, we conducted four sensitivity simulations using the DBCLL mechanism, which accounts for reversible heterogeneous nitrate chemistry on both fine and coarse modes. These simulations evaluate the influence of alkalinity, including the DBCLL_noAlk run that excludes both dust and SS NVC content (Reactions R6–R7, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), the DBCLL_duAlk run accounting for dust alkalinity only (Reactions R8–R11), and the DBCLL_du-ssAlk run accounting for both dust and SS alkalinity (Reactions R8–R12). Additionally, since all three cases use dust alkalinity from the average of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.164"/> simulation, an additional simulation was performed using the average dust alkalinity from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.165"/> simulations (DBCLL_Claq) instead of that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.166"/> to assess the effect of the specific dust alkalinity content used.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Experimental setup</title>
      <p id="d2e7395">The model simulations were conducted on a global domain at a spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>° longitude by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>° latitude, utilizing 48 hybrid pressure–sigma vertical layers up to 5 hPa. The dynamics time step was set to 180 s, and results were stored every 6 h. The analysis period is the year 2018 after a spin-up period of half a year to initialize the concentration fields. Meteorological variables were initialized from the ERA5 reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.167"/> every 24 h to keep the modeled circulation close to observations. A meteorological spin-up of 12 h was used in each daily cycle before solving the chemistry. The initial state of the chemistry fields is that prognostically calculated by MONARCH the day before.</p>
      <p id="d2e7415">In addition to the meteorology-driven online emissions described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>, the High-Elective Resolution Modeling Emission System version 3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.168"><named-content content-type="pre">HERMESv3;</named-content></xref> was employed to process both anthropogenic and biomass burning primary emissions. The global inventory CAMS-GLOB-ANT_v4.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113" id="paren.169"/> for 2016 was used for anthropogenic sources, with updated temporal profiles that provide gridded monthly, day-of-the-year, day-of-the-week, and hourly weighting factors for the temporal disaggregation of emitted fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.170"/>. The biomass burning emissions are provided by the GFASv1.2 dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.171"/>, which accounts for forest, grassland, and agricultural waste fires derived from satellite products. Oceanic natural emissions of DMS are provided by CAMS-GLOB-OCE_v3.1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.172"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7438">Table S1 summarizes the total emissions (anthropogenic, biogenic, and biomass burning) used in this work. The emitted mass of the main anthropogenic aerosol precursors is 104.4 Tg for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 93.8 Tg for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 61.8 Tg for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e7499">The sensitivity experiments conducted in this study and the processes performed in each one of them (green boxes). Fine TEQ and coarse TEQ refer to the respective calculations of the TEQ for the fine and coarse modes of dust and SS, referred to as DU and SS, respectively. Coarse DU UPTK and coarse SS UPTK indicate the irreversible UPTK of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coarse dust and SS, respectively. Alkalinity is denoted as alk., and for the dust alkalinity column, the alkalinity derived from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.173"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.174"/> simulations is indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
  <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025-t03.png"/>
</table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Model evaluation</title>
      <p id="d2e7553">The model results are evaluated against surface observational datasets from several networks sourced from the Globally Harmonised Observational Surface Treatment (GHOST) project, an initiative of BSC's Earth Department dedicated to the harmonization of publicly available global surface observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.175"/>. Figure S13 in the Supplement shows the stations used for each of the species analyzed. For gas and aerosol nitrate, ammonia, and sulfate species, GHOST includes datasets from the Clean Air Status and Trends Network (US-EPA-CASTNET), the US EPA Air Quality System (US-EPA-AQS), and the Canada National Air Pollution Surveillance Program (NAPS) for North and Central America; the East Asia Acid Deposition Monitoring Network (EANET) for Asia; and the EBAS and the European Environmental Agency Air Quality (EEA AQ eReporting) for Europe.</p>
      <p id="d2e7559">These observations are filtered for rural and background sites only in order to exclude stations near emission sources not representative of the background conditions depicted by the model resolution, which describes the long-range transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. However, information on the station type was not available for the EANET and US-EPA-CASTNET data. For these networks, all stations were used, a factor that has to be accounted for when evaluating the results.</p>
      <p id="d2e7604">Regarding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, GHOST includes data from the CHILE-SINCA network for Chile, the Beijing Municipal Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center (BJMEMC), the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (CNEMC), the WMO World Data Center for Aerosols (EBAS-WMO-WDCA) for Europe, the Japan National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), the Ministerio de Transición Ecológica (MITECO) for Spain, the UK AIR network for the United Kingdom, and the global AirNow DOS network (US-EPA-AirNow-DOS). For these networks, the station type was not included as a criterion for inclusion in the evaluation. The statistical metrics used in the evaluation are outlined in the Supplement  Sect. S3 and the quality flags for the selected stations in Table S8.</p>
      <p id="d2e7629">Additionally, we compare our model results with the budgets reported in the literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.176"/>. Namely, the AeroCom phase III nitrate experiment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.177"/> compares global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets from nine global models for the year 2008. Particular discussion is devoted to results shown there from the GMI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.178"/> and EMAC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.179"/> models that introduce approaches that are of interest to our work. Complementarily, results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.180"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.181"/> are also used. The comparison provides a qualitative view of current estimates of particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in the atmosphere and the role of representing key processes in models. Since results from the literature are provided for different years, some of the differences may be attributed to changes in emissions and environmental conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Spatial distributions</title>
      <p id="d2e7693">The spatial distribution of nitrate species exhibits significant variability depending on the assumed formation mechanisms. Here, we analyze the results of the main sensitivity runs arranged in order of increasing complexity, as detailed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>. These simulations range from a basic scenario that considers only fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation while excluding dust and sea-salt alkalinity (i.e., fTEQ) to a comprehensive approach that incorporates reversible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in both fine and coarse modes (i.e., HYB and DBCLL).</p>
      <p id="d2e7724">Spatial distributions of surface concentration, column load, and zonal average concentration for all sensitivity simulations (see Table 3) are averaged for 2018 and presented for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>,  S1, and  S2 in the Supplement), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. S4,  S5, and  S6 in the Supplement), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. S7, S8, and  S9 in the Supplement).  To facilitate readability, the analysis of the HYB_g0p1, DBCLL_duAlk, and DBCLL_ClaqAlk runs is provided in Supplement  Sect. S5.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Effects of omitting coarse nitrate formation</title>
      <p id="d2e7833">In the fTEQ_noAlk sensitivity run, fine particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> primarily forms in regions with significant anthropogenic pollution – areas where emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are dominant – such as northern China and India, Europe, and eastern North America. In these regions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches average concentrations of 2 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>e). At the surface, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mostly associated with fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, presenting concentrations between 1 and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>e and  S4e in the Supplement). At higher altitudes, fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also forms in the presence of dust and SS, resulting in column burdens ranging from 1 to 3 mg m<sup>−2</sup> (Figs. S5 and  S8 in the Supplement). This occurs because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> neutralizes particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which forms when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> condense on fine dust and SS particles.</p>
      <p id="d2e8084">The omission of dust and SS alkalinity leads to globally low pH values. Over oceanic and dusty regions, aerosol pH typically ranges from 1 to 2, while in industrialized regions, such as Europe and Asia, pH values can reach up to 5 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a).</p>
      <p id="d2e8089">Aerosol pH increases significantly when dust and SS NVC are included in the fTEQ_du-ssAlk run (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b). This effect is especially pronounced over the open ocean, where pH increases from 1 to 5, and over dust source regions such as the Sahara Desert, where pH increases from 1 to 9.</p>
      <p id="d2e8094">Column burdens of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are notably affected by the elevated pH, decreasing by approximately 5 mg m<sup>−2</sup> across the Northern Hemisphere compared to the fTEQ_noAlk scenario (Fig. S1d, g in the Supplement). This decline predominantly happens in the upper troposphere (above 500 hPa, Fig. S2d, g), where concentrations decrease by about 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (Fig. S2 in the Supplement). Conversely, column burdens of fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase substantially, by more than 5 mg m<sup>−2</sup> over dusty regions such as the Saharan Desert and Middle East (Fig. S1e, h). In remote oceanic regions, fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column burdens increase by approximately 1 mg m<sup>−2</sup>, with transoceanic transport at low latitudes showing column loads ranging from 4 to 7 mg m<sup>−2</sup> (Fig. S1h in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d2e8212">At the surface, the inclusion of dust and SS alkalinity has a minimal impact on  continental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d, g). Surface fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of about 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> are present across the equatorial belt, with higher values, up to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, over remote dusty regions. However, no significant increase in fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is simulated in polluted areas such as Europe and Asia (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>e, h and Fig. S2e, h).</p>
      <p id="d2e8304">These results suggest that the condensation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on dust and SS happens mostly during long-range transport, representing a key driver of nitrate formation in this scenario. They also indicate that incorporating Reactions (R8)–(R12) increases fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, with the majority forming on dust rather than on SS. This is attributed to the relatively higher alkalinity of dust compared to SS, as derived from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.182"/> dataset (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Effects of assuming irreversible formation of coarse nitrate</title>
      <p id="d2e8351">The HYB methods exclude the possibility of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evaporating back to the gas phase, which may lead  to positive biases in global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens.</p>
      <p id="d2e8380">In the HYB_duUPTK sensitivity run, coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> forms exclusively on dust, redistributing the available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> towards coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in regions affected by dust, such as the Middle East and East Asia. Coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column loads average between 0.5 and 4.0 mg m<sup>−2</sup> across the Northern Hemisphere, with peaks reaching 10–20 mg m<sup>−2</sup> (Fig. S1l in the Supplement). Notably, this impact is less pronounced in the Saharan dust belt, where limited <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability constrains coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. The production of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is accompanied by a modest reduction in fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column loads over dusty regions (around 1 mg m<sup>−2</sup>) compared to that in the fTEQ_du-ssAlk simulation, driven by the availability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation.</p>
      <p id="d2e8566">The uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> significantly influences the long-range transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, showcasing notable transatlantic and transpacific transport (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). This transport predominantly occurs below 800hPa, with concentrations around 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, although lower concentrations of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are also discernible at altitudes up to 400 hPa (Fig. S2 in the Supplement). At the surface, coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations also increase, ranging from 2 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> over regions such as China, India, and the Middle East (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> l).</p>
      <p id="d2e8669">The HYB_du-ssUPTK run investigates the role of SS by enabling both Reaction (R4) and Reaction (R5) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e8675">The uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on SS enhances the formation of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the open ocean and those coastal areas affected by SS outbreaks (Fig. S11 in the Supplement). Surface concentrations in Europe and North America reach 1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, with regions exceeding 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>  significantly expanding (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>o). Coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also becomes notable over western Siberia, eastern South America, and southern Africa (0.5–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and over remote oceanic regions (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). Its presence extends to high altitudes in the Southern Hemisphere (Fig. S2o in the Supplement). Long-range transport of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is enhanced over oceans, with column burdens increasing  by approximately 3.5 mg m<sup>−2</sup> (Fig. S1o in the Supplement) compared to those in the HYB_duUPTK case. This increase is attributed to greater depletion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through irreversible uptake over dust and SS (Fig. S1m in the Supplement), resulting in lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the atmosphere compared to the other simulations.</p>
      <p id="d2e8867">Results obtained by increasing the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the HYB_g0p1 scenario (Supplement  Sect. S5 and Fig. S3) provide insights into the nature of the coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transoceanic transport. While the inclusion of UPTK on SS enhances long-range transport, the HYB_g0p1 run shows a slight increase in coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to HYB_du-ssUPTK, particularly over the Sahara and across the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Although these differences are not major, they suggest that the availability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may act as a limiting factor for coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation.</p>
      <p id="d2e8945">To further explore this phenomenon, we used the HYB_DL run, which is equivalent to the HYB_du-ssUPTK run but constrains the available gas using the DIFFLIM calculation (see Methods section). This approach results in coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column burdens just below those obtained in HYB_g0p1. The similarity between HYB_DL and HYB_du-ssUPTK can be attributed to two possible factors: (1) HYB_DL conserves more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for reactions on coarse dust during long-range transport via Reactions (R4) and (R5) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) or (2) there is an intrinsic overestimation of the uptake coefficients, leading to similar coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation rates regardless of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> available. This is further discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e9015">Overall, results show that the HYB mechanisms preferentially condense <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via TEQ in the fine mode and over SS through R5 in the coarse mode rather than over coarse dust through R4, as noted here and also assessed in subsequent sections.</p>
      <p id="d2e9036">A comparison of the spatial distributions obtained by the EMEP, INCA, and GMI models in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.183"/>, which employ HYB approaches similar to our HYB_du-ssUPTK run, reveals comparable trends. All models show significant formation of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (fine and coarse) over polluted regions, although our results, ranging from 10 to 25 mg m<sup>−2</sup>, generally exceed the column loads reported by AeroCom models, which range from 7 to 16 mg m<sup>−2</sup> (Fig. S1n, o in the Supplement). AeroCom models do not show such the pronounced transport of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the North Atlantic, as was observed in our study, with column burdens of 0.2–0.5 mg m<sup>−2</sup> compared to 4 mg m<sup>−2</sup> in our results. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/> further investigates the excessive formation of particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the HYB mechanism in terms of the total nitrogen budget.</p>
      <p id="d2e9132">A closer comparison with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.184"/>, using the LMDz-INCA model with UPTK reactions on dust and SS, shows strong agreement with our HYB_duUPTK run but not with HYB_du-ssUPTK. For instance, concentrations of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over polluted areas in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.185"/> align with HYB_duUPTK in both geographical distribution and magnitude (14–20 mg m<sup>−2</sup> in HYB_duUPTK vs. 10–20 mg m<sup>−2</sup> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.186"/>, Fig. S1l). Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.187"/> simulate fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport downwind of the Sahara and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the North Atlantic, with column burdens around 1–2 mg m<sup>−2</sup>, slightly below our HYB_duUPTK results of 1–5 mg m<sup>−2</sup>. This preferential similarity of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.188"/> to HYB_duUPTK rather than HYB_du-ssUPTK, may be attributed to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UPTK coefficient for SS employed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.189"/>. For this reaction, instead of a constant value as used in HYB_du-ssUPTK, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.190"/> use a function of RH ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation over SS in their model. This comparison suggests a potential overestimation of the UPTK coefficient for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on SS in the HYB_du-ssUPTK simulation. This conclusion is further discussed in the observational evaluation (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>) and the budget analysis (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e9325">As a final remark, it is important to note that, similar to the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.191"/>, the HYB_duUPTK simulations overestimate particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations compared to observational data, as discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e9346">To further investigate the source of the coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overestimation in the HYB_du-ssUPTK simulation, we compare our spatial distributions with those from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.192"/>, which employ a similar HYB mechanism using the Met Office Unified Model (UM). In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.193"/>, fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation is computed using adaptations from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.194"/>, specifically by testing different accommodation coefficients for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> onto preexisting ammonium nitrate aerosols – although this adjustment has minimal impact on coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. Coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is formed through the uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with coefficients sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.195"/> for dust and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.196"/> for SS. Despite using different uptake coefficients for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on SS, the resulting coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution is broadly comparable to that of the HYB_du-ssUPTK simulation. However, key differences  emerge between the two models. Compared to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.197"/> model, HYB_du-ssUPTK exhibits a stronger tendency for coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation over polluted areas such as Europe, eastern North America, and Asia (8–20 mg m<sup>−2</sup> in HYB_du-ssUPTK vs. 4 mg m<sup>−2</sup> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="altparen.198"/>), as well as over oceanic regions (1.5–3.0 vs. 0.4–2.0 mg m<sup>−2</sup>) rather than over sub-Saharan areas. Remarkably, significant North Atlantic transport of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.0–4.0 mg m<sup>−2</sup>) is only present in our simulation and is absent in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.199"/>. The global budget comparison in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/> further highlights the fact that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.200"/> report significantly lower global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens compared to our HYB runs, including HYB_duUPTK. This suggests that the HYB mechanisms in our simulations may produce coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> excessively, as both the burdens and distributions of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.201"/> are consistently lower, despite also accounting for SS in nitrate formation.</p>
      <p id="d2e9619">Nevertheless, several alternative explanations could account for the differences between the models. These include differences in the fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation mechanism, variations in the study period (2018 in our study vs. a 20-year average in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="altparen.202"/>), and differing parameterizations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on SS.</p>
      <p id="d2e9656">Overall, the comparison of spatial distributions between our HYB mechanisms and those reported in the literature supports the initial hypothesis that the assumption of irreversible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, and potentially the uptake coefficients used, may contribute to the overestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. This issue is examined in greater detail in Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Effects of accounting for reversible formation of coarse nitrate</title>
      <p id="d2e9703">The DBCLL simulations (described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/> and Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> and 3) assess the impact of reversible chemistry and the roles of dust and SS NVC in nitrate partitioning.</p>
      <p id="d2e9710">The DBCLL_noAlk run produces spatial distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> similar to those in the fTEQ_noAlk run. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains predominantly in the gas phase across the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. S1p in the Supplement), while fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> primarily associates with fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over regions lacking dust or SS influence, such as parts of China, India, Europe, and eastern North America (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>q). Minimal concentrations of fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are simulated at higher altitudes (Fig. S2q in the Supplement), although fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coexists with sulfate particles at elevated levels, as observed in the fTEQ_du-ssAlk case. In contrast, coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is nearly absent in DBCLL_noAlk, with only minimal surface concentrations over northern China (0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and no clear  correlation with dust and SS presence (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>r). Coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation is similarly limited, with a slight presence over the Persian Gulf and the Sahara (0.02–0.1 mg m<sup>−2</sup>), primarily in anthropologically polluted regions where it forms alongside coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.2 mg m<sup>−2</sup>) (Figs. S5r and  S8r). The simultaneous formation of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles is attributed to diffusion limitation, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> preferentially neutralizes coarse sulfate particles.</p>
      <p id="d2e9954">The differences between fTEQ_noAlk and DBCLL_noAlk illustrate the impact of diffusion limitation before the partitioning of semivolatile species. While fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation remains consistent between both runs, the assumption of allowing all acid species to partition into the fine mode in fTEQ_noAlk leads to enhanced fine particle production and long-range transport – an effect not observed in DBCLL_noAlk. Consistently, the pH in the fine mode closely mirrors that in fTEQ_noAlk, while the pH of particles in the coarse mode indicates even greater acidity (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>f1, f2).</p>
      <p id="d2e9972">Including dust and SS alkalinity in  DBCLL_du-ssAlk produces an important increase in the pH over arid regions and oceanic regions – from 1 to 5–6 in the fine mode and above 7 in the coarse mode – compared to DBCLL_noAlk (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>h1, h2). Relative to DBCLL_du-Alk (dust alkalinity only; see Supplement Sect. S5), DBCLL_du-ssAlk redistributes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning toward the coarse mode: fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations approximately halve across regions, while coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface concentrations and column loads roughly double over dusty regions but not over the ocean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>w, x and  S1w, x). This shift leads to enhanced transatlantic and transpacific transport, with column loads of 2–4 mg m<sup>−2</sup>, surface concentrations of 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, and zonal averages of 0.5–1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>.  Over continental regions with dust concentrations, coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches column loads of 4–5 mg m<sup>−2</sup> and surface concentrations of 0.5–1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>. Additionally,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface concentrations increase from 0.1 to 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> in the heavily polluted areas (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>s, v). The enhancement of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation is attributed to SS NVCs (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suppressing fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation and leaving more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> available for transport and subsequent coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation over dusty regions.</p>
      <p id="d2e10230">Including SS alkalinity reduces fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loads over Europe and eastern North America from 3 to 1 mg m<sup>−2</sup> and slightly lowers values over Asia (2–3 mg m<sup>−2</sup>). Conversely, coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases over Europe and eastern North America (0.1–0.2 mg m<sup>−2</sup>), Asia (up to 1.0 mg m<sup>−2</sup>), and transoceanic regions (0.1 mg m<sup>−2</sup>) (Fig. S5x in the Supplement). This redistribution mirrors the particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns, highlighting the strong coupling between these species when TEQ is applied to  both fine and coarse partitioning. These results emphasize the sensitivity of nitrate formation to SS alkalinity, particularly due to basic NVCs like <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e10344">Compared to the HYB_du-ssUPTK run, DBCLL_du-ssAlk shows lower coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and shifts coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation toward dusty rather than anthropologically polluted areas. For example, over Europe,  surface concentrations in DBCLL_du-ssAlk do not exceed 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, while HYB_du-ssUPTK reports 1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>x).</p>
      <p id="d2e10416">Overall, regardless of the mechanism used, the results demonstrate the high sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation to dust and SS alkalinity, significantly altering its spatial distribution (Reactions R8 to R12, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). However, implementing the DIFFLIM calculation in the DBCLL mechanism has a limited impact, as shown by the comparison between fTEQ_noAlk and DBCLL_noAlk.</p>
      <p id="d2e10434">We compare DBCLL_du-ssAlk and the results from the EMAC model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.203"/>, which similarly employs TEQ for the bulk gas and aerosol mass, followed by DIFFLIM. Additionally, EMAC makes use of globally heterogeneous dust alkalinity based on 12 mineralogy source data points. Results from the EMAC model are reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.204"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.205"/> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/> and Supplement Sect. S4). Surface distributions of aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are closely aligned in both models over Europe and North America, with surface concentrations ranging from 1 to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>. However, DBCLL_du-ssAlk shows higher concentrations over Asia, India, and the Middle East compared to EMAC (5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> vs. 6–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively). Additionally, our results show some variations over secondary areas compared to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.206"/>. EMAC reports biases, such as underestimating coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over southern Europe and central-eastern Asia, attributed to excessive sulfate condensation on dust – a limitation mitigated in our study due to lower sulfate levels (Fig. S7 in the Supplement). Additionally, while EMAC overestimates fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Arctic, this is not observed in our results due to the RH and temperature restrictions applied in ISORROPIA-II (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>). Over central Africa, EMAC overpredicts coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to excessive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from biomass burning coupled with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from where <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.207"/> suggested that an HYB approach could reduce the bias. Our DBCLL_du-ssAlk and HYB runs report lower concentrations, although still potentially overestimated due to too-low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. Total particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are in close agreement in both EMAC and the DBCLL_du-ssAlk run (Fig. S4w, x and S7w, x in the Supplement), with only slightly higher formation of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Indian subcontinent in MONARCH compared to EMAC.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e10674">Surface concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and fine and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulated by the different mechanisms and averaged for 2018.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e10737">Surface pH of the mechanisms studied for fine and coarse aerosol size modes, averaged for 2018.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Evaluation with observations</title>
      <p id="d2e10755">To assess the performance of each sensitivity run, we compare simulated surface concentrations of key species involved in nitrate formation with observational data, as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS6"/>. This evaluation includes analyses of both statistics and time series of monthly mean values, focusing on how effectively each modeled mechanism captures observed nitrate variability on a global scale. Globally averaged results are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, while region-specific evaluations for Europe, Asia, and central North America are presented in Fig. S12 in the Supplement. It is important to note that the number of stations and spatial coverage vary significantly by species, as illustrated in Fig. S13. Consequently, certain evaluation metrics may not fully reflect global model performance and could instead represent accuracy in data-rich regions.</p>
      <p id="d2e10762">Correlation coefficients, bias, and root-mean-square error (RMSE) metrics for the different sensitivity simulations are reported in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>, with methodological details outlined in Supplement  Sect. S3. A detailed evaluation of the HYB_g0p1, DBCLL_duAlk and DBCLL_ClaqAlk simulations is available in Supplement Sect. S5. Additionally, a similar evaluation for total reduced and oxidized nitrogen species is presented in Supplement Sect. S6 and further discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Nitrate species</title>
      <p id="d2e10776">Fine particulate nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is consistently formed by all mechanisms (through TEQ), with the exception of the DBCLL scheme, which incorporates a DIFFLIM coefficient to limit its formation. Consequently, the fTEQ and HYB mechanisms produce higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from October to April (0.5–1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) than DBCLL does, which reports approximately half of these values. This discrepancy is more pronounced over North and Central America than in Europe, although both regions exhibit similar seasonal patterns. From April to October, differences among mechanisms diminish, except in the HYB_du-ssUPTK, which significantly overestimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during these months.</p>
      <p id="d2e10847">Notably, the runs considering the effects of dust and SS alkalinity in the partitioning process reduce the negative bias in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> significantly, especially during February.</p>
      <p id="d2e10866">Greater variability among experiments emerges when evaluating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with more observational data available over North and Central America than over Europe or Asia. This variability is highly influenced by how each mechanism models coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, especially over Asia (Fig. S12 in the Supplement). For example, the HYB runs, which rely on irreversible uptake reactions, consistently overestimate total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across all regions. In contrast, the DBCLL runs, which assume reversible partitioning, align better with observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e10926">From the HYB simulations, the HYB_duUPTK run demonstrates strong correlation coefficients for both fine and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (0.8 and 0.9, respectively). The seasonal variability in this run closely resembles that of the fTEQ_noAlk and fTEQ_du-ssAlk experiments, which fully neglect coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. This similarity suggests a limited number of sites affected significantly by coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, while highlighting the relevant role of the TEQ calculation in the fine mode. Despite showing a systematic positive bias (0.03, 0.04, and 0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), HYB_duUPTK maintains consistency across continents. However, it notably overestimates total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Asia in November and over Europe from May to September, likely due to dust events affecting the monitoring sites.</p>
      <p id="d2e11047">Including the UPTK reactions on SS in the HYB_du-ssUPTK run exacerbates this overestimation due to excessive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> condensation into coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Specifically, the correlation for total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drops from 0.9 to 0.66, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are underestimated (bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>), and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface concentrations are overestimated by 1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> – the highest bias among all sensitivity runs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). This overestimation is most pronounced over Asia (3–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> vs. 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and North and Central America (1.5–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> vs.  1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). Discrepancies in European sites are more pronounced during summer and fall (Fig. S12 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d2e11257">To evaluate whether this overestimation results from unlimited <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we examined the HYB_g0p1 and HYB_DL configurations (Supplement  Sect. S5). Increasing the uptake coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in HYB_g0p1 further enhances the overestimation of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by an additional 30 %, suggesting that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability is not the limiting factor. Similarly, HYB_DL shows only a marginal reduction in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bias (from 1.5 to 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>), reinforcing the idea that the overestimation stems from the overly high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for SS particles, as previously discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2"/>. This highlights the need to refine HYB schemes.</p>
      <p id="d2e11381">Conversely, DBCLL mechanisms markedly reduce surface concentration biases. Without alkalinity, the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bias shifts from 0.29 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> between the HYB and DBCLL runs. Incorporating dust and SS NVCs further improves the bias, reducing it from 1.5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> between the HYB_du-ssUPTK and DBCLL_du-ssAlk runs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). All consistently achieve high correlation coefficients (approximately 0.8).</p>
      <p id="d2e11454">However, the DBCLL_noAlk run tends to underestimate total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and overestimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>), failing to  capture its seasonal cycle (correlations of 0.06). Surprisingly, the fTEQ runs outperform DBCLL_noAlk despite neglecting coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation.</p>
      <p id="d2e11556">Including dust and SS alkalinity in DBCLL_du-ssAlk substantially improves these biases. Enhanced condensation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into both fine and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) yields a reduced bias in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and a strong seasonal agreement, with correlation coefficients of 0.82 and 0.78 for fine and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. These results also outperform the DBCLL_duAlk run, which excludes SS alkalinity (Supplement  Sect. S5 and Table S7).</p>
      <p id="d2e11646">The evaluation of the DBCLL experiments highlights the paramount importance of accounting for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation on both dust and SS to accurately represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d2e11694">The sensitivity of model performance to the dust NVC representation is further assessed using the DBCLL_Claq run, which applies an average dust alkalinity based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.208"/> instead of on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.209"/> (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>). Results show limited differences compared to DBCLL_du-ssAlk, with the correlation and bias for total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> just slightly improved in DBCLL_Claq, at 0.81 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively (Supplement Sect. S5 and Table S7). The time series from Fig. S14 compared to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> also shows comparably similar results when using DBCLL with the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.210"/> or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.211"/> mineral datasets. Overall, based on the limited number of observation sites used in our evaluation, the impact of dust NVC representation on surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations does not appear to be significant at the observational points.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Ammonia and particulate ammonium</title>
      <p id="d2e11775">Results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally more consistent across all mechanisms compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outcomes. This consistency is expected, as all sensitivity runs use the same condensation pathway for the conversion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through Reactions (R6) and (R7) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e11856">All mechanisms effectively capture the seasonal cycle of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Correlation coefficients for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range from 0.85 to 0.88, while those for fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range from 0.59 to 0.77. However, model performance is slightly weaker for total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with correlations between 0.41 and 0.54.</p>
      <p id="d2e11934">The DBCLL_du-ssAlk and DBCLL_Claq runs yield the lowest errors for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. RMSEs are 0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> for fine and 0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> for total concentrations, with corresponding biases of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02  and 0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> and S7). These results highlight the significant sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> predictions to the treatment of dust and SS NVCs. Including or omitting NVC representation notably affects the biases across different schemes. Unlike <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, increased particle alkalinity reduces the condensation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thereby limiting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. This effect helps mitigate biases when compared to observational data.</p>
      <p id="d2e12078">Overall, biases for both fine and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remain relatively low in most experiments, ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02 to 0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Sulfur species</title>
      <p id="d2e12130">Results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are consistent across all sensitivity simulations. This consistency is expected since sulfate formation is  independent of the pathways used for coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. In all cases, particulate  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is produced from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a similar manner (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). Differences arise solely from variations in the treatment of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficient when accounting for dust alkalinity, which introduces slight differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. Overall, the model slightly underestimates both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly at European monitoring sites. In contrasts, fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is marginally overestimated, mainly driven by observations from Central and North American sites. Temporal correlation coefficients average around 0.6, with slightly lower values for total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e12341">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the slight mismatch with observational data primarily stems from the European evaluation, which presents a consistent negative bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> throughout the period studied (Fig. S12 in the Supplement). Fine and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations also show generally good agreement with observations. However, there is a modest overestimation of fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, with an average bias of 0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, particularly over Central and North America. Conversely, total particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface concentrations are underestimated over Europe, with an average bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.43 (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> and Fig. S12 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d2e12467">The negative bias in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations may be attributed to the sulfate formation scheme and sulfur emission inventories employed in our runs. Reevaluating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake coefficient could provide valuable insights. The current implementation uses the uptake coefficient function from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.212"/>. Alternative formulations have been suggested in the literature, such as the uptake coefficient values proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="text.213"/> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on dust and those by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx110" id="text.214"/> for uptake on SS, as reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.215"/>. Exploring these alternatives may help improve the model's representation of sulfur species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>3.2.4</label><title>Fine and total particulate matter</title>
      <p id="d2e12543">Results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are consistent across the different sensitivity runs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>), indicating that the total mass is more influenced by components other than secondary inorganic species.</p>
      <p id="d2e12570">Globally, the seasonal cycles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are reproduced well across all sensitivity runs, with correlation coefficients consistently around 0.75. However, annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are overestimated by an average of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations over Asia show good agreement with observations, indicating that the model underestimates coarse particulate matter (PM), especially at monitoring sites in mainland China (Supplement  Figs. S12 and S13). It is important to note that regions with significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overestimation do not overlap with the limited sites where chemical composition measurements are available – locations where the model accurately represents total particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Supplement Fig. S12). Our results suggest that the absence of anthropogenic coarse dust emissions in the CAMS emission inventory may hinder the formation of coarse inorganic species, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The formation of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is critical for scavenging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and suppressing the formation of fine particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by providing surfaces for heterogeneous reactions. The significant influence of typically neglected anthropogenic coarse PM emissions on nitrate formation has been emphasized in previous studies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx140" id="altparen.216"/>), highlighting the need for improved emission inventories to better capture the interactions between coarse particles and nitrogen species.</p>
      <p id="d2e12727">In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model results over Europe and North and Central America are well aligned with observations (Fig. S12). The evaluation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows just slightly worsened RMSEs (ranging from 22.49 to 30.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and correlation coefficients (from 0.36 to 0.46) compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (RMSEs from 24.74 to 26.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> and correlations from 0.74 to 0.76, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). This is attributed to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface concentration underestimations over North and Central America, especially from April to September, which do not seem to be caused by the underestimation of any secondary inorganic aerosol species studied in this work. Over Europe, our results are in agreement with those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.217"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e12823">Observational evaluation of gas and particulate species surface concentrations. Solid-black dots and crosses represent the monthly median and mean of the observations, respectively. Colored lines represent each configuration's monthly median over the observational points. Error bars are the observational interquartile 0.25 to 0.75 distance. Blue shading is the interquartile 0.25–0.75 distance for the DBCLL_du-ssAlk simulation. For the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> modes, the available data from the European, Asian, and North and Central American stations have been averaged together, despite data from Asia and North and Central America referring to total particle concentration, while data from Europe is limited strictly to particles with diameters up to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e12856">Correlation coefficients, bias (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>), and root-mean-square error (RMSE, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) of each configuration's median with respect to the median of the observations, corresponding to the time series shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">Total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">RMSE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noHC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">-0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_duUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_du-ssUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.46</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">Total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">RMSE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noHC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.46</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_duUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_du-ssUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">Total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">RMSE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noHC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_duUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_du-ssUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">Corr.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Bias</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">noHC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_duUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_du-ssUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Nitrogen partitioning</title>
      <p id="d2e14355">In this section, we explore the impact of coarse particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation on the overall partitioning of atmospheric nitrogen between the gas and particle phases (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1"/>). Additionally, we analyze how this formation influences the distribution of nitrogen between its oxidized and reduced forms (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2"/>). The observational evaluation of surface concentrations of total reduced and oxidized nitrogen is presented in Supplement  Sect. S6.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e14377">Atmospheric nitrogen average burdens <bold>(a)</bold> and accumulated depositions <bold>(b)</bold> in teragrams of nitrogen (TgN) for the different dust heterogeneous chemistry mechanisms. The corresponding fractions of the nitrogen-containing species simulated in MONARCH are shown in each bar plot. Total nitrogen deposition is reported at the top of each bar of the deposition chart.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Partitioning between gas and particle phases</title>
      <p id="d2e14399">The partitioning of atmospheric nitrogen species into the gas and aerosol phases varies according to the underlying chemical assumptions. We analyze the average atmospheric burden and deposition of nitrogen species in the MONARCH model across sensitivity runs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and Table S13 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d2e14404">The simulation labeled noHC, excluding heterogeneous chemistry involving nitrate, serves as the baseline for understanding  the distribution of nitrogen species in the gas phase. Under this configuration,  the dominant nitrogen species are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, peroxyacetyl nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PAN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with burdens of 1.06, 0.8, 0.71, and 0.38 TgN, respectively. The longer atmospheric lifetimes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PAN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> result from their chemical stability compared to more reactive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species.  Notably, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a key role in nighttime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production via heterogeneous hydrolysis  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="paren.218"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e14544">The total nitrogen burden is highly sensitive to the nitrate formation mechanism. Schemes promoting efficient coarse mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation significantly reduce nitrogen burdens.</p>
      <p id="d2e14560">For example, assuming irreversible condensation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> onto coarse particles reduces nitrogen load by 32 % and 40 % when considering dust only (HYB_duUPTK) and both dust and SS (HYB_du-ssUPTK), respectively. In HYB_duUPTK, 0.13 TgN partitions into fine and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on dust. Including SS (HYB_du-ssUPTK) further increases consumption of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, leading to a total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden of 0.27 TgN, while the fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden remains unchanged at 0.12 TgN (Supplement Table S13).</p>
      <p id="d2e14653">Comparing HYB runs to fTEQ_du-ssAlk reveals that dust and SS uptake reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens by 0.21 TgN (dust) and 0.50 TgN (dust and SS) relative to TEQ-only partitioning. This is driven by irreversible uptake in the coarse mode. Consequently, the deposition rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases from 80 to 140 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup>, and its atmospheric lifetime decreases from 2.6 to 2.3 d (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>). The combined UPTK on dust and SS nearly depletes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leaving only 0.15 TgN, which contributes to the overestimation of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e14737">Irreversible condensation also reduces the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens to 0.11, 0.17, and 0.01 TgN, respectively, due to enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis on increased particle surfaces. This reduction can be attributed to increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particle formation and, consequently, the available surface where hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can take place. Ultimately, this produces more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> available for partitioning into the particle phase.</p>
