<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Measurement report}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-22-465-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Measurement report: Particle-size-dependent fluorescence properties of water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) and their atmospheric implications for the aging of WSOCs</article-title><alt-title>Particle-size-dependent fluorescence properties of WSOCs</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Particle-size-dependent fluorescence properties of WSOCs}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~Qin~et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>Juanjuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>Jihua</given-names></name>
          <email>tanjh@ucas.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Xueming</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Yanrong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>Yuanyuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xiaobo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Shaoxuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Kang</given-names></name>
          <email>kxiao@ucas.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Xinming</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-0928</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jihua Tan (tanjh@ucas.ac.cn) and Kang Xiao (kxiao@ucas.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>465</fpage><lpage>479</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>4</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e170">Water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) play important roles in atmospheric particle formation, migration, and transformation
processes. Size-segregated atmospheric particles were collected in a rural area of Beijing. Three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy was used to
investigate the optical properties of WSOCs as a means of inferring information about their atmospheric sources. Sophisticated analysis on
fluorescence data was performed to characteristically estimate the connections among particles of different sizes. WSOC concentrations and the average
fluorescence intensity (AFI) showed a monomodal distribution in winter and a bimodal distribution in summer, with the dominant mode in the
0.26–0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> size range in both seasons. The excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectra of WSOCs varied with particle size, likely due to
changing sources and/or the chemical transformation of organics. Size distributions of the fluorescence regional integration (regions III and V) and
humification index (HIX) indicate that the humification degree or aromaticity of WSOCs was the highest in the particle size range of
0.26–0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Stokes shift (SS) and the harmonic mean of the excitation and emission wavelengths (WH) reflected that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated systems were high in the same particle size range. The parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) results showed that humic-like substances
were abundant in fine particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and peaked at 0.26–0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All evidence supported the fact that the humification
degree of WSOCs increased with particle size in the submicron mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and then decreased gradually with particle size, which
implied that the condensation of organics occurred in submicron particles, resulting in the highest degree of humification in the particle size range of
0.26–0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rather than in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range. Synthetically analyzing three-dimensional fluorescence data could efficiently reveal
the secondary transformation processes of WSOCs.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e281">The environmental, health, and climate effects of atmospheric aerosol particles have been reiterated for many years (Pósfai and Buseck, 2010;
Burnett et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2020; Fan et al., 2020). Water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) comprise 10 % to 80 % of organic compounds
in atmospheric aerosols (Qin et al., 2018; Almeida et al., 2020; Cai et al., 2020). WSOCs play significant roles in cloud formation, solar irradiation,
and atmospheric chemistry (Asa-Awuku et al., 2009; Duarte et al., 2019). However, only 10 % to 20 % of organic compounds have been
structurally identified, and the majority of WSOCs remain uncharacterized. Generally, a WSOC mixture contains both<?pagebreak page466?> aromatic nuclei and aliphatic chains
(Decesari et al., 2001; Dasari et al., 2019), with functional groups or heteroatoms like hydroxyl, carboxyl, aldehyde, ketone, amino, and other
nitrogen-containing groups (Duarte et al., 2007; Cai et al., 2020). Biomass burning and secondary transformation of organics are believed to be the
main sources of WSOCs (Park et al., 2017; Xiang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e284">Many sophisticated analytical techniques have been developed to unveil the chemical structure of WSOCs (Johnston and Kerecman, 2019). Nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) is a powerful tool used to obtain the structures of organics (Stark et al., 2013; Duarte et al., 2015, 2020; Chalbot et al., 2016).
The application of other existing technologies used for identifying organics' structure, including electrospray ionization with ultrahigh-resolution
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR-MS), proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), isotopic
ratio mass spectroscopy (IRMS), and accelerator mass spectroscopy (AMS), has also been increasing due to the growing requirement for further insight into
organics in particulate matter (Cai et al., 2020; Mayorga et al., 2021) and into source characterization for organic emissions from fossil combustion or
biogenic origin (Masalaite et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e287">The abovementioned instruments are generally expensive to operate. In contrast, optical instruments like ultraviolet and fluorescence
spectrophotometers are relatively low-cost and efficient. Moreover, data generated by the optical instruments can provide quantitative and qualitative
information simultaneously, which warrants their broad application on organics research, such as investigating WSOCs and dissolved organic matter (DOM)
in water (Hecobian et al., 2010; Qin et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2016). Three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy is an optical instrument that has been
used in analyzing atmospheric WSOCs (Duarte et al., 2004; Fu et al., 2014). Fluorescence analysis can identify chromophoric organics like aromatics,
proteins, and other organic matter containing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated systems (Xiao et al., 2018, 2020). The excitation–emission matrix (EEM) can be extracted
from fluorescence spectra (acquired on a fluorescence spectrometer) and visualized to show fluorescence regions and possible categories of WSOCs by the
spectral characteristics (Duarte et al., 2004; Santos et al., 2009) as well as to study the aging of WSOCs by examining the red or blue shift of fluorescence
peaks (Lee et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2015; Vione et al., 2019). Fluorescence indices, determined by the chemical structure of pollutants, are important
subsidiary approaches to statistically analyze the fluorescence properties of WSOCs (Andrade-Eiroa et al., 2013a; Qin et al., 2018; Yue et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e297">Earlier studies have investigated the size distributions of WSOCs (Deshmukh et al., 2016; Frka et al., 2018), and more recent studies have focused on the
optical properties of size-segregated WSOCs (Chen et al., 2019; Yue et al., 2019. Generally, the mass concentrations of WSOCs show bimodal distributions
with the dominant mass concentration in the accumulation mode (0.05–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Yu et al., 2004, 2016). Structural investigations on coal-burning- and biomass-burning-affected humic-like substances (HULIS; a significant fraction of WSOCs) in four size ranges found consistent organic species through all of the size
ranges; however, the absorption bands of aromatic groups were more intense compared with carboxylic groups in the sub-3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions (Park
et al., 2017; Voliotis et al., 2017). Jang et al. (2019) comprehensively analyzed the structures of size-segregated humic-like substances extracted
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 nm) in Songdo, South Korea, during periods of pre-heating, current heating, and post-heating, and found that the chemical structures of HULIS changed
with particle size. Liu et al. (2013) examined the light absorption properties of size-resolved brown carbon (BrC) and methanol extracts in Georgia,
and they found that chromophores were predominant in the accumulation mode, with an aerodynamic mean diameter of 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. More recently,
fluorescence properties of size-segregated ambient WSOCs and bioaerosols were estimated in a coal-burning city and at a mountain site (Chen et al., 2019;
Yue et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e342">To date, comprehensive analysis of the fluorescence properties of size-resolved aerosols is still very limited, with an enormous amount of information being hidden in
the EEM spectra. The present study was designed to fill this knowledge gap by investigating the fluorescence properties of WSOCs with different particle
sizes. Six-stage size-segregated particle samples were collected in winter and summer in rural Beijing. The light-absorbing and fluorescence properties of
size-segregated WSOCs were obtained using the fast and efficient ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) and fluorescence methods. A number of fluorescence indices, Stokes shift, and
parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) were performed to quantitatively disclose the connections and transformations of WSOCs. The grey relational degree was
used to show the relations between particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sampling site</title>
      <p id="d1e360">Size-segregated particle samples were collected by a six-stage micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI) with respective aerodynamic cut-point diameters of
0.26, 0.44, 0.77, 1.4, 2.5, and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sample collection started at 08:00 LT (UTC-8) and concluded at 07:00 LT the next day, leaving 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
operation. All samples were collected on quartz filters (Whatman), which were prebaked for 5 h (500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) before sample collection, and
were wrapped in aluminum foil and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e414">The sampling site and air-quality-index-weighted 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> backward trajectory of winter and summer sampling days, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/465/2022/acp-22-465-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e431">A total of 20 sets of six-stage size-segregated aerosol samples were collected at a rural site in Huairou District, Beijing, from 14 November to
30 December 2016 and from<?pagebreak page467?> 30 June to 8 September 2017. The sample collection days were randomly selected, and samples were later categorized according
to the degree of air pollution. Winter sampling days covered six levels of air quality from excellent to severe pollution, whereas summer sampling days
only covered good and moderate air quality. The air-quality-index-weighted 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> backward trajectories during the sampling period are exhibited
in Fig. 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Chemical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e450">Organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC, respectively) were determined using a thermal–optical carbon analyzer (DRI), and the IMPROVE
(Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments) thermal evolution protocol was adapted. Detailed information can be found in earlier studies (Cheng et al., 2009; Tan
et al., 2016). The detection limit of OC and EC was 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as quantified by a filter and filter blank. Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) were performed by
replicate analyses every 10 samples, and the repeatability was better than 5 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e472">A quarter of the filter sample was ultrasonically extracted twice with 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ultrapure water each time and mixed up after extraction. The
extracts were then filtered through a 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> membrane filter to remove impurities (Xiang et al., 2017). The measurement of WSOCs was
performed by a TOC (total organic carbon) analyzer (multi N/C 3100, Analytic Jena AG, Germany).</p>
      <p id="d1e493">The extraction procedures for water-soluble ions (WSINs) were similar to those for WSOCs, but a 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Teflon filter was used to remove
impurities. Ion chromatography (IC, Dionex ICS 900 and 1100) was used in the detection, with eight WSIN species analyzed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The recovery
(90 %–110 %) and reproducibility (relative standard deviation of each ion lower than 5 %) of the ions were implemented as well.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e614">Size-segregated average WSOC and WSIN concentrations as well as their standard deviations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26–0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.44–0.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.77–1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.4–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.76</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WSOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2574">The excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectra of size-segregated samples in winter and summer; their excitation and emission wavelength ranges were the same and are only shown in the first EEM (left panel) in <bold>(d)</bold>. All spectra were partitioned into five regions and were assigned as protein-like pollutants (I and II), fulvic acid (III), soluble microbial byproduct-like substances (IV), and humic-like acid (V), respectively (Birdwell and Engel, 2010). Peaks A, B, C, M, and T were generally considered as humic-like fluorophores, tyrosine-like fluorophores, humic-like carbon with larger molecular weight, marine humic-like fluorophore, and tryptophan-like fluorophores (Coble, 1996). Rows <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> show the size-segregated EEM spectra of the winter and summer samples, respectively (unit: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and rows <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show the corresponding EEM spectra of fluorescence emitted per unit of WSOC carbon (unit: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RU</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/465/2022/acp-22-465-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Spectrophotometer analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2635">The extraction procedures for samples subject to fluorescence and ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) sampling were the same as for WSOC detection. The
excitation–emission spectra were obtained using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (F-7000, Hitachi, Japan), and UV–Vis spectra were obtained using an ultraviolet
spectrophotometer (UV-2401PC, Shimadzu, Japan). Briefly, the wavelength ranges were 200–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for excitation and 250–500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
emission with a 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interval for fluorescence spectroscopy (Qin et al., 2018). UV–Vis was measured between 200 and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interval. All EEM data in the present study are in Raman units (RU). The background signals, interfering signals (first- and second-order Rayleigh and Raman scatterings), and the inner-filter effects were removed by subtracting a blank EEM spectrum, replacing Rayleigh scatters with a band of missing values, and inserting a triangular set of zeros in the “emission far below excitation” area (Bahram et al., 2006). Data correction and standardization followed the procedures
described in Xiao et al. (2016). As shown in Fig. 2, the EEM spectra were partitioned into five regions (Birdwell and Engel, 2010), and the fluorescence
regional integration (FRI) method was applied to examine the fluorescence intensities of the accordant regions with respect to the total fluorescence
intensity. The specific fluorescence intensity (SFI) was the fluorescence intensity divided by the WSOC concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Data analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>2.4.1</label><title>Fluorescence indices</title>
      <?pagebreak page468?><p id="d1e2693">Fluorescence indices based on intensity ratios may provide clues about the condensation state of WSOCs. The humification index (HIX) was used to reflect
the degree of humification (Kalbitz et al., 2000; Coble, 2014):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M208" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>HIX</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EEM</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Ex</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">254</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Em</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>435–480</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>EEM</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Ex</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">254</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Em</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>300–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">345</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2746">Fluorescence is the light emission of a substance that has absorbed light or other electromagnetic radiation. The energy loss from fluorophore
relaxation is expressed as the Stokes shift (SS), which was described in Xiao et al. (2019). In brief, the SS is calculated according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) below,
where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ex</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the excitation wavelength and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Em</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the emission wavelength. The harmonic mean of the Ex/Em wavelength
(WH) in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) could represent the average energy level of excited states. Thus, the SS and WH of each fluorescence intensity could be identified
in an EEM spectrum.

