<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-23-3543-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Seasonal variation of aerosol iron solubility in coarse and fine particles
at an inland city in northwestern China</article-title><alt-title>Seasonal variation of aerosol iron solubility in coarse and fine particles</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Seasonal variation of aerosol iron solubility in coarse and fine particles}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~Zhang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Huanhuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Rui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Chengpeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Xiaofei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>Shuwei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Fu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Tingting</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-9149</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Yizhu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Guohua</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6153-0748</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Yan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Qingcai</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7450-0073</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Ru-jin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Siyu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>Tao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xinming</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-0928</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Mingjin</given-names></name>
          <email>mingjintang@gig.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8756-8445</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Key
Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Longhua Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shenzhen,
Shenzhen, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University
of Science <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>and Technology, Xi'an, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of
Earth Environment, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Mingjin Tang (mingjintang@gig.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>March</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>3543</fpage><lpage>3559</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>November</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>February</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>February</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Huanhuan Zhang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e265">This work investigated seasonal variation of aerosol iron (Fe) solubility for coarse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and fine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) particles
at Xi'an, a megacity in northwestern China impacted by anthropogenic
emission and desert dust. Total Fe concentrations were lowest in summer and were similar in other seasons for coarse particles but lowest in summer and highest in spring for fine particles; for comparison, dissolved Fe
concentrations were higher in fall and winter than spring and summer for coarse particles but highest in winter and lowest in spring and summer
for fine particles. Desert-dust aerosol was always the major source of total Fe for both coarse and fine particles in all four seasons, but it may not be the dominant source of dissolved Fe. Fe solubility was lowest in
spring for both coarse and fine particles and highest in winter for coarse particles and in fall for fine particles. In general, aerosol Fe solubility was found to be higher in air masses originating from local and nearby
regions than those arriving from desert regions after long-distance
transport. Compared to coarse particles, Fe solubility was similar for fine
particles in spring but significantly higher in the other three seasons, and
at a given aerosol pH range, Fe solubility was always higher in fine particles. Aerosol Fe solubility was well correlated with relative abundance
of aerosol acidic species, implying aerosol Fe solubility enhancement by
acid processing; moreover, such correlations were better for coarse
particles than fine particles in all four seasons. Fe solubility was found to increase with relative humidity and acid acidity for both coarse
and fine particles at Xi'an, underscoring the importance of aerosol liquid
water and aerosol acidity in regulating Fe solubility via chemical
processing.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page3544?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e313">Deposition of aerosol particles is a major external source of dissolved iron
(Fe) in many open oceans (Boyd and Ellwood, 2010; Tagliabue et al.,
2017), significantly affecting primary productions in these regions
(Moore et al., 2009; Tang et al., 2021) and thus the global carbon cycle
(Martin, 1990; Jickells et al., 2005). Dissolved Fe has also been
recognized as an important source of reactive oxygen species in aerosol
particles via mechanisms such as the Fenton reaction (Zhang et al., 2008;
Fang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2022) and thus may have adverse impacts on
human health (Kelly, 2003; Abbaspour et al., 2014). In
addition, dissolved Fe could catalyze aqueous oxidation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Martin and Good, 1991; Alexander et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2014),
leading to the formation of sulfate, a major secondary species in aerosol
particles. The various impacts of aerosol Fe are largely determined by its
fractional solubility (often abbreviated as solubility), which is the ratio of dissolved Fe to total Fe.</p>
      <p id="d1e325">Due to the impacts of dissolved aerosol Fe on ocean biogeochemistry and
human health, a number of studies have been conducted in the last 2–3 decades (Chen and Siefert, 2004; Baker and Jickells, 2006; Kumar et al., 2010; Sholkovitz et al., 2012; Mahowald et al., 2018; Meskhidze et al.,
2019; Zhu et al., 2020; Baker et al., 2021; Ito et al., 2021), leading to
significant advances in our knowledge of aerosol Fe solubility and sources
of aerosol-dissolved Fe. For example, many studies (Baker and Jickells, 2006; Sholkovitz et al., 2012) observed the inverse relationship between Fe solubility and total aerosol Fe. It has been recently realized that
non-desert-dust sources, such as anthropogenic emissions and biomass
burning, can be important for dissolved aerosol Fe in many regions
(Sholkovitz et al., 2009; Ito et al., 2019; Hamilton et al., 2020; Liu et
al., 2022), though their contributions to total aerosol Fe are usually
minor. Furthermore, atmospheric aging processes, such as acid processing and
organic complexation, may substantially enhance the solubility of Fe in desert dust and coal fly ash (Paris et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2012; Chen and
Grassian, 2013; Li et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e328">Despite significant progress, it remains difficult for modeling studies to reproduce the wide range of Fe solubility observed for ambient aerosols
(Mahowald et al., 2018; Meskhidze et al., 2019). The relative
contribution of non-desert-dust sources, versus desert dust, to dissolved
aerosol Fe is still rather uncertain (Myriokefalitakis et al., 2018; Ito
et al., 2019). In addition, the impacts of chemical processing (especially
organic complexation) on aerosol Fe solubility have yet to be quantified for ambient aerosols. Further field measurements are needed to reduce the
uncertainties in aerosol Fe solubility in order to better understand the impacts of aerosol Fe on marine biogeochemistry and human health.</p>
      <p id="d1e331">Sources, compositions and physicochemical properties are very different for
coarse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and fine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) particles
(Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016). Therefore, aerosol Fe solubility may
differ significantly and is regulated by different sources or processes for
coarse and fine particles, as found by previous work (Sakata et al.,
2022; Zhang et al., 2022). In addition, both sources and chemical processes
of aerosol particles exhibit significant variability for different seasons,
consequently leading to seasonal variations in aerosol Fe solubility. For
example, desert-dust aerosol mainly occurs in spring at Xi'an, where our present work was conducted, while anthropogenic emission becomes more important in winter (Cao and Cui, 2021); furthermore, higher temperature in summer causes more ammonium to partition into the gas phase and thus leads to higher aerosol acidity (Ding et al., 2019; Zhou et al.,
2022). As a result, examining the seasonal variability of aerosol Fe solubility may provide clues for and insights into factors which regulate Fe
solubility. However, seasonal variation of Fe solubility has only been
explored by a few previous studies (Chen and Siefert, 2004; Tao and
Murphy, 2019; Yang et al., 2020; Yang and Weber, 2022). In the present work,
we investigated seasonal variations of total Fe, dissolved Fe and Fe solubility for fine and coarse particles at Xi'an, a megacity in northwestern China severely affected by anthropogenic emission and desert
dust (Cao and Cui, 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sample collection</title>
      <p id="d1e385">Aerosol sampling in Xi'an took place during 1–30 April 2021 (spring), 12
July to 14 August 2021 (summer), 7 October to 7 November 2021 (fall) and 26 November to 31 December 2020 (winter). Xi'an has a population of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> million and is located in the middle of the Guanzhong
Plain, which is surrounded by the Qin Mountains and the Chinese Loess Plateau (Fig. S1 in the Supplement), favoring accumulation of air pollutants and formation of severe air pollution (Cao and Cui, 2021). In addition, Xi'an is
adjacent to major deserts in China and is thus frequently affected by desert-dust aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e398">Sampling in winter took place at an urban site (34.23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 108.89<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), which is close to a busy major road and is located in residential and commercial areas (Cao et al., 2012), and was carried out on a building roof (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m from the ground) at the Institute
of the Earth's Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Sampling in the other three seasons took place at another urban site (34.37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 108.97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E),
which is located in residential areas (Chen et al.,
2021), and was carried out on a building roof (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m from the ground) at Shaanxi University of Science and Technology. Meteorological parameters (wind speed and direction, temperature and relative humidity) and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations were provided by nearby
environmental monitoring stations.</p>
      <p id="d1e476">Coarse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and fine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) aerosol
particles were collected onto Whatman 41 (W41) cellulose filters on a daily
basis (from 08:00 to 07:30 the next day) using a two-stage aerosol sampler (TH-150C, Tianhong Co., Wuhan, China) with a flow rate of 100 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. W41 filters, which were<?pagebreak page3545?> used for aerosol sampling, were acid-washed to reduce
background levels. After aerosol collection, filters were sealed
individually in clean plastic Petri dishes and then stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for further analysis. Our previous work
(Zhang et al., 2022) described
filter pretreatment, aerosol sampling and filter storage in detail. In the present work, 28, 32, 30 and 36 pairs of filter samples were collected in
spring, summer, fall and winter, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e547">In our work, mass concentrations of various species in air, including
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, are reported under standard state
conditions (at 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 1 atm) to remove the effects of variations in
temperature and atmospheric pressure.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Sample processing and analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e585">Sample analysis was detailed in our previous work (Zhang et al., 2022; Li
et al., 2023), and as a result, here we only provide key information in brief. Every filter was equally halved. The first half-filter, which was
used to determine total Fe, was digested in a Teflon jar using microwave
digestion; after residual acids used in digestion were evaporated, the
Teflon jar was cooled to room temperature and then filled with 20 mL
HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (1 %). The solution was filtered using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane syringe filter (pore size: 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and then analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (iCAP Q, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). In
total, 14 elements were determined, including Fe, Al and Pb, and the recovery rates were found to be 90 %–110 % for Fe using certificated reference
materials (GBW07454 and GSB07-3272-2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e605">The other half-filter, which was used to determine dissolved Fe and soluble ions, was immersed in 20 mL ultrapure water for 2 h, during which an orbital shaker (300 r min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was used to stir the aqueous mixture. After that, the aqueous mixture was filtered using a PTFE membrane syringe filter (pore
size: 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and then divided further into two parts. The first solution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mL) was analyzed by ion chromatography to
measure soluble anions and cations; the second solution (10 mL) was
acidified to contain 1 % HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (using 147 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L 67 % HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and subsequently analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Aerosol acidity calculation</title>
      <p id="d1e676">The ISORROPIA-II model (Fountoukis and Nenes, 2007) was used in the
“metastable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> forward” mode to calculate aerosol pH for coarse and fine
particles, and input data included concentrations of soluble anions
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and cations (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, temperature and relative
humidity (RH). The effects of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(g) were not taken
into account as their concentrations were not measured; this may cause some
biases (likely underestimation) in calculated aerosol pH (Guo et al.,
2015; Hennigan et al., 2015; Pye et al., 2020), but the overall trend of
aerosol pH would not be significantly affected. The reverse mode was not
used in our work, as results calculated using the reverse mode are very
sensitive to uncertainties in concentrations of common aerosol ions
(Hennigan et al., 2015). Coarse particles are
generally expected to be less acidic than fine particles, and it is not
clear yet why similar and even lower aerosol pH was observed for coarse particles (when compared to fine particles) in spring and fall at Xi'an (Fig. S14). This may be caused by biases in aerosol pH calculation, and
lower aerosol pH values were also reported in previous work for coarser
particles carried out in northern Colorado, United States (Young et al., 2013). Concurrent measurements of
gaseous NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCl would help reduce uncertainties in
calculated aerosol pH and have been implemented in our following studies
since July 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Air mass back-trajectory analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e828">The HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory)-4 model (Draxier and Hess, 1998) was employed to calculate 48 h air mass back trajectories using meteorological data (horizontal resolution: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; time resolution: 3 h)
from the Global Data Assimilation System provided by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction. Back trajectories were determined with an arrival
height of 100 m a.g.l. and arrival times of 08:00, 14:00, 20:00 and 02:00 on the next day (Wang et al.,
2020), and every day four back trajectories were obtained. In total, 120, 136, 128 and 144 back trajectories were obtained in our work for spring,
summer, fall and winter, and all the back trajectories were clustered using the cluster analysis method described elsewhere (Baker, 2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e853">Seasonal variations of <bold>(a)</bold> total Fe and <bold>(b)</bold> dissolved Fe
for fine and coarse particles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Total and dissolved aerosol Fe</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Meteorological conditions and aerosol concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e884">The climate in Xi'an (and the Guangzhou Plain in general) is mainly
