<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-25-18227-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Marine aerosol distributions from shipborne observations over the South China Sea: diurnal variation characteristics and their controlling factors</article-title><alt-title>Marine aerosol distributions from shipborne observations</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Qiao</surname><given-names>Zhi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4408-6793</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>Shengcheng</given-names></name>
          <email>csc@aiofm.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Huiqiang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Xiaoqing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Xiaodan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Zihan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhai</surname><given-names>Mengying</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>Yue</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Tao</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9959-2453</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Xuebin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, HFIPS,  Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Science Island Branch of Graduate School,  University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Nanhu Laser Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Advanced Laser Technology Laboratory of Anhui Province, Hefei 230037, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>School of Electronic Engineering, Chaohu University, Chaohu, 238024, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Shengcheng Cui (csc@aiofm.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <issue>23</issue>
      <fpage>18227</fpage><lpage>18247</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>March</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>May</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Zhi Qiao et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e195">Marine aerosols critically influence Earth's radiation budget and climate dynamics through their spatial distributions and composition due to their production and transport processes. However, in situ observational datasets remain limited, particularly in the South China Sea (SCS). Based on our comprehensive shipborne measurements, this study presents a quantitative analysis of marine aerosol distributions and compositional variations between the offshore and pelagic regions over the SCS. Our data demonstrate a 120 % increase in offshore aerosol number concentrations (NCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) relative to pelagic baselines, featuring 120 % higher accumulation-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and 70 % higher coarse-mode particles (1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), quantitatively confirming continental transport affects spatial distribution of marine aerosols. In contrast, in the pelagic regions, marine aerosols are virtually unaffected by continental source and distinctly represent characteristics of the local production. Meteorological analyses identified wind speed (WS) and sea surface temperature (SST) as primary regulators of NC. However, observed NC variations at fixed WS and SST values suggest additional controlling factors. We demonstrate that sea-air temperature differentials (SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) exhibit a stronger correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01) with NC than the other meteorological parameters, where increased SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> led to decreased marine aerosol production. This temperature gradient effect drives pronounced diurnal NC variations, with maximum differences of 35 % observed between daytime, nighttime, and transition periods. These findings provide concrete evidence for the spatial and diurnal variability in marine aerosol distributions over the SCS, thereby further improving understanding of marine aerosol transport and production.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Chaohu University</funding-source>
<award-id>KYQD-202208</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e360">Atmospheric aerosols represent one of the largest uncertainties in the climate system projections for past and future (Andreae and Rosenfeld, 2008; Bauer et al., 2020; Bzdek et al., 2020). The ocean covers more than two-thirds of Earth's surface; marine aerosols are generated from the ocean surface and gas-to-particle conversion in the atmosphere (Korhonen et al., 2008). Globally, they are estimated to account for the largest proportion of natural aerosol emissions (Nascimento et al., 2021; Nguyen et al., 2017; Textor et al., 2006). Therefore, they represent an essential component of atmospheric aerosols. Marine aerosols are divided into two types: anthropogenic aerosols and natural aerosols. The natural category primarily includes sea salt particles and sea spray aerosols (Dedrick et al., 2022; Duce et al., 1965; Sander et al., 2003; Troitskaya et al., 2018). These aerosols modulate the radiative properties by influencing the indirect and direct radiation budget (Decesari et al., 2011; Myhre et al., 2004; Solomon et al., 2011; Woods et al., 2010). Additionally, they affect the nature of the marine cloud microphysics and precipitation patterns (Feingold et al., 1999; Levin et al., 2005; Woodcock, 1952, 1953) and drive the geochemical cycles at the ocean surface (Alexander et al., 2005; Eriksson, 1960; Lawler et al., 2011; Long et al., 2014). As the essential aerosol type in the atmosphere, marine aerosols play a non-negligible role in the radiation budget. Thus, the role of marine aerosols in the climate system cannot be ignored (Li et al., 2022; Andreae and Crutzen, 1997).</p>
      <p id="d2e363">Due to their non-negligible influence on both radiation budget and climate change, there has been an increasing research focus on marine aerosols over the last forty years. Early observations by Prospero (1979) across multiple marine areas showed notable variations in marine aerosol concentrations, ranging from 3.34 to 8.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>. Subsequent data verify substantial regional marine aerosol concentration differences between different ocean regions. In polar regions, submicrometer aerosol (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 nm) mass concentrations averaged 0.76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> in the Arctic (Leck and Persson, 1996) versus 3.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> in the Antarctic (Savoie et al., 1993). In the Pacific Ocean, the PM<sub>2.5</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2500 nm) concentration averaged 12.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> in the Western Pacific (Ma et al., 2022) versus 140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> in the Bohai Sea (Han et al., 2019). In the Indian Ocean, Pant et al. (2009) observed that the average accumulation- to coarse-mode aerosols (500 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 000 nm) mass concentrations were 8.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>. In addition to aerosol mass concentrations, researchers have also observed aerosol number concentrations (NCs) differences. For instance, in marine regions off the coast of China, Kim et al. (2009) found that the average submicrometer aerosol particle (10 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 nm) concentrations were 4335 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2736 cm<sup>−3</sup> over the East China Sea and 5972 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2736 cm<sup>−3</sup> over the Yellow Sea. In summary, there are differences in marine aerosol mass concentrations and NCs between the different ocean regions. However, most available marine aerosol measurements for the SCS come from coastal monitoring stations, while shipboard observations remain sparse and outdated (Kong et al., 2016; Su et al., 2022). Given that shipboard measurements can provide better spatial and temporal context for marine aerosol measurements across diverse ocean areas such as the SCS, expanding and updating such shipboard observations has the potential to improve the characterization of marine aerosol in these regions.</p>
      <p id="d2e637">Aerosol transport and production can lead to differences in marine aerosol concentration and size distribution. Some studies revealed that marine aerosol composition (e.g. sea salt, dust, sulfate, organic carbon) and particle size distribution are influenced by both mesoscale weather events (e.g. thunderstorm, sea breeze, typhoon) and continental transport (Athanasopoulou et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2018; Croft et al., 2021; O'Dowd and de Leeuw, 2007; Sakerin et al., 2015; Sellegri et al., 2006). The SCS, one of the largest marginal seas, is located on the continental margin and separated from the open ocean by islands or island arcs. It is significantly influenced by continental and anthropogenic aerosols transported through continental air masses. Previous studies reveal that continental and anthropogenic aerosols play an important role in determining aerosol concentration and size distribution (Braun et al., 2020; Wu and Boor, 2021). Liang et al. (2021) observed an increase in submicron aerosol NCs and a different number size distribution shape (20 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 nm) when observational data were influenced by continental transport in the SCS. Atwood et al. (2017) further found that under continental transport, the number size distribution exhibits a unimodal structure (20 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 nm). In contrast, a distinct bimodal size distribution (20 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 nm) emerges without continental transport. Given the limited observational data and previous focus on the submicron size range, it is crucial to conduct studies on the impact of aerosol transport on larger aerosol particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 nm) for a more thorough understanding of how transport influences size distributions.</p>
      <p id="d2e734">Furthermore, some key meteorological parameters of the air-sea interface could affect aerosol production and transport, such as wind direction (WD) and speed (WS), relative humidity (RH), and sea surface temperature (SST) (Dasarathy et al., 2023; Carslaw et al., 2010; Hoppel, 1979; Hoppel et al., 1985). Previous studies found that WS is the major driver of production and transport of marine aerosols. Some subsequent studies attempted to link NCs to observed WS (Andreas, 1998, 2010; Gong, 2003; Ovadnevaite et al., 2014; Smith et al., 1993; Yang et al., 2019). These studies derived source functions based on the relationship between aerosol particle size distribution and WS, thereby enabling the simulation of number size distribution and total aerosol NCs. Some studies revealed that rising RH increases particle dry deposition rates (Arimoto and Duce, 1986; Lo et al., 1999), which are important to aerosol transport, as higher dry deposition rates reduce the residence time of aerosols in the atmosphere and shorten their transport distance therein. Ding et al. (2021) found that elevated RH enhances secondary aerosol (e.g. nitrate and sulfate) formation, which directly affects aerosol production. Therefore, RH also affects aerosol transport and production. In addition, SST dramatically influences the production of marine aerosols by affecting bubble bursting time and jet drop production efficiency (Zábori et al., 2012a). Jaeglé et al. (2011) and Mårtensson et al. (2003) further revealed that warmer SST might reduce seawater density and surface tension, ultimately leading to higher marine aerosol production. The reduced surface tension increases wave breaking efficiency, entraining more air into seawater to form bubbles. In addition, the reduced seawater density leads to more bubbles rising back to the sea surface. As these bubbles reach the surface and burst, they subsequently form marine aerosols. However, previous studies indicated that sea-air temperature differentials (SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) influence the air-sea interaction through air-sea heat exchanges and turbulent mixing (O'Neill et al., 2010); meanwhile, it can comprehensively reflect the characteristics of the ocean and atmosphere near the sea surface (Jing et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2016). Hence, SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might affect marine aerosol production and transport, but the exact effects of SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on marine aerosols need further investigation. To better quantify and understand the effect of these meteorological parameters on marine aerosols, more thorough information about the variations of marine aerosol and these factors, especially regarding SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is needed in the SCS. In addition, the diurnal scale of marine aerosol variation can provide valuable information about their production and transport (Flores et al., 2021), and how these processes are influenced by meteorological parameters. Understanding the diurnal variation is also crucial for improving atmospheric models. Studies on the scale of diurnal variation in marine aerosol remain scarce, and there is an urgent need to clarify the specific connection between these diurnal variations and meteorological parameters to better understand aerosol production and transport.</p>
      <p id="d2e798">To address these, we acquired and updated observations of marine aerosol and meteorological parameters over the SCS, then quantitatively compared marine aerosol composition and distributions in the offshore and pelagic regions, as well as influence of aerosol transport on marine aerosol. Subsequently, temporal variations of shipborne observational data were investigated in detail; meanwhile, the differences in distribution of marine aerosol in diurnal variations, especially the diurnal transition, were further analyzed. Based on these analyses, specific relationships between different meteorological parameters and marine aerosols were examined. Finally, overall results of marine aerosol particle size distributions and NCs in the SCS, as well as the possible influence factors were summarized.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Cruise observation and data analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Cruise details</title>
      <p id="d2e816">In May and June 2023, a scientific cruise was conducted in the SCS by the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, onboard the <italic>Yuezhanyuke</italic> <italic>No. 6</italic>. This study analyzes the aerosol-meteorology (AM) measurements along the section from the latitude 21°02<sup>′</sup> N to 8°5<sup>′</sup> N and the longitude 110°33<sup>′</sup> E to 115°25<sup>′</sup> E. All AM data were collected from 21 May to 15 June 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Instrument setup</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Aerosol sampling instrument</title>
      <p id="d2e877">The NCs of aerosol particles were measured with the Model 3321 Aerodynamic Particle Size (APS) spectrometer (TSI Incorporated, USA), which has 52 size channels in the 0.5 to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m diameter range. This Model 3321 APS spectrometer employs relative light-scattering intensity along with sophisticated time-of-flight techniques; two complementary techniques can measure the information of each aerosol particle to obtain aerosol concentrations and distributions. We used the Particle Loss Calculator (PLC) to calculate particle losses for the APS in this cruise (Fig. S1 in the Supplement) (von der Weiden et al., 2009). Figure S1 revealed a dramatic increase in aerosol particle loss at particle diameters exceeding 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Meanwhile, the accuracy of aerosol data for particle diameters between 0.5 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, as measured by the APS, had been fully validated in previous studies (Pagels et al., 2005; Peters and Leith, 2003; Peters, 2006). Therefore, aerosol data within size range of 0.5 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m were selected for analysis in this study.</p>
      <p id="d2e912">To further verify the accuracy of APS aerosol measurement results, we conducted a 15 d field inter-comparison experiment, using multiple aerosol instruments to validate the APS. A detailed description of this field inter-comparison experiment was provided in Sect. S1 in the Supplement. By comparing aerosol size distributions measured by the three instruments (Fig. S2a), the good consistency confirms the accuracy of the APS in capturing aerosol particle distributions. Since direct channel-to-channel matching was not feasible due to the differing size bins for different aerosol measurement instruments, we compared summed NCs within overlapping ranges: 0.5–1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m for APS, 0.475–1.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m for Portable Optical Particle Spectrometer (POPS) (Handix Scientific, USA), and 0.488–2.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m for Model 11-D Portable Aerosol Spectrometer (GRIMM, Germany). All three instruments exhibited consistent diurnal trends (Fig. S2b). Figure S3 showed high correlations between APS and the other instruments. The consistent trends and strong correlations further validate accuracy of the APS. Furthermore, during instrument channel matching, we observed that the APS lacks the standard 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m size bin typically used to distinguish accumulation mode and coarse mode particles. The closest available diameter in APS channels is 1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. A distinct peak consistently appeared at this size in aerosol size distributions. Based on these observations, we established 1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m as the threshold for separating accumulation mode (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) from coarse mode (1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d2e1047">The APS was loaded in the captain's cabin and coupled with a 10 cm long tube and a 1.8 cm internal diameter, as shown in Fig. 1a. The tube was fixed in an exterior wall of the captain's cabin at 30° to the horizontal and faced the direction of the sea surface. Meanwhile, the tube's inlet was approximately 7 m above the mean water level, and this location was thought to be less affected by human factors and bow splashing. The flow rate was 1.0 L min<sup>−1</sup> , and sample length was 15 s. The atmospheric aerosol data resolution was set to 5 min in this SCS cruise observation. The detailed definition and calculation formula for aerosol number concentration were shown below.

