<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-23-221-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Impact of phase state and non-ideal <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> mixing on equilibration timescales of <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> secondary organic aerosol partitioning</article-title><alt-title>Impact of phase state and non-ideal mixing on equilibration timescales</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Impact of phase state and non-ideal mixing on equilibration timescales}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M. Schervish and M. Shiraiwa}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Schervish</surname><given-names>Meredith</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Shiraiwa</surname><given-names>Manabu</given-names></name>
          <email>m.shiraiwa@uci.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2532-5373</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Manabu Shiraiwa (m.shiraiwa@uci.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>221</fpage><lpage>233</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>September</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>December</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>December</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e92">Evidence has accumulated that secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) exhibit complex morphologies with multiple phases that can adopt amorphous semisolid or glassy phase states. However, experimental analysis and numerical modeling on the formation and evolution of SOA still often employ equilibrium partitioning with an ideal mixing assumption in the particle phase. Here we apply the kinetic multilayer model of gas–particle partitioning (KM-GAP) to simulate condensation of semi-volatile species into a core–shell phase-separated particle to evaluate equilibration timescales of SOA partitioning. By varying bulk diffusivity and the activity coefficient of the condensing species in the shell, we probe the complex interplay of mass transfer kinetics and the thermodynamics of partitioning. We found that the interplay of non-ideality and phase state can impact SOA partitioning kinetics significantly. The effect of non-ideality on SOA partitioning is slight for liquid particles but becomes prominent in semisolid or solid particles. If the condensing species is miscible with a low activity coefficient in the viscous shell phase, the particle can reach equilibrium with the gas phase long before the dissolution of concentration gradients in the particle bulk. For the condensation of immiscible species with a high activity coefficient in the semisolid shell, the mass concentration in the shell may become higher or overshoot its equilibrium concentration due to slow bulk diffusion through the viscous shell for excess mass to be transferred to the core phase. Equilibration timescales are shorter for the condensation of lower-volatility species into semisolid shell; as the volatility increases, re-evaporation becomes significant as desorption is faster for volatile species than bulk diffusion in a semisolid matrix, leading to an increase in equilibration timescale. We also show that the equilibration timescale is longer in an open system relative to a closed system especially for partitioning of miscible species; hence, caution should be exercised when interpreting and extrapolating closed-system chamber experimental results to atmosphere conditions. Our results provide a possible explanation for discrepancies between experimental observations of fast particle–particle mixing and predictions of long mixing timescales in viscous particles and provide useful insights into description and treatment of SOA in aerosol models.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e104">Secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) are ubiquitous in the atmosphere, comprising a major fraction of atmospheric aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.1"/>.
They have impacts on air quality, public health, and climate, and their representation in large-scale models remains a major challenge in atmospheric chemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.2"/>.
SOA is generated through oxidation of volatile organic compounds and condensation of semi- and low-volatile products into preexisting particles.
This involves a series of transport processes including gas-phase diffusion, gas–surface transfer via reversible adsorption, surface–bulk exchange, and bulk diffusion within the particle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.3"/>.
These processes are often represented as very fast relative to the timescales of other atmospheric processes associated with SOA, so that the gas and particle are traditionally regarded as being in instantaneous equilibrium.</p>
      <p id="d1e116">There has been mounting evidence that SOA particles can exist in amorphous semisolid or glassy states depending on chemical composition, relative humidity, and temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.4"/>.
Global and regional modeling studies have shown that organic aerosols exist in an amorphous solid or glassy state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.5"/>, facilitating long-range transport of organic compounds in the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.6"/>.
The occurrence of a highly viscous state can lead to kinetic limitations of bulk diffusion within the particle to retard heterogeneous reactions and evaporation kinetics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.7"/>.
Uptake coefficients of isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOXs) are observed to be reduced by organic coatings, affecting particle morphology and chemical evolution of SOA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.8"/>.
Modeling work also demonstrates the impact of diffusion limitations in highly viscous aerosol on partitioning of semi-volatile compounds, thus affecting the evolution of particle size distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.9"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e138">Equilibration timescales can be prolonged in highly viscous particles under low relative humidities and temperatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.10"/>.
In fact, a recent field observation in Beijing demonstrated that partitioning of organic species was retarded to limit SOA mass when ambient particles adopt a semisolid state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.11"/>.
Chamber experiments have observed limited particle–particle mixing of SOA, while some experimental studies indicate little kinetic limitations and fast mixing between miscible organic species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.12"/>.
These contrasting results leave questions open about the conditions under which conditions and properties kinetically limited or equilibrium gas–particle partitioning can be expected in the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.13"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e153">Atmospheric aerosol particles are generally complex mixtures of organics and inorganics and water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.14"/>.
Such mixtures may exhibit non-ideal behavior possibly with phase separation when the organic components have low O : C ratio and often exist in core–shell structures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.15"/>.
Aerosols composed of two organic populations may also phase-separate into two phases (usually a highly oxidized hydrophilic phase and a low O : C hydrophobic phase) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.16"/>.
Very recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.17"/> even showed that the particles consisting of primary organic compounds, SOA, and inorganic compounds can phase-separate into three phases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.18"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e172">Many studies still assume a homogeneous well-mixed particle phase as well as ideal mixing between the particle and condensing gas-phase species. Because a dynamic consideration of gas–particle equilibrium would be significantly more computationally expensive especially in larger-scale models, it is important to understand under what conditions this consideration is most critical <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.19"/>.
Based on current experimental techniques, it is challenging to determine whether any limitations to SOA partitioning or mixing are due to diffusion limitations, small mass accommodation coefficients, or non-ideality and low miscibility between the populations studied.
In this study, we investigate the combined effects of particle phase state and non-ideal mixing by modeling condensation of semi-volatile species into core–shell particles to evaluate equilibration timescales of SOA partitioning.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e186">The kinetic multilayer model of gas–particle interactions in aerosols and clouds (KM-GAP) has been described in detail previously <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.20"/>.
A brief description and the specifics of the implementation for this work are addressed here.
We assume a particle of a core–shell morphology, mimicking the shell phase with predominantly organics and the core phase as aqueous inorganics.
KM-GAP consists of a gas phase, a sorption layer, a near-surface bulk layer (nsb), and a number of bulk layers.
As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, we represent the shell phase with a near-surface bulk layer and four bulk layers, while the core is represented with one layer.
Sensitivity studies were conducted with more layers (10 and 20 layers) to ensure that the simulation results were not sensitive to the number of layers chosen, but it only affects the resolution of bulk concentration profiles.
KM-GAP explicitly treats the processes of gas-phase diffusion, adsorption and desorption, surface-to-bulk transport, and bulk diffusion within the shell and transport between the shell and core phases.
A monodisperse particle population with an initial particle diameter of 200 nm and total particle concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed, which yields a total organic aerosol mass of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The core and shell are composed of different non-volatile species each with a molar mass of 200 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Initially, the total amount of mass in the core and shell are the same so that there will be an equal amount in each phase at equilibrium when the activity coefficients of the condensing species is 1 in both phases.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e262">KM-GAP model representation showing the different particle layers with a near-surface bulk layer (nsb) and four additional bulk layers (b<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–b<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).
In this work <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all runs, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is varied between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is varied in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/221/2023/acp-23-221-2023-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e433">A gas-phase species is present with the same molar mass and density as the particle phase species but with pure compound saturation mass concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Volatility or effective saturation mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which controls the partitioning by driving the surface to bulk transport in the model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.21"/>.
The initial gas-phase concentration of the condensing species is set to be small, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, so that condensation of trace amounts of condensing species would not alter particle diameter and properties including phase state and non-ideality.
It also ensures that the approximate volume of each layer is maintained even in circumstances with slow diffusion.
We mainly consider a closed system, in which condensation of species would lead to a decrease in its gas-phase mass concentration and an increase in its particle phase mass concentration, while we also conduct additional simulations with an open system with a fixed gas-phase concentration. The surface accommodation coefficient is set to be 1 based on previous measurements and molecular dynamics simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.22"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e547">The bulk diffusivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is varied in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> covering the range of particles being in a liquid, semisolid to amorphous solid, or glassy phase state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.23"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is fixed at any given depth in the particle bulk in each simulation, assuming that condensation would not alter particle viscosity and diffusivity, as only trace amounts of species condense to preexisting particles in these simulations.
The activity coefficient of the condensing species in the shell is varied in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, covering and expanding the range of activity coefficients measured or modeled in between atmospherically relevant compounds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.24"/>.
While many atmospherically relevant mixtures will form near-ideal solutions, with activity coefficients between 0.1 and 10, such as partitioning of similarly oxidized SOA components into an organic-rich phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.25"/>, extremes of miscibility can be present as well. For example, the thermodynamic model AIOMFAC (Aerosol Inorganic-Organic Mixtures Functional groups Activity Coefficients; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="altparen.26"/>) predicts an activity coefficient of as high as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene oxidation products in an aqueous electrolyte-rich phase and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a strongly hydrophobic species such as hexane in a solution of hydrophilic glyoxal and water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.27"/>.
On the other end, AIOMFAC predicts an activity coefficient below 0.1 for small dicarboxylic acids in water–glyoxal solutions at high water activities, and similarly low activity coefficients have been experimentally determined for oxalic acid in acid–water solutions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.28"/>.
