<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-675-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Eight-year variations in atmospheric <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>radiocesium in Fukushima city</article-title><alt-title>Eight-year variations in atmospheric radiocesium in Fukushima city</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Eight-year variations in atmospheric radiocesium in Fukushima city}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Watanabe et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Watanabe</surname><given-names>Akira</given-names></name>
          <email>watamay1948@yahoo.co.jp</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff3 aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Kajino</surname><given-names>Mizuo</given-names></name>
          <email>kajino@mri-jma.go.jp</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3988-0565</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Ninomiya</surname><given-names>Kazuhiko</given-names></name>
          <email>ninomiya@rirc.osaka-u.ac.jp</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nagahashi</surname><given-names>Yoshitaka</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff8">
          <name><surname>Shinohara</surname><given-names>Atsushi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Faculty of Symbiotic Systems Science, Fukushima University, Fukushima,
Fukushima 960-1296, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Climate Change, Fukushima, Fukushima 960-0231, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Meteorological Research Institute (MRI), Japan Meteorological Agency
(JMA), <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0052, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba,
Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine (IREM), Hirosaki, Aomori
036-8564, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka
560-0043, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Institute for Radiation Sciences, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka
560-0043, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Faculty of Health Science, Osaka Aoyama University, Minoh, Osaka
562-8580, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Akira Watanabe (watamay1948@yahoo.co.jp), Mizuo Kajino (kajino@mri-jma.go.jp), and Kazuhiko Ninomiya (ninomiya@rirc.osaka-u.ac.jp)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>675</fpage><lpage>692</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>30</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e175">After the Fukushima nuclear accident, atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs measurements were taken in Fukushima city for
8 years, from March 2011 to March 2019. The airborne surface
concentrations and deposition of radiocesium (radio-Cs) were high in winter and low in
summer; these trends are the opposite of those observed in a contaminated
forest area. The effective half-lives of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the concentrations
and deposition before 2015 (0.754 and 1.30 years, respectively) were
significantly shorter than those after 2015 (2.07 and 4.69 years,
respectively), which was likely because the dissolved radio-Cs
was discharged from the local terrestrial ecosystems more rapidly than the
particulate radio-Cs. In fact, the dissolved fractions of precipitation were
larger than the particulate fractions before 2015, but the particulate
fractions were larger after 2016. X-ray fluorescence analysis suggested that
biotite may have played a key role in the environmental behavior of
particulate forms of radio-Cs after 2014. However, the causal relationship
between the seasonal variations in particle size distributions and the
possible sources of particles is not yet fully understood. The current study
also proposes an evaluation method of the consistency of a numerical model
for radio-Cs resuspension and suggests that improvements to the model are
necessary.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e214">We conducted measurements of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in Fukushima city for 8 years following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
(FDNPP) accident that occurred in March 2011 in order to understand the time
variations in and emission sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and to
propose effective ways to reduce atmospheric radioactivity. Among the
various radionuclides released to the environment, radiocesium (radio-Cs) is particularly
important due to its abundance in terrestrial ecosystems (the impacts of
other nuclides were negligibly small 100 d after the accident; Yoshimura
et al., 2020), long half-life (2.06 years for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and 30.17 years for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs), and bioaccumulation (accumulation in muscle tissues, with a
biological half-life of 30–150 d; WHO, 2001). Radio-Cs forms aerosols in
the air and is, therefore, efficiently deposited onto the ground surface by
precipitation (wet deposition) or under dry weather conditions (dry
deposition). Approximately 30 % of the radio-Cs released in March 2011
was deposited onto the ground surface in Japan; the aircraft-measured
deposition on the ground was 2.7 PBq for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs (NRA, 2012), and the
most updated estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs emissions by the Japan Atomic Energy
Agency is 10 PBq (Terada et al., 2020). The activity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the
environment was equivalent to that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in March 2011. Once
radio-Cs is deposited onto the ground surface, it circulates within local
terrestrial ecosystems, so the discharge from the local environment to
downstream or downwind regions is not expected to be significant: 0.02 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.3 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to rivers (Iwagami et al., 2017) or approximately 1 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d1e345">The annual resuspension rate to the
atmosphere was estimated as 0.047 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by Kajino et al. (2016).
However, the current study found that the resuspension rate was likely
substantially underestimated (see Sect. 3.5 and Fig. 9). A value of
approximately 1 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained from improved simulations, but
that paper is still in preparation.</p></fn>. Thus, long-term monitoring of
atmospheric radio-Cs at even one station may allow us to understand the
mechanisms of its circulation in the local terrestrial ecosystems, to
estimate the external and inhalation exposure risks to the local residents,
to propose efficient ways to reduce health risks to the residents, and to
assess the effectiveness of decontamination efforts.</p>
      <p id="d1e373">To date, a great number of studies have focused on the circulation of
radio-Cs in terrestrial ecosystems (Onda et al., 2020). In terms of the
long-term monitoring of atmospheric radio-Cs with a focus on resuspension
from the ground surface to the atmosphere, several papers have been
published and are outlined in the following. Based on atmospheric measurements taken in the
contaminated forest area of the Abukuma Highlands (30 km northwest of the
FDNPP) from October 2012 to December 2014, Ochiai et al. (2016) reported
that the airborne surface concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs were higher in summer
and lower in winter and that the time variations in the fine mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in diameter using an impactor) and coarse mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) behaved differently: the coarse-mode fractions were larger in
summer, and the fine-mode fractions were larger in winter. Kinase et al. (2018) conducted concentration measurements at four locations in the forest
area of the Abukuma Highlands from July 2011 to March 2014 and found that
the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs were lower in winter and
early spring and higher from late spring to autumn. Their size-resolved
measurements with a six-stage cascade impactor showed that the backup filter
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations were high in winter, consistent with
Ochiai et al. (2016). However, using scanning
electron microscopy (SEM), Kinase et al. (2018) found that there were significant amounts of soil dust
particles in the backup filter; these particles were larger but bounced off
the upper impactor stages. Therefore, they concluded that the sizes of
radioactive particles were not small but were actually large (coarse-mode
particles). In late spring, the concentrations were positively correlated
with the wind speed, so they concluded that the wind-blown soil particles
carried radio-Cs in this season. In the summer and autumn, the
concentrations were positively correlated with temperature but negatively
correlated with wind speed, so they concluded that the resuspension
mechanisms were different in the winter and summer. The SEM analysis
revealed that there were more abundant bioaerosols in summer than in winter.
Based on simulations, Kaijno et al. (2016) indicated that the summer peaks
in concentrations in the Abukuma Highlands could be accounted for by
bioaerosol emissions from forest ecosystems, even though the emission
mechanism remains unknown. Igarashi et al. (2019a) further investigated the
mechanisms of bioaerosol emissions in forests in summer using fluorescent
optical microscopic observation and high-throughput DNA sequencing
techniques. They suggested that the fungal spores that accumulate radio-Cs
may be significantly involved in resuspension in the forest in summer. Kita
et al. (2020) suggested that rain induced the emission of radio-Cs
associated with fungal spores in the forest in summer. Minami et al. (2020)
combined aerosol flux measurements and a multilayer
atmosphere–soil–vegetation model and estimated that the bioaerosol emission
flux was on the order of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which could
account for the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the forests in summer
(Kajino et al., 2016; Kinase et al., 2018; Igarashi et al., 2019a). Kinase
et al. (2018) also showed that there was no enhancement in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs
concentration associated with forest fire events in the region. The
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs was not correlated with that of levoglucosan,
which is often used as a marker of biomass burning. Certainly, it is not
indicated that the forest fire did not reemit radio-Cs, as
wildfire in fact played a key role in the migration of radio-Cs in the Chernobyl
case (Ager et al., 2019; Igarashi et al., 2020). The contributions of
additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs emissions from the nuclear reactor buildings of FDNPP
to the concentrations in Japan were negligibly small compared with
resuspension from the ground surface (Kajino et al., 2016). On the other
hand, unintentional emissions on the premises of the FDNPP, such as debris
removal operations, contributed to some observed sporadic peaks (Steinhauser
et al., 2015; Kajino et al., 2016), although the impacts of such events
might be small in terms of long-term averages and trends.</p>
      <p id="d1e541">The current study is distinct from other studies, as it includes long-term
comprehensive measurements (time-resolved and size-resolved measurements of
airborne surface concentrations as well as measurements of dissolved and
particulate forms of activity in precipitation) at an urban/rural location
in the Fukushima Basin in the vicinity of contaminated forests in the
Abukuma Highlands. The field observation and the simulation methods are
described in Sect. 2. Section 3 presents the results for the concentrations
(Sect. 3.1), deposition amounts (Sect. 3.2), size distribution (Sect. 3.3),
chemical compositions (Sect. 3.4), comparison with simulations (Sect. 3.5),
and comparison with measurements taken outside Fukushima Prefecture (Sect. 3.6). The seasonal variations<?pagebreak page677?> and possible emission sources are discussed in
Sect. 4.1, the impacts of decontamination and natural variations on the
differences in trends before and after approximately 2015 are discussed in
Sect. 4.2, the reasons for the substantial deposition amount in January in
Fukushima city are discussed in Sect. 4.3, and major findings and future
issues are summarized in Sect. 5. The observation data used in the study are
provided as a Microsoft Excel file in the Supplement.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e547">Map of Fukushima Prefecture and the surrounding
prefectures. The locations mentioned in this study and the terrestrial
elevations are depicted on the map.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sampling site</title>
      <p id="d1e571">The observation site, Fukushima University, is located in Fukushima city, in
the northernmost basin (Fukushima Basin) in the Nakadori Valley, surrounded
by the Ou Mountains to the west and the Abukuma Highlands to the east (Fig. 1). The distance of the observation site from the FDNPP is approximately 60 km. The Nakadori Valley was formed by the Abukuma River, which starts in the
mountains in Fukushima Prefecture near the border of Tochigi Prefecture and
flows northeast through the central parts of Fukushima city to the Pacific
Ocean in Miyagi Prefecture. The major radioactive plumes arrived twice in
Fukushima city, on 15 and 20 March (plume no. 3 and no. 8, as identified by
Nakajima et al., 2017, respectively). These plumes were transported over
the Abukuma Highlands (where the summits are mostly lower than 1000 m) but
were blocked by the higher Ou Mountains (summits are 1000–2000 m) and,
thus, transported along the Nakadori Valley (Nakajima et al., 2017). The land
surface of Fukushima city was contaminated mainly on the afternoon of
15 March by plume no. 3. The air dose rate in Fukushima city started to increase
at 17:00 LT (local time), associated with the weak rain that started at
13:00 LT, and peaked at 19:30 LT at a value of 24.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sv</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Airborne surface concentrations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>High-volume air sampler, cascade impactor, and radioactivity
measurement</title>
      <p id="d1e608">The air samples were collected using high-volume air samplers (Model-120SL, Kimoto
Electric Co., Ltd.) placed on the roof of the building at
Fukushima University (37.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 140.45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) at a height
of 25 m above ground level. In this study, we carried out two types of air
sampling: time-resolved observations and aerosol size-resolved observations.
