<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{o-ri-gi-nal}}?><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{va-lues}}?><?xmltex \hack{\hyphenation{major}}?><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-8175-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Aerosol atmospheric rivers: climatology, event characteristics, and detection algorithm sensitivities</article-title><alt-title>AARs: climatology, event characteristics, and detection algorithm sensitivities</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{AARs: climatology, event characteristics, and detection algorithm sensitivities}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. Chakraborty et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chakraborty</surname><given-names>Sudip</given-names></name>
          <email>sudip.chakraborty@jpl.nasa.gov</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Guan</surname><given-names>Bin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Waliser</surname><given-names>Duane E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>da Silva</surname><given-names>Arlindo M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3381-4030</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering,
University of California,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Los Angeles, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA/Goddard Space Flight
Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Sudip Chakraborty (sudip.chakraborty@jpl.nasa.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>8175</fpage><lpage>8195</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>5</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>May</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Sudip Chakraborty et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e128">Leveraging the concept of atmospheric rivers (ARs), a detection technique based on a widely utilized global algorithm to detect ARs (Guan and Waliser, 2019, 2015; Guan et al., 2018) was recently developed to detect aerosol atmospheric rivers (AARs) using the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2) reanalysis (Chakraborty et al., 2021a). The current study further characterizes and quantifies various details of AARs that were not provided in that study, such as the AARs' seasonality, event characteristics, vertical profiles of aerosol mass mixing ratio and wind speed, and the fraction of total annual aerosol transport conducted by AARs. Analysis is also performed to quantify the sensitivity of AAR detection to the criteria and thresholds used by the algorithm. AARs occur more frequently over, and typically extend from, regions with higher aerosol emission. For a number of planetary-scale pathways that exhibit large climatological aerosol transport, AARs contribute up to a maximum of 80 % to the total annual transport, depending on the species of aerosols. Dust (DU) AARs are more frequent in boreal spring, sea salt AARs are often more frequent during the boreal winter (summer) in the Northern (Southern) Hemisphere, carbonaceous (CA) AARs are more frequent during dry seasons, and often originate from the global rainforests and industrial areas, and sulfate AARs are present in the Northern Hemisphere during all seasons. For most aerosol types, the mass mixing ratio within AARs is highest near the surface. However, DU and CA AARs over or near the African continent exhibit peaks in their aerosol mixing ratio profiles around 700 hPa. AAR event characteristics are mostly independent of species with the mean length, width, and length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> width ratio around 4000 km, 600 km, and 7–8, respectively.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e147">As an important component of atmospheric composition, aerosols have considerable impacts on the convective lifetime and precipitation (Chakraborty et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2016; Stevens and Feingold, 2009; Rosenfeld et al., 2008; Andreae and Rosenfeld, 2008; Rosenfeld et al., 2016,
2014; Seinfeld et al., 2016; Rosenfeld et al., 2013) of convection, the radiation budget via direct and indirect effects (Chylek and Wong, 1995; Kim
and Ramanathan, 2008; Huang et al., 2006; Lohmann and Feichter, 2001;
Takemura et al., 2005), and the hydrological cycle (Chakraborty et al., 2018; Rosenfeld et al., 2008). In particular, their interactions with cloud microphysics and radiative forcing remain highly uncertain, constituting a
large uncertainty in the assessment of climate radiative forcing (IPCC, 2013). Aerosols can also influence a plant's photosynthesis. Aerosols are known to increase the amount of diffuse radiation (Xi and Sokolik, 2012). The implications for plants are that, along with decreasing the direct beam photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), the presence of aerosols would lead to greater diffused PAR, which means the illumination of a greater portion of plant canopies, including shaded leaves, for which direct PAR was
not accessible previously (Niyogi et al., 2004; Knohl and Baldocchi, 2008; Gu et al., 2003). Moreover, aerosols degrade the air quality and visibility, thus posing direct and negative impacts on human health (Gupta and  Christopher, 2009; Martin, 2008; Wang and Christopher, 2003; Li et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e150">With the advent of satellites capable of providing global-scale observations, it has become clear that aerosol loading in the atmosphere is not limited to regions just near their emission sources but are also transported across continental areas and large expanses of the ocean – emphasizing a  source–receptor relationship among these impacts of aerosols. In addition, in situ measurements have been conducted to detect aerosol transport events over various regions of the world, even in the remote polar regions (Gohm et al., 2009; Tomasi et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2011; Rajeev et al., 2000;  Bertschi et al., 2004; Qin et al., 2016; Ackermann et al., 1995; Fast et al., 2014). Many studies have previously investigated the long-range aerosol transport events between various regions of the world (Prospero, 1999; Sciare et al., 2008; Abdalmogith and Harrison, 2005; Swap et al., 1996; Kindap et al., 2006; Weinzierl et al., 2017), including inter-continental transport events. Many regions have been studied, including the transport events from the Sahara desert to the United States (Prospero, 1999), Europe to Istanbul (Kindap et al., 2006b), East Asia to California (Fan et al., 2014), and South Africa to the South Atlantic region (Swap et al., 1996). Many other studies have investigated aerosol aging and chemical processes during the transport events (Febo et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2009; Mori et al., 2003; Markowicz et al., 2016; Song and Carmichael, 1999), including the secondary organic aerosol formation, and depicted the
impact of the long-range aerosol transport on clouds (Z. Wang et al., 2020;
Garrett and Hobbs, 1995), precipitation  (Fan et al., 2014), radiation (Ramanathan et al., 2007), and air quality events, including the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> level (Han et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2014; Prospero et al., 2001; Febo et al., 2010). Apart from the studies using satellite and in situ measurements, climate models have often been used to understand aerosol transport (Takemura et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2014; Ackermann et al., 1995; Fast et al., 2014). As mentioned above, many of these studies used different approaches and methodologies, and thus, comparing one region to the another around the globe or depicting one species' character of extreme events to another species with a common  framework is difficult. Although these studies identify aerosol transport events across the globe, a clear picture about the identification of the extreme aerosol transport events (see Sect. 3), using long-term climatological observational datasets, their climatology and major transport pathways and the fractional contribution of those extreme transport events to the global annual transport were lacking.</p>
      <p id="d1e162">Leveraging the concept of atmospheric rivers (ARs; Ralph et al., 2020; Zhu
and Newell, 1994) and a widely used global AR detection algorithm (Guan and
Waliser, 2019, 2015; Guan et al., 2018), our previous study developed an
aerosol atmospheric rivers (AARs) detection algorithm (Chakraborty et al., 2021a). As with ARs that were studied around the globe using different
algorithms in different places, including global change studies, it was hard
to generate a consistent assessment based on one homogeneous method of identifying the transport events. A value of this study comes from the extension of a well-developed algorithm and applied uniformly around the
globe and across species. That study applied the new AAR detection algorithm
to five primary aerosol species represented in the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), reanalysis, for
dust (DU), sulfate (SU), sea salt (SS), and organic and black carbon (CA), and showed that aerosols can be transported long distances by AARs, i.e., narrow and elongated channels of very high values of vertically integrated aerosol transport. It should be noted that aerosol transport and the fractional contribution from AARs is detected over certain regions or the
major transport pathways of the globe. For example, with the exception of SS aerosols, AARs of other species are not detected over the tropical equatorial regions and especially not over the oceans. Moreover, it was found that, along major transport pathways, AARs are detected about  20–30 d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and can be responsible for up to a maximum of 40 %–80 %, depending on the species of aerosols of the total annual aerosol transport (Fig. 3; Chakraborty et al., 2021a). That study also illustrated that AAR events can have profound impacts on local air quality conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e177">Owing to the relatively large contribution AARs have on the total annual
aerosol transport in many regions across the world, and the impacts that
AARs can have on regional air quality conditions, it is important to further
investigate and quantify the roles AARs play within the climate system and
the impacts they have on air quality. For example, our previous study did
not characterize and show the vertical profiles of aerosol mass flux and
wind of AARs for each aerosol species. However, such information is crucial
for improving the understanding of the impacts of aerosols on the global
radiative budget, since multiple studies have revealed that the aerosols'
radiative impact depends on the aerosol composition and their vertical
distribution (Keil and Haywood, 2003; McComiskey and Feingold, 2008; Satheesh and Ramanathan, 2000; Mishra et al., 2015). With that motivation in mind, the current study explores the AAR concept further, characterizing and quantifying additional important features of AARs that were not provided in
Chakraborty et al. (2021a). These include (1) characteristics of individual
AARs such as the length, width, length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> width ratio, transport strength, and dominant transport direction, (2) seasonal variations, (3) relationship to the spatial distribution of surface emissions, (4) vertical profiles of wind, aerosol mixing ratio, and aerosol mass fluxes, and (5) the major
planetary-scale aerosol transport pathways to which AARs contribute. As with
Chakraborty et al. (2021a), we carry out this analysis utilizing the
MERRA-2 reanalysis during 1997–2014 and for all five aerosol species
represented, i.e., DU, SS, SU, black carbon (BC), and organic carbon (OC); the latter two are combined into carbonaceous aerosols (CAs) in Figs. 1 and 2 (Buchard et al., 2017; Gelaro
et al., 2017; Randles et al., 2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e190">MERRA-2 vertically integrated aerosol transport (IAT; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in four seasons (DJF, December–February; MAM, March–May; JJA, June–August; SON, September–November) during 1997–2014.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e239">Annual surface emission (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <bold>(a)</bold> DU, <bold>(b)</bold> SS, <bold>(c)</bold> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(d)</bold> CA (BC plus OC) aerosol species during 1997–2014 from MERRA-2 data.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d1e302">For this study, we use the MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis (GMAO, 2015a) that has a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.625</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a temporal resolution of 1 h  (Randles et al., 2017). In particular, most of the analysis is based on the zonal and meridional components of the vertically integrated aerosol mass flux data. The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis data capture the global aerosol optical depth reasonably well and are validated against 793 Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) stations' aerosol measurements (Gueymard and Yang, 2020). For example, we have used the variables dust mass flux in the zonal (DUFLUXU) and meridional (DUFLUXV) directions to compute integrated aerosol transport (IAT) values for dust at each grid. MERRA-2 aerosol data have previously been used in studies investigating aerosol microphysical effect and global aerosol transport (Xu et al., 2020; Sitnov et al., 2020; Chakraborty et al., 2021a). Our previous study using MERRA-2 data successfully detected AARs over various regions of the globe, and the AERONET stations located either in the receptor regions or along the path of AARs have shown a substantial increase in the aerosol optical thickness during AAR events (Chakraborty et al., 2021a).</p>
      <p id="d1e325">To examine the vertical profiles of aerosol amount and wind and aerosol mass
fluxes (i.e., Fig. 4), we use MERRA-2 3 h instantaneous aerosol mixing ratio data (inst3_3d_aer_Nv) that provide aerosol mass mixing ratio at 72 vertical levels. To assess the information about the zonal and meridional wind, we use MERRA-2's associated meteorological fields (inst3_3d_asm_Nv) with the same resolution as the aerosol mass mixing ratio data (Randles et al., 2017). In addition, we also use MERRA-2 time-averaged, single-level assimilated aerosol diagnostics (GMAO, 2015b) datasets (MERRA-2 tavgU_2d_adg_Nx) to describe the spatial
distribution of the emissions of aerosol particles at the surface to examine the relationship between source regions and frequency of occurrence of AARs. MERRA-2 accounts various sources for emissions (Randles et al., 2017). Dust emissions in MERRA-2 use a map of potential dust source locations. Emissions of both DU and SS are wind driven for each size bin and parameterized. Sea
salt emission is estimated using the sea surface temperature and the wind
speed dependency, with sea salt emission parameterization depending on the
friction velocity. For SS, lake emissions are also considered. SU aerosol
emissions derive from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Inventories
for sulfate include volcanic sulfur dioxide (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) emissions and those from the aircraft, energy sectors, and anthropogenic aerosol sources. Emissions of CA and SU aerosols in MERRA-2 come from various inventories
over the time. From 2010, the Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED) version 2.4-r6 is used. Locations of fires are obtained from  Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) level 2 fire and geolocation products. (Please see Table 1 of Randles et al., 2017 for details.) Before that, MERRA-2 utilizes the Global Fire Emission Dataset (GFED) from MODIS. MERRA-2 also applies biome-dependent correction factors and fractional contributions of emissions from different forests, applying corrections to the monthly mean emissions that cover 1980–1996 which are based on Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), the Along Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR), and the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) aerosol index.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methodology</title>
      <p id="d1e346">The AR detection algorithm designed by Guan and Waliser (2015) was to
detect and study ARs based on a combination of criteria related to the
intensity, direction, and geometry of vertically integrated water vapor
transport (IVT). The algorithm and associated AR detection databases (based
on multiple reanalysis products) have been widely used by the AR research
community (Chapman et al., 2019; Dhana Laskhmi and Satyanarayana, 2020;
Edwards et al., 2020; Gibson et al., 2020; Guan et al., 2020; Guan and
Waliser, 2019; Huning et al., 2019; Jennrich et al., 2020; Nash and
Carvalho, 2020; Sharma and Déry, 2020; Z. Wang et al., 2020; Zhou and Kim,
2019). Details about the AAR algorithm and the modifications made to the AR
algorithm to make it applicable for AARs are provided below.</p>
      <p id="d1e349">In the initial AAR algorithm (Chakraborty et al., 2021a), we detect AARs
daily at four time steps (00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00 UTC) for a period of 18 years during 1997–2014 and separately for each aerosol species. To compute total IAT over each grid cell at each time step for any species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of aerosols, we calculate the following:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M14" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>IAT</mml:mtext><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mroot><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IATU</mml:mtext><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IATV</mml:mtext><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mroot><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where IATU and IATV denote the vertically integrated aerosol mass flux in
the zonal and meridional directions, respectively. We are interested in
identifying extreme transport events; thus, we first compute the 85th percentile of the IAT magnitude over each grid cell during 1997–2014. Grid
cells with an IAT magnitude of less than the 85th percentile threshold are
discarded. The remaining grid cells serve as input to the following five
steps to (1) isolate the objects (i.e., contiguous areas) of enhanced IAT with values above the 85th percentile, (2) check the consistency of the IAT
directions at each grid cell within an IAT object to retain only those
objects where at least 50 % of the grid cells have IAT directions within 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the direction of the mean IAT of the entire object, (3) retain the stronger 50 % of those objects detected in the previous step based on the object mean IAT, (4) retain objectives only if the direction of the object mean IAT is within 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the along-river axis to ensure that the direction of the aerosol transport is aligned with the river, and (5) apply length and length-to-width ratio criteria and retain only those objects longer than 2000 km with an aspect ratio greater than 2. At the end of these steps, the objects that remain are referred to as AARs and are further characterized in this study. We also show the sensitivity of the detection of AARs to key threshold values used in the above steps in Fig. 9.</p>
      <p id="d1e413">In developing the AAR detection algorithm (Chakraborty et al., 2021a), only
three changes were made to the original AR detection algorithm. In step 1 of