      <p id="d2e14875">Conversely, nitrogen loads increase when reversible condensation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is considered in the fTEQ and DBCLL sensitivity simulations. A larger proportion of nitrogen remains in the gas phase compared to in the HYB schemes. Notably, neglecting dust and SS alkalinity (fTEQ_noAlk, DBCLL_noAlk) slightly increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens (from 1.11 to 1.14 TgN) and elevates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 0.29 % and 0.12 %, respectively. When dust and SS alkalinity are considered (fTEQ_du-ssAlk, DBCLL_duAlk, DBCLL_du-ssAlk), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens decrease by 40 %–50 %, enhancing particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. This shift towards the aerosol phase results from the neutralization of NVC from dust and SS by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In these cases, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets decrease by approximately 20 % compared to analogous mechanisms without alkalinity, driven by the more efficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aqueous dissociation due to the increased particle presence. SS alkalinity alters the partitioning of aerosol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from fine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>72 %) towards coarse mode (+63 %) when comparing DBCLL_duAlk and DBCLL_du-ssAlk, resulting in burdens of 0.06 (fine) and 0.18 TgN (coarse) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). This surge in coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation with dust and SS alkalinity causes a 26 % decrease in the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden and a 14 % increase in deposition rates compared to the DBCLL_duAlk case, mainly driven by the enhanced wet deposition of coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from 11.0 to 27.5 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>). This can be attributed to the higher deposition efficiency of SS particles due to their larger size ranges and abundances near the surface. Consequently, the presence of SS decreases the atmospheric lifetime of particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 4.9 to 3.1 d, contrasting with scenarios that consider only dust alkalinity.</p>
      <p id="d2e15186">Additionally, SS NVCs (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) inhibit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> condensation into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, reducing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens from 0.31 to 0.22 Tg (Table S11).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Reduced and oxidized nitrogen</title>
      <p id="d2e15253">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> presents the annual averaged burdens and depositions of oxidized (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and reduced (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) nitrogen for each sensitivity run. These results are compared with  global estimates from the AeroCom phase III nitrate experiment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.219"/>, which offers a comprehensive range of budgets derived from different global aerosol models employing mechanisms similar to those analyzed in our study. As additional references, the results from the EMAC model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.220"/> and the LMDz-INCA model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.221"/> are shown separately from the average of AeroCom in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> due to their similarities to the DBCLL and HYB mechanisms, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e15332">The HYB mechanisms yield an annual average burden of oxidized nitrogen of 0.55 TgN, slightly below the AeroCom multimodel mean but in close agreement with that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.222"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e15338">Compared to the fTEQ and DBCLL mechanisms that account for dust and sea salt (SS) alkalinity, which show higher oxidized nitrogen burdens (0.6–0.8 TgN), the HYB mechanisms fall on the lower end of the distribution. This reduction is primarily due to the efficient deposition of particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the limited atmospheric presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under the assumption of irreversible uptake, as discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e15376">For reduced nitrogen species, the HYB mechanisms produce an average burden of approximately 0.3 TgN, aligning well with the AeroCom mean. However, HYB configurations yield lower particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens (0.15 TgN, Table S11 in the Supplement) and higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in the gas phase compared to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.223"/> mechanism and others. Among HYB cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets show an inverse relationship with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> acts as a limiting factor for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> neutralization in the fine mode. Given that most <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consumed by the UPTK reactions in the HYB mechanism, these results suggest that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass formed with this configuration is mainly a product of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> neutralization with sulfate through the fTEQ calculation.</p>
      <p id="d2e15536">The fTEQ and DBCLL mechanisms exhibit a high sensitivity in the partitioning of oxidized and reduced nitrogen to alkalinity, regardless of whether coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation is considered. When dust and SS alkalinity are neglected (fTEQ_noAlk and DBCLL_noAlk), oxidized nitrogen burdens rise significantly, to 1.1 TgN, primarily due to the accumulation of unreacted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which slightly exceeds the burden in the noHC run (1.05 TgN). This is attributed to the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hydrolysis to aerosol loading. Conversely, reduced nitrogen burdens in these schemes remain relatively low compared to other mechanisms due to the high consumption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the neutralization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which acts as an important sink of reduced nitrogen as particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The introduction of dust and SS NVCs into the reactions decreases oxidized nitrogen by an enhanced consumption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, reduced nitrogen concentrations increase as a consequence of the lower availability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to neutralize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This phenomenon is similarly observed in simulations, including TEQ calculations over fine (fTEQ_du-ssAlk) and over both fine and coarse modes (DBCLL_duAlk and DBCLL_du-ssAlk). Comparatively, the presence of dust and SS alkalinity decreases the oxidized nitrogen burdens by approximately 27 % compared to analogous simulations neglecting NVCs. However, contrasting the results between DBCLL_duAlk and DBCLL_du-ssAlk shows that while the presence of SS NVCs further enhances the consumption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 20 %, it concurrently reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens by 5 %. This is likely due to SS contributing acidic anions such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>), which hinders the formation of particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the fine mode and leaves more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> available to form coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over dust. This is consistent with the spatial distributions discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3"/> and the nitrogen budgets presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e15822">Alkalinity leads to higher reduced nitrogen budgets due to enhanced basic conditions (high pH, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>) facilitated by dust and SS NVCs. This environment inhibits <inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> condensation over dust and SS particles, thereby increasing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atmospheric lifetime (Table S10) and allowing it to mix with sulfate from polluted areas, as can be seen in the spatial correlation between particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see discussion in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/> and Figs. S4 and S7). Consequently, alkalinity facilitates the formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through the neutralization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by sulfate, contrasting with the neutralization process involving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in the DBCLL_noAlk simulation.</p>
      <p id="d2e15944">Overall, the DBCLL_du-ssAlk run aligns with the average of AeroCom in both oxidized and reduced partitions, although its reduced phase falls below EMAC levels. This discrepancy can be attributed to EMAC showing very low deposition rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Table S10), which enhances its atmospheric burden.</p>
      <p id="d2e15965">The observational evaluation of both reduced and oxidized species, along with the monitoring stations used, can be found in the Supplement  Sect. S6. Overall, general good agreement with observations is obtained. Oxidized nitrogen species exhibit low biases in all mechanisms except HYB_du-ssUPTK, which overestimates observations throughout the period studied, supporting the conclusion that the UPTK coefficients used are excessively efficient. Reduced nitrogen species, while slightly underestimated, remain well within the observational variability range.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e15970">Average 2018 nitrogen budgets <bold>(a, b)</bold> and depositions <bold>(c, d)</bold> for the different dust heterogeneous chemistry mechanisms. Each plot shows oxidized <bold>(a, c)</bold> and reduced <bold>(b, d)</bold> mass for each mechanism (bars). They are compared with references from the literature (the final three bars on the right).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/4719/2025/acp-25-4719-2025-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Nitrate budgets</title>
      <p id="d2e16000">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets from the sensitivity runs are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>, including burdens; wet and dry deposition; productivities; and the lifetimes of fine, coarse, and total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Comparative data from previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.224"/> are also included. Analogous information on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be found in Supplement Sect. S4 (Tables S9 to S12).</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d2e16103">Results for fine, coarse, and total particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained using the heterogeneous chemistry mechanisms studied. Results from the literature references are reported in the second half of the table: the average of all the participating models in the intercomparison AeroCom phase III nitrate experiment for 2008 (AeroCom), specifying their standard deviation (SD  AeroCom), results from the GMI model (GMI, using a similar HYB approach with UPTK reactions on dust and SS), and results from the EMAC model (EMAC 2008, using a similar approach to DBCLL_du-ssAlk). Also using the EMAC model, results obtained by the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.225"/> study are reported as EMAC 2005–2008. Results from models using a similar approach to HYB_du-ssUPTK are reported as  IFS for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.226"/>, LMDz-INCA for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.227"/>, and Met Office UM for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.228"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="19">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="18" colname="col18" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="19" colname="col19" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Burden (Tg) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">Wet dep. (Tg yr<sup>−1</sup>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center" colsep="1">Dry dep.  (Tg yr<sup>−1</sup>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col11" nameend="col13" align="center" colsep="1">Total dep. (Tg yr<sup>−1</sup>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col14" nameend="col16" align="center" colsep="1">Production (Tg yr<sup>−1</sup>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col17" nameend="col19" align="center">Lifetime (d) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">Fine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">Coarse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">Total</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">2.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">fTEQ_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">36.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">43.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">43.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">43.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">43.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">2.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_duUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">63.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">31.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">49.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">80.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">31.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">48.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">80.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">2.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_du-ssUPTK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">103.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">114.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">23.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">26.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">13.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">127.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">140.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">13.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">126.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">140.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">2.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_gdust=0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">111.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">120.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">27.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">29.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">10.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">138.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">149.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">10.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">138.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">149.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">2.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HYB_DL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">109.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">112.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">25.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">27.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">135.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">139.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">135.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">139.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">17.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">2.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_noAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">2.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_duAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">34.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">19.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">54.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">34.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">19.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">53.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">4.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_du-ssAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">45.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">22.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">40.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">62.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">22.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">40.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">62.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">3.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">3.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBCLL_ClaqAlk</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">45.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">21.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">40.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">61.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">21.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">40.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">61.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">3.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">3.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AeroCom</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">45.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">20.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">66.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">60.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">5.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SD AeroCom</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GMI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">43.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">14.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">58.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">59.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">6.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EMAC 2008<sup>1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">46.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">46.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EMAC 2005–2008<sup>2</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IFS<sup>3</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">75.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">23.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">40.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">63.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">103.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">40.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">63.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">103.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">3.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LMDz-INCA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">56.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">63.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">14.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">49.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">63.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">4.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Met Office UM<sup>4</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">63.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">39.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">102.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">27.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">73.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">101.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">3.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e16131">1. From <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.229"/>.2. From <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.230"/>.3. Fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reported from neutralization of nitric acid, ammonia, and sulfate. Coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is from heterogeneous chemistry. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.231"/>.4. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.232"/> perform two sensitivity tests with the accommodation coefficient used for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in the fine mode: FAST, with 0.193, and  SLOW, with 0.001. Here, results from the FAST test are reported on the basis that they present similar fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation rates to our average fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results. </p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e17624">The sensitivity runs conducted in this study yield a wide range of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens, ranging from 0.09 to 1.93 Tg. Experiments neglecting coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the role of NVCs fall on the lower end of this spectrum, while the HYB schemes consistently report higher burdens. The coarse-to-fine ratio decreases in the mechanisms that neglect NVCs partly or completely in the nitrate partitioning, and HYB runs consistently simulate the highest coarse burdens (0.57 to 1.43 Tg). Compared to the reported values in the literature, both the HYB (1.15 to 1.93 Tg) and DBCLL (1.04 to 1.44 Tg) schemes considering NVCs fall within the upper range of the Aerocom total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.233"/> and above specific global models such as IFS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="paren.234"/> or Met Office UM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.235"/>. Similar differences are found in total annual depositions, with ranges that span a factor of 2 among schemes. For wet deposition, DBCLL mechanisms show values ranging from 37 to 45 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup>, within the lower half of the range found in the literature (45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> for AeroCom to 75 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> for IFS), while HYB consistently simulates higher estimates even beyond the reported values (63 to 120 Tg). This feature is also seen in the dry deposition. Consequently, the lifetimes of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/> range from 2.3 to 2.6 d for the HYB schemes, systematically estimating the lowest lifetimes. Conversely, models introducing reversible partitioning provide longer lifetimes (2.6 to 4.9 d). To better understand the possible reasons for such a wide range of estimates, in the next paragraphs we analyze some of our sensitivity runs compared to similar systems in the literature.</p>
      <p id="d2e17736">The assumption of irreversibility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> condensation onto dust and SS particles (HYB_du-ssUPTK run) produces the largest increase in coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, exceeding the values reported in the literature. For instance, the HYB_du-ssUPTK model reports a total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden of 1.75 Tg, which is higher than the AeroCom range (0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56 Tg) and than values from models such as EMAC in AeroCom <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.236"/>, as well as findings from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.237"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.238"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.239"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.240"/> (0.67, 0.89, 0.82, and 0.80 Tg, respectively). Interestingly, the results surpass those from three AeroCom models (EMEP, INCA, and GMI) using a similar HYB approach with UPTK reactions on dust and SS, which range from 0.26 to 0.95 Tg of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="altparen.241"/>). Multiple reasons could explain the excessive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation found in this comparison. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.242"/> employ a similar HYB implementation and UPTK coefficients for dust as the HYB_du-ssUPTK run, although a different parametrization for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UPTK on SS. Despite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.243"/> also overestimating particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a global normalized mean bias of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>68 %, the HYB_du-ssUPTK simulation still reports higher burdens for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.80 vs. 1.75 Tg) and lower burdens for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.35 vs. 0.69 Tg, Table S9). Our study also presents lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions than those in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.244"/>, which would imply a reduced availability of precursor gases that would typically result in lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (40.8 vs. 46.0 TgN, Table S1 in the Supplement). Additionally, the run neglecting the uptake on SS (HYB_duUPTK) reports values closer to observations (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>) and to the budgets in the literature.</p>
      <p id="d2e17941">This suggests that the high coefficients used for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UPTK on SS may be excessively efficient. This conclusion is consistent with analyses discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2"/>, <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>, and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>. In comparison, other systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.245"/> typically employ much lower UPTK coefficients for SS compared to our implementation.</p>
      <p id="d2e17971">Therefore, a function for the uptake coefficient on SS dependent on relative humidity and on SS particle size should be considered in future work, following the same approach as for dust (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). However, such a function has not clearly been determined in the literature. While <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.246"/> assume a BET isotherm for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UPTK on SS similar to the UPTK on dust <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.247"/>, it remains unclear if this approach is as suitable for SS as it is for dust. To our best knowledge, the most appropriate alternative to the assumption of averaged UPTK coefficients for SS would be to fit a function to the experimental values reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.248"/>, which provides uptake coefficient dependencies with relative humidity and particle size. However, several discrepancies between <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.249"/> and previous studies still remain unresolved <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120 bib1.bibx105" id="paren.250"/>, presenting difficulties in reaching a common agreement on a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UPTK coefficient function on SS.</p>
      <p id="d2e18028">Beyond the excessive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation driven by the UPTK on SS, the sole implementation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UPTK on dust (HYB_duUPTK run) still slightly exceeds the particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burdens and deposition rates reported by the references (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>). This is also observed when compared to observational surface concentrations (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>), suggesting that the sole UPTK on dust results in excessive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. Given that previous studies have consistently shown non-negligible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on SS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.251"/>, these biases could be explained by (1) an excessive UPTK coefficient employed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> UPTK on dust, (2) the inherent inappropriateness of the irreversible condensation assumption of gas species on particles to simulate particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, or (3) the different atmospheric lifetimes of coarse particles among different systems. Regarding possible issues in the UPTK parameterization on dust adopted in our study, the inclusion of the scaling factor for alkalinity added to the dust uptake coefficients (<italic>Sc</italic> in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) could contribute to excessively high UPTK rates. This alkalinity scaling factor is based on the NVC fractions provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.252"/>, namely calcium and magnesium (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>). Since our study includes additional NVCs (i.e., potassium and sodium), this estimation might not be representative and could result in excessive condensation. However, additional information on the NVC content in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.253"/> is missing to refine our approach. Concerning the possible inappropriateness of the irreversible condensation assumption, indeed, models implementing such an approach with similar UPTK coefficients tend to overestimate particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.254"/>. This might point to the assumption of reversible evaporation–condensation of gas species or to the inclusion of alkalinity consumption as necessary implementations to improve the results.</p>
      <p id="d2e18175">Lastly, a longer lifetime of coarse particles such as dust or SS could contribute to the enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production regardless of the mechanism adopted. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="text.255"/> compared different SS emission schemes in the MONARCH model and reported lifetimes ranging from 4 to 12 d, including results from the literature. These findings highlight significant differences in emission, transport, and sedimentation schemes among global models, which are not negligible. Such differences could explain part of the variations identified in our analysis. For instance, if a model assumes a longer lifetime for coarse particles, it would result in a prolonged period during which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can condense onto these particles, thus increasing the overall burden of particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Understanding and standardizing these lifetimes could be crucial to achieve more consistent and accurate predictions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol formation across different modeling frameworks.</p>
      <p id="d2e18238">Linking with the limitations of irreversible approaches, we finally analyze the DBCLL runs to illustrate the paramount role of alkalinity in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. Neglecting NVC in the partitioning (DBCLL_noAlk) results in negligible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, with a burden of just 0.06 Tg in the fine mode  (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>). In contrast, only considering dust alkalinity (DBCLL_duAlk) significantly increases the burden of both fine and coarse modes to 0.96 and 0.47 Tg, respectively, which exceeds the estimates reported in other works <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.256"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e18273">Additionally, accounting for SS alkalinity (Reaction R12 from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), the DBCLL_du-ssAlk run shifts particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation from the fine towards the coarse mode, increasing coarse burdens from 0.47 Tg  in DBCLL_duAlk to 0.78 Tg. Consequently, this leads to higher total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition rates, rising from 54 to 62 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup>. Including both dust and SS alkalinity results in a notable agreement for total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.07 Tg) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.53 Tg) burdens with the values reported in the literature. This improvement highlights the importance of considering both dust and SS alkalinity when accurately modeling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation and deposition rates in atmospheric chemistry simulations.</p>
      <p id="d2e18361">Some differences emerge when comparing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> size distribution to references that report fine and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets. Specifically, the fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden tends to be on the lower end of the range of the literature references (0.28 Tg vs. 0.39 Tg on average), while the coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden is on the higher end (0.78 Tg vs. 0.54 Tg on average), although the relatively high variability between the references in both modes should be considered. Despite these variations, accounting for alkalinity significantly improves the agreement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lifetime (3.1 d) compared to AeroCom (5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3 d), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.257"/> (3.0 d), and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.258"/> (3.2 d).</p>
      <p id="d2e18443">To delve into the differences observed between simulations employing constant dust alkalinity derived from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.259"/> (DBCLL_du-ssAlk) and that from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.260"/> (DBCLL_ClaqAlk, discussed in Supplement Sect. S5) as shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>, it becomes evident that DBCLL_ClaqAlk results in a noticeable shift towards fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (from 0.28  to 0.40 Tg), with fine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increasing its lifetime (from 2.3 to 3.5 d) and coarse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreasing it (from 3.6 to 2.8 d). Also, we observe a slightly higher burden of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (from 2.53  to 2.58 Tg) and a lower burden of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (from 0.35  to 0.31 Tg) (see Supplement  Tables S9 and S10). This can be attributed to the higher fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M928" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NVCs in the fine mode derived from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.261"/> (5.73 %) compared to that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.262"/> (3.68 %). Both datasets present more similar fractions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the coarse mode (4.61 % vs. 3.74 %) (see Supplement  Tables S4 and S6). This underscores the important role that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NVCs play in heterogeneous chemistry. As a matter of fact,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions surpasses the fractions of other NVC in the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.263"/> dataset (0.07 % Na, 0.78 % K, and 0.43 % Mg, Tables S3 to S6). The comparison between DBCLL_du-ssAlk and DBCLL_ClaqAlk provides a quantification of the impact that mineral distributions among dust sources (especially calcite) have on gas–aerosol partitioning, especially in the formation of particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It also highlights the importance of advancing the representation of mineralogical dust composition at the global scale and its regional variability.</p>
      <p id="d2e18609">Finally, we compare the outcomes from the DBCLL_du-ssAlk simulation with those reported by the EMAC model, which employs a similar approach to the DBCLL mechanism and also accounts for dust and SS alkalinity (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3"/>). The analysis is performed against two studies where EMAC budgets were reported: the AeroCom intercomparison nitrate experiment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.264"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.265"/> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>). It is notable that the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden (1.07 Tg) in DBCLL_du-ssAlk exceeds both the EMAC results from AeroCom (0.67 Tg) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.266"/> (0.44 Tg), although our findings show reasonable agreement with observations, especially over Asia  (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>). Regarding the total budget of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.53 Tg), despite our result closely matching the AeroCom experiment average (2.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.83 Tg, Table S9), it is below the values reported by EMAC in this experiment (3.10 Tg) while significantly exceeding results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.267"/> (1.65 Tg). These outcomes reveal intrinsic differences in the rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> condensation on dust and SS between both models. Conversely, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> burden (0.35 Tg) in our simulation falls below those reported by both studies (0.85 and 0.82 Tg, respectively), potentially due to the high formation of particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over dust and SS NVCs in our study. Nevertheless, the resulting burdens for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> align with both references (0.22 vs. 0.19 and 0.17 Tg for EMAC in AeroCom and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.268"/>, respectively). Various factors could explain the differences observed between EMAC and the DBCLL_du-ssAlk simulation: the different simulated periods between our study and those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.269"/> and AeroCom (2018 vs. 2005–2008 average and 2008, respectively), the varying NVC contents assumed for dust and SS between DBCLL_du-ssAlk and EMAC (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3"/>), and the intrinsic differences in the heterogeneous chemistry mechanisms employed in both models (DIFFLIM and DBCLL in MONARCH and bulk TEQ followed by DIFFLIM in EMAC). Despite their conceptual equivalence, our results demonstrate that these mechanisms may yield different outcomes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e18749">In this study, we conducted a comprehensive exploration of  the processes driving nitrate formation on fine and coarse particles at a global scale using the MONARCH atmospheric model. Our sensitivity simulations incorporated state-of-the-art dust heterogeneous chemistry mechanisms, including reversible condensation–evaporation through thermodynamic equilibrium (TEQ) and irreversible uptake reactions (UPTK) between gas and aerosol phases. Three mechanisms for particulate nitrate formation were implemented: (1) fTEQ, which considers fine nitrate formation through reversible TEQ reactions and neglects coarse nitrate; (2) HYB, where fine nitrate forms via TEQ with a subsequent irreversible uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coarse particles; and (3) DBCLL, which allows for both fine and coarse nitrate formation through reversible TEQ processes with kinetic gas limitation.</p>
      <p id="d2e18770">Key assumptions such as uptake coefficients, reversible partitioning, and the inclusion of dust and sea-salt alkalinity were thoroughly assessed. Global average dust alkalinity was sourced from previous dust mineralogy simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.270"/> using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.271"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.272"/> mineral atlases, while globally homogeneous sea-salt alkalinity values are derived from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="text.273"/>. We evaluated annual cycle surface concentrations against observations for various atmospheric species and compared global spatial distributions and budgets with the existing literature. Additionally, we investigated the partitioning of nitrogen species and assessed the impact of dust and sea-salt heterogeneous chemistry on total nitrogen budgets.</p>
      <p id="d2e18785">Neglecting coarse nitrate formation (fTEQ_du-ssAlk run) results in budgets and distributions of fine nitrate that closely match observational surface concentrations of total nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> bias, 0.88 correlation). This good agreement suggests that observational stations are dominated by fine nitrate concentrations or that fine nitrate formation is overestimated in this run. Since this mechanism aligns with references forming both fine and coarse nitrate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.274"/>, it likely compensates for the lack of coarse nitrate formation through the instantaneous TEQ of gas species in the fine mode, thus not accurately reflecting the size distribution of particles.</p>
      <p id="d2e18818">The formation of coarse nitrate through the irreversible uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on coarse particles (HYB methodologies) is highly sensitive to whether the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is assumed to occur solely on dust or on both dust and sea-salt particles. The uptake solely on dust (HYB_duUPTK run) closely reproduces fine and total particulate nitrate seasonality (correlations of 0.8 and 0.9, respectively), although it slightly overestimates observations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M947" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> bias), particularly over Asia, and overestimates nitrate budgets compared to the literature (1.15 vs. 0.74 Tg on average). An excessively efficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on dust particles could explain such performance, which could be improved through more accurate scaling factors adopted for alkalinity. However, the lack of information in the literature poses a challenge when implementing such adjustments.</p>
      <p id="d2e18904">The introduction of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on sea salt (HYB_du-ssUPTK run) further increases the formation of coarse nitrate, exceeding the reported burdens in the literature (1.75 vs. 0.74 Tg from the average of the references) and overestimating observational surface concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M952" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> bias). Moreover, some deviations with respect to references are observed in the latitude and magnitude of the transatlantic transport of coarse nitrate formed during long-range transport of dust and sea salt. These findings indicate the need for a revision of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M954" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake coefficients on sea salt. A potential alternative could involve its implementation as a function of relative humidity and particle size, aligning it with experimental data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.275"/>, although discrepancies compared to earlier experimental studies present difficulties in determining consistent uptake coefficients for sea salt.</p>
      <p id="d2e18974">The reversible condensation–evaporation of gas species on both fine and coarse modes of dust and sea salt (DBCLL mechanism) highlight the paramount importance of accounting for alkalinity to derive consistent results both globally and across continents. Remarkably, the DBCLL_du-ssAlk run, which accounts for dust and sea-salt alkalinity, effectively captures monthly global concentrations of fine and total nitrate, with correlations of 0.82 and 0.78 and concentrations that are slightly underestimated, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M955" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> bias, respectively. These good results extend to particulate ammonium for both fine and total fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02 and 0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M960" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> bias, respectively). The consistent excessive formation of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M962" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M964" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> bias) over Asia across the experiments may be explained by the absence of anthropogenic coarse dust emissions in the CAMS inventory employed. This omission leads to the overestimation of fine particulate matter formation, compensating for the misrepresentation of coarse particulate matter.</p>
      <p id="d2e19077">Including both dust and sea-salt alkalinity in the DBCLL mechanism significantly raises global pH levels, which enhances particulate nitrate formation by 94 % in comparison to the same mechanism with no alkalinity. This incorporation also reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M966" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets and lowers the reduced nitrogen burden due to an increase in ammonium formation. Moreover, the sole inclusion of sea-salt alkalinity is identified as being responsible for substantially shifting the size partitioning of particulate nitrate from fine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>72 %) to coarse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>63 %), along with the rise in wet deposition of particulate nitrate due to the high scavenging rate of sea-salt particles, overall reducing the total aerosol nitrate atmospheric lifetime from 4.9 to 3.1 d.</p>
      <p id="d2e19105">Comparison with references reveals that while surface concentrations in the DBCLL_du-ssAlk simulation align well with observations, its global burden (1.07 Tg) sits at the upper limit of AeroCom's reported range (0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56 Tg) and slightly exceeds the average reported by other studies (0.74 Tg). Fundamental differences between the models, such as the alkalinity factors, intrinsic differences in the heterogeneous chemistry, aerosol representation, and transport processes, can partly explain the wide range of results reported in the literature. Overall, the DBCLL_du-ssAlk scheme demonstrates the best accuracy compared to the other configurations tested, as evidenced by its closer alignment with observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e19115">A comparison between runs adopting the two different dust alkalinity fractions derived from averaging simulations using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.276"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.277"/> soil mineralogy datasets as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.278"/> reveals that assumptions regarding the dust composition are crucial, particularly influencing the particulate nitrate size distribution. A decrease from 5.17 % to 3.68 % in ionic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions, along with slight increases in Na, K, and Mg between the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.279"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.280"/> mineral datasets, leads to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M971" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 % increase in fine and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 % decrease in coarse nitrate formation. This high sensitivity is especially attributed to the lower calcite content and its different size distribution in the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.281"/> database compared to that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.282"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e19168">It is important to note that our computational cost analysis reveals highly similar processing times across the sensitivity runs, with a standard variation of only 5 %. This is within the estimated variability in the supercomputing resources utilized for the present work. Consequently, the computational cost does not indicate a clear advantage in efficiency for any of the methodologies assessed.</p>
      <p id="d2e19172">This study establishes a crucial benchmark for future investigations into the impact of incorporating regional variations in dust alkalinity, as derived from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.283"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.284"/>, and the upcoming spectroscopically based EMIT surface mineralogical dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.285"/>, on the formation of particulate nitrate and atmospheric composition. The findings also evaluate the significance of dust and sea-salt alkalinity in inorganic aerosol heterogeneous chemistry, providing insights into the optimal representation of dust alkalinity in atmospheric models. Ultimately, these results aim to enhance the ability of atmospheric and climate models to simulate the formation of aerosol nitrate, ammonium, and sulfate, potentially improving our ability to estimate the radiative effects of these species in climate projections.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e19189">The MONARCH code is available at <uri>https://earth.bsc.es/gitlab/es/monarch</uri> (last access: 21 July 2024, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="altparen.286"/>), and the HERMESv3_GR code is accessible at <uri>https://earth.bsc.es/gitlab/es/hermesv3_gr</uri> (last access: 21 July 2024, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="altparen.287"/>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e19207">The GHOST dataset is made freely available via the following repository: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10637449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.10637449</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.288"/>. The model output used in this work is available in the Zenodo data repository at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12789730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.12789730</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx114" id="paren.289"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e19222">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4719-2025-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4719-2025-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e19231">RS, OJ, and CPGP developed the model, designed the methodology and the conceptualization, and performed the investigation and analysis of the results. RS designed and conducted the sensitivity simulations and the postprocessing of the results, as well as validation and visualization, assisted by OJ and CPGP. MGA provided the simulations with the average mineralogy from the mineral dust datasets utilized. DB provided the observational evaluation data and developed the GHOST dataset and the evaluation software. MGV provided the CAMS-ANTv4.2 emission dataset and developed the HERMESv3_GR emission model. RS wrote the paper, which was re-edited by OJ and CPGP, with contributions from all other co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e19237">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e19243">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e19249">We acknowledge support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 821205 (FORCeS) and from the Department of Research and Universities of the Government of Catalonia via the Research Group Atmospheric Composition (grant no. 2021 SGR 01550). The authors also acknowledge the computer resources at Marenostrum and the technical support provided by the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (RES-AECT-2022-3-0013, RES-AECT-2023-2-0008, RES-AECT-2023-3-0026), with special mention to Alejandro García, Carles Tena, Gilbert Montane, and Albert Vila.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e19254">This research was supported by the European Research Council (FRAGMENT, grant no. 773051), the AXA Research Fund (AXA Chair on Sand and Dust Storms at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center), and grant no. PID2022-140365OB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF/EU. Rubén Soussé Villa was funded by the predoctoral program AGAUR-FI ajuts (grant no. 2023 FI-1 01106) Joan Oró, which is backed by the Secretariat of Universities and Research of the Department of Research and Universities of the Generalitat of Catalonia, as well as the European Social Plus Fund.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e19260">This paper was edited by Manish Shrivastava and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adebiyi et al.(2023)Adebiyi, Kok, Murray, Ryder, Stuut, Kahn, Knippertz, Formenti, Mahowald, García-Pando, Klose, Ansmann, Samset, Ito, Balkanski, Biagio, Romanias, Huang, and Meng</label><mixed-citation>Adebiyi, A., Kok, J. F., Murray, B. J., Ryder, C. L., Stuut, J. B. W., Kahn, R. A., Knippertz, P., Formenti, P., Mahowald, N. M., García-Pando, C. P., Klose, M., Ansmann, A., Samset, B. H., Ito, A., Balkanski, Y., Biagio, C. D., Romanias, M. N., Huang, Y., and Meng, J.: A review of coarse mineral dust in the Earth system, Aeolian Res., 60, 100849, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2022.100849" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aeolia.2022.100849</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Adebiyi and Kok(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Adebiyi, A. A. and Kok, J. F.: Climate models miss most of the coarse dust in the atmosphere, Sci. Adv., 6, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Athanasopoulou et al.(2008)Athanasopoulou, Tombrou, Pandis, and Russell</label><mixed-citation>Athanasopoulou, E., Tombrou, M., Pandis, S. N., and Russell, A. G.: The role of sea-salt emissions and heterogeneous chemistry in the air quality of polluted coastal areas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5755–5769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5755-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5755-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Badia et al.(2017)Badia, Jorba, Voulgarakis, Dabdub, García-Pando, Hilboll, Gonçalves, and Janjic</label><mixed-citation>Badia, A., Jorba, O., Voulgarakis, A., Dabdub, D., García-Pando, C. P., Hilboll, A., Gonçalves, M., and Janjic, Z.: Description and evaluation of the Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model (NMMB-MONARCH) version 1.0: gas-phase chemistry at global scale, Geosci. Model Dev, 10, 609–638, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-609-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-609-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bauer et al.(2004)Bauer, Balkanski, Schulz, Hauglustaine, and Dentener</label><mixed-citation>Bauer, S. E., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., and Dentener, F.: Global modeling of heterogeneous chemistry on mineral aerosol surfaces: Influence on tropospheric ozone chemistry and comparison to observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, 2304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003868</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bauer et al.(2007)Bauer, Mishchenko, Lacis, Zhang, Perlwitz, and Metzger</label><mixed-citation>Bauer, S. E., Mishchenko, M. I., Lacis, A. A., Zhang, S., Perlwitz, J., and Metzger, S. M.: Do sulfate and nitrate coatings on mineral dust have important effects on radiative properties and climate modeling?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 6307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006977" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006977</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bauer et al.(2016)Bauer, Tsigaridis, and Miller</label><mixed-citation>Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K., and Miller, R.: Significant atmospheric aerosol pollution caused by world food cultivation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 5394–5400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL068354</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bellouin et al.(2011)Bellouin, Rae, Jones, Johnson, Haywood, and Boucher</label><mixed-citation>Bellouin, N., Rae, J., Jones, A., Johnson, C., Haywood, J., and Boucher, O.: Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D20206,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016074</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Benduhn et al.(2016)Benduhn, Schallock, and Lawrence</label><mixed-citation> Benduhn, F., Schallock, J., and Lawrence, M. G.: Early growth dynamical implications for the steerability of stratospheric solar radiation management via sulfur aerosol particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9956–9963, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bergas‐Massó et al.(2023)Bergas‐Massó, Ageitos, Myriokefalitakis, Miller, van Noije, Sager, Pinto, and García‐Pando</label><mixed-citation>Bergas‐Massó, E., Ageitos, M. G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Miller, R. L., van Noije, T., Sager, P. L., Pinto, G. M., and García‐Pando, C. P.: Pre‐Industrial, Present and Future Atmospheric Soluble Iron Deposition and the Role of Aerosol Acidity and Oxalate Under CMIP6 Emissions, Earth's Future, 11, e2022EF003353, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ef003353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022ef003353</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Betts and Miller(1986)</label><mixed-citation>Betts, A. K. and Miller, M. J.: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and arctic air-mass data sets, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 112, 693–709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/QJ.49711247308" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/QJ.49711247308</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Bian et al.(2009)Bian, Chin, Rodriguez, Yu, Penner, and Strahan</label><mixed-citation>Bian, H., Chin, M., Rodriguez, J. M., Yu, H., Penner, J. E., and Strahan, S.: Sensitivity of aerosol optical thickness and aerosol direct radiative effect to relative humidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2375–2386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-9-2375-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ACP-9-2375-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Bian et al.(2017)Bian, Chin, Hauglustaine, Schulz, Myhre, Bauer, Lund, Karydis, Kucsera, Pan, Pozzer, Skeie, Steenrod, Sudo, Tsigaridis, Tsimpidi, and Tsyro</label><mixed-citation>Bian, H., Chin, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., Schulz, M., Myhre, G., Bauer, S. E., Lund, M. T., Karydis, V. A., Kucsera, T. L., Pan, X., Pozzer, A., Skeie, R. B., Steenrod, S. D., Sudo, K., Tsigaridis, K., Tsimpidi, A. P., and Tsyro, S. G.: Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12911–12940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12911-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-12911-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold, Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,  571–657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Bowdalo et al.