<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-24-3217-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>Impacts of ice-nucleating particles on cirrus clouds and radiation derived from global model simulations with MADE3 in EMAC</article-title><alt-title>Impacts of ice-nucleating particles on cirrus clouds</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Impacts of ice-nucleating particles on cirrus clouds}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~G.~Beer et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Beer</surname><given-names>Christof G.</given-names></name>
          <email>christof.beer@dlr.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3815-0007</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Hendricks</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Righi</surname><given-names>Mattia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-5950</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Christof G. Beer (christof.beer@dlr.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>March</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>3217</fpage><lpage>3240</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>August</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>September</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20</day><month>December</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2024</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e98">Atmospheric aerosols can act as ice-nucleating particles (INPs) and influence the formation and the microphysical properties of cirrus clouds, resulting in distinct climate effects. We employ a global aerosol–climate model, including a two-moment cloud microphysical scheme and a parameterization for aerosol-induced ice formation in cirrus clouds, to quantify the climate impact of INPs on cirrus clouds (simulated period 2001–2010). The model considers mineral dust, soot, crystalline ammonium sulfate, and glassy organics as INPs in the cirrus regime. Several sensitivity experiments are performed to analyse various aspects of the simulated INP–cirrus effect regarding (i) the ice-nucleating potential of the INPs, (ii) the inclusion of ammonium sulfate and organic particles as INPs in the model, and (iii) the model representations of vertical updraughts. The resulting global radiative forcing of the total INP–cirrus effect, considering all different INP types, assuming a smaller and a larger ice-nucleating potential of INPs, to explore the range of possible forcings due to uncertainties in the freezing properties of INPs, is simulated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. While the simulated impact of glassy organic INPs is mostly small and not statistically significant, ammonium sulfate INPs contribute a considerable radiative forcing, which is nearly as large as the combined effect of mineral dust and soot INPs. Additionally, the anthropogenic INP–cirrus effect is analysed considering the difference between present-day (2014) and pre-industrial conditions (1750) and amounts to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming a larger ice-nucleating potential of INPs. In a further sensitivity experiment we analyse the effect of highly efficient INPs proposed for cirrus cloud seeding as a means to reduce global warming by climate engineering. However, the results indicate that this approach risks an overseeding of cirrus clouds and often results in positive radiative forcings of up to 86 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on number concentration of seeded INPs. Idealized experiments with prescribed vertical velocities highlight the crucial role of the model dynamics for the simulated INP–cirrus effects. For example, resulting forcings increase about 1 order of magnitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">340</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) when increasing the prescribed vertical velocity (from 1 to 50 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The large discrepancy in the magnitude of the simulated INP–cirrus effect between different model studies emphasizes the need for future detailed analyses and efforts to reduce this uncertainty and constrain the resulting climate impact of INPs.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Helmholtz Association</funding-source>
<award-id>Initiative and Networking Fund</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page3218?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e221">Atmospheric aerosol particles can exert various influences on the climate system. Aerosols change the Earth's radiation budget by directly interacting with solar and terrestrial radiation through absorption and scattering <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.1"/>. Importantly, aerosol particles can also act as cloud condensation nuclei and ice-nucleating particles, consequently influencing the formation of cloud droplets and ice crystals and leading to additional indirect climate effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.2"/>. However, these aerosol–cloud interactions still pose several remaining open questions and are the subject of ongoing research activities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e233">Especially the knowledge about the effect of ice-nucleating particles (INPs) on cirrus clouds and the resulting climate effects is highly uncertain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.4"/>. Cirrus clouds typically exert a warming effect on the global climate due to their strong absorption of outgoing terrestrial radiation that exceeds the reflection of solar radiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.5"/>. INPs contribute to the climate impacts of cirrus by changing the microphysical properties of cirrus clouds. Compared to the homogeneous freezing of liquid aerosols, INPs can initiate heterogeneous nucleation of ice crystals at lower supersaturations with respect to ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.6"/>. The resulting competition mechanism between heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation for the available supersaturated water vapour critically depends on the abundance of INPs and their freezing properties and can induce substantial changes in the microphysical properties of clouds, e.g. via changes in ice crystal number concentration and ice crystal sizes, which in turn influence the cloud optical thickness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.7"/>. To characterize the global radiative impact of INPs the term “radiative forcing” (RF) is used, which is defined as the net change of the Earth’s energy balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.8"/>, i.e. downward shortwave plus upward longwave radiative flux, due to some imposed perturbation (the impact of INPs on cirrus clouds, in this study).</p>
      <p id="d1e251">In the past, several global modelling studies were performed to evaluate the radiative impact induced by INP effects on cirrus and mixed-phase clouds. While most studies agree on the sign of the global INP effect, i.e. a net negative radiative forcing leading to a cooling of the climate system, there are conflicting results concerning its magnitude. Estimates range from statistically insignificant effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.9"/> to negative forcings ranging from a few <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to several <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.10"/> or even positive forcings of the order of 100 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.11"/>. However, the comparison of different studies is complicated as (i) different model systems and techniques are used, (ii) different INP species with varying freezing properties are considered, and (iii) different sensitivities and effects are analysed. There are many reasons for this large range of possible climate effects, e.g. the complexity of the involved processes and the necessity for assumptions and parameterizations to represent sub-grid processes at the large-scale global model resolution. Part of the uncertainties in the INP–cirrus effect is related to the assumptions for the still poorly understood ice-nucleating properties of INPs. These are the critical saturation ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at which the INPs can initiate freezing and the active fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the aerosol particle population that can act as INPs. Typically, mineral dust and soot particles have been considered in global models for ice nucleation in the cirrus regime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.12"/>. However, our knowledge on the global INP population is still uncertain, as several recent studies reported a strong ice-nucleating potential of INP species that previously had not been considered for cirrus ice nucleation, e.g. glassy organic particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.13"/>, and crystalline ammonium sulfate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.14"/>.  Furthermore, it has been shown that the dynamic forcing, induced by the vertical velocities of the air parcels during the freezing process, is crucial for the competition between heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.15"/>. Despite the importance of subgrid-scale variabilities of updraught speeds, global models are not able to resolve these due to their coarse resolution and need to adopt simplified representations, which can introduce additional uncertainties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.16"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e346">We analyse different aspects of INP-induced cirrus modifications in a global aerosol–climate model with the goal of exploring the large uncertainties in the understanding of the aerosol–cirrus effect. We employ  the atmospheric chemistry general circulation model EMAC (ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry model; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.17"/>) including the MESSy (Modular Earth Submodel System) aerosol microphysics submodel MADE3 (Modal Aerosol Dynamics model for Europe, adapted for global applications, third generation; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.18"/>). The MADE3 aerosol is coupled to (cirrus) clouds via a two-moment cloud scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.19"/> as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.20"/>. In addition to mineral dust and soot, glassy organics and crystalline ammonium sulfate particles are represented as INPs in the model as described in detail by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.21"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e365">We investigate the impact of different subsets of the INP population, e.g. the effect of anthropogenic INPs. Also, the impact of ammonium sulfate INPs is evaluated, as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.22"/> recently reported a potentially large impact of this INP type. We further analyse the influences of different assumptions for the ice-nucleating properties of the INPs. In<?pagebreak page3219?> order to explore the sensitivity of INP–cirrus effects to the model dynamics, we perform mechanistic studies by varying the representation of vertical velocities in the model. We discuss possible sources of uncertainties in the simulated INP effects, e.g. due to the use of model nudging, dependencies on the applied model resolution, and model assumptions regarding the parameterization of INP–cirrus interactions. Additionally, we analyse the effect of highly efficient INPs, which have been proposed to engineer climate and reduce global warming by cirrus cloud seeding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.23"/>. By designing the simulation experiments for this analysis according to the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.24"/>, we improve the comparability and aim to explore the robustness of the resulting quantifications of the INP–cirrus effects presented here by comparing with a similar model study.</p>
      <p id="d1e377">This paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we provide an overview on the modelling framework EMAC, including the aerosol submodel MADE3 and its coupling to (cirrus) clouds. Results on the effect of INPs on cirrus clouds and radiation are presented in Sect. 3, regarding the impact of the assumed ice-nucleating properties of INPs, the effect of different INP species, the role of the representation of vertical velocities in the model, and the impact of highly efficient INPs proposed for cirrus cloud seeding. The work presented in this paper is in part based on the PhD thesis by Christof G. Beer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.25"/>, and some of the text therein is similar.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e391">The EMAC model is a global numerical chemistry and climate simulation system and includes various submodels that describe tropospheric and middle-atmosphere processes. It uses the second version of MESSy to connect multi-institutional computer codes. The core atmospheric model is the ECHAM5 (fifth-generation European Centre Hamburg) general circulation model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.26"/>. In this work we apply EMAC (ECHAM5 version 5.3.02, MESSy version 2.54) in the T42L41 configuration with spherical truncation of T42 (corresponding to a horizontal resolution of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude and longitude) and 41 non-equidistant vertical layers from the surface to 10 hPa. The simulated time period covers the years 2000 to 2010, while the year 2000 is used as a spin-up and excluded from the evaluation. Most simulations presented here are performed in nudged mode; i.e. model meteorology (temperature, winds and logarithm of the surface pressure) is relaxed towards ECMWF reanalyses (ERA-Interim; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="author.27"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="year.28"/>) for the simulated time period. The original reanalysis data with a spectral horizontal resolution of T255 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a vertical resolution of 60 levels from the ground up to 0.1 hPa have been re-gridded to the model resolution used in this study. The nudging data have a temporal resolution of 6 h. Additional sensitivity experiments are performed in free-running mode to analyse the effect of nudging on the results also covering the time period 2001–2010, using prescribed long-term means (2001–2010) of sea surface temperature and sea ice concentration from the Met Office Hadley Centre dataset (HadISST; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="author.29"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="year.30"/>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e445">Freezing properties of ice-nucleating particles in the cirrus regime assumed in this study, i.e. critical supersaturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and activated fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the freezing onset. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the supersaturation with respect to ice. As an alternative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values representative of the freezing onset, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the centre of the activation spectrum are assumed for a sensitivity experiment, representing the midpoint between the onset and the homogeneous freezing threshold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Freezing mode</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at onset <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at central <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Reference</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">DU deposition</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.31"/>
                  </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AmSu</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.25</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.001</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.32"/>
                </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">glPOM</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.001</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.33"/>
                </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DU immersion</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.35</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.065</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.34"/>
                </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.001</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.006</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.35"/>
                </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e817">The aerosol microphysics submodel MADE3 simulates different aerosol species in nine log-normal modes that represent different particle sizes and mixing states. Each of the MADE3 Aitken-, accumulation-, and coarse-mode size ranges includes three modes for different particle-mixing states: particles fully composed of water-soluble components, particles mainly composed of insoluble material (i.e. insoluble particles with only very thin coatings of soluble material), and mixed particles (i.e. soluble material with inclusions of insoluble particles). A detailed description of MADE3 and its application and evaluation as part of EMAC is presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx33" id="text.36"/>. The optical properties of aerosols and clouds are calculated in the EMAC submodels AEROPT and CLOUDOPT <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.37"/>, respectively, according to input from OPAC (optical properties for aerosols and clouds; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="author.38"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="year.39"/>). The OPAC package uses basic optical properties from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.40"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e836">The EMAC–MADE3 set-up applied here is in large part based on the set-up described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.41"/>. We use the recent CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, phase 6) emission inventory for anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of aerosols and aerosol precursor species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.42"/> for the year 2014. Prescribed emission data are provided in a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The re-gridding to the actual model grid is performed during the model simulation using the algorithm NCREGRID <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.43"/>. Since our study focuses on the radiative effects of aerosols on (cirrus) clouds, the concentrations of radiatively active gases other than water vapour (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and chlorofluorocarbons) are prescribed by means of global distributions. In order to simulate the effect of anthropogenic emissions on the INP–cirrus effects, a pre-industrial simulation is performed considering year 1750 emissions for anthropogenic and biomass-burning sources, instead of the 2014 (present-day) ones. Mineral dust emissions are calculated according to the online emission scheme of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.44"/>, as described and evaluated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.45"/>. In order to isolate the effect of anthropogenic emissions, mineral dust emissions and all other natural emissions in the model (i.e. biogenic emissions, volcanic emissions, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from lightning, emissions of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) precursors, dimethyl sulfide (DMS) emissions, and wind-driven sea spray emissions) are kept constant at their present-day value in all simulations performed here.</p>
