<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-23-587-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Investigating the radiative effect of Arctic cirrus measured in situ during the winter 2015–2016</article-title><alt-title>Investigating the radiative effect of Arctic cirrus</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Investigating the radiative effect of Arctic cirrus}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Marsing et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Marsing</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          <email>andreas.marsing@dlr.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-2133</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Meerkötter</surname><given-names>Ralf</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Heller</surname><given-names>Romy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kaufmann</surname><given-names>Stefan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-1996</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jurkat-Witschas</surname><given-names>Tina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Krämer</surname><given-names>Martina</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2888-1722</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Rolf</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-0054</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Voigt</surname><given-names>Christiane</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-7731</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Energy and Climate Research (IEK-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Andreas Marsing (andreas.marsing@dlr.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>587</fpage><lpage>609</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day><month>December</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>December</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e159">The radiative energy budget in the Arctic undergoes a rapid transformation compared with global mean changes. Understanding the role of cirrus clouds in this system is vital, as they interact with short- and long-wave radiation,
and the presence of cirrus can be decisive as to a net gain or loss of radiative energy in the polar atmosphere.</p>

      <p id="d1e162">In an effort to derive the radiative properties of cirrus in a real scenario in this sensitive region, we use in situ measurements of the ice water content (IWC) performed during the Polar Stratosphere in a Changing Climate (POLSTRACC) aircraft campaign in the boreal winter and spring 2015–2016 employing the German High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO). A large dataset of IWC measurements of mostly thin cirrus at high northern latitudes was collected in the upper troposphere and also frequently in the lowermost stratosphere. From this dataset, we select vertical profiles that sampled the complete vertical extent of cirrus cloud layers. These profiles exhibit a vertical IWC structure that will be shown to control the instantaneous radiative effect in both the long and short wavelength regimes in the polar winter.</p>

      <p id="d1e165">We perform radiative transfer calculations with the uvspec model from the libRadtran software package in a one-dimensional column between the surface and the top of the atmosphere (TOA), using the IWC profiles as well as the state of the atmospheric column
at the time of measurement, as given by weather forecast products, as input. In parameter studies, we vary the surface albedo and solar zenith angle in ranges typical of the Arctic region. We find the strongest (positive) radiative forcing up to about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for cirrus over bright snow, whereas the forcing is mostly weaker and even ambiguous, with a rather symmetric range of values down to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, over the open ocean in winter and spring. The
IWC structure over several kilometres in the vertical affects the irradiance at the TOA
via the distribution of optical thickness. We show the extent to which IWC profiles with a coarser vertical resolution can reflect this effect. Further, a highly variable heating rate profile within the cloud is found which drives dynamical processes and contributes to the thermal stratification at the tropopause.</p>

      <p id="d1e212">Our case studies highlight the importance of a detailed resolution of cirrus clouds and the consideration of surface albedo for estimations of the radiative energy budget in the Arctic.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e224">Cirrus clouds are ice clouds that exist at temperatures below the homogeneous freezing threshold of about 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The required temperatures and humidity conditions are found in the upper troposphere and sometimes in the lowermost stratosphere, leading to an average global coverage of at least 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Cirrus clouds form in ice supersaturated regions in the presence of suitable nuclei, such as solid or liquid aerosol, or via the freezing of (supercooled) liquid droplets in ascending air masses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e246">The impact of cirrus on the radiative energy budget of the atmosphere can be differentiated into direct and indirect effects. The direct effect is absorption and re-emission of thermal (long-wave) radiation and scattering of solar (short-wave) radiation. Indirect or secondary effects arise from the redistribution of water vapour and through heterogeneous physical (e.g. trapping and release; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx57" id="altparen.2"/>) and chemical reactions with radiatively active compounds, such as ozone-depleting substances <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e257">Cirrus occurrence and radiative properties are prone to anthropogenic influence through the introduction of ice-nucleating particles and precursors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.4"/>, including aircraft emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.5"/>, and via the evolution of atmospheric humidity as a feedback to changing climate as a whole. It is known that the microphysical properties of cirrus, such as the particle number concentration, size distribution and shape, depend on the nuclei and the environmental conditions during nucleation, such as updraft speeds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e271">Cirrus clouds are more abundant and thicker in the tropics and at midlatitudes, but there is also considerable coverage in the high-latitude and polar regions. In these areas, the low elevation of the sun and the complete absence of sunlight during polar nights reduce the short-wave effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.7"/>. In addition, the Arctic surface climate is currently undergoing a much more rapid warming transition than the rest of the globe, known as Arctic amplification, which also changes the spatial and temporal patterns of the surface albedo as sea ice and continental ice retreat <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.8"/>. Therefore, the question of how Arctic cirrus clouds impact (will impact) the radiation budget now (and in the future) has not yet been answered satisfactorily. Furthermore, the direction, extent and circumstances under which the cirrus feed back to the current warming are unknown.</p>
      <p id="d1e281">Although cirrus clouds are regularly observed from space with active <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and passive <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> sensors, in situ measurements are needed for the closure of the physical appearance of cirrus ice crystals and their bulk radiative properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.11"/>. There have been some in situ studies on Arctic cirrus clouds in the past, including the following: the Polar Stratospheric Aerosol Experiment (POLSTAR) missions in 1997 and 1998
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.12"/>, the European Polar Stratospheric Cloud and Lee Wave Experiment (EUPLEX) in January–February 2003 and the ENVISAT validation experiments in October 2002 and March 2003,
which all produced measurements of the ice water content (IWC) up to 68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">summary in</named-content></xref>, and the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE) in 1999–2000,
which produced measurements of the IWC and particle size distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.14"/>. The mentioned missions accumulate to a total of 15 flights and significantly contributed to our current picture of cirrus in the Arctic. Nevertheless, these are few studies compared with the much more comprehensive observations in the tropics and at midlatitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.15"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e323">An earlier study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.16"/> used spaceborne radar, lidar and radiance measurements to derive the radiative impact at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) of differently shaped IWC profiles including global variations. Although we also examine this effect for the inhomogeneous vertical IWC distributions in our measurements, our study focuses on high-latitude cirrus, and we demonstrate the radiative effects, including the heating rate, in the entire atmospheric column. This also constitutes a link to cloud dynamics modelling studies that investigate the interaction of heating rate profiles with ice supersaturation, vertical velocity, and particle nucleation and growth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.17"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.18"/> present directly measured heating rates in thin tropical cirrus and highlight the importance of further observations to improve the understanding of the radiative effects of cirrus.</p>
      <p id="d1e335">The present work introduces a novel dataset of in situ IWC measurements carried out during the Polar Stratosphere in a Changing Climate (POLSTRACC) campaign employing HALO, the German High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.19"/>. The campaign was based in Kiruna (67.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 20.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Sweden, and spanned the boreal winter–spring season from 17 December 2015 to 18 March 2016 with 18 science flights and 156 flight hours. The campaign accommodated a number of different science goals, including trace gas composition in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.20"/>, gravity waves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.21"/> and polar stratospheric clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.22"/>. Therefore, the flight strategy often needed to avoid extended sections in cirrus clouds. Nevertheless, a total of 7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or 5600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inside cirrus during 44 individual events was recorded.</p>
      <p id="d1e385">The flights included several climb or descent profiles through cirrus clouds, predominantly located just below the thermal tropopause. In this study, we take advantage of these IWC profiles and embed them in the corresponding atmospheric column of temperature and trace gases from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model analysis. We investigate the location of cirrus in relation to the local tropopause and the characteristic of a tropopause inversion layer (TIL) above. In a second step, this enables radiative transfer calculations that help understand the effect of these high-latitude ice clouds on the atmospheric radiation budget as a whole and on the heating rate profile inside the cloud layer in detail. This constitutes the link between realistic profiles (as they are directly measured) and their impact on local dynamics and the radiative energy budget.</p>
      <p id="d1e388">The paper is laid out as follows: Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> contains the experimental acquisition of the in situ IWC data; an overview and the statistical characteristics of sampled Arctic cirrus clouds are given in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>;  Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> breaks the observations down to the detailed profiles; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> elaborates on the radiative transfer calculations; Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/> contains a discussion of the findings and conclusions drawn from the material; and Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S7"/> closes with a short outlook.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>In situ measurements of the IWC</title>
      <p id="d1e412">The IWC is a derived quantity from our bulk measurements of the total atmospheric water content (TWC), which consists of the gaseous (vapour) phase and condensed phases (liquid and ice). In the present closed-path principle, a sample airflow was led into the aircraft cabin and heated, in order to evaporate all water content. The TWC measurement was then performed with the WAter vapoR ANalyzer (WARAN) laser hygrometer. This instrument derives the concentration of water vapour in the sample flow by using the absorption of the 1.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line from an indium–gallium–arsenide (InGaAs) tunable diode laser (TDL) in a closed measurement cell <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.23"/>. The sensor is the commercial WVSS-II system (SpectraSensors Inc.) with a modified stainless-steel inlet line, and it is connected to a forward-facing trace gas inlet (TGI) with a 9.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter at 31.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distance from the fuselage of HALO. The measurement range is 50–10000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a precision of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whichever is greater. Values are sampled at a frequency of 0.3–0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e477">Although the instrument design and data treatment compensate for drifts due to changing environmental conditions, such as temperature and pressure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.24"/>, slow degradation requires repeated calibration within months. A calibration for the POLSTRACC campaign was performed afterwards on 28 July 2016 using a gauged dew point mirror (MBW 373-LX).
The result is a linear correction function:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M17" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calibrated</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WARAN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WARAN</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the output water vapour mixing ratio from WARAN, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">corrected</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the calibrated mixing ratio (both in ppmv). The calibration coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are determined piecewise:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M22" display="block"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.756</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.045</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WARAN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.619</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.944</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>for</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WARAN</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e675">In cirrus clouds that contain only ice, the ice water content (IWC) can be calculated by subtracting the gas-phase water content (GWC) from the measurement. Due to the lack of an independent GWC measurement in clouds during the POLSTRACC campaign, the saturation mixing ratio is used as a first-order approximation, calculated from the Clausius–Clapeyron equation, as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.25"/>. In reality, the relative humidity with respect to ice (RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) inside cirrus mostly assumes values between 80 and 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Stronger sub- and particularly supersaturations, up to the homogeneous freezing threshold (about 150–165 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), are possible wherever particle growth rates are too slow to mitigate the excess relative humidity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.26"/>. Such pronounced supersaturation has an increased probability at temperatures below 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where cirrus clouds are often characterised by initially low particle number concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.27"/>. High supersaturation is strongly correlated with high updraft speeds, which eventually trigger homogeneous nucleation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.28"/> with a rapid increase in the particle number concentration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.29"/>. Updraft speeds for the selected cases in the sections below reach rather high values of up to about 0.5–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This increases the expected quasi-steady-state relative humidity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.30"/> in the relevant temperature range to up to 120–130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.31"/> note that relaxation times towards this state are concurrently reduced at higher updrafts from a few to tens of minutes; thus, supersaturation depends strongly on the timing of the observation within the cirrus life cycle. This natural climatological variability propagates into the uncertainty of the calculated IWC, but the effect is strongly mitigated by the particle sampling characteristics explained in the following.</p>
      <p id="d1e759">Sub-isokinetic sampling due to a lower inlet flow velocity (around 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared with the speed of airflow around the fuselage (typically around 230–240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) leads to an inertial enhancement of particles in the inlet flow. Therefore, a correcting “enhancement factor” (EF) needs to be applied to the IWC measurement. Following the rationale in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.32"/>, the EF for typical high-latitude cirrus, where significant contributions to the IWC are contained in particles with radii larger than 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.33"/>, can be calculated as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M32" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        with the known airspeed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and inlet velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.34"/>. This approximation is independent of the precise particle size distribution and uses values of about 70 to 80 for the POLSTRACC measurements. Such high EF values effectively lower the detection limit of the corrected IWC to below 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The error in calculating the EF is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to a precision of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the IWC measurements. With this enhancement of the IWC over the GWC, if we were to assume a hypothetical supersaturation of RH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> = 160 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> instead of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the IWC in the cases below would be reduced by a factor of 0.002–0.03 on 25 January 2016 (and by a factor of 0.04–0.14 on 9 March 2016). This is the uncertainty associated with the saturation assumption made above, ranging from negligible within the instrument errors to about 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in case of maximum supersaturation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e930">Comparison of the ice water content (IWC) from the WAter vapoR ANalyzer (WARAN) and Fast In-situ Stratospheric Hygrometer (FISH) instruments for cirrus measurements during the POLSTRACC campaign. The shading indicates the distribution of data within each WARAN bin. Note the double logarithmic axes and the logarithmic colour scale. The solid line represents the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> identity. The dashed lines denote a deviation of a factor of 2, and the dotted lines denote a deviation of a factor of 10. Accounting for the detection limit, WARAN data are clipped below 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e959">Another major uncertainty in the airborne IWC measurements arises from further enhancement or depletion of particles of different sizes in the flow around the aircraft before they reach the sampling position. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.35"/> studied this effect in detail, including data from the Midlatitude Cirrus (ML-CIRRUS) HALO mission <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.36"/>, and found particular ramifications for cabin instruments with inlet positions at the fuselage. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.37"/> found that the IWC from WARAN was mostly systematically higher than the IWC from the Fast In-situ Stratospheric Hygrometer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.38"><named-content content-type="pre">FISH,</named-content></xref>, a Lyman-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> hygrometer that samples total water in a similar way but at a different position. This comparison is repeated with the POLSTRACC data in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Here, a systematic deviation is not obvious, as the correlation between both instruments is well centred on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line and there are no pronounced off-centre branches. More than 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the measurements coincide within a factor of 2 above 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In a linear regression, the coefficient of determination <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller compared with that reported by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.39"/>, but the intercept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.040</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is closer to zero and the slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.952</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> closer to identity.