The activity coefficient of the condensing species in the core is fixed to be 1 for all simulations.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding equilibration timescale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is calculated the first time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) the following inequality is satisfied:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M41" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass concentration of the condensing species in the phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (shell, core, or total particle) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding equilibration time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), initial time (0), and equilibrium (eq).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e842">We first show the simulation results of a few representative cases to illustrate how partitioning and mass transport of the condensing species in the semisolid shell of a phase-separated particle are affected by non-ideality. Then we discuss the overall combined effects of non-ideality and particle phase state on equilibration timescales of SOA partitioning.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Temporal evolution of SOA partitioning</title>
      <p id="d1e852">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows the simulation results for condensation of semi-volatile species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) into core–shell particles: the shell is semisolid with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the core is liquid with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Three simulations are shown where the activity coefficient is changed to represent a different miscibility of the semi-volatile species in the shell phase.
The activity coefficient of the condensing species in the shell phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is set to be (panel a) 1 (ideal), (b) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (highly miscible), and (c) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (hardly miscible), while that in the core phase is set to be 1 for all cases.
Through these representative cases, the effects of non-ideality and phase state on timescales of equilibration can be realized.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1026">Temporal evolution of partitioning of semi-volatile species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) into core–shell particles with the core phase being liquid and the shell phase being semisolid with a bulk diffusivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The activity coefficients of the condensing species in the shell phase are set to be <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The activity coefficients of the condensing species in the core phase are set to be 1 for all cases.
The green dashed line is the concentration in the whole particle and the red line shows the concentration in the core. The blue lines show the concentration in each shell layer, getting progressively lighter in color from the near-surface bulk layer to the innermost shell layer (near-surface bulk, b<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–b<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The black line is the average concentration in the shell. The vertical black lines show the equilibrium timescales for the shell (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and total particle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/221/2023/acp-23-221-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1248">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis is simulation time in seconds and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis gives the number concentration of the condensing species in molecules per volume.
The blue lines show the concentration in each shell layer (shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>), getting progressively lighter in color from the near-surface bulk layer to the innermost shell layer (nsb, b<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–b<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The average concentrations in the shell (black), core (red), and whole particle (dashed green) are also shown.
These concentrations increase over time as condensation of semi-volatile species progresses.
In some cases, these concentrations need to decrease to reach their equilibrium values due to the interplay of slow diffusion and non-ideality as discussed below.</p>
      <p id="d1e1289">The timescales, calculated from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) for the shell (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and total particle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be identified and are shown in the plots as the vertical lines. In the two non-ideal cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is equivalent to one of the other timescales and thus a single line is labeled with both. It is useful to consider the total amount of the condensable vapor that can be held by each phase within the particle, which is a function of the total mass concentration, the pure compound saturation mass concentration, and the activity coefficient in each phase. Because the mass of each particle phase is practically the same, the fraction of the condensing species that will end up in the core relative to the shell would be the ratio of the inverse of the activity coefficients, which is equal to the activity coefficient in the shell as the activity coefficient in the core is set to be 1. Hence, at high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the core will retain most of the mass and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is controlled by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the shell containing most of the condensing mass at equilibrium.</p>
      <p id="d1e1445">In all three cases shown here, the mass concentrations in the shell may become higher than the condensing species' equilibrium concentration due to slow bulk diffusion through the shell for excess mass to be transferred to the core phase. This overshooting behavior is most prominent in the case where the semi-volatile species is immiscible with the shell phase (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as concentrations in all shell layers overshoot their equilibrium values.
This behavior also leads to an interesting consideration of what the equilibration timescale represents, as this will lead to two different times when the inequality in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) holds.
For example, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c, the first time this equality is met is at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 ms followed by a period where the concentration in the shell is outside the inequality because it is too high. This condition is once again satisfied at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 h.
The first one corresponds to the time when the average concentration in the shell is close to its steady state value, while the second value is representative of when the concentration gradients within the shell are close to dissolving to reach full equilibrium within the particle.
Note that there are some cases where this same overshoot occurs, but the extent of overshooting is so small that the inequality in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) holds throughout the whole range.
Realistically if there is such a small change in the concentration, the equilibrium can likely be considered to be holding throughout the whole range.
This occurs in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b, where the equilibration timescale for the shell with the gas phase is found to be roughly 7 min, while there is still a concentration gradient and the shell has not reached full equilibrium yet.
The timescale for the concentration gradients to dissipate closely follows the equilibration timescale of the core.
Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should be used to discuss the relaxation timescale of concentration gradients in the shell.
This overshooting phenomenon is only seen in the shell, and both values will be discussed here as each one may be more relevant in different circumstances.
For example, in the case of acid-catalyzed IEPOX reactive uptake, it may be important to know the concentration of IEPOX in the innermost region of a core–shell particle with an aqueous core as this would be where the reaction occurs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.29"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1522">In the ideal case (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the shell reaches a steady state within a few minutes as the shell can hold a substantial amount of the condensing material.
A concentration gradient is maintained through the shell due to kinetic limitations of bulk diffusion though the shell to the core, resulting in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being about 4 h.
Despite diffusion in the shell being slow with a timescale of a couple hours for the relaxation of concentration gradients, the condensing species reaches its equilibrium concentration in the particle significantly faster with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about 10 min.</p>
      <p id="d1e1572">When the activity coefficient for the condensing species in the shell is reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to represent the partitioning of highly miscible species to the particle phase, 3 orders of magnitude more mass resides in the shell than in the core at equilibrium as expected. As such, there is so much more of the condensing species in the shell, resulting in the equilibration timescale for the whole particle being the same as that in the shell: approximately 7 min. The shell overshoots its equilibrium value slightly and once a time is reached where Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) is met, every subsequent time step also meets the inequality. Note that much longer than 7 min is required for the concentration gradients to dissolve. These concentration gradients dissipate, and the core equilibrates in about 2.5 months. This is because not only is bulk diffusion in the shell slow, but the exchange between the shell and core phases is also slow as the condensing species is much more miscible in the shell phase.</p>
      <p id="d1e1598">When the activity coefficient for the condensing species in the shell is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, representing the partitioning of non-miscible species into organics, there are 5 orders of magnitude more mass in the core than in the shell at equilibrium.
Thus, in contrast to the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> case, the timescale to achieve the total gas–particle equilibrium is controlled by partitioning to the core. Because the equilibrium concentration in the shell is so low, equilibrium between the shell and gas phase is achieved very rapidly in 2 ms. Due to slow bulk diffusion within the shell, concentration gradients in the shell persist, leading to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1 h.
As partitioning into the particle bulk is hindered by the high activity coefficient in the shell, a steady-state shell concentration is maintained above the equilibrium concentration.
This is maintained until the whole particle has achieved its equilibrium concentration with the concentration in the core increasing to its final equilibrium value in about 1 h. This timescale is much shorter than the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> case, as the exchange rate between shell and core phases is fast, as the condensing species is more miscible in the core phase.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Effects of non-ideality and bulk diffusivity on equilibration timescales</title>
      <p id="d1e1665">We explore how equilibration timescales of semi-volatile species are affected by both non-ideality and particle viscosity.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the equilibration timescales for (panel a) total particle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), (b) core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and (c) shell (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of the activity coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bulk diffusivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the condensing species in the shell.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is controlled by the phase that holds the most mass at equilibrium: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is almost identical to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is very close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As discussed above, the relaxation timescale of concentration gradients within the particle is characterized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1875">Equilibration timescales of semi-volatile species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in <bold>(a)</bold> total particle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> core (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <bold>(c)</bold> shell (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of the activity coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bulk diffusivity in the shell (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/221/2023/acp-23-221-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2004">When the particle is liquid with high bulk diffusivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has little effect on the equilibration timescale. The effect of non-ideality becomes prominent in semisolid or solid particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. When the shell is viscous, it takes longer for the species to move through the shell to reach the core, thus increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is low, little mass needs to be transported to the core for equilibrium to be achieved and more mass needs to accumulate in the shell before a large activity gradient is achieved to move material into the core. Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes longer when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is low despite the species miscibility in the core remaining the same (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Concentration gradients throughout the particle will be maintained until the core has reached equilibrium and thus Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b also serves to depict a relaxation timescale of concentration gradients and the timescale to reach full equilibrium within a particle. Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the gas–particle equilibration timescale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a indicates that, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is small and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is low, the particle may achieve equilibrium with the gas phase faster than the particle itself reaches equilibrium without concentration gradients.</p>
      <p id="d1e2248">The same trend is observed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c), i.e., that non-ideality has little effect unless the shell is viscous.
