<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-5365-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Global maps of aerosol single scattering albedo using combined CERES-MODIS retrieval</article-title><alt-title>Global maps of aerosol single scattering albedo</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Global maps of aerosol single scattering albedo}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Devi and S. K. Satheesh}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Devi</surname><given-names>Archana</given-names></name>
          <email>archana.shiva13@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Satheesh</surname><given-names>Sreedharan K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of
Science, Bengaluru, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science,
Bengaluru, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>DST Centre of Excellence in Climate Change, Indian Institute of
Science, Bengaluru, India</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Archana Devi (archana.shiva13@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>5365</fpage><lpage>5376</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Archana Devi</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e104">Single scattering albedo (SSA) is a leading contributor
to the uncertainty in aerosol radiative impact assessments. Therefore
accurate information on aerosol absorption is required on a global scale. In
this study, we have applied a multi-satellite algorithm to retrieve SSA (550
nm) using the concept of critical optical depth. Global maps of SSA were
generated following this approach using spatially and temporally collocated
data from Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) and Moderate
Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors on board Terra and Aqua
satellites. Limited comparisons against airborne observations over India and
surrounding oceans were generally in agreement within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Global
mean SSA estimated over land and ocean is 0.93 and 0.97, respectively.
Seasonal and spatial distribution of SSA over various regions are also
presented. Sensitivity analysis to various parameters indicate a mean
uncertainty around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.044</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and shows maximum sensitivity to changes in
surface albedo. The global maps of SSA, thus derived with improved accuracy,
provide important input to climate models for assessing the climatic impact
of aerosols on regional and global scales.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e136">Atmospheric aerosols play a significant role in the earth's radiation budget
(IPCC, 2013). The climatic impact of aerosols depends on their absorption
and scattering properties, quantified by single scattering albedo (SSA).
Even a slight reduction in SSA can change the aerosol radiative forcing from
cooling to warming, depending on the underlying surface albedo (Kaufman et al., 2001; Chand et al.,
2009). However, the lack of an accurate global aerosol absorption database
has led to SSA being the largest contributor to the total uncertainty in
aerosol radiative impact assessment (IPCC, 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e139">The high spatiotemporal variability in aerosol properties entails the need
for observations on a global scale (Dubovik et al., 2002; Levy et al., 2007b;
Remer et al., 2008; Hammer et al., 2018). Satellite data, despite their
inherent limitation associated with an inverse problem, can provide the
global perspective required in analyzing spatiotemporal aerosol
characteristics (Torres et al., 2002). However, it is
difficult to quantify the absorption over bright surfaces (Kaufman and
Joseph, 1982; Ahn et al., 2014; Jethva et al., 2018). Hence, quantifying the
aerosol absorption over land regions using satellite-based remote sensing
remains a challenge even now (Torres et al., 2013; Jethva and Torres, 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e142">Fraser and Kaufman (1985) developed a critical surface reflectance method to
retrieve SSA using satellite data. Their method is based on radiative
transfer simulations, which showed a particular surface reflectance
where the top of atmosphere reflectance is independent of aerosol optical depth (AOD). Upward
reflectance between a clear and a hazy day over a varying surface
reflectance region are used, along with radiative transfer simulations, to
derive SSA. This method has been widely applied to data from various
satellites to derive SSA over particular regions (Kaufman, 1987; Kaufman et
al., 1990, 2001; Zhu et al., 2011; Wells et al., 2012). Seidel and Popp (2012) have done extensive studies on the method's sensitivity to various
parameters.</p>
      <p id="d1e145">Various studies have ascertained the inadequacy of single-sensor data in the
accurate retrieval of aerosol absorption (Kaufman et al., 2001; Zhu et al.,
2011). The dawn of the A-Train satellite constellation (Anderson et al., 2005) with
spatially and temporally near-collocated observations facilitates
multi-satellite retrieval of aerosol absorption   (Eswaran
et al., 2019; Hsu et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2007, 2009; Jeong and Hsu, 2008;
Narasimhan and Satheesh, 2013; Satheesh et al., 2009). However, all these
multi-sensor retrievals are in the ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths, and SSA is
extrapolated to visible wavelengths using spectral dependence of assumed
particle size distribution.  Satheesh and
Srinivasan (2005) defined the concept of critical optical depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and introduced a method to retrieve SSA in the visible region by
combining ground-based and satellite measurements. The method was
validated and demonstrated over many locations, including the desert location of
Solar Village in Saudi Arabia, using Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) data.</p>
      <p id="d1e162">In this paper, we have utilized the concept of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and further
extended the methodology to develop the combined CERES-MODIS retrieval
algorithm to derive regional and global maps of aerosol absorption (550 nm)
using multi-satellite data. The critical optical depth method developed
in this research shares a similar concept to the critical surface
reflectance method (Fraser and Kaufman, 1985). For a particular parameter
(such as surface reflectance or optical depth), there exists a critical
value at which the top of atmosphere albedo or reflectance
can be considered
independent of variations in that parameter. Both methods retrieve SSA
by parameterizing the critical value as a function of SSA using radiative
transfer simulations. The critical reflectance method requires data from 2 d
and large variations in surface reflectance over the region. It is suitable
for retrieving daily SSA for a particular region, whereas the critical
optical method developed in this paper is suitable for retrieving monthly or
seasonal global maps of SSA.</p>
      <p id="d1e176">The concept of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which forms the scientific basis for the
development of this retrieval algorithm is illustrated in Sect. 2. The
various steps involved in the retrieval algorithm are detailed in Sect. 3 on data and methodology. Sect. 4 presents the results and
comparison with other satellite datasets. Uncertainty analysis is studied
in Sect. 5. Comparison with aircraft measurements from various field
campaigns are shown in Sect. 6. Comparisons with AERONET data from 15 sites
are shown in Sect. 7. Summary and conclusions are provided in Sect. 8.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Critical optical depth</title>
      <p id="d1e198">Let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> be the difference between the top of the atmosphere
(TOA) albedo and the surface albedo. Then, for a particular location with a
given surface albedo, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations are only due to changes
in TOA albedo. The presence of absorbing aerosols over a bright surface
decreases the TOA albedo. In contrast, scattering aerosols over a dark
surface increase the TOA albedo. Thus, the increase (decrease) in aerosol
loading due to scattering (absorbing) types of aerosols leads to an increase
(decrease) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The rate of change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with aerosol loading is dependent on SSA.</p>
      <p id="d1e241">Satheesh and Srinivasan (2005) utilized this concept to retrieve SSA in the
case of absorbing aerosols over a bright surface. In a pristine atmosphere
(AOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) over a bright surface, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is positive for the solar zenith angle (SZA) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0. Here, when absorbing
aerosols become dominant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases with an increase in
AOD and eventually becomes negative. The AOD at which
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equals zero is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For a given
surface albedo, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the AOD at which the scattering and
absorbing effects of the aerosol cancel each other out. The rate of decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the increase in AOD is higher when SSA is high and
consequently lowers the resulting values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A radiative
transfer (RT) model was then used to calculate the SSA that reproduces the
same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, given atmospheric conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e345">RT simulations (black dots) shows deriving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red dot) for different cases of aerosols and surfaces. For pristine conditions (AOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0), diurnally-averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is negative for bright surfaces and positive for dark surfaces. An increase in aerosol loading by absorbing (scattering) type of aerosol leads to decrease (increase) in TOA albedo. <bold>(a)</bold> Absorbing aerosols above a dark surface, <bold>(b)</bold> absorbing aerosols above a bright surface, <bold>(c)</bold> scattering aerosols above a dark surface and <bold>(d)</bold> scattering aerosols above a bright surface.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e396">In this paper, the concept of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is extended to retrieve SSA for
all scenarios of surfaces (dark and bright) and aerosols (absorbing and
scattering). For AOD less than 1, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is almost linearly
dependent on AOD. Then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mathematically the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-intercept when parameterizing the linear relationship.</p>
      <p id="d1e438">Figure 1 shows the estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for four different scenarios.
