<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-9199-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Light absorption by brown carbon over the <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>South-East Atlantic Ocean</article-title><alt-title>Light absorption by brown carbon</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Light absorption by brown carbon}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L. Zhang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name>
          <email>luzhang@mail.tau.ac.il</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-0693</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Segal-Rozenhaimer</surname><given-names>Michal</given-names></name>
          <email>msegalro@tauex.tau.ac.il</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Che</surname><given-names>Haochi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8323-8633</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>Caroline</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-9286</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Sedlacek III</surname><given-names>Arthur J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9595-3653</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>Ernie R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2023-7406</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Dobracki</surname><given-names>Amie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>Jenny P. S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Formenti</surname><given-names>Paola</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-1351</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Howell</surname><given-names>Steven G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10 aff11">
          <name><surname>Nenes</surname><given-names>Athanasios</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3873-9970</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Geophysics, Porter School of the Environment and Earth
Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Bay Area Environmental Research Institute,
Moffett Field, California, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of
Miami, Miami, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mount Allison University, Sackville, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Université Paris Cité and Univ Paris Est Creteil, CNRS, LISA,
75013 Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Department of Oceanography, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu,
USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Laboratory of Atmospheric Processes and their Impacts, School of
Architecture, Civil &amp; Environmental Engineering, Ecole
Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Center for Studies of Air Quality and Climate Change, Institute of
Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology
Hellas, Heraklion, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Lu Zhang (luzhang@mail.tau.ac.il), Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer
(msegalro@tauex.tau.ac.il)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>July</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>9199</fpage><lpage>9213</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e250">Biomass burning emissions often contain brown carbon (BrC), which
represents a large family of light-absorbing organics that are chemically
complex, thus making it difficult to estimate their absorption of incoming
solar radiation, resulting in large uncertainties in the estimation of the
global direct radiative effect of aerosols. Here we investigate the
contribution of BrC to the total light absorption of biomass burning
aerosols over the South-East Atlantic Ocean with different optical models,
utilizing a suite of airborne measurements from the ORACLES 2018 campaign.
An effective refractive index of black carbon (BC),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that characterizes the absorptivity of all
absorbing components at 660 nm wavelength was introduced to facilitate the
attribution of absorption at shorter wavelengths, i.e. 470 nm. Most values
of the imaginary part of the effective refractive index, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were
larger than those commonly used for BC from biomass burning emissions,
suggesting contributions from absorbers besides BC at 660 nm. The TEM-EDX
single-particle analysis further suggests that these long-wavelength
absorbers might include iron oxides, as iron is found to be present only
when large values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are derived. Using this effective BC
refractive index, we find that the contribution of BrC to the total
absorption at 470 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–22 %,
with the organic aerosol mass absorption coefficient (MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) at
this wavelength ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The core–shell model yielded much higher estimates
of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than homogeneous mixing models,
underscoring the importance of model treatment. Absorption attribution using
the Bruggeman mixing Mie model suggests a minor BrC contribution of 4 %
at 530 nm, while its removal would triple the BrC contribution to the total
absorption at 470 nm obtained using the AAE (absorption Ångström
exponent) attribution method. Thus, it is recommended that the application
of any optical properties-based attribution method use absorption
coefficients at the longest possible wavelength to minimize the influence of
BrC and to account for potential contributions from other absorbing
materials.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e425">Black carbon (BC) and brown carbon (BrC) are the two main light-absorbing
carbonaceous aerosols that play a significant role in Earth's radiative
forcing and climate
(Bond
et al., 2013; Laskin et al., 2015; Brown et al., 2018). BC is the principal
atmospheric particulate absorber and absorbs strongly over the entire solar
spectrum (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006). Biomass burning (BB)
contributes approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the global primary organic aerosol (OA)
budget, which is currently treated in most climate models as “white
carbon” that only scatters and does not absorb light
(Bond
et al., 2013). However, studies show that BB OA contains a substantial
amount of BrC, which predominantly absorbs at short visible and near-UV
wavelengths
(Chen
and Bond, 2010; Lack et al., 2012; Saleh et al., 2014; Taylor et al., 2020).
Feng et al. (2013) found that the absorption of BrC can shift BB direct
radiative forcing to positive values. The contribution of BrC to the total
absorption by carbonaceous aerosols is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–50 %, with a global radiative effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>3–0.6 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Kirchstetter
and Thatcher, 2012; Wang et al., 2013; Feng et al., 2013; Saleh et al.,
2015; Jo et al., 2016). However, values reported by these studies are
subject to substantial uncertainties, and investigations of BrC properties
are still very much in a developmental stage (Szopa
et al., 2021). Thus, to realize a substantive reduction in the uncertainty,
a better attribution of BrC light absorption is required.</p>
      <p id="d1e472">Several methods have been employed to investigate the light absorption of
BrC. The AAE (absorption Ångström exponent) attribution method
utilizes the different spectral dependences of the absorption by BC and BrC
to determine the contribution from BrC at short wavelengths
(Lack
and Langridge, 2013; J. Wang et al., 2018; Taylor et al., 2020). Most earlier
studies assumed the AAE of BC (AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to be unity, although this
assumption may introduce large uncertainties (Lack and Langridge, 2013)
because AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varies with size, mixing state, and wavelength
(Lack and Cappa, 2010;
Fig. 2 in Liu et al., 2015, 2018). Revised
methods with more realistic values of AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have been proposed, such as
using the AAE from two long-visible wavelengths
(Taylor et al.,
2020) or that from the Mie model
(J. Wang et al.,
2018). A major drawback of these methods is that they are suitable only for
mixtures of BC and BrC, and if other absorbing materials are present, such
as dusts, more information is needed to account for their contribution to
light absorption at longer wavelengths. Another methodology involves
measuring the absorption of organics that have been extracted with either an
organic solvent or water and represents, thus far the only way to directly
measure BrC absorption (Wong et
al., 2019). The drawback to this approach is that not all organics can be
extracted with one or two solvents, as highlighted by the work of
Chen and Bond (2010), who reported
extraction efficiencies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in water and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in methanol. This inability to extract all organics
means that insoluble organic substances remain unknown since they are not
measured. This, in turn, could lead to cases where the absorption properties
of the extracted organics might be different from those derived from in situ
measurements. In addition, this method is carried out offline and requires
elaborate laboratory analysis. Still another approach to estimate the
absorption of BrC is through optical closure, which determines the BrC absorption
as the difference of the total measured absorption and that of BC calculated
using Mie theory (Saleh et al.,
2014; Liu et al., 2015). In this approach, the accuracy of BrC absorption
relies heavily on the accuracy of BC absorption calculation. Values commonly
used for the refractive index of BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from BB emissions in these
calculations have ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Liu
et al., 2015; Chylek et al., 2019; Taylor et al., 2020; Kahnert and
Kanngießer, 2020), which will lead to large differences in BC absorption
simulation results (Taylor et al., 2020). To date there is no consensus on
the best value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Another factor influencing the BC absorption
calculation, and hence the estimated BrC absorption, is the mixing state of
BC and non-BC components within particles. Liu et al. (2015) used the
core–shell (CS) Mie model and Rayleigh–Debye–Gans approximation to
investigate the effect of BC microphysics on the estimation of BrC
absorption and found it to be highly sensitive to the model treatment. Saleh
et al. (2014) compared internal and external mixtures of BC and BrC and
found internally mixed cases yielded smaller BrC absorption than externally
mixed ones. Similar to the AAE attribution method, the presence of absorbing
materials other than BC and BrC can lead to errors in the attribution of BrC
absorption. For example, light-absorbing iron oxides (FeOx) were found to be
common in field studies, especially for BB emissions
(Ito et al., 2018), yet few studies perform
measurements of size distributions and chemical composition of this particle
type, making it difficult to separate their contribution to the total
absorption from that of BrC.</p>
      <p id="d1e579">The savannah regions in Africa experience widespread annual BB events from
July to October, which are estimated to account for approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
global BB emissions
(van
der Werf et al., 2010). These aerosols are transported westward over the
South-East Atlantic, making the region of the west coast of southern Africa
and the South-East Atlantic that with the largest BrC absorption
aerosol optical depth
(Brown et al., 2018)
and hence an ideal natural laboratory for investigating the absorption of
BrC from BB emissions. In this study, we estimate the absorption of BrC
using the optical closure method, utilizing in situ aircraft measurements and
offline single-particle analysis from the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols
above CLouds and their intEractionS) 2018 campaign
(Redemann
et al., 2021). An effective refractive index of BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which
attempts to capture the absorption of all possible absorbing components at
660 nm, is introduced to facilitate the absorption attribution at shorter
wavelengths. The core–shell model and homogeneous models are applied and
compared in this study. The range of values of the OA mass absorption
coefficient (MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and contribution of BrC to the total absorption
at 470 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using the optical closure method are also obtained.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e638">Upper left panel: overview of the flight locations during ORACLES
2018 investigated in this study. All other panels: 7 d back-trajectories and fire radiative power from MODIS 6 Collection Active Fire
Detections (MCD14ML) at the end day of the trajectory (only data with
confidence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used here).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9199/2022/acp-22-9199-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site and instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d1e675">ORACLES was a 3-year NASA-funded airborne field campaign to investigate
the influence of BB emissions from southern Africa on regional and global
climate (Redemann et al., 2021). We investigated aerosol optical properties
from straight and level runs during seven research flights (RFs) from the
ORACLES 2018 campaign (Fig. 1): RF05_1, RF05_2, RF05_3, RF06_1, RF06_2,
RF10, and RF11. The specifications for each flight can be found in Table 1
in Dang et al. (2021). These flights were
chosen as they provided investigations of aerosol properties in the marine
boundary layer (MBL) and free troposphere (FT), from relatively aged
aerosols to highly aged aerosols, and are comprehensive in online and
offline measurements with few missing data. RF05_1 and
RF05_2 were within the MBL at an altitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">940</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 380 m, respectively; other flights were in the aerosol layer in the
FT at an altitude equal to or greater than 2 km. The aerosol/plume age,
modelled with a 2-week forecast using the Weather Research and Aerosol
Aware Microphysics (WRF-AAM) model (Thompson and
Eidhammer, 2014), was estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d for
RF05_1 and RF05_2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d
for RF05_3, RF06_1, RF06_2,
RF10, and RF11 (Fig. S1 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e708">The mass and number concentrations of the refractory BC particles and the
single-particle mass and mixing state were determined by the Single-Particle
Soot Photometer (SP2; Droplet Measurement Technologies). Coating thicknesses
of refractory-black-carbon-containing particles were derived from scattering measurements using
the leading-edge-only (LEO) method of
Gao et al. (2007).