When the diffusion is slow, the shell can achieve its equilibrium concentration very quickly when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is large because very little mass of semi-volatile species is required to condense to achieve equilibrium. In contrast, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is small, much more mass is required. Since this is a closed system, once <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, more than 90 % of the available condensing species is in the shell at equilibrium and decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has very little impact on the equilibration timescale.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Volatility effects on equilibration timescale</title>
      <p id="d1e2326">In this section we investigate the effects of volatility of the condensing species on equilibration timescale. The same system setup is used, while the pure compound saturation mass concentration of the condensing species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is varied in the range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to show how the combined effects of the vapor pressure of the gas phase and non-ideal mixing impact the equilibration timescale. This range captures the volatility of a typical range of atmospheric organic compounds. While there are lower-volatility compounds such as highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) and extremely low-volatility organic compounds (ELVOCs), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is low enough with almost no effect of activity on the equilibrium timescale of the whole particle as discussed below <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.30"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2430">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the equilibration timescale for the range of volatility cases for two different cases of diffusivity with the particle shell being liquid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and semisolid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the liquid shell (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a), rapid equilibrium is achieved across all values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> without diffusion limitations. The time to achieve equilibrium depends mainly on how much of the gas-phase species must condense to achieve equilibrium. When the volatility and the activity coefficient are higher, lower concentrations are needed to reach equilibrium; thus, the partitioning occurs very fast with short equilibration timescales. Higher concentrations are necessary with lower volatility and a lower activity coefficient, leading to longer equilibration timescales.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2545">Equilibrium timescales of SOA partitioning as a function of pure compound saturation mass concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the activity coefficient of the condensing species in the shell (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with bulk diffusivity of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/221/2023/acp-23-221-2023-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2678">The opposite trend is found for the semisolid case as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b: equilibrium is reached faster when the volatility of the condensing species is lower. This is consistent with previous work on the effect of volatility on equilibration timescales of partitioning into homogeneous single-phase semisolid particles in a closed system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.31"/>.
In the lower-volatility cases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), there is little effect of the activity coefficient in the shell on equilibrium timescale. This is because the condensing species with sufficiently low volatility will not re-evaporate once it condenses, leading to a rapid increase in concentration at the particle surface and in the near-surface bulk. Even when the activity coefficient is high, the near-surface bulk will rapidly achieve a concentration that is higher than its equilibrium concentration, which then decreases upon diffusion into the particle bulk. This leads to the total particle equilibrium being achieved quickly and being dependent on the timescale for equilibrium in the shell, even if the core will contain more of the condensing species at equilibrium and the timescale to achieve full equilibrium without concentration gradients would take longer.</p>
      <p id="d1e2727">As the volatility increases, re-evaporation from the semisolid particle becomes significant as desorption is faster than surface–bulk exchange and bulk diffusion in a semisolid matrix, leading to an increase in equilibration timescale. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, we observe a small effect of the activity coefficient on the total particle equilibrium: as also shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is low, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is controlled by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The transition between these two regimes extends over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the equilibrium concentrations in each phase are equal. This occurs because when the volatility is lower, more mass can be held by the shell at the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will control <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to higher values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2969">High-volatility cases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) show strong effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is low. At high volatilities, decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will increase the equilibrium concentration in the shell and thus the time it takes to achieve equilibrium. Overall, the equilibration timescale is long in these cases due to the rapid evaporation of these volatile species, even though less mass needs to condense to reach equilibrium.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Closed versus open systems</title>
      <p id="d1e3053">So far, all presented simulations were conducted in a closed system, where a fixed amount of the condensing species exists in the system and the gas-phase concentration decreases upon condensation. This closed system is characteristic of chamber experiments and closed atmospheric air mass when atmospheric aerosol particles are exposed to a limited low concentration of some gas-phase species. This situation can be justified well within timescales of seconds to minutes and possibly up to hours  for stagnated air mass, depending on meteorological conditions. For longer timescales, the ambient atmosphere may be better approximated as an open system due to dilution and chemical production and loss, where the gas-phase concentration remains at a constant steady-state value. Previous modeling studies that simulated SOA partitioning into ideally mixed homogeneous particles have shown that the open system can lead to longer equilibration timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.32"/>. In this section we explore how non-ideality and phase state can impact equilibration timescales in an open system.</p>
      <p id="d1e3059">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a shows the results of such simulations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (green line).
With replenishment of the gas phase, the particle will take up more mass of the condensing species. Hence, it leads to a prolongation of equilibration timescales compared to the closed system, and this effect is observed across all activity coefficients in the shell. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has no effect on the equilibration timescale because the total mass that will condense at equilibrium is dominated by the core. In contrast, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the total amount of the condensing species that can be held by the whole particle increases as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases. Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases sharply with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the open system rather than staying constant as in the closed system.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3193"><bold>(a)</bold> Equilibrium timescale of SOA partitioning (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a particle with bulk diffusivity in the shell of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and varying activity coefficients of the condensing species.
The green and blue lines show the simulations in the open and closed system, respectively.
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the activity coefficient of the condensing species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bulk diffusivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the shell in the open system. Due to computational limitations, simulations using slower diffusivities than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were not conducted.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/221/2023/acp-23-221-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3362">The miscibility of the condensing species in the shell phase affects the extent to which the equilibration timescale is increased in the open system relative to the closed system. When the condensing species is immiscible with the shell with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the open system leads to an increase in the equilibration timescale by roughly a factor of 10. For highly miscible species, for example with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the open system is more than 4 orders of magnitude higher than that in the closed system. Even with a more modest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.1, an open system would equilibrate at 3 h, which is 250 times slower than the case in the closed system that equilibrates in 1 min. Such big differences can lead to large discrepancies when interpreting and extrapolating closed-system chamber experimental results to the atmosphere conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3424">This effect persists even when the shell is liquid in contrast to the closed system, where when the particle shell is liquid, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had little to no impact on the equilibrium timescale. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for an open system with bulk diffusivity in the shell ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Even when the shell is in a liquid state, simulating an open system leads to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 orders of magnitude higher than that in the closed system when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consistent with the closed system, there is little effect of diffusivity on the equilibration timescale in an open system when the particle shell is less viscous with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Broader impacts</title>
      <p id="d1e3633">The model simulations and analysis undoubtedly show the complex effects and interplay of non-ideality, particle phase state, and properties of the condensing species on equilibration timescales of SOA partitioning. Experimental techniques to investigate equilibration timescales rarely probe the mixing state of the aerosol population and can often only measure the total particle composition without information on particle morphology and potential concentration gradients within the particle.
In this study we have demonstrated how concentration gradients can exist within the particle long after the particle as a whole has achieved equilibrium with the gas phase, particularly under circumstances where the shell is able to hold large amounts of the condensing species with low volatility or a low activity coefficient in the shell. This may have impacts on heterogeneous chemistry as under these circumstances much more of the condensing species is available at or near surface bulk than would be predicted assuming equilibrium partitioning.</p>
      <p id="d1e3636">This work can provide useful insights into some previous experimental work.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.33"/> observed that when toluene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA are condensed sequentially on seed particles, the evaporation behavior is as if only SOA from the second precursor were present, consistent with the core–shell structure in particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.34"/>. This then leads to minimal evaporation when the toluene SOA coats the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA, as very little evaporation of the toluene SOA was observed when it was the only constituent in the particle.
If the activity coefficient of a condensing species in the shell phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">shell</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is low, then this condition can lead to long equilibration timescales in the whole semisolid particle, as transport to the core is slow.
As suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.35"/>, the coating of the second precursor may be caused by non-ideal mixing effects leading to phase separation or just very slow diffusivity and neither can be entirely ruled out.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.36"/> estimated an upper bound on the diffusivity in toluene SOA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on an evaporation timescale longer than 14 h.
Assuming an activity coefficient of a condensing species in toluene SOA of 1, in the simulations done here, the total particle equilibrium would be achieved in about 3 h (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a), but the core equilibrated much more slowly on the order of about 1 d (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b).
However, a similarly long equilibration timescale of the core can be achieved using an activity coefficient of 10 in the shell and a diffusivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b).
Even with a diffusivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, equilibrium in the core would not be achieved in 14 h with an activity coefficient of 10 in the shell (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b).</p>
      <p id="d1e3804">Experimental work to probe timescales of particle–particle mixing has also been conducted by mixing two populations of particles.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.37"/> showed that below 20 % RH, toluene SOA does not mix appreciably but mixes readily with a deuterated toluene SOA population at higher RH.
They also showed that even at low RH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA mixes with D-toluene SOA within 1 h.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.38"/> extended this to include different SOA populations from isoprene, limonene, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene.
While the semi-volatile organic compound (SVOC) components of isoprene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA mix rapidly in the presence of another SOA population, they showed that in some cases the properties of the other SOA population can inhibit this rapid mixing as in the case of toluene SOA mixing with limonene or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene SOA.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.39"/> observed mixing between erythritol-coated black carbon and sugar-coated ammonium sulfate.
When using a small (and presumably less viscous) sugar under high RH and temperature conditions, the erythritol achieves a steady state in the sugar-coated ammonium sulfate population in minutes.
When these conditions are changed to increase the viscosity of the particles (lower RH, lower temperature, and larger sugars), equilibrium is prolonged to a few hours.
Here we discuss in detail a few cases where the results of this work may help explain some findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.40"/>.
However, in this work we have only simulated one particle population, and thus our interpretation is limited.
Future work will focus on simulating two particle populations to represent these results.</p>
      <p id="d1e3848"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.41"/> observed that when mixing toluene SOA and limonene SOA, the limonene SOA initially took up a substantial amount of the toluene SOA, leading to the limonene SOA containing 15 % toluene SOA almost immediately, but that was followed by much slower uptake for the next 3 h <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.42"/>. This could be evidence of the overshooting behavior as seen in this work, where the equilibrium (or steady-state) concentration is achieved rapidly as the shell layers are able to accommodate a large amount of the condensing material due to the low volatility of the condensing species and/or non-ideal mixing with a low activity coefficient. If diffusivity within the particle is slow, the large concentration gradient in the particle will dissipate slowly leading to slow continuous uptake of the gas phase until the full equilibrium is achieved.</p>
      <p id="d1e3857">In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.43"/> performed experiments to show that even at high RH, mass exchange between SOA populations derived from toluene and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene SOA remained very low, despite both SOA populations containing significant fractions of semi-volatile species.
