<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-24-1213-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>Radiative effect of thin cirrus clouds in the extratropical lowermost stratosphere and tropopause region</article-title><alt-title>Ultra-thin cirrus radiative effect</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Ultra-thin cirrus radiative effect}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.~Spang~et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Spang</surname><given-names>Reinhold</given-names></name>
          <email>r.spang@fz-juelich.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2483-5761</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>Rolf</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5024-9977</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Rap</surname><given-names>Alexandru</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2319-6769</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, IEK-7, 52425 Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Reinhold Spang (r.spang@fz-juelich.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>January</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1213</fpage><lpage>1230</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>December</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7</day><month>December</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 Reinhold Spang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e104">Cirrus clouds play an important role in the radiation budget of the Earth; nonetheless, the radiative effect of ultra-thin cirrus clouds in the tropopause region and in the lowermost stratosphere remains poorly constrained. These clouds have a small vertical extent and optical depth and are frequently neither observed even by sensitive sensors nor considered in climate model simulations. In addition, their short-wave (cooling) and long-wave (warming) radiative effects are often in approximate balance, and their net effect strongly depends on the shape and size of the cirrus particles. However, the CRyogenic Infrared Spectrometers and Telescopes for the Atmosphere instrument (CRISTA-2) allows ultra-thin cirrus clouds to be detected. Here we use CRISTA-2 observations in summer 1997 in the Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes together with the Suite Of Community RAdiative Transfer codes based on Edwards and Slingo (SOCRATES) radiative transfer model to calculate the radiative effect of observed ultra-thin cirrus. Using sensitivity simulations with different ice effective particle size and shape, we provide an estimate of the uncertainty in the radiative effect of ultra-thin cirrus in the extratropical lowermost stratosphere and tropopause region during summer and – by extrapolation of the summer results – for winter. Cloud top height and ice water content are based on CRISTA-2 measurements, while the cloud vertical thickness was predefined to be 0.5 or 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our results indicate that if the ice crystals of these thin cirrus clouds are assumed to be spherical, their net cloud radiative effect is generally positive (warming). In contrast, assuming aggregates or a hexagonal shape, their net radiative effect is generally negative (cooling) during summer months and very likely positive (warming) during winter. The radiative effect is in the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(0.1–0.01) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a realistic global cloud coverage of 10 %, similar to the magnitude of the contrail cirrus radiative forcing (of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The radiative effect is also dependent on the cloud vertical extent and consequently the optically thickness and effective radius of the particle size distribution (e.g. effective radius increase from 5 to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in a factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 smaller long- and short-wave effects, respectively). The properties of ultra-thin cirrus clouds in the lowermost stratosphere and tropopause region need to be better observed, and ultra-thin cirrus clouds need to be evaluated in climate model simulations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e192">Cirrus clouds are an important contributor to the radiation budget of the Earth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Despite recent progress in understanding cloud formation processes, aerosol–cloud interactions, and cirrus cloud radiative effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.2"/>, uncertainties for climate predictions are still large. From several positive feedbacks induced by doubling of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the cloud feedback has the largest spread between different general circulation models (GCMs) and thus is the most uncertain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.3"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1214?><p id="d1e215">The classification of different cirrus cloud classes with respect to optical thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) has been defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.4"/> and is based on lidar observations at visible wavelengths, where an optically thick cloud is defined for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, opaque cirrostratus for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, transparent or thin cirrus for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and subvisible cirrus (SVC) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. More recent observations with infrared limb sounders found optically even thinner cirrus clouds in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tropopause region and partly significantly above the tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.5"/>. These observations were obtained by space and airborne limb sounders. These clouds have been also detected by in situ particle measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.6"/> but are only observable to a moderate extent by space-borne lidars <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.7"/>. To better discriminate the optically extremely thin clouds from most of the cirrus defined above, these clouds are referred to in the following as ultra-thin cirrus (UTC), which is in line with the optical thickness definition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the ultra-thin tropical tropopause cirrus (UTTC) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.8"/> detected with airborne lidar and in situ particle measurements. The dehydration potential of UTTCs in the tropics was shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.9"/>. Cirrus clouds in the tropopause region may have a general and significant imprint on the water vapour amount in the stratosphere and consequently via radiation effects of the stratospheric water vapour on the surface temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.10"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e370">Assuming UTCs at the tropopause (TP) to be a common cloud type, the question arises about the radiative effect of these clouds – cooling or warming. The imprint of UTCs on the radiative net effect of cirrus is not well constrained due to the difficulties of characterising microphysical as well as macrophysical quantities of UTCs. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.11"/> reported a detailed analysis of the ice cloud radiative effect over a wide range of optical thickness based on space-borne Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) lidar and CloudSAT radar data. They computed the cloud radiative effect (CRE) of ice clouds for a global multiyear climatology of retrieved ice water content, effective radius, and extinction covering low-level optically thick to high-level thin cirrus clouds.  For the 2008 period, they found that the warming effect (21.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) induced by ice clouds trapping long-wave radiation exceeds their cooling effect (16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) caused by short-wave reflection, resulting in a net warming effect (5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) globally on the Earth–atmosphere system.  The study does not include the optically thinnest cirrus clouds like the lower end of optical thickness of UTCs. These are hard to detect for the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) on CALIPSO and may be underestimated in the dataset.</p>
      <p id="d1e427"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.12"/> showed the difficulties of observing optically very thin cirrus clouds around the tropopause with the CALIOPSO lidar in comparison to in situ particle measurements. The analysis suggests that a majority (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %) of SVCs around the tropopause (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) could be unaccounted for in studies using CALIPSO data. Consequently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.13"/> show only data for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e467">A similar study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.14"/> focuses not only on ice clouds but also on liquid, ice, multi-layer, and mixed-type clouds. Results of the global mean cloud radiative effects show a cooling effect only for ice, which is of comparable size to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.15"/> (3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.16"/> show that the difficulties for the detection of very thin cirrus clouds still exist in newer versions of the CALIOP cloud data products. They used ground-based Raman lidar measurements and found significant deficiencies in the occurrence frequency compared to CALIOP (global estimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e517">A more recent analysis of stratospheric ice clouds (SICs) based on the CALIOP cloud product shows rather high occurrence frequencies (2 %–20 %) nearly all over the globe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.17"/>, with maxima in the tropics but local maxima at midlatitudes in the storm track regions, with a preference for the tropics but reasonable occurrence frequencies at midlatitudes and high latitudes (2 %–10 %). In addition, the CALIOP shows less SICs at midlatitudes than the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) on the Envisat satellite (infrared (IR)-limb sounder) if both datasets are normalised in the tropics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.18"/>.  Cirrus cloud occurrence frequencies retrieved with the CRyogenic Infrared Spectrometers and Telescopes for the Atmosphere (CRISTA) instrument showed for the first time on a global scale significant numbers of cirrus occurrence at and above the tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.19"/> and present the IR limb sounder as one of the most sensitive measurements for the detection of cirrus clouds. Due to their better vertical resolution than MIPAS these data allow a better and more sophisticated quantification of the radiative effect of the proven optically thinnest cirrus clouds.</p>
      <p id="d1e529">So far it is unacknowledged whether climate models would need to consider UTCs as a separate cirrus type. Some of the models show the capability to form optically and vertically thin clouds around the tropopause for relatively coarse GCM resolutions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, fine-resolution cloud models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.21"/>, and global storm-resolving models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.22"/>. The global radiative effect of these clouds is an open question, and the validation of cloud occurrence frequencies and cloud fraction compared with global measurements is still needed.</p>
      <p id="d1e543">The present study is structured in the following way: Sect. 2 describes the instrument data and corresponding analyses and retrievals for setting up the most realistic optically thin cloud profiles in the tropopause region at midlatitudes and high latitudes. Section 3 presents radiative transfer calculations with the SOCRATES model and the results in context of the warming and cooling potential of the corresponding macro- and microphysical cirrus characteristics, followed by a discussion regarding limitations and uncertainties in the statistics as well as the estimation of the overall cloud radiation effect of the specific cirrus types.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e548">Regions of interest with high-altitude cirrus cloud coverage for 10 and 12 August 1997 with high-altitude cirrus clouds highlighted in the purple boxes. Cloud top heights (CTHs) are given in potential temperature coordinates by coloured dotted symbols. Symbols with a black circle highlight CTHs above the lapse rate tropopause based on ERA5 reanalysis data. Grey dots represent non-cloudy observations. Black lines show contours of the potential vorticity (PV) at 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude for 2, 3, and 6 PV units, highlighting dynamical features like Rossby wave breaking events. The maps are adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.23"/>, where more details are presented.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page1215?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Datasets and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>CRISTA instrument</title>
      <p id="d1e583">The CRISTA instrument was flown twice on space shuttle missions in 1994 and 1997 in a free-flyer configuration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.24"/>. During both missions the instrument made around 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of nearly global measurements in the mid-IR (5–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with a still today unprecedented horizontal resolution for a limb sounder. This was possible by the implementation of three telescopes with crossing viewing directions, which results in a rather dense measurement net (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) – even in the tropics (not presented). With an along-track sampling of 200/400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and three viewing directions the typical gaps between the orbits in the Equator and midlatitude region are filled with measurements. Additionally, the pointing capability of the satellite allowed CRISTA-2 to extend the latitudinal coverage up to 74<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and S away from the more restricted coverage defined by the orbit inclination of 57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (fixed value for CRISTA-1 coverage). The rather good vertical resolution and sampling of 1.5 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> helps cirrus clouds to be detected and the exact location with respect to the tropopause to be determined with quite a high accuracy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.25"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e647">The typical horizontal averaging along the line of sight of a limb sounder is in the order of 200–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the narrow field of view helps to keep this uncertainty in an adequate range, but this limits the accuracy of the retrieved limb ice water path (IWP) (see also Sect. 2.3 for details) from CRISTA.</p>
      <p id="d1e658">The exact position of the cloud along the limb path (line of sight) remains unknown in limb measurements and is not retrievable.  Simplified assumptions, e.g. a fixed horizontal cloud extent, are necessary to solve this issue in a retrieval process for target parameters like ice water content (IWC) or extinction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.26"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e666">Modified instruments like a limb imager allow substantial improvements in macroscopic cloud parameters with refined observation and retrieval techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.27"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. 2D/3D and tomographic retrieval techniques, </named-content></xref>. However, the CRISTA measurement capabilities are still unique for the limb IR technique. Extremely low cloud optical thicknesses are detectable, which results in a very high detection sensitivity for IWC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), vertical IWP (2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and extinction (8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.28"/>. The IWC value represents only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the CALIOP detection threshold <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.29"/>, and the extinction threshold represents the upper limit of the measurement range of IR limb sounders. For extinctions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the IR spectrum saturates and becomes optically thick in the limb, and the instrument loses sensitivity for optically thicker clouds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>SOCRATES radiation model</title>
      <p id="d1e860">Radiative flux calculations have been performed using the offline version of the SOCRATES (Suite Of Community RAdiative Transfer codes based on Edwards and Slingo) radiative transfer model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.30"/> with six bands in the short wave (SW), nine bands in the long wave (LW), and a delta-Eddington two-stream scattering solver at all wavelengths. This version has been used extensively in previous studies for calculating radiative effects from several atmospheric agents, including contrails <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.31"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. </named-content></xref>, water vapour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx30" id="text.32"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, ozone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx48" id="text.33"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, and aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.34"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e884">The model simulates ice cloud radiative effects using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.35"/> parameterisation for ice cloud bulk optical properties. Radiative flux calculations are performed for specified ice cloud fraction, ice crystal effective radius, and mass mixing ratio.  Our sensitivity simulations consider three different ice crystal shapes: spherical particles, hexagonal cylinders <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.36"/>, and aggregates based on 83 representative size distributions measured during the CEPEX campaign (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="altparen.37"/>). The<?pagebreak page1216?> diurnal variations in the SW are simulated by calculating the daily average SW radiative effects based on 24 instantaneous values (i.e. model runs with a 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time resolution) using pre-calculated solar zenith angles (SZAs) at the profile location.  Clear-sky conditions below the cloud base are assumed in the radiative calculations. For the sake of a simplified setup we ignored multi-layer clouds. This disregards a potentially reduced radiative input in the long wave from underlying cold cloud tops with lower temperatures than the surface. Changes in the albedo with time or geographical location are considered by an incorporated time-dependent 2D model of global albedo values.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Data preparation and model setup</title>