(2024)Bowdalo, Basart, Guevara, Jorba, Pérez García-Pando, Jaimes Palomera, Rivera Hernandez, Puchalski, Gay, Klausen, Moreno, Netcheva, and Tarasova</label><mixed-citation>Bowdalo, D., Basart, S., Guevara, M., Jorba, O., Pérez García-Pando, C., Jaimes Palomera, M., Rivera Hernandez, O., Puchalski, M., Gay, D., Klausen, J., Moreno, S., Netcheva, S., and Tarasova, O.: GHOST: a globally harmonised dataset of surface atmospheric composition measurements, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4417–4495, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4417-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-16-4417-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Brodrick et al.(2023)Brodrick, Okin, Ochoa, Thompson, Clark, Ehlmann, Keebler, Miller, Mohawald, Ginoux, Garcia-Pando, Goncalves, and Green</label><mixed-citation>Brodrick, P., Okin, G., Ochoa, F., Thompson, D., Clark, R., Ehlmann, B., Keebler, A., Miller, R., Mohawald, N., Ginoux, P., Garcia-Pando, C., Goncalves, M., and Green, R.: EMIT L3 Aggregated Mineral Spectral Abundance and Uncertainty 0.5 Deg V001,  [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/EMIT/EMITL3ASA.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/EMIT/EMITL3ASA.001</ext-link>,   2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Burkholder et al.(2020)Burkholder, Sander, Abbatt, Barker, Cappa, Crounse, Dibble, Huie, Kolb, Kurylo, Orkin, Percival, Wilmouth, and Wine</label><mixed-citation> Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J. P. D., Barker, J. R., Cappa, C., Crounse, J. D., Dibble, T. S., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Percival, C. J., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P. H.: Chemical kinetics and photochemical data for use in atmospheric studies; evaluation number 19, Pasadena, CA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2020, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Byun(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Byun, D.: Dynamically Consistent Formulations in Meteorological and Air Quality Models for Multiscale Atmospheric Studies, Part I: Governing Equations in a Generalized Coordinate System, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 3789–3807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;3789:DCFIMA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;3789:DCFIMA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Capaldo et al.(2000)Capaldo, Pilinis, and Pandis</label><mixed-citation>Capaldo, K. P., Pilinis, C., and Pandis, S. N.: A computationally efficient hybrid approach for dynamic gas/aerosol transfer in air quality models, Atmos. Environ., 34, 3617–3627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00092-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00092-3</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Chin et al.(2002)Chin, Ginoux, Kinne, Torres, Holben, Duncan, Martin, Logan, Higurashi, and Nakajima</label><mixed-citation>Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B. N., Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Logan, J. A., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.: Tropospheric Aerosol Optical Thickness from the GOCART Model and Comparisons with Satellite and Sun Photometer Measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Claquin et al.(1999)Claquin, Schulz, and Balkanski</label><mixed-citation>Claquin, T., Schulz, M., and Balkanski, Y. J.: Modeling the mineralogy of atmospheric dust sources, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 22243–22256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900416</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Crowley et al.(2010)Crowley, Ammann, Cox, Hynes, Jenkin, Mellouki, Rossi, Troe, and Wallington</label><mixed-citation>Crowley, J. N., Ammann, M., Cox, R. A., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Mellouki, A., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and Wallington, T. J.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume V-heterogeneous reactions on solid substrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 10, 9059–9223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9059-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9059-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Dassios and Pandis(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Dassios, K. G. and Pandis, S. N.: The mass accommodation coefficient of ammonium nitrate aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2993–3003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00079-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00079-5</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Denier van der Gon et al.(2023)Denier van der Gon, Gauss, Granier, Arellano, Benedictow, Darras, Dellaert, Guevara, Jalkanen, Krueger, Kuenen, Liaskoni, Liousse, Markova, Perez, Quack, Simpson, Sindelarova, and Soulie</label><mixed-citation>Denier van der Gon, H., Gauss, M., Granier, C., Arellano, S., Benedictow, A., Darras, S., Dellaert, S., Guevara, M., Jalkanen, J.-P., Krueger, K., Kuenen, J., Liaskoni, M., Liousse, C., Markova, J., Perez, A. P., Quack, B., Simpson, D., Sindelarova, K., and Soulie, A.: Documentation of CAMS emission inventory products,  Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24380/q2si-ti6i" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24380/q2si-ti6i</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Dentener et al.(1996)Dentener, Carmichael, Zhang, Lelieveld, and Crutzen</label><mixed-citation>Dentener, F. J., Carmichael, G. R., Zhang, Y., Lelieveld, J., and Crutzen, P. J.: Role of mineral aerosol as a reactive surface in the global troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 22869–22889, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd01818" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96jd01818</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Ek et al.(2003)Ek, Mitchell, Lin, Rogers, Grunmann, Koren, Gayno, and Tarpley</label><mixed-citation>Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V., Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8851, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003296</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Emanuel and Živković Rothman(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Emanuel, K. A. and Živković Rothman, M.: Development and Evaluation of a Convection Scheme for Use in Climate Models, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1766–1782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;1766:DAEOAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;1766:DAEOAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Fagerli et al.(2015)Fagerli, Tsyro, Simpson, Schulz, Gauss, Jonson, Benedictow, Wind, Ágnes Nyíri, Steensen, Valiyaveetil, Aas, Hjellbrekke, Solberg, Stebel, Tørseth, Yttri, Mareckova, Wankmüller, Pinterits, Ullrich, Posch, van der Gon, Alastuey, and Theys</label><mixed-citation>Fagerli, H., Tsyro, S., Simpson, D., Schulz, M., Gauss, M., Jonson, J. E., Benedictow, A., Wind, P., Ágnes Nyíri, Steensen, B. M., Valiyaveetil, S., Aas, W., Hjellbrekke, A.-G., Solberg, S., Stebel, K., Tørseth, K., Yttri, K. E., Mareckova, K., Wankmüller, R., Pinterits, M., Ullrich, B., Posch, M., van der Gon, H. D., Alastuey, A., and Theys, N.: Transboundary particulate matter, photo-oxidants, acidifying and eutrophying components, EMEP Status Report 2015, <uri>https://emep.int/publ/reports/2015/EMEP_Status_Report_1_2015.pdf</uri> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Fairlie et al.(2010)Fairlie, Jacob, Dibb, Alexander, Avery, van Donkelaar, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Fairlie, T. D., Jacob, D. J., Dibb, J. E., Alexander, B., Avery, M. A., van Donkelaar, A., and Zhang, L.: Impact of mineral dust on nitrate, sulfate, and ozone in transpacific Asian pollution plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3999–4012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3999-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3999-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Feng and Penner(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Y. and Penner, J. E.: Global modeling of nitrate and ammonium: Interaction of aerosols and tropospheric chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D01304,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006404</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Fenter et al.(1995)Fenter, Caloz, and Rossi</label><mixed-citation> Fenter, F. F., Caloz, F., and Rossi, M. J.: Atmospheric, Sci. Ltd, 29, 3365–3372, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Ferrier et al.(2002)Ferrier, Jin, Lin, Black, Rogers, and Dimego</label><mixed-citation> Ferrier, B. S., Jin, Y., Lin, Y., Black, T., Rogers, E., and Dimego, G.: Implementation of a new grid-scale cloud and precipitation scheme in the NCEP Eta model, 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, 12–16 August, San Antonio, Texas, 47241, American Meteorological Society,   280–283, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Foley et al.(2010)Foley, Roselle, Appel, Bhave, Pleim, Otte, Mathur, Sarwar, Young, Gilliam, Nolte, Kelly, Gilliland, and Bash</label><mixed-citation>Foley, K. M., Roselle, S. J., Appel, K. W., Bhave, P. V., Pleim, J. E., Otte, T. L., Mathur, R., Sarwar, G., Young, J. O., Gilliam, R. C., Nolte, C. G., Kelly, J. T., Gilliland, A. B., and Bash, J. O.: Incremental testing of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4.7, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 205–226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-205-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-205-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Fountoukis and Nenes(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIAII: A computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup>–Ca<sup>2+</sup>–Mg<sup>2+</sup>–NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M976" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Na<sup>+</sup>–SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M978" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M979" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Cl<sup>−</sup>–H<sub>2</sub>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Ginoux et al.(2001)Ginoux, Chin, Tegen, Prospero, Holben, Dubovik, and Lin</label><mixed-citation>Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Tegen, I., Prospero, J. M., Holben, B., Dubovik, O., and Lin, S. J.: Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 20255–20273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000053</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Ginoux et al.(2012)Ginoux, Prospero, Gill, Hsu, and Zhao</label><mixed-citation>Ginoux, P., Prospero, J. M., Gill, T. E., Hsu, N. C., and Zhao, M.: Global-scale attribution of anthropogenic and natural dust sources and their emission rates based on MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products, Rev. Geophys., 50, 1–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RG000388" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012RG000388</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Gonçalves Ageitos et al.(2023)Gonçalves Ageitos, Obiso, Miller, Jorba, Klose, Dawson, Balkanski, Perlwitz, Basart, Di Tomaso, Escribano, Macchia, Montané, Mahowald, Green, Thompson, and Pérez García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Obiso, V., Miller, R. L., Jorba, O., Klose, M., Dawson, M., Balkanski, Y., Perlwitz, J., Basart, S., Di Tomaso, E., Escribano, J., Macchia, F., Montané, G., Mahowald, N. M., Green, R. O., Thompson, D. R., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Modeling dust mineralogical composition: sensitivity to soil mineralogy atlases and their expected climate impacts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8623–8657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8623-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-8623-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Goodman(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Goodman, A. L.: A laboratory study of the heterogeneous reaction of nitric acid on calcium carbonate particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 29053–29064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900396" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900396</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Green et al.(2018)Green, Mahowald, Clark, Ehlmann, Ginoux, Kalashnikova, Miller, Okin, Painter, Pérez García-Pando, Realmuto, Swayze, Thompson, Middleton, Guanter, Ben Dor, and Phillips</label><mixed-citation>Green, R. O., Mahowald, N. M., Clark, R. N., Ehlmann, B. L., Ginoux, P. A., Kalashnikova, O. V., Miller, R. L., Okin, G., Painter, T. H., Pérez García-Pando, C., Realmuto, V. J., Swayze, G. A., Thompson, D. R., Middleton, E., Guanter, L., Ben Dor, E., and Phillips, B. R.: NASA’s Earth Surface Mineral Dust Source Investigation, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, vol. 2018, 10–14 December, Washington, D.C.,   A24D–01, <uri>https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AGUFM.A24D..01G</uri> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Guenther et al.(2006)Guenther, Karl, Harley, Wiedinmyer, Palmer, and Geron</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron, C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ACP-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Guerschman et al.(2015)Guerschman, Scarth, McVicar, Renzullo, Malthus, Stewart, Rickards, and Trevithick</label><mixed-citation>Guerschman, J. P., Scarth, P. F., McVicar, T. R., Renzullo, L. J., Malthus, T. J., Stewart, J. B., Rickards, J. E., and Trevithick, R.: Assessing the effects of site heterogeneity and soil properties when unmixing photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil fractions from Landsat and MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 161, 12–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.021</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Guevara et al.(2019)Guevara, Tena, Porquet, Jorba, and García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>Guevara, M., Tena, C., Porquet, M., Jorba, O., and García-Pando, C. P.: HERMESv3, a stand-alone multi-scale atmospheric emission modelling framework-Part 1: Global and regional module, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1885–1907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/GMD-12-1885-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/GMD-12-1885-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Guevara et al.(2021)Guevara, Jorba, Tena, Denier van der Gon, Kuenen, Elguindi, Darras, Granier, and Pérez García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>Guevara, M., Jorba, O., Tena, C., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J., Elguindi, N., Darras, S., Granier, C., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service TEMPOral profiles (CAMS-TEMPO): global and European emission temporal profile maps for atmospheric chemistry modelling, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 367–404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-367-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-13-367-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Guimbaud et al.(2002)Guimbaud, Arens, Gutzwiller, Gäggeler, and Ammann</label><mixed-citation>Guimbaud, C., Arens, F., Gutzwiller, L., Gäggeler, H. W., and Ammann, M.: Uptake of HNO<sub>3</sub> to deliquescent sea-salt particles: A study using the short-lived radioactive isotope tracer <sup>13</sup>N, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2, 249–257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2-249-2002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2-249-2002</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Hanisch and Crowley(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Hanisch, F. and Crowley, J. N.: The heterogeneous reactivity of gaseous nitric acid on authentic mineral dust samples, and on individual mineral and clay mineral components, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 3, 2474–2482, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b101700o" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b101700o</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Hanisch and Crowley(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Hanisch, F. and Crowley, J. N.: Heterogeneous reactivity of NO and HNO3 on mineral dust in the presence of ozone, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 883–887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b211503d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b211503d</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Hauglustaine et al.(2014)Hauglustaine, Balkanski, and Schulz</label><mixed-citation>Hauglustaine, D. A., Balkanski, Y., and Schulz, M.: A global model simulation of present and future nitrate aerosols and their direct radiative forcing of climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11031–11063, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11031-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11031-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Herich et al.(2009)Herich, Tritscher, Wiacek, Gysel, Weingartner, Lohmann, Baltensperger, and Cziczo</label><mixed-citation>Herich, H., Tritscher, T., Wiacek, A., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., Lohmann, U., Baltensperger, U., and Cziczo, D. J.: Water uptake of clay and desert dust aerosol particles at sub- and supersaturated water vapor conditions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 7804–7809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b901585j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b901585j</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Hersbach et al.(2023)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Biavati, Horányi, Muñoz Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Rozum, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Dee, and Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present, Climate Data Store, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Hodzic et al.(2006)Hodzic, Bessagnet, and Vautard</label><mixed-citation>Hodzic, A., Bessagnet, B., and Vautard, R.: A model evaluation of coarse-mode nitrate heterogeneous formation on dust particles, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4158–4171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.015</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Hsu et al.(2004)Hsu, Tsay, King, and Herman</label><mixed-citation>Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S.-C., King, M. D., and Herman, J. R.: Aerosol properties over bright-reflecting source regions, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 42, 557–569, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Iacono et al.(2008)Iacono, Delamere, Mlawer, Shephard, Clough, and Collins</label><mixed-citation>Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 13103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009944</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Jacob(2000)</label><mixed-citation> Jacob, D. J.: Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Jaeglé et al.(2011)Jaeglé, Quinn, Bates, Alexander, and Lin</label><mixed-citation>Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B., and Lin, J. T.: Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: New constraints from in situ and remote sensing observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3137–3157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-11-3137-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ACP-11-3137-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Janjic(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Janjic, Z.: Nonlinear Advection Schemes and Energy Cascade on Semi-Staggered Grids, AMS, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112&lt;1234:NASAEC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112&lt;1234:NASAEC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Janjic and Gall(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Janjic, Z. and Gall, R.: Scientific Documentation of the NCEP Nonhydrostatic Multiscale Model on the B grid (NMMB), Part 1: Dynamics, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6WH2MZX" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5065/D6WH2MZX</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Janjic(1996)</label><mixed-citation> Janjic, Z. I.: The Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 turbulence closure scheme in the NCEP Eta Model, American Meteorological Society, 354–355, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Janjić(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Janjić, Z. I.: Comments on “Development and Evaluation of a Convection Scheme for Use in Climate Models”, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3686–3686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3686:CODAEO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3686:CODAEO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Janjić(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Janjić, Z. I.: Nonsingular Implementation of the Mellor-Yamada Level 2.5 Scheme in the NCEP Meso model, NCEP Office Note; 437, <uri>https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/11409</uri> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Jones et al.(2021)Jones, Hill, Remy, Abraham, Dalvi, Hardacre, Hewitt, Johnson, Mulcahy, and Turnock</label><mixed-citation>Jones, A. C., Hill, A., Remy, S., Abraham, N. L., Dalvi, M., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Johnson, B., Mulcahy, J. P., and Turnock, S. T.: Exploring the sensitivity of atmospheric nitrate concentrations to nitric acid uptake rate using the Met Office's Unified Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15901–15927, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Jorba et al.(2012)Jorba, Dabdub, Blaszczak-Boxe, Pérez, Janjic, Baldasano, Spada, Badia, and Gonçalves</label><mixed-citation>Jorba, O., Dabdub, D., Blaszczak-Boxe, C., Pérez, C., Janjic, Z., Baldasano, J. M., Spada, M., Badia, A., and Gonçalves, M.: Potential significance of photoexcited NO<sub>2</sub> on global air quality with the NMMB/BSC chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 13301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017730</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Jordan et al.(2003)Jordan, Dibb, Anderson, and Fuelberg</label><mixed-citation>Jordan, C. E., Dibb, J. E., Anderson, B. E., and Fuelberg, H. E.: Uptake of nitrate and sulfate on dust aerosols during TRACE-P, J. Geophys. Res., 108,   8817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003101</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Journet et al.(2014)Journet, Balkanski, and Harrison</label><mixed-citation>Journet, E., Balkanski, Y., and Harrison, S. P.: A new data set of soil mineralogy for dust-cycle modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3801–3816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-14-3801-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ACP-14-3801-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Kaiser et al.(2012)Kaiser, Heil, Andreae, Benedetti, Chubarova, Jones, Morcrette, Razinger, Schultz, Suttie, and Werf</label><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones, L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., and Werf, G. R. V. D.: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences, 9, 527–554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-527-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Karydis et al.(2016)Karydis, Tsimpidi, Pozzer, Astitha, and Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Pozzer, A., Astitha, M., and Lelieveld, J.: Effects of mineral dust on global atmospheric nitrate concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1491–1509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1491-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1491-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Karydis et al.(2021)Karydis, Tsimpidi, Pozzer, and Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Pozzer, A., and Lelieveld, J.: How alkaline compounds control atmospheric aerosol particle acidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 21, 14983–15001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14983-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-14983-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Klose et al.(2021)Klose, Jorba, Ageitos, Escribano, Dawson, Obiso, Tomaso, Basart, Pinto, Macchia, Ginoux, Guerschman, Prigent, Huang, Kok, Miller, and García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>Klose, M., Jorba, O., Ageitos, M. G., Escribano, J., Dawson, M. L., Obiso, V., Tomaso, E. D., Basart, S., Pinto, G. M., Macchia, F., Ginoux, P., Guerschman, J., Prigent, C., Huang, Y., Kok, J. F., Miller, R. L., and García-Pando, C. P.: Mineral dust cycle in the Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model (MONARCH) Version 2.0, Geosci. Model Dev, 14, 6403–6444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6403-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-6403-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Krueger et al.(2003)Krueger, Grassian, Laskin, and Cowin</label><mixed-citation>Krueger, B. J., Grassian, V. H., Laskin, A., and Cowin, J. P.: The transformation of solid atmospheric particles into liquid droplets through heterogeneous chemistry: Laboratory insights into the processing of calcium containing mineral dust aerosol in the troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016563</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Krueger et al.(2004)Krueger, Grassian, Cowin, and Laskin</label><mixed-citation>Krueger, B. J., Grassian, V. H., Cowin, J. P., and Laskin, A.: Heterogeneous chemistry of individual mineral dust particles from different dust source regions: The importance of particle mineralogy, Atmos. Environ., 38, 6253–6261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.010</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Lana et al.(2011)Lana, Bell, Simó, Vallina, Ballabrera-Poy, Kettle, Dachs, Bopp, Saltzman, Stefels, Johnson, and Liss</label><mixed-citation>Lana, A., Bell, T. G., Simó, R., Vallina, S. M., Ballabrera-Poy, J., Kettle, A. J., Dachs, J., Bopp, L., Saltzman, E. S., Stefels, J., Johnson, J. E., and Liss, P. S.: An updated climatology of surface dimethlysulfide concentrations and emission fluxes in the global ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB1004, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003850</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Li et al.(2012)Li, Wang, Zhuang, Luo, Sun, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Wang, Z., Zhuang, G., Luo, G., Sun, Y., and Wang, Q.: Mixing of Asian mineral dust with anthropogenic pollutants over East Asia: A model case study of a super-duststorm in March 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7591–7607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7591-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7591-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Li and Shao(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Li, W. J. and Shao, L. Y.: Observation of nitrate coatings on atmospheric mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1863–1871, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1863-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1863-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Li et al.(2024)Li, Yu, Yue, Liu, Huang, Chi, Nie, Ding, Dong, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Li, X., Yu, Z., Yue, M., Liu, Y., Huang, K., Chi, X., Nie, W., Ding, A., Dong, X., and Wang, M.: Impact of mineral dust photocatalytic heterogeneous chemistry on the formation of the sulfate and nitrate: A modelling study over East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 316, 120166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120166" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120166</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Li et al.(2016)Li, Schichtel, Walker, Schwede, Chen, Lehmann, Puchalski, Gay, and Collett</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Schichtel, B. A., Walker, J. T., Schwede, D. B., Chen, X., Lehmann, C. M., Puchalski, M. A., Gay, D. A., and Collett, J. L.: Increasing importance of deposition of reduced nitrogen in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5874–5879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525736113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1525736113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Liao et al.(2003)Liao, Adams, Chung, Seinfeld, Mickley, and Jacob</label><mixed-citation>Liao, H., Adams, P. J., Chung, S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Mickley, L. J., and Jacob, D. J.: Interactions between tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in a unified general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,  4001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001260" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd001260</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Liu and Abbatt(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, T. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidation of sulfur dioxide by nitrogen dioxide accelerated at the interface of deliquesced aerosol particles, Nat. Chem.,  13, 1173–1177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Liu et al.(2007)Liu, P., Wang, and Laskin</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., P., C. J., Wang, H., and Laskin, A.: Kinetic Study of Heterogeneous Reaction of Deliquesced NaCl Particles with Gaseous HNO<sub>3</sub>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 10026–10043, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Liu et al.(2008)Liu, Gibson, Cain, Wang, Grassian, and Laskin</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Gibson, E. R., Cain, J. P., Wang, H., Grassian, V. H., and Laskin, A.: Kinetics of heterogeneous reaction of CaCO<sub>3</sub> particles with gaseous HNO3 over a wide range of humidity, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 1561–1571, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp076169h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp076169h</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Liu et al.(2022)Liu, Zhan, Zheng, Song, Zhang, Ma, Hua, Xie, Bao, Yan, Bianchi, Petäjä, Ding, Song, He, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Zhan, J., Zheng, F., Song, B., Zhang, Y., Ma, W., Hua, C., Xie, J., Bao, X., Yan, C., Bianchi, F., Petäjä, T., Ding, A., Song, Y., He, H., and Kulmala, M.: Dust emission reduction enhanced gas-to-particle conversion of ammonia in the North China Plain, Nat. Commun., 13, 6887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34733-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-022-34733-4</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Luo et al.(2019)Luo, Yu, and Schwab</label><mixed-citation>Luo, G., Yu, F., and Schwab, J.: Revised treatment of wet scavenging processes dramatically improves GEOS-Chem 12.0.0 simulations of surface nitric acid, nitrate, and ammonium over the United States, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3439–3447, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3439-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-3439-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Lurmann et al.(1997)Lurmann, Wexler, Pandis, Musarra, Kumar, and Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>Lurmann, F. W., Wexler, A. S., Pandis, S. N., Musarra, S., Kumar, N., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Modelling urban and regional aerosols – II. Application to California's South Coast Air Basin, Atmos. Environ., 31, 2695–2715, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00100-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00100-3</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Ma et al.(2021)Ma, Zhong, Ma, Ye, Zhao, Liu, Zhang, Chen, Liu, Chu, and He</label><mixed-citation> Ma, Q., Zhong, C., Ma, J., Ye, C., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, P., Chen, T., Liu, C., Chu, B., and He, H.: Comprehensive Study about the Photolysis of Nitrates on Mineral Oxides, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 8604–8612, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Mahowald et al.(2014)Mahowald, Albani, Kok, Engelstaeder, Scanza, Ward, and Flanner</label><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N., Albani, S., Kok, J. F., Engelstaeder, S., Scanza, R., Ward, D. S., and Flanner, M. G.: The size distribution of desert dust aerosols and its impact on the Earth system, Aeolian Res., 15, 53–71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Mashburn et al.(2006)Mashburn, Frinak, and Tolbert</label><mixed-citation>Mashburn, C. D., Frinak, E. K., and Tolbert, M. A.: Heterogeneous uptake of nitric acid on Na-montmorillonite clay as a function of relative humidity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D15213,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006525</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Meng and Seinfeld(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Meng, Z. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Time scales to achieve atmospheric gas-aerosol equilibrium for volatile species, Atmos. Environ., 30, 2889–2900, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00493-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(95)00493-9</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Metzger et al.(2002)Metzger, Dentener, Pandis, and Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>Metzger, S., Dentener, F., Pandis, S., and Lelieveld, J.: Gas/aerosol partitioning: 1. A computationally efficient model, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001102</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Milousis et al.(2024)Milousis, Tsimpidi, Tost, Pandis, Nenes, Kiendler-Scharr, and Karydis</label><mixed-citation>Milousis, A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Tost, H., Pandis, S. N., Nenes, A., Kiendler-Scharr, A., and Karydis, V. A.: Implementation of the ISORROPIA-lite aerosol thermodynamics model into the EMAC chemistry climate model (based on MESSy v2.55): implications for aerosol composition and acidity, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1111–1131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1111-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-17-1111-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Connolly, P., Benz, S., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Cotton, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3007–3021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Monin and Obukhov(1954)</label><mixed-citation> Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere, in: Tr. Akad. Nauk SSSR Geophiz. Inst, Vol. 24,   163–187, 1954.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Myhre et al.(2006)Myhre, Grini, and Metzger</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Grini, A., and Metzger, S.: Modelling of nitrate and ammonium-containing aerosols in presence of sea salt, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4809–4821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4809-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4809-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Navarro-Barboza et al.(2024)Navarro-Barboza, Pandolfi, Guevara, Enciso, Tena, Via, Yus-Díez, Reche, Pérez, Alastuey, Querol, and Jorba</label><mixed-citation>Navarro-Barboza, H., Pandolfi, M., Guevara, M., Enciso, S., Tena, C., Via, M., Yus-Díez, J., Reche, C., Pérez, N., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., and Jorba, O.: Uncertainties in source allocation of carbonaceous aerosols in a Mediterranean region, Environ. Int., 183, 108252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108252" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2023.108252</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Nenes et al.(1998)Nenes, Pandis, and Pilinis</label><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A New Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model for Multiphase Multicomponent Inorganic Aerosols, Aquat. Geochem.,  4, 123–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1009604003981</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Pai et al.(2020)Pai, Heald, Pierce, Farina, Marais, Jimenez, Campuzano-Jost, Nault, Middlebrook, Coe, Shilling, Bahreini, Dingle, and Vu</label><mixed-citation>Pai, S. J., Heald, C. L., Pierce, J. R., Farina, S. C., Marais, E. A., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Middlebrook, A. M., Coe, H., Shilling, J. E., Bahreini, R., Dingle, J. H., and Vu, K.: An evaluation of global organic aerosol schemes using airborne observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2637–2665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Paulot et al.(2016)Paulot, Ginoux, Cooke, Donner, Fan, Lin, Mao, Naik, and Horowitz</label><mixed-citation>Paulot, F., Ginoux, P., Cooke, W. F., Donner, L. J., Fan, S., Lin, M.-Y., Mao, J., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.: Sensitivity of nitrate aerosols to ammonia emissions and to nitrate chemistry: implications for present and future nitrate optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 16, 1459–1477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1459-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1459-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Phadnis and Carmichael(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Phadnis, M. J. and Carmichael, G. R.: Numerical investigation of the influence of mineral dust on the tropospheric chemistry of east Asia, J. Atmos. Chem., 36, 285–323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006391626069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1006391626069</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Pratte and Rossi(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Pratte, P. and Rossi, M. J.: Nitric acid uptake on NaCl and sea salt aerosol at relative humidities in the range 2.8 to 25 % at ambient temperature, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2053.4562" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13140/2.1.2053.4562</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Prince et al.(2007)Prince, Kleiber, Grassian, and Young</label><mixed-citation>Prince, A. P., Kleiber, P., Grassian, V. H., and Young, M. A.: Heterogeneous interactions of calcite aerosol with sulfur dioxide and sulfur dioxide–nitric acid mixtures, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9, 3432–3439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B703296J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B703296J</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Pringle et al.(2010)Pringle, Tost, Message, Steil, Giannadaki, Nenes, Fountoukis, Stier, Vignati, and Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>Pringle, K. J., Tost, H., Message, S., Steil, B., Giannadaki, D., Nenes, A., Fountoukis, C., Stier, P., Vignati, E., and Lelieveld, J.: Description and evaluation of GMXe: A new aerosol submodel for global simulations (v1), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 391–412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-391-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-391-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Pérez et al.(2011)Pérez, Haustein, Janjic, Jorba, Huneeus, Baldasano, Black, Basart, Nickovic, Miller, Perlwitz, Schulz, and Thomson</label><mixed-citation>Pérez, C., Haustein, K., Janjic, Z., Jorba, O., Huneeus, N., Baldasano, J. M., Black, T., Basart, S., Nickovic, S., Miller, R. L., Perlwitz, J. P., Schulz, M., and Thomson, M.: Atmospheric dust modeling from meso to global scales with the online NMMB/BSC-Dust model – Part 1: Model description, annual simulations and evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13001–13027, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13001-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-13001-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Raupach et al.(1993)Raupach, Gillette, and Leys</label><mixed-citation> Raupach, M. R., Gillette, D. A., and Leys, J. F.: The effect of roughness elements on wind erosion threshold, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 3023–3029,  1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Rea(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Rea, D. K.: The paleoclimatic record provided by eolian deposition in the deep sea: The geologic history of wind, Rev. Geophys., 32, 159–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG03257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93RG03257</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Riemer et al.(2003)Riemer, Vogel, Vogel, Schell, Ackermann, Kessler, and Hass</label><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., Schell, B., Ackermann, I., Kessler, C., and Hass, H.: Impact of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> on chemistry and nitrate aerosol formation in the lower troposphere under photosmog conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002436" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002436</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Riemer et al.(2019)Riemer, Ault, West, Craig, and Curtis</label><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57, 187–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018RG000615</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Rémy et al.(2019)Rémy, Kipling, Flemming, Boucher, Nabat, Michou, Bozzo, Ades, Huijnen, Benedetti, Engelen, Peuch, and Morcrette</label><mixed-citation>Rémy, S., Kipling, Z., Flemming, J., Boucher, O., Nabat, P., Michou, M., Bozzo, A., Ades, M., Huijnen, V., Benedetti, A., Engelen, R., Peuch, V.-H., and Morcrette, J.-J.: Description and evaluation of the tropospheric aerosol scheme in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS-AER, cycle 45R1), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4627–4659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4627-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-4627-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Rémy et al.(2022)Rémy, Kipling, Huijnen, Flemming, Nabat, Michou, Ades, Engelen, and Peuch</label><mixed-citation>Rémy, S., Kipling, Z., Huijnen, V., Flemming, J., Nabat, P., Michou, M., Ades, M., Engelen, R., and Peuch, V. H.: Description and evaluation of the tropospheric aerosol scheme in the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS-AER, cycle 47R1) of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4881–4912, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4881-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-4881-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Saul et al.(2006)Saul, Tolocka, and Johnston</label><mixed-citation>Saul, T. D., Tolocka, M. P., and Johnston, M. V.: Reactive uptake of nitric acid onto sodium chloride aerosols across a wide range of relative humidities, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 7614–7620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp060639a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp060639a</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Schwartz(1986)</label><mixed-citation> Schwartz, S. E.: Mass-Transport Considerations Pertinent to Aqueous Phase Reactions of Gases in Liquid-Water Clouds,   415–471, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642-70627-1, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Seinfeld, J. and Pandis, S.: Atmos. Chem. Phys.: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd Edn., <uri>https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1345321</uri> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmos. Chem. Phys.: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 40, 26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1999.10544295" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00139157.1999.10544295</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Semeniuk and Dastoor(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Semeniuk, K. and Dastoor, A.: Current state of atmospheric aerosol thermodynamics and mass transfer modeling: A review, Atmosphere, 11, 1–71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos11020156</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Song and Carmichael(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Song, C. H. and Carmichael, G. R.: A three-dimensional modeling investigation of the evolution processes of dust and sea-salt particles in east Asia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 18131–18154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900352" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900352</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Song et al.(2007)Song, Kim, Lee, Carmichael, Lee, and Lee</label><mixed-citation>Song, C. H., Kim, C. M., Lee, Y. J., Carmichael, G. R., Lee, B. K., and Lee, D. S.: An evaluation of reaction probabilities of sulfate and nitrate precursors onto East Asian dust particles, J. Geophys. Res, 112, 18206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008092</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Song et al.(2018)Song, Gao, Xu, Shao, Shi, Wang, Wang, Sun, and McElroy</label><mixed-citation>Song, S., Gao, M., Xu, W., Shao, J., Shi, G., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Sun, Y., and McElroy, M. B.: Fine-particle pH for Beijing winter haze as inferred from different thermodynamic equilibrium models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7423–7438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7423-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7423-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Soulie et al.(2024)Soulie, Granier, Darras, Zilbermann, Doumbia, Guevara, Jalkanen, Keita, Liousse, Crippa, Guizzardi, Hoesly, and Smith</label><mixed-citation>Soulie, A., Granier, C., Darras, S., Zilbermann, N., Doumbia, T., Guevara, M., Jalkanen, J. P., Keita, S., Liousse, C., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Hoesly, R., and Smith, S. J.: Global anthropogenic emissions (CAMS-GLOB-ANT) for the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service simulations of air quality forecasts and reanalyses, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2261–2279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ESSD-16-2261-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ESSD-16-2261-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Sousse(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Sousse, R.: “A Comprehensive Global Modelling Assessment of Nitrate Heterogeneous Formation on Desert Dust”: Column loads monthly means per species, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12789730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.12789730</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Spada(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Spada, M.: Development and evaluation of an atmospheric aerosol module implemented within the NMMB/BSC-CTM, Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, <uri>http://hdl.handle.net/2117/95991</uri> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Spada et al.(2013)Spada, Jorba, García-Pando, Janjic, and Baldasano</label><mixed-citation>Spada, M., Jorba, O., García-Pando, C. P., Janjic, Z., and Baldasano, J. M.: Modeling and evaluation of the global sea-salt aerosol distribution: Sensitivity to emission schemes and resolution effects at coastal/orographic sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11735–11755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-13-11735-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ACP-13-11735-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Sulprizio(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Sulprizio, M.: Chemistry instability introduced by ISORROPIA v2.2, <uri>http://wiki.seas.harvard.edu/geos-chem/index.php/ISORROPIA_II#Chemistry_instability_introduced_by_ISORROPIA_v2.2</uri> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Suman et al.(2024)Suman, Zanini, Vulpio, and Pinelli</label><mixed-citation>Suman, A., Zanini, N., Vulpio, A., and Pinelli, M.: Apparatus and methods for the calibration and correction of a polydispersed dust feeding system applied in multiphase flow experiments, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 151, 111074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.111074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.111074</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx119"><label>Thompson et al.(2024)Thompson, Green, Bradley, Brodrick, Mahowald, Ben-Dor, Bennett, Bernas, Carmon, Chadwick, Clark, Coleman, Cox, Diaz, Eastwood, Eckert, Ehlmann, Ginoux, Gonçalves Ageitos, and Zandbergen</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, D., Green, R., Bradley, C., Brodrick, P., Mahowald, N., Ben-Dor, E., Bennett, M., Bernas, M., Carmon, N., Chadwick, K. D., Clark, R., Coleman, R., Cox, E., Diaz, E., Eastwood, M., Eckert, R., Ehlmann, B., Ginoux, P., Gonçalves Ageitos, M., and Zandbergen, S.: On-orbit calibration and performance of the EMIT imaging spectrometer, Remote Sens. Environ., 303, 113986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113986" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2023.113986</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx120"><label>Tolocka et al.(2004)Tolocka, Saul, and Johnston</label><mixed-citation>Tolocka, M. P., Saul, T. D., and Johnston, M. V.: Reactive Uptake of Nitric Acid into Aqueous Sodium Chloride Droplets Using Real-Time Single-Particle Mass Spectrometry, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108, 2659–2665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp036612y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp036612y</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx121"><label>Trump et al.(2015)Trump, Fountoukis, Donahue, and Pandis</label><mixed-citation>Trump, E. R., Fountoukis, C., Donahue, N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: Improvement of simulation of fine inorganic PM levels through better descriptions of coarse particle chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 102, 274–281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.059</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx122"><label>Uno et al.(2020)Uno, Wang, Itahashi, Yumimoto, Yamamura, Yoshino, Takami, Hayasaki, and Kim</label><mixed-citation>Uno, I., Wang, Z., Itahashi, S., Yumimoto, K., Yamamura, Y., Yoshino, A., Takami, A., Hayasaki, M., and Kim, B.-G. G.: Paradigm shift in aerosol chemical composition over regions downwind of China, Sci. Rep., 10, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63592-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-63592-6</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx123"><label>Usher et al.(2002)Usher, Al-Hosney, Carlos-Cuellar, and Grassian</label><mixed-citation>Usher, C. R., Al-Hosney, H., Carlos-Cuellar, S., and Grassian, V. H.: A laboratory study of the heterogeneous uptake and oxidation of sulfur dioxide on mineral dust particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4713, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002051</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx124"><label>Usher et al.(2003)Usher, Michel, and Grassian</label><mixed-citation>Usher, C. R., Michel, A. E., and Grassian, V. H.: Reactions on Mineral Dust, Chem. Rev., 103, 4883–4939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020657y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr020657y</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx125"><label>Vignati et al.(2004)Vignati, Wilson, and Stier</label><mixed-citation>Vignati, E., Wilson, J., and Stier, P.: M7: An efficient size-resolved aerosol microphysics module for large-scale aerosol transport models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109,  D22202,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004485" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004485</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx126"><label>Vlasenko et al.(2006)Vlasenko, Sjogren, Weingartner, Stemmler, Gäggeler, and Ammann</label><mixed-citation>Vlasenko, A., Sjogren, S., Weingartner, E., Stemmler, K., Gäggeler, H. W., and Ammann, M.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Effect of humidity on nitric acid uptake to mineral dust aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2147-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-2147-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx127"><label>Vlasenko et al.(2009)Vlasenko, Huthwelker, Gäggeler, and Ammann</label><mixed-citation>Vlasenko, A., Huthwelker, T., Gäggeler, H. W., and Ammann, M.: Kinetics of the heterogeneous reaction of nitric acid with mineral dust particles: An aerosol flowtube study, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 7921–7930, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b904290n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b904290n</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx128"><label>Wang et al.(2017)Wang, Pan, Uno, Li, Wang, Chen, Fu, Yang, Kobayashi, Shimizu, Sugimoto, and Yamamoto</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Pan, X., Uno, I., Li, J., Wang, Z., Chen, X., Fu, P., Yang, T., Kobayashi, H., Shimizu, A., Sugimoto, N., and Yamamoto, S.: Significant impacts of heterogeneous reactions on the chemical composition and mixing state of dust particles: A case study during dust events over northern China, Atmos. Environ., 159, 83–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.044</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx129"><label>Wei(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Wei, C.: Modeling the effects of heterogeneous reactions on atmospheric Modeling the effects of heterogeneous reactions on atmospheric chemistry and aerosol properties chemistry and aerosol properties, Ph.D. thesis, University of Iowa, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.2xewzpnz" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17077/etd.2xewzpnz</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx130"><label>Wesely(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Wesely, M.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx131"><label>Wexler and Seinfeld(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Wexler, A. S. and Seinfeld, J. H.: The distribution of ammonium salts among a size and composition dispersed aerosol, Atmos. Environ. Pt. A., 24, 1231–1246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90088-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0960-1686(90)90088-5</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx132"><label>Whitten et al.(2010)Whitten, Heo, Kimura, McDonald-Buller, Allen, Carter, and Yarwood</label><mixed-citation>Whitten, G. Z., Heo, G., Kimura, Y., McDonald-Buller, E., Allen, D. T., Carter, W. P., and Yarwood, G.: A new condensed toluene mechanism for Carbon Bond: CB05-TU, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5346–5355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2009.12.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2009.12.029</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx133"><label>Wild et al.(2000)Wild, Zhu, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>Wild, O., Zhu, X., and Prather, M. J.: Fast-J: Accurate Simulation of In- and Below-Cloud Photolysis in Tropospheric Chemical Models, J. Atmos. Chem., 37, 245–282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006415919030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1006415919030</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx134"><label>Yarwood et al.(2005)Yarwood, Rao, Yocke, and Whitten</label><mixed-citation>Yarwood, G., Rao, S., Yocke, M., and Whitten, G. Z.: Updates to the carbon bond chemical mechanism: CB05 final report to the US EPA, RT-0400675, <uri>https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162-3417</uri> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx135"><label>Yu et al.(2017)Yu, Jang, and Park</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Z., Jang, M., and Park, J.: Modeling atmospheric mineral aerosol chemistry to predict heterogeneous photooxidation of SO<sub>2</sub>, 17, 10001–10017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10001-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10001-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx136"><label>Yue et al.(2022)Yue, Cheng, Lee, Stocker, He, Yao, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Yue, Y., Cheng, J., Lee, K. S., Stocker, R., He, X., Yao, M., and Wang, J.: Effects of relative humidity on heterogeneous reaction of SO<sub>2</sub> with CaCO<sub>3</sub> particles and formation of CaSO<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M993" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2H<sub>2</sub>O crystal as secondary aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 268, 118776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2021.118776" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2021.118776</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx137"><label>Zakoura and Pandis(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Zakoura, M. and Pandis, S. N.: Overprediction of aerosol nitrate by chemical transport models: The role of grid resolution, Atmos. Environ., 187, 390–400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.066</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx138"><label>Zaveri et al.(2008)Zaveri, Easter, Fast, and Peters</label><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.: Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008782</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx139"><label>Zaveri et al.(2021)Zaveri, Easter, Singh, Wang, Lu, Tilmes, Emmons, Vitt, Zhang, Liu, Ghan, and Rasch</label><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Singh, B., Wang, H., Lu, Z., Tilmes, S., Emmons, L. K., Vitt, F., Zhang, R., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.: Development and Evaluation of Chemistry-Aerosol-Climate Model CAM5-Chem-MAM7-MOSAIC: Global Atmospheric Distribution and Radiative Effects of Nitrate Aerosol, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020MS002346</ext-link>, 2021. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx140"><label>Zhai et al.(2023)Zhai, Jacob, Pendergrass, Colombi, Shah, Yang, Zhang, Wang, Kim, Sun, Choi, Park, Luo, Yu, Woo, Kim, Dibb, Lee, Han, Anderson, Li, and Liao</label><mixed-citation>Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Pendergrass, D. C., Colombi, N. K., Shah, V., Yang, L. H., Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Kim, H., Sun, Y., Choi, J.-S., Park, J.-S., Luo, G., Yu, F., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y., Dibb, J. E., Lee, T., Han, J.-S., Anderson, B. E., Li, K., and Liao, H.: Coarse particulate matter air quality in East Asia: implications for fine particulate nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4271–4281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4271-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-4271-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx141"><label>Zilitinkevich(1965)</label><mixed-citation> Zilitinkevich, S. S.: Bulk characteristics of turbulence in the atmospheric planetary boundary layer,   Trudy GGO,  167, 49–52, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>A comprehensive global modeling assessment of nitrate heterogeneous formation on desert dust</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adebiyi et al.(2023)Adebiyi, Kok, Murray, Ryder, Stuut, Kahn,
Knippertz, Formenti, Mahowald, García-Pando, Klose, Ansmann, Samset, Ito,
Balkanski, Biagio, Romanias, Huang, and Meng</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adebiyi, A., Kok, J. F., Murray, B. J., Ryder, C. L., Stuut, J. B. W., Kahn,
R. A., Knippertz, P., Formenti, P., Mahowald, N. M., García-Pando, C. P.,
Klose, M., Ansmann, A., Samset, B. H., Ito, A., Balkanski, Y., Biagio, C. D.,
Romanias, M. N., Huang, Y., and Meng, J.: A review of coarse mineral dust in
the Earth system, Aeolian Res., 60, 100849, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2022.100849" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2022.100849</a>,
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Adebiyi and Kok(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adebiyi, A. A. and Kok, J. F.: Climate models miss most of the coarse dust in
the atmosphere, Sci. Adv., 6, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Athanasopoulou et al.(2008)Athanasopoulou, Tombrou, Pandis, and
Russell</label><mixed-citation>
      
