<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-24-1607-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>What caused large ozone variabilities in three megacity clusters in eastern China during 2015–2020?</article-title><alt-title>What caused ozone variabilities in eastern China during 2015–2020?</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{What caused ozone variabilities in eastern China during 2015--2020?}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T. Hu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Tingting</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Yu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Run</given-names></name>
          <email>liurun@jnu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-1354</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Yuepeng</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5040-9707</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ouyang</surname><given-names>Shanshan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Boguang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yuanhang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Shaw Chen</given-names></name>
          <email>shawliu@jnu.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 511443, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Quality, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 511443, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Run Liu (liurun@jnu.edu.cn) and Shaw Chen Liu (shawliu@jnu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>February</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1607</fpage><lpage>1626</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>May</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>November</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>December</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e162">Due to a robust emission control policy, significant reductions in major air pollutants, such as PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO, were observed in China between 2015 and 2020. On the other hand, during the same period, there was a notable increase in ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations, making it a prominent air pollutant in eastern China. The annual mean concentration of maximum daily 8 h average (MDA8) O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited alarming linear increases of 2.4, 1.1, and 2.0 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb is for parts per billion) in three megacity clusters: Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and the Pearl River Delta (PRD), respectively. Meanwhile, there was a significant 3-fold increase in the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days, defined as MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 ppb. Our analysis indicated that the upward increases in the annual mean concentration of MDA8 were primarily driven by the rise in consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days. There were expansions of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in urban centers to rural areas accompanied by a saturation effect so that MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in 2015 remained nearly constant at 100 ppb. Last, we found a close association between O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days and the position and strength of tropical cyclones (TCs) in the northwest Pacific and the West Pacific subtropical high (WPSH). The TC and WPSH contributed to meteorological conditions characterized by clear skies, subsiding air motion, high vertical stability in the lower troposphere, increased solar radiation, and a positive temperature anomaly at the surface. These favorable meteorological conditions greatly facilitated the formation of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, we propose that the worsening O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases observed in the BTH, YRD, and PRD regions from 2015 to 2020 can be mostly attributed to enhanced photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production resulting from an increased occurrence of meteorological conditions with high solar radiation and positive temperature anomalies under the influence of the WPSH and TCs.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>92044302</award-id>
<award-id>41805115</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project</funding-source>
<award-id>202002020065</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Special Fund Project for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy of Guangdong Province</funding-source>
<award-id>2019B121205004</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program</funding-source>
<award-id>2016ZT06N263</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2018YFC0213906</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page1608?><p id="d1e340">Ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is an important greenhouse gas, which can also have adverse effects on human health, vegetation, and a variety of materials (Bell et al., 2006; Cohen et al., 2017; Kalabokas et al., 2020; Nuvolone et al., 2018). Surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a secondary pollutant produced by photochemical reactions involving O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Ma et al., 2012; Monks et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017). In addition to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors, meteorological conditions are also crucial factors driving the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. Solar radiation, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and cloud cover have been found to be closely related to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (Dong et al., 2020; Han et al., 2020; Yin et al., 2019). Furthermore, large-scale circulations, such as the East Asian monsoon, West Pacific subtropical high (WPSH), and tropical cyclones (TCs) can influence O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration as well (Lu et al., 2019; Rowlinson et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2014; Zhao and Wang, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e418">The concentrations of air pollutants SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in China have been significantly reduced since 2013 (M. Li et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022; Zhai et al., 2019), thanks to the implementation of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan. However, the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration has dramatically increased and emerged as a major air pollutant in eastern China (Bian et al., 2019; Fu et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2018). O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are particularly high in the three megacity clusters in eastern China, namely Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and the Pearl River Delta (PRD) (Gao et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2019; K. Li et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e478">Annual mean concentrations of maximum daily 8 h average (MDA8) O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the three megacity clusters are shown in Fig. 1. The linear increases in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the BTH, YRD, and PRD regions are 2.4, 1.1, and 2.0 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (ppb is for parts per billion), respectively, during the period 2015–2020. These increases are unusually large, compared to the increases in other parts of China, as well as the positive trends worldwide (Chen et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2018; Professional Committee of Ozone Pollution Control of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, 2022; Zhang et al., 2020). Thus, a crucial scientific question is as follows: what causes these large increases in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration? Some recent studies suggested that changing photochemical processes induced by anthropogenic emissions are responsible for these increases (Li et al., 2019, 2022; Shao et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020). However, in our analysis of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases at individual stations in eastern China during the period 2015–2020, we noticed that the interannual variations in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration were strongly affected by the position and intensity of the WPSH and the presence of TCs in the western Pacific and South China Sea, consistent with the results of a number of recent studies (Chang et al., 2019; Mao et al., 2020; Ouyang et al., 2022; Zhao and Wang, 2017). These results suggest that transport or meteorological parameters associated with the WPSH and TCs may also play an important role in the large increases in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e551">Annual mean concentrations of maximum daily 8 h average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the BTH (green), YRD (red), and PRD (black) regions.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e569">The significant impact of the WPSH on weather patterns and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations over East China is widely recognized (Bachmann, 2015; Chang et al., 2019; Yin et al., 2019; Zhao and Wang, 2017). It is well established that the WPSH plays a critical role in controlling weather conditions, which in turn affects O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. For example, the WPSH is known to contribute to the formation of the East Asian monsoon and influence precipitation patterns in the YRD. It also influences air temperature and precipitation across northern and southern China (Zhang, 2001; Zhao and Wang, 2017). These changes in meteorological conditions have a profound impact on the photochemical production, dispersion, and accumulation of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e599">Previous studies have indicated that in the peripheries of TCs, the PRD experiences specific atmospheric conditions, e.g., high pressure, low humidity, and intense solar radiation, which are highly conducive to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. These conditions often result in consecutive days with elevated levels of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as observed in various case studies (Ouyang et al., 2022; Wei et al., 2016). Furthermore, statistical investigations have established several noteworthy connections between TCs and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the PRD area. For example, the meteorological conditions associated with the TC periphery frequently contributed to the formation of elevated surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels and aerosols (Deng et al., 2019). In addition, TCs in the East China Sea had a higher likelihood of causing increased O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the PRD region (Zhao et al., 2022). Last, TCs in the vicinity of Taiwan have the greatest influence on air quality in Hong Kong when compared to TCs in other areas, which is primarily because these TCs facilitate the transportation of air pollutants from the PRD region (Lam et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e647">In this study, we focus on exploring possible contributions to the large O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in the three megacity clusters in eastern China by the changes in the meteorological parameters associated with the WPSH and TCs during the period 2015–2020. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, the data and methodology used in this study are described. Major characteristics of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> interannual variability and increases in the three megacity clusters are discussed in Sect. 3.1. In Sect. 3.2, we examine the spatial expansion and saturation of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The annual change in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days with different durations are also examined. A hypothesis of the cause of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in three megacity clusters in eastern China during 2015–2020 is presented in Sect. 3.3. Section 4 presents a summary and the conclusions.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1609?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Pollutant data</title>
      <p id="d1e711">The observed hourly concentrations of air pollutants, including O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2015 to 2020 are obtained from the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (<uri>http://www.cnemc.cn/</uri>, last access: 3 March 2021). Gridded MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data from Tracking Air Pollution in China dataset (<uri>http://tapdata.org.cn</uri>, last access: 31 December 2020) with a resolution of 10 km are also used (Xue et al., 2020).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Meteorological data</title>
      <p id="d1e774">The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) dataset (available at <uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/</uri>, last access: 28 February 2021), with a horizontal resolution of 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a temporal resolution of 1 h, was used to analyze the influence of meteorological parameters on O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution. The variables used in this study include 2 m temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and surface net solar radiation (SSR). In addition, daily mean relative humidity, geopotential height, zonal and meridional wind at 500 hPa, and vertical velocity at 850 hPa from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) reanalysis (<uri>https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis.html</uri>, last access: 3 March 2021) at a resolution of 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are used.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e867">The Chinese national ambient air quality standard for MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is 160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which corresponds to 75 ppb at 273.15 K and 1 atm. The O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days are defined as MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 ppb, while non-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days are defined as MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 ppb. According to the duration of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution episode, it can be divided into consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days with 4 or more days (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4) and consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days with fewer than 4 d (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4). In addition, some commonly used methods are applied in this study, including linear fitting, meteorological synthesis , and the two-tailed Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test.</p>
      <p id="d1e1016">The normalized annual mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days is calculated by adding the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding day each year and dividing it by the total number of days in the year. The normalized annual mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the non-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days is calculated by the same method, except for the non-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days.</p>