      <p id="d1e912">In order to guide the model in a realistic cloud parameter space, the simulations were set up based on the CRISTA-2 measurements. IWC and extinction estimates as well as accurate cloud top heights with respect to the tropopause height are retrieved from the satellite and meteorological reanalysis datasets. ECMWF's fifth-generation reanalysis, ERA5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.38"/>, is used for temperature, ozone, and specific humidity information at the profile location of CRISTA-2. Additionally, ERA5 pressure and geopotential height are applied to transform the vertical coordinate altitude for the satellite into pressure levels for the model. The derivation of lapse rate tropopause height and pressure from ERA5 follows the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.39"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e921">The cloud detection capabilities and the high detection sensitivity for cirrus clouds by IR limb sounders have been demonstrated in various studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.40"/> and for various instruments. The detection method is based on a colour ratio of the emissions in a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and minor ozone band at a wavenumber region around 792 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an atmospheric window region at 830 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The so-called cloud index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.41"/> is high (CI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4) for optically thin and cloud-free conditions and shrinks to values close to 1 when becoming optically thick in the limb direction. We applied a cloud index threshold of 3 for cloud top height detection, a robust threshold, applied and evaluated in various studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.42"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. </named-content></xref>.  The method was developed originally for the CRISTA satellite instrument but has been successfully adopted due to its high efficiency to other IR limb sounders, like the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) instrument <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.43"/> on the Envisat satellite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.44"/> or more recently on airborne instruments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.45"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e989">The CRISTA observations were used to define the macro- and microphysical cloud parameter required for the SOCRATES run. In total 161 profiles with cirrus clouds around the tropopause were selected from the CRISTA-2 dataset in the regions highlighted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. These regions are restricted to latitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, which are not well covered by in situ instruments. The clouds formed under a specific dynamical situation where a Rossby wave breaking event over the Atlantic transported a high water vapour amount to high latitudes over Europe and triggered the ice cloud formation in regions with sufficiently cold temperatures, although the temperatures were usually too warm and additional temperature fluctuation by gravity waves would be necessary but were not resolved in the applied reanalysis data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.46"/>. To keep the number of modelled profiles for our study at a reasonable size as well as to choose well-characterised UTC events, we limited our analysis to 2 d and defined regions as highlighted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. This restriction allows sensitivity studies over various micro- and macrophysical parameters with the SOCRATES model.</p>
      <p id="d1e1015"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.47"/> showed that the cloud index value in the optically thin part of cloud measurement correlates well with the limb-integrated surface area density along the limb path (ADP) (equivalent to a limb IWP), and they generated lookup tables for various altitudes and latitudes. In addition, taking the effective radius of the particles into account (predefined for the model runs with 5, 10, and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), it is possible to estimate the mean IWC along the line of sight under the assumption of a tangent height layer homogeneously covered by the cirrus cloud.  A constant path length through the cloud of 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been applied. Usually, the path length depends on the tangent point altitude with respect to the real cloud top (not the detected instrument-based cloud top height; because of the limited vertical resolution and sampling of the instrument, the real cloud top height (CTH) can be lower or higher than the detected CTH). In addition, the cloud path length depends on the size of the field of view. Consequently, for a horizontally and/or vertically large cloud extent the limb cloud path can become extremely long (150 to 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1 to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, at vertical resolution). In the current analysis, we are mainly interested in the cloud top region, up to 1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the cloud top, where the cloud is usually still optically thin, and an effective cloud path of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a reasonable assumption for the rather small field of view of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of CRISTA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.48"/>.  Finally, it needs to be highlighted that the cloud base height is difficult to retrieve for limb measurements. Obviously, for optically thick clouds in the limb (and nadir) direction, the cloud bottom is not visible. In addition, for optically thinner clouds, limited altitude coverage (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud base height, CBH) makes it impossible to determine a CBH for many limb sounders (e.g. MIPAS, CRISTA) especially for vertically thick clouds. Consequently, for the sensitivity study with SOCRATES we decided to use predefined cloud thicknesses (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.5 and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1129"><bold>(a)</bold> Input profiles for the SOCRATES model runs for 9 August 1997 13:47:13 GMT, 68.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 23.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E  with temperature (black) and SH (light blue) from ERA5, IWC (blue) retrieved for CRISTA-2 (like SH presented in kg/kg), and additional information like the cloud index profile for cloud detection (CI, in green – dimensionless – and threshold value CI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 indicated by a dashed green line) as well as cloud top and base height (blue dashed line) and ERA5-based lapse rate tropopause (red dash–dotted line) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.49"><named-content content-type="pre">following</named-content></xref>. All information is interpolated on the SOCRATES pressure grid. <bold>(b)</bold> Output profiles for spherical particles of SW (blue) and LW (green) all-sky and clear-sky fluxes by the model. The difference between all-sky and clear-sky (SW in black and LW in red) and the sum of SW and LW (purple) are shown by dash–dotted lines and are scaled by a factor of 100. Top of atmosphere total radiative effect results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CRE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CRE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1249">For a newer and airborne-based IR limb sounder, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.50"/> showed the ability to retrieve CTH and CBH. The predefined thicknesses for the SOCRATES study are in the range of the maximum of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> probability density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is in the maximum range of the UTC thickness detected by the<?pagebreak page1217?> airborne instrument, where roughly 5 %–6 % of the events show a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1331">The following procedure is applied for the interpolation of the CRISTA IWC to the SOCRATES grid. If more than one tangent height in a single profile is affected by clouds, then the values (IWC) are used for the linear interpolation on the vertical grid down to cloud bottom altitude. If the predefined cloud thickness overlaps the minimum altitude of the measurement with IWC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, then the model levels of the cloud are kept constant with the IWC of the lowest altitude.</p>
      <p id="d1e1341">In summary, IWC is estimated from the retrieved CTH and ADP or the ADP-equivalent limb IWP, where the effective radius and cloud thickness are predefined (0.5 and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The CRISTA measurements were taken in August 1997, which means under rather high solar zenith angle conditions with many hours of sunlight. For contrast we mirrored the CRISTA observation to February conditions to simulate contrapuntal winter-like events with respect to meteorological (ERA5) and solar conditions and used these for a rough estimate of the seasonal dependence of the CRE of UTCs (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e1354">Particle shape and roughness are very important parameters for correctly modelling the radiative effect of cirrus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.51"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>. Cirrus particles can have very complex particle shapes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.52"><named-content content-type="pre">for a review see</named-content></xref>. Various studies show less complexity for the cold cloud top regions, especially in the tropical tropopause region, where quasi-spherical particles with radii smaller than 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seem to dominate the particle size distribution and where complex ice aggregates are less frequently observed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.53"/>. It is reasonable that cirrus at the tropopause and in the lower stratosphere (cloud top) at midlatitudes and high latitude also have less complex shapes than optically thick ice clouds in the free troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e1380">In this study we use the properties of three particle shapes: (a) aggregates, a specific composition of ice crystal habits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.54"/>; (b) spherical ice particles as a simplification for the in situ observed quasi-spherical particles in the cloud top region, which are typically best described by droxtals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.55"/> or Chebyshev particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.56"/>; and (c) hexagonal cylinders (or columns or prisms). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.57"/> reported that the ice crystals observed in high cirrus clouds (with cloud temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were predominantly hollow or solid hexagonal columns.  As described for example by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.58"/> the parameterised optical properties for the hexagonal ice particle are based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.59"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.60"/> over a parameterised bimodal particle size distribution from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.61"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1437">CRISTA-based ice water path <bold>(a)</bold> and optical depth <bold>(b)</bold> distribution applied to the SOCRATES runs for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> =0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red) and all together (black). <bold>(c)</bold> PDF of the mean cloud temperature used in the study for August conditions (ERA5 1997 data).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1218?><p id="d1e1499">Cloud optical depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is an important parameter when investigating the cooling or warming potential of cirrus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.62"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. We computed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the CRISTA cirrus cloud detection by the CI–IWC relation prepared in lookup tables of ADP or limb IWP versus CI with respect to cloud altitude and a further correlation between extinction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> const <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IWC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with const <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, IWC in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in micrometres, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.63"/>. Finally, a simple integration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the cloud layer thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) results in the vertical optical depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is used for the SOCRATES input (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e1720">The vertical information content of the ice parameters measured by CRISTA is limited. If more than one tangent height is affected by clouds in a single profile, then the values (IWC and consequently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are used for the interpolation on the vertical grid of SOCRATES. If the predefined cloud thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overlaps the minimum altitude of CRISTA, then the model levels of the cloud are kept constant with the IWC of the lowest altitude.  The CRISTA-based optical depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b) covers the full range of UTCs from extremely low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to a maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the maximum is still in the range of SVCs.</p>
      <p id="d1e1778">For a crosscheck of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> approach we also followed an estimation method for the optical depth by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IWP</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ICE</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.64"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in micrometres and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ICE</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the mass density of ice in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Probability density functions (PDFs) of retrieved (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a) and estimated (not shown) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> look very similar, which gives us confidence that the retrieved IWC, IWP, and extinctions retrieved from CRISTA are in a reasonable range. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a and b show the distribution of IWP and optical thickness retrieved from the CRISTA data. The similarities in the PDFs highlight the close link between both parameters.</p>
      <p id="d1e1879">A summary of all different model scenarios (36 in total) for SOCRATES is presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> together with the mean model results of the cloud radiative effect of all CRISTA profiles with cirrus clouds in the regions of interest (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) accounted for in the simulations. An example of the model input profiles (cloud index, temperature, specific humidity, and IWC) and the output profiles of SW and LW flux profiles for all-sky (as) cloudy and clear-sky (cs) non-cloudy conditions is presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The CRE is defined as the sum of SW and LW effect of the all-sky minus clear-sky fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the top of the atmosphere in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M134" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CRE</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SW</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>as</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SW</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>cs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>LW</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>as</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>LW</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>cs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1981">Median cloud radiative effect (bold letters) of 161 cirrus cloud profiles, as well as separated LW and SW effects at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for various scenarios of the SOCRATES runs. An identifier for the corresponding model setup is given in italic (scene ID).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.94}[.94]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scenario:</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aug</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Aug</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Feb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Feb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Month</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">shape/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">cloud depth</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hex/5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>33</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>34</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>35</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>36</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>Scene ID</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.25</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>2.18</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.04</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.59</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>CRE</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Agg/5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>25</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>26</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>27</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>28</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>Scene ID</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.29</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>2.43</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.06</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.81</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>CRE</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sph/5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>29</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>30</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>31</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>32</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>Scene ID</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.35</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>2.28</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.26</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.86</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>CRE</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hex/10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>17</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>18</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>19</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>20</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>Scene ID</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.05</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.48</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.08</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.75</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>CRE</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Agg/10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>1</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>2</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>3</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>4</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>Scene ID</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.06</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.64</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.09</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.81</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>CRE</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sph/10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>9</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>10</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>11</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>12</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>Scene ID</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.17</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>1.15</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.13</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.93</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>CRE</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hex/30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>21</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>22</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>23</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>24</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>Scene ID</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.00</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.01</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.04</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.33</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>CRE</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Agg/30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>5</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>6</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>7</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>8</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>Scene ID</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>-0.01</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>-0.10</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.04</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.33</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>CRE</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sph/30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>13</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>14</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>15</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>16</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>Scene ID</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.06</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.37</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.04</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.31</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>CRE</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3310">LW, SW, and total flux (CRE) are saturating above the cloud top (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with virtually constant values (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b), and a simple definition of the top of atmosphere (ToA) radiative effect is applicable by means of the pressure levels 20 to 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The latter pressure value is the minimum pressure level in the model run.