<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-24-2319-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>Contrail formation on ambient aerosol particles <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> for aircraft with hydrogen combustion: <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> a box model trajectory study</article-title><alt-title>Contrail formation on ambient aerosol particles</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Contrail formation on ambient aerosol particles}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Bier et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Bier</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Unterstrasser</surname><given-names>Simon</given-names></name>
          <email>simon.unterstrasser@dlr.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-3678</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Zink</surname><given-names>Josef</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4874-8501</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Hillenbrand</surname><given-names>Dennis</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9476-280X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Jurkat-Witschas</surname><given-names>Tina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Lottermoser</surname><given-names>Annemarie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1786-9944</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Simon Unterstrasser (simon.unterstrasser@dlr.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>February</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>2319</fpage><lpage>2344</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>July</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2024</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e128">Future air traffic using (green) hydrogen (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) promises zero carbon emissions, but the effects of contrails from this new technology have hardly been investigated. We study contrail formation behind aircraft with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion by means of the particle-based Lagrangian Cloud Module (LCM) box model. Assuming the absence of soot and ultrafine volatile particle formation, contrail ice crystals form solely on atmospheric background particles mixed into the plume. While a recent study extended the original LCM with regard to the contrail formation on soot particles, we further advance the LCM to cover the contrail formation on ambient particles. For each simulation, we perform an ensemble of box model runs using the dilution along 1000 different plume trajectories.</p>

      <p id="d1e149">The formation threshold temperature of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails is around 10 K higher than for conventional contrails (which form behind aircraft with kerosene combustion). Then, contrail formation becomes primarily limited by the homogeneous freezing temperature of the water droplets such that contrails can form at temperatures down to around 234 K.</p>

      <p id="d1e161">The number of ice crystals formed varies strongly with ambient temperature even far away from the contrail formation threshold. The contrail ice crystal number clearly increases with ambient aerosol number concentration and decreases significantly for ambient particles with mean dry radii <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>⪅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 nm due to the Kelvin effect.</p>

      <p id="d1e171">Besides simulations with one aerosol particle ensemble, we analyze contrail formation scenarios with two co-existing aerosol particle ensembles with different mean dry sizes or hygroscopicity parameters. We compare them to scenarios with a single ensemble that is the average of the two aerosol ensembles. We find that the total ice crystal number can differ significantly between the two cases, in particular if nucleation-mode particles are involved.</p>

      <p id="d1e174">Due to the absence of soot particle emissions, the ice crystal number in H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails is typically reduced by more than 80 %–90 % compared to conventional contrails. The contrail optical thickness is significantly reduced, and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails either become visible later than kerosene contrails or are not visible at all for low ambient particle number concentrations. On the other hand, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails can form at lower flight altitudes where conventional contrails would not form.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding-source>
<award-id>BI 2128/1-1</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page2320?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e213">The contribution of aviation to the total anthropogenic climate forcing is estimated to be around 3.5 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.1"/>. Besides the aircraft CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, contrail cirrus makes a large contribution to the aviation radiative forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. There are several measures to mitigate the climate impact due to contrail cirrus. One mitigation option is reducing the number of formed contrail ice crystals, which strongly impact the further contrail cirrus life cycle and the radiative forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. This might be achieved by reducing soot particle number emissions, since contrail ice crystals form in particular on soot particles relative to co-emitted organic-sulfate particles for conventional passenger aircraft engines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Several ground and flight measurement campaigns have shown significant reductions in engine soot number emissions using alternative fuel blends with a lower aromatic content <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Switching from the reference Jet A-1 fuel to semisynthetic or biofuel blends, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.6"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.7"/> also find significant reductions in young-contrail ice crystal numbers by around 20 %–70 %. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.8"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.9"/> emphasize that there is a strong non-linearity between the global contrail cirrus radiative forcing and the young-contrail ice crystal number. Hence, even larger reductions in the number of ice crystals formed are desirable to obtain a substantial mitigation effect.</p>
      <p id="d1e261">Combustion of (green) hydrogen (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a promising technology to reduce the overall aviation climate impact. It provides around 3 times more energy per fuel mass than kerosene fuel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.10"/>, but it delivers much less energy by volume in typical atmospheric conditions. Hence, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is typically brought to liquid phase at 20 K and stored in special tanks of the cryoplane. During H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion, the main emission product is water vapor and its emission is roughly a factor of 2.6 larger compared to kerosene for the same amount of released combustion energy and a similar propulsion efficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.11"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Increased water vapor emissions in the stratosphere would cause significant radiative warming <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.12"/>, but this impact would be low as long as the aircraft fly at altitudes in the troposphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. While NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is still produced due to high flame temperatures, we expect neither direct CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> nor soot particle emissions during H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion. However, it was observed in laboratory studies that the emission of lubricant oil vapors can lead to the formation of ultrafine volatile particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.14"/>. In ground field measurements, lubrication oil droplets with volumetric mean dry radii ranging between around 125–175 nm were observed by sampling directly from the breather vents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.15"/>. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.16"/> performed the first field study that investigates in-flight lubrication oil emissions behind a commercial aircraft. Thereby, they find a significant contribution of lubrication oil constituents in organic particulate matter emissions from the engine exhausts that are typically associated with high soot number emissions.</p>
      <p id="d1e345">At the moment, measurements on H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails do not exist. Airbus and the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) are planning measurements behind a glider equipped with a small H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion engine within the Blue Condor campaign <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.17"/>. Moreover, Airbus aims at establishing the world's first commercial aircraft based on hydrogen propulsion by 2035 within the ZEROe project. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.18"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.19"/> estimated the radiative forcing (RF) of line-shaped contrails for a hypothetical fleet of cryoplanes in comparison with a conventional fleet within a global climate model (GCM). They found similar RF values for both types of fleets. The decrease in optical thickness for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails (RF down) was roughly balanced by the larger contrail coverage (RF up). This estimate is based on a simple parameterization of line-shaped contrails <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.20"/>, where, e.g., the contrail cover scales with the contrail formation frequency and the ice water content is simply diagnosed by the atmospheric water vapor available for deposition. Recent GCM contrail parameterizations are more advanced as they simulate the full contrail (cirrus) life cycle; treat contrails as a separate cloud class to natural clouds; and introduce contrail ice water content, coverage and ice crystal number as prognostic variables <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.21"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e391">The hot exhaust plume behind the aircraft engines continuously expands and cools due to entrainment of ambient air. Under certain atmospheric conditions and depending on specific engine and fuel parameters, the plume humidity temporally surpasses water saturation in the early jet phase and enables the formation of contrails. This condition is described by the Schmidt–Appleman (SA) criterion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.22"/>, which is based purely on the thermodynamics of the plume mixing process. If the SA criterion is fulfilled, plume particles can activate into water droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.23"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. They subsequently turn into ice crystals by homogeneous freezing if ambient temperature is below the homogeneous freezing temperature. Switching to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion with expected soot-free emissions, contrail ice crystals can still form on upper-tropospheric (UT) background particles that are entrained into the plume <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e417">Some recent box model studies and analytical approaches <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.25"/> have already included ice crystal formation on ambient particles mixed into the plume. They show that this process will become relevant if soot number emissions from conventional aircraft engines are reduced by at least 2 orders of magnitude (referred to as “soot-poor emissions”). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.26"/> estimate a decrease in the contrail ice crystal number by around 1–2 orders of magnitude when<?pagebreak page2321?> switching from conventional to soot-poor emissions at ambient temperatures at which ice crystals cannot form on ultrafine volatile particles. While those studies in general assumed fixed ambient particle properties, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.27"/> investigated contrail formation on ambient aerosol (besides soot and volatile particles) in a box model and large-eddy simulation (LES) model and varied the ambient aerosol number concentration. Finally, we expect a high uncertainty in the estimated H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrail ice crystal number due to a large variability in atmospheric particle properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, which has not been examined in sufficient detail before. Moreover, it is not clear whether ultrafine volatile particles originating from lubrication oils and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions play a role in droplet and ice crystal formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e453">The contrail formation studies mentioned in the preceding paragraph have been performed only for fuel and engine parameters that represent the kerosene case and consider the competition between ambient aerosol, soot and volatile particles. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.29"/> is the only contrail evolution study considering aircraft with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion. They performed 2D simulations of young contrails including the contrail formation process in the jet phase. They prescribe a bi-modal log-normal aerosol size distribution and vary the aerosol number concentration as the most relevant input parameter. They employ a bulk approach for the treatment of  the ice microphysics and simulate the homogeneous freezing on wetted aerosol particles. They do not use any solubility model and simply assume that the background aerosol particles are composed of ammonium sulfate.</p>
      <p id="d1e468">In the present study, we aim at providing a basic understanding of the processes regarding the contrail formation on ambient particles (“H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails”). Moreover, we will highlight the main differences compared to conventional contrails where ice crystals mainly form on soot particles. We will also explain the impact of the increased water vapor emission due to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion on the contrail formation criterion and the thermodynamic plume properties. Our main objective is to explore the variability in contrail properties (in particular ice crystal number) due to the variability in atmospheric parameters on the one hand and due to the variability in ambient aerosol particle properties on the other hand. While previous studies focused only on the variation in the aerosol number concentration, we also investigate the impact of the mean aerosol dry size and the solubility. Moreover, we will analyze the impact of the competition of two co-existing ambient aerosol particle ensembles instead of a single one on contrail ice nucleation. Finally, we will compare the number of ice crystals formed and optical thickness of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails with conventional contrails.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Background and state of the art</title>
      <p id="d1e506">This section provides a basic summary of the observed and modeled aerosol particle properties and then explains the impact of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion on the thermodynamic contrail formation criterion.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Observed and modeled aerosol particle properties</title>
      <p id="d1e525">The major source of UT aerosol particles comprises natural and anthropogenic emissions of gaseous aerosol precursors that are transported from lower altitudes by vertical updrafts like synoptic-scale lifting or deep convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.30"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> and that form particles due to chemical ion nucleation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.31"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Another important source is the in situ formation, caused by mixing processes and aircraft emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.32"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Aviation contributes about 30 %–40 % of the particle number concentration in the northern mid-latitudes' UT between 7 and 12 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.33"/>. The major relevance of ambient aerosol particles for contrails is likely over the high-density air traffic regions like central Europe, the eastern USA and North Atlantic where contrails frequently form. This relevance will increase in the near future when the first hydrogen engines become available <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.34"/>. On the other hand, future atmospheric conditions are likely to have a reduced aerosol content due to the long-term pursuit of a cleaner atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.35"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e553">Currently, there are still few observations of UT aerosol particle properties available, and here we provide a short summary of some important measurement campaigns: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.36"/> investigated spatial distributions and vertical profiles of aerosol number concentrations within two flight campaigns both over the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and over the mid-latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere (SH) in the UT. As displayed in their Table 1, the measured number concentrations in the Aitken mode range from 130 to 400 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (290 to 9600 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the SH (NH) and those in the accumulation mode from 6 to 34 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (16 to 90 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the SH (NH). In several measurement flights, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.37"/> observed aerosol particle properties over eastern Germany in summer 1998 at altitudes from ground level to 11 km within the Lindenberg Aerosol Characterization Experiment (LACE 98).  In addition to number concentrations, they derived aerosol particle size distributions at different altitudes (see their Fig. 5). In the UT and tropopause region considered, the smallest measured particle sizes (radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 nm) were the most abundant. Large data sets of aerosol particle number densities were acquired in the UT–lower stratosphere (LS) in the subtropics, the tropical tropopause and the mid-latitudes during the SCOUT-O3, SCOUT-AMMA and TROCCINOX campaigns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.38"/>. They reveal a large variability with number densities between 100 and more than 1000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the altitude range of 9 to 12 km. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.39"/> performed in situ measurements<?pagebreak page2322?> of aerosol properties as part of the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) from 2016–2018 in particular over the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. In their Fig. 12, they show vertical profiles of aerosol number concentration as well as fitted log-normal geometric diameter and geometric width of the size distribution for the nucleation-, Aitken-, accumulation- and coarse-mode particles. Additionally, cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations were measured at different water supersaturations (Fig. 14), which show a slight increase in the UT above 10 km and vary strongly with latitude. While these measurements are the most recent and comprehensive, they were mainly taken outside the main air traffic regions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.40"/> compared aerosol profiles above the North American continent and Europe to model data. They show (in their Supplement) altitude profiles of number concentrations with average values between 200 and 300 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for condensation nuclei (CN) with dry radii larger than 5 nm. Recently, long-term aerosol measurements from a commercial aircraft platform within the Civil Aircraft for the Regular Investigation of the Atmospheric Based on an Instrument Container (CARIBIC) project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.41"/> were compared with measurements over Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.42"/>. Due to massive reductions in aviation and industrial emissions during the pandemic, significant reductions in aerosol number concentrations were observed in the UT, potentially reflecting future low-emission scenarios.</p>
      <p id="d1e658">The chemical composition of aerosol particles is of great importance and impacts several microphysical processes like the hygroscopic growth and activation into water droplets. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.43"/> investigated hygroscopic properties of CCN based on their chemical composition in the North China Plain. They derived the hygroscopicity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), introduced in the solubility model from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.44"/>, of 16 relevant inorganic salts and sulfuric acid. Thereby, a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value is associated with a higher solubility of the aerosol species. Sulfuric acid and most of the inorganic salts have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In other studies, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of water-soluble organic carbon is estimated to be around 0.3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.45"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> and that of freshly emitted aviation soot is close to zero <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.46"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Pre-activated soot particles (e.g., by contrail ice in their pores) not only can be more water-soluble but also can serve as heterogeneous ice nuclei <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.47"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Composition measurements using single-particle mass spectrometry investigating the size-resolved mixing state of aerosol have gained much attention and provide the source for estimates on the hygroscopicity of background aerosol in the UT–LS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.48"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e721">Besides observation campaigns, climate models with aerosol physics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.49"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> have been developed to simulate chemical formation and microphysical processes of aerosol particles. These models have been evaluated with observations and can be used for the investigation of the global aerosol climatology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Among others, they highlight the large spatio-temporal variability in aerosol particle properties in terms of their number concentration, size distribution and chemical composition. In this work, we investigate the sensitivity to these parameters and their relevance for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrail properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Contrail formation criterion</title>
      <p id="d1e751">Behind an aircraft engine, the hot and moist plume air mixes with the colder ambient air and the plume is continuously diluted. The so-called “mixing line” describes the linear dependency between the partial vapor pressure and excess temperature in the plume. The Schmidt–Appleman (SA) criterion is fulfilled for a sufficiently low ambient temperature such that the mixing line crosses the saturation vapor pressure over liquid water and hence the plume becomes water-supersaturated in a particular time period <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.51"/>. It is a necessary condition for contrail formation and has been empirically validated by several flight campaigns for kerosene combustion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.52"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The SA threshold temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the largest ambient temperature for which water saturation is still reached in the plume <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.53"/>. It depends on the ambient relative humidity over water and the slope of the mixing line:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M39" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.622</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the specific heat capacity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the ambient pressure, EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the exhaust water vapor (mass) emission index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the specific combustion heat, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the propulsion efficiency and EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the energy-specific water vapor emission index. The calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is described in the Appendix of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.54"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e902">Fuel and engine parameters for kerosene (second column) and hydrogen propulsion (third column) and the ratio between both (last column). The water vapor mass emission index and specific combustion heat are based on Table 1 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.55"/>. The  propulsion efficiency is fixed for both fuel types to a value typical of an A340 aircraft according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.56"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.57"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fuel/engine parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kerosene</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Hydrogen</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ratio</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (kg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (MJ kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.79</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (kg MJ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.029</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.075</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1079">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows that the SA threshold temperature generally increases with rising relative humidity over water (RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the one hand and with increasing ambient pressure on the other hand. The parts of the curves lying above<?pagebreak page2323?> the solid black line depict the ice-supersaturated cases supporting persistent contrails. In the following, we compare <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for hydrogen combustion (blue lines) with those for kerosene combustion (red lines). Using the parameters from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is around 7.1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is 2.8 times higher for the hydrogen than for the kerosene case (see also Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). This leads to an overall increase in the slope of the mixing line (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) by a factor of EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 for fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ambient pressure. As a consequence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is around 10 K larger for the hydrogen than for the kerosene case (for otherwise fixed conditions). Considering the same atmospheric conditions and ensuring that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this will cause significantly higher (peak) plume water supersaturation for the hydrogen case in the early jet phase because the difference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is accordingly higher <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.58"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Moreover, droplet formation on aerosol particles will be enabled at higher ambient temperatures as we will show in the Results section.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1218">SA threshold temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus relative humidity over water (RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) for three ambient pressures (differentiated by the line style) and for the kerosene (red) and hydrogen (blue) engine parameters as they are defined in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. The solid black line displays those RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values that would result in ice saturation assuming an ambient temperature equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e1278">First, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/> gives an overview of the Lagrangian Cloud Module (LCM) and Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/> describes the employed trajectory data and plume thermodynamics. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/> explains the basic contrail formation pathway on ambient particles and the associated extension of the LCM-based box model. Finally, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/> gives an overview of the box model settings and the baseline conditions for the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion scenario.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>LCM box model</title>
