<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-5685-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Chemical transformation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived organosulfate via
heterogeneous OH oxidation: implications for sources and environmental fates
<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>of atmospheric organosulfates</article-title><alt-title>Chemical transformation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived organosulfate</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Chemical transformation of $\alpha$-pinene-derived organosulfate}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R. Xu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Rongshuang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ng</surname><given-names>Sze In Madeleine</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Chow</surname><given-names>Wing Sze</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7584-5284</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>Yee Ka</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1171-9008</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Yuchen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lai</surname><given-names>Donger</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Zhongping</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>So</surname><given-names>Pui-Kin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Jian Zhen</given-names></name>
          <email>jian.yu@ust.hk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6165-6500</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>Man Nin</given-names></name>
          <email>mnchan@cuhk.edu.hk</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Earth System Science Programme, Faculty of Science, The Chinese
University of Hong Kong,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology, Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Division of Environment and Sustainability, The Hong Kong University
of Science and Technology, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery and
Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong
Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>The University Research Facility in Life Sciences, The Hong Kong
Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>The Institute of Environment, Energy, and Sustainability, The Chinese
University of Hong Kong,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Hong Kong, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jian Zhen Yu (jian.yu@ust.hk) and Man Nin Chan (mnchan@cuhk.edu.hk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>5685</fpage><lpage>5700</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e223">Organosulfur compounds are found to be ubiquitous in atmospheric aerosols
– a majority of which are expected to be organosulfates (OSs). Given the
atmospheric abundance of OSs, and their potential to form a variety of
reaction products upon aging, it is imperative to study the transformation
kinetics and chemistry of OSs to better elucidate their atmospheric fates
and impacts. In this work, we investigated the chemical transformation of an
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived organosulfate (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SNa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249) through heterogeneous OH oxidation at a relative humidity of 50 % in an oxidation flow reactor (OFR). The aerosol-phase reaction products
were characterized using high-performance liquid
chromatography–electrospray ionization–high-resolution mass spectrometry and ion chromatography. By monitoring the decay rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249,
the effective heterogeneous OH reaction rate was measured to be (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
infers an atmospheric lifetime of about 2 weeks at an average OH
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Product
analysis shows that OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 can yield more
oxygenated OSs with a nominal mass-to-charge ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 247
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 263 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 265
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 277 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 279
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 281 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The formation of fragmentation products,
including both small OSs (C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and inorganic sulfates, is found
to be insignificant. These observations suggest that functionalization
reactions are likely the dominant processes and that multigenerational
oxidation possibly leads to formation of products with one or two hydroxyl
and carbonyl functional groups adding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. Furthermore, all
product ions except <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">277</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been detected in laboratory-generated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived secondary organic aerosols as well as in
atmospheric aerosols. Our results reveal that OSs freshly formed from the
photochemical oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene could react further to form OSs
commonly detected in atmospheric aerosols through heterogeneous OH
oxidation. Overall, this study provides more insights into the sources,
transformation, and fate of atmospheric OSs.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e678">Sulfur-containing aerosols are of particular significance for human health
because of their high abundance and significant impacts on regional air
quality and global climate (Bentley et al., 2004; Riva et al., 2015;
Stadtler et al., 2018). The environmental and climatic impacts of
inorganic sulfate aerosols such as sulfate are well known. Recently,
organosulfur compounds originating from terrestrial, marine, and
anthropogenic emissions have also been found to be a significant component
of atmospheric aerosols (Tolocka et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2015; Shakya et
al., 2013, 2015). Organosulfates (OSs) have been found to be the most
important class of organosulfur compounds (Brüggemann et al., 2020) and
can greatly affect aerosol formation and growth by varying their surface
activity, water uptake, and their ability to serve as cloud condensation
nuclei (Hansen et al., 2015; Vogel et al., 2016). Various formation pathways
and precursors of OSs have been identified, including biogenic and
anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as isoprene;
monoterpenes such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene, and limonene;
oxygenated VOCs; and even aromatic compounds (Iinuma et al., 2005, 2007;
Surratt et al., 2008; Kristensen et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012; Riva et
al., 2015). Given their ubiquity and atmospheric significance, it is crucial
to understand the fates and subsequently environmental impacts of OSs.
However, although the formation mechanisms of OSs have been relatively well
investigated, studies on their transformation are limited to a handful of
studies on hydrolysis, and heterogeneous oxidation, mechanisms and kinetics
are not fully understood.</p>
      <p id="d1e695">Ubiquitous in atmospheric aerosols, OSs have been considered relatively
stable over their atmospheric lifetimes and thus used as tracers
(Budisulistiorini et al., 2015). Nonetheless, experiments have shown that
OSs are prone to transformation via hydrolysis and heterogeneous oxidation
by OH. Elrod and co-workers recently reported that OSs can undergo
hydrolysis to form polyols and sulfuric acid at rates subject to the aerosol
acidity and molecular structure of particular OSs (Darer et al., 2011; Hu et
al., 2011). In terms of the structural effects on OS properties and
reactivity, they found that tertiary OSs readily undergo hydrolysis at
relevant atmospheric aerosol pH (0–5) (Craig et al., 2018), which are
reflected by their starkly shorter chemical lifetimes. Specifically, at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the lifetimes of tertiary OSs range from only 0.1 to 19 d,
while those of primary and secondary OSs exceed 104 d against hydrolysis.
In addition, Hu et al. (2011) discovered that the standard-state free
energies of hydrolysis for OSs investigated in their work were negative,
implying that they are only metastable species and possibly not stable
products.</p>
      <p id="d1e708">Oxidation is another potential transformation pathway of OSs, as observed in
previous work on the heterogeneous OH oxidation of OSs (Kwong et al., 2018;
Lam et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020a).
Transformation of OSs, including methylsulfate, ethylsulfate, and
isoprene-derived OSs, proceeds at significant rates with a lifetime of about
1 to 2 weeks, and the proposed mechanism is that the investigated OSs
can be fragmentated into smaller products and sulfate radical anions
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can participate in further reactions to form
inorganic sulfate and other products. Furthermore, while over a hundred OSs
have been detected in atmospheric aerosols, many of them are still
unidentified, with unknown precursors and formation processes. Currently,
reactions whose mechanisms are already understood fail to fully explain the
formation of many OSs detected in atmospheric aerosols. Since it is possible
for a variety of reaction products to be produced from heterogeneous
reactions of OSs, some unidentified OSs (smaller than C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
atmospheric aerosols could be products generated upon further oxidation of
OSs (e.g., 2-methyltetrol sulfates) formed through the photochemical
reactions of VOCs (e.g., isoprene) (Chen et al., 2020). Altogether, previous
laboratory findings have prompted the conjecture that the abundance of OSs
reported in field studies may have been underestimated if their removal
processes have not been properly accounted for. Another significant
implication is the urgency to obtain better understanding of the
transformation of OSs, which can allow a better assessment of the sources
and environmental impacts of atmospheric OSs.</p>
      <p id="d1e742"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene is an atmospherically important biogenic VOC, which can
undergo photochemical oxidation to form secondary organic aerosols (SOAs)
(Kanakidou et al., 2005; Pye et al., 2010; Guenther et al., 2012). OSs have
been found to be among important constituents of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived
SOA in chamber studies and ambient aerosols (Surratt et al., 2008; Stone et
al., 2012; Ma et al., 2014). Field studies reported that a variety of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived OSs can contribute 0.6 %–7.7 % of total sulfate
in atmospheric aerosols (Huang et al., 2015, 2018; Wang et al., 2018,
2021). Here, we conducted a laboratory study to investigate the chemical
transformation of a model <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived OS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249,
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SNa, sodium 2-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo [3.1.1]
heptan-3-yl sulfate) through heterogeneous OH oxidation (Table 1).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 can be formed through the photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene in the presence of acidic sulfate aerosols (Surratt et al., 2008).
Oxidation experiments were performed using an oxidation flow reactor (OFR)
at 50 % RH. After oxidation, aerosols were collected onto Teflon filters
for chemical analysis. The composition of reaction products was
characterized using high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray
ionization–high-resolution mass spectrometry and ion chromatography. We
first quantify oxidation kinetics by obtaining the effective heterogenous OH
oxidation rate constant based on the decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 against OH
exposure. Second, possible transformation pathways are proposed to explain
the formation of the detected products. In particular, we examine whether
ambient OSs and inorganic sulfate could be produced upon heterogeneous OH
oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e839">Information of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived organosulfate
investigated in this work.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="4.7cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="5cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Name</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Synonyms</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sodium 2-hydroxy-2,6,6-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]  <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>heptan-3-yl sulfate</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Formula</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SNa</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Molecular weight (g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">272.29</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chemical structure<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <?xmltex \mrwidth{5cm}?><oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="7"><?xmltex \igopts{width=142.26378pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-g01.png"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OH exposure <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–17.4</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean surface weighted diameter <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>prior to oxidation (nm)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">181.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Effective heterogeneous OH <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>reaction rate constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atmospheric lifetime (d)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e849"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Primary, secondary, and tertiary carbons are circled by red, blue,
and green, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Oxidation experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e1190"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 (in the form of its sodium salt) was synthesized by Yu and
her co-workers (Wang et al., 2017) through the Upjohn dihydroxylation and
sulfation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene. The purity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)
has been tested using liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–high-resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) spectrometry.
Heterogeneous OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 aerosols was carried out
using a 13 L aluminum OFR at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % RH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K. Experimental details together with a schematic diagram (Scheme S1 in the Supplement)
are given in the Supplement. Briefly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 was first
dissolved in deionized water (0.1 wt %) followed by a 30 min sonication.
Aqueous aerosols were generated by passing the solution through an atomizer
(TSI Model 3076) using 3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of nitrogen (N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The aerosol
stream was then directly mixed with ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, dry and humidified nitrogen
(N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to control the RH. A total flow of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was fed into the reactor, corresponding to a residence time of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">156</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s (Xu et al., 2020a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1366">Gas-phase OH radicals were generated by photolyzing O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with UV light at
254 nm in the presence of water vapor inside the OFR. The concentration of
gas-phase OH radicals was varied by changing the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. The
OH exposure, a product of gas-phase OH radical concentration and the
residence time, was in the range of 0–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s. It was determined by measuring the decay of sulfur dioxide
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in independent calibrating experiments (Teledyne SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
analyzer, Model T100) based on the reaction rate between gas-phase OH
radicals and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 298 K (Kang et al., 2007). It acknowledges that the
presence of aerosols did not significantly affect the generation of
gas-phase OH radicals and the determination of OH exposure (less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). The aerosol stream leaving the reactor passed through an annular
Carulite catalyst denuder (manganese dioxide and copper oxide catalyst; Carus
Corp.) and an activated charcoal denuder to remove residual O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
other gas-phase species. Aerosols were collected onto the Teflon filters
(47 mm, 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pore size, Pall Corporation) through filtration at a
sampling flow rate of 3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using an air sampling pump (Gilian 500,
Sensidyne) for 30 min, with a total gas sampling volume of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L. Duplicate filters were collected from each of oxidation experiments
for subsequent chemical analysis. After collection, filters were immediately
stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the dark and analyzed within 3 months. Part of
the remaining stream was introduced into a scanning mobility particle sizer
(SMPS, TSI, CPC Model 3775, Classifier Model 3081) to measure the size
distribution of the aerosols. The aerosol mass was determined from measured
volume concentration assumed for spherical aerosols with a unit density.
