<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-24-3973-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>Simulation of ozone–vegetation coupling and feedback in China using multiple ozone damage schemes</article-title><alt-title>Ozone–vegetation coupling and feedback in China​​​​​​​</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Ozone--vegetation coupling and feedback in China​​​​​​​}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Cao et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Jiachen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yue</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name>
          <email>yuexu@nuist.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-8192</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Mingrui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing, 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Xu Yue (yuexu@nuist.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>April</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>3973</fpage><lpage>3987</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>September</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>February</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>February</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>November</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e107">As a phytotoxic pollutant, surface ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) not only affects plant physiology but also influences meteorological fields and air quality by altering leaf stomatal functions. Previous studies revealed strong feedbacks of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling in China but with large uncertainties due to the applications of varied <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage schemes and chemistry–vegetation models. In this study, we quantify the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage and the consequent feedbacks to surface meteorology and air quality in China by coupling two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage schemes (S2007 vs. L2013) into a fully coupled regional meteorology–chemistry model. With different schemes and damaging sensitivities, surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is predicted to decrease summertime gross primary productivity by 5.5 %–21.4 % and transpiration by 5.4 %–23.2 % in China, in which the L2013 scheme yields 2.5–4 times of losses relative to the S2007 scheme. The damage to the photosynthesis of sunlit leaves is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 times that of shaded leaves in the S2007 scheme but shows limited differences in the L2013 scheme. Though with large discrepancies in offline responses, the two schemes yield a similar magnitude of feedback to surface meteorology and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air quality. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced damage to transpiration increases national sensible heat by 3.2–6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (8.9 % to 16.2 %), while reducing latent heat by 3.3–6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.6 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.4 %), leading to a 0.2–0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in surface air temperature and a 2.2 %–3.9 % reduction in relative humidity. Meanwhile, surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations on average increase by 2.6–4.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, due to the inhibitions of stomatal uptake and the anomalous enhancement in isoprene emissions, the latter of which is attributed to the surface warming by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling. Our results highlight the importance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> control in China due to its adverse effects on ecosystem functions, global warming, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2023YFF0805403</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42293323</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e349">Surface ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is one of the most enduring air pollutants affecting air quality in China, with detrimental effects on human health and ecosystem functions (Monks et al., 2015). Long-term observations and numerical simulations have shown that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> affects stomatal conductance (Li et al., 2017), accelerates vegetation aging (Feng et al., 2015), and reduces photosynthesis (Wittig et al., 2007). These negative effects altered carbon allocation (Yue and Unger, 2014; Lombardozzi et al., 2015) and inhibited plant growth (Li et al., 2016b), suppressing ecosystem carbon uptake (Ainsworth et al., 2012). Moreover, these effects have profound implications for global/regional climate and atmospheric environment. Given the significant ecological impacts, a systematic quantification of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage effect in China is of great importance for a better understanding of the side effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution on both regional carbon uptake and climate change.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3974?><p id="d1e396">At present, field experiments on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced vegetation damage have been conducted in China but were mostly confined to individual monitoring sites. For instance, Su et al. (2017) conducted experiments on grassland in Inner Mongolia and found that elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations resulted in a decrease of approximately 20 % in the photosynthetic rate of herbaceous plants. Meta-analysis of tropical, subtropical, and temperate tree species in China found that increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations reduced net photosynthesis and total biomass of Chinese woody plants by 28 % and 14 %, respectively (Li et al., 2017). However, most of these experiments were conducted using open-top chambers with artificially controlled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, rather than actual surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, making it difficult to quantitatively estimate the impact of ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on vegetation productivity. Furthermore, the spatial  coverage of field experiments is limited, which hinders the direct use of observational data for assessing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage in different regions of China.</p>
      <p id="d1e477">Alternatively, numerical models provide a more feasible approach to quantifying the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced vegetation damage from the regional to global scales. Currently, there are three main parameterizations for the calculation of ozone vegetation damage. Felzer et al. (2004) established an empirical scheme based on the Accumulated Ozone exposure over a Threshold of 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (AOT40) within the framework of a terrestrial ecosystem model. They further estimated that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in the United States led to a decrease in net primary productivity (NPP) by 2.6 % to 6.8 % during the period of 1980–1990. However, the AOT40 is related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations alone and ignores the biological regulations on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stomatal uptake, leading to inconsistent tendencies between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution level and plant damage at the drought conditions (Gong et al., 2021). In acknowledgement of such a deficit, Sitch et al. (2007) proposed a semi-mechanistic scheme calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage based on the stomatal uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes and the coupling between stomatal conductance and leaf photosynthesis. Yue and Unger (2014) implemented this scheme into the Yale Interactive terrestrial Biosphere (YIBs) model. Taking into account varied <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivities of different vegetation types, they estimated that surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> led to reductions of 2 %–5 % in the summer gross primary productivity (GPP) in the eastern US from 1998 to 2007. Later, Lombardozzi et al. (2013) conducted a meta-analysis using published chamber data and found different levels of responses to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure between stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. They further implemented the independent response relationships into the Community Land Model (CLM) and estimated that current ozone levels led to a reduction in global GPP by 8 %%–12 % (Lombardozzi et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e599">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stress on vegetation physiology can feed back to affect regional climate. Lombardozzi et al. (2015) employed the CLM model and found that current <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure reduced transpiration by  2 %–2.4 % globally and up to 15 % regionally over the eastern US, Europe, and Southeast Asia, leading to further perturbations in the surface energy balance. In the US, Li et al. (2016a) found that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage reduced latent heat (LH) flux, precipitation, and runoff by 10–27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.9–1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 0.1–0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and increased surface air temperature by 0.6–2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the summer of 2007–2012. In China, Zhu et al. (2022) performed simulations and found that the inclusion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation interaction caused a 5–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease in LH, 0.2–0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in surface air temperature, and 3 % reduction in relative humidity during summers of 2014–2017. Recently, Jin et al. (2023) applied a different regional model and estimated that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure weakened plant transpiration and altered surface heat flux in China, resulting in a significant increase of up to 0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the maximum daytime temperature and decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.74 % in the relative humidity. However, all of these previous estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced feedback to climate were derived using the empirical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage scheme proposed by Lombardozzi et al. (2013), which assumed fixed damage ratios independent of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dose for some vegetation species and, as a result, may have biases in the further estimated feedback to climate.</p>