      <p id="d1e1306">LCM is a particle-based microphysical model that includes aerosol, droplet and ice microphysics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.59"/>. This particle-based approach has several numerical and physical advantages over common grid-based approaches, which are typically used in computational fluid dynamics (CFD). It has been used for the simulation of natural cirrus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, young contrails <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.61"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> and aged contrail cirrus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.62"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Recently, it has been extended by contrail formation microphysics on soot particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.63"/>. Aerosol particles and hydrometeors are described by simulation particles (SIPs). Each SIP represents a certain number of aerosol particles/droplets/ice crystals with the same properties and contains information about the liquid/ice water mass, radius, phase and particle type, among other things. These properties may change due to microphysical processes like hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles and activation into water droplets, condensational droplet growth, homogeneous freezing of supercooled droplets, depositional ice crystal growth, latent heat release, aggregation of ice crystals, sedimentation and radiative effects. In this study, we will consider only those processes that are relevant for contrail formation and exclude aggregation, sedimentation and radiative effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Plume evolution</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Trajectory data</title>
      <p id="d1e1345">In a box model approach, fluid dynamics is not resolved and changes in thermodynamic properties inside the box are externally prescribed. We use the general plume dilution equations, which are described in Sect. 2.3.1 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.64"/>, to calculate the cooling and expansion of the plume as well as the evolution of the humidity. Based on 3D large-eddy simulations (LESs) using the FLUDILES solver, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.65"/> sampled an aircraft plume with 25 000 trajectories behind the engine of an A340-300 aircraft. Thereby, the temperature evolution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was tracked for each trajectory indexed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. As in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.66"/>, we use these data to infer the plume dilution factor by assuming that temperature is a passive tracer:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">580</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K are the plume exit and ambient temperatures of the FLUDILES simulation. In the remainder of the text, the subscripts “E” and “a” denote conditions at the engine exit plane and in the atmospheric background, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e1516">In the following, we describe some modifications of the FLUDILES trajectory data set compared to the original one from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.67"/>: <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1526">As in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.68"/>, we introduce a lower limit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values below this lower limit are set to this value. We choose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K such that the implied dilution and plume area are consistent with the area enclosed by the trajectories.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1597">We have smoothed the time evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each trajectory such that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes a monotonically decreasing function with increasing plume age. This means we set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> := MIN(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1715">In our current model approach, the thermodynamic plume evolution and microphysics are calculated independently for each trajectory, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.69"/> find that such an ensemble approach without considering mixing effects among nearby trajectories is not perfect, in particular when the plume is sampled with many trajectories. Hence, we reduce the number of trajectories to ntr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by merging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntr</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gr</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntr</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trajectories that are initially close to each other into a single trajectory. Thereby, we apply a mass-conserving average (that is described in more detail in the Supplement of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.70"/>) to obtain the temporal evolution of the new passive tracer temperature:</p>
      <p id="d1e1758"><disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M83" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntr</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1856">where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the weighting factor for mass-conserving averaging and the equation is exemplarily written for one of the ntr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trajectories.</p></list-item></list> We have performed sensitivity studies for different ntr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values. We find that ntr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sub</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a reasonable value which still sufficiently resolves the plume heterogeneity and will be used for the analysis in the present paper.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2324?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Plume cross-sectional area</title>
      <p id="d1e1946">The emitted air at the engine exit plane is a mixture of ambient air (going through the engine) and combustion products. The initial plume dilution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., the air-to-fuel ratio) is linked to the exit temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M90" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            This equation follows from the conservation of fuel mass and thermal energy flow. Moreover, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J (kg K)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed to be an average heat capacity for dry air over the temperature range of interest and the effects of the jet kinetic energy are neglected. The latter assumption is justified when (most) kinetic energy is converted into thermal energy well before the plume has cooled down to temperatures where supersaturation is reached and formation of droplets commences. The overall dilution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generally increases with plume age due to continuous entrainment of ambient air and is related to the dilution factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            implying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes an air-to-fuel ratio, the dilution factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is  defined as a fuel-to-air ratio (due to legacy reasons) and decreases with plume age. The word “overall” in the name of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the fact that this quantity considers the combined effect of dilution occurring in the engine and the free atmosphere. Compared to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) we drop the index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the dilution factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. With this we imply that derivations in this subsection consider the total plume and not individual plume parts represented by a single trajectory.</p>
      <p id="d1e2185">The flow of the (total) plume mass is defined as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plume</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>:=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2258">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the air density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the plume cross-sectional area (perpendicular to the axial direction) and the total exhaust velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">jet</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The latter quantity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sum of the absolute value of the aircraft speed, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and jet velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">jet</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, relative to the ambient air. The fuel flow rate (units: kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is denoted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2325?><p id="d1e2398">Applying Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) at the engine exit plane and at any other time for a fixed fuel flow rate, plugging in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>), using the ideal gas law, and assuming isobaricity, we obtain the following relation:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M111" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Note that Eq. (16) in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.71"/> shows a similar relation; however it misses the ratio of the velocities. The same holds for their Eq. (15). This term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for the fact that the plume is compressed/stretched due to the axial divergence of the jet. This clearly affects how the cross-sectional plume area changes over time. However, this divergence effect does not change the volume of the considered air parcel; it only distributes its mass over a segment with a changing extent along the axial direction. The volume of the plume changes only due to the entrainment of ambient air (reflected by the dilution factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and through associated density changes (reflected by the temperature ratio). Introducing an effective area
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M114" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) can be written as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M115" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The effective area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the cross-sectional area that is reached when the exhaust plume is (theoretically) decelerated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a volume-preserving manner. Since we provide all quantities in terms of “per meter of flight path”, the effective area is the appropriate quantity that is representative of the volume of the plume at a certain age. Note that Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) has the same form as Eq. (16) in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.72"/>. The only difference is that it uses the effective plume cross-sectional areas instead of the real physical ones. In our case, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">jet</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence, the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 1.92.</p>
      <p id="d1e2777">The fuel consumption per meter of flight path <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be computed by
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M125" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the amount of fuel that is burned per unit length along the flight direction. The amount of a corresponding combustion product per flight distance is then, e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PT</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PT</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (where EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PT</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the emission index of an assumed passive tracer). However, we have to keep in mind that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PT</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> only specifies the amount of the tracer in a segment where the jet velocity approached 0. At the engine exit plane, the total tracer amount would be lower by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2947">In the preceding paper of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.73"/>, formulas were expressed in terms of fuel consumption and never in terms of the fuel flow rate. There, the symbol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used for the fuel consumption. In the present paper, this is replaced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in order to avoid confusion with the fuel flow rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2989">Even though we made the comment that the derivations here consider the total plume, they are also valid for individual plume air parcels represented by a trajectory. The FLUDILES simulation data feature an initial plume temperature profile with a smooth radial transition between the plume and the environment instead of a step at the plume edge. Hence, trajectories in the outer plume regions start with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In principle, one could assign a trajectory-specific value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to each trajectory. The fraction of trajectories having a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value much smaller than the default is rather small. Hence, we apply a bulk-correction factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to ensemble mean values (instead of applying individual correction factors to each trajectory and then performing a suitable mass-weighted averaging/summation to trajectory ensemble data). This simplification leads only to minor quantitative deviations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3118">As written above, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.74"/> missed including the term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the computations of plume area and fuel consumption. However, the implications of this are not overly serious. The time evolution of intensive quantities in the box model is not affected by this oversight. Only in the final step of translating ice crystal number concentrations into a total number of ice crystals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per flight distance does one have to include the term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, for quantities like the apparent ice emission index (AEI) or the activation fraction, as shown in the figures of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.75"/>, the term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is canceled out and the displayed figures are all unaffected by our oversight. For the sake of clarity, we want to note that the simulations of kerosene contrails discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/> of the present study are computed with the correct formulas.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Contrail formation pathway on entrained ambient particles</title>
      <p id="d1e3184">In our study, we assume H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion with soot-free emissions. Moreover, we exclude the potential formation of ultrafine particles due to lubricant oil vapor, which will be separately discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>. Hence, contrails will solely form on ambient background particles in suitable atmospheric conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.76"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The microphysics of contrail formation on soot particles, as implemented in the LCM, has been described in detail by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.77"/>. These microphysical processes are mostly also relevant for contrail formation on ambient particles and will be summarized briefly in this section. We focus our description on additional aspects for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails and the associated extensions in the LCM-based box model. The major difference besides the chemical composition is the fact that ambient particles are continuously entrained instead of releasing a fixed number of emitted soot particles. Finally, we introduce an alternative activation criterion and an extended homogeneous freezing parameterization. This accounts for the better solubility of the majority of UT particles compared to engine soot.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Ambient aerosol particle properties</title>
      <p id="d1e3222">We prescribe background particles as an ensemble that is characterized by a log-normal size distribution with a geometric mean dry radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a geometric width (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moreover, we specify the hygroscopicity parameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.78"/>. The parameters are varied mostly independently of each other, representing different types of ambient aerosol particles and accounting for their natural variability.</p>
      <p id="d1e3264">According to the classical microphysical pathway of contrail formation with the liquid transition phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.79"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, we consider only CCN or partially soluble mixed particles (i.e., an insoluble core and a hydrophilic coating), where we assign the latter simply to “weakly soluble particles”. We exclude heterogeneous ice nucleation on insoluble particles, since measured and modeled number concentrations of ice nuclei (IN) in the UT are typically several orders of magnitudes lower than those of CCN <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.80"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Even though IN may have important effects on natural cirrus cloud properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.81"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, we expect a negligible contribution to the overall contrail ice crystal formation. Insoluble but still wettable particles like uncoated soot and oil droplets could also be treated by adsorption activation<?pagebreak page2326?> theory. This is based on standard Köhler theory but uses a specific description of the water activity that accounts for adsorption processes. In particular, the Frenkel, Halsey and Hill (FHH) adsorption approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.82"/> is able to treat multilayer adsorption of water vapor onto insoluble particles and should be considered in future studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e3285">For simplicity, we assume that the entrained ambient particles are initially completely dry, i.e., without any previous environmental hygroscopic water uptake. We allow for condensational growth of the entrained aerosol particles not only in water-supersaturated conditions but also at plume relative humidities lying between the deliquescence relative humidity (DRH) and water saturation. Thereby, DRH is the minimum threshold relative humidity that allows for hygroscopic water uptake by a given substance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Entrainment of ambient particles</title>
      <p id="d1e3296">Aerosol particles from the environment are continuously entrained into the plume. The background aerosol abundance is specified in terms of an aerosol background number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3310">As a next step, we quantify the number of aerosol particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (here per flight distance) that are present in the expanding plume.

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M150" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The ratio of densities in the first line accounts for the fact that during an adiabatic entrainment process, the mixing ratio is conserved and not the concentration. Moreover, we assume that the initial plume is void of any aerosol particles, which implies that any aerosol particle sucked into the aircraft engine is destroyed. Hence, the plume area at the engine exit is subtracted (second term in the first line). The further re-formulations assume isobaric conditions and use the ideal gas law and the definition of the effective area (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3551">If we were to also prescribe aerosol particles in the initial plume (with identical properties to those in the environment), results would not change too much as their contribution to the total aerosol particle number would become smaller and smaller while the plume expands (this case is easily treated by removing “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1” from the term “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>”).</p>
      <p id="d1e3585">The number of particles being entrained into the plume during one time step <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is then given by
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M154" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3657">In every time step, a new SIP ensemble representing these newly entrained particles is created. Only in the initial stages of the simulation when RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is still below DRH do no new SIPs have to be created as aerosol particles inside the plume are still dry. In this case, it is sufficient to only increase the SIP weight (i.e., the number denoting how many real particles are represented by a SIP).</p>
      <p id="d1e3669">Clearly, the continuous creation of new SIPs would cause huge values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lead to computationally expensive or even unfeasible simulations. Hence, we apply a SIP merging algorithm if the overall SIP number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gets too large (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3696">Moreover, we found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> happens to increase in certain (short) segments along several plume trajectories. This implies that the cross-sectional area represented by the trajectory shrinks (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a negative value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows. To inhibit such an unwanted detrainment of particles and hydrometeors, we have smoothed our trajectory data such that the dilution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a monotonically increasing function with time (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>3.3.3</label><title>Diffusional growth and freezing</title>
      <p id="d1e3787">For spherical droplets, the single-droplet mass growth equation is given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.83"/> as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M162" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wet aerosol or droplet radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the partial vapor pressure. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the specific latent heat for condensation and evaporation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the binary diffusion coefficient of air and water vapor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the conductivity of air, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the specific gas constant of vapor, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the temperature. The transitional correction factors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated according to Eqs. (A4) and (A5) of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.84"/> based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.85"/>. Note that there is a transcription error in the previous study, and the denominators of both Eq. (A4) and Eq. (A5) miss the term “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>”. With this correction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tend towards 1 for small Knudsen numbers, as intended. The quantity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the product of the saturation vapor pressure over a flat water surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the equilibrium saturation ratio over a solution droplet surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.86"/>, we calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.87"/>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M180" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where the first term is the activity of water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the exponential expression is the Kelvin term. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle dry radius, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the hygroscopicity parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> the surface tension of the solution droplet, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the mass density of water, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the molar mass of water and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the universal gas constant. The surface tension typically increases with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for salt solutions due to negative adsorption and increases with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for acidic solutions due to positive<?pagebreak page2327?> adsorption. Since we do not prescribe specific aerosol particle species but only the hygroscopicity parameter in the present study, we approximate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> with the surface tension of pure water droplets and use the polynomial expression by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.88"/> as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.89"/>. Hence, a slight error is caused in the Kelvin term for more concentrated solution droplets.</p>