regulated by the East Asian monsoon. During our campaign, the prevailing wind directions were west and southwest in spring, northeast in summer, southwest
and northeast in fall, and west in winter (Fig. S2); furthermore, average wind speeds were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer and fall and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring and winter. Median temperatures were 13.6, 27.0,
12.7 and 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in spring, summer, fall and winter, and median RH was found to be 85 %, 71 %, 83 % and 77 % (Table S1 in the Supplement). Precipitation mainly took place in summer during our campaign in 2021, similarly to previous years (Cao and Cui, 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e940">Table S2 shows PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at Xi'an in the four seasons. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were in the ranges of 15–243, 24–76, 22–151
and 41–212 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in spring, summer, fall and winter, and the average values were 93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 61, 51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16, 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 and 107 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting<?pagebreak page3546?> the highest levels in spring and winter and
the lowest levels in summer. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations were in the ranges of 11–62, 11–48, 13–97 and 13–156 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the average values were
35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14, 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8, 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 and 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
suggesting the highest concentrations in winter and the lowest levels in summer.</p>
      <p id="d1e1118">PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were high in winter due to
accumulation of anthropogenic pollution, and the median PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio was 0.76. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in spring were significantly
increased due to the impacts of desert-dust aerosol, and the median PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was only 0.44. Two major dust events occurred
during our spring campaign (12–17  and 27–30 April). During the two
dust events the average PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass concentrations were
151 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 57 and 42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios became even lower (0.20–0.31). Furthermore, the median
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were 0.44 in summer and 0.62 in fall.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Total aerosol Fe</title>
      <p id="d1e1311">Figure 1a shows the seasonal variation of total aerosol Fe in coarse and fine particles measured by our work at Xi'an. Total aerosol Fe concentrations
were in the ranges of 270–3095, 191–1992, 395–3492 and 269–3924 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for coarse particles in spring, summer, fall and winter, and the average values were 1504 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 800, 950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 524, 1638 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 830 and 1831 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 866 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table A1 in the Appendix); total aerosol Fe concentrations were in the ranges of 206–12 144, 164–1591, 196–2631 and 257–4268 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for fine particles
in spring, summer, fall and winter, and the average values were 3717 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3387, 721 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 366, 958 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 516 and 2058 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1037 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Average total Fe concentrations were measured to be 798 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 466 and 801 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 534 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for coarse and fine particles in winter
(November–December 2019) at Qingdao
(Zhang et al., 2022), only 44 %
and 38 % of the average values (1831 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 866 and 2058 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1037 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) found in winter (November–December 2020) at Xi'an by the present
work, mainly because during wintertime aerosol mass concentrations were much
higher at Xi'an than Qingdao.</p>
      <p id="d1e1473">The average contributions of coarse particles to total Fe in TSPs (total suspended particles) were 29 %, 57 %, 63 % and 47 % in spring,
summer, fall and winter, being lowest in spring, when the influence of desert-dust aerosol was largest. Statistical analysis (paired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test) suggested that, compared to fine particles, total Fe in coarse particles was
significantly lower in spring (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but significantly higher in summer and fall (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); in addition, there was no significant difference between coarse
and fine particles in winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The average
contributions of coarse particles to total Al in TSPs were 26 %, 50 %, 54 % and 40 % in spring, summer, fall and winter, also being lowest in spring. Furthermore, during dust periods (12–17 and 27–30 April), the average
contribution of coarse particles was found to be 24 % for total Fe and
23 % for total Al in TSPs, even slightly smaller than the average values in spring. This is probably because, for desert-dust aerosol, Fe and Al were enriched in fine particles, while the major component in coarse particles was quartz (Journet et al., 2014); nevertheless, further
measurements are needed to better understand the size distribution of trace metals in desert-dust aerosol.</p>
      <p id="d1e1556">Compared to other seasons, total Fe concentrations in fine and coarse particles were lowest in summer (Fig. 1a), as aerosol mass concentrations were also lowest in summer (Sect. 3.1). Similarly, previous measurements on Huaniao Island in the East China Sea (Yang et al., 2020) and over the tropical and subtropical North Atlantic (Chen and Siefert,
2004) also found the lowest total aerosol Fe levels in summer. For the other three seasons (spring, fall and winter), the total Fe in coarse particles was rather similar, while the total Fe in fine particles was highest in spring and
lowest in fall. Overall, compared to summer and fall, the total aerosol Fe was higher in spring and winter, when higher aerosol mass concentrations were also observed (Fig. S3).</p>
      <?pagebreak page3547?><p id="d1e1559">Total Fe was very well correlated with total Al (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for both coarse (Fig. S4) and fine particles
(Fig. 2) in all four seasons, suggesting desert dust always as the dominant source of total aerosol Fe at Xi'an, regardless of particle size range and seasons. The median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, the mass ratios of total Fe to total
Al, were 0.975, 0.926, 1.269 and 0.940 in spring, summer, fall and winter for coarse particles and 0.735, 0.796, 0.870 and 0.744 for fine particles (Fig. S5). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found to be 0.911 and 0.741 for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generated using surface soil samples collected over several major
deserts in China (Zhang et al., 2014). We found that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured for coarse and fine particles at Xi'an was similar to that reported for desert dust (Zhang et al., 2014); coarse
particles in fall might be one exception (Fig. S5), showing slightly higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (median: 1.269) than desert dust.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1660">Total Fe versus total Al for fine particles in different
seasons: <bold>(a)</bold> spring; <bold>(b)</bold> summer; <bold>(c)</bold> fall; <bold>(d)</bold> winter.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Dissolved aerosol Fe</title>
      <p id="d1e1689">Figure 1b shows the seasonal variation of dissolved aerosol Fe in coarse and fine particles at Xi'an. Dissolved aerosol Fe concentrations were in the
ranges of 1.0–17.5, 0.9–22.0, 0.7–42.2 and 0.9–33.8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for coarse particles in spring, summer, fall and winter, and the average values were
5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5, 5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0, 13.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.2 and 14.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.3 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; dissolved aerosol Fe concentrations were in the ranges of 1.1–21.4, 2.6–22.9, 2.1–33.7 and 5.0–89.5 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for fine particles in
spring, summer, fall and winter, and the average values were 10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5, 9.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.6, 16.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.1 and 22.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Average dissolved Fe concentrations were measured as 7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.5 and
7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for coarse and fine particles in winter at Qingdao
(Zhang et al., 2022), only 53 %
and 32 % of the average values (14.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.3 and 22.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.8 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) found in winter at Xi'an by the present work, and one major
reason is that total Fe concentrations were significantly higher at Xi'an
than Qingdao.</p>
      <p id="d1e1851">The average contributions of coarse particles to dissolved Fe in TSP were 37 %, 36 %, 45 % and 39 % in spring, summer, fall and winter. Compared to fine particles, dissolved Fe was significantly lower in coarse
particles for all four seasons (paired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at Xi'an, although the total Fe in coarse particles was higher than or similar to fine particles (except spring, as discussed in Sect. 3.2). This indicated that aerosol Fe solubility was lower in coarse particles than fine particles, as further discussed in Sect. 4. Similar to our work, Sakata et al. (2022) found that, over the Pacific, dissolved aerosol Fe
concentrations in fine particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) were significantly
higher than coarse particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m).</p>
      <p id="d1e1922">Compared to spring and summer, dissolved Fe concentrations were higher in
fall and winter for coarse particles (Fig. 1b); for fine particles, dissolved Fe concentrations were highest in winter, followed by fall, and lowest in spring and summer. Dissolved Fe concentrations were low in summer,
as total Fe concentrations were also low (Fig. 1a). Total Fe
concentrations were high in spring (Fig. 1a), but dissolved Fe
concentrations were low; this is because, compared to other seasons, spring was most severely affected by desert dust with low Fe solubility. Our
previous study (Zhang et al., 2022)
investigated aerosol Fe at Qingdao in winter and found that, compared to clean days, dissolved Fe concentrations did not change significantly during
dust days, although total Fe concentrations were remarkably increased. Therefore, our previous (Zhang et
al., 2022) and current studies imply that the occurrence of desert-dust aerosol may not necessarily lead to an increase in dissolved Fe concentrations
in the air.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1928">Dissolved Fe versus K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for fine and coarse
particles in different seasons: <bold>(a)</bold> spring; <bold>(b)</bold> summer; <bold>(c)</bold> fall; <bold>(d)</bold> winter. Blue symbols represent fine particles, and brown symbols represent coarse particles. Cross symbols represent data points which are not included
in fittings.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1958">As shown in Fig. S6, overall the correlation between dissolved Fe and
total Al was quite weak at Xi'an, indicating that desert dust may not
contribute dominantly to dissolved aerosol Fe, although it was always the
major source of total aerosol Fe (Sect. 3.2). We also examined
correlations between dissolved Fe and several other species (Table S3).
Except for summer, dissolved Fe was well correlated with secondary inorganic
species (sulfate, nitrate and ammonium) for coarse and fine particles,
suggesting secondary formation (i.e., conversion of insoluble Fe to dissolved Fe via chemical processing) as an important source of dissolved Fe. In addition, Fig. 3 shows that dissolved Fe was well correlated with K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (a tracer
for biomass burning) in coarse and fine particles in all four seasons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and this may indicate biomass burning also as an important source of dissolved aerosol Fe.</p>
      <p id="d1e1998">Furthermore, good correlations with dissolved Fe were found in coarse
particles for Pb, Zn and As in three seasons (spring, fall and winter) and in fine particles for Pb (spring, fall and winter), As (spring and fall) and Zn (fall). Aerosol Pb and Zn are mainly emitted by vehicles and the iron–steel industry (Chow et al., 2004; Cao and Cui, 2021), and the major sources of aerosol As include coal combustion and metal smelting
(Tian et al., 2010). As a result, vehicle
emission, coal combustion, the iron–steel industry and metal smelting also contributed to dissolved aerosol Fe at Xi'an.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Aerosol Fe solubility</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Seasonal variation of Fe solubility</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>Seasonal variability</title>
      <p id="d1e2024">Figure 4 and Table A1 display aerosol Fe solubility at Xi'an in different
seasons. Fe solubility was in the ranges of 0.08 %–2.48 %, 0.13 %–2.44 %, 0.05 %–3.55 % and 0.09 %–7.16 % for coarse particles in spring, summer,
fall and winter, and the median values were 0.38 %, 0.51 %, 0.62 % and 0.79 %; for fine particles, Fe solubility was in the ranges of 0.06 %–1.26 %, 0.34 %–3.02 %, 0.27 %–3.37% and 0.21 %–9.65 % in spring,
summer, fall and winter, and the median values were 0.42 %, 1.35 %, 1.79 % and 1.17 %.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2029">Seasonal variations of aerosol Fe solubility for fine and
coarse particles at Xi'an.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3548?><p id="d1e2038">No significant difference in Fe solubility was found between coarse and fine
particles at Xi'an in spring (paired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In addition, the median values of Fe solubility were both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for
coarse and fine particles in spring, similar to desert dust (Schroth et
al., 2009; Shi et al., 2011b; Oakes et al., 2012b; Li et al., 2022), and
this was because Xi'an was frequently affected by desert-dust aerosol in spring. In the other three seasons (summer, fall and winter), Fe solubility was significantly higher in fine particles than coarse particles
(paired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); furthermore, in these three seasons the median Fe solubility was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for fine
particles and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for coarse particles. For coarse
particles, Fe solubility was highest in winter and lowest in spring, while
no significant difference was found between summer and fall (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); for fine particles, Fe solubility can be
described by the following order: fall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> winter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> spring.</p>
      <p id="d1e2188">A number of field measurements (Hsu et al., 2005; Baker and Jickells,
2006; Sedwick et al., 2007; Kumar et al., 2010; Sholkovitz et al., 2012;
Winton et al., 2015; Shelley et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2023) found inverse
dependence of Fe solubility on total Fe (and Al). As shown in Figs. 5 and
S7, Fe solubility was also observed in our work to decrease with total Fe
for coarse and fine particles in three seasons (spring, summer and winter),
and such dependence can be fitted using Eq. (1):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M174" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(Fe) is Fe solubility, [Fe]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is total Fe concentration, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the sensitivity of Fe solubility to relative change in total
Fe concentration. As shown in Figs. S8–S9, such inverse dependence was
also observed between Fe solubility and total Al in these three seasons.