      <p id="d1e798">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling also has intricate implications for air quality. On one hand, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling can influence meteorological conditions that affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation, ultimately influencing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level (Sadiq et al., 2017). On the other hand, it can also influence biogenic emissions and dry deposition, thereby affecting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Gong et al., 2020). Sadiq et al. (2017) implemented <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) and estimated that surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  concentrations increased 4–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Europe, North America, and China due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling. Using the CLM model with the empirical scheme of Lombardozzi et al. (2013), Zhou et al. (2018) found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced damage on leaf area index (LAI) could lead to changes in global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in boreal summer. Gong et al. (2020) used the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage scheme from Sitch et al. (2007) embedded in a global climate–chemistry–carbon coupled model and estimated that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced stomatal inhibition led to an average surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase of 1.2–2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in eastern China and 1.0–1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in western Europe. Different from the above global simulations with coarse resolutions, regional modeling with a fine resolution can reveal more detail about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling and feedback to surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in China (Zhu et al., 2022; Jin et al., 2023). However, all these regional simulations were carried out using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage scheme of Lombardozzi et al. (2013), limiting the exploration of model uncertainties due to varied <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage schemes.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3975?><p id="d1e1037">In this study, we implemented <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage schemes from both Sitch et al. (2007) and Lombardozzi et al. (2013) into the widely used regional meteorology–chemistry model WRF-Chem (Weather Research and  Forecasting model with Chemistry). We validated the simulated meteorology and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and performed sensitivity experiments to explore the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage to GPP and consequent feedbacks to regional climate and air quality in China. Within the same framework, we compared the differences in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling from two schemes and explored the causes for the discrepancies. We aimed to quantify the modeling uncertainties in the up-to-date estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> impact on regional carbon fluxes and its feedback to regional climate and air quality in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>WRF-Chem model</title>
      <p id="d1e1110">We used WRF-Chem model version 3.9.1 to simulate meteorological fields and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in China. The model includes atmospheric physics and dynamical processes, atmospheric chemistry, and biophysical and biochemical processes (Grell et al., 2005; Skamarock and Klemp, 2008). The model domain is configured with 196 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 160 grid cells at 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution on the Lambert conformal projection and covers the entire mainland China. In the vertical direction, 28 layers are set extending from surface to 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The meteorological initial and boundary conditions were adopted from ERA5 reanalysis produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) at a horizontal resolution of 0.25° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25° (Hersbach et al., 2020). The chemical initial and boundary conditions were generated from the Model for Ozone and Related Chemical Tracer version 4 (MOZART-4), which is available at a horizontal resolution of 1.9° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5° with 56 vertical layers (Emmons et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e1162">Anthropogenic emissions are adopted from the 0.25° Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC) and MIX Asian emission inventory for the other regions (available at <uri>http://meicmodel.org</uri>, last access: 26 March 2024). Biogenic emissions are calculated online using the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (Guenther et al., 2006), which considers the impacts of plant types, weather conditions, and leaf area on vegetation emissions. Atmospheric chemistry is simulated using the Carbon Bond Mechanism version Z (CBM-Z) (Zaveri and Peters, 1999) gas-phase chemistry module coupled with a four-bin sectional Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC) (Zaveri et al., 2008). The photolysis scheme is based on the Madronich fast-TUV photolysis module (Tie et al., 2003). The physical configurations include the Morrison double-moment microphysics scheme (Morrison et al., 2009), the Grell-3 cumulus scheme (Grell et al., 2002), the rapid radiative transfer model longwave radiation scheme (Mlawer et al., 1997), the Goddard shortwave radiation scheme (Chou and Suarez, 1994), the Yonsei University planetary boundary layer scheme (Hong et al., 2006), and the revised MM5 (Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model) Monin–Obukhov surface layer scheme.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Noah-MP model</title>
      <p id="d1e1177">Noah-MP is a land surface model coupled to WRF-Chem, with multiple options for key land–atmosphere interaction processes (Niu et al., 2011). Noah-MP considers the canopy structure with canopy height and crown radius and depicts leaves with prescribed dimensions, orientation, density, and radiometric properties. The model employs a two-stream radiative transfer approach for surface energy and water transfer processes (Dickinson, 1983). Noah-MP is capable of distinguishing photosynthesis pathways between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plants and defines vegetation-specific parameters for leaf photosynthesis and respiration.</p>
      <p id="d1e1202">Noah-MP considers prognostic vegetation growth through the coupling between photosynthesis and stomatal conductance (Farquhar et al., 1980; Ball et al., 1987). The photosynthesis rate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), is calculated as one of three limiting factors as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M97" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>gs</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the RuBisCo-limited photosynthesis rate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the light-limited photosynthesis rate, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the export-limited photosynthesis rate. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>gs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the growing season index, with values ranging from 0 to 1. Stomatal conductance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is computed based on the photosynthetic rate as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M103" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the minimum stomatal conductance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Ball–Berry slope of the conductance–photosynthesis relationship, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the net photosynthesis by subtracting dark respiration from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the leaf surface. The assimilated carbon is allocated to various parts of vegetation (leaf, stem, wood, and root) and soil carbon pools (fast and slow), which determines the variations in the LAI and canopy height. Plant transpiration rate is then estimated using the dynamic LAI and stomatal conductance.  Noah-MP also distinguishes the photosynthesis of sunlit and shaded leaves. Sunlit leaves are more limited by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, while shaded leaves are more constrained by insolation, leading to varied responses to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Scheme for ozone damage on vegetation</title>
      <p id="d1e1482">We implemented the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage schemes proposed by Sitch et al. (2007) (hereafter S2007) and Lombardozzi et al. (2013) (hereafter L2013) into the Noah-MP. In the S2007 scheme, the undamaged fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for net photosynthesis is dependent on the sensitivity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and excessive area-based stomatal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux, which is calculated as the difference between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M118" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">max⁡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are specifically determined for individual plant functional types (PFTs) based on measurements (Table 1). The stomatal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M123" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the reference level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the aerodynamic and boundary layer resistance between leaf surface and reference level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.67 represents the ratio of leaf resistance for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to that for water vapor. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents stomatal resistance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For<?pagebreak page3976?> the S2007 scheme, stomatal conductance is damaged with the same ratio (1-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) as photosynthesis and further affects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. In Noah-MP, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated separately for sunlit and shaded leaves with corresponding stomatal resistance (Text S1 in the Supplement).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1868">Parameters used for the S2007 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage scheme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PFTs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EBF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.075, 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.075, 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.15, 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SHR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1, 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GRA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.4, 0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CRO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.4, 0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1891"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The data source is Sitch et al. (2007). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The plant functional types (PFTs) include evergreen broadleaf forest (EBF), needleleaf forest (NF), deciduous broadleaf forest (DBF), shrubland (SHR), grassland (GRA), and cropland (CRO). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The first number is for high sensitivity and the second is for low sensitivity.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2116">As a comparison, the L2013 scheme applies separate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-damaging relationships for the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance. These independent relationships account for different plant groups and are calculated based on the cumulative uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CUO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under different levels of chronic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure. The leaf-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CUO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is calculated by accumulating stomatal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) from the start of the growing season to the specific time step with mean LAI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 (Lombardozzi et al., 2012), when vegetation is most vulnerable to air pollution episodes. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is only accumulated when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux is above an instantaneous threshold of 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to account for ozone detoxification by vegetation at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (Lombardozzi et al., 2015). We also include a leaf turnover rate for evergreen plants so that the accumulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux does not last beyond the average foliar lifetime. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-damaging ratios depend on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CUO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with empirical linear relationships as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M163" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CUO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CUO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the ozone damage ratios for photosynthesis and stomatal conductance, respectively. The slopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for photosynthesis and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for stomatal conductance) and intercepts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for photosynthesis and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for stomatal conductance) of regression functions are determined based on the meta-analysis of hundreds of measurements (Table 2). The ratios predicted in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) are applied to photosynthesis and stomatal conductance, respectively, to account for their independent responses to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damages. In Noah-MP, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated separately for sunlit and shaded leaves based on corresponding stomatal resistance (Text S1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2509">Slopes and intercepts used for the L2013 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage scheme<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PFTs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EBF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8752</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9125</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.839</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0048</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7823</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DBF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8752</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9125</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SHR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8752</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9125</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GRA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7511</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CRO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7511</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2532"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The data source is Lombardozzi et al. (2015). Due to the data limit, we apply the same sensitivity parameters for EBF, DBF, and SHR.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Observational data</title>
      <p id="d1e2797">We validated the simulated meteorology and air pollutants with observations. The meteorological data were downloaded from the National Meteorological Information Center of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA Meteorological Data Centre, 2023; <uri>http://data.cma.cn/data/detail/dataCode/A.0012.0001.html</uri>, last access: 26 March 2024). The daily averaged surface pressure (PRES), wind speed at a height of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (WS10), relative humidity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and temperature at a height of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (T2) were collected from 839 ground stations. Hourly surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at 1597 sites in China were collected from Chinese National Environmental Monitoring Centre (CNEMC, <uri>https://air.cnemc.cn:18007/</uri>, last access: 26 March 2024).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e2851">We performed seven experiments to quantify the damaging effects of ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on GPP and the feedbacks to regional climate and air quality (Table 3). All simulations are conducted from 1 May to 31 August of 2017, with the first month excluded from the analysis as the spin-up. The control simulations (CRTL) excluded the impact of ozone on vegetation. Three offline simulations were performed with the same settings as the CTRL run, except that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damages were calculated and output without feedback to affect vegetation growth. These offline runs were established using either the S2007 scheme (Offline_SH07 for high sensitivity and Offline_SL07 for low sensitivity) or the L2013 scheme (Offline_L13). As a comparison, three online simulations applied the S2007 scheme (Online_SH07 for high sensitivity<?pagebreak page3977?> and Online_SL07 for low sensitivity) and the L2013 scheme (Online_L13) to estimate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damages to GPP, which further influenced LAI development, leaf transpiration, and dry deposition. The differences between CTRL and online runs indicated the responses of surface meteorology and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced vegetation damages.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2912">Summary of simulation experiments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="17mm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>to vegetable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Scheme</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CRTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Offline_SH07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sitch et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Offline_SL07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sitch et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Offline_L13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lombardozzi et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Online_SH07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sitch et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Online_SL07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sitch et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Online_L13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lombardozzi et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{3}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Model evaluations</title>
      <p id="d1e3057">We compared the simulated summer near-surface temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations to observations. The model reasonably reproduces the spatial pattern of higher near-surface temperature in southeast and northwest and lower temperature over the Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 1a). On the national scale, the near-surface temperature is underestimated with a mean bias (MB) of 1.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but it shows a high correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.96). Unlike temperature, simulated relative humidity is overestimated with a MB of 5.04 % but a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.93 (Fig. 1b). Due to the modeling biases in the topographic effects, simulated wind speed is overestimated by more than 1.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the national scale (Fig. 1c). Such an overestimation was also reported in other studies using WRF models (Hu et al., 2016; Liu and Wang, 2020; Zhu et al., 2022).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3122">Evaluations of simulated summer (June–August) daily (24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> average) <bold>(a)</bold> near-surface temperature, <bold>(b)</bold> relative humidity, <bold>(c)</bold> wind speed, and <bold>(d)</bold> surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in China. The dots represent the site-level observations. The correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), mean biases (MBs), and root mean square error (RMSE) for the comparisons are shown in the lower-left corner of each panel. <italic>Publisher's remark</italic>: please note that Figs. 1–7 contain disputed territories.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3973/2024/acp-24-3973-2024-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3173">Comparisons with the measurements from air quality sites show that the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deviates from the observed mean concentrations by 5.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a spatial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.68. The model reasonably captures the hotspots over the North China Plain though with some overestimations, potentially attributed to uncertain emissions and coarse model resolutions. Such elevated bias in summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a common issue for both global and regional models over Asia. For example, Zhu et al. (2022) reported the overestimated summer average ozone concentration by 13.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in China. Liu and Wang (2020) reached positive biases ranging from 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 13.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using the WRF-CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) model. Overall, the WRF-Chem model shows reasonable performance in the simulation of surface meteorology and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in China.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Offline {$\protect\chem{O_{{3}}}$} damage}?><title>Offline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage</title>