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M211" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ex</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Em</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>WH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ex</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Em</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>2.4.2</label><title>PARAFAC</title>
      <p id="d1e2868">The PARAFAC model can decompose complex EEM spectra into several main components using a statistical method. The excitation spectrum, emission spectrum, and
scores of each component are as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M212" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3007">where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the fluorescence intensity; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of components resolved by PARAFAC; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is proportional to the concentration of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th component; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the scaled estimation of the emission and excitation spectra; the subscript <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sample number; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the emission and excitation wavelength, respectively. Before performing PARAFAC, all EEM data were normalized to unit norm to reduce
concentration-related collinearity and avoid extremely different leverages (Wang et al., 2020). The Tucker congruence coefficient (TCC) was determined for
each excitation spectrum and emission spectrum, and a threshold of 0.95 was applied to confirm the spectral congruence. The model was determined by
half-split validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>2.4.3</label><title>Grey relational analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e3082">Grey relational analysis is part of the grey system theory proposed by Deng (1982), which can be used to describe the<?pagebreak page469?> relative changes among factors
in a system whose information is partly known (this system is defined as a grey system). Grey relational analysis is suitable for solving complicated
problems with interrelationships between multiple factors and variables (Morán et al., 2006). It has also been used for solving environmental
issues (Kuo et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2011; You et al., 2017). In the present study, atmospheric particles can be treated as a grey system, due to their high complexity and indeterminacy; thus, the
grey relational analysis can be employed. The grey relational degree (GRD) is the result of grey relational analysis, and the
detailed calculation of this parameter is outlined in the Supplement. Generally, a reference line and one or a series of comparison sequences are
selected to calculate the GRD; the results are evaluated on a scale from 0 to 1, with high values indicating a closer compactness degree of the reference line and
comparison line.</p>
      <p id="d1e3085">Here, two sets of GRD values were obtained from WSOC concentrations and previously calculated fluorescence indices for each season. Firstly, considering the
evolution of particle size as a changing system, larger particles might come from the accumulation and transformation of smaller particles, especially
for ultrafine particles. By setting the data from all particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (factors like WSOC concentrations, the average fluorescence intensity – AFI, or UV) as the reference
sequence and corresponding factors for particles larger than 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as comparison sequences for each season, their affinities were
analyzed. Secondly, because only a part of WSOCs is fluorescent, by setting the WSOC concentrations of all samples as a reference sequence and their AFI
(or UV) as a comparison sequence, the GRD between WSOCs and the AFI was calculated.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Chemical compounds of size-segregated particles</title>
      <p id="d1e3132">Table 1 shows the size-segregated mass concentrations of WSINs, WSOCs, and OC as well as their ratios generated from the data collected at a rural site in
Beijing during winter and summer. WSOCs showed a monomodal distribution<?pagebreak page470?> in winter and a bimodal distribution in summer, with a dominant mode between 0.26 and
0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both seasons and a small secondary mode in particles larger than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer, indicating that carbonaceous
species were mainly rich in fine particles (Huang et al., 2020). Contemporary reports by other researchers have observed a bimodal distribution in WSOCs, with peaks located at 0.8 and 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, in Shenzhen, China, and at 0.4–0.5 and 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, in Gwangju, Korea (Yu et al.,
2016; Huang et al., 2020).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3177">Size distributions of WSOCs and the AFI in winter and summer. The AFI is in Raman units.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/465/2022/acp-22-465-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3186">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were 0.24–0.56 in winter and 0.16–0.31 in summer. These values were smaller than those previously reported for a polluted period
in Beijing and in other cities in China (Tian et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2020). Earlier studies have suggested higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios in summer than in
winter (Xiang et al., 2017; Qin et al., 2018), which is in contrast with the results of the present study. Contrasting seasonal patterns in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios have also been reported between urban and rural sites in Georgia, USA (Zhang et al., 2012), which seems to support our results presented above. In this work, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were higher in particles with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with the coarse mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mtext>2.5–10</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which is accordant with findings previously reported for clear days in Beijing (Tian et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Excitation–emission spectra of size-segregated WSOCs</title>
      <p id="d1e3267">The size-segregated EEM spectra of winter and summer WSOCs are depicted in Fig. 2a and b, respectively, and their specific fluorescence intensities (SFIs) per unit
WSOC are shown in Fig. 2c and d, respectively. The overall fluorescence peaks were mainly produced
among regions II–V, and the peaks were peak A, peak T, and peak M, which could be categorized as humic-like, tyrosine-like, and oxygenated organic
substances, respectively (Qin et al., 2018). The fluorophores first increased with increasing particle size, reached their highest intensities at
particle sizes of 0.26–0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and then decreased with increasing particle size in both seasons. Although the fluorescence peaks of WSOCs
were mainly produced in similar regions between the two seasons, the relative abundance was different (more quantitative analysis below). The
aggregated fluorescence spectra of all size-segregated samples resembled the spectra of total suspended particles (TSP) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, shown in Fig. S1 in the
Supplement, with some subtle nuance in border shape (Chen et al., 2016a; Qin et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e3291">The detailed characteristics of the fluorescence spectra could be found in the SFI spectra. The SFI showed evident differences between fine- and coarse-mode
particles in both seasons. The spectra of coarse-mode WSOCs covered a wide range of natural sources (according to our unpublished research), whereas the
spectra of fine particles widely overlapped with that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. S2 in the Supplement (matched with anthropogenic sources and
secondary sources from our study), indicating that the sources of WSOCs affected their fluorescence properties. Moreover, the SFI spectra showed a clear blue
shift within regions I to III with increasing particle size in winter as well as humble variations in summer.</p>
      <p id="d1e3305">Figure 3 shows the size distribution of WSOCs and their average fluorescence intensity (AFI) in the two seasons. The AFI showed a monomodal distribution with a
peak at a particle size of between 0.26 and 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter as well as a bimodal distribution in summer, which was accordant with the size distribution of
WSOCs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios could represent the overall average fluorescence density of WSOCs (Xiao et al., 2016). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios ranged
from 0.22 to 0.57 in winter and from 0.18 to 0.34 in summer. These values were higher than that in the industrial city of Lanzhou (Qin et al.,
2018). Our unpublished research found that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were lower than 0.2 for anthropogenic source samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3357">The size distribution of the fluorescence regional integration (FRI) for winter and summer. FRI1 to FRI5 are the FRI values of fluorescence regions I to V, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/465/2022/acp-22-465-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3366">The fluorescence regional integration (FRI) was calculated to quantify the relative strength of the fluorescence intensity in regions I to V, represented by
FRI1 to FRI5, respectively (Fig. 4). FRI I and FRI II (protein-like species) increased with increasing particle size and peaked at the coarse mode in winter. FRI III and
FRI V (HULIS) were mainly abundant in fine particles. FRI IV (microbial-related species) showed little variation in the particle size range from
0.26 to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but decreased with particle size from 2.5 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In summer, the sum of FRI I–FRI III increased with increasing
particle size, peaked at 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and decreased with particle size from 1.4 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. FRI IV showed the inverse: decreased with particle size in the range from 0.26 to 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and increased with particle size in the size range from
1.4 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. FRI V did not show a clear tendency, but these species displayed high abundance from 0.26 to 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.77 to
1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3452">The humidification index (HIX) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio served as indictors of the humification degree and the possibility of the biodegradation of WSOCs. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the HIX for different particle sizes, with a large HIX value indicating a high humification degree or high aromaticity for fluorescent organics. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios for different particle sizes, with a large value indicating more microbial metabolites in the fluorescent organics. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the size distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>WH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the winter and summer samples, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/465/2022/acp-22-465-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Fluorescence indices and properties associated with fluorescence mechanisms</title>
      <p id="d1e3531">Inclusive information was stored in fluorescence spectra, with some regularities being extracted by dividing fluorescence intensities
between wavelengths. The humification index (HIX) represents the humification degree or aromaticity of fluorescent organics. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
ratio between tryptophan and humics, can reflect the biodegradability of organics. Some other fluorescence indices are listed in Table S1 in the
Supplement.  Figure 5 shows the size distribution of the HIX and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio. The HIX showed a
monomodal distribution, peaking between 0.26 and 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer and between 0.44 and 0.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter, indicating that the aromaticity of
size-segregated WSOCs initially increased and then decreased with increasing particle size. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio increased gradually with
increasing particle size in winter, whereas it first decreased in fine particles and then increased with particle size in summer. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
peaked in the coarse mode in both seasons,<?pagebreak page471?> indicating that fluorescent microbial-related species likely existed on large atmospheric particles. It was
reported that biogenic oxygenated organics are more inclined to adhere to coarse-mode particles (Huang et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e3627">The Stokes shift (SS) is the energy loss due to fluorophore relaxation, which might be associated with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated system and electron cloud density
(Lakowicz, 2006). High SS values indicate greater energy loss due to relaxation in the excited states. Organic compounds with larger