Before oxidation, the mean surface weighted diameter for aerosol
distribution was about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">181.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm with a geometric standard
deviation of 1.3, and the aerosol mass loading was measured to be
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Chemical characterization of $\alpha$pOS-249 and OSs
formed upon oxidation}?><title>Chemical characterization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 and OSs
formed upon oxidation</title>
      <p id="d1e1633">Scheme S2 shows the overview of the chemical analysis. First, the
filters were extracted twice with 5 mL methanol in an ultrasonic bath for
1 h. Extracts were then filtered through a 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter and combined. A total of 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
the extract was blown to dryness under a gentle stream of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at room
temperature and then reconstituted in 1 mL methanol–water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
containing 200 ppb D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-octyl sulfate as an internal standard.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>HPLC/ESI-QToF-MS</title>
      <p id="d1e1706">To characterize the reaction products (i.e., OSs), 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of reconstituted extract was injected into an Agilent 1290
UHPLC system equipped with an ESI source interfaced to an Agilent 6540
quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (HPLC/ESI-QToF-MS). Experimental
details have been given elsewhere (Wang et al., 2017, 2021). Sample
injections were first separated using an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Waters, Milford, MA) with mobile phase
consisting of water (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) (eluent A) and methanol (eluent B), each
containing 0.1 % formic acid, at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
gradient elution program was as follows: eluent B initially was set at 5 % for 2.0 min, increased to 95 % in 10.0 min, held for 2 min, and then
decreased to 5 % in the next 0.1 min and held for 2.9 min. The ESI source
was operated in the negative ion mode under following parameters: 2.8 kV for
capillary voltage, 120 V for fragment, 320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for sheath gas
temperature, 8 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for drying gas flow and 45 psi for nebulizer
pressure. Mass spectra were recorded across the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50–1000 at 4 GHz
with a resolution of 40 000 FWHM. The MS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra were also acquired at
a collision energy of 13 eV to validate whether these ions are OSs by
sulfur-containing fragments: SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79.9574</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80.9651</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95.9523</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96.9601</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Surratt et al., 2008; Hettiyadura et
al., 2017). Data were analyzed using Mass Hunter Qualitative software
(version B.07.00 Agilent Technologies).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>HPLC/ESI-QTRAP-MS</title>
      <p id="d1e1949">To quantify the amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249
before and after oxidation, 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of reconstituted extract was injected
into an Agilent 1260 LC system (Palo Alto, CA) interfaced with a QTRAP 4500
mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and a TurbolonSpray
source operated in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode (Wang et al.,
2017, 2021). LC separation was performed using the same column and mobile
phase adopted for HPLC/ESI-QToF-MS. The gradient elution program was set to
be as follows: eluent B initially was set at 1 % for 2.7 min, increased to 54 %
in 17.9 min, and held for 1 min; then increased to 90 % in the next 7.5 min and held for 0.2 min; and finally decreased to 1 % in 1.8 min and
held for 9.3 min. Table S1 in the Supplement shows the parameters optimized for the
mass transition between the deprotonated molecular ion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and bisulfate ion (HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The transition was set to have a dwell time of 100 ms. The scan rate was 200 Da s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The calibration curve was generated using a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 standard
solution (retention time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min) with 200 ppb D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-octyl sulfate
as an internal standard. The extraction efficiency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 was determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % by measuring the
recovery of a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 standard spiked into blank filters. The
uncertainty associated with the quantification of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 is
discussed in the Supplement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Quantification of inorganic sulfate formed upon oxidation</title>
      <p id="d1e2113">The amount of inorganic sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed upon oxidation was
quantified using the IC method. Operating conditions have been given by Huang et
al. (2018). Briefly, the filters were extracted using 5 mL of double
de-ionized water (18.2 M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the ultrapure water system
(Nanopure Diamond UV/UF) and were sonicated for 60 min and then mechanically
shaken for 60 min. After filtering, these extracts were subsequently
analyzed by an ion chromatograph (Dionex ICS-1100). The separation of anions
was accomplished using an AS11-HC analytical column (IonPac, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) and an AG11-HC guard column (IonPac, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) with 15 mmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> NaOH eluent. It is known that bisulfate ion (HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is being converted into SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upon mixing with the alkaline
eluent. The concentration of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantified by the IC method
thus represents a total amount of HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our
previous study has shown that the peak from the Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> standard
has the same retention time in the IC chromatogram as that of the sodium
bisulfate (NaHSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard (Xu et al., 2020a). Furthermore, the
responses of the NaHSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> standards are about the
same. These would justify the use of the Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> standard for the
quantification of HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this work, the
amount of HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced upon oxidation at
a given OH exposure was proportional to its peak area in the chromatogram
and was determined using the Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> standard calibration curve.
The extraction efficiency was determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % by
measuring the recovery of the Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> standard spiked onto blank
filters. The uncertainty for the measurement of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
discussed in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e2477">We also note that no distinct peak was detected in the ion chromatogram for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 standard while a small peak corresponding to
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed. The absence of an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 peak could be
attributed to IC detection for ionic and ionizable species likely being limited to small compounds (up to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Surratt et al., 2008;
Domingos et al., 2012). The presence of a SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak may be due to
the hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. However, this peak comprised <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the total mass, suggesting that the hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 was not significant. This observation is consistent with the
literature that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 does not readily undergo hydrolysis (Hu et
al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e2574">The high recovery of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 suggests the sample preparation and
extraction methods are effective. Wang et al. (2017) have also reported that
there was no degradation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 after 2 years of storage at
low temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). A recent study by Hughes et al. (2019)
examined the stability of a range of OSs (e.g., methyl sulfate,
hydroxyacetone sulfate, two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived OSs: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">279</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">281</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on filters frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
over 1 year. The filters were extracted via a similar procedure to that applied in
this study, and the extracts were analyzed by HPLC-ESI-HRMS. They found that
the investigated OSs with different functional groups (e.g., alkyl,
carboxylate, and hydroxyl groups) showed no degradation during the storage.
Taken together, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 and its oxidation products (i.e., OSs) which
have similar carbon skeletons while possessing different functional groups
(alcohol and/or ketone) are likely stable during the storage and
pre-treatment processes for chemical analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e2758">We note that organic compounds such as carbonyls and carboxylic acids could
undergo reactions with methanol during extraction, storage, and possibly
during the electrospray process (Bateman et al., 2008). For instance, Bateman
et al. (2008) suggested carboxylic acids could react with methanol to form
esters and with carbonyls to hemiacetals and acetals. We checked the
presence and relative abundance of these potential products (to that of our
precursor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249) in our aerosol mass spectra. At the maximum OH
exposure, only a few products that could be potentially formed from the
reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 with methanol were detected, and they had
negligible intensities. This would suggest that the influence of methanol is
not significant on the identification of the major reaction products.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e2784">Figure 1 shows the total ion chromatogram (TIC) characterized by
HPLC/ESI-QToF-MS for the OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. Before oxidation
(Fig. 1a), a single dominant peak corresponds to the deprotonated
molecular ion ([M–H]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">249</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Upon oxidation at an OH exposure of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s (Fig. 1b),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 remains the dominant peak, accompanied by the appearance of
some new product peaks in small intensity relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249.