      <p id="d1e926">In this study, EMAC–MADE3 is employed in a coupled configuration, which includes a two-moment cloud microphysical scheme based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.46"/>, employing<?pagebreak page3220?> a parameterization for aerosol-driven ice formation in cirrus clouds following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.47"/>. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.48"/> scheme considers the competition between various ice formation mechanisms for the available supersaturated water vapour, i.e. homogeneous freezing of solution droplets, deposition and immersion nucleation induced by INPs, and the growth of pre-existing ice crystals. By way of simplification the scheme does not represent the whole freezing spectrum (from the freezing onset to the homogeneous freezing threshold) but considers one singular point in the spectrum, e.g. corresponding to the freezing onset. In each of the heterogeneous freezing modes the ice-nucleating properties of the INPs are represented by two parameters, namely the active fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of ice-nucleating particles, which actually lead to the formation of ice crystals, and the critical supersaturation ratio with respect to ice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), at which the freezing process is initiated. In addition to choosing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> representative of the freezing onset, we also consider a larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value representing the midpoint between the freezing onset and the homogeneous freezing threshold. With this sensitivity experiment we aim to explore the range of possible forcings due to uncertainties in the freezing properties of INPs also accounting for increasing activated fractions during the freezing process, which might be more representative for the total number of activated particles. We discuss possible sources of uncertainties influencing the simulated results due to the applied cirrus cloud parameterization in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>. The model set-up has been extensively tuned and evaluated with respect to various cloud and radiation variables by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.49"/> with further model improvements described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.50"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e991">The aerosol-driven ice formation scheme includes additional model developments to represent crystalline ammonium sulfate (AmSu) and glassy organic particles (glPOM), in addition to mineral dust (DU) and soot (BC), as ice-nucleating particles. The model is able to distinguish between aviation soot and soot from other sources <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.51"/>; however, we choose the same freezing properties for these two soot classes in this study due to the uncertain freezing properties of aviation BC. The model improvements regarding glassy organics and crystalline ammonium sulfate were described in detail by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.52"/> and are briefly summarized here. Importantly, the particle phase state is tracked for glassy organics and crystalline ammonium sulfate, as only the respective glassy or crystalline phase facilitates ice nucleation. Natural SOA precursor emissions (e.g. isoprene, monoterpenes, and other volatile organic compounds) according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.53"/> are considered for the glassy organics tracer in the model. We use a simplified representation for the glass-transition temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, depending on the relative humidity (RH). For temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> liquid SOA particles are transformed into a semi-solid, glassy state. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SOA proxy citric acid is calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.54"/>. For crystalline ammonium sulfate, a dedicated phase transition formulation via a hysteresis process depending on the relative humidity history is considered in the model. Efflorescence of aqueous ammonium sulfate particles occurs at a lower relative humidity than the deliquescence of ammonium sulfate crystals. The number concentrations of potential INPs are calculated for the different ice formation modes in the mixed-phase and the cirrus regime according to the procedure described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.55"/> and adapted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.56"/> considering the additional INP types ammonium sulfate and glassy organics. Different mixing states of particles are taken into account for the simulated ice-nucleation processes. For example, the model distinguishes between immersion freezing of mixed mineral dust particles and deposition freezing of insoluble mineral dust. The freezing properties, i.e. values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the different INP species are assumed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.57"/> and are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1087">Summary of the global model simulations performed in this study. Each experiment considers the difference between two simulations, i.e. one with heterogeneous freezing on INPs and one without, i.e. only homogeneous freezing. The homogeneous freezing reference cases are marked in bold. An exception includes the simulations that consider AmSu (glPOM) in addition to DU and BC (simulations F-CEN-DBA, F-CEN-DBG; see below), which consider the simulation with DU and BC as the reference case (simulation F-CEN-DB). The freezing properties (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of INPs are also summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Every simulation includes an extra spin-up year which is not considered for the analysis. The nudged simulations use meteorological reanalysis data for the period 2001–2010. The pre-industrial simulation considers year 1750 emissions for anthropogenic and biomass burning sources, instead of the 2014 (present-day) ones. All simulations cover a 10-year period (2001–2010).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">INP species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Vertical velocity [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Dynamics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-ONS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">onset</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-DB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-DBA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-DBG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>HOM</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>none (only hom. freezing)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>online</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>nudged</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>present-day</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-PI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">pre-industrial</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>HOM-PI</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>none (only hom. freezing)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>online</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>nudged</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>pre-industrial</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-V1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-V5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-V10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-V20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-V50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>HOM-V</bold><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>none (only hom. freezing)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>nudged</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>present-day</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEED-0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seed INPs, 0.5 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEED-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seed INPs, 1.0 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEED-10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seed INPs, 10 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SEED-100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seed INPs, 100 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">online</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nudged</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>HOM</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>none (only hom. freezing)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>online</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>nudged</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>present-day</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-CEN-V20-F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DU, BC, AmSu, glPOM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">central</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">free</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">present-day</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>HOM-F</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>none (only hom. freezing)</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>–</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>20</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>free</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>present-day</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1114"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Baseline simulations with only homogeneous freezing have been performed for each vertical velocity.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1916">In a set of sensitivity experiments we analyse the influence of variations in the updraught velocities on the INP–cirrus effects. In the reference case vertical velocities are parameterized in the model to account for the subgrid-scale variability of updraught velocities, which cannot be resolved with the coarse model resolution. As described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.58"/>, the total updraught speed is represented as the sum of the<?pagebreak page3221?> large-scale vertical velocity, a turbulent component which is proportional to the square root of the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="author.59"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="year.60"/>), and an additional term accounting for orographic gravity waves calculated by the orographic gravity wave submodel (OROGW) in EMAC, based on the parameterization by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.61"/>. The resulting global distribution of simulated vertical velocities (including also the single components) can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.62"/>. To further investigate these dynamic influences on the INP–cirrus effects, we also consider an idealized representation of the vertical velocity. We prescribe constant values of the vertical velocity across the whole globe in the range from 1 to 50 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to explore the full range of updraught speeds typically occurring in the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.63"/>. This also enables the investigation of INP effects in regimes not covered by the updraught parameterization considering TKE and orographic gravity waves mentioned above. An overview of the different simulation experiments presented here is provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1955">Global distribution of the simulated number concentrations of different INPs per litre (L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) inside cirrus clouds (selecting only grid boxes with cirrus occurrence) considering the multi-year average over the simulation period (2001–2010) and over all vertical levels; similar to Fig. 5 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.64"/> but for the T42L41 model resolution applied here. Shown are mineral dust (DU; <bold>a</bold>), black carbon (BC; <bold>b</bold>), black carbon from aviation (BCair; <bold>c</bold>), ammonium sulfate (AmSu; <bold>d</bold>), glassy organics (glPOM; <bold>d</bold>), and total INP concentrations <bold>(f)</bold>. Cirrus conditions are selected according to thresholds for simulated ambient temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K) and ice water content (IWC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in every grid box using the 11 h output frequency. The number concentrations of potential INPs are weighted with ice-active fractions at ice supersaturations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from laboratory measurements (see Table 1 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="altparen.65"/>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Model resolution dependencies</title>
      <p id="d1e2056">As described in the previous section, the simulations presented in this study have been performed using the T42L41 model resolution, representing a horizontal resolution of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude and longitude and 41 vertical layers. This model resolution is different from the one applied in previous studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx9" id="text.66"/>, i.e. T63L31 (corresponding to a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 31 vertical layers). For the present study focusing on the climate impact of INPs, we rely on the extensive model tuning of cloud and radiation properties by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx70" id="text.67"/>, applying the T42L41 resolution. Additionally, performing the large number of simulations presented here would not be feasible applying the T63L31 model set-up, which would require considerably more computational resources due to the increased horizontal model resolution. However, the lower horizontal resolution used in this study also has some drawbacks, which are discussed in the following. As described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.68"/>, a lower horizontal model resolution<?pagebreak page3222?> can introduce a positive bias for aerosol number concentrations compared to observations, which are most pronounced in the upper troposphere. In Fig. S1 in the Supplement, we present a comparison of aerosol number concentrations for the different model resolutions, which complements Fig. 5 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.69"/> with the results for the T42L41 resolution applied in the present study. Aerosol number concentrations above 400 hPa are about a factor of 2 to 3 larger in the T42L41 resolution compared to T63L31. As discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.70"/>, this could be related to overestimated upward transport, possibly in convective plumes, or underestimation of aerosol scavenging through an efficiency of the wet deposition processes that is too low in the model.</p>
      <p id="d1e2107">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows the global distributions of the simulated INP number concentrations as shown in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="author.71"/> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="year.72"/>; Fig. 5) but for the T42L41 model resolution. While the main findings and conclusions discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.73"/> still hold for the decreased (increased) horizontal (vertical) model resolution, the simulated INP number concentrations are about a factor of 2 larger compared to the INP concentrations presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.74"/> for the T63L31 model resolution. The effect of a lower horizontal model resolution has to be considered for the interpretation of the resulting climate forcings due to INPs as presented here and would likely result in larger INP effects due to the increased concentration of INPs. Notably, the model resolution can also influence cloud formation in the model, e.g. via changes in the simulated vertical velocity, which acts as a driver for the supersaturation, and hence the ice-nucleation processes in the model can be influenced by the applied model resolution. In<?pagebreak page3223?> general, the differences in cloud frequency and vertical velocities between the T42L41 and T63L31 model resolutions are smaller compared to the differences in INP numbers, i.e. mostly below 50 % in the cirrus regime (data not shown). Nonetheless, the applied model resolution can influence the simulated INP–cirrus effects, and this impact should be the focus of future studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Simulated INP–cirrus effects</title>
      <p id="d1e2139">The results presented here describe the effect of INPs on cirrus clouds and radiation, calculated as the difference between simulations with and without heterogeneous freezing induced by INPs. These differences are often small and sparsely distributed, which makes them difficult to quantify, due to the low magnitude of the effect with respect to the internal model variability. Therefore, the analysis is performed considering differences of aggregated quantities at the global and regional level and the typical cirrus altitudes (above 400 hPa) to facilitate the interpretation of the results. However, one has to keep in mind that these aggregated results can represent a superposition of different local regimes and effects. The radiative forcings reported here explicitly consider the impact of cloud adjustments, as we are employing an aerosol–cloud coupled model. The RF values presented in the following can therefore be regarded as approximations of effective radiative forcings (ERFs), although the use of model nudging may tend to suppress some feedbacks (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>). Therefore, we use the term ERF in the following.</p>
      <p id="d1e2144">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, the effect of all INPs (i.e. DU, BC, BCair, AmSu, and glPOM) on different cloud and radiation variables is shown. Results for top-of-the-atmosphere radiative forcings (ERF; all-sky, cloudy-sky, longwave, and shortwave) are represented as absolute differences in units of mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a–e), while relative differences (in %) are shown for the other variables (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>f–i), i.e. ice crystal number concentration (ICNC), homogeneous freezing fraction, total water (as the sum of water vapour and ice water), and cloud occurrence frequency. For each quantity the global and regional zonal (Southern Hemisphere extratropics, tropics, Northern Hemisphere extratropics; see the caption of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> for details) differences are shown. The freezing properties of INPs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are representative of the freezing onset (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). The statistical confidence of the calculated anomalies is assessed employing a paired-sample Student’s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, with the null hypothesis that the annual mean values of a given quantity (e.g. the radiative forcing) are identical in the two simulations (with and without heterogeneous freezing). The response of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test is represented in terms of confidence levels (in %), i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value. The results are regarded as statistically significant for confidence levels larger than 95 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2252">In general, cirrus clouds have a pronounced longwave warming effect (absorption of terrestrial radiation), which together with the smaller shortwave cooling (reflection of solar radiation) results in a net warming of the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.75"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This global warming effect is strongly enhanced during night-time due to the missing shortwave cooling effect. The presence of INPs typically results in a thinning of cirrus clouds and in turn a reduced cirrus warming, i.e. a cooling effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.76"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2265">Our model results indeed show a negative radiative forcing due to heterogeneous freezing on INPs, i.e. a global cooling of the climate system with a ERF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, considering the confidence interval for the 95 % confidence level (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a). This cooling effect is largest in the extratropics, i.e. ERF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Southern Hemisphere and Northern Hemisphere, respectively. The total ERF is the sum of the shortwave and longwave forcings (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b, c), and the cooling effect of INPs is mostly related to a negative longwave ERF. This means that the INPs act to decrease the longwave warming of the cirrus clouds, resulting in a longwave cooling effect, while the opposite is true in the shortwave (albeit with lower statistical significance). Ice crystal numbers, homogeneous freezing fraction, and total water mass are reduced with respect to the pure homogeneous freezing case (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>f–h), whereas the occurrence frequency of clouds is mostly enhanced (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>i). This analysis is based on global or zonal averages (tropics, extratropics). However, large regional variations can occur due to the different geographical distribution of INPs and cirrus clouds, as shown in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.77"/>. Additionally, large spatial variations in the vertical velocity simulated by the model can lead to regional differences in the INP–cirrus effects. The regional variations in the simulated INP–cirrus effects are shown in Fig. S2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2349">Total INP–cirrus effect considering all INPs calculated from the difference between a simulation including these INPs and a simulation with only homogeneous freezing, considering the multi-year average over the simulated period (2001–2010). Freezing properties of INPs are assumed according to freezing onset values for the activated fractions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Global and latitude-specific regional differences are shown for <bold>(a)</bold> total all-sky, <bold>(b)</bold> all-sky shortwave, <bold>(c)</bold> all-sky longwave, <bold>(d)</bold> clear-sky shortwave, and <bold>(e)</bold> clear-sky longwave top-of-the-atmosphere ERFs in units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mW</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(f)</bold>–<bold>(i)</bold> Relative changes in the all-sky ICNC, fraction of homogeneously formed ice crystals, total water (as the sum of water vapour and ice water), and cloud occurrence frequency, all spatially averaged above the 400 hPa level and over cloudy and cloud-free grid boxes. Global and latitude-specific regional values are shown for the Southern Hemisphere extratropics (90–30° S), tropics (30° S–30° N), and Northern Hemisphere extratropics (30–90° N). Confidence levels (in %) with respect to the model inter-annual variability are calculated according to a two-tailed Student’s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test and are shown for each bar. Significant and non-significant results are represented by filled and hatched bars, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2417">In theory, the presence of INPs results in a competition between heterogeneous freezing (at relatively low ice supersaturation) and homogeneous freezing (at higher supersaturation). This typically leads to a reduction in ice crystal numbers and the formation of larger ice crystals compared to homogeneous freezing, as shown, for example, in process-model studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.78"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.79"/>. This reduction of ice crystal numbers is also visible in the global simulations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>f). The decrease of total water (water vapour and ice) mass indicates an increased sedimentation of the larger crystals resulting in a thinning of cirrus clouds, as also shown in other global modelling studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.80"/>. On the other hand, the presence of INPs can also increase the occurrence frequency of cirrus clouds, as heterogeneous freezing occurs earlier than homogeneous freezing (at lower critical supersaturations with respect to ice), resulting in an increased cloud occurrence (Fig <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>i). Differences between tropics and extratropics can be explained by the geographical distribution of<?pagebreak page3224?> the simulated effects (Fig. S2). In the extratropics, regions of positive and negative changes in total water (Fig. S2h) lead to small and non-significant effects in these regions. For the cloud frequency (Fig. S2i), positive and negative changes cancel each other in the tropics, resulting in the largest effects in the extratropics, where the increase in cloud frequency is most pronounced. The vanishing ERF in the tropics may also be due to the strong influence of convection in that region, resulting in enhanced updraughts that are more favourable for homogeneous freezing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.81"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2437">The results presented here indicate a thinning of cirrus clouds in the presence of INPs due to fewer ice crystals and stronger sedimentation, which in turn leads to a cooling effect. The regions of strong longwave cooling also coincide with regional reductions in cloud occurrence (see Fig. S1). On the other hand, this cooling is weakened by an increase in cloud frequency in other regions, possibly due to more frequent cloud formation or increased cloud lifetimes in the presence of INPs, as a result of the INPs initiating ice formation earlier, i.e. at lower critical supersaturations, compared to homogeneous freezing. Both pathways, i.e. a decrease or an increase in cirrus cloud occurrence due to INPs, have been reported in previous modelling studies depending on the ambient atmospheric conditions and the availability and ice-nucleating properties of INPs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.82"/>.<?pagebreak page3225?> Notably, this contributes to the challenge in quantifying the radiative impacts, due to the high variability of the different effects. On the global scale, the combination of the effects mentioned above results in a net negative ERF due to heterogeneous freezing (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a). Regional differences are possibly related to variations in INP concentrations as described and presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.83"/>. Additionally, regional variations in the vertical updraughts and cooling rates, as shown in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.84"/>, impact the described results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2453">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> but showing the total INP–cirrus effect considering two values for the activated fraction of INPs, i.e. freezing onset values (pink bars, as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) and larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the centre of the freezing spectrum (blue bars, see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Global and latitude-specific regional differences are shown for <bold>(a)</bold> total all-sky top-of-the-atmosphere ERF in units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mW</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and relative changes in <bold>(b)</bold> all-sky ICNC, <bold>(c)</bold> total water, and <bold>(d)</bold> cloud occurrence frequency, spatially averaged above the 400 hPa level and considering multi-year averages over the simulated period (2001–2010).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>Sensitivity to freezing properties of INPs</title>
