<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-25-15819-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Speciated measurement of bicyclic peroxy  radicals via iodide-CIMS and its implication on OH-initiated aromatic oxidation</article-title><alt-title>Speciated measurement of bicyclic peroxy radicals via iodide-CIMS</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Yi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name>
          <email>li_xin@pku.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2322-4069</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Ying</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-0211</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Shuyu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qiu</surname><given-names>Yuqing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Mengdi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>Jiarong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Lou</surname><given-names>Shengrong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Sihua</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Limin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yuanhang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability,   College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, P.R. China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology,   Nanjing University of Information Science &amp; Technology, Nanjing, 210044, P.R. China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Formation and Prevention of Urban Air Pollution Complex, Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shanghai, 200233, P.R. China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Xin Li (li_xin@pku.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>15819</fpage><lpage>15834</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Yi Liu et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e192">Bicyclic peroxy radicals (BPRs) from aromatics hydrocarbons oxidation play increasingly recognized roles in the formation of secondary air pollutants. However, their reaction mechanisms remain poorly constrained, largely due to the lack of direct measurement techniques. In this study, we developed a method for quantitative measurement of BPRs using an iodide chemical ionization mass spectrometer (Vocus AIM). Following instrument optimization, the sensitivity for BPRs reached 0.3–0.6 ncps pptv<sup>−1</sup>, with a detection limit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 pptv and an uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41 %. Our flow reactor experiments revealed that the bicyclic pathway dominates the OH-initiated oxidation of aromatics under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions, accounting for 57.0 % and 69.5 % of the oxidation products of toluene and m-xylene, respectively. Comparative analysis further demonstrated that conventional product-yield-based approaches underestimate the branching ratio of the bicyclic pathway by 4 %–9 % relative to direct BPR quantification. This discrepancy suggests the presence of unaccounted reaction channels in current chemical mechanisms, even when autoxidation and accretion reactions are considered. By directly quantifying BPRs, this study provides new insights into the atmospheric oxidation of aromatics and highlights the need for further mechanistic investigation. Moreover, the reaction-pathway-controlled quantification approach proposed here effectively reduces the challenges associated with measuring functionalized RO<sub>2</sub> radicals and demonstrates strong potential for sensitive, speciated RO<sub>2</sub> detection using Vocus AIM in both laboratory and ambient environments.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2022YFC3700201</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality</funding-source>
<award-id>JQ21030</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e258">Organic peroxy radicals (RO<sub>2</sub>), which are derived from the secondary transformations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), are pivotal intermediates in oxygen-rich atmospheric systems (Pai et al., 2020; Whalley et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2016). As central branching points in complex networks of unimolecular and bimolecular reactions, RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, especially functionalized RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, which typically contain oxygenated functional groups, govern key atmospheric processes such as ozone formation, hydroxyl (OH) radical recycling, and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) production (Barber and Kroll, 2021; Orlando and Tyndall, 2012). But degradation mechanism of these functionalized RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, predominantly formed from biogenic hydrocarbons (such as isoprene, monoterpenes) and anthropogenic hydrocarbons (such as aromatics) as well as their impact on radical cycles, ozone and SOA formation are not well understood (Orlando and Tyndall, 2012; Hofzumahaus et al., 2009; Riipinen et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2024a) due to the lack of direct detection techniques.</p>
      <p id="d2e297">Taking aromatic hydrocarbons as an example, the current understanding of aromatic oxidation remains insufficient (Wu et al., 2020, 2014; Zaytsev et al., 2019; Ji et al., 2017), although they are abundant in urban atmospheres and account significantly for 20 %–55 % of ozone formation (Wu and Xie, 2017; Li et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2020) and approximately 70 % of SOA generation (Zhang et al., 2021; Cui et al., 2022) in China. There are notable uncertainties regarding the branching ratios of individual pathways, especially for the dominate peroxide-bicyclic pathway (He et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2020). Given the lack of direct measurements of the primary radicals, bicyclic peroxy radicals (BPRs, shown in Schemes S1 and S2 in the Supplement), formed in the bicyclic pathway, the branching ratio of this pathway is typically inferred from the combined yields of tracer products associated with it (He et al., 2023). However, previous laboratory studies using the product-yield method have revealed significant variability in the estimated branching ratio of the bicyclic pathway and an unresolved carbon mass balance (Arey et al., 2009; Gomez Alvarez et al., 2007; He et al., 2023; Tuazon et al., 1986; Zaytsev et al., 2019), partly owing to difficulties in product identification and variations in measurement accuracy. Recent theoretical and experimental investigations suggest that the contribution from BPRs autoxidation (RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> QOOH) (Iyer et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2018; Garmash et al., 2020) and bimolecular reaction of RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<sub>2</sub> to form accretion products (ROOR<sup>′</sup>) (Berndt et al., 2018a; Wang et al., 2024b) may have been previously underestimated. Nevertheless, the rate constants and branching ratios of these newly proposed reactions have yet to be experimentally validated. Therefore, the development of direct measurement techniques for individual RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, particularly functionalized RO<sub>2</sub> species, remains critically important.</p>
      <p id="d2e369">Chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) has recently been reported as a promising technique for the molecular-level detection of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals (Berndt et al., 2015; Hansel et al., 2018; Nozière and Hanson, 2017). However, such measurements remain constrained by high detection limits and are typically conducted under laboratory conditions with elevated concentrations of precursors and oxidants far exceeding those in ambient, to generate detectable levels of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals. Besides, owing to the unavailability of authentic standards, most studies only provide only qualitative analyses or estimate RO<sub>2</sub> sensitivities based on other compounds (Hansel et al., 2018; Zaytsev et al., 2021; Berndt et al., 2015, 2019; Wang et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018; Berndt et al., 2018a), introducing substantial uncertainties. Although recent efforts have employed NO titration to quantify unfunctionalized RO<sub>2</sub> in flow tubes (Nozière and Hanson, 2017), such as CH<sub>3</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and CH<sub>3</sub>C(O)O<sub>2</sub>, extending this method to functionalized RO<sub>2</sub> like BPRs remains challenging. The reaction between BPRs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO is more complex and follows distinct pathways (Schemes S1, S2), necessitating further investigation.</p>
      <p id="d2e489">In this study, we focus on BPRs formed the OH-initiation oxidation of toluene and m-xylene, aiming to establish their qualitative identification and quantitative calibration. Considering BPRs' structural characteristics – such as the presence of hydroxyl groups, moderate-to-low volatility, and a total of five oxygen atoms – iodide (I<sup>−</sup>) was selected as the reagent ion due to its high sensitivity toward hydroxy-containing compounds (Song et al., 2024; Lee et al., 2014). Moreover, fragmentation is minimal during iodide adduct formation, as the process slightly exoergic (Lee et al., 2014), which reduces the loss of reactive RO<sub>2</sub> radicals during ionization.</p>
      <p id="d2e511">Here, we present the recently developed CIMS equipped with an AIM (Adduct Ionization Mechanism) ion-molecule reactor (Tofwerk AG, hereafter referred to as Vocus AIM), which has demonstrated enhanced sensitivity toward trace reactive oxygenated gaseous species (Riva et al., 2024; Aggarwal et al., 2025). In this work, the key instrumental parameters influencing the sensitivity to BPRs were systematically identified and optimized. A calibration system based on a flow reactor was then established to generate pure and stable concentrations of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals through the OH-initiated oxidation of toluene and m-xylene. The corresponding mass spectral signals were clearly resolved, and potential interferences from nitrogen-containing species and isotopic overlaps were carefully examined. Furthermore, we successfully quantified the instrumental sensitivities toward BPRs by selectively controlling the reaction pathways and assessed the associated uncertainties of the measurement method. Building upon this direct quantification approach, we further investigated the product yields and mechanism in aromatic oxidation, offering new experimental insights into the peroxide–bicyclic pathway.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Instrumentation and optimization</title>
      <p id="d2e538">Vocus AIM supports various reagent ions of both positive and negative polarity and we chose I<sup>−</sup> as reagent ions to detect RO<sub>2</sub> radicals here. As Fig. 1 shows, Iodine reagent ions (I<sup>−</sup>) were generated by passing a 250 sccm (standard cubic centimeter per minute) ultra-high purity nitrogen stream, carrying trace amounts of methyl iodide and benzene (released from a permeation tube held at 80 °C), through a vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) source connected to IMR. A 2.2 slpm (standard liters per minute) sample flow was introduced into the IMR and intermingled with the I<sup>−</sup> reagent ion flow to produce molecular-ions. Then ions were guided into the Vocus, big segmented quadrupole (BSQ), primary beam (PB) chamber and ToF analyser. The instrument can achieve a mass resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 000 at 100–500 Th and a total ion count of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 000 000 cps.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e594">A schematic of the High-Resolution Time-of-flight Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer with AIM reactor.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e603">Considering the low sensitivity and substantial potential loss of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, we optimized the Vocus AIM to increase the sensitivity for BPRs detection. As summarized in previous literature (Lee et al., 2014; Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2016), for adduct ionization, the sensitivity toward a certain species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is influenced by two main factors: the formation rate of product ions, governed by collision frequency and the available energy in the reactor, and the transmission efficiency of these product ions to the detector, which can be illustrated by Eq. (1),

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">product</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ion</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">formation</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">transmission</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sensitivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the product ion formation rate constant, [I<sup>−</sup>] is the concentration of the reagent ions in IMR, and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] is the ion-specific transmission efficiency. The number of collisions and available energy primarily depends on temperature and pressure conditions in the IMR, while the transmission efficiency depends upon <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, net electric field strength of the transfer optics, and the adduct ion binding energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2016). Thus, we mainly examined three key factors, IMR pressure, IMR temperature, and TPS voltages, to achieve optimal performance for BPRs detection.</p>
      <p id="d2e771">As RO<sub>2</sub> radicals are unstable for direct sensitivity optimization, the standards of oxidation products from aromatic hydrocarbons, which has similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl group), were selected to serve as proxies for BPRs. These aromatics oxidation products included 2,4-dihydroxytoluene (C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), 4-nitrophenol (C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>) and 2-methyl-6-nitrophenol (C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>7</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>). Additionally, formic acid (CH<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) and pinonic acid (C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>16</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, one oxidation product of monoterpenes) were incorporated into the optimization process to expand the analytical scope. To further demonstrate the effectiveness of our optimization strategy for detecting RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, we compared ionization efficiency (Isaacman-VanWertz et al., 2018) and sensitivities of the optimized Vocus AIM system with those of the conventional I<sup>−</sup>-CIMS (He et al., 2024, 2023) (Aerodyne Research Inc.). Further details on this older instrument are provided in Sect. S2 in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>BPRs calibration: system setup and quantitative method</title>