Details of these RT simulations are given in Sect. 3.2. Unlike Satheesh
and Srinivasan (2005), where simulations were carried out for SZA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0,
here the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is diurnally averaged. Therefore, it is possible
to have negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for AOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 over relatively bright
surfaces. It is difficult to retrieve SSA where the slope of the regression line
is close to zero.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Data and methodology</title>
      <p id="d1e494">The combined CERES-MODIS retrieval algorithm consists mainly of two steps:
(1) determining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using MODIS and CERES data for a location, and
(2) estimation of SSA that reproduces the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
associated atmospheric conditions and surface albedo of that particular
location. Figure 2 shows the flowchart illustrating the combined CERES-MODIS
retrieval algorithm.</p>
      <p id="d1e519">The TOA and surface fluxes used to determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are obtained
from CERES SYN1deg-day, Edition 4.1 (Wielicki
et al., 1996; Rutan et al., 2015). To avoid angular dependence of fluxes,
the diurnally averaged flux data product from CERES is used, which is
available only at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution. Hence, other satellite datasets
in this study are also used at the same spatial resolution. The AOD and total
columnar water vapor are obtained from the MODIS Daily Global Product
(MxD08_D3 version 6.1). MODIS retrieves columnar AOD at 550
nm using two different types of algorithms – “Dark Target” (Levy
et al., 2007a, 2013) and “Deep Blue” (Hsu
et al., 2004, 2006; Sayer et al., 2013). Dark Target retrieves AOD over both
land and ocean, whereas Deep Blue retrieves AOD only over land. In this study,
we have used a combined Dark Target and Deep Blue product.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e543">Flowchart depicting the steps involved in combined CERES-MODIS retrieval of SSA for a particular location.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Determining the critical optical depth</title>
      <p id="d1e560">The first step for retrieval is to determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by linear
regression analysis between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. AOD as shown in Fig. 3.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-intercept of the resultant line of best fit (i.e., the AOD at which
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) provides the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. CERES and
MODIS daily data are at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  resolution, and SSA is
retrieved for each 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid. In
order to have adequate number of points for a meaningful regression
analysis, it was required to use data over a larger interval (temporal and
spatial), the extent of which is large enough to get a statistically significant
fit but small enough to ensure insignificant variations in SSA. Thus, to
determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a given pixel, 7 d of data from its
surrounding 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> region have been considered.
These data are further constrained based on surface albedo and water vapor.
Only those pixels in this region having a surface albedo within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.025 and water vapor within  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 cm of the given
pixel are considered for regression analysis. These constraints ensure that
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined from the best fit is dependent only on SSA and
not affected by changes in surface albedo and water vapor. Figure 3a shows
an example of regression with a positive correlation coefficient over the
Arabian Sea. This can happen over regions of low surface albedo and the
dominance of scattering aerosols. Figure 3b is an example of regression
analysis with a negative correlation coefficient obtained over the Sahara Desert in the
presence of dust aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d1e713">This procedure is repeated for all pixels, where data from the
surrounding 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> region are used to determine
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each pixel. For the regression analysis, points which are
outside one standard deviation are considered as outliers. A line of best fit
with a slope close to zero yields an extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value (very high
positive or very low negative). In such cases, we did not attempt a retrieval.
A significance test on the correlation coefficient between AOD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> albedo is performed with a 0.05 significance level. Only those <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values obtained through regression that are statistically
significant at the 95 % confidence level are utilized further to retrieve SSA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e784">Sample scatterplots between MODIS AOD and CERES <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The solid lines represent the best-fits for <bold>(a)</bold> absorbing aerosols above the Sahara and <bold>(b)</bold> scattering aerosols above the Arabian Sea. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (AOD at which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is zero) is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-intercept of the best-fit line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e839">The final product of this step is a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">360</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> matrix that stores
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value corresponding to each 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> pixel. In these
matrices not all points would have a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value due to the
insufficient number of points available for regression, either due to
cloud-masking or large variations in surface albedo over the land. At least
7 d of data are required to perform a statistically significant fit to
compute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and retrieve SSA. The next step in the procedure is to estimate SSA from these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values using an inverse lookup table (LUT) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Retrieval of SSA</title>
      <p id="d1e916">Since the objective of this study is to retrieve SSA globally,
LUTs were developed to reduce the computational time and
avoid repeated RT simulations. The aerosol models available in Optical
Properties of Aerosols and Clouds (OPAC), developed by Hess et al. (1998), are
given as input to the Santa Barbara DISORT (DIScreet Ordinate Radiative Transfer) Atmospheric Radiative
Transfer (SBDART) model (Ricchiazzi et al., 1998) to simulate TOA fluxes.
Specifications of the models used are shown in Tables S5, S6, S7 and S8 in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e919">The RT computations were carried out to obtain the diurnally averaged (SZA:
0–84<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) TOA and surface fluxes using 16 radiation
streams and spectrally integrated over the shortwave region (0.3–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m). For a particular case of surface albedo, water vapor, and SSA, AOD is
varied from 0 to 1 in steps of 0.2 to generate its corresponding diurnally
averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then a linear fit is performed between AOD and
simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to determine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For each aerosol
model a 3-dimensional LUT that stores <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for different
combinations of surface albedo, water vapor, and SSA have been developed.
The LUT is indexed by 11 values of surface albedo (0–0.5, increments of
0.05), 17 values of water vapor (0–8 cm, increments of 0.5 cm) and 10
values of SSA (0.8, 0.83, 0.85, 0.87, 0.9, 0.92, 0.95, 0.97, 0.99, and 1). A
total of 89 760 RT simulations were performed in the present study.</p>
      <p id="d1e982">The next step is to estimate SSA from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the LUT. For a
given surface albedo and water vapor of that pixel, we find the SSA
associated with its determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. An inverse lookup operation is
performed on LUT by linear interpolation between the nearest two indices.