The SP2 detects BC particles with core diameters from 80–650 nm; a log-normal
function was fit to BC number size distribution to account for BC particles
with core diameters outside this range
(Schwarz
et al., 2006). The mass equivalent diameter of BC was calculated as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the
mass and density of BC, respectively, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assumed to be
1.8 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006). The uncertainty of the
measured BC mass concentration and coating thicknesses is estimated to be
20 % and 22 %, respectively (Laborde et al., 2012). The mass ratio
(MR) of non-BC substance to BC for BC-containing particles was determined by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC-free</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the diameter of coated BC particle and
BC core, respectively; the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th particle in the investigated
time window. The determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC-free</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be discussed in
Sect. 2.2.</p>
      <p id="d1e911">A particle soot absorption photometer (PSAP; Radiance Research) was used to
determine 1 Hz aerosol absorption coefficients at wavelengths 470, 530, and
660 nm, which were corrected with the wavelength-averaged Virkkula
correction (Virkkula, 2010)
and smoothed to 10 s to reduce noise. The uncertainty of absorption
coefficients is estimated to be 20 %
(Fischer
et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e914">A high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS,
Aerodyne Research) measured mass concentrations of sulfate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ammonium
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), chloride (Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and OA from particles with
vacuum aerodynamic diameters between 50 and 500 nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e969">We determine single-particle mixing state and elemental composition from
offline analysis of particles sampled on Paella TEM grids. Around 50
particles per filter were analysed. A JEOL™ JEM-2010F FEG-TEM
with a ThermoNoran™ EDX detector was used. TEM was performed at
200 KeV accelerating voltage, with a take-off angle of 15.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
X-ray emission from the sample. The elemental weight percentage per particle
was determined using the NSS software (Thermo Electron Corporation) with
the Cliff–Lorimer absorbance correction method. Detailed descriptions can be
found in Dang et al. (2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e981">All in situ instruments were mounted in the NASA P-3 aircraft and operated
under dry conditions. Data for BC mass concentration less than 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or absorption coefficients at 660 nm less than 1.5 Mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were
not included. Measurements were averaged to 10 s and adjusted to STP values
at 273.15 K and 1013 hPa.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Optical models</title>
      <p id="d1e1024">Most of the particles were found to be nearly spherical from the images
obtained by TEM, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the particles having aspect
ratios (the largest and smallest characteristic sizes of arbitrarily shaped
particle) smaller than 1.5. Therefore, we applied Mie theory to determine
aerosol optical properties. Models such as T-matrix or the discrete dipole
approximation model were not used as they would require a large number of
free parameters
(Scarnato
et al., 2013; He et al., 2016). We investigated the sensitivity of our
closure simulations to four different models for the BC-containing particles
– the ideal core–shell (CS) model and three homogeneous mixing models: (1) the volume mixing (VM) model, (2) the Maxwell–Garnett (MG) model, and (3) the
Bruggeman (BG) model. The number size distribution of BC-containing
particles was obtained from the BC core size distribution and the BC 2-D
size and mixing state (i.e. coating thickness) distribution from SP2. The open-source PyMieScatt code was used in this study (Sumlin et al., 2018).
Detailed descriptions and inputs of the four models can be found in Sect. S1 in the Supplement. We assumed that the non-BC components were
homogeneously mixed and calculated the refractive index of the mixture,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC-free</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the VM rule. The mass concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by AMS were
converted to those of inorganic salts to facilitate calculation, using the
simplified ion-pairing scheme proposed by
Gysel et al. (2007),
modified as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M59" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">KNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the number of moles. As potassium salts are the most
frequently detected salts from TEM-EDX analysis (Dang et al., 2021), the
residual anions were assumed to be combined with potassium, i.e. KNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, a small fraction of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detected by the AMS might be
organics and thus lack an accompanying cation. Densities of the various
salts and OA used to convert the mass concentrations to volume
concentrations were taken from
Kuang
et al. (2020; Table 1) and Liu et al. (2015). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC-free</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated
as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC-free</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">salts</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">salts</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the refractive indices and volumes of
aforementioned salts; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are those for OA. The refractive
indices of salts are taken from
Fierz-Schmidhauser
et al. (2010) and Cotterell et al. (2017). The real part of the refractive
index of OA varies from 1.35 to 1.7 (Lack and Cappa, 2010; Liu et al., 2013;
Saleh et al., 2014; Moise et al., 2015); 1.55 is used in this study. OA is
assumed to be non-absorbing in the calculation. The average and standard
deviation of calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC-free</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.015</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with
the values used in BrC studies in literature
(Saleh
et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2021, 2015). The particle effective refractive
indices for the VM, MG, and BG models can then be obtained using the
corresponding mixing rules (Sect. S1) with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BC-free</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The determination of the refractive index of BC
will be discussed in the following section.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1972">Schematic diagram of the iterative derivation of BrC absorption
attribution performed in this study. Cells in white, yellow, and blue
represent instrument, measurements, and calculations, respectively. The
green box is the optimization step used to determine the values of the
imaginary part of the effective refractive index of BC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, once the
deviation of measured and calculated absorption coefficients at 660 nm
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
minimized. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is held constant at investigated wavelengths, i.e. 470,
530, and 660 nm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9199/2022/acp-22-9199-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Optical calculation procedure</title>
      <p id="d1e2049">The numerical value selected for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a large impact on the
absorption attributed to BC (Fig. 3) and hence on the estimated absorption
by BrC, but as noted above, there is no consensus on the best value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, the lack of measurements of possible absorbers other
than BC and BrC such as magnetite makes it difficult to correctly estimate
the BrC absorption, so approaches that take these components into
consideration are required. Here, we introduce an effective refractive index
of BC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to represent the refractive index of BC
and any other absorbing components at 660 nm in this study. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
would be the same as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if the absorption at 660 nm is solely
contributed by BC; however, if other absorbing components are present, the
imaginary part (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be greater than that
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the amount of which depends on the absorptivity and
relative amount of these absorbers. The real part of<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is held
constant at 1.95, the upper bound of the values commonly used for BC (Bond
and Bergstrom, 2006; Saleh et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2015; Kahnert and
Kanngießer, 2020). It only has a minor influence on absorption
calculations (Liu et al., 2021): a sensitivity test of the calculated
absorption to the real part of<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when the latter is varied from 1.75
to 2.26 shows that, at the extreme case of RF10 with the thickest coating in
this study, the absorption increased less than 5 % at 660 nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e2190">The retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is illustrated in Fig. 2. OA is assumed to be
non-absorbing; thus, the imaginary refractive index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken as zero
in this calculation. Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were determined by minimizing the
squares, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of the relative differences between the measured and
calculated absorption coefficients at 660 nm for each model:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are the calculated and measured absorption coefficients at 660 nm,
respectively. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is searched from 0.3 to 2.6, over a
greater range than the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recorded in literature (Chylek et
al., 2019; Kahnert and Kanngießer, 2020) and with a span of 0.01. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 0.1 are excluded.</p>
      <p id="d1e2386">The absorption of BrC at the long visible, i.e. 660 nm, is expected to be
very small or negligible considering the aged nature of aerosols in our
study
(Sedlacek
III et al., 2018; Adler et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019). Therefore, we assume
that the contribution of BrC to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be neglected and use it to
differentiate the BrC absorption from that of other substances, i.e. BC and
any other absorbers. This assumption of nil contribution of BrC to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields a lower bound of BrC absorption at 530 and 470 nm. An
evaluation of the influence of this assumption to the BrC absorption at
shorter wavelengths is discussed in Sect. S2. As
illustrated in Fig. 2, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was held constant over the range of
investigated wavelengths, i.e. 470–660 nm. This is supported by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is usually considered to be very weakly dependent on, or independent of,
wavelength in the visible spectrum (e.g. Chang and Charalampopoulos, 1990;
Moteki et al., 2010; Saleh et al., 2014). As discussed later in Sect. 3.1,
other absorbers contributing to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, if any, are hypothesized to be
magnetite, whose refractive index is also mostly invariant between
wavelengths 470 and 660 nm (Amaury et al., unpublished data,
<uri>http://www.astro.uni-jena.de/Laboratory/OCDB/mgfeoxides.html</uri>, last access: 8 July 2022;
Ackerman
and Toon, 1981; X. L. Zhang et al., 2015). Thus, the assumption of constant
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 470 and 660 nm is reasonable in our study, although it may
lead to overestimations of BrC absorption for highly aged particles, as
discussed further in Sect. 3.2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2462">Modelled (blue and orange markers) and measured (green markers)
absorption coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at PSAP wavelengths for
RF06_1. Variables are modelled with two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (shown
in the legend) using the CS, MG, BG, and VM models (specified on the top of
each plot). OA is assumed to be non-absorbing with the refractive index
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The horizontal lines in the boxes represent the median
value, the boxes represent the 25th to 75th percentile, the whiskers
represent 1.5 times the interquartile range, and the diamonds represent outliers.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9199/2022/acp-22-9199-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2518">The absorption of BrC at wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is calculated as the difference between measured absorption coefficient
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and that calculated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M117" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2646">The fractional contribution of BrC to the total absorption at wavelength
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is defined as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M120" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          and is assumed to be zero at 660 nm in our study. The mass absorption cross
section (MAC) of OA at wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be
determined from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the mass concentration of
OA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M125" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Similarly, the mass absorption coefficient of BC (MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is defined as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the measured absorption coefficient at wavelength
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the mass concentration of BC, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2899">Box plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (left axis) derived from different models and
the MR values (orange open dots, right axis) for each flight. Error bars of
MR represent 20 % uncertainty. The right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis uses the log scale. The light
and dark grey shaded region shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller than 1.26, the largest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value determined by Moteki et al. (2010), and 0.79, the largest
value of commonly used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9199/2022/acp-22-9199-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Effective refractive index of BC ($m_{\mathrm{eBC}}$)}?><title>Effective refractive index of BC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e2987">In this section, we present and discuss the results of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from
the aforementioned four models for each flight. Uncertainties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieved from various models have been determined by Monte Carlo
uncertainty analysis in Sect. S3. The values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each flight determined by the various models are shown in
Fig. 4. No <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for RF05_3 was obtained with the CS
model because the criterion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller than 0.1 was not met,
as the absorption coefficient calculated with the CS model using the largest
possible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was only half of the measurement for
RF05_3 (Fig. S2). Variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show similar
patterns among different models (Fig. 4). The values derived from the CS and
VM models are the highest and lowest, respectively, and the values derived
from the MG and BG models are between the other two models and very close to
each other, in agreement with the absorption results calculated with various
models in previous studies
(Lesins
et al., 2002; Fierce et al., 2017a; Taylor et al., 2020). The values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for RF05_1, RF05_2, RF06_1, and
RF06_2 from the CS model have greatly exceeded the largest
value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.26 (grey shaded region in Fig. 4), determined by
Moteki et al. (2010) for soot particles
from an urban source (Tokyo). Little confidence has been placed in the value
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the CS model, except for RF10 for two main reasons. First,
the MR for all samples is less than 2, and application of the CS model can
be inappropriate for particles with such low MR values (Liu et al., 2017).