      <p id="d1e2516">In order to explore the uncertainties related to the range of freezing properties (i.e. prescribed values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ice nucleation scheme), two cases are analysed (see also Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>): (i) freezing properties representative of freezing onset conditions (as in the previous section), i.e. low values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and (ii) freezing properties in the centre of the freezing spectrum, i.e. larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (midpoint between freezing onset and homogeneous freezing threshold), which might be more representative of the total number of activated particles. An enhancement of the freezing properties using larger values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in similar features as for freezing-onset conditions, albeit with larger effects and higher statistical confidence, e.g. global ERF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Typically, the enhanced freezing efficiency of INPs leads to about a factor of 2 larger INP–cirrus effects, e.g. regarding the global ERF (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a), or the change in ICNC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b). In addition to the variables shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, the full set of variables from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> is shown in Fig. S3. Also, the geographical distributions for the increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> case are shown in Fig. S4.</p>
      <p id="d1e2625">In general, the negative sign of the simulated global forcing, i.e. a global cooling, as a result of cloud modifications due to heterogeneous freezing is in line with previous global model studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.85"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. However, the simulated global radiative forcings of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (considering the two different assumptions for the INP freezing properties) are smaller compared to several other studies that often simulate radiative effects of the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.86"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. On the other hand, some other studies also simulate small, mostly non-significant INP–cirrus effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.87"/>. However, a direct comparison of different model results is difficult due to model differences in the representation of cirrus clouds, INPs, and freezing mechanisms. For example, often different types of INPs (with different freezing properties) were assumed and different effects were analysed.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><title>Impacts of different INP species</title>
      <p id="d1e2706">In the following, INP–cirrus effects considering different subsets of INP types are analysed. We choose the case with larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for this analysis (blue bars in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>), as the larger effects and increased statistical significance facilitates the comparisons. The effect of mineral dust and soot INPs is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. The trends are similar to the case where all INP types can initiate freezing, but the magnitude of the effects are often smaller. For example, the radiative effect is reduced by a factor of about 2, i.e. a global ERF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the effect of all INPs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2779">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> but showing the INP–cirrus effect induced by mineral dust and soot INPs only, considering the central <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value, calculated from the difference between a simulation including these INPs and a simulation with only homogeneous freezing. Global and latitude-specific regional differences are shown for <bold>(a)</bold> total all-sky, <bold>(b)</bold> all-sky shortwave, <bold>(c)</bold> all-sky longwave, <bold>(d)</bold> clear-sky shortwave, and <bold>(e)</bold> clear-sky longwave top-of-the-atmosphere ERFs. <bold>(f)</bold>–<bold>(i)</bold> Relative changes in the all-sky ICNC, fraction of homogeneously formed ice crystals, total water (as the sum of water vapour and ice water), and cloud occurrence frequency, all spatially averaged above the 400 hPa level, considering multi-year averages over the simulated period (2001–2010).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2823">The INP–cirrus effect due to including ammonium sulfate in addition to mineral dust and soot INPs results in an additional global ERF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). This is calculated as the difference between a simulation including AmSu, DU and BC INPs, and a simulation including only heterogeneous freezing on DU and BC. The size of the ammonium sulfate effect corresponds almost to the size of the global effect of mineral dust and soot. The large impact of ammonium sulfate is related to the large simulated INP concentrations in the cirrus regime as shown in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.88"/>. Notably, the ammonium sulfate radiative effect even exceeds that of mineral dust and soot in the Northern Hemisphere, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a) compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a), resulting from the large number concentrations of ammonium sulfate INPs in that region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.89"/>. Notably, the ammonium sulfate effect results in a reduced cloud frequency in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) compared to an increase for the case of mineral dust and soot (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). This indicates that the effect of more frequent cirrus formation due to earlier ice nucleation in the presence of INPs is already exhausted by the heterogeneous freezing on mineral dust and soot INPs. The addition of ammonium sulfate INPs further suppresses homogeneous freezing and results in increased sedimentation of ice crystals and lower cirrus occurrence frequencies. In contrast to ammonium sulfate, the effect of glassy organic INPs is not significant for most of the considered variables and latitude regions (see Fig. S5). This is in line with the low concentrations of simulated glassy organic INPs in cirrus clouds described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.90"/>. A further sensitivity study with an increased number of glassy organic INPs (by choosing a different glassy SOA proxy for calculating the glass transition temperature as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="author.91"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="year.92"/>) also results in no significant impacts of glassy organic INPs (data not shown).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2934">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> but showing the INP–cirrus effect induced by crystalline ammonium sulfate INPs, calculated from the difference between a simulation including AmSu, DU and BC INPs, and a simulation including only heterogeneous freezing on DU and BC. Note the different reference case with respect to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. Global and latitude-specific regional differences are shown for <bold>(a)</bold> total all-sky, <bold>(b)</bold> all-sky shortwave, <bold>(c)</bold> all-sky longwave, <bold>(d)</bold> clear-sky shortwave, and <bold>(e)</bold> clear-sky longwave top-of-the-atmosphere ERFs. <bold>(f)</bold>–<bold>(i)</bold> Relative changes in the all-sky ICNC, fraction of homogeneously formed ice crystals, total water (as the sum of water vapour and ice water), and cloud occurrence frequency, all spatially averaged above the 400 hPa level, considering multi-year averages over the simulated period (2001–2010).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>4.1.3</label><title>Effect of anthropogenic INPs</title>
      <p id="d1e2977">In this section, the potential influences of anthropogenic INPs on cirrus clouds and climate are analysed. Anthropogenic activities, e.g. the combustion of (sulfur-containing) fossil fuels and the use of ammoniacal fertilizers, mainly affect the atmospheric concentrations of soot, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consequently influencing the concentrations of soot and ammonium sulfate INPs. Here we compare two set-ups, i.e. the reference case with present-day (2014) emissions and a set-up with pre-industrial (1750) emissions for anthropogenic and biomass-burning sources. Other emissions from natural sources are left unchanged between the two set-ups to isolate the anthropogenic effect. As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, radiatively active gases as well as the meteorology are also unchanged from present-day levels so that the resulting radiative forcings are solely due to changes in the concentrations of aerosols and the resulting cloud modifications. Using prescribed pre-industrial instead of present-day greenhouse gas concentrations may lead to additional changes in the INP effects, due to the climate forcing by anthropogenic greenhouse gases masking the forcing from the INP–cloud interactions. The INP–cirrus effects are shown for present-day and pre-industrial aerosol conditions in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. Additionally, the geographic distributions for the pre-industrial case are depicted in Fig. S6. In general, the INP effect due to anthropogenic emissions results in lower ice crystal numbers and cloud occurrences, and a larger reduction of homogeneously formed ice crystals, compared to the pre-industrial times. This reduces the warming effect due to cirrus clouds and consequently results in a larger, i.e. more negative, radiative forcing in the present-day case. The global ERF of anthropogenic INPs is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (confidence level of 92 %), calculated from the difference in the INP–cirrus effect between present-day (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and pre-industrial conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a). Considering the current Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) best estimate of the total effective radiative forcing due to aerosol–cloud interactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.93"/>, the anthropogenic INP–cirrus effect simulated here (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is very small. In the Northern Hemisphere, the present-day ERF is about twice as large as the pre-industrial value (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a), as a result of the strong anthropogenic emissions in this region. Additionally, the geographic distributions of cloud frequency changes between present-day (Fig. S3i) and pre-industrial (Fig. S5i) show that the regions with reduced cloud frequency are more pronounced in the present-day case (especially in the Northern Hemisphere), while the regions with increased cloud frequency remain mostly unchanged with respect to<?pagebreak page3227?> pre-industrial times. Again, this suggests that the effect of increased cloud occurrence in the presence of INPs is already exhausted by natural INPs. The additional anthropogenic INPs further decrease the cloud frequency in specific regions (see Figs. S4i and S6i). Consequently, the cooling effect due to anthropogenic INPs is more pronounced and shows a larger statistical significance in the Northern Hemisphere, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3174">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> but showing the total INP–cirrus effects for present-day (2014) and for pre-industrial (1750) emission conditions. The pre-industrial set-up considers emissions for anthropogenic and biomass-burning sources representative of the year 1750. All panels show absolute differences with respect to the purely homogeneous freezing case in the two emission set-ups. Global and latitude-specific regional differences are shown for <bold>(a)</bold> total all-sky, <bold>(b)</bold> all-sky shortwave, <bold>(c)</bold> all-sky longwave, <bold>(d)</bold> clear-sky shortwave, and <bold>(e)</bold> clear-sky longwave top-of-the-atmosphere ERFs. <bold>(f)</bold>–<bold>(i)</bold> Changes in the all-sky ICNC, fraction of homogeneously formed ice crystals, total water (as the sum of water vapour and ice water), and cloud occurrence frequency, all spatially averaged above the 400 hPa level, considering multi-year averages over the simulated period (2001–2010).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Sensitivity of the INP–cirrus effect to the model representation of the vertical velocity</title>
      <p id="d1e3216">In the following we discuss the particular role of the updraught speed of air parcels, which control their adiabatic cooling rate, as the temperature decreases during the lifting process. Various studies show that this dynamic forcing is crucial for the competition between heterogeneous and homogeneous freezing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.94"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3224">To analyse the sensitivity of INP-induced cirrus modifications to the vertical velocities in the model, a simplified representation for the updraught speed is employed here, as also described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.95"/>, i.e. using a prescribed constant vertical velocity in the cirrus formation process across the whole globe in the range of 1 to 50 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In comparison, the simulations analysed in the previous sections employed a parameterization for the simulated updraught speeds, including large-scale and subgrid variability (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> and Fig. S7 showing the global distribution of large scale and subgrid vertical velocities). However, treating the vertical velocity in a simplified way (i.e. prescribing a global value) has the advantage that also regions on the globe are taken into account, where no effects would occur<?pagebreak page3228?> in the reference case with parameterized vertical velocities. This is important as the updraught parameterization is subject to uncertainties. For example, some processes influencing the subgrid variations of updraught speed may be missing or incorrectly represented (e.g. possible fluctuations due to small-scale, non-orographic gravity waves). Furthermore, the correct representation of vertical velocity fluctuations driven by gravity waves is highly important, as recent studies observed a strong impact of gravity wave temperature perturbations on cirrus cloud occurrence and cirrus properties in the tropical tropopause layer (TTL) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.96"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3249">Multi-year global averages (years 2001–2010) of changes in <bold>(a)</bold> total all-sky, <bold>(b)</bold> all-sky shortwave, <bold>(c)</bold> all-sky longwave, <bold>(d)</bold> clear-sky shortwave, <bold>(e)</bold> clear-sky longwave top-of-the-atmosphere ERFs, relative changes averaged above the 400 hPa level for <bold>(f)</bold> all-sky ICNC, <bold>(g)</bold> the fraction of homogeneously formed ice crystals, <bold>(h)</bold> total water (as the sum of water vapour and ice water), and <bold>(i)</bold> cloud occurrence frequency due to the total INP–cirrus effect, considering the difference with respect to the purely homogeneous freezing case, for different values of the vertical velocity, all spatially averaged above the 400 hPa level and over cloudy and cloud-free grid boxes. Confidence levels (in %) are shown for each bar. Significant and non-significant results are represented by filled and hatched bars, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3229?><p id="d1e3287">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows the sensitivity of the effect of all INPs (compared to pure homogeneous freezing, assuming a central <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value) to the variation of the prescribed global vertical velocity. Different values of 1, 5, 10, 20, and 50 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are analysed with respect to changes in the radiative forcing and cirrus properties. For small vertical velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 10 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) the global ERF is rather small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, about 0, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a). This corresponds to small relative changes in, for example, ice crystal numbers, total water, and cloud occurrences (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f, h, i). When increasing the vertical velocity to 20 and 50 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the ERF increases, i.e. becomes more negative, to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">213</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">340</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a). Homogeneous freezing is nearly completely inhibited for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>g), while the homogeneous freezing fraction increases for larger updraughts. Interestingly, the maximal INP–cirrus effect on ICNC and cloud frequency is simulated for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreases again at 50 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, as homogeneous freezing becomes more effective and rapidly consumes the available supersaturated water vapour, as also modelled by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.97"/>. However, this behaviour is not visible in the global ERF, which shows the largest values at 50 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Comparing the results to the reference case with parameterized vertical velocities, the forcings at smaller prescribed updraught speeds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) show similar magnitudes as the reference (simulation F-CEN, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). This indicates that INP–cirrus effects in the reference case are likely controlled by smaller vertical velocities, supporting the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.98"/> for aviation soot–INP effects.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3535">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> but showing zonal averages of changes in <bold>(a)</bold> total all-sky, <bold>(b)</bold> all-sky shortwave, <bold>(c)</bold> all-sky longwave, <bold>(d)</bold> clear-sky shortwave, <bold>(e)</bold> clear-sky longwave top-of-the-atmosphere ERFs, and relative changes averaged above the 400 hPa level for <bold>(f)</bold> all-sky ICNC, <bold>(g)</bold> the fraction of homogeneously formed ice crystals, <bold>(h)</bold> total water (as the sum of water vapour and ice water), and <bold>(i)</bold> cloud occurrence frequency, considering multi-year averages over the simulated period (2001–2010). Non-significant values are shaded in grey.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3574">In addition to the global mean values, zonal profiles of the simulated effects are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. The results reveal that the simulated radiative forcings are strongest in the extratropics, especially in the Northern Hemisphere. Additionally, the change of sign in the longwave clear-sky ERF from 1 to 5 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is associated with an increase in total water mainly in the extratropics (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>e, h).</p>
      <p id="d1e3593">In general, the increase in the INP–cirrus effect with increasing vertical velocity is in line with results from a process-model study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.99"/>. In that study, the authors also showed that for updraught speeds exceeding a certain threshold, homogeneous freezing is gaining increasing importance, leading to a reduction of the effect of heterogeneous INPs on the ICNC, which is in line with the simulated global effects presented here. Regional differences in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> (e.g. smaller effects on ICNC and cloud frequency in the tropics) are possibly related to the regional variation in INP number concentrations. The impact of changes in the vertical velocity as presented here is larger compared to a similar study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.100"/>, where increased forcings<?pagebreak page3230?> of up to a factor of 2 were reported. This is a result of the different investigated effect. While <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.101"/> analysed the impact of aviation soot INPs (by comparing with a reference case without aviation soot ice nucleation), the present study investigates the effect of all INPs with respect to the case of purely homogeneous freezing.</p>
      <p id="d1e3607">In an additional set of sensitivity experiments we analysed the impact of scaling the parameterized vertical velocity by factors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 5 (See Fig. S8). Those results show a similar behaviour as for the case of prescribed constant updraught speeds, i.e. more negative ERF and a stronger reduction in ICNC and total water with increasing vertical velocities, albeit showing smaller effects than in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> (e.g. a global ERF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the strongest increase in the vertical velocity). In this study, subgrid variations of the vertical velocity are represented by the turbulent component of the kinetic energy extended by an orographic gravity wave term <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.102"/>. As explained above, this representation is also subject to uncertainties as certain components of small-scale fluctuations, e.g. non-orographic subgrid-scale gravity waves, are not taken into account. In general, parameterizations of subgrid cooling rate variations suffer from the lack of related observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.103"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. The wide range of simulated radiative effects due to small changes in the updraught speeds shown in this study highlights the importance for future developments in updraught parameterizations in global models.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3231?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Impact of model nudging</title>
