<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-7259-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Elucidating the critical oligomeric steps in secondary organic aerosol and
brown carbon formation</article-title><alt-title>Elucidating the critical oligomeric steps in SOA and BrC formation</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Elucidating the critical oligomeric steps in SOA and BrC formation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. Ji et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>Yuemeng</given-names></name>
          <email>jiym@gdut.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-4276</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Qiuju</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Xiaohui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>Lei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jiaxin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Yixin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>Yanpeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Guiying</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Renyi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-3862</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>An</surname><given-names>Taicheng</given-names></name>
          <email>antc99@gdut.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Contaminants Exposure
and Health, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Health
Risk Control, Institute Environmental Health and Pollution Control,
Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Pollution
Control, Key Laboratory of City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green
Development (Department of Education), School of Environmental Science and
Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&amp;M University, College
Station, Texas 77843, United States</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yuemeng Ji (jiym@gdut.edu.cn) and Taicheng An (antc99@gdut.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>June</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>7259</fpage><lpage>7271</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e180">Small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls represent the major
precursors of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and brown carbon (BrC) in the
atmosphere, but the chemical mechanisms leading to their formation remain
unclear. Here we elucidate the fundamental kinetics and mechanisms for
aqueous-phase oligomerization of glyoxal (GL) using quantum chemical and
kinetic rate calculations. Our results identify several essential isomeric
processes for GL, including protonation to yield diol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> tetrol and carbenium
ions, nucleophilic addition of carbenium ions to diol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> tetrol as well as to
free methylamine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ammonia (MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM), and deprotonation to propagate oligomers
and N-heterocycles. Both protonation and nucleophilic addition occur without
activation barriers and are dominantly driven by electrostatic attraction.
Deprotonation proceeds readily via water molecules in the absence of MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM
but corresponds to the rate-limiting step for N-containing cationic
intermediates to yield N-heterocycles. On the other hand, the latter occurs
readily via a catalytic process by acidic anions (e.g., SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A
carbenium ion-mediated reaction rate of GL is 4.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under atmospheric conditions, in good agreement with the
experimental data. Our results provide essential mechanistic and kinetic
data for accurate assessment of the role of small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls in
SOA and BrC formation.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e288">Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from biogenic and anthropogenic sources
are of particular importance due to their chemical reactivity and high
abundance in the atmosphere (Piccot, 1992; Acosta Navarro et al., 2014).
Gas-phase reactions of VOCs associated with photochemical oxidant cycles
generally produce secondary organic aerosol (SOA) particle mass and increase
tropospheric ozone concentration (Lim et al., 2005; Ziemann and Atkinson,
2012; S. Wang et al., 2020; Y. Wang et al., 2020; Ge et al., 2021; Ma et al.,
2021). Hence, the emission of VOCs is a key process in controlling the
formation and growth of new particles over continental regions. Oxidation of
biogenic terpenes from terrestrial vegetation and aromatics from human
activities generates a large number of organic carbonyls, which are major
precursors of SOA (Altieri et al., 2006; Volkamer et al., 2001; Gomez
Alvarez et al., 2007; Sareen et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2020). These organic
carbonyls engage in a variety of reactions, including new particle
formation, condensation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> equilibrium partitioning, particle- and
aqueous-phase reactions, leading to the formation of additional products in the
particle phase (Loeffler et al., 2006; Kroll et al., 2005; Nozière et
al., 2009; Marrero-Ortiz et al., 2019; Tuguldurova et al., 2019; Kua et al.,
2011; Li et al., 2020; Shi et al., 2019; Xia et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e298">Glyoxal (GL), an important and simple carbonyl compound, originates from
the gas-phase oxidation of biogenic isoprene and anthropogenic aromatics (Volkamer et al., 2001; Gomez Alvarez et al., 2007; Lim et al., 2005).
The global source of GL is estimated to be 45–56 Tg yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fu et al.,
2008; Myriokefalitakis et al., 2008), with a predicted contribution of 2.6 Tg C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to global SOA mass (Fu et al., 2008). GL and
methylglyoxal contribute to 16 % of SOA mass during a severe haze episode
in Hebei Province, China (J. Li et al., 2021). In Mexico City, GL
contributes at least 15 % of SOA mass (Volkamer et al.,
2007), and in the Pearl River Delta, China, 21 % of SOA formation
originates from the heterogeneous reactions of GL and methylglyoxal (Ling et al., 2020). Hence, GL is a primary contributor to the rapid
and efficient formation of SOA under urban environments. The aqueous-phase
reaction of GL starts with hydration, subsequently forming several
high-molecular-weight oligomers, such as dimers, trimers, tetramers, and
pentamers (Hastings et al., 2005; Loeffler et al., 2006; Gomez et al.,
2015; Kua et al., 2008; Avzianova and Brooks, 2013). Previous theoretical
studies have suggested that the direct hydration of GL is thermodynamically
and kinetically unfeasible (Shi et al., 2020; Ji et al., 2020). The rapid
growth of SOA was observed in sulfuric acid nanoparticles (Jang et al.,
2002; Huang et al., 2016; Surratt et al., 2007; Liggio et al., 2005b), while
several other studies have revealed little effect of acids (such as sulfuric
acid) on the formation of GL oligomers (Loeffler et al., 2006; Kroll et
al., 2005). Hence, the aqueous-phase chemical reaction mechanism of GL and
its role in SOA formation are still unclear.</p>
      <p id="d1e325">On the other hand, brown carbon (BrC) is also generated by the aqueous-phase
reaction of GL in the presence of amines or ammonium in the troposphere (Y. Li et al., 2021; Shapiro et al., 2009; Galloway et al., 2009; Lee et
al., 2013; Maxut et al., 2015; Marrero-Ortiz et al., 2019; Tuguldurova et
al., 2019; Kua et al., 2011). Zhang and co-workers have revealed a slight
browning of glyoxal-amine mixtures (Marrero-Ortiz et al., 2019; Y. Li et
al., 2021). They have also identified oligomers and N-heterocycles
in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas only oligomers
were detected in NaCl (Y. Li et al., 2021). Shapiro et al. have detected
light-absorbing products, slowly formed from GL in a mildly acidic salt
solution of (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, using ultraviolet–visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometry, and
matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (Shapiro et al., 2009). A chamber study of GL uptake
to (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> solution was performed using a
high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer and found that
carbon–nitrogen (C-N) compounds are irreversibly produced in the solution (Galloway et al., 2009). However, De Haan et al. (2020)
have described a rapid but reversible BrC formation in
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> droplets in dry condition (RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) using
cavity-attenuated phase shift single-scattering albedo spectrometry (De Haan et al., 2020). In addition, Powelson et al. (2014) found that the reaction of GL with methylamine is more effective than that
with (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by using UV-vis and fluorescence spectroscopy (Powelson et al., 2014), while Lian et al. (2020) have proven that the synergistic effect of ammonium and amines contributes to the
formation of imidazole in cloud processing (Lian et al.,
2020). Most previous studies have shown that imidazole and
high-molecular-weight light-absorbing C-N compounds are produced by
different atmospheric chemical reactions of GL with amines <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ammonium, but the
reaction mechanism is yet to be clarified.</p>
      <p id="d1e498">In this work, the aqueous-phase chemistry of GL in the absence and presence
of methylamine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ammonia (MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM) was systematically investigated using quantum
chemical calculations. The fundamental chemical mechanisms of the formation
of oligomers and N-heterocycles were investigated. The chemical composition
and the product distribution were also estimated and characterized by
conventional transition state theory considering solvent cage and
diffusion-limited effects (Methods). The aerosol growth rate for the
heterogeneous chemistry of GL was also evaluated under different atmospheric
conditions. We paid special attention to the key factors in the
formation of SOA and BrC from GL to provide insight into the important role
of the aqueous-phase chemistry of GL.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e523">All quantum chemical calculations were performed by means of the Gaussian 09
program (Frisch
et al., 2009). The solvent effect of water in the aqueous phase was
considered with a continuum solvation model (SMD) (Marenich et
al., 2009). The solvation free energy includes two components: the bulk
electrostatic contribution and the cavity-dispersion-solvent-structure
contribution arising from short-range interactions between the solute and
solvent molecules. Geometry optimization of all stationary points (SPs), such
as reactants, transition states (TSs), intermediates, and products, was
calculated using the M06-2X functional (Zhao and Truhlar, 2008) with
the 6-311G(d,p) basis set (Ji et al., 2017, 2020), i.e., the
M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) level, which has shown good performance in describing the
geometrical optimization of the heterogeneous reactions of small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls (Ji et al., 2020; Shi et al., 2020). Thermodynamic
contributions and harmonic vibrational frequencies were calculated at the
same level as that for geometry optimization to identify all SPs as either a
TS (exactly with only one imaginary frequency) or the minima (zero imaginary
frequency). Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations were
implemented to construct the minimum energy pathway (MEP), verifying that
each TS accurately connected the corresponding reactants and products. At
the same level, TS was searched by examining the SP using the TS keyword in
geometry optimization, while the absence of a TS was confirmed if no energy
exceeded the bond dissociation energy along the reaction coordinate (Ji
et al., 2020). The TSs for four deprotonation pathways in GL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM
reaction systems were identified at the M06-2X/6-311G(d) level because none
of them was searched at the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) level (detailed discussion
in the Supplement). Pointwise potential curve (PPC) scanning was
performed to further confirm a barrierless process at the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p)
level (Hazra and Sinha, 2011). For this method, all other
geometric parameters were fully optimized, except for fixing the internal
breaking or forming bond length (detailed in the Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e547">Based on the aforementioned optimized structures, single-point energy (SPE)
calculation was performed to refine potential energy surface (PES) with a
more flexible basis set 6-311 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> G(3df,3pd), i.e., at the
M06-2X/6-311 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> G(3df,3pd) level. For simplicity, hereinafter they are
denoted as the X//Y, i.e., M06-2X//M06-2X level, where Y is an SPE
calculation at the M06-2X/6-311 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> G(3df,3pd) level and X is the geometry
optimized at the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) level. To further evaluate the results
at the M06-2X//M06-2X level, a higher-level calculation using the CCSD(T)
method with the flexible 6-311 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> G(2df,2p) basis set was performed to refine
the PESs. The CCSD(T) method (Lutnaes et al., 2009; Raghavachari and
Trucks, 1989), i.e., coupled cluster approach with single and double
substitutions including a perturbative estimation of connected triple
substitutions, corresponds to a higher electronic correlation method. As
discussed in the Supplement, the M06-2X//M06-2X level is
suitable for predicting energies and kinetics, and also represents a compromise
between computational efficiency and accuracy.</p>
      <p id="d1e578">The rate constants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the pathways with TSs were calculated using the
conventional transition state theory (TST) (Gao et al., 2014; Galano and