      <p id="d1e4322">The entrained ambient aerosol grows by condensation if RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger than the deliquescence relative humidity (DRH). As long as the entrained particle is completely dry, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not applicable, since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, we set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to a value that is slightly lower than RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the first time step with condensation. This causes the particle to grow hygroscopically so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the next time step, and then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>). During the subsequent plume evolution, the wetted particle/droplet grows further due to condensation if RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or shrinks due to evaporation if RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>). In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.90"/>, the soot particles were considered to be activated into water droplets if the wet radius exceeded the critical radius, which is the radius at the maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the present study, we consider aerosol particles to be activated into water droplets if the activity of water has exceeded a critical value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to ensure sufficient water uptake for freezing. Once an aerosol particle has been activated into a droplet, it can freeze into an ice crystal if the plume temperature drops below the homogeneous freezing temperature of that solution droplet (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For the calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.91"/> follow the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.92"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.93"/> assuming pure water droplets. We extend this approach by including a simple correction term, based on the parameterization of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.94"/>, to account for the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the solution effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.95"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Further details are described in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4539">The depositional growth of the ice crystals formed is calculated according to Eq. (7) of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.96"/>, which is based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.97"/>. Note that there is a transcription error in that equation, where the correction term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurs twice in the mass diffusion term and should be removed in the denominator.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Model settings and baseline parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e4573">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> summarizes our baseline initial and background conditions for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion as well as the ambient particle properties and model setup parameters. We prescribe an ambient temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 225 K, ambient pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 260 hPa and relative humidity over ice RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 120 %. We define a water vapor mass emission index EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and specific combustion heat <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that are typical of hydrogen propulsion (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). We set the propulsion efficiency, engine exit temperature and initial plume area to the same values as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.98"/>. The fuel and engine parameters EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are kept constant for all sensitivity studies even though they can slightly change with ambient conditions; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/>. We determine the initial plume dilution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the fuel consumption <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>). Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the area of one engine nozzle exit plane (based on the FLUDILES data for the four-engine A340-300 aircraft and kept constant in this study), our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is representative of a single engine and would be 4 times larger for the whole aircraft. Thus, we simulate contrail formation behind a single aircraft engine. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> are given for the atmospheric baseline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower by a factor of 2.8 compared to kerosene combustion because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is accordingly higher (with the relations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). An analogous kerosene setup would have baseline values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4889">Baseline parameters for our LCM box model studies. The fuel, engine properties and exit conditions refer to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion. In addition to the entrained ambient particle properties, we provide the baseline soot particle properties for a comparison of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with conventional contrails.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fuel and</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> engine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ambient particle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Soot part.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Setup</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">conditions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">engine properties</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">exit conditions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">properties</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">properties</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">parameters</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">580</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 600 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sim</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 to 5 s</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">260</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001 s</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">out</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 s</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIP</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">110</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DRH = 0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">DRH = 0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIP</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e5500">We prescribe ambient particles with a mono-modal log-normal size distribution. We set the geometric mean dry radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to 15 nm and geometric width to 1.6, representing a typical Aitken aerosol mode in the UT <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.99"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. We define an aerosol number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 600 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which lies well between the observed values for Aitken- and accumulation-mode particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.100"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. We set the hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.5, which is, e.g., a typical value of ammonium sulfate particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.101"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.102"/> provide a large data set for DRH of different atmospheric compounds (e.g., see their Table 1). Even though many inorganic compounds have a DRH significantly below 1, we set our baseline DRH very close to water saturation. The reason for that will be discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/>. For a comparison with conventional contrails, we also provide associated soot particle properties in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5569">For any ambient particle ensemble, we use around 110 SIPs to represent its log-normal size distribution. For this, we use the algorithm described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.103"/>, which has favorable numerical convergence properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.104"/>. Each simulation contains an ensemble of box model runs for 1000 different trajectory data as described in the previous section. The runs are performed independently of each other for each trajectory. The standard simulation time is 3 s; the numerical time step is 0.001 s. For some simulations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, we extend the simulation time to 5 s, since the time period when droplet and, hence, ice crystal formation occurs is longer than 3 s. Typically, droplet and ice formation comes to a halt well before a plume age of 5 s, and hence, the ice crystal number does not increase anymore.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e5604">In this section, we first analyze the temporal evolution of thermodynamic and microphysical H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrail properties for our baseline case (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>). We then investigate the impact of atmospheric conditions on those properties in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>, we analyze the influence of ambient aerosol<?pagebreak page2328?> particle properties on contrail ice crystal formation prescribing either one or two co-existing aerosol particle ensembles. Finally, we compare our results with conventional kerosene contrails in terms of ice crystal number and optical thickness in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>. The thermodynamic and microphysical properties are either averaged or summed up over all box model trajectories obeying a mass-conserving weighting as each trajectory may represent a different share of the plume at later times. In this study, we always display our microphysical properties in units (number or mass) per flight distance.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Temporal evolution of contrail properties for the baseline case</title>
      <p id="d1e5631">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows the temporal evolution of thermodynamic and microphysical properties for our baseline case defined in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. The mean plume temperature (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a) decreases with increasing plume age due to continuous mixing of the exhaust with ambient air approaching the ambient temperature. Accordingly, the plume dilution and, therefore, the effective plume area increase, the latter from around 1.5 to 540 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after 3 s. The mean relative humidity over water RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b) surpasses the deliquescence relative humidity after around 0.2 s and reaches its maximum of around 220 % after 0.4 s. Compared to a plume behind a conventional aircraft (e.g., see Fig. 2 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.105"/>), our maximum RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and accordingly RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are substantially higher, since the difference between the ambient and the SA threshold temperature is larger (the SA threshold temperature is around 10 K higher for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than for kerosene combustion; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e5695">Temporal evolution of thermodynamic and microphysical properties in a single-engine plume for the baseline case: the panels show the <bold>(a)</bold> temperature (black) and effective cross-sectional area (red and labels on the right axis), <bold>(b)</bold> relative humidity over water (dashed) and ice (solid), <bold>(c)</bold> number of aerosol particles entrained into the plume (dash-dotted) and number of droplets (dashed) and ice crystals (solid) per flight distance, and <bold>(d)</bold> liquid (dashed black) and ice water mass per flight distance (solid black) and mean radius of the ice crystals (red and labels on the right axis).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5716">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c shows the accumulated number of aerosol particles entrained into the plume (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the number of formed droplets (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">drp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the number of ice crystals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases nearly linearly with time, reaching values of around 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after 1.5 and 3 s, respectively. This is different to exhaust species like soot particles, since they typically form right behind the engine exit (when plume relative humidity is still low and no activation occurs) and their emitted number (per flight distance) is then assumed to be constant over time.</p>
      <p id="d1e5811">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are mainly controlled by the ambient aerosol number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the plume area expansion.  The first aerosol particles activate into water droplets (dashed line) after RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> surpasses the DRH in the corresponding trajectories. A few tenths of a second later, they freeze into ice crystals (solid line) once plume temperature falls below the homogeneous freezing temperature of those droplets. Later on (at plume ages between around 0.6–1.1 s), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is very close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This means that basically all entrained aerosol particles nearly instantaneously form droplets and freeze. After 1.5 s when the mean RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> falls below approximately 95 %, no further droplets and ice crystals form. Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stays constant afterwards at 1.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Some of the droplets (small peak in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">drp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at around 1.4 s) cannot freeze, and they evaporate afterwards. This is because the homogeneous freezing temperature of those droplets, which either are too small or have water activity that is too low, is not reached. The ice crystals grow by deposition so that the ice water mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) continuously increases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d). The mean ice crystal radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red line) tends to increase over time and finally reaches a size of around 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0.6 and 1.3 s is because more and more of the smaller droplets manage to freeze into ice crystals and, hence, the mean ice crystal size drops in that time period. Since the plume is still ice-supersaturated (solid line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b) after 3 s, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would increase even further.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Impact of atmospheric properties</title>
      <p id="d1e6013">Here, we investigate in detail the impact of ambient temperature on the plume thermodynamical and microphysical contrail properties. Moreover, we analyze the influence of ambient pressure and relative humidity over ice. We prescribe our baseline ambient aerosol particle properties and keep them constant in this section. Note that a fixed aerosol number concentration for varying atmospheric parameters (in particular pressure) is an idealized assumption in the following sensitivity studies.</p>
<?pagebreak page2329?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Influence of ambient temperature on temporal evolution of thermodynamic and contrail properties</title>
      <p id="d1e6023">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> highlights the strong impact of ambient temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on contrail ice crystal formation. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a, the plume temperature at a given plume age is certainly lower in a colder environment and finally approaches the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. The peak mean relative humidity over water (displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b) increases with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (reaching values of around 350 % and 550 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 220 and 215 K, respectively). The large increase for low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values is due to the non-linearity between saturation vapor pressure and temperature. The relative humidity over ice behaves accordingly (not shown).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e6090">Impact of ambient temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the temporal evolution of thermodynamic and microphysical properties in a single-engine plume: the panels show the <bold>(a)</bold> temperature, <bold>(b)</bold> relative humidity over ice, <bold>(c)</bold> number of aerosol particles entrained into the plume (dash-dotted) and number of droplets (dashed) and ice crystals (solid) per flight distance, and <bold>(d)</bold> ice water mass per flight distance. The colors represent the different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as defined in the legend.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e6134">The slight change in the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a consequence of our model setup with a fixed aerosol number concentration and the varying plume air density with temperature (at fixed ambient pressure). In general, the droplet formation is basically controlled by the time period where RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is above DRH such that water can condense on the entrained aerosol particles. (Note that the evolution in RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and, therefore, this time period vary with each trajectory, and here we only display the ensemble mean quantity.) This mean time period for possible droplet and ice crystal formation substantially increases with decreasing ambient temperature (e.g., from 0.15 s up to 2.8 s for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 215 K). This means that ice crystal formation is initiated earlier and comes to a halt later (see solid red and blue lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c) compared to the baseline case. Moreover, nearly all formed droplets freeze very quickly into ice crystals so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">drp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches zero. For these reasons, the final ice crystal number strongly increases with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the whole temperature range (see also Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). This is different to what we find for conventional soot contrails as all soot particles turn into ice crystals if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is several kelvins below the SA threshold temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.106"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Yet, any further reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not lead to more ice crystals in the conventional case. Moreover, the peak plume RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are substantially higher for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than for kerosene combustion in the same ambient conditions. Therefore, droplet and ice crystal formation on ambient particles is controlled more strongly by the time period in which the plume is water-supersaturated than by the maximum water supersaturation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e6255">Final ice crystal number per flight distance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in a single-engine plume versus ambient temperature for <bold>(a)</bold> three different ambient pressures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> three different ambient relative humidities over ice (RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The black line in both panels always refers to the baseline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given at a plume age of 3 s for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 215 K and at a plume age of 5 s for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 210 K.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e6379">For higher ambient temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 K), many droplets cannot freeze into ice crystals and evaporate thereafter (which is indicated by declining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">drp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at nearly constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This is because the homogeneous freezing temperature of the smaller and/or more concentrated solution droplets is below the plume/ambient temperature. Hence, the final ice crystal numbers are decreased further in addition to the fact<?pagebreak page2330?> that the time period for possible droplet formation is lower. The decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes stronger for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 232 K (see also Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 233 K, only a few large droplets can form ice crystals. For higher ambient temperatures no ice crystal formation occurs anymore. This means that for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion, the freezing temperature is typically smaller than the SA threshold temperature and becomes a more limiting criterion for contrail formation. Yet, the SA threshold temperature is still relevant, as its difference from the ambient temperature determines the peak and time period of water supersaturation in the plume. The ice water mass (shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d) in general increases with decreasing ambient temperature. The strong increase between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 230  and 233 K is mainly due to the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6502">In the following sections, we will focus our analysis on the final number of ice crystals formed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), since the young-contrail ice number mostly impacts the further contrail (cirrus) properties and radiative forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.107"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In contrast, the initial ice water mass and mean ice crystal radius<?pagebreak page2331?> were shown to have a low impact on the contrail life cycle in the dispersion phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.108"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, but the size distribution of the contrail ice crystals formed can strongly impact the sublimation loss of ice crystals during the vortex phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.109"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The latter will be investigated in future studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>Final ice crystal number</title>
      <p id="d1e6544">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> displays <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus ambient temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for (a) three different pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and (b) three different values of ambient relative humidity over ice RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that our parameter settings are simplified in the sense that some combinations of parameter values are not realistic for the atmosphere (e.g., the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value at the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value). Compared to the previous subsection, we now include a further case with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 210 K (that requires a longer simulation time, since the period when the plume is water-supersaturated is longer than 3 s). This case emphasizes the enhanced increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for very cold conditions and is consistent with the findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.110"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is increased for a higher ambient pressure because the slope of the mixing line <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), is larger for a higher pressure. Moreover, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b shows an incline of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both the increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the higher RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> lead to higher peak plume relative humidities and enlarge the time period for possible droplet and subsequent ice crystal formation. Interestingly, this increase is quite strongly pronounced for the highly ice-supersaturated case (red line) at ambient temperatures between 230 and 234 K (and for 234 K ice crystals can only form at all for this case). This is because the droplet freezing is mainly limited by the droplet size in that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range, and for the high-RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case, more larger droplets can form that turn into ice crystals.</p>
      <p id="d1e6772">Finally, ambient temperature is the parameter that most influences the number of contrail ice crystals formed, while the impact of ambient pressure and relative humidity is clearly smaller. This behavior is similar to the conventional case with kerosene combustion despite the very different temporal evolution in the exhaust particle number concentration.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Sensitivity of ice crystal number to ambient aerosol particle properties</title>
      <p id="d1e6784">In this section, we investigate the impact of ambient aerosol particle properties on the (final) number of ice crystals formed in H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails. We prescribe one aerosol particle ensemble (single mode) in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1"/> (as in the previous analysis) and two co-existing aerosol particle ensembles in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>4.3.1</label><title>Studies with a single-aerosol particle ensemble</title>
