<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-24-11431-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>Long-term (2010–2021) lidar observations of stratospheric aerosols in Wuhan, China</article-title><alt-title>Long-term (2010–2021) lidar observations of stratospheric aerosols in Wuhan, China</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Yun</given-names></name>
          <email>heyun@whu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1119-6016</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Jing</surname><given-names>Dongzhe</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1971-5757</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>Zhenping</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-534X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Ohneiser</surname><given-names>Kevin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>Fan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8368-5081</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430072, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Observatory for Atmospheric Remote Sensing, Wuhan 430072, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany</institution>
        </aff><author-comment content-type="econtrib"><p>These authors contributed equally to this work.</p></author-comment>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yun He (heyun@whu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>October</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>11431</fpage><lpage>11450</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>September</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>September</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>30</day><month>May</month><year>2024</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 Yun He et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e147">This study analyzes the vertical distribution, optical properties, radiative forcing, and several perturbation events of stratospheric aerosols using observations from a ground-based polarization lidar in Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E) from 2010 to 2021. The background stratospheric aerosol optical depth (sAOD) was 0.0044 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0019 at 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as calculated during a stratosphere-quiescent period from January 2013 to August 2017. In addition, several cases of volcanic aerosol and wildfire-induced smoke were observed. Volcanic aerosols from the Nabro (2011) and Raikoke (2019) eruptions (both in boreal summer) increased the sAOD to 2.9 times the background level. Tracers of smoke from the Canadian wildfire in the summer of 2017 were observed twice, at 19–21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 14–17 September and at 20–23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 28–31 October, with a plume-isolated aerosol optical depth (AOD) of 0.002–0.010 and a particle linear depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.14–0.18, indicating the dominance of non-aged smoke particles. During these summertime events, the injected stratospheric aerosols were captured by the large-scale Asian monsoon anticyclone (AMA), confining the transport pathway to mid-latitude Asia. On 8–9 November 2020, smoke plumes originating from the California wildfire in October 2020 appeared at 16–17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.13. Regarding seasonal variation, the sAOD in the cold half-year (0.0054) is 69 % larger than in the warm half-year (0.0032) due to stronger meridional transport of stratospheric aerosols from the tropics to middle latitudes. The stratospheric radiative forcing was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the stratosphere-quiescent period and increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when volcanic aerosols were largely injected. These findings contribute to our understanding of the sources and transport patterns of stratospheric aerosols over mid-latitude Asia and serve as an important database for the validation of model outputs.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42005101</award-id>
<award-id>41927804</award-id>
<award-id>42205130</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>China Scholarship Council</funding-source>
<award-id>202206275006</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province</funding-source>
<award-id>2023AFB617</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e269">The stratospheric aerosol layer (SAL) extends from the tropopause up to approximately 30 km height and is long-lasting, with a residence time of several months to years (Junge, 1960; Junge and Manson, 1961; Hitchman et al., 1994; Kremser et al., 2016). Stratospheric aerosols play a critical role in the global radiation budget by scattering incoming solar radiation back to space during periods of strong loading, resulting in the cooling of the near-surface and lower atmosphere (Thompson and Solomon, 2009; Solomon et al., 2011). In addition, stratospheric aerosols can activate heterogeneous chemistry by serving as a reaction surface, leading to stratospheric ozone depletion (Hofmann and Solomon, 1989; Jäger and Wege, 1990; Ohneiser et al., 2022).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e274">The locations of ground-based lidar sites with long-term stratospheric aerosol observations (solid dots) and two main volcanic eruptions, i.e., Nabro 2011 and Raikoke 2019 (solid triangles), as reported by Kremser et al. (2016), Hofer et al. (2024), and Trickl et al. (2024).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e283">The SAL mainly consists of sulfate aerosols, which are formed from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ash emitted by volcanic eruptions via oxidation and condensation (Gorkavyi et al., 2021). Moreover, other sources also contribute to the SAL, including smoke particles emitted from wildfires, carbonyl sulfide and dimethyl sulfide from the sea, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from anthropogenic activities, emissions from air traffic, and dust aerosols from Asia and Africa (Peterson et al., 2018; Trickl et al., 2024). In general, the long-term characteristics of stratospheric aerosols intermittently show the stratospheric background level (i.e., during the stratosphere-quiescent period) and the SAL perturbations caused by significant volcanic eruptions. Therefore, it is of great importance to evaluate the background level of stratospheric aerosols by taking advantage of the occasional stratosphere-quiescent periods.</p>
      <p id="d1e309">Deshler et al. (2006) found no significant change in background stratospheric aerosol levels from the 1970s to 2004. Similarly, with observations in France, Khaykin et al. (2017) reported a stratospheric aerosol optical depth (sAOD; integrating altitudes of 17–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 2.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during 1997–2003, the lowest since 1970, which can be considered a reference for background levels. Trickl et al. (2013, 2024) calculated the integrated backscatter coefficient (IBC) starting at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the tropopause since 2000, which is lower than the other groups. It is important to note that this differing definition of the lower boundary may result in a negative offset of IBC or sAOD. In contrast, stratospheric aerosols showed an increasing trend in the first decade of the 21st century due to several intense volcanic eruptions (Hofmann et al., 2009; Solomon et al., 2011; Vernier et al., 2011). Another volcanic-eruption-quiescent period was 2013–2019, between the eruptions of Nabro in 2011 and Raikoke in 2019. Meanwhile, intense wildfire events became more frequent, such as the Canadian wildfire in 2017 and 2019; the Siberian wildfire in 2019; the Australian wildfire in 2019; and the California wildfire in 2020 (Ansmann et al., 2022; Mamouri et al., 2023; Ohneiser et al., 2020, 2022; Shang et al., 2021; Veselovskii et al., 2023), which injected a mass of smoke particles into the stratosphere via pyrocumulonimbus clouds. Smoke particles can increase the particle number and surface area concentration of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs), resulting in ozone depletion by halogen activation reactions on the surface of liquid PSC particles (Ansmann et al., 2022). Additionally, previous studies have speculated that the increasing Asian <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions may also contribute to the stratospheric aerosol levels (Vernier et al., 2015), which should be further examined with observations (Kremser et al., 2016). In consequence, continuous observations in the second decade of the 21st century provide a valuable opportunity to estimate the contributors to stratospheric aerosol levels aside from strong volcanic activities.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e370">Specifications of the polarization lidar system at Wuhan University.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center" colsep="1">Transmitter </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">Receiver </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Laser</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Continuum Inlite II-20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Telescope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">300 mm Cassegrain</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">532 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Diameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">300 mm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Energy/pulse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 mJ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Field of view</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 mrad</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Repetition rate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 Hz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PMT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hamamatsu 5783P</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pulse duration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 ns</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Digitizer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Licel TR40-160</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e483">The long-term characteristics of the SAL can be monitored mainly using ground-based lidar observations, balloon-borne in situ measurements, and space-borne detection (Kremser et al., 2016; Bingen et al., 2017; Chouza et al., 2020; Trickl et al., 2024). Lidar is considered a great approach for vertically resolved observation of SALs, providing high spatiotemporal resolution. Long-term ground-based lidar observations are crucial for ensuring the continuity of stratospheric aerosol measurements. There are several long-term (exceeding 1 decade) datasets of stratospheric aerosols observed by lidar at various locations, including Mauna Loa in Hawaii, USA (19.5° N, 156° W; Chouza et al., 2020); NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, USA (37.1° N, 76.3° W; Woods et al., 2003); Garmisch-Partenkirchen in Germany (47.5° N, 11.1° E; Trickl et al., 2013, 2024); São José dos Campos in Brazil (23.2° S, 45.9° W; Clemesha et al., 1997); Tsukuba in Japan (36.1° N, 140.1° E; Sakai et al., 2016); Lauder in Aotearoa / New Zealand (45.0° S, 169.7° E; Sakai et al., 2016); Tomsk in Russia (56.48° N, 85.05° E; Zuev et al., 2017); and the Observatoire de Haute-Provence in France (43.9° N, 5.7° E; Khaykin et al., 2017) (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Since 2010, we have also conducted long-term lidar observations of stratospheric aerosols in Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E), central China, which can be a good supplementation to the geographical coverage of the mid-latitude East Asian region.</p>
      <p id="d1e488">Wuhan is a central Chinese city located in a transitional region between the tropics and mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, significantly impacted by the Asian monsoon in summer. The Asian monsoon anticyclone (AMA) emerges in response to persistent deep convection over India and southeast Asia during the boreal summer (Garny and Randel, 2016), controlling the transport patterns of aerosol plumes in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) over East Asia. The AMA captures volcanic-emitted stratospheric aerosols to retain and transport at mid-latitudes in Asia (Zhuang and Yi, 2016; Jing et al., 2023). Moreover, the AMA facilitates efficient vertical transport of tropospheric aerosols to the UTLS (Garny and Randel, 2016; Yu et al., 2017), forming the so-called “Asian tropopause aerosol layer” (ATAL), which may also contribute to stratospheric aerosol levels. Therefore, conducting long-term lidar observations in such a location is highly valuable.</p>
      <p id="d1e491">In this study, we analyze the long-term characteristics of stratospheric aerosols over Wuhan using persistent observations from a ground-based polarization lidar together with data from several spaceborne instruments during 2010–2021. This paper is organized as follows. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> provides a brief description of the instruments used and the data processing methods. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, we present the statistical characteristics and significant injection events of stratospheric aerosols. Last, a summary and conclusions are presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Instrumentation, data, and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Ground-based polarization lidar in Wuhan</title>
      <p id="d1e513">The vertically resolved optical properties of stratospheric aerosols have been observed with a 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> polarization lidar in Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E) since October 2010 (He et al., 2021, 2022; Yin et al., 2021). A detailed description of the lidar system can be found in previous studies (Kong and Yi, 2015; He and Yi, 2015). Specifications of the polarization lidar system are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Benefiting from the installation of a transparent waterproof window in 2017, the lidar system can perform continuously regardless of rainy or snowy conditions (Yi et al., 2021) from then on except for the necessary maintenance.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e529">Estimated uncertainties of the lidar-derived parameters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Uncertainty</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Volume depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kong and Yi (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 %–10 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mamouri et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Zhuang and Yi (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Extinction coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kafle and Coulter (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stratospheric aerosol optical depth, sAOD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 %–25 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Vaughan et al. (2021)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e690"><bold>(a)</bold> The ozone number density and <bold>(b)</bold> the backscatter coefficient that is ozone-corrected (red line) and not ozone-corrected (black line) over Wuhan at 00:00–03:59 LT (local time) on 5 February 2020. The blue line represents the residual of the backscatter coefficient after ozone correction.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e705">Raw data are stored with resolutions of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Fernald method (Fernald, 1984) was used to retrieve the backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol extinction coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using a fixed aerosol lidar ratio of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the long-term (2010–2021) and 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for smoke events (Canadian wildfire in 2017 and California wildfire in 2020) (Haarig et al., 2018). The volume depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as the ratio of perpendicular- to parallel-oriented signals, multiplied by the gain ratio, and then converted into the particle depolarization ratio (PDR) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Freudenthaler et al., 2009). The same as Trickl et al. (2024), we use 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the tropopause as the lower limit for sAOD calculation to avoid the influence of tropospheric aerosols and to incorporate the stratospheric aerosols as much as possible. Therefore, the stratospheric aerosol optical depth (sAOD) is calculated by integrating the aerosol extinction coefficient from 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the tropopause to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to minimize disturbances from the troposphere and ensure a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The uncertainties in the derived parameters, as well as the corresponding references, are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e812">In addition, an algorithm developed by Yin et al. (2021) was used to screen out all the cloud-free profiles, utilizing a height resolution of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a time resolution of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to ensure a sufficient SNR, with a sliding average of 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for height. The Rayleigh fit method was used to find the reference altitude between 5 and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a width of 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which the signal is close to the molecular signal derived from meteorological data provided by the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) (Baars et al., 2016). The reference value was set to 0.018 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (corresponding to an extinction coefficient of 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The molecule backscatter coefficient and extinction coefficient are calculated based on the method presented by Bucholtz (1995), with an uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 %. Fernald forward inversion was then applied up to an altitude of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to calculate the profiles of the backscatter coefficient and extinction coefficient. Due to the weak signal of stratospheric aerosols, different data processing methods can lead to significant variations in the specific values of the results. From October 2010 to September 2021, 775 nighttime cloud-free profiles were selected for long-term statistical analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e908">Absorption by ozone in the stratosphere was also taken into account. The ozone absorption coefficient is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M49" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ozone absorption cross-section (Gorshelev et al., 2014), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ozone number density (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a). We utilized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles from the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reanalysis data within latitudes of 28.0–31.8° N and longitudes of 113.0–114.5° E. To correct aerosol extinction by considering ozone absorption, the seasonal average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles from 2015 were employed as the representative ozone levels for each season through our measurement period, i.e., March–April–May for spring, June–July–August for summer, September–October–November for autumn, and December–January–February for winter. The relative uncertainty of the backscatter coefficient profile was less than 5 %. As an example, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b shows the backscatter coefficient profile with and without correction for ozone absorption on 5 February 2020. The mean residual between 15 and 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is approximately 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which cannot be ignored.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>CALIOP spaceborne lidar</title>