the AR moisture algorithm, a fixed lower limit of IVT, specifically 100 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, is applied globally to facilitate the detection of ARs in polar regions, where IVT is extremely weak climatologically due to the very cold, dry atmosphere. We found that this additional filter is not needed for AAR detection. In addition, given the strong meridional moisture gradient between the tropics and extratropics, ARs are primarily recognized as the dominant means to transport water vapor poleward (Zhu and Newell, 1998). Accordingly, the AR algorithm is designed to detect IVT objects with notable transport in the poleward direction. However, since there is no similar and dominant planetary gradient in aerosol concentration in the north–south direction, we removed this constraint on meridional IAT for AARs and instead applied a constraint on the total IAT (i.e., zonal and meridional components combined). Finally, Chakraborty et al. (2021a) computed the climatological 85th percentile threshold IAT values for each month based on the 5 months centered on that month, as in the original AR algorithm (Guan and Waliser, 2015). However, it was found that a 3-month window better resolves the annual cycle of IAT and, meanwhile, still retains sufficient sampling over the period of 1997–2014. For example, the IAT 85th percentile for February is calculated using the IAT values 4 times each day during
January–March of 1997–2014.</p>
      <p id="d1e440">AAR frequency at each grid cell is calculated as a percent of the time steps that AARs are detected at that grid cell and expressed in units of days per year for annual means (by multiplying the percentage by 365 d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and days per season for seasonal means (by multiplying the percentage by 91 d per season). The mean zonal and meridional IAT associated with AARs over each grid cell at latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and longitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M22" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Mean</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>IATU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IATU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>and</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>Mean</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>IATV</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IATV</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of times AARs were detected over that grid cell.</p>
      <p id="d1e581">To obtain the fraction of total (i.e., regardless of AAR or non-AAR) annual
transport conducted by AARs of five different aerosol species, we first
temporally integrate IATU and IATV over all the time steps when AARs were
detected over a grid cell at latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and longitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as follows:<?xmltex \setcounter{equation}{0}?>

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" specific-use="gather" content-type="subnumberedsingle"><mml:math id="M26" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1.2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1a</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>Total</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>IATU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IATU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1.3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1b</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>Total</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>IATV</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IATV</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the duration between each time step (6 h), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total duration for 18 years. Based on that, the magnitude of annual AAR IAT, which is a scalar quantity, at each grid cell is calculated as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex3"><mml:math id="M29" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Total_AAR_annual_IAT</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mroot><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Total IATU</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Total IATV</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mroot><mml:mfenced close="" open="/"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e791">Similarly, we compute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Total_all_annual_IAT</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all the time steps (i.e., AAR and non-AAR combined). Next, since the annual AAR IAT and annual total IAT are not expected to be in exactly the same direction, we project the former onto the latter. For that, the directions of the two vectors are obtained as follows:<?xmltex \setcounter{equation}{1}?>

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" specific-use="gather" content-type="subnumberedsingle"><mml:math id="M31" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4.5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2a</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">All</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Total IATU</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Total IATV</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>for all events</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4.6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2b</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Total IATU</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Total IATV</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>for AAR events</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Finally, the fraction of total annual transport conducted by AARs is
obtained as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex4"><mml:math id="M32" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Frac</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Total_AAR_annual_IAT</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Total_all_annual_IAT</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">All</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Overall aerosol transport and surface emission</title>
      <p id="d1e1040">To provide a background for characterizing the seasonality of AARs, we first illustrate the seasonal variability in the overall aerosol transport (i.e., regardless of AAR conditions) during 1997–2014 (Fig. 1). Here, we combine black carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC) aerosols, denoted as CA, owing to their similar sources and seasonality (BC and OC are accounted for separately in subsequent analysis of AARs). Dust IAT (first column; Fig. 1) is higher during the MAM and JJA seasons. Global deserts, such as the Sahara, Gobi, and Taklamakan deserts, and the Middle East act as a significant source of dust aerosols year round (Fig. 2a), emitting more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of dust, primarily in the northern spring. The sea salt IAT (second column; Fig. 1) increases during the winter seasons of the Northern and Southern hemispheres due to the increased mean westerly flow and storm activities during these seasons. Annual maps of SS emission (Fig. 2b) show that a large number of SS aerosols are emitted over the global oceans, especially over the tropical oceans because of the convective activities, and in the midlatitudes where synoptic storm activities are dominant. Sulfate IAT (SU; third column; Fig. 1) is high over a region between China and the North Pacific Ocean region, extending up to the western USA, during all seasons with the lowest SU IAT values in JJA. The large SU IAT values (Fig. 2c) are likely due to high emissions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over China (Dai et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2013) coupled with strongly varying synoptic flows. A secondary region of a higher amount of SU IAT is also detected between the eastern USA and the northwestern Atlantic Ocean, as a high amount of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is emitted east of the Rocky Mountains, particularly over the Ohio valley (Fig. 2c). Figure 2c also shows that some SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is emitted due to global shipping activities.</p>
      <p id="d1e1113">Globally, boreal and rainforests are the most significant contributors to
the CA aerosols (Fig. 2d). Accordingly, it appears that the Congo rainforest dominates the Amazon rainforest in terms of CA IAT (right column; Fig. 1).
The Amazon rainforest region has higher IAT during its dry and transition
seasons and lower IAT in the wet season. Similarly, the Congo rainforest
releases a high amount of CA aerosols during the dry season (JJA) and
another peak in the Sahel during DJF (Fig. 2d). An increase in dry period CA IAT might be due to the increased vegetative stress, forest fire, and agricultural burning over these two regions. However, it is interesting to note that the Congo rainforest also emits CA aerosols during the boreal autumn (SON) rainy season, which is the stronger of the two rainfall seasons in this region, but not during the MAM rainy season. In MAM, the tropical rainforests over eastern India, Myanmar, and southern China have higher CA IAT values. Emissions from the boreal forests appear to be less than that of the rainforests. Over most of the midlatitudes in the Northern Hemisphere, the emissions of CA aerosols (Fig. 2d; also IAT values in Fig. 1d) are less than that over the global rainforests and China in all four seasons (Fig. 1). As a result, although CA (OC and BC) AARs are more frequent over the  midlatitude region, and the mean IAT by those rivers is less than those AARs that originate from the global rainforests and China (Chakraborty et  al., 2021a). These results point out the existence of seasonality and variability in the overall aerosol emission and transport. As a result, we expect the frequency and intensity of AARs might also vary among different seasons in accordance with the distribution of surface emissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>AAR frequency and intensity</title>
      <p id="d1e1124">To illustrate the characteristics of individual AAR objects, Fig. 3 shows
examples of AARs of each species, including the location, shape, and
transport direction and magnitude. Also indicated in the figure is the
length and width of each illustrated AAR. Figure 3a shows all the DU AARs
detected on 25 June 2008 at 12:00 UTC. Many of those DU AARs are detected between the Sahara desert and the Caribbean, the Middle East region and Europe, over the central USA, and over the Patagonia region. Figure 3d shows details of one DU AAR (encircled in Fig. 3a) that extends from the western boundary of the Sahara desert to the southern USA and Caribbean and has IAT values greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The AAR is 8082 km long and 1158 km wide. Similarly, we show details of one SS AAR
(Fig. 3e) with a length of 5295 km and a width of 984 km (IAT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the Southern Ocean among other AARs detected on 19 January 2010 at 12:00 UTC (Fig. 2b). Unlike DU AARs, SS AARs are located mostly over the ocean (see also Fig. 4) and carry the extratropical AR signature. SS AARs over the tropical regions appear to be smaller than the extratropical AARs in Fig. 3b.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1216">Detection of five different species of aerosols atmospheric rivers. Panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold>, <bold>(g)</bold>, and <bold>(h)</bold> show all AARs detected for a given species at an arbitrary time step (see the bottom of each panel for the aerosol species and time stamp). Panels <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold>, <bold>(i)</bold>, and <bold>(j)</bold> show the detail (encircled; see the legend) of a specific AAR from the corresponding panel above.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1250">A number of SU AARs occurred in the polar region due to the Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption (Fig. 3c). The volcano, located in
Iceland, erupted on 20 March 2010, causing disruption to the
aviation industry (<uri>https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanic_ash/ash_clouds_air_routes_eyjafjallajokull.html</uri>, last access: 1 January 2022). In Fig. 3f, we show details of one of these SU AARs on 29 March 2010. The SU AAR is 6203 km long and 294 km wide and transported a large amount of SU aerosols (IAT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) into and across the polar region. It is important to notice that MERRA-2 did not include the ash aerosols that were co-emitted with the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plumes that were eventually converted into sulfate aerosols by gaseous and aqueous processes. In April 2010, our algorithm detected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SU AARs (at every 6 h of interval, i.e., 20 SU AAR days) originating over that region and propagating to different directions.</p>
      <p id="d1e1321">Hereinafter, we separately show the CA rivers as OC and BC rivers, especially because BC AARs can significantly impact the radiative forcing compared to OC AARs and because the mean mass of aerosols being transported by the OC is about 5 times that of BC AARs (Fig. 4). Figure 3g shows examples of OC AARs detected on 1 July 2013. We show details of one OC AAR that stretches from Madagascar to New Zealand in Fig. 3i. The OC AAR is 13078 km long and 730 km wide and flows west over the Indian Ocean with an IAT of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 3h shows a few BC AARs detected on 27 April 2009. BC AARs often originate near the  China–northwestern Pacific Ocean region (see also Fig. 4). We show the details of one such BC AAR in Fig. 3j. It is to be noted that the IAT values of BC AARs are smaller than the OC AARs; however, they might play a significant role in the atmospheric radiation budget owing to the capability of BC aerosols to absorb solar energy.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1370">Annual climatological AAR frequency (days per year; shading) and IAT (arrows; kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) during 1997–2014 based on MERRA-2. <bold>(a)</bold> Dust. <bold>(b)</bold> Sea salt. <bold>(c)</bold> Sulfate. <bold>(d)</bold> Organic carbon. <bold>(e)</bold> Black carbon. Scales for the IAT vectors are provided in the lower right side of each plot.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1419">To illustrate the overall climatology of AARs, Fig. 4 shows the annual
mean frequency of occurrence (shading; days per year) and the mean IAT
(arrows; kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) associated with AARs. Figure 4a shows that a
strong anticyclonic motion over the Sahara desert is associated with many DU
AARs, consistent with the annual DU emission (Fig. 2a) and seasonal DU IAT
(Fig. 1 – leftmost column) over that region. Around 30 AAR d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(shades) carry on average 3–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (vectors) of dust from the Sahara desert over the North Atlantic Ocean and reach the southern USA and the Caribbean regions. A similar number of AARs also transport aerosols towards Europe and the middle east region. A relatively high number of DU AARs are detected over China, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan; however, the mean transport over these regions by AARs is lower (IAT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than those originating from the Sahara desert. The southern hemispheric deserts also emit numerous
AARs but with a smaller amount of dust transport as the dust emissions (Fig. 2a) and IAT (Fig. 1) are low over there. Overall, the Sahara desert
dominates any other desert in the world regarding the formation of the
strongest and most intense DU AARs.</p>
      <p id="d1e1543">Figure 4b shows the climatological maps of SS AARs. SS AARs are mostly located over the global oceans, especially over the tropical and subtropical
trade wind regions. The SS AARs in the midlatitudes carry the signature of
the storm tracks and have distributions similar to ARs (Guan and Waliser,
2015). Every year, in the midlatitude region, 30–40 ARs are detected (Chakraborty et al., 2021a), whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AAR d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> occur
in the midlatitudes with mean a IAT of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The distributions between ARs and SS AARs are not quite the same; the SS AARs are biased equatorward toward the trade winds. In comparison, tropical SS AARs are more frequent but have less IAT than the midlatitude SS AARs. Around 30 SS AARs have mean IAT of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the tropical region.</p>
      <p id="d1e1657">It is important to note SU AARs are more frequent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 4c) in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern Hemisphere,  consistent with the predominance of emissions of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over China, Europe, and the eastern USA (Fig. 2c), owing to anthropogenic emissions and biogenic activities in these regions. It is important to note that MERRA-2 aerosols data do not account for biogenic sources like carbonyl sulfide in the version of the data we have used for this study. The SU AAR hotspot regions over the Southern Hemisphere include pathways from the southern edges of the global rainforests to the south Indian, south Atlantic, and Southern Oceans. Mean IAT (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) by SU AARs is lower than that of the DU and SS AARs. Many BC and OC AARs originate from the global rainforests, such as the Congo and Amazon, and from the regions that are susceptible to biomass burning and CA aerosol emissions, such as Europe, the eastern USA, industrialized areas over eastern China, and northern India. Annually, 20–40 BC or OC AARs are generated from these regions. It appears that BC AARs are more numerous than the OC AARs; however, OC AARs have larger IAT than BC AARs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Vertical profiles of AAR aerosol mass flux and wind</title>
      <p id="d1e1744">To understand the anomalous atmospheric conditions that account for an AAR
event, it is important to know the relative contribution of the two
quantities that make up these IAT extremes, namely the aerosol mixing ratio
and the wind speed. Also, as mentioned before, the altitude of aerosol
particles within AARs can be of importance due to aerosol impacts on the
radiation budget, convective anvil lifetime (Bister and Kulmala, 2011),
cloud formation (Froyd et al., 2009; Khain et al., 2008), and air quality
near the surface. Here, we characterize the vertical profiles of the AARs at
a number of different locations with high AAR frequency (see the inset map
in the middle column; based on Fig. 4). For example, the orange box over the
Saharan–Caribbean pathway experiences a presence of 25–30 AARs yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a). Based on our analysis between 1997 and 2014, the profiles in Fig. 5a, b, and c show the mean and standard deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–500 AARs.</p>
      <p id="d1e1766">It is important to keep in mind that the aerosol vertical structure in
MERRA-2 is not directly constrained by measurements and is chiefly
determined by the injection height of the emissions and turbulent and
convective transport processes parameterized in the model. Evaluation of the
vertical structure of MERRA-2 aerosols appears in Buchard et al. (2017).