      <p id="d1e6807">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with different aerosol particle properties. The sensitivities are always shown for three ambient temperatures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (differentiated by the color). In general, we see an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for any particle property combination, being consistent with the findings in the previous section. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with increasing aerosol number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This increase becomes weaker for higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">⪆</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) values. This is due to the enhanced competition for plume water vapor between the growing droplets/ice crystals for increased aerosol number concentrations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e6928">Final ice crystal number per flight distance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in a single-engine plume depending on different aerosol particle properties assuming uni-modal size distributions for three ambient temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (different colors defined in legend <bold>a</bold>): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown versus the <bold>(a)</bold> ambient aerosol number concentration, <bold>(b)</bold> geometric mean dry radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for three solubility values (see line style in legend <bold>b</bold>), <bold>(c)</bold> hygroscopicity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (see line style in legend <bold>c</bold>) and <bold>(d)</bold> the geometric width of the size distribution for four different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> combinations as displayed in the legend.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e7059">Next, we analyze the importance of the mean dry radius of the aerosol size distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Typically, the ice crystal number strongly increases with increasing mean dry size for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⪅</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 nm and then stays nearly constant (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b). The increase is mainly due to the Kelvin effect; i.e., larger aerosol particles are easier to activate into water droplets, since they require lower plume water supersaturations and grow more quickly into water droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.111"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e7107">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c shows the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slightly increases for a larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as indicated in the legend. For the lower-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases, the variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is more complex. For the small-sized particles (dash-dotted lines), there are two counteracting effects: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with a rising hygroscopicity parameter for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, since more soluble particles can more easily form water droplets. On the other hand, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> subsequently decreases. This is because some of the droplets cannot freeze into ice crystals, since their water activity is lower due to the enhanced solution effect for higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and, therefore, the homogeneous freezing temperature is significantly decreased (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F10"/> in the Appendix). For the other <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hardly changes with the solubility and mean aerosol particle size.</p>
      <p id="d1e7321">We also analyze in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d the impact of the geometric width of the aerosol size distribution for four different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> combinations as displayed in the legend. Our results imply a very low sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the geometric width.</p>
      <p id="d1e7363">In conclusion, the sensitivity of the ice crystal number to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is low for aerosol particles with a large mean dry size. For the small-sized particles, we find a quite complex variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, mainly for low ambient temperatures, due to various counteracting effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>4.3.2</label><title>Studies with two co-existing aerosol particle ensembles</title>
      <p id="d1e7418">So far, the aerosol particles have been prescribed with a single log-normal size distribution and a fixed hygroscopicity value. In the present section, we prescribe two co-existing ambient aerosol particle ensembles and analyze contrail ice crystal formation for two ambient temperatures. The given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is the total number concentration of both aerosol<?pagebreak page2332?> ensembles. We restrict our analysis to cases where each ensemble has a number concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We consider nucleation-mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 nm), Aitken-mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 nm as in our baseline case) and accumulation-mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 nm) particles. The given mean dry sizes of the single modes are prescribed consistently with typical observed UT geometric mean diameters over the Atlantic and Pacific oceans within the ATom campaign (see Fig. 12 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="altparen.112"/>). Moreover, we consider well-soluble (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5) particles like inorganic salts and weakly soluble ambient particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) like organic species or aviation soot. We restrict our analysis to a scenario where the two co-existing particle ensembles always differ in either their mode (in our case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or the solubility <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, we compare the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the two aerosol particle ensembles with a reference case, which uses a single aerosol population with the same value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the two particle ensembles.</p>
      <p id="d1e7584">The first two rows of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> show the temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 600 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. First, we analyze the contrail ice number evolution for bi-modal aerosol size distributions with the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value (first row). Panel (a) shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Aitken-mode particle is at the end around 50 % larger than that for the nucleation-mode particle for both temperatures. This is because, for a given plume relative humidity, the larger particles can better activate into water droplets (and freeze thereafter) than the very small nucleation-mode particles due to the Kelvin effect. Moreover, the total ice crystal number is at the end around 10  % lower than the reference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Considering the Aitken and accumulation mode in panel (b), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two particle ensembles is quite similar and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K nearly identical. This is consistent with the findings for a single particle ensemble where the variation in the ice crystal number for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⪆</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 nm is low (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b). For the same reason, the total and reference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are close to each other.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e7711">Ice crystal number per flight distance for two co-existing ambient aerosol particle ensembles: all results are shown for two ambient temperatures (225 K solid and 230 K dashed). The first two rows show the temporal evolution of ice crystal number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the last two rows the final ice crystal number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (at a plume age of 3 s) versus the total ambient aerosol number concentration of both ensembles. The blue and red lines depict the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the single-aerosol ensembles and the black lines the sum of both co-existing ensembles. The magenta lines represent reference cases from simulated single-aerosol particle ensembles prescribing average quantities of the two co-existing ensembles. Panels <bold>(a, e)</bold> and <bold>(b, f)</bold> show results for a bi-modal aerosol size distribution (with mean dry radii <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as displayed in the legends) for a fixed hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5. The other panels show results for two aerosol particle ensembles with a different solubility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 and 0.5) but a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, namely 15 nm in panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(g)</bold> and 3 nm in panels <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(h)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e7827">Now, we investigate the ice crystal formation for particle ensembles with two different solubility characteristics but the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second row). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the weakly soluble particles is lower than for the well-soluble particles. This is because the less hygroscopic particles are harder to activate and/or cannot grow to sufficiently large droplet sizes in order to freeze into ice crystals. Hence, the total ice crystal numbers are slightly reduced (by around 5 %–10 %) relative to the reference ice numbers. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 225 K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is at the end lower for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the total ice number is lower than the reference ice number, contrary to the high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases. This is due to the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for droplets with a higher solution effect (lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1"/> and shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2334?><p id="d1e7955">The last two rows show the final ice crystal numbers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the same aerosol particle ensembles as in panels (a)–(d) but for different aerosol number concentrations. Basically, we see a similar trend for the ice crystal numbers of the single ensembles and the reference case to that in the panels above throughout the whole <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range. In general, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes weaker for higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in particular for the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases. This is consistent with the findings for a single-aerosol ensemble (as already shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a). The flattening in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is pronounced most strongly for the nucleation mode and the weakly hygroscopic particles. Again, the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the two particle ensembles is nearly always reduced compared to the reference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the single average particle ensemble except for the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases in panel (g) and (h).</p>
      <p id="d1e8096">Finally, we find the largest differences between the total ice crystal number of the co-existing particle ensembles and the associated average single particle ensemble for the cases where nucleation-mode particles are involved. This is mainly due to the non-linearity between the (final) contrail ice crystal number and mean dry size for those very small aerosol particles.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison of H${}_{{2}}$ contrails with conventional contrails}?><title>Comparison of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails with conventional contrails</title>
      <p id="d1e8119">In the present section, we study differences in microphysical and optical properties of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails compared to conventional contrails formed behind aircraft with kerosene combustion. For the latter, we include in our setup ice crystal formation both on soot and on the entrained ambient particles. We analyze in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4.SSS1"/> the number of formed contrail ice crystals as a first step to estimating the mitigation potential of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4.SSS2"/>, we analyze the optical thickness, which can provide information about the visibility of young contrails. While first measurements like Blue Condor could use this information for their planning, they potentially also provide a first chance to evaluate our model. We use the respective engine and fuel parameters defined in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. We define the properties of ambient and soot particles according to Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e8151"><bold>(a)</bold> Final ice crystal number of a conventional (kerosene) contrail versus ambient temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for three soot particle emission numbers per flight distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (different line styles). The other panels show the final ice crystal number of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails relative to the final ice crystal number of kerosene contrails in the same atmospheric conditions. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus ambient aerosol number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the different soot number emissions and three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases (see legend <bold>b</bold>). Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the temperature variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of one H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrail (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 600 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to three kerosene contrails with different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as in panel <bold>(b)</bold>. Panel <bold>(d)</bold> shows the temperature variation in three H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails (with different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as displayed in the legend) with respect to one kerosene contrail (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Thereby, the solid black lines in panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> represent the same case. The different line styles always refer to the three soot emission cases. The displayed quantities are given at a plume age of 3 s. All absolute numbers refer to a single-engine plume.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>4.4.1</label><title>Mitigation potential</title>
      <p id="d1e8393">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> compares ice crystal numbers of conventional and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails. Panel (a) displays the ice crystal number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> behind a conventional aircraft as a function of ambient temperature and for three typical soot number emission levels. For our calculated fuel consumption (that accounts for the different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and kerosene), the displayed soot particle numbers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 3.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 6.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) represent soot number emission indices of around 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Prescribing our baseline ambient pressure and ambient relative humidity, the SA threshold temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for kerosene is around 227 K (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 K lower than that for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Very close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, only a few soot and the entrained ambient aerosol particles can form ice crystals due to very low plume water supersaturations. For ambient temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⪅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – 0.5 K), ice crystals mainly form on soot particles, since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is around 2 orders of magnitude higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the contrail formation time (not shown). Consistently with previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.113"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> strongly increases with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then approaches the respective <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for sufficiently low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the number of ice crystals formed rises more steeply and approaches <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2335?><p id="d1e8742"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Now we investigate the ratio of the ice crystal numbers between H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and kerosene contrails (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) shown in panels (b)–(d). We constrain our analysis to that temperature range in which kerosene contrails are able to form according to the SA criterion. Mitigation is achieved for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where a lower value is connected with a higher mitigation potential. Panel (b) shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (see line style) and for three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases (different colors). In general, we see a clear decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thereby, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is below 0.1 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 600 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and below 0.15 for higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Interestingly, we see for the higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases a larger difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 220 and 222 K than between 220 and 225 K.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2336?><p id="d1e8996">Therefore, we investigate in more detail the temperature dependency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the second row of the figure. Panel (c) shows the relative change in the ice crystal number with respect to the three soot cases for our baseline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In connection with the minimum at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 224 K, there are two different dominating effects: below 224 K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in particular for the high-soot case. This is because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the kerosene contrails approaches <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (well below the SA threshold), while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails increases further for lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The latter is because the ambient aerosol is continuously entrained into the plume and the time period for droplet and ice crystal formation increases for colder ambient conditions due to a longer-lasting water supersaturation (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>). The strong increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above around 225 K results from the strong decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the conventional contrail. This is because ice crystal formation on the weakly soluble soot particles becomes more and more limited the closer the ambient temperature approaches the SA threshold temperature. Thereby, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is around 0.3 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 226.5 K and around 20 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 227 K (the latter is not visible in the figure). Finally, we show the change in ice crystal number relative to our baseline soot case but for three different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is quite similar to that to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in panel (c). The most obvious difference is that an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by a factor of 2 (brown line in d) has a much lower impact on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the same factor (dashed line in panel c). This is due to a weaker increase in the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrail ice crystal number with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for high number concentrations (shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a).</p>
      <p id="d1e9354">We can conclude that a switch to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion indicates a high mitigation potential if the ambient temperature is more than 0.5 K lower than the SA threshold temperature for kerosene. This is mainly because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during contrail formation is around 2 orders of magnitude lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for typical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Another aspect is that the fuel consumption of a cryoplane is chosen to be around a factor of 2.8 lower than that of a corresponding conventional aircraft (only based on the difference in the combustion heat of the fuels). If air traffic with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion occurs at ambient temperatures between the kerosene SA threshold temperature and the droplet freezing temperature, clearly additional contrails are produced, which would be absent in the case of kerosene combustion.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>4.4.2</label><title>Contrail visibility</title>
      <p id="d1e9417">We investigate the young-contrail optical thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) both for kerosene and for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion. For the quantities analyzed and presented so far, we used a reduced trajectory data set after merging trajectories with similar radial coordinates (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>). However, the column-wise computation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> requires spatial information of the trajectories, namely the lateral and vertical Cartesian coordinates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence, the results presented next were obtained using the full trajectory data set from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.114"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a–d show the contrail width (indicated by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coordinate) plume age (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: the first row displays the kerosene and the second row our H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> baseline case, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of both 220 K and 225 K, respectively. Observations suggest that the threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the visibility of contrails is around 0.05 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.115"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Panel (a) indicates that the kerosene contrail at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 220 K becomes visible after around 0.25 s of plume age. Afterwards, the plume quickly spreads and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> tends to increase due to further formation and growth of ice crystals. Peak values of around 2 and slightly higher are reached for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 1 and 1.5 s. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 225 K, ice crystals form later and the contrail is visible after around 0.5 s. Maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is around 50 % lower than for the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> case, since that contrail forms near the formation threshold and the nucleated ice crystal number is significantly reduced (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, black line). For the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case, the optical thickness is substantially decreased compared to kerosene contrails, being consistent with the findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.116"/>. Moreover, these contrails become visible later than those for kerosene at the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e9606">Contour plots <bold>(a–d)</bold> of young single-engine contrail optical thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over the trajectories' <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coordinate indicating the contrail width and the plume age. The first row show results for kerosene (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the second for the baseline H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> case, for ambient temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of both 220 K on the left-hand side and 225 K on the right-hand side. Panel <bold>(e)</bold> shows the 90th-percentile optical thickness over the width <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for kerosene (red) and for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> prescribing three different ambient aerosol number concentrations (other colors in the legend) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 220 K (dashed lines) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 225 K (solid lines). The temporal evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been smoothed using a running-average method. For this analysis, we use the full FLUDILES trajectory ensemble of 25 000 instead of the reduced ensemble of 1000.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e9755">Finally, panel (e) shows the temporal evolution of the 90th-percentile optical thickness over the contrail width <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We juxtapose the kerosene contrail with three H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails with different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Consistent with the spatio-temporal distributions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails is significantly lower than for the kerosene contrails (in particular for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 220 K). The optical thickness decreases for lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. We expect that the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrail for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> would be hardly visible. A lower temperature causes a slight increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the higher-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 s. This is mainly due to the higher ice water content for lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (not shown). Instead, the much stronger increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the kerosene case is due to the increased ice crystal number already at the beginning of contrail formation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Potential sources for the formation of ultrafine volatile particles</title>
      <p id="d1e9941">In this study, we considered contrail ice crystals to form solely on ambient particles entrained in the plume. While H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion emissions are in general expected to be soot-free, the formation of ultrafine volatile particles (UFPs), which can also contribute to contrail ice crystal formation, is still possible. Two potential sources for the formation of UFPs behind H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion engines are discussed in the following.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>5.1.1</label><title>Nitrogen compounds</title>
