<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{ACP Letters}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-24-2033-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>Moist bias in the Pacific upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) in climate models affects <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>regional circulation patterns</article-title><alt-title>Regional water vapour circulation coupling in the UTLS</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Regional water vapour circulation coupling in the UTLS}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{F. Ploeger et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ploeger</surname><given-names>Felix</given-names></name>
          <email>f.ploeger@fz-juelich.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Birner</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2966-3428</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Charlesworth</surname><given-names>Edward</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-8881</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Konopka</surname><given-names>Paul</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-830X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>Rolf</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5024-9977</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Energy and Climate Research: Stratosphere (IEK-7), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Meteorological Institute Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Felix Ploeger (f.ploeger@fz-juelich.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>February</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>2033</fpage><lpage>2043</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>September</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>October</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7</day><month>December</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day><month>December</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 Felix Ploeger et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2033/2024/acp-24-2033-2024.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2033/2024/acp-24-2033-2024.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2033/2024/acp-24-2033-2024.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2033/2024/acp-24-2033-2024.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e133">Water vapour in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) is a key radiative agent and a crucial factor in the Earth's climate system. Here, we investigate a common regional moist bias in the Pacific UTLS during Northern Hemisphere summer in state-of-the-art climate models. We demonstrate, through a combination of climate model experiments and satellite observations, that the Pacific moist bias amplifies local long-wave cooling, which ultimately impacts regional circulation systems in the UTLS. Related impacts involve a strengthening of isentropic potential vorticity gradients, strengthened westerlies in the Pacific westerly duct region, and a zonally displaced anticyclonic monsoon circulation. Furthermore, we show that the regional Pacific moist bias can be significantly reduced by applying a Lagrangian, less-diffusive transport scheme and that such a model improvement could be important for improving the simulation of regional circulation systems, in particular in the Asian monsoon and Pacific region.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e145">Notwithstanding the low abundance of water vapour in the stratosphere, with mixing ratios of the order of parts per million above the cold tropical tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.1"/>, stratospheric water vapour variations play a crucial role for climate variability. Variations in stratospheric water vapour have been shown to account for up to 30 % of decadal variations in the radiative budget <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.2"/>. In a future climate with rising greenhouse gas levels, climate models predict significant stratospheric water vapour increases, strongest in the lowermost stratosphere directly above the extratropical tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.3"/>. The processes causing this increase are under debate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.4"/>. Recently, indications for an increase in stratospheric water vapour have been found from satellite observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.5"/>, which could be partly related to decadal variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.6"/>. As stratospheric water vapour acts as an impactful greenhouse gas, an increase in its abundance will cause a positive climate feedback, ranging between about 0.1–0.3 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.7"/>, and substantial effects on atmospheric temperatures and dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.8"/>, with the largest fraction of these effects caused by water vapour increases in the lowermost stratosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e199">However, it is particularly the lowermost stratosphere where current global climate models show the largest differences between simulations and observations in stratospheric water vapour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.9"/>. These moist biases in the simulations appear to be related to numerical diffusion in model transport schemes; they can be significantly reduced when employing less diffusive Lagrangian schemes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.10"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.11"/> showed that lower-stratospheric water vapour, in particular the model moist bias in that region, exerts a first-order effect on the zonal mean atmospheric circulation, with water<?pagebreak page2034?> vapour increases causing a strengthening of the stratospheric circulation, upward and poleward shifts of the subtropical jets, and a poleward shift of the tropospheric eddy-driven jet. Hence, improving the representation of stratospheric water vapour in climate models appears to be essential for the simulation of zonal mean circulation in climate models and future projections.</p>
      <p id="d1e211">A particularly strong moisture source for the lower stratosphere is the anticyclonic Asian monsoon circulation during boreal summer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.12"/>, which causes the ascending moist air masses to partly bypass the coldest regions of the tropical tropopause and to retain relatively high moisture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.13"/>. Hence, the Asian monsoon circulation features the largest positive water vapour anomaly in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) (here, “anomaly” is used for the deviation from zonal mean, while “bias” is used for the difference between model and observations). Although the air masses are, to some degree, confined within the monsoon anticyclone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.14"/>, Rossby-wave breaking along the anticyclone edge may cause substantial transport of moisture into the extratropical lowermost stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.15"/>. Analysis of the distribution of water vapour in the lower stratosphere simulated by a specific climate model has shown a substantial model bias in the Asian monsoon region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.16"/>. In the model, the maximum monsoon moisture anomaly was found to be displaced far into the Pacific region compared to satellite observations which show the moisture maximum in the Asian monsoon circulation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.17"/> further showed that this model bias was likely a transport issue and could be reduced by increasing the model resolution.</p>
      <p id="d1e233">Here, we combine a dedicated climate model experiment with the ECHAM MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry model (EMAC), statistical analysis of a suite of historical climate model simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and satellite observations by the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) to investigate regional water vapour anomalies in the UTLS and related effects on regional circulation systems. The EMAC model experiment employs either the standard “control” configuration or a new “modified-Lagrangian” transport scheme with the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS) coupled to EMAC (see Methods section in Appendix A), allowing the effects of model transport on stratospheric water vapour to be isolated. These EMAC model simulations are the same as those recently published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.18"/>, but here we extend their zonal mean analysis to a regional level to address the following questions. (i) Where are the strongest biases in UTLS water vapour in current climate models compared to satellite observations? (ii) How do regional anomalies in UTLS water vapour affect regional atmospheric circulation systems, in particular in the Asian monsoon and in the Pacific region?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e247">The strongest regional water vapour anomalies in the UTLS, as compared to the zonal mean distribution, occur in the Asian and North American monsoon circulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.19"/>, with the relative strength between Asian and American anomalies under debate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.20"/>. At 100 hPa, a common level for studying UTLS water vapour, satellite observations by the MLS (see Methods section) show almost 2 ppmv (around 40 %) higher water vapour mixing ratios above Asia than above the Pacific during boreal summer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a). Current global climate models from the CMIP6 model intercomparison project show largest regional water vapour biases in that region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b) and a substantial displacement of the moisture anomaly towards the Pacific when compared to satellite observations. This moisture bias has already been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.21"/> and has been related to transport effects, but only for a single model. Here, we show that in the Pacific UTLS the moisture bias is a common feature of the CMIP6 models, clearly visible in the multi-model mean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b) and reaching even higher values for specific models (Supplement Fig. S3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e268"> Water vapour zonal anomalies at 100 hPa in boreal summer (June–August) from <bold>(a)</bold> MLS satellite observations and from different climate model simulations, with panel <bold>(b)</bold> showing CMIP6 multi-model mean, panel <bold>(c)</bold> showing modified-Lagrangian EMAC-CLaMS, and panel <bold>(d)</bold> showing control EMAC. Black contours show climatological water vapour mixing ratios (1 ppmv steps). <bold>(e, f)</bold> Zonal wind velocity at 100 hPa from EMAC-CLaMS <bold>(e)</bold> and EMAC <bold>(f)</bold>, together with the climatological PV distribution (black contours, 2 PVU steps).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2033/2024/acp-24-2033-2024-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e299">Consistent with the CMIP6 models, the EMAC climate model in its control set-up (see Methods section) shows a strong moisture bias in the summertime UTLS above the Pacific (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d). In EMAC, the moist bias extends even further across the Pacific than for the CMIP6 multi-model mean but overall lies within the spread of CMIP6 models (Supplement Fig. S3). After switching to a Lagrangian transport scheme, the modified-Lagrangian EMAC-CLaMS simulation (see Methods section) shows remarkably better agreement with MLS satellite observations in terms of UTLS water vapour (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c). Hence, Lagrangian transport appears to significantly reduce the strong regional moisture bias in the summertime Pacific lower stratosphere in current global climate models. Note that the global mean water vapour mixing ratio in the modified-Lagrangian simulation is too low compared to MLS observations, due to a known cold bias in temperatures in the tropical tropopause layer (TTL) in temperatures in EMAC, but the focus of the present paper is on regional anomalies.</p>