In addition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene SOA has been shown to have low viscosity at high RH, without inhibiting the timescale for mixing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.44"/>.
Therefore, this slow mixing could be explained by low miscibility between the two SOA populations. In this case, equilibrium may be achieved rapidly, but very little mass actually ends up mixing with the other population.
As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c, if the activity coefficient in the shell is high, the shell will achieve equilibrium rapidly even if the shell is viscous. Therefore, there was likely an activity barrier to the populations mixing at high RH as observed in their experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3891">We have conducted simulations to address the complex effect of non-ideal mixing and particle phase state on equilibration timescales of semi-volatile species into a core–shell particle. This effect is investigated by varying the bulk diffusivity in the particle shell to cover different particle phase states from liquid and semisolid to amorphous solid and varying the activity coefficient of the condensing species in the shell.
We found that the particle can achieve equilibrium with the gas phase long before the particle itself has reached full equilibrium without concentration gradients, especially when the gas-phase species is preferentially miscible with the shell.
If the condensing species is immiscible with the shell phase, the shell rapidly reaches quasi-equilibrium or steady state with the gas phase, while the full equilibrium in the core, the shell as a whole, and the whole particle with the gas phase is achieved much more slowly.
If the condensing species is favorably miscible with the shell, the total particle equilibrium will reflect the equilibrium between the shell and gas phase, but the dissolution of concentration gradients in the shell and the equilibration of the core will take much longer when the shell is highly viscous with low bulk diffusivity.
We have also shown that comparing these simulations to experimental work may help to reconcile apparent discrepancies between experimental observations of fast particle–particle mixing and predictions of long mixing timescales in viscous particles based on viscosity measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e3894">Here we have shown that non-ideality, viscosity, and volatility all impact equilibration timescales and that combining these effects can lead to similar equilibration timescales due to their complex interplay.
For example, we would expect that a semisolid particle with very high viscosity would equilibrate with a gas phase slowly.
In some circumstances, however, equilibrium can also be achieved rapidly for a condensing species with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or an immiscible species with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Experimental work to probe the equilibrium timescales of semi-volatile species has focused on mixing two particle populations.
Thus, to compare these results to experimental results, we must consider both the parameters affecting transport through and evaporation from one population as well as condensation and subsequent transport through a second population of aerosol, which is planned for future work.</p>
      <p id="d1e3915">Large-scale models often assume both instantaneous equilibrium between a surrounding gas phase and aerosol particles, which are ideally well-mixed liquids independent of the physical properties of those systems.
We show that these assumptions are justified in cases where the particle phase is liquid and non-ideal mixing has slight impacts on equilibration timescale between the gas phase and the particle. If the particle is viscous, condensation of miscible species in the shell can prevent mass transport to the core, prolonging equilibration timescales of full internal mixing and equilibrium of the particle with the gas phase.
Hence, poor representation of particle phase state and internal mixing state can lead to overestimation of particle growth as well as heterogeneous and multiphase chemistry.</p>
      <p id="d1e3918">We have only considered monodispersed particles and a low gas-phase concentration of the condensing species so that the size of the particle remains constant throughout any simulations. Future work should consider the combined effect of phase state and non-ideality on poly-dispersed particles on the evolution of particle size distribution in atmospherically relevant concentrations and conditions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3925">The simulation data may be obtained from the
corresponding author upon request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3931">Both authors designed research, developed model codes, and wrote the paper. MSc conducted simulations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3937">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3946">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3952">We thank the U.S. National Science Foundation (AGS-1654104), the U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0022139), and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (MOCCIE 3, G-2020-13912) for funding.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3957">This research has been supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. AGS-1654104), the U.S. Department of Energy (grant no. DE-SC0022139), and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (grant no. G-2020-13912).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3963">This paper was edited by Barbara Ervens and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chang and Pankow(2006)}}?><label>Chang and Pankow(2006)</label><?label chang.atmenv.2006?><mixed-citation>Chang, E. I. and Pankow, J. F.: Prediction of activity coefficients in liquid
aerosol particles containing organic compounds, dissolved inorganic salts,
and water – Part 2: Consideration of phase separation effects by an X-UNIFAC
model, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6422–6436,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.031</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cummings et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Cummings et al.(2020)</label><?label cummings.envsciPI.2020?><mixed-citation>Cummings, B. E., Li, Y., DeCarlo, P. F., Shiraiwa, M., and Waring, M. S.:
Indoor aerosol water content and phase state in U.S. residences: impacts of
relative humidity, aerosol mass and composition, and mechanical system
operation, Environ. Sci.-Proc. Imp., 22, 2031–2057,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00122H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D0EM00122H</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Donahue et~al.(2006)}}?><label>Donahue et al.(2006)</label><?label donahue.est.2006?><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052297c</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Freedman(2017)}}?><label>Freedman(2017)</label><?label freedman.chemsocrev.2017?><mixed-citation>Freedman, M. A.: Phase separation in organic aerosol, Chem. Soc. Rev., 46,
7694–7705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00783J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C6CS00783J</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Freedman(2020)}}?><label>Freedman(2020)</label><?label freedman.acr.2020?><mixed-citation>Freedman, M. A.: Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation in Supermicrometer and
Submicrometer Aerosol Particles, Accounts Chem. Res., 53,
1102–1110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00093</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gkatzelis et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Gkatzelis et al.(2021)</label><?label gkatzelis.grl.2021?><mixed-citation>Gkatzelis, G. I., Papanastasiou, D. K., Karydis, V. A., Hohaus, T., Liu, Y.,
Schmitt, S. H., Schlag, P., Fuchs, H., Novelli, A., Chen, Q., Cheng, X.,
Broch, S., Dong, H., Holland, F., Li, X., Liu, Y., Ma, X., Reimer, D.,
Rohrer, F., Shao, M., Tan, Z., Taraborrelli, D., Tillmann, R., Wang, H.,
Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Wu, Z., Zeng, L., Zheng, J., Hu, M., Lu, K., Hofzumahaus,
A., Zhang, Y., Wahner, A., and Kiendler-Scharr, A.: Uptake of Water-soluble
Gas-phase Oxidation Products Drives Organic Particulate Pollution in Beijing,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091351,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL091351</ext-link>,  2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gorkowski et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Gorkowski et al.(2020)</label><?label gorkowski.chem.2020?><mixed-citation>Gorkowski, K., Donahue, N. M., and Sullivan, R. C.: Aerosol Optical Tweezers
Constrain the Morphology Evolution of Liquid-Liquid Phase-Separated
Atmospheric Particles, Chem, 6, 204–220,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.10.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chempr.2019.10.018</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Habib and Donahue(2022)}}?><label>Habib and Donahue(2022)</label><?label habib.envsciatm.2022?><mixed-citation>Habib, L. and Donahue, N.: Single particle measurements of mixing between
mimics for biomass burning and aged secondary organic aerosols, Environ.