Furthermore, the TEM analysis found few core–shell structures (e.g. example
of RF05_1 in Fig. 5) among investigated samples, with most
BC-containing particles composed of condensed BC nodules internally mixed
with salts/organics (e.g. example of RF05_3 in Fig. 5) or
aggregates attached to non-BC components (e.g. example of
RF05_2 in Fig. 5). Representative TEM images of different
types of BC-containing particles for each flight are shown in Fig. 5. The
use of the CS model for RF10 was supported by its high MR value of 7.4, which
has exceeded the lower bound of MR for the use of CS model proposed by Liu
et al. (2017), although a fair number of BC particles homogeneously mixed
with salts and OA were detected as well (Fig. 5). In addition, results of
the BrC contribution to the total absorption suggest that homogeneous models
might be inappropriate for RF10, as discussed in detail in Sect. 3.3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3117">Elemental composition and representative microphysical images of
different types of BC-containing particles from TEM analysis for each
flight. Int BC and Ext BC represent internally and externally mixed BC
particles, respectively. For example, Int BC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>K stands for internally mixed
BC with potassium salts. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis uses a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scale.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9199/2022/acp-22-9199-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3156">As discussed in Sect. 2.3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should be the same as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if the
absorption at 660 nm arises only from BC; higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value indicates
larger absorptivity of absorbers at 660 nm. The values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
RF05_1, RF05_2, RF05_3,
RF06_1, and RF06_2, for which iron (Fe) was
detected from the TEM-EDX (as shown in the bar chart in Fig. 5), are mostly
larger than unity and greater than those for RF10 and RF11, for which no
iron was detected. Therefore, we suspect higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values may be
related to iron oxides (FeOx) that absorb at 660 nm. We have examined all
possible compounds of detected elements from EDX and found that magnetite is
the only compound that is not rare in the atmosphere and also absorbs
strongly at 660 nm. Magnetite shows a strong and uniform absorptivity over
the visible spectrum, with the reported imaginary refractive index ranging from
0.58 to 1.0 (Amaury et al., unpublished data,
<uri>http://www.astro.uni-jena.de/Laboratory/OCDB/mgfeoxides.html</uri>,
last access: 8 July 2022; Ackerman and
Toon, 1981; X. L. Zhang et al., 2015), and therefore can contribute to the high
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 660 nm. Studies show that magnetite can be transformed
from Fe(III) at high temperatures, such as goethite and hematite (Till et
al., 2015; Ito et al., 2018), which happen to be the two most abundant forms
of FeOx in African dust (Formenti et al., 2014). Therefore, we hypothesize
that a part of the magnetite might be converted from Fe(III) during biomass
burning. Additionally, magnetite can be emitted from anthropogenic
activities, such as steel manufacturing, oil combustion, and engines and
brakes of motor vehicles
(Machemer,
2004; Liati et al., 2015; Moteki et al., 2017; Kurisu et al., 2019). The
significance of anthropogenic magnetite in radiative forcing has been
investigated and highlighted in recent studies (Moteki et al., 2017; Ito et
al., 2018; Lamb et al., 2021). Although there is no investigation on
magnetite in sub-Saharan Africa yet, the industrial and motor vehicle
emissions in Africa are likely to contribute magnetite. Furthermore, the
pyrometallurgical process is a widely used extraction method in copper
mining, a major industry in the central African Copperbelt
(<uri>https://www.pyrometallurgy.co.za/PyroSA/</uri>, last access: 8 July 2022,
Vítková et al., 2010; Sikamo et al., 2016; Shengo et al., 2019), of
which iron is a common unwanted slag element
(Meter et al., 1999).
Therefore, we suspect it might also contribute magnetite, considering the
high temperature of the pyrometallurgical process.</p>
      <p id="d1e3233">RF05_3, collected at the uppermost aerosol layer (Fig. 4), is
an exception among all flights, since the values of the absorption
coefficient at 660 nm calculated with all four models are considerably
smaller than the measured ones (Fig. S2). The MG, BG, and VM models yield
median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values greater than 1.6; no values met the criterion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the CS model. The MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of
RF05_3 is the highest among all flights, with values
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 470, 530, and 660 nm, respectively.
The absorption enhancement, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined as the ratio of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
the value for uncoated BC reported by Bond and Bergstrom (2006), is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all three wavelengths. To the best of our knowledge,
except for modelling or laboratory studies of thickly coated particles
(Bond
et al., 2006; Jacobson, 2012; Peng et al., 2016; Che et al., 2022a), such high values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly at long visible wavelengths, are rarely reported in
field measurements (Cui et al., 2016).
Taylor et al. (2020) presented relatively high MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 405, 514,
and 655 nm, respectively and an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for CLARIFY
2017 (Cloud-Aerosol-Radiation Interaction and Forcing 2017 measurement
campaign; Haywood et al., 2021),
which are generally comparable to or smaller than those for RF05_3. However, particles in CLARIFY 2017 are universally thickly coated, with
median MR values of 8–12, and therefore would be expected to have large
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as opposed to RF05_3, which had a median
MR (Fig. 4) of 1.6. We calculated absorption coefficients for
RF05_3 at 660 nm using the VM model, which usually yields a
higher estimation of the measurements (Taylor et al., 2020) and a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an upper bound of the commonly used BC refractive
index (Liu et al., 2021). Uncertainties related to calculated absorption
coefficients can be found in Sect. S3. The calculated
absorption, which is very likely an overestimation of the measurement, is
only able to explain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the measured absorption
coefficient (Fig. S2), implying that the remaining amount of absorption
which cannot be attributed to BC might result from other absorbers. This
unexplained portion of absorption in RF05_3 is at least twice
as high as that in other flights (e.g. Figs. 3 and S2).
Back-trajectories show that air parcels in RF05_3 passed by
the Copperbelt in Zambia (Fig. 1), where the pyrometallurgical process in
copper mining might contribute large amounts of magnetite. In addition, we
noticed titanium (Ti) on the particles from RF05_3. Although
titanium oxides are not absorbing, several forms of Ti have been reported to
strongly absorb at visible wavelengths
(Pflüger and Fink, 1997; Palm et al.,
2018). Therefore, we suspect this unexplained absorption in
RF05_3 may also be related to absorbing titanium compounds.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3522">Values of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (boxes) derived using different
models and the mass concentration of OA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (orange dots, left <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis),
for each flight. Error bars represent 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation. The
scale of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes is symmetric log. The horizontal lines of box plot
represent the median value, the boxes represent the 25th to 75th
percentile, and the whiskers represent 1.5 times the interquartile range.
RF05_1 and RF05_2 were measured in the MBL
with plume aged larger than 11 d; other flights were measured in the FT
with ageing time around 7 d. The aerosol/plume age provided by a 2-week
forecast using the Weather Research and Aerosol Aware Microphysics (WRF-AAM)
model.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9199/2022/acp-22-9199-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Mass absorption coefficient of OA (MAC${}_{\mathrm{OA}}$)}?><title>Mass absorption coefficient of OA (MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e3595">Values of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated from Eq. (11) using the different models
are shown in Fig. 6. The uncertainty of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has been determined
using Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis in Sect. S3. The
values of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the three homogeneous models were fairly close
to each other, as expected from previous studies
(Lesins et al., 2002), while MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the CS
model was much greater, highlighting the importance of model treatment. From
Sect. 3.1, results of RF10 from the CS model and the results of other
flights calculated with homogeneous models are more plausible, with the
values (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation) of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
RF05_3, RF06_1, RF06_2, RF10,
and RF11 ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This result at 470 nm is generally comparable to
the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 405 nm for highly aged
aerosols sampled downwind of ORACLES in CLARIFY 2017 campaign
(Taylor et al.,
2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e3755">RF05_1 and RF05_2, whose particles are as
least as aged as those in CLARIFY, showed unexpectedly high MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Although the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for these
samples are low (Fig. 6), measurements from all instruments are within the
detection limit, which would argue that these values are valid.
X. Wang et al. (2018) used
airborne measurements to constrain their global model and found the best
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to represent the measurements was 1.33 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
freshly emitted BB OA at 365 nm. Lin
et al. (2017) investigated relatively fresh BB aerosols subject to
atmospheric processing during a night-long BB event in an urban environment
and reported a MAC of 0.9 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for water-extractable BrC at
470 nm under the peak BB episode. Our values of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
RF05_1 and RF05_2 are much higher than those
for much fresher BB aerosols, which seems unrealistic, as BrC bleaching is
expected to occur during transport (Hems et al.,
2021; Che et al., 2021). One possible explanation is that secondary BrC
formation occurred, perhaps through aqueous-phase chemistry during transport
(Hems et al., 2021), as RF05_1 and RF05_2 were
sampled in the MBL with higher RHs. Saleh et al. (2013) reported that
secondary BrC can be more absorbing than primary BrC at short visible
wavelengths; however, to the best of our knowledge, such high MAC like those
in RF05_1 and RF05_2 for secondary BrC have
not been documented (Kasthuriarachchi et
al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e3895">We assume a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the investigated spectrum, i.e. 470–660 nm, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be underestimated at shorter wavelengths if
there are some components with strong absorption at short visible but not at
long visible wavelengths and therefore lead to an overestimation of
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mn>.470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hematite, whose imaginary refractive index ranges from 0 to
1.0 at 470 nm and 0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 670 nm
(X. L. Zhang
et al., 2015; Go et al., 2022), is the second most abundant FeOx in western
African dust (Formenti et al., 2014).