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number concentration per channel, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle counts per channel, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total sample time, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sample flow rate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sample dilution factor, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sample efficiency factor per channel.</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1137">The total view of <bold>(a)</bold> the Model 3321 APS spectrometer and <bold>(b)</bold> the automatic meteorological observation system.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f01.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Meteorological instruments</title>
      <p id="d2e1160">The automatic meteorological observation system (AMOS), including the Vaisala WXT530 weather station, the Campbell CSTA3B sonic anemometer, and the Belfort Model 6400 visibility sensor, was installed on the top deck to continuously collect meteorological observational data. The height of the AMOS above the mean water level was approximately 10 m, as shown in Fig. 1b. The Vaisala WXT530 measured atmospheric parameters such as air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OBS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), RH and rainfall intensity with a temporal resolution of 1 s. The two-dimensional wind field (i.e. horizontal components <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was measured by the Campbell CSAT3B, with its temporal resolution being 0.05 s. To support ancillary research, the Belfort Model 6400 observed atmospheric visibility (VIS) with a temporal resolution of 1 s. More detailed specifications of the AMOS were provided in Table 1.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1199">Configurations and specifications of AMOS.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="3.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="3.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="3.3cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center" colsep="1">WXT530 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">CSTA3B </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">Model 6400 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Performance index</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Performance index</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left">Performance index</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Observation Range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OBS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 60 °C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Observation Range (WS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–60 m s<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left">Observation Range (VIS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–50 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OBS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1 °C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Resolution (WS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1 m s<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left">Resolution (VIS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Accuracy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OBS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Accuracy (WS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left">Accuracy (VIS)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Observation Range (RH)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–100 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Observation Range (WD)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–360°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Resolution (RH)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Resolution (WD)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Accuracy (RH)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Accuracy (WD)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Observation Range (Rain)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–200 mm h<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Resolution (Rain)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1 mm h<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Accuracy (Rain)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm h<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5" align="left"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Auxiliary data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Reanalysis data</title>
      <p id="d2e1619">In this study, 10 m wind speed (WS<sub>10</sub>), direction (WD<sub>10</sub>), and friction velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">zust</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were obtained from the ERA5 hourly dataset with a spatial resolution of 0.25° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25°. The ERA5 hourly dataset used in this study was provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) (Hersbach et al., 2020); ERA5 was selected for these dynamical properties due to better in situ agreement (Li et al., 2025). To determine values of SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we needed to know temperature at 2 m (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and SST. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) provides reanalyzed SST and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data that show excellent agreement with observational data in the SCS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Jiang et al., 2021). We selected SST and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from the MERRA-2 meteorological dataset in this context (Gelaro et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d2e1731">For atmospheric aerosol composition, the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center MERRA-2 aerosol dataset was used in this study due to its good performance over Europe and China (Provençal et al., 2017a, b). The MERRA-2 aerosol dataset includes the assimilated aerosol diagnostics data, such as surface mass concentrations of aerosol composition (e.g. sea salt (SEAS<sub>10</sub>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), dust (DUST<sub>10</sub>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), black carbon (BC), sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and organic carbon (OC)) with a spatial resolution of 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.625° and a temporal resolution of 1 h (Randles et al., 2017). We used above aerosol composition data to discuss differences in aerosol distribution over the SCS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Back trajectory analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1837">The Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) transport and dispersion model (<uri>https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</uri>, last access: 18 October 2025), developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory (NOAA ARL), was employed to analyze air mass backward trajectories. The meteorological data for the backward trajectories were obtained from the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) archive dataset (<uri>https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/weather-climate-models/global-data-assimilation</uri>, last access: 18 October 2025). The backward trajectories were calculated for 72 h. The trajectories were calculated at an altitude of 10 m above ground level to match the instrument sampling height, and the top of the HYSPLIT model was set to 5000 m to clarify the influence of the source region on the marine aerosols.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Distances from the coast</title>
      <p id="d2e1854">The ArcGIS path distance method was used to calculate distances from the coast. In equidistant projection, ship positions were used as input data, and coastline position data were used as reference lines for distance analyses. Considering the actual surface distance as well as horizontal and vertical factors, the shortest distance from the ship to the coastline can be calculated.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Contaminated data screening</title>
      <p id="d2e1866">To observe actual aerosol loadings in the typical marine environment, it is necessary to exclude aerosol observational data contaminated by ship emissions during the cruise (including data collected in offshore and pelagic regions). To achieve this, we performed quality control during aerosol observational data collection with accompanied WS, WD, rainfall intensity, and NC observational data as follows: <list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label>
      <p id="d2e1871"><italic>Data screening with wind observations</italic>. The north arrow of the Vaisala WXT530 was oriented perpendicular to the ship's longitudinal axis, pointing east relative to the vessel's heading. Observed WD thus represented the relative angle between the wind direction and the ship's course. When the ship was sailing, WD sampled ranged from 225 to 315°. We excluded these data because aerosol observations were directly affected by the ship emissions. As depicted in Fig. 2a, a sharp decrease and subsequent increase in the observed aerosol size distributions can be easily identified on 25 May. The underlying cause of abnormal changes in aerosol size distribution could be the removal of coarse aerosol mode by rainfall, as depicted in Fig. 2b. However, this “jump” was located at 07:00 LT (local time; circled in black in Fig. 2a) while the rainfall occurred at 08:00 LT and lasted for approximately 6 h, so it is not the rainfall that influences the data jump in aerosol size distribution. With the help of WD sequence data shown in Fig. 2b (circled in red), we found that the jump in WD curve was also located at 07:20 LT and thus identified the accurate cause of aerosol data jump; it was wind direction rather than rainfall that led to the anomaly in aerosol size distributions.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label>
      <p id="d2e1877"><italic>Further data screening with unreasonable NCs</italic>. Aerosol NCs remain relatively constant under stable meteorological conditions (Hoppel, 1979; Hoppel et al., 1985; Russell et al., 1996). In the presence of continental transport, sustained high NCs would persist for several hours (Saha et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2020). Therefore, to further screen out the possible influence of ship emissions, we excluded data points where NCs exhibited a sharp short-term fluctuation (i.e. one order of magnitude higher or lower than the average NCs at that time) in the absence of changes in meteorological parameters and influences of continental transport.</p></list-item></list> Applying these criteria, 88 % of the observational data in this cruise were retained for analysis.</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1885">The time series of the observations on 25 May 2023. The black circle represented one case of ship pollution. <bold>(a)</bold> Trends of the aerosol size distributions. <bold>(b)</bold> Trends of the rainfall intensity and the WD.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>


</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Temporal distributions of the observations</title>
      <p id="d2e1918">Figure 3 showed the time series of marine aerosol distributions and meteorological parameters during the observation shipboard in the SCS. Due to the pump of the Model 3321 APS spectrometer failing to work from 4 June to 15 June 2023 during the cruise period, flow rate could not reach the minimum standard. Thus, we only analyzed variations of observational data from 21 May to 3 June 2023. Figure 3a–b presented the trends of aerosol size distribution and comparison of the accumulation (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and coarse (1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) mode particle NCs. During the shipboard observation period, the summed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) NC varied from 18.46 to 89.38 cm<sup>−3</sup>, NC of accumulation mode varied from 17.39 to 87.31 cm<sup>−3</sup>, and NC of coarse mode varied from 0.83 to 2.49 cm<sup>−3</sup>. The NCs exhibited substantial temporal fluctuations. The average values for summed NC, accumulation mode NC, and coarse mode NC were 54.01, 52.35, and 1.66 cm<sup>−3</sup>, respectively. Published observational data of marine aerosol NC relevant to this study were shown in Table 2. The shipboard observational data showed overall average values and standard deviations of maritime aerosol NCs under different temporal and geographical conditions. We used these data to compare with the marine aerosol NCs during this cruise period.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2081">The time series of the shipboard observations in the SCS from 21 May to 3 June 2023. The blue-shaded regions represented periods affected by rain events. <bold>(a)</bold> Trend of the aerosol size distributions. <bold>(b)</bold> Trends of NCs of the two aerosol particle modes (black solid line represented the NC of the coarse mode, and red solid line represented the NC of the accumulation mode). <bold>(c)</bold> Trend of the WD. <bold>(d)</bold> Trends of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OBS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dark orange solid line), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (light orange solid line), and SST (blue solid line). <bold>(e)</bold> Trends in the RH (gray solid line), the VIS (red solid line), and the rainfall intensity (dark blue solid line).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T2" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2135">Summary of the available study results on the shipboard observation of marine aerosol NC (cm<sup>−3</sup>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="3cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time (yyyy.mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Season</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Latitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Longitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South China Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2023.05–2023.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21–8° N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">115–110° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left">Accumulation mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1981</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">52.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">54.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">This Study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South China Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2018.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Summer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23–19° N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">118–108° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Cai et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South China Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2012.09–2012.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Autumn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21–20° N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">118–113° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">175</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Kong et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South China Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2005.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20–18° N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">118–113° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left">Accumulation mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">50.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Lin et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">East China Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2005.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30–26° N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">122–117° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left">Accumulation mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">109.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 51.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Lin et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">East China Sea</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2017.04–2017.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28–20° N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">130–120° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">57.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2500</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">57.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Ma et al. (2022)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Western Pacific</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2017.04–2017.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20–0° N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">180–130° E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Flores et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e2150">Note. In the column of the “Parameter”, “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” indicated the NC and the subscripts indicated the particle size (nm); in the column of the “Latitude”, “N” represented north latitude. The results of this study and these references were the overall average aerosol NCs.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2653">In this study, observed NC of accumulation mode was lower than the observation in the East China Sea (Lin et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2022). Aerosol emissions from the Yangtze River Delta region are higher than those from the Pearl River Delta region (Li et al., 2017). Due to the influence of aerosol transport, a greater amount of continental and anthropogenic aerosols from the Yangtze River Delta were delivered to the East China Sea compared to the amount transported from the Pearl River Delta to the South China Sea. Hence, the accumulation mode NC was significantly lower in the SCS. The SCS is one of the marginal seas of the Western Pacific. The average summed NC observed in this study (54 cm<sup>−3</sup>, 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) was slightly lower than the NC reported for the Western Pacific (83 cm<sup>−3</sup>, 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) by Flores et al. (2020). Notably, this study focused on particles from 0.5 to 1.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, while Flores et al. (2020) included smaller particles (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m). Differences in the measured particle size ranges are a potential leading cause of the differences in marine aerosol NCs. Regarding marine aerosol NCs in the same ocean regions, the observations of Cai et al. (2020) and Kong et al. (2016) were significantly higher than those in this study. Although the differences in observation seasons and particle size ranges might influence the average NC observations, these differences may still indicate that the marine aerosol was affected by the continental transport and the anthropogenic activity in the offshore regions, based on the latitude and longitude.</p>
      <p id="d2e2815">Wet deposition through scavenging by rainfall is a critical sink for aerosols (Atlas and Giam, 1988; Radke et al., 1980). However, intense precipitation events might paradoxically elevate aerosol NCs. Some studies indicate that impaction of liquid droplets on porous surfaces (e.g. the ship surfaces) may generate aerosol particles (Bird et al., 2010; Joung and Buie, 2015; Zhou et al., 2020). By accounting for observation environment and rainfall intensity, short-duration heavy rainfall resulted in numerous raindrops impacting the ocean and ship surfaces, generating aerosol particles. Subsequently, the monitoring instrument captured some of these aerosol particles, ultimately contributing to the increased aerosol particle concentration observed in Fig. 3 (the blue-shaded regions). In addition to the elevated concentrations of marine aerosols resulting from these rain events, the aerosol NC spectrum distributions shown in Fig. 3a demonstrate continuous marine aerosol NC distributions in the size ranges of 523 to 583, 1715 to 1981, and 3786 to 4371 nm during the cruise period. This indicated background characteristics of marine aerosol particle distributions in the marine environment. During the cruise period, comparisons of the time series of NCs between the two aerosol particle modes were made, as shown in Fig. 3b. The temporal trend of the NC of accumulation mode was approximately consistent with the coarse mode. The correlation coefficient between these two modes was approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, there were some differences in the NC of the different particle sizes in aerosols caused by the different marine aerosol sources. We also found that the temporal trend of accumulation mode was more variable than that of coarse mode, suggesting the accumulation mode may be more obviously influenced by changes in the marine environment.</p>