In the former case, aerosol samples were collected on a quartz fiber filter
(TE-QMA-100, Tisch Environmental, Inc.). The air suction rate of the sampler
was 700 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The typical duration of each sample collection was 24 h, from  8 May to 2 September 2011. We then switched to 72 h of
collection until 27 December 2017; after that, 1 week of continuous
collection was performed until 28 March 2019. For the latter observations,
a cascade impactor system (HV-RW, Sibata Scientific Technology Ltd.) was
placed into a high-volume air sampler. The air suction rate was 566 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The aerosols were collected separately by diameter on six quartz
filters (TE-236, Kimoto
Electric Co., Ltd.). The 50 % cut of particle size ranges in this
system was 0.39–0.69, 0.69–1.3, 1.3–2.1, 2.1–4.2, 4.2–10.2, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Fine particles with a size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
captured on a backup filter (TE-230-QZ, Kimoto
Electric Co., Ltd.). The typical sample
collection time for the size-resolved observations was 3 weeks. In both types
of observations, activated carbon fiber filters (KF-1700F 84 mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Toyobo Co., Ltd.) were also placed at the exit of the high-volume
air samplers to collect volatile or semi-volatile compounds.</p>
      <p id="d1e701">The collected aerosol samples were sealed into polyethylene bags at
Fukushima University. After being shaped into definite shapes, the gamma
rays from the samples were measured by high-purity germanium detectors
(coaxial with 15 %, 35 %, and 40 % relative efficiencies, SEIKO EG&amp;G ORTEC,
and coaxial with 40 % and 60 % relative efficiencies, CANBERRA) connected
to a multichannel analyzer system (MCA7600, SEIKO EG&amp;G) at the
Radioisotope Research Center, Osaka University. The radioactivities of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs were identified at gamma-ray intensities of 605 and 662 keV, respectively. The detection efficiencies of the respective
detectors for each gamma ray were determined from the same-shape filter
samples from standard <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs solutions obtained from the
Japan Radioisotope Association. The typical measurement time of each sample
was 1–3 d. Under these conditions, the detection limits of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs were approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Bq. The errors in the
measured values are derived from the systematic error of geometrical
configuration and the standard sample itself in addition to statistical
error. All radioactivities determined by our measurements were corrected at
mid-sampling times.</p>
      <p id="d1e777">The radioactivities of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs were identified for
most filter samples. The deviation in concentration between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs became larger over time due to the relatively short half-life of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs. According to the<?pagebreak page678?> radioactive decay correction performed in March 2011, the activity ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cs</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were approximately 1.
These ratios are consistent with those in other reports related to the FDNPP
accident, so we concluded that the detected radio-Cs originated from the
abovementioned event. During the measurement period, no radioactivity from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs was detected from the carbon filters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Impactor–cyclone system</title>
      <p id="d1e871">As the filters for the high-volume air samples were quartz fiber filters,
they could not be used for elemental analysis with X-ray fluorescence (XRF)
spectrometry. For the XRF analysis, we used an impactor–cyclone system
(no number, special order, 1100 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Tokyo Dylec Corp.) in which the
aerosols were separated by size into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using an impactor; those <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosols were sampled in glass bottles (2-4999-07, As One corp.) using a 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone with sampling intervals of 1 month from September 2014 to January 2018. Aerosols larger than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were collected on quartz fiber filters in the system; thus, only the
fine-mode particles in the glass bottles were measured by XRF. Aerosol
samples in glass bottles (0.1–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were defined as fine-mode PM
(PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and those on quartz fiber filters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
were defined as coarse-mode PM (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The radioactivities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the samples were also measured in the same manner.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Possible artifacts of impactor measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1042">Size separation by an impactor is associated with artifacts caused by
bouncing effects. In fact, in cascade impactor measurements, Kinase et al. (2018) observed abundant coarse-mode particles such as mineral dust and
bioaerosol particles in the backup filters due to bouncing effects. In the
impactor–cyclone system, the glass fiber filters used as an impaction
surface were immersed in silicone oil to prevent particles from bouncing
(Okuda et al., 2015). In this study, silicone oil was not used for the
cascade impactor but was used in the impactor–cyclone system. However, the
long-duration measurements (such as the monthlong measurements) could be
associated with larger particles that rebounded at the impactor and were
collected in glass bottles (Okuda et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Deposition (dry plus wet deposition, dissolved and particulate
fractions)</title>
      <p id="d1e1054">The total deposition (dry plus wet deposition or fallout) samples were
collected with a precipitation sampler (RS-20, Miyamoto Riken Ind. Co., Ltd.) with a funnel diameter of 20 cm. As a heating device was not
installed on the sampler, any snow in the funnel was manually melted in a
water bath in winter. The accumulated snow in the funnel never reached the
top of the funnel during the whole observation period. A filtration device
was installed in the sampler using membrane filters (4-880-03, Advantec)
with a pore size of 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The radioactivities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the filtered water stored in the polyethylene bottle and those
on the filters were both measured using high-purity germanium detectors at
Fukushima University and were defined as the dissolved and particulate
fractions of the deposition, respectively. It should be noted here that this
separation does not perfectly differentiate between water-soluble and insoluble
radio-Cs. The clogging of the pores of the membrane filter can occur during
filtration. The measured total (dissolved plus particulate) deposition
amounts were compared with those measured using the official method of Japan
(MEXT, 1976) at the Fukushima Prefecture Nuclear Power Center (Fig. 1),
which is located 6.5 km north-northwest of Fukushima University. Our method
was found to be consistent with their official method: the correlation
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.81, with a slope of 1.16 (the values from Fukushima
University were 16 % larger). Differences in locations and sampling
intervals (daily at the Fukushima Prefecture Nuclear Power Center and monthly
at Fukushima University) could also have contributed to the differences in
the measured values at the two sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>X-ray fluorescence analysis (aerosols, deposition, and river sediments)</title>
      <p id="d1e1100">X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was carried out using a RIX1000 (Rigaku
Corp.) at Fukushima University. The measurement setup recommended by the
manufacturer was used for the XRF. The major and trace element contents were
analyzed by the fundamental parameter method and calibration curve method,
respectively (Takase and Nagahashi, 2007). Measurements were conducted for
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. 2.2.2), the particulate fractions of precipitation (see
Sect. 2.3), and the river sediments. River sediments that characterize the
surface soils of the Nakadori Valley were also measured to assess the
composition correlations with the airborne and deposition samples. River
sediments were collected at 15 sites upstream and downstream of Fukushima
city in the Abukuma River and its tributaries in 2010. Samples were taken
from the gravel layer of the lower terrace at five sites, from alluvial fan
deposits at one site, and from current riverbed sediments at nine sites. The
dried sediment samples were sieved and divided into two grain size groups:
particles smaller than 180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (defined as fine sediment particles) and
particles 180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2 mm (coarse sediment particles).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Numerical simulation and validation data</title>
      <p id="d1e1141">Kajino et al. (2016) used a Lagrangian model (LM) to simulate the
atmospheric dispersion and deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs resuspended from bare
soil and forest ecosystems from<?pagebreak page679?> January to December 2013. As the
resuspension fluxes and size distributions were unknown, they adjusted the
flux from bare soil (forest ecosystems) so that the simulated airborne
surface concentrations matched those measured in Namie (Tsushima; Namie
High School, Tsushima Campus; 37.56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 140.77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 30 km
northwest of the FDNPP) (Fig. 1) in the winter (summer) of 2013, and they
adjusted the dry and wet deposition parameters (reflecting the size
distributions and hygroscopicity) so that the simulated total (dry plus wet)
deposition over land in March 2011 matched those measured by the aircraft
measurements (NRA, 2012). Thus, note that the size distribution of the
simulation was assumed to have submicron size ranges that were consistent
with those of the primary emissions (the direct emissions associated with
the FDNPP accident in March 2011) but that may not be applicable for
resuspension events; the carrier aerosols are presumed to be soil dust or
bioaerosols, which are usually in the supermicron size range. Kajino et al. (2016) concluded that their simulations are likely reliable because the
simulated differences between the concentrations in the contaminated area
(or emission source area) (i.e., Tsushima) and those in the downwind area
(Meteorological Research Institute, MRI; Tsukuba city; 36.06<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
140.13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 170 km southwest of the FDNPP) (Fig. 1) were consistent
with the observed differences at the two locations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1189">However, Kajino et al. (2016) used only concentration measurements to
validate the simulations. The current study also used concentration and
deposition measurements from Fukushima University for model validation. The
previous study compared only the two locations in the contaminated forest
areas and in the downwind urban/rural regions; the current study includes an
additional location in the urban/rural region near the contaminated forest
of the Abukuma Highlands (60 km northwest of the FDNPP).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Airborne surface concentrations</title>
      <p id="d1e1208">Figure 2 shows the time variations in the airborne surface concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs from May 2011 to March 2019. Just after the accident, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs concentrations were higher than 0.01 Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the maximum
concentration of 0.0169 Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was detected on 23 May 2011. The
concentration quickly decreased to a level of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the
minimum concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was obtained
on 5 December 2018.</p>
      <p id="d1e1308">It is remarkable that the decreasing tendencies in the earlier stage and the
later stage were different. The regression lines of the raw data time
intervals for the whole period (red; May 2011–March 2019), the earlier
stage (blue; May 2011–December 2014), and the later stage (lime; January 2015–March 2019) are shown in Fig. 2, with the half-life (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in days
and the decrease rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in percent per year. The decreasing tendency
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.753</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">92.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the earlier stage is
approximately 3 times faster than that of the later stage (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This is shown later in Fig. 3 in
Sect. 3.2 and discussed in Sect. 4.2, but it could be related to the
relative abundance of the particulate and dissolved fractions of radio-Cs in the
environment. The dissolved fractions of radio-Cs may discharge faster than
the particulate fractions from contaminated environments, such as soils and
plants. The relative abundance of the dissolved fractions was larger in the
earlier stage than in the later stage such that the decreasing tendency in
the concentration was faster than that in the later stage. In addition to
the natural variability, decontamination work, which was completed by March 2018 in Fukushima city and the surrounding municipalities, may also have
contributed to the difference in the decrease rates; this possibility is
also discussed in Sect. 4.2.</p>
      <p id="d1e1418">The regression analysis is also performed over different time periods, but
the results are not substantially different. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before
December 2013, 2014, and 2015 are 0.670, 0.753, and 0.900 years, and 103 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 92.0 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and 77.0 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after January 2014, 2015, and 2016 are 2.05, 20.7, and 2.56 years, and 33.8 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 33.5 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 27.1 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1541">Time series of airborne surface concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs on the left axis. The red, blue, and lime lines indicate the
regression lines of the whole period, before 2015, and after 2015,
respectively. The half-lives (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and decay rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are also
depicted. The gray line indicates the ratio of the running mean of 20 data
points (an approximate monthly cycle) to the running mean of 160 data
points (an approximate annual cycle) on the right axis to show its
seasonal variation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1581">It is also interesting that our data show different seasonal variations from
those measured in Tsushima by Ochiai et al. (2016) and Kinase et al. (2018).