      <p id="d1e3673">So far, the results presented above have referred to model simulations performed in nudged mode, i.e. relaxing model winds, temperature, and surface pressure towards ECMWF reanalyses (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>). However, this may affect the INP-induced cirrus cloud and radiation modifications described in the previous sections. Nudging could possibly suppress important feedback mechanisms that would occur in the free-running mode where the meteorology is not influenced by predefined values. However, simulating in nudged mode results in a more realistic representation of atmospheric dynamics, e.g. by influencing the vertical velocities in the model. In addition, nudged runs suppress differences between simulations due to internal variability (compared to the free-running case) and therefore often require fewer simulated years to achieve statistical significance for the effects investigated here. Here, we compare the INP–cirrus effect between the two cases, i.e. without and with nudging (considering the case with a prescribed vertical velocity of 20 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. simulations F-CEN-V20 and F-CEN-V20-F; see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). We choose the F-CEN-V20 simulation for this comparison as this run shows large effects on cloud properties and radiation. The resulting global ERF is about 40 % larger (more negative) without nudging (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">290</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), albeit with a lower statistical significance (93.9 % confidence level; see Fig. S9). The effects on cloud properties, e.g. ICNC or cloud frequency, are generally lower (e.g. about 10 % differences between nudged and free-running set-ups). Nudging may also impact the simulated aerosol and INP concentrations; however, these changes are mostly small (below 10 %) at cirrus altitudes (data not shown), while larger changes are possible for mineral dust due to changes in the surface wind speeds influencing the wind-driven dust emissions. However, dust emissions have been extensively tuned and evaluated as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.104"/> and rely on the nudged model set-up to produce reasonable dust emission values. Therefore, the simulation results performed with the nudged model set-up are similar to the free-running case, while some influences of model nudging cannot be excluded. However, as<?pagebreak page3232?> many simulated effects would not be statistically significant in the free-running case, the nudged set-up has been applied for most simulations performed in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Uncertainties of simulated INP–cirrus effects</title>
      <p id="d1e3736">In the previous sections we analysed uncertainties regarding the simulated INP–cirrus effects related to the assumed freezing properties of INPs, the model representation of the vertical velocity, and the impact of model nudging. Further sources of uncertainties are discussed in the following. The diagnostic cloud cover scheme by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.105"/>, adopted in the present model configuration, assumes that a grid box is partly covered by clouds if the grid-mean relative humidity exceeds a critical value and totally covered if saturation is reached. For the representation of cirrus clouds, supersaturation with respect to ice is allowed; this leads to a cloud cover of 1 when ice nucleation occurs, implying that newly formed cirrus clouds always cover the whole grid box <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.106"/>. An alternative prognostic treatment of fractional cirrus cloud cover, as proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.107"/>, could reduce this uncertainty and should be the focus of future studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e3748">A further source of uncertainty in the simulated INP forcings is related to the dependencies on the applied model resolution. As discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, the lower horizontal model resolution (T42) compared to previous studies (T63, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.108"/>) can introduce a positive bias of aerosol concentrations in the upper troposphere. This leads to an increase in INP concentrations in the cirrus regime (of about a factor of 2) and would likely result in larger simulated INP effects compared to a model set-up with a higher horizontal resolution. Overall, the simulated INP concentrations of about 1 to 200 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> still agree well with in situ observations and other global model studies as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.109"/>. However, direct comparisons of simulated INP number concentrations with in situ observations in cirrus clouds are challenging, as most measurements were performed at lower altitudes and focused on mixed-phase cloud temperatures.</p>
      <p id="d1e3771">Further uncertainties of the simulated cloud modifications are related to the assumed ice-nucleating properties of the different INPs. These are not clearly resolved by measurements, which usually focus on specific types of particles (e.g. soot particles from a variety of different sources), while information on all possible particles compositions is necessarily limited. Moreover, different particle types of the same aerosol species (e.g. soot) often show a large spread of measured freezing properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.110"/>. The climate effects of ammonium sulfate and glassy organics are particularly affected by these uncertainties as measurements on their freezing properties are scarce. For example, some studies report a possible reduction in the ice-nucleating potential of ammonium sulfate due to coatings with organic material <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.111"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, which would reduce the impact of ammonium sulfate INPs on cirrus clouds. In addition, the applied phase transition scheme for ammonium sulfate particles considers only ammonium sulfate and neglects different neutralization degrees of other solid sulfate species like ammonium bi-sulfate or letovicite. Recent laboratory experiments by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.112"/> corroborated the ice-nucleating properties assumed for crystalline ammonium sulfate in the present study but found a reduction in the freezing potential of ammoniated sulfate particles depending on their degree of neutralization. Therefore, future model studies should consider the effect of different neutralization degrees for the representation of atmospheric ammonium sulfate particles and their climate impacts. While recent laboratory studies reported a low ice-nucleating potential of glassy organic particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.113"/>, thus corroborating their non-significant climate impact found in the present study, cloud processing could possibly enhance the ice-nucleating abilities of organic aerosols and enhance their impact on cirrus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.114"/>. In general, the assumption of a single <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value for the parameterization of INP-induced heterogeneous freezing in the model is a simplification, as it does not consider increasing activated fractions of INPs during the freezing process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Effects of INPs with very high ice-nucleating potential</title>
      <p id="d1e3812">As heterogeneous INPs have the potential to reduce the occurrence frequency and optical thickness of cirrus clouds consequently lowering their warming effect on the global climate, several studies proposed a climate engineering approach to reduce global warming by seeding cirrus clouds with highly efficient INPs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.115"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. In the present study, the effects of seeding cirrus clouds with different concentrations of very efficient INPs are analysed to estimate the resulting INP effects. Following the procedure described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.116"/>, different INP concentrations (ranging from 0.5 to 100 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are prescribed for every model grid box, with a critical freezing supersaturation with respect to ice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (the activated fraction is set to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and differences compared to the purely homogeneous freezing case are analysed. Vertical velocities are parameterized as in the reference case. By designing the simulation experiments according to the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.117"/>, we improve the comparability and aim to explore the robustness of the results presented here by comparing with a similar model study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3871">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> but showing multi-year averages (years 2001–2010) of the effect of highly efficient INPs (assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for different prescribed concentrations, considering changes in <bold>(a)</bold> total all-sky, <bold>(b)</bold> all-sky shortwave, <bold>(c)</bold> all-sky longwave, <bold>(d)</bold> clear-sky shortwave, <bold>(e)</bold> clear-sky longwave top-of-the-atmosphere ERF, and relative changes averaged above the 400 hPa level for <bold>(f)</bold> all-sky ICNC, <bold>(g)</bold> the fraction of homogeneously formed ice crystals, <bold>(h)</bold> total water (as the sum of water vapour and ice water), and <bold>(i)</bold> cloud occurrence frequency.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3233?><p id="d1e3941">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows the global impacts of seeding clouds with different concentrations of highly efficient INPs. In most cases seeding results in a positive global ERF (up to 86 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for an INP concentration of 100 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Only for the case with a concentration of 10 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> could a negative forcing be achieved (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a). The largest INP concentration also results in a strong increase in ICNC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>f), total water (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>h), and  cloud frequency (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>i) while almost completely inhibiting homogeneous freezing (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>g). The zonal profiles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>) reveal that the positive ERF is related to strong increases in ICNC and cloud frequency in the extratropics. Additionally, the negative longwave clear-sky ERF (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>e) is driven by reduced total water concentrations in the extratropics.</p>
      <p id="d1e4021">The heterogeneous freezing effects presented here are likely a result of the very high freezing efficiency assumed for seed INPs. This assumption implies that heterogeneous freezing is initiated at very low supersaturations with respect to ice and occurs already at low updraught speeds. For high INP concentrations, ice crystal numbers increase with respect to homogeneous freezing, as a result of the low freezing threshold (i.e. lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to homogeneous freezing. This leads to reduced sedimentation due to smaller ice crystals and increased cirrus cloud coverage, which in turn increases the global warming effect due to cirrus clouds. Our results indicate that climate engineering via cirrus cloud seeding risks an overseeding of clouds, subsequently increasing their warming effect, as also argued by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="text.118"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.119"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4041">Consistent with the results presented here, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.120"/>, employing a similar cirrus cloud scheme, also describe positive radiative effects at large concentrations of seeded INPs, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">490</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">240</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 INP L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Performing the simulations for the seeding concentration of 100 L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the free-running mode leads to an increased radiative effect and improves the comparison with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.121"/> (see Fig. S10). For smaller INP concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.122"/> found small net negative forcings, albeit with uncertainty ranges reaching positive values. Recently, <?pagebreak page3234?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.123"/> showed that cirrus cloud seeding with optimal seeding conditions, i.e. correct INP concentrations, seeding only cirrus clouds during night, could counteract global warming. Also, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.124"/> showed that choosing larger critical supersaturations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for seeding particles could reduce the overseeding effect. However, a recent study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.125"/> using a prognostic cirrus seeding aerosol species emitted along aviation soot emissions described strong overseeding and large top-of-atmosphere warming effects even when seeding was restricted to the Northern Hemisphere during winter. Consequently, the potential deleterious effects of overseeding remain, making the feasibility of this climate engineering approach highly uncertain.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e4124">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> but showing zonal averages of changes in <bold>(a)</bold> total all-sky, <bold>(b)</bold> all-sky shortwave, <bold>(c)</bold> all-sky longwave, <bold>(d)</bold> clear-sky shortwave, <bold>(e)</bold> clear-sky longwave top-of-the-atmosphere ERFs, and relative changes averaged above the 400 hPa level for <bold>(f)</bold> all-sky ICNC, <bold>(g)</bold> the fraction of homogeneously formed ice crystals, <bold>(h)</bold> total water (as the sum of water vapour and ice water), and <bold>(i)</bold> cloud occurrence frequency, considering multi-year averages over the simulated period (2001–2010). Non-significant values are shaded in grey.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/3217/2024/acp-24-3217-2024-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4173">In this study we applied the EMAC–MADE3 global aerosol climate model coupled with a two-moment cloud microphysical scheme to quantify cirrus cloud and radiation modifications due to heterogeneous freezing induced by ice-nucleating particles. In addition to the widely investigated INP species, mineral dust and soot, we also analysed the effects of ammonium sulfate and glassy organic particles, which are only rarely considered as INPs in global modelling studies. Typical mechanisms for INP-induced cirrus effects, as simulated in this study, include the reduction in ice crystal number concentrations, increased sedimentation of larger ice crystals, resulting in a thinning of cirrus clouds, and also regional reductions in cirrus cloud occurrence. On the other hand, cirrus cloud coverage can increase, as INPs freeze at lower supersaturations compared to homogeneous freezing, resulting in earlier cirrus cloud formation during adiabatic cooling in updraughts and consequently increased occurrence frequencies.</p>
      <p id="d1e4176">The interplay of the above cirrus modifications results in a net negative global radiative forcing due to INP–cirrus interactions, i.e. a cooling effect, of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming an enhanced ice-nucleating potential of INPs (by choosing a larger activated fraction) leads to about a factor of 2 larger INP–cirrus effects and results in an ERF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The simulated forcings presented here are mostly on the lower end of the range of simulated cooling effects by previous global model studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.126"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. The radiative impact of glassy organic INPs simulated here is small and mostly not significant, suggesting that heterogeneous ice nucleation of glassy organic INPs has a negligible role on the global scale. This is in line with low glassy organic INP concentrations simulated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.127"/> and low ice-nucleating abilities reported in recent laboratory studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.128"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. On the other hand, adding crystalline ammonium sulfate to an INP population consisting of mineral dust and soot results in an additional ERF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is nearly as large as the global effect of mineral dust and soot alone, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The strong impact of ammonium sulfate is related to its large simulated INP concentrations, especially in the Northern Hemisphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.129"/>. We analysed the effect of anthropogenic INPs, i.e. black carbon and ammonium sulfate related to the combustion of fossil fuels and the use of ammoniacal fertilizers, by comparing  the simulated INP–cirrus effects between present-day (2014) and pre-industrial (1750) conditions. Anthropogenic INP influences are largest in the Northern Hemisphere and amount globally to an ERF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, this anthropogenic INP–cirrus forcing is small compared with the current IPCC best estimate of the total effective radiative forcing due to aerosol–cloud interactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.130"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4356">We analyse and discuss the uncertainties regarding the INP–cirrus effects presented here. The use of model nudging can influence the simulated INP effects due to suppressing feedback mechanisms that would occur in the free-running mode. However, simulation results using the nudging technique are similar to those performed in the free-running mode. Additionally, the use of model nudging is important to achieve statistically significant results. We discuss possible model dependencies on the applied model resolution, which can influence the simulated INP concentrations, as well as cloud formation processes. For example, an increased horizontal grid resolution can lead to reduced INP number concentrations (about a factor of 2 in the cirrus regime). Therefore, the impact of the applied model resolution on the resulting climate forcing due to INPs should be the focus of future studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e4359">In additional sensitivity experiments we analyse the role of highly efficient INPs, e.g. proposed for cirrus cloud seeding as a means to reduce global warming by climate engineering. Our results show that this approach often results in the contrary effect, i.e. positive effective radiative forcings of up to 86 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, depending on the number concentration of INPs. Choosing INP concentrations that are too large often risks an overseeding of the clouds and results in strongly increased cirrus occurrence, as also stated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="text.131"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.132"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.133"/>, making the feasibility of this climate engineering approach highly uncertain.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3235?><p id="d1e4384">The INP–cirrus effects shown here are strongly dependent on the representation of the vertical velocity in the model, which controls the adiabatic cooling rate during the uplifting of air parcels. By performing sensitivity experiments with a prescribed, geographically uniform, vertical velocity, we show that increasing the vertical velocity results in larger simulated INP–cirrus effects, e.g. global ERFs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (at 1 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">340</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (at 50 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This strong sensitivity to the prescribed vertical velocity highlights the crucial role of the dynamic forcing for the simulated climate impact of INPs. The larger impact of changes in the vertical velocity with respect to the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.134"/>, where increased forcings of up to a factor of 2 were reported, is due to the differences in the investigated effects. While <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.135"/> analysed the impact of aviation soot INPs under varying updraughts, this study investigates the effect of all INPs with respect to the case of purely homogeneous freezing. The present study corroborates the sign of the INP–cirrus effect, i.e. a cooling impact, as simulated in most previous global model studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.136"/>. However, our results disagree with some previous studies in terms of the magnitude of the simulated climate forcings. This highlights the still large uncertainties in simulated INP-induced cirrus effects and the need for detailed analyses to investigate the causes of these large model diversities. Importantly, the present study suggests a strong contribution of ammonium sulfate to the simulated INP–cirrus effect, also regarding its influence on the anthropogenic INP–cirrus impact, and should be addressed in future studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e4465">In the future, more precise knowledge of the ice-nucleating properties of the different INPs from measurements, especially regarding ammonium sulfate and glassy organics, could help to further constrain their global impact in climate simulations. Additionally, research on the role of cloud-processing of INPs and its potential to enhance their ice-nucleating abilities needs to be continued. Considering the strong impact of ammonium sulfate INPs shown here, dedicated observations on atmospheric ammonium sulfate particles and further model studies could help to better constrain their climate impacts. With regard to the strong sensitivity of the simulated INP–cirrus effects on the vertical velocities in the model, dedicated field observations on atmospheric updraught speeds could help to improve the representation of vertical velocities in the model. A detailed combination of model–observation analyses on INP-induced cirrus modifications employing different measurement techniques like in situ aircraft observations, lidar measurements, and satellite remote sensing could help to constrain critical model parameters and in turn improve the simulated INP–cirrus effects. Additionally, recent advancements in the representation of INP-induced cirrus formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.137"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>,<?pagebreak page3236?