Alvarez-Idaboy, 2009) based on the above PES information:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exp</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‡</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the Planck and Boltzmann constants, respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">‡</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the activation barrier energy with the thermodynamic
contribution corrections and solvent cage effects, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
reaction path degeneracy. To simulate realistic conditions in the solution,
the rate constants are refined by using solvent cage effects (Okuno, 1997) and diffusion-limited effects (Collins
and Kimball, 1949). For some of the reactions with low free-energy barriers,
the rate constants are found to be close to the diffusion limit, which is
calculated using the Collins–Kimball theory (Gao et al., 2014). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of the pathways without TSs are controlled by the diffusion-limit
effect and thereby are equal to the diffusion-limited rate constants:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M49" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reaction distance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the Avogadro number, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the mutual diffusion coefficient of reactants. The
branching ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was determined by the following equation:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the rate constant of each pathway, and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sum of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value for each parallel pathway. A detailed
description of the kinetics is provided in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Ion-mediated initial reaction of GL</title>
      <p id="d1e816">The ion-mediated initial reactions of GL proceed via either proton-mediated
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>1) or hydroxyl ion (OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)-mediated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>1) hydration
(Figs. 1a and S1a in the Supplement), yielding cationic (CIs) or anionic intermediates (AIs).
As discussed in the Supplement, no TS is identified by PPC scanning for all pathways in
ion-mediated reactions (Fig. S2a in the Supplement); that is, all ion-mediated pathways are
barrierless processes unless otherwise stated. Figure 2 presents the natural
population analysis of key species using the natural bond orbital (NBO) method (Glendening et al., 2011), and Fig. S3 in the Supplement lists the optimized
geometries of all SPs. From a geometrical point of view, GL belongs to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> point group, and the positions of two carbonyl groups are
equivalent. The two carbonyl O-atoms and C-atoms exhibit the most negative
and positive natural charges of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.532 and 0.383 e, respectively,
indicating that the proton- and OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-mediated reactions of GL start from
carbonyl groups.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e891">PES of the GL oligomerization without MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM (in kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>):
<bold>(a)</bold> the initial reactions of GL and <bold>(b)</bold> the subsequent oligomerization to
dimers and trimers. The number denotes the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
reaction.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/7259/2022/acp-22-7259-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e938">The PESs of possible pathways in the ion-mediated reaction of GL are
presented in Figs. 1a and S1. For proton-meditated pathways (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>1),
protonation of carbonyl O-atom (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>11) is largely exothermic with a
reaction energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>96.9 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, to form the
CI11. Alternatively, protonation of GL can also be initiated by the
hydronium ion (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a barrierless process. As shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement, water protonation can provide the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>111.0 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and thus for the convenience of discussion, the
following proton-mediated pathways refer specially to the hydrogen ion
(H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)-initiated reactions. The nucleophilic attack of GL by OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>11) is also exothermic with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.4 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, to yield the AI11. The small exothermicity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>11 implies thermodynamically unfavorable formation of AI11. Table S1 in the Supplement lists the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>11 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>11 pathways as well as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1. Herein, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of the ion-initiated reactions (the sum of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>11 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>11 pathways) is 6.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>11 pathway contributes
30 % to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further, considering the moderately acidic
condition inside fine particles (Liu et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2012),
proton-mediated reaction of GL is of major significance in the troposphere,
and, thus, the subsequent reactions of CIs are mainly considered in the
following parts.</p>
      <p id="d1e1315">As shown in Fig. S3, the length of the C-O bond in CI11 is elongated to
1.24 Å, facilitating the subsequent hydration reaction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>12).
CI11 reacts via hydration and dehydration to yield diol (DL) with successive
increasing in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Subsequently, DL protonation occurs at the carbonyl
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>21-1) or hydroxyl (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>22-1) O-atom, leading to the formation
of tetrol (TL) and the first-generation carbenium ion (1st-CB1) (Figs. 1a and S1b). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>21-1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>22-1 pathways to form CI21-1 and
CI22-1 are also strongly exothermic with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>103.0 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>104.4 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The pathway for CI21-1 to
TL proceeds via hydration and deprotonation with successive increasing in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and the CI22-1 to 1st-CB1 reaction via
deprotonation corresponds to a slightly increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value,
suggesting that both TL and 1st-CB1 are the dominant intermediates.</p>
      <p id="d1e1499">As shown in Table S1, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>21-1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>22-1 pathways
are all 4.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and their half-lives (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
are lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated
using the formula, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rate
constant of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>21-1 or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>22-1 pathway and [H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] is the
concentration of the hydrogen ion (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M) in the weakly acidic
solution. It implies the rapid conversion from DL to TL and 1st-CB1, in
line with the experimental results showing that the abundance of GL monohydrate is
lower than 2 % in acidic conditions (Malik and Joens, 2000).
As discussed in the Supplement, it further confirms that the direct hydration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>2) and OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-mediated hydration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>1 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>2) are kinetically and thermodynamically hindered. Hence, the
cation-mediated initial reaction of GL, as the dominant route in the aqueous
phase, is mainly focused on and explored in the following study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Oligomerization mechanisms without methylamine\,$/$\,ammonia}?><title>Oligomerization mechanisms without methylamine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ammonia</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Dimerization</title>
      <p id="d1e1830">The dominant intermediates, TL and 1st-CB1, can subsequently conduct
electrostatic attraction with each other. As shown in Fig. S3, the C-O(H)
bond of 1st-CB1 after protonation is elongated by 0.05 Å relative
to the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O bond of GL, attributable to the presence of a carbenium ion
center. The natural charge of the carbenium ion center in 1st-CB1 is
0.547 e (Fig. 2), implying that it is liable to nucleophilic addition with
a negative natural charge center of TL via electrostatic attraction. All
possible pathways involved in nucleophilic addition between 1st-CB1 and
TL are constructed and depicted in Figs. 1b and S4a.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1842">The driving force for oligomerization
without and with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM: the natural bond orbitals of DL, TL, MA, AM, and CBs
(in e).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/7259/2022/acp-22-7259-2022-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1858">The nucleophilic addition of 1st-CB1 with TL (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>41) is an
exothermic process with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.7 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The subsequent hydration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>42) and deprotonation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>43) exhibit
a small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, to yield a
ring-opening dimer (ROD1) that has been identified under acidic condition
using thermal desorption-ion drift-chemical ionization mass spectrometry
(TD-ID-CIMS) (Y. Li et al., 2021). On the other hand, 1st-CB2 is
produced via protonation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>31) and dehydration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>32) of TL,
similar to the formation of 1st-CB1 (Fig. S1c). 1st-CB2 is also
attacked by TL (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>51) to form CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>51, which then proceeds via
hydration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>52) and deprotonation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>53) to yield ROD3 (Fig. S4b in the Supplement). An intermolecular isomerization pathway exists from ROD1 to ROD3 (R6,
Fig. S4c); that is, ROD3 can be formed from ROD1 via protonation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>61), hydration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>62 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>63), and deprotonation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>64), with the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>113.5 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As shown in Fig. 2, the natural charge of C-atom in 1st-CB2
is more positive than that in 1st-CB1, implying a stronger
electrostatic attraction between 1st-CB2 and TL. However, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>51 is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is higher than
that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>41 (Fig. S4a–b). It indicates that the reactivity of the
positive charge centers in carbenium ions is affected by both electrostatic
attraction and steric effect.</p>
      <p id="d1e2181"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The nucleophilic addition reaction of 1st-CBs with DL is also
illuminated and presented in Figs. 1b and S4a–b, although DL is not the most
dominant product in the aqueous-phase reaction of GL. Both ROD2 and ROD1
are generated from DL, respectively, through analogous pathways to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>4 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>5. As shown in Fig. 2, the hydroxyl O-atom in TL has a
larger negative natural charge than that in DL, implying that there is a
stronger electrostatic attraction between 1st-CBs and TL. In addition,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of association reactions of 1st-CBs with DL
are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.3 (for 1st-CB1) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 (for 1st-CB2) kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, which are less negative than those with TL. This indicates that
the most abundant dimers correspond to the oligomeric pathways arising from
1st-CBs with TL in weakly acidic condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Trimerization and oligomerization</title>
      <p id="d1e2255">Similar to the formation of 1st-CBs, as shown in Fig. 1b, the
ring-opening dimers then repeat protonation and dehydration to form six
second-generation carbenium ions (2nd-CBs) (Fig. S5 in the Supplement), which further
engage in the formation of cyclic dimers (CDs) or ring-opening trimers
(ROTs). Figures S6–S7 in the Supplement present the schematic energy diagram for the formation
of CDs and ROTs, and Fig. S8 in the Supplement depicts the optimized geometries of SPs
involved in the aforementioned pathways. In total, three CDs and nine ROTs
are produced and identified via R8–R20 routes, and the overall schematic
diagram is shown in Fig. 1b. For example, protonation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>81-1) and
dehydration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>81-2) of ROD1 yield 2nd-CB1, which undergoes
intramolecular isomerization to produce CI111 (R111). CI111 is
further hydrolyzed (R112) and deprotonated (R113) to yield CD1.