The levels in their studies were high in summer and low in winter; however, as
depicted by the gray line in Fig. 2, the concentration in this work rose starting in
October, with maxima in the spring season around March and minima in the
summer. The maxima in the spring are approximately 1 order of magnitude
larger than the minima in the summer. The measurements of their studies were
conducted in high-dose areas in the mountain forest (approximately 400 m a.s.l., above sea level), and the high-volume samplers were set near the
ground surface. In contrast, the current air sampling was conducted in a
relatively low-dose area (10 times lower than that in Tsushima) located in
an urban/rural region on a hill (approximately 200 m a.s.l.) at the southern
end of the Fukushima Basin. The heights of the samples were 25 m from the
ground surface. Such geographical and altitude differences could have caused
these differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Deposition amounts</title>
      <p id="d1e1592">Figure 3 shows the monthly cumulative deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs from March 2011 to March 2019. The monthly deposition amount peaked in March 2011 at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, decreased to 1 % of the initial amount after
1 year, and decreased to an order of 1 Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after 8 years. It
also showed seasonal variation and was high from winter to spring.
Nevertheless, the current level is 2–3 orders of magnitude
larger than that before the Fukushima nuclear accident.</p>
      <p id="d1e1643">It should be noted here that the initial-stage data (i.e., March and April 2011) are excluded to obtain the decreasing rates to extract only the
resuspension period and to<?pagebreak page680?> exclude the influences of primary emissions. The
decrease rates of deposition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–4.69 years) were generally
slower than those of the concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.753</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2.07 years). It is
tricky to identify the reason for this phenomenon. A perfect simulation
could answer this question, but high uncertainties in atmospheric deposition
modeling and land surface modeling inhibit a perfect understanding of these
long-term circulations of radio-Cs in the environment. It is safe to presume
here that the decreasing tendencies in deposition and concentrations are
different because the contributions of major emission sources to deposition
and concentrations are different. If the dominant source of the
concentration is near (far from) the observation site and that for of
deposition is far from (near) the site, the faster decrease rate in
concentration is due to the faster (slower) reduction rate in the nearby
sources of emissions than in the distant sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e1676">There is also a distinct difference in the decreasing tendencies before and
after 2015. In addition to the effect of decontamination work, as previously
discussed in Sect. 3.1, the relative abundances of the dissolved and
particulate fractions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs could be a part of the reason. The
particulate fraction made up 72.6 % of the deposition in March 2011 (Fig. 3), which is presumed to have been largely influenced by primary emissions. Here,
it is interesting to note that most primary radio-Cs emissions are thought
to be composed of water-soluble submicron aerosol particles (e.g., Kaneyasu
et al., 2012, and almost all numerical simulations afterwards, such as Sato
et al., 2020), while water-insoluble Cs-bearing microparticles (CsMP; Adachi
et al., 2013; Igarashi et al., 2019b) may contribute somewhat to primary
emissions (Ikehara et al., 2020; Kajino et al., 2021). If the primary
radio-Cs species in aerosols were 100 % in water-soluble forms, the particulate
fraction should have made up 0 % of the precipitation in March 2011
(although some of the water-soluble Cs could have been converted to a
water-insoluble form through adsorption to soil particles accumulated on the
membrane filter during filtration). After April 2011, as the contributions
of resuspension were thought to be dominant, the dissolved fractions became
larger. The ratio varied, but the dissolved fractions were generally higher
before 2016, and the particulate fractions became dominant after 2016. There
seemed to be a regime change in the physicochemical properties of radio-Cs
circulating in the environment in the area around 2015, which could have
changed the decreasing tendencies of both the concentrations and deposition
before and after 2015. This result is consistent with the finding of Manaka
et al. (2019), who reported that the exchangeable proportions of radio-Cs
rapidly decreased in forest soils from 2 to 4 years after the accident
(i.e., from 2013 to 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e1688">The regression analysis is also applied over different time periods, and we
found a remarkable change in 2015. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before December 2013, 2014,
and 2015 is similar with values of 1.09, 1.30, and 1.56 years, respectively, but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after
January 2014, 2015, and 2016 is 3.98, 4.69, and 12.67 years, respectively. The
ratios of half-lives (after to before) of the three periods are 3.64, 3.61,
and 8.12, respectively, indicating that there could be a remarkable change
in the tendency between January 2015 and January 2016. Time series of
changes in the ratio before and after a particular date from 2014 to 2016
are illustrated in Fig. S1. Due to the lack of data, the half-lives
after 2015 varied substantially depending on the start month (exceeding
100 years in some cases). However, it is obvious that the ratio is stable
before January 2015 at a value of around 4.0, and it starts to increase from the spring to
summer of 2015. We may be able to<?pagebreak page681?> conclude that the regime change in the
physicochemical properties of radio-Cs occurred during the year 2015.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1716"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs activity deposition. The
red, blue, and lime lines indicate the regression lines of the whole period,
before 2015, and after 2015, respectively. The half-lives (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and decay
rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are also depicted. As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values after 2016 are
substantially different from those after 2015, the values are additionally
depicted in gray. <bold>(b)</bold> Time series of the particulate and dissolved forms of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs deposition on the left axis and the ratio of particulate to
dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs on the right axis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1802">The seasonal variations in particulate and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs were
slightly different from each other and different from those of the
concentration. The concentration peaked in March in almost all years, and
the total deposition peaked in January. The peaks of the total deposition in
January coincided with those of the dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs before 2016, but
the peaks of the dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs became unclear afterwards. The peaks
of particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs occurred in March before 2016, which coincided
with those of the concentrations. After 2016, there were no clear seasonal
variations in particulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs. There are clear and different seasonal
variations in the concentration and deposition. However, at the current
stage, we have no knowledge of or numerical tools to reveal the hidden
mechanisms underlying these variations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Size distributions</title>
      <p id="d1e1858">Figure 4 shows the time series of the seasonal mean concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs obtained from the cascade impactor measurements. The sampling
interval for the cascade impactor measurements was 3 weeks. The seasonal
means included a sampling period if any part of the sampling period was
included in the season; for example, the raw data from the sampling period
from February to March contributed to the averages of both DJF (December–January–February, i.e., winter) and MAM (March–April–May, i.e.,
spring). The seasonal mean total (all sizes) concentrations of cascade
impactor measurements during the sampling period agreed well with those of
the “all size” observations as presented in Fig. 2, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The same seasonal variation discussed for the all size observations (Sect. 3.1) was also observed; the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs concentration was
relatively high in DJF and MAM compared with that in JJA (June–July–August, i.e., summer) and SON (September–October–November, i.e.,
autumn).</p>
      <p id="d1e1894">The most dominant size range in activity was the backup filter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or rebounded particles such as soil dust and bioaerosols;
Kinase et al., 2018), and its seasonal variation agreed well with that of
the total particle concentration (high in DJF and MAM). On the other hand,
the second largest contribution was made by the size range of 4.2–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which showed the opposite seasonal variation and was relatively high in
JJA and SON. The seasonal variations in the largest particle fraction,
larger than 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are interesting: high in DJF and May (same as the
backup filter) but high in JJA in 2016 and 2017. The reason for the
variations and differences is not yet clear, but the current measurement
indicates that the dominant particles and their sizes may be distinct
depending on the season. The decrease rates of each size were different
before and after approximately 2015, as discussed in Sect. 3.1 and 3.2, but
the size distribution of the concentration did not change substantially
before and after approximately 2015.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1939"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of seasonal mean size-resolved airborne
surface concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <bold>(b)</bold> their relative fractions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1965"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of airborne surface concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.1–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) collected by the impactor–cyclone system and those of the backup
filter of the cascade impactor. <bold>(b)</bold> Correlation coefficients of
temporal variations among seasonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs concentrations of
different sizes measured by the impactor–cyclone system and the cascade impactor.
Correlation coefficients higher than approximately 0.4 and lower than
approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are colored blue and orange, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page682?><p id="d1e2056">Cascade impactor sampling is associated with the bouncing effect, whereas
filters for the impactor–cyclone system were immersed in silicone oil to
prevent the bouncing effect. Thus, the cascade impactor and the
impactor–cyclone measurement data are compared in Fig. 5. Figure 5a shows the data with the same measurement time intervals (3 weeks
for the cascade impactor data and 1 month for the impactor–cyclone data).
The concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the backup filters were well correlated
with those of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. No remarkable seasonality was observed in
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, but some enhancements were observed in JJA in 2015 and SON
in 2016.</p>
      <p id="d1e2086">Figure 5b shows the correlation coefficients among the
seasonal mean size-resolved data from the cascade impactor and
impactor–cyclone measurements. If we assume that the bouncing effect on the
impactor–cyclone measurements was negligible, the cascade impactor data and
the impactor–cyclone data were consistent. There was a positive correlation
between PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the backup filter data. There were also positive
correlations between PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the 1.3–2.1 and 4.2–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data. There was a negative correlation between PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which strongly indicates that fine-mode particles are the dominant carriers
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in winter and spring and that coarse-mode particles are the
dominant carriers of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in summer and autumn. However, there was
also a contradiction in the data. There were low or negative correlation
coefficients between the backup filter data and the cascade impactor data at
smaller size ranges, such as 0.39–0.69, 0.69–1.3, and 1.3–2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but
the backup filter data were positively correlated with the impactor data for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It appears that bouncing effect might have occurred:
particles larger than 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bounced in the latter stages and were
captured in the backup filter. However, as previously discussed, the
behavior of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particle data was not consistent
in time, i.e., they were generally high in DJF<?pagebreak page683?> and MAM and were high in JJA
in 2016 and 2017 (Fig. 4). Kinase et al. (2018) and Igarashi et al. (2019a)
considered that the dominant carriers of resuspended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs were
coarse-mode particles such as soil dust and bioaerosols. Ochiai et al. (2016) conducted two-stage impactor sampling and measured the airborne
surface concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs above and below 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2012 to 2014. They showed that the contributions of coarse-mode
particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were dominant, with maxima in summer.
The contributions of the fine-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
much smaller, and no significant seasonal variations were found. All of
their measurement sites were surrounded by contaminated forests in the
Abukuma Highlands (Tsushima and the nearby sites), so the sampling sites
were different from those in our study. Such larger particles may have
contributed to the backup filter data in the current measurements; however,
based on the fact that the backup filter data were positively correlated
with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and not with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, fine-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) should also play a key role in determining the concentrations in
Fukushima city.</p>
      <p id="d1e2332">On the other hand, if we assume that the bouncing effect is also significant
in the impactor–cyclone system due to the long sampling duration, as
suggested by Okuda et al. (2015), the positive correlation between the
backup filter particles and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was simply due to the bouncing effects
of the larger particles in both systems.</p>
      <p id="d1e2344">Even though the emission sources of the dominant particles collected by the
size-resolved measurements could not be identified in this study, the
possible aerosol sources that would explain the differences in size and
seasonality of the two locations are discussed later, in Sect. 4.1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Chemical characterizations of particles in the air, rainfall, and river
sediments</title>
      <p id="d1e2355">Figure 6 shows the relative abundance of the XRF-measured atomic number
concentrations of elements in the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> monthly sample from September 2014 to January 2018. Among the 15 detected species, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was mainly
composed of SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fractions of
SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> show clear seasonal variations and were higher around May. The
seasonal variations in Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the opposite of that
in SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. A positive temporal correlation was obtained between the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Negative correlations were
obtained for Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with correlation coefficients of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Note that these results do not prove that the
SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-bearing aerosols are the carriers of resuspended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs, but
we can safely conclude that the origins of SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs may be
close to each other (i.e., that both come from the same source or the same
area/direction).</p>
      <p id="d1e2583">Figure 7 shows comparisons of the relative abundance of the periodic mean
XRF-measured atomic number concentrations in different samples, fine
sediment particles, coarse sediment particles, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and particulate
fractions of precipitation. The PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and precipitation data over the
same period, from October 2014 and December 2012, were averaged. The
sediment samples were collected in 2010. The 10 species that were common to
all samples are shown in Fig. 7. The composition differences are not very
remarkable, and correlation coefficients for the compositions among samples are
above 0.9 s. The features of the PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> composition were distinct from the
others. PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> included SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (17.8 %) and Cl (2.65 %), whereas the
others did not.</p>
      <p id="d1e2631">Weathered biotite is abundant in the soil in Fukushima, and it absorbs radio-Cs
efficiently (Kogure et al., 2019). The compositional correlation
coefficients between the weathered biotite (Takase, 2020) and the four
samples were high: 0.73–0.87. However, when the two major components
SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were excluded, the compositional correlation
coefficients changed significantly. The eight (the common 10 species shown
in Fig. 7 minus SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) compositional correlation
coefficients between the fine and coarse sediment particles were 0.98, but
those between the sediments and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were 0.01 and 0.19 for the fine and
coarse sediment particles, respectively. The eight compositional correlation
coefficients for the particulate fractions of precipitation were moderate:
0.36, 0.44, and 0.45 for fine sediment particles, coarse sediment
particles, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The eight compositional correlation
coefficients for weathered biotite were 0.76, 0.71, 0.50, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for fine
sediment particles, coarse sediment particles, particulate fractions of
precipitation, and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2729">Temporal variations in the chemical composition of
PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as measured by XRF.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2749">Periodic mean chemical compositions of fine particles and
coarse particles in sediments, PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the precipitation filter (the
particulate fraction of precipitation) measured by XRF.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2767">The findings from the current section are summarized as follows. The mean
compositions of both fine and coarse sediment particles are similar to those
of biotite, which absorbs radio-Cs efficiently. A similar composition
feature was observed for the particulate fractions of precipitation. The
composition of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was slightly different from those of the other
samples, but the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs concentrations in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> became larger when
the relative fractions of SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the major component of biotite,
increased. Thus, biotite may have played a key role in the environmental
behavior of radio-Cs in Fukushima city since September 2014. However, the
major carriers of radio-Cs before September 2014 and those in the dissolved
fractions in precipitation are still unknown.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Comparison with the simulation results and climatological deposition
velocity analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2815">In Fig. 8, the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in 2013 simulated by Kajino et
al. (2016) are compared with the time-resolved observation data (Fig. 2).
Kajino et al. (2016) included <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs resuspended from bare soil,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs resuspended from forest ecosystems, and additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs
emissions from the FDNPP. The additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs emissions were
negligibly small in East Japan, with concentrations that were 2–3 orders of magnitude smaller than those from the two abovementioned sources;
therefore, the additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs emissions are not depicted in the figure. The simulation was
successful in<?pagebreak page684?> explaining the magnitude and seasonal variations in
concentrations at Tsushima and Tsukuba, but the simulation in Fukushima city
disagreed with the observations. The simulation showed an enhancement of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs from forests in the summer, but this was not detected in the
observations. The observed magnitude and seasonal trends are rather similar
to those simulated for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs from soil dust.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2893">Time series of (black) measured airborne surface
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and those simulated (by Kajino et al., 2016;
K16) considering different emission sources, mineral dust from bare
soil (red)  and aerosols emitted from forest ecosystems (lime).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2911">Kajino et al. (2016) used only the observed concentrations to estimate the
regional budget of resuspended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the air, but we used the
observed deposition to evaluate the model, as shown in Fig. 9. Suppose there
is a simple nonlinear relationship between the deposition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and airborne
surface concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M239" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents a removal rate, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents nonlinearity, such as
spatial and temporal variabilities. If one can take a long-term average of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eq. (1) may hold. Equation (1) is reformulated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M244" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The log–log scatterplot between the monthly mean concentrations and monthly
cumulative deposition of observed (purple) and simulated (orange) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs
is depicted in Fig. 9a. The coefficient of determination
of the observation was 0.68, with a risk factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. Equation (1)
holds for the monthly mean resuspended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs at Fukushima University.
As seen in Eq. (2), the intercept of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis indicates the removal rate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. log(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is dimensionless, but if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is close to 1, the unit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be meters per second (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). From Fig. 9, the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for observation is close to 1.
Therefore, the ratios of the monthly deposition amounts to the monthly mean
concentrations are referred to as the climatological deposition velocity (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Time series of the climatological deposition velocity are
presented in Fig. 9b. Note that the concept of
climatological deposition velocity differs from that of dry deposition
velocity. The dry deposition velocity is defined as the ratio of the mass
flux divided by the concentrations, but this climatological deposition
velocity is only the ratio of total (dry plus wet) deposition amounts
divided by concentrations without the concept of mass flux. To account for
the wet deposition flux, both in-cloud and below-cloud concentrations<?pagebreak page685?> are
needed, but such vertical measurement data are not available.</p>
      <p id="d1e3124">Figure 9a clearly shows that the removal rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) used in
Kajino et al. (2016) can be underestimated by 1–2 orders of
magnitude. The deposition velocities used in Kajino et al. (2016) were
estimated from the observation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in March 2011, which was
supposed to be mainly composed of submicron water-soluble particles.