      <p id="d1e9969">Several recent studies have considered chemi-ions that are mainly composed of sulfur species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.117"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. While sulfur is likely not produced during H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is still emitted. The reaction of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and OH species potentially leads to the formation of nitrogen compounds like nitric acid that have been observed in conventional aircraft plumes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.118"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Moreover, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.119"/> have shown within cloud chamber experiments that nitric acid and ammonia can nucleate directly to form volatile ammonium nitrate particles at temperatures below 258 K. Finally, nitrogen species might be a potential source of the nucleation of ultrafine volatile particles in both conventional and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combustion plumes, but the formation process behind this is not yet sufficiently understood.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>5.1.2</label><title>Ultrafine oil particles</title>
      <p id="d1e10039">We expect that engine lubrication systems will continue to be used for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> engines, causing emissions of oil vapors. Even though an air–oil separator recovers around 99 % of the oil emissions, the residual may contaminate the engine plume. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.120"/> have shown in laboratory experiments that “jet oil vapors reach gas-phase supersaturation in cooling emission plumes leading to rapid nucleation and formation of ultrafine volatile particles  in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–20 nm.” These diameter ranges appear to be consistent with the ground-measured ambient UFPs downwind of Frankfurt Airport, in which organic engine oil constituents have been identified <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.121"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2338?><p id="d1e10064">The UFPs formed can contribute to droplet and ice crystal formation in addition to the background aerosol. Assuming a typical oil consumption of around 1 L h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with 1 % volume fraction (residual) that enters the plume, our estimates suggest that the UFP number per flight distance could be even larger than that of soot particles. Since plume water supersaturations are much higher for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than for kerosene in the same ambient conditions, we expect that droplets and ice crystals would mainly form on those UFPs rather than on the entrained ambient particles. This means that the number of ice crystals could be similar or even increased compared to conventional contrails. One should still keep in mind that the experiments of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.122"/> refer to conventional kerosene combustion and that the properties of the oil particles (size and chemical composition) could significantly change for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, associate measurements in cruise altitude conditions are necessary to confirm the occurrence of those UFPs.</p>
      <p id="d1e10100">Finally, a hermetic and clean sealing of the engines from the oil system aimed at a complete jet oil recovery could be a technical means to achieve a valuable mitigation effort for contrail formation if future model studies and flight campaigns give indications of abundant droplet formation on oil particles.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Scaling relations for different plume area evolution and fuel consumption levels</title>
      <p id="d1e10112">In the present study, we use the FLUDILES trajectory data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.123"/> that were modified according to the description in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>. The presented results represent a single-engine plume of an A340 aircraft. Extensive contrail quantities (like ice crystal number and mass) for the whole aircraft may be scaled with the number of engines (in our case, it is four). This scaling is valid as long as we assume that there is no interference from the two exhaust plumes (on one side of the aircraft) during the contrail formation stage. This scaling could also be interpreted as a scaling with the ratio of the total fuel consumption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and our reference value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (for the baseline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values). Basically, one could plug in any reasonable value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, this flexible fuel consumption scaling approach is only valid with several underlying assumptions that are usually not fulfilled. Firstly, one has to assume that the initial plume area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scales with the fuel consumption and, secondly, that the plume dilution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e10265">However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.124"/> showed that the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> itself depends on engine size. Different dilution impacts not only the plume area evolution but also the thermodynamic plume and the microphysical contrail properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.125"/>. Neglecting those constraints and assuming fixed atmospheric conditions and aerosol particle properties, we observe that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This behavior is similar to that of kerosene contrails, where we find  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Again, this is only a rough estimate with several underlying assumptions and for a fixed soot number emission index of EI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2339?><p id="d1e10389"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>So far, we have stressed that the given reference value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> holds (only) for the baseline values of ambient temperature and pressure. In our study, we use a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which refers to a particular aircraft type with an engine nozzle radius of 0.5 m (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). Moreover, we keep the plume exit temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixed in our setup.</p>
      <p id="d1e10428">From Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>), it follows that the initial dilution and, correspondingly, the fuel consumption implicitly change when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> takes a different value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much less crucial for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than the impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the plume relative humidity evolution. A change in ambient pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes linearly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence, the implied <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity study differ non-negligibly. Clearly, these changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are consequences of our choices in the study design. In reality, the fuel consumption depends on the thrust setting and may change differently to how we prescribed it when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.126"><named-content content-type="pre">see, e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Deliquescence relative humidity</title>
      <p id="d1e10647">We prescribe a fixed deliquescence relative humidity of the aerosol particles, DRH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in our setup, a value close to water saturation. The definition of a lower baseline value (according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="altparen.127"/>) with appropriate sensitivity variations would have been more reasonable. However, in several test simulations we did not achieve robust results for DRH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⪅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in particular for the low mean aerosol particle dry size and hygroscopicity parameter. This is likely due to one technical aspect: while water saturation is reached first near the plume edge and later on in the plume center in the first tenths of a second, higher relative humidities last longer in the plume center than at the edge towards the end of contrail formation (see, e.g., Fig. 1d of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.128"/>). The lower the DRH value, the longer the potential time period for droplet and subsequent ice crystal formation, in particular for lower ambient temperatures. The ambient particles are mainly entrained near the plume edge. Since we cannot resolve this heterogeneous entrainment but ambient particles are mixed in for each trajectory with equal share, droplet and ice crystal formation is likely overestimated, and this overestimation increases with decreasing DRH.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions and outlook</title>
      <p id="d1e10685">In the recent past, several model studies have investigated contrail formation behind commercial aircraft by means of analytical approaches <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.129"/>, 0D box models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.130"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> and LES <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.131"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. These studies focused on contrail formation on soot particles on which the majority of ice crystals form for conventional engines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.132"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Switching to liquid hydrogen (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) propulsion, ice crystals are expected to form solely on background particles mixed into the plume. Even though some of those studies account for ice crystal formation on background particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.133"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, the implementation of this process has been somewhat simplified (e.g., activation relaxation approach in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.134"/>) and ambient particle properties are mostly kept fixed.</p>
      <p id="d1e10724">While <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.135"/> have extended the particle-based Lagrangian Cloud Module (LCM; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="altparen.136"/>) by contrail formation microphysics on soot particles, we here advance the LCM by specific contrail formation microphysics on entrained background aerosol particles. The most relevant feature is that ambient particles are continuously entrained into the plume instead of releasing a fixed number of soot particles.  Moreover, we define an alternative droplet activation criterion and improve the homogeneous freezing parameterization by accounting for the impact of the solution effect on droplet freezing.</p>
      <p id="d1e10733">Given the same atmospheric conditions and propulsion efficiency, the Schmidt–Appleman (SA) threshold temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.137"/> is around 10 K higher for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than for kerosene-fueled aircraft due to water vapor emissions that are around 2.6 times higher for the same amount of released combustion heat. The homogeneous freezing temperature of water droplets is in general lower than the SA threshold temperature for H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails and, therefore, becomes a more limiting criterion for contrail formation, as already pointed out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.138"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e10760">The ice crystal number is strongly cut down for temperatures above around 230 K since smaller droplets no longer freeze into ice crystals. Contrails cannot form anymore at temperatures above around 233–234 K in our study. While for kerosene combustion the number of ice crystals formed approaches the emitted soot particle number for a sufficiently low ambient temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.139"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, the ice crystal number of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails increases further with decreasing temperature. The latter is because the water supersaturation in the plume lasts longer for colder conditions, and, hence, more of the entrained aerosol particles can form droplets and ice crystals.</p>
      <p id="d1e10778">Our results highlight a large variability in the number of contrail ice crystals formed with varying ambient aerosol properties. For a fixed particle size distribution and chemical composition, the ice crystal number clearly rises with increasing aerosol number concentration. This increase becomes weaker for higher number concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">⪆</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), in particular in a colder environment. The variation in contrail ice nucleation with aerosol mean dry size and water solubility is low for larger aerosol particles and high for small (mean radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mo>⪅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 nm) particles. For these smaller particles, the sensitivity of the ice crystal number to the water solubility of the aerosol particles is quite complex for lower temperatures due to various counteracting microphysical processes.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2340?><p id="d1e10807"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In the real atmosphere, the background aerosol typically consists of multiple particle types with different mean dry sizes (modes) and chemical composition. Therefore, we analyze contrail formation prescribing two co-existing aerosol particle ensembles that differ in either the mean dry size or hygroscopicity parameter. If these co-existing particle ensembles contain only larger (mean dry radii more than around 10 nm) and well-soluble aerosol particles, the ice crystal number for each of the ensembles can be estimated well from a simulation with appropriate single particle ensembles. The total ice crystal number of the co-existing particle ensembles can also be approximated from one single particle ensemble prescribing average properties of mean dry size and solubility and the total number concentration of the co-existing particle ensembles. This is because the ice crystal number is not as sensitive to changes in this large particle range, as mentioned above. Conversely, such an approach is not meaningful if a substantial fraction of small and weakly soluble aerosol particles (in particular nucleation-mode particles) are present. If these particles co-exist with larger and/or more soluble particles, droplet and ice crystal formation on these particles might be significantly suppressed due to the competition effects between the aerosol particles. Due to the non-linearity between ice crystal number and mean dry size for small particles, the total ice crystal number of the co-existing particle ensembles might be significantly different to the average single particle ensemble.</p>
      <p id="d1e10811">Finally, we compare ice crystal formation, as a first measure of mitigation potential, and visibility of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails with conventional contrails. Varying both the aerosol number concentration and soot number emissions, the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrail ice crystal number is significantly reduced (by more than 80 %–90 %) compared to conventional contrails, implying a great mitigation potential. This is mainly because ambient aerosol number concentrations are at least 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than soot particle number concentrations in young exhaust plumes behind conventional aircraft. For ambient temperatures only slightly below (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">⪅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 K) the SA threshold temperature for kerosene combustion, the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrail ice crystal number can be higher, since ice crystal formation on the weakly soluble soot particles becomes strongly limited by very low plume water supersaturations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.140"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The optical thickness is significantly decreased, and the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails either become visible slightly later or might not be visible at all for low ambient aerosol number concentrations. On the other hand, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contrails can form at lower flight altitudes (connected with ambient temperatures lying between the SA threshold temperature for kerosene and the homogeneous freezing temperature of the water droplets) than conventional contrails, as also mentioned by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.141"/>. In the case of persistent contrails, this would increase the contrail coverage and counteract the climate benefits of low-ice-number contrails.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Numerical convergence and SIP merging</title>
      <p id="d1e10887">Once RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> surpasses DRH for the first time, a new SIP ensemble that represents the newly entrained dry aerosol is created at every time step. In order to keep the total SIP number in an acceptable range, we employ a SIP merging technique whereby several similarly sized SIPs of the same category (aerosol, droplets and ice crystals) are merged into a single SIP. The merge operation is implemented such that the number and mass of the represented physical particles are conserved <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.142"/>. The SIP merging is executed when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeds a certain threshold value (fixed to 1600 in our study). Then the new <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is well below that threshold and starts to increase again. In the end, the SIP number follows a jigsaw pattern as exemplarily shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F9"/>. The merge operation has some more (internal) parameters, e.g., how many SIPs are at most merged and what is the maximum relative difference between SIPs that are merged. We experimented with those parameters and found numerical convergence, which means our present configuration yields basically identical results to simulations with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e10940">Temporal evolution of the number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SIP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of simulation particles (SIPs) for a contrail forming on ambient particles using one average FLUDILES trajectory in baseline conditions (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{B}?><label>Appendix B</label><title>Parameterization of homogeneous freezing temperature</title>
      <p id="d1e10970">We calculate the homogeneous freezing temperature as
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>B1</label><mml:math id="M665" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the freezing temperature assuming a pure supercooled water droplet (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). It is determined from Eq. (6) of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.143"/> following the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.144"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.145"/> and varies with droplet water volume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and cooling rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2341?><p id="d1e11092">The second term is a correction term based on the study from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.146"/> approximating the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing activity of water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.147"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.148"/> developed an approximation for the homogeneous freezing temperature of solution droplets (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">owood</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of water volume and activity but neglected the cooling rate. Thereby, that temperature for which the mean number of critical embryos becomes equal to 1 is iteratively calculated, triggering the freezing process in the droplet (see their Eq. 1). For our activated water droplets (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we find that the parameterization yields robust results for droplet radii <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. On the other hand, the solution effect is frequently important for smaller droplets (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) formed on freshly entrained aerosol particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e11204">For simplicity, we prescribe a fixed droplet radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m for the estimation of our correction term. We evaluate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">owood</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values that result from a variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Setting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">owood</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">owood</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we define the following quadratic fit function,
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>B2</label><mml:math id="M685" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        which is valid for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the fit parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">345.746</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100.977</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01687</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a square root mean error <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99999</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Even though the expression for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a simplified correction term, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.E15"/>) combines the sensitivity of the homogeneous freezing to all major effects.</p>
      <p id="d1e11471">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F10"/> shows the variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with droplet radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and water activity for a plume cooling rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 K s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 (representing pure water droplets), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ranges between around 229 and 233 K. Thereby, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with rising <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The strong decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (for fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) down to around 215 K emphasizes the importance of accounting for the solution effect in droplets. In contrast, the impact of a varying cooling rate is low (not shown).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d1e11605">Contour plot showing the homogeneous freezing temperature of supercooled solution droplets over the wet radius and water activity. The cooling rate is set to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 K s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2319/2024/acp-24-2319-2024-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e11639">The presented data are available from the corresponding author upon request (andreas.bier@dlr.de).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e11645">AB performed the simulations, created the tables and figures, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AB and SU conceptualized the study, and they evaluated and interpreted the results. AB, SU, JZ and TJW wrote and edited the manuscript. AB, SU, JZ, DH and AL advanced and extended the box model code. JZ updated the figures during the revision.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e11651">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e11657">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e11663">This work has been funded by the DLR internal project “H2CONTRAIL”.  We thank Xavier Vancassel for providing the original FLUDILES trajectory data set.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e11668">This research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; grant no. BI 2128/1-1) and the HORIZON-JU-Clean-Aviation project HYDEA (grant agreement ID 101102019; <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3030/101102019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3030/101102019</ext-link>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e11678">This paper was edited by Farahnaz Khosrawi and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Airbus(2022)}}?><label>Airbus(2022)</label><?label airbus2022?><mixed-citation>Airbus: How Blue Condor will accelerate Airbus' first hydrogen-powered test flights, <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/stories/2022-07-how-blue-condor-will-accelerate-airbus-first-hydrogen-powered-test-flights">https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/stories/2022-07-how-blue-condor-will-accelerate-airbus-first-hydrogen-powered-test-flights</ext-link> (last access: 19 February 2024), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Andreae et~al.(2005)Andreae, Jones, and Cox}}?><label>Andreae et al.(2005)Andreae, Jones, and Cox</label><?label AndreaeJonesCox2005?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O., Jones, C. D., and Cox, P. M.: Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future, Nature, 435, 1187–1190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03671" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature03671</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Beer et~al.(2020)Beer, Hendricks, Righi, Heinold, Tegen, Gro{\ss},
Sauer, Walser, and Weinzierl}}?><label>Beer et al.(2020)Beer, Hendricks, Righi, Heinold, Tegen, Groß, Sauer, Walser, and Weinzierl</label><?label beer2020?><mixed-citation>Beer, C. G., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Heinold, B., Tegen, I., Groß, S., Sauer, D., Walser, A., and Weinzierl, B.: Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4287–4303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2342?><ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Beer et~al.(2022)Beer, Hendricks, and Righi}}?><label>Beer et al.(2022)Beer, Hendricks, and Righi</label><?label beer2022inp?><mixed-citation>Beer, C. G., Hendricks, J., and Righi, M.: A global climatology of ice-nucleating particles under cirrus conditions derived from model simulations with MADE3 in EMAC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15887–15907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15887-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-15887-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bier and Burkhardt(2019)}}?><label>Bier and Burkhardt(2019)</label><?label bier2019icenuc?><mixed-citation>Bier, A. and Burkhardt, U.: Variability in Contrail Ice Nucleation and Its Dependence on Soot Number Emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 3384–3400, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029155</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bier and Burkhardt(2022)}}?><label>Bier and Burkhardt(2022)</label><?label bier2022global?><mixed-citation>Bier, A. and Burkhardt, U.: Impact of parametrizing microphysical processes in the jet and vortex phase on contrail cirrus properties and radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JD036677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036677" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD036677</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bier et~al.(2017)Bier, Burkhardt, and Bock}}?><label>Bier et al.(2017)Bier, Burkhardt, and Bock</label><?label bier2017?><mixed-citation>Bier, A., Burkhardt, U., and Bock, L.: Synoptic Control of Contrail Cirrus Life Cycles and Their Modification Due to Reduced Soot Number Emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 122,  11584–11603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD027011</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bier et~al.(2022)Bier, Unterstrasser, and