Alternatively, the association of 2nd-CB1 with TL and DL yields CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>151
and CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>151, respectively, and their subsequent pathways are similar to
the pathways of the formation of RODs, resulting in the formation of ROT1 and ROT2 (Fig. S7a). Current results reveal that cyclic oligomers are
difficult to be formed from the CBs with the positive charge center close to the
O(H) atom, such as 2nd-CB2 and 2nd-CB4 in Fig. 1b. Moreover, the
isomeric conversion can also occur among the nine ROTs via protonation,
hydration, and deprotonation processes (R21–R27 in Fig. S9 in the Supplement).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2308">The formation of 3rd-CBs from the
ring-opening trimers (in kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The value
represents the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of each
step reaction.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/7259/2022/acp-22-7259-2022-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2342">Similar to dimerization pathways, the nine ROTs further engage in
protonation and dehydration reactions to produce 25 third-generation carbenium ions (3rd-CBs) (R28–R36 in Fig. 3). In this
study, the configurations of oligomers with the lowest energies are applied
because many isomers of dimers and trimers can be yielded. Subsequently,
25 3rd-CBs undergo intramolecular isomerization, hydration,
and deprotonation to further yield 12 cyclic trimers (CTs) (Fig. S10 in the Supplement and
Table S2 in the Supplement). Based on kinetic rate calculations, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of dimer and
trimer formation are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
aqueous phase, limited by liquid-phase diffusion. It should be pointed out
that the rate constants of dimer and trimer formation obtained from our
theoretical calculations are distinct from those previously investigated by
Ervens and Volkamer (Ervens and Volkamer, 2010). The rate constants obtained in
this previous study are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for dimer and trimer formation based
on the direct nucleophilic addition between GL and GL or GL and GL hydrates.
Our protonation-initiated cationic oligomerization involves nucleophilic
addition of DL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TL to CBs, which is fast and barrierless.
Hence, the formation of various ring-opening or cyclic dimers and trimers is
initiated by protonation and subsequently propagated via the electrostatic
attraction, with the rate constants of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, ultimately contributing to SOA formation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Oligomerization mechanisms with methylamine\,$/$\,ammonia}?><title>Oligomerization mechanisms with methylamine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ammonia</title>
      <p id="d1e2502">As shown in Fig. 2, a strong electrostatic attraction exists between
1st-CBs and AM or MA because N-atoms exhibit large negative
natural charges (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.875 e for MA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.078 e for AM). Hence, the carbenium
ion-mediated oligomerization of GL with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM to form N-oligomers
is simulated and presented in Fig. 4. Figures S11–S12 depict the optimized
geometries of key SPs. Also, the involved cation-mediated pathways default
to barrierless processes unless stated (Fig. S2b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2528">The PES for formation of N-heterocycles starting from <bold>(a–b)</bold> 1st-CBs with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM to dimers, <bold>(c)</bold> dimers to
N-1st-CBs, and <bold>(d–e)</bold> N-1st-CBs
with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM to trimers (in kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The number
denotes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">‡</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each reaction step, and
all energies are relative to the corresponding reactants.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/7259/2022/acp-22-7259-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>The nucleophilic addition of 1st-CBs with MA</title>
      <p id="d1e2609">Attack of 1st-CBs by MA results in four N-containing ring-opening dimer
(N-ROD) formation. For example, such multistep processes of 1st-CB1
with MA are shown as the following (Fig. 4a–b):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M202" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">61</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">601</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">601</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">602</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">601</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">611</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">611</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">612</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">612</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">613</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">611</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
            For the association pathway of 1st-CB1 with MA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>601), the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>43.2 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>601, the length
of the formed C-N bond is 1.50 Å (Fig. S12a  in the Supplement). Unlike the
oligomerization without MA, the subsequent deprotonation of CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>601 is
difficult to be initiated by H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Fig. S13 in the Supplement, as discussed in the Supplement). It
implies that deprotonation from N-containing CIs needs to be initiated by
species with larger electronegativity than H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O. Taking into account the
real atmospheric conditions, in this study, deprotonation of the amino group
in CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>601 is initiated by SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>602). As shown in
Fig. S14 in the Supplement, the natural charge center of CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>601 is located at the amino
H-atom, which is readily abstracted by SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form
N-ROD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>602 pathway proceeds via a TS with the small
activation energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">‡</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A
pre-reactive complex (COM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>601) is identified prior to the TS and the
corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is lower
than that of the corresponding reactants. As illustrated in the Supplement, the
structure of COM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>601 is similar to that of the reactants, except for
the broken bonds. As shown in Fig. 4b, protonation of N-ROD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1 at the
hydroxyl group (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>611) yields CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>611 with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>122.8 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The subsequent dehydration of CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>611
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>612) possesses small exothermicity with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.7 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, to form CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>612. Similar to the subsequent
reaction of CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>601, deprotonation of CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>612 is also initiated by
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>613), to form the other N-ROD (N-ROD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2), with
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">‡</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.3 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, there
also exists an intermolecular isomerization pathway from N-ROD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2 to
N-ROD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>3 via protonation, hydration, and deprotonation (Fig. 4c):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M248" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">621</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">621</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">622</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">622</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">623</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">623</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">624</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3517">For the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>62 pathway, the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value for protonation,
hydration, and deprotonation of N-ROD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2 is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>108.1 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
yielding N-ROD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>3. N-ROD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>3 then repeats protonation and
dehydration to yield N-containing CBs (N-1st-CBs), which subsequently
engage in the nucleophilic addition with MA to form in sequence N-containing
ring-opening trimers, N-ROT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1 and N-ROT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2, (Fig. 4c–e):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex3"><mml:math id="M258" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">631</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">631</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">632</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CB</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">641</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">641</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">642</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">641</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROT</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">651</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">651</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">652</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">652</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">653</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">651</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROT</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3948">Subsequently, N-ROT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2 undergoes the nucleophilic addition with
1st-CBs rather than protonation, attributing to geometric
characteristics, i.e., no hydroxyl groups in N-ROT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2 to protonation
(Fig. S11 in the Supplement). For example, the reaction of N-ROT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2 with 1st-CB1 to
form N-heterocycles involves the following stepwise pathways (Fig. S15 in the Supplement):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex4"><mml:math id="M262" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROT</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">661</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">st</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CB</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">661</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">662</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">anti</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">syn</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">662</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">663</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">662</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">671</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">671</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">672</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TS</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">671</mml:mn><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4235">The nucleophilic addition of N-ROT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2 with 1st-CB1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>66) is
largely exothermic with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33.8 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
to overcome the barrier of subsequent intramolecular torsion and
H-abstraction pathways. The intramolecular torsion from CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>661 to
CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>662 proceeds via a TS, with the small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">‡</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of
5.1 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">‡</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of the H-abstraction
pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>663) is 18.4 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Subsequently, protonation of
N-IM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1 occurs at the hydroxyl group to form CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>671, which undergoes
dehydration via a TS, yielding an N-containing cyclic tetramer (N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1,
in Fig. S15). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">‡</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>672 are 17.3 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>89.4 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The
association reactions of 1st-CB2 with MA are also investigated and
discussed in the Supplement, via the similar stepwise pathways of 1st-CB1 with MA
(Figs. S16–S17), yielding an N-containing cyclic tetramer (N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2). The
intermolecular isomerization reaction from N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2 is
also observed (Fig. S18a in the Supplement). All N-containing dimers, trimers, and tetramers
subsequently contribute to N-heterocycles, which are the important
precursors of BrC aerosols. Because all deprotonation reactions proceed via
the corresponding TS in the presence of MA and their rate constants fall in
the range of (1.17–1.30) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S3),
deprotonation is the rate-limiting step to propagate N-heterocycles. It
implies that N-heterocycle formation is more dependent on the content of
inorganic compounds or inorganic salts in aerosol rather than on particle
acidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>The nucleophilic addition of 1st-CBs with AM</title>
      <p id="d1e4531">The carbenium ion-mediated reactions to N-heterocycles in the presence of AM
involve the stepwise processes (Figs. 4 and S15–S17), similar to the
nucleophilic addition of 1st-CBs with MA; that is, the formation of
N-heterocycles from GL with AM involves three vital steps (Fig. S19 in the Supplement): (1) the nucleophilic reaction of AM with CBs to form N-RODs, (2) protonation and
dehydration of N-RODs to yield N-containing CBs, and (3) the formation and
propagation of N-heterocycles by the association reactions of N-containing
CBs with AM. Alternatively, GL can be attacked by ammonium ion
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to produce CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>601 due to the equilibrium reaction
between AM and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in solution, with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a). CI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>601 engages in vital steps (2) and (3) to finally form N-heterocycles (N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1 and N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2).