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1219?><p id="d1e3338">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a gives an overview of the range and occurrence in the vertical IWP from the CRISTA estimates. The obviously very different vertical cloud thicknesses of 0.5 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> result in a separation in the PDF of IWP with very small IWPs between 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud layers and an IWP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extended cirrus. All modelled and observed cirrus clouds are optically thin in the limb and nadir direction and will be invisible for most passive nadir instruments.  The lowest IWP values are equivalent to an IWC of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is 1 order of magnitude larger than the detection sensitivity of IR limb sounders <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.65"/> and close to the so far lowest IWC values observed in in situ measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.66"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, </named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3529">The mean temperature of the modelled cloud layers is in the range of 210 to 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for August (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c), peaking around 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is a typical tropopause temperature at this time of the season (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.67"/>).  We applied no pre-selection based on temperature for the CRISTA cloud detection; consequently a few (11 out of 162) lower-altitude and warm cirrus are part of the SOCRATES calculations and are visible in the presented PDF at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These events have been detected 2 to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the tropopause but at cloud top heights of 8 to 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is relatively close to the typical tropopause height at the relatively high latitudes (60–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) of the measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e3603">February temperature profiles have been selected from ERA5 and are not observationally based (longitude and latitude of the August cloud observations). The corresponding estimated cloud temperatures are lower than in August (the maximum of the probability distribution peaks at 210 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; not shown). Although the selected temperature profiles for February may not be realistic for the microphysical formation of cirrus (e.g. frequent CTHs are modelled in February significantly above the tropopause), it seams reasonable to use the profiles for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, specific humidity (SH), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to define the background atmosphere conditions for the February scenarios in SOCRATES. However, these February simulations are only intended to provide rough CRE estimates for the discussion on the overall differences between summer and winter conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3635">PDFs of the CRE for various setups of the SOCRATES runs <bold>(a)</bold> for 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effective radius of the particles for spherical and hexagonal particle shapes (see colour code) and <bold>(b)</bold> with effective radius of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for hexagonal and spherical particles, both for August conditions and <bold>(c)</bold> February background atmosphere for spherical and hexagonal particles. Separation in cloud thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in blue and red for spherical/hexagonal/spherical <bold>(a–c)</bold> (the total of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is highlighted in black and labelled ALL) in comparison to hexagonal/aggregates/hexagonal particles (0.5 and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in light blue and orange).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Cloud radiative effect of optically thin cirrus</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Model results for selected setups</title>
      <p id="d1e3777">An overview of the CRE of the individual profiles is presented for selected model setups in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> by probability density functions (PDFs) for various <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particle shapes (colour-coded) and effective radius as well as for August (a, b) and February (c) background conditions. Relatively broad distributions of a negative CRE for hexagonal particles from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 to 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were found for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, changing to a positive CRE for spherical particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a) for an effective radius of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Overall, our simulations indicate contrasting behaviours between spherical and hexagonal particle shapes and between August and February conditions. Very similar distribution were found between hexagonal shapes and aggregates as shown for the large mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but with similar agreement for both other size modes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b).  Finally, for the small mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and February conditions, the PDFs of spherical and hexagonal particles are shifted to positive CREs; only a minor contribution of the scenarios with hexagonal particles is able to produce a net cooling effect. The results are discussed in more detail in the discussion of Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3945">Cloud radiative effect for cirrus (LW and SW colour-coded as blue/purple and red/orange (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 and 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and total as black) with respect to optical depth (<bold>a</bold>, <bold>c</bold>, <bold>e</bold>, and <bold>g</bold>) and LW versus SW radiative effect (<bold>b</bold>, <bold>d</bold>, <bold>f</bold>, and <bold>h</bold>). <bold>(a, b)</bold> Aggregates, <bold>(c, d)</bold> spherical, and <bold>(e, f)</bold> hexagonal particle shape with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for August conditions as well as <bold>(g, h)</bold> hexagonal particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The black vertical line in the panels of the left column highlights CRE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Attention: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis range is changed for <bold>(h)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4109">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> gives a better representation of the SW, LW, and net effect with respect to the optical depth (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) of the modelled clouds. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, c, e, and g show the CRE versus<?pagebreak page1220?> optical depth for four and eight model scenes – always for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and August conditions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aggregate (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a and b), spherical (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c and d), and hexagonal particle shapes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>e and f) – and finally for the large particle mode 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hexagonal particle shape. The exponential growth of SW and LW effects with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obvious for all setups and especially well pronounced for the combination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aggregates as well as hexagonal particles.  SW and LW effects are nearly in balance and changes in shape or radius can significantly change the net effect (black symbols in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, c, e, and g) from cooling to warming and vice versa. The interplay of SW and LW effects is visualised in more detail in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b, d, f, and h. Deviations from the one-to-one line highlight the warming (above) and cooling (below) of the net cirrus CRE for each single cloud event modelled with SOCRATES. Smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> induces a very similar ratio between LW and SW effects, illustrated by rather similar gradients and only smaller amplitudes in the LW–SW correlation.  For summer conditions and particle shapes of aggregates the short-wave scattering effect can reach a very large cooling (extended day length), especially for larger optical depth values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01). This results in 10 scenarios (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>: scenes 01, 02, 05, 06, 17, 18, 25, 26, 33, 34) with an overall mean cooling potential (aggregates for 5, 10, and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; hexagonal shape only for 5 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a–d.  However, even smaller effective radii (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) will result in even larger cooling effects for aggregates or similar complex particle shapes. For optically thin cirrus clouds (SVC and/or UTC), in situ measurements show typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and quasi-spherical shapes with some plates and rare trigonal shapes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.68"/>. Thus, aggregates are not a very plausible particle shape for the optically thinnest cirrus clouds observed by CRISTA.</p>
      <p id="d1e4339">For spheres (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c and d) compared to aggregates (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a and b) or hexagonal particles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>e and f) the SW scattering efficiency is less pronounced and the cooling effect is generally smaller in amplitude and usually smaller than the LW warming for spheres. Hexagonally shaped particles are more realistic for high-altitude cirrus cloud particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.69"/>, although they are usually observed at colder temperatures and not necessarily generally representative of UTCs at midlatitudes and high latitudes. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>e represents an example of the optical depth versus CRE and the LW versus the SW effect for 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results are very similar to the aggregates, although the amplitude for SW, LW, and total CRE are slightly larger for aggregates than for hexagonal particles. As a consequence, for hexagonal ice crystal shapes a few more profiles with LW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SW are present (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>f and h). The larger effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>h and f) results in significantly smaller surface area densities, which reduces the SW effect. The LW can now dominate the SW more frequently and results for nearly 50 % of the profiles in a net warming effect (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>h) compared to the 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> runs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>f) with cooling for most of the profiles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4420">Cloud radiative effect for cirrus (LW and SW colour-coded as blue/purple and red/orange (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2/0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and total as black) with respect to optical depth in August with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for hexagonal <bold>(a)</bold> and spherical particles <bold>(b)</bold>. Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> also show hexagonal and spherical particles for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but for February conditions (for details see text). The black vertical line in the figures highlights CRE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note the factor 2 expanded CRE range in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4554">In addition, we present in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> the CRE versus optical depth relation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of hexagonal and spherical particles for August and February conditions. The small mode again shows opposing effects for hexagonal and spherical particles, here with an extremely high SW cooling (up to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for hexagonal particles. The latter results in a net cooling for all profiles, and the situation is the opposite for spheres, where the majority creates a net warming effect.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1221?><p id="d1e4615">There is a strong <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dependency on the SW effect, where larger particles correspond to smaller surface area densities for constant IWC and consequently smaller SW scattering. Generally, 0.5 and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud layers behave very similarly to changes in the parameter settings (LW is orange and red and SW lilac and blue in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), whereby <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a significant factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 smaller in the CRE for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 than for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud layers.</p>
      <p id="d1e4698">In addition, we tried to find a relation between the CRE and macrophysical parameters like the distance to the tropopause as well the temperature difference between cloud top and surface temperature.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> presents only results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5 and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differ only by an enhancement and reduction in magnitude, respectively, and no change in sign) for spherical (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a) and hexagonal (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b) particles for cloud top pressure minus tropopause pressure in pressure altitudes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4749">Cloud radiative effect with respect to the distance to the tropopause cloud top pressure minus tropopause pressure (CTP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TPP) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spherical <bold>(a)</bold> and hexagonal <bold>(b)</bold> particle shape. Vertical line in middle highlights CRE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4807">Although the interquartile range of the median values of the CRE are rather large (error bars), for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> there is a distinctive correlation starting a few kilometres (2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) below the TP up to 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the tropopause. In<?pagebreak page1222?> addition, for spherical as well for hexagonal particle shapes, the median indicates a weak negative gradient with cooling in the CRE with larger distances above the tropopause (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> events show a negative gradient but with smaller tendencies in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the tropopause. The gradient looks for aggregates and hexagonal particle shapes as opposed to spheres. Below the tropopause (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≃</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the gradient is negative for most of the scenarios.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4932">Cloud radiative effect with respect to cloud top temperature minus surface temperature (based on ERA5) for August and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hexagonal <bold>(a)</bold> and spherical <bold>(b)</bold> particle shapes as well as for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spheres <bold>(c)</bold> and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aggregates <bold>(d)</bold>. Cloud thickness is highlighted in blue for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and red for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All numbers for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> events are scaled by a factor 4 in the CRE domain for simpler comparison. Median CREs for a temperature grid with a width of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are superimposed by large symbols and error bars for the interquartile range.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5087">Mean cloud temperature should have an imprint on the CRE, because the emitted radiation of the cloud is directly related to the temperature. One of the major radiation effects by high cold clouds is a warming potential due to the emission at lower temperatures around the tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.70"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.  The cloud radiative effect with respect to the cloud top temperature (CTT) minus surface temperature at the profile location is presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. CTT is not directly related to the LW effect of clouds; it is the temperature difference between the cloud top and the LW-emitting layer in the atmosphere, an underlying cloud layer, or the surface temperature under clear-sky conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.71"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.  In addition, the optical thickness of the cloud layer is also an important parameter in this representation; the smaller the optical thickness, the smaller the LW effect and consequently the smaller and less significant the sensitivity to the temperature difference. A completely transparent cloud (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has a negligible LW effect. This appears nicely in the different behaviour of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scenarios in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, where the vertically thin clouds (red, scaled by a factor 4) show no or only weak trends in the CRE with respect to the temperature difference. For all particle sizes and shapes for the vertically thick and consequently optically thicker cloud layers (blue) a linear relation becomes obvious; the smaller the negative temperature difference, the smaller CRE. Although the scatter – the error bars represent the interquartile range – is sometimes even large for the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud cases, this appears only for temperature bins with small event numbers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In contrast, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scenes always show a relatively large interquartile range with respect to the median and only a weak indication of similar trends (significantly smaller gradients) like in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scenes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5243">Cloud radiative effect with respect to optical depth <bold>(a, b)</bold> for August and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spherical and aggregate particle shapes on the left and right and <bold>(c, d)</bold> with hexagonal particle shapes for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and August conditions as well as February for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The error bars represent the interquartile range of the corresponding vertical grid box.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/1213/2024/acp-24-1213-2024-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1223?><p id="d1e5344">The CRE versus optical depth similar to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> is presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> with an additional binning along the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis and the computation of median and percentiles per bin for the CRE. The median and the interquartile range are presented, with the interquartile range as an error measure to better visualise the variability for constant optical depth. The median and interquartile range are better suited than the mean and standard deviation to characterise data with high internal variability, extreme outliers, or skewed distributions. For spherical particles, the median follows the exponential increase in the CRE from the 0.5 and relatively small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scenarios up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the CRE up to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereby the aggregates show nearly the opposite behaviour in the CRE, with a smaller amplitude and larger scatter (interquartile range error bars).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Statistics of modelled cloud radiative effect</title>
