<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-24-9131-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>Markedly different impacts of primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation on aerosol mixing states revealed by simultaneous measurements of CCNC, H(/V)TDMA, and SP2</article-title><alt-title>Influences of primary and secondary aerosols on mixing states</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff8">
          <name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>Jiangchuan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7118-8070</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff8">
          <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Biao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Weiqi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Gang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7160-4600</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname> Xu</surname><given-names>Hanbin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff8">
          <name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>Biao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff8">
          <name><surname>Zhai</surname><given-names>Miaomiao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Wanyun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Huarong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Sanxue</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Guangsheng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name>
          <email>liul@gd121.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff8">
          <name><surname>Kuang</surname><given-names>Ye</given-names></name>
          <email>kuangye@jnu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-9784</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Yele</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-0221</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, College of Environment and Climate, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 511443, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Regional Numerical Weather Prediction, Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Guangzhou, 510640, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather and Key Laboratory for Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Composition, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Experimental Teaching Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, International Joint Laboratory for Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Hebei Gucheng Agricultural Meteorology National Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511443, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Li Liu (liul@gd121.cn) and Ye Kuang (kuangye@jnu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>August</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>9131</fpage><lpage>9154</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>December</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>February</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>April</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>June</month><year>2024</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e253">​​​​​​​This study compares aerosol mixing-state parameters obtained via simultaneous measurements using DMA–CCNC, H(/V)TDMA, and DMA–SP2, shedding light on the impacts of primary aerosol emissions and secondary aerosol (SA) formation. The analysis reveals significant variations in mixing-state parameters among different techniques, with VTDMA and DMA–SP2 indicating that non-volatile particles mainly stem from black carbon (BC)-containing aerosols, while a substantial proportion of nearly hydrophobic aerosols originates from fossil fuel combustion and biomass-burning emissions. Synthesizing the results, some nearly hydrophobic BC-free particles were found to be cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)-inactive under the measured supersaturated conditions, likely from fossil fuel combustion emissions, while others were CCN-active, linked to biomass-burning emissions. Moreover, BC-containing aerosols emitted from fossil fuel combustion exhibit more external mixing with other aerosol components compared to those from biomass burning. Secondary nitrate and organic aerosol formation significantly affect aerosol mixing states, enhancing aerosol hygroscopicity and volatility while reducing heterogeneity among techniques. The study also highlights distinct physical properties of two resolved secondary organic aerosol factors, hinting at their formation through different mechanisms. These findings underscore the importance of comparing aerosol mixing states from different techniques as a tool for understanding aerosol physical properties from different sources and their responses to SA formation, as well as aiding in the exploration of SA formation mechanisms.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42175083</award-id>
<award-id>42175127</award-id>
<award-id>42275066</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e265">The aerosol mixing state is a crucial physicochemical property of aerosol particles (Riemer et al., 2019), exerting a significant impact on their optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity, thus affecting their impact on the climate and environment (Fierce et al., 2017; Riemer et al., 2019; Stevens et al., 2022). For example, variations in the mixing state of black carbon (BC) particles can significantly alter their absorption and radiative effects (Bond et al., 2013; Lack et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2019; Moffet et al., 2016; Matsui et al., 2018; Peng et al., 2016). Using simple internal mixing-state assumptions for aerosol chemical components to estimate CCN number concentrations can lead to substantial overestimations (up to 30 %; Deng et al., 2013; Farmer et al., 2015; Ren et al., 2018; Ching et al., 2017, 2019; Tao et al., 2021). The aerosol mixing state varies widely due to complex emissions and atmospheric transformations, leading to significant uncertainties in estimating the effects of aerosols based on simplified mixing-state assumptions (Ervens, 2015; Wang et al., 2022; Fu et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e268">The aerosol mixing state describes the mixture of aerosol chemical components within each particle and the distribution of these particles in the aerosol population. This property can be directly measured using single-particle chemical composition techniques (Fierce et al., 2017; Riemer et al., 2019), such as the single-particle soot photometer (SP2), which measures refractory black carbon (rBC) mass concentrations and the mixing state of rBC with other aerosol components, or single-particle chemical composition measurement techniques (e.g., single-particle aerosol mass spectrometer, SP-AMS) that have been developed in recent years (Lee et al., 2019; Riemer et al., 2019, and references therein). Alternatively, the aerosol mixing state can be inferred from indirect measurements of aerosol properties, such as size-resolved aerosol CCN activity (measured by coupling a differential mobility analyzer, DMA, and a CCN counter, CCNC), size-resolved aerosol hygroscopicity distributions, or volatility distributions (measured by a humidified/volatility tandem differential mobility analyzer, H(/V)TDMA).</p>
      <p id="d1e271">However, each technique yields information on aerosol mixing states based on different aerosol microphysical properties, thus obtaining aerosol mixing states that are different but linked to one another. For instance, while both CCN activity and hygroscopic growth measurements are associated with aerosol hygroscopicity, an intercomparison between CCNC and HTDMA measurements has prompted investigations into aerosol hygroscopicity variations under different saturation conditions (Su et al., 2010; Jurányi et al., 2013; Lance et al., 2013; Kawana et al., 2016; Tao et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2021). Although the SP2 and VTDMA techniques depend on the evaporation of non-refractory compositions, only rBC remains in the SP2 measurements. In contrast, non-refractory composition evaporation depends on the thermodynamic temperature in the VTDMA measurements. Thus, measurements of an SP2 are highly correlated to those of a VTDMA at high temperatures (200–300 °C), with their differences reflecting variations in aerosol density, shape, or volatility (Philippin et al., 2004; Wehner et al., 2009; Adachi et al., 2018, 2019; Wang et al., 2022). HTDMA and VTDMA can be combined to study the influence of the aerosol mixing state on  hygroscopicity and volatility (Zhang et al., 2016; Cai et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). Strong correlations were found between the hydrophobic and non-volatile particles, suggesting that they might have similar chemical compositions (Zhang et al., 2016). In addition, some studies have shown that, except for BC, low-volatility particles correlate well with CCN-inactive particles based on VTDMA and CCNC measurements (Kuwata et al., 2007; Kuwata and Kondo, 2008; Rose et al., 2011; Cheng et al., 2012). Therefore, intercomparisons between mixing-state parameters measured by distinct techniques provide a better characterization of the aerosol mixing state and provide insight into aerosol physiochemical properties. Previous studies have mainly compared two types of aerosol mixing-state measurements and lacked a comprehensive comparative analysis among SP2, DMA-CCN, and H(/V)TDMA measurements, hindering the wide application of derived aerosol mixing states obtained by individual techniques.</p>
      <p id="d1e274">The mixing state of primary aerosols can vary greatly, depending on their type and emission conditions (Cheng et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2017, 2022; Ting et al., 2018; D. Liu et al., 2021), and can be significantly altered during aging processes or secondary formation (Wehner et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2022; Tomlin et al., 2021; Lata et al., 2021). Primary aerosol  emissions, such as biomass burning, fossil fuel combustion, and cooking, tend to contribute to weak hygroscopicity (Herich et al., 2008, 2009; Wang et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2020) and low-volatility aerosols (Hong et al., 2017; Saha et al., 2018). The formation of secondary aerosols (SAs), including the aging of BC-containing particles and primary organic aerosols, mainly contributes to aerosols with strong CCN activity (Mei et al., 2013; Ma et al., 2016; Tao et al., 2021) and high hygroscopicity (Chen et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). It is important to study the impact of specific primary aerosol emissions and SA formation on aerosol mixing states and the influence of aerosol mixing-state parameters derived from different techniques to enhance our understanding of the mixing state of aerosols from different emission sources and improve their characterization in models.</p>
      <p id="d1e278">The North China Plain (NCP) is among the most polluted regions in China with various primary emission sources and strong SA formations that play critical roles in air pollution (Xu et al., 2011; Tao et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2015). The complex mixing state of aerosols in the NCP contributes to uncertainties in evaluating their climate and environmental effects (Zhuang et al., 2013; Nordmann et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2016; Tao et al., 2020; Shi et al., 2022), particularly regarding BC particles (Wu et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2019). Meteorological conditions can greatly affect SA formation in the NCP and can be significantly exacerbated during severe pollution events. SA formation under low-relative-humidity (RH) conditions, mainly through the condensation of gaseous-phase oxidation products, would change to that mainly occurring in the aqueous phase under high-RH conditions (Kuang et al., 2020). Because SAs formed through different mechanisms have different chemical compositions and add mass to different aerosol populations, SA formation under different meteorological conditions can affect the aerosol mixing states differently (Tao et al., 2021). This study obtained the aerosol mixing state through concurrent measurements of the CCN activity, hygroscopicity, volatility, and BC particles at a regional site in the NCP using CCNC, HTDMA, VTDMA, and SP2 instruments. This provides a unique opportunity to perform a comprehensive intercomparison of the aerosol mixing states among different techniques to gain insight into the impact of primary aerosol emissions and SA formation on the observed aerosol mixing states.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Campaign information and instrument setup</title>
      <p id="d1e296">From 16 October to 16 November 2021, aerosol mixing states were continuously and concurrently monitored using different techniques at the Gucheng site in Dingxing County, Hebei Province, China, as part of a campaign to investigate AQueous Secondary aerOsol Formation in Fogs and Aerosols and their Radiative effects in the NCP (AQ-SOFAR). The observation site, located at 39°09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 115°44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, is an Ecological and Agricultural Meteorology Station of the Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, situated between the megacities of Beijing (approximately 100 km away) and Baoding (approximately 40 km away) and surrounded by farmlands and small towns. This site provides a representative view of the background atmospheric pollution conditions in the NCP (Kuang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e317">Different measurement techniques were used to simultaneously obtain the aerosol mixing state through CCN activity, hygroscopicity, volatility, and BC particle observations. In addition to aerosol mixing-state measurements, the AQ-SOFAR campaign includes measurements of the aerosol number size distribution, chemical composition, aerosol scattering, and absorption properties. Aerosol number size distributions in the diameter range of 13 nm–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured by the scanning mobility particle sizer (13–550 nm) and the aerodynamic aerosol classifier (100 nm–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and they are merged by assuming an aerosol density of 1.6 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The total BC mass concentrations were determined using an Aethalometer (Magee, AE33; Drinovec et al., 2015); more information on the correction of absorption measurements and mass concentration calculations is available in Luo et al. (2022). All aerosol measurement instruments were housed in a temperature-controlled container at 24 °C. The inlet was switched among three impactors: TSPs (total suspended particles), PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (particulate matter with an aerodynamic  diameter of less than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Inlet changes among impactors affect dry-state aerosol sampling owing to ambient aerosols being enlarged through aerosol hygroscopic growth or activation. However, the aerosol mixing-state and aerosol chemical composition measurements were made on submicron  aerosols, and the inlet change almost did not affect those measurements under conditions of RH that was less than 90 %. The sampled aerosol was dried by two parallelly assembled Nafion dryers with a length of 1.2 m. Two Nafion dryers used because of the high RH and sample flow rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the campaign to ensure drying efficiency. The flow rate is carefully adjusted in the inlet in order to ensure accurate aerosol particle size cutoff. In addition, during autumn and winter in the NCP, ambient air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 °C and sometimes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 °C) can be significantly lower than the room temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 °C). Therefore, this dryer system can maintain the RH of the sampled aerosols to below 20 %. Meteorological data such as temperature, pressure, wind speed, wind direction, and RH were obtained from an automatic weather station operated by the station.</p>
      <p id="d1e432">The chemical composition of the submicron aerosols was analyzed using a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS). The ionization efficiency (IE) was calibrated using 300 nm diameter pure NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles and following the standard protocols outlined in Jayne et al. (2000) in the middle of the campaign, with the relative ionization efficiency (RIE) of ammonium determined to be 5.26. The RIE of sulfate was 1.28, using pure (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particles, and the default RIEs of 1.4 for organic aerosols, 1.1 for nitrates, and 1.3 for chloride were used as the organic aerosols. The composition-dependent collection efficiency reported by Middlebrook et al. (2012) was used. Elemental ratios were derived using the “Improved-Ambient (I-A)” method as described in Canagaratna et al. (2015), including hydrogen-to-carbon (H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C), oxygen-to-carbon (O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C), and organic-mass-to-organic-carbon (OM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC) ratios. Two primary organic aerosol (POA) and two oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA) factors were identified by high-resolution positive matrix factorization (HR-PMF; Ulbrich et al., 2009; Paatero and Tapper, 1994). This study used the summation of the two OOA factors to represent secondary organic aerosols (SOAs). The mass spectra of the organic aerosol (OA) factors and their correlations with external species are shown in Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplement. The biomass-burning organic aerosol (BBOA) spectrum was characterized by abundant fragments of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 (mainly C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 73 (mainly C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with two indicators of biomass burning (Mohr et al., 2009). BBOA correlated well with C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.91) and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.90). Consistent with previous studies in Beijing (Xu et al., 2019), the PMF analysis revealed a mixed factor named fossil fuel organic aerosol (FFOA) which comprises traffic emissions and coal combustion and is characterized by a typical hydrocarbon ion series. FFOA had a relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.083) value, which was likely due to aging during regional transportation, similar to the results observed in the winter of 2016 in Beijing (Xu et al., 2019) and coal combustion organic aerosols in Gucheng (Chen et al., 2022). Secondary organic aerosol formation from volatile organic compound precursors could occur in different formation pathways, such as aqueous-phase, heterogeneous, or gas-phase reactions. It might also be oxidized under different conditions, such as oxidation under different nitrogen oxide conditions with different oxidation capacities and oxidants. The two resolved OOA factors displayed different spectral patterns, correlations with tracers, and diurnal variations, suggesting that they resulted from different chemical processes. However, their formation mechanisms remain to be explored in future studies. In general, the OOA factor 1 (OOA1) has higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (3.9) and O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C (0.91) ratios than OOA factor 2 (OOA2) with 2.1 and 0.78, respectively. The mass fraction (MF) of each chemical composition is calculated as the bulk mass fraction of each chemical composition in non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e740">This study did not consider losses in the inlet line and sampling systems for the following reasons: (1) investigated mixing-state parameters are represented by number fractions (NFs) of different diameters which are much less affected by losses in sampling systems compared with absolute number concentrations, and (2) good consistency was achieved between measurements of particle number size distributions (PNSDs) and mass concentrations measured by AMS. The average ratio between volume concentration derived from AMS and rBC measurements (densities of compounds are the same as Kuang et al., 2021) and the volume concentration derived from PNSD measurements was 0.79 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.97; as shown in Fig. S3), consistent with previous reports as AMS cannot detect aerosol components such as dust (Kuang et al., 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Aerosol mixing-state measurement techniques</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>DMA–CCNC measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e772">The CCN activity of the particles under supersaturated conditions was measured using a DMA–CCNC system, which consisted of a differential mobility analyzer (DMA; model 3081; TSI, Inc., MN, USA), condensation particle counter (CPC; model 3756; TSI, Inc., MN, USA), and continuous-flow CCNC (model CCN100; Droplet Measurement Technologies LLC, USA). The system was operated in size-scanning mode and provided the size-resolved particle activation ratio (SPAR) by combining CPC and CCNC measurements at different particle sizes. To compare the instruments, three supersaturations (SSs) of 0.08 %, 0.14 %, and 0.22 % were applied in a single cycle of approximately 15 min. CCN measurements under these three SSs revealed that the CCN activity of aerosols resides in the accumulation mode with an aerosol diameter range of approximately 100–200 nm, which is close to the diameters of the H(/V)TDMA measurements. Higher SSs would reveal CCN activities of smaller aerosol particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 nm) where the DMA–SP2 measurement is unavailable. The sample and sheath flow rates of DMA were set at 1 and 5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, resulting in a measured particle diameter range of 9–500 nm, with a running time of 5 min per cycle. Supersaturation in the CCNC was calibrated with monodisperse ammonium sulfate particles (Rose et al., 2008) before and after the campaign. The flow rates were also calibrated before and after the campaign and checked daily to minimize uncertainties in droplet counting and supersaturation formed in the column (Roberts and Nenes, 2005; Lance et al., 2006). SPAR deviations due to multiple-charge particles were corrected using a modified algorithm based on Hagen and Alofs (1983) and Deng et al. (2011). Further details regarding this system can be found in Ma et al. (2016) and Tao et al. (2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>H(/V)TDMA measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e802">The mixing state of the aerosols in terms of hygroscopicity and volatility was measured using a hygroscopicity/volatility tandem differential mobility analyzer (H(/V)TDMA; Tan et al., 2013). The H(/V)TDMA consisted of two DMA (model 3081 L; TSI Inc.), with the first DMA (DMA1) selecting dried particles without conditioning (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 %) and the second DMA (DMA2) selecting conditioned particles. H(/V)TDMA can operate in either the H or V mode and is controlled by a three-way solenoid valve. A Nafion humidifier was used in the H mode to condition the selected dry particles to 90 % RH equilibrium. The number–size distribution of humidified particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was measured using DMA2 and CPC (model 3772, TSI Inc.). The RH-dependent hygroscopic growth factor (GF) at a specific diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M52" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(RH) is the size of particles undergoing humidification. Four dry electrical mobility diameters (50, 100, 150, and 200 nm) were measured in this mode. The instrument was regularly calibrated using standard polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres and ammonium sulfate particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e878">In the V mode, a heated tube evaporated the volatile coatings from the previously selected dry particles. Six temperature settings were used for the heated tube, ranging from 25–200 °C. The number–size distributions of the heated particles were measured using DMA2 and CPC. In addition to the four particle sizes measured in the H mode, three additional particle sizes (250, 300, and 350 nm) were measured in the V mode (residence time inside the heated tube was about 1.6 s; Hong et al., 2017). The temperature-dependent shrinkage factor (SF), which is the ratio of the heated particle size to dry particle size without heating (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), is defined as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M55" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the particle diameter during heating. A complete cycle of H-mode measurements under one RH condition and V-mode measurements at six temperatures took approximately 3 h. The probability density function (PDF) of the GF (or SF) was calculated from the measured density function using the inversion algorithm described by Stolzenburg and McMurry (2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>DMA–SP2 measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e950">The size-resolved BC mixing states were measured using an SP2 (Droplet Measurement Technologies LLC, USA) after the DMA (model 3081, TSI, USA). The DMA selected aerosols of various dry particle sizes which were then introduced into SP2. The DMA–SP2 setup was able to measure the mixing states of aerosols with diameters (detection limit of approximately 80 nm based on the calibration) of 100, 120, 160, 200, 235, 270, 300, 335, 370, 400, 435, 470, 500, 535, 570, 600, 635, 670, and 700 nm within 20 min when it was not placed after a denuder–bypass switch system (during the following time periods on 13–24 October at 09:00 LT (local time; all instances of time in the text are given in local time) and from 09:00 on 5 November to 09:00 on 8 November). However, it only measured mixing states at diameters of 120, 160, 200, 250, 300, 400, and 500 nm when it was placed after a thermodenuder–bypass switch system (during the following time periods at 11:00 on 24 October to 08:00 on 5 November and at 09:00 on 8 November to 18:00 on 17 November). Because the HTDMA and VTDMA measurements were conducted solely by a single H(/V)TDMA system operating in different modes, the time needed for a single-particle size measurement of HTDMA and VTDMA was much longer than that of the DMA–SP2 system. Thus, for the same measurement cycle (2 h), more particle sizes were selected in the DMA–SP2 system to acquire the BC mass concentration and mixing state at larger diameters than HTDMA and VTDMA.</p>