> e.g. by explicitly following the freezing process along the whole activation spectrum instead of using sharp freezing thresholds, could help to improve the resulting simulated climate impacts. Regarding the wide range of simulated INP–cirrus effects from global model studies, performing commonly designed experiments in the context of intercomparison projects could increase the models inter-comparability and could help to better understand the diversity of simulated results. Notable examples of such inter-comparison exercises are the CMIP activities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.138"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and the AeroCom community (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="author.139"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="year.140"/>; see also <uri>https://aerocom.met.no/</uri>, last access: 28 February 2024). Recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.141"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.142"/> presented model analyses on the aviation soot–cirrus effect. The addition of ammonium sulfate and glassy organics as background INPs could lead to additional competitions between the different INP species and impact the simulated aviation soot effect, which should be re-evaluated in the future.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4498">MESSy is being continuously developed and applied by a consortium of institutions. The usage of MESSy, including MADE3, and access to the source code is licensed to all affiliates of institutions who are members of the MESSy Consortium. Institutions can become members of the MESSy Consortium by signing the MESSy Memorandum of Understanding. More information can be found on the MESSy Consortium website (<uri>http://www.messy-interface.org</uri>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="altparen.143"/>, last access: 22 January 2024). The model configuration discussed in this paper was developed based on version 2.54 and is part of the current EMAC release (version 2.55). The exact code version used to produce the results of this paper is archived at the German Climate Computing Center (DKRZ) and can be made available to members of the MESSy community upon request. The model set-up and the simulation data analysed in this work are available at <uri>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10276710</uri> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="altparen.144"/>).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4513">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3217-2024-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3217-2024-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4522">CGB conceived the study, implemented the model developments concerning the representation of vertical velocities and seeded INPs, designed and performed the model simulations, analysed the data, evaluated and interpreted the results, and wrote the paper. JH contributed to conceiving the study and to the model developments, the model evaluation, the interpretation of the results, and to the text. MR assisted in preparing the simulation set-up, helped design the evaluation methods, and contributed to the model developments, the interpretation of the results, and to the text.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4528">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4535">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4541">This article is part of the special issue “The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4547">The model simulations and data analysis for this work used the resources of the Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum (DKRZ) granted by its Scientific Steering Committee (WLA) under project ID bd0080. We are grateful to Elena De La Torre Castro (DLR, Germany) for her comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript and to George Craig (LMU, Germany), Patrick Jöckel, Robert Sausen, and Helmut Ziereis (DLR, Germany) for helpful discussions. We are grateful for the support of the whole MESSy team of developers and maintainers.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4552">This study has been supported by the DLR transport programme (projects “DATAMOST”, “Global model studies on the effects of transport-induced aerosols on ice clouds and climate”, “VEU2”, and “TraK”), the DLR space research programme (projects “KliSAW” and “MABAK”), the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action – BMWK (project “DoEfS”; contract no. 20X1701B), and the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association (project “ESM”).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?>publication were covered by the German Aerospace Center (DLR).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4564">This paper was edited by Manvendra Krishna Dubey and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Abbatt et~al.(2006)Abbatt, Benz, Cziczo, Kanji, Lohmann, and
M{\"{o}}hler}}?><label>Abbatt et al.(2006)Abbatt, Benz, Cziczo, Kanji, Lohmann, and Möhler</label><?label Abbatt2006?><mixed-citation>Abbatt, J. P. D., Benz, S., Cziczo, D. J., Kanji, Z., Lohmann, U., and Möhler, O.: Solid Ammonium Sulfate Aerosols as Ice Nuclei: A Pathway for Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 313, 1770–1773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1129726</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Arias et~al.(2023)Arias, Bellouin, Coppola, Jones, Krinner, Marotzke,
Naik, Palmer, Plattner, Rogelj, Rojas, Sillmann, Storelvmo, Thorne, Trewin,
Achuta~Rao, Adhikary, Allan, Armour, Bala, Barimalala, Berger, Canadell,
Cassou, Cherchi, Collins, Collins, Connors, Corti, Cruz, Dentener,
Dereczynski, Di~Luca, Diongue~Niang, Doblas-Reyes, Dosio, Douville,
Engelbrecht, Eyring, Fischer, Forster, Fox-Kemper, Fuglestvedt, Fyfe,
Gillett, Goldfarb, Gorodetskaya, Gutierrez, Hamdi, Hawkins, Hewitt, Hope
P.~and, Jones, Kaufman, Kopp, Kosaka, Kossin, Krakovska, Lee, Li, Mauritsen,
Maycock, Meinshausen, Min, Monteiro, Ngo-Duc, Otto, Pinto, Pirani, Raghavan,
Ranasinghe, Ruane, Ruiz, Sallée, Samset, Sathyendranath, Seneviratne,
S{\"{o}}rensson, Szopa, Takayabu I.~and, van~den Hurk, Vautard, von Schuckmann,
Zaehle, Zhang, and Zickfeld}}?><label>Arias et al.(2023)Arias, Bellouin, Coppola, Jones, Krinner, Marotzke, Naik, Palmer, Plattner, Rogelj, Rojas, Sillmann, Storelvmo, Thorne, Trewin, Achuta Rao, Adhikary, Allan, Armour, Bala, Barimalala, Berger, Canadell, Cassou, Cherchi, Collins, Collins, Connors, Corti, Cruz, Dentener, Dereczynski, Di Luca, Diongue Niang, Doblas-Reyes, Dosio, Douville, Engelbrecht, Eyring, Fischer, Forster, Fox-Kemper, Fuglestvedt, Fyfe, Gillett, Goldfarb, Gorodetskaya, Gutierrez, Hamdi, Hawkins, Hewitt, Hope P. and, Jones, Kaufman, Kopp, Kosaka, Kossin, Krakovska, Lee, Li, Mauritsen, Maycock, Meinshausen, Min, Monteiro, Ngo-Duc, Otto, Pinto, Pirani, Raghavan, Ranasinghe, Ruane, Ruiz, Sallée, Samset, Sathyendranath, Seneviratne, Sörensson, Szopa, Takayabu I. and, van de<?pagebreak page3237?>n Hurk, Vautard, von Schuckmann, Zaehle, Zhang, and Zickfeld</label><?label Arias2023?><mixed-citation>Arias, P., Bellouin, N., Coppola, E., Jones, R., Krinner, G., Marotzke, J., Naik, V., Palmer, M. D., Plattner, G.-K., Rogelj, J., Rojas, M., Sillmann, J., Storelvmo, T., Thorne, P. W., Trewin, B., Achuta Rao, K., Adhikary, B., Allan, R. P., Armour, K., Bala, G., Barimalala, R., Berger, S., Canadell, J. G., Cassou, C., Cherchi, A., Collins, W., Collins, W. D., Connors, S. L., Corti, S., Cruz, F., Dentener, F. J., Dereczynski, C., Di Luca, A., Diongue Niang, A., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Dosio, A., Douville, H., Engelbrecht, F., Eyring, V., Fischer, E., Forster, P., Fox-Kemper, B., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Fyfe, J. C., Gillett, N. P., Goldfarb, L., Gorodetskaya, I., Gutierrez, J. M., Hamdi, R., Hawkins, E., Hewitt, H. T., Hope P. and, Islam, A. S., Jones, C., Kaufman, D. S., Kopp, R. E., Kosaka, Y., Kossin, J., Krakovska, S., Lee, J.-Y., Li, J., Mauritsen, T., Maycock, T. K., Meinshausen, M., Min, S.-K., Monteiro, P., Ngo-Duc, T., Otto, F., Pinto, I., Pirani, A., Raghavan, K., Ranasinghe, R., Ruane, A., Ruiz, L., Sallée, J.-B., Samset, B. H., Sathyendranath, S., Seneviratne, S. I., Sörensson, A. A., Szopa, S., Takayabu I. and, Tréguier, A.-M., van den Hurk, B., Vautard, R., von Schuckmann, K., Zaehle, S., Zhang, X., and Zickfeld, K.: Technical Summary, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 35–144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.002</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Barahona et~al.(2017)Barahona, Molod, and Kalesse}}?><label>Barahona et al.(2017)Barahona, Molod, and Kalesse</label><?label Barahona2017?><mixed-citation>Barahona, D., Molod, A., and Kalesse, H.: Direct estimation of the global distribution of vertical velocity within cirrus clouds, Sci. Rep., 7, 6840, 7, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07038-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-07038-6</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baustian et~al.(2013)Baustian, Wise, Jensen, Schill, Freedman, and
Tolbert}}?><label>Baustian et al.(2013)Baustian, Wise, Jensen, Schill, Freedman, and Tolbert</label><?label Baustian2013?><mixed-citation>Baustian, K. J., Wise, M. E., Jensen, E. J., Schill, G. P., Freedman, M. A., and Tolbert, M. A.: State transformations and ice nucleation in amorphous (semi-)solid organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5615–5628, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5615-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5615-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baustian et~al.(2010)Baustian, Wise, and Tolbert}}?><label>Baustian et al.(2010)Baustian, Wise, and Tolbert</label><?label Baustian2010?><mixed-citation>Baustian, K. J., Wise, M. E., and Tolbert, M. A.: Depositional ice nucleation on solid ammonium sulfate and glutaric acid particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2307–2317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2307-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2307-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Beer(2021)}}?><label>Beer(2021)</label><?label Beer2021?><mixed-citation>Beer, C. G.: Global modelling of ice nucleating particles and their effects on cirrus clouds, PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5282/edoc.28470" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5282/edoc.28470</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Beer(2023)}}?><label>Beer(2023)</label><?label Beer2023?><mixed-citation> Beer, C.: Model simulation data used in “Impacts of ice-nucleating particles on cirrus clouds and radiation derived from global model simulations with MADE3 in EMAC” (Beer et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2024) Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10276710, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Beer et~al.(2020)Beer, Hendricks, Righi, Heinold, Tegen, Gro{\ss},
Sauer, Walser, and Weinzierl}}?><label>Beer et al.(2020)Beer, Hendricks, Righi, Heinold, Tegen, Groß, Sauer, Walser, and Weinzierl</label><?label Beer2020?><mixed-citation>Beer, C. G., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Heinold, B., Tegen, I., Groß, S., Sauer, D., Walser, A., and Weinzierl, B.: Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4287–4303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Beer et~al.(2022)Beer, Hendricks, and Righi}}?><label>Beer et al.(2022)Beer, Hendricks, and Righi</label><?label Beer2022?><mixed-citation>Beer, C. G., Hendricks, J., and Righi, M.: A global climatology of ice-nucleating particles under cirrus conditions derived from model simulations with MADE3 in EMAC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15887–15907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15887-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-15887-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bellouin et~al.(2020)Bellouin, Quaas, Gryspeerdt, Kinne, Stier,
Watson-Parris, Boucher, Carslaw, Christensen, Daniau, Dufresne, Feingold,
Fiedler, Forster, Gettelman, Haywood, Lohmann, Malavelle, Mauritsen, McCoy,
Myhre, M\"{u}lmenst\"{a}dt, Neubauer, Possner, Rugenstein, Sato, Schulz,
Schwartz, Sourdeval, Storelvmo, Toll, Winker, and Stevens}}?><label>Bellouin et al.(2020)Bellouin, Quaas, Gryspeerdt, Kinne, Stier, Watson-Parris, Boucher, Carslaw, Christensen, Daniau, Dufresne, Feingold, Fiedler, Forster, Gettelman, Haywood, Lohmann, Malavelle, Mauritsen, McCoy, Myhre, Mülmenstädt, Neubauer, Possner, Rugenstein, Sato, Schulz, Schwartz, Sourdeval, Storelvmo, Toll, Winker, and Stevens</label><?label Bellouin2020?><mixed-citation>Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson-Parris, D., Boucher, O., Carslaw, K. S., Christensen, M., Daniau, A.-L., Dufresne, J.-L., Feingold, G., Fiedler, S., Forster, P., Gettelman, A., Haywood, J. M., Lohmann, U., Malavelle, F., Mauritsen, T., McCoy, D. T., Myhre, G., Mülmenstädt, J., Neubauer, D., Possner, A., Rugenstein, M., Sato, Y., Schulz, M., Schwartz, S. E., Sourdeval, O., Storelvmo, T., Toll, V., Winker, D., and Stevens, B.: Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019rg000660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019rg000660</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bertozzi et~al.(2021)Bertozzi, Wagner, Song, Höhler, Pfeifer,
Saathoff, Leisner, and Möhler}}?><label>Bertozzi et al.(2021)Bertozzi, Wagner, Song, Höhler, Pfeifer, Saathoff, Leisner, and Möhler</label><?label Bertozzi2021?><mixed-citation>Bertozzi, B., Wagner, R., Song, J., Höhler, K., Pfeifer, J., Saathoff, H., Leisner, T., and Möhler, O.: Ice nucleation ability of ammonium sulfate aerosol particles internally mixed with secondary organics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10779–10798, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10779-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-10779-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bertozzi et~al.(2024)Bertozzi, Wagner, Höhler, Saathoff, Möhler,
and Leisner}}?><label>Bertozzi et al.(2024)Bertozzi, Wagner, Höhler, Saathoff, Möhler, and Leisner</label><?label Bertozzi2024?><mixed-citation>Bertozzi, B., Wagner, R., Höhler, K., Saathoff, H., Möhler, O., and Leisner, T.: Influence of the Neutralization Degree on the Ice Nucleation Ability of Ammoniated Sulfate Particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD040078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jd040078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023jd040078</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Boucher et~al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang}}?><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold, Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens, and Zhang</label><?label Boucher2013?><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Clouds and aerosols, in: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,  Cambridge University Press, 571–657,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chang and L'Ecuyer(2020)}}?><label>Chang and L'Ecuyer(2020)</label><?label Chang2020?><mixed-citation>Chang, K.-W. and L'Ecuyer, T.: Influence of gravity wave temperature anomalies and their vertical gradients on cirrus clouds in the tropical tropopause layer – a satellite-based view, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12499–12514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12499-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12499-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chen et~al.(2000)Chen, Rossow, and Zhang}}?><label>Chen et al.(2000)Chen, Rossow, and Zhang</label><?label Chen2000a?><mixed-citation>Chen, T., Rossow, W. B., and Zhang, Y.: Radiative Effects of Cloud-Type Variations, J. Climate, 13, 264–286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;0264:reoctv&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;0264:reoctv&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dee et~al.(2011)Dee, Uppala, Simmons, Berrisford, Poli, Kobayashi,
Andrae, Balmaseda, Balsamo, Bauer, Bechtold, Beljaars, van~de Berg, Bidlot,
Bormann, Delsol, Dragani, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hersbach,
H{\'{o}}lm, Isaksen, K{\aa}llberg, K\"{o}hler, Matricardi, McNally, Monge-Sanz,
Morcrette, Park, Peubey, de~Rosnay, Tavolato, Th{\'{e}}paut, and
Vitart}}?><label>Dee et al.(2011)Dee, Uppala, Simmons, Berrisford, Poli, Kobayashi, Andrae, Balmaseda, Balsamo, Bauer, Bechtold, Beljaars, van de Berg, Bidlot, Bormann, Delsol, Dragani, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hersbach, Hólm, Isaksen, Kållberg, Köhler, Matricardi, McNally, Monge-Sanz, Morcrette, Park, Peubey, de Rosnay, Tavolato, Thépaut, and Vitart</label><?label Dee2011?><mixed-citation>Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.828</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dietm{\"{u}}ller et~al.(2016)Dietm{\"{u}}ller, J{\"{o}}ckel, Tost, Kunze,
Gellhorn, Brinkop, Fr{\"{o}}mming, Ponater, Steil, Lauer
et~al.}}?><label>Dietmüller et al.(2016)Dietmüller, Jöckel, Tost, Kunze, Gellhorn, Brinkop, Frömming, Ponater, Steil, Lauer et al.</label><?label Dietmueller2016?><mixed-citation>Dietmüller, S., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kunze, M., Gellhorn, C., Brinkop, S., Frömming, C., Ponater, M., Steil, B., Lauer, A., and Hendricks, J.: A new radiation infrastructure for the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, based on version 2.51), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2209–2222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eyring et~al.(2016)Eyring, Bony, Meehl, Senior, Stevens, Stouffer,
and Taylor}}?><label>Eyring et al.(2016)Eyring, Bony, Meehl, Senior, Stevens, Stouffer, and Taylor</label><?label Eyring2016a?><mixed-citation>Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gasparini and Lohmann(2016)}}?><label>Gasparini and Lohmann(2016)</label><?label Gasparini2016?><mixed-citation>Gasparini, B. and Lohmann, U.: Why cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially cool the planet, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 4877–4893, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024666" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024666</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gasparini et~al.(2020)Gasparini, McGraw, Storelvmo, and
Lohmann}}?><label>Gasparini et al.(2020)Gasparini, McGraw, Storelvmo, and Lohmann</label><?label Gasparini2020?><mixed-citation>Gasparini, B., McGraw, Z., Storelvmo, T., and Lohmann, U.: To what extent can cirrus cloud seeding counteract global warming?, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 054002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab71a3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ab71a3</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gettelman et~al.(2012)Gettelman, Liu, Barahona, Lohmann, and
Chen}}?><label>Gettelman et al.(2012)Gettelman, Liu, Barahona, Lohmann, and Chen</label><?label Gettelman2012?><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Barahona, D., Lohmann, U., and Chen, C.: Climate impacts of ice nucleation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D20201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017950</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gli{\ss} et~al.(2021)Gli{\ss}, Mortier, Schulz, Andrews, Balkanski,
Bauer, Benedictow, Bian, Checa-Garcia, Chin, Ginoux, Griesfeller, Heckel,
Kipling, Kirkev{\aa}g, Kokkola, Laj, Sager, Lund, Myhre, Matsui, Myhre,
Neubauer, van Noije, North, Olivi{\'{e}}, R{\'{e}}my, Sogacheva, Takemura,
Tsigaridis, and Tsyro}}?><label>Gliß et al.(2021)Gliß, Mortier, Schulz, Andrews, Balkanski, Bauer, Benedictow, Bian, Checa-Garcia, Chin, Ginoux, Griesfeller, Heckel, Kipling, Kirkevåg, Kokkola, Laj, Sager, Lund, Myhre, Matsui, Myhre, Neubauer, van Noije, North, Olivié, Rémy, Sogacheva, Takemura, Tsigar<?pagebreak page3238?>idis, and Tsyro</label><?label Gliss2021?><mixed-citation>Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Schulz, M., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Benedictow, A. M. K., Bian, H., Checa-Garcia, R., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Griesfeller, J. J., Heckel, A., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Laj, P., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Lund Myhre, C., Matsui, H., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., van Noije, T., North, P., Olivié, D. J. L., Rémy, S., Sogacheva, L., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Tsyro, S. G.: AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 87–128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-87-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Guenther et~al.(1995)Guenther, Hewitt, Erickson, Fall, Geron,
Graedel, Harley, Klinger, Lerdau, Mckay, Pierce, Scholes, Steinbrecher,
Tallamraju, Taylor, and Zimmerman}}?><label>Guenther et al.(1995)Guenther, Hewitt, Erickson, Fall, Geron, Graedel, Harley, Klinger, Lerdau, Mckay, Pierce, Scholes, Steinbrecher, Tallamraju, Taylor, and Zimmerman</label><?label Guenther1995?><mixed-citation>Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T., Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B., Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 8873–8892, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JD02950</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hendricks et~al.(2011)Hendricks, K{\"{a}}rcher, and
Lohmann}}?><label>Hendricks et al.(2011)Hendricks, Kärcher, and Lohmann</label><?label Hendricks2011?><mixed-citation>Hendricks, J., Kärcher, B., and Lohmann, U.: Effects of ice nuclei on cirrus clouds in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D18206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015302</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hess et~al.(1998)Hess, Koepke, and Schult}}?><label>Hess et al.(1998)Hess, Koepke, and Schult</label><?label Hess1998?><mixed-citation>Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.: Optical properties of aerosols and clouds: The software package OPAC, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 831–844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoesly et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Hoesly et al.(2018)</label><?label Hoesly2018?><mixed-citation>Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoose and M\"{o}hler(2012)}}?><label>Hoose and Möhler(2012)</label><?label Hoose2012?><mixed-citation>Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ignatius et~al.(2016)Ignatius, Kristensen, J\"{a}rvinen, Nichman,
Fuchs, Gordon, Herenz, Hoyle, Duplissy, Garimella, Dias, Frege, H\"{o}ppel,
Tr\"{o}stl, Wagner, Yan, Amorim, Baltensperger, Curtius, Donahue, Gallagher,
Kirkby, Kulmala, M\"{o}hler, Saathoff, Schnaiter, Tom\'{e}, Virtanen, Worsnop,