      <p id="d2e950">A schematic of the calibration system is shown in the upper of Fig. 2. The main flow tube was 60 cm in length and constructed with 3 cm inner diameter quartz tube. An 8 slpm zero air carrier gas ([NO]: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ppbv) was introduced at the inlet to ensure laminar flow conditions (Reynolds number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for most experiments). Aromatic precursors (1–30 ppbv) were introduced via calibrated mass flow controllers and thoroughly mixed in the front section of the reactor. The reactor was maintained at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 °C and 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % relative humidity. Primary OH radicals were generated by photolyzing H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O under 185 nm UV irradiation in the middle of the tube, yielding OH concentrations of 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>10</sup> to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>10</sup> molec. cm<sup>−3</sup> (estimated from precursor decay). The subsequent reaction between OH and the aromatic compounds led to the formation of BPRs in the rear part of the tube, with a typical residence time of 3–4 s.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1059">A schematic of the Experimental systems setup.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1068">In addition to Vocus AIM mentioned above, the flow tube was surrounded by Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry (PTR-MS), monitoring precursors and other gas-phase products. HO<sub>2</sub> radicals were also measured using Vocus AIM. Recent literature has discussed the measurement of HO<sub>2</sub> radicals using Br<sup>−</sup>-CIMS (Wang et al., 2024a). Since I<sup>−</sup> and Br<sup>−</sup> have similar chemical properties, Vocus AIM can theoretically also measure HO<sub>2</sub> radicals and we calibrated the Vocus AIM using a HO<sub>2</sub> standard generator and validated the calibration through comparison with laser-induced fluorescence (Fig. S5 in the Supplement). NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, RH, and temperature were also monitored during the experiments.</p>
      <p id="d2e1145">The key of the calibration is to determine the concentration of BPRs generated in the reactor and here we proposed a method based on reaction kinetics to experimentally constrain it. The formation pathway of BPR mainly results from the reaction between the precursor and OH radicals, with multiple unimolecular and bimolecular reactions involved. Accordingly, the RO<sub>2</sub> concentration within the reactor can be expressed using Eq. (2),

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M89" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">source</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sinks</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>] and [RO<sub>2</sub>] represent the concentrations of the precursor and RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">source</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sinks</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the total formation and removal rate constants of RO<sub>2</sub>, respectively. As illustrated in Schemes S1, S2, the OH-initiation oxidation of aromatics involves multiple pathways like bicyclic pathway, phenolic pathway and benzaldehyde pathway, and BPRs are the primarily radicals of bicyclic pathway. Consequently, it is imperative to ascertain the branching ratio of the bicyclic pathway, designated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M97" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">source</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where [OH] represents the concentration of OH radicals, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rate coefficients for the reactions between aromatics and OH. The branching ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which quantifies the peroxide-bicyclic pathway, can be quantified using the summation of the formation yields of specific tracers (He et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2020) based on measurements from Vocus AIM and Vocus PTR (more details in Sect. 2.4).</p>
      <p id="d2e1330">In contrast, the sinks of RO<sub>2</sub> are highly complex, including physical removal (e.g., wall loss), bimolecular reactions with NO, HO<sub>2</sub>, and RO<sub>2</sub>, as well as unimolecular reactions, gas-particle partitioning and other potentially unidentified pathways. Quantifying all these processes undoubtedly represents a substantial endeavour. Therefore, experiments were conducted under controlled conditions using zero air ([NO] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ppbv) to minimize NO-related reactions, as the reactions between BPRs and NO involve complex mechanisms with both ring-retaining and ring-opening pathways that complicate the interpretation of product distributions. However, previous studies have shown that BPRs can still undergo ring-opening reactions even under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions, indicating that reactions with NO remain a non-negligible sink for BPRs (Song et al., 2021; He et al., 2023). Besides, hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) was introduced to regulate the subsequent chemistry of BPRs. Photolysis of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> provided an additional OH source, thereby promoting BPRs formation. Simultaneously, the presence of excess H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> facilitated the conversion of OH to HO<sub>2</sub>, yielding HO<sub>2</sub> concentrations on the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>11</sup> molec. cm<sup>−3</sup> in most experiments. Under these conditions, the BPRs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<sub>2</sub> reaction pathway was expected to dominate. Recent studies have reported rate constants for self- and cross-reactions of BPRs approaching the collision limit (Berndt et al., 2018b), indicating that these processes can represent an important sink for BPRs. Other potential sinks were not included here, since under the high HO<sub>2</sub> conditions of our experiments, unimolecular reactions are not competitive with bimolecular reactions. In addition, previous studies have shown that SOA formation from early-generation aromatic products remains very low (less than 1 %) without seed aerosol (He et al., 2023). Consequently, the primary loss processes of BPRs in this study were considered to be physical removal, and bimolecular reactions with NO, HO<sub>2</sub>, and RO<sub>2</sub>,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M121" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sinks</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where [NO],  [HO<sub>2</sub>] and [RO<sub>2</sub>] represent the concentrations of NO, HO<sub>2</sub> and RO<sub>2</sub>, respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the bimolecular reaction rate coefficients for RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO, RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<sub>2</sub> and RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<sub>2</sub>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wall loss rate constant in the flow tube. These reaction rate coefficients of RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO and RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HO<sub>2</sub> were taken from the MCM website (<uri>https://mcm.york.ac.uk</uri>, last access: 10 October 2025), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−4</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, as described in the Sect. S4. As BPRs accounted for the majority of RO<sub>2</sub> in our system (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 86 % according to the box-model analysis in Sect. S4), their self-reaction represented the dominant RO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RO<sub>2</sub> pathway. We therefore adopted the self-reaction rate constants of trimethylbenzene-BPRs reported in recent studies and explicitly included this process in the quantification of BPRs (Berndt et al., 2018b).</p>
      <p id="d2e1932">The lifetime of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals under the high-HO<sub>2</sub> conditions was estimated to be approximately 0.4 s, nearly an order of magnitude shorter than the residence time in the flow reactor. Box-model results further show that the concentration of BPRs reached a steady state after about 3 s (Fig. S8). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the formation and removal of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals occurred rapidly (Eq. 5 and then obtain the concentration of BPRs generated in the reactor (Eq. 6),

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M155" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">source</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sinks</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2107">The calibration of BPRs was performed by introducing aromatics standards (1–30 ppbv) into the flow reactor to generate different concentrations of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals. The normalized RO<sub>2</sub> signal in Vocus AIM is expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sig</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (7), and the calibration coefficient (sensitivity) for RO<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sen</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is shown in Eq. (8), 

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M161" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sig</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sig</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sig</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sig</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sen</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sig</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Detection limits were determined based on the signal-to-noise ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as given in Eq. (9),

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M163" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detection</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">limit</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sen</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard deviation of the background noise. Table S1 in the Supplement presents the design and reaction conditions of the calibration experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Oxidation flow reactor setup and experimental design</title>
      <p id="d2e2346">A series of photooxidation experiments of toluene and m-xylene were conducted under typical low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions in an oxidation flow reactor (OFR) to directly investigate the oxidation mechanisms of aromatic hydrocarbons. Unlike previous studies (He et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2020), which primarily inferred the fate of BPRs from the trace products, the present work directly quantified the concentrations and formation yields of BPRs, as well as the branching ratio of the bicyclic pathway, based on the calibrated method described above. The main sector of OFP, as illustrated in the lower part of Fig. 2, was a 100 cm long, 9.6 cm inner diameter made of quartz glass (Yu et al., 2022; Watne et al., 2018). The reactor was illuminated by two Philips TUV 30 W fluorescent lamps emitting at 185 nm, enclosed within an aluminium mirror compartment to minimize photon field inhomogeneities. Aromatic hydrocarbon precursors (1–30 ppbv), mixed with 7 slpm of humidified zero air, were introduced into the front of the reactor. Additionally, 3 slpm of zero air was used as sheath flow to reduce wall losses. The residence time within the reactor was maintained at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 s. OH radical concentrations were calibrated by monitoring the decay of precursors and typically ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<sup>−3</sup> during the oxidation experiments, with temperature and relative humidity kept at 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 °C and 45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %, respectively. More details about the oxidation experiments have been listed in Table 1.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2425">Oxidation Flow Reactor: experimental conditions of aromatic-RO<sub>2</sub> oxidation experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Expt No.<sup>*</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reactants</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Temperature [°C]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Relative Humidity [%]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OH<sub>av</sub> [molec. cm<sup>−3</sup>]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 ppbv TOL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>9</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 ppbv TOL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>9</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18 ppbv TOL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>9</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 ppbv TOL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>9</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 ppbv TOL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>9</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2 ppbv m-XYL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>9</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4 ppbv m-XYL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>9</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 ppbv m-XYL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>9</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8 ppbv m-XYL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>8</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 ppbv m-XYL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>8</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e2437"><sup>*</sup> These experiments were conducted under essentially fixed low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 ppbv) conditions to investigate the mechanism under varying NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor ratio by changing the precursor concentration.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Calculation of product yields and reaction branching ratios</title>
      <p id="d2e3019">The product yield was defined as the amount of product formed per unit of the precursor consumed (Galloway et al., 2011). In this study, the yield of a product <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was defined as follows (Xu et al., 2020),