      <p id="d1e1083">Table 1 lists the criteria and corresponding numbers of low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in the three megacity clusters. This classification is undertaken with the purpose of distinguishing stations with various O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels within the three megacity clusters, and it is based on the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2015. Stations with the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days fewer than or equal to the low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> criterion (second column) are considered to be low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations. When more than or equal to the high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> criterion (fourth column), then they are considered to be  high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations. We have tested a few reasonably different criteria and found only some insignificant differences in the results; i.e., the results associated with low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations are robust against reasonable changes in their selection criteria. For example, the relatively large criterion (37 d) of low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in the YRD is intended to include a large enough number of stations (about one-third of the total of 152 stations) to be fully representative of low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and moderate-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations. These results have been compared to those of a more stringent criterion of 19 d and found no notable change in the major characteristics (Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplement).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1218">Criteria and corresponding numbers of low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in the three megacity clusters in 2015. The criterion listed for each megacity cluster was based on the number of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2015. For instance, the criterion for a low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> site in BTH was the number of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2015 being smaller than or equal to 19 d, while for high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> site was the number of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2015 being greater than or equal to 71 d.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Criterion of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Criterion of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Number of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Total number</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">of stations</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BTH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">78</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">YRD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">152</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PRD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Major characteristics of O${}_{{3}}$ increases}?><title>Major characteristics of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases</title>
      <p id="d1e1533">Major characteristics of the large increases in the annual mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration are shown in Fig. 2a, b, and c for the BTH, YRD, and PRD regions, respectively, in which the normalized annual mean concentrations of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the three megacity clusters are compared to contributions from two groups, namely the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days and non-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days. The increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days is the primary contributor to the substantial increase in the annual mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in all three megacity clusters from 2015 to 2020. The contribution of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days is affected mostly by the changing number of exceeding days (more than 80 %) and second, but nevertheless significantly, by their changes in concentrations (less than 20 %) (Tables 2–4). For example, in BTH, the exceeding days were 31, 43, 62, 74, 96, and 78 d in the individual years of 2015–2020, respectively, while the concentrations of those years were 66.42, 64.13, 69.44, 68.21, 70.19, and 69.69, respectively (Table 2; second column). Contributions from non-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days are insignificant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1), except in BTH (Fig. 2a), which shows a significant declining contribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02) due to the reduced number of non-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days. Therefore, the following discussions on the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases will be focused on the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1667">Contributions from the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (red) and non-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (green) to the annual mean concentration of maximum daily 8 h average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (black) in the BTH <bold>(a)</bold>, YRD <bold>(b)</bold>, and PRD <bold>(c)</bold> regions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1717">Mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (ppb) and number of days of all O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (second column), consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days with fewer than 4 d (third column), consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days with 4 or more days (fourth column), and the difference between (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d) and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d) (fifth column) within the BTH box in 2015–2020.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Year</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All days</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Difference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentration (days)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">concentration (days)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">concentration (days)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ppb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">66.42(31)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.04(24)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.14(07)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64.13(43)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.65(26)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66.39(17)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">69.44(62)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.32(34)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.43(28)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">68.21(74)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.43(27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">69.80(47)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">70.19(96)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.28(30)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.42(66)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">69.69(78)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.52(40)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.08(38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2008">Mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (ppb) and number of days of all O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (second column), consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days with fewer than 4 d (third column), consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days with 4 or more days (fourth column), and the difference between (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d) and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d) (fifth column) within the YRD box in 2015–2020.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Year</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All days</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Difference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentration (days)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">concentration (days)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">concentration (days)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ppb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53.79(31)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.59(19)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54.11(12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58.87(27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58.03(23)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">63.73(04)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64.35(40)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.62(25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67.22(15)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">63.33(43)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.49(32)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">65.75(11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">67.18(49)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66.09(27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">68.51(22)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">65.84(38)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">64.12(27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70.06(11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{3}?></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2299">Mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (ppb) and number of days of all O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (second column), consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days with fewer than 4 d (third column), consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days with 4 or more days (fourth column), and the difference between (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d) and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d) (fifth column) within the PRD box in 2015–2020.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Year</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All days</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Difference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentration (days)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">concentration (days)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">concentration (days)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ppb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ppb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">61.16(14)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">61.16(14)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–(0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58.44(19)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58.44(19)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–(0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">65.18(36)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">64.60(23)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66.20(13)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">65.82(31)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">63.27(16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">68.55(15)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">69.80(62)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.96(29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.16(33)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">65.08(37)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">63.87(22)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66.84(15)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{4}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2587">Annual numbers of single and consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days are shown in Fig. 3a, b, and c for the BTH, YRD, and PRD regions, respectively. A drastic 2- to 3-fold increase in the annual numbers of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days can be seen in all three regions. In contrast, the numbers of single O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days show only a slight increase in the PRD. These drastic increases in the annual numbers of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days are clearly the primary contributors to the increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in Fig. 2a, b, and c. This brings up two key scientific questions: what causes the drastic increases in the numbers of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days? Is it due to changing emissions of air pollutants or changing meteorological parameters?</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2648">Annual numbers of various consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in the BTH <bold>(a)</bold>, YRD <bold>(b)</bold>, and PRD <bold>(c)</bold> regions. Individual colors denote different numbers of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page1610?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Spatial expansion and saturation of high O${}_{{3}}$}?><title>Spatial expansion and saturation of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e2701">Another important changing characteristics of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is illustrated in Fig. 4a, which depicts the annual mean concentrations of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in BTH during O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days for all 78 stations (black line), 14 stations in the highest category of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (average 103 ppb) observed in 2015 (red line; denoted as high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations hereafter; Table 1), and 13 stations in the lowest category of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (average 57 ppb) observed in 2015 (green line; denoted as low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations hereafter; Table 1). It is remarkable that O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations caught up to be within 12 ppb of other stations in merely 2 years (an increase of about 30 ppb from 2015 to 2017) and actually equaled the average of other stations in 2019. Meanwhile, the high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations experienced a slight decrease in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, although not statistically significant. This phenomenon suggests strongly that the annual mean concentrations of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in BTH experienced a fast (within 2 years) and widespread spatial expansion of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from urban centers to surrounding regions where O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were low in 2015. Temporally, most of the expansion was accomplished during 2015–2017. This phenomenon of a fast and widespread expansion of high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from urban centers to surrounding regions were also observed to a slightly lesser degree in the YRD (Fig. 4b) and PRD (Fig. 4c) regions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2843">Annual mean concentrations (2015–2020) of maximum daily 8 h average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days for all stations (black), high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations (red), and low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations (green) in the BTH <bold>(a)</bold>, YRD <bold>(b)</bold>, and PRD <bold>(c)</bold> regions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1611?