Athanasopoulou, E., Tombrou, M., Pandis, S. N., and Russell, A. G.: The role of
sea-salt emissions and heterogeneous chemistry in the air quality of polluted
coastal areas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5755–5769,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5755-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5755-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Badia et al.(2017)Badia, Jorba, Voulgarakis, Dabdub, García-Pando,
Hilboll, Gonçalves, and Janjic</label><mixed-citation>
      
Badia, A., Jorba, O., Voulgarakis, A., Dabdub, D., García-Pando, C. P.,
Hilboll, A., Gonçalves, M., and Janjic, Z.: Description and evaluation of
the Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model
(NMMB-MONARCH) version 1.0: gas-phase chemistry at global scale, Geosci.
Model Dev, 10, 609–638, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-609-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-609-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bauer et al.(2004)Bauer, Balkanski, Schulz, Hauglustaine, and
Dentener</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bauer, S. E., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., and Dentener, F.:
Global modeling of heterogeneous chemistry on mineral aerosol surfaces:
Influence on tropospheric ozone chemistry and comparison to observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, 2304,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003868</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bauer et al.(2007)Bauer, Mishchenko, Lacis, Zhang, Perlwitz, and
Metzger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bauer, S. E., Mishchenko, M. I., Lacis, A. A., Zhang, S., Perlwitz, J., and
Metzger, S. M.: Do sulfate and nitrate coatings on mineral dust have
important effects on radiative properties and climate modeling?, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 6307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006977" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006977</a>,
2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bauer et al.(2016)Bauer, Tsigaridis, and Miller</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K., and Miller, R.: Significant atmospheric aerosol
pollution caused by world food cultivation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43,
5394–5400, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068354" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068354</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bellouin et al.(2011)Bellouin, Rae, Jones, Johnson, Haywood, and
Boucher</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bellouin, N., Rae, J., Jones, A., Johnson, C., Haywood, J., and Boucher, O.:
Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)
simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D20206,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Benduhn et al.(2016)Benduhn, Schallock, and Lawrence</label><mixed-citation>
      