      <p id="d1e3314">We compared the offline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage to photosynthesis between sunlit (PSNSUN) and shaded (PSNSHA) leaves during the summer. The S2007 scheme is dependent on instantaneous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, which peaks in July when both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and stomatal conductance are high (Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplement). For the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution level, the damages are much higher for the sunlit leaves (Fig. 2a and b) than that for the shaded leaves (Fig. 2d and e) because of the higher stomatal conductance linked with the more active photosynthesis for the sunlit leaves. In contrast, the L2013 scheme depends on the accumulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux and assumes constant damages for some PFTs (Table 2), resulting in reductions in the photosynthesis even at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage to photosynthesis of sunlit and shaded leaves increases month by month, reaching a maximum in August (Figs. S1 and S2). We found limited differences in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damages between sunlit (Fig. 2c) and shaded (Fig. 2f) leaves with the L2013 scheme. Observations have reported that surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has limited impacts on the shaded leaves (Wan et al., 2014), consistent with the results simulated by the S2007 scheme.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3419">Offline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage (%) to the summertime photosynthesis of <bold>(a–c)</bold> sunlit and <bold>(d–f)</bold> shaded leaves predicted by the S2007 scheme with <bold>(a, d)</bold> high and <bold>(b, e)</bold> low sensitivities or the <bold>(c, f)</bold> L2013 scheme. The area-weighted percentage changes are shown in the lower-left corner.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3973/2024/acp-24-3973-2024-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3458">The same as Fig. 2 but for the changes in stomatal resistance.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3973/2024/acp-24-3973-2024-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3467">Figure 3 shows the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage to stomatal resistance of sunlit (RSSUN) and shaded (RSSHA) leaves. Overall, the spatial pattern of the changes in stomatal resistance is consistent with those of photosynthesis (Fig. 2) but with opposite signs. Both RSSUN and RSSHA are enhanced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage so as to prevent more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. For the S2007 scheme, RSSUN with high and low sensitivities, respectively increases by 13.43 % (Fig. 3a) and 8.35 % (Fig. 3b), which are higher than the rates of 4.71 % (Fig. 3d) and 2.97 % (Fig. 3e) for RSSHA. These ratios are inversely connected to the changes in the photosynthesis (Fig. 2), suggesting the full coupling of damages between leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. For the L2013 scheme, predicted changes in RSSUN (Fig. 3c) and RSSHA (Fig. 3f) are very similar with the magnitude of 25.3 %–26.3 %. These changes are higher than the loss of  photosynthesis (Fig. 2c and f), suggesting the decoupling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damages to leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance as revealed by the L2013 scheme.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3516">Offline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage (%) to the <bold>(a–c)</bold> gross primary productivity (GPP) and <bold>(d–f)</bold> transpiration rate (TR) predicted by the Sitch scheme with <bold>(a, d)</bold> high and <bold>(b, e)</bold> low sensitivities or the <bold>(c, f)</bold> Lombardozzi scheme. The area-weighted percentage changes are shown in the lower-left corner.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3973/2024/acp-24-3973-2024-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3552">We further assessed the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage to GPP and transpiration (TR). For the S2007 scheme, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> causes damages to national average GPP and TR approximately by 5.5 % with low sensitivity (Fig. 4b and e) and 8.4 % with high sensitivity (Fig. 4a and d) compared to the CTRL simulation. The model predicts high GPP damages over the North China Plain and moderate damages in the southeastern and northeastern regions. In the northwest, GPP damage is very limited due to the low relative humidity (Fig. 1b) that constrains the stomatal uptake. For the L2013 scheme, TR shows uniform reductions exceeding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % in most regions of China, except for the northwest (Fig. 4f), though <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations show a distinct spatial gradient (Fig. 1d). The changes in the GPP are similar to that of TR but with lower inhibitions (Fig. 4c).<?pagebreak page3978?> On average, the GPP reduction with the L2013 scheme is 2.5–3.9 times that predicted with the S2007 scheme. The most significant differences are located in Tibetan Plateau with limited damages in S2007 but strong inhibitions of both GPP and TR in L2013. The low temperature (Fig. 1a) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. 1d) jointly constrain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stomatal uptake (Fig. S3 in the Supplement), leading to low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damages over Tibetan Plateau with the S2007 scheme. However, the L2013 scheme applies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8021 for grassland (Table 2), suggesting strong baseline damages up to 20 %, even with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CUO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 over Tibetan Plateau where the grassland dominates (Fig. S4 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The {$\protect\chem{O_{{3}}}$}--vegetation feedback to surface energy and meteorology}?><title>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation feedback to surface energy and meteorology</title>
      <p id="d1e3682">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage causes contrasting responses in surface sensible heat (SH) and LH (Fig. 5). For the S2007 scheme, the SH fluxes on average increase by 3.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (8.85 %) with low sensitivity (Fig. 5b) and 5.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2<?pagebreak page3979?></mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (16.22 %) with high sensitivity (Fig. 5a). The maximum enhancement is located in southern China, where the increased stomatal resistance (Fig. 3a) reduces transpiration and the consequent heat dissipation. Meanwhile, LH fluxes decrease by 3.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5.58 %) with low sensitivity (Fig. 5e) and 6.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (15.29 %) with high sensitivity (Fig. 5d), following the reduction in transpiration (Fig. 4d and e). We found similar changes in surface energy by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling between the S2007 and L2013 schemes. The SH shows the same hotspots over southern China with national average increase of 12.85 % (Fig. 5c), which is within the range of 8.85 % to 16.22 % predicted by the S2007 scheme. The LH largely decreases in central and northern China with the mean reduction of 17.4 % (Fig. 5f), which is close to the magnitude of 15.29 % predicted with the S2007 scheme using the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity (Fig. 5d). Although the offline damages to GPP and TR are much larger with the L2013 than S2007 (Fig. 4), their feedback to surface energy shows consistent spatial pattern and magnitude (Fig. 5), likely because the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition in S2007 has the same diurnal cycle with energy fluxes, while the L2013 scheme shows almost constant inhibitions throughout the day (Fig. S5 in the Supplement). The zero or near-zero slope parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the L2013 scheme (Table 2) lead to insensitive responses of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to the variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CUO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a result, there were very limited diurnal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage with the L2013 scheme. However, the strong nighttime damages in L2013 have limited contributions to the changes in surface energy, which usually peaks at the daytime.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3842">The feedback of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation interaction to surface <bold>(a–c)</bold> sensible and <bold>(d–f)</bold> latent heat fluxes in the summer predicted by the S2007 scheme with <bold>(a, d)</bold> high and <bold>(b, e)</bold> low sensitivities or the <bold>(c, f)</bold> L2013 scheme. The relative changes are shown with area-weighted percentage changes indicated in the lower-left corner.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3973/2024/acp-24-3973-2024-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3881">The same as Fig. 5 but for changes in <bold>(a–c)</bold> air temperature and <bold>(d–f)</bold> relative humidity at 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3973/2024/acp-24-3973-2024-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3904">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced damages to stomatal conductance weaken plant transpiration and thus slow down the heat dissipation at the surface, leading to the higher temperature but lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in China (Fig. 6). On the national scale, temperature increases by 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage with the high sensitivity (Fig. 6a) and  0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the low sensitivity<?pagebreak page3980?> (Fig. 6b) predicted using the S2007 scheme. A similar warming is predicted with the L2013 scheme, except that temperature shows moderate enhancement over Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 6c). The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases by 3.68 % with the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity (Fig. 6d) and 2.22 % with the low sensitivity (Fig. 6e) in response to the suppressed plant transpiration. A stronger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.85 % is achieved with the L2013 scheme, which predicts the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reductions in the north (Fig. 6f).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The {$\protect\chem{O_{{3}}}$}--vegetation feedback to air quality}?><title>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation feedback to air quality</title>
