<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-25-3109-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>The impact of uncertainty in black carbon's refractive index on simulated optical depth and radiative forcing</article-title><alt-title>BC refractive index</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Digby</surname><given-names>Ruth A. R.</given-names></name>
          <email>ruth.digby@ec.gc.ca</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9709-9278</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>von Salzen</surname><given-names>Knut</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Monahan</surname><given-names>Adam H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Gillett</surname><given-names>Nathan P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2957-0002</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jiangnan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1554-7266</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ruth A. R. Digby (ruth.digby@ec.gc.ca)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>March</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>3109</fpage><lpage>3130</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>June</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>July</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>December</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>January</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Ruth A. R. Digby et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e124">The radiative forcing of black carbon (BC) is subject to many complex, interconnected sources of uncertainty. Here we isolate the role of the refractive index, which determines the extent to which BC absorbs and scatters radiation. We compare four refractive index schemes: three that are commonly used in Earth system models and a fourth more recent estimate with higher absorption. With other parameterizations held constant, changing BC's spectrally varying refractive index from the least- to  most-absorbing estimate commonly used in Earth system models (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) increases simulated absorbing aerosol optical depth (AAOD) by 42 % and the effective radiative forcing from BC–radiation interactions (BC ERFari) by 47 %. The more recent estimate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">532</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, increases AAOD and BC ERFari by 59 % and 100 % respectively relative to the low-absorption case. The AAOD increases are comparable to those from recent updates to aerosol emission inventories and, in BC source regions, up to two-thirds as large as the difference in AAOD retrieved from MISR (Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer) and POLDER-GRASP (Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances instrument with the Generalized Retrieval of Atmosphere and Surface Properties algorithm) satellites. The BC ERFari increases are comparable to previous assessments of overall uncertainties in BC ERFari, even though this source of uncertainty is typically overlooked. Although model sensitivity to the choice of BC refractive index is known to be modulated by other parameterization choices, our results highlight the importance of considering refractive index diversity in model intercomparison projects.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada</funding-source>
<award-id>RGPIN-2019-204986</award-id>
<award-id>RGPIN-2017-04043</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e224">Black carbon (BC), formed as a result of incomplete combustion, is the most strongly warming of the aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.1"/>, with particularly important impacts in the Arctic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx100" id="paren.2"/>. Although its effective radiative forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">ERF;</named-content></xref> is understood to be positive, the magnitude of this forcing remains uncertain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e241">This uncertainty stems from many sources, including uncertainty in the optical properties of freshly emitted BC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.5"/> and the changes in these properties as BC ages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx91" id="paren.6"/>; in the total burden and vertical distribution of BC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.7"/>, which are themselves complicated by uncertainties in BC emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx105" id="paren.8"/> and lifetime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.9"/>; and uncertainty in the details of BC–cloud interactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx115" id="paren.10"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e263">Constraining the climatic effect of BC is complicated by the fact that models and observations frequently disagree, but it is not always clear which – if either – is correct <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.11"/>. For example, models tend to simulate lower absorption aerosol optical depth (AAOD) than is measured by AERONET stations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.12"/>. This can be interpreted to mean that models underestimate AAOD perhaps because of emissions that are too low or removal that is too vigorous  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.13"/> or because the simulated aerosols are insufficiently absorbing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.14"/>. Alternatively it could indicate that AERONET overestimates AAOD, as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.15"/> based on comparisons between AERONET and in situ aircraft measurements. It is also possible that both models and observations are reasonably accurate and  that the apparent discrepancy comes from comparing point-source measurements of a very spatially heterogeneous quantity against model grid-cell-averaged fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx104" id="paren.16"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e285">In this work we investigate the sensitivity of BC AAOD and radiative forcing to one key source of uncertainty: the complex refractive index, which determines the degree to which an aerosol absorbs and scatters radiation. Lab-based estimates of the BC refractive index (BCRI) show remarkable diversity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.17"/>, and this diversity is reflected in the range of values commonly used in Earth system models (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). Recent studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.18"/> suggest that uncertainty in the choice of BCRI may, along with uncertainties in the treatment of mixing and ageing, contribute to the diversity in BC absorption simulated by Earth system models; however, no study has to date isolated the impact of BCRI on key BC fields in a single model with other aerosol treatments held constant. Here we select four BCRI schemes, three of which are commonly used in the climate modeling community and one more recent lab-based estimate which serves as an upper bound on the likely absorption of atmospheric BC, and use them to run otherwise-identical ensembles of simulations in the atmospheric model CanAM5.1-PAM (Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5.1 with the PLA (piecewise lognormal approximation) Aerosol Model).  We contextualize the resulting spread in climate-relevant quantities including AAOD and the effective radiative forcing from aerosol–radiation interactions (ERFari) by comparing with a number of other known uncertainties. In a companion analysis, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.19"/> use an offline radiative transfer model to examine the sensitivity of wavelength- and mixing-state-dependent optical properties and radiative effects of BC to the choice of BCRI. Taken together, these works illustrate the influence of uncertainty in the BCRI on BC's simulated climate impacts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>The refractive index of black carbon</title>
      <p id="d2e307">The refractive index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a complex, wavelength-dependent parameter that determines the extent to which an aerosol absorbs or scatters radiation.  It cannot be measured directly but is inferred by fitting laboratory measurements to an assumed optical model which describes the optical properties of an aerosol as a function of refractive index. For BC, these may be measurements of the scattering and absorption of light by flame-generated BC particles or of the reflectance at different angles by a compressed BC sample <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.20"/>. The measurements are then inverted to yield the full spectrally varying refractive index, for example using the Kramers–Kronig relations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.21"/> or the Drude–Lorentz dispersion relation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.22"/>. The former method is exact but requires measurements over a greater range of wavelengths; the latter requires fewer measurements but yields poor results at visible wavelengths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e340">The choice of optical model can introduce substantial uncertainty into the derived refractive index. Historically, many estimates of the refractive index of black carbon have used Mie theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.24"/>,  which provides an exact solution to Maxwell's equations for scattering from spherical particles. However, freshly emitted BC particles are not spherical but instead consist of fractal-like aggregates of individual monomers. Assuming Mie theory can result in substantial underprediction of these particles' absorption and scattering; furthermore, the inferred BCRI describes a combination of pure BC and the air contained within the aggregates' voids, whereas the objective is to measure the refractive index of pure BC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.25"/>. Improving on Mie theory, a number of optical models for aggregate particles exist. Rayleigh–Debye–Gans (RDG) theory remains the most frequently used due to its simplicity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.26"/>, but it provides an approximate solution only and does not account for multiple scattering between the monomers, which may lead to the underestimation of the mass absorption cross section <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.27"/>. Numerically exact solutions for aggregate particles include the multi-sphere T-matrix <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">MSTM;</named-content></xref> and generalized multi-particle Mie <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">GMM;</named-content></xref> methods for aggregates composed of non-overlapping spheres or the discrete dipole approximation  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx114" id="paren.30"><named-content content-type="pre">DDA;</named-content></xref> for more complex morphologies. For more on these methods, the interested reader is referred to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.31"/>. In practice, however, the RDG approximation is often sufficient for BC since its scattering is so low and other uncertainties are so high <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.32"/>.  The four BCRI schemes assessed in this work were derived using Mie theory or RDG-type optical models.</p>
      <p id="d2e377">For this study, we select four representative BCRI schemes from the literature: three that span the range of BCRI commonly used in climate models and one more recent laboratory estimate that serves as an upper bound on the likely absorption of atmospheric BC. We use the term <italic>scheme</italic> both to emphasize the fact that the BCRI is not a single value but rather varies with wavelength, and also because we co-vary the density of BC with its refractive index. This decision is made for two reasons. The first is physical consistency: in order to derive the BCRI from optical measurements, one must assume a value for the density, and so the BCRI scheme is conditional on that chosen value.  The second reason is modeling convention: although modeling centres may tune the density and refractive index independently,  it is generally true that models use either a low-absorption BCRI and high density or vice versa in order to obtain reasonable estimates of BC absorption. For the purposes of this analysis, the two parameter choices can thus be considered linked. The four BCRI schemes assessed in this work are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and described in the following subsections, listed from least to most absorbing.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e389">The four BCRI schemes compared in this analysis, listed from least to most absorbing. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: complex refractive index at 550 nm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: absorption function (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) at 550 nm.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abbreviation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reference</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [g cm<sup>−3</sup>]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">dA1991</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.33"/>
                </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.75–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.177</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB2006low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.34"/>
                </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.75–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.248</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BB2006high</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.35"/>
                </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.95–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.255</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Besc2016<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.36"/>
                </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.48–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.401</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e430"><sup>*</sup> For the Besc2016 scheme, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are reported at 532 nm, not 550 nm.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Scheme 1: dA1991 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e736">The origins of this scheme can be traced back to the 1970s at least. A study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.37"/> tabulated the refractive indices of dust-like, water-soluble, soot, oceanic, sulfate, and mineral aerosol components at wavelengths from 0.300–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, derived using Mie theory. The refractive indices of soot, which is frequently used interchangeably with BC, were drawn from the tabulation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="text.38"/> which itself compiled data from a number of pre-existing measurements.  Following its publication in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.39"/>, this scheme was included in the Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.40"><named-content content-type="pre">OPAC;</named-content></xref> database and entered widespread usage in the climate modeling community, where it is most frequently attributed to one of these two publications. It has since been demonstrated that the dA1991 scheme is inconsistent with observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.41"/>; nevertheless, it remains in use in many models (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>),  and it is the default scheme in CanAM5.1-PAM.</p>
      <p id="d2e769">In this work, the spectrally varying refractive index is drawn directly from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.42"/> tabulation. However, we modify the scheme by using a density of 1.6 g cm<sup>−3</sup>. The original <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.43"/> scheme assumed a density of 1.0 g cm<sup>−3</sup> to account for the fact that the particles they measured contained a great deal of air <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.44"/>. This density is far lower than the accepted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g cm<sup>−3</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.45"/> and is an unreasonable value of use in an Earth system model. A density of 1.6 g cm<sup>−3</sup> is selected as a compromise.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Schemes 2 and 3:  BB2006low and BB2006high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e912"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.46"/> compiled and reviewed laboratory measurements of the optical properties of BC. From these data, they used the RDG approximation and the accepted density of black carbon, 1.8 g cm<sup>−3</sup>, to propose a range of BCRI values lying along a “void fraction line” which describes BC with varying degrees of air included within its structure. We select <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the lowest and highest values proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.47"/>, for this analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e991">Unlike <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.48"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.49"/> only provide estimates of the BCRI at 550 nm. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.50"/> obtained full spectral information for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the expressions derived by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.51"/>. We use this dataset for our BB2006high scheme and apply an equivalent scaling to the equations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.52"/> to obtain the BB2006low spectrum given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For both schemes we assume a density of 1.8 g cm<sup>−3</sup> as used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.53"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1083">The BB2006high scheme is used by a number of aerosol models. To our knowledge, no models currently use the BB2006low scheme, although some use intermediate values from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.54"/>, most commonly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). Nevertheless we select <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as our intermediate BCRI in order to span the range of estimates from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.55"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Scheme 4: Besc2016 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">532</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e1191"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.56"/> acknowledged in their review that their recommended BCRI could not reproduce the observed mass absorption cross section of black carbon when used in combination with the accepted density of 1.8 g cm<sup>−3</sup>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.57"/> investigated their hypothesis that the discrepancy was related to shortcomings of the RDG model used in their calculations and demonstrated that the choice of optical model was  insufficient to explain the underestimation. More recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.58"/> reviewed estimates of the refractive index published since <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.59"/> in the context of current estimates of the mass absorption cross section and the absorption function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/>). Based on this assessment, they recommended refractive indices with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the visible and near-infrared, which would rule out the three BCRI schemes described above.</p>