><p id="d1e2898">The spatial expansion of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from urban centers to surrounding regions in BTH and the YRD during 2015–2017 can be clearly visualized in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively. Figure 5a, b, and c show the spatial distribution of the daily mean concentrations of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in BTH in 2015 and 2017 and their difference (2017 minus 2015), respectively. Comparing Fig. 5a to b, one can see that the area greater than 80 ppb (75 ppb is the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeding standard) expanded by about a factor of 5 from 2015 to 2017. The daily average concentration of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> within the BTH box increased from 66.42 ppb in 2015 (31 d; Fig. 5a) to 69.44 ppb in 2017 (62 d; Fig. 5b), which was a difference of 3.02 ppb or a merely 4.5 % increase between the 2 years (Fig. 5c). After accounting for the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days, the ratio of normalized MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in all O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days between 2017 and 2015 became 2.09. This comparison suggests that the increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in BTH between 2015 and 2017 was driven primarily by the increase in the number of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days. Spatially, Fig. 5c shows that the expansion is mostly to the southern and southwestern outside of BTH, with the YRD getting a predominant portion of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancements. Within the BTH box, the nearly constant concentrations of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inside Beijing city (40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) coupled with the southwestward expansion of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2017 (Fig. 5c) suggested that there was a saturation of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inside Beijing city. There were also significant increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the YRD and even in southern China as far as the western PRD (Fig. 5c). Nevertheless, the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the YRD and PRD stayed below 70 ppb during the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days of BTH in both 2015 (Fig. 5a) and 2017 (Fig. 5b). In other words, the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days of the YRD and PRD are mostly temporally decoupled (i.e., not occurring at the same time) from those of BTH. A logical explanation for this phenomenon is that the atmospheric conditions conducive to high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in BTH do not overlap significantly with those conditions of the YRD and PRD.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3096">Spatial distribution of annual mean concentrations of maximum daily 8 h average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in BTH in 2015 <bold>(a)</bold>, 2017 <bold>(b)</bold>, and their difference (2017–2015) <bold>(c)</bold>. The top, middle, and bottom rectangular boxes denote the BTH, YRD, and PRD districts, respectively. The number in parentheses behind 2015 or 2017 denotes the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days. Publisher's remark: please note that Figs. 5–7, 9, and 12–15 contain disputed territories.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1612?><p id="d1e3142">Figure 6a, b, and c are the same as Fig. 5a, b, and c, respectively, but for the YRD. Similar to BTH, one can clearly see the expansion of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the vicinity of Shanghai city (31<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 121.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in the northwestern direction reaching as far as the central BTH box during the period 2015–2017 (Fig. 6b and c). Comparing Fig. 6a to 6b, one can see that the area greater than 70 ppb expanded from Shanghai and vicinity northwestward by more than a factor of 5 from 2015 to 2017. This expansion was in a different direction from the southwestern expansion occurred in BTH (Fig. 5c). We note, however, this expansion does not necessarily mean the direct transport of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or its precursors from the vicinity of Shanghai to central BTH. In fact, the presence of separate rather than contiguous red patches of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 ppb) in the southern BTH and northern YRD in Fig. 6b is a clear indication that the high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are primarily controlled by local photochemical production from local O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors, rather than the direct upwind–downwind transport of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or its precursors. The daily average concentration of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> within the YRD box increased from 53.79 ppb in 2015 (31 d; Fig. 6a) to 64.35 ppb in 2017 (40 d; Fig. 6b), which was a difference of 10.56 ppb or a 20 % increase between the 2 years (Fig. 6c). After accounting for the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days, the ratio of normalized MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in all O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days between 2017 and 2015 became 1.54. This comparison suggests that the increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the YRD between 2015 and 2017 was due to both the increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 %) and the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34 %).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3306">Spatial distribution of annual mean concentrations of maximum daily 8 h average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in the YRD in 2015 <bold>(a)</bold>, 2017 <bold>(b)</bold> and their difference (2017–2015) <bold>(c)</bold>. The top, middle, and bottom rectangular boxes denote the BTH, YRD, and PRD districts, respectively. The number in parentheses behind 2015 or 2017 denotes the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3352">Figure 7a, b, and c are the same as Fig. 5a, b, and c, respectively, but for the PRD. Unlike BTH and the YRD, there was only a slight expansion of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> within the PRD box toward the southwest in 2017 compared to 2015 (Fig. 7c). Nevertheless, outside the PRD box, there was an extensive expansion of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in eastern China, substantially greater than the expansion within the PRD box (Fig. 7c). The daily average concentration of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> within the PRD box increased from 61.16 ppb in 2015 (14 d; Fig. 7a) to 65.18 ppb in 2017 (36 d; Fig. 7b), which was a difference of 4.02 ppb or a merely 6.6 % increase between the 2 years (Fig. 7c). After accounting for the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days, the ratio of normalized MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in all O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days between 2017 and 2015 became 2.74. This comparison suggests that the increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the PRD between 2015 and 2017 was almost entirely (93.4 %), due to the increase in the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3430">Spatial distribution of annual mean concentrations of maximum daily 8 h average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in the PRD in 2015 <bold>(a)</bold>, 2017 <bold>(b)</bold> and their difference (2017–2015) <bold>(c)</bold>. The top, middle, and bottom rectangular boxes denote the BTH, YRD, and PRD districts, respectively. The number in parentheses behind 2015 or 2017 denotes the number of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3477">Figure 7a and b reconfirm that O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in the PRD were mostly decoupled from those in BTH (Fig. 5a and b) and the YRD (Fig. 6a and b), as their spatial distributions were characterized by highly distinctive regional features in both 2015 and 2017. These differences suggest that the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days mostly occur in different days in the three individual regions. On the other hand, a comparison of Figs. 7c, 6c, and 5c reveals a striking common feature of high values in the southwestern BTH and northwestern YRD and low values in eastern parts of all three of the BTH,<?pagebreak page1613?> YRD, and PRD boxes. These common features suggest that the difference between 2015 and 2017 in all three individual regions is likely caused by a common mechanism or process that changed from 2015 to 2017. Moreover, as suggested in Fig. 3, this common mechanism or process must be closely related to a higher number of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2017 over those of 2015.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1614?><p id="d1e3507">A comparison of Fig. 8a to Fig. 1 reveals an interesting point. While the yearly average MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at all stations in BTH (green line in Fig. 1) shows a significant O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase of 2.38 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the black line in Fig. 8a (MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of all stations during O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days) shows an insignificant increase of 1.22 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is because the values in Fig. 8 are those of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days, of which O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations (red line in Fig. 8a) have a small decrease (although insignificant) due to the saturation effect discussed above. This decrease is the main contributor to the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.2 of the black line in Fig. 8a (all stations).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3632">Annual mean concentrations of maximum daily 8 h average O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in BTH during O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days for all stations (black), high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations (red), and low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations (green) <bold>(a)</bold>, The rest of the figure shows the same as panel <bold>(a)</bold> but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold>, CO <bold>(d)</bold>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(e)</bold>, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(f)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3738">We believe this spatial expansion and saturation of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a significant new finding, which may provide critical clue to the cause(s) of the large O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases. Its robustness against new data in 2021 and 2022 has been evaluated and reconfirmed in the Supplement (Fig. S14).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Causes of ozone enhancement at low-concentration sites and saturation at high-concentration sites</title>
      <p id="d1e3767">The major findings of Sect. 3.1 and 3.2 can be summarized as follows: (1) the increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in the three megacity clusters in eastern China during 2015–2020 (Fig. 1) were mainly caused by the large increases of approximately 2- to 3-fold increase in the number of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (Figs. 2 and 3). (2) A fast and widespread expansion of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from urban centers to surrounding regions was observed in the three megacity clusters during 2015–2019 (Fig. 4), and the majority of the expansions were accomplished during the 2015–2017 period (green lines in Fig. 4). (3) The expansions of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the three megacity clusters were accompanied by a saturation effect that O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations of approximately 100 ppb in 2015 remained nearly constant or declined slightly throughout the entire period of 2015–2020 (Fig. 4).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Changing emissions as a possible cause of O${}_{{3}}$ increases in 2015--2020}?><title>Changing emissions as a possible cause of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in 2015–2020</title>
      <p id="d1e3842">As mentioned earlier, two emission-oriented hypotheses have been proposed as a possible cause of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in 2015–2020. One is the changing emissions of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs (Li et al., 2022). The other is the reduced removal of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals due to diminishing PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (K. Li et al., 2021; Shao et al., 2021). Li et al. (2022) showed that the NO titration effect was the cause of the linear trend in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the PRD (0.5 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the relatively long period of 2006–2019. But for the period of 2015–2020, the NO titration effect could account for only about 10 % of the linear increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in the PRD (5.0 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; green line; Fig. S3a).</p>
      <p id="d1e3944">The increase of 30 ppb in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in BTH from 2015 to 2017 (green line; Figs. 4a and 8a) represents about 50 % increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The titration effect can account for only about 5 % (Fig. 8f). If this increase of 30 ppb in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were due to an enhancement in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors, then the enhancement would have to be substantially greater than 50 % because of the well-known less-than-linear relationship between the changes in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its precursors; i.e., substantially higher percentage changes in precursors are needed for each percentage change in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dodge, 1977; Shafer and Seinfeld, 1985). Figure 8d and f show that CO (a proxy for VOCs) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changed only by a few percent from 2015 to 2017, which is more than 1 order of magnitude less than the changes needed. Hence, it appears that changes in meteorological conditions conducive to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation are more likely the major contributing factor to the 50 % increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in BTH. A similar argument can be extended to the YRD and PRD (Figs. S1 and S3).</p>
      <?pagebreak page1615?><p id="d1e4049">The theory of reduced removal of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals by diminishing PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (25 %; green line in Fig. 8c) appeared to be qualitatively valid for the 50 % increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in BTH from 2015 to 2017 (green line in Fig. 8a). But this theory was contradicted directly by the phenomenon at the high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations, where a 30 % reduction in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (red line in Fig. 8c) corresponded to a decrease rather than an increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (red line in Fig. 8a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Changes in meteorological parameters as a possible cause of