      <p id="d1e4020">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced inhibition on stomatal resistance leads to a significant increase in surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, particularly in eastern China (Fig. 7a–c). The main cause of such feedback is the reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dry deposition, which exacerbates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in China. For the S2007 scheme, this positive feedback can reach up to 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with high sensitivity (Fig. 7a) and 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with low sensitivity (Fig. 7b) over the North China Plain. On the national scale, surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enhances 4.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5.08 %) with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity and 2.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (3.04 %) with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity through the coupling to vegetation. For the L2013 scheme, the changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Fig. 7c) are comparable to that of the S2007 scheme with high sensitivity (Fig. 7a), except that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement is stronger in the southeast but weaker in the northeast.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4202">The feedback of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation interaction to surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and isoprene emissions in the summer predicted by the S2007 scheme with <bold>(a, d)</bold> high and <bold>(b, e)</bold> low sensitivities or the <bold>(c, f)</bold> L2013 scheme. The area-weighted percentage changes are shown in the lower-left corner.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3973/2024/acp-24-3973-2024-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4242">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling also increases surface isoprene emissions. For the S2007 scheme, isoprene emissions increase by 6.13 % with high sensitivity (Fig. 7d) and 3.43 % with low sensitivity (Fig. 7e), with regional hotspots in the North China Plain and northeastern and southern regions. The predictions using the L2013 scheme (Fig. 7f) show very similar patterns and magnitude of isoprene changes to the S2007 scheme with high sensitivity. Such an enhancement in isoprene emissions is related to the additional surface warming by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation interactions (Fig. 6a–c). In turn, the increased isoprene emissions contribute to the deterioration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution in China.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3981?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e4287">In this study, we explored the feedback of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling to surface meteorology and air quality in China using two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage schemes embedded in a regional meteorology–chemistry coupled model. The two schemes predicted distinct spatial patterns with much larger magnitude of GPP loss in the L2013 scheme than that in the S2007 scheme. We further  distinguished the leaf responses with different illuminations. For the S2007 scheme, the damages to photosynthesis of sunlit leaves are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 times of that to shaded leaves. However, for the L2013 scheme, limited differences are found between the sunlit and shaded leaves. The damages to leaf photosynthesis increase stomatal resistance, leading to the reductions in the transpiration but enhancement of sensible heat due to the less efficient heat dissipation. These changes in surface energy and water fluxes feed back to increase surface temperature but decrease relative humidity. Although the L2013 scheme predicts much stronger offline damages, the feedback causes a very similar pattern and magnitude in surface warming to the S2007 scheme. Consequently, surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases due to the stomatal closure and isoprene emissions enhance due to the anomalous warming.</p>
      <p id="d1e4330">Our predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage to GPP was within the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 %, as estimated in previous studies using different models and/or parameterizations over China (Ren et al., 2011; Lombardozzi et al., 2015; Yue and Unger, 2015; Sadiq et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2022; Jin et al., 2023). Such a wide span revealed the large uncertainties in the estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> impacts on ecosystem functions. In this study, we employed two schemes and compared their differences. With the S2007 scheme, we predicted GPP reductions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.5 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.5 % in China. This is similar to the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % estimated by Yue and Unger (2015) using the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damage scheme. However, it is lower than the estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.1 % predicted by Xie et al. (2019), likely due to the slight overestimation of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the latter study. With the L2013 scheme, we predicted much larger GPP reductions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.4 %. However, this value was still lower than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.9 % in Jin et al. (2023) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 %<?pagebreak page3982?> in Zhu et al. (2022) using the same L2013 scheme embedded in WRF-Chem model, though all studies showed similar spatial patterns in the GPP reductions. Such differences were likely attributed to the varied model configuration, as we ran the model from May while the other studies started from the beginning of the year. The longer time for the accumulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stomatal uptake in other studies might result in higher damages than our estimates with the L2013 scheme.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3983?><p id="d1e4467">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling caused strong feedback to surface meteorology and air quality. Our simulations with either scheme revealed that surface SH increases by 2–28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and LH decreases by 4–32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over eastern China, consistent with the estimates of 5–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by Zhu et al. (2022) using the WRF-Chem model with the L2013 scheme. Consequently, surface air temperature on average increases by 0.23–0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while relative humidity decreases by 2.2 %–3.8 %, which is similar to the warming of 0.2–0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction of 3 %, as predicted by Zhu et al. (2022). However, these changes in surface energy flux and meteorology are much higher than that in Jin et al. (2023), likely because the latter focuses on the perturbations averaged throughout the year instead of summer period as in this study and Zhu et al. (2022). We further predicted that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage increased surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 1.0–3.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in China, similar to the 2.35–4.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated for eastern China using a global model (Gong et al., 2020). Regionally, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement reached as high as 7.84–14.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the North China Plain, consistent with the maximum value of 11.76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the same domain predicted by Zhu et al. (2022). However, limited feedback to surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was predicted in Jin et al. (2023), mainly because the decreased dry deposition had comparable but opposite effects to the decreased isoprene emissions due to the reductions in the LAI. Such a discrepancy was likely caused by the stronger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inhibition in Jin et al. (2023), following the longer period of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation, consequently exacerbating the negative impacts of LAI reduction on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production.</p>
      <p id="d1e4716">There were some limitations in our parameterizations and simulations. First, we predicted increases in the isoprene emissions in eastern China mainly due to the increased leaf temperature, which is in line with previous studies (Sadiq et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2022). However, isoprene production is coupled to photosynthesis. There is empirical evidence showing that a high dose of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure reduces isoprene emissions when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure is prolonged enough to suppress photosynthesis (Bellucci et al., 2023). Inclusion of such negative feedback might alleviate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced enhancement in isoprene emissions. Second, the WRF-Chem model slightly overestimated summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, which could exacerbate the damages to stomatal conductance and the subsequent feedback. Third, the S2007 scheme employed the coupled responses in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage. However, some  observations revealed that stomatal response is slow under long-term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure, resulting in the loss of stomatal function and decoupling from photosynthesis (Calatayud et al., 2007; Lombardozzi et al., 2012). The L2013 scheme considered the decoupling between photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. However, this scheme shows no significantly different changes for sunlit and shaded leaves. In addition, the calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CUO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heavily relied on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold and accumulation period, leading to varied responses among different studies using the same scheme. Furthermore, the slopes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity in the L2013 scheme were set to zero for some PFTs, leading to constant damages independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CUO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Fourth, the current knowledge of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effects on stomatal conductance was primarily derived from leaf-level measurements (Matyssek et al., 2008), which were much fewer compared to that for photosynthesis. The limited data availability and lack of inter-PFT responses constrain the development of empirical parameterizations.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3984?