Buchard et al. (2017) has used Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared
Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) to examine the vertical structure
of aerosols in MERRA-2. The left column of Fig. 5 shows the composite vertical profiles of aerosol mass fluxes for each aerosol species; both those for AARs (solid) and for all time steps regardless of AAR conditions (dotted)
are shown for comparison. Mean fluxes of the synoptic AAR events are larger
than the overall annual mean over all the regions, which is not unexpected since AARs represent the extreme transport events. For DU AARs (Fig. 5a), the strongest transport is observed between the Sahara desert and North Atlantic/Caribbean (orange) and western Europe/Middle East (red) pathways. Flux values decrease with altitude within AARs that transport aerosols from the Sahara desert to the Europe/Middle East region (red). However, AARs that transport aerosols from the Sahara desert to the North Atlantic region (orange) have peak IAT values near 750 hPa. There is also a secondary peak at the 960 hPa height (Fig. 5a). The aerosol mixing ratio (Fig. 5b) slightly decreases from the surface up to a height of 960 hPa and then increases above it. This might suggest the influence of the gravitational force and settlement on the aerosol mixing ratio, as observed in many of the aerosol mixing ratio profiles of other species over other regions (for example, the red line showing the aerosol mixing ratio profile for the Sahara to European
pathway). However, a smaller peak in the wind profile (Fig. 5c) around 950 hPa indicates the influences from the low-level jets and the seasonal
variations in the transatlantic dust transport that have not been studied yet. A detailed seasonal analysis is required to understand the existence of the smaller peak at 960 hPa. However, the presence of the African easterly
jet–north (AEJ-N) above, centering at 600–700 hPa, further lifts the aerosols and attains a peak around 750 hPa.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1771">Average vertical profiles of <bold>(a, d, g, j, m)</bold> aerosol mass fluxes, <bold>(b, e, h, k, n)</bold> aerosol mixing ratios, and <bold>(c, f, i, l, o)</bold> wind speed over a number of locations for AAR events (solid) and all (dotted) time steps. Please see the AAR frequency maps in the inset of the middle panel for the locations chosen to calculate the profiles. In panels <bold>(c, f, i, l, o)</bold>, a sign convention (see the column title) is used to highlight the general east–west direction of the wind speed profiles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1793">We also show the vertical aerosol mixing ratio profiles (middle column) and
the wind profiles (right column) separately to help disentangle their
influences on the aerosol flux profiles. Given the very few globally gridded
datasets to use for this purpose, we have relied on the data provided in the
MERRA-2 data, which in this case is provided as aerosol mixing ratio. Figure 5b shows that high aerosol levels inside AARs over the Sahara desert to Caribbean pathway extend vertically up to the 700 hPa height, with a peak around 750 hPa, unlike any other regions analyzed. The third column, which shows the mean wind speed profile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mroot><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mroot></mml:math></inline-formula> multiplied by the sign of the zonal wind to show the east–west direction of the AARs, confirms the influence from the AEJ-N (Cook, 1999; Wu et al., 2009) on the AARs wind profile that peaks around 650 hPa and lifts aerosols over this region (Fig. 4c). Higher flux values near the surface are due to a high aerosol mixing ratio, but as altitude increases, higher flux values inside AARs are contributed by both the aerosol lifting and the high zonal wind speed of AEJ-N between the Sahara desert and the North Atlantic Ocean region. Other regions like the Southern Ocean (near South America), Australia, eastern China, and western USA have a smaller aerosol mixing ratio as compared to the Sahara to the North Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean and Sahara to Europe/Middle East pathways. Wind speed contributes to larger flux values as altitude increases over some of these locations near eastern China, the Southern Ocean, Australia, and the western USA; however, their flux values are smaller than those taking off the Sahara desert.</p>
      <p id="d1e1817">Aerosol flux and mass mixing ratio profiles for SS species (Fig. 5d and e)
decrease with altitude. This is because the SS particles are typically
found within the boundary layer (Gross and Baklanov, 2007), are larger in
size, and often form due to high wind speed and surface evaporation along
the storm tracks and may not travel long distances outside the storm tracks
(Sofiev et al., 2011; May et al., 2016). The largest aerosol mixing ratio
and IAT values are observed over the Southern Ocean consistent with the
persistent and year-round AAR activities over there.</p>
      <p id="d1e1820">Consistent with the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission (Fig. 2c), eastern China (blue line)
dominates in terms of SU aerosol mass mixing ratio by a factor of 5 as
compared to the other regions (Fig. 5h) analyzed and shown here. The aerosol
mixing ratio (Fig. 5h) and the flux values (Fig. 5g) increase with height,
attaining a peak around 900 hPa over there, and probably exhibit the impact of the boundary layer inversion effect on the accumulation of the pollutants
(Li et al., 2017). Above 900 hPa, both the aerosol mass mixing ratio and
flux values gradually decrease. However, the SU aerosol mass mixing ratio decreases when those AARs reach the western USA five times (Fig. 5h). Owing
to the fact that the eastern USA originates many SU AARs that can contribute
to a transatlantic transport driven by strong westerly winds, we have also
computed the IAT profiles of SU AARs generated over there. Figure 5g and h
show that AARs over the eastern USA also have a high IAT (Fig. 5g) and
aerosol mass mixing ratio (Fig. 5h). Flux profiles and aerosols mixing ratio
over the Indian Ocean (red) and Southern Ocean (green) show different
behavior. Aerosols appear to be continental in origin and are lifted to
attain a peak concentration around 650 hPa. Contributions from wind speed
(Fig. 5i) as compared to aerosol mixing ratio (Fig. 5h) appear to be less
on the SU flux profiles (Fig. 5g) since the wind speed associated with AARs
is the highest over the Indian and Southern oceans, but the largest flux
values are associated with the AARs over the eastern China region which has
the largest aerosol mass mixing ratio.</p>
      <p id="d1e1832">Next, we examine the vertical profiles of CA AARs over the Congo Basin, the
western USA, eastern China, the Indian Ocean, and the Southern Ocean. As
in the case of dust aerosols over the Sahara desert to North Atlantic
transport pathway (Fig. 5a; orange line), both the OC and BC AARs off the
Congo Basin show elevated flux values around 700 hPa (Fig. 5j and m). It
is to be noted that the wind speed within AARs peaks around 650 hPa,
suggesting the influence from the AEJ-S (south; Adebiyi and Zuidema, 2016;
Chakraborty et al., 2021b; Das et al., 2017) on the AARs' wind profile
(Fig. 7k and n) that might be responsible for the peaks in the aerosol
mixing ratio profiles around 750 hPa (Fig. 5l and o) instead of the
exponential profiles as observed in most of other regions. AARs over eastern
China (blue) also carry a large number of near-surface aerosol particles
that contribute to large BC and OC IAT values in this region. However, when
those AARs reach the western USA, the number of the BC and OC aerosol mass mixing ratio significantly decreases by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times, presumably because of the settlement and removal of the aerosol particles during the transport.
As compared to SU AARs, the IAT values and aerosol mass mixing ratio of OC
and BC AARs over the eastern USA is significantly lower (3–4 times less) than
those originating from China and the Congo rainforest. Wind speed appears to
have less influence on the flux profiles since the Indian Ocean and the
Southern Ocean have the largest (smallest) wind speed (flux values)
associated with the AARs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Fraction of total annual transport accounted for by AARs</title>
      <p id="d1e1853">It is apparent from Fig. 5 that the mean IAT averaged over AAR time steps
is greater than the mean IAT averaged from all time steps. This is not
surprising, since AARs detected by our algorithm represent the extreme
transport events (see Sect. 2 for the definition and methodology). Considering that the original analysis on water vapor ARs (Zhu and Newell, 1998) highlighted that 90 % of the poleward transport of water vapor in the midlatitudes occurred in a relatively small number of extreme transport
events (i.e., ARs), a similar question can be raised here for AARs.