Sci.-Atmos., 2, 727–737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00017B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D2EA00017B</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{He et~al.(2021)}}?><label>He et al.(2021)</label><?label he.est.2021?><mixed-citation>He, Y., Akherati, A., Nah, T., Ng, N. L., Garofalo, L. A., Farmer, D. K.,
Shiraiwa, M., Zaveri, R. A., Cappa, C. D., Pierce, J. R., and Jathar, S. H.:
Particle Size Distribution Dynamics Can Help Constrain the Phase State of
Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55,
1466–1476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05796" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c05796</ext-link>,  2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Huang et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Huang et al.(2021)</label><?label huang.pnas.2021?><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Mahrt, F., Xu, S., Shiraiwa, M., Zuend, A., and Bertram, A. K.:
Coexistence of three liquid phases in individual atmospheric aerosol
particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 118,
e2102512118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102512118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2102512118</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hyttinen et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Hyttinen et al.(2020)</label><?label hyttinen.acp.2020?><mixed-citation>Hyttinen, N., Heshmatnezhad, R., Elm, J., Kurtén, T., and Prisle, N. L.: Technical note: Estimating aqueous solubilities and activity coefficients of mono- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarboxylic acids using COSMO<italic>therm</italic>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13131–13143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13131-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-13131-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jimenez et~al.(2009)}}?><label>Jimenez et al.(2009)</label><?label jimenez.science.2009?><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun,
Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J., Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R.,
Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann,
S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R.,
Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang,
Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C.,
Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb,
C. E., Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols
in the Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Julin et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Julin et al.(2014)</label><?label julin.est.2014?><mixed-citation>Julin, J., Winkler, P. M., Donahue, N. M., Wagner, P. E., and Riipinen, I.:
Near-Unity Mass Accommodation Coefficient of Organic Molecules of Varying
Structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12083–12089,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es501816h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es501816h</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lam et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Lam et al.(2019)</label><?label lam.acp.2019?><mixed-citation>Lam, H. K., Shum, S. M., Davies, J. F., Song, M., Zuend, A., and Chan, M. N.: Effects of inorganic salts on the heterogeneous OH oxidation of organic compounds: insights from methylglutaric acid–ammonium sulfate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9581–9593, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9581-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-9581-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lei et~al.(2022)}}?><label>Lei et al.(2022)</label><?label lei.acsesc.2022?><mixed-citation>Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lambe, A. T., Zhang, J., White,
N. J., Atkin, J. M., Banaszak Holl, M. M., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Surratt,
J. D., and Ault, A. P.: Morphology and Viscosity Changes after Reactive
Uptake of Isoprene Epoxydiols in Submicrometer Phase Separated Particles with
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formed from Different Volatile Organic Compounds,
ACS Earth Space Chem., 6, 871–882,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00156</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Li and Shiraiwa(2019)}}?><label>Li and Shiraiwa(2019)</label><?label li.acp.2019?><mixed-citation>Li, Y. and Shiraiwa, M.: Timescales of secondary organic aerosols to reach equilibrium at various temperatures and relative humidities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5959–5971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5959-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-5959-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Li et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Li et al.(2021)</label><?label li.acsesc.2021?><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Carlton, A. G., and Shiraiwa, M.: Diurnal and Seasonal Variations in
the Phase State of Secondary Organic Aerosol Material over the Contiguous US
Simulated in CMAQ, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 1971–1982,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00094" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00094</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Liu et al.(2020)</label><?label liu.estl.2020?><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Day, D. A., Krechmer, J. E., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Determining Activity Coefficients of SOA from Isothermal Evaporation in a
Laboratory Chamber, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 8, 212–217,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00888" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00888</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Loza et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Loza et al.(2013)</label><?label loza.est.2013?><mixed-citation>Loza, C. L., Coggon, M. M., Nguyen, T. B., Zuend, A., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: On the Mixing and Evaporation of Secondary Organic Aerosol
Components, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6173–6180,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400979k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400979k</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Maclean et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Maclean et al.(2021)</label><?label maclean.easchem.2021?><mixed-citation>Maclean, A. M., Smith, N. R., Li, Y., Huang, Y., Hettiyadura, A. P. S.,
Crescenzo, G. V., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, A., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Bertram,
A. K.: Humidity-Dependent Viscosity of Secondary Organic Aerosol from
Ozonolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Caryophyllene: Measurements, Predictions, and Implications,
ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 305–318,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00296</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mai et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Mai et al.(2015)</label><?label mai.est.2015?><mixed-citation>Mai, H., Shiraiwa, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Under What
Conditions Can Equilibrium Gas–Particle Partitioning Be Expected to Hold in
the Atmosphere?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 11485–11491,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b02587</ext-link>,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mu et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Mu et al.(2018)</label><?label mu.sciadv.2018?><mixed-citation>Mu, Q., Shiraiwa, M., Octaviani, M., Ma, N., Ding, A., Su, H., Lammel, G.,
Pöschl, U., and Cheng, Y.: Temperature effect on phase state and reactivity
controls atmospheric multiphase chemistry and transport of PAHs, Sci.
Adv., 4, eaap7314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap7314" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aap7314</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Oak et~al.(2022)}}?><label>Oak et al.(2022)</label><?label oak.james.2022?><mixed-citation>Oak, Y. J., Park, R. J., Jo, D. S., Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost,
P., Nault, B. A., Kim, H., Kim, H., Ha, E. S., Song, C.-K., Yi, S.-M.,
Diskin, G. S., Weinheimer, A. J., Blake, D. R., Wisthaler, A., Shim, M., and
Shin, Y.: Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Simulations for
Seoul, Korea, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14,
e2021MS002760, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002760" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021MS002760</ext-link>,
2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Olson et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Olson et al.(2019)</label><?label olson.eschem.2019?><mixed-citation>Olson, N. E., Lei, Z., Craig, R. L., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lambe, A. T., Zhang,
Z., Gold, A., Surratt, J. D., and Ault, A. P.: Reactive Uptake of Isoprene
Epoxydiols Increases the Viscosity of the Core of Phase-Separated Aerosol
Particles, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 1402–1414,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00138</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{O'Meara et~al.(2016)}}?><label>O'Meara et al.(2016)</label><?label omeara.acp.2016?><mixed-citation>O'Meara, S., Topping, D. O., and McFiggans, G.: The rate of equilibration of viscous aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5299–5313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5299-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5299-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Perraud et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Perraud et al.(2012)</label><?label perraud.pnas.2012?><mixed-citation>Perraud, V., Bruns, E. A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu, Y., Alexander,
M. L., Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D., Chang, W. L., Dabdub, D., Pankow, J. F., and
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Nonequilibrium atmospheric secondary organic aerosol
formation and growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109,
2836–2841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119909109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1119909109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pöhlker et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Pöhlker et al.(2012)</label><?label pohlker.science.2012?><mixed-citation>Pöhlker, C., Wiedemann, K. T., Sinha, B., Shiraiwa, M., Gunthe, S. S., Smith,
M., Su, H., Artaxo, P., Chen, Q., Cheng, Y., Elbert, W., Gilles, M. K.,
Kilcoyne, A. L. D., Moffet, R. C., Weigand, M., Martin, S. T., Pöschl, U.,
and Andreae, M. O.: Biogenic potassium salt particles as seeds for secondary
organic aerosol in the Amazon, Science, 337, 1075–1078,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223264" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1223264</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rasool et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Rasool et al.(2021)</label><?label rasool.easchem.2021?><mixed-citation>Rasool, Q. Z., Shrivastava, M., Octaviani, M., Zhao, B., Gaudet, B., and Liu,
Y.: Modeling Volatility-Based Aerosol Phase State Predictions in the Amazon
Rainforest, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 2910–2924,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00255" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00255</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Reid et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Reid et al.(2018)</label><?label reid.natcomm.2018?><mixed-citation>Reid, J. P., Bertram, A. K., Topping, D. O., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T.,
Petters, M. D., Pope, F. D., and Rovelli, G.: The viscosity of
atmospherically relevant organic particles, Nat. Commun., 9, 956,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03027-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-03027-z</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Renbaum-Wolff et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Renbaum-Wolff et al.(2013)</label><?label renbaumwolff.pnas.2013?><mixed-citation>Renbaum-Wolff, L., Grayson, J. W., Bateman, A. P., Kuwata, M., Sellier, M.,
Murray, B. J., Shilling, J. E., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.: Viscosity
of α-pinene secondary organic material and implications for particle growth
and reactivity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 8014–8019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219548110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1219548110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riemer et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Riemer et al.(2019)</label><?label riemer.revgeo.2019?><mixed-citation>Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol
Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57,
187–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018RG000615</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Riipinen et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Riipinen et al.(2011)</label><?label riipinen.acp.2011?><mixed-citation>Riipinen, I., Pierce, J. R., Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Häkkinen, S., Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Petäjä, T., Slowik, J., Chang, R., Shantz, N. C., Abbatt, J., Leaitch, W. R., Kerminen, V.-M., Worsnop, D. R., Pandis, S. N., Donahue, N. M., and Kulmala, M.: Organic condensation: a vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3865–3878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Robinson et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Robinson et al.(2013)</label><?label robinson.jphyschem.2013?><mixed-citation>Robinson, E. S., Saleh, R., and Donahue, N. M.: Organic Aerosol Mixing Observed
by Single-Particle Mass Spectrometry, J. Phys. Chem. A,
117, 13935–13945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp405789t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp405789t</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Saleh et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Saleh et al.(2013)</label><?label saleh.est.2013?><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Donahue, N., and Robinson, A.: Time Scales for Gas-Particle
Partitioning Equilibration of Secondary Organic Aerosol Formed from
Alpha-Pinene Ozonolysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5588–5594,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400078d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400078d</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schmedding et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Schmedding et al.(2020)</label><?label schmedding.acp.2020?><mixed-citation>Schmedding, R., Rasool, Q. Z., Zhang, Y., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Surratt, J. D., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Thornton, J. A., Goldstein, A. H., and Vizuete, W.: Predicting secondary organic aerosol phase state and viscosity and its effect on multiphase chemistry in a regional-scale air quality model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8201–8225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8201-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-8201-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shiraiwa and Seinfeld(2012)}}?><label>Shiraiwa and Seinfeld(2012)</label><?label shiraiwa.grl.2012?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Equilibration timescale of atmospheric
secondary organic aerosol partitioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24801,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL054008</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shiraiwa et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2011)</label><?label shiraiwa.pnas.2011?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Gas uptake and chemical
aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 11003–11008, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1103045108</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shiraiwa et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2012)</label><?label shiraiwa.acp.2012?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Pfrang, C., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Kinetic multi-layer model of gas-particle interactions in aerosols and clouds (KM-GAP): linking condensation, evaporation and chemical reactions of organics, oxidants and water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2777–2794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2777-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-2777-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shiraiwa et~al.(2013a)}}?><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2013a)</label><?label shiraiwa.pnas.2013?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Yee, L. D., Schilling, K. A., Loza, C. L., Craven, J. S., Zuend,
A., Ziemann, P. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Size distribution dynamics reveal
particle-phase chemistry in organic aerosol formation, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 11746–11750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307501110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1307501110</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shiraiwa et~al.(2013b)}}?><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2013b)</label><?label shiraiwa.pccp.2013?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Zuend, A., Bertram, A. K., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas–particle
partitioning of atmospheric aerosols: interplay of physical state,
non-ideal mixing and morphology, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15,
11441–11453, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51595H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3CP51595H</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shiraiwa et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2014)</label><?label shiraiwa.acp.2014?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Berkemeier, T., Schilling-Fahnestock, K. A., Seinfeld, J. H., and Pöschl, U.: Molecular corridors and kinetic regimes in the multiphase chemical evolution of secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8323–8341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8323-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-8323-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shiraiwa et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2017)</label><?label shiraiwa.natcomm.2017?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Li, Y., Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Berkemeier, T., Pandis,
S. N., Lelieveld, J., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Global distribution of
particle phase state in atmospheric secondary organic aerosols, Nat.