      <p id="d1e1111">The spaceborne lidar CALIOP, carried on the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite, has been widely used to observe the vertically resolved optical and microphysical properties of aerosols and clouds since 2006 (Winker et al., 2007). It is capable of measuring the elastic backscatter at both 532 and 1064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the depolarization ratio at 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near the nadir.</p>
      <p id="d1e1130">In this study, CALIOP version 4.10 Level-1B data were used to track smoke plumes from September to October 2017 and from October to November 2020, illustrating their vertical distributions and optical properties. In addition, the CALIOP Level-3 stratospheric aerosol profile product (Kar et al., 2019) provides monthly mean aerosol optical properties on a spatial grid of 5° in latitude and 20° in longitude. It should be mentioned that the CALIOP Level-3 product consistently exhibits a bit higher aerosol extinction compared with the other satellite-based datasets (Chouza et al., 2020). Moreover, monthly mean tropopause altitudes from MERRA-2 (Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2) reanalysis were provided in the CALIOP Level-3 stratospheric aerosol profile product.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>OMPS</title>
      <p id="d1e1141">The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) is installed on the joint NASA/NOAA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (Suomi NPP) satellite, launched in October 2011 (Jaross et al., 2014). OMPS comprises three spectrometers: a downward-looking nadir mapper, a nadir profiler, and a limb profiler. The UV Aerosol Index (UVAI) is an effective indicator of UV-absorbing aerosols, discerning between aerosol absorption and Rayleigh scattering, which is provided by the nadir-mapper instrument on the Suomi-NPP satellite at a spatial resolution of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The UVAI has been widely employed in detecting elevated aerosols with significant absorption in the atmosphere, such as smoke and dust (Penning de Vries et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2015; Tao et al., 2022). In this study, the UVAI provided by the OMPS-NPP Level-2 data product was used to show the horizontal spatial distribution of smoke plumes.</p>
      <p id="d1e1167">Additionally, OMPS-NPP Level-3 data provide aerosol extinction coefficients at a spatial resolution of 5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15° lat–long grid measured by a limb profiler sensor. The monthly mean sAOD at 510 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 32.5° N, 112.5° E, provided by OMPS-NPP Level-3 data product, was used to estimate the evolution of Canadian smoke aerosols over Asia from August to November 2017. Furthermore, the monthly mean tropopause altitudes from August 2020 to September 2021 were also presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>HYSPLIT model</title>
      <p id="d1e1193">The NOAA/ARL (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Air Resources Laboratory) Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model (Draxler and Rolph., 2003; Stein et al., 2015) can simulate the forward and backward trajectories of an air mass by giving a starting time and an initial altitude and geographical location. The meteorological field from the GDAS archive (Kanamitsu, 1989) was used to drive the model in the calculation. In this study, the simulated backward trajectories were used to track the transport pathway and to confirm the source of smoke plumes.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1198"><bold>(a)</bold> Time–height contour plots of the aerosol backscatter coefficient measured by 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> polarization lidar over Wuhan during 2010–2021; the white curve represents the monthly mean tropopause from CALIOP (October 2010 to July 2020) and OMPS (August 2020 to September 2021). <bold>(b)</bold> The evolution of monthly mean 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sAOD from 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the tropopause to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from polarization lidar observation (black curve) in Wuhan. The dashed red line represents the background sAOD of 0.0044.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Overview of stratospheric aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e1260">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the long-term evolution of vertically resolved aerosol backscatter coefficient and sAOD over Wuhan from 2010 to 2021. The monthly mean tropopause altitudes are provided by the CALIOP (before August 2020) and OMPS (after August 2020) Level-3 data products (represented by the white curve). In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a, the white pixels and stripes are due to a lack of observations or insufficient SNRs. A stratospheric background aerosol layer, known as the “Junge Layer”, consisting primarily of sulfate from the oxidation of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or OCS (carbonyl sulfide) (Junge, 1960; Junge and Manson, 1961; Kremser, et al., 2016), persistently appeared during that period at altitudes of 19.5–23.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an average extinction coefficient of 0.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Three significant episodes with more abundant tropospheric aerosols injected are evident: volcanic aerosols from the 2011 Nabro eruption and the 2019 Raikoke eruption, as well as smoke aerosols from the 2017 Canadian wildfire event. Moreover, a weak aerosol plume from the 2020 California wildfire event was also observed.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1303">Stratospheric aerosol optical depths at different sites worldwide. The sAOD values at Tsukuba and Lauder are obtained by multiplying the integrated backscatter coefficients (IBCs) by a lidar ratio. In Wuhan, the period from 2010 to 2021 represents the entire lidar measurement period, while the period from January 2013 to August 2017 represents a local (only for Wuhan) stratosphere-quiescent period. Note that the Garmisch-Partenkirchen group did not provide the average values of IBC or sAOD; thus, only 694 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sAOD in 1979, calculated from the IBC by multiplying it by a lidar ratio, is given here as a reference value of the stratospheric aerosol level. The results in this study are shown in bold font.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="34mm" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="25mm" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="26mm" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="19mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Period</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wavelength</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Lidar</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">sAOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Integral range</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Reference</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ratio</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1"><bold>Wuhan, China</bold> <bold>(30.5° N</bold>, <bold>114.4° E)</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><bold>2010–2021</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>532</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>50</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><bold>5.6</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>3.4</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1"><bold>Tropopause</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>1 km</bold><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>30 km</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>This study</bold></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>Jan 2013–Aug 2017</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>4.4</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>1.9</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tsukuba, Japan (36.1° N, 140.1° E)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000–2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">532</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Tropopause–33 km</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Sakai et al.(2016)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lauder, Aotearoa / New Zealand (45.0° S, 169.7° E)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000–2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">532</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Tropopause–33 km</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Sakai et al.(2016)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2">Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, USA (19.5° N, 155.6° E)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">1999–2006</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">532</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">2.9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17–33 km</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7" morerows="1">Chouza et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">2006–2013</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">5.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan 2013–Jul 2019</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2">Observatoire de Haute-Provence, France (43.9° N, 5.7° E)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">1994–2003</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">532</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">2.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17–30 km</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7" morerows="1">Khaykin et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2013–2014</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="2">Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany (47°20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 11°3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">1976–1990</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">694</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5" morerows="1">2.5 (background at 694 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1979)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" morerows="3">Tropopause <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the top of the aerosol layer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7" morerows="1">Trickl et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1991–2023</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">532</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1821">The stratosphere-quiescent period from January 2013 to August 2017 can be defined as reflecting the background level of stratospheric aerosols over Wuhan. The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) is a general indicator of the explosive character of a volcanic eruption (Newhall and Self, 1982). It compositely estimates Walker's magnitude, intensity, destructiveness, dispersive power, and energy release rate and is assigned a value from 1 to 8. Two volcanoes with a VEI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 erupted during this period: Kelud in Indonesia (7.9° S) in February 2014 and Wolf in the Galápagos Islands (0.0° N) in May 2015. Kelud volcanic aerosols were reported to be detected over high latitudes in Tomsk (56.5° N) (Zuev et al., 2017) and the Observatoire de Haute-Provence (OHP) (43.9° N) (Khaykin et al. 2017) in January 2015 due to the meridional aerosol transport. However, no aerosol plumes were observed by our lidar over Wuhan in the first quarter of 2015, and the increase in sAOD during this period cannot be attributed to a significant influence of Kelud. Several reasons are considered. First, it cannot be completely ruled out that a few Kelud aerosol plumes passed over Wuhan but were not observed due to weather conditions or hardware maintenance. Second, aerosol meridional transport from tropical into extratropical (middle) latitudes generally intensifies during the cold half of the year (October to March of the following year) (Niwano et al., 2009), causing an increase in aerosol optical properties in winter (Sakai et al., 2016; Zuev et al., 2017). An increase in sAOD at the turn of the year might be largely attributed to the seasonal variation of tropopause height (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b). A detailed discussion of seasonal characteristics will be presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether the increase in sAOD at the beginning of 2015 was due to the influence of Kelud or the seasonal meridional transport of tropical aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d1e1836">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> lists the lidar-derived sAOD at different sites worldwide. Note that the sAOD values at Tsukuba, Lauder, and Garmisch-Partenkirchen are obtained by multiplying the integrated backscatter coefficients (IBCs) by a lidar ratio of 50 or 46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mean background sAOD (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the tropopause to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over Wuhan was 0.0044 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0019), as obtained from January 2013 to August 2017. Due to the weak signal of stratospheric aerosols, different data processing methods can lead to variations in the exact sAOD values. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the sAOD during the stratosphere-quiescent period over OHP increased from 0.0024 during 1997–2003 to 0.0028 during 2013–2014, suggesting the contribution of volcanic aerosols in the first decade of the 21st century. It is interesting to note that before 2006, volcanic eruptions with VEI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 mainly occurred in the tropics (Chouza et al., 2020) and did not cause a noticeable enhancement of sAOD (or IBC) at mid-latitude sites in the Northern Hemisphere, revealing that tropical volcanic aerosols emitted during these events were not significantly transported northward.</p>
      <p id="d1e1880">The volcanic aerosol layers from the Nabro and Raikoke eruptions can be observed above Wuhan at altitudes 15–25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the second half of 2011 and 2019, respectively (Zhuang and Yi, 2016; Jing et al., 2023). An enhanced sAOD of 0.013 was observed during both the Nabro and Raikoke events, which was 2.9 times the background sAOD (0.0044). Another enhancement of the backscatter coefficient appeared around 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after September 2017, caused by the smoke aerosol injection from the Canadian wildfire event in August 2017. The intense pyrocumulonimbus (PyroCb) released approximately 0.1–0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols into the low stratosphere, comparable in quantity to those emitted from a moderate volcanic eruption (Peterson et al., 2018). The smoke plumes over Wuhan will be analyzed further in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1909">In addition, stratospheric aerosols are contributed by other tropospheric sources. Periodic increases in the backscatter coefficient were observed below an altitude of 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the summer. The majority of these aerosol layers existed below the tropopause and are known as the ATAL (Vernier et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015). The AMA emerges in response to persistent deep convection over India and southeast Asia during the boreal summer (Garny and Randel, 2016), leading to efficient vertical transport from the surface to the UTLS (Baker et al., 2011). Due to extensive human activities and the influence of the AMA, the ATAL forms and exists in the UTLS at altitudes of 13–18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over megacities, consisting mainly of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols (Vernier et al., 2015). The observation of the ATAL confirmed that anthropogenic aerosols and/or their gas-phase precursors can be transported to the UTLS, although they are generally removed effectively through precipitation, according to previous understanding (Mari et al., 2010).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1930"><bold>(a)</bold> The nighttime backscatter coefficient of volcanic aerosols of Nabro from June to October 2011. White stripes represent that data are unavailable due to unfavorable weather conditions or hardware maintenance. <bold>(b)</bold> The backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles of Nabro aerosol plume derived from polarization lidar observations over Wuhan.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Volcanic aerosol plumes</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Nabro volcanic aerosols in 2011</title>