Benduhn, F., Schallock, J., and Lawrence, M. G.: Early growth dynamical
implications for the steerability of stratospheric solar radiation management
via sulfur aerosol particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9956–9963,
2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bergas‐Massó et al.(2023)Bergas‐Massó, Ageitos,
Myriokefalitakis, Miller, van Noije, Sager, Pinto, and
García‐Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bergas‐Massó, E., Ageitos, M. G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Miller, R. L., van
Noije, T., Sager, P. L., Pinto, G. M., and García‐Pando, C. P.:
Pre‐Industrial, Present and Future Atmospheric Soluble Iron Deposition and
the Role of Aerosol Acidity and Oxalate Under CMIP6 Emissions, Earth's
Future, 11, e2022EF003353, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ef003353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ef003353</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Betts and Miller(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Betts, A. K. and Miller, M. J.: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II:
Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and arctic air-mass data
sets, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 112, 693–709,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/QJ.49711247308" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/QJ.49711247308</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Bian et al.(2009)Bian, Chin, Rodriguez, Yu, Penner, and
Strahan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bian, H., Chin, M., Rodriguez, J. M., Yu, H., Penner, J. E., and Strahan, S.:
Sensitivity of aerosol optical thickness and aerosol direct radiative effect
to relative humidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2375–2386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-9-2375-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-9-2375-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Bian et al.(2017)Bian, Chin, Hauglustaine, Schulz, Myhre, Bauer,
Lund, Karydis, Kucsera, Pan, Pozzer, Skeie, Steenrod, Sudo, Tsigaridis,
Tsimpidi, and Tsyro</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bian, H., Chin, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., Schulz, M., Myhre, G., Bauer, S. E.,
Lund, M. T., Karydis, V. A., Kucsera, T. L., Pan, X., Pozzer, A., Skeie,
R. B., Steenrod, S. D., Sudo, K., Tsigaridis, K., Tsimpidi, A. P., and Tsyro,
S. G.: Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III
experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12911–12940,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12911-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12911-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Artaxo,
Bretherton, Feingold, Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch,
Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Artaxo, P., Bretherton,
C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann,
U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.-Y.:
Clouds and Aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,  571–657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Bowdalo et al.(2024)Bowdalo, Basart, Guevara, Jorba, Pérez
García-Pando, Jaimes Palomera, Rivera Hernandez, Puchalski, Gay,
Klausen, Moreno, Netcheva, and Tarasova</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bowdalo, D., Basart, S., Guevara, M., Jorba, O., Pérez García-Pando, C., Jaimes Palomera, M., Rivera Hernandez, O., Puchalski, M., Gay, D., Klausen, J., Moreno, S., Netcheva, S., and Tarasova, O.: GHOST: a globally harmonised dataset of surface atmospheric composition measurements, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4417–4495, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4417-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4417-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Brodrick et al.(2023)Brodrick, Okin, Ochoa, Thompson, Clark, Ehlmann,
Keebler, Miller, Mohawald, Ginoux, Garcia-Pando, Goncalves, and
Green</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brodrick, P., Okin, G., Ochoa, F., Thompson, D., Clark, R., Ehlmann, B.,
Keebler, A., Miller, R., Mohawald, N., Ginoux, P., Garcia-Pando, C.,
Goncalves, M., and Green, R.: EMIT L3 Aggregated Mineral Spectral Abundance
and Uncertainty 0.5 Deg V001,  [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/EMIT/EMITL3ASA.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/EMIT/EMITL3ASA.001</a>,   2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Burkholder et al.(2020)Burkholder, Sander, Abbatt, Barker, Cappa,
Crounse, Dibble, Huie, Kolb, Kurylo, Orkin, Percival, Wilmouth, and
Wine</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J. P. D., Barker, J. R., Cappa, C.,
Crounse, J. D., Dibble, T. S., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J.,
Orkin, V. L., Percival, C. J., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P. H.:
Chemical kinetics and photochemical data for use in atmospheric studies; evaluation number 19, Pasadena,
CA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2020, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Byun(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Byun, D.: Dynamically Consistent Formulations in Meteorological and Air Quality Models for Multiscale Atmospheric Studies, Part I: Governing Equations in a Generalized Coordinate System, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 3789–3807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;3789:DCFIMA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;3789:DCFIMA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Capaldo et al.(2000)Capaldo, Pilinis, and Pandis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Capaldo, K. P., Pilinis, C., and Pandis, S. N.: A computationally efficient
hybrid approach for dynamic gas/aerosol transfer in air quality models,
Atmos. Environ., 34, 3617–3627, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00092-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00092-3</a>,
2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Chin et al.(2002)Chin, Ginoux, Kinne, Torres, Holben, Duncan, Martin,
Logan, Higurashi, and Nakajima</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B. N., Duncan, B. N.,
Martin, R. V., Logan, J. A., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.:
Tropospheric Aerosol Optical Thickness from the GOCART Model and Comparisons with Satellite and Sun Photometer Measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Claquin et al.(1999)Claquin, Schulz, and Balkanski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Claquin, T., Schulz, M., and Balkanski, Y. J.: Modeling the mineralogy of
atmospheric dust sources, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104,
22243–22256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900416" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900416</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Crowley et al.(2010)Crowley, Ammann, Cox, Hynes, Jenkin, Mellouki,
Rossi, Troe, and Wallington</label><mixed-citation>
      