Commun., 8, 15002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms15002</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shrivastava et~al.(2017a)}}?><label>Shrivastava et al.(2017a)</label><?label shrivastava.revgeo.2017?><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B.,
Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T.,
Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J.,
Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R.,
Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding
secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000540</ext-link>,
2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shrivastava et~al.(2017b)}}?><label>Shrivastava et al.(2017b)</label><?label shirvastava.pnas.2017?><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Lou, S., Zelenyuk, A., Easter, R. C., Corley, R. A., Thrall,
B. D., Rasch, P. J., Fast, J. D., Simonich, S. L. M., Shen, H., and Tao, S.:
Global long-range transport and lung cancer risk from polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons shielded by coatings of organic aerosol, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 1246–1251, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618475114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1618475114</ext-link>,
2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shrivastava et~al.(2022)}}?><label>Shrivastava et al.(2022)</label><?label shrivastava.eschem.2022?><mixed-citation>Shrivastava, M., Rasool, Q. Z., Zhao, B., Octaviani, M., Zaveri,
R. A., Zelenyuk, A., Gaudet, B., Liu, Y., Shilling, J. E.,
Schneider, J., Schulz, C., Zöger, M., Martin, S. T., Ye, J.,
Guenther, A., Souza, R. F., Wendisch, M., and Pöschl, U.: Tight
Coupling of Surface and In-Plant Biochemistry and Convection Governs Key Fine
Particulate Components over the Amazon Rainforest, ACS Earth  Space
Chem., 6, 380–390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00356</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Song et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Song et al.(2012)</label><?label song.grl.2012?><mixed-citation>Song, M., Marcolli, C., Krieger, U. K., Zuend, A., and Peter, T.: Liquid-liquid
phase separation in aerosol particles: Dependence on O : C, organic
functionalities, and compositional complexity, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, L19801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052807</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Song et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Song et al.(2017)</label><?label song.acp.2017?><mixed-citation>Song, M., Liu, P., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.: Liquid–liquid phase separation in particles containing secondary organic material free of inorganic salts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11261–11271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11261-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-11261-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tikkanen et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Tikkanen et al.(2020)</label><?label tikkanen.acp.2020?><mixed-citation>Tikkanen, O.-P., Buchholz, A., Ylisirniö, A., Schobesberger, S., Virtanen, A., and Yli-Juuti, T.: Comparing secondary organic aerosol (SOA) volatility distributions derived from isothermal SOA particle evaporation data and FIGAERO–CIMS measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10441–10458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10441-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-10441-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vaden et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Vaden et al.(2011)</label><?label vaden.pnas.2011?><mixed-citation>Vaden, T. D., Imre, D., Beránek, J., Shrivastava, M., and Zelenyuk, A.:
Evaporation kinetics and phase of laboratory and ambient secondary organic
aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 2190–2195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013391108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1013391108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Virtanen et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Virtanen et al.(2010)</label><?label virtanen.nature.2010?><mixed-citation>Virtanen, A., Joutsensaari, J., Koop, T., Kannosto, J., Yli-Pirilä, P.,
Leskinen, J., Mäkelä, J. M., Holopainen, J. K., Pöschl, U., Kulmala, M.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Laaksonen, A.: An amorphous solid state of biogenic
secondary organic aerosol particles, Nature, 467, 824–827,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09455" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature09455</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{von Domaros et~al.(2020)}}?><label>von Domaros et al.(2020)</label><?label vondomaros.jphyschem.2020?><mixed-citation>von Domaros, M., Lakey, P. S. J., Shiraiwa, M., and Tobias, D. J.: Multiscale
Modeling of Human Skin Oil-Induced Indoor Air Chemistry:
Combining Kinetic Models and Molecular Dynamics,  J.
Phys. Chem. B, 124, 3836–3843, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c02818" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c02818</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ye et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Ye et al.(2016)</label><?label ye.pnas.2016?><mixed-citation>Ye, Q., Robinson, E. S., Ding, X., Ye, P., Sullivan, R. C., and Donahue, N. M.:
Mixing of secondary organic aerosols versus relative humidity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 12649–12654,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604536113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1604536113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ye et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Ye et al.(2018)</label><?label ye.chem.2018?><mixed-citation>Ye, Q., Upshur, M. A., Robinson, E. S., Geiger, F. M., Sullivan, R. C.,
Thomson, R. J., and Donahue, N. M.: Following Particle-Particle Mixing in
Atmospheric Secondary Organic Aerosols by Using Isotopically Labeled
Terpenes, Chem, 4, 318–333,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.008</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ylisirni\"{o} et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Ylisirniö et al.(2020)</label><?label ylisirnio.acp.2020?><mixed-citation>Ylisirniö, A., Buchholz, A., Mohr, C., Li, Z., Barreira, L., Lambe, A., Faiola, C., Kari, E., Yli-Juuti, T., Nizkorodov, S. A., Worsnop, D. R., Virtanen, A., and Schobesberger, S.: Composition and volatility of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formed from oxidation of real tree emissions compared to simplified volatile organic compound (VOC) systems , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5629–5644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5629-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-5629-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{You et~al.(2014)}}?><label>You et al.(2014)</label><?label you.intrevphyschem.2014?><mixed-citation>You, Y., Smith, M. L., Song, M., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.:
Liquid–liquid phase separation in atmospherically relevant particles
consisting of organic species and inorganic salts, Int. Rev.
Phys. Chem., 33, 43–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0144235X.2014.890786" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/0144235X.2014.890786</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zaveri et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Zaveri et al.(2020)</label><?label zaveri.est.2020?><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Shilling, J. E., Zelenyuk, A., Zawadowicz, M. A., Suski, K.,
China, S., Bell, D. M., Veghte, D., and Laskin, A.: Particle-Phase Diffusion
Modulates Partitioning of Semivolatile Organic Compounds to Aged Secondary
Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 2595–2605,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05514" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b05514</ext-link>,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zaveri et~al.(2022)}}?><label>Zaveri et al.(2022)</label><?label zaveri.sciadv.2022?><mixed-citation>Zaveri, R. A., Wang, J., Fan, J., Zhang, Y., Shilling, J. E., Zelenyuk, A.,
Mei, F., Newsom, R., Pekour, M., Tomlinson, J., Comstock, J. M., Shrivastava,
M., Fortner, E., Machado, L. A. T., Artaxo, P., and Martin, S. T.: Rapid
growth of anthropogenic organic nanoparticles greatly alters cloud life cycle
in the Amazon rainforest, Sci. Adv., 8, eabj0329,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj0329" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abj0329</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhang et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Zhang et al.(2018)</label><?label zhang.est.2018?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lambe, A. T., Olson, N. E., Lei, Z., Craig, R. L., Zhang,
Z., Gold, A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Gaston, C. J.,
Thornton, J. A., Vizuete, W., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Effect of the
Aerosol-Phase State on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from the Reactive
Uptake of Isoprene-Derived Epoxydiols (IEPOX), Environ. Sci.
Tech. Let., 5, 167–174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zhou et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Zhou et al.(2013)</label><?label zhou.farraday.2013?><mixed-citation>Zhou, S., Shiraiwa, M., McWhinney, R. D., Pöschl, U., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Kinetic limitations in gas-particle reactions arising from slow diffusion in
secondary organic aerosol, Faraday Discuss., 165, 391–406,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00030C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3FD00030C</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zobrist et~al.(2008)}}?><label>Zobrist et al.(2008)</label><?label zobrist.acp.2008?><mixed-citation>Zobrist, B., Marcolli, C., Pedernera, D. A., and Koop, T.: Do atmospheric aerosols form glasses?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5221–5244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5221-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5221-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zuend and Seinfeld(2012)}}?><label>Zuend and Seinfeld(2012)</label><?label zuend.acp.2012?><mixed-citation>Zuend, A. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Modeling the gas-particle partitioning of secondary organic aerosol: the importance of liquid-liquid phase separation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3857–3882, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3857-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-3857-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zuend et~al.(2008)}}?><label>Zuend et al.(2008)</label><?label zuend.acp.2008?><mixed-citation>Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Luo, B. P., and Peter, T.: A thermodynamic model of mixed organic-inorganic aerosols to predict activity coefficients, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4559–4593, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008</ext-link>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zuend et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Zuend et al.(2011)</label><?label zuend.acp.2011?><mixed-citation>Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Booth, A. M., Lienhard, D. M., Soonsin, V., Krieger, U. K., Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G., Peter, T., and Seinfeld, J. H.: New and extended parameterization of the thermodynamic model AIOMFAC: calculation of activity coefficients for organic-inorganic mixtures containing carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl, ether, ester, alkenyl, alkyl, and aromatic functional groups, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9155–9206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Impact of phase state and non-ideal  mixing on equilibration timescales of  secondary organic aerosol partitioning</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Chang and Pankow(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, E. I. and Pankow, J. F.: Prediction of activity coefficients in liquid
aerosol particles containing organic compounds, dissolved inorganic salts,
and water – Part 2: Consideration of phase separation effects by an X-UNIFAC
model, Atmos. Environ., 40, 6422–6436,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.031</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Cummings et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Cummings, B. E., Li, Y., DeCarlo, P. F., Shiraiwa, M., and Waring, M. S.:
Indoor aerosol water content and phase state in U.S. residences: impacts of
relative humidity, aerosol mass and composition, and mechanical system
operation, Environ. Sci.-Proc. Imp., 22, 2031–2057,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00122H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00122H</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Donahue et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., Stanier, C. O., and Pandis, S. N.: Coupled
Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2635–2643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052297c</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Freedman(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Freedman, M. A.: Phase separation in organic aerosol, Chem. Soc. Rev., 46,
7694–7705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00783J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00783J</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Freedman(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Freedman, M. A.: Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation in Supermicrometer and
Submicrometer Aerosol Particles, Accounts Chem. Res., 53,
1102–1110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00093</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Gkatzelis et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Gkatzelis, G. I., Papanastasiou, D. K., Karydis, V. A., Hohaus, T., Liu, Y.,
Schmitt, S. H., Schlag, P., Fuchs, H., Novelli, A., Chen, Q., Cheng, X.,
Broch, S., Dong, H., Holland, F., Li, X., Liu, Y., Ma, X., Reimer, D.,
Rohrer, F., Shao, M., Tan, Z., Taraborrelli, D., Tillmann, R., Wang, H.,
Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Wu, Z., Zeng, L., Zheng, J., Hu, M., Lu, K., Hofzumahaus,
A., Zhang, Y., Wahner, A., and Kiendler-Scharr, A.: Uptake of Water-soluble
Gas-phase Oxidation Products Drives Organic Particulate Pollution in Beijing,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091351,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091351</a>,  2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Gorkowski et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Gorkowski, K., Donahue, N. M., and Sullivan, R. C.: Aerosol Optical Tweezers
Constrain the Morphology Evolution of Liquid-Liquid Phase-Separated
Atmospheric Particles, Chem, 6, 204–220,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.10.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.10.018</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Habib and Donahue(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Habib, L. and Donahue, N.: Single particle measurements of mixing between
mimics for biomass burning and aged secondary organic aerosols, Environ.