The aerosol model (LUT) selected for retrieval is based on geographic
location (ocean or land, surface albedo) and aerosol loading. Details of
aerosol model selection are shown in Figs. S4 and S5. The SSA is estimated for each
available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of a pixel and then averaged to compute the seasonal mean SSA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1027">Figure 4 shows the seasonal-mean global maps of SSA (550 nm) retrieved by the
combined CERES-MODIS algorithm for the 5 years of 2014–2018. Data are
averaged for different seasons: December–January–February (DJF), March–April–May (MAM), June–July–August (JJA), and September–October–November (SON).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1032">Seasonal mean SSA maps for the period 2014–2018 retrieved by the combined CERES-MODIS, for <bold>(a)</bold> December–January–February (DJF), <bold>(b)</bold> March–April–May (MAM), <bold>(c)</bold> June–July–August (JJA), and <bold>(d)</bold> September–October–November (SON).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1053">The retrieved SSA dataset (550 nm) was compared with other widely used
global SSA datasets, OMI SSA (500 nm) and climatological POLDER SSA (565 nm). The OMAERUVd V3 (Torres et al., 2007, 2013; Ahn et al.,
2014) for the corresponding period are shown in panels a, c, e, and g in Fig. 5. The POLDER v1.2 Level 3 (Dubovik et al., 2011, 2014, 2021) climatological
seasonal mean SSA maps are shown in panels b, d, f, and h in Fig. 5. For a
generalized qualitative comparison, we can assume that SSA does not vary
much for the small 50 nm spectral difference between CERES-MODIS and OMI
SSA (Zhu et al., 2011; Jethva et al., 2014).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1059">Seasonal mean SSA maps of
OMI (500 nm) in panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold>, <bold>(e)</bold>, <bold>(g)</bold>
and POLDER (565 nm) in panels <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>, <bold>(f)</bold>, <bold>(h)</bold>, for
<bold>(a, b)</bold> December–January–February (DJF), <bold>(c, d)</bold> March–April–May (MAM), <bold>(e, f)</bold> June–July–August (JJA), <bold>(g, h)</bold> September–October–November (SON).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1106">From a quick comparison between Figs. 4 and 5 SSA maps, the following
points can be noted:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1111">Over the ocean, OMI retrieves SSA only for regions with high values of UVAI,
leading to large data gaps. In comparison, we can notice that CERES-MODIS
and POLDER have better data coverage on a global scale. In the CERES-MODIS
maps, the absence of data is mostly due to the unavailability of MODIS AOD.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1115">The Global Ocean, a relatively dark surface covering more than 70 % of the
earth's surface, plays a significant role in determining global aerosol
radiative forcing effects. Therefore, the better data coverage over oceans
by the CERES-MODIS and POLDER provides better input for radiative forcing
calculations.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1119">CERES-MODIS maps capture a wider range of SSA values. Regions with very low
SSA can easily be identified as the sources of absorbing aerosols. The OMI SSA
values are mostly above 0.9 and do not clearly capture the sources and
transport of absorbing aerosols.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1123">The OMI SSA values are more accurate in the UV wavelengths since SSA is
primarily retrieved in the UV regions and extrapolated to visible
wavelengths using aerosol models, whereas CERES-MODIS retrieves SSA directly
at 550 nm, hence is more accurate for SSA values in the visible wavelengths.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1127">Large variations in SSA can be observed between CERES-MODIS and POLDER,
especially over land where the aerosol loading is less. The POLDER SSA
retrievals are more accurate for higher aerosol loading. Chen et al. (2020)
has shown that POLDER SSA (670 nm) comparison with AERONET significantly
improves with the correlation coefficient increasing from 0.321 to 0.814 and
RMSE decreasing from 0.056 to 0.029 for AOD greater than 1.5.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1131">Over the land, POLDER shows very low SSA values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), thus
indicating the presence of highly absorbing aerosols even over less polluted
regions. The OMI values are around 0.9 over land and do not clearly identify the
presence of absorbing aerosols, whereas SSA values are within reasonable
range over land as retrieved by the CERES-MODIS method: high SSA values
over relatively pristine regions, lower SSA values over sources and
transport of absorbing aerosols.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1146">Seasonal trends in forest fires can be noticed in POLDER maps and distinctly
identifiable in CERES-MODIS SSA maps. Every year forest fires are common in
specific seasons in Canadian and Russian Boreal forests (JJA), the Amazon forest
(SON) and the South African forest (JJA and SON).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1150">The Indo-Gangetic plain (IGP) is a densely populated region spotted with
several coal-based thermal power plants and seasonal stubble burning. Low
SSA values are retrieved by both POLDER and CERES-MODIS over IGP, whereas
OMI shows values around 0.9 throughout the year. Similar patterns can be
observed over eastern China, one of the most highly polluted industrial
regions.</p></list-item></list>
From the above points, we can draw conclusions about the advantages of each
dataset. The OMI, CERES, and MODIS instruments are still operational, whereas
POLDER datasets are available only up to 2013. The OMI datasets are more suitable
for UV wavelengths, whereas the CERES-MODIS SSA dataset provides more
accurate SSA over visible wavelengths. The OMI provides operational daily global
SSA maps, whereas the CERES-MODIS algorithm is more suitable for obtaining
monthly/seasonal global SSA maps. Over the oceans, the POLDER dataset has
more coverage than OMI and identifies the transport of aerosols across the
oceans. Hence, POLDER SSA and CERES-MODIS SSA can be used for studying SSA
values over the ocean in the UV and visible wavelengths, respectively. Over
the land, OMI retrieves high SSA values, whereas POLDER shows very low SSA
values even over relatively pristine regions. Hence, the CERES-MODIS dataset
retrieves reasonable SSA values over both polluted and less polluted regions
for visible wavelengths.</p>
      <p id="d1e1154">Global mean SSAs retrieved by combined CERES-MODIS over land and ocean are
0.93 and 0.97, respectively (OMI: 0.94 and 0.94; POLDER: 0.88 and 0.94).
Accurate SSA estimations are also required over regions of interest such as
deserts, oceans, biomass-burning forests, and highly polluted industrial
areas. Hence, seasonal mean SSA values retrieved by the combined CERES-MODIS
algorithm, OMI, and POLDER are reported in Table S2 for major regions of
interest as shown in Fig. S1 and Table S1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Uncertainty analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1166">Table 1 identifies the major sources of error in the retrieval and
summarizes their individual contribution. Uncertainty in the retrieved SSA
was estimated by calculating retrieval sensitivities to perturbations in the
possible error sources. The range of perturbation was based on published
literature or reasonable assumptions for possible variations. Also, since
SSA is computed from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which depends on the slope of the regression,
uncertainties due to each error source were computed by perturbing them for
different cases of SSA (0.8–1 in steps of 0.01). For example,
uncertainties in surface albedo were calculated by perturbing it by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for different cases of surface albedo (dark–bright: 0.05–0.5 in
steps of 0.05) and SSA (absorbing to scattering: 0.8–1 in steps of 0.01).
The mean value of the uncertainties obtained from all these cases is shown
as retrieval uncertainty in Table 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e1190">Uncertainty in shortwave integrated surface albedo from CERES results in the
maximum uncertainty in SSA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. MODIS-retrieved AOD contains considerable uncertainties due to assumed aerosol models
(Jeong et al., 2005). The MODIS AOD uncertainty is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over land (Chu et al., 2002) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
ocean (Remer et al., 2002). The corresponding error in our retrieval is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For a typical variation of the Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the imaginary part of the refractive index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the
uncertainties vary depending on the surface albedo and are mostly around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1277">Changes in aerosol height can vary the TOA radiances due to Rayleigh
scattering interactions, which depend on pressure. Sensitivity to aerosol
height was estimated by conducting a synthetic retrieval of SSA over a range
of aerosol height values and perturbations from those heights. The average
uncertainty observed for an aerosol height variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Many methods have been developed for detecting aerosol type,
especially smoke vs. dust, to improve the uncertainties of various AOD and
SSA retrievals.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1304">Estimates of the uncertainty in retrieved SSA.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.93}[.93]?><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Retrieval</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Input uncertainty</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">uncertainty</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface albedo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AOD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (land)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ocean)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ångström exponent</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Refractive index</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol height</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Smoke vs. dust</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Residual of fit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1558">Uncertainties due to possible variations on scales of the regions used for
linear fitting were estimated as residuals of the fit. The uncertainty on
the linear intercept is spatially dependent and is mostly around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with higher values for those combinations having a slope close to zero
during the regression. For highly correlated cases (i.e., correlation
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the probability of
obtaining a slope close to zero is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % over the ocean and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % over land. These cases are mostly formed over regions where
AOD variations are less. Regions having large variations in AOD values have
lower uncertainty due to residual fit. Adding in quadrature, the total
uncertainty estimated for the CERES-MODIS algorithm is around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.044</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1614">Overall, the algorithm is most sensitive to variations in surface albedo,
followed by higher sensitivity towards AOD values used in the linear fit.