and Stratmann}}?><label>Ignatius et al.(2016)Ignatius, Kristensen, Järvinen, Nichman, Fuchs, Gordon, Herenz, Hoyle, Duplissy, Garimella, Dias, Frege, Höppel, Tröstl, Wagner, Yan, Amorim, Baltensperger, Curtius, Donahue, Gallagher, Kirkby, Kulmala, Möhler, Saathoff, Schnaiter, Tomé, Virtanen, Worsnop, and Stratmann</label><?label Ignatius2016?><mixed-citation>Ignatius, K., Kristensen, T. B., Järvinen, E., Nichman, L., Fuchs, C., Gordon, H., Herenz, P., Hoyle, C. R., Duplissy, J., Garimella, S., Dias, A., Frege, C., Höppel, N., Tröstl, J., Wagner, R., Yan, C., Amorim, A., Baltensperger, U., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Gallagher, M. W., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Worsnop, D., and Stratmann, F.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation of viscous secondary organic aerosol produced from ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6495–6509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6495-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-6495-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{J{\"{o}}ckel et~al.(2010)J{\"{o}}ckel, Kerkweg, Pozzer, Sander, Tost,
Riede, Baumgaertner, Gromov, and Kern}}?><label>Jöckel et al.(2010)Jöckel, Kerkweg, Pozzer, Sander, Tost, Riede, Baumgaertner, Gromov, and Kern</label><?label Joeckel2010?><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H., Baumgaertner, A., Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Joos et~al.(2008)Joos, Spichtinger, Lohmann, Gayet, and
Minikin}}?><label>Joos et al.(2008)Joos, Spichtinger, Lohmann, Gayet, and Minikin</label><?label Joos2008?><mixed-citation>Joos, H., Spichtinger, P., Lohmann, U., Gayet, J.-F., and Minikin, A.: Orographic cirrus in the global climate model ECHAM5, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D18205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009605" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009605</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jöckel(2006)}}?><label>Jöckel(2006)</label><?label Joeckel2006a?><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P.: Technical note: Recursive rediscretisation of geo-scientific data in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3557–3562, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3557-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3557-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kaiser et~al.(2014)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Riemer, Zaveri, Metzger,
and Aquila}}?><label>Kaiser et al.(2014)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Riemer, Zaveri, Metzger, and Aquila</label><?label Kaiser2014?><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J. C., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Riemer, N., Zaveri, R. A., Metzger, S., and Aquila, V.: The MESSy aerosol submodel MADE3 (v2.0b): description and a box model test, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1137–1157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1137-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-1137-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kaiser et~al.(2019)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, J\"{o}ckel, Tost, Kandler,
Weinzierl, Sauer, Heimerl, Schwarz, Perring, and Popp}}?><label>Kaiser et al.(2019)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Jöckel, Tost, Kandler, Weinzierl, Sauer, Heimerl, Schwarz, Perring, and Popp</label><?label Kaiser2019?><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J. C., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kandler, K., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., Heimerl, K., Schwarz, J. P., Perring, A. E., and Popp, T.: Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 541–579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kanji et~al.(2017)Kanji, Ladino, Wex, Boose, Burkert-Kohn, Cziczo,
and Kr\"{a}mer}}?><label>Kanji et al.(2017)Kanji, Ladino, Wex, Boose, Burkert-Kohn, Cziczo, and Krämer</label><?label Kanji2017?><mixed-citation>Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteor. Monogr., 58, 1–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K{\"{a}}rcher(2017)}}?><label>Kärcher(2017)</label><?label Kaercher2017?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B.: Cirrus clouds and their response to anthropogenic activities, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 3, 45–57, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0060-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40641-017-0060-3</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{a}rcher(2022)}}?><label>Kärcher(2022)</label><?label Kaercher2022?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B.: A Parameterization of Cirrus Cloud Formation: Revisiting Competing Ice Nucleation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd036907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022jd036907</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{a}rcher and Burkhardt(2008)}}?><label>Kärcher and Burkhardt(2008)</label><?label Kaercher2008?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Burkhardt, U.: A cirrus cloud scheme for general circulation models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1439–1461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.301</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K{\"{a}}rcher and Lohmann(2002)}}?><label>Kärcher and Lohmann(2002)</label><?label Kaercher2002?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation: Homogeneous freezing of supercooled aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000470" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000470</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K{\"{a}}rcher and Lohmann(2003)}}?><label>Kärcher and Lohmann(2003)</label><?label Kaercher2003?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation: Heterogeneous freezing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003220" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003220</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K{\"{a}}rcher et~al.(2006)K{\"{a}}rcher, Hendricks, and
Lohmann}}?><label>Kärcher et al.(2006)Kärcher, Hendricks, and Lohmann</label><?label Kaercher2006?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B., Hendricks, J., and Lohmann, U.: Physically based parameterization of cirrus cloud formation for use in global atmospheric models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D01205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006219</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kasparoglu et~al.(2022)Kasparoglu, Perkins, Ziemann, DeMott,
Kreidenweis, Finewax, Deming, DeVault, and Petters}}?><label>Kasparoglu et al.(2022)Kasparoglu, Perkins, Ziemann, DeMott, Kreidenweis, Finewax, Deming, DeVault, and Petters</label><?label Kasparoglu2022?><mixed-citation>Kasparoglu, S., Perkins, R., Ziemann, P. J., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Finewax, Z., Deming, B. L., DeVault, M. P., and Petters, M. D.: Experimental Determination of the Relationship Between Organic Aerosol Viscosity and Ice Nucleation at Upper Free Tropospheric Conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD036296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD036296</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kilchhofer et~al.(2021)Kilchhofer, Mahrt, and Kanji}}?><label>Kilchhofer et al.(2021)Kilchhofer, Mahrt, and Kanji</label><?label Kilchhofer2021?><mixed-citation>Kilchhofer, K., Mahrt, F., and Kanji, Z. A.: The Role of Cloud Processing for the Ice Nucleating Ability of Organic Aerosol and Coal Fly Ash Particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033338,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jd033338" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020jd033338</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kim et~al.(2016)Kim, Alexander, Bui, Dean-Day, Lawson, Woods, Hlavka,
Pfister, and Jensen}}?><label>Kim et al.(2016)Kim, Alexander, Bui, Dean-Day, Lawson, Woods, Hlavka, Pfister, and Jensen</label><?label Kim2016?><mixed-citation>Kim, J.-E., Alexander, M. J., Bui, T. P., Dean-Day, J. M., Lawson, R. P., Woods, S., Hlavka, D., Pfister, L., and Jensen, E. J.: Ubiquitous influence of waves on tropical high cirrus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 5895–5901, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl069293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016gl069293</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Koepke et~al.(1997)Koepke, Hess, Schult, and Shettle}}?><label>Koepke et al.(1997)Koepke, Hess, Schult, and Shettle</label><?label Koepke1997?><mixed-citation> Koepke, P., Hess, M., Schult, I., and Shettle, E. P.: Global Aerosol Data Set, MPI Meteorologie Hamburg Report No. 243, https://doi.org/10.17617/2.3365749, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Koop et~al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter}}?><label>Koop et al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter</label><?label Koop2000?><mixed-citation>Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35020537</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kuebbeler et~al.(2014)Kuebbeler, Lohmann, Hendricks, and
K{\"{a}}rcher}}?><label>Kuebbeler et al.(2014)Kuebbeler, Lohmann, Hendricks, and Kärcher</label><?label Kuebbeler2014?><mixed-citation>Kuebbeler, M., Lohmann, U., Hendricks, J., and Kärcher, B.: Dust ice nuclei effects on cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3027–3046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kulkarni et~al.(2014)Kulkarni, Sanders, Zhang, Liu, and
Zhao}}?><label>Kulkarni et al.(2014)Kulkarni, Sanders, Zhang, Liu, and Zhao</label><?label Kulkarni2014?><mixed-citation>Kulkarni, G., Sanders, C., Zhang, K., Liu<?pagebreak page3239?>, X., and Zhao, C.: Ice nucleation of bare and sulfuric acid-coated mineral dust particles and implication for cloud properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9993–10011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021567" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd021567</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kulkarni et~al.(2016)Kulkarni, China, Liu, Nandasiri, Sharma, Wilson,
Aiken, Chand, Laskin, Mazzoleni, Pekour, Shilling, Shutthanandan, Zelenyuk,
and Zaveri}}?><label>Kulkarni et al.(2016)Kulkarni, China, Liu, Nandasiri, Sharma, Wilson, Aiken, Chand, Laskin, Mazzoleni, Pekour, Shilling, Shutthanandan, Zelenyuk, and Zaveri</label><?label Kulkarni2016?><mixed-citation>Kulkarni, G., China, S., Liu, S., Nandasiri, M., Sharma, N., Wilson, J., Aiken, A. C., Chand, D., Laskin, A., Mazzoleni, C., Pekour, M., Shilling, J., Shutthanandan, V., Zelenyuk, A., and Zaveri, R. A.: Ice nucleation activity of diesel soot particles at cirrus relevant temperature conditions: Effects of hydration, secondary organics coating, soot morphology, and coagulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3580–3588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068707" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL068707</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kärcher et~al.(2023)Kärcher, Marcolli, and Mahrt}}?><label>Kärcher et al.(2023)Kärcher, Marcolli, and Mahrt</label><?label Kaercher2023?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B., Marcolli, C., and Mahrt, F.: The Role of Mineral Dust Aerosol Particles in Aviation Soot-Cirrus Interactions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd037881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022jd037881</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ladino et~al.(2014)Ladino, Zhou, Yakobi-Hancock, Aljawhary, and
Abbatt}}?><label>Ladino et al.(2014)Ladino, Zhou, Yakobi-Hancock, Aljawhary, and Abbatt</label><?label Ladino2014?><mixed-citation>Ladino, L. A., Zhou, S., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Aljawhary, D., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Factors controlling the ice nucleating abilities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9041–9051, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021578" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021578</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2009)Liu, Penner, and Wang}}?><label>Liu et al.(2009)Liu, Penner, and Wang</label><?label Liu2009?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Penner, J. E., and Wang, M.: Influence of anthropogenic sulfate and black carbon on upper tropospheric clouds in the NCAR CAM3 model coupled to the IMPACT global aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D03204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010492" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010492</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2012)Liu, Shi, Zhang, Jensen, Gettelman, Barahona, Nenes,
and Lawson}}?><label>Liu et al.(2012)Liu, Shi, Zhang, Jensen, Gettelman, Barahona, Nenes, and Lawson</label><?label Liu2012?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Shi, X., Zhang, K., Jensen, E. J., Gettelman, A., Barahona, D., Nenes, A., and Lawson, P.: Sensitivity studies of dust ice nuclei effect on cirrus clouds with the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12061–12079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mahrt et~al.(2018)Mahrt, Marcolli, David, Grönquist, Meier, Lohmann,
and Kanji}}?><label>Mahrt et al.(2018)Mahrt, Marcolli, David, Grönquist, Meier, Lohmann, and Kanji</label><?label Mahrt2018?><mixed-citation>Mahrt, F., Marcolli, C., David, R. O., Grönquist, P., Barthazy Meier, E. J., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.: Ice nucleation abilities of soot particles determined with the Horizontal Ice Nucleation Chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13363–13392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13363-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-13363-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{McGraw et~al.(2020)McGraw, Storelvmo, Samset, and
Stjern}}?><label>McGraw et al.(2020)McGraw, Storelvmo, Samset, and Stjern</label><?label McGraw2020?><mixed-citation>McGraw, Z., Storelvmo, T., Samset, B. H., and Stjern, C. W.: Global Radiative Impacts of Black Carbon Acting as Ice Nucleating Particles, Geophys.  Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089056, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL089056</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{MESSy(2024)}}?><label>MESSy(2024)</label><?label MESSy2024?><mixed-citation>MESSy: Modular Earth Submodel System, <uri>http://www.messy-interface.org</uri>, last access: 22 January 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mitchell and Finnegan(2009)}}?><label>Mitchell and Finnegan(2009)</label><?label Mitchell2009?><mixed-citation>Mitchell, D. L. and Finnegan, W.: Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 045102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045102</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{M\"{o}hler et~al.(2006)M\"{o}hler, Field, Connolly, Benz, Saathoff,
Schnaiter, Wagner, Cotton, Kr\"{a}mer, Mangold, and Heymsfield}}?><label>Möhler et al.(2006)Möhler, Field, Connolly, Benz, Saathoff, Schnaiter, Wagner, Cotton, Krämer, Mangold, and Heymsfield</label><?label Moehler2006?><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Connolly, P., Benz, S., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Cotton, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3007–3021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{M{\"{u}}lmenst{\"{a}}dt and Feingold(2018)}}?><label>Mülmenstädt and Feingold(2018)</label><?label Muelmenstaedt2018?><mixed-citation>Mülmenstädt, J. and Feingold, G.: The Radiative Forcing of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Liquid Clouds: Wrestling and Embracing Uncertainty, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 4, 23–40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Muri et~al.(2014)Muri, Kristj{\'{a}}nsson, Storelvmo, and
Pfeffer}}?><label>Muri et al.(2014)Muri, Kristjánsson, Storelvmo, and Pfeffer</label><?label Muri2014?><mixed-citation>Muri, H., Kristjánsson, J. E., Storelvmo, T., and Pfeffer, M. A.: The climatic effects of modifying cirrus clouds in a climate engineering framework, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4174–4191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd021063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013jd021063</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Murray et~al.(2010)Murray, Wilson, Dobbie, Cui, Al-Jumur, M{\"{o}}hler,
Schnaiter, Wagner, Benz, Niemand, Saathoff, Ebert, Wagner, and
K\"{a}rcher}}?><label>Murray et al.(2010)Murray, Wilson, Dobbie, Cui, Al-Jumur, Möhler, Schnaiter, Wagner, Benz, Niemand, Saathoff, Ebert, Wagner, and Kärcher</label><?label Murray2010?><mixed-citation>Murray, B. J., Wilson, T. W., Dobbie, S., Cui, Z., Al-Jumur, S. M., Möhler, O., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Benz, S., Niemand, M., Saathoff, H., Ebert, V., Wagner, S., and Kärcher, B.: Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles on glassy aerosols under cirrus conditions, Nat. Geosci., 3, 233–237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO817</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Murray et~al.(2021)Murray, Carslaw, and Field}}?><label>Murray et al.(2021)Murray, Carslaw, and Field</label><?label Murray2021?><mixed-citation>Murray, B. J., Carslaw, K. S., and Field, P. R.: Opinion: Cloud-phase climate feedback and the importance of ice-nucleating particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 665–679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-665-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-665-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Penner et~al.(2009)Penner, Chen, Wang, and Liu}}?><label>Penner et al.(2009)Penner, Chen, Wang, and Liu</label><?label Penner2009?><mixed-citation>Penner, J. E., Chen, Y., Wang, M., and Liu, X.: Possible influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cirrus clouds and anthropogenic forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 879–896, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-879-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-879-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Penner et~al.(2015)Penner, Zhou, and Liu}}?><label>Penner et al.(2015)Penner, Zhou, and Liu</label><?label Penner2015?><mixed-citation>Penner, J. E., Zhou, C., and Liu, X.: Can cirrus cloud seeding be used for geoengineering?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8775–8782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl065992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015gl065992</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Penner et~al.(2018)Penner, Zhou, Garnier, and Mitchell}}?><label>Penner et al.(2018)Penner, Zhou, Garnier, and Mitchell</label><?label Penner2018?><mixed-citation>Penner, J. E., Zhou, C., Garnier, A., and Mitchell, D. L.: Anthropogenic Aerosol Indirect Effects in Cirrus Clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 11652–11677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029204</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Piedehierro et~al.(2021)Piedehierro, Welti, Buchholz, Korhonen,
Pullinen, Summanen, Virtanen, and Laaksonen}}?><label>Piedehierro et al.(2021)Piedehierro, Welti, Buchholz, Korhonen, Pullinen, Summanen, Virtanen, and Laaksonen</label><?label Piedehierro2021?><mixed-citation>Piedehierro, A. A., Welti, A., Buchholz, A., Korhonen, K., Pullinen, I., Summanen, I., Virtanen, A., and Laaksonen, A.: Ice nucleation on surrogates of boreal forest SOA particles: effect of water content and oxidative age, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11069–11078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11069-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-11069-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Podglajen et~al.(2016)Podglajen, Hertzog, Plougonven, and
Legras}}?><label>Podglajen et al.(2016)Podglajen, Hertzog, Plougonven, and Legras</label><?label Podglajen2016?><mixed-citation>Podglajen, A., Hertzog, A., Plougonven, R., and Legras, B.: Lagrangian temperature and vertical velocity fluctuations due to gravity waves in the lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3543–3553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL068148</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ramaswamy et~al.(2019)Ramaswamy, Collins, Haywood, Lean, Mahowald,
Myhre, Naik, Shine, Soden, Stenchikov, and Storelvmo}}?><label>Ramaswamy et al.(2019)Ramaswamy, Collins, Haywood, Lean, Mahowald, Myhre, Naik, Shine, Soden, Stenchikov, and Storelvmo</label><?label Ramaswamy2019?><mixed-citation>Ramaswamy, V., Collins, W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Mahowald, N., Myhre, G., Naik, V., Shine, K. P., Soden, B., Stenchikov, G., and Storelvmo, T.: Radiative Forcing of Climate: The Historical Evolution of the Radiative Forcing Concept, the Forcing Agents and their Quantification, and Applications, Meteorol. Monogr., 59, 1–101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-19-0001.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/amsmonographs-d-19-0001.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rayner et~al.(2003)Rayner, Parker, Horton, Folland, Alexander,
Rowell, Kent, and Kaplan}}?><label>Rayner et al.(2003)Rayner, Parker, Horton, Folland, Alexander, Rowell, Kent, and Kaplan</label><?label Rayner2003?><mixed-citation>Rayner, N. A., Parker, D. E., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V., Rowell, D. P., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002670" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002670</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Righi et~al.(2020)Righi, Hendricks, Lohmann, Beer, Hahn, Heinold,
Heller, Kr\"{a}mer, Ponater, Rolf, Tegen, and Voigt}}?><label>Righi et al.(2020)Righi, Hendricks, Lohmann, Beer, Hahn, Heinold, Heller, Krämer, Ponater, Rolf, Tegen, and Voigt</label><?label Righi2020?><mixed-citation>Righi, M., Hendricks, J., Lohmann, U., Beer, C. G., Hahn, V., Heinold, B., Heller, R., Krämer, M., Ponater, M., Rolf, C., Tegen, I., and Voigt, C.: Coupling aerosols to (cirrus) clouds in the global EMAC-MADE3 aerosol–climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1635–1661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Righi et~al.(2021)Righi, Hendricks, and Beer}}?><label>Righi et al.(2021)Righi, Hendricks, and Beer</label><?label Righi2021?><mixed-citation>Righi, M., Hendricks, J., and Beer, C. G.: Exploring the uncertainties in the aviation soot–cirrus effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17267–17289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17267-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-17267-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Roeckner et~al.(2006)Roeckner, Brokopf, Esch, Giorgetta, Hagemann,
Kornblueh, Manzini, Schlese, and Schulzweida}}?><label>Roeckner et al.(2006)Roeckner, Brokopf, Esch, Giorgetta, Hagemann, Kornblueh, Manzini, Schlese, and Schulzweida</label><?label Roeckner2006?><mixed-citation>Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of Simulated Climate to Horizontal and Vertical Resolution in the ECHAM5 Atmosphere Model, J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3824.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3824.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Storelvmo et~al.(2013)Storelvmo, Kristjansson, Muri, Pfeffer,