      <p id="d1e1970">The Nabro volcano (13.4° N, 41.7° E) erupted on 12 June 2011, and the emitted volcanic aerosols were transported eastward to Wuhan from 19 June onward (Zhuang and Yi, 2016), as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. The volcanic aerosols persistently appeared over Wuhan at altitudes of 16–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until October 2011. During the initial stage, the Nabro aerosol plume exhibited a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 16.0–19.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 8 July and 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 17.0–19.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 12 July. Such strong variability in both the backscatter coefficient and vertical distribution suggests an inhomogeneous spatial density of the aerosol plume. After August 2011, the Nabro aerosol plume generally diffused over a wider altitude range of 15–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a smaller mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, the integrated backscatter coefficient steadily decreased from mid-August to December, yielding an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding decay time of approximately 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as reported by Zhuang and Yi (2016).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2124"><bold>(a)</bold> The nighttime backscatter coefficient of volcanic aerosols of Raikoke from July to November 2019. White stripes represent that data are unavailable due to weather conditions or hardware maintenance. The backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles of <bold>(b)</bold> the main aerosol plume and <bold>(c)</bold> CCC derived from polarization lidar observations over Wuhan.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Raikoke volcanic aerosols in 2019</title>
      <p id="d1e2160">Raikoke volcano (48.3° N, 153.3° E) erupted on 21–22 June 2019, resulting in two types of volcanic aerosol plumes, i.e., the main aerosol plume and a small but impacted aerosol cloud known as “coherent circular cloud” (CCC), as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. Jing et al. (2023) studied the transport pathway of the Raikoke volcanic aerosols and their optical properties over Wuhan. The main aerosol plume was initially transported eastward across North America, the Atlantic, and Europe before mid-July, eventually reaching south of Sakhalin Island on 22 July. Driven by the AMA, the transport pathway then turned southwestward, arriving in Wuhan on 25 July, having a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This main aerosol plume intermittently diffused at 15–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Wuhan in the following months. Observations showed a decrease in layer-mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 2 August to 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 23 September over Wuhan. Note that an intense Siberian wildfire took place meanwhile in the summer of 2019 (19 July to 14 August). Ohneiser et al. (2021) and Ansmann et al. (2024) found that large amounts of the smoke were transported into the central Arctic and were trapped by the polar vortex; thus, less smoke was transported to the low latitudes. Moreover, Jing et al. (2023) have discussed that the stratospheric aerosol plumes observed over Wuhan are probably only from the Raikoke eruption because the plume-isolated 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AODs for Siberian smoke are approximately 0.1, as observed in Leipzig (Ansmann et al., 2021) and in the Arctic (Ohneiser et al., 2021), which are much larger than those for Raikoke volcanic aerosol layers observed in Wuhan (0.001–0.017, Jing et al., 2023), Leipzig (0.010–0.015; Ansmann et al., 2021), and Capel Dewi Atmospheric Observatory in the UK (0.01–0.05, Vaughan et al., 2021).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2275">The 4 h integrated nighttime <bold>(a)</bold> particle backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> volume depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by polarization lidar over Wuhan from September to October 2017. White stripes represent that data are unavailable due to weather conditions or hardware maintenance. The white curve represents the altitudes of the tropopause. The aerosol backscatter coefficient <bold>(c)</bold> and particle depolarization ratio <bold>(d)</bold> profiles derived from polarization lidar observations.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2319">In addition, another impacted volcanic aerosol plume with a narrow horizontal extent of approximately 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, known as CCC, first appeared at 19–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near Kamchatka, Russia, on 18 July. It then moved southward to latitudes between 20 and 30° N, completing three full-circle transport cycles around the Earth over the following 2 months (Chouza et al., 2020; Gorkavyi et al., 2021). Interestingly, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, the first two circles were observed by our polarization lidar when the CCC passed over Wuhan, at approximately 21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 30 July and at around 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 24 August. The peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of CCC was measured to be 6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 30 July and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 24 August, an order of magnitude larger than that of the main aerosol plume.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Smoke aerosol plumes</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Canadian wildfire smoke in 2017</title>
      <p id="d1e2430">In August 2017, severe wildfires occurred in western Canada and the northwestern USA (Peterson et al., 2018). Large amounts of smoke were rapidly lifted to the UTLS (within less than an hour) through the formation of pyrocumulonimbus clouds. A portion of the smoke plume that separated from the initial emission was transported to mid-latitudes and later was observed over Wuhan in September 2017. The detail of the transport of this smoke plume to Wuhan is described in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows the backscatter coefficient and depolarization ratio derived from polarization lidar observations over Wuhan from September to October 2017. The white curve represents the altitude of the tropopause. Smoke aerosol plumes were first observed on 14–17 September at altitudes of 19.0–21.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.05–0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.14–0.18 were relatively large, suggesting that the smoke layer was composed of irregularly shaped, dry, and non-coated soot particles (Ansmann et al., 2018; Ohneiser et al., 2020). A period of 1.5 months later, two distinct smoke layers appeared at altitudes of 20.3–21.5 and 22.1–23.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.16. Compared with the mid-September measurements, the smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the dissipation of smoke plumes over time. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained almost unchanged, confirming that the aging process of smoke particles is rather slow in the stratosphere compared with that in the troposphere. Chemical interactions with trace gases in the troposphere are more likely to alter the shape of smoke particles (China et al., 2015). The plume-isolated aerosol optical depth (AOD) from September to October was 0.002–0.010, at least an order of magnitude larger than the background sAOD (0.0044) over Wuhan.</p>
      <p id="d1e2567">As a comparison, Canadian wildfire smoke measured over OHP, France, from 24 August to 26 September showed a similar (to Wuhan) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of approximately 0.15 (Khaykin et al., 2018). However, the plume-insolated AOD for this smoke event is much larger in Europe. A plume-isolated AOD of up to 0.7 was measured over OHP, France, on 29 August, which was 2 orders of magnitude larger than that of 0.002–0.010 over Wuhan (Khaykin et al., 2018). Similarly, the layer-integrated AOD of the smoke plume reached 0.3 in the free troposphere and 0.6 in the stratosphere over Košetice, Czech Republic, on 22 August (Ansmann et al., 2018). Measurements of smoke aerosols over Europe based on the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) showed larger sAOD values from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 on 21–23 August to 0.005–0.030 on 5–10 September (Baars et al., 2019). This is because the Canadian smoke mainly remained and was transported at high latitudes in the first 2 months after the wildfire event.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2590">OMPS-NPP Level-3 monthly mean sAOD from August to November 2017.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2600">Using the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere (CLaMS), Kloss et al. (2019) found that the fire plume initialized on 12–14 August over western Canada and was transported eastward at latitudes north of 40° N. The plumes passed over Europe in early August to mid-August and reached the Asian monsoon area at the end of August, with a fraction moving to low latitudes along the eastern flank of the AMA. When the AMA broke down in September, the smoke plume had spread throughout the Northern Hemisphere. Previous studies have shown that stratospheric aerosols at high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere can be transported to the middle and low latitudes via the AMA (Kloss et al., 2021; Jing et al., 2023). In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, the OMPS monthly mean sAOD generally increased from a background level of 0.004 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.010 to the north of 40° N and 0.007 near Wuhan (30.5° N) in September. Subsequently, the sAOD near Wuhan decreased to 0.006 in October and 0.005 in November. However, the spatial distribution of sAOD confirms that the smoke aerosols mainly remained at high latitudes with sAOD values exceeding 0.010.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2614">The 1 h integrated nighttime <bold>(a)</bold> particle backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> volume depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from polarization lidar over Wuhan on 8–9 November 2020. White stripes represent that data are unavailable due to weather conditions or hardware maintenance. The white curve represents the altitudes of the tropopause. The profiles of the <bold>(c)</bold> aerosol backscatter coefficient and <bold>(d)</bold> particle depolarization ratio derived from polarization lidar observations are also provided.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Californian wildfire smoke in 2020</title>
      <p id="d1e2666">In October 2020, record-breaking wildfires occurred in California, emitting a significant amount of smoke into the UTLS, which was then transported eastward (Safford et al., 2022). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> shows the polarization lidar observation over Wuhan on 8–9 November 2020. A thin aerosol layer was observed above the tropopause at 16–17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.13, indicating that the aerosol layer mainly consisted of non-spherical smoke particles. Rapid lofting into the dry upper troposphere prevents the aging of the smoke particles (Baars et al., 2019). In Cyprus, smoke aerosols from this Californian wildfire were observed earlier on 27 October at 11–13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 1–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mamouri et al., 2023), an order of magnitude larger than that observed in Wuhan. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured in Cyprus was 0.10–0.15, consistent with that over Wuhan (0.13), indicating the slow aging process of smoke aerosols in the stratosphere. The detail of smoke plume transport to Wuhan is described in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2782">Profiles of seasonal mean aerosol backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during <bold>(a)</bold> the stratosphere-quiescent period from January 2013 to August 2017 and <bold>(b)</bold> the entire period from 2010 to 2021. The dashed lines represent the tropopause for each season. The shadings represent the standard deviations.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Seasonal variation</title>
      <p id="d1e2817">Understanding the seasonal variations in stratospheric aerosol patterns is crucial for gaining deeper insights into their feedback on weather and climate. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a shows the profiles of the seasonal mean backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Wuhan for each season during the stratosphere-quiescent period from January 2013 to August 2017 as well as during the whole measurement period. Here, the four seasons are defined as follows: spring (March–April–May), summer (June–July–August), autumn (September–October–November), and winter (December–January–February). The seasonal mean tropopause heights were 13.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring, 16.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer, 15.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in autumn, and 13.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter. At altitudes of 19.5–23.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an enhancement of aerosol extinction was observed in all seasons, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This non-seasonal background is interpreted as the Junge layer, a global-wide stratospheric aerosol layer at around 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude (Junge, 1960; Junge and Manson, 1961).</p>
      <p id="d1e2936">In summer, another distinct aerosol layer was observed at 13–18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.023 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, approximately 1.4–1.6 times larger than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in other seasons. This layer was contributed by ATAL. The AOD of ATAL at 13–18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Wuhan was 0.0057, consistent with an increasing AOD of 0.002–0.006 at 13–18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the entire ATAL region (15–45° N, 5–105° E) during 1995–2013 (Vernier et al., 2015). The AMA facilitates efficient vertical transport from the surface to the UTLS, serving as a primary source of young air in the lower stratosphere (Randel et al., 2010) and bringing anthropogenic aerosols and/or their gas-phase precursors from the lower troposphere to the UTLS. Furthermore, injections of aerosols from volcanic eruptions and wildfires caused the larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.019 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 16–22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer and autumn (compared with 0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter and 0.012 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring) because Wuhan was generally affected by those events during the summer and autumn months by the summer monsoon circulation, which promotes effective mixing between the extratropics and tropics and influences the tropical seasonal cycle of different atmospheric components (Abalos et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e3097">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, we present the differences in the mean sAOD between the cold half-year (October–next March) and warm half-year (April–September). The mean sAOD in the cold half-year was 0.0054, approximately 69 % larger than that of 0.0032 in the warm half-year because the lower tropopause height in winter leads to a wider integration range of sAOD compared with summer. In addition, aerosols transported meridionally from the tropics to middle and high latitudes generally intensified the cold half-year in the Northern Hemisphere (Niwano et al., 2009). This process provides additional aerosol mass from the stratospheric tropical aerosol reservoir. The winter backscatter above 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also larger than that of summer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). Similarly, Zuev et al. (2017) found that the integrated backscatter coefficient was larger over Tomsk, Russia, during the cold half-year from 2000 to 2016. This pattern was also observed in Tsukuba, Japan, where the stratospheric aerosol backscatter ratio was 40 % larger in winter than in summer at 22–23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 1997 to 2004 (Sakai et al., 2016).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3123">Monthly mean sAOD integrated from 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the tropopause to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the cold half-year (October–next March) and warm half-year (April–September). For each box, the center line represents the median value, and the bottom and top edges of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers were set to be 1.5.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3150">Temporal variations of stratospheric aerosol radiative forcing and sAOD over Wuhan. The red points represent the corrected radiative forcing caused by smoke aerosols.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Radiative forcing by stratospheric aerosols</title>