Specifically, what fraction of the total annual aerosol transport is
accounted for by the 20–40 AAR days that occur each year on average (Fig. 4)? Also, do AARs transport a higher fraction of the total global annual transport over the major aerosol transport pathways, and is this dependent on aerosol species? In Fig. 6, we show the fraction of total annual IAT accounted for by AARs (shades), counting only the component of AAR transport in the direction of the total annual transport (arrows). Figure 6a shows that, annually, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 000–100 000 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of DU IAT is transported by All events (i.e., considering all data points in the record)
that originate from the Sahara desert. Near the Equator, the fractional
transport by AARs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % over the Atlantic Ocean in the direction of the Amazon rainforest (Fig. 6a), which is realized within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AAR d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 4a). In this same longitude sector, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradually increases with latitude and reaches up to 80 % around 35–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, where AARs act to transport dust from the Sahara desert to Europe and the Middle East region. Over Mongolia and China, the total annual IAT is  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 000–40 000 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and about 30–40 AAR d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a) contribute up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %–50 % of that transport. In the Southern Hemisphere, Patagonia and South American drylands give rise to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of annual dust transport and AARs contribute to a maximum of 20 %–40 % of that transport in about 20–30 AAR events per year (Fig. 4a). Over some regions far from the dust source region, such as over the maritime continent, the annual IAT value is very small by all events (Fig. 6a). About 5 AARs (shading, Fig. 4a) with very small object mean IAT values (arrows, Fig. 4a) are observed over there each year. It appears that, although AARs are not frequent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AAR d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) over there, they are responsible for 80 %–100 % of the total annual transport.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2024">Fraction of annual total IAT transport (arrows; tonnes are shown in parentheses, followed by kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounted for by AARs (%; shading) of five different aerosol species.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2045">SS AARs are far more frequent over the oceans than over the land (Fig. 4b), with peak frequencies of about 30 AAR d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> occurring over the
subtropical trade wind regions, the Southern Ocean and northern Atlantic Ocean. In these regions, the total annual IAT is about 10 000–20 000 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 %–30 % in the subtropical regions, reaching a maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % over the Southern Ocean and the northern Atlantic Ocean (Fig. 6b).</p>
      <p id="d1e2101">AARs for other species of aerosols can contribute to a maximum of 40 % of
the total annual IAT over their major transport pathways. For example, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SU AAR d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> that originate over China (Fig. 4c) transport <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %–40 % of the total annual aerosol transport
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the northern Pacific Ocean. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with OC (BC) AARs reaches a maximum of 40 % (30 %) between the Congo Basin and the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Over China and the North Pacific Ocean, South Africa and the Southern/Indian oceans, south China and the western Pacific Ocean, and Amazon and the southern Atlantic/Southern oceans <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can reach up to a maximum of 40 %. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also observed, despite low total annual IAT, over the northern part of the Sahel region for both BC and OC AARs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>AAR seasonality</title>
      <p id="d1e2198">Figure 7 shows AAR frequency along with the direction and magnitude of the
mean AAR IAT during four different seasons. DU AARs (shading) originate
during all the seasons over the Sahara desert. DU AAR IAT (arrows) is higher
during DJF and MAM over the Sahara desert owing to a stronger anticyclonic motion in the boreal winter and spring. The largest number of DU AARs are generated during the MAM season when the DU IAT is the highest (Fig. 1) and widely spread across the Northern Hemisphere. In JJA and SON, DU AARs appear to have lower IAT (shorter arrows) but are more frequent than in the DJF season. The frequency of SS AARs also depends on the season. A higher number of SS AARs is detected over the eastern Pacific Ocean and the west coast of the USA, northern Atlantic Ocean, and Europe in DJF and MAM. In JJA, no SS AARs are detected over there. Over the Southern Ocean, SS AARs with large IAT are more frequent during austral winter or MAM and JJA. In comparison, tropical SS AARs are present year round.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2203">Seasonal variations in the AAR frequency (days per season) and
IAT (arrows) for five different species of aerosols.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2212">SU AARs in the Northern Hemisphere are more (less) frequent in MAM (JJA) and
can be related to the seasonal variations in IAT there (Fig. 1). The frequency of occurrences of SU AARs is higher during SON compared to DJF, while their IAT values are larger in DJF. This might be because of the
readiness of sulfate aerosols to form cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and their hygroscopic nature. The occurrences of intense AR-related precipitation in DJF over the extratropical region in the Northern Hemisphere might cause scavenging and wet removal of SU aerosols when the AARs and ARs coexist. A detailed investigation considering AR-AAR interactions is needed in future studies to better understand the coexistence and influence of AARs and ARs.</p>
      <p id="d1e2216">Over the Congo rainforest, several OC AARs occur during its dry season (also
when CA IAT is high; Fig. 1). A similar frequency of occurrences of OC AARs
is also observed during the dry season over the Amazon rainforest. Many OC
AARs occur east of China during the DJF and MAM season when the IAT values
are large over there (Fig. 1). Many BC and OC AARs are generated over the
global rainforests during their dry seasons.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Basic characteristics of individual AARs and algorithm
sensitivities</title>
      <p id="d1e2227">In this section, we characterize basic features of AARs (Fig. 8), including
those related to geometry and IAT intensity and directions, and discuss and
show the sensitivity of various AAR features to algorithm specifications and
thresholds (Fig. 9). Figure 8a shows that the frequency of AARs decreases
monotonically as AAR length increases for all aerosol species. The mean
lengths of DU, SS, SU, OC, and BC AARs are 4264, 3722, 4121, 4528, and 4378 km, respectively. Figure 8b shows that AAR widths exhibit a skewed distribution, unlike AAR lengths, implying an optimum or common value for AAR widths around 400 km. The mean width of DU, SS, SU, OC, and BC AARs is 586, 642, 542, 625, and 589 km, respectively. When considered together in the form of the aspect ratio of AARs, i.e., length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> width ratio, the distribution is also a skewed distribution (Fig. 8c). The lengths are typically 7–8 times their widths due to the skewness of the distribution. DU and SS AARs are the two species having the largest object mean IAT values (Fig. 8d). While, on average, DU AARs have IAT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, SU, OC, and BC AARs have smaller IAT (Fig. 8d). Average object mean IAT values for SU, OC, and BC AARs are 0.1, 0.1, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.016</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The frequency of object mean IAT for BC AARs decreases sharply and seldom reaches beyond <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. SU (OC) AARs attain a maximum object mean IAT values around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a maximum
frequency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2429">Histograms of characteristics of individual AARs. The star (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">⋆</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) symbols denote the mean. <bold>(a)</bold> Length. <bold>(b)</bold> Width. <bold>(c)</bold> Aspect ratio. <bold>(d)</bold> Magnitude of mean IAT. <bold>(e)</bold> Coherence of the IAT direction. <bold>(f)</bold> Direction of mean IAT.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2464">The coherence of IAT directions (Fig. 8e) is computed as a fraction of the
number of grid cells with IAT directed within 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the direction
of the object mean IAT to all the grid cells within that AAR. A large value
implies that a larger fraction of the grid cells has IAT directed in the
same overall direction as the AAR. AARs of all the species have a mean
coherence of IAT directions between 0.91 (DU) and 0.94 (SU). The distribution of the direction of the object mean IAT implies that the AARs are mostly directed in the zonal direction (Fig. 8f). Relative to north, peak frequencies near 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and between 250 and 310<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> imply that the AARs are either westerly or easterly in nature. A few westerly AARs also transport aerosols in the northeasterly (45–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and southeasterly (90–135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) directions. A wider peak between 250 and 310<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> implies that most of the easterly AARs also have meridional components in the southwesterly and northwesterly directions. The average values of the object mean IAT direction for all the species of AARs are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (westerly) and between 260 and 270<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (easterly). These results show that the AARs mostly transport aerosols in the zonal direction as compared to ARs that have notable transport of water vapor in the meridional direction (Guan and Waliser, 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e2550">Finally, Fig. 9 shows the sensitivity of AAR detection in our algorithm to
three primary thresholds that define the geometry (length and aspect ratio)
and grid-wise IAT limits (to identify the extreme transport) of AARs. The
results presented above in this study are based on a length limit of 2000 km, aspect ratio limit of 2, and a pixel-wise IAT limit of the 85th
percentile. Keeping the length and aspect ratio limits fixed, while increasing the IAT limit to the 90th and 95th percentile values, yields a lower number of AARs detected (top row). On the other hand, relaxing the length limit to 1750 and 1500 km greatly increases the number of AARs detected (middle row). Relaxing the aspect ratio limit to 1.5 and 1 does not
significantly alter the number of AARs detected, suggesting that the other
limits applied (such as length greater than 2000 km) already effectively
remove IAT objects that are not elongated. It appears, from Fig. 9, that
grid-wise IAT thresholds pose a large sensitivity to AARs detection as the
number of AARs detected is reduced roughly by half as we increase that
threshold to the 95th percentile from the 85th percentile used in our main analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2555">Sensitivity of AAR detection to threshold values used for
three key parameters (corresponding to the three columns; see the legend for the parameter being tested and the three values chosen for each test parameter) in the detection algorithm for five aerosol species (corresponding to the five rows; see the panel title for the aerosol species). Shown are histograms of mean IAT of individual AARs detected. For example, the left column shows results based on perturbing the IAT percentile threshold (85th, 90th, and 95th percentiles), while keeping the length (2000 km) and aspect ratio (2) thresholds unchanged from the main analysis presented earlier.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2564">Figure 10 shows the sensitivity of the average global area coverage of all
AARs to AAR algorithm parameters. Each bar represents the area-weighted
global mean AAR frequency or a spatiotemporal measure of the amount of
time/space that there is an AAR. Annually, AARs cover 3.42 % of the
global area, respectively. Relaxing the length limits to 1750(1500) km
increases the number of detections of AARs; thus, the areal coverage of AARs
increases to 3.56 % (3.76 %). On the other hand, increasing the
pixel-wise IAT limit to 90th and 95th percentile reduces the areal
coverage to 2.44 % and 1.13 %, respectively. Relaxing the aspect ratio does not have any impact on AAR's areal coverage. ARs, on the other hand, account for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % more of the Earth's surface area than AARs
(not shown), likely because the filter based on object mean IVT direction in
the AR algorithm preferentially filtered out smaller objects compared to the
revised filter in the AAR algorithm based on IAT magnitude.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2579">AAR and AR sensitivity of the global area coverage to threshold values used for three key parameters in the detection algorithm. For each species of AARs, the first bar shows the average global area coverage for the length limit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, aspect ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the pixel-wise IAT threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. The next two bars show the areal coverage after relaxing the length limit to 1750 and 1500 km. The fourth and the fifth bars show the areal coverage after increasing the pixel-wise IAT limit to 90th and 95th percentile. The last two bars show the areal coverage after relaxing the aspect ratio to 1.5 and 1. Standard deviations show the variations in areal coverage by different species.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/8175/2022/acp-22-8175-2022-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2627">Using a newly developed AAR algorithm (Chakraborty et al., 2021a) based on the widely used AR detection algorithm (Guan and Waliser, 2015), we examine a number of important details about AARs that were not explored in Chakraborty et al. (2021a). This includes AAR seasonal variations in frequency and transport values (Fig. 7), the fraction of total annual aerosol transport account for by AARs (Fig. 6), a characterization of their vertical profiles (Fig. 5), relation to the pattern of surface emissions (Fig. 2), along with a number of basic characteristics and distributions for quantities such as AAR length, aspect ratio, object mean IAT, the coherence of the direction of IAT (Fig. 8), and sensitivities of the algorithm to the thresholds chosen for three key parameters (Fig. 9). This study is the first to provide a common detection and analytical basis for studying extreme transport events, heavily leveraging the heritage and methodologies by the (water vapor) atmospheric river community. Moreover, this study identifies the extreme transport events by selecting grid cells with IAT values greater than the 85th percentile of their climatological values and retaining the stronger 50 % of those objects detected based on the object mean IAT values. This study creates a database of the AAR events between 1997 and 2014 that will be expanded till 2020 and will provide a valuable platform for aerosol-transport-related research, including their impacts on the climate and air quality. Furthermore, the algorithm developed to detect AARs can be used to detect the real-time AAR events using the nature run of the GOES FP (forward processing) system that provides analyses and forecasts produced in real time, using the most recent validated GEOS system (<uri>https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/GMAO_products/NRT_products.php</uri>, last access: 13 June 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e2633">The global total annual transport by all and AAR events are inhomogeneous in