This enhanced comparability is attributed to improved calibration and a precise synchronisation of data streams. It also shows that the different positions of both inlets, which are about 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> apart along the length of the fuselage, have a less pronounced impact on the observable IWC than previously thought.
Nevertheless, we need to clarify that the IWC measurements from both instruments through roof-mounted TGIs are strongly affected by the enrichment or loss of ice particles due to their inertia in the flow around the aircraft's fuselage. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.40"/> could quantify this effect for the HALO aircraft by comparing the IWC and particle size distribution measurements at the much less affected wing probe position, where IWC deviations of up to 1 order of magnitude were observed at a significant frequency. This flaw cannot be easily overcome for the POLSTRACC data without knowledge about the particle size distribution. Therefore, in the study of the impact of the observed IWC distributions on radiation in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>, we address the effects of underestimated IWC sampling. There, we test the sensitivity of our results to an underestimated IWC by re-evaluating all calculations with IWC profiles multiplied by a factor of 5, which corresponds to the average deviation seen for the FISH instrument in the worst particle size regime above 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Statistics of Arctic cirrus sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e1097">The POLSTRACC mission accommodated several scientific objectives that made use of the high-ceiling-altitude, long-range and heavy-payload capabilities of the HALO research aircraft <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.42"/>. For the observation of trace gas composition and gravity waves, the flight strategy often needed to avoid extended in-cloud sections. Therefore, the dataset represents a relatively random sampling of cirrus at the middle to high latitudes. Nevertheless, the 18 science flights spanning 156 flight hours yielded an accumulated residence time of 7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inside cirrus clouds during 44 individual events, as calculated from the number of WARAN IWC measurements at temperatures below 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1119">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows the IWC measurements as coloured sections of the POLSTRACC flight tracks. It can be seen that there are many shorter sections around the landing sites during the campaign, including the following: Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany (EDMO); Kiruna, Sweden (ESNQ); and Kangerlussuaq, Greenland (BGSF). Cloud layers in these sections were often crossed during approaches and departures. Some more extended sections in mid-flight are found intermittently. The colour coding shows the range of temperatures during these cirrus encounters. The minimum temperature recording during an IWC event was 195.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1134">Map of the North Atlantic showing the flight tracks of the POLSTRACC campaign. Coloured sections denote the IWC measurements from the WARAN instrument. The colour coding indicates the temperature during these sections: red is warmer than blue, and grey colours are above 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1152">With respect to the IWC as an accessible bulk property, previous studies have set up climatologies that relate the IWC to temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.43"/> and other properties, such as effective radius and number concentration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, and have broken them down to different latitudes on Earth and different cloud formation pathways.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.45"/> and later <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.46"/> collected the range of airborne cirrus measurements from different campaigns as a function of latitude and temperature. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, the POLSTRACC measurements are added to this scheme found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.47"/>. The broad latitudinal range of the POLSTRACC measurements can be seen. Although many domains have been covered by previous missions, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows that the new data also extend into gaps that were not filled before. In particular, this concerns the lower temperatures below 210 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> down to 198 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the midlatitudes between 45 and 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. A 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction of the campaign data was sampled north of 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and a significant extension to existing data could be made at 65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N over the whole temperature range. Measurements north of 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N are generally sparse, and POLSTRACC can extend the coverage slightly for cold cirrus below 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, coverage is still sparse with respect to temperature and in the latitudinal range between 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and the pole.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1257">The black contour and diagonal stripes sketch the coverage of cirrus measurements during POLSTRACC with respect to latitude and temperature. For this work, the original of this figure from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.48"/> is adapted, showing the coverage of airborne in situ cirrus missions from the literature.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1269">Since the creation of the original figure by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.49"/>, the POLSTRACC observations represent the only addition of airborne in situ data at northern polar latitudes. Further observations not included in this figure comprise, for example, the previously mentioned ML-CIRRUS campaign at midlatitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.50"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1278">This study focuses on cirrus near the tropopause. We examine the distribution of cirrus sampling along different tropopause-related vertical coordinates, which helps to assess the role of the geometrical location and extent, as well as temperature, in the cloud radiative effect, which at the tropopause becomes especially relevant in view of thermal stratification. Furthermore, different formation pathways and ice particle properties are expected for tropospheric and stratospheric cirrus. The following discussion is limited to observations north of 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a displays the cirrus observations using two vertical scales: the abscissa indicates the potential temperature difference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the observation location to the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (potential vorticity unit, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) isosurface of potential vorticity (often denoted as dynamical tropopause), which is typically located at a potential temperature of 300–320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (but a further <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is possible). The ordinate axis indicates the squared Brunt–Väisälä frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a measure of the static stability of the atmospheric thermal stratification. The colour coding indicates the temperature as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. Close to the tropopause, roughly linear correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be observed, connecting the free, statically less stable troposphere with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the stratosphere with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This correlation is not compact but spans a corridor with a width of 7 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The lower-right branch belongs to January mid-winter measurements, whereas the upper-left branch stems from the March late-winter measurements. This may be interpreted as an increasing stabilisation of the tropopause region within 2 months due to the steady descending motion in the stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.51"/>. The blue colours highlight the occurrence of cold cirrus at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the dynamical tropopause. In most cases, these cirrus clouds on the stratospheric side have no continuation in the troposphere. They build up a lower branch of polar stratospheric ice clouds (PSCs) and do not rely on a tropospheric water vapour supply. Ice nucleation, particle size and habit as well as chemical constitution differ significantly from the tropospheric tropopause cirrus, and they play a crucial role in heterogeneous chemistry in the lowermost stratosphere, especially impacting the budgets of ozone-depleting substances. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b shows the distribution of measurements with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Two major accumulation regions can be identified: one at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and another at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The former can be attributed to tropospheric cirrus extending up until the thermal tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.52"><named-content content-type="pre">according to the definition from the World Meterological Organization, WMO;</named-content></xref> and the latter to stratospheric cirrus with no or only a weak connection to the troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e1653">The distribution of cirrus observations can also be related directly to potential vorticity (PV), as seen in the bars in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c. As already indicated above, a PV of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is usually chosen as the dynamical tropopause and follows other tropopause definitions adequately in areas of weak horizontal wind shear, although it is located systematically below the thermal tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.53"/>. For the extratropics a value of 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is often more consistent with the thermal tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.54"/>. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, the low counts in the 0 to 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range may suggest a low cloud occurrence in the mid-troposphere. This is not necessarily the case and may be a result of the artificial limitation of the data to temperatures below 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which has been applied in order to exclude false hits from mixed-phase clouds. Therefore, certainly more clouds were encountered there, composed of pure ice, mixed phases or liquid water. The highest cirrus occurrence is found below the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isosurface with a maximum at 1–1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is unambiguously located in the troposphere, where the available water vapour content is still at least 1 order of magnitude above stratospheric values. Higher up, cirrus sampling steadily decreases towards a rather uniform distribution above the 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isosurface. This reflects a random distribution of cirrus observations in the stratosphere, where PV varies strongly in the vertical direction and no single level is preferred for cirrus occurrence. Among the generally low IWC sampling frequency in the stratosphere, the apparent rise between 6 and 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PVU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is most likely due to the overall distribution of flight time in the stratosphere during the campaign, as can be seen by the black line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1737">Statistics on the distribution of cirrus sampling below 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during POLSTRACC at high latitudes north of 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. <bold>(a)</bold> Distribution over distance to tropopause (given in kelvin, K, of potential temperature) and the squared Brunt–Väisälä frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The temperature is indicated using colour coding. <bold>(b)</bold> The marginal distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(c)</bold> The distribution of potential vorticity. Cirrus sampling is shown using grey bars, and the total campaign flight time (divided by 10) is shown using the black line.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1795">The following sections (Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>) focus on one subclass of IWC measurements that represent complete vertical profiles of cirrus clouds at the tropopause, seen as the line-forming dots of data in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Complete profiles of cirrus at the high-latitude tropopause</title>
      <p id="d1e1812">In order to investigate the radiative impact of cirrus at the tropopause on the profile of temperature and stability, it is necessary to include the complete profile of the respective cloud in the analysis. The POLSTRACC IWC dataset has been filtered to this end, and a selection of eight events was found that displayed the required profiles. These events are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. There are some caveats towards the use of the respective cloud profiles. First, very low IWC values at or below about 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are below the associated water vapour concentrations. Although thin cirrus clouds are common in the Arctic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.55"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, this complicates the distinction of the precise cloud impact in face of the surrounding atmosphere. Second, some profiles are interrupted by short periods of horizontal flight, extending the time between the cloud bottom and top crossing to well above 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This exacerbates the uncertainty with respect to how well the measurements actually correspond to a real vertical cloud profile. Third, the midlatitude profiles south of 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Germany, Denmark and southern Sweden) are of lesser interest for this study.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1850">List of complete cirrus profiles sampled during the POLSTRACC aircraft campaign. The given latitude is an average value for the profile. The acronyms ML and HL are used to categorise the profiles as middle- or high-latitude profiles respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the vertical span, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature range and the maximum IWC (in molar mixing ratio and in mass concentration) is read from the WARAN measurements. The ice water path (IWP) is calculated by integrating the IWC measurements over the whole profile.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Max IWC (ppmv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">IWP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Time (UTC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (km)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">/(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">08:12–08:33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50.2 (ML)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.8–12.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">205–230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11  /  3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13 Dec 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10:32–10:33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51.2 (ML)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.3–11.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">206–208</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1  /  0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12:39–13:09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">67.8 (HL)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.3–12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">201–235</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">43  /  9.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">31 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14:29–14:41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">66.1 (HL)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.9–8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">206–248</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10  /  3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">05:15–05:23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">67.8 (HL)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.8–9.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">211–230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1  /  0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14:48–14:51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">67.2 (HL)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.9–7.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">219–233</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">51  /  17.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11:09–11:14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55.0 (ML)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0–11.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">206–217</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9  /  2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17:20–17:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50.4 (ML)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.6–11.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">208–218</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26  /  6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2189">Following these criteria, the profiles on 25 January and 9 March 2016 are the best candidates for the present study. The January profile still includes two horizontal sections with an accumulated duration of 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which equals about 230 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in distance.</p>
      <p id="d1e2209">Focusing on these two profiles, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a and c display respective time–altitude cross sections (curtains). The cirrus profiles are marked by the thicker section of the shown flight paths in orange. The background shading displays the squared Brunt–Väisälä frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the ECMWF reanalysis as an indicator of the vertical static stability of the atmosphere. The troposphere and stratosphere can be clearly distinguished by dark blue colours and greenish/yellow tones respectively. Tropospheric enhancements with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to 4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the boundary layer and at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude are identifiable. The strongest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement is found directly above the thermal tropopause (cyan line, representing the WMO definition), marking a pronounced tropopause inversion layer in both cases, despite very different tropopause altitudes. The extended vertical profiles of the reanalysis data show different patterns in both profiles: on 25 January, the stratospheric profile features a fine-scaled structure of static stability that trigger multiple thermal tropopause identifications (cyan lines); in contrast, on 9 March, one broad stratospheric inversion above 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be seen. Both of these observations are not uncommon in regions influenced by orographic gravity waves and in the vicinity of the jet. Missing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data at low altitudes are due to the orographic cutoff of the reanalysis data above terrain in Scandinavia or Greenland.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2291">Time series of the cirrus cloud profiles on 25 January and  9 March 2016. In panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>, the orange line indicates the aircraft flight path. The thicker section highlights the location of the cloud profile. The background shading displays a vertical cross section of the squared Brunt–Väisälä frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from ECMWF reanalysis data interpolated along the flight track. Cyan lines indicate thermal tropopause altitudes according to the WMO definition. Panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show time series of IWC measurements from the WARAN instrument.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2323">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b and d  contain the in situ IWC measurements from the WARAN instrument, where the time series are aligned with the curtain plots above. On 25 January, the measurements show a considerable variability in the horizontal flight sections, reflecting the overall patchy atmospheric structure. In contrast, the descent towards the end of the profile is characterised by an IWC below 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppmv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before an enhanced IWC is again observed at the cloud bottom below 8.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On 9 March, the profile exhibits an almost symmetrical double-peaked structure of the IWC distribution inside the cloud. In both cases, the IWC varies frequently by up to 1 order of magnitude. From these slant profiles, we derive vertical IWC profiles for the later sections just by stacking the measurements vertically, neglecting any horizontal inhomogeneity in the clouds. Horizontal flight path sections are condensed into one mean IWC value. Although this no longer represents the actual whole (but unknown) three-dimensional IWC distribution inside the cloud, we still deem these artificial one-dimensional profiles to be realistic. Especially in the critical 25 January case, a very similar profile would result if we only considered the last section of the flight path that contains the majority of the vertical coverage.</p>