Crowley, J. N., Ammann, M., Cox, R. A., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Mellouki,
A., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and Wallington, T. J.: Atmospheric Chemistry and
Physics Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry:
Volume V-heterogeneous reactions on solid substrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 10,
9059–9223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9059-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9059-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Dassios and Pandis(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dassios, K. G. and Pandis, S. N.: The mass accommodation coefficient of
ammonium nitrate aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2993–3003,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00079-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00079-5</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Denier van der Gon et al.(2023)Denier van der Gon, Gauss,
Granier, Arellano, Benedictow, Darras, Dellaert, Guevara, Jalkanen, Krueger,
Kuenen, Liaskoni, Liousse, Markova, Perez, Quack, Simpson, Sindelarova, and
Soulie</label><mixed-citation>
      
Denier van der Gon, H., Gauss, M., Granier, C., Arellano, S., Benedictow, A.,
Darras, S., Dellaert, S., Guevara, M., Jalkanen, J.-P., Krueger, K., Kuenen,
J., Liaskoni, M., Liousse, C., Markova, J., Perez, A. P., Quack, B., Simpson,
D., Sindelarova, K., and Soulie, A.: Documentation of CAMS emission inventory
products,  Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.24380/q2si-ti6i" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24380/q2si-ti6i</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Dentener et al.(1996)Dentener, Carmichael, Zhang, Lelieveld, and
Crutzen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dentener, F. J., Carmichael, G. R., Zhang, Y., Lelieveld, J., and Crutzen,
P. J.: Role of mineral aerosol as a reactive surface in the global
troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101,
22869–22889, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd01818" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd01818</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Ek et al.(2003)Ek, Mitchell, Lin, Rogers, Grunmann, Koren, Gayno, and
Tarpley</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V.,
Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model
advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational
mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8851,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Emanuel and Živković Rothman(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Emanuel, K. A. and Živković Rothman, M.: Development and Evaluation of a
Convection Scheme for Use in Climate Models, J. Atmos.
Sci., 56, 1766–1782,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;1766:DAEOAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;1766:DAEOAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Fagerli et al.(2015)Fagerli, Tsyro, Simpson, Schulz, Gauss, Jonson,
Benedictow, Wind, Ágnes Nyíri, Steensen, Valiyaveetil, Aas, Hjellbrekke,
Solberg, Stebel, Tørseth, Yttri, Mareckova, Wankmüller, Pinterits, Ullrich,
Posch, van der Gon, Alastuey, and Theys</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fagerli, H., Tsyro, S., Simpson, D., Schulz, M., Gauss, M., Jonson, J. E.,
Benedictow, A., Wind, P., Ágnes Nyíri, Steensen, B. M., Valiyaveetil, S.,
Aas, W., Hjellbrekke, A.-G., Solberg, S., Stebel, K., Tørseth, K., Yttri,
K. E., Mareckova, K., Wankmüller, R., Pinterits, M., Ullrich, B., Posch, M.,
van der Gon, H. D., Alastuey, A., and Theys, N.: Transboundary particulate matter, photo-oxidants, acidifying and eutrophying components, EMEP Status Report 2015, <a href="https://emep.int/publ/reports/2015/EMEP_Status_Report_1_2015.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Fairlie et al.(2010)Fairlie, Jacob, Dibb, Alexander, Avery, van
Donkelaar, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fairlie, T. D., Jacob, D. J., Dibb, J. E., Alexander, B., Avery, M. A., van
Donkelaar, A., and Zhang, L.: Impact of mineral dust on nitrate, sulfate, and
ozone in transpacific Asian pollution plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3999–4012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3999-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3999-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Feng and Penner(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, Y. and Penner, J. E.: Global modeling of nitrate and ammonium:
Interaction of aerosols and tropospheric chemistry, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D01304,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006404" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006404</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Fenter et al.(1995)Fenter, Caloz, and Rossi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fenter, F. F., Caloz, F., and Rossi, M. J.: Atmospheric, Sci. Ltd, 29,
3365–3372, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Ferrier et al.(2002)Ferrier, Jin, Lin, Black, Rogers, and
Dimego</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ferrier, B. S., Jin, Y., Lin, Y., Black, T., Rogers, E., and Dimego, G.:
Implementation of a new grid-scale cloud and precipitation scheme in the NCEP Eta model, 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, 12–16 August, San Antonio, Texas, 47241, American Meteorological Society,   280–283, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Foley et al.(2010)Foley, Roselle, Appel, Bhave, Pleim, Otte, Mathur,
Sarwar, Young, Gilliam, Nolte, Kelly, Gilliland, and Bash</label><mixed-citation>
      