      <p id="d1e953">The SP2 chamber had a continuous Nd:YAG laser beam with a wavelength of 1064 nm. The BC-containing particles passing through the laser beam become incandescent by absorbing radiation. The mass concentration of the BC was calculated by measuring the intensity of the emitted incandescent light. The sheath flow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sample flow ratio was maintained at 10 for the DMA to reduce the width of the diameter distribution of the selected monodisperse aerosols. Additionally, the flow rate of the SP2 was changed from 0.1 to 0.12 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> starting on 22 October (in the specification of SP2, the allowed flow rate range was  0.03–0.18 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). SP2 was calibrated using quadag soot particles, as reported by Gysel et al. (2011). Further details regarding the calibrations are provided in Sect. S1 in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Derivations of mixing-state parameters </title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Fitting SPAR curves measured by the DMA–CCNC system</title>
      <p id="d1e1003">The SPAR curves were parameterized using a sigmoidal function with three parameters. As shown in Fig. S4, a sigmoidal curve generally characterized the measured SPAR. This parameterization assumes that the aerosol is an external mixture of CCN-active hydrophilic and CCN-inactive hydrophobic particles (Rose et al., 2010). The formula used to parameterize the SPAR (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for a specific SS is as follows (Rose et al., 2008):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M61" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>MAF</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">erf</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where erf denotes the error function. The maximum activation fraction (MAF) is an asymptote of the measured SPAR curve for large particles, as shown in Fig. S4, representing the number fraction of CCN relative to the total number of particles. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the midpoint activation diameter, is linked to the hygroscopicity of the CCN, and indicates the diameter at which the SPAR equals half of the MAF value. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard deviation of the cumulative Gaussian distribution function and characterizes the heterogeneity of CCN hygroscopicity. In Fig. S4, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the slope of the steep increase in the SPAR curves when the diameter is close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Generally, hydrophilic particles larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can become CCN. Therefore, these three parameters can be used to characterize the hygroscopicity of these hydrophilic particles. This study did not consider the impact of nearly hydrophobic particles on SPAR, as deviations from this parameterization scheme due to this impact were negligible at low SSs, as stated in Tao et al. (2020).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Classification of particle type based on hygroscopicity or volatility</title>
      <p id="d1e1145">In this study, ambient aerosol particles were classified into two groups based on their hygroscopicity (hydrophobic and hydrophilic) and two groups based on their volatility (non-volatile and volatile) based on the measurements from H(/V)TDMA (Wehner et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016). Each group can be defined using the critical values of GF or SF as follows: hydrophobic population, where GF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; hydrophilic population, where GF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; non-volatile population, where SF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; and volatile population, where SF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1213">The critical values of GF (GF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and SF (SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in H(/V)TDMA depend on the particle size and working conditions, such as relative humidity and heating temperature. During this campaign, the SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was set to 0.85 for all seven measured particle sizes at a temperature of 200 °C. The GF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the four measured particle sizes of 50, 100, 150, and 200 nm were 1.1, 1.15, 1.175, and 1.2, respectively, and the corresponding hygroscopicity parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, was approximately 0.07. These values of GF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> divide the probability density functions (PDFs) of SF and GF into two modes, as shown in Fig. 2c, consistent with prior NCP studies (Liu et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016), and may be different from those GF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in other studies because of the difference in aerosol microphysical properties. The NF for the hydrophilic group (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and volatile group (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be calculated as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>GFPDF(GF) d GF</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mtext>SFPDF(SF) d SF</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where GFPDF and SFPDF are the PDFs of GF and SF, respectively, as derived from H(/V)TDMA measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Classification of particle type based on DMA–SP2 measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1381">BC-containing particles can be categorized into two groups based on coating thickness, namely bare-BC/thinly coated BC particles and thickly coated BC particles. For the measurement of coated-BC particles at SP2, the incandescence signal is generally detected later than the scattering signal, and the time difference between the occurrence of the peaks of the incandescence and scattering signals is defined as the lag time (Moteki and Kondo, 2007; Sedlacek et al., 2012; Subramanian et al., 2010). The coating thickness of BC-containing particles in the SP2 measurement can be indicated by the lag time (Moteki and Kondo, 2007; Schwarz et al., 2006; Sedlacek et al., 2012; Subramanian et al., 2010; Metcalf et al., 2012), which has exhibited a clear two-mode distribution in previous studies (Zhang et  al., 2018a; Zhao et al., 2022). A critical lag time threshold can be used to differentiate between the different types of BC-containing particles and calculate the NF of bare- and coated-BC particles in the total identified particles. In this study, a two-mode distribution of the lag time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was observed, and a critical value of 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to classify the BC-containing particles into thinly coated (or bare-) BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and thickly coated BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The definitions of all abbreviations are listed in Appendix A.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Campaign overview</title>
      <p id="d1e1476">The time series of the meteorological parameters, aerosol mixing-state measurements using different techniques, and mass concentrations of the aerosol chemical components are shown in Fig. 1. In detail, the measurements of aerosol mixing states include SPAR at an SS of 0.08 % by DMA–CCNC, GFPDF (PDF of GF) at 200 nm by HTDMA, SFPDF (PDF of SF) at 200 nm and 200 °C by VTDMA, and lag time PDF of 200 nm BC-containing particles by DMA–SP2. The secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA), SOA, POA, and BC mass concentrations are shown in Fig. 1b. Three periods with significantly different aerosol pollution conditions were identified during the campaign. As shown in Fig. 1b, before 23 October (moderately polluted period), the accumulation of aerosols led to SIA mass  concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the highest mass concentrations of SOA, POA, and BC all reached 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mass concentrations of different aerosol components increased significantly from 23 October to 6 November (heavily polluted period with an average non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration of 49.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and decreased to much lower levels after 6 November (clean period with a non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration of 5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Two particle groups were identified concerning the CCN activity, hygroscopicity, volatility, and coating thickness, as demonstrated by the SPAR, GFPDF, SFPDF, and lag time PDF of BC-containing particles. Significant variations in the aerosol mixing states were also observed during the three periods with different pollution conditions, as demonstrated by the variations in SFPDF measured by VTDMA. For example, the SF of the non-volatile particle group decreased during the  heavily polluted period. Aerosol mixing states may have changed because of various transformations in existing aerosol particles and distinct secondary formation processes under different pollution conditions (Kuang et al., 2020; Tao et al., 2021; Shi et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2022). Diurnal variations in the mass concentrations of different aerosol chemical components and mixing states can be observed in the variations in the SPAR measurements, as previously observed in this region (Liu et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2012; Kuang et al., 2015; Tao et al., 2020).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1597">Overview of the measurements during the campaign. <bold>(a)</bold> Meteorological parameters including wind speed (dots) and relative humidity (RH; black line), with the colors of the dots representing the wind direction. <bold>(b)</bold> Mass concentrations of aerosol chemical components including secondary inorganic aerosols (SIAs; red circle), secondary organic aerosols (SOAs; green plus), primary organic aerosols (POAs; blue cross) and black carbon (BC; black dots). <bold>(c)</bold> Size-resolved particle activation ratio (SPAR) under the supersaturation (SS) of 0.08 % observed by the DMA–CCNC, with warmer colors corresponding to higher values. <bold>(d)</bold> Probability density function (PDF) of the growth factor (GFPDF) at 200 nm observed by the HTDMA. <bold>(e)</bold> PDF of shrinkage factor (SFPDF) at 200 nm and 200 °C observed by the VTDMA. <bold>(f)</bold> PDF of lag time at 200 nm observed by DMA–SP2. The shaded blue, red, and green periods represent the three periods with moderate pollution, heavy pollution, and clean conditions, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1625">Figure 2 shows the campaign-averaged SPAR at the three SSs, PDF of the lag time of BC-containing particles, GFPDF, and SFPDF at 200 °C for different particle sizes. The sigmoidal SPAR curves were characterized by a rapid increase, followed by a gradual increase to unit 1, similar to the measured SPAR curves previously observed in this region (Deng et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2016; Tao et al., 2018). At lower SSs, the particle size required for CCN activation was larger; thus, rapid increases in the SPAR curves occurred at larger particle sizes, as expected. In addition, the maximum activation ratio of the SPAR curves decreases as fewer particles are CCN-active under low SSs. For the three measured SSs, the particle sizes where SPAR equals approximately 0.5 are approximately 90, 120, and 180 nm for the three SSs of 0.08 %, 0.14 %, and 0.22 %, respectively, consistent with the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Eq. 7) values of the campaign. The NF of CCN-active particles in large-diameter ranges (which varies with SS and, for example, is greater than 200 nm for 0.08 %) can be indicated by the gradual increase in the SPAR curves and quantified by the fitting parameter, MAF (see Eq. 7). The PDFs of the lag time, GF, and SF were all characterized by a bimodal distribution, which indicates two particle groups of BC-containing particles with different coating thicknesses, hygroscopicity, and volatility. The variations in the aerosol mixing states were further analyzed based on the measured mixing-state parameters.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1642">The campaign averages. <bold>(a)</bold> Size-resolved particle activation ratio (SPAR) curves measured by DMA–CCNC at the three supersaturations (SSs; represented by different colors and markers). <bold>(b)</bold> Probability density function (PDF) of lag time measured by DMA–SP2 at four particle sizes (represented by different colors and markers). <bold>(c)</bold> PDF of growth factor (GF) measured by HTDMA at four particle sizes (represented by different colors and markers). <bold>(d)</bold> PDF of shrinkage factor (SF) measured by VTDMA under the temperature of 200 °C at five particle sizes (represented by different colors and markers). The shaded areas indicate the standard deviations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Intercomparisons among aerosol mixing-state parameters derived using four techniques</title>
      <p id="d1e1671">The size-dependent characteristics of the aerosol mixing-state parameters derived from the measurements of the four techniques and the MFs of different aerosol chemical components during the three pollution periods are shown in Fig. 3. In general, the size-dependent characteristics of MAF, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were similar, suggesting that they were likely dominated by the same particle group, namely BC-free particles. This particle group had the highest number fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7) during the heavily polluted period and the lowest number fraction (down to 0.5) during the clean period, with the fraction decreasing with increasing particle size. This suggests that primary emissions tend to have higher number fractions of BC-containing particles in larger diameter ranges; for example, the number fraction of BC-containing particles increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 as the particle size increases from 200 to 500 nm during the clean period. Because the bulk aerosol MF is mostly contributed by particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 nm, there may have been more hydrophilic, volatile, CCN-active, and BC-free particles with larger sizes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 nm) during the heavily polluted period owing to strong SA formation in larger diameter ranges (Kuang et al., 2020), resulting in a higher NF of these particles compared to the clean period. As for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is defined as the number concentration ratio of externally mixed BC particles in the total BC-containing particles, the small size dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the moderately polluted period might have been associated with stronger primary emissions, while the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing particle diameter in the polluted period confirmed that SA formation is more efficient for particles with larger diameters.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1772"><bold>(a–c)</bold> Size dependence of MAF (green circle), NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue triangle), NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (yellow square), NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (red cross), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black cross) during the three periods. MAF is the maximum activation fraction, an asymptote of the measured size-resolved particle activation ratio (SPAR) curve at a large particle size. NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number fraction of hydrophilic aerosol whose hygroscopicity parameter is higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07. NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number fraction of volatile aerosol whose shrink factor at 200 °C is lower than 0.85. NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number fraction of black carbon (BC)-free particles. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number fraction of externally mixed BC particles in the total BC-containing particles. <bold>(d–f)</bold> Corresponding mass fractions (MFs) of aerosol chemical components (identified by colors) during the three periods, including secondary organic aerosols (SOAs), biomass-burning organic aerosol (BBOA), fossil fuel organic aerosols (FFOAs), and inorganic ions including sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and ammonium (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1898">As for the difference among the aerosol mixing-state parameters, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> agreed with each other with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 difference, and both were higher than NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by at least 0.1 in the moderately polluted period. Compared with NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher during the heavily polluted period when the nitrate mass fraction was the highest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %). The SOA mass fraction was the lowest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 %) among all three periods, suggesting that some BC-containing particles in this period were also identified as volatile, consistent with the fact that the formation of semi-volatile nitrate in BC-containing particles increases their volatility. However, during the clean period, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was even lower than NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that some BC-free particles were characterized as low-volatility, and non-negligible number fractions of BC-free particles dominated these less volatile aerosol components which were likely less volatile organic aerosols (not likely contributed by BC-containing particles with a BC smaller than the SP2 detection limit because this type of volatile BC-containing particle has an SF lower than 0.4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 nm/200 nm), which is substantially lower than the threshold SF of 0.85 for the NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation). In addition, the MAF values generally agreed with NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the clean period. However, they were larger than NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the moderately and heavily polluted periods (by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2) when the POA/SOA mass fractions were higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 %). POA generally has a lower hygroscopicity than SOA. The critical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of hydrophilic mode aerosols was 0.07, suggesting that a higher number fraction of aerosols had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> below 0.07 (i.e., hydrophobic mode aerosols in this study) during the moderately polluted period. However, under supersaturated conditions, they demonstrate enhanced hygroscopicity by becoming CCN-active. NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was consistently lower than NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (the average difference between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximately 0.2). As mentioned above, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was also lower than MAF during moderately polluted periods, and there may be a significant number fraction of volatile BC-free particles with hygroscopicity lower than the critical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.07; however, they were still CCN-active and therefore not fully hydrophobic.</p>
      <p id="d1e2120">The diurnal variations in MAF, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, along with the MFs of the aerosol chemical components during the three periods, are shown in Fig. 4. Except for a particle size of 50 nm, the diurnal variations in these four mixing-state parameters were generally similar for all measured sizes. The different diurnal variations at a particle size of 50 nm may be due to the different effects of emissions and aging processes on the different aerosol modes, as particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 nm mainly reside in the Aitken mode, while particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 nm mainly reside in the accumulation mode (Wang et al., 2022). For particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 nm (Figs. 4 and S5), there was a maximum in the afternoon for MAF, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating a peak during this time due to an increase in SA compositions, such as nitrate and SOA, and a decrease in POA and BC. Diurnal variations in the aerosol mixing-state parameters and chemical compositions were more pronounced during the moderately polluted period. During heavily polluted periods, the diurnal variation was least pronounced for NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and most pronounced for NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the clean-air period, there was another maximum at midnight for MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which may be attributed to the diurnal variations in SA compositions, such as sulfate and SOA, and the decrease in BC and FFOAs. The average size dependence of the aerosol mixing-state parameters over different time ranges during a heavily polluted period is shown in Fig. S6. It can be seen that the differences among the four parameters were the least from 12:00 to 18:00, with the most SOA and the least POA. This is consistent with the results shown in Fig. 3, where the difference between the MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased when the POA mass fractions were the smallest. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tended to be lower during the daytime, and its diurnal variation was more significant for larger particle sizes. In general, the diurnal variations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were opposite to those of NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and agreed better with those of the primary aerosol MFs. This is because BC particles originate from primary emissions and are mainly mixed externally. After aging in the atmosphere, BC particles can be coated by SAs, resulting in more coated BC particles and fewer externally mixed BC particles. As SAs tend to form on larger particles, the diurnal variations in SA formation may significantly affect the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of larger particle sizes.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2280"><bold>(a–l)</bold> Diurnal variations in the aerosol mixing-state parameters (identified by color and marker) at different particle sizes (50, 150, 200, and 300 nm) during the three periods. The shaded areas indicate the standard deviations. <bold>(m–o)</bold> Diurnal variations in the mass fractions (MFs) of aerosol chemical components, including secondary organic aerosols (SOAs), biomass-burning organic aerosol (BBOA), fossil fuel organic aerosols (FFOAs), and inorganic ions including sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and ammonium (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (identified by color and marker) during the three periods.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2321">As summarized in Table S1 in the Supplement, the comparison among MAF, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was conducted based on their correlations with different particle sizes. Note that the MAF at SSs of 0.08 %, 0.14 %, and 0.22 % was used for comparison at 200, 150, and 100 nm particle sizes. This is because the diameter range of rapid increases in the SPAR curves is determined by aerosol hygroscopicity in this particle size range. The midpoints of the rapidly increasing diameter ranges of the SPAR curves at SSs of 0.08 %, 0.14 %, and 0.22 % were approximately 180, 120, and 90 nm, respectively (as shown in Fig. 2). In general, there were moderate correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5) between MAF, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that a similar particle group contributed to the dominance of CCN-active, hygroscopic, and volatile aerosols (Zhang et al., 2016). The agreement between MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was slightly higher than that between MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In detail, compared to the other two, the agreement between MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has a similar correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.65) and a smaller systematic difference (slope and intercept were much closer to 1 and 0, respectively). This is consistent with the previous finding that a substantial number fraction of volatile but less hygroscopic aerosols is CCN-active. For smaller particle sizes, the correlation became weaker (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4), whereas the degree of reduction was the lowest for the correlation between MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.529).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Impacts of primary aerosol emissions on aerosol mixing-state and parameter intercomparisons</title>