      <p id="d1e2344">We note that possible lower-level clouds might exist below the observed cirrus or also along ground-reaching flight paths. Beyond possible visual identification, such clouds were excluded from sampling (via inlet flow cutoff) during the POLSTRACC campaign to avoid impairment of the targeted measurements of low concentrations of water vapour and cloud water in the upper troposphere and above.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Radiative transfer calculations</title>
      <p id="d1e2356">Radiative transfer calculations focus on the ice clouds that have been probed on 25 January and 9 March 2016. Both days show significant differences in the shape of the IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in the geometrical thickness of the ice cloud (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). In particular, the IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) profiles reveal vertical fine structures.</p>
      <p id="d1e2375">This section describes the radiative transfer model, its input and treated radiation parameters. It is shown how the specific properties of the measured IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) profiles affect irradiances, the radiative forcing and heating rate profiles. The radiative effects of the detected IWC fine structures are discussed via comparison to the results that would emerge for IWC profiles with vertically coarser resolutions. The mentioned uncertainty of the IWC measurements, which is likely an underestimation, is addressed by repeated calculations using the IWC profiles multiplied by 5.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2387">Vertical profiles of the measured ice water content (IWC, dark blue) on <bold>(a)</bold> 25 January and <bold>(b)</bold> 9 March 2016 and the effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, dark red) derived from a parameterisation after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.56"/> describing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the IWC. Vertical averages of the IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are indicated using light blue and light red lines respectively. Dark lines show the temperature profiles, and grey shading illustrates the total vertical extent of the measured ice clouds.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>5.1.1</label><title>Radiative transfer model and input parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e2454">Radiative transfer calculations are based on the uvspec routine from the libRadtran software package <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.57"/>. The one-dimensional six-stream radiative transfer solver DISORT (DIScrete Ordinate Radiative Transfer) was used to provide static profiles of irradiances and heating rates in the short-wave (SW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24–5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the long-wave (LW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) spectral range. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows IWC profiles measured on 25 January and on 9 March 2016 along with the temperature profiles serving as input. Apart from the IWC, radiative transfer calculations need the effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). While the IWC is based on in situ measurements, assumptions are made for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The vertical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles have been generated using a parameterisation after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.58"/> that describes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the IWC by a polynomial fit of observed data. The data were collected at Arctic latitudes during the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) at the ARM North Slope of Alaska site in autumn 2004. The effective radii (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values very probably do not exactly correspond to those present in the ice clouds measured during POLSTRACC, but this way their values may at least be realistically limited.</p>
      <p id="d1e2562">According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.59"/>, the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the IWC is only weak for Arctic ice clouds and for IWC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0015 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows relatively small altitude-dependent variations in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and, similarly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes by less than a factor of 2 with the IWC multiplied by 5. Thus, the vertical profile of the ice cloud optical thickness is only highly correlated with the profile of the IWC itself. For IWC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0015 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, values of the polynomial fit have been linearly extrapolated to avoid an unrealistic increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2663">The translation of the IWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the optical properties follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx3" id="text.60"/>. Due to the lack of in situ measurements of ice crystal habits during POLSTRACC, the uvspec setting of a general habit mixture (GHM) is taken. The GHM assumes size-dependent fractions of different habits including, for example, pristine crystals like droxtals, columns and plates; bullet rosettes; and aggregates of columns and plates. Under these assumptions the optical thickness of the ice cloud on 25 January 2016 results in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 0.65, and it results in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.68 for the ice cloud on 9 March 2016, which is moderately opaque <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.61"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Horizontally homogeneous model clouds are resolved vertically into 72 layers in order to adequately represent the measured IWC fine structures.</p>
      <p id="d1e2729">Concerning the reflection properties of the lower boundary, surface types typical of Arctic regions are considered: a snow-/ice-free ocean, a snow-covered surface and one land surface assumed to represent a mix of snow-covered and snow-free areas. In principal, the reflection properties of these surface types are highly variable in time and space and depend on various parameters. The reflection of the ocean, for example, is affected by the surface wind speed and by the type and concentration of existing hydrosols. The reflection properties of snow depend on the grain size of the snow, its age and the degree of pollution. For the sake of simplification, although the term albedo is used in the following, the lower boundary condition of the model atmosphere is described by a spectrally constant and isotropic bidirectional reflection distribution function (BRDF); this function depends on the solar zenith angle (sza) in the case of the ocean and is independent of the sza for snow and the mixed surface. The BRDF is a pure property of the surface and is not affected by atmospheric conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2733">Simplifications are made for numerical simulations. In case of the ocean, a broadband albedo following the measurements of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.62"/> is used that depends on the sza and represents a mean surface roughness at a wind speed of 7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kn</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The ocean albedo increases significantly for large sza values. For this study, data corresponding to the curve in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> are used. As an approximation, the snow surface is represented by a constant broadband albedo of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to old and fresh snow respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.63"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. As the variation in the snow albedo is less pronounced for sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
compared with the ocean albedo, sza-dependence is not taken into account. Furthermore, to estimate the albedo effects of Arctic land surface consisting of different components, such as a mixture of snow and snow-free (rocky) areas, a constant value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used. In the LW range, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.64"/>, a broadband emissivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed for the ocean and mixed surface, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed for snow surfaces.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2871">Broadband albedo at the ocean surface as a function of solar zenith angle after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.65"/> for an atmospheric transmission of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These values have been used as input for the radiative transfer model.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2898">For aerosol, a uvspec setting is selected that describes a standard maritime haze in the lower 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the winter season. The vertical profiles of the meteorological parameters and the trace gases are described in the following section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>5.1.2</label><title>Meteorological data and trace gases</title>
      <p id="d1e2917">For the one-dimensional radiative transfer calculations, a complete profile of temperature and radiatively relevant species in the troposphere and stratosphere is required. Therefore, we use data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) analysis product. Distributions of methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrogen monoxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrogen dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are taken from the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS). The ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) distribution is taken from the Global and regional Earth-system Monitoring using Satellite and in situ data (GEMS). High-resolution hourly data on 137 model levels are provided for the meteorological quantities (IFS) including specific humidity (3-hourly and 60 levels for CAMS and GEMS). The model data are interpolated in space and time along the flight paths of the HALO aircraft during the POLSTRACC campaign.</p>
      <p id="d1e2961">In situ values of meteorological quantities like atmospheric pressure and temperature as well as geolocation are provided by the Basic HALO Measurement And Sensor System (BAHAMAS) at a 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> frequency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.66"/>. The BAHAMAS temperature and humidity data and in situ-measured ozone are only used for comparison in order to assess the consistency of the model with the in situ data during the relevant flight sections. Temperature is captured quite well by the model, with a slight tendency to underestimate the values by up to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The vertical structure in (slant) profiles is consistent; in particular, the height of the thermal tropopause from both sources coincides. Specific humidity in the vicinity of the IWC measurements (i.e. in neighbouring cloud-free sections) is found to agree within about 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lacks a systematic bias. This also translates into a good representation of specific humidity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.67"><named-content content-type="pre">for context, see e.g.</named-content></xref>. The GEMS ozone product is consistent with the in situ measurements from the onboard Fast and Accurate In Situ Ozone Instrument (FAIRO) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.68"/> near the surface and, for the most part, in the stratosphere. In the regime above 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the model does not capture the small-scale variability in the observations, with typical deviations of 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Due to the overall satisfactory agreement, model and in situ data are not merged for single atmospheric parameters to avoid possible edge artefacts. Instead, we use the model data for the whole column for all quantities except for the IWC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>5.1.3</label><title>Radiative quantities</title>
      <p id="d1e3043">With a view to the following sections, the definitions of five radiative quantities are given. A basic model output is the upward- and downward-directed irradiance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">up</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively) at each model layer. These irradiances are integrated over a wavelength interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (here over the SW and LW range) and are given in watts per square metre (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The balance of incoming and outgoing irradiance at each model layer is defined as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M178" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">up</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3152">Balancing the irradiances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the SW and LW spectral intervals gives the net radiation budget or net irradiance (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), hereinafter referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M182" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3223">The net forcing RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is defined as the difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for the atmosphere with an embedded ice cloud minus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the cloud-free atmosphere:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M187" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ice</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">free</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3317">The heating rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> integrated over the wavelength interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the temperature change in a model layer (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, kelvin per day) and is defined as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M191" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the air density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the specific heat capacity of air at constant pressure and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical divergence of the irradiance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Balancing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the SW and LW spectral interval gives the net heating rate (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), hereinafter referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M199" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>5.2.1</label><title>TOA net irradiances</title>
      <p id="d1e3563">Net irradiances at the TOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of the sza based on IWC profiles measured on 25 January and on 9 March 2016 are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. Dashed curves result for the cloud-free atmosphere. Solar zenith angles in the range of 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> occur at Arctic latitudes north of 66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N within the period from 10 September to 31 March. Horizontal grey lines calculated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> additionally show the LW component of the irradiance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The SW component (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the difference between the curves for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and b compare <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over an ice-free ocean and over surfaces assumed to be covered with aged snow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and fresh snow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The curve for the albedo <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is, as mentioned, intended to give an estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for land surfaces with partial snow cover.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3793"><bold>(a)</bold> Irradiance at the top of the atmosphere on 25 January 2016 as a function of solar zenith angle over an ice-free ocean, over snow-covered surfaces and over a mixed surface with albedo values as indicated. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> is the same as panel <bold>(a)</bold> but for the atmosphere on 9 March 2016. Solid curves show the atmosphere with an embedded ice cloud, whereas dashed curves show a cloud-free atmosphere. Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are the same as panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> respectively but for ice clouds with higher optical thicknesses obtained by multiplying the measured profile IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) by a factor of 5. Horizontal grey lines, valid for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicate the LW component of the irradiance.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3842">Note that, in order to examine the diurnal course of net irradiances for selected geographical locations and days from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> (and following figures), the sza simply has to be determined as a function of latitude, longitude, day and daytime. If the local minimum sza is known, the possible irradiance range lies to the left of this sza.</p>
      <p id="d1e3848">For all curves in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is minimal at the highest sza and increases with decreasing sza. In other words, with increasing sza, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> converges to the long-wave component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (grey lines).</p>
      <p id="d1e3901">For a better understanding of sza-dependent irradiances in the short-wave range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the following should be noted: with increasing sza, the light paths through the atmosphere become longer. As a consequence, the absolute value of the contribution of the downward-directed irradiance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases in all layers within the atmosphere. The proportion of the direct component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dir</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in each atmospheric layer depends on the optical thickness of the atmosphere between this layer and the TOA. Within ice clouds, a large part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dir</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is scattered in the forward direction by the ice crystals, but the proportion of direct radiation at the cloud base nevertheless decreases in favour of the diffuse component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diff</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing sza. For example, on 25 January 2016 and at sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the proportion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dir</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transmitted through the cloud is about 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and that of diffuse radiation is, correspondingly, 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dir</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is negligible. At the cloud top, about 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the incident solar irradiance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reflected at sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 64<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas 66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reflected at sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. At cloud top, the absolute values of upward-directed irradiances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">up</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> strongly depend on the surface albedo and are highly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4189">Although the difference between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the ocean and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the snow surfaces is relatively small (e.g. about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ocean</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the maximum sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the curves diverge quickly with decreasing sza (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a, b, c, d).