      <p id="d2e1252">One scheme recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.60"/> was the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.61"/> estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">532</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, derived from measurements of ethylene flame using a bulk density of 1.74 g cm<sup>−3</sup> and a modified version of the RDG approximation which accounts for some internal scattering effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112" id="paren.62"/>. This scheme is substantially more absorbing than the previous three at all wavelengths, and to our knowledge it has not been used in any Earth system models. The Besc2016 scheme may not be representative of the BC being simulated by Earth system models since most atmospheric BC comes from more complex sources such as coal, propane, or biomass burning and because BC undergoes rapid morphological transitions after its emission <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.63"/> which alter its optical properties.  However, its inclusion in this analysis provides a useful upper bound for the likely impacts of varying the BCRI in Earth system models. Other recent BCRI estimates are discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1311"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.64"/> report the refractive index at a subset of wavelengths between 266 and 1064 nm. Estimates of the refractive index at other wavelengths, which were derived through application of the Kramers–Kronig relation, were obtained though personal communication with the authors and are presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.65"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1323">Illustrative sample of aerosol schemes that use our selected BCRI; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> for descriptions of the schemes. To the best of our knowledge no aerosol schemes currently use BB2006low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the lowest value recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.66"/>) or the more recent Besc2016 scheme. However, a number of aerosol models use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an alternate recommendation from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.67"/> that falls between our BB2006low and BB2006high BCRI schemes, and we include a selection of those models here.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Host model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">References</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">dA1991 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AM4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GFDL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118" id="text.68"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CLASSIC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ACCESS-ESM1-5, HadGEM2-ES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx119" id="text.69"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GOCART</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GEOS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx15" id="text.70"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SPRINTARS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MIROC-ES2L</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90 bib1.bibx32" id="text.71"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(Unnamed)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OsloCTM3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.72"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CanAM5.1-PAM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx16" id="text.73"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">BB2006high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ATRAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CAM5-ATRAS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.74"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MAM4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CESM1, E3SM-1-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx101" id="text.75"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MASINGAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MRI-ESM2-0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113" id="text.76"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OsloAero6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NorESM2-LM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.77"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Alternate recommendation from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.78"/> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLOMAP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">UKESM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.79"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HAM-M7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECHAM-HAM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.80"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SALSA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ECHAM-SALSA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.81"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TM5-mp3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EC-Earth3-AerChem</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="text.82"/>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Spectral dependence of the BCRI schemes</title>
      <p id="d2e1749">The four schemes span a range of absorption, which can be quantified by the wavelength-dependent absorption function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.83"/>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Im</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Higher values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate an increased tendency for absorption, and the mass absorption cross section of an aerosol is a linear function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> although the details of this relationship depend on aerosol morphology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.84"/>.  At all wavelengths, the dA1991 scheme has the lowest absorption and the Besc2016 the highest. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the first three schemes increases to both the ultraviolet and infrared, while the Besc2016 scheme decreases slightly to the infrared. All four schemes are fairly constant through the visible and near-infrared <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.85"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1861">Although our experiments vary the BCRI at all wavelengths, our analysis predominantly focuses on the characteristics of these schemes at 550 nm. This is the wavelength for which Earth system models typically publish aerosol optical data and for which many satellite retrievals are available. In a complementary analysis, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.86"/> assess the optical properties of BC in the dA1991, BB2006high, and Besc2016 schemes, including the  dependence on wavelength, particle size, and mixing state. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.87"/> analysis relies on theoretical calculations and a one-dimensional radiative transfer model, while the work presented here explores the impacts of the BCRI on Earth system model simulations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>CanAM5.1-PAM</title>
      <p id="d2e1887">The Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.88"><named-content content-type="pre">CanAM5;</named-content></xref> is the atmospheric component of the Canadian Earth System Model  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.89"><named-content content-type="post">CanESM5</named-content></xref>. Here we use CanAM5.1, which contains a number of technical and process representation updates as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.90"/>. Most importantly for aerosol modeling, these updates eliminate the occasional formation of spurious tropospheric dust storms seen in CanESM5.</p>
      <p id="d2e1903">CanAM5.1 can be run with either of two aerosol schemes: a bulk scheme, which simulates aerosol mass budgets and is used in most applications of the model, or the PLA (piecewise lognormal approximation) Aerosol Model (PAM), which we use here. PAM uses the PLA  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.91"/> method to simulate aerosol size distributions using a series of truncated, non-overlapping lognormal modes within specified aerosol size sections. Each truncated mode has a specified geometric standard deviation; the magnitudes and mode radii are calculated from the predicted mean masses and number concentrations in each mode at each time step.</p>
      <p id="d2e1909">Black carbon and organic carbon are emitted as externally mixed, hydrophobic aerosol, represented by one mode each. Upon ageing (time constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h during the day and 24 h during the night) these tracers are merged with pre-existing internally mixed aerosol, which is represented by three modes. Sulfate aerosol can form from the ternary homogeneous nucleation of water vapour, gaseous sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>), and ammonia, after which point it grows by Brownian coagulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="paren.92"/>, or by condensation of water vapour, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, and secondary organic aerosol precursor gases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.93"/>. All sulfate aerosol is contained within the three internally mixed modes and assumed to be fully neutralized by ammonium. Dust and sea salt are externally mixed and are represented by two modes each <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.94"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1970">Aerosol activation and cloud droplet growth are determined using pre-calculated solutions to the cloud droplet growth equation for an adiabatically rising air parcel near the cloud base <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="paren.95"/>. These solutions are stored in lookup tables and referenced using a numerically efficient iterative approach. The simulated cloud droplet number concentration is used to compute the effective radius of the cloud droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.96"/> according to the first indirect effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.97"/>. In the model configuration used here, the second indirect effect is included via the autoconversion of cloud to rain droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.98"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1986">Aerosol sinks in PAM include dry deposition, which depends on ground-surface properties and the near-surface aerosol concentration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117" id="paren.99"/>; wet deposition by below-cloud scavenging <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.100"/>; and in-cloud scavenging in convective and layer clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx99" id="paren.101"/>. Both below-cloud and in-cloud wet deposition rates are proportional to the precipitation formation rate.</p>
      <p id="d2e1998">Aerosol optical properties in PAM are determined from pre-computed lookup tables. The tables are generated using Mie theory to determine optical properties as a function of relative humidity, wavelength, and particle size. Although the assumption of spherical particles may be inappropriate for freshly emitted BC, the majority of the BC simulated by an Earth system model is hours to days old and will be relatively compact and/or internally mixed, making Mie theory a reasonable approximation. For internally mixed aerosol an effective refractive index is computed using the Maxwell-Garnett approximation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="paren.102"/>, which has been demonstrated to describe the optical properties of coated BC better than volume-weighted or core-shell approximations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.103"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2007">Other treatments of aerosol morphology and mixing state would likely yield different absolute values of simulated AAOD and ERFari. However, the focus of this work is on the difference in these quantities between simulations conducted with different BCRI schemes with other parameterizations held  constant. As it is, CanAM5.1-PAM's simulated AAOD is in good agreement with other Earth system models and with observations to the extent that the latter can be determined given the associated uncertainties (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F4"/>). The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.104"/> report found that CanAM5-PAM reproduced the observed vertical profile of BC in both the Arctic and northern midlatitudes particularly well, relative to other models.</p>
      <p id="d2e2015">In the simulations conducted for this analysis, transient historical sea surface temperatures and sea ice concentrations were specified using the PCMDI observational dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92" id="paren.105"/>,  and historical sea ice thicknesses for the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere were taken from PIOMAS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="paren.106"/> and ORAP5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120" id="paren.107"/> reanalyses respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Experimental design</title>
      <p id="d2e2035">We simulate four sets of “core ensembles”: one control ensemble and one perturbed ensemble for each of the BCRIs described above. Each ensemble consists of nine short simulations (2014–2019) and one long simulation (1949–2019). The first year of each is discarded as spinup. In the control ensemble, all emissions of aerosols and greenhouse gases are transient; in the perturbed ensemble, BC emissions are fixed at 1850 levels,  while other emissions evolve as in the control scenario. ERF is then calculated from the difference in top-of-atmosphere flux between pairs of control and perturbed runs, following the “ERF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>trans” method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.108"/>. This method of calculating ERF is chosen over the alternative approach in which the control scenario uses preindustrial emissions and the perturbed scenario adds transient emissions of the forcer of interest because the latter method does not account for interactions between species. Finally, the total BC ERF is decomposed into contributions from aerosol–radiation (ERFari), aerosol–cloud (ERFaci), and albedo (ERFalb) interactions following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.109"/>. In this work we exclusively consider shortwave ERF. Longwave BC ERF is small in CanAM5.1-PAM, consistent with previous findings for models that do not parameterize aerosol impacts on ice- and mixed-phase clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.110"/>. Although PAM includes representations of the albedo effects on BC deposited on snow and ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.111"/> and absorption of solar radiation by BC-containing cloud droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.112"/>, in this work we only vary the refractive index of atmospheric BC. ERFaci and ERFalb are thus expected to be similar between the three core ensembles.</p>
      <p id="d2e2061">The influence of the BCRI on AAOD, ERFari, and tropospheric temperature is quantified by comparing these fields between the four core ensembles. We then compare the changes in ensemble-median AAOD and ERFari that arise from the choice of BCRI to the variation in comparison datasets due to other factors.  This comparison is not intended as a comprehensive analysis of BC uncertainties but rather presents an illustrative sample of relevant uncertainties other than the BCRI.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Comparison datasets</title>
      <p id="d2e2072">To contextualize the sensitivity of AAOD and ERFari to variations in the BCRI, we consider three different comparison datasets characterizing aspects of the uncertainties in these quantities.</p>
      <p id="d2e2075">Our first comparison investigates the impact that recent updates to aerosol emission inventories have on simulated AAOD. In the core ensembles, anthropogenic aerosol emissions are taken from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) 21 April 2021 release <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.113"/>. CEDSv2021 emissions not only extend the historical emissions used in CMIP6 to more recent years but also include several back corrections, most notably reducing the emissions of BC, organic carbon, and sulfur dioxide over China <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx105" id="paren.114"/>. Biomass burning emissions in the core ensembles are taken from the CMIP6 historical inventory for 1950–2014 and the Global Fire Emissions Database <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="paren.115"><named-content content-type="pre">GFED v4.1s;</named-content></xref> for 2015–2019. To investigate the impact of these selections, we run a single simulation forced with the more commonly used CMIP6 historical and SSP2-4.5 anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions, otherwise identical to the low-absorption core ensemble. We compare the AAOD from this simulation against each realization of the low-absorption ensemble in turn, yielding a nine-member ensemble of differences. We emphasize that this comparison does not represent the total uncertainty in either anthropogenic or biomass burning aerosol emissions, as we are comparing two versions of the same anthropogenic emissions inventory and extending the biomass burning emissions with the same observational product as was used in the creation of the CMIP6 historical and SSP inventories. Instead this comparison shows the sensitivity of AAOD to recent improvements in both sets of emissions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2089">Our second comparison considers observational uncertainty. We compare estimates of AAOD from the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.116"><named-content content-type="pre">MISR;</named-content></xref> and the Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances instrument with the Generalized Retrieval of Atmosphere and Surface Properties algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.117"><named-content content-type="pre">POLDER-GRASP;</named-content></xref>, selected for their availability in level 3 gridded format. MISR and POLDER-GRASP bracket the range of AAOD simulated by current Earth system models (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F4"/>). We consider satellite observations rather than ground-based or in situ measurements due to the challenge in comparing point-source data against gridded model results <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx82" id="paren.118"/>.  POLDER-GRASP data are not available for the 2015–2019 study period, so we instead compare these satellites over the 5-year period of  2007–2011. The difference between MISR results for 2015–2019 and 2007–2011 is substantially smaller than the difference between MISR and POLDER-GRASP data for 2007–2011, indicating that the use of these alternate years is unlikely to affect our conclusions. This comparison is not intended to be a detailed evaluation of the uncertainty in remotely sensed AAOD; such assessments can be found in, for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.119"/>. Instead it provides an estimate of the range of AAOD that can be obtained from different instruments. As such it does not account for differences in sampling between the two satellites or between the observed and simulated AAOD fields.</p>
      <p id="d2e2110">Our final comparison considers the range of AAOD and ERFari reported in recent multimodel assessments from the literature. This comparison folds in many sources of model uncertainty, including differences in the treatment of mixing state which has been shown to have a substantial impact on simulated BC absorption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.120"/>, as well as differences in the parameterization of aerosol transport and deposition. The individual assessments are described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2121">Maps show ensemble-median 2015–2019 mean AAOD in the <bold>(a)</bold> low-absorption dA1991 ensemble, <bold>(b)</bold> BB2006low minus dA1991 ensemble, <bold>(c)</bold> BB2006high minus dA1991 ensemble, and <bold>(d)</bold> Besc2016 minus dA1991 ensemble. Stippling in <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold>, and <bold>(d)</bold> indicates regions where the difference between time-averaged ensembles is statistically significant at the 5 % level according to a two-sided Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test; the global-mean AAOD differences are statistically significant in all three cases. Time series show global-mean AAOD in the four BCRI ensembles over <bold>(e)</bold> 1950–2019 and <bold>(f)</bold> 2015–2019. Panel <bold>(g)</bold> compares the difference in ensemble-median 2015–2019 mean AAOD between low- and high-absorption ensembles (dark pink; dA1991 to BB2006high in solid colour, dA1991 to Besc2016 hatched) to the spread in AAOD obtained from simulations using different emission inventories (gold) and to the range in remotely sensed AAOD from different satellites (teal) in eight different geographic regions, as well as to the overall range in AAOD from AeroCom Phase III models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.121"/> for the near-global region only (indigo). Shaded envelopes in panels <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> and error bars in panel <bold>(g)</bold> denote the 5th–95th percentile range across ensembles.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Absorption aerosol optical depth</title>
      <p id="d2e2197">Modifying the BCRI directly modifies BC absorption, and we thus begin by assessing its impact on AAOD (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Increasing BC absorption from the dA1991 scheme to the BB2006low scheme increases global-mean 2015–2019 AAOD by 27 %, increasing from dA1991 to BB2006high increases AAOD by 42 %, and increasing from dA1991 to Besc2016 increases AAOD by 59 %. Absolute increases are, unsurprisingly, largest over major source regions, but the medium- and high-absorption ensembles are statistically significantly different from the low-absorption ensemble everywhere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b, c, d). The four ensembles of global-mean AAOD are clearly separated, with no overlap between annual-mean AAOD (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e) and little overlap between monthly-mean AAOD (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>f). As absorption increases, so too does the magnitude of the trend in AAOD over 1950–2019 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e).</p>
      <p id="d2e2210">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>g compares the regional increases in AAOD from varying the BCRI to the increases obtained by varying the aerosol emissions and to the differences in observed AAOD from the MISR and POLDER-GRASP satellites. Two BCRI-induced changes are shown: solid bars give the AAOD difference between dA1991 and BB2006high ensembles and hashed bars the difference between dA1991 and Besc2016. Region definitions are provided in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>. The “near-global” and “Northern Hemisphere” domains exclude latitudes poleward of 60° where the satellite retrievals are poorly sampled. Most of the regional variation in the increase in AAOD caused by varying the BCRI comes from differences in the local BC burden (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F5"/>); the relative increase is fairly consistent, varying from 39 %–47 % when comparing BB2006high to dA1991.</p>