><p id="d1e4836">Despite these limitations, our study provided the first comparison of different parameterizations in simulating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation interactions. We found similar feedbacks to surface energy and meteorology though the two schemes showed varied magnitude and distribution in the offline responses of GPP and stomatal conductance to surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The main cause of such inconsistency lay in the low feedback of damages in L2013, with some unrealistic inhibitions of ecosystem functions at night and over the regions with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level. Such similarity provides a solid foundation for the exploration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–vegetation coupling using different schemes. The positive feedback of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation damage to surface air temperature and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations posed emerging but ignored threats to both climate change and air quality in China.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4911">The observed hourly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were obtained from Chinese National Environmental Monitoring Centre (<uri>https://air.cnemc.cn:18007/</uri>; CNEMC, 2023). The observed meteorological data were obtained from the National Meteorological Information Center of the China Meteorological Administration (<uri>http://data.cma.cn/data/detail/dataCode/A.0012.0001.html</uri>; CMA, 2023). The MEIC and MIX emission inventory are available at <uri>http://meicmodel.org.cn/?page_id=560</uri> (MEIC Team, 2018a) and <uri>http://meicmodel.org.cn/?page_id=89</uri> (MEIC Team, 2018b).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4937">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3973-2024-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3973-2024-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4946">XY conceived the study. XY and JC designed the research and carried out the simulations. JC completed data analysis and the first draft. MM provided useful comments on the paper. XY reviewed and edited the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4952">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <?pagebreak page3985?><p id="d1e4958">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4964">The authors are grateful to the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that have improved this study.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4969">This study has been jointly funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2023YFF0805403), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42293323), and Jiangsu Funding Program for Excellent Postdoctoral Talent (grant no. 2023ZB737).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4975">This paper was edited by Leiming Zhang and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ainsworth, E. A., Yendrek, C. R., Sitch, S., Collins, W. J., and Emberson, L. D.: The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 63, 637–661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevarplant-042110-103829" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurevarplant-042110-103829</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation> Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., and Berry, J. A.: A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions, Prog. Photosynthesis, 4, 221–224, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation>Bellucci, M., Locato, V., Sharkey, T. D., Gara, D., and Loreto, F.: Isoprene emission by plants in polluted environments, J. Plant Interact., 18, 2266463, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2023.2266463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/17429145.2023.2266463</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Calatayud, V., Cerveró, J., and Sanz, M. J.: Foliar, physiologial and growth responses of four maple species exposed to ozone, Water Air Soil Pollut., 185, 239–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9446-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11270-007-9446-5</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation> Chou, M. D. and Suarez, M. J.: An efficient thermal infrared radiation parameterization for use in general circulation models, NASA Tech. Memo., 104506, 3, Maryland, USA, 85 pp., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>CMA: Basic ground meteorological observation data, Meteorological Data Centre [data set], <uri>http://data.cma.cn/data/detail/dataCode/A.0012.0001.html</uri> (last access: 26 March 2024), 2023 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>CNEMC: Real-time National Air Quality, Chinese National Environmental Monitoring Centre [data set], <uri>https://air.cnemc.cn:18007/</uri> (last access: 26 March 2024), 2023 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Dickinson, R. E.: Land surface processes and climate – Surface albedos and energy balance, Adv. Geophys., 25, 305–353, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60176-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60176-4</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation>Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., Pfister, G. G., Fillmore, D., Granier, C., Guenther, A., Kinnison, D., Laepple, T., Orlando, J., Tie, X., Tyndall, G., Wiedinmyer, C., Baughcum, S. L., and Kloster, S.: Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 43–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Farquhar, G. D., Caemmerer, S. V., and Berry, J. A.: A biochemicalmodel of photosynthetic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assimilation in leaves of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species, Planta, 149, 78–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00386231" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00386231</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Felzer, B., Kicklighter, D., Melillo, J., Wang, C., Zhuang, Q., and Prinn, R.: Effects of ozone on net primary production and carbon sequestration in the conterminous United States using a biogeochemistry model, Tellus B, 56, 230–248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00097.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00097.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Feng, Z., Hu, E., Wang, X., Jiang, L., and Liu, X.: Ground-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution and its impacts on food crops in China: A review, Environ. Pollut., 199, 42–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.016</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>Gong, C., Lei, Y., Ma, Y., Yue, X., and Liao, H.: Ozone– vegetation feedback through dry deposition and isoprene emissions in a global chemistry–carbon–climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3841–3857, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-203841-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-203841-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Gong, C., Yue, X., Liao, H., and Ma, Y.: A humidity-based exposure index representing ozone damage effects on vegetation, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 044030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abecbb" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/abecbb</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation> Grell, G. A., McKeen, S., Michalakes, J., Bao, J.-W., Trainer, M., and Hsie, E.-Y.: Real-time simultaneous prediction of air pollution and weather during the Houston 2000 Field Experiment, presented at the 4th Conference on Atmospheric Chemistry: Atmospheric Chemistry and Texas Field Study, 13–17 January, American Meteorological Society, Orlando, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G., Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chem- istry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron, C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.: A new vertical diffusion package with explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2318–2341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR3199.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>Hu, J., Chen, J., Ying, Q., and Zhang, H.: One-year simulation of ozone and particulate matter in China using WRF/CMAQ modeling system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10333–10350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3986?><ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>Jin, Z., Yan, D., Zhang, Z., Li, M., Wang, T., Huang, X., Xie, M., Li S and Zhuang.: Effects of elevated ozone exposure on regional meteorology and air quality in China through ozone–vegetation coupling. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD038119. <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD038119</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Mahalov, A., and Hyde, P.: Simulating the impacts of chronic ozone exposure on plant conductance and photosynthesis, and on the regional hydroclimate using WRF/Chem, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 114017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114017</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>Li, P., Calatayud, V., Gao, F., Uddling, J., and Feng, Z. Z.: Differences in ozone sensitivity among woody species are related to leaf morphology and antioxidant levels, Tree Physiol., 36, 1105–1116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/tpw042</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>Li, P., Feng, Z., Catalayud, V., Yuan, X., Xu, Y., and Paoletti, E.: A meta-analysis on growth, physiological, and biochemical responses of woody species to ground-level ozone highlights the role of plant functional types, Plant Cell Environ., 40, 2369–2380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/pce.13043</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation>Liu, Y. and Wang, T.: Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017 – Part 1: The complex and varying roles of meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6305–6321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6305-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-6305-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation>Lombardozzi, D., Levis, S., Bonan, G., and Sparks, J. P.: Predicting photosynthesis and transpiration responses to ozone: decoupling modeled photosynthesis and stomatal conductance, Biogeosciences, 9, 3113–3130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-31132012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-31132012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 25?><mixed-citation>Lombardozzi, D., Sparks, J. P., and Bonan, G.: Integrating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influences on terrestrial processes: photosynthetic and stomatal response data available for regional and global modeling, Biogeosciences, 10, 6815–6831, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6815-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6815-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Lombardozzi, D., Levis, S., Bonan, G., Hess, P. G., and Sparks, J. P.: The influence of chronic ozone exposure on global carbon and water cycles, J. Climate, 28, 292–305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00223.