Seasonal mean maps of surface albedo are shown in Fig. S3. The uncertainties
are higher for scattering aerosols over bright surfaces and absorbing
aerosols above dark surfaces. Sensitivity to water vapor is almost
negligible, except in very few cases where the uncertainty is  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.008</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The CERES-MODIS algorithm is most effective over regions with
large AOD variations and less surface albedo variations.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Comparison with airborne observations</title>
      <p id="d1e1636">For the comparison of columnar SSA values thus retrieved, we have used
aircraft-based measurements of SSA from three campaigns: South West Asian
Aerosol Monsoon Interactions (SWAAMI), Regional Aerosol Warming Experiment
(RAWEX), and SWAAMI-RAWEX, to obtain column-integrated SSA. Available data
points over India and adjoining oceanic regions (Arabian Sea and Bay of
Bengal) from these field campaigns were compared with the retrieved SSA.</p>
      <p id="d1e1639">Babu et al. (2016), as part of RAWEX (Moorthy et al., 2016), derived SSA at
520 nm from aircraft measurements of scattering and absorption coefficients
over the IGP and Central India during winter 2012 and
spring/premonsoon 2013. Various measurements of aerosol properties were
carried out in an instrumented Beechcraft B200 aircraft of the National
Remote Sensing Centre, India. Manoj et al. (2019) estimated
vertical profiles of SSA during the SWAAMI campaign conducted during monsoon
(June-July) 2016 over the IGP, thee Arabian Sea, and the Bay of Bengal. Aerosol
scattering coefficients were measured aboard the Facility for Airborne
Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) BAe-146 aircraft. Vaishya et al. (2018) estimated
vertical profiles of SSA (520 nm) using an instrumented Beechcraft
B200 during the SWAAMI-RAWEX campaign (June 2016). Instrument design and
calibration were based on Anderson et al. (1996) and its application for
Indian field experiments was as described by Nair et al. (2009).
Uncertainties in the scattering coefficient measurement by a nephelometer are
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, as reported by Anderson et al. (1996). As
stated by Babu et al. (2016) uncertainties in the columnar SSA values
estimated from RAWEX aircraft measurements depend mainly on instrumental
uncertainties, sampling errors, and large spatial averaging.</p>
      <p id="d1e1654">Retrieved SSAs for the same period as the campaign over a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> region around the campaign location, were utilized for
comparison. Figure 4 shows the comparison of collocated aircraft
measurements and CERES-MODIS retrieved SSA. The ideal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> case (solid line),
the absolute difference of 0.03 (dotted lines), and regression coefficients
are also provided.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1692">Comparison of combined CERES-MODIS SSA with aircraft measurements during SWAAMI, RAWEX, and SWAAMI-RAWEX campaigns. The solid line shows the ideal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> case and dotted lines represent the absolute difference of 0.03.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1713">Most of the points were within the absolute difference of 0.03; however,
there were a few exceptions. The SSA values over the Bay of Bengal during SWAAMI
campaign were reported as 0.84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 during June–July by Manoj et al. (2019), whereas
CERES-MODIS retrieved a higher SSA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.89 for the same time
period. This large variation could be due to frequent cloud cover during the
monsoon season, leading to fewer SSA points retrieved over the ocean and
land. The SSA estimated over Nagpur in Central India during RAWEX was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8, while CERES-MODIS retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.85. This
inconsistency is due to the large surface albedo variations (standard
deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) over Central India, which leads to fewer points
available for retrieval. Except for a few such cases, most of the other points
lie within an absolute difference of 0.03.</p>
      <p id="d1e1751">For comparison purposes, many previous studies have used ground-level SSA
data from AERONET obtained through inversion methods (Zhu et al., 2011;
Jethva et al., 2014). Even in this study, only very few points were
available for comparison due to the limited number of direct measurements of
columnar SSA. Despite this limitation, this comparison exercise provided
confidence to generate global maps of SSA following this method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <label>7</label><title>Comparison with AERONET data</title>
      <p id="d1e1762">The Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) is a ground-based worldwide federated network of
Cimel Sun photometers that measure extinction AOD from direct Sun
measurements (Holben et al., 1998). The spectral diffuse sky radiations
measured at different angles are inverted in conjunction with direct Sun
measurements to derive the spectral SSAs (440, 675, 870, and 1020 nm) and
size distribution (Dubovik and King, 2000). The estimated uncertainty in
retrieved SSA is largely attributed to the uncertainties in instrument
calibration and is within 0.03 for AOD (440 nm) larger than 0.4. (Dubovik et
al., 2000, 2002).</p>
      <p id="d1e1765">The AERONET version 3, level 2.0 monthly average values from selected sites were
compared with corresponding CERES-MODIS SSA data. Sites were chosen to
represent various types of aerosols following that of Giles et al. (2012).
The location of the sites is shown in Fig. S2 and Table S3. Scatterplots of the comparison of AERONET SSA and CERES-MODIS SSA are shown in Fig. 7. AERONET
SSA at 550 nm was estimated by interpolation between the values at 440 and 675 nm.</p>
      <p id="d1e1768"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Most AERONET SSA values are above 0.85, even in the case of biomass burning
aerosols. For dust type aerosols (sites: Caboburning aerosols. For dust type Verde, Dakar, and Banizoumbaou) and mixed type aerosols (sites:
Sede Boker, Kanpur, Xiang He and Illorin) as shown in Fig. 7a and b respectively, the AERONET and CERES-MODIS data shows good agreement.