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugation scales possibly exhibit a high fluorescence intensity in the high SS region (Xiao et al., 2020). Xiao et al. (2019) found that a
SS near 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an important border for hydrophobic and hydrophilic components. Hydrophobic fractions tend to have higher intensity
in SS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2, possibly as a result of the large scale of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated system. In contrast, hydrophilic fractions usually have ionogenic
groups bond with fluorescent aromatics, reducing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated systems and leading to high fluorescence intensities existing on both sides of a SS
of 1.2. Note that the same research also reported that hydrophobic fractions tended to present fluorescence peaks at SS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 (Xiao et al.,
2016). Thus, the ratios of fluorescence intensity for high SS (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1) values are calculated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M267" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Ex</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Em</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Ex</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Em</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3753">The harmonic mean of the excitation and emission wavelengths (WH) reflects the average energy level of the excited states. In a large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated
system, the electron in the ground state needs relatively low excitation energy to jump to the excited state (Berberan-Santos and Valeur, 2012).<?pagebreak page472?> The
ratios of the fluorescence intensity in the low-energy state (WH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 320) are calculated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M270" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>WH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Ex</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Em</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>WH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Ex</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Em</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3827">The size-segregated SS, average SS, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Figs S4 and S5 in the Supplement. The SS values of all particle sizes showed similar
distributions, in terms of the consistency of the fluorescence energy for WSOCs. The intensities for SS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 were of the same level as those for
SS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1, indicating the predominance of hydrophilic fluorescent contents in WSOCs. The average SS showed unobtrusive variations with increasing
particle size in both seasons, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was slightly higher for particle sizes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with other particle sizes in
winter. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>WH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tended to increase from a particle size of 0.26 to 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then decrease afterwards in both winter and
summer (Fig. 5c), indicating the existence of a large-scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated system or high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-electron density around 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and then
decreased with particle size from 0.44 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Fluorophores revealed by the classification of PARAFAC results</title>
      <p id="d1e3963">PARAFAC is a mathematical method capable of separating chemically independent but spectrally overlapping fluorescence components, based on the
assumption that EEM spectra are independent, linearly related, and additive (Murphy et al., 2011). Several prior studies have been carried out using the
PARAFAC method to investigate fluorescent WSOCs in atmospheric aerosols (Pohlker et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2019; Yue et al., 2019). The results have shown
that bioaerosols exhibited high bimodal signals at an excitation wavelength of 275 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at an emission wavelength of 320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is classified as
protein-like organic matter. In a typical coal-burning city in China, fluorophores emerging at excitation wavelength between 230 and 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an emission
wavelength between 380 and 410 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were associated with humic-like substances with a high molecular weight.</p>
      <p id="d1e3998">The present study conducted PARAFAC analysis for winter and summer samples separately to reveal seasonally dependent fluorescence spectra. Three
components (C) were extracted from winter spectra: C1, defined as HULIS-1; C2, representing a protein-like component; and C3, defined as HULIS-2
(Chen et al., 2016b). However, only two recognizable components were identified in summer: C1, characterized as HULIS-1, and C2, characterized as protein-like
components. Component C3 in the summer EEM spectra was of no physical significance (multiple emission peak points at one single excitation wavelength) and was
characterized as a noise signal.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4003">PARAFAC results of EEM in winter and summer, respectively. Three components were extracted for both seasons, and the proportions of each component for different particle sizes are also shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/465/2022/acp-22-465-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4013">The proportions of the extracted components are shown in Fig. 6 along with the PARAFAC results. Protein-like compounds were more abundant in
particles larger than 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both seasons (37 %–40 % in winter and 20 %–21 % in summer), and HULIS showed higher
fractions in fine-mode than coarse-mode particles in both seasons. This quantitatively demonstrated that microbial-related WSOCs more likely existed
in large particles and that HULIS was rich in fine particles. The ratios of HULIS-1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HULIS-2 in winter were higher in fine particles with an
aerodynamic diameter of 0.44–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than in ultrafine particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or coarse-mode particles. HULIS-2 was likely
freshly emitted fluorescent WSOCs, and HULIS-1 exhibited fluorescence characteristics of oxidized HULIS (Vione et al., 2019). The low
HULIS-1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HULIS-2 ratios in ultrafine and coarse-mode particles might be due to abundant sources of freshly emitted WSOCs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4070">The GRD of size-segregated WSOCs, AFI, and average UV: <bold>(a, b)</bold> the GRD calculated by the WSOCs, AFI, and average UV of each sample, setting data <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a reference, GRD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1; <bold>(c, d)</bold> the GRD between the WSOCs and the light absorption indices, setting WSOCs as a reference. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/465/2022/acp-22-465-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page473?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Specific relations among size-segregated WSOCs and fluorescence properties weighted by GRD</title>
      <p id="d1e4126">A high GRD represents a strong connection between the reference and comparison factors. By setting the WSOCs (or AFI and UV) of particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
as a reference and using those of larger particles for comparisons, the relations among particle sizes can be depicted by the GRD of size-segregated WSOCs (or AFI and
UV), as shown in Fig. 7a for winter samples and in Fig. 7b for summer samples. In winter, GRD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–GRD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a downward tendency, varying
from 0.88 to 0.76 for WSOCs and from 0.88 to 0.78 for the AFI, indicating that the WSOC concentration and the AFI gradually deviate from their original situation with
increasing particle size. In summer, GRD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–GRD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed little variation, with average values of 0.64 for WSOCs and 0.73 for the AFI, but
decreased in GRD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that WSOCs in particles larger than 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had little inheritance from the primal fine particle.</p>
      <?pagebreak page474?><p id="d1e4202">The relations of WSOCs with the AFI and average UV (referred to as UV below) of different particles are shown in Fig. 7c and d for winter and summer,
respectively. The AFI and UV showed a high GRD in both seasons for all particle sizes (with an average GRD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9), indicating that the fluorescence intensity
and light absorption were closely connected with the WSOC concentration. However, clear variations in the GRD were observed with increasing particle size, with
contrasting patterns to those of fluorescence indices. Thus, it was speculated that these variations resulted from the secondary transformation of
WSOCs, as indicated by the fluorescence indices. Moreover, the GRD was strongly negatively correlated with the estimated secondary organic carbon (SOC) concentration,
with a correlation efficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.64 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.000) in winter and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.63 in summer. The lowest GRD was found for particle sizes of
0.26–0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The high AFI, large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugation scale, rich HULIS, and low GRD in this particle size range indicated that the fluorescent
WSOCs of these particles were highly affected by secondary processes. Thus, the GRD between WSOCs and AFI could serve as an indicator of secondary formation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e4274">By characteristically analyzing the fluorescence properties of size-segregated WSOCs, we have gained a better understanding of the hidden relations
between fluorescence and the WSOC concentration, the possible evolution of fluorescence properties during particle size growth, and the source distinction
of fluorescent WSOCs between fine and coarse particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e4277">Accordant with earlier reports, the fluorescence intensities were positively correlated with WSOC concentrations in both winter and summer (Spearman's
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001) (Qin et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019). The size distributions of the AFI remained in step with those of the WSOC concentrations
and showed monomodal distributions in winter and bimodal distributions in summer, peaking at particle sizes between 0.26 and 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 2a, b). The EEM spectra of size-segregated WSOCs were mainly exhibited in regions II–V and underwent a blue shift with increasing particle size (0.44 to
10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e4329">The SFI spectra (fluorescence intensity per unit WSOC) showed different properties in different seasons or particle sizes. The size-segregated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were relatively high in fine particles with sizes between 0.26 and 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mainly affected by anthropogenic sources
and secondary process) and low in large particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but all ratios were higher than those of source samples. Freshly emitted WSOCs from the
source sample contained more unsaturated groups like aromatics and had lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio than aged WSOCs (Zhang et al., 2018; Cai et al.,
2020). Substitution and oxidation reactions of ambient organics might widen the delocalization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> electronics and reduce the excitation energy,
thereby resulting in a red shift of fluorescence spectra (Kalberer et al., 2004). The specific fluorescence area was widened in the ambient sample and, thus,
had a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio when WSOC concentrations were at a comparable level. The continuous oxidation of organics may break up the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> system
of organics and extinct fluorescence (Zanca et al., 2017). It could be inferred that ambient WSOCs tended to exhibit higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios,
whereas both freshly emitted WSOCs and completely oxidized WSOCs could lead to lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p>
      <p id="d1e4428">The fluorescence indices showed clear particle-size-dependent changes and vague seasonal variations. The same tendencies (i.e., increased first,
peaked in the particle size between 0.22 and 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and then decreased with particle size) were observed in the fluorescence indices of HIX and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>WH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated system of WSOCs increased and then decreased with particle size. Moreover, in the EEM