The reason for this is that, in the case of atmospheres containing semi-transparent ice clouds or under cloud-free conditions, the contribution of the (positive) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with decreasing surface albedo and with decreasing sza. This effect is further enhanced by differences between the sza-dependent ocean albedo and the constant snow albedo which increase with decreasing sza. As a consequence, the transition from negative to positive values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, equivalent to a change from a loss to a gain in radiative energy, occurs at a greater sza over the ocean than over aged snow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or fresh snow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Furthermore, over snow surfaces, the transition from a negative to a positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shifted towards a higher sza when compared with results for a cloud-free atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e4381">In case of the mixed surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the differences of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the cloud-free atmosphere and the atmosphere containing an ice cloud are smallest for about sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a). This is a constellation where the specific ice cloud properties result in a negligible net radiative forcing RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e4445">Comparing the curves of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and b, their behaviour as a function of sza and surface albedo is qualitatively the same. Differences between cloudy and cloud-free atmospheres, resulting in the radiative forcing (RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), are further discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4477">The extent to which higher optical thicknesses of the ice clouds affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also investigated. For this purpose, measured profiles of IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) were multiplied by a factor of 5, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being adjusted according to the parameterisation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.69"/> in each layer. Higher values of IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) result in optical thicknesses of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 25 January and 9 March respectively. In the SW, higher optical thicknesses of the ice clouds lead to a larger contribution of the upward-directed reflected radiation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the same time, increased optical thicknesses  of ice clouds increase the cloud LW effect, i.e. rendering more surface-emitted LW radiation to be absorbed by ice clouds and, hence, causing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be less negative (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c and d vs. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and  b). One net effect is an overall shift in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> towards higher values, which is especially noticeable at a large sza, where SW effects are increasingly negligible. For example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is increased by about 62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 25 January and by about 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 9 March at sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e4699">The same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> but for irradiance at the bottom of the atmosphere (surface).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>5.2.2</label><title>Surface net irradiances</title>
      <p id="d1e4718">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> presents net irradiances at the surface (or bottom of the atmosphere) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The effect of various surface albedo values on the relative course of the curves with respect to each other corresponds to that in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. However, in comparison to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>), the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing sza is less pronounced. The reason for this is the generally reduced LW radiation emission from the surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as the values at sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> show. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the limiting factor for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the other end of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, at small sza values, the curves of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>) tend to converge for the same albedo values, which is a consequence of increasing forward scattering of incoming SW radiation at the ice crystals. Generally, with decreasing sza, an increasing short-wave component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is an effect that becomes stronger moving toward smaller surface albedo values. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the difference between the downward- and upward-directed components of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is minimal, leading to a weak dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on sza (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a, b, c, d). As can also be seen from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>, the ice cloud lowers the positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the dark ocean surface within a wide range of sza values when compared with the cloud-free atmosphere. The reason for this is a dominating shadowing effect of the ice clouds, i.e. the downward-directed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced more strongly than the surface LW emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes (see grey solid and dashed lines in Fig. 9). Over a bright snow surface with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SW contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> become smaller, leading to correspondingly smaller changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In most cases, the curves representing the cloud-free atmosphere are even below those of the cloudy atmosphere. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the IWC multiplied by 5 is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c and d.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>5.2.3</label><title>Radiative forcing</title>
      <p id="d1e5099">Net radiative forcings at the TOA (RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), as defined by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>), are displayed as a function of sza for 25 January 2016 and 9 March 2016 in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a–d. Over bright snow surfaces, RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is positive on both days within the entire range of 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e5169">Radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere as a function of the solar zenith angle on <bold>(a)</bold> 25 January 2016 and on <bold>(b)</bold> 9 March 2016 for different surface albedo assumptions as indicated. Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are the same as panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> respectively but for ice clouds with higher optical thicknesses obtained by multiplying the measured profile IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) by a factor of 5. Horizontal dashed lines, valid for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicate the LW component of the forcing.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5216">At sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the net forcing is mainly determined by the LW forcing, resulting in an energy gain in the system. With a decreasing sza in the range of about 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, an ice cloud over snow (and partly over the mixed surface) increases the amount of reflected SW radiation, leading to a reduction in the atmospheric energy gain. For sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the amount of reflected SW radiation decreases due to the pronounced forward scattering of ice crystals, herewith causing an increase in RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5299"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Over the ocean, positive RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values result for sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on 25 January 2016 and for sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on 9 February 2016. For smaller sza values, RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> even turns into the negative range. One reason for a negative RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is that the ocean albedo is relatively high at a large sza, but it decreases significantly with decreasing sza (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). The smaller the ocean albedo becomes with decreasing sza, the larger the relative contribution of outgoing SW radiation that reduces RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In general, it can be said that the sign of RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is predominantly determined by whether the ice cloud albedo is greater or smaller than the surface albedo. Furthermore, ice cloud layers emit at higher temperatures on 9 March 2016 with the consequence that the LW component of the radiative forcing is about 15–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller than on 25 January 2016. All curves are affected; over the ocean, this means that the transition of RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into negative values is shifted towards a larger sza (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a, b). Curves for RF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the IWC multiplied by 5 are displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c and d. Their greater spread is a consequence of increased ice cloud optical thicknesses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>5.2.4</label><title>IWC fine structures</title>
      <p id="d1e5466">As mentioned, IWC profiles measured during the POLSTRACC campaign show vertical fine structures (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a, b). It is investigated how such structures affect the profiles of the net irradiances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and heating rates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a reference, additional radiative transfer calculations have been carried out for synthetic ice clouds with a vertically constant IWC profile, IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In a second step, IWC profiles with different vertical resolutions are used as a reference. All synthetic IWC profiles together with the assigned profiles of the effective radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IWC</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.70"/> are designed in such a way that the optical thickness is the same as for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that the profiles of the temperature affecting the LW irradiance profiles are displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5565">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a, e, i and m compare SW and LW irradiance profiles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated for the IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles. Altitude-dependent differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (solid and dashed lines) follow the corresponding difference between IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that, apart from the influence of trace gases and aerosols and in view of relatively weak variability in the profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), the LW thermal emission of a layer is proportional to the ice water content and, thus, proportional to the cloud optical thickness of the layer. In addition, the LW emission depends on the temperature distribution within the ice cloud layer. At the large solar zenith angle sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, LW radiation dominates the altitude-dependent changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a, i).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e5764">Irradiance profiles of measured (solid) and constant (dashed) IWC profiles for selected values of solar zenith angle and albedo as indicated. Panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(e)</bold>, <bold>(i)</bold> and <bold>(m)</bold> show the LW (red, top axis scale) and SW (blue, bottom axis scale) irradiances. The top axis is shown using negative numbers because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is directed upward. Panels <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(f)</bold>, <bold>(j)</bold> and <bold>(n)</bold> depict the net irradiances. All irradiance scales span a range of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, albeit at different absolute positions. Panels <bold>(c)</bold>, <bold>(g)</bold>, <bold>(k)</bold> and <bold>(o)</bold> show the net heating rate profiles of the measured and the constant IWC profiles. Panels <bold>(d)</bold>, <bold>(h)</bold>, <bold>(l)</bold> and <bold>(p)</bold> outline the difference between the net heating rate profiles of the measured and the constant IWC profiles.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5853">On 25 January 2016, LW irradiances at the cloud top (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are smaller for the measured profile IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which is related to IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a). The reason for this is a smaller LW emission from the IWC maximum near the cloud top due to relatively cold temperatures in combination with an increased optical thickness here. Below the upper IWC peak, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger than for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because the upward-directed emissions from the surface and from the IWC maximum near the cloud base are balanced by smaller downward-directed emissions from colder layers above. Major differences between irradiances for the IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are confined to the layers within the cloud and reach up to about 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, on 25 January 2016, it is the combination of the vertical inhomogeneity of the IWC profile (two different maxima) and the geometrical thickness of the entire ice cloud associated with larger vertical temperature differences that causes pronounced altitude-dependent LW irradiance differences. The ice cloud causes irradiance differences in the order of a few watts per square metre which penetrate up to the TOA (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e6012">On 9 March 2016, the geometrical thickness of the ice cloud is reduced showing two closely spaced maxima in the middle of the IWC profile. The overall shape is more symmetric than on 25 January 2016 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b). Switching from the measured to the constant IWC profile does not lead to a stronger weighting of layers emitting LW radiation with significantly different temperatures. As a consequence, LW irradiance differences inside the ice cloud are smaller than on 25 January 2016 (about 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and even smaller at the TOA and BOA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>i, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e6041">Net irradiances at the top of the atmosphere and at the surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively) calculated for measured and vertically constant profiles of the ice water content (IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) minus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Results are selected for four solar zenith angle (sza) values and for the days 25 January and 9 March 2016.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">sza</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(measured – constant)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ocean</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (sza), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ocean</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">168.85</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">171.34</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.49</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58.07</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60.06</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.99</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">94.40  /  127.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">92.40  /  128.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.00</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">269.80  /  273.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">267.76  /  273.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.04  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">171.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">171.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.79  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  4.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  4.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.08  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">91.46  /  130.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">91.37  /  130.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.09  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">266.84  /  286.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">266.72  /  287.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.12  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">176.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">178.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.66  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">118.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.97  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.96  /  0.46</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.20  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.21  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.99  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">179.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">179.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">123.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">123.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.08  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e7323">A smaller solar zenith angle of sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> increases the contribution of SW radiation significantly (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>e, m). Irradiance differences due to the influence of differently shaped IWC profiles are mainly a result of scattering processes. SW downward-directed irradiances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are smaller below the relative IWC maxima. The for this reason is that the cloud optical thickness (and thus the extinction due to scattering) is higher at altitudes of the IWC maxima when compared with values of the constant profile IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the same altitude (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>e, m). On 25 January 2016, the vertically extended maximum of the IWC produces the greatest differences. On 9 March 2016, small enhancements of the downward-directed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> result for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the upper edge of the maxima due to multiple-scattering effects (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>m).</p>
      <p id="d1e7430">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b, f, j and n compare profiles of net irradiances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balanced over the SW and LW range based on IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As is to be expected, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflects that the specific properties of the profile IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 25 January 2016 cause the greatest differences to the results obtained for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> contains data of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as their differences <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) − <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the TOA and at the BOA. Numbers show that, for the individual day, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are of the same order of magnitude independent of the two surface types considered. In most cases, the absolute values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are smaller than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. An exception is again the results for 25 January 2016 at TOA. The reason for this is already given in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a and e, which show that the upward-directed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at cloud top differs by about 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LW</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> related to IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results obtained with the IWC multiplied by 5 are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e7798">Vertical profiles of the IWC are not always available at high vertical resolution. In models (e.g. climate models), the vertical resolution of ice clouds near the tropopause is usually in the order of several hundred metres. The effect of different IWC vertical resolutions on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>. This shows differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the IWC measurements on 25 January 2016 and  9 March 2016 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for IWC profiles resulting from a division of the entire ice cloud into an increasing number of sublayers. Within these sublayers, the IWC is vertically averaged. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>, the curves of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> converge relatively quickly to zero with the number of sublayers, although this convergence is different for 25 January 2016 and  9 March 2016. The reason for this is again given by the different IWC profiles on both days. On 25 January, a resolution of the ice cloud into 10 sublayers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">460</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) results in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is already reached for a resolution into 5 sublayers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on  9 March. This is valid for sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as for sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e8005">Differences between net irradiances (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) calculated for the measured IWC profile and IWC profiles with different vertical resolution. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis shows the number of layers into which the entire ice cloud is divided.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS5">
  <label>5.2.5</label><title>Heating rates</title>
      <p id="d1e8046">According to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>), wavelength-integrated net heating rate profiles are proportional to the vertical divergence of the net irradiance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and can be read from the profiles shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b, f, j and n (results in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c, g, k and o). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mainly affected by the profile of IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the ice cloud; thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences due to IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are particularly pronounced within the ice cloud and are minimal above and below the ice cloud layer. As a consequence, differences in net heating rate profiles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occur within the ice cloud on both days (25 January and 9 March 2016) and for both solar zenith angles (sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>d, h, l, p). On 25 January 2016, the maximum difference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 4.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. On 9 March 2016, the corresponding maximum and minimum values are 1.57 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively. Within the cloud, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is in the order of the magnitude of the net heating rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is negligible above and below the cloud.</p>