For urban (sites: Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Mexico City, Shirahama, Ispra, and
Moldova) and biomass (sites: Alta Floresta,
Lake Argyle, and Mongu), only very few data were available
during the study period of 2014–2018 as shown in Fig. 7 panels c and d. Data
points combined from all the sites are plotted together in Fig. 7e, showing a
RMSE of 0.026. Overall, the resulting comparisons are in agreement within the
uncertainties of both AERONET and CERES-MODIS datasets.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1775">CERES-MODIS SSA (550 nm) vs. AERONET SSA (550 nm) for various AERONET sites classified based on the type of aerosols (Giles et al., 2012), for <bold>(a)</bold> dust, <bold>(b)</bold> mixed, <bold>(c)</bold> urban, <bold>(d)</bold> biomass burning, and <bold>(e)</bold> combined results.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5365/2022/acp-22-5365-2022-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>8</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1809">Global maps of aerosol absorptions were generated using the newly developed
combined CERES-MODIS algorithm based on the concept of critical optical
depth. The CERES-MODIS dataset was compared with OMI and POLDER SSA
datasets. The retrieved SSA values were also compared with available
aircraft measurements over India and surrounding oceanic regions, which
showed that most retrieved SSA values are within  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We
showed that the combined CERES-MODIS algorithm captures the spatial
and seasonal variations in aerosol absorption better and the resultant maps provide
an improved global SSA database with fewer data gaps. Global mean SSA was
estimated to be 0.93 and 0.97 over land and ocean, respectively. Sensitivity
analysis to various parameters indicate a mean uncertainty around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.044</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and shows maximum sensitivity to changes in surface albedo. The
algorithm is shown to be the most effective over regions with large aerosol optical depth (AOD)
variations and less surface albedo variations. Comparison with SSA from 15
AERONET sites showed an acceptable agreement between AERONET and CERES-MODIS
SSA within their uncertainties. These global maps provide valuable input to
models for assessing the aerosol-climate impacts on both regional and global
scales.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1836">MODIS and CERES data used in this study are available at <uri>https://asdc.larc.nasa.gov/</uri> (last access: 2 December 2021, Wielicki et al., 1996; Rutan et al., 2015). POLDER GRASP datasets are available at
<uri>https://www.grasp-open.com/products/</uri> (last access: 2 December 2021, Dubovik et al., 2011). AERONET station data were
taken from <uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri> (last access: 2 December 2021, Holben et al., 1998). The combined
CERES-MODIS datasets are available upon request from the corresponding
author.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e1848">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5365-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5365-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1857">SKS conceptualized the method. AD developed the algorithm, carried out the
simulations, and analyzed the data. AD wrote the paper with revisions
from SKS.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1864">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e1870">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1877">The authors gratefully acknowledge the Atmospheric Science Data Center
(ASDC) at NASA's Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS)
Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs) for providing MODIS, OMI, and
CERES data products used in this study. The PARASOL/GRASP results are
generated by Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique and Cloudflight Austria
GmbH with the GRASP-OPEN software. We would like to thank the following
principal investigators and their staff for maintaining the following sites:
Phillipe Gouloub (Cabo Verde), Didier Tanré (Dakar and Banizoumbou),
Jean Louis Rajot (Banizoumbou), Arnon Karnieli (Sede Boker), Brent Holben
(Kanpur, GSFC, Mexico City, Shirahama, Moldova, Alta Floresta and Mongu
Inn), Shri N. Tripathi  (Kanpur), Pucai Wang and Xiangao Xia (XangHe), Rachel T.
Pinker (Ilorin), Itaru Sano (Shirahama), Giuseppe Zibordi (Ispra), Alexander
Aculinin (Moldova), Paulo Artaxo (Alta Floresta) and Ian Lau (Lake Argyle).
In addition, one of the authors (Sreedharan K. Satheesh) was supported by the J. C. Bose Fellowship from SERB Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi and the Tata Education and Development Trust.
We thank the Editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable
feedback and suggestions that have vastly improved the manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1882">This paper was edited by Jayanarayanan Kuttippurath and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ahn, C., Torres, O., and Jethva, H.: Assessment of OMI near-UV aerosol
optical depth over land, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2457–2473,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020188</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L., Charlson, R. J., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Chin, M.,
Christopher, S. A., Haywood, J., Kaufman, Y. J., Kinne, S., Ogren, J. A.,
Remer, L. A., Takemura, T., Tanré, D., Torres, O., Trepte, C. R.,
Wielicki, B. A., Winker, D. M., and Yu, H.: An “a-train”strategy for
quantifying direct climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 86, 1795–1809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-12-1795" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-86-12-1795</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Marshall, S. F., Laucks, M. L., Charlson, R.
J., Waggoner, A. P., Ogren, J. A., Caldow, R., Holm, R. L., Quant, F. R.,
Sem, G. J., Wiedensohler, A., Ahlquist, N. A., and Bates, T. S.: Performance
Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total
Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 13, 967–986,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Babu, S. S., Nair, V. S., Gogoi, M. M., and Moorthy, K. K.: Seasonal
variation of vertical distribution of aerosol single scattering albedo over
Indian sub-continent: RAWEX aircraft observations, Atmos. Environ., 125,
312–323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.041</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chand, D., Wood, R., Anderson, T. L., Satheesh, S. K., and Charlson, R. J.:
Satellite-derived direct radiative effect of aerosols dependent on cloud
cover, Nat. Geosci., 2, 181–184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo437</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, C., Dubovik, O., Fuertes, D., Litvinov, P., Lapyonok, T., Lopatin, A., Ducos, F., Derimian, Y., Herman, M., Tanré, D., Remer, L. A., Lyapustin, A., Sayer, A. M., Levy, R. C., Hsu, N. C., Descloitres, J., Li, L., Torres, B., Karol, Y., Herrera, M., Herreras, M., Aspetsberger, M., Wanzenboeck, M., Bindreiter, L., Marth, D., Hangler, A., and Federspiel, C.: Validation of GRASP algorithm product from POLDER/PARASOL data and assessment of multi-angular polarimetry potential for aerosol monitoring, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3573–3620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3573-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-12-3573-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chu, D. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Ichoku, C., Remer, L. A., Tanré, D., and
Holben, B. N.: Validation of MODIS aerosol optical depth retrieval over
land, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, MOD2-1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013205</ext-link>,
2002</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O. and King, M. D.: A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 20673–20696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900282" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900282</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Eck, T. F., and Slutsker, I.: Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 9791–9806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900040</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O., Holben, B., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King, M.
D., Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of Absorption and Optical
Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations, J.