Barahona, and Nenes}}?><label>Storelvmo et al.(2013)Storelvmo, Kristjansson, Muri, Pfeffer, Barahona, and Nenes</label><?label Storelvmo2013?><mixed-citation>Storelvmo, T., Kristjansson, J. E., Muri, H., Pfeffer, M., Barahona, D., and Nenes, A.: Cirrus cloud seeding has potential to cool climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 178–182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl054201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012gl054201</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3240?><ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sundqvist et~al.(1989)Sundqvist, Berge, and
Kristj{\'{a}}nsson}}?><label>Sundqvist et al.(1989)Sundqvist, Berge, and Kristjánsson</label><?label Sundqvist1989?><mixed-citation>Sundqvist, H., Berge, E., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: Condensation and Cloud Parameterization Studies with a Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1641–1657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;1641:cacpsw&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;1641:cacpsw&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Szopa et~al.(2021)Szopa, Naik, Adhikary, Artaxo, Berntsen, Collins,
Fuzzi, Gallardo, Kiendler-Scharr, Klimont, Liao, Unger, and
Zanis}}?><label>Szopa et al.(2021)Szopa, Naik, Adhikary, Artaxo, Berntsen, Collins, Fuzzi, Gallardo, Kiendler-Scharr, Klimont, Liao, Unger, and Zanis</label><?label Szopa2021?><mixed-citation>Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 817–922,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.008</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tegen et~al.(2002)Tegen, Harrison, Kohfeld, Prentice, Coe, and
Heimann}}?><label>Tegen et al.(2002)Tegen, Harrison, Kohfeld, Prentice, Coe, and Heimann</label><?label Tegen2002?><mixed-citation>Tegen, I., Harrison, S. P., Kohfeld, K., Prentice, I. C., Coe, M., and Heimann, M.: Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust aerosol: Results from a model study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 1–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000963" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000963</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tully et~al.(2022)Tully, Neubauer, Omanovic, and Lohmann}}?><label>Tully et al.(2022)Tully, Neubauer, Omanovic, and Lohmann</label><?label Tully2022?><mixed-citation>Tully, C., Neubauer, D., Omanovic, N., and Lohmann, U.: Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11455–11484, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11455-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-11455-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tully et~al.(2023)Tully, Neubauer, Villanueva, and
Lohmann}}?><label>Tully et al.(2023)Tully, Neubauer, Villanueva, and Lohmann</label><?label Tully2023a?><mixed-citation>Tully, C., Neubauer, D., Villanueva, D., and Lohmann, U.: Does prognostic seeding along flight tracks produce the desired effects of cirrus cloud thinning?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7673–7698, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7673-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-7673-2023</ext-link>, 2023. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{van Marle et~al.(2017)van Marle, Kloster, Magi, Marlon, Daniau,
Field, Arneth, Forrest, Hantson, Kehrwald, Knorr, Lasslop, Li, Mangeon, Yue,
Kaiser, and van~der Werf}}?><label>van Marle et al.(2017)van Marle, Kloster, Magi, Marlon, Daniau, Field, Arneth, Forrest, Hantson, Kehrwald, Knorr, Lasslop, Li, Mangeon, Yue, Kaiser, and van der Werf</label><?label Marle2017?><mixed-citation>van Marle, M. J. E., Kloster, S., Magi, B. I., Marlon, J. R., Daniau, A.-L., Field, R. D., Arneth, A., Forrest, M., Hantson, S., Kehrwald, N. M., Knorr, W., Lasslop, G., Li, F., Mangeon, S., Yue, C., Kaiser, J. W., and van der Werf, G. R.: Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750–2015), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3329–3357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wagner et~al.(2017)Wagner, H{\"{o}}hler, Huang, Kiselev, M{\"{o}}hler,
Mohr, Pajunoja, Saathoff, Schiebel, Shen, and Virtanen}}?><label>Wagner et al.(2017)Wagner, Höhler, Huang, Kiselev, Möhler, Mohr, Pajunoja, Saathoff, Schiebel, Shen, and Virtanen</label><?label Wagner2017?><mixed-citation>Wagner, R., Höhler, K., Huang, W., Kiselev, A., Möhler, O., Mohr, C., Pajunoja, A., Saathoff, H., Schiebel, T., Shen, X., and Virtanen, A.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA particles before and after ice cloud processing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4924–4943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD026401</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2014)Wang, Liu, Zhang, and Comstock}}?><label>Wang et al.(2014)Wang, Liu, Zhang, and Comstock</label><?label Wang2014?><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Liu, X., Zhang, K., and Comstock, J. M.: Aerosol effects on cirrus through ice nucleation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 with a statistical cirrus scheme, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 756–776, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014ms000339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014ms000339</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhou and Penner(2014)}}?><label>Zhou and Penner(2014)</label><?label Zhou2014?><mixed-citation>Zhou, C. and Penner, J. E.: Aircraft soot indirect effect on large-scale cirrus clouds: Is the indirect forcing by aircraft soot positive or negative?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 11303–11320,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021914" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021914</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhu and Penner(2020)}}?><label>Zhu and Penner(2020)</label><?label Zhu2020?><mixed-citation>Zhu, J. and Penner, J. E.: Radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols on cirrus clouds using a hybrid ice nucleation scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7801–7827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7801-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-7801-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Impacts of ice-nucleating particles on cirrus clouds and radiation derived from global model simulations with MADE3 in EMAC</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Abbatt et al.(2006)Abbatt, Benz, Cziczo, Kanji, Lohmann, and
Möhler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abbatt, J. P. D., Benz, S., Cziczo, D. J., Kanji, Z., Lohmann, U., and
Möhler, O.: Solid Ammonium Sulfate Aerosols as Ice Nuclei: A Pathway for
Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 313, 1770–1773,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129726</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Arias et al.(2023)Arias, Bellouin, Coppola, Jones, Krinner, Marotzke,
Naik, Palmer, Plattner, Rogelj, Rojas, Sillmann, Storelvmo, Thorne, Trewin,
Achuta Rao, Adhikary, Allan, Armour, Bala, Barimalala, Berger, Canadell,
Cassou, Cherchi, Collins, Collins, Connors, Corti, Cruz, Dentener,
Dereczynski, Di Luca, Diongue Niang, Doblas-Reyes, Dosio, Douville,
Engelbrecht, Eyring, Fischer, Forster, Fox-Kemper, Fuglestvedt, Fyfe,
Gillett, Goldfarb, Gorodetskaya, Gutierrez, Hamdi, Hawkins, Hewitt, Hope
P. and, Jones, Kaufman, Kopp, Kosaka, Kossin, Krakovska, Lee, Li, Mauritsen,
Maycock, Meinshausen, Min, Monteiro, Ngo-Duc, Otto, Pinto, Pirani, Raghavan,
Ranasinghe, Ruane, Ruiz, Sallée, Samset, Sathyendranath, Seneviratne,
Sörensson, Szopa, Takayabu I. and, van den Hurk, Vautard, von Schuckmann,
Zaehle, Zhang, and Zickfeld</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arias, P., Bellouin, N., Coppola, E., Jones, R., Krinner, G., Marotzke, J.,
Naik, V., Palmer, M. D., Plattner, G.-K., Rogelj, J., Rojas, M., Sillmann,
J., Storelvmo, T., Thorne, P. W., Trewin, B., Achuta Rao, K., Adhikary, B.,
Allan, R. P., Armour, K., Bala, G., Barimalala, R., Berger, S., Canadell,
J. G., Cassou, C., Cherchi, A., Collins, W., Collins, W. D., Connors, S. L.,
Corti, S., Cruz, F., Dentener, F. J., Dereczynski, C., Di Luca, A.,
Diongue Niang, A., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Dosio, A., Douville, H., Engelbrecht,
F., Eyring, V., Fischer, E., Forster, P., Fox-Kemper, B., Fuglestvedt, J. S.,
Fyfe, J. C., Gillett, N. P., Goldfarb, L., Gorodetskaya, I., Gutierrez,
J. M., Hamdi, R., Hawkins, E., Hewitt, H. T., Hope P. and, Islam, A. S.,
Jones, C., Kaufman, D. S., Kopp, R. E., Kosaka, Y., Kossin, J., Krakovska,
S., Lee, J.-Y., Li, J., Mauritsen, T., Maycock, T. K., Meinshausen, M., Min,
S.-K., Monteiro, P., Ngo-Duc, T., Otto, F., Pinto, I., Pirani, A., Raghavan,
K., Ranasinghe, R., Ruane, A., Ruiz, L., Sallée, J.-B., Samset, B. H.,
Sathyendranath, S., Seneviratne, S. I., Sörensson, A. A., Szopa, S.,
Takayabu I. and, Tréguier, A.-M., van den Hurk, B., Vautard, R., von
Schuckmann, K., Zaehle, S., Zhang, X., and Zickfeld, K.: Technical Summary,
in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 35–144,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.002</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Barahona et al.(2017)Barahona, Molod, and Kalesse</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barahona, D., Molod, A., and Kalesse, H.: Direct estimation of the global
distribution of vertical velocity within cirrus clouds, Sci. Rep., 7, 6840,
7, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07038-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07038-6</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Baustian et al.(2013)Baustian, Wise, Jensen, Schill, Freedman, and
Tolbert</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baustian, K. J., Wise, M. E., Jensen, E. J., Schill, G. P., Freedman, M. A., and Tolbert, M. A.: State transformations and ice nucleation in amorphous (semi-)solid organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5615–5628, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5615-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5615-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Baustian et al.(2010)Baustian, Wise, and Tolbert</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baustian, K. J., Wise, M. E., and Tolbert, M. A.: Depositional ice nucleation on solid ammonium sulfate and glutaric acid particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2307–2317, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2307-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2307-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Beer(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beer, C. G.: Global modelling of ice nucleating particles and their effects on
cirrus clouds, PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5282/edoc.28470" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5282/edoc.28470</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Beer(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beer, C.: Model simulation data used in “Impacts of ice-nucleating particles on cirrus clouds and radiation derived from global model simulations with MADE3 in EMAC” (Beer et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2024) Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10276710, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Beer et al.(2020)Beer, Hendricks, Righi, Heinold, Tegen, Groß,
Sauer, Walser, and Weinzierl</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beer, C. G., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Heinold, B., Tegen, I., Groß, S., Sauer, D., Walser, A., and Weinzierl, B.: Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4287–4303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Beer et al.(2022)Beer, Hendricks, and Righi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beer, C. G., Hendricks, J., and Righi, M.: A global climatology of ice-nucleating particles under cirrus conditions derived from model simulations with MADE3 in EMAC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15887–15907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15887-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15887-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bellouin et al.(2020)Bellouin, Quaas, Gryspeerdt, Kinne, Stier,
Watson-Parris, Boucher, Carslaw, Christensen, Daniau, Dufresne, Feingold,
Fiedler, Forster, Gettelman, Haywood, Lohmann, Malavelle, Mauritsen, McCoy,
Myhre, Mülmenstädt, Neubauer, Possner, Rugenstein, Sato, Schulz,
Schwartz, Sourdeval, Storelvmo, Toll, Winker, and Stevens</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson-Parris,
D., Boucher, O., Carslaw, K. S., Christensen, M., Daniau, A.-L., Dufresne,
J.-L., Feingold, G., Fiedler, S., Forster, P., Gettelman, A., Haywood, J. M.,
Lohmann, U., Malavelle, F., Mauritsen, T., McCoy, D. T., Myhre, G.,
Mülmenstädt, J., Neubauer, D., Possner, A., Rugenstein, M., Sato, Y.,
Schulz, M., Schwartz, S. E., Sourdeval, O., Storelvmo, T., Toll, V., Winker,
D., and Stevens, B.: Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate
Change, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019rg000660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019rg000660</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Bertozzi et al.(2021)Bertozzi, Wagner, Song, Höhler, Pfeifer,
Saathoff, Leisner, and Möhler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bertozzi, B., Wagner, R., Song, J., Höhler, K., Pfeifer, J., Saathoff, H., Leisner, T., and Möhler, O.: Ice nucleation ability of ammonium sulfate aerosol particles internally mixed with secondary organics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10779–10798, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10779-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10779-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Bertozzi et al.(2024)Bertozzi, Wagner, Höhler, Saathoff, Möhler,
and Leisner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bertozzi, B., Wagner, R., Höhler, K., Saathoff, H., Möhler, O., and Leisner,
T.: Influence of the Neutralization Degree on the Ice Nucleation Ability of
Ammoniated Sulfate Particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD040078,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jd040078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jd040078</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Clouds and aerosols, in:
Climate change 2013: the physical science basis, Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change,  Cambridge University Press,
571–657,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chang and L'Ecuyer(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, K.-W. and L'Ecuyer, T.: Influence of gravity wave temperature anomalies and their vertical gradients on cirrus clouds in the tropical tropopause layer – a satellite-based view, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12499–12514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12499-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12499-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Chen et al.(2000)Chen, Rossow, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, T., Rossow, W. B., and Zhang, Y.: Radiative Effects of Cloud-Type
Variations, J. Climate, 13, 264–286,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;0264:reoctv&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;0264:reoctv&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Dee et al.(2011)Dee, Uppala, Simmons, Berrisford, Poli, Kobayashi,
Andrae, Balmaseda, Balsamo, Bauer, Bechtold, Beljaars, van de Berg, Bidlot,
Bormann, Delsol, Dragani, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hersbach,
Hólm, Isaksen, Kållberg, Köhler, Matricardi, McNally, Monge-Sanz,
Morcrette, Park, Peubey, de Rosnay, Tavolato, Thépaut, and
Vitart</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C.,
Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M.,
Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park,
B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and
Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of
the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Dietmüller et al.(2016)Dietmüller, Jöckel, Tost, Kunze,
Gellhorn, Brinkop, Frömming, Ponater, Steil, Lauer
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dietmüller, S., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kunze, M., Gellhorn, C., Brinkop, S., Frömming, C., Ponater, M., Steil, B., Lauer, A., and Hendricks, J.: A new radiation infrastructure for the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, based on version 2.51), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2209–2222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Eyring et al.(2016)Eyring, Bony, Meehl, Senior, Stevens, Stouffer,
and Taylor</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Gasparini and Lohmann(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasparini, B. and Lohmann, U.: Why cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially
cool the planet, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 4877–4893,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024666" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024666</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Gasparini et al.(2020)Gasparini, McGraw, Storelvmo, and
Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasparini, B., McGraw, Z., Storelvmo, T., and Lohmann, U.: To what extent can
cirrus cloud seeding counteract global warming?, Environ. Res. Lett., 15,
054002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab71a3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab71a3</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Gettelman et al.(2012)Gettelman, Liu, Barahona, Lohmann, and
Chen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Barahona, D., Lohmann, U., and Chen, C.: Climate
impacts of ice nucleation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D20201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017950" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017950</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Gliß et al.(2021)Gliß, Mortier, Schulz, Andrews, Balkanski,
Bauer, Benedictow, Bian, Checa-Garcia, Chin, Ginoux, Griesfeller, Heckel,
Kipling, Kirkevåg, Kokkola, Laj, Sager, Lund, Myhre, Matsui, Myhre,
Neubauer, van Noije, North, Olivié, Rémy, Sogacheva, Takemura,
Tsigaridis, and Tsyro</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Schulz, M., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Benedictow, A. M. K., Bian, H., Checa-Garcia, R., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Griesfeller, J. J., Heckel, A., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Laj, P., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Lund Myhre, C., Matsui, H., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., van Noije, T., North, P., Olivié, D. J. L., Rémy, S., Sogacheva, L., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Tsyro, S. G.: AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 87–128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Guenther et al.(1995)Guenther, Hewitt, Erickson, Fall, Geron,
Graedel, Harley, Klinger, Lerdau, Mckay, Pierce, Scholes, Steinbrecher,
Tallamraju, Taylor, and Zimmerman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T.,
Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B.,
Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A global
model of natural volatile organic compound emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 100,
8873–8892, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02950" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02950</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Hendricks et al.(2011)Hendricks, Kärcher, and
Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hendricks, J., Kärcher, B., and Lohmann, U.: Effects of ice nuclei on
cirrus clouds in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116,
D18206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015302</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hess et al.(1998)Hess, Koepke, and Schult</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.: Optical properties of aerosols and
clouds: The software package OPAC, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 831–844,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hoesly et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Hoose and Möhler(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Ignatius et al.(2016)Ignatius, Kristensen, Järvinen, Nichman,
Fuchs, Gordon, Herenz, Hoyle, Duplissy, Garimella, Dias, Frege, Höppel,
Tröstl, Wagner, Yan, Amorim, Baltensperger, Curtius, Donahue, Gallagher,
Kirkby, Kulmala, Möhler, Saathoff, Schnaiter, Tomé, Virtanen, Worsnop,
and Stratmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ignatius, K., Kristensen, T. B., Järvinen, E., Nichman, L., Fuchs, C., Gordon, H., Herenz, P., Hoyle, C. R., Duplissy, J., Garimella, S., Dias, A., Frege, C., Höppel, N., Tröstl, J., Wagner, R., Yan, C., Amorim, A., Baltensperger, U., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Gallagher, M. W., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Worsnop, D., and Stratmann, F.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation of viscous secondary organic aerosol produced from ozonolysis of <i>α</i>-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6495–6509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6495-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6495-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Jöckel et al.(2010)Jöckel, Kerkweg, Pozzer, Sander, Tost,
Riede, Baumgaertner, Gromov, and Kern</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H., Baumgaertner, A., Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Joos et al.(2008)Joos, Spichtinger, Lohmann, Gayet, and
Minikin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Joos, H., Spichtinger, P., Lohmann, U., Gayet, J.-F., and Minikin, A.:
Orographic cirrus in the global climate model ECHAM5, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D18205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009605" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009605</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Jöckel(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jöckel, P.: Technical note: Recursive rediscretisation of geo-scientific data in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3557–3562, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3557-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3557-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kaiser et al.(2014)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Riemer, Zaveri, Metzger,
and Aquila</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaiser, J. C., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Riemer, N., Zaveri, R. A., Metzger, S., and Aquila, V.: The MESSy aerosol submodel MADE3 (v2.0b): description and a box model test, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1137–1157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1137-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1137-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kaiser et al.(2019)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Jöckel, Tost, Kandler,
Weinzierl, Sauer, Heimerl, Schwarz, Perring, and Popp</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaiser, J. C., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kandler, K., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., Heimerl, K., Schwarz, J. P., Perring, A. E., and Popp, T.: Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 541–579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kanji et al.(2017)Kanji, Ladino, Wex, Boose, Burkert-Kohn, Cziczo,
and Krämer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo,
D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteor.