Several mechanisms can qualitatively explain such inverse dependence, but a
consensus has not been reached yet (Mahowald et al., 2018; Meskhidze et
al., 2019).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2256">Fe solubility versus total Fe for coarse particles in
different seasons: <bold>(a)</bold> spring; <bold>(b)</bold> summer; <bold>(c)</bold> fall; <bold>(d)</bold> winter.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2277">However, no obvious relationship between Fe solubility and total Fe (or
total Al) was found in fall. Such inverse dependence was not found in some previous studies either (Paris et al., 2010; Oakes et al., 2012a) and was found for fine particles but not for coarse particles at Qingdao in the
winter by our previous work (Zhang
et al., 2022). Therefore, one may conclude that the inverse dependence of Fe
solubility on total Fe (or total Al), though frequently observed, is not a
universal rule. It is not clear yet why such inverse dependence was not observed in these studies.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3549?><p id="d1e2280">A larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value means that Fe solubility is more sensitive to a relative change in the total Fe concentration. For our measurements conducted at Xi'an, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were determined to be 0.30, 0.23 and 0.91 in spring, summer and
winter for fine particles (Fig. S7) and 0.52, 0.65 and 1.16 for coarse particles (Fig. 5). One can see that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in winter were much
larger than those in spring and summer for both fine and coarse particles;
furthermore, in each of the three seasons (spring, summer and winter), the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value was larger for coarse particles than fine particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><title>Comparison with previous work</title>
      <p id="d1e2319">The median Fe solubility at Xi'an was 0.79 % and 1.17 % for coarse and fine particles in winter, larger than those (0.34 % and 0.66 %,
respectively) found in winter at Qingdao
(Zhang et al., 2022). One reason is
that in winter Xi'an was frequently affected by haze pollution when aerosol
Fe solubility was significantly increased (Shi et al., 2020; Zhang et
al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2022); in addition, our winter sampling at Qingdao
was severely affected by desert-dust aerosol (Zhang et al., 2022), with very-low Fe solubility.</p>
      <p id="d1e2322">Several previous studies also investigated aerosol Fe solubility in northern
China. Similar to our current work, Chuang et al. (2005) reported low Fe solubility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) for TSPs during spring at Dunhuang, a city in northwestern China. Average Fe solubility at Xi'an was reported to be 10.4 % for TSPs (He et al., 2021) and 25.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.3 % for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lei et al., 2023), 5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8 %,
4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 % and 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 % for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at three cities in
northern China (Zhu et al., 2020) and 2.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.77 % for TSPs at Qingdao (Shi et al., 2020). Compared to our work, some other studies (Shi et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020; He et al., 2021; Lei et al., 2023) reported higher Fe solubility, mainly
because different leaching protocols were employed to extract dissolved Fe
(Meskhidze et al., 2019; Li et al., 2023): (1) sonication was used during extraction in three previous studies (Shi et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020; He et al., 2021), but not in our work; (2) the filter pore size Shi et al. (2020) used (0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) was larger than that our work used (0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m); (3) the leaching solution used by Lei et al. (2023) (acetate buffer, pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3) was more acidic than that we used (ultrapure water).</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3550?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>4.1.3</label><title>Fe solubility during dust and haze events</title>
      <p id="d1e2420">At Xi'an, dust events (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) occurred in spring (12–17 and 27–30
April). During the two dust events, average Fe solubility was 0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 % and 0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 % for coarse and fine particles, similar to that reported for dust particles collected from dust source regions (Shi
et al., 2011b; Oakes et al., 2012b; Paris and Desboeufs, 2013; Li et al.,
2022); during non-dust periods in spring, average Fe solubility was found to
be 0.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.66 % and 0.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27 % for coarse and fine
particles, higher than that observed for dust events. In fact, much lower Fe
solubility was also reported during dust events at Qingdao (Shi et al.,
2020; Zhang et al., 2022), Jeju Island (Chuang et al.,
2005) and Hokkaido (Ooki et al., 2009) when compared to non-dust periods.</p>
      <p id="d1e2518">In this work we classified high-RH haze events as those with
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 and RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %. High-RH haze events at Xi'an only occurred in
winter (26 November–1 December and 5–7 December). Average Fe solubility was measured as 2.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.07 % and 2.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.81 % for coarse and fine particles during high-RH haze events, significantly
higher than that observed for other days in winter (0.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.46 % and
1.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.81 % on average, respectively). Some previous studies
(Shi et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020, 2022; Zhang et al., 2022) also observed evaluated aerosol Fe solubility during haze periods,
attributed to increased contribution of anthropogenic Fe with high
solubility and/or Fe solubility enhancement via chemical processing.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Influence of air mass sources on Fe solubility</title>
      <p id="d1e2635">Back trajectories obtained for our campaign were clustered, and we further
examined the dependence of Fe solubility on air mass cluster types in
different seasons. In spring (Fig. 6a), air mass cluster C1 originated locally, and C2 originated from the North China Plain with severe air pollution, while C3 and C4 represented air mass arriving from desert regions in the
north and northwest after long-distance transport (compared to C1 and C2);
as shown in Fig. 6b, Fe solubility in coarse and fine particles was
significantly higher for C1 and C2 when compared to C3 and C4.</p>
      <p id="d1e2638">In fall (Fig. 6e), air mass cluster C1 originated locally, C2 was transported from desert regions in the north and northwest, and Fe solubility was much higher for C1 than C2 (Fig. 6f). In winter (Fig. 6g), air mass
cluster C1 originated locally, while C2, C3 and C4 originated from desert regions in the north and northwest, and the transport distance increased
from C2 to C4; as shown in Fig. 6h, Fe solubility followed the order C1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C4, decreasing with an increase in transport distance. In contrast to the other three<?pagebreak page3551?> seasons, no obvious dependence of Fe solubility on air mass clusters was found in summer (Fig. 6d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2664">The mean back-trajectory clusters obtained by HYSPLIT for <bold>(a)</bold> spring, <bold>(c)</bold> summer, <bold>(e)</bold> fall, and <bold>(g)</bold> winter; Fe solubility in fine and coarse particles for different air mass clusters in <bold>(b)</bold> spring, <bold>(d)</bold> summer, <bold>(f)</bold> fall, and <bold>(h)</bold> winter. C1–C4 represent different air mass clusters.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2699">To summarize, our work found that, in spring, fall and winter, Fe solubility at Xi'an was significantly higher when air masses originated from local and nearby regions when compared to those arriving from desert
regions after long-distance transport. The reason is that the contribution of anthropogenic emissions to aerosol Fe was elevated for air masses
originating from local and nearby sources (when compared to air masses
originating from desert regions), and anthropogenic aerosol Fe had higher
solubility than desert dust (Schroth et al., 2009; Fu et al., 2012; Oakes
et al., 2012b). Similar to our work, over the Sargasso Sea aerosol Fe solubility was much lower in Saharan air masses than North American air masses (Sedwick et al., 2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Effects of chemical aging</title>
      <p id="d1e2710">Laboratory studies (Shi et al., 2011a; Chen and Grassian, 2013; Wang et
al., 2018) suggested that chemical processing by acids, such as
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, could dissolve insoluble Fe and thus enhance
aerosol Fe solubility. Some field studies found that aerosol Fe solubility
was positively correlated with sulfate and/or nitrate (Shi et al., 2020;
Zhu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2023),
indicating enhancement of Fe solubility by atmospheric acid processing.</p>
      <p id="d1e2740">Figure 7 plots Fe solubility at Xi'an versus (2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [sulfate] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [nitrate]) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [Fe] (in nanomole per nanomole, referred to as relative abundance of aerosol acidic species), the molar ratio of two major acidic species to
total Fe in aerosol particles. For coarse particles, aerosol Fe solubility
was well correlated with relative abundance of aerosol acidic species in all
four seasons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For fine particles, good correlation was found in spring (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
moderate correlation was found in fall and winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and no significant correlation was found in summer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In addition, as shown in Figs. S10–S11, correlations of Fe solubility with [nitrate] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [Fe] were better than
(or very similar to) those with [sulfate] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [Fe] for coarse particles in the four seasons, whereas no obvious trend was observed for fine particles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2886">Fe solubility versus (2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [sulfate] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [nitrate]) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [Fe] for fine and coarse particles in different
seasons: <bold>(a)</bold> spring; <bold>(b)</bold> summer; <bold>(c)</bold> fall; <bold>(d)</bold> winter. Blue symbols represent fine particles, and brown symbols represent coarse particles. Cross
symbols represent data points which are not included in fittings.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2930">Overall, correlations between Fe solubility and relative abundance of
aerosol acidic species were always better for coarse particles than fine
particles (Fig. 7), indicating that acid processing may be more important
in Fe solubility enhancement for coarse particles when compared to fine particles. A previous study (Zhang
et al., 2022) also found that such correlation was better in coarse
particles than fine particles in winter at Qingdao, a coastal city in
northern China. Nevertheless, as discussed in Sect. 4.1, Fe solubility was
higher in fine particles than coarse particles. This may imply that primary
emission of non-desert-dust Fe (anthropogenic Fe) with higher solubility
(Schroth et al., 2009; Oakes et al., 2012b) was more important for Fe
solubility enhancement in fine particles than coarse particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e2933">It was suggested by laboratory studies (Chen and Grassian, 2013; Paris
and Desboeufs, 2013; Wang et al., 2017) that atmospheric organic ligands,
such as oxalate, could increase aerosol Fe solubility via ligand-promoted
dissolution. As shown in Fig. S12, our present work found good correlation
between Fe solubility with [oxalate] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [Fe] (in nanomole per nanomole) for coarse particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and moderate
correlation for fine particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at Xi'an. Positive correlation between Fe solubility and oxalate was
also observed previously in Atlanta, USA (Yang and Weber, 2022), Toronto, Canada (Tao et al., 2022), and Qingdao, China (Zhang et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e2999">We note that good correlation between Fe solubility and aerosol oxalate does
not necessarily mean Fe solubility enhancement by Fe–oxalate complexation. For example, it was suggested that Fe could promote the formation of oxalate
in aerosol particles (Tao and Murphy, 2019; Zhang et al., 2019), and thus
good correlation between Fe solubility and oxalate could also imply enhanced
formation of oxalate by dissolved Fe. In addition, similar to sulfate and nitrate, the major source of oxalate in the troposphere was secondary formation (Myriokefalitakis et al., 2011; Kawamura and Bikkina, 2016),
and in this aspect good correlation between Fe solubility and relative
abundance of oxalate could also indicate the importance of secondary
formation of dissolved aerosol Fe (i.e., dissolution of insoluble Fe to dissolved Fe via aging processes).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion: roles of RH and aerosol acidity</title>
      <p id="d1e3012">Figure 8 reveals the importance of RH in regulating aerosol Fe solubility.