      <p id="d1e2504">Figure 5 presents the correlation between each aerosol mixing-state parameter at 200 nm and the MF of each primary organic aerosol composition during the three periods. The four mixing-state parameters (MAF, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) were negatively correlated with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the anticorrelation with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.45 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.74) was much stronger than MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.45). Biomass-burning emissions and fossil fuel emissions are the two major sources of BC in the NCP (Yang et al., 2022), and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was negatively correlated with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.49) and weakly correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18) with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that fossil fuel emissions were likely the dominant source of BC during this field campaign. The negative correlation between MAF and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was weaker than that of NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.62 vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.49). In particular, at the same MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the MAF was lower than  NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, demonstrating that some BC-free particles were CCN-inactive and were likely mainly composed of organic aerosols from fossil fuel combustion emissions. The negative correlation between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was slightly weaker than between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.56 vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.49). At the same MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was close to NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and considering that BC-containing particles were dominated by thinly coated BC most of the time (Fig. 5), this demonstrates that the non-volatile population identified by VTDMA was mainly contributed by BC-containing particles. NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> had the lowest negative correlation with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.74), demonstrating significant contributions from fossil fuel emissions to nearly hydrophobic aerosol populations. At the same MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, for example, when conditions of MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 were met, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7) demonstrated a noticeable decrease compared to NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7), and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a negative correlation with both MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that a substantial portion of nearly hydrophobic particles originated from FFOA- or BBOA-dominant rather than BC-containing particles. Additionally, markedly different correlations were observed between MAF and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.62) and between MAF and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2), implying that nearly hydrophobic but CCN-active aerosols likely originated from biomass burning. The correlations between the ratio of thinly coated BC in the total BC-containing particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the MFs of BBOA and FFOA are shown in Fig. 6. Weak correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3) between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tended to increase with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that BC-containing particles emitted from fossil fuel combustion tended to be more externally mixed with other aerosol components than those emitted from biomass burning, which is consistent with the results of previous studies (Schwarz et al., 2008; Laborde et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2017; Y. Zhang et al., 2020). These results demonstrate remarkably different mixing states and the physicochemical properties of fossil fuel combustion and biomass-burning aerosols.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3073">The correlations between aerosol mixing-state parameters and mass fractions (MFs) of biomass-burning organic aerosol (BBOA) and fossil fuel organic aerosols (FFOAs) during different periods (moderately polluted period: – blue dot or circle; heavily polluted period – red cross or square; clean period – green plus or pentagon), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> representing the correlation coefficient.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3091">The correlations between the ratio of externally mixed black carbon (BC) in total BC particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mass fractions (MFs) of biomass-burning organic aerosol (BBOA) and fossil fuel organic aerosols (FFOAs) during different periods (moderately polluted period – blue dot; heavily polluted period – red cross; clean period – green plus), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> representing correlation coefficient.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3119">The impact of primary emissions on the differences among the four aerosol mixing-state parameters at a particle size of 200 nm was analyzed and is shown in Fig. 7. The difference between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and  NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was significantly positively correlated with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FFOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5), suggesting that a substantial proportion of POA resided in BC-free particles and was volatile but contributed substantially to nearly hydrophobic aerosols, as did the differences between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The MFs of BBOA and FFOAs were poorly correlated with the differences between the MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (MAF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (MAF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. S7). The difference between MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was positively correlated with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BBOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, further suggesting that BBOA contributed to nearly hydrophobic aerosols under subsaturated conditions; however, their hygroscopicity was enhanced, and they became CCN-active under supersaturated conditions. The enhanced hygroscopicity of BBOA under supersaturated conditions may be attributed to (1) the surface tension being lowered by surface-active organic solutes (Hodas et al., 2016; Ruehl et al., 2016), (2) liquid–liquid phase separation (Ovadnevaite et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018), (3) the dissolution of sparingly soluble compounds at higher saturated conditions (Wex et al., 2009; Dusek et al., 2011), and (4) highly viscous organic aerosol which takes up water by surface water adsorption under sub-saturated conditions and by absorption of water under supersaturated conditions (Pajunoja et al., 2015). The correlations between the mixing-state parameters and primary aerosol composition during the campaign and different pollution periods are summarized in Fig. S7.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3357">The correlations between the differences among the four aerosol mixing-state parameters at particle size 200 nm and mass fractions (MFs) of biomass-burning organic aerosol (BBOA) and fossil fuel organic aerosols (FFOAs) during different periods (moderately polluted period – blue circle; heavily polluted period – red square; clean period – green pentagon), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> representing correlation coefficient.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3373">In general, both field and laboratory studies have shown that primary organic aerosols from the combustion of biomass and fossil fuels are less hygroscopic. In the laboratory experiment, it is found that organic aerosols produced by fossil fuels have very low hygroscopicity, significantly less than 0.1 (Vu et al., 2015, 2017; Fofie et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018b; Mukherjee et al., 2021). Observations have also found that the organic aerosols associated with fossil fuel combustion have low hygroscopicity which may be due to the poorly water soluble substances in FFOAs (Qiu et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021). The aerosol composition produced by biomass burning is complex, with a large number of organic aerosols (BBOAs) and inorganic components being produced at the initial stage, making important contributions to CCN (Spracklen et al., 2011; Bougiatioti et al., 2016; Pöhlker et al., 2018). These primary organic aerosols (i.e., BBOA) are generally semi-volatile (May et al., 2013) and less hygroscopic (Engelhart et al., 2012; Hennigan et al., 2012); this has a negative contribution to the overall hygroscopicity (Bougiatioti et al., 2016; Kuang et al., 2020, 2021; Cai et al., 2022), resulting in weaker overall aerosol hygroscopicity in the initial stage of the biomass burning (Engelhart et al., 2012; Hennigan et al., 2012; Pöhlker et al., 2018). However, laboratory experiments found that BBOAs may contain organic substances with different hygroscopicity under different saturation ratios (Malek et al., 2022) and lead to the increased hygroscopicity and enhanced CCN activity of BBOAs under supersaturation conditions (Hersey et al., 2013). Our results generally agree with previous studies and provide evidence of the enhanced CCN activity of BBOA under supersaturation conditions in field campaigns. Furthermore, the different impacts of aerosols emitted from biomass burning and fossil fuel combustion on CCN are directly observed in this campaign using the newly developed advanced aerosol–cloud sampling system which show that biomass-burning aerosols are efficient CCN even under low supersaturations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 %); however, aerosols from fossil fuel combustion can only activate at higher supersaturations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14 %). These results suggest simultaneous measurements of aerosol GF distributions, SPAR curves, and BC mixing states, and their comparisons could provide novel insights into different synergistic hygroscopic, volatile, and activation properties of aerosols from different sources in the atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Impacts of SA formation on aerosol mixing-state and parameter intercomparisons</title>
      <p id="d1e3398">The correlations between the aerosol mixing-state parameters at 200 nm and the MF of each SA component are presented in Fig. 8 for three periods, and the entire campaign is presented. The analysis is conducted at only 200 nm, where all four aerosol mixing-state parameters were measured to compare the four aerosol mixing-state parameters and their relationships with aerosol chemical components simultaneously. Generally, MAF, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited strong positive correlations with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5). This is likely because ammonium was mainly formed through neutralizing sulfuric and nitric acids with ammonia; therefore, variations in ammonium better represent the overall secondary inorganic aerosol formation. As shown in Fig. 3, the secondary inorganic aerosol components dominated SA (the mass ratio between SIA and SA is approximately 70 %), indicating that SA formation was primarily composed of secondary inorganic aerosol formation, which explains the weaker correlation with SOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3), as shown in Fig. 8.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3479">The correlation between the four aerosol mixing-state parameters and the mass fraction (MF) of secondary aerosol (SA) components during different periods (moderately polluted period – blue dot or circle; heavily polluted period – red cross or square; clean period – green plus or pentagon), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> representing correlation coefficient. SA components include secondary organic aerosols (SOAs), sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and ammonium (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3522">During the clean-air period when the MFs of SOA and sulfate were both above 15 %, all four parameters had a strong positive correlation with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5), suggesting that when a clean background air mass with higher mass fractions of sulfate and SOA prevailed, the local primary emissions that contributed substantially to BC-containing and less hygroscopic POA aerosols became less significant. The positive correlations between the MAF and SA components have been extensively discussed by Tao et al. (2021), who found that SA formation enhances the hygroscopicity of nearly hydrophobic aerosols, thereby increasing CCN activity. This also explains the strong correlation between the NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or MAF and ammonium formation. The strong positive correlations between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SA formation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6) are consistent with the fact that nitrate dominates SA formation during this campaign and is semi-volatile. For the first time, strong positive correlations between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SA formation were observed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6). NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depends primarily on the relative variation between BC-containing and BC-free particles. The increase in NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at 200 nm as a function of the SA MF suggests that SAs migrated the higher mass fraction of BC-free particles with particle sizes smaller than 200 nm to particle sizes of 200 nm, suggesting that SAs tended to form more quickly on BC-free particles than on BC-containing particles with BC higher than SP2 detection limit. Recent studies reported that catalyst or photochemical reactions on BC particles can contribute the formation of secondary aerosols (F. Zhang et al., 2020, 2021). Our results may indicate that SA formation on BC particles might not be a significant pathway that contributes substantially to haze formation, and the underlying mechanisms need to be further resolved.</p>
      <p id="d1e3644">The effects of SA formation on the differences between the four aerosol mixing-state parameters were studied and are illustrated in Fig. 9. The two OOA factors (OOA1 and OOA2) were formed through different chemical pathways. The difference between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) showed a strong negative correlation with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (mainly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6), as did the differences between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Ammonium nitrate is a pure-scattering, semi-volatile component with strong hygroscopicity, and the increase in its mass fraction can enhance both aerosol volatility and hygroscopicity, therefore resulting in a smaller difference among NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3797">The correlation between the differences among the four aerosol mixing-state parameters and the mass fraction (MF) of secondary aerosol (SA) chemical components during different periods. OOA1 and OOA2 are two secondary organic aerosol (SOA) factors resolved from aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) measurements using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) technique. Moderately polluted period – blue circle; heavily polluted period – red square; clean period – green pentagon.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3806">Furthermore, the difference between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a positive correlation with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and a negative correlation with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating the different volatility and hygroscopicity of the two SOA factors. The differences between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concerning the MF of OOA1 and OOA2 are shown in Fig. 9e and f, respectively. As previously noted, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was generally higher than NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the difference between the two decreased with increasing MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which was generally smaller than 0.3. This suggests that the formation of OOA1 enhances the hygroscopicity of volatile particles, which aligns with the highest oxidation state of OOA1 (higher O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C but lower H <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C compared to OOA2) and has a significant and overall positive impact on aerosol hygroscopicity (Cerully et al., 2015; Thalman et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2023). A positive correlation was observed between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25).</p>
      <p id="d1e3957">In contrast, the correlation between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was weak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was close to 0), implying that OOA2 might be semi-volatile but only weakly hygroscopic, which could contribute to NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> being higher than NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as OOA2 increases. The difference between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was negatively correlated with MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is consistent with the semi-volatile nature of nitrate. The negative correlation between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates that the difference is smaller when there is more OOA2, implying that OOA2 is also a semi-volatile compound and is likely formed mainly on BC-free particles (particles with BC mass lower than detection limit are not excluded). The correlations between the differences between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAF and the MF of each SA composition were very weak. The impacts of SA formation on BC mixing states are shown in Fig. S8. In general, the NF of thinly coated BC has a negative correlation with SIA and a weak association with SOA, suggesting that SIA formation mainly enhances the thickness of the BC coating. The correlations between the mixing-state parameters and SA composition during the campaign and different pollution periods are summarized in Fig. S9. Our results on OOA agree with previous studies in which OOA is reported to be volatile (Kim et al., 2020; Cai et al., 2022) but can have a positive or negative impact on hygroscopicity, depending on its oxidation level (Kim et al., 2020; Kuang et al., 2021; Cai et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e4134">In addition to changes in the MFs of SA compositions, the accumulation of SA pollution may provide insights into the impact of SA formation on aerosol mixing states. As shown in Fig. 10a, during the heavily polluted periods, there were two distinct pollution accumulation processes from 23 to 27 October and from 28 to 31 October, respectively. During the pollution accumulation process, the mass concentration of SAs increased approximately 3-fold, indicating the rapid formation of secondary compositions and a significant increase in the NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentration. Figure 10b and c illustrate that this increase in SAs significantly enlarged the value of aerosol mixing-state parameters, including MAF, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which increased from approximately 0.5 to 0.8 with evident diurnal variations. This highlights the impact of SA formation on the aerosol mixing states and the importance of studying the pollution accumulation processes of SAs. The enhancements in the different aerosol mixing-state parameters during the pollution accumulation process were not uniform. MAF and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> initially exhibited lower values than NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, their later enhancement was stronger than that of NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 10d and e show the difference between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at 200 and 300 nm as a function of SA mass concentrations during these two pollution periods, which clearly shows how, during SA formation, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> became higher than NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> while NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> remained close to the NF of thickly coated BC-containing particles (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) plus NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). These results suggest that SA formation increases the volatility of BC-free and BC-containing particles, leading to an increased NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Almost all BC-free particles and some BC-containing particles become volatile during the accumulation of pollution.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e4321">Variations in different aerosol mixing-state parameters during the pollution accumulation process. <bold>(a)</bold> The time series of mass concentrations of non-refractory PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NR-PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), secondary aerosols (SAs) (including inorganic ions and secondary organic aerosols, SOA), primary organic aerosols (POAs), and black carbon (BC) (identified by colors and markers). <bold>(b, c)</bold> The variations in the different aerosol mixing-state parameters (identified by colors and markers) at particle sizes of 200 nm <bold>(b)</bold> and 300 nm <bold>(c)</bold>. <bold>(d, e)</bold> The variations in the difference between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; blue large circle) and the difference between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; yellow small circle) with the mass concentration of SA at particle sizes of 200 nm <bold>(d)</bold> and 300 nm <bold>(e)</bold> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Number fraction of thickly coated black carbon (BC) particles.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/9131/2024/acp-24-9131-2024-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4509">The aerosol mixing state is one of the most important physicochemical properties of aerosol particles and significantly affects their optical properties and the CCN activity of aerosol particles. The aerosol mixing states vary significantly with complex aerosol emissions and atmospheric transformations. In this study, aerosol mixing states derived from CCN activity, hygroscopicity, volatility, and BC particle observations, along with their relationship to primary aerosol emissions and SA formation, were systematically analyzed based on simultaneous measurements of CCNC, H(/V)TDMA, and SP2. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the NFs of CCN-active, hygroscopic, and volatile particles were generally positively correlated and mainly contributed by BC-free particles. Therefore, four mixing-state parameters were all negatively correlated to either the MFs of BBOA or FFOAs because fossil fuel combustion and biomass burning were the two major sources of BC-containing particles during this field campaign. However, the differences between these mixing-state parameters varied significantly under different conditions and have shed new insights into aerosol physical and chemical properties – and even secondary aerosol formation mechanisms.</p>