O${}_{{3}}$ increases in 2015--2020}?><title>Changes in meteorological parameters as a possible cause of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in 2015–2020</title>
      <p id="d1e4134">Figure 9a shows the mean daily O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of the first group with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (labeled O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4) in 2015; Fig. 9b shows the mean daily O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of the second group with fewer than 4 consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (labeled O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4); and Fig. 9c is the difference between the two groups (6.10 ppb; Table 2). Figure 9d–f are the same as Fig. 9a–c, respectively, but for 2017. The first group in 2017 had 28 d and mean O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 74.43 ppb inside the BTH box, while the second group had 34 d and 65.32 ppb (Table 2). One of the most remarkable differences between 2017 and 2015 in Fig. 9a–f was the large number of days with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (first group) in 2017 (28 d; Fig. 9d) over that of 2015 (7 d; Fig. 9a), which alone contributed to about 62 % of the difference in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2017 and 2015 as shown in Fig. 2a (red line). Approximately 30 % was contributed by the 10 d difference (2017 vs. 2015) in the number of days with fewer than four consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (second group). The contribution by the higher average concentration of MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the first group in 2017 is only about 8 % (Table 2). These values of the contributions reconfirm what is shown in Fig. 3a; i.e., the greater frequency of episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days contributes the majority (62 %) to the higher O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in BTH in 2017 vs. 2015, and the greater intensity/concentration of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the episodes contributes only about 8 %, consistent with the expansion and saturation effect discussed earlier.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e4281">Spatial distribution of daily mean MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in BTH for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2015 <bold>(a)</bold>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with fewer than 4 consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2015 <bold>(b)</bold>, and (<bold>a</bold> minus <bold>b</bold>) <bold>(c)</bold>. Panels <bold>(d)</bold>, <bold>(e)</bold>, and <bold>(f)</bold> are the same as panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold>, and <bold>(c)</bold>, respectively, but for 2017.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4379">The phenomena illustrated in Fig. 9a–f also exist in the YRD and PRD, as well as in most other years. Figures equivalent to Fig. 9a–c for all years in the three city clusters are provided in the Supplement (Figs. S4–S6). Essential information derived from those figures is summarized in Tables 2–4.</p>
      <p id="d1e4383">In Fig. 10a and b, the values of SSR and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days are compared to those of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with fewer than four consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days and to those of clean days (non-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days). As expected, the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days consistently have the highest values of SSR and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the clean days have the lowest values. This is the case in nearly all years studied, as shown in the Supplement (Fig. S7), and is also generally true in the YRD and PRD regions (Figs. S8 and S9). Coupling the higher values of SSR and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with 4 or more consecutive  O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days depicted in Fig. 10 and a greater number of days in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days shown in Fig. 3, we therefore propose a hypothesis as follows: the cause of worsening O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in the BTH, YRD, and PRD regions from 2015 to 2020 could be attributed to enhanced photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production due to increased occurrence of meteorological conditions of high solar radiation and positive temperature anomaly at the surface.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e4546">Surface solar radiation (SSR) <bold>(a)</bold> and temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(b)</bold> in BTH in April–September 2017 for four episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (red), clean days (non-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days) (green), and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with fewer than 4 consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (orange).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1617?><p id="d1e4614">Quantitatively the coupling of Fig. 10 with Fig. 3 can be performed by multiplying the difference between the red (4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days) and green (clean days) values of SSR or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 10 with the frequency of occurrence (in percentage of total days) of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days from Fig. 3. The results are compared to the yearly O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in Fig. 11. The correlation between the yearly O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days and weighed SSR is very good, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.88 or greater in all three regions, lending strong support to our hypothesis. The correlation between the yearly O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days and weighed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is highly correlated in BTH but not correlated in the YRD and PRD, which probably suggests that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not as strongly coupled to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation as SSR. Inclusion of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with fewer than 4 consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in Fig. 11 did not change the correction coefficients significantly, supporting the robustness of results shown in Fig. 11.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e4757">Correlations among annual O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days, surface solar radiation (SSR), and temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the BTH <bold>(a)</bold>, YRD <bold>(b)</bold>, and PRD <bold>(c)</bold> regions.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4800">Hu et al. (2023), in collaboration with this study, conducted a statistical analysis to assess the processes that contribute to high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in the PRD when TCs were present in the northwestern Pacific. They investigated the impact of the distance between TCs in the northwestern Pacific and PRD on the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the PRD from 2006 to 2020. They found that the large numbers of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2017 and 2019 relative to 2015 were primarily attributable to the greater occurrence of downdrafts and stable atmospheric conditions brought about by mid-distance-category TCs. This finding clearly establishes that changing frequency of mid-distance-category TCs (i.e., changing meteorological conditions) is the cause of the increases in the numbers of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days, as well as the higher-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the PRD. An ongoing study by our research group further shows that the mid-distance-category TCs are predominately those TCs with tracks starting around the southern Philippines and ending near Korea and/or Japan. Since TC tracks in northwestern Pacific are strongly controlled by the WPSH, we conclude that both the Philippines-to-Korea or Japan track TCs and corresponding distribution and intensity of the WPSH contributed to the favorable meteorological conditions leading to higher consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in the PRD from 2015 to 2020.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e4861">Mean vertical velocity at 850 hPa during O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in the PRD in 2015 <bold>(a)</bold> and during episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2017 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4894">Following the analysis by Hu et al. (2023), the mean vertical velocity at 850 hPa during all O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in the PRD in 2015 (Fig. 12a) is compared to that of episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2017 (Fig. 12b). Major features in Fig. 12 compare very well with those of Fig. 7; e.g., the area with positive vertical velocity (downdrafts) in 2017 (red area in Fig. 12b), which was highly conducive to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, was by far more widespread and greater in value than that of 2015 (red area in Fig. 12a), agreeing better with the greater high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> area of Fig. 7b (2017) than that of Fig. 7a (2015). This agreement confirms that the increase in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the PRD from 2015 to 2017 was caused by increased downdrafts and stable atmospheric conditions (meteorological conditions) brought about by TCs, as suggested by Hu et al. (2023). The same plots for BTH are shown in Fig. 13. The features of Fig. 13 are highly consistent with those of Fig. 5. The same plot for the YRD (Fig. S10) also showed more extensive and greater downdrafts in 2017 than 2015. However, the area of the positive vertical velocity in the YRD appeared to shift by about 500 km to the east compared to the area of high of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 6b. Considering the uncertainty in evaluating the vertical velocity and that O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation is also dependent on parameters other than the vertical velocity, the  discrepancy is acceptable.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e4963">Mean vertical velocity at 850 hPa during O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in BTH in 2015 <bold>(a)</bold> and during episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2017 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4996">To summarize this section, the increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the three megacity clusters are critically dependent on the number of 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days. In addition, Hu et al. (2023) found that the changing frequency of mid-distance-category TCs (i.e., changing meteorological conditions) is the cause of the increases in the numbers of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days, as well as the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the PRD. More importantly, our additional analyses of the mean vertical velocity at 850 hPa over the three megacity clusters (Figs. 12, 13, and S10) show that the increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in all three megacity clusters from 2015 to 2017 were caused by enhanced downdrafts and stable atmospheric conditions (meteorological conditions) which were highly conducive to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. The enhanced downdrafts and stable atmospheric conditions were brought about by TCs and the associated WPSH. Here we bring up the WPSH because it is well known that the tracks of TCs are influenced strongly by the WPSH and that WPSH strongly affects the regional atmospheric dynamics and therefore O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (Chang et al., 2019; Mao et al., 2020; Ouyang et al., 2022; Zhao and Wang, 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>3.3.3</label><title>Contribution of WPSH</title>
      <p id="d1e5071">Mao et al. (2020) made a comprehensive study of an 11 d O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episode in BTH in 2017 and found that it was dominated by the presence of the WPSH and mid–high-latitude wave activities. Depending on the position and intensity, the WPSH is well known to be a crucial factor affecting O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in various parts of eastern China (Chang et al., 2019; Yin et al., 2019; Zhao and Wang, 2017). During this 11 d O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episode, the ridge line of the WPSH maintained at approximately 22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N from 24 to 29 June 29, which, in combination with mid–high-latitude wave activities, induced meteorological conditions highly conducive to the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production in BTH and the northern YRD (Mao et al., 2020).</p>