When RH was increased from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to 60 %–70 %, a significant increase in Fe solubility was observed for both coarse and fine particles.
Sun et al. (2018) investigated hygroscopicity of aerosol particles collected
in northern China and found that most particles examined started to become deliquesced when RH was increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. The
deliquescenced RH reported for ambient aerosol particles (Sun et al., 2018) coincided roughly with the RH
threshold at which a large increase in aerosol Fe solubility was observed in our work. Previous studies (Shi et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020, 2022) also highlighted that RH and thus aerosol liquid water could
substantially affect Fe solubility. For example, Zhu et al. (2020) measured Fe solubility at four cities in eastern China in December 2017 and found that Fe solubility at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % RH was significantly larger than
that at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % RH.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3057">Fe solubility in different RH (relative humidity) ranges
for fine and coarse particles (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 %: 18 d; 60 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 %: 23 d; 70 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 %: 48 d; 80 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 %: 28 d; RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 %: 10 d).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3553?><p id="d1e3123">In addition, as shown in Fig. 8, when RH was increased from 80 %–90 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, median Fe solubility remarkably increased from 0.67 % to 1.68 % for coarse particles. Similarly to our work, Shi et al. (2020) also found that aerosol Fe solubility at Qingdao was significantly
increased under foggy weather when compared to other weather conditions.
Therefore, both Shi et al. (2020) and our present work suggested that high
RH could promote Fe dissolution.</p>
      <p id="d1e3137">We further examined the impact of aerosol acidity on Fe solubility, and the
results are displayed in Fig. 9. For coarse particles, an increase in pH did not lead to an apparent change in Fe solubility as long as aerosol pH was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, Fe solubility was greatly decreased when aerosol pH
was increased to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For fine particles, Fe solubility in
general decreased with increasing aerosol pH (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Previous work carried out at six Canadian sites
(Tao and Murphy, 2019) and Atlanta, USA (Wong et al., 2020;
Yang and Weber, 2022), also reported higher Fe solubility at lower aerosol pH. Similar to our previous work at Qingdao in the winter (Zhang et al., 2022), our current study found that, for coarse and fine particles at Xi'an, aerosol pH was mostly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when Fe solubility exceeded 1 % (Fig. S13). It should
be pointed out that for some samples collected at Xi'an, Fe solubility could
still be very low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), even when aerosol pH was low and RH was high (Fig. S13). In total, 34 samples for coarse particles (9 in spring, 8 in summer, 12 in fall and 5 in winter) and 18 samples for fine particles (7 in spring, 6 in summer, 4 in fall and 1 in winter) fulfilled the above
conditions (pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4, RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 % and Fe solubility <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Fe mineralogy may possibly explain the observed low Fe
solubility<?pagebreak page3554?> despite high RH and aerosol acidity, and concurrent measurements
of Fe mineralogy could provide further clues.</p>
      <p id="d1e3225">In addition, as shown in Fig. 9, at a given pH range, Fe solubility was always higher in fine particles than coarse particles. If we assume at the
same pH range that Fe solubility enhancement by acid processing was similar for fine and coarse particles, the results displayed in Fig. 9 may imply that
anthropogenic and pyrogenic Fe played a more important role in Fe solubility
enhancement in fine particles at Xi'an when compared to coarse particles. Mcdaniel et al. (2019) found that soluble Fe concentration
was strongly correlated with aerosol surface area for size-resolved aerosol
samples collected from several different regions and suggested surface area as the main factor which affected Fe solubility; they further suggested that
this was because Fe solubility enhancement by acid processing could be more
effective for aerosol particles with larger surface areas and thus smaller particle sizes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3230">Fe solubility in different pH ranges for fine and coarse
particles at Xi'an.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/3543/2023/acp-23-3543-2023-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3239">Our work found that at Xi'an aerosol pH values for both coarse and fine
particles were lower (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in summer and fall than in spring and winter (Table S4 and Fig. S14). Compared to summer and fall, lower temperature in winter favored partitioning of ammonium in aerosol particles and thus led to higher aerosol pH. Average
temperatures were similar in spring and fall at Xi'an (Table S1), but aerosol pH was higher in spring than in fall (Table S4). Higher aerosol pH in spring at Xi'an, when compared to fall, was caused by an increase in non-volatile cations in spring due to the influence of desert-dust aerosol; in fact, we found that the abundance of Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (relative to sulfate) was
much higher in spring for both fine and coarse particles. Meanwhile, Fe
solubility was higher in summer (median: 1.35 %) and fall (median: 1.79 %) than in spring (median: 0.42 %) and winter (median: 1.17 %) for fine particles and was also higher in summer (median: 0.51 %) and fall (median: 0.62 %) than in spring (median: 0.38 %) for coarse particles. As a result, lower aerosol pH (and thus higher aerosol acidity) in summer and fall may at least partly explain the observed higher Fe solubility in these two
seasons. Our results were corroborated by a previous study (Yang
and Weber, 2022), which found that, compared to the cold season, higher Fe solubility was found in Atlanta (Georgia, USA) in the warm season when aerosol pH was lower.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Summary and conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e3293">Our work investigated total Fe, dissolved Fe and Fe solubility for coarse
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and fine (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) particles in four
different seasons at Xi'an, a megacity in northwestern China impacted by
anthropogenic emissions and desert dust. Total Fe concentrations in coarse
particles were lowest in summer and similar in the other three seasons,
while for fine particles total Fe concentrations were lowest in summer and
highest in spring. Good correlations were found between total Fe and total
Al for both coarse and fine particles in all four seasons, suggesting desert-dust aerosol as the major source of total Fe regardless of particle size (below or above 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and season.</p>
      <p id="d1e3340">Dissolved Fe concentrations were higher in fall and winter than in spring and summer for coarse particles; for fine particles, dissolved Fe concentrations were highest in winter, followed by fall, and lowest in spring and summer. Compared to the other seasons, although total Fe concentrations were evaluated in spring due to the impacts of desert dust, an increase in dissolved Fe levels
was not observed. This may imply that the occurrence of desert-dust aerosol may not necessarily lead to an increase in dissolved Fe concentrations, as also revealed in our previous study
(Zhang et al., 2022) carried out at a coastal city in northern China. Dissolved Fe was significantly lower for coarse particles (compared to fine particles) in all four seasons, although the total Fe in coarse particles was higher than or similar to fine
particles in three seasons (but not spring), implying higher Fe solubility
in fine particles. Overall, the correlation between dissolved Fe and total Al was rather weak, suggesting that desert dust may not contribute dominantly
to dissolved Fe at Xi'an, although it was always the major source of total
Fe.</p>
      <p id="d1e3343">The highest Fe solubility was observed in winter for coarse particles and in fall for fine particles; meanwhile, the lowest Fe solubility was observed in spring for both coarse and fine particles, with the median Fe solubility below 0.5 %. Compared to coarse particles, Fe solubility was similar for
fine particles in spring but significantly higher in the other three
seasons. Inverse dependence of Fe solubility on total Fe concentration was
observed for coarse and fine particles in spring, summer and winter, while
there was no such dependence for either fine or coarse particles in fall. Furthermore, aerosol Fe solubility was higher in air masses originating from
local and nearby regions than those arriving from desert regions after
long-distance transport in three seasons<?pagebreak page3555?> (spring, fall and winter), while no apparent dependence of Fe solubility on air mass origins was found in
summer.</p>
      <p id="d1e3346">Our work found better correlation between Fe solubility and relative
abundance of aerosol acidic species for coarse particles than fine particles
in all four seasons, probably suggesting that acid processing was more important for Fe solubility enhancement in coarse particles. This may
further mean that non-desert-dust Fe (e.g., anthropogenic and biomass
burning Fe) was more important for Fe solubility enhancement in fine
particles, since Fe solubility was higher in fine particles than coarse
particles. We also found that overall Fe solubility increased with RH and
acid acidity for coarse and fine particles, underscoring the importance of aerosol liquid water and aerosol acidity in enhancing Fe solubility via acid processing. Our work further found that at a given pH range aerosol Fe
solubility was always higher in fine particles than coarse particles.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title/>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T1"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d1e3363">Overview of total Fe (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, dissolved Fe (ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe solubility (%) for fine and coarse particles in different seasons at Xi'an.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Fine particles </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">Coarse particles </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">206–12 144</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2925</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3717 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3387</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">270–3095</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1626</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1504 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 800</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dissolved Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.1–21.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0–17.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe solubility</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.06–1.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.08–2.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">164–1591</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">719</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">721 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 366</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">191–1992</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">942</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 524</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dissolved Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.6–22.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9–22.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe solubility</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.3–3.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.13–2.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fall</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">196–2631</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">934</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">958 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 516</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">395–3492</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1651</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1638 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 830</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dissolved Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.1–33.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7–42.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe solubility</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.27–3.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05–3.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Average</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">257–4268</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1942</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2058 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1037</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">269–3924</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1850</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1831 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 866</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dissolved Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.0–89.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9–33.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe solubility</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.21–9.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.09–7.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4009">Data are available upon request (Mingjin Tang: mingjintang@gig.ac.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4012">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3543-2023-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3543-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4021">HZ: investigation, formal analysis, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing; RL: investigation, writing – original draft; CH: investigation; XL: investigation; SD: investigation; FW: investigation; TL: investigation; YC: investigation; GZ: resource, writing – review and editing; YR: resource; QC: resource;
RH: resource; SC: writing – review and editing; XW: resource; MT:
conceptualization, formal analysis, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4027">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4033">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4039">We would like to thank Shiguo Jia at Sun Yat-sen University for
assistance in air mass back-trajectory analysis.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4045">This work was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42022050 and 42277088), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
(2021M703222), the Guangdong Foundation for the Program of Science and Technology Research (2020B1212060053), Guangdong Province (2017GC010501) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Pioneer Hundred Talents program.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4051">This paper was edited by Theodora Nah and reviewed by Weijun Li and two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Abbaspour, N., Hurrell, R., and Kelishadi, R.: Review on iron and its
importance for human health, J. Res. Med. Sci., 19, 164–174, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Gong, S. L.: Transition
metal-catalyzed oxidation of atmospheric sulfur: Global implications for the
sulfur budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D02309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.01029/02008jd010486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.01029/02008jd010486</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baker, A. R. and Jickells, T. D.: Mineral particle size as a control on
aerosol iron solubility, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11029/12006GL026557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.11029/12006GL026557</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baker, A. R., Kanakidou, M., Nenes, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Croot, P. L.,
Duce, R. A., Gao, Y., Guieu, C., Ito, A., Jickells, T. D., Mahowald, N. M.,
Middag, R., Perron, M. M. G., Sarin, M. M., Shelley, R., and Turner, D. R.:
Changing atmospheric acidity as a modulator of nutrient deposition and ocean
biogeochemistry, Sci. Adv., 7, eabd8800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd8800" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abd8800</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Baker, J.: A cluster analysis of long range air transport pathways and
associated pollutant concentrations within the UK, Atmos. Environ., 44,
563–571, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W. and Ellwood, M. J.: The biogeochemical cycle of iron in the
ocean, Nat. Geosci., 3, 675–682, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cao, J. J. and Cui, L.: Current Status, Characteristics and Causes of
Particulate Air Pollution in the Fenwei Plain, China: A Review, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos, 126, e2020JD034472,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034472" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD034472</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cao, J. J., Wang, Q. Y., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Tie, X. X., Shen, Z.