      <p id="d1e307">Water vapour is a radiatively active gas, thus we expect the additional moisture above the Pacific in the control EMAC simulation to affect atmospheric temperatures and circulation. The additional moisture causes enhanced long-wave cooling, which decreases temperatures in the UTLS above the Pacific. These decreased temperatures imply increased westerly zonal wind and decreased (more equatorward) meridional wind above the Pacific, consistent with thermal wind balance (see Methods section). Indeed, the westerlies in the Pacific UTLS close to the Equator strengthen in response to the additional moisture in the Pacific UTLS (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d; see also the Discussion section).</p>
      <p id="d1e312">Latitude–altitude cross-sections in the Pacific UTLS show that the additional moisture in the control EMAC simulation<?pagebreak page2035?> extends well above the tropopause, causing enhanced long-wave cooling and decreased temperatures particularly in the lowermost stratosphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a–c). In the lowermost stratosphere, potential vorticity (PV) increases in response to the additional moisture, and the isentropic PV gradient strengthens, especially around the tropopause (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d–f). Notably, the water vapour contours in the control EMAC simulation are not following the PV structure, indicating a decoupling of the simulated water vapour distribution from transport associated with large-scale dynamics. Satellite observations, on the other hand, show a clear anticorrelation between water vapour mixing ratios and PV in the UTLS (correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv per PVU, where PVU represents potential vorticity units), which is opposite in the control EMAC simulation (positive correlation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.24</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv per PVU; see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>g, h). Again, the modified-Lagrangian simulation avoids this transport bias and results in much better agreement with the observations (correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv per PVU, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>i).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e380"> Water vapour cross-sections in the Pacific region (180–200<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in boreal summer (June–August) for <bold>(a)</bold> MLS satellite observations, <bold>(b)</bold> modified-Lagrangian EMAC-CLaMS climate model simulation, and <bold>(c)</bold> the difference between control EMAC and Lagrangian modified EMAC-CLaMS simulations. White contours show temperature <bold>(a, b)</bold> and the temperature difference between the two simulations <bold>(c)</bold>. The thick grey line is the thermal (lapse rate) tropopause; the dashed grey line the 360 K isentrope. <bold>(d–f)</bold> Same but for PV colour coded and zonal wind as white contours (in d; PV is taken from ERA5). <bold>(g–i)</bold> Correlation between water vapour and potential vorticity at 360 K potential temperature level in the Pacific region (15–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 140–240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) for <bold>(g)</bold> MLS satellite observations and ERA5 reanalysis PV, <bold>(h)</bold> control EMAC, and <bold>(i)</bold> modified-Lagrangian EMAC-CLaMS. The Pearson correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and linear regression slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in each panel, and the linear regression fit is illustrated as dashed black line.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2033/2024/acp-24-2033-2024-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e462">The unphysical correlation between water vapour mixing ratios and PV is an indication that the moisture bias in the control simulation is caused by small-scale, unresolved processes, namely numerical diffusion in the advective transport scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.22"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and Methods section</named-content></xref>. The less diffusive Lagrangian transport scheme in the modified-Lagrangian EMAC-CLaMS model results in a more efficient sampling of cold tropopause regions and in less moisture transport into the lower stratosphere. Indeed, it is just the change in the model transport scheme and not the induced circulation changes which reduces the moist bias, as a sensitivity simulation without including the dynamical feedback of the water vapour changes provided very similar results to the modified-Lagrangian simulation with dynamical feedback included (see Supplement Fig. S1).</p>
      <p id="d1e472">Moreover, the increased Pacific moisture modifies the Asian monsoon circulation. Differences in meridional velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between the control and the modified-Lagrangian simulations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a) show a strengthening of the<?pagebreak page2036?> equatorward flow on the eastern edge of the monsoon anticyclone related to the water-vapour-induced long-wave cooling, decreased temperatures, and modified zonal temperature gradient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the Pacific (see Methods section). Thus, the increased water vapour above the Pacific in control EMAC causes a strengthened, eastward-shifted equatorward flow at the eastern edge of the monsoon anticyclone, associated with a zonal broadening of the monsoon circulation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e503">
<bold>(a)</bold> Difference in meridional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind between control EMAC minus modified-Lagrangian EMAC-CLaMS for a longitude section across the Asian monsoon (15–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, June–August). Black contours show climatological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind (from Lagrangian modified-EMAC simulation; northward solid, southward dashed); the thick grey line is the tropopause. White hatching highlights regions of negative model difference in zonal temperature gradient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K per degree, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is longitude). Black dots indicate where the difference is not statistically significant at 95 % confidence level. <bold>(b)</bold> Same model difference but for zonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind and as longitude section across the Pacific (15–25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). Black contours show climatological zonal wind. White hatching highlights regions of negative model difference in meridional temperature gradient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K per degree, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is latitude). <bold>(c)</bold> The CMIP6 inter-model correlation between meridional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind and the Pacific H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O index, measuring the strength of the Pacific moisture anomaly across models (see Methods section) for the same longitude section as in panel <bold>(a)</bold>. Solid black lines show multi-model mean meridional wind; the grey line shows the tropopause from ERA5. Black dots indicate where the correlation is not significant at 95 % confidence level. <bold>(d)</bold> Same inter-model correlation but for zonal wind and the same longitude section as in <bold>(b)</bold>. Solid black lines show multi-model mean zonal wind. <bold>(e)</bold> Inter-model correlation between Pacific H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O index and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind averaged in the Pacific UTLS (15–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 130–155<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 100–70 hPa). The vertical lines indicate CMIP6 models with relatively high vertical resolution, horizontal lines show those with high horizontal resolution, and “observations” corresponds to MLS H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and ERA5 wind. The correlation coefficient for CMIP6 models is given in the legend. <bold>(f)</bold> Same but for the correlation with zonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind averaged over 15–25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 160–185<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 130–90 hPa.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2033/2024/acp-24-2033-2024-f03.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e723"> Geopotential height zonal anomalies at 100 hPa for boreal summer (June–August) from <bold>(a)</bold> ERA5 and <bold>(b)</bold> CMIP6 multi-model mean. Black contours show climatological geopotential height, and black arrows illustrate horizontal wind velocity. <bold>(c)</bold> Zonal profiles of geopotential height at the latitude of the monsoon geopotential height maximum (see Methods section) from CMIP6 models (grey), multi-model mean (black dashed), and ERA5 (red). Red error bars show the standard deviation of year-to-year variability for ERA5 data. <bold>(d)</bold> Zonal profiles of zonal wind across the Pacific at 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N from CMIP6 models (grey), multi-model mean (black), and ERA5 (red).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2033/2024/acp-24-2033-2024-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page2038?><p id="d1e753">Eastward of the Asian monsoon circulation is the region of the Pacific westerly ducts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.23"/>, where westerly winds may extend to and across the Equator (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e, f, white contours). Note that the term “westerly ducts” usually refers to the boreal winter circulation; here we refer to similar characteristics of the wind structure during summer. Differences between the control simulation and the modified-Lagrangian simulation of zonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind in the subtropics (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b) show that the westerlies above the Pacific (east of 140<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) strengthen in response to enhanced Pacific moisture, consistent with the water-vapour-induced cooling and modified meridional temperature gradient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b, and Methods section). Thus, the moist bias in the Pacific UTLS is associated with strengthened westerly ducts. Slight displacements between the zonal wind and water vapour changes indicate that, likely, the response is not entirely local (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e810">As the Pacific UTLS moisture bias is similar between control EMAC and CMIP6 models, effects on regional circulation systems are also expected to be similar. In the CMIP6 models, the anticyclonic Asian monsoon circulation appears displaced towards the east when compared to ERA5 geopotential height (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a, b), in particular when considering zonal geopotential height anomaly profiles across the anticyclone centre (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c, and Methods section). All CMIP6 models show monsoon-associated geopotential height anomalies that are shifted eastward with respect to those in ERA5, with related differences larger than year-to-year variability (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c, red error bars).</p>