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M221" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corrected</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corrected</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> formed before and after correction for secondary loss, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the reacted amount of toluene or m-xylene. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the correction factor for secondary loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be calculated by Eq. (11) (Xu et al., 2020),

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M228" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rate coefficients for precursor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the effective loss rate of product <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For relatively stable oxidation products (primarily distinct from RO<sub>2</sub> radicals), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mainly combines the reaction with OH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and wall loss (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M237" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e3434">For RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, the sink of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals' physical loss processes (e.g., wall loss, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the bimolecular reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were considered as the main sink of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals in this work,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M245" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">loss</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wall</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were directly taken from the MCM website. As for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it was estimated using the approach suggested by Zhang et al (2015), which is based on flow tube parameters and the physicochemical properties of the products (details in Sect. S3). Besides, the issues concerning tracer product identification, yields of isomer-mixed products and other related problems are thoroughly addressed in our previous studies (He et al., 2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e3692">Building upon the quantified product yields, the branching ratio of a specific reaction pathway was estimated by summing the yields of tracer products uniquely associated with that pathway,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M249" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Branching</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ratio</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The reaction pathways investigated in this study, along with their corresponding tracer products, are summarized in Schemes S1 and S2.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>CIMS Optimization</title>
      <p id="d2e3737">As a next-generation chemical ionization mass spectrometer developed by Tofwerk, Vocus AIM introduced two major advancements over traditional I<sup>−</sup>-CIMS instruments. First, it utilized VUV lamps in place of X-ray source for ionization (Ji et al., 2020; Riva et al., 2024), leading to an approximately two orders of magnitude increase in total ion signal (Sect. S2). Second, the redesigned IMR (Aggarwal et al., 2025; Riva et al., 2024) achieved a 200 % improvement in molecular-ion reaction efficiency, as confirmed by our calibration results (Table S3). Together, these enhancements enable the Vocus AIM to substantially surpass previous CIMS instruments in its ability to detect species with lower sensitivity, like RO<sub>2</sub> radicals (Riva et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e3758">As BPRs are short-lived and not available as authentic standards, we selected several moderately to low volatile compounds as proxies that bracket BPRs in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl groups), and iodide-adduct binding energies to evaluate experimental conditions, including IMR pressure, IMR temperature, and TPS voltages. It should be noted that the sensitivities under the chosen settings differed by only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %–30 % from the individual proxy optima (Fig. S10), and we consider this proxy-based optimization approach to be effective and reliable for BPRs. The details about these standards and BPRs, including binding energies with the reagent ions and volatilities, are provided in the Table 2. For each optimization, we varied one factor at a time while keeping the others constant.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3783">Summary of binding energies with I<sup>−</sup> and volatilities of BPRs and standard compounds.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dipole moment<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Polarizability<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Iodide Adducts' Binding Energy<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Saturation Vapor Concentration<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[Debye]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[Å]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tol-BPRs<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.068</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">101.387</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>4</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xyl-BPRs<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.346</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">113.663</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>4</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CH<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.521</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.296</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>9</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.451</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">99.301</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>7</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>NO<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.438</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">94.177</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>6</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>7</sub>NO<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.738</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">107.636</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>6</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>16</sub>O<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.322</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">126.071</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>5</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e3795"><sup>a</sup> Estimated by quantum chemical calculations via ORCA version 5.0.4 (more details in Sect. S1). <sup>b</sup> Estimated by the group-contribution method (Nannoolal et al., 2009). <sup>c</sup> Represent the BPRs derived from the oxidation of toluene and m-xylene, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4383">Figure 3a illustrates the impact of IMR pressure on sensitivities of representative analytes. A noticeable increase in all standards' sensitivities was observed as the IMR pressure rose from 40 to 70 mbar. In addition to contributing to the collision frequency, the higher absolute pressure likely enhanced the flow into the next differentially pumped region, which in turn increased the concentration of product ions in the detector. However, pressure cannot be increased indefinitely, as excessively high pressures place additional strain on the vacuum system and may compromise the stability of the mass spectrometer. Consequently, a conservative operating pressure of 70 mbar was selected for the IMR in all subsequent experiments.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4388">The optimization results: the dependence of instrument sensitivities of representative standards on the instrumental conditions, <bold>(a)</bold> IMR pressure, <bold>(b)</bold> IMR temperature, <bold>(c)</bold> voltage of skimmer in the BSQ and <bold>(d)</bold> the comparison of sensitivities in optimized Vocus AIM and traditional I<sup>−</sup>-CIMS.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4418">Figure 3b illustrates the dependence of sensitivity on IMR temperature across various species. The effect of temperature on sensitivity can be explained from two perspectives. On one hand, higher temperatures promoted the volatilization of low-volatility species, thereby increasing the gas-phase concentration of analytes and enhancing sensitivity, as shown by the trends for nitrophenols and pinonic acid which have relative lower volatility. On the other hand, higher temperatures favoured the reverse direction of ion-molecule reaction equilibrium, which reduces sensitivity because the process is exothermic. This negative effect of temperature was more pronounced for adducts with a lower binding energy, as demonstrated by the trends for formic acid and dihydroxytoluene. Given their comparable binding energy with I<sup>−</sup> and similarly lower volatility, BPRs were expected to exhibit temperature-dependent behaviour similar to that of nitrophenols. Thus, we selected 45 °C as the optimal reaction temperature to balance sensitivity enhancement and minimize potential loss of BPRs.</p>
      <p id="d2e4430">TPS voltages play a critical role in the sensitivities by influencing the transmission of product ions from the reactor to the detector. Particular attention was given to the voltage between the skimmer1 and the front of BSQ (as outlined in Fig. 1), since declustering and activation of product ions should be minimized in the initial stages of the ion optics interface (Aggarwal et al., 2025). Figure 3c shows the signal response as the voltage between the skimmer and BSQ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">skimmer</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was scanned in 1 V increments. As anticipated, excessive field strengths led to ion fragmentation, while insufficient voltages increased the ion residence time, resulting in higher potential loss. We also manually tuned the other voltages, identifying the voltage configuration that maximized the sensitivity of selected specie.</p>
      <p id="d2e4443">Figure 3d demonstrates markedly enhanced sensitivities for representative standards in the optimized Vocus AIM system compared to the traditional I<sup>−</sup>-CIMS equipped with an X-Ray ionizer. This improvement highlights the superior capability of the Vocus AIM in detecting trace-level and low-sensitivity species, underscoring its potential for accurate measurement of the BPRs targeted in this study.</p>
      <p id="d2e4456">These standards can be classified into five categories: acids (mono- and di-carboxylic acids), phenols/alcohols (mono-, di-, and poly-substituted), carbonyl-acids, hydroxyl-acids, and nitrophenols. These compounds collectively cover the mass-to-charge (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) range of primary oxidation products from aromatic hydrocarbons and exhibit similar structural features or physicochemical properties to the target products. For compounds lacking authentic standards, an empirical approach based on half of the iodide adducts dissociate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), was developed for Vocus AIM to extrapolate the instrumental sensitivities according to our previous studies (He et al., 2024) (Sect. S1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>BPRs Identification in Mass Spectra</title>
      <p id="d2e4496">To evaluate the optimized detection capability of Vocus AIM for RO<sub>2</sub> radicals, we introduced toluene and m-xylene at different concentrations, using zero air with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 % relative humidity as the carrier gas, into the calibration flow tube. The raw data were processed using the Tofware package v3.2.3 (Tofwerk AG), which includes baseline correction, peak shape and width refinement, mass calibration and high-resolution peak fitting. RO<sub>2</sub> radicals were identified as iodide adducts of the general formula C<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>H<sub>2<italic>y</italic>+1</sub>O<sub><italic>z</italic></sub>I<sup>−</sup>, characterized by an odd number of hydrogen atoms.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4570">Peak fitting result for BPRs in the oxidation of <bold>(a)</bold> toluene, <bold>(d)</bold> m-xylene with H<sub>2</sub>O photolysis the sole source of OH, correlation analysis of BPRs, precursors and products <bold>(b, e)</bold> and improvement in the peak fitting after adding H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <bold>(c, f)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4619">The high-resolution peak fitting effectively distinguished different isobars that appeared at the same unit mass, as shown in Fig. 4a and d. We attributed the observed C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>9</sub>O<sub>5</sub>I<sup>−</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 299.95 Th) and C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>11</sub>O<sub>5</sub>I<sup>−</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 313.97 Th) signals to BPRs from toluene and m-xylene, respectively. In addition to BPRs peaks (marked in yellow lines), peaks from the nitrogen-containing substances (blue lines) and isotope peaks (green lines) at the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were identified. Furthermore, the ring-retaining products of BPRs as shown in Schemes S1, S2, were also assigned by Vocus AIM, including bicyclic alcohols, bicyclic carbonyls and bicyclic hydroperoxides, which were assigned as C<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>H<sub>2<italic>x</italic>−6</sub>O<sub>4</sub>I<sup>−</sup>, C<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>H<sub>2<italic>x</italic>−4</sub>O<sub>4</sub>I<sup>−</sup> and C<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>H<sub>2<italic>x</italic>−4</sub>O<sub>5</sub>I<sup>−</sup>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 for toluene and 8 for m-xylene. Strong correlations between BPR signals and their precursors and oxidation products (Fig. 4b, e) confirm that Vocus AIM could correctly detect BPRs under the optimized conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e4893">It is worth noting that the contributions of BPRs to the total peak intensity were less than 60 % and interference from nitrogen-containing substances and isotopic peaks cannot be overlooked, when H<sub>2</sub>O photolysis was the sole source of OH radicals, as shown in Fig. 4a, d. To address this issue, we introduced H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to increase the OH radical concentration to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>10</sup> molec. cm<sup>−3</sup> in the calibration experiments, which in turn enhanced RO<sub>2</sub> production. As shown in Fig. 4c, f, this modification significantly increased the relative contribution of BPRs signals, with RO<sub>2</sub> peaks accounting for over 95 % of the total signal, which lowered the complexity of peak fitting, facilitating more accurate identification and analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Quantification and Sensitivities of BPRs measurement</title>