However, the current study and the series of previous studies regarding
resuspended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs indicated that the host particles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs could
be substantially larger (e.g., soil and bioaerosols). This may be the reason
for the overestimation of the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs concentration from forests
during summer in Fukushima city. If the deposition velocities of the model
increased by 1–2 orders of magnitude, the transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs
from the contaminated forest to Fukushima city in summer may decrease such
that the simulated concentration in Fukushima city agrees with the
observation. Certainly, their simulated regional budget needs to be
reassessed using the realistic deposition velocities indicated in the
current study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3182"><bold>(a)</bold> Scatterplot of (purple circles) observed
airborne surface concentrations and deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs as well as those
simulated (by Kajino et al., 2016; K16) considering different emission
sources, mineral dust from bare soil (orange open squares) and aerosols emitted from forest ecosystems (orange solid
squares). The purple and orange
lines indicate the regression lines of the observed data and the simulated
(both dust and forest) data, respectively. <bold>(b)</bold> Time series of (blue) climatological
deposition velocity on the left axis and (gray) precipitation amounts on the
right axis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3205">The observed climatological deposition velocity varied by more than 1 order of magnitude over time. There are two main deposition mechanisms: dry
deposition and wet deposition. Wet deposition is associated with
precipitation. The variations in the climatological deposition rate seem to
agree with the observed precipitation, but almost no correlation was
observed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The mean climatological deposition
velocity was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the peak values
occurred in January. The maximum value was 4.9 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in January 2013,
when the monthly precipitation was not very high (81.2 mm). Possible reasons
for these peaks in January are discussed later, in Sect. 4.3. The typical
order of the dry deposition velocity of supermicron (1–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
diameter) particles is approximately 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g.,
Petroff and Zhang, 2010), which is substantially lower than the values in
our climatological deposition velocity analysis. As mentioned above, the
magnitudes of the instant deposition velocity and our climatological
deposition velocity are not directly comparable, but it demonstrates the
efficacy of wet deposition as compared with dry deposition. Wet deposition
plays an important role in the removal of resuspended <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs-bearing
particles from the air.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3320"><bold>(a)</bold> Scatterplot of the observed surface
deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs at Fukushima University and the MRI from March 2011
to March 2019, with a regression line. <bold>(b)</bold> Time series of the ratio of
deposition at Fukushima University to deposition at the MRI, with a
regression line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/675/2022/acp-22-675-2022-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Comparison of deposition amounts at Fukushima University and the MRI</title>
      <p id="d1e3351">Figure 10 compares the deposition amounts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs at Fukushima
University (60 km northwest of the FDNPP) and the MRI (170 km southwest of
the FDNPP) from March 2011 to March 2019. The deposition data at the MRI are
available from Environmental Radioactivity and Radiation in Japan
(<uri>https://www.kankyo-hoshano.go.jp/data/database/</uri>, last access: 14 June 2021). There was a significant positive correlation between the deposition
amounts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs at the two sites, but the ratios varied substantially
over time. Figure 10b indicates that the deposition ratios
at the two sites were approximately 10, which is almost the same level as
the initial amounts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">202</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at Fukushima University and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the MRI), with a variation of more than 1 order of magnitude and peaks in winter (especially January) that decreased
slightly over time. Figure 9b shows that the January peak is
typical in Fukushima city and was not observed at the MRI. The possible
reasons for the January peak in Fukushima city are discussed later, in Sect. 4.3. The slight decreasing tendency was probably due to decontamination,
which was ongoing in Fukushima during the period until 2018, as shown later
in Table 1. Certainly, natural variations could also have contributed to the
decreasing tendency.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3439">Even 8 years after the FDNPP accident, the airborne surface
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs has not fallen to the level prior to the
accident, which was at an order of magnitude of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
“difficult-to-return” zones, the concentrations sometimes still exceed
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Bq m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on long-term measurements, this study tries to
understand the characteristics of radio-Cs in the air and its deposition and
to reveal its origins in order to identify effective ways to reduce
radioactivity in contaminated terrestrial ecosystems.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Seasonal variation and possible sources</title>
      <p id="d1e3506">The current study clearly shows that the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs are
high from winter to spring, with peaks in March, and low from summer to
autumn in the urban/rural area of Fukushima city (60 km northwest of the
FDNPP). It also shows that the deposition amounts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs are high in
the winter, especially in January, and low from summer to autumn. This
seasonal trend is the opposite of that observed in a forested area in the
Abukuma Highlands (Tsushima, 30 km northwest of the FDNPP), which was high
in the summer (Ochiai et al., 2016; Kinase et al., 2018). From winter to
spring, northwesterly winds prevail over the region associated with
migrating disturbances, while southeasterly winds prevail over the region
associated with the Pacific high pressure system. The three simulated
monthly mean surface wind fields for January to March and June to August are
shown in Kajino et al. (2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e3527">In summer, Fukushima city is downwind of Tsushima. The concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs at Tsushima are approximately 10 times greater than those in
Fukushima city, but there is no enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in summer. The
traveling distances of carrier aerosols depend on their aerodynamic
diameters. The distance between the two sites is approximately 30 km. The
traveling distances of aerosols below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not very
different and are larger than 100 km because their gravitational deposition
velocities are negligibly small. On the other hand, the traveling distances
rapidly decrease proportionally to a square of the diameter above 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the<?pagebreak page686?> traveling distance of an aerosol with a diameter of several tens of micrometers is on the order of 10 km (Kajino et al., 2021). Igarashi et al. (2019a)
reported that the major proportions of bioaerosols in forests in summer are
smaller than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in diameter and can travel a fairly long distance.
Pollen is much larger than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but pollen emission is limited in
summer (Igarashi et al., 2019a). Consequently, there was a significant
enhancement in concentrations in the forests in summer but no enhancement in
the downwind urban/rural areas, probably because the carrier aerosols were
efficiently deposited onto the ground surface by wet deposition in addition
to dry deposition before significant amounts of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs
reached the downwind areas. Consistent with our findings presented in Fig. 5, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was more abundant than that in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
backup filter particles in summer. To obtain a quantitative understanding of
the regional cycle of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the northern part of
Fukushima Prefecture, accurate simulations are required in the future.</p>
      <p id="d1e3645">In winter and spring, the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs are probably enhanced
due to local emissions from nearby sources because the location of
the sampling site is upwind of the Abukuma Highlands and the ground surface
in areas upwind of the sampling site in the season (northwest
directions) is less contaminated than the site. In winter and spring,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the backup filter particles and PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is pronounced in
Fukushima city. These characteristics are somewhat different from those
reported in previous studies. Miyamoto et al. (2014) measured the size
distributions of radio-Cs with a cascade impactor for two periods, from
17 March to 1 April and from 9 to 13 May 2011, at a site 120 km southwest of the
FDNPP. They showed that the peak size ranges were 1.2–2.1 and
0.65–1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the former and latter periods, respectively. Doi et
al. (2013) reported that the peak diameters of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs concentration
from 4 to 11 April were 1.0 and 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Tsukuba, 170 km
southwest of the FDNPP. Kaneyasu et al. (2017) measured the size
distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and other chemical components six times at
Tsukuba from April to September 2011. The peak diameter ranges were 0.49–0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the earlier stages (before  9 June), but the contributions of
coarse-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) increased after  9 June, and
the second modes appeared in the ranges of 3.5–5.2 and 7.8–11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in July and September, respectively.<?pagebreak page687?> Judging from their measured
mass size distributions of Ca, which is assumed to originate from mineral
soil, Kaneyasu et al. (2017) concluded that soil particles could be the
major carrier of resuspended radio-Cs in Tsukuba. Our XRF analysis indicated
that radio-Cs is carried mainly by soil particles in Fukushima city, but the
size distributions are greater in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in
the backup filter particles. If radio-Cs is carried by soil particles, it is
natural to presume that the fractions of radio-Cs in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> would be large
(e.g., Fig. 3 of Kaneyasu et al., 2012, or Fig. 4 of Kaneyasu et al., 2017).
One could argue that the bounced coarse-mode soil particles are observed in
the backup filters, but, in fact, the seasonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs concentrations
in the backup filter are positively correlated with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and negatively
correlated with PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5). One could further argue that bounced
large particles are also collected in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> despite the special
procedures employed to prevent rebound in the impactor–cyclone system.</p>
      <p id="d1e3830">There are four possible explanations for these results:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3835">If the bouncing
effect did not occur in either system, the major sources of radio-Cs in
Fukushima city are probably related to combustion (a mass peak below 0.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> means that the number peak is approximately 100 nm).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3849">If the
bouncing effect occurred only in the cascade impactor, the size
distributions of soil particles in Fukushima city are smaller, or radio-Cs
in the soil exists more within finer particles.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3853">If the
bouncing effect occurred only in the cascade impactor, the coarse-mode
fraction deposits to the ground surface faster than the fine-mode fraction,
such that the proportion of radio-Cs in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger in Fukushima city.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3866">The bouncing effect occurs in both systems, and the origin of radio-Cs is
coarse-mode soil particles.</p></list-item></list>
Point 1 is less likely because there is little
chance of the artificial combustion of contaminated biomass. In fact, there
were no temporal correlations between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and levoglucosan (a
biomass burning marker) concentrations at Tsushima during the forest fire
event in the Abukuma Highlands that occurred in March 2013 (Kinase et al.,
2018). Point 3 is also less likely because long-range transport (at least 100 km) is required for the major proportions of coarse-mode particles to
deposit to the ground surface, whereas Fukushima city is characterized as
the emission source region in that season. In terms of point 2, the latter
sentence, “radio-Cs in the soil exists more with finer particles”,
contradicts Kaneyasu et al. (2017), suggesting that radio-Cs is
uniformly distributed on the surface of soil particles. Point 4 is possible,
as Okuda et al. (2015) showed that a long-duration impactor–cyclone
measurement could be associated with the bouncing effect despite the use of
silicone oil. Further experiments are required to determine whether point 2 or
point 4 is more likely and whether some sources are missing. As Kaneyasu et al. (2012) and (2017) reported, comparing the size distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs
with those of other chemical components in Fukushima city would be an
effective way to investigate the origin of resuspended radio-Cs from winter
to spring. Alternatively, a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cyclone or virtual impactor could be
used to separate the fine-mode and coarse-mode particles and
completely exclude the bouncing effect.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Differences in trends before and after approximately 2015 (natural
variation and decontamination)</title>
      <p id="d1e3905">As described in Sect. 3.1 and 3.2, distinct decrease rates were observed
before and after approximately 2015 in both the concentrations and the
deposition. There may be two main reasons for this: natural variation and
decontamination. Natural variation (the dissolved fractions of
precipitation or the exchangeable proportions of forest soils discharging
faster than other forms from the local ecosystems; Manaka et al., 2019) has been
previously described, and the effect of decontamination is presented in some
detail here.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3911">Decontamination achievement ratios in Fukushima city and
the surrounding municipalities (Nihonmatsu city, Kawamata town<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Date
city, and Koori town).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">March 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">March 2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">March 2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">March 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">March 2018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6">Fukushima city </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Residential area (number of houses)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Public facility (number of facilities)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">89.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">92.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">97.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Road (km)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">39.6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Agricultural field (ha)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">94.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">94.4 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">95.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">96.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Forest<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (ha)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">80.8 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col6">The surrounding municipalities </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Residential area (number of houses)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">87.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">97.4 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">99.6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Public facility (number of facilities)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">94.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Road (km)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48.7 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56.8 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">67.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">82.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Agricultural field (ha)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">99.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">99.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">99.6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Forest<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (ha)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23.9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">36.7 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64.1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">88.6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3923"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Only the western part of Kawamata town. The decontamination of areas
with an annual cumulative dose exceeding 20 mSv was assigned to the central
government, and the decontamination in areas with a dose below 20 mSv was assigned to
municipal governments. The decontamination of the eastern part of Kawamata
town was conducted by the central government.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Removal of the litter layer in forests within 20 m of the forest
edge.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4241">Table 1 summarizes the achievement ratios of the scheduled decontamination
of different land use types in Fukushima city and the surrounding
municipalities (available at
<uri>https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/site/portal/progress.html</uri>, last access:
14 June 2021). The municipalities are in the northern part of Fukushima
Prefecture, which comprises 55 % forest area, 15 % farmland area, 6 % residential area, and 23 % other areas
(<uri>https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/uploaded/attachment/42042.pdf</uri>, last
access: 14 June 2021). More than 94 % decontamination was achieved for
the farmland area by March 2014. For the residential and public facility
areas, some parts were decontaminated by March 2014, but others were
not fully decontaminated until March 2018. For the road and forest areas,
decontamination was not completed in most areas by March 2014, but extensive
decontamination was conducted from 2014 to 2018. Note that only a part of
the forest (20 m from the forest edges) was decontaminated, which accounts
for approximately 1 % of the whole forest area of the northern part of
Fukushima Prefecture. Additionally, only the litter layer of the forest was
removed, and the soil layer remained.</p>
      <p id="d1e4251">If one assumed that contamination occurred independently of the land use type,
approximately 30 % (farmland and half of the residential and other land types) of
northern Fukushima was decontaminated by 2014, and an additional 15 %
(half of the residential and other land types) was continuously decontaminated by 2018. The
difference between the decrease rate from May 2011 to December 2014 (93.1 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and that afterwards (30.7 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was higher than the
decontamination rate (30 %–45 % every 3–7 years). If the
concentration at Fukushima University was affected mainly by the emissions
from nearby sources (i.e., within the northern part of Fukushima
Prefecture), decontamination would not be the sole reason for the change in
the decrease<?pagebreak page688?> rates before approximately 2015 and after this period. Natural variation
(i.e., regime changes in the chemical forms of radio-Cs) would likely have occurred
during that period. As previously discussed, biotite may have played a key
role in the environmental behaviors of radio-Cs in Fukushima city after
approximately 2015, but the current study could not identify the key aerosol
particles that carried dissolved (or exchangeable) radio-Cs and were
abundant in Fukushima city before approximately 2015.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Substantial deposition amounts in January in Fukushima city</title>
      <p id="d1e4286">The climatological deposition velocities (or the ratios of the deposition
rate to the mean airborne surface concentration) in Fukushima city were
remarkably high in January 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2017 (Fig. 9). They were
approximately 1 order of magnitude larger than those in the other months.