terms of their geographic distributions. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies between 0 % and 40 % for SU, OC, and BC AARs, between 0 % and 80 % for DU AARs, and between 0 % and 50 % for SS AARs over various regions of the world. Our results show that, on average, 30–40 SU, BC, and OC AAR days every year are responsible for a maximum of 30 %–40 % of total annual aerosol transport for a given aerosol species over certain major transport pathways around the globe. Over the major transport pathways of the SS (DU) AARs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can reach up to a maximum of 50(80) % of the total annual aerosol transport of the respective species. The inhomogeneous nature of AARs' spatial distribution and fractional transport out of the annual total suggest a plausible impact of the AARs on the meridional temperature gradient. The attenuation of solar energy by AARs might impact the surface temperature and can thus alter the meridional temperature gradient and the thermal winds. Further analysis will be conducted in the future to delineate the impacts of AARs on the global weather and climate.</p>
      <p id="d1e2658">The major transport pathways by AARs are also identified in our algorithm
for each of the aerosol species. The source of AARs is consistent with the
major aerosol emission regions of the world. DU aerosols mostly originate from the global deserts, and their frequency is higher during boreal autumn and spring. SS AARs are mostly located over the global oceans and carry the footprint of the storms. In the midlatitudes, their frequency and intensity increase during the boreal (austral) winter in the Northern (Southern) Hemisphere. Tropical SS AARs are more frequent, but their magnitude of aerosol transport and contribution to the annual aerosol transport is less. A further investigation is needed to understand if/how tropical cyclones and midlatitude storms impact SS AARs differently. CA AARs are generated over the region where biomass burning is more common, like India and China. CA AARs that originate from the global boreal and tropical rainforests have the highest frequency and intensity during their dry seasons but are mostly absent or exist with a reduced frequency during their wet seasons. SU AARs are present year around in the Northern Hemisphere, with a peak frequency and intensity during the dry periods of boreal spring (MAM) and autumn (SON). The frequency of SU AARs occurrences reduces during the boreal summer and winter, presumably due to the summertime convective precipitation events and wintertime synoptic storms. Overall, regions with frequent AAR activities include the Sahara desert to Caribbean and Europe for DU AARs, a circumpolar transport around the midlatitude region in the Northern Hemisphere for all but SS AARs, global oceans and midlatitude storm tracks over the global ocean for SS AARs, global rainforests for BC and OC AARs, and from South America and Africa to the Southern Ocean for DU, BC, OC, and SU AARs.</p>
      <p id="d1e2661">We have also examined the vertical structure of the aerosol mixing ratio and
wind inside AARs. Over most of the major pathways, the aerosol mixing ratio and flux values decrease with height. A higher aerosol mass mixing ratio inside AARs is observed below the 700 hPa over most of the regions and, thus, may have a strong implication on the low cloud cover and surface irradiance. Such an interaction can be complex since shallow clouds also have cooling effects as most of the aerosol species do. Understanding such an interaction between shallow clouds and AARs and their impacts on the cooling effect warrants further investigation. The aerosol mixing ratio (wind speed) appears to contribute a large fraction of IAT below (above) 700 hPa. However, AARs generated from the African continent are the exceptions. Signatures of AEJ-N on DU AARs taking off the Sahara desert and AEJ-S on BC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC AARs originating from the Congo Basin are observed. Both the aerosol mixing ratio and wind speed appear to peak around 600–700 hPa, leading to a higher IAT at the level. The fact that aerosols lift up and attain a peak mass flux around the 700 hPa height for AARs generated from the African continent might have a strong influence on the wet season onset and rainfall mechanisms over there (Chakraborty et al., 2021b). We  acknowledge a source of uncertainty in the aerosol mass mixing ratio and IAT profiles shown in this study from the MERRA-2 data, since the MERRA-2 aerosol vertical distribution is also not constrained by satellite-based lidar observations. A recent study found that comparison to the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation vertical feature mask (CALIPSO VFM) data detects a greater occurrence of DU aerosols in MERRA-2 due to errors in the MERRAero aerosol speciation (Nowottnick et al., 2015). In a future study, an in-depth analysis will be performed using the observation from the ground-based and airborne measurements (wherever available) and CALIPSO. For example, the ORACLES mission and CALIPSO can be used to study the subsidence that depresses the plumes once they reach the Atlantic Ocean off the West African Coast (Das et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e2672">AAR frequency of occurrence decreases monotonically with its length with the
mean around 4000 km. However, AAR width and aspect ratio show a skewed
distribution. AAR length is, on average, 6–8 times the width. DU and SS AARs
carry a larger amount of aerosol mass as compared to SU, OC, and BC
aerosols. More than 90 % of all the grid cells within an individual AAR
have IAT directed in the same overall direction of the AAR, showing that the
transport occurring inside an individual AAR is largely coherent in the
direction. AARs are mostly oriented in the zonal direction. A peak frequency
of the direction of object mean IAT is observed between 45 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">135</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (westerly AARs) or 225 and 315<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (easterly AARs). Large mean width and length (Fig. 8a and b) of AARs imply that AARs have a significant amount of areal cover. AARs also transport a higher aerosol mass mixing ratio, located mostly in the lower troposphere, to regions far from their sources – often intercontinental – for 20–40 d yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on average. Our findings, thus, indicate the necessity of exploring the impacts of AARs on human health since smoke and dust particles and the secondary aerosol particles that can be generated over the AAR lifetime might have a huge impact on human health, especially on lungs. The algorithm shows little to no sensitivity to the aspect ratio limit chosen, but notable influence of the length limit, and strongest influence of the IAT percentile limit on the detection result.</p>
      <p id="d1e2714">This study points out the necessity for analyzing and investigating the impact of AARs on climate and air quality. The fact that AARs can carry a greater number of aerosol particles through a narrow pathway and can probably
contain more aerosol particles than a moderate–high aerosol optical depth (AOD) region suggests that
their impact on radiative forcing and cloud microphysics can be stronger
than that what has been reported and investigated so far in the literature. We have not addressed the role of climate modulation on AAR activity and
characteristics. Events like El Niño, La Niña, the Pacific Decadal
Oscillation, the North Atlantic Subtropical High, and the Madden–Julian oscillations can have a significant influence on AARs and will be addressed in future studies. A further investigation is needed on the AR and AAR interaction and how ARs and cyclonic activities modulate AARs in the midlatitude during the winter season of each hemisphere.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2721">All satellite data used in this study can be downloaded from the EOSDIS Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs) at <uri>https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/daacs</uri> (last access: 13 June 2022, NASA, 2022). References to the datasets have been provided in Sect. 2. Please contact the corresponding author for any questions about how to download the data that are publicly available and codes written in IDL and Python. The AAR database can be obtained from the Global Atmospheric Rivers Dataverse (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25346/S6/CXO9PD" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25346/S6/CXO9PD</ext-link>, Chakraborty, 2022). Development of the AAR database was supported by NASA. The AAR code is available from Bin Guan (bin.guan@jpl.nasa.gov) on request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2733">SC, BG, DEW, and AMdS designed the research and wrote the paper. SC analyzed the data.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2739">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e2745">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2751">This work has been supported by the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration. The contribution of Sudip Chakraborty and Duane E. Waliser  was carried out on behalf of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2757">This paper was edited by Michael Schulz and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abdalmogith, S. S. and Harrison, R. M.: The use of trajectory cluster analysis to examine the long-range transport of secondary inorganic aerosol in the UK, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6686–6695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.059</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ackermann, I. J., Hass, H., Memmesheimer, M., Ziegenbein, C., and Ebel, A.:
The parametrization of the sulfate-nitrate-ammonia aerosol system in the
long-range transport model EURAD, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 57, 101–114, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Adebiyi, A. A. and Zuidema, P.: The role of the southern African easterly
jet in modifying the southeast Atlantic aerosol and cloud environments, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1574–1589, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2765</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions.
Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bertschi, I. T., Jaffe, D. A., Jaeglé, L., Price, H. U., and Dennison,
J. B.: PHOBEA/ITCT 2002 airborne observations of transpacific transport of
ozone, CO, volatile organic compounds, and aerosols to the northeast
Pacific: Impacts of Asian anthropogenic and Siberian boreal fire emissions,
J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23S12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004328</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bister, M. and Kulmala, M.: Anthropogenic aerosols may have increased upper tropospheric humidity in the 20th century, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4577–4586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4577-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4577-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buchard, V., Randles, C. A., da Silva, A. M., Darmenov, A., Colarco, P. R.,
Govindaraju, R., Ferrare, R., Hair, J., Beyersdorf, A. J., Ziemba, L. D.,
and Yu, H.: The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part II: Evaluation
and case studies, J. Climate, 30, 6851–6872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0613.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0613.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakraborty, S.: Global Aerosol Atmospheric Rivers Database, Version 1, UCLA Dataverse [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25346/S6/CXO9PD" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25346/S6/CXO9PD</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakraborty, S., Fu, R., Massie, S. T., and Stephens, G.: Relative influence
of meteorological conditions and aerosols on the lifetime of mesoscale
convective systems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 7426–7431,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601935113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1601935113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakraborty, S., Fu, R., Rosenfeld, D., and Massie, S. T.: The Influence of
Aerosols and Meteorological Conditions on the Total Rain Volume of the
Mesoscale Convective Systems Over Tropical Continents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13099–13106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080371" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL080371</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakraborty, S., Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., da Silva, A. M., Uluatam, S., and
Hess, P.: Extending the Atmospheric River Concept to Aerosols: Climate and
Air Quality Impacts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091827" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL091827</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chakraborty, S., Jiang, J. H., Su, H., and Fu, R.: On the role of aerosol radiative effect in the wet season onset timing over the Congo rainforest during boreal autumn, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12855–12866, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12855-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-12855-2021</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chapman, W. E., Subramanian, A. C., Delle Monache, L., Xie, S. P., and
Ralph, F. M.: Improving Atmospheric River Forecasts With Machine Learning,  Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10627–10635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083662" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL083662</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, T.-F., Chang, K.-H., and Tsai, C.-Y.: Modeling direct and indirect effect of long range transport on atmospheric PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, Atmos. Environ., 89, 1–9, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chylek, P. and Wong, J.: Effect of absorbing aerosols on global radiation
budget, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 929–931, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00800" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GL00800</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cook, K. H.: Generation of the African easterly jet and its role in
determining West African precipitation, J. Climate, 12, 1165–1184,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;1165:GOTAEJ&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;1165:GOTAEJ&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dai, Q., Bi, X., Song, W., Li, T., Liu, B., Ding, J., Xu, J., Song, C.,
Yang, N., Schulze, B. C., Zhang, Y., Feng, Y., and Hopke, P. K.: Residential
coal combustion as a source of primary sulfate in Xi'an, China, Atmos. Environ., 196, 66–76, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.002</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Das, S., Harshvardhan, H., Bian, H., Chin, M., Curci, G., Protonotariou, A.