      <p id="d1e819">Based on similarity between CMIP6 inter-model correlations with the effects of the Pacific moist bias in the EMAC model experiment, we hypothesize in the following that CMIP6 model differences could partly be related to the moisture content in the Pacific UTLS. The CMIP6 inter-model correlation between local meridional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-wind velocity in the monsoon anticyclone and a water vapour index measuring the strength of the Pacific moisture anomaly (see Methods section) shows a significant anticorrelation above about 100 hPa and eastward of 120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c, with the mean correlation for winds averaged over a broader region shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>e). In other words, those models with a moister lower stratosphere above the Pacific simulate an anticyclonic monsoon circulation which is displaced further east. Above the tropopause in the lower stratosphere, the pattern of negative/positive CMIP6 inter-model correlation resembles the pattern of negative/positive differences in meridional flow in the EMAC model experiment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). Hence, the enhanced equatorward flow at the eastern monsoon anticyclone edge appears related to the strength of the water vapour anomaly above the Pacific, in both the EMAC model experiment and in CMIP6 models. Those models with a moister Pacific UTLS simulate an eastward-displaced monsoon anticyclone.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2039?><p id="d1e844">Prevailing westerlies in the Pacific UTLS, the westerly ducts, allow Rossby waves to propagate further towards and even across the Equator <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.24"/> and to cause inter-hemispheric exchange <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.25"/>. Therefore, a realistic representation of the westerly ducts in atmospheric models is important for correctly simulating the global distribution of trace gases and pollutants, especially for species with strong emissions in the Northern Hemisphere. Zonal profiles of zonal wind in the northern tropics show that most CMIP6 models simulate too strong westerlies above the Pacific (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d) compared to ERA5. Furthermore, CMIP6 inter-model correlations between zonal wind and Pacific UTLS moisture show a significant correlation in the Pacific subtropics around the tropopause (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d, f), although weaker than for meridional wind at the eastern monsoon edge (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c). The correlation for zonal wind implies that those models with increased Pacific moisture simulate stronger westerly ducts, consistent with the effect of enhanced Pacific moisture in the EMAC model experiment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b). Hence, the overestimated westerly ducts in CMIP6 models appear to be related, at least partly, to the model moist bias above the Pacific.</p>
      <p id="d1e862">Differences in the simulated moisture bias are likely related to differences in diffusive model transport which are caused by differences in resolution or in the transport scheme. Across the CMIP6 ensemble, the strength of the bias is not related in a simple manner to horizontal or vertical model resolution. Although the smallest biases occur in those models with relatively high vertical resolution, different models with relatively high number of levels or horizontal grid points simulate very different biases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>e–f). Exploring these issues in more detail would require dedicated model experiments with changes in the resolution in the UTLS.</p>
      <p id="d1e868">Differences in model transport could also affect other trace gas species with large gradients, like ozone. However, as water vapour shows particularly steep gradients in the UTLS the associated effects on circulation are also expected to be comparably strong.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e879">We show that a distinct moist bias above the Pacific in the summertime UTLS is a common feature of current climate models. This regional moist bias is not related to large-scale transport characteristics, and the expected anticorrelation between UTLS water vapour and PV breaks down. The bias can be significantly reduced by applying a Lagrangian, numerically less-diffusive transport scheme, as realized in the modified-Lagrangian EMAC-CLaMS simulation. The analysis of a dedicated climate model experiment and CMIP6 models further shows that the Pacific moist bias affects regional circulation patterns by enhancing local long-wave cooling and modifying temperature gradients. In particular, our results indicate that the water vapour increase in the Pacific UTLS strengthens the Pacific westerly ducts and causes zonal displacement of the Asian monsoon upper-level anticyclonic flow. Hence, improving the representation of water vapour in the Pacific UTLS region in models, e.g. by employing a less diffusive (Lagrangian) transport scheme, will affect regional circulation systems and could be a promising way to improve model simulations of current and future climate conditions, e.g. in the Asian monsoon and Pacific regions.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>A1</label><title>Satellite observations</title>
      <p id="d1e902">The simulated water vapour distributions from the different models are compared to observations from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) instrument on board the Aura satellite (version 5 data), which started operation in 2004. MLS provides a relatively high sampling of the globe from about 82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to 82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, with about 3500 profiles per day. In the UTLS region, the MLS water vapour product has a vertical resolution of about 3 km. The MLS averaging kernels have been shown to induce artefacts in the water vapour distribution, in particular vertical oscillations at high latitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.26"/>, but they have no large influence on lower, subtropical latitudes, which are the focus of this paper. As the main goal of the paper is to investigate differences between model simulations, we refrain from smoothing the model profiles with the satellite averaging kernels. For comparison with the model data, monthly mean climatologies have been compiled from the MLS data on the original MLS pressure levels and for the period 2005–2015. For further information on MLS water vapour and the retrieval technique, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.27"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>A2</label><title>EMAC model simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e937">The chemistry–climate model used for this study is the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry model (EMAC). EMAC couples the ECHAM5 dynamical core to physical processes via the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) middleware <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">for details, see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>. The simulations analysed for this study employ a T42 spectral resolution (about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude–longitude resolution), have 90 vertical levels from the surface to 0.01 hPa, and are free-running with prescribed sea surface temperatures and radiatively active substances <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">for further details, see</named-content></xref>. The simulation period spans 40 years starting in 1970, with only the last 10 years (2000–2009) considered for this paper. We ensured that the presented results are insensitive to the choice of period by checking robustness for the period 1990–1999 (and for 1979–2020 for ERA5 variables).</p>
      <p id="d1e972">Water vapour is calculated online and includes methane oxidation as chemical source in the stratosphere. In particular, we compare two different simulations with stratospheric water vapour transported either with the flux-form semi-Lagrangian standard EMAC transport scheme (denoted “control” EMAC) or with the Lagrangian transport scheme CLaMS (Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere), denoted “modified-Lagrangian” EMAC, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.30"/>. Due to its Lagrangian nature, the CLaMS transport scheme has largely reduced numerical diffusion compared to the standard EMAC transport <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.31"/>. In both<?pagebreak page2040?> simulations, the water vapour is coupled to the model radiation and thereby affects atmospheric temperature and circulation. Note that the Lagrangian water vapour calculation for this study only ranges from about 250 hPa (more precisely the model level closest to 250 hPa) to the model top, to ensure that model differences originate solely from stratospheric water vapour. As the only difference between both simulations is the used transport scheme for stratospheric water vapour, differences in temperatures and circulation can be unambiguously attributed to the transport scheme.</p>
      <p id="d1e981">To further clarify the roles of the changed transport scheme versus the induced dynamical effects for the water vapour model differences, an additional sensitivity simulation was carried out with stratospheric water vapour calculated with Lagrangian CLaMS transport but not coupled to radiation. The close similarity of the lower-stratospheric water vapour distribution with the modified Lagrangian simulation (with stratospheric water vapour coupled to radiation) shows that the water vapour differences compared to the control EMAC simulation are mainly related to the difference in the transport scheme (numerical diffusion) and not to the induced dynamical effects (Supplement Fig. S1).</p>
      <p id="d1e984">A second sensitivity simulation was carried out for the first year of the simulation period with tendency output for the control EMAC water vapour. These additional diagnostic terms which are output by EMAC include the tendencies due to advection, clouds (mainly dehydration processes at levels around the tropopause), convection, and parameterized vertical diffusion  (Supplement Fig. S2). Consideration of the different model tendencies in the EMAC model shows that the moistening in the Pacific lower stratosphere in control EMAC is the net effect of the interplay of advection of moist tropospheric air masses and dehydration by cloud processes (Supplement Fig. S2). In the region of the moist bias over the Pacific, advective moistening dominates and causes a net moist bias there during boreal summer. Hence, the excessive moisture transport in the standard EMAC model transport scheme appears related to excessive numerical diffusion in the advective transport. This EMAC sensitivity analysis does not exclude a more significant effect of convection in other models or in the real atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <label>A3</label><title>ERA5 reanalysis</title>