      <p id="d1e5409">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> summarises all SOCRATES setups and mean results on LW, SW and net radiative effect. The median values of the selected areas (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) give distinctive tendencies of the overall cloud warming or cooling effect for the UTCs.  In total 161 cloud profiles have been selected from the CRISTA-2 data and represent variable conditions where optical thin cirrus clouds were formed at and above the tropopause north of 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N.  Using more realistic cloud occurrence frequencies would allow a more realistic assessment of the CRE of the UTCs.</p>
      <p id="d1e5425">The LW effect of scattering and trapping the IR radiation back into the direction of the ground dominates the SW cooling effect for most of the model scenes.  For spherical particle shapes, both scenarios, winter and summer, result in a net warming effect in the range of 0.17 to 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (August) and 0.13 to 0.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (February) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These are generally larger values than the mean effects for aggregates or hexagonal particles, especially for summer conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e5490">The LW warming is even more effective for larger particles where the resulting smaller surface area densities reduce the SW cooling.  However, the SW cooling is also more effective for larger particles.  Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> shows this fact for all simulations of spherical particles: for example, a between 10 and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effective radius has a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 times higher SW and LW effect for the 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effective radius (e.g. factor 6 higher for 30 to 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e5532">The short-wave scattering effect depends strongly on the solar zenith angle and the duration of sunlit hours. For winter conditions the mean SW effect cannot compensate for the LW effect for aggregates and spheres, whereas for summer conditions the aggregates can change the sign for the CRE from warming to cooling.  SW is enlarged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.63 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and results in a mean CRE of +0.81 (February) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (August).  This change in sign – from warming to cooling – does not appear for spherical particles. In contrast to aggregates the CRE stays positive from winter to summer and even shows a slightly enhanced CRE (e.g. 0.93 to 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The SW effect of spherical particles is by far smaller than the one for aggregates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Winter condition experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e5660">As mentioned in Sect. 2, we used the profiles for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, SH, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to define the background atmosphere conditions for February scenarios in SOCRATES. The CRISTA-based input (CTH and IWC, indirectly IWP, extinction, optical depth) are simply mirrored into these February conditions. While these simulations do not represent actual February UTC CRE simulations, they are intended to provide a basis for discussions on the more general differences between summer and winter conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e5681">For winter (February) conditions the short-wave cooling becomes smaller due to reduced daylight hours (taking also into account the rather high geographical latitudes), which results in a general warming effect for all particle shapes and effective radii. The change from cooling to warming for aggregates and hexagonal particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c and d. In addition, the albedo varies for this change from a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15 to 0.5, which has a drastic effect on the LW radiance input coming from below the cloud. Similar to an underlying cloud, this can have a significant effect on the net SW or LW effect.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1224?><p id="d1e5729">The change from net cooling to warming simulated for February conditions has been compared with the long time record analysis of CALIPSO by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.72"/>. It should be recapped that the cloud optical thicknesses <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 (mainly UTCs) only play a minor role for the total CALIPSO-based CRE. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.73"/> showed the zonal mean seasonal variation in the total SW, LW, and net effect of ice cloud radiative effect, latitudinally resolved (Fig. 4). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 to 75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N significant changes over the seasonal cycle, from cooling in summer (March to August) to warming in winter (September to February), are observable. A net warming effect of 10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is observed during winter, and the net cooling effect can exceed 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in southern midlatitudes to high latitudes and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the northern midlatitudes to high latitudes. In the tropics, a strong net warming effect (10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) persists over the whole year, mainly caused by high ice clouds with negligible seasonal variation in the zonal mean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.74"/>. Consequently, the CALIPSO results are in line with the simplified mirroring of the CRISTA measurements from summer to winter conditions for UTCs, while the amplitudes for UTCs are obviously much smaller, which is mainly a result of the different optical thicknesses of UTCs compared to ice clouds observed by CALIPSO. The tendency towards a change from cooling to warming is identical.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Uncertainty in cloud thickness</title>
      <p id="d1e5841">Various settings of UTC clouds have been modelled with SOCRATES for a first quantification of the cloud radiative effect of UTCs at midlatitudes and high latitudes. The original CRISTA-2 data have already been analysed regarding the cloud occurrence with respect to the tropopause by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.75"/>. However, the CRE was not analysed for these unexpected observations of UTCs well above the tropopause and with unprecedented high occurrence rates at high northern latitudes. A comprehensive study was missing where the cooling or warming potential of these clouds is investigated.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1225?><p id="d1e5847">For larger effective radii as well for vertical thinner cloud layers (0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) we observe smaller cooling and warming effects in the mean SOCRATES results (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SSx1"/>). The determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be an important parameter for a better future quantification of the CRE of UTCs. So far, there is no validated statistical information of the cloud thickness of UTCs available. Although the CALIOP data may miss a rather large part of the optically thinnest UTCs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.76"/>, the dataset is still the best set available for such an analysis. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx72" id="text.77"/> have analysed the cloud occurrence of stratospheric ice clouds (SICs) based on CALIOP data products. The studies by Zou and colleagues have not focused on the vertical extent of these clouds. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.78"/> showed for midlatitudes that the IR limb measurements by MIPAS give higher occurrence rates on SICs than CALIOP if both cloud occurrence frequencies are normalised in the tropics. This supports the notion that IR limb sounders are under specific conditions more sensitive in the detection of cirrus cloud than recent lidar in-space instruments. This circumstance was already discussed in earlier studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.79"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5885">The best information on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of UTCs retrieved from IR limb measurements is the more recent analysis of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.80"/> with data from the airborne GLORIA (Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere) instrument <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.81"/> during the airborne campaign WISE (Wave-driven ISentropic Exchange) in the North Atlantic in September and October 2017.  Due to the excellent vertical resolution and fine sampling using a 2D infrared imaging detector, the data achieve a vertical sampling and resolution of 140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the first time cloud bottom information was retrieved from extinction profiles.</p>
      <p id="d1e5912">The analysis shows that in the region investigated by WISE there is a maximum likelihood in cloud extent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 500–625 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with likelihoods for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of less than 25 % of the peak likelihood and in total only 10 % of all measured cloud events <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.82"><named-content content-type="post">Fig. 8a</named-content></xref>.  Note that for a typical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.5 to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a lower CRE is calculated than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>).  Generally, optical depth is a good estimator for the strength of the CRE even at very low optical depth, but the cloud vertical extent is obviously a critical parameter for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the CRE, and there seams a functional relation between the CRE, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Estimates of UTC fraction and global CRE</title>
      <p id="d1e6044">Cloud top heights with respect to the tropopause show a week correlation with the CRE in the SOCRATES results especially below the tropopause with a decrease in mean CRE with warmer cloud temperatures (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>).  The variability in the net effect is very large (profile-to-profile variability), which makes it difficult to draw a final conclusion on a mean effect with the cloud top position with respect to the tropopause, but we found clear indications of an enhanced warming effect for optically thicker events at higher altitudes with respect to the tropopause.</p>
      <p id="d1e6049">The CRE is not only affected by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the atmospheric background conditions (temperature profile, CTH location, surface albedo, microphysical quantities) can also result in situations where even similar background conditions and constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> result in a very different CRE. This makes the prediction of a net cooling or warming difficult. Even LW and SW effects turn out to be very different depending on the optical depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). Global measurements with a sophisticated occurrence frequency statistic, where the cloud detection is weighted with the area covered by clouds, are<?pagebreak page1226?> necessary. The subsequent radiation model runs would then allow the overall CRE of UTCs in the tropopause region to be better quantified.</p>
      <p id="d1e6068"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.83"/> followed a very similar procedure with the combined CALIPSO–CloudSAT ice cloud data products (DARDAR: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.84"/>; 2C-ICE: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="altparen.85"/>). These data may not include the correct number of UTCs due to a lack of detection sensitivity (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S1"/>) and will consequently to some extent underestimate the total cloud coverage and occurrence of cirrus clouds. The results achieved by Hong and colleagues are presented for ice cloud optical depths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a value where the limb measurements are starting to saturate. The analysis of Hong and colleagues lacks the optically thinnest range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, where IR limb sounders are most sensitive. A combination of IR limb and space lidar measurements would be an excellent combination to cover the full range of the optical depth of cirrus clouds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20) for a comprehensive view on the radiative effect of cirrus clouds. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.86"/> argue that subvisual cirrus (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) display only weak SW and LW radiative effects because of their infrequent occurrence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.87"><named-content content-type="pre">global mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %; </named-content></xref>, and this results in a global mean value of CRE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.88"><named-content content-type="post">Table 4,</named-content></xref>. However, as already argued above, the applied cloud dataset misses a significant number of UTCs and the overall radiative effect for SVCs and UTCs is underestimated. Our study shows that the radiative effect of these additional UTCs will be small but relevant, in the range of the CRE median of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.43 to 2.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) assuming a 100 % occurrence rate (with a single profile maximum of net cooling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and net warming of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). For summer conditions only aggregates and hexagonal particles have the potential for a net cooling effect. If a more realistic UTC coverage of 10 (20) % is assumed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.89"/>, the CRE is reduced to a still not irrelevant range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.24 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.48) to 0.22 (0.45) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6375">The numbers of the radiative forcing caused by UTC calculated here can be put into perspective by the radiative forcing determined for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and other greenhouse gases.  In a similarly designed study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.90"/> analysed SW, LW, and the net radiative effect of a stratospheric water vapour (SWV) enhancement as well as the effects of contrail cirrus in a comparison of various radiative transport models. An overall global change in SWV from 3.0 to 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resulted in a net radiative forcing (LW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SW) of 0.22 to 0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on the specific model. This is a similar value and range as for the 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particle size in the CRE results for UTCs presented above (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), with a mean 100 % cloud-cover – clearly an overestimate of the real atmosphere. A typical contrail cirrus with an optical depth of 0.3 and a 100 % coverage resulted in a CRE of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a high SZA (75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a positive CRE of 12–23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a low SZA (30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Similar to the UTCs focused on for this study, the CRE of optically thin contrails is very sensitive to the SZA; depending on the sunlight hours and the maximum SZA, the overall CRE can change from negative to positive effects.  Finally, Myhre and colleagues made a more realistic estimate of the global coverage of contrails and the resulting CRE. Four models deliver a rather good consistency in the range of 9.3 to 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mW</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (warming), which is significantly smaller than the estimates found above for 10 % and 20 % coverage of global UTCs with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Only if we further reduce the global coverage to 1 % (to be consistent with the contrails coverage), is the CRE of UTCs in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 to 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mW</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 to 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mW</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the warming of hexagonal shapes and aggregates fits well with the contrails.  However, these estimates indicate a significantly larger CRE for UTCs than contrails.</p>
      <p id="d1e6636">Although the presented study specifies only first estimates of the CRE under various conditions, the results presented here show the priority to better constrain the number (coverage) and vertical thickness of UTCs in the lower stratosphere and tropopause region. This would help to determine how important it is to consider UTCs in future climate model simulations. This would also help to prove whether UTCs are at least to some extent considered in the current very common cloud dataset composed of radar and lidar space measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.91"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Possible impact on circulation patterns</title>
      <p id="d1e6652">Such optically thin clouds, like those reported above, may be important for the radiation budget of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere and thus for modifying the mean tropopause temperature. They may thus indirectly control the amount of water vapour entering the stratosphere and influence circulation pattern. Radiative vertical flux profiles could be converted to heating rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.92"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, and a large cloud heating rate was shown to strongly modulate circulation patterns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.93"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This activity could be the topic of follow-up work of the present study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6674">The present study reports the radiative effect of optically ultra-thin cirrus clouds.  Our sensitivity simulations with different ice particle sizes and shapes for those clouds provide an uncertainty range for their CRE during both summer and winter months. Cloud top height and ice water content are based on CRISTA-2 retrievals, while the cloud vertical thicknesses were assumed to be 0.5 or 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most of the model scenarios (August and February) result in a positive cloud radiative effect (warming) in the mean range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.43 to 2.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for August conditions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) and 100 % cloud coverage.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the leading parameter for maximum cooling and warming; the smaller the particles, the larger the amplitude of the CRE.  Ice aggregates and hexagonal particles showed the ability to change the sign of the CRE from cooling to warming when estimating February conditions with<?pagebreak page1227?> a simplified approach by mirroring the CRISTA observation onto the winter atmosphere and considering albedo changes.  Summer conditions with extended sunlit hours produce large cooling rates over the day so that the SW cooling effect can dominate the LW warming effect, although spherical particles always show a mean net warming effect.</p>