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00223.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation>Matyssek, R., Sandermann, H., Wieser, G., Booker, F., Cieslik, S., Musselman, R., and Ernst, D.: The challenge of making ozone risk assessment for forest trees more mechanistic, Environ. Pollut., 156, 567–582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.017</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>MEIC Team: MEIC, MEIC Model​​​​​​​, The Multi-resolution Emission Inventory Model for Climate and Air Pollution Research [data set], <uri>http://meicmodel.org.cn/?page_id=560</uri> (last access: 26 March 2024), 2018a (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>MEIC Team: MIX Asia, MEIC Model, The Multi-resolution Emission Inventory Model for Climate and Air Pollution Research [data set], <uri>http://meicmodel.org.cn/?page_id=89</uri> (last access: 26 March 2024), 2018b (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S. A.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 16663–16682, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00237</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.: Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one- and two-moment schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 991–1007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008MWR2556.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Niu, G. Y., Yang, Z. L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M., Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.: The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015139</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Ren, W., Tian, H., Tao, B., Chappelka, A., Sun, G., Lu, C., Liu, M., Chen, G., and Xu, X.: Impacts of tropospheric ozone and climate change on net primary productivity and net carbon exchange of China's forest ecosystems, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 20, 391–406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00606.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00606.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation>Sadiq, M., Tai, A. P. K., Lombardozzi, D., and Val Martin, M.: Effects of ozone–vegetation coupling on surface ozone air quality via biogeochemical and meteorological feedbacks, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3055–3066, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3055-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3055-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J., and Huntingford, C.: Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink, Nature, 448, 791–794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06059</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>Skamarock, W. C. and Klemp, J. B.: A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3465-3485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.037</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Su, B., Zhou, M., Xu, H., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Su, H., and Xiang B.: Photosynthesis and biochemical responses to elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Plantago major and Sonchus oleraceus growing in a lowland habitat of northern China, J. Environ. Sci., 53, 113–121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.05.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2016.05.011</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>Tie, X. X., Madronich, S., Walters, S., Zhang, R. Y., Rasch, P., and Collins, W.: Effect of clouds on photolysis and oxidants in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003659</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 38?><mixed-citation>Wan, W., Manning, W. J., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Sun, X., and Zhang, Q.: Ozone and ozone injury on plants in and around Beijing, China, Environ Pollut., 191, 215–222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.02.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2014.02.035</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation>Wittig, V. E., Ainsworth, E. A., and Long, S. P.: To what extent do current and projected increases in surface ozone affect photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of trees? A metaanalytic review of the last 3 decades of experiments, Plant Cell Environ., 30, 1150–1162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01717.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01717.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>Xie, X., Wang, T., Yue, X., Li, S., Zhuang, B., Wang, M., and Yang, X.: Numerical modeling of ozone damage to plants and its effects on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in China, Atmos. Environ., 217, 116970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116970" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116970</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>Yue, X. and Unger, N.: Ozone vegetation damage effects on gross primary productivity in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9137–9153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9137-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-9137-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3987?><ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Yue, X. and Unger, N.: The Yale Interactive terrestrial Biosphere model version 1.0: description, evaluation and implementation into NASA GISS ModelE2, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2399–2417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2399-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-2399-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A. and Peters, L. K.: A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large-scale applications, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 30387–30415, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900876" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900876</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.: Model for simulating aerosol interactions and chemistry (MOSAIC), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D13204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008782</ext-link>, 2008. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>Zhou, S. S., Tai, A. P. K., Sun, S., Sadiq, M., Heald, C. L., and Geddes, J. A.: Coupling between surface ozone and leaf area index in a chemical transport model: strength of feedback and implications for ozone air quality and vegetation health, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14133–14148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14133-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14133-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Zhu, J., Tai, A. P. K., and Hung Lam Yim, S.: Effects of ozone–vegetation interactions on meteorology and air quality in China using a two-way coupled land–atmosphere model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 765–782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-765-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-765-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Simulation of ozone–vegetation coupling and feedback in China using multiple ozone damage schemes</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ainsworth, E. A., Yendrek, C. R., Sitch, S., Collins, W. J., and Emberson, L. D.: The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 63, 637–661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevarplant-042110-103829" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevarplant-042110-103829</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., and Berry, J. A.:
A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions, Prog. Photosynthesis, 4, 221–224, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bellucci, M., Locato, V., Sharkey, T. D., Gara, D., and Loreto, F.:
Isoprene emission by plants in polluted environments, J. Plant Interact., 18, 2266463, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2023.2266463" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2023.2266463</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Calatayud, V., Cerveró, J., and Sanz, M. J.:
Foliar, physiologial and growth responses of four maple species exposed to ozone, Water Air Soil Pollut., 185, 239–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9446-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9446-5</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chou, M. D. and Suarez, M. J.:
An efficient thermal infrared radiation parameterization for use in general circulation models, NASA Tech. Memo., 104506, 3, Maryland, USA, 85 pp., 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
CMA: Basic ground meteorological observation data, Meteorological Data Centre [data set], <a href="http://data.cma.cn/data/detail/dataCode/A.0012.0001.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 26 March 2024), 2023 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
CNEMC: Real-time National Air Quality, Chinese National Environmental Monitoring Centre [data set], <a href="https://air.cnemc.cn:18007/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 26 March 2024), 2023 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dickinson, R. E.:
Land surface processes and climate – Surface albedos and energy balance, Adv. Geophys., 25, 305–353, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60176-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60176-4</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., Pfister, G. G., Fillmore, D., Granier, C., Guenther, A., Kinnison, D., Laepple, T., Orlando, J., Tie, X., Tyndall, G., Wiedinmyer, C., Baughcum, S. L., and Kloster, S.:
Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 43–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Farquhar, G. D., Caemmerer, S. V., and Berry, J. A.:
A biochemicalmodel of photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation in leaves of C<sub>3</sub> species, Planta, 149, 78–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00386231" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00386231</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Felzer, B., Kicklighter, D., Melillo, J., Wang, C., Zhuang, Q., and Prinn, R.:
Effects of ozone on net primary production and carbon sequestration in the conterminous United States using a biogeochemistry model, Tellus B, 56, 230–248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00097.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00097.x</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, Z., Hu, E., Wang, X., Jiang, L., and Liu, X.:
Ground-level O<sub>3</sub> pollution and its impacts on food crops in China: A review, Environ. Pollut., 199, 42–48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.016</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gong, C., Lei, Y., Ma, Y., Yue, X., and Liao, H.:
Ozone– vegetation feedback through dry deposition and isoprene emissions in a global chemistry–carbon–climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3841–3857, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-203841-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-203841-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gong, C., Yue, X., Liao, H., and Ma, Y.:
A humidity-based exposure index representing ozone damage effects on vegetation, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 044030, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abecbb" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abecbb</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grell, G. A., McKeen, S., Michalakes, J., Bao, J.-W., Trainer, M., and Hsie, E.-Y.:
Real-time simultaneous prediction of air pollution and weather during the Houston 2000 Field Experiment, presented at the 4th Conference on Atmospheric Chemistry: Atmospheric Chemistry and Texas Field Study, 13–17 January, American Meteorological Society, Orlando, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G., Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.:
Fully coupled “online” chem- istry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron, C.:
Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.:
The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.:
A new vertical diffusion package with explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2318–2341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, J., Chen, J., Ying, Q., and Zhang, H.:
One-year simulation of ozone and particulate matter in China using WRF/CMAQ modeling system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10333–10350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10333-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jin, Z., Yan, D., Zhang, Z., Li, M., Wang, T., Huang, X., Xie, M., Li S and Zhuang.:
Effects of elevated ozone exposure on regional meteorology and air quality in China through ozone–vegetation coupling. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD038119. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038119</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Mahalov, A., and Hyde, P.:
Simulating the impacts of chronic ozone exposure on plant conductance and photosynthesis, and on the regional hydroclimate using WRF/Chem, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 114017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114017</a>, 2016a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, P., Calatayud, V., Gao, F., Uddling, J., and Feng, Z. Z.:
Differences in ozone sensitivity among woody species are related to leaf morphology and antioxidant levels, Tree Physiol., 36, 1105–1116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw042</a>, 2016b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, P., Feng, Z., Catalayud, V., Yuan, X., Xu, Y., and Paoletti, E.:
A meta-analysis on growth, physiological, and biochemical responses of woody species to ground-level ozone highlights the role of plant functional types, Plant Cell Environ., 40, 2369–2380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13043</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y. and Wang, T.:
Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017 – Part 1: The complex and varying roles of meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6305–6321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6305-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6305-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lombardozzi, D., Levis, S., Bonan, G., and Sparks, J. P.:
Predicting photosynthesis and transpiration responses to ozone: decoupling modeled photosynthesis and stomatal conductance, Biogeosciences, 9, 3113–3130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-31132012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-31132012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lombardozzi, D., Sparks, J. P., and Bonan, G.:
Integrating O<sub>3</sub> influences on terrestrial processes: photosynthetic and stomatal response data available for regional and global modeling, Biogeosciences, 10, 6815–6831, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6815-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6815-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lombardozzi, D., Levis, S., Bonan, G., Hess, P. G., and Sparks, J. P.:
The influence of chronic ozone exposure on global carbon and water cycles, J. Climate, 28, 292–305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00223.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00223.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matyssek, R., Sandermann, H., Wieser, G., Booker, F., Cieslik, S., Musselman, R., and Ernst, D.:
The challenge of making ozone risk assessment for forest trees more mechanistic, Environ. Pollut., 156, 567–582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.017</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
MEIC Team: MEIC, MEIC Model​​​​​​​, The Multi-resolution Emission Inventory Model for Climate and Air Pollution Research [data set], <a href="http://meicmodel.org.cn/?page_id=560" target="_blank"/> (last access: 26 March 2024), 2018a (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
MEIC Team: MIX Asia, MEIC Model, The Multi-resolution Emission Inventory Model for Climate and Air Pollution Research [data set], <a href="http://meicmodel.org.cn/?page_id=89" target="_blank"/> (last access: 26 March 2024), 2018b (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S. A.:
Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 16663–16682, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.:
Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.:
Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one- and two-moment schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 991–1007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niu, G. Y., Yang, Z. L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M., Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.:
The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ren, W., Tian, H., Tao, B., Chappelka, A., Sun, G., Lu, C., Liu, M., Chen, G., and Xu, X.:
Impacts of tropospheric ozone and climate change on net primary productivity and net carbon exchange of China's forest ecosystems, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 20, 391–406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00606.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00606.x</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sadiq, M., Tai, A. P. K., Lombardozzi, D., and Val Martin, M.:
Effects of ozone–vegetation coupling on surface ozone air quality via biogeochemical and meteorological feedbacks, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3055–3066, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3055-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3055-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J., and Huntingford, C.:
Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink, Nature, 448, 791–794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06059</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Skamarock, W. C. and Klemp, J. B.:
A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3465-3485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.037</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, B., Zhou, M., Xu, H., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Su, H., and Xiang B.:
Photosynthesis and biochemical responses to elevated O<sub>3</sub> in Plantago major and Sonchus oleraceus growing in a lowland habitat of northern China, J. Environ. Sci., 53, 113–121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.05.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.05.011</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tie, X. X., Madronich, S., Walters, S., Zhang, R. Y., Rasch, P., and Collins, W.:
Effect of clouds on photolysis and oxidants in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003659" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003659</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wan, W., Manning, W. J., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Sun, X., and Zhang, Q.:
Ozone and ozone injury on plants in and around Beijing, China, Environ Pollut., 191, 215–222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.02.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.02.035</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wittig, V. E., Ainsworth, E. A., and Long, S. P.:
To what extent do current and projected increases in surface ozone affect photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of trees? A metaanalytic review of the last 3 decades of experiments, Plant Cell Environ., 30, 1150–1162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01717.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01717.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xie, X., Wang, T., Yue, X., Li, S., Zhuang, B., Wang, M., and Yang, X.:
Numerical modeling of ozone damage to plants and its effects on atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in China, Atmos. Environ., 217, 116970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116970" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116970</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yue, X. and Unger, N.:
Ozone vegetation damage effects on gross primary productivity in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9137–9153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9137-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9137-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yue, X. and Unger, N.:
The Yale Interactive terrestrial Biosphere model version 1.0: description, evaluation and implementation into NASA GISS ModelE2, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2399–2417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2399-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2399-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaveri, R. A. and Peters, L. K.:
A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large-scale applications, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 30387–30415, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900876" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900876</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D., and Peters, L. K.:
Model for simulating aerosol interactions and chemistry (MOSAIC), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D13204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008782</a>, 2008.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, S. S., Tai, A. P. K., Sun, S., Sadiq, M., Heald, C. L., and Geddes, J. A.:
Coupling between surface ozone and leaf area index in a chemical transport model: strength of feedback and implications for ozone air quality and vegetation health, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14133–14148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14133-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14133-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhu, J., Tai, A. P. K., and Hung Lam Yim, S.:
Effects of ozone–vegetation interactions on meteorology and air quality in China using a two-way coupled land–atmosphere model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 765–782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-765-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-765-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