      <p id="d1e995">The ERA5 reanalysis from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) covers the period from 1949 onwards <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.32"/>. Here, we use monthly mean climatologies compiled from ERA5 wind, PV, geopotential height, and temperature data for the period 2005–2015 for better comparability with MLS observations and the climate model simulations. The ERA5 data assimilation system is based on the ECMWF Integrated Forecast System, cycle CY41R2, and uses a 4D-Var assimilation scheme. ERA5 data are available hourly, with a horizontal resolution of about 30 km (T639 spectral resolution) and a vertical range from the surface to about 0.01 hPa (137 hybrid levels). For the monthly mean climatologies shown in this paper, we used ERA5 data every 6 h, truncated to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude–longitude grid and with full vertical resolution, as provided by ECMWF.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS4">
  <label>A4</label><title>CMIP6 model intercomparison project</title>
      <p id="d1e1029">To place the EMAC simulations into context, we compare them to climate model simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6 (CMIP6). CMIP6 is a multi-model intercomparison activity which has been carried out in support of the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC (AR6). Here, we consider the historical simulations which are fully coupled model simulations, with external forcings from solar variability, volcanic aerosols, and anthropogenic emissions (greenhouse gases, aerosol) following observations. If ozone chemistry is not included, the models use prescribed time-varying ozone concentrations. These simulations cover the period 1850–2014, but we only use the data for 2000–2014 for better comparability with the other data sets. From the CMIP6 models investigated recently by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.33"/> and which have been shown to have reasonable stratospheric water vapour, those 18 models with the necessary data for this study are the following: AWI-ESM-1-1-LR, BCC-CSM2-MR, BCC-ESM1, CESM2, CESM2-FV2, CESM2-WACCM, CESM2-WACCM-FV2, CNRM-CM6-1, CNRM-ESM2-1, E3SM-1-1, GFDL-CM4, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MPI-ESM-1-2-HAM, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MPI-ESM1-2-LR, MRI-ESM2-0,  and NorESM2-MM, SAM0-UNICON <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.34"><named-content content-type="pre">for further details on the water vapour in these models, see</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS5">
  <label>A5</label><title>Inter-model correlations</title>
      <p id="d1e1049">The circulation response to increased stratospheric water vapour above the Pacific in CMIP6 models is analysed statistically by using inter-model correlations. For that purpose, a Pacific H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O index is defined by averaging lowermost stratospheric water vapour in the Pacific region (140–220<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E longitude and 20–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitude, 150–70 hPa pressure) in each model. This index measures the strength of the Pacific moisture anomaly in different climate models and is correlated with circulation variables (zonal and meridional wind) across models. Hence, a negative correlation with meridional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind in the lower stratosphere above the Pacific (about 100–160<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, for instance, means that those models with higher water vapour mixing ratios in the Pacific UTLS simulate more negative, equatorward meridional wind in this region. Consequently, the eastern, equatorward flank of the monsoon anticyclonic circulation is strengthened in these models. Similar inter-model correlations have been used for analysing the westerly ducts in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1100">In addition, CMIP6 models are classified with respect to their horizontal and vertical resolution in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>e–f (with the<?pagebreak page2041?> information on model resolution taken from Keeble et al., 2021). For that reason, those models with more than 70 vertical levels are classified as models with relatively high vertical resolution (MPI-ESM1-2-HR, CESM2-WACCM, CESM2-WACCM-FV2, CNRM-CM6-1, CNRM-ESM2-1, E3SM-1-1, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MRI-ESM2-0), while those models with more than 150/280 longitude/latitude grid points are classified as models with relatively high horizontal resolution (MPI-ESM1-2-HR, CESM2-WACCM, CESM2, BCC-ESM1, GFDL-CM4, NorESM2-MM, SAM0-UNICON).</p>
      <p id="d1e1105">However, it is not necessarily the total number of levels or horizontal grid points but more likely the resolution in the tropopause region which matters for stratospheric water vapour. Therefore, the model classification discussed above only provides an indication that the model characteristics and processes involved in causing the bias are complex. For a thorough analysis of model resolution and diffusion effects, additional sensitivity simulations with a particular model but employing different horizontal and vertical resolutions as well as different transport schemes would be needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS6">
  <label>A6</label><title>Dynamical balances</title>
      <p id="d1e1116">The large-scale effects on atmospheric circulation from changes in stratospheric water vapour can be understood from simplified, balanced dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.35"/>, taking into account the radiative effect of water vapour on atmospheric temperatures. An increase in water vapour in the lowermost stratosphere causes local long-wave cooling and thereby modifies the atmospheric temperature gradients in that region. These changes in meridional and zonal temperature gradients, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are related via the thermal wind relation to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind velocities:
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>A1</label><mml:math id="M55" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          For instance, the decrease in the meridional temperature gradient below about 90 hPa above the Pacific (around 200<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b is related to an increase in the vertical gradient of zonal wind. Likewise, the increase in the meridional temperature gradient above is related to a decrease in the vertical zonal wind gradient. Hence, the increased water vapour in the Pacific lowermost stratosphere causes increased westerlies in that region and thereby strengthens the Pacific westerly ducts. Similar relations hold between the changes in the zonal temperature gradient and changes in the vertical gradient of meridional wind (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.E1"/>) such that negative meridional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-wind velocities further decrease around and above the tropopause in the Pacific (at about 130<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), implying a strengthened equatorward flow (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Consequently, increased lower-stratospheric water vapour above the Pacific is related to a strengthened equatorward flank on the eastern side of the monsoon anticyclone.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS7">
  <label>A7</label><title>Monsoon anticyclone diagnosis</title>
      <p id="d1e1301">Different diagnostics have been proposed in the literature for assessing strength and extend of the Asian monsoon anticyclone, based on either geopotential height or Montgomery stream function of potential vorticity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.36"/>. Due to data availability for the considered model simulations, we here use geopotential height anomaly as a measure for the anticyclonic circulation. In particular, we follow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.37"/> and diagnose the centre of the anticyclone as the location of maximum geopotential height on the 100 hPa isobaric surface. Longitude profiles at the latitude of the anticyclone centre are then used to compare the longitudinal extent of the upper-level anticyclonic monsoon circulation in different models (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).</p>
</sec>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1317">The EMAC and EMAC-CLaMS models are available in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) Git database. Detailed information is available at <uri>https://messy-interface.org/licence/application</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.38"/>. ERA5 reanalysis data are available from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (<uri>https://apps.ecmwf.int/data-catalogues/era5/?class=ea</uri>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="altparen.39"/>). The EMAC and EMAC-CLaMS model data used for this paper may be requested from the corresponding author (f.ploeger@fz-juelich.de). CMIP6 model data are publicly available at <uri>https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.40"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e1339">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2033-2024-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2033-2024-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1348">FP initiated the study, carried out the analysis, and wrote the manuscript. EC set up and carried out the model simulations and the data processing. TB and PK were strongly involved in several detailed discussions during different phases of the project. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1354">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e1363">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1370">We thank Nicole Thomas and Patrick Jöckel for support with setting up the model simulations. This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – TRR 301 – project ID 428312742. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the computing time for the CLaMS simulations which was granted on the supercomputer JURECA at the Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC) under the VSR project ID CLAMS-ESM.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e1375">The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Forschungszentrum Jülich.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1381">This paper was edited by Peter Haynes and Barbara Ervens   and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Banerjee et~al.(2019)Banerjee, Chiodo, Previdi, Ponater, Conley, and
Polvani}}?><label>Banerjee et al.(2019)Banerjee, Chiodo, Previdi, Ponater, Conley, and Polvani</label><?label Banerjee2019?><mixed-citation>Banerjee, A., Chiodo, G., Previdi, M., Ponater, M., Conley, A. J., and Polvani, L. M.: Stratospheric water vapor: an important climate feedback, Clim. Dynam., 53, 1432–0894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04721-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-019-04721-4</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bergman et~al.(2013)Bergman, Fierli, Jensen, Honomichl, and