Different from the case in the presence of MA, N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1 and N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2
can subsequently proceed with deprotonation to form N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>3 and N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>4
(Fig. S18b), respectively, because of the presence of H-atoms in amino
groups of N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1 and N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2 and the absence in N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1 and
N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>2. This explains that N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>3 and N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>4 are
identified in the presence of ammonium salts (such as
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Lee et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2011), while
N-CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>1 is observed in the presence of MA (De Haan et al.,
2009). Hence, the carbenium ion-mediated mechanism also provides a key
pathway for the formation of BrC from GL in the presence of ammonium salts.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e4755">Estimation of the rates for the oligomerization without and
with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM and the growth rates to SOA and BrC under different atmospheric
conditions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Environment</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">[GL]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(total)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col9" align="center">GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Without MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">With MA</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">With AM</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>SOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(MA)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(AM)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Urban</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (3.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.41 (1.44)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.44</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.45</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Remote</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28 (0.023)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.09</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.09</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rural</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.57 (0.032)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.18</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.18</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e4765"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Numbers are the typical measured values of GL from Cerqueira et al. (2003), Lawson et al. (2015), Qian et al. (2019), and Munger
et al. (1995).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The values are the rates of the oligomerization without and with
MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM (in s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(total) is the sum of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values without and
with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM. The values in parentheses are from Liggio et al. (2005a).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The values without and with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM are assumed as the growth rates
to SOA and to BrC, respectively. The values in parentheses are from Liggio et al. (2005a).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5379">Schematic diagram of formation and propagation of
oligomers in the absence of MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM. The inside circle ring
represents the ion-mediated initial reaction of GL to yield DL, TL, and
1st-CBs; the middle circle ring corresponds to the
formation of RODs and 2nd-CBs; the outer circle ring
denotes the formation and propagation of ROTs from the association reactions
of 2nd-CBs with DL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TL.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/7259/2022/acp-22-7259-2022-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Estimation of the heterogeneous GL reaction rates and growth rates of
SOA and BrC formation</title>
      <p id="d1e5411">To evaluate the atmospheric regions where the heterogeneous reaction of GL
will have significance, the heterogeneous GL reaction rates and the growth
rates of SOA and BrC formation (GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) are estimated under
rural, remote, and urban conditions using the predicted carbenium
ion-mediated reaction mechanism of GL mentioned earlier. First, the
heterogeneous GL reaction rates without or with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM were driven by the
expression as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M366" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas phase concentration under rural, remote, and urban
conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the calculated rate constant of protonation reaction (4.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the absence of MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM or
deprotonation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the
presence of MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the uptake coefficient of GL under the
urban condition.</p>
      <p id="d1e5608">The heterogeneous GL reaction rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(total)) is the sum of the
rates without and with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM. Table 1 lists the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> without and with
MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(total) under rural, remote, and urban conditions as well
as the available experimental data (Liggio et al., 2005a). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(total) values are 4.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 9.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 1.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under the three aforementioned conditions. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value under the urban condition almost agrees with
that of the experimental data and is slightly larger than the values of the
experimental data under other conditions (Liggio et al., 2005a).
The lower values under remote and rural conditions are explained by the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> used here, which is more suitable for the urban condition (Liggio et al., 2005a). Second, the growth rate (GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Ji
et al., 2020) is expressed as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M397" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">proton</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AWC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">proton</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the rate of GL
protonation given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rate of heterogeneous GL reaction without MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM (in
Table 1), and [H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] is the concentration of the hydrogen ion (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M) in the weakly acidic solution, and AWC is the aerosol water content (1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Ji et al., 2020). The GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is also calculated
using Eq. (5), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">proton</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is
replaced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">deproton</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e.,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M417" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GL</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AWC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>rate</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rate of heterogeneous GL reaction with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM, and
[SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] is the concentration of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M) in the weakly acidic solution. Considering that the
deprotonation occurs readily by acidic anions (e.g., SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the
GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values obtained in this study may be underestimated. The
GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values under the different atmospheric conditions are
also presented in Table 1. The GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is 1.41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
under the urban condition, which is larger than the GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for MA and 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for AM).
The total growth rate (the sum of the GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values) is also
consistent with the experimental data (1.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Liggio et al., 2005a). Hence, it is reasonable to expect the
occurrence of a carbenium ion-mediated mechanism in ambient aerosols as a
means of SOA and BrC formation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6372">This study provides valuable insight into the aqueous chemistry of GL and
also reveals the rate-limiting steps in the absence and presence of
MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM. In the absence of MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM (Fig. 5), the
cation-mediated oligomerization is characterized by barrierless pathways and
strong electrostatic attraction as follows: (I) protonation, hydration, and
deprotonation of GL to yield DL and TL, (II) protonation and dehydration to
yield CBs, and (III) the formation of dimers from the association reactions
of CBs with DL and TL. Each dimer repeats steps (II) and (III) to propagate
the oligomerization. In the presence of MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM, step (III)
starts from nucleophilic addition of CBs with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM rather than
with DL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TL due to the stronger electrostatic attraction between CBs and
MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM (Fig. 2). However, the key mechanistic step in the
propagation of N-heterocycles is deprotonation of N-containing cationic
intermediates. Our results of two distinct mechanisms indicate that BrC
formation is more dependent on the aerosol content of inorganic compounds or
inorganic salts rather than particle acidity, compared with the formation of
SOA.</p>
      <p id="d1e6418">On the other hand, there exist the competing pathways with the initial
protonation pathway for the cationic oligomerization of GL without and with
MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM, (i.e., the association reactions of CIs with OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
These competing pathways lead to CIs returning the corresponding
reactants and affect the fate of GL. Figure S20 and Table S1 present the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the association reactions for some key CIs
with OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Generally, the fate of CIs at each step is dominantly
determined by the initial protonation rather than the reaction with
OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of the association pathway
of CI11 with OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>66.8 kcal mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value is 1.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Compared with the protonation of GL
to CI11, this reaction is thermodynamically and kinetically unfavorable. The
branching ratios show that 70 % of GL proceeds via the protonation pathway to
finally form DL. Because protonation is favorable in the acidic aerosol, the
cation-mediated oligomerization of GL without and with MA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM can
efficiently proceed to contribute to SOA and BrC under the atmospheric
conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e6572">Using our predicted heterogeneous GL reaction rates, the aqueous
heterogeneous lifetime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of GL is estimated to be 3.60 min under
the urban conditions, somewhat shorter than that of experimental data (5.0 min)
(Liggio et al., 2005a). However, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are 89 and 61 min under
rural and remote conditions due to low GL levels, respectively (Liggio et
al., 2005a). It indicates a more important role of the aqueous heterogeneous
reaction of GL in urban air quality relative to other conditions. On the
other hand, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values determined here for rural, remote, and urban
conditions are all lower than those of the photolysis (211 min) and
photooxidation of GL (Liggio et al., 2005a). Especially, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value under the urban condition is significantly shorter than the total
gas-phase loss (125 min) (Liggio et al., 2005a). The results
indicate that even under relatively clean conditions, the heterogeneous GL
loss rates are faster than the loss rates due to other gas-phase processes
and are significantly rapid in polluted regions. Given that GL
contributes to 6.9 % of the total radical production at midday (Aiello, 2003), the heterogeneous GL loss to particles implies the
reduction of HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and demands further study. Our work reveals the
fundamental chemical mechanism of SOA and BrC formation from small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dicarbonyls and also provides the kinetic and mechanistic data for
atmospheric modeling to assess the budget of SOA and BrC formation on urban,
regional, and global scales.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6625">All raw data can be provided by the corresponding authors
upon request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6628">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7259-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7259-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6637">YJ and QS designed the research; YJ, QS, XM, LG, JW,
and YL performed the research; YJ, QS, XM, LG, JW, YL, YG, GL, RZ, and
TA analyzed the data; YJ and QS wrote the paper. YJ, XM, RZ, and TA
reviewed and edited the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6643">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e6649">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6655">This work was financially supported by National
Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42077189 and 4201001008),
Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (grant nos.