      <p id="d1e8438">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> presents curves that result for an ocean surface as the lower boundary. Comparing heating rate differences <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IWC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IWC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the ocean with those over snow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reveals a difference of 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the altitude of the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) on 25 January 2016 (not shown). The corresponding change at the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in 0.002 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Furthermore, on 9 March 2016, changes at the maximum and minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are very small. At the BOA, all changes are in the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the transition from the ocean surface to a bright snow surface results in small changes in the heating rate profiles, both within and outside the ice cloud.</p>
      <p id="d1e8701">When multiplying the IWC by 5 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes significantly in shape. On 25 January, the maximum is 7.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. On 9 March, the maximum and minimum values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 9.06 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively, which both result from sza <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The change in shape or vertical dependency is due to the high optical thicknesses of the clouds and manifests itself mainly in two features: first, the scaling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is stronger at lower altitudes than up higher, due to the higher absolute concentration of ice water in the thicker air at lower altitudes; second, the influence of the SW contribution is more limited to the uppermost cloud layers. This leads to a reduced warming impact of the SW regime on the overall heating rate profile, especially in the 9 March case, where the majority of the IWC distribution is more centred in the cloud profile. Nonetheless, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> still remains negligible above and below the clouds.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e8921">The same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>d, h, l and p but for ice clouds with higher optical thicknesses as a result of multiplying the entire profile IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) by a factor of 5.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/587/2023/acp-23-587-2023-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e8949">Our radiative transfer simulations for selected profiles of the IWC measured during the POLSTRACC campaign indicate that an ice cloud of extended geometrical thickness and a specific vertically asymmetric fine structure of the IWC change the radiation budget at the TOA compared with the results of a vertically constant IWC profile of equal optical thickness. Effects are significant and, for our cases, in the order of a few watts per square metre (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Fine structures in geometrically thin ice clouds that have a more symmetric IWC profile do not lead to a noticeable modification of the TOA radiation budget when compared to the case of a vertically constant IWC. This is consistent with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.71"/>, who performed a statistical analysis of cirrus IWC profiles and their radiative effects from active and passive spaceborne remote sensing products. Similar to our above result, they concluded that the LW effect of a certain profile (at the TOA) is modulated by an “effective radiative layer” with respect to a constant IWC profile, which reflects internal inhomogeneity in the vertical IWC distribution. We show that the uncertainty arising from a possible coarser vertical resolution is reduced to below 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the inhomogeneous IWC profile if layers are thinner than about 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.72"/> is dominated by low and midlatitude cirrus properties with a higher IWP and optical thickness. In contrast, our analyses are focused on thinner (still opaque) Arctic cirrus clouds that exist in darkness or at high solar zenith angles such that their net radiative forcing may be of alternating sign.</p>
      <p id="d1e8991">A significant impact on net irradiances at the top and the bottom of the atmosphere is found to originate from the albedo of typical Arctic surface types, such as the open ocean or snow-covered regions, which also implies effects on the radiative forcing. Depending on the solar zenith angle, effects are strong for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mostly strong or moderate for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but weak for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under conditions of fresh fallen snow. Age and pollution of snow seem important factors in this context. For example, the transition from negative to positive values of the TOA radiation budget, equivalent to a change from a loss to a gain in radiative energy, occurs at greater solar zenith angles over the ocean than, for example, over aged snow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Furthermore, over aged snow, the transition is shifted towards a higher solar zenith angle when compared with results for a cloud-free atmosphere. This means that the presence of cirrus leads to an enhanced gain in radiative energy in the Arctic atmosphere in most cases during autumn to spring as well as over bright surfaces. Therefore, in scenarios with an overall negative trend in surface albedos in the Arctic, the positive radiative forcing effect of cirrus is expected to decrease. This decrease is relevant in view of the Arctic amplification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.73"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, as it constitutes a possible counteracting effect. Notwithstanding, the (direct) impact on surface net irradiances and, therefore, on surface temperature is much less pronounced.</p>
      <p id="d1e9062">Instantaneous heating rate profiles of the atmosphere are mainly affected by fine structures of the IWC within the cloud layer and remain negligible below and above the cloud. The effect of different surface albedo values on instantaneous heating rate profiles is only very weak. Depending on the profile of IWC or optical thickness, the heating rate profile can contribute to a strengthening or weakening of a given structure in the temperature profile, especially concerning the cold point of the tropopause, as well as the strength of the above inversion layer. The strong tropospheric lapse rate in some of our observed cloud profiles induces a stabilising radiative effect of the cloud in most of the tropospheric heating rate profile inside the cloud layer, with an overall higher (LW) heating rate at the cloud top (warming) than at the cloud bottom (less warming or cooling). However, first of all, a heating rate profile will trigger cloud internal processes through evaporation or latent heat release that drive vertical motion, modify the temperature gradient and change the microphysical properties of the ice particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e9065">Concerning a probable underestimation of the IWC in the measurements, we derived that a potentially higher true IWC profile would lead, as can be expected, to a higher warming impact of the cirrus on the TOA radiation budget and would dampen the effect of different surface albedo values. At the same time, the heating rate profiles would be more dominated by the LW contribution due to the strongly enhanced optical thickness. Still, we conclude that our original calculations are of value because many thinner cirrus clouds exist in the Arctic (and were observed) to which our results would apply accordingly, beyond the two cases that we analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <label>7</label><title>Outlook</title>
      <p id="d1e9076">Some aspects of Arctic ice clouds have not been treated in this work, such as the effects of the modification of size and number density by specific cloud formation regimes. Likewise, the effects of different ice crystal habits or habit compositions on SW and LW irradiances, radiative forcings and heating rates were not in the focus of this study. Based on measurements of a subtropical cirrus, studies such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.74"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.75"/> have shown that irradiances are significantly sensitive to different ice crystal shapes in the SW and LW, depending on solar zenith angle, location above or below the cloud, cirrus optical thickness, and the spectral region within the SW and LW range. For certain constellations, maximum changes in irradiances even reach 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SW and up to 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the LW. The effects of specific habits (i.e. hexagonal columns, plates, rosettes, aggregates and spheres) are intercompared. As mentioned, radiative transfer calculations in this study have been carried out under the assumption of a general habit mixture (GHM) due to the lack of in situ measurements of ice crystal habits during the POLSTRACC campaign. It cannot be ruled out that different habit mixes occur in the Arctic, in which pristine crystals (e.g. hexagonal plates or columns) play a more dominant role. Nevertheless, we choose the GHM because the assumption that an ice cloud consists of one habit type only also seems unrealistic.</p>
      <p id="d1e9101">The flight and measurement strategies pose additional sources of uncertainty. Slant pseudo-vertical IWC profiles or, even more so, those with intermediate level flight sections extend horizontally over several 10 to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and likely do not adequately account for lateral inhomogeneity within the cirrus cloud field. This uncertainty might be reduced with higher vertical speed, at the cost of reduced vertical resolution or sensor accuracy, or better quantified by repeated sampling in different directions or co-located satellite observations. Similar studies would also greatly benefit from information on potential lower cloud coverage below the cirrus.</p>
      <p id="d1e9112">Recent and current observational activities will provide additional data on cloud microphysical properties to better represent real Arctic cirrus in future work, aiming for a closure of the physics of particle-scale processes with the radiation field. In this respect, the in situ measurements of the recent CIRRUS-HL (Cirrus in High Latitudes) mission are very promising. Further useful contributions are expected to come from ongoing and planned campaign activities.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title/>
      <p id="d1e9125">This appendix includes a table similar to Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> but showing further results from radiative transfer calculations that were carried out with IWC profiles scaled by a factor of 5, as described in the main text.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d1e9134">The same as Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> but for ice clouds with higher optical thicknesses as a result of multiplying the entire profile IWC(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) by a factor of 5.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">sza</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">net</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">meas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">for IWC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">const</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(measured - constant)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ocean</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (sza), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ocean</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">107.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">51.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">110.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.65  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.06  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">90.56  /  77.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">86.28  /  77.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.28  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">225.38  /  181.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">220.87  /  181.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.51  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">139.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">139.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65.27  /  83.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64.73  /  83.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">202.65  /  196.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">201.82  /  196.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83  /  0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">snow</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">112.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">115.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.65  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.10  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.25  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25 Jan 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57.36  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52.97  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.39  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">145.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">61.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">145.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">61.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.23  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.59  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9 Mar 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.82  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.97  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.85  /  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e10307">In situ observational data and ECMWF model data are available from the HALO database (<uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/3</uri>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="altparen.76"/>).  Results from the radiative transfer calculations are available from <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7387075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7387075</ext-link> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="altparen.77"/>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e10325">AM and RM developed the concept for and conducted the study; they also drafted the manuscript. RM executed the radiative transfer calculations. SK, RH, TJ, AM, CV, MK and CR performed the in situ measurements. All authors contributed to intense discussion and to writing the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e10331">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e10340">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e10347">The authors are grateful to Silke Groß, Yi Huang and the three anonymous referees for their reviews of the manuscript, which helped to improve the paper substantially. The authors thank Sonja Gisinger for kindly preparing the EMCWF and CAMS data.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e10352">This research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. Vo1504/7-1).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?>publication were covered by the German Aerospace Center (DLR).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e10363">This paper was edited by Xiaohong Liu and reviewed by Yi Huang and three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Afchine et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Afchine et al.(2018)</label><?label Afchine2018?><mixed-citation>Afchine, A., Rolf, C., Costa, A., Spelten, N., Riese, M., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Heller, R., Kaufmann, S., Minikin, A., Voigt, C., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Lawson, P., Lykov, A., Khaykin, S., and Krämer, M.: Ice particle sampling from aircraft – influence of the probing position on the ice water content, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4015–4031, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4015-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-4015-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baum et~al.(2005)}}?><label>Baum et al.(2005)</label><?label Baum2005?><mixed-citation>Baum, B. A., Yang, P., Heymsfield, A. J., Platnick, S., King, M. D., Hu, Y.-X.,
and Bedka, S. T.: Bulk Scattering Properties for the Remote Sensing of Ice
Clouds. Part II: Narrowband Models, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 1896–1911,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2309.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jam2309.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Baum et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Baum et al.(2007)</label><?label Baum2007?><mixed-citation>Baum, B. A., Yang, P., Nasiri, S., Heidinger, A. K., Heymsfield, A., and Li,
J.: Bulk Scattering Properties for the Remote Sensing of Ice Clouds. Part
III: High-Resolution Spectral Models from 100 to 3250 cm-1, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 46, 423–434, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2473.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jam2473.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Birner(2010)}}?><label>Birner(2010)</label><?label Birner2010?><mixed-citation>Birner, T.: Residual Circulation and Tropopause Structure, J. Atmos. Sci., 67,   2582–2600, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jas3287.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010jas3287.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Borrmann et~al.(1996)}}?><label>Borrmann et al.(1996)</label><?label Borrmann1996?><mixed-citation>Borrmann, S., Solomon, S., Dye, J. E., and Luo, B.: The potential of cirrus
clouds for heterogeneous chlorine activation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23,
2133–2136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96gl01957" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96gl01957</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Braun et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Braun et al.(2019)</label><?label Braun2019?><mixed-citation>Braun, M., Grooß, J.-U., Woiwode, W., Johansson, S., Höpfner, M., Friedl-Vallon, F., Oelhaf, H., Preusse, P., Ungermann, J., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Ziereis, H., and Braesicke, P.: Nitrification of the lowermost stratosphere during the exceptionally cold Arctic winter 2015–2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13681–13699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13681-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-13681-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bucholtz et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Bucholtz et al.(2010)</label><?label Bucholtz2010?><mixed-citation>Bucholtz, A., Hlavka, D. L., McGill, M. J., Schmidt, K. S., Pilewskie, P.,
Davis, S. M., Reid, E. A., and Walker, A. L.: Directly measured heating rates
of a tropical subvisible cirrus cloud, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J09,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013128" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd013128</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ewald et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Ewald et al.(2021)</label><?label Ewald2021?><mixed-citation>Ewald, F., Groß, S., Wirth, M., Delanoë, J., Fox, S., and Mayer, B.: Why we need radar, lidar, and solar radiance observations to constrain ice cloud microphysics, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5029–5047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5029-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-5029-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Feofilov et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Feofilov et al.(2015)</label><?label Feofilov2015?><mixed-citation>Feofilov, A. G., Stubenrauch, C. J., and Delanoë, J.: Ice water content vertical profiles of high-level clouds: classification and impact on radiative fluxes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12327–12344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12327-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12327-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fusina and Spichtinger(2010)}}?><label>Fusina and Spichtinger(2010)</label><?label Fusina2010?><mixed-citation>Fusina, F. and Spichtinger, P.: Cirrus clouds triggered by radiation, a multiscale phenomenon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5179–5190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5179-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5179-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fusina et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Fusina et al.(2007)</label><?label Fusina2007?><mixed-citation>Fusina, F., Spichtinger, P., and Lohmann, U.: Impact of ice supersaturated
regions and thin cirrus on radiation in the midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D24S14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd008449</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gardner and Sharp(2010)}}?><label>Gardner and Sharp(2010)</label><?label Gardner2010?><mixed-citation>Gardner, A. S. and Sharp, M. J.: A review of snow and ice albedo and the
development of a new physically based broadband albedo parameterization, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, F01009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001444" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jf001444</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gettelman et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Gettelman et al.(2011)</label><?label GettelmanHoorPanEtAl2011?><mixed-citation>Gettelman, A., Hoor, P., Pan, L. L., Randel, W. J., Hegglin, M. I., and Birner,
T.: The extratropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Rev.
Geophys., 49, RG3003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011rg000355" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011rg000355</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Giez et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Giez et al.(2017)</label><?label Giez2017?><mixed-citation>Giez, A., Mallaun, C., Zöger, M., Dörnbrack, A., and Schumann, U.: Static
Pressure from Aircraft Trailing-Cone Measurements and Numerical
Weather-Prediction Analysis, J. Aircraft, 54, 1728–1737,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034084" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2514/1.c034084</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hallar et~al.(2004)}}?><label>Hallar et al.(2004)</label><?label Hallar2004?><mixed-citation>Hallar, A. G., Avallone, L. M., Herman, R. L., Anderson, B. E., and Heymsfield,
A. J.: Measurements of ice water content in tropopause region Arctic cirrus
during the SAGE III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE), J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D17203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004348" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd004348</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{HALO database(2023)}}?><label>HALO database(2023)</label><?label HALOdatabase2023?><mixed-citation>HALO database: POLSTRACC mission data, Mission: POLSTRACC, DLR [data set], <uri>https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/3</uri> (last access: 1 December 2022), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heller(2018)}}?><label>Heller(2018)</label><?label Heller2018?><mixed-citation>Heller, R.: Einfluss von Gebirgswellen auf die Wasserdampfverteilung in der
oberen Troposphäre und unteren Stratosphäre, Ph.D. thesis,
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5282/EDOC.23745" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5282/EDOC.23745</ext-link>, 155,  2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heymsfield et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Heymsfield et al.(2017)</label><?label Heymsfield2017?><mixed-citation>Heymsfield, A. J., Krämer, M., Luebke, A., Brown, P., Cziczo, D. J., Franklin,
C., Lawson, P., Lohmann, U., McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and Tricht,
K. V.: Cirrus Clouds, Meteor. Monogr., 58, 21–226,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0010.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0010.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoinka(1997)}}?><label>Hoinka(1997)</label><?label Hoinka1997?><mixed-citation>Hoinka, K. P.: Die Tropopause: Entdeckung, Definition, Bestimmung, Meteorol.