Pan}}?><label>Bergman et al.(2013)Bergman, Fierli, Jensen, Honomichl, and Pan</label><?label Bergman2013?><mixed-citation>Bergman, J. W., Fierli, F., Jensen, E. J., Honomichl, S., and Pan, L. L.: Boundary layer sources for the Asian anticyclone: Regional contributions to a vertical conduit, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 2560–2575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50142</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brewer(1949)}}?><label>Brewer(1949)</label><?label Brewer1949?><mixed-citation>Brewer, A. W.: Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 75, 351–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49707532603</ext-link>, 1949.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Charlesworth et~al.(2023)Charlesworth, Ploeger, Birner, Baikhadzhaev,
Abalos, Abraham, Akiyoshi, Bekki, Dennison, J\"{o}ckel, Keeble, Kinnison,
Morgenstern, Plummer, Rozanov, Strode, Zeng, and Riese}}?><label>Charlesworth et al.(2023)Charlesworth, Ploeger, Birner, Baikhadzhaev, Abalos, Abraham, Akiyoshi, Bekki, Dennison, Jöckel, Keeble, Kinnison, Morgenstern, Plummer, Rozanov, Strode, Zeng, and Riese</label><?label Charlesworth2023?><mixed-citation>Charlesworth, E., Ploeger, F., Birner, T., Baikhadzhaev, R., Abalos, M., Abraham, L., Akiyoshi, H., Bekki, S., Dennison, F., Jöckel, P., Keeble, J., Kinnison, D., Morgenstern, O., Plummer, D., Rozanov, E., Strode, S., Zeng, G., and Riese, M.: Stratospheric water vapor affecting atmospheric circulation, Nat. Commun., 14, 3925, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39559-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-39559-2</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{ECMWF(2024)}?><label>ECMWF(2024)</label><?label ERA5?><mixed-citation>ECMWF: ERA5 reanalysis,    <uri>https://apps.ecmwf.int/data-catalogues/era5/?class=ea</uri>, last access: 12 February 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Charlesworth et~al.(2020)Charlesworth, Dugstad, Fritsch, J\"{o}ckel,
and Pl\"{o}ger}}?><label>Charlesworth et al.(2020)Charlesworth, Dugstad, Fritsch, Jöckel, and Plöger</label><?label Charlesworth2020?><mixed-citation>Charlesworth, E. J., Dugstad, A.-K., Fritsch, F., Jöckel, P., and Plöger, F.: Impact of Lagrangian transport on lower-stratospheric transport timescales in a climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15227–15245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15227-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-15227-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dessler et~al.(2013)Dessler, Schoeberl, Wang, Davis, and
Rosenlof}}?><label>Dessler et al.(2013)Dessler, Schoeberl, Wang, Davis, and Rosenlof</label><?label Dessler2013?><mixed-citation>Dessler, A., Schoeberl, M., Wang, T., Davis, S., and Rosenlof, K.: Stratospheric water vapor feedback, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 18087–18091, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310344110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1310344110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dessler et~al.(2016)Dessler, Ye, Wang, Schoeberl, Oman, Douglass,
Butler, Rosenlof, Davis, and Portmann}}?><label>Dessler et al.(2016)Dessler, Ye, Wang, Schoeberl, Oman, Douglass, Butler, Rosenlof, Davis, and Portmann</label><?label Dessler2016?><mixed-citation>Dessler, A., Ye, H., Wang, T., Schoeberl, M., Oman, L., Douglass, A., Butler, A., Rosenlof, K., Davis, S., and Portmann, R.: Transport of ice into the stratosphere and the humidification of the stratosphere over the 21st century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2323–2329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067991" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL067991</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fueglistaler et~al.(2005)Fueglistaler, Bonazzola, Haynes, and
Peter}}?><label>Fueglistaler et al.(2005)Fueglistaler, Bonazzola, Haynes, and Peter</label><?label Fueglistaler2005b?><mixed-citation>Fueglistaler, S., Bonazzola, M., Haynes, P. H., and Peter, T.: Stratospheric water vapor predicted from the Lagrangian temperature history of air entering the stratosphere in the tropics, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005516" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005516</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Garny and Randel(2013)}}?><label>Garny and Randel(2013)</label><?label Garny2013?><mixed-citation>Garny, H. and Randel, W. J.: Dynamic variability of the Asian monsoon anticyclone observed in potential vorticity and correlations with tracer distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 13421–13433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020908" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020908</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hersbach et~al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara,
Hor\`{a}nyi, Mu\~{n}oz Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons,
Soci, Abdalla, Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita,
De~Chiara, Dahlgren, Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes,
Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hogan, H\'{o}lm, Janiskov\`{a}, Keeley, Laloyaux,
Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti, de~Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and
Th\'{e}paut}}?><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara, Horànyi, Muñoz Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Abdalla, Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita, De Chiara, Dahlgren, Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hogan, Hólm, Janiskovà, Keeley, Laloyaux, Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti, de Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and Thépaut</label><?label Hersbach2020?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horànyi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janiskovà, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{ESGF(2024)}?><label>ESGF(2024)</label><?label ESGF?><mixed-citation>ESGF: CMIP6 – Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, <uri>https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6</uri>, last access: 12 February 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoor et~al.(2010)Hoor, Wernli, Hegglin, and Boenisch}}?><label>Hoor et al.(2010)Hoor, Wernli, Hegglin, and Boenisch</label><?label Hoor2010?><mixed-citation>Hoor, P., Wernli, H., Hegglin, M. I., and Bönisch, H.: Transport timescales and tracer properties in the extratropical UTLS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7929–7944, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7929-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-7929-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoppe et~al.(2014)Hoppe, Hoffmann, Konopka, Groo{\ss}, Ploeger,
G\"{u}nther, J\"{o}ckel, and M\"{u}ller}}?><label>Hoppe et al.(2014)Hoppe, Hoffmann, Konopka, Grooß, Ploeger, Günther, Jöckel, and Müller</label><?label Hoppe2014?><mixed-citation>Hoppe, C. M., Hoffmann, L., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Ploeger, F., Günther, G., Jöckel, P., and Müller, R.: The implementation of the CLaMS Lagrangian transport core into the chemistry climate model EMAC 2.40.1: application on age of air and transport of long-lived trace species, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2639–2651, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2639-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-2639-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{James et~al.(2008)James, Bonazzola, Legras, Surbled, and
Fueglistaler}}?><label>James et al.(2008)James, Bonazzola, Legras, Surbled, and Fueglistaler</label><?label James2008?><mixed-citation>James, R., Bonazzola, M., Legras, B., Surbled, K., and Fueglistaler, S.: Water vapor transport and dehydration above convective outflow during Asian monsoon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035441" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL035441</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{J\"{o}ckel et~al.(2016)J\"{o}ckel, Tost, Pozzer, Kunze, Kirner,
Brenninkmeijer, Brinkop, Duy, Dyroff, Eckstein, Frank, Garny, Gottschaldt,
Graf, Grewe, Kerkweg, Kern, Matthes, Mertens, Meul, Neumaier, N\"{u}tzel,
Oberl\"{a}nder-Hayn, Ruhnke, Runde, Sander, Scharffe, and Zahn}}?><label>Jöckel et al.(2016)Jöckel, Tost, Pozzer, Kunze, Kirner, Brenninkmeijer, Brinkop, Duy, Dyroff, Eckstein, Frank, Garny, Gottschaldt, Graf, Grewe, Kerkweg, Kern, Matthes, Mertens, Meul, Neumaier, Nützel, Oberländer-Hayn, Ruhnke, Runde, Sander, Scharffe, and Zahn</label><?label Joeckel2016?><mixed-citation>Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F., Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B., Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S., Neumaier, M., Nützel, M., Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R., Scharffe, D., and Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1153–1200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Keeble et~al.(2021)Keeble, Hassler, Banerjee, Checa-Garcia, Chiodo,
Davis, Eyring, Griffiths, Morgenstern, Nowack, Zeng, Zhang, Bodeker, Burrows,
Cameron-Smith, Cugnet, Danek, Deushi, Horowitz, Kubin, Li, Lohmann, Michou,
Mills, Nabat, Olivi\'{e}, Park, Seland, Stoll, Wieners, and Wu}}?><label>Keeble et al.(2021)Keeble, Hassler, Banerjee, Checa-Garcia, Chiodo, Davis, Eyring, Griffiths, Morgenstern, Nowack, Zeng, Zhang, Bodeker, Burrows, Cameron-Smith, Cugnet, Danek, Deushi, Horowitz, Kubin, Li, Lohmann, Michou, Mills, Nabat, Olivié, Park, Seland, Stoll, Wieners, and Wu</label><?label Keeble2021?><mixed-citation>Keeble, J., Hassler, B., Banerjee, A., Checa-Garcia, R., Chiodo, G., Davis, S., Eyring, V., Griffiths, P. T., Morgenstern, O., Nowack, P., Zeng, G., Zhang, J., Bodeker, G., Burrows, S., Cameron-Smith, P., Cugnet, D., Danek, C., Deushi, M., Horowitz, L. W., Kubin, A., Li, L., Lohmann, G., Michou, M., Mills, M. J., Nabat, P., Olivié, D., Park, S., Seland, Ø., Stoll, J., Wieners, K.-H., and Wu, T.: Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5015–5061, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5015-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-5015-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Konopka et~al.(2022)Konopka, Tao, Ploeger, Hurst, Santee, Wright, and
Riese}}?><label>Konopka et al.(2022)Konopka, Tao, Ploeger, Hurst, Santee, Wright, and Riese</label><?label Konopka2022?><mixed-citation>Konopka, P., Tao, M., Ploeger, F., Hurst, D. F., Santee, M. L., Wright, J. S., and Riese, M.: Stratospheric Moistening After 2000, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097609, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097609" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL097609</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Legras and Bucci(2020)}}?><label>Legras and Bucci(2020)</label><?label Legras2020?><mixed-citation>Legras, B. and Bucci, S.: Confinement of air in the Asian monsoon anticyclone and pathways of convective air to the stratosphere during the summer season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11045–11064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11045-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11045-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2043?><ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Li} and {Newman}(2020)}}?><label>Li and Newman(2020)</label><?label Li2020?><mixed-citation>Li, F. and Newman, P.: Stratospheric water vapor feedback and its climate impacts in the coupled atmosphere-ocean Goddard Earth Observing System Chemistry-Climate Model, Clim. Dynam., 55, 1585–1595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05348-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-020-05348-6</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Modular Earth Submodel System(2024)}?><label>Modular Earth Submodel System(2024)</label><?label messy?><mixed-citation>Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy): Licence Application, <uri>https://messy-interface.org/licence/application</uri>, last access: 12 February 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nowack et~al.(2023)Nowack, Ceppi, Davis, Chiodo, Ball, Diallo, Hassler, Jia, Keeble, and Joshi}}?><label>Nowack et al.(2023)Nowack, Ceppi, Davis, Chiodo, Ball, Diallo, Hassler, Jia, Keeble, and Joshi</label><?label Nowack2023?><mixed-citation>Nowack, P., Ceppi, P., Davis, S. M., Chiodo, G., Ball, W., Diallo, M. A., Hassler, B., Jia, Y., Keeble, J., and Joshi, M.: Response of stratospheric water vapour to warming constrained by satellite observations, Nat. Geosci., 16, 577–583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01183-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-023-01183-6</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{N\"{u}tzel et~al.(2019)N\"{u}tzel, Podglajen, Garny, and