      <p id="d2e2830">For the meteorological parameters, the ship remained in the northeast trade winds during the entire cruise period; therefore, this mainly led to south-westerly and southerly winds, as shown in Fig. 3c. Figure 3d represented air temperature and water temperature. The observed air temperature was consistent with MERRA-2 reanalyzed air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.719</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SST over the whole observation period were closer to 29.0  and 29.7 °C, respectively. RH had a negative correlation with the visibility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the average RH and VIS were equal to 83.0 % and 45.1 km. Since wind is a major driver of marine aerosol production and transport, we attempted to explain marine aerosol NCs of the accumulation mode and the coarse mode as the functions of the WS and WD (Fig. 4a, b). The RH and the rainfall intensity observations were used to aid analysis (Fig. 4c, d). High NCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 cm<sup>−3</sup>) were observed almost entirely in which the WD were between NW and N that were caused by the high RH accompanied by the rainfall events, and distributions of NCs were uniform when the wind was blowing in the other directions.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2895"><bold>(a)</bold> NC of the aerosol accumulation mode, <bold>(b)</bold> NC of the aerosol coarse mode, <bold>(c)</bold> RH, and <bold>(d)</bold> rainfall intensity as the functions of the WS and WD for the observations in the SCS.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2917">The scatter plots of <bold>(a)</bold> NCs of the aerosol accumulation mode and WS, <bold>(b)</bold> NCs of the aerosol coarse mode and WS. The observational data were binned to the WS intervals equal to 3 m s<sup>−1</sup>; the boxes represented the 25th to 75th percentile value, the black whisker represented the 1.5 inter-quartile range, the black diamond marker represented the mean value, and the black horizontal line represented the median value in the box plots.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2945">Figure 5 showed variations of NCs of two aerosol particle modes with WS, and observational data were binned at 3 m s<sup>−1</sup> WS intervals. The variations in NCs with WS observed in this study were consistent with a previous study (Bruch et al., 2023). For example, marine aerosol NCs generated by the bubble bursting process at low WS showed little variation, and the low WS was insufficient to activate spume droplet production (Pietsch et al., 2018; Russell et al., 2023). Consequently, no significant variation in NCs were observed in the 0–6 m s<sup>−1</sup> WS range. NCs increased with the increase in WS from 6 to 15 m s<sup>−1</sup>; however, the increase slowed down when WS exceeded 13 m s<sup>−1</sup>. Previous study proposed that this phenomenon may be linked to the scavenging of marine aerosols through collision by the larger water drops at high WS (Pant et al., 2009).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Marine aerosol distributions in the different distance from the coast</title>
      <p id="d2e3004">This marine scientific research campaign started southward from the harbor of Zhanjiang (21°16<sup>′</sup>21.12<sup>′′</sup> N, 110°23<sup>′</sup>45.17<sup>′′</sup> E) on 21 May and reached up to the southernmost (8°5<sup>′</sup> N) point of this cruise on 3 June. In different latitudes of the SCS, there were vastly different marine aerosol distribution characteristics, meteorological parameters, and marine aerosol transport sources. Therefore, we assessed the features of marine aerosol distribution at various distances from the coast. We conducted real-time analysis of the 72 h backward trajectories of air masses at the ship's location (Fig. 6a, b). The backward trajectory analysis indicated that the air masses had last passed over continental areas on 22 May 2023, 11:00 LT, at a point 50 km from the coast (the red solid lines in Fig. 6b). Consequently, for all sampling locations within this 50 km boundary, the air masses had directly passed over mainland areas. This meant they carried continental and anthropogenic aerosols that ultimately influenced the aerosol distributions (Braun et al., 2020; Wu and Boor, 2021). For regions more than 50 km from the coast, the backward trajectory results consistently showed that the air masses did not pass over any mainland areas before reaching the sampling site (the blue solid lines in Fig. 6a). The prevailing wind direction was primarily from the southwest (Fig. 3c) in these regions, so aerosols could not be directly transported from the continent to the ship's location. Additionally, continental and anthropogenic aerosols, which were emitted from islands and countries surrounding the SCS, lost their original characteristics through the long-duration (over 72 h) transport. These aerosols likely underwent dry deposition, wet deposition, and aging processes associated with long-range transport. Such processes could have led to the removal of continental aerosols or their gradual dilution and mixing with natural aerosols (Hodshire et al., 2019; Ohata et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2021). Over time, the continental and anthropogenic aerosols may have transformed into or been integrated with the background aerosols. Hence, 50 km from the coast was taken as the boundary distance to distinguish offshore and pelagic regions in this study. We could analyze differences in aerosol transport and production in offshore and pelagic regions. To eliminate the effects of rainfall on aerosol concentrations, we removed aerosol data associated with rainfall intensity greater than 1 mm h<sup>−1</sup> during the observation period.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3073"><bold>(a)</bold> The 72 h backward trajectory air mass source traces in the offshore (red solid lines) and pelagic (blue solid lines) regions. The light purple solid lines represented the ship track. <bold>(b)</bold> Detailed map of the backward trajectory air mass source traces passing through the mainland areas (© Google Earth). The white arrows represented the direction of air mass transport.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3089">Classification of the shipboard observation path in the SCS: <bold>(a)</bold> Accumulation and coarse mode particle sizes graded NCs in the offshore and pelagic regions. For the box plots, the boxes represented the 25th to 75th percentile value, the black whisker represented the maximum and minimum range, the black triangle represented the 1.5 inter-quartile range, the black diamond marker represented the mean value, and the black horizontal line represented the median value. <bold>(b)</bold> The NCs of average size distributions (the solid lines and circles) and standard deviations (the shaded areas) for marine aerosols of 0.5 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m diameters in the offshore and pelagic regions. <bold>(c)</bold> The daily average variations of the proportions and the NCs of two aerosol particle modes were shown with distances from the coast. <bold>(d)</bold> The distributions of marine aerosol composition in the offshore and pelagic regions. The pie charts showed the average aerosol composition based on the mass concentrations from the Merra-2 aerosol dataset during the whole cruise period.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3119">Figure 7 revealed marine aerosol distribution characteristics with different modes in the SCS. From Fig. 7a, we can find that NCs of different aerosol particle modes in offshore regions showed significant differences from those in pelagic regions. The average summed NC in offshore regions during the cruise period was 108.25 cm<sup>−3</sup>, registering a 1.2-fold increase compared to NC in pelagic regions (49.22 cm<sup>−3</sup>). The NC of accumulation mode in offshore regions was 105.57 cm<sup>−3</sup>, and it was 47.65 cm<sup>−3</sup> in pelagic regions. The average accumulation mode NC in offshore regions was 2.2 times higher than that in pelagic regions, with a statistically difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001). Similarly, the comparison of the coarse mode NC revealed the same result as that for the accumulation mode. The coarse mode NC in the offshore regions (2.68 cm<sup>−3</sup>) was also significantly higher than that in pelagic regions (1.57 cm<sup>−3</sup>), with a statistically significant difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001). Figure 7b showed the number size distribution for marine aerosols of 0.5 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m diameters in the offshore and pelagic regions, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the number size distribution. The comparisons in Fig. 7b showed that the number size distributions in the offshore and pelagic regions exhibited a bimodal distribution, and the peak values both occurred at 0.542 and 1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, which were consistent with the previous studies (Andronache, 2003; Braun et al., 2020). The number size distributions exhibited a relatively stable value in the 0.835–1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size range. Due to aerosol transport, continental air masses may have carried continental and anthropogenic aerosols, which could have ultimately affected aerosol distributions in the 0.5–5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size range. The number size distributions in the offshore regions were obviously higher than in the pelagic regions in the 0.5–5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size range. These findings were consistent with previous studies (Braun et al., 2020; Lorenzo et al., 2023). However, in the 5.0–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size range, the number size distributions from offshore and pelagic regions were largely consistent, and this consistency remained robust against instrumentation limitations. This comparability persists despite APS measurements in this range having inherent uncertainties reaching up to 130 % (Pfeifer et al., 2016), primarily due to inefficient particle detection at concentrations approaching 1 cm<sup>−3</sup>. Throughout the cruise, continuous 5 s sampling yielded 64 180 valid samples, which through statistical averaging reduced measurement uncertainty to 0.5 %. At this negligible level, the distribution characteristics and cross-regional correlations are considered reliably preserved.</p>
      <p id="d2e3308">Figure 7c revealed a decreasing trend in NCs with increasing distance from the coast, and the correlation coefficients between the daily average NCs of accumulation mode, coarse mode, and the summed NCs and the distance from the coast were calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The correlation analysis, based on hourly average NCs of accumulation and coarse modes versus the distance from the coast, yielded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for offshore regions, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for pelagic regions. The same was true for the summed NC; the correlation coefficient between the hourly average summed NC and the distance was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the offshore regions and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the pelagic regions. These correlations indicated that the correlation between distance from the coast and NC was mainly reflected in the offshore regions and had almost no significant correlation with marine aerosol in the pelagic regions. In offshore regions, aerosol NC was influenced by continental aerosol transport. This influence diminished with increasing distance from the coast. After the ship entered the pelagic regions, the influence of continental air mass transport almost disappeared. Marine aerosol NCs were lower in pelagic regions compared to offshore regions.</p>
      <p id="d2e3414">Table 3 revealed differences in meteorological parameters between offshore regions and pelagic regions. For example, the average WS in offshore regions was 10.74 m s<sup>−1</sup>, slightly higher than that in pelagic regions (8.64 m s<sup>−1</sup>). Higher WS can enhance marine aerosol production. Therefore, there was a higher production of aerosols in offshore regions. In addition, the offshore regions were relatively close to the coastline (Fig. 6b). Compared to pelagic regions, southwest and west winds in offshore regions could directly transport continental and anthropogenic aerosols to the ship's location from Guangdong and Hainan, China. Therefore, aerosol transport was higher in offshore regions. Figure 7d indicated a difference in the distribution of marine aerosol composition between offshore and pelagic regions. In the offshore regions, the proportions of dust (DUST<sub>10</sub>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and sulfate aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were 5.04 % and 1.36 %, which were higher than those in the pelagic regions (1.45 % and 0.97 %, respectively). The higher concentrations of dust and sulfate aerosols may further indicate that continental aerosols have influenced the aerosol composition in the offshore regions (Geng et al., 2023; VanCuren, 2003). In the pelagic regions, the proportions of dimethyl sulfide (DMS), organic carbon (OC), and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) were 0.15 %, 1.2 %, and 1.7 %. These proportions were higher than those in the offshore regions (0.1 %, 0.84 %, and 0.56 %, respectively) due to the more frequent marine biological activities (e.g. phytoplankton metabolism) in the pelagic environments. For instance, phytoplankton releases DMS through cellular metabolism and cellular lysis (Saliba et al., 2020); DMS then undergoes atmospheric oxidation to form SO<sub>2</sub> (Kettle and Andreae, 2000). Additionally, phytoplankton produces OC (O'Dowd et al., 2002). These marine biological activities directly contribute to higher proportions of DMS, SO<sub>2</sub>, and OC in pelagic regions. The proportion of sea salt aerosol (SEAS<sub>10</sub>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) in the pelagic regions (94.33 %) was higher than that in the offshore regions (91.9 %), indicating a significant contribution of SEAS<sub>10</sub> to the total marine aerosols in the pelagic environments. To sum up, our results indicated that the distance from the coast had a great influence on marine aerosol production and transport. It ultimately led to obvious differences between size distributions of marine aerosols in the offshore and pelagic regions.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3568">Distributions of NCs for different aerosol particle modes in different ocean regions. Mean and SD, respectively, represent the mean values and standard deviations of the related meteorological parameters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Observation Area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center">South China Sea </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Route Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Offshore Region </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Pelagic Region </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Marine Aerosol Parameters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Accumulation Mode (cm<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">105.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coarse Mode (cm<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sum (cm<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">108.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">49.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Accumulation Mode/Sum (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">97.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">96.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coarse Mode/Sum (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Meteorological Parameters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WS (m s<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RH (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">91.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">82.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OBS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (°C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SST (°C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Diurnal variation of NCs and their affecting factors in pelagic regions</title>
      <p id="d2e3875">The results of Sect. 3.2 showed that distributions and composition of marine aerosols in different regions were influenced by marine production and continental transport. Among them, the degree of impact on marine transport and background aerosols caused by continental transport and marine production differs greatly due to differences in the degree of continental transport and marine biological activities at different distances from the coast. Beyond that, many meteorological parameters, such as WS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SST, and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, might influence concentration and distribution of marine aerosols. It is expected that there are diurnal differences. Therefore, we analyzed the diurnal variations of NCs and the correlations between NCs and different meteorological parameters in this section. In pelagic regions, the sources of 72 h backward trajectory air masses were from the ocean, and observational data were processed to exclude the continental influence. These aerosol data conformed to clean marine periods, which were proposed by Saliba et al. (2019) to extract relatively clean marine aerosol data; these NCs thus distinctly represented characteristics of local production of marine aerosol in these regions.</p>
      <p id="d2e3908">Figure 8a showed diurnal variations of the mean values of summed NCs in the pelagic region. To better compare the diurnal variation, we divided the data into different periods according to sunrise and sunset times. Consequently, we selected the sunrise and sunset moments, along with the surrounding one-hour interval, as the transition periods to eliminate the effects of day-to-night transitions. Figure 8a showed a clear diurnal variation trend. For accumulation mode, the NCs remained falling trend in the nighttime (00:00–03:00 and 21:00–23:00 LT), and they began steadily rising in the night-to-day transition (NDT) period (04:00–06:00 LT). Then they showed a slight upward trend during the daytime (07:00–17:00 LT), but began to fall steadily during the day-to-night transition (DNT) period (18:00–20:00 LT). We also found that NCs exhibited apparent differences between the daytime and nighttime, and tended to increase or decrease significantly during the transition periods.</p>