Sci.-Atmos., 2, 727–737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00017B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00017B</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>He et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
He, Y., Akherati, A., Nah, T., Ng, N. L., Garofalo, L. A., Farmer, D. K.,
Shiraiwa, M., Zaveri, R. A., Cappa, C. D., Pierce, J. R., and Jathar, S. H.:
Particle Size Distribution Dynamics Can Help Constrain the Phase State of
Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55,
1466–1476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05796" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05796</a>,  2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Huang et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y., Mahrt, F., Xu, S., Shiraiwa, M., Zuend, A., and Bertram, A. K.:
Coexistence of three liquid phases in individual atmospheric aerosol
particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 118,
e2102512118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102512118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102512118</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Hyttinen et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Hyttinen, N., Heshmatnezhad, R., Elm, J., Kurtén, T., and Prisle, N. L.: Technical note: Estimating aqueous solubilities and activity coefficients of mono- and <i>α</i>,<i>ω</i>-dicarboxylic acids using COSMO<i>therm</i>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13131–13143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13131-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13131-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Jimenez et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun,
Y. L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J., Dunlea, J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R.,
Williams, P. I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann,
S., Weimer, S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R.,
Takami, A., Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang,
Y. M., Dzepina, K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C.,
Trimborn, A. M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb,
C. E., Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols
in the Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525–1529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Julin et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Julin, J., Winkler, P. M., Donahue, N. M., Wagner, P. E., and Riipinen, I.:
Near-Unity Mass Accommodation Coefficient of Organic Molecules of Varying
Structure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12083–12089,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es501816h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es501816h</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Lam et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Lam, H. K., Shum, S. M., Davies, J. F., Song, M., Zuend, A., and Chan, M. N.: Effects of inorganic salts on the heterogeneous OH oxidation of organic compounds: insights from methylglutaric acid–ammonium sulfate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9581–9593, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9581-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9581-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Lei et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lambe, A. T., Zhang, J., White,
N. J., Atkin, J. M., Banaszak Holl, M. M., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Surratt,
J. D., and Ault, A. P.: Morphology and Viscosity Changes after Reactive
Uptake of Isoprene Epoxydiols in Submicrometer Phase Separated Particles with
Secondary Organic Aerosol Formed from Different Volatile Organic Compounds,
ACS Earth Space Chem., 6, 871–882,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00156</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Li and Shiraiwa(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. and Shiraiwa, M.: Timescales of secondary organic aerosols to reach equilibrium at various temperatures and relative humidities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5959–5971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5959-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5959-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Li et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Carlton, A. G., and Shiraiwa, M.: Diurnal and Seasonal Variations in
the Phase State of Secondary Organic Aerosol Material over the Contiguous US
Simulated in CMAQ, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 1971–1982,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00094" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00094</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Liu et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X., Day, D. A., Krechmer, J. E., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Determining Activity Coefficients of SOA from Isothermal Evaporation in a
Laboratory Chamber, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 8, 212–217,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00888" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00888</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Loza et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Loza, C. L., Coggon, M. M., Nguyen, T. B., Zuend, A., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: On the Mixing and Evaporation of Secondary Organic Aerosol
Components, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6173–6180,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400979k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400979k</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Maclean et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Maclean, A. M., Smith, N. R., Li, Y., Huang, Y., Hettiyadura, A. P. S.,
Crescenzo, G. V., Shiraiwa, M., Laskin, A., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Bertram,
A. K.: Humidity-Dependent Viscosity of Secondary Organic Aerosol from
Ozonolysis of <i>β</i>-Caryophyllene: Measurements, Predictions, and Implications,
ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 305–318,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00296</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Mai et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Mai, H., Shiraiwa, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Under What
Conditions Can Equilibrium Gas–Particle Partitioning Be Expected to Hold in
the Atmosphere?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 11485–11491,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02587" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02587</a>,  2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Mu et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Mu, Q., Shiraiwa, M., Octaviani, M., Ma, N., Ding, A., Su, H., Lammel, G.,
Pöschl, U., and Cheng, Y.: Temperature effect on phase state and reactivity
controls atmospheric multiphase chemistry and transport of PAHs, Sci.
Adv., 4, eaap7314, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap7314" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap7314</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Oak et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Oak, Y. J., Park, R. J., Jo, D. S., Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost,
P., Nault, B. A., Kim, H., Kim, H., Ha, E. S., Song, C.-K., Yi, S.-M.,
Diskin, G. S., Weinheimer, A. J., Blake, D. R., Wisthaler, A., Shim, M., and
Shin, Y.: Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Simulations for
Seoul, Korea, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14,
e2021MS002760, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002760" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002760</a>,
2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Olson et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Olson, N. E., Lei, Z., Craig, R. L., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lambe, A. T., Zhang,
Z., Gold, A., Surratt, J. D., and Ault, A. P.: Reactive Uptake of Isoprene
Epoxydiols Increases the Viscosity of the Core of Phase-Separated Aerosol
Particles, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 1402–1414,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00138</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>O'Meara et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
O'Meara, S., Topping, D. O., and McFiggans, G.: The rate of equilibration of viscous aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5299–5313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5299-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5299-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Perraud et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Perraud, V., Bruns, E. A., Ezell, M. J., Johnson, S. N., Yu, Y., Alexander,
M. L., Zelenyuk, A., Imre, D., Chang, W. L., Dabdub, D., Pankow, J. F., and
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Nonequilibrium atmospheric secondary organic aerosol
formation and growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109,
2836–2841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119909109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119909109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Pöhlker et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Pöhlker, C., Wiedemann, K. T., Sinha, B., Shiraiwa, M., Gunthe, S. S., Smith,
M., Su, H., Artaxo, P., Chen, Q., Cheng, Y., Elbert, W., Gilles, M. K.,
Kilcoyne, A. L. D., Moffet, R. C., Weigand, M., Martin, S. T., Pöschl, U.,
and Andreae, M. O.: Biogenic potassium salt particles as seeds for secondary
organic aerosol in the Amazon, Science, 337, 1075–1078,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223264" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223264</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Rasool et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Rasool, Q. Z., Shrivastava, M., Octaviani, M., Zhao, B., Gaudet, B., and Liu,
Y.: Modeling Volatility-Based Aerosol Phase State Predictions in the Amazon
Rainforest, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 2910–2924,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00255" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00255</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Reid et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, J. P., Bertram, A. K., Topping, D. O., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T.,
Petters, M. D., Pope, F. D., and Rovelli, G.: The viscosity of
atmospherically relevant organic particles, Nat. Commun., 9, 956,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03027-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03027-z</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Renbaum-Wolff et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Renbaum-Wolff, L., Grayson, J. W., Bateman, A. P., Kuwata, M., Sellier, M.,
Murray, B. J., Shilling, J. E., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.: Viscosity
of α-pinene secondary organic material and implications for particle growth
and reactivity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 8014–8019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219548110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219548110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Riemer et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., and Curtis, J. H.: Aerosol
Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57,
187–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Riipinen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Riipinen, I., Pierce, J. R., Yli-Juuti, T., Nieminen, T., Häkkinen, S., Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Petäjä, T., Slowik, J., Chang, R., Shantz, N. C., Abbatt, J., Leaitch, W. R., Kerminen, V.-M., Worsnop, D. R., Pandis, S. N., Donahue, N. M., and Kulmala, M.: Organic condensation: a vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3865–3878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3865-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Robinson et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, E. S., Saleh, R., and Donahue, N. M.: Organic Aerosol Mixing Observed
by Single-Particle Mass Spectrometry, J. Phys. Chem. A,
117, 13935–13945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp405789t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp405789t</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Saleh et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Saleh, R., Donahue, N., and Robinson, A.: Time Scales for Gas-Particle
Partitioning Equilibration of Secondary Organic Aerosol Formed from
Alpha-Pinene Ozonolysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5588–5594,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400078d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400078d</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Schmedding et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Schmedding, R., Rasool, Q. Z., Zhang, Y., Pye, H. O. T., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Surratt, J. D., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Thornton, J. A., Goldstein, A. H., and Vizuete, W.: Predicting secondary organic aerosol phase state and viscosity and its effect on multiphase chemistry in a regional-scale air quality model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8201–8225, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8201-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8201-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Shiraiwa and Seinfeld(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Equilibration timescale of atmospheric
secondary organic aerosol partitioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24801,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054008</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Gas uptake and chemical
aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles, P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 11003–11008, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Pfrang, C., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Kinetic multi-layer model of gas-particle interactions in aerosols and clouds (KM-GAP): linking condensation, evaporation and chemical reactions of organics, oxidants and water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2777–2794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2777-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2777-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2013a)</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Yee, L. D., Schilling, K. A., Loza, C. L., Craven, J. S., Zuend,
A., Ziemann, P. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Size distribution dynamics reveal
particle-phase chemistry in organic aerosol formation, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 11746–11750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307501110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307501110</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2013b)</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Zuend, A., Bertram, A. K., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas–particle
partitioning of atmospheric aerosols: interplay of physical state,
non-ideal mixing and morphology, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15,
11441–11453, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51595H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51595H</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Berkemeier, T., Schilling-Fahnestock, K. A., Seinfeld, J. H., and Pöschl, U.: Molecular corridors and kinetic regimes in the multiphase chemical evolution of secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8323–8341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8323-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8323-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Shiraiwa et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Li, Y., Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., Berkemeier, T., Pandis,
S. N., Lelieveld, J., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Global distribution of
particle phase state in atmospheric secondary organic aerosols, Nat.