Particles in RF05_1 and RF05_2 experienced
over 11 d of transport and thus may have more opportunities to mix with
hematite and therefore lead to an overestimation of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. While
lacking measurements to determine the compound, it is difficult to verify
our speculation. A modified SP2 has been reported by Yoshida
et al. (2016) that can discriminate black-coloured magnetite and
red-coloured hematite; thus, we recommend adding such measurement
capabilities in future BB investigations over Africa and the South-East
Atlantic region.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3954">Contribution of BrC to the total absorption obtained from optical
closure approach in this study (boxes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and from the AAE
attribution method (orange squares, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 470 nm. The grey
zone indicates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range of 8 %–22 % in this study. Orange
shades of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the 10th and 90th percentile.
The orange diamond is the contribution of WSOC (water-soluble organic
carbon) to the total absorption, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Athanasios Nenes, personal
communication, 2021).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9199/2022/acp-22-9199-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4056">Illustration of the attribution of absorption for
RF06_1. Blue area represents the absorption of BC, calculated
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using BG model. The upper border of the yellow
region represents absorption coefficients calculated with corresponding
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for RF06_1 using BG model assuming
non-absorbing OA; the yellow area illustrates the absorption by absorbing
components besides BC and BrC, calculated as the difference between the two
absorption coefficients calculated by the BG model using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The upper border of the red region is drawn with
measured absorption coefficients at 470, 530, and 660 nm. The red region
stands for the BrC absorption coefficient calculated from the AAE
attribution method with Eq. (13). The 2 % and 11 % are the proportions
of BrC at 470 nm estimated from the AAE attribution method and our optical
closure method, respectively. The table in the lower panel shows the
absorption attribution at 470, 530, and 660 nm from the optical closure
method. Uncertainties can be found in Table S2 in the Supplement.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9199/2022/acp-22-9199-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Contribution of BrC to total absorption ($R_{\mathrm{BrC}}$)}?><title>Contribution of BrC to total absorption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e4139">The contribution of BrC to the total absorption at 470 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which was calculated using the optical closure method from Eq. (10), is shown
in Fig. 7. The uncertainties using various models can be found in Sect. S3. Similar to the results for MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the MG, BG,
and VM models yield fairly close results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while those from
the CS model are higher, consistent with previous studies
(Lesins
et al., 2002; Taylor et al., 2020). It is noted that the values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from MG, BG, and VM models at 470 nm for RF10 are the lowest
among all flights, with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Little confidence
is placed on this value because particles with similar age in
RF05_3, RF06_1, RF06_2, and
RF11 all showed a much higher value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, Athanasios Nenes et al. (personal communication, 2021) reported the contribution of water-soluble
organic carbon (WSOC) to the total absorption at 365 nm of 20 % (Fig. 7)
for particles measured at a similar location in the plume 10 min later than
RF10, with no distinct changes in either the meteorological conditions or
aerosol properties. Therefore, we expect the AAE of BrC at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
wavelength pair, AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (absorption
coefficients of BrC at 365 and 470 nm) to be within the range of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–11 in literature (Laskin et al., 2015). Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is unknown, we calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">extrapolate</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by extrapolating the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 365 nm with the measured AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
approximated the AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the 20 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">extrapolate</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
homogeneous models. This method yields an underestimation of
AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, while its value can still reach 18, much higher than
the upper limit of the AAE range reported in literature (Laskin et al.,
2015), suggesting that the use of homogeneous models for RF10 may not be
appropriate. As discussed in Sect. 3.1, the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
RF10 from the CS model and RF05_1, RF05_2,
RF05_3, RF06_1, RF06_2, and
RF11 from homogeneous models are more plausible. Particles of
RF05_1 and RF05_2 may contain hematite, in
which case their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be overestimated (Sect. 3.2).
Generally, in our study, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–22 % at 470 nm (grey zone in Fig. 7), slightly lower than the contribution
of 13 %–26 % at 500 nm for relatively fresh OA in the wood smoke from
Kirchstetter and Thatcher (2012) and
generally comparable to or slightly higher than the result of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 405 nm for highly aged aerosols from CLARIFY 2017, which were
sampled downwind of ORACLES, implying the bleaching of BrC during transport
(Hems et al., 2021; Che et al., 2022b).</p>
      <p id="d1e4546">We calculated the contribution of BrC to the total absorption using the AAE
attribution method (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and compared it with that from our
optical closure method (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the AAE attribution method, the
absorption coefficient of BC at the investigated wavelength (470 nm in our
case) is determined by extrapolating the absorption coefficient at a longer
wavelength (530 nm in our case) with the AAE of BC. For example, in this
study, the average AAE at 530/660 wavelength pair (AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) for all
flights is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is just below unity and within the range
expected for BC
(Liu
et al., 2018; Taylor et al., 2020). Thus, we assume that the absorption
coefficients at 530 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have
no significant contribution from BrC and that the AAE for BC is independent
of wavelength. The contribution of BrC to the total absorption,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, can then be calculated as below.</p>
      <p id="d1e4664"><disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M259" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E13"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>13</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>14</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represent the measured absorption coefficients at 470, 530, and 660 nm,
respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cal</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the absorption coefficient calculated from the AAE attribution method at
470 nm. Actually, this assumption is not always true as the AAE varies with
both the wavelength and core size and coating thickness of BC particles
(Lack
and Cappa, 2010; Wang et al., 2016). The results of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
shown in Fig. 7, with averages of all flights below 5 %, roughly a factor
of 3 smaller than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the optical closure approach.</p>
      <p id="d1e4975">The AAE attribution method is widely used for its simplicity, while there is
one caveat that need to be noted when applying this method. The absorption
coefficients and AAE, in this case, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, should be for BC only, without
contributions from other absorbers, such as BrC (Lack and Cappa, 2010).
However, it is usually very difficult to completely exclude the impact of
these absorbers in the calculation. The homogeneous models are usually
reported to overestimate BC absorption
(H. Zhang
et al., 2015; Fierce et al., 2017b; Taylor et al., 2020) and hence
underestimate BrC absorption, while the values of the contribution of BrC
determined by the AAE attribution method are even lower than those from the
homogeneous methods, which we suspect might be partly attributed to the
impact of absorbers besides BC. Therefore, we evaluated the absorption
attribution at detected wavelengths by taking RF06_1 as an
example. The contribution of BrC derived from the AAE attribution method is
2 % for RF06_1, approximately a factor of 5 smaller
than that from the optical closure method with the BG model, 11 % (Figs. 7
and 8). As illustrated in Fig. 8, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> includes the
contribution of BrC, which accounts for 4 % of the total absorption, and
that of absorbers beyond BC and BrC, which accounts for 21 %. Note this
attribution is based on the BC absorption coefficient calculated from the BG
model with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which yields an upper bound of BC
absorption (Liu et al., 2021). All calculated parameters are subject to
uncertainties as discussed in Sect. S3. If we remove the
4 % BrC from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mea</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (13), the BrC contribution to
absorption at 470 nm would increase to 6 %, 2 times larger than 2 %,
indicating a substantial impact of BrC on the result of the AAE attribution
method, even though the BrC absorption may only exist as a small portion.
Thus, we recommend that application of any optical property-based
attribution method to use absorption coefficients at the longest possible
wavelength to minimize the influence of BrC and, in the meanwhile, to
account for potential contributions from other absorbing materials.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e5096">We investigated the contribution of BrC to the total absorption of BB
aerosols with different models utilizing measurements from ORACLES 2018
field campaign. An effective BC refractive index,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that was constrained by absorption measurements
to account for all absorbing components at 660 nm, was introduced in this
study. Most of the values derived for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were greater than the
commonly used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, suggesting contributions from absorbing
materials besides BC at 660 nm. TEM-EDX single-particle analysis further
suggests that these absorbers might include FeOx that absorbs at long
visible wavelengths, i.e. magnetite, as Fe is only present for flights with
large values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. RF05_3 yielded the largest values
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, approximately 60 %–100 % greater than that of other flights,
implying a greater contribution of absorbers besides BC to the total
absorption at 660 nm than other flights, which might be due to a larger
amount of magnetite in these samples or the result of possible absorbing
titanium compounds, which are present on this filter.</p>
      <p id="d1e5167">As refractive indices of BC and magnetite are generally constant over the
range of wavelengths considered, i.e. 470 and 660 nm, we assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eBC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
be independent of wavelength and calculated MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the contribution
of BrC to total absorption at 470 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with different models.
The values of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mn>.470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the three homogeneous
mixing models were fairly close to each other, while those from the CS model
were much higher, underscoring the importance of model treatment. The values
of MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mn>.470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the CS model for RF10 and from
homogeneous models for other flights are found to be more plausible, based
on the morphology of BC-containing particles from TEM analysis, MR values
from SP2, and the contribution of WSOC to the total absorption at 365 nm.