P., Mielonen, T., Zhang, K., Wang, H., and Liu, X.: Biomass burning aerosol
transport and vertical distribution over the South African-Atlantic region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 6391–6415, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026421" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD026421</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dhana Laskhmi, D. and Satyanarayana, A. N. V.: Climatology of landfalling
atmospheric Rivers and associated heavy precipitation over the Indian
coastal regions, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 5616–5633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.6540</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Edwards, T. K., Smith, L. M., and Stechmann, S. N.: Atmospheric rivers and
water fluxes in precipitating quasi-geostrophic turbulence, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1960–1975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3777" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3777</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fan, J., Leung, L. R., DeMott, P. J., Comstock, J. M., Singh, B., Rosenfeld, D., Tomlinson, J. M., White, A., Prather, K. A., Minnis, P., Ayers, J. K., and Min, Q.: Aerosol impacts on California winter clouds and precipitation during CalWater 2011: local pollution versus long-range transported dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 81–101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-81-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-81-2014</ext-link>,2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fan, J., Wang, Y., Rosenfeld, D., and Liu, X.: Review of aerosol–cloud
interactions: Mechanisms, significance, and challenges, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 4221–4252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fast, J. D., Allan, J., Bahreini, R., Craven, J., Emmons, L., Ferrare, R., Hayes, P. L., Hodzic, A., Holloway, J., Hostetler, C., Jimenez, J. L., Jonsson, H., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Metcalf, A., Middlebrook, A., Nowak, J., Pekour, M., Perring, A., Russell, L., Sedlacek, A., Seinfeld, J., Setyan, A., Shilling, J., Shrivastava, M., Springston, S., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Taylor, J. W., Vinoj, V., Yang, Q., Zaveri, R. A., and Zhang, Q.: Modeling regional aerosol and aerosol precursor variability over California and its sensitivity to emissions and long-range transport during the 2010 CalNex and CARES campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10013–10060, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10013-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10013-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Febo, A., Guglielmi, F., Manigrasso, M., Ciambottini, V., and Avino, P.: Local air pollution and long–range mass transport of atmospheric particulate matter: A comparative study of the temporal evolution of the aerosol size fractions, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 1, 141–146, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Sanford, T. J., Thomson, D. S., Wilson, J. C., Pfister, L., and Lait, L.: Aerosol composition of the tropical upper troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4363–4385, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4363-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4363-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Garrett, T. J. and Hobbs, P. V: Long-range transport of continental aerosols over the Atlantic Ocean and their effects on cloud structures, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2977–2984, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan,
K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A.,
da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D.,
Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M.,
Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective
Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., Deflorio, M. J., Ralph, F. M., and
Swain, D. L.: Ridging associated with Drought across the Western and
Southwestern United States: Characteristics, trends, and predictability
sources, J. Climate, 33, 2485–2508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO): MERRA-2 tavg1_2d_aer_Nx: 2d,1-Hourly,Time-averaged,Single-Level,Assimilation,Aerosol Diagnostics V5.12.4, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], Greenbelt, MD, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/KLICLTZ8EM9D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/KLICLTZ8EM9D</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO): MERRA-2 tavgU_2d_adg_Nx: 2d,diurnal,Time-averaged,Single-Level,Assimilation,Aerosol Diagnostics (extended) V5.12.4, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/KPUMVXFEQLA1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/KPUMVXFEQLA1</ext-link>, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gohm, A., Harnisch, F., Vergeiner, J., Obleitner, F., Schnitzhofer, R.,
Hansel, A., Fix, A., Neininger, B., Emeis, S., and Schäfer, K.: Air
pollution transport in an Alpine valley: Results from airborne and
ground-based observations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 131, 441–463, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gross, A. and Baklanov, A.: Aerosol Production in the Marine Boundary Layer
Due to Emissions from DMS: Study Based on Theoretical Scenarios Guided by
Field Campaign Data, in: Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XVII, edited by: Borrego, C. and Norman, A. L., Springer US, Boston, MA, 286–294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68854-1_31" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-0-387-68854-1_31</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gu, L., Baldocchi, D. D., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W., Michalsky, J. J.,
Urbanski, S. P., and Boden, T. A.: Response of a Deciduous Forest to the
Mount Pinatubo Eruption: Enhanced Photosynthesis, Science, 299, 2035–2038, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078366" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1078366</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guan, B. and Waliser, D. E.: Detection of atmospheric rivers: Evaluation and
application of an algorithm for global studies, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 12514–12535, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD024257</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guan, B. and Waliser, D. E.: Tracking Atmospheric Rivers Globally: Spatial
Distributions and Temporal Evolution of Life Cycle Characteristics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 12523–12552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031205</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., and Martin Ralph, F.: An intercomparison between
reanalysis and dropsonde observations of the total water vapor transport in
individual atmospheric rivers, J. Hydrometeorol., 19, 321–337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0114.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-17-0114.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., and Ralph, F. M.: A multimodel evaluation of the
water vapor budget in atmospheric rivers, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1472, 139–154,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14368" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nyas.14368</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gueymard, C. A. and Yang, D.: Worldwide validation of CAMS and MERRA-2
reanalysis aerosol optical depth products using 15 years of AERONET
observations, Atmos. Environ., 225, 117216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117216</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gupta, P. and Christopher, S. A.: Particulate matter air quality assessment
using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: 2. A
neural network approach, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D20205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011497" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011497</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Han, L., Cheng, S., Zhuang, G., Ning, H., Wang, H., Wei, W., and Zhao, X.: The changes and long-range transport of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing in the past decade, Atmos. Environ., 110, 186–195, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Dickinson, R. E., and Chameides, W. L.: Impact of aerosol
indirect effect on surface temperature over East Asia, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 4371–4376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504428103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0504428103</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huning, L. S., Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Sensitivity
of Seasonal Snowfall Attribution to Atmospheric Rivers and Their
Reanalysis-Based Detection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 794–803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080783" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL080783</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jennrich, G. C., Furtado, J. C., Basara, J. B., and Martin, E. R.: Synoptic
Characteristics of 14-Day Extreme Precipitation Events across the United
States, J. Climate, 33, 6423–6440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0563.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0563.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keil, A. and Haywood, J. M.: Solar radiative forcing by biomass burning
aerosol particles during SAFARI 2000: A case study based on measured aerosol
and cloud properties, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8467, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002315" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jd002315</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Khain, A. P., BenMoshe, N., and Pokrovsky, A.: Factors determining the
impact of aerosols on surface precipitation from clouds: An attempt at
classification, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1721–1748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2515.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JAS2515.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, D. and Ramanathan, V.: Solar radiation budget and radiative forcing due
to aerosols and clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D02203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008434" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008434</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kim, Y. J., Woo, J.-H., Ma, Y.-I., Kim, S., Nam, J. S., Sung, H., Choi, K.-C., Seo, J., Kim, J. S., and Kang, C.-H.: Chemical characteristics of long-range transport aerosol at background sites in Korea, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5556–5566, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kindap, T., Unal, A., Chen, S.-H., Hu, Y., Odman, M. T., and Karaca, M.: Long-range aerosol transport from Europe to Istanbul, Turkey, Atmos. Environ., 40, 3536–3547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.055</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Knohl, A. and Baldocchi, D. D.: Effects of diffuse radiation on canopy gas
exchange processes in a forest ecosystem,  J. Geophys. Res., 113, G02023,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000663" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JG000663</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Z., Guo, J., Ding, A., Liao, H., Liu, J., Sun, Y., Wang, T., Xue, H.,
Zhang, H., and Zhu, B.: Aerosol and boundary-layer interactions and impact
on air quality, Natl. Sci. Rev., 4, 810–833, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nwx117</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Can the direct and semi-direct aerosol effect
compete with the indirect effect on a global scale?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 159–161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL012051</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Markowicz, K. M., Chilinski, M. T., Lisok, J., Zawadzka, O., Stachlewska, I. S., Janicka, L., Rozwadowska, A., Makuch, P., Pakszys, P., Zielinski, T., Petelski, T., Posyniak, M., Pietruczuk, A., Szkop, A., and Westphal, D. L.: Study of aerosol optical properties during long-range transport of biomass burning from Canada to Central Europe in July 2013, J. Aerosol Sci., 101, 156–173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.006</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martin, R. V.: Satellite remote sensing of surface air quality, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7823–7843, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.018</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>May, N. W., Quinn, P. K., McNamara, S. M., and Pratt, K. A.: Multiyear study
of the dependence of sea salt aerosol on wind speed and sea ice conditions
in the coastal Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 9208–9219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025273</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McComiskey, A. and Feingold, G.: Quantifying error in the radiative forcing
of the first aerosol indirect effect, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L02810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032667" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032667</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mishra, A. K., Koren, I., and Rudich, Y.: Effect of aerosol vertical
distribution on aerosol-radiation interaction: A theoretical prospect,
Heliyon, 1, e00036, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00036</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mori, I., Nishikawa, M., Tanimura, T., and Quan, H.: Change in size distribution and chemical composition of kosa (Asian dust) aerosol during long-range transport, Atmos. Environ., 37, 4253–4263, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>NASA: EOSDIS Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs), NASA, <uri>https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/daacs</uri>, last access: 13 June 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nash, D. and Carvalho, L. M. V.: Brief Communication: An electrifying atmospheric river – understanding the thunderstorm event in Santa Barbara County during March 2019, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1931–1940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1931-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-20-1931-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Niyogi, D., Chang, H.-I., Saxena, V. K., Holt, T., Alapaty, K., Booker, F.,
Chen, F., Davis, K. J., Holben, B., Matsui, T., Meyers, T., Oechel, W. C.,
Pielke Sr, R. A., Wells, R., Wilson, K., and Xue, Y.: Direct observations of the effects of aerosol loading on net ecosystem CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exchanges over different landscapes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L20506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020915" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL020915</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nowottnick, E. P., Colarco, P. R., Welton, E. J., and da Silva, A.: Use of the CALIOP vertical feature mask for evaluating global aerosol models, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3647–3669, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3647-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-3647-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M.: Long‐term measurements of the transport of African mineral dust to the southeastern United States: Implications for regional air quality, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15917–15927, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prospero, J. M., Olmez, I., and Ames, M.: Al and Fe in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> suspended particles in south-central Florida: The impact of the long range transport of African mineral dust, Water Air Soil Poll., 125, 291–317, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Qin, K., Wu, L., Wong, M. S., Letu, H., Hu, M., Lang, H., Sheng, S., Teng,
J., Xiao, X., and Yuan, L.: Trans-boundary aerosol transport during a winter
haze episode in China revealed by ground-based Lidar and CALIPSO satellite,
Atmos Environ, 141, 20–29, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rajeev, K., Ramanathan, V., and Meywerk, J.: Regional aerosol distribution
and its long-range transport over the Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2029–2043, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ralph, F. M., Dettinger, M. D., Rutz, J. J., and Waliser, D. E. (Eds.): Atmospheric Rivers, 2020th edn., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28906-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-030-28906-5</ext-link>, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ramanathan, V., Li, F., Ramana, M. v, Praveen, P. S., Kim, D., Corrigan, C. E., Nguyen, H., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., and Carmichael, G. R.: Atmospheric brown clouds: Hemispherical and regional variations in long‐range transport, absorption, and radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D22S21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008124</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randles, C. A., da Silva, A. M., Buchard, V., Colarco, P. R., Darmenov, A.,
Govindaraju, R., Smirnov, A., Holben, B., Ferrare, R., Hair, J., Shinozuka,
Y., and Flynn, C. J.: The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part I:
System description and data assimilation evaluation, J. Climate, 30, 6823–6850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D., Lohmann, U., Raga, G. B., O'Dowd, C. D., Kulmala, M., Fuzzi, S., Reissell, A., and Andreae, M. O.: Flood or Drought: How Do Aerosols Affect Precipitation?, Science, 321, 1309–1313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1160606</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D., Wood, R., Donner, L. J., and Sherwood, S. C.: Aerosol
Cloud-Mediated Radiative Forcing: Highly Uncertain and Opposite Effects from
Shallow and Deep Clouds, in: Climate Science for Serving Society: Research,
Modeling and Prediction Priorities, edited by: Asrar, G. R. and Hurrell, J.
W., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 105–149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6692-1_5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-007-6692-1_5</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D., Andreae, M. O., Asmi, A., Chin, M., Leeuw, G., Donovan, D.
P., Kahn, R., Kinne, S., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lau, W., Schmidt, K.
S., Suni, T., Wagner, T., Wild, M., and Quaas, J.: Global observations of
aerosol-cloud-precipitation-climate interactions, Rev. Geophys., 52, 750–808,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000441" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013RG000441</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D., Zheng, Y., Hashimshoni, E., Pöhlker, M. L., Jefferson,
A., Pöhlker, C., Yu, X., Zhu, Y., Liu, G., Yue, Z., Fischman, B., Li,
Z., Giguzin, D., Goren, T., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Pöschl, U.,
and Andreae, M. O.: Satellite retrieval of cloud condensation nuclei
concentrations by using clouds as CCN chambers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5828–5834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514044113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1514044113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Satheesh, S. K. and Ramanathan, V.: Large differences in tropical aerosol
forcing at the top of the atmosphere and Earth's surface, Nature, 405, 60–63, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35011039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35011039</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sciare, J., Oikonomou, K., Favez, O., Liakakou, E., Markaki, Z., Cachier, H., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Long-term measurements of carbonaceous aerosols in the Eastern Mediterranean: evidence of long-range transport of biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5551–5563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5551-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5551-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S., Guenther, A. B., Kahn, R., Kraucunas,
I., Kreidenweis, S. M., Molina, M. J., Nenes, A., Penner, J. E., Prather, K.