Fig. 2 shows the extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of the ions
that are observed in the chromatograms after oxidation. Six product ions are
detected upon oxidation and correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 263 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 265
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 277 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 279
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 281
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A mass tolerance was set to less than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm for assigning the chemical formula of the detected
ions. On the basis of the chemical formulas, the ions that are
detected are suggested to be OSs (Table 2). As shown in
Fig. S1 in the Supplement, MS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra show these ions fragmented into sulfur-containing
ions (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79.9574</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80.9651</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96.9601</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) and further confirmed the
identity of these ions as OSs (Surratt et al., 2008; Hettiyadura et al.,
2017; Wang et al., 2017, 2021). It may not be surprising that
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95.9523</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was not observed in these
MS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra since it is likely originated from the fragmentation of
tertiary OSs (Surratt et al., 2008).</p><?xmltex \setfigures?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3329">The total ion chromatograms (TIC) characterized by
HPLC/ESI-QToF-MS before and after heterogeneous OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3345">Control experiments were also conducted to investigate the effects of
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and UV light on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. Figure S2 shows
that the impacts of UV photolysis and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reactivity on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 are not significant (less than 5 % change in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 signal in UV-only and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-only experiments). Similar results
have been observed for other OSs (e.g., methylsulfate, ethylsulfate,
2-methyltetrol sulfate, and 3-methyltetrol sulfate) that these OSs do not
react with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and photolyze at UV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">254</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (Kwong et al., 2018; Lam
et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020a).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3420">Comparison of reaction products formed upon heterogeneous
OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 with the laboratory and field studies.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chemical formula</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" colsep="1">This work </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col6" align="center">Previous studies </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>M-H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Retention</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Detected</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ambient</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Suggested</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(theoretical</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">time</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mass</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mean</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Laboratory</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">chemical structure</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">mass)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(min)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(error)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">concentration</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">experiment</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">reported in</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">the literature</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.860</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">247.0648</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OH/high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Not known</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(247.0646)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(0.8095)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">highly acidic</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">sulfate aerosols<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.992;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.479;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">263.0600</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.114<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Not observed</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Not known</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(263.0595)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.787;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(1.9007)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.028;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.227</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.283;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene/</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="6"><?xmltex \igopts{width=85.358268pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-g02.png"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.798;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">OH/high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.420;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">265.0762</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.076<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">highly acidic</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(265.0751)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.269;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(4.1498)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">sulfate aerosols<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.408;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.563;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Pinonaldehyde/acidic</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.740</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">sulfate aerosols<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.117</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">277.0399</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Not observed</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Not observed</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Not known</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(277.0387)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(4.3315)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.916;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="3"><?xmltex \igopts{width=85.358268pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-g03.png"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.384;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">279.0545</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">/OH/high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(279.0544)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.551;</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(0.3584)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">highly acidic</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.698</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">sulfate aerosols<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" morerows="3"><?xmltex \igopts{width=56.905512pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-g04.png"/></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.452</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">281.0709</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">/OH/high-NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(281.0700)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(3.2020)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">highly acidic</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">sulfate aerosols<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3430"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The retention time in bold corresponds to the major peak in each
EIC, and only corresponding detected mass with mass errors (calculated in
ppm) for these major peaks are listed for simplification. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> These
values were measured by the HPLC-triple quadrupole(TQ)-MS using sodium octyl
sulfate as surrogate for quantification (Ma et al., 2014). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> These
values were measured by the HPLC- triple quadrupole(TQ)-MS using
hydroxyacetone sulfate as surrogate for quantification (Hettiyadura et al.,
2019). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Same ion has been detected in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived
SOA formed from the photochemical oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene in chamber
studies (Surratt et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2014). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Same ion has been detected in the reactive uptake of pinonaldehyde on acidic
sulfate aerosols (Liggio et al., 2006). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Chemical structure proposed
by Liggio et al. (2006). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Chemical structure proposed by Surratt et
al. (2008). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Chemical structure proposed by Hettiyadura et al. (2019).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4503">The extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of the ions
associated with reaction products formed upon heterogeneous OH oxidation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 at the highest OH exposure by HPLC/ESI-QToF-MS with mass
tolerance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm to their theoretical masses (shown).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Oxidation kinetics</title>
      <p id="d1e4536">As shown in Fig. 3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 decays at a
significant rate upon oxidation. Approximately 30 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249
remains unreacted at the highest OH exposure. Oxidation kinetics can be
quantified by measuring the decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 at different OH
exposures. The normalized decay can be fit with an exponential function
(Smith et al., 2009):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M338" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 quantified by
HPLC/ESI-QTRAP-MS at a given OH exposure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration before
oxidation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective second-order heterogeneous OH rate constant, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the OH exposure. The rate constant determined using
Eq. (1) is found to be (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming a 24 h averaged [OH] of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mao et al., 2009), the
atmospheric lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 against heterogeneous OH oxidation,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d. Considering
atmospheric aerosols with a similar size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>200 nm) having a typical
lifetime of 10–14 d against wet or dry deposition (Kanakidou et al.,
2005), heterogeneous OH oxidation could be a competitive sink for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. Lam et al. (2019) and Chen et al. (2020) recently reported that
isoprene-derived OSs (i.e., 2-methyltetrol sulfate and 3-methyltetrol
sulfate) can undergo heterogeneous OH oxidation efficiently. Altogether,
these results may suggest that transformation kinetics and pathways would
need to be considered in chemical transport models in order to better
predict the abundance and composition of atmospheric OSs.</p>
      <p id="d1e4784">In this study, the heterogenous OH reactivity of aqueous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249
aerosols at a single RH (50 %) was investigated. In the atmosphere, the
complex interplay between aerosol phase state (e.g., solid or aqueous),
morphology, and the types and concentrations of salts could significantly
alter the heterogenous OH reaction kinetics and mechanisms under different
environmental conditions (e.g., RH and temperature).</p>
      <p id="d1e4794">The aerosol physical state can play a key role in determining the
heterogeneous kinetics and chemistry of pure organic aerosols (Koop et al.,
2011; Shiraiwa et al., 2011, 2013; Chan et al., 2014). For instance, Chan et
al. (2014) reported that aqueous succinic acid aerosols reacted about 40 times faster than in solid aerosols towards heterogeneous OH oxidation. These
could be explained by the more rapid diffusion of succinic acid to the
surface of aqueous droplets for oxidation than solid aerosols. Moreover, for
aqueous droplets, aerosol water content can vary considerably, depending on
atmospheric conditions. The change in aerosol-phase water and solute
concentrations would influence the reactivity by varying aerosol viscosity
(Slade and Knopf, 2014; Chim et al., 2017; Marshall et al., 2016, 2018). For
instance, oxidation kinetics in highly concentrated aqueous organic aerosols
are found to be much slower than those in diluted ones. This is because
aerosol viscosity generally increases with the solute concentration, thereby
slowing down the diffusion of organic molecules within the aerosol and
lowering the overall reactivity.</p>
      <p id="d1e4797">Atmospheric aerosols are comprised of organic compounds, inorganic salts, and
many other species. To date, large uncertainty remains in how inorganic
salts alter the heterogeneous kinetics and chemistry (McNeill et al., 2007,
2008; Dennis-Smither et al., 2012). A few laboratory studies have revealed
that the presence of dissolved inorganic ions (e.g., ammonium sulfate) can
reduce the heterogeneous OH reactivity of organic compounds but does not
significantly alter the reaction mechanisms (Mungall et al., 2017; Kwong et
al., 2018; Lam et al., 2019). More recently, Xu et al. (2020b) reported that
the change in the heterogeneous reactivity strongly depends on the
concentration of organic compounds and inorganic salts. They found that the
rate of the reactions decreases when the organic-to-inorganic mass ratio
(OIR) decreases. This could be explained by the colliding probability
between OH radical and organic species at the aerosol surface becoming lower
in the presence of salt, resulting in a smaller overall reaction rate. We
also acknowledge that different inorganic ions could have different
propensity for air–aerosol interface depending on their polarizability and
interactions with other components (Jungwirth and Tobias, 2002;
Gopalakrishnan et al., 2005). Jungwirth and Tobias (2002) investigated the
preference of sodium cation and chlorine anion to the interface or bulk in
sea salt aerosols based on polarizable MD simulation. They found that
chlorine anion has a stronger propensity for the interface than sodium
cation and is proportional to its polarizability. Therefore, the types and
concentration of inorganic ions (e.g., ionic strength) within aerosol could
potentially alter the overall heterogeneous kinetics and reaction pathways.
To date, it remains an open question whether the salts alter heterogeneous
reactivity chemically, physically, or both.</p>
      <p id="d1e4801">We would like to note that additional uncertainties in heterogeneous
reactivity of organic compounds in the presence of inorganic salts could
also arise when these organic–inorganic droplets undergo phase separation,
depending on environmental conditions and aerosol composition (e.g., different types of inorganic salts, the average oxygen-to-carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
elemental ratio of organic compounds, and OIR) (You et al., 2014; Qiu and
Molinero, 2015; Freedman, 2017, 2020). These phase-separated droplets
typically exhibit two distinct liquid phases: an inorganic-rich inner phase
and an organic-rich outer phase. Different morphologies have also been
observed (e.g., core–shell morphology, partially engulfed morphology, and
transitions between different types of morphology). Lam et al. (2021)
recently reported that phase-separated organic–inorganic droplets have a
slightly higher reactivity towards gas-phase OH radicals, compared to
single-phase ones. As phase separation occurred, an uneven distribution of
organic species within the droplets increased the collision probability
between organic molecules and OH radicals at or near the droplet surface.
Overall, further studies emphasizing the effects of aerosol composition,
phase transition and separation, and morphologies on heterogeneous
reactivity of OSs are needed to better understand their transformation rates
and chemistry.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4818">The normalized decay of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 upon
heterogeneous OH oxidation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=162.180709pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Reaction mechanism</title><?xmltex \setfigures?><?xmltex \setschemes?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Scheme}?><label>Scheme 1</label><caption><p id="d1e4845">Formation mechanisms tentatively proposed for the
formation of more oxygenated C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> OSs and inorganic sulfate upon
heterogeneous OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-s01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4870">Scheme 1 shows the proposed formation pathways for the
detected products summarized in Table 2. Prior to oxidation,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 tends to dissociate readily. Oxidation is initiated via
hydrogen abstraction by an OH radical, forming an alkyl radical
(R<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), which reacts with an oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule quickly to
form a peroxy radical (RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which can react via different
pathways. For instance, the reactions of two RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
generate two carbonyl products via the Bennett and Summers mechanism
(Reaction R1) (Bennett and Summers, 1974) or an alcohol product and a carbonyl
product via Russell reactions (Reaction R2) (Russell, 1957), or two alkoxy
radicals (RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can react with an O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule
(Reaction R3), undergo intermolecular hydrogen abstraction (Reaction R4),
and/or decompose involving the cleavage of a C-C bond or a C-O bond (George
and Abbatt, 2010; Carrasquillo et al., 2015; Kroll et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e4947">

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M368" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ROH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decomposition</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e5145">Based on detected products (Table 2 and Fig. 2), OH
oxidation tends to increase the functionalities and oxygen content of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. Moreover, these products (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OSs) can be
classified as functionalization products and are formed via the addition of
one or two oxygenated functional groups to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. For instance,
ions corresponding to first-generation products produced from OH oxidation
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 are detected at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">263</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 265 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
When the oxidation proceeds, these products can react with OH radicals to
form second-generation products, which give <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">277</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 279 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
281 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> products.</p><?xmltex \setfigures?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5411">The evolution in the signal intensity of the reaction
products formed upon the heterogeneous OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 as a
function of OH exposure.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5427">Figure 4 shows the evolution of the intensity of the reaction
products as a function of OH exposure. Different kinetic profiles have been
observed for first- and second-generation products. It can be seen that
first-generation products (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">263</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 265
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reach a maximum intensity at an OH
exposure of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s. Their
intensities then decrease slightly at the highest OH exposure. The
concentration of second-generation products (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">277</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 279 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
281 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows a different kinetic profile.
At low OH exposures, the intensities of the products are observed to
increase at a slightly slower rate relative to first-generation products.
Their concentrations always increase with increasing OH exposure and reach
their maximum values at the highest OH exposure. This trend is consistent
with the multigenerational reactions that the formation of second-generation
products is from the reactions of OH with first-generation products. In
general, the products detected, shown in Table 2, are consistent
with reactions (described in detail below) that form hydroxyl and carbonyl
functional groups.</p>
      <p id="d1e5692">During oxidation, the carbon site where the hydrogen atom is abstracted by
OH radical governs the following formation of products. More recently,
molecular dynamics (MD) simulations showed that heterogeneous reaction is
likely not initiated by the direct collision between a gas-phase OH radical
and an organic molecule near the aerosol surface (Xu et al., 2020b; Lam et
al., 2021). Instead, the reaction may occur after a number of collisions
between the absorbed OH radical and the organic molecule. As a first
approximation, the reactivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 towards OH radical is
estimated by a structure–activity relationship (SAR) model proposed for
aqueous-phase OH reactions with organic compounds (Monod and Doussin, 2008).