The values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–22 %, with
MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mn>.470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varying between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the various flights. Values from our
results were generally comparable to or slightly higher than the MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 405 nm for highly aged aerosols from CLARIFY 2017, which were sampled
downwind of ORACLES, while under a much longer wavelength, i.e. 470 nm,
implying the bleaching of BrC during transport. High MAC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OA</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed for
RF05_1 and RF05_2, respectively, which is
suspected to be caused by hematite, an abundant FeOx in African dust, which
may have mixed with the BC particles in RF05_1 and
RF05_2 during the 11 d transport. Measurements of a modified
SP2 that can distinguish between hematite and magnetite and obtain FeOx
concentrations are highly recommended.</p>
      <p id="d1e5479">Contribution of BrC to the total absorption obtained from the AAE
attribution method, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was calculated and compared to that
from our optical closure method. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">470</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is generally <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, approximately a factor of 3 smaller than that from our optical
closure method. Absorption attribution using the Bruggeman mixing Mie model
suggests a minor BrC contribution of 4 % at 530 nm for RF06_1, and its removal would triple the BrC contribution to the total absorption
at 470 nm from 2 % to 6 % obtained using the AAE attribution method,
suggesting a substantial impact of BrC to the result of AAE attribution
method, even though the BrC may only exist as a small portion. Thus, when
applying optical property-based attribution methods, it is recommended to
use the absorption coefficient at the longest possible wavelength to
minimize the influence of BrC and to account for other absorbers.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5539">Airborne measurements are available via
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Suborbital/ORACLES/P3/2018_V2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/Suborbital/ORACLES/P3/2018_V2</ext-link> (ORACLES Science Team, 2020).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5545">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9199-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9199-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5554">MSR and LZ developed the ideas for the direction of the paper. MSR, AJS,
ERL, AD, JPSW, PF, SGH, and AN carried out the airborne measurements. MSR, HC,
CD, AJS, ERL, AD, JPSW, SGH, and AN processed the aircraft data. LZ and HC
performed the data analysis. LZ prepared the paper with inputs and comments
from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5560">At least one of the (co-)authors is a guest member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic> for the special issue “New observations
and related modelling studies of the aerosol-cloud-climate system in the
Southeast Atlantic and southern Africa regions”. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e5569">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5575">This article is part of the special issue “New observations and related modelling studies of the aerosol–cloud–climate system in the Southeast Atlantic and southern Africa regions (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5581">Lu Zhang would like to thank the postdoctoral fellowship funding from Tel
Aviv University, Department of Exact Sciences. Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer and
Haochi Che were funded by United States Department of Energy (DOE)
Atmospheric System Research (ASR) grant DE-SC0020084. Caroline Dang was
funded by a NASA postdoctoral fellowship. Arthur J. Sedlacek III and Ernie R. Lewis were funded by the Scientific Focus Area (SFA) Science Plan program
that is supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in
the Department of Energy, Office of Science, through the United States
Department of Energy contract no. DE-SC0012704 to Brookhaven National
Laboratory. Paola Formenti is supported by the AErosols, RadiatiOn and
CLOuds in southern Africa (AEROCLO-sA) project funded by the French National
Research Agency under grant agreement no. ANR-15-CE01-0014-01, the
French national programs LEFE/INSU and PNTS, the French National Agency for
Space Studies (CNES), the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme
(FP7/2014-2018) under EUFAR2 contract no. 312609, and the South
African National Research Foundation (NRF) under grant UID 105958. The
authors would like to thank the ORACLES team and the two anonymous reviewers
for their helpful comments.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5586">This research has been supported by the Tel Aviv University (postdoctoral fellowship); the United States Department of Energy (DOE)
Atmospheric System Research (ASR; grant DE-SC0020084); a NASA postdoctoral fellowship; the Scientific Focus Area (SFA) Science Plan program
that is supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in
the Department of Energy, Office of Science, through the United States
Department of Energy (contract no. DE-SC0012704) to Brookhaven National
Laboratory; the AErosols, RadiatiOn and
CLOuds in southern Africa (AEROCLO-sA) project funded by the French National
Research Agency (grant agreement no. ANR-15-CE01-0014-01); the
French national programs LEFE/INSU and PNTS; the French National Agency for
Space Studies (CNES); the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme
(FP7/2014-2018; EUFAR2 contract no. 312609); and the South
African National Research Foundation (NRF; grant UID 105958).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5592">This paper was edited by Frank Eckardt and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ackerman, T. P. and Toon, O. B.: Absorption of visible radiation in
atmosphere containing mixtures of absorbing and nonabsorbing particles,
Appl. Optics, 20, 3661–3668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.20.003661" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.20.003661</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Adler, G., Wagner, N. L., Lamb, K. D., Manfred, K. M., Schwarz, J. P.,
Franchin, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Womack, C. C.,
Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, D. M.: Evidence in biomass burning smoke for a
light-absorbing aerosol with properties intermediate between brown and black
carbon, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 53, 976–989,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1617832" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1617832</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous
Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 27–67,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Habib, G., and Bergstrom, R. W.: Limitations in the enhancement
of visible light absorption due to mixing state,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D20211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007315" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007315</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brown, H., Liu, X., Feng, Y., Jiang, Y., Wu, M., Lu, Z., Wu, C., Murphy, S., and Pokhrel, R.: Radiative effect and climate impacts of brown carbon with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17745–17768, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17745-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17745-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chang, H. and Charalampopoulos, T. T.: Determination of the wavelength dependence of refractive indices of flame soot, P. Roy. Soc. A, 430, 577–591, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1990.0107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.1990.0107</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Che, H., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Zhang, L., Dang, C., Zuidema, P., Sedlacek III, A. J., Zhang, X., and Flynn, C.: Seasonal variations in fire conditions are important drivers in the trend of aerosol optical properties over the south-eastern Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8767–8785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8767-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-8767-2022</ext-link>, 2022a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Che, H., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Zhang, L., Dang, C., Zuidema, P., Dobracki, A., Sedlacek III, A. J., Coe, H., Wu, H., Taylor, J., Zhang, X., Redemann, J., and Haywood, J.: Cloud processing and weeklong ageing affect biomass burning aerosol properties over the south-eastern Atlantic, Commun. Earth Environ., accepted, 2022b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chylek, P., Lee, J. E., Romonosky, D. E., Gallo, F., Lou, S., Shrivastava,
M., Carrico, C. M., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.: Mie Scattering Captures
Observed Optical Properties of Ambient Biomass Burning Plumes Assuming
Uniform Black, Brown, and Organic Carbon Mixtures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 11406–11427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031224</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cotterell, M. I., Willoughby, R. E., Bzdek, B. R., Orr-Ewing, A. J., and Reid, J. P.: A complete parameterisation of the relative humidity and wavelength dependence of the refractive index of hygroscopic inorganic aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9837–9851, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9837-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-9837-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cui, X., Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, B., Chen, J., Andersson, A., and
Gustafsson, Ö.: Radiative absorption enhancement from coatings on black
carbon aerosols, Sci. Total Environ., 551–552, 51–56,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.026</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dang, C., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Che, H., Zhang, L., Formenti, P., Taylor, J., Dobracki, A., Purdue, S., Wong, P.-S., Nenes, A., Sedlacek, A., Coe, H., Redemann, J., Zuidema, P., and Haywood, J.: Biomass burning and marine aerosol processing over the southeast Atlantic Ocean: A TEM single particle analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-724" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2021-724</ext-link>, in review, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward Reduced Representation of
Mixing State for Simulating Aerosol Effects on Climate, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 98, 971–980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward Reduced Representation of
Mixing State for Simulating Aerosol Effects on Climate, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 98, 971–980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Zieger, P., Gysel, M., Kammermann, L., DeCarlo, P. F., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Measured and predicted aerosol light scattering enhancement factors at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2319–2333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fischer, E. V., Jaffe, D. A., Marley, N. A., Gaffney, J. S., and
Marchany-Rivera, A.: Optical properties of aged Asian aerosols observed over
the U.S. Pacific Northwest, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D20209,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013943" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD013943</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Formenti, P., Caquineau, S., Desboeufs, K., Klaver, A., Chevaillier, S., Journet, E., and Rajot, J. L.: Mapping the physico-chemical properties of mineral dust in western Africa: mineralogical composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10663–10686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10663-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10663-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, R. S., Schwarz, J. P., Kelly, K. K., Fahey, D. W., Watts, L. A.,
Thompson, T. L., Spackman, J. R., Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J.-H.,
Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., and Worsnop, D. R.: A Novel Method for
Estimating Light-Scattering Properties of Soot Aerosols Using a Modified
Single-Particle Soot Photometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 41, 125–135,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820601118398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820601118398</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Go, S., Lyapustin, A., Schuster, G. L., Choi, M., Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Kalashnikova, O., Dubovik, O., Kim, J., da Silva, A., Holben, B., and Reid, J. S.: Inferring iron-oxide species content in atmospheric mineral dust from DSCOVR EPIC observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1395–1423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1395-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-1395-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gysel, M., Crosier, J., Topping, D. O., Whitehead, J. D., Bower, K. N., Cubison, M. J., Williams, P. I., Flynn, M. J., McFiggans, G. B., and Coe, H.: Closure study between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6131–6144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haywood, J. M., Abel, S. J., Barrett, P. A., Bellouin, N., Blyth, A., Bower, K. N., Brooks, M., Carslaw, K., Che, H., Coe, H., Cotterell, M. I., Crawford, I., Cui, Z., Davies, N., Dingley, B., Field, P., Formenti, P., Gordon, H., de Graaf, M., Herbert, R., Johnson, B., Jones, A. C., Langridge, J. M., Malavelle, F., Partridge, D. G., Peers, F., Redemann, J., Stier, P., Szpek, K., Taylor, J. W., Watson-Parris, D., Wood, R., Wu, H., and Zuidema, P.: The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1049–1084, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1049-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1049-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>He, C., Takano, Y., Liou, K.-N., Yang, P., Li, Q., and Mackowski, D. W.:
Intercomparison of the GOS approach, superposition T-matrix method, and
laboratory measurements for black carbon optical properties during aging, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 184, 287–296,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.08.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.08.004</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hems, R. F., Schnitzler, E. G., Liu-Kang, C., Cappa, C. D., and Abbatt, J.