The ratio of the deposition in Fukushima to that at the MRI was
approximately 10 on average, but the ratios in January of those years exceeded
100 (Fig. 10). On the other hand, no peaks were observed in January of 2012,
2016, or 2018.</p>
      <p id="d1e4289">There are two possible explanations for these results: vertical distribution
and the existence of superlarge particles. In terms of the former, the
substantial proportions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in the upper air may have caused lower
concentrations but higher deposition due to the wet removal of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs
aloft. However, due to the northwesterly winter monsoon, the upper air over
Fukushima city is also upwind of the Abukuma Highlands; thus, this
possibility is less likely. In terms of the latter, superlarge particles
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or larger in diameter) have settling
velocities that are too high (as high as those of drizzle droplets) to enter
the high-volume air sampler but that allow them to settle efficiently in a
deposition sampler. Unfortunately, however, analyses of the surface
meteorological observational data for Fukushima city from the JMA, such as
temperature, precipitation, snow cover, and wind speed data, did not reveal
the differentiating features between the years with (2013, 2014, 2015, and
2017) and without (2012, 2016, and 2018) high deposition peaks.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4340">Eight years of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs measurements conducted
at Fukushima University from March 2011 to March 2019 are summarized in this
study. A high-volume sampler, a cascade impactor, and an impactor–cyclone
system were used to collect aerosol samples, and the airborne surface
concentrations of radio-Cs were detected by high-purity germanium detectors.
A precipitation sampler was used to collect deposition samples, and the
dissolved and particulate fractions of radio-Cs in the samples were
measured. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was carried out to measure the
elemental contents of the aerosol and precipitation samples. The
concentration and deposition data measured at Fukushima University were
compared with numerical simulation results.</p>
      <p id="d1e4361">The major findings are itemized as follows:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4366">The observed radio-Cs concentrations and deposition at Fukushima University (an
urban/rural area of Fukushima city, 60 km northwest of the FDNPP) were high
in winter and low in summer; these seasonal trends are the same as those
observed in the city area (Kitayama et al., 2016) and the opposite of<?pagebreak page689?> those
observed in a contaminated forest area (30 km northwest of the FDNPP, in the Abukuma Highlands) (Ochiai et al., 2016; Kinase et al.,
2018). Resuspension
due to bioaerosol emissions (Kinase et al., 2018; Igarashi et al., 2019a)
may be substantial in forests but may not be in urban/rural areas. The
half-life (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and decrease rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the 8 years were 1.24 years and 55.9 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the concentrations and 2.49 years and 27.8 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the deposition, respectively.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4416">The bioavailability of different chemical forms of radio-Cs in soils may
be an important factor determining the tendencies of concentrations and
deposition at Fukushima University. The decreasing tendencies changed around
2015 and were associated with changes in the dissolved/particulate fractions
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in precipitation. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for concentrations
before 2015 were 0.754 years and 92.0 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, whereas they were 2.07 years
and 33.5 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after 2015, respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for deposition
before 2015 were 1.30 years and 53.4 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, whereas they were 4.69 years
and 14.8 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after 2015, respectively, and 12.7 years and 5.5 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after
2016, respectively. The dissolved fractions were higher before 2015, whereas the
particulate fractions were higher after 2016. This may have been because the
dissolved proportion of radio-Cs discharged faster than its particulate
forms from the local terrestrial ecosystems. Decontamination likely also
contributed to the difference because the decontamination of some land use
types, such as agricultural fields, was completed before 2014, and 100 %
of the planned decontamination was completed by March 2018. The contribution
of decontamination was estimated to be 30 %–45 % for the
3–7 years in this study, which is significantly smaller than the differences in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the concentrations (92.0 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> before 2015 and 33.5
(5.5) % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after 2015 (2016)). Therefore, decontamination may play
a partial role in explaining the differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before and
after 2015, but changes in the chemical forms of radio-Cs likely play a
major role.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4592">The size-resolved measurements revealed that seasonal variations in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs of different sizes are different from each other. Due to the
possible bouncing effect of the cascade impactor and long-duration
measurement of the impactor–cyclone system, it is hard to quantify the
values, but the current measurement indicates that the dominant particles and
their sizes may be distinct depending on the season. The XRF analysis showed
that biotite may have played a key role in the environmental circulation of
particulate forms of resuspended radio-Cs in Fukushima city after September 2014.</p></list-item></list>
Certain issues remained unresolved, and topics for future study are
summarized as follows:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4607">The height of our measurement (building roof) is higher than the other
measurements referenced in this study (near the ground). When the
observation site is characterized as an emission source, there should be a
clear vertical difference in concentration; thus, the concentration
measured at Fukushima University is not equivalently comparable with the
other location data. It may be comparable when the site is characterized as
a downwind region, as turbulent mixing during transport may reduce the
vertical difference. In the future, parallel sampling near the ground and
rooftop will need to be installed to characterize the sampling locations and
to quantify the vertical differences at the Fukushima University site.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4611">The rebound issue of the impactor and the cyclone/impactor instruments
have not yet been resolved. Parallel sampling is also required for the
size-resolved measurements using normal filters and filters with adhesive
materials such as vacuum grease. The additional microscopy of the filters is
even more useful.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4615">The Abukuma Highlands are upwind of Fukushima city in summer. The
enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer is consistent with the fact
that most bioaerosols exist in the coarse mode. However, if radiocesium is
carried mainly by biotite (i.e., soil particles) in winter, there should be
an enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> because major proportions of soil
particles exist in the coarse mode (e.g., Kaneyasu et al., 2017). On the other
hand, sources of Cs-bearing fine-mode particles such as combustion emissions
may be less likely. Thus, the main carrier of radio-Cs may be biotite in
winter, but this is still not fully confirmed. XRF measurements were
conducted for PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from September 2014 to January 2018, when the
particulate proportions were dominant in the precipitation. Thus, the
carrier aerosols of dissolved radio-Cs in Fukushima city are still unknown.