X., Wang, P., and An, Z. S.: Impacts of aerosol compositions on visibility
impairment in Xi'an, China, Atmos. Environ., 59, 559–566, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chen, H. H. and Grassian, V. H.: Iron Dissolution of Dust Source Materials
during Simulated Acidic Processing: The Effect of Sulfuric, Acetic, and
Oxalic Acids, Environ. Sci. Tech., 47, 10312–10321, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. and Siefert, R. L.: Seasonal and spatial distributions and dry
deposition fluxes of atmospheric total and labile iron over the tropical and
subtropical North Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 109, D09305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.01029/02003JD003958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.01029/02003JD003958</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q. C., Hua, X. Y., Li, J. W., Chang, T., and Wang, Y. Q.: Diurnal
evolutions and sources of water-soluble chromophoric aerosols over Xi'an
during haze event, in Northwest China, Sci. Total Environ., 786, 147412,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147412" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147412</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Kuhns, H., Etyemezian, V., Lowenthal, D. H.,
Crow, D., Kohl, S. D., Engelbrecht, J. P., and Green, M. C.: Source profiles
for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol
Visibility and Observational study, Chemosphere, 54, 185–208, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chuang, P. Y., Duvall, R. M., Shafer, M. M., and Schauer, J. J.: The origin
of water soluble particulate iron in the Asian atmospheric outflow, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, L07813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.01029/02004GL021946" ext-link-type="DOI">10.01029/02004GL021946</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ding, J., Zhao, P., Su, J., Dong, Q., Du, X., and Zhang, Y.: Aerosol pH and its driving factors in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7939–7954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7939-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7939-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Draxier, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4
modelling system for trajectories, dispersion and deposition, Aust.
Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fang, T., Guo, H. Y., Zeng, L. H., Verma, V., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.:
Highly Acidic Ambient Particles, Soluble Metals, and Oxidative Potential: A
Link between Sulfate and Aerosol Toxicity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
2611–2620, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3557?><ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fu, H. B., Lin, J., Shang, G. F., Dong, W. B., Grassian, V. H., Carmichael,
G. R., Li, Y., and Chen, J. M.: Solubility of Iron from Combustion Source
Particles in Acidic Media Linked to Iron Speciation, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
46, 11119–11127, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Xu, L., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M., Capps, S. L., Hite Jr., J. R., Carlton, A. G., Lee, S.-H., Bergin, M. H., Ng, N. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine-particle water and pH in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5211–5228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hamilton, D. S., Scanza, R. A., Rathod, S. D., Bond, T. C., Kok, J. F., Li,
L., Matsui, H., and Mahowald, N. M.: Recent (1980 to 2015) Trends and
Variability in Daily-to-Interannual Soluble Iron Deposition from Dust, Fire,
and Anthropogenic Sources, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089688, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089688" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL089688</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>He, X., Liu, P., Zhao, W., Xu, H., Zhang, R., and Shen, Z.: Size
distribution of water-soluble metals in atmospheric particles in Xi'an,
China: Seasonal variations, bioavailability, and health risk assessment,
Atmos. Poll. Res., 12, 101090,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2021.101090</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hsu, S.-C., Lin, F.-J., and Jeng, W.-L.: Seawater solubility of natural and
anthropogenic metals within ambient aerosols collected from Taiwan coastal
sites, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3989–4001, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Huang, X., Song, Y., Zhao, C., Li, M., Zhu, T., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.:
Pathways of sulfate enhancement by natural and anthropogenic mineral
aerosols in China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 119, 14165–14179, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ito, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Kanakidou, M., Mahowald, N. M., Scanza, R.
A., Hamilton, D. S., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T., Sarin, M., Bikkina, S.,
Gao, Y., Shelley, R. U., Buck, C. S., Landing, W. M., Bowie, A. R., Perron,
M. M. G., Guieu, C., Meskhidze, N., Johnson, M. S., Feng, Y., Kok, J. F.,
Nenes, A., and Duce, R. A.: Pyrogenic iron: The missing link to high iron
solubility in aerosols, Sci. Adv., 5, eaau7671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7671" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aau7671</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ito, A., Ye, Y., Baldo, C., and Shi, Z. B.: Ocean fertilization by pyrogenic
aerosol iron, Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 4, 30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-41021-00185-41618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-41021-00185-41618</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jickells, T. D., An, Z. S., Andersen, K. K., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G.,
Brooks, N., Cao, J. J., Boyd, P. W., Duce, R. A., Hunter, K. A., Kawahata,
H., Kubilay, N., laRoche, J., Liss, P. S., Mahowald, N., Prospero, J. M.,
Ridgwell, A. J., Tegen, I., and Torres, R.: Global Iron Connections between
Desert Dust, Ocean Biogeochemistry, and Climate, Science, 308, 67–71, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Journet, E., Balkanski, Y., and Harrison, S. P.: A new data set of soil mineralogy for dust-cycle modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3801–3816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3801-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3801-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kawamura, K. and Bikkina, S.: A review of dicarboxylic acids and related
compounds in atmospheric aerosols: Molecular distributions, sources and
transformation, Atmos. Res., 170, 140–160, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kelly, F. J.: Oxidative stress: Its role in air pollution and adverse health
effects, Occup. Environ. Med., 60, 612–616, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kumar, A., Sarin, M. M., and Srinivas, B.: Aerosol iron solubility over Bay
of Bengal: Role of anthropogenic sources and chemical processing, Mar.
Chem., 121, 167–175, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lei, Y., Li, D., Lu, D., Zhang, T., Sun, J., Wang, X., Xu, H., and Shen, Z.:
Insights into the roles of aerosol soluble iron in secondary aerosol
formation, Atmos. Environ., 294, 119507,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119507</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, R., Zhang, H. H., Wang, F., He, Y. T., Huang, C. P., Luo, L., Dong, S.
W., Jia, X. H., and Tang, M. J.: Mass fractions, solubility, speciation and
isotopic compositions of iron in coal and municipal waste fly ash, Sci.
Total Environ., 838, 155974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155974" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155974</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, R., Dong, S. W., Huang, C. P., Yu, F., Wang, F., Li, X. F., Zhang, H.
H., Ren, Y., Guo, M. X., Chen, Q. C., Ge, B. Z., and Tang, M. J.: Evaluating
the effects of contact time and leaching solution on measured solubilities
of aerosol trace metals, Appl. Geochem., 148, 105551, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105551</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, W. J., Xu, L., Liu, X. H., Zhang, J. C., Lin, Y. T., Yao, X. H., Gao, H.
W., Zhang, D. Z., Chen, J. M., Wang, W. X., Harrison, R. M., Zhang, X. Y.,
Shao, L. Y., Fu, P. Q., Nenes, A., and Shi, Z. B.: Air pollution–aerosol
interactions produce more bioavailable iron for ocean ecosystems, Science
Adv., 3, e1601749, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601749" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.1601749</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liu, L., Lin, Q., Liang, Z., Du, R., Zhang, G., Zhu, Y., Qi, B., Zhou, S.,
and Li, W.: Variations in concentration and solubility of iron in
atmospheric fine particles during the COVID-19 pandemic: An example from
China, Gondwana Res., 97, 138–144, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liu, M. X., Matsui, H., Hamilton, D. S., Lamb, K. D., Rathod, S. D.,
Schwarz, J. P., and Mahowald, N. M.: The underappreciated role of
anthropogenic sources in atmospheric soluble iron flux to the Southern
Ocean, Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 5, 28,
10.1038/s41612-022-00250-w, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N. M., Hamilton, D. S., Mackey, K. R. M., Moore, J. K., Baker, A.
R., Scanza, R. A., and Zhang, Y.: Aerosol trace metal leaching and impacts
on marine microorganisms, Nat. Commun., 9, 2614, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04970-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-04970-7</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martin, J. H.: Glacial-interglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change: the iron hypothesis,
Paleoceanography, 5, 1–13, 1990.
Martin, L. R. and Good, T. W.: Catalyzed oxidation of sulfur dioxide in
solution: The iron-manganese synergism, Atmos. Environ., 25, 2395–2399,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
McDaniel, M. F. M., Ingall, E. D., Morton, P. L., Castorina, E., Weber, R.
J., Shelley, R. U., Landing, W. M., Longo, A. F., Feng, Y., and Lai, B.:
Relationship between Atmospheric Aerosol Mineral Surface Area and Iron
Solubility, ACS Earth  Space Chem., 3, 2443–2451, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Meskhidze, N., Volker, C., Al-Abadleh, H. A., Barbeau, K., Bressac, M.,
Buck, C., Bundy, R. M., Croot, P., Feng, Y., Ito, A., Johansen, A. M.,
Landing, W. M., Mao, J. Q., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ohnemus, D., Pasquier, B.,
and Ye, Y.: Perspective on identifying and characterizing the processes
controlling iron speciation and residence time at the atmosphere-ocean
interface, Mar. Chem., 217, 103704, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Moore, C. M., Mills, M. M., Achterberg, E. P., Geider, R. J., LaRoche, J.,
Lucas, M. I., McDonagh, E. L., Pan, X., Poulton, A. J., Rijkenberg, M. J.
A., Suggett, D. J., Ussher, S. J., and Woodward, E. M. S.: Large-scale
distribution of Atlantic nitrogen fixation controlled by iron availability,
Nat. Geosci., 2, 867–871, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3558?><ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Myriokefalitakis, S., Ito, A., Kanakidou, M., Nenes, A., Krol, M. C., Mahowald, N. M., Scanza, R. A., Hamilton, D. S., Johnson, M. S., Meskhidze, N., Kok, J. F., Guieu, C., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T. D., Sarin, M. M., Bikkina, S., Shelley, R., Bowie, A., Perron, M. M. G., and Duce, R. A.: Reviews and syntheses: the GESAMP atmospheric iron deposition model intercomparison study, Biogeosciences, 15, 6659–6684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Myriokefalitakis, S., Tsigaridis, K., Mihalopoulos, N., Sciare, J., Nenes, A., Kawamura, K., Segers, A., and Kanakidou, M.: In-cloud oxalate formation in the global troposphere: a 3-D modeling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5761–5782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5761-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5761-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oakes, M., Weber, R. J., Lai, B., Russell, A., and Ingall, E. D.: Characterization of iron speciation in urban and rural single particles using XANES spectroscopy and micro X-ray fluorescence measurements: investigating the relationship between speciation and fractional iron solubility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 745–756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-745-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-745-2012</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Oakes, M., Ingall, E. D., Lai, B., Shafer, M. M., Hays, M. D., Liu, Z. G.,
Russell, A. G., and Weber, R. J.: Iron Solubility Related to Particle Sulfur
Content in Source Emission and Ambient Fine Particles, Environ. Sci.