P. D.: Aging of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Aerosol, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5,
722–748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00346</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ito, A., Lin, G., and Penner, J. E.: Radiative forcing by light-absorbing
aerosols of pyrogenetic iron oxides, Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 7347,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25756-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-25756-3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jacobson, M. Z.: Investigating cloud absorption effects: Global absorption
properties of black carbon, tar balls, and soil dust in clouds and aerosols,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D06205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017218</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Lee, S., Kim, S.-W., and Zhang, X.: A global simulation of brown carbon: implications for photochemistry and direct radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3413–3432, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kahnert, M. and Kanngießer, F.: Modelling optical properties of
atmospheric black carbon aerosols, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra.,
244, 106849, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106849" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106849</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kasthuriarachchi, N. Y., Rivellini, L.-H., Adam, M. G., and Lee, A. K. Y.:
Light Absorbing Properties of Primary and Secondary Brown Carbon in a
Tropical Urban Environment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 10808–10819,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02414" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c02414</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuang, Y., He, Y., Xu, W., Zhao, P., Cheng, Y., Zhao, G., Tao, J., Ma, N., Su, H., Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Cheng, P., Yang, W., Zhang, S., Wu, C., Sun, Y., and Zhao, C.: Distinct diurnal variation in organic aerosol hygroscopicity and its relationship with oxygenated organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 865–880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-865-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-865-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kurisu, M., Adachi, K., Sakata, K., and Takahashi, Y.: Stable Isotope Ratios
of Combustion Iron Produced by Evaporation in a Steel Plant, ACS Earth Space
Chem., 3, 588–598, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00171</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laborde, M., Mertes, P., Zieger, P., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel, M.: Sensitivity of the Single Particle Soot Photometer to different black carbon types, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1031–1043, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A. and Cappa, C. D.: Impact of brown and clear carbon on light absorption enhancement, single scatter albedo and absorption wavelength dependence of black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4207–4220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A. and Langridge, J. M.: On the attribution of black and brown carbon light absorption using the Ångström exponent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10535–10543, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A., Langridge, J. M., Bahreini, R., Cappa, C. D., Middlebrook, A.
M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Brown carbon and internal mixing in biomass burning
particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 14802–14807,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1206575109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lamb, K. D., Matsui, H., Katich, J. M., Perring, A. E., Spackman, J. R., Weinzierl, B., Dollner, M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Global-scale constraints on light-absorbing anthropogenic iron oxide aerosols, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 4, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-021-00171-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-021-00171-0</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lesins, G., Chylek, P., and Lohmann, U.: A study of internal and external
mixing scenarios and its effect on aerosol optical properties and direct
radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, AAC 5-1–AAC 5-12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000973" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000973</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, C., He, Q., Schade, J., Passig, J., Zimmermann, R., Meidan, D., Laskin, A., and Rudich, Y.: Dynamic changes in optical and chemical properties of tar ball aerosols by atmospheric photochemical aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 139–163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-139-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-139-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liati, A., Pandurangi, S. S., Boulouchos, K., Schreiber, D., and Arroyo
Rojas Dasilva, Y.: Metal nanoparticles in diesel exhaust derived by
in-cylinder melting of detached engine fragments, Atmos. Environ., 101,
34–40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.014</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a
Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11561–11570,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, C., Chung, C. E., Yin, Y., and Schnaiter, M.: The absorption Ångström exponent of black carbon: from numerical aspects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6259–6273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Young, D. E., Flynn, M. J., Coe, H., and Allan, J.
D.: The effect of complex black carbon microphysics on the determination of
the optical properties of brown carbon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 613–619,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062443</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2901</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Li, S., Hu, D., Kong, S., Cheng, Y., Wu, Y., Ding, S., Hu, K.,
Zheng, S., Yan, Q., Zheng, H., Zhao, D., Tian, P., Ye, J., Huang, M., and
Ding, D.: Evolution of Aerosol Optical Properties from Wood Smoke in Real
Atmosphere Influenced by Burning Phase and Solar Radiation, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 55, 5677–5688, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07569" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c07569</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Machemer, S. D.: Characterization of Airborne and Bulk Particulate from Iron
and Steel Manufacturing Facilities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 381–389,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es020897v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es020897v</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Meter, S. L., Formenti, P., Piketh, S. J., Annegarn, H. J., and Kneen, M.
A.: PIXE investigation of aerosol composition over the Zambian Copperbelt,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 150,
433–438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(98)01020-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0168-583X(98)01020-9</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moise, T., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: Optical Properties of Secondary Organic Aerosols and Their Changes by Chemical Processes, Chem. Rev., 115, 4400–4439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5005259</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., and Nakamura, S.: Method to measure refractive
indices of small nonspherical particles: Application to black carbon
particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 513–521,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moteki, N., Adachi, K., Ohata, S., Yoshida, A., Harigaya, T., Koike, M., and
Kondo, Y.: Anthropogenic iron oxide aerosols enhance atmospheric heating,
Nat. Commun., 8, 15329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15329" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms15329</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ORACLES Science Team: ORACLES data archive, Moffett Field, CA, NASA Ames Earth Science Project Office (ESPO), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Suborbital/ORACLES/P3/2018_V2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/Suborbital/ORACLES/P3/2018_V2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Palm, K. J., Murray, J. B., Narayan, T. C., and Munday, J. N.: Dynamic
optical properties of metal hydrides, ACS Photonics, 5, 4677–4686,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01243</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M.,
Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D.
R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct
radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1602310113</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pflüger, J. and Fink, J.: Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids,
Academic Press, 293–310 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012544415-6.50055-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-012544415-6.50055-8</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Redemann, J., Wood, R., Zuidema, P., Doherty, S. J., Luna, B., LeBlanc, S. E., Diamond, M. S., Shinozuka, Y., Chang, I. Y., Ueyama, R., Pfister, L., Ryoo, J.-M., Dobracki, A. N., da Silva, A. M., Longo, K. M., Kacenelenbogen, M. S., Flynn, C. J., Pistone, K., Knox, N. M., Piketh, S. J., Haywood, J. M., Formenti, P., Mallet, M., Stier, P., Ackerman, A. S., Bauer, S. E., Fridlind, A. M., Carmichael, G. R., Saide, P. E., Ferrada, G. A., Howell, S. G., Freitag, S., Cairns, B., Holben, B. N., Knobelspiesse, K. D., Tanelli, S., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Dzambo, A. M., Sy, O. O., McFarquhar, G. M., Poellot, M. R., Gupta, S., O'Brien, J. R., Nenes, A., Kacarab, M., Wong, J. P. S., Small-Griswold, J. D., Thornhill, K. L., Noone, D., Podolske, J. R., Schmidt, K. S., Pilewskie, P., Chen, H., Cochrane, S. P., Sedlacek, A. J., Lang, T. J., Stith, E., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Ferrare, R. A., Burton, S. P., Hostetler, C. A., Diner, D. J., Seidel, F. C., Platnick, S. E., Myers, J. S., Meyer, K. G., Spangenberg, D. A., Maring, H., and Gao, L.: An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1507–1563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1507-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-1507-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Hennigan, C. J., McMeeking, G. R., Chuang, W. K., Robinson, E. S., Coe, H., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Absorptivity of brown carbon in fresh and photo-chemically aged biomass-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7683–7693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Robinson, E. S., Tkacik, D. S., Ahern, A. T., Liu, S., Aiken, A.
C., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., Dubey, M. K., Yokelson, R. J., Donahue,
N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass
burning linked to their black carbon content, Nat. Geosci., 7, 647–650,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2220</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saleh, R., Marks, M., Heo, J., Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson,
A. L.: Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative
effect of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10285–10296,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023697</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scarnato, B. V., Vahidinia, S., Richard, D. T., and Kirchstetter, T. W.: Effects of internal mixing and aggregate morphology on optical properties of black carbon using a discrete dipole approximation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5089–5101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5089-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5089-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A.,
Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G.