      <p id="d1e6722">Overall, the cooling and warming effects are nearly in balance for UTCs and the typical uncertainties in the various input parameters of the radiative transport calculation (e.g. particle type, effective radius, or cloud layer thickness) makes it problematic to reliably quantify the net radiative effect. So far UTCs are an unnoticed cirrus cloud type in many fields, from cloud microphysical modelling to the parameterisation of the formation processes for various types in global models. Further investigations on the particle shape, effective radius, cloud coverage, and vertical thickness of UTCs are suggested here to minimise the uncertainties in the radiative transport calculations. Finally, such work should allow a more accurate quantification of the cooling or warming potential of UTCs.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6729">SOCRATES is a model hosted by the UK Meteorological Office and is accessible after registration at <uri>https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/socrates/wiki</uri> (last access: 30 November 2022). Model input (CRISTA-2 and meteorological reanalysis data) and output data by SOCRATES used in this study are available on request from the first author. In addition, all program codes in IDL used for the data analysis are available from the first author.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6738">All authors designed the study. RS analysed and prepared the CRISTA data for the model runs. AR performed the SOCRATES runs and prepared the output files for radiative effect calculations. RS together with AR analysed the model output. All authors contributed to data interpretation and the writing of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6744">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e6753">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6759">The authors would like to thank Dirk Offermann and the former CRISTA team at the University of Wuppertal, Germany, for the realisation of two successful instrument missions and the subsequent data processing. Thanks to the UK Meteorological Office for providing and supporting the SOCRATES radiative transport model. The authors are grateful to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for providing reanalysis data.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6764">The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Forschungszentrum Jülich.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6770">This paper was edited by Jianzhong Ma and reviewed by Blaž Gasparini and Andrew Heymsfield.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Avery et~al.(2012)Avery, Winker, Heymsfield, Vaughan, Young, Hu, and Trepte}}?><label>Avery et al.(2012)Avery, Winker, Heymsfield, Vaughan, Young, Hu, and Trepte</label><?label Avery2012?><mixed-citation>Avery, M., Winker, D., Heymsfield, A., Vaughan, M., Young, S., Hu, Y., and Trepte, C.: Cloud ice water content retrieved from the CALIOP space-based lidar, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L05808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL050545</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Balmes and Fu(2018)}}?><label>Balmes and Fu(2018)</label><?label Balmes2018?><mixed-citation>Balmes, K. A. and Fu, Q.: An Investigation of Optically Very Thin Ice Clouds from Ground-Based ARM Raman Lidars, Atmosphere, 9, 445, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos9110445</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baran(2003)}}?><label>Baran(2003)</label><?label Baran2003?><mixed-citation>Baran, A. J.: Simulation of infrared scattering from ice aggregates by use of a size-shape distribution of circular ice cylinders, Appl. Optics, 42, 2811–2818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.002811" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.42.002811</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baran and Francis(2004)}}?><label>Baran and Francis(2004)</label><?label Baran2004?><mixed-citation>Baran, A. J. and Francis, P. N.: On the radiative properties of cirrus cloud at solar and thermal wavelengths: A test of model consistency using high-resolution airborne radiance measurements, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 763–778, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1256/qj.03.151</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baran et~al.(2001)Baran, Havemann, and Mackowski}}?><label>Baran et al.(2001)Baran, Havemann, and Mackowski</label><?label Baran2001?><mixed-citation> Baran, A. J., Havemann, S., and Mackowski, D.: A database of hexagonal column optical properties for wavelengths ranging between 0.2 microns to 30  microns, produced for ANNEX 7. Contract No. 4b/3/02, DEFRA, UK, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baran et~al.(2014)Baran, Hill, Furtado, Field, and Manners}}?><label>Baran et al.(2014)Baran, Hill, Furtado, Field, and Manners</label><?label Baran2014?><mixed-citation>Baran, A. J., Hill, P., Furtado, K., Field, P., and Manners, J.: A Coupled Cloud Physics–Radiation Parameterization of the Bulk Optical Properties of Cirrus and Its Impact on the Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 5.0 Configuration, J. Climate, 27, 7725–7752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00700.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00700.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baran et~al.(2016)Baran, Hill, Walters, Hardiman, Furtado, Field, and Manners}}?><label>Baran et al.(2016)Baran, Hill, Walters, Hardiman, Furtado, Field, and Manners</label><?label Baran2016?><mixed-citation>Baran, A. J., Hill, P., Walters, D., Hardiman, S. C., Furtado, K., Field, P. R., and Manners, J.: The Impact of Two Coupled Cirrus Microphysics–Radiation Parameterizations on the Temperature and Specific Humidity Biases in the Tropical Tropopause Layer in a Climate Model, J. Climate, 29, 5299–5316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0821.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0821.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bartolome~Garcia et~al.(2021)Bartolome~Garcia, Spang, Ungermann, Griessbach, Kr\"{a}mer, H\"{o}pfner, and Riese}}?><label>Bartolome Garcia et al.(2021)Bartolome Garcia, Spang, Ungermann, Griessbach, Krämer, Höpfner, and Riese</label><?label Bartolome2021?><mixed-citation>Bartolome Garcia, I., Spang, R., Ungermann, J., Griessbach, S., Krämer, M., Höpfner, M., and Riese, M.: Observation of cirrus clouds with GLORIA during the WISE campaign: detection methods and cirrus characterization, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3153–3168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3153-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-3153-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Boucher et~al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold, Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens, and Zhang}}?><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold, Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens, and Zhang</label><?label Boucher2013?><mixed-citation> Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Asse<?pagebreak page1228?>ssment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex,  V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, 571–657, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Davis et~al.(2010)Davis, Hlavka, Jensen, Rosenlof, Yang, Schmidt, Borrmann, Frey, Lawson, Voemel, and Bui}}?><label>Davis et al.(2010)Davis, Hlavka, Jensen, Rosenlof, Yang, Schmidt, Borrmann, Frey, Lawson, Voemel, and Bui</label><?label Davis2010?><mixed-citation>Davis, S., Hlavka, D., Jensen, E., Rosenlof, K., Yang, Q., Schmidt, S., Borrmann, S., Frey, W., Lawson, P., Voemel, H., and Bui, T. P.: In situ and lidar observations of tropopause subvisible cirrus clouds during TC4, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D00J17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013093</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Delano\"{e} and Hogan(2008)}}?><label>Delanoë and Hogan(2008)</label><?label Delanoe2008?><mixed-citation>Delanoë, J. and Hogan, R. J.: A variational scheme for retrieving ice cloud properties from combined radar, lidar, and infrared radiometer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D07204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009000</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Deng et~al.(2010)Deng, Mace, Wang, and Okamoto}}?><label>Deng et al.(2010)Deng, Mace, Wang, and Okamoto</label><?label Deng2010?><mixed-citation>Deng, M., Mace, G. G., Wang, Z., and Okamoto, H.: Tropical Composition, Cloud and Climate Coupling Experiment validation for cirrus cloud profiling retrieval using CloudSat radar and CALIPSO lidar, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D00J15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013104</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Edwards and Slingo(1996)}}?><label>Edwards and Slingo(1996)</label><?label Edwards1996?><mixed-citation>Edwards, J. M. and Slingo, A.: Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 689–719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712253107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49712253107</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fischer et~al.(2008)Fischer, Birk, Blom, Carli, Carlotti, von Clarmann, Delbouille, Dudhia, Ehhalt, Endemann, Flaud, Gessner, Kleinert, Koopmann, Langen, {L\'{o}pez-Puertas}, Mosner, Nett, Oelhaf, Perron, Remedios, Ridolfi, Stiller, and Zander}}?><label>Fischer et al.(2008)Fischer, Birk, Blom, Carli, Carlotti, von Clarmann, Delbouille, Dudhia, Ehhalt, Endemann, Flaud, Gessner, Kleinert, Koopmann, Langen, López-Puertas, Mosner, Nett, Oelhaf, Perron, Remedios, Ridolfi, Stiller, and Zander</label><?label Fischer2008?><mixed-citation>Fischer, H., Birk, M., Blom, C., Carli, B., Carlotti, M., von Clarmann, T., Delbouille, L., Dudhia, A., Ehhalt, D., Endemann, M., Flaud, J. M., Gessner, R., Kleinert, A., Koopman, R., Langen, J., López-Puertas, M., Mosner, P., Nett, H., Oelhaf, H., Perron, G., Remedios, J., Ridolfi, M., Stiller, G., and Zander, R.: MIPAS: an instrument for atmospheric and climate research, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2151–2188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2151-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2151-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Forster et~al.(2021)Forster, Storelvmo, Armour, Collins, Dufresne, Frame, Lunt, Mauritsen, Palmer, Watanabe, Wild, and Zhang}}?><label>Forster et al.(2021)Forster, Storelvmo, Armour, Collins, Dufresne, Frame, Lunt, Mauritsen, Palmer, Watanabe, Wild, and Zhang</label><?label Forster2021?><mixed-citation>Forster, P., Storelvmo, T., Armour, K., Collins, W., Dufresne, J.-L., Frame, D., Lunt, D., Mauritsen, T., Palmer, M., Watanabe, M., Wild, M., and Zhang, H.: The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.009</ext-link>, p. 923–1054, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gasparini et~al.(2018)Gasparini, Meyer, Neubauer, M\"{u}nch, and Lohmann}}?><label>Gasparini et al.(2018)Gasparini, Meyer, Neubauer, Münch, and Lohmann</label><?label Gasparini2018?><mixed-citation>Gasparini, B., Meyer, A., Neubauer, D., Münch, S., and Lohmann, U.: Cirrus Cloud Properties as Seen by the CALIPSO Satellite and ECHAM-HAM Global Climate Model, J. Climate, 31, 1983–2003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0608.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0608.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gasparini et~al.(2022)Gasparini, Sokol, Wall, Hartmann, and Blossey}}?><label>Gasparini et al.(2022)Gasparini, Sokol, Wall, Hartmann, and Blossey</label><?label Gasparini2022?><mixed-citation>Gasparini, B., Sokol, A. B., Wall, C. J., Hartmann, D. L., and Blossey, P. N.: Diurnal Differences in Tropical Maritime Anvil Cloud Evolution, J. Climate, 35, 1655–1677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0211.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0211.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gasparini et~al.(2023)Gasparini, Sullivan, Sokol, K\"{a}rcher, Jensen, and Hartmann}}?><label>Gasparini et al.(2023)Gasparini, Sullivan, Sokol, Kärcher, Jensen, and Hartmann</label><?label Gasparini2023?><mixed-citation>Gasparini, B., Sullivan, S. C., Sokol, A. B., Kärcher, B., Jensen, E., and Hartmann, D. L.: Opinion: Tropical cirrus – From micro-scale processes to climate-scale impacts, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2023-1214</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gettelman and Sherwood(2016)}}?><label>Gettelman and Sherwood(2016)</label><?label Gettleman2016?><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A. and Sherwood, S.: Processes Responsible for Cloud Feedback, Current Climate Change Reports, 2, 179–189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0052-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40641-016-0052-8</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Grossmann et~al.(2002)Grossmann, Offermann, Gusev, Oberheide, Riese, and Spang}}?><label>Grossmann et al.(2002)Grossmann, Offermann, Gusev, Oberheide, Riese, and Spang</label><?label Grossmann2001?><mixed-citation>Grossmann, K. U., Offermann, D., Gusev, O., Oberheide, J., Riese, M., and Spang, R.: The CRISTA-2 Mission, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8173,, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000667" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000667</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hersbach et~al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara, Hor\'{a}nyi, Mu\~{n}oz-Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Abdalla, Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita, De~Chiara, Dahlgren, Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hogan, H\'{o}lm, Janiskov\'{a}, Keeley, Laloyaux, Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti, de~Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and Th\'{e}paut}}?><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara, Horányi, Muñoz-Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Abdalla, Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita, De Chiara, Dahlgren, Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hogan, Hólm, Janisková, Keeley, Laloyaux, Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti, de Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and Thépaut</label><?label hersbach2020?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heymsfield and Platt(1984)}}?><label>Heymsfield and Platt(1984)</label><?label Heymsfield1984?><mixed-citation>Heymsfield, A. J. and Platt, C. M. R.: A Parameterization of the Particle Size Spectrum of Ice Clouds in Terms of the Ambient Temperature and the Ice Water Content, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 846–855, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0846:APOTPS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0846:APOTPS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heymsfield et~al.(2017)Heymsfield, Kr\"{a}mer, Luebke, Brown, Cziczo, Franklin, Lawson, Lohmann, McFarquhar, Ulanowski, and Tricht}}?><label>Heymsfield et al.(2017)Heymsfield, Krämer, Luebke, Brown, Cziczo, Franklin, Lawson, Lohmann, McFarquhar, Ulanowski, and Tricht</label><?label Heymsfield2017?><mixed-citation>Heymsfield, A. J., Krämer, M., Luebke, A., Brown, P., Cziczo, D. J., Franklin, C., Lawson, P., Lohmann, U., McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and Tricht, K. V.: Cirrus Clouds, Meteor. Mon., 58, 2.1 – 2.26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0010.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0010.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoffmann and Spang(2022)}}?><label>Hoffmann and Spang(2022)</label><?label Hoffmann2022?><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, L. and Spang, R.: An assessment of tropopause characteristics of the ERA5 and ERA-Interim meteorological reanalyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4019–4046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4019-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-4019-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hong and Liu(2015)}}?><label>Hong and Liu(2015)</label><?label Hong2015?><mixed-citation>Hong, Y. and Liu, G.: The Characteristics of Ice Cloud Properties Derived from CloudSat and CALIPSO Measurements, J. Climate, 28, 3880–3901, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00666.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00666.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hong et~al.(2016)Hong, Liu, and Li}}?><label>Hong et al.(2016)Hong, Liu, and Li</label><?label Hong2016?><mixed-citation>Hong, Y., Liu, G., and Li, J.-L. F.: Assessing the Radiative Effects of Global Ice Clouds Based on CloudSat and CALIPSO Measurements, J. Climate, 29, 7651–7674, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0799.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0799.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kato et~al.(2019)Kato, Rose, Ham, Rutan, Radkevich, Caldwell, Sun-Mack, Miller, and Chen}}?><label>Kato et al.(2019)Kato, Rose, Ham, Rutan, Radkevich, Caldwell, Sun-Mack, Miller, and Chen</label><?label Kato2019?><mixed-citation>Kato, S., Rose, F. G., Ham, S. H., Rutan, D. A., Radkevich, A., Caldwell, T. E., Sun-Mack, S., Miller, W. F., and Chen, Y.: Radiative Heating Rates Computed With Clouds Derived From Satellite-Based Passive and Active Sensors and their Effects on Generation of Available Potential Energy, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1720–1740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028878" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD028878</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kr\"{a}mer et~al.(2016)Kr\"{a}mer, Rolf, Luebke, Afchine, Spelten, Costa, Meyer, Z\"{o}ger, Smith, Herman, Buchholz, Ebert, Baumgardner, Borrmann, Klingebiel, and Avallone}}?><label>Krämer et al.(2016)Krämer, Rolf, Luebke, Afchine, Spelten, Costa, Meyer, Zöger, Smith, Herman, Buchholz, Ebert, Baumgardner, Borrmann, Klingebiel, and Avallone</label><?label Kraemer2016?><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kr\"{a}mer et~al.(2020)Kr\"{a}mer, Rolf, Spelten, Afchine, Fahey, Jensen, Khaykin, Kuhn, Lawson, Lykov, Pan, Riese, Rollins, Stroh, Thornberry, Wolf, Woods, Spichtinger, Quaas, and Sourdeval}}?><label>Krämer et al.(2020)Krämer, Rolf, Spelten, Afchine, Fahey, Jensen, Khaykin, Kuhn, Lawson, Lykov, Pan, Riese, Rollins, Stroh, Thornberry, Wolf, Woods, Spichtinger, Quaas, and Sourdeval</label><?label Kraemer2020?><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Fahey, D., Jensen, E., Khaykin, S., Kuhn, T., Lawson, P., Lykov, A., Pan, L. L., Riese, M., Rollins, A., Stroh, F., Thornberry, T., Wolf, V., Woods, S., Spichtinger, P., Quaas, J., and Sourdeval, O.: A microphysics guide to cirrus – Part 2: Climatologies of clouds and humidity from observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12569–12608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kunz et~al.(2013)Kunz, M\"{u}ller, Homonnai, J\'{a}nosi, Hurst, Rap, Forster, Rohrer, Spelten, and Riese}}?><label>Kunz et al.(2013)Kunz, Müller, Homonnai, Jánosi, Hurst, Rap, Forster, Rohrer, Spelten, and Riese</label><?label Kunz2013?><mixed-citation>Kunz, A., Müller, R., Homonnai, V., Jánosi, I., Hurst, D., Rap, A., Forster, P., Rohrer, F., Spelten, N., and Riese, M.: Extending water vapor trend observations over Boulder into the tropopause region: trend uncertainties and resulting radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 11269–11284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50831" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50831</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1229?><ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lawson et~al.(2019)Lawson, Woods, Jensen, Erfani, Gurganus, Gallagher, Connolly, Whiteway, Baran, May, Heymsfield, Schmitt, McFarquhar, Um, Protat, Bailey, Lance, Muehlbauer, Stith, Korolev, Toon, and Kr\"{a}mer}}?><label>Lawson et al.(2019)Lawson, Woods, Jensen, Erfani, Gurganus, Gallagher, Connolly, Whiteway, Baran, May, Heymsfield, Schmitt, McFarquhar, Um, Protat, Bailey, Lance, Muehlbauer, Stith, Korolev, Toon, and Krämer</label><?label Lawson2019?><mixed-citation>Lawson, R. P., Woods, S., Jensen, E., Erfani, E., Gurganus, C., Gallagher, M., Connolly, P., Whiteway, J., Baran, A. J., May, P., Heymsfield, A., Schmitt, C. G., McFarquhar, G., Um, J., Protat, A., Bailey, M., Lance, S., Muehlbauer, A., Stith, J., Korolev, A., Toon, O. B., and Krämer, M.: A Review of Ice Particle Shapes in Cirrus formed In Situ and in Anvils, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 10049–10090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD030122</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liou(1986)}}?><label>Liou(1986)</label><?label Liou1986?><mixed-citation>Liou, K.-N.: Influence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A Global Perspective, Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 1167–1199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114&lt;1167:IOCCOW&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114&lt;1167:IOCCOW&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Luo et~al.