Monogr., 58, 1–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kärcher(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B.: Cirrus clouds and their response to anthropogenic activities,
Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 3, 45–57, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0060-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0060-3</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Kärcher(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B.: A Parameterization of Cirrus Cloud Formation: Revisiting
Competing Ice Nucleation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036907,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd036907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd036907</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Kärcher and Burkhardt(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B. and Burkhardt, U.: A cirrus cloud scheme for general circulation
models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1439–1461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.301</a>,
2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Kärcher and Lohmann(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation:
Homogeneous freezing of supercooled aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107,
4010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000470" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000470</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Kärcher and Lohmann(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B. and Lohmann, U.: A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation:
Heterogeneous freezing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4402,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003220</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Kärcher et al.(2006)Kärcher, Hendricks, and
Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B., Hendricks, J., and Lohmann, U.: Physically based
parameterization of cirrus cloud formation for use in global atmospheric
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D01205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006219</a>,
2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Kasparoglu et al.(2022)Kasparoglu, Perkins, Ziemann, DeMott,
Kreidenweis, Finewax, Deming, DeVault, and Petters</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kasparoglu, S., Perkins, R., Ziemann, P. J., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M.,
Finewax, Z., Deming, B. L., DeVault, M. P., and Petters, M. D.: Experimental
Determination of the Relationship Between Organic Aerosol Viscosity and Ice
Nucleation at Upper Free Tropospheric Conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
127, e2021JD036296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036296</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Kilchhofer et al.(2021)Kilchhofer, Mahrt, and Kanji</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kilchhofer, K., Mahrt, F., and Kanji, Z. A.: The Role of Cloud Processing for
the Ice Nucleating Ability of Organic Aerosol and Coal Fly Ash Particles, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033338,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jd033338" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jd033338</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Kim et al.(2016)Kim, Alexander, Bui, Dean-Day, Lawson, Woods, Hlavka,
Pfister, and Jensen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, J.-E., Alexander, M. J., Bui, T. P., Dean-Day, J. M., Lawson, R. P.,
Woods, S., Hlavka, D., Pfister, L., and Jensen, E. J.: Ubiquitous influence
of waves on tropical high cirrus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 5895–5901,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl069293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl069293</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Koepke et al.(1997)Koepke, Hess, Schult, and Shettle</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koepke, P., Hess, M., Schult, I., and Shettle, E. P.: Global Aerosol Data Set, MPI Meteorologie Hamburg Report No. 243, https://doi.org/10.17617/2.3365749, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Koop et al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant
for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Kuebbeler et al.(2014)Kuebbeler, Lohmann, Hendricks, and
Kärcher</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuebbeler, M., Lohmann, U., Hendricks, J., and Kärcher, B.: Dust ice nuclei effects on cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3027–3046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Kulkarni et al.(2014)Kulkarni, Sanders, Zhang, Liu, and
Zhao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kulkarni, G., Sanders, C., Zhang, K., Liu, X., and Zhao, C.: Ice nucleation of
bare and sulfuric acid-coated mineral dust particles and implication for
cloud properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9993–10011,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021567" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021567</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Kulkarni et al.(2016)Kulkarni, China, Liu, Nandasiri, Sharma, Wilson,
Aiken, Chand, Laskin, Mazzoleni, Pekour, Shilling, Shutthanandan, Zelenyuk,
and Zaveri</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kulkarni, G., China, S., Liu, S., Nandasiri, M., Sharma, N., Wilson, J., Aiken,
A. C., Chand, D., Laskin, A., Mazzoleni, C., Pekour, M., Shilling, J.,
Shutthanandan, V., Zelenyuk, A., and Zaveri, R. A.: Ice nucleation activity
of diesel soot particles at cirrus relevant temperature conditions: Effects
of hydration, secondary organics coating, soot morphology, and coagulation,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3580–3588, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068707" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068707</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Kärcher et al.(2023)Kärcher, Marcolli, and Mahrt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B., Marcolli, C., and Mahrt, F.: The Role of Mineral Dust Aerosol
Particles in Aviation Soot-Cirrus Interactions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd037881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd037881</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Ladino et al.(2014)Ladino, Zhou, Yakobi-Hancock, Aljawhary, and
Abbatt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ladino, L. A., Zhou, S., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Aljawhary, D., and Abbatt, J.
P. D.: Factors controlling the ice nucleating abilities of <i>α</i>-pinene
SOA particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 9041–9051,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021578" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021578</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Liu et al.(2009)Liu, Penner, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Penner, J. E., and Wang, M.: Influence of anthropogenic sulfate and
black carbon on upper tropospheric clouds in the NCAR CAM3 model coupled
to the IMPACT global aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D03204,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010492" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010492</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Liu et al.(2012)Liu, Shi, Zhang, Jensen, Gettelman, Barahona, Nenes,
and Lawson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Shi, X., Zhang, K., Jensen, E. J., Gettelman, A., Barahona, D., Nenes, A., and Lawson, P.: Sensitivity studies of dust ice nuclei effect on cirrus clouds with the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12061–12079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12061-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Mahrt et al.(2018)Mahrt, Marcolli, David, Grönquist, Meier, Lohmann,
and Kanji</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mahrt, F., Marcolli, C., David, R. O., Grönquist, P., Barthazy Meier, E. J., Lohmann, U., and Kanji, Z. A.: Ice nucleation abilities of soot particles determined with the Horizontal Ice Nucleation Chamber, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13363–13392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13363-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13363-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>McGraw et al.(2020)McGraw, Storelvmo, Samset, and
Stjern</label><mixed-citation>
      
McGraw, Z., Storelvmo, T., Samset, B. H., and Stjern, C. W.: Global Radiative
Impacts of Black Carbon Acting as Ice Nucleating Particles, Geophys.  Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089056, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089056</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>MESSy(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
MESSy: Modular Earth Submodel System, <a href="http://www.messy-interface.org" target="_blank"/>, last access: 22 January 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Mitchell and Finnegan(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mitchell, D. L. and Finnegan, W.: Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce
global warming, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 045102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045102</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Möhler et al.(2006)Möhler, Field, Connolly, Benz, Saathoff,
Schnaiter, Wagner, Cotton, Krämer, Mangold, and Heymsfield</label><mixed-citation>
      
Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Connolly, P., Benz, S., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Cotton, R., Krämer, M., Mangold, A., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Efficiency of the deposition mode ice nucleation on mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3007–3021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3007-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Mülmenstädt and Feingold(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mülmenstädt, J. and Feingold, G.: The Radiative Forcing of
Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Liquid Clouds: Wrestling and Embracing
Uncertainty, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 4, 23–40,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Muri et al.(2014)Muri, Kristjánsson, Storelvmo, and
Pfeffer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Muri, H., Kristjánsson, J. E., Storelvmo, T., and Pfeffer, M. A.: The
climatic effects of modifying cirrus clouds in a climate engineering
framework, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4174–4191,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd021063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd021063</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Murray et al.(2010)Murray, Wilson, Dobbie, Cui, Al-Jumur, Möhler,
Schnaiter, Wagner, Benz, Niemand, Saathoff, Ebert, Wagner, and
Kärcher</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murray, B. J., Wilson, T. W., Dobbie, S., Cui, Z., Al-Jumur, S. M., Möhler,
O., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Benz, S., Niemand, M., Saathoff, H., Ebert,
V., Wagner, S., and Kärcher, B.: Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles
on glassy aerosols under cirrus conditions, Nat. Geosci., 3, 233–237,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO817</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Murray et al.(2021)Murray, Carslaw, and Field</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murray, B. J., Carslaw, K. S., and Field, P. R.: Opinion: Cloud-phase climate feedback and the importance of ice-nucleating particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 665–679, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-665-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-665-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Penner et al.(2009)Penner, Chen, Wang, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Penner, J. E., Chen, Y., Wang, M., and Liu, X.: Possible influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cirrus clouds and anthropogenic forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 879–896, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-879-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-879-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Penner et al.(2015)Penner, Zhou, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Penner, J. E., Zhou, C., and Liu, X.: Can cirrus cloud seeding be used for
geoengineering?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8775–8782,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl065992" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl065992</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Penner et al.(2018)Penner, Zhou, Garnier, and Mitchell</label><mixed-citation>
      
Penner, J. E., Zhou, C., Garnier, A., and Mitchell, D. L.: Anthropogenic
Aerosol Indirect Effects in Cirrus Clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
11652–11677, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029204" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029204</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Piedehierro et al.(2021)Piedehierro, Welti, Buchholz, Korhonen,
Pullinen, Summanen, Virtanen, and Laaksonen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Piedehierro, A. A., Welti, A., Buchholz, A., Korhonen, K., Pullinen, I., Summanen, I., Virtanen, A., and Laaksonen, A.: Ice nucleation on surrogates of boreal forest SOA particles: effect of water content and oxidative age, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11069–11078, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11069-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11069-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Podglajen et al.(2016)Podglajen, Hertzog, Plougonven, and
Legras</label><mixed-citation>
      
Podglajen, A., Hertzog, A., Plougonven, R., and Legras, B.: Lagrangian
temperature and vertical velocity fluctuations due to gravity waves in the
lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3543–3553,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068148" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068148</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Ramaswamy et al.(2019)Ramaswamy, Collins, Haywood, Lean, Mahowald,
Myhre, Naik, Shine, Soden, Stenchikov, and Storelvmo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ramaswamy, V., Collins, W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Mahowald, N., Myhre, G.,
Naik, V., Shine, K. P., Soden, B., Stenchikov, G., and Storelvmo, T.:
Radiative Forcing of Climate: The Historical Evolution of the Radiative
Forcing Concept, the Forcing Agents and their Quantification, and
Applications, Meteorol. Monogr., 59, 1–101,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-19-0001.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-19-0001.1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Rayner et al.(2003)Rayner, Parker, Horton, Folland, Alexander,
Rowell, Kent, and Kaplan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rayner, N. A., Parker, D. E., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V.,
Rowell, D. P., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea surface
temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late
nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002670" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002670</a>,
2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Righi et al.(2020)Righi, Hendricks, Lohmann, Beer, Hahn, Heinold,
Heller, Krämer, Ponater, Rolf, Tegen, and Voigt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Righi, M., Hendricks, J., Lohmann, U., Beer, C. G., Hahn, V., Heinold, B., Heller, R., Krämer, M., Ponater, M., Rolf, C., Tegen, I., and Voigt, C.: Coupling aerosols to (cirrus) clouds in the global EMAC-MADE3 aerosol–climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1635–1661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Righi et al.(2021)Righi, Hendricks, and Beer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Righi, M., Hendricks, J., and Beer, C. G.: Exploring the uncertainties in the aviation soot–cirrus effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17267–17289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17267-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17267-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Roeckner et al.(2006)Roeckner, Brokopf, Esch, Giorgetta, Hagemann,
Kornblueh, Manzini, Schlese, and Schulzweida</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh,
L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of Simulated
Climate to Horizontal and Vertical Resolution in the ECHAM5 Atmosphere
Model, J. Climate, 19, 3771–3791, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3824.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3824.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Storelvmo et al.(2013)Storelvmo, Kristjansson, Muri, Pfeffer,
Barahona, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
      
Storelvmo, T., Kristjansson, J. E., Muri, H., Pfeffer, M., Barahona, D., and
Nenes, A.: Cirrus cloud seeding has potential to cool climate, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 178–182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl054201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl054201</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Sundqvist et al.(1989)Sundqvist, Berge, and
Kristjánsson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sundqvist, H., Berge, E., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: Condensation and Cloud
Parameterization Studies with a Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model,
Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1641–1657,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;1641:cacpsw&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;1641:cacpsw&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Szopa et al.(2021)Szopa, Naik, Adhikary, Artaxo, Berntsen, Collins,
Fuzzi, Gallardo, Kiendler-Scharr, Klimont, Liao, Unger, and
Zanis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W.,
Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger,
N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The
Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
Cambridge University Press, 817–922,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Tegen et al.(2002)Tegen, Harrison, Kohfeld, Prentice, Coe, and
Heimann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tegen, I., Harrison, S. P., Kohfeld, K., Prentice, I. C., Coe, M., and Heimann,
M.: Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust
aerosol: Results from a model study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107,
1–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000963" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000963</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Tully et al.(2022)Tully, Neubauer, Omanovic, and Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tully, C., Neubauer, D., Omanovic, N., and Lohmann, U.: Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11455–11484, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11455-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11455-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Tully et al.(2023)Tully, Neubauer, Villanueva, and
Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tully, C., Neubauer, D., Villanueva, D., and Lohmann, U.: Does prognostic seeding along flight tracks produce the desired effects of cirrus cloud thinning?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7673–7698, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7673-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7673-2023</a>, 2023.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>van Marle et al.(2017)van Marle, Kloster, Magi, Marlon, Daniau,
Field, Arneth, Forrest, Hantson, Kehrwald, Knorr, Lasslop, Li, Mangeon, Yue,
Kaiser, and van der Werf</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Marle, M. J. E., Kloster, S., Magi, B. I., Marlon, J. R., Daniau, A.-L., Field, R. D., Arneth, A., Forrest, M., Hantson, S., Kehrwald, N. M., Knorr, W., Lasslop, G., Li, F., Mangeon, S., Yue, C., Kaiser, J. W., and van der Werf, G. R.: Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750–2015), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3329–3357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Wagner et al.(2017)Wagner, Höhler, Huang, Kiselev, Möhler,
Mohr, Pajunoja, Saathoff, Schiebel, Shen, and Virtanen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wagner, R., Höhler, K., Huang, W., Kiselev, A., Möhler, O., Mohr, C.,
Pajunoja, A., Saathoff, H., Schiebel, T., Shen, X., and Virtanen, A.:
Heterogeneous ice nucleation of <i>α</i>-pinene SOA particles before and
after ice cloud processing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4924–4943,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026401</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Wang et al.(2014)Wang, Liu, Zhang, and Comstock</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, M., Liu, X., Zhang, K., and Comstock, J. M.: Aerosol effects on cirrus
through ice nucleation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 with a
statistical cirrus scheme, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 756–776,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014ms000339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014ms000339</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Zhou and Penner(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, C. and Penner, J. E.: Aircraft soot indirect effect on large-scale cirrus
clouds: Is the indirect forcing by aircraft soot positive or negative?, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 11303–11320,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021914" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021914</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Zhu and Penner(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhu, J. and Penner, J. E.: Radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols on cirrus clouds using a hybrid ice nucleation scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7801–7827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7801-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7801-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