      <p id="d2e3911">Comparisons of size distributions (Fig. 8b) showed that number size distributions exhibit a relatively stable value in the 0.835–1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size range, and subtle differences emerged in this particle range. Quantitatively, peak diameter varied slightly across periods: 0.571 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m in nighttime, 0.567 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m in the NDT period, 0.569 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m in daytime, and 0.570 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m in the DNT period. More notably, the peak value was 147.05 cm<sup>−3</sup> in nighttime, then rose to 155.87 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the NDT period, further increased to 165.60 cm<sup>−3</sup> in daytime, and reached the highest value of 206.79 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the DNT period, registering a 0.4-fold increase relative to the nighttime baseline. The peak value showed a clear and continuous increasing trend, which may reveal variations in aerosol production. In addition, all size distributions for marine aerosols had the same shape. The consistent shape can be explained by their common marine origin and production mechanisms. The NCs of different aerosol particle modes in different periods were counted in Fig. 8c, and we can find that the average summed NCs were significantly different in different periods. Specifically, the summed NC was 44.03 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the nighttime, and 47.5 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the first transition period (i.e. NDT), but it was 49.28 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the daytime, and reached the highest (59.59 cm<sup>−3</sup>) in the second transition period (i.e. DNT). The differences were all statistically significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01). The comparisons of the accumulation modes were consistent with those of the summed NCs. The NC of the accumulation mode was 42.43 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the nighttime, 45.90 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the NDT period, 47.62 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the daytime, and 57.91 cm<sup>−3</sup> in the DNT period. The differences were also statistically significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01). There were pronounced diurnal NC variations, with maximum differences of 35 % observed between daytime, nighttime, and transition periods. However, there were no significant differences in the NCs of the coarse modes between different periods, as mentioned above, which were 1.60, 1.58, 1.66, and 1.68 cm<sup>−3</sup>, respectively.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4145"><bold>(a)</bold> Diurnal variations of the total mean values of the NCs in the different aerosol particle modes. The vertical bars showed the standard errors (the shadow areas represented the transition periods between daytime and nighttime). <bold>(b)</bold> The NCs of average size distributions for marine aerosols of 0.5 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m diameters in different time periods. <bold>(c)</bold> The NCs of the different aerosol particle modes in different time periods. For the box plots, the boxes represented the 25th to 75th percentile value, the black whisker represented the maximum and minimum range, the black triangle represented the 1.5 inter-quartile range, the black diamond marker represented the mean value, and the black horizontal line represented the median value.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e4172"><bold>(a)</bold> The correlation coefficients between the NCs of all aerosol particle modes and different meteorological parameters. Correlation plot showing the Pearson correlation values of all marine aerosol NCs and meteorological parameters measured in pelagic regions. <bold>(b)</bold> The comparisons between the diurnal variations of summed NCs, SST, SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and WS.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4201">To explore the reasons for these differences, we further analyzed the correlation coefficients between the NCs and the meteorological parameters (Fig. 9a). The correlation coefficients were 0.41 for the coarse mode, 0.57 for the accumulation mode, and 0.58 for summed NCs. This correlation suggested that the NCs of all aerosol particle modes have positive correlations with the WSs. By contrast, negative correlations between SST and NC were found, which were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and the NCs were low in the time periods with high SST. Compared to the WS and SST, our results showed that SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a negative correlation with NCs, with correlation coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 9b showed that WS was lower during nighttime, and SST and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were higher, resulting in NCs lower than those in daytime. In the NDT period, WS did not change significantly, but an obvious decrease in the SST and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found, ultimately resulting in a noticeable increase in NCs. In this period, SST and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were the dominant factors. However, in the DNT period, NCs were highest due to the lowest values of SST and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the highest WS. In this period, the significant reduction in the WS led to a decrease in NCs. From the above analysis, the meteorological parameters have a joint impact on the production and distribution of marine aerosols.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Influence of the WS on marine aerosol NCs</title>
      <p id="d2e4347">Our measurement results provided robust evidence for wind-driven marine aerosol production mechanism in the pelagic region. In all SST intervals, we observed a positive correlation between WS and NCs of all aerosol particle modes (Fig. 10), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values greater than 0.8. In the pelagic region, the NCs were strongly influenced by the local production of marine aerosols, which had a relatively short lifetime compared with continental aerosols (Liu et al., 2005; Qureshi et al., 2009). Under the influence of sea surface wind, ocean wave fluctuations and sea surface friction may increase with intensified wind stresses. Air bubbles generated and present on the sea surface might rupture to form numerous water droplets, which could eventually produce primary marine aerosol after evaporation and crystallization processes (Blanchard and Woodcock, 1980; Saliba et al., 2019). Therefore, increased WS may both intensify bubble rupture by enhancing sea surface friction and promote air-sea gas transfer (Jaeglé et al., 2011; Mårtensson et al., 2003). These processes might elevate the production of marine aerosols and natural marine precursors, ultimately raising the NCs in the pelagic region.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e4359">The NCs versus WS in the pelagic region. The NC of all aerosol particle modes versus WS for 28–29 °C <bold>(a)</bold>, 29–30 °C <bold>(b)</bold>, and 30–31 °C <bold>(c)</bold> SST intervals. The error bars represented the standard deviations. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represented the Pearson correlation coefficients, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were performed to test whether the correlations were significant.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Influence of the SST and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on marine aerosol NCs</title>
      <p id="d2e4415">Although WS can partly explain the variability of NCs, NCs exhibited a negative dependence on SST in all WS intervals. To analyze how SST influenced NCs in the pelagic region, Fig. S4 showed the NCs of all aerosol particle modes versus SST (28 °C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SST <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31 °C) in the WS intervals, in which WS was approximately constant. The design may largely exclude the influences of WS on NC. A negative correlation existed between SST and NCs for WS of 0–15 m s<sup>−1</sup> in the SCS, with all their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values being more negative than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S4). The steeper negative slope observed for the accumulation mode, compared to the coarse mode, pointed to a greater responsiveness of its NC to changes in SST, suggesting that accumulation mode particles might be more sensitive to these variations. This observed negative correlation between SST and NCs was inconsistent with some laboratory studies (Keene et al., 2017; Forestieri et al., 2018) but consistent with other laboratory studies (Christiansen et al., 2019; Salter et al., 2014; Zábori et al., 2012b). These laboratory studies have shown disparate results, which may stem from differences in experimental setups (e.g. plunging jet, water jet, or diffuser systems) or the water types used (e.g. natural, artificial, or synthetic seawater). A recent field study also reported decreasing NCs with rising SST based on shipborne measurements in the North Atlantic (Lehahn et al., 2014). In pelagic region of the SCS, combined evidence from prior studies (Christiansen et al., 2019; Lehahn et al., 2014; Salter et al., 2014; Zábori et al., 2012b) and our observational negative trends suggested that elevated SST may suppress near-surface air entrainment volumes, consequently decreasing plunging jets. Near-surface air entrainment volumes and plunging jets were changed. Accordingly, the bubble rupture changed. Small daughter bubbles (secondary bubbles with smaller diameters, generated at the edges of central bubbles) were likely produced because larger central bubbles (the primary bubbles rising to the sea surface) ruptured; then, these smaller bubbles could produce submicron aerosol. These daughter bubbles are critical for the formation of submicron marine aerosols (Miguet et al., 2021; Sellegri et al., 2023). The generation of daughter bubbles decreases with an increasing ratio of seawater density to viscosity and a decreasing ratio of seawater viscosity to surface tension. Therefore, under increasing SST, the ratio of seawater density to viscosity might increase and the ratio of seawater viscosity to surface tension might decrease, and the number of sea surface bubbles might decrease (Miguet et al., 2021; Sellegri et al., 2023). Therefore, these factors might ultimately result in decreased marine aerosol NCs, especially for the accumulation mode, with the increasing SST in the SCS.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e4463">The relationship between the NC of all aerosol particle modes and WS <bold>(a)</bold>, SST <bold>(b)</bold>, and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold>. The error bars represented the standard deviations. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represented the Pearson correlation coefficients, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were performed to test whether the correlations were significant.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/18227/2025/acp-25-18227-2025-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e4511">Compared to the WS and SST, SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can better reflect the variations of the NCs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 11). The correlations can explain that NCs had a significant negative correlation with the SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SST <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 °C). Figures S5 and S6 illustrated the NC of all aerosol particle modes versus SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively for WS and SST intervals, and further presented this negative correlation under controlled WS and SST intervals. Prior studies (Lewis and Schwartz, 2004; Yuan et al., 2019) had suggested that SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be related to atmospheric stability and play a role in air convection, mechanical mixing over the ocean, and plume rise processes. Song et al. (2023) had also indicated that SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influence marine aerosol production by affecting atmospheric stability and thus the interfacial and effective production fluxes of marine aerosols by affecting the sea state, sea wave, and the process of the whitecap formation. Combining these previous inferences with our observational negative correlation between SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NCs, it was plausible that SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could influence marine aerosol transport (e.g. potential upward transport driven by plume rise) and production. For example, increased SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may intensify plume rise, leading to reduced NCs near the sea surface. Additionally, increased SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might indirectly decrease aerosol production by altering atmospheric stability. These phenomena might be an important factor affecting the differences in the marine aerosol NC distributions; they might also be important for the abovementioned different conclusions of the previous studies on the relationship between the SST and NCs. The differences in the SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might cause the inter-study differences despite the consistent SST during the experiment and should be considered further in subsequent targeted research. In summary, the SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might influence the marine aerosol transport and production processes, resulting in differences in NCs. Hence, the SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be a new and significant parameter to better quantify the impact on the marine aerosol transport and production in the SCS.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e4742">This study utilized cruise-based observational data collected from 21 May to 15 June 2023 to examine marine aerosol NCs and composition within the data-sparse SCS. Measurements revealed accumulation mode (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), coarse mode (1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), and summed NCs of 52.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34.96, 1.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.83, and 54.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35.37 cm<sup>−3</sup>, respectively. Analysis of marine aerosol size distributions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) exhibited a bimodal structure, with modes at 0.542 and 1.981 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Spatial characterization of NCs and aerosol composition between offshore and pelagic regions revealed distinct differences, demonstrating that distance from the coast significantly influences distributions due to variations in aerosol transport and production. Furthermore, meteorological parameters, particularly SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were shown to potentially induce changes in aerosol transport and production, ultimately leading to differences in NCs. Diurnal cycles in meteorological parameters also drove pronounced aerosol NCs variations, especially during daytime-nighttime transitions. Collectively, these findings proved to be key explanations of spatiotemporal marine aerosol variations in the SCS and their potential influencing factors.</p>
      <p id="d2e4912">The results obtained in the SCS demonstrated that distributions of marine aerosol NCs and composition depended on distance from the coast. In offshore regions, aerosol composition was strongly influenced by anthropogenic activities and continental transport, with both elevated NCs and higher proportions of continental aerosol composition (DUST<sub>10</sub>) compared to pelagic regions. Furthermore, NCs exhibited a negative correlation with distance from the coast, and this trend was consistent with diminishing continental aerosol concentrations. Conversely, marine-derived composition (SEAS<sub>10</sub> and DMS) dominated in pelagic regions, reflecting intensified marine aerosol production.</p>
      <p id="d2e4934">The influences of meteorological parameters on marine aerosols differed in pelagic regions. Increasing WS likely drove ocean wave fluctuations and heightened sea surface friction, promoting aerosol particle production. Conversely, rising SST could reduce plunging jet intensity and entrapped air volume, thereby potentially altering bubble rupture processes and decreasing NCs. Notably, SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited the strongest correlation with NCs. Higher SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> likely reduced interfacial and effective aerosol production fluxes while intensifying vertical transport, collectively lowering NCs. WS, SST, and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> displayed distinct diurnal cycles, which may drive a distinct diurnal variation in NCs. Compared with the daytime, the combination of lower WS and higher SST and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> caused lower NCs at nighttime. During sunrise and sunset, rapid variations in meteorological parameters triggered NC fluctuations. In the NDT transition (the transition period<sub>1</sub>), stable WS left SST and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as dominant NC regulators. In the DNT transition (the transition period<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, all aforementioned three factors jointly influenced NCs.</p>
      <p id="d2e5034">Overall, this study filled data gaps and updated observational data for the SCS, while comprehensively analyzing diurnal variations in marine aerosols, impacts of continental transport, and potential influencing factors, especially SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among meteorological parameters. These findings enable subsequent refinement of traditional marine aerosol source functions, which rely solely on WS and SST. However, short-duration cruise data limited robust theoretical conclusions about SST and SST-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effects on aerosols. Additionally, validating sea surface phenomena (e.g. whitecap coverage, an indicator of wave-driven aerosol production) against meteorological parameters remains challenging due to scarce in site observations. Thus, more detailed observations and laboratory experiments will be critical in future studies to validate proposed influences of meteorological parameters and specific mechanisms underlying aerosol production and transport.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5072">All data from this research are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5075">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-18227-2025-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-18227-2025-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5084">SC designed this study. ZQ and HX performed the measurements during the cruise. MZ, TL and YP implemented the back trajectory analysis. ZQ, XL, ZZ and SC analyzed the data. ZQ, SC and XW wrote the paper. All co-authors proofread and commented on the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5090">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5096">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5102">The authors acknowledge the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences for supporting this research cruise. The authors thank Kun Zhang and Haoda Yang for helping install the instruments. The authors thank the Max-Planck Society for the provision of the PLC model used in this study. The authors thank the NOAA ARL for the provision of the HYSPLIT transport and dispersion model used in this study. The ERA5 hourly dataset used in this study was provided by the ECMWF, and the MERRA-2 dataset was provided by the GMAO at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5107">This study was funded by the National 173 Basic Strengthening Program (E23D0Ha25T2), Key Scientific Research Project of Anhui Education Department (2022AH051712), Dreams Foundation of Jianghuai Advance Technology Center (2023-ZM01K015), and Scientific Research Foundation for the Advanced Talents, Chaohu University (KYQD-202208).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5113">This paper was edited by Lynn M. Russell and reviewed by Georges Saliba and two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Li, Q. B., Yantosca, R. M., Savarino, J., Lee, C. C. W., and Thiemens, M. H.: Sulphate formation in sea-salt aerosols: Constraints from oxygen isotopes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D1037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005659</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Crutzen, P. J.: Atmospheric aerosols: Biogeochemical sources and role in atmospheric chemistry, Science, 276, 1052–1058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5315.1052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.276.5315.1052</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions. part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Andreas, E. L.: A new sea spray generation function for wind speeds up to 32 m s<sup>−1</sup>, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 2175–2184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;2175:ANSSGF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;2175:ANSSGF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Andreas, E. L.: Spray-mediated enthalpy flux to the atmosphere and salt flux to the ocean in high winds, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40, 608–619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4232.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JPO4232.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Andronache, C.: Estimated variability of below-cloud aerosol removal by rainfall for observed aerosol size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 131–143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-131-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-131-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Athanasopoulou, E., Protonotariou, A., Papangelis, G., Tombrou, M., Mihalopoulos, N., and Gerasopoulos, E.: Long-range transport of Saharan dust and chemical transformations over the Eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Environ., 140, 592–604, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.041</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Atwood, S. A., Reid, J. S., Kreidenweis, S. M., Blake, D. R., Jonsson, H. H., Lagrosas, N. D., Xian, P., Reid, E. A., Sessions, W. R., and Simpas, J. B.: Size-resolved aerosol and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) properties in the remote marine South China Sea – Part 1: Observations and source classification, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1105–1123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1105-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1105-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Arimoto, R. and Duce, R. A.: Dry deposition models and the air/sea exchange of trace elements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 91, 2787–2792, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD091iD02p02787" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD091iD02p02787</ext-link>, 1986. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Atlas, E. and Giam, C. S.: Ambient Concentration and Precipitation Scavenging of Atmospheric Organic Pollutants, Water Air Soil Poll., 38, 19–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00279583</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K., Faluvegi, G., Kelley, M., Lo, K. K., Miller, R. L., Nazarenko, L., Schmidt, G. A., and Wu, J. B.: Historical (1850–2014) aerosol evolution and role on climate forcing using the GISS ModelE2.1 contribution to CMIP6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001978</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bird, J. C., de Ruiter, R., Courbin, L., and Stone, H. A.: Daughter bubble cascades produced by folding of ruptured thin films, Nature, 465, 759–762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature09069</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Blanchard, D. C. and Woodcock, A. H.: The production, concentration, and vertical distribution of the sea-salt aerosol, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 338, 330–347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb17130.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb17130.x</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Braun, R. A., Aghdam, M. A., Bañaga, P. A., Betito, G., Cambaliza, M. O., Cruz, M. T., Lorenzo, G. R., MacDonald, A. B., Simpas, J. B., Stahl, C., and Sorooshian, A.: Long-range aerosol transport and impacts on size-resolved aerosol composition in Metro Manila, Philippines, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2387–2405, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2387-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2387-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Bruch, W., Yohia, C., Tulet, P., Limoges, A., Sutherland, P., van Eijk, A. M. J., Missamou, T., and Piazzola, J.: Atmospheric sea spray modeling in the North-East Atlantic Ocean using tunnel-derived generation functions and the SUMOS cruise data set, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD038330, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038330" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD038330</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Bzdek, B. R., Reid, J. P., and Cotterell, M. I.: Open questions on the physical properties of aerosols, Comm. Chem., 3, 105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-020-00342-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s42004-020-00342-9</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Cai, M., Liang, B., Sun, Q., Zhou, S., Chen, X., Yuan, B., Shao, M., Tan, H., and Zhao, J.: Effects of continental emissions on cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity in the northern South China Sea during summertime 2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9153–9167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9153-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-9153-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Carslaw, K. S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Rae, J. G. L., Woodward, S., and Kulmala, M.: A review of natural aerosol interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Chen, S. P., Lu, C. H., McQueen, J., and Lee, P.: Application of satellite observations in conjunction with aerosol reanalysis to characterize long-range transport of African and Asian dust on air quality in the contiguous U.S., Atmos. Environ., 187, 174–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.038</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Christiansen, S., Salter, M. E., Gorokhova, E., Nguyen, Q. T., and Bilde, M.: Sea spray aerosol formation: Laboratory results on the role of air entrainment, water temperature, and phytoplankton biomass, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 13107–13116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b04078</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Dasarathy, S., Russell, L. M., Rodier, S. D., and Bowman, J. S.: Wind-Driven and Seasonal Effects on Marine Aerosol Production in the Bellingshausen Sea, Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2022GL099723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099723" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022GL099723</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Rinaldi, M., Paglione, M., Fuzzi, S., Stephanou, E. G., Tziaras, T., Spyros, A., Ceburnis, D., O'Dowd, C., Dall'Osto, M., Harrison, R. M., Allan, J., Coe, H., and Facchini, M. C.: Primary and secondary marine aerosols over the North Atlantic Ocean during the MAP experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D22210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016204</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Dedrick, J. L., Saliba, G., Williams, A. S., Russell, L. M., and Lubin, D.: Retrieval of the sea spray aerosol mode from submicron particle size distributions and supermicron scattering during LASIC, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4171–4194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4171-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-4171-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Ding, J., Dai, Q., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Huangfu, Y., and Feng, Y.: Air humidity affects secondary aerosol formation in different pathways, Sci. Total Environ., 759, 143540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143540</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Duce, R. A., Winchester, J. W., and Van Nahl, T. W.: Iodine, bromine, and chlorine in the Hawaiian marine atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 1775–1799, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i008p01775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JZ070i008p01775</ext-link>, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Eriksson, E.: The yearly circulation of chloride and sulfur in nature: Meteorological, geochemical and pedological implications. Part II, Tellus, 12, 63–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1960.tb01284.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1960.tb01284.x</ext-link>, 1960.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Feingold, G., Cotton, W. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Davis, J. T.: Impact of giant cloud condensation nuclei on drizzle formation in marine stratocumulus: Implications for cloud radiative properties, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 4100–4117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;4100:TIOGCC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;4100:TIOGCC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Flores, J., Bourdin, G., Altaratz, O., Trainic, M., Lang-Yona, N., Dzimban, E., Steinau, S., Tettich, F., Planes, S., Allemand, D., Agostini, S., Banaigs, B., Boissin, E., Boss, E., Douville, E., Forcioli, D., Furla, P., Galand, P. E., Sullivan, M. B., Gilson, É., Lombard, F., Moulin, C., Pesant, S., Poulain, J., Reynaud, S., Romac, S., Sunagawa, S., Thomas, O. P., Troublé, R., de Vargas, C., Vega Thurber, R., Voolstra, C. R., Wincker, P., Zoccola, D., Bowler, C., Gorsky, G., Rudich, Y., Vardi, A., and Koren, I.: Tara Pacific Expedition's Atmospheric Measurements of Marine Aerosols across the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans: Overview and Preliminary Results, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, 536–554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0224.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0224.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Flores, J. M., Bourdin, G., Kostinski, A. B., Altaratz, O., Dagan, G., Lombard, F., Haëntjens, N., Boss, E., Sullivan, M. B., Gorsky, G., Lang-Yona, N., Trainic, M., Romac, S., Voolstra, C. R., Rudich, Y., Vardi, A., and Koren, I.: Diel cycle of sea spray aerosol concentration, Nat. Commun., 12, 5476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25579-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-021-25579-3</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Forestieri, S. D., Moore, K. A., Martinez Borrero, R., Wang, A., Stokes, M. D., and Cappa, C. D.: Temperature and Composition Dependence of Sea Spray Aerosol Production, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 7218-7225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL078193</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G. K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Geng, X., Haig, J., Lin, B., Tian, C., Zhu, S., Cheng, Z., Yuan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Zheng, M., Li, J., Zhong, G., Zhao, S., Bird, M. I., and Zhang, G.: Provenance of Aerosol Black Carbon over Northeast Indian Ocean and South China Sea and Implications for Oceanic Black Carbon Cycling, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 13067–13078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03481" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.3c03481</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Gong, S. L.: A parameterization of sea-salt aerosol source function for sub- and super-micron particles, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1097, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003gb002079</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Croft, B., Martin, R. V., Moore, R. H., Ziemba, L. D., Crosbie, E. C., Liu, H., Russell, L. M., Saliba, G., Wisthaler, A., Müller, M., Schiller, A., Galí, M., Chang, R. Y.-W., McDuffie, E. E., Bilsback, K. R., and Pierce, J. R.: Factors controlling marine aerosol size distributions and their climate effects over the northwest Atlantic Ocean region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1889–1916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1889-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1889-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Han, S., Cai, Z., Liu, J., Zhang, M., Chen, J., and Lin, Y.: Comparison on aerosol physicochemical properties of sea and land along the coast of Bohai, China, Sci. Total Environ., 673, 148–156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.040</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Hodshire, A. L., Akherati, A., Alvarado, M. J., Brown-Steiner, B., Jathar, S. H., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., Lonsdale, C. R., Onasch, T. B., Ortega, A. M., and Pierce, J. R.: Aging Effects on Biomass Burning Aerosol Mass and Composition: A Critical Review of Field and Laboratory Studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 10007–10022, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b02588</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Hoppel, W. A.: Measurement of the size distribution and CCN supersaturation spectrum of submicron aerosols over the ocean, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 2006–2015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036&lt;2006:MOTSDA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036&lt;2006:MOTSDA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Hoppel, W. A., Fitzgerald, J. W., and Larson, R. E.: Aerosol size distributions in air masses advecting off the east coast of the United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 90, 2365–2379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD090iD01p02365" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD090iD01p02365</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B., and Lin, J.-T.: Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and remote sensing observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3137–3157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, B., Xie, Z., Lam, P. K. S., He, P., Yue, F., Wang, L., Huang, Y., Kang, H., Yu, X., and Wu, X.: Spatial and temporal distribution of sea salt aerosol mass concentrations in the marine boundary layer from the Arctic to the Antarctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033892, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033892</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Jing, Z., Chang, P., Shan, X., Wang, S., Wu, L., and Kurian, J.: Mesoscale SST dynamics in the Kuroshio–Oyashio extension region, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 49, 1339–1352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0159.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-18-0159.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Joung, Y. S. and Buie, C. R.: Aerosol generation by raindrop impact on soil, Nat. Commun., 6, 6083, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7083" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms7083</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Keene, W. C., Long, M. S., Reid, J. S., Frossard, A. A., Kieber, D. J., Maben, J. R., Russell, L. M., Kinsey, J. D., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T. S.: Factors that modulate properties of primary marine aerosol generated from ambient seawater on ships at sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11961–11990, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026872" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026872</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Kettle, A. J. and Andreae, M. O.: Flux of dimethylsulfide from the oceans: A comparison of updated data sets and flux models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 26793–26808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900252" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900252</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Kim, J. H., Yum, S. S., Lee, Y.-G., and Choi, B.-C.: Ship measurements of submicron aerosol size distributions over the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea, Atmos. Res., 93, 700–714, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.02.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.02.011</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation> Kong, Y. W., Sheng, L. F., Liu, Q., and Li, X. Z.: Impact of marine atmospheric process on aerosol number size distribution in the South China Sea, Environ. Sci., 37, 2443–2452, 2016 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Korhonen, H., Carslaw, K. S., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., and Woodhouse, M. T.: Influence of oceanic dimethyl sulfide emissions on cloud condensation nuclei concentrations and seasonality over the remote Southern Hemisphere oceans: a global model study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D15204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009718</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Lawler, M. J., Sander, R., Carpenter, L. J., Lee, J. D., von Glasow, R., Sommariva, R., and Saltzman, E. S.: HOCl and Cl2 observations in marine air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7617–7628, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7617-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7617-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Leck, C. and Persson, C.: Seasonal and short-term variability in dimethyl sulfide, sulfur dioxide and biogenic sulfur and sea salt aerosol particles in the arctic marine boundary layer during summer and autumn, Tellus B, 48, 272–299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v48i2.15891" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v48i2.15891</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Lehahn, Y., Koren, I., Rudich, Y., Bidle, K. D., Trainic, M., Flores, J. M., Sharoni, S., and Vardi, A.: Decoupling atmospheric and oceanic factors affecting aerosol loading over a cluster of mesoscale North Atlantic eddies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4075–4081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl059738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014gl059738</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Levin, Z., Teller, A., Ganor, E., and Yin, Y.: On the interactions of mineral dust, sea-salt particles, and clouds: A measurement and modeling study from the Mediterranean Israeli Dust Experiment campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D20202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD005810</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, E. and Schwartz, S.: Sea Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms, Methods, Measurements and Models – A Critical Review, Washington DC American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series, 152, 3719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GM152</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Carlson, B. E., Yung, Y. L., Lv, D., Hansen, J., Penner, J. E., Liao, H., Ramaswamy, V., Kahn, R. A., Zhang, P., Dubovik, O., Ding, A., Lacis, A. A., Zhang, L., and Dong, Y.: Scattering and absorbing aerosols in the climate system, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 3, 363–379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Li, M., Zhang, Q., Kurokawa, J.-I., Woo, J.-H., He, K., Lu, Z., Ohara, T., Song, Y., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., Cheng, Y., Hong, C., Huo, H., Jiang, X., Kang, S., Liu, F., Su, H., and Zheng, B.: MIX: a mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 935–963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-935-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-935-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Li, S., Wang, K., Miao, H., Zhu, X., Liu, Y., Li, J., Wang, W., Zheng, X., Feng, J., and Wang, X.: Evaluation of surface wind speed over East Asia and the adjacent ocean in three reanalyses using satellite and in-situ observations, Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett., 18, 5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aosl.2024.100587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aosl.2024.100587</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Liang, B., Cai, M., Sun, Q., Zhou, S., and Zhao, J.: Source apportionment of marine atmospheric aerosols in northern South China Sea during summertime 2018, Environ. Pollut., 289, 117948, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117948</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Hu, M., Wu, Z., Niu, Y., and Zhu, T.: Marine aerosol size distributions in the springtime over China adjacent seas, Atmos. Environ., 41, 6784–6796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.045</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Penner, J. E., and Herzog, M.: Global modeling of aerosol dynamics: Model description, evaluation, and interactions between sulfate and nonsulfate aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D18206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005674</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Lo, A. K., Zhang, L., and Sievering, H.: The effect of humidity and state of water surfaces on deposition of aerosol particles onto a water surface, Atmos. Environ., 33, 4727–4737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00202-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00202-2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Long, M. S., Keene, W. C., Easter, R. C., Sander, R., Liu, X., Kerkweg, A., and Erickson, D.: Sensitivity of tropospheric chemical composition to halogen-radical chemistry using a fully coupled size-resolved multiphase chemistry–global climate system: halogen distributions, aerosol composition, and sensitivity of climate-relevant gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3397–3425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3397-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3397-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Lorenzo, G. R., Arellano, A. F., Cambaliza, M. O., Castro, C., Cruz, M. T., Di Girolamo, L., Gacal, G. F., Hilario, M. R. A., Lagrosas, N., Ong, H. J., Simpas, J. B., Uy, S. N., and Sorooshian, A.: An emerging aerosol climatology via remote sensing over Metro Manila, the Philippines, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10579–10608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10579-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-10579-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Ma, X., Jing, Z., Chang, P., Liu, X., Montuoro, R., Small, R. J., Bryan, F. O., Greatbatch, R. J., Brandt, P., Wu, D., Lin, X., and Wu, L.: Western boundary currents regulated by interaction between ocean eddies and the atmosphere, Nature, 535, 533–537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18640" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature18640</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Ma, Y., Zhang, X., Xin, J., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., Liu, Q., Wu, F., Wang, L., Lyu, Y., Wang, Q., and Ma, Y.: Mass and number concentration distribution of marine aerosol in the Western Pacific and the influence of continental transport, Environ. Pollut., 298, 118827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118827</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Mårtensson, E. M., Nilsson, E. D., de Leeuw, G., Cohen, L. H., and Hansson, H.-C.: Laboratory simulations and parameterization of the primary marine aerosol production, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002263" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002263</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Miguet, J., Rouyer, F., and Rio, E.: The Life of a Surface Bubble, Molecules, 26, 1317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/molecules26051317</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Stordal, F., Johnsrud, M., Ignatov, A., Mishchenko, M. I., Geogdzhayev, I. V., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J.