Z., 6, 281–303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/6/1997/281" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/metz/6/1997/281</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hong and Liu(2015)}}?><label>Hong and Liu(2015)</label><?label Hong2015?><mixed-citation>Hong, Y. and Liu, G.: The Characteristics of Ice Cloud Properties Derived from
Cloud Sat and CALIPSO Measurements, J. Climate, 28, 3880–3901,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00666.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-14-00666.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoose and Möhler(2012)}}?><label>Hoose and Möhler(2012)</label><?label Hoose2012?><mixed-citation>Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Johansson et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Johansson et al.(2019)</label><?label Johansson2019a?><mixed-citation>Johansson, S., Santee, M. L., Grooß, J.-U., Höpfner, M., Braun, M., Friedl-Vallon, F., Khosrawi, F., Kirner, O., Kretschmer, E., Oelhaf, H., Orphal, J., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Tritscher, I., Ungermann, J., Walker, K. A., and Woiwode, W.: Unusual chlorine partitioning in the 2015/16 Arctic winter lowermost stratosphere: observations and simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8311–8338, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8311-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8311-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Joos et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Joos et al.(2014)</label><?label Joos2014?><mixed-citation>Joos, H., Spichtinger, P., Reutter, P., and Fusina, F.: Influence of heterogeneous freezing on the microphysical and radiative properties of orographic cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6835–6852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6835-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6835-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kaufmann et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Kaufmann et al.(2018)</label><?label Kaufmann2018a?><mixed-citation>Kaufmann, S., Voigt, C., Heller, R., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Zöger, M., Giez, A., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Thornberry, T., and Schumann, U.: Intercomparison of midlatitude tropospheric and lower-stratospheric water vapor measurements and comparison to ECMWF humidity data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16729–16745, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Keber et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Keber et al.(2020)</label><?label Keber2020?><mixed-citation>Keber, T., Bönisch, H., Hartick, C., Hauck, M., Lefrancois, F., Obersteiner, F., Ringsdorf, A., Schohl, N., Schuck, T., Hossaini, R., Graf, P., Jöckel, P., and Engel, A.: Bromine from short-lived source gases in the extratropical northern hemispheric upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4105–4132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4105-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4105-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kienast-Sjögren et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Kienast-Sjögren et al.(2016)</label><?label KienastSjoegren2016?><mixed-citation>Kienast-Sjögren, E., Rolf, C., Seifert, P., Krieger, U. K., Luo, B. P., Krämer, M., and Peter, T.: Climatological and radiative properties of midlatitude cirrus clouds derived by automatic evaluation of lidar measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7605–7621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7605-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-7605-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kr\"{a}mer et~al.(2009)}}?><label>Krämer et al.(2009)</label><?label acp-9-3505-2009?><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Bauer, R., Gensch, I., Mangold, A., Schlicht, S., Spelten, N., Sitnikov, N., Borrmann, S., de Reus, M., and Spichtinger, P.: Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3505–3522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Krisch et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Krisch et al.(2020)</label><?label Krisch2020?><mixed-citation>Krisch, I., Ern, M., Hoffmann, L., Preusse, P., Strube, C., Ungermann, J., Woiwode, W., and Riese, M.: Superposition of gravity waves with different propagation characteristics observed by airborne and space-borne infrared sounders, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11469–11490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11469-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11469-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Krisna et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Krisna et al.(2018)</label><?label Krisna2018?><mixed-citation>Krisna, T. C., Wendisch, M., Ehrlich, A., Jäkel, E., Werner, F., Weigel, R., Borrmann, S., Mahnke, C., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Voigt, C., and Machado, L. A. T.: Comparing airborne and satellite retrievals of cloud optical thickness and particle effective radius using a spectral radiance ratio technique: two case studies for cirrus and deep convective clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4439–4462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4439-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-4439-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Krämer et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Krämer et al.(2016)</label><?label Kraemer2016?><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Krämer et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Krämer et al.(2020)</label><?label Kraemer2020?><mixed-citation>Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Fahey, D., Jensen, E., Khaykin, S., Kuhn, T., Lawson, P., Lykov, A., Pan, L. L., Riese, M., Rollins, A., Stroh, F., Thornberry, T., Wolf, V., Woods, S., Spichtinger, P., Quaas, J., and Sourdeval, O.: A microphysics guide to cirrus – Part 2: Climatologies of clouds and humidity from observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12569–12608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kärcher(2018)}}?><label>Kärcher(2018)</label><?label Kaercher2018?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B.: Formation and radiative forcing of contrail cirrus, Nat. Commun.,
9, 1824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kärcher and Jensen(2017)}}?><label>Kärcher and Jensen(2017)</label><?label KAercher2017?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Jensen, E. J.: Microscale characteristics of homogeneous
freezing events in cirrus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2027–2034,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016gl072486</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kärcher and Voigt(2006)}}?><label>Kärcher and Voigt(2006)</label><?label Kaercher2006?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B. and Voigt, C.: Formation of nitric acid/water ice particles in
cirrus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl025927" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl025927</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kärcher et~al.(2009)}}?><label>Kärcher et al.(2009)</label><?label Kaercher2009?><mixed-citation>Kärcher, B., Abbatt, J. P. D., Cox, R. A., Popp, P. J., and Voigt, C.:
Trapping of trace gases by growing ice surfaces including surface-saturated
adsorption, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D13306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd011857</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liou et~al.(2008)}}?><label>Liou et al.(2008)</label><?label Liou2008?><mixed-citation>Liou, K. N., Gu, Y., Yue, Q., and McFarguhar, G.: On the correlation between
ice water content and ice crystal size and its application to radiative
transfer and general circulation models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35,
L13805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl033918" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008gl033918</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Luebke et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Luebke et al.(2013)</label><?label Luebke2013?><mixed-citation>Luebke, A. E., Avallone, L. M., Schiller, C., Meyer, J., Rolf, C., and Krämer, M.: Ice water content of Arctic, midlatitude, and tropical cirrus – Part 2: Extension of the database and new statistical analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6447–6459, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6447-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-6447-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Manney and Lawrence(2016)}}?><label>Manney and Lawrence(2016)</label><?label acp-16-15371-2016?><mixed-citation>Manney, G. L. and Lawrence, Z. D.: The major stratospheric final warming in 2016: dispersal of vortex air and termination of Arctic chemical ozone loss, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15371–15396, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15371-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15371-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Marsing and Meerkötter(2022)}?><label>Marsing and Meerkötter(2022)</label><?label Marsing2022?><mixed-citation>
Marsing, A. and Meerkötter, R.: Radiative transfer calculation results for Arctic cirrus (Version v1), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7387075, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Marsing et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Marsing et al.(2019)</label><?label Marsing2019?><mixed-citation>Marsing, A., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Grooß, J.-U., Kaufmann, S., Heller, R., Engel, A., Hoor, P., Krause, J., and Voigt, C.: Chlorine partitioning in the lowermost Arctic vortex during the cold winter 2015/2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10757–10772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10757-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-10757-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mayer and Kylling(2005)}}?><label>Mayer and Kylling(2005)</label><?label Mayer2005?><mixed-citation>Mayer, B. and Kylling, A.: Technical note: The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations – description and examples of use, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1855–1877, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1855-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1855-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Meyer et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Meyer et al.(2015)</label><?label Meyer2015?><mixed-citation>Meyer, J., Rolf, C., Schiller, C., Rohs, S., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Zöger, M., Sitnikov, N., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Bozóki, Z., Tátrai, D., Ebert, V., Kühnreich, B., Mackrodt, P., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Rosenlof, K. H., and Krämer, M.: Two decades of water vapor measurements with the FISH fluorescence hygrometer: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8521–8538, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8521-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8521-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mitchell et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Mitchell et al.(2018)</label><?label Mitchell2018?><mixed-citation>Mitchell, D. L., Garnier, A., Pelon, J., and Erfani, E.: CALIPSO (IIR–CALIOP) retrievals of cirrus cloud ice-particle concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17325–17354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17325-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17325-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Oelhaf et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Oelhaf et al.(2019)</label><?label Oelhaf2019?><mixed-citation>Oelhaf, H., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Woiwode, W., Bönisch, H., Bozem, H., Engel, A.,
Fix, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Grooß, J.-U., Hoor, P., Johansson, S.,
Jurkat-Witschas, T., Kaufmann, S., Krämer, M., Krause, J., Kretschmer, E.,
Lörks, D., Marsing, A., Orphal, J., Pfeilsticker, K., Pitts, M., Poole, L.,
Preusse, P., Rapp, M., Riese, M., Rolf, C., Ungermann, J., Voigt, C., Volk,
C. M., Wirth, M., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: POLSTRACC: Airborne Experiment
for Studying the Polar Stratosphere in a Changing Climate with the High
Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
100, 2634–2664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-18-0181.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-18-0181.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Payne(1972)}}?><label>Payne(1972)</label><?label Payne1972?><mixed-citation>Payne, R. E.: Albedo of the Sea Surface, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 959–970,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0959:aotss&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0959:aotss&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Perovich and Polashenski(2012)}}?><label>Perovich and Polashenski(2012)</label><?label Perovich2012?><mixed-citation>Perovich, D. K. and Polashenski, C.: Albedo evolution of seasonal Arctic sea
ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L08501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051432" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012gl051432</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pitts et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Pitts et al.(2018)</label><?label Pitts2018?><mixed-citation>Pitts, M. C., Poole, L. R., and Gonzalez, R.: Polar stratospheric cloud climatology based on CALIPSO spaceborne lidar measurements from 2006 to 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10881–10913, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10881-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10881-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sassen et~al.(2008)}}?><label>Sassen et al.(2008)</label><?label Sassen2008?><mixed-citation>Sassen, K., Wang, Z., and Liu, D.: Global distribution of cirrus clouds from
CloudSat/Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations
(CALIPSO) measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00A12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009972" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd009972</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schiller et~al.(1999)}}?><label>Schiller et al.(1999)</label><?label Schiller1999?><mixed-citation>Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Eicke, N., Feigl, C., Fischer, H., Giez, A.,
Konopka, P., Schlager, H., Tuitjer, F., Wienhold, F. G., and Zöger, M.: Ice
particle formation and sedimentation in the tropopause region: A case study
based on in situ measurements of total water during POLSTAR 1997, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 26, 2219–2222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl900337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999gl900337</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schiller et~al.(2002)}}?><label>Schiller et al.(2002)</label><?label Schiller2002?><mixed-citation>Schiller, C., Bauer, R., Cairo, F., Deshler, T., Dörnbrack, A., Elkins, J.,
Engel, A., Flentje, H., Larsen, N., Levin, I., Müller, M., Oltmans, S.,
Ovarlez, H., Ovarlez, J., Schreiner, J., Stroh, F., Voigt, C., and Vömel,
H.: Dehydration in the Arctic stratosphere during the SOLVE/THESEO-2000
campaigns, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd000463</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schiller et~al.(2008)}}?><label>Schiller et al.(2008)</label><?label JGRD:JGRD14934?><mixed-citation>Schiller, C., Krämer, M., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., and Sitnikov, N.: Ice
water content of Arctic, midlatitude, and tropical cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.
Atmos., 113, D24208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010342" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010342</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shupe et~al.(2022)}}?><label>Shupe et al.(2022)</label><?label Shupe2022?><mixed-citation>Shupe, M. D., Rex, M., Blomquist, B., Persson, P. O. G., Schmale, J., Uttal,
T., Althausen, D., Angot, H., Archer, S., Bariteau, L., Beck, I., Bilberry,
J., Bucci, S., Buck, C., Boyer, M., Brasseur, Z., Brooks, I. M., Calmer, R.,
Cassano, J., Castro, V., Chu, D., Costa, D., Cox, C. J., Creamean, J.,
Crewell, S., Dahlke, S., Damm, E., de Boer, G., Deckelmann, H., Dethloff, K.,
Dütsch, M., Ebell, K., Ehrlich, A., Ellis, J., Engelmann, R., Fong, A. A.,
Frey, M. M., Gallagher, M. R., Ganzeveld, L., Gradinger, R., Graeser, J.,
Greenamyer, V., Griesche, H., Griffiths, S., Hamilton, J., Heinemann, G.,
Helmig, D., Herber, A., Heuzé, C., Hofer, J., Houchens, T., Howard, D.,
Inoue, J., Jacobi, H.-W., Jaiser, R., Jokinen, T., Jourdan, O., Jozef, G.,
King, W., Kirchgaessner, A., Klingebiel, M., Krassovski, M., Krumpen, T.,
Lampert, A., Landing, W., Laurila, T., Lawrence, D., Lonardi, M., Loose, B.,
Lüpkes, C., Maahn, M., Macke, A., Maslowski, W., Marsay, C., Maturilli, M.,
Mech, M., Morris, S., Moser, M., Nicolaus, M., Ortega, P., Osborn, J.,
Pätzold, F., Perovich, D. K., Petäjä, T., Pilz, C., Pirazzini, R., Posman,
K., Powers, H., Pratt, K. A., Preußer, A., Quéléver, L.,
Radenz, M., Rabe, B., Rinke, A., Sachs, T., Schulz, A., Siebert, H., Silva,
T., Solomon, A., Sommerfeld, A., Spreen, G., Stephens, M., Stohl, A.,
Svensson, G., Uin, J., Viegas, J., Voigt, C., von der Gathen, P., Wehner, B.,
Welker, J. M., Wendisch, M., Werner, M., Xie, Z., and Yue, F.: Overview of
the MOSAiC expedition: Atmosphere, Elem. Sci. Anth., 10,
1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.2021.00060</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Solomon et~al.(1997)}}?><label>Solomon et al.(1997)</label><?label Solomon1997?><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Borrmann, S., Garcia, R. R., Portmann, R., Thomason, L., Poole,
L. R., Winker, D., and McCormick, M. P.: Heterogeneous chlorine chemistry in
the tropopause region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 21411–21429,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd01525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97jd01525</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Strandgren et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Strandgren et al.(2017)</label><?label Strandgren2017?><mixed-citation>Strandgren, J., Bugliaro, L., Sehnke, F., and Schröder, L.: Cirrus cloud retrieval with MSG/SEVIRI using artificial neural networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3547–3573, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3547-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-3547-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Thackeray and Hall(2019)}}?><label>Thackeray and Hall(2019)</label><?label Thackeray2019?><mixed-citation>Thackeray, C. W. and Hall, A.: An emergent constraint on future Arctic sea-ice
albedo feedback, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 972–978,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0619-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-019-0619-1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Thornberry et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Thornberry et al.(2017)</label><?label Thornberry2017?><mixed-citation>Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Avery, M. A., Woods, S., Lawson, R. P., Bui,
T. V., and Gao, R.-S.: Ice water content-extinction relationships and
effective diameter for TTL cirrus derived from in situ measurements during
ATTREX 2014, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4494–4507,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd025948</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Voigt et~al.(2006)}}?><label>Voigt et al.(2006)</label><?label Voigt2006?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Schlager, H., Ziereis, H., Kärcher, B., Luo, B. P., Schiller, C.,
Krämer, M., Popp, P. J., Irie, H., and Kondo, Y.: Nitric acid in cirrus
clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L05803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005gl025159</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Voigt et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Voigt et al.(2007)</label><?label Voigt2007?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Kärcher, B., Schlager, H., Schiller, C., Krämer, M., de Reus, M., Vössing, H., Borrmann, S., and Mitev, V.: In-situ observations and modeling of small nitric acid-containing ice crystals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3373–3383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3373-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3373-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Voigt et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Voigt et al.(2014)</label><?label VoigtJessbergerJurkatEtAl2014?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Jessberger, P., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Baumann, R., Schlager, H.,
Bobrowski, N., Giuffrida, G., and Salerno, G.: Evolution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the volcanic plumes from Etna, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 2196–2203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058974" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013gl058974</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Voigt et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Voigt et al.(2017)</label><?label Voigt2017a?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Schumann, U., Minikin, A., Abdelmonem, A., Afchine, A., Borrmann,
S., Boettcher, M., Buchholz, B., Bugliaro, L., Costa, A., Curtius, J.,
Dollner, M., Dörnbrack, A., Dreiling, V., Ebert, V., Ehrlich, A., Fix, A.,
Forster, L., Frank, F., Fütterer, D., Giez, A., Graf, K., Grooß, J.-U.,
Groß, S., Heimerl, K., Heinold, B., Hüneke, T., Järvinen, E., Jurkat,
T., Kaufmann, S., Kenntner, M., Klingebiel, M., Klimach, T., Kohl, R.,
Krämer, M., Krisna, T. C., Luebke, A., Mayer, B., Mertes, S., Molleker, S.,
Petzold, A., Pfeilsticker, K., Port, M., Rapp, M., Reutter, P., Rolf, C.,
Rose, D., Sauer, D., Schäfler, A., Schlage, R., Schnaiter, M., Schneider,
J., Spelten, N., Spichtinger, P., Stock, P., Walser, A., Weigel, R.,
Weinzierl, B., Wendisch, M., Werner, F., Wernli, H., Wirth, M., Zahn, A.,
Ziereis, H., and Zöger, M.: ML-CIRRUS: The Airborne Experiment on
Natural Cirrus and Contrail Cirrus with the High-Altitude Long-Range Research
Aircraft HALO, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 271–288,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-15-00213.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-15-00213.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Voigt et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Voigt et al.(2018)</label><?label Voigt2018?><mixed-citation>Voigt, C., Dörnbrack, A., Wirth, M., Groß, S. M., Pitts, M. C., Poole, L. R., Baumann, R., Ehard, B., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Woiwode, W., and Oelhaf, H.: Widespread polar stratospheric ice clouds in the 2015–2016 Arctic winter – implications for ice nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15623–15641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15623-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-15623-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{von Hobe et~al.(2011)}}?><label>von Hobe et al.(2011)</label><?label Hobe2011?><mixed-citation>von Hobe, M., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Konopka, P., Gensch, I., Krämer, M., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Schiller, C., Ulanovsky, A., Sitnikov, N., Shur, G., Yushkov, V., Ravegnani, F., Cairo, F., Roiger, A., Voigt, C., Schlager, H., Weigel, R., Frey, W., Borrmann, S., Müller, R., and Stroh, F.: Evidence for heterogeneous chlorine activation in the tropical UTLS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 241–256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-241-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-241-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wendisch et~al.(2005)}}?><label>Wendisch et al.(2005)</label><?label Wendisch2005?><mixed-citation>Wendisch, M., Pilewskie, P., Pommier, J., Howard, S., Yang, P., Heymsfield,
A. J., Schmitt, C. G., Baumgardner, D., and Mayer, B.: Impact of cirrus
crystal shape on solar spectral irradiance: A case study for subtropical
cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D03202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005294</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wendisch et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Wendisch et al.(2007)</label><?label Wendisch2007?><mixed-citation>Wendisch, M., Yang, P., and Pilewskie, P.: Effects of ice crystal habit on
thermal infrared radiative properties and forcing of cirrus, J. Geophys.