L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B.,
Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O.,
Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of
midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary
layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D16207,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007076</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sedlacek III, A. J., Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Onasch, T. B., Springston, S. R., and Kleinman, L.: Formation and evolution of tar balls from northwestern US wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11289–11301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shengo, M. L., Kime, M.-B., Mambwe, M. P., and Nyembo, T. K.: A review of
the beneficiation of copper-cobalt-bearing minerals in the Democratic
Republic of Congo, J. Sustain. Min., 18, 226–246,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2019.08.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsm.2019.08.001</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sikamo, J., Mwanza, A., and Mweemba, C.: Copper mining in Zambia – history
and future, J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 116, 491–496,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n6a1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n6a1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sumlin, B. J., Heinson, W. R., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Retrieving the aerosol complex refractive index using PyMieScatt: A Mie computational package with visualization capabilities, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 205, 127–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.10.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.10.012</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. D.,
Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger,
N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The
Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
817–922, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009157896.008</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Taylor, J. W., Wu, H., Szpek, K., Bower, K., Crawford, I., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Davies, N. W., Haywood, J. M., and Coe, H.: Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11201–11221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thompson, G. and Eidhammer, T.: A Study of Aerosol Impacts on Clouds and
Precipitation Development in a Large Winter Cyclone, J. Atmos. Sci.,
71, 3636–3658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0305.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-13-0305.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Till, J. L., Guyodo, Y., Lagroix, F., Morin, G., and Ona-Nguema, G.: Goethite as a potential source of magnetic nanoparticles in sediments, Geology, 43, 75–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G36186.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G36186.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Mu, M., Kasibhatla, P. S., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Jin, Y., and van Leeuwen, T. T.: Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11707–11735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Virkkula, A.: Correction of the Calibration of the 3-wavelength Particle
Soot Absorption Photometer (3ë PSAP), Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44,
706–712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.482110</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vítková, M., Ettler, V., Johan, Z., Køíbek, B., Šebek,
O., and Mihaljeviè, M.: Primary and secondary phases in copper-cobalt
smelting slags from the Copperbelt Province, Zambia, Mineral. Mag., 74,
581–600, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2010.074.4.581" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1180/minmag.2010.074.4.581</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Nie, W., Cheng, Y., Shen, Y., Chi, X., Wang, J., Huang, X., Xie, Y., Sun, P., Xu, Z., Qi, X., Su, H., and Ding, A.: Light absorption of brown carbon in eastern China based on 3-year multi-wavelength aerosol optical property observations and an improved absorption Ångström exponent segregation method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9061–9074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Li, Z., Tian, Q., Ma, Y., Zhang, F., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Li, K.,
and Li, L.: Estimate of aerosol absorbing components of black carbon, brown
carbon, and dust from ground-based remote sensing data of sun-sky
radiometers, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 6534–6543,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50356</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Sedlacek, A. J., de Sá, S. S., Martin, S. T., Alexander, M. L., Watson, T. B., Aiken, A. C., Springston, S. R., and Artaxo, P.: Deriving brown carbon from multiwavelength absorption measurements: method and application to AERONET and Aethalometer observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12733–12752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Liu, J., Weber, R. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Schwarz, J. P., and Perring, A. E.: Exploring the observational constraints on the simulation of brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 635–653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-635-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-635-2018</ext-link>, 2018</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Tsagkaraki, M., Tsiodra, I., Mihalopoulos, N., Violaki, K., Kanakidou, M., Sciare, J., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Atmospheric evolution of molecular-weight-separated brown carbon from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7319–7334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7319-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7319-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yoshida, A., Moteki, N., Ohata, S., Mori, T., Tada, R.,
Dagsson-Waldhauserová, P., and Kondo, Y.: Detection of light-absorbing
iron oxide particles using a modified single-particle soot photometer,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 50, 1–4,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1146402" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2016.1146402</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Zhou, C., Wang, Z., Zhao, S., and Li, J.: The influence of
different black carbon and sulfate mixing methods on their optical and
radiative properties, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 161, 105–116,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.04.002</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. L., Wu, G. J., Zhang, C. L., Xu, T. L., and Zhou, Q. Q.: What is the real role of iron oxides in the optical properties of dust aerosols?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12159–12177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12159-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12159-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Light absorption by brown carbon over the South-East Atlantic Ocean</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ackerman, T. P. and Toon, O. B.: Absorption of visible radiation in
atmosphere containing mixtures of absorbing and nonabsorbing particles,
Appl. Optics, 20, 3661–3668, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.20.003661" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.20.003661</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, G., Wagner, N. L., Lamb, K. D., Manfred, K. M., Schwarz, J. P.,
Franchin, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Washenfelder, R. A., Womack, C. C.,
Yokelson, R. J., and Murphy, D. M.: Evidence in biomass burning smoke for a
light-absorbing aerosol with properties intermediate between brown and black
carbon, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 53, 976–989,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1617832" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1617832</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous
Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 27–67,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Habib, G., and Bergstrom, R. W.: Limitations in the enhancement
of visible light absorption due to mixing state,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D20211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007315" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007315</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, H., Liu, X., Feng, Y., Jiang, Y., Wu, M., Lu, Z., Wu, C., Murphy, S., and Pokhrel, R.: Radiative effect and climate impacts of brown carbon with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17745–17768, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17745-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17745-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, H. and Charalampopoulos, T. T.: Determination of the wavelength dependence of refractive indices of flame soot, P. Roy. Soc. A, 430, 577–591, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1990.0107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1990.0107</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Che, H., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Zhang, L., Dang, C., Zuidema, P., Sedlacek III, A. J., Zhang, X., and Flynn, C.: Seasonal variations in fire conditions are important drivers in the trend of aerosol optical properties over the south-eastern Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8767–8785, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8767-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8767-2022</a>, 2022a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Che, H., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Zhang, L., Dang, C., Zuidema, P., Dobracki, A., Sedlacek III, A. J., Coe, H., Wu, H., Taylor, J., Zhang, X., Redemann, J., and Haywood, J.: Cloud processing and weeklong ageing affect biomass burning aerosol properties over the south-eastern Atlantic, Commun. Earth Environ., accepted, 2022b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y. and Bond, T. C.: Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1773–1787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1773-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chylek, P., Lee, J. E., Romonosky, D. E., Gallo, F., Lou, S., Shrivastava,
M., Carrico, C. M., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.: Mie Scattering Captures
Observed Optical Properties of Ambient Biomass Burning Plumes Assuming
Uniform Black, Brown, and Organic Carbon Mixtures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 11406–11427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031224</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cotterell, M. I., Willoughby, R. E., Bzdek, B. R., Orr-Ewing, A. J., and Reid, J. P.: A complete parameterisation of the relative humidity and wavelength dependence of the refractive index of hygroscopic inorganic aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9837–9851, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9837-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9837-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cui, X., Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, B., Chen, J., Andersson, A., and
Gustafsson, Ö.: Radiative absorption enhancement from coatings on black
carbon aerosols, Sci. Total Environ., 551–552, 51–56,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.026</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dang, C., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Che, H., Zhang, L., Formenti, P., Taylor, J., Dobracki, A., Purdue, S., Wong, P.-S., Nenes, A., Sedlacek, A., Coe, H., Redemann, J., Zuidema, P., and Haywood, J.: Biomass burning and marine aerosol processing over the southeast Atlantic Ocean: A TEM single particle analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-724" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-724</a>, in review, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Brown carbon: a significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607–8621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward Reduced Representation of
Mixing State for Simulating Aerosol Effects on Climate, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 98, 971–980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Fierce, L., Riemer, N., and Bond, T. C.: Toward Reduced Representation of
Mixing State for Simulating Aerosol Effects on Climate, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 98, 971–980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Zieger, P., Gysel, M., Kammermann, L., DeCarlo, P. F., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Measured and predicted aerosol light scattering enhancement factors at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2319–2333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, E. V., Jaffe, D. A., Marley, N. A., Gaffney, J. S., and
Marchany-Rivera, A.: Optical properties of aged Asian aerosols observed over
the U.S. Pacific Northwest, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D20209,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013943" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013943</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Formenti, P., Caquineau, S., Desboeufs, K., Klaver, A., Chevaillier, S., Journet, E., and Rajot, J. L.: Mapping the physico-chemical properties of mineral dust in western Africa: mineralogical composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10663–10686, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10663-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10663-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, R. S., Schwarz, J. P., Kelly, K. K., Fahey, D. W., Watts, L. A.,
Thompson, T. L., Spackman, J. R., Slowik, J. G., Cross, E. S., Han, J.-H.,
Davidovits, P., Onasch, T. B., and Worsnop, D. R.: A Novel Method for
Estimating Light-Scattering Properties of Soot Aerosols Using a Modified
Single-Particle Soot Photometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 41, 125–135,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820601118398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820601118398</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Go, S., Lyapustin, A., Schuster, G. L., Choi, M., Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Kalashnikova, O., Dubovik, O., Kim, J., da Silva, A., Holben, B., and Reid, J. S.: Inferring iron-oxide species content in atmospheric mineral dust from DSCOVR EPIC observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1395–1423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1395-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1395-2022</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gysel, M., Crosier, J., Topping, D. O., Whitehead, J. D., Bower, K. N., Cubison, M. J., Williams, P. I., Flynn, M. J., McFiggans, G. B., and Coe, H.: Closure study between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6131–6144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J. M., Abel, S. J., Barrett, P. A., Bellouin, N., Blyth, A., Bower, K. N., Brooks, M., Carslaw, K., Che, H., Coe, H., Cotterell, M. I., Crawford, I., Cui, Z., Davies, N., Dingley, B., Field, P., Formenti, P., Gordon, H., de Graaf, M., Herbert, R., Johnson, B., Jones, A. C., Langridge, J. M., Malavelle, F., Partridge, D. G., Peers, F., Redemann, J., Stier, P., Szpek, K., Taylor, J. W., Watson-Parris, D., Wood, R., Wu, H., and Zuidema, P.: The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1049–1084, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1049-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1049-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
He, C., Takano, Y., Liou, K.-N., Yang, P., Li, Q., and Mackowski, D. W.:
Intercomparison of the GOS approach, superposition T-matrix method, and
laboratory measurements for black carbon optical properties during aging, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 184, 287–296,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.08.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.08.004</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hems, R. F., Schnitzler, E. G., Liu-Kang, C., Cappa, C. D., and Abbatt, J.
P. D.: Aging of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Aerosol, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5,
722–748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00346</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, A., Lin, G., and Penner, J. E.: Radiative forcing by light-absorbing
aerosols of pyrogenetic iron oxides, Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 7347,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25756-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25756-3</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobson, M. Z.: Investigating cloud absorption effects: Global absorption
properties of black carbon, tar balls, and soil dust in clouds and aerosols,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D06205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017218" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017218</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jo, D. S., Park, R. J., Lee, S., Kim, S.-W., and Zhang, X.: A global simulation of brown carbon: implications for photochemistry and direct radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3413–3432, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kahnert, M. and Kanngießer, F.: Modelling optical properties of
atmospheric black carbon aerosols, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra.,
244, 106849, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106849" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106849</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kasthuriarachchi, N. Y., Rivellini, L.-H., Adam, M. G., and Lee, A. K. Y.:
Light Absorbing Properties of Primary and Secondary Brown Carbon in a
Tropical Urban Environment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 10808–10819,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02414" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02414</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchstetter, T. W. and Thatcher, T. L.: Contribution of organic carbon to wood smoke particulate matter absorption of solar radiation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6067–6072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6067-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kuang, Y., He, Y., Xu, W., Zhao, P., Cheng, Y., Zhao, G., Tao, J., Ma, N., Su, H., Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Cheng, P., Yang, W., Zhang, S., Wu, C., Sun, Y., and Zhao, C.: Distinct diurnal variation in organic aerosol hygroscopicity and its relationship with oxygenated organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 865–880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-865-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-865-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kurisu, M., Adachi, K., Sakata, K., and Takahashi, Y.: Stable Isotope Ratios
of Combustion Iron Produced by Evaporation in a Steel Plant, ACS Earth Space
Chem., 3, 588–598, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00171</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Laborde, M., Mertes, P., Zieger, P., Dommen, J., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel, M.: Sensitivity of the Single Particle Soot Photometer to different black carbon types, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1031–1043, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1031-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A. and Cappa, C. D.: Impact of brown and clear carbon on light absorption enhancement, single scatter albedo and absorption wavelength dependence of black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4207–4220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A. and Langridge, J. M.: On the attribution of black and brown carbon light absorption using the Ångström exponent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10535–10543, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lack, D. A., Langridge, J. M., Bahreini, R., Cappa, C. D., Middlebrook, A.