      <p id="d2e2219">The choice of aerosol emission inventory has the greatest impact in regions where the two inventories are the most different and where the baseline emissions are high. The largest emissions-based AAOD increase, both in absolute terms and relative to the BCRI-induced increase, occurs in East Asia where both conditions are satisfied; the smallest occurs in South Asia where the two inventories are nearly identical. These regional increases are a factor of 1.5 larger than, and a factor of 16 smaller than, the AAOD differences between dA1991 and BB2006high ensembles respectively. The 60° S–60° N average change resulting from the updated emissions is approximately 60 % of the BCRI increase. Note that these values do not indicate the overall uncertainty in global or local emissions, only the spatial distribution of updates to the inventories being considered. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.122"/> report a factor of 7 difference in Southeast Asian biomass burning emissions from different inventories (a more accurate representation of emission uncertainties in this region), whereas we see almost no change between the inventory versions considered in this assessment.</p>
      <p id="d2e2225">In all regions the range of AAOD between different satellites is substantially larger than the range of simulated AAOD in CanAM5.1-PAM under different configurations. This is expected given the challenges in constraining remotely sensed AAOD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.123"/>. Even so, in regions where the BC burden is high the impact of the BCRI on AAOD can be as much as two-thirds as large as the difference between satellites. Averaged over the near-global domain, the inter-satellite discrepancy is a factor of 5 larger than the AAOD difference between dA1991 and Besc2016. The satellite differences are expected to be largest in regions where characteristics of the geography increase retrieval uncertainty (e.g. regions with more reflective surfaces) and in regions where the satellites differ in their sensitivity to the dominant aerosol type.</p>
      <p id="d2e2232">Finally, for the near-global domain only we compare with the spread in global-mean AAOD from AeroCom Phase III models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.124"/>. AeroCom Phase III estimates of the global-mean AAOD in simulations forced with 2010 emissions range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for an overall range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or approximately 6 times that obtained by varying the BCRI alone. This is similar to the range of AAOD between satellites, and as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F4"/>, the distribution of zonal-mean AeroCom Phase III AAOD is approximately bracketed by the zonal-mean AAOD from MISR and POLDER-GRASP. The 15 AeroCom models have BCRI values ranging from our dA1991 to BB2006high schemes, but the BCRI alone does not explain the intermodel spread, as discussed further in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2297">Overall, the sensitivity of simulated AAOD to the choice of a BCRI is comparable to its sensitivity to recent updates to the aerosol emission inventory within the same model. Between models, or between satellites, the global-mean AAOD spread is a factor of 5 to 7 larger.</p>
      <p id="d2e2300">Despite the fact that BC generally makes up a small fraction of total aerosol extinction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.125"/>, we do see regionally significant increases in total aerosol optical depth (AOD) when BC absorption is increased (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>). These changes are particularly evident in central and southern Africa, South America, and the northern latitudes. These are all regions with high emissions from biomass burning, which are associated with a higher ratio of BC emissions. Heavily polluted regions, such as South and East Asia, do not show an AOD dependence on a BCRI,  likely because AOD in these regions is dominated by sulfate. There is not a statistically significant difference between globally averaged AOD in the four core ensembles.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2310"><bold>(a–f)</bold> Like Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> but for BC ERFari. Thick lines in <bold>(e)</bold> show 11-year rolling means. Panel <bold>(g)</bold> compares the difference in BC ERFari between low- and high-absorption ensembles (dA1991 to BB2006high in solid colour, dA1991 to Besc2016 hatched) to the multimodel range from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="text.126"/> assessment (blue) and to the  statistical uncertainty in the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.127"/> assessment (tan). The global-mean increase of 0.09 W m<sup>−2</sup> referenced in the title of panel <bold>(c)</bold> does not match the median increase of 0.11 W m<sup>−2</sup> shown in panel <bold>(f)</bold> because panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the difference between ensemble medians, whereas panel <bold>(f)</bold> shows the ensemble distribution of global-mean differences between individual realizations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Aerosol–radiation forcing</title>
      <p id="d2e2380">The BCRI directly affects the interaction of BC with incoming solar radiation and therefore the aerosol–radiation forcing ERFari. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> summarizes the variation in shortwave BC ERFari across our four ensembles.</p>
      <p id="d2e2385">Increasing BC absorption from the dA1991 scheme to the BB2006low scheme increases global-mean 2015–2019 BC ERFari by 32 %, increasing from dA1991 to BB2006high increases BC ERFari by 47 %, and increasing from dA1991 to Besc2016 increases BC ERFari by 100 %. These increases are largely confined to the Northern Hemisphere, and for the BB2006high and Besc2016 ensembles, they are statistically significant in most regions where the dA1991 BC ERFari is significantly nonzero (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c, d). Global-mean BC ERFari values in the BB2006low, BB2006high, and Besc2016 ensembles are significantly different from the dA1991 ensemble at the 5 % level.  There is more interannual variability in the time series of global-mean BC ERFari than there is in AAOD, likely due to the dependence of ERFari on cloud fields (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e, f). Despite this variability, ERFari trends over 1950–2019 increase with the BCRI as the AAOD trends do.</p>
      <p id="d2e2393">The uncertainty in BC ERFari attributable to the choice of the BCRI can be compared to results from two recent literature assessments. We first compare with the multimodel range of BC ERFari assessed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="text.128"/>  and then with the statistical uncertainty in BC ERFari reported by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP) 2021 report. We emphasize that these are fundamentally different quantities with different interpretations. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="text.129"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.130"/> estimate ERF for different time periods, assuming different emission inventories, and using different methodology in their calculations, so the studies' best estimates are not directly comparable to our results or to each other. The comparisons are nevertheless useful in contextualizing how much of an impact uncertainty in the BCRI has on that of BC ERFari.</p>
      <p id="d2e2405"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="text.131"/> calculated ERF for numerous aerosol and greenhouse gas species for 1850–2014 based on results from AerChemMIP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.132"/>. Eight models provided estimates of total BC ERF,  but only four decomposed this ERF into contributions from radiation, cloud, and surface albedo forcings. These four models (CNRM-ESM2, MRI-ESM2, NorESM2, and UKESM1) simulated BC ERFari of 0.37, 0.13, 0.35, and 0.26 W m<sup>−2</sup> respectively for an overall range of 0.24 W m<sup>−2</sup>. This is a factor of 1.3 (2.6) larger than the difference in ERFari simulated by our dA1991 and Besc2016 (BB2006high) ensembles. The four models use a narrow range of the high-absorption BCRI: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MRI-ESM2 and NorESM2), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (UKESM), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CNRM-ESM2). The assessed range thus did not stem primarily from differences in the BCRI, although differences in the treatment of mixing states could still result in different levels of BC absorption. The results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="text.133"/> provide the basis for the assessed BC ERFari in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment report, AR6 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.134"/>; as AR6 did not itself quote an uncertainty range for BC ERFari, we do not otherwise include it in this comparison.</p>
      <p id="d2e2532"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.135"/> assessed radiative forcing for 1850–2015 using a different aerosol emission inventory than <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="text.136"/>. Five models contributed data for BC ERF, but only two provided the decomposition into ERFari: MRI-ESM2 and CanAM5-PAM, with BCRI values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively (equivalent to the BB2006high and dA1991 schemes assessed here). The reported ERFari derived from these two models was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<sup>−2</sup>. Unlike the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="text.137"/> and AeroCom results discussed above, this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<sup>−2</sup> is an estimate of statistical uncertainty rather than a multimodel range. It represents the precision to which ERFari can be determined when derived from 100-year integrations of two Earth system models. The overall uncertainty range of 0.08 W m<sup>−2</sup> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 % of the spread we obtain by varying the BCRI across the same range within one model, suggesting that a different choice of BCRI in either model could have materially impacted the assessed ERFari.</p>
      <p id="d2e2668">Varying the BCRI, and thus the absorption, of atmospheric BC is found not to have a statistically significant impact on the aerosol–cloud forcing in this experiment. We did not vary the BCRI within cloud droplets, so the only impact on clouds would be via the impact of changes in atmospheric temperature profiles, discussed below. These changes are found to be small relative to the variability in simulated cloud fields. Similarly, the radiative forcing from albedo changes was not found to vary with BCRI scheme because we did not vary the refractive index of BC deposited on snow and ice. The only change in the total BC ERF was thus from the aerosol–radiation component. For the BB2006low and BB2006high schemes, this change was too small to result in a statistically significant increase in total ERF. However, the Besc2016 scheme led to a statistically significant increase in global-mean BC ERF relative to the dA1991 scheme, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<sup>−2</sup>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2705">Atmospheric temperature differences obtained by increasing the absorption of BC from that in the dA1991 scheme to that in the BB2006high scheme <bold>(a, c)</bold> or the Besc2016 scheme <bold>(b, d)</bold>. <bold>(a, b)</bold> Vertical profile of zonal-mean temperature differences. <bold>(c, d)</bold> Spatial distribution of temperature differences at 850 hPa. Stippling indicates statistically significant temperature anomalies.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Temperature and precipitation</title>
      <p id="d2e2734">Black carbon influences global and regional temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx100" id="paren.138"/>, mean and extreme precipitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.139"/>, and the Asian monsoon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx106 bib1.bibx110" id="paren.140"/>. The sensitivity of these fields to the BCRI cannot be assessed in this study as the four ensembles used the same set of prescribed sea surface temperatures. We can, however, examine temperature changes from the radiative heating of the atmosphere by BC in the mid- and upper troposphere and draw on other works to estimate potential precipitation changes.</p>
      <p id="d2e2746">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> illustrates the vertical distribution of temperature changes obtained by varying the BCRI. Although near-surface air temperatures are constrained by the prescribed sea surface temperatures, statistically significant zonal-mean warming is evident over the northern midlatitudes starting at about 850 hPa. At 600 hPa and above, this warming is mostly confined to regions above and downwind of East and South Asia (not shown); at lower altitudes, significant warming is also apparent over or downwind of Africa and South America. Large temperature responses are apparent at the poles in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a and b, but note that these changes are not statistically significant and that they correspond to small geographic areas. The mid-tropospheric warming does not appear sufficient to impact local cloudiness in our model: there are not statistically significant differences between the low- and high-absorption cloud fractions at these levels.</p>
      <p id="d2e2753">To estimate the potential impact of the BCRI on precipitation, we draw on the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.141"/>,  who derived an expression for global-mean precipitation suppression as a function of changes in AAOD:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M104" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>dAbs</mml:mtext></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>dAbs</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dAAOD</mml:mtext></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AAOD</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4646</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">unit</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAOD</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the precipitation rate (in mm yr<sup>−1</sup>) and “Abs” denotes atmospheric absorption, defined as the difference between top-of-atmosphere and surface radiative forcings (in units of W m<sup>−2</sup>). A numerical estimate of the first factor in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) was derived from historical simulations in AeroCom Phase II and CMIP6 models, and the second factor was drawn from the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.142"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.143"/>. Applying Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) to the global-mean ensemble-median increase in AAOD obtained by changing from the dA1991 to BB2006high scheme yields an estimated precipitation suppression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm yr<sup>−1</sup>. It is extremely unlikely that this signal would be detectable in the global mean in our simulations. It is possible, however, that regional changes could be considerably larger.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e2922">We have demonstrated that increasing the BCRI across the range of values commonly used in the climate modeling literature can increase global-mean AAOD by 42 % and BC ERFari by 47 %, and using a more recent estimate of the BCRI can increase global-mean AAOD by 59 % and BC ERFari by 100 %.  The resulting increase in the absorption of solar radiation can increase temperatures in the mid- and upper troposphere by as much as 0.4 °C over major BC source regions, even without considering the potential impacts of BC on sea surface temperatures and sea ice which we have not addressed. For these key BC-relevant fields, therefore, the choice of  the  BCRI is an important and perhaps underappreciated one.</p>
      <p id="d2e2925">In order to motivate their review on constraining global and regional aerosol absorption, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.144"/> briefly explored the effects of modifying the optical properties of BC in CESM1.2. They modified the BCRI by an amount sufficient to increase the resulting AAOD by approximately 1 standard deviation of the reported AAOD range from AeroCom Phase II <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.145"/>. Although they do not report the change in the BCRI that was necessary to obtain this increase, the result was an increase in AAOD from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or 43 %), almost identical to the difference between our dA1991 and BB2006high ensembles. This increase in absorption led to a global-mean instantaneous ERF of 0.2 W m<sup>−2</sup> relative to the control configuration. In our analysis the median increase in total BC ERF between these BCRI schemes was 0.1 W m<sup>−2</sup>, but this increase was not statistically different from zero.</p>
      <p id="d2e3015">Diversity in simulated aerosol absorption in AeroCom Phase III models was investigated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.146"/>. As referenced in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>, AeroCom Phase III models exhibited a wide range of absorption, with global-mean AAOD attributable to BC ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.147"/> demonstrated that the models did not display a clear relationship between BCRI and overall absorption because aerosol absorption is not purely a function of the BCRI but rather the result of many competing and uncertain processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.148"/>. The authors attribute the AeroCom Phase III spread to three main factors: diversity in the simulated mass load, which ranged from 0.13 to 0.51 mg m<sup>−2</sup>, driven by differences in deposition processes and thus in aerosol lifetime; diversity in the prescribed density of black carbon, which ranged from 1.0 to 2.3 g cm<sup>−3</sup>; and diversity in the BCRI, which ranged from 1.75–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 1.95–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These three factors contributed similarly to the overall model spread. There was also substantial diversity in the treatment of mixing state, both in terms of the mixing itself and in the calculation of resultant effective optical properties of the mixture, between the participating models.  Between the diversity in effective refractive index due to differences in absorption enhancement from mixing and the diversity of assumed BC density, the correlation between the BCRI and the  mass absorption cross section was found to be low (0.2). Thus while the BCRI is an influential parameter choice when all else is held equal, its impact is modulated by the competing effects of other parameterizations.</p>
      <p id="d2e3110">We have assessed four BCRI schemes here, but many others exist. As well as the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.149"/> scheme assessed here, the review by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.150"/> highlighted the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="text.151"/> values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">635</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.03</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">635</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.365</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as being consistent with current estimates of the absorption function. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107" id="text.152"/> reported measurements at 635 and 1310 nm and did not extrapolate to other wavelengths, but assuming a relatively flat <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through the visible range, this would indicate a degree of absorption somewhere between our BB2006high and Besc2016 schemes. Other estimates which have been widely used in the combustion science literature, such as the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.153"/> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all visible wavelengths or the more recent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.154"/> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1064</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, also yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values between BB2006high and Besc2016 but low enough that they are not recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.155"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3283">Refractive indices determined from laboratory measurements may not be representative of atmospheric black carbon. For instance, BC generated by a simple, clean laboratory flame will likely have a different temperature history – and thus, different optical and structural properties – than that generated by the more complex sources responsible for most atmospheric BC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.156"/>. Combustion experiments also measure freshly emitted particles, which may have substantial morphological differences from atmospheric BC that is hours to days old. The recent work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.157"/>, who measured the refractive indices of atmospheric BC particles sampled during a scientific cruise in the northwest Pacific,  may be more suitable for use in climate models. By combining their optical measurements with the constraints imposed by the accepted mass absorption cross section of BC, they obtained a range of plausible refractive indices suitable for describing atmospheric BC. Their recommended value, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">633</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">633</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.297</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, also falls between the BB2006high and Besc2016 schemes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e3354">The radiative forcing of black carbon is subject to many complex, interconnected sources of uncertainty. We have isolated one key factor, the BC refractive index (BCRI), and demonstrated its impact on the simulation of several fields. With all other parameterizations held equal, increasing the BCRI across the range of values commonly used in Earth system models (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can increase global-mean AAOD by 42 % and BC ERFari by 47 %. A more recent laboratory estimate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">532</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, serves as a likely upper limit to the absorption of atmospheric BC; it yields AAOD and BC ERFari increases of 59 % and 100 % respectively relative to the low-absorption case. The impacts of varying the BCRI on AAOD are comparable to the effects of recent updates to anthropogenic and biomass burning aerosol emission inventories, and in BC source regions, the difference in AAOD between low- and high-absorption ensembles is up to two-thirds as large as the difference in AAOD retrieved from MISR and POLDER-GRASP satellites. The increase in BC ERFari is comparable to the uncertainty in recent literature estimates. While we do not attribute the spread in previous model estimates of AAOD and ERFari to diversity in the BCRI – rather, the multimodel spread arises from a combination of BC parameter choices including the BCRI and density, the treatment of mixing and ageing, and the parameterization of transport and deposition processes, among other factors – the similar magnitude emphasizes the importance of considering BCRI choices in model development and multimodel comparisons.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>CanAM5.1-PAM evaluation</title>