Res., 112, D08201,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007899</ext-link>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wendisch et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Wendisch et al.(2017)</label><?label Wendisch2017?><mixed-citation>Wendisch, M., Brückner, M., Burrows, J., Crewell, S., Dethloff, K., Ebell, K.,
Lüpkes, C., Macke, A., Notholt, J., Quaas, J., Rinke, A., and Tegen, I.:
Understanding Causes and Effects of Rapid Warming in the Arctic, Eos,
98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017eo064803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017eo064803</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wilber et~al.(1999)}}?><label>Wilber et al.(1999)</label><?label Wilber1999?><mixed-citation>Wilber, A. C., Kratz, D. P., and Gupta, S. K.: Surface Emissivity Maps For Use
In Satellite Retrievals Of Longwave Radiation, techreport TP-1999-209362,
NASA Scientific and Technical Information,
<uri>https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19990100634</uri> (last access: 1 December 2022), 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wolf et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Wolf et al.(2018)</label><?label Wolf2018?><mixed-citation>Wolf, V., Kuhn, T., Milz, M., Voelger, P., Krämer, M., and Rolf, C.: Arctic ice clouds over northern Sweden: microphysical properties studied with the Balloon-borne Ice Cloud particle Imager B-ICI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17371–17386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17371-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17371-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{World Meteorological Organization(1957)}}?><label>World Meteorological Organization(1957)</label><?label WMO1957?><mixed-citation>World Meteorological Organization: Meteorology – A Three-Dimensional
Science, WMO Bull., VI, 134–138, <uri>https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=bulletin_display&amp;id=3321</uri> (last access: 1 December 2022), 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zahn et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Zahn et al.(2012)</label><?label Zahn2012?><mixed-citation>Zahn, A., Weppner, J., Widmann, H., Schlote-Holubek, K., Burger, B., Kühner, T., and Franke, H.: A fast and precise chemiluminescence ozone detector for eddy flux and airborne application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 363–375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-363-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-363-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ziereis et~al.(2022)}}?><label>Ziereis et al.(2022)</label><?label Ziereis2022?><mixed-citation>Ziereis, H., Hoor, P., Grooß, J.-U., Zahn, A., Stratmann, G., Stock, P., Lichtenstern, M., Krause, J., Bense, V., Afchine, A., Rolf, C., Woiwode, W., Braun, M., Ungermann, J., Marsing, A., Voigt, C., Engel, A., Sinnhuber, B.-M., and Oelhaf, H.: Redistribution of total reactive nitrogen in the lowermost Arctic stratosphere during the cold winter 2015/2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3631–3654, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3631-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-3631-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Investigating the radiative effect of Arctic cirrus measured in situ during the winter 2015–2016</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Afchine et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Afchine, A., Rolf, C., Costa, A., Spelten, N., Riese, M., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Heller, R., Kaufmann, S., Minikin, A., Voigt, C., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Lawson, P., Lykov, A., Khaykin, S., and Krämer, M.: Ice particle sampling from aircraft – influence of the probing position on the ice water content, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4015–4031, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4015-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4015-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Baum et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Baum, B. A., Yang, P., Heymsfield, A. J., Platnick, S., King, M. D., Hu, Y.-X.,
and Bedka, S. T.: Bulk Scattering Properties for the Remote Sensing of Ice
Clouds. Part II: Narrowband Models, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 1896–1911,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2309.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2309.1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Baum et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Baum, B. A., Yang, P., Nasiri, S., Heidinger, A. K., Heymsfield, A., and Li,
J.: Bulk Scattering Properties for the Remote Sensing of Ice Clouds. Part
III: High-Resolution Spectral Models from 100 to 3250 cm-1, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 46, 423–434, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2473.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2473.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Birner(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Birner, T.: Residual Circulation and Tropopause Structure, J. Atmos. Sci., 67,   2582–2600, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jas3287.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jas3287.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Borrmann et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Borrmann, S., Solomon, S., Dye, J. E., and Luo, B.: The potential of cirrus
clouds for heterogeneous chlorine activation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23,
2133–2136, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96gl01957" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96gl01957</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Braun et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Braun, M., Grooß, J.-U., Woiwode, W., Johansson, S., Höpfner, M., Friedl-Vallon, F., Oelhaf, H., Preusse, P., Ungermann, J., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Ziereis, H., and Braesicke, P.: Nitrification of the lowermost stratosphere during the exceptionally cold Arctic winter 2015–2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13681–13699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13681-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13681-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bucholtz et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Bucholtz, A., Hlavka, D. L., McGill, M. J., Schmidt, K. S., Pilewskie, P.,
Davis, S. M., Reid, E. A., and Walker, A. L.: Directly measured heating rates
of a tropical subvisible cirrus cloud, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J09,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013128" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013128</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Ewald et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Ewald, F., Groß, S., Wirth, M., Delanoë, J., Fox, S., and Mayer, B.: Why we need radar, lidar, and solar radiance observations to constrain ice cloud microphysics, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5029–5047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5029-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5029-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Feofilov et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Feofilov, A. G., Stubenrauch, C. J., and Delanoë, J.: Ice water content vertical profiles of high-level clouds: classification and impact on radiative fluxes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12327–12344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12327-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12327-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Fusina and Spichtinger(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Fusina, F. and Spichtinger, P.: Cirrus clouds triggered by radiation, a multiscale phenomenon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5179–5190, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5179-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5179-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Fusina et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Fusina, F., Spichtinger, P., and Lohmann, U.: Impact of ice supersaturated
regions and thin cirrus on radiation in the midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, D24S14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008449</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Gardner and Sharp(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, A. S. and Sharp, M. J.: A review of snow and ice albedo and the
development of a new physically based broadband albedo parameterization, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, F01009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001444" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001444</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Gettelman et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Gettelman, A., Hoor, P., Pan, L. L., Randel, W. J., Hegglin, M. I., and Birner,
T.: The extratropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Rev.
Geophys., 49, RG3003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011rg000355" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011rg000355</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Giez et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Giez, A., Mallaun, C., Zöger, M., Dörnbrack, A., and Schumann, U.: Static
Pressure from Aircraft Trailing-Cone Measurements and Numerical
Weather-Prediction Analysis, J. Aircraft, 54, 1728–1737,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034084" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034084</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Hallar et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Hallar, A. G., Avallone, L. M., Herman, R. L., Anderson, B. E., and Heymsfield,
A. J.: Measurements of ice water content in tropopause region Arctic cirrus
during the SAGE III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE), J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D17203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004348" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004348</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>HALO database(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
HALO database: POLSTRACC mission data, Mission: POLSTRACC, DLR [data set], <a href="https://halo-db.pa.op.dlr.de/mission/3" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 December 2022), 2023.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Heller(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Heller, R.: Einfluss von Gebirgswellen auf die Wasserdampfverteilung in der
oberen Troposphäre und unteren Stratosphäre, Ph.D. thesis,
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5282/EDOC.23745" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5282/EDOC.23745</a>, 155,  2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Heymsfield et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Heymsfield, A. J., Krämer, M., Luebke, A., Brown, P., Cziczo, D. J., Franklin,
C., Lawson, P., Lohmann, U., McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and Tricht,
K. V.: Cirrus Clouds, Meteor. Monogr., 58, 21–226,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0010.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0010.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Hoinka(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoinka, K. P.: Die Tropopause: Entdeckung, Definition, Bestimmung, Meteorol.