We acknowledge that the SAR model does not include the parameterization of
the sulfate group (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for OSs. As the sulfate group
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits a resonance electron-withdrawing effect (Bahl
and Bahl, 2010) as the carboxylate anion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>COO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and bears a negative
charge, here the effect of the sulfate group on the OH reactivity is
evaluated using the descriptor of the carboxylate anion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>COO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the SAR model. Overall, the goal of this simple analysis is to qualitatively
assess which carbon site is more favorable for hydrogen abstraction in
reactions of OH radicals with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 in order to gain more insights
into the reaction mechanisms.</p>
      <p id="d1e5794">Table S2 shows the reactivity of a hydrogen atom at different
reaction sites upon OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. The model predicts
that the hydrogen abstraction likely occurred at two secondary carbons
(4-C and 7-C) and a tertiary carbon (3-C), in which the abstraction rates
were significantly larger than other sites. For instance, the largest
hydrogen abstraction rate is predicted to occur at a secondary carbon site
(4-C). This could be explained by the electron donor effect of the
carboxylate anion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>COO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> position when the OH
attacks the reactive site as an electrophilic reaction (Monod and Doussin,
2008). A comparable rate is predicted for a tertiary carbon (3-C) as the
adjacent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> groups exhibit significant
electron donor properties. A large abstraction rate for 7-C could also be
due to strong electron-donating effect of surrounding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-CH groups. The model suggests a large difference in the OH reactivity for the
three tertiary carbon sites (1-C, 3-C, and 5-C). For instance, the slowest
abstraction rate is predicted for 5-C. This could be attributed to a combined
effect of the resonance electron-withdrawing effect of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-carboxylate anion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>COO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group and the field electron-withdrawing
effect of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-OH group. The slow abstraction rate predicted for 1-C
could be due to the field electron withdrawing effect of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-OH
group. In general, the OH reactivity for the primary carbons (8-C, 9-C, and
11-C) and hydroxyl group (10-O) were predicted to be slower than that of the
secondary and tertiary carbons except 5-C. We would like to acknowledge that
uncertainties could arise from the fact that the sulfate group (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is currently not being considered in the SAR model and differences between
the concentrated aqueous aerosols and the SAR model that is formulated for
dilute aqueous solutions. Other factors such as steric hindrance and
long-distance electronic effects of the sulfate group (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
on the reactivity have not been considered (Yamazaki et al., 2019) and warrant further study.</p>
      <p id="d1e5959">Depending on the initial reaction site, a number of first-generation
products with various structural isomers can be formed as indicated by
multiple peaks observed in the EICs of detected ions (Fig. 2).
Different isomers of second-generation products can also be formed from the
reactions of OH with first-generation products. The possible formation
pathways of detected products are further discussed below. Given a number of
reaction pathways could possibly lead to the formation of the products with
different isomers, only a general reaction scheme is depicted in
Scheme 1 for simplicity and clarity.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>First-generation products</title>
      <p id="d1e5969"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">263</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Upon oxidation, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is likely formed via an
addition of a carbonyl functional group to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">249</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the hydrogen abstraction by an OH
radical from a primary or a secondary carbon instead of a tertiary carbon
(Scheme 1). Depending on different initial reaction sites (4-C,
7-C, 8-C, 9-C, and 11-C), five structural isomers of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> could be possibly formed from the
cross-reactions of two RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via Bennett and Summers reactions
(Reaction R1), Russell reactions (Reaction R2), and/or the reactions between
an alkoxy radical with an O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule (Reaction R3).</p>
      <p id="d1e6181"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">265</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is likely formed via an
addition of a hydroxyl functional group to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">249</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upon oxidation as shown in Scheme 1. The addition of a hydroxyl functional group to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 can
possibly occur at all carbons, except the two quaternary carbons (2-C and
6-C) where there is no hydrogen atom available for abstraction. A total of
eight isomers could be possibly formed from the cross-reactions of two
RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via Russell reactions (Reaction R2), and the
intermolecular hydrogen abstraction by alkoxy radicals (Reaction R4).</p>
      <p id="d1e6354">We also note that a product ion at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was detected after oxidation (Fig. 2). One possibility is that this
product might be originated from the transformation of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">265</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Scheme S3 (Path a)
shows that when the hydrogen abstraction occurs at the 1-C, the pinacol
rearrangement of vicinal diols involving a methyl shift and a loss of
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O could be a possible formation pathway (Bruice et al., 2010). This
reaction occurs efficiently under acidic conditions and might not be
favorable in this study since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 aerosols are expected to be
neutral. Another possible pathway involves the isomerization of a hydroxyl
alkyl radical with a ring opening, as shown in Scheme S3 (Path b).
This reaction has been found to be efficient for gas-phase reactions between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and OH radicals (Bergh et al., 2000; Peeters et al., 2001).
Subsequent reactions of the hydroxyl alkyl radical could lead to the
formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through the HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
elimination processes. However, the significance of this reaction in the
aerosol phase requires further investigation.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Second-generation products</title>
      <p id="d1e6565">As shown in Fig. 2, second-generation products with different
isomers are formed through an addition of a carbonyl or a hydroxyl
functional group to first-generation products upon oxidation. For
instance, as shown in Scheme 1,
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">281</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be formed from the further
oxidation of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">265</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with an addition of a
hydroxyl functional group via Reactions (R2) and (R4).
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">277</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be formed from the oxidation
of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">263</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with an addition of a carbonyl
functional group via Reactions (R1)–(R3). Multiple pathways could
potentially lead to the formation of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">279</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For instance, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">279</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be
formed through the addition of a hydroxyl functional group to
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">263</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) via Reactions (R2) and (R4)
and/or the addition of a carbonyl functional group to
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">265</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) via Reactions (R1)–(R3).</p>
      <p id="d1e7002">We note that smaller products and small OSs (C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were not
observed in the mass spectra and ion chromatograms. We do not have a clear
explanation yet, but postulate that upon OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249,
the self- and cross-reactions of peroxy radicals with a cyclic structure tend to
form stable products rather than alkoxy radicals. For instance, in a
theoretical study by Capouet et al. (2004), a smaller branching
ratio (0.3) was assigned to alkoxy radical formation in the
disproportionation reactions of cyclic peroxy radicals (0.7 is assigned for
acyclic peroxy radicals) to reproduce the formation of reaction products
during the photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene by OH radical. Rowley et al. (1992) also reported a low value (0.24) for alkoxy radical formation from
the self-reactions of cyclohexylperoxy radicals. Another possible
explanation is that a higher activation energy is estimated for the
decomposition of an alkoxy radical when it is attached to larger ring
structures (Wilsey et al., 1999). Altogether, the formation and
decomposition of alkoxy radicals might be likely hindered, which may partly
explain the insignificant formation of fragmentation products including
small OSs (C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and inorganic sulfates (Sect. 3.4) upon
OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. This might also suggest that more
oxygenated C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> OSs (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">279</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">281</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) are more likely to have originated from
further OH oxidation of first-generation products (Scheme 1)
without fragmentation processes. For instance, as shown in Scheme S4, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">279</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">281</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) could be formed through a C-C
bond cleavage of RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with a ring opening. The resulting carbonyl
alkyl radical could undergo subsequent reactions, leading to the formation
of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">279</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) via the addition of a
carbonyl group and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">281</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) via
the addition of a hydroxyl group. However, these fragmentation reactions are
expected to be not significant. Further laboratory and modeling
investigations are required to better understand the fates of peroxy and
alkoxy radicals with varying structures in different phases (i.e., gas phase
vs. aerosol phase) and the subsequent formation of reaction products (e.g., smaller OSs) upon oxidation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Heterogeneous OH oxidation of $\alpha$pOS-249 -- a potential source of ambient OSs?}?><title>Heterogeneous OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 – a potential source of ambient OSs?</title>
      <p id="d1e7409">On the basis of reaction products, we attempt to examine whether the
heterogeneous OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 freshly formed from the
photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene could explain the formation of OSs
detected in laboratory-generated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene SOA and ambient aerosols.
As shown in Table 2, five out of six product ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 263,
265, 279, and 281) have been detected in ambient aerosols (Iinuma et al.,
2005; Surratt et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2014; Hettiyadura et al., 2019; Wang
et al., 2021), while four out of six product ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 265, 279, and
281) have been observed for SOA formed from the photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene in the presence of acidic sulfate aerosols in laboratory studies
(Liggio et al., 2006; Surratt et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2014; Zhang et al.,
2015; Hettiyadura et al., 2019). Reaction mechanisms have been proposed for
the formation of some of these products such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">265</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 279 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the literature. For instance, in chamber studies, Liggio et al. (2006)
suggested that C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">265</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be formed
through the reactive uptake of pinonaldehyde, a major semi-volatile product
generated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene oxidation, onto acidic sulfate aerosols via
sulfate esterification reactions. Similar to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">265</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">279</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be produced
through the reactive uptake of hydroxypinoinc acid on acidic sulfate
aerosols via sulfate esterification reactions (Surratt et al., 2008). For
field studies, ions corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">247</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 263 (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
have been observed in ambient aerosols, but their sources and formation
mechanisms have remained unclear. Here, we show that these OSs previously
observed in ambient aerosols and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived SOA in laboratory
studies could be first- and/or second-generation products formed upon
heterogeneous OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Formation of inorganic sulfate upon oxidation</title>
      <p id="d1e7859">Recent studies have reported that heterogeneous OH oxidation of small OSs
(C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can produce inorganic sulfates (Kwong et
al., 2018; Lam et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020a). It has
been proposed that the decomposition of an alkoxy radical formed at the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-position of the sulfate group can generate a sulfate radical anion
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which subsequently reacts further to generate
inorganic sulfur species (HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Schemes 1 and S4). We here examine the significance
of this conversion from organosulfur to inorganic sulfur upon heterogeneous
OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 (a C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>OS). Figure S3 shows
the IC chromatograms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 before and after heterogenous OH
oxidation. Before oxidation (Fig. S3a), a small quantity of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (contributing only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of total sulfur
mass) was detected in the ion chromatogram due to the hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249, which has been corrected for the determination of sulfate yield.
After oxidation (Fig. S3b), an increase in the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>signal was observed, suggesting that some sulfur is being converted from
its organic form (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249) into its inorganic form
(HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upon OH oxidation. The amount of
inorganic sulfur formed from oxidation was then quantified to calculate the
yield, defined as the total number of moles of HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formed per mole of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 reacted at a given OH
exposure (Xu et al., 2020a):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Rx1" content-type=" reaction"><mml:math id="M645" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yield</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pOS</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">249</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was quantified by IC, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 concentration was determined by HPLC/ESI-QTRAP-MS before
and after oxidation. As shown in Fig. 5, the yields are determined
to be small as indicated by the small SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak detected after
oxidation and range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at OH exposure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s. The relatively large uncertainty
at low OH exposures is mainly attributed to the small change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at low OH exposures (the
determination of uncertainties of the yield is given in the Supplement). The small yields could be explained by the fact that the hydrogen
abstraction at 5-C is likely not favorable compared to other carbon sites
upon OH oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 at the first place as predicted by the
SAR model (Table S2). The generation of sulfate radical anions
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via the breakage of the C-O bond in the 5-C alkoxy
radical and the further reaction of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to generate
inorganic sulfates might not be favorable (Schemes 1 and S4).