Atmos. Sci. 59, 590–608,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0590:VOAAOP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0590:VOAAOP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O., Herman, M., Holdak, A., Lapyonok, T., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J. L., Ducos, F., Sinyuk, A., and Lopatin, A.: Statistically optimized inversion algorithm for enhanced retrieval of aerosol properties from spectral multi-angle polarimetric satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 975–1018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-975-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-975-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O., Lapyonok, T., Litvinov, P., Herman, M., Fuertes, D., Ducos, F., Lopatin, A., Chaikovsky, A., Torres, B., Derimian, Y., and Huang, X.: GRASP: a versatile algorithm
for characterizing the atmosphere, SPIE: Newsroom,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/2.1201408.005558" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/2.1201408.005558</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dubovik, O., Fuertes, D., Litvinov, P., Lopatin, A., Lapyonok, T., Doubovik,
I., Xu, F., Ducos, F., Chen, C., Torres, B., Derimian, Y., Li, L.,
Herreras-Giralda, M., Herrera, M., Karol, Y., Matar, C., Schuster, G. L.,
Espinosa, R., Puthukkudy, A., Li, Z., Fischer, J., Preusker, R., Cuesta, J.,
Kreuter, A., Cede, A., Aspetsberger, M., Marth, D., Bindreiter, L., Hangler,
A., Lanzinger, V., Holter, C., and Federspiel, C.: A Comprehensive
Description of Multi-Term LSM for Applying Multiple a Priori Constraints in
Problems of Atmospheric Remote Sensing: GRASP Algorithm, Concept, and
Applications, Front. Remote Sens., 0, 23,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FRSEN.2021.706851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/FRSEN.2021.706851</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eswaran, K., Satheesh, S. K., and Srinivasan, J.: Multi-satellite retrieval of single scattering albedo using the OMI–MODIS algorithm, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3307–3324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3307-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3307-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fraser, R. S. and Kaufman, Y. J.: “The Relative Importance of Aerosol
Scattering and Absorption in Remote Sensing”, in: IEEE Transactions on
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. GE-23, no. 5,  625–633, September 1985,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1985.289380" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.1985.289380</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Giles, D. M., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Sinyuk, A., Smirnov, A., Slutsker,
I., Dickerson, R. R., Thompson, A. M., and Schafer, J. S.: An analysis of
AERONET aerosol absorption properties and classifications representative of
aerosol source regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 17203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018127</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hammer, M. S., Martin, R. V., Li, C., Torres, O., Manning, M., and Boys, B. L.: Insight into global trends in aerosol composition from 2005 to 2015 inferred from the OMI Ultraviolet Aerosol Index, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8097–8112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8097-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-8097-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hess, M., Koepke, P., Schult, I., Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.: Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol Characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hsu, N. C., Herman, J. R., and Weaver, C.: Determination of radiative forcing
of Saharan dust using combined TOMS and ERBE data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 20649–20661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000jd900150</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S. C., King, M. D., and Herman, J. R.: Aerosol properties
over bright-reflecting source regions, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,
42, 557–569, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S. C., King, M. D., and Herman, J. R.: Deep Blue retrievals of Asian aerosol properties during ACE-Asia, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 3180–3195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.879540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2006.879540</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, R.-M., Martin, R. V., and Fairlie, T. D.: Global retrieval of columnar
aerosol single scattering albedo from space-based observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006832" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006832</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, R. M., Sokhi, R. S., and Fisher, B. E. A.: New algorithms and their
application for satellite remote sensing of surface PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol
absorption, J. Aerosol Sci., 40, 394–402,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.01.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.01.005</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: The physical science
basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in: Climate Change (2013), edited
by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge
University, Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jeong, M. J. and Hsu, N. C.: Retrievals of aerosol single-scattering albedo
and effective aerosol layer height for biomass-burning smoke: Synergy
derived from “A-Train”sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L24801,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL036279</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jeong, M. J., Li, Z., Chu, D. A., and Tsay, S. C.: Quality and compatibility
analyses of global aerosol products derived from the advanced very high
resolution radiometer and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004648" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004648</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jethva, H. and Torres, O.: A comparative evaluation of Aura-OMI and SKYNET near-UV single-scattering albedo products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6489–6503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6489-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-6489-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jethva, H., Torres, O., and Ahn, C.: Global assessment of OMI aerosol single-scattering albedo using ground-based AERONET inversion, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 9020–9040, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021672" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD021672</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jethva, H., Torres, O., and Ahn, C.: A 12-year long global record of optical depth of absorbing aerosols above the clouds derived from the OMI/OMACA algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5837–5864, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5837-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-5837-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaufman, Y. J.: Satellite sensing of aerosol absorption, J. Geophys. Res.,
92, 4307–4317, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD04p04307" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD092iD04p04307</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaufman, Y. J. and Joseph, J. H.: Determination of surface albedos and
aerosol extinction characteristics from satellite imagery, J. Geophys.
Res., 87, 1287–1299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC02p01287" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC087iC02p01287</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaufman, Y. J., Fraser, R. S., and Ferrare, R. A.: Satellite measurements of
large-scale air pollution: methods, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 9895–9909,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD07p09895" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD095iD07p09895</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Dubovik, O., Karnieli, A., and Remer, L. A.:
Absorption of sunlight by dust as inferred from satellite and ground-based
remote sensing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1479–1482,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012647" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL012647</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., and Boucher, O.: A satellite view of aerosols
in the climate system, Nature, 419, 215–223,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature01091</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., Mattoo, S., Vermote, E. F., and Kaufman, Y. J.:
Second-generation operational algorithm: Retrieval of aerosol properties
over land from inversion of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
spectral reflectance, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007811" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007811</ext-link>, 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., and Dubovik, O.: Global aerosol optical
properties and application to Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
aerosol retrieval over land, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 13210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007815" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007815</ext-link>, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levy, R. C., Mattoo, S., Munchak, L. A., Remer, L. A., Sayer, A. M., Patadia, F., and Hsu, N. C.: The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2989–3034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Manoj, M. R., Satheesh, S. K., Moorthy, K. K., and Coe, H.: Vertical profiles of submicron aerosol single scattering albedo over the Indian region immediately before monsoon onset and during its development: research from the SWAAMI field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4031–4046, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4031-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4031-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moorthy, K. K., Satheesh, S. K., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Evolution of aerosol
research in India and the RAWEX–GVAX: an overview, Curr. Sci., 111, 53–75,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/24910009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/24910009</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nair, V. S., Krishna Moorthy, K., Suresh Babu, S., and Satheesh, S. K.:
Optical and Physical Properties of Atmospheric Aerosols over the Bay of
Bengal during ICARB, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2640–2658,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3032.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JAS3032.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Narasimhan, D. and Satheesh, S. K.: Estimates of aerosol absorption over India using multi-satellite retrieval, Ann. Geophys., 31, 1773–1778, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1773-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-31-1773-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Remer, L. A., Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y. J., Ichoku, C., Mattoo, S., Levy,
R., Chu, D. A., Holben, B., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Martins, J. V., Li, R.
R., and Ahmad, Z.: Validation of MODIS aerosol retrieval over ocean,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, MOD3-1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013204</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Remer, L. A., Kleidman, R. G., Levy, R. C., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D.,
Mattoo, S., Martins, J. V., Ichoku, C., Koren, I., Yu, H., and Holben, B.
N.: Global aerosol climatology from the MODIS satellite sensors, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, 14–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009661" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009661</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ricchiazzi, P., Yang, S., Gautier, C., Sowle, D., Ricchiazzi, P., Yang, S., Gautier, C., and Sowle, D.: SBDART: A Research and Teaching Software Tool for Plane-Parallel Radiative Transfer in the Earth's Atmosphere, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2101:SARATS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2101:SARATS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rutan, D. A., Kato, S., Doelling, D. R., Rose, F. G., Nguyen, L. T.,
Caldwell, T. E., and Loeb, N. G.: CERES Synoptic Product: Methodology and
Validation of Surface Radiant Flux, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 32,
1121–1143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00165.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00165.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Satheesh, S. K. and Srinivasan, J.: A method to infer short wave absorption
due to aerosols using satellite remote sensing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32,
1–4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023064</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Satheesh, S. K., Torres, O., Remer, L. A., Babu, S. S., Vinoj, V., Eck, T.
F., Kleidman, R. G., and Holben, B. N.: Improved assessment of aerosol
absorption using OMI-MODIS joint retrieval, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114,
D05209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011024</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sayer, A. M., Hsu, N. C., Bettenhausen, C., and Jeong, M. J.: Validation and
uncertainty estimates for MODIS Collection 6 “deep Blue”aerosol data, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7864–7872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50600" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50600</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seidel, F. C. and Popp, C.: Critical surface albedo and its implications to aerosol remote sensing, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1653–1665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1653-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-1653-2012</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Torres, O., Bhartia, P. K., Herman, J. R., Sinyuk, A., Ginoux, P., and
Holben, B.: A long-term record of aerosol optical depth from TOMS
observations and comparison to AERONET measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 398–413, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0398:altroa&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0398:altroa&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Torres, O., Tanskanen, A., Veihelmann, B., Ahn, C., Braak, R., Bhartia, P.