Tech., 46, 6637–6644, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ooki, A., Nishioka, J., Ono, T., and Noriki, S.: Size dependence of iron
solubility of Asian mineral dust particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 114,
D03202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.01029/02008JD010804" ext-link-type="DOI">10.01029/02008JD010804</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paris, R. and Desboeufs, K. V.: Effect of atmospheric organic complexation on iron-bearing dust solubility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4895–4905, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4895-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4895-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Paris, R., Desboeufs, K. V., and Journet, E.: Variability of dust iron
solubility in atmospheric waters: Investigation of the role of oxalate
organic complexation, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6510–6517, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paris, R., Desboeufs, K. V., Formenti, P., Nava, S., and Chou, C.: Chemical characterisation of iron in dust and biomass burning aerosols during AMMA-SOP0/DABEX: implication for iron solubility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4273–4282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4273-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4273-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Alexander, B., Ault, A. P., Barth, M. C., Clegg, S. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Fahey, K. M., Hennigan, C. J., Herrmann, H., Kanakidou, M., Kelly, J. T., Ku, I.-T., McNeill, V. F., Riemer, N., Schaefer, T., Shi, G., Tilgner, A., Walker, J. T., Wang, T., Weber, R., Xing, J., Zaveri, R. A., and Zuend, A.: The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4809–4888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sakata, K., Kurisu, M., Takeichi, Y., Sakaguchi, A., Tanimoto, H., Tamenori, Y., Matsuki, A., and Takahashi, Y.: Iron (Fe) speciation in size-fractionated aerosol particles in the Pacific Ocean: The role of organic complexation of Fe with humic-like substances in controlling Fe solubility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9461–9482, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9461-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-9461-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schroth, A. W., Crusius, J., Sholkovitz, E. R., and Bostick, B. C.: Iron
solubility driven by speciation in dust sources to the ocean, Nat.
Geosci., 2, 337–340, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sedwick, P. N., Sholkovitz, E. R., and Church, T. M.: Impact of
anthropogenic combustion emissions on the fractional solubility of aerosol
iron: Evidence from the Sargasso Sea, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 8, Q10Q06,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GC001586</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change (Third edition), Wiley Interscience, New
York, ISBN 978-1-118-94740-1, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shelley, R. U., Landing, W. M., Ussher, S. J., Planquette, H., and Sarthou, G.: Regional trends in the fractional solubility of Fe and other metals from North Atlantic aerosols (GEOTRACES cruises GA01 and GA03) following a two-stage leach, Biogeosciences, 15, 2271–2288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2271-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-2271-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shi, J. H., Guan, Y., Ito, A., Gao, H. W., Yao, X. H., Baker, A. R., and
Zhang, D. Z.: High Production of Soluble Iron Promoted by Aerosol
Acidification in Fog, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086124,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl086124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019gl086124</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shi, Z., Bonneville, S., Krom, M. D., Carslaw, K. S., Jickells, T. D., Baker, A. R., and Benning, L. G.: Iron dissolution kinetics of mineral dust at low pH during simulated atmospheric processing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 995–1007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-995-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-995-2011</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shi, Z. B., Woodhouse, M. T., Carslaw, K. S., Krom, M. D., Mann, G. W., Baker, A. R., Savov, I., Fones, G. R., Brooks, B., Drake, N., Jickells, T. D., and Benning, L. G.: Minor effect of physical size sorting on iron solubility of transported mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8459–8469, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8459-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8459-2011</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shi, Z. B., Krom, M. D., Jickells, T. D., Bonneville, S., Carslaw, K. S.,
Mihalopoulos, N., Baker, A. R., and Benning, L. G.: Impacts on iron
solubility in the mineral dust by processes in the source region and the
atmosphere: A review, Aeolian Res., 5, 21–42, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sholkovitz, E. R., Sedwick, P. N., and Church, T. M.: Influence of
anthropogenic combustion emissions on the deposition of soluble aerosol iron
to the ocean: Empirical estimates for island sites in the North Atlantic,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73, 3981–4003, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sholkovitz, E. R., Sedwick, P. N., Church, T. M., Baker, A. R., and Powell,
C. F.: Fractional solubility of aerosol iron: Synthesis of a global-scale
data set, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac, 89, 173–189, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sun, J. X., Liu, L., Xu, L., Wang, Y. Y., Wu, Z. J., Hu, M., Shi, Z. B., Li,
Y. J., Zhang, X. Y., Chen, J. M., and Li, W. J.: Key Role of Nitrate in
Phase Transitions of Urban Particles: Implications of Important Reactive
Surfaces for Secondary Aerosol Formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
1234–1243, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tagliabue, A., Bowie, A. R., Boyd, P. W., Buck, K. N., Johnson, K. S., and
Saito, M. A.: The integral role of iron in ocean biogeochemistry, Nature,
543, 51–59, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tang, W., Llort, J., Weis, J., Perron, M. M. G., Basart, S., Li, Z.,
Sathyendranath, S., Jackson, T., Sanz Rodriguez, E., Proemse, B. C., Bowie,
A. R., Schallenberg, C., Strutton, P. G., Matear, R., and Cassar, N.:
Widespread phytoplankton blooms triggered by 2019–2020 Australian
wildfires, Nature, 597, 370–375, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tao, Y. and Murphy, J. G.: The Mechanisms Responsible for the Interactions
among Oxalate, pH, and Fe Dissolution in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ACS Earth  Space Chem.,
3, 2259–2265, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3559?><ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tao, Y., Moravek, A., Furlani, T. C., Power, C. E., VandenBoer, T. C.,
Chang, R. Y. W., Wiacek, A., and Young, C. J.: Acidity of Size-Resolved
Sea-Salt Aerosol in a Coastal Urban Area: Comparison of Existing and New
Approaches, ACS Earth  Space Chem., 6, 1239–1249, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tian, H. Z., Wang, Y., Xue, Z. G., Cheng, K., Qu, Y. P., Chai, F. H., and Hao, J. M.: Trend and characteristics of atmospheric emissions of Hg, As, and Se from coal combustion in China, 1980–2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11905–11919, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11905-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11905-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Salana, S., Yu, H., Puthussery, J. V., and Verma, V.: On the
Relative Contribution of Iron and Organic Compounds, and Their Interaction
in Cellular Oxidative Potential of Ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Environ. Sci. Tech. Lett., 9, 680–686, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. Q., Wang, M. M., Li, S. P., Sun, H. Y., Mu, Z., Zhang, L. X., Li,
Y. G., and Chen, Q. C.: Study on the oxidation potential of the
water-soluble components of ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Xi'an, China: Pollution
levels, source apportionment and transport pathways, Environ. Int., 136,
105515, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105515" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2020.105515</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z., Fu, H., Zhang, L., Song, W., and Chen, J.: Ligand-Promoted
Photoreductive Dissolution of Goethite by Atmospheric Low-Molecular
Dicarboxylates, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 1647–1656, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z., Li, R., Cui, L., Fu, H., Lin, J., and Chen, J.: Characterization
and acid-mobilization study for typical iron-bearing clay mineral, J.
Environ. Sci., 71, 222–232, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Winton, V. H. L., Bowie, A. R., Edwards, R., Keywood, M., Townsend, A. T.,
van der Merwe, P., and Bollhofer, A.: Fractional iron solubility of
atmospheric iron inputs to the Southern Ocean, Mar. Chem., 177, 20–32,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P. S., Yang, Y., Fang, T., Mulholland, J. A., Russell, A. G.,
Ebelt, S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine Particle Iron in Soils and Road
Dust Is Modulated by Coal-Fired Power Plant Sulfur, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
54, 7088–7096, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, J., Ma, L., He, X., Au, W. C., Miao, Y., Wang, W.-X., and Nah, T.: Measurement report: Abundance and fractional solubilities of aerosol metals in urban Hong Kong – insights into factors that control aerosol metal dissolution in an urban site in South China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1403–1419, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1403-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-1403-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, T., Chen, Y., Zhou, S., Li, H., Wang, F., and Zhu, Y.: Solubilities
and deposition fluxes of atmospheric Fe and Cu over the Northwest Pacific
and its marginal seas, Atmos. Environ., 239, 117763, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117763" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117763</ext-link>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, Y. and Weber, R. J.: Ultrafiltration to characterize <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
water-soluble iron and its sources in an urban environment, Atmos. Environ.,
286, 119246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119246" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119246</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Young, A. H., Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Sander, R., Thornton, J. A.,
Riedel, T. P., and Maben, J. R.: Phase partitioning of soluble trace gases
with size-resolved aerosols in near-surface continental air over northern
Colorado, USA, during winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 118, 9414–9427, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhang, G. H., Lin, Q. H., Peng, L., Yang, Y. X., Jiang, F., Liu, F. X.,
Song, W., Chen, D. H., Cai, Z., Bi, X. H., Miller, M., Tang, M. J., Huang,
W. L., Wang, X. M., Peng, P. A., and Sheng, G. Y.: Oxalate Formation
Enhanced by Fe-Containing Particles and Environmental Implications, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 53, 1269–1277, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, H. H., Li, R., Dong, S. W., Wang, F., Zhu, Y. J., Meng, H., Huang, C.
P., Ren, Y., Wang, X. F., Hu, X. D., Li, T. T., Peng, C., Zhang, G. H., Xue,
L. K., Wang, X. M., and Tang, M. J.: Abundance and Fractional Solubility of
Aerosol Iron During Winter at a Coastal City in Northern China: Similarities
and Contrasts Between Fine and Coarse Particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos,
127, e2021JD036070, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD036070</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhang, R., Cao, J. J., Tang, Y. R., Arimoto, R., Shen, Z. X., Wu, F., Han,
Y. M., Wang, G. H., Zhang, J. Q., and Li, G. H.: Elemental profiles and
signatures of fugitive dusts from Chinese deserts, Sci. Total Environ., 472,
1121–1129, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. X., Schauer, J. J., Shafer, M. M., Hannigan, M. P., and Dutton, S.
J.: Source apportionment of in vitro reactive oxygen species bioassay
activity from atmospheric particulate matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
7502–7509, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, M., Zheng, G., Wang, H., Qiao, L., Zhu, S., Huang, D., An, J., Lou, S., Tao, S., Wang, Q., Yan, R., Ma, Y., Chen, C., Cheng, Y., Su, H., and Huang, C.: Long-term trends and drivers of aerosol pH in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13833–13844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13833-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13833-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y. H., Li, W. J., Lin, Q. H., Yuan, Q., Liu, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y.
X., Shao, L. Y., Niu, H. Y., Yang, S. S., and Shi, Z. B.: Iron solubility in
fine particles associated with secondary acidic aerosols in east China,
Environ. Pollut., 264, 114769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114769" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114769</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y., Li, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, L., Xu, L., Xu, J., Shi, J., Shao, L., Fu, P., Zhang, D., and Shi, Z.: Sources and processes of iron aerosols in a megacity in Eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2191–2202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2191-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-2191-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Seasonal variation of aerosol iron solubility in coarse and fine particles at an inland city in northwestern China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abbaspour, N., Hurrell, R., and Kelishadi, R.: Review on iron and its
importance for human health, J. Res. Med. Sci., 19, 164–174, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., and Gong, S. L.: Transition
metal-catalyzed oxidation of atmospheric sulfur: Global implications for the
sulfur budget, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D02309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.01029/02008jd010486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.01029/02008jd010486</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baker, A. R. and Jickells, T. D.: Mineral particle size as a control on
aerosol iron solubility, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.11029/12006GL026557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.11029/12006GL026557</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baker, A. R., Kanakidou, M., Nenes, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Croot, P. L.,
Duce, R. A., Gao, Y., Guieu, C., Ito, A., Jickells, T. D., Mahowald, N. M.,
Middag, R., Perron, M. M. G., Sarin, M. M., Shelley, R., and Turner, D. R.:
Changing atmospheric acidity as a modulator of nutrient deposition and ocean
biogeochemistry, Sci. Adv., 7, eabd8800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd8800" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd8800</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baker, J.: A cluster analysis of long range air transport pathways and
associated pollutant concentrations within the UK, Atmos. Environ., 44,
563–571, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boyd, P. W. and Ellwood, M. J.: The biogeochemical cycle of iron in the
ocean, Nat. Geosci., 3, 675–682, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cao, J. J. and Cui, L.: Current Status, Characteristics and Causes of
Particulate Air Pollution in the Fenwei Plain, China: A Review, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos, 126, e2020JD034472,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034472" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034472</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cao, J. J., Wang, Q. Y., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Tie, X. X., Shen, Z.