Ploeger}}?><label>Nützel et al.(2019)Nützel, Podglajen, Garny, and Ploeger</label><?label Nuetzel2019?><mixed-citation>Nützel, M., Podglajen, A., Garny, H., and Ploeger, F.: Quantification of water vapour transport from the Asian monsoon to the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8947–8966, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8947-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8947-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Park et~al.(2009)Park, Randel, Emmons, and Livesey}}?><label>Park et al.(2009)Park, Randel, Emmons, and Livesey</label><?label Park2009?><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., and Livesey, N. J.: Transport pathways of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model of Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART), J. Geophys. Res., 114, D08303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010621</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Plaza et~al.(2021)Plaza, Podglajen, Pe\~{n}a Ortiz, and
Ploeger}}?><label>Plaza et al.(2021)Plaza, Podglajen, Peña Ortiz, and Ploeger</label><?label Plaza2021?><mixed-citation>Plaza, N. P., Podglajen, A., Peña-Ortiz, C., and Ploeger, F.: Processes influencing lower stratospheric water vapour in monsoon anticyclones: insights from Lagrangian modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9585–9607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9585-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-9585-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ploeger et~al.(2013)Ploeger, G\"{u}nther, Konopka, Fueglistaler,
M\"{u}ller, Hoppe, Kunz, Spang, Groo{\ss}, and Riese}}?><label>Ploeger et al.(2013)Ploeger, Günther, Konopka, Fueglistaler, Müller, Hoppe, Kunz, Spang, Grooß, and Riese</label><?label Ploeger2013?><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Günther, G., Konopka, P., Fueglistaler, S., Müller, R., Hoppe, C., Kunz, A., Spang, R., Grooß, J.-U., and Riese, M.: Horizontal water vapor transport in the lower stratosphere from subtropics to high latitudes during boreal summer, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 8111–8127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50636" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50636</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ploeger et~al.(2015)Ploeger, Gottschling, Grie{\ss}bach, Groo{\ss},
G\"{u}nther, Konopka, M\"{u}ller, Riese, Stroh, Tao, Ungermann, Vogel, and von
Hobe}}?><label>Ploeger et al.(2015)Ploeger, Gottschling, Grießbach, Grooß, Günther, Konopka, Müller, Riese, Stroh, Tao, Ungermann, Vogel, and von Hobe</label><?label Ploeger2015c?><mixed-citation>Ploeger, F., Gottschling, C., Griessbach, S., Grooß, J.-U., Guenther, G., Konopka, P., Müller, R., Riese, M., Stroh, F., Tao, M., Ungermann, J., Vogel, B., and von Hobe, M.: A potential vorticity-based determination of the transport barrier in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13145–13159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Randel and Park(2006)}}?><label>Randel and Park(2006)</label><?label Randel2006a?><mixed-citation>Randel, W. J. and Park, M.: Deep convective influence on the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone and associated tracer variability observed with Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006490" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006490</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Read et~al.(2007)Read, Lambert, Bacmeister, Cofield, Christensen,
Cuddy, Daffer, Drouin, Fetzer, Froidevaux, Fuller, Herman, Jarnot, Jiang,
Jiang, Kelly, Knosp, J.Kovalenko, Livesey, Liu, Manney, Pickett, Pumphrey,
Rosenlof, Sabounchi, Santee, Schwartz, Snyder, Stek, Su, Takacs, Thurstans,
Voemel, Wagner, Waters, Webster, Weinstock, and Wu}}?><label>Read et al.(2007)Read, Lambert, Bacmeister, Cofield, Christensen, Cuddy, Daffer, Drouin, Fetzer, Froidevaux, Fuller, Herman, Jarnot, Jiang, Jiang, Kelly, Knosp, J.Kovalenko, Livesey, Liu, Manney, Pickett, Pumphrey, Rosenlof, Sabounchi, Santee, Schwartz, Snyder, Stek, Su, Takacs, Thurstans, Voemel, Wagner, Waters, Webster, Weinstock, and Wu</label><?label Read2007?><mixed-citation>Read, W. G., Lambert, A., Bacmeister, J., Cofield, R. E., Christensen, L. E., Cuddy, D. T., Daffer, W. H., Drouin, B. J., Fetzer, E., Froidevaux, L., Fuller, R., Herman, R., Jarnot, R. F., Jiang, J. H., Jiang, Y., Kelly, K., Knosp, B. W., J.Kovalenko, L., Livesey, N. J., Liu, H.-C., Manney, G. L., Pickett, H. M., Pumphrey, H. C., Rosenlof, K. H., Sabounchi, X., Santee, M. L., Schwartz, M. J., Snyder, W. V., Stek, P., Su, H., Takacs, L. L., Thurstans, R. P., Voemel, H., Wagner, P. A., Waters, J. W., Webster, C. R., Weinstock, E. M., and Wu, D. L.: Aura Microwave Limb Sounder upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and relative humidity with respect to ice validation, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008752</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rolf et~al.(2018)Rolf, Vogel, Hoor, Afchine, G{\"{u}}nther, Kr{\"{a}}mer,
M{\"{u}}ller, M{\"{u}}ller, Spelten, and Riese}}?><label>Rolf et al.(2018)Rolf, Vogel, Hoor, Afchine, Günther, Krämer, Müller, Müller, Spelten, and Riese</label><?label Rolf2018?><mixed-citation>Rolf, C., Vogel, B., Hoor, P., Afchine, A., Günther, G., Krämer, M., Müller, R., Müller, S., Spelten, N., and Riese, M.: Water vapor increase in the lower stratosphere of the Northern Hemisphere due to the Asian monsoon anticyclone observed during the TACTS/ESMVal campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2973–2983, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2973-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2973-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Santee et~al.(2017)Santee, Manney, Livesey, Schwartz, Neu, and
Read}}?><label>Santee et al.(2017)Santee, Manney, Livesey, Schwartz, Neu, and Read</label><?label Santee2017?><mixed-citation>Santee, M. L., Manney, G. L., Livesey, N. J., Schwartz, M. J., Neu, J. L., and Read, W. G.: A comprehensive overview of the climatological composition of the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone based on 10 years of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 5491–5514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD026408</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schoeberl et~al.(2013)Schoeberl, Dessler, and Wang}}?><label>Schoeberl et al.(2013)Schoeberl, Dessler, and Wang</label><?label Schoeberl2013?><mixed-citation>Schoeberl, M. R., Dessler, A. E., and Wang, T.: Modeling upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric water vapor anomalies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7783–7793, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7783-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7783-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Smith et~al.(2022)Smith, Bushell, Butchart, Haynes, and
Maycock}}?><label>Smith et al.(2022)Smith, Bushell, Butchart, Haynes, and Maycock</label><?label Smith2022?><mixed-citation>Smith, J. W., Bushell, A. C., Butchart, N., Haynes, P. H., and Maycock, A. C.: The Effect of Convective Injection of Ice on Stratospheric Water Vapor in a Changing Climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL097386</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Solomon et~al.(2010)Solomon, Rosenlof, Portmann, Daniel, Davis,
Sanford, and Plattner}}?><label>Solomon et al.(2010)Solomon, Rosenlof, Portmann, Daniel, Davis, Sanford, and Plattner</label><?label Solomon2010?><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Rosenlof, K., Portmann, R., Daniel, J., Davis, S., Sanford, T., and Plattner, G.-K.: Contributions of stratospheric water vapor to decadal changes in the rate of global warming, Science, 327, 1219–1223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182488" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1182488</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stenke et~al.(2009)Stenke, Dameris, Grewe, and Garny}}?><label>Stenke et al.(2009)Stenke, Dameris, Grewe, and Garny</label><?label Stenke2009?><mixed-citation>Stenke, A., Dameris, M., Grewe, V., and Garny, H.: Implications of Lagrangian transport for simulations with a coupled chemistry-climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5489–5504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5489-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5489-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tao et~al.(2023)Tao, Konopka, Wright, Liu, Bian, Davis, Jia, and Ploeger}}?><label>Tao et al.(2023)Tao, Konopka, Wright, Liu, Bian, Davis, Jia, and Ploeger</label><?label Tao2023?><mixed-citation>Tao, M., Konopka, P., Wright, J. S., Liu, Y., Bian, J., Davis, S., Jia, Y., and Ploeger, F.: Multi-decadal variability controls short-term stratospheric water vapor trends, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 2662–4435, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01094-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-023-01094-9</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{von Hobe et~al.(2021)von Hobe, Ploeger, Konopka, Kloss, Ulanowski,
Yushkov, Ravegnani, Volk, Pan, Honomichl, Tilmes, Kinnison, Garcia, and
Wright}}?><label>von Hobe et al.(2021)von Hobe, Ploeger, Konopka, Kloss, Ulanowski, Yushkov, Ravegnani, Volk, Pan, Honomichl, Tilmes, Kinnison, Garcia, and Wright</label><?label Hobe2021?><mixed-citation>von Hobe, M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Kloss, C., Ulanowski, A., Yushkov, V., Ravegnani, F., Volk, C. M., Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Tilmes, S., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., and Wright, J. S.: Upward transport into and within the Asian monsoon anticyclone as inferred from StratoClim trace gas observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1267–1285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2018)Wang, Wu, Tung, Richter, Glanville, Tilmes, Orbe,