(2003)Luo, Peter, Fueglistaler, Wernli, Wirth, Kiemle, Flentje, Yushkov, Khattatov, Rudakov, Thomas, Borrmann, Toci, Mazzinghi, Beuermann, Schiller, Cairo, Di~Donfrancesco, Adriani, Volk, Strom, Noone, Mitev, MacKenzie, Carslaw, Trautmann, Santacesaria, and Stefanutti}}?><label>Luo et al.(2003)Luo, Peter, Fueglistaler, Wernli, Wirth, Kiemle, Flentje, Yushkov, Khattatov, Rudakov, Thomas, Borrmann, Toci, Mazzinghi, Beuermann, Schiller, Cairo, Di Donfrancesco, Adriani, Volk, Strom, Noone, Mitev, MacKenzie, Carslaw, Trautmann, Santacesaria, and Stefanutti</label><?label Luo2003b?><mixed-citation>Luo, B. P., Peter, T., Fueglistaler, S., Wernli, H., Wirth, M., Kiemle, C., Flentje, H., Yushkov, V. A., Khattatov, V., Rudakov, V., Thomas, A., Borrmann, S., Toci, G., Mazzinghi, P., Beuermann, J., Schiller, C., Cairo, F., Di Donfrancesco, G., Adriani, A., Volk, C. M., Strom, J., Noone, K., Mitev, V., MacKenzie, R. A., Carslaw, K. S., Trautmann, T., Santacesaria, V., and Stefanutti, L.: Dehydration potential of ultrathin clouds at the tropical tropopause, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016737</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Massie et~al.(2010)Massie, Gille, Craig, Khosravi, Barnett, Read, and Winker}}?><label>Massie et al.(2010)Massie, Gille, Craig, Khosravi, Barnett, Read, and Winker</label><?label Massie2010?><mixed-citation>Massie, S. T., Gille, J., Craig, C., Khosravi, R., Barnett, J., Read, W., and Winker, D.: HIRDLS and CALIPSO observations of tropical cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D00H11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012100</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Matus and L'Ecuyer(2017)}}?><label>Matus and L'Ecuyer(2017)</label><?label Matus2017?><mixed-citation>Matus, A. V. and L'Ecuyer, T. S.: The role of cloud phase in Earth's radiation budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 2559–2578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025951" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025951</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{McFarquhar and Heymsfield(1997)}}?><label>McFarquhar and Heymsfield(1997)</label><?label McFarquhar1997?><mixed-citation>McFarquhar, G. M. and Heymsfield, A. J.: Parameterization of Tropical Cirrus Ice Crystal Size Distributions and Implications for Radiative Transfer: Results from CEPEX, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2187–2200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2187:POTCIC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2187:POTCIC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{McFarquhar et~al.(2002)McFarquhar, Yang, Macke, and Baran}}?><label>McFarquhar et al.(2002)McFarquhar, Yang, Macke, and Baran</label><?label McFarquhar2002?><mixed-citation>McFarquhar, G. M., Yang, P., Macke, A., and Baran, A. J.: A New Parameterization of Single Scattering Solar Radiative Properties for Tropical Anvils Using Observed Ice Crystal Size and Shape Distributions, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 2458–2478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;2458:ANPOSS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;2458:ANPOSS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Myhre et~al.(2009{\natexlab{a}})Myhre, Berglen, Johnsrud, Hoyle, Berntsen, Christopher, Fahey, Isaksen, Jones, Kahn, Loeb, Quinn, Remer, Schwarz, and Yttri}}?><label>Myhre et al.(2009a)Myhre, Berglen, Johnsrud, Hoyle, Berntsen, Christopher, Fahey, Isaksen, Jones, Kahn, Loeb, Quinn, Remer, Schwarz, and Yttri</label><?label Myhre2009b?><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Berglen, T. F., Johnsrud, M., Hoyle, C. R., Berntsen, T. K., Christopher, S. A., Fahey, D. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Jones, T. A., Kahn, R. A., Loeb, N., Quinn, P., Remer, L., Schwarz, J. P., and Yttri, K. E.: Modelled radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect with multi-observation evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1365–1392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1365-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1365-2009</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Myhre et~al.(2009{\natexlab{b}})Myhre, Kvalevg, R{\"{a}}del, Cook, Shine, Clark, Karcher, Markowicz, Kardas, Wolkenberg, Balkanski, Ponater, Forster, Rap, and Leon}}?><label>Myhre et al.(2009b)Myhre, Kvalevg, Rädel, Cook, Shine, Clark, Karcher, Markowicz, Kardas, Wolkenberg, Balkanski, Ponater, Forster, Rap, and Leon</label><?label Myhre2009?><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Kvalevg, M., Rädel, G., Cook, J., Shine, K. P., Clark, H., Karcher, F., Markowicz, K., Kardas, A., Wolkenberg, P., Balkanski, Y., Ponater, M., Forster, P., Rap, A., and Leon, R. R.: Intercomparison of radiative forcing calculations of stratospheric water vapour and contrails, Meteorol. Z., 18, 585–596, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0411" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0411</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nugent et~al.(2022)Nugent, Turbeville, Bretherton, Blossey, and Ackerman}}?><label>Nugent et al.(2022)Nugent, Turbeville, Bretherton, Blossey, and Ackerman</label><?label Nugent2022?><mixed-citation>Nugent, J. M., Turbeville, S. M., Bretherton, C. S., Blossey, P. N., and Ackerman, T. P.: Tropical Cirrus in Global Storm-Resolving Models: 1. Role of Deep Convection, Earth Space Sci., 9, e2021EA001965, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001965" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021EA001965</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Offermann et~al.(1999)Offermann, Grossmann, Barthol, Knieling, Riese, and Trant}}?><label>Offermann et al.(1999)Offermann, Grossmann, Barthol, Knieling, Riese, and Trant</label><?label Offermann1999?><mixed-citation> Offermann, D., Grossmann, K.-U., Barthol, P., Knieling, P., Riese, M., and Trant, R.: Cryogenic Infrared Spectrometers and Telescopes for the Atmosphere (CRISTA) experiment and middle atmosphere variability, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16311–16325, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Peter et~al.(2003)Peter, Luo, Wirth, Kiemle, Flentje, Yushkov, Khattatov, Rudakov, Thomas, Borrmann, Toci, Mazzinghi, Beuermann, Schiller, Cairo, Di~Donfrancesco, Adriani, Volk, Strom, Noone, Mitev, MacKenzie, Carslaw, Trautmann, Santacesaria, and Stefanutti}}?><label>Peter et al.(2003)Peter, Luo, Wirth, Kiemle, Flentje, Yushkov, Khattatov, Rudakov, Thomas, Borrmann, Toci, Mazzinghi, Beuermann, Schiller, Cairo, Di Donfrancesco, Adriani, Volk, Strom, Noone, Mitev, MacKenzie, Carslaw, Trautmann, Santacesaria, and Stefanutti</label><?label Peter2003?><mixed-citation>Peter, Th., Luo, B. P., Wirth, M., Kiemle, C., Flentje, H., Yushkov, V. A., Khattatov, V., Rudakov, V., Thomas, A., Borrmann, S., Toci, G., Mazzinghi, P., Beuermann, J., Schiller, C., Cairo, F., Di Donfrancesco, G., Adriani, A., Volk, C. M., Strom, J., Noone, K., Mitev, V., MacKenzie, R. A., Carslaw, K. S., Trautmann, T., Santacesaria, V., and Stefanutti, L.: Ultrathin Tropical Tropopause Clouds (UTTCs): I. Cloud morphology and occurrence, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1083–1091, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1083-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-1083-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rap et~al.(2010)Rap, Forster, Jones, Boucher, Haywood, Bellouin, and De~Leon}}?><label>Rap et al.(2010)Rap, Forster, Jones, Boucher, Haywood, Bellouin, and De Leon</label><?label Rap2010?><mixed-citation>Rap, A., Forster, P. M., Jones, A., Boucher, O., Haywood, J. M., Bellouin, N., and De Leon, R. R.: Parameterization of contrails in the UK Met Office Climate Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D10205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012443</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rap et~al.(2013)Rap, Scott, Spracklen, Bellouin, Forster, Carslaw, Schmidt, and Mann}}?><label>Rap et al.(2013)Rap, Scott, Spracklen, Bellouin, Forster, Carslaw, Schmidt, and Mann</label><?label Rap2013?><mixed-citation>Rap, A., Scott, C. E., Spracklen, D. V., Bellouin, N., Forster, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Schmidt, A., and Mann, G.: Natural aerosol direct and indirect radiative effects, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3297–3301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50441" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50441</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rap et~al.(2015{\natexlab{a}})Rap, Richards, Forster, Monks, Arnold, and Chipperfield}}?><label>Rap et al.(2015a)Rap, Richards, Forster, Monks, Arnold, and Chipperfield</label><?label Rap2015b?><mixed-citation>Rap, A., Richards, N. A. D., Forster, P. M., Monks, S. A., Arnold, S. R., and Chipperfield, M. P.: Satellite constraint on the tropospheric ozone radiative effect, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 5074–5081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL064037</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rap et~al.(2015{\natexlab{b}})Rap, Spracklen, Mercado, Reddington, Haywood, Ellis, Phillips, Artaxo, Bonal, Restrepo~Coupe, and Butt}}?><label>Rap et al.(2015b)Rap, Spracklen, Mercado, Reddington, Haywood, Ellis, Phillips, Artaxo, Bonal, Restrepo Coupe, and Butt</label><?label Rap2015a?><mixed-citation>Rap, A., Spracklen, D. V., Mercado, L., Reddington, C. L., Haywood, J. M., Ellis, R. J., Phillips, O. L., Artaxo, P., Bonal, D., Restrepo Coupe, N., and Butt, N.: Fires increase Amazon forest productivity through increases in diffuse radiation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4654–4662, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063719</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rap et~al.(2018)Rap, Scott, Reddington, Mercado, Ellis, Garraway, Evans, Beerling, MacKenzie, Hewitt, and Spracklen}}?><label>Rap et al.(2018)Rap, Scott, Reddington, Mercado, Ellis, Garraway, Evans, Beerling, MacKenzie, Hewitt, and Spracklen</label><?label Rap2018?><mixed-citation>Rap, A., Scott, C., Reddington, C., Mercado, L., Ellis, R., Garraway, S., Evans, M., Beerling, D., MacKenzie, A., Hewitt, C., and Spracklen, D.: Enhanced global primary production by biogenic aerosol via diffuse radiation fertilization, Nat. Geosci., 11, 640–644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0208-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0208-3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riese et~al.(2012)Riese, Ploeger, Rap, Vogel, Konopka, Dameris, and Forster}}?><label>Riese et al.(2012)Riese, Ploeger, Rap, Vogel, Konopka, Dameris, and Forster</label><?label Riese2012?><mixed-citation>Riese, M., Ploeger, F., Rap, A., Vogel, B., Konopka, P., Dameris, M., and Forster, P.: Impact of uncertainties in atmospheric mixing on simulated UTLS composition and related radiative effects, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017751</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riese et~al.(2014)Riese, Oelhaf, Preusse, Blank, Ern, Friedl-Vallon, Fischer, Guggenmoser, H\"{o}pfner, Hoor, Kaufmann, Orphal, Pl\"{o}ger, Spang, Sumi\'{n}ska-Ebersoldt, Ungermann, Vogel, and Woiwode}}?><label>Riese et al.(2014)Riese, Oelhaf, Preusse, Blank, Ern, Friedl-Vallon, Fischer, Guggenmoser, Höpfner, Hoor, Kaufmann, Orphal, Plöger, Spang, Sumińska-Ebersoldt, Ungermann, Vogel, and Woiwode</label><?label Riese2014?><mixed-citation>Riese, M., Oelhaf, H., Preusse, P., Blank, J., Ern, M., Friedl-Vallon, F., Fischer, H., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Hoor, P., Kaufmann, M., Orphal, J., Plöger, F., Spang, R., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Ungermann, J., Vogel, B., and Woiwode, W.: Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere (GLORIA) scientific objectives, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1915–1928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1915-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-1915-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rodr\'{\i}guez De Le\'{o}n et~al.(2018)Rodr\'{\i}guez De Le\'{o}n, Lim, Lee, Bennett, and Kr\"{a}mer}}?><label>Rodríguez De León et al.(2018)Rodríguez De León, Lim, Lee, Bennett, and Krämer</label><?label Rodriguez2018?><mixed-citation>Rodríguez De León, R., Lim, L. L., Lee, D. S., Bennett, M., and Krämer, M.: Simple Versus Complex Physical Representation of the Radiative Forcing From Linear Contrails: A Sensitivity Analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2831–2840, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027861" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD027861</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rother et~al.(2006)Rother, Schmidt, Wauer, Shcherbakov, and Gayet}}?><label>Rother et al.(2006)Rother, Schmidt, Wauer, Shcherbakov, and Gayet</label><?label Rother2006?><mixed-citation>Rother, T., Schmidt, K., Wauer, J., Shcherbakov, V., and Gayet, J.-F.: Light scattering on Chebyshev particles of higher order, Appl. Optics, 45, 6030–6037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.45.006030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.45.006030</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sassen and Cho(1992)}}?><label>Sassen and Cho(1992)</label><?label Sassen1992?><mixed-citation>Sassen, K. and Cho, B. S.: Subvisual-thin cirrus lidar data set for satellite verification and climatological research, J. Appl. Meteorol., 31, 1275–1285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031&lt;1275:STCLDF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031&lt;1275:STCLDF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1230?><ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sherwood et~al.(2020)Sherwood, Webb, Annan, Armour, Forster, Hargreaves, Hegerl, Klein, Marvel, Rohling, Watanabe, Andrews, Braconnot, Bretherton, Foster, Hausfather, von~der Heydt, Knutti, Mauritsen, Norris, Proistosescu, Rugenstein, Schmidt, Tokarska, and Zelinka}}?><label>Sherwood et al.(2020)Sherwood, Webb, Annan, Armour, Forster, Hargreaves, Hegerl, Klein, Marvel, Rohling, Watanabe, Andrews, Braconnot, Bretherton, Foster, Hausfather, von der Heydt, Knutti, Mauritsen, Norris, Proistosescu, Rugenstein, Schmidt, Tokarska, and Zelinka</label><?label Sherwood2020?><mixed-citation>Sherwood, S. C., Webb, M. J., Annan, J. D., Armour, K. C., Forster, P. M., Hargreaves, J. C., Hegerl, G., Klein, S. A., Marvel, K. D., Rohling, E. J., Watanabe, M., Andrews, T., Braconnot, P., Bretherton, C. S., Foster, G. L., Hausfather, Z., von der Heydt, A. S., Knutti, R., Mauritsen, T., Norris, J. R., Proistosescu, C., Rugenstein, M., Schmidt, G. A., Tokarska, K. B., and Zelinka, M. D.: An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000678" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019RG000678</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Spang et~al.(2002)Spang, Eidmann, Riese, Offermann, Preusse, Pfister, and Wang}}?><label>Spang et al.(2002)Spang, Eidmann, Riese, Offermann, Preusse, Pfister, and Wang</label><?label Spang2002?><mixed-citation>Spang, R., Eidmann, G., Riese, M., Offermann, D., Preusse, P., Pfister, L., and Wang, P.-H.: CRISTA observations of cirrus clouds around the tropopause, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, CRI 2-1–CRI 2-18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000698" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000698</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Spang et~al.(2004)Spang, Remedios, and Barkley}}?><label>Spang et al.(2004)Spang, Remedios, and Barkley</label><?label Spang2004?><mixed-citation>Spang, R., Remedios, J., and Barkley, M.: Colour indices for the detection and differentiation of cloud types in infra-red limb emission spectra, Adv. Space Res., 33, 1041–1047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00585-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00585-4</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Spang et~al.(2008)Spang, Hoffmann, Kullmann, Olschewski, Preusse, Knieling, Schroeder, Stroh, Weigel, and Riese}}?><label>Spang et al.(2008)Spang, Hoffmann, Kullmann, Olschewski, Preusse, Knieling, Schroeder, Stroh, Weigel, and Riese</label><?label Spang2008?><mixed-citation>Spang, R., Hoffmann, L., Kullmann, A., Olschewski, F., Preusse, P., Knieling, P., Schroeder, S., Stroh, F., Weigel, K., and Riese, M.: High resolution limb observations of clouds by the CRISTA-NF experiment during the SCOUT-O3 tropical aircraft campaign, Adv. Space Res., 42, 1765–1775, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.09.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2007.09.036</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Spang et~al.(2012)Spang, Arndt, Dudhia, H\"{o}pfner, Hoffmann, Hurley, Grainger, Griessbach, Poulsen, Remedios, Riese, Sembhi, Siddans, Waterfall, and Zehner}}?><label>Spang et al.(2012)Spang, Arndt, Dudhia, Höpfner, Hoffmann, Hurley, Grainger, Griessbach, Poulsen, Remedios, Riese, Sembhi, Siddans, Waterfall, and Zehner</label><?label Spang2012?><mixed-citation>Spang, R., Arndt, K., Dudhia, A., Höpfner, M., Hoffmann, L., Hurley, J., Grainger, R. G., Griessbach, S., Poulsen, C., Remedios, J. J., Riese, M., Sembhi, H., Siddans, R., Waterfall, A., and Zehner, C.: Fast cloud parameter retrievals of MIPAS/Envisat, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7135–7164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7135-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7135-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Spang et~al.(2015)Spang, G\"{u}nther, Riese, Hoffmann, M\"{u}ller, and Griessbach}}?><label>Spang et al.(2015)Spang, Günther, Riese, Hoffmann, Müller, and Griessbach</label><?label Spang2015?><mixed-citation>Spang, R., Günther, G., Riese, M., Hoffmann, L., Müller, R., and Griessbach, S.: Satellite observations of cirrus clouds in the Northern Hemisphere lowermost stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 927–950, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-927-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-927-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Turbeville et~al.(2022)Turbeville, Nugent, Ackerman, Bretherton, and Blossey}}?><label>Turbeville et al.(2022)Turbeville, Nugent, Ackerman, Bretherton, and Blossey</label><?label Turbeville2022?><mixed-citation>Turbeville, S. M., Nugent, J. M., Ackerman, T. P., Bretherton, C. S., and Blossey, P. N.: Tropical Cirrus in Global Storm-Resolving Models: 2. Cirrus Life Cycle and Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Fluxes, Earth Space Sci., 9, e2021EA001978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021EA001978</ext-link>, e2021EA001978 2021EA001978, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ungermann et~al.(2020)Ungermann, Bartolome, Griessbach, Spang, Rolf, Kr\"{a}mer, H\"{o}pfner, and Riese}}?><label>Ungermann et al.(2020)Ungermann, Bartolome, Griessbach, Spang, Rolf, Krämer, Höpfner, and Riese</label><?label Ungermann2020?><mixed-citation>Ungermann, J., Bartolome, I., Griessbach, S., Spang, R., Rolf, C., Krämer, M., Höpfner, M., and Riese, M.: Cirrus cloud shape detection by tomographic extinction retrievals from infrared limb emission sounder measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 7025–7045, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-7025-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-7025-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vial et~al.(2013)Vial, Dufresne, and Bony}}?><label>Vial et al.(2013)Vial, Dufresne, and Bony</label><?label Vial2013?><mixed-citation>Vial, J., Dufresne, J.-L., and Bony, S.: On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates, Clim. Dynam., 41, 3339–3362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1725-9" ext-link-type="DOI">doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1725-9</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Voigt et~al.(2021)Voigt, Albern, Ceppi, Grise, Li, and Medeiros}}?><label>Voigt et al.(2021)Voigt, Albern, Ceppi, Grise, Li, and Medeiros</label><?label Voigt2021?><mixed-citation>Voigt, A., Albern, N., Ceppi, P., Grise, K., Li, Y., and Medeiros, B.: Clouds, radiation, and atmospheric circulation in the present-day climate and under climate change, WIREs Clim. Change, 12, e694, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.694" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wcc.694</ext-link>, 2021. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Woods et~al.(2018)Woods, Lawson, Jensen, Bui, Thornberry, Rollins, Pfister, and Avery}}?><label>Woods et al.(2018)Woods, Lawson, Jensen, Bui, Thornberry, Rollins, Pfister, and Avery</label><?label Woods2018?><mixed-citation>Woods, S., Lawson, R. P., Jensen, E., Bui, T. P., Thornberry, T., Rollins, A., Pfister, L., and Avery, M.: Microphysical Properties of Tropical Tropopause Layer Cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6053–6069, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JD028068</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wu et~al.(2008)Wu, Jiang, Read, Austin, Davis, Lambert, Stephens, Vane, and Waters}}?><label>Wu et al.(2008)Wu, Jiang, Read, Austin, Davis, Lambert, Stephens, Vane, and Waters</label><?label Wu2008?