A., Ramanathan, V., Ramaswamy, V., Rasch, P. J., Ravishankara, A. R.,
Rosenfeld, D., Stephens, G., and Wood, R.: Improving our fundamental
understanding of the role of aerosol–cloud interactions in the climate
system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5781–5790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514043113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1514043113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sharma, A. R. and Déry, S. J.: Variability and trends of landfalling
atmospheric rivers along the Pacific Coast of northwestern North America, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 544–558, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.6227</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sitnov, S. A., Mokhov, I. I., and Likhosherstova, A. A.: Exploring
large-scale black-carbon air pollution over Northern Eurasia in summer
2016 using MERRA-2 reanalysis data, Atmos. Res., 235, 104763, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104763" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104763</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sofiev, M., Soares, J., Prank, M., de Leeuw, G., and Kukkonen, J.: A
regional-to-global model of emission and transport of sea salt particles in
the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D21302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014713" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014713</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Song, C. H. and Carmichael, G. R.: The aging process of naturally emitted aerosol (sea-salt and mineral aerosol) during long range transport, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2203–2218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00301-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00301-X</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and
precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08281" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08281</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Swap, R., Garstang, M., Macko, S. A., Tyson, P. D., Maenhaut, W., Artaxo, P., Kållberg, P., and Talbot, R.: The long‐range transport of southern African aerosols to the tropical South Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 23777–23791, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Takemura, T., Uno, I., Nakajima, T., Higurashi, A., and Sano, I.: Modeling study of long‐range transport of Asian dust and anthropogenic aerosols from East Asia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016251" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016251</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Takemura, T., Nozawa, T., Emori, S., Nakajima, T. Y., and Nakajima, T.:
Simulation of climate response to aerosol direct and indirect effects with
aerosol transport-radiation model, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D02202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005029</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tomasi, C., Vitale, V., Lupi, A., di Carmine, C., Campanelli, M., Herber,
A., Treffeisen, R., Stone, R. S., Andrews, E., and Sharma, S.: Aerosols in
polar regions: A historical overview based on optical depth and in situ
observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008432" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008432</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J. and Christopher, S. A.: Intercomparison between satellite-derived
aerosol optical thickness and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass: Implications for air quality
studies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2095, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018174</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wang, S.-H., Tsay, S.-C., Lin, N.-H., Hsu, N. C., Bell, S. W., Li, C., Ji,
Q., Jeong, M.-J., Hansell, R. A., and Welton, E. J.: First detailed
observations of long-range transported dust over the northern South China
Sea, Atmos. Environ., 45, 4804–4808, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Zhang, Q. Q., He, K., Zhang, Q., and Chai, L.: Sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosols over China: response to 2000–2015 emission changes of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and ammonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2635–2652, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2635-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2635-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Zheng, X., Dong, X., Xi, B., Wu, P., Logan, T., and Yung, Y. L.: Impacts of long-range transport of aerosols on marine-boundary-layer clouds in the eastern North Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14741–14755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14741-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-14741-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Walsh, J., Szymborski, S., and Peng, M.: Rapid arctic sea ice loss
on the synoptic time scale and related atmospheric circulation anomalies, J. Climate, 33, 1597–1617, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0528.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0528.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weinzierl, B., Ansmann, A., Prospero, J. M., Althausen, D., Benker, N., Chouza, F., Dollner, M., Farrell, D., Fomba, W. K., Freudenthaler, V., Gasteiger, J., Groß, S., Haarig, M., Heinold, B., Kandler, K., Kristensen, T. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Müller, T., Reitebuch, O., Sauer, D., Schäfler, A., Schepanski, K., Spanu, A., Tegen, I., Toledano, C., and Walser, A.: The Saharan Aerosol Long-Range Transport and Aerosol–Cloud-Interaction Experiment: Overview and Selected Highlights, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1427–1451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00142.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00142.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, M. L. C., Reale, O., Schubert, S. D., Suarez, M. J., Koster, R. D., and
Pegion, P. J.: African easterly jet: Structure and maintenance, J. Climate, 22, 4459–4480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2584.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JCLI2584.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xi, X. and Sokolik, I. N.: Impact of Asian Dust Aerosol and Surface Albedo
on Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Surface Radiative Balance in
Dryland Ecosystems, Adv. Meteorol., 2012, 276207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/276207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2012/276207</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Wu, H., Yang, X., and Xie, L.: Distribution and transport
characteristics of dust aerosol over Tibetan Plateau and Taklimakan Desert
in China using MERRA-2 and CALIPSO data, Atmos. Environ., 237, 117670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117670" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117670</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, Y. and Kim, H.: Impact of Distinct Origin Locations on the Life Cycles
of Landfalling Atmospheric Rivers Over the U.S. West Coast, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 11897–11909, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031218</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y. and Newell, R. E.: Atmospheric rivers and bombs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1999–2002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94GL01710</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y. and Newell, R. E.: A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from
atmospheric rivers, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 725–735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126&lt;0725:APAFMF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126&lt;0725:APAFMF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Aerosol atmospheric rivers: climatology, event characteristics, and detection algorithm sensitivities</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abdalmogith, S. S. and Harrison, R. M.: The use of trajectory cluster analysis to examine the long-range transport of secondary inorganic aerosol in the UK, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6686–6695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.059</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ackermann, I. J., Hass, H., Memmesheimer, M., Ziegenbein, C., and Ebel, A.:
The parametrization of the sulfate-nitrate-ammonia aerosol system in the
long-range transport model EURAD, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 57, 101–114, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Adebiyi, A. A. and Zuidema, P.: The role of the southern African easterly
jet in modifying the southeast Atlantic aerosol and cloud environments, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1574–1589, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2765" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2765</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions.
Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bertschi, I. T., Jaffe, D. A., Jaeglé, L., Price, H. U., and Dennison,
J. B.: PHOBEA/ITCT 2002 airborne observations of transpacific transport of
ozone, CO, volatile organic compounds, and aerosols to the northeast
Pacific: Impacts of Asian anthropogenic and Siberian boreal fire emissions,
J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23S12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004328</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bister, M. and Kulmala, M.: Anthropogenic aerosols may have increased upper tropospheric humidity in the 20th century, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4577–4586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4577-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4577-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Buchard, V., Randles, C. A., da Silva, A. M., Darmenov, A., Colarco, P. R.,
Govindaraju, R., Ferrare, R., Hair, J., Beyersdorf, A. J., Ziemba, L. D.,
and Yu, H.: The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part II: Evaluation
and case studies, J. Climate, 30, 6851–6872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0613.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0613.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chakraborty, S.: Global Aerosol Atmospheric Rivers Database, Version 1, UCLA Dataverse [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25346/S6/CXO9PD" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25346/S6/CXO9PD</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chakraborty, S., Fu, R., Massie, S. T., and Stephens, G.: Relative influence
of meteorological conditions and aerosols on the lifetime of mesoscale
convective systems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 7426–7431,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601935113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601935113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chakraborty, S., Fu, R., Rosenfeld, D., and Massie, S. T.: The Influence of
Aerosols and Meteorological Conditions on the Total Rain Volume of the
Mesoscale Convective Systems Over Tropical Continents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13099–13106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080371" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080371</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chakraborty, S., Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., da Silva, A. M., Uluatam, S., and
Hess, P.: Extending the Atmospheric River Concept to Aerosols: Climate and
Air Quality Impacts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091827" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091827</a>, 2021a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chakraborty, S., Jiang, J. H., Su, H., and Fu, R.: On the role of aerosol radiative effect in the wet season onset timing over the Congo rainforest during boreal autumn, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12855–12866, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12855-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12855-2021</a>, 2021b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chapman, W. E., Subramanian, A. C., Delle Monache, L., Xie, S. P., and
Ralph, F. M.: Improving Atmospheric River Forecasts With Machine Learning,  Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10627–10635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083662" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083662</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, T.-F., Chang, K.-H., and Tsai, C.-Y.: Modeling direct and indirect effect of long range transport on atmospheric PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels, Atmos. Environ., 89, 1–9, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chylek, P. and Wong, J.: Effect of absorbing aerosols on global radiation
budget, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 929–931, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00800" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00800</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, K. H.: Generation of the African easterly jet and its role in
determining West African precipitation, J. Climate, 12, 1165–1184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;1165:GOTAEJ&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;1165:GOTAEJ&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, Q., Bi, X., Song, W., Li, T., Liu, B., Ding, J., Xu, J., Song, C.,
Yang, N., Schulze, B. C., Zhang, Y., Feng, Y., and Hopke, P. K.: Residential
coal combustion as a source of primary sulfate in Xi'an, China, Atmos. Environ., 196, 66–76, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.002</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Das, S., Harshvardhan, H., Bian, H., Chin, M., Curci, G., Protonotariou, A.
P., Mielonen, T., Zhang, K., Wang, H., and Liu, X.: Biomass burning aerosol
transport and vertical distribution over the South African-Atlantic region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 6391–6415, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026421" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026421</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dhana Laskhmi, D. and Satyanarayana, A. N. V.: Climatology of landfalling
atmospheric Rivers and associated heavy precipitation over the Indian
coastal regions, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 5616–5633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6540</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Edwards, T. K., Smith, L. M., and Stechmann, S. N.: Atmospheric rivers and
water fluxes in precipitating quasi-geostrophic turbulence, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1960–1975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3777" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3777</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, J., Leung, L. R., DeMott, P. J., Comstock, J. M., Singh, B., Rosenfeld, D., Tomlinson, J. M., White, A., Prather, K. A., Minnis, P., Ayers, J. K., and Min, Q.: Aerosol impacts on California winter clouds and precipitation during CalWater 2011: local pollution versus long-range transported dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 81–101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-81-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-81-2014</a>,2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, J., Wang, Y., Rosenfeld, D., and Liu, X.: Review of aerosol–cloud
interactions: Mechanisms, significance, and challenges, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 4221–4252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fast, J. D., Allan, J., Bahreini, R., Craven, J., Emmons, L., Ferrare, R., Hayes, P. L., Hodzic, A., Holloway, J., Hostetler, C., Jimenez, J. L., Jonsson, H., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Metcalf, A., Middlebrook, A., Nowak, J., Pekour, M., Perring, A., Russell, L., Sedlacek, A., Seinfeld, J., Setyan, A., Shilling, J., Shrivastava, M., Springston, S., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Taylor, J. W., Vinoj, V., Yang, Q., Zaveri, R. A., and Zhang, Q.: Modeling regional aerosol and aerosol precursor variability over California and its sensitivity to emissions and long-range transport during the 2010 CalNex and CARES campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10013–10060, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10013-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10013-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Febo, A., Guglielmi, F., Manigrasso, M., Ciambottini, V., and Avino, P.: Local air pollution and long–range mass transport of atmospheric particulate matter: A comparative study of the temporal evolution of the aerosol size fractions, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 1, 141–146, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Sanford, T. J., Thomson, D. S., Wilson, J. C., Pfister, L., and Lait, L.: Aerosol composition of the tropical upper troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4363–4385, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4363-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4363-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Garrett, T. J. and Hobbs, P. V: Long-range transport of continental aerosols over the Atlantic Ocean and their effects on cloud structures, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2977–2984, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan,
K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A.,
da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D.,
Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M.,
Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective
Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Gibson, P. B., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., Deflorio, M. J., Ralph, F. M., and
Swain, D. L.: Ridging associated with Drought across the Western and
Southwestern United States: Characteristics, trends, and predictability
sources, J. Climate, 33, 2485–2508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0439.1</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO): MERRA-2 tavg1_2d_aer_Nx: 2d,1-Hourly,Time-averaged,Single-Level,Assimilation,Aerosol Diagnostics V5.12.4, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], Greenbelt, MD, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/KLICLTZ8EM9D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/KLICLTZ8EM9D</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO): MERRA-2 tavgU_2d_adg_Nx: 2d,diurnal,Time-averaged,Single-Level,Assimilation,Aerosol Diagnostics (extended) V5.12.4, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/KPUMVXFEQLA1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/KPUMVXFEQLA1</a>, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Gohm, A., Harnisch, F., Vergeiner, J., Obleitner, F., Schnitzhofer, R.,
Hansel, A., Fix, A., Neininger, B., Emeis, S., and Schäfer, K.: Air
pollution transport in an Alpine valley: Results from airborne and
ground-based observations, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 131, 441–463, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gross, A. and Baklanov, A.: Aerosol Production in the Marine Boundary Layer
Due to Emissions from DMS: Study Based on Theoretical Scenarios Guided by
Field Campaign Data, in: Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XVII, edited by: Borrego, C. and Norman, A. L., Springer US, Boston, MA, 286–294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68854-1_31" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68854-1_31</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Gu, L., Baldocchi, D. D., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W., Michalsky, J. J.,
Urbanski, S. P., and Boden, T. A.: Response of a Deciduous Forest to the
Mount Pinatubo Eruption: Enhanced Photosynthesis, Science, 299, 2035–2038, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078366" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078366</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Guan, B. and Waliser, D. E.: Detection of atmospheric rivers: Evaluation and
application of an algorithm for global studies, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 12514–12535, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024257" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024257</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Guan, B. and Waliser, D. E.: Tracking Atmospheric Rivers Globally: Spatial
Distributions and Temporal Evolution of Life Cycle Characteristics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 12523–12552, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031205</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., and Martin Ralph, F.: An intercomparison between
reanalysis and dropsonde observations of the total water vapor transport in
individual atmospheric rivers, J. Hydrometeorol., 19, 321–337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0114.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0114.1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., and Ralph, F. M.: A multimodel evaluation of the