Vancassel}}?><label>Bier et al.(2022)Bier, Unterstrasser, and Vancassel</label><?label bier2022conformsoot?><mixed-citation>Bier, A., Unterstrasser, S., and Vancassel, X.: Box model trajectory studies of contrail formation using a particle-based cloud microphysics scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 823–845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-823-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-823-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bock and Burkhardt(2016{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>Bock and Burkhardt(2016a)</label><?label bock2016?><mixed-citation>Bock, L. and Burkhardt, U.: The temporal evolution of a long-lived contrail cirrus cluster: Simulations with a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 3548–3565, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024475</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bock and Burkhardt(2016{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>Bock and Burkhardt(2016b)</label><?label bock2016updateRF?><mixed-citation>Bock, L. and Burkhardt, U.: Reassessing properties and radiative forcing of contrail cirrus using a climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 9717–9736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025112</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Borrmann et~al.(2010)Borrmann, Kunkel, Weigel, Minikin, Deshler,
Wilson, Curtius, Volk, Homan, Ulanovsky, Ravegnani, Viciani, Shur, Belyaev,
Law, and Cairo}}?><label>Borrmann et al.(2010)Borrmann, Kunkel, Weigel, Minikin, Deshler, Wilson, Curtius, Volk, Homan, Ulanovsky, Ravegnani, Viciani, Shur, Belyaev, Law, and Cairo</label><?label Borrmann2010?><mixed-citation>Borrmann, S., Kunkel, D., Weigel, R., Minikin, A., Deshler, T., Wilson, J. C., Curtius, J., Volk, C. M., Homan, C. D., Ulanovsky, A., Ravegnani, F., Viciani, S., Shur, G. N., Belyaev, G. V., Law, K. S., and Cairo, F.: Aerosols in the tropical and subtropical UT/LS: in-situ measurements of submicron particle abundance and volatility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5573–5592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5573-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5573-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Boucher et~al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang}}?><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold, Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens, and Zhang</label><?label IPCC_AR5_Clouds?><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, Chap. 7,  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 571–658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</ext-link>,  ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brock et~al.(2021)Brock, Froyd, Dollner, and Christina}}?><label>Brock et al.(2021)Brock, Froyd, Dollner, and Christina</label><?label brock2021?><mixed-citation>Brock, C. A., Froyd, K. D., Dollner, M., Williamson, C. J., Schill, G., Murphy, D. M., Wagner, N. J., Kupc, A., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Schroder, J. C., Day, D. A., Price, D. J., Weinzierl, B., Schwarz, J. P., Katich, J. M., Wang, S., Zeng, L., Weber, R., Dibb, J., Scheuer, E., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Bui, T., Dean-Day, J. M., Thompson, C. R., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Bourgeois, I., Daube, B. C., Commane, R., and Wofsy, S. C.: Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15023–15063, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bräuer et~al.(2021)Bräuer, Voigt, Sauer, Kaufmann, Hahn, Scheibe,
Schlager, Huber, Le~Clerq, Moore, and Anderson}}?><label>Bräuer et al.(2021)Bräuer, Voigt, Sauer, Kaufmann, Hahn, Scheibe, Schlager, Huber, Le Clerq, Moore, and Anderson</label><?label braeuer2021biofuels?><mixed-citation>Bräuer, T., Voigt, C., Sauer, D., Kaufmann, S., Hahn, V., Scheibe, M., Schlager, H., Huber, F., Le Clercq, P., Moore, R. H., and Anderson, B. E.: Reduced ice number concentrations in contrails from low-aromatic biofuel blends, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16817–16826, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16817-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-16817-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Burkhardt et~al.(2018)Burkhardt, Bock, and Bier}}?><label>Burkhardt et al.(2018)Burkhardt, Bock, and Bier</label><?label burkhardt2018?><mixed-citation>Burkhardt, U., Bock, L., and Bier, A.: Mitigating the contrail cirrus climate impact by reducing aircraft soot number emissions, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1, 37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0046-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0046-4</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Busen and Schumann(1995)}}?><label>Busen and Schumann(1995)</label><?label busen1995?><mixed-citation> Busen, R. and Schumann, U.: Visible contrail formation from fuels with different sulfur contents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1357–1360, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Froyd et~al.(2019)Froyd, Murphy, Brock, Campuzano-Jost, Dibb,
Jimenez, Kupc, Middlebrook, Schill, Thornhill, Williamson, Wilson, and
Ziemba}}?><label>Froyd et al.(2019)Froyd, Murphy, Brock, Campuzano-Jost, Dibb, Jimenez, Kupc, Middlebrook, Schill, Thornhill, Williamson, Wilson, and Ziemba</label><?label Froyd2019?><mixed-citation>Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Brock, C. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Dibb, J. E., Jimenez, J.-L., Kupc, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Schill, G. P., Thornhill, K. L., Williamson, C. J., Wilson, J. C., and Ziemba, L. D.: A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6209–6239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6209-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-6209-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fuchs and Sutugin(1971)}}?><label>Fuchs and Sutugin(1971)</label><?label fuchssutugin1971?><mixed-citation> Fuchs, N. and Sutugin, A. G.: Highly dispersed aerosols, Topics in Current Aerosol Research, 2, 1–60, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gierens(2021)}}?><label>Gierens(2021)</label><?label gierens2021?><mixed-citation>Gierens, K.: Theory of Contrail Formation for Fuel Cells, Aerospace, 8, 164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8060164" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/aerospace8060164</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hacker(1951)}}?><label>Hacker(1951)</label><?label hacker1951?><mixed-citation>Hacker, P. T.: Experimental Values of the Surface Tension of Supercooled Water, Tech. rep., Technical Note 2510, National Advisory, <uri>https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19810068863/downloads/19810068863.pdf</uri> (last access: 19 February 2024), 1951.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hendricks et~al.(2011)Hendricks, K\"{a}rcher, and
Lohmann}}?><label>Hendricks et al.(2011)Hendricks, Kärcher, and Lohmann</label><?label hendricks2011?><mixed-citation>Hendricks, J., Kärcher, B., and Lohmann, U.: Effects of ice nuclei on cirrus clouds in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D18206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015302</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hermann et~al.(2003)Hermann, Heintzenberg, Wiedensohler, Zahn,
Heinrich, and Brenninkmeijer}}?><label>Hermann et al.(2003)Hermann, Heintzenberg, Wiedensohler, Zahn, Heinrich, and Brenninkmeijer</label><?label hermann2003caribic?><mixed-citation>Hermann, J., Heintzenberg, J., Wiedensohler, A., Zahn, A., Heinrich, G., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: Meridional distributions of aerosol particle number concentrations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere obtained by Civil Aircraft for Regular Investigation of the Atmosphere Based on an Instrument Container (CARIBIC) flights, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001077</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kaiser et~al.(2019)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, J\"{o}ckel, Tost, Kandler,
Weinzierl, Sauer, Heimerl, Schwarz, Perring, and Popp}}?><label>Kaiser et al.(2019)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Jöckel, Tost, Kandler, Weinzierl, Sauer, Heimerl, Schwarz, Perring, and Popp</label><?label kaiser2019made3?><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J. C., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kandler, K., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., Heimerl, K., Schwarz, J. P., Perring, A. E., and Popp, T.: Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 541–579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{a}rcher(2018)}}?><label>Kärcher(2018)</label><?label kaercher2018?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B.: Formation and radiative forcing of contrail cirrus, Nat. Commun., 9, 1824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K{\"{a}}rcher and Yu(2009)}}?><label>Kärcher and Yu(2009)</label><?label kaercher2009yu?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Yu, F.: Role of aircraft soot emissions in contrail formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L01804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL036649</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K{\"{a}}rcher et~al.(1996)K{\"{a}}rcher, Peter, Biermann, and
Schumann}}?><label>Kärcher et al.(1996)Kärcher, Peter, Biermann, and Schumann</label><?label kaercher1996icj?><mixed-citation> Kärcher, B., Peter, T., Biermann, U., and Schumann, U.: The Initial Composition of Jet Condensation Trails, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 3066–3083, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K{\"{a}}rcher et~al.(2009)K{\"{a}}rcher, Burkhardt, Unterstrasser, and
Minnis}}?><label>Kärcher et al.(2009)Kärcher, Burkhardt, Unterstrasser, and Minnis</label><?label kaercher2009OD?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B., Burkhardt, U., Unterstrasser, S., and Minnis, P.: Factors controlling contrail cirrus optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6229–6254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6229-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6229-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K{\"{a}}rcher et~al.(2015)K{\"{a}}rcher, Burkhardt, Bier, Bock, and
Ford}}?><label>Kärcher et al.(2015)Kärcher, Burkhardt, Bier, Bock, and Ford</label><?label kaercher2015formation?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B., Burkhardt, U., Bier, A., Bock, L., and Ford, I. J.: The microphysical pathway to contrail formation, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 7893–7927, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023491" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023491</ext-link>, 2015JD023491, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Khou et~al.(2015)Khou, Ghedha\"{i}fi, Vancassel, and
Garnier}}?><label>Khou et al.(2015)Khou, Ghedhaïfi, Vancassel, and Garnier</label><?label khou2015?><mixed-citation>Khou, J.-C., Ghedhaïfi, W., Vancassel, X., and Garnier, F.: Spatial Simulation of Contrail Formation in Near-Field of Commercial Aircraft, J. Aircraft, 52, 1927–1938, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2514/1.C033101</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2343?><ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kleine et~al.(2018)Kleine, Voigt, Sauer, Schlager, Scheibe,
Jurkat-Witschas, Kaufmann, Kärcher, and Anderson}}?><label>Kleine et al.(2018)Kleine, Voigt, Sauer, Schlager, Scheibe, Jurkat-Witschas, Kaufmann, Kärcher, and Anderson</label><?label kleine2018?><mixed-citation>Kleine, J., Voigt, C., Sauer, D., Schlager, H., Scheibe, M., Jurkat-Witschas, Kaufmann, S., Kärcher, B., and Anderson, B. E.: In situ observations of ice particle losses in a young persistent contrail, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13553–13561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL079390</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Koop et~al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter}}?><label>Koop et al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter</label><?label koop2000wad?><mixed-citation> Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–4, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kulmala(1993)}}?><label>Kulmala(1993)</label><?label kulmala1993?><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M.: Condensational Growth and Evaporation in the Transition Regime, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 19, 381–388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829308959645" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829308959645</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kumar et~al.(2009)Kumar, Sokolik, and Nenes}}?><label>Kumar et al.(2009)Kumar, Sokolik, and Nenes</label><?label kumar2009?><mixed-citation>Kumar, P., Sokolik, I. N., and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cloud droplet formation for global and regional models: including adsorption activation from insoluble CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2517–2532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2517-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2517-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kurzke(2003)}}?><label>Kurzke(2003)</label><?label kurzke2003?><mixed-citation>Kurzke, J.: Model based gas turbine parameter corrections, in: Vol. 1, ASME Turbo Expo 2003, collocated with the 2003 International Joint Power Generation Conference, 16–19 June 2003 Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 91–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2003-38234" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1115/GT2003-38234</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lee et~al.(2021)Lee, Fahey, Skowron, Allen, Burkhardt, Chen, Doherty, Freemann, Forster, Fuglestvedt, Gettelman, De~Leon, Lim, Lund, Miller, Owen, Penner, Pitari, Prather, Sausen, and Wilcox}}?><label>Lee et al.(2021)Lee, Fahey, Skowron, Allen, Burkhardt, Chen, Doherty, Freemann, Forster, Fuglestvedt, Gettelman, De Leon, Lim, Lund, Miller, Owen, Penner, Pitari, Prather, Sausen, and Wilcox</label><?label lee2021aviation?><mixed-citation>Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty, S. J., Freemann, S., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J., Gettelman, A., De Leon, R. R., Lim, L. L., Lund, T. M., Miller, R. J., Owen, B., Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Prather, M. J., Sausen, R., and Wilcox, L. J.: The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2010 to 2018, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lee et~al.(2003)Lee, Reeves, Wilson, Hunton, Viggiano, Miller,
Ballenthin, and Lait}}?><label>Lee et al.(2003)Lee, Reeves, Wilson, Hunton, Viggiano, Miller, Ballenthin, and Lait</label><?label lee2003ionnuc?><mixed-citation>Lee, S.-H., Reeves, J. M., Wilson, J. C., Hunton, D. E., Viggiano, A. A., Miller, T. M., Ballenthin, J. O., and Lait, L. R.: Particle Formation by Ion Nucleation in the Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere, Science, 301, 1886–1889, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1087236" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1087236</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lewellen(2020)}}?><label>Lewellen(2020)</label><?label lewellen2020?><mixed-citation>Lewellen, D. C.: A Large-Eddy Simulation Study of Contrail Ice Number Formation, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 2585–2604, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0322.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-19-0322.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2014)Liu, Zhao, Nekat, Ma, Wiedensohler, Pinxteren,
Spindler, M\"{u}ller, and Hermann}}?><label>Liu et al.(2014)Liu, Zhao, Nekat, Ma, Wiedensohler, Pinxteren, Spindler, Müller, and Hermann</label><?label liu2014?><mixed-citation>Liu, H. J., Zhao, C. S., Nekat, B., Ma, N., Wiedensohler, A., van Pinxteren, D., Spindler, G., Müller, K., and Herrmann, H.: Aerosol hygroscopicity derived from size-segregated chemical composition and its parameterization in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2525–2539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2525-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2525-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Marcolli(2017)}}?><label>Marcolli(2017)</label><?label marcolli2017?><mixed-citation>Marcolli, C.: Pre-activation of aerosol particles by ice preserved in pores, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1595–1622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1595-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1595-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Marquart et~al.(2005)Marquart, Ponater, Str\"{o}m, and
Gierens}}?><label>Marquart et al.(2005)Marquart, Ponater, Ström, and Gierens</label><?label marquart2005?><mixed-citation> Marquart, S., Ponater, M., Ström, L., and Gierens, K.: An upgraded estimate of the radiative forcing of cryoplane contrails, Meteorol. Z., 14, 573–582, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mason(1971)}}?><label>Mason(1971)</label><?label mason1971?><mixed-citation>Mason, B.: The physics of clouds, Clarendon Press, Oxford, ISBN 10 0198516037, <uri>https://openlibrary.org/books/OL5692210M/The_physics_of_clouds</uri> (last access: 19 February 2024), 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Minikin et~al.(2003)Minikin, Petzold, Str\"{o}m, Krejci, Seifert,
Velthoven, Schlager, and Schumann}}?><label>Minikin et al.(2003)Minikin, Petzold, Ström, Krejci, Seifert, Velthoven, Schlager, and Schumann</label><?label minikin2003inka?><mixed-citation>Minikin, A., Petzold, A., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Seifert, M., van Velthoven, P., Schlager, H., and Schumann, U.: Aircraft observations of the upper tropospheric fine particle aerosol in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres at midlatitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016458" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016458</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Moore et~al.(2017)Moore, Thornhill, Weinzierl, Sauer, D'Ascoli, Kim,
Lichtenstern, Scheibe, Beaton, Beyersdorf, Barrick, Bulzan, Corr, Crosbie,
Jurkat, Martin, Riddick, Shook, Slover, Voigt, White, Winstead, Yasky,
Ziemba, Brown, Schlager, and Anderson}}?><label>Moore et al.(2017)Moore, Thornhill, Weinzierl, Sauer, D'Ascoli, Kim, Lichtenstern, Scheibe, Beaton, Beyersdorf, Barrick, Bulzan, Corr, Crosbie, Jurkat, Martin, Riddick, Shook, Slover, Voigt, White, Winstead, Yasky, Ziemba, Brown, Schlager, and Anderson</label><?label moore2017?><mixed-citation>Moore, R. H., Thornhill, K. L., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., D'Ascoli, E., Kim, J., Lichtenstern, M., Scheibe, M., Beaton, B., Beyersdorf, A. J., Barrick, J., Bulzan, D., Corr, C. A., Crosbie, E., Jurkat, T., Martin, R., Riddick, D., Shook, M., Slover, G., Voigt, C., White, R., Winstead, E., Yasky, R., Ziemba, L. D., Brown, A., Schlager, H., and Anderson, B. E.: Biofuel blending reduces particle emissions from aircraft engines at cruise conditions, Nature, 543, 411–415, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature21420</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Najjar(2013)}}?><label>Najjar(2013)</label><?label najjar2013?><mixed-citation>Najjar, Y.: Hydrogen safety: The road toward green technology., Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 38, 10716–10728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.126" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.126</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{O and Wood(2016)}}?><label>O and Wood(2016)</label><?label owood2016?><mixed-citation>O, K.-T. and Wood, R.: Exploring an approximation for the homogeneous freezing temperature of water droplets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7239–7249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7239-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7239-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Padro et~al.(2010)Padro, Tkacik, Lathem, Hennigan, Sullivan, Weber,
Huey, and Nenes}}?><label>Padro et al.(2010)Padro, Tkacik, Lathem, Hennigan, Sullivan, Weber, Huey, and Nenes</label><?label padro2010?><mixed-citation>Padro, L. T., Tkacik, D., Lathem, T., Hennigan, C. J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., Huey, L. G., and Nenes, A.: Investigation of cloud condensation nuclei properties and droplet growth kinetics of the water-soluble aerosol fraction in Mexico City, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D09204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013195" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013195</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Paoli et~al.(2013)Paoli, Nybelen, Picot, and Cariolle}}?><label>Paoli et al.(2013)Paoli, Nybelen, Picot, and Cariolle</label><?label paoli2013jet?><mixed-citation>Paoli, R., Nybelen, L., Picot, J., and Cariolle, D.: Effects of jet/vortex interaction on contrail formation in supersaturated conditions, Phys. Fluids, 25, 1–28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4807063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4807063</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Peng et~al.(2022)Peng, Chen, and Tang}}?><label>Peng et al.(2022)Peng, Chen, and Tang</label><?label peng2022?><mixed-citation> Peng, C., Chen, L., and Tang, M.: A database for deliquescence and efflorescence relative humidities of compounds with atmospheric relevance, Fundamental Research, 2, 578–587, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)}}?><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><?label petters2007?><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Petzold et~al.(2002)Petzold, Fiebig, Keil, Leiterer, Schr\"{o}der,
Stifter, Wendisch, and Wendling}}?><label>Petzold et al.(2002)Petzold, Fiebig, Keil, Leiterer, Schröder, Stifter, Wendisch, and Wendling</label><?label petzold2002lace?><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Fiebig, M., Keil, A., Leiterer, U., Schröder, F., Stifter, A., Wendisch, M., and Wendling, P.: Vertical variability of aerosol properties observed at a continental site during the Lindenberg Aerosol Characterization Experiment (LACE 98), J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001043</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Petzold et~al.(2005)Petzold, Gysel, Vancassel, Hitzenberger, Puxbaum,
Vrochticky, Weingartner, Baltensperger, and Mirabel}}?><label>Petzold et al.(2005)Petzold, Gysel, Vancassel, Hitzenberger, Puxbaum, Vrochticky, Weingartner, Baltensperger, and Mirabel</label><?label petzold2005fsc?><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Gysel, M., Vancassel, X., Hitzenberger, R., Puxbaum, H., Vrochticky, S., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Mirabel, P.: On the effects of organic matter and sulphur-containing compounds on the CCN activation of combustion particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3187–3203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3187-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-3187-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pletzer et~al.(2022)Pletzer, Hauglustaine, Cohen, J\"{o}ckel, and
Grewe}}?><label>Pletzer et al.(2022)Pletzer, Hauglustaine, Cohen, Jöckel, and Grewe</label><?label pletzer2022?><mixed-citation>Pletzer, J., Hauglustaine, D., Cohen, Y., Jöckel, P., and Grewe, V.: The climate impact of hydrogen-powered hypersonic transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14323–14354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14323-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-14323-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ponater et~al.(2002)Ponater, Marquart, and Sausen}}?><label>Ponater et al.(2002)Ponater, Marquart, and Sausen</label><?label ponater2002ccg?><mixed-citation> Ponater, M., Marquart, S., and Sausen, R.: Contrails in a comprehensive global climate model: Parameterization and radiative forcing results, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 941–960, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ponater et~al.(2006)Ponater, Pechtl, Sausen, Schumann, and
H{\"{u}}ttig}}?><label>Ponater et al.(2006)Ponater, Pechtl, Sausen, Schumann, and Hüttig</label><?label ponater2006potential?><mixed-citation> Ponater, M., Pechtl, S., Sausen, R., Schumann, U., and Hüttig, G.: Potential of the cryoplane technology to reduce aircraft climate impact: A state-of-the-art assessment, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6928–6944, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riechers et~al.(2013)Riechers, Wittbracht, Hütten, and
Koop}}?><label>Riechers et al.(2013)Riechers, Wittbracht, Hütten, and Koop</label><?label riechers2013?><mixed-citation>Riechers, B., Wittbracht, F., Hütten, A., and Koop, T.: The homogeneous ice nucleation rate of water droplets produced in a microfluidic device and the role of temperature uncertainty, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 5873–5887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp42437e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c3cp42437e</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2344?><ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Righi et~al.(2013)Righi, Hendricks, and Sausen}}?><label>Righi et al.(2013)Righi, Hendricks, and Sausen</label><?label righi2013?><mixed-citation>Righi, M., Hendricks, J., and Sausen, R.: The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol: simulations for year 2000 emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9939–9970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9939-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9939-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Righi et~al.(2016)Righi, Hendricks, and Sausen}}?><label>Righi et al.(2016)Righi, Hendricks, and Sausen</label><?label righi2016?><mixed-citation>Righi, M., Hendricks, J., and Sausen, R.: The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol in 2030 – Part 2: Aviation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4481–4495, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4481-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4481-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rogers et~al.(1998)Rogers, DeMott, Kreidenweis, and
Chen}}?><label>Rogers et al.(1998)Rogers, DeMott, Kreidenweis, and Chen</label><?label rogers1998success?><mixed-citation>Rogers, D. C., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Chen, Y.: Measurements of ice nucleating aerosols during SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1383–1386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97gl03478" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97gl03478</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schmale et~al.(2010)Schmale, Schneider, Jurkat, Voigt, Kalesse,
Rautenhaus, Lichtenstern, Schlager, Ancellet, Arnold, Gerding, Mattis,