      <p id="d2e4978">Figure 5a, b shows the time series of the signal of BPRs, precursors, and bicyclic hydroperoxides (ROOH, generated from the reaction of RO<sub>2</sub> and HO<sub>2</sub>) during the calibration experiments. The signals of BPRs and ROOH exhibited distinct variations when the UV lamp was switched on or off, as well as with changes in the precursor concentrations. To accurately quantify the concentration of BPRs, several parameters must be determined, as described in Eq. (6). For example, the chemical reaction rates were based on the recommended values from the MCM, while the concentrations of the reactants were measured by the instruments, as detailed in the Methods Section. Among these, the most complex factors are wall loss rates of BPRs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the branching ratio of the peroxide-bicyclic pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The diffusion loss rates of BPRs onto the reactor wall were calculated to be 10<sup>−3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> using an empirical approach (Zhang et al., 2015) (detailed in Sect. S4). The branching ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated by summing the formation yields of specific tracer products linked to the peroxide-bicyclic pathway (Xu et al., 2020; He et al., 2023) and the tracer products associated with different pathways were depicted in Schemes S1, S2. In the peroxide-bicyclic pathway, the tracer products included ring-retaining and ring-opening products, primarily resulting from bimolecular reactions between BPRs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under HO<sub>2</sub>-dominant conditions.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e5075">Time series and mechanistic analysis of toluene and m-xylene calibration experiments: temporal profiles of tol-BPRs <bold>(a)</bold> and xyl-BPRs <bold>(d)</bold> with their precursor and products, experimental branching ratios for peroxide-bicyclic pathways in the oxidation of toluene <bold>(b)</bold> and m-xylene <bold>(e)</bold>, detection sensitivity of tol-BPRs <bold>(c)</bold> and xyl-BPRs <bold>(f)</bold> measured by Vocus AIM.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5103">Figure 5c, d show the branching ratio estimated in this work. Taking the calibration of toluene-BPRs as an example, the early generation ring-retaining products, generated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BPRs</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions, included bicyclic alcohols, bicyclic carbonyls and bicyclic hydroperoxides, assigned as C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>10</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, respectively. The summed branching ratio of the ring-retaining products was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 51 %. While the ring-opening products of toluene oxidation, generated from BPRs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO reactions, can be categorized into two main groups of dicarbonyls: smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, such as glyoxal) and C<sub>4</sub>–C<sub>5</sub> unsaturated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls (such as butenedial (C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>4</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), methylbutenedial (C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>6</sub>O<sub>2</sub>)). Isomeric products of unsaturated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls (e.g., furanones), which act as supplemental coproducts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls in BPRs' decomposition in MCM, were also considered (for further details, refer to our previous work; He et al., 2023). The branching ratios of ring-opening pathway were calculated to be around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 %. By providing HO<sub>2</sub> at concentrations nearly comparable to those of the precursors and intentionally controlling NO concentrations, a high proportion of first-generation ring-retaining products was observed across a range of NO-to-precursor ratios, which was markedly higher than the recommended value of MCM under actual atmospheric conditions (less than 0.1) (Xu et al., 2020; He et al., 2023). Besides, the stable branching ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 68 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 83 % for toluene and m-xylene, respectively) observed in Fig. 5c, d suggests that our method consistently generates RO<sub>2</sub> radicals at varying NO-to-precursor ratios.</p>
      <p id="d2e5386">Based on the measurement results and the previous discussion, we can utilize Eq. (6) to ascertain the concentrations of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals generated in the reactor under varying conditions. The resulting sensitivities, calculated using Eq. (8), are presented in Fig. 5e, f, with sensitivities of 0.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 and 0.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 ncps pptv<sup>−1</sup> for toluene-BPRs and m-xylene -BPRs, respectively, at a time resolution of 1 min. The detection limits for these RO<sub>2</sub> radicals were estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 pptv.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Uncertainty and Possible Interferences</title>
      <p id="d2e5449">As previously mentioned, the quantification of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals relies primarily on Eqs. (2)–(9), with several main sources of uncertainty: (1) uncertainty in the measurement of precursors, oxidants, HO<sub>2</sub>, and NO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), (2) uncertainty in flow tube loss, specifically related to the wall loss rate constants in the tube (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), (3) uncertainty in the branching ratio of the peroxide-bicyclic pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and (4) uncertainty for chemical reaction rate coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), reported from previous reports. Additionally, vapor deposition onto the sampling lines may contribute to these uncertainties (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Thus, the overall uncertainty can be expressed using Eq. (15),

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M407" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">overall</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          For the measurement of precursors and products using Vocus AIM and Vocus PTR in the first part, the primary source of uncertainty was sensitivity determination. For the calibrated compounds in this study, the uncertainty in measured sensitivities is relatively small, ranging from 5 % to 15 %. For uncalibrated compounds, sensitivity uncertainties are high, between 10 % and 35 %, primarily owing to uncertainties in the ion–molecule reaction rate constants, relative transmission efficiency, and fragmentation fraction (for details, see Sects. S1 and S2). The measurement errors for HO<sub>2</sub> and NO were referenced in the literature (Wang et al., 2024a) and specified in the official manuals, respectively. As the OH concentration is determined from the decay of its precursor, the uncertainty in OH concentration is derived based on the measurement uncertainty of the precursor.</p>
      <p id="d2e5592">The loss uncertainty in the flow tube primarily arises from physical processes. The uncertainty for physical loss was determined using the averaged deviation in deposition rate coefficients observed for structurally similar compounds, as explored by Zhang et al. (2015). The uncertainty for the branching ratio was determined based on measurement and loss uncertainties, with details provided in Tables S10 and S11. Sampling tests indicated that when using a short <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in. O.D. PFA line (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 m) at a flow rate of 10 L min<sup>−1</sup>, the RO<sub>2</sub> signal decreased by less than 1 %, making the wall loss in the sampling lines negligible (Fig. S6). The overall uncertainty for the sensitivities of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals was calculated from the propagation of the abovementioned uncertainties, as shown in Table 3.</p>
      <p id="d2e5644">Furthermore, we compared the calculation results of BPRs concentrations in our calibration system using the traditional product-yield method (Birdsall et al., 2010; Elrod, 2011) and direct-calculate method developed in this work. As illustrated in Fig. S7, the product-yield method systematically underestimates radical concentrations. This discrepancy originates from two primary limitations of yield-based method: (1) incomplete product quantification due to analytical or mechanistic constraints (e.g., undetected intermediates or other reactions), and (2) error amplification caused by the cumulative uncertainties when summing yields across multiple products. Consequently, the direct-calculate mothed provides improved accuracy for calibrating RO<sub>2</sub> radicals sensitivity in CIMS.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e5660">Contributions to the uncertainty of RO<sub>2</sub> sensitivities.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Uncertainty Source </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Toluene-RO<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">m-Xylene-RO<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">Uncertainty </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Measurement</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Precursor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HO<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8 %<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8 %<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wall loss</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15 %<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 %<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Branching ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25 %<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24 %<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reaction rates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Precursor</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 %<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 %<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Overall </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e5672"><sup>a</sup> Estimated based on the method from Wang et al. (2024a). <sup>b</sup> Estimated by the  approach from Zhang et al. (2015). <sup>c</sup> Details refer to Table S10, S11. <sup>d</sup> Refers to  evaluated literature data. <sup>d</sup> Refers to   evaluated literature data (Calvert and Calvert,   2002).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Mechanistic Analysis for Aromatics Oxidation Experiments</title>
      <p id="d2e6107">Previous experimental and theoretical studies have investigated the oxidation mechanism of aromatics (He et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2020; Calvert and Calvert, 2002; Barker et al., 2017). However, the carbon mass balance is not achieved using product-yield method and the origin of missing fraction remains controversial (Xu et al., 2020). Based on the new direct measurement method for RO<sub>2</sub> radicals in this work, we investigated the reaction mechanisms and product yields in the OH-initiated oxidation of toluene and m-xylene under typical low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> environments.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e6130">Experimental branching ratios for different pathways in the case of toluene and m-xylene, calculated by direct-measured method and product-yield method.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/15819/2025/acp-25-15819-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6139">Figure 6 presents the yields of first-generation oxidation products for toluene and m-xylene based on the traditional product-yield method (Ehn et al., 2014, 2012), quantified via I<sup>−</sup>-CIMS and PTR-MS under varying NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor ratios. The three dominant pathways, including benzaldehyde, phenolic and peroxide-bicyclic pathways, collectively accounted for 78 %–87 % (toluene) and 71 %–80 % (m-xylene) of the observed products. The yields of benzaldehyde and tolu aldehyde were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 % in toluene and m-xylene oxidation experiments, respectively, both of which were consistent with MCM recommended values and experimental results (He et al., 2023; Klotz et al., 1998; Atkinson et al., 1991; Smith et al., 1999; Zaytsev et al., 2019). The yield of cresol was determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21 %, which generally agreed with both the MCM recommended yield and most values reported in the literature (He et al., 2023; Klotz et al., 1998). However, the measured yield of xylenol was estimated at 6 %, which were roughly half of the MCM recommendation of 17 % but broadly in accordance with the result (8 %) obtained by He et al. (2023). It seems that the peroxide-bicyclic pathway exhibited significantly higher sensitivity to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> than the other two pathways, ranging from 45 % (59 %) to 56 % (71 %) in the case of toluene (m-xylene) oxidation. The combined yields of first-generation products from traditional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BPRs</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions, such as dicarbonyls, and furanones, showed a modest increase with increasing NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor in both toluene and m-xylene systems, which indicates that NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> plays a crucial role in determining the subsequent fate of BPRs. Notably, 13 %–29 % of the oxidation products remained unresolved by current product-yield method. To address carbon imbalance in aromatic oxidation systems, MCM incorporates an epoxide pathway (Schemes S1, S2), hypothesizing that epoxide intermediates formed via isomerization of peroxide-bicyclic alkyl radicals undergo ring cleavage to produce epoxydicarbonyls at a theoretical yield of 10 %–29 %, which appears to account for the observed missing fraction. However, experimental yields of epoxydicarbonyls (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %) revealed significant overprediction by MCM (Zaytsev et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d2e6225">Figure 6 also demonstrates the differences (filled with light grey) ranging from 4 % to 9 %, between the product-yield method and the direct measurement of BPRs method (outlined in red box). In addition, the divergence amplified under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions which indicates there were potential conversions of BPRs into unaccounted species. Recent studies have reported possible reaction mechanism, such as unimolecular fate of BPRs to generating highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs), at rates competitive with bimolecular reactions, especially under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions (Iyer et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2018, 2024b). However, yields of only 0.1 %–1.7 % were reported for aromatic-derived HOMs from BPRs experimentally by Molteni et al. (2018). In the latest flow tube experiments using NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-CIMS, the yield of HOMs from the BPRs' autoxidation estimated about 2 % in the oxidation of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (Wang et al., 2024b). While bimolecular reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BPRs</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form accretion products may also have contributions to the production of HOMs (Berndt et al., 2018a; Wang et al., 2024b), although the yields were estimated less than 0.1 % in the oxidation of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (Wang et al., 2024b). Therefore, additional quantitative experiments may be required to further understand the complex chemistry of BPRs and explaining the origin of the missing carbon balance.