water vapor budget in atmospheric rivers, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1472, 139–154,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14368" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14368</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Gueymard, C. A. and Yang, D.: Worldwide validation of CAMS and MERRA-2
reanalysis aerosol optical depth products using 15 years of AERONET
observations, Atmos. Environ., 225, 117216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117216" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117216</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Gupta, P. and Christopher, S. A.: Particulate matter air quality assessment
using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: 2. A
neural network approach, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D20205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011497" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011497</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Han, L., Cheng, S., Zhuang, G., Ning, H., Wang, H., Wei, W., and Zhao, X.: The changes and long-range transport of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Beijing in the past decade, Atmos. Environ., 110, 186–195, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y., Dickinson, R. E., and Chameides, W. L.: Impact of aerosol
indirect effect on surface temperature over East Asia, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 4371–4376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504428103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504428103</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Huning, L. S., Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Sensitivity
of Seasonal Snowfall Attribution to Atmospheric Rivers and Their
Reanalysis-Based Detection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 794–803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080783" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080783</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp., 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jennrich, G. C., Furtado, J. C., Basara, J. B., and Martin, E. R.: Synoptic
Characteristics of 14-Day Extreme Precipitation Events across the United
States, J. Climate, 33, 6423–6440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0563.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0563.1</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Keil, A. and Haywood, J. M.: Solar radiative forcing by biomass burning
aerosol particles during SAFARI 2000: A case study based on measured aerosol
and cloud properties, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8467, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002315" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002315</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Khain, A. P., BenMoshe, N., and Pokrovsky, A.: Factors determining the
impact of aerosols on surface precipitation from clouds: An attempt at
classification, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1721–1748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2515.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2515.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, D. and Ramanathan, V.: Solar radiation budget and radiative forcing due
to aerosols and clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D02203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008434" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008434</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, Y. J., Woo, J.-H., Ma, Y.-I., Kim, S., Nam, J. S., Sung, H., Choi, K.-C., Seo, J., Kim, J. S., and Kang, C.-H.: Chemical characteristics of long-range transport aerosol at background sites in Korea, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5556–5566, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Kindap, T., Unal, A., Chen, S.-H., Hu, Y., Odman, M. T., and Karaca, M.: Long-range aerosol transport from Europe to Istanbul, Turkey, Atmos. Environ., 40, 3536–3547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.055</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Knohl, A. and Baldocchi, D. D.: Effects of diffuse radiation on canopy gas
exchange processes in a forest ecosystem,  J. Geophys. Res., 113, G02023,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000663" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000663</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Guo, J., Ding, A., Liao, H., Liu, J., Sun, Y., Wang, T., Xue, H.,
Zhang, H., and Zhu, B.: Aerosol and boundary-layer interactions and impact
on air quality, Natl. Sci. Rev., 4, 810–833, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx117</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Can the direct and semi-direct aerosol effect
compete with the indirect effect on a global scale?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 159–161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012051</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Markowicz, K. M., Chilinski, M. T., Lisok, J., Zawadzka, O., Stachlewska, I. S., Janicka, L., Rozwadowska, A., Makuch, P., Pakszys, P., Zielinski, T., Petelski, T., Posyniak, M., Pietruczuk, A., Szkop, A., and Westphal, D. L.: Study of aerosol optical properties during long-range transport of biomass burning from Canada to Central Europe in July 2013, J. Aerosol Sci., 101, 156–173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.006</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, R. V.: Satellite remote sensing of surface air quality, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7823–7843, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.018</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
May, N. W., Quinn, P. K., McNamara, S. M., and Pratt, K. A.: Multiyear study
of the dependence of sea salt aerosol on wind speed and sea ice conditions
in the coastal Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 9208–9219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025273" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025273</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
McComiskey, A. and Feingold, G.: Quantifying error in the radiative forcing
of the first aerosol indirect effect, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L02810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032667" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032667</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Mishra, A. K., Koren, I., and Rudich, Y.: Effect of aerosol vertical
distribution on aerosol-radiation interaction: A theoretical prospect,
Heliyon, 1, e00036, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00036</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Mori, I., Nishikawa, M., Tanimura, T., and Quan, H.: Change in size distribution and chemical composition of kosa (Asian dust) aerosol during long-range transport, Atmos. Environ., 37, 4253–4263, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
NASA: EOSDIS Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs), NASA, <a href="https://earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/daacs" target="_blank"/>, last access: 13 June 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Nash, D. and Carvalho, L. M. V.: Brief Communication: An electrifying atmospheric river – understanding the thunderstorm event in Santa Barbara County during March 2019, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1931–1940, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1931-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1931-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Niyogi, D., Chang, H.-I., Saxena, V. K., Holt, T., Alapaty, K., Booker, F.,
Chen, F., Davis, K. J., Holben, B., Matsui, T., Meyers, T., Oechel, W. C.,
Pielke Sr, R. A., Wells, R., Wilson, K., and Xue, Y.: Direct observations of the effects of aerosol loading on net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchanges over different landscapes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L20506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020915" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020915</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Nowottnick, E. P., Colarco, P. R., Welton, E. J., and da Silva, A.: Use of the CALIOP vertical feature mask for evaluating global aerosol models, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3647–3669, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3647-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3647-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M.: Long‐term measurements of the transport of African mineral dust to the southeastern United States: Implications for regional air quality, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15917–15927, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M., Olmez, I., and Ames, M.: Al and Fe in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> suspended particles in south-central Florida: The impact of the long range transport of African mineral dust, Water Air Soil Poll., 125, 291–317, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, K., Wu, L., Wong, M. S., Letu, H., Hu, M., Lang, H., Sheng, S., Teng,
J., Xiao, X., and Yuan, L.: Trans-boundary aerosol transport during a winter
haze episode in China revealed by ground-based Lidar and CALIPSO satellite,
Atmos Environ, 141, 20–29, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Rajeev, K., Ramanathan, V., and Meywerk, J.: Regional aerosol distribution
and its long-range transport over the Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2029–2043, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Ralph, F. M., Dettinger, M. D., Rutz, J. J., and Waliser, D. E. (Eds.): Atmospheric Rivers, 2020th edn., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28906-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28906-5</a>, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V., Li, F., Ramana, M. v, Praveen, P. S., Kim, D., Corrigan, C. E., Nguyen, H., Stone, E. A., Schauer, J. J., and Carmichael, G. R.: Atmospheric brown clouds: Hemispherical and regional variations in long‐range transport, absorption, and radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D22S21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008124</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Randles, C. A., da Silva, A. M., Buchard, V., Colarco, P. R., Darmenov, A.,
Govindaraju, R., Smirnov, A., Holben, B., Ferrare, R., Hair, J., Shinozuka,
Y., and Flynn, C. J.: The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part I:
System description and data assimilation evaluation, J. Climate, 30, 6823–6850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D., Lohmann, U., Raga, G. B., O'Dowd, C. D., Kulmala, M., Fuzzi, S., Reissell, A., and Andreae, M. O.: Flood or Drought: How Do Aerosols Affect Precipitation?, Science, 321, 1309–1313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160606" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160606</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D., Wood, R., Donner, L. J., and Sherwood, S. C.: Aerosol
Cloud-Mediated Radiative Forcing: Highly Uncertain and Opposite Effects from
Shallow and Deep Clouds, in: Climate Science for Serving Society: Research,
Modeling and Prediction Priorities, edited by: Asrar, G. R. and Hurrell, J.
W., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 105–149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6692-1_5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6692-1_5</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D., Andreae, M. O., Asmi, A., Chin, M., Leeuw, G., Donovan, D.
P., Kahn, R., Kinne, S., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lau, W., Schmidt, K.
S., Suni, T., Wagner, T., Wild, M., and Quaas, J.: Global observations of
aerosol-cloud-precipitation-climate interactions, Rev. Geophys., 52, 750–808,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000441" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000441</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D., Zheng, Y., Hashimshoni, E., Pöhlker, M. L., Jefferson,
A., Pöhlker, C., Yu, X., Zhu, Y., Liu, G., Yue, Z., Fischman, B., Li,
Z., Giguzin, D., Goren, T., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Pöschl, U.,
and Andreae, M. O.: Satellite retrieval of cloud condensation nuclei
concentrations by using clouds as CCN chambers, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5828–5834, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514044113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514044113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Satheesh, S. K. and Ramanathan, V.: Large differences in tropical aerosol
forcing at the top of the atmosphere and Earth's surface, Nature, 405, 60–63, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35011039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/35011039</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Sciare, J., Oikonomou, K., Favez, O., Liakakou, E., Markaki, Z., Cachier, H., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Long-term measurements of carbonaceous aerosols in the Eastern Mediterranean: evidence of long-range transport of biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5551–5563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5551-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5551-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S., Guenther, A. B., Kahn, R., Kraucunas,
I., Kreidenweis, S. M., Molina, M. J., Nenes, A., Penner, J. E., Prather, K.
A., Ramanathan, V., Ramaswamy, V., Rasch, P. J., Ravishankara, A. R.,
Rosenfeld, D., Stephens, G., and Wood, R.: Improving our fundamental
understanding of the role of aerosol–cloud interactions in the climate
system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5781–5790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514043113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514043113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Sharma, A. R. and Déry, S. J.: Variability and trends of landfalling
atmospheric rivers along the Pacific Coast of northwestern North America, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 544–558, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6227</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Sitnov, S. A., Mokhov, I. I., and Likhosherstova, A. A.: Exploring
large-scale black-carbon air pollution over Northern Eurasia in summer
2016 using MERRA-2 reanalysis data, Atmos. Res., 235, 104763, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104763" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104763</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Sofiev, M., Soares, J., Prank, M., de Leeuw, G., and Kukkonen, J.: A
regional-to-global model of emission and transport of sea salt particles in
the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D21302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014713" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014713</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Song, C. H. and Carmichael, G. R.: The aging process of naturally emitted aerosol (sea-salt and mineral aerosol) during long range transport, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2203–2218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00301-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00301-X</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and
precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08281" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08281</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Swap, R., Garstang, M., Macko, S. A., Tyson, P. D., Maenhaut, W., Artaxo, P., Kållberg, P., and Talbot, R.: The long‐range transport of southern African aerosols to the tropical South Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 23777–23791, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Takemura, T., Uno, I., Nakajima, T., Higurashi, A., and Sano, I.: Modeling study of long‐range transport of Asian dust and anthropogenic aerosols from East Asia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2158, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016251" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016251</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Takemura, T., Nozawa, T., Emori, S., Nakajima, T. Y., and Nakajima, T.:
Simulation of climate response to aerosol direct and indirect effects with
aerosol transport-radiation model, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D02202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005029</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Tomasi, C., Vitale, V., Lupi, A., di Carmine, C., Campanelli, M., Herber,
A., Treffeisen, R., Stone, R. S., Andrews, E., and Sharma, S.: Aerosols in
polar regions: A historical overview based on optical depth and in situ
observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008432" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008432</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J. and Christopher, S. A.: Intercomparison between satellite-derived
aerosol optical thickness and PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass: Implications for air quality
studies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2095, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018174</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, S.-H., Tsay, S.-C., Lin, N.-H., Hsu, N. C., Bell, S. W., Li, C., Ji,
Q., Jeong, M.-J., Hansell, R. A., and Welton, E. J.: First detailed
observations of long-range transported dust over the northern South China
Sea, Atmos. Environ., 45, 4804–4808, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Zhang, Q. Q., He, K., Zhang, Q., and Chai, L.: Sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosols over China: response to 2000–2015 emission changes of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and ammonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2635–2652, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2635-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2635-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Zheng, X., Dong, X., Xi, B., Wu, P., Logan, T., and Yung, Y. L.: Impacts of long-range transport of aerosols on marine-boundary-layer clouds in the eastern North Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14741–14755, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14741-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14741-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z., Walsh, J., Szymborski, S., and Peng, M.: Rapid arctic sea ice loss
on the synoptic time scale and related atmospheric circulation anomalies, J. Climate, 33, 1597–1617, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0528.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0528.1</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Weinzierl, B., Ansmann, A., Prospero, J. M., Althausen, D., Benker, N., Chouza, F., Dollner, M., Farrell, D., Fomba, W. K., Freudenthaler, V., Gasteiger, J., Groß, S., Haarig, M., Heinold, B., Kandler, K., Kristensen, T. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Müller, T., Reitebuch, O., Sauer, D., Schäfler, A., Schepanski, K., Spanu, A., Tegen, I., Toledano, C., and Walser, A.: The Saharan Aerosol Long-Range Transport and Aerosol–Cloud-Interaction Experiment: Overview and Selected Highlights, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1427–1451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00142.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00142.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, M. L. C., Reale, O., Schubert, S. D., Suarez, M. J., Koster, R. D., and
Pegion, P. J.: African easterly jet: Structure and maintenance, J. Climate, 22, 4459–4480, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2584.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2584.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Xi, X. and Sokolik, I. N.: Impact of Asian Dust Aerosol and Surface Albedo
on Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Surface Radiative Balance in
Dryland Ecosystems, Adv. Meteorol., 2012, 276207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/276207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/276207</a>, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, X., Wu, H., Yang, X., and Xie, L.: Distribution and transport
characteristics of dust aerosol over Tibetan Plateau and Taklimakan Desert
in China using MERRA-2 and CALIPSO data, Atmos. Environ., 237, 117670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117670" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117670</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, Y. and Kim, H.: Impact of Distinct Origin Locations on the Life Cycles
of Landfalling Atmospheric Rivers Over the U.S. West Coast, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 11897–11909, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031218" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031218</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Y. and Newell, R. E.: Atmospheric rivers and bombs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1999–2002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01710</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Y. and Newell, R. E.: A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from
atmospheric rivers, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 725–735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126&lt;0725:APAFMF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126&lt;0725:APAFMF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