      <?pagebreak page1619?><p id="d1e5119">Following the analysis of Mao et al. (2020), the impact of the WPSH on O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in BTH in April–September has been analyzed in Fig. 14, which depicts the composite 500 hPa geopotential height contours, humidity, and winds in BTH in April–September for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2015 (Fig. 14a), clean days in 2015 (Fig. 14b), O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2017 (Fig. 14c), clean days in 2017 (Fig. 14d), O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2019 (Fig. 14e), and clean days in 2019 (Fig. 14f). The 3 years (2015, 2017, and 2019) are chosen because their differences in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contribute predominately to the overall O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases (Figs. 1–2). The importance of the WPSH is clearly visible in all Fig. 14a–f when the 5880 and 5900 gpm isolines (green lines) of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days are compared to those of clean days. In all 3 years, the WPSH of the former (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days) were significantly stronger than the latter (clean days), as evident by the strong anticyclonic winds and/or the larger areas inside the 5880 gpm isolines. Even in the case of 2017, when the area inside 5880 gpm isolines of the former looked to be similar to that of the latter, the appearance of the 5900 gpm line in the former indicated a stronger WPSH. The strong anticyclonic winds in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (Fig. 14a, c, and e) force the moist air of the South China Sea northward into southern China and contributed to extensive clouds and precipitation and thus low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation over southern China and the southern YRD. This difference in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation between BTH and southern China provides a good explanation for why the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days mostly occur in different time periods in the three megacity clusters, as discussed in Sect. 3.2. Furthermore, over the East China Sea, the prevailing westerlies were forced northward, slowed down, and led to meteorological conditions in BTH and the northern YRD characterized by a cloudless sky, a sinking motion, and high vertical stability in the lower troposphere, as well as high SSR and a positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly at the surface. These meteorological conditions were highly conducive to the formation and accumulation of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the weaker WPSH of the clean days allowed relatively strong westerlies to prevail over BTH during clean days in the 3 years, which tended to disperse O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 14b, d, and f); e.g., the average wind speed over BTH was about 10 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 14b, while it was only about 5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 12a. Quantitatively, Fig. 12c had 31 more O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (93 ppb) than Fig. 14a, but the 31 d came at the expense of clean days (52 ppb) (Fig. 14b and d). The contribution of these 31 d to the difference in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2017 and 2015 (6.5 ppb; Fig. 1) can be calculated as follows: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">93</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb. This difference of 10.8 ppb in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2017 and 2015 was for the period of April to September. It should be divided by 2 and then becomes 5.4 ppb for the yearly difference in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2017 and 2015. This value of 5.4 ppb accounted for 83 % of the observed difference in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2017 and 2015 (6.5 ppb; Fig. 1). A similar statement can be made for the difference in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2019 and 2017 (Fig. 14e and c; Fig. 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e5439">Composite 500 hPa geopotential height contours, humidity, and winds in BTH in April–September for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2015 <bold>(a)</bold>, clean days in 2015 <bold>(b)</bold>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2017 <bold>(c)</bold>, clean days in 2017 <bold>(d)</bold>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2019 <bold>(e)</bold>, and clean days in 2019 <bold>(f)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f14.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5495">We have made the same analysis for other years as well for the YRD and PRD. The results are mostly similar and thus presented in the Supplement (Figs. S11, S12, and S13). Figure 15a–d for the PRD in 2017 and 2019 is shown because there were interesting anticyclonic circulations over the PRD during O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in both years (Fig. 15a and c). The 2017 anticyclone was a direct product of the WPSH, as it resided within the western tip of the 5880 gpm isoline. The 2019 anticyclone was also likely associated with the WPSH, as the center of anticyclone resided just beneath the 5860 gpm isoline to the west of the PRD. The anticyclonic circulations were accompanied by stable downdrafts, low winds, and cloudless sky conditions (short arrows and blue shading in Fig. 15a and c), which were highly conducive to the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. Cloudless sky conditions also occurred in the YRD and BTH in Fig. 15a and c, but the high wind speed prevented the accumulation of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This difference in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation between the PRD and other two regions provides another good explanation for why the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days mostly occur in different days in the three megacity clusters, as discussed in Sect. 3.2. Quantitatively, Fig. 15c had 27 more O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (90 ppb) than Fig. 13a, but the 27 d came at the expense of clean days (39 ppb) (Fig. 15b and d). The contribution of these 27 d to the difference in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the PRD between 2019 and 2017 (6.0 ppb; Fig. 1) can be calculated as follows: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">182</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">182</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">209</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">209</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb. This difference of 11.6 ppb in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2019 and 2017 was for the period of April to November. It should be divided by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">244</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then become 7.75 ppb for the yearly difference in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2019 and 2017. This value of 7.75 ppb was 1.75 ppb more than the observed difference in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2019 and 2017 (6.3 ppb; Fig. 1), suggesting a reduction of about 3.5 ppb in MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the cold months of January–March and December between 2017 and 2019, which was approximately confirmed by the observed reduction of 3.88 ppb.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e5704">Composite 500 hPa geopotential height contours, humidity, and winds in the PRD in April–November for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2017 <bold>(a)</bold>, clean days in 2017 <bold>(b)</bold>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days in 2019 <bold>(c)</bold>, and clean days in 2019 <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f15.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5744">The presence of anticyclonic circulations over the PRD is in good agreement with the results of Ouyang et al. (2022) and Hu et al. (2023). The latter authors suggested that the anticyclonic circulations over the PRD were primarily caused by TCs in northwestern Pacific. Nevertheless, it is widely acknowledged that the tracks of TCs in the northwestern Pacific are influenced, at least to some extent, by the WPSH (Sun et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017), making it difficult to separate the roles played by the TCs on the anticyclonic circulations and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation from those of the WPSH. Clearly, further investigation is needed to fully understand the complex relationship among the WPSH, TCs, and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on these results, we hypothesize that the increased frequency of these meteorological conditions enabled by the changing intensity and position of the WPSH could contribute as a major cause of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in the three megacity clusters in eastern China during 2015–2020.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>3.3.4</label><title>Saturation at high-concentration sites</title>
      <?pagebreak page1621?><p id="d1e5783">Why do favorable meteorological conditions only cause an O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase at low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations but not at high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations? And why is the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level at around 100 ppb, as shown in Fig. 4? These questions can be best addressed by examining Fig. 16, which depicts the time series of individual processes (where DDEP denotes dry deposition, CHEM the net photochemical production of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HTRA the horizontal transport, and VTRA the vertical transport) contributing to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget in the PRD (averaged over 56 stations in the PRD) calculated by the WRF–CMAQ model for the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episode of 24 September–1 October 2019 (Ouyang et al., 2022). This episode was one of the most severe O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes since the official O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observation started in the PRD in 2006. MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeded the 75 ppb standard on all 8 d of the episode. Hourly O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reached as high as 110 ppb, yet all MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stayed approximately between 75 and 100 ppb. This suggests a ceiling or saturation level of approximately 100 ppb for MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with what was observed in Fig. 4 for the PRD, as well as BTH and the YRD. Since this episode was one of the most severe episodes, we can assume that the 100 ppb saturation level would also be applicable to other O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes in Guangdong. More importantly, the saturation effect was also a common feature in the results of other three-dimensional models for other megacity clusters, in which MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> usually saturated at 100 ppb, e.g., in the YRD (Li et al., 2012) and in Beijing (Zhang et al., 2023). This explains why the saturation O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level is around 100 ppb, as shown in Fig. 4.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e5934">Time series of individual processes contributing to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> budget in the PRD calculated by the WRF–CMAQ model for the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episode of 24 September–1 October 2019. The black line (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) represents the averaged O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the layers below 1260 m. DDEP denotes dry deposition, CHEM denotes chemical processes, HTRA denotes the horizontal transport, and VTRA denotes the vertical transport.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1607/2024/acp-24-1607-2024-f16.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5979">With regard to the first question above (why do the favorable meteorological conditions only cause O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase at low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations but not at high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations?), it can be understood as follows. At a low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> station of 65 ppb MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the PRD in 2015 (Fig. 4c), Fig. 16 shows that MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can readily increase to 75–100 ppb in a few hours from an early morning low-ozone level of about 50 ppb under favorable meteorological conditions. However, at a high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> station of 100 ppb MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2015 (Fig. 4c) under the same favorable meteorological conditions, MDA8 O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> would also reach 75–100 ppb in a few hours from an early morning low-ozone level of about 50 ppb. (Note that we assume that all stations start the day with an early-morning low-ozone level of 50 ppb, consistent with the value in Fig. 16). In other words, the saturation levels at all stations are the same at 75–100 ppb, independent of the ozone concentration in 2015.</p>
      <p id="d1e6065">In terms of contributing processes, the saturation level of 75–100 ppb is controlled primarily by photochemical loss, dry deposition, and dispersion to the free troposphere.<?pagebreak page1622?> This can be clearly seen in Fig. 16 because on all 8 d in the mid-morning, when O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is approaching toward its peak value, CHEM declines sharply due to photochemical loss and HTRA, VTRA, and DDEP all increase. Near noontime, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> starts to drop sharply.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Uncertainty and cautionary statements</title>
      <p id="d1e6095">It is worth noting that the analyses conducted in Sect. 3.1–3.3 have predominantly relied on correlation or regression analysis techniques, which do not imply a cause-and-effect relationship. To establish a cause-and-effect link between the proposed changes in meteorological parameters and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, it is necessary to employ a mechanistic model that is based on the proposed causes and can accurately reproduce the observed O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase. Until such a model reproduction is achieved, all correlation or regression findings should be considered to be a potential maximum cause-and-effect relationship (Wu et al., 2022). However, current mechanistic models suffer from significant uncertainties, making it difficult to credibly simulate critical atmospheric processes that regulate O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. These processes include atmospheric transport parameterizations, the sources and sinks of OH, HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, and the photochemistry of VOCs and oxygenated VOCs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6152">Thanks to a strong emission control policy, major air pollutants in China, including PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO have shown remarkable reductions during 2015–2020. However, the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration increased significantly and emerged as a major air pollutant in eastern China during the same time period. The annual mean concentration of MDA8 in three megacity clusters in eastern China, namely the BTH, YRD, and PRD regions, showed alarming large upward linear increases of 25 %, 10 %, and 19 %, respectively, during 2015–2019. Identifying the causes of these worsening O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases is urgently required for air pollution prevention and management. Some recent studies suggested that enhanced photochemical processes induced by changing anthropogenic emissions were responsible for these increases (Li et al., 2019, 2022; Shao et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020). However, we noticed that there were independent pieces of evidence, including the spatial expansion of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 5 and 6) and inter-annual variations in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8), suggesting that transport or meteorological conditions rather than emissions of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precursors were more likely to be the major contributor to the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases. Moreover, we found that the increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in the three megacity clusters during 2015–2020 (Fig. 1) were mainly caused by the approximately 2- to 3-fold increase in the number of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (Fig. 3). In addition, there was a fast and widespread expansion of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from urban centers to surrounding regions (Fig. 4), and most of the expansions was accomplished during the 2015–2017 period (green lines in Fig. 4). Furthermore, the expansions of high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the three megacity clusters were accompanied by a saturation effect; of that, the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in 2015 of approximately 100 ppb remained nearly constant throughout 2015–2022 (Fig. S14), while the low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations in 2015 with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fewer than 75 ppb in all three megacity clusters experienced a significant enhancement in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 ppb yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during 2015–2017 (Fig. 4a, b, and c). Finally, greater frequency of episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days contributed to the majority of the increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in all three megacity clusters in between 2015 and 2017.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1623?><p id="d1e6387">Coupling the higher values of SSR and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days depicted in Fig. 10 and greater occurrence (number of days) in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes with 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days (shown in Fig. 3), we hypothesize that the cause of the worsening O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in the BTH, YRD, and PRD regions from 2015 to 2020 could be attributed to enhanced photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production due to the increased occurrence of meteorological conditions of high solar radiation and positive temperature anomaly under the influence of the WPSH and TCs. The hypothesis is substantiated in Fig. 11, which shows excellent correlation between the yearly O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days and SSR with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.88 or greater in all three regions. Correlation between the yearly O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is good in BTH but poor in the YRD and PRD, which probably suggests that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not as strongly coupled to the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation as SSR.</p>