      <p id="d1e4512">Fossil fuel combustion and biomass-burning emissions represent two major primary sources of global aerosol burden and are dominant primary aerosol sources in this campaign. It is known that the chemical compositions of both these primary sources are dominated by organics and BC. However, the intercomparison results among instruments revealed significant differences in the physical and chemical properties of aerosols emitted from these two sources. The combination of HTDMA, DMA–SP2, and aerosol source apportionment confirmed that substantial portions of BC-free aerosols from both biomass burning and fossil fuel combustion are nearly hydrophobic under sub-saturated conditions. Additionally, BC from fossil fuel combustion tends to be more externally mixed with other aerosol compositions than those from biomass burning. However, additional insights from DMA–CCNC measurements revealed that substantial portions of BC-free aerosols, nearly hydrophobic from biomass burning, could serve as CCN, while a substantial portion of those from fossil fuel combustion could not. Previous studies have confirmed the hygroscopicity difference in the aerosols from biomass burning under sub- and supersaturated conditions in laboratory settings; however, such differences have rarely been confirmed in field measurements. Moreover, comparisons between sub- and supersaturated conditions for aerosols from fossil fuel combustion have rarely been undertaken, even in laboratory studies. This finding is quite important because the ability of primary organic aerosols from biomass burning and fossil fuel combustion is often treated the same way in models (P. Liu et al., 2021; Pöhlker et al., 2023).</p>
      <p id="d1e4515">Secondary aerosol formation substantially alters the aerosol mixing state. The different variations in mixing-state parameters can also help reveal mechanisms of secondary aerosol formation. For example, the two resolved SOA factors exhibited different impacts on the differences between NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and their correlations with NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> revealed that OOA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was more hygroscopic but less volatile, suggesting distinct formation mechanisms for these two OOA factors. Further analysis might help link SOA formation mechanisms to aerosol physical properties, which is important for connecting aerosol chemistry to aerosol climate effects determined by aerosol physicochemical properties. Additionally, variations in size-resolved NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> revealed that secondary organic and inorganic aerosol formations led to the migration of BC-free particles towards larger diameters more quickly than that of BC-containing particles. This phenomenon is more likely to occur when aqueous pathways dominate secondary aerosol formation because BC-containing particles generally exhibit weak hygroscopicity and do not favor aqueous processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e4598">The findings of this study highlight the markedly different effects of primary emissions and SA formation on aerosol mixing states and suggest that comparisons of aerosol mixing states obtained using various techniques are useful for gaining insights into the hygroscopicity, volatility, and CCN activity of different aerosols. The following recommendations are listed for future studies based on the findings of this study: (1) when exploring the impact of aerosol emissions and secondary aerosol formation on aerosol hygroscopicity under sub- and supersaturated conditions, we recommend employing simultaneous DMA–SP2 measurements to better represent BC characteristics. (2) Simultaneous DMA–CCNC, H(/V)TDMA, and DMA–SP2 measurements could enhance studies on secondary aerosol formation mechanisms. Conversely, if formation mechanisms and pathways are clear, then these measurements could elucidate how secondary aerosol formation impacts aerosol physical properties from different aspects. (3) Caution is advised in the application of aerosol mixing-state parameters from H(/V)TDMA when conducting aerosol optical property investigations because the suitability of the H(/V)TDMA-derived mixing-state parameters for representing BC mixing states is largely dependent on the composition and mass of the secondary aerosols, and DMA–SP2 measurements are recommended for this purpose.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Definition and description of abbreviations</title>
      <p id="d1e4613"><table-wrap id="Taba" position="anchor"><oasis:table><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="2.3cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="6cm"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abbreviation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Full name and/or definition</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BBOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Biomass-burning organic aerosol –   characterized by obvious <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60  (mainly C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 73 (mainly  C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which are two  indicators of biomass burning</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Midpoint activation diameter – linked  to the hygroscopicity of CCN</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particle diameter under dry conditions  without humidification or heating</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particle diameter after humidification   or heating</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FFOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fossil fuel organic aerosol (FFOA) is  comprised of traffic emissions and  coal combustion and characterized by  a typical hydrocarbon ion series with  a relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Growth factor – the ratio between   particles with and without  humidification and linked to  aerosol hygroscopicity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hygroscopicity parameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mass fraction</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MAF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maximum activation fraction –   an asymptote of the measured SPAR   curve at large particle sizes and  represents the number fraction of   CCN to total particles</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number fraction of hydrophilic  aerosol whose hygroscopicity  parameter is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 at particle sizes  of 50, 100, 150, and 200 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number fraction of volatile aerosol  whose shrinkage factor at 200 °C is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.85 at particle sizes of 50, 100, 150,  and 200 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number fraction of black carbon  (BC)-free particles at particle sizes of  200, 250, 300, and 370 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number fraction of thickly coated BC  particles at particle sizes of 200, 250,  300, and 370 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>   (NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAF, NF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">noBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MAF)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The difference between the number  fraction of A and B at particle sizes  of 200 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p>
      <p id="d1e5126"><table-wrap id="Tabb" position="anchor"><oasis:table><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="1.6cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="6.5cm"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OOA1 and OOA2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Two OOA factors resolved from the PMF  analysis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PDF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Probability distribution function</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particulate matter with an aerodynamic  diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particulate matter with an aerodynamic  diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary organic aerosol – summation  of BBOA and FFOA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The number concentration ratio of  externally mixed BC particles in the total  BC-containing particles – externally  mixed BC particles are defined as  bare/thinly coated BC-containing  particles at particle sizes of 200, 250, 300, and 370 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Secondary aerosol, including nitrate,  sulfate, ammonium, and the two OOA factors</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shrinkage factor – the ratio between  particles with and without heating and is  linked to aerosol volatility</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SIA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Secondary inorganic aerosol, including nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Secondary organic aerosol, including  the two OOA factors</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SPAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Size-resolved particle activation ratio  – size-dependent CCN activity under  a specific SS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5344">The data used in this study are available from the corresponding authors, Ye Kuang (kuangye@jnu.edu.cn) and Li Liu (liul@gd121.cn), upon request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5347">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9131-2024-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9131-2024-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5356">YK and WaX planned this campaign, and YK designed the aerosol experiments and conceived this research, together with JT​​​​​​​. JT wrote the paper and performed measurements of CCNC. BL performed measurements of SP2 and analyzed SP2 datasets with the help of GaZ. WeX and YS​​​​​​​ performed AMS measurements. LL performed H(/V)TDMA measurements and conducted post-data processing, as well as some data analysis. BX, HX, MZ, HZ, and SR participated in this campaign and helped with instrument maintenance. GaZ provided full support for the campaign. All authors contributed to the discussions and revisions of this paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5362">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e5368">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5374">We would like to express our deepest gratitude to Wusan Zhou, the cook of this site, for his unwavering support during the challenging times of this campaign. His culinary talents not only nourished us physically but also provided moments of joy and comfort, making the difficult days more bearable. His dedication and delicious meals were a source of strength for the entire team, for which we are truly thankful.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5379">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42175083, 42175127, and 42275066), the Guangzhou Science and Information Technology Bureau Project (grant no. 2023A04J0941), the Guangdong Provincial Key Research and Development Program (grant no. 2020B1111360003), and the Science and Technology Innovation Team Plan of Guangdong Meteorological Bureau (grant no. GRMCTD202003).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5385">This paper was edited by Urs Baltensperger and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Sedlacek, A. J., Kleinman, L., Chand, D., Hubbe, J. M., and Buseck, P. R.: Volume changes upon heating of aerosol particles from biomass burning using transmission electron microscopy, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 46–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1373181" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2017.1373181</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Sedlacek, A. J., Kleinman, L., Springston, S. R., Wang, J., Chand, D., Hubbe, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Onasch, T. B., Kinase, T., Sakata, K., Takahashi, Y., and Buseck, P. R.: Spherical tarball particles form through rapid chemical and physical changes of organic matter in biomass-burning smoke, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 19336–19341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900129116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1900129116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kaercher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U., Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C. S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bougiatioti, A., Bezantakos, S., Stavroulas, I., Kalivitis, N., Kokkalis, P., Biskos, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Papayannis, A., and Nenes, A.: Biomass-burning impact on CCN number, hygroscopicity and cloud formation during summertime in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7389–7409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7389-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7389-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cai, M., Tan, H., Chan, C. K., Mochida, M., Hatakeyama, S., Kondo, Y., Schurman, M. I., Xu, H., Li, F., Shimada, K., Li, L., Deng, Y., Yai, H., Matsuki, A., Qin, Y., and Zhao, J.: Comparison of Aerosol Hygroscopcity, Volatility, and Chemical Composition between a Suburban Site in the Pearl River Delta Region and a Marine Site in Okinawa, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 17, 3194–3208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0020</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cai, M., Huang, S., Liang, B., Sun, Q., Liu, L., Yuan, B., Shao, M., Hu, W., Chen, W., Song, Q., Li, W., Peng, Y., Wang, Z., Chen, D., Tan, H., Xu, H., Li, F., Deng, X., Deng, T., Sun, J., and Zhao, J.: Measurement report: Distinct size dependence and diurnal variation in organic aerosol hygroscopicity, volatility, and cloud condensation nuclei activity at a rural site in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8117–8136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8117-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-8117-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H., Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K. R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cerully, K. M., Bougiatioti, A., Hite Jr., J. R., Guo, H., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Weber, R., and Nenes, A.: On the link between hygroscopicity, volatility, and oxidation state of ambient and water-soluble aerosols in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8679–8694, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8679-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8679-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C., Qiu, Y., Xu, W., He, Y., Li, Z., Sun, J., Ma, N., Xu, W., Pan, X., Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Sun, Y.: Primary Emissions and Secondary Aerosol Processing During Wintertime in Rural Area of North China Plain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035430" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD035430</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Miyakawa, T., Komazaki, Y., and Kuwata, M.: Secondary aerosol formation promotes water uptake by organic-rich wildfire haze particles in equatorial Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7781–7798, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7781-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7781-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y. F., Su, H., Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Berghof, M., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Gong, Y. G., Shao, M., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Zhang, Y. H., Carmichael, G. R., Wiedensohler, A., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Size-resolved measurement of the mixing state of soot in the megacity Beijing, China: diurnal cycle, aging and parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4477–4491, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4477-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4477-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ching, J., Fast, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Metrics to quantify the importance of mixing state for CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7445–7458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Ching, J., Adachi, K., Zaizen, Y., Igarashi, Y., and Kajino, M.: Aerosol mixing state revealed by transmission electron microscopy pertaining to cloud formation and human airway deposition, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 2, 22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0081-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-019-0081-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Deng, Z. Z., Zhao, C. S., Ma, N., Liu, P. F., Ran, L., Xu, W. Y., Chen, J., Liang, Z., Liang, S., Huang, M. Y., Ma, X. C., Zhang, Q., Quan, J. N., Yan, P., Henning, S., Mildenberger, K., Sommerhage, E., Schäfer, M., Stratmann, F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Size-resolved and bulk activation properties of aerosols in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3835–3846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3835-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3835-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Deng, Z. Z., Zhao, C. S., Ma, N., Ran, L., Zhou, G. Q., Lu, D. R., and Zhou, X. J.: An examination of parameterizations for the CCN number concentration based on in situ measurements of aerosol activation properties in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6227–6237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6227-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-6227-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Massling, A., Zeromskiene, K., Iinuma, Y., Schmid, O., Helas, G., Hennig, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Andreae, M. O.: Water uptake by biomass burning aerosol at sub- and supersaturated conditions: closure studies and implications for the role of organics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9519–9532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9519-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9519-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The ”dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Engelhart, G. J., Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity of fresh primary and aged biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7285–7293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B.: Modeling the Processing of Aerosol and Trace Gases in Clouds and Fogs, Chem. Rev., 115, 4157–4198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5005887</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Farmer, D. K., Cappa, C. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Atmospheric Processes and Their Controlling Influence on Cloud Condensation Nuclei Activity, Chem. Rev., 115, 4199–4217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006292" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006292</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward Reduced Representation of Mixing State for Simulating Aerosol Effects on Climate, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 971–980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Fofie, E. A., Donahue, N. M., and Asa-Awuku, A.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity and droplet formation of primary and secondary organic aerosol mixtures, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 242–251, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1392480" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2017.1392480</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Fu, Y., Peng, X., Sun, W., Hu, X., Wang, D., Yang, Y., Guo, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, G., Zhu, J., Ou, J., Shi, Z., Wang, X., and Bi, X.: Impact of Cloud Process in the Mixing State and Microphysical Properties of Soot Particles: Implications in Light Absorption Enhancement, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD037169</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gysel, M., Laborde, M., Olfert, J. S., Subramanian, R., and Gröhn, A. J.: Effective density of Aquadag and fullerene soot black carbon reference materials used for SP2 calibration, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2851–2858, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2851-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-2851-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hagen, D. E. and Alofs, D. J.: Linear Inversion Method to Obtain Aerosol Size Distributions from Measurements with a Differential Mobility Analyzer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 2, 465–475, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828308958650" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786828308958650</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Westervelt, D. M., Riipinen, I., Engelhart, G. J., Lee, T., Collett Jr., J. L., Pandis, S. N., Adams, P. J., and Robinson, A. L.: New particle formation and growth in biomass burning plumes: An important source of cloud condensation nuclei, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050930" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL050930</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Herich, H., Kammermann, L., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Lohmann, U., and Cziczo, D. J.: In situ determination of atmospheric aerosol composition as a function of hygroscopic growth, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D16213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009954" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009954</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Herich, H., Kammermann, L., Friedman, B., Gross, D. S., Weingartner, E., Lohmann, U., Spichtinger, P., Gysel, M., Baltensperger, U., and Cziczo, D. J.: Subarctic atmospheric aerosol composition: 2. Hygroscopic growth properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D13204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011574" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011574</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hersey, S. P., Craven, J. S., Metcalf, A. R., Lin, J., Lathem, T., Suski, K. J., Cahill, J. F., Duong, H. T., Sorooshian, A., Jonsson, H. H., Shiraiwa, M., Zuend, A., Nenes, A., Prather, K. A., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Composition and hygroscopicity of the Los Angeles Aerosol: CalNex, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 3016–3036, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50307" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50307</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hodas, N., Zuend, A., Schilling, K., Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Discontinuities in hygroscopic growth below and above water saturation for laboratory surrogates of oligomers in organic atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12767–12792, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12767-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12767-2016</ext-link>, 2016.