K., Veefkind, P., and Levelt, P.: Aerosols and surface UV products from
Ozone Monitoring Instrument observations: An overview, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D24,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008809" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008809</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Torres, O., Ahn, C., and Chen, Z.: Improvements to the OMI near-UV aerosol algorithm using A-train CALIOP and AIRS observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3257–3270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3257-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3257-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vaishya, A., Babu, S. N. S., Jayachandran, V., Gogoi, M. M., Lakshmi, N. B., Moorthy, K. K., and Satheesh, S. K.: Large contrast in the vertical distribution of aerosol optical properties and radiative effects across the Indo-Gangetic Plain during the SWAAMI–RAWEX campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17669–17685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17669-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17669-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wells, K. C., Martins, J. V., Remer, L. A., Kreidenweis, S. M., and
Stephens, G. L.: Critical reflectance derived from MODIS: Application for
the retrieval of aerosol absorption over desert regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 3202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016891" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016891</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wielicki, B. A., Barkstrom, B. R., Harrison, E. F., Lee, R. B., Smith, G. L.,
and Cooper, J. E.: Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An
Earth Observing System Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77,
853–868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0853:CATERE&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0853:CATERE&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, L., Martins, J. V., and Remer, L. A.: Biomass burning aerosol absorption
measurements with MODIS using the critical reflectance method, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, D07202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015187" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015187</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Global maps of aerosol single scattering albedo using combined CERES-MODIS retrieval</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ahn, C., Torres, O., and Jethva, H.: Assessment of OMI near-UV aerosol
optical depth over land, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2457–2473,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020188</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L., Charlson, R. J., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Chin, M.,
Christopher, S. A., Haywood, J., Kaufman, Y. J., Kinne, S., Ogren, J. A.,
Remer, L. A., Takemura, T., Tanré, D., Torres, O., Trepte, C. R.,
Wielicki, B. A., Winker, D. M., and Yu, H.: An “a-train”strategy for
quantifying direct climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 86, 1795–1809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-12-1795" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-12-1795</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Marshall, S. F., Laucks, M. L., Charlson, R.
J., Waggoner, A. P., Ogren, J. A., Caldow, R., Holm, R. L., Quant, F. R.,
Sem, G. J., Wiedensohler, A., Ahlquist, N. A., and Bates, T. S.: Performance
Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total
Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 13, 967–986,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Babu, S. S., Nair, V. S., Gogoi, M. M., and Moorthy, K. K.: Seasonal
variation of vertical distribution of aerosol single scattering albedo over
Indian sub-continent: RAWEX aircraft observations, Atmos. Environ., 125,
312–323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.041</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chand, D., Wood, R., Anderson, T. L., Satheesh, S. K., and Charlson, R. J.:
Satellite-derived direct radiative effect of aerosols dependent on cloud
cover, Nat. Geosci., 2, 181–184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo437</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C., Dubovik, O., Fuertes, D., Litvinov, P., Lapyonok, T., Lopatin, A., Ducos, F., Derimian, Y., Herman, M., Tanré, D., Remer, L. A., Lyapustin, A., Sayer, A. M., Levy, R. C., Hsu, N. C., Descloitres, J., Li, L., Torres, B., Karol, Y., Herrera, M., Herreras, M., Aspetsberger, M., Wanzenboeck, M., Bindreiter, L., Marth, D., Hangler, A., and Federspiel, C.: Validation of GRASP algorithm product from POLDER/PARASOL data and assessment of multi-angular polarimetry potential for aerosol monitoring, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3573–3620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3573-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3573-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chu, D. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Ichoku, C., Remer, L. A., Tanré, D., and
Holben, B. N.: Validation of MODIS aerosol optical depth retrieval over
land, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, MOD2-1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013205</a>,
2002
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O. and King, M. D.: A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 20673–20696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900282" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900282</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Eck, T. F., and Slutsker, I.: Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 9791–9806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900040</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Holben, B., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King, M.
D., Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of Absorption and Optical
Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations, J.
Atmos. Sci. 59, 590–608,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0590:VOAAOP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0590:VOAAOP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Herman, M., Holdak, A., Lapyonok, T., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J. L., Ducos, F., Sinyuk, A., and Lopatin, A.: Statistically optimized inversion algorithm for enhanced retrieval of aerosol properties from spectral multi-angle polarimetric satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 975–1018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-975-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-975-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Lapyonok, T., Litvinov, P., Herman, M., Fuertes, D., Ducos, F., Lopatin, A., Chaikovsky, A., Torres, B., Derimian, Y., and Huang, X.: GRASP: a versatile algorithm
for characterizing the atmosphere, SPIE: Newsroom,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/2.1201408.005558" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/2.1201408.005558</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Fuertes, D., Litvinov, P., Lopatin, A., Lapyonok, T., Doubovik,
I., Xu, F., Ducos, F., Chen, C., Torres, B., Derimian, Y., Li, L.,
Herreras-Giralda, M., Herrera, M., Karol, Y., Matar, C., Schuster, G. L.,
Espinosa, R., Puthukkudy, A., Li, Z., Fischer, J., Preusker, R., Cuesta, J.,
Kreuter, A., Cede, A., Aspetsberger, M., Marth, D., Bindreiter, L., Hangler,
A., Lanzinger, V., Holter, C., and Federspiel, C.: A Comprehensive
Description of Multi-Term LSM for Applying Multiple a Priori Constraints in
Problems of Atmospheric Remote Sensing: GRASP Algorithm, Concept, and
Applications, Front. Remote Sens., 0, 23,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/FRSEN.2021.706851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/FRSEN.2021.706851</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Eswaran, K., Satheesh, S. K., and Srinivasan, J.: Multi-satellite retrieval of single scattering albedo using the OMI–MODIS algorithm, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3307–3324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3307-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3307-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Fraser, R. S. and Kaufman, Y. J.: “The Relative Importance of Aerosol
Scattering and Absorption in Remote Sensing”, in: IEEE Transactions on
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. GE-23, no. 5,  625–633, September 1985,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1985.289380" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1985.289380</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Giles, D. M., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Sinyuk, A., Smirnov, A., Slutsker,
I., Dickerson, R. R., Thompson, A. M., and Schafer, J. S.: An analysis of
AERONET aerosol absorption properties and classifications representative of
aerosol source regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 17203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018127</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hammer, M. S., Martin, R. V., Li, C., Torres, O., Manning, M., and Boys, B. L.: Insight into global trends in aerosol composition from 2005 to 2015 inferred from the OMI Ultraviolet Aerosol Index, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8097–8112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8097-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8097-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hess, M., Koepke, P., Schult, I., Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.: Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0831:OPOAAC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol Characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, N. C., Herman, J. R., and Weaver, C.: Determination of radiative forcing
of Saharan dust using combined TOMS and ERBE data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 20649–20661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900150</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S. C., King, M. D., and Herman, J. R.: Aerosol properties
over bright-reflecting source regions, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,
42, 557–569, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S. C., King, M. D., and Herman, J. R.: Deep Blue retrievals of Asian aerosol properties during ACE-Asia, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 3180–3195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.879540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.879540</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, R.-M., Martin, R. V., and Fairlie, T. D.: Global retrieval of columnar
aerosol single scattering albedo from space-based observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, D2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006832" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006832</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, R. M., Sokhi, R. S., and Fisher, B. E. A.: New algorithms and their
application for satellite remote sensing of surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> and aerosol
absorption, J. Aerosol Sci., 40, 394–402,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.01.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.01.005</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: The physical science
basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in: Climate Change (2013), edited
by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge
University, Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, M. J. and Hsu, N. C.: Retrievals of aerosol single-scattering albedo
and effective aerosol layer height for biomass-burning smoke: Synergy
derived from “A-Train”sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L24801,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036279" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036279</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, M. J., Li, Z., Chu, D. A., and Tsay, S. C.: Quality and compatibility
analyses of global aerosol products derived from the advanced very high
resolution radiometer and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004648" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004648</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Jethva, H. and Torres, O.: A comparative evaluation of Aura-OMI and SKYNET near-UV single-scattering albedo products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6489–6503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6489-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6489-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jethva, H., Torres, O., and Ahn, C.: Global assessment of OMI aerosol single-scattering albedo using ground-based AERONET inversion, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 9020–9040, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021672" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021672</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jethva, H., Torres, O., and Ahn, C.: A 12-year long global record of optical depth of absorbing aerosols above the clouds derived from the OMI/OMACA algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5837–5864, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5837-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5837-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufman, Y. J.: Satellite sensing of aerosol absorption, J. Geophys. Res.,
92, 4307–4317, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD04p04307" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD04p04307</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufman, Y. J. and Joseph, J. H.: Determination of surface albedos and
aerosol extinction characteristics from satellite imagery, J. Geophys.