X., Wang, P., and An, Z. S.: Impacts of aerosol compositions on visibility
impairment in Xi'an, China, Atmos. Environ., 59, 559–566, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, H. H. and Grassian, V. H.: Iron Dissolution of Dust Source Materials
during Simulated Acidic Processing: The Effect of Sulfuric, Acetic, and
Oxalic Acids, Environ. Sci. Tech., 47, 10312–10321, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Y. and Siefert, R. L.: Seasonal and spatial distributions and dry
deposition fluxes of atmospheric total and labile iron over the tropical and
subtropical North Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 109, D09305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.01029/02003JD003958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.01029/02003JD003958</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Q. C., Hua, X. Y., Li, J. W., Chang, T., and Wang, Y. Q.: Diurnal
evolutions and sources of water-soluble chromophoric aerosols over Xi'an
during haze event, in Northwest China, Sci. Total Environ., 786, 147412,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147412" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147412</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Kuhns, H., Etyemezian, V., Lowenthal, D. H.,
Crow, D., Kohl, S. D., Engelbrecht, J. P., and Green, M. C.: Source profiles
for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol
Visibility and Observational study, Chemosphere, 54, 185–208, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chuang, P. Y., Duvall, R. M., Shafer, M. M., and Schauer, J. J.: The origin
of water soluble particulate iron in the Asian atmospheric outflow, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, L07813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.01029/02004GL021946" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.01029/02004GL021946</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, J., Zhao, P., Su, J., Dong, Q., Du, X., and Zhang, Y.: Aerosol pH and its driving factors in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7939–7954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7939-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7939-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Draxier, R. R. and Hess, G. D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4
modelling system for trajectories, dispersion and deposition, Aust.
Meteorol. Mag., 47, 295–308, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fang, T., Guo, H. Y., Zeng, L. H., Verma, V., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.:
Highly Acidic Ambient Particles, Soluble Metals, and Oxidative Potential: A
Link between Sulfate and Aerosol Toxicity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
2611–2620, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup>-Ca<sup>2+</sup>-Mg<sup>2+</sup>-NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-Na<sup>+</sup>-SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup>-H<sub>2</sub>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fu, H. B., Lin, J., Shang, G. F., Dong, W. B., Grassian, V. H., Carmichael,
G. R., Li, Y., and Chen, J. M.: Solubility of Iron from Combustion Source
Particles in Acidic Media Linked to Iron Speciation, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
46, 11119–11127, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, H., Xu, L., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M., Capps, S. L., Hite Jr., J. R., Carlton, A. G., Lee, S.-H., Bergin, M. H., Ng, N. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine-particle water and pH in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5211–5228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hamilton, D. S., Scanza, R. A., Rathod, S. D., Bond, T. C., Kok, J. F., Li,
L., Matsui, H., and Mahowald, N. M.: Recent (1980 to 2015) Trends and
Variability in Daily-to-Interannual Soluble Iron Deposition from Dust, Fire,
and Anthropogenic Sources, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089688, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089688" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089688</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, X., Liu, P., Zhao, W., Xu, H., Zhang, R., and Shen, Z.: Size
distribution of water-soluble metals in atmospheric particles in Xi'an,
China: Seasonal variations, bioavailability, and health risk assessment,
Atmos. Poll. Res., 12, 101090,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101090" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101090</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hennigan, C. J., Izumi, J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2775–2790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hsu, S.-C., Lin, F.-J., and Jeng, W.-L.: Seawater solubility of natural and
anthropogenic metals within ambient aerosols collected from Taiwan coastal
sites, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3989–4001, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, X., Song, Y., Zhao, C., Li, M., Zhu, T., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.:
Pathways of sulfate enhancement by natural and anthropogenic mineral
aerosols in China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 119, 14165–14179, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ito, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Kanakidou, M., Mahowald, N. M., Scanza, R.
A., Hamilton, D. S., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T., Sarin, M., Bikkina, S.,
Gao, Y., Shelley, R. U., Buck, C. S., Landing, W. M., Bowie, A. R., Perron,
M. M. G., Guieu, C., Meskhidze, N., Johnson, M. S., Feng, Y., Kok, J. F.,
Nenes, A., and Duce, R. A.: Pyrogenic iron: The missing link to high iron
solubility in aerosols, Sci. Adv., 5, eaau7671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7671" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7671</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ito, A., Ye, Y., Baldo, C., and Shi, Z. B.: Ocean fertilization by pyrogenic
aerosol iron, Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 4, 30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-41021-00185-41618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-41021-00185-41618</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jickells, T. D., An, Z. S., Andersen, K. K., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G.,
Brooks, N., Cao, J. J., Boyd, P. W., Duce, R. A., Hunter, K. A., Kawahata,
H., Kubilay, N., laRoche, J., Liss, P. S., Mahowald, N., Prospero, J. M.,
Ridgwell, A. J., Tegen, I., and Torres, R.: Global Iron Connections between
Desert Dust, Ocean Biogeochemistry, and Climate, Science, 308, 67–71, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Journet, E., Balkanski, Y., and Harrison, S. P.: A new data set of soil mineralogy for dust-cycle modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3801–3816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3801-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3801-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kawamura, K. and Bikkina, S.: A review of dicarboxylic acids and related
compounds in atmospheric aerosols: Molecular distributions, sources and
transformation, Atmos. Res., 170, 140–160, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kelly, F. J.: Oxidative stress: Its role in air pollution and adverse health
effects, Occup. Environ. Med., 60, 612–616, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kumar, A., Sarin, M. M., and Srinivas, B.: Aerosol iron solubility over Bay
of Bengal: Role of anthropogenic sources and chemical processing, Mar.
Chem., 121, 167–175, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lei, Y., Li, D., Lu, D., Zhang, T., Sun, J., Wang, X., Xu, H., and Shen, Z.:
Insights into the roles of aerosol soluble iron in secondary aerosol
formation, Atmos. Environ., 294, 119507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119507" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119507</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, R., Zhang, H. H., Wang, F., He, Y. T., Huang, C. P., Luo, L., Dong, S.
W., Jia, X. H., and Tang, M. J.: Mass fractions, solubility, speciation and
isotopic compositions of iron in coal and municipal waste fly ash, Sci.
Total Environ., 838, 155974, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155974" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155974</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, R., Dong, S. W., Huang, C. P., Yu, F., Wang, F., Li, X. F., Zhang, H.
H., Ren, Y., Guo, M. X., Chen, Q. C., Ge, B. Z., and Tang, M. J.: Evaluating
the effects of contact time and leaching solution on measured solubilities
of aerosol trace metals, Appl. Geochem., 148, 105551, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105551</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, W. J., Xu, L., Liu, X. H., Zhang, J. C., Lin, Y. T., Yao, X. H., Gao, H.
W., Zhang, D. Z., Chen, J. M., Wang, W. X., Harrison, R. M., Zhang, X. Y.,
Shao, L. Y., Fu, P. Q., Nenes, A., and Shi, Z. B.: Air pollution–aerosol
interactions produce more bioavailable iron for ocean ecosystems, Science
Adv., 3, e1601749, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601749" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601749</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, L., Lin, Q., Liang, Z., Du, R., Zhang, G., Zhu, Y., Qi, B., Zhou, S.,
and Li, W.: Variations in concentration and solubility of iron in
atmospheric fine particles during the COVID-19 pandemic: An example from
China, Gondwana Res., 97, 138–144, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, M. X., Matsui, H., Hamilton, D. S., Lamb, K. D., Rathod, S. D.,
Schwarz, J. P., and Mahowald, N. M.: The underappreciated role of
anthropogenic sources in atmospheric soluble iron flux to the Southern
Ocean, Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 5, 28,
10.1038/s41612-022-00250-w, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mahowald, N. M., Hamilton, D. S., Mackey, K. R. M., Moore, J. K., Baker, A.
R., Scanza, R. A., and Zhang, Y.: Aerosol trace metal leaching and impacts
on marine microorganisms, Nat. Commun., 9, 2614, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04970-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04970-7</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martin, J. H.: Glacial-interglacial CO<sub>2</sub> change: the iron hypothesis,
Paleoceanography, 5, 1–13, 1990.
Martin, L. R. and Good, T. W.: Catalyzed oxidation of sulfur dioxide in
solution: The iron-manganese synergism, Atmos. Environ., 25, 2395–2399,
1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
McDaniel, M. F. M., Ingall, E. D., Morton, P. L., Castorina, E., Weber, R.
J., Shelley, R. U., Landing, W. M., Longo, A. F., Feng, Y., and Lai, B.:
Relationship between Atmospheric Aerosol Mineral Surface Area and Iron
Solubility, ACS Earth  Space Chem., 3, 2443–2451, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meskhidze, N., Volker, C., Al-Abadleh, H. A., Barbeau, K., Bressac, M.,
Buck, C., Bundy, R. M., Croot, P., Feng, Y., Ito, A., Johansen, A. M.,
Landing, W. M., Mao, J. Q., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ohnemus, D., Pasquier, B.,
and Ye, Y.: Perspective on identifying and characterizing the processes
controlling iron speciation and residence time at the atmosphere-ocean
interface, Mar. Chem., 217, 103704, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moore, C. M., Mills, M. M., Achterberg, E. P., Geider, R. J., LaRoche, J.,
Lucas, M. I., McDonagh, E. L., Pan, X., Poulton, A. J., Rijkenberg, M. J.
A., Suggett, D. J., Ussher, S. J., and Woodward, E. M. S.: Large-scale
distribution of Atlantic nitrogen fixation controlled by iron availability,
Nat. Geosci., 2, 867–871, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myriokefalitakis, S., Ito, A., Kanakidou, M., Nenes, A., Krol, M. C., Mahowald, N. M., Scanza, R. A., Hamilton, D. S., Johnson, M. S., Meskhidze, N., Kok, J. F., Guieu, C., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T. D., Sarin, M. M., Bikkina, S., Shelley, R., Bowie, A., Perron, M. M. G., and Duce, R. A.: Reviews and syntheses: the GESAMP atmospheric iron deposition model intercomparison study, Biogeosciences, 15, 6659–6684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6659-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myriokefalitakis, S., Tsigaridis, K., Mihalopoulos, N., Sciare, J., Nenes, A., Kawamura, K., Segers, A., and Kanakidou, M.: In-cloud oxalate formation in the global troposphere: a 3-D modeling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5761–5782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5761-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5761-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oakes, M., Weber, R. J., Lai, B., Russell, A., and Ingall, E. D.: Characterization of iron speciation in urban and rural single particles using XANES spectroscopy and micro X-ray fluorescence measurements: investigating the relationship between speciation and fractional iron solubility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 745–756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-745-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-745-2012</a>, 2012a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oakes, M., Ingall, E. D., Lai, B., Shafer, M. M., Hays, M. D., Liu, Z. G.,
Russell, A. G., and Weber, R. J.: Iron Solubility Related to Particle Sulfur
Content in Source Emission and Ambient Fine Particles, Environ. Sci.