      <p id="d1e6528">The increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the three megacity clusters are found to be critically dependent on the number of 4 or more consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days. In collaboration with this study, Hu et al. (2023) found that the changing frequency of mid-distance-category TCs (i.e., changing meteorological conditions) is the cause of the increases in the numbers of consecutive O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-exceeding days, as well as the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the PRD. Our additional analyses of the mean vertical velocity at 850 hPa in the three megacity clusters (Figs. 12, 13, and S10) show that the increases in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in all three megacity clusters from 2015 to 2017 were associated with enhanced downdrafts and stable atmospheric conditions (meteorological conditions), which were highly conducive to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation. Finally, the enhanced downdrafts and stable atmospheric conditions were most likely brought about by TCs and the associated WPSH.</p>
      <p id="d1e6586">Therefore, we propose that the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations stayed close to a saturation level of about 100 ppb throughout 2015 to 2020, even under more frequent conditions conducive to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, and were the result of a relatively high rates of atmospheric dispersion, dry deposition, and photochemical loss due to the high-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Fig. 16). While the low-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stations, where O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production was relatively small in 2015, experienced significant enhancements in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production in 2017 and 2019 because of more frequent downdrafts and stable atmospheric conditions associated with TCs and the WPSH in the northwestern Pacific, which were highly conducive to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photochemical production and accumulation (Hu et al., 2023).</p>
      <p id="d1e6663">Following the analysis of Mao et al. (2020), the impact of the WPSH on O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in BTH in April–September has been analyzed in Fig. 14. We found that the increased frequency of these meteorological conditions enabled by the changing intensity and position of the WPSH could contribute as a major cause of the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in the three megacity clusters in eastern China during 2015–2020.</p>
      <p id="d1e6684">Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognize that the examinations carried out in Sect. 3.1–3.3 primarily utilized correlation or regression analysis techniques, which do not inherently establish causal relationships. To attribute cause and effect between the suggested alterations in meteorological parameters and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, it is necessary to employ a mechanistic model that accurately replicates the observed O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increase based on the proposed cause(s). Until the model successfully reproduces the phenomenon, all correlation or regression findings should be treated as merely indicating the highest potential cause-and-effect relationship (Wu et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e6705">In conclusion, we hypothesize that the cause of the worsening O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increases in the BTH, YRD, and PRD regions from 2015 to 2020 is attributable to enhanced photochemical O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production due to the increased occurrence of meteorological conditions of high solar radiation and a positive temperature anomaly under the influence of the WPSH and TCs. Therefore, we suggest that future O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution prevention and control policies should pay more attention to changes in the meteorological or climate conditions, particularly changes in the large-scale circulations, including the WPSH and TCs.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6740">Hourly surface O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data were obtained from China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (2021, <uri>http://www.cnemc.cn/</uri>). Hourly meteorological data are obtained from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ERA5 reanalysis at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link> (Hersbach et al., 2023). Daily meteorological data are obtained from National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>; Kalnay et al., 1996). The data of this study are available upon request to Shaw Chen Liu (shawliu@jnu.edu.cn).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6792">SCL and RL proposed the essential research idea. TH and YL performed the analysis. TH, YL, RL, and SCL drafted the article. YX, SO, BW, and YZ helped with the analysis and offered valuable comments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6798">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e6804">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6810">The authors thank the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts for providing the datasets that made this work possible. We also acknowledge the support of the Institute for Environmental and Climate Research and Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Joint Laboratory of Collaborative Innovation for Environmental Quality at Jinan University.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6815">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 92044302 and 41805115), the Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project (grant no. 202002020065), the Special Fund Project for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy of Guangdong Province (grant no. 2019B121205004), the Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program (grant no. 2016ZT06N263), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2018YFC0213906).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6821">This paper was edited by Jayanarayanan Kuttippurath and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bachmann, J. D.: Air quality and climate connections, J. Air Waste Manage., 65, 641–644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1040697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10962247.2015.1040697</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bell, M. L., Peng, R. D., and Dominci, F.: The exposure–response curve for ozone and risk of mortality and the adequacy of current ozone regulations, Environ. Health Persp., 114, 532–536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1289/ehp.8816</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bian, Y., Huang, Z., Ou, J., Zhong, Z., Xu, Y., Zhang, Z., Xiao, X., Ye, X., Wu, Y., Yin, X., Li, C., Chen, L., Shao, M., and Zheng, J.: Evolution of anthropogenic air pollutant emissions in Guangdong Province, China, from 2006 to 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11701–11719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11701-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11701-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chang, L., Xu, J., Tie, X., and Gao, W.: The impact of climate change on the Western Pacific Subtropical High and the related ozone pollution in Shanghai, China, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 16998, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53103-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-53103-7</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Z., Li, R., Chen, D., Zhuang, Y., Gao, B., Yang, L., and Li, M.: Understanding the causal influence of major meteorological factors on ground ozone concentrations across China, J. Clean. Prod., 242, 118498, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118498" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118498</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>China National Environmental Monitoring Centre: <uri>http://www.cnemc.cn/</uri>, last access: 3 March 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cohen, A. J., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Anderson, H. R., Frostad, J., Estep, K., Balakrishnan, K., Brunekreef, B., Dandona, L., Dandona, R., Feigin, V., Freedman, G., Hubbell, B., Jobling, A., Kan, H., Knibbs, L., Liu, Y., Martin, R., Morawska, L., Pope III C. A., Shin, H., Straif, K., Shaddick, G., Thomas, M., van Dingenen, R., van Donkelaar, A., Vos, T., Murray, C. J. L., and Forouzanfar, M. H.: Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015, The Lancet, 389, 1907–1918, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Deng, T., Wang, T., Wang, S., Zou, Y., Yin, C., Li, F., Liu, L., Wang, N., Song, L., Wu, C., and Wu, D.: Impact of typhoon periphery on high ozone and high aerosol pollution in the Pearl River Delta region, Sci. Total Environ., 668, 617–630, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.450" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.450</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dodge, M. C.: Effect of selected parameters on predictions of a photochemical model, PB-269858; EPA-600/3-77/048, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C., USA, <uri>https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/9101A8K2.PDF?Dockey=9101A8K2.PDF</uri> (last access: 25 January 2024), 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dong, Y., Li, J., Guo, J., Jiang, Z., Chu, Y., Chang, L., Yang, Y., and Liao, H.: The impact of synoptic patterns on summertime ozone pollution in the North China Plain, Sci. Total Environ., 735, 139559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139559" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139559</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, Y., Liao, H., and Yang, Y.: Interannual and decadal changes in tropospheric ozone in China and the associated chemistry-climate interactions: a review, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 975–993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8216-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-019-8216-9</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, D., Xie, M., Chen, X., Wang, T., Liu, J., Xu, Q., Mu, X., Chen, F., Li, S., Zhuang, B., Li, M., Zhao, M., and Ren, J.: Systematic classification of circulation patterns and integrated analysis of their effects on different ozone pollution levels in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China, Atmos. Environ., 242, 117760, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117760" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117760</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Chen, K., Wang, P., Hu, J., Ying, Q., Gao, A., and Zhang, H.: Simulation of summer ozone and its sensitivity to emission changes in China, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 10, 543–1552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2019.05.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2019.05.003</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Han, H., Liu, J., Shu, L., Wang, T., and Yuan, H.: Local and synoptic meteorological influences on daily variability in summertime surface ozone in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 203–222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-203-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-203-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, W., Liu, R., Chen, Z., Ouyang, S., Hu, T., Wang, Y., Cui, Z., Jiang, B., Chen, D., and Liu, S. C.: Processes conducive to high ozone formation in Pearl River Delta in the presence of Pacific tropical cyclones, Atoms. Environ., 307, 119859, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119859</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kalabokas, P., Jensen, N. R., Roveri, M., Hjorth, J., Eremenko, M., Cuesta, J., Dufour, G., Foret, G., and Beekmann, M.: A study of the influence of tropospheric subsidence on spring and summer surface ozone concentrations at the JRC Ispra station in northern Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1861–1885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1861-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1861-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,  Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lam, Y. F., Cheung, H. M., and Ying, C. C.: Impact of tropical cyclone track change on regional air quality, Sci. Total Environ., 610–611, 1347–1355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.100</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Shen, L., Zhang, Q., and Bates, K. H.: Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 422–427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1812168116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1625?><ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Qiu, Y., Shen, L., Zhai, S., Bates, K. H., Sulprizio, M. P., Song, S., Lu, X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Zhang, Y., Lee, H. C., and Su, K. K.: Ozone pollution in the North China Plain spreading into the late-winter haze season, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2015797118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015797118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2015797118</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, L., Chen, C. H., Huang, C., Huang, H. Y., Zhang, G. F., Wang, Y. J., Wang, H. L., Lou, S. R., Qiao, L. P., Zhou, M., Chen, M. H., Chen, Y. R., Streets, D. G., Fu, J. S., and Jang, C. J.: Process analysis of regional ozone formation over the Yangtze River Delta, China using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality modeling system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10971–10987, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10971-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10971-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, M., Wang, T., Shu, L., Qu, Y., Xie, M., Liu, J., Wu, H., and Kalsoom, U.: Rising surface ozone in China from 2013 to 2017: A response to the recent atmospheric warming or pollutant controls?, Atmos. Environ., 246, 118130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118130</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, X., Yuan, B., Parrish, D. D., Chen, D., Song, Y., Yang, S., Liu, Z., and Shao, M.: Long-term trend of ozone in southern China reveals future mitigation strategy for air pollution, Atmos. Environ., 269, 118869, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118869" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118869</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, H., Liu, S., Xue, B., Lv, Z., Meng, Z., Yang, X., Xue, T., Yu, Q., and He, K.: Ground-level ozone pollution and its health impacts in China, Atmos. Environ., 173, 223–230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Hong, J., Zhang, L., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Xu, X., Wang, T., Gao, M., Zhao, Y., and Zhang, Y.: Severe surface ozone pollution in China: A global perspective, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 5, 487–494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00366" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00366</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Zhang, L., and Shen, L.: Meteorology and climate influences on tropospheric ozone: a review of natural sources, chemistry, and transport patterns, Curr. Pollution Rep., 5, 238–260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00118-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40726-019-00118-3</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, J., Xu, X., Zhao, C., and Yan, P.: A review of atmospheric chemistry research in China: Photochemical smog, haze pollution, and gas-aerosol interactions, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1006–1026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-1188-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-012-1188-7</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mao, J., Wang, L., Lu, C., Liu, J., Li, M., Tang, G., Ji, D., Zhang, N., and Wang, Y.: Meteorological mechanism for a large-scale persistent severe ozone pollution event over eastern China in 2017, J. Environ. Sci., 92, 187–199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.019</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.: Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nuvolone, D., Petri, D., and Voller, F.: The effects of ozone on human health, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 25, 8074–8088, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ouyang, S., Deng, T., Liu, R., Chen, J., He, G., Leung, J. C.-H., Wang, N., and Liu, S. C.: Impact of a subtropical high and a typhoon on a severe ozone pollution episode in the Pearl River Delta, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10751–10767, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10751-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-10751-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Professional Committee of Ozone Pollution Control of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences: The Bluebook: Prevention and Control of Ozone Pollution in China (2020), Science Press, Beijing, China, ISBN 978-7-03-071664-4, 2022 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rowlinson, M. J., Rap, A., Arnold, S. R., Pope, R. J., Chipperfield, M. P., McNorton, J., Forster, P., Gordon, H., Pringle, K. J., Feng, W., Kerridge, B. J., Latter, B. L., and Siddans, R.: Impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on the interannual variability of methane and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8669–8686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8669-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8669-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shafer, T. B. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Evaluation of chemical reaction mechanisms for photochemical smog. Part 3. Sensitivity of EKMA (Empirical Kinetic Modeling Approach) to chemical mechanism and input parameters, Final Report, March 1984–February 1985, PB-85-210888/XAB, EPA-600-S3-85-042, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, U.S.A., <uri>https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/2000TMJ3.PDF?Dockey=2000TMJ3.PDF</uri> (last access: 25 January 2024), 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shao, M., Wang, W., Yuan, B., Parrish, D. D., Li, X., Lu, K., Wu, L., Wang, X., Mo, Z., Yang, S., Peng, Y., Kuang, Y., Chen, W., Hu, M., Zeng, L., Su, H., Cheng, Y., Zheng, J., and Zhang, Y.: Quantifying the role of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dropping in variations of ground-level ozone: Inter-comparison between Beijing and Los Angeles, Sci. Total Environ., 788, 147712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147712</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Y., Zhong, Z., Yi, L., Li, T., Chen, M., Wan, H., Wang, Y., and Zhong, K.: Dependence of the relationship between the tropical cyclone track and western Pacific subtropical high intensity on initial storm size: A numerical investigation. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 11451–11467, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023716" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd023716</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Xue, L., Brimblecombe, P., Lam, Y. F., Li, L., and Zhang, L.: Ozone pollution in China: A review of concentrations, meteorological influences, chemical precursors, and effects, Sci. Total Environ., 575, 1582–1596, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.081</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Gao, W., Wang, S., Song, T., Gong, Z., Ji, D., Wang, L., Liu, Z., Tang, G., Huo, Y., Tian, S., Li, J., Li, M., Yang, Y., Chu, B., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., He, H., Hao, J., Kulmala, M., Wang, Y., and Zhang, Y.: Contrasting trends of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and surface-ozone concentrations in China from 2013 to 2017, Natl. Sci. Rev., 7, 1331–1339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nwaa032</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wei, X., Lam, K.-S., Cao, C., Li, H., and He, J.: Dynamics of the Typhoon Haitang related high ozone episode over Hong Kong, Adv. Meteorol., 2016, 6089154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6089154" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2016/6089154</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Liu, R., Li, Y., Dong, J., Huang, Z., Zheng, J., and Liu, S. C.: Contributions of meteorology and anthropogenic emissions to the trends in winter PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in eastern China 2013–2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11945–11955, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11945-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-11945-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xue, T., Zheng, Y., Geng, G., Xiao, Q., Meng, X., Wang, M., Li, X., Wu, N., Zhang, Q., and Zhu, T.: Estimating spatiotemporal variation in ambient ozone exposure during 2013–2017 using a data-fusion model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 14877–14888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c03098</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, W., Chen, H., Wang, W., Wu, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Zheng, J., and Chen, D.: Modeling study of ozone source apportionmen<?pagebreak page1626?>t over the Pearl River Delta in 2015, Environ. Pollut., 253, 393–402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.091</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, Y., Liao, H., and Li, J.: Impacts of the East Asian summer monsoon on interannual variations of summertime surface-layer ozone concentrations over China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6867–6879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6867-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6867-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yin, Z., Cao, B., and Wang, H.: Dominant patterns of summer ozone pollution in eastern China and associated atmospheric circulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13933–13943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13933-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13933-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Wang, X., Shen, L., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Gui, K., Zhao, T., and Liao, H.: Fine particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) trends in China, 2013–2018: separating contributions from anthropogenic emissions and meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11031–11041, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11031-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11031-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, R.: Relations of water vapor transport from Indian Monsoon with that over East Asia and the summer rainfall in China, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 18, 1005–1017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03403519" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf03403519</ext-link>, 2001. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, S., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Du, X., Qu, L., Tang, W., Xu, J., and Meng, F.: Formation processes and source contributions of ground-level ozone in urban and suburban Beijing using the WRF-CMAQ modelling system, J. Environ. Sci., 127, 753–766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.06.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2022.06.016</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Tao, M., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Chen, H., Cai, Z., and Konopka, P.: Long-term variations in ozone levels in the troposphere and lower stratosphere over Beijing: observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13343–13354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13343-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-13343-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, W., Lü, M., Lu, Q., Gao, B., Liang, X., Liu, M., Sun, J., Chen, L., and Fan, S.: Effects of tropical cyclones on ozone pollution in the Pearl River Delta in autumn, Environm. Sci., 43, 2957–2965, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202109169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13227/j.hjkx.202109169</ext-link>, 2022 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Z. and Wang, Y.: Influence of the West Pacific subtropical high on surface ozone daily variability in summertime over eastern China, Atmos. Environ., 170, 197–204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.024</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>What caused large ozone variabilities in three megacity clusters in eastern China during 2015–2020?</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bachmann, J. D.: Air quality and climate connections, J. Air Waste Manage.,
65, 641–644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1040697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1040697</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bell, M. L., Peng, R. D., and Dominci, F.: The exposure–response curve for
ozone and risk of mortality and the adequacy of current ozone regulations,
Environ. Health Persp., 114, 532–536, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8816</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bian, Y., Huang, Z., Ou, J., Zhong, Z., Xu, Y., Zhang, Z., Xiao, X., Ye, X., Wu, Y., Yin, X., Li, C., Chen, L., Shao, M., and Zheng, J.: Evolution of anthropogenic air pollutant emissions in Guangdong Province, China, from 2006 to 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11701–11719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11701-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11701-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, L., Xu, J., Tie, X., and Gao, W.: The impact of climate change on the
Western Pacific Subtropical High and the related ozone pollution in
Shanghai, China, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 16998, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53103-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53103-7</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Z., Li, R., Chen, D., Zhuang, Y., Gao, B., Yang, L., and Li, M.:
Understanding the causal influence of major meteorological factors on ground
ozone concentrations across China, J. Clean. Prod., 242, 118498,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118498" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118498</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
China National Environmental Monitoring Centre: <a href="http://www.cnemc.cn/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 3 March 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cohen, A. J., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Anderson, H. R., Frostad, J., Estep,
K., Balakrishnan, K., Brunekreef, B., Dandona, L., Dandona, R., Feigin, V.,
Freedman, G., Hubbell, B., Jobling, A., Kan, H., Knibbs, L., Liu, Y.,
Martin, R., Morawska, L., Pope III C. A., Shin, H., Straif, K., Shaddick,
G., Thomas, M., van Dingenen, R., van Donkelaar, A., Vos, T., Murray, C. J.
L., and Forouzanfar, M. H.: Estimates and 25-year trends of the global
burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data
from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015, The Lancet, 389, 1907–1918,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deng, T., Wang, T., Wang, S., Zou, Y., Yin, C., Li, F., Liu, L., Wang, N.,
Song, L., Wu, C., and Wu, D.: Impact of typhoon periphery on high ozone and
high aerosol pollution in the Pearl River Delta region, Sci. Total Environ.,
668, 617–630, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.450" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.450</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dodge, M. C.: Effect of selected parameters on predictions of a
photochemical model, PB-269858; EPA-600/3-77/048, Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C., USA, <a href="https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/9101A8K2.PDF?Dockey=9101A8K2.PDF" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 January 2024), 1977.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dong, Y., Li, J., Guo, J., Jiang, Z., Chu, Y., Chang, L., Yang, Y., and
Liao, H.: The impact of synoptic patterns on summertime ozone pollution in
the North China Plain, Sci. Total Environ., 735, 139559,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139559" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139559</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fu, Y., Liao, H., and Yang, Y.: Interannual and decadal changes in
tropospheric ozone in China and the associated chemistry-climate
interactions: a review, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 975–993,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8216-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8216-9</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gao, D., Xie, M., Chen, X., Wang, T., Liu, J., Xu, Q., Mu, X., Chen, F., Li,
S., Zhuang, B., Li, M., Zhao, M., and Ren, J.: Systematic classification of
circulation patterns and integrated analysis of their effects on different
ozone pollution levels in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China, Atmos.