><mixed-citation>Wu, D. L., Jiang, J. H., Read, W. G., Austin, R. T., Davis, C. P., Lambert, A., Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., and Waters, J. W.: Validation of the Aura MLS cloud ice water content measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D00A24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008931" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008931</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yang et~al.(2000)Yang, Liou, Wyser, and Mitchell}}?><label>Yang et al.(2000)Yang, Liou, Wyser, and Mitchell</label><?label PYang2000?><mixed-citation>Yang, P., Liou, K. N., Wyser, K., and Mitchell, D.: Parameterization of the scattering and absorption properties of individual ice crystals, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 4699–4718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900755" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900755</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yang et~al.(2003)Yang, Baum, Heymsfield, Hu, Huang, Tsay, and Ackerman}}?><label>Yang et al.(2003)Yang, Baum, Heymsfield, Hu, Huang, Tsay, and Ackerman</label><?label PYang2003?><mixed-citation>Yang, P., Baum, B. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Hu, Y. X., Huang, H.-L., Tsay, S.-C., and Ackerman, S.: Single-scattering properties of droxtals, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 79–80, 1159–1169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(02)00347-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-4073(02)00347-3</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yang et~al.(2005)Yang, Wei, Huang, Baum, Hu, Kattawar, Mishchenko, and Fu}}?><label>Yang et al.(2005)Yang, Wei, Huang, Baum, Hu, Kattawar, Mishchenko, and Fu</label><?label PYang2005?><mixed-citation>Yang, P., Wei, H., Huang, H.-L., Baum, B. A., Hu, Y. X., Kattawar, G. W., Mishchenko, M. I., and Fu, Q.: Scattering and absorption property database for nonspherical ice particles in the near- through far-infrared spectral region, Appl. Optics, 44, 5512–5523, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.005512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.44.005512</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yi et~al.(2013)Yi, Yang, Baum, L'Ecuyer, Oreopoulos, Mlawer, Heymsfield, and Liou}}?><label>Yi et al.(2013)Yi, Yang, Baum, L'Ecuyer, Oreopoulos, Mlawer, Heymsfield, and Liou</label><?label Yi2013?><mixed-citation>Yi, B., Yang, P., Baum, B. A., L'Ecuyer, T., Oreopoulos, L., Mlawer, E. J., Heymsfield, A. J., and Liou, K.-N.: Influence of Ice Particle Surface Roughening on the Global Cloud Radiative Effect, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2794–2807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-020.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-13-020.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhang et~al.(2004)Zhang, Yang, Kattawar, Tsay, Baum, Hu, Heymsfield, and Reichardt}}?><label>Zhang et al.(2004)Zhang, Yang, Kattawar, Tsay, Baum, Hu, Heymsfield, and Reichardt</label><?label Zhang2004?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z., Yang, P., Kattawar, G. W., Tsay, S.-C., Baum, B. A., Hu, Y., Heymsfield, A. J., and Reichardt, J.: Geometrical-optics solution to light scattering by droxtal ice crystals, Appl. Optics, 43, 2490–2499, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.002490" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.43.002490</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zou et~al.(2020)Zou, Griessbach, Hoffmann, Gong, and Wang}}?><label>Zou et al.(2020)Zou, Griessbach, Hoffmann, Gong, and Wang</label><?label Zou2020?><mixed-citation>Zou, L., Griessbach, S., Hoffmann, L., Gong, B., and Wang, L.: Revisiting global satellite observations of stratospheric cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9939–9959, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9939-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-9939-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zou et~al.(2021)Zou, Hoffmann, Griessbach, Spang, and Wang}}?><label>Zou et al.(2021)Zou, Hoffmann, Griessbach, Spang, and Wang</label><?label Zou2021?><mixed-citation>Zou, L., Hoffmann, L., Griessbach, S., Spang, R., and Wang, L.: Empirical evidence for deep convection being a major source of stratospheric ice clouds over North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10457–10475, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10457-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-10457-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zou et~al.(2022)Zou, Griessbach, Hoffmann, and Spang}}?><label>Zou et al.(2022)Zou, Griessbach, Hoffmann, and Spang</label><?label Zou2022?><mixed-citation>Zou, L., Griessbach, S., Hoffmann, L., and Spang, R.: A global view on stratospheric ice clouds: assessment of processes related to their occurrence based on satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6677–6702, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6677-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-6677-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Radiative effect of thin cirrus clouds in the extratropical lowermost stratosphere and tropopause region</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Avery et al.(2012)Avery, Winker, Heymsfield, Vaughan, Young, Hu, and Trepte</label><mixed-citation>
      
Avery, M., Winker, D., Heymsfield, A., Vaughan, M., Young, S., Hu, Y., and Trepte, C.:
Cloud ice water content retrieved from the CALIOP space-based lidar, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L05808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050545</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Balmes and Fu(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Balmes, K. A. and Fu, Q.:
An Investigation of Optically Very Thin Ice Clouds from Ground-Based ARM Raman Lidars, Atmosphere, 9, 445, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110445</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Baran(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baran, A. J.:
Simulation of infrared scattering from ice aggregates by use of a size-shape distribution of circular ice cylinders, Appl. Optics, 42, 2811–2818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.002811" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.002811</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Baran and Francis(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baran, A. J. and Francis, P. N.:
On the radiative properties of cirrus cloud at solar and thermal wavelengths: A test of model consistency using high-resolution airborne radiance measurements, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 763–778, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.151" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.151</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Baran et al.(2001)Baran, Havemann, and Mackowski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baran, A. J., Havemann, S., and Mackowski, D.:
A database of hexagonal column optical properties for wavelengths ranging between 0.2&thinsp;microns to 30&thinsp; microns, produced for ANNEX 7. Contract No. 4b/3/02, DEFRA, UK, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Baran et al.(2014)Baran, Hill, Furtado, Field, and Manners</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baran, A. J., Hill, P., Furtado, K., Field, P., and Manners, J.:
A Coupled Cloud Physics–Radiation Parameterization of the Bulk Optical Properties of Cirrus and Its Impact on the Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 5.0 Configuration, J. Climate, 27, 7725–7752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00700.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00700.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Baran et al.(2016)Baran, Hill, Walters, Hardiman, Furtado, Field, and Manners</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baran, A. J., Hill, P., Walters, D., Hardiman, S. C., Furtado, K., Field, P. R., and Manners, J.:
The Impact of Two Coupled Cirrus Microphysics–Radiation Parameterizations on the Temperature and Specific Humidity Biases in the Tropical Tropopause Layer in a Climate Model, J. Climate, 29, 5299–5316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0821.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0821.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bartolome Garcia et al.(2021)Bartolome Garcia, Spang, Ungermann, Griessbach, Krämer, Höpfner, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bartolome Garcia, I., Spang, R., Ungermann, J., Griessbach, S., Krämer, M., Höpfner, M., and Riese, M.:
Observation of cirrus clouds with GLORIA during the WISE campaign: detection methods and cirrus characterization, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3153–3168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3153-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3153-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold, Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.:
Clouds and aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K.,
Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex,  V., and
Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, 571–657, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016., 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Davis et al.(2010)Davis, Hlavka, Jensen, Rosenlof, Yang, Schmidt, Borrmann, Frey, Lawson, Voemel, and Bui</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davis, S., Hlavka, D., Jensen, E., Rosenlof, K., Yang, Q., Schmidt, S., Borrmann, S., Frey, W., Lawson, P., Voemel, H., and Bui, T. P.:
In situ and lidar observations of tropopause subvisible cirrus clouds during TC4, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D00J17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013093</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Delanoë and Hogan(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Delanoë, J. and Hogan, R. J.:
A variational scheme for retrieving ice cloud properties from combined radar, lidar, and infrared radiometer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D07204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009000" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009000</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Deng et al.(2010)Deng, Mace, Wang, and Okamoto</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deng, M., Mace, G. G., Wang, Z., and Okamoto, H.:
Tropical Composition, Cloud and Climate Coupling Experiment validation for cirrus cloud profiling retrieval using CloudSat radar and CALIPSO lidar, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D00J15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013104</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Edwards and Slingo(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Edwards, J. M. and Slingo, A.:
Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 689–719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712253107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712253107</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Fischer et al.(2008)Fischer, Birk, Blom, Carli, Carlotti, von Clarmann, Delbouille, Dudhia, Ehhalt, Endemann, Flaud, Gessner, Kleinert, Koopmann, Langen, López-Puertas, Mosner, Nett, Oelhaf, Perron, Remedios, Ridolfi, Stiller, and Zander</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fischer, H., Birk, M., Blom, C., Carli, B., Carlotti, M., von Clarmann, T., Delbouille, L., Dudhia, A., Ehhalt, D., Endemann, M., Flaud, J. M., Gessner, R., Kleinert, A., Koopman, R., Langen, J., López-Puertas, M., Mosner, P., Nett, H., Oelhaf, H., Perron, G., Remedios, J., Ridolfi, M., Stiller, G., and Zander, R.:
MIPAS: an instrument for atmospheric and climate research, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2151–2188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2151-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2151-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Forster et al.(2021)Forster, Storelvmo, Armour, Collins, Dufresne, Frame, Lunt, Mauritsen, Palmer, Watanabe, Wild, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Forster, P., Storelvmo, T., Armour, K., Collins, W., Dufresne, J.-L., Frame, D., Lunt, D., Mauritsen, T., Palmer, M., Watanabe, M., Wild, M., and Zhang, H.:
The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.009</a>, p. 923–1054, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Gasparini et al.(2018)Gasparini, Meyer, Neubauer, Münch, and Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasparini, B., Meyer, A., Neubauer, D., Münch, S., and Lohmann, U.:
Cirrus Cloud Properties as Seen by the CALIPSO Satellite and ECHAM-HAM Global Climate Model, J. Climate, 31, 1983–2003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0608.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0608.1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Gasparini et al.(2022)Gasparini, Sokol, Wall, Hartmann, and Blossey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasparini, B., Sokol, A. B., Wall, C. J., Hartmann, D. L., and Blossey, P. N.:
Diurnal Differences in Tropical Maritime Anvil Cloud Evolution, J. Climate, 35, 1655–1677, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0211.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0211.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Gasparini et al.(2023)Gasparini, Sullivan, Sokol, Kärcher, Jensen, and Hartmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasparini, B., Sullivan, S. C., Sokol, A. B., Kärcher, B., Jensen, E., and Hartmann, D. L.:
Opinion: Tropical cirrus – From micro-scale processes to climate-scale impacts, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1214" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1214</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Gettelman and Sherwood(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gettelman, A. and Sherwood, S.:
Processes Responsible for Cloud Feedback, Current Climate Change Reports, 2, 179–189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0052-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0052-8</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Grossmann et al.(2002)Grossmann, Offermann, Gusev, Oberheide, Riese, and Spang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grossmann, K. U., Offermann, D., Gusev, O., Oberheide, J., Riese, M., and Spang, R.:
The CRISTA-2 Mission, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8173,, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000667" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000667</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara, Horányi, Muñoz-Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Abdalla, Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita, De Chiara, Dahlgren, Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hogan, Hólm, Janisková, Keeley, Laloyaux, Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti, de Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.:
The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Heymsfield and Platt(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heymsfield, A. J. and Platt, C. M. R.:
A Parameterization of the Particle Size Spectrum of Ice Clouds in Terms of the Ambient Temperature and the Ice Water Content, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 846–855, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0846:APOTPS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;0846:APOTPS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Heymsfield et al.(2017)Heymsfield, Krämer, Luebke, Brown, Cziczo, Franklin, Lawson, Lohmann, McFarquhar, Ulanowski, and Tricht</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heymsfield, A. J., Krämer, M., Luebke, A., Brown, P., Cziczo, D. J., Franklin, C., Lawson, P., Lohmann, U., McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and Tricht, K. V.:
Cirrus Clouds, Meteor. Mon., 58, 2.1 – 2.26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0010.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0010.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Hoffmann and Spang(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoffmann, L. and Spang, R.:
An assessment of tropopause characteristics of the ERA5 and ERA-Interim meteorological reanalyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4019–4046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4019-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4019-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hong and Liu(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hong, Y. and Liu, G.:
The Characteristics of Ice Cloud Properties Derived from CloudSat and CALIPSO Measurements, J. Climate, 28, 3880–3901, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00666.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00666.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hong et al.(2016)Hong, Liu, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hong, Y., Liu, G., and Li, J.-L. F.:
Assessing the Radiative Effects of Global Ice Clouds Based on CloudSat and CALIPSO Measurements, J. Climate, 29, 7651–7674, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0799.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0799.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kato et al.(2019)Kato, Rose, Ham, Rutan, Radkevich, Caldwell, Sun-Mack, Miller, and Chen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kato, S., Rose, F. G., Ham, S. H., Rutan, D. A., Radkevich, A., Caldwell, T. E., Sun-Mack, S., Miller, W. F., and Chen, Y.:
Radiative Heating Rates Computed With Clouds Derived From Satellite-Based Passive and Active Sensors and their Effects on Generation of Available Potential Energy, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1720–1740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028878" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028878</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Krämer et al.(2016)Krämer, Rolf, Luebke, Afchine, Spelten, Costa, Meyer, Zöger, Smith, Herman, Buchholz, Ebert, Baumgardner, Borrmann, Klingebiel, and Avallone</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.:
A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Krämer et al.(2020)Krämer, Rolf, Spelten, Afchine, Fahey, Jensen, Khaykin, Kuhn, Lawson, Lykov, Pan, Riese, Rollins, Stroh, Thornberry, Wolf, Woods, Spichtinger, Quaas, and Sourdeval</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Fahey, D., Jensen, E., Khaykin, S., Kuhn, T., Lawson, P., Lykov, A., Pan, L. L., Riese, M., Rollins, A., Stroh, F., Thornberry, T., Wolf, V., Woods, S., Spichtinger, P., Quaas, J., and Sourdeval, O.:
A microphysics guide to cirrus – Part 2: Climatologies of clouds and humidity from observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12569–12608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Kunz et al.(2013)Kunz, Müller, Homonnai, Jánosi, Hurst, Rap, Forster, Rohrer, Spelten, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kunz, A., Müller, R., Homonnai, V., Jánosi, I., Hurst, D., Rap, A., Forster, P., Rohrer, F., Spelten, N., and Riese, M.:
Extending water vapor trend observations over Boulder into the tropopause region: trend uncertainties and resulting radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 11269–11284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50831" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50831</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Lawson et al.(2019)Lawson, Woods, Jensen, Erfani, Gurganus, Gallagher, Connolly, Whiteway, Baran, May, Heymsfield, Schmitt, McFarquhar, Um, Protat, Bailey, Lance, Muehlbauer, Stith, Korolev, Toon, and Krämer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lawson, R. P., Woods, S., Jensen, E., Erfani, E., Gurganus, C., Gallagher, M., Connolly, P., Whiteway, J., Baran, A. J., May, P., Heymsfield, A., Schmitt, C. G., McFarquhar, G., Um, J., Protat, A., Bailey, M., Lance, S., Muehlbauer, A., Stith, J., Korolev, A., Toon, O. B., and Krämer, M.:
A Review of Ice Particle Shapes in Cirrus formed In Situ and in Anvils, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 10049–10090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030122</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Liou(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liou, K.-N.:
Influence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A Global Perspective, Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 1167–1199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114&lt;1167:IOCCOW&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114&lt;1167:IOCCOW&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Luo et al.(2003)Luo, Peter, Fueglistaler, Wernli, Wirth, Kiemle, Flentje, Yushkov, Khattatov, Rudakov, Thomas, Borrmann, Toci, Mazzinghi, Beuermann, Schiller, Cairo, Di Donfrancesco, Adriani, Volk, Strom, Noone, Mitev, MacKenzie, Carslaw, Trautmann, Santacesaria, and Stefanutti</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luo, B. P., Peter, T., Fueglistaler, S., Wernli, H., Wirth, M., Kiemle, C., Flentje, H., Yushkov, V. A., Khattatov, V., Rudakov, V., Thomas, A., Borrmann, S., Toci, G., Mazzinghi, P., Beuermann, J., Schiller, C., Cairo, F., Di Donfrancesco, G., Adriani, A., Volk, C. M., Strom, J., Noone, K., Mitev, V., MacKenzie, R. A., Carslaw, K. S., Trautmann, T., Santacesaria, V., and Stefanutti, L.:
Dehydration potential of ultrathin clouds at the tropical tropopause, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1557, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016737</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Massie et al.(2010)Massie, Gille, Craig, Khosravi, Barnett, Read, and Winker</label><mixed-citation>
      