Wendisch, and Borrmann}}?><label>Schmale et al.(2010)Schmale, Schneider, Jurkat, Voigt, Kalesse, Rautenhaus, Lichtenstern, Schlager, Ancellet, Arnold, Gerding, Mattis, Wendisch, and Borrmann</label><?label Schmale2010?><mixed-citation>Schmale, J., Schneider, J., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kalesse, H., Rautenhaus, M., Lichtenstern, M., Schlager, H., Ancellet, G., Arnold, F., Gerding, M., Mattis, I., Wendisch, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol layers from the 2008 eruptions of Mount Okmok and Mount Kasatochi: In situ upper troposphere and lower stratosphere measurements of sulfate and organics over Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00L07, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013628" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013628</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schumann(1996)}}?><label>Schumann(1996)</label><?label schumann1996ccf?><mixed-citation> Schumann, U.: On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts, Meteorol. Z., 5, 4–23, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schumann et~al.(2002)Schumann, Arnold, Busen, Curtius, K{\"{a}}rcher,
Kiendler, Petzold, Schlager, Schr{\"{o}}der, and Wohlfrom}}?><label>Schumann et al.(2002)Schumann, Arnold, Busen, Curtius, Kärcher, Kiendler, Petzold, Schlager, Schröder, and Wohlfrom</label><?label schumann2002ifs?><mixed-citation>Schumann, U., Arnold, F., Busen, R., Curtius, J., Kärcher, B., Kiendler, A., Petzold, A., Schlager, H., Schröder, F., and Wohlfrom, K.: Influence of fuel sulfur on the composition of aircraft exhaust plumes: The experiments SULFUR 1-7, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4247, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000813" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000813</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{S{\"{o}}lch and K{\"{a}}rcher(2010)}}?><label>Sölch and Kärcher(2010)</label><?label soelch2010lcm?><mixed-citation>Sölch, I. and Kärcher, B.: A large-eddy model for cirrus clouds with explicit aerosol and ice microphysics and Lagrangian ice particle tracking, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 2074–2093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.689</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{S{\"{o}}lch and K{\"{a}}rcher(2011)}}?><label>Sölch and Kärcher(2011)</label><?label soelch2011process?><mixed-citation> Sölch, I. and Kärcher, B.: Process-oriented large-eddy simulations of a midlatitude cirrus cloud system based on observations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 374–393, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sorjamaa and Laaksonen(2007)}}?><label>Sorjamaa and Laaksonen(2007)</label><?label sorjamaa2007?><mixed-citation>Sorjamaa, R. and Laaksonen, A.: The effect of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O adsorption on cloud drop activation of insoluble particles: a theoretical framework, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6175–6180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6175-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-6175-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stier et~al.(2005)Stier, Feichter, Kinne, Kloster, Vignati, Wilson,
Ganzeveld, Tegen, Werner, Balkanski, Schulz, Boucher, Minikin, and
Petzold}}?><label>Stier et al.(2005)Stier, Feichter, Kinne, Kloster, Vignati, Wilson, Ganzeveld, Tegen, Werner, Balkanski, Schulz, Boucher, Minikin, and Petzold</label><?label stier2005ham?><mixed-citation>Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J., Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Str{\"{o}}m and Gierens(2002)}}?><label>Ström and Gierens(2002)</label><?label stroem2002fsc?><mixed-citation>Ström, L. and Gierens, K.: First simulations of cryoplane contrails, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000838</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tomsche et~al.(2022)Tomsche, Marsing, Jurkat-Witschas, Lucke,
Kaufmann, Kaiser, Schneider, Scheibe, Schlager, R\"{o}der, Fischer,
Obersteiner, Zahn, Z\"{o}ger, Lelieveld, and Voigt}}?><label>Tomsche et al.(2022)Tomsche, Marsing, Jurkat-Witschas, Lucke, Kaufmann, Kaiser, Schneider, Scheibe, Schlager, Röder, Fischer, Obersteiner, Zahn, Zöger, Lelieveld, and Voigt</label><?label Tomsche2022?><mixed-citation>Tomsche, L., Marsing, A., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Lucke, J., Kaufmann, S., Kaiser, K., Schneider, J., Scheibe, M., Schlager, H., Röder, L., Fischer, H., Obersteiner, F., Zahn, A., Zöger, M., Lelieveld, J., and Voigt, C.: Enhanced sulfur in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in spring 2020, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15135–15151, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15135-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-15135-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tremmel et~al.(1998)Tremmel, Schlager, Konopka, Schulte, Arnold,
Klemm, and Droste-Franke}}?><label>Tremmel et al.(1998)Tremmel, Schlager, Konopka, Schulte, Arnold, Klemm, and Droste-Franke</label><?label tremmel1998?><mixed-citation>Tremmel, H. G., Schlager, H., Konopka, P., Schulte, P., Arnold, F., Klemm, M., and Droste-Franke, B.: Observations and model calculations of jet aircraft exhaust products at cruise altitude and inferred initial OH emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 10803–10816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD03451</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ungeheuer et~al.(2021)Ungeheuer, van Pinxteren, and
D.}}?><label>Ungeheuer et al.(2021)Ungeheuer, van Pinxteren, and D.</label><?label ungeheuer2021?><mixed-citation>Ungeheuer, F., van Pinxteren, and D., Vogel, A. L.: Identification and source attribution of organic compounds in ultrafine particles near Frankfurt International Airport, Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 21, 3763–3775, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3763-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-3763-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ungeheuer et~al.(2022)Ungeheuer, Caudillo, Ditas, Simon, van
Pinxteren, Kilic, Rose, Jacobi, K\"{u}rten, Curtius, and Vogel}}?><label>Ungeheuer et al.(2022)Ungeheuer, Caudillo, Ditas, Simon, van Pinxteren, Kilic, Rose, Jacobi, Kürten, Curtius, and Vogel</label><?label ungeheuer2022?><mixed-citation>Ungeheuer, F., Caudillo, L., Ditas, F., Simon, M., van Pinxteren, D., Kilic, D., Rose, D., Jacobi, S., Kürten, A., Curtius, J., and Vogel, A. L.: Nucleation of jet engine oil vapours is a large source of aviation-related ultrafine particles, Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 3, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-022-006</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Unterstrasser(2014)}}?><label>Unterstrasser(2014)</label><?label unterstrasser2014contrail3D?><mixed-citation>Unterstrasser, S.: Large eddy simulation study of contrail microphysics and geometry during the vortex phase and consequences on contrail-to-cirrus transition, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 7537–7555, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021418</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Unterstrasser and Gierens(2010)}}?><label>Unterstrasser and Gierens(2010)</label><?label unterstrasser10part2?><mixed-citation>Unterstrasser, S. and Gierens, K.: Numerical simulations of contrail-to-cirrus transition – Part 2: Impact of initial ice crystal number, radiation, stratification, secondary nucleation and layer depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2037–2051, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2037-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2037-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Unterstrasser and S{\"{o}}lch(2014)}}?><label>Unterstrasser and Sölch(2014)</label><?label unterstrasser2014gmd?><mixed-citation>Unterstrasser, S. and Sölch, I.: Optimisation of the simulation particle number in a Lagrangian ice microphysical model, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 695–709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-695-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-695-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Unterstrasser et~al.(2017{\natexlab{a}})Unterstrasser, Gierens,
S{\"{o}}lch, and Lainer}}?><label>Unterstrasser et al.(2017a)Unterstrasser, Gierens, Sölch, and Lainer</label><?label unterstrasser2017part1?><mixed-citation>Unterstrasser, S., Gierens, K., Sölch, I., and Lainer, M.: Numerical simulations of homogeneously nucleated natural cirrus and contrail-cirrus. Part 1: How different are they?, Meteorol. Z., 26, 621–642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0777" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/metz/2016/0777</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Unterstrasser et~al.(2017{\natexlab{b}})Unterstrasser, Hoffmann, and
Lerch}}?><label>Unterstrasser et al.(2017b)Unterstrasser, Hoffmann, and Lerch</label><?label unterstrasser2017gmd?><mixed-citation>Unterstrasser, S., Hoffmann, F., and Lerch, M.: Collection/aggregation algorithms in Lagrangian cloud microphysical models: rigorous evaluation in box model simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1521–1548, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1521-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-1521-2017</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vancassel et~al.(2014)Vancassel, Mirabel, and
Garnier}}?><label>Vancassel et al.(2014)Vancassel, Mirabel, and Garnier</label><?label vancassel2014?><mixed-citation>Vancassel, X., Mirabel, P., and Garnier, F.: Numerical simulation of aerosols in an aircraft wake using a 3D LES solver and a detailed microphysical model, Int. J. Sustainable Aviation, 1, 139–159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSA.2014.065480" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1504/IJSA.2014.065480</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Voigt et~al.(2021)Voigt, Kleine, Sauer, Moore, Br\"{a}uer, Le~Clercq,
Kaufmann, Scheibe, Jurkat-Witschas, Aigner, Bauder, Boose, Borrmann, Crosbie,
Diskin, DiGangi, Hahn, Heckl, Huber, Nowak, Rapp, Rauch, Robinson, Schripp,
Shook, Winstead, Ziemba, Schlager, and Anderson}}?><label>Voigt et al.(2021)Voigt, Kleine, Sauer, Moore, Bräuer, Le Clercq, Kaufmann, Scheibe, Jurkat-Witschas, Aigner, Bauder, Boose, Borrmann, Crosbie, Diskin, DiGangi, Hahn, Heckl, Huber, Nowak, Rapp, Rauch, Robinson, Schripp, Shook, Winstead, Ziemba, Schlager, and Anderson</label><?label voigt2021?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Kleine, J., Sauer, D., Moore, R. H., Bräuer, T., Le Clercq, P., Kaufmann, S., Scheibe, M., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Aigner, M., Bauder, U., Boose, Y., Borrmann, S., Crosbie, E., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J., Hahn, V., Heckl, C., Huber, F., Nowak, J. B., Rapp, M., Rauch, B., Robinson, C., Schripp, T., Shook, N., Winstead, E., Ziemba, L., Schlager, H., and Anderson, B. E.: Cleaner burning aviation fuels can reduce contrail, Communications Earth and Environment, 2, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00174-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-021-00174-y</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Voigt et~al.(2022)Voigt, Lelieveld, Schlager, Schneider, Curtius,
Meerk\"{o}tter, Sauer, Bugliar, Bohn, Crowley, Erbertseder, Gro{\ss}, Hahn, Li,
Mertens, P\"{o}hlker, Pozzer, Schumann, Tomsche, Williams, Zahn, Andreae,
Borrmann, Br\"{a}uer, D\"{o}rich, D\"{o}rnbrack, Edtbauer, Ernle, Fischer, Giez,
Granzin, Grewe, Harder, Heinritzi, Holanda, J\"{o}ckel, Kr\"{u}ger, Lucke,
Marsing, Martin, Matthes, P\"{o}hlker, P\"{o}schl, Reifenberg, Ringsdorf,
Scheibe, Tadic, Zauner-Wieczorek, Henke, and Rapp}}?><label>Voigt et al.(2022)Voigt, Lelieveld, Schlager, Schneider, Curtius, Meerkötter, Sauer, Bugliar, Bohn, Crowley, Erbertseder, Groß, Hahn, Li, Mertens, Pöhlker, Pozzer, Schumann, Tomsche, Williams, Zahn, Andreae, Borrmann, Bräuer, Dörich, Dörnbrack, Edtbauer, Ernle, Fischer, Giez, Granzin, Grewe, Harder, Heinritzi, Holanda, Jöckel, Krüger, Lucke, Marsing, Martin, Matthes, Pöhlker, Pöschl, Reifenberg, Ringsdorf, Scheibe, Tadic, Zauner-Wieczorek, Henke, and Rapp</label><?label voigt2022bams?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Lelieveld, J., Schlager, H., Schneider, J., Curtius, J., Meerkötter, R., Sauer, D., Bugliar, L., Bohn, B., Crowley, J. N., Erbertseder, T., Groß, S., Hahn, V., Li, Q., Mertens, M., Pöhlker, M. L., Pozzer, A., Schumann, U., Tomsche, L., Williams, J., Zahn, A., Andreae, M., Borrmann, S., Bräuer, T., Dörich, R., Dörnbrack, A., Edtbauer, A., Ernle, L., Fischer, H., Giez, A., Granzin, M., Grewe, V., Harder, H., Heinritzi, M., Holanda, B. A., Jöckel, Kaiser, P. K., Krüger, O. O., Lucke, J., Marsing, A., Martin, A., Matthes, S., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., Reifenberg, S., Ringsdorf, A., Scheibe, M., Tadic, I., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Henke, R., and Rapp, M.: Cleaner Skies during the COVID-19 Lockdown, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E1796–E1827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0012.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0012.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2345?><ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Volponi(1998)}}?><label>Volponi(1998)</label><?label volponi1998?><mixed-citation>Volponi, A. J.: Gas turbine parameter corrections, in: vol. 5, ASME 1998 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, 2–5 June 1998, Stockholm, Sweden,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/98-GT-347" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1115/98-GT-347</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2020)Wang, Kong, Marten, He, Chen, Pfeifer, and
Donahue}}?><label>Wang et al.(2020)Wang, Kong, Marten, He, Chen, Pfeifer, and Donahue</label><?label wang2020?><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Kong, W., Marten, R., He, X., Chen, D., Pfeifer, J., and Donahue, N. M.: Rapid growth of new atmospheric particles by nitric acid and ammonia condensation, Nature, 581,  184–189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2270-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-2270-4</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wilcox et~al.(2012)Wilcox, Shine, and Hoski}}?><label>Wilcox et al.(2012)Wilcox, Shine, and Hoski</label><?label wilcox2012?><mixed-citation>Wilcox, L. J., Shine, K. P., and Hoski, B. J.: Radiative forcing due to aviation water vapour emissions, Atmos. Environ., 63, 1–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.072</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yu and Turco(1997)}}?><label>Yu and Turco(1997)</label><?label yuturco1997?><mixed-citation>Yu, F. and Turco, R. P.: The role of ions in the formation and evolution of particles in aircraft plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 1927–1930, 1997.  </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yu et~al.(2010)Yu, Liscinsky, Winstead, True, Timko, Bhargava,
Herndon, Miake-Lye, and Anderson}}?><label>Yu et al.(2010)Yu, Liscinsky, Winstead, True, Timko, Bhargava, Herndon, Miake-Lye, and Anderson</label><?label yu2010?><mixed-citation>Yu, Z., Liscinsky, D. S., Winstead, E. L., True, B. S., Timko, M. T., Bhargava, A., Herndon, S. C., Miake-Lye, R. C., and Anderson, B. E.: Characterization of Lubrication Oil Emissions from Aircraft Engines, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 9530–9534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102145z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es102145z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yu et~al.(2012)Yu, Herndon, Ziemba, Timko, Liscinsky, Anderson, and
Miake-Lye}}?><label>Yu et al.(2012)Yu, Herndon, Ziemba, Timko, Liscinsky, Anderson, and Miake-Lye</label><?label yu2012?><mixed-citation>Yu, Z., Herndon, S. C., Ziemba, L. D., Timko, M. T., Liscinsky, D. S., Anderson, B. E., and Miake-Lye, R. C.: Identification of Lubrication Oil in the Particulate Matter Emissions from Engine Exhaust of In-Service Commercial Aircraft, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9630–9637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301692t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es301692t</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Contrail formation on ambient aerosol particles  for aircraft with hydrogen combustion:  a box model trajectory study</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Airbus(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Airbus: How Blue Condor will accelerate Airbus' first hydrogen-powered test
flights,
<a href="https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/stories/2022-07-how-blue-condor-will-accelerate-airbus-first-hydrogen-powered-test-flights" target="_blank">https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/stories/2022-07-how-blue-condor-will-accelerate-airbus-first-hydrogen-powered-test-flights</a>
(last access: 19 February 2024), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Andreae et al.(2005)Andreae, Jones, and Cox</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andreae, M. O., Jones, C. D., and Cox, P. M.: Strong present-day aerosol
cooling implies a hot future, Nature, 435, 1187–1190,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03671" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03671</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Beer et al.(2020)Beer, Hendricks, Righi, Heinold, Tegen, Groß,
Sauer, Walser, and Weinzierl</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beer, C. G., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Heinold, B., Tegen, I., Groß, S., Sauer, D., Walser, A., and Weinzierl, B.: Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4287–4303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Beer et al.(2022)Beer, Hendricks, and Righi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beer, C. G., Hendricks, J., and Righi, M.: A global climatology of ice-nucleating particles under cirrus conditions derived from model simulations with MADE3 in EMAC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15887–15907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15887-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15887-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bier and Burkhardt(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bier, A. and Burkhardt, U.: Variability in Contrail Ice Nucleation and Its
Dependence on Soot Number Emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 3384–3400,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029155</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bier and Burkhardt(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bier, A. and Burkhardt, U.: Impact of parametrizing microphysical processes in the jet and vortex phase on contrail cirrus properties and radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JD036677, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036677" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036677</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bier et al.(2017)Bier, Burkhardt, and Bock</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bier, A., Burkhardt, U., and Bock, L.: Synoptic Control of Contrail Cirrus Life
Cycles and Their Modification Due to Reduced Soot Number Emissions, J.
Geophys. Res., 122,  11584–11603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027011</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bier et al.(2022)Bier, Unterstrasser, and
Vancassel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bier, A., Unterstrasser, S., and Vancassel, X.: Box model trajectory studies of contrail formation using a particle-based cloud microphysics scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 823–845, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-823-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-823-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bock and Burkhardt(2016a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bock, L. and Burkhardt, U.: The temporal evolution of a long-lived contrail
cirrus cluster: Simulations with a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res.,
121, 3548–3565, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024475</a>, 2016a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bock and Burkhardt(2016b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bock, L. and Burkhardt, U.: Reassessing properties and radiative forcing of
contrail cirrus using a climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 9717–9736,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025112</a>, 2016b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Borrmann et al.(2010)Borrmann, Kunkel, Weigel, Minikin, Deshler,
Wilson, Curtius, Volk, Homan, Ulanovsky, Ravegnani, Viciani, Shur, Belyaev,
Law, and Cairo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Borrmann, S., Kunkel, D., Weigel, R., Minikin, A., Deshler, T., Wilson, J. C., Curtius, J., Volk, C. M., Homan, C. D., Ulanovsky, A., Ravegnani, F., Viciani, S., Shur, G. N., Belyaev, G. V., Law, K. S., and Cairo, F.: Aerosols in the tropical and subtropical UT/LS: in-situ measurements of submicron particle abundance and volatility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5573–5592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5573-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5573-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.: Clouds and Aerosols, Chap. 7,  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 571–658,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</a>,  ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Brock et al.(2021)Brock, Froyd, Dollner, and Christina</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brock, C. A., Froyd, K. D., Dollner, M., Williamson, C. J., Schill, G., Murphy, D. M., Wagner, N. J., Kupc, A., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Schroder, J. C., Day, D. A., Price, D. J., Weinzierl, B., Schwarz, J. P., Katich, J. M., Wang, S., Zeng, L., Weber, R., Dibb, J., Scheuer, E., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Bui, T., Dean-Day, J. M., Thompson, C. R., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Bourgeois, I., Daube, B. C., Commane, R., and Wofsy, S. C.: Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15023–15063, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Bräuer et al.(2021)Bräuer, Voigt, Sauer, Kaufmann, Hahn, Scheibe,
Schlager, Huber, Le Clerq, Moore, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bräuer, T., Voigt, C., Sauer, D., Kaufmann, S., Hahn, V., Scheibe, M., Schlager, H., Huber, F., Le Clercq, P., Moore, R. H., and Anderson, B. E.: Reduced ice number concentrations in contrails from low-aromatic biofuel blends, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16817–16826, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16817-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16817-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Burkhardt et al.(2018)Burkhardt, Bock, and Bier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burkhardt, U., Bock, L., and Bier, A.: Mitigating the contrail cirrus climate
impact by reducing aircraft soot number emissions, npj Climate and
Atmospheric Science, 1, 37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0046-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0046-4</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Busen and Schumann(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Busen, R. and Schumann, U.: Visible contrail formation from fuels with
different sulfur contents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1357–1360, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Froyd et al.(2019)Froyd, Murphy, Brock, Campuzano-Jost, Dibb,
Jimenez, Kupc, Middlebrook, Schill, Thornhill, Williamson, Wilson, and
Ziemba</label><mixed-citation>
      
Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Brock, C. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Dibb, J. E., Jimenez, J.-L., Kupc, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Schill, G. P., Thornhill, K. L., Williamson, C. J., Wilson, J. C., and Ziemba, L. D.: A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6209–6239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6209-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6209-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fuchs and Sutugin(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fuchs, N. and Sutugin, A. G.: Highly dispersed aerosols, Topics in Current
Aerosol Research, 2, 1–60, 1971.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Gierens(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gierens, K.: Theory of Contrail Formation for Fuel Cells, Aerospace, 8, 164,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8060164" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8060164</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Hacker(1951)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hacker, P. T.: Experimental Values of the Surface Tension of Supercooled Water, Tech. rep., Technical Note 2510, National Advisory,
<a href="https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19810068863/downloads/19810068863.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 19 February 2024), 1951.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hendricks et al.(2011)Hendricks, Kärcher, and
Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hendricks, J., Kärcher, B., and Lohmann, U.: Effects of ice nuclei on cirrus
clouds in a global climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D18206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015302</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Hermann et al.(2003)Hermann, Heintzenberg, Wiedensohler, Zahn,
Heinrich, and Brenninkmeijer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hermann, J., Heintzenberg, J., Wiedensohler, A., Zahn, A., Heinrich, G., and
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: Meridional distributions of aerosol particle number
concentrations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere obtained by
Civil Aircraft for Regular Investigation of the Atmosphere Based on an
Instrument Container (CARIBIC) flights, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001077</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Kaiser et al.(2019)Kaiser, Hendricks, Righi, Jöckel, Tost, Kandler,
Weinzierl, Sauer, Heimerl, Schwarz, Perring, and Popp</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaiser, J. C., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kandler, K., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., Heimerl, K., Schwarz, J. P., Perring, A. E., and Popp, T.: Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 541–579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Kärcher(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B.: Formation and radiative forcing of contrail cirrus, Nat.
Commun., 9, 1824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Kärcher and Yu(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B. and Yu, F.: Role of aircraft soot emissions in contrail
formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L01804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036649</a>,
2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Kärcher et al.(1996)Kärcher, Peter, Biermann, and
Schumann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B., Peter, T., Biermann, U., and Schumann, U.: The Initial
Composition of Jet Condensation Trails, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 3066–3083,
1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kärcher et al.(2009)Kärcher, Burkhardt, Unterstrasser, and
Minnis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B., Burkhardt, U., Unterstrasser, S., and Minnis, P.: Factors controlling contrail cirrus optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6229–6254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6229-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6229-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Kärcher et al.(2015)Kärcher, Burkhardt, Bier, Bock, and
Ford</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kärcher, B., Burkhardt, U., Bier, A., Bock, L., and Ford, I. J.: The
microphysical pathway to contrail formation, J. Geophys. Res., 120,
7893–7927, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023491" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023491</a>, 2015JD023491, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Khou et al.(2015)Khou, Ghedhaïfi, Vancassel, and
Garnier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khou, J.-C., Ghedhaïfi, W., Vancassel, X., and Garnier, F.: Spatial
Simulation of Contrail Formation in Near-Field of Commercial Aircraft, J.