M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Brown carbon and internal mixing in biomass burning
particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 14802–14807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206575109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lamb, K. D., Matsui, H., Katich, J. M., Perring, A. E., Spackman, J. R., Weinzierl, B., Dollner, M., and Schwarz, J. P.: Global-scale constraints on light-absorbing anthropogenic iron oxide aerosols, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 4, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-021-00171-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-021-00171-0</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of Atmospheric
Brown Carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lesins, G., Chylek, P., and Lohmann, U.: A study of internal and external
mixing scenarios and its effect on aerosol optical properties and direct
radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, AAC 5-1–AAC 5-12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000973" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000973</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., He, Q., Schade, J., Passig, J., Zimmermann, R., Meidan, D., Laskin, A., and Rudich, Y.: Dynamic changes in optical and chemical properties of tar ball aerosols by atmospheric photochemical aging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 139–163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-139-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-139-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Liati, A., Pandurangi, S. S., Boulouchos, K., Schreiber, D., and Arroyo
Rojas Dasilva, Y.: Metal nanoparticles in diesel exhaust derived by
in-cylinder melting of detached engine fragments, Atmos. Environ., 101,
34–40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.014</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, P., Bluvshtein, N., Rudich, Y., Nizkorodov, S. A., Laskin, J., and
Laskin, A.: Molecular Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon Inferred from a
Nationwide Biomass Burning Event, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 11561–11570,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02276</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, C., Chung, C. E., Yin, Y., and Schnaiter, M.: The absorption Ångström exponent of black carbon: from numerical aspects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6259–6273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Taylor, J. W., Young, D. E., Flynn, M. J., Coe, H., and Allan, J.
D.: The effect of complex black carbon microphysics on the determination of
the optical properties of brown carbon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 613–619,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062443" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062443</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen, D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C., Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T., McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat. Geosci., 10, 184–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2901</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Li, S., Hu, D., Kong, S., Cheng, Y., Wu, Y., Ding, S., Hu, K.,
Zheng, S., Yan, Q., Zheng, H., Zhao, D., Tian, P., Ye, J., Huang, M., and
Ding, D.: Evolution of Aerosol Optical Properties from Wood Smoke in Real
Atmosphere Influenced by Burning Phase and Solar Radiation, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 55, 5677–5688, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07569" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07569</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Machemer, S. D.: Characterization of Airborne and Bulk Particulate from Iron
and Steel Manufacturing Facilities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 381–389,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es020897v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es020897v</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Meter, S. L., Formenti, P., Piketh, S. J., Annegarn, H. J., and Kneen, M.
A.: PIXE investigation of aerosol composition over the Zambian Copperbelt,
Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 150,
433–438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(98)01020-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(98)01020-9</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Moise, T., Flores, J. M., and Rudich, Y.: Optical Properties of Secondary Organic Aerosols and Their Changes by Chemical Processes, Chem. Rev., 115, 4400–4439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005259</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., and Nakamura, S.: Method to measure refractive
indices of small nonspherical particles: Application to black carbon
particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 41, 513–521,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.02.013</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Moteki, N., Adachi, K., Ohata, S., Yoshida, A., Harigaya, T., Koike, M., and
Kondo, Y.: Anthropogenic iron oxide aerosols enhance atmospheric heating,
Nat. Commun., 8, 15329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15329" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15329</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
ORACLES Science Team: ORACLES data archive, Moffett Field, CA, NASA Ames Earth Science Project Office (ESPO), <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Suborbital/ORACLES/P3/2018_V2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/Suborbital/ORACLES/P3/2018_V2</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Palm, K. J., Murray, J. B., Narayan, T. C., and Munday, J. N.: Dynamic
optical properties of metal hydrides, ACS Photonics, 5, 4677–4686,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01243</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M.,
Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y.-S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D.
R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct
radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602310113</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Pflüger, J. and Fink, J.: Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids,
Academic Press, 293–310 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012544415-6.50055-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012544415-6.50055-8</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Redemann, J., Wood, R., Zuidema, P., Doherty, S. J., Luna, B., LeBlanc, S. E., Diamond, M. S., Shinozuka, Y., Chang, I. Y., Ueyama, R., Pfister, L., Ryoo, J.-M., Dobracki, A. N., da Silva, A. M., Longo, K. M., Kacenelenbogen, M. S., Flynn, C. J., Pistone, K., Knox, N. M., Piketh, S. J., Haywood, J. M., Formenti, P., Mallet, M., Stier, P., Ackerman, A. S., Bauer, S. E., Fridlind, A. M., Carmichael, G. R., Saide, P. E., Ferrada, G. A., Howell, S. G., Freitag, S., Cairns, B., Holben, B. N., Knobelspiesse, K. D., Tanelli, S., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Dzambo, A. M., Sy, O. O., McFarquhar, G. M., Poellot, M. R., Gupta, S., O'Brien, J. R., Nenes, A., Kacarab, M., Wong, J. P. S., Small-Griswold, J. D., Thornhill, K. L., Noone, D., Podolske, J. R., Schmidt, K. S., Pilewskie, P., Chen, H., Cochrane, S. P., Sedlacek, A. J., Lang, T. J., Stith, E., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Ferrare, R. A., Burton, S. P., Hostetler, C. A., Diner, D. J., Seidel, F. C., Platnick, S. E., Myers, J. S., Meyer, K. G., Spangenberg, D. A., Maring, H., and Gao, L.: An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1507–1563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1507-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1507-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Saleh, R., Hennigan, C. J., McMeeking, G. R., Chuang, W. K., Robinson, E. S., Coe, H., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Absorptivity of brown carbon in fresh and photo-chemically aged biomass-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7683–7693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7683-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Saleh, R., Robinson, E. S., Tkacik, D. S., Ahern, A. T., Liu, S., Aiken, A.
C., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., Dubey, M. K., Yokelson, R. J., Donahue,
N. M., and Robinson, A. L.: Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass
burning linked to their black carbon content, Nat. Geosci., 7, 647–650,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Saleh, R., Marks, M., Heo, J., Adams, P. J., Donahue, N. M., and Robinson,
A. L.: Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative
effect of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10285–10296,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Scarnato, B. V., Vahidinia, S., Richard, D. T., and Kirchstetter, T. W.: Effects of internal mixing and aggregate morphology on optical properties of black carbon using a discrete dipole approximation model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5089–5101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5089-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5089-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A.,
Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G.
L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B.,
Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O.,
Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of
midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary
layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D16207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sedlacek III, A. J., Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Onasch, T. B., Springston, S. R., and Kleinman, L.: Formation and evolution of tar balls from northwestern US wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11289–11301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Shengo, M. L., Kime, M.-B., Mambwe, M. P., and Nyembo, T. K.: A review of
the beneficiation of copper-cobalt-bearing minerals in the Democratic
Republic of Congo, J. Sustain. Min., 18, 226–246,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2019.08.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2019.08.001</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Sikamo, J., Mwanza, A., and Mweemba, C.: Copper mining in Zambia – history
and future, J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 116, 491–496,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n6a1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n6a1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Sumlin, B. J., Heinson, W. R., and Chakrabarty, R. K.: Retrieving the aerosol complex refractive index using PyMieScatt: A Mie computational package with visualization capabilities, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 205, 127–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.10.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.10.012</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. D.,
Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger,
N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The
Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
817–922, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, J. W., Wu, H., Szpek, K., Bower, K., Crawford, I., Flynn, M. J., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J., Langridge, J. M., Cotterell, M. I., Fox, C., Davies, N. W., Haywood, J. M., and Coe, H.: Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11201–11221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11201-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, G. and Eidhammer, T.: A Study of Aerosol Impacts on Clouds and
Precipitation Development in a Large Winter Cyclone, J. Atmos. Sci.,
71, 3636–3658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0305.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0305.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Till, J. L., Guyodo, Y., Lagroix, F., Morin, G., and Ona-Nguema, G.: Goethite as a potential source of magnetic nanoparticles in sediments, Geology, 43, 75–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G36186.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G36186.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Mu, M., Kasibhatla, P. S., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Jin, Y., and van Leeuwen, T. T.: Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11707–11735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Virkkula, A.: Correction of the Calibration of the 3-wavelength Particle
Soot Absorption Photometer (3ë PSAP), Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44,
706–712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482110</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Vítková, M., Ettler, V., Johan, Z., Køíbek, B., Šebek,
O., and Mihaljeviè, M.: Primary and secondary phases in copper-cobalt
smelting slags from the Copperbelt Province, Zambia, Mineral. Mag., 74,
581–600, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2010.074.4.581" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2010.074.4.581</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Nie, W., Cheng, Y., Shen, Y., Chi, X., Wang, J., Huang, X., Xie, Y., Sun, P., Xu, Z., Qi, X., Su, H., and Ding, A.: Light absorption of brown carbon in eastern China based on 3-year multi-wavelength aerosol optical property observations and an improved absorption Ångström exponent segregation method, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9061–9074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9061-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L., Li, Z., Tian, Q., Ma, Y., Zhang, F., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Li, K.,
and Li, L.: Estimate of aerosol absorbing components of black carbon, brown
carbon, and dust from ground-based remote sensing data of sun-sky
radiometers, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 6534–6543,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50356</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Sedlacek, A. J., de Sá, S. S., Martin, S. T., Alexander, M. L., Watson, T. B., Aiken, A. C., Springston, S. R., and Artaxo, P.: Deriving brown carbon from multiwavelength absorption measurements: method and application to AERONET and Aethalometer observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12733–12752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12733-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Heald, C. L., Liu, J., Weber, R. J., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Schwarz, J. P., and Perring, A. E.: Exploring the observational constraints on the simulation of brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 635–653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-635-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-635-2018</a>, 2018
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, J. P. S., Tsagkaraki, M., Tsiodra, I., Mihalopoulos, N., Violaki, K., Kanakidou, M., Sciare, J., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Atmospheric evolution of molecular-weight-separated brown carbon from biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7319–7334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7319-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7319-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Yoshida, A., Moteki, N., Ohata, S., Mori, T., Tada, R.,
Dagsson-Waldhauserová, P., and Kondo, Y.: Detection of light-absorbing
iron oxide particles using a modified single-particle soot photometer,
Aerosol Sci. Technol., 50, 1–4,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1146402" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1146402</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Zhou, C., Wang, Z., Zhao, S., and Li, J.: The influence of
different black carbon and sulfate mixing methods on their optical and
radiative properties, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 161, 105–116,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.04.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.04.002</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. L., Wu, G. J., Zhang, C. L., Xu, T. L., and Zhou, Q. Q.: What is the real role of iron oxides in the optical properties of dust aerosols?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12159–12177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12159-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12159-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