-L., Goloub, P., Nakajima, T., Higurashi, A., Torres, O., and Holben, B.: Intercomparison of Satellite Retrieved Aerosol Optical Depth over the Ocean, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 499-513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;0499:IOSRAO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;0499:IOSRAO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Nascimento, J. P., Bela, M. M., Meller, B. B., Banducci, A. L., Rizzo, L. V., Vara-Vela, A. L., Barbosa, H. M. J., Gomes, H., Rafee, S. A. A., Franco, M. A., Carbone, S., Cirino, G. G., Souza, R. A. F., McKeen, S. A., and Artaxo, P.: Aerosols from anthropogenic and biogenic sources and their interactions – modeling aerosol formation, optical properties, and impacts over the central Amazon basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6755–6779, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6755-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6755-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, Q. T., Kjær, K. H., Kling, K. I., Boesen, T., and Bilde, M.: Impact of fatty acid coating on the CCN activity of sea salt particles, Tellus B: Chem. Phys. Meteorol., 69, 1304064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1304064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/16000889.2017.1304064</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D. and de Leeuw, G.: Marine aerosol production: a review of the current knowledge, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A., 365, 1753–1774, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2007.2043</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>O'Dowd, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Bahreini, R., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Hämeri, K., Pirjola, L., Kulmala, M., Jennings, S. G., and Hoffmann, T.: Marine aerosol formation from biogenic iodine emissions, Nature, 417, 632–636, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature00775</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Ohata, S., Moteki, N., Mori, T., Koike, M., and Kondo, Y.: A key process controlling the wet removal of aerosols: new observational evidence, Sci. Rep., 6, 34113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep34113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>O'Neill, L. W., Chelton, D. B., and Esbensen, S. K.: The effects of SST-induced surface wind speed and direction gradients on midlatitude surface vorticity and divergence, J. Climate, 23, 255–281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2613.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JCLI2613.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Ovadnevaite, J., Manders, A., de Leeuw, G., Ceburnis, D., Monahan, C., Partanen, A.-I., Korhonen, H., and O'Dowd, C. D.: A sea spray aerosol flux parameterization encapsulating wave state, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1837–1852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1837-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1837-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Pagels, J., Gudmundsson, A., Gustavsson, E., Asking, L., and Bohgard, M.: Evaluation of aerodynamic particle sizer and electrical low-pressure impactor for unimodal and bimodal mass-weighted size distributions, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 871–887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500295677" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500295677</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Pant, V., Deshpande, C. G., and Kamra, A. K.: The concentration and number size distribution measurements of the Marine Boundary Layer aerosols over the Indian Ocean, Atmos. Res., 92, 381–393, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.12.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.12.004</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Peters, T. M.: Use of the aerodynamic particle sizer to measure ambient PM<sub>10–2.5</sub>: The coarse fraction of PM<sub>10</sub>, J. Air Waste Manage., 56, 411–416, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10473289.2006.10464522</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Peters, T. M. and Leith, D.: Concentration measurement and counting efficiency of the aerodynamic particle sizer 3321, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 627–634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00030-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00030-2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Pfeifer, S., Müller, T., Weinhold, K., Zikova, N., Martins dos Santos, S., Marinoni, A., Bischof, O. F., Kykal, C., Ries, L., Meinhardt, F., Aalto, P., Mihalopoulos, N., and Wiedensohler, A.: Intercomparison of 15 aerodynamic particle size spectrometers (APS 3321): uncertainties in particle sizing and number size distribution, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1545–1551, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Pietsch, R. B., Grothe, H., Hanlon, R., Powers, C. W., Jung, S., Ross, S. D., and Schmale Iii, D. G.: Wind-driven spume droplet production and the transport of Pseudomonas syringae from aquatic environments, PeerJ, 6, e5663, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5663" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7717/peerj.5663</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Prospero, J. M.: Mineral and sea salt aerosol concentrations in various ocean regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 84, 725–731, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC084iC02p00725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC084iC02p00725</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Provençal, S., Buchard, V., da Silva, A. M., Leduc, R., and Barrette, N.: Evaluation of PM surface concentrations simulated by Version 1 of NASA's MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis over Europe, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 8, 374–382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.10.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2016.10.009</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Provençal, S., Buchard, V., da Silva, A. M., Leduc, R., Barrette, N., Elhacham, E., and Wang, S. H.: Evaluation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Surface Concentrations Simulated by Version 1 of NASA's MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis over Israel and Taiwan, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 17, 253–261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.04.0145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2016.04.0145</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Qureshi, A., MacLeod, M., and Hungerbühler, K.: Modeling aerosol suspension from soils and oceans as sources of micropollutants to air, Chemosphere, 77, 495–500, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.051</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Radke, L. F., Hobbs, P. V., and Eltgroth, M. W.: Scavenging of Aerosol Particles by Precipitation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 19, 715–722, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1980)019&lt;0715:SOAPBP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1980)019&lt;0715:SOAPBP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Randles, C. A., da Silva, A. M., Buchard, V., Colarco, P. R., Darmenov, A., Govindaraju, R., Smirnov, A., Holben, B., Ferrare, R., Hair, J., Shinozuka, Y., and Flynn, C. J.: The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 Onward. Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation, J. Climate, 30, 6823–6850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Huebert, B. J., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Characterization of submicron aerosol size distributions from time-resolved measurements in the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment Marine Aerosol and Gas Exchange, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 4469–4478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD01372</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Russell, L. M., Moore, R. H., Burrows, S. M., and Quinn, P. K.: Ocean flux of salt, sulfate, and organic components to atmospheric aerosol, Earth-Sci. Rev., 239, 104364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2023.104364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2023.104364</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Saha, S., Sharma, S., Chhabra, A., Kumar, K. N., Kumar., P., Kamat, D., and Lal, S.: Impact of dust storm on the atmospheric boundary layer: a case study from western India, Nat. Hazards, 113, 143–155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05293-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-022-05293-z</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Sakerin, S. M., Bobrikov, A. A., Bukin, O. A., Golobokova, L. P., Pol'kin, Vas. V., Pol'kin, Vik. V., Shmirko, K. A., Kabanov, D. M., Khodzher, T. V., Onischuk, N. A., Pavlov, A. N., Potemkin, V. L., and Radionov, V. F.: On measurements of aerosol-gas composition of the atmosphere during two expeditions in 2013 along the Northern Sea Route, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12413–12443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12413-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12413-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Saliba, G., Chen, C.-L., Lewis, S., Russell, L. M., Rivellini, L.-H., Lee, A. K. Y., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Haëntjens, N., Boss, E. S., Karp-Boss, L., Baetge, N., Carlson, C. A., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Factors driving the seasonal and hourly variability of sea-spray aerosol number in the North Atlantic, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 20309–20314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907574116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1907574116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Saliba, G., Chen, C., Lewis, S., Russell, L. M., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Bell, T. G., Lawler, M. J., Saltzman, E. S., Sanchez, K. J., Moore, R., Shook, M., Rivellini, L., Lee, A., Baetge, N., Carlson, C. A., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Seasonal Differences and Variability of Concentrations, Chemical Composition, and Cloud Condensation Nuclei of Marine Aerosol Over the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD033145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033145</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Salter, M. E., Nilsson, E. D., Butcher, A., and Bilde, M.: On the seawater temperature dependence of the sea spray aerosol generated by a continuous plunging jet, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9052–9072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021376" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021376</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Sander, R., Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Arimoto, R., Ayers, G. P., Baboukas, E., Cainey, J. M., Crutzen, P. J., Duce, R. A., Hönninger, G., Huebert, B. J., Maenhaut, W., Mihalopoulos, N., Turekian, V. C., and Van Dingenen, R.: Inorganic bromine in the marine boundary layer: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1301–1336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1301-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-1301-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Savoie, D. L., Prospero, J. M., Larsen, R. J., Huang, F., Izaguirre, M. A., Huang, T., Snowdon, T. H., Custals, L., and Sanderson, C. G.: Nitrogen and sulfur species in Antarctic aerosols at Mawson, Palmer Station, and Marsh (King George Island), J. Atmos. Chem., 17, 95–122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00702821" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00702821</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Sellegri, K., O'Dowd, C. D., Yoon, Y. J., Jennings, S. G., and de Leeuw, G.: Surfactants and submicron sea spray generation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D22215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006658</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Sellegri, K., Barthelmeß, T., Trueblood, J., Cristi, A., Freney, E., Rose, C., Barr, N., Harvey, M., Safi, K., Deppeler, S., Thompson, K., Dillon, W., Engel, A., and Law, C.: Quantified effect of seawater biogeochemistry on the temperature dependence of sea spray aerosol fluxes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 12949–12964, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12949-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-12949-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Smith, M. H., Park, P. M., and Consterdine, I. E.: Marine aerosol concentrations and estimated fluxes over the sea, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 119, 809–824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711951211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49711951211</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely, R. R., Vernier, J.-P., Dutton, E. G., and Thomason, L. W.: The persistently variable “background” stratospheric aerosol layer and global climate change, Science, 333, 866–870, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1206027</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Song, A., Li, J., Tsona, N. T., and Du, L.: Parameterizations for sea spray aerosol production flux, Appl. Geochem., 157, 105776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105776" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105776</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Su, Y., Han, Y., Luo, H., Zhang, Y., Shao, S., and Xie, X.: Physical-optical properties of marine aerosols over the South China Sea: shipboard measurements and MERRA-2 reanalysis, Remote Sens., 14, 2453, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs14102453</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Textor, C., Schulz, M., Guibert, S., Kinne, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, H., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Horowitz, L., Huang, P., Isaksen, I., Iversen, I., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kirkevåg, A., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Liu, X., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, Ø., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1777–1813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Troitskaya, Y., Kandaurov, A., Ermakova, O., Kozlov, D., Sergeev, D., and Zilitinkevich, S.: The “bag breakup” spume droplet generation mechanism at high winds. Part I: Spray generation functionr, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 2167–2188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-17-0104.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jpo-d-17-0104.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>VanCuren, R. A.: Asian aerosols in North America: Extracting the chemical composition and mass concentration of the Asian continental aerosol plume from long-term aerosol records in the western United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4623, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003459" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003459</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of the performance of aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2-479-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Zheng, X., Dong, X., Xi, B., Wu, P., Logan, T., and Yung, Y. L.: Impacts of long-range transport of aerosols on marine-boundary-layer clouds in the eastern North Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14741–14755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14741-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-14741-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Woodcock, A. H.: Atmospheric seasalt particles and raindrops, J. Atmos. Sci., 9, 200–212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1952)009&lt;0200:ASPAR&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1952)009&lt;0200:ASPAR&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1952.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Woodcock, A. H.: Salt nuclei in marine air as a function of altitude and wind force, J. Atmos. Sci., 10, 362–371, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010&lt;0366:SNIMAA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010&lt;0366:SNIMAA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1953.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Woods, E., Chung, D., Lanney, H. M., and Ashwell, B. A.: Surface morphology and phase transitions in mixed Nacl/MgSO4 aerosol particles, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 2837–2844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp911133j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp911133j</ext-link>, 2010. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Wu, T. and Boor, B. E.: Urban aerosol size distributions: a global perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8883–8914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8883-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-8883-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Liu, X., Gao, H., Yao, X., Zhang, D., Bi, L., Liu, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Yuan, Q., and Li, W.: Long-range transport of anthropogenic air pollutants into the marine air: insight into fine particle transport and chloride depletion on sea salts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17715–17726, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17715-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-17715-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Norris, S. J., Bell, T. G., and Brooks, I. M.: Sea spray fluxes from the southwest coast of the United Kingdom – dependence on wind speed and wave height, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15271–15284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15271-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-15271-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>Yuan, R., Zhang, X., Liu, H., Gui, Y., Shao, B., Tao, X., Wang, Y., Zhong, J., Li, Y., and Gao, Z.: Aerosol vertical mass flux measurements during heavy aerosol pollution episodes at a rural site and an urban site in the Beijing area of the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12857–12874, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12857-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-12857-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>Zábori, J., Matisāns, M., Krejci, R., Nilsson, E. D., and Ström, J.: Artificial primary marine aerosol production: a laboratory study with varying water temperature, salinity, and succinic acid concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10709–10724, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>Zábori, J., Krejci, R., Ekman, A. M. L., Mårtensson, E. M., Ström, J., de Leeuw, G., and Nilsson, E. D.: Wintertime Arctic Ocean sea water properties and primary marine aerosol concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10405–10421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, K., Wang, S., Lu, X., Chen, H., Wang, L., Chen, J., Yang, X., and Wang, X.: Production flux and chemical characteristics of spray aerosol generated from raindrop impact on seawater and soil, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032052, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD032052</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Marine aerosol distributions from shipborne observations over the South China Sea: diurnal variation characteristics and their controlling factors</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Li, Q. B., Yantosca, R. M.,
Savarino, J., Lee, C. C. W., and Thiemens, M. H.: Sulphate formation in
sea-salt aerosols: Constraints from oxygen isotopes, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, D1037, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005659" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005659</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andreae, M. O. and Crutzen, P. J.: Atmospheric aerosols: Biogeochemical
sources and role in atmospheric chemistry, Science, 276, 1052–1058,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5315.1052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5315.1052</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions.
part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev.,
89, 13–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andreas, E. L.: A new sea spray generation function for wind speeds up to 32&thinsp;m&thinsp;s<sup>−1</sup>, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 2175–2184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;2175:ANSSGF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;2175:ANSSGF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andreas, E. L.: Spray-mediated enthalpy flux to the atmosphere and salt flux
to the ocean in high winds, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40, 608–619,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4232.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4232.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andronache, C.: Estimated variability of below-cloud aerosol removal by rainfall for observed aerosol size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 131–143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-131-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-131-2003</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Athanasopoulou, E., Protonotariou, A., Papangelis, G., Tombrou, M.,
Mihalopoulos, N., and Gerasopoulos, E.: Long-range transport of Saharan dust
and chemical transformations over the Eastern Mediterranean, Atmos.