​​​​​​​</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hong, J., Äijälä, M., Häme, S. A. K., Hao, L., Duplissy, J., Heikkinen, L. M., Nie, W., Mikkilä, J., Kulmala, M., Prisle, N. L., Virtanen, A., Ehn, M., Paasonen, P., Worsnop, D. R., Riipinen, I., Petäjä, T., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Estimates of the organic aerosol volatility in a boreal forest using two independent methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4387–4399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4387-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4387-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 49–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868200410840</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, X., Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Hong, J., and Ma, N.: Mathematical derivation and physical interpretation of particle size-resolved activation ratio based on particle hygroscopicity distribution: Application on global characterization of CCN activity, Atmos. Environ., 246, 118137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118137</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Jurányi, Z., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M., Laborde, M., Gomes, L., Roberts, G., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Hygroscopic mixing state of urban aerosol derived from size-resolved cloud condensation nuclei measurements during the MEGAPOLI campaign in Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6431–6446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6431-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-6431-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kawana, K., Nakayama, T., and Mochida, M.: Hygroscopicity and CCN activity of atmospheric aerosol particles and their relation to organics: Characteristics of urban aerosols in Nagoya, Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 4100–4121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd023213</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kim, N., Yum, S. S., Park, M., Park, J. S., Shin, H. J., and Ahn, J. Y.: Hygroscopicity of urban aerosols and its link to size-resolved chemical composition during spring and summer in Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11245–11262, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11245-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11245-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., Zhao, C. S., Tao, J. C., and Ma, N.: Diurnal variations of aerosol optical properties in the North China Plain and their influences on the estimates of direct aerosol radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5761–5772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5761-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5761-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., He, Y., Xu, W., Yuan, B., Zhang, G., Ma, Z., Wu, C., Wang, C., Wang, S., Zhang, S., Tao, J., Ma, N., Su, H., Cheng, Y., Shao, M., and Sun, Y.: Photochemical Aqueous-Phase Reactions Induce Rapid Daytime Formation of Oxygenated Organic Aerosol on the North China Plain, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 3849–3860, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06836" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b06836</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., Huang, S., Xue, B., Luo, B., Song, Q., Chen, W., Hu, W., Li, W., Zhao, P., Cai, M., Peng, Y., Qi, J., Li, T., Wang, S., Chen, D., Yue, D., Yuan, B., and Shao, M.: Contrasting effects of secondary organic aerosol formations on organic aerosol hygroscopicity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10375–10391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10375-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-10375-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M. and Kondo, Y.: Dependence of size-resolved CCN spectra on the mixing state of nonvolatile cores observed in Tokyo, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D19202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009761" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009761</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M., Kondo, Y., Mochida, M., Takegawa, N., and Kawamura, K.: Dependence of CCN activity of less volatile particles on the amount of coating observed in Tokyo, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D11207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007758" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007758</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Laborde, M., Crippa, M., Tritscher, T., Jurányi, Z., Decarlo, P. F., Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., and Gysel, M.: Black carbon physical properties and mixing state in the European megacity Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5831–5856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Langridge, J. M., Bahreini, R., Cappa, C. D., Middlebrook, A. M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Brown carbon and internal mixing in biomass burning particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 14802–14807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1206575109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation> Lance, S., Nenes, A., Medina, J., and Smith, J. N.: Mapping the operation of the DMT continuous flow CCN counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech. 40, 242–254, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Lance, S., Raatikainen, T., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Yu, X.-Y., Alexander, M. L., Stolzenburg, M. R., McMurry, P. H., Smith, J. N., and Nenes, A.: Aerosol mixing state, hygroscopic growth and cloud activation efficiency during MIRAGE 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5049–5062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5049-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5049-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Lata, N. N., Zhang, B., Schum, S., Mazzoleni, L., Brimberry, R., Marcus, M. A., Cantrell, W. H., Fialho, P., Mazzoleni, C., and China, S.: Aerosol Composition, Mixing State, and Phase State of Free Tropospheric Particles and Their Role in Ice Cloud Formation, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 3499–3510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00315" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00315</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Lee, A. K. Y., Rivellini, L.-H., Chen, C.-L., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha, R., Russell, L. M., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Influences of Primary Emission and Secondary Coating Formation on the Particle Diversity and Mixing State of Black Carbon Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 9429–9438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b03064</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Li, G., Su, H., Ma, N., Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Wang, Q., Hong, J., Zhang, Y., Kuhn, U., and Zhang, S.: Multiphase chemistry experiment in Fogs and Aerosols in the North China Plain (McFAN): integrated analysis and intensive winter campaign 2018, Faraday Discuss., 226, 207–222, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Joshi, R., Wang, J., Yu, C., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Flynn, M. J., Xie, C., Lee, J., Squires, F., Kotthaus, S., Grimmond, S., Ge, X., Sun, Y., and Fu, P.: Contrasting physical properties of black carbon in urban Beijing between winter and summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6749–6769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Li, S., Hu, D., Kong, S., Cheng, Y., Wu, Y., Ding, S., Hu, K., Zheng, S., Yan, Q., Zheng, H., Zhao, D., Tian, P., Ye, J., Huang, M., and Ding, D.: Evolution of Aerosol Optical Properties from Wood Smoke in Real Atmosphere Influenced by Burning Phase and Solar Radiation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 5677–5688, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07569" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c07569</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Liu, P., Song, M., Zhao, T., Gunthe, S. S., Ham, S., He, Y., Qin, Y. M., Gong, Z., Amorim, J. C., Bertram, A. K., and Martin, S. T.: Resolving the mechanisms of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nuclei activity for organic particulate matter, Nat. Commun., 9, 4076, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06622-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-06622-2</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Liu, P., Kaplan, J. O., Mickley, L. J., Li, Y., Chellman, N. J., Arienzo, M. M., Kodros, J. K., Pierce, J. R., Sigl, M., Freitag, J., Mulvaney, R., Curran, M. A. J., and McConnell, J. R.: Improved estimates of preindustrial biomass burning reduce the magnitude of aerosol climate forcing in the Southern Hemisphere, Science Advances, 7, eabc1379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc1379" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abc1379</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Liu, K., Zhang, C., Cheng, Y., Liu, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, G., Sun, X., and Mu, Y.: Serious BTEX pollution in rural area of the North China Plain during winter season, J. Environ. Sci., 30, 186–190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.05.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2014.05.056</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Liu, P. F., Zhao, C. S., Göbel, T., Hallbauer, E., Nowak, A., Ran, L., Xu, W. Y., Deng, Z. Z., Ma, N., Mildenberger, K., Henning, S., Stratmann, F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Hygroscopic properties of aerosol particles at high relative humidity and their diurnal variations in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3479–3494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3479-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3479-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Luo, B., Kuang, Y., Huang, S., Song, Q., Hu, W., Li, W., Peng, Y., Chen, D., Yue, D., Yuan, B., and Shao, M.: Parameterizations of size distribution and refractive index of biomass burning organic aerosol with black carbon content, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12401–12415, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12401-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-12401-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Ma, N., Zhao, C. S., Müller, T., Cheng, Y. F., Liu, P. F., Deng, Z. Z., Xu, W. Y., Ran, L., Nekat, B., van Pinxteren, D., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Herrmann, H., Yan, P., Zhou, X. J., and Wiedensohler, A.: A new method to determine the mixing state of light absorbing carbonaceous using the measured aerosol optical properties and number size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2381–2397, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2381-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2381-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Ma, N., Zhao, C., Tao, J., Wu, Z., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Größ, J., Liu, H., Bian, Y., Kuang, Y., Teich, M., Spindler, G., Müller, K., van Pinxteren, D., Herrmann, H., Hu, M., and Wiedensohler, A.: Variation of CCN activity during new particle formation events in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8593–8607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8593-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-8593-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Malek, K. A., Gohil, K., Al-Abadleh, H. A., and Asa-Awuku, A. A.: Hygroscopicity of polycatechol and polyguaiacol secondary organic aerosol in sub- and supersaturated water vapor environments, Environmental Science: Atmospheres, 2, 24–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ea00063b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d1ea00063b</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Matsui, H., Hamilton, D. S., and Mahowald, N. M.: Black carbon radiative effects highly sensitive to emitted particle size when resolving mixing-state diversity, Nat. Commun., 9, 3446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05635-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-05635-1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>May, A. A., Levin, E. J. T., Hennigan, C. J., Riipinen, I., Lee, T., Collett Jr., J. L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol emissions: 3. Biomass burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11327–11338, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50828</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Mei, F., Hayes, P. L., Ortega, A., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., Gilman, J., Kuster, W., de Gouw, J., Jimenez, J. L., and Wang, J.: Droplet activation properties of organic aerosols observed at an urban site during CalNex-LA, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2903–2917, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50285</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Metcalf, A. R., Craven, J. S., Ensberg, J. J., Brioude, J., Angevine, W., Sorooshian, A., Duong, H. T., Jonsson, H. H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Black carbon aerosol over the Los Angeles Basin during CalNex, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017255" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017255</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.: Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Moffet, R. C., O'Brien, R. E., Alpert, P. A., Kelly, S. T., Pham, D. Q., Gilles, M. K., Knopf, D. A., and Laskin, A.: Morphology and mixing of black carbon particles collected in central California during the CARES field study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14515–14525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14515-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14515-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, C., Huffman, J. A., Cubison, M. J., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S., Kimmel, J. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Hannigan, M., and Jimenez, J. L.: Characterization of Primary Organic Aerosol Emissions from Meat Cooking, Trash Burning, and Motor Vehicles with High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry and Comparison with Ambient and Chamber Observations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2443–2449, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8011518" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es8011518</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Moteki, N. and Kondo, Y.: Effects of Mixing State on Black Carbon Measurements by Laser-Induced Incandescence, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 398–417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701199728" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820701199728</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Mukherjee, S., Anil Kumar, V., Patil, R. D., Meena, G. S., Buchunde, P., Waghmare, V., Deshmukh, S., Dhavale, V., Ray, A., Panicker, A. S., Sonbawne, S. M., Safai, P. D., and Pandithurai, G.: Investigation of physico-chemical characteristics and associated CCN activation for different combustion sources through Chamber experiment approach, Atmos. Environ., 266, 118726, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118726</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Nordmann, S., Cheng, Y. F., Carmichael, G. R., Yu, M., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Zhang, Q., Saide, P. E., Pöschl, U., Su, H., Birmili, W., and Wiedensohler, A.: Atmospheric black carbon and warming effects influenced by the source and absorption enhancement in central Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12683–12699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12683-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12683-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Ovadnevaite, J., Zuend, A., Laaksonen, A., Sanchez, K. J., Roberts, G., Ceburnis, D., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Hodas, N., Facchini, M. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and O'Dowd, C.: Surface tension prevails over solute effect in organic-influenced cloud droplet activation, Nature, 546, 637–641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22806" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature22806</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values, Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/env.3170050203</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Pajunoja, A., Lambe, A. T., Hakala, J., Rastak, N., Cummings, M. J., Brogan, J. F., Hao, L., Paramonov, M., Hong, J., Prisle, N. L., Malila, J., Romakkaniemi, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kulmala, M., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Donahue, N. M., Riipinen, I., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., Petäjä, T., and Virtanen, A.:, 2015. Adsorptive uptake of water by semisolid secondary organic aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3063–3068, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063142</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D. R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1602310113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Pöhlker, M. L., Ditas, F., Saturno, J., Klimach, T., Hrabě de Angelis, I., Araùjo, A. C., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Cheng, Y., Chi, X., Ditz, R., Gunthe, S. S., Holanda, B. A., Kandler, K., Kesselmeier, J., Könemann, T., Krüger, O. O., Lavrič, J. V., Martin, S. T., Mikhailov, E., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Rizzo, L. V., Rose, D., Su, H., Thalman, R., Walter, D., Wang, J., Wolff, S., Barbosa, H. M. J., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., and Pöhlker, C.: Long-term observations of cloud condensation nuclei over the Amazon rain forest – Part 2: Variability and characteristics of biomass burning, long-range transport, and pristine rain forest aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10289–10331, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10289-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10289-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Pöhlker, M. L., Pöhlker, C., Quaas, J., Mülmenstädt, J., Pozzer, A., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Block, K., Coe, H., Ervens, B., Gallimore, P., Gaston, C. J., Gunthe, S. S., Henning, S., Herrmann, H., Krüger, O. O., McFiggans, G., Poulain, L., Raj, S. S., Reyes-Villegas, E., Royer, H. M., Walter, D., Wang, Y., and Pöschl, U.: Global organic and inorganic aerosol hygroscopicity and its effect on radiative forcing, Nat. Commun., 14, 6139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41695-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-41695-8</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Philippin, S., Wiedensohler, A., and Stratmann, F.: Measurements of non-volatile fractions of pollution aerosols with an eight-tube volatility tandem differential mobility analyzer (VTDMA-8), J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 185–203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.07.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.07.004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Qiu, Y., Xie, Q., Wang, J., Xu, W., Li, L., Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Wu, Y., Du, W., Zhou, W., Lee, J., Zhao, C., Ge, X., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Vertical Characterization and Source Apportionment of Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol with High-resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry in Beijing, China, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 273–284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00155</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Ren, J., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Collins, D., Fan, X., Jin, X., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Cribb, M., and Li, Z.: Using different assumptions of aerosol mixing state and chemical composition to predict CCN concentrations based on field measurements in urban Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6907–6921, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6907-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-6907-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57, 187–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018RG000615</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation> Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 206–221, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Mikhailov, E., Frank, G. P., Dusek, U., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Calibration and measurement uncertainties of a continuous-flow cloud condensation nuclei counter (DMT-CCNC): CCN activation of ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride aerosol particles in theory and experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1153–1179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 1: Size-resolved measurements and implications for the modeling of aerosol particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3365–3383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Yang, H., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 2: Size-resolved aerosol chemical composition, diurnal cycles, and externally mixed weakly CCN-active soot particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2817–2836, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation> Ruehl, C. R., Davies, J. F., and Wilson, K. R.: An interfacial mechanism for cloud droplet formation on organic aerosols, Science, 351, 1447–1450, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Saha, P. K., Khlystov, A., and Grieshop, A. P.: Downwind evolution of the volatility and mixing state of near-road aerosols near a US interstate highway, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2139–2154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2139-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2139-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G. L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B., Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O., Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D16207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007076</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Spackman, J. R., Watts, L. A., Thomson, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., Holloway, J. S., Trainer, M., Frost, G. J., Baynard, T., Lack, D. A., de Gouw, J. A., Warneke, C., and Del Negro, L. A.: Measurement of the mixing state, mass, and optical size of individual black carbon particles in urban and biomass burning emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L13810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033968" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033968</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Sedlacek III, A. J., Lewis, E. R., Kleinman, L., Xu, J., and Zhang, Q.: Determination of and evidence for non-core-shell structure of particles containing black carbon using the Single-Particle Soot Photometer (SP2), Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06802, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050905" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL050905</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Shi, J., Hong, J., Ma, N., Luo, Q., He, Y., Xu, H., Tan, H., Wang, Q., Tao, J., Zhou, Y., Han, S., Peng, L., Xie, L., Zhou, G., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Cheng, Y., and Su, H.: Measurement report: On the difference in aerosol hygroscopicity between high and low relative humidity conditions in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4599–4613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4599-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-4599-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., Pöschl, U., Rap, A., and Forster, P. M.: Global cloud condensation nuclei influenced by carbonaceous combustion aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9067–9087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9067-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9067-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Stevens, R., Ryjkov, A., Majdzadeh, M., and Dastoor, A.: An improved representation of aerosol mixing state for air quality–weather interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13527–13549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13527-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13527-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation> Stolzenburg, M. R. and McMurry, P. H.: Equations governing single and tandem DMA configurations and a new lognormal approximation to the transfer function, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 421–432, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Su, H., Rose, D., Cheng, Y. F., Gunthe, S. S., Massling, A., Stock, M., Wiedensohler, A., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Hygroscopicity distribution concept for measurement data analysis and modeling of aerosol particle mixing state with regard to hygroscopic growth and CCN activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7489–7503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7489-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7489-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Subramanian, R., Kok, G. L., Baumgardner, D., Clarke, A., Shinozuka, Y., Campos, T. L., Heizer, C. G., Stephens, B. B., de Foy, B., Voss, P. B., and Zaveri, R. A.: Black carbon over Mexico: the effect of atmospheric transport on mixing state, mass absorption cross-section, and BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO ratios, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 219–237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-219-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-219-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Tan, H., Xu, H., Wan, Q., Li, F., Deng, X., Chan, P. W., Xia, D., and Yin, Y.: Design and Application of an Unattended Multifunctional H-TDMA System, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 1136–1148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00129.