2019B151502064), Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong
Pearl River Talents Program (grant nos. 2017BT01Z032), and Science and
Technology Key Project of Guangdong Province, China (grant nos.
2019B110206002).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6661">This paper was edited by Yafang Cheng and reviewed by Deming Xia and two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Acosta Navarro, J. C., Smolander, S., Struthers, H., Zorita, E., Ekman, A.
M., Kaplan, J. O., Guenther, A., Arneth, A., and Riipinen, I.: Global
emissions of terpenoid VOCs from terrestrial vegetation in the last
millennium, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 6867–6885,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021238" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021238</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aiello, M.: An automated instrument for the quantitation of atmospheric
carbonyls: measurements and interpretation in southern ontario, Ph.D.
thesis, York Univ., Toronto, Ont., Canada, 256 pp., 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Altieri, K. E., Carlton, A. G., Lim, H. J., Turpin, B. J., and Seitzinger,
S. P.: Evidence for oligomer formation in clouds: reactions of isoprene
oxidation products, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4956–4960,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052170n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052170n</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Avzianova, E. and Brooks, S. D.: Raman spectroscopy of glyoxal oligomers in
aqueous solutions, Spectrochim. Acta., A, 101, 40–48,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2012.09.050" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.saa.2012.09.050</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cerqueira, M. A., Pio, C. A., Gomes, P. A., Matos, J. S., and Nunes, T. V.:
Volatile organic compounds in rural atmospheres of central Portugal, Sci. Total Environ., 313, 49–60,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-9697(03)00250-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0048-9697(03)00250-x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collins, F. C. and Kimball, G. E.: Diffusion-controlled reaction rates, J.
Colloid Sci., 4, 425–437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(49)90023-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0095-8522(49)90023-9</ext-link>,
1949.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Haan, D. O., Tolbert, M. A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Atmospheric
condensed-phase reactions of glyoxal with methylamine, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 36, L11819, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl037441" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009gl037441</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Haan, D. O., Hawkins, L. N., Jansen, K., Welsh, H. G., Pednekar, R., de Loera, A., Jimenez, N. G., Tolbert, M. A., Cazaunau, M., Gratien, A., Bergé, A., Pangui, E., Formenti, P., and Doussin, J.-F.: Glyoxal's impact on dry ammonium salts: fast and reversible surface aerosol browning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9581–9590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9581-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-9581-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ervens, B. and Volkamer, R.: Glyoxal processing by aerosol multiphase chemistry: towards a kinetic modeling framework of secondary organic aerosol formation in aqueous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8219–8244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A.,
Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji,
H., Caricato, M., Li, X., Hratchian, H. P., Izmaylov, A. F., Bloino, J., Zheng, G., Sonnenberg, J. L., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida,
M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Montgomery, J. A.,
Peralta Jr., J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E., Kudin, K. N.,
Staroverov, V. N., Keith, T., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell,
A., Burant, J. C., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Rega, N., Millam, J. M., Klene,
M. Knox, J. E., Cross, J. B., Bakken, V., Adamo, C., Jaramillo, J., Gomperts, R.,
Stratmann, R. E., Yazyev, O., Austin, A. J., Cammi, R., Pomelli, C., Ochterski, J. W.,
Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Zakrzewski, V. G., Voth, G. A., Salvador, P., Dannenberg,
J. J., Dapprich, S., Daniels, A. D., Farkas, Ö., Foresman, J. B., Ortiz, J. V., Cioslowski,
J., and Fox, D. J.: Gaussian09, Revision D.01,
Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT., USA, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, T. M., Jacob, D. J., Wittrock, F., Burrows, J. P., Vrekoussis, M., and
Henze, D. K.: Global budgets of atmospheric glyoxal and methylglyoxal, and
implications for formation of secondary organic aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D15303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009505" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd009505</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Galano, A. and Alvarez-Idaboy, J. R.: Guanosine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH radical reaction in
aqueous solution: A reinterpretation of the UV-vis data based on
thermodynamic and kinetic calculations, Org. Lett., 11, 5114–5117,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ol901862h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ol901862h</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Ji, Y., Li, G., and An, T.: Mechanism, kinetics and toxicity
assessment of OH-initiated transformation of triclosan in aquatic
environments, Water Res., 49, 360–370,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.027</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ge, M., Tong, S., Wang, W., Zhang, W., Chen, M., Peng, C., Li, J., Zhou, L.,
Chen, Y., and Liu, M.: Important oxidants and their impact on the
environmental effects of aerosols, J. Phys. Chem. A, 125, 3813–3825,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c10236" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.0c10236</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Glendening, E. D., Landis, C. R., and Weinhold, F.: Natural bond orbital
methods, Wires Comput. Mol. Sci., 2, 1–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.51" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wcms.51</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gomez Alvarez, E., Viidanoja, J., Munoz, A., Wirtz, K., and Hjorth, J.:
Experimental confirmation of the dicarbonyl route in the photo-oxidation of
toluene and benzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8362–8369,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0713274" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0713274</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gomez, M. E., Lin, Y., Guo, S., and Zhang, R.: Heterogeneous chemistry of
glyoxal on acidic solutions. An oligomerization pathway for secondary
organic aerosol formation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4457–4463,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509916r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp509916r</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guo, J., Wang, Y., Shen, X., Wang, Z., Lee, T., Wang, X., Li, P., Sun, M.,
Collett, J. L., Wang, W., and Wang, T.: Characterization of cloud water
chemistry at Mount Tai, China: Seasonal variation, anthropogenic impact, and
cloud processing, Atmos. Environ., 60, 467–476,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.016</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hastings, W. P., Koehler, C. A., Bailey, E. L., and De Haan, D. O.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation by glyoxal hydration and oligomer
formation: humidity effects and equilibrium shifts during analysis, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 39, 8728–8735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es050446l" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es050446l</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hazra, M. K. and Sinha, A.: Formic acid catalyzed hydrolysis of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the gas phase: a barrierless mechanism for sulfuric acid production of
potential atmospheric importance, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 17444–17453,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207393v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja207393v</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, M. Q, Cai, S. Y., Liao, Y. M., Zhao, W. X., Hu, C. J., Wang, Z. Y.,
and Zhang, W. J.: Theoretical studies on mechanism and rate constant of gas
phase hydrolysis of glyoxal catalyzed by sulfuric acid, Chinese J. Chem.
Phys., 29, 335–343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1674-0068/29/cjcp1509193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1674-0068/29/cjcp1509193</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jang, M., Czoschke, N. M., Lee, S., and Kamens, R. M.: Heterogeneous
atmospheric aerosol production by acid-catalyzed particle-phase reactions,
Science, 298, 814–817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1075798</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ji, Y., Zhao, J., Terazono, H., Misawa, K., Levitt, N. P., Li, Y., Lin, Y.,
Peng, J., Wang, Y., Duan, L., Pan, B., Zhang, F., Feng, X., An, T.,
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Zhang, A. L., Shibuya, K., Molina, M. J.,
and Zhang, R.: Reassessing the atmospheric oxidation mechanism of toluene,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 8169–8174,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715304114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1715304114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ji, Y., Shi, Q., Li, Y., An, T., Zheng, J., Peng, J., Gao, Y., Chen, J., Li,
G., Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Zhang, A. L., Zhao, J., Molina, M. J., and Zhang,
R.: Carbenium ion-mediated oligomerization of methylglyoxal for secondary
organic aerosol formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117,
13294–13299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912235117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1912235117</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Varutbangkul, V., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Chamber studies of secondary organic aerosol growth by
reactive uptake of simple carbonyl compounds, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23207,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005jd006004</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kua, J., Hanley, S. W., and de Haan, D. O.: Thermodynamics and kinetics of
glyoxal dimer formation: A computational study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 66–72,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp076573g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp076573g</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kua, J., Krizner, H. E., and De Haan, D. O.: Thermodynamics and kinetics of
imidazole formation from glyoxal, methylamine, and formaldehyde: a
computational study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 115, 1667–1675,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp111527x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp111527x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawson, S. J., Selleck, P. W., Galbally, I. E., Keywood, M. D., Harvey, M. J., Lerot, C., Helmig, D., and Ristovski, Z.: Seasonal in situ observations of glyoxal and methylglyoxal over the temperate oceans of the Southern Hemisphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 223–240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-223-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-223-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, A. K., Zhao, R., Li, R., Liggio, J., Li, S. M., and Abbatt, J. P.:
Formation of light absorbing organo-nitrogen species from evaporation of
droplets containing glyoxal and ammonium sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
47, 12819–12826, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402687w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es402687w</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lian, X., Zhang, G., Yang, Y., Lin, Q., Fu, Y., Jiang, F., Peng, L., Hu, X.,
Chen, D., Wang, X., Peng, P. A., Sheng, G., and Bi, X.: Evidence for the
formation of imidazole from carbonyls and reduced nitrogen species at the
individual particle level in the ambient atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol.