As Kaneyasu et al. (2012) and (2017) reported, comparisons of the size
distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs with those of other chemical components in
Fukushima city would be an effective way to investigate the origin of
resuspended radio-Cs from winter to spring. Alternatively, a PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
cyclone or virtual impactor could be applied to separate the fine-mode and
coarse-mode particles, which can completely exclude the bouncing effect.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4683">The simulation used in this study was made to be consistent with the
concentrations in a contaminated forest (Tsushima) and those in a downwind
area (the MRI, 170 km southwest of the FDNPP). However, the current study
found that the simulated seasonal variation in Fukushima city was the total
opposite of that for the observations. The current study indicated that the
deposition velocities applied in the simulation were significantly
underestimated. Numerical simulation is a<?pagebreak page690?> powerful tool for quantitative
assessment, but the current simulation requires further improvement. The
reasons for the seasonal variations in concentrations and deposition in the
different locations need to be investigated with an improved model.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4687">The deposition amounts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs in January at Fukushima University
were remarkably high compared to the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs and the
deposition amounts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs at the MRI. The reason needs to be
investigated in the future.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4721">The observation data used in the study are provided as a Microsoft Excel
file in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4724">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-675-2022-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-675-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4733">AW, KN, and AS conducted the long-term measurements. YN
performed the XRF analysis, and MK performed the numerical simulation. AW,
MK, and KN designed the structure of the paper and completed the draft with input from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4739">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4745">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4751">The authors thank Teruyuki Nakajima (National Institute for Environmental Studies) and Haruo Tsuruta (Remote Sensing Technology Center) for proving and installing a high-volume sampler and Naohiro Yoshida (Tokyo Institute of Technology) for the installation of an impactor observation system. The authors are grateful to Shogo Togo (Isotope Research Center of the University of Tokyo) for the radioactivity measurements of the initial samples and to Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Zijian Zhang, Makoto Inagaki, Shunsuke Kakitani, Kazuya Fujihara, and Nobufumi Fujita (Osaka University) for their support with the radioactivity measurements of the air samples. The authors also thank Kakeru Konnai (University of Tsukuba) for data visualization, Akane Saya (MRI) for a useful discussion on aerosol deposition processes, and Tomoaki Okuda (Keio University) for a useful discussion on the possible artifacts in the impactor measurements.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4756">This research has been supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) (grant nos. JP16H01777 and JP24110009); the Sumitomo Foundation's environmental studies grant; and the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan via the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (grant no. JPMEERF20215003).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4762">This paper was edited by Stefano Galmarini and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Kajino, M., Zaizen, Y., and Igarashi, Y.: Emission of spherical
cesium-bearing particles from an early stage of the Fukushima nuclear
accident, Sci. Rep.-UK, 3, 12–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02554" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep02554</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ager, A. A., Lasko, R., Myroniuk, V., Zibtsev, S., Day, M. A., Usenia, U.,
Bogomolov, V., Kovalets, I., and Evers, C. R.: The wildfire problem in areas
contaminated by the Chernobyl disaster, Sci. Total Environ., 696,
133954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133954" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133954</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Doi, T., Masumoto, K., Toyoda, A., Tanaka, A., Shibata, Y., and Hirose, K.: Anthropogenic radionuclides in the atmosphere observed at Tsukuba: characteristics of the radionuclides derived from Fukushima, J. Environ. Radioact., 122, 55–62, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.02.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.02.001</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Igarashi, Y., Kita, K., Maki, T., Kinase, T., Hayashi, N., Hosaka, K.,
Adachi, K., Kajino, M., Ishizuka, M., Sekiyama, T. T., Zaizen, Y., Takenaka,
C., Ninomiya, K., Okochi, H., and Sorimachi, A.: Fungal spore involvement in
the resuspension of radiocaesium in summer, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 1954,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37698-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-37698-x</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Igarashi, Y., Kogure, T., Kurihara, Y., Miura, H., Okumura, T., Satou, Y.,
Takahashi, Y. and Yamaguchi, N.: A review of Cs-bearing microparticles in
the environment emitted by the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant
accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 205–206, 101–118,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.04.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.04.011</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Igarashi, Y., Onda, Y., Wakiyama, Y., Konoplev, A., Zheleznyak, M., Lisovyi,
H., Laptev, G., Damiyanovich, V., Samoilov, D., Nanba, K., and Kirieiev, S.:
Impact of wildfire on 137Cs and 90Sr wash-off in heavily contaminated
forests in the Chernobyl exclusion zone, Environ. Pollut., 259, 113764,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113764" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113764</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ikehara, R., Morooka, K., Suetake, M., Komiya, T., Kurihara, E., Takehara,
M., Takami, R., Kino, C., Horie, K., Takehara, M., Yamasaki, S., Ohnuki, T.,
Law, G. T. W., Bower, W., Grambow, B., Ewing, R. C., and Utsunomiya, S.:
Abundance and distribution of radioactive cesium-rich microparticles
released from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the
environment, Chemosphere, 241, 125019,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125019</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Iwagami, S., Onda, Y., Tsujimura, M., and Abe, Y.: Contribution of
radioactive 137Cs discharge by suspended sediment, coarse organic matter,
and dissolved fraction from a headwater catchment in Fukushima after the
Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 166,
466–474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.025</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page691?><ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kajino, M., Ishizuka, M., Igarashi, Y., Kita, K., Yoshikawa, C., and Inatsu, M.: Long-term assessment of airborne radiocesium after the Fukushima nuclear accident: re-suspension from bare soil and forest ecosystems, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13149–13172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13149-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13149-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kajino, M., Adachi, K., Igarashi, Y., Satou, Y., Sawada, M., Thomas
Sekiyama, T., Zaizen, Y., Saya, A., Tsuruta, H. and Moriguchi, Y.:
Deposition and Dispersion of Radio-Cesium Released due to the Fukushima
Nuclear Accident: 2. Sensitivity to Aerosol Microphysical Properties of
Cs-Bearing Microparticles (CsMPs), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033460,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033460" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033460</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaneyasu, N., Ohashi, H., Suzuki, F., Okuda, T., and Ikemori, F.: Sulfate
aerosol as a potential transport medium of radiocesium from the fukushima
nuclear accident, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 5720–5726,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es204667h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es204667h</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaneyasu, N., Ohashi, H., Suzuki, F., Okuda, T., Ikemori, F., Akata, N., and Kogure, T.: Weak size dependence of resuspended radiocesium adsorbed on soil particles collected after the Fukushima nuclear accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 172, 122–129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.03.001</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kinase, T., Kita, K., Igarashi, Y., Adachi, K., Ninomiya, K., Shinohara, A.,
Okochi, H., Ogata, H., Ishizuka, M., Toyoda, S., Yamada, K., Yoshida, N.,
Zaizen, Y., Mikami, M., Demizu, H., and Onda, Y.: The seasonal variations of
atmospheric 134,137Cs activity and possible host particles for their
resuspension in the contaminated areas of Tsushima and Yamakiya, Fukushima,
Japan, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 5, 12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0171-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40645-018-0171-z</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kita, K., Igarashi, Y., Kinase, T., Hayashi, N., Ishizuka, M., Adachi, K.,
Koitabashi, M., Sekiyama, T. T., and Onda, Y.: Rain-induced bioecological
resuspension of radiocaesium in a polluted forest in Japan, Sci. Rep.-UK,
10, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72029-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-72029-z</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kitayama, K., Ohse, K., Shima, N., Kawatsu, K., and Tsukada H.: Regression
model analysis of the decreasing trend of cesium-137 concentration in the
atmosphere since the Fukushima accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 164,
151–157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.015</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kogure, T., Mukai, H., and Kikuchi, R.: Weathered biotite: A key material of
radioactive contamination in Fukushima, in: Agricultural Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident (III): After 7 years, edited by: Nakanishi, T. M., O'Brien,
M., and Tanoi, K., Springer Open, Singapore,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3218-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-981-13-3218-0</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Manaka, T., Imamura, N., Kaneko, S., Miura, S., Furusawa, H., and Kanasashi,
T.: Six-year trends in exchangeable radiocesium in Fukushima forest soils,
J. Environ. Radioact., 203, 84–92,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.02.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.02.014</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology): The
manual for analysis of radiocesium, Issue No. 3 of a Series of Manuals for
Measurement of Radioactivity, Japan Chemical Analysis Center, Chiba, Japan, available at
<uri>https://www.kankyo-hoshano.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/No3.pdf</uri> (last
access: 8 December 2021),
1976 (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Minami, K., Katata, G., Kita, K., Sorimachi, A., Hosaka, K., and Igarashi, Y.: Numerical analyses of transport processes of bioaerosol released from a temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest, Earozoru Kenkyu, 35, 208–218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11203/jar.35.208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.11203/jar.35.208</ext-link>, 2020 (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miyamoto, Y., Yasuda, K., and Magara, M.: Size distribution of radioactive particles collected at Tokai, Japan 6 days after the nuclear accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 123, 1–7, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.01.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.01.010</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nakajima, T., Misawa, S., Morino, Y., Tsuruta, H., Goto, D., Uchida, J.,
Takemura, T., Ohara, T., Oura, Y., Ebihara, M., and Satoh, M.: Model
depiction of the atmospheric flows of radioactive cesium emitted from the
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci.,
4, 2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-017-0117-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40645-017-0117-x</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>NRA (Nuclear Regulation Authority): Airborne Monitoring Results
in each prefecture, available at: <uri>http://radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/en/list/203/list-1.html</uri> (last access: 13 January 2022), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ochiai, S., Hasegawa, H., Kakiuchi, H., Akata, N., Ueda, S., Tokonami, S.,
and Hisamatsu, S.: Temporal variation of post-accident atmospheric 137Cs in
an evacuated area of Fukushima Prefecture: Size-dependent behaviors of
137Cs-bearing particles, J. Environ. Radioact., 165, 131–139,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.09.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.09.014</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Okuda, T., Isobe, R., Nagai, Y., Okahisa, S., Funato, K., and Inoue, K.:
Development of a high-volume PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> particle sample using impactor and
cyclone techniques, Aerosol Air Qaul. Res., 15, 759–767,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.09.0194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2014.09.0194</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Onda, Y., Taniguchi, K., Yoshimura, K., Kato, H., Takahashi, J., Wakiyama,
Y., Coppin, F., and Smith, H.: Radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi
Nuclear Power Plant in terrestrial systems, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1,
644–660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0099-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-020-0099-x</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Petroff, A. and Zhang, L.: Development and validation of a size-resolved particle dry deposition scheme for application in aerosol transport models, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 753–769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-753-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-753-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sato, Y., Sekiyama, T. T., Fang, S., Kajino, M., Quérel, A., Quélo,
D., Kondo, H., Terada, H., Kadowaki, M., Takigawa, M., Morino, Y., Uchida,
J., Goto, D., and Yamazawa, H.: A model intercomparison of atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs concentrations from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
accident, phase III: Simulation with an identical source term and
meteorological field at 1-km resolution, Atmos. Environ.-X, 7, 100086,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100086" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100086</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Steinhauser, G., Niisoe, T., Harada, K. H., Shozugawa, K., Schneider, S.,
Synal, H. A., Walther, C., Christl, M., Nanba, K., Ishikawa, H., and Koizumi,
A.: Post-Accident Sporadic Releases of Airborne Radionuclides from the