      <p id="d1e3168">Stratospheric aerosols modify radiative fluxes by scattering and absorbing solar radiation. Hence amounts of aerosols emitted from those great volcanic eruptions, such as the 1815 Tambora eruption and 1991 Pinatubo eruption, can significantly cool the global climate (Solomon et al., 2011). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> shows the estimated radiative forcing (RF) induced by stratospheric aerosols and sAOD over Wuhan from 2010 to 2021. Radiative forcing was calculated by multiplying the sAOD by a conversion factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black points) (Hansen et al., 2005; Solomon et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e3197">The radiative forcing of smoke is very complicated, depending on the surface albedo as well as the composition (Heinold et al., 2022). Black carbon (BC) in wildfire smoke generally exhibits strong absorption of solar radiation, unlike sulfate aerosols that reflect solar energy back to space, leading to different climate responses. Therefore, the conversion factor from sAOD to RF should be re-estimated to obtain a more reliable RF. The organic carbon (OC) and BC emissions from biomass burning are generally proportional. According to Koch (2001), the organic matter (OM) to BC mass ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is set to be 7.9 and the OC to OM mass ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is assumed to be 1.3. As estimated by Hansen et al. (2005), the conversion factors from AOD to RF are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for OC and 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BC. As a result, the contribution of sAOD to RF can be divided into three parts: background sAOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sAOD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">background</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), OC sAOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sAOD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and BC sAOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sAOD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The RF during the smoke injection period can be calculated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M192" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">smoke</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sAOD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">background</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sAOD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sAOD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sAOD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">background</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 0.0044, as given in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>. The corrected RF during the smoke intrusion period is presented (red points) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. After the correction, smoke RF becomes slightly weaker.</p>
      <p id="d1e3388">The RF values mainly range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The 2011 Nabro and 2019 Raikoke eruptions caused remarkable cooling effects as the RF of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The stratosphere-quiescent period shows a stable trend of RF around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, representing the stratospheric background aerosol level over Wuhan. On the contrary, Solomon et al. (2011) found that global stratospheric aerosols have been increasing by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on satellite observations in the previous decade from 2000 to 2010. The abundant volcanic activities caused a significant increase in stratospheric aerosols. There were 12 eruptions with VEI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 in the tropics and Northern Hemisphere before 2010 as reviewed by Chouza et al. (2020). By contrast, only three volcanos erupted with VEI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 after 2010, i.e., the Nabro volcano in Eritrea in 2011, the Kelud volcano in Indonesia in 2014, and Wolf in the Galápagos Islands in 2015.</p>
      <p id="d1e3534">The mean RF during smoke observation periods was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with the conclusion drawn by Hansen et al. (2005) that biomass burning (BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC) shows a negative forcing. This value was close to the background level of stratospheric aerosols and resulted in weaker negative forcing compared with sulfate aerosols. This is due to the absorption of solar radiation by BC, which offsets a portion of solar radiation reflected by OC and background aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d1e3569">For comparison, Chouza et al. (2020) measured a close value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, during a volcanic-eruption-quiescent period in 2013–2019. Khaykin et al. (2017) measured the background value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over OHP, France, during 1997–2003. Meanwhile, different data processing methods can lead to significant variations in the specific values of the results due to the weakness of stratospheric aerosols.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e3622">The conceptual diagram of the transport of stratospheric aerosols over East Asia.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3640">This study analyzes the long-term characteristics of stratospheric aerosols over Wuhan from 2010 to 2021, mainly using ground-based polarization lidar observations in conjunction with several satellite observations. The eruptions of the volcanoes Nabro in 2011 and Raikoke in 2019 increased the sAOD by a factor of 2.9 compared to the stratosphere-quiescent period (January 2013 to August 2017). During this stratosphere-quiescent period, the sAOD integrated from 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the tropopause to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.0044 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0019), reflecting the background level of stratospheric aerosols over Wuhan, consistent with previous studies during a similar period (Khaykin et al., 2017; Chouza et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e3666">We also presented observations of the volcanic aerosol layers from the Nabro eruption in 2011 and the Raikoke eruption in 2019 over Wuhan, which have been discussed in detail in our previous studies (Zhuang and Yi, 2016; Jing et al., 2023). In late August 2017, a historically severe wildfire in western Canada emitted large amounts of smoke to the UTLS; a portion of the smoke plume was transported to Wuhan in September 2017. Two layers with enhanced aerosol extinction were observed: the first with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 19.0–20.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 14 September and the second with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 20.3–23.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 28 October. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were 0.14–0.18, suggesting the composition of irregularly shaped, dry, and non-coated soot particles. The plume-isolated AODs were 0.002–0.010. Additionally, smoke plumes from the Californian wildfire in October 2020 appeared over Wuhan at 16–17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 8–9 November 2020, with a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.13.</p>
      <p id="d1e3818">Seasonal variations were also studied. The ATAL at 13–18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.023 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1.4–1.6 times larger than in other seasons during the stratosphere-quiescent period. The mean AOD of the ATAL was 0.0057, confirming that anthropogenic aerosols are an important source of UTLS aerosols. Volcanic aerosols primarily enhanced the mean stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both summer and autumn (0.019 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which were relatively smaller in winter (0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and spring (0.012 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as the volcanic aerosols dissipated. The mean sAOD during the cold half-year (0.0054) was 69 % higher than during the warm half-year (0.0032), indicating stronger meridional transport of stratospheric aerosols from the tropics to middle and high latitudes.</p>
      <p id="d1e3944">The long-term stratospheric aerosol radiative forcing over Wuhan is also presented, revealing the cooling effect caused by stratospheric aerosols. The mean radiative forcing was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the entire period and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the stratosphere-quiescent period. The 2011 Nabro and 2019 Raikoke eruptions resulted in a significant cooling effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e4021">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> shows the conceptual diagram of the transport of stratospheric aerosols over East Asia. Wuhan is located in a region significantly impacted by the Asian monsoon from June to September. The AMA captures long-range-transported stratospheric aerosols from volcanic eruptions at mid-latitudes. Stratospheric aerosols are then transported along the eastern flank of the AMA, increasing the sAOD over Wuhan (Zhuang and Yi, 2016; Jing et al., 2023). Additionally, the buildup of the ATAL is facilitated by the vertical transport of tropospheric aerosols to 13–18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sustained by the convective activity of the Asian monsoon (Garny and Randel, 2016; Yu et al., 2017). Canadian smoke was transported to Wuhan via a weakening AMA in September 2017. Due to the breakup of the AMA after September, smoke plumes can move directly to Wuhan (e.g., Californian wildfire smoke in November 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e4034">Owing to the persistent operation of the polarization lidar from 2010 to 2021, we have developed a comprehensive sketch of the long-term characteristics of stratospheric aerosols over Wuhan, including the variations in sAOD, significant stratospheric injection events, seasonal variations, and radiative forcing. This study is an important supplement to stratospheric aerosol measurements in mid-latitude areas, particularly over East Asia, where human activities are abundant. Additionally, the analyses help us better understand how stratospheric aerosols respond to regional and global climate change (Solomon et al., 2011). However, there are some limitations to our study. Further long-term observation is necessary to achieve continuous monitoring during the stratosphere-quiescent period. The impact on ozone depletion during stratospheric aerosol injection events is also an essential topic (Ohneiser et al., 2022). In addition, more accurate aerosol extinction coefficients and lidar ratios can be obtained with a high spectral resolution lidar. The system with a larger telescope will also improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at higher altitudes, extending the extinction measurements to higher than 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title/>
      <p id="d1e4056">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F13"/> shows the main trajectories of smoke plumes transported in the Northern Hemisphere between 16 August and 21 October 2017 based on CALIOP observations. A large PyroCb plume, referred to as plume O, developed and reached the lower stratosphere on 12–13 August over Canada (Peterson et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2019; Sicard et al., 2019; Torres et al., 2020; Das et al., 2021; Lestrelin et al., 2021). Plume O was transported eastward crossing the Atlantic, reaching western Europe on 27 August (yellow line). It then split into three plumes due to the wind shear prevailing in the associated jet stream (Lestrelin et al., 2021). We identified their transport pathways using CALIOP observations, denoting them as plume I (dark red), plume II (blue), and plume III (green).</p>
      <p id="d1e4061">From September to mid-October, plume II (blue) and III (green) moved eastward between 40–60° N, completing a full circle. Plume I (dark red) moved eastward to Central Asia, turned south to the mid-latitudes in early September, and then moved westward generally along 30° N, completing three-quarters of a circle to the east coast of China by 21 October. In addition, plume IV (purple) was first observed over the central North Pacific by CALIOP on 3 October, moving westward and approaching plume I southeast of Japan on 19 October. However, tracking plume IV before 3 October was difficult. We speculate that plume IV separated from plume II in early October due to wind shear.</p>
      <p id="d1e4064">The sources of two periods of smoke plumes observed over Wuhan were tracked using CALIOP observations and the HYSPLIT model, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F14"/>. The September plume originated from plume II, observed at altitudes of 18–21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with central coordinates at 59.5° N, 35.9° E on 4 September by CALIOP (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F14"/>a). Part of the plume II was transported southeastward to Wuhan on 15 September, based on a 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> backward trajectory simulation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F14"/>c and d). Meanwhile, an elongated aerosol layer at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed by CALIOP near Wuhan on 17 September (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F14"/>b) confirmed that smoke aerosols had been transported to mid-latitudes. The October plume came from plume I and plume IV, observed at 20.8 and 23.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, on 19 October south of Japan (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F14"/>e). They continued moving westward together and were observed over Wuhan at altitudes of 22.8 and 21.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. </p>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F13"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e4122"><bold>(a)</bold> Transport pathways and <bold>(b)</bold> altitude evolution of smoke plumes between 16 August and 21 October 2017 based on CALIOP observations. CALIOP observations were unavailable on 5–14 September due to solar activity; thus, the potential vorticity tracking in Lestrelin et al. (2021) was shown instead with the dashed lines.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F14"><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d1e4139">CALIOP-observed 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total attenuated backscatter coefficients on <bold>(a)</bold> 4 September, <bold>(b)</bold> 17 September, <bold>(e)</bold> 19 October, and <bold>(f)</bold> 20 October 2017. <bold>(c)</bold> The UVAI measured by OMPS on 4 September. The backward trajectories starting from Wuhan on 15 September and 16 October are shown in <bold>(c)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>, <bold>(g)</bold>, and <bold>(h)</bold>. The CALIOP footprints in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> are shown in <bold>(c)</bold>, and the CALIOP footprints in <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> are shown in <bold>(g)</bold>, with the green lines highlighting the occurrence of smoke plumes. The crosses mark the location of Wuhan.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f14.png"/>

      </fig>

</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title/>