Lett., 8, 9–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00722</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liggio, J., Li, S. M., and McLaren, R.: Reactive uptake of glyoxal by
particulate matter, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10304,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004jd005113</ext-link>, 2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liggio, J., Li, S. M., and McLaren, R.: Heterogeneous reactions of glyoxal
on particulate matter: identification of acetals and sulfate esters,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1532–1541, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es048375y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es048375y</ext-link>,
2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Han, Z., Sun, Y., Li, J., and Liang, L.: Chemical formation pathways
of secondary organic aerosols in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in
wintertime, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117996,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117996" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117996</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, L., Zhong, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Xu, J., Francisco, J. S., and Zeng,
X. C.: Unraveling nucleation pathway in methane clathrate formation, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 24701–24708,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011755117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2011755117</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lim, H. J., Carlton, A. G., and Turpin, B. J.: Isoprene forms secondary
organic aerosol through cloud processing: model simulations, Environl. Sci.
Technol., 39, 4441–4446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es048039h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es048039h</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ling, Z., Xie, Q., Shao, M., Wang, Z., Wang, T., Guo, H., and Wang, X.: Formation and sink of glyoxal and methylglyoxal in a polluted subtropical environment: observation-based photochemical analysis and impact evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11451–11467, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11451-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-11451-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, M., Yu, S., Tian, Z., Xu, Z., and Tong, Z.: Fine particle pH during
severe haze episodes in northern China, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 5213–5221,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL073210</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Ji, Y., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Shi, Q., Peng, J., Wang, Y., Wang, C.,
Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Seinfeld, J. H., and Zhang, R.: Unexpected
oligomerization of small alpha-dicarbonyls for secondary organic aerosol and
brown carbon formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 4430–4439,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c08066</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Loeffler, K. W., Koehler, C. A., Paul, N. M., and De Haan, D. O.: Oligomer
formation in evaporating aqueous glyoxal and methyl glyoxal solutions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 6318–6323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es060810w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es060810w</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lutnaes, O. B., Teale, A. M., Helgaker, T., Tozer, D. J., Ruud, K., and
Gauss, J.: Benchmarking density-functional-theory calculations of rotational
g tensors and magnetizabilities using accurate coupled-cluster calculations,
J. Chem. Phys., 131, 144104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3242081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.3242081</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, F., Xie, H., Li, M., Wang, S., Zhang, R., and Chen, J.: Autoxidation
mechanism for atmospheric oxidation of tertiary amines: Implications for
secondary organic aerosol formation, Chemosphere, 273, 129207,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129207</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Malik, M. and Joens, J. A.: Temperature dependent near-UV molar
absorptivities of glyoxal and gluteraldehyde in aqueous solution,
Spectrochim. Acta. A, 56, 2653–2658,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1386-1425(00)00311-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1386-1425(00)00311-5</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J., and Truhlar, D. G.: Universal solvation
model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the
solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 6378–6396, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp810292n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp810292n</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marrero-Ortiz, W., Hu, M., Du, Z., Ji, Y., Wang, Y., Guo, S., Lin, Y.,
Gomez-Hermandez, M., Peng, J., Li, Y., Secrest, J., Zamora, M. L., Wang, Y.,
An, T., and Zhang, R.: Formation and optical properties of brown carbon from
small alpha-dicarbonyls and amines, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 117–126,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b03995</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Maxut, A., Nozière, B., Fenet, B., and Mechakra, H.: Formation mechanisms
and yields of small imidazoles from reactions of glyoxal with NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in water at neutral pH, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 20416–20424,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp03113c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c5cp03113c</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Munger, J. W., Jacob, D. J., Daube, B. C., Horowitz, L. W., Keene, W. C.,
and Heikes, B. G.: Formaldehyde, glyoxal, and methylglyoxal in air and
cloudwater at a rural mountain site in central Virginia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 9325–9333, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Myriokefalitakis, S., Vrekoussis, M., Tsigaridis, K., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Brühl, C., Volkamer, R., Burrows, J. P., and Kanakidou, M.: The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4965–4981, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4965-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4965-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nozière, B., Dziedzic, P., and Córdova, A.: Products and
kinetics of the liquid-phase reaction of glyoxal catalyzed by ammonium ions
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 231–237,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8078293" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp8078293</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Okuno, Y.: Theoretical investigation of the mechanism of the baeyer-villiger
reaction in nonpolar solvents, Chem.-Eur. J., 3, 210–218,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.19970030208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/chem.19970030208</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Piccot, S. D.: A global inventory of volatile organic compound emissions
from anthropogenic sources, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 9897–9991,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92jd00682" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92jd00682</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Powelson, M. H., Espelien, B. M., Hawkins, L. N., Galloway, M. M., and De
Haan, D. O.: Brown carbon formation by aqueous-phase carbonyl compound
reactions with amines and ammonium sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
985–993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es4038325" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es4038325</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qian, X., Shen, H., and Chen, Z.: Characterizing summer and winter carbonyl
compounds in Beijing atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 214, 116845,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116845</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Raghavachari, K. and Trucks, G. W.: A fifth-order perturbation comparison of
electron correlation theories, Chem. Phys. Lett., 157, 479–483,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87395-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87395-6</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sareen, N., Carlton, A. G., Surratt, J. D., Gold, A., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Thornton, J. A., Zhang, Z., Lim, Y. B., and Turpin, B. J.: Identifying precursors and aqueous organic aerosol formation pathways during the SOAS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14409–14420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14409-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14409-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shapiro, E. L., Szprengiel, J., Sareen, N., Jen, C. N., Giordano, M. R., and McNeill, V. F.: Light-absorbing secondary organic material formed by glyoxal in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2289–2300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shi, G., Mahmood, A., Lu, G., Wang, X., Tong, S., Ge, M., Xie, X., and Sun,
J.: Adsorption and photodegradation of acetaldehyde and ethylene on
TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (001) surface: experimental and first principle studies, Catal.
Lett., 149, 2728–2738, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-019-02813-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10562-019-02813-8</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shi, Q., Zhang, W., Ji, Y., Wang, J., Qin, D., Chen, J., Gao, Y., Li, G.,
and An, T.: Enhanced uptake of glyoxal at the acidic nanoparticle interface:
implications for secondary organic aerosol formation, Environ. Sci.-Nano,
7, 1126–1135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0en00016g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d0en00016g</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst,
T. E., Edney, E. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of acidity on secondary
organic aerosol formation from isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
5363–5369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0704176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0704176</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tuguldurova, V. P., Fateev, A. V., Poleshchuk, O. K., and Vodyankina, O. V.:
Theoretical analysis of glyoxal condensation 495 with ammonia in aqueous
solution, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 21, 9326–9334,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp07270a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c8cp07270a</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Platt, U., and Wirtz, K.: Primary and secondary glyoxal
formation from aromatics: Experimental evidence for the bicycloalkyl-radical
pathway from Benzene, Toluene, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Xylene, J. Phys. Chem. A., 105,
7865–7874, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp010152w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp010152w</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., San Martini, F., Molina, L. T., Salcedo, D., Jimenez, J. L.,
and Molina, M. J.: A missing sink for gas-phase glyoxal in Mexico City:
Formation of secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19807,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl030752</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, S., Du, L., Tsona, N. T., Jiang, X., You, B., Xu, L., Yang, Z., and
Wang, W.: Effect of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the photooxidation of
methylglyoxal: Implications in secondary aerosol formation, J. Environ. Sci.
(China), 92, 151–162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.011</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Riva, M., Xie, H., Heikkinen, L., Schallhart, S., Zha, Q., Yan, C., He, X.-C., Peräkylä, O., and Ehn, M.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from chlorine-atom-initiated oxidation of alpha-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5145–5155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5145-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-5145-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xia, D., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Xu, T., Su, L., Xie, H., and Allen, D. T.:
Organic acid-ammonia ion-induced nucleation pathways unveiled by quantum
chemical calculation and kinetics modeling: a case study of
3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid, Chemosphere, 284, 131354,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131354</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, Z., Tsona, N. T., Li, J., Wang, S., Xu, L., You, B., and Du, L.:
Effects of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the secondary organic aerosol formation
from the photooxidation of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene: a new source of
organosulfates, Environ. Pollut., 264, 114742,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114742</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in aqueous ammonium sulfate solutions: products,
kinetics and hydration effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es200989n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es200989n</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y. and Truhlar, D. G.: The M06 suite of density functionals for main
group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions,
excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic
testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals, Theor. Chem.
Account., 120, 215–241, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ziemann, P. J. and Atkinson, R.: Kinetics, products, and mechanisms of
secondary organic aerosol formation, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6582–6605,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35122f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c2cs35122f</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Elucidating the critical oligomeric steps in secondary organic aerosol and brown carbon formation</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Acosta Navarro, J. C., Smolander, S., Struthers, H., Zorita, E., Ekman, A.