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
14028–14035, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b03155</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Takase, T.: Study of the existence form of radioactive cesium – In the case
of fine particles collected from the suburbs of FDNPP, Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research Result Reports (grant number 17K00545), 9 pp.,
available at:
<uri>https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/file/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17K00545/17K00545seika.pdf</uri>
(last access: 23 June 2021), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Takase, T. and Nagahashi, Y.: Determination of major and trace elements in
rock samples by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry -Comparison with a glass
bands and a powder pellets method-, Journal of the Center for Regional
Affairs Fukushima University, 19, 32–47, 2007 (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page692?><ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Terada, H., Nagai, H., Tsuduki, K., Furuno, A., Kadowaki, M., and Kakefuda,
T.: Refinement of source term and atmospheric dispersion simulations of
radionuclides during the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident,
J. Environ. Radioact., 213, 106104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106104</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>WHO (World Health Organization): IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Some Internally Deposited Radionuclides, IARC Press, 78, 617 pp., 2001.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yoshimura, K., Saegusa, J., and Sanada, Y.: Initial decrease in the ambient
dose equivalent rate after the Fukushima accident and its difference from
Chernobyl, Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60847-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-60847-0</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Eight-year variations in atmospheric radiocesium in Fukushima city</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adachi, K., Kajino, M., Zaizen, Y., and Igarashi, Y.: Emission of spherical
cesium-bearing particles from an early stage of the Fukushima nuclear
accident, Sci. Rep.-UK, 3, 12–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02554" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02554</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ager, A. A., Lasko, R., Myroniuk, V., Zibtsev, S., Day, M. A., Usenia, U.,
Bogomolov, V., Kovalets, I., and Evers, C. R.: The wildfire problem in areas
contaminated by the Chernobyl disaster, Sci. Total Environ., 696,
133954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133954" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133954</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Doi, T., Masumoto, K., Toyoda, A., Tanaka, A., Shibata, Y., and Hirose, K.: Anthropogenic radionuclides in the atmosphere observed at Tsukuba: characteristics of the radionuclides derived from Fukushima, J. Environ. Radioact., 122, 55–62, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.02.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.02.001</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Igarashi, Y., Kita, K., Maki, T., Kinase, T., Hayashi, N., Hosaka, K.,
Adachi, K., Kajino, M., Ishizuka, M., Sekiyama, T. T., Zaizen, Y., Takenaka,
C., Ninomiya, K., Okochi, H., and Sorimachi, A.: Fungal spore involvement in
the resuspension of radiocaesium in summer, Sci. Rep.-UK, 9, 1954,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37698-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37698-x</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Igarashi, Y., Kogure, T., Kurihara, Y., Miura, H., Okumura, T., Satou, Y.,
Takahashi, Y. and Yamaguchi, N.: A review of Cs-bearing microparticles in
the environment emitted by the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant
accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 205–206, 101–118,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.04.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.04.011</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Igarashi, Y., Onda, Y., Wakiyama, Y., Konoplev, A., Zheleznyak, M., Lisovyi,
H., Laptev, G., Damiyanovich, V., Samoilov, D., Nanba, K., and Kirieiev, S.:
Impact of wildfire on 137Cs and 90Sr wash-off in heavily contaminated
forests in the Chernobyl exclusion zone, Environ. Pollut., 259, 113764,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113764" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113764</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Ikehara, R., Morooka, K., Suetake, M., Komiya, T., Kurihara, E., Takehara,
M., Takami, R., Kino, C., Horie, K., Takehara, M., Yamasaki, S., Ohnuki, T.,
Law, G. T. W., Bower, W., Grambow, B., Ewing, R. C., and Utsunomiya, S.:
Abundance and distribution of radioactive cesium-rich microparticles
released from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the
environment, Chemosphere, 241, 125019,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125019</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Iwagami, S., Onda, Y., Tsujimura, M., and Abe, Y.: Contribution of
radioactive 137Cs discharge by suspended sediment, coarse organic matter,
and dissolved fraction from a headwater catchment in Fukushima after the
Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 166,
466–474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.025</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Kajino, M., Ishizuka, M., Igarashi, Y., Kita, K., Yoshikawa, C., and Inatsu, M.: Long-term assessment of airborne radiocesium after the Fukushima nuclear accident: re-suspension from bare soil and forest ecosystems, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13149–13172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13149-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13149-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Kajino, M., Adachi, K., Igarashi, Y., Satou, Y., Sawada, M., Thomas
Sekiyama, T., Zaizen, Y., Saya, A., Tsuruta, H. and Moriguchi, Y.:
Deposition and Dispersion of Radio-Cesium Released due to the Fukushima
Nuclear Accident: 2. Sensitivity to Aerosol Microphysical Properties of
Cs-Bearing Microparticles (CsMPs), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033460,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033460" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033460</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Kaneyasu, N., Ohashi, H., Suzuki, F., Okuda, T., and Ikemori, F.: Sulfate
aerosol as a potential transport medium of radiocesium from the fukushima
nuclear accident, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 5720–5726,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es204667h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es204667h</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Kaneyasu, N., Ohashi, H., Suzuki, F., Okuda, T., Ikemori, F., Akata, N., and Kogure, T.: Weak size dependence of resuspended radiocesium adsorbed on soil particles collected after the Fukushima nuclear accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 172, 122–129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.03.001</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Kinase, T., Kita, K., Igarashi, Y., Adachi, K., Ninomiya, K., Shinohara, A.,
Okochi, H., Ogata, H., Ishizuka, M., Toyoda, S., Yamada, K., Yoshida, N.,
Zaizen, Y., Mikami, M., Demizu, H., and Onda, Y.: The seasonal variations of
atmospheric 134,137Cs activity and possible host particles for their
resuspension in the contaminated areas of Tsushima and Yamakiya, Fukushima,
Japan, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 5, 12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0171-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0171-z</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Kita, K., Igarashi, Y., Kinase, T., Hayashi, N., Ishizuka, M., Adachi, K.,
Koitabashi, M., Sekiyama, T. T., and Onda, Y.: Rain-induced bioecological
resuspension of radiocaesium in a polluted forest in Japan, Sci. Rep.-UK,
10, 1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72029-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72029-z</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Kitayama, K., Ohse, K., Shima, N., Kawatsu, K., and Tsukada H.: Regression
model analysis of the decreasing trend of cesium-137 concentration in the
atmosphere since the Fukushima accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 164,
151–157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.015</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Kogure, T., Mukai, H., and Kikuchi, R.: Weathered biotite: A key material of
radioactive contamination in Fukushima, in: Agricultural Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident (III): After 7 years, edited by: Nakanishi, T. M., O'Brien,
M., and Tanoi, K., Springer Open, Singapore,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3218-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3218-0</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Manaka, T., Imamura, N., Kaneko, S., Miura, S., Furusawa, H., and Kanasashi,
T.: Six-year trends in exchangeable radiocesium in Fukushima forest soils,
J. Environ. Radioact., 203, 84–92,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.02.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.02.014</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology): The
manual for analysis of radiocesium, Issue No. 3 of a Series of Manuals for
Measurement of Radioactivity, Japan Chemical Analysis Center, Chiba, Japan, available at
<a href="https://www.kankyo-hoshano.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/No3.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last
access: 8 December 2021),
1976 (in Japanese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Minami, K., Katata, G., Kita, K., Sorimachi, A., Hosaka, K., and Igarashi, Y.: Numerical analyses of transport processes of bioaerosol released from a temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest, Earozoru Kenkyu, 35, 208–218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.11203/jar.35.208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.11203/jar.35.208</a>, 2020 (in Japanese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Miyamoto, Y., Yasuda, K., and Magara, M.: Size distribution of radioactive particles collected at Tokai, Japan 6 days after the nuclear accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 123, 1–7, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.01.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.01.010</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Nakajima, T., Misawa, S., Morino, Y., Tsuruta, H., Goto, D., Uchida, J.,
Takemura, T., Ohara, T., Oura, Y., Ebihara, M., and Satoh, M.: Model
depiction of the atmospheric flows of radioactive cesium emitted from the
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci.,
4, 2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-017-0117-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-017-0117-x</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
NRA (Nuclear Regulation Authority): Airborne Monitoring Results
in each prefecture, available at: <a href="http://radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/en/list/203/list-1.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 January 2022), 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Ochiai, S., Hasegawa, H., Kakiuchi, H., Akata, N., Ueda, S., Tokonami, S.,
and Hisamatsu, S.: Temporal variation of post-accident atmospheric 137Cs in
an evacuated area of Fukushima Prefecture: Size-dependent behaviors of
137Cs-bearing particles, J. Environ. Radioact., 165, 131–139,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.09.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.09.014</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Okuda, T., Isobe, R., Nagai, Y., Okahisa, S., Funato, K., and Inoue, K.:
Development of a high-volume PM<sub>2.5</sub> particle sample using impactor and
cyclone techniques, Aerosol Air Qaul. Res., 15, 759–767,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.09.0194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.09.0194</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Onda, Y., Taniguchi, K., Yoshimura, K., Kato, H., Takahashi, J., Wakiyama,
Y., Coppin, F., and Smith, H.: Radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi
Nuclear Power Plant in terrestrial systems, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1,
644–660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0099-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0099-x</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Petroff, A. and Zhang, L.: Development and validation of a size-resolved particle dry deposition scheme for application in aerosol transport models, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 753–769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-753-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-753-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Sato, Y., Sekiyama, T. T., Fang, S., Kajino, M., Quérel, A., Quélo,
D., Kondo, H., Terada, H., Kadowaki, M., Takigawa, M., Morino, Y., Uchida,
J., Goto, D., and Yamazawa, H.: A model intercomparison of atmospheric
<sup>137</sup>Cs concentrations from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
accident, phase III: Simulation with an identical source term and
meteorological field at 1-km resolution, Atmos. Environ.-X, 7, 100086,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100086" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100086</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Steinhauser, G., Niisoe, T., Harada, K. H., Shozugawa, K., Schneider, S.,
Synal, H. A., Walther, C., Christl, M., Nanba, K., Ishikawa, H., and Koizumi,
A.: Post-Accident Sporadic Releases of Airborne Radionuclides from the
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
14028–14035, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03155</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Takase, T.: Study of the existence form of radioactive cesium – In the case
of fine particles collected from the suburbs of FDNPP, Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research Result Reports (grant number 17K00545), 9 pp.,
available at:
<a href="https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/file/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17K00545/17K00545seika.pdf" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 23 June 2021), 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Takase, T. and Nagahashi, Y.: Determination of major and trace elements in
rock samples by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry -Comparison with a glass
bands and a powder pellets method-, Journal of the Center for Regional
Affairs Fukushima University, 19, 32–47, 2007 (in Japanese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Terada, H., Nagai, H., Tsuduki, K., Furuno, A., Kadowaki, M., and Kakefuda,
T.: Refinement of source term and atmospheric dispersion simulations of
radionuclides during the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident,
J. Environ. Radioact., 213, 106104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106104</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
WHO (World Health Organization): IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Some Internally Deposited Radionuclides, IARC Press, 78, 617 pp., 2001.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Yoshimura, K., Saegusa, J., and Sanada, Y.: Initial decrease in the ambient
dose equivalent rate after the Fukushima accident and its difference from
Chernobyl, Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60847-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60847-0</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