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e6282">The chemistry of functionalized RO<sub>2</sub> radicals plays a pivotal role to the lifecycle and ultimate impacts of atmospheric organic carbon. Developing new techniques to directly measure functionalized RO<sub>2</sub> radicals is therefore urgently needed to improve our understanding of key atmospheric chemical processes, such as radical cycling, ozone and SOA formation. In this study, we established I<sup>−</sup>-CIMS as an effective method for speciated detection of functionalized RO<sub>2</sub> radicals in aromatic oxidation systems and introduced a quantitative method for analysing BPRs derived from toluene and m-xylene. By introducing excess HO<sub>2</sub> radicals, this approach enhanced the dominance of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BPRs</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction pathway, enabling stable and linear BPRs production across various NO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> precursor conditions. Furthermore, the HO<sub>2</sub>-dominated system simplified the identification of BPRs and their oxidation products. This method achieved a detection limit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 pptv for BPRs, with an associated uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 41 %. It should be pointed that RO<sub>2</sub>-direct quantification method can effectively circumvent systematic uncertainties inherent in product-yield method, thereby providing more robust constraints on branching ratio determinations.</p>
      <p id="d2e6385">Further comparisons of the chemical distributions results of various pathways estimated by the product-yield method and direct-measured method developed in this work were conducted. Comparative analysis in the oxidation experiments revealed that the conventional products-yield method underestimated the branching ratio of the bicyclic pathway, particularly under low-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> conditions. This discrepancy suggests the existence of unaccounted reaction channels in current chemical mechanisms, such as autoxidation processes. Based on the direct measurement of BPRs, the other pathways of BPRs, which were not incorporated in current MCM, may account for approximately 4 %–9 % of the missing carbon flux during our oxidation experiments, as illustrated in Fig. 6. Recent advancements in the reaction mechanism, such as the autoxidation (Garmash et al., 2020; Molteni et al., 2018; Pichelstorfer et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024b; Iyer et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2018). and the accretion reaction (Iyer et al., 2023; Molteni et al., 2018) of BPRs, may help to achieve carbon closure. However, our findings reveal a significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 %) unaccounted pathway in BPRs fate, which contrasts with the small yields (less than 3 %) of HOMs reported in the previous literature (Wang et al., 2024b; Molteni et al., 2018). This discrepancy highlights the need for further investigations to improve the representation of BPRs chemistry.</p>
      <p id="d2e6404">In addition to their role in SOA formation through HOMs generation, the autoxidation of bicyclic peroxy radicals (BPRs) has emerged as a contributor to atmospheric OH recycle (Yang et al., 2024b; Iyer et al., 2023). Therefore, mechanistic investigations of aromatics, including laboratory experiments and filed observations, require heightened scientific attention. The Vocus AIM, with detection limit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 pptv for BPRs in this work, offers a promising tool for ambient RO<sub>2</sub> quantification and enables more accurate characterization of key radical pathways in the atmosphere. However, since aromatics are predominantly emitted from anthropogenic sources, environments with elevated aromatic concentrations, like urban areas, are usually accompanied by high NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> levels. This makes real atmospheric spectra considerably more complex, with stronger interferences from isotopes and nitrogen-containing species. Consequently, the direct measurement of RO<sub>2</sub> in the ambient atmosphere remains a significant challenge.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6446">The data used in this study are available upon request from Yi Liu (2101112167@stu.pku.edu.cn) and Xin Li (li_xin@pku.edu.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e6449">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15819-2025-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15819-2025-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e6458">YiL., X.L., and YingL. conceived and designed the study and critically revised the manuscript. S.H., Y.Q., M.S., and J.Y. contributed to discussions, instrument operation, and data analysis. S.L., L.Z., and Y.Z. provided technical support for the measurements and contributed valuable suggestions.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e6464">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e6470">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e6476">This study was supported by the National Key R&amp;D Program of China (grant no. 2022YFC3700201) and the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (grant no. JQ21030). We also thank for the technical support of the National Large Scientific and Technological Infrastructure “Earth System Numerical Simulation Facility” (<uri>https://cstr.cn/31134.02.EL</uri>, last access: 1 April 2024.).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e6484">This research has been supported by the National Key R&amp;D Program of China (grant no. 2022YFC3700201) and the the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (grant no. JQ21030).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e6490">This paper was edited by Dantong Liu and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aggarwal, S., Bansal, P., Wang, Y., Jorga, S., Macgregor, G., Rohner, U., Bannan, T., Salter, M., Zieger, P., Mohr, C., and Lopez-Hilfiker, F.: Identifying key parameters that affect sensitivity of flow tube chemical ionization mass spectrometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4227–4247, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4227-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-4227-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Arey, J., Obermeyer, G., Aschmann, S. M., Chattopadhyay, S., Cusick, R. D., and Atkinson, R.: Dicarbonyl Products of the OH Radical-Initiated Reaction of a Series of Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 683–689, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8019098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es8019098</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R., Aschmann, S. M., and Arey, J.: Formation of Ring-Retaining Products from the Oh Radical-Initated Reactions of Ortho-Xylene, Meta-Xylene, and Para-Xylene, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 23, 77–97, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550230108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/kin.550230108</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Barber, V. P. and Kroll, J. H.: Chemistry of Functionalized Reactive Organic Intermediates in the Earth's Atmosphere: Impact, Challenges, and Progress, J. Phys. Chem. A, 125, 10264–10279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c08221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.1c08221</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Barker, J. R., Steiner, A. L., and Wallington, T. J.: Advances in atmospheric chemistry, World Scientific, New Jersey, Vols. 1–2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/11031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/11031</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Berndt, T., Richters, S., Kaethner, R., Voigtländer, J., Stratmann, F., Sipilä, M., Kulmala, M., and Herrmann, H.: Gas-Phase Ozonolysis of Cycloalkenes: Formation of Highly Oxidized RO<sub>2</sub> Radicals and Their Reactions with NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and Other RO<sub>2</sub> Radicals, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 10336–10348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07295" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07295</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Berndt, T., Mender, B., Scholz, W., Fischer, L., Herrmann, H., Kulmala, M., and Hansel, A.: Accretion Product Formation from Ozonolysis and OH Radical Reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene: Mechanistic Insight and the Influence of Isoprene and Ethylene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 11069–11077, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b02210</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Berndt, T., Scholz, W., Mentler, B., Fischer, L., Herrmann, H., Kulmala, M., and Hansel, A.: Accretion Product Formation from Self- and Cross-Reactions of RO<sub>2</sub> Radicals in the Atmosphere, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 57, 3820–3824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201710989" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/anie.201710989</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Berndt, T., Hyttinen, N., Herrmann, H., and Hansel, A.: First oxidation products from the reaction of hydroxyl radicals with isoprene for pristine environmental conditions, Commun. Chem., 2,  21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-019-0120-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s42004-019-0120-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Birdsall, A. W., Andreoni, J. F., and Elrod, M. J.: Investigation of the Role of Bicyclic Peroxy Radicals in the Oxidation Mechanism of Toluene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 10655–10663, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp105467e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp105467e</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Calvert, J. G. and Calvert, J. G.: The mechanisms of atmospheric oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 556 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195146288.001.0001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/oso/9780195146288.001.0001</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cui, L., Wu, D., Wang, S., Xu, Q., Hu, R., and Hao, J.: Measurement report: Ambient volatile organic compound (VOC) pollution in urban Beijing: characteristics, sources, and implications for pollution control, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11931–11944, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11931-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-11931-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Kleist, E., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Lönn, G., Schobesberger, S., Dal Maso, M., Trimborn, A., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wahner, A., Wildt, J., and Mentel, Th. F.: Gas phase formation of extremely oxidized pinene reaction products in chamber and ambient air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5113–5127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5113-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5113-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurtén, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13032</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Elrod, M. J.: Kinetics Study of the Aromatic Bicyclic Peroxy Radical plus NO Reaction: Overall Rate Constant and Nitrate Product Yield Measurements, J. Phys. Chem. A, 115, 8125–8130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp204308f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp204308f</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Galloway, M. M., Huisman, A. J., Yee, L. D., Chan, A. W. H., Loza, C. L., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Yields of oxidized volatile organic compounds during the OH radical initiated oxidation of isoprene, methyl vinyl ketone, and methacrolein under high-NOx conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10779–10790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10779-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10779-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Garmash, O., Rissanen, M. P., Pullinen, I., Schmitt, S., Kausiala, O., Tillmann, R., Zhao, D., Percival, C., Bannan, T. J., Priestley, M., Hallquist, Å. M., Kleist, E., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Hallquist, M., Berndt, T., McFiggans, G., Wildt, J., Mentel, T. F., and Ehn, M.: Multi-generation OH oxidation as a source for highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 515–537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-515-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-515-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gomez Alvarez, E., Viidanoja, J., Muñoz, A., Wirtz, K., and Hjorth, J.: Experimental confirmation of the dicarbonyl route in the photo-oxidation of toluene and benzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8362–8369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0713274" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0713274</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hansel, A., Scholz, W., Mentler, B., Fischer, L., and Berndt, T.: Detection of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals and other products from cyclohexene ozonolysis with NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and acetate chemical ionization mass spectrometry, Atmos. Environ., 186, 248–255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.023</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>He, S. Y., Liu, Y., Song, M. D., Li, X., Lu, S. H., Chen, T. Z., Mu, Y. J., Lou, S. R., Shi, X. D., Qiu, X. H., Zhu, T., and Zhang, Y. H.: Insights into the Peroxide-Bicyclic Intermediate Pathway of Aromatic Photooxidation: Experimental Yields and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-Dependency of Ring-Opening and Ring-Retaining Products, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 20657–20668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.3c05304</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>He, S. Y., Liu, Y., Song, M. D., Li, X., Lou, S. R., Ye, C. S., Liu, Y. J., Liu, Y., Ye, J. R., Lu, S. H., Zhou, W. X., Qiu, X. H., Zhu, T., and Zeng, L. M.: Empirical Approach to Quantifying Sensitivity in Different Chemical Ionization Techniques for Organonitrates and Nitroaromatics Constrained by Ion-Molecule Reaction and Transmission Efficiency, Anal. Chem., 96, 16882–16890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c03751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.4c03751</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hofzumahaus, A., Rohrer, F., Lu, K. D., Bohn, B., Brauers, T., Chang, C. C., Fuchs, H., Holland, F., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., Li, X., Lou, S. R., Shao, M., Zeng, L. M., Wahner, A., and Zhang, Y. H.: Amplified Trace Gas Removal in the Troposphere, Science, 324, 1702–1704, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164566" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1164566</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Massoli, P., O'Brien, R., Lim, C., Franklin, J. P., Moss, J. A., Hunter, J. F., Nowak, J. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Misztal, P. K., Arata, C., Roscioli, J. R., Herndon, S. T., Onasch, T. B., Lambe, A. T., Jayne, J. T., Su, L. P., Knopf, D. A., Goldstein, A. H., Worsnop, D. R., and Kroll, J. H.: Chemical evolution of atmospheric organic carbon over multiple generations of oxidation, Nat. Chem., 10, 462–468, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0002-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41557-018-0002-2</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Iyer, S., Kumar, A., Savolainen, A., Barua, S., Daub, C., Pichelstorfer, L., Roldin, P., Garmash, O., Seal, P., Kurtén, T., and Rissanen, M.: Molecular rearrangement of bicyclic peroxy radicals is a key route to aerosol from aromatics (vol 14, 4984, 2023), Nat. Commun., 14, 8303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44213-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-44213-y</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ji, Y., Huey, L. G., Tanner, D. J., Lee, Y. R., Veres, P. R., Neuman, J. A., Wang, Y., and Wang, X.: A vacuum ultraviolet ion source (VUV-IS) for iodide–chemical ionization mass spectrometry: a substitute for radioactive ion sources, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3683–3696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3683-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-3683-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Ji, Y. M., Zhao, J., Terazono, H., Misawa, K., Levitt, N. P., Li, Y. X., Lin, Y., Peng, J. F., Wang, Y., Duan, L., Pan, B. W., Zhang, F., Feng, X. D., An, T. C., Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Zhang, A. L., Shibuya, K., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R. Y.: Reassessing the atmospheric oxidation mechanism of toluene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 8169–8174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705463114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1705463114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Klotz, B., Sorensen, S., Barnes, I., Becker, K. H., Etzkorn, T., Volkamer, R., Platt, U., Wirtz, K., and Martín-Reviejo, M.: Atmospheric oxidation of toluene in a large-volume outdoor photoreactor: In situ determination of ring-retaining product yields, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 10289–10299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp982719n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp982719n</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Kurtén, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Thornton, J. A.: An Iodide-Adduct High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Chemical-Ionization Mass Spectrometer: Application to Atmospheric Inorganic and Organic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 6309–6317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es500362a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es500362a</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Li, M., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Tong, D., Lei, Y., Liu, F., Hong, C., Kang, S., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Bo, Y., Su, H., Cheng, Y., and He, K.: Persistent growth of anthropogenic non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) emissions in China during 1990–2017: drivers, speciation and ozone formation potential, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8897–8913, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8897-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8897-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Iyer, S., Mohr, C., Lee, B. H., D'Ambro, E. L., Kurtén, T., and Thornton, J. A.: Constraining the sensitivity of iodide adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry to multifunctional organic molecules using the collision limit and thermodynamic stability of iodide ion adducts, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1505–1512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1505-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1505-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Molteni, U., Bianchi, F., Klein, F., El Haddad, I., Frege, C., Rossi, M. J., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1909–1921, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., and Ramjugernath, D.: Estimation of pure component properties. Part 4: Estimation of the saturated liquid viscosity of non-electrolyte organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions, Fluid Phase Equilibr., 281, 97–119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2009.02.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fluid.2009.02.016</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Nozière, B. and Hanson, D. R.: Speciated Monitoring of Gas-Phase Organic Peroxy Radicals by Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Cross-Reactions between CH<sub>3</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>3</sub>(CO)O<sub>2</sub>, (CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>, and c-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>11</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 8453–8464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06456" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06456</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation> Orlando, J. J. and Tyndall, G. S.: Laboratory studies of organic peroxy radical chemistry: an overview with emphasis on recent issues of atmospheric significance, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 8213–8213, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Pai, S. J., Heald, C. L., Pierce, J. R., Farina, S. C., Marais, E. A., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Middlebrook, A. M., Coe, H., Shilling, J. E., Bahreini, R., Dingle, J. H., and Vu, K.: An evaluation of global organic aerosol schemes using airborne observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2637–2665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Pichelstorfer, L., Roldin, P., Rissanen, M., Hyttinen, N., Garmash, O., Xavier, C., Zhou, P., Clusius, P., Foreback, B., Almeida, T. G., Deng, C. J., Baykara, M., Kurten, T., and Boy, M.: Towards automated inclusion of autoxidation chemistry in models: from precursors to atmospheric implications, Environ. Sci.-Atmos., 4, 879–896, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ea00054d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d4ea00054d</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Riipinen, I., Yli-Juuti, T., Pierce, J. R., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., and Donahue, N. M.: The contribution of organics to atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Nat. Geosci., 5, 453–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1499</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Riva, M., Pospisilova, V., Frege, C., Perrier, S., Bansal, P., Jorga, S., Sturm, P., Thornton, J. A., Rohner, U., and Lopez-Hilfiker, F.: Evaluation of a reduced-pressure chemical ion reactor utilizing adduct ionization for the detection of gaseous organic and inorganic species, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5887–5901, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5887-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-5887-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Smith, D. F., Kleindienst, T. E., and McIver, C. D.: Primary product distributions from the reaction of OH with p-, m-xylene, 1,2,4- and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, J. Atmos. Chem., 34, 339–364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006277328628" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1006277328628</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Song, M., He, S., Li, X., Liu, Y., Lou, S., Lu, S., Zeng, L., and Zhang, Y.: Optimizing the iodide-adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) quantitative method for toluene oxidation intermediates: experimental insights into functional-group differences, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5113–5127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5113-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-5113-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Song, M. D., Liu, Y., Li, X., and Lu, S. H.: Advances on Atmospheric Oxidation Mechanism of Typical Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Acta Chim. Sinica, 79, 1214–1231, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6023/A21050224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6023/A21050224</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Tuazon, E. C., Macleod, H., Atkinson, R., and Carter, W. P. L.: Alpha-Dicarbonyl Yields from the Nox-Air Photooxidations of a Series of Aromatic-Hydrocarbons in Air, Environ. Sci. Technol., 20, 383–387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00146a010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es00146a010</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L. H., Wang, Y. W., Yang, G., Li, Y. Y., Liu, Y. L., Lu, Y. Q., Yao, L., and Wang, L.: Measurements of Atmospheric HO<sub>2</sub> Radicals Using Br-CIMS with Elimination of Potential Interferences from Ambient Peroxynitric Acid, Anal. Chem., 96, 13792–13800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01184" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01184</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S. N., Riva, M., Yan, C., Ehn, M., and Wang, L. M.: Primary Formation of Highly Oxidized Multifunctional Products in the OH-Initiated Oxidation of Isoprene: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 12255–12264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02783" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b02783</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Yang, G., Yang, X., Wu, Y., Yao, L., Zhang, H., and Wang, L.: Secondary reactions of aromatics-derived oxygenated organic molecules lead to plentiful highly oxygenated organic molecules within an intraday OH exposure, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7961–7981, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7961-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-7961-2024</ext-link>, 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Watne, Å. K., Psichoudaki, M., Ljungström, E., Le Breton, M., Hallquist, M., Jerksjö, M., Fallgren, H., Jutterström, S., and Hallquist, Å. M.: Fresh and Oxidized Emissions from In-Use Transit Buses Running on Diesel, Biodiesel, and CNG, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 7720–7728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01394" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b01394</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Whalley, L. K., Edwards, P. M., Furneaux, K. L., Goddard, A., Ingham, T., Evans, M. J., Stone, D., Hopkins, J. R., Jones, C. E., Karunaharan, A., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Monks, P. S., Moller, S. J., and Heard, D. E.: Quantifying the magnitude of a missing hydroxyl radical source in a tropical rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7223–7233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Wu, R. R. and Xie, S. D.: Spatial Distribution of Ozone Formation in China Derived from Emissions of Speciated Volatile Organic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2574–2583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03634</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Wu, R. R., Pan, S. S., Li, Y., and Wang, L. M.: Atmospheric Oxidation Mechanism of Toluene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 4533–4547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500077f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp500077f</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wu, X. Q., Huang, C., Niu, S. Y., and Zhang, F.: New theoretical insights into the reaction kinetics of toluene and hydroxyl radicals, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 22, 22279–22288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp02984j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d0cp02984j</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Moller, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Wennberg, P. O.: New Insights into the Radical Chemistry and Product Distribution in the OH-Initiated Oxidation of Benzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 13467–13477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04780" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c04780</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Yang, X. P., Li, Y., Ma, X. F., Tan, Z. F., Lu, K. D., and Zhang, Y. H.: Unclassical Radical Generation Mechanisms in the Troposphere: A Review, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 15888–15909, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.4c00742</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Yang, X. P., Wang, H. C., Lu, K. D., Ma, X. F., Tan, Z. F., Long, B., Chen, X. R., Li, C. M., Zhai, T. Y., Li, Y., Qu, K., Xia, Y., Zhang, Y. Q., Li, X., Chen, S. Y., Dong, H. B., Zeng, L. M., and Zhang, Y. H.: Reactive aldehyde chemistry explains the missing source of hydroxyl radicals, Nat. Commun., 15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45885-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-024-45885-w</ext-link>, 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y. D., Shao, M., Wang, X. M., Nölscher, A. C., Kessel, S., Guenther, A., and Williams, J.: Towards a quantitative understanding of total OH reactivity: A review, Atmos. Environ., 134, 147–161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.010</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Y., Guo, S., Wang, H., Shen, R. Z., Zhu, W. F., Tan, R., Song, K., Zhang, Z. R., Li, S. D., Chen, Y. F., and Hu, M.: Importance of Semivolatile/Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds to Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Chinese Domestic Cooking Emissions, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 9, 507–512, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00207</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Zaytsev, A., Koss, A. R., Breitenlechner, M., Krechmer, J. E., Nihill, K. J., Lim, C. Y., Rowe, J. C., Cox, J. L., Moss, J., Roscioli, J. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Kroll, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Mechanistic study of the formation of ring-retaining and ring-opening products from the oxidation of aromatic compounds under urban atmospheric conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15117–15129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15117-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-15117-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Zaytsev, A., Breitenlechner, M., Novelli, A., Fuchs, H., Knopf, D. A., Kroll, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Application of chemical derivatization techniques combined with chemical ionization mass spectrometry to detect stabilized Criegee intermediates and peroxy radicals in the gas phase, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2501–2513, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2501-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-2501-2021</ext-link>, 2021. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H. X., Chen, C. R., Yan, W. J., Wu, N. N., Bo, Y., Zhang, Q., and He, K. B.: Characteristics and sources of non-methane VOCs and their roles in SOA formation during autumn in a central Chinese city, Sci. Total Environ., 782, 146802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146802" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146802</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H., McVay, R. C., Lignell, H., Coggon, M. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Vapor wall deposition in Teflon chambers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4197–4214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Thornton, J. A., and Pye, H. O. T.: Quantitative constraints on autoxidation and dimer formation from direct probing of monoterpene-derived peroxy radical chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 12142–12147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812147115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1812147115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, J., Wang, S., Wang, H., Jing, S., Lou, S., Saiz-Lopez, A., and Zhou, B.: Observationally constrained modeling of atmospheric oxidation capacity and photochemical reactivity in Shanghai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1217–1232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1217-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1217-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Speciated measurement of bicyclic peroxy  radicals via iodide-CIMS and its implication on OH-initiated aromatic oxidation</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aggarwal, S., Bansal, P., Wang, Y., Jorga, S., Macgregor, G., Rohner, U., Bannan, T., Salter, M., Zieger, P., Mohr, C., and Lopez-Hilfiker, F.: Identifying key parameters that affect sensitivity of flow tube chemical ionization mass spectrometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4227–4247, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4227-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4227-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arey, J., Obermeyer, G., Aschmann, S. M., Chattopadhyay, S., Cusick, R. D.,
and Atkinson, R.: Dicarbonyl Products of the OH Radical-Initiated Reaction
of a Series of Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 683–689,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8019098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es8019098</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Atkinson, R., Aschmann, S. M., and Arey, J.: Formation of Ring-Retaining
Products from the Oh Radical-Initated Reactions of Ortho-Xylene,
Meta-Xylene, and Para-Xylene, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 23, 77–97, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550230108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550230108</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barber, V. P. and Kroll, J. H.: Chemistry of Functionalized Reactive Organic
Intermediates in the Earth's Atmosphere: Impact, Challenges, and Progress, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 125, 10264–10279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c08221" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c08221</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barker, J. R., Steiner, A. L., and Wallington, T. J.: Advances in
atmospheric chemistry, World Scientific, New Jersey, Vols.
1–2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/11031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/11031</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berndt, T., Richters, S., Kaethner, R., Voigtländer, J., Stratmann, F.,
Sipilä, M., Kulmala, M., and Herrmann, H.: Gas-Phase Ozonolysis of
Cycloalkenes: Formation of Highly Oxidized RO<sub>2</sub> Radicals and Their
Reactions with NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and Other RO<sub>2</sub> Radicals, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 119, 10336–10348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07295" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07295</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berndt, T., Mender, B., Scholz, W., Fischer, L., Herrmann, H., Kulmala, M.,
and Hansel, A.: Accretion Product Formation from Ozonolysis and OH Radical
Reaction of <i>α</i>-Pinene: Mechanistic Insight and the Influence of
Isoprene and Ethylene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 11069–11077,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02210</a>, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berndt, T., Scholz, W., Mentler, B., Fischer, L., Herrmann, H., Kulmala, M.,
and Hansel, A.: Accretion Product Formation from Self- and Cross-Reactions
of RO<sub>2</sub> Radicals in the Atmosphere, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 57,
3820–3824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201710989" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201710989</a>, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berndt, T., Hyttinen, N., Herrmann, H., and Hansel, A.: First oxidation
products from the reaction of hydroxyl radicals with isoprene for pristine
environmental conditions, Commun. Chem., 2,  21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-019-0120-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-019-0120-9</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Birdsall, A. W., Andreoni, J. F., and Elrod, M. J.: Investigation of the
Role of Bicyclic Peroxy Radicals in the Oxidation Mechanism of Toluene, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 114, 10655–10663, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp105467e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp105467e</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Calvert, J. G. and Calvert, J. G.: The mechanisms of atmospheric oxidation
of aromatic hydrocarbons, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 556
pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195146288.001.0001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195146288.001.0001</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cui, L., Wu, D., Wang, S., Xu, Q., Hu, R., and Hao, J.: Measurement report: Ambient volatile organic compound (VOC) pollution in urban Beijing: characteristics, sources, and implications for pollution control, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11931–11944, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11931-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11931-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ehn, M., Kleist, E., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Lönn, G., Schobesberger, S., Dal Maso, M., Trimborn, A., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wahner, A., Wildt, J., and Mentel, Th. F.: Gas phase formation of extremely oxidized pinene reaction products in chamber and ambient air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5113–5127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5113-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5113-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H.,
Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B.,
Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T.,
Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurtén,
T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal
Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M.,
Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of
low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elrod, M. J.: Kinetics Study of the Aromatic Bicyclic Peroxy Radical plus NO
Reaction: Overall Rate Constant and Nitrate Product Yield Measurements, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 115, 8125–8130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp204308f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp204308f</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Galloway, M. M., Huisman, A. J., Yee, L. D., Chan, A. W. H., Loza, C. L., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Yields of oxidized volatile organic compounds during the OH radical initiated oxidation of isoprene, methyl vinyl ketone, and methacrolein under high-NOx conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10779–10790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10779-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10779-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garmash, O., Rissanen, M. P., Pullinen, I., Schmitt, S., Kausiala, O., Tillmann, R., Zhao, D., Percival, C., Bannan, T. J., Priestley, M., Hallquist, Å. M., Kleist, E., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Hallquist, M., Berndt, T., McFiggans, G., Wildt, J., Mentel, T. F., and Ehn, M.: Multi-generation OH oxidation as a source for highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 515–537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-515-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-515-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gomez Alvarez, E., Viidanoja, J., Muñoz, A., Wirtz, K., and Hjorth, J.:
Experimental confirmation of the dicarbonyl route in the photo-oxidation of
toluene and benzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8362–8369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0713274" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0713274</a>,
2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hansel, A., Scholz, W., Mentler, B., Fischer, L., and Berndt, T.: Detection
of RO<sub>2</sub> radicals and other products from cyclohexene ozonolysis with
NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and acetate chemical ionization mass spectrometry, Atmos.
Environ., 186, 248–255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.023</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, S. Y., Liu, Y., Song, M. D., Li, X., Lu, S. H., Chen, T. Z., Mu, Y. J.,
Lou, S. R., Shi, X. D., Qiu, X. H., Zhu, T., and Zhang, Y. H.: Insights into
the Peroxide-Bicyclic Intermediate Pathway of Aromatic Photooxidation:
Experimental Yields and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-Dependency of Ring-Opening and
Ring-Retaining Products, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 20657–20668,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05304</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, S. Y., Liu, Y., Song, M. D., Li, X., Lou, S. R., Ye, C. S., Liu, Y. J.,
Liu, Y., Ye, J. R., Lu, S. H., Zhou, W. X., Qiu, X. H., Zhu, T., and Zeng,
L. M.: Empirical Approach to Quantifying Sensitivity in Different Chemical
Ionization Techniques for Organonitrates and Nitroaromatics Constrained by
Ion-Molecule Reaction and Transmission Efficiency, Anal. Chem., 96,
16882–16890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c03751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c03751</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hofzumahaus, A., Rohrer, F., Lu, K. D., Bohn, B., Brauers, T., Chang, C. C.,
Fuchs, H., Holland, F., Kita, K., Kondo, Y., Li, X., Lou, S. R., Shao, M.,
Zeng, L. M., Wahner, A., and Zhang, Y. H.: Amplified Trace Gas Removal in
the Troposphere, Science, 324, 1702–1704, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164566" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164566</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Massoli, P., O'Brien, R., Lim, C., Franklin, J. P.,
Moss, J. A., Hunter, J. F., Nowak, J. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Misztal, P.
K., Arata, C., Roscioli, J. R., Herndon, S. T., Onasch, T. B., Lambe, A. T.,
Jayne, J. T., Su, L. P., Knopf, D. A., Goldstein, A. H., Worsnop, D. R., and
Kroll, J. H.: Chemical evolution of atmospheric organic carbon over multiple
generations of oxidation, Nat. Chem., 10, 462–468, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0002-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0002-2</a>,
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Iyer, S., Kumar, A., Savolainen, A., Barua, S., Daub, C., Pichelstorfer, L.,
Roldin, P., Garmash, O., Seal, P., Kurtén, T., and Rissanen, M.:
Molecular rearrangement of bicyclic peroxy radicals is a key route to
aerosol from aromatics (vol 14, 4984, 2023), Nat. Commun., 14, 8303,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44213-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44213-y</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ji, Y., Huey, L. G., Tanner, D. J., Lee, Y. R., Veres, P. R., Neuman, J. A., Wang, Y., and Wang, X.: A vacuum ultraviolet ion source (VUV-IS) for iodide–chemical ionization mass spectrometry: a substitute for radioactive ion sources, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3683–3696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3683-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3683-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ji, Y. M., Zhao, J., Terazono, H., Misawa, K., Levitt, N. P., Li, Y. X.,
Lin, Y., Peng, J. F., Wang, Y., Duan, L., Pan, B. W., Zhang, F., Feng, X.