M., Kaplan, J. O., Guenther, A., Arneth, A., and Riipinen, I.: Global
emissions of terpenoid VOCs from terrestrial vegetation in the last
millennium, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 6867–6885,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021238" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021238</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aiello, M.: An automated instrument for the quantitation of atmospheric
carbonyls: measurements and interpretation in southern ontario, Ph.D.
thesis, York Univ., Toronto, Ont., Canada, 256 pp., 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Altieri, K. E., Carlton, A. G., Lim, H. J., Turpin, B. J., and Seitzinger,
S. P.: Evidence for oligomer formation in clouds: reactions of isoprene
oxidation products, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4956–4960,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052170n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052170n</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Avzianova, E. and Brooks, S. D.: Raman spectroscopy of glyoxal oligomers in
aqueous solutions, Spectrochim. Acta., A, 101, 40–48,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2012.09.050" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2012.09.050</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cerqueira, M. A., Pio, C. A., Gomes, P. A., Matos, J. S., and Nunes, T. V.:
Volatile organic compounds in rural atmospheres of central Portugal, Sci. Total Environ., 313, 49–60,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-9697(03)00250-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-9697(03)00250-x</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Collins, F. C. and Kimball, G. E.: Diffusion-controlled reaction rates, J.
Colloid Sci., 4, 425–437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(49)90023-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(49)90023-9</a>,
1949.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>De Haan, D. O., Tolbert, M. A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Atmospheric
condensed-phase reactions of glyoxal with methylamine, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 36, L11819, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl037441" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl037441</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>De Haan, D. O., Hawkins, L. N., Jansen, K., Welsh, H. G., Pednekar, R., de Loera, A., Jimenez, N. G., Tolbert, M. A., Cazaunau, M., Gratien, A., Bergé, A., Pangui, E., Formenti, P., and Doussin, J.-F.: Glyoxal's impact on dry ammonium salts: fast and reversible surface aerosol browning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9581–9590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9581-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9581-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Ervens, B. and Volkamer, R.: Glyoxal processing by aerosol multiphase chemistry: towards a kinetic modeling framework of secondary organic aerosol formation in aqueous particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8219–8244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8219-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A.,
Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji,
H., Caricato, M., Li, X., Hratchian, H. P., Izmaylov, A. F., Bloino, J., Zheng, G., Sonnenberg, J. L., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida,
M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Montgomery, J. A.,
Peralta Jr., J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E., Kudin, K. N.,
Staroverov, V. N., Keith, T., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell,
A., Burant, J. C., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Rega, N., Millam, J. M., Klene,
M. Knox, J. E., Cross, J. B., Bakken, V., Adamo, C., Jaramillo, J., Gomperts, R.,
Stratmann, R. E., Yazyev, O., Austin, A. J., Cammi, R., Pomelli, C., Ochterski, J. W.,
Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Zakrzewski, V. G., Voth, G. A., Salvador, P., Dannenberg,
J. J., Dapprich, S., Daniels, A. D., Farkas, Ö., Foresman, J. B., Ortiz, J. V., Cioslowski,
J., and Fox, D. J.: Gaussian09, Revision D.01,
Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT., USA, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Fu, T. M., Jacob, D. J., Wittrock, F., Burrows, J. P., Vrekoussis, M., and
Henze, D. K.: Global budgets of atmospheric glyoxal and methylglyoxal, and
implications for formation of secondary organic aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D15303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009505" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009505</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Galano, A. and Alvarez-Idaboy, J. R.: Guanosine + OH radical reaction in
aqueous solution: A reinterpretation of the UV-vis data based on
thermodynamic and kinetic calculations, Org. Lett., 11, 5114–5117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ol901862h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ol901862h</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Galloway, M. M., Chhabra, P. S., Chan, A. W. H., Surratt, J. D., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal uptake on ammonium sulphate seed aerosol: reaction products and reversibility of uptake under dark and irradiated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3331–3345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3331-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Ji, Y., Li, G., and An, T.: Mechanism, kinetics and toxicity
assessment of OH-initiated transformation of triclosan in aquatic
environments, Water Res., 49, 360–370,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.027</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ge, M., Tong, S., Wang, W., Zhang, W., Chen, M., Peng, C., Li, J., Zhou, L.,
Chen, Y., and Liu, M.: Important oxidants and their impact on the
environmental effects of aerosols, J. Phys. Chem. A, 125, 3813–3825,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c10236" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c10236</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Glendening, E. D., Landis, C. R., and Weinhold, F.: Natural bond orbital
methods, Wires Comput. Mol. Sci., 2, 1–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.51" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.51</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gomez Alvarez, E., Viidanoja, J., Munoz, A., Wirtz, K., and Hjorth, J.:
Experimental confirmation of the dicarbonyl route in the photo-oxidation of
toluene and benzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8362–8369,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0713274" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0713274</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gomez, M. E., Lin, Y., Guo, S., and Zhang, R.: Heterogeneous chemistry of
glyoxal on acidic solutions. An oligomerization pathway for secondary
organic aerosol formation, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 4457–4463,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509916r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509916r</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Guo, J., Wang, Y., Shen, X., Wang, Z., Lee, T., Wang, X., Li, P., Sun, M.,
Collett, J. L., Wang, W., and Wang, T.: Characterization of cloud water
chemistry at Mount Tai, China: Seasonal variation, anthropogenic impact, and
cloud processing, Atmos. Environ., 60, 467–476,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.016</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hastings, W. P., Koehler, C. A., Bailey, E. L., and De Haan, D. O.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation by glyoxal hydration and oligomer
formation: humidity effects and equilibrium shifts during analysis, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 39, 8728–8735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es050446l" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es050446l</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hazra, M. K. and Sinha, A.: Formic acid catalyzed hydrolysis of SO<sub>3</sub> in
the gas phase: a barrierless mechanism for sulfuric acid production of
potential atmospheric importance, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 17444–17453,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207393v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207393v</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Huang, M. Q, Cai, S. Y., Liao, Y. M., Zhao, W. X., Hu, C. J., Wang, Z. Y.,
and Zhang, W. J.: Theoretical studies on mechanism and rate constant of gas
phase hydrolysis of glyoxal catalyzed by sulfuric acid, Chinese J. Chem.
Phys., 29, 335–343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1674-0068/29/cjcp1509193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1674-0068/29/cjcp1509193</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Jang, M., Czoschke, N. M., Lee, S., and Kamens, R. M.: Heterogeneous
atmospheric aerosol production by acid-catalyzed particle-phase reactions,
Science, 298, 814–817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075798" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075798</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Ji, Y., Zhao, J., Terazono, H., Misawa, K., Levitt, N. P., Li, Y., Lin, Y.,
Peng, J., Wang, Y., Duan, L., Pan, B., Zhang, F., Feng, X., An, T.,
Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Zhang, A. L., Shibuya, K., Molina, M. J.,
and Zhang, R.: Reassessing the atmospheric oxidation mechanism of toluene,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 8169–8174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715304114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715304114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ji, Y., Shi, Q., Li, Y., An, T., Zheng, J., Peng, J., Gao, Y., Chen, J., Li,
G., Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Zhang, A. L., Zhao, J., Molina, M. J., and Zhang,
R.: Carbenium ion-mediated oligomerization of methylglyoxal for secondary
organic aerosol formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117,
13294–13299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912235117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912235117</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Ng, N. L., Murphy, S. M., Varutbangkul, V., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Chamber studies of secondary organic aerosol growth by
reactive uptake of simple carbonyl compounds, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006004</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kua, J., Hanley, S. W., and de Haan, D. O.: Thermodynamics and kinetics of
glyoxal dimer formation: A computational study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 66–72,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp076573g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp076573g</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Kua, J., Krizner, H. E., and De Haan, D. O.: Thermodynamics and kinetics of
imidazole formation from glyoxal, methylamine, and formaldehyde: a
computational study, J. Phys. Chem. A, 115, 1667–1675,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp111527x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp111527x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Lawson, S. J., Selleck, P. W., Galbally, I. E., Keywood, M. D., Harvey, M. J., Lerot, C., Helmig, D., and Ristovski, Z.: Seasonal in situ observations of glyoxal and methylglyoxal over the temperate oceans of the Southern Hemisphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 223–240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-223-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-223-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Lee, A. K., Zhao, R., Li, R., Liggio, J., Li, S. M., and Abbatt, J. P.:
Formation of light absorbing organo-nitrogen species from evaporation of
droplets containing glyoxal and ammonium sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
47, 12819–12826, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402687w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es402687w</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Lian, X., Zhang, G., Yang, Y., Lin, Q., Fu, Y., Jiang, F., Peng, L., Hu, X.,
Chen, D., Wang, X., Peng, P. A., Sheng, G., and Bi, X.: Evidence for the
formation of imidazole from carbonyls and reduced nitrogen species at the
individual particle level in the ambient atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol.