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00129.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation> Tao, J., Zhao, C., Nan, M., and Ye, K.: Consistency and applicability of parameterization schemes for the size-resolved aerosol activation ratio based on field measurements in the North China Plain, Atmos. Environ., 173, 316–324, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Ma, N., Zheng, Y., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhao, C.: An improved parameterization scheme for size-resolved particle activation ratio and its application on comparison study of particle hygroscopicity measurements between HTDMA and DMA-CCNC, Atmos. Environ., 226, 117403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117403" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117403</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Ma, N., Hong, J., Sun, Y., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., He, Y., Luo, Q., Xie, L., Su, H., and Cheng, Y.: Secondary aerosol formation alters CCN activity in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7409–7427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7409-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-7409-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Tao, M., Chen, L., Su, L., and Tao, J.: Satellite observation of regional haze pollution over the North China Plain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D12203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017915" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017915</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Thalman, R., de Sá, S. S., Palm, B. B., Barbosa, H. M. J., Pöhlker, M. L., Alexander, M. L., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Castillo, P., Day, D. A., Kuang, C., Manzi, A., Ng, N. L., Sedlacek III, A. J., Souza, R., Springston, S., Watson, T., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Jimenez, J. L., Martin, S. T., and Wang, J.: CCN activity and organic hygroscopicity of aerosols downwind of an urban region in central Amazonia: seasonal and diel variations and impact of anthropogenic emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11779–11801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11779-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-11779-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Ting, Y., Mitchell, E. J. S., Allan, J. D., Liu, D., Spracklen, D. V., Williams, A., Jones, J. M., Lea-Langton, A. R., McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.: Mixing State of Carbonaceous Aerosols of Primary Emissions from “Improved” African Cookstoves, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 10134–10143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00456" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b00456</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Tomlin, J. M., Jankowski, K. A., Veghte, D. P., China, S., Wang, P., Fraund, M., Weis, J., Zheng, G., Wang, Y., Rivera-Adorno, F., Raveh-Rubin, S., Knopf, D. A., Wang, J., Gilles, M. K., Moffet, R. C., and Laskin, A.: Impact of dry intrusion events on the composition and mixing state of particles during the winter Aerosol and Cloud Experiment in the Eastern North Atlantic (ACE-ENA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18123–18146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18123-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-18123-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Vu, D., Short, D., Karavalakis, G., Durbin, T. D., and Asa-Awuku, A.: Integrating Cloud Condensation Nuclei Predictions with Fast Time Resolved Aerosol Instrumentation to Determine the Hygroscopic Properties of Emissions Over Transient Drive Cycles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 49, 1149–1159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1105358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2015.1105358</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Vu, D., Short, D., Karavalakis, G., Durbin, T. D., and Asa-Awuku, A.: Will Aerosol Hygroscopicity Change with Biodiesel, Renewable Diesel Fuels and Emission Control Technologies?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 1580–1586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03908" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b03908</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Ye, X., Chen, J., Wang, X., Yang, X., Fu, T.-M., Zhu, L., and Liu, C.: Direct links between hygroscopicity and mixing state of ambient aerosols: estimating particle hygroscopicity from their single-particle mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6273–6290, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6273-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-6273-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Wang, X., Kondo, Y., Kajino, M., Munger, J. W., and Hao, J.: Black carbon and its correlation with trace gases at a rural site in Beijing: Top-down constraints from ambient measurements on bottom-up emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D24304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016575</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Li, Z., Tan, H., Xu, H., Ren, J., Zhao, J., Du, W., and Sun, Y.: Enhanced hydrophobicity and volatility of submicron aerosols under severe emission control conditions in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5239–5251, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5239-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-5239-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Hu, R., Wang, Q., Li, Z., Cribb, M., Sun, Y., Song, X., Shang, Y., Wu, Y., Huang, X., and Wang, Y.: Different effects of anthropogenic emissions and aging processes on the mixing state of soot particles in the nucleation and accumulation modes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14133–14146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14133-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-14133-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Wehner, B., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Achtert, P., Birmili, W., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Garland, R. M., Pöschl, U., Hu, M., and Zhu, T.: Mixing state of nonvolatile aerosol particle fractions and comparison with light absorption in the polluted Beijing region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00G17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010923" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010923</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Wex, H., Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Hallbauer, E., Massling, A., McMeeking, G. R., Poulain, L., Wu, Z., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Stratmann, F.: Towards closing the gap between hygroscopic growth and activation for secondary organic aerosol: Part 1 – Evidence from measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3987–3997, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3987-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3987-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Wang, X., Tao, J., Huang, R., Tian, P., Cao, J., Zhang, L., Ho, K.-F., Han, Z., and Zhang, R.: Size distribution and source of black carbon aerosol in urban Beijing during winter haze episodes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7965–7975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7965-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7965-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Ge, X., Xie, C., Zhou, W., Du, W., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Coe, H.: Changes in Aerosol Chemistry From 2014 to 2016 in Winter in Beijing: Insights From High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1132–1147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029245" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029245</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>Xu, W. Y., Zhao, C. S., Ran, L., Deng, Z. Z., Liu, P. F., Ma, N., Lin, W. L., Xu, X. B., Yan, P., He, X., Yu, J., Liang, W. D., and Chen, L. L.: Characteristics of pollutants and their correlation to meteorological conditions at a suburban site in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4353–4369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4353-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4353-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Z., Ma, N., Wang, Q., Li, G., Pan, X., Dong, W., Zhu, S., Zhang, S., Gao, W., He, Y., Xie, L., Zhang, Y., Kuhn, U., Xu, W., Kuang, Y., Tao, J., Hong, J., Zhou, G., Sun, Y., Su, H., and Cheng, Y.: Characteristics and source apportionment of black carbon aerosol in the North China Plain, Atmos. Res., 276, 106246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106246" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106246</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, F., Li, Y., Li, Z., Sun, L., Li, R., Zhao, C., Wang, P., Sun, Y., Liu, X., Li, J., Li, P., Ren, G., and Fan, T.: Aerosol hygroscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei activity during the AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Exp campaign: implications for cloud condensation nuclei parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13423–13437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13423-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13423-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Peng, J., Chen, L., Sun, Y., Duan, L., Ge, X., Li, Y., Zhao, J., Liu, C., Zhang, X., Zhang, G., Pan, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, A. L., Ji, Y., Wang, G., Hu, M., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: An unexpected catalyst dominates formation and radiative forcing of regional haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 3960–3966, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919343117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1919343117</ext-link>, 2020. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Fu, Y., Peng, X., Sun, W., Shi, Z., Song, W., Hu, W., Chen, D., Lian, X., Li, L., Tang, M., Wang, X., and Bi, X.: Black Carbon Involved Photochemistry Enhances the Formation of Sulfate in the Ambient Atmosphere: Evidence From In Situ Individual Particle Investigation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD035226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035226" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD035226</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, S., Shen, X., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Xia, C., Hu, X., Zhong, J., Wang, J., and Liu, S.: Atmospheric Particle Hygroscopicity and the Influence by Oxidation State of Organic Aerosols in Urban Beijing, J. Environ. Sci., 124, 544–556, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.11.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2021.11.019</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, S. L., Ma, N., Kecorius, S., Wang, P. C., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B., Größ, J., Wu, Z. J., and Wiedensohler, A.: Mixing state of atmospheric particles over the North China Plain, Atmos. Environ., 125, 152–164, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Su, H., Ma, N., Li, G., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Hu, M., Zhu, T., He, K., Wiedensohler, A., Zhang, Q., and Cheng, Y.: Sizing of Ambient Particles From a Single-Particle Soot Photometer Measurement to Retrieve Mixing State of Black Carbon at a Regional Site of the North China Plain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 12778–12795, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD028810</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Yuan, Q., Huang, D., Kong, S., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Lu, C., Shi, Z., Zhang, X., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Shao, L., Zhu, J., and Li, W.: Direct Observations of Fine Primary Particles From Residential Coal Burning: Insights Into Their Morphology, Composition, and Hygroscopicity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 12964–12979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028988" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD028988</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., Yao, Z., and Li, H.: Particle Size and Mixing State of Freshly Emitted Black Carbon from Different Combustion Sources in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7766–7774, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07373" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b07373</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, G., Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Shen, C., Yu, Y., and Zhao, C.: Role of black carbon mass size distribution in the direct aerosol radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13175–13188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13175-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13175-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, G., Tan, T., Hu, S., Du, Z., Shang, D., Wu, Z., Guo, S., Zheng, J., Zhu, W., Li, M., Zeng, L., and Hu, M.: Mixing state of black carbon at different atmospheres in north and southwest China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10861–10873, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10861-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-10861-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, H., Kong, S., Wu, F., Cheng, Y., Niu, Z., Zheng, S., Yang, G., Yao, L., Yan, Q., Wu, J., Zheng, M., Chen, N., Xu, K., Yan, Y., Liu, D., Zhao, D., Zhao, T., Bai, Y., Li, S., and Qi, S.: Intra-regional transport of black carbon between the south edge of the North China Plain and central China during winter haze episodes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4499–4516, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4499-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-4499-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>Zhuang, B. L., Li, S., Wang, T. J., Deng, J. J., Xie, M., Yin, C. Q., and Zhu, J. L.: Direct radiative forcing and climate effects of anthropogenic aerosols with different mixing states over China, Atmos. Environ., 79, 349–361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.004</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Markedly different impacts of primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation on aerosol mixing states revealed by simultaneous measurements of CCNC, H(/V)TDMA, and SP2</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adachi, K., Sedlacek, A. J., Kleinman, L., Chand, D., Hubbe, J. M., and
Buseck, P. R.: Volume changes upon heating of aerosol particles from biomass
burning using transmission electron microscopy, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 46–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1373181" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1373181</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adachi, K., Sedlacek, A. J., Kleinman, L., Springston, S. R., Wang, J.,
Chand, D., Hubbe, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Onasch, T. B., Kinase, T., Sakata,
K., Takahashi, Y., and Buseck, P. R.: Spherical tarball particles form
through rapid chemical and physical changes of organic matter in
biomass-burning smoke, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 19336–19341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900129116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900129116</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kaercher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bougiatioti, A., Bezantakos, S., Stavroulas, I., Kalivitis, N., Kokkalis, P., Biskos, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Papayannis, A., and Nenes, A.: Biomass-burning impact on CCN number, hygroscopicity and cloud formation during summertime in the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7389–7409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7389-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7389-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, M., Tan, H., Chan, C. K., Mochida, M., Hatakeyama, S., Kondo, Y.,
Schurman, M. I., Xu, H., Li, F., Shimada, K., Li, L., Deng, Y., Yai, H.,
Matsuki, A., Qin, Y., and Zhao, J.: Comparison of Aerosol Hygroscopcity,
Volatility, and Chemical Composition between a Suburban Site in the Pearl
River Delta Region and a Marine Site in Okinawa, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 17, 3194–3208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0020</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cai, M., Huang, S., Liang, B., Sun, Q., Liu, L., Yuan, B., Shao, M., Hu, W., Chen, W., Song, Q., Li, W., Peng, Y., Wang, Z., Chen, D., Tan, H., Xu, H., Li, F., Deng, X., Deng, T., Sun, J., and Zhao, J.: Measurement report: Distinct size dependence and diurnal variation in organic aerosol hygroscopicity, volatility, and cloud condensation nuclei activity at a rural site in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8117–8136, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8117-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8117-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H., Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K. R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cerully, K. M., Bougiatioti, A., Hite Jr., J. R., Guo, H., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Weber, R., and Nenes, A.: On the link between hygroscopicity, volatility, and oxidation state of ambient and water-soluble aerosols in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8679–8694, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8679-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8679-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, C., Qiu, Y., Xu, W., He, Y., Li, Z., Sun, J., Ma, N., Xu, W., Pan, X.,
Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Sun, Y.: Primary Emissions and Secondary Aerosol Processing During Wintertime in Rural Area of North China Plain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035430" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035430</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, J., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Miyakawa, T., Komazaki, Y., and Kuwata, M.: Secondary aerosol formation promotes water uptake by organic-rich wildfire haze particles in equatorial Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7781–7798, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7781-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7781-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Y. F., Su, H., Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Berghof, M., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Shiraiwa, M., Gong, Y. G., Shao, M., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Zhang, Y. H., Carmichael, G. R., Wiedensohler, A., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Size-resolved measurement of the mixing state of soot in the megacity Beijing, China: diurnal cycle, aging and parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4477–4491, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4477-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4477-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ching, J., Fast, J., West, M., and Riemer, N.: Metrics to quantify the importance of mixing state for CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7445–7458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ching, J., Adachi, K., Zaizen, Y., Igarashi, Y., and Kajino, M.: Aerosol
mixing state revealed by transmission electron microscopy pertaining to
cloud formation and human airway deposition, npj Climate and Atmospheric
Science, 2, 22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0081-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0081-9</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deng, Z. Z., Zhao, C. S., Ma, N., Liu, P. F., Ran, L., Xu, W. Y., Chen, J., Liang, Z., Liang, S., Huang, M. Y., Ma, X. C., Zhang, Q., Quan, J. N., Yan, P., Henning, S., Mildenberger, K., Sommerhage, E., Schäfer, M., Stratmann, F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Size-resolved and bulk activation properties of aerosols in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3835–3846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3835-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3835-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deng, Z. Z., Zhao, C. S., Ma, N., Ran, L., Zhou, G. Q., Lu, D. R., and Zhou, X. J.: An examination of parameterizations for the CCN number concentration based on in situ measurements of aerosol activation properties in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6227–6237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6227-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6227-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Massling, A., Zeromskiene, K., Iinuma, Y., Schmid, O., Helas, G., Hennig, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Andreae, M. O.: Water uptake by biomass burning aerosol at sub- and supersaturated conditions: closure studies and implications for the role of organics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9519–9532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9519-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9519-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The ”dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Engelhart, G. J., Hennigan, C. J., Miracolo, M. A., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity of fresh primary and aged biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7285–7293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ervens, B.: Modeling the Processing of Aerosol and Trace Gases in Clouds and
Fogs, Chem. Rev., 115, 4157–4198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Farmer, D. K., Cappa, C. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Atmospheric Processes
and Their Controlling Influence on Cloud Condensation Nuclei Activity,
Chem. Rev., 115, 4199–4217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006292" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006292</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward Reduced Representation of
Mixing State for Simulating Aerosol Effects on Climate, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 971–980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fofie, E. A., Donahue, N. M., and Asa-Awuku, A.: Cloud condensation nuclei
activity and droplet formation of primary and secondary organic aerosol
mixtures, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 242–251,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1392480" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1392480</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fu, Y., Peng, X., Sun, W., Hu, X., Wang, D., Yang, Y., Guo, Z., Wang, Y.,
Zhang, G., Zhu, J., Ou, J., Shi, Z., Wang, X., and Bi, X.: Impact of Cloud
Process in the Mixing State and Microphysical Properties of Soot Particles:
Implications in Light Absorption Enhancement, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037169</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gysel, M., Laborde, M., Olfert, J. S., Subramanian, R., and Gröhn, A. J.: Effective density of Aquadag and fullerene soot black carbon reference materials used for SP2 calibration, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2851–2858, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2851-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2851-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hagen, D. E. and Alofs, D. J.: Linear Inversion Method to Obtain Aerosol Size Distributions from Measurements with a Differential Mobility Analyzer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 2, 465–475, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828308958650" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828308958650</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hennigan, C. J., Westervelt, D. M., Riipinen, I., Engelhart, G. J., Lee, T.,
Collett Jr., J. L., Pandis, S. N., Adams, P. J., and Robinson, A. L.: New
particle formation and growth in biomass burning plumes: An important source
of cloud condensation nuclei, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050930" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050930</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Herich, H., Kammermann, L., Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U.,
Lohmann, U., and Cziczo, D. J.: In situ determination of atmospheric aerosol
composition as a function of hygroscopic growth, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D16213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009954" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009954</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Herich, H., Kammermann, L., Friedman, B., Gross, D. S., Weingartner, E., Lohmann, U., Spichtinger, P., Gysel, M., Baltensperger, U., and Cziczo, D.