      <p id="d1e4212">In mid-October 2020, a series of smoke plumes formed from wildfires in California (Safford et al., 2022; Mamouri et al., 2023). The smoke layer that appeared over Wuhan on 8–9 November originated from a thin smoke plume at altitudes of 12.5–14.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Mediterranean Sea on 27 October (see white rectangle in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F15"/>a). Several plumes were also observed at altitudes of 5–14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown by UVAI data. The thin smoke plume in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F15"/>a can be further tracked back to the wildfire region in the northwest of America on 19 October, which is highly consistent with the HYSPLIT trajectories presented by Mamouri et al. (2023).</p><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F15"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d1e4237"><bold>(a)</bold> CALIOP-observed 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total attenuated backscatter coefficients on 27 October. <bold>(b)</bold> The UVAI measured by OMPS on 27 October 2020. The 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> backward trajectory starting from Wuhan at 16.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 8 September and the 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> backward trajectory starting from 40.83° N, 26.36° E at 13.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 27 October are presented  in <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>. The CALIOP footprints in <bold>(a)</bold> are shown in <bold>(b)</bold>, with the green lines highlighting the occurrence of smoke plumes. The crosses mark the location of Wuhan.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/11431/2024/acp-24-11431-2024-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4310">CALIOP data can be obtained from <uri>https://subset.larc.nasa.gov/</uri> (CALIPSO, 2024). OMPS data can be obtained from <uri>https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/sensors/omps</uri> (OMPS, 2024). Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reanalysis data can be obtained from <uri>https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/cams-global-reanalysis</uri> (CAMS, 2024). The HYSPLIT model is available at <uri>https://www.arl.noaa.gov</uri> (HYSPLIT, 2024). Lidar data used to generate the results of this paper are available from the authors upon request (e-mail: yf@whu.edu.cn).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4328">YH, DJ, and ZY analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. ZY and KO participated in scientific discussions and reviewed and proofread the manuscript. YH and FY conceived the research and acquired the research funding. FY led the study.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4334">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4340">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4348">The authors thank the colleagues who participated in the operation of the lidar system at our site. We also acknowledge the Atmospheric Science Data Central (ASDC) at the NASA Langley Research Center for providing the CALIPSO data, NASA/NOAA for the OMPS data, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service ozone reanalysis data, and the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the HYSPLIT model.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4353">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42005101, 41927804, and 42205130), the China Scholarship Council (grant no. 202206275006), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (grant no. 2023AFB617).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4359">This paper was edited by Matthias Tesche and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abalos, M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Randel, W. J., and Serrano, E.: Ozone seasonality above the tropical tropopause: reconciling the Eulerian and Lagrangian perspectives of transport processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10787–10794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10787-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10787-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Ansmann, A., Baars, H., Chudnovsky, A., Mattis, I., Veselovskii, I., Haarig, M., Seifert, P., Engelmann, R., and Wandinger, U.: Extreme levels of Canadian wildfire smoke in the stratosphere over central Europe on 21–22 August 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11831–11845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11831-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11831-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Ansmann, A., Ohneiser, K., Chudnovsky, A., Baars, H., and Engelmann, R.: CALIPSO aerosol-typing scheme misclassified stratospheric fire smoke: case study from the 2019 Siberian wildfire season, Front. Environ. Sci., 9, 769852 <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.769852" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fenvs.2021.769852</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Ansmann, A., Ohneiser, K., Chudnovsky, A., Knopf, D. A., Eloranta, E. W., Villanueva, D., Seifert, P., Radenz, M., Barja, B., Zamorano, F., Jimenez, C., Engelmann, R., Baars, H., Griesche, H., Hofer, J., Althausen, D., and Wandinger, U.: Ozone depletion in the Arctic and Antarctic stratosphere induced by wildfire smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11701–11726, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11701-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-11701-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Ansmann, A., Veselovskii, I., Ohneiser, K., and Chudnovsky, A.: Comment on “stratospheric aerosol composition observed by the atmospheric chemistry experiment following the 2019 Raikoke eruption” by Boone et al., J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2022JD038080, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038080" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD038080</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Baars, H., Kanitz, T., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Heese, B., Komppula, M., Preißler, J., Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Lim, J.-H., Ahn, J. Y., Stachlewska, I. S., Amiridis, V., Marinou, E., Seifert, P., Hofer, J., Skupin, A., Schneider, F., Bohlmann, S., Foth, A., Bley, S., Pfüller, A., Giannakaki, E., Lihavainen, H., Viisanen, Y., Hooda, R. K., Pereira, S. N., Bortoli, D., Wagner, F., Mattis, I., Janicka, L., Markowicz, K. M., Achtert, P., Artaxo, P., Pauliquevis, T., Souza, R. A. F., Sharma, V. P., van Zyl, P. G., Beukes, J. P., Sun, J., Rohwer, E. G., Deng, R., Mamouri, R.-E., and Zamorano, F.: An overview of the first decade of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Polly</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NET</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5111–5137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5111-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5111-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Ohneiser, K., Haarig, M., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Hanssen, I., Gausa, M., Pietruczuk, A., Szkop, A., Stachlewska, I. S., Wang, D., Reichardt, J., Skupin, A., Mattis, I., Trickl, T., Vogelmann, H., Navas-Guzmán, F., Haefele, A., Acheson, K., Ruth, A. A., Tatarov, B., Müller, D., Hu, Q., Podvin, T., Goloub, P., Veselovskii, I., Pietras, C., Haeffelin, M., Fréville, P., Sicard, M., Comerón, A., Fernández García, A. J., Molero Menéndez, F., Córdoba-Jabonero, C., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Alados-Arboledas, L., Bortoli, D., Costa, M. J., Dionisi, D., Liberti, G. L., Wang, X., Sannino, A., Papagiannopoulos, N., Boselli, A., Mona, L., D'Amico, G., Romano, S., Perrone, M. R., Belegante, L., Nicolae, D., Grigorov, I., Gialitaki, A., Amiridis, V., Soupiona, O., Papayannis, A., Mamouri, R.-E., Nisantzi, A., Heese, B., Hofer, J., Schechner, Y. Y., Wandinger, U., and Pappalardo, G.: The unprecedented 2017–2018 stratospheric smoke event: decay phase and aerosol properties observed with the EARLINET, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15183–15198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15183-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-15183-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Baker, A. K., Schuck, T. J., Slemr, F., van Velthoven, P., Zahn, A., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: Characterization of non-methane hydrocarbons in Asian summer monsoon outflow observed by the CARIBIC aircraft, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 503–518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-503-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-503-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bingen, C., Robert, C. E., Stebel, K., Brühl, C., Schallock, J., Vanhellemont, F., Mateshvili, N., Höpfner, M., Trickl, T., Barnes, J. E., Jumelet, J., Vernier, J.-P., Popp, T., De Leeuw, G., and Pinnock, S.: Stratospheric aerosol data records for the climate change initiative: Development, validation and application to chemistry-climate modelling, Remote Sens. Environ., 203, 296–321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bucholtz, A.: Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial atmosphere, Appl. Optics, 34, 2765–2773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.34.002765</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>CALIPSO: Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infared Pathfinder Satellite Observation data base, EarthData [data set], <uri>https://subset.larc.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 24 May 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>CAMS: Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reanalysis data, ECMWF [data set], <uri>https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/cams-global-reanalysis</uri> (last access: 24 May 2024).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>China, S., Scarnato, B., Owen, R. C., Zhang, B., Ampadu, M. T., Kumar, S., Dzepina, K., Dziobak, M. P., Fialho, P., Perlinger, J. A., Hueber, J., Helmig, D., Mazzoleni, L. R., and Mazzoleni, C.: Morphology and mixing state of aged soot particles at a remote marine free troposphere site: Implications for optical properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1243–1250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062404</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Chouza, F., Leblanc, T., Barnes, J., Brewer, M., Wang, P., and Koon, D.: Long-term (1999–2019) variability of stratospheric aerosol over Mauna Loa, Hawaii, as seen by two co-located lidars and satellite measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6821–6839, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6821-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-6821-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Clemesha, B. R., Batista, P. P., and Simonich, D. M.: Long-term and solar cycle changes in the atmospheric sodium layer, J. Atmos. Sol-Terr. Phy., 59, 1673–1678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(96)00166-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1364-6826(96)00166-6</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Das, S., Colarco, P. R., Oman, L. D., Taha, G., and Torres, O.: The long-term transport and radiative impacts of the 2017 British Columbia pyrocumulonimbus smoke aerosols in the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12069–12090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12069-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-12069-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Deshler, T., Anderson-Sprecher, R., Jager, H., Barnes, J., Hofmann, D. J., Clemesha, B., Simonich, D., Osborn, M., Grainger, R. G., and Godin-Beekmann, S.: Trends in the nonvolcanic component of stratospheric aerosol over the period 1971–2004, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D01201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006089</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. and Rolph, G.: HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model, Air Resources Laboratory, NOAA, Silver Spring, Md, USA, <uri>https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</uri> (last access: 10 October 2024), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fernald, F. G.: Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments, Appl. Optics, 23, 652–653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.000652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.23.000652</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Freudenthaler, V., Esselborn, M., Wiegner, M., Heese, B., Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., Althausen, D., Wirth, M., Fix, A., Ehret, G., Knippertz, P., Toledano, C., Gasteiger, J., Garhammer, M., and Seefeldner, M.: Depolarization ratio profiling at several wavelengths in pure Saharan dust during SAMUM2006, Tellus B, 61, 165–179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00396.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00396.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Garny, H. and Randel, W. J.: Transport pathways from the Asian monsoon anticyclone to the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2703–2718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Gorkavyi, N., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Lait, L., Colarco, P., Carn, S., DeLand, M., Newman, P., Schoeberl, M., Taha, G., Torres, O., Vasilkov, A., and Joiner, J.: Tracking aerosols and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> clouds from the Raikoke eruption: 3D view from satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7545–7563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gorshelev, V., Serdyuchenko, A., Weber, M., Chehade, W., and Burrows, J. P.: High spectral resolution ozone absorption cross-sections – Part 1: Measurements, data analysis and comparison with previous measurements around 293 K, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 609–624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-609-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-609-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Haarig, M., Ansmann, A., Baars, H., Jimenez, C., Veselovskii, I., Engelmann, R., and Althausen, D.: Depolarization and lidar ratios at 355, 532, and 1064 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and microphysical properties of aged tropospheric and stratospheric Canadian wildfire smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11847–11861, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11847-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11847-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hansen, J., Sato, M. K. I., Ruedy, R., Nazarenko, L., Lacis, A., Schmidt, G. A., Russell, G., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Bell, N., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Chandler, M., Cheng, Y., Del Genio, A., Faluvegi, G., Fleming, E., Friend, A., Hall, T., Jackman, C., Kelley, M., Kiang, N., Koch, D., Lean, J., Lerner, J., Lo, S. Menon, K., Miller, R., Minnis, P., Novakov, T., Oinas, V., Perlwitz, Ja., Perlwitz, Ju., Rind, D., Romanou, A., Shindell, D., Stone, P., Sun, S., Tausnev, D. Thresher, N., Wielicki, B., Wong, T., Yao, M., Zhang, S.: Efficacy of climate forcings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D18104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005776" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD005776</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>He, Y. and Yi, F.: Dust aerosols detected using a ground-based polarization lidar and CALIPSO over Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E), China, Adv. Meteorol., 2015, 536762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/536762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2015/536762</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>He, Y., Yi, F., Yi, Y., Liu, F., and Zhang, Y.: Heterogeneous nucleation of midlevel cloud layer influenced by transported Asian dust over Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E), China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033394, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033394" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033394</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>He, Y., Yi, F., Yin, Z., Liu, F., Yi, Y., and Zhou, J.: Mega Asian dust event over China on 27–31 March 2021 observed with space-borne instruments and ground-based polarization lidar, Atmos. Environ., 285, 119238, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119238" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119238</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Heinold, B., Baars, H., Barja, B., Christensen, M., Kubin, A., Ohneiser, K., Schepanski, K., Schutgens, N., Senf, F., Schrödner, R., Villanueva, D., and Tegen, I.: Important role of stratospheric injection height for the distribution and radiative forcing of smoke aerosol from the 2019–2020 Australian wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9969–9985, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9969-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-9969-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hitchman, M. H., McKay, M., and Trepte, C. R.: A climatology of stratospheric aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 20689–20700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD01525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JD01525</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hofer, J., Seifert, P., Liley, J. B., Radenz, M., Uchino, O., Morino, I., Sakai, T., Nagai, T., and Ansmann, A.: Aerosol-related effects on the occurrence of heterogeneous ice formation over Lauder, New Zealand/Aotearoa, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1265–1280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1265-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-1265-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hofmann, D. J. and Solomon, S.: Ozone destruction through heterogeneous chemistry following the eruption of El Chichon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 94, 5029–5041, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD04p05029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD094iD04p05029</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hofmann, D., Barnes, J., O'Neill, M., Trudeau, M., and Neely, R.: Increase in background stratospheric aerosol observed with lidar at Mauna Loa Observatory and Boulder, Colorado, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L15808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL039008</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Veselovskii, I., Bravo-Aranda, J.-A., Popovici, I. E., Podvin, T., Haeffelin, M., Lopatin, A., Dubovik, O., Pietras, C., Huang, X., Torres, B., and Chen, C.: Long-range-transported Canadian smoke plumes in the lower stratosphere over northern France, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1173–1193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1173-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-1173-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>HYSPLIT: Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory, NOAA [data set], <uri>https://www.arl.noaa.gov/</uri> (last access: 20 May 2024).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> Jäger, H. and Wege, K.: Stratospheric ozone depletion at northern midlatitudes after major volcanic eruptions, J. Atmos. Chem., 10, 273–287, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Jaross, G., Bhartia, P. K., Chen, G., Kowitt, M., Haken, M., Chen, Z., Xu P., Warner, J., and Kelly, T.: OMPS Limb Profiler instrument performance assessment. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4399–4412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020482" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020482</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Liu, F., Yi, Y., and Yi, F.: Evolution of aerosol plumes from 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption observed with polarization lidar over central China, Atmos. Environ., 309, 119880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119880</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Junge, C. E.: Sulfur in the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 65, 227–237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ065i001p00227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JZ065i001p00227</ext-link>, 1960.