Foley, K. M., Roselle, S. J., Appel, K. W., Bhave, P. V., Pleim, J. E., Otte,
T. L., Mathur, R., Sarwar, G., Young, J. O., Gilliam, R. C., Nolte, C. G.,
Kelly, J. T., Gilliland, A. B., and Bash, J. O.: Incremental testing of the
Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4.7,
Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 205–226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-205-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-205-2010</a>,
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Fountoukis and Nenes(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIAII: A computationally efficient
thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup>–Ca<sup>2+</sup>–Mg<sup>2+</sup>–NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–Na<sup>+</sup>–SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>–NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–Cl<sup>−</sup>–H<sub>2</sub>O
aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Ginoux et al.(2001)Ginoux, Chin, Tegen, Prospero, Holben, Dubovik,
and Lin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Tegen, I., Prospero, J. M., Holben, B., Dubovik, O., and
Lin, S. J.: Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the
GOCART model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
20255–20273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000053</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Ginoux et al.(2012)Ginoux, Prospero, Gill, Hsu, and
Zhao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ginoux, P., Prospero, J. M., Gill, T. E., Hsu, N. C., and Zhao, M.:
Global-scale attribution of anthropogenic and natural dust sources and their
emission rates based on MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products, Rev.
Geophys., 50, 1–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RG000388" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RG000388</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Gonçalves Ageitos et al.(2023)Gonçalves Ageitos, Obiso,
Miller, Jorba, Klose, Dawson, Balkanski, Perlwitz, Basart, Di Tomaso,
Escribano, Macchia, Montané, Mahowald, Green, Thompson, and Pérez
García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gonçalves Ageitos, M., Obiso, V., Miller, R. L., Jorba, O., Klose, M.,
Dawson, M., Balkanski, Y., Perlwitz, J., Basart, S., Di Tomaso, E.,
Escribano, J., Macchia, F., Montané, G., Mahowald, N. M., Green, R. O.,
Thompson, D. R., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Modeling dust
mineralogical composition: sensitivity to soil mineralogy atlases and their
expected climate impacts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8623–8657,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8623-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8623-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Goodman(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goodman, A. L.: A laboratory study of the heterogeneous reaction of nitric acid
on calcium carbonate particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 29053–29064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900396" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900396</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Green et al.(2018)Green, Mahowald, Clark, Ehlmann,
Ginoux, Kalashnikova, Miller, Okin, Painter, Pérez
García-Pando, Realmuto, Swayze, Thompson, Middleton, Guanter,
Ben Dor, and Phillips</label><mixed-citation>
      
Green, R. O., Mahowald, N. M., Clark, R. N., Ehlmann, B. L., Ginoux,
P. A., Kalashnikova, O. V., Miller, R. L., Okin, G., Painter, T. H.,
Pérez García-Pando, C., Realmuto, V. J., Swayze, G. A.,
Thompson, D. R., Middleton, E., Guanter, L., Ben Dor, E., and
Phillips, B. R.: NASA’s Earth Surface Mineral Dust Source Investigation, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, vol. 2018, 10–14 December, Washington, D.C.,   A24D–01, <a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AGUFM.A24D..01G" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Guenther et al.(2006)Guenther, Karl, Harley, Wiedinmyer, Palmer, and
Geron</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron,
C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-6-3181-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-6-3181-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Guerschman et al.(2015)Guerschman, Scarth, McVicar, Renzullo,
Malthus, Stewart, Rickards, and Trevithick</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guerschman, J. P., Scarth, P. F., McVicar, T. R., Renzullo, L. J., Malthus,
T. J., Stewart, J. B., Rickards, J. E., and Trevithick, R.: Assessing the
effects of site heterogeneity and soil properties when unmixing
photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil
fractions from Landsat and MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 161,
12–26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.021</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Guevara et al.(2019)Guevara, Tena, Porquet, Jorba, and
García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guevara, M., Tena, C., Porquet, M., Jorba, O., and García-Pando, C. P.:
HERMESv3, a stand-alone multi-scale atmospheric emission modelling
framework-Part 1: Global and regional module, Geosci. Model
Dev., 12, 1885–1907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/GMD-12-1885-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/GMD-12-1885-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Guevara et al.(2021)Guevara, Jorba, Tena, Denier van der Gon, Kuenen,
Elguindi, Darras, Granier, and Pérez García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guevara, M., Jorba, O., Tena, C., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J., Elguindi,
N., Darras, S., Granier, C., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Copernicus
Atmosphere Monitoring Service TEMPOral profiles (CAMS-TEMPO): global and
European emission temporal profile maps for atmospheric chemistry modelling,
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 367–404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-367-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-367-2021</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Guimbaud et al.(2002)Guimbaud, Arens, Gutzwiller, Gäggeler, and
Ammann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guimbaud, C., Arens, F., Gutzwiller, L., Gäggeler, H. W., and Ammann, M.:
Uptake of HNO<sub>3</sub> to deliquescent sea-salt particles: A study using the
short-lived radioactive isotope tracer <sup>13</sup>N, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2, 249–257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2-249-2002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2-249-2002</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Hanisch and Crowley(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hanisch, F. and Crowley, J. N.: The heterogeneous reactivity of gaseous nitric
acid on authentic mineral dust samples, and on individual mineral and clay
mineral components, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 3, 2474–2482,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b101700o" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b101700o</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Hanisch and Crowley(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hanisch, F. and Crowley, J. N.: Heterogeneous reactivity of NO and HNO3 on
mineral dust in the presence of ozone, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
5, 883–887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b211503d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b211503d</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Hauglustaine et al.(2014)Hauglustaine, Balkanski, and
Schulz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hauglustaine, D. A., Balkanski, Y., and Schulz, M.: A global model simulation
of present and future nitrate aerosols and their direct radiative forcing of
climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11031–11063,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11031-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11031-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Herich et al.(2009)Herich, Tritscher, Wiacek, Gysel, Weingartner,
Lohmann, Baltensperger, and Cziczo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Herich, H., Tritscher, T., Wiacek, A., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., Lohmann, U.,
Baltensperger, U., and Cziczo, D. J.: Water uptake of clay and desert dust
aerosol particles at sub- and supersaturated water vapor conditions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 7804–7809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b901585j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b901585j</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Hersbach et al.(2023)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Biavati, Horányi,
Muñoz Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Rozum, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Dee,
and Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers,
D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on
single levels from 1940 to present, Climate Data Store, <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Hodzic et al.(2006)Hodzic, Bessagnet, and Vautard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hodzic, A., Bessagnet, B., and Vautard, R.: A model evaluation of coarse-mode
nitrate heterogeneous formation on dust particles, Atmos. Environ.,
40, 4158–4171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.015</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Hsu et al.(2004)Hsu, Tsay, King, and Herman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S.-C., King, M. D., and Herman, J. R.: Aerosol properties
over bright-reflecting source regions, IEEE Trans. Geosci.
Remote Sens., 42, 557–569, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Iacono et al.(2008)Iacono, Delamere, Mlawer, Shephard, Clough, and
Collins</label><mixed-citation>
      
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A.,
and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, 13103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Jacob(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jacob, D. J.: Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Jaeglé et al.(2011)Jaeglé, Quinn, Bates, Alexander, and
Lin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B., and Lin, J. T.: Global
distribution of sea salt aerosols: New constraints from in situ and remote
sensing observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3137–3157,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-11-3137-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-11-3137-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Janjic(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janjic, Z.: Nonlinear Advection Schemes and Energy Cascade on Semi-Staggered
Grids, AMS,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112&lt;1234:NASAEC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112&lt;1234:NASAEC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Janjic and Gall(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janjic, Z. and Gall, R.: Scientific Documentation of the NCEP
Nonhydrostatic Multiscale Model on the B grid (NMMB), Part
1: Dynamics, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6WH2MZX" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5065/D6WH2MZX</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Janjic(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janjic, Z. I.: The Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 turbulence closure scheme in the NCEP Eta Model, American Meteorological Society, 354–355, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Janjić(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janjić, Z. I.: Comments on “Development and Evaluation of a Convection
Scheme for Use in Climate Models”, J. Atmos. Sci., 57,
3686–3686,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3686:CODAEO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;3686:CODAEO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Janjić(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janjić, Z. I.: Nonsingular Implementation of the Mellor-Yamada Level 2.5 Scheme in the NCEP Meso model, NCEP Office Note; 437, <a href="https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/11409" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Jones et al.(2021)Jones, Hill, Remy, Abraham, Dalvi, Hardacre,
Hewitt, Johnson, Mulcahy, and Turnock</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jones, A. C., Hill, A., Remy, S., Abraham, N. L., Dalvi, M., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Johnson, B., Mulcahy, J. P., and Turnock, S. T.: Exploring the sensitivity of atmospheric nitrate concentrations to nitric acid uptake rate using the Met Office's Unified Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15901–15927, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Jorba et al.(2012)Jorba, Dabdub, Blaszczak-Boxe, Pérez, Janjic,
Baldasano, Spada, Badia, and Gonçalves</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jorba, O., Dabdub, D., Blaszczak-Boxe, C., Pérez, C., Janjic, Z., Baldasano,
J. M., Spada, M., Badia, A., and Gonçalves, M.: Potential significance of
photoexcited NO<sub>2</sub> on global air quality with the NMMB/BSC chemical transport
model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 13301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017730" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017730</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Jordan et al.(2003)Jordan, Dibb, Anderson, and
Fuelberg</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jordan, C. E., Dibb, J. E., Anderson, B. E., and Fuelberg, H. E.: Uptake of
nitrate and sulfate on dust aerosols during TRACE-P, J. Geophys. Res., 108,   8817,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003101</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Journet et al.(2014)Journet, Balkanski, and Harrison</label><mixed-citation>
      
Journet, E., Balkanski, Y., and Harrison, S. P.: A new data set of soil
mineralogy for dust-cycle modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
3801–3816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-14-3801-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-14-3801-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Kaiser et al.(2012)Kaiser, Heil, Andreae, Benedetti, Chubarova,
Jones, Morcrette, Razinger, Schultz, Suttie, and Werf</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones,
L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., and Werf, G.
R. V. D.: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation
system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences, 9, 527–554,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Karydis et al.(2016)Karydis, Tsimpidi, Pozzer, Astitha, and
Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Pozzer, A., Astitha, M., and Lelieveld, J.:
Effects of mineral dust on global atmospheric nitrate concentrations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1491–1509,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1491-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1491-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Karydis et al.(2021)Karydis, Tsimpidi, Pozzer, and
Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karydis, V. A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Pozzer, A., and Lelieveld, J.: How alkaline
compounds control atmospheric aerosol particle acidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys,
21, 14983–15001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14983-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14983-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Klose et al.(2021)Klose, Jorba, Ageitos, Escribano, Dawson, Obiso,
Tomaso, Basart, Pinto, Macchia, Ginoux, Guerschman, Prigent, Huang, Kok,
Miller, and García-Pando</label><mixed-citation>
      
Klose, M., Jorba, O., Ageitos, M. G., Escribano, J., Dawson, M. L., Obiso, V.,
Tomaso, E. D., Basart, S., Pinto, G. M., Macchia, F., Ginoux, P., Guerschman,
J., Prigent, C., Huang, Y., Kok, J. F., Miller, R. L., and García-Pando,
C. P.: Mineral dust cycle in the Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe
CHemistry model (MONARCH) Version 2.0, Geosci. Model Dev, 14, 6403–6444,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6403-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6403-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Krueger et al.(2003)Krueger, Grassian, Laskin, and
Cowin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krueger, B. J., Grassian, V. H., Laskin, A., and Cowin, J. P.: The
transformation of solid atmospheric particles into liquid droplets through
heterogeneous chemistry: Laboratory insights into the processing of calcium
containing mineral dust aerosol in the troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016563" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016563</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Krueger et al.(2004)Krueger, Grassian, Cowin, and
Laskin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krueger, B. J., Grassian, V. H., Cowin, J. P., and Laskin, A.: Heterogeneous
chemistry of individual mineral dust particles from different dust source
regions: The importance of particle mineralogy, Atmos. Environ., 38,
6253–6261, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.010</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Lana et al.(2011)Lana, Bell, Simó, Vallina, Ballabrera-Poy, Kettle,
Dachs, Bopp, Saltzman, Stefels, Johnson, and Liss</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lana, A., Bell, T. G., Simó, R., Vallina, S. M., Ballabrera-Poy, J., Kettle,
A. J., Dachs, J., Bopp, L., Saltzman, E. S., Stefels, J., Johnson, J. E., and
Liss, P. S.: An updated climatology of surface dimethlysulfide concentrations
and emission fluxes in the global ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB1004,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003850" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003850</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Li et al.(2012)Li, Wang, Zhuang, Luo, Sun, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Wang, Z., Zhuang, G., Luo, G., Sun, Y., and Wang, Q.: Mixing of Asian
mineral dust with anthropogenic pollutants over East Asia: A model case study
of a super-duststorm in March 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
7591–7607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7591-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7591-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Li and Shao(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, W. J. and Shao, L. Y.: Observation of nitrate coatings on atmospheric
mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1863–1871,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1863-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1863-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Li et al.(2024)Li, Yu, Yue, Liu, Huang, Chi, Nie, Ding, Dong, and
Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, X., Yu, Z., Yue, M., Liu, Y., Huang, K., Chi, X., Nie, W., Ding, A., Dong,
X., and Wang, M.: Impact of mineral dust photocatalytic heterogeneous
chemistry on the formation of the sulfate and nitrate: A modelling study over
East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 316, 120166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120166" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120166</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Li et al.(2016)Li, Schichtel, Walker, Schwede, Chen, Lehmann,
Puchalski, Gay, and Collett</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Y., Schichtel, B. A., Walker, J. T., Schwede, D. B., Chen, X., Lehmann,
C. M., Puchalski, M. A., Gay, D. A., and Collett, J. L.: Increasing
importance of deposition of reduced nitrogen in the United States,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5874–5879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525736113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525736113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Liao et al.(2003)Liao, Adams, Chung, Seinfeld, Mickley, and
Jacob</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liao, H., Adams, P. J., Chung, S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Mickley, L. J., and
Jacob, D. J.: Interactions between tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in a
unified general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108,  4001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001260" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001260</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Liu and Abbatt(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, T. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidation of sulfur dioxide by nitrogen dioxide
accelerated at the interface of deliquesced aerosol particles, Nat.
Chem.,  13, 1173–1177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Liu et al.(2007)Liu, P., Wang, and Laskin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., P., C. J., Wang, H., and Laskin, A.: Kinetic Study of Heterogeneous
Reaction of Deliquesced NaCl Particles with Gaseous HNO<sub>3</sub>, J. Phys. Chem. A,
111, 10026–10043, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Liu et al.(2008)Liu, Gibson, Cain, Wang, Grassian, and
Laskin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., Gibson, E. R., Cain, J. P., Wang, H., Grassian, V. H., and Laskin, A.:
Kinetics of heterogeneous reaction of CaCO<sub>3</sub> particles with gaseous HNO3 over
a wide range of humidity, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 1561–1571,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp076169h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp076169h</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Liu et al.(2022)Liu, Zhan, Zheng, Song, Zhang, Ma, Hua, Xie, Bao,
Yan, Bianchi, Petäjä, Ding, Song, He, and Kulmala</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., Zhan, J., Zheng, F., Song, B., Zhang, Y., Ma, W., Hua, C., Xie, J.,
Bao, X., Yan, C., Bianchi, F., Petäjä, T., Ding, A., Song, Y., He, H., and
Kulmala, M.: Dust emission reduction enhanced gas-to-particle conversion of
ammonia in the North China Plain, Nat. Commun., 13, 6887,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34733-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34733-4</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Luo et al.(2019)Luo, Yu, and Schwab</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luo, G., Yu, F., and Schwab, J.: Revised treatment of wet scavenging processes
dramatically improves GEOS-Chem 12.0.0 simulations of surface nitric acid,
nitrate, and ammonium over the United States, Geosci. Model
Dev., 12, 3439–3447, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3439-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3439-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Lurmann et al.(1997)Lurmann, Wexler, Pandis, Musarra, Kumar, and
Seinfeld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lurmann, F. W., Wexler, A. S., Pandis, S. N., Musarra, S., Kumar, N., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Modelling urban and regional aerosols – II. Application to
California's South Coast Air Basin, Atmos. Environ., 31, 2695–2715,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00100-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00100-3</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Ma et al.(2021)Ma, Zhong, Ma, Ye, Zhao, Liu, Zhang, Chen, Liu, Chu,
and He</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, Q., Zhong, C., Ma, J., Ye, C., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, P., Chen, T., Liu,
C., Chu, B., and He, H.: Comprehensive Study about the Photolysis of Nitrates
on Mineral Oxides, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 8604–8612, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Mahowald et al.(2014)Mahowald, Albani, Kok, Engelstaeder, Scanza,
Ward, and Flanner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mahowald, N., Albani, S., Kok, J. F., Engelstaeder, S., Scanza, R., Ward,
D. S., and Flanner, M. G.: The size distribution of desert dust aerosols and
its impact on the Earth system, Aeolian Res., 15, 53–71,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Mashburn et al.(2006)Mashburn, Frinak, and Tolbert</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mashburn, C. D., Frinak, E. K., and Tolbert, M. A.: Heterogeneous uptake of
nitric acid on Na-montmorillonite clay as a function of relative humidity,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D15213,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006525" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006525</a>,
2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Meng and Seinfeld(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meng, Z. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Time scales to achieve atmospheric gas-aerosol
equilibrium for volatile species, Atmos. Environ., 30, 2889–2900,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00493-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00493-9</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Metzger et al.(2002)Metzger, Dentener, Pandis, and
Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Metzger, S., Dentener, F., Pandis, S., and Lelieveld, J.: Gas/aerosol
partitioning: 1. A computationally efficient model, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4312,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001102</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Milousis et al.(2024)Milousis, Tsimpidi, Tost, Pandis, Nenes,
Kiendler-Scharr, and Karydis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Milousis, A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Tost, H., Pandis, S. N., Nenes, A.,
Kiendler-Scharr, A., and Karydis, V. A.: Implementation of the ISORROPIA-lite
aerosol thermodynamics model into the EMAC chemistry climate model (based on
MESSy v2.55): implications for aerosol composition and acidity, Geosci.
Model Dev., 17, 1111–1131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1111-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1111-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Connolly, P., Benz, S., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Cotton, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3007–3021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Monin and Obukhov(1954)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere, in: Tr. Akad. Nauk SSSR Geophiz. Inst, Vol. 24,   163–187, 1954.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Myhre et al.(2006)Myhre, Grini, and Metzger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myhre, G., Grini, A., and Metzger, S.: Modelling of nitrate and
ammonium-containing aerosols in presence of sea salt, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4809–4821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4809-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4809-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Navarro-Barboza et al.(2024)Navarro-Barboza, Pandolfi, Guevara,
Enciso, Tena, Via, Yus-Díez, Reche, Pérez, Alastuey, Querol, and
Jorba</label><mixed-citation>
      