Aircraft, 52, 1927–1938, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033101</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Kleine et al.(2018)Kleine, Voigt, Sauer, Schlager, Scheibe,
Jurkat-Witschas, Kaufmann, Kärcher, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kleine, J., Voigt, C., Sauer, D., Schlager, H., Scheibe, M., Jurkat-Witschas,
Kaufmann, S., Kärcher, B., and Anderson, B. E.: In situ observations of ice
particle losses in a young persistent contrail, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
13553–13561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079390" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079390</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Koop et al.(2000)Koop, Luo, Tsias, and Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant
for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–4,
2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kulmala(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kulmala, M.: Condensational Growth and Evaporation in the Transition Regime,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 19, 381–388,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829308959645" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829308959645</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kumar et al.(2009)Kumar, Sokolik, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kumar, P., Sokolik, I. N., and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cloud droplet formation for global and regional models: including adsorption activation from insoluble CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2517–2532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2517-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2517-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kurzke(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kurzke, J.: Model based gas turbine parameter corrections, in: Vol. 1, ASME Turbo Expo 2003, collocated with the 2003 International Joint Power Generation Conference, 16–19 June 2003 Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 91–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2003-38234" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2003-38234</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Lee et al.(2021)Lee, Fahey, Skowron, Allen, Burkhardt, Chen, Doherty, Freemann, Forster, Fuglestvedt, Gettelman, De Leon, Lim, Lund, Miller, Owen, Penner, Pitari, Prather, Sausen, and Wilcox</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q.,
Doherty, S. J., Freemann, S., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J., Gettelman, A.,
De Leon, R. R., Lim, L. L., Lund, T. M., Miller, R. J., Owen, B., Penner,
J. E., Pitari, G., Prather, M. J., Sausen, R., and Wilcox, L. J.: The
contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2010 to
2018, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Lee et al.(2003)Lee, Reeves, Wilson, Hunton, Viggiano, Miller,
Ballenthin, and Lait</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, S.-H., Reeves, J. M., Wilson, J. C., Hunton, D. E., Viggiano, A. A.,
Miller, T. M., Ballenthin, J. O., and Lait, L. R.: Particle Formation by Ion
Nucleation in the Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere, Science, 301,
1886–1889, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1087236" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1087236</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Lewellen(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lewellen, D. C.: A Large-Eddy Simulation Study of Contrail Ice Number
Formation, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 2585–2604, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0322.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0322.1</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Liu et al.(2014)Liu, Zhao, Nekat, Ma, Wiedensohler, Pinxteren,
Spindler, Müller, and Hermann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, H. J., Zhao, C. S., Nekat, B., Ma, N., Wiedensohler, A., van Pinxteren, D., Spindler, G., Müller, K., and Herrmann, H.: Aerosol hygroscopicity derived from size-segregated chemical composition and its parameterization in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2525–2539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2525-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2525-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Marcolli(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marcolli, C.: Pre-activation of aerosol particles by ice preserved in pores, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1595–1622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1595-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1595-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Marquart et al.(2005)Marquart, Ponater, Ström, and
Gierens</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marquart, S., Ponater, M., Ström, L., and Gierens, K.: An upgraded estimate
of the radiative forcing of cryoplane contrails, Meteorol. Z., 14, 573–582,
2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Mason(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mason, B.: The physics of clouds, Clarendon Press, Oxford, ISBN 10 0198516037, <a href="https://openlibrary.org/books/OL5692210M/The_physics_of_clouds" target="_blank"/> (last access: 19 February 2024), 1971.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Minikin et al.(2003)Minikin, Petzold, Ström, Krejci, Seifert,
Velthoven, Schlager, and Schumann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Minikin, A., Petzold, A., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Seifert, M., van Velthoven, P., Schlager, H., and Schumann, U.: Aircraft observations of the upper tropospheric fine particle aerosol in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres at midlatitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016458" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016458</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Moore et al.(2017)Moore, Thornhill, Weinzierl, Sauer, D'Ascoli, Kim,
Lichtenstern, Scheibe, Beaton, Beyersdorf, Barrick, Bulzan, Corr, Crosbie,
Jurkat, Martin, Riddick, Shook, Slover, Voigt, White, Winstead, Yasky,
Ziemba, Brown, Schlager, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moore, R. H., Thornhill, K. L., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., D'Ascoli, E., Kim,
J., Lichtenstern, M., Scheibe, M., Beaton, B., Beyersdorf, A. J., Barrick,
J., Bulzan, D., Corr, C. A., Crosbie, E., Jurkat, T., Martin, R., Riddick,
D., Shook, M., Slover, G., Voigt, C., White, R., Winstead, E., Yasky, R.,
Ziemba, L. D., Brown, A., Schlager, H., and Anderson, B. E.: Biofuel blending
reduces particle emissions from aircraft engines at cruise conditions,
Nature, 543, 411–415, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21420" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21420</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Najjar(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Najjar, Y.: Hydrogen safety: The road toward green technology.,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 38, 10716–10728,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.126" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.126</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>O and Wood(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
O, K.-T. and Wood, R.: Exploring an approximation for the homogeneous freezing temperature of water droplets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7239–7249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7239-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7239-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Padro et al.(2010)Padro, Tkacik, Lathem, Hennigan, Sullivan, Weber,
Huey, and Nenes</label><mixed-citation>
      
Padro, L. T., Tkacik, D., Lathem, T., Hennigan, C. J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber,
R. J., Huey, L. G., and Nenes, A.: Investigation of cloud condensation nuclei
properties and droplet growth kinetics of the water-soluble aerosol fraction
in Mexico City, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D09204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013195" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013195</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Paoli et al.(2013)Paoli, Nybelen, Picot, and Cariolle</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paoli, R., Nybelen, L., Picot, J., and Cariolle, D.: Effects of jet/vortex
interaction on contrail formation in supersaturated conditions, Phys. Fluids,
25, 1–28, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4807063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4807063</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Peng et al.(2022)Peng, Chen, and Tang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peng, C., Chen, L., and Tang, M.: A database for deliquescence and
efflorescence relative humidities of compounds with atmospheric relevance,
Fundamental Research, 2, 578–587, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Petzold et al.(2002)Petzold, Fiebig, Keil, Leiterer, Schröder,
Stifter, Wendisch, and Wendling</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petzold, A., Fiebig, M., Keil, A., Leiterer, U., Schröder, F., Stifter, A.,
Wendisch, M., and Wendling, P.: Vertical variability of aerosol properties
observed at a continental site during the Lindenberg Aerosol Characterization
Experiment (LACE 98), J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8128,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001043</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Petzold et al.(2005)Petzold, Gysel, Vancassel, Hitzenberger, Puxbaum,
Vrochticky, Weingartner, Baltensperger, and Mirabel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petzold, A., Gysel, M., Vancassel, X., Hitzenberger, R., Puxbaum, H., Vrochticky, S., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Mirabel, P.: On the effects of organic matter and sulphur-containing compounds on the CCN activation of combustion particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3187–3203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3187-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3187-2005</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Pletzer et al.(2022)Pletzer, Hauglustaine, Cohen, Jöckel, and
Grewe</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pletzer, J., Hauglustaine, D., Cohen, Y., Jöckel, P., and Grewe, V.: The climate impact of hydrogen-powered hypersonic transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14323–14354, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14323-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14323-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Ponater et al.(2002)Ponater, Marquart, and Sausen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ponater, M., Marquart, S., and Sausen, R.: Contrails in a comprehensive global
climate model: Parameterization and radiative forcing results, J. Geophys.
Res., 107, 941–960, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Ponater et al.(2006)Ponater, Pechtl, Sausen, Schumann, and
Hüttig</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ponater, M., Pechtl, S., Sausen, R., Schumann, U., and Hüttig, G.:
Potential of the cryoplane technology to reduce aircraft climate impact: A
state-of-the-art assessment, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6928–6944, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Riechers et al.(2013)Riechers, Wittbracht, Hütten, and
Koop</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riechers, B., Wittbracht, F., Hütten, A., and Koop, T.: The homogeneous ice
nucleation rate of water droplets produced in a microfluidic device and the
role of temperature uncertainty, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15,
5873–5887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp42437e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp42437e</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Righi et al.(2013)Righi, Hendricks, and Sausen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Righi, M., Hendricks, J., and Sausen, R.: The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol: simulations for year 2000 emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9939–9970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9939-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9939-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Righi et al.(2016)Righi, Hendricks, and Sausen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Righi, M., Hendricks, J., and Sausen, R.: The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol in 2030 – Part 2: Aviation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4481–4495, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4481-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4481-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Rogers et al.(1998)Rogers, DeMott, Kreidenweis, and
Chen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rogers, D. C., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Chen, Y.: Measurements of
ice nucleating aerosols during SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1383–1386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97gl03478" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97gl03478</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Schmale et al.(2010)Schmale, Schneider, Jurkat, Voigt, Kalesse,
Rautenhaus, Lichtenstern, Schlager, Ancellet, Arnold, Gerding, Mattis,
Wendisch, and Borrmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmale, J., Schneider, J., Jurkat, T., Voigt, C., Kalesse, H., Rautenhaus, M.,
Lichtenstern, M., Schlager, H., Ancellet, G., Arnold, F., Gerding, M.,
Mattis, I., Wendisch, M., and Borrmann, S.: Aerosol layers from the 2008
eruptions of Mount Okmok and Mount Kasatochi: In situ upper troposphere and
lower stratosphere measurements of sulfate and organics over Europe, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D00L07,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013628" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013628</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Schumann(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schumann, U.: On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts,
Meteorol. Z., 5, 4–23, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Schumann et al.(2002)Schumann, Arnold, Busen, Curtius, Kärcher,
Kiendler, Petzold, Schlager, Schröder, and Wohlfrom</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schumann, U., Arnold, F., Busen, R., Curtius, J., Kärcher, B., Kiendler,
A., Petzold, A., Schlager, H., Schröder, F., and Wohlfrom, K.: Influence
of fuel sulfur on the composition of aircraft exhaust plumes: The experiments
SULFUR 1-7, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4247, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000813" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000813</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Sölch and Kärcher(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sölch, I. and Kärcher, B.: A large-eddy model for cirrus clouds with
explicit aerosol and ice microphysics and Lagrangian ice particle tracking,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 2074–2093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.689" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.689</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Sölch and Kärcher(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sölch, I. and Kärcher, B.: Process-oriented large-eddy simulations of a
midlatitude cirrus cloud system based on observations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 137, 374–393, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Sorjamaa and Laaksonen(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sorjamaa, R. and Laaksonen, A.: The effect of H<sub>2</sub>O adsorption on cloud drop activation of insoluble particles: a theoretical framework, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6175–6180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6175-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6175-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Stier et al.(2005)Stier, Feichter, Kinne, Kloster, Vignati, Wilson,
Ganzeveld, Tegen, Werner, Balkanski, Schulz, Boucher, Minikin, and
Petzold</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J., Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Ström and Gierens(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ström, L. and Gierens, K.: First simulations of cryoplane contrails, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, 4346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000838</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Tomsche et al.(2022)Tomsche, Marsing, Jurkat-Witschas, Lucke,
Kaufmann, Kaiser, Schneider, Scheibe, Schlager, Röder, Fischer,
Obersteiner, Zahn, Zöger, Lelieveld, and Voigt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tomsche, L., Marsing, A., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Lucke, J., Kaufmann, S., Kaiser, K., Schneider, J., Scheibe, M., Schlager, H., Röder, L., Fischer, H., Obersteiner, F., Zahn, A., Zöger, M., Lelieveld, J., and Voigt, C.: Enhanced sulfur in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in spring 2020, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15135–15151, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15135-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15135-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Tremmel et al.(1998)Tremmel, Schlager, Konopka, Schulte, Arnold,
Klemm, and Droste-Franke</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tremmel, H. G., Schlager, H., Konopka, P., Schulte, P., Arnold, F., Klemm, M.,
and Droste-Franke, B.: Observations and model calculations of jet aircraft
exhaust products at cruise altitude and inferred initial OH emissions, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 10803–10816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03451</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Ungeheuer et al.(2021)Ungeheuer, van Pinxteren, and
D.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ungeheuer, F., van Pinxteren, and D., Vogel, A. L.: Identification and source
attribution of organic compounds in ultrafine particles near Frankfurt
International Airport, Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 21, 3763–3775,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3763-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3763-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Ungeheuer et al.(2022)Ungeheuer, Caudillo, Ditas, Simon, van
Pinxteren, Kilic, Rose, Jacobi, Kürten, Curtius, and Vogel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ungeheuer, F., Caudillo, L., Ditas, F., Simon, M., van Pinxteren, D., Kilic,
D., Rose, D., Jacobi, S., Kürten, A., Curtius, J., and Vogel, A. L.:
Nucleation of jet engine oil vapours is a large source of aviation-related ultrafine particles, Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 3, 1–8,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-006</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Unterstrasser(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Unterstrasser, S.: Large eddy simulation study of contrail microphysics and
geometry during the vortex phase and consequences on contrail-to-cirrus
transition, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 7537–7555, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021418</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Unterstrasser and Gierens(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Unterstrasser, S. and Gierens, K.: Numerical simulations of contrail-to-cirrus transition – Part 2: Impact of initial ice crystal number, radiation, stratification, secondary nucleation and layer depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2037–2051, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2037-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2037-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Unterstrasser and Sölch(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Unterstrasser, S. and Sölch, I.: Optimisation of the simulation particle number in a Lagrangian ice microphysical model, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 695–709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-695-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-695-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Unterstrasser et al.(2017a)Unterstrasser, Gierens,
Sölch, and Lainer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Unterstrasser, S., Gierens, K., Sölch, I., and Lainer, M.: Numerical
simulations of homogeneously nucleated natural cirrus and contrail-cirrus.
Part 1: How different are they?, Meteorol. Z., 26, 621–642,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0777" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0777</a>, 2017a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Unterstrasser et al.(2017b)Unterstrasser, Hoffmann, and
Lerch</label><mixed-citation>
      
Unterstrasser, S., Hoffmann, F., and Lerch, M.: Collection/aggregation algorithms in Lagrangian cloud microphysical models: rigorous evaluation in box model simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1521–1548, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1521-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1521-2017</a>, 2017b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Vancassel et al.(2014)Vancassel, Mirabel, and
Garnier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vancassel, X., Mirabel, P., and Garnier, F.: Numerical simulation of aerosols
in an aircraft wake using a 3D LES solver and a detailed microphysical model,
Int. J. Sustainable Aviation, 1, 139–159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSA.2014.065480" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSA.2014.065480</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Voigt et al.(2021)Voigt, Kleine, Sauer, Moore, Bräuer, Le Clercq,
Kaufmann, Scheibe, Jurkat-Witschas, Aigner, Bauder, Boose, Borrmann, Crosbie,
Diskin, DiGangi, Hahn, Heckl, Huber, Nowak, Rapp, Rauch, Robinson, Schripp,
Shook, Winstead, Ziemba, Schlager, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Voigt, C., Kleine, J., Sauer, D., Moore, R. H., Bräuer, T., Le Clercq, P.,
Kaufmann, S., Scheibe, M., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Aigner, M., Bauder, U.,
Boose, Y., Borrmann, S., Crosbie, E., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J., Hahn, V.,
Heckl, C., Huber, F., Nowak, J. B., Rapp, M., Rauch, B., Robinson, C.,
Schripp, T., Shook, N., Winstead, E., Ziemba, L., Schlager, H., and Anderson,
B. E.: Cleaner burning aviation fuels can reduce contrail, Communications
Earth and Environment, 2, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00174-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00174-y</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Voigt et al.(2022)Voigt, Lelieveld, Schlager, Schneider, Curtius,
Meerkötter, Sauer, Bugliar, Bohn, Crowley, Erbertseder, Groß, Hahn, Li,
Mertens, Pöhlker, Pozzer, Schumann, Tomsche, Williams, Zahn, Andreae,
Borrmann, Bräuer, Dörich, Dörnbrack, Edtbauer, Ernle, Fischer, Giez,
Granzin, Grewe, Harder, Heinritzi, Holanda, Jöckel, Krüger, Lucke,
Marsing, Martin, Matthes, Pöhlker, Pöschl, Reifenberg, Ringsdorf,
Scheibe, Tadic, Zauner-Wieczorek, Henke, and Rapp</label><mixed-citation>
      
Voigt, C., Lelieveld, J., Schlager, H., Schneider, J., Curtius, J.,
Meerkötter, R., Sauer, D., Bugliar, L., Bohn, B., Crowley, J. N.,
Erbertseder, T., Groß, S., Hahn, V., Li, Q., Mertens, M., Pöhlker,
M. L., Pozzer, A., Schumann, U., Tomsche, L., Williams, J., Zahn, A.,
Andreae, M., Borrmann, S., Bräuer, T., Dörich, R., Dörnbrack, A.,
Edtbauer, A., Ernle, L., Fischer, H., Giez, A., Granzin, M., Grewe, V.,
Harder, H., Heinritzi, M., Holanda, B. A., Jöckel, Kaiser, P. K., Krüger,
O. O., Lucke, J., Marsing, A., Martin, A., Matthes, S., Pöhlker, C.,
Pöschl, U., Reifenberg, S., Ringsdorf, A., Scheibe, M., Tadic, I.,
Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Henke, R., and Rapp, M.: Cleaner Skies during the
COVID-19 Lockdown, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E1796–E1827,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0012.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0012.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Volponi(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Volponi, A. J.: Gas turbine parameter corrections, in: vol. 5, ASME 1998 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition,
2–5 June 1998, Stockholm, Sweden,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/98-GT-347" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1115/98-GT-347</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Wang et al.(2020)Wang, Kong, Marten, He, Chen, Pfeifer, and
Donahue</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, M., Kong, W., Marten, R., He, X., Chen, D., Pfeifer, J., and Donahue,
N. M.: Rapid growth of new atmospheric particles by nitric acid and ammonia
condensation, Nature, 581,  184–189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2270-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2270-4</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Wilcox et al.(2012)Wilcox, Shine, and Hoski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilcox, L. J., Shine, K. P., and Hoski, B. J.: Radiative forcing due to
aviation water vapour emissions, Atmos. Environ., 63, 1–43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.072" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.072</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Yu and Turco(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, F. and Turco, R. P.: The role of ions in the formation and evolution of
particles in aircraft plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 1927–1930, 1997.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Yu et al.(2010)Yu, Liscinsky, Winstead, True, Timko, Bhargava,
Herndon, Miake-Lye, and Anderson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, Z., Liscinsky, D. S., Winstead, E. L., True, B. S., Timko, M. T., Bhargava,
A., Herndon, S. C., Miake-Lye, R. C., and Anderson, B. E.: Characterization
of Lubrication Oil Emissions from Aircraft Engines, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
44, 9530–9534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es102145z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es102145z</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Yu et al.(2012)Yu, Herndon, Ziemba, Timko, Liscinsky, Anderson, and
Miake-Lye</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, Z., Herndon, S. C., Ziemba, L. D., Timko, M. T., Liscinsky, D. S.,
Anderson, B. E., and Miake-Lye, R. C.: Identification of Lubrication Oil in
the Particulate Matter Emissions from Engine Exhaust of In-Service Commercial
Aircraft, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9630–9637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301692t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es301692t</a>,
2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