Environ., 140, 592–604, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.041</a>,
2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Atwood, S. A., Reid, J. S., Kreidenweis, S. M., Blake, D. R., Jonsson, H. H., Lagrosas, N. D., Xian, P., Reid, E. A., Sessions, W. R., and Simpas, J. B.: Size-resolved aerosol and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) properties in the remote marine South China Sea – Part 1: Observations and source classification, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1105–1123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1105-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1105-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arimoto, R. and Duce, R. A.: Dry deposition models and the air/sea exchange
of trace elements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 91, 2787–2792,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD091iD02p02787" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD091iD02p02787</a>, 1986.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Atlas, E. and Giam, C. S.: Ambient Concentration and Precipitation
Scavenging of Atmospheric Organic Pollutants, Water Air Soil Poll., 38,
19–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279583" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279583</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K., Faluvegi, G., Kelley, M., Lo, K. K.,
Miller, R. L., Nazarenko, L., Schmidt, G. A., and Wu, J. B.: Historical
(1850–2014) aerosol evolution and role on climate forcing using the GISS
ModelE2.1 contribution to CMIP6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12,
e2019MS001978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001978</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bird, J. C., de Ruiter, R., Courbin, L., and Stone, H. A.: Daughter bubble
cascades produced by folding of ruptured thin films, Nature, 465, 759–762,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09069</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blanchard, D. C. and Woodcock, A. H.: The production, concentration, and
vertical distribution of the sea-salt aerosol, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 338,
330–347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb17130.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb17130.x</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Braun, R. A., Aghdam, M. A., Bañaga, P. A., Betito, G., Cambaliza, M. O., Cruz, M. T., Lorenzo, G. R., MacDonald, A. B., Simpas, J. B., Stahl, C., and Sorooshian, A.: Long-range aerosol transport and impacts on size-resolved aerosol composition in Metro Manila, Philippines, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2387–2405, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2387-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2387-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bruch, W., Yohia, C., Tulet, P., Limoges, A., Sutherland, P., van Eijk, A.
M. J., Missamou, T., and Piazzola, J.: Atmospheric sea spray modeling in the
North-East Atlantic Ocean using tunnel-derived generation functions and the
SUMOS cruise data set, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD038330,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038330" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038330</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bzdek, B. R., Reid, J. P., and Cotterell, M. I.: Open questions on the
physical properties of aerosols, Comm. Chem., 3, 105,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-020-00342-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-020-00342-9</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, M., Liang, B., Sun, Q., Zhou, S., Chen, X., Yuan, B., Shao, M., Tan, H., and Zhao, J.: Effects of continental emissions on cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity in the northern South China Sea during summertime 2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9153–9167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9153-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9153-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carslaw, K. S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Rae, J. G. L., Woodward, S., and Kulmala, M.: A review of natural aerosol interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, S. P., Lu, C. H., McQueen, J., and Lee, P.: Application of satellite
observations in conjunction with aerosol reanalysis to characterize
long-range transport of African and Asian dust on air quality in the
contiguous U.S., Atmos. Environ., 187, 174–195,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.038</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Christiansen, S., Salter, M. E., Gorokhova, E., Nguyen, Q. T., and Bilde,
M.: Sea spray aerosol formation: Laboratory results on the role of air
entrainment, water temperature, and phytoplankton biomass, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 53, 13107–13116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04078</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dasarathy, S., Russell, L. M., Rodier, S. D., and Bowman, J. S.: Wind-Driven
and Seasonal Effects on Marine Aerosol Production in the Bellingshausen Sea,
Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2022GL099723,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099723" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099723</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Rinaldi, M., Paglione, M., Fuzzi, S., Stephanou,
E. G., Tziaras, T., Spyros, A., Ceburnis, D., O'Dowd, C., Dall'Osto, M.,
Harrison, R. M., Allan, J., Coe, H., and Facchini, M. C.: Primary and
secondary marine aerosols over the North Atlantic Ocean during the MAP
experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116,
D22210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016204" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016204</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dedrick, J. L., Saliba, G., Williams, A. S., Russell, L. M., and Lubin, D.: Retrieval of the sea spray aerosol mode from submicron particle size distributions and supermicron scattering during LASIC, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4171–4194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4171-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4171-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, J., Dai, Q., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Huangfu, Y., and Feng, Y.: Air
humidity affects secondary aerosol formation in different pathways, Sci.
Total Environ., 759, 143540,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143540</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duce, R. A., Winchester, J. W., and Van Nahl, T. W.: Iodine, bromine, and
chlorine in the Hawaiian marine atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 70,
1775–1799, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i008p01775" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i008p01775</a>, 1965.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eriksson, E.: The yearly circulation of chloride and sulfur in nature:
Meteorological, geochemical and pedological implications. Part II, Tellus,
12, 63–109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1960.tb01284.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1960.tb01284.x</a>, 1960.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feingold, G., Cotton, W. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Davis, J. T.: Impact of
giant cloud condensation nuclei on drizzle formation in marine
stratocumulus: Implications for cloud radiative properties, J. Atmos. Sci.,
56, 4100–4117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;4100:TIOGCC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;4100:TIOGCC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Flores, J., Bourdin, G., Altaratz, O., Trainic, M., Lang-Yona, N., Dzimban,
E., Steinau, S., Tettich, F., Planes, S., Allemand, D., Agostini, S.,
Banaigs, B., Boissin, E., Boss, E., Douville, E., Forcioli, D., Furla, P.,
Galand, P. E., Sullivan, M. B., Gilson, É., Lombard, F., Moulin, C.,
Pesant, S., Poulain, J., Reynaud, S., Romac, S., Sunagawa, S., Thomas, O.
P., Troublé, R., de Vargas, C., Vega Thurber, R., Voolstra, C. R.,
Wincker, P., Zoccola, D., Bowler, C., Gorsky, G., Rudich, Y., Vardi, A., and
Koren, I.: Tara Pacific Expedition's Atmospheric Measurements of Marine
Aerosols across the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans: Overview and Preliminary
Results, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, 536–554,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0224.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0224.1</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Flores, J. M., Bourdin, G., Kostinski, A. B., Altaratz, O., Dagan, G.,
Lombard, F., Haëntjens, N., Boss, E., Sullivan, M. B., Gorsky, G.,
Lang-Yona, N., Trainic, M., Romac, S., Voolstra, C. R., Rudich, Y., Vardi,
A., and Koren, I.: Diel cycle of sea spray aerosol concentration, Nat.
Commun., 12, 5476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25579-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25579-3</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Forestieri, S. D., Moore, K. A., Martinez Borrero, R., Wang, A., Stokes, M.
D., and Cappa, C. D.: Temperature and Composition Dependence of Sea Spray
Aerosol Production, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 7218-7225,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078193</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan,
K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A.,
da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G. K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D.,
Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M.,
Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The modern-era retrospective
analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30,
5419–5454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Geng, X., Haig, J., Lin, B., Tian, C., Zhu, S., Cheng, Z., Yuan, Y., Zhang,
Y., Liu, J., Zheng, M., Li, J., Zhong, G., Zhao, S., Bird, M. I., and Zhang, G.:
Provenance of Aerosol Black Carbon over Northeast Indian Ocean and South
China Sea and Implications for Oceanic Black Carbon Cycling, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 57, 13067–13078, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03481" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03481</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gong, S. L.: A parameterization of sea-salt aerosol source function for sub-
and super-micron particles, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17,
1097, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gb002079</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Croft, B., Martin, R. V., Moore, R. H., Ziemba, L. D., Crosbie, E. C., Liu, H., Russell, L. M., Saliba, G., Wisthaler, A., Müller, M., Schiller, A., Galí, M., Chang, R. Y.-W., McDuffie, E. E., Bilsback, K. R., and Pierce, J. R.: Factors controlling marine aerosol size distributions and their climate effects over the northwest Atlantic Ocean region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1889–1916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1889-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1889-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, S., Cai, Z., Liu, J., Zhang, M., Chen, J., and Lin, Y.: Comparison on
aerosol physicochemical properties of sea and land along the coast of Bohai,
China, Sci. Total Environ., 673, 148–156,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.040</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hodshire, A. L., Akherati, A., Alvarado, M. J., Brown-Steiner, B., Jathar,
S. H., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., Lonsdale, C. R., Onasch, T. B.,
Ortega, A. M., and Pierce, J. R.: Aging Effects on Biomass Burning Aerosol
Mass and Composition: A Critical Review of Field and Laboratory Studies,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 10007–10022,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02588" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02588</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoppel, W. A.: Measurement of the size distribution and CCN supersaturation
spectrum of submicron aerosols over the ocean, J. Atmos. Sci., 36,
2006–2015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036&lt;2006:MOTSDA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036&lt;2006:MOTSDA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoppel, W. A., Fitzgerald, J. W., and Larson, R. E.: Aerosol size
distributions in air masses advecting off the east coast of the United
States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 90, 2365–2379,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD090iD01p02365" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD090iD01p02365</a>, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B., and Lin, J.-T.: Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and remote sensing observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3137–3157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiang, B., Xie, Z., Lam, P. K. S., He, P., Yue, F., Wang, L., Huang, Y.,
Kang, H., Yu, X., and Wu, X.: Spatial and temporal distribution of sea salt
aerosol mass concentrations in the marine boundary layer from the Arctic to
the Antarctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033892,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033892</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jing, Z., Chang, P., Shan, X., Wang, S., Wu, L., and Kurian, J.: Mesoscale
SST dynamics in the Kuroshio–Oyashio extension region, J. Phys. Oceanogr.,
49, 1339–1352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0159.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0159.1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Joung, Y. S. and Buie, C. R.: Aerosol generation by raindrop impact on
soil, Nat. Commun., 6, 6083, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7083" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7083</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keene, W. C., Long, M. S., Reid, J. S., Frossard, A. A., Kieber, D. J.,
Maben, J. R., Russell, L. M., Kinsey, J. D., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T. S.:
Factors that modulate properties of primary marine aerosol generated from
ambient seawater on ships at sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11961–11990,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026872" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026872</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kettle, A. J. and Andreae, M. O.: Flux of dimethylsulfide from the oceans:
A comparison of updated data sets and flux models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 26793–26808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900252" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900252</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, J. H., Yum, S. S., Lee, Y.-G., and Choi, B.-C.: Ship measurements of
submicron aerosol size distributions over the Yellow Sea and the East China
Sea, Atmos. Res., 93, 700–714,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.02.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.02.011</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kong, Y. W., Sheng, L. F., Liu, Q., and Li, X. Z.: Impact of marine
atmospheric process on aerosol number size distribution in the South China
Sea, Environ. Sci., 37, 2443–2452, 2016 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Korhonen, H., Carslaw, K. S., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., and Woodhouse,
M. T.: Influence of oceanic dimethyl sulfide emissions on cloud condensation
nuclei concentrations and seasonality over the remote Southern Hemisphere
oceans: a global model study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D15204,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009718" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009718</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lawler, M. J., Sander, R., Carpenter, L. J., Lee, J. D., von Glasow, R., Sommariva, R., and Saltzman, E. S.: HOCl and Cl2 observations in marine air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7617–7628, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7617-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7617-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leck, C. and Persson, C.: Seasonal and short-term variability in dimethyl
sulfide, sulfur dioxide and biogenic sulfur and sea salt aerosol particles
in the arctic marine boundary layer during summer and autumn, Tellus B, 48,
272–299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v48i2.15891" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v48i2.15891</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lehahn, Y., Koren, I., Rudich, Y., Bidle, K. D., Trainic, M., Flores, J. M.,
Sharoni, S., and Vardi, A.: Decoupling atmospheric and oceanic factors
affecting aerosol loading over a cluster of mesoscale North Atlantic eddies,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4075–4081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl059738" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl059738</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Levin, Z., Teller, A., Ganor, E., and Yin, Y.: On the interactions of
mineral dust, sea-salt particles, and clouds: A measurement and modeling
study from the Mediterranean Israeli Dust Experiment campaign, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, D20202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005810" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005810</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lewis, E. and Schwartz, S.: Sea Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms,
Methods, Measurements and Models – A Critical Review, Washington DC American
Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series, 152, 3719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GM152</a>,
2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Carlson, B. E., Yung, Y. L., Lv, D., Hansen, J., Penner, J. E.,
Liao, H., Ramaswamy, V., Kahn, R. A., Zhang, P., Dubovik, O., Ding, A.,
Lacis, A. A., Zhang, L., and Dong, Y.: Scattering and absorbing aerosols in
the climate system, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 3, 363–379,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, M., Zhang, Q., Kurokawa, J.-I., Woo, J.-H., He, K., Lu, Z., Ohara, T., Song, Y., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., Cheng, Y., Hong, C., Huo, H., Jiang, X., Kang, S., Liu, F., Su, H., and Zheng, B.: MIX: a mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 935–963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-935-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-935-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, S., Wang, K., Miao, H., Zhu, X., Liu, Y., Li, J., Wang, W., Zheng, X.,
Feng, J., and Wang, X.: Evaluation of surface wind speed over East Asia and
the adjacent ocean in three reanalyses using satellite and in-situ
observations, Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett., 18, 5,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aosl.2024.100587" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aosl.2024.100587</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liang, B., Cai, M., Sun, Q., Zhou, S., and Zhao, J.: Source apportionment of
marine atmospheric aerosols in northern South China Sea during summertime
2018, Environ. Pollut., 289, 117948,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117948</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, P., Hu, M., Wu, Z., Niu, Y., and Zhu, T.: Marine aerosol size
distributions in the springtime over China adjacent seas, Atmos. Environ.,
41, 6784–6796, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.045</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Penner, J. E., and Herzog, M.: Global modeling of aerosol dynamics:
Model description, evaluation, and interactions between sulfate and
nonsulfate aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D18206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005674" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005674</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lo, A. K., Zhang, L., and Sievering, H.: The effect of humidity and state of
water surfaces on deposition of aerosol particles onto a water
surface, Atmos.
Environ., 33, 4727–4737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00202-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00202-2</a>,
1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Long, M. S., Keene, W. C., Easter, R. C., Sander, R., Liu, X., Kerkweg, A., and Erickson, D.: Sensitivity of tropospheric chemical composition to halogen-radical chemistry using a fully coupled size-resolved multiphase chemistry–global climate system: halogen distributions, aerosol composition, and sensitivity of climate-relevant gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3397–3425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3397-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3397-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lorenzo, G. R., Arellano, A. F., Cambaliza, M. O., Castro, C., Cruz, M. T., Di Girolamo, L., Gacal, G. F., Hilario, M. R. A., Lagrosas, N., Ong, H. J., Simpas, J. B., Uy, S. N., and Sorooshian, A.: An emerging aerosol climatology via remote sensing over Metro Manila, the Philippines, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10579–10608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10579-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10579-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, X., Jing, Z., Chang, P., Liu, X., Montuoro, R., Small, R. J., Bryan, F.