Commun., 8, 15002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15002</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Shrivastava et al.(2017a)</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Cappa, C. D., Fan, J., Goldstein, A. H., Guenther, A. B.,
Jimenez, J. L., Kuang, C., Laskin, A., Martin, S. T., Ng, N. L., Petaja, T.,
Pierce, J. R., Rasch, P. J., Roldin, P., Seinfeld, J. H., Shilling, J.,
Smith, J. N., Thornton, J. A., Volkamer, R., Wang, J., Worsnop, D. R.,
Zaveri, R. A., Zelenyuk, A., and Zhang, Q.: Recent advances in understanding
secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing, Rev. Geophys., 55, 509–559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540</a>,
2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Shrivastava et al.(2017b)</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Lou, S., Zelenyuk, A., Easter, R. C., Corley, R. A., Thrall,
B. D., Rasch, P. J., Fast, J. D., Simonich, S. L. M., Shen, H., and Tao, S.:
Global long-range transport and lung cancer risk from polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons shielded by coatings of organic aerosol, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 1246–1251, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618475114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618475114</a>,
2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Shrivastava et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Shrivastava, M., Rasool, Q. Z., Zhao, B., Octaviani, M., Zaveri,
R. A., Zelenyuk, A., Gaudet, B., Liu, Y., Shilling, J. E.,
Schneider, J., Schulz, C., Zöger, M., Martin, S. T., Ye, J.,
Guenther, A., Souza, R. F., Wendisch, M., and Pöschl, U.: Tight
Coupling of Surface and In-Plant Biochemistry and Convection Governs Key Fine
Particulate Components over the Amazon Rainforest, ACS Earth  Space
Chem., 6, 380–390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00356</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Song et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Song, M., Marcolli, C., Krieger, U. K., Zuend, A., and Peter, T.: Liquid-liquid
phase separation in aerosol particles: Dependence on O&thinsp;:&thinsp;C, organic
functionalities, and compositional complexity, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, L19801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052807" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052807</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Song et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Song, M., Liu, P., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.: Liquid–liquid phase separation in particles containing secondary organic material free of inorganic salts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11261–11271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11261-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11261-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Tikkanen et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Tikkanen, O.-P., Buchholz, A., Ylisirniö, A., Schobesberger, S., Virtanen, A., and Yli-Juuti, T.: Comparing secondary organic aerosol (SOA) volatility distributions derived from isothermal SOA particle evaporation data and FIGAERO–CIMS measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10441–10458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10441-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10441-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Vaden et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Vaden, T. D., Imre, D., Beránek, J., Shrivastava, M., and Zelenyuk, A.:
Evaporation kinetics and phase of laboratory and ambient secondary organic
aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 2190–2195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013391108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013391108</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Virtanen et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Virtanen, A., Joutsensaari, J., Koop, T., Kannosto, J., Yli-Pirilä, P.,
Leskinen, J., Mäkelä, J. M., Holopainen, J. K., Pöschl, U., Kulmala, M.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Laaksonen, A.: An amorphous solid state of biogenic
secondary organic aerosol particles, Nature, 467, 824–827,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09455" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09455</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>von Domaros et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
von Domaros, M., Lakey, P. S. J., Shiraiwa, M., and Tobias, D. J.: Multiscale
Modeling of Human Skin Oil-Induced Indoor Air Chemistry:
Combining Kinetic Models and Molecular Dynamics,  J.
Phys. Chem. B, 124, 3836–3843, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c02818" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c02818</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Ye et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, Q., Robinson, E. S., Ding, X., Ye, P., Sullivan, R. C., and Donahue, N. M.:
Mixing of secondary organic aerosols versus relative humidity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 12649–12654,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604536113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604536113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Ye et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, Q., Upshur, M. A., Robinson, E. S., Geiger, F. M., Sullivan, R. C.,
Thomson, R. J., and Donahue, N. M.: Following Particle-Particle Mixing in
Atmospheric Secondary Organic Aerosols by Using Isotopically Labeled
Terpenes, Chem, 4, 318–333,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.008</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Ylisirniö et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Ylisirniö, A., Buchholz, A., Mohr, C., Li, Z., Barreira, L., Lambe, A., Faiola, C., Kari, E., Yli-Juuti, T., Nizkorodov, S. A., Worsnop, D. R., Virtanen, A., and Schobesberger, S.: Composition and volatility of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formed from oxidation of real tree emissions compared to simplified volatile organic compound (VOC) systems , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5629–5644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5629-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5629-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>You et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
You, Y., Smith, M. L., Song, M., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.:
Liquid–liquid phase separation in atmospherically relevant particles
consisting of organic species and inorganic salts, Int. Rev.
Phys. Chem., 33, 43–77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0144235X.2014.890786" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/0144235X.2014.890786</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Zaveri et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Zaveri, R. A., Shilling, J. E., Zelenyuk, A., Zawadowicz, M. A., Suski, K.,
China, S., Bell, D. M., Veghte, D., and Laskin, A.: Particle-Phase Diffusion
Modulates Partitioning of Semivolatile Organic Compounds to Aged Secondary
Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 2595–2605,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05514" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05514</a>,  2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Zaveri et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Zaveri, R. A., Wang, J., Fan, J., Zhang, Y., Shilling, J. E., Zelenyuk, A.,
Mei, F., Newsom, R., Pekour, M., Tomlinson, J., Comstock, J. M., Shrivastava,
M., Fortner, E., Machado, L. A. T., Artaxo, P., and Martin, S. T.: Rapid
growth of anthropogenic organic nanoparticles greatly alters cloud life cycle
in the Amazon rainforest, Sci. Adv., 8, eabj0329,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj0329" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj0329</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Zhang et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Lambe, A. T., Olson, N. E., Lei, Z., Craig, R. L., Zhang,
Z., Gold, A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Gaston, C. J.,
Thornton, J. A., Vizuete, W., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Effect of the
Aerosol-Phase State on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from the Reactive
Uptake of Isoprene-Derived Epoxydiols (IEPOX), Environ. Sci.
Tech. Let., 5, 167–174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00044</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Zhou et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Shiraiwa, M., McWhinney, R. D., Pöschl, U., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Kinetic limitations in gas-particle reactions arising from slow diffusion in
secondary organic aerosol, Faraday Discuss., 165, 391–406,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00030C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C3FD00030C</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Zobrist et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Zobrist, B., Marcolli, C., Pedernera, D. A., and Koop, T.: Do atmospheric aerosols form glasses?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5221–5244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5221-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5221-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Zuend and Seinfeld(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Zuend, A. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Modeling the gas-particle partitioning of secondary organic aerosol: the importance of liquid-liquid phase separation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3857–3882, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3857-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3857-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Zuend et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Luo, B. P., and Peter, T.: A thermodynamic model of mixed organic-inorganic aerosols to predict activity coefficients, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4559–4593, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4559-2008</a>, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Zuend et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Zuend, A., Marcolli, C., Booth, A. M., Lienhard, D. M., Soonsin, V., Krieger, U. K., Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G., Peter, T., and Seinfeld, J. H.: New and extended parameterization of the thermodynamic model AIOMFAC: calculation of activity coefficients for organic-inorganic mixtures containing carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl, ether, ester, alkenyl, alkyl, and aromatic functional groups, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9155–9206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9155-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