D., An, T. C., Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Zhang, A. L., Shibuya, K.,
Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R. Y.: Reassessing the atmospheric oxidation
mechanism of toluene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 8169–8174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705463114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705463114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Klotz, B., Sorensen, S., Barnes, I., Becker, K. H., Etzkorn, T., Volkamer,
R., Platt, U., Wirtz, K., and Martín-Reviejo, M.: Atmospheric oxidation
of toluene in a large-volume outdoor photoreactor: In situ determination of
ring-retaining product yields, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 10289–10299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp982719n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp982719n</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Kurtén, T., Worsnop, D. R.,
and Thornton, J. A.: An Iodide-Adduct High-Resolution Time-of-Flight
Chemical-Ionization Mass Spectrometer: Application to Atmospheric Inorganic
and Organic Compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 6309–6317,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es500362a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es500362a</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, M., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Tong, D., Lei, Y., Liu, F., Hong, C., Kang, S., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Bo, Y., Su, H., Cheng, Y., and He, K.: Persistent growth of anthropogenic non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) emissions in China during 1990–2017: drivers, speciation and ozone formation potential, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8897–8913, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8897-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8897-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Iyer, S., Mohr, C., Lee, B. H., D'Ambro, E. L., Kurtén, T., and Thornton, J. A.: Constraining the sensitivity of iodide adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry to multifunctional organic molecules using the collision limit and thermodynamic stability of iodide ion adducts, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1505–1512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1505-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1505-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Molteni, U., Bianchi, F., Klein, F., El Haddad, I., Frege, C., Rossi, M. J., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1909–1921, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nannoolal, Y., Rarey, J., and Ramjugernath, D.: Estimation of pure component
properties. Part 4: Estimation of the saturated liquid viscosity of
non-electrolyte organic compounds via group contributions and group
interactions, Fluid Phase Equilibr., 281, 97–119,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2009.02.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2009.02.016</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nozière, B. and Hanson, D. R.: Speciated Monitoring of Gas-Phase Organic
Peroxy Radicals by Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Cross-Reactions
between CH<sub>3</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>3</sub>(CO)O<sub>2</sub>, (CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>, and
c-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>11</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 8453–8464,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06456" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06456</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Orlando, J. J. and Tyndall, G. S.: Laboratory studies of organic peroxy
radical chemistry: an overview with emphasis on recent issues of atmospheric
significance, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 8213–8213, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pai, S. J., Heald, C. L., Pierce, J. R., Farina, S. C., Marais, E. A., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Middlebrook, A. M., Coe, H., Shilling, J. E., Bahreini, R., Dingle, J. H., and Vu, K.: An evaluation of global organic aerosol schemes using airborne observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2637–2665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pichelstorfer, L., Roldin, P., Rissanen, M., Hyttinen, N., Garmash, O.,
Xavier, C., Zhou, P., Clusius, P., Foreback, B., Almeida, T. G., Deng, C.
J., Baykara, M., Kurten, T., and Boy, M.: Towards automated inclusion of
autoxidation chemistry in models: from precursors to atmospheric
implications, Environ. Sci.-Atmos., 4, 879–896, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ea00054d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ea00054d</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riipinen, I., Yli-Juuti, T., Pierce, J. R., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D.
R., Kulmala, M., and Donahue, N. M.: The contribution of organics to
atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Nat. Geosci., 5, 453–458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1499</a>,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riva, M., Pospisilova, V., Frege, C., Perrier, S., Bansal, P., Jorga, S., Sturm, P., Thornton, J. A., Rohner, U., and Lopez-Hilfiker, F.: Evaluation of a reduced-pressure chemical ion reactor utilizing adduct ionization for the detection of gaseous organic and inorganic species, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5887–5901, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5887-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5887-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, D. F., Kleindienst, T. E., and McIver, C. D.: Primary product
distributions from the reaction of OH with p-, m-xylene, 1,2,4- and
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, J. Atmos. Chem., 34, 339–364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006277328628" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006277328628</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, M., He, S., Li, X., Liu, Y., Lou, S., Lu, S., Zeng, L., and Zhang, Y.: Optimizing the iodide-adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) quantitative method for toluene oxidation intermediates: experimental insights into functional-group differences, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5113–5127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5113-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5113-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, M. D., Liu, Y., Li, X., and Lu, S. H.: Advances on Atmospheric
Oxidation Mechanism of Typical Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Acta Chim. Sinica, 79,
1214–1231, <a href="https://doi.org/10.6023/A21050224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6023/A21050224</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tuazon, E. C., Macleod, H., Atkinson, R., and Carter, W. P. L.:
Alpha-Dicarbonyl Yields from the Nox-Air Photooxidations of a Series of
Aromatic-Hydrocarbons in Air, Environ. Sci. Technol., 20, 383–387, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es00146a010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es00146a010</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, L. H., Wang, Y. W., Yang, G., Li, Y. Y., Liu, Y. L., Lu, Y. Q., Yao,
L., and Wang, L.: Measurements of Atmospheric HO<sub>2</sub> Radicals Using
Br-CIMS with Elimination of Potential Interferences from Ambient
Peroxynitric Acid, Anal. Chem., 96, 13792–13800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01184" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01184</a>,
2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, S. N., Riva, M., Yan, C., Ehn, M., and Wang, L. M.: Primary Formation
of Highly Oxidized Multifunctional Products in the OH-Initiated Oxidation of
Isoprene: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 52, 12255–12264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02783" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02783</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Yang, G., Yang, X., Wu, Y., Yao, L., Zhang, H., and Wang, L.: Secondary reactions of aromatics-derived oxygenated organic molecules lead to plentiful highly oxygenated organic molecules within an intraday OH exposure, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7961–7981, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7961-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7961-2024</a>, 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Watne, Å. K., Psichoudaki, M., Ljungström, E., Le Breton, M.,
Hallquist, M., Jerksjö, M., Fallgren, H., Jutterström, S., and
Hallquist, Å. M.: Fresh and Oxidized Emissions from In-Use Transit Buses
Running on Diesel, Biodiesel, and CNG, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 7720–7728,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01394" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01394</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Whalley, L. K., Edwards, P. M., Furneaux, K. L., Goddard, A., Ingham, T., Evans, M. J., Stone, D., Hopkins, J. R., Jones, C. E., Karunaharan, A., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Monks, P. S., Moller, S. J., and Heard, D. E.: Quantifying the magnitude of a missing hydroxyl radical source in a tropical rainforest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7223–7233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7223-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, R. R. and Xie, S. D.: Spatial Distribution of Ozone Formation in China
Derived from Emissions of Speciated Volatile Organic Compounds, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 51, 2574–2583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03634</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, R. R., Pan, S. S., Li, Y., and Wang, L. M.: Atmospheric Oxidation
Mechanism of Toluene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 4533–4547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500077f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500077f</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, X. Q., Huang, C., Niu, S. Y., and Zhang, F.: New theoretical insights
into the reaction kinetics of toluene and hydroxyl radicals, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys., 22, 22279–22288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp02984j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp02984j</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, L., Moller, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Wennberg, P.
O.: New Insights into the Radical Chemistry and Product Distribution in the
OH-Initiated Oxidation of Benzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 13467–13477,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04780" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04780</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, X. P., Li, Y., Ma, X. F., Tan, Z. F., Lu, K. D., and Zhang, Y. H.:
Unclassical Radical Generation Mechanisms in the Troposphere: A Review,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 15888–15909, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00742" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00742</a>, 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, X. P., Wang, H. C., Lu, K. D., Ma, X. F., Tan, Z. F., Long, B., Chen,
X. R., Li, C. M., Zhai, T. Y., Li, Y., Qu, K., Xia, Y., Zhang, Y. Q., Li,
X., Chen, S. Y., Dong, H. B., Zeng, L. M., and Zhang, Y. H.: Reactive
aldehyde chemistry explains the missing source of hydroxyl radicals, Nat.
Commun., 15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45885-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45885-w</a>, 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Y. D., Shao, M., Wang, X. M., Nölscher, A. C., Kessel, S.,
Guenther, A., and Williams, J.: Towards a quantitative understanding of
total OH reactivity: A review, Atmos. Environ., 134, 147–161,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.010</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, Y., Guo, S., Wang, H., Shen, R. Z., Zhu, W. F., Tan, R., Song, K.,
Zhang, Z. R., Li, S. D., Chen, Y. F., and Hu, M.: Importance of
Semivolatile/Intermediate-Volatility Organic Compounds to Secondary Organic
Aerosol Formation from Chinese Domestic Cooking Emissions, Environ. Sci. Tech.
Let., 9, 507–512, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00207</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaytsev, A., Koss, A. R., Breitenlechner, M., Krechmer, J. E., Nihill, K. J., Lim, C. Y., Rowe, J. C., Cox, J. L., Moss, J., Roscioli, J. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Kroll, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Mechanistic study of the formation of ring-retaining and ring-opening products from the oxidation of aromatic compounds under urban atmospheric conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15117–15129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15117-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15117-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaytsev, A., Breitenlechner, M., Novelli, A., Fuchs, H., Knopf, D. A., Kroll, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Application of chemical derivatization techniques combined with chemical ionization mass spectrometry to detect stabilized Criegee intermediates and peroxy radicals in the gas phase, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2501–2513, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2501-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2501-2021</a>, 2021.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, H. X., Chen, C. R., Yan, W. J., Wu, N. N., Bo, Y., Zhang, Q., and He,
K. B.: Characteristics and sources of non-methane VOCs and their roles in
SOA formation during autumn in a central Chinese city, Sci. Total Environ.,
782, 146802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146802" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146802</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, X., Schwantes, R. H., McVay, R. C., Lignell, H., Coggon, M. M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Vapor wall deposition in Teflon chambers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4197–4214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4197-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, Y., Thornton, J. A., and Pye, H. O. T.: Quantitative constraints on
autoxidation and dimer formation from direct probing of monoterpene-derived
peroxy radical chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 12142–12147,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812147115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812147115</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhu, J., Wang, S., Wang, H., Jing, S., Lou, S., Saiz-Lopez, A., and Zhou, B.: Observationally constrained modeling of atmospheric oxidation capacity and photochemical reactivity in Shanghai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1217–1232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1217-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1217-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