Tech., 46, 6637–6644, 2012b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ooki, A., Nishioka, J., Ono, T., and Noriki, S.: Size dependence of iron
solubility of Asian mineral dust particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 114,
D03202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.01029/02008JD010804" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.01029/02008JD010804</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paris, R. and Desboeufs, K. V.: Effect of atmospheric organic complexation on iron-bearing dust solubility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4895–4905, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4895-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4895-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paris, R., Desboeufs, K. V., and Journet, E.: Variability of dust iron
solubility in atmospheric waters: Investigation of the role of oxalate
organic complexation, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6510–6517, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paris, R., Desboeufs, K. V., Formenti, P., Nava, S., and Chou, C.: Chemical characterisation of iron in dust and biomass burning aerosols during AMMA-SOP0/DABEX: implication for iron solubility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4273–4282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4273-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4273-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Alexander, B., Ault, A. P., Barth, M. C., Clegg, S. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Fahey, K. M., Hennigan, C. J., Herrmann, H., Kanakidou, M., Kelly, J. T., Ku, I.-T., McNeill, V. F., Riemer, N., Schaefer, T., Shi, G., Tilgner, A., Walker, J. T., Wang, T., Weber, R., Xing, J., Zaveri, R. A., and Zuend, A.: The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4809–4888, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sakata, K., Kurisu, M., Takeichi, Y., Sakaguchi, A., Tanimoto, H., Tamenori, Y., Matsuki, A., and Takahashi, Y.: Iron (Fe) speciation in size-fractionated aerosol particles in the Pacific Ocean: The role of organic complexation of Fe with humic-like substances in controlling Fe solubility, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9461–9482, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9461-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9461-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schroth, A. W., Crusius, J., Sholkovitz, E. R., and Bostick, B. C.: Iron
solubility driven by speciation in dust sources to the ocean, Nat.
Geosci., 2, 337–340, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sedwick, P. N., Sholkovitz, E. R., and Church, T. M.: Impact of
anthropogenic combustion emissions on the fractional solubility of aerosol
iron: Evidence from the Sargasso Sea, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 8, Q10Q06,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001586" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001586</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change (Third edition), Wiley Interscience, New
York, ISBN 978-1-118-94740-1, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shelley, R. U., Landing, W. M., Ussher, S. J., Planquette, H., and Sarthou, G.: Regional trends in the fractional solubility of Fe and other metals from North Atlantic aerosols (GEOTRACES cruises GA01 and GA03) following a two-stage leach, Biogeosciences, 15, 2271–2288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2271-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2271-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, J. H., Guan, Y., Ito, A., Gao, H. W., Yao, X. H., Baker, A. R., and
Zhang, D. Z.: High Production of Soluble Iron Promoted by Aerosol
Acidification in Fog, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086124,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl086124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl086124</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, Z., Bonneville, S., Krom, M. D., Carslaw, K. S., Jickells, T. D., Baker, A. R., and Benning, L. G.: Iron dissolution kinetics of mineral dust at low pH during simulated atmospheric processing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 995–1007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-995-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-995-2011</a>, 2011a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, Z. B., Woodhouse, M. T., Carslaw, K. S., Krom, M. D., Mann, G. W., Baker, A. R., Savov, I., Fones, G. R., Brooks, B., Drake, N., Jickells, T. D., and Benning, L. G.: Minor effect of physical size sorting on iron solubility of transported mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8459–8469, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8459-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8459-2011</a>, 2011b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, Z. B., Krom, M. D., Jickells, T. D., Bonneville, S., Carslaw, K. S.,
Mihalopoulos, N., Baker, A. R., and Benning, L. G.: Impacts on iron
solubility in the mineral dust by processes in the source region and the
atmosphere: A review, Aeolian Res., 5, 21–42, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sholkovitz, E. R., Sedwick, P. N., and Church, T. M.: Influence of
anthropogenic combustion emissions on the deposition of soluble aerosol iron
to the ocean: Empirical estimates for island sites in the North Atlantic,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73, 3981–4003, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sholkovitz, E. R., Sedwick, P. N., Church, T. M., Baker, A. R., and Powell,
C. F.: Fractional solubility of aerosol iron: Synthesis of a global-scale
data set, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac, 89, 173–189, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, J. X., Liu, L., Xu, L., Wang, Y. Y., Wu, Z. J., Hu, M., Shi, Z. B., Li,
Y. J., Zhang, X. Y., Chen, J. M., and Li, W. J.: Key Role of Nitrate in
Phase Transitions of Urban Particles: Implications of Important Reactive
Surfaces for Secondary Aerosol Formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123,
1234–1243, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tagliabue, A., Bowie, A. R., Boyd, P. W., Buck, K. N., Johnson, K. S., and
Saito, M. A.: The integral role of iron in ocean biogeochemistry, Nature,
543, 51–59, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, W., Llort, J., Weis, J., Perron, M. M. G., Basart, S., Li, Z.,
Sathyendranath, S., Jackson, T., Sanz Rodriguez, E., Proemse, B. C., Bowie,
A. R., Schallenberg, C., Strutton, P. G., Matear, R., and Cassar, N.:
Widespread phytoplankton blooms triggered by 2019–2020 Australian
wildfires, Nature, 597, 370–375, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, Y. and Murphy, J. G.: The Mechanisms Responsible for the Interactions
among Oxalate, pH, and Fe Dissolution in PM<sub>2.5</sub>, ACS Earth  Space Chem.,
3, 2259–2265, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tao, Y., Moravek, A., Furlani, T. C., Power, C. E., VandenBoer, T. C.,
Chang, R. Y. W., Wiacek, A., and Young, C. J.: Acidity of Size-Resolved
Sea-Salt Aerosol in a Coastal Urban Area: Comparison of Existing and New
Approaches, ACS Earth  Space Chem., 6, 1239–1249, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tian, H. Z., Wang, Y., Xue, Z. G., Cheng, K., Qu, Y. P., Chai, F. H., and Hao, J. M.: Trend and characteristics of atmospheric emissions of Hg, As, and Se from coal combustion in China, 1980–2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11905–11919, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11905-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11905-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Salana, S., Yu, H., Puthussery, J. V., and Verma, V.: On the
Relative Contribution of Iron and Organic Compounds, and Their Interaction
in Cellular Oxidative Potential of Ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>, Environ. Sci. Tech. Lett., 9, 680–686, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y. Q., Wang, M. M., Li, S. P., Sun, H. Y., Mu, Z., Zhang, L. X., Li,
Y. G., and Chen, Q. C.: Study on the oxidation potential of the
water-soluble components of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> over Xi'an, China: Pollution
levels, source apportionment and transport pathways, Environ. Int., 136,
105515, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105515" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105515</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Z., Fu, H., Zhang, L., Song, W., and Chen, J.: Ligand-Promoted
Photoreductive Dissolution of Goethite by Atmospheric Low-Molecular
Dicarboxylates, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 1647–1656, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Z., Li, R., Cui, L., Fu, H., Lin, J., and Chen, J.: Characterization
and acid-mobilization study for typical iron-bearing clay mineral, J.
Environ. Sci., 71, 222–232, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Winton, V. H. L., Bowie, A. R., Edwards, R., Keywood, M., Townsend, A. T.,
van der Merwe, P., and Bollhofer, A.: Fractional iron solubility of
atmospheric iron inputs to the Southern Ocean, Mar. Chem., 177, 20–32,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wong, J. P. S., Yang, Y., Fang, T., Mulholland, J. A., Russell, A. G.,
Ebelt, S., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine Particle Iron in Soils and Road
Dust Is Modulated by Coal-Fired Power Plant Sulfur, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
54, 7088–7096, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, J., Ma, L., He, X., Au, W. C., Miao, Y., Wang, W.-X., and Nah, T.: Measurement report: Abundance and fractional solubilities of aerosol metals in urban Hong Kong – insights into factors that control aerosol metal dissolution in an urban site in South China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1403–1419, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1403-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1403-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, T., Chen, Y., Zhou, S., Li, H., Wang, F., and Zhu, Y.: Solubilities
and deposition fluxes of atmospheric Fe and Cu over the Northwest Pacific
and its marginal seas, Atmos. Environ., 239, 117763, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117763" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117763</a>, 2020.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Y. and Weber, R. J.: Ultrafiltration to characterize PM<sub>2.5</sub>
water-soluble iron and its sources in an urban environment, Atmos. Environ.,
286, 119246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119246" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119246</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Young, A. H., Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Sander, R., Thornton, J. A.,
Riedel, T. P., and Maben, J. R.: Phase partitioning of soluble trace gases
with size-resolved aerosols in near-surface continental air over northern
Colorado, USA, during winter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 118, 9414–9427, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, G. H., Lin, Q. H., Peng, L., Yang, Y. X., Jiang, F., Liu, F. X.,
Song, W., Chen, D. H., Cai, Z., Bi, X. H., Miller, M., Tang, M. J., Huang,
W. L., Wang, X. M., Peng, P. A., and Sheng, G. Y.: Oxalate Formation
Enhanced by Fe-Containing Particles and Environmental Implications, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 53, 1269–1277, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, H. H., Li, R., Dong, S. W., Wang, F., Zhu, Y. J., Meng, H., Huang, C.
P., Ren, Y., Wang, X. F., Hu, X. D., Li, T. T., Peng, C., Zhang, G. H., Xue,
L. K., Wang, X. M., and Tang, M. J.: Abundance and Fractional Solubility of
Aerosol Iron During Winter at a Coastal City in Northern China: Similarities
and Contrasts Between Fine and Coarse Particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos,
127, e2021JD036070, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036070" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036070</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, R., Cao, J. J., Tang, Y. R., Arimoto, R., Shen, Z. X., Wu, F., Han,
Y. M., Wang, G. H., Zhang, J. Q., and Li, G. H.: Elemental profiles and
signatures of fugitive dusts from Chinese deserts, Sci. Total Environ., 472,
1121–1129, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y. X., Schauer, J. J., Shafer, M. M., Hannigan, M. P., and Dutton, S.
J.: Source apportionment of in vitro reactive oxygen species bioassay
activity from atmospheric particulate matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
7502–7509, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, M., Zheng, G., Wang, H., Qiao, L., Zhu, S., Huang, D., An, J., Lou, S., Tao, S., Wang, Q., Yan, R., Ma, Y., Chen, C., Cheng, Y., Su, H., and Huang, C.: Long-term trends and drivers of aerosol pH in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13833–13844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13833-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13833-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhu, Y. H., Li, W. J., Lin, Q. H., Yuan, Q., Liu, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y.
X., Shao, L. Y., Niu, H. Y., Yang, S. S., and Shi, Z. B.: Iron solubility in
fine particles associated with secondary acidic aerosols in east China,
Environ. Pollut., 264, 114769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114769" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114769</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhu, Y., Li, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, L., Xu, L., Xu, J., Shi, J., Shao, L., Fu, P., Zhang, D., and Shi, Z.: Sources and processes of iron aerosols in a megacity in Eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2191–2202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2191-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2191-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