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Junge, C. E. and Manson, J. E.: Stratospheric aerosol studies, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 2163–2182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i007p02163" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JZ066i007p02163</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kafle, D. N. and Coulter, R. L.: Micropulse lidar-derived aerosol optical depth climatology at ARM sites worldwide, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7293–7308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50536" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50536</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M.: Description of the NMC global data assimilation and forecast system, Weather Forecast., 4, 335–342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Kar, J., Lee, K.-P., Vaughan, M. A., Tackett, J. L., Trepte, C. R., Winker, D. M., Lucker, P. L., and Getzewich, B. J.: CALIPSO level 3 stratospheric aerosol profile product: version 1.00 algorithm description and initial assessment, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6173–6191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6173-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-6173-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Khaykin, S. M., Godin-Beekmann, S., Keckhut, P., Hauchecorne, A., Jumelet, J., Vernier, J.-P., Bourassa, A., Degenstein, D. A., Rieger, L. A., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Robert, C., DeLand, M., and Bhartia, P. K.: Variability and evolution of the midlatitude stratospheric aerosol budget from 22 years of ground-based lidar and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1829–1845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1829-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1829-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Khaykin, S. M., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hauchecorne, A., Pelon, J., Ravetta, F., and Keckhut, P.: Stratospheric smoke with unprecedentedly high backscatter observed by lidars above southern France, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1639–1646, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076763" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076763</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Kloss, C., Berthet, G., Sellitto, P., Ploeger, F., Bucci, S., Khaykin, S., Jégou, F., Taha, G., Thomason, L. W., Barret, B., Le Flochmoen, E., von Hobe, M., Bossolasco, A., Bègue, N., and Legras, B.: Transport of the 2017 Canadian wildfire plume to the tropics via the Asian monsoon circulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13547–13567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13547-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13547-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Kloss, C., Berthet, G., Sellitto, P., Ploeger, F., Taha, G., Tidiga, M., Eremenko, M., Bossolasco, A., Jégou, F., Renard, J.-B., and Legras, B.: Stratospheric aerosol layer perturbation caused by the 2019 Raikoke and Ulawun eruptions and their radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 535–560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-535-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Koch, D.: Transport and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in the GISS GCM, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 20311–20332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD900038</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Kong, W. and Yi, F.: Convective boundary layer evolution from lidar backscatter and its relationship with surface aerosol concentration at a location of a central China megacity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7928–7940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023248</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R., Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E., Antu na-Marrero, J., Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J., Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C., Klocke, D., Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D., Rieger, L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric aerosol—Observations, processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54, 278–335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015RG000511</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Lee, J., Hsu, N. C., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A. M., Seftor, C. J., and Jeong, M. J.: Retrieving the height of smoke and dust aerosols by synergistic use of VIIRS, OMPS, and CALIOP observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8372–8388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023567" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023567</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Lestrelin, H., Legras, B., Podglajen, A., and Salihoglu, M.: Smoke-charged vortices in the stratosphere generated by wildfires and their behaviour in both hemispheres: comparing Australia 2020 to Canada 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7113–7134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7113-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-7113-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Mamouri, R. E., Ansmann, A., Nisantzi, A., Kokkalis, P., Schwarz, A., and Hadjimitsis, D.: Low Arabian extinction-to-backscatter ratio, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4762–4766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50898" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50898</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Mamouri, R.-E., Ansmann, A., Ohneiser, K., Knopf, D. A., Nisantzi, A., Bühl, J., Engelmann, R., Skupin, A., Seifert, P., Baars, H., Ene, D., Wandinger, U., and Hadjimitsis, D.: Wildfire smoke triggers cirrus formation: lidar observations over the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14097–14114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14097-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-14097-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Mari, C., Jacob, D. J., and Bechtold, P.: Transport and scavenging of soluble gases in a deep convective cloud, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 22255–22267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900211</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Newhall, C. G. and Self, S.: The volcanic explosivity index (VEI) an estimate of explosive magnitude for historical volcanism, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 1231–1238, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/jc087ic02p01231" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/jc087ic02p01231</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Niwano, M., Hayashida, S., Akiyoshi, H., and Takahashi, M.: Seasonal cycles of Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II near-background aerosol in the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D14306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009842" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009842</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Ohneiser, K., Ansmann, A., Baars, H., Seifert, P., Barja, B., Jimenez, C., Radenz, M., Teisseire, A., Floutsi, A., Haarig, M., Foth, A., Chudnovsky, A., Engelmann, R., Zamorano, F., Bühl, J., and Wandinger, U.: Smoke of extreme Australian bushfires observed in the stratosphere over Punta Arenas, Chile, in January 2020: optical thickness, lidar ratios, and depolarization ratios at 355 and 532 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8003–8015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8003-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-8003-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Ohneiser, K., Ansmann, A., Chudnovsky, A., Engelmann, R., Ritter, C., Veselovskii, I., Baars, H., Gebauer, H., Griesche, H., Radenz, M., Hofer, J., Althausen, D., Dahlke, S., and Maturilli, M.: The unexpected smoke layer in the High Arctic winter stratosphere during MOSAiC 2019–2020 , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15783–15808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Ohneiser, K., Ansmann, A., Kaifler, B., Chudnovsky, A., Barja, B., Knopf, D. A., Kaifler, N., Baars, H., Seifert, P., Villanueva, D., Jimenez, C., Radenz, M., Engelmann, R., Veselovskii, I., and Zamorano, F.: Australian wildfire smoke in the stratosphere: the decay phase in 2020/2021 and impact on ozone depletion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7417–7442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7417-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-7417-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>OMPS: Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite, EarthData [data set], <uri>https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/sensors/omps/</uri> (last access: 6 May 2024).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Penning de Vries, M. J. M., Beirle, S., and Wagner, T.: UV Aerosol Indices from SCIAMACHY: introducing the SCattering Index (SCI), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9555–9567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9555-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-9555-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Peterson, D. A., Campbell, J., Hyer, E., Fromm, M., Kablick, G., Cossuth, J., and DeLand, M.: Wildfire-driven thunderstorms cause a volcano-like stratospheric injection of smoke, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Randel, W. J., Park, M., Emmons, L., Kinnison, D., Bernath, P., Walker, K. A., Boone, C., and Pumphrey, H.: Asian monsoon transport of pollution to the stratosphere, Science, 328, 611–613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182274" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1182274</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Safford, H. D., Paulson, A. K., Steel, Z. L., Young, D. J. N., and Wayman, R. B.: The 2020 California fire season: A year like no other, a return to the past or a harbinger of the future?, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 31, 2005–2025, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13498" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/geb.13498</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Sakai, T., Uchino, O., Nagai, T., Liley, B., Morino, I., and Fujimoto, T.: Long-term variation of stratospheric aerosols observed with lidars over Tsukuba, Japan, from 1982 and Lauder, New Zealand, from 1992 to 2015, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 10283–10293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025132</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Shang, X., Mielonen, T., Lipponen, A., Giannakaki, E., Leskinen, A., Buchard, V., Darmenov, A. S., Kukkurainen, A., Arola, A., O'Connor, E., Hirsikko, A., and Komppula, M.: Mass concentration estimates of long-range-transported Canadian biomass burning aerosols from a multi-wavelength Raman polarization lidar and a ceilometer in Finland, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6159–6179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6159-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-6159-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Sicard, M., Granados-Mu noz, M. J., Alados-Arboledas, L., Barragán, R., Bedoya-Velásquez, A. E., Benavent-Oltra, J. A., Bortoli, D., Comerón, A., Córdoba-Jabonero, C., Costa, M. J., del Águila, A., Fernández, A. J., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Jorba, O., Molero, F., Mu noz-Porcar, C., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Papagiannopoulos, N., Potes, M., Pujadas, M., Rocadenbosch, F., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., Román, R., Salgado, R., Salgueiro, V., Sola, Y., and Yela, M.: Ground/space, passive/active remote sensing observations coupled with particle dispersion modelling to understand the inter-continental transport of wildfire smoke plumes, Remote Sens. Environ., 232, 111294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2019.111294</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely III, R. R., Vernier, J. P., Dutton, E. G., and Thomason, L. W.: The persistently variable “background” stratospheric aerosol layer and global climate change, Science, 333, 866–870, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1206027</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Tao, M., Chen, L., Wang, J., Wang, L., Wang, W., Lin, C., Gui, L., Wang, L., Yu, C., and Wang, Y.: Characterization of dust activation and their prevailing transport over East Asia based on multi-satellite observations, Atmos. Res., 265, 105886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105886" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105886</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, D. W. and Solomon, S.: Understanding recent stratospheric climate change, J. Climate, 22, 1934–1943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2482.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008JCLI2482.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Torres, O., Bhartia, P. K., Taha, G., Jethva, H., Das, S., Colarco, P., Krotkov, N., Omar, A., and Ahn, C.: Stratospheric injection of massive smoke plume from Canadian boreal fires in 2017 as seen by DSCOVR-EPIC, CALIOP, and OMPS-LP oobservations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD032579</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Trickl, T., Giehl, H., Jäger, H., and Vogelmann, H.: 35 yr of stratospheric aerosol measurements at Garmisch-Partenkirchen: from Fuego to Eyjafjallajökull, and beyond, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5205–5225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5205-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5205-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Trickl, T., Vogelmann, H., Fromm, M. D., Jäger, H., Perfahl, M., and Steinbrecht, W.: Measurement report: Violent biomass burning and volcanic eruptions – a new period of elevated stratospheric aerosol over central Europe (2017 to 2023) in a long series of observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1997–2021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1997-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-1997-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Vaughan, G., Wareing, D., and Ricketts, H.: Measurement Report: Lidar measurements of stratospheric aerosol following the 2019 Raikoke and Ulawun volcanic eruptions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5597–5604, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5597-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-5597-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Vernier, J. P., Thomason, L. W., Pommereau, J. P., Bourassa, A., Pelon, J., Garnier, A., Hauchecorne, A., Blanot, L., Trepte, C., Degenstein, D., and Vargas, F.: Major influence of tropical volcanic eruptions on the stratospheric aerosol layer during the last decade, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L12807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047563</ext-link>, 2011. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J., Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.: Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and its potential connection with Asian pollution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 1608–1619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022372</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Veselovskii, I., Kasianik, N., Korenskii, M., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Podvin, T., and Liu, D.: Multiwavelength fluorescence lidar observations of smoke plumes, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2055–2065, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2055-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-16-2055-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Winker, D., Hunt, W., and McGill, M.: Initial performance assessment of CALIOP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030135</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Woods, D. C., Osborn, M. T., and Lucker, P. L.: Lidar monitoring of stratospheric aerosols at Hampton, Virginia, in: Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere VII, Vol. 4882, International Symposium on Remote Sensing, Crete, Greece, 24–27 September 2002, SPIE, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.463021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/12.463021</ext-link>, 474–480, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Yi, Y., Yi, F., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and He, Y.: Microphysical process of precipitating hydrometeors from warm-front mid-level stratiform clouds revealed by ground-based lidar observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17649–17664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17649-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-17649-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Yin, Z., Yi, F., Liu, F., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and Zhang, Y.: Long-term variations of aerosol optical properties over Wuhan with polarization lidar, Atmos. Environ., 259, 118508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118508</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Yu, P., Toon, O. B., Neely, R. R., Martinsson, B. G., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A.: Composition and physical properties of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer and the North American tropospheric aerosol layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 2540–2546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063181" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063181</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Liu, S., Telg, H., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Portmann, R. W., Bai, Z., Ray, E. A., Duan, Y., Pan, L. L., Toon, O. B., Bian, J and Gao, R. S.: Efficient transport of tropospheric aerosol into the stratosphere via the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 6972–6977, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701170114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1701170114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Zhuang, J. and Yi, F.: Nabro aerosol evolution observed jointly by lidars at a midlatitude site and CALIPSO, Atmos. Environ., 140, 106–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.048</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zuev, V. V., Burlakov, V. D., Nevzorov, A. V., Pravdin, V. L., Savelieva, E. S., and Gerasimov, V. V.: 30-year lidar observations of the stratospheric aerosol layer state over Tomsk (Western Siberia, Russia), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3067–3081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3067-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3067-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Long-term (2010–2021) lidar observations of stratospheric aerosols in Wuhan, China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abalos, M., Ploeger, F., Konopka, P., Randel, W. J., and Serrano, E.:
Ozone seasonality above the tropical tropopause: reconciling the Eulerian and Lagrangian perspectives of transport processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10787–10794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10787-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10787-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ansmann, A., Baars, H., Chudnovsky, A., Mattis, I., Veselovskii, I., Haarig, M., Seifert, P., Engelmann, R., and Wandinger, U.:
Extreme levels of Canadian wildfire smoke in the stratosphere over central Europe on 21–22 August 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11831–11845, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11831-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11831-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ansmann, A., Ohneiser, K., Chudnovsky, A., Baars, H., and Engelmann, R.:
CALIPSO aerosol-typing scheme misclassified stratospheric fire smoke: case study from the 2019 Siberian wildfire season, Front. Environ. Sci., 9, 769852 <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.769852" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.769852</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ansmann, A., Ohneiser, K., Chudnovsky, A., Knopf, D. A., Eloranta, E. W., Villanueva, D., Seifert, P., Radenz, M., Barja, B., Zamorano, F., Jimenez, C., Engelmann, R., Baars, H., Griesche, H., Hofer, J., Althausen, D., and Wandinger, U.:
Ozone depletion in the Arctic and Antarctic stratosphere induced by wildfire smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11701–11726, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11701-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11701-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ansmann, A., Veselovskii, I., Ohneiser, K., and Chudnovsky, A.:
Comment on “stratospheric aerosol composition observed by the atmospheric chemistry experiment following the 2019 Raikoke eruption” by Boone et al., J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2022JD038080, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038080" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038080</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baars, H., Kanitz, T., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Heese, B., Komppula, M., Preißler, J., Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Lim, J.-H., Ahn, J. Y., Stachlewska, I. S., Amiridis, V., Marinou, E., Seifert, P., Hofer, J., Skupin, A., Schneider, F., Bohlmann, S., Foth, A., Bley, S., Pfüller, A., Giannakaki, E., Lihavainen, H., Viisanen, Y., Hooda, R. K., Pereira, S. N., Bortoli, D., Wagner, F., Mattis, I., Janicka, L., Markowicz, K. M., Achtert, P., Artaxo, P., Pauliquevis, T., Souza, R. A. F., Sharma, V. P., van Zyl, P. G., Beukes, J. P., Sun, J., Rohwer, E. G., Deng, R., Mamouri, R.-E., and Zamorano, F.:
An overview of the first decade of Polly<sup>NET</sup>: an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5111–5137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5111-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5111-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Ohneiser, K., Haarig, M., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Hanssen, I., Gausa, M., Pietruczuk, A., Szkop, A., Stachlewska, I. S., Wang, D., Reichardt, J., Skupin, A., Mattis, I., Trickl, T., Vogelmann, H., Navas-Guzmán, F., Haefele, A., Acheson, K., Ruth, A. A., Tatarov, B., Müller, D., Hu, Q., Podvin, T., Goloub, P., Veselovskii, I., Pietras, C., Haeffelin, M., Fréville, P., Sicard, M., Comerón, A., Fernández García, A. J., Molero Menéndez, F., Córdoba-Jabonero, C., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Alados-Arboledas, L., Bortoli, D., Costa, M. J., Dionisi, D., Liberti, G. L., Wang, X., Sannino, A., Papagiannopoulos, N., Boselli, A., Mona, L., D'Amico, G., Romano, S., Perrone, M. R., Belegante, L., Nicolae, D., Grigorov, I., Gialitaki, A., Amiridis, V., Soupiona, O., Papayannis, A., Mamouri, R.-E., Nisantzi, A., Heese, B., Hofer, J., Schechner, Y. Y., Wandinger, U., and Pappalardo, G.:
The unprecedented 2017–2018 stratospheric smoke event: decay phase and aerosol properties observed with the EARLINET, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15183–15198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15183-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15183-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baker, A. K., Schuck, T. J., Slemr, F., van Velthoven, P., Zahn, A., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: Characterization of non-methane hydrocarbons in Asian summer monsoon outflow observed by the CARIBIC aircraft, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 503–518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-503-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-503-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bingen, C., Robert, C. E., Stebel, K., Brühl, C., Schallock, J., Vanhellemont, F., Mateshvili, N., Höpfner, M., Trickl, T., Barnes, J. E., Jumelet, J., Vernier, J.-P., Popp, T., De Leeuw, G., and Pinnock, S.:
Stratospheric aerosol data records for the climate change initiative: Development, validation and application to chemistry-climate modelling, Remote Sens. Environ., 203, 296–321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.002</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bucholtz, A.:
Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial atmosphere, Appl. Optics, 34, 2765–2773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002765" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002765</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
CALIPSO:
Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infared Pathfinder Satellite Observation data base, EarthData [data set], <a href="https://subset.larc.nasa.gov/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 24 May 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
CAMS:
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reanalysis data, ECMWF [data set], <a href="https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/cams-global-reanalysis" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 May 2024).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
China, S., Scarnato, B., Owen, R. C., Zhang, B., Ampadu, M. T., Kumar, S., Dzepina, K., Dziobak, M. P., Fialho, P., Perlinger, J. A., Hueber, J., Helmig, D., Mazzoleni, L. R., and Mazzoleni, C.:
Morphology and mixing state of aged soot particles at a remote marine free troposphere site: Implications for optical properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1243–1250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062404" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062404</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chouza, F., Leblanc, T., Barnes, J., Brewer, M., Wang, P., and Koon, D.:
Long-term (1999–2019) variability of stratospheric aerosol over Mauna Loa, Hawaii, as seen by two co-located lidars and satellite measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6821–6839, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6821-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6821-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clemesha, B. R., Batista, P. P., and Simonich, D. M.:
Long-term and solar cycle changes in the atmospheric sodium layer, J. Atmos. Sol-Terr. Phy., 59, 1673–1678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(96)00166-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(96)00166-6</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Das, S., Colarco, P. R., Oman, L. D., Taha, G., and Torres, O.:
The long-term transport and radiative impacts of the 2017 British Columbia pyrocumulonimbus smoke aerosols in the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12069–12090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12069-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12069-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deshler, T., Anderson-Sprecher, R., Jager, H., Barnes, J., Hofmann, D. J., Clemesha, B., Simonich, D., Osborn, M., Grainger, R. G., and Godin-Beekmann, S.:
Trends in the nonvolcanic component of stratospheric aerosol over the period 1971–2004, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D01201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006089</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Draxler, R. and Rolph, G.:
HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model, Air Resources Laboratory, NOAA, Silver Spring, Md, USA, <a href="https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 October 2024), 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fernald, F. G.:
Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments, Appl. Optics, 23, 652–653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.000652" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.000652</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Freudenthaler, V., Esselborn, M., Wiegner, M., Heese, B., Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., Althausen, D., Wirth, M., Fix, A., Ehret, G., Knippertz, P., Toledano, C., Gasteiger, J., Garhammer, M., and Seefeldner, M.:
Depolarization ratio profiling at several wavelengths in pure Saharan dust during SAMUM2006, Tellus B, 61, 165–179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00396.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00396.x</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garny, H. and Randel, W. J.:
Transport pathways from the Asian monsoon anticyclone to the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2703–2718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2703-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gorkavyi, N., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Lait, L., Colarco, P., Carn, S., DeLand, M., Newman, P., Schoeberl, M., Taha, G., Torres, O., Vasilkov, A., and Joiner, J.:
Tracking aerosols and SO<sub>2</sub> clouds from the Raikoke eruption: 3D view from satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7545–7563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7545-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gorshelev, V., Serdyuchenko, A., Weber, M., Chehade, W., and Burrows, J. P.:
High spectral resolution ozone absorption cross-sections – Part 1: Measurements, data analysis and comparison with previous measurements around 293 K, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 609–624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-609-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-609-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haarig, M., Ansmann, A., Baars, H., Jimenez, C., Veselovskii, I., Engelmann, R., and Althausen, D.:
Depolarization and lidar ratios at 355, 532, and 1064&thinsp;nm and microphysical properties of aged tropospheric and stratospheric Canadian wildfire smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11847–11861, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11847-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11847-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hansen, J., Sato, M. K. I., Ruedy, R., Nazarenko, L., Lacis, A., Schmidt, G. A., Russell, G., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Bell, N., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Chandler, M., Cheng, Y., Del Genio, A., Faluvegi, G., Fleming, E., Friend, A., Hall, T., Jackman, C., Kelley, M., Kiang, N., Koch, D., Lean, J., Lerner, J., Lo, S. Menon, K., Miller, R., Minnis, P., Novakov, T., Oinas, V., Perlwitz, Ja., Perlwitz, Ju., Rind, D., Romanou, A., Shindell, D., Stone, P., Sun, S., Tausnev, D. Thresher, N., Wielicki, B., Wong, T., Yao, M., Zhang, S.:
Efficacy of climate forcings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D18104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005776" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005776</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Y. and Yi, F.:
Dust aerosols detected using a ground-based polarization lidar and CALIPSO over Wuhan (30.5°&thinsp;N, 114.4°&thinsp;E), China, Adv. Meteorol., 2015, 536762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/536762" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/536762</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Y., Yi, F., Yi, Y., Liu, F., and Zhang, Y.:
Heterogeneous nucleation of midlevel cloud layer influenced by transported Asian dust over Wuhan (30.5°&thinsp;N, 114.4°&thinsp;E), China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033394, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033394" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033394</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Y., Yi, F., Yin, Z., Liu, F., Yi, Y., and Zhou, J.:
Mega Asian dust event over China on 27–31 March 2021 observed with space-borne instruments and ground-based polarization lidar, Atmos. Environ., 285, 119238, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119238" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119238</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heinold, B., Baars, H., Barja, B., Christensen, M., Kubin, A., Ohneiser, K., Schepanski, K., Schutgens, N., Senf, F., Schrödner, R., Villanueva, D., and Tegen, I.:
Important role of stratospheric injection height for the distribution and radiative forcing of smoke aerosol from the 2019–2020 Australian wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9969–9985, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9969-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9969-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hitchman, M. H., McKay, M., and Trepte, C. R.:
A climatology of stratospheric aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 20689–20700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD01525" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD01525</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hofer, J., Seifert, P., Liley, J. B., Radenz, M., Uchino, O., Morino, I., Sakai, T., Nagai, T., and Ansmann, A.:
Aerosol-related effects on the occurrence of heterogeneous ice formation over Lauder, New Zealand/Aotearoa, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1265–1280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1265-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1265-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hofmann, D. J. and Solomon, S.:
Ozone destruction through heterogeneous chemistry following the eruption of El Chichon, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 94, 5029–5041, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD04p05029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD04p05029</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hofmann, D., Barnes, J., O'Neill, M., Trudeau, M., and Neely, R.:
Increase in background stratospheric aerosol observed with lidar at Mauna Loa Observatory and Boulder, Colorado, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L15808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039008</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Veselovskii, I., Bravo-Aranda, J.-A., Popovici, I. E., Podvin, T., Haeffelin, M., Lopatin, A., Dubovik, O., Pietras, C., Huang, X., Torres, B., and Chen, C.:
Long-range-transported Canadian smoke plumes in the lower stratosphere over northern France, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1173–1193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1173-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1173-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
HYSPLIT:
Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory, NOAA [data set], <a href="https://www.arl.noaa.gov/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 May 2024).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jäger, H. and Wege, K.:
Stratospheric ozone depletion at northern midlatitudes after major volcanic eruptions, J. Atmos. Chem., 10, 273–287, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jaross, G., Bhartia, P. K., Chen, G., Kowitt, M., Haken, M., Chen, Z., Xu P., Warner, J., and Kelly, T.:
OMPS Limb Profiler instrument performance assessment. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4399–4412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020482" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020482</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Liu, F., Yi, Y., and Yi, F.:
Evolution of aerosol plumes from 2019 Raikoke volcanic eruption observed with polarization lidar over central China, Atmos. Environ., 309, 119880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119880</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Junge, C. E.:
Sulfur in the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 65, 227–237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ065i001p00227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ065i001p00227</a>, 1960.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Junge, C. E. and Manson, J. E.:
Stratospheric aerosol studies, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 2163–2182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i007p02163" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i007p02163</a>, 1961.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kafle, D. N. and Coulter, R. L.:
Micropulse lidar-derived aerosol optical depth climatology at ARM sites worldwide, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7293–7308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50536" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50536</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kanamitsu, M.:
Description of the NMC global data assimilation and forecast system, Weather Forecast., 4, 335–342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kar, J., Lee, K.-P., Vaughan, M. A., Tackett, J. L., Trepte, C. R., Winker, D. M., Lucker, P. L., and Getzewich, B. J.:
CALIPSO level 3 stratospheric aerosol profile product: version 1.00 algorithm description and initial assessment, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6173–6191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6173-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6173-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khaykin, S. M., Godin-Beekmann, S., Keckhut, P., Hauchecorne, A., Jumelet, J., Vernier, J.-P., Bourassa, A., Degenstein, D. A., Rieger, L. A., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Robert, C., DeLand, M., and Bhartia, P. K.:
Variability and evolution of the midlatitude stratospheric aerosol budget from 22 years of ground-based lidar and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1829–1845, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1829-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1829-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khaykin, S. M., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hauchecorne, A., Pelon, J., Ravetta, F., and Keckhut, P.:
Stratospheric smoke with unprecedentedly high backscatter observed by lidars above southern France, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1639–1646, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076763" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076763</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kloss, C., Berthet, G., Sellitto, P., Ploeger, F., Bucci, S., Khaykin, S., Jégou, F., Taha, G., Thomason, L. W., Barret, B., Le Flochmoen, E., von Hobe, M., Bossolasco, A., Bègue, N., and Legras, B.:
Transport of the 2017 Canadian wildfire plume to the tropics via the Asian monsoon circulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13547–13567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13547-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13547-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kloss, C., Berthet, G., Sellitto, P., Ploeger, F., Taha, G., Tidiga, M., Eremenko, M., Bossolasco, A., Jégou, F., Renard, J.-B., and Legras, B.:
Stratospheric aerosol layer perturbation caused by the 2019 Raikoke and Ulawun eruptions and their radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 535–560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-535-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koch, D.:
Transport and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in the GISS GCM, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 20311–20332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900038</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kong, W. and Yi, F.:
Convective boundary layer evolution from lidar backscatter and its relationship with surface aerosol concentration at a location of a central China megacity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7928–7940, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023248</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T., Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R., Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E., Antu na-Marrero, J., Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J., Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C., Klocke, D., Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D., Rieger, L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.:
Stratospheric aerosol—Observations, processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54, 278–335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000511</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, J., Hsu, N. C., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A. M., Seftor, C. J., and Jeong, M. J.:
Retrieving the height of smoke and dust aerosols by synergistic use of VIIRS, OMPS, and CALIOP observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 8372–8388, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023567" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023567</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lestrelin, H., Legras, B., Podglajen, A., and Salihoglu, M.:
Smoke-charged vortices in the stratosphere generated by wildfires and their behaviour in both hemispheres: comparing Australia 2020 to Canada 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7113–7134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7113-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7113-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mamouri, R. E., Ansmann, A., Nisantzi, A., Kokkalis, P., Schwarz, A., and Hadjimitsis, D.:
Low Arabian extinction-to-backscatter ratio, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4762–4766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50898" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50898</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mamouri, R.-E., Ansmann, A., Ohneiser, K., Knopf, D. A., Nisantzi, A., Bühl, J., Engelmann, R., Skupin, A., Seifert, P., Baars, H., Ene, D., Wandinger, U., and Hadjimitsis, D.:
Wildfire smoke triggers cirrus formation: lidar observations over the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14097–14114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14097-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14097-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mari, C., Jacob, D. J., and Bechtold, P.:
Transport and scavenging of soluble gases in a deep convective cloud, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 22255–22267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900211</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Newhall, C. G. and Self, S.:
The volcanic explosivity index (VEI) an estimate of explosive magnitude for historical volcanism, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 1231–1238, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/jc087ic02p01231" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/jc087ic02p01231</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niwano, M., Hayashida, S., Akiyoshi, H., and Takahashi, M.:
Seasonal cycles of Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II near-background aerosol in the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D14306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009842" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009842</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ohneiser, K., Ansmann, A., Baars, H., Seifert, P., Barja, B., Jimenez, C., Radenz, M., Teisseire, A., Floutsi, A., Haarig, M., Foth, A., Chudnovsky, A., Engelmann, R., Zamorano, F., Bühl, J., and Wandinger, U.:
Smoke of extreme Australian bushfires observed in the stratosphere over Punta Arenas, Chile, in January 2020: optical thickness, lidar ratios, and depolarization ratios at 355 and 532&thinsp;nm, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8003–8015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8003-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8003-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ohneiser, K., Ansmann, A., Chudnovsky, A., Engelmann, R., Ritter, C., Veselovskii, I., Baars, H., Gebauer, H., Griesche, H., Radenz, M., Hofer, J., Althausen, D., Dahlke, S., and Maturilli, M.:
The unexpected smoke layer in the High Arctic winter stratosphere during MOSAiC 2019–2020 , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15783–15808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ohneiser, K., Ansmann, A., Kaifler, B., Chudnovsky, A., Barja, B., Knopf, D. A., Kaifler, N., Baars, H., Seifert, P., Villanueva, D., Jimenez, C., Radenz, M., Engelmann, R., Veselovskii, I., and Zamorano, F.:
Australian wildfire smoke in the stratosphere: the decay phase in 2020/2021 and impact on ozone depletion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7417–7442, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7417-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7417-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
OMPS:
Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite, EarthData [data set], <a href="https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/sensors/omps/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 6 May 2024).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Penning de Vries, M. J. M., Beirle, S., and Wagner, T.:
UV Aerosol Indices from SCIAMACHY: introducing the SCattering Index (SCI), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9555–9567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9555-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9555-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peterson, D. A., Campbell, J., Hyer, E., Fromm, M., Kablick, G., Cossuth, J., and DeLand, M.:
Wildfire-driven thunderstorms cause a volcano-like stratospheric injection of smoke, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Randel, W. J., Park, M., Emmons, L., Kinnison, D., Bernath, P., Walker, K. A., Boone, C., and Pumphrey, H.:
Asian monsoon transport of pollution to the stratosphere, Science, 328, 611–613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182274" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182274</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Safford, H. D., Paulson, A. K., Steel, Z. L., Young, D. J. N., and Wayman, R. B.:
The 2020 California fire season: A year like no other, a return to the past or a harbinger of the future?, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 31, 2005–2025, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13498" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13498</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sakai, T., Uchino, O., Nagai, T., Liley, B., Morino, I., and Fujimoto, T.:
Long-term variation of stratospheric aerosols observed with lidars over Tsukuba, Japan, from 1982 and Lauder, New Zealand, from 1992 to 2015, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 10283–10293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025132</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shang, X., Mielonen, T., Lipponen, A., Giannakaki, E., Leskinen, A., Buchard, V., Darmenov, A. S., Kukkurainen, A., Arola, A., O'Connor, E., Hirsikko, A., and Komppula, M.:
Mass concentration estimates of long-range-transported Canadian biomass burning aerosols from a multi-wavelength Raman polarization lidar and a ceilometer in Finland, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6159–6179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6159-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6159-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sicard, M., Granados-Mu noz, M. J., Alados-Arboledas, L., Barragán, R., Bedoya-Velásquez, A. E., Benavent-Oltra, J. A., Bortoli, D., Comerón, A., Córdoba-Jabonero, C., Costa, M. J., del Águila, A., Fernández, A. J., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Jorba, O., Molero, F., Mu noz-Porcar, C., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Papagiannopoulos, N., Potes, M., Pujadas, M., Rocadenbosch, F., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., Román, R., Salgado, R., Salgueiro, V., Sola, Y., and Yela, M.:
Ground/space, passive/active remote sensing observations coupled with particle dispersion modelling to understand the inter-continental transport of wildfire smoke plumes, Remote Sens. Environ., 232, 111294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111294</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely III, R. R., Vernier, J. P., Dutton, E. G., and Thomason, L. W.:
The persistently variable “background” stratospheric aerosol layer and global climate change, Science, 333, 866–870, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.:
NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, M., Chen, L., Wang, J., Wang, L., Wang, W., Lin, C., Gui, L., Wang, L., Yu, C., and Wang, Y.:
Characterization of dust activation and their prevailing transport over East Asia based on multi-satellite observations, Atmos. Res., 265, 105886, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105886" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105886</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thompson, D. W. and Solomon, S.:
Understanding recent stratospheric climate change, J. Climate, 22, 1934–1943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2482.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2482.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Torres, O., Bhartia, P. K., Taha, G., Jethva, H., Das, S., Colarco, P., Krotkov, N., Omar, A., and Ahn, C.:
Stratospheric injection of massive smoke plume from Canadian boreal fires in 2017 as seen by DSCOVR-EPIC, CALIOP, and OMPS-LP oobservations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032579" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032579</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trickl, T., Giehl, H., Jäger, H., and Vogelmann, H.:
35 yr of stratospheric aerosol measurements at Garmisch-Partenkirchen: from Fuego to Eyjafjallajökull, and beyond, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5205–5225, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5205-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5205-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trickl, T., Vogelmann, H., Fromm, M. D., Jäger, H., Perfahl, M., and Steinbrecht, W.:
Measurement report: Violent biomass burning and volcanic eruptions – a new period of elevated stratospheric aerosol over central Europe (2017 to 2023) in a long series of observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1997–2021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1997-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1997-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vaughan, G., Wareing, D., and Ricketts, H.:
Measurement Report: Lidar measurements of stratospheric aerosol following the 2019 Raikoke and Ulawun volcanic eruptions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5597–5604, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5597-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5597-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vernier, J. P., Thomason, L. W., Pommereau, J. P., Bourassa, A., Pelon, J., Garnier, A., Hauchecorne, A., Blanot, L., Trepte, C., Degenstein, D., and Vargas, F.:
Major influence of tropical volcanic eruptions on the stratospheric aerosol layer during the last decade, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L12807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047563" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047563</a>, 2011.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J., Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.:
Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and its potential connection with Asian pollution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 1608–1619, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veselovskii, I., Kasianik, N., Korenskii, M., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Podvin, T., and Liu, D.:
Multiwavelength fluorescence lidar observations of smoke plumes, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2055–2065, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2055-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2055-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Winker, D., Hunt, W., and McGill, M.:
Initial performance assessment of CALIOP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030135</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woods, D. C., Osborn, M. T., and Lucker, P. L.:
Lidar monitoring of stratospheric aerosols at Hampton, Virginia, in: Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere VII, Vol. 4882, International Symposium on Remote Sensing, Crete, Greece, 24–27 September 2002, SPIE, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.463021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/12.463021</a>, 474–480, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yi, Y., Yi, F., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and He, Y.:
Microphysical process of precipitating hydrometeors from warm-front mid-level stratiform clouds revealed by ground-based lidar observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17649–17664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17649-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17649-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yin, Z., Yi, F., Liu, F., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and Zhang, Y.:
Long-term variations of aerosol optical properties over Wuhan with polarization lidar, Atmos. Environ., 259, 118508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118508" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118508</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, P., Toon, O. B., Neely, R. R., Martinsson, B. G., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A.:
Composition and physical properties of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer and the North American tropospheric aerosol layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 2540–2546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063181" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063181</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, P., Rosenlof, K. H., Liu, S., Telg, H., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Portmann, R. W., Bai, Z., Ray, E. A., Duan, Y., Pan, L. L., Toon, O. B., Bian, J and Gao, R. S.:
Efficient transport of tropospheric aerosol into the stratosphere via the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 6972–6977, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701170114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701170114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhuang, J. and Yi, F.:
Nabro aerosol evolution observed jointly by lidars at a midlatitude site and CALIPSO, Atmos. Environ., 140, 106–116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.048</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zuev, V. V., Burlakov, V. D., Nevzorov, A. V., Pravdin, V. L., Savelieva, E. S., and Gerasimov, V. V.:
30-year lidar observations of the stratospheric aerosol layer state over Tomsk (Western Siberia, Russia), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3067–3081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3067-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3067-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