spectra, peak M was strong in particle sizes lower than 0.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and bleached in larger particles, and peak A underwent a blue shift with increasing
particle size. Contemporary research also found that aromatic secondary organic aerosol increased during the haze period (Yu et al., 2019). Furthermore,
it was noticed that the HIX and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed similar size distributions except for the larger peak particle size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
compared with the HIX. Because fine particles with relatively large sizes could exist for a long time in the atmospheric environment, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
increase gradually; however, the oxidation process could also cause fluorescence quenching and lead to a decrease in the HIX (Vione et al., 2019). Thus, the
HIX peaked at a smaller particle size compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4524">All of the evidence on fluorescence spectra and indices discussed above suggests that aging WSOCs might have experienced evolutionary processes during
particle size change. During the particle size increase process, fluorescence and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated system increased and peaked between 0.22 and
0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and peak M sparkled. Two possible mechanisms were proposed to explain this phenomenon. The first one was that the heterogeneous
polymerization of gas- and liquid-phase organics enlarged the delocalization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> electrons and led to the increase in fluorescence (Kalberer
et al., 2004). De Laurentiis et al. (2013) found that the triplet state of 1-nitronaphthalene directly reacted with phenol and formed biopolymer
transformation intermediates in the liquid phase and that the fluorescence spectra shifted to peak M during irradiation. The second mechanism was that oxygen heteroatomic rings formed or chromophoric groups like –<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and –OH added
to the fluorescent organics during the oxidation processes of organics in small particles; both of these processes could increase the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated system. Lee et al. (2014) observed that the fluorescence intensity of
secondary organic aerosol produced by the high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photooxidation of naphthalene (NAP SOA) increased when they were solar
irradiated. During the particle size decrease process, fluorescence decreased with increasing particle size and peak<?pagebreak page475?> M dribbled away. This might be
because further oxidation process gradually broke up the aromatic rings or unsaturated bonds in organic matter, and fluorescence quenched. Laboratory
results also confirmed that the fluorescence intensity of fluorescent organics eventually decreased following a long period of irradiation (De Laurentiis
et al., 2013, Lee et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e4581">PARAFAC results showed that HULIS was rich in fine particles and that protein-like compounds were rich in coarse particles in both seasons, which is
accordant with earlier reports (Chen et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020). In winter, the wavelength of HULIS-1 was slightly higher than that of
HULIS-2. The EEM spectra of HULIS-1 observed in the present study were similar to the PARAFAC results for highly oxygenated species, whereas those of
HULIS-2 were similar to the less-oxygenated species reported in Chen et al. (2016b) for chromophoric WSOCs. Only HULIS-1 was distinguished in summer in the present
study, which could be allocated to highly oxygenated species.</p>
      <p id="d1e4584">The particle-size-dependent variations in HULIS-1 reflected that the contents of the highly oxygenated species in WSOCs increased first, peaked between
0.26 and 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and then decreased with particle size, which cogently confirmed the size-dependent chemical composition of WSOCs. Such a
finding is consistent with the trend in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in size-resolved samples in Shenzhen in winter (Huang et al., 2020). The variations in
HULIS-1 further suggested that secondary processes were active during the particle formation process, which confirmed that the GRD value can be applied as
an indicator of the aging state of WSOCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions and implications</title>
      <p id="d1e4618">In this study, a six-stage micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI) sampler was adopted to collected size-segregated samples of aerosol particles in a rural site in Beijing. The WSOC
concentrations, UV absorption, fluorescence properties, and the energy information of fluorophores of different particle sizes were analyzed. The PARAFAC
method was used to decompose the mixture of fluorophores. The connections between WSOCs and the AFI of different particles were analyzed using the grey relational
degree (GRD). WSOCs and the AFI showed monomodal distributions in winter and bimodal distributions in summer. The fluorescence efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
was higher in winter than in summer and higher for particle sizes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than for larger particles. The variations in the fluorescence indices – the
HIX and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Peak</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio – and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>WH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicated that the aromaticity or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-conjugated systems of WSOCs increased in
ultrafine particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and decreased with increasing particle size. The PARAFAC results showed that HULIS was rich in fine-mode particles
and that protein-like sources were rich in large particles. The GRD results suggested that fluorescent WSOCs in particle sizes between 0.26 and
0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were highly affected by secondary sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e4719">The SFI spectra of coarse-mode WSOCs were relatively stable and could serve as a reference for identifying natural sources of WSOCs. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio in ambient WSOCs showed vast distinction from that of the source samples, and it could be used as a potential indicator of the oxidation degree of
secondary WSOCs. More research on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AFI</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WSOC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is recommended in order to generate representative values for different sources and transformation
processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e4746">The particle-size-dependent variations in the fluorescence characteristics suggest the potential for the application of the fluorescence method to investigate
the aging processes of WSOCs. Along with the fluorescence indices, extensive information could be gleaned from a fluorescence spectrum, including the
fluorescence intensities, the humification degree, the energy state, and the sources of WSOCs. If the connections between the fluorescence properties and the
chemical structure of organic matter are well understood, it might be possible to only use fluorescence data to understand the oxidation states of
organics. The seasonal and particle-size-dependent variations in the fluorescence of WSOCs suggested that the sources and the transformations of anthropogenic
sources were quite different in winter and summer and that secondary processes could induce fluorescence variations in WSOCs. Therefore, future research could work to establish the fluorescence characteristics of secondary WSOCs.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4753">The data used in this study are given in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4756">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-465-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-465-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4765">JT and KX designed the experiments, and JQ and YY carried them out. JQ collected all of the samples. JQ performed the data analysis and index calculations under the supervision of KX. YQ, XinW, and SS provided advice on data analysis and English revisions. XZ, XiaW, KX, and JT provided technical consultation on the article writing. JQ prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4771">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4777">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgement</title><p id="d1e4783">This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41675127 and 41475116). We also appreciate the valuable advice from the editor, who greatly improved the paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4788">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41675127 and 41475116).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4794">This paper was edited by Alex Huffman and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Almeida, A. S., Ferreira, R. M. P., Silva, A. M. S., Duarte, A. C., Neves, B. M., and Duarte, R.:
Structural features and pro-inflammatory effects of water-soluble organic matter in inhalable fine urban air particles,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
54, 1082–1091, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04596" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b04596</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 2?><mixed-citation>Andrade-Eiroa, Á., Canle, M., and Cerdá, V.:
Environmental applications of excitation-emission spectrofluorimetry: An in-depth review I,
Appl. Spectrosc. Rev.,
48, 1–49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2012.692104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/05704928.2012.692104</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 3?><mixed-citation>Asa-Awuku, A., Engelhart, G. J., Lee, B. H., Pandis, S. N., and Nenes, A.: Relating CCN activity, volatility, and droplet growth kinetics of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 795–812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-795-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-795-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 4?><mixed-citation>Bahram, M., Bro, R., Stedmon, C., and Afkhami, A.:
Handling of Rayleigh and Raman scatter for PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence data using interpolation,
J. Chemometr.,
20, 99–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cem.978</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 5?><mixed-citation>Berberan-Santos, M. N. and Valeur, B.:
Molecular fluorescence: Principles and Applications, second edn.,
Wiley-VCH, Germany, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527650002.index" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9783527650002.index</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 6?><mixed-citation>Birdwell, J. E. and Engel, A. S.:
Characterization of dissolved organic matter in cave and spring waters using UV-Vis absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopy,
Org. Geochem.,
41, 270–280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.002</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 7?><mixed-citation>Burnett, R., Chen, H., Szyszkowicz, M., Fann, N., Hubbell, B., Pope, C. A., Apte, J. S., Brauer, M., Cohen, A., Weichenthal, S., Coggins, J., Di, Q., Brunekreef, B., Frostad, J., Lim, S. S., Kan, H., Walker, K. D., Thurston, G. D., Hayes, R. B., Lim, C. C., Turner, M. C., Jerrett, M., Krewski, D., Gapstur, S. M., Diver, W. R., Ostro, B., Goldberg, D., Crouse, D. L., Martin, R. V., Peters, P., Pinault, L., Tjepkema, M., van Donkelaar, A., Villeneuve, P. J., Miller, A. B., Yin, P., Zhou, M., Wang, L., Janssen, N. A. H., Marra, M., Atkinson, R. W., Tsang, H., Quoc Thach, T., Cannon, J. B., Allen, R. T., Hart, J. E., Laden, F., Cesaroni, G., Forastiere, F., Weinmayr, G., Jaensch, A., Nagel, G., Concin, H., and Spadaro, J. V.:
Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
115, 9592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803222115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1803222115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 8?><mixed-citation>Cai, J., Zeng, X., Zhi, G., Gligorovski, S., Sheng, G., Yu, Z., Wang, X., and Peng, P.: Molecular composition and photochemical evolution of water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) extracted from field biomass burning aerosols using high-resolution mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6115–6128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6115-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-6115-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 9?><mixed-citation>Chalbot, M. G., Chitranshi, P., da Costa, G. G., Pollock, E., and Kavouras, I. G.:
Characterization of water-soluble organic matter in urban aerosol by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NMR spectroscopy,
Atmos. Environ.,
128, 235–245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.067</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 10?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Mu, Z., Song, W., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, L., and Zhang, Y. L.:
Size-resolved characterization of the chromophores in atmospheric particulate matter from a typical coal-burning city in China,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos,