Huang, Xia, and Kinnison}}?><label>Wang et al.(2018)Wang, Wu, Tung, Richter, Glanville, Tilmes, Orbe, Huang, Xia, and Kinnison</label><?label Wang2018?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Wu, Y., Tung, W., Richter, J. H., Glanville, A. A., Tilmes, S., Orbe, C., Huang, Y., Xia, Y., and Kinnison, D. E.: The Simulation of Stratospheric Water Vapor Over the Asian Summer Monsoon in CESM1(WACCM) Models, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 11377–11391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028971" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD028971</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Waugh and Polvani(2000)}}?><label>Waugh and Polvani(2000)</label><?label Waugh2000?><mixed-citation> Waugh, D. W. and Polvani, L. M.: Climatology of intrusions into the tropical upper troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3857–3860, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Webster and Holton(1982)}}?><label>Webster and Holton(1982)</label><?label Webster1982?><mixed-citation> Webster, P. J. and Holton, J. R.: Cross-equatorial response to middle-latitude forcing in a zonally varying basic state, jas, 39, 722–733, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wright et~al.(2011)Wright, Fu, Fueglistaler, Liu, and
Zhang}}?><label>Wright et al.(2011)Wright, Fu, Fueglistaler, Liu, and Zhang</label><?label Wright2011?><mixed-citation>Wright, J. S., Fu, R., Fueglistaler, S., Liu, Y. S., and Zhang, Y.: The influence of summertime convection over Southeast Asia on water vapor in the tropical stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015416</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yan et~al.(2021)Yan, Konopka, Hauck, Podglajen, and
Ploeger}}?><label>Yan et al.(2021)Yan, Konopka, Hauck, Podglajen, and Ploeger</label><?label Yan2021?><mixed-citation>Yan, X., Konopka, P., Hauck, M., Podglajen, A., and Ploeger, F.: Asymmetry and pathways of inter-hemispheric transport in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6627–6645, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6627-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6627-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Moist bias in the Pacific upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) in climate models affects regional circulation patterns</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Banerjee et al.(2019)Banerjee, Chiodo, Previdi, Ponater, Conley, and
Polvani</label><mixed-citation>
      
Banerjee, A., Chiodo, G., Previdi, M., Ponater, M., Conley, A. J., and Polvani,
L. M.: Stratospheric water vapor: an important climate feedback, Clim. Dynam.,
53, 1432–0894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04721-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04721-4</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bergman et al.(2013)Bergman, Fierli, Jensen, Honomichl, and
Pan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bergman, J. W., Fierli, F., Jensen, E. J., Honomichl, S., and Pan, L. L.:
Boundary layer sources for the Asian anticyclone: Regional contributions to
a vertical conduit, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 2560–2575,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50142</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Brewer(1949)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brewer, A. W.: Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of
helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 75, 351–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603</a>, 1949.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Charlesworth et al.(2023)Charlesworth, Ploeger, Birner, Baikhadzhaev,
Abalos, Abraham, Akiyoshi, Bekki, Dennison, Jöckel, Keeble, Kinnison,
Morgenstern, Plummer, Rozanov, Strode, Zeng, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Charlesworth, E., Ploeger, F., Birner, T., Baikhadzhaev, R., Abalos, M.,
Abraham, L., Akiyoshi, H., Bekki, S., Dennison, F., Jöckel, P., Keeble, J.,
Kinnison, D., Morgenstern, O., Plummer, D., Rozanov, E., Strode, S., Zeng,
G., and Riese, M.: Stratospheric water vapor affecting atmospheric
circulation, Nat. Commun., 14, 3925, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39559-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39559-2</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>ECMWF(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
ECMWF: ERA5 reanalysis,    <a href="https://apps.ecmwf.int/data-catalogues/era5/?class=ea" target="_blank"/>, last access: 12 February 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Charlesworth et al.(2020)Charlesworth, Dugstad, Fritsch, Jöckel,
and Plöger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Charlesworth, E. J., Dugstad, A.-K., Fritsch, F., Jöckel, P., and Plöger, F.: Impact of Lagrangian transport on lower-stratospheric transport timescales in a climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15227–15245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15227-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15227-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Dessler et al.(2013)Dessler, Schoeberl, Wang, Davis, and
Rosenlof</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dessler, A., Schoeberl, M., Wang, T., Davis, S., and Rosenlof, K.:
Stratospheric water vapor feedback, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 18087–18091, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310344110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310344110</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Dessler et al.(2016)Dessler, Ye, Wang, Schoeberl, Oman, Douglass,
Butler, Rosenlof, Davis, and Portmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dessler, A., Ye, H., Wang, T., Schoeberl, M., Oman, L., Douglass, A., Butler,
A., Rosenlof, K., Davis, S., and Portmann, R.: Transport of ice into the
stratosphere and the humidification of the stratosphere over the 21st
century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2323–2329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067991" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067991</a>,
2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Fueglistaler et al.(2005)Fueglistaler, Bonazzola, Haynes, and
Peter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fueglistaler, S., Bonazzola, M., Haynes, P. H., and Peter, T.: Stratospheric
water vapor predicted from the Lagrangian temperature history of air
entering the stratosphere in the tropics, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08107,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005516" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005516</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Garny and Randel(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garny, H. and Randel, W. J.: Dynamic variability of the Asian monsoon
anticyclone observed in potential vorticity and correlations with tracer
distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 13421–13433,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020908" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020908</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara,
Horànyi, Muñoz Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons,
Soci, Abdalla, Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita,
De Chiara, Dahlgren, Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes,
Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hogan, Hólm, Janiskovà, Keeley, Laloyaux,
Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti, de Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and
Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horànyi, A.,
Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janiskovà, M.,
Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>ESGF(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
ESGF: CMIP6 – Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, <a href="https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6" target="_blank"/>, last access: 12 February 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Hoor et al.(2010)Hoor, Wernli, Hegglin, and Boenisch</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoor, P., Wernli, H., Hegglin, M. I., and Bönisch, H.: Transport timescales and tracer properties in the extratropical UTLS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7929–7944, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7929-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7929-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Hoppe et al.(2014)Hoppe, Hoffmann, Konopka, Grooß, Ploeger,
Günther, Jöckel, and Müller</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoppe, C. M., Hoffmann, L., Konopka, P., Grooß, J.-U., Ploeger, F., Günther, G., Jöckel, P., and Müller, R.: The implementation of the CLaMS Lagrangian transport core into the chemistry climate model EMAC 2.40.1: application on age of air and transport of long-lived trace species, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2639–2651, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2639-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2639-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>James et al.(2008)James, Bonazzola, Legras, Surbled, and
Fueglistaler</label><mixed-citation>
      
James, R., Bonazzola, M., Legras, B., Surbled, K., and Fueglistaler, S.: Water
vapor transport and dehydration above convective outflow during Asian
monsoon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035441" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035441</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Jöckel et al.(2016)Jöckel, Tost, Pozzer, Kunze, Kirner,
Brenninkmeijer, Brinkop, Duy, Dyroff, Eckstein, Frank, Garny, Gottschaldt,
Graf, Grewe, Kerkweg, Kern, Matthes, Mertens, Meul, Neumaier, Nützel,
Oberländer-Hayn, Ruhnke, Runde, Sander, Scharffe, and Zahn</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F., Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B., Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S., Neumaier, M., Nützel, M., Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R., Scharffe, D., and Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1153–1200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Keeble et al.(2021)Keeble, Hassler, Banerjee, Checa-Garcia, Chiodo,
Davis, Eyring, Griffiths, Morgenstern, Nowack, Zeng, Zhang, Bodeker, Burrows,
Cameron-Smith, Cugnet, Danek, Deushi, Horowitz, Kubin, Li, Lohmann, Michou,
Mills, Nabat, Olivié, Park, Seland, Stoll, Wieners, and Wu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keeble, J., Hassler, B., Banerjee, A., Checa-Garcia, R., Chiodo, G., Davis, S., Eyring, V., Griffiths, P. T., Morgenstern, O., Nowack, P., Zeng, G., Zhang, J., Bodeker, G., Burrows, S., Cameron-Smith, P., Cugnet, D., Danek, C., Deushi, M., Horowitz, L. W., Kubin, A., Li, L., Lohmann, G., Michou, M., Mills, M. J., Nabat, P., Olivié, D., Park, S., Seland, Ø., Stoll, J., Wieners, K.-H., and Wu, T.: Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5015–5061, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5015-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5015-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Konopka et al.(2022)Konopka, Tao, Ploeger, Hurst, Santee, Wright, and
Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Konopka, P., Tao, M., Ploeger, F., Hurst, D. F., Santee, M. L., Wright, J. S.,
and Riese, M.: Stratospheric Moistening After 2000, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097609, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097609" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097609</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Legras and Bucci(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Legras, B. and Bucci, S.: Confinement of air in the Asian monsoon anticyclone and pathways of convective air to the stratosphere during the summer season, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11045–11064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11045-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11045-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Li and Newman(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, F. and Newman, P.: Stratospheric water vapor feedback and its climate