Furthermore, we cannot rule out the possibility that the formation of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be from the hydrolysis of reaction products, as some
secondary and tertiary OS could readily undergo hydrolysis and may form upon
oxidation.</p>
      <p id="d1e8365">It is also worthwhile to note that upon oxidation, the decomposition of
alkoxy radicals (RO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) formed at 5-C would lead to
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a fragmentation product. For instance, a
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aldehyde product (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">167</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be formed
(Scheme 1). The effective saturation vapor pressure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of this
product is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based
on its saturation vapor pressure (3.29 Pa) predicted from EVAPORATION
(Compernolle et al., 2011). The volatility of this product is found to be
about 5 orders of magnitude larger than that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is estimated using a saturation vapor pressure
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.96</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pa) predicted by COSMOtherm (Hyttinen et al.,
2020). Given its high volatility, this fragmentation product likely
partitions back to the gas phase and has not been detected in our chemical
analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e8558">Molar yields of inorganic sulfur species (HSO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of OH exposure upon heterogeneous OH
oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-error bars represent the uncertainties
for OH exposures and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-error bars represent the uncertainties of derived
molar yields (calculation details can be referred to the Supplement).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=162.180709pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5685/2022/acp-22-5685-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Atmospheric implications</title>
      <p id="d1e8631">To date, while the formation mechanisms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene-derived OSs have
been investigated, their transformation pathways have remained unclear.
Nonetheless, several laboratory studies have documented the chemical removal
pathways of several OSs through oxidation, implying that certain OSs are not
chemically stable and have the propensity for transformation to other
organic or inorganic species via oxidation. In this work, we investigated
the oxidative transformation process of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 via heterogeneous
oxidation initiated by OH radicals. Kinetic data suggest that heterogeneous
OH oxidation is a competitive sink for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. Oxidation reactions
dominantly involve the addition of hydroxyl and carbonyl functional groups,
which increases the functionalities and oxygen content of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249
during multigenerational oxidation steps. The formation of fragmentation
products such as inorganic sulfates and smaller OSs was found to be
insignificant. All these results indicate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249s and other
OSs may not be chemically stable in the atmosphere and can be continuously
transformed once formed in the atmosphere. In particular, heterogeneous OH
oxidation of OSs could yield some previously unexplained OSs that are
detected in atmospheric aerosols. We also acknowledge that the small yields
reported for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249 are different from our previous studies and that a
significant amount of inorganic sulfates (yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) were
formed upon heterogeneous OH oxidation of a small OS (i.e., methylsulfate,
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kwong et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2020a). This might
be attributed to the fact that for the OH reaction with methylsulfate, only a few
hydrogen atoms are available for the abstraction. The formation and
decomposition of an alkoxy radical formed at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> position of the
sulfate group are more likely to occur, leading to sulfate radical anion
(SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and subsequently inorganic sulfates. These results
reveal that the sulfur conversion from its organic form (i.e., OSs) to
inorganic form (i.e., inorganic sulfates) upon oxidation could be sensitive
to the molecular structure of OSs (e.g., carbon chain length and
functionality). Future investigations are needed to better elucidate the
formation and isomer distribution of multigenerational functionalization and
fragmentation products formed upon oxidation. Lastly, smaller products and
smaller OSs (C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were not detected upon oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249. Future investigations are desired to investigate whether the
chemical transformation and aging of larger OSs could be the sources of
smaller OSs in the atmosphere through various atmospheric processes.
Overall, the findings of this work provide an improved understanding of the
sources, fates, and transformations of ambient OSs.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e8760">Data are available upon request from the
corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e8763">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5685-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5685-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e8772">RX and MNC
designed the experiments. RX and SIMN ran
the experiments. YW provided the synthesized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>pOS-249
standard. WSC, YKW, ZY, DL, PKS, and JZY helped with the chemical analysis. YW and JZY
contributed to the formulation of the reaction mechanisms. RX,
SIMN, and MNC prepared the paper. JZY
and MNC edited the paper. All authors provided comments and
suggestions for the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e8785">The contact authors have declared that neither
they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e8791">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e8797">This work is supported by the Hong Kong Research
Grants Council (grant nos. 14300118 and 16304519).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e8802">This research has been supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (grant nos. 14300118 and 16304519).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e8808">This paper was edited by Alex Huffman and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bahl, A. and Bahl, B. S: Advanced Organic Chemistry, 1st edn., S. Chand Publication, New Delhi, India, ISBN 9788121935159, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bateman, A. P., Walser, M. L., Desyaterik, Y., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and
Nizkorodov, S. A.: The effect of solvent on the analysis of secondary
organic aerosol using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 42, 7341–7346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es801226w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es801226w</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bennett, J. E. and Summers, R.: Product studies of the mutual termination reactions of sec-alkylperoxy radicals: evidence for non-cyclic termination, Can. J. Chem., 52, 1377–1379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/v74-209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/v74-209</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bentley, R. and Chasteen, T. G.: Environmental VOSCs – formation and
degradation of dimethyl sulfide, methanethiol and related materials,
Chemos., 55, 291–317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.12.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.12.017</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bergh, v. d., Vanhees, V. I., de Boer, R., Compernolle, F., and Vinckier, C.:
Identification of the oxidation products of the reaction between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene and hydroxyl radicals by gas and high-performance liquid
chromatography with mass spectrometric detection, J. Chrom. A., 896,
135–148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00680-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00680-4</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brüggemann, M., Xu, R., Tilgner, A., Kwong, K. C., Mutzel, A., Poon, H.
Y., Otto, T., Schaefer, T., Poulain, L., Chan, M. N., and Herrmann, H.:
Organosulfates in ambient aerosol: state of knowledge and future research
directions on formation, abundance, fate, and importance, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 54, 3767–3782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06751.s001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b06751.s001</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bruice, P. Y.: Organic chemistry, 6th edn., Pearson Publication, Lebanon, Indiana, USA, ISBN 9780321663139, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Budisulistiorini, S. H., Li, X., Bairai, S. T., Renfro, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y. J., McKinney, K. A., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Mueller, S., Knote, C., Shaw, S. L., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Examining the effects of anthropogenic emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee ground site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8871–8888, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Capouet, M., Peeters, J., Nozi`ere, B., and Müller, J.-F.: Alpha-pinene oxidation by OH: simulations of laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2285–2311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2285-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2285-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carrasquillo A. J., Daumit K. E., Kroll J. H.: Radical reactivity in the
condensed phase: intermolecular versus intramolecular reactions of alkoxy
radicals, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 6, 2388–2392,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00913" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00913</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chan, M. N., Zhang, H., Goldstein, A. H., and Wilson, K. R.: Role of water
and phase in the heterogeneous oxidation of solid and aqueous succinic acid
aerosol by hydroxyl radicals, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 28978–28992,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5012022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp5012022</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Lambe, A. T., Xu, R., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Zhang, Z.,
Szalkowski, T., Cui, T., Vizuete, W., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P.,
Chan, M. N., and Surratt, J. D.: Heterogeneous hydroxyl radical oxidation of
isoprene-epoxydiol-derived methyltetrol sulfates: plausible formation
mechanisms of previously unexplained organosulfates in ambient fine
aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol. Letters, 7, 460–468,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00276.s001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00276.s001</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chim, M. M., Chow, C. Y., Davies, J. F., and Chan, M. N.: Effects of relative
humidity and particle phase water on the heterogeneous OH oxidation of
2-methylglutaric acid aqueous droplets, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 1666–1674,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11606</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Compernolle, S., Ceulemans, K., and Müller, J.-F.: EVAPORATION: a new vapour pressure estimation methodfor organic molecules including non-additivity and intramolecular interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9431–9450, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9431-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9431-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Craig, R. L., Peterson, P. K., Nandy, L., Lei, Z., Hossain, M. A., Camarena,
S., Dodson, R. A., Cook, R. D., Dutcher, C. S., and Ault, A. P.: Direct
determination of aerosol pH: size-resolved measurements of submicrometer and
supermicrometer aqueous particles, Anal. Chem., 90, 11232–11239,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00586</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Darer, A. I., Cole-Filipiak, N. C., O'Connor, A. E., and Elrod, M. J.:
Formation and stability of atmospherically relevant isoprene-derived
organosulfates and organonitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1895–1902,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103797z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es103797z</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dennis-Smither, B. J., Miles, R. E. H., and Reid, J. P.: Oxidative aging of
mixed oleic acid/sodium chlo-ride aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D20204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018163" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018163</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Domingos, J. S. S., Regis, C. D., Santos, V. S., Andrade, B., and Rocha, O.: A
comprehensive and suitable method for determining major ions from
atmospheric particulate matter matrices, J. Chrom. A., 1266, 17–23,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.074</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Freedman, M. A.: Phase separation in organic aerosol, Chem. Soc. Rev., 46,
7694–7705,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00783J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C6CS00783J</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Freedman, M. A.: Liquid–liquid phase separation in supermicrometer and
submicrometer aerosol particles, Acc. Chem. Res., 53, 1102–1110,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00093</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>George, I. J. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous oxidation of atmospheric
aerosol particles by gas-phase radicals, Nat. Chem., 2, 713–722,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.806" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nchem.806</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gopalakrishnan, S., Jungwirth, P., Tobias, D. J., and Allen, H. C.: Air–Liquid
Interfaces of Aqueous Solutions Containing Ammonium and Sulfate:
Spectroscopic and Molecular Dynamics Studies, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109,
8861–8872, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hansen, A. M. K., Hong, J., Raatikainen, T., Kristensen, K., Ylisirniö, A., Virtanen, A., Petäjä, T., Glasius, M., and Prisle, N. L.: Hygroscopic properties and cloud condensation nuclei activation of limonene-derived organosulfates and their mixtures with ammonium sulfate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 14071–14089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-14071-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-14071-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Jayarathne, T., Baumann, K., Goldstein, A. H., de Gouw, J. A., Koss, A., Keutsch, F. N., Skog, K., and Stone, E. A.: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of atmospheric organosulfates in Centreville, Alabama, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1343–1359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1343-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1343-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Al-Naiema, I. M., Hughes, D. D., Fang, T., and Stone, E. A.: Organosulfates in Atlanta, Georgia: anthropogenic influences on biogenic secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3191–3206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3191-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3191-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, K. S., Darer, A. I., and Elrod, M. J.: Thermodynamics and kinetics of the hydrolysis of atmospherically relevant organonitrates and organosulfates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8307–8320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8307-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8307-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, D. D., Li, Y. J., Lee, B. P., and Chan, C. K.: Analysis of organic
sulfur compounds in atmospheric aerosols at the HKUST supersite in Hong Kong
using HR-ToF-AMS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3672–3679,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5056269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es5056269</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, R.-J., Cao, J., Chen, Y., Yang, L., Shen, J., You, Q., Wang, K., Lin, C., Xu, W., Gao, B., Li, Y., Chen, Q., Hoffmann, T., O'Dowd, C. D., Bilde, M., and Glasius, M.: Organosulfates in atmospheric aerosol: synthesis and quantitative analysis of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from Xi'an, northwestern China, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3447–3456, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3447-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-3447-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hughes, D. D. and Stone, E. A.: Organosulfates in the Midwestern United