Environ., 242, 117760, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117760" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117760</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, H., Chen, K., Wang, P., Hu, J., Ying, Q., Gao, A., and Zhang, H.:
Simulation of summer ozone and its sensitivity to emission changes in China,
Atmos. Pollut. Res., 10, 543–1552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2019.05.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2019.05.003</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, H., Liu, J., Shu, L., Wang, T., and Yuan, H.: Local and synoptic meteorological influences on daily variability in summertime surface ozone in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 203–222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-203-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-203-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, W., Liu, R., Chen, Z., Ouyang, S., Hu, T., Wang, Y., Cui, Z., Jiang, B.,
Chen, D., and Liu, S. C.: Processes conducive to high ozone formation in Pearl River Delta in the presence of Pacific tropical cyclones, Atoms. Environ., 307, 119859, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119859" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119859</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kalabokas, P., Jensen, N. R., Roveri, M., Hjorth, J., Eremenko, M., Cuesta, J., Dufour, G., Foret, G., and Beekmann, M.: A study of the influence of tropospheric subsidence on spring and summer surface ozone concentrations at the JRC Ispra station in northern Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1861–1885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1861-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1861-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,  Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lam, Y. F., Cheung, H. M., and Ying, C. C.: Impact of tropical cyclone track
change on regional air quality, Sci. Total Environ., 610–611, 1347–1355,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.100</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Shen, L., Zhang, Q., and Bates, K. H.:
Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 422–427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Qiu, Y., Shen, L., Zhai, S., Bates, K. H.,
Sulprizio, M. P., Song, S., Lu, X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Zhang, Y., Lee, H.
C., and Su, K. K.: Ozone pollution in the North China Plain spreading into
the late-winter haze season, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2015797118,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015797118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015797118</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, L., Chen, C. H., Huang, C., Huang, H. Y., Zhang, G. F., Wang, Y. J., Wang, H. L., Lou, S. R., Qiao, L. P., Zhou, M., Chen, M. H., Chen, Y. R., Streets, D. G., Fu, J. S., and Jang, C. J.: Process analysis of regional ozone formation over the Yangtze River Delta, China using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality modeling system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10971–10987, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10971-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10971-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, M., Wang, T., Shu, L., Qu, Y., Xie, M., Liu, J., Wu, H., and Kalsoom, U.:
Rising surface ozone in China from 2013 to 2017: A response to the recent
atmospheric warming or pollutant controls?, Atmos. Environ., 246, 118130,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118130" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118130</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, X., Yuan, B., Parrish, D. D., Chen, D., Song, Y., Yang, S., Liu, Z., and
Shao, M.: Long-term trend of ozone in southern China reveals future
mitigation strategy for air pollution, Atmos. Environ., 269, 118869,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118869" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118869</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, H., Liu, S., Xue, B., Lv, Z., Meng, Z., Yang, X., Xue, T., Yu, Q., and
He, K.: Ground-level ozone pollution and its health impacts in China, Atmos.
Environ., 173, 223–230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, X., Hong, J., Zhang, L., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Xu, X., Wang,
T., Gao, M., Zhao, Y., and Zhang, Y.: Severe surface ozone pollution in
China: A global perspective, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 5, 487–494,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00366" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00366</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, X., Zhang, L., and Shen, L.: Meteorology and climate influences on
tropospheric ozone: a review of natural sources, chemistry, and transport
patterns, Curr. Pollution Rep., 5, 238–260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00118-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00118-3</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ma, J., Xu, X., Zhao, C., and Yan, P.: A review of atmospheric chemistry
research in China: Photochemical smog, haze pollution, and gas-aerosol
interactions, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1006–1026,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-1188-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-1188-7</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mao, J., Wang, L., Lu, C., Liu, J., Li, M., Tang, G., Ji, D., Zhang, N., and
Wang, Y.: Meteorological mechanism for a large-scale persistent severe ozone
pollution event over eastern China in 2017, J. Environ. Sci., 92, 187–199,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.019</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.: Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nuvolone, D., Petri, D., and Voller, F.: The effects of ozone on human
health, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 25, 8074–8088, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ouyang, S., Deng, T., Liu, R., Chen, J., He, G., Leung, J. C.-H., Wang, N., and Liu, S. C.: Impact of a subtropical high and a typhoon on a severe ozone pollution episode in the Pearl River Delta, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10751–10767, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10751-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10751-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Professional Committee of Ozone Pollution Control of Chinese Society for
Environmental Sciences: The Bluebook: Prevention and Control of Ozone
Pollution in China (2020), Science Press, Beijing, China, ISBN&thinsp;978-7-03-071664-4, 2022 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rowlinson, M. J., Rap, A., Arnold, S. R., Pope, R. J., Chipperfield, M. P., McNorton, J., Forster, P., Gordon, H., Pringle, K. J., Feng, W., Kerridge, B. J., Latter, B. L., and Siddans, R.: Impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on the interannual variability of methane and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8669–8686, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8669-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8669-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shafer, T. B. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Evaluation of chemical reaction
mechanisms for photochemical smog. Part 3. Sensitivity of EKMA (Empirical
Kinetic Modeling Approach) to chemical mechanism and input parameters, Final
Report, March 1984–February 1985, PB-85-210888/XAB, EPA-600-S3-85-042, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, U.S.A., <a href="https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/2000TMJ3.PDF?Dockey=2000TMJ3.PDF" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 January 2024), 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shao, M., Wang, W., Yuan, B., Parrish, D. D., Li, X., Lu, K., Wu, L., Wang,
X., Mo, Z., Yang, S., Peng, Y., Kuang, Y., Chen, W., Hu, M., Zeng, L., Su,
H., Cheng, Y., Zheng, J., and Zhang, Y.: Quantifying the role of PM<sub>2.5</sub>
dropping in variations of ground-level ozone: Inter-comparison between
Beijing and Los Angeles, Sci. Total Environ., 788, 147712,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147712" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147712</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, Y., Zhong, Z., Yi, L., Li, T., Chen, M., Wan, H., Wang, Y., and Zhong,
K.: Dependence of the relationship between the tropical cyclone track and
western Pacific subtropical high intensity on initial storm size: A
numerical investigation. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 11451–11467,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023716" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023716</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, T., Xue, L., Brimblecombe, P., Lam, Y. F., Li, L., and Zhang, L.:
Ozone pollution in China: A review of concentrations, meteorological
influences, chemical precursors, and effects, Sci. Total Environ., 575,
1582–1596, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.081</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Gao, W., Wang, S., Song, T., Gong, Z., Ji, D., Wang, L., Liu, Z.,
Tang, G., Huo, Y., Tian, S., Li, J., Li, M., Yang, Y., Chu, B.,
Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., He, H., Hao, J., Kulmala, M., Wang, Y.,
and Zhang, Y.: Contrasting trends of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and surface-ozone
concentrations in China from 2013 to 2017, Natl. Sci. Rev., 7, 1331–1339,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa032</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wei, X., Lam, K.-S., Cao, C., Li, H., and He, J.: Dynamics of the Typhoon
Haitang related high ozone episode over Hong Kong, Adv. Meteorol., 2016, 6089154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6089154" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6089154</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, Y., Liu, R., Li, Y., Dong, J., Huang, Z., Zheng, J., and Liu, S. C.: Contributions of meteorology and anthropogenic emissions to the trends in winter PM<sub>2.5</sub> in eastern China 2013–2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11945–11955, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11945-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11945-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xue, T., Zheng, Y., Geng, G., Xiao, Q., Meng, X., Wang, M., Li, X., Wu, N.,
Zhang, Q., and Zhu, T.: Estimating spatiotemporal variation in ambient ozone
exposure during 2013–2017 using a data-fusion model, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 54, 14877–14888, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03098</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, W., Chen, H., Wang, W., Wu, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., Zheng, J., and Chen,
D.: Modeling study of ozone source apportionment over the Pearl River Delta
in 2015, Environ. Pollut., 253, 393–402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.091</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Y., Liao, H., and Li, J.: Impacts of the East Asian summer monsoon on interannual variations of summertime surface-layer ozone concentrations over China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6867–6879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6867-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6867-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yin, Z., Cao, B., and Wang, H.: Dominant patterns of summer ozone pollution in eastern China and associated atmospheric circulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13933–13943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13933-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13933-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Wang, X., Shen, L., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Gui, K., Zhao, T., and Liao, H.: Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) trends in China, 2013–2018: separating contributions from anthropogenic emissions and meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11031–11041, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11031-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11031-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, R.: Relations of water vapor transport from Indian Monsoon with that
over East Asia and the summer rainfall in China, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 18, 1005–1017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03403519" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03403519</a>, 2001.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, S., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Du, X., Qu, L., Tang, W., Xu, J., and Meng, F.:
Formation processes and source contributions of ground-level ozone in urban
and suburban Beijing using the WRF-CMAQ modelling system, J. Environ. Sci.,
127, 753–766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.06.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.06.016</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Tao, M., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Chen, H., Cai, Z., and Konopka, P.: Long-term variations in ozone levels in the troposphere and lower stratosphere over Beijing: observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13343–13354, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13343-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13343-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, W., Lü, M., Lu, Q., Gao, B., Liang, X., Liu, M., Sun, J., Chen,
L., and Fan, S.: Effects of tropical cyclones on ozone pollution in the
Pearl River Delta in autumn, Environm. Sci., 43, 2957–2965,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202109169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202109169</a>, 2022 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, Z. and Wang, Y.: Influence of the West Pacific subtropical high on
surface ozone daily variability in summertime over eastern China, Atmos.
Environ., 170, 197–204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.024</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