      <p id="d2e3457">The AAOD simulated by CanAM5.1-PAM is compared with that from AeroCom Phase III models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.158"/> and satellite retrievals in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F4"/>.</p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F4"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e3467">The 2015–2019 zonal mean (left column) and seasonal cycle (right column) of AAOD in PAM ensembles (coloured lines), satellite retrievals (yellow envelopes), and AeroCom Phase III models as reported in Fig. 2 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.159"/> (pink envelope). For PAM models, individual lines denote individual realizations, averaged over 2015–2019. For satellites, the width of the envelope shows the min–max range over the 5 years in question (2015–2019 for MISR, the lower envelope, and 2006–2010 for POLDER-GRASP, the higher envelope). The AeroCom Phase II envelope indicates the full min–max range across models for simulations forced with 2010 emissions. PAM is generally in closer agreement with MISR than POLDER-GRASP and within the range of both zonal means and seasonal cycles simulated by AeroCom Phase III models.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025-f04.png"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Region definitions</title>
      <p id="d2e3491">The regions used in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.F6"/> are defined in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.T3"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F5"/> shows these region boundaries overlaid on a map of black carbon burden from the low-BCRI ensemble.</p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F5"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d2e3504">Black carbon burden (ensemble-median 2015–2019 mean) in the low-BCRI ensemble, with analysis regions indicated in blue. Not shown are the near-global (60° S–60° N) and Northern Hemisphere (0–60° N) domains. Region definitions are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.T3"/>.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

<table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S2.T3"><label>Table B1</label><caption><p id="d2e3521">Definitions of the regions used in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.F6"/> and shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F5"/>. The East Asia and South Asia definitions are taken from the SREX regions used in IPCC AR5, and the Central Africa region combines the SREX regions EAF and WAF (excluding the portion of WAF west of the prime meridian).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Longitude range [°]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Latitude range [°]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Near-global</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0, 360</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Northern Hemisphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0, 360</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0, 60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">East Asia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100, 145</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20, 50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South Asia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60, 100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5, 30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0,  35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35, 60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">USA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">235, 290</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25, 50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Central Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0,  40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">280, 325</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title>Total AOD results</title>
      <p id="d2e3693">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.F6"/> reproduces Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> but for total AOD.</p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S3.F6"><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d2e3702">Like Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> but for total aerosol optical depth. The BCRI has regionally significant impacts on AOD,  but the global mean does not differ significantly between low- and high-absorption ensembles. In panel <bold>(g)</bold>, AOD retrievals are taken from MISR, the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.160"><named-content content-type="pre">MODIS;</named-content></xref>, comparing Aqua and Terra results separately, and the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="altparen.161"/>). The AOD range is calculated as the difference between the highest and lowest regional mean values, which in all regions considered turns out to be the difference between MODIS Terra and MISR respectively.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3109/2025/acp-25-3109-2025-f06.png"/>

      </fig>


</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e3734">The full CanESM5 source code is publicly available at <uri>https://gitlab.com/cccma/canesm/</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.162"/>.  Simulation data used in this project are available at <uri>https://crd-data-donnees-rdc.ec.gc.ca/CCCMA/publications/2025_Digby_black_carbon_refractive_index/</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.163"/>.  Figures were created using Matplotlib version 3.7.1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.164"/>, available under the Matplotlib license at <uri>https://matplotlib.org/</uri> (last access: 22 January 2025; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="altparen.165"/>) and <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7697899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7697899</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.166"/>. The analysis scripts are available via Zenodo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.167"><named-content content-type="pre"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14715011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14715011</ext-link>,</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <p id="d2e3772">Several datasets were used to develop the aerosol emission inventories in this work. Anthropogenic emissions for the core ensembles were taken from the CEDS v2021-04-21 data release <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.168"><named-content content-type="pre"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4741285</ext-link>,</named-content></xref>. Biomass burning emissions for 2015–2019 for the core ensembles were taken from GFEDv4.1s, described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="text.169"/> and available at <uri>https://www.geo.vu.nl/~gwerf/GFED/GFED4/</uri>. CMIP6 anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions are available from the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) at <uri>https://aims2.llnl.gov/search/input4mips/</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.170"/>.</p>

      <p id="d2e3794">MISR satellite observations are available via the NASA Langley Atmospheric Science Data Center <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.171"><named-content content-type="pre"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Terra/MISR/MIL3MAEN_L3.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/Terra/MISR/MIL3MAEN_L3.004</ext-link>,</named-content></xref>. POLDER-GRASP observations are available from the POLDER Data Release site <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.172"><named-content content-type="pre"><uri>https://www.grasp-open.com/products/polder-data-release/</uri>,</named-content></xref>; the “compnents” product was used in this analysis. Level 3 monthly data at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° resolution were used for both datasets.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e3828">RARD led the study design, analysis, and writing, with support and supervision from KvS, AHM, and NPG. JL provided data and developed the components of CanAM-PAM that allow the refractive index of BC to be varied.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e3834">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e3840">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e3846">The authors thank Jérôme Yon for providing spectrally resolved data for the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.173"/> refractive index and Jason Cole and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e3854">This work has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (grant no. RGPIN-2019-204986 to Adam H. Monahan and grant no. RGPIN-2017-04043 to Nathan P. Gillett), as well as a  CGS-D award to Ruth A. R. Digby.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e3861">This paper was edited by Rebecca Garland and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adachi et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Chung, S. H., and Buseck, P. R.: Shapes of soot aerosol particles and implications for their effects on climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D15206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012868</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>AMAP(2021)</label><mixed-citation> AMAP: AMAP Assessment 2021: Impacts of Short-lived Climate Forcers on Arctic Climate, Air Quality, and Human Health, Tech. rep., Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Tromsø, Norway, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Andrews et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., Kinne, S., and Samset, B.: Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6041–6072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bellouin et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Bellouin, N., Rae, J., Jones, A., Johnson, C., Haywood, J., and Boucher, O.: Aerosol Forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) Simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the Role of Ammonium Nitrate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D20206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016074</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bergman et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Bergman, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Korhonen, H., Lehtinen, K. J., Makkonen, R., Arola, A., Mielonen, T., Romakkaniemi, S., Kulmala, M., and Kokkola, H.: Evaluation of the sectional aerosol microphysics module SALSA implementation in ECHAM5-HAM aerosol-climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 845–868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-845-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-845-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bescond et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Bescond, A., Yon, J., Ouf, F.-X., Rozé, C., Coppalle, A., Parent, P., Ferry, D., and Laffon, C.: Soot optical properties determined by analyzing extinction spectra in the visible near-UV: Toward an optical speciation according to constituents and structure, J. Aerosol Sci., 101, 118–132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.001</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bohren and Huffman(1983)</label><mixed-citation> Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and scattering of light by small particles, Wiley, New York, ISBN 9783527618163, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bond and Bergstrom(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 27–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bond et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U., Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C. S.: Bounding the Role of Black Carbon in the Climate System: A Scientific Assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., chapter 7, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis: CanESM: The Canadian Earth System Model, GitLab [code], <uri>https://gitlab.com/cccma/canesm/</uri> (last access: 22 January 2025), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Caswell et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Caswell, T., Lee, A., Sales de Andrade, E., Droettboom, M., Hoffmann, T., Klymak, J., Hunter, J., Firing, E., Stansby, D., Varoquaux, N., Nielsen, J. H., Root, B., May, R., Gustafsson, O., Elson, P., Seppänen, J. K., Lee, J.-J., Dale, D., McDougall, H. D., Straw, A., Hobson, P., Sunden, K., Lucas, G., Gohlke, C., Vincent, A. F., Yu, T. S., Ma, E., Silvester, S., and Moad, C.: matplotlib/matplotlib: REL: v3.7.1 (v3.7.1), Zenodo [software], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7697899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7697899</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Chang and Charalampopoulos(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Chang, H.-C. and Charalampopoulos, T. T.: Determination of the wavelength dependence of refractive indices of flame soot, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 430, 577–591, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1990.0107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.1990.0107</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chin et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B., Duncan, B., Martin, R., Logan, J., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.: Tropospheric Aerosol Optical Thickness from the GOCART Model and Comparisons with Satellite and Sun Photometer Measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Colarco et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Colarco, P., da Silva, A., Chin, M., and Diehl, T.: Online simulations of global aerosol distributions in the NASA GEOS-4 model and comparisons to satellite and ground-based aerosol optical depth, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D14207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012820" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012820</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Cole et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Cole, J. N. S., von Salzen, K., Li, J., Scinocca, J., Plummer, D., Arora, V., McFarlane, N., Lazare, M., MacKay, M., and Verseghy, D.: The Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5 (CanAM5.0.3), Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5427–5448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Collins et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Collins, W. J., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Eyring, V., Hegglin, M. I., Maycock, A., Myhre, G., Prather, M., Shindell, D., and Smith, S. J.: AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 585–607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Croft et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Croft, B., Lohmann, U., and von Salzen, K.: Black carbon ageing in the Canadian Centre for Climate modelling and analysis atmospheric general circulation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1931–1949, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1931-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1931-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>d'Almeida et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation> d'Almeida, G., Koepke, P., and Shettle, E.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Global Climatology and Radiative Characteristics, A. Deepak Publishing, Hampton, VA, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Dalzell and Sarofim(1969)</label><mixed-citation>Dalzell, W. H. and Sarofim, A. F.: Optical Constants of Soot and Their Application to Heat-Flux Calculations, J. Heat Transf., 91, 100–104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3580063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1115/1.3580063</ext-link>, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Digby(2025a)</label><mixed-citation>Digby, R.: digbyr/publication-scripts-bcri: revised submission (version v2.0), Zenodo [software], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14715011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14715011</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Digby(2025b)</label><mixed-citation>Digby, R.: BCRI simulation data, CRD Data Store [data set], <uri>https://crd-data-donnees-rdc.ec.gc.ca/CCCMA/publications/2025_Digby_black_carbon_refractive_index/</uri> (last access: 22 January 2025), 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Diner et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Diner, D., Beckert, J., Reilly, T., Bruegge, C., Conel, J., Kahn, R., Martonchik, J., Ackerman, T., Davies, R., Gerstl, S., Gordon, H., Muller, J.-P., Myneni, R., Sellers, P., Pinty, B., and Verstraete, M.: Multi-Angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) Instrument Description and Experiment Overview, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 36, 1072–1087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.700992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/36.700992</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Dubovik et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O., Herman, M., Holdak, A., Lapyonok, T., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J. L., Ducos, F., Sinyuk, A., and Lopatin, A.: Statistically optimized inversion algorithm for enhanced retrieval of aerosol properties from spectral multi-angle polarimetric satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 975–1018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-975-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-975-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Dunne et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Dunne, E. M., Gordon, H., Kürten, A., Almeida, J., Duplissy, J., Williamson, C., Ortega, I. K., Pringle, K. J., Adamov, A., Baltensperger, U., Barmet, P., Benduhn, F., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Clarke, A., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Kupc, A., Lawler, M. J., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mann, G., Mathot, S., Merikanto, J., Miettinen, P., Nenes, A., Onnela, A., Rap, A., Reddington, C. L. S., Riccobono, F., Richards, N. A. D., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Stozkhov, Y., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J., Wagner, P. E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., and Carslaw, K. S.: Global atmospheric particle formation from CERN CLOUD measurements, Science, 354, 1119–1124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aaf2649</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>ESGF(2014)</label><mixed-citation>ESGF: The Earth System Grid Federation: An open infrastructure for access to distributed geospatial data, Future Generation Computer Systems, 36, 400–417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.07.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.future.2013.07.002</ext-link>, 2014 (data available at: <uri>https://aims2.llnl.gov/search/input4mips/</uri>, last access: 22 January 2025).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Flanner et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Flanner, M. G., Liu, X., Zhou, C., Penner, J. E., and Jiao, C.: Enhanced solar energy absorption by internally-mixed black carbon in snow grains, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4699–4721, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4699-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4699-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Forster et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Forster, P. M., Richardson, T., Maycock, A. C., Smith, C. J., Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Andrews, T., Pincus, R., and Schulz, M.: Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 12460–12475, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025320" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025320</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Ganguly et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Ganguly, D., Rasch, P. J., Wang, H., and Yoon, J.