States: Abundance, composition and stability, Environ. Chem., 16, 312–322,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN18260" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN18260</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hyttinen, N., Elm, J., Malila, J., Calderón, S. M., and Prisle, N. L.: Thermodynamic properties of isoprene- and monoterpene-derived organosulfates estimated with COSMOtherm, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5679–5696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5679-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-5679-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., Miao, Y., Sierau, B., Gnauk, T., and Herrmann, H.:
Laboratory studies on secondary organic aerosol formation from terpenes,
Faraday Discuss., 130, 279–294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b502160j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b502160j</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Müller, C., Berndt, T., Böge, O., Claeys, M., and Herrmann, H.: Evidence for the existence of
organosulfates from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene ozonolysis in ambient secondary organic
aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6678–6683,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070938t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es070938t</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jungwirth P. and Tobias D. J.: Ions at the Air/Water Interface, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 106, 6361–6373, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp020242g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp020242g</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J., Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J., Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat, G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E., Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kang, E., Root, M. J., Toohey, D. W., and Brune, W. H.: Introducing the concept of Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5727–5744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koop, T., Bookhold, J., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Glass transition
and phase state of organic compounds: Dependency on molecular properties and
implications for secondary organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 13, 19238–19255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP22617G" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C1CP22617G</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kristensen, K. and Glasius, M.: Organosulfates and oxidation products from
biogenic hydrocarbons in fine aerosols from a forest in Northwest Europe
during spring, Atmos. Environ., 45, 4546–4556,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.063</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kroll, J., Lim, C., Kessler, S., and Wilson, K.: Heterogeneous oxidation of
atmospheric organic aerosol: kinetics of changes to the amount and oxidation
state of particle-phase organic carbon, J. Phys. Chem. A., 119,
10767–10783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b06946" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.5b06946</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kwong, K. C., Chim, M. M., Davies, J. F., Wilson, K. R., and Chan, M. N.: Importance of sulfate radical anion formation and chemistry in heterogeneous OH oxidation of sodium methyl sulfate, the smallest organosulfate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2809–2820, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2809-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-2809-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lam, H. K., Kwong, K. C., Poon, H. Y., Davies, J. F., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Surratt, J. D., and Chan, M. N.: Heterogeneous OH oxidation of isoprene-epoxydiol-derived organosulfates: kinetics, chemistry and formation of inorganic sulfate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2433–2440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2433-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-2433-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lam, H. K., Xu, R., Choczynski, J., Davies, J. F., Ham, D., Song, M., Zuend, A., Li, W., Tse, Y.-L. S., and Chan, M. N.: Effects of liquid–liquid phase separation and relative humidity on the heterogeneous OH oxidation of inorganic–organic aerosols: insights from methylglutaric acid and ammonium sulfate particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2053–2066, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2053-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-2053-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liggio, J. and Li, S.-M.: Organosulfate Formation during the uptake of
pinonaldehyde on acidic sulfate aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13808,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl026079</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, Y., Xu, X., Song, W., Geng, F., and Wang, L.: Seasonal and Diurnal
Variations of Particulate Organosulfates in Urban Shanghai, China, Atmos.
Environ., 85, 152–160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.017</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mao, J., Ren, X., Brune, W. H., Olson, J. R., Crawford, J. H., Fried, A., Huey, L. G., Cohen, R. C., Heikes, B., Singh, H. B., Blake, D. R., Sachse, G. W., Diskin, G. S., Hall, S. R., and Shetter, R. E.: Airborne measurement of OH reactivity during INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 163–173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-163-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-163-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marshall, F. H., Miles, R. E. H., Song, Y.-C., Ohm, P. B., Power, R. M., Reid, J. P., and Dutcher, C. S.: Diffusion and reactivity in ultra-viscous aerosol and the correlation with particle viscosity, Chem. Sci., 7, 1298–1308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sc03223g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c5sc03223g</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marshall, F. H., Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., Nandy, L., Ohm, P. B.,
Dutcher, C. S., and Reid, J. P.: Influence of particle viscosity on mass
transfer and heterogeneous ozonolysis kinetics in aqueous-sucrose-maleic
acid aerosol, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20, 15560–15573,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01666f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c8cp01666f</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McNeill, V. F., Wolfe, G. M., and Thornton, J. A.: The Oxidation of oleate in
submicron aqueous salt aerosols: evidence of a surface process, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 111, 1073–1083, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp066233f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp066233f</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McNeill, V. F., Yatavelli, R. L. N., Thornton, J. A., Stipe, C. B., and Landgrebe, O.: Heterogeneous OH oxidation of palmitic acid in single component and internally mixed aerosol particles: vaporization and the role of particle phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5465–5476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5465-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5465-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Monod A. and Doussin, J. F.: Structure-activity relationship for the
estimation of OH-oxidation rate constants of aliphatic organic compounds in
the aqueous phase: alkanes, alcohols, organic acids and bases, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 7611–7622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.005</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mungall, E. L., Wong, J. P. S., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous
Oxidation of Particulate Methanesulfonic Acid by the Hydroxyl Radical:
Kinetics and Atmospheric Implications, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 48–55,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peeters, J., Vereecken, L., and Fantechi, G.: The detailed mechanism of the
OH-initiated atmospheric oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pinene: a theoretical study,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 3, 5489–5504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b106555f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b106555f</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Chan, A. W. H., Barkley, M. P., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global modeling of organic aerosol: the importance of reactive nitrogen (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11261–11276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Qiu, Y. and Molinero, V.: Morphology of liquid-liquid phase separated
aerosols, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 137, 10642–10651, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b05579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.5b05579</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rowley D. M., Lightfoot P. D., Lesclaux R., and Wallington T. J.:
Ultraviolet absorption spectrum and self-reaction of cyclopentylperoxy
radicals, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday T., 88, 1369–1376,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/ft9928801369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/ft9928801369</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Riva, M., Tomaz, S., Cui, T. Q., Lin, Y. H., Perraudin, E., Gold, A., Stone,
E. A., Villenave, E., and Surratt, J. D.: Evidence for an unrecognized
secondary anthropogenic source of organosulfates and sulfonates: gas-phase
oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of sulfate
aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 6654–6664,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00836" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b00836</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Russell, G. A.: Deuterium-isotope effects in the autoxidation of aralkyl hydrocarbons. mechanism of the interaction of peroxy radicals<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79, 3871–3877, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01571a068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja01571a068</ext-link>, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shakya, K. M. and Peltier, R. E.: Investigating missing sources of sulfur
at Fairbanks, Alaska, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 9332<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9338,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402020b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es402020b</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shakya, K. M. and Peltier, R. E.: Non-sulfate sulfur in fine aerosols
across the United States: insight for organosulfate prevalence, Atmos.
Environ., 100, 159–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.058</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Gas uptake and
chemical aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci., 108, 11003–11008, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1103045108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shiraiwa, M., Zuend, A., Bertram, A. K., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas–particle
partitioning of atmospheric aerosols: Interplay of physical state, non-ideal
mixing and morphology, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 11441–11453,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51595H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3CP51595H</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Multiphase OH oxidation kinetics of organic
aerosol: The role of particle phase state and relative humidity, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 5297–5306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl060582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014gl060582</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, J. D., Kroll, J. H., Cappa, C. D., Che, D. L., Liu, C. L., Ahmed, M., Leone, S. R., Worsnop, D. R., and Wilson, K. R.: The heterogeneous reaction of hydroxyl radicals with sub-micron squalane particles: a model system for understanding the oxidative aging of ambient aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3209–3222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3209-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3209-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stadtler, S., Kühn, T., Schröder, S., Taraborrelli, D., Schultz, M. G., and Kokkola, H.: Isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in the global aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0–HAM2.3–MOZ1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3235–3260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stone, E. A., Yang, L., Yu, L. E., and Rupakheti, M.: Characterization of
Organosulfates in Atmospheric Aerosols at Four Asian Locations, Atmos.
Environ., 47, 323–329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.058</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R.,
Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Organosulfate formation in biogenic secondary organic
aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A., 112, 8345–8378,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp802310p</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tolocka, M. P. and Turpin, B.: Contribution of organosulfur compounds to
organic aerosol mass, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 7978–7983,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300651v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es300651v</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vogel, A. L., Schneider, J., Müller-Tautges, C., Klimach,
T., and Hoffmann, T.: Aerosol chemistry resolved by mass spectrometry:
insights into particle growth after ambient particle formation, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 50, 10814–10822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01673" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01673</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Ren, J., Huang, X. H. H., Tong, R., and Yu, J. Z.: Synthesis of
four monoterpene-derived organosulfates and their quantification in
atmospheric aerosol samples, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 6791–6801,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b01179</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Hu, M., Guo, S., Wang, Y., Zheng, J., Yang, Y., Zhu, W., Tang, R., Li, X., Liu, Y., Le Breton, M., Du, Z., Shang, D., Wu, Y., Wu, Z., Song, Y., Lou, S., Hallquist, M., and Yu, J.: The secondary formation of organosulfates under interactions between biogenic emissions and anthropogenic pollutants in summer in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10693–10713, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10693-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-10693-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Yu, J.-Z., Shao, J., Liu, P., Zhu, W., Cheng, Z., Li, Z., Yan, N., and Xiao, H.: Organosulfates in atmospheric aerosols in Shanghai, China: seasonal and interannual variability, origin, and formation mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2959–2980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2959-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-2959-2021</ext-link>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wilsey, S., Dowd, P., and Houk, K. N.: Effect of alkyl substituents and ring
size on alkoxy radical cleavage reactions, J. Organ. Chem., 64, 8801–8811,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jo990652+" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jo990652+</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, R., Ge, Y., Kwong, K. C., Poon, H. Y., Wilson, K. R., Yu, J. Z., and
Chan, M. N.: Inorganic sulfur species formed upon heterogeneous OH oxidation
of organosulfates: a case study of methyl sulfate, ACS Earth Space Chem., 4,
2041–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00209</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, R., Lam, H. K., Wilson, K. R., Davies, J. F., Song, M., Li, W., Tse, Y.-L. S., and Chan, M. N.: Effect of inorganic-to-organic mass ratio on the heterogeneous OH reaction rates of erythritol: implications for atmospheric chemical stability of 2-methyltetrols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3879–3893, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3879-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3879-2020</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yamazaki, Y., Naganuma, J., and Gotoh, H.: A Theoretical, dynamical
evaluation method of the steric hindrance in nitroxide radicals using
transition states of model reactions, Sci. Rep., 9, 20339,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56342-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-56342-w</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>You, Y., Smith, M. L., Song, M., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.:
Liquid–liquid phase separation in atmospherically relevant particles
consisting of organic species and inorganic salts, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.,
33, 43–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0144235x.2014.890786" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/0144235x.2014.890786</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Worton, D. R., Lewandowski, M., Ortega, J., Rubitschun, C. L.,
Park, J.-H., Kristensen, K., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L.,
Jaoui, M., Offenberg, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Gilman, J., Kuster, W. C.,
de Gouw, J., Park, C., Schade, G. W., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L., Kaser,
L., Jud, W., Hansel, A., Cappellin, L., Karl, T., Glasius, M., Guenther, A.,
Goldstein, A. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Gold, A., Kamens, R. M., and Surratt, J.