124, 10546–10563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031149" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019jd031149</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 11?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q. C., Ikemori, F., and Mochida, M.:
Light absorption and excitation-emission fluorescence of urban organic aerosol components and their relationship to chemical structure,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
50, 10859–10868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b02541</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 12?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q. C., Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Coburn, S., Volkamer, R., Iwamoto, Y., Kagami, S., Deng, Y. G., Ogawa, S., Ramasamy, S., Kato, S., Ida, A., Kajii, Y., and Mochida, M.:
Characterization of chromophoric water-soluble organic matter in urban, forest, and marine aerosols by HR-ToF-MS analysis and excitation emission matrix spectroscopy,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
50, 10351–10360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b01643</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 13?><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., He, K. B., Duan, F. K., Zheng, M., Ma, Y. L., and Tan, J. H.:
Measurement of semivolatile carbonaceous aerosols and its implications: A review,
Environ. Int.,
35, 674–681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2008.11.007</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 14?><mixed-citation>Coble, P.:
Aquatic organic matter fluorescence,
Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045452" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781139045452</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 15?><mixed-citation>Coble, P. G.:
Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation emission matrix spectroscopy,
Mar. Chem.,
51, 325–346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 16?><mixed-citation>Dasari, S., Andersson, A., Bikkina, S., Holmstrand, H., Budhavant, K., Satheesh, S., Asmi, E., Kesti, J., Backman, J., Salam, A., Bisht, D. S., Tiwari, S., Hameed, Z., and Gustafsson, Ö.:
Photochemical degradation affects the light absorption of water-soluble brown carbon in the South Asian outflow,
Sci. Adv.,
10, eaau8066, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aau8066</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 17?><mixed-citation>De Laurentiis, E., Sur, B., Pazzi, M., Maurino, V., Minero, C., Mailhot, G., Brigante, M., and Vione, D.:
Phenol transformation and dimerisation, photosensitised by the triplet state of 1-nitronaphthalene: A possible pathway to humic-like substances (HULIS) in atmospheric waters,
Atmos. Environ.,
70, 318–327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.014</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 18?><mixed-citation>Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Matta, E., Lettini, F., Mircea, M., Fuzzi, S., Tagliavini, E., and Putaud, J. P.:
Chemical features and seasonal variation of fine aerosol water-soluble organic compounds in the Po Valley, Italy,
Atmos. Environ.,
35, 3691–3699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00509-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00509-4</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 19?><mixed-citation>Deng, J.-L.:
Control problems of grey systems,
Syst. Control Lett.,
1, 288–294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page477?><ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 20?><mixed-citation>Deshmukh, D. K., Kawamura, K., and Deb, M. K.:
Dicarboxylic acids, omega-oxocarboxylic acids, alpha-dicarbonyls, WSOC, OC, EC, and inorganic ions in wintertime size segregated aerosols from central India: Sources and formation processes,
Chemosphere,
161, 27–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.107</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 22?><mixed-citation>Duarte, R., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.:
Synchronous scan and excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy of water-soluble organic compounds in atmospheric aerosols,
J. Atmos. Chem.,
48, 157–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCH.0000036845.82039.8c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:JOCH.0000036845.82039.8c</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 23?><mixed-citation>Duarte, R., Santos, E. B. H., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.:
Comparison of structural features of water-soluble organic matter from atmospheric aerosols with those of aquatic humic substances,
Atmos. Environ.,
41, 8100–8113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.034</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 21?><mixed-citation>Duarte, R., Pineiro-Iglesias, M., Lopez-Mahia, P., Muniategui-Lorenzo, S., Moreda-Pineiro, J., Silva, A. M. S., and Duarte, A. C.:
Comparative study of atmospheric water-soluble organic aerosols composition in contrasting suburban environments in the Iberian Peninsula Coast,
Sci. Total Environ.,
648, 430–441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.171</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 25?><mixed-citation>Duarte, R. M. B. O., Freire, S. M. S. C., and Duarte, A. C.:
Investigating the water-soluble organic functionality of urban aerosols using two-dimensional correlation of solid-state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NMR and FTIR spectral data,
Atmos. Environ.,
116, 245–252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.043</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 24?><mixed-citation>Duarte, R. M. B. O., Duan, P., Mao, J., Chu, W., Duarte, A. C., and Schmidt-Rohr, K.:
Exploring water-soluble organic aerosols structures in urban atmosphere using advanced solid-state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NMR spectroscopy,
Atmos. Environ.,
230, 117503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117503</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 26?><mixed-citation>Fan, J., Rosenfeld, D., Zhang, Y., Giangrande, S. E., Li, Z., Machado, L. A. T., Martin, S. T., Yang, Y., Wang, J., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Braga, R. C., Comstock, J. M., Feng, Z., Gao, W., Gomes, H. B., Mei, F., Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., and de Souza, R. A. F.:
Substantial convection and precipitation enhancements by ultrafine aerosol particles,
Science,
359, 8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aan8461</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 27?><mixed-citation>Frka, S., Grgić, I., Turšič, J., Gini, M. I., and Eleftheriadis, K.:
Seasonal variability of carbon in humic-like matter of ambient size segregated water-soluble organic aerosols from urban background environment,
Atmos. Environ.,
173, 239–247, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.013</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 28?><mixed-citation>Fu, P., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., and Miyazaki, Y.:
Secondary production of organic aerosols from biogenic VOCs over Mt. Fuji, Japan,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
48, 8491–8497, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es500794d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es500794d</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 29?><mixed-citation>Fu, P., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., Qin, M., Ren, L., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Barrie, L. A., Tachibana, E., Ding, A., and Yamashita, Y.:
Fluorescent water-soluble organic aerosols in the High Arctic atmosphere,
Sci. Rep.-UK,
5, 9845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep09845</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 30?><mixed-citation>Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R. J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 31?><mixed-citation>Huang, X. F., Dai, J., Zhu, Q., Yu, K., and Du, K.:
Abundant biogenic oxygenated organic aerosol in atmospheric coarse particles: plausible sources and atmospheric implications,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
54, 1425–1430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b06311</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 32?><mixed-citation>Jang, K.-S., Choi, A. Y., Choi, M., Kang, H., Kim, T.-W., and Park, K.-T.:
Size segregated chemical compositions of HULISs in ambient aerosols collected during the winter season in Songdo, South Korea,
Atmosphere,
10, 226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040226" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos10040226</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 33?><mixed-citation>Johnston, M. V. and Kerecman, D. E.:
Molecular Characterization of Atmospheric Organic Aerosol by Mass Spectrometry,
Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem.,
12, 247–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-061516-045135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-anchem-061516-045135</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 34?><mixed-citation>Kalberer, M., Paulsen, D., Sax, M., Steinbacher, M., Dommen, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Fisseha, R., Weingartner, E., Frankevich, V., and Zenobi, R.:
Identification of polymers as major components of atmospheric organic aerosols,
Science,
303, 1659–1662, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1092185</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kalbitz, K., Geyer, S., and Geyer, W.:
A comparative characterization of dissolved organic matter by means of original aqueous samples and isolated humic substances, Chemosphere, 40, 1305–1312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00238-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00238-6</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 35?><mixed-citation>Kuo, Y., Yang, T., and Huang, G. W.:
The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems,
Comput. Ind. Eng.,
55, 80–93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 36?><mixed-citation>Lakowicz, J. R.:
Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy,
Springer US, Baltimore, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46312-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-0-387-46312-4</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 38?><mixed-citation>Lee, H. J., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Excitation-emission spectra and fluorescence quantum yields for fresh and aged biogenic secondary organic aerosols,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
47, 5763–5770, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400644c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es400644c</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 37?><mixed-citation>Lee, H. J., Aiona, P. K., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of solar radiation on the optical properties and molecular composition of laboratory proxies of atmospheric brown carbon,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
48, 10217–10226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502515r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es502515r</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 39?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 40?><mixed-citation>Masalaite, A., Holzinger, R., Ceburnis, D., Remeikis, V., Ulevicius, V., Rockmann, T., and Dusek, U.:
Sources and atmospheric processing of size segregated aerosol particles revealed by stable carbon isotope ratios and chemical speciation,
Environ. Pollut.,
240, 286–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.073</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 41?><mixed-citation>Mayorga, R. J., Zhao, Z., and Zhang, H.:
Formation of secondary organic aerosol from nitrate radical oxidation of phenolic VOCs: Implications for nitration mechanisms and brown carbon formation,
Atmos. Environ.,
244, 117910, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117910" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117910</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 42?><mixed-citation>Morán, J., Granada, E., Míguez, J. L., and Porteiro, J.:
Use of grey relational analysis to assess and optimi<?pagebreak page478?>ze small biomass boilers,
Fuel Process. Technol.,
87, 123–127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.08.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.08.008</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 43?><mixed-citation>Murphy, K. R., Hambly, A., Singh, S., Henderson, R. K., Baker, A., Stuetz, R., and Khan, S. J.:
Organic matter fluorescence in municipal water recycling schemes: toward a unified PARAFAC model,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 2909–2916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103015e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es103015e</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 44?><mixed-citation>Park S., Yu, J., Yu, G.-H., and Bae, M.-S.:
Chemical and absorption characteristics of water-soluble organic carbon and humic-like substances in size segregated particles from biomass burning emissions,
Asian J. Atmos. Environ.,
11, 96–106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2017.11.2.096" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5572/ajae.2017.11.2.096</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 45?><mixed-citation>Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J. A., and Pöschl, U.: Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols – fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 37–71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-37-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-37-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 46?><mixed-citation>Pósfai, M. and Buseck, P. R.:
Nature and climate effects of individual tropospheric aerosol particles,
Annu. Rev. Earth. Pl. Sc.,
38, 17–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100032</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 47?><mixed-citation>Qin, J., Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Mu, S., Xiao, K., Hu, J., and Tan, J.:
Fluorescence fingerprinting properties for exploring water-soluble organic compounds in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in an industrial city of northwest China,
Atmos. Environ.,
184, 203–211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 49?><mixed-citation>Santos, P. S. M., Duarte, R., and Duarte, A. C.:
Absorption and fluorescence properties of rainwater during the cold season at a town in Western Portugal,
J. Atmos. Chem.,
62, 45–57, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-009-9138-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-009-9138-1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 50?><mixed-citation>Stark, R. E., Yu, B., Zhong, J., Yan, B., Wu, G., and Tian, S.:
Environmental NMR: High-resolution Magic-angle Spinning,
eMagRes,
2, 377–388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1340</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 51?><mixed-citation>Tan, J., Xiang, P., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Ma, Y., He, K., Cheng, Y., Yu, J., and Querol, X.:
Chemical characterization of humic-like substances (HULIS) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Lanzhou, China,
Sci. Total Environ.,
573, 1481–1490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.025</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 52?><mixed-citation>Tian, S., Pan, Y., Liu, Z., Wen, T., and Wang, Y.:
Size-resolved aerosol chemical analysis of extreme haze pollution events during early 2013 in urban Beijing, China,
J. Hazard. Mater.,
279, 452–460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.023</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 53?><mixed-citation>Tian, S. L., Pan, Y. P., and Wang, Y. S.: Size-resolved source apportionment of particulate matter in urban Beijing during haze and non-haze episodes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 54?><mixed-citation>Vione, D., Albinet, A., Barsotti, F., Mekic, M., Jiang, B., Minero, C., Brigante, M., and Gligorovski, S.:
Formation of substances with humic-like fluorescence properties, upon photoinduced oligomerization of typical phenolic compounds emitted by biomass burning,
Atmos. Environ.,
206, 197–207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.005</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 55?><mixed-citation>Voliotis, A., Prokeš, R., Lammel, G., and Samara, C.:
New insights on humic-like substances associated with wintertime urban aerosols from central and southern Europe: Size-resolved chemical characterization and optical properties,
Atmos. Environ.,
166, 286–299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.024</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 56?><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Zhang, L., Huo, T., Wang, B., Yang, F., Chen, Y., Tian, M., Qiao, B., and Peng, C.:
Application of parallel factor analysis model to decompose excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectra for characterizing sources of water-soluble brown carbon in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Atmos. Environ.,
223, 117–192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117192</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 57?><mixed-citation>Wu, C., Wang, G., Li, J., Li, J., Cao, C., Ge, S., Xie, Y., Chen, J., Li, X., Xue, G., Wang, X., Zhao, Z., and Cao, F.: The characteristics of atmospheric brown carbon in Xi'an, inland China: sources, size distributions and optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2017–2030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 58?><mixed-citation>Xiang, P., Zhou, X. M., Duan, J. C., Tan, J. H., He, K. B., Yuan, C., Ma, Y. L., and Zhang, Y. X.:
Chemical characteristics of water-soluble organic compounds (WSOC) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing, China: 2011–2012,
Atmos. Res.,
183, 104–112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.020</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 61?><mixed-citation>Xiao, K., Sun, J.-Y., Shen, Y.-X., Liang, S., Liang, P., Wang, X.-M., and Huang, X.:
Fluorescence properties of dissolved organic matter as a function of hydrophobicity and molecular weight: case studies from two membrane bioreactors and an oxidation ditch,
RSC Adv.,
6, 24050–24059, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA23167A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C5RA23167A</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 60?><mixed-citation>Xiao, K., Shen, Y., Liang, S., Tan, J., Wang, X., Liang, P., and Huang, X.:
Characteristic regions of the fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) to identify hydrophobic/hydrophilic contents of organic matter in membrane bioreactors,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 11251–11258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02684" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b02684</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 59?><mixed-citation>Xiao, K., Han, B., Sun, J., Tan, J., Yu, J., Liang, S., Shen, Y., and Huang, X.:
Stokes shift and specific fluorescence as potential indicators of organic matter hydrophobicity and molecular weight in membrane bioreactors,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
53, 8985–8993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b02114</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 62?><mixed-citation>Xiao, K., Yu, J., Wang, S., Du, J., Tan, J., Xue, K., Wang, Y., and Huang, X.:
Relationship between fluorescence excitation-emission matrix properties and the relative degree of DOM hydrophobicity in wastewater treatment effluents,
Chemosphere,
254, 126830, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126830" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126830</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 64?><mixed-citation>Xu, J. A., Sheng, G. P., Luo, H. W., Fang, F., Li, W. W., Zeng, R. J., Tong, Z. H., and Yu, H. Q.:
Evaluating the influence of process parameters on soluble microbial products formation using response surface methodology coupled with grey relational analysis,
Water Res.,
45, 674–680, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.032</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 65?><mixed-citation>Yan, C., Nie, W., Vogel, A. L., Dada, L., Lehtipalo, K., Stolzenburg, D., Wagner, R., Rissanen, M. P., Xiao, M., Ahonen, L., Fischer, L., Rose, C., Bianchi, F., Gordon, H., Simon, M., Heinritzi, M., Garmash, O., Roldin, P., Dias, A., Ye, P., Hofbauer, V., Amorim, A., Bauer, P. S., Bergen, A., Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Buchholz, A., Mazon, S. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Chen, X., Ding, A., Dommen, J., Draper, D. C., Duplissy, J., Frege, C., Heyn, C., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Heikkinen, L., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kirkby, J., Kontkanen, J., Kürten, A., Lawler, M. J., Mai, H., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Nieminen, T., Nowak, J., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Pajunoja, A., Petäjä, T., Piel, F., Quéléver, L. L. J., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Sengupta, K., Sipilä, M., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J., Väisänen, O., Wagner, A. C., Ylisirniö, A., Zha, Q., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Riipinen, I., Smith, J. N., Virtanen, A., Winkler, <?pagebreak page479?>P. M., Donahue, N. M., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Size-dependent influence of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the growth rates of organic aerosol particles,
Sci. Adv.,
6, eaay4945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay4945" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aay4945</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 66?><mixed-citation>You, M. L., Shu, C. M., Chen, W. T., and Shyu, M. L.:
Analysis of cardinal grey relational grade and grey entropy on achievement of air pollution reduction by evaluating air quality trend in Japan,
J. Clean. Prod.,
142, 3883–3889, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.072</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 67?><mixed-citation>Yu, G. H., Park, S., and Lee, K. H.:
Source contributions and potential source regions of size-resolved water-soluble organic carbon measured at an urban site over one year,
Environ. Sci.-Proc. Imp.,
18, 1343–1358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c6em00416d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c6em00416d</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 68?><mixed-citation>Yu, J. Z., Yang, H., Zhang, H. Y., and Lau, A. K. H.:
Size distributions of water-soluble organic carbon in ambient aerosols and its size-resolved thermal characteristics,
Atmos. Environ.,
38, 1061–1071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.049</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 69?><mixed-citation>Yu, Q., Chen, J., Qin, W., Cheng, S., Zhang, Y., Ahmad, M., and Ouyang, W.:
Characteristics and secondary formation of water-soluble organic acids in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Beijing during haze episodes,
Sci. Total. Environ.,
669, 175–184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.131</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 70?><mixed-citation>Yue, S., Ren, L., Song, T., Li, L., Xie, Q., Li, W., Kang, M., Zhao, W., Wei, L., Ren, H., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Ellam, R. M., Liu, C. Q., Kawamura, K., and Fu, P.:
Abundance and Diurnal Trends of Fluorescent Bioaerosols in the Troposphere over Mt. Tai, China, in Spring,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
124, 4158–4173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018jd029486</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 71?><mixed-citation>Zanca, N., Lambe, A. T., Massoli, P., Paglione, M., Croasdale, D. R., Parmar, Y., Tagliavini, E., Gilardoni, S., and Decesari, S.: Characterizing source fingerprints and ageing processes in laboratory-generated secondary organic aerosols using proton-nuclear magnetic resonance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NMR) analysis and HPLC HULIS determination, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10405–10421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10405-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10405-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 72?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Liu, Z., Hecobian, A., Zheng, M., Frank, N. H., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R. J.: Spatial and seasonal variations of fine particle water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) over the southeastern United States: implications for secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6593–6607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6593-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-6593-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 73?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Xu, J., Kang, S., Liu, Y., and Zhang, Q.: Chemical characterization of long-range transport biomass burning emissions to the Himalayas: insights from high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4617–4638, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4617-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-4617-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 74?><mixed-citation>Zhao, W., Fu, P., Yue, S., Li, L., Xie, Q., Zhu, C., Wei, L., Ren, H., Li, P., Li, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Kawamura, K., and Chen, J.:
Excitation-emission matrix fluorescence, molecular characterization and compound-specific stable carbon isotopic composition of dissolved organic matter in cloud water over Mt. Tai,
Atmos. Environ.,
213, 608–619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.034</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Measurement report: Particle-size-dependent fluorescence properties of water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) and their atmospheric implications for the aging of WSOCs</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Almeida, A. S., Ferreira, R. M. P., Silva, A. M. S., Duarte, A. C., Neves, B. M., and Duarte, R.:
Structural features and pro-inflammatory effects of water-soluble organic matter in inhalable fine urban air particles,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
54, 1082–1091, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04596" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04596</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Andrade-Eiroa, Á., Canle, M., and Cerdá, V.:
Environmental applications of excitation-emission spectrofluorimetry: An in-depth review I,
Appl. Spectrosc. Rev.,
48, 1–49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2012.692104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2012.692104</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Asa-Awuku, A., Engelhart, G. J., Lee, B. H., Pandis, S. N., and Nenes, A.: Relating CCN activity, volatility, and droplet growth kinetics of <i>β</i>-caryophyllene secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 795–812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-795-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-795-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bahram, M., Bro, R., Stedmon, C., and Afkhami, A.:
Handling of Rayleigh and Raman scatter for PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence data using interpolation,
J. Chemometr.,
20, 99–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.978</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Berberan-Santos, M. N. and Valeur, B.:
Molecular fluorescence: Principles and Applications, second edn.,
Wiley-VCH, Germany, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527650002.index" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527650002.index</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Birdwell, J. E. and Engel, A. S.:
Characterization of dissolved organic matter in cave and spring waters using UV-Vis absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopy,
Org. Geochem.,
41, 270–280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.002</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Burnett, R., Chen, H., Szyszkowicz, M., Fann, N., Hubbell, B., Pope, C. A., Apte, J. S., Brauer, M., Cohen, A., Weichenthal, S., Coggins, J., Di, Q., Brunekreef, B., Frostad, J., Lim, S. S., Kan, H., Walker, K. D., Thurston, G. D., Hayes, R. B., Lim, C. C., Turner, M. C., Jerrett, M., Krewski, D., Gapstur, S. M., Diver, W. R., Ostro, B., Goldberg, D., Crouse, D. L., Martin, R. V., Peters, P., Pinault, L., Tjepkema, M., van Donkelaar, A., Villeneuve, P. J., Miller, A. B., Yin, P., Zhou, M., Wang, L., Janssen, N. A. H., Marra, M., Atkinson, R. W., Tsang, H., Quoc Thach, T., Cannon, J. B., Allen, R. T., Hart, J. E., Laden, F., Cesaroni, G., Forastiere, F., Weinmayr, G., Jaensch, A., Nagel, G., Concin, H., and Spadaro, J. V.:
Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
115, 9592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803222115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803222115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, J., Zeng, X., Zhi, G., Gligorovski, S., Sheng, G., Yu, Z., Wang, X., and Peng, P.: Molecular composition and photochemical evolution of water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) extracted from field biomass burning aerosols using high-resolution mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6115–6128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6115-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6115-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chalbot, M. G., Chitranshi, P., da Costa, G. G., Pollock, E., and Kavouras, I. G.:
Characterization of water-soluble organic matter in urban aerosol by <sup>1</sup>H-NMR spectroscopy,
Atmos. Environ.,
128, 235–245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.067</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Mu, Z., Song, W., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, L., and Zhang, Y. L.:
Size-resolved characterization of the chromophores in atmospheric particulate matter from a typical coal-burning city in China,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos,
124, 10546–10563, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031149" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031149</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q. C., Ikemori, F., and Mochida, M.:
Light absorption and excitation-emission fluorescence of urban organic aerosol components and their relationship to chemical structure,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
50, 10859–10868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02541</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q. C., Miyazaki, Y., Kawamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Coburn, S., Volkamer, R., Iwamoto, Y., Kagami, S., Deng, Y. G., Ogawa, S., Ramasamy, S., Kato, S., Ida, A., Kajii, Y., and Mochida, M.:
Characterization of chromophoric water-soluble organic matter in urban, forest, and marine aerosols by HR-ToF-MS analysis and excitation emission matrix spectroscopy,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
50, 10351–10360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01643</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., He, K. B., Duan, F. K., Zheng, M., Ma, Y. L., and Tan, J. H.:
Measurement of semivolatile carbonaceous aerosols and its implications: A review,
Environ. Int.,
35, 674–681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.11.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.11.007</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Coble, P.:
Aquatic organic matter fluorescence,
Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045452" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045452</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Coble, P. G.:
Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation emission matrix spectroscopy,
Mar. Chem.,
51, 325–346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dasari, S., Andersson, A., Bikkina, S., Holmstrand, H., Budhavant, K., Satheesh, S., Asmi, E., Kesti, J., Backman, J., Salam, A., Bisht, D. S., Tiwari, S., Hameed, Z., and Gustafsson, Ö.:
Photochemical degradation affects the light absorption of water-soluble brown carbon in the South Asian outflow,
Sci. Adv.,
10, eaau8066, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8066</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
De Laurentiis, E., Sur, B., Pazzi, M., Maurino, V., Minero, C., Mailhot, G., Brigante, M., and Vione, D.:
Phenol transformation and dimerisation, photosensitised by the triplet state of 1-nitronaphthalene: A possible pathway to humic-like substances (HULIS) in atmospheric waters,
Atmos. Environ.,
70, 318–327, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.014</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Matta, E., Lettini, F., Mircea, M., Fuzzi, S., Tagliavini, E., and Putaud, J. P.:
Chemical features and seasonal variation of fine aerosol water-soluble organic compounds in the Po Valley, Italy,
Atmos. Environ.,
35, 3691–3699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00509-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00509-4</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Deng, J.-L.:
Control problems of grey systems,
Syst. Control Lett.,
1, 288–294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Deshmukh, D. K., Kawamura, K., and Deb, M. K.:
Dicarboxylic acids, omega-oxocarboxylic acids, alpha-dicarbonyls, WSOC, OC, EC, and inorganic ions in wintertime size segregated aerosols from central India: Sources and formation processes,
Chemosphere,
161, 27–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.107</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, R., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.:
Synchronous scan and excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy of water-soluble organic compounds in atmospheric aerosols,
J. Atmos. Chem.,
48, 157–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCH.0000036845.82039.8c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCH.0000036845.82039.8c</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, R., Santos, E. B. H., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.:
Comparison of structural features of water-soluble organic matter from atmospheric aerosols with those of aquatic humic substances,
Atmos. Environ.,
41, 8100–8113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.034</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, R., Pineiro-Iglesias, M., Lopez-Mahia, P., Muniategui-Lorenzo, S., Moreda-Pineiro, J., Silva, A. M. S., and Duarte, A. C.:
Comparative study of atmospheric water-soluble organic aerosols composition in contrasting suburban environments in the Iberian Peninsula Coast,
Sci. Total Environ.,
648, 430–441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.171</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, R. M. B. O., Freire, S. M. S. C., and Duarte, A. C.:
Investigating the water-soluble organic functionality of urban aerosols using two-dimensional correlation of solid-state <sup>13</sup>C-NMR and FTIR spectral data,
Atmos. Environ.,
116, 245–252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.043</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, R. M. B. O., Duan, P., Mao, J., Chu, W., Duarte, A. C., and Schmidt-Rohr, K.:
Exploring water-soluble organic aerosols structures in urban atmosphere using advanced solid-state <sup>13</sup>C-NMR spectroscopy,
Atmos. Environ.,
230, 117503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117503" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117503</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, J., Rosenfeld, D., Zhang, Y., Giangrande, S. E., Li, Z., Machado, L. A. T., Martin, S. T., Yang, Y., Wang, J., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, H. M. J., Braga, R. C., Comstock, J. M., Feng, Z., Gao, W., Gomes, H. B., Mei, F., Pöhlker, C., Pöhlker, M. L., Pöschl, U., and de Souza, R. A. F.:
Substantial convection and precipitation enhancements by ultrafine aerosol particles,
Science,
359, 8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8461</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Frka, S., Grgić, I., Turšič, J., Gini, M. I., and Eleftheriadis, K.:
Seasonal variability of carbon in humic-like matter of ambient size segregated water-soluble organic aerosols from urban background environment,
Atmos. Environ.,
173, 239–247, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.013</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, P., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., and Miyazaki, Y.:
Secondary production of organic aerosols from biogenic VOCs over Mt. Fuji, Japan,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
48, 8491–8497, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es500794d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es500794d</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, P., Kawamura, K., Chen, J., Qin, M., Ren, L., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Barrie, L. A., Tachibana, E., Ding, A., and Yamashita, Y.:
Fluorescent water-soluble organic aerosols in the High Arctic atmosphere,
Sci. Rep.-UK,
5, 9845, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09845</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hecobian, A., Zhang, X., Zheng, M., Frank, N., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R. J.: Water-Soluble Organic Aerosol material and the light-absorption characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5965–5977, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5965-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, X. F., Dai, J., Zhu, Q., Yu, K., and Du, K.:
Abundant biogenic oxygenated organic aerosol in atmospheric coarse particles: plausible sources and atmospheric implications,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
54, 1425–1430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06311" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06311</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jang, K.-S., Choi, A. Y., Choi, M., Kang, H., Kim, T.-W., and Park, K.-T.:
Size segregated chemical compositions of HULISs in ambient aerosols collected during the winter season in Songdo, South Korea,
Atmosphere,
10, 226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040226" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040226</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Johnston, M. V. and Kerecman, D. E.:
Molecular Characterization of Atmospheric Organic Aerosol by Mass Spectrometry,
Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem.,
12, 247–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-061516-045135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-061516-045135</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kalberer, M., Paulsen, D., Sax, M., Steinbacher, M., Dommen, J., Prevot, A. S. H., Fisseha, R., Weingartner, E., Frankevich, V., and Zenobi, R.:
Identification of polymers as major components of atmospheric organic aerosols,
Science,
303, 1659–1662, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092185</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Kalbitz, K., Geyer, S., and Geyer, W.:
A comparative characterization of dissolved organic matter by means of original aqueous samples and isolated humic substances, Chemosphere, 40, 1305–1312, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00238-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00238-6</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kuo, Y., Yang, T., and Huang, G. W.:
The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems,
Comput. Ind. Eng.,
55, 80–93, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lakowicz, J. R.:
Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy,
Springer US, Baltimore, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46312-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46312-4</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, H. J., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Excitation-emission spectra and fluorescence quantum yields for fresh and aged biogenic secondary organic aerosols,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
47, 5763–5770, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es400644c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es400644c</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, H. J., Aiona, P. K., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Effect of solar radiation on the optical properties and molecular composition of laboratory proxies of atmospheric brown carbon,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
48, 10217–10226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es502515r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es502515r</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Masalaite, A., Holzinger, R., Ceburnis, D., Remeikis, V., Ulevicius, V., Rockmann, T., and Dusek, U.:
Sources and atmospheric processing of size segregated aerosol particles revealed by stable carbon isotope ratios and chemical speciation,
Environ. Pollut.,
240, 286–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.073</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mayorga, R. J., Zhao, Z., and Zhang, H.:
Formation of secondary organic aerosol from nitrate radical oxidation of phenolic VOCs: Implications for nitration mechanisms and brown carbon formation,
Atmos. Environ.,
244, 117910, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117910" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117910</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Morán, J., Granada, E., Míguez, J. L., and Porteiro, J.:
Use of grey relational analysis to assess and optimize small biomass boilers,
Fuel Process. Technol.,
87, 123–127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.08.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.08.008</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, K. R., Hambly, A., Singh, S., Henderson, R. K., Baker, A., Stuetz, R., and Khan, S. J.:
Organic matter fluorescence in municipal water recycling schemes: toward a unified PARAFAC model,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
45, 2909–2916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103015e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es103015e</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Park S., Yu, J., Yu, G.-H., and Bae, M.-S.:
Chemical and absorption characteristics of water-soluble organic carbon and humic-like substances in size segregated particles from biomass burning emissions,
Asian J. Atmos. Environ.,
11, 96–106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2017.11.2.096" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2017.11.2.096</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J. A., and Pöschl, U.: Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols – fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 37–71, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-37-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-37-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Pósfai, M. and Buseck, P. R.:
Nature and climate effects of individual tropospheric aerosol particles,
Annu. Rev. Earth. Pl. Sc.,
38, 17–43, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100032</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, J., Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Mu, S., Xiao, K., Hu, J., and Tan, J.:
Fluorescence fingerprinting properties for exploring water-soluble organic compounds in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in an industrial city of northwest China,
Atmos. Environ.,
184, 203–211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.049</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Santos, P. S. M., Duarte, R., and Duarte, A. C.:
Absorption and fluorescence properties of rainwater during the cold season at a town in Western Portugal,
J. Atmos. Chem.,
62, 45–57, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-009-9138-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-009-9138-1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Stark, R. E., Yu, B., Zhong, J., Yan, B., Wu, G., and Tian, S.:
Environmental NMR: High-resolution Magic-angle Spinning,
eMagRes,
2, 377–388, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1340</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, J., Xiang, P., Zhou, X., Duan, J., Ma, Y., He, K., Cheng, Y., Yu, J., and Querol, X.:
Chemical characterization of humic-like substances (HULIS) in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Lanzhou, China,
Sci. Total Environ.,
573, 1481–1490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.025</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, S., Pan, Y., Liu, Z., Wen, T., and Wang, Y.:
Size-resolved aerosol chemical analysis of extreme haze pollution events during early 2013 in urban Beijing, China,
J. Hazard. Mater.,
279, 452–460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.023</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, S. L., Pan, Y. P., and Wang, Y. S.: Size-resolved source apportionment of particulate matter in urban Beijing during haze and non-haze episodes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Vione, D., Albinet, A., Barsotti, F., Mekic, M., Jiang, B., Minero, C., Brigante, M., and Gligorovski, S.:
Formation of substances with humic-like fluorescence properties, upon photoinduced oligomerization of typical phenolic compounds emitted by biomass burning,
Atmos. Environ.,
206, 197–207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.005</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Voliotis, A., Prokeš, R., Lammel, G., and Samara, C.:
New insights on humic-like substances associated with wintertime urban aerosols from central and southern Europe: Size-resolved chemical characterization and optical properties,
Atmos. Environ.,
166, 286–299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.024</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H., Zhang, L., Huo, T., Wang, B., Yang, F., Chen, Y., Tian, M., Qiao, B., and Peng, C.:
Application of parallel factor analysis model to decompose excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectra for characterizing sources of water-soluble brown carbon in PM<sub>2.5</sub>,
Atmos. Environ.,
223, 117–192, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117192</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, C., Wang, G., Li, J., Li, J., Cao, C., Ge, S., Xie, Y., Chen, J., Li, X., Xue, G., Wang, X., Zhao, Z., and Cao, F.: The characteristics of atmospheric brown carbon in Xi'an, inland China: sources, size distributions and optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2017–2030, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2017-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Xiang, P., Zhou, X. M., Duan, J. C., Tan, J. H., He, K. B., Yuan, C., Ma, Y. L., and Zhang, Y. X.:
Chemical characteristics of water-soluble organic compounds (WSOC) in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Beijing, China: 2011–2012,
Atmos. Res.,
183, 104–112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.08.020</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, K., Sun, J.-Y., Shen, Y.-X., Liang, S., Liang, P., Wang, X.-M., and Huang, X.:
Fluorescence properties of dissolved organic matter as a function of hydrophobicity and molecular weight: case studies from two membrane bioreactors and an oxidation ditch,
RSC Adv.,
6, 24050–24059, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA23167A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA23167A</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, K., Shen, Y., Liang, S., Tan, J., Wang, X., Liang, P., and Huang, X.:
Characteristic regions of the fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) to identify hydrophobic/hydrophilic contents of organic matter in membrane bioreactors,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 11251–11258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02684" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02684</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, K., Han, B., Sun, J., Tan, J., Yu, J., Liang, S., Shen, Y., and Huang, X.:
Stokes shift and specific fluorescence as potential indicators of organic matter hydrophobicity and molecular weight in membrane bioreactors,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
53, 8985–8993, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02114</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Xiao, K., Yu, J., Wang, S., Du, J., Tan, J., Xue, K., Wang, Y., and Huang, X.:
Relationship between fluorescence excitation-emission matrix properties and the relative degree of DOM hydrophobicity in wastewater treatment effluents,
Chemosphere,
254, 126830, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126830" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126830</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, J. A., Sheng, G. P., Luo, H. W., Fang, F., Li, W. W., Zeng, R. J., Tong, Z. H., and Yu, H. Q.:
Evaluating the influence of process parameters on soluble microbial products formation using response surface methodology coupled with grey relational analysis,
Water Res.,
45, 674–680, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.032</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, C., Nie, W., Vogel, A. L., Dada, L., Lehtipalo, K., Stolzenburg, D., Wagner, R., Rissanen, M. P., Xiao, M., Ahonen, L., Fischer, L., Rose, C., Bianchi, F., Gordon, H., Simon, M., Heinritzi, M., Garmash, O., Roldin, P., Dias, A., Ye, P., Hofbauer, V., Amorim, A., Bauer, P. S., Bergen, A., Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Buchholz, A., Mazon, S. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Chen, X., Ding, A., Dommen, J., Draper, D. C., Duplissy, J., Frege, C., Heyn, C., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Heikkinen, L., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kirkby, J., Kontkanen, J., Kürten, A., Lawler, M. J., Mai, H., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Nieminen, T., Nowak, J., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Pajunoja, A., Petäjä, T., Piel, F., Quéléver, L. L. J., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Sengupta, K., Sipilä, M., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J., Väisänen, O., Wagner, A. C., Ylisirniö, A., Zha, Q., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Riipinen, I., Smith, J. N., Virtanen, A., Winkler, P. M., Donahue, N. M., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Size-dependent influence of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> on the growth rates of organic aerosol particles,
Sci. Adv.,
6, eaay4945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay4945" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay4945</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
You, M. L., Shu, C. M., Chen, W. T., and Shyu, M. L.:
Analysis of cardinal grey relational grade and grey entropy on achievement of air pollution reduction by evaluating air quality trend in Japan,
J. Clean. Prod.,
142, 3883–3889, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.072" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.072</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G. H., Park, S., and Lee, K. H.:
Source contributions and potential source regions of size-resolved water-soluble organic carbon measured at an urban site over one year,
Environ. Sci.-Proc. Imp.,
18, 1343–1358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c6em00416d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c6em00416d</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, J. Z., Yang, H., Zhang, H. Y., and Lau, A. K. H.:
Size distributions of water-soluble organic carbon in ambient aerosols and its size-resolved thermal characteristics,
Atmos. Environ.,
38, 1061–1071, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.049</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, Q., Chen, J., Qin, W., Cheng, S., Zhang, Y., Ahmad, M., and Ouyang, W.:
Characteristics and secondary formation of water-soluble organic acids in PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> in Beijing during haze episodes,
Sci. Total. Environ.,
669, 175–184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.131</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Yue, S., Ren, L., Song, T., Li, L., Xie, Q., Li, W., Kang, M., Zhao, W., Wei, L., Ren, H., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Ellam, R. M., Liu, C. Q., Kawamura, K., and Fu, P.:
Abundance and Diurnal Trends of Fluorescent Bioaerosols in the Troposphere over Mt. Tai, China, in Spring,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
124, 4158–4173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029486</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Zanca, N., Lambe, A. T., Massoli, P., Paglione, M., Croasdale, D. R., Parmar, Y., Tagliavini, E., Gilardoni, S., and Decesari, S.: Characterizing source fingerprints and ageing processes in laboratory-generated secondary organic aerosols using proton-nuclear magnetic resonance (<sup>1</sup>H-NMR) analysis and HPLC HULIS determination, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10405–10421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10405-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10405-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Liu, Z., Hecobian, A., Zheng, M., Frank, N. H., Edgerton, E. S., and Weber, R. J.: Spatial and seasonal variations of fine particle water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) over the southeastern United States: implications for secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6593–6607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6593-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6593-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Xu, J., Kang, S., Liu, Y., and Zhang, Q.: Chemical characterization of long-range transport biomass burning emissions to the Himalayas: insights from high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4617–4638, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4617-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4617-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, W., Fu, P., Yue, S., Li, L., Xie, Q., Zhu, C., Wei, L., Ren, H., Li, P., Li, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Kawamura, K., and Chen, J.:
Excitation-emission matrix fluorescence, molecular characterization and compound-specific stable carbon isotopic composition of dissolved organic matter in cloud water over Mt. Tai,
Atmos. Environ.,
213, 608–619, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.034</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