Massie, S. T., Gille, J., Craig, C., Khosravi, R., Barnett, J., Read, W., and Winker, D.:
HIRDLS and CALIPSO observations of tropical cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D00H11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012100</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Matus and L'Ecuyer(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matus, A. V. and L'Ecuyer, T. S.:
The role of cloud phase in Earth's radiation budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 2559–2578, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025951" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025951</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>McFarquhar and Heymsfield(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
McFarquhar, G. M. and Heymsfield, A. J.:
Parameterization of Tropical Cirrus Ice Crystal Size Distributions and Implications for Radiative Transfer: Results from CEPEX, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2187–2200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2187:POTCIC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2187:POTCIC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>McFarquhar et al.(2002)McFarquhar, Yang, Macke, and Baran</label><mixed-citation>
      
McFarquhar, G. M., Yang, P., Macke, A., and Baran, A. J.:
A New Parameterization of Single Scattering Solar Radiative Properties for Tropical Anvils Using Observed Ice Crystal Size and Shape Distributions, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 2458–2478, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;2458:ANPOSS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;2458:ANPOSS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Myhre et al.(2009a)Myhre, Berglen, Johnsrud, Hoyle, Berntsen, Christopher, Fahey, Isaksen, Jones, Kahn, Loeb, Quinn, Remer, Schwarz, and Yttri</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myhre, G., Berglen, T. F., Johnsrud, M., Hoyle, C. R., Berntsen, T. K., Christopher, S. A., Fahey, D. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Jones, T. A., Kahn, R. A., Loeb, N., Quinn, P., Remer, L., Schwarz, J. P., and Yttri, K. E.:
Modelled radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect with multi-observation evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1365–1392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1365-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1365-2009</a>, 2009a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Myhre et al.(2009b)Myhre, Kvalevg, Rädel, Cook, Shine, Clark, Karcher, Markowicz, Kardas, Wolkenberg, Balkanski, Ponater, Forster, Rap, and Leon</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myhre, G., Kvalevg, M., Rädel, G., Cook, J., Shine, K. P., Clark, H., Karcher, F., Markowicz, K., Kardas, A., Wolkenberg, P., Balkanski, Y., Ponater, M., Forster, P., Rap, A., and Leon, R. R.:
Intercomparison of radiative forcing calculations of stratospheric water vapour and contrails, Meteorol. Z., 18, 585–596, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0411" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0411</a>, 2009b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Nugent et al.(2022)Nugent, Turbeville, Bretherton, Blossey, and Ackerman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nugent, J. M., Turbeville, S. M., Bretherton, C. S., Blossey, P. N., and Ackerman, T. P.:
Tropical Cirrus in Global Storm-Resolving Models: 1. Role of Deep Convection, Earth Space Sci., 9, e2021EA001965, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001965" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001965</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Offermann et al.(1999)Offermann, Grossmann, Barthol, Knieling, Riese, and Trant</label><mixed-citation>
      
Offermann, D., Grossmann, K.-U., Barthol, P., Knieling, P., Riese, M., and Trant, R.:
Cryogenic Infrared Spectrometers and Telescopes for the Atmosphere (CRISTA) experiment and middle atmosphere variability, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16311–16325, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Peter et al.(2003)Peter, Luo, Wirth, Kiemle, Flentje, Yushkov, Khattatov, Rudakov, Thomas, Borrmann, Toci, Mazzinghi, Beuermann, Schiller, Cairo, Di Donfrancesco, Adriani, Volk, Strom, Noone, Mitev, MacKenzie, Carslaw, Trautmann, Santacesaria, and Stefanutti</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peter, Th., Luo, B. P., Wirth, M., Kiemle, C., Flentje, H., Yushkov, V. A., Khattatov, V., Rudakov, V., Thomas, A., Borrmann, S., Toci, G., Mazzinghi, P., Beuermann, J., Schiller, C., Cairo, F., Di Donfrancesco, G., Adriani, A., Volk, C. M., Strom, J., Noone, K., Mitev, V., MacKenzie, R. A., Carslaw, K. S., Trautmann, T., Santacesaria, V., and Stefanutti, L.:
Ultrathin Tropical Tropopause Clouds (UTTCs): I. Cloud morphology and occurrence, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1083–1091, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1083-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1083-2003</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Rap et al.(2010)Rap, Forster, Jones, Boucher, Haywood, Bellouin, and De Leon</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rap, A., Forster, P. M., Jones, A., Boucher, O., Haywood, J. M., Bellouin, N., and De Leon, R. R.:
Parameterization of contrails in the UK Met Office Climate Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D10205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012443" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012443</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Rap et al.(2013)Rap, Scott, Spracklen, Bellouin, Forster, Carslaw, Schmidt, and Mann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rap, A., Scott, C. E., Spracklen, D. V., Bellouin, N., Forster, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Schmidt, A., and Mann, G.:
Natural aerosol direct and indirect radiative effects, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3297–3301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50441" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50441</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Rap et al.(2015a)Rap, Richards, Forster, Monks, Arnold, and Chipperfield</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rap, A., Richards, N. A. D., Forster, P. M., Monks, S. A., Arnold, S. R., and Chipperfield, M. P.:
Satellite constraint on the tropospheric ozone radiative effect, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 5074–5081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064037</a>, 2015a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Rap et al.(2015b)Rap, Spracklen, Mercado, Reddington, Haywood, Ellis, Phillips, Artaxo, Bonal, Restrepo Coupe, and Butt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rap, A., Spracklen, D. V., Mercado, L., Reddington, C. L., Haywood, J. M., Ellis, R. J., Phillips, O. L., Artaxo, P., Bonal, D., Restrepo Coupe, N., and Butt, N.:
Fires increase Amazon forest productivity through increases in diffuse radiation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4654–4662, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063719" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063719</a>, 2015b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Rap et al.(2018)Rap, Scott, Reddington, Mercado, Ellis, Garraway, Evans, Beerling, MacKenzie, Hewitt, and Spracklen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rap, A., Scott, C., Reddington, C., Mercado, L., Ellis, R., Garraway, S., Evans, M., Beerling, D., MacKenzie, A., Hewitt, C., and Spracklen, D.:
Enhanced global primary production by biogenic aerosol via diffuse radiation fertilization, Nat. Geosci., 11, 640–644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0208-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0208-3</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Riese et al.(2012)Riese, Ploeger, Rap, Vogel, Konopka, Dameris, and Forster</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riese, M., Ploeger, F., Rap, A., Vogel, B., Konopka, P., Dameris, M., and Forster, P.:
Impact of uncertainties in atmospheric mixing on simulated UTLS composition and related radiative effects, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017751</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Riese et al.(2014)Riese, Oelhaf, Preusse, Blank, Ern, Friedl-Vallon, Fischer, Guggenmoser, Höpfner, Hoor, Kaufmann, Orphal, Plöger, Spang, Sumińska-Ebersoldt, Ungermann, Vogel, and Woiwode</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riese, M., Oelhaf, H., Preusse, P., Blank, J., Ern, M., Friedl-Vallon, F., Fischer, H., Guggenmoser, T., Höpfner, M., Hoor, P., Kaufmann, M., Orphal, J., Plöger, F., Spang, R., Suminska-Ebersoldt, O., Ungermann, J., Vogel, B., and Woiwode, W.:
Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere (GLORIA) scientific objectives, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1915–1928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1915-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1915-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Rodríguez De León et al.(2018)Rodríguez De León, Lim, Lee, Bennett, and Krämer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rodríguez De León, R., Lim, L. L., Lee, D. S., Bennett, M., and Krämer, M.:
Simple Versus Complex Physical Representation of the Radiative Forcing From Linear Contrails: A Sensitivity Analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2831–2840, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027861" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027861</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Rother et al.(2006)Rother, Schmidt, Wauer, Shcherbakov, and Gayet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rother, T., Schmidt, K., Wauer, J., Shcherbakov, V., and Gayet, J.-F.:
Light scattering on Chebyshev particles of higher order, Appl. Optics, 45, 6030–6037, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.45.006030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.45.006030</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Sassen and Cho(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sassen, K. and Cho, B. S.:
Subvisual-thin cirrus lidar data set for satellite verification and climatological research, J. Appl. Meteorol., 31, 1275–1285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031&lt;1275:STCLDF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031&lt;1275:STCLDF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Sherwood et al.(2020)Sherwood, Webb, Annan, Armour, Forster, Hargreaves, Hegerl, Klein, Marvel, Rohling, Watanabe, Andrews, Braconnot, Bretherton, Foster, Hausfather, von der Heydt, Knutti, Mauritsen, Norris, Proistosescu, Rugenstein, Schmidt, Tokarska, and Zelinka</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sherwood, S. C., Webb, M. J., Annan, J. D., Armour, K. C., Forster, P. M., Hargreaves, J. C., Hegerl, G., Klein, S. A., Marvel, K. D., Rohling, E. J., Watanabe, M., Andrews, T., Braconnot, P., Bretherton, C. S., Foster, G. L., Hausfather, Z., von der Heydt, A. S., Knutti, R., Mauritsen, T., Norris, J. R., Proistosescu, C., Rugenstein, M., Schmidt, G. A., Tokarska, K. B., and Zelinka, M. D.:
An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000678" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000678</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Spang et al.(2002)Spang, Eidmann, Riese, Offermann, Preusse, Pfister, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spang, R., Eidmann, G., Riese, M., Offermann, D., Preusse, P., Pfister, L., and Wang, P.-H.:
CRISTA observations of cirrus clouds around the tropopause, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, CRI&thinsp;2-1–CRI&thinsp;2-18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000698" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000698</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Spang et al.(2004)Spang, Remedios, and Barkley</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spang, R., Remedios, J., and Barkley, M.:
Colour indices for the detection and differentiation of cloud types in infra-red limb emission spectra, Adv. Space Res., 33, 1041–1047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00585-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00585-4</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Spang et al.(2008)Spang, Hoffmann, Kullmann, Olschewski, Preusse, Knieling, Schroeder, Stroh, Weigel, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spang, R., Hoffmann, L., Kullmann, A., Olschewski, F., Preusse, P., Knieling, P., Schroeder, S., Stroh, F., Weigel, K., and Riese, M.:
High resolution limb observations of clouds by the CRISTA-NF experiment during the SCOUT-O3 tropical aircraft campaign, Adv. Space Res., 42, 1765–1775, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.09.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.09.036</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Spang et al.(2012)Spang, Arndt, Dudhia, Höpfner, Hoffmann, Hurley, Grainger, Griessbach, Poulsen, Remedios, Riese, Sembhi, Siddans, Waterfall, and Zehner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spang, R., Arndt, K., Dudhia, A., Höpfner, M., Hoffmann, L., Hurley, J., Grainger, R. G., Griessbach, S., Poulsen, C., Remedios, J. J., Riese, M., Sembhi, H., Siddans, R., Waterfall, A., and Zehner, C.:
Fast cloud parameter retrievals of MIPAS/Envisat, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7135–7164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7135-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7135-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Spang et al.(2015)Spang, Günther, Riese, Hoffmann, Müller, and Griessbach</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spang, R., Günther, G., Riese, M., Hoffmann, L., Müller, R., and Griessbach, S.:
Satellite observations of cirrus clouds in the Northern Hemisphere lowermost stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 927–950, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-927-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-927-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Turbeville et al.(2022)Turbeville, Nugent, Ackerman, Bretherton, and Blossey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Turbeville, S. M., Nugent, J. M., Ackerman, T. P., Bretherton, C. S., and Blossey, P. N.:
Tropical Cirrus in Global Storm-Resolving Models: 2. Cirrus Life Cycle and Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Fluxes, Earth Space Sci., 9, e2021EA001978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001978</a>, e2021EA001978 2021EA001978, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Ungermann et al.(2020)Ungermann, Bartolome, Griessbach, Spang, Rolf, Krämer, Höpfner, and Riese</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ungermann, J., Bartolome, I., Griessbach, S., Spang, R., Rolf, C., Krämer, M., Höpfner, M., and Riese, M.:
Cirrus cloud shape detection by tomographic extinction retrievals from infrared limb emission sounder measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 7025–7045, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-7025-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-7025-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Vial et al.(2013)Vial, Dufresne, and Bony</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vial, J., Dufresne, J.-L., and Bony, S.:
On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates, Clim. Dynam., 41, 3339–3362, <a href="https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1725-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1725-9</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Voigt et al.(2021)Voigt, Albern, Ceppi, Grise, Li, and Medeiros</label><mixed-citation>
      
Voigt, A., Albern, N., Ceppi, P., Grise, K., Li, Y., and Medeiros, B.:
Clouds, radiation, and atmospheric circulation in the present-day climate and under climate change, WIREs Clim. Change, 12, e694, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.694" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.694</a>, 2021.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Woods et al.(2018)Woods, Lawson, Jensen, Bui, Thornberry, Rollins, Pfister, and Avery</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woods, S., Lawson, R. P., Jensen, E., Bui, T. P., Thornberry, T., Rollins, A., Pfister, L., and Avery, M.:
Microphysical Properties of Tropical Tropopause Layer Cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6053–6069, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028068</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Wu et al.(2008)Wu, Jiang, Read, Austin, Davis, Lambert, Stephens, Vane, and Waters</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, D. L., Jiang, J. H., Read, W. G., Austin, R. T., Davis, C. P., Lambert, A., Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., and Waters, J. W.:
Validation of the Aura MLS cloud ice water content measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D00A24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008931" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008931</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Yang et al.(2000)Yang, Liou, Wyser, and Mitchell</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, P., Liou, K. N., Wyser, K., and Mitchell, D.:
Parameterization of the scattering and absorption properties of individual ice crystals, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 4699–4718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900755" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900755</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Yang et al.(2003)Yang, Baum, Heymsfield, Hu, Huang, Tsay, and Ackerman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, P., Baum, B. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Hu, Y. X., Huang, H.-L., Tsay, S.-C., and Ackerman, S.:
Single-scattering properties of droxtals, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 79–80, 1159–1169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(02)00347-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(02)00347-3</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Yang et al.(2005)Yang, Wei, Huang, Baum, Hu, Kattawar, Mishchenko, and Fu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, P., Wei, H., Huang, H.-L., Baum, B. A., Hu, Y. X., Kattawar, G. W., Mishchenko, M. I., and Fu, Q.:
Scattering and absorption property database for nonspherical ice particles in the near- through far-infrared spectral region, Appl. Optics, 44, 5512–5523, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.005512" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.005512</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Yi et al.(2013)Yi, Yang, Baum, L'Ecuyer, Oreopoulos, Mlawer, Heymsfield, and Liou</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yi, B., Yang, P., Baum, B. A., L'Ecuyer, T., Oreopoulos, L., Mlawer, E. J., Heymsfield, A. J., and Liou, K.-N.:
Influence of Ice Particle Surface Roughening on the Global Cloud Radiative Effect, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2794–2807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-020.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-020.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Zhang et al.(2004)Zhang, Yang, Kattawar, Tsay, Baum, Hu, Heymsfield, and Reichardt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Z., Yang, P., Kattawar, G. W., Tsay, S.-C., Baum, B. A., Hu, Y., Heymsfield, A. J., and Reichardt, J.:
Geometrical-optics solution to light scattering by droxtal ice crystals, Appl. Optics, 43, 2490–2499, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.002490" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.002490</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Zou et al.(2020)Zou, Griessbach, Hoffmann, Gong, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zou, L., Griessbach, S., Hoffmann, L., Gong, B., and Wang, L.:
Revisiting global satellite observations of stratospheric cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9939–9959, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9939-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9939-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Zou et al.(2021)Zou, Hoffmann, Griessbach, Spang, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zou, L., Hoffmann, L., Griessbach, S., Spang, R., and Wang, L.:
Empirical evidence for deep convection being a major source of stratospheric ice clouds over North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10457–10475, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10457-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10457-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Zou et al.(2022)Zou, Griessbach, Hoffmann, and Spang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zou, L., Griessbach, S., Hoffmann, L., and Spang, R.:
A global view on stratospheric ice clouds: assessment of processes related to their occurrence based on satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6677–6702, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6677-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6677-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