D.: Organosulfates as tracers for Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation
from 2-Methyl-3-Buten-2-ol (MBO) in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
46, 9437–9446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301648z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es301648z</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Chemical transformation of <i>α</i>-pinene-derived organosulfate via heterogeneous OH oxidation: implications for sources and environmental fates of atmospheric organosulfates</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bahl, A. and Bahl, B. S: Advanced Organic Chemistry, 1st edn., S. Chand Publication, New Delhi, India, ISBN 9788121935159, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bateman, A. P., Walser, M. L., Desyaterik, Y., Laskin, J., Laskin, A., and
Nizkorodov, S. A.: The effect of solvent on the analysis of secondary
organic aerosol using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 42, 7341–7346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es801226w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es801226w</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bennett, J. E. and Summers, R.: Product studies of the mutual termination reactions of sec-alkylperoxy radicals: evidence for non-cyclic termination, Can. J. Chem., 52, 1377–1379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/v74-209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/v74-209</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bentley, R. and Chasteen, T. G.: Environmental VOSCs – formation and
degradation of dimethyl sulfide, methanethiol and related materials,
Chemos., 55, 291–317, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.12.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.12.017</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bergh, v. d., Vanhees, V. I., de Boer, R., Compernolle, F., and Vinckier, C.:
Identification of the oxidation products of the reaction between <i>α</i>-pinene and hydroxyl radicals by gas and high-performance liquid
chromatography with mass spectrometric detection, J. Chrom. A., 896,
135–148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00680-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00680-4</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brüggemann, M., Xu, R., Tilgner, A., Kwong, K. C., Mutzel, A., Poon, H.
Y., Otto, T., Schaefer, T., Poulain, L., Chan, M. N., and Herrmann, H.:
Organosulfates in ambient aerosol: state of knowledge and future research
directions on formation, abundance, fate, and importance, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 54, 3767–3782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06751.s001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06751.s001</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bruice, P. Y.: Organic chemistry, 6th edn., Pearson Publication, Lebanon, Indiana, USA, ISBN 9780321663139, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Budisulistiorini, S. H., Li, X., Bairai, S. T., Renfro, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y. J., McKinney, K. A., Martin, S. T., McNeill, V. F., Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Neff, M. E., Stone, E. A., Mueller, S., Knote, C., Shaw, S. L., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., and Surratt, J. D.: Examining the effects of anthropogenic emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee ground site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8871–8888, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8871-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Capouet, M., Peeters, J., Nozi`ere, B., and Müller, J.-F.: Alpha-pinene oxidation by OH: simulations of laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2285–2311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2285-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2285-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Carrasquillo A. J., Daumit K. E., Kroll J. H.: Radical reactivity in the
condensed phase: intermolecular versus intramolecular reactions of alkoxy
radicals, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 6, 2388–2392,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00913" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00913</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, M. N., Zhang, H., Goldstein, A. H., and Wilson, K. R.: Role of water
and phase in the heterogeneous oxidation of solid and aqueous succinic acid
aerosol by hydroxyl radicals, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 28978–28992,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5012022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5012022</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Lambe, A. T., Xu, R., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Zhang, Z.,
Szalkowski, T., Cui, T., Vizuete, W., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Ault, A. P.,
Chan, M. N., and Surratt, J. D.: Heterogeneous hydroxyl radical oxidation of
isoprene-epoxydiol-derived methyltetrol sulfates: plausible formation
mechanisms of previously unexplained organosulfates in ambient fine
aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol. Letters, 7, 460–468,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00276.s001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00276.s001</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chim, M. M., Chow, C. Y., Davies, J. F., and Chan, M. N.: Effects of relative
humidity and particle phase water on the heterogeneous OH oxidation of
2-methylglutaric acid aqueous droplets, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 1666–1674,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11606" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11606</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Compernolle, S., Ceulemans, K., and Müller, J.-F.: EVAPORATION: a new vapour pressure estimation methodfor organic molecules including non-additivity and intramolecular interactions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9431–9450, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9431-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9431-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Craig, R. L., Peterson, P. K., Nandy, L., Lei, Z., Hossain, M. A., Camarena,
S., Dodson, R. A., Cook, R. D., Dutcher, C. S., and Ault, A. P.: Direct
determination of aerosol pH: size-resolved measurements of submicrometer and
supermicrometer aqueous particles, Anal. Chem., 90, 11232–11239,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00586" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00586</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Darer, A. I., Cole-Filipiak, N. C., O'Connor, A. E., and Elrod, M. J.:
Formation and stability of atmospherically relevant isoprene-derived
organosulfates and organonitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1895–1902,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103797z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es103797z</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dennis-Smither, B. J., Miles, R. E. H., and Reid, J. P.: Oxidative aging of
mixed oleic acid/sodium chlo-ride aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
D20204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018163" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018163</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Domingos, J. S. S., Regis, C. D., Santos, V. S., Andrade, B., and Rocha, O.: A
comprehensive and suitable method for determining major ions from
atmospheric particulate matter matrices, J. Chrom. A., 1266, 17–23,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.074</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Freedman, M. A.: Phase separation in organic aerosol, Chem. Soc. Rev., 46,
7694–7705,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00783J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00783J</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Freedman, M. A.: Liquid–liquid phase separation in supermicrometer and
submicrometer aerosol particles, Acc. Chem. Res., 53, 1102–1110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00093</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
George, I. J. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous oxidation of atmospheric
aerosol particles by gas-phase radicals, Nat. Chem., 2, 713–722,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.806" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.806</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gopalakrishnan, S., Jungwirth, P., Tobias, D. J., and Allen, H. C.: Air–Liquid
Interfaces of Aqueous Solutions Containing Ammonium and Sulfate:
Spectroscopic and Molecular Dynamics Studies, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109,
8861–8872, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, A. M. K., Hong, J., Raatikainen, T., Kristensen, K., Ylisirniö, A., Virtanen, A., Petäjä, T., Glasius, M., and Prisle, N. L.: Hygroscopic properties and cloud condensation nuclei activation of limonene-derived organosulfates and their mixtures with ammonium sulfate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 14071–14089, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-14071-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-14071-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Jayarathne, T., Baumann, K., Goldstein, A. H., de Gouw, J. A., Koss, A., Keutsch, F. N., Skog, K., and Stone, E. A.: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of atmospheric organosulfates in Centreville, Alabama, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1343–1359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1343-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1343-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hettiyadura, A. P. S., Al-Naiema, I. M., Hughes, D. D., Fang, T., and Stone, E. A.: Organosulfates in Atlanta, Georgia: anthropogenic influences on biogenic secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3191–3206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3191-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3191-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, K. S., Darer, A. I., and Elrod, M. J.: Thermodynamics and kinetics of the hydrolysis of atmospherically relevant organonitrates and organosulfates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8307–8320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8307-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8307-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, D. D., Li, Y. J., Lee, B. P., and Chan, C. K.: Analysis of organic
sulfur compounds in atmospheric aerosols at the HKUST supersite in Hong Kong
using HR-ToF-AMS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3672–3679,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es5056269" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es5056269</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R.-J., Cao, J., Chen, Y., Yang, L., Shen, J., You, Q., Wang, K., Lin, C., Xu, W., Gao, B., Li, Y., Chen, Q., Hoffmann, T., O'Dowd, C. D., Bilde, M., and Glasius, M.: Organosulfates in atmospheric aerosol: synthesis and quantitative analysis of PM<sub>2.5</sub> from Xi'an, northwestern China, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3447–3456, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3447-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3447-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, D. D. and Stone, E. A.: Organosulfates in the Midwestern United
States: Abundance, composition and stability, Environ. Chem., 16, 312–322,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN18260" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN18260</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hyttinen, N., Elm, J., Malila, J., Calderón, S. M., and Prisle, N. L.: Thermodynamic properties of isoprene- and monoterpene-derived organosulfates estimated with COSMOtherm, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5679–5696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5679-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5679-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Iinuma, Y., Böge, O., Miao, Y., Sierau, B., Gnauk, T., and Herrmann, H.:
Laboratory studies on secondary organic aerosol formation from terpenes,
Faraday Discuss., 130, 279–294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b502160j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b502160j</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Iinuma, Y., Müller, C., Berndt, T., Böge, O., Claeys, M., and Herrmann, H.: Evidence for the existence of
organosulfates from <i>β</i>-pinene ozonolysis in ambient secondary organic
aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6678–6683,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070938t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es070938t</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jungwirth P. and Tobias D. J.: Ions at the Air/Water Interface, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 106, 6361–6373, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp020242g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp020242g</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J., Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J., Swietlicki, E., Putaud, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Fuzzi, S., Horth, J., Moortgat, G. K., Winterhalter, R., Myhre, C. E. L., Tsigaridis, K., Vignati, E., Stephanou, E. G., and Wilson, J.: Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1053–1123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, E., Root, M. J., Toohey, D. W., and Brune, W. H.: Introducing the concept of Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5727–5744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5727-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Bookhold, J., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Glass transition
and phase state of organic compounds: Dependency on molecular properties and
implications for secondary organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 13, 19238–19255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP22617G" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP22617G</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kristensen, K. and Glasius, M.: Organosulfates and oxidation products from
biogenic hydrocarbons in fine aerosols from a forest in Northwest Europe
during spring, Atmos. Environ., 45, 4546–4556,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.063</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kroll, J., Lim, C., Kessler, S., and Wilson, K.: Heterogeneous oxidation of
atmospheric organic aerosol: kinetics of changes to the amount and oxidation
state of particle-phase organic carbon, J. Phys. Chem. A., 119,
10767–10783, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b06946" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b06946</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kwong, K. C., Chim, M. M., Davies, J. F., Wilson, K. R., and Chan, M. N.: Importance of sulfate radical anion formation and chemistry in heterogeneous OH oxidation of sodium methyl sulfate, the smallest organosulfate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2809–2820, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2809-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2809-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lam, H. K., Kwong, K. C., Poon, H. Y., Davies, J. F., Zhang, Z., Gold, A., Surratt, J. D., and Chan, M. N.: Heterogeneous OH oxidation of isoprene-epoxydiol-derived organosulfates: kinetics, chemistry and formation of inorganic sulfate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2433–2440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2433-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2433-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lam, H. K., Xu, R., Choczynski, J., Davies, J. F., Ham, D., Song, M., Zuend, A., Li, W., Tse, Y.-L. S., and Chan, M. N.: Effects of liquid–liquid phase separation and relative humidity on the heterogeneous OH oxidation of inorganic–organic aerosols: insights from methylglutaric acid and ammonium sulfate particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2053–2066, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2053-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2053-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Liggio, J. and Li, S.-M.: Organosulfate Formation during the uptake of
pinonaldehyde on acidic sulfate aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13808,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl026079</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, Y., Xu, X., Song, W., Geng, F., and Wang, L.: Seasonal and Diurnal
Variations of Particulate Organosulfates in Urban Shanghai, China, Atmos.