-H.: Climate Response of the South Asian Monsoon System to Anthropogenic Aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D13209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017508</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Ghan(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Ghan, S. J.: Technical Note: Estimating aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9971–9974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9971-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9971-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Gliß et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Schulz, M., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Benedictow, A. M. K., Bian, H., Checa-Garcia, R., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Griesfeller, J. J., Heckel, A., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Laj, P., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Lund Myhre, C., Matsui, H., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., van Noije, T., North, P., Olivié, D. J. L., Rémy, S., Sogacheva, L., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Tsyro, S. G.: AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 87–128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-87-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Hajima et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Hajima, T., Watanabe, M., Yamamoto, A., Tatebe, H., Noguchi, M. A., Abe, M., Ohgaito, R., Ito, A., Yamazaki, D., Okajima, H., Ito, A., Takata, K., Ogochi, K., Watanabe, S., and Kawamiya, M.: Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2197–2244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Hess et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.: Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 831–844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Heyn et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Heyn, I., Block, K., Mülmenstädt, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kühne, P., Salzmann, M., and Quaas, J.: Assessment of simulated aerosol effective radiative forcings in the terrestrial spectrum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 1001–1007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071975</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Hodnebrog et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Hodnebrog, Ø., Myhre, G., and Samset, B. H.: How Shorter Black Carbon Lifetime Alters Its Climate Effect, Nat. Commun., 5, 5065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms6065</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Hoesly et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Hu et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Hu, D., Alfarra, M. R., Szpek, K., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Flynn, M. J., Shao, Y., Voliotis, A., Du, M., Liu, D., Johnson, B., McFiggans, G., Haywood, J. M., Coe, H., and Allan, J.: Refractive Index of Engine-Emitted Black Carbon and the Influence of Organic Coatings on Optical Properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2023JD039178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039178" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JD039178</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Hunter(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/MCSE.2007.55</ext-link>, 2007 (code available at: <uri>https://matplotlib.org/</uri>, last access: 22 January 2025).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Janzen(1979)</label><mixed-citation>Janzen, J.: The refractive index of colloidal carbon, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 69, 436–447, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(79)90133-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9797(79)90133-4</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Kahnert(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Kahnert, M.: On the Discrepancy between Modeled and Measured Mass Absorption Cross Sections of Light Absorbing Carbon Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44, 453–460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003733834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786821003733834</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Kahnert and Kanngießer(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Kahnert, M. and Kanngießer, F.: Modelling optical properties of atmospheric black carbon aerosols, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 244, 106849, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106849" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106849</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>King et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>King, M. D., Platnick, S., Menzel, W. P., Ackerman, S. A., and Hubanks, P. A.: Spatial and temporal distribution of clouds observed by MODIS onboard the Terra and Aqua satellites, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 51, 3826–3852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227333" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227333</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Koch and Del Genio(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Koch, D. and Del Genio, A. D.: Black carbon semi-direct effects on cloud cover: review and synthesis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7685–7696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7685-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7685-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Koch et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Koch, D., Schulz, M., Kinne, S., McNaughton, C., Spackman, J. R., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T., Bond, T. C., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Clarke, A., De Luca, N., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Dubovik, O., Easter, R., Fahey, D. W., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Freitag, S., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Horowitz, L., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Klimont, Z., Kondo, Y., Krol, M., Liu, X., Miller, R., Montanaro, V., Moteki, N., Myhre, G., Penner, J. E., Perlwitz, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Sahu, L., Sakamoto, H., Schuster, G., Schwarz, J. P., Seland, Ø., Stier, P., Takegawa, N., Takemura, T., Textor, C., van Aardenne, J. A., and Zhao, Y.: Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9001–9026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9001-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9001-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Lee and Tien(1981)</label><mixed-citation>Lee, S. and Tien, C.: Optical constants of soot in hydrocarbon flames, Symposium (International) on Combustion, eighteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, 18, 1159–1166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(81)80120-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0082-0784(81)80120-8</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Li et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., von Salzen, K., Peng, Y., Zhang, H., and Liang, X.: Evaluation of black carbon semi‒direct radiative effect in a climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 4715–4728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50327</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Li et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Digby, R., and von Salzen, K.: Accounting for black carbon refractive index in atmospheric radiation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 150, 4806–4819, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4842" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.4842</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Li et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z., Lau, W. K.-M., Ramanathan, V., Wu, G., Ding, Y., Manoj, M. G., Liu, J., Qian, Y., Li, J., Zhou, T., Fan, J., Rosenfeld, D., Ming, Y., Wang, Y., Huang, J., Wang, B., Xu, X., Lee, S.-S., Cribb, M., Zhang, F., Yang, X., Zhao, C., Takemura, T., Wang, K., Xia, X., Yin, Y., Zhang, H., Guo, J., Zhai, P. M., Sugimoto, N., Babu, S. S., and Brasseur, G. P.: Aerosol and Monsoon Climate Interactions over Asia, Rev. Geophys., 54, 866–929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015RG000500</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Liu et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, F., Yon, J., Fuentes, A., Lobo, P., Smallwood, G. J., and Corbin, J. C.: Review of Recent Literature on the Light Absorption Properties of Black Carbon: Refractive Index, Mass Absorption Cross Section, and Absorption Function, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54, 33–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1676878" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1676878</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Liu et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W., Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 709–739, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Lohmann and Feichter(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Lund et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Lund, M., Samset, B., Skeie, R., Watson-Parris, D., Katich, J., Schwarz, J., and Weinzierl, B.: Short Black Carbon lifetime inferred from a global set of aircraft observations, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1, 31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Ma et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Ma, X., von Salzen, K., and Li, J.: Modelling sea salt aerosol and its direct and indirect effects on climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1311–1327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1311-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1311-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Mackowski(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Mackowski, D. W.: Electrostatics analysis of radiative absorption by sphere clusters in the Rayleigh limit: application to soot particles, Appl. Optics, 34, 3535–3545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.003535" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.34.003535</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Mackowski and Mishchenko(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Mackowski, D. W. and Mishchenko, M. I.: Calculation of the T matrix and the scattering matrix for ensembles of spheres, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 13, 2266–2278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.13.002266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/JOSAA.13.002266</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Matsui(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Matsui, H.: Development of a global aerosol model using a two-dimensional sectional method: 1. Model design, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 9, 1921–1947, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000936" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017MS000936</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Menna and D'Alessio(1982)</label><mixed-citation>Menna, P. and D'Alessio, A.: Light scattering and extinction coefficients for soot-forming flames in the wavelength range from 200 nm to 600 nm, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 19, 1421–1428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(82)80319-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0082-0784(82)80319-6</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Mie(1908)</label><mixed-citation>Mie, G.: Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen, Annalen der Physik, 330, 377–445, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19083300302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/andp.19083300302</ext-link>, 1908.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Moteki et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., and Nakamura, S.-I.: Method to measure refractive indices of small nonspherical particles: Application to black carbon particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 513–521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Moteki et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Moteki, N., Ohata, S., Yoshida, A., and Adachi, K.: Constraining the complex refractive index of black carbon particles using the complex forward-scattering amplitude, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 57, 678–699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2202243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2023.2202243</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Myhre et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Berglen, T. F., Johnsrud, M., Hoyle, C. R., Berntsen, T. K., Christopher, S. A., Fahey, D. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Jones, T. A., Kahn, R. A., Loeb, N., Quinn, P., Remer, L., Schwarz, J. P., and Yttri, K. E.: Modelled radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect with multi-observation evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1365–1392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1365-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1365-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Namazi et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Namazi, M., von Salzen, K., and Cole, J. N. S.: Simulation of black carbon in snow and its climate impact in the Canadian Global Climate Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10887–10904, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10887-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10887-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC(2008)</label><mixed-citation>NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: MISR Level 3 Component Global Aerosol product in netCDF format covering a month V004, ASDC – Atmospheric Science Data Center [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Terra/MISR/MIL3MAEN_L3.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/Terra/MISR/MIL3MAEN_L3.004</ext-link> 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>O'Rourke et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>O'Rourke, P., Smith, S., Mott, A., Ahsan, H., McDuffie, E., Crippa, M., Klimont, Z., MacDonald, B., Wang, S., Nicholson, M., Feng, L., and Hoesly, R.: CEDS v. 2021.04.21 gridded emissions data (Version v_2021_02_05), Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4741285</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Pan et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Pan, X., Ichoku, C., Chin, M., Bian, H., Darmenov, A., Colarco, P., Ellison, L., Kucsera, T., da Silva, A., Wang, J., Oda, T., and Cui, G.: Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 969–994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-969-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-969-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Peng et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C., Collins, D., Molina, M., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1602310113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Peng and Lohmann(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Peng, Y. and Lohmann, U.: Sensitivity study of the spectral dispersion of the cloud droplet size distribution on the indirect aerosol effect, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017192</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Peng et al.(2012)Peng, von Salzen, and Li</label><mixed-citation>Peng, Y., von Salzen, K., and Li, J.: Simulation of mineral dust aerosol with Piecewise Log-normal Approximation (PLA) in CanAM4-PAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6891–6914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6891-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6891-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Persad et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Persad, G. G., Samset, B. H., and Wilcox, L. J.: Aerosols Must Be Included in Climate Risk Assessments, Nature, 611, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03763-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/d41586-022-03763-9</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Platnick et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Platnick, S., King, M., and Hubanks, P.: MODIS Atmosphere L3 Monthly Product, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD08_M3.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/MODIS/MOD08_M3.061</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>POLDER Data Release(2015)</label><mixed-citation>POLDER Data Release: POLDER Data Release, GraspOpen [data set], <uri>https://www.grasp-open.com/products/polder-data-release/</uri> (last access: 9 March 2023), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Purcell and Pennypacker(1973)</label><mixed-citation>Purcell, E. M. and Pennypacker, C. R.: Scattering and Absorption of Light by Nonspherical Dielectric Grains, Astrophys. J., 186, 705–714, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/152538" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/152538</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Ramachandran and Reist(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Ramachandran, G. and Reist, P. C.: Characterization of Morphological Changes in Agglomerates Subject to Condensation and Evaporation Using Multiple Fractal Dimensions, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 23, 431–442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829508965326" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829508965326</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Samset(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Samset, B. H.: Aerosol Absorption Has an Underappreciated Role in Historical Precipitation Change, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00576-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-022-00576-6</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Samset et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T. K., Bian, H., Bellouin, N., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Iversen, T., Kinne, S., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Zhang, K.: Black carbon vertical profiles strongly affect its radiative forcing uncertainty, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2423–2434, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2423-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2423-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Samset et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Forster, P. M., Hodnebrog, Ø., Andrews, T., Faluvegi, G., Fläschner, D., Kasoar, M., Kharin, V., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.-F., Olivié, D., Richardson, T., Shindell, D., Shine, K. P., Takemura, T., and Voulgarakis, A.: Fast and Slow Precipitation Responses to Individual Climate Forcers: A PDRMIP Multimodel Study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2782–2791, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL068064</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Samset et al.(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>Samset, B. H., Sand, M., Smith, C. J., Bauer, S. E., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Osprey, S., and Schleussner, C.-F.: Climate Impacts From a Removal of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1020–1029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076079</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Samset et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>Samset, B. H., Stjern, C. W., Andrews, E., Kahn, R. A., Myhre, G., Schulz, M., and Schuster, G. L.: Aerosol Absorption: Progress Towards Global and Regional Constraints, Current Climate Change Reports, 4, 65–83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0091-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40641-018-0091-4</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Sand et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Sand, M., Berntsen, T., von Salzen, K., Flanner, M., Langner, J., and Victor, D.: Response of Arctic temperature to changes in emissions of short-lived climate forcers, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 286–289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2880</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Sand et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Sand, M., Samset, B. H., Tsigaridis, K., Bauer, S. E., and Myhre, G.: Black Carbon and Precipitation: An Energetics Perspective, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD032239</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Sand et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Sand, M., Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Gliß, J., Bauer, S. E., Bian, H., Chin, M., Checa-Garcia, R., Ginoux, P., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Matsui, H., van Noije, T., Olivié, D. J. L., Remy, S., Schulz, M., Stier, P., Stjern, C. W., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., Tsyro, S. G., and Watson-Parris, D.: Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15929–15947, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Schutgens et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Schutgens, N., Dubovik, O., Hasekamp, O., Torres, O., Jethva, H., Leonard, P. J. T., Litvinov, P., Redemann, J., Shinozuka, Y., de Leeuw, G., Kinne, S., Popp, T., Schulz, M., and Stier, P.: AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6895–6917, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Seland et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Seland, Ø., Bentsen, M., Olivié, D., Toniazzo, T., Gjermundsen, A., Graff, L. S., Debernard, J. B., Gupta, A. K., He, Y.