O., Greatbatch, R. J., Brandt, P., Wu, D., Lin, X., and Wu, L.: Western
boundary currents regulated by interaction between ocean eddies and the
atmosphere, Nature, 535, 533–537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18640" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18640</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, Y., Zhang, X., Xin, J., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., Liu, Q., Wu, F., Wang, L.,
Lyu, Y., Wang, Q., and Ma, Y.: Mass and number concentration distribution of
marine aerosol in the Western Pacific and the influence of continental
transport, Environ. Pollut., 298, 118827,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118827</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mårtensson, E. M., Nilsson, E. D., de Leeuw, G., Cohen, L. H., and
Hansson, H.-C.: Laboratory simulations and parameterization of the primary
marine aerosol production, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002263" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002263</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miguet, J., Rouyer, F., and Rio, E.: The Life of a Surface Bubble,
Molecules, 26, 1317, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051317" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051317</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myhre, G., Stordal, F., Johnsrud, M., Ignatov, A., Mishchenko, M. I.,
Geogdzhayev, I. V., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J.-L., Goloub, P., Nakajima,
T., Higurashi, A., Torres, O., and Holben, B.: Intercomparison of Satellite
Retrieved Aerosol Optical Depth over the Ocean, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 499-513,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;0499:IOSRAO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;0499:IOSRAO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nascimento, J. P., Bela, M. M., Meller, B. B., Banducci, A. L., Rizzo, L. V., Vara-Vela, A. L., Barbosa, H. M. J., Gomes, H., Rafee, S. A. A., Franco, M. A., Carbone, S., Cirino, G. G., Souza, R. A. F., McKeen, S. A., and Artaxo, P.: Aerosols from anthropogenic and biogenic sources and their interactions – modeling aerosol formation, optical properties, and impacts over the central Amazon basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6755–6779, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6755-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6755-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nguyen, Q. T., Kjær, K. H., Kling, K. I., Boesen, T., and Bilde, M.:
Impact of fatty acid coating on the CCN activity of sea salt particles,
Tellus B: Chem. Phys. Meteorol., 69, 1304064,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1304064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1304064</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Dowd, C. D. and de Leeuw, G.: Marine aerosol production: a review of the
current knowledge, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A., 365, 1753–1774,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2043</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Dowd, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Bahreini, R., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H.,
Hämeri, K., Pirjola, L., Kulmala, M., Jennings, S. G., and Hoffmann, T.:
Marine aerosol formation from biogenic iodine emissions, Nature, 417,
632–636, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00775" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00775</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ohata, S., Moteki, N., Mori, T., Koike, M., and Kondo, Y.: A key process
controlling the wet removal of aerosols: new observational evidence, Sci.
Rep., 6, 34113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Neill, L. W., Chelton, D. B., and Esbensen, S. K.: The effects of
SST-induced surface wind speed and direction gradients on midlatitude
surface vorticity and divergence, J. Climate, 23, 255–281,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2613.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2613.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ovadnevaite, J., Manders, A., de Leeuw, G., Ceburnis, D., Monahan, C., Partanen, A.-I., Korhonen, H., and O'Dowd, C. D.: A sea spray aerosol flux parameterization encapsulating wave state, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1837–1852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1837-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1837-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pagels, J., Gudmundsson, A., Gustavsson, E., Asking, L., and Bohgard, M.:
Evaluation of aerodynamic particle sizer and electrical low-pressure
impactor for unimodal and bimodal mass-weighted size distributions, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 39, 871–887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500295677" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500295677</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pant, V., Deshpande, C. G., and Kamra, A. K.: The concentration and number
size distribution measurements of the Marine Boundary Layer aerosols over
the Indian Ocean, Atmos. Res., 92, 381–393,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.12.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.12.004</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peters, T. M.: Use of the aerodynamic particle sizer to measure ambient
PM<sub>10–2.5</sub>: The coarse fraction of PM<sub>10</sub>, J. Air Waste Manage., 56,
411–416, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464522" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464522</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peters, T. M. and Leith, D.: Concentration measurement and counting
efficiency of the aerodynamic particle sizer 3321, J. Aerosol Sci., 34,
627–634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00030-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00030-2</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pfeifer, S., Müller, T., Weinhold, K., Zikova, N., Martins dos Santos, S., Marinoni, A., Bischof, O. F., Kykal, C., Ries, L., Meinhardt, F., Aalto, P., Mihalopoulos, N., and Wiedensohler, A.: Intercomparison of 15 aerodynamic particle size spectrometers (APS 3321): uncertainties in particle sizing and number size distribution, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1545–1551, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pietsch, R. B., Grothe, H., Hanlon, R., Powers, C. W., Jung, S., Ross, S.
D., and Schmale Iii, D. G.: Wind-driven spume droplet production and the
transport of Pseudomonas syringae from aquatic environments, PeerJ, 6,
e5663, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5663" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5663</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prospero, J. M.: Mineral and sea salt aerosol concentrations in various
ocean regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 84, 725–731,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC084iC02p00725" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC084iC02p00725</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Provençal, S., Buchard, V., da Silva, A. M., Leduc, R., and Barrette,
N.: Evaluation of PM surface concentrations simulated by Version 1 of NASA's
MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis over Europe, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 8, 374–382,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.10.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.10.009</a>, 2017a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Provençal, S., Buchard, V., da Silva, A. M., Leduc, R., Barrette, N.,
Elhacham, E., and Wang, S. H.: Evaluation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Surface Concentrations
Simulated by Version 1 of NASA's MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis over Israel and
Taiwan, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 17, 253–261,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.04.0145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.04.0145</a>, 2017b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Qureshi, A., MacLeod, M., and Hungerbühler, K.: Modeling aerosol
suspension from soils and oceans as sources of micropollutants to air,
Chemosphere, 77, 495–500,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.051</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Radke, L. F., Hobbs, P. V., and Eltgroth, M. W.: Scavenging of Aerosol
Particles by Precipitation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 19, 715–722,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1980)019&lt;0715:SOAPBP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1980)019&lt;0715:SOAPBP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Randles, C. A., da Silva, A. M., Buchard, V., Colarco, P. R., Darmenov, A.,
Govindaraju, R., Smirnov, A., Holben, B., Ferrare, R., Hair, J., Shinozuka,
Y., and Flynn, C. J.: The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 Onward. Part I:
System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation, J. Climate, 30,
6823–6850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Russell, L. M., Huebert, B. J., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Characterization of submicron aerosol size distributions from time-resolved
measurements in the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment Marine
Aerosol and Gas Exchange, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 4469–4478,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01372</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Russell, L. M., Moore, R. H., Burrows, S. M., and Quinn, P. K.: Ocean flux
of salt, sulfate, and organic components to atmospheric aerosol, Earth-Sci.
Rev., 239, 104364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2023.104364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2023.104364</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saha, S., Sharma, S., Chhabra, A., Kumar, K. N., Kumar., P., Kamat, D., and Lal,
S.: Impact of dust storm on the atmospheric boundary layer: a case study
from western India, Nat. Hazards, 113, 143–155,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05293-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05293-z</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sakerin, S. M., Bobrikov, A. A., Bukin, O. A., Golobokova, L. P., Pol'kin, Vas. V., Pol'kin, Vik. V., Shmirko, K. A., Kabanov, D. M., Khodzher, T. V., Onischuk, N. A., Pavlov, A. N., Potemkin, V. L., and Radionov, V. F.: On measurements of aerosol-gas composition of the atmosphere during two expeditions in 2013 along the Northern Sea Route, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12413–12443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12413-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12413-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saliba, G., Chen, C.-L., Lewis, S., Russell, L. M., Rivellini, L.-H., Lee,
A. K. Y., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Haëntjens, N., Boss, E. S.,
Karp-Boss, L., Baetge, N., Carlson, C. A., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Factors
driving the seasonal and hourly variability of sea-spray aerosol number in
the North Atlantic, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 20309–20314,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907574116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907574116</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saliba, G., Chen, C., Lewis, S., Russell, L. M., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S.,
Bell, T. G., Lawler, M. J., Saltzman, E. S., Sanchez, K. J., Moore, R.,
Shook, M., Rivellini, L., Lee, A., Baetge, N., Carlson, C. A., and
Behrenfeld, M. J.: Seasonal Differences and Variability of Concentrations,
Chemical Composition, and Cloud Condensation Nuclei of Marine Aerosol Over
the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD033145,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033145</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
      
Salter, M. E., Nilsson, E. D., Butcher, A., and Bilde, M.: On the seawater
temperature dependence of the sea spray aerosol generated by a continuous
plunging jet, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9052–9072,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021376" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021376</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sander, R., Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Arimoto, R., Ayers, G. P., Baboukas, E., Cainey, J. M., Crutzen, P. J., Duce, R. A., Hönninger, G., Huebert, B. J., Maenhaut, W., Mihalopoulos, N., Turekian, V. C., and Van Dingenen, R.: Inorganic bromine in the marine boundary layer: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1301–1336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1301-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1301-2003</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
      
Savoie, D. L., Prospero, J. M., Larsen, R. J., Huang, F., Izaguirre, M. A.,
Huang, T., Snowdon, T. H., Custals, L., and Sanderson, C. G.: Nitrogen and
sulfur species in Antarctic aerosols at Mawson, Palmer Station, and Marsh
(King George Island), J. Atmos. Chem., 17, 95–122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00702821" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00702821</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sellegri, K., O'Dowd, C. D., Yoon, Y. J., Jennings, S. G., and de Leeuw, G.:
Surfactants and submicron sea spray generation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
111, D22215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006658" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006658</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sellegri, K., Barthelmeß, T., Trueblood, J., Cristi, A., Freney, E., Rose, C., Barr, N., Harvey, M., Safi, K., Deppeler, S., Thompson, K., Dillon, W., Engel, A., and Law, C.: Quantified effect of seawater biogeochemistry on the temperature dependence of sea spray aerosol fluxes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 12949–12964, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12949-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12949-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, M. H., Park, P. M., and Consterdine, I. E.: Marine aerosol
concentrations and estimated fluxes over the sea, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 119, 809–824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711951211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711951211</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
      
Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely, R. R., Vernier, J.-P., Dutton, E. G., and
Thomason, L. W.: The persistently variable “background” stratospheric
aerosol layer and global climate change, Science, 333, 866–870,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, A., Li, J., Tsona, N. T., and Du, L.: Parameterizations for sea spray
aerosol production flux, Appl. Geochem., 157, 105776,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105776" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105776</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, Y., Han, Y., Luo, H., Zhang, Y., Shao, S., and Xie, X.: Physical-optical
properties of marine aerosols over the South China Sea: shipboard
measurements and MERRA-2 reanalysis, Remote Sens., 14, 2453,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102453</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
      
Textor, C., Schulz, M., Guibert, S., Kinne, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, H., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Horowitz, L., Huang, P., Isaksen, I., Iversen, I., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kirkevåg, A., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Liu, X., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, Ø., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1777–1813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
      
Troitskaya, Y., Kandaurov, A., Ermakova, O., Kozlov, D., Sergeev, D., and
Zilitinkevich, S.: The “bag breakup” spume droplet generation mechanism at
high winds. Part I: Spray generation functionr, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48,
2167–2188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-17-0104.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-17-0104.1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
      
VanCuren, R. A.: Asian aerosols in North America: Extracting the chemical
composition and mass concentration of the Asian continental aerosol plume
from long-term aerosol records in the western United States, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 108, 4623, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003459" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003459</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
      
von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of the performance of aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Zheng, X., Dong, X., Xi, B., Wu, P., Logan, T., and Yung, Y. L.: Impacts of long-range transport of aerosols on marine-boundary-layer clouds in the eastern North Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14741–14755, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14741-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14741-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woodcock, A. H.: Atmospheric seasalt particles and raindrops, J. Atmos.
Sci., 9, 200–212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1952)009&lt;0200:ASPAR&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1952)009&lt;0200:ASPAR&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1952.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woodcock, A. H.: Salt nuclei in marine air as a function of altitude and
wind force, J. Atmos. Sci., 10, 362–371,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010&lt;0366:SNIMAA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1953)010&lt;0366:SNIMAA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1953.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woods, E., Chung, D., Lanney, H. M., and Ashwell, B. A.: Surface morphology
and phase transitions in mixed Nacl/MgSO4 aerosol particles, J. Phys. Chem.
A, 114, 2837–2844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp911133j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp911133j</a>, 2010.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, T. and Boor, B. E.: Urban aerosol size distributions: a global perspective, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8883–8914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8883-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8883-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, L., Liu, X., Gao, H., Yao, X., Zhang, D., Bi, L., Liu, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Yuan, Q., and Li, W.: Long-range transport of anthropogenic air pollutants into the marine air: insight into fine particle transport and chloride depletion on sea salts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17715–17726, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17715-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17715-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, M., Norris, S. J., Bell, T. G., and Brooks, I. M.: Sea spray fluxes from the southwest coast of the United Kingdom – dependence on wind speed and wave height, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15271–15284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15271-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15271-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yuan, R., Zhang, X., Liu, H., Gui, Y., Shao, B., Tao, X., Wang, Y., Zhong, J., Li, Y., and Gao, Z.: Aerosol vertical mass flux measurements during heavy aerosol pollution episodes at a rural site and an urban site in the Beijing area of the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12857–12874, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12857-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12857-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zábori, J., Matisāns, M., Krejci, R., Nilsson, E. D., and Ström, J.: Artificial primary marine aerosol production: a laboratory study with varying water temperature, salinity, and succinic acid concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10709–10724, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10709-2012</a>, 2012a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zábori, J., Krejci, R., Ekman, A. M. L., Mårtensson, E. M., Ström, J., de Leeuw, G., and Nilsson, E. D.: Wintertime Arctic Ocean sea water properties and primary marine aerosol concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10405–10421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10405-2012</a>, 2012b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, K., Wang, S., Lu, X., Chen, H., Wang, L., Chen, J., Yang, X., and
Wang, X.: Production flux and chemical characteristics of spray aerosol
generated from raindrop impact on seawater and soil, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032052, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032052</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