Environ., 85, 152–160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.017</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mao, J., Ren, X., Brune, W. H., Olson, J. R., Crawford, J. H., Fried, A., Huey, L. G., Cohen, R. C., Heikes, B., Singh, H. B., Blake, D. R., Sachse, G. W., Diskin, G. S., Hall, S. R., and Shetter, R. E.: Airborne measurement of OH reactivity during INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 163–173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-163-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-163-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, F. H., Miles, R. E. H., Song, Y.-C., Ohm, P. B., Power, R. M., Reid, J. P., and Dutcher, C. S.: Diffusion and reactivity in ultra-viscous aerosol and the correlation with particle viscosity, Chem. Sci., 7, 1298–1308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sc03223g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sc03223g</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, F. H., Berkemeier, T., Shiraiwa, M., Nandy, L., Ohm, P. B.,
Dutcher, C. S., and Reid, J. P.: Influence of particle viscosity on mass
transfer and heterogeneous ozonolysis kinetics in aqueous-sucrose-maleic
acid aerosol, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20, 15560–15573,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01666f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01666f</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
McNeill, V. F., Wolfe, G. M., and Thornton, J. A.: The Oxidation of oleate in
submicron aqueous salt aerosols: evidence of a surface process, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 111, 1073–1083, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp066233f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp066233f</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
McNeill, V. F., Yatavelli, R. L. N., Thornton, J. A., Stipe, C. B., and Landgrebe, O.: Heterogeneous OH oxidation of palmitic acid in single component and internally mixed aerosol particles: vaporization and the role of particle phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5465–5476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5465-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5465-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Monod A. and Doussin, J. F.: Structure-activity relationship for the
estimation of OH-oxidation rate constants of aliphatic organic compounds in
the aqueous phase: alkanes, alcohols, organic acids and bases, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 7611–7622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.005</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Mungall, E. L., Wong, J. P. S., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Heterogeneous
Oxidation of Particulate Methanesulfonic Acid by the Hydroxyl Radical:
Kinetics and Atmospheric Implications, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 48–55,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00114</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Peeters, J., Vereecken, L., and Fantechi, G.: The detailed mechanism of the
OH-initiated atmospheric oxidation of <i>α</i>-pinene: a theoretical study,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 3, 5489–5504, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/b106555f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/b106555f</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Pye, H. O. T., Chan, A. W. H., Barkley, M. P., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Global modeling of organic aerosol: the importance of reactive nitrogen (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and NO<sub>3</sub>), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11261–11276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11261-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Qiu, Y. and Molinero, V.: Morphology of liquid-liquid phase separated
aerosols, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 137, 10642–10651, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b05579" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b05579</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Rowley D. M., Lightfoot P. D., Lesclaux R., and Wallington T. J.:
Ultraviolet absorption spectrum and self-reaction of cyclopentylperoxy
radicals, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday T., 88, 1369–1376,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/ft9928801369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/ft9928801369</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Riva, M., Tomaz, S., Cui, T. Q., Lin, Y. H., Perraudin, E., Gold, A., Stone,
E. A., Villenave, E., and Surratt, J. D.: Evidence for an unrecognized
secondary anthropogenic source of organosulfates and sulfonates: gas-phase
oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of sulfate
aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 6654–6664,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00836" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00836</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, G. A.: Deuterium-isotope effects in the autoxidation of aralkyl hydrocarbons. mechanism of the interaction of peroxy radicals<sup>1</sup>, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79, 3871–3877, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01571a068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01571a068</a>, 1957.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Shakya, K. M. and Peltier, R. E.: Investigating missing sources of sulfur
at Fairbanks, Alaska, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 9332−9338,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es402020b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es402020b</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Shakya, K. M. and Peltier, R. E.: Non-sulfate sulfur in fine aerosols
across the United States: insight for organosulfate prevalence, Atmos.
Environ., 100, 159–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.058</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Ammann, M., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Gas uptake and
chemical aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci., 108, 11003–11008, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103045108</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Shiraiwa, M., Zuend, A., Bertram, A. K., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Gas–particle
partitioning of atmospheric aerosols: Interplay of physical state, non-ideal
mixing and morphology, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 11441–11453,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51595H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51595H</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Slade, J. H. and Knopf, D. A.: Multiphase OH oxidation kinetics of organic
aerosol: The role of particle phase state and relative humidity, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 5297–5306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl060582" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl060582</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, J. D., Kroll, J. H., Cappa, C. D., Che, D. L., Liu, C. L., Ahmed, M., Leone, S. R., Worsnop, D. R., and Wilson, K. R.: The heterogeneous reaction of hydroxyl radicals with sub-micron squalane particles: a model system for understanding the oxidative aging of ambient aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3209–3222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3209-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3209-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Stadtler, S., Kühn, T., Schröder, S., Taraborrelli, D., Schultz, M. G., and Kokkola, H.: Isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in the global aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0–HAM2.3–MOZ1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3235–3260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Stone, E. A., Yang, L., Yu, L. E., and Rupakheti, M.: Characterization of
Organosulfates in Atmospheric Aerosols at Four Asian Locations, Atmos.
Environ., 47, 323–329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.058</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R.,
Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H.,
Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Flagan, R. C., and
Seinfeld, J. H.: Organosulfate formation in biogenic secondary organic
aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A., 112, 8345–8378,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Tolocka, M. P. and Turpin, B.: Contribution of organosulfur compounds to
organic aerosol mass, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 7978–7983,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300651v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es300651v</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, A. L., Schneider, J., Müller-Tautges, C., Klimach,
T., and Hoffmann, T.: Aerosol chemistry resolved by mass spectrometry:
insights into particle growth after ambient particle formation, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 50, 10814–10822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01673" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01673</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Ren, J., Huang, X. H. H., Tong, R., and Yu, J. Z.: Synthesis of
four monoterpene-derived organosulfates and their quantification in
atmospheric aerosol samples, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 6791–6801,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01179" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01179</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Hu, M., Guo, S., Wang, Y., Zheng, J., Yang, Y., Zhu, W., Tang, R., Li, X., Liu, Y., Le Breton, M., Du, Z., Shang, D., Wu, Y., Wu, Z., Song, Y., Lou, S., Hallquist, M., and Yu, J.: The secondary formation of organosulfates under interactions between biogenic emissions and anthropogenic pollutants in summer in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10693–10713, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10693-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10693-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Yu, J.-Z., Shao, J., Liu, P., Zhu, W., Cheng, Z., Li, Z., Yan, N., and Xiao, H.: Organosulfates in atmospheric aerosols in Shanghai, China: seasonal and interannual variability, origin, and formation mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2959–2980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2959-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2959-2021</a>, 2021.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Wilsey, S., Dowd, P., and Houk, K. N.: Effect of alkyl substituents and ring
size on alkoxy radical cleavage reactions, J. Organ. Chem., 64, 8801–8811,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jo990652+" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jo990652+</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, R., Ge, Y., Kwong, K. C., Poon, H. Y., Wilson, K. R., Yu, J. Z., and
Chan, M. N.: Inorganic sulfur species formed upon heterogeneous OH oxidation
of organosulfates: a case study of methyl sulfate, ACS Earth Space Chem., 4,
2041–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00209</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, R., Lam, H. K., Wilson, K. R., Davies, J. F., Song, M., Li, W., Tse, Y.-L. S., and Chan, M. N.: Effect of inorganic-to-organic mass ratio on the heterogeneous OH reaction rates of erythritol: implications for atmospheric chemical stability of 2-methyltetrols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3879–3893, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3879-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3879-2020</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Yamazaki, Y., Naganuma, J., and Gotoh, H.: A Theoretical, dynamical
evaluation method of the steric hindrance in nitroxide radicals using
transition states of model reactions, Sci. Rep., 9, 20339,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56342-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56342-w</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
You, Y., Smith, M. L., Song, M., Martin, S. T., and Bertram, A. K.:
Liquid–liquid phase separation in atmospherically relevant particles
consisting of organic species and inorganic salts, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.,
33, 43–77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0144235x.2014.890786" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/0144235x.2014.890786</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, H., Worton, D. R., Lewandowski, M., Ortega, J., Rubitschun, C. L.,
Park, J.-H., Kristensen, K., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L.,
Jaoui, M., Offenberg, J. H., Kleindienst, T. E., Gilman, J., Kuster, W. C.,
de Gouw, J., Park, C., Schade, G. W., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L., Kaser,
L., Jud, W., Hansel, A., Cappellin, L., Karl, T., Glasius, M., Guenther, A.,
Goldstein, A. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Gold, A., Kamens, R. M., and Surratt, J.
D.: Organosulfates as tracers for Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation
from 2-Methyl-3-Buten-2-ol (MBO) in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
46, 9437–9446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301648z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es301648z</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