Lett., 8, 9–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00722" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00722</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Liggio, J., Li, S. M., and McLaren, R.: Reactive uptake of glyoxal by
particulate matter, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10304,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005113</a>, 2005a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Liggio, J., Li, S. M., and McLaren, R.: Heterogeneous reactions of glyoxal
on particulate matter: identification of acetals and sulfate esters,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1532–1541, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es048375y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es048375y</a>,
2005b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Han, Z., Sun, Y., Li, J., and Liang, L.: Chemical formation pathways
of secondary organic aerosols in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in
wintertime, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117996,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117996" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117996</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Li, L., Zhong, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Xu, J., Francisco, J. S., and Zeng,
X. C.: Unraveling nucleation pathway in methane clathrate formation, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 24701–24708,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011755117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011755117</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Lim, H. J., Carlton, A. G., and Turpin, B. J.: Isoprene forms secondary
organic aerosol through cloud processing: model simulations, Environl. Sci.
Technol., 39, 4441–4446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es048039h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es048039h</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Ling, Z., Xie, Q., Shao, M., Wang, Z., Wang, T., Guo, H., and Wang, X.: Formation and sink of glyoxal and methylglyoxal in a polluted subtropical environment: observation-based photochemical analysis and impact evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11451–11467, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11451-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11451-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Liu, M., Yu, S., Tian, Z., Xu, Z., and Tong, Z.: Fine particle pH during
severe haze episodes in northern China, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 5213–5221,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073210</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Ji, Y., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Shi, Q., Peng, J., Wang, Y., Wang, C.,
Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Seinfeld, J. H., and Zhang, R.: Unexpected
oligomerization of small alpha-dicarbonyls for secondary organic aerosol and
brown carbon formation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 4430–4439,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08066</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Loeffler, K. W., Koehler, C. A., Paul, N. M., and De Haan, D. O.: Oligomer
formation in evaporating aqueous glyoxal and methyl glyoxal solutions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 6318–6323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es060810w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es060810w</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lutnaes, O. B., Teale, A. M., Helgaker, T., Tozer, D. J., Ruud, K., and
Gauss, J.: Benchmarking density-functional-theory calculations of rotational
g tensors and magnetizabilities using accurate coupled-cluster calculations,
J. Chem. Phys., 131, 144104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3242081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3242081</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Ma, F., Xie, H., Li, M., Wang, S., Zhang, R., and Chen, J.: Autoxidation
mechanism for atmospheric oxidation of tertiary amines: Implications for
secondary organic aerosol formation, Chemosphere, 273, 129207,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129207</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Malik, M. and Joens, J. A.: Temperature dependent near-UV molar
absorptivities of glyoxal and gluteraldehyde in aqueous solution,
Spectrochim. Acta. A, 56, 2653–2658,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1386-1425(00)00311-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1386-1425(00)00311-5</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J., and Truhlar, D. G.: Universal solvation
model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the
solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 6378–6396, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp810292n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp810292n</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Marrero-Ortiz, W., Hu, M., Du, Z., Ji, Y., Wang, Y., Guo, S., Lin, Y.,
Gomez-Hermandez, M., Peng, J., Li, Y., Secrest, J., Zamora, M. L., Wang, Y.,
An, T., and Zhang, R.: Formation and optical properties of brown carbon from
small alpha-dicarbonyls and amines, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 117–126,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03995</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Maxut, A., Nozière, B., Fenet, B., and Mechakra, H.: Formation mechanisms
and yields of small imidazoles from reactions of glyoxal with NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in water at neutral pH, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 20416–20424,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp03113c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp03113c</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Munger, J. W., Jacob, D. J., Daube, B. C., Horowitz, L. W., Keene, W. C.,
and Heikes, B. G.: Formaldehyde, glyoxal, and methylglyoxal in air and
cloudwater at a rural mountain site in central Virginia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 9325–9333, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Myriokefalitakis, S., Vrekoussis, M., Tsigaridis, K., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Brühl, C., Volkamer, R., Burrows, J. P., and Kanakidou, M.: The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4965–4981, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4965-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4965-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Nozière, B., Dziedzic, P., and Córdova, A.: Products and
kinetics of the liquid-phase reaction of glyoxal catalyzed by ammonium ions
(NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 231–237,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8078293" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8078293</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Okuno, Y.: Theoretical investigation of the mechanism of the baeyer-villiger
reaction in nonpolar solvents, Chem.-Eur. J., 3, 210–218,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.19970030208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.19970030208</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Piccot, S. D.: A global inventory of volatile organic compound emissions
from anthropogenic sources, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 9897–9991,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92jd00682" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92jd00682</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Powelson, M. H., Espelien, B. M., Hawkins, L. N., Galloway, M. M., and De
Haan, D. O.: Brown carbon formation by aqueous-phase carbonyl compound
reactions with amines and ammonium sulfate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
985–993, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es4038325" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es4038325</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Qian, X., Shen, H., and Chen, Z.: Characterizing summer and winter carbonyl
compounds in Beijing atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 214, 116845,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116845</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Raghavachari, K. and Trucks, G. W.: A fifth-order perturbation comparison of
electron correlation theories, Chem. Phys. Lett., 157, 479–483,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87395-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87395-6</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sareen, N., Carlton, A. G., Surratt, J. D., Gold, A., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Mohr, C., Thornton, J. A., Zhang, Z., Lim, Y. B., and Turpin, B. J.: Identifying precursors and aqueous organic aerosol formation pathways during the SOAS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14409–14420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14409-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14409-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Shapiro, E. L., Szprengiel, J., Sareen, N., Jen, C. N., Giordano, M. R., and McNeill, V. F.: Light-absorbing secondary organic material formed by glyoxal in aqueous aerosol mimics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2289–2300, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Shi, G., Mahmood, A., Lu, G., Wang, X., Tong, S., Ge, M., Xie, X., and Sun,
J.: Adsorption and photodegradation of acetaldehyde and ethylene on
TiO<sub>2</sub> (001) surface: experimental and first principle studies, Catal.
Lett., 149, 2728–2738, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-019-02813-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-019-02813-8</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Shi, Q., Zhang, W., Ji, Y., Wang, J., Qin, D., Chen, J., Gao, Y., Li, G.,
and An, T.: Enhanced uptake of glyoxal at the acidic nanoparticle interface:
implications for secondary organic aerosol formation, Environ. Sci.-Nano,
7, 1126–1135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d0en00016g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d0en00016g</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst,
T. E., Edney, E. O., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of acidity on secondary
organic aerosol formation from isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41,
5363–5369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0704176" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0704176</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Tuguldurova, V. P., Fateev, A. V., Poleshchuk, O. K., and Vodyankina, O. V.:
Theoretical analysis of glyoxal condensation 495 with ammonia in aqueous
solution, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 21, 9326–9334,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp07270a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp07270a</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., Platt, U., and Wirtz, K.: Primary and secondary glyoxal
formation from aromatics: Experimental evidence for the bicycloalkyl-radical
pathway from Benzene, Toluene, and <i>p</i>-Xylene, J. Phys. Chem. A., 105,
7865–7874, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp010152w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp010152w</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Volkamer, R., San Martini, F., Molina, L. T., Salcedo, D., Jimenez, J. L.,
and Molina, M. J.: A missing sink for gas-phase glyoxal in Mexico City:
Formation of secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030752" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030752</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S., Du, L., Tsona, N. T., Jiang, X., You, B., Xu, L., Yang, Z., and
Wang, W.: Effect of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> on the photooxidation of
methylglyoxal: Implications in secondary aerosol formation, J. Environ. Sci.
(China), 92, 151–162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.011</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Riva, M., Xie, H., Heikkinen, L., Schallhart, S., Zha, Q., Yan, C., He, X.-C., Peräkylä, O., and Ehn, M.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from chlorine-atom-initiated oxidation of alpha-pinene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5145–5155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5145-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5145-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Xia, D., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Xu, T., Su, L., Xie, H., and Allen, D. T.:
Organic acid-ammonia ion-induced nucleation pathways unveiled by quantum
chemical calculation and kinetics modeling: a case study of
3-methyl-1,2,3-butanetricarboxylic acid, Chemosphere, 284, 131354,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131354" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131354</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Z., Tsona, N. T., Li, J., Wang, S., Xu, L., You, B., and Du, L.:
Effects of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> on the secondary organic aerosol formation
from the photooxidation of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene: a new source of
organosulfates, Environ. Pollut., 264, 114742,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114742" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114742</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Yu, G., Bayer, A. R., Galloway, M. M., Korshavn, K. J., Fry, C. G., and
Keutsch, F. N.: Glyoxal in aqueous ammonium sulfate solutions: products,
kinetics and hydration effects, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 6336–6342,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es200989n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es200989n</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y. and Truhlar, D. G.: The M06 suite of density functionals for main
group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions,
excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic
testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals, Theor. Chem.
Account., 120, 215–241, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Ziemann, P. J. and Atkinson, R.: Kinetics, products, and mechanisms of
secondary organic aerosol formation, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6582–6605,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35122f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35122f</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