Navarro-Barboza, H., Pandolfi, M., Guevara, M., Enciso, S., Tena, C., Via, M.,
Yus-Díez, J., Reche, C., Pérez, N., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., and Jorba,
O.: Uncertainties in source allocation of carbonaceous aerosols in a
Mediterranean region, Environ. Int., 183, 108252,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108252" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108252</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Nenes et al.(1998)Nenes, Pandis, and Pilinis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A New Thermodynamic
Equilibrium Model for Multiphase Multicomponent Inorganic Aerosols, Aquat.
Geochem.,  4, 123–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009604003981</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Pai et al.(2020)Pai, Heald, Pierce, Farina, Marais, Jimenez,
Campuzano-Jost, Nault, Middlebrook, Coe, Shilling, Bahreini, Dingle, and
Vu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pai, S. J., Heald, C. L., Pierce, J. R., Farina, S. C., Marais, E. A., Jimenez,
J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Middlebrook, A. M., Coe, H.,
Shilling, J. E., Bahreini, R., Dingle, J. H., and Vu, K.: An evaluation of
global organic aerosol schemes using airborne observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2637–2665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Paulot et al.(2016)Paulot, Ginoux, Cooke, Donner, Fan, Lin, Mao,
Naik, and Horowitz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paulot, F., Ginoux, P., Cooke, W. F., Donner, L. J., Fan, S., Lin, M.-Y., Mao,
J., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.: Sensitivity of nitrate aerosols to ammonia
emissions and to nitrate chemistry: implications for present and future
nitrate optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 16, 1459–1477,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1459-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1459-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Phadnis and Carmichael(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Phadnis, M. J. and Carmichael, G. R.: Numerical investigation of the influence
of mineral dust on the tropospheric chemistry of east Asia, J.
Atmos. Chem., 36, 285–323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006391626069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006391626069</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Pratte and Rossi(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pratte, P. and Rossi, M. J.: Nitric acid uptake on NaCl and sea salt aerosol at
relative humidities in the range 2.8 to 25&thinsp;% at ambient temperature,
1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2053.4562" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2053.4562</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Prince et al.(2007)Prince, Kleiber, Grassian, and Young</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prince, A. P., Kleiber, P., Grassian, V. H., and Young, M. A.: Heterogeneous
interactions of calcite aerosol with sulfur dioxide and sulfur
dioxide–nitric acid mixtures, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9,
3432–3439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B703296J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B703296J</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Pringle et al.(2010)Pringle, Tost, Message, Steil, Giannadaki, Nenes,
Fountoukis, Stier, Vignati, and Lelieveld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pringle, K. J., Tost, H., Message, S., Steil, B., Giannadaki, D., Nenes, A.,
Fountoukis, C., Stier, P., Vignati, E., and Lelieveld, J.: Description and
evaluation of GMXe: A new aerosol submodel for global simulations (v1),
Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 391–412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-391-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-391-2010</a>,
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Pérez et al.(2011)Pérez, Haustein, Janjic, Jorba, Huneeus,
Baldasano, Black, Basart, Nickovic, Miller, Perlwitz, Schulz, and
Thomson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez, C., Haustein, K., Janjic, Z., Jorba, O., Huneeus, N., Baldasano, J. M.,
Black, T., Basart, S., Nickovic, S., Miller, R. L., Perlwitz, J. P., Schulz,
M., and Thomson, M.: Atmospheric dust modeling from meso to global scales
with the online NMMB/BSC-Dust model – Part 1: Model description, annual
simulations and evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
13001–13027, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13001-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13001-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Raupach et al.(1993)Raupach, Gillette, and Leys</label><mixed-citation>
      
Raupach, M. R., Gillette, D. A., and Leys, J. F.: The effect of roughness
elements on wind erosion threshold, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 3023–3029,  1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Rea(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rea, D. K.: The paleoclimatic record provided by eolian deposition in the deep
sea: The geologic history of wind, Rev. Geophys., 32, 159–195,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG03257" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG03257</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Riemer et al.(2003)Riemer, Vogel, Vogel, Schell, Ackermann, Kessler,
and Hass</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riemer, N., Vogel, H., Vogel, B., Schell, B., Ackermann, I., Kessler, C., and
Hass, H.: Impact of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> on chemistry and
nitrate aerosol formation in the lower troposphere under photosmog
conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4144,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002436" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002436</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Riemer et al.(2019)Riemer, Ault, West, Craig, and
Curtis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol
Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57,
187–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Rémy et al.(2019)Rémy, Kipling, Flemming, Boucher, Nabat, Michou,
Bozzo, Ades, Huijnen, Benedetti, Engelen, Peuch, and Morcrette</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rémy, S., Kipling, Z., Flemming, J., Boucher, O., Nabat, P., Michou, M.,
Bozzo, A., Ades, M., Huijnen, V., Benedetti, A., Engelen, R., Peuch, V.-H.,
and Morcrette, J.-J.: Description and evaluation of the tropospheric aerosol
scheme in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)
Integrated Forecasting System (IFS-AER, cycle 45R1), Geosci. Model
Dev., 12, 4627–4659, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4627-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4627-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Rémy et al.(2022)Rémy, Kipling, Huijnen, Flemming, Nabat, Michou,
Ades, Engelen, and Peuch</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rémy, S., Kipling, Z., Huijnen, V., Flemming, J., Nabat, P., Michou, M., Ades,
M., Engelen, R., and Peuch, V. H.: Description and evaluation of the
tropospheric aerosol scheme in the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS-AER,
cycle 47R1) of ECMWF, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4881–4912,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4881-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4881-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Saul et al.(2006)Saul, Tolocka, and Johnston</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saul, T. D., Tolocka, M. P., and Johnston, M. V.: Reactive uptake of nitric
acid onto sodium chloride aerosols across a wide range of relative
humidities, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 7614–7620,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp060639a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp060639a</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Schwartz(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwartz, S. E.: Mass-Transport Considerations Pertinent to Aqueous Phase
Reactions of Gases in Liquid-Water Clouds,   415–471, Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642-70627-1, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. and Pandis, S.: Atmos. Chem. Phys.: From Air
Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd Edn.,
<a href="https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1345321" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 April 2025),
2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmos. Chem. Phys.: From Air
Pollution to Climate Change, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable
Development, 40, 26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1999.10544295" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1999.10544295</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Semeniuk and Dastoor(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Semeniuk, K. and Dastoor, A.: Current state of atmospheric aerosol
thermodynamics and mass transfer modeling: A review, Atmosphere, 11, 1–71,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020156</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Song and Carmichael(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, C. H. and Carmichael, G. R.: A three-dimensional modeling investigation
of the evolution processes of dust and sea-salt particles in east Asia,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 18131–18154,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900352" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900352</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Song et al.(2007)Song, Kim, Lee, Carmichael, Lee, and Lee</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, C. H., Kim, C. M., Lee, Y. J., Carmichael, G. R., Lee, B. K., and Lee,
D. S.: An evaluation of reaction probabilities of sulfate and nitrate
precursors onto East Asian dust particles, J. Geophys. Res, 112, 18206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008092</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Song et al.(2018)Song, Gao, Xu, Shao, Shi, Wang, Wang, Sun, and
McElroy</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, S., Gao, M., Xu, W., Shao, J., Shi, G., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Sun, Y., and
McElroy, M. B.: Fine-particle pH for Beijing winter haze as inferred from
different thermodynamic equilibrium models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7423–7438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7423-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7423-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Soulie et al.(2024)Soulie, Granier, Darras, Zilbermann, Doumbia,
Guevara, Jalkanen, Keita, Liousse, Crippa, Guizzardi, Hoesly, and
Smith</label><mixed-citation>
      
Soulie, A., Granier, C., Darras, S., Zilbermann, N., Doumbia, T., Guevara, M.,
Jalkanen, J. P., Keita, S., Liousse, C., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Hoesly,
R., and Smith, S. J.: Global anthropogenic emissions (CAMS-GLOB-ANT) for the
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service simulations of air quality forecasts
and reanalyses, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2261–2279,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ESSD-16-2261-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ESSD-16-2261-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Sousse(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sousse, R.: “A Comprehensive Global Modelling Assessment of Nitrate
Heterogeneous Formation on Desert Dust”: Column loads monthly means per
species, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12789730" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12789730</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Spada(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spada, M.: Development and evaluation of an atmospheric aerosol module implemented within the NMMB/BSC-CTM, Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/2117/95991" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Spada et al.(2013)Spada, Jorba, García-Pando, Janjic, and
Baldasano</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spada, M., Jorba, O., García-Pando, C. P., Janjic, Z., and Baldasano, J. M.:
Modeling and evaluation of the global sea-salt aerosol distribution:
Sensitivity to emission schemes and resolution effects at coastal/orographic
sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11735–11755,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-13-11735-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ACP-13-11735-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Sulprizio(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sulprizio, M.: Chemistry instability introduced by ISORROPIA v2.2,
<a href="http://wiki.seas.harvard.edu/geos-chem/index.php/ISORROPIA_II#Chemistry_instability_introduced_by_ISORROPIA_v2.2" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 April 2025),
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>Suman et al.(2024)Suman, Zanini, Vulpio, and Pinelli</label><mixed-citation>
      
Suman, A., Zanini, N., Vulpio, A., and Pinelli, M.: Apparatus and methods for
the calibration and correction of a polydispersed dust feeding system applied
in multiphase flow experiments, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 151,
111074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.111074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.111074</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>Thompson et al.(2024)Thompson, Green, Bradley, Brodrick, Mahowald,
Ben-Dor, Bennett, Bernas, Carmon, Chadwick, Clark, Coleman, Cox, Diaz,
Eastwood, Eckert, Ehlmann, Ginoux, Gonçalves Ageitos, and
Zandbergen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thompson, D., Green, R., Bradley, C., Brodrick, P., Mahowald, N., Ben-Dor, E.,
Bennett, M., Bernas, M., Carmon, N., Chadwick, K. D., Clark, R., Coleman, R.,
Cox, E., Diaz, E., Eastwood, M., Eckert, R., Ehlmann, B., Ginoux, P.,
Gonçalves Ageitos, M., and Zandbergen, S.: On-orbit calibration and
performance of the EMIT imaging spectrometer, Remote Sens. Environ.,
303, 113986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113986" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113986</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>Tolocka et al.(2004)Tolocka, Saul, and Johnston</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tolocka, M. P., Saul, T. D., and Johnston, M. V.: Reactive Uptake of Nitric
Acid into Aqueous Sodium Chloride Droplets Using Real-Time Single-Particle
Mass Spectrometry, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108, 2659–2665,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp036612y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp036612y</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>Trump et al.(2015)Trump, Fountoukis, Donahue, and Pandis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trump, E. R., Fountoukis, C., Donahue, N. M., and Pandis, S. N.: Improvement of
simulation of fine inorganic PM levels through better descriptions of coarse
particle chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 102, 274–281,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.059</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>Uno et al.(2020)Uno, Wang, Itahashi, Yumimoto, Yamamura, Yoshino,
Takami, Hayasaki, and Kim</label><mixed-citation>
      
Uno, I., Wang, Z., Itahashi, S., Yumimoto, K., Yamamura, Y., Yoshino, A.,
Takami, A., Hayasaki, M., and Kim, B.-G. G.: Paradigm shift in aerosol
chemical composition over regions downwind of China, Sci. Rep., 10,
1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63592-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63592-6</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>Usher et al.(2002)Usher, Al-Hosney, Carlos-Cuellar, and
Grassian</label><mixed-citation>
      
Usher, C. R., Al-Hosney, H., Carlos-Cuellar, S., and Grassian, V. H.: A
laboratory study of the heterogeneous uptake and oxidation of sulfur dioxide
on mineral dust particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4713,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002051</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>Usher et al.(2003)Usher, Michel, and Grassian</label><mixed-citation>
      
Usher, C. R., Michel, A. E., and Grassian, V. H.: Reactions on Mineral Dust,
Chem. Rev., 103, 4883–4939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020657y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020657y</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>Vignati et al.(2004)Vignati, Wilson, and Stier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vignati, E., Wilson, J., and Stier, P.: M7: An efficient size-resolved aerosol
microphysics module for large-scale aerosol transport models, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109,  D22202,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004485" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004485</a>,
2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>Vlasenko et al.(2006)Vlasenko, Sjogren, Weingartner, Stemmler,
Gäggeler, and Ammann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vlasenko, A., Sjogren, S., Weingartner, E., Stemmler, K., Gäggeler, H. W., and
Ammann, M.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Effect of humidity on nitric acid uptake to mineral dust aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2147-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2147-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>Vlasenko et al.(2009)Vlasenko, Huthwelker, Gäggeler, and
Ammann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vlasenko, A., Huthwelker, T., Gäggeler, H. W., and Ammann, M.: Kinetics of the
heterogeneous reaction of nitric acid with mineral dust particles: An aerosol
flowtube study, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 7921–7930,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b904290n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b904290n</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>Wang et al.(2017)Wang, Pan, Uno, Li, Wang, Chen, Fu, Yang, Kobayashi,
Shimizu, Sugimoto, and Yamamoto</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Z., Pan, X., Uno, I., Li, J., Wang, Z., Chen, X., Fu, P., Yang, T.,
Kobayashi, H., Shimizu, A., Sugimoto, N., and Yamamoto, S.: Significant
impacts of heterogeneous reactions on the chemical composition and mixing
state of dust particles: A case study during dust events over northern China,
Atmos. Environ., 159, 83–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.044</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>Wei(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, C.: Modeling the effects of heterogeneous reactions on atmospheric Modeling the effects of heterogeneous reactions on atmospheric chemistry and aerosol properties chemistry and aerosol properties, Ph.D. thesis, University of Iowa, <a href="https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.2xewzpnz" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.2xewzpnz</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>Wesely(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wesely, M.: Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition
in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23,
1293–1304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>Wexler and Seinfeld(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wexler, A. S. and Seinfeld, J. H.: The distribution of ammonium salts among a
size and composition dispersed aerosol, Atmos. Environ. Pt. A., 24, 1231–1246,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90088-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90088-5</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>Whitten et al.(2010)Whitten, Heo, Kimura, McDonald-Buller, Allen,
Carter, and Yarwood</label><mixed-citation>
      
Whitten, G. Z., Heo, G., Kimura, Y., McDonald-Buller, E., Allen, D. T., Carter,
W. P., and Yarwood, G.: A new condensed toluene mechanism for Carbon Bond:
CB05-TU, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5346–5355,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2009.12.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2009.12.029</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib134"><label>Wild et al.(2000)Wild, Zhu, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wild, O., Zhu, X., and Prather, M. J.: Fast-J: Accurate Simulation of In- and
Below-Cloud Photolysis in Tropospheric Chemical Models, J.
Atmos. Chem., 37, 245–282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006415919030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006415919030</a>,
2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib135"><label>Yarwood et al.(2005)Yarwood, Rao, Yocke, and Whitten</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yarwood, G., Rao, S., Yocke, M., and Whitten, G. Z.: Updates to the carbon bond chemical mechanism: CB05 final report to the US EPA, RT-0400675, <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162-3417" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 April 2025), 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib136"><label>Yu et al.(2017)Yu, Jang, and Park</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, Z., Jang, M., and Park, J.: Modeling atmospheric mineral aerosol chemistry
to predict heterogeneous photooxidation of SO<sub>2</sub>,
17, 10001–10017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10001-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10001-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib137"><label>Yue et al.(2022)Yue, Cheng, Lee, Stocker, He, Yao, and
Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yue, Y., Cheng, J., Lee, K. S., Stocker, R., He, X., Yao, M., and Wang, J.:
Effects of relative humidity on heterogeneous reaction of SO<sub>2</sub> with CaCO<sub>3</sub>
particles and formation of CaSO<sub>4</sub>&thinsp; ⋅ &thinsp;2H<sub>2</sub>O crystal as secondary aerosol,
Atmos. Environ., 268, 118776, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2021.118776" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2021.118776</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib138"><label>Zakoura and Pandis(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zakoura, M. and Pandis, S. N.: Overprediction of aerosol nitrate by chemical
transport models: The role of grid resolution, Atmos. Environ., 187,
390–400, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.066</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib139"><label>Zaveri et al.(2008)Zaveri, Easter, Fast, and Peters</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.: Model for
Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC), J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782</a>,
2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib140"><label>Zaveri et al.(2021)Zaveri, Easter, Singh, Wang, Lu, Tilmes, Emmons,
Vitt, Zhang, Liu, Ghan, and Rasch</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Singh, B., Wang, H., Lu, Z., Tilmes, S., Emmons,
L. K., Vitt, F., Zhang, R., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., and Rasch, P. J.:
Development and Evaluation of Chemistry-Aerosol-Climate Model
CAM5-Chem-MAM7-MOSAIC: Global Atmospheric Distribution and Radiative Effects
of Nitrate Aerosol, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002346,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002346</a>, 2021.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib141"><label>Zhai et al.(2023)Zhai, Jacob, Pendergrass, Colombi, Shah, Yang,
Zhang, Wang, Kim, Sun, Choi, Park, Luo, Yu, Woo, Kim, Dibb, Lee, Han,
Anderson, Li, and Liao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Pendergrass, D. C., Colombi, N. K., Shah, V., Yang, L. H., Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Kim, H., Sun, Y., Choi, J.-S., Park, J.-S., Luo, G., Yu, F., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y., Dibb, J. E., Lee, T., Han, J.-S., Anderson, B. E., Li, K., and Liao, H.: Coarse particulate matter air quality in East Asia: implications for fine particulate nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4271–4281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4271-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4271-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib142"><label>Zilitinkevich(1965)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zilitinkevich, S. S.: Bulk characteristics of turbulence in the atmospheric
planetary boundary layer,   Trudy GGO,  167, 49–52, 1965.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