-C., Kirkevåg, A., Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J., Aas, K. S., Bethke, I., Fan, Y., Griesfeller, J., Grini, A., Guo, C., Ilicak, M., Karset, I. H. H., Landgren, O., Liakka, J., Moseid, K. O., Nummelin, A., Spensberger, C., Tang, H., Zhang, Z., Heinze, C., Iversen, T., and Schulz, M.: Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6165–6200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Sellar et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Sellar, A. A., Jones, C. G., Mulcahy, J. P., Tang, Y., Yool, A., Wiltshire, A., O'Connor, F. M., Stringer, M., Hill, R., Palmieri, J., Woodward, S., de Mora, L., Kuhlbrodt, T., Rumbold, S. T., Kelley, D. I., Ellis, R., Johnson, C. E., Walton, J., Abraham, N. L., Andrews, M. B., Andrews, T., Archibald, A. T., Berthou, S., Burke, E., Blockley, E., Carslaw, K., Dalvi, M., Edwards, J., Folberth, G. A., Gedney, N., Griffiths, P. T., Harper, A. B., Hendry, M. A., Hewitt, A. J., Johnson, B., Jones, A., Jones, C. D., Keeble, J., Liddicoat, S., Morgenstern, O., Parker, R. J., Predoi, V., Robertson, E., Siahaan, A., Smith, R. S., Swaminathan, R., Woodhouse, M. T., Zeng, G., and Zerroukat, M.: UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4513–4558, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001739</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Shettle and Fenn(1979)</label><mixed-citation> Shettle, E. P. and Fenn, R. W.: Models for the Aerosols of the Lower Atmosphere and the Effects of Humidity Variations on their Optical Properties, vol. 79, Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Sigmond et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Sigmond, M., Anstey, J., Arora, V., Digby, R., Gillett, N., Kharin, V., Merryfield, W., Reader, C., Scinocca, J., Swart, N., Virgin, J., Abraham, C., Cole, J., Lambert, N., Lee, W.-S., Liang, Y., Malinina, E., Rieger, L., von Salzen, K., Seiler, C., Seinen, C., Shao, A., Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Wang, L., and Yang, D.: Improvements in the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM) through systematic model analysis: CanESM5.0 and CanESM5.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6553–6591, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6553-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-16-6553-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Stevens and Dastoor(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Stevens, R. and Dastoor, A.: A review of the representation of aerosol mixing state in atmospheric models, Atmosphere, 10, 168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040168" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos10040168</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Swart et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Swart, N. C., Cole, J. N. S., Kharin, V. V., Lazare, M., Scinocca, J. F., Gillett, N. P., Anstey, J., Arora, V., Christian, J. R., Hanna, S., Jiao, Y., Lee, W. G., Majaess, F., Saenko, O. A., Seiler, C., Seinen, C., Shao, A., Sigmond, M., Solheim, L., von Salzen, K., Yang, D., and Winter, B.: The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4823–4873, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Szopa et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, chapter 6, pp. 817–922, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.008</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Takemura et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Takemura, T., Nakajima, T., Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., and Kinne, S.: Single-scattering albedo and radiative forcing of various aerosol species with a global three-dimensional model, J. Climate, 15, 333–352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015&lt;0333:SSAARF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015&lt;0333:SSAARF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Taylor et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, J. W., Wu, H., Szpek, K., Bower, K., Crawford, I., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Davies, N. W., Haywood, J. M., and Coe, H.: Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11201–11221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Taylor et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation> Taylor, K., Williamson, D., and Zwiers, F.: The sea surface temperature and sea-ice concentration boundary conditions for AMIP II simulations, PCMDI Report No. 60, Tech. rep., Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Tegen et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Tegen, I., Neubauer, D., Ferrachat, S., Siegenthaler-Le Drian, C., Bey, I., Schutgens, N., Stier, P., Watson-Parris, D., Stanelle, T., Schmidt, H., Rast, S., Kokkola, H., Schultz, M., Schroeder, S., Daskalakis, N., Barthel, S., Heinold, B., and Lohmann, U.: The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1643–1677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Thornhill et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Thornhill, G. D., Collins, W. J., Kramer, R. J., Olivié, D., Skeie, R. B., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Checa-Garcia, R., Bauer, S. E., Deushi, M., Emmons, L. K., Forster, P. M., Horowitz, L. W., Johnson, B., Keeble, J., Lamarque, J.-F., Michou, M., Mills, M. J., Mulcahy, J. P., Myhre, G., Nabat, P., Naik, V., Oshima, N., Schulz, M., Smith, C. J., Takemura, T., Tilmes, S., Wu, T., Zeng, G., and Zhang, J.: Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 853–874, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-853-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-853-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Tzivion et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>Tzivion, S., Feingold, G., and Levin, Z.: An efficient numerical solution to the stochastic collection equation, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 3139–3149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044&lt;3139:AENSTT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044&lt;3139:AENSTT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>van der Werf et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth System Science Data, 9, 697–720, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</ext-link>, 2017 (data available at: <uri>https://www.geo.vu.nl/~gwerf/GFED/GFED4/</uri>, last access: 22 January 2025).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>van Noije et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>van Noije, T., Bergman, T., Le Sager, P., O'Donnell, D., Makkonen, R., Gonçalves-Ageitos, M., Döscher, R., Fladrich, U., von Hardenberg, J., Keskinen, J.-P., Korhonen, H., Laakso, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ollinaho, P., Pérez García-Pando, C., Reerink, T., Schrödner, R., Wyser, K., and Yang, S.: EC-Earth3-AerChem: a global climate model with interactive aerosols and atmospheric chemistry participating in CMIP6 , Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5637–5668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>von Salzen(2006)</label><mixed-citation>von Salzen, K.: Piecewise log-normal approximation of size distributions for aerosol modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1351–1372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1351-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1351-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>von Salzen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>von Salzen, K., Scinocca, J. F., McFarlane, N. A., Li, J., Cole, J. N. S., Plummer, D., Verseghy, D., Reader, M. C., Ma, X., Lazare, M., and Solheim, L.: The Canadian Fourth Generation Atmospheric Global Climate Model (CanAM4). Part I: Representation of Physical Processes, Atmosphere-Ocean, 51, 104–125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2012.755610" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/07055900.2012.755610</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>von Salzen et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>von Salzen, K., Whaley, C. H., Anenberg, S. C., Van Dingenen, R., Klimont, Z., Flanner, M. G., Mahmood, R., Arnold, S. R., Beagley, S., Chien, R.-Y., Christensen, J. H., Eckhardt, S., Ekman, A. M. L., Evangeliou, N., Faluvegi, G., Fu, J. S., Gauss, M., Gong, W., Hjorth, J. L., Im, U., Krishnan, S., Kupiainen, K., Kühn, T., Langner, J., Law, K. S., Marelle, L., Olivié, D., Onishi, T., Oshima, N., Paunu, V.-V., Peng, Y., Plummer, D., Pozzoli, L., Rao, S., Raut, J.-C., Sand, M., Schmale, J., Sigmond, M., Thomas, M. A., Tsigaridis, K., Tsyro, S., Turnock, S. T., Wang, M., and Winter, B.: Clean Air Policies Are Key for Successfully Mitigating Arctic Warming, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00555-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-022-00555-x</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Wang et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Easter, R. C., Zhang, R., Ma, P.-L., Singh, B., Zhang, K., Ganguly, D., Rasch, P. J., Burrows, S. M., Ghan, S. J., Lou, S., Qian, Y., Yang, Y., Feng, Y., Flanner, M., Leung, L. R., Liu, X., Shrivastava, M., Sun, J., Tang, Q., Xie, S., and Yoon, J.-H.: Aerosols in the E3SM Version 1: New Developments and Their Impacts on Radiative Forcing, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001851, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001851</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Wang et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Peng, Y., von Salzen, K., Yang, Y., Zhou, W., and Zhao, D.: Evaluation of a quasi-steady-state approximation of the cloud droplet growth equation (QDGE) scheme for aerosol activation in global models using multiple aircraft data over both continental and marine environments, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2949–2971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2949-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-2949-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Wang et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, R., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Ciais, P., Schuster, G. L., Chevallier, F., Samset, B. H., Liu, J., Piao, S., Valari, M., and Tao, S.: Estimation of Global Black Carbon Direct Radiative Forcing and Its Uncertainty Constrained by Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 5948–5971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024326" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024326</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Wang et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, R., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Myhre, G., Samset, B. H., Schulz, M., Schuster, G. L., Valari, M., and Tao, S.: Spatial Representativeness Error in the Ground-Level Observation Networks for Black Carbon Radiation Absorption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2106–2114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076817</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Wang et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Lin, L., Xu, Y., Che, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Dong, W., Wang, C., Gui, K., and Xie, B.: Incorrect Asian Aerosols Affecting the Attribution and Projection of Regional Climate Change in CMIP6 Models, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 4, 2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00159-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-020-00159-2</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Westervelt et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Westervelt, D. M., You, Y., Li, X., Ting, M., Lee, D. E., and Ming, Y.: Relative Importance of Greenhouse Gases, Sulfate, Organic Carbon, and Black Carbon Aerosol for South Asian Monsoon Rainfall Changes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088363" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL088363</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Williams et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Williams, T., Shaddix, C., Jensen, K., and Suo-Anttila, J.: Measurement of the dimensionless extinction coefficient of soot within laminar diffusion flames, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 50, 1616–1630, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.08.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.08.024</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Winker et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z., Hunt, W. H., and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 2310–2323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Wu et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Wu, K., Li, J., von Salzen, K., and Zhang, F.: Explicit solutions to the mixing rules with three-component inclusions, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 207, 78–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.020</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Xie et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Xie, X., Myhre, G., Liu, X., Li, X., Shi, Z., Wang, H., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.-F., Shindell, D., Takemura, T., and Liu, Y.: Distinct responses of Asian summer monsoon to black carbon aerosols and greenhouse gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11823–11839, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11823-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11823-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Xu(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Y.: Electromagnetic scattering by an aggregate of spheres, Appl. Optics, 34, 4573–4588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.004573" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.34.004573</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Yon et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Yon, J., Liu, F., Bescond, A., Caumont-Prim, C., Rozé, C., Ouf, F.-X., and Coppalle, A.: Effects of multiple scattering on radiative properties of soot fractal aggregates, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 133, 374–381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.08.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.08.022</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Yukimoto et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Yukimoto, S., Kawai, H., Koshiro, T., Oshima, N., Yoshida, K., Urakawa, S., Tsujino, H., Deushi, M., Tanaka, T., Hosaka, M., Yabu, S., Yoshimura, H., Shindo, E., Mizuta, R., Obata, A., Adachia, Y., and Ishii, M.: The Meteorological Research Institute Earth System Model Version 2.0, MRI-ESM2.0: Description and Basic Evaluation of the Physical Component, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 97, 931–965, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2151/jmsj.2019-051</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Yurkin and Hoekstra(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Yurkin, M. and Hoekstra, A.: The discrete dipole approximation: An overview and recent developments, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 106, 558–589, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.034</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Zanatta et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Zanatta, M., Mertes, S., Jourdan, O., Dupuy, R., Järvinen, E., Schnaiter, M., Eppers, O., Schneider, J., Jurányi, Z., and Herber, A.: Airborne investigation of black carbon interaction with low-level, persistent, mixed-phase clouds in the Arctic summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7955–7973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7955-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-7955-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Zhang and Rothrock(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. and Rothrock, D.: Modeling Global Sea Ice with a Thickness and Enthalpy Distribution Model in Generalized Curvilinear Coordinates, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 845–861, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131&lt;0845:MGSIWA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131&lt;0845:MGSIWA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Zhang et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, L., Gong, S., Padro, J., and Barrie, L.: A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module, Atmos. Environ., 35, 49–560, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Zhao et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, M., Golaz, J.-C., Held, I. M., Guo, H., Balaji, V., Benson, R., Chen, J.-H., Chen, X., Donner, L. J., Dunne, J. P., Dunne, K., Durachta, J., Fan, S.-M., Freidenreich, S. M., Garner, S. T., Ginoux, P., Harris, L. M., Horowitz, L. W., Krasting, J. P., Langenhorst, A. R., Liang, Z., Lin, P., Lin, S.-J., Malyshev, S. L., Mason, E., Milly, P. C. D., Ming, Y., Naik, V., Paulot, F., Paynter, D., Phillipps, P., Radhakrishnan, A., Ramaswamy, V., Robinson, T., Schwarzkopf, D., Seman, C. J., Shevliakova, E., Shen, Z., Shin, H., Silvers, L. G., Wilson, J. R., Winton, M., Wittenberg, A. T., Wyman, B., and Xiang, B.: The GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model AM4.0/LM4.0: 1. Simulation Characteristics With Prescribed SSTs, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 691–734, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017MS001208</ext-link>, 2018. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx119"><label>Ziehn et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Ziehn, T., Chamberlain, M. A., Law, R. M., Lenton, A., Bodman, R. W., Dix, M., Stevens, L., Wang, Y., and Srbinovsky, J.: The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5, Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science, 70, 193–214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/ES19035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/ES19035</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx120"><label>Zuo et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Zuo, H., Balmaseda, M., and Mogensen, K.: The new eddy-permitting ORAP5 ocean reanalysis: description, evaluation and uncertainties in climate signals, Clim. Dynam., 49, 791–811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2675-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-015-2675-1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The impact of uncertainty in black carbon's refractive index on simulated optical depth and radiative forcing</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adachi et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adachi, K., Chung, S. H., and Buseck, P. R.: Shapes of soot aerosol particles
and implications for their effects on climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D15206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>AMAP(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
AMAP: AMAP Assessment 2021: Impacts of Short-lived Climate Forcers on
Arctic Climate, Air Quality, and Human Health, Tech. rep., Arctic
Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Tromsø, Norway, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Andrews et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andrews, E., Ogren, J. A., Kinne, S., and Samset, B.: Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6041–6072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6041-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bellouin et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bellouin, N., Rae, J., Jones, A., Johnson, C., Haywood, J., and Boucher, O.:
Aerosol Forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)
Simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the Role of Ammonium Nitrate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D20206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bergman et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bergman, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Korhonen, H., Lehtinen, K. J., Makkonen, R., Arola, A., Mielonen, T., Romakkaniemi, S., Kulmala, M., and Kokkola, H.: Evaluation of the sectional aerosol microphysics module SALSA implementation in ECHAM5-HAM aerosol-climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 845–868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-845-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-845-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bescond et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bescond, A., Yon, J., Ouf, F.-X., Rozé, C., Coppalle, A., Parent, P., Ferry,
D., and Laffon, C.: Soot optical properties determined by analyzing
extinction spectra in the visible near-UV: Toward an optical speciation
according to constituents and structure, J. Aerosol Sci., 101,
118–132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.001</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bohren and Huffman(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and scattering of light by small
particles, Wiley, New York, ISBN 9783527618163, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bond and Bergstrom(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous
Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 27–67,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bond et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender,
C. S.: Bounding the Role of Black Carbon in the Climate System: A
Scientific Assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P.,
Satheesh, S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and
Aerosols, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., chapter 7, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
and New York, NY, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis: CanESM: The Canadian Earth System Model, GitLab [code], <a href="https://gitlab.com/cccma/canesm/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 22 January 2025), 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Caswell et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Caswell, T., Lee, A., Sales de Andrade, E., Droettboom, M., Hoffmann, T.,
Klymak, J., Hunter, J., Firing, E., Stansby, D., Varoquaux, N., Nielsen,
J. H., Root,
B., May,
R., Gustafsson,
O., Elson,
P., Seppänen,
J. K., Lee,
J.-J., Dale,
D., McDougall,
H.
D., Straw,
A., Hobson,
P., Sunden,
K., Lucas,
G., Gohlke,
C., Vincent,
A. F., Yu,
T. S., Ma,
E., Silvester,
S., and
Moad, C.: matplotlib/matplotlib: REL: v3.7.1 (v3.7.1), Zenodo [software],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7697899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7697899</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Chang and Charalampopoulos(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, H.-C. and Charalampopoulos, T. T.: Determination of the wavelength
dependence of refractive indices of flame soot, P. Roy.