J.: Subarctic atmospheric aerosol composition: 2. Hygroscopic growth
properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D13204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011574" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011574</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersey, S. P., Craven, J. S., Metcalf, A. R., Lin, J., Lathem, T., Suski, K.
J., Cahill, J. F., Duong, H. T., Sorooshian, A., Jonsson, H. H., Shiraiwa,
M., Zuend, A., Nenes, A., Prather, K. A., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J.
H.: Composition and hygroscopicity of the Los Angeles Aerosol: CalNex,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 3016–3036, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50307" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50307</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hodas, N., Zuend, A., Schilling, K., Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Discontinuities in hygroscopic growth below and above water saturation for laboratory surrogates of oligomers in organic atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12767–12792, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12767-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12767-2016</a>, 2016.​​​​​​​

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hong, J., Äijälä, M., Häme, S. A. K., Hao, L., Duplissy, J., Heikkinen, L. M., Nie, W., Mikkilä, J., Kulmala, M., Prisle, N. L., Virtanen, A., Ehn, M., Paasonen, P., Worsnop, D. R., Riipinen, I., Petäjä, T., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Estimates of the organic aerosol volatility in a boreal forest using two independent methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4387–4399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4387-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4387-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb,
C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for
Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 49–70, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiang, X., Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Hong, J., and Ma, N.: Mathematical derivation
and physical interpretation of particle size-resolved activation ratio based
on particle hygroscopicity distribution: Application on global
characterization of CCN activity, Atmos. Environ., 246, 118137,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118137" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118137</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jurányi, Z., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M., Laborde, M., Gomes, L., Roberts, G., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Hygroscopic mixing state of urban aerosol derived from size-resolved cloud condensation nuclei measurements during the MEGAPOLI campaign in Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6431–6446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6431-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6431-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kawana, K., Nakayama, T., and Mochida, M.: Hygroscopicity and CCN activity
of atmospheric aerosol particles and their relation to organics: Characteristics of urban aerosols in Nagoya, Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 4100–4121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023213</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, N., Yum, S. S., Park, M., Park, J. S., Shin, H. J., and Ahn, J. Y.: Hygroscopicity of urban aerosols and its link to size-resolved chemical composition during spring and summer in Seoul, Korea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11245–11262, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11245-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11245-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuang, Y., Zhao, C. S., Tao, J. C., and Ma, N.: Diurnal variations of aerosol optical properties in the North China Plain and their influences on the estimates of direct aerosol radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5761–5772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5761-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5761-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuang, Y., He, Y., Xu, W., Yuan, B., Zhang, G., Ma, Z., Wu, C., Wang, C.,
Wang, S., Zhang, S., Tao, J., Ma, N., Su, H., Cheng, Y., Shao, M., and Sun,
Y.: Photochemical Aqueous-Phase Reactions Induce Rapid Daytime Formation of
Oxygenated Organic Aerosol on the North China Plain, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 3849–3860, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06836" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06836</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuang, Y., Huang, S., Xue, B., Luo, B., Song, Q., Chen, W., Hu, W., Li, W., Zhao, P., Cai, M., Peng, Y., Qi, J., Li, T., Wang, S., Chen, D., Yue, D., Yuan, B., and Shao, M.: Contrasting effects of secondary organic aerosol formations on organic aerosol hygroscopicity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10375–10391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10375-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10375-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuwata, M. and Kondo, Y.: Dependence of size-resolved CCN spectra on the
mixing state of nonvolatile cores observed in Tokyo, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D19202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009761" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009761</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuwata, M., Kondo, Y., Mochida, M., Takegawa, N., and Kawamura, K.: Dependence of CCN activity of less volatile particles on the amount of
coating observed in Tokyo, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D11207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007758" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007758</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laborde, M., Crippa, M., Tritscher, T., Jurányi, Z., Decarlo, P. F., Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., and Gysel, M.: Black carbon physical properties and mixing state in the European megacity Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5831–5856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lack, D. A., Langridge, J. M., Bahreini, R., Cappa, C. D., Middlebrook, A.
M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Brown carbon and internal mixing in biomass burning
particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 14802–14807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lance, S., Nenes, A., Medina, J., and Smith, J. N.: Mapping the operation of
the DMT continuous flow CCN counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech. 40, 242–254, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lance, S., Raatikainen, T., Onasch, T. B., Worsnop, D. R., Yu, X.-Y., Alexander, M. L., Stolzenburg, M. R., McMurry, P. H., Smith, J. N., and Nenes, A.: Aerosol mixing state, hygroscopic growth and cloud activation efficiency during MIRAGE 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5049–5062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5049-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5049-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lata, N. N., Zhang, B., Schum, S., Mazzoleni, L., Brimberry, R., Marcus, M.
A., Cantrell, W. H., Fialho, P., Mazzoleni, C., and China, S.: Aerosol
Composition, Mixing State, and Phase State of Free Tropospheric Particles
and Their Role in Ice Cloud Formation, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 3499–3510,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00315" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00315</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, A. K. Y., Rivellini, L.-H., Chen, C.-L., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha,
R., Russell, L. M., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Influences of Primary
Emission and Secondary Coating Formation on the Particle Diversity and
Mixing State of Black Carbon Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53,
9429–9438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03064</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, G., Su, H., Ma, N., Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Wang, Q., Hong, J., Zhang, Y.,
Kuhn, U., and Zhang, S.: Multiphase chemistry experiment in Fogs and
Aerosols in the North China Plain (McFAN): integrated analysis and intensive
winter campaign 2018, Faraday Discuss., 226, 207–222, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S.,
Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, D., Joshi, R., Wang, J., Yu, C., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Flynn, M. J., Xie, C., Lee, J., Squires, F., Kotthaus, S., Grimmond, S., Ge, X., Sun, Y., and Fu, P.: Contrasting physical properties of black carbon in urban Beijing between winter and summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6749–6769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, D., Li, S., Hu, D., Kong, S., Cheng, Y., Wu, Y., Ding, S., Hu, K.,
Zheng, S., Yan, Q., Zheng, H., Zhao, D., Tian, P., Ye, J., Huang, M., and
Ding, D.: Evolution of Aerosol Optical Properties from Wood Smoke in Real
Atmosphere Influenced by Burning Phase and Solar Radiation, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 55, 5677–5688, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07569" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07569</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, P., Song, M., Zhao, T., Gunthe, S. S., Ham, S., He, Y., Qin, Y. M., Gong, Z., Amorim, J. C., Bertram, A. K., and Martin, S. T.: Resolving the mechanisms of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nuclei activity for organic particulate matter, Nat. Commun., 9, 4076, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06622-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06622-2</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, P., Kaplan, J. O., Mickley, L. J., Li, Y., Chellman, N. J., Arienzo, M.
M., Kodros, J. K., Pierce, J. R., Sigl, M., Freitag, J., Mulvaney, R.,
Curran, M. A. J., and McConnell, J. R.: Improved estimates of preindustrial
biomass burning reduce the magnitude of aerosol climate forcing in the
Southern Hemisphere, Science Advances, 7, eabc1379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc1379" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc1379</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, K., Zhang, C., Cheng, Y., Liu, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, G., Sun, X., and
Mu, Y.: Serious BTEX pollution in rural area of the North China Plain during
winter season, J. Environ. Sci., 30, 186–190, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.05.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.05.056</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, P. F., Zhao, C. S., Göbel, T., Hallbauer, E., Nowak, A., Ran, L., Xu, W. Y., Deng, Z. Z., Ma, N., Mildenberger, K., Henning, S., Stratmann, F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Hygroscopic properties of aerosol particles at high relative humidity and their diurnal variations in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3479–3494, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3479-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3479-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luo, B., Kuang, Y., Huang, S., Song, Q., Hu, W., Li, W., Peng, Y., Chen, D., Yue, D., Yuan, B., and Shao, M.: Parameterizations of size distribution and refractive index of biomass burning organic aerosol with black carbon content, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12401–12415, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12401-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12401-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, N., Zhao, C. S., Müller, T., Cheng, Y. F., Liu, P. F., Deng, Z. Z., Xu, W. Y., Ran, L., Nekat, B., van Pinxteren, D., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Herrmann, H., Yan, P., Zhou, X. J., and Wiedensohler, A.: A new method to determine the mixing state of light absorbing carbonaceous using the measured aerosol optical properties and number size distributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2381–2397, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2381-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2381-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, N., Zhao, C., Tao, J., Wu, Z., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Größ, J., Liu, H., Bian, Y., Kuang, Y., Teich, M., Spindler, G., Müller, K., van Pinxteren, D., Herrmann, H., Hu, M., and Wiedensohler, A.: Variation of CCN activity during new particle formation events in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8593–8607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8593-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8593-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Malek, K. A., Gohil, K., Al-Abadleh, H. A., and Asa-Awuku, A. A.:
Hygroscopicity of polycatechol and polyguaiacol secondary organic aerosol in
sub- and supersaturated water vapor environments, Environmental Science: Atmospheres, 2, 24–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ea00063b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ea00063b</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matsui, H., Hamilton, D. S., and Mahowald, N. M.: Black carbon radiative
effects highly sensitive to emitted particle size when resolving
mixing-state diversity, Nat. Commun., 9, 3446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05635-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05635-1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
May, A. A., Levin, E. J. T., Hennigan, C. J., Riipinen, I., Lee, T., Collett
Jr., J. L., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Robinson, A. L.:
Gas-particle partitioning of primary organic aerosol emissions: 3. Biomass
burning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 11327–11338,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50828</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mei, F., Hayes, P. L., Ortega, A., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., Gilman, J.,
Kuster, W., de Gouw, J., Jimenez, J. L., and Wang, J.: Droplet activation
properties of organic aerosols observed at an urban site during CalNex-LA,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2903–2917, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50285" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50285</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Metcalf, A. R., Craven, J. S., Ensberg, J. J., Brioude, J., Angevine, W.,
Sorooshian, A., Duong, H. T., Jonsson, H. H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld,
J. H.: Black carbon aerosol over the Los Angeles Basin during CalNex, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017255" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017255</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Middlebrook, A. M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J. L., and Canagaratna, M. R.:
Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne
Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 258–271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.620041</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moffet, R. C., O'Brien, R. E., Alpert, P. A., Kelly, S. T., Pham, D. Q., Gilles, M. K., Knopf, D. A., and Laskin, A.: Morphology and mixing of black carbon particles collected in central California during the CARES field study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14515–14525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14515-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14515-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mohr, C., Huffman, J. A., Cubison, M. J., Aiken, A. C., Docherty, K. S.,
Kimmel, J. R., Ulbrich, I. M., Hannigan, M., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Characterization of Primary Organic Aerosol Emissions from Meat Cooking,
Trash Burning, and Motor Vehicles with High-Resolution Aerosol Mass
Spectrometry and Comparison with Ambient and Chamber Observations, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 43, 2443–2449, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8011518" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es8011518</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moteki, N. and Kondo, Y.: Effects of Mixing State on Black Carbon Measurements by Laser-Induced Incandescence, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 398–417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701199728" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701199728</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mukherjee, S., Anil Kumar, V., Patil, R. D., Meena, G. S., Buchunde, P.,
Waghmare, V., Deshmukh, S., Dhavale, V., Ray, A., Panicker, A. S., Sonbawne,
S. M., Safai, P. D., and Pandithurai, G.: Investigation of physico-chemical
characteristics and associated CCN activation for different combustion
sources through Chamber experiment approach, Atmos. Environ., 266,
118726, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118726</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nordmann, S., Cheng, Y. F., Carmichael, G. R., Yu, M., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Zhang, Q., Saide, P. E., Pöschl, U., Su, H., Birmili, W., and Wiedensohler, A.: Atmospheric black carbon and warming effects influenced by the source and absorption enhancement in central Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12683–12699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12683-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12683-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ovadnevaite, J., Zuend, A., Laaksonen, A., Sanchez, K. J., Roberts, G.,
Ceburnis, D., Decesari, S., Rinaldi, M., Hodas, N., Facchini, M. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and O'Dowd, C.: Surface tension prevails over solute effect in organic-influenced cloud droplet activation, Nature, 546, 637–641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22806" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22806</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,
Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pajunoja, A., Lambe, A. T., Hakala, J., Rastak, N., Cummings, M. J., Brogan,
J. F., Hao, L., Paramonov, M., Hong, J., Prisle, N. L., Malila, J.,
Romakkaniemi, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kulmala, M., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Donahue, N. M., Riipinen, I., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., Petäjä, T., and Virtanen, A.:, 2015. Adsorptive uptake of water by semisolid secondary organic aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3063–3068, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063142</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M.,
Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D.