Res., 87, 1287–1299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC02p01287" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC02p01287</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufman, Y. J., Fraser, R. S., and Ferrare, R. A.: Satellite measurements of
large-scale air pollution: methods, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 9895–9909,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD07p09895" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD07p09895</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Dubovik, O., Karnieli, A., and Remer, L. A.:
Absorption of sunlight by dust as inferred from satellite and ground-based
remote sensing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1479–1482,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012647" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012647</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., and Boucher, O.: A satellite view of aerosols
in the climate system, Nature, 419, 215–223,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01091</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., Mattoo, S., Vermote, E. F., and Kaufman, Y. J.:
Second-generation operational algorithm: Retrieval of aerosol properties
over land from inversion of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
spectral reflectance, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007811" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007811</a>, 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Levy, R. C., Remer, L. A., and Dubovik, O.: Global aerosol optical
properties and application to Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
aerosol retrieval over land, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 13210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007815" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007815</a>, 2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Levy, R. C., Mattoo, S., Munchak, L. A., Remer, L. A., Sayer, A. M., Patadia, F., and Hsu, N. C.: The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2989–3034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Manoj, M. R., Satheesh, S. K., Moorthy, K. K., and Coe, H.: Vertical profiles of submicron aerosol single scattering albedo over the Indian region immediately before monsoon onset and during its development: research from the SWAAMI field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4031–4046, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4031-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4031-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Moorthy, K. K., Satheesh, S. K., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Evolution of aerosol
research in India and the RAWEX–GVAX: an overview, Curr. Sci., 111, 53–75,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/24910009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/24910009</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Nair, V. S., Krishna Moorthy, K., Suresh Babu, S., and Satheesh, S. K.:
Optical and Physical Properties of Atmospheric Aerosols over the Bay of
Bengal during ICARB, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2640–2658,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3032.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3032.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Narasimhan, D. and Satheesh, S. K.: Estimates of aerosol absorption over India using multi-satellite retrieval, Ann. Geophys., 31, 1773–1778, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1773-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1773-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Remer, L. A., Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y. J., Ichoku, C., Mattoo, S., Levy,
R., Chu, D. A., Holben, B., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Martins, J. V., Li, R.
R., and Ahmad, Z.: Validation of MODIS aerosol retrieval over ocean,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, MOD3-1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013204" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013204</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Remer, L. A., Kleidman, R. G., Levy, R. C., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D.,
Mattoo, S., Martins, J. V., Ichoku, C., Koren, I., Yu, H., and Holben, B.
N.: Global aerosol climatology from the MODIS satellite sensors, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, 14–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009661" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009661</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Ricchiazzi, P., Yang, S., Gautier, C., Sowle, D., Ricchiazzi, P., Yang, S., Gautier, C., and Sowle, D.: SBDART: A Research and Teaching Software Tool for Plane-Parallel Radiative Transfer in the Earth's Atmosphere, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2101:SARATS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2101:SARATS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Rutan, D. A., Kato, S., Doelling, D. R., Rose, F. G., Nguyen, L. T.,
Caldwell, T. E., and Loeb, N. G.: CERES Synoptic Product: Methodology and
Validation of Surface Radiant Flux, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 32,
1121–1143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00165.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00165.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Satheesh, S. K. and Srinivasan, J.: A method to infer short wave absorption
due to aerosols using satellite remote sensing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32,
1–4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023064</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Satheesh, S. K., Torres, O., Remer, L. A., Babu, S. S., Vinoj, V., Eck, T.
F., Kleidman, R. G., and Holben, B. N.: Improved assessment of aerosol
absorption using OMI-MODIS joint retrieval, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114,
D05209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011024</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Sayer, A. M., Hsu, N. C., Bettenhausen, C., and Jeong, M. J.: Validation and
uncertainty estimates for MODIS Collection 6 “deep Blue”aerosol data, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7864–7872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50600" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50600</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Seidel, F. C. and Popp, C.: Critical surface albedo and its implications to aerosol remote sensing, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1653–1665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1653-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1653-2012</a>, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Torres, O., Bhartia, P. K., Herman, J. R., Sinyuk, A., Ginoux, P., and
Holben, B.: A long-term record of aerosol optical depth from TOMS
observations and comparison to AERONET measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 398–413, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0398:altroa&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0398:altroa&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Torres, O., Tanskanen, A., Veihelmann, B., Ahn, C., Braak, R., Bhartia, P.
K., Veefkind, P., and Levelt, P.: Aerosols and surface UV products from
Ozone Monitoring Instrument observations: An overview, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008809" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008809</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Torres, O., Ahn, C., and Chen, Z.: Improvements to the OMI near-UV aerosol algorithm using A-train CALIOP and AIRS observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3257–3270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3257-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3257-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Vaishya, A., Babu, S. N. S., Jayachandran, V., Gogoi, M. M., Lakshmi, N. B., Moorthy, K. K., and Satheesh, S. K.: Large contrast in the vertical distribution of aerosol optical properties and radiative effects across the Indo-Gangetic Plain during the SWAAMI–RAWEX campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17669–17685, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17669-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17669-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Wells, K. C., Martins, J. V., Remer, L. A., Kreidenweis, S. M., and
Stephens, G. L.: Critical reflectance derived from MODIS: Application for
the retrieval of aerosol absorption over desert regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 3202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016891" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016891</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wielicki, B. A., Barkstrom, B. R., Harrison, E. F., Lee, R. B., Smith, G. L.,
and Cooper, J. E.: Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An
Earth Observing System Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77,
853–868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0853:CATERE&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0853:CATERE&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, L., Martins, J. V., and Remer, L. A.: Biomass burning aerosol absorption
measurements with MODIS using the critical reflectance method, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, D07202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015187" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015187</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