Z., 6, 281–303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/6/1997/281" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/6/1997/281</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Hong and Liu(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, Y. and Liu, G.: The Characteristics of Ice Cloud Properties Derived from
Cloud Sat and CALIPSO Measurements, J. Climate, 28, 3880–3901,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00666.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00666.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hoose and Möhler(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Johansson et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Johansson, S., Santee, M. L., Grooß, J.-U., Höpfner, M., Braun, M., Friedl-Vallon, F., Khosrawi, F., Kirner, O., Kretschmer, E., Oelhaf, H., Orphal, J., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Tritscher, I., Ungermann, J., Walker, K. A., and Woiwode, W.: Unusual chlorine partitioning in the 2015/16 Arctic winter lowermost stratosphere: observations and simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8311–8338, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8311-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8311-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Joos et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Joos, H., Spichtinger, P., Reutter, P., and Fusina, F.: Influence of heterogeneous freezing on the microphysical and radiative properties of orographic cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6835–6852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6835-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6835-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Kaufmann et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufmann, S., Voigt, C., Heller, R., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Zöger, M., Giez, A., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Thornberry, T., and Schumann, U.: Intercomparison of midlatitude tropospheric and lower-stratospheric water vapor measurements and comparison to ECMWF humidity data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16729–16745, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Keber et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Keber, T., Bönisch, H., Hartick, C., Hauck, M., Lefrancois, F., Obersteiner, F., Ringsdorf, A., Schohl, N., Schuck, T., Hossaini, R., Graf, P., Jöckel, P., and Engel, A.: Bromine from short-lived source gases in the extratropical northern hemispheric upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4105–4132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4105-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4105-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Kienast-Sjögren et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kienast-Sjögren, E., Rolf, C., Seifert, P., Krieger, U. K., Luo, B. P., Krämer, M., and Peter, T.: Climatological and radiative properties of midlatitude cirrus clouds derived by automatic evaluation of lidar measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7605–7621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7605-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7605-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Krämer et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Bauer, R., Gensch, I., Mangold, A., Schlicht, S., Spelten, N., Sitnikov, N., Borrmann, S., de Reus, M., and Spichtinger, P.: Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3505–3522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Krisch et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Krisch, I., Ern, M., Hoffmann, L., Preusse, P., Strube, C., Ungermann, J., Woiwode, W., and Riese, M.: Superposition of gravity waves with different propagation characteristics observed by airborne and space-borne infrared sounders, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11469–11490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11469-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11469-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Krisna et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Krisna, T. C., Wendisch, M., Ehrlich, A., Jäkel, E., Werner, F., Weigel, R., Borrmann, S., Mahnke, C., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Voigt, C., and Machado, L. A. T.: Comparing airborne and satellite retrievals of cloud optical thickness and particle effective radius using a spectral radiance ratio technique: two case studies for cirrus and deep convective clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4439–4462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4439-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4439-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Krämer et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Krämer et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Fahey, D., Jensen, E., Khaykin, S., Kuhn, T., Lawson, P., Lykov, A., Pan, L. L., Riese, M., Rollins, A., Stroh, F., Thornberry, T., Wolf, V., Woods, S., Spichtinger, P., Quaas, J., and Sourdeval, O.: A microphysics guide to cirrus – Part 2: Climatologies of clouds and humidity from observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12569–12608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12569-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kärcher(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B.: Formation and radiative forcing of contrail cirrus, Nat. Commun.,
9, 1824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kärcher and Jensen(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B. and Jensen, E. J.: Microscale characteristics of homogeneous
freezing events in cirrus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2027–2034,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072486</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kärcher and Voigt(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B. and Voigt, C.: Formation of nitric acid/water ice particles in
cirrus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl025927" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl025927</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kärcher et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kärcher, B., Abbatt, J. P. D., Cox, R. A., Popp, P. J., and Voigt, C.:
Trapping of trace gases by growing ice surfaces including surface-saturated
adsorption, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D13306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011857</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Liou et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Liou, K. N., Gu, Y., Yue, Q., and McFarguhar, G.: On the correlation between
ice water content and ice crystal size and its application to radiative
transfer and general circulation models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35,
L13805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl033918" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl033918</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Luebke et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Luebke, A. E., Avallone, L. M., Schiller, C., Meyer, J., Rolf, C., and Krämer, M.: Ice water content of Arctic, midlatitude, and tropical cirrus – Part 2: Extension of the database and new statistical analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6447–6459, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6447-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6447-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Manney and Lawrence(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Manney, G. L. and Lawrence, Z. D.: The major stratospheric final warming in 2016: dispersal of vortex air and termination of Arctic chemical ozone loss, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15371–15396, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15371-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15371-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Marsing and Meerkötter(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Marsing, A. and Meerkötter, R.: Radiative transfer calculation results for Arctic cirrus (Version v1), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7387075, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Marsing et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Marsing, A., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Grooß, J.-U., Kaufmann, S., Heller, R., Engel, A., Hoor, P., Krause, J., and Voigt, C.: Chlorine partitioning in the lowermost Arctic vortex during the cold winter 2015/2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10757–10772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10757-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10757-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Mayer and Kylling(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, B. and Kylling, A.: Technical note: The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations – description and examples of use, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1855–1877, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1855-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1855-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Meyer et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Meyer, J., Rolf, C., Schiller, C., Rohs, S., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Zöger, M., Sitnikov, N., Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Bozóki, Z., Tátrai, D., Ebert, V., Kühnreich, B., Mackrodt, P., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Rosenlof, K. H., and Krämer, M.: Two decades of water vapor measurements with the FISH fluorescence hygrometer: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8521–8538, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8521-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8521-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Mitchell et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, D. L., Garnier, A., Pelon, J., and Erfani, E.: CALIPSO (IIR–CALIOP) retrievals of cirrus cloud ice-particle concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17325–17354, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17325-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17325-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Oelhaf et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Oelhaf, H., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Woiwode, W., Bönisch, H., Bozem, H., Engel, A.,
Fix, A., Friedl-Vallon, F., Grooß, J.-U., Hoor, P., Johansson, S.,
Jurkat-Witschas, T., Kaufmann, S., Krämer, M., Krause, J., Kretschmer, E.,
Lörks, D., Marsing, A., Orphal, J., Pfeilsticker, K., Pitts, M., Poole, L.,
Preusse, P., Rapp, M., Riese, M., Rolf, C., Ungermann, J., Voigt, C., Volk,
C. M., Wirth, M., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: POLSTRACC: Airborne Experiment
for Studying the Polar Stratosphere in a Changing Climate with the High
Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
100, 2634–2664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-18-0181.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-18-0181.1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Payne(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Payne, R. E.: Albedo of the Sea Surface, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 959–970,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0959:aotss&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0959:aotss&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Perovich and Polashenski(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Perovich, D. K. and Polashenski, C.: Albedo evolution of seasonal Arctic sea
ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L08501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051432" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051432</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Pitts et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Pitts, M. C., Poole, L. R., and Gonzalez, R.: Polar stratospheric cloud climatology based on CALIPSO spaceborne lidar measurements from 2006 to 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10881–10913, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10881-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10881-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Sassen et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Sassen, K., Wang, Z., and Liu, D.: Global distribution of cirrus clouds from
CloudSat/Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations
(CALIPSO) measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00A12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009972" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009972</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Schiller et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Eicke, N., Feigl, C., Fischer, H., Giez, A.,
Konopka, P., Schlager, H., Tuitjer, F., Wienhold, F. G., and Zöger, M.: Ice
particle formation and sedimentation in the tropopause region: A case study
based on in situ measurements of total water during POLSTAR 1997, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 26, 2219–2222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl900337" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl900337</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Schiller et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Schiller, C., Bauer, R., Cairo, F., Deshler, T., Dörnbrack, A., Elkins, J.,
Engel, A., Flentje, H., Larsen, N., Levin, I., Müller, M., Oltmans, S.,
Ovarlez, H., Ovarlez, J., Schreiner, J., Stroh, F., Voigt, C., and Vömel,
H.: Dehydration in the Arctic stratosphere during the SOLVE/THESEO-2000
campaigns, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000463" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000463</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Schiller et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Schiller, C., Krämer, M., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., and Sitnikov, N.: Ice
water content of Arctic, midlatitude, and tropical cirrus, J. Geophys. Res.
Atmos., 113, D24208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010342" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010342</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Shupe et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Shupe, M. D., Rex, M., Blomquist, B., Persson, P. O. G., Schmale, J., Uttal,
T., Althausen, D., Angot, H., Archer, S., Bariteau, L., Beck, I., Bilberry,
J., Bucci, S., Buck, C., Boyer, M., Brasseur, Z., Brooks, I. M., Calmer, R.,
Cassano, J., Castro, V., Chu, D., Costa, D., Cox, C. J., Creamean, J.,
Crewell, S., Dahlke, S., Damm, E., de Boer, G., Deckelmann, H., Dethloff, K.,
Dütsch, M., Ebell, K., Ehrlich, A., Ellis, J., Engelmann, R., Fong, A. A.,
Frey, M. M., Gallagher, M. R., Ganzeveld, L., Gradinger, R., Graeser, J.,
Greenamyer, V., Griesche, H., Griffiths, S., Hamilton, J., Heinemann, G.,
Helmig, D., Herber, A., Heuzé, C., Hofer, J., Houchens, T., Howard, D.,
Inoue, J., Jacobi, H.-W., Jaiser, R., Jokinen, T., Jourdan, O., Jozef, G.,
King, W., Kirchgaessner, A., Klingebiel, M., Krassovski, M., Krumpen, T.,
Lampert, A., Landing, W., Laurila, T., Lawrence, D., Lonardi, M., Loose, B.,
Lüpkes, C., Maahn, M., Macke, A., Maslowski, W., Marsay, C., Maturilli, M.,
Mech, M., Morris, S., Moser, M., Nicolaus, M., Ortega, P., Osborn, J.,
Pätzold, F., Perovich, D. K., Petäjä, T., Pilz, C., Pirazzini, R., Posman,
K., Powers, H., Pratt, K. A., Preußer, A., Quéléver, L.,
Radenz, M., Rabe, B., Rinke, A., Sachs, T., Schulz, A., Siebert, H., Silva,
T., Solomon, A., Sommerfeld, A., Spreen, G., Stephens, M., Stohl, A.,
Svensson, G., Uin, J., Viegas, J., Voigt, C., von der Gathen, P., Wehner, B.,
Welker, J. M., Wendisch, M., Werner, M., Xie, Z., and Yue, F.: Overview of
the MOSAiC expedition: Atmosphere, Elem. Sci. Anth., 10,
1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00060</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Solomon et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Borrmann, S., Garcia, R. R., Portmann, R., Thomason, L., Poole,
L. R., Winker, D., and McCormick, M. P.: Heterogeneous chlorine chemistry in
the tropopause region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 21411–21429,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd01525" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd01525</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Strandgren et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Strandgren, J., Bugliaro, L., Sehnke, F., and Schröder, L.: Cirrus cloud retrieval with MSG/SEVIRI using artificial neural networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3547–3573, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3547-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3547-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Thackeray and Hall(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Thackeray, C. W. and Hall, A.: An emergent constraint on future Arctic sea-ice
albedo feedback, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 972–978,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0619-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0619-1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Thornberry et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Thornberry, T. D., Rollins, A. W., Avery, M. A., Woods, S., Lawson, R. P., Bui,
T. V., and Gao, R.-S.: Ice water content-extinction relationships and
effective diameter for TTL cirrus derived from in situ measurements during
ATTREX 2014, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4494–4507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025948</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Voigt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Schlager, H., Ziereis, H., Kärcher, B., Luo, B. P., Schiller, C.,
Krämer, M., Popp, P. J., Irie, H., and Kondo, Y.: Nitric acid in cirrus
clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L05803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025159</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Voigt et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Kärcher, B., Schlager, H., Schiller, C., Krämer, M., de Reus, M., Vössing, H., Borrmann, S., and Mitev, V.: In-situ observations and modeling of small nitric acid-containing ice crystals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3373–3383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3373-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3373-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Voigt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Jessberger, P., Jurkat, T., Kaufmann, S., Baumann, R., Schlager, H.,
Bobrowski, N., Giuffrida, G., and Salerno, G.: Evolution of CO<sub>2</sub>,
SO<sub>2</sub>, HCl, and HNO<sub>3</sub> in the volcanic plumes from Etna, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 2196–2203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058974" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058974</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Voigt et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Schumann, U., Minikin, A., Abdelmonem, A., Afchine, A., Borrmann,
S., Boettcher, M., Buchholz, B., Bugliaro, L., Costa, A., Curtius, J.,
Dollner, M., Dörnbrack, A., Dreiling, V., Ebert, V., Ehrlich, A., Fix, A.,
Forster, L., Frank, F., Fütterer, D., Giez, A., Graf, K., Grooß, J.-U.,
Groß, S., Heimerl, K., Heinold, B., Hüneke, T., Järvinen, E., Jurkat,
T., Kaufmann, S., Kenntner, M., Klingebiel, M., Klimach, T., Kohl, R.,
Krämer, M., Krisna, T. C., Luebke, A., Mayer, B., Mertes, S., Molleker, S.,
Petzold, A., Pfeilsticker, K., Port, M., Rapp, M., Reutter, P., Rolf, C.,
Rose, D., Sauer, D., Schäfler, A., Schlage, R., Schnaiter, M., Schneider,
J., Spelten, N., Spichtinger, P., Stock, P., Walser, A., Weigel, R.,
Weinzierl, B., Wendisch, M., Werner, F., Wernli, H., Wirth, M., Zahn, A.,
Ziereis, H., and Zöger, M.: ML-CIRRUS: The Airborne Experiment on
Natural Cirrus and Contrail Cirrus with the High-Altitude Long-Range Research
Aircraft HALO, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 271–288,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-15-00213.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-15-00213.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Voigt et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Voigt, C., Dörnbrack, A., Wirth, M., Groß, S. M., Pitts, M. C., Poole, L. R., Baumann, R., Ehard, B., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Woiwode, W., and Oelhaf, H.: Widespread polar stratospheric ice clouds in the 2015–2016 Arctic winter – implications for ice nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15623–15641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15623-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15623-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>von Hobe et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
von Hobe, M., Grooß, J.-U., Günther, G., Konopka, P., Gensch, I., Krämer, M., Spelten, N., Afchine, A., Schiller, C., Ulanovsky, A., Sitnikov, N., Shur, G., Yushkov, V., Ravegnani, F., Cairo, F., Roiger, A., Voigt, C., Schlager, H., Weigel, R., Frey, W., Borrmann, S., Müller, R., and Stroh, F.: Evidence for heterogeneous chlorine activation in the tropical UTLS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 241–256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-241-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-241-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Wendisch et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Wendisch, M., Pilewskie, P., Pommier, J., Howard, S., Yang, P., Heymsfield,
A. J., Schmitt, C. G., Baumgardner, D., and Mayer, B.: Impact of cirrus
crystal shape on solar spectral irradiance: A case study for subtropical
cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D03202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005294</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Wendisch et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Wendisch, M., Yang, P., and Pilewskie, P.: Effects of ice crystal habit on
thermal infrared radiative properties and forcing of cirrus, J. Geophys.
Res., 112, D08201,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007899</a>, 2007.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Wendisch et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Wendisch, M., Brückner, M., Burrows, J., Crewell, S., Dethloff, K., Ebell, K.,
Lüpkes, C., Macke, A., Notholt, J., Quaas, J., Rinke, A., and Tegen, I.:
Understanding Causes and Effects of Rapid Warming in the Arctic, Eos,
98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017eo064803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017eo064803</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Wilber et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Wilber, A. C., Kratz, D. P., and Gupta, S. K.: Surface Emissivity Maps For Use
In Satellite Retrievals Of Longwave Radiation, techreport TP-1999-209362,
NASA Scientific and Technical Information,
<a href="https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19990100634" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 December 2022), 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Wolf et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Wolf, V., Kuhn, T., Milz, M., Voelger, P., Krämer, M., and Rolf, C.: Arctic ice clouds over northern Sweden: microphysical properties studied with the Balloon-borne Ice Cloud particle Imager B-ICI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17371–17386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17371-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17371-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>World Meteorological Organization(1957)</label><mixed-citation>
World Meteorological Organization: Meteorology – A Three-Dimensional
Science, WMO Bull., VI, 134–138, <a href="https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=bulletin_display&amp;id=3321" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 December 2022), 1957.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Zahn et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Zahn, A., Weppner, J., Widmann, H., Schlote-Holubek, K., Burger, B., Kühner, T., and Franke, H.: A fast and precise chemiluminescence ozone detector for eddy flux and airborne application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 363–375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-363-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-363-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Ziereis et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Ziereis, H., Hoor, P., Grooß, J.-U., Zahn, A., Stratmann, G., Stock, P., Lichtenstern, M., Krause, J., Bense, V., Afchine, A., Rolf, C., Woiwode, W., Braun, M., Ungermann, J., Marsing, A., Voigt, C., Engel, A., Sinnhuber, B.-M., and Oelhaf, H.: Redistribution of total reactive nitrogen in the lowermost Arctic stratosphere during the cold winter 2015/2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3631–3654, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3631-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3631-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