R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct
radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pöhlker, M. L., Ditas, F., Saturno, J., Klimach, T., Hrabě de Angelis, I., Araùjo, A. C., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Cheng, Y., Chi, X., Ditz, R., Gunthe, S. S., Holanda, B. A., Kandler, K., Kesselmeier, J., Könemann, T., Krüger, O. O., Lavrič, J. V., Martin, S. T., Mikhailov, E., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Rizzo, L. V., Rose, D., Su, H., Thalman, R., Walter, D., Wang, J., Wolff, S., Barbosa, H. M. J., Artaxo, P., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., and Pöhlker, C.: Long-term observations of cloud condensation nuclei over the Amazon rain forest – Part 2: Variability and characteristics of biomass burning, long-range transport, and pristine rain forest aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10289–10331, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10289-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10289-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pöhlker, M. L., Pöhlker, C., Quaas, J., Mülmenstädt, J.,
Pozzer, A., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Block, K., Coe, H., Ervens, B.,
Gallimore, P., Gaston, C. J., Gunthe, S. S., Henning, S., Herrmann, H.,
Krüger, O. O., McFiggans, G., Poulain, L., Raj, S. S., Reyes-Villegas,
E., Royer, H. M., Walter, D., Wang, Y., and Pöschl, U.: Global organic
and inorganic aerosol hygroscopicity and its effect on radiative forcing,
Nat. Commun., 14, 6139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41695-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41695-8</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Philippin, S., Wiedensohler, A., and Stratmann, F.: Measurements of
non-volatile fractions of pollution aerosols with an eight-tube volatility
tandem differential mobility analyzer (VTDMA-8), J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 185–203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.07.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.07.004</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Qiu, Y., Xie, Q., Wang, J., Xu, W., Li, L., Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Chen, Y.,
Chen, Y., Wu, Y., Du, W., Zhou, W., Lee, J., Zhao, C., Ge, X., Fu, P., Wang,
Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Vertical Characterization and Source
Apportionment of Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol with High-resolution Aerosol
Mass Spectrometry in Beijing, China, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 273–284,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00155</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ren, J., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Collins, D., Fan, X., Jin, X., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Cribb, M., and Li, Z.: Using different assumptions of aerosol mixing state and chemical composition to predict CCN concentrations based on field measurements in urban Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6907–6921, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6907-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6907-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol
Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57, 187–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient
CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 206–221, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Mikhailov, E., Frank, G. P., Dusek, U., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Calibration and measurement uncertainties of a continuous-flow cloud condensation nuclei counter (DMT-CCNC): CCN activation of ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride aerosol particles in theory and experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1153–1179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1153-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rose, D., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 1: Size-resolved measurements and implications for the modeling of aerosol particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3365–3383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rose, D., Gunthe, S. S., Su, H., Garland, R. M., Yang, H., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Wehner, B., Achtert, P., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Takegawa, N., Kondo, Y., Hu, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 2: Size-resolved aerosol chemical composition, diurnal cycles, and externally mixed weakly CCN-active soot particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2817–2836, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ruehl, C. R., Davies, J. F., and Wilson, K. R.: An interfacial mechanism for
cloud droplet formation on organic aerosols, Science, 351, 1447–1450, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saha, P. K., Khlystov, A., and Grieshop, A. P.: Downwind evolution of the volatility and mixing state of near-road aerosols near a US interstate highway, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2139–2154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2139-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2139-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G. L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B., Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O., Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D16207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Spackman, J. R., Watts, L. A., Thomson, D. S.,
Fahey, D. W., Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., Holloway, J. S., Trainer, M.,
Frost, G. J., Baynard, T., Lack, D. A., de Gouw, J. A., Warneke, C., and Del
Negro, L. A.: Measurement of the mixing state, mass, and optical size of
individual black carbon particles in urban and biomass burning emissions,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L13810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033968" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033968</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sedlacek III, A. J., Lewis, E. R., Kleinman, L., Xu, J., and Zhang, Q.:
Determination of and evidence for non-core-shell structure of particles
containing black carbon using the Single-Particle Soot Photometer (SP2),
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06802, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050905" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL050905</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, J., Hong, J., Ma, N., Luo, Q., He, Y., Xu, H., Tan, H., Wang, Q., Tao, J., Zhou, Y., Han, S., Peng, L., Xie, L., Zhou, G., Xu, W., Sun, Y., Cheng, Y., and Su, H.: Measurement report: On the difference in aerosol hygroscopicity between high and low relative humidity conditions in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4599–4613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4599-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4599-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spracklen, D. V., Carslaw, K. S., Pöschl, U., Rap, A., and Forster, P. M.: Global cloud condensation nuclei influenced by carbonaceous combustion aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9067–9087, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9067-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9067-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stevens, R., Ryjkov, A., Majdzadeh, M., and Dastoor, A.: An improved representation of aerosol mixing state for air quality–weather interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13527–13549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13527-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13527-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stolzenburg, M. R. and McMurry, P. H.: Equations governing single and tandem
DMA configurations and a new lognormal approximation to the transfer function, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 421–432, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, H., Rose, D., Cheng, Y. F., Gunthe, S. S., Massling, A., Stock, M., Wiedensohler, A., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Hygroscopicity distribution concept for measurement data analysis and modeling of aerosol particle mixing state with regard to hygroscopic growth and CCN activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7489–7503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7489-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7489-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
      
Subramanian, R., Kok, G. L., Baumgardner, D., Clarke, A., Shinozuka, Y., Campos, T. L., Heizer, C. G., Stephens, B. B., de Foy, B., Voss, P. B., and Zaveri, R. A.: Black carbon over Mexico: the effect of atmospheric transport on mixing state, mass absorption cross-section, and BC&thinsp;∕&thinsp;CO ratios, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 219–237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-219-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-219-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tan, H., Xu, H., Wan, Q., Li, F., Deng, X., Chan, P. W., Xia, D., and Yin,
Y.: Design and Application of an Unattended Multifunctional H-TDMA System,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 1136–1148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00129.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00129.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, J., Zhao, C., Nan, M., and Ye, K.: Consistency and applicability of
parameterization schemes for the size-resolved aerosol activation ratio
based on field measurements in the North China Plain, Atmos. Environ., 173, 316–324, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Ma, N., Zheng, Y., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhao, C.: An
improved parameterization scheme for size-resolved particle activation ratio
and its application on comparison study of particle hygroscopicity
measurements between HTDMA and DMA-CCNC, Atmos. Environ., 226,
117403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117403" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117403</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Ma, N., Hong, J., Sun, Y., Xu, W., Zhang, Y., He, Y., Luo, Q., Xie, L., Su, H., and Cheng, Y.: Secondary aerosol formation alters CCN activity in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7409–7427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7409-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7409-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, M., Chen, L., Su, L., and Tao, J.: Satellite observation of regional
haze pollution over the North China Plain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D12203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017915" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017915</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thalman, R., de Sá, S. S., Palm, B. B., Barbosa, H. M. J., Pöhlker, M. L., Alexander, M. L., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Castillo, P., Day, D. A., Kuang, C., Manzi, A., Ng, N. L., Sedlacek III, A. J., Souza, R., Springston, S., Watson, T., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Jimenez, J. L., Martin, S. T., and Wang, J.: CCN activity and organic hygroscopicity of aerosols downwind of an urban region in central Amazonia: seasonal and diel variations and impact of anthropogenic emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11779–11801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11779-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11779-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ting, Y., Mitchell, E. J. S., Allan, J. D., Liu, D., Spracklen, D. V.,
Williams, A., Jones, J. M., Lea-Langton, A. R., McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.:
Mixing State of Carbonaceous Aerosols of Primary Emissions from “Improved”
African Cookstoves, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 10134–10143,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00456" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00456</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tomlin, J. M., Jankowski, K. A., Veghte, D. P., China, S., Wang, P., Fraund, M., Weis, J., Zheng, G., Wang, Y., Rivera-Adorno, F., Raveh-Rubin, S., Knopf, D. A., Wang, J., Gilles, M. K., Moffet, R. C., and Laskin, A.: Impact of dry intrusion events on the composition and mixing state of particles during the winter Aerosol and Cloud Experiment in the Eastern North Atlantic (ACE-ENA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18123–18146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18123-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18123-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ulbrich, I. M., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891–2918, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vu, D., Short, D., Karavalakis, G., Durbin, T. D., and Asa-Awuku, A.:
Integrating Cloud Condensation Nuclei Predictions with Fast Time Resolved
Aerosol Instrumentation to Determine the Hygroscopic Properties of Emissions
Over Transient Drive Cycles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 49, 1149–1159,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1105358" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1105358</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vu, D., Short, D., Karavalakis, G., Durbin, T. D., and Asa-Awuku, A.: Will
Aerosol Hygroscopicity Change with Biodiesel, Renewable Diesel Fuels and
Emission Control Technologies?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 1580–1586,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03908" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03908</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, X., Ye, X., Chen, J., Wang, X., Yang, X., Fu, T.-M., Zhu, L., and Liu, C.: Direct links between hygroscopicity and mixing state of ambient aerosols: estimating particle hygroscopicity from their single-particle mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6273–6290, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6273-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6273-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Wang, X., Kondo, Y., Kajino, M., Munger, J. W., and Hao, J.: Black
carbon and its correlation with trace gases at a rural site in Beijing:
Top-down constraints from ambient measurements on bottom-up emissions,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D24304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016575" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016575</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Li, Z., Tan, H., Xu, H., Ren, J., Zhao, J., Du, W., and Sun, Y.: Enhanced hydrophobicity and volatility of submicron aerosols under severe emission control conditions in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5239–5251, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5239-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5239-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Hu, R., Wang, Q., Li, Z., Cribb, M., Sun, Y., Song, X., Shang, Y., Wu, Y., Huang, X., and Wang, Y.: Different effects of anthropogenic emissions and aging processes on the mixing state of soot particles in the nucleation and accumulation modes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14133–14146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14133-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14133-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wehner, B., Berghof, M., Cheng, Y. F., Achtert, P., Birmili, W., Nowak, A.,
Wiedensohler, A., Garland, R. M., Pöschl, U., Hu, M., and Zhu, T.: Mixing state of nonvolatile aerosol particle fractions and comparison with light absorption in the polluted Beijing region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00G17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010923" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010923</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wex, H., Petters, M. D., Carrico, C. M., Hallbauer, E., Massling, A., McMeeking, G. R., Poulain, L., Wu, Z., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Stratmann, F.: Towards closing the gap between hygroscopic growth and activation for secondary organic aerosol: Part 1 – Evidence from measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3987–3997, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3987-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3987-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, Y., Wang, X., Tao, J., Huang, R., Tian, P., Cao, J., Zhang, L., Ho, K.-F., Han, Z., and Zhang, R.: Size distribution and source of black carbon aerosol in urban Beijing during winter haze episodes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7965–7975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7965-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7965-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Ge, X., Xie, C., Zhou, W.,
Du, W., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Coe, H.: Changes in
Aerosol Chemistry From 2014 to 2016 in Winter in Beijing: Insights From
High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1132–1147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029245" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029245</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, W. Y., Zhao, C. S., Ran, L., Deng, Z. Z., Liu, P. F., Ma, N., Lin, W. L., Xu, X. B., Yan, P., He, X., Yu, J., Liang, W. D., and Chen, L. L.: Characteristics of pollutants and their correlation to meteorological conditions at a suburban site in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4353–4369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4353-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4353-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Z., Ma, N., Wang, Q., Li, G., Pan, X., Dong, W., Zhu, S., Zhang, S.,
Gao, W., He, Y., Xie, L., Zhang, Y., Kuhn, U., Xu, W., Kuang, Y., Tao, J.,
Hong, J., Zhou, G., Sun, Y., Su, H., and Cheng, Y.: Characteristics and
source apportionment of black carbon aerosol in the North China Plain,
Atmos. Res., 276, 106246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106246" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106246</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, F., Li, Y., Li, Z., Sun, L., Li, R., Zhao, C., Wang, P., Sun, Y., Liu, X., Li, J., Li, P., Ren, G., and Fan, T.: Aerosol hygroscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei activity during the AC<sup>3</sup>Exp campaign: implications for cloud condensation nuclei parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13423–13437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13423-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13423-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Peng, J., Chen, L., Sun, Y., Duan, L., Ge, X., Li, Y.,
Zhao, J., Liu, C., Zhang, X., Zhang, G., Pan, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, A. L.,
Ji, Y., Wang, G., Hu, M., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: An unexpected
catalyst dominates formation and radiative forcing of regional haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 3960–3966, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919343117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919343117</a>, 2020.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, G., Fu, Y., Peng, X., Sun, W., Shi, Z., Song, W., Hu, W., Chen, D.,
Lian, X., Li, L., Tang, M., Wang, X., and Bi, X.: Black Carbon Involved
Photochemistry Enhances the Formation of Sulfate in the Ambient Atmosphere:
Evidence From In Situ Individual Particle Investigation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD035226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035226" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035226</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, S., Shen, X., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Xia, C., Hu, X., Zhong,
J., Wang, J., and Liu, S.: Atmospheric Particle Hygroscopicity and the
Influence by Oxidation State of Organic Aerosols in Urban Beijing, J. Environ. Sci., 124, 544–556, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.11.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.11.019</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, S. L., Ma, N., Kecorius, S., Wang, P. C., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B.,
Größ, J., Wu, Z. J., and Wiedensohler, A.: Mixing state of atmospheric particles over the North China Plain, Atmos. Environ., 125, 152–164, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Su, H., Ma, N., Li, G., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Hu, M., Zhu, T.,
He, K., Wiedensohler, A., Zhang, Q., and Cheng, Y.: Sizing of Ambient
Particles From a Single-Particle Soot Photometer Measurement to Retrieve
Mixing State of Black Carbon at a Regional Site of the North China Plain,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 12778–12795, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028810" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028810</a>, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Yuan, Q., Huang, D., Kong, S., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Lu, C., Shi,
Z., Zhang, X., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Shao, L., Zhu, J., and Li, W.: Direct
Observations of Fine Primary Particles From Residential Coal Burning:
Insights Into Their Morphology, Composition, and Hygroscopicity,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 12964–12979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028988" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028988</a>, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., Yao, Z., and Li, H.: Particle Size and Mixing State of Freshly Emitted Black Carbon from Different Combustion Sources in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7766–7774, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07373" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07373</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, G., Tao, J., Kuang, Y., Shen, C., Yu, Y., and Zhao, C.: Role of black carbon mass size distribution in the direct aerosol radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13175–13188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13175-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13175-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, G., Tan, T., Hu, S., Du, Z., Shang, D., Wu, Z., Guo, S., Zheng, J., Zhu, W., Li, M., Zeng, L., and Hu, M.: Mixing state of black carbon at different atmospheres in north and southwest China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10861–10873, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10861-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10861-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, H., Kong, S., Wu, F., Cheng, Y., Niu, Z., Zheng, S., Yang, G., Yao, L., Yan, Q., Wu, J., Zheng, M., Chen, N., Xu, K., Yan, Y., Liu, D., Zhao, D., Zhao, T., Bai, Y., Li, S., and Qi, S.: Intra-regional transport of black carbon between the south edge of the North China Plain and central China during winter haze episodes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4499–4516, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4499-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4499-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhuang, B. L., Li, S., Wang, T. J., Deng, J. J., Xie, M., Yin, C. Q., and
Zhu, J. L.: Direct radiative forcing and climate effects of anthropogenic
aerosols with different mixing states over China, Atmos. Environ., 79, 349–361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.004</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