impacts in the coupled atmosphere-ocean Goddard Earth Observing System
Chemistry-Climate Model, Clim. Dynam., 55, 1585–1595,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05348-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05348-6</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Modular Earth Submodel System(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy): Licence Application, <a href="https://messy-interface.org/licence/application" target="_blank"/>, last access: 12 February 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Nowack et al.(2023)Nowack, Ceppi, Davis, Chiodo, Ball, Diallo, Hassler, Jia, Keeble, and Joshi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nowack, P., Ceppi, P., Davis, S. M., Chiodo, G., Ball, W.,
Diallo, M. A., Hassler, B., Jia, Y., Keeble, J., and Joshi, M.:
Response of stratospheric water vapour to warming constrained by satellite
observations, Nat. Geosci., 16, 577–583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01183-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01183-6</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Nützel et al.(2019)Nützel, Podglajen, Garny, and
Ploeger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nützel, M., Podglajen, A., Garny, H., and Ploeger, F.: Quantification of water vapour transport from the Asian monsoon to the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8947–8966, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8947-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8947-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Park et al.(2009)Park, Randel, Emmons, and Livesey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Park, M., Randel, W. J., Emmons, L. K., and Livesey, N. J.: Transport pathways
of carbon monoxide in the Asian summer monsoon diagnosed from Model of
Ozone and Related Tracers (MOZART), J. Geophys. Res., 114, D08303,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010621" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010621</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Plaza et al.(2021)Plaza, Podglajen, Peña Ortiz, and
Ploeger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plaza, N. P., Podglajen, A., Peña-Ortiz, C., and Ploeger, F.: Processes influencing lower stratospheric water vapour in monsoon anticyclones: insights from Lagrangian modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9585–9607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9585-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9585-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Ploeger et al.(2013)Ploeger, Günther, Konopka, Fueglistaler,
Müller, Hoppe, Kunz, Spang, Grooß, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ploeger, F., Günther, G., Konopka, P., Fueglistaler, S., Müller, R., Hoppe,
C., Kunz, A., Spang, R., Grooß, J.-U., and Riese, M.: Horizontal water
vapor transport in the lower stratosphere from subtropics to high latitudes
during boreal summer, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 8111–8127,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50636" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50636</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Ploeger et al.(2015)Ploeger, Gottschling, Grießbach, Grooß,
Günther, Konopka, Müller, Riese, Stroh, Tao, Ungermann, Vogel, and von
Hobe</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ploeger, F., Gottschling, C., Griessbach, S., Grooß, J.-U., Guenther, G., Konopka, P., Müller, R., Riese, M., Stroh, F., Tao, M., Ungermann, J., Vogel, B., and von Hobe, M.: A potential vorticity-based determination of the transport barrier in the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13145–13159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13145-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Randel and Park(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Randel, W. J. and Park, M.: Deep convective influence on the Asian summer
monsoon anticyclone and associated tracer variability observed with
Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12314,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006490" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006490</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Read et al.(2007)Read, Lambert, Bacmeister, Cofield, Christensen,
Cuddy, Daffer, Drouin, Fetzer, Froidevaux, Fuller, Herman, Jarnot, Jiang,
Jiang, Kelly, Knosp, J.Kovalenko, Livesey, Liu, Manney, Pickett, Pumphrey,
Rosenlof, Sabounchi, Santee, Schwartz, Snyder, Stek, Su, Takacs, Thurstans,
Voemel, Wagner, Waters, Webster, Weinstock, and Wu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Read, W. G., Lambert, A., Bacmeister, J., Cofield, R. E., Christensen, L. E.,
Cuddy, D. T., Daffer, W. H., Drouin, B. J., Fetzer, E., Froidevaux, L.,
Fuller, R., Herman, R., Jarnot, R. F., Jiang, J. H., Jiang, Y., Kelly, K.,
Knosp, B. W., J.Kovalenko, L., Livesey, N. J., Liu, H.-C., Manney, G. L.,
Pickett, H. M., Pumphrey, H. C., Rosenlof, K. H., Sabounchi, X., Santee,
M. L., Schwartz, M. J., Snyder, W. V., Stek, P., Su, H., Takacs, L. L.,
Thurstans, R. P., Voemel, H., Wagner, P. A., Waters, J. W., Webster, C. R.,
Weinstock, E. M., and Wu, D. L.: Aura Microwave Limb Sounder upper
tropospheric and lower stratospheric H<sub>2</sub>O and relative humidity with
respect to ice validation, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S35,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008752" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008752</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Rolf et al.(2018)Rolf, Vogel, Hoor, Afchine, Günther, Krämer,
Müller, Müller, Spelten, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rolf, C., Vogel, B., Hoor, P., Afchine, A., Günther, G., Krämer, M., Müller, R., Müller, S., Spelten, N., and Riese, M.: Water vapor increase in the lower stratosphere of the Northern Hemisphere due to the Asian monsoon anticyclone observed during the TACTS/ESMVal campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2973–2983, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2973-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2973-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Santee et al.(2017)Santee, Manney, Livesey, Schwartz, Neu, and
Read</label><mixed-citation>
      
Santee, M. L., Manney, G. L., Livesey, N. J., Schwartz, M. J., Neu, J. L., and
Read, W. G.: A comprehensive overview of the climatological composition of
the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone based on 10 years of Aura Microwave Limb
Sounder measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 5491–5514,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026408</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Schoeberl et al.(2013)Schoeberl, Dessler, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schoeberl, M. R., Dessler, A. E., and Wang, T.: Modeling upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric water vapor anomalies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7783–7793, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7783-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7783-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Smith et al.(2022)Smith, Bushell, Butchart, Haynes, and
Maycock</label><mixed-citation>
      
Smith, J. W., Bushell, A. C., Butchart, N., Haynes, P. H., and Maycock, A. C.:
The Effect of Convective Injection of Ice on Stratospheric Water Vapor in a
Changing Climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097386</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Solomon et al.(2010)Solomon, Rosenlof, Portmann, Daniel, Davis,
Sanford, and Plattner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Solomon, S., Rosenlof, K., Portmann, R., Daniel, J., Davis, S., Sanford, T.,
and Plattner, G.-K.: Contributions of stratospheric water vapor to decadal
changes in the rate of global warming, Science, 327, 1219–1223,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182488" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182488</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Stenke et al.(2009)Stenke, Dameris, Grewe, and Garny</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stenke, A., Dameris, M., Grewe, V., and Garny, H.: Implications of Lagrangian transport for simulations with a coupled chemistry-climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5489–5504, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5489-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5489-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Tao et al.(2023)Tao, Konopka, Wright, Liu, Bian, Davis, Jia, and Ploeger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, M., Konopka, P., Wright, J. S., Liu, Y., Bian, J., Davis, S., Jia, Y., and Ploeger, F.: Multi-decadal variability controls short-term stratospheric water vapor trends, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 2662–4435,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01094-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01094-9</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>von Hobe et al.(2021)von Hobe, Ploeger, Konopka, Kloss, Ulanowski,
Yushkov, Ravegnani, Volk, Pan, Honomichl, Tilmes, Kinnison, Garcia, and
Wright</label><mixed-citation>
      
von Hobe, M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Kloss, C., Ulanowski, A., Yushkov, V., Ravegnani, F., Volk, C. M., Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S. B., Tilmes, S., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., and Wright, J. S.: Upward transport into and within the Asian monsoon anticyclone as inferred from StratoClim trace gas observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1267–1285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Wang et al.(2018)Wang, Wu, Tung, Richter, Glanville, Tilmes, Orbe,
Huang, Xia, and Kinnison</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, X., Wu, Y., Tung, W., Richter, J. H., Glanville, A. A., Tilmes, S., Orbe,
C., Huang, Y., Xia, Y., and Kinnison, D. E.: The Simulation of Stratospheric
Water Vapor Over the Asian Summer Monsoon in CESM1(WACCM) Models,
J. Geophys. Res., 123, 11377–11391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028971" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028971</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Waugh and Polvani(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Waugh, D. W. and Polvani, L. M.: Climatology of intrusions into the tropical
upper troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3857–3860, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Webster and Holton(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Webster, P. J. and Holton, J. R.: Cross-equatorial response to middle-latitude
forcing in a zonally varying basic state, jas, 39, 722–733, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Wright et al.(2011)Wright, Fu, Fueglistaler, Liu, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wright, J. S., Fu, R., Fueglistaler, S., Liu, Y. S., and Zhang, Y.: The
influence of summertime convection over Southeast Asia on water vapor in
the tropical stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015416" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015416</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Yan et al.(2021)Yan, Konopka, Hauck, Podglajen, and
Ploeger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yan, X., Konopka, P., Hauck, M., Podglajen, A., and Ploeger, F.: Asymmetry and pathways of inter-hemispheric transport in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6627–6645, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6627-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6627-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