Soc. Lond. A, 430,
577–591, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1990.0107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1990.0107</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chin et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B., Duncan, B., Martin,
R., Logan, J., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.: Tropospheric Aerosol Optical
Thickness from the GOCART Model and Comparisons with Satellite and Sun
Photometer Measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0461:TAOTFT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Colarco et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Colarco, P., da Silva, A., Chin, M., and Diehl, T.: Online simulations of
global aerosol distributions in the NASA GEOS-4 model and comparisons to
satellite and ground-based aerosol optical depth, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D14207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012820" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012820</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Cole et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cole, J. N. S., von Salzen, K., Li, J., Scinocca, J., Plummer, D., Arora, V., McFarlane, N., Lazare, M., MacKay, M., and Verseghy, D.: The Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5 (CanAM5.0.3), Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5427–5448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Collins et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collins, W. J., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Eyring, V., Hegglin, M. I., Maycock, A., Myhre, G., Prather, M., Shindell, D., and Smith, S. J.: AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 585–607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Croft et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Croft, B., Lohmann, U., and von Salzen, K.: Black carbon ageing in the Canadian Centre for Climate modelling and analysis atmospheric general circulation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1931–1949, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1931-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1931-2005</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>d'Almeida et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
d'Almeida, G., Koepke, P., and Shettle, E.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Global
Climatology and Radiative Characteristics, A. Deepak Publishing, Hampton, VA,
1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Dalzell and Sarofim(1969)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dalzell, W. H. and Sarofim, A. F.: Optical Constants of Soot and Their
Application to Heat-Flux Calculations, J. Heat Transf., 91,
100–104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3580063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3580063</a>, 1969.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Digby(2025a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Digby, R.: digbyr/publication-scripts-bcri: revised submission (version v2.0), Zenodo [software], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14715011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14715011</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Digby(2025b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Digby, R.: BCRI simulation data, CRD Data Store [data set], <a href="https://crd-data-donnees-rdc.ec.gc.ca/CCCMA/publications/2025_Digby_black_carbon_refractive_index/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 22 January 2025), 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Diner et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Diner, D., Beckert, J., Reilly, T., Bruegge, C., Conel, J., Kahn, R.,
Martonchik, J., Ackerman, T., Davies, R., Gerstl, S., Gordon, H., Muller,
J.-P., Myneni, R., Sellers, P., Pinty, B., and Verstraete, M.: Multi-Angle
Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) Instrument Description and
Experiment Overview, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 36, 1072–1087,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.700992" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/36.700992</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Dubovik et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dubovik, O., Herman, M., Holdak, A., Lapyonok, T., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J. L., Ducos, F., Sinyuk, A., and Lopatin, A.: Statistically optimized inversion algorithm for enhanced retrieval of aerosol properties from spectral multi-angle polarimetric satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 975–1018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-975-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-975-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Dunne et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dunne, E. M., Gordon, H., Kürten, A., Almeida, J., Duplissy, J., Williamson,
C., Ortega, I. K., Pringle, K. J., Adamov, A., Baltensperger, U., Barmet, P.,
Benduhn, F., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Clarke, A., Curtius, J.,
Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida,
R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J.,
Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Kupc, A., Lawler, M. J., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov,
V., Mann, G., Mathot, S., Merikanto, J., Miettinen, P., Nenes, A., Onnela,
A., Rap, A., Reddington, C. L. S., Riccobono, F., Richards, N. A. D.,
Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K.,
Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Stozkhov, Y., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J.,
Wagner, P. E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., and Carslaw,
K. S.: Global atmospheric particle formation from CERN CLOUD measurements,
Science, 354, 1119–1124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>ESGF(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
ESGF: The Earth System Grid Federation: An open infrastructure for access to distributed geospatial data, Future Generation Computer Systems, 36, 400–417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.07.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.07.002</a>, 2014 (data available at: <a href="https://aims2.llnl.gov/search/input4mips/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 22 January 2025).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Flanner et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Flanner, M. G., Liu, X., Zhou, C., Penner, J. E., and Jiao, C.: Enhanced solar energy absorption by internally-mixed black carbon in snow grains, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4699–4721, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4699-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4699-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Forster et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Forster, P. M., Richardson, T., Maycock, A. C., Smith, C. J., Samset, B. H.,
Myhre, G., Andrews, T., Pincus, R., and Schulz, M.: Recommendations for
diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 12460–12475,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025320" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025320</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Ganguly et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ganguly, D., Rasch, P. J., Wang, H., and Yoon, J.-H.: Climate Response of the
South Asian Monsoon System to Anthropogenic Aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D13209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017508" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017508</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Ghan(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ghan, S. J.: Technical Note: Estimating aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9971–9974, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9971-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9971-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Gliß et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Schulz, M., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Benedictow, A. M. K., Bian, H., Checa-Garcia, R., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Griesfeller, J. J., Heckel, A., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Laj, P., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Lund Myhre, C., Matsui, H., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., van Noije, T., North, P., Olivié, D. J. L., Rémy, S., Sogacheva, L., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Tsyro, S. G.: AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 87–128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Hajima et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hajima, T., Watanabe, M., Yamamoto, A., Tatebe, H., Noguchi, M. A., Abe, M., Ohgaito, R., Ito, A., Yamazaki, D., Okajima, H., Ito, A., Takata, K., Ogochi, K., Watanabe, S., and Kawamiya, M.: Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2197–2244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Hess et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.: Optical Properties of Aerosols and
Clouds: The Software Package OPAC, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 79, 831–844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Heyn et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heyn, I., Block, K., Mülmenstädt, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kühne, P., Salzmann,
M., and Quaas, J.: Assessment of simulated aerosol effective radiative
forcings in the terrestrial spectrum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44,
1001–1007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071975" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071975</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Hodnebrog et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hodnebrog, Ø., Myhre, G., and Samset, B. H.: How Shorter Black Carbon
Lifetime Alters Its Climate Effect, Nat. Commun., 5, 5065,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6065</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Hoesly et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Hu et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, D., Alfarra, M. R., Szpek, K., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Flynn,
M. J., Shao, Y., Voliotis, A., Du, M., Liu, D., Johnson, B., McFiggans, G.,
Haywood, J. M., Coe, H., and Allan, J.: Refractive Index of Engine-Emitted
Black Carbon and the Influence of Organic Coatings on Optical Properties,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2023JD039178,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039178" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039178</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Hunter(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55</a>, 2007 (code available at: <a href="https://matplotlib.org/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 22 January 2025).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Janzen(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janzen, J.: The refractive index of colloidal carbon, J. Colloid
Interf. Sci., 69, 436–447, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(79)90133-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(79)90133-4</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Kahnert(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kahnert, M.: On the Discrepancy between Modeled and Measured Mass Absorption
Cross Sections of Light Absorbing Carbon Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44, 453–460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003733834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003733834</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Kahnert and Kanngießer(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kahnert, M. and Kanngießer, F.: Modelling optical properties of atmospheric
black carbon aerosols, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 244, 106849, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106849" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106849</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>King et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
King, M. D., Platnick, S., Menzel, W. P., Ackerman, S. A., and Hubanks, P. A.:
Spatial and temporal distribution of clouds observed by MODIS onboard the
Terra and Aqua satellites, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 51,
3826–3852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227333" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227333</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Koch and Del Genio(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koch, D. and Del Genio, A. D.: Black carbon semi-direct effects on cloud cover: review and synthesis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7685–7696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7685-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7685-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Koch et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koch, D., Schulz, M., Kinne, S., McNaughton, C., Spackman, J. R., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T., Bond, T. C., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Clarke, A., De Luca, N., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Dubovik, O., Easter, R., Fahey, D. W., Feichter, J., Fillmore, D., Freitag, S., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Horowitz, L., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Klimont, Z., Kondo, Y., Krol, M., Liu, X., Miller, R., Montanaro, V., Moteki, N., Myhre, G., Penner, J. E., Perlwitz, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Sahu, L., Sakamoto, H., Schuster, G., Schwarz, J. P., Seland, Ø., Stier, P., Takegawa, N., Takemura, T., Textor, C., van Aardenne, J. A., and Zhao, Y.: Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9001–9026, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9001-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9001-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Lee and Tien(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, S. and Tien, C.: Optical constants of soot in hydrocarbon flames,
Symposium (International) on Combustion, eighteenth Symposium
(International) on Combustion, 18, 1159–1166,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(81)80120-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(81)80120-8</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Li et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., von Salzen, K., Peng, Y., Zhang, H., and Liang, X.: Evaluation of black
carbon semi‒direct radiative effect in a climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 4715–4728, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50327</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Li et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Digby, R., and von Salzen, K.: Accounting for black carbon refractive
index in atmospheric radiation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 150, 4806–4819, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4842" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4842</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Li et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Z., Lau, W. K.-M., Ramanathan, V., Wu, G., Ding, Y., Manoj, M. G., Liu, J.,
Qian, Y., Li, J., Zhou, T., Fan, J., Rosenfeld, D., Ming, Y., Wang, Y.,
Huang, J., Wang, B., Xu, X., Lee, S.-S., Cribb, M., Zhang, F., Yang, X.,
Zhao, C., Takemura, T., Wang, K., Xia, X., Yin, Y., Zhang, H., Guo, J., Zhai,
P. M., Sugimoto, N., Babu, S. S., and Brasseur, G. P.: Aerosol and Monsoon
Climate Interactions over Asia, Rev. Geophys., 54, 866–929,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000500" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000500</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Liu et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, F., Yon, J., Fuentes, A., Lobo, P., Smallwood, G. J., and Corbin, J. C.:
Review of Recent Literature on the Light Absorption Properties of Black
Carbon: Refractive Index, Mass Absorption Cross Section, and Absorption
Function, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54, 33–51,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1676878" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1676878</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Liu et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Zaveri, R., Rasch, P., Shi, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Vitt, F., Conley, A., Park, S., Neale, R., Hannay, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Hess, P., Mahowald, N., Collins, W., Iacono, M. J., Bretherton, C. S., Flanner, M. G., and Mitchell, D.: Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 709–739, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Lohmann and Feichter(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Lund et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lund, M., Samset, B., Skeie, R., Watson-Parris, D., Katich, J., Schwarz, J.,
and Weinzierl, B.: Short Black Carbon lifetime inferred from a global set of
aircraft observations, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1, 31,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Ma et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, X., von Salzen, K., and Li, J.: Modelling sea salt aerosol and its direct and indirect effects on climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1311–1327, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1311-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1311-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Mackowski(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mackowski, D. W.: Electrostatics analysis of radiative absorption by sphere
clusters in the Rayleigh limit: application to soot particles, Appl.
Optics, 34, 3535–3545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.003535" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.003535</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Mackowski and Mishchenko(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mackowski, D. W. and Mishchenko, M. I.: Calculation of the T matrix and the
scattering matrix for ensembles of spheres, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 13,
2266–2278, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.13.002266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.13.002266</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Matsui(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matsui, H.: Development of a global aerosol model using a two-dimensional
sectional method: 1. Model design, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 9, 1921–1947, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000936" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000936</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Menna and D'Alessio(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Menna, P. and D'Alessio, A.: Light scattering and extinction coefficients for
soot-forming flames in the wavelength range from 200&thinsp;nm to 600&thinsp;nm, Symposium
(International) on Combustion, 19, 1421–1428,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(82)80319-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(82)80319-6</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Mie(1908)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mie, G.: Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler
Metallösungen, Annalen der Physik, 330, 377–445,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19083300302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19083300302</a>, 1908.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Moteki et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., and Nakamura, S.-I.: Method to measure refractive
indices of small nonspherical particles: Application to black carbon
particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 513–521,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Moteki et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moteki, N., Ohata, S., Yoshida, A., and Adachi, K.: Constraining the complex
refractive index of black carbon particles using the complex
forward-scattering amplitude, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 57, 678–699,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2202243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.2202243</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Myhre et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myhre, G., Berglen, T. F., Johnsrud, M., Hoyle, C. R., Berntsen, T. K., Christopher, S. A., Fahey, D. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Jones, T. A., Kahn, R. A., Loeb, N., Quinn, P., Remer, L., Schwarz, J. P., and Yttri, K. E.: Modelled radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect with multi-observation evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1365–1392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1365-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1365-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Namazi et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Namazi, M., von Salzen, K., and Cole, J. N. S.: Simulation of black carbon in snow and its climate impact in the Canadian Global Climate Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10887–10904, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10887-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10887-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: MISR Level 3 Component Global Aerosol product in netCDF
format covering a month V004, ASDC – Atmospheric Science Data Center [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Terra/MISR/MIL3MAEN_L3.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/Terra/MISR/MIL3MAEN_L3.004</a> 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>O'Rourke et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Rourke, P., Smith, S., Mott, A., Ahsan, H., McDuffie, E., Crippa, M.,
Klimont, Z., MacDonald, B., Wang, S., Nicholson, M., Feng, L., and Hoesly,
R.: CEDS v. 2021.04.21 gridded emissions data (Version v_2021_02_05),
Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741285" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741285</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Pan et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pan, X., Ichoku, C., Chin, M., Bian, H., Darmenov, A., Colarco, P., Ellison, L., Kucsera, T., da Silva, A., Wang, J., Oda, T., and Cui, G.: Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 969–994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-969-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-969-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Peng et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M., Zeng,
L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C., Collins, D., Molina,
M., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct radiative forcing
of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113</a>,
2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Peng and Lohmann(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peng, Y. and Lohmann, U.: Sensitivity study of the spectral dispersion of the
cloud droplet size distribution on the indirect aerosol effect, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017192</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Peng et al.(2012)Peng, von Salzen, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peng, Y., von Salzen, K., and Li, J.: Simulation of mineral dust aerosol with Piecewise Log-normal Approximation (PLA) in CanAM4-PAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6891–6914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6891-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6891-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Persad et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Persad, G. G., Samset, B. H., and Wilcox, L. J.: Aerosols Must Be Included in
Climate Risk Assessments, Nature, 611, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03763-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03763-9</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Platnick et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Platnick, S., King, M., and Hubanks, P.: MODIS Atmosphere L3 Monthly Product,
NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD08_M3.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD08_M3.061</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>POLDER Data Release(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
POLDER Data Release: POLDER Data Release, GraspOpen [data set],
<a href="https://www.grasp-open.com/products/polder-data-release/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 9 March 2023), 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Purcell and Pennypacker(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Purcell, E. M. and Pennypacker, C. R.: Scattering and Absorption of Light
by Nonspherical Dielectric Grains, Astrophys. J., 186, 705–714,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/152538" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/152538</a>, 1973.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Ramachandran and Reist(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ramachandran, G. and Reist, P. C.: Characterization of Morphological Changes in
Agglomerates Subject to Condensation and Evaporation Using Multiple Fractal
Dimensions, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 23, 431–442,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829508965326" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829508965326</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Samset(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Samset, B. H.: Aerosol Absorption Has an Underappreciated Role in Historical
Precipitation Change, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 242,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00576-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00576-6</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Samset et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T. K., Bian, H., Bellouin, N., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Iversen, T., Kinne, S., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Zhang, K.: Black carbon vertical profiles strongly affect its radiative forcing uncertainty, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2423–2434, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2423-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2423-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Samset et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Forster, P. M., Hodnebrog, Ø., Andrews, T.,
Faluvegi, G., Fläschner, D., Kasoar, M., Kharin, V., Kirkevåg, A.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Olivié, D., Richardson, T., Shindell, D., Shine, K. P.,
Takemura, T., and Voulgarakis, A.: Fast and Slow Precipitation Responses to
Individual Climate Forcers: A PDRMIP Multimodel Study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2782–2791, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068064</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Samset et al.(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Samset, B. H., Sand, M., Smith, C. J., Bauer, S. E., Forster, P. M.,
Fuglestvedt, J. S., Osprey, S., and Schleussner, C.-F.: Climate Impacts
From a Removal of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1020–1029, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076079</a>, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Samset et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Samset, B. H., Stjern, C. W., Andrews, E., Kahn, R. A., Myhre, G., Schulz, M.,
and Schuster, G. L.: Aerosol Absorption: Progress Towards Global and
Regional Constraints, Current Climate Change Reports, 4, 65–83,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0091-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0091-4</a>, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Sand et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sand, M., Berntsen, T., von Salzen, K., Flanner, M., Langner, J., and Victor,
D.: Response of Arctic temperature to changes in emissions of short-lived
climate forcers, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 286–289,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2880</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Sand et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sand, M., Samset, B. H., Tsigaridis, K., Bauer, S. E., and Myhre, G.: Black
Carbon and Precipitation: An Energetics Perspective, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032239" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032239</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Sand et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sand, M., Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Gliß, J., Bauer, S. E., Bian, H., Chin, M., Checa-Garcia, R., Ginoux, P., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Matsui, H., van Noije, T., Olivié, D. J. L., Remy, S., Schulz, M., Stier, P., Stjern, C. W., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., Tsyro, S. G., and Watson-Parris, D.: Aerosol absorption in global models from AeroCom phase III, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15929–15947, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15929-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Schutgens et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schutgens, N., Dubovik, O., Hasekamp, O., Torres, O., Jethva, H., Leonard, P. J. T., Litvinov, P., Redemann, J., Shinozuka, Y., de Leeuw, G., Kinne, S., Popp, T., Schulz, M., and Stier, P.: AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6895–6917, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Seland et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seland, Ø., Bentsen, M., Olivié, D., Toniazzo, T., Gjermundsen, A., Graff, L. S., Debernard, J. B., Gupta, A. K., He, Y.-C., Kirkevåg, A., Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J., Aas, K. S., Bethke, I., Fan, Y., Griesfeller, J., Grini, A., Guo, C., Ilicak, M., Karset, I. H. H., Landgren, O., Liakka, J., Moseid, K. O., Nummelin, A., Spensberger, C., Tang, H., Zhang, Z., Heinze, C., Iversen, T., and Schulz, M.: Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6165–6200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Sellar et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sellar, A. A., Jones, C. G., Mulcahy, J. P., Tang, Y., Yool, A., Wiltshire, A.,
O'Connor, F. M., Stringer, M., Hill, R., Palmieri, J., Woodward, S., de Mora,
L., Kuhlbrodt, T., Rumbold, S. T., Kelley, D. I., Ellis, R., Johnson, C. E.,
Walton, J., Abraham, N. L., Andrews, M. B., Andrews, T., Archibald, A. T.,
Berthou, S., Burke, E., Blockley, E., Carslaw, K., Dalvi, M., Edwards, J.,
Folberth, G. A., Gedney, N., Griffiths, P. T., Harper, A. B., Hendry, M. A.,
Hewitt, A. J., Johnson, B., Jones, A., Jones, C. D., Keeble, J., Liddicoat,
S., Morgenstern, O., Parker, R. J., Predoi, V., Robertson, E., Siahaan, A.,
Smith, R. S., Swaminathan, R., Woodhouse, M. T., Zeng, G., and Zerroukat, M.:
UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4513–4558,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Shettle and Fenn(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shettle, E. P. and Fenn, R. W.: Models for the Aerosols of the Lower Atmosphere
and the Effects of Humidity Variations on their Optical Properties, vol. 79,
Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States,
1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Sigmond et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sigmond, M., Anstey, J., Arora, V., Digby, R., Gillett, N., Kharin, V., Merryfield, W., Reader, C., Scinocca, J., Swart, N., Virgin, J., Abraham, C., Cole, J., Lambert, N., Lee, W.-S., Liang, Y., Malinina, E., Rieger, L., von Salzen, K., Seiler, C., Seinen, C., Shao, A., Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Wang, L., and Yang, D.: Improvements in the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM) through systematic model analysis: CanESM5.0 and CanESM5.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6553–6591, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6553-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6553-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Stevens and Dastoor(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stevens, R. and Dastoor, A.: A review of the representation of aerosol mixing
state in atmospheric models, Atmosphere, 10, 168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040168" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040168</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Swart et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Swart, N. C., Cole, J. N. S., Kharin, V. V., Lazare, M., Scinocca, J. F., Gillett, N. P., Anstey, J., Arora, V., Christian, J. R., Hanna, S., Jiao, Y., Lee, W. G., Majaess, F., Saenko, O. A., Seiler, C., Seinen, C., Shao, A., Sigmond, M., Solheim, L., von Salzen, K., Yang, D., and Winter, B.: The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4823–4873, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Szopa et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W.,
Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger,
N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, chapter 6, pp. 817–922,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Takemura et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takemura, T., Nakajima, T., Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., and Kinne, S.:
Single-scattering albedo and radiative forcing of various aerosol species
with a global three-dimensional model, J. Climate, 15, 333–352,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015&lt;0333:SSAARF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015&lt;0333:SSAARF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Taylor et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Taylor, J. W., Wu, H., Szpek, K., Bower, K., Crawford, I., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Davies, N. W., Haywood, J. M., and Coe, H.: Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11201–11221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Taylor et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Taylor, K., Williamson, D., and Zwiers, F.: The sea surface temperature and
sea-ice concentration boundary conditions for AMIP II simulations, PCMDI
Report No. 60, Tech. rep., Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and
Intercomparison, University of California, Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Tegen et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tegen, I., Neubauer, D., Ferrachat, S., Siegenthaler-Le Drian, C., Bey, I., Schutgens, N., Stier, P., Watson-Parris, D., Stanelle, T., Schmidt, H., Rast, S., Kokkola, H., Schultz, M., Schroeder, S., Daskalakis, N., Barthel, S., Heinold, B., and Lohmann, U.: The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1643–1677, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Thornhill et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thornhill, G. D., Collins, W. J., Kramer, R. J., Olivié, D., Skeie, R. B., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Checa-Garcia, R., Bauer, S. E., Deushi, M., Emmons, L. K., Forster, P. M., Horowitz, L. W., Johnson, B., Keeble, J., Lamarque, J.-F., Michou, M., Mills, M. J., Mulcahy, J. P., Myhre, G., Nabat, P., Naik, V., Oshima, N., Schulz, M., Smith, C. J., Takemura, T., Tilmes, S., Wu, T., Zeng, G., and Zhang, J.: Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 853–874, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-853-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-853-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Tzivion et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tzivion, S., Feingold, G., and Levin, Z.: An efficient numerical solution to
the stochastic collection equation, J. Atmos. Sci., 44,
3139–3149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044&lt;3139:AENSTT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044&lt;3139:AENSTT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>van der Werf et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen,
Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz,
G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions
estimates during 1997–2016, Earth System Science Data, 9, 697–720,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</a>, 2017 (data available at: <a href="https://www.geo.vu.nl/~gwerf/GFED/GFED4/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 22 January 2025).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>van Noije et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Noije, T., Bergman, T., Le Sager, P., O'Donnell, D., Makkonen, R., Gonçalves-Ageitos, M., Döscher, R., Fladrich, U., von Hardenberg, J., Keskinen, J.-P., Korhonen, H., Laakso, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ollinaho, P., Pérez García-Pando, C., Reerink, T., Schrödner, R., Wyser, K., and Yang, S.: EC-Earth3-AerChem: a global climate model with interactive aerosols and atmospheric chemistry participating in CMIP6 , Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5637–5668, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>von Salzen(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
von Salzen, K.: Piecewise log-normal approximation of size distributions for aerosol modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1351–1372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1351-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1351-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>von Salzen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
von Salzen, K., Scinocca, J. F., McFarlane, N. A., Li, J., Cole, J. N. S.,
Plummer, D., Verseghy, D., Reader, M. C., Ma, X., Lazare, M., and Solheim,
L.: The Canadian Fourth Generation Atmospheric Global Climate Model
(CanAM4). Part I: Representation of Physical Processes,
Atmosphere-Ocean, 51, 104–125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2012.755610" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2012.755610</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>von Salzen et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
von Salzen, K., Whaley, C. H., Anenberg, S. C., Van Dingenen, R., Klimont,
Z., Flanner, M. G., Mahmood, R., Arnold, S. R., Beagley, S., Chien, R.-Y.,
Christensen, J. H., Eckhardt, S., Ekman, A. M. L., Evangeliou, N., Faluvegi,
G., Fu, J. S., Gauss, M., Gong, W., Hjorth, J. L., Im, U., Krishnan, S.,
Kupiainen, K., Kühn, T., Langner, J., Law, K. S., Marelle, L.,
Olivié, D., Onishi, T., Oshima, N., Paunu, V.-V., Peng, Y., Plummer, D.,
Pozzoli, L., Rao, S., Raut, J.-C., Sand, M., Schmale, J., Sigmond, M.,
Thomas, M. A., Tsigaridis, K., Tsyro, S., Turnock, S. T., Wang, M., and
Winter, B.: Clean Air Policies Are Key for Successfully Mitigating Arctic
Warming, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 222,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00555-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00555-x</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Wang et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, H., Easter, R. C., Zhang, R., Ma, P.-L., Singh, B., Zhang, K., Ganguly,
D., Rasch, P. J., Burrows, S. M., Ghan, S. J., Lou, S., Qian, Y., Yang, Y.,
Feng, Y., Flanner, M., Leung, L. R., Liu, X., Shrivastava, M., Sun, J., Tang,
Q., Xie, S., and Yoon, J.-H.: Aerosols in the E3SM Version 1: New
Developments and Their Impacts on Radiative Forcing, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001851, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001851</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Wang et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, H., Peng, Y., von Salzen, K., Yang, Y., Zhou, W., and Zhao, D.: Evaluation of a quasi-steady-state approximation of the cloud droplet growth equation (QDGE) scheme for aerosol activation in global models using multiple aircraft data over both continental and marine environments, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2949–2971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2949-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2949-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Wang et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, R., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Ciais, P., Schuster, G. L., Chevallier,
F., Samset, B. H., Liu, J., Piao, S., Valari, M., and Tao, S.: Estimation of
Global Black Carbon Direct Radiative Forcing and Its Uncertainty Constrained
by Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 5948–5971,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024326" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024326</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Wang et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, R., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Boucher, O., Myhre, G., Samset, B. H.,
Schulz, M., Schuster, G. L., Valari, M., and Tao, S.: Spatial
Representativeness Error in the Ground-Level Observation Networks for Black
Carbon Radiation Absorption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2106–2114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076817</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Wang et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Z., Lin, L., Xu, Y., Che, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Dong, W., Wang, C.,
Gui, K., and Xie, B.: Incorrect Asian Aerosols Affecting the Attribution
and Projection of Regional Climate Change in CMIP6 Models, npj Climate
and Atmospheric Science, 4, 2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00159-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00159-2</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Westervelt et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Westervelt, D. M., You, Y., Li, X., Ting, M., Lee, D. E., and Ming, Y.:
Relative Importance of Greenhouse Gases, Sulfate, Organic
Carbon, and Black Carbon Aerosol for South Asian Monsoon Rainfall
Changes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088363" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088363</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Williams et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Williams, T., Shaddix, C., Jensen, K., and Suo-Anttila, J.: Measurement of the
dimensionless extinction coefficient of soot within laminar diffusion flames,
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 50, 1616–1630,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.08.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.08.024</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Winker et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z., Hunt,
W. H., and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP
Data Processing Algorithms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
26, 2310–2323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Wu et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, K., Li, J., von Salzen, K., and Zhang, F.: Explicit solutions to the mixing
rules with three-component inclusions, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 207, 78–82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.020</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Xie et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xie, X., Myhre, G., Liu, X., Li, X., Shi, Z., Wang, H., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.-F., Shindell, D., Takemura, T., and Liu, Y.: Distinct responses of Asian summer monsoon to black carbon aerosols and greenhouse gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11823–11839, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11823-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11823-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Xu(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, Y.: Electromagnetic scattering by an aggregate of spheres, Appl. Optics,
34, 4573–4588, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.004573" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.004573</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Yon et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yon, J., Liu, F., Bescond, A., Caumont-Prim, C., Rozé, C., Ouf, F.-X., and
Coppalle, A.: Effects of multiple scattering on radiative properties of soot
fractal aggregates, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 133, 374–381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.08.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.08.022</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Yukimoto et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yukimoto, S., Kawai, H., Koshiro, T., Oshima, N., Yoshida, K., Urakawa, S.,
Tsujino, H., Deushi, M., Tanaka, T., Hosaka, M., Yabu, S., Yoshimura, H.,
Shindo, E., Mizuta, R., Obata, A., Adachia, Y., and Ishii, M.: The
Meteorological Research Institute Earth System Model Version 2.0,
MRI-ESM2.0: Description and Basic Evaluation of the Physical Component,
J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 97, 931–965,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Yurkin and Hoekstra(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yurkin, M. and Hoekstra, A.: The discrete dipole approximation: An overview and
recent developments, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 106, 558–589, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.01.034</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Zanatta et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zanatta, M., Mertes, S., Jourdan, O., Dupuy, R., Järvinen, E., Schnaiter, M., Eppers, O., Schneider, J., Jurányi, Z., and Herber, A.: Airborne investigation of black carbon interaction with low-level, persistent, mixed-phase clouds in the Arctic summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7955–7973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7955-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7955-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Zhang and Rothrock(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, J. and Rothrock, D.: Modeling Global Sea Ice with a Thickness and
Enthalpy Distribution Model in Generalized Curvilinear Coordinates, Mon.
Weather Rev., 131, 845–861, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131&lt;0845:MGSIWA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131&lt;0845:MGSIWA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Zhang et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, L., Gong, S., Padro, J., and Barrie, L.: A size-segregated particle dry
deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module, Atmos. Environ.,
35, 49–560, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Zhao et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, M., Golaz, J.-C., Held, I. M., Guo, H., Balaji, V., Benson, R., Chen,
J.-H., Chen, X., Donner, L. J., Dunne, J. P., Dunne, K., Durachta, J., Fan,
S.-M., Freidenreich, S. M., Garner, S. T., Ginoux, P., Harris, L. M.,
Horowitz, L. W., Krasting, J. P., Langenhorst, A. R., Liang, Z., Lin, P.,
Lin, S.-J., Malyshev, S. L., Mason, E., Milly, P. C. D., Ming, Y., Naik, V.,
Paulot, F., Paynter, D., Phillipps, P., Radhakrishnan, A., Ramaswamy, V.,
Robinson, T., Schwarzkopf, D., Seman, C. J., Shevliakova, E., Shen, Z., Shin,
H., Silvers, L. G., Wilson, J. R., Winton, M., Wittenberg, A. T., Wyman, B.,
and Xiang, B.: The GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model AM4.0/LM4.0: 1.
Simulation Characteristics With Prescribed SSTs, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 10, 691–734, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001208</a>, 2018.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>Ziehn et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ziehn, T., Chamberlain, M. A., Law, R. M., Lenton, A., Bodman, R. W., Dix, M.,
Stevens, L., Wang, Y., and Srbinovsky, J.: The Australian Earth System
Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5, Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science,
70, 193–214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/ES19035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/ES19035</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>Zuo et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zuo, H., Balmaseda, M., and Mogensen, K.: The new eddy-permitting ORAP5 ocean
reanalysis: description, evaluation and uncertainties in climate signals,
Clim. Dynam., 49, 791–811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2675-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2675-1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
